US 9,513,480 B2Grant
Waveguide
Issue Date:2016-12-06
•20 Claims
•26 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A waveguide has a front and a rear surface, the waveguide for a display system and arranged to guide light from a light engine onto an eye of a user to make an image visible to the user, the light guided through the waveguide by reflection at the front and rear surfaces. A first portion of the front or rear surface has a structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the first portion by a first amount. A second portion of the same surface has a different structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the second portion by a second amount different from the first amount. The first portion is offset from the second portion by a distance which substantially matches the difference between the second amount and the first amount.
Metadata
Assignee
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
Inventors
- Pasi Saarikko
- Pasi Kostamo
Application Information
Application Number:US 14/617,697
Filing Date:2015-02-09
Priority Date:2015-02-09
Art Unit:2883
Classifications
IPC:
G02B6/26G02B27/01F21V8/00G02B5/18
Field of Search:
G02B 27/0172G02B 5/1842G02B 6/0035G02B 6/0031G02B 6/0055G02B 26/0816G02B 5/0252G02B 5/18G02B 5/1857G02B 5/1871G02B 6/0018
Patent Drawings (26 sheets)
Description
Background
[0001] Display systems can used to make a desired image visible to a user (viewer). Wearable display systems can be embodied in a wearable headset which is arranged to display an image within a short distance from a human eye. Such wearable headsets are sometimes referred to as head mounted displays, and are provided with a frame which has a central portion fitting over a user's (wearer's) nose bridge and left and right support extensions which fit over a user's ears. Optical components are arranged in the frame so as to display an image within a few centimeters of the user's eyes. The image can be a computer generated image on a display, such as a micro display. The optical components are arranged to transport light of the desired image which is generated on the display to the user's eye to make the image visible to the user. The display on which the image is generated can form part of a light engine, such that the image itself generates collimated lights beams which can be guided by the optical component to provide an image visible to the user.
[0002] Different kinds of optical components have been used to convey the image from the display to the human eye. These can include lenses, mirrors, optical waveguides, holograms and diffraction gratings, for example. In some display systems, the optical components are fabricated using optics that allows the user to see the image but not to see through this optics at the “real world”. Other types of display systems provide view through this optics so that the generated image which is displayed to the user is overlaid onto a real world view. This is sometimes referred to as augmented reality.
[0003] Waveguide-based display systems typically transport light from a light engine to the eye via a TIR (Total Internal Reflection) mechanism in a waveguide (light guide). Such systems can incorporate diffraction gratings, which cause effective beam expansion so as to output expanded versions of the beams provided by the light engine. This means the image is visible over a wider area when looking at the waveguide's output than when looking at the light engine directly: provided the eye is within an area such that it can receive some light from substantially all of the expanded beams, the whole image will be visible to the user. Such an area is referred to as an eye box.
[0004] To maintain image quality, the structure of the waveguide can be configured in various ways to mitigate distortion of the transported light.
Summary
[0005] This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Nor is the claimed subject matter limited to implementations that solve any or all of the disadvantages noted in the background section.
[0006] According to a first aspect a waveguide has a front and a rear surface. The waveguide is for a display system and is arranged to guide light from a light engine onto an eye of a user to make an image visible to the user. The light is guided through the waveguide by reflection at the front and rear surfaces. A first portion of the front or rear surface has a structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the first portion by a first amount. A second portion of the same surface has a different structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the second portion by a second amount different from the first amount. The first portion is offset from the second portion by a distance which substantially matches the difference between the second amount and the first amount.
[0007] According to a second aspect an image display system comprises a light engine configured to generate an image and a waveguide having a front and a rear surface. The waveguide is arranged to guide light from the light engine onto an eye of a user to make the image visible to the user, the light guided through the waveguide by reflection at the front and rear surfaces. A first portion of the front or rear surface has a structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the first portion by a first amount. A second portion of the same surface has a different structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the second portion by a second amount different from the first amount. The first portion is offset from the second portion by a distance which substantially matches the difference between the second amount and the first amount.
[0008] According to a third aspect a wearable image display system comprising: a headpiece; a light engine mounted on the headpiece and configured to generate an image; and a waveguide located forward of an eye of a wearer in use. The waveguide has a front and a rear surface, and is arranged to guide light from the display onto the eye of the wearer to make the image visible to the wearer, the light guided through the waveguide by reflection at the front and rear surfaces. A first portion of the front or rear surface has a structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the first portion by a first amount. A second portion of the same surface has a different structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the second portion by a second amount different from the first amount. The first portion is offset from the second portion by a distance which substantially matches the difference between the second amount and the first amount.
Brief Description of Figures
[0009] FIG. 1 shows a wearable display system;
[0010] FIG. 2A shows a plan view of part of the display system;
[0011] FIGS. 3A and 3B shows perspective and frontal view of an optical component;
[0012] FIG. 4A shows a schematic plan view of an optical component having a surface relief grating formed on its surface;
[0013] FIG. 4B shows a schematic illustration of the optical component of FIG. 4A , shown interacting with incident light and viewed from the side;
[0014] FIG. 5A shows a schematic illustration of a straight binary surface relief grating, shown interacting with incident light and viewed from the side;
[0015] FIG. 5B shows a schematic illustration of a slanted binary surface relief grating, shown interacting with incident light and viewed from the side;
[0016] FIG. 5C shows a schematic illustration of an overhanging triangular surface relief grating, shown interacting with incident light and viewed from the side;
[0017] FIG. 6 shows a close up view of part of an incoupling zone of an optical component;
[0018] FIG. 7A shows a perspective view of a part of a display system;
[0019] FIG. 7B shows a plan view of individual pixels of a display;
[0020] FIGS. 7C and 7D show plan and frontal views of a beam interacting with an optical component;
[0021] FIG. 7E shows a frontal view of an optical component performing beam expansion;
[0022] FIG. 7F shows a plan view of an optical component performing beam expansion;
[0023] FIG. 7G is a plan view of a curved optical component;
[0024] FIGS. 8A and 8B are plan and frontal views of a part of an optical component;
[0025] FIG. 9A shows a perspective view of beam reflection within a fold zone of a waveguide;
[0026] FIG. 9B illustrates a beam expansion mechanism;
[0027] FIGS. 10A and 10B show plan and side views of a part of a waveguide having optical elements which are not offset from one another, and FIG. 10C shows a phase distribution for the waveguide of FIGS. 10A and 10B ;
[0028] FIG. 11A shows a side view of a part of a waveguide having optical elements which are not offset from one another and which exhibit apodization, and FIG. 11B shows a phase distribution for the waveguide of FIG. 11A .
[0029] FIG. 12A shows a side view of a part of a first optical component having offset optical elements, and FIG. 12B shows a phase distribution for the second waveguide of FIG. 12A ;
[0030] FIGS. 13A and 13B show plan and side views of a part of a second waveguide having offset optical elements, and FIG. 13C shows a phase distribution for the second waveguide of FIGS. 13A and 13B ;
[0031] FIG. 14 shows graphs of simulated performance data for the waveguide of FIGS. 11A and 11B ;
[0032] FIG. 15 shows graphs of simulated performance data for the first waveguide of FIG. 12A ;
[0033] FIG. 16 shows a flow chart for a microfabrication process for manufacturing optical components or masters;
[0034] FIG. 17A shows an exemplary optical component having certain characteristics which may impact on image quality;
[0035] FIG. 17B shows an exposure set-up which could be used in making the optical component of FIG. 17A ;
[0036] FIG. 18 shows a graph of MTF as function of gap width for an exemplary waveguide.
Detailed Description
[0037] Typically, a waveguide based display system comprises an image source, e.g. a projector, waveguide(s) and various optical elements (e.g. diffraction gratings) imprinted on the waveguide surfaces.
[0038] FIGS. 10A and 10B show side and plan views of part of an optical waveguide 10a having diffractive optical elements O1, O2 (which are diffraction gratings) imprinted on the top of the waveguide's surface. The first grating O1 has a depth h1 and the second grating O2 has a depth h2. An expanded side view of the optical elements O1, O2 is shown at the top of FIG. 10A . Each optical element is formed of a series of grooves in the surface of the waveguide 10a of depth h1, h2≠h1 respectively as measured normal to the waveguide. The depths h1, h2 are constant across the whole of the gratings O1, O2 in this example.
[0039] The first and second elements O1, O2 are used, for example, to couple light emitted by the image source into and out of the waveguide, and/or for manipulation of its spatial distribution within the waveguide. While being necessary for the operation of the display system, the optical elements O1, O2 can also cause unwanted distortions on the phase front of the light field as it travels through the waveguide. In particular, phase distortions may be created when the wavefront meets the edges of the optical elements O1, O2. Elements may also change the amplitude of the field differently, i.e. there will be amplitude variation as well. However, in terms of image quality the phase distortion is much more severe and matching of amplitude of the field portions is not required to achieve acceptable image quality.
[0040] The optical elements O1 and O2 are separated by a blank surface region B, which is substantially non-diffractive (i.e. which interacts with light substantially in accordance with Snell's law and the law of reflection). Portions of the wavefront that are totally internally reflected from the blank surface region B of the light guide experience a different phase retardation than portions that are reflected from the optical elements O1, O2. A ray R0 change phase upon total internal reflection from the (or any other) blank surface region B by an amount φ0 which depends on the polarization of the incident light. A ray R1 change phase upon reflection from the first optical element O1 by an amount φ1=φ0−Δφ1. A ray R2 change phase upon reflection from the second optical component O2 by an amount φ2=φ0−φ2. This is illustrated in the phase distribution of FIG. 10C , which shows the phase of the rays R1, R0, R2 after reflection from the first optical element O1, the blank surface B, and the second optical element O2 respectively.
[0041] Generally, gratings and TIR change the phase of polarization components differently, i.e. there is polarization rotation as well. As will be apparent, the description of the preceding paragraph is a simplification to aid illustration of the distortion mechanism.
[0042] Note the term “reflected” as it is used herein includes reflectively diffracted light e.g. as created by a reflective or partially reflective diffraction grating. Both zero and higher order modes can experience phase retardation. In general, polarization of reflected higher order modes as well as 0th order mode can be rotated or turned into/out of elliptical polarization etc.
[0043] Such phase jumps result in diffractive beam spreading and thus loss of image sharpness. One method to reduce the effect of edge diffraction would be to use apodization. Generally this means using some form of smoothing to turn sharp edges into more continuously varying shapes. The smoothing can be done through various means. In the case of gratings the depth of the grating structure, or more generally any other profile parameter, could be varied smoothly between two regions. An exemplary waveguide 10b exhibiting apodization is shown in FIG. 11A . The waveguide 10b has first and second optical elements O1′, O2′ which are equivalent to the optical component O1, O2 of the waveguide 10a but for the fact that the depth of O1′, O2′ gradually decreases to zero throughout first and second apodization regions A1, A2 respectively, which are adjacent a blank region B that separates the optical elements O1′ and O2′. This results in gradually varying phase in the apodized area, as shown in the phase distribution of FIG. 11B . As can be seen in FIG. 11B, the amount by which the phase of rays changes due to reflection in the apodization regions A1, A2 varies as a function of location across the apodization regions A1, A2, with rays reflected closer to the blank region B exhibiting phase changes which are close to that exhibited by rays reflected in the blank region B itself. Whilst this can in some cases lead to reduced strength edge diffraction and diffractive beam spreading, apodization can have other undesired effects e.g. it can reduce the efficiency of the grating near its edges.
[0044] The present disclosure provides a means to reduce phase distortions caused by diffractive optical elements imprinted on the surface of the light guide. In particular, the effect of the grating edge on the wavefront is removed by adding a suitable height offset to a grating and/or to the blank surface (or other grating) next to it. The offset is selected so that the total phase retardance for rays that are reflected from the offset grating is equal to the phase retardance of rays that are totally internally reflected from the blank surface of the waveguide (or that are reflected from the other grating).
[0045] As compared with the method of using apodization, the method of the present disclosure allows for improved reduction of phase distortions as compared with apodization. This is achieved while maintaining other desired properties of the gratings, e.g. gratings can be optimized for efficiency over the entire surface area of the gratings, including at the edges of the grating, by for instance maintaining a desired depth profile right up to the edges of the grating.
[0046] This is described in detail below. First, a context in which the waveguides of the present disclosure can be used will be described.
[0047] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a head mounted display. The head mounted display comprises a headpiece, which comprises a frame 2 having a central portion 4 intended to fit over the nose bridge of a wearer, and a left and right supporting extension 6,8 which are intended to fit over a user's ears. Although the supporting extensions are shown to be substantially straight, they could terminate with curved parts to more comfortably fit over the ears in the manner of conventional spectacles.
[0048] The frame 2 supports left and right optical components, labelled 10L and 10R, which are waveguides. For ease of reference herein an optical component 10 (which is a waveguide) will be considered to be either a left or right component, because the components are essentially identical apart from being mirror images of each other. Therefore, all description pertaining to the left-hand component also pertains to the right-hand component. The optical components will be described in more detail later with reference to FIG. 3 . The central portion 4 houses a light engine which is not shown in FIG. 1 but which is shown in FIG. 2 .
[0049] FIG. 2 shows a plan view of a section of the top part of the frame of FIG. 1 . Thus, FIG. 2 shows the light engine 13 which comprises a micro display 15 and imaging optics 17 in the form of a collimating lens 20. The light engine also includes a processor which is capable of generating an image for the micro display. The micro display can be any type of light of image source, such as liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) displays (LCD's), transmissive liquid crystal displays (LCD), matrix arrays of LED's (whether organic or inorganic) and any other suitable display. The display is driven by circuitry which is not visible in FIG. 2 which activates individual pixels of the display to generate an image. The substantially collimated light, from each pixel, falls on an exit pupil 22 of the light engine 13. At exit pupil 22, collimated light beams are coupled into each optical component, 10L, 10R into a respective in-coupling zone 12L, 12R provided on each component. These in-coupling zones are clearly shown in FIG. 1 , but are not readily visible in FIG. 2 . In-coupled light is then guided, through a mechanism that involves diffraction and TIR, laterally of the optical component in a respective intermediate (fold) zone 14L, 14R, and also downward into a respective exit zone 16L, 16R where it exits the component 10 towards the users' eye. The zones 14L, 14R, 16L and 16R are shown in FIG. 1 . These mechanisms are described in detail below. FIG. 2 shows a user's eye (right or left) receiving the diffracted light from an exit zone (16L or 16R). The output beam OB to a user's eye is parallel with the incident beam IB. See, for example, the beam marked IB in FIG. 2 and two of the parallel output beams marked OB in FIG. 2 . The optical component 10 is located between the light engine 13 and the eye i.e. the display system configuration is of so-called transmissive type.
[0050] Other headpieces are also within the scope of the subject matter. For instance, the display optics can equally be attached to the users head using a head band, helmet or other fit system. The purpose of the fit system is to support the display and provide stability to the display and other head borne systems such as tracking systems and cameras. The fit system will also be designed to meet user population in anthropometric range and head morphology and provide comfortable support of the display system.
[0051] Beams from the same display 15 may be coupled into both components 10L, 10R so that an image is perceived by both eyes from a single display, or separate displays may be used to generate different images for each eye e.g. to provide a stereoscopic image. In alternative headsets, light engine(s) may be mounted at one or both of left and right portions of the frame—with the arrangement of the incoupling, fold and exit zones 12, 14, 16 flipped accordingly.
[0052] The optical component 10 is substantially transparent such that a user can not only view the image from the light engine 13, but also can view a real world view through the optical components.
[0053] The optical component 10 has a refractive index n which is such that total internal reflection takes place guiding the beam from the incoupling zone along the intermediate expansion zone 14, and down towards the exit zone 16.
[0054] FIGS. 3A and 3B show an optical component in more detail.
[0055] FIG. 3A shows a perspective view of an optical component 10. The optical component is flat in that the front and rear portions of its surface are substantially flat (front and rear defined from the viewpoint of the wearer, as indicated by the location of the eye in FIG. 3A ). The front and rear portions of the surface are parallel to one another. The optical component 10 lies substantially in a plane (xy-plane), with the z axis (referred to as the “normal”) directed towards the viewer from the optical component 10. The incoupling, fold and exit zones 12, 14 and 16 are shown, each defined by respective surface modulations 52, 46 and 56 on the surface of the optical component, which are on the rear of the waveguide from a viewpoint of the wearer. Each of the surface modulations 52, 46, 56 forms a respective surface relief grating (SRG), the nature of which will be described shortly. Instead of the SRGs, holograms could be used providing the same optical function as the SRGs.
[0056] As shown in the plan view of FIG. 3B , the fold zone has a horizontal extent W2 (referred to herein as the “length” of the expansion zone) in the lateral (x) direction and an extent H2 in the y direction (referred to herein as the “length” of the expansion zone) which increases from the inner edge of the optical component to its outer edge in the lateral direction along its width W2. The exit zone has a horizontal extent W3 (length of the exit zone) and y-direction extent H3 (width of the exit zone) which define the size of the eye box, which size is independent of the imaging optics in the light engine. The incoupling and fold SRGs 52, 54 have a relative orientation angle A, as do the fold and exit SRGs 54, 56 (note the various dotted lines superimposed on the SRGs 52, 54, 56 denote directions perpendicular to the grating lines of those SRGs).
[0057] The incoupling and fold zones 12, 14 are substantially contiguous in that they are separated by at most a narrow border zone 18 which has a width W as measured along (that is, perpendicular to) a common border 19 that divides the border zone 18. The common border 19 is arcuate (substantially semi-circular in this example), the incoupling and fold regions 12, 14 having edges which are arcuate (substantially semi-circular) along the common border 19. The edge of incoupling region 12 is substantially circular overall.
[0058] Principles of the diffraction mechanisms which underlie operation of the head mounted display described herein will now be described with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B .
[0059] The optical components described herein interact with light by way of reflection, refractions and diffraction. Diffraction occurs when a propagating wave interacts with a structure, such as an obstacle or slit. Diffraction can be described as the interference of waves and is most pronounced when that structure is comparable in size to the wavelength of the wave. Optical diffraction of visible light is due to the wave nature of light and can be described as the interference of light waves. Visible light has wavelengths between approximately 390 and 700 nanometers (nm) and diffraction of visible light is most pronounced when propagating light encounters structures of a similar scale e.g. of order 100 or 1000 nm in scale.
[0060] One example of a diffractive structure is a periodic (substantially repeating) diffractive structure. Herein, a “diffraction grating” means any (part of) an optical component which has a periodic diffractive structure. Periodic structures can cause diffraction of light, which is typically most pronounced when the periodic structure has a spatial period of similar size to the wavelength of the light. Types of periodic structures include, for instance, surface modulations on the surface of an optical component, refractive index modulations, holograms etc. When propagating light encounters the periodic structure, diffraction causes the light to be split into multiple beams in different directions. These directions depend on the wavelength of the light thus diffractions gratings cause dispersion of polychromatic (e.g. white) light, whereby the polychromatic light is split into different coloured beams travelling in different directions.
[0061] When the periodic structure is on the surface of an optical component, it is referred to a surface grating. When the periodic structure is due to modulation of the surface itself, it is referred to as a surface relief grating (SRG). An example of a SRG is uniform straight grooves in a surface of an optical component that are separated by uniform straight groove spacing regions. Groove spacing regions are referred to herein as “lines”, “grating lines” and “filling regions”. The nature of the diffraction by a SRG depends both on the wavelength of light incident on the grating and various optical characteristics of the SRG, such as line spacing, groove depth and groove slant angle. An SRG can be fabricated by way of a suitable microfabrication process, which may involve etching of and/or deposition on a substrate to fabricate a desired periodic microstructure on the substrate to form an optical component, which may then be used as a production master such as a mould for manufacturing further optical components.
[0062] An SRG is an example of a Diffractive Optical Element (DOE). When a DOE is present on a surface (e.g. when the DOE is an SRG), the portion of that surface spanned by that DOE is referred to as a DOE area.
