Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment

Patent Citations (636)

Non-Patent Literature (372)

• Reddy et al., “Triple Quantum Sodium Imaging of Articular Cartilage”, 1997, University of Pennsylvania, MRM 38:279-284.Examiner
• Sharif et al., “Serum hyaluronic acid level as a predictor of disease progression in osteoarthritis of the knee”, Jun. 1995, Arthiritis Rheum., 38(6):760-7.Examiner
• Andersson et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Acta. Orthrop. Scand. 45(2):245-259 (1974).Applicant
• Argenson et al., “Is There a Place for Patellofemoral Arthroplasty?,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research No. 321, pp. 162-167 (1995).Applicant
• Bashir, “Validation of Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of FAF Measurement in Human Cartilage,” Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med. (1998).Applicant
• Billet, Philippe, French Version—“Gliding Knee Prostheses—Analysis of Mechanical Failures”, Thesis, Medical School of Marseilles, 1982, 64 pages.Applicant
• Billet, Philippe, Translated Version—“Gliding Knee Prostheses—Analysis of Mechanical Failures”, Thesis, Medical School of Marseilles, 1982, 64 pages.Applicant
• Blazina et al., “Patellofemoral replacement: Utilizing a customized femoral groove replacement,” 5(1)53-55 (1990).Applicant
• Blum et al., “Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis,” ANN. Rheum. Dis. 33 (1): 1-11 (1974).Applicant
• Bogoch, et al., “Supracondylar Fractures of the Femur Adjacent to Resurfacing and MacIntosh Arthroplasties of the Knee in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Clin. Orthop. (229):213-220 (Apr. 1988).Applicant
• Brett et al., “Quantitative Analysis of Biomedical Images,” Univ. of Manchester, Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, IBM UK, http://www.wiau.man ac.uk/˜ads/imv (1998).Applicant
• Brown, Ph.D., et al., “MRI Basic Principles and Applications”, Second Ed., Mark A. Brown and Richard C. Semelka, 1999, Wiley-Liss Inc., Title page and Table of Contents Pages Only (ISBN 0471330620).Applicant
• Butterworth et al., “A T1O2 Dielectric-Filled Toroidal Resonator,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:169 (1999).Applicant
• Cameron, et al., “Review of a Failed Knee Replacement and Some Observations on the Design of a Knee Resurfacing Prosthesis,” Arch. Orthop Trauma Surg. 97(2):87-89 (1980).Applicant
• Carr et al., “Surface Interpolation with Radial Basis Functions for Medical Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, IEEE, Inc. New York, vol. 16, pp. 96-107 (Feb. 1997).Applicant
• Clary et al., “Experience with the MacIntosh Knee Prosthesis,” South Med. J. 65(3):265-272 (1972).Applicant
• Conaty, et al., “Surgery of the Hip and Knee in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 55(2):301-314 (1973).Applicant
• De Winter et al. “The Richards Type II Patellofemoral Arthroplasty”, Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72 (5): 487-490.Applicant
• Delp et al., “A Graphics-Based Software System to Develop and Analyze Models of Musculoskeletal Structures,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 21-34, 1995.Applicant
• Farrar et al., “Computed Tomography Scan Scout Film for Measurement of Femoral Axis in Knee Arthroplasty,” J. Arthroplasty, vol. 14, No. 8, pp. 1030-1031, 1999.Applicant
• Ghelman et al., “Kinematics of the Knee After Prosthetic Replacements”, Clin. Orthop. May 1975: (108): 149-157.Applicant
• Goodwin et al., “MR Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Striations in the Radial Layer Reflect the Fibrous Structure of Cartilage,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:546 (1999).Applicant
• Hall et al., “Quantitative MRI for Clinical Drug Trials of Joint Diseases; Virtual Biopsy of Articular Cartilage” NIH-FDA Conf. on Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints: Advancing Clinical Research and Applications (1998).Applicant
• Hastings et al., “Double Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” A Survey of Fifty Consecutive Cases, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 55(1):112-118 (1973).Applicant
• Henderson et al., “Experience with the Use of the Macintosh Prosthesis in Knees of Patients with Pheumatoid Arthritis,” South. Med. J. 62(11):1311-1315 (1969).Applicant
• High et al., “Early Macromolecular Collagen Changes in Articular Cartilage of Osteoarthritis (OA): An In Vivo MT-MRI and Histopathologic Study,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:550 (1999).Applicant
• Holdsworth et al., “Benefits of Articular Cartilage Imaging at 4 Tesla: An In Vivo Study of Normal Volunteers,” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:1028 (1999).Applicant
• Jessop et al., “Follow-up of the MacIntosh Arthroplasty of the Knee Joint,” Rheumatol Phys. Med. 11(5):217-224 (1972).Applicant
• Kates, et al., “Experiences of Arthroplasty of the Rheumatoid Knee Using MacIntosh Prostheses,” Ann. Rheum. Dis. 28(3):328 (1969).Applicant
• Kay et al., The MacIntosh Tibial Plateau Hemiprosthesis for the Rheumatoid Knee, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 54(2):256-262 (1972).Applicant
• Kidder et al., “3D Model Acquisition, Design, Planning and Manufacturing of Orthopaedic Devices: A Framework,” Proceedings of the SPIE—Advanced Sensor and Control-System Interface, Boston, MA, vol. 2911, pp. 9-22, 21 (Nov. 1996).Applicant
• Kim et al., “Measurement of Femoral Neck Anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D Imaging Method,” Med. and Viol. Eng. and Computing, vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 603-609, 2000.Applicant
• Lam et al., “X-Ray Diagnosis: A Physician's Approach”, Editor Lam, 1998, Springer-Verlag publishers, Title page and Table of Contents pgs. Only (ISBN 9813083247).Applicant
• Lam et al., “Varus/Valgus Alignment of the Femoral Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty,” The Knee, vol. 10, pp. 237-241, 2003.Applicant
• Leenslag et al., “A Porous Composite for Reconstruction of Meniscus Lesions,” Biological and Biomechanical Perform. of Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers Amsterdam pp. 147-152 (1986).Applicant
• Lu et al., “In vitro degradation of porous poly(L-lactic acid) foams”, Biomaterials, 21(15):1595-1605, Aug. 2000.Applicant
• MacIntosh, “Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Proceedings and Reports of Councils and Assotions, J. Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 48B No. (1): 179 (Feb. 1966).Applicant
• MacIntosh et al., “The Use of the Hemiarthroplasty Prosthesis for Advanced Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Knee,” J. of Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 54B, No. 2, pp. 244-255 (1972).Applicant
• MacIntosh, “Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using the Hemiarthroplasty Prosthesis,” Synovectomy and Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis pp. 79-80, Second Int'l. Symposium, Jan. 27-29, 1967 (Basle, Switzerland).Applicant
• MacIntosh, “Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee Using a Space Occupying Prosthesis for Painful Varus and Valgus Deformities,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. Dec. 1958:40-A:1431.Applicant
• Mahaisavariya et al., “Morphological Study of the Proximal Femur: A New Method of Geometrical Assessment Using 3 Dimensional Reverse Engineering,” Med. Eng. and Phys., vol. 24, pp. 617-622, 2002.Applicant
• Marler et al., “Soft-Tissue Augmentation with Injectable Alginate and Syngeneic Fibroblasts”, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 105(6):2049-2058, May 2000.Applicant
• Matsen, III et al., “Robotic Assistance in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Proof of Principle Using Distal Femoral Arthroplasty”, Clinical Ortho. and Related Research, 296:178-186 (1993).Applicant
• McCollum et al., “Tibial Plateau Prosthesis in Arthroplasty of the Knee,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1970 52(4):827-8 (Feb. 1996).Applicant
• McKeever, “The Classic Tibial Plateau Prosthesis,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (192):3-12 (1985).Applicant
