Minimally invasive joint implant with 3-dimensional geometry matching the articular surfaces

Patent Citations (709)

Non-Patent Literature (479)

• Adam et al., “NMR tomography of the cartilage structures of the knee joint with 3-D volume image combined with a rapid optical-imaging computer,” ROFO Fortschr. Geb. Rontgenstr. Nuklearmed., 150(1): 44-48 (1989) Abstract Only.Applicant
• Adam et al., “MR Imaging of the Knee: Three-Dimensional Volume Imaging Combined with Fast Processing,”J. Compt. Asst. Tomogr., 13(6): 984-988 (1989).Applicant
• Adams et al., “Quantitative Imaging of Osteoarthritis,” Semin Arthritis Rheum, 20(6) Suppl. 2: 26-39 (Jun. 1991).Applicant
• Ahmad et al., “Biomechanical and Topographic Considerations for Autologous Osteochondral Grafting in the Knee,” Am J Sports Med, 29(2): 201-206 (Mar.-Apr. 2001).Applicant
• Alexander, “Estimating the motion of bones from markers on the skin,” University of Illinois at Chicago (Doctoral Dissertation) (1998).Applicant
• Alexander et al., “Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems,” Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Meeting, San Diego, CA (1998).Applicant
• Alexander et al., “Internal to external correspondence in the analysis of lower limb bone motion,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference, Big Sky, Montana (1999).Applicant
• Alexander et al., “State estimation theory in human movement analysis,” Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress (1998).Applicant
• Alexander et al., “Optimization techniques for skin deformation correction,” International Symposium on 3-D Human Movement Conference, Chattanooga, TN, (1998).Applicant
• Alexander et al., “Dynamic Functional Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System,” ASME Winter International Congress and Exposition, Nashville, TN (1999).Applicant
• Allen et al., “Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy 5 factors affecting the knee after operations,” J Bone Joint Surg 66B: 666-671 (1984).Applicant
• Alley et al., “Ultrafast contrast-enhanced three dimensional MR Aagiography: State of the art,” Radiographics 18: 273-285 (1998).Applicant
• Andersson et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Acta. Orthrop. Scand. 45(2):245-259 (1974).Applicant
• Andriacchi, “Dynamics of knee Malalignment,” Orthop Clin North Am 25: 395-403 (1994).Applicant
• Andriacchi, et al., “A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: Applied to a study of knee kinematics,” J. Biomech Eng 120(12): 743-749 (1998).Applicant
• Andriacchi, et al., “Methods for evaluating the progression of Osterarthiritis,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 37(2): 163-170 (2000).Applicant
• Andriacchi et al., “Gait analysis as a tool to assess joint kinetics biomechanics of normal and pathological human articulating joints,” Nijhoff, Series E 93: 83-102 (1985).Applicant
• Andriacchi et al., “In vivo measurement of six-degrees-of-freedom knee movement during functional testing,” Transactions of the Orthopedic Research Society 698 (1995).Applicant
• Argenson et al., “Is There a Place for Patellofemoral Arthroplasty?,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research No. 321, pp. 162-167 (1995).Applicant
• Aro et al., “Clinical Use of Bone Allografts,” Ann Med 25:403-412 (1993).Applicant
• Bashir, “Validation of Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of FAF Measurement in Human Cartilage,” Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med. (1998).Applicant
• Beaulieu et al., “Glenohumeral relationships during physiological shoulder motion and stress testing: Initial experience with open MRI and active Scan-25 plane registration,” Radiology (1999).Applicant
• Beaulieu et al., “Dynamic imaging of glenohumeral instability with open MRI,” Int. Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Sydney, Australia (1998).Applicant
• Beckmann et al., “Noninvasive 3D MR Microscopy as Tool in Pharmacological Research: Application to a Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Magn Reson Imaging 13(7): 1013-1017 (1995).Applicant
• Billet, Philippe, French Version—“Gliding Knee Prostheses—Analysis of Mechanical Failures”, Thesis, Medical School of Marseilles, 1982, 64 pages.Applicant
• Billet, Philippe, Translated Version—“Gliding Knee Prostheses—Analysis of Mechanical Failures”, Thesis, Medical School of Marseilles, 1982, 93 pages.Applicant
• Blazina et al., “Patellofemoral replacement: Utilizing a customized femoral groove replacement,” 5(1)53-55 (1990).Applicant
• Blum et al., “Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis,” ANN. Rheum. Dis. 33 (1): 1-11 (1974).Applicant
• Bobic, “Arthroscopic osteochondral autogaft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study,” Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3(4): 262-264 (1996).Applicant
• Boe et al., “Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in patients aged over 50,” J. Bone Joint Surg 68B: 707 (1986).Applicant
• Bogoch, et al., “Supracondylar Fractures of the Femur Adjacent to Resurfacing and MacIntosh Arthroplasties of the Knee in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Clin. Orthop. (229):213-220 (Apr. 1988).Applicant
• Borthakur et al., “In Vivo Triple Quantum Filtered Sodium MRI of Human Articular Cartilage,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:549 (1999).Applicant
• Bregler et al., “Recovering non-rigid 3D shape from image streams,” Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Jun. 2000).Applicant
• Brett et al., “Quantitative Analysis of Biomedical Images,” Univ. of Manchester, Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, IBM UK, http://www.wiau.man.ac.uk/˜ads/imv (1998).Applicant
• Brittberg et al., “A critical analysis of cartilage repair,” Acta Orthop Scand 68(2): 186-191 (1997).Applicant
• Brittberg et al., “Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chrondrocyte transplantation,” N Engl J Med 331(14): 889-895 (1994).Applicant
• Broderick et al., “Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs. arthroscopy,” AJR 162: 99-103 (1994).Applicant
• Brown, Ph.D., et al., “MRI Basic Principles and Applications”, Second Ed., Mark A. Brown and Richard C. Semelka, 1999, Wiley-Liss Inc., Title page and Table of Contents Pages Only (ISBN 0471330620).Applicant
• Burgkart et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Assessment of Cartilage Loss in Severe Osteoarthritis,” Arth Rheum; 44(9): 2072-2077 (Sep. 2001).Applicant
• Butterworth et al., “A T1O2 Dielectric-Filled Toroidal Resonator,” Depts of Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, Neurology, & Center for Nuclear Imaging Research, U. of Alabama at Birmingham, USA, 1 Page (1999).Applicant
• Butts et al., “Real-Time MR imaging of joint motion on an open MR imaging scanner,” Radiological Society of North America, 83rd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL (1997).Applicant
• Cameron, et al., “Review of a Failed Knee Replacement and Some Observations on the Design of a Knee Resurfacing Prosthesis,” Arch. Orthop Trauma Surg. 97(2):87-89 (1980).Applicant
• Carano et al., “Estimation of Erosive Changes in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Temporal Multispectral Analysis,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:408 (1999).Applicant
• Carr et al., “Surface Interpolation with Radial Basis Functions for Medical Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, IEEE, Inc. New York, vol. 16, pp. 96-107 (Feb. 1997).Applicant
• Castriota-Scanderbeg et al., “Precision of Sonographic Measurement of Articular Cartilage: Inter- and Intraobserver Analysis,” Skeletal Radiol 25: 545-549 (1996).Applicant
• Chan et al., “Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Comparison of Radiography, CT and MR Imaging to Asses Extent and Severity,” AJR Am J Roentgenol 157(4): 799-806 (1991).Applicant
• Clarke et al., “Human Hip Joint Geometry and Hemiarthroplasty Selection,” The Hip. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis 63-89 (1975).Applicant
• Clary et al., “Experience with the MacIntosh Knee Prosthesis,” South Med. J. 65(3):265-272 (1972).Applicant
• Cohen et al., “Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 7: 95-109 (1999).Applicant
• Conaty, et al., “Surgery of the Hip and Knee in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 55(2):301-314 (1973).Applicant
• Creamer et al., “Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee: A Method of Measuring Response to Intra-Articular Treatments,” Ann Rheum Dis. 378-381 (1997).Applicant
• Daniel et al., “Breast cancer-gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging with a 0.5T open imager and three-point Dixon technique,” Radiology 207(1): 183-190 (1998).Applicant
• Dardzinski et al., “Entropy Mapping of Articular Cartilage”, ISMRM Seventh Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, PA (1999) T. 41, V. II.Applicant
• Dardzinski et al., “T1-T2 Comparison in Adult Articular Cartilage,” ISMRM Seventh Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, PA (May 22-28, 1999).Applicant
