US 7,272,459 B2Grant

Method, system and medium for controlling manufacture process having multivariate input parameters

Issue Date:2007-09-18

•23 Claims

•9 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

A method, system, and medium of modeling and/or for controlling a manufacturing process is disclosed. In particular, a method according to embodiments of the present invention includes the step of identifying one or more input parameters. Each input parameter causes a change in at least two outputs. The method also includes the step of storing values of the identified inputs and corresponding empirical output values along with predicted output values. The predicted output values are calculated based on, in part, the values of the identified inputs. The method also includes the step of calculating a set of transform coefficients by minimizing a score equation that is a function of differences between one or more of the empirical output values and their corresponding predicted output values. The method further includes the steps of receiving a new set of values for the identified inputs, transforming the new set of values for the identified input using the set of coefficients, and calculating a set of predicted output values using the transformed input values.

Metadata

Assignee

Applied Materials, Inc.

Inventors

Yuri Kokotov
Efim Entin
Jacques Seror
Yossi Fisher
Shalomo Sarel
Arulkumar P. Shanmugasundram
Alexander T. Schwarm
Young Jeen Paik

Application Information

Application Number:US 10/712,273

Filing Date:2003-11-14

Priority Date:2002-11-15

Art Unit:2125

Classifications

IPC:

G06F19/00

Patent Drawings (9 sheets)

Description

Related Application

[0001] This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/426,393, filed Nov. 15, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Field of the Invention

[0002] The present invention relates to a method, system and medium for modeling and controlling processes. More specifically, the present invention relates to modeling and controlling semiconductor-processing equipment that has multivariate input parameters.

Background of the Invention

[0003] In manufacturing products that include precision discrete parts (e.g., microelectronic chips on silicon substrates), controlling manufacturing processes plays a crucial role. Controlling such processes may require, among other things, monitoring the characteristics of manufactured parts (e.g., processed wafers, hereinafter referred to as outputs) and adjusting input parameters accordingly. By adjusting the values of the input parameters, different types of outputs can be produced and the characteristics of the outputs can also be controlled.

[0004] For automating the control of the manufacturing processes, a mathematical model of the processing equipment can be used. One example of such a model is called a predictive model. This model is used to predict the future output values (e.g., the characteristics of products) based on historical information (e.g., input parameter values and the corresponding output qualities).

[0005] One such predictive model is an offset technique, which is illustrated in FIG. 1. In particular, the values of a number of input parameters 101 are received by an input/output dependency model 103, which calculates a predicted output value y₁^Pred105 based on the input values. A corrector 109 then compares the predicted value y₁^Predwith an actual output value y₁^a107 for the given values of the input parameters. If the predicted and actual output values are similar to each other within a certain range, no change is made to the input/output dependency model 103. If the predicted and actual output values are different (e.g., outside the range) from each other, the predictor input/output dependency model 103 is modified by adjusting an offset value (O₁) 111 based on the magnitude of the difference.

[0006] In equipment that has more than one output, at least some of the outputs may include mutual (shared) inputs. This means the output values of the equipment are not completely independent from each other (e.g., changing an input to adjust a given output may unintentionally change the characteristics of other outputs). In a conventional modeling technique, each output has its own correction system as if the output values are independent from each other. Because the dependencies between the different outputs are not accounted for by the conventional technique, it does not always lead to accurate predictions. In addition, adjusting one offset of one output can affect other outputs.

Summary of the Invention

[0007] Embodiments of the present invention advantageously overcome the above-described shortcomings of the aforementioned techniques. More specifically, embodiments of the present invention provide a system, method and medium for controlling semiconductor-processing equipment that has multivariate input parameters and outputs.

[0008] Embodiments of the present invention minimize the effects of outputs being interdependent from each other. This is achieved by providing input parameter transformations having transformation coefficients. The coefficients are obtained by minimizing a score function. This, in turn, allows accurate models to be obtained. Using the models, highly precise control of manufacturing equipment is accomplished.

[0009] In particular, an example method according to embodiments of the present invention includes the steps of identifying at least one input that causes a change in at least two of a plurality of outputs, storing values of the identified inputs and corresponding empirical output values, and calculating and storing predicted output values, based on, in part, the values of the identified inputs. The example method may further include the steps of calculating a set of transform coefficients by minimizing a score equation that is a function of, in part, differences between one or more of the empirical output values and their corresponding predicted output values, and calculating one or more input values for one or more desired output values based on, in part, the calculated set of transform coefficients.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0010] The detailed description of the present application showing various distinctive features may be best understood when the detailed description is read in reference to the appended drawings in which:

[0011] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a conventional offset model;

[0012] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating processing equipment;

[0013] FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a model of the processing equipment shown in FIG. 2 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention;

[0014] FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating various components of embodiments of the present invention;

[0015] FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating processing steps of embodiments of the present invention;

[0016] FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a CMP process;

[0017] FIG. 7 is a block diagram representation of an example embodiment of a computer configured to perform embodiments of the present invention; and

[0018] FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of a memory medium that can be used for storing computer programs of embodiments of the present invention.

Detailed Description

[0019] Embodiments of the present invention generally provide systems, methods and mediums for creating one or more adaptive process models to mathematically represent multivariate input parameter systems. The present invention is particularly applicable in a manufacturing process such as manufacturing and/or processing semiconductor wafers. In particular, the present invention relates to modeling techniques as used by equipment involved in the manufacturing of semiconductor wafers. A general overview of embodiments of the present invention is provided below. It will be followed by a specific example implementation of the present invention.

[0020] Before discussing embodiments of the present invention, FIG. 2 shows a simplified graphical representation of processing equipment 205 with input parameters 201 and outputs 203. Examples of processing equipment include etcher tools, deposition tools, chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) tools, etc. The processing equipment 205 can include one or more tools. Depending upon the values of the input parameters 201, different processes can be achieved. For instance, in a deposition tool, different types of layers can be deposited on a wafer and/or the thickness of the layer can be varied.

[0021] As a general overview of embodiments of the present invention, in FIG. 3, the processing equipment 205 has a set of input parameters 301, a set of predicted outputs 303, and a prediction model 305 therebetween (replacing the processing equipment of FIG. 2). The overall goal of the prediction model is to minimize differences between the predicted output values and empirically collected output values (i.e., the actual output values). Once the prediction model is optimized (e.g., the differences between the predicted and actual output values have been minimized), the model can then be used in setting input parameters based on desired output values. In other words, for a given set of desired output values, the model can be used in a reverse fashion to calculate the input parameter values that would cause output values close to the desired output values. The calculated input parameter values are also known as recipes.

[0022] In embodiments of the present invention, the step of obtaining the predictive model can be divided into two steps. The first is to transform the values of the input parameters 301 into transformed input values 307. The second is to use the transformed input values 307 in calculating predicted output values 303.

[0023] With respect to the transformation, input parameter values (X₁,X₂,X₃) along with coefficient vector {right arrow over (P)} are transformed into (X′₁,X′₂, and X′₃) by transform functions ψ₁, ψ₂, and ψ₃. Examples of transformation functions include:

[0024] 1) X′₁=PX₁; X′₂=PX₂(In this example, the value of {right arrow over (P)} is identical for both X1 and X2.)
[0025] 2) X′₁=P₁₁X₁+P₁₂X₁²; X′₂=P₂₁X₁+P₂₂X₂²+P_crossX₁X₂(In this example, P₁₁, P₁₂, P₂₁, P₂₂and P_crosscan have different values.)

[0026] The coefficient values are calculated by the steps of: a. collecting historical information on input parameter values and actual output values; b. creating a score function based on the collected information; and c. finding the coefficient values that minimize the score function, S_p.

[0027] The above steps are described by making references to semiconductor processing tools. As such, the step of collecting the historical information entails a set of data points for processing a number of wafers. In particular, input parameter values and actual output values for a number of wafers that have been processed by the processing equipment would be collected. This collection would then be used in the next step of minimizing the score function.

Here, the score function, S_p, is:

[0028]

S_{p} = \sum_{i, k} {W_{i, k} (y_{actual}^{i k} - y_{predicted}^{i k} ({\vec{X}}^{i^{'}} ({\vec{X}}^{i}, \vec{P})))}^{2}

where:

[0029] i—number of wafer;
[0030] k—number of output;
[0031] y_actual—an actual output value;
[0032] y_predicted—a predicted output value, as calculated based on transformed inputs for a particular wafer i ({right arrow over (X)}^i′);
[0033] {right arrow over (X)}^i′=(X₁^i′,X₂^i′,X₃^i′) is the transformed input vector, calculated on the base of the actual input; and {right arrow over (X)}ⁱ=(X₁ⁱ,X₂ⁱ,X₃ⁱ) for wafer i together with the transformation parameters {right arrow over (P)}. This calculation is performed using the following transformation functions:
ψ₁(X₁,X₂,X₃,{right arrow over (P)}): ψ₂(X₁,X₂,X₃,{right arrow over (P)}); and ψ₃(X₁,X₂,X₃,{right arrow over (P)}).
The next step, as noted above, is to minimize the score S_p, i.e., to find {right arrow over (P)} values that provide the minimum of

[0034]

S_{p} (S_{p} \underset{p}{⟶} \min)

[0035] The above-described steps calculate an optimal {right arrow over (P)} (i.e., a vector of coefficients for input transformation functions) such that the prediction model of the present invention provides the closest possible predicted outputs to the actual outputs. In a processing model with multivariate input parameters, when the score is minimized, the negative effect of the interdependencies between output values on the model accuracy would also be minimized.

[0036] Now turning to describe an example implementation of the embodiments described above, as shown in FIG. 4, the example implementation includes a number of components: an input transformer 401, an input-output dependency model 403, a corrector 405 and a storage device 407. All these components can be implemented in hardware, firmware, software and/or any combination thereof.

[0037] These components are further explained by also referring to FIG. 5. In particular, the historical information (i.e., y_a^ik,{right arrow over (X)}ⁱ) is stored into the storage device 407. The corrector 405 then retrieves the historical information (y_a^ik, {right arrow over (X)}ⁱ) from the storage device 407 (step 501). Since the retrieved historical information contains raw input parameter values, the information is sent to the input transformer 401 along with coefficients {right arrow over (P)} (step 503). The coefficient {right arrow over (P)} can be stored in the storage device 407 or in the corrector 405.

[0038] The input transformer 401, upon receiving the information from the corrector 405, calculates transformed input parameter values {right arrow over (X)}^i′ (step 505). Once the transformed input parameter values are calculated, the input transformer 401 sends the transformed input values to the corrector 405.

[0039] The corrector 405, upon receiving the transformed input parameter values from the input transformer 401, sends the transformed input parameter values to the input/output dependence model 403. The input/output dependency model 403 then calculates predicted output parameter values y_pred(step 507). The corrector 405 then calculates the score S_p, and sets a new {right arrow over (P)} (a vector of parameters of input transformation functions) in order to minimize the score S_p(step 509). These steps can be repeated until an optimum {right arrow over (P)} that yields a minimal score S_pis obtained, and return the optimum {right arrow over (P)}. Each time new data is obtained, a new score from new data is created and a new optimum {right arrow over (P)} value is calculated. This newly calculated vector {right arrow over (P)} could be used for transforming the input values, meaning: {right arrow over (P)}_new≡{right arrow over (P)}_optimum.

[0040] In embodiments of the present invention, the optimum coefficients can be combined with the most recent vector such that: {right arrow over (P)}_new≡{right arrow over (P)}_previous+K({right arrow over (P)}_optimum−{right arrow over (P)}_previous) wherein K<1.

[0041] As a new set of data points arrives, a new optimum {right arrow over (P)} can be recalculated.

[0042] Once a set of coefficients is calculated, a set of input values can be obtained (e.g., a recipe) for a desired set of output values. More specifically, from a set of desired values, a set of transformed input values, {right arrow over (X)}^i′, can be obtained by reversing the predictive model (e.g., the input/output dependence model 403). The transformed input values can then be reverse transformed using the coefficients {right arrow over (P)} to obtain the input value to produce the desired output values.