• Nelson et al., “Arthroplasty and Arthrodesis of the Knee Joint,” Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2 (1): 245-64 (1971.Applicant
• Platt et al., “Mould Arthroplasty of the Knee: A Ten-Yr Follow-up Study,” Oxford Regional Rheumatic Diseases Resch. Ctre, J. of Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 51B, pp. 76-87 (1969).Applicant
• Porter et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Review,” J. R. Coll. Surg. Edin. (192):199-201 (1988).Applicant
• Portheine et al., “CT-Based Planning and Individual Template Navigation in TKA”, Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery, Springer, 48:336-342 (2004).Applicant
• Portheine et al., “Development of a Clinical Demonstrator for Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery with CT Image Based Individual Templates,” Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Amsterdam, Elsevier 944-949 (1997).Applicant
• Potter, “Arthroplasty of the Knee With Tibial Metallic Implants of the McKeever and MacIntosh Design,” Sug. Clin. North Am. 49(4):903-915 (1969).Applicant
• Potter et al., “Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis: A Follow-up Study After Implantation of the McKeever and MacIntosh Prostheses,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 54(1):1-24 (1972).Applicant
• Radermacher, K., German Version: “Computer-Assisted Planning and Execution of Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Surgical Templates,” Helmholtz Institute of Biomedical Technology (May 18, 1999).Applicant
• Radermacher, K., English Translation: “Computer-Assisted Planning and Execution of Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Surgical Templates,” Helmholtz Institute of Biomedical Technology (May 18, 1999).Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery With Image Based Individual Templates” Clinical Orthopaedics, vol. 354, pp. 28-38 (Sep. 1998).Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Image Guided Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Templates—Experimental Results and Aspects of the Development of a Demonstrator for Pelvis Surgery,” Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Springer-Verlag 606-616 (1997).Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Computer Integrated Orthopedic Surgery—Connection of Planning and Execution in Surgical Inventions,” Computer Integrated Surgery, MIT Press, pp. 451-463 (1996).Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Technique for Better Execution of CT Scan Planned Orthopedic Surgery on Bone Structures,” Computer Assisted Radiology, Berlin, Springer, pp. 933-938 (1995).Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “CT Image Based Planning and Execution of Interventions in Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Templates—Experimental Results and a spects of Clinical Applications,” Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Bern, Hans Huber (1998).Applicant
• Ranawat et al., “MacIntosh Hemiarthroplasty in Rheumatoid Knee,” Acta Orthop Belg., 39 (1): 1-11 (1973).Applicant
• Robarts Research Institute, Abstract #1028 (1999).Applicant
• Schorn et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Rheumatol Rehabil. Aug. 1978:17(3):155-163.Applicant
• Slone et al., “Body CT: A Practical Approach”, Editor Slone, 1999 McGraw-Hill publishers, Title page and Table of Contents pgs. Only (ISBN 007058219).Applicant
• Stauffer et al., “The MacIntosh Prosthesis. Prospective Clinical and Gait Evaluation,” Arch. Surg. 110(6):717-720 (1975).Applicant
• Stout et al., “X-Ray Structure Determination: A Practical Guide”, 2nd Ed. Editors Stout and Jensen, 1989, John Wiley & Sons, Title page and Table of Contents pgs. Only (ISBN 0471607118).Applicant
• Taha et al., “Modeling and Design of a Custom Made Cranium Implant for Large Skull Reconstruction Before a Tumor Removal”, Phidias Newsletter No. 6, pp. 3, 6, Jun. 2001. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.materialise.com/medical/files/pdf.Applicant
• Tamez-Pena et al., MRI Isotropic Resolution Reconstruction from two Orthogonal Scans:, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering SOIE-OMT. vol. 4322, pp. 87-97, 2001.Applicant
• Testi et al., “Border Tracing Algorithm Implementation for the Femoral Geometry Reconstruction,” Comp. Meth. and Programs in Biomed., vol. 65, pp. 175-182, 2001.Applicant
• Wiese et al., “Biomaterial properties and biocompatibility in cell culture of a novel self-inflating hydrogel tissue expander”, J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 54(2):179-188, Nov. 2000.Applicant
• Wordsworth et al., “MacIntosh Arthroplasty for the Rheumatoid Knee: A 10-year Follow Up,” Ann. Rheum. Dis. 44(11):738-741 (1985).Applicant
• Yusof et al., “Preparation and characterization of chitin beads as a wound dressing precursor”, J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 54(1):59-68, Oct. 2000.Applicant
• Zimmer, Inc., “There's a New Addition to the Flex Family! The Zimmer® Unicompartmental Knee System”, pp. 1-8 (2004).Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Preliminary Examination Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/28679, dated Aug. 5, 2002, 2 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/28679, dated Feb. 27, 2002, 2 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Preliminary Examination Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/28680, dated Jul. 29, 2002, 2 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/28680, dated Feb. 27, 2002, 2 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Preliminary Examination Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/42155, dated Jan. 3, 2003, 2 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/42155, dated Oct. 29, 2002, 2 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US99/30265, dated Aug. 2, 2000, 5 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US03/38158, dated Feb. 23, 2005, 7 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, European Search Report—Application No. EP 03790194, dated Jul. 13, 2006, 7 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US03/32123, dated Mar. 17, 2004, 7 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US04/39616, dated Mar. 28, 2005, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 6 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US04/39714, dated May 13, 2005, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 8 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2005/044008, dated Mar. 30, 2006, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 12 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2006/045172, dated Apr. 19, 2007, 5 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2007/061681, dated Sep. 7, 2007, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 12 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report—Application No. 04812187.5, dated Sep. 27, 2007, 3 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability—International Application No. PCT/US2005/044008, dated Jun. 14, 2007, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 8 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Request for Continued Examination dated May 24, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 21 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 6 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 10 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 6 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 17 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Supplemental Response dated May 2, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 12 pages.Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 10 pages.Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Amendment After Final Rejection dated Aug. 26, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/305,652, 17 pages.Applicant
• International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US02/16945, dated Mar. 26, 2003, 6 pages.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report—Application No. 03713907.8, dated Dec. 6, 2006, 3 page.Applicant
