US 9,733,486 B2Grant
Systems and methods for controlling aliasing in images captured by an array camera for use in super-resolution processing
Issue Date:2017-08-15
•19 Claims
•13 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
Imager arrays, array camera modules, and array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention utilize pixel apertures to control the amount of aliasing present in captured images of a scene. One embodiment includes a plurality of focal planes, control circuitry configured to control the capture of image information by the pixels within the focal planes, and sampling circuitry configured to convert pixel outputs into digital pixel data. In addition, the pixels in the plurality of focal planes include a pixel stack including a microlens and an active area, where light incident on the surface of the microlens is focused onto the active area by the microlens and the active area samples the incident light to capture image information, and the pixel stack defines a pixel area and includes a pixel aperture, where the size of the pixel apertures is smaller than the pixel area.
Metadata
Assignee
- FotoNation Cayman Limited
Inventors
- Dan Lelescu
- Kartik Venkataraman
Application Information
Application Number:US 14/814,297
Filing Date:2015-07-30
Priority Date:2013-03-13
Art Unit:2661
Classifications
IPC:
H04N5/225G02B27/58H04N9/04H01L27/146G02B3/00G02B5/00H04N5/378
Patent Drawings (13 sheets)
Description
Cross-Reference to Related Application
[0001] The present invention is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/802,507 entitled “Systems and Methods for Controlling Aliasing in Images Captured by an Array Camera for Use in Super-Resolution Processing,” filed Mar. 13, 2013. The disclosure of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/802,507 is hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates to super-resolution processing and more specifically to controlling aliasing in an array camera during super-resolution processing.
Background
[0003] In a typical imaging device, light enters through an opening (aperture) at one end of the imaging device and is directed to an image sensor by one or more optical elements such as lenses. The image sensor includes pixels that generate signals upon receiving light via the optical element. Commonly used image sensors include charge-coupled device image sensors (CCDs) and complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) sensors.
[0004] Conventional digital cameras typically achieve color separation by performing color separation in the optical path and using a separate image sensor for the wavelengths of light corresponding to each of the primary colors (i.e. RGB), using an image sensor with color separation and multiple signal collection capability within each pixel, or by applying filters over a single sensor so that individual pixels detect wavelengths of light corresponding to one of the primary colors. Use of filters is particularly common in cameras that have a small form factor, such as cameras incorporated in mobile phone handsets and other consumer electronics devices including but not limited to, laptop computers and televisions. A common filter that is formed on image sensors is the Bayer filter, the pattern of which includes 50% green filters, 25% red filters, and 25% blue filters. The output of an image sensor to which a Bayer filter is applied can be reconstructed as a color image using interpolation techniques.
[0005] Image sensors are subject to various performance constraints including, among others, dynamic range, signal to noise (SNR) ratio and low light sensitivity. The dynamic range is defined as the ratio of the maximum possible signal that can be captured by a pixel to the total noise signal. The SNR of a captured image is, to a great extent, a measure of image quality. In general, as more light is captured by the pixel, the higher the SNR. The light sensitivity of an image sensor is typically determined by the intensity of light incident upon the sensor pixels. At low light levels, each pixel's light gathering capability is constrained by the low signal levels incident upon each pixel.
[0006] A challenge associated with increasing the number of pixels in an image sensor is that the lens system is dimensioned to span the image sensor. The problem is most acute with mobile cameras, such as those used in mobile phones and consumer electronics devices, where the form factor of the lens system can significantly impact the overall form factor of the mobile device.
[0007] In response to the constraints placed upon a traditional digital camera based upon the camera obscura, a new class of cameras that can be referred to as array cameras have been proposed. Array cameras are characterized in that they include multiple arrays of pixels, each having a separate lens system. Examples of 2, 3 and 4 array cameras in which each array of pixels captures light from a different band of the visible spectrum and the captured images are combined to create a full color image are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,199,348 to Olsen et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. U.S. Pat. No. 7,262,799 to Suda, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, discloses a 2×2 array camera including one sensor used to sense a red (R) image signal, one sensor used to sense a blue (B) image signal and, two sensors used to sense green (G) image signals.
Summary of the Invention
[0008] Imager arrays, array camera modules, and array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention are configured to introduce a predetermined amount of aliasing into captured images of a scene that can then be used to construct a super-resolution image by super-resolution processing system. One embodiment of the invention includes a plurality of focal planes, where each focal plane includes a two dimensional arrangement of pixels having at least two pixels in each dimension and each focal plane is contained within a region of the imager array that does not contain pixels from another focal plane, control circuitry configured to control the capture of image information by the pixels within the focal planes, and sampling circuitry configured to convert pixel outputs into digital pixel data. In addition, the pixels in the plurality of focal planes include a pixel stack including a microlens and an active area, where light incident on the surface of the microlens is focused onto the active area by the microlens and the active area samples the incident light to capture image information, and the pixel stack defines a pixel area and includes a pixel aperture, where the size of the pixel aperture is smaller than the pixel area.
[0009] In some embodiments in accordance with this invention, a pixel aperture is formed by a microlens that is smaller than the pixel area to introduce a certain amount of aliasing into the information captured by the pixel. In further embodiments, the pixel area may be increased to be substantially equal to or greater that the focal point of the microlens in a pixel stack to introduce a certain amount of aliasing into the captured information. In still further embodiments, the pixel pitch or distance between pixels is adjusted to introduce a certain amount of aliasing into the information captured by the pixels. In still yet further embodiments, two or more of the previously described techniques are used to introduce a certain amount of aliasing into the captured information.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0010] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an array camera in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
[0011] FIG. 2 is a conceptual illustration of an array camera module formed from an optic array of lens stacks and an imager array in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
[0012] FIG. 3 is a conceptual illustration of focal planes on an imager array in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
[0013] FIG. 4A is a cross-sectional view of a conventional gapless microlens pixel stack that is typical of the pixel stacks used in many conventional cameras.
[0014] FIG. 4B is a cross-sectional view of a pixel stack including a pincushion microlens that can increase the aliasing present in a captured image relative to the gapless microlens illustrated in FIG. 4A .
[0015] FIG. 4C is a cross-sectional view of a pixel stack having a sensor area that is larger than a focal point of the microlens on the top of the pixel stack.
[0016] FIG. 4D is a top-side view of an array of pixels in an imager of an array camera having a pixel pitch that is
[0017] FIG. 5 illustrates an image processing pipeline in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
[0018] FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a process for performing hypothesized fusion using forward mappings of high resolution images fused at different hypothesized depths in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
[0019] FIG. 6A is a flow chart illustrating a process for performing hypothesized fusion by looking at the similarity of pixel stacks in portions of fused higher resolution images at different hypothesized depths in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
[0020] FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating a process for performing hypothesized fusion in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
[0021] FIG. 8A illustrates an array camera module including 6 Blue cameras, 13 Green Cameras, and 6 Red cameras.
[0022] FIGS. 8B and 8C illustrates two sets of Green cameras in the array camera module illustrated in FIG. 8A that can be utilized to perform hypothesized fusion in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
[0023] FIG. 9A is an image generated by performing super-resolution processing on images of a scene captured using an imager array having gapless microlenses.
[0024] FIG. 9B is an image generated by performing super-resolution processing on images of a scene in which aliasing has been increased in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Detailed Description
[0025] Turning now to the drawings, systems and methods for controlling the amount of aliasing in images captured by an array camera and for synthesizing higher resolution images from the captured images using super-resolution processing in accordance with embodiments of the invention are illustrated. Images exhibit aliasing when they are sampled at too low a sampling frequency, resulting in visible steps on diagonal lines or edges (also referred to as “jaggies”) and artificial low frequency patterns (often referred to as Moiré). These artifacts are a product of the incorrect sampling of higher frequencies, which results in the higher frequencies folding back (being aliased) into lower frequencies. Aliasing is generally undesirable, however, array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention can utilize the high frequency information folded into the lower frequencies during super-resolution processing. In a super-resolution process, low resolution images that include sampling diversity (i.e. represent sub-pixel offset shifted views of a scene) are used to synthesize one or more higher resolution images. Each low resolution image samples a slightly different part of the scene and the super-resolution process utilizes the sampling diversity to synthesize a higher resolution image by fusing the multiple low-resolution images together on a higher resolution grid. Various super-resolution processes are discussed in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/967,807, entitled “Systems and Methods for Synthesizing High Resolution Images Using Super-Resolution Processes”, to Lelescu et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Due to the fact that each low resolution image includes a sub-pixel shifted view of the scene, aliasing present in each of the low resolution images is slightly different. Therefore, the aliasing in each of the images provides useful information about high frequency image content that can be exploited by the super-resolution process to increase the overall resolution of the synthesized image.
[0026] In a number of embodiments, increasing the amount of aliasing in the low resolution images captured by an array camera can increase the resolution achieved through super-resolution processing. The amount of aliasing in captured images of a band limited spectrum of light (e.g. visible light) incident on the pixels can be controlled in any of a variety of ways including (but not limited to) using pixel apertures, modifying pixel pitch, modifying the size of the pixel area and/or increasing the optical resolution of the optical channels used to form images on the pixels of a focal plane so that the pixels sample the received light at a frequency that is less than twice the highest frequency of light within the band limited spectrum.
[0027] Increasing aliasing in captured low resolution images can complicate parallax detection and correction when performing super-resolution processing. Aliasing is a result of insufficient spatial sampling frequency in each camera, and can manifest itself differently in the images captured by the different cameras. In a number of embodiments, pixel correspondence in the presence of aliasing is determined using an approach that can be referred to as “hypothesized fusion”. Since aliasing effects are varied in the different images, at incorrect depths, a fused image is likely to be considerably different from the scene. At the correct depth, high resolution information obtained from the aliasing in the low resolution images increases the similarity between the synthesized high resolution image and the scene. Accordingly, hypothesized fusion processes in accordance with embodiments of the invention fuse high resolution images or portions of high resolution images using a set of low resolution images at a number of different hypothesized depths. The highest similarity between a fused high resolution image or high resolution image portion and a scene captured in a set of low resolution images is likely to be observed when correct depth hypotheses are utilized. The similarity between a fused high resolution image and a scene captured in a set of low resolution images can be determined in any of a variety of different ways. In several embodiments, similarity is determined by using a forward mapping to compare forward mappings of the fused high resolution image at a hypothesized depth to the captured low resolution images. In many embodiments, the similarity of pixels in pixel stacks of a portion of a fused high resolution image are used to indicate the likely similarity of the portion of the fused high resolution image to the scene captured by the low resolution images. In a number of embodiments, multiple fused high resolution images or high resolution image portions are generated using different subsets of the captured low resolution images at different hypothesized depths and the multiple fused high resolution images or high resolution image portions are compared to determine the hypothesized depth at which the fused high resolution images or high resolution image portions are best matched. In several embodiments, the sets of focal planes used to fuse the high resolution images utilized during hypothesized fusion include focal planes that are common to two or more of the sets. In a number of embodiments, the viewpoint of one of the focal planes is used as the reference viewpoint for synthesizing a high resolution image and the reference focal plane is common to the sets of focal planes used during hypothesized fusion. In other embodiments, disjoint sets of focal planes are utilized.
[0028] By analyzing the similarity of a fused high resolution image or image portion to the scene captured in a set of low resolution images at different hypothesized depths, depth information can be obtained that can be used to perform parallax correction and complete the super-resolution processing of the low resolution images. Although much of the discussion that follows refers to determining depths based upon portions of fused high resolution images, it should be appreciated that analysis using fused high resolution images is computationally efficient and that additional processing can be utilized to refine the fused high resolution images during analysis up to an including synthesizing high resolution images. Accordingly, references to fused high resolution images in the discussion of hypothesized fusion should be understood as encompassing images obtained by simply performing raw fusion, which places captured image samples onto a higher resolution grid (possibly resulting in overlaps and missing sample positions), and encompassing images obtained by performing additional processing beyond the raw fusion. The distinctions between obtaining an high resolution image through raw fusion and synthesizing an high resolution image using super-resolution processing are explored more completely in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/967,807 incorporated by reference above.
[0029] Array cameras that control the amount of aliasing present in captured low resolution images using a variety of techniques including (but not limited) controlling the pixel pitch of the focal planes of the array camera, and/or adjusting the size of the active area of pixel and/or using pixel apertures to control attenuation of aliasing due to blur; and super-resolution processes that utilize hypothesized fusion to determine pixel correspondence in the presence of aliasing in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Array Camera Architecture
[0030] An array camera architecture that can be used in a variety of array camera configurations in accordance with embodiments of the invention is illustrated in FIG. 1 . The array camera 100 includes an array camera module 110, which is connected to an image processing pipeline module 120 and to a controller 130. In many embodiments, the image processing pipeline module 120 and controller 130 are implemented using software applications and/or firmware executing on a microprocessor. In other embodiments, the modules can be implemented using application specific circuitry.
[0031] The array camera module 110 includes two or more cameras, each of which receives light using a separate optical channel. The array camera module can also include other circuitry to control imaging parameters and sensors to sense physical parameters. The control circuitry can control imaging parameters such as exposure times, gain, and black level offset. In several embodiments, the circuitry for controlling imaging parameters may trigger each camera independently or in a synchronized manner. The array camera module can include a variety of other sensors, including but not limited to, dark pixels to estimate dark current at the operating temperature. Array camera modules that can be utilized in array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/935,504 entitled “Capturing and Processing of Images using Monolithic Camera Array with Heterogeneous Imagers” to Venkataraman et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0032] The image processing pipeline module 120 is hardware, firmware, software, or a combination for processing the images received from the array camera module 110. In many embodiments, the image processing pipeline module 120 is implemented using an image processing pipeline application that is stored in memory and used to configure a microprocessor. The image processing pipeline module 120 processes the multiple low resolution images captured by the array camera module and produces a synthesized high resolution image. In a number of embodiments, the image processing pipeline module 120 provides the synthesized image data via an output 122.
[0033] The controller 130 is hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof for controlling various operational parameters of the imager array 110. In a number of embodiments, the controller 130 is implemented using a controller application stored in memory and used to configure a microprocessor. The controller 130 receives inputs 132 from a user or other external components and sends operation signals to control the array camera module 110. The controller 130 can also send information to the image processing pipeline module 120 to assist processing of the low resolution images captured by the array camera module 110.
[0034] Although a specific array camera architecture is illustrated in FIG. 1 , alternative architectures that enable the capturing of low resolution images and application of super-resolution processes to produce one or more synthesized high resolution images can also be utilized in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Array camera modules and techniques for controlling the level of aliasing in the low resolution images captured by array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed below.
Array Camera Modules
[0035] U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/935,504 (incorporated by reference above) discloses a variety of array camera modules that can be utilized in array cameras. An exploded view of an array camera module formed by combining an optic array of lens stacks with a monolithic sensor that includes a corresponding array of focal planes is illustrated in FIG. 2 . The array camera module 200 includes an optic array of lens stacks 210 and a sensor or imager array 230 that includes an array of focal planes 240. The optic array of lens stacks 210 includes an array of lens stacks 220. Each lens stack creates a separate optical channel that resolves an image on a corresponding focal plane 240 on the sensor. The lens stacks may be of different types. For example, the optical channels may be used to capture images at different portions of the spectrum and the lens stack in each optical channel may be specifically optimized for the portion of the spectrum imaged by the focal plane associated with the optical channel. More specifically, an array camera module may be patterned with “π filter groups.” The term “π filter groups” refers to a pattern of color filters applied to the optic array of lens stacks of a camera module and processes for patterning array cameras with π filter groups are described in U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/641,164, entitled “Camera Modules Patterned with π Filter Groups”, Venkataraman et al. The disclosure of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/641,164 is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Filter patterns that can be utilized in array camera modules are disclosed further in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/935,504 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/641,165.
[0036] In accordance with embodiments of this invention, each lens stack 220 is configured not to be optically limited because the super-resolution imaging process is able to recover a higher resolution in the output image than the intrinsic resolution of the low resolution images captured by the focal planes of the imager array. Therefore, each lens stack 220 optically resolves with sufficient contrast spatial frequencies that are larger than the Nyquist frequency as defined by the pixel pitch of the underlying focal plane 240.
[0037] Each lens stack 220 is specified in terms of the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) curve over a range of spatial frequencies. The MTF is a Spatial Frequency Response (SFR) of the output signal contrast with the input spatial frequency. At low frequencies, the imaging system or focal plane 240 typically passes the signal unattenuated, which implies a contrast of 100%. At higher frequencies, the signal is attenuated and the degree of attenuation in the output signal from the focal plane 240 is expressed as a percentage with respect to the input signal. In an array camera it is desirable to receive content above the Nyquist frequency to allow the super-resolution process to recover higher resolution information. When multiple copies of an aliased signal are present, such as in multiple images from the focal planes 240 the information inherently present in the aliasing may be used to reconstruct the higher resolution signal. One skilled in the art will note that the aliasing patterns from the different focal planes 240 have slight differences due to the sampling diversity of the focal planes. These slight differences result from the slightly different viewing directions of the cameras used to capture the low resolution images that are either intentionally introduced or result from positional manufacturing tolerances of the individual focal planes. Thus, in accordance with some embodiments of this invention, the MTFs of the lens stacks 220 need to be at least as high as the desired high resolution output MTF to provide sufficient contrast.
