US 6,294,896 B1Grant

Method and apparatus for measuring complex self-immitance of a general electrical element

Issue Date:2001-09-25

•100 Claims

•4 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

A device measures complex self-immittance of a general element at a discrete frequency by implementing “sine/cosine correlation” in software. An active source excites the element with a periodic voltage or current having fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of the desired measurement frequency. Linear circuitry senses two signals; one proportional to the periodic voltage or current excitation, the other proportional to the periodic current or voltage response. Identical low-pass or band-pass filter-response functions process each signal to remove higher-order harmonics. The resulting band-limited signals are each sampled in synchronism with the excitation, digitized, and inputted to a microprocessor or microcontroller which performs the appropriate calculations.

Metadata

Inventor

Keith S. Champlin

Application Information

Application Number:US 09/710,031

Filing Date:2000-11-10

Priority Date:1998-09-11

Art Unit:7

Classifications

IPC:

H01J 700G01N 2746

Field of Search:

320134320DIG 12324430324426

Patent Drawings (4 sheets)

Description

[0002] This application is a Continuation-In-Part of application Ser. No. 09/503,015, filed Feb. 11, 2000 which is a Continuation-In-Part of application Ser. No. 09/454,629, filed Dec. 3, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,172,483 which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 09/152,219, filed Sep. 11, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,238.

Background of the Invention

[0003] Self-immittance refers to either impedance, or its reciprocal, admittance, measured between a single pair of terminals. At a given discrete frequency, self-immittance is a complex quantity. As such, it contains two components and can be expressed as either magnitude and phase, or real and imaginary parts. These two alternative forms of complex self-impedance/admittance are equivalent.

[0004] Patents have recently been applied for by Champlin which are directed to a technique for measuring complex self-immittance of electrochemical cells and batteries (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,238, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/454,629, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/503,015). Special provisions of that technique take into account the very low impedance level and the intrinsic internal voltage of a cell or battery. One aspect of the present invention includes measuring complex self-impedance/admittance of a general two-terminal electrical element having arbitrary impedance and that may, or may not, contain an internal voltage source.

[0005] Balanced bridge methods for measuring complex self-immittance at a discrete frequency are well known. Two examples are shown in FIGS. 1aand 1b. FIG. 1aillustrates a bridge circuit for directly measuring real and imaginary parts of the complex self-impedance, Z=R+jX, of a general element denoted GE, where j={square root over (−1+L )}. FIG. 1billustrates a bridge for directly measuring a general element's real and imaginary parts of self-admittance, Y=G+jB. Although complex Z and Y are related by the reciprocal relationship Y=1/Z, the same is not true of their real and imaginary components (G≠1/R, B≠1/X). Hence, the distinctly different bridge circuits.

[0006] Consider either FIG. 1aor FIG. 1b. At a given frequency of the sinusoidal generator, one adjusts the calibrated variable resistance or conductance element, R_Xor G_X, and the calibrated variable reactance or susceptance element, X_Xor B_X, for bridge balance as indicated by the null detector. By virtue of the equal resistors R_Bon either side of the bridge, the balance condition indicates that R_X=R and X_X=X (FIG. 1a) or G_X=G and B_X=B (FIG. 1b). Accordingly, the real and imaginary parts of the unknown self-immittance, either Z=R+jX or Y=G+jB, an be read directly from the calibrated values of the appropriate two variable elements.

[0007] Bridge methods for measuring complex self-immittance suffer from several disadvantages. First of all, obtaining an accurate balance condition is a very time-consuming procedure that generally requires exceptional skill. Secondly, bridge accuracy is critically dependent upon the calibration accuracy of the variable elements. Finally, calibrated reactance and susceptance elements that are variable over a wide adjustment range are very difficult to implement.

[0008] A second prior-art technique for measuring complex self-immittance of a general element at a particular discrete frequency is illustrated in FIG. 2. In this circuit, a sinusoidal current i(t) excites the unknown element. This excitation current is sensed across a “viewing” resistor, which, for simplicity, is assumed to be 1 ohm. Accordingly, in this example, the sensed current-signal voltage across the resistor is numerically equal to i(t). This excitation current signal is presented to the horizontal input of an oscilloscope, and the responding voltage signal across the general element, v(t), is presented to the vertical input. The resulting display is known as a single-loop Lissajous' pattern.

[0009] If, for simplicity, the horizontal and vertical gains are chosen to be equal, one can determine the magnitude and phase of the unknown self-impedance directly from the displayed Lissajous' pattern. The magnitude is simply the ratio of maximum vertical excursion to maximum horizontal excursion, and the phase angle is the inverse sine of the ratio of zero-crossing point to maximum excursion. Although this Lissajous' pattern technique is very simple, it is not particularly accurate since it depends critically upon the operator's visual acuity.

[0010] A third prior-art method for measuring discrete-frequency complex self-admittance of a general element—a method that is closely related to the present invention—is illustrated in FIG. 3. This technique utilizes apparatus, often referred to as a “frequency response analyzer” (FRA), implementing a measuring technique known as “sine/cosine correlation”.

[0011] Consider FIG. 3. A sinusoidal generator generates zero-phase reference voltage v(t)=V sin(ωt). Because of the feedback-induced “virtual short-circuit” at the input of the operational amplifier, reference voltage v(t) appears directly across the unknown GE, and thus serves as its excitation. The responding current through the GE can be written in the form i(t)=I⁰sin(ωt)+I⁹⁰cos(ωt) where I⁰is the amplitude of the current component that is in time-phase with the reference voltage, and I⁹⁰is the amplitude of the component in time-quadrature. Assuming for simplicity that the feedback resistor is 1 ohm, the voltage signal at the output of the operational amplifier is numerically equal to −i(t). Thus, the operational amplifier serves as a current-to-voltage converter.

[0012] The two signals, v(t) and −i(t), are multiplied together in a first hardware multiplier. The multiplier's output is the product −VI⁰sin²(ωt)−VI⁹⁰sin(ωt)cos(ωt), which, by using well-known trigonometric identities, can be written −(VI⁰/2)+(VI⁰/2)cos(2ωt)−(VI⁹⁰/2)sin(2ωt). Integrating this signal with a first hardware integrator (low-pass filter) removes the two time-varying components leaving only the dc voltage −(VI⁰/2).

[0013] The two signals at the inputs of the second multiplier are −i(t) and a signal V cos(ωt) obtained by shifting v(t) in time-phase by 90°. Again by using well-known trigonometric identities, the multiplier's output can be shown to be −(VI/2)sin(2ωt)−(VI⁹⁰/2)−(VI⁹⁰/2)cos(2ωt). Integrating this signal with a second hardware integrator removes the two time-varying components leaving only the dc voltage −(VI⁹⁰/2).

[0014] Both inputs of the third multiplier are v(t)=V sin(ωt). The output signal is therefore V²sin²(ωt) which, by using a trigonometric identity, can be shown to be equivalent to (V²/2)−(V²/2)cos(2ωt). Integrating this signal with a third hardware integrator removes the time-varying component leaving only the dc voltage (V²/2).

[0015] Finally, the dc outputs of the first and second integrators are divided by the dc output of the third integrator. These two divisions yield −G=(−I⁰/V) and −B=(−I⁹⁰/V), respectively, the negative real and imaginary parts of admittance Y=G+jB of the unknown element. Thus, by employing a zero-phase reference voltage as excitation and sensing the resulting in-phase and quadrature components of current response, the apparatus of FIG. 3 fundamentally measures components of complex self-admittance. One sees further that this technique employs hardware devices to evaluate the two correlation integrals ∫i(t)sin(ωt)dt and ∫i(t)cos(ωt)dt. Hence the name “sine/cosine correlation”.

[0016] Improvements and variations on this basic “sine/cosine correlation” technique have been described by Jackson in U.S. Pat. No. 3,808,526; by Allison in U.S. Pat. No. 4,322,806; by Sugihara in U.S. Pat. No. 4,409,543; by Ryder in U.S. Pat. No. 4,868,487; by Wakasugi, et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,888,701; by Kitayoshi in U.S. Pat. No. 4,947,130; by Wakasugi in U.S. Pat. No. 4,935,692; and by Park in U.S. Pat. No. 5,519,325.

Summary of the Invention

[0017] The present invention eliminates the hardware multipliers, integrators, and phase shifter of the above “sine/cosine correlation” technique. Complex self-immittance of a general electrical element is measured at a discrete frequency by implementing “sine/cosine correlation” in software. This mathematical determination is exact when the measurement signals are appropriately band limited.

[0018] An active time-varying source excites the unknown element with a periodic voltage or periodic current having fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of the desired measurement frequency. Linear circuitry senses two time-varying signals; one proportional to the periodic voltage or current excitation; the other proportional to the periodic current or voltage response. Identical low-pass or band-pass filter-response functions process each signal to remove higher-order harmonics. The resulting band-limited signals are each sampled in synchronism with the excitation; samples being acquired at three or more equally spaced times over a period of the excitation and over one or more consecutive periods. Digital representations of the sampled signals are inputted to a microprocessor or microcontroller, averaged or summed over consecutive periods, multiplied by appropriate sine/cosine values, and summed numerically to evaluate “sine/cosine correlation” integrals. The microprocessor/controller combines the numerically computed integrals mathematically to evaluate the components of complex self-immittance of the general element.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0019] FIG. 1ais a simplified representation of a bridge circuit used to determine real and imaginary parts of complex self-impedance of a general element at a discrete frequency.

[0020] FIG. 1bis a simplified representation of a bridge circuit used to determine real and imaginary parts of complex self-admittance of a general element at a discrete frequency.

[0021] FIG. 2 is a simplified representation of apparatus used to determine magnitude and phase of complex self-impedance by the Lissajous' pattern method.

[0022] FIG. 3 is a simplified representation of Frequency Response Analyzer (FRA) apparatus used to measure real and imaginary parts of the complex self-admittance of a general element by sine/cosine correlation.

[0023] FIG. 4 is a block-diagram of a first embodiment of apparatus for measuring complex self-immittance of a general element at a discrete measuring frequency in accordance with the present invention.