• European Patent Office, Supplementary Partial European Search Report—Application No. 02737254.9, dated Mar. 2, 2007, 5 pages.Applicant
• Adam et al., “NMR tomography of the cartilage structures of the knee joint with 3-D vol. imag combined with a rapid optical-imaging computer,” ROFO Fortschr. Geb. Rontgenstr. Nuklearmed. 150(1): 44-48, 1989.Applicant
• Adam, G. et al., “MR Imaging of the Knee: Three-Dimensional vol. Imaging Combined with Fast Processing” J. Compyt. Asst. Tomogr. Nov.-Dec. 1989 13(6): 984-988, T. 2, V. I.Applicant
• Adams ME, et al., “Quantitative Imaging of Osteoarthritis”, Semin Arthritis Rheum Jun.; 20(6) Suppl. 2: 26-39 (1991) T. 3, V. I.Applicant
• Ahmad CS, et al., “Biomechanical and Topographic Considerations for Autologous Osteochondral Grafting in the Knee”, Am J Sports Med Mar.-Apr.; 29(2): 201-206 (2001) T. 4, V. I.Applicant
• Alexander E.J., “Estimating the motion of bones from markers on the skin (Doctoral Dissertation),” University of Illinois at Chicago (1998).Applicant
• Alexander E.J. and Andriacchi, T.P., “Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems,” Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Meeting, San Diego, CA (1998).Applicant
• Alexander E.J. and Andriacchi, T.P., “Internal to external correspondence in the analysis of lower limb bone motion,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference, Big Sky, Montana (1999).Applicant
• Alexander E.J. and Andriacchi, T.P., “State estimation theory in human movement analysis,” Proceedings of the 1998 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress (1998).Applicant
• Alexander et al., “Optimization techniques for skin deformation,” Correction. International Symposium on 3-D Human Movement Conference, Chattanooga, TN, (1998).Applicant
• Alexander et al., “Dynamic Functional Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System”, ASME Winter International Congress and Exposition, Nashville, TN, 2 Pages(1999) T. 9, V. I.Applicant
• Allen et al., “Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy 5 factors affecting the knee after operations,” J Bone Joint CSurg 66B: 666-671 (1984).Applicant
• Alley et al., “Ultrafast contrast-enhanced three dimensional MR Aagiography: State of the art,” Radiographics 18: 273-285 (1998).Applicant
• Andriacchi, T.P., “Dynamics of knee Malalignment,” Orthop Clin North Am 25: 395-403 (1994).Applicant
• Andriacchi, et al., “A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: Applied to a study of knee kinematics,” J. Biomech Eng 120(12): 743-749 (1998).Applicant
• Andriacchi, et al., “Methods for evaluating the progression of Osterarthiritis”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 37(2): 163-170 (2000).Applicant
• Andriacchi and Strickland, “Gait analysis as a tool to assess joint kinetics biomechanics of normal and pathological human articulating joints,” Nijhoff, Series E 93: 83-102 (1985).Applicant
• Andriacchi and Toney, “In vivo measurement of six-degrees-of-freedom knee movement during functional testing,” Transactions of the Orthopedic Research Society pp. 698 (1995).Applicant
• Aro HT, et al., “Clinical Use of Bone Allografts”, Ann Med 25:403-412, (1993) T. 18, V. I.Applicant
• Atheshian et al., “A B-Spline Least-Squares Surface-Fitting Method for Articular Surfaces of Diarthrodial Joints,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering Division, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 115, pp. 366-373, Nov. 1993.Applicant
• Atheshian et al., “Curvature Characteristics and Congruence of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint-Differences Between Female and Male Joints,” J. Biomechanics, vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 591-607, 1992.Applicant
• Atheshian et al., “Quantitation of Articular Surface Topography and Cartilage Thickenss in Knee Joints Using Stereophotogammetry,” Biomechanics, vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 761-776, 1991.Applicant
• Bashir et al., “Validation of Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of FAF Measurement in Human Cartilage”.Applicant
• Beaulieu et al., “Glenohumeral relationships during physiological shoulder motion and stress testing: Initial experience with open MRI and active Scan-25 plane registration,” Radiology (accepted for publication) (1999).Applicant
• Beaulieu et al., “Dynamic imaging of glenohumeral instability with open MRI,” Int. Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Sydney, Australia (1998).Applicant
• Beckmann N, et al., “Noninvasive 3D MR Microscopy as Tool in Pharmacological Research: Application to a Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis”, Magn Reson Imaging 13 (7): 1013-1017, (1995) T. 22, V. I.Applicant
• Bobic, V., “Arthoroscopic osteochondral autogaft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study,” Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3(4): 262-264 (1996).Applicant
• Boe S., and Hansen H., “Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in patients aged over 50,” J. Bone Joint Surg 68B: 707 (1986).Applicant
• Borgefors, G., Distance Transformations in Digital Images,: Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 34, pp. 344-371, 1986.Applicant
• Borthakur et al., “In Vivo Triple Quantum Filtered Sodium MRI of Human Articular Cartilage” Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 549 (1999).Applicant
• Bregler et al., “Recovering non-rigid 3D shape from image streams,” Proc.IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2000) in press.Applicant
• Bret et al., “Quantitative Analysis of Biomedical Images”, Univ. of Manchester, Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, IBM UK, http://www.wiau.man.ac.uk/˜ads/imv, 12 pages, T. 27, V. I.Applicant
• Brittberg et al., “A critical analysis of cartilage repair,” Acta Orthop Scand 68(2): 186-191 (1997).Applicant
• Brittberg et al., “Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chrondrocyte transplantation,” N Engl J Med 331(14): 889-895 (1994).Applicant
• Broderick et al., “Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs. arthroscopy,” AJR 162: 99-103 (1994).Applicant
• Burgkart R, et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Assessment of Cartilage Loss in Severe Osteoarthritis”, Arth Rheum Sep. 2001; 44(9): 2072-2077, T. 31, V. I.Applicant
• Butterworth et al., Depts of Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, Neurology, & Center for Nuclear Imaging Research, U. of Alabama at Birmingham, USA, 1 Page, T. 32, V. I.Applicant
• Butts et al., “Real-Time MR imaging of joint motion on an open MR imaging scanner,” Radiological Society of North America, 83rd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, (1997).Applicant
• Carano et al., “Estimation of Erosive Changes in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Temporal Multispectral Analysis”, Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 408, (1999) T. 34, V. I.Applicant
• Castriota-Scanderbeg A, et al., “Precision of Sonographic Measurement of Articular Cartilage: Inter-and Intraobserver Analysis”, Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 545-549 T. 35, V. I.Applicant
• Chan et al., “Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Comparison of Radiography, CT and MR Imaging to Asses Extent and Severity”, AJR Am J Roentgenol 157(4): 799-806, (1991).Applicant
• Clarke IC, et al., “Human Hip Joint Geometry and Hemiarthroplasty Selection”, The Hip. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis; (1975), pp. 63-89, T. 37, V. I.Applicant
• Cohen et al., “Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 7: 95-109 (1999).Applicant
• Creamer P, et al., “Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee: A Method of Measuring Response to Intra-Articular Treatments”, Ann Rheum Dis. 1997; 56; 378-381, T. 39, V. I.Applicant
• Daniel et al., “Breast cancer-gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging with a 0.5T open imager and three-point Dixon technique,” Radiology 207(1): 183-190 (1998).Applicant
• Dardzinski et al., “T1-T2 Comparison in Adult Articular Cartilage”, ISMRM Seventh Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, May 22-28, 1999 T. 42, V. II.Applicant