[0038] An optic array of lens stacks may employ wafer level optics (WLO) technology. WLO is a technology that encompasses a number of processes, including, for example, molding of lens arrays on glass wafers, stacking of those wafers (including wafers having lenses replicated on either side of the substrate) with appropriate spacers, followed by packaging of the optics directly with the imager into a monolithic integrated module.
[0039] The WLO procedure may involve, among other procedures, using a diamond-turned mold to create each plastic lens element on a glass substrate. More specifically, the process chain in WLO generally includes producing a diamond turned lens master (both on an individual and array level), then producing a negative mould for replication of that master (also called a stamp or tool), and then finally forming a polymer replica on a glass substrate, which has been structured with appropriate supporting optical elements, such as, for example, apertures (transparent openings in light blocking material layers), and filters. Although the construction of optic arrays of lens stacks using specific WLO processes is discussed above, any of a variety of techniques can be used to construct optic arrays of lens stacks, for instance those involving precision glass molding, polymer injection molding or wafer level polymer monolithic lens processes. Any of a variety of well known techniques for designing lens stacks used in conventional cameras can be utilized to increase aliasing in captured images by improving optical resolution. Accordingly, the level of aliasing present in images captured by an array camera module in accordance with embodiments of the invention can be determined through selection of aspects of lens stacks including (but not limited to) adding lens surfaces, changing the F# of the lens stack, and selection of materials used in construction of lens stack. Imager arrays that can capture images formed by optic arrays of lens stacks in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Imager Arrays
[0040] Imager arrays can be implemented using any of a variety of configurations in which an array of focal planes is formed on one or more sensors. A variety of imager array architectures are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/106,797, entitled “Architectures for Imager Arrays and Array Cameras” to Pain et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. An imager array including multiple focal planes having independent read-out control and pixel digitization, where each focal plane has dedicated peripheral circuitry, in accordance with embodiments of the invention is illustrated in FIG. 3 . The imager array 300 includes a plurality of sub-arrays of pixels or focal planes 302, where each focal plane includes a two dimensional arrangement of pixels having at least two pixels in each dimension and each focal plane is contained within a region of the imager array that does not contain pixels from another focal plane. The focal planes have dedicated row control logic circuitry 304, which is controlled by a common row timing control logic circuitry 306. Although the column circuits and row decoder are shown as a single block on one side of the focal plane, the depiction as a single block is purely conceptual and each logic block can be split between the left/right and/or top/bottom of the focal plane so as to enable layout at double the pixel pitch. Laying out the control and read-out circuitry in this manner can result in a configuration where even columns are sampled in one bank of column (row) circuits and odd columns would be sampled in the other.
[0041] In a device including M×N focal planes, the read-out control logic includes M sets of column control outputs per row of focal planes (N). Each column sampling/read-out circuit 308 can also have dedicated sampling circuitry for converting the captured image information into digital pixel data. In many embodiments, the sampling circuitry includes an Analog Signal Processor (ASP), which includes an Analog Front End (AFE) amplifier circuit and an Analog to Digital Converter (ADC) 310. In other embodiments, any of a variety of analog circuitry can be utilized to convert captured image information into digitized pixel information. An ASP can be implemented in a number of ways, including but not limited to, as a single ASP operating at X pixel conversion per row period, where X is the number of pixels in a row of the focal plane served by the column sampling circuit (e.g. with a pipe-lined or SAR ADC), as X ASPs operating in parallel at 1 pixel conversion per row period or P ASPs operating in parallel at X/P conversions per row (see discussion below). A common read-out control circuit 312 controls the read-out of the columns in each imager.
[0042] In the illustrated embodiment, the master control logic circuitry 314 controls independent read-out of each imager. The master control logic circuitry 314 includes high-level timing control logic circuitry to control the image capture and read-out process of the individual focal plane. In a number of embodiments, the master control portion of this block can implement features including but not limited to: staggering the start points of image read-out such that each focal plane has a controlled temporal offset with respect to a global reference; controlling integration times of the pixels within specific focal planes to provide integration times specific to the spectral bandwidths being imaged; the horizontal and vertical read-out direction of each imager; the horizontal and vertical sub-sampling/binning/windowing of the pixels within each focal plane; the frame/row/pixel rate of each focal plane; and the power-down state control of each focal plane.
[0043] The master control logic circuitry 314 can also handle collection of pixel data from each of the imagers. In a number of embodiments, the master control logic circuitry packs the image data into a structured output format. Given that fewer than M×N output ports are typically used to output the image data (e.g. there are 2 output ports), the image data is time multiplexed onto these output ports. In a number of embodiments, a small amount of memory (FIFO) is used to buffer the data from the pixels of the imagers until the next available time-slot on the output port 316 and the master control logic circuitry 314 or other circuitry in the imager array periodically inserts codes into the data stream providing information including, but not limited to, information identifying a focal plane, information identifying a row and/or column within a focal plane, and/or information identifying the relative time at which the capture or read-out process began/ended for one or more of the focal planes. Relative time information can be derived from an on-chip timer or counter, whose instantaneous value can be captured at the start/end of read-out of the pixels from each imager either at a frame rate or a line rate. Additional codes can also be added to the data output so as to indicate operating parameters such as (but not limited to) the integration time of each focal plane, and channel gain. As is discussed further below, the host controller can fully re-assemble the data stream back into the individual images captured by each focal plane. In several embodiments, the imager array includes sufficient storage to buffer at least a complete row of image data from all focal planes so as to support reordering and or retiming of the image data from all focal planes such that the data is always packaged with the same timing/ordering arrangement regardless of operating parameters such as (but not limited to) integration time and relative read-out positions. In a number of embodiments, the imager array includes sufficient storage to buffer at least a complete line of image data from all focal planes so as to support reordering and or retiming of the image data from all focal planes such that the data is packaged in a convenient manner to ease the host's reconstruction of the image data, for example retiming/reordering the image data to align the data from all focal planes to a uniform row start position for all focal planes irrespective of relative read-out position.
[0044] Although specific imager array implementations are discussed above with reference to FIG. 3 , any of a variety of imager arrays can be utilized in an array camera including (but not limited to) the imager arrays disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/106,797 as appropriate to the requirements of a specific application in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The introduction of aliasing into images captured by an array camera and the recovery of high resolution information using the aliasing via super-resolution processing in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Introducing Aliasing into Images Captured by an Array Camera
[0045] From sampling theory it is known that the Nyquist frequency of an image sensor is simply one half the reciprocal of the pixel pitch. Frequencies above the Nyquist frequency cannot be sampled correctly by the image sensor and result in aliasing. Sampling theorem indicates that a judicious choice of pixel pitch (i.e. sampling rate) when sampling a bandlimited function can completely avoid aliasing, but it cannot avoid aliasing when sampling inherently non-bandlimited functions. Therefore, increasing the pixel pitch of an imager can increase the aliasing in images captured by the imager. As is discussed further below, aliasing present in a captured image can also be increased without increasing pixel pitch.
[0046] Instead of attempting to reduce aliasing, many systems in accordance with embodiments of the invention actively introduce aliasing through the design of the optics and pixel stacks in each of the cameras in the array camera. The aliasing introduced by design can be utilized in super-resolution processing to recover information with a spatial frequency approaching the spatial frequency of the images formed on the focal planes of the cameras by the optics, which is greater than the Nyquist frequency of the focal plane. The extent to which aliasing is present in images captured by pixels in a focal plane depends on a number of factors including the pixel pitch. In several embodiments, array camera modules are constructed so that the MTF characteristics of the optics are such that images formed on a focal plane include contrast at a spatial frequency that is slightly greater than the resolution of high resolution images synthesized by the array camera and significantly greater than the Nyquist frequency of the pixels in the focal plane. In several embodiments, the pixels in the focal plane include pixel apertures that reduce pixel blur thereby increasing the extent to which aliasing is present in the captured image. In several embodiments, pixel apertures are created using microlenses. In many embodiments, pixel apertures are created using light blocking materials. The extent of pixel blur can also be reduced by reducing the size of the active area of a pixel relative to the size of the pixel pitch. Various techniques for increasing aliasing present in images captured by focal planes of array cameras in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Using Pixel Pitch to Control Aliasing
[0047] In accordance with a number of embodiments of this invention, the pixel pitch or distance between pixels may be used to control aliasing. It is understood that the Nyquist frequency is equal to one-half the inverse of the pixel pitch. Sampling theorem indicates that a judicious choice of pixel pitch (i.e. sampling rate) when sampling a bandlimited signal can completely avoid aliasing. Filters are typically used within the optical channel of a camera to create a bandlimited signal having an MTF cutoff near the Nyquist frequency of the sensor. As discussed above, optical channels in accordance with embodiments of the invention are bandlimited, but at a frequency that is higher than the Nyquist frequency of the sensor so that images formed on the focal plane can resolve contrast at a spatial frequency corresponding to the highest frequency component of images synthesized by the array camera through super-resolution processing. However, aliasing relative to the bandlimited signal is desirable to facilitate information at a spatial resolution that is greater than the pixel pitch of the pixels on a focal plane. Therefore, increasing the pixel pitch of a focal plane can increase the aliasing in images captured by the focal plane. A pixel array of a focal plane having a pixel pitch selected to introduce aliasing into the images captured in accordance with embodiments of this invention is shown in FIG. 4D .
[0048] In FIG. 4D , a pixel array 450 includes pixel sensors 451-460. Adjacent pixels, such as 452,453; 453,457; and 451, 456 are spaced a certain distance apart from one another as indicated by lines 465-467. Lines 465-467 represent the pixel pitch between these pairs. As such, lines 465-467 are substantially equal to one another in accordance with these embodiments. However, some distance may be irregular in other embodiments without departing from this invention. The distance of the pixel pitch between adjacent pixels is determined to introduce a desired amount of aliasing. The pixel pitch is determined based on a desired amount of aliasing appropriate to the requirements of a specific application in accordance with embodiments of the invention. The pixel pitch is directly related to the super-resolution factor r between the images captured by the pixels in the focal plane and the spatial resolution of images synthesized using super-resolution processes by the array camera.
[0049] While the amount of aliasing that can be present in images captured by pixels in a focal plane is determined by the pixel pitch, the actual amount of aliasing present in the captured images is a function of the blur introduced within the optical channel. Blur tends to act as a smoothing filter that can smooth out the effects of aliasing. Techniques for reducing blur to increase the amount of high frequency information present within aliasing in capture images in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed below.
Using Microlenses to Decrease Blur and Increase Aliasing
[0050] In several embodiments, the aliasing present in images captured by an imager array is increased using microlenses that act as pixel apertures to reduce pixel blur. The manner in which microlenses can be used to increase the amount of aliasing in captured images can be appreciated with reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B . A conventional gapless microlens pixel stack that is typical of the pixel stacks used in many conventional cameras is illustrated in FIG. 4A . Although a single pixel stack is shown in FIG. 4A , one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the pixels that form a focal plane each have pixel stacks, which are similar. The pixel stack 400 includes a microlens 402, which is typically 0.3 μm at its thickest region (although this thickness can vary from company to company and process to process). The microlens sits atop an oxide layer 404, which is typically 0.3 μm thick. Beneath the oxide layer 404 is a color filter 406, which is typically 1.0 μm thick. The color filter 406 is above a nitride layer 408, which is typically 0.3 μm thick. The nitride layer 408 is above a second oxide layer 210, which is 1.0 μm thick, and sits atop the silicon 412 that includes the active area 414 of the sensor (typically a photodiode). Although specific dimensions are referenced above, the dimensions of a pixel stack are largely determined by the manufacturing processes utilized and the requirements of a specific application.
[0051] The main task of a microlens 402 is to gather the light incident on its surface and focus that light onto the small active area 414. The top oxide layer 404 separates the microlens layer from the color filter layer 406 and provides a suitable surface for effective microlens formation. The nitride passivation layer 408 and bottom oxide layer 410 provide support and isolation for the metal interconnects that are used to connect the various parts of the sensor. The active area 414 represents a small part of the pixel stack and is responsible for sampling the light incident on it. The pixel aperture (416) is determined by the spread of the microlens, which collects the light and focuses it on the active area 414. Due to the fact that the microlens spans the pixel area, the microlens 402 can be referred to as a gapless microlens.
[0052] The blur of the light field incident on a microlens array can be reduced by reducing the spread of the microlenses used in the pixel stacks of the focal plane. Thus, altering the microlenses in this fashion can be used to control the degree of aliasing present in captured images.
[0053] A microlens that results in increased aliasing in a captured image relative to the image that would be captured using the gapless microlens 402 illustrated in FIG. 4A is illustrated in FIG. 4B . The pixel stack 400′ includes a microlens 402′, which is smaller than the pixel area (i.e. the edges of microlens do not extend to the edges of the pixel area). The microlens 402′ increases the aliasing present in the captured image as compared to the gapless microlens 402 shown in FIG. 4A . The microlens thus effectively acts as a pixel aperture, controlling the amount of light that is incident on the photodiode. In many array cameras, the pixels in each focal plane are typically sensitive to only one color thus the color filters in the pixel stack can be reduced or removed entirely and placed in the optic array of lens stacks. In other embodiments, the pixels in at least one of the focal planes are patterned with a pattern of color filters corresponding to a Bayer pattern or a similar pattern appropriate to the requirements of a specific application. In the illustrated embodiment, the color filter is significantly thinner (e.g. less than 0.1 μm), which reduces the overall height of the pixel stack 200′. Although a specific pixel stack is illustrated in FIG. 4B , as will be appreciated from the description below other pixel stacks that incorporate pincushion microlenses, reduce or remove color filters, include light blocking materials to create pixel apertures that are smaller than the pixel pitch and/or have decreased pixel stack height can be utilized in imager arrays in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
[0054] An advantage of decreased pixel aperture can be increasing the amount of aliasing present in captured images and, therefore, the increase in resolution that can be recovered through super-resolution processing. Decreasing pixel apertures can come at the expense of decreased sensitivity. Although specific pixel stacks are described above, any of a variety of pixel stacks having pixel apertures that are smaller than the pitch of the pixels within a focal plane can be utilized as appropriate to the requirements of specific application in accordance with embodiments of the invention. As is discussed further below, decreasing the size of the pixel apertures within a focal plane can increase aliasing, which can be utilized during super-resolution processing to recover information concerning high frequency components of the image.
Factors Influencing Pixel Stack Design
[0055] Reducing the size of microlenses within the pixel stacks of the pixels in a focal plane can increase aliasing in images captured by the focal plane. However, reducing the size of the microlenses can also impact pixel sensitivity and crosstalk in the sensor. Any reduction in the size of the microlens relative to pixel pitch directly reduces the amount of light that is gathered (i.e. the sensitivity of the pixel). In many embodiments, each sensor in the focal plane is sensitive to only one color (e.g.: red, green, or blue). Therefore, the color filters on the pixel stack are all the same color. The absence of the ubiquitous Bayer filter implies that the pixels in a focal plane are not subject to inter-color crosstalk. This allows the use of color filters that are thinner than those in sensors with the Bayer filter, leading to correspondingly higher transmissivities. Therefore, the imagers in an array camera can have increased sensitivity compared to the sensors of a conventional camera outfitted with a Bayer color filter, which can offset the reduction in sensitivity associated with the pincushion microlens (i.e. a microlens that is smaller than the pixel pitch). In many embodiments, however, at least one focal plane in an imager array utilizes a Bayer color filter and the pixel stacks within the focal plane are configured accordingly.
[0056] When light entering the microlens/filter of one pixel stack is directed toward a neighboring pixel, the light that is passed from one pixel stack to another is referred to as crosstalk or more specifically as optical crosstalk. Finite difference time domain simulations have shown that the amount of crosstalk in a pixel stack is directly proportional to the height of the pixel stack. Removing or reducing the thickness of the color filter in the pixel stack reduces the overall height of the pixel stack and reduces optical crosstalk. In many embodiments rearranging the color filters from the pixel stack to the optic array of lens stacks can mitigate any increase in crosstalk associated with use of a microlens in the pixel stack.
[0057] When gaps are introduced between microlenses in a focal plane, the possibility exists that stray light can enter the pixel stack through the gaps and fall on the active area of the pixel stack, increasing the crosstalk and diminishing signal to noise ratio. In several embodiments, a light blocking material such as (but not limited to) a photoresist can be utilized to fill the gaps between the microlenses to reduce the likelihood that stray light will enter the pixel stack.
[0058] Although specific techniques are discussed above for increasing aliasing in the low resolution images through use of pixel apertures, other techniques including but not limited to techniques that utilize light blocking materials to create pixel apertures can also be utilized. Processes that can be used to recover higher resolution content from aliasing in low resolution images in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed below.