• De Winter et al. “The Richards Type II Patellofemoral Arthroplasty”, Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72 (5): 487-490.Applicant
• Disler, “Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage,” AJR 169: 1117-1123 (1997).Applicant
• Disler et al., “Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy,” AJR 167: 127-132 (1996).Applicant
• Disler et al., “Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy,” AJR 165: 377-382 (1995).Applicant
• Doherty et al., Osteoarthritis, Oxford Textbook of Theumatology, Oxford University Press 959-983 (1993).Applicant
• Dougados et al., “Longitudinal radiologic evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee,” J Theumatol 19: 378-384 (1992).Applicant
• Du et al., “Vessel enhancement filtering in three-dimensional MR angiography,” J. Magn Res Imaging 5: 151-157 (1995).Applicant
• Du et al., “Reduction of partial-volume artifacts with zero filled interpolation in three-dimensional MR Angiography,” J Magn Res Imaging 4: 733-741 (1994).Applicant
• Dufour et al., “A Technique for the Dynamical Evaluation of the Acromiohumeral Distance of the Shoulder in the Seated Position under Open-field MRI,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:406 (1999).Applicant
• Dumoulin et al., “Real-time position monitoring of invasive devises using magnetic resonance,” Magn Reson Med 29: 411-5 (1993).Applicant
• Dupuy et al., “Quantification of Articular Cartilage in the Knee with Three-Dimensional MR Imaging,” Acad Radiol 3: 919-924 (1996).Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “Determination of Knee Joint Cartilage Thickness Using Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Chondro-Crassometry (3D MR-CCM),” Magn. Reson. Med. 36(2):256-265, (1996).Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “Effect of Gradient and Section Orientation on Quantitative Analyses of Knee Joint Cartilage,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 11: 161-167 (2000).Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “Effect of Physical Exercise on Cartilage Volume and Thickness In Vivo: An MR Imaging Study,” Radiology 207: 243-248 (1998).Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “Functional Analysis of Articular Cartilage Deformation, Recovery, and Fluid Flow Following Dynamic Exercise In Vivo,” Anatomy and Embryology 200: 419-424 (1999).Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “In Vivo Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional Cartilage Volume and Thickness Measurements With MR Imaging”, AJR 170(3): 593-597 (1998).Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “New Quantitative Approaches With 3-D MRI: Cartilage Morphology, Function and Degeneration”, Medical Imaging International, Nov.-Dec. 1998.Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “Side Differences of Knee Joint Cartilage Volume, Thickness, and Surface Area, and Correlation With Lower Limb Dominance—An MRI-Based Study,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 10: 914-921 (2002).Applicant
• Eckstein et al., Accuracy of Cartilage Volume and Thickness Measurements with Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clin. Orthop. 1998; 352: 137-148 T. 60 V. II.Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “Magnetic Resonance Chondro-Crassometry (MR CCM): A Method for Accurate Determination of Articular Cartilage Thickness?” Magn. Reson. Med. 35: 89-96 (1996).Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “The Influence of Geometry on the Stress Distribution in Joints—A Finite Element Analysis,” Anat Embryol, 189: 545-552 (1994).Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “The Morphology of Articular Cartilage Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Reproducibility and Anatomical Correlation,” Sur. Radiol Anat 16: 429-438 (1994).Applicant
• Elting et al., “Unilateral frame distraction: proximal tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthritis,” Contemp Orthrop 27(6): 522-524 (1993).Applicant
• Faber et al., “Gender Differences in Knee Joint Cartilage Thickness, Volume and Articular Surface Areas: Assessment With Quantitative Three-Dimensional MR Imaging,” Skeletal Radiology 30 (3): 144-150 (2001).Applicant
• Faber et al., “Quantitative Changes of Articular Cartilage Microstructure During Compression of an Intact Joint,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:547 (1999).Applicant
• Falcao et al., “User-steered image segmentation paradigms. Live wire and live lane,” Graphical Models and Image Processing 60: 233-260 (1998).Applicant
• Felson et al., “Weight Loss Reduces the risk for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in women: the Framingham study,” Ann Intern Med 116: 535-539 (1992).Applicant
• Gandy et al., “One-Year Longitudinal Study of Femoral Cartilage Lesions in Knee Arthritis,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:1032 (1999).Applicant
• Garrett, “Osteochondral allografts for reconstruction of articular defects of the knee,” Instr Course Lect 47: 517-522 (1998).Applicant
• Gerscovich, “A Radiologist's Guide to the Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip,” Skeletal Radiol 26: 447-456 (1997).Applicant
• Ghelman et al., “Kinematics of the Knee After Prosthetic Replacements”, Clin. Orthop. May 1975: (108): 149-157.Applicant
• Ghosh et al., “Watershed Segmentation of High Resolution Articular Cartilage Images for Assessment of Osteoarthritis,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Philadelphia, (1999).Applicant
• Glaser et al., “Optimization and Validation of a Rapid Highresolution T1-W 3-D Flash Waterexcitation MR Sequence for the Quantitative Assessment of Articular Cartilage Volume and Thickness,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging 19: 177-185 (2001).Applicant
• Goodwin et al., “MR Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Striations in the Radial Layer Reflect the Fibrous Structure of Cartilage,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:546 (1999).Applicant
• Gouraud, “Continuous shading of curved surfaces,” IEEE Trans on Computers C-20(6) (1971).Applicant
• Graichen et al., “Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Width of the Subacromial Space in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Impingement Syndrome,” American Journal of Roentgenology 172: 1081-1086 (1999).Applicant
• Hall et al., “Quantitative MRI for Clinical Drug Trials of Joint Diseases; Virtual Biopsy of Articular Cartilage” NIH-FDA Conf. on Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints: Advancing Clinical Research and Applications (1998).Applicant
• Hardy et al., “Measuring the Thickness of Articular Cartilage From MR Images,” J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13: 120-126 (2001).Applicant
• Hardy et al., “The Influence of the Resolution and Contrast on Measuring the Articular Cartilage Volume in Magnetic Resonance Images” Magn Reson Imaging. 18(8): 965-972 (Oct. 2000).Applicant
• Hargreaves et al., “MR Imaging of Articular Cartilage Using Driven Equilibrium,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 42(4): 695-703 (Oct. 1999).Applicant
• Hargreaves et al., “Technical considerations for DEFT imaging,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia (Apr. 17-24, 1998).Applicant
• Hargreaves et al., “Imaging of articular cartilage using driven equilibrium,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia (Apr. 17-24, 1998).Applicant
• Hastings et al., “Double Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” A Survey of Fifty Consecutive Cases, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 55(1):112-118 (1973).Applicant
• Haubner M, et al., “A Non-Invasive Technique for 3-Dimensional Assessment of Articular Cartilage Thickness Based on MRI Part @: Validation Using CT Arthrography,” Magn Reson Imaging; 15(7): 805-813 (1997).Applicant
• Haut et al., “A High Accuracy Three-Dimensional Coordinate Digitizing System for Reconstructing the Geometry of Diarthrodial Joints,” J. Biomechanics 31: 571-577 (1998).Applicant
• Hayes et al., “Evaluation of Articular Cartilage: Radiographic and Cross-Sectional Imaging Techniques,” Radiographics 12: 409-428 (1992).Applicant
• Henderson et al., “Experience with the Use of the Macintosh Prosthesis in Knees of Patients with Pheumatoid Arthritis,” South. Med. J. 62(11):1311-1315 (1969).Applicant
• Henkelman, “Anisotropy of NMR Properties of Tissues”, Magn Res Med. 32: 592-601 (1994).Applicant
• Herberhold et al., “An MR-Based Technique for Quantifying the Deformation of Articular Cartilage During Mechanical Loading in an Intact Cadaver Joint,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 39(5): 843-850 (1998).Applicant
• Herberhold, “In Situ Measurement of Articular Cartilage Deformation in Intact Femorapatellar Joints Under Static Loading”, Journal of biomechanics 32: 1287-1295 (1999).Applicant
• Herrmann et al., “High Resolution Imaging of Normal and Osteoarthritic Cartilage with Optical Coherence Tomogrqaphy,” J. Rheumatoil 26: 627-635 (1999).Applicant
• High et al., “Early Macromolecular Collagen Changes in Articular Cartilage of Osteoarthritis (OA): An In Vivo MT-MRI and Histopathologic Study,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:550 (1999).Applicant