[0043] In the above-described embodiments, the raw input values are transformed using the calculated coefficients. The transformation is required to account for the dependencies among input parameters as graphically illustrated in FIG. 6. More specifically, a surface of a wafer having five regions with varying degrees of roughness is to be polished by a CMP process. The goal is to achieve a flat surface depicted by a dotted line in FIG. 6. In conventional techniques, one region would be polished without regard to the other regions. However, polishing one region can affect the polishing of another region (e.g., when an offset is applied in region 1 in order to bring the height in region 1 down to the broken line, the height in region 2 is also influenced by the changes of region 1). Using the embodiments of the present invention, these dependencies are accounted for.

[0044] An example embodiment of the computer in which embodiments of the present invention operate (e.g., the various components described in FIG. 4) is described below in connection with FIGS. 7-8. FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram of one example of the internal hardware 713 of a computer configured to perform embodiments of the present invention. A bus 756 serves as the main information highway interconnecting various components therein. CPU 758 is the central processing unit of the internal hardware 713, performing calculations and logic operations required to execute embodiments of the present invention as well as other programs. Read only memory (ROM) 760 and random access memory (RAM) 762 constitute the main memory. Disk controller 764 interfaces one or more disk drives to the system bus 756. These disk drives are, for example, floppy disk drives 770, or CD ROM or DVD (digital video disks) drives 766, or internal or external hard drives 768. These various disk drives and disk controllers are optional devices.

[0045] A display interface 772 interfaces display 748 and permits information from the bus 756 to be displayed on display 748. Communications with external devices, such as the other components of the system described above, occur utilizing, for example, communication port 774. Optical fibers and/or electrical cables and/or conductors and/or optical communication (e.g., infrared, and the like) and/or wireless communication (e.g., radio frequency (RF), and the like) can be used as the transport medium between the external devices and communication port 774. Peripheral interface 754 interfaces the keyboard 750 and mouse 752, permitting input data to be transmitted to bus 756. In addition to these components, the internal hardware 713 also optionally includes an infrared transmitter and/or infrared receiver. Infrared transmitters are optionally utilized when the computer system is used in conjunction with one or more of the processing components/stations/modules that transmit/receive data via infrared signal transmission. Instead of utilizing an infrared transmitter or infrared receiver, the computer system may also optionally use a low power radio transmitter 780 and/or a low power radio receiver 782. The low power radio transmitter transmits the signal for reception by components of the production process, and receives signals from the components via the low power radio receiver. The low power radio transmitter and/or receiver are standard devices in industry.

[0046] Although the computer in FIG. 7 is illustrated having a single processor, a single hard disk drive and a single local memory, the analyzer is optionally suitably equipped with any multitude or combination of processors or storage devices. For example, the computer may be replaced by, or combined with, any suitable processing system operative in accordance with the principles of embodiments of the present invention, including sophisticated calculators, and hand-held, laptop/notebook, mini, mainframe and super computers, as well as processing system network combinations of the same.

[0047] FIG. 8 is an illustration of an example computer readable memory medium 884 utilizable for storing computer readable code or instructions. As one example, medium 884 may be used with disk drives illustrated in FIG. 7. Typically, memory media such as floppy disks, or a CD ROM, or a digital video disk will contain, for example, a multi-byte locale for a single byte language and the program information for controlling the modeler to enable the computer to perform the functions described herein. Alternatively, ROM 760 and/or RAM 762 illustrated in FIG. 7 can also be used to store the program information that is used to instruct the central processing unit 758 to perform the operations associated with various automated processes of the present invention. Other examples of suitable computer readable media for storing information include magnetic, electronic, or optical (including holographic) storage, some combination thereof, etc.

[0048] In general, it should be emphasized that the various components of embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in hardware, software or a combination thereof. In such embodiments, the various components and steps would be implemented in hardware and/or software to perform the functions of embodiments of the present invention. Any presently available or future developed computer software language and/or hardware components can be employed in such embodiments of the present invention. For example, at least some of the functionality mentioned above could be implemented using Visual Basic, C, C++, or any assembly language appropriate in view of the processor(s) being used. It could also be written in an interpretive environment such as Java and transported to multiple destinations to various users.

[0049] The many features and advantages of embodiments of the present invention are apparent from the detailed specification, and thus, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all such features and advantages of the invention which fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and variations will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation illustrated and described, and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention. For instance, output values can be transformed similar to the transform performed on the input parameters, and operations can be performed on the transformed output values similar to those performed on the transformed input parameters.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A computer implemented method for controlling a manufacturing apparatus, the method comprising:

(a) identifying at least one input, the at least one input causing a change in at least two of a plurality of outputs;

(b) storing values of the identified inputs and corresponding empirical output values along with predicted output values, wherein the predicted output values are calculated based on, in part, the values of the identified inputs;

(c) calculating a set of transform coefficients by minimizing a score equation that is a function of, in part, differences between one or more of the empirical output values and their corresponding predicted output values, wherein the score equation is:

S_{p} = \sum_{i, k} {W_{i, k} (y_{actual}^{i k} - y_{predicted}^{i k} ({\vec{X}}^{i^{'}} ({\vec{X}}^{i}, \vec{P})))}^{2}

where:

i—number of wafer;

k—number of output;

y_actual—an empirical output value;

y_predicted—a predicted output value, as calculated based on transformed inputs for a particular wafer i ({right arrow over (X)}^i′)

{right arrow over (X)}^i′=(X₁^i′,X₂^i′,X₃^i′) is transformed input values in a vector format; ({right arrow over (X)}^i′)=(X₁^i′,X₂^i′,X₃^i′) for wafer i together with the transformation parameters ({right arrow over (P)}), to thereby calculate an optimal value of P;

(d) calculating one or more input values for one or more desired output values based on, in part, the calculated set of transform coefficients; and

(e) communicating the transformed input values of (d) to a manufacturing apparatus.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising;

collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values;

calculating a new set of coefficients {right arrow over (P)}_new; and

using the new set of coefficients as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising;

collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values;

calculating a new set of coefficients as

{right arrow over (P)}_new≡{right arrow over (P)}_previous+K({right arrow over (P)}_optimum−{right arrow over (P)}_previous),

wherein K<1 and {right arrow over (P)}_previousis a previously calculated optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}; and

using the new set of coefficients as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

4. A computer implemented system for controlling a manufacturing apparatus, the system comprising:

(a) means for identifying at least one input, the at least one input causing a change in at least two of a plurality of outputs;

(b) a memory device configured to store values of the identified inputs and corresponding empirical output values along with predicted output values, wherein the predicted output values are calculated based on, in part, the values of the identified inputs;

(c) means for calculating a set of transform coefficients by minimizing a score equation that is a function of, in part, differences between one or more of the empirical output values and their corresponding predicted output values, wherein the score equation is:

S_{p} = \sum_{i, k} {W_{i, k} (y_{actual}^{i k} - y_{predicted}^{i k} ({\vec{X}}^{i^{'}} ({\vec{X}}^{i}, \vec{P})))}^{2}

where:

i—number of wafer;

k—number of output;

y_actual—an empirical output value;

y_predicted—a predicted output value, as calculated based on transformed inputs for a particular wafer i ({right arrow over (X)}^i′)

{right arrow over (X)}^i′=(X₁^i′,X₂^i′,X₃^i′) is transformed input values in a vector format; {right arrow over (X)}ⁱ=(X₁ⁱ,X₂ⁱ,X₃ⁱ) for wafer i together with the transformation parameters {right arrow over (P)}, to thereby calculate an optimal value of {right arrow over (P)};

(d) means for calculating one or more input values for one or more desired output values based on, in part, the calculated set of transform coefficients; and

(e) means for communicating the transformed input values of (d) to a manufacturing apparatus.

5. The system of claim 4, further comprising:

means for collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values; and

means for calculating a new set of coefficients {right arrow over (P)}_new, wherein the new set of coefficients is defined as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

6. The system of claim 4, further comprising:

means for collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values; and

means for calculating a new set of coefficients as

{right arrow over (P)}_new≡{right arrow over (P)}_previous+K({right arrow over (P)}_optimum−{right arrow over (P)}_previous),

wherein K<1 and {right arrow over (P)}_previousis a previously calculated optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}, wherein the new set of coefficients is defined as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

7. A computer readable medium for storing instructions being executed by one or more computers, the instructions directing the one or more computers to perform a method for predicting output characteristics of a device produced by a manufacturing apparatus, the method comprising:

(a) identifying at least one input, the at least one input causing a change in at least two of a plurality of outputs;

S_{p} = \sum_{i, k} {W_{i, k} (y_{actual}^{i k} - y_{predicted}^{i k} ({\vec{X}}^{i^{'}} ({\vec{X}}^{i}, \vec{P})))}^{2}

where:

i—number of wafer;

k—number of output;

y_actual—an empirical output value;

y_predicted—a predicted output value, as calculated based on transformed inputs for a particular wafer i ({right arrow over (X)}^i′)

(d) calculating one or more input values for one or more desired output values based on, in part, the calculated set of transform coefficients; and

(e) communicating the transformed input values of (d) to a manufacturing apparatus.

8. The medium of claim 7, wherein the method further comprises:

collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values;

calculating a new set of coefficients {right arrow over (P)}_new; and

using the new set of coefficients as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

9. The medium of claim 7, wherein the method further comprises:

collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values;

calculating a new set of coefficients as

{right arrow over (P)}_new≡{right arrow over (P)}_previous+K({right arrow over (P)}_optimum−{right arrow over (P)}_previous),

wherein K<1 and {right arrow over (P)}_previousis a previously calculated optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}; and

using the new set of coefficients as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

10. A computer implemented method for controlling a manufacturing apparatus, the method comprising:

(a) identifying at least one input that causes a change in at least two of a plurality of outputs;

(b) storing values of the identified inputs and corresponding empirical output values;

(d) calculating a set of transform coefficients by minimizing a score equation that is a function of, in part, differences between one or more of the empirical output values and their corresponding predicted output values;

(e) calculating one or more input values for one or more desired output values based on, in part, the calculated set of transform coefficients; and

(f) providing the transformed input values of (e) to a manufacturing apparatus.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the score function is:

S_{p} = \sum_{i, k} {W_{i, k} (y_{actual}^{i k} - y_{predicted}^{i k} ({\vec{X}}^{i^{'}} ({\vec{X}}^{i}, \vec{P})))}^{2}

where:

i—number of wafer;

k—number of output;

y_actual—an empirical output value;

y_predicted—a predicted output value, as calculated based on transformed inputs for a particular wafer i ({right arrow over (X)}^i′)

12. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values;

calculating a new set of coefficients {right arrow over (P)}_new; and

using the new set of coefficients as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

13. The method of claim 10 further comprising:

collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values; and

calculating a new set of coefficients based on the additional empirical data.

14. The method of claim 13, further comprising

calculating the new set of coefficients using:

{right arrow over (P)}_new≡{right arrow over (P)}_previous+K({right arrow over (P)}_optimum−{right arrow over (P)}_previous),

wherein K<1 and {right arrow over (P)}_previousis a previously calculated optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}; and

using the new set of coefficients as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

15. A computer implemented system for controlling a manufacturing apparatus, the system comprising:

(a) means for identifying at least one input that causes a change in at least two of a plurality of outputs;

(d) means for calculating one or more input values for one or more desired output values based on, in part, the calculated set of transform coefficients; and

(e) means for communicating the transformed input values of (d) to a manufactoring apparatus.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the score equation is:

S_{p} = \sum_{i, k} {W_{i, k} (y_{actual}^{i k} - y_{predicted}^{i k} ({\vec{X}}^{i^{'}} ({\vec{X}}^{i}, \vec{P})))}^{2}

where:

i—number of wafer;

k—number of output;

y_actual—an empirical output value;

y_predicted—a predicted output value, as calculated based on transformed inputs for a particular wafer i ({right arrow over (X)}^i′)

17. The system of claim 15, further comprising:

means for collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values; and

means for calculating a new set of coefficients {right arrow over (P)}_new, wherein the new set of coefficients is defined as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

18. The system of claim 15, further comprising:

means for collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values; and

means for calculating a new set of coefficients based on the additional empirical data.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the means for calculating is further configured to use the following equation in calculating the new of coefficients:

{right arrow over (P)}_new≡{right arrow over (P)}_previous+K({right arrow over (P)}_optimum−{right arrow over (P)}_previous),

20. A computer readable medium for storing instructions being executed by one or more computers, the instructions directing the one or more computers to perform a method for predicting output characteristics of a device produced by a manufacturing apparatus, the method comprising:

(a) identifying at least one input that causes a change in at least two of a plurality of outputs;

(b) storing values of the identified inputs and corresponding empirical output values;

(e) calculating one or more input values for one or more desired output values based on, in part, the calculated set of transform coefficients; and

(f) communicating the transformed input values of (d) to a manufacturing apparatus.