• Dardzinski et al., “Entropy Mapping of Articular Cartilage”, ISMRM Seventh Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, PA (1999) T. 41, V. II.Applicant
• Disler, D.G., “Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage,” AJR 169: 1117-1123 (1997).Applicant
• Disler et al., “Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy,” AJR 167: 127-132 (1996).Applicant
• Disler et al., “Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy,” AJR 165: 377-382 (1995).Applicant
• Doherty M. Hutton C, Bayliss MT, Osteoarthritis. In: Maddison, PJ, Isenberg DA, Woo P, et al., eds. Oxford Textbook of Theumatology, vol. 1. Oxford, New York, Tokyo: Oxford University Press, 959-983 (1993).Applicant
• Dougados et al., “Longitudinal radiologic evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee,” J Theumatol 19 378-394 (1992).Applicant
• Du et al., “Vessel enhancement filtering in three-dimensional MR angiography,” J. Magn Res Imaging 5: 151-157 (1995).Applicant
• Du et al. “Reduction of partial-volume artifacts with zero filled interpolation in three-dimensional MR Angiography,” J Magn Res Imaging 4: 733-741 (1994).Applicant
• Dufour et al., “A Technique for the Dynamical Evaluation of the Acromiohumeral Distance of the Shoulder in the Seated Position under Open-field MRI.” Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 406, 1999. T. 50, V. II.Applicant
• Dumoulin et al., “Real-time position monitoring of invasive devises using magnetic resonance,” Magn Reson Med 29 411-5 (1993).Applicant
• Dupuy DE, et al., “Quantification of Articular Cartilage in the Knee with Three-Dimensional MR Imaging”, Acad Radiol 1996; 3: 919-924 T. 52, V. II.Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging,” AJR 170(3): 593-597 (1998).Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “Determination of Knee Joint Cartilage Thickness Using Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Chondro-Crassometry (3D MR-CCM)”, Magn. Reson. Med. 36(2):256-265, (1996) T. 53, V. II.Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “Effect of Gradient and Section Orientation on Quantitative Analyses of Knee Joint Cartilage”, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 11: 161-167 (2000) T. 54, V. II.Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “Effect of Physical Exercise on Cartilage Volume and Thickness in Vivo: An MR Imaging Study”, Radiology 207: 243-248 (1998) T. 55, V. II.Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “Functional Analysis of Articular Cartilage Deformation, Recovery, and Fluid Flow Following Dynamic Exercise in Vivo”, Anatomy and Embryology 200: 419-424 (1999) T. 56, V. II.Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “New Quantitative Approaches With 3-D MRI: Cartilage Morphology, Function and Degeneration”, Medical Imaging International, Nov.-Dec. 1998 T. 58, V. II.Applicant
• Eckstein et al., “Side Differences of Knee Joint Cartilage Volume, Thickness, and Surface Area, and Correlation With Lower Limb Dominance—An MRI-Based Study”, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 10: 914-921 (2002) T. 59, V. II.Applicant
• Eckstein F, et al., “Accuracy of Cartilage Volume and Thickness Measurements with Magnetic Resonance Imaging”, Clin. Orthop. 1998; 352: 137-148 T. 60, V. II.Applicant
• Eckstein F, et al., “Magnetic Resonance Chondro-Crassometry (MR CCM): A Method for Accurate Determination of Articular Cartilage Thickness?” Magn. Reson. Med. 1996; 35: 89-96 T. 61, V. II.Applicant
• Eckstein F, et al., “The Influence of Geometry on the Stress Distribution in Joints—A Finite Element Analysis”, Anat Embryol, 1994; 189: 545-552 T. 62, V. II.Applicant
• Eckstein F, et al., “The Morphology of Articular Cartilage Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Reproducibility and Anatomical Correlation”, Sur. Radiol Anat 1994; 16: 429-438 T. 63, V. II.Applicant
• Elting and Hubbell, “Unilateral frame distraction: proximal tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthritis,” Contemp Orthrop 27(6): 522-524 (1993).Applicant
• Embrechts et al., “A Parallel Euclidean Distance Transformation Algorithm,” Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 15-26, 1996.Applicant
• Faber et al., “Gender Differences in Knee Joint Cartilage Thickness, Volume and Articular Surface Areas: Assessment With Quantitative Three-Dimensional MR Imaging”, Skeletal radiology 30 (3): 144-150, (2001) T. 65, V. II.Applicant
• Faber et al., “Quantitative Changes of Articular Cartilage Microstructure During Compression of an Intact Joint”, Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 547, (1999) T. 66, V. II.Applicant
• Falcão et al., “User-steered image segmentation paradigms: Live wire and live lane,” Graphical Models and Image Processing 60: 233-260 (1998).Applicant
• Felson et al., “Weight Loss Reduces the risk for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in women: the Framingham study,” Ann Intern Med 116: 535-539 (1992).Applicant
• Gandy et al., “One-Year Longitudinal Study of Femoral Cartilage Lesions in Knee Arthritis”, Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 1032, (1999) T. 69, V. II.Applicant
• Garrett, J.C., “Osteochondral allografts for reconstruction of articular defects of the knee,” Instr Course Lect 47: 517-522 (1998).Applicant
• Gerscovich EO, “A Radiologist's Guide to the Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip” Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26: 447-456 T. 71, V. II.Applicant
• Ghosh et al., “Watershed Segmentation of High Resolution Articular Cartilage Images for Assessment of Osteoarthritis”, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Philadelphia, 1 Page (1999) T. 72, V. II.Applicant
• Glaser et al., “Optimization and Validation of a Rapid Highresolution T1-W 3-D Flash Waterexcitation MR Sequence for the Quantitative Assessment of Articular Cartilage Volume and Thickness” Magnetic Resonance Imaging 19: 177-185 (2001) T. 73, V. II.Applicant
• Goodwin et al., “MR Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Striations in the Radial Layer Reflect the Fibrous Structure of Cartilage”, 1 Page, T. 74, V. II.Applicant
• Gouraud, H., “Continuous shading of curved surfaces,” IEEE Trans on Computers C-20(6) (1971).Applicant
• Graichen et al., “Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Width of the Subacromial Space in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Impingement Syndrome”, American Journal of Roentgenology 172: 1081-1086 (1999) T. 76, V. II.Applicant
• Hall et al., “Quantitative MRI for Clinical Drug Trials of Joint Diseases; Virtual Biopsy of Articular Cartilage”, 1 Page, T. 77, V. II.Applicant
• Hardy et al., “Measuring the Thickness of Articular Cartilage From MR Images”, J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13 (2001) T. 78, V. I.Applicant
• Hardy et al., “The Influence of the Resolution and Contrast on Measuring the Articular Cartilage Volume in Magnetic Resonance Images” Magn Reson Imaging. Oct. 2000; 18(8): 965-972 T. 79, V. II.Applicant
• Hargreaves et al., “MR Imaging of Articular Cartilage Using Driven Equilibrium”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 42(4): 695-703 (Oct. 1999) T. 81, V. III.Applicant
• Hargreaves et al., “Technical considerations for DEFT imaging,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia, Apr. 17-24, 1998.Applicant
• Hargreaves et al., “Imaging of articular cartilage using driven equilibrium,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia, Apr. 17-24, 1998.Applicant
• Haubner M, et al., “A Non-Invasive Technique for 3-Dimensional Assessment of Articular Cartilage Thickness Based on MRI Part @: Validation Using CT Arthrograpphy”, Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15(7): 805-813 T. 83, V. III.Applicant
• Haut et al., “A High Accuracy Three-Dimensional Coordinate Digitizing System for Reconstructing the Geometry of Diarthrodial Joints”, J. Biomechanics 31: 571-577, (1998) T. 84, V. III.Applicant
• Hayes and Conway, “Evaluation of Articular Cartilage: Radiographic and Cross-Sectional Imaging Techniques,” Radiographics 12: 409-428 (1992).Applicant