• Hohe, “Surface Size, Curvature Analysis, and Assessment of Knee Joint Incongruity With MR Imaging In Vivo”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 47: 554-561 (2002).Applicant
• Holdsworth et al., “Benefits of Articular Cartilage Imaging at 4 Tesla: An In Vivo Study of Normal Volunteers,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:1028 (1999).Applicant
• Hughes et al., “Technical Note: A Technique for Measuring the Surface Area of Articular Cartilage in Acetabular Fractures,” Br. J. Radiol; 67: 584-588 (1994).Applicant
• Husmann et al., “Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Proximal Femur,” J. Arthroplasty; 12(4): 444-450 (Jun. 1997).Applicant
• Hyhlik-Durr et al., “Precision of Tibial Cartilage Morphometry with a coronal water-excitation MR sequence,” European Radiology 10(2): 297-303 (2000).Applicant
• Ihara H., “Double-Contrast CT Arthrography of the Cartilage of the Patellofemoral Joint,” Clin. Orthop.; 198: 50-55 (Sep. 1985).Applicant
• Iida et al., “Socket Location in Total Hip Replacement: Preoperative Computed Tomography and Computer Simulation” Acta Orthop Scand; 59(1): 1-5 (1998).Applicant
• Irarrazabal et al., “Fast three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging,” Mag Res. Med. 33: 656-662 (1995).Applicant
• Jessop et al., “Follow-up of the MacIntosh Arthroplasty of the Knee Joint,” Rheumatol Phys. Med. 11(5):217-224 (1972).Applicant
• Johnson et al., “The distribution of load across the knee. A comparison of static and dynamic measurements,” J. Bone Joint Surg 62B: 346-349 (1980).Applicant
• Johnson, “In vivo contact kinematics of the knee joint: Advancing the point cluster technique,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota (1999).Applicant
• Johnson et al., “Development of a knee wear method based on prosthetic in vivo slip velocity,” Transaction of the Orthopedic Research Society, 46th Annual Meeting (Mar. 2000).Applicant
• Jonsson et al., “Precision of Hyaline Cartilage Thickness Measurements,” Acta Radiol 1992; 33(3): 234-239 (1992).Applicant
• Kaneuji et al., “Three Dimensional Morphological Analysis of the Proximal Femoral Canal, Using Computer-Aided Design System, in Japanese Patients with Osteoarthrosis of the Hip,” J. Orthop Sci; 5(4): 361-368 (2000).Applicant
• Karvonen et al., “Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Gross Pathology,” Ann Rheum Dis. 49: 672-675 (1990).Applicant
• Kass et al., “Snakes: Active contour models.,” Int J Comput Vision 1: 321-331 (1988).Applicant
• Kates, et al., “Experiences of Arthroplasty of the Rheumatoid Knee Using MacIntosh Prostheses,” Ann. Rheum. Dis. 28(3):328 (1969).Applicant
• Kaufman et al., “Articular Cartilage Sodium content as a function of compression” Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 1022, 1999 T. 105, V. III.Applicant
• Kay et al., The MacIntosh Tibial Plateau Hemiprosthesis for the Rheumatoid Knee, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 54(2):256-262 (1972).Applicant
• Kidder et al., “3D Model Acquisition, Design, Planning and Manufacturing of Orthopaedic Devices: A Framework,” Proceedings of the SPIE—Advanced Sensor and Control-System Interface, Boston, MA, vol. 2911, pp. 9-22, 21 (Nov. 1996).Applicant
• Klosterman et al., “T2 Measurements in Adult Patellar Cartilage at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla,” ISMRM Seventh Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, (May 22-28, 1999).Applicant
• Knauss et al., “Self-Diffusion of Water in Cartilage and Cartilage Components as Studied by Pulsed Field Gradient NMR,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 41:285-292 (1999).Applicant
• Koh et al., “Visualization by Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Focal Cartilage Lesions in the Excised Mini-Pig Knee,” J. Orthop. Res; 14(4): 554-561 (Jul. 1996).Applicant
• Korhonen et al., “Importance of the Superficial Tissue Layer for the Indentation Stiffness of Articular Cartilage,” Med. Eng. Phys; 24(2): 99-108 (Mar. 2002).Applicant
• Korkala et al., “Autogenous Osteoperiosteal Grafts in the Reconstruction of Full-Thickness Joint Surface Defects,” Int. Orthop.; 15(3): 233-237 (1991).Applicant
• Kshirsagar et al., “Measurement of Localized Cartilage Volume and Thickness of Human Knee Joints by Computer Analysis of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Images,” Invest Radiol. 33(5): 289-299 (May 1998).Applicant
• Kwak et al., “Anatomy of Human Patellofemoral Joint Articular Cartilage: Surface Curvature Analysis,” J. Orthop. Res.; 15: 468-472 (1997).Applicant
• LaFortune et al., “Three dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking,” J. Biomechanics 25: 347-357 (1992).Applicant
• Lam et al., “X-Ray Diagnosis: A Physician's Approach”, Editor Lam, 1998, Springer-Verlag publishers, Title page and Index Only (ISBN 9813083247).Applicant
• Lang et al., “Functional joint imaging: a new technique integrating MRI and biomotion studies,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Denver (Apr. 18-24, 2000).Applicant
• Lang et al., Risk factors for progression of cartilage loss: a longitudinal MRI study. European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, 6th Annual Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland (1999).Applicant
• Lang et al., Cartilage imaging: comparison of driven equilibrium with gradient-echo, SPAR, and fast spin-echo sequences. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia, (Apr. 17-24 1998).Applicant
• Ledingham et al., “Factors affecting radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis,” Ann Rheum Dis 54: 53-58 (1995).Applicant
• Leenslag et al., “A Porous Composite for Reconstruction of Meniscus Lesions,” Biological and Biomechanical Perform. of Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers Amsterdam pp. 147-152 (1986).Applicant
• Lefebvre et al., “Automatic Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Characterization of Articular Cartilage from High-Resolution Ultrasound Acquisitions,” Ultrasound Med. Biol.; 24(9): 1369-1381 (Nov. 1998).Applicant
• Li et al., A Boundary Optimization Algorithm for Delineating Brain Objects from CT Scans: Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference 1993 IEEE Conference Record, San Francisco, CA (1993).Applicant
• Lin et al., “Three-Dimensional Characteristics of Cartilagenous and Bony Components of Dysplastic Hips in Children: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantitative Analysis,” J. Pediatr. Orthop.; 17: 152-157 (1997).Applicant
• Lorensen et al., “Marching cubes: a high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm,” Comput Graph 21: 163-169 (1987).Applicant
• Losch et al., “A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI part 1: development of a computational method,” Magn Res Imaging 15(7): 795-804 (1997).Applicant
• Lu et al., “Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using globals optimization with joint constraints,” J Biomechanics 32: 129-134 (1999).Applicant
• Lu et al., “In vitro degradation of porous poly(L-lactic acid) foams”, Biomaterials, 21(15):1595-1605, Aug. 2000.Applicant
• Lucchetti et al., “Skin movement artifact assessment and compensation in the estimation of knee-joint kinematics,” J Biomechanics 31: 977-984 (1998).Applicant
• Lusse et al., “Measurement of Distribution of Water Content of Human Articular Cartilage Based on Transverse Relaxation Times: An In Vitro Study,” Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 1020 (1999).Applicant
• Lynch et al., “Cartilage segmentation of 3D MRI scans of the osteoarthritic knee combining user knowledge and active contours,” Proc. SPIE 3979 Medical Imaging, San Diego pp. 925-935 (Feb. 2000).Applicant
• MacIntosh, “Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Proceedings and Reports of Councils and Assotions, J. Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 48B No. (1): 179 (Feb. 1996).Applicant
• MacIntosh et al., “The Use of the Hemiarthroplasty Prosthesis for Advanced Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Knee,” J. of Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 54B, No. 2, pp. 244-255 (1972).Applicant
• MacIntosh, “Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using the Hemiarthroplasty Prosthesis,” Synovectomy and Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis pp. 79-80, Second Int'l. Symposium, Jan. 27-29, 1967 (Basle, Switzerland).Applicant
• MacIntosh, “Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee Using a Space Occupying Prosthesis for Painful Varus and Valgus Deformities,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. Dec. 1958:40-A:1431.Applicant
• Maki et al., “SNR improvement in NMR microscopy using DEFT,” J Mag Res; pp. 482-492 (1988).Applicant
• Marler et al., “Soft-Tissue Augmentation with Injectable Alginate and Syngeneic Fibroblasts”, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 105(6):2049-2058, May 2000.Applicant
• Marshall et al., “Quantitation of Articular Cartilage Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction,” J. Orthop. Res.; 13: 814-823 (1995).Applicant