21. The medium of claim 20, wherein the score function is:

S_{p} = \sum_{i, k} {W_{i, k} (y_{actual}^{i k} - y_{predicted}^{i k} ({\vec{X}}^{i^{'}} ({\vec{X}}^{i}, \vec{P})))}^{2}

where:

i—number of wafer;

k—number of output;

y_actual—an empirical output value;

y_predicted—a predicted output value, as calculated based on transformed inputs for a particular wafer i ({right arrow over (X)}^i′)

22. The medium of claim 20, wherein the method further comprises:

collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values;

calculating a new set of coefficients {right arrow over (P)}_new; and

using the new set of coefficients as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

23. The medium of claim 20, wherein the method further comprises:

collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values;

calculating a new set of coefficients as

{right arrow over (P)}_new≡{right arrow over (P)}_previous+K({right arrow over (P)}_optimum−{right arrow over (P)}_previous),

wherein K<1 and {right arrow over (P)}_previousis a previously calculated optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}; and

using the new set of coefficients as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

Patent Citations (435)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US3205485(A)	1965-09-01	Noltingk	Applicant
US3229198(A)	1966-01-01	Libby	Applicant
US3767900(A)	1973-10-01	Chao et al.	Applicant
US3920965(A)	1975-11-01	Sohrwardy	Applicant
US4000458(A)	1976-12-01	Miller et al.	Applicant
US4207520(A)	1980-06-01	Flora et al.	Applicant
US4209744(A)	1980-06-01	Gerasimov et al.	Applicant
US4302721(A)	1981-11-01	Urbanek et al.	Applicant
US4368510(A)	1983-01-01	Anderson	Applicant
US4609870(A)	1986-09-01	Lale et al.	Applicant
US4616308(A)	1986-10-01	Morshedi et al.	Applicant
US4663703(A)	1987-05-01	Axelby et al.	Applicant
US4698766(A)	1987-10-01	Entwistle et al.	Applicant
US4750141(A)	1988-06-01	Judell et al.	Applicant
US4755753(A)	1988-07-01	Chern	Applicant
US4757259(A)	1988-07-01	Charpentier	Applicant
US4796194(A)	1989-01-01	Atherton	Applicant
US4901218(A)	1990-02-01	Cornwell	Applicant
US4938600(A)	1990-07-01	Into	Applicant
US4957605(A)	1990-09-01	Hurwitt et al.	Applicant
US4967381(A)	1990-10-01	Lane et al.	Applicant
US5089970(A)	1992-02-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US5108570(A)	1992-04-01	Wang	Applicant
US5208765(A)	1993-05-01	Turnbull	Applicant
US5220517(A)	1993-06-01	Sierk et al.	Applicant
US5226118(A)	1993-07-01	Baker et al.	Applicant
US5231585(A)	1993-07-01	Kobayashi et al.	Applicant
US5236868(A)	1993-08-01	Nulman	Applicant
US5240552(A)	1993-08-01	Yu et al.	Applicant
US5260868(A)	1993-11-01	Gupta et al.	Applicant
US5270222(A)	1993-12-01	Moslehi	Applicant
US5283141(A)	1994-02-01	Yoon et al.	Applicant
US5295242(A)	1994-03-01	Mashruwala et al.	Applicant
US5309221(A)	1994-05-01	Fischer et al.	Applicant
US5329463(A)	1994-07-01	Sierk et al.	Applicant
US5338630(A)	1994-08-01	Yoon et al.	Applicant
US5347446(A)	1994-09-01	Iino et al.	Applicant
US5367624(A)	1994-11-01	Cooper	Applicant
US5369544(A)	1994-11-01	Mastrangelo	Applicant
US5375064(A)	1994-12-01	Bollinger	Applicant
US5398336(A)	1995-03-01	Tantry et al.	Applicant
US5402367(A)	1995-03-01	Sullivan et al.	Applicant
US5408405(A)	1995-04-01	Mozumder et al.	Applicant
US5410473(A)	1995-04-01	Kaneko et al.	Applicant
US5420796(A)	1995-05-01	Weling et al.	Applicant
US5427878(A)	1995-06-01	Corliss	Applicant
US5444837(A)	1995-08-01	Bomans et al.	Applicant
US5469361(A)	1995-11-01	Moyne	Applicant
US5485082(A)	1996-01-01	Wisspeintner et al.	Applicant
US5490097(A)	1996-02-01	Swenson et al.	Applicant
US5495417(A)	1996-02-01	Fuduka et al.	Applicant
US5497316(A)	1996-03-01	Sierk et al.	Applicant
US5497381(A)	1996-03-01	O'Donoghue et al.	Applicant
US5503707(A)	1996-04-01	Maung et al.	Applicant
US5508947(A)	1996-04-01	Sierk et al.	Applicant
US5511005(A)	1996-04-01	Abbe et al.	Applicant
US5519605(A)	1996-05-01	Cawlfield	Applicant
US5525808(A)	1996-06-01	Irie et al.	Applicant
US5526293(A)	1996-06-01	Mozumder et al.	Applicant
US5534289(A)	1996-07-01	Bilder et al.	Applicant
US5541510(A)	1996-07-01	Danielson	Applicant
US5546312(A)	1996-08-01	Mozumder et al.	Applicant
US5553195(A)	1996-09-01	Meijer	Applicant
US5586039(A)	1996-12-01	Hirsch et al.	Applicant
US5599423(A)	1997-02-01	Parker et al.	Applicant
US5602492(A)	1997-02-01	Cresswell et al.	Applicant
US5603707(A)	1997-02-01	Trombetta et al.	Applicant
US5617023(A)	1997-04-01	Skalski	Applicant
US5627083(A)	1997-05-01	Tounai	Applicant
US5629216(A)	1997-05-01	Wijaranakula et al.	Applicant
US5642296(A)	1997-06-01	Saxena	Applicant
US5646870(A)	1997-07-01	Krivokapic et al.	Applicant
US5649169(A)	1997-07-01	Berezin et al.	Applicant
US5654903(A)	1997-08-01	Reitman et al.	Applicant
US5655951(A)	1997-08-01	Meikle et al.	Applicant
US5657254(A)	1997-08-01	Sierk et al.	Applicant
US5661669(A)	1997-08-01	Mozumder et al.	Applicant
US5663797(A)	1997-09-01	Sandhu	Applicant
US5664987(A)	1997-09-01	Renteln	Applicant
US5665199(A)	1997-09-01	Sahota et al.	Applicant
US5665214(A)	1997-09-01	Iturralde	Applicant
US5666297(A)	1997-09-01	Britt et al.	Applicant
US5667424(A)	1997-09-01	Pan	Applicant
US5674787(A)	1997-10-01	Zhao et al.	Applicant
US5694325(A)	1997-12-01	Fukuda et al.	Applicant
US5695810(A)	1997-12-01	Dubin et al.	Applicant
US5698989(A)	1997-12-01	Nulman	Applicant
US5719495(A)	1998-02-01	Moslehi	Applicant
US5719796(A)	1998-02-01	Chen	Applicant
US5735055(A)	1998-04-01	Hochbein et al.	Applicant
US5740429(A)	1998-04-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US5751582(A)	1998-05-01	Saxena et al.	Applicant
US5754297(A)	1998-05-01	Nulman	Applicant
US5761064(A)	1998-06-01	La et al.	Applicant
US5761065(A)	1998-06-01	Kittler et al.	Applicant
US5764543(A)	1998-06-01	Kennedy	Applicant
US5777901(A)	1998-07-01	Berezin et al.	Applicant
US5787021(A)	1998-07-01	Samaha	Applicant
US5787269(A)	1998-07-01	Hyodo	Applicant
US5808303(A)	1998-09-01	Schlagheck et al.	Applicant
US5812407(A)	1998-09-01	Sato et al.	Applicant
US5823854(A)	1998-10-01	Chen	Applicant
US5824599(A)	1998-10-01	Schacham-Diamand et al.	Applicant
US5825356(A)	1998-10-01	Habib et al.	Applicant
US5825913(A)	1998-10-01	Rostami et al.	Applicant
US5828778(A)	1998-10-01	Hagi et al.	Applicant
US5831851(A)	1998-11-01	Eastburn et al.	Applicant
US5832224(A)	1998-11-01	Fehskens et al.	Applicant
US5838595(A)	1998-11-01	Sullivan et al.	Applicant
US5838951(A)	1998-11-01	Song	Applicant
US5844554(A)	1998-12-01	Geller et al.	Applicant
US5857258(A)	1999-01-01	Penzes et al.	Applicant
US5859777(A)	1999-01-01	Yokoyama et al.	Applicant
US5859964(A)	1999-01-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US5859975(A)	1999-01-01	Brewer et al.	Applicant
US5862054(A)	1999-01-01	Li	Applicant
US5863807(A)	1999-01-01	Jang et al.	Applicant
US5867389(A)	1999-02-01	Hamada et al.	Applicant
US5870306(A)	1999-02-01	Harada	Applicant
US5871805(A)	1999-02-01	Lemelson	Applicant
US5883437(A)	1999-03-01	Maruyama et al.	Applicant
US5889991(A)	1999-03-01	Consolatti et al.	Applicant
US5901313(A)	1999-05-01	Wolfe et al.	Applicant
US5903455(A)	1999-05-01	Sharpe, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5910011(A)	1999-06-01	Cruse	Applicant
US5910846(A)	1999-06-01	Sandhu	Applicant
US5912678(A)	1999-06-01	Saxena et al.	Applicant
US5916016(A)	1999-06-01	Bothra	Applicant
US5923553(A)	1999-07-01	Yi	Applicant
US5926690(A)	1999-07-01	Toprac et al.	Applicant
US5930138(A)	1999-07-01	Lin et al.	Applicant
US5940300(A)	1999-08-01	Ozaki	Applicant
US5943237(A)	1999-08-01	Van Boxem	Applicant
US5943550(A)	1999-08-01	Fulford, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5960185(A)	1999-09-01	Nguyen	Applicant
US5960214(A)	1999-09-01	Sharpe, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5961369(A)	1999-10-01	Bartels et al.	Applicant
US5963881(A)	1999-10-01	Kahn et al.	Applicant
US5975994(A)	1999-11-01	Sandhu et al.	Applicant
US5978751(A)	1999-11-01	Pence et al.	Applicant
US5982920(A)	1999-11-01	Tobin, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US6002989(A)	1999-12-01	Shiba et al.	Applicant
US6012048(A)	2000-01-01	Gustin et al.	Applicant
US6017771(A)	2000-01-01	Yang et al.	Applicant
US6036349(A)	2000-03-01	Gombar	Applicant
US6037664(A)	2000-03-01	Zhao et al.	Applicant
US6041263(A)	2000-03-01	Boston et al.	Applicant
US6041270(A)	2000-03-01	Steffan et al.	Applicant
US6054379(A)	2000-04-01	Yau et al.	Applicant
US6059636(A)	2000-05-01	Inaba et al.	Applicant
US6064759(A)	2000-05-01	Buckley et al.	Applicant
US6072313(A)	2000-06-01	Li et al.	Applicant
US6074443(A)	2000-06-01	Venkatesh et al.	Applicant
US6077412(A)	2000-06-01	Ting et al.	Applicant
US6078845(A)	2000-06-01	Friedman	Applicant
US6094688(A)	2000-07-01	Mellen-Garnett et al.	Applicant
US6096649(A)	2000-08-01	Jang	Applicant
US6097887(A)	2000-08-01	Hardikar et al.	Applicant
US6100195(A)	2000-08-01	Chan et al.	Applicant
US6108092(A)	2000-08-01	Sandhu	Applicant
US6111634(A)	2000-08-01	Pecen et al.	Applicant
US6112130(A)	2000-08-01	Fukuda et al.	Applicant
US6113462(A)	2000-09-01	Yang	Applicant
US6114238(A)	2000-09-01	Liao	Applicant
US6127263(A)	2000-10-01	Parikh	Applicant
US6128016(A)	2000-10-01	Coelho et al.	Applicant
US6136163(A)	2000-10-01	Cheung et al.	Applicant
US6141660(A)	2000-10-01	Bach et al.	Applicant
US6143646(A)	2000-11-01	Wetzel	Applicant
US6148099(A)	2000-11-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US6148239(A)	2000-11-01	Funk et al.	Applicant
US6148246(A)	2000-11-01	Kawazome	Applicant
US6150270(A)	2000-11-01	Matsuda et al.	Applicant
US6157864(A)	2000-12-01	Schwenke et al.	Applicant
US6159075(A)	2000-12-01	Zhang	Applicant
US6159644(A)	2000-12-01	Satoh et al.	Applicant
US6161054(A)	2000-12-01	Rosenthal et al.	Applicant
US6169931(B1)	2001-01-01	Runnels	Applicant
US6172756(B1)	2001-01-01	Chalmers et al.	Applicant
US6173240(B1)	2001-01-01	Sepulveda et al.	Applicant
US6175777(B1)	2001-01-01	Kim	Applicant
US6178390(B1)	2001-01-01	Jun	Applicant
US6181013(B1)	2001-01-01	Liu et al.	Applicant
US6183345(B1)	2001-02-01	Kamono et al.	Applicant
US6185324(B1)	2001-02-01	Ishihara et al.	Applicant
US6191864(B1)	2001-02-01	Sandhu	Applicant
US6192291(B1)	2001-02-01	Kwon	Applicant
US6197604(B1)	2001-03-01	Miller et al.	Applicant
US6204165(B1)	2001-03-01	Ghoshal	Applicant
US6210983(B1)	2001-04-01	Atchison et al.	Applicant
US6211094(B1)	2001-04-01	Jun et al.	Applicant
US6212961(B1)	2001-04-01	Dvir	Applicant
US6214734(B1)	2001-04-01	Bothra et al.	Applicant
US6217412(B1)	2001-04-01	Campbell et al.	Applicant
US6219711(B1)	2001-04-01	Chari	Applicant
US6222936(B1)	2001-04-01	Phan et al.	Applicant