[0024] FIG. 5 is a simplified representation of a possible periodic voltage source for use with the apparatus of FIGS. 4, 8 and 9.

[0025] FIG. 6 is a block-diagram of a second embodiment of apparatus for measuring complex self-immittance of a general element at a discrete measuring frequency in accordance with the present invention.

[0026] FIG. 7 is a simplified representation of a possible periodic voltage source for use with the apparatus of FIG. 6.

[0027] FIG. 8 is a block-diagram of a third embodiment of apparatus for measuring complex self-immittance of a general element at a discrete measuring frequency in accordance with the present invention.

[0028] FIG. 9 is a block-diagram of a fourth embodiment of apparatus that is particularly appropriate for measuring complex self-immittance of a low-impedance element at a discrete measuring frequency in accordance with the present invention.

[0029] FIG. 10 depicts one method of modifying an active element, such as an electrochemical cell or battery, in order to approximate its self-immittance with the apparatus of FIG. 4, 6, 8, or 9.

[0030] FIG. 11 depicts another method of modifying an active element, such as an electrochemical cell or battery, in order to approximate its self-immittance with the apparatus of FIG. 4, 6, 8, or 9.

[0031] FIG. 12 is a linear-frequency plot of normalized Fourier coefficient magnitude in dB calculated from sampled sinusoidal data acquired at the rate of 5 samples per synchronous period and averaged or summed over 64 synchronous periods.

[0032] FIG. 13 is a linear-frequency plot of normalized Fourier coefficient magnitude in dB calculated from sampled sinusoidal data acquired at the rate of 5 samples per synchronous period and averaged or summed over 256 synchronous periods.

[0033] FIG. 14 is a linear-frequency plot of normalized Fourier coefficient magnitude in dB calculated from sampled sinusoidal data acquired at the rate of 10 samples per synchronous period and averaged or summed over 64 synchronous periods.

[0034] FIG. 15 is a linear-frequency plot of normalized Fourier coefficient magnitude in dB calculated from sampled sinusoidal data acquired at the rate of 10 samples per synchronous period and averaged or summed over 256 synchronous periods.

[0035] FIG. 16 is a logarithmic-frequency plot of normalized Fourier coefficient magnitude in dB calculated from sampled sinusoidal data acquired at the rate of 5 samples per synchronous period and averaged or summed over 256 synchronous periods.

[0036] FIG. 17 is a logarithmic-frequency plot of normalized Fourier coefficient magnitude in dB calculated from sampled sinusoidal data acquired at the rate of 10 samples per synchronous period and averaged or summed over 256 synchronous periods.

Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments

[0037] FIG. 4 discloses a block-diagram of a first embodiment of apparatus for measuring complex self-immittance of a general element (GE) 5, at a discrete measuring frequency in accordance with the present invention. An active time-varying voltage source 10 generates a periodic voltage v(t) having fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of the desired measuring frequency. Periodic voltage v(t) may comprise a sinusoid, a square wave, a triangle wave, or any other periodic waveform. The timing of periodic voltage v(t) is controlled by microprocessor/controller 15 via synchronization path 20. Because of the feedback-induced “virtual short-circuit” at the input of operational amplifier 25, voltage v(t) appears directly across the unknown general element 5 and thus serves as its excitation. Assuming for simplicity that feedback resistor 30 is 1 ohm, the response of GE 5, current i(t), is numerically equal to the negative of the voltage signal at the output 35 of operational amplifier 25 −i(t). Thus, operational amplifier 25 serves as a current-to-voltage converter to detect the response.

[0038] Under control of microprocessor/controller 15 via control path 45, multiplexer 50 selects either −i(t) signal 35 or v(t) signal 40 for presentation to the input of band-limiting filter 55. The response function F(ω) of filter 55 may comprise either a low-pass response function or a band-pass response function. In addition, filter 55 may comprise either conventional fixed-tuned circuitry or switched-capacitor circuitry having cutoff- or center-frequency under program control via filter clock path 60. The primary function of band-limiting filter 55 is to eliminate higher-order harmonics that cause frequency “aliasing” errors. It also serves to attenuate noise. Note that both v(t) and −i(t) signals are processed by the same filter response function F(ω) to yield band-limited signals v′(t) and −i′(t). Accordingly, both the attenuation and the phase-shift of F(ω) cancel out of the subsequent determination of complex self-immittance of element 5.

[0039] Analog to digital converter 65 accepts band-limited signals v′(t) and −i′(t) as inputs. Microprocessor/controller 15 strobes these data in synchronism with the waveform of source 10 via control path 70. The resulting digital samples of v′(t) and −i′(t)—acquired at three or more equally spaced times over an excitation period and over one or more consecutive excitation periods—are inputted to microprocessor/controller 15 via data path 75. Using mathematical techniques that are fully disclosed below, microprocessor/controller 15 calculates components of complex self-immittance 80 of GE 5 from these synchronously acquired digital data samples.

[0040] Since the apparatus of FIG. 4, like that of FIG. 3, employs voltage excitation and current response, it may be considered means for measuring components of complex self-admittance Y=G+jB. However, as will be explained fully below, the excitation signal will not be assumed a zero-phase reference. Accordingly, excitation and response are mathematically symmetrical, and the apparatus of FIG. 4 can just as well be considered means for determining complex self-impedance.

[0041] FIG. 5 discloses a very simple active periodic voltage source 10 appropriate to the apparatus of FIG. 4, as well as to apparatus disclosed below in FIGS. 8 and 9. A source of constant voltage V₀85 is placed in series with a controlled switch 90 that may comprise a MOSFET or bipolar transistor operating in its switch mode. Microprocessor/controller 15 commands controlled switch 90 to periodically turn “on” and “off” via command path 20. Accordingly, voltage v(t) comprises a square-wave signal having peak-to-peak amplitude V₀along with dc bias component DV₀, where D is the duty-cycle of the switch. As will be seen below, the dc bias component is of no consequence. Note that the simple apparatus of FIG. 5 quite naturally provides the necessary synchronization between microprocessor/controller 15 and active voltage source 10 that is required by the apparatus of FIG. 4 for synchronous acquisition of the data samples.

[0042] FIG. 6 discloses apparatus of a second embodiment for measuring complex self-immittance of a general element at a discrete measuring frequency in accordance with the present invention. The embodiment of FIG. 6 functions identically to that disclosed in FIG. 5 except for the way that synchronization between active voltage source 10 and microprocessor/controller 15 is implemented. In FIG. 4, microprocessor/controller 15 initiates synchronization pulses that are communicated to active voltage source 10 via synchronization path 20. The opposite occurs in the apparatus of FIG. 6. Time-varying active voltage source 12 generates a periodic voltage v(t) along with periodic synchronization pulses completely independently of microprocessor/controller 15. The synchronization pulses are communicated to microprocessor/controller 15 via reverse synchronization path 95 and issue interrupts thereupon. A software routine servicing these interrupts provides timing references to identify the appropriate data acquisition times.

[0043] FIG. 7 discloses one possible periodic active voltage source 12 providing such external synchronization. Voltage generator 100, which may, e.g., be a sinusoidal, triangle wave, or square wave voltage generator, generates a periodic voltage waveform v(t). In addition, circuitry 105, which may comprise a zero-crossing detector, generates pulses that identify periodically occurring timing points of the v(t) waveform. These pulses are communicated to microprocessor/controller 15 via reverse synchronization path 95 and provide interrupts for synchronization of the software.

[0044] FIG. 8 discloses a third embodiment of apparatus for measuring complex self-immittance of a general element at a discrete measuring frequency in accordance with the present invention. This embodiment differs from the embodiments disclosed in FIGS. 4 and 6 in that a current serves as excitation and a voltage serves as response rather than a voltage serving as excitation and a current serving as response. A time-varying active voltage source 10 generates a periodic voltage V_A(t) having fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of the desired measuring frequency. Periodic voltage V_A(t) may comprise a sinusoid, a square wave, or any other periodic waveform. Again, the timing of active voltage source 10 is derived from microprocessor/controller 15 via synchronization path 20 and may therefore comprise apparatus such as that disclosed in FIG. 5. Periodic voltage V_A(t) causes current i(t) 110 to flow through the series combination of “viewing” resistor 115 and general element (GE) 5. Current i(t) thus serves as active excitation of general element 5. Assuming for simplicity that the resistance of “viewing” resistor 115 is 1 ohm, the signal voltage developed across resistor 115 is numerically equal to the current excitation i(t). This current signal 120 is applied to the input of differential amplifier 125, and v(t) 130, the voltage response developed across general element 5, is applied to the input of differential amplifier 135. Assuming for simplicity that the voltage gains of differential amplifiers 125 and 135 are each unity, the two signals at the outputs 35 and 40 of these amplifiers are equal to i(t) and v(t), respectively.

[0045] Under programmed control of microprocessor/controller 15 via control path 45, multiplexer 50 selects either i(t) signal at 35 or v(t) signal at 40 for presentation to the input of band-limiting filter 55. The response function F(ω) of filter 55 may comprise either a low-pass response function or a band-pass response function. In addition, filter 55 may comprise either conventional fixed-tuned circuitry or switched-capacitor circuitry having cutoff- or center-frequency under program control via filter clock path 60. The primary function of band-limiting filter 55 is to eliminate higher-order harmonics that cause frequency “aliasing” errors. It also serves to attenuate noise. Note that both v(t) and i(t) signals are processed by the same filter response function F(ω) to yield band-limited signals v′(t) and i′(t). Accordingly, both the attenuation and the phase-shift of F(ω) cancel out of the subsequent determination of complex self-immittance of general element 5.

[0046] Analog to digital converter 65 accepts band-limited signals v′(t) and i′(t) as inputs. Microprocessor/controller 15 strobes these data in synchronism with excitation source 10 via control path 70. The resulting digital samples of v′(t) and i′(t)—acquired at three or more equally spaced times over an excitation period and over one or more consecutive excitation periods—are inputted to microprocessor/controller 15 via data path 75. Using mathematical techniques that are fully disclosed below, microprocessor/controller 15 calculates the complex self-immittance 80 of GE 5 from these synchronously acquired digital data samples.