• Heberhold et al., “An MR-Based Technique for Quantifying the Deformation of Articular Cartilage During Mechanical Loading in an Intact Cadaver Joint”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (1998), 39(5): 843-850 T. 87, V. III.Applicant
• Heberhold et al., “In Situ Measurement of Articular Cartilage Deformation in Intact Femorapatellar Joints Under Static Loading”, Journal of biomechanics 32: 1287-1295 (1999) T. 88, V. III.Applicant
• Henkelman et al., “Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues,” Magn Res Med. 32: 592-601 (1994).Applicant
• Herrmann JM, et al., “High Resolution Imaging of Normal and Osteoarthritic Cartilage with Optical Coherence Tomogrqaphy”, J. Rheumatoil 1999; 26: 627-635 T. 89, V. III.Applicant
• High et al., “Early Macromolecular Collagen Changes in Articular Cartilage of Osteoarthritis (OA): An In Vivo MT-MRI and Histopathologic Study”, 1 Page, T. 90, V. III.Applicant
• Hohe et al., “Surface Size, Curvature Analysis, and Assessment of Knee Joint Incongruity With MR Imaging In Vivo”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 47: 554-561 (2002) T. 91, V. III.Applicant
• Hughes SW, et al., “Technical Note: A Technique for Measuring the Surface Area of Articular Cartilage in Acetabular Fractures”, Br. J. Radiol 1994; 67: 584-588 T. 92, V. III.Applicant
• Husmann O, et al., “Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Proximal Femur”, J. Arthroplasty Jun. 1997; 12(4): 444-450 T. 93, V. III.Applicant
• Hyhlik-Durr et al., “Precision of Tibial Cartilage Morphometry with a coronal water-excitation MR sequence,” European Radiology 10(2): 297-303 (2000).Applicant
• Ihara H., “Double-Contrast CT Arthrography of the Cartilage of the Patellofemoral Joint”, Clin. Orthop. Sep. 1985; 198: 50-55 T. 95, V. III.Applicant
• Iida H, et al., “Socket Location in Total Hip Replacement: Preoperative Computed Tomography and Computer Simulation” Acta Orthop Scand 1988; 59(1): 1-5 T. 96, V. III.Applicant
• Irarrazabal et al., “Fast three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging,” Mag Res. Med. 33: 656-662 (1995).Applicant
• Johnson et al., “The distribution of load across the knee. A comparison of static and dynamic measurements,” J. Bone Joint Surg 62B: 346-349 (1980).Applicant
• Johnson, T.S., “In vivo contact kinematics of the knee joint: Advancing the point cluster technique,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota (1999).Applicant
• Johnson et al., “Development of a knee wear method based on prosthetic in vivo slip velocity,” Transaction of the Orthopedic Research Society, 46th Annual Meeting, Mar. 2000.Applicant
• Jonsson K, et al., “Precision of Hyaline Cartilage Thickness Measurements”, Acta Radiol 1992; 33(3): 234-239 T. 101, V. III.Applicant
• Kaneuji A, et al., “Three Dimensional Morphological Analysis of the Proximal Femoral Canal, Using Computer-Aided Design System, in Japanese Patients with Osteoarthrosis of the Hip”, J. Orthop Sci 2000; 5(4): 361-368 T. 102, V. III.Applicant
• Karvonen RL, et al., “Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Gross Pathology”, Ann Rheum Dis. 1990' 49: 672-675 T. 103, V. III.Applicant
• Kass et al., “Snakes: Active contour models.,” Int J Comput Vision 1: 321-331 (1988).Applicant
• Kauffman et al., “Articular Cartilage Sodium content as a function of compression” Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 1022, 1999 T. 105, V. III.Applicant
• Kiryati, N., “On Length Estimators, Distance Tranformations and Digital Lines in Three Dimensions,” Progress in Image Analysis and Processing III, Proc. of the 7th International Conference in Image Analysis and Processing, Capitolo, Italy, pp. 22-29, 1993.Applicant
• Klosterman et al., “T2 Measurements in Adult Patellar Cartilage at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla”, ISMRM Seventh Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, May 22-28, 1999, T. 106, V. III.Applicant
• Knauss et al., “Self-Diffusion of Water in Cartilage and Cartilage Components as Studied by Pulsed Field Gradient NMR”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 41:285-292 (1999) T. 107, V. III.Applicant
• Koh HL, et al., “Visualization by Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Focal Cartilage Lesions in the Excised Mini-Pig Knee”, J. Orthop. Res. Jul. 1996; 14(4): 554-561 T. 108, V. III.Applicant
• Korhonen et al., “Importance of the Superficial Tissue Layer for the Indentation Stiffness of Articular Cartilage”, Med. Eng. Phys. Mar. 2002; 24(2): 99-108 T. 109, V. III.Applicant
• Korkala O, et al., “Autogenous Osteoperiosteal Grafts in the Reconstruction of Full-Thickness Joint Surface Defects”, Int. Orthop. 1991; 15(3): 233-237 T. 110, V. III.Applicant
• Kshirsagar et al. “Measurement of Localized Cartilage Volume and Thickness of Human Knee Joints by Computer Analysis of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Images”, Invest Radiol. May;33(5): 289-299, 1998 T. 111, V. III.Applicant
• Kwak SD, et al., “Anatomy of Human Patellofemoral Joint Articular Cartilage: Surface Curvature Analysis”, J. Orthop. Res. 1997; 15: 468-472 T. 112, V. III.Applicant
• LaFortune et al., “Three dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking,” J. Biomechanics 25: 347-357 (1992).Applicant
• Lang et al., “Functional joint imaging: a new technique integrating MRI and biomotion studies,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Denver, Apr. 18, 2000-Apr. 24, 2000 (2000).Applicant
• Lang et al., Risk factors for progression of cartilage loss: a longitudinal MRI study. European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, 6th Annual Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland, (1999).Applicant
• Lang et al., Cartilage imaging: comparison of driven equilibrium with gradient-echo, SPAR, and fast spin-echo sequences. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia, Apr. 17-24, (1998).Applicant
• Ledingham et al., “Factors affecting radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis,” Ann Rheum Dis 54: 53-58 (1995).Applicant
• Lefebvre F, et al., “Automatic Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Characterization of Articular Cartilage from High-Resolution Ultrasound Acquisitions”, Ultrasound Med. Biol. Nov. 1998; 24(9): 1369-1381 T. 118, V. III.Applicant
• Li, Hongyi et al., A Boundary Optimization Algorithm for Delineating Brain Objects from CT Scans: Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference 1993 IEEE Conference Record, San Francisco, CA T. 119, V. III.Applicant
• Lin, CJ, et al., “Three-Dimensional Characteristics of Cartilagenous and Bony Components of Dysplastic Hips in Children: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantitative Analysis”, J. Pediatr. Orthop. 1997; 17: 152-157 T. 120, V. III.Applicant
• Lorensen et al., “Marching cubes: a high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm,” Comput Graph 21: 163-169 (1987).Applicant
• Losch et al., “A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI part 1: development of a computational method,” Magn Res Imaging 15(7): 795-804 (1997).Applicant
• Lu et al., “Bone position estimation from skin marker coordinates using globals optimization with joint constraints,” J Biomechanics 32: 129-134 (1999).Applicant
• Lucchetti et al., “Skin movement artifact assessment and compensation in the estimation of knee-joint kinematics,” J Biomechanics 31: 977-984 (1998).Applicant
• Lüsse et al., “Measurement of Distribution of Water Content of Human Articular Cartilage Based on Transverse Relaxation Times: An In Vitro Study”, Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 1020, 1999 T. 125, V. IV.Applicant
• Lynch et al., “Cartilage segmentation of 3D MRI scans of the osteoarthritic knee combining user knowledge and active contours,” Proc. SPIE 3979 Medical Imaging, San Diego, Feb. 2000.Applicant
• Maki et al., “SNR improvement in NMR microscopy using DEFT,” J Mag Res (1988).Applicant
• Marshall KW, et al., “Quantitation of Articular Cartilage Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction”, J. Orthop. Res. 1995; 13: 814-823 T. 128, V. IV.Applicant