US6226563(B1)	2001-05-01	Lim	Applicant
US6226792(B1)	2001-05-01	Goiffon et al.	Applicant
US6228280(B1)	2001-05-01	Li et al.	Applicant
US6230069(B1)	2001-05-01	Campbell et al.	Applicant
US6236903(B1)	2001-05-01	Kim et al.	Applicant
US6237050(B1)	2001-05-01	Kim et al.	Applicant
US6240330(B1)	2001-05-01	Kurtzberg et al.	Applicant
US6240331(B1)	2001-05-01	Yun	Applicant
US6245581(B1)	2001-06-01	Bonser et al.	Applicant
US6246972(B1)	2001-06-01	Klimasauskas	Applicant
US6248602(B1)	2001-06-01	Bode et al.	Applicant
US6249712(B1)	2001-06-01	Boiquaye	Applicant
US6252412(B1)	2001-06-01	Talbot et al.	Applicant
US6253366(B1)	2001-06-01	Mutschler, III	Applicant
US6259160(B1)	2001-07-01	Lopatin et al.	Applicant
US6263255(B1)	2001-07-01	Tan et al.	Applicant
US6268270(B1)	2001-07-01	Scheid et al.	Applicant
US6271670(B1)	2001-08-01	Caffey	Applicant
US6276989(B1)	2001-08-01	Campbell et al.	Applicant
US6277014(B1)	2001-08-01	Chen et al.	Applicant
US6278899(B1)	2001-08-01	Piche et al.	Applicant
US6280289(B1)	2001-08-01	Wiswesser et al.	Applicant
US6281127(B1)	2001-08-01	Shue	Applicant
US6284622(B1)	2001-09-01	Campbell et al.	Applicant
US6287879(B1)	2001-09-01	Gonzales et al.	Applicant
US6290572(B1)	2001-09-01	Hofmann	Applicant
US6291367(B1)	2001-09-01	Kelkar	Applicant
US6292708(B1)	2001-09-01	Allen et al.	Applicant
US6298274(B1)	2001-10-01	Inoue	Applicant
US6298470(B1)	2001-10-01	Breiner et al.	Applicant
US6303395(B1)	2001-10-01	Nulman	Applicant
US6304999(B1)	2001-10-01	Toprac et al.	Applicant
US6307628(B1)	2001-10-01	Lu et al.	Applicant
US6314379(B1)	2001-11-01	Hu et al.	Applicant
US6317643(B1)	2001-11-01	Dmochowski	Applicant
US6320655(B1)	2001-11-01	Matsushita et al.	Applicant
US6324481(B1)	2001-11-01	Atchison et al.	Applicant
US6334807(B1)	2002-01-01	Lebel et al.	Applicant
US6336841(B1)	2002-01-01	Chang	Applicant
US6339727(B1)	2002-01-01	Ladd	Applicant
US6340602(B1)	2002-01-01	Johnson et al.	Applicant
US6345288(B1)	2002-02-01	Reed et al.	Applicant
US6345315(B1)	2002-02-01	Mishra	Applicant
US6346426(B1)	2002-02-01	Toprac et al.	Applicant
US6355559(B1)	2002-03-01	Havemann et al.	Applicant
US6360133(B1)	2002-03-01	Campbell et al.	Applicant
US6360184(B1)	2002-03-01	Jacquez	Applicant
US6363294(B1)	2002-03-01	Coronel et al.	Applicant
US6366934(B1)	2002-04-01	Cheng et al.	Applicant
US6368879(B1)	2002-04-01	Toprac	Applicant
US6368883(B1)	2002-04-01	Bode et al.	Applicant
US6368884(B1)	2002-04-01	Goodwin et al.	Applicant
US6373033(B1)	2002-04-01	de Waard et al.	Applicant
US6379980(B1)	2002-04-01	Toprac	Applicant
US6381564(B1)	2002-04-01	David et al.	Applicant
US6388253(B1)	2002-05-01	Su	Applicant
US6389491(B1)	2002-05-01	Jacobson et al.	Applicant
US6391780(B1)	2002-05-01	Shih et al.	Applicant
US6395152(B1)	2002-05-01	Wang	Applicant
US6397114(B1)	2002-05-01	Eryurek et al.	Applicant
US6400162(B1)	2002-06-01	Mallory et al.	Applicant
US6405096(B1)	2002-06-01	Toprac et al.	Applicant
US6405144(B1)	2002-06-01	Toprac et al.	Applicant
US6417014(B1)	2002-07-01	Lam et al.	Applicant
US6427093(B1)	2002-07-01	Toprac	Applicant
US6432728(B1)	2002-08-01	Tai et al.	Applicant
US6435952(B1)	2002-08-01	Boyd et al.	Applicant
US6438438(B1)	2002-08-01	Takagi et al.	Applicant
US6440295(B1)	2002-08-01	Wang	Applicant
US6442496(B1)	2002-08-01	Pasadyn et al.	Applicant
US6449524(B1)	2002-09-01	Miller et al.	Applicant
US6455415(B1)	2002-09-01	Lopatin et al.	Applicant
US6455937(B1)	2002-09-01	Cunningham	Applicant
US6465263(B1)	2002-10-01	Coss, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US6470230(B1)	2002-10-01	Toprac et al.	Applicant
US6479902(B1)	2002-11-01	Lopatin et al.	Applicant
US6479990(B2)	2002-11-01	Mednikov et al.	Applicant
US6482660(B2)	2002-11-01	Conchieri et al.	Applicant
US6484064(B1)	2002-11-01	Campbell	Applicant
US6486492(B1)	2002-11-01	Su	Applicant
US6492281(B1)	2002-12-01	Song et al.	Applicant
US6495452(B1)	2002-12-01	Shih	Applicant
US6503839(B2)	2003-01-01	Gonzales et al.	Applicant
US6515368(B1)	2003-02-01	Lopatin et al.	Applicant
US6517413(B1)	2003-02-01	Hu et al.	Applicant
US6517414(B1)	2003-02-01	Tobin et al.	Applicant
US6528409(B1)	2003-03-01	Lopatin et al.	Applicant
US6529789(B1)	2003-03-01	Campbell et al.	Applicant
US6532555(B1)	2003-03-01	Miller et al.	Applicant
US6535783(B1)	2003-03-01	Miller et al.	Applicant
US6537912(B1)	2003-03-01	Agarwal	Applicant
US6540591(B1)	2003-04-01	Pasadyn et al.	Applicant
US6541401(B1)	2003-04-01	Herner et al.	Applicant
US6546508(B1)	2003-04-01	Sonderman et al.	Applicant
US6556881(B1)	2003-04-01	Miller	Applicant
US6560504(B1)	2003-05-01	Goodwin et al.	Applicant
US6563308(B2)	2003-05-01	Nagano et al.	Applicant
US6567717(B2)	2003-05-01	Krivokapic et al.	Applicant
US6580958(B1)	2003-06-01	Takano	Applicant
US6587744(B1)	2003-07-01	Stoddard et al.	Applicant
US6590179(B2)	2003-07-01	Tanaka et al.	Applicant
US6604012(B1)	2003-08-01	Cho et al.	Applicant
US6605549(B2)	2003-08-01	Leu et al.	Applicant
US6607976(B2)	2003-08-01	Chen et al.	Applicant
US6609946(B1)	2003-08-01	Tran	Applicant
US6616513(B1)	2003-09-01	Osterheld	Applicant
US6618692(B2)	2003-09-01	Takahashi et al.	Applicant
US6624075(B1)	2003-09-01	Lopatin et al.	Applicant
US6625497(B2)	2003-09-01	Fairbairn et al.	Applicant
US6630741(B1)	2003-10-01	Lopatin et al.	Applicant
US6640151(B1)	2003-10-01	Somekh et al.	Applicant
US6652355(B2)	2003-11-01	Wiswesser et al.	Applicant
US6660633(B1)	2003-12-01	Lopatin et al.	Applicant
US6678570(B1)	2004-01-01	Pasadyn et al.	Applicant
US6708074(B1)	2004-03-01	Chi et al.	Applicant
US6708075(B2)	2004-03-01	Sonderman et al.	Applicant
US6725402(B1)	2004-04-01	Coss, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US6728587(B2)	2004-04-01	Goldman et al.	Applicant
US6735492(B2)	2004-05-01	Conrad et al.	Applicant
US6751518(B1)	2004-06-01	Sonderman et al.	Applicant
US6754542(B1)	2004-06-01	Tanaka	Examiner
US6774998(B1)	2004-08-01	Wright et al.	Applicant
US2001/0001755(A1)	2001-05-01	Sandhu et al.	Applicant
US2001/0003084(A1)	2001-06-01	Finarov	Applicant
US2001/0006873(A1)	2001-07-01	Moore	Applicant
US2001/0030366(A1)	2001-10-01	Nakano et al.	Applicant
US2001/0039462(A1)	2001-11-01	Mendez et al.	Applicant
US2001/0040997(A1)	2001-11-01	Tsap et al.	Applicant
US2001/0042690(A1)	2001-11-01	Talieh	Applicant
US2001/0044667(A1)	2001-11-01	Nakano et al.	Applicant
US2002/0032499(A1)	2002-03-01	Wilson et al.	Applicant
US2002/0058460(A1)	2002-05-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US2002/0070126(A1)	2002-06-01	Sato et al.	Applicant
US2002/0077031(A1)	2002-06-01	Johannson et al.	Applicant
US2002/0081951(A1)	2002-06-01	Boyd et al.	Applicant
US2002/0089676(A1)	2002-07-01	Pecen et al.	Applicant
US2002/0102853(A1)	2002-08-01	Li et al.	Applicant
US2002/0107599(A1)	2002-08-01	Patel et al.	Applicant
US2002/0107604(A1)	2002-08-01	Riley et al.	Applicant
US2002/0113039(A1)	2002-08-01	Mok et al.	Applicant
US2002/0127950(A1)	2002-09-01	Hirose et al.	Applicant
US2002/0128805(A1)	2002-09-01	Goldman et al.	Applicant
US2002/0149359(A1)	2002-10-01	Crouzen et al.	Applicant
US2002/0165636(A1)	2002-11-01	Hasan	Applicant
US2002/0183986(A1)	2002-12-01	Stewart et al.	Applicant
US2002/0185658(A1)	2002-12-01	Inoue et al.	Applicant
US2002/0193899(A1)	2002-12-01	Shanmugasundram et al.	Applicant
US2002/0193902(A1)	2002-12-01	Shanmugasundram et al.	Applicant
US2002/0197745(A1)	2002-12-01	Shanmugasundram et al.	Applicant
US2002/0197934(A1)	2002-12-01	Paik	Applicant
US2002/0199082(A1)	2002-12-01	Shanmugasundram et al.	Applicant
US2003/0017256(A1)	2003-01-01	Shimane	Applicant
US2003/0020909(A1)	2003-01-01	Adams et al.	Applicant
US2003/0020928(A1)	2003-01-01	Ritzdorf et al.	Applicant
US2003/0154062(A1)	2003-08-01	Daft et al.	Applicant
CA2050247	1991-08-01		Applicant
CA2165847	1991-08-01		Applicant
CA2194855	1991-08-01		Applicant
EP397924(A1)	1990-11-01		Applicant
EP621522(A2)	1994-10-01		Applicant
EP747795(A2)	1996-12-01		Applicant
EP869652(A2)	1998-10-01		Applicant
EP877308(A2)	1998-11-01		Applicant
EP881040(A2)	1998-12-01		Applicant
EP895145(A1)	1999-02-01		Applicant
EP910123(A1)	1999-04-01		Applicant
EP932194(A1)	1999-07-01		Applicant
EP932195(A1)	1999-07-01		Applicant
EP1066925(A2)	2001-01-01		Applicant
EP1067757(A1)	2001-01-01		Applicant
EP1071128(A2)	2001-01-01		Applicant
EP1083470(A2)	2001-03-01		Applicant
EP1092505(A2)	2001-04-01		Applicant
EP1072967(A3)	2001-11-01		Applicant
EP1182526(A2)	2002-02-01		Applicant
GB2347885(A)	2000-09-01		Applicant
GB2363477(A)	2001-12-01		Applicant
GB2365215(A)	2002-02-01		Applicant
JP61-66104	1986-04-01		Applicant
JP61-171147	1986-08-01		Applicant
JP1-283934	1989-11-01		Applicant
JP3-202710	1991-09-01		Applicant
JP5-151231	1993-06-01		Applicant
JP5-216896	1993-08-01		Applicant
JP5-266029	1993-10-01		Applicant
JP6-110894	1994-04-01		Applicant
JP6-176994	1994-06-01		Applicant
JP6-184434	1994-07-01		Applicant
JP6-252236	1994-09-01		Applicant
JP6-260380	1994-09-01		Applicant
JP8-23166	1996-01-01		Applicant
JP8-50161	1996-02-01		Applicant
JP8-149583	1996-06-01		Applicant
JP8-304023	1996-11-01		Applicant
JP9-34535	1997-02-01		Applicant
JP9-246547	1997-09-01		Applicant
JP10-34522	1998-02-01		Applicant
JP10-173029	1998-06-01		Applicant
JP11-67853	1999-03-01		Applicant
JP11-126816	1999-05-01		Applicant
JP11-135601	1999-05-01		Applicant
JP2000-183001	2000-04-01		Applicant
JP2001-76982	2001-03-01		Applicant
JP2001-284299	2001-10-01		Applicant
JP2001-305108	2001-10-01		Applicant
JP2002-9030	2002-01-01		Applicant
JP2002-343754	2002-11-01		Applicant
TW434103	2001-05-01		Applicant
TW436383(B)	2001-05-01		Applicant
TW455938(B)	2001-09-01		Applicant
TW455976	2001-09-01		Applicant
WO95/34866	1995-12-01		Applicant
WO98/05066	1998-02-01		Applicant
WO98/45090	1998-10-01		Applicant
WO99/09371	1999-02-01		Applicant
WO99/25520	1999-05-01		Applicant
WO99/25520	1999-05-01		Applicant
WO99/59200	1999-11-01		Applicant
WO/00874	2000-01-01		Applicant
WO/05759	2000-02-01		Applicant
WO/35063	2000-06-01		Applicant
WO/54325	2000-09-01		Applicant
WO/79355(A1)	2000-12-01		Applicant
WO1/01205(A2)	2001-01-01		Applicant
WO1/11679(A1)	2001-02-01		Applicant
WO1/15865(A1)	2001-03-01		Applicant
WO1/18623(A1)	2001-03-01		Applicant
WO1/25865(A1)	2001-04-01		Applicant
WO1/33277(A1)	2001-05-01		Applicant
WO1/33501(A1)	2001-05-01		Applicant
WO1/52055(A3)	2001-07-01		Applicant
WO1/52319(A1)	2001-07-01		Applicant
WO1/57823(A2)	2001-08-01		Applicant
WO1/80306(A2)	2001-10-01		Applicant
WO2/17150(A1)	2002-02-01		Applicant
WO2/31613(A2)	2002-04-01		Applicant
WO2/31613(A3)	2002-04-01		Applicant
WO2/33737(A2)	2002-04-01		Applicant
WO2/074491(A1)	2002-09-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (197)