[0063] FIGS. 4A and 4B show from the top and the side respectively part of a substantially transparent optical component 10 having an outer surface S. At least a portion of the surface S exhibits surface modulations that constitute a SRG 44 (e.g. 52, 54, 56), which is a microstructure. Such a portion is referred to as a “grating area”. The modulations comprise grating lines which are substantially parallel and elongate (substantially longer than they are wide), and also substantially straight in this example (though they need not be straight in general).
[0064] FIG. 4B shows the optical component 10, and in particular the SRG 44, interacting with an incoming illuminating light beam I that is inwardly incident on the SRG 44. The light I is white light in this example, and thus has multiple colour components. The light I interacts with the SRG 44 which splits the light into several beams directed inwardly into the optical component 10. Some of the light I may also be reflected back from the surface S as a reflected beam R0. A zero-order mode inward beam T0 and any reflection R0 are created in accordance with the normal principles of diffraction as well as other non-zero-order (±n-order) modes (which can be explained as wave interference). FIG. 4B shows first-order inward beams T1, T−1; it will be appreciated that higher-order beams may or may not also be created depending on the configuration of the optical component 10. Because the nature of the diffraction is dependent on wavelength, for higher-order modes, different colour components (i.e. wavelength components) of the incident light I are, when present, split into beams of different colours at different angles of propagation relative to one another as illustrated in FIG. 4B .
[0065] FIGS. 5A-5C are close-up schematic cross sectional views of different exemplary SRGs 44a-44c (collectively referenced as 44 herein) that may be formed by modulation of the surface S of the optical component 10 (which is viewed from the side in these figures). Light beams are denoted as arrows whose thicknesses denote approximate relative intensity (with higher intensity beams shown as thicker arrows).
[0066] FIG. 5A shows an example of a straight binary SRG 44a. The straight binary SRG 44a is formed of a series of grooves 7a in the surface S separated by protruding groove spacing regions 9a which are also referred to herein as “filling regions”, “grating lines” or simply “lines”. The SRG 44a has a spatial period of d (referred to as the “grating period”), which is the distance over which the modulations' shape repeats and which is thus the distance between adjacent lines/grooves. The grooves 7a have a depth h and have substantially straight walls and substantially flat bases. The filling regions have a height h and a width that is substantially uniform over the height h of the filling regions, labelled “w” in FIG. 2A (with w being some fraction f of the period: w=f*d).
[0067] For a straight binary SRG, the walls are substantially perpendicular to the surface S. The SRG 44a causes symmetric diffraction of incident light I that is entering perpendicularly to the surface, in that each +n-order mode beam (e.g. T1) created by the SRG 4a has substantially the same intensity as the corresponding −n-order mode beam (e.g. T−1), typically less than about one fifth (0.2) of the intensity of the incident beam I.
[0068] FIG. 5B shows an example of a slanted binary SRG 44b. The slanted binary SRG 44b is also formed of grooves, labelled 7b, in the surface S having substantially straight walls and substantially flat bases separated by lines 9b of width w. However, in contrast to the straight SRG 44a, the walls are slanted by an amount relative to the normal, denoted by the angle β in FIG. 25B . The grooves 7b have a depth h as measured along the normal. Due to the asymmetry introduced by the non-zero slant, ±n-order mode inward beams travelling away from the slant direction have greater intensity that their ∓n-order mode counterparts (e.g. in the example of FIG. 2B , the T1 beam is directed away from the direction of slant and has usually greater intensity than the T−1 beam, though this depends on e.g. the grating period d); by increasing the slant by a sufficient amount, those ∓n counterparts can be substantially eliminated (i.e. to have substantially zero intensity). The intensity of the T0 beam is typically also very much reduced by a slanted binary SRG such that, in the example of FIG. 5B , the first-order beam T1 typically has an intensity of at most about four fifths (0.8) the intensity of the incident beam I but this is highly dependent on wavelength and incident angle.
[0069] The binary SRGs 44a and 44b can be viewed as spatial waveforms embedded in the surface S that have a substantially square wave shape (with period d). In the case of the SRG 44b, the shape is a skewed square wave shape skewed by β.
[0070] FIG. 5C shows an example of an overhanging triangular SRG 44c which is a special case of an overhanging trapezoidal SRG. The triangular SRG 44c is formed of grooves 7c in the surface S that are triangular in shape (and which thus have discernible tips) and which have a depth h as measured along the normal. Filling regions 9c take the form of triangular, tooth-like protrusions (teeth), having medians that make an angle β with the normal (β being the slant angle of the SRG 44c). The teeth have tips that are separated by d (which is the grating period of the SRG 44c), a width that is w at the base of the teeth and which narrows to substantially zero at the tips of the teeth. For the SRG of FIG. 44c , w≈d, but generally can be w<d. The SRG is overhanging in that the tips of the teeth extend over the tips of the grooves. It is possible to construct overhanging triangular SRGs that substantially eliminate both the transmission-mode T0 beam and the ∓n-mode beams, leaving only ±n-order mode beams (e.g. only T1). The grooves have walls which are at an angle γ to the median (wall angle).
[0071] The SRG 44c can be viewed as a spatial waveform embedded in S that has a substantially triangular wave shape, which is skewed by β.
[0072] Other SRGs are also possible, for example other types of trapezoidal SRGs (which may not narrow in width all the way to zero), sinusoidal SRGs etc. Such other SRGs also exhibit depth h, linewidth w, slant angle β and wall angles γ which can be defined in a similar manner to FIG. 5A-C .
[0073] In the present display system, d is typically between about 250 and 500 nm, and h between about 30 and 400 nm. The slant angle β is typically between about 0 and 45 degrees (such that slant direction is typically elevated above the surface S by an amount between about 45 and 90 degrees).
[0074] An SRG has a diffraction efficiency defined in terms of the intensity of desired diffracted beam(s) (e.g. T1) relative to the intensity of the illuminating beam I, and can be expressed as a ratio η of those intensities. As will be apparent from the above, slanted binary SRGs can achieve higher efficiency (e.g. 4b—up to η≈0.8 if T1 is the desired beam) than non-slanted SRGs (e.g. 44a—only up to about η≈0.2 if T1 is the desired beam). With overhanging triangular SRGs, it is possible to achieve near-optimal efficiencies of η≈1.
[0075] FIG. 6 shows the incoupling SRG 52 with greater clarity, including an expanded version showing how the light beam interacts with it. FIG. 6 shows a plan view of the optical component 10. The light engine 13 provides beams of collimated light, one of which is shown (corresponding to a display pixel). That beam falls on the incoupling SRG 52 and thus causes total internal reflection of the beam in the component 10. The intermediate grating 14 directs versions of the beams down to the exit grating 16, which causes diffraction of the image onto the user's eye. The operation of the grating 12 is shown in more detail in the expanded portion which shows rays of the incoming light beam coming in from the left and denoted I and those rays being diffracted so as to undergo TIR in the optical component 10. The grating in FIG. 6 is of the type shown in FIG. 5B but could also be of the type shown in FIG. 5C or some other slanted grating shape.
[0076] Optical principles underlying certain embodiments will now be described with reference to FIGS. 7A-9B .
[0077] Collimating optics of the display system is arranged to substantially collimate an image on a display of the display system into multiple input beams. Each beam is formed by collimating light from a respective image point, that beam directed to the incoupling grating in a unique inward direction which depends on the location of that point in the image. The multiple input beams thus form a virtual version of the image. The intermediate and exit grating have widths substantially larger than the beams' diameters. The incoupling grating is arranged to couple each beam into the intermediate grating, in which that beam is guided onto multiple splitting regions of the intermediate grating in a direction along the width of the intermediate grating. The intermediate grating is arranged to split that beam at the splitting regions to provide multiple substantially parallel versions of that beam. Those multiple versions are coupled into the exit grating, in which the multiple versions are guided onto multiple exit regions of the exit grating. The exit regions lie in a direction along the width of the exit grating. The exit grating is arranged to diffract the multiple versions of that beam outwardly, substantially in parallel and in an outward direction which substantially matches the unique inward direction in which that beam was incoupled. The multiple input beams thus cause multiple exit beams to exit the waveguide which form substantially the same virtual version of the image.
[0078] FIG. 7a shows a perspective view of the display 15, imaging optics 17 and incoupling SRG 52. Different geometric points on the region of the display 15 on which an image is displayed are referred to herein as image points, which may be active (currently emitting light) or inactive (not currently emitting light). In practice, individual pixels can be approximated as image points.
[0079] The imaging optics 17 can typically be approximated as a principal plane (thin lens approximation) or, in some cases, more accurately as a pair of principal planes (thick lens approximation) the location(s) of which are determined by the nature and arrangement of its constituent lenses. In these approximations, any refraction caused by the imaging optics 17 is approximated as occurring at the principal plane(s). To avoid unnecessary complication, principles of various embodiments will be described in relation to a thin lens approximation of the imaging optics 17, and thus in relation to a single principal plane labelled 31 in FIG. 7a , but it will be apparent that more complex imaging optics that do not fit this approximation still can be utilized to achieve the desired effects.
[0080] The imaging optics 17 has an optical axis 30 and a front focal point, and is positioned relative to the optical component 10 so that the optical axis 30 intersects the incoupling SRG 52 at or near the geometric centre of the incoupling SRG 52 with the front focal point lying substantially at an image point X0 on the display (that is, lying in the same plane as the front of the display). Another arbitrary image point X on the display is shown, and principles underlying various embodiments will now be described in relation to X without loss of generality. In the following, the terminology “for each X” or similar is used as a convenient shorthand to mean “for each image point (including X)” or similar, as will be apparent in context.
[0081] When active, image points—including the image point labelled X and X0—act as individual illumination point sources from which light propagates in a substantially isotropic manner through the half-space forward of the display 15. Image points in areas of the image perceived as lighter emit light of higher intensity relative to areas of the image perceived as darker. Image points in areas perceived as black emit no or only very low intensity light (inactive image points). The intensity of the light emitted by a particular image point may change as the image changes, for instance when a video is displayed on the display 15.
[0082] Each active image point provides substantially uniform illumination of a collimating area A of the imaging optics 17, which is substantially circular and has a diameter D that depends on factors such as the diameters of the constituent lenses (typically D is of order 1-10 mm). This is illustrated for the image point X in FIG. 7a , which shows how any propagating light within a cone 32(X) from X is incident on the collimating area A. The imaging optics collimates any light 32(X) incident on the collimating area A to form a collimated beam 34(X) of diameter D (input beam), which is directed towards the incoupling grating 52 of the optical component 10. The beam 34(X) is thus incident on the incoupling grating 52. A shielding component (not shown) may be arranged to prevent any un-collimated light from outside of the cone 32(X) that is emitted from X from reaching the optical component 10.
[0083] The beam 34(X) corresponding to the image point X is directed in an inward propagation direction towards the incoupling SRG 52, which can be described by a propagation vector {circumflex over (k)}in (X) (herein, bold typeface is used to denote 3-dimensional vectors, with hats on such vectors indicating denoting a unit vector). The inward propagation direction depends on the location of X in the image and, moreover, is unique to X. That unique propagation direction can be parameterized in terms of an azimuthal angle φin(X) (which is the angle between the x-axis and the projection of {circumflex over (k)}in (X) in the xy-plane) and a polar angle θin(X)(which is the angle between the z-axis and {circumflex over (k)}in (P) as measured in the plane in which both the z-axis and {circumflex over (k)}in (X) lie—note this is not the xz-plane in general). The notation φin(X), θin(X) is adopted to denote the aforementioned dependence on X; as indicated φin(X), θin(X) are unique to that X. Note that, herein, both such unit vectors and such polar/azimuthal angle pairs parameterizing such vectors are sometimes referred herein to as “directions” (as the latter represent complete parameterizations thereof), and that sometimes azimuthal angles are referred to in isolation as xy-directions for the same reason. Note further that “inward” is used herein to refer to propagation that is towards the waveguide (having a positive z-component when propagation is towards the rear of the waveguide as perceived by the viewer and a negative z-component when propagation is towards the front of the waveguide).
[0084] The imaging optics has a principle point P, which is the point at which the optical axis 30 intersects the principal plane 31 and which typically lies at or near the centre of the collimation area A. The inward direction {circumflex over (k)}in (X) and the optical axis 30 have an angular separation β(X) equal to the angle subtended by X and X0 from P. β(X)=θin(X) if the optical axis is parallel to the z-axis (which is not necessarily the case).
[0085] As will be apparent, the above applies for each active image point and the imaging optics is thus arranged to substantially collimate the image which is currently on the display 15 into multiple input beams, each corresponding to and propagating in a unique direction determined by the location of a respective active image point (active pixel in practice). That is, the imaging optics 17 effectively converts each active point source X into a collimated beam in a unique inward direction {circumflex over (k)}in (X). As will be apparent, this can be equivalently stated as the various input beams for all the active image points forming a virtual image at infinity that corresponds to the real image that is currently on the display 17. A virtual image of this nature is sometimes referred to herein as a virtual version of the image (or similar).
[0086] The input beam corresponding to the image point X0 (not shown) would propagate parallel to the optical axis 30, towards or near the geometric centre of the incoupling SRG 52.
[0087] As mentioned, in practice, individual pixels of the display 15 can be approximated as single image points. This is illustrated in FIG. 7B which is a schematic plan view showing the principal plane 31 and two adjacent pixels Xa, Xb of the display 15, whose centres subtend an angle Δβ from the principal point P. Light emitted the pixels Xa, Xb when active is effectively converted into collimated beams 34(Xa), 34(Xb) having an angular separation equal to Δβ. As will be apparent, the scale of the pixels Xa, Xb has been greatly enlarged for the purposes of illustration.
[0088] The beams are highly collimated, having an angular range no greater than the angle subtended by an individual pixel from P (˜Δβ) e.g. typically having an angular range no more than about ½ milliradian. As will become apparent in view of the following, this increases the image quality of the final image as perceived by the wearer.
[0089] FIGS. 7C and 7D show schematic plan (xz) and frontal (yz) views of part of the optical component respectively. As indicated in these figures, the incoupling grating 52 causes diffraction of the beam 34(X) thereby causing a first (±1) order mode beam to propagate within the optical component 10 in a new direction {circumflex over (k)}(X) that is generally towards the fold SRG 54 (i.e. that has a positive x-component). The new direction {circumflex over (k)}(X) can be parameterized by azimuthal and polar angles φ(X)—where |φ(X)|≦|φin(X)| and θ(X)—where |θ(X)|>|θin(X)|—which are also determined by the location of and unique to the image point X. The grating 52 is configured so that the first order mode is the only significant diffraction mode, with the intensity of this new beam thus substantially matching that of the input beam. As mentioned above, a slanted grating can be used to achieve this desired effect (the beam as directed away from the incoupling SRG 52 would correspond, for instance, to beam T1 as shown in FIG. 4B or 4C ). In this manner, the beam 34(X) is coupled into the incoupling zone 12 of the optical component 10 in the new direction {circumflex over (k)}(X).
[0090] The optical component has a refractive index n and is configured such that the polar angle θ(X) satisfies total internal reflection criteria given by:
sin 0(X)>1/n for each X. (1):
As will be apparent, each beam input from the imaging optics 17 thus propagates through the optical component 10 by way of total internal reflection (TIR) in a generally horizontal (+x) direction (offset from the x-axis by φ(X)<φin(X)). In this manner, the beam 34(X) is coupled from the incoupling zone 12 into the fold zone 14, in which it propagates along the width of the fold zone 14.
sin 0(X)>1/n for each X. (1):
As will be apparent, each beam input from the imaging optics 17 thus propagates through the optical component 10 by way of total internal reflection (TIR) in a generally horizontal (+x) direction (offset from the x-axis by φ(X)<φin(X)). In this manner, the beam 34(X) is coupled from the incoupling zone 12 into the fold zone 14, in which it propagates along the width of the fold zone 14.
[0091] FIG. 7E shows 10 a frontal (xy) view of the whole of the optical component 10, from a viewpoint similar to that of the wearer. As explained in more detail below, a combination of diffractive beam splitting and total internal reflection within the optical component 10 results in multiple versions of each input beam 34(X) being outwardly diffracted from the exit SRG along both the length and the width of the exit zone 16 as output beams 38(X) in respective outward directions (that is, away from the optical component 10) that substantially match the respective inward direction {circumflex over (k)}in (X) of the corresponding input beam 34(X).
[0092] In FIG. 7E , beams external to the optical component 10 are represented using shading and dotted lines are used to represent beams within the optical component 10. Perspective is used to indicate propagation in the z-direction, with widening (resp. narrowing) of the beams in FIG. 7E representing propagation in the positive (resp. negative) z direction; that is towards (resp. away from) the wearer. Thus, diverging dotted lines represent beams within the optical component 10 propagating towards the front wall of the optical component 10; the widest parts represent those beams striking the front wall of the optical component 10, from which they are totally internally reflected back towards the rear wall (on which the various SRGs are formed), which is represented by the dotted lines converging from the widest points to the narrowest points at which they are incident on the rear wall. Regions where the various beams are incident on the fold and exit SRGs are labelled S and E and termed splitting and exit regions respectively for reasons that will become apparent.
[0093] As illustrated, the input beam 34(X) is coupled into the waveguide by way of the aforementioned diffraction by the incoupling SRG 52, and propagates along the width of the incoupling zone 12 by way of TIR in the direction φ(X), ±θ(X) (the sign but not the magnitude of the polar angle changing whenever the beam is reflected). As will be apparent, this results in the beam 34(X) eventually striking the fold SRG at the left-most splitting region S.
[0094] When the beam 34(X) is incident at a splitting region S, that incident beam 34(X) is effectively split in two by way of diffraction to create a new version of that beam 42(X) (specifically a −1 reflection mode beam) which directed in a specific and generally downwards (−y) direction φ′(X), ±θ′(X) towards the exit zone 16 due to the fold SRG 54 having a particular configuration which will be described in due course, in addition to a zero order reflection mode beam (specular reflection beam), which continues to propagate along the width of the beam in the same direction φ(X), ±θ(X) just as the beam 34(X) would in the absence of the fold SRG (albeit at a reduced intensity). Thus, the beam 34(X) effectively continues propagates along substantially the whole width of the fold zone 14, striking the fold SRG at various splitting regions S, with another new version of the beam (in the same specific downward direction φ′(X), ±θ′(X)) created at each splitting region S. As shown in FIG. 7E , this results in multiple versions of the beam 34(X) being coupled into the exit zone 16, which are horizontally separated so as to collectively span substantially the width of the exit zone 16.
[0095] As also shown in FIG. 7E , a new version 42(X) of the beam as created at a splitting region S may itself strike the fold SRG during its downward propagation. This will result in a zero order mode being created which continues to propagate generally downwards in the direction φ′(X), ±θ′(X) and which can be viewed as continued propagation of that beam, but may also result in a non-zero order mode beam 40(X) (further new version) being created by way of diffraction. However, any such beam 40(X) created by way of such double diffraction at the same SRG will propagate in substantially the same direction φ(X), ±θ(X) along the width of the fold zone 14 as the original beam 34(X) as coupled into the optical component 10 (see below). Thus, notwithstanding the possibility of multiple diffractions by the fold SRG, propagation of the various versions of the beam 34(X) (corresponding to image point X) within the optical component 10 is effectively limited to two xy-directions: the generally horizontal direction (φ(X), ±θ(X)), and the specific and generally downward direction (φ′(X), ±θ′(X)) that will be discussed shortly.
[0096] Propagation within the fold zone 14 is thus highly regular, with all beam versions corresponding to a particular image point X substantially constrained to a lattice like structure in the manner illustrated.
[0097] The exit zone 16 is located below the fold zone 14 and thus the downward-propagating versions of the beam 42(X) are coupled into the exit zone 16, in which they are guided onto the various exit regions E of the output SRG. The exit SRG 56 is configured so as, when a version of the beam strikes the output SRG, that beam is diffracted to create a first order mode beam directed outwardly from the exit SRG 56 in an outward direction that substantially matches the unique inward direction in which the original beam 34(X) corresponding to image point X was inputted. Because there are multiple versions of the beam propagating downwards that are substantially span the width of the exit zone 16, multiple output beams are generated across the width of the exit zone 16 (as shown in FIG. 7E ) to provide effective horizontal beam expansion.