Modifying the Size of the Active Area of the Pixel Sensor to Decrease Aliasing Attenuation
[0059] In accordance with some embodiments, the size of the active area 414″ is decreased in pixel stack 400″ to decrease blur and increase the amount of aliasing in captured images as shown in FIG. 4C . All other components of the pixel stack 400″ in accordance with these embodiments are similar to the components of the pixel stack 400′ described above with reference to FIG. 4B and a complete description of these components is omitted for brevity. In pixel stack 400″, the size of the active area 414″ is decreased as compared to the size of the active area 414′ in FIG. 4B and 414 in FIG. 4A . The decrease in size can also be considered to be a decrease in the ratio of the size of the active area of the pixel relative to the pixel pitch. The decrease in size of the active area 414″ reduces blur and accordingly increases the amount of aliasing present in images captured by the focal plane to which the pixel belongs. In this way, the combination of pixel pitch and pixel size contribute to the extent of aliasing present in the captured images that can be recovered using super-resolution processing.
Combination of Techniques to Introduce Aliasing into Images
[0060] Based on the above descriptions of the various techniques for controlling the amount of aliasing present in captured images based upon the spatial frequency at which the camera optics resolve contrast, the Nyquist frequency of the focal plane (as determined by the pixel pitch), and the amount of blur introduced through the size of the pixel apertures and the active area of the pixels with reference to FIGS. 4B, 4C, and 4D , one skilled in the art will recognize that the amount of aliasing present in captured images is controlled using all of the above characteristics of a camera module. The extent of aliasing that is desirable is largely dependent upon the super-resolution factor, r, of the array camera (i.e. the ratio of the pixel pitch to resolution of the images synthesized by the array camera using super-resolution images). The amount of aliasing present in the captured images can be determined to achieve a desired amount of aliasing based upon the Nyquist frequency of the focal plane and the attenuation introduced by the pixel aperture and the active area of the pixel. Using the super-resolution factor and the attenuation introduced by the pixel stack, the pixel pitch that provides sufficient aliasing to achieve the desired super-resolution factor through super-resolution processing can be determined. Techniques for processing image data including aliasing captured by an array camera to synthesize images achieving a desired super-resolution factor in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Image Processing
[0061] The processing of low resolution images to obtain an super-resolution image in accordance with embodiments of the invention typically occurs in an array camera's image processing pipeline. In many embodiments, the image processing pipeline performs processes that register the low resolution images prior to performing super-resolution processes on the low resolution images. In several embodiments, the image processing pipeline also performs processes that eliminate problem pixels and compensate for parallax.
[0062] An image processing pipeline incorporating a super-resolution module for fusing information from low resolution images to obtain one or more synthesized high resolution images in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in FIG. 5 . In the illustrated image processing pipeline 120, pixel information is read out from the focal planes in the imager array 110 and is provided to a photometric conversion module 504 for photometric normalization. The photometric conversion module can perform any of a variety of photometric image processing processes including but not limited to one or more of photometric normalization, Black Level calculation and adjustments, vignetting correction, and lateral color correction. In several embodiments, the photometric conversion module also performs temperature normalization. In the illustrated embodiment, the inputs of the photometric normalization module are photometric calibration data and the captured low resolution images. The photometric calibration data is typically captured during an offline calibration process. The output of the photometric conversion module 504 is a set of photometrically normalized low resolution images. These photometrically normalized images are provided to a parallax detection module 508 and to a super-resolution module 514.
[0063] Prior to performing super-resolution processing, the image processing pipeline detects parallax that becomes more apparent as objects in the scene captured by the imager array approach the imager array. In the illustrated embodiment, parallax (or disparity) detection is performed using the parallax detection module 508. In several embodiments, the parallax detection module 508 generates an occlusion map for the occlusion zones around foreground objects. In many embodiments, the occlusion maps are binary maps created for pairs of low resolution images. In many embodiments, occlusion maps are generated to illustrate whether a point in the scene is visible in the field of view of a reference imager and/or whether points in the scene visible within the field of view of the reference imager are visible in the field of view of other imagers. In order to determine parallax, the parallax detection module 508 performs scene independent geometric corrections to the photometrically normalized low resolution images using geometric calibration data 506 obtained via an address conversion module 502. The parallax detection module can then compare the geometrically and photometrically corrected low resolution images to detect the presence of scene dependent geometric displacements between low resolution images. Information concerning these scene dependent geometric displacements can be referred to as parallax information and can be provided to the super-resolution module 514 in the form of scene dependent parallax corrections and occlusion maps. Processes for performing parallax detection are discussed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/691,666 entitled “Systems and Methods for Parallax Detection and Correction in Images Captured Using Array Cameras” to Venkataraman et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Designing a camera module to increase aliasing in captured low resolution images can complicate the process of determining the scene dependent parallax corrections. Processes that can be utilized to determine appropriate scene dependent parallax corrections in the presence of aliasing are discussed further below.
[0064] Geometric calibration (or scene-independent geometric correction) data 506 can be generated using an off line calibration process or a subsequent recalibration process. The scene-independent correction information, along with the scene-dependent geometric correction information (parallax) and occlusion maps, form the geometric correction information for the low resolution images. Once the parallax information has been generated, the parallax information and the photometrically normalized low resolution images can be provided to a super-resolution module 314 for use in the synthesis of one or more high resolution images 316.
[0065] In many embodiments, the super-resolution module 314 performs scene independent and scene dependent geometric corrections (i.e. geometric corrections) using the parallax information and geometric calibration data 306 obtained via the address conversion module 302. The photometrically normalized and geometrically registered low resolution images are then utilized in the synthesis of a high resolution image. The synthesized high resolution image 516 may then be fed to a downstream color processing module 564, which can be implemented using any standard color processing module configured to perform color correction and/or chroma level adjustment. In several embodiments, the color processing module performs operations including but not limited to one or more of white balance, color correction, gamma correction, and RGB to YUV correction.
[0066] In a number of embodiments, image processing pipelines in accordance with embodiments of the invention include a dynamic refocus module. The dynamic refocus module enables the user to specify a focal plane within a scene for use when synthesizing a high resolution image. In several embodiments, the dynamic refocus module builds an estimated high resolution depth map for the scene. The dynamic refocus module can use the high resolution depth map to blur the synthesized image to make portions of the scene that do not lie on the focal plane appear out of focus. In many embodiments, the super-resolution processing is limited to pixels lying on the focal plane and within a specified Z-range around the focal plane.
[0067] In several embodiments, the synthesized high resolution image 516 is encoded using any of a variety of standards based or proprietary encoding processes including but not limited to encoding the image in accordance with the JPEG standard developed by the Joint Photographic Experts Group. The encoded image can then be stored in accordance with a file format appropriate to the encoding technique used including but not limited to the JPEG Interchange Format (JIF), the JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF), or the Exchangeable image file format (Exif).
[0068] Processing pipelines similar to the processing pipeline illustrated in FIG. 5 and the super-resolution processing performed by such image processing pipelines are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/967,807 (the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference above). Although specific image processing pipelines are described above, super-resolution processes in accordance with embodiments of the invention can be used within any of a variety of image processing pipelines that register low resolution images prior to super-resolution processing in accordance with embodiments of the invention. The manner in which aliasing within the low resolution images can be utilized by super-resolution processes to increase the overall resolution of the synthesized image in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Super-Resolution Processing
[0069] In a super-resolution process, the images that are captured by the cameras that have fields of view that are at a sub-pixel offset relative to each other are used to synthesize a higher resolution image. When aliasing is introduced, the sub-pixel offsets in the fields of view of each of the cameras means that the aliasing is slightly different in each captured low resolution image. Therefore, the aliasing in each of the low resolution images provides useful information about high frequency image content that is exploited by the super-resolution process to increase the overall resolution of the synthesized high resolution image. However, increasing the aliasing in the low resolution images can complicate parallax detection and correction.
[0070] As is discussed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/691,666, disparity between captured low resolution images can be determined by searching, in some robust manner, for similar pixels in pairs of images. However, such searches can be quickly confused in flat regions and in regions with repeating patterns or textures, as the pixel (or groups of pixels) under consideration in one camera can have multiple matches in another. Such spurious matches can be disambiguated to some extent by the use of scene information (prior) and/or pyramidal search techniques. However, such techniques typically fail in the presence of aliasing effects. Aliasing is a result of insufficient spatial sampling frequency in each camera, and can manifest itself differently in the images captured by the different cameras. As a result, pixel or patch matching (i.e. matching portions of images) using pyramidal techniques can also fail. Image processing pipelines and parallax detection processes in accordance with embodiments of the invention utilize the differences in high frequency information in each of the captured low resolution images, to establish pixel correspondence between the captured low resolution images in a way that accommodates the aliasing in each captured image. In a number of embodiments, pixel correspondence in the presence of aliasing is determined using an approach that can be referred to as “hypothesized fusion”. Hypothesized fusion in accordance with embodiments of the invention is discussed further below.
Hypothesized Fusion
[0071] In many embodiments, hypothesized fusion processes are utilized to determine pixel correspondences in the presence of aliasing. Based upon the pixel correspondences, super-resolution processes (such as those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/967,807) can be performed that extract higher frequency content from the aliased frequencies in the images. However, in the absence of sub-pixel registration information, this can be non-trivial. As mentioned earlier, in the presence of aliasing, it is difficult to recover the depth of each pixel to obtain pixel correspondences among the various images. To circumvent this problem, multiple high resolution images or high resolution image patches can be obtained by fusing some or all of the captured low resolution images at various hypothesized depths. Only at the correct depth, will the fused high resolution image (or part of it) represent an image of the captured scene. Therefore, the depth of a point in a scene can be determined by fusing portions of low resolution images that contain the point in the scene at different hypothesized depths and selecting the depth of the point in the scene as the hypothesized depth at which the fused high resolution image most closely matches the scene. As is discussed further below, an array camera typically does not possess a baseline or ground truth concerning the scene. Therefore, the extent to which the fused high resolution image corresponds to the scene can be determined in any of a variety of ways. In several embodiments, the fused high resolution image is forward mapped using a process similar to that utilized using super-resolution processing and the resulting low resolution forward mapped images compared to the captured low resolution images. In many embodiments, the variance in pixel stacks in the fused high resolution image is used to indicate the similarity of the fused high resolution image to the scene. In a number of embodiments, multiple subsets of the captured low resolution images are fused to create multiple fused high resolution images or high resolution image portions and the multiple fused high resolution images or high resolution image portions are compared. In other embodiments, any of variety of techniques can be used to evaluate the similarity of one or more fused high resolution images or fused high resolution image portions to the scene captured in the low resolution images.
[0072] A process for performing hypothesized fusion in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in FIG. 6 . Initially, the process 600 involves capturing (602) multiple images of a scene. Due to the difficulty of ascertaining the parallax depth in aliased regions the process hypothesizes (604) a depth “d”. Different embodiments may involve hypothesizing the depth ‘d’ in aliased regions using different measures and metrics. In one embodiment, the hypothesized depth may be an ordered list based on the ‘n’ closest pixels with high confidence depth maps. Given the depth “d”, the pixel correspondence between registered captured images becomes fixed. The pixels from the corresponding images can then be mapped to a high resolution grid in an attempt to synthesize (606) an high resolution image. As is discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/967,807, the resulting high resolution image is a representation of an image of the scene that is being captured. The process of capturing images using the focal planes in the imager array can be considered to involve transformation of the scene (which should correspond to the high resolution image of the scene) through a forward mapping process that can be modeled using appropriate transfer functions. The specific forward mapping (608) is dependent upon the construction of the array camera module. The low resolution image estimates produced by applying the forward mapping to the synthesized high resolution image can be compared (609) to the captured low resolution images and a matching score determined and saved. The process then determines (610) whether there are additional hypothesized depths to test. If there are, then a new hypothesized depth is used and the process repeats. When matching scores have been obtained at all of the hypothesized depths, the hypothesized depth that yields the best matching score can be selected as the final depth estimate. In many embodiments, additional termination conditions can be utilized when comparing the forward mapped low resolution images to the captured low resolution images. For example, if a good match of the aliased region is found, then the loop can terminate and the hypothesized depth “d” determined to be a good depth and the pixel correspondence between the captured images is confirmed.
[0073] An alternative to performing forward mapping of a fused or super-resolved high resolution image at different hypothesized depths to determine the extent to which the fused or super-resolved high resolution image corresponds with the scene captured by a set of low resolution images is to instead look at the characteristics of the pixels that are fused to create a portion of the high resolution image. In many embodiments, the number of captured low resolution images is sufficiently large so as to result in pixel stacks in the fused high resolution image. At the correct depth, the same or very similar pixels should be fused onto the same pixel locations in the higher resolution grid. Therefore, the similarity of the pixels in pixel stacks can be utilized as a measure of the similarity of a portion of a fused high resolution image to the scene captured in a set of low resolution images. In many embodiments, the extent to which a portion of a fused high resolution image at a specific hypothesized depth matches the scene captured in a set of low resolution images is determined based upon the variance of pixels within pixels stacks in the portion of the fused high resolution image.
[0074] A process for determining the depth of a point in a scene captured by a set of low resolution images by fusing portions of high resolution images at different hypothesized depths and selecting a depth based upon the variance in the pixel stacks of the fused high resolution image portions at each hypothesized depth in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in FIG. 6A . The process 650 includes selecting (652) a hypothesized pixel depth, fusing (654) portions of low resolution images to generate a portion of an high resolution image at the selected hypothesized pixel depth, and determining (656) a matching score based on at least the variance of pixels within pixels stacks within the fused high resolution image portion. The process repeats until a determination (658) is made that a matching score has been determined at each hypothesized depth of interest and then the hypothesized depth at which the fused high resolution image portion best matches the scene captured by the low resolution images is determined based upon the hypothesized depth that yields the highest matching score. In many embodiments, additional termination conditions can be utilized when comparing the forward mapped low resolution images to the captured low resolution images. For example, if a matching score exceeding a predetermined threshold is obtained then the process can terminate and the hypothesized depth that yielded the matching score selected as the appropriate depth.
[0075] Although a specific processes are illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 6A , any of a variety of processes can be utilized to determine pixel correspondence between multiple images of a scene that include aliasing in accordance with embodiments of the invention. In many embodiments, the process of verifying hypothesized depths can be performed by generating multiple fused images using low resolution images captured by different sets of focal planes within the array camera module. Processes for verifying hypothesized depths using multiple fused images in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Hypothesized Fusion Using High Resolution Image Comparison
[0076] When performing hypothesized fusion, determining the “correctness” of the fused image would be greatly assisted by knowledge of the scene content or a ground truth aliasing-free image as reference. In the absence of either, array cameras in accordance with many embodiments of the invention partition the focal planes in the imager array into at least two sets, and form a separate fused high resolution image using the low resolution images captured by each set of focal planes. Since aliasing effects are varied in the different images, at incorrect depths, the fused high resolution images are likely to be considerably different. At the correct depth, high resolution information obtained from the aliasing in the low resolution images increases the similarity between a synthesized high resolution image and the scene. Accordingly, two or more high resolution images fused using correct depths will have a significantly higher level of similarity relative to sets of high resolution images fused using incorrect depth assumptions. By comparing high resolution images formed at various depths from the low resolution images captured by each set of focal planes, their mutual similarities form a good measure of “correctness” of the fused images, thus providing a depth estimate for the aliased regions.
[0077] A process for performing hypothesized fusion involving the generation of two fused images in accordance with embodiments of the invention is illustrated in FIG. 7 . The process 700 utilizes low resolution images captured by two sets of focal planes in the imager array. In several embodiments, the two sets of focal planes are non-distinct (i.e. some focal planes are included in both sets) such that there is considerable spatial overlap between the camera viewpoints across the two sets of low resolution images. Assuming (702) a particular depth d for one or more points in the scene, the corresponding pixels in each set of low resolution images are fused (704) onto a higher resolution grid generated from a chosen reference viewpoint using known camera calibration information. A simple hole filling mechanism can then be used to fill (706) holes at locations in the fused images where no pixels converge. The two high resolution images are then compared (708) and a robust cost C(i, d) is computed as the error in pixel match (at each location indexed by i) in the two fused images formed using a hypothesized depth d. For each pixel i, the depth is determined (710) as a depth d, for which the error in matching C(i, d) is the least over all the sampled depths. This provides a depth map for all pixels in the image, even in regions with significant variation amongst the low resolution images due to aliasing. In other embodiments, any of a variety of termination conditions can be utilized including (but not limited to) terminating the analysis of different hypothesized depths when a matching score exceeding a threshold is determined.
[0078] Although specific processes for determining the most likely hypothesized depth of a pixel in a high resolution image are discussed above with reference to FIG. 7 , any of a variety of processes can be utilized involving comparison of two or more fused high resolution images generated using low resolution images captured by sets of focal planes within an imager array in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Processes for partitioning the focal planes in an imager array into sets of focal planes when performing hypothesized fusion in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Partitioning Focal Planes in an Array Camera Module
[0079] In an array camera module, cameras can be partitioned into two or more groups of cameras (irrespective of the particular frequency range captured by the cameras). In a number of embodiments, cameras capturing information in a particular frequency range (color) can be partitioned into two or more groups of cameras for the purpose of performing hypothesized fusion. In many embodiments, the complexity of hypothesized fusion can be reduced by only considering the Green cameras. The spatial shift between cameras causes phase shifts in the aliased frequencies resulting in aliased regions in images that appear considerably different between captured low resolution images of a scene. As discussed earlier, the goal of selecting two or more sets of cameras is to exploit these dissimilarities to fuse similar images at the correct depth hypothesis for each pixel or region within a high resolution image. That is to say, when pixels from each of the sets of low resolution images are placed on a higher resolution grid, the reduction in aliasing effects enables the reconstruction of very similar images for each set (assuming the correct depth hypotheses are used). The difference between the fused images is typically primarily related to the errors in the depth hypotheses.