[0047] The apparatus of FIG. 8 employs current excitation and voltage response and may therefore be considered as means for measuring components of complex self-impedance Z=R+jX. However, since the excitation signal will not be assumed to be a zero-phase reference, excitation and response are mathematically symmetrical. Accordingly, the FIG. 8 apparatus can also be considered means for determining components of complex self-admittance.

[0048] FIG. 9 discloses a modified form of the apparatus of FIG. 8 that is appropriate to accurately measuring complex self-immittance of a very low-impedance general element. The apparatus of FIG. 9 utilizes “four-point” or “Kelvin” connections to the unknown general element 5. Active excitation current i(t) passes through GE 5 via current-carrying contacts A and B. The resulting voltage response v(t) is sensed at separate voltage-sensing contacts C and D. By using separate contacts for applying active current excitation and for detecting voltage response, errors due to contact and lead-wire impedances are avoided. The apparatus of FIG. 9 is identical to that of FIG. 8 in all other respects.

[0049] The theory to be developed below will show that any dc terms in v(t) or i(t) are mathematically ignored when evaluating complex immittance with any of the embodiments depicted in FIG. 4, 6, 8, or 9. Thus, in principle, general element 5 could comprise an active element, such as an electrochemical cell/battery, as well as a passive element such as a combination of resistors, capacitors, and inductors. In practice, however, the intrinsic internal voltage of an active element may be large enough to saturate electronic circuitry. If that is indeed the case, the complex self-immittance of the active element can still be measured approximately by using circuitry disclosed in FIGS. 10 and 11 to make the active element passive.

[0050] FIG. 10 shows a general element 5 comprising an active element (AE) 140 containing an intrinsic dc source in series with a dc blocking capacitor 145. FIG. 11 shows a general element 5 comprising an active element (AE) 140 containing an intrinsic dc source in series with an appropriate dc blocking voltage or “potentiostat” 150. The circuits of FIGS. 10 and 11 both suppress the internal voltage of AE 140 and therefore serve to make the general element 5 a passive element. However, with both circuits, the additional series element, either 145 or 150, appears electrically as part of the measured element 5. Accordingly, the measurements are only approximations whose accuracy depends upon the relative size of the impedance of additional element 145 or 150 compared with the impedance of active element 140. Such measurement errors can be avoided, however, by using techniques in U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,238, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/454,629, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/503,015 when measuring self-immittance of low-impedance active elements.

[0051] The theoretical basis for the measurements described above now follows. We will initially assume that a periodic voltage v(t) excites the unknown general element and that the response thereto is a periodic current i(t). However, for purposes of generality we will not assume either v(t) or i(t) to be a zero-phase reference signal. The initial treatment will therefore apply directly to determining Y=G+jB with any of the four embodiments disclosed in FIG. 4, 6, 8, or 9. In addition, by simply interchanging the roles of voltage and current, the initial results can be extended to determining Z=R+jX with any one of the same four embodiments.

[0052] Assume the excitation to be periodic with fundamental period T. The resulting band-limited periodic voltage and current signals, v′(t) and i′(t) can each be written as finite Fourier series

\begin{matrix} v^{'} (t) = V_{0} + \sum_{k = 1}^{k_{\max}} {V_{k}^{0} \sin (2 π {kf}_{1} t) + V_{k}^{90} \cos (2 π {kf}_{1} t)} and & (1) \\ i^{'} (t) = I_{0} + \sum_{k = 1}^{k_{\max}} {I_{k}^{0} \sin (2 π {kf}_{1} t) + I_{k}^{90} \cos (2 π {kf}_{1} t)} & (2) \end{matrix}

[0053] in which f₁=1/T is the fundamental frequency of the excitation, kf₁=f_kis the k^thharmonic frequency, and k_maxis the index of the highest-order harmonic present in either of the two band-limited signals.

[0054] According to the well-known theory of Fourier analysis, the quantities V_k⁰, V_k⁹⁰, I_k⁰, I_k⁹⁰are Fourier coefficients of v′(t) and i′(t). The four fundamental-frequency (k=1) coefficients are given by the integrals

\begin{matrix} V_{1}^{0} = \frac{2}{T} \int_{0}^{T} v^{'} (t) \sin (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (3) \\ V_{1}^{90} = \frac{2}{T} \int_{0}^{T} v^{'} (t) \cos (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (4) \\ I_{1}^{0} = \frac{2}{T} \int_{0}^{T} i^{'} (t) \sin (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (5) \\ I_{1}^{90} = \frac{2}{T} \int_{0}^{T} i^{'} (t) \cos (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (6) \end{matrix}

[0055] where the integration extends over one period of the excitation.

[0056] One sees from equations (1) and (2) that V₁⁰, V₁⁹⁰, I₁⁰, and I₁⁹⁰represent amplitudes of voltage and current components at the fundamental frequency f₁that are in time-phase (0°) and in time-quadrature (90°), respectively, with a reference zero-phase signal at this frequency. The timing of this reference signal, and hence the relative sizes of the in-phase and quadrature components, is determined by the point in the periodic excitation waveform that is chosen to be t=0 when evaluating integrals (3) through (6). However, as long as the same t=0 point is chosen for all four integrals, the choice of the t=0 point is completely arbitrary and has no effect upon the subsequent calculation of complex Y=G+jB. One sees further that equations (3) through (6) can be considered “sine/cosine correlation integrals” in which the interval of correlation is the fundamental period of the excitation waveform.

[0057] The four integrals, equations (3) through (6), can be evaluated in terms of discrete samples of v′(t) and i′(t) by using a numerical integration technique such as the trapezoidal rule. Assuming M equally spaced samples acquired over one fundamental period of the excitation T, the trapezoidal rule leads to

\begin{matrix} V_{1}^{0} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) \sin (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (7) \\ V_{1}^{90} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) \cos (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (8) \\ I_{1}^{0} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) \sin (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (9) \\ I_{1}^{90} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) \cos (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (10) \end{matrix}

[0058] Because of periodicity of the sine and cosine functions, any dc components of v′(t) and i′(t) cancel out of equations (7) through (10) and are therefore of no consequence.

[0059] The real and imaginary parts of the self-admittance Y=G+jB of GE 5 in FIGS. 4 and 6 follow by dividing fundamental-frequency complex current I₁⁰+jI₁⁹⁰by fundamental-frequency complex voltage V₁⁰+jV₁⁹⁰and rationalizing the quotient. The result is

\begin{matrix} G = (\frac{1}{R_{F}}) \cdot (\frac{I_{1}^{0} V_{1}^{0} + I_{1}^{90} V_{1}^{90}}{{(V_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(V_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) and & (11) \\ B = (\frac{1}{R_{F}}) \cdot (\frac{I_{1}^{90} V_{1}^{0} - I_{1}^{0} V_{1}^{90}}{{(V_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(V_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) & (12) \end{matrix}

[0060] where R_Fis the value of feedback resistor 30 in FIGS. 4 and 6 (which had been assumed to be unity for simplicity). For the embodiments of FIGS. 8 and 9, the comparable equations for G and B are

\begin{matrix} G = (\frac{A_{V}}{R_{V} A_{I}}) \cdot (\frac{I_{1}^{0} V_{1}^{0} + I_{1}^{90} V_{1}^{90}}{{(V_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(V_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) and & (13) \\ B = (\frac{A_{V}}{R_{V} A_{I}}) \cdot (\frac{I_{1}^{90} V_{1}^{0} - I_{1}^{0} V_{1}^{90}}{{(V_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(V_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) & (14) \end{matrix}

[0061] where R_Vis the value of “viewing” resistor 115, A₁is the voltage gain of differential amplifier 125, and A_Vis the voltage gain of differential amplifier 135 (all three of which had been assumed to be unity for simplicity).

[0062] Note that the factor 2/M in equations (7) through (10) will cancel out of the evaluation of equations (11) through (14) so that only the summations need be considered. Note also that the choice of the t=0 sampling point affects the relative sizes of the in-phase and quadrature components determined from equations (7) through (10). However, as long as the same t=0 point is used for sampling both v′(t) and i′(t), the choice is arbitrary and has no effect upon the values of G and B determined from equations (11) through (14). The attenuation and phase shift of the filter response function, F(ω), likewise have no effect on the computed results since both v′(t) and i′(t) are processed identically by F(ω).

[0063] By simply interchanging the roles of voltage and current in equations (11) through (14), the equations can be extended to find the components of complex self-impedance Z=R+jX. The results are

\begin{matrix} R = (R_{F}) \cdot (\frac{V_{1}^{0} I_{1}^{0} + V_{1}^{90} I_{1}^{90}}{{(I_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(I_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) & (15) \\ X = (R_{F}) \cdot (\frac{V_{1}^{90} I_{1}^{0} - V_{1}^{0} I_{1}^{90}}{{(I_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(I_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) & (16) \\ R = (\frac{R_{V} A_{I}}{A_{V}}) \cdot (\frac{V_{1}^{0} I_{1}^{0} + V_{1}^{90} I_{1}^{90}}{{(I_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(I_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) and & (17) \\ X = (\frac{R_{V} A_{I}}{A_{V}}) \cdot (\frac{V_{1}^{90} I_{1}^{0} - V_{1}^{0} I_{1}^{90}}{{(I_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(I_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) & (18) \end{matrix}

[0064] Although numerical integration techniques are generally regarded to be approximations, my calculations prove that equations (7) through (10) are exact as long as the following criterion is satisfied:

[0065] M≧k_max+2 (19)

[0066] where M is the number of evenly spaced samples acquired over one period T, and k_maxis the order of the highest-order harmonic present in the Fourier series representation of v′(t) and i′(t). As a consequence of equation (19), only three samples, spaced 120 degrees apart, are required to exactly evaluate Fourier coefficients of a pure sinusoid (k_max=1). However, if a Fourier series contains terms up to, say, the 8^thharmonic, at least 10 samples in one period are necessary to obtain exact evaluations of the fundamental-frequency Fourier coefficients.