[0098] Moreover, the exit SRG 56 is configured so that, in addition to the outwardly diffracted beams 38(X) being created at the various exit regions E from an incident beam, a zero order diffraction mode beam continuous to propagate downwards in the same specific direction as that incident beam. This, in turn, strikes the exit SRG at a lower exit zone 16s in the manner illustrated in FIG. 7E , resulting in both continuing zero-order and outward first order beams. Thus, multiple output beams 38(X) are also generated across substantially the width of the exit zone 16 to provide effective vertical beam expansion.
[0099] The output beams 38(X) are directed outwardly in outward directions that substantially match the unique input direction in which the original beam 34(X) is inputted. In this context, substantially matching means that the outward direction is related to the input direction in a manner that enables the wearer's eye to focus any combination of the output beams 38(X) to a single point on the retina, thus reconstructing the image point X (see below).
[0100] For a flat optical component (that is, whose front and rear surfaces lie substantially parallel to the xy-plane in their entirety), the output beams are substantially parallel to one another (to at least within the angle Δβ subtended by two adjacent display pixels) and propagate outwardly in an output propagation direction {circumflex over (k)}out(X) that is parallel to the unique inward direction {circumflex over (k)}in (X) in which the corresponding input beam 34(X) was directed to the incoupling SRG 52. That is, directing the beam 34(X) corresponding to the image point X to the incoupling SRG 52 in the inward direction {circumflex over (k)}in (X) causes corresponding output beams 38(X) to be diffracted outwardly and in parallel from the exit zone 16, each in an outward propagation direction {circumflex over (k)}out(X)={circumflex over (k)}in (X) due to the configuration of the various SRGs (see below).
[0101] As will now be described with reference to FIG. 7F , this enables a viewer's eye to reconstruct the image when looking at the exit zone 16. FIG. 7F shows a plan (xz) view of the optical component 10. The input beam 34(X) is in coupled to the optical component 10 resulting in multiple parallel output beams 38(X) being created at the various exit regions E in the manner discussed above. This can be equivalently expressed at the various output beams corresponding to all the image points forming the same virtual image (at infinity) as the corresponding input beams.
[0102] Because the beams 38(X) corresponding to the image point X are all substantially parallel, any light of one or more of the beam(s) 38(X) which is received by the eye 37 is focussed as if the eye 37 were perceiving an image at infinity (i.e. a distant image). The eye 37 thus focuses such received light onto a single retina point, just as if the light were being received from the imaging optics 17 directly, thus reconstructing the image point X (e.g. pixel) on the retina. As will be apparent, the same is true of each active image point (e.g. pixel) so that the eye 37 reconstructs the whole image that is currently on the display 15.
[0103] However, in contrast to receiving the image directly from the optics 17—from which only a respective single beam 34(X) of diameter D is emitted for each X—the output beams 39(X) are emitted over a significantly wider area i.e. substantially that of the exit zone 16, which is substantially larger than the area of the inputted beam (˜D2). It does not matter which (parts) of the beam(s) 38(X) the eye receives as all are focused to the same retina point—e.g., were the eye 37 to be moved horizontally (±x) in FIG. 7F , it is apparent that the image will still be perceived. Thus, no adaptation of the display system is required for, say, viewers with different pupillary distances beyond making the exit zone 16 wide enough to anticipate a reasonable range of pupillary distances: whilst viewers whose eyes are closer together will generally receive light from the side of the exit zone 16 nearer the incoupling zone 12 as compared with viewers whose eyes are further apart, both will nonetheless perceive the same image. Moreover, as the eye 27 rotates, different parts of the image are brought towards the centre of the viewer's field of vision (as the angle of the beams relative to the optical axis of the eye changes) with the image still remaining visible, thereby allowing the viewer to focus their attention on different parts of the image as desired.
[0104] The same relative angular separation Δβ exhibited the input beams corresponding any two adjacent pixels Xa, Xb is also exhibited by the corresponding sets of output beams 38(Xa), 38(Xb)—thus adjacent pixels are focused to adjacent retina points by the eye 37. All the various versions of the beam remain highly collimated as they propagate through the optical component 10, preventing significant overlap of pixel images as focused on the retina, thereby preserving image sharpness.
[0105] It should be noted that FIGS. 7A-7G are not to scale and that in particular beams diameters are, for the sake of clarity, generally reduced relative to components such as the display 15 than would typically be expected in practice.
[0106] The configuration of the incoupling SRG 52 will now be described with reference to FIGS. 8A and 8B , which show schematic plan and frontal views of part of the fold grating 52. Note, in FIGS. 8A and 8B , beams are represented by arrows (that is, their area is not represented) for the sake of clarity.
[0107] FIG. 8A shows two image points XL, XR located at the far left and far right of the display 15 respectively, from which light is collimated by the optics 17 to generate respective input beams 34(XL), 34(XR) in inward directions (θin(XL), φin(XL)), (θin(XR), φin (XR)). These beams are coupled into the optical component 10 by the incoupling SRG 52 as shown—the incoupled beams shown created at the incoupling SRG 52 are first order (+1) mode beams created by way of diffraction of the beams incident on the SRG 52. The beams 34(XL), 34(XR) as coupled into the waveguide propagate in directions defined by the polar angles θ(XL), θ(XR).
[0108] FIG. 8B shows two image points XR1 and XR2 at the far top-right and far bottom-right of the display 15. Note in this figure dashed-dotted lines denote aspects which are behind the optical component 10 (−z). Corresponding beams 34(XL), 34(XR) in directions within the optical component 10 with polar angles φ(XL), φ(XR).
[0109] Such angles θ(X), φ(X) are given by the (transmissive) grating equations:
n sin θ(X)sin φ(X)=sin θin(X)sin φin(X) (2)
n sin θ(X)sin φ(X)=sin θin(X)sin φin(X) (2)
[0110]
with the SRG 52 having a grating period d1, the beam light having a wavelength λ, and n the refractive index of the optical component.
with the SRG 52 having a grating period d1, the beam light having a wavelength λ, and n the refractive index of the optical component.
[0111] It is straightforward to show from (2), (3) that θ(XL)=θmax and θ(XR)=θmin i.e. that any beam as coupled into the component 10 propagates with an initial polar angle in the range [θ(XR), θ(XL)]; and that φ(XR2)=φmax and φ(XR1)=φmin (≈−φmax in this example) i.e. that any beam as coupled into the component initially propagates with an azimuthal angle in the range [φ(XR1), φ(XR2)](≈[−φ(XR2), φ(XR2)]).
[0112] The configuration of the fold SRG 54 will now be described with references to FIGS. 9A-9B . Note, in FIGS. 9A and 9B , beams are again represented by arrows, without any representation of their areas, for the sake of clarity. In these figures, dotted lines denote orientations perpendicular to the fold SRG grating lines, dashed lines orientations perpendicular to the incoupling SRG grating lines, and dash-dotted lines orientations perpendicular to the exit SRG grating lines.
[0113] FIG. 9A shows a perspective view of the beam 34(X) as coupled into the fold zone 14 of the optical component 10, having been reflected from the front wall of the optical component 10 and thus travelling in the direction (φ(X), −θ(X)) towards the fold SRG 54. A dotted line (which lies perpendicular to the fold SRG grating lines) is shown to represent the orientation of the fold SRG.
[0114] The fold SRG 54 and incoupling SRG 52 have a relative orientation angle A (which is the angle between their respective grating lines). The beam thus makes an angle A+φ(X) (see FIG. 9B ) with the fold SRG grating lines as measured in the xy-plane. The beam 34 is incident on the fold SRG 54, which diffracts the beam 34 into different components. A zero order reflection mode (specular reflection) beam is created which continues to propagate in the direction (φ(X), +θ(X)) just as the beam 34(X) would due to reflection in the absence of the fold SRG 54 (albeit at a reduced intensity). This specular reflection beam can be viewed as effectively a continuation of the beam 34(X) and for this reason is also labelled 34(X). A first order (−1) reflection mode beam 42(X) is also created which can be effectively considered a new version of the beam.
[0115] As indicated, the new version of the beam 42(X) propagates in a specific direction (φ′(X), θ′(X)) which is given by the known (reflective) grating equations:
n sin θ′(X)sin(A+φ′(X))=n sin θ(X)sin(A+φ(X)) (4)
n sin θ′(X)sin(A+φ′(X))=n sin θ(X)sin(A+φ(X)) (4)
[0116]
where the fold SRG has a grating period d2, the beam light has a wavelength λ and n is the refractive index of the optical component 10.
where the fold SRG has a grating period d2, the beam light has a wavelength λ and n is the refractive index of the optical component 10.
[0117] As shown in FIG. 9B , which shows a schematic frontal view of the optical component 10, the beam 34(X) is coupled into the incoupling zone 12 with azimuthal angle φ(X) and thus makes an xy-angle φ(X)+A the fold SRG 54.
[0118] A first new version 42a(X) (−1 mode) of the beam 34(X) is created when it is first diffracted by the fold SRG 54 and a second new version 42b(X) (−1 mode) when it is next diffracted by the fold SRG 54 (and so on), which both propagate in xy-direction φ′(X). In this manner, the beam 34(X) is effectively split into multiple versions, which are horizontally separated (across the width of the fold zone 14). These are directed down towards the exit zone 16 and thus coupled into the exit zone 16 (across substantially the width of the exit zone 16 due to the horizontal separation). As can be see, the multiple versions are thus incident on the various exit regions (labelled E) of the exit SRG 56, which lie along the width of the exit zone 16.
[0119] These new, downward (−y)-propagating versions may themselves meet the fold SRG once again, as illustrated. However, it can be shown from (4), (5) that any first order reflection mode beam (e.g. 40a(X), +1 mode) created by diffraction at an SRG of an incident beam (e.g. 42a(X), −1 mode) which is itself a first order reflection mode beam created by an earlier diffraction of an original beam (e.g. 34(X)) at the same SRG will revert to the direction of the original beam (e.g. φ(X), ±θ(X), which is the direction of propagation of 40a(X)). Thus, propagation within the fold zone 14 is restricted to a diamond-like lattice, as can be seen from the geometry of FIG. 9B . The beam labelled 42ab(X) is a superposition of a specular reflection beam created when 42b(X) meets the fold SRG 54 and a −1 mode beam created when 40a(X) meets the fold SRG at substantially the same location; the beam labelled 42ab(X) is a superposition of a specular reflection beam created when 40a(X) meets the fold SRG 54 and a +1 mode beam created when 42b(X) meets the fold SRG at substantially the same location (and so on).
[0120] The exit SRG and incoupling SRG 52, 56 are oriented with a relative orientation angle A′ (which is the angle between their respective grating lines). At each of the exit regions, the version meeting that region is diffracted so that, in addition to a zero order reflection mode beam propagating downwards in the direction φ′(X), ±θ′(X), a first order (+1) transmission mode beam 38(X) which propagates away from the optical component 10 in an outward direction φout(X), θout (X) given by:
sin θout(X)sin(A′+φout(X))=n sin θ′(X)sin(A′+φ′(X)) (6)
sin θout(X)sin(A′+φout(X))=n sin θ′(X)sin(A′+φ′(X)) (6)
[0121]
[0122] The output direction θout(X), φout(X) is that of the output beams outside of the waveguide (propagating in air). For a flat waveguide, equations (6), (7) hold both when the exit grating is on the front of the waveguide—in which case the output beams are first order transmission mode beams (as can be seen, equations (6), (7) correspond to the known transmission grating equations)—but also when the exit grating is on the rear of the waveguide (as in FIG. 7F )—in which case the output beams correspond to first order reflection mode beams which, upon initial reflection from the rear exit grating propagate in a direction θ′out(X), φ′out(X) within the optical component 10 given by:
n sin θ′out(X)sin(A′+φ′out(X))=n sin θ′(X)sin(A′+φ′(X)) (6′)
n sin θ′out(X)sin(A′+φ′out(X))=n sin θ′(X)sin(A′+φ′(X)) (6′)
[0123]
these beams are then refracted at the front surface of the optical component, and thus exit the optical component in a direction θin (X), φin(X) given by Snell's law:
sin θout(X)=n sin θ′out(X) (8)
φ′out(X)=φout(X) (9)
As will be apparent, the conditions of equations (6), (7) follow straight forwardly from (6′), (7′), (8) and (9). Note that such refraction at the front surface, whilst not readily visible inFIG. 7F , will nonetheless occur in the arrangement of FIG. 7F .
It can be shown from the equations (2-7) that, when
d=d1=d3 (10)
(that is, when the periods of the incoupling and exit SRGs 52, 56 substantially match);
d2=d/(2 cos A); (11)
and
A′=2A; (12)
then (θout (X), φout(X))=(θin (X), φin (X)).
Moreover, when the condition
these beams are then refracted at the front surface of the optical component, and thus exit the optical component in a direction θin (X), φin(X) given by Snell's law:
sin θout(X)=n sin θ′out(X) (8)
φ′out(X)=φout(X) (9)
As will be apparent, the conditions of equations (6), (7) follow straight forwardly from (6′), (7′), (8) and (9). Note that such refraction at the front surface, whilst not readily visible in
It can be shown from the equations (2-7) that, when
d=d1=d3 (10)
(that is, when the periods of the incoupling and exit SRGs 52, 56 substantially match);
d2=d/(2 cos A); (11)
and
A′=2A; (12)
then (θout (X), φout(X))=(θin (X), φin (X)).
Moreover, when the condition
[0124]
is met, no modes besides the above-mentioned first order and zero order reflection modes are created by diffraction at the fold SRG 54. That is, no additional undesired beams are created in the fold zone when this criteria is met. The condition (13) is met for a large range of A, from about 0 to 70 degrees.
is met, no modes besides the above-mentioned first order and zero order reflection modes are created by diffraction at the fold SRG 54. That is, no additional undesired beams are created in the fold zone when this criteria is met. The condition (13) is met for a large range of A, from about 0 to 70 degrees.
[0125] In other words, when these criteria are met, the exit SRG 56 effectively acts as an inverse to the incoupling SRG 52, reversing the effect of the incoupling SRG diffraction for each version of the beam with which it interacts, thereby outputting what is effectively a two-dimensionally expanded version of that beam 34(X) having an area substantially that of the exit SRG 56 (>>D2 and which, as noted, is independent of the imaging optics 17) in the same direction as the original beam was inputted to the component 10 so that the outwardly diffracted beams form substantially the same virtual image as the inwardly inputted beams but which is perceivable over a much larger area.
[0126] In the example of FIG. 9B , A≈45° i.e. so that the fold SRG and exit SRGs 54, 56 are oriented at substantially 45 and 90 degrees to the incoupling SRG 52 respectively, with the grating period of the fold region
[0127]
However, this is only an example and, in fact, the overall efficiency of the display system is typically increased when A≧50°.
However, this is only an example and, in fact, the overall efficiency of the display system is typically increased when A≧50°.
[0128] The above considers flat optical components, but a suitably curved optical component (that is, having a radius of curvature extending substantially along the z direction) can be configured to function as an effective lens such that the output beams 30(X) are and are no longer as highly collimated and are not parallel, but have specific relative direction and angular separations such that each traces back to a common point of convergence—this is illustrated in FIG. 7G , in which the common point of convergence is labelled Q. Moreover, when every image point is considered, the various points of convergence for all the different active image points lie in substantially the same plane, labelled 50, located a distance L from the eye 37 so that the eye 37 can focus accordingly to perceive the whole image as if it were the distance L away. This can be equivalently stated as the various output beams forming substantially the same virtual version of the current display image as the corresponding input beams, but at the distance L from the eye 37 rather than at infinity. Curved optical components may be particularly suitable for short-sighted eyes unable to properly focus distant images.
[0129] Note, in general the “width” of the fold and exit zones does not have to be their horizontal extent—in general, the width of a fold or exit zone 14, 16 is that zone's extent in the general direction in which light is coupled into the fold zone 14 from the incoupling zone 12 (which is horizontal in the above examples, but more generally is a direction substantially perpendicular to the grating lines of the incoupling zone 12).
[0130] As indicated, phase distortions caused by diffractive optical elements imprinted on the surface of a waveguide—such as the SRGs 52, 54, 56—can degrade image quality in a display system of the kind described above. In accordance with the present disclosure, this can be mitigated by introducing suitable height offsets (i.e. in a direction substantially normal to the surface on which they are present) of the optical elements relative to one other and relative to the blank surface of the waveguide.
[0131] FIG. 12A shows a side view of a part of a first waveguide 10c of one embodiment, which is suitable for use in a display system of the kind described above. The waveguide 10c has a first diffractive optical element O1 (e.g. one of the incoupling, fold or exit SRGs 52, 54, 56) and a second diffractive optical element (e.g. another of the incoupling, fold or exit SRG 52, 54, 56) imprinted on its surface (for example on the rear of the waveguide 10c, from the perspective of the viewer). The gratings O1, O2 are separated by a blank surface region B, which—as in the waveguide of FIGS. 10A and 10B —causes light to change phase by φ0 upon reflection from the blank surface region B. The blank region B could for instance be the region W of FIG. 3B between the incoupling and fold SRGs 52, 54, or the unlabelled region between the fold and exit SRGs 54, 56.
[0132] The optical elements have the same structure (in particular, the same depths h1, h2≠h1) as those in FIGS. 10A and 10B , with the first optical element O1 causing light to change phase by φ1=φ0−Δφ1 upon reflection therefrom and the second optical element O2 causing light to change phase by φ2=φ0−Δφ2 upon reflection therefrom.
[0133] The depths h1, h2≠h1 are, in contrast to the apodized gratings of FIG. 11A , substantially constant over the entire area of the gratings O1, O2 respectively, right up to the edges of the gratings O1, O2. Alternatively the depths may vary as a function of position (x,y) i.e. as functions h1(x,y), h2(x,y), but nevertheless falls sharply to zero at the edges of the grating i.e. with a significantly steeper gradient than the apodized edges of the regions A1, A2 in FIG. 11A .
[0134] Moreover, in contrast to the waveguides 10a, 10b of FIGS. 10A, 10B and 11A , the optical elements O1 and O2 gratings are at offset height with respect to the blank TIR surface. Each height offset is selected such that the additional optical path length introduced by that offset substantially matches the phase difference between reflection from the respective grating region and TIR. The additional optical path length is the product of the refractive index n of the waveguide 10c and the additional distance which light traverses as a result of the offset.
[0135] The gratings O1, O2 are offset by distances Δh1 and Δh2 in the z-direction (i.e. in a direction substantially normal to the surface on which they are imprinted) respectively. The expanded view at the top of FIG. 12A shows this offset in detail: in contrast to FIG. 10A , the tops of the filling regions of O1 and O2 are not level with the blank surface portion B, but are offset from B by Δh1 and Δh2 respectively.
[0136] The offsets Δh1 and Δh2 substantially match Δφ1 and Δφ2 respectively. That is, each offset Δh1, Δh2 is such as to increase the length of the optical path traversed by a ray R1, R2 reflected at the respective grating O1, O2 relative to a ray R0 reflected at the blank surface region by an amount that compensates for the differences in the phase changes caused by reflection at O1, B, O2. For the grating O1 (resp. O2), the offset 4h1 (resp. Δh2) is such as to increase the optical path length traversed by a ray R1 reflected at the first grating O1 (resp. a ray R2 reflected at the second grating O2) relative to that traversed by a ray R0 reflected at the blank surface B by an amount over which the phase of the phase of the ray R1 (resp. R2) changes by substantially Δφ1 (resp.≈Δφ2). The optical path length traversed by the ray R1 reflected from the first grating O1 is thus increased relative to that traversed by the ray R2 reflected from the second grating O2 by an amount over which the phase of the ray R1 changes by substantially Δφ1-Δφ2. Phase matching does not need to be completely accurate to achieve acceptable image quality: phase changes from gratings and the TIR will be angle and wavelength dependent which means that ‘fully’ optimal performance is obtained only for one case; for others is it less-optimal but nonetheless acceptable in terms of final image quality. In practice the system will be designed to meet conflicting requirements in accordance with normal design practice.