• Matsen, III et al., “Robotic Assistance in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Proof of Principle Using Distal Femoral Arthroplasty”, Clinical Ortho. and Related Research, 296:178-186 (1993).Applicant
• Mattila et al., “Massive Osteoarticular Knee Allografts: Structural Changes Evaluated with CT,” Radiology; 196: 657-660 (1995).Applicant
• McCollum et al., “Tibial Plateau Prosthesis in Arthroplasty of the Knee,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1970 52(4):827-8 (Feb. 1996).Applicant
• McKeever, “The Classic Tibial Plateau Prosthesis,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (192):3-12 (1985).Applicant
• Merkle et al., “A Transceiver Coil Assembly for Hetero-Nuclear Investigations of Human Breast at 4T,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:170 (1999).Applicant
• Meyer et al., “Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation,” Magn Res Med 15: 287-304 (1990).Applicant
• Mills et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee: Evaluation of Meniscal Disease,” Curr. Opin. Radiol. 4(6): 77-82 (1992).Applicant
• Milz et al., “The Thickness of the Subchondral Plate and Its Correlation with the thickness of the Uncalcified Articular Cartilage in the Human Patella,” Anat. Embryol.; 192: 437-444 (1995).Applicant
• Minas, “Chondrocyte Implantation in the Repair of Chondral Lesions of the Knee: Economics and Quality of Life”, Am. J. Orthop. Nov. 1998; 27: 739-744.Applicant
• Modest et al., “Optical Verification of a Technique for In Situ Ultrasonic Measurement of Articular Cartilage Thickness,” J. Biomechanics 22(2): 171-176 (1989).Applicant
• Mollica et al., “Surgical treatment of arthritic varus knee by tibial corticotomy and angular distraction with an external fixator,” Ital J Orthrop Traumatol 18(1): 17-23 (1992).Applicant
• Moussa, “Rotational Malalignment and Femoral Torsion in Osteoarthritic Knees with Patellofemoral Joint Imvolvement: A CT Scan Study,” Clin. Orthop.; 304: 176-183 (Jul. 1994).Applicant
• Mundinger et al., “Magnetic Resonance Tomography in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Joints,” Schweiz Med. Wochenschr. 121(15): 517-527 (1991) (Abstract Only).Applicant
• Myers et al., “Experimental Assessment by High Frequency Ultrasound of Articular Cartilage Thickness and Osteoarthritic Changes,” J. Rheumatol; 22: 109-116 (1995).Applicant
• Nelson et al., “Arthroplasty and Arthrodesis of the Knee Joint,” Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2 (1): 245-64 (1971).Applicant
• Nieminen et al., “T2 Indicates Incompletely the Biomechanical Status of Enzymatically Degraded Articular Cartilage of 9.4T,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:551 (1999).Applicant
• Nishii et al., “Three Dimensional Evaluation of the Acetabular and Femoral Articular Cartilage in the Osteoarthritis of the Hip Joint,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:1030 (1999).Applicant
• Nizard, “Role of tibial osteotomy in the treatment of medical femorotibial osteoarthritis,” Rev Rhum Engl Ed 65(7-9): 443-446 (1998).Applicant
• Noll et al., “Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging,” IEEE Trans Med Imag 10(2): 154-163 (1991).Applicant
• Ogilvie-Harris et al., “Arthroscopic management of the degenerative knee,” Arthroscopy 7: 151-157 (1991).Applicant
• Parkkinen et al., “A Mechanical Apparatus With Microprocessor Controlled Stress Profile for Cyclic Compression of Cultured Articular Cartilage Explants,” J. Biomech.; 22 (11-12): 1285-1290 (1989).Applicant
• Pearle et al., “Use of an external MR-tracking coil for active scan plane registration during dynamic Musculoskeletal MR imaging in a vertically open MR unit,” American Roentgen Ray Society, San Francisco, CA (1998).Applicant
• Peterfy et al., “Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the carpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging,” AJR 165: 371-375 (1995).Applicant
• Peterfy et al., “MR Imaging of the arthritic knee: improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed TI-weighted sequences,” Radiology 191(2): 413-419 (1994).Applicant
• Peterfy et al. “Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation,” Radiology 192(2): 485-491 (1994).Applicant
• Peterfy et al. “Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Articular Cartilage,” Radiol Clin North Am.; 34(2): 195-213 (Mar. 1996).Applicant
• Pilch et al., “Assessment of Cartilage Volume in the Femorotibial Joint With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 3D Computer Reconstruction,” J. Rheumatol. 21(12): 2307-2319 (1994).Applicant
• Piplani et al., “Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semi-automated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images,” Radiology 198: 855-859 (1996).Applicant
• Platt et al., “Mould Arthroplasty of the Knee: A Ten-Yr Follow-up Study,” Oxford Regional Rheumatic Diseases Resch. Ctre, J. of Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 51B, pp. 76-87 (1969).Applicant
• Porter et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Review,” J. R. Coll. Surg. Edin. (192):199-201 (1988).Applicant
• Portheine et al., “CT-Based Planning and Individual Template Navigation in TKA”, Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery, Springer, 48:336-342 (2004).Applicant
• Portheine et al., “Development of a Clinical Demonstrator for Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery with CT Image Based Individual Templates.” In Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K (eds). Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Amsterdam, Elsevier 944-949, 1997.Applicant
• Potter, “Arthroplasty of the Knee With Tibial Metallic Implants of the McKeever and MacIntosh Design,” Sug. Clin. North Am. 49(4):903-915 (1969).Applicant
• Potter et al., “Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis: A Follow-up Study After Implantation of the McKeever and MacIntosh Prostheses,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 54(1):1-24 (1972).Applicant
• Potter et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee: an evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging,” J Bone Joint Surg 80-A(9): 1276-1284 (1998).Applicant
• Potter et al., “Sensitivity of Quantitative NMR Imaging to Matrix Composition in Engineered Cartilage Tissue” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:552 (1999).Applicant
• Probst et al., “Technique for Measuring the Area of Canine Articular Surfaces,” Am. J. Vet. Res. 48(4): 608-609 (1987).Applicant
• Prodromos et al., “A relationship between gait and clinical changes following high tibial osteotomy,” J Bone Joint Surg 67A: 1188-1194 (1985).Applicant
• Radermacher, English Translation: Helmholtz Institute of Biomedical Technology, “Computer-Assisted Planning and Execution of Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Surgical Templates”, May 18, 1999.Applicant
• Radermacher, German Version: Helmholtz Institute of Biomedical Technology, “Computer-Assisted Planning and Execution of Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Surgical Templates”, May 18, 1999.Applicant
• Radermacher, “Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery With Image Based Individual Templates” Clinical Orthopaedics, Sep. 1998, vol. 354, pp. 28-38.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Image Guided Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Templates—Experimental Results and Aspects of the Development of a Demonstrator for Pelvis Surgery.” In Troccaz J. Grimson E., Mosges R (eds). Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Springer-Verlag 606-615, 1997.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Computer Integrated Orthopedic Surgery—Connection of Planning and Execution in Surgical Inventions.” In Taylor, R., Lavallee, S., Burdea G. Mosges, R. (eds). Computer Integrated Surgery. Cambridge, MIT press 451-463, 1996.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Technique for Better Execution of CT Scan Planned Orthopedic Surgery on Bone Structures.” in Lemke HW, Inamura, K., Jaffe, CC, Vannier, MW (eds). Computer Assisted Radiology, Berlin, Springer 933-938, 1995.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “CT Image Based Planning and Execution of Interventions in Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Templates—Experimental Results and Aspects of Clinical Applications.” In Nolte LP, Ganz, R. (eds). CAOS—Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Bern, Hans Huber (In Press) 1998.Applicant
• Radin et al., “Mechanical Determination of Osteoarthrosis,” Sem Arthr Rheum 21(3): 12-21 (1991).Applicant
• Radin et al., Characteristics of Joint Loading as it Applies to Osteoarthrosis in: Mow VC, Woo S.Y., Ratcliffe T., eds. Symposium on Biomechanics of Diathrodial Joints, vol. 2, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 437-451 (1990).Applicant
• Ranawat et al., “MacIntosh Hemiarthroplasty in Rheumatoid Knee,” Acta Orthop Belg., 39 (1): 1-11 (1973).Applicant
• Recht et al., “Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities,” Radiology 198: 209-212 (1996).Applicant
• Recht et al., “MR imaging of articular cartilage: current status and future directions,” AJR 163: 283-290 (1994).Applicant