[0067] When equation (19) is not satisfied, undersampling occurs and causes frequency “aliasing” errors. I have evaluated these errors by considering the effects of synchronous sampling upon signals that are not band-limited. These results can be summarized as follows:

\begin{matrix} V_{1}^{0} (exact) = V_{1}^{0} (M) + \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} {V_{(nM - 1)}^{0} - V_{(nM + 1)}^{0}} & (20) \\ V_{1}^{90} (exact) = V_{1}^{90} (M) - \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} {V_{(nM - 1)}^{90} + V_{(nM + 1)}^{90}} & (21) \\ I_{1}^{0} (exact) = I_{1}^{0} (M) + \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} {I_{(nM - 1)}^{0} - I_{(nM + 1)}^{0}} & (22) \\ I_{1}^{90} (exact) = I_{1}^{90} (M) - \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} {I_{(nM - 1)}^{90} + I_{(nM + 1)}^{90}} & (23) \end{matrix}

[0068] where V₁⁰(exact), V₁⁹⁰(exact), I₁⁹⁰(exact), I₁⁹⁰(exact), are the correct (exact) values of the fundamental-frequency Fourier coefficients, and V₁⁰(M), V₁⁹⁰(M), I₁⁰(M), I₁⁹⁰(M) are values calculated from equations (7) through (10) using M samples acquired over one period. Accordingly, the summations on the right-hand sides of equations (20) through (23) represent undersampling errors. With rapidly converging Fourier series, only the first term in each of these summations (k=M−1) is significant. One sees that, in complete agreement with equation (19), the presence of the 2^ndharmonic term will cause errors in determining fundamental-frequency Fourier coefficients with M=3. However, with M=10, the lowest-order harmonic term to cause such errors is the 9^thharmonic.

[0069] In principle, the fundamental-frequency Fourier coefficients of signals that are appropriately band-limited can be evaluated exactly from M evenly spaced samples acquired over only a single period. However, measurements made in the presence of electrical noise may contain noise-induced random errors. Fortunately, noise signals that are not correlated with sin(2πf₁t) and cos(2πf₁t) will, on average, make equal positive and negative contributions to the correlation integrals. Thus, their effects can be removed by averaging over multiple periods. Consider averaging the four fundamental-frequency Fourier coefficients over N periods, where N is an integer. The results are written

\begin{matrix} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{NT} \int_{0}^{NT} v^{'} (t) \sin (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (24) \\ {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{NT} \int_{0}^{NT} v^{'} (t) \cos (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (25) \\ {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{NT} \int_{0}^{NT} i^{'} (t) \sin (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (26) \\ {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{NT} \int_{0}^{NT} i^{'} (t) \cos (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (27) \end{matrix}

[0070] Note that averaging the Fourier coefficients over N periods effectively extends the interval of correlation of the correlation integrals to NT.

[0071] Since the numerical evaluations disclosed in equations (7)-(10) express linear relationships, the order of averaging and of summing can be interchanged. That is, the average of the sum is equal to the sum of the averages:

\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} = ⟨ v^{'} (0) \sin (0) + v^{'} (\frac{T}{M}) \sin (\frac{2 π}{M}) + \\ {v^{'} (\frac{2 T}{M}) \sin (\frac{4 π}{M}) + \dots ⟩}_{av} \\ = {⟨ v^{'} (0) ⟩}_{av} \sin (0) + {⟨ v^{'} (\frac{T}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \sin (\frac{2 π}{M}) + \\ {⟨ v^{'} (\frac{2 T}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \sin (\frac{4 π}{M}) + \dots \end{matrix} & (28) \end{matrix}

[0072] with similar results applying to (V₁⁹⁰)_av, (I₁⁰)_av, and (I₁⁹⁰)_av. Accordingly, the time-averaged Fourier coefficients can be conveniently evaluated by simply averaging the sampled values themselves over N periods and then applying the trapezoidal rule to the time-averaged data samples. The N-period sample-averages can be written

\begin{matrix} {⟨ v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{p = 0}^{(N - 1)} v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M} + pT) & (29) \\ {⟨ i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{p = 0}^{(N - 1)} i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M} + pT) & (30) \end{matrix}

[0073] Applying the trapezoidal rule to these averages leads to

\begin{matrix} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {{⟨ v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \sin (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (31) \\ {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {{⟨ v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \cos (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (32) \\ {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {{⟨ i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \sin (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (33) \\ {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {{⟨ i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \cos (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (34) \end{matrix}

[0074] where M is number of samples acquired in a single period. Finally, real and imaginary parts of the GE complex self-admittance for the embodiments of FIGS. 4 and 6 follow by dividing the time-averaged fundamental-frequency complex current (I₁⁰)_av+j(I₁⁹⁰)_avby the time-averaged fundamental-frequency complex voltage (V₁⁰)_av+j(V₁⁹⁰)_avand rationalizing the quotient. The result is

\begin{matrix} G = (\frac{1}{R_{F}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) and & (35) \\ B = (\frac{1}{R_{F}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} - {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) & (36) \end{matrix}

[0075] while for the embodiments of FIGS. 8 and 9

\begin{matrix} G = (\frac{A_{V}}{R_{V} A_{I}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) and & (37) \\ B = (\frac{A_{V}}{R_{V} A_{I}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} - {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) & (38) \end{matrix}

[0076] Interchanging the roles of voltage and current in equations (35) through (38) to determine the components of complex self-impedance Z=R+jX leads to

\begin{matrix} R = (R_{F}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) & (39) \\ X = (R_{F}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} - {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) & (40) \\ R = (\frac{R_{V} A_{I}}{A_{V}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) and & (41) \\ X = (\frac{R_{V} A_{I}}{A_{V}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} - {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) & (42) \end{matrix}

[0077] Note that the common factors 1/N in equations (29) and (30) and 2/M in equations (31)-(34) will cancel out of the evaluations of equations (35)-(42). Accordingly, only the summations themselves in equations (29)-(34) need be considered.

[0078] The combination of synchronously acquiring M samples/period, averaging (or summing) over N periods, and numerically evaluating fundamental-frequency Fourier coefficients leads to a pronounced digital-filtering action that effectively suppresses noise by strongly favoring signals at exactly the synchronous (excitation) frequency. These results are illustrated in the theoretical plots of FIGS. 12-17. The plots of FIGS. 12-17 all assume the synchronous frequency to be 5 Hz and investigate the effect of varying the frequency of an assumed sinusoidal input signal.

[0079] FIG. 12 shows that with M=5 samples per period averaged or summed over N=64 periods, signals only 1 Hz from the synchronous frequency are attenuated by more than 30 decibels. FIG. 13 shows a comparable plot for signals that have been averaged or summed over N=256 periods. One sees that the attenuation 1 Hz from the synchronous frequency has been increased to 48 decibels by this increase in the correlation interval.

[0080] FIGS. 14 and 15 show comparable plots with M increased to 10 samples per period. This increase in M is seen to have no observable effect throughout the frequency range from 4 to 6 Hz. Such a result is consistent with the discussion above regarding equations (19) through (23). That discussion concludes that the value of M primarily affects frequency “aliasing” of the synchronous input signal. Such effects can only be observed at frequencies that are harmonics of the synchronous frequency.

[0081] FIGS. 16 and 17 illustrate the influence of the number of samples per period M on the harmonic response at frequencies up to 100 Hz. FIG. 16 shows that with M=5, there are observable harmonic response “peaks” at 20 Hz (4^thharmonic), 30 Hz (6^thharmonic), 45 Hz (9^thharmonic), 55 Hz (11^thharmonic), 70 Hz (14^thharmonic), 80 Hz (16^thharmonic), and 95 Hz (19^thharmonic). However, with M=10, (FIG. 17) the only response “peaks” observed are at the 9^th, 11^th, and 19^thharmonic frequencies. These results agree exactly with predictions based upon equations (20) through (23). Band-limiting filter F(ω) serves primarily to ensure that all of the harmonic components of v′(t) and i′(t) are negligible at such response frequencies.

[0082] This completes the disclosure of my invention. The invention is extremely accurate and is relatively inexpensive to implement. In summary, the steps leading to the evaluation of components of complex self-impedance/admittance of a general electrical element at a discrete measuring frequency in accordance with my invention include one or more of the following:

[0083] Exciting the general element with a source of periodic voltage or current that has a fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of the measuring frequency.

[0084] Sensing a time-varying signal proportional to the periodic voltage or current excitation, and a second time-varying signal proportional to the general element's periodic current or voltage response.

[0085] Processing both signals with identical low-pass or band-pass filter-response functions to provide band-limited excitation and response signals.

[0086] Sampling the band-limited excitation and response signals in synchronism with the excitation waveform at three or more equally spaced times over a period and over one or more consecutive periods.

[0087] Converting the data samples to digital format.

[0088] Averaging or summing the individual digital samples over one or more periods (equations (29) and (30)).

[0089] Multiplying the averaged or summed data by appropriate sine/cosine values and summing the results to numerically evaluate sine/cosine correlation integrals (equations (31)-(34)).

[0090] Numerically combining the values of the sine/cosine correlation integrals to obtain the components of complex self-impedance/admittance of the general electrical element (equations (35)-(42)).

[0091] The disclosed invention is quite immune to electrical noise and can measure general electrical elements that are actually in use in electrical circuits. Its inherent noise immunity results from two different factors. First, placing identical band-limiting filters in the i(t) and v(t) signal paths attenuates noise before the signals are sampled. Second, averaging or summing the synchronously acquired digital samples over multiple periods provides an additional digital filtering effect that further attenuates noise signals not correlated with sin(2πf₁t) and cos(2πf₁t). Either one of these two techniques could be employed separately without departing from the true spirit and scope of my invention.

[0092] For example, in low-noise situations, one could sample v′(t) and i′(t) over only one period. Similarly, if higher-order harmonics of the excitation and response waveforms were sufficiently small, one could leave out the band-limiting filters and rely solely upon synchronous-sampling/averaging to suppress noise. Finally, with both low-noise and small harmonics, both the band-limiting filters and averaging/summing over multiple periods could be dispensed with. These variations all fall within the purview of my invention.