[0137] A plane 90 is shown, which is perpendicular to the plane of the waveguide 10c. As will be apparent, assuming the rays R1, R0, R2 are in phase with one another when they arrive at the plane 90 prior to reflection at O1, O2 and B respectively (at points P1, P0, P2 respectively), when the offsets Δh1, Δh2 substantially match Δφ1, Δφ2 respectively in the above described manner, the rays R1, R0, R2 will also be substantially in phase with one another when they arrive at the plane 90 again (at points Q1, Q0, Q2 respectively) after being reflected. This will be true for any such plane lying below the gratings O1, O2 and above the surface opposite the gratings (in this case the front of the waveguide 10c).
[0138] The resulting phase distribution of reflected beams within the waveguide 10c will thus be flat (as shown in FIG. 12B ), without any phase jumps that would cause unwanted diffractive beam spreading.
[0139] The height offsets can be effected during manufacture, whereby a substrate from which the waveguide 10c is made is processed so that the gratings O1, O2 have the desired height offsets Δh1, Δh2. The grating offset can be effected by an etching process, for example, so that the blank area is offset from the grating areas by the desired amount.
[0140] FIGS. 13A and 13B show side and plan views of a part of a second waveguide 10d in another embodiment. In this example, first and second optical elements O1 are substantially contiguous e.g. separated by a blank region of no more than Wmax≈100 μm, and in some cases no more than 50 μm. For example, the optical elements O1, O2 could be the incoupling and fold SRGs 52, 54 of FIG. 3B , with W≦Wmax. The first optical element 10d is offset relative to the second optical component 10d by an amount Δh′ which substantially matches Δφ1-Δφ2 (which is also equal substantially equal to Δh1-Δh2) i.e. the offset Δh′ is such as to increase the optical path length traversed by a ray R1 reflected at the first grating O1 relative to a ray R2 reflected at the second grating O2 by an amount over which the phase of the phase of the ray R1 changes by substantially Δφ1-Δφ2.
[0141] The expanded view at the top of FIG. 13 A shows a small blank region b (e.g. ≦Wmax) separating the gratings O1, O2. When the blank region b separating the gratings O1, O2 is sufficiently small, the improvements in image quality can generally be realized just by matching Δh′ to Δφ1-Δφ2 without having to worry about the offsets relative to the small blank region b as the effects of b may be negligible.
[0142] A plane 90 is also shown in FIG. 13A , equivalent to that of 12A. For any such plane 90, when Δh′ is thus configured, rays R1, R2 which arrive at the plane 90 (at points P1, P2) in phase with one another prior to reflection at O1, O2 will also be substantially in phase when they arrive at the plane 90 again (at points Q1, Q2) following reflection.
[0143] FIG. 14 and FIG. 15 show simulated results for example grating designs both with (FIG. 15 ) and without (FIG. 14 ) offset height. FIG. 14 corresponds to the waveguide 10a of FIGS. 10A and 10B , and FIG. 15 to the first waveguide 10c of FIG. 12A . The graphs labelled a) show a simulated phase distributions for each waveguide; the graphs labelled b) show the corresponding point spread functions (PSF), and c) the corresponding modulation transfer functions (MTF).
[0144] The PSF describes the response of an imaging system to a point source or point object. In this case, the response is measured in term of angle which represents the extent to which beam de-collimation occurs within the waveguides i.e. beam spreading due to diffraction. As will be apparent, a narrower PSF means less de-collimation, and thus a sharper image.
[0145] The MTF is a measure of the ability of an optical system to transfer various levels of detail from object to image. A theoretical MTF of 1.0 (or 100%) represents perfect contrast preservation (in practice, not achievable due to diffraction limits), whereas values less than this mean that more and more contrast is being lost—until an MTF of in practice around 0.1 (or 10%) when separate lines cannot be distinguished, peaks merge together etc.
[0146] As can be seen from FIGS. 14 and 15 , with the height offset the waveguide has both a narrower PSF and good MTF over a larger range, which is indicative of improved image quality.
[0147] It should be noted that light reflected from an optical element may experience a zero phase change i.e. the optical element may cause light to change phase upon reflection by an amount which is zero. For the avoidance of doubt, it should be noted that, in the following, when a structure is described as a causing light to change phase upon reflection by an amount, that amount may or may not be zero.
[0148] Note that the above arrangement of the light engine 13 is just an example. For example, an alternative light engine based on so-called scanning can provide a single beam, the orientation of which is fast modulated whilst simultaneously modulating its intensity and/or colour. As will be apparent, a virtual image can be simulated in this manner that is equivalent to a virtual image that would be created by collimating light of a (real) image on a display with collimating optics.
[0149] Making an optical component which includes SRGs typically involves the use of microfabrication techniques. Microfabrication refers to the fabrication of desired structures of micrometer scales and smaller. Microfabrication may involve etching of and/or deposition on a substrate, to create the desired microstructure on the substrate.
[0150] Wet etching involves using a liquid etchant to selectively dislodge parts of a substrate e.g. parts of a film deposited on a surface of a plate and/or parts of the surface of the plate itself. The etchant reacts chemically with the substrate e.g. plate/film to remove parts of the substrate e.g. plate/film that are exposed to the etchant. The selective etching may be achieved by depositing a suitable protective layer on the substrate/film that exposes only parts of the substrate e.g. plate/film to the chemical effects of etchant and protects the remaining parts from the chemical effects of the etchant. The protective layer may be formed of a photoresist or other protective mask layer.
[0151] Dry etching involves selectively exposing a substrate e.g. plate/film (e.g. using a similar photoresist mask) to a bombardment of energetic particles to dislodge parts of the substrate e.g. plate/film that are exposed to the particles (sometimes referred to as “sputtering”). An example is ion beam etching in which parts are exposed to a beam of ions. Those exposed parts may be dislodged as a result of the ions chemically reacting with those parts to dislodge them (sometimes referred to as “chemical sputtering”) and/or physically dislodging those parts due to their kinetic energy (sometimes referred to as “physical sputtering”).
[0152] In contrast to etching, deposition—such as ion-beam deposition or immersion-based deposition—involves applying material to rather than removing material from a substrate e.g. plate/film. As used herein, the term “patterning a substrate's surface” or similar encompasses all such etching of/deposition on a plate or film, and such etching of/deposition on a plate or film is said to impose structure on the substrate's surface.
[0153] Conventional techniques for making an optical component involve, for instance, first coating a to-be patterned region of a master plate's surface (desired surface region) in a chromium layer or other protective mask layer (e.g. another metallic layer). The master plate and film constitute a substrate. The mask layer is covered in a positive photoresist. Positive photoresist means photoresist which becomes developable when exposed to light i.e. photoresist which has a composition such that those parts which have been exposed to light (and only those parts) are soluble in a developing fluid used to develop the photoresist following exposure. Light which forms a desired grating pattern (grating structure)—created, for instance, using two-beam laser interference to generate light which forms a grating structure in the form of an interference pattern—is then projected onto the photoresist so that only the photoresist at the locations of the light bands is exposed. The photoresist is then developed to remove the exposed parts, leaving selective parts of the mask layer visible (i.e. revealing only selective parts) and the remaining parts covered by the unexposed photoresist at the locations of the dark fringes. The uncovered parts of the mask layer are then be removed using conventional etching techniques e.g. an initial wet etching or ion beam etching process which removes the uncovered parts of the mask but not the parts covered by the photoresist, and which does not substantially affect the plate itself. Etching of the plate itself—such as further wet etching or further ion beam etching—is then performed, to transfer the pattern from the etched mask layer to the substrate itself.
[0154] FIG. 17A shows another optical component 10′ which is similar in some respects to the optical component 10 of FIGS. 3A and 3B , but with some important differences that will now be discussed. As illustrated, the other optical component 10′ has SRGs 52′ (incoupling), 54′ (fold), 56′ (exit) similar to those of the optical component 10, with large gaps (>>100 μm) between them, including between the incoupling and fold SRGs 52′, 54′. Because of this large spacing, in manufacturing the other optical component 10′, the laser interference exposure could be done, using a positive photoresist technique along the lines of that outlined above, simply by applying shadow masks of different shapes in front of a master plate (substrate) during laser interference exposure.
[0155] This is illustrated in FIG. 17B , which shows a master plate 70′ from the side during a two-beam laser interference exposure process. The plate 70′ is coated in a chromium layer 72′, which is itself coated in photoresist 74′, which is positive photoresist. The plate 70′ and film 72′ constitute a substrate. An interference pattern is created by the interference of two laser beams 67i, 67ii. A shadow mask 69′ is used to prevent the pattern from falling outside of a desired portion (e.g. that spanned by incoupling SRG 52′) of the substrate's surface so that the only photoresist which is exposed is the parts covering the desired portion on which light bands of the interference pattern fall (exposed photoresist is shown in black and labelled 74′e in FIG. 17B ). This can then be repeated for any other portions to be patterned (e.g. for those spanned by 54′ and 56′). The positive photoresist can then be developed to remove the exposed parts 74′e, and the substrate patterned in the manner outlined above.
[0156] The shadow mask, however, causes distortion near the edges of the DOE areas. The distortion is due to light scattering, non-perfect contact of shadow mask and the finite thickness of the shadow mask (which effectively blurs the pattern near its edge). Herein, non-uniformity of a grating structure exhibited near its edges (of the type caused by such shadowing during fabrication, or similar) is referred to as “edge distortion”. Edge distortion is indicated by the label D in FIG. 17B .
[0157] When the photoresist is developed, the edge distortion becomes embodied in the developed photoresist along with the grating structure, and as a result is transferred to the surface of the plate 70′ when it comes to etching. As a result, the final optical component 10′ (which either comprises or is manufactured from the patterned plate) also exhibits corresponding edge distortion as indicated by the dotted lines labelled D around the edges of the various DOE areas in FIG. 17A .
[0158] Moreover, as well as creating edge distortion, it is difficult to position the shadow mask 69′ accurately when exposing the substrate in this manner, and therefore it would be difficult to reduce the size of the gaps between the SRGs 52′, 54′ without risking overlap between the SRGs 52′, 54′.
[0159] Returning to FIG. 3B , in contrast to the other optical component 10′ of FIG. 17A , the incoupling and fold zones 12, 14 of the optical component 10 are substantially contiguous in that they are separated by at most a narrow border zone 18 which has a width W as measured along (that is, perpendicular to) a common border 19 that divides the border zone 18. That is, the incoupling and fold zones are separated by a small distance W in width along a common border 18. Moreover, the incoupling, fold and exit SRGs 52,54, 56 of the optical component 10 are free from edge distortion of the kind described above. It has been observed that this configuration produces superior image quality to that of the other optical component 10′.
[0160] In particular, it has been observed that, when the separation W of the incoupling and fold regions 12, 14 along the common border 19 (the gap) is reduced to W≦Wmax along the length of the common border 19 (that is, provided the incoupling and fold zones are separated by no more than Wmax in width along the length of the common border 19)—where Wmax≈50 μm (micrometers)—an improvement in image quality can be obtained. In practice, the size of gap at which the improvement is observed may have some dependence on the thickness of the waveguide. For example, for a waveguide having a thickness (extent in the z direction, as it is shown in the figures) of approximately 0.6 mm or less, a dramatic improvement in image quality is observed when Wmax is approximately 50 μm or less. This particular case is illustrated in FIG. 10 , which shows curve of MTF (modular transfer function) drop as function of gap width in one case included for FIG. 18 . The increase in MTF as the gap is reduced from 50 μm is immediately evident in FIG. 18 . As is well known to persons skilled in the art, the modular transfer function (MTF) is a measure of the ability of an optical system to transfer various levels of detail from object to image. An MTF of 1.0 (or 100%) represents perfect contrast preservation, whereas values less than this mean that more and more contrast is being lost—until an MTF of 0 (or 0%), where line pairs (a line pair is a sequence of one black line and one white line) can no longer be distinguished at all. For a thicker waveguide—e.g. of thickness approximately 1 mm, an improvement is still expected for a gap size of up to 100 μm.
[0161] The common border 19 of FIG. 3B is arcuate (substantially semi-circular in this example), with the incoupling and fold regions 12, 14 having edges which are arcuate (in this case, substantially semi-circular) along the common border 19. The edge of incoupling region 12 is substantially circular overall.
[0162] The disclosure recognizes that conventional microfabrication techniques are ill suited to making the optical component 10 of FIG. 3B . In particular, existing techniques are ill-suited to making optical components exhibiting the requisite incoupling-fold zone separation W≦Wmax and which are free of edge distortion whilst still accurately maintaining the desired angular orientation relationship between the various SRGs 52, 54, and 56 described above with reference to FIG. 9B .
[0163] A microfabrication process for making an optical component will now be described with reference to FIG. 16 . The process of FIG. 16 can be used to.
[0164] As will become apparent in view of the following, the process of FIG. 16 can be used to make optical components of the type shown in FIG. 3B with the requisite small spacing between incoupling and fold zones, which are free from edge distortion, and which moreover exhibit the desired angular orientation to a high level of accuracy.
[0165] That is, this disclosure provides a novel interference lithographic method, which enables grating to be manufactured on the surface of an optical component that are spaced apart from one another by 100 micrometers or less. This is not achievable typically achievable with traditional interference lithographic methods.
[0166] FIG. 16 shows on the left-hand side a flow chart for the process and on the right-hand side, for each step of the process, plan and/or side views of an exemplary master plate 70 as appropriate to illustrate the manner in which the plate 70 is manipulated at that step. Each side view is a cross-section taken along the dash-dotted line shown in the corresponding plan view.
[0167] An upper part of the plate's surface is coated with a chromium film 72. The plate 70 and film 72 constitute a substrate, a desired surface region of which (specifically, the surface region defined by the chromium layer 72 in this example), in performing the process, is selectively etched to create incoupling and fold SRGs 52, 54. The incoupling SRG 52 is fabricated on a first portion 62 of the desired surface region (incoupling portion), and the fold SRG 54 on a second distinct (i.e. non-overlapping) and substantially contiguous portion 64 of the desired surface region (fold portion) having the reduced separation W≦Wmax along the (intended) common border 19. For the optical component 10 shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B , the desired region corresponds to the rear of the component's surface from the perspective of the wearer.
[0168] The final etched substrate constitutes an optical component which may be incorporated in a display system (e.g. the display system 2 of FIG. 1 ), or which may be for use as a production master for manufacturing further optical components e.g. a mould for moulding such components from polymer (or indeed which may be used for making such moulds), in which case the SRGs 52, 54 as fabricated on the substrate's surface are transferred to (the rear of) those components by the manufacturing e.g. moulding process.
[0169] At step S4 of FIG. 16 , the chromium layer 72 is coated in a negative photoresist film 74—that is, photoresist which becomes undevelopable when exposed to light i.e. photoresist which has a composition such that those parts which have been exposed to light (and only those parts) become substantially insoluble in a developing fluid used to develop the photoresist once exposed so that the exposed parts (and only the parts) remain post-development. This includes coating the incoupling portion 62 which is ultimately intended to be patterned with the incoupling SRG 52, as well as the fold portion 64 ultimately intended to be patterned with the fold SRG 54.
[0170] At step S6, an area substantially larger than and encompassing the incoupling portion 62 is exposed (shown in this example as a rectangle containing the desired circular area 62) to light which forms the desired incoupling grating structure (i.e. that of SRG 52). By directing two laser beams 67i, 67ii to coincide in an interference arrangement, an interference pattern which forms the desired incoupling grating structure, having a grating period d when incident on the photoresist 74, is created. The interference pattern comprises alternating light and dark bands, whereby only the parts of the photoresist on which the light bands fall are exposed (exposed photoresist is shown in black and labelled 70e in FIG. 16 ); however, in contrast to positive photoresist, it is these exposed parts 70e which become undevelopable whereas the non-exposed parts in the locations of the dark bands remain developable.
[0171] A shadow mask 69 is used to restrict the interference pattern to the larger area. The larger area is large enough not only to encompass the incoupling surface portion 62 but also such that all the edge distortion D created by the shadow mask lies outside of the incoupling portion 62 (in general, it is sufficient for the wider area to be such there is substantially no edge distortion in the vicinity of the intended common border 19, even if there is some edge distortion present elsewhere around the edge of the incoupling portion 62).
[0172] A dummy grating portion 63 is also exposed to the same (or a similar) interference pattern at the same time for reasons that will be discussed in due course.
[0173] The exposed portions 62, 63 can be practically of any shape or size but the excess exposure resulting from possible other exposures must not reach any “active part” of the desired exposure portions (i.e. in the illustration aside S6, other exposures must not overlap the circular incoupling portion 62).
[0174] As an alternative to using masks, the interference pattern could be projected over the whole of the desired surface region so that no shadowing effects are present on the desired surface region at all.
[0175] During the exposure step S6, the plate 70 is supported by a mechanical clamping or other fixing method in an laser interference exposure setup (exposure system) not shown in FIG. 16 to hold it steady relative to the exposure system (in particular, relative to the beams 67i, 67ii) whilst the exposure takes place. After step S6, the master plate 70 is unloaded from the laser interference exposure setup.
[0176] At step S8, the unloaded plate 70 is exposed to light 65 of substantially uniform intensity, but with photo mask 80 in place to expose photoresist and thus avoid photoresist development from areas outside the incoupling and dummy grating areas 62, 63. That is, photo mask 80 on the incoupling portion 62 and the dummy region 63 are used to prevent exposure of the portions 62, 63 to the uniform light 65. Thus, uniform light 65 is projected over the entirety of the desired surface region but for the incoupling and dummy portions (as these are covered by the photo mask 80) so that all of the photoresist other than that covering the incoupling and dummy portions 62, 63 becomes undevelopable throughout. It is thus the photo mask which define the portions 62, 63 (i.e. the portions 62, 63 have the same size and shape as the corresponding photomask 80 used to protect those portions), and not the shadow masks used in S6. A mask aligner is used to position the photo mask 80 accurately on correct position on the substrate. The mask aligner has components (e.g. ultraviolet-lamp, optics etc.) for generating uniform light for exposure and the mechanics for positioning the photomask 80 to the correct position.
[0177] As will be apparent, the only photoresist to retain any record of the grating structure(s) as projected at S6 is that which covers the incoupling and dummy portions—outside of those portions, all record of the grating structure(s) is intentionally destroyed. The entirely exposed photoresist outside of the incoupling and dummy portions 62, 63 includes all the parts of the photoresist that were subjected to the edge distortion D, thus completely removing any record of the edge distortion from the photoresist. Due to the nature of the process, there is virtually no distortion to the grating pattern.
[0178] At step S10, the photoresist is developed to embody the incoupling SRG grating structure by removing only those parts of that photoresist that have not been exposed to light using a developing fluid. All the exposed, undevelopable photoresist 74e is left substantially unchanged by the development of step S10. As illustrated in the figures to the right of S10 in FIG. 16 , substantially no photoresist outside of the portions 62, 63 is removed in step S10; the only removed photoresist is lines of unexposed photoresist in the incoupling and dummy portions 62, 63 corresponding to the locations of the dark bands of the interference pattern as projected on the photoresist at S6.
[0179] At step S11, a chromium etching procedure is performed to etch the chromium layer 72 (but not the plate 70 itself) with the incoupling SRG pattern, such as dry etching of the chrome hard mask 72. In etching step S11, the photoresist serves as an etching mask to restrict etching of the chromium layer 72 to the incoupling and dummy grating surface portions only, whereby structure is imposed from the photoresist to the incoupling and dummy portions 62, 63. However, the exposed, undeveloped photoresist 74e outside of the portions 62, 63 inhibits etching outside of those portions 62, 63 so that no structure is imposed on the chromium 72 outside of those portions 9 (i.e. outside of those portions, the chromium is substantially unchanged).
[0180] Once the chromium 72 has been etched thus, the exposed photoresist 74e is removed (S12) and the chromium 72 recoated with fresh, unexposed negative photoresist 74 (S13).