• Reiser et al., “Magnetic Resonance in Cartilaginous Lesions of the Knee Joint With Three-Dimensional Gradient-Echo Imaging,” Skeletal Radiol. 17(7): 465-471, (1988).Applicant
• Ritter et al., “Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement,” Clin Orthop 299: 153-156 (1994).Applicant
• Robarts Research Institute, Abstract #1028 (1999).Applicant
• Robson et al., “A Combined Analysis and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technique for Computerized Automatic Measurement of Cartilage Thickness in Distal Interphalangeal Joint,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13(5): 709-718 (1995).Applicant
• Rushfeldt et al., “Improved Techniques for Measuring In Vitro the Geometry and Pressure Distribution in the Human Acetabulum—1. Ultrasonic Measurement of Acetabular Surfaces, Sphericity and Cartilage Thickness,” J. Biomech; 14(4): 253-260 (1981).Applicant
• Saied, “Assessment of Articular Cartilage and Subchondral Bone: Subtle and Progressive Changes in Experimental Osteoarthritis Using 50 MHz Echography In Vitro”, J. Bone Miner Res. 1997; 12(9): 1378-1386.Applicant
• Saito et al., “New algorithms for Euclidean distance transformation of an—dimensional digitized picture with applications,” Pattern Recognition 27(11): 1551-1565 (1994).Applicant
• Schipplein et al., “Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking,” J Orthop Res 9: 113-119 (1991).Applicant
• Schorn et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Rheumatol Rehabil. Aug. 1978:17(3):155-163.Applicant
• Schouten et al., “A 12 year follow up study in the general population on prognostic factors of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis of the knee,” Ann Rheum Dis 51: 932-937 (1992).Applicant
• Shapiro et al., “In-Vivo Evaluation of Human Cartilage Compression and Recovery using 1H and 23Na MRI,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:548 (1999).Applicant
• Sharif et al., “Serum hyaluronic acid level as a predictor of disease progression in osteoarthritis of the knee,” Arthritis Rheum 38: 760-767 (1995).Applicant
• Sharma et al., “Knee adduction moment, serum hyaluronic acid level, and disease severity in medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism 41(7): 1233-40 (1998).Applicant
• Shoup et al., “The driven equilibrium Fourier transform NMR technique: an experimental study,” J Mag Res p. 298-310 (1972).Applicant
• Sittek et al., “Assessment of Normal Patellar Cartilage Volume and Thickness Using MRI: an Analysis of Currently Available Pulse Sequences”, Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 55-61.Applicant
• Slemenda et al., “Lower extremity lean tissue mass strength predict increases in pain and in functional impairment in knee osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Rheum 39(suppl): S212 (1996).Applicant
• Slemenda et al., “Lower extremity strength, lean tissue mass and bone density in progression of knee osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Rheum 39(suppl): S169 (1996).Applicant
• Slone et al., “Body CT: A Practical Approach”, Editor Slone, 1999 McGraw-Hill publishers, Title page and Table of Contents pgs. Only (ISBN 007058219).Applicant
• Solloway et al., “The use of active shape models for making thickness measurements of articular cartilage from MR images,” Mag Res Med 37: 943-952 (1997).Applicant
• Soslowsky et al., “Articular Geometry of the Glenohumeral Joint,” Clin. Orthop.; 285: 181-190 (Dec. 1992).Applicant
• Spoor et al., “Rigid body motion calculated from spatial coordinates of markers,” J. Biomechanics 13: 391-393 (1980).Applicant
• Stammberger et al., “A Method for Quantifying Time Dependent Changes in MR Signal Intensity of Articular Cartilage As a Function of Tissue Deformation in Intact Joints” Medical Engineering & Physics 20: 741-749 (1998).Applicant
• Stammberger et al., “A New Method for 3D Cartilage Thickness Measurement with MRI, Based on Euclidean Distance Transformation, and its Reproducibility in the Living,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 6:562 (1998).Applicant
• Stammberger et al., “Elastic Registration of 3D Cartilage Surfaces From MR Image Data for Detecting Local Changes of the Cartilage Thickness,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 44: 592-601 (2000).Applicant
• Stammberger et al., “Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: computational method and reproducibility in the living,” Mag Res Med 41: 529-536 (1999).Applicant
• Stammberger et al., “Interobserver to reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: Comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation,” Mag Res Imaging 17: 1033-1042 (1999).Applicant
• Stauffer et al., “The MacIntosh Prosthesis. Prospective Clinical and Gait Evaluation,” Arch. Surg. 110(6):717-720 (1975).Applicant
• Steines et al., Segmentation of osteoarthritic femoral cartilage using live wire, Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 8:220 (2000).Applicant
• Steines et al., “Segmentation of osteoarthritis femoral cartilage from MR images,” CARS—Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery, pp. 578-583, San Francisco (2000).Applicant
• Steines et al., “Measuring volume of articular cartilage defects in osteoarthritis using MRI,” ACR 64th Annual Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, (Oct. 2000).Applicant
• Stevenson et al., “The fate of articular cartilage after transplantation of fresh and cryopreserved tissue-antigen-matched and mismatched osteochondral allografts in dogs,” J. Bone Joint Surg 71(9): 1297-1307 (1989).Applicant
• Stout et al., “X-Ray Structure Determination: A Practical Guide”, 2nd Ed. Editors Stout and Jensen, 1989, John Wiley & Sons, Title page and Table of Contents pgs. Only (ISBN 0471607118).Applicant
• Taha et al., “Modeling and Design of a Custom Made Cranium Implant for Large Skull Reconstruction Before a Tumor Removal”, Phidias Newsletter No. 6, pp. 3, 6, Jun. 2001. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.materialise.com/medical/files/pdf.Applicant
• Tamez-Pena et al., MRI Isotropic Resolution Reconstruction from two Orthogonal Scans:, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering SOIE-OMT. vol. 4322, pp. 87-97, 2001.Applicant
• Tebben et al., “Three-Dimensional Computerized Reconstruction. Illustration of Incremental Articular Cartilage Thinning,” Invest. Radiol. 32(8): 475-484 (1997).Applicant
• Tieschky et al., “Repeatability of patellar cartilage thickness patterns in the living, using a fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging sequence with short acquisition time and three-dimensional data processing,” J. Orthop Res 15(6): 808-813 (1997).Applicant
• Tomasi et al., “Shape and motion from image streams under orthography—a factorization method,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 90(21): 9795-9802 (1993).Applicant
• Tsai et al., “Application of a flexible loop-gap resonator for MR imaging of articular cartilage at 3.TO,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Denver (Apr. 24-28, 2000) 8:2127.Applicant
• Tyler et al., “Detection and Monitoring of Progressive Degeneration of Osteoarthritic Cartilage by MRI,” Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 Suppl. 266: 130-138 (1995).Applicant
• Van Leersum et al., “Thickness of Patellofemoral Articular Cartilage as Measured on MR Imaging: Sequence Comparison of accuracy, reproducibility, and interobserver variation,” Skeletal Radiol 1995; 24: 431-435 (1995).Applicant
• Vandeberg et al., “Assessment of Knee Cartilage in Cadavers with Dual-Detector Sprial CT ARthrography and MR Imaging”, Radiology, Feb. 2002: 222(2): 430-435 T. 195, V.V.Applicant
• Van der Linden et al., “MR Imaging of Hyaline Cartilage at 0.5 T: A Quantitative and Qualitative in vitro Evaluation of Three Types of Sequences” pp. 297-305 (Jun. 1998).Applicant
• Velyvis et al., “Evaluation of Articular Cartilage with Delayed Gd(DTPA)2-Enhanced MRI: Promise and Pitfalls,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:554 (1999).Applicant
• Wang et al., “The influence of walking mechanics and time on the results of proximal tibial osteotomy,” J. Bone Joint Surg 72A: 905-909 (1990).Applicant
• Warfield et al., “Automatic Segmentation of MRI of the Knee,” ISMRM Sixth Scientific Meeting and Exhibition p. 563, Sydney, Australia (Apr. 17-24, 1998).Applicant
• Warfield et al., “Adaptive Template Moderated Spatially Varying Statistical Classification,” Proc. First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted, MICCAI, pp. 231-238 (1998).Applicant
• Warfield et al., “Adaptive, Template Moderated Spatially Varying Statistical Classification,” Medical Image Analysis 4(1): 43-55 (2000).Applicant
• Waterton et al., “Diurnal variation in the femoral articular cartilage of the knee in young adult humans,” Mag Res Med 43: 126-132 (2000).Applicant
• Waterton et al., “Magnetic Resonance Methods for Measurement of Disease Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Mag. Res. Imaging; 11: 1033-1038 (1993).Applicant
• Watson et al., “MR Protocols for Imaging the Guinea Pig Knee,” Mag. Res. Imaging 15(8): 957-970 (1997).Applicant