[0093] Furthermore, one could express complex immittance in terms of magnitude and phase rather than real and imaginary parts, or could utilize my invention to evaluate only one of the two components of complex immittance. One could also use different values of M or N for the current signal than for the voltage signal and could interchange the order of numerical integration and averaging (see equation (28)). Also, excitation and response signals having half-period symmetry need only be sampled during alternate half-periods rather than over full-period intervals. Finally, rather than a single multiplexed band-limiting filter, one could use separate filters in the i′(t) and v′(t) signal paths, provided that the two filters are sufficiently well matched. Workers skilled in the art will recognize that these and other variations may be made in form and detail without departing from the true spirit and scope of my invention. For example, specific frequencies, harmonics, specifics set forth herein can be modified in accordance with the invention. The actual elements used to implement the invention can be embodied in hardware, software, or their combination. The various elements set forth in the figures, for example, can be implemented using hardware and software components.

Claims

Certificate of Correction present

The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.

What is claimed is:

1. Apparatus for evaluating at least one component of complex self-immittance of an electrical element at a discrete frequency comprising:

excitation circuitry adapted to excite said element with periodic excitation characterized by a fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of said discrete frequency;

excitation signal sense and process circuitry adapted to provide an excitation signal in accordance with said periodic excitation;

response signal sense and process circuitry adapted to provide a response signal in accordance with a periodic response of said electrical element to said periodic excitation;

excitation signal sample and convert circuitry adapted to provide digital representations of sampled values of said excitation signal, said sampled values acquired at discrete excitation signal sampling times synchronized with said periodic excitation and distributed in time over one or more half-period or full-period intervals of said fundamental period;

response signal sample and convert circuitry adapted to provide digital representations of sampled values of said response signal, said sampled values acquired at discrete response signal sampling times synchronized with said periodic excitation and distributed in time over one or more half-period or full-period intervals of said fundamental period; and,

computation and control circuitry adapted to initiate said excitation signal sampling times, to initiate said response signal sampling times, and to numerically combine said digital representations of said sampled values of said excitation signal and said digital representations of said sampled values of said response signal to evaluate at least one said component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency.

2. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic voltage excitation and said periodic response is a periodic current response.

3. Apparatus as in claim 2 wherein said response signal sense and process circuitry includes an operational amplifier configured as a current-to-voltage converter.

4. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic current excitation and said periodic response is a periodic voltage response.

5. Apparatus as in claim 4 wherein said excitation signal sense and process circuitry includes a viewing resistor connected in series with said electrical element.

6. Apparatus as in claim 4 including separate contacts to said element for applying said periodic current excitation and for sensing said periodic voltage response.

7. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said excitation signal sense and process circuitry and said response signal sense and process circuitry include filtering circuitry adapted to process both said excitation signal and said response signal with identical filter response functions.

8. Apparatus as in claim 7 wherein said filter response functions are low-pass filter response functions.

9. Apparatus as in claim 7 wherein said filter response functions are band-pass filter response functions.

10. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said computation and control circuitry is further adapted to initiate the timing of said periodic excitation and to identify said excitation signal sampling times and said response signal sampling times by measuring from a periodically repeating timing point of said periodic excitation.

11. Apparatus as in claim 10 wherein said excitation circuitry includes a voltage source and a controlled switch and said computation and control circuitry initiates said timing of said periodic excitation by periodically turning said controlled switch on and off thereby periodically interrupting a current through said voltage source.

12. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said excitation circuitry includes waveform generating and timing circuitry adapted to spontaneously generate said periodic excitation and to communicate synchronous periodic timing pulses to said computation and control circuitry, said computation and control circuitry being adapted to identify said excitation signal sampling times and said response signal sampling times by measuring from said timing pulses.

13. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic square wave excitation.

14. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic sine wave excitation.

15. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said computation and control circuitry is further adapted to average or sum said digital representations of said sampled values of said excitation signal over one or more periods to obtain time-averaged excitation results, to average or sum said digital representations of said sampled values of said response signal over one or more periods to obtain time-averaged response results, to numerically combine said time-averaged excitation results with appropriate sine and cosine values to evaluate excitation sine and cosine correlation integrals, to numerically combine said time-averaged response results with appropriate sine and cosine values to evaluate response sine and cosine correlation integrals, and to numerically combine said excitation sine and cosine correlation integrals and said response sine and cosine correlation integrals to evaluate at least one component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency.

16. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking capacitor in series.

17. Apparatus as in claim 1 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking voltage in series.

18. Apparatus for evaluating at least one component of complex self-immittance of an electrical element at a discrete frequency comprising:

excitation circuitry adapted to excite said element with periodic excitation characterized by a fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of said discrete frequency;

excitation signal sense circuitry adapted to provide an excitation signal in accordance with said periodic excitation;

response signal sense circuitry adapted to provide a response signal in accordance with a periodic response of said electrical element to said periodic excitation;

filter circuitry characterized by a frequency response characteristic and adapted to provide a band-limited excitation signal in accordance with said frequency response characteristic and a band-limited response signal in accordance with the same said frequency response characteristic; and,

evaluate circuitry adapted to provide values of at least one said component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency in accordance with said band-limited excitation signal and said band-limited response signal.

19. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said evaluate circuitry comprises:

sample and convert circuitry adapted to provide digital representations of sampled values of said band-limited excitation signal and of said band-limited response signal, said sampled values obtained at periodically repeating sample times synchronized to said periodic excitation and distributed in time over at least one half-period or full-period interval of said fundamental period of said periodic excitation; and,

computation and control circuitry adapted to initiate said sample times and to compute at least one said component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency from said digital representations of said sampled values of said band-limited excitation signal and said band-limited response signal.

20. Apparatus as in claim 19 wherein said computation and control circuitry is further adapted to initiate the timing of said periodic excitation and to identify said sample times by measuring from a periodically repeating timing point of said periodic excitation.

21. Apparatus as in claim 20 wherein said excitation circuitry includes a controlled switch and a voltage source, and said computation and control circuitry initiates said timing of said periodic excitation by periodically turning said controlled switch on and off thereby periodically interrupting a current through said voltage source.

22. Apparatus as in claim 19 wherein said excitation circuitry includes waveform generating and timing circuitry adapted to spontaneously generate said periodic excitation and to communicate periodic timing pulses to said computation and control circuitry in synchronism with said periodic excitation, said computation and control circuitry being adapted to identify said sample times by measuring from said periodic timing pulses.

23. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic voltage excitation and said periodic response is a periodic current response.

24. Apparatus as in claim 23 wherein said response signal sense circuitry includes an operational amplifier configured as a current-to-voltage converter.

25. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic current excitation and said periodic response is a periodic voltage response.

26. Apparatus as in claim 25 wherein said excitation signal sense circuitry includes a viewing resistor connected in series with said electrical element.

27. Apparatus as in claim 25 including separate contacts to said element for applying said periodic current excitation and for sensing said periodic voltage response.

28. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said frequency response characteristic is a low-pass frequency response characteristic.

29. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said frequency response characteristic is a band-pass frequency response characteristic.

30. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said filter circuitry comprises a pair of matched filter circuits adapted to separately provide said band-limited excitation signal and said band-limited response signal.

31. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said filter circuitry comprises a single filter circuit adapted to provide both said band-limited excitation signal and said band-limited response signal.

32. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic square wave excitation.

33. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic sine wave excitation.

34. Apparatus as in claim 19 wherein said computation and control circuitry is further adapted to average or sum said digital representations of said sampled values of said band-limited excitation signal over one or more periods to obtain time-averaged excitation results, to average or sum said digital representations of said sampled values of said band-limited response signal over one or more periods to obtain time-averaged response results, to numerically combine said time-averaged excitation results with appropriate sine and cosine values to evaluate excitation sine and cosine correlation integrals, to numerically combine said time-averaged response results with appropriate sine and cosine values to evaluate response sine and cosine correlation integrals, and to numerically combine said excitation sine and cosine correlation integrals and said response sine and cosine correlation integrals to evaluate at least one component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency.

35. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking capacitor in series.

36. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking voltage in series.

37. A method for determining at least one component of complex self-immittance of an electrical element at a discrete frequency comprising:

exciting said electrical element with periodic time-varying excitation characterized by a fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of said discrete frequency;

sensing an excitation signal proportional to said periodic time-varying excitation and a response signal proportional to a periodic time-varying response of said electrical element to said periodic time-varying excitation;

processing said excitation signal and said response signal with identical frequency response functions to obtain a band-limited excitation signal and a band-limited response signal; and,

combining said band-limited excitation signal and said band-limited response signal to determine at least one said component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency.

38. A method as in claim 37 wherein combining said band-limited excitation signal and said band-limited response signal further comprises:

sampling said band-limited excitation signal and said band-limited response signal at sampling times synchronized to said periodic time-varying excitation to obtain data samples and converting said data samples to digital format; and,

computing at least one said component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency from said data samples converted to said digital format.

39. A method according to claim 38 wherein computing further comprises:

time-averaging said data samples converted to digital format over one or more periods to obtain time-averaged digital samples;

evaluating sine and cosine correlation integrals from said time-averaged digital samples; and,

combining said sine and cosine correlation integrals numerically to determine at least one said component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency.

40. A method as in claim 37 wherein exciting said electrical element with said periodic time-varying excitation comprises exciting said electrical element with periodic square-wave excitation.

41. A method as in claim 37 wherein exciting said electrical element with said periodic time-varying excitation comprises exciting said electrical element with periodic sinusoidal excitation.

42. A method according to claim 37 wherein processing said excitation signal and said response signal with identical frequency response functions comprises processing said excitation signal and said response signal with identical low-pass frequency response functions.

43. A method according to claim 37 wherein processing said excitation signal and said response signal with identical frequency response functions comprises processing said excitation signal and said response signal with identical band-pass frequency response functions.

44. A method as in claim 37 wherein said periodic time-varying excitation is a periodic time-varying voltage excitation and said periodic time-varying response is a periodic time-varying current response.

45. A method as in claim 37 wherein said periodic time-varying excitation is a periodic time-varying current excitation and said periodic time-varying response is a periodic time-varying voltage response.