US 6,150,664, 11/2000, Su (withdrawn)Applicant
Boning, Duane et al. “Run by Run Control of Chemical- Mechanical Polishing.” IEEE Trans. Oct. 1996. vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 307-314.Applicant
Moyne, James et al. “A Run-to-Run Control Framework for VLSI Manufacturing.” Microelectronic Processing '93 Conference Proceedings. Sep. 1993.Applicant
Telfeyan, Roland et al. “Demonstration of a Process-Independent Run-to-Run Controller.” 187th Meeting of the Electrochemical Society. May 1995.Applicant
Moyne, James et al. “A Process-Independent Run-to-Run Controller and Its Application to Chemical-Mechanical Planarization.” SEMI/IEEE Adv. Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference. Aug. 15, 1995.Applicant
Moyne, James et al. “Adaptive Extensions to be a Multi-Branch Run-to-Run Controller for Plasma Etching.” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology. 1995.Applicant
Sachs, Emanuel et al. “Process Control System for VLSI Fabrication.”Applicant
Chaudhry, Nauman et al. “Active Controller: Utilizing Active Databases for Implementing Multi-Step Control of Semiconductor Manufacturing.” University of Michigan. pp. 1-24.Applicant
Chaudhry, Nauman et al. “Designing Databases with Fuzzy Data and Rules for Application to Discrete Control.” University of Michigan. pp. 1-21.Applicant
Chaudhry, Nauman A. et al. “A Design Methodology for Databases with Uncertain Data.” University of Michigan. pp. 1-14.Applicant
Khan, Kareemullah et al. “Run-to-Run Control of ITO Deposition Process.” University of Michigan. pp. 1-6.Applicant
Moyne, James et al. “Yield Improvement @ Contact Through Run-to-Run Control.”Applicant
Kim, Jiyoun et al. “Gradient and Radial Uniformity Control of a CMP Process Utilizing a Pre- and Post- Measurement Strategy.” University of Michigan.Applicant
Nov. 19, 2004. International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US03/36501.Applicant
IslamRaja, M. M., C. Chang, J. P. McVittie, M. A. Cappelli, and K. C. Saraswat. May/Jun. 1993. “Two Precursor Model for Low-Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition of Silicon Dioxide from Tetraethylorthosilicate.” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 720-726.Applicant
Kim, Eui Jung and William N. Gill. Jul. 1994. “Analytical Model for Chemical Vapor Deposition of SiO2 Films Using Tetraethoxysliane and Ozone”(Abstract). Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 140, Issues 3-4, pp. 315-326.Applicant
Guo, R.S, A. Chen, C.L. Tseng, I.K. Fong, A. Yang, C.L. Lee, C.H. Wu, S. Lin, S.J. Huang, Y.C. Lee, S.G. Chang, and M.Y. Lee. Jun. 16-17, 1998. “A Real-Time Equipment Monitoring and Fault Detection System.” Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology Workshop, pp. 111-121.Applicant
Lantz, Mikkel. 1999. “Equipment and APC Integration at AMD with Workstream.” IEEE, pp. 325-327.Applicant
Aug. 9, 2004. Written Opinion for PCT Serial No. PCT/US02/190623.Applicant
Aug. 18, 2004, International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT Serial. No. PCT/US02/19116.Applicant
Sep. 9, 2004. Written Opinion for PCT Serial. No. PCT/US02/21942.Applicant
Sep. 16, 2004. International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT Serial No. PCT/US02/24859.Applicant
Sun, S.C. 1998. “CVD and PVD Transition Metal Nitrides as Diffusion Barriers for Cu Metallization.” IEEE. pp. 243-246.Applicant
Tagami, M., A. Furuya, T. Onodera, and Y. Hayashi. 1999. “Layered Ta-nitrides (LTN) Barrier Film by Power Swing Sputtering (PSS) Technique for MOCVD-Cu Damascene Interconnects.” IEEE. pp. 635-638.Applicant
Yamagishi, H., Z. Tokei, G.P. Beyer, R. Donaton, H. Bender, T. Nogami, and K. Maex. 2000. “TEM/SEM Investigation and Electrical Evaluation of a Bottomless I-PVD TA(N) Barrier in Dual Damascene” (Abstract). Advanced Metallization Conference 2000. San Diego, CA.Applicant
Eisenbraun, Eric, Oscar van der Straten, Yu Zhu, Katharine Dovidenko, and Alain Kaloyeros. 2001. “Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) of Tantalum-Based Materials for Zero Thickness Copper Barrier Applications” (Abstract). IEEE. pp. 207-209.Applicant
Smith, S.R., K.E. Elers, T. Jacobs, V. Blaschke, and K. Pfeifer. 2001. “Physical and Electrical Characterization of ALD Tin Used as a Copper Diffusion Barrier in 0.25 mum, Dual Damascene Backend Structures” (Abstract). Advanced Metallization Conference 2001. Montreal, Quebec.Applicant
Kim, Y.T. and H. Sim. 2002. “Characteristics of Pulse Plasma Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of Tungsten Nitride Diffusion Barrier for Copper Interconnect” (Abstract). IEIC Technical Report. vol. 102, No. 178, pp. 115-118.Applicant
Elers, Kai-Erik, Ville Saanila, Pekka J. Soininen, Wei-Min Li, Juhana T. Kostamo, Suvi Haukka, Jyrki Juhanoja, and Wim F.A. Besling. 2002. “Diffusion Barrier Deposition on a Copper Surface by Atomic Layer Deposition” (Abstract). Advanced Materials. vol. 14, No. 13-14, pp. 149-153.Applicant
Peng, C.H., C.H. Hsieh, C.L. Huang, J.C. Lin, M.H. Tsai, M.W. Lin, C.L. Chang, Winston S. Shue, and M.S. Liang. 2002. “A 90nm Generation Copper Dual DAmascene Technology with ALD TaN Barrier.” IEEE. pp. 603-606.Applicant
Van der Straten, O., Y . Zhu, E. Eisenbraun, and A. Kaloyeros. 2002. “Thermal and Electrical Barrier Performance Testing of Ultrathin Atomic Layer Deposition Tantalum-Based Materials for Nanoscale Copper Metallization.” IEEE. pp. 188-190.Applicant
Wu, Z.C., Y.C. Lu, C.C. Chiang, M.C. Chen, B.T. Chen, G.J. Wang, Y.T. Chen, J.L. Huang, S.M. Jang, and M.S. Liang. 2002. “Advanced Metal Barrier Free Cu Damascene Interconnects with PECVD Silicon Carbide Barriers for 90/65-nm BEOL Technology.” IEEE. pp. 595-598.Applicant
Jul. 25, 2003. International Search Report for PCT/US02/24858.Applicant
Mar. 30, 2004. Written Opinion for PCT/US02/19062.Applicant
Apr. 9, 2004. Written Opinion for PCT/US02/19116.Applicant
Apr. 22, 2004. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/998,372, filed Nov. 30, 2001.Applicant
Apr. 28, 2004. Written Opinion for PCT/US02/19117.Applicant
Apr. 29, 2004. Written Opinion for PCT/US02/19061.Applicant
May 5, 2004, International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US01/27406.Applicant
Feb. 1984. “Substrate Screening Process.” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, pp. 4824-4825.Applicant
Miller, G. L., D. A. H. Robinson, and J. D. Wiley. Jul. 1976. “Contactless measurement of semiconductor conductivity by radio frequency-free-carrier power absoption.” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 47, No. 7. pp. 799-805.Applicant
Ostanin, Yu. Ya. Oct. 1981. “Optimization of Thickness Inspection of Electrically Conductive Single-Layer Coatings with Laid-on Eddy-Current Transducers (Abstract).” Defektoskopiya, vol. 17, No. 10, pp. 45-52. Moscow, USSR.Applicant
Feb. 1984. “Method and Apparatus of in Situ Measurement and Overlay Error Analysis for Correcting Step and Repeat Lithographic Cameras.” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, pp. 4855-4859.Applicant
Oct. 1984. “Method to Characterize the Stability of a Step and Repeat Lithographic System.” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, pp. 2857-2860.Applicant
Levine, Martin D. 1985. Vision in Man and Machine. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. pp. ix-xii, 1-58.Applicant
Herrmann, D. 1988. “Temperature Errors and Ways of Elimination for Contactless Measurement of Shaft Vibrations (Abstract).” Technisches Messen™, vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 27-30. West Germany.Applicant
Lin, Kuang-Kuo and Costas J. Spanos. Nov. 1990. “Statistical Equipment Modeling for VLSI Manufacturing: An Application for LPCVD.” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, v. 3, n. 4, pp. 216-229.Applicant
Runyan, W. R., amd K. E. Bean. 1990. “Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Processing Technology.” p. 48. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Applicant
Chang, Norman H. and Costas J. Spanos. Feb. 1991. “Continuous Equipment Diagnosis Using Evidence Integration: An LPCVD Application.” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, v. 4, n. 1, pp. 43-51.Applicant
Larrabee, G. B. May 1991. “The Intelligent Microelectronics Factory of the Future (Abstract).” IEEE/SEMI International Semiconductor Manufacturing Science Symposium, pp. 30-34. Burlingame, CA.Applicant
Burke, Peter A. Jun. 1991. “Semi-Empirical Modelling of SiO2 Chemical-Mechanical Polishing Planarization.” VMIC Conference, 1991 IEEE, pp. 379-384. IEEE.Applicant
Zorich, Robert, 1991, Handbook of Quality Integrated Circuit Manufacturing. pp. 464-498 San Diego, California: Academic Press, Inc.Applicant
Rampalli, Prasad, Arakere Ramesh, and Nimish Shah. 1991. CEPT—A Computer-Aided Manufacturing Application for Managing Equipment Reliability and Availability in the Semiconductor IndustryNew York, New York: IEEE.Applicant
May 1992. “Laser Ablation Endpoint Detector.” IBM Technical DIsclosure Bulletin, pp. 333-334.Applicant
Spanos, Costas J., Hai-Fang Guo, Alan Miller, and Joanne Levine-Parrill. Nov. 1992. “Real-Time Statistical Process Control Using Tool Data.” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, v. 5, n. 4, pp. 308-318.Applicant
Feb. 1993. “Electroless Plating Scheme to Hermetically Seal Copper Features.” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, pp. 405-406.Applicant
Scarr, J. M. and J. K. Zelisse. Apr. 1993. “New Topology for Thickness Monitoring Eddy Current Sensors (Abstract).” Proceedings of the 36th Annual Technical Conference, Dallas Texas.Applicant
Hu, Albert, Kevin Nguyen, Steve Wong, Xiuhua Zhang, Emanuel Sachs, and Peter Renteln. 1993. “Concurrent Deployment of Run by Run Controller Using SCC Framework.” IEEE/SEMI International Semiconductor Manufacturing Science Symposium. pp. 126-132.Applicant
Matsuyama, Akira and Jessi Niou. 1993. “A State-of-the Art Automation System of an ASIC Wafer Fab in Japan.” IEEE/SEMI International Semiconductor Manufacturing Science Syposium, pp. 42-47.Applicant
Yeh, C. Eugene, John C. Cheng, and Kwan Wong. 1993. “Implementation Challenges of a Feedback Control System for Wafer Fabrication.” IEEE/CHMT International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium, pp. 438-442.Applicant
Kurtzberg, Jerome M. and Menachem Levanoni. Jan. 1994. “ABC: A Better Control for Manufacturing.” IBM Journal of Research and Development, v. 38, n. 1, pp. 11-30.Applicant
Mozumder, Purnendu K. and Gabriel G. Barna. Feb. 1994. “Statistical Feedback Control of a Plasma Etch Process.” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, v. 7, n. 1, pp. 1-11.Applicant
Muller-Heinzerling, Thomas, Ulrich Neu, Hans Georg Nurnberg, and Wolfgang May. Mar. 1994. “Recipe-Controlled Operation of Batch Processes with Batch X.” ATP Automatisierungstechnische Praxis, vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 43-51.Applicant
Stoddard, K., P. Crouch, M. Kozicki, and K. Tsakalis. Jun. -Jul. 1994. “Application of Feedforward and Adaptive Feedback Control to Semiconductor Device Manufacturing (Abstract).” Proceeding of the 1994 American Control Conference—ACC'94, vol. 1, pp. 892-896. Baltimore, Maryland.Applicant
Rocha, Joao and Carlos Ramos. Sep. 12, 1994. “Task Planning for Flexible and Agile Manufacturing Systems.” Intelligent Robots and Systems '94. Advanced Robotic Systems and the Real World, IROS '94. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ/GI International Conference on Munich, Germany Sep. 12-16 1994. New York, New York: IEEE., pp. 105-112.Applicant
Schaper, C. D., M. M. Moslehi, K. C. Saraswat, and T. Kailath. Nov. 1994. “Modeling, Identification, and Control of Rapid Thermal Processing Systems (Abstract).” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 141, No. 11, pp. 3200-3209.Applicant
Tao, K. M., R. L. Kosut, M. Ekblad, and G. Aral. Dec. 1994. “Feedforward Learning Applied to RTP of Semiconductor Wafers (Abstract).” Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 1, pp. 67-72. Lake Buena Vista, Florida.Applicant