[0080] In many embodiments, each set of low resolution images is used to generate a high resolution image from the viewpoint of a common reference camera. Depending upon the specific imager array used to capture the low resolution images, the reference camera may be located at the center of the camera or in a location offset from the center of the camera. In many embodiments, the high resolution images can be synthesized from a virtual viewpoint. The manner in which the focal planes in an array camera module are partitioned typically depends upon the number of focal planes in the array camera module. In many embodiments, the hypothesized fusion process attempts to construct fused images that are as similar as possible. Since the fusion step attempts to achieve sub-pixel accuracy, errors in camera calibration can lead to differences between the high resolution images created by fusing the low resolution images captured by the sets of focal planes. In many embodiments, the partitioning is performed so that a number of focal planes are common to each set.
[0081] Hypothesized fusion can be performed by partitioning the focal planes in an array camera module into two disjoint sets. In a number of embodiments, the focal planes are partitioned into two sets that divide the focal planes in the camera array horizontally, vertically or in any of the diagonal directions. Forming two disjoint sets of cameras, however, is likely to result in a smaller number of focal planes in each set of focal planes (compared to forming overlapping sets of focal planes). With few cameras, a smaller level of magnification can be achieved without leaving large holes that need to be interpolated. Therefore, depending upon the number of focal planes in the imager array, partitioning the focal planes into disjoint sets can result in retaining much of the aliasing effects.
[0082] The location of the reference camera or viewpoint can also be an important consideration when partitioning the focal planes in an imager array. Since the fused images are formed using the reference camera as the viewpoint, it is useful to select the viewpoint of an actual camera (as opposed to a virtual viewpoint) as the reference the reference camera in both sets. Additionally, advantages can be obtained by selecting the sets of focal planes such that each set has considerable coverage on any given side (above, below, left and right) of the reference camera. Therefore, in many embodiments each set includes a focal plane above, below, to the left, and to the right of the reference camera. This increases the likelihood that the pixels placed on the higher resolution grid are similarly distributed in either set. At the same time, selecting the sets in this way can minimize errors associated with occlusion zones and increase the likelihood that whatever errors remain are present in each of the fused high resolution images.
[0083] The selection of cameras based on the above considerations, typically depends upon the number and grid configuration of the focal planes in an imager array (including the location of color filters within the array camera module), the scene being imaged, and the requirements of specific applications. In several embodiments, a determination is made dynamically concerning the manner in which to partition the focal planes based upon sensor information, and/or the captured low resolution images. In other embodiments, predetermined partitions are utilized.
[0084] The partitioning of focal planes in an array camera module in accordance with embodiments of the invention is illustrated in FIGS. 8A-8C . A grid of cameras in an array camera module is conceptually illustrated in In FIG. 8A . The array camera module includes a 5×5 configuration of cameras including 6 Blue cameras, 13 Green cameras, and 6 Red cameras. The Green cameras in the array camera module illustrated in FIG. 8A can be partitioned into the two sets illustrated in FIGS. 8B and 8C . The five central Green cameras are common to both sets and the additional four cameras in each set are distinct to the set. Both sets include the central Green camera, which is typically used as a reference camera when synthesizing high resolution images using a 5×5 array. In arrays that don't have a central imager, a Green camera proximate the center of the array is typically utilized as the reference camera.
[0085] Although the partitioned sets illustrated in FIGS. 8B and 8C include the same numbers of cameras, in many embodiments the sets can include different numbers of cameras. Furthermore, hypothesized fusion is not limited to using a single type of camera from within the array camera module. The manner in which hypothesized fusion can be performed using low resolution images captured by partitioned sets of focal planes within an imager array in accordance with embodiments of the invention is discussed further below.
Fusion with Depth Hypothesis
[0086] Based upon the partitioning of focal planes, the low resolution images captured by the focal planes in each set can be fused onto a high resolution grid. The process of fusing the low resolution images onto the high resolution grid utilizes camera calibration data determined a priori. Placing pixels from a focal plane to a high resolution grid from the viewpoint of the reference camera involves accounting for the relative baselines of the focal planes, the focal length (can be assumed fixed) as well as the depth of the point whose projected pixel is being considered. Initially, the actual depth or distance of the point from the camera plane is unknown. To solve for depth, a list of possible depth hypotheses can be utilized. For each depth d in the list, pixels from each low resolution image in the appropriate set can be placed onto the higher resolution grid taking into account the magnification amount being considered. Since the focal planes within each set capture the same image from a slightly shifted viewpoint, the pixels may be sub-pixel shifted and, hence, may be placed at a slightly different location in the high resolution grid. The final fused image is then formed by some form of interpolation that produces a regularly sampled grid from the randomly sampled observations. Given enough samples arising out of a sufficient number of low resolution images in each set, simple interpolation schemes such as kernel regression can be employed.
[0087] Performing fusion using each set of low resolution images provides high resolution images or portions of high resolution images for each hypothesized depth. At incorrect depths, the pixel placements can be expected to be erroneous. As a result, images are obtained that are not really representative of the captured scenes. This is especially true of regions including higher levels of aliasing. As mentioned earlier, the measure of “correctness” is calculated by the similarity of the high resolution images produced by each of the sets of low resolution images. Where focal planes are common to both sets, the low resolution images captured by the common focal planes contribute equally to both the high resolution images at the correct as well as incorrect hypothesized depths. However, at incorrect depths, a sufficiently large number of distinct cameras with quite varied aliasing effects produce a lower match between image regions obtained from different sets of images. Since each of these cameras sample differently shifted images, the samples at any given incorrect depth hypothesis are inaccurately placed on the high resolution grid, increasing the differences between the fused high resolution images created using each set. At the correct depth hypothesis for any given region, when the samples can be expected to be placed correctly, both sets produce images that are sufficiently free of aliasing to achieve a threshold level of similarity. Employing a proper measure of similarity over the entire hypothesized depths, it is possible to estimate the actual depth of an aliased region in the captured low resolution images. Different locations in the image may produce best matches at different depth hypotheses. Choosing the best matches at each location allows the production of a depth estimate for each pixel, and, hence, a depth map for the entire image. In many embodiments, the computational complexity of performing hypothesized fusion can be reduced by only performing hypothesized fusion in regions where a threshold level of aliasing is present. In several embodiments, the computational complexity of performing hypothesized fusion can also be reduced by utilizing information concerning the depth of an adjacent region or pixel to commence the search for a correct depth. When a threshold level of similarity is achieved, a depth can be selected. In this way, the number of depth hypotheses tested by the process can be reduced in regions having similar depths. Processes for determining the similarity of regions of fused high resolution images when performing hypothesized fusion in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Determining Similarity
[0088] Estimating the correct depth at any given location during hypothesized fusion relies on an ability to accurately measure the similarity between fused high resolution images. In a number of embodiments, image patches are used to determine local similarities. Comparisons of portions or patches of images provide robustness to the presence of noise, which can be expected to corrupt the captured low resolution images. Further, uses of small image portions can account for the local content surrounding a pixel under consideration when comparing fused high resolution images, thereby avoiding spurious matches. For each pixel in the high resolution grid where a pixel from the reference camera is positioned, a M×N patch is formed with the pixel of interest at its center. This is done for images from each set. Where the focal planes are partitioned into two sets, these image portions p1,i, and p2,i are then compared using a measure of their difference. In a number of embodiments, an L1 or an L2 norm is used to measure the difference although other measures appropriate to the requirements of a specific application can also be utilized. Note that this can be done for each portion in the high resolution image, and for each hypothesized depth. Mathematically, the cost C(i, d) is obtained using the following expression:
C(i,d)=∥p1,i−p2,i∥2 (2)
C(i,d)=∥p1,i−p2,i∥2 (2)
[0089] Once such a cost is computed for all hypothesized depths, the depth at each location of interest (e.g. each pixel from the reference camera) can be computed as
[0090]
[0091] Although there exists many cost functions that may be utilized to compare two image portions or patches for similarity, the L2 norm provides a simple yet effective measure of similarity appropriate to many applications. Experimental evidence that illustrates the recovery of high frequency information from low resolution images in which aliasing is introduced using pixel apertures using hypothesized fusion processes, similar to the hypothesized fusion processes described above, is discussed below.
Recovery of High Frequency Information
[0092] super-resolution processes in accordance with embodiments of the invention can utilize aliasing within captured images of a scene to recover high frequency information. The increase in resolution of the resulting synthesized images can be appreciated by comparing images synthesized from images captured using imager arrays constructed to minimize aliasing and images synthesized from images captured using imager arrays constructed to introduce aliasing into the captured image (e.g. by using microlenses that create pixel apertures).
[0093] A simulation of the resolution improvement that can be obtained by introducing aliasing into captured images in accordance with embodiments of the invention is illustrated in FIGS. 9A and 9B . FIG. 9A is a first super-resolution image 900 synthesized using images captured by a 5×5 array of VGA resolution imagers, where each pixel in the imager has a pixel pitch of 2.2 μm. FIG. 9B is a second super-resolution image 902 synthesized by simulating images captured by a 5×5 array of VGA resolution images, where each pixel has a 2.2 μm pixel pitch, but is sampled in a 1.4 μm area due to the use of microlenses that do not span the full 2.2 μm pixel pitch to create a pixel aperture. It can be noted, that a similar effect in terms of reduction of blur can be achieved by using a smaller active area than the full span of the pixel pitch. The use of microlens pixel apertures in this way increases the aliasing in the captured low resolution images. As can be appreciated in a corresponding region 904 in each image, the ability of the super-resolution processing to recover high frequency information is enhanced due to the increase in aliasing in the captured images caused by the pixel apertures. Super-resolution processes may, however, rely on hypothesized fusion to provide correct depth information.
[0094] The size of the microlenses and therefore the implied sizes of the gaps between the microlenses is a tradeoff between increased aliasing and decreased sensitivity. Assuming square pixels and therefore square microlenses the area covered by the microlenses is proportional to the square of the pixel pitch. An additional consideration is the reduction of the pixel stack and therefore a concomitant reduction in the cross-talk between adjacent pixels. The removal of the color filter from the pixel stack has the potential of reducing the pixel stack height by 30%. In many embodiments, the consequent reduction in cross-talk through pixel stack height reduction results in increased sensitivity and can be traded-off for increased aliasing. Similar issues are faced by pixels including microlenses that are not square.
[0095] Although specific imager resolutions and pixel sizes are described above, as can readily be appreciated the imager resolution, the pixel sizes, and the apertures used to introduce aliasing into the captured images can be selected as appropriate to the requirements of a specific application in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
[0096] While the above description contains many specific embodiments of the invention, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an example of one embodiment thereof. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An imager array, comprising:
a plurality of focal planes, where each of the plurality of focal planes comprises a two dimensional arrangement of pixels having at least two pixels in each dimension having a pixel pitch and each of the plurality of focal planes is contained within a region of the imager array that does not contain pixels from another one of the plurality of focal planes;
control circuitry configured to control the capture of image information by the at least two pixels in each dimension within each of the plurality of focal planes; and
sampling circuitry configured to convert pixel outputs into digital pixel data; wherein the pixels in the plurality of focal planes comprise a pixel stack including a microlens and an active area, where light incident on the surface of the microlens is focused onto the active area by the microlens and the active area samples the incident light to capture image information;
wherein the pixel stack of each pixel in the at least two pixels in each dimension of each of the plurality of focal planes defines a pixel area and includes a pixel aperture, where the size of the pixel apertures is smaller than the pixel area and pixel stacks of each of the at least two pixels in each dimension of each of the plurality of focal planes are arranged to have a ratio of active area to pixel pitch that causes at least a certain amount of desired aliasing in the image information captured by the sampling circuitry.
2. The imager array of claim 1, wherein the pixel aperture of each pixel in the at least two pixels in each dimension of each of the plurality of focal planes is formed by a microlens that is smaller than the pixel area.
3. The imager array of claim 2, wherein gaps exist between adjacent microlenses in the pixel stacks of adjacent pixels in the at least two pixels in each dimension of each of the plurality of focal planes.
4. The imager array of claim 3, wherein light is prevented from entering the pixel stacks through the gaps between the adjacent microlenses by a light blocking material.
5. The imager array of claim 4, wherein photoresist is located in the gaps between the adjacent microlenses.
6. The imager array of claim 2, wherein the amount of aliasing in the image information captured by one of the plurality of focal planes is greater than the amount of aliasing that would be present were the microlens to occupy the entire pixel area defined by the pixel stack.
7. The imager array of claim 2, wherein the pixel stack of each pixel in the at least two pixels in each dimension of each of the plurality of focal planes further comprises an oxide layer and the microlens sits atop the oxide layer.
8. The imager array of claim 7, wherein the pixel stack of each pixel in the at least two pixels in each dimension of each of the plurality of focal planes includes a color filter.
9. The imager array of claim 8, wherein the color filter in the pixel stack of each pixel in the at least two pixels in each dimension of a one of the plurality of focal planes is the same.
10. The imager array of claim 8, wherein the color filters in the pixel stacks of the pixels in the at least two pixels in each dimension of a one of the plurality of focal planes form a Bayer filter pattern.
11. The imager array of claim 7, wherein the pixel stack of each pixel in the at least two pixels in each dimension of a one of the plurality of focal planes does not include a color filter.
12. The imager array of claim 7, wherein the pixel stack of each pixel in the at least two pixels in each dimension of each of the plurality of focal planes includes a nitride passivation layer and a bottom oxide layer that provides support and isolation for metal interconnects.
13. The imager array of claim 1, wherein the pixel aperture of each pixel in the at least two pixels in each dimension of each of the plurality of focal planes is formed using at least one light blocking material.
14. An array camera module, comprising:
an imager array configured to capture light field image data, comprising:
a plurality of focal planes, where each of the plurality of focal planes comprises a two dimensional arrangement of pixels having at least two pixels in each dimension and each of the plurality of focal planes is contained within a region of the imager array that does not contain pixels from another one of the plurality of focal planes;
control circuitry configured to control the capture of image information from the at least two pixels in each dimension of the two dimensional arrangement of pixels within each of the plurality of focal planes; and
sampling circuitry configured to convert pixel outputs from the at least two pixels in each dimension of the two dimensional arrangement of pixels within each of the plurality of focal planes into digital pixel data;
wherein each pixel from the at least two pixels in each dimension of the two dimensional arrangement of pixels within each of the plurality of focal planes comprise a pixel stack including a microlens and an active area, where light incident on the surface of the microlens is focused onto the active area by the microlens and the active area samples the incident light to capture image information;
wherein the pixel stack in each pixel defines a pixel area and includes a pixel aperture, where the size of the pixel aperture is smaller than the pixel area;
an optic array of lens stacks, where each of the lens stacks in the optical array form an image including aliasing on a particular one of the plurality of focal planes; and
wherein pixel stacks of each of the at least two pixels in each dimension of each of the plurality of focal planes are arranged to have a ratio of active area to pixel pitch that causes at least a certain amount of desired aliasing in the image information captured by the sampling circuitry.
15. The array camera module of claim 14, wherein the pixel aperture is formed by a microlens that is smaller than the pixel area.
16. The array camera module of claim 15, wherein gaps exist between adjacent microlenses in the pixel stacks of adjacent pixels in a particular one of the plurality of focal planes.
17. The array camera module of claim 16, wherein light is prevented from entering the pixel stacks of the at least two pixels in each dimension of the two dimensional arrangement of pixels within each of the plurality of focal planes through the gaps between the microlenses by a light blocking material.
18. The array camera module of claim 17, wherein photoresist is located in the gaps between the microlenses.
19. The array camera module of claim 15, wherein the amount of aliasing in images captured by a one of the plurality of focal planes is greater than the amount of aliasing that would be present were the microlens of the at least two pixels in each dimension of the two dimensional arrangement of pixels within each of the plurality of focal planes to occupy the entire pixel area defined by the pixel stack.