46. A method as in claim 37 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking capacitor in series.

47. A method as in claim 37 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking voltage in series.

48. A method for determining at least one component of complex self-immittance of an electrical element at a discrete frequency comprising:

exciting said electrical element with periodic time-varying excitation characterized by a fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of said discrete frequency;

forming an excitation signal in accordance with said periodic time-varying excitation and a response signal in accordance with a time-varying response of said electrical element to said periodic time-varying excitation;

sampling said excitation signal and said response signal at times synchronized with said periodic time-varying excitation and distributed over one or more half-period or full-period intervals of said periodic time-varying excitation, and converting sampled values to digital format;

time-averaging said sampled values over one or more periods to obtain time-averaged sampled values;

evaluating sine and cosine correlation integrals from said time-averaged sample values; and,

numerically combining said sine and cosine correlation integrals to determine at least one said component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency.

49. A method as in claim 48 wherein forming said excitation signal and said response signal includes processing said excitation signal and said response signal with identical low-pass frequency response functions.

50. A method as in claim 48 wherein forming said excitation signal and said response signal includes processing said excitation signal and said response signal with identical band-pass frequency response functions.

51. A method as in claim 48 wherein exciting said electrical element with periodic time-varying excitation comprises exciting said electrical element with periodic time-varying square-wave excitation.

52. A method as in claim 48 wherein exciting said electrical element with periodic time-varying excitation comprises exciting said electrical element with periodic time-varying sinusoidal excitation.

53. A method as in claim 48 wherein said periodic time-varying excitation is a periodic time-varying voltage excitation and said periodic time-varying response is a periodic time-varying current response.

54. A method as in claim 48 wherein said periodic time-varying excitation is a periodic time-varying current excitation and said periodic time-varying response is a periodic time-varying voltage response.

55. A method as in claim 48 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking capacitor in series.

56. A method as in claim 48 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking voltage in series.

57. Apparatus for determining at least one component of complex self-immittance of an electrical element at a discrete frequency adapted for performing the steps according to claim 37.

58. Apparatus for determining at least one component of complex self-immittance of an electrical element at a discrete frequency adapted for performing the steps according to claim 48.

59. Apparatus for evaluating at least one component of complex self-immittance of an electrical element at a discrete frequency comprising:

excitation circuitry adapted to excite said element with periodic excitation characterized by a fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of said discrete frequency;

an excitation signal related to said periodic excitation;

a response signal related to a periodic response of said electrical element to said periodic excitation;

digital representations of sampled values of said excitation signal, said sampled values acquired at discrete excitation signal sampling times synchronized with said periodic excitation and distributed in time over one or more half-period or full-period intervals of said fundamental period;

digital representations of sampled values of said response signal, said sampled values acquired at discrete response signal sampling times synchronized with said periodic excitation and distributed in time over one or more half-period or full-period intervals of said fundamental period; and,

60. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic voltage excitation and said periodic response is a periodic current response.

61. Apparatus as in claim 60 including an operational amplifier configured as a current-to-voltage converter.

62. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic current excitation and said periodic response is a periodic voltage response.

63. Apparatus as in claim 62 including a viewing resistor connected in series with said electrical element.

64. Apparatus as in claim 62 including separate contacts to said element for applying said periodic current excitation and for sensing said periodic voltage response.

65. Apparatus as in claim 59 including filtering circuitry adapted to process both said excitation signal and said response signal with identical filter response functions.

66. Apparatus as in claim 65 wherein said filter response functions are low-pass filter response functions.

67. Apparatus as in claim 65 wherein said filter response functions are band-pass filter response functions.

68. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said computation and control circuitry is further adapted to initiate the timing of said periodic excitation and to identify said excitation signal sampling times and said response signal sampling times by measuring from a periodically repeating timing point of said periodic excitation.

69. Apparatus as in claim 68 wherein said excitation circuitry includes a voltage source and a controlled switch and said computation and control circuitry initiates said timing of said periodic excitation by periodically turning said controlled switch on and off thereby periodically interrupting a current through said voltage source.

70. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said excitation circuitry includes waveform generating and timing circuitry adapted to spontaneously generate said periodic excitation and to communicate synchronous periodic timing pulses to said computation and control circuitry, said computation and control circuitry being adapted to identify said excitation signal sampling times and said response signal sampling times by measuring from said timing pulses.

71. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic square wave excitation.

72. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic sine wave excitation.

73. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said computation and control circuitry is further adapted to average or sum said digital representations of said sampled values of said excitation signal over one or more periods to obtain time-averaged excitation results, to average or sum said digital representations of said sampled values of said response signal over one or more periods to obtain time-averaged response results, to numerically combine said time-averaged excitation results with appropriate sine and cosine values to evaluate excitation sine and cosine correlation integrals, to numerically combine said time-averaged response results with appropriate sine and cosine values to evaluate response sine and cosine correlation integrals, and to numerically combine said excitation sine and cosine correlation integrals and said response sine and cosine correlation integrals to evaluate at least one component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency.

74. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking capacitor in series.

75. Apparatus as in claim 59 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking voltage in series.

76. Apparatus for evaluating at least one component of complex self-immittance of an electrical element at a discrete frequency comprising:

excitation circuitry adapted to excite said element with periodic excitation characterized by a fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of said discrete frequency;

an excitation signal related to said periodic excitation;

a response signal related to a periodic response of said electrical element to said periodic excitation;

a band-limited excitation signal related to said excitation signal and to a frequency response characteristic

a band-limited response signal related to said response signal and to said frequency response characteristic; and,

77. Apparatus as in claim 76 wherein said evaluate circuitry comprises:

78. Apparatus as in claim 77 wherein said computation and control circuitry is further adapted to initiate the timing of said periodic excitation and to identify said sample times by measuring from a periodically repeating timing point of said periodic excitation.

79. Apparatus as in claim 78 wherein said excitation circuitry includes a controlled switch and a voltage source, and said computation and control circuitry initiates said timing of said periodic excitation by periodically turning said controlled switch on and off thereby periodically interrupting a current through said voltage source.

80. Apparatus as in claim 77 wherein said excitation circuitry includes waveform generating and timing circuitry adapted to spontaneously generate said periodic excitation and to communicate periodic timing pulses to said computation and control circuitry in synchronism with said periodic excitation, said computation and control circuitry being adapted to identify said sample times by measuring from said periodic timing pulses.

81. Apparatus as in claim 76 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic voltage excitation and said periodic response is a periodic current response.

82. Apparatus as in claim 81 including an operational amplifier configured as a current-to-voltage converter.

83. Apparatus as in claim 76 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic current excitation and said periodic response is a periodic voltage response.

84. Apparatus as in claim 83 including a viewing resistor connected in series with said electrical element.

85. Apparatus as in claim 83 including separate contacts to said element for applying said periodic current excitation and for sensing said periodic voltage response.

86. Apparatus as in claim 76 wherein said frequency response characteristic is a low-pass frequency response characteristic.

87. Apparatus as in claim 76 wherein said frequency response characteristic is a band-pass frequency response characteristic.

88. Apparatus as in claim 76 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic square wave excitation.

89. Apparatus as in claim 76 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic sine wave excitation.

90. Apparatus as in claim 77 wherein said computation and control circuitry is further adapted to average or sum said digital representations of said sampled values of said band-limited excitation signal over one or more periods to obtain time-averaged excitation results, to average or sum said digital representations of said sampled values of said band-limited response signal over one or more periods to obtain time-averaged response results, to numerically combine said time-averaged excitation results with appropriate sine and cosine values to evaluate excitation sine and cosine correlation integrals, to numerically combine said time-averaged response results with appropriate sine and cosine values to evaluate response sine and cosine correlation integrals, and to numerically combine said excitation sine and cosine correlation integrals and said response sine and cosine correlation integrals to evaluate at least one component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency.

91. Apparatus as in claim 76 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking capacitor in series.

92. Apparatus as in claim 76 wherein said electrical element comprises an active electrical element and a dc blocking voltage in series.

93. Apparatus for evaluating at least one component of complex self-immittance of an electrical element at a discrete frequency comprising:

means adapted to excite said element with periodic excitation characterized by a fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of said discrete frequency;

means adapted to provide an excitation signal in accordance with said periodic excitation;

means adapted to provide a response signal in accordance with a periodic response of said electrical element to said periodic excitation;

means adapted to provide digital representations of sampled values of said excitation signal, said sampled values acquired at discrete excitation signal sampling times synchronized with said periodic excitation and distributed in time over one or more half-period or full-period intervals of said fundamental period;

means adapted to provide digital representations of sampled values of said response signal, said sampled values acquired at discrete response signal sampling times synchronized with said periodic excitation and distributed in time over one or more half-period or full-period intervals of said fundamental period; and,

means adapted to initiate said excitation signal sampling times, to initiate said response signal sampling times, and to numerically combine said digital representations of said sampled values of said excitation signal and said digital representations of said sampled values of said response signal to evaluate at least one said component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency.

94. Apparatus as in claim 93 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic voltage excitation and said periodic response is a periodic current response.

95. Apparatus as in claim 93 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic current excitation and said periodic response is a periodic voltage response.

96. Apparatus as in claim 93 including means adapted to process both said excitation signal and said response signal with identical low-pass or band-pass filter response functions.

97. Apparatus for evaluating at least one component of complex self-immittance of an electrical element at a discrete frequency comprising:

means adapted to excite said element with periodic excitation characterized by a fundamental period equal to the reciprocal of said discrete frequency;

means adapted to provide an excitation signal in accordance with said periodic excitation;

means adapted to provide a response signal in accordance with a periodic response of said electrical element to said periodic excitation;

filter means characterized by a frequency response characteristic and adapted to provide a band-limited excitation signal in accordance with said frequency response characteristic and a band-limited response signal in accordance with the same said frequency response characteristic; and,

means adapted to provide values of at least one said component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency in accordance with said band-limited excitation signal and said band-limited response signal.