Hu, Albert, He Du, Steve Wong, Peter Renteln, and Emmanuel Sachs. 1994. “Application of Run by Run Controller to the Chemical-Mechanical Planarization Process.” IEEE/CPMT International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium, pp. 371-378.Applicant
Spanos, C. J., S. Leang, S.-Y. Ma, J. Thomson, B. Bombay, and X. Niu. May 1995. “A Multistep Supervisory Controller for Photolithographic Operations (Abstract).” Proceedings of the Symposium on Process Control, Diagnostics, and Modeling in Semiconductor Manufacturing, pp. 3-17.Applicant
Moyne, James, Roland Telfeyan, Arnon Hurwitz, and John Taylor. Aug. 1995. “A Process-Independent Run-to-Run Controller and Its Application to Chemical-Mechanical Planarization.” SEMI/IEEE Advanced semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan, Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Center for Display Technology & Manufacturiing.Applicant
Zhou, Zhen-Hong and Rafael Reif. Aug. 1995. “Epi-Film Thickness Measurements Using Emission Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy—Part II: Real-Time in Situ Process Monitoring and Control.” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 8, No. 3.Applicant
Telfeyan, Roland, James Moyne, Nauman Chaudhry, James Pugmire, Scott Shellman, Duane Boning, William Moyne, Arnon Hurwitz, and John Taylor. Oct. 1995. “A Multi-Level Approach to the Control of a Chemical-Mechanical Planarization Process.” Minneapolis, Minnesota: 42nd National Symposium of the American Vacuum Society.Applicant
Chang, E., B. Stine, T. Maung, R. Divecha, D. Boning, J. Chung, K. Chang, G. Ray, D. Bradbury, O. S. Nakagawa, S. Oh, and D. Bartelink. Dec. 1995. “Using a Statistical Metrology Framework to Identify Systematic and Random Sources of Die- and Wafer-level ILD Thickness Variation in CMP Processes.” Washington, D.C.: International Electron Devices Meeting.Applicant
Moyne, James R., Nauman Chaudhry, and Roland Telfeyan. 1995. “Adaptive Extensions to a Multi-Branch Run-to-Run Controller for Plasma Etching.” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Display Technology Manufacturing Center.Applicant
Schmid, Hans Albrecht. 1995. “Creating the Architecture of a Manufacturing Framework by Design Patterns.” Austin, Texas:OOPSLA.Applicant
Dishon, G., M. Finarov, R. Kipper, J.W. Curry, T. Schraub, D. Trojan, 4th Stambaugh, Y. Li and J. Ben-Jacob. Feb. 1996. “On-Line Integrated Metrology for CMP Processing.” Santa Clara. California: VMIC Specialty Conferences, 1st International CMP Planarization Conference.Applicant
Leang, Sovarong, Shang-Yi Ma, John Thomson, Bart John Bombay, and Costas J. Spanos. May 1996. “A Control System for Photolithographic Sequences.” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 9, No. 2.Applicant
Smith, Taber, Duane Boning, James Moyne, Arnon Hurwitz, and John Curry. June 1996. “Compensating for CMP Pad Wear Using Run by Run Feedback Control.” Santa Clara, California: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference. pp. 437-739.Applicant
Boning, Duane S., William P. Moyne, Taber H. Smith, James Moyne, Ronald Telfeyan, Arnon Hurwitz, Scott Shellman, and John Taylor. Oct. 1996. “Run by Run Control of Chemical-Mechanical Polishing.” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology—Part C, vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 307-314.Applicant
Zhe, Ning, J. R. Moyne, T. Smith, D. Boning, E. Del Castillo, Yeh Jinn-Yi, and Hurwitz. Nov. 1996. “A Comparative Analysis of Run-to-Run Control Algorithms in Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry (Abstract).” IEEE/SEMI 1996 Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference Workshop, pp. 375-381.Applicant
Yasuda, M., T. Osaka, and M. Ikeda. Dec. 1996. “Feedforward Control of a Vibration Isolation System for Disturbance Suppression (Abstract).” Proceeding of the 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 2, pp. 1229-1233. Kobe, Japan.Applicant
Fan, Jr-Min, Ruey-Shan Guo, Shi-Chung, and Kian-Huei Lee. 1996. “Abnormal Trend Detection of Sequence-Disordered Data Using EWMA Method.” IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, pp. 169-174.Applicant
SEMI. [1986] 1996. “Standard for Definition and Measurement of Equipment Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM).” SEMI E10-96.Applicant
Smith, Taber and Duane Boning. 1996. “A Self-Tuning EWMA Controller Utilizing Artificial Neural Network Function Approximation Techniques.” IEEE/CPMT International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium, pp. 355-363.Applicant
Guo, Ruey-Shan, Li-Shia Huang, Argon Chen, and Jin-Jung Chen. Oct. 1997. “A Cost-Effective Methodology for a Run-by-Run EWMA Controller.” 6th International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing, pp. 61-64.Applicant
Mullins, J. A., W. J. Campbell, and A. D. Stock. Oct. 1997. “An Evaluation of Model Predictive Control in Run-to-Run Processing in Semiconductor Manufacturing (Abstract).” Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering Conference, vol. 3213, pp. 182-189.Applicant
Reitman, E. A., D. J. Friedman, and E. R. Lory. Nov. 1997. “Pre-Production Results Demonstrating Multiple-System Models for Yield Analysis (Abstract).” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 469-481.Applicant
Durham, Jim and Myriam Roussel. 1997. “A Statistical Method for Correlating In-Line Defectivity to Probe Yield.” IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, pp. 76-77.Applicant
Shindo, Wataru, Eric H. Wang, Ram Akella, and Andrzej J. Strojwas. 1997. “Excursion Detection and Source Isolation in Defect Inspection and Classification.” 2nd International Workshop on Statistical Metrology, pp. 90-93.Applicant
Van Zant, Peter. 1997. Microchip Fabrication: A Practical Guide to Semiconductor Processing. Third Edition, pp. 472-478. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.Applicant
Campbell, W. Jarrett, and Anthony J. Toprac. Feb. 11-12, 1998. “Run-to-Run Control in Microelectronics Manufacturing.” Advanced Micro Devises, TWMCC.Applicant
Edgar, Thomas F., Stephanie W. Butler, Jarrett Campbell, Carlos Pfeiffer, Chris Bode, Sung Bo Hwang, and K.S. Balakrishnan. May 1998. “Automatic Control in Microelectronics Manufacturing: Practices, Challenges, and Possibilities.” Automatica, vol. 36, pp. 1567-1603, 2000.Applicant
Moyne, James, and John Curry. Jun. 1998. “A Fully Automated Chemical-Mechanical Planarization Process.” Santa Clara, California: VLSI Multilevel Interconnection (V-MIC) Conference.Applicant
Jul. 1998. “Active Controller: Utilizing Active Databases for Implementing Multistep Control of Semiconductor Manufacturing (Abstract).” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology—Part C, vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 217-224.Applicant
SEMI. Jul. 1998. New Standard: Provisional Specification for CIM Framework Domain Architecture. Mountain View, California: SEMI Standards. SEMI Draft Doc. 2817.Applicant
Consilium. Aug. 1998. Quality Management Component: QMC™ and QMC-Link™ Overview. Mountain View, California: Consilium, Inc.Applicant
Chemali, Chadi El, James Moyne, Kareemullah Khan, Rock Nadeau, Paul Smith, John Colt, Jonathan Chapple-Sokol, and Tarun Parikh. Nov. 1998. “Multizone Uniformity Control of a CMP Process Utilizing a Pre and Post-Measurement Strategy.” Seattle, Washington: SEMETECH Symposium.Applicant
Consilium. 1998. FAB300™. Mountain View, California: Consilium, Inc.Applicant
Fang, S. J., A. Barda, T. Janecko, W. Little, D. Outley, G. Hempel, S. Joshi, B. Morrison, G. B. Shinn, and M. Birang. 1998. “Control of Dielectric Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Using and Interferometry Based Endpoint Sensor.” International Proceedings of the IEEE interconnect Technology Conference, pp. 76-78.Applicant
Khan, Kareemullah, Victor Solakhain, Anthony Ricci, Tier Gu, and James Moyne. 1998. “Run-to-Run Control of ITO Deposition Process.” Ann Arbor, Michigan.Applicant
Ouma, Dennis, Duane Boning, James Chung, Greg Shinn, Leif Olsen, and John Clark. 1998. “An Integrated Characterization and Modeling Methodology for CMP Dielectric Planarization.” Proceedings of the IEEE 1998 International Interconnect Technology Conference, pp. 67-69.Applicant
Suzuki, Junichi and Yoshikazu Yamamoto. 1998. “Toward the Interoperable Software Design Models: Quartet of UML, XML, DOM and Corba.” Proceedings IEEE International Software Engineering Standards Symposium. pp. 1-10.Applicant
Consilium. Jan. 1999. “FAB300™: Consilium's Next Generation MES Solution of Software and Services which Control and Automate Real-Time FAB Operations.” www.consilium.com/products/fab300—page.htm#FAB300 Introduction.Applicant
Boning, Duane S., Jerry Stefani, and Stephanie W. Butler. Feb. 1999. “Statistical Methods for Semiconductor Manufacturing.” Encyclopedia of Electrical Engineering, J. G. Webster, Ed.Applicant
McIntosh, John. Mar. 1999. “Using CD-SEM Metrology in the Manufacture of Semiconductors (Abstract).” JOM, vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 38-39.Applicant
Pan, J. Tony, Ping Li, Kapila Wijekoon, Stan Tsai, and Fritz Redeker. May 1999. “Copper CMP Integration and Time Dependent Pattern Effect.” IEEE 1999 International Interconnect Technology Conference, pp. 164-166.Applicant
Klein, Bruce. Jun. 1999. “Application Development: XML Makes Object Models More Useful.” Informationweek. pp. 1A-6A.Applicant
Baliga, John. Jul. 1999. “Advanced Process Control: Soon to be a Must.” Cahners Semiconductor International. www.semiconductor.net/semiconductor/issues/issues/1999/jul99/docs/feature1.asp.Applicant
Consilium. Jul. 1999. “Increasing Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) in Fab Manufacturing by Implementing Consilium's Next-Generation Manufacturing Execution System—MES II.” Semiconductor Fabtech Edition 10.Applicant
Mackl, P. H. and K. Umemoto. Aug. 1999. “Achieving Fast Motions in Semiconductor Manufacturing Machinery (Abstract).” Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, vol. 1, pp. 725-729. Kohala Coast, HI.Applicant
Consilium Corporate Brochure. Oct. 1999. www.consilium.com.Applicant
Khan, K., C. El Chemali, J. Moyne, J. Chapple-Sokol, R. Nadeau, P. Smith, C., and T. Parikh. Oct. 1999. “Yield Improvement at the Contact Process Through Run-to-Run Control (Abstract).” 24 th IEEE/CPMT Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium, pp. 258-263.Applicant
Moyne, James. Oct. 1999. “Advancements in CMP Process Automation and Control.” Hawaii: (Invited paper and presentation to) Third International Symposium on Chemical Mechanical Polishing in IC Device Manufacturing: 196th Meeting of the Electrochemical Society.Applicant
Williams, Randy, Dadi Gudmundsson, Kevin Monahan, Raman Nurani, Meryl Stoller and J. George Shanthikumar. Oct. 1999. “Optimized Sample Planning for Wafer Defect Inspection,” Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference Proceedings, 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Santa Clara, CA. Piscataway, NJ. pp. 43-46.Applicant
Consilium. Nov. 1999. FAB300™ Update.Applicant
Ruegsegger, Steven, Aaron Wagner, James S. Freudenberg, and Dennis S. Grimard. Nov. 1999. “Feedforward Control for Reduced Run-to-Run Variation in Micoelectronics Manufacturing.” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 12, No. 4.Applicant
1999. “Contactless Bulk Resistivity/Sheet Resistance Measurement and Mapping Systems.” www.Lehighton.com/fabtech1/index.html.Applicant
Nov. 1999. “How to Use EWMA to Achieve SPC and EPC Control.” International Symposium on NDT Contribution to the Infrastructure Safety Systems, Tores, Brazil. <http://www.ndt.net/abstract/ndtiss99/data/35.htm>.Applicant
Edgar, T. F., W. J. Campbell, and C. Bode. Dec. 1999. “Model-Based Control in Microelectronics Manufacturing.” Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Phoenix, Arizona, vol. 4, pp. 4185-4191.Applicant