[0181] As indicated above, the relative orientation angle between incoupling and fold SRGs is intended to be A as defined in equation (11) above and shown in FIG. 9B (with the incoupling and exit SRGs having a relative orientation angle 2A, as per equation (12)). This can be achieved by re-loading the plate 70 in the same exposure system (previously used at S6) supported again by the same mechanical clamps or other fixing method, and rotating the plate 70 by an amount that matches A relative to the exposure system so that any subsequently projected pattern is oriented to the original incoupling SRG pattern by A (S14). By using a suitable drive mechanism, it is possible to achieve highly accurate rotation of the plate 70.
[0182] However, due to inaccuracy of mechanical stoppers, the position of the plate 70 is not accurately the same as in step S6. This is illustrated in the plan view aside step S14 of FIG. 16 , in which an angle α is shown to denote slight rotation relative to the plate's initial orientation at the previous exposure step S6 caused by unloading/reloading of the plate 70.
[0183] For this reason, prior to rotating the plate 70 at S14, the offset α between the plate position in S6 and S14 is first measured. The measurement is done using a moiré pattern 81. The moiré pattern 81 changes when the plate is rotated and this can be used to measure the angle of the plate with better than 0.001 degrees resolution.
[0184] To create the moiré pattern 81, the dummy grating portion is re-exposed to the same interference pattern it was exposed to at step S6 (or at least an interference pattern having the same angular orientation), as shown on the right-hand side of FIG. 16 . The moiré pattern is evident notwithstanding the presence of the photoresist atop the dummy grating. The moiré pattern is created as a result of the interaction between the interference pattern and the dummy grating, and when the angular alignment is better than e.g. 0.01 degrees, has a fringe spacing—typically of the order of few mm—and thus clearly visible when the offset α is about 5 thousandths of a degree, and which increases as α is reduced towards zero, becoming maximal (effectively infinite) upon α reaching zero. The fringe spacing is determined by the offset α and, conversely, can be used to measure α.
[0185] This leaves the photoresist atop the dummy grating partially exposed; as will become apparent, this is inconsequential. Notably, the dummy grating portion 63 is sufficiently offset from the fold grating portion 64 for the photoresist atop the fold grating portion to remain unexposed in creating the moiré pattern 81.
[0186] Once α has been measured, at step S16 the plate 70 is rotated from that initial orientation by an amount=A−α (thereby accounting for a in the rotation) so that the plate 70 now has an orientation A relative to its initial position at S6 to a high level of accuracy.
[0187] At step S18, an area substantially larger than and encompassing the fold portion 64 is exposed (shown in this example as a rectangle containing the desired area 64) again by directing two laser beams 67i, 67ii to coincide in an interference arrangement, leaving the parts of the photoresist on which light bands fall undevelopable in a manner equivalent to S6 (but without any additional dummy grating area being exposed). In S18, the interference pattern has a period d/(2 cos A) when incident on the photoresist. A shadow mask 69 is again used to restrict the interference pattern to this area, which is large enough not only to encompass the fold surface portion 64 but also such that all the edge distortion D created by the shadow mask lies outside of the incoupling portion 62 (or at least clear of the common border 16).
[0188] Some or all of the photoresist atop the incoupling grating will likely be exposed at S18, which is inconsequential as it has no effect on the incoupling pattern which has already been etched into the underlying chromium 72.
[0189] All other areas except fold portion 64 are then exposed (S19) to uniform light 65 with a suitable photo mask 80 in place to prevent exposure of the fold portion 64 (and only that portion) in a manner equivalent to step S8. This leaves all the photoresist covering the incoupling portion 62 (and also that covering an exit portion ultimately intended to be etched to form the exit grating 56) exposed and therefore undevelopable. The photoresist is then developed to remove only the unexposed parts (S20) in a manner equivalent to step S10, the chromium one again etched to transfer the fold SRG pattern from the photoresist to the chromium, and the photoresist removed following etching (equivalent to S11-S12). The incoupling portion is protected by the exposed and therefore undeveloped photoresist 70e, thereby preserving the incoupling grating pattern already etched into the chromium.
[0190] The use of photo mask 80 to define the incoupling and fold portions enables the location of the DOE areas to be controlled far more accurately then when simply using shadow masks to define those areas (as in the positive photoresist technique outlined above). It thus becomes possible to reduce the separation of those portions to W≦Wmax whilst still retaining separation of those portions (i.e. without the etched patterns overlapping).
[0191] Although not shown explicitly in FIG. 16 , it will be apparent that the chromium covering the grating area ultimately intended for the exit SRG 56 (vertically below the incoupling and fold SRGs 52, 54) is unaffected by the etching of both 511 and S22 as in both of those steps it is protected by undeveloped photoresist.
[0192] A similar process could be repeated to etch the desired fold grating structure into the chromium, again using a moiré pattern to achieve a highly accurate angular orientation of 2 A between the incoupling and exit grating structures. The exit grating in the present configuration is relatively far away from the input grating. Thus input grating and exit grating can be exposed to the same photoresist layer with large enough shadow masks to avoid edge distortions.
[0193] Once all three structures have been etched into the chromium, the plate 70 itself is subject to an etching procedure (e.g. ion-beam etching) in which the chromium now serves as an etching mask, whereby the grating structures are transferred from the etched chromium 72 to the plate 70 itself to form the desired incoupling, exit and fold SRGs 52, 54, 56 on the plate itself with very good angular accuracy, narrow gap W≦Wmax between SRgs 52, 54, and good quality edges free form edge distortion.
[0194] Note that the dummy grating pattern is not etched onto the plate itself as it is not desired on the final optical component.
[0195] Once the plate itself has been etched, the chromium is removed and the plate 70, can e.g. be used in a display system of the kind shown in FIG. 1 , to mould further optical components, or indeed to make such moulds.
[0196] It has been demonstrated that, using the process of FIG. 16 , substrates can be patterned, free from edge distortion, with the actual relative orientation angle between the incoupling and fold zones 14, 16 consistently being arccos(d1/(2d2)) (see equations 11, 12 above) and/or one half of the relative orientation angle between the incoupling and exit SRGs 12, 16 (see equation 13, above) to within ±one thousandth of a degree (as measured from a representative statistical population of substrates fabricated using the present techniques). However two thousandths of a degree may be still acceptable angular error in some practical contexts. It should be noted that the subject matter is not limited to the particular exit pupil expansion configuration or grating structures but applies to other configurations as well. Moreover, whilst the above is described with reference to diffraction gratings in the form of SRGs, the subject matter is not limited to diffraction gratings and encompasses any structures which cause different phase changes.
[0197] In embodiments of the various aspects set out in the Summary section, the structure of the first portion may constitute a first diffraction grating. The structure of the second portion may also a second diffraction grating.
[0198] The first grating may have a depth different from the second grating.
[0199] The first grating may have a depth which is substantially constant over the entire first portion up to the edge of the first grating. The first grating may have a depth which is substantially constant over the entire first portion up to the edge of the first grating, and the second grating has a depth which is substantially constant over the entire second portion up to the edge of the second grating.
[0200] The structure of the first portion may constitute a first diffraction grating and the structure of the second portion may be substantially non-diffractive. The first grating may have a depth which is substantially constant over the entire first portion up to the edge of the first grating.
[0201] The first and second portions may be substantially contiguous.
[0202] The first and second portions may be separated by no more than 100 micrometers in width along a common border, and optionally no more than 50 micrometers in width along the common border.
[0203] A third portion of the same surface may have a structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the third portion by a third amount different from the first amount, wherein the first and third portions are adjacent the second portion so that the second portion separates the first and third portions, and wherein the third portion is offset from the second portion by a distance which substantially matches the difference between the second amount and the third amount.
[0204] The structure of the first portion may constitute a first diffraction grating, the structure of the third portion may constitute a second diffraction grating, and the structure of the second portion may be substantially non-diffractive.
[0205] The structure of the first portion may constitute an incoupling grating via which said light is coupled into the waveguide from the display of the display system. The structure of the second portion may constitute an exit grating via which said light exits the waveguide onto the eye of the user. The structure of the second portion may constitute an intermediate grating configured to manipulate the spatial distribution of the light within the waveguide.
[0206] Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. A waveguide having a front and a rear surface, the waveguide for a display system and arranged to guide light from a light engine onto an eye of a user to make an image visible to the user, the light guided through the waveguide by reflection at the front and rear surfaces;
wherein a first portion of the front or rear surface has a structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the first portion by a first amount;
wherein a second portion of the same surface has a different structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the second portion by a second amount different from the first amount; and
wherein the first portion is offset from the second portion by a distance which substantially matches the difference between the second amount and the first amount.
2. A waveguide according to claim 1 wherein the structure of the first portion constitutes a first diffraction grating.
3. A waveguide according to claim 2 wherein the structure of the second portion constitutes a second diffraction grating.
4. A waveguide according to claim 3 wherein the first grating has a depth different from the second grating.
5. A waveguide according to claim 2 wherein the first grating has a depth which is substantially constant over the entire first portion up to the edge of the first grating.
6. A waveguide according to claim 3 wherein the first grating has a depth which is substantially constant over the entire first portion up to the edge of the first grating, and the second grating has a depth which is substantially constant over the entire second portion up to the edge of the second grating.
7. A waveguide according to claim 1 wherein the structure of the first portion constitutes a first diffraction grating and the structure of the second portion is substantially non-diffractive.
8. A waveguide according to claim 7 wherein the first grating has a depth which is substantially constant over the entire first portion up to the edge of the first grating.
9. A waveguide according to claim 1 wherein the first and second portions are substantially contiguous.
10. A waveguide according to claim 9, wherein the first and second portions are separated by no more than 100 micrometers in width along a common border, and optionally no more than 50 micrometers in width along the common border.
11. A waveguide according to claim 1 wherein a third portion of the same surface has a structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the third portion by a third amount different from the first amount, wherein the first and third portions are adjacent the second portion so that the second portion separates the first and third portions, and wherein the third portion is offset from the second portion by a distance which substantially matches the difference between the second amount and the third amount.
12. A waveguide according to claim 11 wherein the structure of the first portion constitutes a first diffraction grating, the structure of the third portion constitutes a second diffraction grating, and the structure of the second portion is substantially non-diffractive.
13. An image display system comprising:
a light engine configured to generate an image;
a waveguide having a front and a rear surface, the waveguide arranged to guide light from the light engine onto an eye of a user to make the image visible to the user, the light guided through the waveguide by reflection at the front and rear surfaces, wherein a first portion of the front or rear surface has a structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the first portion by a first amount, wherein a second portion of the same surface has a different structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the second portion by a second amount different from the first amount, and wherein the first portion is offset from the second portion by a distance which substantially matches the difference between the second amount and the first amount.
14. A display system according to claim 13 wherein the structure of the first portion constitutes an incoupling grating via which said light is coupled into the waveguide from the display.
15. A display system according to claim 13 wherein the structure of the second portion constitutes an exit grating via which said light exits the waveguide onto the eye of the user.
16. A display system according to claim 13 wherein the structure of the second portion constitutes an intermediate grating configured to manipulate the spatial distribution of the light within the waveguide.
17. A wearable image display system comprising:
a headpiece;
a light engine mounted on the headpiece and configured to generate an image;
a waveguide located forward of an eye of a wearer in use, the waveguide having a front and a rear surface, the waveguide arranged to guide light from the light engine onto the eye of the wearer to make the image visible to the wearer, the light guided through the waveguide by reflection at the front and rear surfaces, wherein a first portion of the front or rear surface has a structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the first portion by a first amount, wherein a second portion of the same surface has a different structure which causes light to change phase upon reflection from the second portion by a second amount different from the first amount, and wherein the first portion is offset from the second portion by a distance which substantially matches the difference between the second amount and the first amount.
18. A display system according to claim 17 wherein the structure of the first portion constitutes an incoupling grating via which said light is coupled into the waveguide from the display.
19. A display system according to claim 17 wherein the structure of the second portion constitutes an exit grating via which said light exits the waveguide onto the eye of the user.
20. A display system according to claim 17 wherein the structure of the second portion constitutes an intermediate grating configured to manipulate the spatial distribution of the light within the waveguide.
Patent Citations (653)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3227888(A) | 1966-01-01 | Turnbull et al. | Applicant |
| US3542453(A) | 1970-11-01 | Kantor | Applicant |
| US3836258(A) | 1974-09-01 | Courten et al. | Applicant |
| US3906528(A) | 1975-09-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US3971065(A) | 1976-07-01 | Bayer | Applicant |
| US4200395(A) | 1980-04-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US4294507(A) | 1981-10-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US4343890(A) | 1982-08-01 | Phillips et al. | Applicant |
| US4402610(A) | 1983-09-01 | Lacombat | Applicant |
| US4560249(A) | 1985-12-01 | Nishiwaki et al. | Applicant |
| US4664524(A) | 1987-05-01 | Hattori et al. | Applicant |
| US4711512(A) | 1987-12-01 | Upatnieks | Applicant |
| US4758087(A) | 1988-07-01 | Hicks, Jr. | Applicant |
| US4799752(A) | 1989-01-01 | Carome | Applicant |
| US4822145(A) | 1989-04-01 | Staelin | Applicant |
| US4860361(A) | 1989-08-01 | Sato et al. | Applicant |
| US4900129(A) | 1990-02-01 | Vanderwerf | Applicant |
| US4957351(A) | 1990-09-01 | Shioji | Applicant |
| US5004673(A) | 1991-04-01 | Vlannes | Applicant |
| US5019808(A) | 1991-05-01 | Prince et al. | Applicant |
| US5019898(A) | 1991-05-01 | Chao et al. | Applicant |
| US5106181(A) | 1992-04-01 | Rockwell, III | Applicant |
| US5114236(A) | 1992-05-01 | Matsugu et al. | Applicant |
| US5146355(A) | 1992-09-01 | Prince et al. | Applicant |
| US5162656(A) | 1992-11-01 | Matsugu et al. | Applicant |
| US5216257(A) | 1993-06-01 | Brueck et al. | Applicant |
| US5309169(A) | 1994-05-01 | Lippert | Applicant |
| US5313535(A) | 1994-05-01 | Williams | Applicant |
| US5359444(A) | 1994-10-01 | Piosenka et al. | Applicant |
| US5413884(A) | 1995-05-01 | Koch et al. | Applicant |
| US5453877(A) | 1995-09-01 | Gerbe et al. | Applicant |
| US5455458(A) | 1995-10-01 | Quon et al. | Applicant |
| US5459611(A) | 1995-10-01 | Bohn et al. | Applicant |
| US5483307(A) | 1996-01-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US5543588(A) | 1996-08-01 | Bisset et al. | Applicant |
| US5549212(A) | 1996-08-01 | Kanoh et al. | Applicant |
| US5574473(A) | 1996-11-01 | Sekiguchi | Applicant |
| US5579830(A) | 1996-12-01 | Giammaruti | Applicant |
| US5583609(A) | 1996-12-01 | Mizutani et al. | Applicant |
| US5606455(A) | 1997-02-01 | Eichenlaub | Applicant |
| US5614941(A) | 1997-03-01 | Hines | Applicant |
| US5630902(A) | 1997-05-01 | Galarneau et al. | Applicant |
| US5648643(A) | 1997-07-01 | Knowles et al. | Applicant |
| US5651414(A) | 1997-07-01 | Suzuki et al. | Applicant |
| US5673146(A) | 1997-09-01 | Kelly | Applicant |
| US5705321(A) | 1998-01-01 | Brueck et al. | Applicant |
| US5708449(A) | 1998-01-01 | Heacock et al. | Applicant |
| US5712995(A) | 1998-01-01 | Cohn | Applicant |
| US5714967(A) | 1998-02-01 | Okamura et al. | Applicant |
| US5737171(A) | 1998-04-01 | Buller et al. | Applicant |
| US5751476(A) | 1998-05-01 | Matsui et al. | Applicant |
| US5771042(A) | 1998-06-01 | Santos-Gomez | Applicant |
| US5771320(A) | 1998-06-01 | Stone | Applicant |
| US5772903(A) | 1998-06-01 | Hirsch | Applicant |
| US5856842(A) | 1999-01-01 | Tedesco | Applicant |
| US5861931(A) | 1999-01-01 | Gillian et al. | Applicant |
| US5880725(A) | 1999-03-01 | Southgate | Applicant |
| US5886822(A) | 1999-03-01 | Spitzer | Applicant |
| US5940149(A) | 1999-08-01 | Vanderwerf | Applicant |
| US5959664(A) | 1999-09-01 | Woodgate | Applicant |
| US5982553(A) | 1999-11-01 | Bloom et al. | Applicant |
| US5991087(A) | 1999-11-01 | Rallison | Applicant |
| US6101008(A) | 2000-08-01 | Popovich | Applicant |
| US6144439(A) | 2000-11-01 | Carollo | Applicant |
| US6160667(A) | 2000-12-01 | Smoot | Applicant |
| US6169829(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Laming et al. | Applicant |
| US6181852(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Adams et al. | Applicant |
| US6200711(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Kurihara et al. | Applicant |
| US6226178(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Broder et al. | Applicant |
| US6239502(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Grewe et al. | Applicant |
| US6271808(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Corbin | Applicant |
| US6307142(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Allen et al. | Applicant |
| US6323949(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Lading et al. | Applicant |
| US6323970(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Popovich | Applicant |
| US6377401(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Bartlett | Applicant |
| US6411512(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Mankaruse et al. | Applicant |
| US6417892(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Sharp et al. | Applicant |
| US6446442(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Batchelor et al. | Applicant |
| US6466198(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Feinstein | Applicant |
| US6470289(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Peters et al. | Applicant |
| US6481851(B1) | 2002-11-01 | McNelley et al. | Applicant |
| US6483580(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Xu et al. | Applicant |
| US6496218(B2) | 2002-12-01 | Takigawa et al. | Applicant |
| US6529331(B2) | 2003-03-01 | Massof et al. | Applicant |
| US6542307(B2) | 2003-04-01 | Gleckman et al. | Applicant |
| US6545650(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Yamada et al. | Applicant |
| US6553165(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Temkin et al. | Applicant |
| US6554428(B2) | 2003-04-01 | Fergason et al. | Applicant |
| US6577411(B1) | 2003-06-01 | David | Applicant |
| US6580529(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Amitai et al. | Applicant |
| US6606152(B2) | 2003-08-01 | Littau | Applicant |
| US6621702(B2) | 2003-09-01 | Elias et al. | Applicant |
| US6631755(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Kung et al. | Applicant |
| US6635999(B2) | 2003-10-01 | Belliveau | Applicant |
| US6639201(B2) | 2003-10-01 | Almogy et al. | Applicant |
| US6661436(B2) | 2003-12-01 | Barksdale et al. | Applicant |
| US6735499(B2) | 2004-05-01 | Ohki et al. | Applicant |
| US6753828(B2) | 2004-06-01 | Tuceryan et al. | Applicant |
| US6775460(B2) | 2004-08-01 | Steiner et al. | Applicant |
| US6792328(B2) | 2004-09-01 | Laughery et al. | Applicant |
| US6804115(B2) | 2004-10-01 | Lai | Applicant |
| US6809925(B2) | 2004-10-01 | Belady et al. | Applicant |
| US6819426(B2) | 2004-11-01 | Sezginer et al. | Applicant |
| US6825987(B2) | 2004-11-01 | Repetto et al. | Applicant |
| US6829093(B1) | 2004-12-01 | Nakai | Applicant |
| US6829095(B2) | 2004-12-01 | Amitai | Applicant |
| US6867753(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Chinthammit et al. | Applicant |
| US6888613(B2) | 2005-05-01 | Robins et al. | Applicant |
| US6889755(B2) | 2005-05-01 | Zuo et al. | Applicant |
| US6906901(B1) | 2005-06-01 | Liu | Applicant |
| US6916584(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Sreenivasan et al. | Applicant |
| US6919867(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Sauer | Applicant |
| US6947020(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Kiser et al. | Applicant |
| US6964731(B1) | 2005-11-01 | Krisko et al. | Applicant |
| US6971443(B2) | 2005-12-01 | Kung et al. | Applicant |
| US6974714(B2) | 2005-12-01 | Uno | Applicant |
| US6992738(B2) | 2006-01-01 | Ishihara et al. | Applicant |
| US6997241(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Chou et al. | Applicant |
| US7006215(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Hoff et al. | Applicant |
| US7015876(B1) | 2006-03-01 | Miller | Applicant |
| US7031894(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Niu et al. | Applicant |
| US7048385(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Beeson et al. | Applicant |
| US7061624(B2) | 2006-06-01 | Ishizuka | Applicant |
| US7069975(B1) | 2006-07-01 | Haws et al. | Applicant |
| US7099005(B1) | 2006-08-01 | Fabrikant et al. | Applicant |
| US7113605(B2) | 2006-09-01 | Rui et al. | Applicant |
| US7116555(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Kamath et al. | Applicant |
| US7151635(B2) | 2006-12-01 | Bidnyk et al. | Applicant |
| US7181699(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Morrow et al. | Applicant |
| US7184615(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Levola | Applicant |
| US7189362(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Nordin et al. | Applicant |
| US7191820(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Chou et al. | Applicant |
| US7193584(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US7196758(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Crawford et al. | Applicant |
| US7206107(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Levola | Applicant |
| US7212709(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Hosoi | Applicant |