Patent Citations (883)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4124798(A) | 1978-11-01 | Thompson | Applicant |
| US4198646(A) | 1980-04-01 | Alexander et al. | Applicant |
| US4323925(A) | 1982-04-01 | Abell et al. | Applicant |
| US4460449(A) | 1984-07-01 | Montalbano | Applicant |
| US4467365(A) | 1984-08-01 | Murayama et al. | Applicant |
| US4652909(A) | 1987-03-01 | Glenn | Applicant |
| US4899060(A) | 1990-02-01 | Lischke | Applicant |
| US5005083(A) | 1991-04-01 | Grage | Applicant |
| US5070414(A) | 1991-12-01 | Tsutsumi | Applicant |
| US5144448(A) | 1992-09-01 | Hornbaker | Applicant |
| US5157499(A) | 1992-10-01 | Oguma et al. | Applicant |
| US5325449(A) | 1994-06-01 | Burt | Applicant |
| US5327125(A) | 1994-07-01 | Iwase et al. | Applicant |
| US5488674(A) | 1996-01-01 | Burt | Applicant |
| US5629524(A) | 1997-05-01 | Stettner et al. | Applicant |
| US5808350(A) | 1998-09-01 | Jack et al. | Applicant |
| US5832312(A) | 1998-11-01 | Rieger et al. | Applicant |
| US5880691(A) | 1999-03-01 | Fossum et al. | Applicant |
| US5911008(A) | 1999-06-01 | Hamada et al. | Applicant |
| US5933190(A) | 1999-08-01 | Dierickx et al. | Applicant |
| US5973844(A) | 1999-10-01 | Burger | Applicant |
| US6002743(A) | 1999-12-01 | Telymonde | Applicant |
| US6005607(A) | 1999-12-01 | Uomori et al. | Applicant |
| US6034690(A) | 2000-03-01 | Gallery et al. | Applicant |
| US6069351(A) | 2000-05-01 | Mack | Applicant |
| US6069365(A) | 2000-05-01 | Chow et al. | Applicant |
| US6097394(A) | 2000-08-01 | Levoy et al. | Applicant |
| US6124974(A) | 2000-09-01 | Burger | Applicant |
| US6130786(A) | 2000-10-01 | Osawa et al. | Applicant |
| US6137100(A) | 2000-10-01 | Fossum et al. | Applicant |
| US6137535(A) | 2000-10-01 | Meyers | Applicant |
| US6141048(A) | 2000-10-01 | Meyers | Applicant |
| US6160909(A) | 2000-12-01 | Melen | Applicant |
| US6163414(A) | 2000-12-01 | Kikuchi et al. | Applicant |
| US6172352(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Liu et al. | Applicant |
| US6175379(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Uomori et al. | Applicant |
| US6205241(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Melen | Applicant |
| US6239909(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Hayashi et al. | Applicant |
| US6340994(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Margulis et al. | Applicant |
| US6358862(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Ireland et al. | Applicant |
| US6443579(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Myers et al. | Applicant |
| US6476805(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Shum et al. | Applicant |
| US6477260(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Shimomura | Applicant |
| US6502097(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Chan et al. | Applicant |
| US6525302(B2) | 2003-02-01 | Dowski, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US6563537(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Kawamura et al. | Applicant |
| US6571466(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Glenn et al. | Applicant |
| US6603513(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Berezin | Applicant |
| US6611289(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Yu | Applicant |
| US6627896(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Hashimoto et al. | Applicant |
| US6628330(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Lin | Applicant |
| US6635941(B2) | 2003-10-01 | Suda | Applicant |
| US6639596(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Shum et al. | Applicant |
| US6647142(B1) | 2003-11-01 | Beardsley | Applicant |
| US6657218(B2) | 2003-12-01 | Noda | Applicant |
| US6671399(B1) | 2003-12-01 | Berestov | Applicant |
| US6750904(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Lambert | Applicant |
| US6765617(B1) | 2004-07-01 | Tangen et al. | Applicant |
| US6771833(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Edgar | Applicant |
| US6774941(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Boisvert et al. | Applicant |
| US6788338(B1) | 2004-09-01 | Dinev | Applicant |
| US6795253(B2) | 2004-09-01 | Shinohara | Applicant |
| US6819328(B1) | 2004-11-01 | Moriwaki et al. | Applicant |
| US6819358(B1) | 2004-11-01 | Kagle et al. | Applicant |
| US6879735(B1) | 2005-04-01 | Portniaguine et al. | Applicant |
| US6897454(B2) | 2005-05-01 | Sasaki et al. | Applicant |
| US6903770(B1) | 2005-06-01 | Kobayashi et al. | Applicant |
| US6909121(B2) | 2005-06-01 | Nishikawa | Applicant |
| US6927922(B2) | 2005-08-01 | George et al. | Applicant |
| US6958862(B1) | 2005-10-01 | Joseph | Applicant |
| US7015954(B1) | 2006-03-01 | Foote et al. | Applicant |
| US7085409(B2) | 2006-08-01 | Sawhney | Applicant |
| US7161614(B1) | 2007-01-01 | Yamashita et al. | Applicant |
| US7199348(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US7206449(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Raskar et al. | Applicant |
| US7235785(B2) | 2007-06-01 | Hornback et al. | Applicant |
| US7262799(B2) | 2007-08-01 | Suda | Applicant |
| US7292735(B2) | 2007-11-01 | Blake et al. | Applicant |
| US7295697(B1) | 2007-11-01 | Satoh | Applicant |
| US7369165(B2) | 2008-05-01 | Bosco et al. | Applicant |
| US7391572(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Jacobowitz et al. | Applicant |
| US7408725(B2) | 2008-08-01 | Sato | Applicant |
| US7425984(B2) | 2008-09-01 | Chen | Applicant |
| US7496293(B2) | 2009-02-01 | Shamir et al. | Applicant |
| US7564019(B2) | 2009-07-01 | Olsen | Applicant |
| US7606484(B1) | 2009-10-01 | Richards et al. | Applicant |
| US7620265(B1) | 2009-11-01 | Wolff | Applicant |
| US7633511(B2) | 2009-12-01 | Shum et al. | Applicant |
| US7639435(B2) | 2009-12-01 | Chiang et al. | Applicant |
| US7646549(B2) | 2010-01-01 | Zalevsky et al. | Applicant |
| US7657090(B2) | 2010-02-01 | Omatsu et al. | Applicant |
| US7675080(B2) | 2010-03-01 | Boettiger | Applicant |
| US7675681(B2) | 2010-03-01 | Tomikawa et al. | Applicant |
| US7706634(B2) | 2010-04-01 | Schmitt et al. | Applicant |
| US7723662(B2) | 2010-05-01 | Levoy et al. | Applicant |
| US7738013(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Galambos et al. | Applicant |
| US7741620(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Doering et al. | Applicant |
| US7782364(B2) | 2010-08-01 | Smith | Applicant |
| US7826153(B2) | 2010-11-01 | Hong | Applicant |
| US7840067(B2) | 2010-11-01 | Shen et al. | Applicant |
| US7912673(B2) | 2011-03-01 | Hébert et al. | Applicant |
| US7973834(B2) | 2011-07-01 | Yang | Applicant |
| US7986018(B2) | 2011-07-01 | Rennie | Applicant |
| US7990447(B2) | 2011-08-01 | Honda et al. | Applicant |
| US8000498(B2) | 2011-08-01 | Shih et al. | Applicant |
| US8013904(B2) | 2011-09-01 | Tan et al. | Applicant |
| US8027531(B2) | 2011-09-01 | Wilburn et al. | Applicant |
| US8044994(B2) | 2011-10-01 | Vetro et al. | Applicant |
| US8077245(B2) | 2011-12-01 | Adamo et al. | Applicant |
| US8098297(B2) | 2012-01-01 | Crisan et al. | Applicant |
| US8098304(B2) | 2012-01-01 | Pinto et al. | Applicant |
| US8106949(B2) | 2012-01-01 | Tan et al. | Applicant |
| US8126279(B2) | 2012-02-01 | Marcellin et al. | Applicant |
| US8130120(B2) | 2012-03-01 | Kawabata et al. | Applicant |
| US8131097(B2) | 2012-03-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US8149323(B2) | 2012-04-01 | Li | Applicant |
| US8164629(B1) | 2012-04-01 | Zhang | Applicant |
| US8169486(B2) | 2012-05-01 | Corcoran et al. | Applicant |
| US8180145(B2) | 2012-05-01 | Wu et al. | Applicant |
| US8189065(B2) | 2012-05-01 | Georgiev et al. | Applicant |
| US8189089(B1) | 2012-05-01 | Georgiev | Applicant |
| US8194296(B2) | 2012-06-01 | Compton | Applicant |
| US8212914(B2) | 2012-07-01 | Chiu | Applicant |
| US8213711(B2) | 2012-07-01 | Tam | Applicant |
| US8231814(B2) | 2012-07-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US8242426(B2) | 2012-08-01 | Ward et al. | Applicant |
| US8244027(B2) | 2012-08-01 | Takahashi | Applicant |
| US8244058(B1) | 2012-08-01 | Intwala et al. | Applicant |
| US8254668(B2) | 2012-08-01 | Mashitani et al. | Applicant |
| US8279325(B2) | 2012-10-01 | Pitts et al. | Applicant |
| US8280194(B2) | 2012-10-01 | Wong et al. | Applicant |
| US8289409(B2) | 2012-10-01 | Chang | Applicant |
| US8289440(B2) | 2012-10-01 | Pitts et al. | Applicant |
| US8290358(B1) | 2012-10-01 | Georgiev | Applicant |
| US8294099(B2) | 2012-10-01 | Blackwell, Jr. | Applicant |
| US8305456(B1) | 2012-11-01 | McMahon | Applicant |
| US8315476(B1) | 2012-11-01 | Georgiev et al. | Applicant |
| US8345144(B1) | 2013-01-01 | Georgiev et al. | Applicant |
| US8360574(B2) | 2013-01-01 | Ishak et al. | Applicant |
| US8400555(B1) | 2013-03-01 | Georgiev | Applicant |
| US8406562(B2) | 2013-03-01 | Bassi et al. | Applicant |
| US8411146(B2) | 2013-04-01 | Twede | Applicant |
| US8446492(B2) | 2013-05-01 | Nakano et al. | Applicant |
| US8456517(B2) | 2013-06-01 | Mor et al. | Applicant |
| US8493496(B2) | 2013-07-01 | Freedman et al. | Applicant |
| US8514491(B2) | 2013-08-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US8541730(B2) | 2013-09-01 | Inuiya | Applicant |
| US8542933(B2) | 2013-09-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US8553093(B2) | 2013-10-01 | Wong et al. | Applicant |
| US8559756(B2) | 2013-10-01 | Georgiev et al. | Applicant |
| US8565547(B2) | 2013-10-01 | Strandemar | Applicant |
| US8576302(B2) | 2013-11-01 | Yoshikawa | Applicant |
| US8577183(B2) | 2013-11-01 | Robinson | Applicant |
| US8581995(B2) | 2013-11-01 | Lin et al. | Applicant |
| US8619082(B1) | 2013-12-01 | Ciurea | Applicant |
| US8648918(B2) | 2014-02-01 | Kauker et al. | Applicant |
| US8655052(B2) | 2014-02-01 | Spooner et al. | Applicant |
| US8682107(B2) | 2014-03-01 | Yoon et al. | Applicant |
| US8687087(B2) | 2014-04-01 | Pertsel et al. | Applicant |
| US8692893(B2) | 2014-04-01 | McMahon | Applicant |
| US8773536(B1) | 2014-07-01 | Zhang | Applicant |
| US8780113(B1) | 2014-07-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US8804255(B2) | 2014-08-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US8830375(B2) | 2014-09-01 | Ludwig | Applicant |
| US8831367(B2) | 2014-09-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US8842201(B2) | 2014-09-01 | Tajiri | Applicant |
| US8854462(B2) | 2014-10-01 | Herbin et al. | Applicant |
| US8861089(B2) | 2014-10-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US8866912(B2) | 2014-10-01 | Mullis | Applicant |
| US8866920(B2) | 2014-10-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US8866951(B2) | 2014-10-01 | Keelan | Applicant |
| US8878950(B2) | 2014-11-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US8885059(B1) | 2014-11-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US8885922(B2) | 2014-11-01 | Kobayashi et al. | Applicant |
| US8896594(B2) | 2014-11-01 | Xiong et al. | Applicant |
| US8896719(B1) | 2014-11-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US8902321(B2) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US8928793(B2) | 2015-01-01 | McMahon | Applicant |
| US8977038(B2) | 2015-03-01 | Tian et al. | Applicant |
| US9001226(B1) | 2015-04-01 | Ng et al. | Applicant |
| US9019426(B2) | 2015-04-01 | Han et al. | Applicant |
| US9025894(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US9025895(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US9030528(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Pesach et al. | Applicant |
| US9031335(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US9031342(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US9031343(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US9036928(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US9036931(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US9041823(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9041824(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US9041829(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9042667(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US9049367(B2) | 2015-06-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9055233(B2) | 2015-06-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9060124(B2) | 2015-06-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9077893(B2) | 2015-07-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9094661(B2) | 2015-07-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9123117(B2) | 2015-09-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US9123118(B2) | 2015-09-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US9124815(B2) | 2015-09-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9124831(B2) | 2015-09-01 | Mullis | Applicant |
| US9124864(B2) | 2015-09-01 | Mullis | Applicant |
| US9128228(B2) | 2015-09-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US9129183(B2) | 2015-09-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9129377(B2) | 2015-09-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US9143711(B2) | 2015-09-01 | McMahon | Applicant |
| US9147254(B2) | 2015-09-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US9185276(B2) | 2015-11-01 | Rodda et al. | Applicant |
| US9188765(B2) | 2015-11-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9191580(B2) | 2015-11-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9197821(B2) | 2015-11-01 | McMahon | Applicant |
| US9210392(B2) | 2015-12-01 | Nisenzon et al. | Applicant |
| US9214013(B2) | 2015-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9235898(B2) | 2016-01-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9235900(B2) | 2016-01-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US9240049(B2) | 2016-01-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US9253380(B2) | 2016-02-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9256974(B1) | 2016-02-01 | Hines | Applicant |
| US9264592(B2) | 2016-02-01 | Rodda et al. | Applicant |
| US9264610(B2) | 2016-02-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US9361662(B2) | 2016-06-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US9412206(B2) | 2016-08-01 | McMahon et al. | Applicant |
| US9413953(B2) | 2016-08-01 | Maeda | Applicant |
| US9426343(B2) | 2016-08-01 | Rodda et al. | Applicant |
| US9426361(B2) | 2016-08-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9445003(B1) | 2016-09-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US9456196(B2) | 2016-09-01 | Kim et al. | Applicant |
| US9462164(B2) | 2016-10-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9485496(B2) | 2016-11-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9497370(B2) | 2016-11-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9519972(B2) | 2016-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US9521416(B1) | 2016-12-01 | McMahon et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0005225(A1) | 2001-06-01 | Clark et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0019621(A1) | 2001-09-01 | Hanna et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0028038(A1) | 2001-10-01 | Hamaguchi et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0038387(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Tomooka et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0012056(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Trevino | Applicant |
| US2002/0015536(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Warren | Applicant |
| US2002/0027608(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US2002/0039438(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Mori et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0057845(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Fossum | Applicant |
| US2002/0063807(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Margulis | Applicant |
| US2002/0087403(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Meyers et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0089596(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Suda | Applicant |
| US2002/0094027(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Sato et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0101528(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US2002/0113867(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Takigawa et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0113888(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Sonoda et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0122113(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Foote et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0163054(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Suda et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0167537(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Trajkovic | Applicant |
| US2002/0177054(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Saitoh et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0025227(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Daniell | Applicant |
| US2003/0086079(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Barth et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0124763(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Fan et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0140347(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Varsa | Applicant |
| US2003/0179418(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Wengender et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0188659(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Merry et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0190072(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Adkins et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0198377(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Ng et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0211405(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US2004/0008271(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Hagimori et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0012689(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Tinnerino | Applicant |
| US2004/0027358(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Nakao | Applicant |
| US2004/0047274(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Amanai | Applicant |
| US2004/0050104(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Ghosh et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0056966(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Schechner et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0061787(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Liu et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0066454(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Otani et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0071367(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Irani et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0096119(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Williams | Applicant |
| US2004/0100570(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Shizukuishi | Applicant |
| US2004/0105021(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Hu et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0114807(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0151401(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Sawhney et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0165090(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Ning | Applicant |
| US2004/0169617(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Yelton et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0170340(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Tipping et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0174439(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Upton | Applicant |
| US2004/0179834(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Szajewski | Applicant |
| US2004/0207836(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Chhibber et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0213449(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Safaee-Rad et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0218809(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Blake et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0234873(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US2004/0239885(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Jaynes et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0240052(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Minefuji et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0251509(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Choi | Applicant |
| US2004/0264806(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Herley | Applicant |
| US2005/0006477(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Patel | Applicant |
| US2005/0007461(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Chou et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0009313(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Suzuki et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0010621(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Pinto et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0012035(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Miller | Applicant |
| US2005/0036778(A1) | 2005-02-01 | DeMonte | Applicant |
| US2005/0047678(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0048690(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Yamamoto | Applicant |
| US2005/0068436(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Fraenkel et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0128509(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Tokkonen et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0128595(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Shimizu | Applicant |
| US2005/0132098(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Sonoda et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0134698(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Schroeder | Applicant |
| US2005/0134699(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Nagashima | Applicant |
| US2005/0134712(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Gruhlke et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0147277(A1) | 2005-07-01 | Higaki et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0151759(A1) | 2005-07-01 | Gonzalez-Banos et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0175257(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Kuroki | Applicant |
| US2005/0185711(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Pfister et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0205785(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Hornback et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0219363(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Kohler | Applicant |
| US2005/0224843(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Boemler | Applicant |
| US2005/0225654(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Feldman et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0265633(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Piacentino | Applicant |
| US2005/0275946(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Choo et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0286612(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Takanashi | Applicant |
| US2005/0286756(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Hong et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0002635(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Nestares et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0007331(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Izumi et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0018509(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Miyoshi | Applicant |
| US2006/0023197(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Joel | Applicant |
| US2006/0023314(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Boettiger et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0028476(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Sobel et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0033005(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Jerdev et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0034003(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Zalevsky | Applicant |
| US2006/0034531(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Poon et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0035415(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Wood | Applicant |
| US2006/0038891(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Okutomi et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0039611(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Rother | Applicant |
| US2006/0046204(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Ono et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0049930(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Zruya et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0054780(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Garrood et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0054782(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Olsen | Applicant |
| US2006/0055811(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Frtiz et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0069478(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Iwama | Applicant |
| US2006/0072029(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Miyatake et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0087747(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Ohzawa et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0098888(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Morishita | Applicant |
| US2006/0103754(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Wenstrand et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0125936(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Gruhike et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0138322(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Costello et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0152803(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Provitola | Applicant |
| US2006/0157640(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Perlman et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0159369(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Young | Applicant |