• Mattila KT, et al., “Massive Osteoarticular Knee Allografts: Structural Changes Evaluated with CT”, Radiology 1995; 196: 657-660 T. 129, V. IV.Applicant
• Merkle et al., “A Transceiver Coil Assembly for Hetero-Nuclear Investigations of Human Breast at 4T”, Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 170, 1999 T. 130, V. IV.Applicant
• Meyer et al., “Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation,” Magn Res Med 15: 287-304 (1990).Applicant
• Mills et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee: Evaluation of Meniscal Disease”, Curr. Opin. Radiol. 4(6): 77-82 (1992) T. 132, V. IV.Applicant
• Milz S, et al., “The Thickness of the Subchondral Plate and Its Correlation with the thickness of the Uncalcified Articular Cartilage in the Human Patella”, Anat. Embryol. 1995; 192: 437-444 T. 133, V. IV.Applicant
• Minas T., “Chondrocyte Implantation in the Repair of Chondral Lesions of the Knee: Economics and Quality of Life”, Am. J. Orthop. Nov. 1998; 27: 739-744 T. 134.Applicant
• Modest et al., “Optical Verification of a Technique for In Situ Ultrasonic Measurement of Articular Cartilage Thickness”, J. Biomechanics 22(2): 171-176, 1989 T. 135, V. IV.Applicant
• Mollica et al., “Surgical treatment of arthritic varus knee by tibial corticotomy and angular distraction with an external fixator,” Ital J Orthrop Traumatol 18(1): 17-23 (1992).Applicant
• Moussa M., “Rotational Malalignment and Femoral Torsion in Osteoarthritic Knees with Patellofemoral Joint Imvolvement: A CT Scan Study”, Clin. Orthop. Jul. 1994; 304: 176-183 T. 137, V. IV.Applicant
• Mundinger et al., “Magnetic Resonance Tomography in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Joints”, Schweiz Med. Wochenschr. 121(15): 517-527, 1991 T. 138, V. IV.Applicant
• Myers SL, et al., “Experimental Assessment by High Frequency Ultrasound of Articular Cartilage Thickness and Osteoarthritic Changes”, J. Rheumatol 1995; 22: 109-116 T. 139, V. IV.Applicant
• Nieminen et al., “T2 Indicates Incompletely the Biomechanical Status of Enzymatically Degraded Articular Cartilage of 9.4T”, Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 551, 1999 T. 140, V. IV.Applicant
• Nishii et al., “Three Dimensional Evaluation of the Acetabular and Femoral Articular Cartilage in the Osteoarthritis of the Hip Joint”, Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 1030, 1999 T. 141, V. IV.Applicant
• Nizard, R.S., “Role of tibial osteotomy in the treatment of medical femorotibial osteoarthritis,” Rev Rhum Engl Ed 65(7-9): 443-446 (1998).Applicant
• Noll et al.,“Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging,” IEEE Trans Med Imag 10(2): 154-163 (1991).Applicant
• Ogilvie-Harris et al., “Arthroscopic management of the degenerative knee,” Arthroscopy 7: 151-157 (1991).Applicant
• Parkkinen et al., “A Mechanical Apparatus With Microprocessor Controlled Stress Profile for Cyclic Compression of Cultured Articular Cartilage Explants”, J. Biomech. 1989; 22 (11-12): 1285-1290 T. 145, V. IV.Applicant
• Pearle et al., “Use of an external MR-tracking coil for active scan plane registration during dynamic Musculoskeletal MR imaging in a vertically open MR unit,” American Roentgen Ray Society, San Francisco, CA, (1998).Applicant
• Peterfy et al., “Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the carpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging,” AJR 165: 371-375 (1995).Applicant
• Peterfy et al., “MR Imaging of the arthritic knee: improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed TI-weighted sequences,” Radiology 191(2): 413-419 (1994).Applicant
• Peterfy et al., “Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation,” Radiology 192(2): 485-491 (1994).Applicant
• Peterfy CG, et al., “Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Articular Cartilage”, Radiol Clin North Am. Mar. 1996; 34(2): 195-213 T. 147, V. IV.Applicant
• Pilch et al. “Assessment of Cartilage Volume in the Femorotibial Joint With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 3D Computer Reconstruction”, J. Rheumatol. 21(12): 2307-2319, 1994 T. 151, V. IV.Applicant
• Piplani et al., “Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images,” Radiology 198: 855-859 (1996).Applicant
• Potter et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee: an evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging,” J Bone Joint Surg 80-A(9): 1276-1284 (1998).Applicant
• Potter et al., “Sensitivity of Quantitative NMR Imaging to Matrix Composition in Engineered Cartilage Tissue” Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 552, 1999, T. 154, V. IV.Applicant
• Probst et al., “Technique for Measuring the Area of Canine Articular Surfaces”, Am. J. Vet. Res. 48(4): 608-609, 1987 T. 155, V. IV.Applicant
• Prodromos et al., “A relationship between gait and clinical changes following high tibial osteotomy,” J Bone Joint Surg 67A: 1188-1194 (1985).Applicant
• Radin et al., “Mechanical Determination of Osteoarthrosis,” Sem Artht Rheum 21(3): 12-21 (1991).Applicant
• Radin et al., Characteristics of Joint Loading as it Applies to Osteoarthrosis in: Mow VC, Woo S.Y., Ratcliffe T., eds. Symposium on Biomechanics of Diathrodial Joints, vol. 2, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag 437-451 (1990).Applicant
• Ragnemalm, I., “The Euclidean Distance Transform in Arbitrary Dimensions,” Pattern Recognition Letters, North-Holland, vol. 14, No. 11, pp. 883-888, Nov. 1993.Applicant
• Recht et al., “Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging int eh detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities,” Radiology 198: 209-212 (1996).Applicant
• Recht et al., “MR imaging of articular cartilage: current status and future directions,” AJR 163: 283-290 (1994).Applicant
• Reiser et al., “Magnetic Resonance in Cartilaginous Lesions of the Knee Joint With Three-Dimensional Gradient-Echo Imaging”, Skeletal Radiol. 17(7): 465-471, 1988, T. 161, V. V.Applicant
• Ritter et al. “Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement,” Clin Orthop 299: 153-156 (1994).Applicant
• Robarts Research Institute, Abstract #1028, T. 163, V. V.Applicant
• Robson et al., “A Combined Analysis and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technique for Computerized Automatic Measurement of Cartilage Thickness in Distal Interphalangeal Joint”, Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13(5): 709-718 (1995) T. 164, V. V.Applicant
• Rushfeldt PD, et al. “Improved Techniques for Measuring In Vitro the Geometry and Pressure Distribution in the Human Acetabulum—1. Ultrasonic Measurement of Acetabular Surfaces, Sphericity and Cartilage Thickness”, J. Biomech 1981; 14(4): 253-260 T. 165, V. V.Applicant
• Saied A, et al., “Assessment of Articular Cartilage and Subchondral Bone: Subtle and Progressive Changes in Experimental Osteoarthritis Using 50 MHz Echography In Vitro”, J. Bone Miner Res. 1997; 12(9): 1378-1386 T. 166, V. V.Applicant
• Saito et al., “New algorithms for Euclidean distance transformation of an—dimensional digitized picture with applications,” Pattern Recognition 27(11): 1551-1565 (1994).Applicant
• Schipplein and Andriacchi, “Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking,” J Orthop Res 9: 113-119 (1991).Applicant
• Schouten et al., “A 12 year follow up study in the general population on prognostic factors of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis of the knee,” Ann Rheum Dis 51: 932-937 (1992).Applicant
• Shapiro et al. “In-Vivo Evaluation of Human Cartilage Compression and Recovery using 1H and 23Na MRI”, Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 548, 1999 T. 170, V. V.Applicant
• Sharif et al., “Serum hyaluronic acid level as a predictor of disease progression in osteoarthritis of the knee,” Arthritis Rheum 38: 760-767 (1995).Applicant
• Sharma et al., “Knee adduction moment, serum hyaluronic acid level, and disease severity in medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism 41(7): 1233-40 (1998).Applicant
• Shoup et al., “The driven equilibrium Fourier transform NMR technique: an experimental study,” J Mag Res p. 8 (1972).Applicant