Meckl, P. H. and K. Umemoto. Apr. 2000. “Achieving Fast Motions by Using Shaped Reference Inputs <Semiconductor Manufacturing Machine> (Abstract).” NEC Research and Development, vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 232-237.Applicant
Chemali, Chadi El, James Moyne, Kareemullah Khan, Rock Nadeau, Paul Smith, John Colt, Jonathan Chapple-Sokol, and Tarun Parikh. Jul./Aug. 2000, “Multizone Uniformity Control of a Chemical Mechanical Polishing Process Utilizing a Pre- and Postmeasurement Strategy.” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, vol. 18(4). pp. 1287-1296. American Vacuum Society.Applicant
Oechsner, R., T. Tschaftary, S. Sommer, L. Pfitzner, H. Ryssel, H. Gerath, C. Baier, and Hafner. Sep. 2000. “Feed-forward Control for a Lithography/Etch Sequence (Abstract).” Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering Conference, vol. 4182, pp. 31-39.Applicant
Cheung, Robin. Oct. 18, 2000. “Copper Interconnect Technology.” AVS/CMP User Group Meeting, Santa Clara, CA.Applicant
Edgar, Thomas F., Stephanie W. Butler, W. Jarrett Campbell, Carlos Pfeiffer, Christopher Bode, Sung Bo Hwang, K. S. Balakrishnan, and J. Hahn. Nov. 2000. “Automatic Control in Microelectronics Manufacturing: Practices, Challenges, and Possibilities (Abstract).” Automatica, v. 36, No. 11.Applicant
Khan, S., M. Musavi, and H. Ressom. Nov. 2000. “Critical Dimension Control in Semiconductor Manufacturing (Abstract).” ANNIE 2000. Smart Engineering Systems Design Conference, pp. 995-1000. St. Louis, Missouri.Applicant
ACM Research Inc. 2000. “Advanced Copper Metallization for 0.13 to 0.05 μm & Beyond.” <http://acmrc.com/press/ACM-ECP-brochure.pdf>.Applicant
Ravid, Avi, Avner Sharon, Amit Weingarten, Vladimir Machavariani, and David Scheiner. 2000. “Copper CMP Planarity Control Using ITM.” IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, pp. 437-443.Applicant
SEMI. 2000. “Provisional Specifications for CIM Framework Scheduling Component.” San Jose, Califorina. SEMI E105-1000.Applicant
2000. “Microsense II Capacitance Gaging System.” www.adetech.com.Applicant
Chen, Argon and Ruey-Shan Guo. Feb. 2001. “Age-Based Double EWMA Controller and Its Application to CMP Processes.” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 11-19.Applicant
Mar. 5, 2001, “KLA-Tencor Introduces First Production-worthy Copper CMP In-situ Film Thickness and End-point Control System.” http://www.kla-tencor.com/j/servlet/NewsItem?newsItemID=74.Applicant
Lee, Brian, Duane S. Boning, Winthrop Baylies, Noel Poduje, Pat Hester, Yong Xia, John Valley, Chris Koliopoulus, Dale Hetherington, HongJiang Sun, and Michael Lacy. Apr. 2001. “Wafer Nanotopgraphy Effects on CMP: Experimental Validation of Modeling Methods.” San Francisco. California: Materials Research Society Spring Meeting.Applicant
Tobin, K. W., T. P. Karnowski, L. F. Arrowood, and F. Lakhani. Apr. 2001. “Field Test Results of an Automated Image Retrieval System (Abstract).” Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, 2001 IEEE/SEMI, Munich, Germany.Applicant
Tan, K. K., H. F. Dou, and K. Z. Tang. May-Jun. 2001. “Precision Motion Control System for Ultra-Precision Semiconductor and Electronic Components Manufacturing (Abstract).” 51st Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2001. Proceedings , pp. 1372-1379, Orlando, Florida.Applicant
Jensen, Alan, Peter Renteln, Stephen Jew, Chris Raeder, and Patrick Cheung. Jun. 2001. “Empirical-Based Modeling for Control of CMP Removal Uniformity.” Solid State Technology, vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 101-102, 104, 106. Cowan Publ. Corp.: Washington, D.C.Applicant
Jul. 5, 2001. “Motorola and Advanced Micro Devices Buy ObjectSpace Catalyst Advanced Process Control Product for Five Wafer Fabs.” Semiconductor FABTECH. www.semiconductorfabtech.com/industry.news/9907/20.07.shtml.Applicant
Heuberger, U. Sep. 2001. “Coating Thickness Measurement with Dual-Function Eddy-Current & Magnetic Inductance Instrument (Abstract).” Galvanotechnik, vol. 92, No. 9, pp. 2354-2366+IV.Applicant
Pilu, Maurizio. Sep. 2001. “Undoing Page Curl Distortion Using Applicable Surfaces.” IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Thessalonica, Greece.Applicant
Oct. 15, 2001, Search Report prepared by the Austrian Patent Office for Singapore Patent Application No. 200004286-1.Applicant
Wang, LiRen and Hefin Rowlands. 2001. “A Novel NN-Fuzzy-SPC Feedback Control System.” 8th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, pp. 417-423.Applicant
NovaScan 2020. Feb. 2002. “Superior Integrated Process Control for Emerging CMP High-End Applications.”Applicant
Mar. 15, 2002. Office Action for U.S. Appl No. 09/469,227, filed Dec. 22, 1999.Applicant
Mar. 29, 2002. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/363,966, filed Jul. 29, 1999.Applicant
Moyne, J., V. Solakhian, A. Yershov, M. Anderson, and D. Mockler-Hebert. Apr.-May 2002. “Development and Deployment of a Multi-Component Advanced Process Control System for an Epitaxy Tool (Abstract).” 2002 IEEE Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop, pp. 125-130.Applicant
Sarfaty, Moshe, Arulkumar Shanmugasundram, Alexander Schwarm, Joseph Paik, Jimin Zhang, Rong Pan, Martin J. Seamons, Howard Li, Raymond Hung, and Suketu Parikh. Apr.-May 2002. “Advance Process Control Solutions for Semiconductor Manufacturing.” Boston, Massachusetts: 13th Annual IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference. Advancing the Science and Technology of Semiconductor Manufacturing. ASMC 2002, pp. 101-106.Applicant
Campbell, W. J., S. K. Firth, A. J. Toprac, and T. F. Edgar. May 2002. “A Comparison of Run-to-Run Control Algorithm (Abstract).” Proceedings of 2002 American Control Conference, vol. 3, pp. 2150-2155.Applicant
Good, Richard and S. Joe Qin. May 2002. “Stability Analysis of Double EWMA Run-to-Run Control with Metrology Delay.” IEEE/CPMT International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium, pp. 355-363.Applicant
Smith, Stewart, Anthony J. Walton, Alan W. S. Ross, Georg K. H. Bodammer, and J. T. M. Stevenson. May 2002. “Evaluation of Sheet Resistance and Electrical Linewidth Measurement Techniques for Copper Damascene Interconnect.” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 214-222.Applicant
Johnson, Bob. Jun. 10, 2002. “Advanced Process Control Key to Moore's Law.” Gartner, Inc.Applicant
Jun. 20, 2002. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,044, filed Jul. 19, 2000.Applicant
Itabashi, Takeyuki, Hiroshi Nakano, and Haruo Akahoshi. Jun. 2002. “Electroless Deposited CoWB for Copper Diffusion Barrier Metal.” IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference, pp. 285-287.Applicant
Jul. 9, 2002. International Search Report for PCT/US01/24910.Applicant
Jul. 23, 2002. Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC for European Patent Application No. 00 115 577.9.Applicant
Jul. 29, 2002. International Search Report for PCT/US01/27407.Applicant
Sep. 26, 2002. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/637,620, filed Aug. 11, 2000.Applicant
Oct. 4, 2002, International Search Report for PCT/US01/22833.Applicant
Oct. 15, 2002. International Search Report for PCT/US02/19062.Applicant
Oct. 23, 2002. International Search Report for PCT/US01/27406.Applicant
Nov. 7, 2002. International Search Report for PCT/US02/19061.Applicant
Nov. 11, 2002. International Search Report for PCT/US02/19117.Applicant
Nov. 12, 2002. International Search Report for PCT/US02/19063.Applicant
ACM Research, Inc. 2002. “ACM Ultra ECP® System: Electro-Copper Plating (ECP) Deposition.” www.acmrc.com/ecp.html.Applicant
Applied Materials, Inc. 2002. “Applied Materials: Information for Everyone: Copper Electrochemical Plating.” www.appliedmaterials.com/products/copper—electrochemical—plating.html.Applicant
KLA-Tencor Corporation. 2002. “KLA Tencor: Press Release: KLA-Tencor Introduces First Production-Worthy Copper CMP In-Situ Film Thickness and End-point Control System: Multi-Million Dollar Order Shipped to Major CMP Tool Manufacturer.” www.kla-tencor.com/news—events/press—releases/press—releases2001/984086002.html.Applicant
Takahashi, Shingo, Kaori Tai, Hiizu Ohtorii, Naoki Komai, Segawa, Hiroshi Horikoshi, Zenya Yasuda, Hiroshi Yamada, Masao Ishihara, and Takeshi Nogami. 2002. “Fragile Porous Low-k/Copper Integration by Using Electro-Chemical Polishing.” 2002 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 32-33.Applicant
2002. “Microsense II—5810: Non-Contact Capacitance Gaging Module.” www.adetech.com.Applicant
Mar. 25, 2003. International Search Report for PCT/US02/24859.Applicant
May 23, 2003. Written Opinion for PCT/US01/24910.Applicant
Jul. 23, 2003. Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search PCT/US02/19116.Applicant
Aug. 1, 2003. Written Opinion for PCT/US01/27406.Applicant
Aug. 8, 2003. PCT International Search Report from PCT/US03/08513.Applicant
Aug. 20, 2003. Written Opinion for PCT/US01/22833.Applicant
Oct. 14, 2003. PCT International Search Report from PCT/US02/21942.Applicant
Oct. 20, 2003. PCT International Search Report from PCT/US02/19116.Applicant
Oct. 23, 2003. PCT International Preliminary Examination Report from PCT/US01/24910.Applicant
“NanoMapper wafer nanotopography measurement by ADE Phase Shift.” Printed Dec. 9, 2003. http://www.phase-shift.com/nanomap.shtml.Applicant
“Wafer flatness measurement of advanced wafers.” Printed Dec. 9, 2003. http://www.phase-shift.com/wafer-flatness.shtml.Applicant
“ADE Technologies, Inc.—6360.” Printed Dec. 9, 2003. http://www.adetech.com/6360.shtml.Applicant
“optical profilometer MicroXAM by ADE Phase Shift.” Printed Dec. 9, 2003. http://www.phase-shift.com/microxam.shtml.Applicant
“NanoMapper FA factory automation wafer nanotopography measurement.” Printed Dec. 9, 2003. http://www.phase-shift.com/nanomapperfa.shtml.Applicant
Dec. 11, 2003. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/943,383, filed Aug. 31, 2001.Applicant
Dec. 16, 2003. International Search Report PCT/US03/23964.Applicant
Cunningham, James A. 2003. “Using Electrochemistry to Improve Copper Interconnects.” <http://www.e-insite.net/semiconductor/index.asp?layout=article&articleid=CA47465>.Applicant
Jan. 20, 2004. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/927,444, filed Aug. 13, 2001.Applicant
Jan. 23, 2004. International Search Report for PCT/US02/24860.Applicant
Feb. 2, 2004. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/363,966, filed Jul. 29, 1999.Applicant
Adams, Bret W., Bogdan Swedek, Rajeev Bajaj, Fritz Redeker, Manush Birang, and Gregory Amico. “Full-Wafer Endpoint Detection Improves Process Control in Copper CMP.” Semiconductor Fabtech—12th Edition. Applied Materials, Inc., Santa Clara, CA.Applicant
Berman, Mike, Thomas Bibby, and Alan Smith. “Review of In Situ & In-line Detection for CMP Applications.” Semiconductor Fabtech, 8th Edition, pp. 267-274.Applicant
Dishon, G., D. Eylon, M. Finarov, and A.Shulman. “Dielectric CMP Advanced Process Control Based on Integrated Monitoring.” Ltd. Rehoveth, Israel: Nova Measuring Instruments.Applicant
“Semiconductor Manufacturing: An Overview.” <http://users.ece.gatech.edu/˜gmay/overview.html>.Applicant
Sep. 15, 2004. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/632,107, filed Aug. 1, 2003.Applicant
Sep. 29, 2004. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/363,966, filed Jul. 29, 1999.Applicant
Oct. 1, 2004, International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT Serial No. PCT/US03/23964.Applicant
Oct. 6, 2004. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,108, filed Jan. 20, 2004.Applicant
Oct. 12, 2004, International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT Serial No. PCT/US02/19061.Applicant
Nov. 17, 2004. Written Opinion for PCT Serial No. PCT/US01/27407.Applicant
Nov. 19, 2004. International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US03/36501.Applicant