| US2006/0176566(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Boettiger et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0187338(A1) | 2006-08-01 | May et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0197937(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Bamji et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0203113(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Wada et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0210186(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Berkner | Applicant |
| US2006/0214085(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Olsen | Applicant |
| US2006/0239549(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Kelly et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0243889(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Farnworth et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0251410(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Trutna | Applicant |
| US2006/0274174(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Tewinkle | Applicant |
| US2006/0278948(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Yamaguchi et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0279648(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Senba et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0002159(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Olsen | Applicant |
| US2007/0008575(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Yu et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0009150(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Suwa | Applicant |
| US2007/0024614(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Tam | Applicant |
| US2007/0035707(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Margulis | Applicant |
| US2007/0036427(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Nakamura et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0040828(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Zalevsky et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0040922(A1) | 2007-02-01 | McKee et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0041391(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Lin et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0052825(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Cho | Applicant |
| US2007/0083114(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Yang et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0085917(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Kobayashi | Applicant |
| US2007/0092245(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Bazakos et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0102622(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0126898(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Feldman | Applicant |
| US2007/0127831(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Venkataraman | Applicant |
| US2007/0139333(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Sato et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0146503(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Shiraki | Applicant |
| US2007/0146511(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Kinoshita et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0153335(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Hosaka | Applicant |
| US2007/0158427(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Zhu et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0159541(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Sparks et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0160310(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Tanida et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0165931(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Higaki | Applicant |
| US2007/0171290(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Kroger | Applicant |
| US2007/0182843(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Shimamura et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0206241(A1) | 2007-09-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0211164(A1) | 2007-09-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0216765(A1) | 2007-09-01 | Wong et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0228256(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Mentzer | Applicant |
| US2007/0247517(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Zhang et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0257184(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0258006(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0258706(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Raskar et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0263113(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Baek et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0263114(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Gurevich et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0268374(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Robinson | Applicant |
| US2007/0296832(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Ota et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0296835(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Olsen | Applicant |
| US2007/0296847(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Chang et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0297696(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Hamza | Applicant |
| US2008/0006859(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Mionetto et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0019611(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Larkin | Applicant |
| US2008/0024683(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Damera-Venkata et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0025649(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Liu et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0030597(A1) | 2008-02-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0043095(A1) | 2008-02-01 | Vetro et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0043096(A1) | 2008-02-01 | Vetro et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0054518(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Ra et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0056302(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Erdal et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0062164(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Bassi et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0079805(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Takagi et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0080028(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Bakin et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0084486(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Enge et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0088793(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Sverdrup et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0095523(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Schilling-Benz et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0099804(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Venezia et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0112059(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Choi et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0112635(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Kondo et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0118241(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Tekolste et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0131019(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Ng | Applicant |
| US2008/0131107(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Ueno | Applicant |
| US2008/0151097(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0152215(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Horie et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0152296(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Oh et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0156991(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Hu et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0158259(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Kempf et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0158375(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Kakkori et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0158698(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Chang et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0174670(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0187305(A1) | 2008-08-01 | Raskar et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0193026(A1) | 2008-08-01 | Horie et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0211737(A1) | 2008-09-01 | Kim et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0218610(A1) | 2008-09-01 | Chapman et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0219654(A1) | 2008-09-01 | Border et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0239116(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Smith | Applicant |
| US2008/0240598(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Hasegawa | Applicant |
| US2008/0247638(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Tanida et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0247653(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Moussavi et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0272416(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Yun | Applicant |
| US2008/0273751(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Yuan et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0278591(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Barna et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0284880(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Numata | Applicant |
| US2008/0291295(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Kato et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0298674(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Baker et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0310501(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Ward et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0050946(A1) | 2009-02-01 | Duparre et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0052743(A1) | 2009-02-01 | Techmer | Applicant |
| US2009/0060281(A1) | 2009-03-01 | Tanida et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0086074(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0091645(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Trimeche et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0091806(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Inuiya | Applicant |
| US2009/0096050(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Park | Applicant |
| US2009/0102956(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Georgiev | Applicant |
| US2009/0109306(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Shan | Applicant |
| US2009/0127430(A1) | 2009-05-01 | Hirasawa et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0128833(A1) | 2009-05-01 | Yahav | Applicant |
| US2009/0129667(A1) | 2009-05-01 | Ho | Applicant |
| US2009/0140131(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Utagawa et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0147919(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Goto et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0152664(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Klem et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0167922(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Perlman et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0179142(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Duparre et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0180021(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Kikuchi et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0200622(A1) | 2009-08-01 | Tai et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0201371(A1) | 2009-08-01 | Matsuda et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0207235(A1) | 2009-08-01 | Francini et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0219435(A1) | 2009-09-01 | Yuan et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0225203(A1) | 2009-09-01 | Tanida et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0237520(A1) | 2009-09-01 | Kaneko et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0245573(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Saptharishi et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0256947(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0263017(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Tanbakuchi | Applicant |
| US2009/0268192(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Koenck et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0268970(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Babacan et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0268983(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Stone | Applicant |
| US2009/0274387(A1) | 2009-11-01 | Jin | Applicant |
| US2009/0284651(A1) | 2009-11-01 | Srinivasan | Applicant |
| US2009/0297056(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0302205(A9) | 2009-12-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0323195(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Hembree et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0323206(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Oliver et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0324118(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Maslov et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0002126(A1) | 2010-01-01 | Wenstrand et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0002313(A1) | 2010-01-01 | Duparre et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0002314(A1) | 2010-01-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US2010/0013927(A1) | 2010-01-01 | Nixon | Applicant |
| US2010/0044815(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Chang et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0053342(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Hwang | Applicant |
| US2010/0053600(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Tanida | Applicant |
| US2010/0060746(A9) | 2010-03-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0073463(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Momonoi et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0074532(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Gordon et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0085425(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Tan | Applicant |
| US2010/0086227(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Sun et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0091389(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Henriksen et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0097491(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Farina et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0103259(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Tanida et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0103308(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Butterfield et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0111444(A1) | 2010-05-01 | Coffman | Applicant |
| US2010/0118127(A1) | 2010-05-01 | Nam | Applicant |
| US2010/0128145(A1) | 2010-05-01 | Pitts et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0133230(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Henriksen et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0133418(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Sargent et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0141802(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Knight | Applicant |
| US2010/0142839(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Lakus-Becker | Applicant |
| US2010/0157073(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Kondo et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0165152(A1) | 2010-07-01 | Lim | Applicant |
| US2010/0166410(A1) | 2010-07-01 | Chang et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0177411(A1) | 2010-07-01 | Hegde et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0194901(A1) | 2010-08-01 | van Hoorebeke et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0195716(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Klein et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0201834(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Maruyama et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0202054(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Niederer | Applicant |
| US2010/0202683(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Robinson | Applicant |
| US2010/0208100(A9) | 2010-08-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0220212(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Perlman et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0223237(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Mishra et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0231285(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Boomer et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0244165(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Lake et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0259610(A1) | 2010-10-01 | Petersen et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0265346(A1) | 2010-10-01 | Iizuka | Applicant |
| US2010/0265381(A1) | 2010-10-01 | Yamamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0265385(A1) | 2010-10-01 | Knight et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0281070(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Chan et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0302423(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0309292(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Ho et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0309368(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Choi et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0321595(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Chiu et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0321640(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Yeh et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0001037(A1) | 2011-01-01 | Tewinkle | Applicant |
| US2011/0018973(A1) | 2011-01-01 | Takayama | Applicant |
| US2011/0019243(A1) | 2011-01-01 | Constant, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0031381(A1) | 2011-02-01 | Tay et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0032370(A1) | 2011-02-01 | Ludwig | Applicant |
| US2011/0033129(A1) | 2011-02-01 | Robinson | Applicant |
| US2011/0043661(A1) | 2011-02-01 | Podoleanu | Applicant |
| US2011/0043665(A1) | 2011-02-01 | Ogasahara | Applicant |
| US2011/0043668(A1) | 2011-02-01 | McKinnon et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0044502(A1) | 2011-02-01 | Liu et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0051255(A1) | 2011-03-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0055729(A1) | 2011-03-01 | Mason et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0069189(A1) | 2011-03-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0080487(A1) | 2011-04-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0085028(A1) | 2011-04-01 | Samadani et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0108708(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0121421(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Charbon | Examiner |
| US2011/0122308(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US2011/0128393(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Tavi et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0128412(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Milnes et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0149408(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Hahgholt et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0149409(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Haugholt et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0153248(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Gu et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0157321(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Nakajima et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0176020(A1) | 2011-07-01 | Chang | Applicant |
| US2011/0181797(A1) | 2011-07-01 | Galstian et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0206291(A1) | 2011-08-01 | Kashani et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0211824(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Georgiev et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0221599(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Högasten | Applicant |
| US2011/0221658(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Haddick et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0221939(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Jerdev | Applicant |
| US2011/0221950(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Oostra | Applicant |
| US2011/0228144(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Tian et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0234841(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Akeley et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0241234(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US2011/0242342(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Goma et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0242355(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Goma et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0242356(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Aleksic et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0255592(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Sung | Applicant |
| US2011/0255745(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Hodder et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0261993(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Weiming et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0267348(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Lin | Applicant |
| US2011/0273531(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Ito et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0274366(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Tardif | Applicant |
| US2011/0279705(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Kuang et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0279721(A1) | 2011-11-01 | McMahon | Applicant |
| US2011/0285866(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Bhrugumalla et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0285910(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Bamji et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0292216(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Fergus et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0298917(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Yanagita | Applicant |
| US2011/0300929(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Tardif et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0310980(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Mathew | Applicant |
| US2011/0316968(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Taguchi et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0317766(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Lim et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0012748(A1) | 2012-01-01 | Pain et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0019700(A1) | 2012-01-01 | Gaber | Applicant |
| US2012/0023456(A1) | 2012-01-01 | Sun et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0026297(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Sato | Applicant |
| US2012/0026342(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Yu et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0026366(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Golan et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0026451(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Nystrom | Applicant |
| US2012/0039525(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Tian et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0044249(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Mashitani et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0044372(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Côté et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0056982(A1) | 2012-03-01 | Katz et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0062697(A1) | 2012-03-01 | Treado et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0062702(A1) | 2012-03-01 | Jiang et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0069235(A1) | 2012-03-01 | Imai | Applicant |
| US2012/0105691(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Waqas et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0113318(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Galstian et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0113413(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Miahczylowicz-Wolski et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0147139(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0147205(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0153153(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Chang et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0154551(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Inoue | Applicant |
| US2012/0155830(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Sasaki et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0163672(A1) | 2012-06-01 | McKinnon | Applicant |
| US2012/0169433(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Mullins | Applicant |
| US2012/0170134(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Bolis et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0176479(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Mayhew et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0188341(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Klein Gunnewiek et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0188389(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Lin et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0188420(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Black et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0188634(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Kubala et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0198677(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US2012/0200669(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Lai | Applicant |