• Sittek H, et al., “Assessment of Normal Patellar Cartilage Volume and Thickness Using MRI: an Analysis of Currently Available Pulse Sequences”, Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 55-61, T. 174, V. V.Applicant
• Slemenda et al., “Lower extremity lean tissue mass strength predict increases in pain and in functional impairment in knee osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Rheum 39(suppl): S212 (1996).Applicant
• Slemenda et al., “Lower extremity strength, lean tissue mass and bone density in progression of knee osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Rheum 39(suppl): S169 (1996).Applicant
• Solloway et al., “The use of active shape models for making thickness measurements of articular cartilage from MR images,” Mag Res Med 37: 943-952 (1997).Applicant
• Soslowsky LJ, et al., “Articular Geometry of the Glenohumeral Joint”, Clin. Orthop. Dec. 1992; 285: 181-190 T. 178, V. V.Applicant
• Spoor and Veldpas, “Rigid body motion calculated from spatial coordinates of markers,” J. Biomechanics 13: 391-393 (1980).Applicant
• Stammberger et al., “A Method for Quantifying Time Dependent Changes in MR Signal Intensity of Articular Cartilage As a Function of Tissue Deformation in Intact Joints” Medical Engineering & Physics 20: 741-749, 1998 T. 180, V. V.Applicant
• Stammberger et al., “A New Method for 3D Cartilage Thickness Measurement with MRI, Based on Euclidean Distance Transformation, and its Reproducibility in the Living”, Sixth Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 562, 1998 T. 181, V. V.Applicant
• Stammberger et al., “Elastic Registration of 3D Cartilage Surfaces From MR Image Data for Detecting Local Changes of the Cartilage Thickness”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 44: 592-601 (2000) T. 183, V. V.Applicant
• Stammberger et al., “Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: computational method and reproducibility in the living,” Mag Res Med 41: 529-536 (1999).Applicant
• Stammberger et al., “Interobserver to reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: Comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation,” Mag Res Imaging 17: 1033-1042 (1999).Applicant
• Steines, D., et al., Segmentation of osteoarthritic femoral cartilage using live wire, ISMRM Eight Scientific Meeting, Denver, Colorado, 2000.Applicant
• Steines et al., “Segmentation of osteoarthritis femoral cartilage from MR images,” CARS—Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery, pp. 578-583, San Francisco (2000).Applicant
• Steines et al., Measuring volume of articular cartilage defects in osteoarthritis using MRI. To be presented at ACR 64th Annual Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, Oct. 2000.Applicant
• Stevenson et al., “The fate of articular cartilage after transplantation of fresh and cryopreserved tissue-antigen-matched and mismatched osteochondral allografts in dogs,” J. Bone Joint Surg 71(9): 1297-1307 (1989).Applicant
• Tebben et al., “Three-Dimensional Computerized Reconstruction. Illustration of Incremental Articula Cartilage Thinning”, Invest. Radiol. 32(8): 475-484, 1997 T. 189, V. V.Applicant
• Tieschky et al., “Repeatability of patellar cartilage thickness patterns in the living, using a fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging sequence with short acquisition time and three-dimensional data processing,” J. Orthop Res 15(6): 808-813 (1997).Applicant
• Tomasi and Kanade, “Shape and motion from image streams under orthography—a factorization method,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 90(21): 9795-9802 (1993).Applicant
• Tsai et al., “Application of a flexible loop-gap resonator for MR imaging of articular cartilage at 3.TO,” International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Denver, Apr. 18, 2000-Apr. 24, 2000 (2000).Applicant
• Tyler JA, et al., “Detection and Monitoring of Progressive Degeneration of Osteoarthritic Cartilage by MRI”, Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 Suppl. 266: 130-138 T. 193, V. V.Applicant
• Van Leersum MD, et al., “Thickness of Patellofemoral Articular Cartilage as Measured on MR Imaging: Sequence Comparison of accuracy, reproducibility, and interobserver variation”, Skeletal Radiol 1995; 24: 431-435 T. 194, V. V.Applicant
• Vandeberg et al., “Assessment of Knee Cartilage in Cadavers With Dual-Detector Spiral CT Arthrography and MR Imaging”, Radiology, Feb. 2002: 222(2): 430-435 T.195, V.V.Applicant
• VanderLinden et al., “MR Imaging of Hyaline Cartilage at 0.5 T: A Quantitative and Qualitative in vitro Evaluation of Three Types of Sequences”, Jun. 1998 T. 196, V. V.Applicant
• Velyvis et al., “Evaluation of Articular Cartilage with Delayed Gd(DTPA)2-Enhanced MRI: Promise and Pitfalls”, Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 554, 1999 T. 197, V. V.Applicant
• Wang et al., “The influence of walking mechanics and time on the results of proximal tibial osteotomy,” J. Bone Joint Surg 72A: 905-909 (1990).Applicant
• Warfield et al., “Automatic Segmentation of MRI of the Knee”, ISMRM Sixth Scientific Meeting and Exhibition p. 563, Apr. 18-24, 1998, Sydney, Australia T. 199, V. V.Applicant
• Warfield et al., “Adaptive Template Moderated Spatially Varying Statistical Classification”, Proc. First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted, MICCAI 1998, pp. 231-238 T. 200, V. V.Applicant
• Warfield et al., “Adaptive, Template Moderated Spatially Varying Statistical Classification”, Medical Image Analysis 4(1): 43-55, 2000 T. 201, V. V.Applicant
• Waterton et al., “Diurnal variation in the femoral articular cartilage of the knee in young adult humans,” Mag REs Med 43: 126-132 (2000).Applicant
• Waterton JC, et al., “Magnetic Resonance Methods for Measurement of Disease Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis”, Magn. Reson. Imaging 1993; 11: 1033-1038 T. 203, V. VI.Applicant
• Watson PJ, et al., “MR Protocols for Imaging the Guinea Pig Knee”, Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15(8): 957-970 T. 204, V. VI.Applicant
• Wayne et al., “Measurement of Articular Cartilage Thickness in the Articulated Knee”, ANN Biomed Eng. Jan.-Feb. 1998; 26(1): 96-102 T.205, V. VI.Applicant
• Wayne JS, et al., “Finite Element Analyses of Repaired Articular Surfaces”, Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng. 1991; 205(3): 155-162 T. 206, V. VI.Applicant
• Woolf et al., “Magnetization transfer contrast: MR imaging of the knee,” Radiology 179: 623-628 (1991).Applicant
• Worring et al., “Digital curvature estimation. CVGIP,” Image Understanding 58(3): p. 366-382 (1993).Applicant
• Yan, C.H., “Measuring changes in local volumetric bone density,” new approaches to quantitative computed tomography, Ph.D. thesis, 1998, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University.Applicant
• Yao et al., “Incidental magnetization transfer contrast in fast spin-echo imaging of cartilage,” J. Magn Reson Imaging 6(1): 180-184 (1996).Applicant
• Yao et al., “MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5T,” AJR 158(2): 339-345 (1992).Applicant
• Yasuda et al., “A 10 to 15 year follow up observation of high tibial osteotomy in medial compartment osteoarthritis,” Clin Orthop 282: 186-195 (1992).Applicant
• Brandt et al., “CRIGOS—Entwicklung eines Kompaktrobotersystems für die bildgeführte orthopädische Chirurgie”, Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 645-649 (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• Brandt et al. [English Translation], “CRIGOS—Development of a Compact Robot System for Image-Guided Orthopedic Surgery,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 645-649 (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• CAOS, “MIS meets CAOS Spring 2005 Symposium Schedule,” CAOS Spring 2005 Symposium, 9 pages (May 2005).Applicant
• Chelule et al., “Patient-Specific Template to Preserve Bone Stock in Total Knee Replacement: Preliminary Results,” 15th Annual ISTA Symposium, 1 page (Sep. 2002).Applicant