• Wayne et al., “Measurement of Articular Cartilage Thickness in the Articulated Knee,” ANN Biomed Eng.; 26(1): 96-102 (1998).Applicant
• Wayne et al., “Finite Element Analyses of Repaired Articular Surfaces,” Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng.; 205(3): 155-162 (1991).Applicant
• Wiese et al., “Biomaterial properties and biocompatibility in cell culture of a novel self-inflating hydrogel tissue expander”, J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 54(2):179-188, Nov. 2000.Applicant
• Wolff et al., “Magnetization transfer contrast: MR imaging of the knee,” Radiology 179: 623-628 (1991).Applicant
• Wordsworth et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty for the Rheumatoid Knee: A 10-year Follow Up,” Ann. Rheum. Dis. 44(11):738-741 (1985).Applicant
• Worring et al., “Digital curvature estimation. CVGIP,” Image Understanding 58(3): 366-382 (1993).Applicant
• Yan, “Measuring changes in local volumetric bone density,” new approaches to quantitative computed tomography, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University (1998).Applicant
• Yao et al., “Incidental magnetization transfer contrast in fast spin-echo imaging of cartilage,” J. Magn Reson Imaging 6(1): 180-184 (1996).Applicant
• Yao et al., “MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5T,” AJR 158(2): 339-345 (1992).Applicant
• Yasuda et al., “A 10 to 15 year follow up observation of high tibial osteotomy in medial compartment osteoarthritis,” Clin Orthop 282: 186-195 (1992).Applicant
• Yusof et al., “Preparation and characterization of chitin beads as a wound dressing precursor”, J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 54(1):59-68, Oct. 2000.Applicant
• Zimmer, Inc., “There's a New Addition to the Flex Family! The Zimmer® Unicompartmental Knee System”, pp. 1-8 (2004).Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US02/16945, dated Mar. 26, 2003, 6 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report—Application No. 03713907.8, dated Dec. 6, 2006, 3 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Supplementary Partial European Search Report—Application No. 02737254.9, dated Mar. 2, 2007, 5 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US03/38158, dated Feb. 23, 2005, 7 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, European Search Report—Application No. EP 03790194, dated Jul. 13, 2006, 7 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US03/32123, dated Mar. 17, 2004, 7 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US03/36079, dated Apr. 15, 2004, 7 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US04/39714, dated May 13, 2005, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 8 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2005/042421, dated May 18, 2006, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 7 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report—Application No. 04812273.3, dated Oct. 8, 2007, 5 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees—International Application No. PCT/US2007/064349 dated Aug. 7, 2007, 8 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2007/064349, dated Oct. 12, 2007, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 20 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report—Application No. 04812273.3-2310, dated Dec. 10, 2007, 7 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US06/45131, dated Jul. 11, 2007, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 6 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US06/38212, dated Apr. 22, 2008, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 7 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability—International Application No. PCT/US2006/045131, dated Jun. 5, 2008, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 6 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2009/043656, dated Jul. 9, 2009, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 8 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office Office, Action dated Jul. 30, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,318, 56 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Request for Continued Examination and Response dated Aug. 27, 2009 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,438, 22 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2009 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,438, 8 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Request for Continued Examination and Response dated Jul. 27, 2009 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,407, 26 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2009 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,407, 14 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (US Patent Publication No. US 2004/0167390), 11 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (US Patent Publication No. US 2004/0167390), 25 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (US Patent Publication No. US 2004/0167390), 13 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/160,667, 5 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment dated Jan. 11, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/160,667, 12 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,749, 6 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,749, 18 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,750, 21 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,750, 17 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,750, 21 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, European Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2006/045131 dated Mar. 3, 2010, 6 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,208, 23 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Request for Continued Examination and Response dated Oct. 26, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,208, 17 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,208, 10 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/025459, dated Apr. 20, 2010, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 15 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Request for Continued Examination dated May 24, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 21 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 6 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 10 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 6 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 17 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Supplemental Response dated May 2, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 12 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 10 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Amendment After Final Rejection dated Aug. 26, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 17 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,325, 11 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,325, 15 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated May 17, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,325, 20 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,416, 7 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/160,667, 11 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,472, 7 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,407, 12 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated May 26, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/602,713, 10 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,438, 9 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,340, 15 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,318, 9 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,318, 10 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/039587, dated Aug. 19, 2010, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 15 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—European Application No. 06815884.9-2310, dated Sep. 14, 2010, 7 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,208, 13 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/025274, dated Sep. 20, 2010, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 18 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Preliminary Amendment dated Jul. 31, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/739,326, 19 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/739,326, 13 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/739,326, 22 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 24, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/739,326, 8 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated May 17, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, 12 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated May 17, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10,764,010, 21 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 16, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, 11 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,472, 15 pages.Applicant