| US2012/0200726(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Bugnariu | Applicant |
| US2012/0200734(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Tang | Applicant |
| US2012/0219236(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Ali et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0224083(A1) | 2012-09-01 | Jovanovski et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0229602(A1) | 2012-09-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0229628(A1) | 2012-09-01 | Ishiyama et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0249550(A1) | 2012-10-01 | Akeley et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0249750(A1) | 2012-10-01 | Izzat et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0249836(A1) | 2012-10-01 | Ali et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0262601(A1) | 2012-10-01 | Choi et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0262607(A1) | 2012-10-01 | Shimura et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0268574(A1) | 2012-10-01 | Gidon | Applicant |
| US2012/0287291(A1) | 2012-11-01 | McMahon et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0293695(A1) | 2012-11-01 | Tanaka | Applicant |
| US2012/0307099(A1) | 2012-12-01 | Yahata et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0314033(A1) | 2012-12-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0314937(A1) | 2012-12-01 | Kim et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0327222(A1) | 2012-12-01 | Ng et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0002828(A1) | 2013-01-01 | Ding et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0003184(A1) | 2013-01-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US2013/0010073(A1) | 2013-01-01 | Do | Applicant |
| US2013/0016885(A1) | 2013-01-01 | Tsujimoto et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0022111(A1) | 2013-01-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0027580(A1) | 2013-01-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0033579(A1) | 2013-02-01 | Wajs | Applicant |
| US2013/0033585(A1) | 2013-02-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0050504(A1) | 2013-02-01 | Safaee-Rad et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0050526(A1) | 2013-02-01 | Keelan | Applicant |
| US2013/0057710(A1) | 2013-03-01 | McMahon | Applicant |
| US2013/0070060(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Chatterjee | Examiner |
| US2013/0076967(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Brunner et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0077880(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0077882(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0083172(A1) | 2013-04-01 | Baba | Applicant |
| US2013/0088489(A1) | 2013-04-01 | Schmeitz et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0088637(A1) | 2013-04-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US2013/0093842(A1) | 2013-04-01 | Yahata | Applicant |
| US2013/0107061(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Kumar et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0113899(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Morohoshi et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0113939(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Strandemar | Applicant |
| US2013/0120605(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Georgiev et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0121559(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Hu | Applicant |
| US2013/0128068(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Georgiev et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0128069(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Georgiev et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0128087(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Georgiev et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0128121(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Agarwala et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0147979(A1) | 2013-06-01 | McMahon et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0176394(A1) | 2013-07-01 | Tian et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0208138(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Li | Applicant |
| US2013/0215108(A1) | 2013-08-01 | McMahon et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0215231(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Hiramoto et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0222556(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Shimada | Applicant |
| US2013/0223759(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Nishiyama et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0229540(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Farina et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0230237(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Schlosser et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0250123(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Zhang et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0250150(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Malone | Applicant |
| US2013/0259317(A1) | 2013-10-01 | Gaddy | Applicant |
| US2013/0265459(A1) | 2013-10-01 | Duparre et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0274923(A1) | 2013-10-01 | By et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0293760(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Nisenzon et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0002674(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Duparre et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0009586(A1) | 2014-01-01 | McNamer et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0037137(A1) | 2014-02-01 | Broaddus et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0037140(A1) | 2014-02-01 | Benhimane et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0043507(A1) | 2014-02-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0076336(A1) | 2014-03-01 | Clayton et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0078333(A1) | 2014-03-01 | Miao | Applicant |
| US2014/0079336(A1) | 2014-03-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0092281(A1) | 2014-04-01 | Nisenzon et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0098267(A1) | 2014-04-01 | Tian et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0104490(A1) | 2014-04-01 | Hsieh et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0118493(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Sali et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0118584(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0132810(A1) | 2014-05-01 | McMahon | Applicant |
| US2014/0146201(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Knight et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0176592(A1) | 2014-06-01 | Wilburn et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0192253(A1) | 2014-07-01 | Laroia | Applicant |
| US2014/0198188(A1) | 2014-07-01 | Izawa | Applicant |
| US2014/0204183(A1) | 2014-07-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0218546(A1) | 2014-08-01 | McMahon | Applicant |
| US2014/0232822(A1) | 2014-08-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0240528(A1) | 2014-08-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0240529(A1) | 2014-08-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0253738(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Mullis | Applicant |
| US2014/0267243(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0267286(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US2014/0267633(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0267762(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Mullis et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0267890(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0285675(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Mullis | Applicant |
| US2014/0313315(A1) | 2014-10-01 | Shoham et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0321712(A1) | 2014-10-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0333731(A1) | 2014-11-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0333764(A1) | 2014-11-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0333787(A1) | 2014-11-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0340539(A1) | 2014-11-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0347509(A1) | 2014-11-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0347748(A1) | 2014-11-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US2014/0354773(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0354843(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0354844(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0354853(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0354854(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0354855(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0355870(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0368662(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0368683(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0368684(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0368685(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0368686(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US2014/0369612(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0369615(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0376825(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0376826(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0002734(A1) | 2015-01-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US2015/0003752(A1) | 2015-01-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0003753(A1) | 2015-01-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0009353(A1) | 2015-01-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0009354(A1) | 2015-01-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0009362(A1) | 2015-01-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0015669(A1) | 2015-01-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0035992(A1) | 2015-02-01 | Mullis | Applicant |
| US2015/0036014(A1) | 2015-02-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0036015(A1) | 2015-02-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0042766(A1) | 2015-02-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0042767(A1) | 2015-02-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0042833(A1) | 2015-02-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0049915(A1) | 2015-02-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0049916(A1) | 2015-02-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0049917(A1) | 2015-02-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0055884(A1) | 2015-02-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0085174(A1) | 2015-03-01 | Shabtay et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0091900(A1) | 2015-04-01 | Yang et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0122411(A1) | 2015-05-01 | Rodda et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0124113(A1) | 2015-05-01 | Rodda et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0124151(A1) | 2015-05-01 | Rodda et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0146029(A1) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0146030(A1) | 2015-05-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0199841(A1) | 2015-07-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0243480(A1) | 2015-08-01 | Yamada et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0296137(A1) | 2015-10-01 | Duparre et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0312455(A1) | 2015-10-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0326852(A1) | 2015-11-01 | Duparre et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0373261(A1) | 2015-12-01 | Rodda | Applicant |
| US2016/0037097(A1) | 2016-02-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US2016/0044252(A1) | 2016-02-01 | Molina | Applicant |
| US2016/0044257(A1) | 2016-02-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0057332(A1) | 2016-02-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0165106(A1) | 2016-06-01 | Duparre | Applicant |
| US2016/0165134(A1) | 2016-06-01 | Lelescu et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0165147(A1) | 2016-06-01 | Nisenzon et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0165212(A1) | 2016-06-01 | Mullis | Applicant |
| US2016/0227195(A1) | 2016-08-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0249001(A1) | 2016-08-01 | Mcmahon | Applicant |
| US2016/0267665(A1) | 2016-09-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0267672(A1) | 2016-09-01 | Ciurea et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0269650(A1) | 2016-09-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2016/0316140(A1) | 2016-10-01 | Nayar et al. | Applicant |
| US2017/0094243(A1) | 2017-03-01 | Venkataraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2017/0163862(A1) | 2017-06-01 | Molina | Applicant |
| CN1669332(A) | 2005-09-01 | Applicant | |
| CN1839394(A) | 2006-09-01 | Applicant | |
| CN101010619(A) | 2007-08-01 | Applicant | |
| CN101064780(A) | 2007-10-01 | Applicant | |
| CN101102388(A) | 2008-01-01 | Applicant | |
| CN101147392(A) | 2008-03-01 | Applicant | |
| CN101427372(A) | 2009-05-01 | Applicant | |
| CN101606086(A) | 2009-12-01 | Applicant | |
| CN101883291(A) | 2010-11-01 | Applicant | |
| CN102037717(A) | 2011-04-01 | Applicant | |
| CN102375199(A) | 2012-03-01 | Applicant | |
| EP677821(A2) | 1995-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP840502(A2) | 1998-05-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1201407(A2) | 2002-05-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1734766(A2) | 2006-12-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2026563(A1) | 2009-02-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2104334(A1) | 2009-09-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2244484(A1) | 2010-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP2336816(A2) | 2011-06-01 | Applicant | |
| GB2482022(A) | 2012-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP59-025483 | 1984-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JP64-037177 | 1989-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2-285772(A) | 1990-11-01 | Applicant | |
| JPH0715457(A) | 1995-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP9181913(A) | 1997-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP11142609(A) | 1999-05-01 | Applicant | |
| JP11223708(A) | 1999-08-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2000209503(A) | 2000-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2001277260(A) | 2001-10-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2002195910(A) | 2002-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2002205310(A) | 2002-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2002252338(A) | 2002-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2003094445(A) | 2003-04-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2003139910(A) | 2003-05-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2003163938(A) | 2003-06-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2004221585(A) | 2004-08-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2005116022(A) | 2005-04-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2005181460(A) | 2005-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2005295381(A) | 2005-10-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2005354124(A) | 2005-12-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2006033493(A) | 2006-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2006047944(A) | 2006-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2006258930(A) | 2006-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2007520107(A) | 2007-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2007259136(A) | 2007-10-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2008039852(A) | 2008-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2008055908(A) | 2008-03-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2008507874(A) | 2008-03-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2008258885(A) | 2008-10-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2009132010(A) | 2009-06-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2009300268(A) | 2009-12-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2011017764(A) | 2011-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2011030184(A) | 2011-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2011109484(A) | 2011-06-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2013526801(A) | 2013-06-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2014521117(A) | 2014-08-01 | Applicant | |
| KR1020110097647(A) | 2011-08-01 | Applicant | |
| TW200828994(A) | 2008-07-01 | Applicant | |
| TW200939739(A) | 2009-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2007083579(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2008045198(A2) | 2008-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2008108271(A1) | 2008-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2008108926(A1) | 2008-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2008150817(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2009151903(A2) | 2009-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2009157273(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2011008443(A2) | 2011-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2011055655(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2011063347(A2) | 2011-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2011116203(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2011063347(A3) | 2011-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2011143501(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2012057619(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2012057620(A2) | 2012-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2012057621(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2012057622(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2012057623(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2012057620(A3) | 2012-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2012074361(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2012078126(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2012082904(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2012155119(A1) | 2012-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2013003276(A1) | 2013-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2013043751(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2013043761(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2013049699(A1) | 2013-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2013055960(A1) | 2013-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2013119706(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2013126578(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014052974(A2) | 2014-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014032020(A3) | 2014-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014078443(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014130849(A1) | 2014-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014133974(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014138695(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014138697(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014144157(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014145856(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014149403(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014149902(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014150856(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014159721(A1) | 2014-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014159779(A1) | 2014-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014160142(A1) | 2014-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014164550(A2) | 2014-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014164909(A1) | 2014-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014165244(A1) | 2014-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2014133974(A9) | 2015-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2015048694(A2) | 2015-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2015070105(A1) | 2015-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2015081279(A1) | 2015-06-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (216)
- US 8,957,977, 02/2015, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn)Applicant
- US 8,964,053, 02/2015, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn)Applicant
- US 8,965,058, 02/2015, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn)Applicant
- US 9,014,491, 04/2015, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn)Applicant
- Eng, Wei Yong et al., “Gaze correction for 3D tele-immersive communication system”, IVMSP Workshop, 2013 IEEE 11th. IEEE, Jun. 10, 2013.Applicant
- Mitra et al., “Light Field Denoising, Light Field Superresolution and Stereo Camera Based Refocussing using a GMM Light Field Patch Prior”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Jun. 16-21, 2012, pp. 22-28.Applicant
- Moreno-Noguer et al., “Active Refocusing of Images and Videos”, ACM SIGGRAPH, 2007, vol. 26, pp. 1-10, [retrieved on Jul. 8, 2015], Retrieved from the Internet <U RL:http://doi.acm.org/1 0.1145/1276377.1276461 >.Applicant
- Muehlebach, “Camera Auto Exposure Control for VSLAM Applications”, Studies on Mechatronics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Autumn Term 2010 course, 67 pgs.Applicant
- Nayar, “Computational Cameras: Redefining the Image”, IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 30-38.Applicant
- Ng, “Digital Light Field Photography”, Thesis, Jul. 2006, 203 pgs.Applicant
- Ng et al., “Super-Resolution Image Restoration from Blurred Low-Resolution Images”, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2005, vol. 23, pp. 367-378.Applicant
- Nitta et al., “Image reconstruction for thin observation module by bound optics by using the iterative backprojection method”, Applied Optics, May 1, 2006, vol. 45, No. 13, pp. 2893-2900.Applicant
- Nomura et al., “Scene Collages and Flexible Camera Arrays”, Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2007, 12 pgs.Applicant
- Park et al., “Super-Resolution Image Reconstruction”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, May 2003, pp. 21-36.Applicant
- Perwass et al., “Single Lens 3D-Camera with Extended Depth-of-Field”, printed from www.raytrix.de, Jan. 2012, 15 pgs.Applicant
- Pham et al., “Robust Super-Resolution without Regularization”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 124, 2008, pp. 1-19.Applicant
- Philips 3D Solutions, “3D Interface Specifications, White Paper”, Philips 3D Solutions retrieved from www.philips.com/3dsolutions, 29 pgs., Feb. 15, 2008.Applicant
- Polight, “Designing Imaging Products Using Reflowable Autofocus Lenses”, http://www.polight.no/tunable-polymer-autofocus-lens-html--11.html.Applicant
- Pouydebasquea et al., “Varifocal liquid lenses with integrated actuator, high focusing power and low operating voltage fabricated on 200 mm wafers”, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 172, Issue 1, Dec. 2011, pp. 280-286.Applicant
- Protter et al., “Generalizing the Nonlocal-Means to Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Jan. 2009, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 36-51.Applicant
- Radtke et al., “Laser lithographic fabrication and characterization of a spherical artificial compound eye”, Optics Express, Mar. 19, 2007, vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 3067-3077.Applicant
- Rajan et al., “Simultaneous Estimation of Super Resolved Scene and Depth Map from Low Resolution Defocused Observations”, IEEE Computer Society, vol. 25, No. 9; Sep. 2003; pp. 1-16.Applicant
- Rander et al., “Virtualized Reality: Constructing Time-Varying Virtual Worlds From Real World Events”, Proc. of IEEE Visualization '97, Phoenix, Arizona, Oct. 19-24, 1997, pp. 277-283, 552.Applicant
- Rhemann et al, “Fast Cost-Volume Filtering for Visual Correspondence and Beyond”, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell, 2013, vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 504-511.Applicant
- Robertson et al., “Dynamic Range Improvement Through Multiple Exposures”, In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Image Processing, 1999, 5 pgs.Applicant
- Robertson et al., “Estimation-theoretic approach to dynamic range enhancement using multiple exposures”, Journal of Electronic Imaging, Apr. 2003, vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 219-228.Applicant
- Roy et al., “Non-Uniform Hierarchical Pyramid Stereo for Large Images”, Computer and Robot Vision, 2007, pp. 208-215.Applicant
- Sauer et al., “Parallel Computation of Sequential Pixel Updates in Statistical Tomographic Reconstruction”, ICIP 1995, pp. 93-96.Applicant
- Seitz et al., “Plenoptic Image Editing”, International Journal of Computer Vision 48, 2, pp. 115-129.Applicant
- Shum et al., “Pop-Up Light Field: An Interactive Image-Based Modeling and Rendering System”, Apr. 2004, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 143-162. Retrieved from http://131.107.65.14/en-us/um/people/jiansun/papers/PopupLightField—TOG.pdf on Feb. 5, 2014.Applicant
- Stollberg et al., “The Gabor superlens as an alternative wafer-level camera approach inspired by superposition compound eyes of nocturnal insects”, Optics Express, Aug. 31, 2009, vol. 17, No. 18, pp. 15747-15759.Applicant
- Sun et al., “Image Super-Resolution Using Gradient Profile Prior”, Source and date unknown, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Takeda et al., “Super-resolution Without Explicit Subpixel Motion Estimation”, IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, Sep. 2009, vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 1958-1975.Applicant