• Hafez et al. “Computer Assisted Total Knee Replacement: Could a Two-Piece Custom Template Replace the Complex Conventional Instrumentations?”, Session 6: Novel Instruments; Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 93-94 (Jun. 2004).Applicant
• Hafez et al., “Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Patient-specific Templating”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 444, pp. 184-192 (Mar. 2006).Applicant
• Radermacher et al., “Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery by Means of Individual Templates•Aspects and Analysis of Potential Applications” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 1: Sessions I-III, MRCAS '94, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 42-48 (Sep. 22-24, 1994).Applicant
• Schiffers et al. “Planung und Ausführung von orthopädischen Operationen mit Hilfe von Individualschablonen”, Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 636-640, (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• Schiffers et al. [English Translation], “Planning and execution of orthopedic surgery using individualized templates,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 636-640 (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• Thoma et al. “Einsatz eines neuen 3D-computertomographischen Subtraktionsverfahrens zur individuellen Versorgung von Knochendefekten an Hüften und Knie”, Journal DGPW, No. 17, pp. 27-28 (May 1999).Applicant
• Thoma et al. [English Translation],“Use of a New Subtraction Procedure Based on Three-Dimensional CT Scans for the Individual Treatment of Bone Defects in the Hip and Knee,” Journal DGPW, No. 17, pp. 27-28 (May 1999).Applicant
• Thoma et al., “Endoprothetischen Versorgung des Kniegelenks auf der Basis eines 3D-computertomographischen Subtraktionsverfahrens”, Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 641-644, (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• Thoma et al., [English Translation], “Custom-made knee endoprosthetics using subtraction data of three-dimensional CT scans—A new approach,” Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 641-644, (Jul. 2000).Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, dated Jul. 9, 2002—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224 (6 pages).Applicant
• Robins & Pasternak LLP Menlo Park, CA, Amendment to Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224, filed Dec. 23, 2002 (18 pages).Applicant
• Cooley Godward LLP Palo Alto, CA, Amendment Accompanying RCE and IDS—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224, filed Jun. 24, 2003 (50 pages).Applicant
• Robins & Pasternak LLP Palo Alto, CA, Supplemental Amendment—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224, filed Jan. 13, 2004 (37 pages).Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, dated Feb. 4, 2004—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224 (6 pages).Applicant
• Robins & Pasternak LLP Palo Alto, CA, Response to Office Action (Election of Species Requirement)—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224, filed Feb. 18, 2004 (4 pages).Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, dated Dec. 10, 2004—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224 (7 pages).Applicant
• Kenyon & Kenyon San Jose, CA, Amendment to Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224, filed Apr. 11, 2005 (71 pages).Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, dated Jun. 28, 2005—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224 (7 pages).Applicant
• Kenyon & Kenyon San Jose, CA, RCE with Amendment to Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224, filed Sep. 15, 2005 (67 pages).Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, dated Dec. 13, 2005—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224 (8 pages).Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP Boston, MA, Amendment to Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224, filed Jun. 12, 2006 (71 pages).Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP Boston, MA, Supplemental Amendment—U.S. Appl. No. 09/662,224, filed Aug. 4, 2006 (49 pages).Applicant
• United Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, dated Nov. 30, 2005—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (6 pages).Applicant
• Kenyon & Kenyon LLP, Response to Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, dated Mar. 7, 2006 (3 pages).Applicant
• United Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, dated Aug. 1, 2006—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (5 pages).Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, filed Jan. 3, 2007 (5 pages).Applicant
• United Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, dated Sep. 6, 2007—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (13 pages).Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Amendment—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, filed Mar. 6, 2008 (20 pages).Applicant
• United Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2008—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (17 pages).Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Request for Continued Examination Along with Amendment—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, filed Oct. 10, 2008 (38 pages).Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Supplemental Response to Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, filed Oct. 16, 2008 (24 pages).Applicant
• United Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, dated Jan. 9, 2009—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (11 pages).Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, filed Jul. 9, 2009 (23 pages).Applicant
• United Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, dated Oct. 23, 2009—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (13 pages).Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Request for Continued Examination Along with Response—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, filed Apr. 23, 2010 (27 pages).Applicant
• United Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, dated May 17, 2010—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010 (12 pages).Applicant
• Sunstein, Kann, Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment to Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 10/764,010, filed Nov. 17, 2010 (17 pages).Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Preliminary Amendment—U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515 (9 pages), as filed Aug. 22, 2006.Applicant
• United Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2008—U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515 (33 pages).Applicant
• Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Amendment to Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, filed Jun. 30, 2009 (16 pages).Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Supplemental Amendment—U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, filed Aug. 26, 2009 (11 pages).Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Supplemental Amendment—U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, filed Sep. 21, 2009 (11 pages).Applicant
• United Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2009—U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515 (38 pages).Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment to Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, filed Jun. 28, 2010 (16 pages).Applicant
• United Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2010—U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515 (20 pages).Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Amendment to Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, filed Apr. 6, 2011 (12 pages).Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers, LLP, Preliminary Amendment—U.S. Appl. No. 11/739,326, filed Jul. 31, 2009 (22 pages).Applicant
• United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2010—U.S. Appl. No. 11/739,326 (35 pages).Applicant
• Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers, LLP, Amendment to Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 11/739,326, filed Oct. 20, 2010 (29 pages).Applicant