• Brandt et al., In German: “CRIGOS—Development of a Compact Robot System for Image-Guided Orthopedic Surgery,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 645-649 (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• Brandt et al., English Translation with Certification: “CRIGOS—Development of a Compact Robot System for Image-Guided Orthopedic Surgery,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 645-649 (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• CAOS, “MIS meets CAOS Spring 2005 Symposium Schedule”, CAOS Spring 2005 Symposium, pp. 1-9, May 19, 2005.Applicant
• Chelule et al., “Patient-Specific Template to Preserve Bone Stock in Total Knee Replacement: Preliminary Results”, 15th Annual ISTA Symposium, Sep. 2002, 1 page.Applicant
• Hafez et al., “Computer Assisted Total Knee Replacement: Could a Two-Piece Custom Template Replace the Complex Conventional Instrumentations?” Session 6: Novel Instruments; Computer Aided Surgery, Session 6, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 93-94 (Jun. 2004).Applicant
• Hafez et al., “Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Patient-specific Templating,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 444, pp. 184-192 (Mar. 2006).Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery by Means of Individual Templates •Aspects and Analysis of Potential Applications •” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 1: Sessions I-III, MRCAS '94, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 42-48 (Sep. 22-24, 1994).Applicant
• Schiffers et al., In German: “Planning and execution of orthopedic surgery using individualized templates,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 636-640, (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• Schiffers et al., English Translation with Certification: “Planning and execution of orthopedic surgery using individualized templates,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 636-640, (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• Thoma et al., In German: “Use of a New Subtraction Procedure Based on Three-Dimensional CT Scans for the Individual Treatment of Bone Defects in the Hip and Knee,” Journal DGPW, No. 17, pp. 27-28 (May 1999).Applicant
• Thoma et al., English Translation with Certification: “Use of a New Subtraction Procedure Based on Three-Dimensional CT Scans for the Individual Treatment of Bone Defects in the Hip and Knee,” Journal DGPW, No. 17, pp. 27-28 (May 1999).Applicant
• Thoma et al., In German: “Custom-made knee endoprosthetics using subtraction data of three-dimensional CT scans—A new approach,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 641-644, (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• Thoma et al., English Translation with Certification: “Custom-made knee endoprosthetics using subtraction data of three-dimensional CT scans—A new approach,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 641-644, (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,416, 10 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/046868, dated Jan. 7, 2011, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 11 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/602,713, 10 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,472, 12 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,438, 8 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action date Apr. 18, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,763, 13 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—European Application No. 10012404.9-2310, dated Apr. 1, 2011, 7 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 5, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, 14 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/055483, dated Jul. 28, 2011, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 9 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,407, 13 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,599, 11 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Response to Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,599, 16 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 14, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,599, 9 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Preliminary Amendment dated Aug. 22, 2006, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 10 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 32 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Amendment dated Jun. 30, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 18 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Supplemental Amendment dated Aug. 26, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 11 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Supplemental Amendment dated Sep. 21, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 11 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 43 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment dated Jun. 28, 2010 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 16 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2010 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 20 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment dated Apr. 6, 2011 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 12 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Preliminary Amendment dated Jul. 31, 2009 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,434, 44 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2010 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,434, 83 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment dated Feb. 2, 2011 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,434, 44 pages.Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Preliminary Amendment dated Aug. 12, 2011, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/017,886, 13 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2011 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, 13 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2010/059910 dated Oct. 25, 2011, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 9 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/025269 dated Aug. 31, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 14 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/049472 dated Oct. 16, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 12 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/050964 dated Oct. 22, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 13 pages.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 10/752,438, filed Jan. 5, 2004.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,416, filed Dec. 22, 2008.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/317,472, filed Dec. 22, 2008.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/712,072, filed Feb. 24, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/660,529, filed Feb. 25, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,413, filed Mar. 9, 2011.Applicant
• Radermacher, et al., “Image Guided Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Templates—Experimental Results and Aspects of Development of a Demonstrator for Pelvis Surgery”, In Troccaz J. Grimson E., Mosges R (eds). Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Springer—Verlag 606-616, 1997.Applicant
• Tsai, et al., “Accurate Surface Voxelization for Manipulating Volumetric Surfaces and Solids with Application in Simulating Musculoskeletal Surgery”, IEEE, May 2001, pp. 234-243.Applicant
• U.S. Patent & Trademark Office Non Final, Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,501, date of notification Apr. 26, 2013, 78 pages.Applicant
• Cohen et al., “Computer-Aided Planning of Patellofemoral Joint OA Surgery: Developing Physical Models from Patient MRI”, MICCAI, Oct. 11-13, 1998, 13 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, European Search Report—Application No. 10192339.9-1257, dated Jan. 23, 2013, 5 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 10792589.3-2310, dated Feb. 7, 2013, 9 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 10746859.7-1654, dated Mar. 4, 2013, 7 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, European Search Report—Application No. 12170854.9-1526, dated Oct. 9, 2012, 6 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US12/59936 dated Jan. 9, 2013, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 11 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/025280 dated Oct. 25, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 11 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 12192903.8-1654 dated Apr. 17, 2013, 8 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2009/036165 dated May 7, 2009, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 9 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/025274 dated Oct. 25, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 12 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2012/025277 dated Oct. 25, 2012, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 12 pages.Applicant
• Ateshian et al., “Quantitation of Articular Surface Topography and Cartilage Thickenss in Knee Joints Using Stereophotogammetry,” Biomechanics, 24(8): 761-776 (1991).Applicant