| US7212723(B2) | 2007-05-01 | McLeod et al. | Applicant |
| US7250930(B2) | 2007-07-01 | Hoffman et al. | Applicant |
| US7253445(B2) | 2007-08-01 | Heremans et al. | Applicant |
| US7261453(B2) | 2007-08-01 | Morejon et al. | Applicant |
| US7261827(B2) | 2007-08-01 | Ootsu et al. | Applicant |
| US7271795(B2) | 2007-09-01 | Bradski | Applicant |
| US7277282(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Tate | Applicant |
| US7301587(B2) | 2007-11-01 | Uehara et al. | Applicant |
| US7324754(B2) | 2008-01-01 | Kobayashi | Examiner |
| US7333690(B1) | 2008-02-01 | Peale et al. | Applicant |
| US7337018(B2) | 2008-02-01 | Espinoza-Ibarra et al. | Applicant |
| US7359420(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Shchegrov et al. | Applicant |
| US7365734(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Fateh et al. | Applicant |
| US7369101(B2) | 2008-05-01 | Sauer et al. | Applicant |
| US7372565(B1) | 2008-05-01 | Holden et al. | Applicant |
| US7376852(B2) | 2008-05-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US7396133(B2) | 2008-07-01 | Burnett et al. | Applicant |
| US7399420(B2) | 2008-07-01 | Paek et al. | Applicant |
| US7412306(B2) | 2008-08-01 | Katoh et al. | Applicant |
| US7416017(B2) | 2008-08-01 | Haws et al. | Applicant |
| US7417617(B2) | 2008-08-01 | Eichenlaub | Applicant |
| US7418170(B2) | 2008-08-01 | Mukawa et al. | Applicant |
| US7428001(B2) | 2008-09-01 | Schowengerdt et al. | Applicant |
| US7430349(B2) | 2008-09-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US7430355(B2) | 2008-09-01 | Heikenfeld et al. | Applicant |
| US7437678(B2) | 2008-10-01 | Awada et al. | Applicant |
| US7455102(B2) | 2008-11-01 | Cheng | Applicant |
| US7505269(B1) | 2009-03-01 | Cosley et al. | Applicant |
| US7513627(B2) | 2009-04-01 | Larson et al. | Applicant |
| US7515143(B2) | 2009-04-01 | Keam et al. | Applicant |
| US7532227(B2) | 2009-05-01 | Nakajima et al. | Applicant |
| US7539371(B2) | 2009-05-01 | Martinelli et al. | Applicant |
| US7542665(B2) | 2009-06-01 | Lei | Applicant |
| US7551814(B1) | 2009-06-01 | Smits | Applicant |
| US7576916(B2) | 2009-08-01 | Amitai | Applicant |
| US7583327(B2) | 2009-09-01 | Takatani | Applicant |
| US7607111(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Vaananen et al. | Applicant |
| US7612882(B2) | 2009-11-01 | Wu et al. | Applicant |
| US7619895(B1) | 2009-11-01 | Wertz et al. | Applicant |
| US7631687(B2) | 2009-12-01 | Yang | Applicant |
| US7646606(B2) | 2010-01-01 | Rytka et al. | Applicant |
| US7646950(B2) | 2010-01-01 | Park | Examiner |
| US7649594(B2) | 2010-01-01 | Kim et al. | Applicant |
| US7656912(B2) | 2010-02-01 | Brueck et al. | Applicant |
| US7660500(B2) | 2010-02-01 | Konttinen et al. | Applicant |
| US7679641(B2) | 2010-03-01 | Lipton et al. | Applicant |
| US7693292(B1) | 2010-04-01 | Gross et al. | Applicant |
| US7701716(B2) | 2010-04-01 | Blanco, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US7706785(B2) | 2010-04-01 | Lei et al. | Applicant |
| US7716003(B1) | 2010-05-01 | Wack et al. | Applicant |
| US7719769(B2) | 2010-05-01 | Sugihara et al. | Applicant |
| US7728933(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Kim et al. | Applicant |
| US7764413(B2) | 2010-07-01 | Levola | Applicant |
| US7768534(B2) | 2010-08-01 | Pentenrieder et al. | Applicant |
| US7777944(B2) | 2010-08-01 | Ho et al. | Applicant |
| US7788474(B2) | 2010-08-01 | Switzer et al. | Applicant |
| US7817104(B2) | 2010-10-01 | Ryu et al. | Applicant |
| US7826508(B2) | 2010-11-01 | Reid et al. | Applicant |
| US7832885(B2) | 2010-11-01 | Hsiao et al. | Applicant |
| US7843691(B2) | 2010-11-01 | Reichert et al. | Applicant |
| US7871811(B2) | 2011-01-01 | Fang et al. | Applicant |
| US7890882(B1) | 2011-02-01 | Nelson | Applicant |
| US7894613(B1) | 2011-02-01 | Ong et al. | Applicant |
| US7903409(B2) | 2011-03-01 | Patel et al. | Applicant |
| US7904832(B2) | 2011-03-01 | Ubillos | Applicant |
| US7909958(B2) | 2011-03-01 | Washburn et al. | Applicant |
| US7941231(B1) | 2011-05-01 | Dunn | Applicant |
| US7949214(B2) | 2011-05-01 | DeJong | Examiner |
| US7986462(B2) | 2011-07-01 | Kobayashi et al. | Applicant |
| US8004621(B2) | 2011-08-01 | Woodgate et al. | Applicant |
| US8014644(B2) | 2011-09-01 | Morimoto et al. | Applicant |
| US8033709(B2) | 2011-10-01 | Kao et al. | Applicant |
| US8035896(B2) | 2011-10-01 | Taira et al. | Applicant |
| US8046616(B2) | 2011-10-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US8061411(B2) | 2011-11-01 | Xu et al. | Applicant |
| US8085948(B2) | 2011-12-01 | Thomas et al. | Applicant |
| US8092064(B2) | 2012-01-01 | Erchak et al. | Applicant |
| US8125579(B2) | 2012-02-01 | Khan et al. | Applicant |
| US8128800(B2) | 2012-03-01 | Seo et al. | Applicant |
| US8139504(B2) | 2012-03-01 | Mankins et al. | Applicant |
| US8150893(B2) | 2012-04-01 | Bohannon et al. | Applicant |
| US8160411(B2) | 2012-04-01 | Levola et al. | Applicant |
| US8162524(B2) | 2012-04-01 | Van Ostrand et al. | Applicant |
| US8165988(B2) | 2012-04-01 | Shau et al. | Applicant |
| US8176436(B2) | 2012-05-01 | Arend et al. | Applicant |
| US8189263(B1) | 2012-05-01 | Wang | Examiner |
| US8195220(B2) | 2012-06-01 | Kim et al. | Applicant |
| US8233204(B1) | 2012-07-01 | Robbins | Examiner |
| US8233273(B2) | 2012-07-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US8244667(B1) | 2012-08-01 | Weinberger et al. | Applicant |
| US8246170(B2) | 2012-08-01 | Yamamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US8274614(B2) | 2012-09-01 | Yokote et al. | Applicant |
| US8300614(B2) | 2012-10-01 | Ankaiah et al. | Applicant |
| US8320032(B2) | 2012-11-01 | Levola | Examiner |
| US8332402(B2) | 2012-12-01 | Forstall et al. | Applicant |
| US8358400(B2) | 2013-01-01 | Escuti | Applicant |
| US8384999(B1) | 2013-02-01 | Crosby et al. | Applicant |
| US8392035(B2) | 2013-03-01 | Patel et al. | Applicant |
| US8395898(B1) | 2013-03-01 | Chamseddine et al. | Applicant |
| US8418083(B1) | 2013-04-01 | Lundy et al. | Applicant |
| US8434019(B2) | 2013-04-01 | Nelson | Applicant |
| US8446340(B2) | 2013-05-01 | Aharoni | Applicant |
| US8466953(B2) | 2013-06-01 | Levola | Applicant |
| US8472119(B1) | 2013-06-01 | Kelly | Applicant |
| US8482920(B2) | 2013-07-01 | Tissot et al. | Applicant |
| US8571539(B1) | 2013-10-01 | Ranganathan et al. | Applicant |
| US8576143(B1) | 2013-11-01 | Kelly | Applicant |
| US8589341(B2) | 2013-11-01 | Golde et al. | Applicant |
| US8593734(B2) | 2013-11-01 | Laakkonen | Examiner |
| US8594702(B2) | 2013-11-01 | Naaman et al. | Applicant |
| US8605700(B2) | 2013-12-01 | Gurin | Applicant |
| US8611014(B2) | 2013-12-01 | Valera et al. | Applicant |
| US8627228(B2) | 2014-01-01 | Yosef et al. | Applicant |
| US8629815(B2) | 2014-01-01 | Brin et al. | Applicant |
| US8634139(B1) | 2014-01-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US8638498(B2) | 2014-01-01 | Bohn et al. | Applicant |
| US8645871(B2) | 2014-02-01 | Fong et al. | Applicant |
| US8666212(B1) | 2014-03-01 | Amirparviz | Applicant |
| US8693500(B2) | 2014-04-01 | Ludwig et al. | Applicant |
| US8698845(B2) | 2014-04-01 | Lemay | Applicant |
| US8700931(B2) | 2014-04-01 | Gudlavenkatasiva et al. | Applicant |
| US8712598(B2) | 2014-04-01 | Dighde et al. | Applicant |
| US8717676(B2) | 2014-05-01 | Rinko | Examiner |
| US8754831(B2) | 2014-06-01 | Kollin et al. | Applicant |
| US8796012(B2) | 2014-08-01 | Sinclair et al. | Applicant |
| US8810600(B2) | 2014-08-01 | Bohn et al. | Applicant |
| US8817350(B1) | 2014-08-01 | Robbins et al. | Applicant |
| US8823531(B1) | 2014-09-01 | McCleary et al. | Applicant |
| US8885997(B2) | 2014-11-01 | Nguyen | Examiner |
| US8909384(B1) | 2014-12-01 | Beitelmal et al. | Applicant |
| US8917453(B2) | 2014-12-01 | Bohn | Applicant |
| US8934235(B2) | 2015-01-01 | Rubenstein et al. | Applicant |
| US8941683(B2) | 2015-01-01 | Son et al. | Applicant |
| US8989535(B2) | 2015-03-01 | Robbins | Applicant |
| US9304235(B2) | 2016-04-01 | Sainiemi et al. | Applicant |
| US9423360(B1) | 2016-08-01 | Kostamo et al. | Applicant |
| US9429692(B1) | 2016-08-01 | Saarikko et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0043208(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Furness, III et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0035455(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Niu et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0038196(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0041735(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Cai et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0044152(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Abbott et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0044162(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Sawatari | Applicant |
| US2002/0063820(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Broer et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0097558(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Stone et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0138772(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Crawford et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0171939(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Song | Applicant |
| US2002/0180659(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Takahashi | Applicant |
| US2003/0006364(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Katzir et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0023889(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Hofstee et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0137706(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Rmanujam et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0179453(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Mori et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0214728(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Olczak | Applicant |
| US2004/0011503(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Kung et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0042724(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Gombert et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0085649(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Repetto et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0108971(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Waldern et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0109234(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Levola | Applicant |
| US2004/0135209(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Hsieh et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0151466(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Crossman-Bosworth et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0176928(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US2004/0267990(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Lin | Applicant |
| US2005/0089328(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Nishiki | Examiner |
| US2005/0100272(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Gilman | Applicant |
| US2005/0174737(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Meir | Applicant |
| US2005/0207120(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Tseng et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0243107(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Haim et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0248705(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0285878(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Singh et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0018025(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Sharon et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0032616(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Yang | Applicant |
| US2006/0038881(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Starkweather et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0054787(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0072206(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Tsuyuki et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0118280(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Liu | Applicant |
| US2006/0126181(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Levola | Applicant |
| US2006/0129951(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Vaananen et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0132806(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Shchegrov et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0132914(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Weiss | Examiner |
| US2006/0139447(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Unkrich | Applicant |
| US2006/0152646(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Schrader | Applicant |
| US2006/0164382(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Kulas et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0183331(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Hofmann | Applicant |
| US2006/0196643(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Hata et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0221448(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Nivon et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0228073(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Mukawa | Examiner |
| US2006/0249765(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Hsieh | Applicant |
| US2006/0250541(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Huck | Applicant |
| US2007/0002412(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Aihara | Applicant |
| US2007/0008456(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Lesage et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0023703(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Sunaoshi et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0027591(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Goldenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0041684(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Popovich et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0097019(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Wynne-Powell et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0147673(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Crandall | Applicant |
| US2007/0153395(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Repetto et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0171328(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Freeman | Examiner |
| US2007/0177260(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Kuppenheimer et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0214180(A1) | 2007-09-01 | Crawford | Applicant |
| US2007/0236959(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Tolbert | Applicant |
| US2007/0284093(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Bhatti et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0008076(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Raguin et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0014534(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Barwicz et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0025350(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Arbore et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0043100(A1) | 2008-02-01 | Sobel et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0043425(A1) | 2008-02-01 | Hebert et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0088603(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Eliasson et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0088624(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Long et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0106677(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Kuan et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0117341(A1) | 2008-05-01 | McGrew | Applicant |
| US2008/0141681(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Arnold | Applicant |
| US2008/0150913(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Bell et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0174735(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Quach et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0232680(A1) | 2008-09-01 | Berestov et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0248852(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Rasmussen | Applicant |
| US2008/0285140(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Amitai | Applicant |
| US2008/0297535(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Reinig | Applicant |
| US2008/0303918(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Keithley | Applicant |
| US2008/0311386(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Wendt | Applicant |
| US2009/0002939(A1) | 2009-01-01 | Baugh et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0015742(A1) | 2009-01-01 | Liao et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0021908(A1) | 2009-01-01 | Patel et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0051283(A1) | 2009-02-01 | Cok et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0059376(A1) | 2009-03-01 | Hayakawa | Applicant |
| US2009/0084525(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Satou et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0092261(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Bard | Applicant |
| US2009/0097127(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Amitai | Applicant |
| US2009/0128449(A1) | 2009-05-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0128901(A1) | 2009-05-01 | Tilleman et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0180250(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Holling et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0188610(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Yamamoto | Applicant |
| US2009/0189974(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Deering | Applicant |
| US2009/0190003(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Park et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0195756(A1) | 2009-08-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0199128(A1) | 2009-08-01 | Matthews et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0222147(A1) | 2009-09-01 | Nakashima et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0224416(A1) | 2009-09-01 | Laakkonen et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0235203(A1) | 2009-09-01 | Iizuka | Applicant |
| US2009/0244413(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Ishikawa et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0246707(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0256837(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Deb et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0262419(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Robinson et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0303599(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Levola | Applicant |
| US2010/0002989(A1) | 2010-01-01 | Tokushima | Applicant |
| US2010/0021108(A1) | 2010-01-01 | Kang et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0053151(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Marti et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0060551(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Sugiyama et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0061078(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Kim | Applicant |
| US2010/0074291(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Nakamura | Applicant |
| US2010/0079865(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Saarikko | Examiner |
| US2010/0084674(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Paetzold et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0096617(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Shanks | Applicant |
| US2010/0103078(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Mukawa et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0134534(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Seesselberg | Examiner |
| US2010/0141905(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Burke | Applicant |
| US2010/0149073(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Chaum et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0188353(A1) | 2010-07-01 | Yoon et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0200736(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Laycock et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0201953(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Freeman et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0202725(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Popovich | Examiner |
| US2010/0211575(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Collins et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0213467(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0220439(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Qin | Applicant |
| US2010/0229853(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Vandal et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0238270(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Bjelkhagen et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0245387(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Bachelder et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0259889(A1) | 2010-10-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0271467(A1) | 2010-10-01 | Akeley | Applicant |
| US2010/0277421(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Charlier et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0277439(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Charlier et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0277779(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Futterer et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0277803(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Pockett et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0278484(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Scheerlinck et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0284085(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Laakkonen | Applicant |
| US2010/0300654(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US2010/0309687(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Sampsell et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0315781(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Agostini | Applicant |
| US2010/0317132(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Rogers et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0321609(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Qi et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0321781(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Levola | Applicant |
| US2010/0328351(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Tan | Applicant |
| US2011/0012814(A1) | 2011-01-01 | Tanaka | Applicant |
| US2011/0021251(A1) | 2011-01-01 | Lindén | Applicant |
| US2011/0025605(A1) | 2011-02-01 | Kwitek | Applicant |
| US2011/0026128(A1) | 2011-02-01 | Baker et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0032482(A1) | 2011-02-01 | Agurok | Applicant |
| US2011/0038049(A1) | 2011-02-01 | Vallius et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0050547(A1) | 2011-03-01 | Mukawa | Applicant |
| US2011/0050655(A1) | 2011-03-01 | Mukawa | Applicant |
| US2011/0063795(A1) | 2011-03-01 | Yeh et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0075442(A1) | 2011-03-01 | Chiang | Applicant |
| US2011/0084893(A1) | 2011-04-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0090343(A1) | 2011-04-01 | Alt et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0091156(A1) | 2011-04-01 | Laughlin | Applicant |
| US2011/0096401(A1) | 2011-04-01 | Levola | Applicant |
| US2011/0099512(A1) | 2011-04-01 | Jeong | Applicant |
| US2011/0114823(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Katzir et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0115340(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US2011/0127024(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Patel et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0134017(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Burke | Applicant |
| US2011/0134645(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Hitchcock et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0141388(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Park et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0148931(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Kim | Applicant |
| US2011/0163986(A1) | 2011-07-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0175930(A1) | 2011-07-01 | Hwang et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0194029(A1) | 2011-08-01 | Herrmann et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0205251(A1) | 2011-08-01 | Auld | Applicant |
| US2011/0210946(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Goertz et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0214082(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Osterhout et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0215349(A1) | 2011-09-01 | An et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0221658(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Haddick et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0221659(A1) | 2011-09-01 | King et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0222236(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Luo et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0227820(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Haddick et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0227913(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Hyndman | Applicant |