- Tallon et al., “Upsampling and Denoising of Depth Maps Via Joint-Segmentation”, 20th European Signal Processing Conference, Aug. 27-31, 2012, 5 pgs.Applicant
- Tanida et al., “Color imaging with an integrated compound imaging system”, Optics Express, Sep. 8, 2003, vol. 11, No. 18, pp. 2109-2117.Applicant
- Tanida et al., “Thin observation module by bound optics (TOMBO): concept and experimental verification”, Applied Optics, Apr. 10, 2001, vol. 40, No. 11, pp. 1806-1813.Applicant
- Taylor, “Virtual camera movement: The way of the future?”, American Cinematographer vol. 77, No. 9, Sep. 1996, 93-100.Applicant
- Vaish et al., “Reconstructing Occluded Surfaces Using Synthetic Apertures: Stereo, Focus and Robust Measures”, Proceeding, CVPR '06 Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition—vol. 2, pp. 2331-2338.Applicant
- Vaish et al., “Synthetic Aperture Focusing Using a Shear-Warp Factorization of the Viewing Transform”, IEEE Workshop on A3DISS, CVPR, 2005, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Vaish et al., “Using Plane + Parallax for Calibrating Dense Camera Arrays”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2004, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Veilleux, “CCD Gain Lab: The Theory”, University of Maryland, College Park-Observational Astronomy (ASTR 310), Oct. 19, 2006, pp. 1-5 (online], [retrieved on May 13, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.astro.umd.edu/˜veilleux/ASTR310/fall06/ccd—theory.pdf, 5 pgs.Applicant
- Venkataraman et al., “PiCam: An Ultra-Thin High Performance Monolithic Camera Array”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), ACM, US, vol. 32, No. 6, Nov. 1, 2013 (Nov. 1, 2013 ), pp. 1-13.Applicant
- Vuong et al., “A New Auto Exposure and Auto White-Balance Algorithm to Detect High Dynamic Range Conditions Using CMOS Technology”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2008, WCECS 2008, Oct. 22-24, 2008.Applicant
- Wang, “Calculation of Image Position, Size and Orientation Using First Order Properties”, 10 pgs.Applicant
- Wetzstein et al., “Computational Plenoptic Imaging”, Computer Graphics Forum, 2011, vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 2397-2426.Applicant
- Wheeler et al., “Super-Resolution Image Synthesis Using Projections Onto Convex Sets in the Frequency Domain”, Proc. SPIE, 2005, 5674, 12 pgs.Applicant
- Wikipedia, “Polarizing Filter (Photography)”, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizing—filter—(photography), 1 pg.Applicant
- Wilburn, “High Performance Imaging Using Arrays of Inexpensive Cameras”, Thesis of Bennett Wilburn, Dec. 2004, 128 pgs.Applicant
- Wilburn et al., “High Performance Imaging Using Large Camera Arrays”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Jul. 2005, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 1-12.Applicant
- Wilburn et al., “High-Speed Videography Using a Dense Camera Array”, Proceeding, CVPR'04 Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 294-301.Applicant
- Wilburn et al., “The Light Field Video Camera”, Proceedings of Media Processors 2002, SPIE Electronic Imaging, 2002, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Wippermann et al., “Design and fabrication of a chirped array of refractive ellipsoidal micro-lenses for an apposition eye camera objective”, Proceedings of SPIE, Optical Design and Engineering II, Oct. 15, 2005, 59622C-1-59622C-11.Applicant
- Yang et al., “A Real-Time Distributed Light Field Camera”, Eurographics Workshop on Rendering (2002), pp. 1-10.Applicant
- Yang et al., “Superresolution Using Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Method”, Source and date unknown, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Zhang et al., “A Self-Reconfigurable Camera Array”, Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2004, 12 pgs.Applicant
- Zhang et al., “Depth estimation, spatially variant image registration, and super-resolution using a multi-lenslet camera”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7705, Apr. 23, 2010, pp. 770505-770505-8, XP055113797 ISSN: 0277-786X, DOI: 10.1117/12.852171.Applicant
- Zheng et al., “Balloon Motion Estimation Using Two Frames”, Proceedings of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, IEEE, Comp. Soc. Press, US, vol. 2 of 02, Nov. 4, 1991, pp. 1057-1061.Applicant
- Zomet et al., “Robust Super-Resolution”, IEEE, 2001, pp. 1-6.Applicant
- Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 13810429.4, Completed date Jan. 7, 2016, Mailed on Jan. 15, 2016, 6 Pgs.Applicant
- Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12782935.6, report completed Aug. 28, 2014 Mailed Sep. 4, 2014, 7 Pgs.Applicant
- Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12804266.0, Report Completed Jan. 27, 2015, Mailed Feb. 3, 2015, 6 Pgs.Applicant
- Extended European Search Report for European Application EP12835041.0, Report Completed Jan. 28, 2015, Mailed Feb. 4, 2015, 7 Pgs.Applicant
- Extended European Search Report for European Application EP13810229.8, Report Completed Apr. 14, 2016, Mailed Apr. 21, 2016, 7 pgs.Applicant
- Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13830945.5, Search completed Jun. 28, 2016, Mailed Jul. 7, 2016, 14 Pgs.Applicant
- Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13841613.6, Search completed Jul. 18, 2016, Mailed Jul. 26, 2016, 8 Pgs.Applicant
- Supplementary European Search Report for EP Application No. 13831768.0, Search completed May 18, 2016, Mailed May 30, 2016, 13 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2012/059813, Search Completed Apr. 15, 2014, 7 pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/059991, Issued Mar. 17, 2015, Mailed Mar. 26, 2015, 8 pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US13/56065, Report Issued Feb. 24, 2015, Mailed Mar 5, 2015, 4 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US13/62720, Report Issued Mar. 31, 2015, Mailed Apr. 9, 2015, 8 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/024987, Mailed Aug. 21, 2014, 13 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/027146, completed Aug. 26, 2014, Mailed Sep. 4, 2014, 10 Pages.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/039155, completed Nov. 4, 2014, Mailed Nov. 13, 2014, 10 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/046002, issued Dec. 31, 2014, Mailed Jan. 8, 2015, 6 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/048772, issued Dec. 31, 2014, Mailed Jan. 8, 2015, 8 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/056502, Report Issued Feb. 24, 2015, Mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 7 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/069932, issued May 19, 2015, Mailed May 28, 2015, 12 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/017766, issued Aug. 25, 2015, Mailed Sep. 3, 2015, 8 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/018084, issued Aug. 25, 2015, Mailed Sep. 3, 2015, 11 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/018116, issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 12 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/021439, issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 9 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/022118, issued Sep. 8, 2015, Mailed Sep. 17, 2015, 4 pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/022123, issued Sep. 8, 2015, Mailed Sep. 17, 2015, 4 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/022774, issued Sep. 22, 2015, Mailed Oct. 1, 2015, 5 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/023762, issued Mar. 2, 2015, Mailed Mar. 9, 2015, 10 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/024407, issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 8 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/024903, issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 12 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/024947, issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 7 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/025100, issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 4 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/025904, issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 5 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/028447, issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 7 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/030692, issued Sep. 15, 2015, Mailed Sep. 24, 2015, 6 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/064693, issued May 10, 2016, Mailed May 19, 2016, 14 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/066229, Report issued May 24, 2016, Mailed Jun. 6, 2016, 8 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/067740, issued May 31, 2016, Mailed Jun. 9, 2016, 9 Pgs.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2015/019529, issued Sep. 13, 2016, Mailed Sep. 22, 2016, 9 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/46002, completed Nov. 13, 2013, Mailed Nov. 29, 2013, 7 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/56065, Completed Nov. 25, 2013, Mailed Nov. 26, 2013, 8 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US13/59991, Completed Feb. 6, 2014, Mailed Feb. 26, 2014, 8 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/64921, Completed Feb. 25, 2011, mailed Mar. 6, 2012, 17 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/024987, Completed Mar. 27, 2013, Mailed Apr. 15, 2013, 14 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/027146, completed Apr. 2, 2013, 12 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/039155, completed Jul. 1, 2013, Mailed Jul. 11, 2013, 11 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/048772, Completed Oct. 21, 2013, Mailed Nov. 8, 2013, 6 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/056502, Completed Feb. 18, 2014, Mailed Mar. 19, 2014, 7 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/069932, Completed Mar. 14, 2014, Mailed Apr. 14, 2014, 12 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/019529, completed May 5, 2015, Mailed Jun. 8, 2015, 10 Pgs.Applicant
- US 9,338,332, 5/2016, Venkataraman et al. (withdrawn).Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US11/36349, mailed Aug. 22, 2011, 11 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US13/62720, completed Mar. 25, 2014, Mailed Apr. 21, 2014, 9 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/024903, completed Jun. 12, 2014, Mailed, Jun. 27, 2014, 13 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/17766, report completed May 28, 2014, Mailed Jun. 18, 2014, 9 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/18084, report completed May 23, 2014, Mailed Jun. 10, 2014, 12 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/18116, Report completed May 13, 2014, 12 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/22118, report completed Jun. 9, 2014, Mailed, Jun. 25, 2014, 5 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/22774 report completed Jun. 9, 2014, Mailed Jul. 14, 2014, 6 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/24407, report completed Jun. 11, 2014, Mailed Jul. 8, 2014, 9 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/25100, report completed Jul. 7, 2014, Mailed Aug. 7, 2014 5 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/25904 report completed Jun. 10, 2014, Mailed Jul. 10, 2014, 6 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2009/044687, completed Jan. 5, 2010, mailed Jan. 13, 2010, 9 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2010/057661, completed Mar. 9, 2011, 14 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/044014, completed Oct. 12, 2012, 15 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/056151, completed Nov. 14, 2012, 10 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/059813, Report completed Dec. 17, 2012, 8 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/37670, Mailed Jul. 18, 2012, Completed Jul. 5, 2012, 9 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/58093, Report completed Nov. 15, 2012, 12 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/022123, completed Jun. 9, 2014, Mailed Jun. 25, 2014, 5 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/024947, Completed Jul. 8, 2014, Mailed Aug. 5, 2014, 7 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/028447, completed Jun. 30, 2014, Mailed Jul. 21, 2014, 8 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/030692, completed Jul. 28, 2014, Mailed Aug. 27, 2014, 7 Pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/064693, Completed Mar. 7, 2015, Mailed Apr. 2, 2015, 15 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/066229, Completed Mar. 6, 2015, Mailed Mar. 19, 2015, 9 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/067740, Completed Jan. 29, 2015, Mailed Mar. 3, 2015, 10 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2014/23762, Completed May 30, 2014, Mailed Jul. 3, 2014, 6 Pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/21439, completed Jun. 5, 2014, Mailed Jun. 20, 2014, 10 Pgs.Applicant
- Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,106, dated Aug. 16, 2012, 12 pgs.Applicant
- “File Formats Version 6”, Alias Systems, 2004, 40 pgs.Applicant
- Baker et al., “Limits on Super-Resolution and How to Break Them”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Sep. 2002, vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 1167-1183.Applicant
- Bennett et al., “Multispectral Bilateral Video Fusion”, 2007 IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 1185-1194.Applicant
- Bertero et al., “Super-resolution in computational imaging”, Micron, 2003, vol. 34, Issues 6-7, 17 pgs.Applicant
- Bishop et al., “Full-Resolution Depth Map Estimation from an Aliased Plenoptic Light Field”, ACCV 2010, Part II, LNCS 6493, pp. 186-200.Applicant
- Bishop et al., “Light Field Superresolution”, Retrieved from http://home.eps.hw.ac.uk/˜sz73/ICCP09/LightFieldSuperresolution.pdf, 9 pgs.Applicant
- Bishop et al., “The Light Field Camera: Extended Depth of Field, Aliasing, and Superresolution”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, May 2012, vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 972-986.Applicant
- Borman, “Topics in Multiframe Superresolution Restoration”, Thesis of Sean Borman, Apr. 2004, 282 pgs.Applicant
- Borman et al, “Image Sequence Processing”, Source unknown, Oct. 14, 2002, 81 pgs.Applicant
- Borman et al., “Block-Matching Sub-Pixel Motion Estimation from Noisy, Under-Sampled Frames—An Empirical Performance Evaluation”, Proc SPIE, Dec. 1998, 3653, 10 pgs.Applicant
- Borman et al., “Image Resampling and Constraint Formulation for Multi-Frame Super-Resolution Restoration”, Proc. SPIE, Jun. 2003, 5016, 12 pgs.Applicant
- Borman et al., “Linear models for multi-frame super-resolution restoration under non-affine registration and spatially varying PSF”, Proc. SPIE, May 2004, vol. 5299, 12 pgs.Applicant
- Borman et al., “Nonlinear Prediction Methods for Estimation of Clique Weighting Parameters in NonGaussian Image Models”, Proc. SPIE, 1998. 3459, 9 pgs.Applicant
- Borman et al., “Simultaneous Multi-Frame MAP Super-Resolution Video Enhancement Using Spatio-Temporal Priors”, Image Processing, 1999, ICIP 99 Proceedings, vol. 3, pp. 469-473.Applicant
- Borman et al., “Super-Resolution from Image Sequences—A Review”, Circuits & Systems, 1998, pp. 374-378.Applicant
- Bose et al., “Superresolution and Noise Filtering Using Moving Least Squares”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, date unknown, 21 pgs.Applicant
- Boys et al., “Comparison of Subpixel Image Registration Algorithms”, Proc. of SPIE—IS&T Electronic Imaging, vol. 7246, pp. 72460X-1-72460X-9.Applicant
- Bruckner et al., “Artificial compound eye applying hyperacuity”, Optics Express, Dec. 11, 2006, vol. 14, No. 25, pp. 12076-12084.Applicant
- Bruckner et al., “Driving microoptical imaging systems towards miniature camera applications”, Proc. SPIE, Micro-Optics, 2010, 11 pgs.Applicant
- Bruckner et al., “Thin wafer-level camera lenses inspired by insect compound eyes”, Optics Express, Nov. 22, 2010, vol. 18, No. 24, pp. 24379-24394.Applicant
- Capel, “Image Mosaicing and Super-resolution”, [online], Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2012 (Nov. 10, 2012). Retrieved from the Internet at URL<http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.226.2643&rep=rep1 &type=pdf>, Title pg., abstract, table of contents, pp. 1-263 (269 total pages).Applicant
- Chan et al., “Extending the Depth of Field in a Compound-Eye Imaging System with Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, Proceedings—International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 623-626.Applicant
- Chan et al., “Investigation of Computational Compound-Eye Imaging System with Super-Resolution Reconstruction”, IEEE, ISASSP 2006, pp. 1177-1180.Applicant
- Chan et al., “Super-resolution reconstruction in a computational compound-eye imaging system”, Multidim Syst Sign Process, 2007, vol. 18, pp. 83-101.Applicant
- Chen et al., “Interactive deformation of light fields”, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH I3D 2005, pp. 139-146.Applicant
- Chen et al., “KNN Matting”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Sep. 2013, vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 2175-2188.Applicant
- Crabb et al., “Real-time foreground segmentation via range and color imaging”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2008. CVPRW'08. IEEE Computer Society Conference on. IEEE, 2008.Applicant
- Drouin et al., “Fast Multiple-Baseline Stereo with Occlusion”, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2005, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Drouin et al., “Geo-Consistency for Wide Multi-Camera Stereo”, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Drouin et al., “Improving Border Localization of Multi-Baseline Stereo Using Border-Cut”, International Journal of Computer Vision, Jul. 2009, vol. 83, Issue 3, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Artificial apposition compound eye fabricated by micro-optics technology”, Applied Optics, Aug. 1, 2004, vol. 43, No. 22, pp. 4303-4310.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Artificial compound eye zoom camera”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, vol. 3, pp. 1-6.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Artificial compound eyes—different concepts and their application to ultra flat image acquisition sensors”, MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems IV, Proc. SPIE 5346, Jan. 2004, pp. 89-100.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Chirped arrays of refractive ellipsoidal microlenses for aberration correction under oblique incidence”, Optics Express, Dec. 26, 2005, vol. 13, No. 26, pp. 10539-10551.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Micro-optical artificial compound eyes”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2006, vol. 1, pp. R1-R16.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Microoptical artificial compound eyes—from design to experimental verification of two different concepts”, Proc. of SPIE, Optical Design and Engineering II, vol. 5962, pp. 59622A-1-59622A-12.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Microoptical Artificial Compound Eyes—Two Different Concepts for Compact Imaging Systems”, 11th Microoptics Conference, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2005, 2 pgs.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Microoptical telescope compound eye”, Optics Express, Feb. 7, 2005, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 889-903.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Micro-optically fabricated artificial apposition compound eye”, Electronic Imaging—Science and Technology, Prod. SPIE 5301, Jan. 2004, pp. 25-33.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Novel Optics/Micro-Optics for Miniature Imaging Systems”, Proc. of SPIE, 2006, vol. 6196, pp. 619607-1-619607-15.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Theoretical analysis of an artificial superposition compound eye for application in ultra flat digital image acquisition devices”, Optical Systems Design, Proc. SPIE 5249, Sep. 2003, pp. 408-418.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Thin compound-eye camera”, Applied Optics, May 20, 2005, vol. 44, No. 15, pp. 2949-2956.Applicant
- Duparre et al., “Ultra-Thin Camera Based on Artificial Apposistion Compound Eyes”, 10th Microoptics Conference, Sep. 1-3, 2004, 2 pgs.Applicant
- Fanaswala, “Regularized Super-Resolution of Multi-View Images”, Retrieved on Nov. 10, 2012 (Nov. 10, 2012). Retrieved from the Internet at URL<http://www.site.uottawa.ca/-edubois/theses/Fanaswala—thesis.pdf>, 163 pgs.Applicant
- Farrell et al., “Resolution and Light Sensitivity Tradeoff with Pixel Size”, Proceedings of the SPIE Electronic Imaging 2006 Conference, 2006, vol. 6069, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Farsiu et al., “Advances and Challenges in Super-Resolution”, International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 2004, vol. 14, pp. 47-57.Applicant
- Farsiu et al., “Fast and Robust Multiframe Super Resolution”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Oct. 2004, vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 1327-1344.Applicant
- Farsiu et al., “Multiframe Demosaicing and Super-Resolution of Color Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Jan. 2006, vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 141-159.Applicant
- Feris et al., “Multi-Flash Stereopsis: Depth Edge Preserving Stereo with Small Baseline Illumination”, IEEE Trans on PAMI, 2006, 31 pgs.Applicant
- Fife et al., “A 3D Multi-Aperture Image Sensor Architecture”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2006, CICC '06, IEEE, pp. 281-284.Applicant
- Fife et al., “A 3MPixel Multi-Aperture Image Sensor with 0.7Mu Pixels in 0.11Mu CMOS”, ISSCC 2008, Session 2, Image Sensors & Technology, 2008, pp. 48-50.Applicant
- Fischer et al., “Optical System Design”, 2nd Edition, SPIE Press, pp. 191-198.Applicant
- Fischer et al., “Optical System Design”, 2nd Edition, SPIE Press, pp. 49-58.Applicant
- Goldman et al., “Video Object Annotation, Navigation, and Composition”, In Proceedings of UIST 2008, pp. 3-12.Applicant
- Gortler et al., The Lumigraph, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996, pp. 43-54.Applicant
- Hacohen et al., “Non-Rigid Dense Correspondence with Applications for Image Enhancement”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 30, 4, 2011, pp. 70:1-70:10.Applicant
- Hamilton, “JPEG File Interchange Format, Version 1.02”, Sep. 1, 1992, 9 pgs.Applicant
- Hardie, “A Fast Image Super-Algorithm Using an Adaptive Wiener Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Dec. 2007, vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 2953-2964.Applicant
- Hasinoff et al., “Search-and-Replace Editing for Personal Photo Collections”, Computational Photography (ICCP) 2010, pp. 1-8.Applicant
- Horisaki et al., “Irregular Lens Arrangement Design to Improve Imaging Performance of Compound-Eye Imaging Systems”, Applied Physics Express, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 022501-1-022501-3.Applicant
- Horisaki et al., “Superposition Imaging for Three-Dimensionally Space-Invariant Point Spread Functions”, Applied Physics Express, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 112501-1-112501-3.Applicant
- Horn et al., “LightShop: Interactive Light Field Manipulation and Rendering”, in Proceedings of I3D 2007, pp. 121-128.Applicant
- Huayang et al., “A virtual view synthesis algorithm based on image inpainting”, 2012 Third International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing. IEEE, 2012.Applicant
- Isaksen et al., “Dynamically Reparameterized Light Fields”, In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 297-306.Applicant
- Jarabo et al., “Efficient Propagation of Light Field Edits”, In Proceedings of SIACG 2011, pp. 75-80.Applicant
- Joshi, et al., “Synthetic Aperture Tracking: Tracking Through Occlusions”, I CCV IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision; Publication [online]. Oct. 2007 [retrieved Jul. 28, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http:l/ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4409032&isnumber=4408819>; pp. 1-8.Applicant
- Kang et al., “Handling Occlusions inn Dense Multi-View Stereo”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001, vol. 1, pp. 1-103-1-110.Applicant
- Kitamura et al., “Reconstruction of a high-resolution image on a compound-eye image-capturing system”, Applied Optics, Mar. 10, 2004, vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 1719-1727.Applicant
- Krishnamurthy et al., “Compression and Transmission of Depth Maps for Image-Based Rendering”, Image Processing, 2001, pp. 828-831.Applicant
- Kutulakos et al., “Occluding Contour Detection Using Affine Invariants and Purposive Viewpoint Control”, Proc., CVPR 94, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Lai et al., “A Large-Scale Hierarchical Multi-View RGB-D Object Dataset”, May 2011, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Lee et al., “Electroactive Polymer Actuator for Lens-Drive Unit in Auto-Focus Compact Camera Module”, ETRI Journal, vol. 31, No. 6, Dec. 2009, pp. 695-702.Applicant
- Lensvector, “How LensVector Autofocus Works”, printed Nov. 2, 2012 from http://www.lensvector.com/overview.html, 1 pg.Applicant
- Levin et al., “A Closed Form Solution to Natural Image Matting”, Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Feb. 2008, vol. 30, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Levoy, “Light Fields and Computational Imaging”, IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 46-55.Applicant
- Levoy et al., “Light Field Rendering”, Proc. ADM SIGGRAPH '96, pp. 1-12.Applicant
- Li et al., “A Hybrid Camera for Motion Deblurring and Depth Map Super-Resolution”, Jun. 23-28, 2008, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 8 pgs. Retrieved from www.eecis.udel.edu/˜jye/lab—research/08/deblur-feng.pdf on Feb. 5, 2014.Applicant
- Liu et al., “Virtual View Reconstruction Using Temporal Information”, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2012, pp. 115-120.Applicant
- Lo et al., “Stereoscopic 3D Copy & Paste”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 29, No. 6, Article 147, Dec. 2010, pp. 147:1-147:10.Applicant
- Merkle et al., “Adaptation and optimization of coding algorithms for mobile 3DTV”, Mobile3DTV Project No. 216503, Nov. 2008, 55 pgs.Applicant