• Ateshian et al., “Curvature Characteristics and Congruence of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint-Differences Between Female and Male Joints,” J. Biomechanics 25(6): 591-607 (1992).Applicant
• Ateshian et al., “A B-Spline Least-Squares Surface-Fitting Method for Articular Surfaces of Diarthrodial Joints,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering Division, Transactions of the ASME 115: 366-373 (Nov. 1993).Applicant
• Hafez et al., “Computer Assisted Total Knee Replacement: Could a Two-Piece Custom Template Replace the Complex Conventional Instrumentations?”, 4th Annual Meeting of CAOS Int'l Proc., Chicago, Jun. 16-19, 2004, pp. 63-64.Applicant
• Hafez et al., “Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Present and the Future”, Future Rheumatol., vol. 1, pp. 121-131, 2006.Applicant
• Portheine et al., In German: “Potentials of CT-based Planning and Template-based Procedure in Hip and Knee Surgery”, Orth. Prac., vol. 36, pp. 786-791, 2000.Applicant
• Portheine et al., English Translation with Certification: “Potentials of CT-based Planning and Template-based Procedure in Hip and Knee Surgery”, Orth. Prac., vol. 36, pp. 786-791, 2000.Applicant
• Portheine, In German: “Model-Based Operation Planning in Orthopedic Surgery”, Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Apr. 22, 2004, 90 pages.Applicant
• Portheine, English Translation with Certification: “Model-Based Operation Planning in Orthopedic Surgery”, Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Apr. 22, 2004, 170 pages.Applicant
• Portheine et al., In German: “Computer-Assisted Total Knee Endoprosthetics with Planning-Specific Treatment Templates”, Biomed. Tech., vol. 46, Supp. vol. 1, Jan. 2001.Applicant
• Portheine et al., English Translation with Certification: “Computer-Assisted Total Knee Endoprosthetics with Planning-Specific Treatment Templates”, Biomed. Tech., vol. 46, Supp. vol. 1, Jan. 2001.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Computer Integrated Surgery—Connecting Planning and Execution of Surgical Intervention in Orthopedics”, Surgical Therapy Technology, Helmholtz-Institut Aachen Research Report, 1991-1992, pp. 187, 196-202.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Computer Assisted Matching of Planning and Execution in Orthopedic Surgery”, IEEE, EMBS, San Diego, 1993, pp. 946-947.Applicant
• Radermacher, “Computer Assisted Matching of Planning and Execution in Orthopedic Surgery”, Slide Presentation, San Diego, Nov. 29, 1993, 22 pages.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Computer Integrated Advanced Orthopedics (CIAO)”, 2nd European Conference on Eng. And Med., presented Apr. 26, 1993, 12 pages.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Surgical Therapy Technology”, Helmholtz-Institut Aachen Research Report, 1993-1994, pp. 189-219.Applicant
• Radermacher, “Image Guided Orthopedic Surgery with Individual Templates”, Helmhotz-Institute for Biomed. Eng., 2 pages, 1997.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., In German: “Computer-assisted operative interventions in orthopedics—are there prospects for endoprosthetics as well?”, Prac. Ortho., vol. 27, pp. 149-164, 1997.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., English Translation with Certification: “Computer-assisted operative interventions in orthopedics—are there prospects for endoprosthetics as well?”, Prac. Ortho., vol. 27, pp. 1-17, 1997.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Computer Based Decision Support for the Planning of Contact Faces for Manual Registration with Individual Templates”, Helmholtz-Institute for Biomed. Eng., 7 pages, 1997-98.Applicant
• Radermacher, In German: “Computer-Based Decision Support in the Selection and Evaluation of Contact Surfaces for Manual Referencing”, Lecture presented at Helmholtz Meeting '98 and OSS '98, 7 pages.Applicant
• Radermacher, English Translation with Certification: “Computer-Based Decision Support in the Selection and Evaluation of Contact Surfaces for Manual Referencing”, Lecture presented at Helmholtz Meeting '98 and OSS '98, 8 pages.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., In German: “Computer-Assisted Planning and Operation in Orthopedics”, Orth. Prac. 36th year, pp. 731-737, Dec. 2000.Applicant
• Radermacher et al., English Translation with Certification: “Computer-Assisted Planning and Operation in Orthopedics”, Orth. Prac. 36th year, pp. 731-737, Dec. 2000.Applicant
• Radermacher, “Template Based Navigation—An Efficient Technique for Hip and Knee Surgery”, CAOS First Asian Meet, India, Mar. 27-28, 2004, pp. 44-50.Applicant
• Delp et al., “A Graphics-Based Software System to Develop and Analyze Models of Musculoskeletal Structures,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 21-34, 1995.Applicant
• Overhoff et al., “Total Knee Arthroplasty: Coordinate System Definition and Planning Based on 3-D Ultrasound Image Volumes”, CARS 2001, pp. 283-288.Applicant
• Robinson et al., “The Early Innovators of Today's Resurfacing Condylar Knees”, The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 20, No. 1, Suppl. 1, 2005.Applicant
• European Patent Office, European Search Report—Application No. 10829105.5-1654 dated Nov. 5, 2013, 3 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 10838327.4-1654 dated Nov. 14, 2013, 6 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 13164557.4-1659 dated Nov. 25, 2013, 8 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 13167237.0-1659 dated Nov. 25, 2013, 8 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 13167246.1-1659 dated Nov. 25, 2013, 8 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report—Application No. 13167257.8-1659 dated Nov. 25, 2013, 8 pages.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 10/160,667, filed May 28, 2002.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 10/681,750, filed Oct. 7, 2003.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 10/704,208, filed Nov. 7, 2003.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,407, filed Nov. 24, 2004.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,318, filed Sep. 29, 2006.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,340, filed Mar. 20, 2007.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 11/602,713, filed Nov. 21, 2006.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,239, filed Feb. 14, 2008.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/398,598, filed Mar. 5, 2009.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/398,871, filed Mar. 5, 2009.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/398,880, filed Mar. 5, 2009.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/464,763, filed May 12, 2009.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/777,809, filed May 11, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/777,859, filed May 11, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/777,878, filed May 11, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,506, filed May 12, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,518, filed May 12, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,299, filed Apr. 21, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,355, filed Apr. 22, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,641, filed Apr. 28, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,301, filed Jun. 23, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,493, filed Dec. 10, 2010.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/013,435, filed Jan. 25, 2011.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/014,466, filed Jan. 26, 2011.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,857, filed Jun. 10, 2011.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/207,396, filed Aug. 10, 2011.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,501, filed Nov. 29, 2011.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,339, filed Dec. 6, 2011.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,564, filed Nov. 11, 2011.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,573, filed Nov. 11, 2011.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,579, filed Nov. 11, 2011.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,617, filed Nov. 11, 2011.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,623, filed Nov. 11, 2011.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,457, filed Feb. 15, 2012.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/399,378, filed Feb. 17, 2012.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,696, filed Jul. 30, 2012.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,840, filed Aug. 3, 2012.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/718,717, filed Dec. 18, 2012.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/718,735, filed Dec. 18, 2012.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/746,742, filed Jan. 22, 2013.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/761,818, filed Feb. 7, 2013.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,863, filed Mar. 15, 2013.Applicant
• U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,712, filed May 6, 2013.Applicant