| US2011/0235179(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Simmonds | Applicant |
| US2011/0242145(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Nishimura et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0242392(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Chiang | Applicant |
| US2011/0242757(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Tracy et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0248904(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Miyawaki et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0248958(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Gruhlke et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0267799(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Epstein et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0283223(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Vaittinen et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0295913(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Enbutsu | Applicant |
| US2011/0299044(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Yeh et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0304640(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Noge | Applicant |
| US2011/0309378(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Lau et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0310232(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Wilson et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0310312(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Yokote et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0013651(A1) | 2012-01-01 | Trayner et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0019434(A1) | 2012-01-01 | Kuhlman et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0026161(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0030616(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Howes et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0033306(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Valera et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0038629(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0041721(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Chen | Applicant |
| US2012/0044573(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Simmonds et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0050144(A1) | 2012-03-01 | Morlock et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0052934(A1) | 2012-03-01 | Maharbiz et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0062998(A1) | 2012-03-01 | Schultz et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0069413(A1) | 2012-03-01 | Schultz | Applicant |
| US2012/0084710(A1) | 2012-04-01 | Sirpal et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0106170(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Matthews et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0111544(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Senatori | Applicant |
| US2012/0113092(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Bar-Zeev et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0120493(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Simmonds et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0134623(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Boudreau et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0144331(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Tolonen et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0157114(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Alameh et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0162764(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Shimizu | Applicant |
| US2012/0176322(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Karmi et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0176474(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Border | Applicant |
| US2012/0182687(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Dighde et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0188205(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Jansson et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0195553(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Hasegawa et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0200495(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Johansson | Applicant |
| US2012/0206589(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Crandall | Applicant |
| US2012/0206880(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Andres et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0218301(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Miller | Applicant |
| US2012/0227006(A1) | 2012-09-01 | Amm | Applicant |
| US2012/0235885(A1) | 2012-09-01 | Miller et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0242561(A1) | 2012-09-01 | Sugihara | Applicant |
| US2012/0256856(A1) | 2012-10-01 | Suzuki et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0256963(A1) | 2012-10-01 | Suzuki et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0262657(A1) | 2012-10-01 | Nakanishi et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0287381(A1) | 2012-11-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0292535(A1) | 2012-11-01 | Choi et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0304092(A1) | 2012-11-01 | Jarrett et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0304108(A1) | 2012-11-01 | Jarrett et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0000871(A1) | 2013-01-01 | Olson et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0033485(A1) | 2013-02-01 | Kollin et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0081779(A1) | 2013-04-01 | Liao et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0093741(A1) | 2013-04-01 | Akimoto et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0106674(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Wheeler et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0148864(A1) | 2013-06-01 | Dolson et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0162673(A1) | 2013-06-01 | Bohn | Applicant |
| US2013/0163089(A1) | 2013-06-01 | Bohn | Applicant |
| US2013/0170031(A1) | 2013-07-01 | Bohn et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0170802(A1) | 2013-07-01 | Pitwon | Applicant |
| US2013/0186596(A1) | 2013-07-01 | Rubenstein | Applicant |
| US2013/0186598(A1) | 2013-07-01 | Rubenstein | Applicant |
| US2013/0187943(A1) | 2013-07-01 | Bohn et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0198176(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Kim | Applicant |
| US2013/0207964(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Fleck | Applicant |
| US2013/0208003(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Bohn | Applicant |
| US2013/0208362(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Bohn | Applicant |
| US2013/0208482(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Fleck | Applicant |
| US2013/0215081(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Levin et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0226931(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Hazel et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0242056(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Fleck | Applicant |
| US2013/0242555(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Mukawa | Applicant |
| US2013/0250431(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Robbins et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0252628(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Kuehnel | Applicant |
| US2013/0254412(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Menezes et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0257848(A1) | 2013-10-01 | Westerinen et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0258701(A1) | 2013-10-01 | Westerinen et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0267309(A1) | 2013-10-01 | Robbins | Applicant |
| US2013/0294030(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0305184(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Kim et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0307875(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US2013/0314789(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Saarikko et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0314793(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Robbins | Applicant |
| US2013/0322810(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Robbins | Applicant |
| US2013/0332159(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Federighi et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0335671(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Fleck | Applicant |
| US2013/0339446(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Balassanian et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0342674(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Dixon | Applicant |
| US2013/0346725(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Lomet et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0010265(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Peng | Applicant |
| US2014/0022265(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Canan | Applicant |
| US2014/0041827(A1) | 2014-02-01 | Giaimo | Applicant |
| US2014/0059139(A1) | 2014-02-01 | Filev et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0063367(A1) | 2014-03-01 | Yang et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0078130(A1) | 2014-03-01 | Uchino et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0089833(A1) | 2014-03-01 | Hwang et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0094973(A1) | 2014-04-01 | Giaimo et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0098671(A1) | 2014-04-01 | Raleigh et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0104665(A1) | 2014-04-01 | Popovich et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0104685(A1) | 2014-04-01 | Bohn | Applicant |
| US2014/0111865(A1) | 2014-04-01 | Kobayashi | Applicant |
| US2014/0116982(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Schellenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0140653(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0140654(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0143247(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Rathnavelu et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0143351(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Deng | Applicant |
| US2014/0176528(A1) | 2014-06-01 | Robbins | Applicant |
| US2014/0184699(A1) | 2014-07-01 | Ito et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0204455(A1) | 2014-07-01 | Popovich | Applicant |
| US2014/0240842(A1) | 2014-08-01 | Nguyen et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0300966(A1) | 2014-10-01 | Travers et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0314374(A1) | 2014-10-01 | Fattal et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0086163(A1) | 2015-03-01 | Valera | Examiner |
| US2015/0168731(A1) | 2015-06-01 | Robbins | Applicant |
| US2016/0033697(A1) | 2016-02-01 | Sainiemi et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0033784(A1) | 2016-02-01 | Levola et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0035539(A1) | 2016-02-01 | Sainiemi et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0231257(A1) | 2016-08-01 | Kostamo et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0231477(A1) | 2016-08-01 | Saarikko et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0231478(A1) | 2016-08-01 | Kostamo | Applicant |
| US2016/0231566(A1) | 2016-08-01 | Levola et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0231567(A1) | 2016-08-01 | Saarikko | Applicant |
| US2016/0231569(A1) | 2016-08-01 | Levola | Applicant |
| US2016/0231570(A1) | 2016-08-01 | Levola et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0234485(A1) | 2016-08-01 | Robbins et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0283618(A1) | 2016-09-01 | Levola et al. | Applicant |
| CN1440513 | 2003-09-01 | Applicant | |
| CN101029968 | 2007-09-01 | Applicant | |
| CN101105512 | 2008-01-01 | Applicant | |
| CN102004315 | 2011-04-01 | Applicant | |
| EP977022 | 2000-02-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1494109 | 2005-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1847924 | 2007-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2065750 | 2009-06-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2083310 | 2009-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2112547 | 2009-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2144177 | 2010-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2216678 | 2010-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2241926 | 2010-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2662761 | 2013-11-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2752691 | 2014-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2887121 | 2015-06-01 | Applicant | |
| FR2942811 | 2010-09-01 | Applicant | |
| GB2500631 | 2013-10-01 | Applicant | |
| JPS5557807 | 1980-04-01 | Applicant | |
| JPS57109618 | 1982-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JPS599920 | 1984-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JPS5962888 | 1984-04-01 | Applicant | |
| JPS60188911 | 1985-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JPS6252506 | 1987-03-01 | Applicant | |
| JPS62278508 | 1987-12-01 | Applicant | |
| JPH03180801 | 1991-08-01 | Applicant | |
| JPH0422358 | 1992-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JPH06310806 | 1994-11-01 | Applicant | |
| JP7311303 | 1995-11-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2000347037 | 2000-12-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2001078234 | 2001-03-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2008017135 | 2008-01-01 | Applicant | |
| KR20070001771 | 2007-01-01 | Applicant | |
| KR20090076539 | 2009-07-01 | Applicant | |
| KR20090084316 | 2009-08-01 | Applicant | |
| KR20110070087 | 2011-06-01 | Applicant | |
| KR20120023458 | 2012-03-01 | Applicant | |
| TW201407202 | 2014-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9418595 | 1994-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9952002 | 1999-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-0133282 | 2001-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-0177915 | 2001-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-0195027 | 2001-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03090611 | 2003-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2006054056 | 2006-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2006064334 | 2006-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2007052265 | 2007-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2007057500 | 2007-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2008021504 | 2008-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2008081070 | 2008-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2009029826 | 2009-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2009077601 | 2009-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2009127849 | 2009-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2010092409 | 2010-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2010125337 | 2010-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2011003381 | 2011-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2011051660 | 2011-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2011051660 | 2011-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2011090455 | 2011-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2011110728 | 2011-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2011131978 | 2011-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2012172295 | 2012-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2012177811 | 2012-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2013033274 | 2013-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2013058769 | 2013-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2013164665 | 2013-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2014051920 | 2014-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2014085502 | 2014-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2014088343 | 2014-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2014111163 | 2014-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2014130383 | 2014-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2015091669 | 2015-06-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (259)
- “Adobe Audition / Customizing Workspaces”, Retrieved from: <http://help.adobe.com/en—US/audition/cs/using/WS9FA7B8D7-5991-4e05-B13C-4C85DAF1F051.html> Jul. 5, 2014, May 18, 2011, 6 Pages.Applicant
- “Always Connected”, Available at: http://www.samsung.com/global/microsite/galaxycamera/nx/, Jun. 24, 2013, 5 pages.Applicant
- “Controlling Your Desktop's Power Management”, Retrieved from: <http://www.vorkon.de/SU1210.001/drittanbieter/Dokumentation/openSUSE—11.2/manual/sec.gnomeuser.start.power—mgmt.html> Jul. 7, 2014, 6 Pages.Applicant
- “Display Control”, Retrieved from: <http://www.portrait.com/technology/display-control.html> Jul. 4, 2014, Jun. 24, 2013, 5 Pages.Applicant
- “Manage Multiple Windows”, Retrieved from: <http://windows.microsoft.com/en-hk/windows/manage-multiple-windows#1TC=windows-7> Jul. 8, 2014, 4 Pages.Applicant
- “Merge Operator”, Retrieved on: Jun. 3, 2014, Available at: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Merge-Operator, 10 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/774,875, Sep. 16, 2015, 8 pages.Applicant
- “Organize Your Desktop Workspace for More Comfort with Window Space”, Retrieved From: <http://www.ntwind.com/software/windowspace.html> Jul. 4, 2014, Sep. 19, 2008, 5 Pages.Applicant
- “SizeUp the Missing Window Manager”, Retrieved From: <https://www.irradiatedsoftware.com/sizeup/> Jul. 4, 2014, Jan. 17, 2013, 4 Pages.Applicant
- “Using Flickr to Organize a Collection of Images”, Available at: http://www.jiscdigitalmedia.ac.uk/guide/using-flickr-to-organise-a-collection-of-images, Apr. 2, 2013, 17 pages.Applicant
- “Window Magnet”, Retrieved From: <http://magnet.crowdcafe.com/> Jul. 4, 2014, Jun. 23, 2011, 2 Pages.Applicant
- “Windows 7: Display Reminder When Click on Shutdown?”, Retrieved From: <http://www.sevenforums.com/customization/118688-display-reminder-when-click-shutdown.html> Jul. 8, 2014, Oct. 18, 2010, 5 Pages.Applicant
- “Working with Windows”, Retrieved from: <http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/working-with-windows#ITC=windows-7> Jul. 4, 2014, 10 Pages.Applicant
- Ashraf,“Winsplit Revolution: Tile, Resize, and Position Windows for Efficient Use of Your Screen”, Retrieved from: <http://dottech.org/11240/winsplit-revolution-tile-resize-and-position-windows-for-efficient-use-of-your-screen/> Jul. 8, 2014, Dec. 18, 2011, 4 Pages.Applicant
- Callaghan,“Types of writes”, Available at: http://smalldatum.blogspot.in/2014/04/types-of-writes.html, Apr. 17, 2014, 3 pages.Applicant
- Cohen,“Automatic Strategies in the Siemens RTL Tiled Window Manager”, In Proceedings: The 2nd IEEE Conference on Computer Workstations, Mar. 7, 1988, pp. 111-119.Applicant
- Eckel,“Personalize Alerts with the Help of OS X Mavericks Notifications”, Retrieved from: <http://www.techrepublic.com/article/customize-os-x-mavericks-notifications-to-personalize-alerts/> Jul. 8, 2014, Mar. 10, 2014, 7 Pages.Applicant
- Elnaka,“Real-Time Traffic Classification for Unified Communication Networks”, In Proceedings of International Conference on Selected Topics in Mobile and Wireless Networking, Aug. 19, 2013, 6 pages.Applicant
- Hepburn,“Color: The Location Based Social Photo App”, Available at: http://www.digitalbuzzblog.com/color-the-location-based-social-photo-iphone-app/, Mar. 27, 2011, 12 pages.Applicant
- Johnson,“Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 Review”, Retrieved From: <http://hothardware.com/Reviews/Samsung-Galaxy-Tab-Pro-101-Review/?page=3#!baG2DY > Jul. 9, 2014, Mar. 21, 2014, 10 Pages.Applicant
- Kandogan,“Elastic Windows: Improved Spatial Layout and Rapid Multiple Window Operations”, In Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces, May 27, 1996, 10 Pages.Applicant
- Levandoski,“Latch-Free, Log-Structured Storage for Multiple Access Methods”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/924,567, filed Jun. 22, 2013, 51 pages.Applicant
- Levandoski,“The Bw-Tree: A B-tree for New Hardware Platforms”, In IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering, Apr. 8, 2013, 12 pages.Applicant
- Li,“QRON: QoS-Aware Routing in Overlay Networks”, In Proceedings of IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2004, 12 pages.Applicant
- Mack,“Moto X: The First Two Weeks”, Retrieved From: <http://www.gizmag.com/two-weeks-motorola-google-moto-x-review/28722/> Jul. 8, 2014, Aug. 16, 2013, 8 pages.Applicant
- O'Reilly,“How to Use the Microsoft Surface Touch Screen and Keyboard”, Retrieved From: <http://www.cnet.com/how-to/how-to-use-the-microsoft-surface-touch-screen-and-keyboard/> Jul. 5, 2014, Nov. 6, 2012, 5 Pages.Applicant
- Paul,“Three Windows Multitasking Features That Help Maximize Your Screen Space”, Retrieved From: <http://www.pcworld.com/article/2094124/three-windows-multitasking-features-that-help-maximize-your-screen-space.html> Jul. 4, 2014, Feb. 4, 2014, 4 Pages.Applicant
- Prohaska,“Fast Updates with TokuDB”, Available at: http://www.tokutek.com/2013/02/fast-updates-with-tokudb/, Feb. 12, 2013, 2 pages.Applicant
- Thurrott,“Nokia Lumia “Black”: Glance 2.0”, Retrieved From:<http://winsupersite.com/windows-phone/nokia-lumia-black-glance-20> Jul. 8, 2014, Jan. 11, 2014, 3 Pages.Applicant
- Vranjes,“Application Window Divider Control for Window Layout Management”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,369, filed Apr. 15, 2013, 21 pages.Applicant
- Wiebe,“Using screen space efficiently with Gridmove”, Available at: http://lowerthought.wordpress.com/2010/05/15/using-screen-space-efficiently-with-gridmove/, May 15, 2010, 2 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2015/042371, Oct. 2, 2015, 10 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2015/042187, Oct. 20, 2015, 10 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2015/042226, Oct. 27, 2015, 10 Pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2015/042205, Oct. 30, 2015, 10 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2015/042218, Nov. 6, 2015, 10 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2015/042259, Oct. 12, 2015, 11 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2015/041930, Oct. 20, 2015, 12 Pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2015/041900, Oct. 21, 2015, 12 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2015/041909, Oct. 20, 2015, 13 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2015/041046, Nov. 9, 2015, 15 pages.Applicant
- “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/447,464, Nov. 9, 2015, 10 pages.Applicant
- Ando,“Development of Three-Dimensional Microstages Using Inclined Deep-Reactive Ion Etching”, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Jun. 1, 2007, 10 pages.Applicant
- Antonopoulos,“Efficient Updates for Web-Scale Indexes over the Cloud”, IEEE 28th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops, Apr. 2012, 8 pages.Applicant
- Garcia,“COMET: Content Mediator Architecture for Content-Aware Networks”, In IEEE Future Network & Mobile Summit, 2011, 8 pages.Applicant
- Gila,“First Results From a Multi-Ion Beam Lithography and Processing System at The University of Florida”, AIP Conference Proceedings, Jun. 1, 2011, 6 pages.Applicant
- Levandoski,“Ranking and New Database Architectures”, In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Ranking in Databases, Aug. 2013, 4 pages.Applicant
- Cottier, “Label-free Highly Sensitive Detection of (small) Molecules by Wavelength Interrogation of Integrated Optical Chips”, n Proceedings of Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 91, Issue 1-3, Jun. 1, 2003, pp. 241-251.Applicant
- Greiner, et al.,'“Bandpass engineering of lithographically scribed channel-waveguide Bragg gratings”, In Proceedings of Optics Letters, vol. 29, No. 8, Apr. 15, 2004, pp. 806-808.Applicant
- Ismail, et al.,'“Improved Arrayed-Waveguide-Grating Layout Avoiding Systematic Phase Errors”, In Proceedings of Optics Express, vol. 19, No. 9, Apr. 25, 2011, pp. 8781-8794.Applicant
- “Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,879, Sep. 19, 2014, 3 pages.Applicant
- “Augmented Reality and Physical Games”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,165, Apr. 5, 2012, 49 pages.Applicant
- “BragGrate Mirror”, Retrieved from <http://web.archive.org/web/20090814104232/http://www.optigrate.com/BragGrate—Mirror.html> on Jul. 8, 2014, Aug. 14, 2009, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Corrected Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/432,311, Dec. 24, 2014, 25 pages.Applicant
- “Corrected Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,836, Sep. 11, 2014, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Corrected Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,836, Dec. 15, 2014, 2 pages.Applicant