Abstract

Description

Related Application

[0001] This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/426,393, filed Nov. 15, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Field of the Invention

Background of the Invention

Summary of the Invention

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0011] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a conventional offset model;

[0012] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating processing equipment;

[0013] FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a model of the processing equipment shown in FIG. 2 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention;

[0014] FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating various components of embodiments of the present invention;

[0015] FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating processing steps of embodiments of the present invention;

[0016] FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a CMP process;

[0017] FIG. 7 is a block diagram representation of an example embodiment of a computer configured to perform embodiments of the present invention; and

[0018] FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of a memory medium that can be used for storing computer programs of embodiments of the present invention.

Detailed Description

[0024] 1) X′₁=PX₁; X′₂=PX₂(In this example, the value of {right arrow over (P)} is identical for both X1 and X2.)
[0025] 2) X′₁=P₁₁X₁+P₁₂X₁²; X′₂=P₂₁X₁+P₂₂X₂²+P_crossX₁X₂(In this example, P₁₁, P₁₂, P₂₁, P₂₂and P_crosscan have different values.)

Here, the score function, S_p, is:

[0028]

S_{p} = \sum_{i, k} {W_{i, k} (y_{actual}^{i k} - y_{predicted}^{i k} ({\vec{X}}^{i^{'}} ({\vec{X}}^{i}, \vec{P})))}^{2}

where:

[0029] i—number of wafer;
[0030] k—number of output;
[0031] y_actual—an actual output value;
[0032] y_predicted—a predicted output value, as calculated based on transformed inputs for a particular wafer i ({right arrow over (X)}^i′);
[0033] {right arrow over (X)}^i′=(X₁^i′,X₂^i′,X₃^i′) is the transformed input vector, calculated on the base of the actual input; and {right arrow over (X)}ⁱ=(X₁ⁱ,X₂ⁱ,X₃ⁱ) for wafer i together with the transformation parameters {right arrow over (P)}. This calculation is performed using the following transformation functions:
ψ₁(X₁,X₂,X₃,{right arrow over (P)}): ψ₂(X₁,X₂,X₃,{right arrow over (P)}); and ψ₃(X₁,X₂,X₃,{right arrow over (P)}).
The next step, as noted above, is to minimize the score S_p, i.e., to find {right arrow over (P)} values that provide the minimum of

[0034]

S_{p} (S_{p} \underset{p}{⟶} \min)

[0041] As a new set of data points arrives, a new optimum {right arrow over (P)} can be recalculated.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A computer implemented method for controlling a manufacturing apparatus, the method comprising:

(a) identifying at least one input, the at least one input causing a change in at least two of a plurality of outputs;

S_{p} = \sum_{i, k} {W_{i, k} (y_{actual}^{i k} - y_{predicted}^{i k} ({\vec{X}}^{i^{'}} ({\vec{X}}^{i}, \vec{P})))}^{2}

where:

i—number of wafer;

k—number of output;

y_actual—an empirical output value;

y_predicted—a predicted output value, as calculated based on transformed inputs for a particular wafer i ({right arrow over (X)}^i′)

(d) calculating one or more input values for one or more desired output values based on, in part, the calculated set of transform coefficients; and

(e) communicating the transformed input values of (d) to a manufacturing apparatus.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising;

collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values;

calculating a new set of coefficients {right arrow over (P)}_new; and

using the new set of coefficients as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising;

collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values;

calculating a new set of coefficients as

{right arrow over (P)}_new≡{right arrow over (P)}_previous+K({right arrow over (P)}_optimum−{right arrow over (P)}_previous),

wherein K<1 and {right arrow over (P)}_previousis a previously calculated optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}; and

using the new set of coefficients as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

4. A computer implemented system for controlling a manufacturing apparatus, the system comprising:

(a) means for identifying at least one input, the at least one input causing a change in at least two of a plurality of outputs;

S_{p} = \sum_{i, k} {W_{i, k} (y_{actual}^{i k} - y_{predicted}^{i k} ({\vec{X}}^{i^{'}} ({\vec{X}}^{i}, \vec{P})))}^{2}

where:

i—number of wafer;

k—number of output;

y_actual—an empirical output value;

y_predicted—a predicted output value, as calculated based on transformed inputs for a particular wafer i ({right arrow over (X)}^i′)

(d) means for calculating one or more input values for one or more desired output values based on, in part, the calculated set of transform coefficients; and

(e) means for communicating the transformed input values of (d) to a manufacturing apparatus.

5. The system of claim 4, further comprising:

means for collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values; and

means for calculating a new set of coefficients {right arrow over (P)}_new, wherein the new set of coefficients is defined as the optimal value of {right arrow over (P)}.

6. The system of claim 4, further comprising:

means for collecting additional empirical data and corresponding input values; and

means for calculating a new set of coefficients as

{right arrow over (P)}_new≡{right arrow over (P)}_previous+K({right arrow over (P)}_optimum−{right arrow over (P)}_previous),

(a) identifying at least one input, the at least one input causing a change in at least two of a plurality of outputs;

S_{p} = \sum_{i, k} {W_{i, k} (y_{actual}^{i k} - y_{predicted}^{i k} ({\vec{X}}^{i^{'}} ({\vec{X}}^{i}, \vec{P})))}^{2}