- “DigiLens”, SBG Labs—retrieved from <http://www.digilens.com/products.html> on Jun. 19, 2012, 1 page.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/336,873, Jan. 5, 2015, 21 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/336,895, May 27, 2014, 11 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,836, Mar. 10, 2014, 18 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,914, Feb. 23, 2015, 21 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,914, Jun. 19, 2014, 11 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,495, May 29, 2014, 10 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,516, Jan. 29, 2015, 13 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,539, Jun. 29, 2015, 11 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,879, Jul. 14, 2014, 12 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/432,311, Dec. 15, 2014, 24 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/432,372, Jan. 29, 2015, 33 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,165, Jun. 6, 2014, 12 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,165, Jul. 21, 2015, 11 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,646, Feb. 23, 2015, 36 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,646, May 5, 2014, 26 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,649, Oct. 9, 2014, 8 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/774,875, Jun. 4, 2015, 10 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/134,993, Jul. 16, 2015, 19 pages.Applicant
- “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/134,993, Aug. 20, 2014, 15 pages.Applicant
- “Foreign Notice of Allowance”, CN Application No. 201320034345.X, Aug. 14, 2013, 2 Pages.Applicant
- “Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201210563730.3, Jan. 7, 2015, 16 pages.Applicant
- “Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201210567932.5, Aug. 14, 2014, 12 pages.Applicant
- “Foreign Office Action”, EP Application No. 13769961.7, Mar. 11, 2015, 8 pages.Applicant
- “Foreign Office Action”, EP Application No. 13769961.7, Jun. 30, 2015, 6 pages.Applicant
- “HDTV Helmet Mounted Display”, Available at <http://defense-update.com/products/h/HDTV-HMD.htm>, Jan. 26, 2005, 1 page.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2012/069331, Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2014/016658, Apr. 23, 2014, 10 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/053676, Oct. 16, 2013, 10 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/030632, Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/028477, Jun. 21, 2013, 11 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/031111, Jun. 26, 2013, 11 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/076832, Mar. 17, 2014, 12 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/061225, Jun. 4, 2014, 12 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2012/071563, Apr. 25, 2013, 13 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/021784, Apr. 30, 2013, 9 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2012/069330, Mar. 28, 2013, 9 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/021783, May 15, 2013, 9 pages.Applicant
- “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/026200, Jun. 3, 2013, 9 pages.Applicant
- “Light Guide Techniques using LED Lamps”, Application Brief I-003, retrieved from <http://www.ciri.org.nz/downloads/Lightpipe%20design.pdf> on Jan. 12, 2012, Oct. 14, 2008, 22 pages.Applicant
- “New Technology from MIT may Enable Cheap, Color, Holographic Video Displays”, Retrieved from <http://www.gizmag.com/holograph-3d-color-video-display-inexpensive-mit/28029/> on Feb. 25, 2015, Jun. 24, 2013, 8 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,495, Nov. 13, 2013, 8 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,165, Feb. 6, 2014, 12 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/336,873, Apr. 9, 2015, 18 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/336,873, Jul. 25, 2014, 16 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/336,895, Oct. 24, 2013, 9 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,675, Jul. 16, 2013, 9 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,836, Nov. 4, 2013, 15 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,914, Feb. 14, 2014, 10 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,914, Oct. 28, 2014, 18 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,495, Apr. 3, 2015, 11 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,516, Jun. 12, 2014, 11 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,516, Nov. 25, 2013, 10 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,539, Mar. 16, 2015, 9 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,617, May 5, 2015, 6 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,617, Oct. 9, 2014, 6 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,879, Feb. 24, 2015, 10 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,879, Mar. 17, 2014, 10 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,879, Jun. 26, 2015, 13 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/432,311, Jun. 2, 2015, 25 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/432,311, Jul. 8, 2014, 33 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/432,372, May 9, 2014, 26 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/432,372, Oct. 24, 2014, 27 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,165, Feb. 13, 2015, 10 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,165, Oct. 16, 2014, 11 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,646, Jun. 18, 2015, 43 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,646, Oct. 6, 2014, 34 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/477,646, Nov. 22, 2013, 20 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,649, Jan. 29, 2014, 7 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,649, Feb. 5, 2015, 7 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,649, Jun. 5, 2014, 7 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,073, Jan. 23, 2015, 7 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/631,308, Feb. 23, 2015, 9 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,917, May 21, 2015, 12 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/774,875, Nov. 24, 2014, 8 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/134,993, Jan. 22, 2015, 17 pages.Applicant
- “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/134,993, Apr. 17, 2014, 34 pages.Applicant
- “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/336,895, Aug. 11, 2014, 6 pages.Applicant
- “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,675, Sep. 16, 2013, 8 pages.Applicant
- “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,836, Jun. 13, 2014, 11 pages.Applicant
- “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,836, Oct. 8, 2014, 11 pages.Applicant
- “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/356,545, Mar. 28, 2014, 6 pages.Applicant
- “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/488,145, Nov. 19, 2014, 8 pages.Applicant
- “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,836, Sep. 27, 2013, 6 pages.Applicant
- “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,539, Dec. 1, 2014, 6 pages.Applicant
- “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/488,145, Sep. 8, 2014, 14 pages.Applicant
- “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,073, Nov. 18, 2014, 7 pages.Applicant
- “Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/356,545, Jul. 22, 2014, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Supplementary European Search Report”, EP Application No. 13769961.7, Mar. 3, 2015, 3 pages.Applicant
- “Two-Faced: Transparent Phone with Dual Touch Screens”, Retrieved from <http://gajitz.com/two-faced-transparent-phone-with-dual-touch-screens/>, Jun. 7, 2012, 3 pages.Applicant
- “Variable Groove Depth (VGD) Master Gratings”, Retrieved From: <http://www.horiba.com/scientific/products/diffraction-gratings/catalog/variable-groove-depth-vgd/> May 28, 2014, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2013/061225, Oct. 10, 2014, 6 Pages.Applicant
- Allen,“ELiXIR—Solid-State Luminaire with Enhanced Light Extraction by Internal Reflection”, Journal of Display Technology, vol. 3, No. 2, Available at <http://www.nanolab.uc.edu/Publications/PDFfiles/355.pdf>, Jun. 2007, pp. 155-159.Applicant
- Aron,“‘Sprinting’ chips could push phones to the speed limit”, New Scientist, Feb. 20, 2012, Issue #2852, Feb. 20, 2012, 2 pages.Applicant
- Baluja,“Non-Intrusive Gaze Tracking Using Artificial Neural Networks”, Technical Report CMU-CS-94-102, Available at <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.33.4027&rep=rep1&type=pdf> , Jan. 5, 1994, 14 pages.Applicant
- Barger,“COTS Cooling”, Publication of the National Electronics Manufacturing Center of Excellence, Retrieved from: <http://www.empf.org/empfasis/2009/Oct09/cots.html > on Jul. 9, 2012, Oct. 2009, 4 pages.Applicant
- Baudisch,“Back-of-Device Interaction Allows Creating Very Small Touch Devices”, In Proceedings of 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Retrieved from <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.160.3337&rep=rep1&type=pdf >, Apr. 2005, 10 pages.Applicant
- Baxtor,“TwinTech GeForce GTS 250 XT OC 1GB Graphics Card”, retrieved from <http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/2733/twintech—geforce—gts—250—xt—oc—1gb—graphics—card/index3.html> on Dec. 30, 2011, Apr. 24, 2009, 4 pages.Applicant
- Chang-Yen,“A Monolithic PDMS Waveguide System Fabricated Using Soft-Lithography Techniques”, In Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 23, No. 6, Jun. 2005, 6 pages.Applicant
- Charles,“Design of Optically Path Length Matched, Three-Dimensional Photonic Circuits Comprising Uniquely Routed Waveguides”, In Proceedings of Applied Optics, vol. 51, Issue 27, Sep. 20, 2012, 11 pages.Applicant
- Chen,“A Study of Fiber-to-Fiber Losses in Waveguide Grating Routers”, In Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 15, No. 10, Oct. 1997, 5 pages.Applicant
- Chen,“Strategies for 3D Video with Wide Fields-of-View”, IEEE Proceeding Optoelectronics, vol. 148, Issue 2, Available at <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=926823>, Apr. 2001, pp. 85-90.Applicant
- Cheng,“Waveguide Displays Based on Polymer-dispersed Liquid Crystals”, SPIE Newsroom, Available at <http://spie.org/documents/Newsroom/Imported/003805/003805—10.pdf>, Aug. 12, 2011, 2 pages.Applicant
- Chirgwin,“Researchers propose ‘overclock’ scheme for mobiles—Processing at a sprint to overcome tech limitations”, The Register, Feb. 21, 2012, 2 pages.Applicant
- Coldewey,“Researchers Propose “Computational Sprinting” To Speed Up Chips by 1000%—But Only for a Second”, TechCrunch, Feb. 28, 2012, Feb. 29, 2012, 2 pages.Applicant
- DeAgazio,“Selecting Display Backlighting for Portable, Handheld Devices”, Hearst Electronics Products, retrieved from <http://www2.electronicproducts.com/Selecting—display—backlighting—for—portable—handheld—devices-article-farcglobal-feb2008-html.aspx> on Jan. 12, 2012, Jan. 2, 2008, 4 pages.Applicant
- Dumon,“Compact Arrayed Waveguide Grating Devices in Silicon-on-Insulator”, In Proceedings of the IEEE/LEOS Symposium Benelux Chapter, May 27, 2014, 4 pages.Applicant
- Eadicicco,“First Transparent Tablet Lets You Touch from Both Sides”, Retrieved from <http://blog.laptopmag.com/first-transparent-tablet>, Dec. 26, 2013, 4 pages.Applicant
- Glendenning,“Polymer Micro-Optics via Micro Injection Moulding”, Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20120310003606/http://www.microsystems.uk.com/english/polymer—optics—injection—moulding.html, Jan. 10, 2011, 6 pages.Applicant
- Grabarnik,“Concave Diffraction Gratings Fabricated with Planar Lithography”, In Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 6992, May 3, 2008, 8 pages.Applicant
- Greenemeier,“Could “Computational Sprinting” Speed Up Smart Phones without Burning Them Out?”, Scientific American, Feb. 29, 2012, 2 pages.Applicant
- Han,“Accurate diffraction efficiency control for multiplexed volume holographic gratings”, Retrieved at: opticalengineering.spiedigitallibrary.org/data/Journals/ . . . /2799—1, 2002, 4 pages.Applicant
- Hua,“Engineering of Head-mounted Projective Displays”, In Proceedings of Applied Optics, vol. 39, No. 22, Aug. 1, 2000, 11 pages.Applicant
- Jacques,“Polarized Light Imaging of Tissue”, Available at <http://www.lumamed.com/documents/5—polarized%20light%20imaging.pdf>, 2004, 17 pages.Applicant
- Jarvenpaa,“Compact near-to-eye display with integrated gaze tracker”, Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications, Mar. 19, 2010, 9 pages.Applicant
- Jaworski,“A Novel Design of Heat Sink with PCM for Electronics Cooling”, 10th International Conference on Thermal Energy Storage, Stockton, May 31-Jun. 2, 2006, retrieved from <https://intraweb.stockton.edu/eyos/energy—studies/content/docs/FINAL—PRESENTATIONS/4b-6%20.pdf> on Jan. 5, 2012, May 31, 2006, 8 pages.Applicant
- Karp,“Planar Micro-optic Solar Concentration using Multiple Imaging Lenses into a Common Slab Waveguide”, In Proceedings of SPIE vol. 7407, Available at <http://psilab.ucsd.edu/research/slab—concentration/files/SPIE—Slab—Published.pdf>, Jan. 2009, 11 pages.Applicant
- Kress,“Exit Pupil for Wearable See-through displays”, Downloaded from: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on Jan. 31, 2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms, 2012, 8 pages.Applicant
- Krishnan,“A Novel Hybrid Heat Sink Using Phase Change Materials for Transient Thermal Management of Electronics”, IEEE transactions on components and packaging technologies, vol. 28, No. 2, retrieved from <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1432936> on Jan. 5, 2012, Jun. 2005, pp. 281-289.Applicant
- L,“All-Nanoparticle Concave Diffraction Grating Fabricated by Self-Assembly onto Magnetically-Recorded Templates”, In Proceedings of Optical Express, vol. 21, Issue 1, Jan. 2013, 1 page.Applicant
- Lanman,“Near-eye Light Field Displays”, In Journal of ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 32, No. 6, Nov. 2013, 10 pages.Applicant
- Large,“Parallel Optics in Waveguide Displays: a Flat Panel Autostereoscopic”, Display Technology, Journal of, Retrieved from <http://download.microsoft.com/download/D/2/E/D2E425F8-CF3C-4C71-A4A2-70F9D4081007/ParallelOpticsinWaveguideDisplaysMS090925.Final.pdf>, Jun. 21, 2010, pp. 1-7.Applicant
- Lerner,“Penn Helps Rethink Smartphone Design with ‘Computational Sprinting’”, Penn News Release, Feb. 28, 2012, 2 pages.Applicant
- Li,“Design Optimization of Reflective Polarizers for LCD Backlight Recycling”, Journal of Display Technology, vol. 5, No. 8, Available at <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5196840 >, Aug. 2009, pp. 335-340.Applicant
- Li,“Switchable Electro-optic Diffractive Lens with High Efficiency for Ophthalmic Applications”, PNAS Apr. 18, 2006 vol. 103 No. 16 6100-6104, Retrieved from: <http://www.pnas.org/content/103/16/6100.long> Feb. 22, 2012, Feb. 2, 2006, 4 pages.Applicant
- Lindau,“Controlling the Groove Depth of Holographic Gratings”, In Proceedings of Optical System Design, Analysis, and Production, vol. 0399, Oct. 26, 1983, 2 pages.Applicant
- Man,“IT Equipment Noise Emission Standards: Overview of New Development in the Next Edition of ISO/ECMA Standards”, In Proceedings of 37th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, Available at <http://www.ecma-international.org/activities/Acoustics/Inter-noise%202008%20paper%20on%20ECMA-74%20updates.pdf >, Oct. 26, 2008, 8 pages.Applicant
- Massenot,“Multiplexed holographic transmission gratings recorded in holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystals: static and dynamic studies”, Retrieved at: http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/2874/, 2005, 8 pages.Applicant
- McMillan,“Your Future iPhone May Be Stuffed with Wax”, Aug. 23, 2013, 3 pages.Applicant
- Mei,“An all fiber interferometric gradient hydrophone with optical path length compensation”, In Proceedings of Summaries of Papers Presented at the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, May 28, 1999, 2 pages.Applicant
- Melcher,“LCoS for High Performance Displays”, In Proceedings of LEOS 2003, Available at <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1253048>, Oct. 27, 2003, pp. 812-813.Applicant
- Minier,“Diffraction Characteristics of Superimposed Holographic gratings in Planar Optical waveguides”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 4, No. 10, Oct. 1992, 4 pages.Applicant
- Moore,“Computational sprinting pushes smartphones till they're tired”, Michigan News Release, Feb. 28, 2012, 2 pages.Applicant
- Morga,“History of SAW Devices”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium, May 27, 1998, 22 pages.Applicant
- Nguyen,“Advanced Cooling System Using Miniature Heat Pipes in Mobile PC”, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technology, vol. 23, No. 1, Available at <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=833046&userType=inst>, Mar. 2000, pp. 86-90.Applicant
- Owano,“Study explores computing bursts for smartphones”, PhysOrg.com, Feb. 21, 2012, 2 pages.Applicant
- Papaefthymiou,“Computational Sprinting on a Hardware/Software Testbed”, In the Proceedings of the 18th Eighteenth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS), Mar. 2013., 12 pages.Applicant
- Patrizio,“Researchers Working on Ways to Put 16-Core Processors in Smartphones”, Brighthand, Mar. 18, 2012, 2 pages.Applicant
- Pu,“Exposure schedule for multiplexing holograms in photopolymer films”, Retrieved at: lo.epfl.ch/webdav/site/lo/shared/1996/OE—35—2824—Oct1996.pdf, Oct. 1996, 6 pages.Applicant
- Raghavan,“Computational Sprinting”, In the Proceedings of the 18th Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), Feb. 2012, 12 pages.Applicant
- Raghavan,“Designing for Responsiveness with Computational Sprinting”, IEEE Micro's “Top Picks of 2012” Issue, May 2013, 8 pages.Applicant
- Scott,“RearType: Text Entry Using Keys on the Back of a Device”, In Proceedings of 12th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Retrieved from <https://research.microsoft.com/pubs/135609/reartype%20mobilehci.pdf>, Sep. 7, 2010, 9 pages.Applicant
- Singh“Laser-Based Head-Tracked 3D Display Research”, Journal of Display Technology, vol. 6, No. 10, Available at <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5462999>, Oct. 2010, pp. 531-543.Applicant
- Smalley,“Anisotropic Leaky-Mode Modulator for Holographic Video Displays”, In Proceedings of Nature, vol. 498, Jun. 20, 2013, 6 pages.Applicant
- Stupar,“Optimization of Phase Change Material Heat Sinks for Low Duty Cycle High Peak Load Power Supplies”, IEEE transactions on components, packaging and manufacturing technology, retrieved from <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6081913> on Jan. 5, 2012, Nov. 15, 2011, 14 pages.Applicant
- Tari,“CFD Analyses of a Notebook Computer Thermal Management System and a Proposed Passive Cooling Alternative”, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, vol. 33, No. 2, retrieved from <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5466211> on Dec. 30, 2011, Jun. 2010, pp. 443-452.Applicant
- Teng,“Fabrication of nanoscale zero-mode waveguides using microlithography for single molecule sensing”, In Proceedings of Nanotechnology, vol. 23, No. 45, Jul. 7, 2012, 7 pages.Applicant
- Tien,“Microcontact Printing of SAMs”, In Proceedings of Thin Films, vol. 24, May 28, 2014, 24 pages.Applicant
- Travis,“Collimated Light from a Waveguide for a Display Backlight”, Optics Express—Retrieved from <http://download.microsoft.com/download/D/2/E/D2E425F8-CF3C-4C71- A4A2-70F9D4081007/OpticsExpressbacklightpaper.pdf>, Oct. 15, 2009, pp. 19714-19719.Applicant
- Travis,“The Design of Backlights for View-Sequential 3D”, Microsoft Corporation, Available at <http://download.microsoft.com/download/D/2/E/D2E425F8-CF3C-4C71-A4A2-70F9D4081007/Backlightforviewsequentialautostereo.docx>, Jul. 3, 2010, 4 pages.Applicant
- van“A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations”, The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 2010, 9(2), Available at <http://www.ijvr.org/issues/issue2-2010/paper1%20.pdf>, Jun. 2010, pp. 1-19.Applicant
- Walker,“Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme CPU Cooler”, retrieved from <http://www.pro-clockers.com/cooling/66-thermalright-ultra-120-extreme-cpu-cooler.html> on Dec. 30, 2011, Jul. 2, 2009, 7 pages.Applicant
- Westerinen,“Light Guide Display and Field of View”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/428,879, Mar. 23, 2012, 46 pages.Applicant
- Wigdor,“LucidTouch: A See-Through Mobile Device”, In Proceedings of 20th Annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Retrieved from <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1294259>, Oct. 7, 2007, 10 pages.Applicant
- Xie,“Fabrication of Varied-Line-Spacing Grating by Elastic Medium”, In Proceedings SPIE 5636, Holography, Diffractive Optics, and Applications II, Nov. 2004, 4 pages.Applicant
- Yan,“Multiplexing holograms in the photopolymer with equal diffraction efficiency”, 2005, 9 pages.Applicant
- Zharkova,“Study of the Dynamics of Transmission Gratings Growth on Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystals”, International Conference on Methods of Aerophysical Research, ICMAR 2008, 2008, 4 pages.Applicant
- “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/447,419, Aug. 4, 2015, 6 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/447,419, Feb. 2, 2016, 8 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,574, Feb. 26, 2016, 22 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,710, Mar. 2, 2016, 16 pages.Applicant
- Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,723, Feb. 9, 2016, 10 pages.Applicant
- Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,735, Apr. 5, 2016, 12 pages.Applicant
- Supplemental Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/447,464, Jan. 12, 2016, 2 pages.Applicant
- Corrected Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,723, Apr. 20, 2016, 7 pages.Applicant
- Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/447,419, May 17, 2016, 10 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/015496, Apr. 11, 2016, 11 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/016241, Apr. 20, 2016, 12 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/016029, May 12, 2016, 12 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016015869, May 12, 2016, 12 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/016027, May 17, 2016, 13 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/019006, May 12, 2016, 14 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/015497, May 19, 2016, 17 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,606, May 23, 2016, 12 pages.Applicant
- Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,723, May 24, 2016, 7 pages.Applicant
- Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,746, Apr. 11, 2016, 7 pages.Applicant
- Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,683, May 9, 2016, 6 pages.Applicant
- Kim,“Determination of small angular displacement by moire fringes of matched radial-parallel gratings”, Applied Optics, vol. 36, No. 13, May 1997, 8 pages.Applicant
- Levola, “Diffractive optics for virtual reality displays”, Journal of the Society for Information Display—SID, Jan. 1, 2006, 9 pages.Applicant
- Theocaris, “Radial Gratings as Moire Gauges”, Journal of Physics E. Scientific Instruments, Jun. 1, 1968, 6 pages.Applicant
- Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/774,875, Apr. 22, 2016, 10 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/015873, May 23, 2016, 11 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/016028, May 25, 2016, 11 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/015869, May 12, 2016, 12 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/016242, May 27, 2016, 14 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,927, Jun. 3, 2016, 8 pages.Applicant
- Corrected Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,735, Jun. 20, 2016, 2 pages.Applicant
- Corrected Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,735, Jul. 21, 2016, 2 pages.Applicant
- Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,710, Aug. 2, 2016, 19 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/015871, Jun. 13, 2016, 13 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,666, Jul. 26, 2016, 21 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,683, Aug. 3, 2016, 14 pages.Applicant
- Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,574, Jul. 20, 2016, 13 pages.Applicant
- Second Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2015/041909, Jun. 21, 2016, 6 pages.Applicant
- Second Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2015/041930, Jun. 21, 2016, 5 pages.Applicant
- Berger, “Photonic Band Gaps and Holography”, Journal of Applied Physics 82 (1), Jul. 1997, 6 pages.Applicant
- Corrected Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,574, Sep. 12, 2016, 10 pages.Applicant
- Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/447,419, Aug. 29, 2016, 11 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,606, Sep. 9, 2016, 12 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/432,311, Aug. 17, 2016, 18 pages.Applicant
- Second Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2015/041900, Jun. 30, 2016, 6 pages.Applicant
- Corrected Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,574, Oct. 21, 2016, 2 pages.Applicant
- Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,710, Oct. 7, 2016, 9 pages.Applicant