98. Apparatus as in claim 97 wherein said means adapted to provide values of at least one said component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency comprises:

means adapted to provide digital representations of sampled values of said band-limited excitation signal and of said band-limited response signal, said sampled values obtained at periodically repeating sample times synchronized to said periodic excitation and distributed in time over at least one half-period or full-period interval of said fundamental period of said periodic excitation; and,

means adapted to compute at least one said component of said complex self-immittance of said electrical element at said discrete frequency from said digital representations of said sampled values of said band-limited excitation signal and of said band-limited response signal.

99. Apparatus as in claim 97 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic voltage excitation and said periodic response is a periodic current response.

100. Apparatus as in claim 97 wherein said periodic excitation is a periodic current excitation and said periodic response is a periodic voltage response.

Patent Citations (196)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US2514745	1950-07-01	Dalzell	Applicant
US3356936	1967-12-01	Smith	Applicant
US3562634	1971-02-01	Latner	Applicant
US3593099	1971-07-01	Scholl	Applicant
US3607673	1971-09-01	Seyl	Applicant
US3676770	1972-07-01	Sharaf et al.	Applicant
US3729989	1973-05-01	Little	Applicant
US3753094	1973-08-01	Furuishi et al.	Applicant
US3808522	1974-04-01	Sharaf	Applicant
US3811089	1974-05-01	Streselewicz	Applicant
US3873911	1975-03-01	Champlin	Applicant
US3886443	1975-05-01	Miyakawa et al.	Applicant
US3889248	1975-06-01	Ritter	Applicant
US3906329	1975-09-01	Bader	Applicant
US3909708	1975-09-01	Champlin	Applicant
US3936744	1976-02-01	Perlmutter	Applicant
US3946299	1976-03-01	Christianson et al.	Applicant
US3947757	1976-03-01	Grube et al.	Applicant
US3969667	1976-07-01	McWilliams	Applicant
US3979664	1976-09-01	Harris	Applicant
US3984762	1976-10-01	Dowgiallo, Jr.	Applicant
US3984768	1976-10-01	Staples	Applicant
US3989544	1976-11-01	Santo	Applicant
US4008619	1977-02-01	Alcaide et al.	Applicant
US4053824	1977-10-01	Dupuis et al.	Applicant
US4070624	1978-01-01	Taylor	Applicant
US4086531	1978-04-01	Bernier	Applicant
US4112351	1978-09-01	Back et al.	Applicant
US4114083	1978-09-01	Benham et al.	Applicant
US4126874	1978-11-01	Suzuki et al.	Applicant
US4178546	1979-12-01	Hulls et al.	Applicant
US4193025	1980-03-01	Frailing et al.	Applicant
US4207611	1980-06-01	Gordon	Applicant
US4315204	1982-02-01	Sievers et al.	Applicant
US4316185	1982-02-01	Watrous et al.	Applicant
US4322685	1982-03-01	Frailing et al.	Applicant
US4363407	1982-12-01	Barkler et al.	Applicant
US4369407	1983-01-01	Korbell	Applicant
US4379990	1983-04-01	Sievers et al.	Applicant
US4390828	1983-06-01	Converse et al.	Applicant
US4392101	1983-07-01	Saar er al.	Applicant
US4396880	1983-08-01	Windebank	Applicant
US4408157	1983-10-01	Beaubien	Applicant
US4412169	1983-10-01	Dell'Orto	Applicant
US4423378	1983-12-01	Marino et al.	Applicant
US4423379	1983-12-01	Jacobs et al.	Applicant
US4424491	1984-01-01	Bobbett et al.	Applicant
US4459548	1984-07-01	Lentz et al.	Applicant
US4514694	1985-04-01	Finger	Applicant
US4520353	1985-05-01	McAuliffe	Applicant
US4667279	1987-05-01	Maier	Applicant
US4678998	1987-07-01	Muramatsu	Applicant
US4679000	1987-07-01	Clark	Applicant
US4697134	1987-09-01	Burkum et al.	Applicant
US4707795	1987-11-01	Alber et al.	Applicant
US4709202	1987-11-01	Koenck et al.	Applicant
US4710861	1987-12-01	Kanner	Applicant
US4719428	1988-01-01	Liebermann	Applicant
US4743855	1988-05-01	Randin et al.	Applicant
US4745349	1988-05-01	Palanisamy et al.	Applicant
US4816768	1989-03-01	Champlin	Applicant
US4820966	1989-04-01	Fridman	Applicant
US4825170	1989-04-01	Champlin	Applicant
US4849700	1989-07-01	Morioka et al.	Applicant
US4876495	1989-10-01	Palanisamy et al.	Applicant
US4881038	1989-11-01	Champlin	Applicant
US4912416	1990-03-01	Champlin	Applicant
US4929931	1990-05-01	McCuen	Applicant
US4931798	1990-06-01	MacIntyre et al.	Applicant
US4937528	1990-06-01	Palanisamy	Applicant
US4947124	1990-08-01	Hauser	Applicant
US4956597	1990-09-01	Heavey et al.	Applicant
US4968941	1990-11-01	Rogers	Applicant
US4968942	1990-11-01	Palanisamy	Applicant
US5004979	1991-04-01	Marino et al.	Applicant
US5032825	1991-07-01	Xuznicki	Applicant
US5047722	1991-09-01	Wurst et al.	Applicant
US5087881	1992-02-01	Peacock	Applicant
US5126675	1992-06-01	Yang	Applicant
US5140269	1992-08-01	Champlin	Applicant
US5144218	1992-09-01	Bosscha	Applicant
US5144248	1992-09-01	Alexandres et al.	Applicant
US5170124	1992-12-01	Blair et al.	Applicant
US5179335	1993-01-01	Nor	Applicant
US5204611	1993-04-01	Nor et al.	Applicant
US5214370	1993-05-01	Harm et al.	Applicant
US5214385	1993-05-01	Gabriel et al.	Applicant
US5241275	1993-08-01	Fang	Applicant
US5254952	1993-10-01	Salley et al.	Applicant
US5266880	1993-11-01	Newland	Applicant
US5281919	1994-01-01	Palanisamy	Applicant
US5281920	1994-01-01	Wurst	Applicant
US5295078	1994-03-01	Stich et al.	Applicant
US5298797	1994-03-01	Redl	Applicant
US5300874	1994-04-01	Shimamoto et al.	Applicant
US5302902	1994-04-01	Groehl	Applicant
US5315287	1994-05-01	Sol	Applicant
US5331268	1994-07-01	Patino et al.	Applicant
US5336993	1994-08-01	Thomas et al.	Applicant
US5343380	1994-08-01	Champlin	Applicant
US5352968	1994-10-01	Reni et al.	Applicant
US5365160	1994-11-01	Leppo et al.	Applicant
US5365453	1994-11-01	Startup et al.	Applicant
US5381096	1995-01-01	Hirzel	Applicant
US5426371	1995-06-01	Salley et al.	Applicant
US5432426	1995-07-01	Yoshida	Applicant
US5434495	1995-07-01	Toko	Applicant
US5442274	1995-08-01	Tamai	Applicant
US5449996	1995-09-01	Matsumoto et al.	Applicant
US5449997	1995-09-01	Gilmore et al.	Applicant
US5451881	1995-09-01	Finger	Applicant
US5457377	1995-10-01	Jonsson	Applicant
US5469043	1995-11-01	Cherng et al.	Applicant
US5485090	1996-01-01	Stephens	Applicant
US5488300	1996-01-01	Jamieson	Applicant
US5519383	1996-05-01	De La Rosa	Applicant
US5528148	1996-06-01	Rogers	Applicant
US5546317	1996-08-01	Andrieu	Applicant
US5550485	1996-08-01	Falk	Applicant
US5561380	1996-10-01	Sway-Tin et al.	Applicant
US5562501	1996-10-01	Kinoshita et al.	Applicant
US5572136	1996-11-01	Champlin	Applicant
US5574355	1996-11-01	McShane et al.	Applicant
US5583416	1996-12-01	Klang	Applicant
US5585728	1996-12-01	Champlin	Applicant
US5589757	1996-12-01	Klang	Applicant
US5592093	1997-01-01	Klingbiel	Applicant
US5596260	1997-01-01	Moravec et al.	Applicant
US5598098	1997-01-01	Champlin	Applicant
US5602462	1997-02-01	Stich et al.	Applicant
US5606242	1997-02-01	Hull et al.	Applicant
US5621298	1997-04-01	Harvey	Applicant
US5642031	1997-06-01	Brotto	Applicant
US5650937	1997-07-01	Bounaga	Applicant
US5652501	1997-07-01	McClure et al.	Applicant
US5656920	1997-08-01	Cherng et al.	Applicant
US5675234	1997-10-01	Greene	Applicant
US5677077	1997-10-01	Faulk	Applicant
US5699050	1997-12-01	Kanazawa	Applicant
US5701089	1997-12-01	Perkins	Applicant
US5705929	1998-01-01	Caravello et al.	Applicant
US5710503	1998-01-01	Sideris et al.	Applicant
US5717336	1998-02-01	Basell et al.	Applicant
US5717937	1998-02-01	Fritz	Applicant
US5757192	1998-05-01	McShane et al.	Applicant
US5760587	1998-06-01	Harvey	Applicant
US5773978	1998-06-01	Becker	Applicant
US5789899	1998-08-01	van Phuoc etal.	Applicant
US5793359	1998-08-01	Ushikubo	Applicant
US5808469	1998-09-01	Kopera	Applicant
US5821756	1998-10-01	McShane et al.	Applicant
US5831435	1998-11-01	Troy	Applicant
US5862515	1999-01-01	Kobayashi et al.	Applicant
US5872443	1999-02-01	Williamson	Applicant
US5895440	1999-04-01	Proctor et al.	Applicant
US5914605	1999-06-01	Bertness	Applicant
US5929609	1999-07-01	Joy et al.	Applicant
US5945829	1999-08-01	Bertness	Applicant
US6002238	1999-12-01	Champlin	Applicant
US6008652	1999-12-01	Theofanopoulos et al.	Applicant
US6009369	1999-12-01	Boisvert et al.	Applicant
US6031354	2000-02-01	Wiley et al.	Applicant
US6037751	2000-03-01	Klang	Applicant
US6037777	2000-03-01	Champlin	Applicant
US6051976	2000-04-01	Bertness	Applicant
US6072299	2000-06-01	Kurie et al.	Applicant
US6072300	2000-06-01	Tsuji	Applicant
US6081098	2000-06-01	Bertness et al.	Applicant
US6091245	2000-07-01	Bertness	Applicant
US6094033	2000-07-01	Ding et al.	Applicant
US6104167	2000-08-01	Bertness et al.	Applicant
US6137269	2000-10-01	Champlin	Applicant
US6163156	2000-12-01	Bertness	Applicant
US6172483	2001-01-01	Champlin	Examiner
US6172505	2001-01-01	Bertness	Applicant
DE2926716B1	1981-01-01		Applicant
EP22450A1	1981-01-01		Applicant
EP637754A1	1995-02-01		Applicant
EP772056A1	1997-05-01		Applicant
FR2749397	1997-12-01		Applicant
GB2088159A	1982-06-01		Applicant
JP59-17894	1984-01-01		Applicant
JP59-17893	1984-01-01		Applicant
JP59-17892	1984-01-01		Applicant
JP59017894	1984-01-01		Applicant
JP59215674	1984-12-01		Applicant
JP60225078	1985-11-01		Applicant
JP62-180284	1987-08-01		Applicant
JP3282276	1991-12-01		Applicant
JP3274479	1991-12-01		Applicant
JP4131779	1992-05-01		Applicant
JP4372536	1992-12-01		Applicant
JP5216550	1993-08-01		Applicant
JP7-128414	1995-05-01		Applicant
WO93/22666	1993-11-01		Applicant
WO98/58270	1998-12-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (15)

“Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy in Battery Development and Testing”, Batteries International, Apr. 1997, pp. 59 and 62-63.Applicant
“Battery Impedance”, by E. Willihnganz et al., Electrical Engineering, Sep. 1959, pp. 922-925.Applicant
“Determining The End of Battery Life”, by S. DeBardelaben, IEEE, 1986, pp. 365-368.Applicant
“A Look at the Impedance of a Cell”, by S. Debardelaben, IEEE, 1988, pp. 394-397.Applicant
“The Impedance of Electrical Storage Cells”, by N.A. Hampson et al., Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 1980, pp. 3-11.Applicant
“A Package for Impedance/Admittance Data Analysis”, by B. Boukamp, Solid State Ionics, 1986, pp. 136-140.Applicant
“Precision of Impedance Spectroscopy Estimates of Bulk, Reaction Rate, and Diffusion Parameters”, by J. Macdonald et al., J. Electroanal, Chem., 1991, pp. 1-11.Applicant
Internal Resistance: Harbinger of Capacity Loss in Starved Electrolyte Sealed Lead Acid Batteries, by Vaccaro, F.J. et al., AT&T Bell Laboratories, 1987 IEEE, Ch. 2477, pp. 128,131.Applicant
IEEE Recomended Practice For Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Large Lead Storage Batteries for Generating Stations and Substations, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., ANSI/IEEE Std. 450-1987, Mar. 9, 1987, pp. 7-15.Applicant
“Field and Laboratory Studies to Assess the State of Health of Valve-Regulated Lead Acid Batteries: Part I Conductance/Capacity Correlation Studies”, by D. Feder et al., IEEE, Aug. 1992, pp. 218-233.Applicant
“JIS Japanese Industrial Standard-Lead Acid Batteries for Automobiles”, Japanese Standards Association UDS, 621.355.2:629.113.006, Nov. 1995.Applicant
“Performance of Dry Cells”, by C. Hambuechen, Preprint of Am. Electrochem. Soc., Apr. 18-20, 1912, paper No. 19, pp. 1-5.Applicant
“A Bridge for Measuring Storage Battery Resistance”, by E. Willihncanz, The Electrochemical Society, preprint 79-20, Apr. 1941, pp. 253-258.Applicant
U.S. application No. 09/388,501, Champlin, filed Sep. 1, 1999.Applicant
U.S. application No. 09/503,015, Champlin, filed Feb. 11, 2000.Applicant

Abstract

Description

Background of the Invention

Summary of the Invention

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0019] FIG. 1ais a simplified representation of a bridge circuit used to determine real and imaginary parts of complex self-impedance of a general element at a discrete frequency.

[0020] FIG. 1bis a simplified representation of a bridge circuit used to determine real and imaginary parts of complex self-admittance of a general element at a discrete frequency.

[0021] FIG. 2 is a simplified representation of apparatus used to determine magnitude and phase of complex self-impedance by the Lissajous' pattern method.

[0024] FIG. 5 is a simplified representation of a possible periodic voltage source for use with the apparatus of FIGS. 4, 8 and 9.

[0026] FIG. 7 is a simplified representation of a possible periodic voltage source for use with the apparatus of FIG. 6.

[0029] FIG. 10 depicts one method of modifying an active element, such as an electrochemical cell or battery, in order to approximate its self-immittance with the apparatus of FIG. 4, 6, 8, or 9.

[0030] FIG. 11 depicts another method of modifying an active element, such as an electrochemical cell or battery, in order to approximate its self-immittance with the apparatus of FIG. 4, 6, 8, or 9.

Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments

[0052] Assume the excitation to be periodic with fundamental period T. The resulting band-limited periodic voltage and current signals, v′(t) and i′(t) can each be written as finite Fourier series

\begin{matrix} v^{'} (t) = V_{0} + \sum_{k = 1}^{k_{\max}} {V_{k}^{0} \sin (2 π {kf}_{1} t) + V_{k}^{90} \cos (2 π {kf}_{1} t)} and & (1) \\ i^{'} (t) = I_{0} + \sum_{k = 1}^{k_{\max}} {I_{k}^{0} \sin (2 π {kf}_{1} t) + I_{k}^{90} \cos (2 π {kf}_{1} t)} & (2) \end{matrix}

\begin{matrix} V_{1}^{0} = \frac{2}{T} \int_{0}^{T} v^{'} (t) \sin (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (3) \\ V_{1}^{90} = \frac{2}{T} \int_{0}^{T} v^{'} (t) \cos (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (4) \\ I_{1}^{0} = \frac{2}{T} \int_{0}^{T} i^{'} (t) \sin (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (5) \\ I_{1}^{90} = \frac{2}{T} \int_{0}^{T} i^{'} (t) \cos (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (6) \end{matrix}

[0055] where the integration extends over one period of the excitation.

\begin{matrix} V_{1}^{0} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) \sin (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (7) \\ V_{1}^{90} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) \cos (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (8) \\ I_{1}^{0} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) \sin (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (9) \\ I_{1}^{90} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) \cos (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (10) \end{matrix}

[0058] Because of periodicity of the sine and cosine functions, any dc components of v′(t) and i′(t) cancel out of equations (7) through (10) and are therefore of no consequence.

\begin{matrix} G = (\frac{1}{R_{F}}) \cdot (\frac{I_{1}^{0} V_{1}^{0} + I_{1}^{90} V_{1}^{90}}{{(V_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(V_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) and & (11) \\ B = (\frac{1}{R_{F}}) \cdot (\frac{I_{1}^{90} V_{1}^{0} - I_{1}^{0} V_{1}^{90}}{{(V_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(V_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) & (12) \end{matrix}

\begin{matrix} G = (\frac{A_{V}}{R_{V} A_{I}}) \cdot (\frac{I_{1}^{0} V_{1}^{0} + I_{1}^{90} V_{1}^{90}}{{(V_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(V_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) and & (13) \\ B = (\frac{A_{V}}{R_{V} A_{I}}) \cdot (\frac{I_{1}^{90} V_{1}^{0} - I_{1}^{0} V_{1}^{90}}{{(V_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(V_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) & (14) \end{matrix}

[0063] By simply interchanging the roles of voltage and current in equations (11) through (14), the equations can be extended to find the components of complex self-impedance Z=R+jX. The results are

\begin{matrix} R = (R_{F}) \cdot (\frac{V_{1}^{0} I_{1}^{0} + V_{1}^{90} I_{1}^{90}}{{(I_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(I_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) & (15) \\ X = (R_{F}) \cdot (\frac{V_{1}^{90} I_{1}^{0} - V_{1}^{0} I_{1}^{90}}{{(I_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(I_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) & (16) \\ R = (\frac{R_{V} A_{I}}{A_{V}}) \cdot (\frac{V_{1}^{0} I_{1}^{0} + V_{1}^{90} I_{1}^{90}}{{(I_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(I_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) and & (17) \\ X = (\frac{R_{V} A_{I}}{A_{V}}) \cdot (\frac{V_{1}^{90} I_{1}^{0} - V_{1}^{0} I_{1}^{90}}{{(I_{1}^{0})}^{2} + {(I_{1}^{90})}^{2}}) & (18) \end{matrix}

[0065] M≧k_max+2 (19)

\begin{matrix} V_{1}^{0} (exact) = V_{1}^{0} (M) + \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} {V_{(nM - 1)}^{0} - V_{(nM + 1)}^{0}} & (20) \\ V_{1}^{90} (exact) = V_{1}^{90} (M) - \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} {V_{(nM - 1)}^{90} + V_{(nM + 1)}^{90}} & (21) \\ I_{1}^{0} (exact) = I_{1}^{0} (M) + \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} {I_{(nM - 1)}^{0} - I_{(nM + 1)}^{0}} & (22) \\ I_{1}^{90} (exact) = I_{1}^{90} (M) - \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} {I_{(nM - 1)}^{90} + I_{(nM + 1)}^{90}} & (23) \end{matrix}

\begin{matrix} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{NT} \int_{0}^{NT} v^{'} (t) \sin (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (24) \\ {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{NT} \int_{0}^{NT} v^{'} (t) \cos (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (25) \\ {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{NT} \int_{0}^{NT} i^{'} (t) \sin (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (26) \\ {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{NT} \int_{0}^{NT} i^{'} (t) \cos (2 π f_{1} t) ⅆ t & (27) \end{matrix}

[0070] Note that averaging the Fourier coefficients over N periods effectively extends the interval of correlation of the correlation integrals to NT.

\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} = ⟨ v^{'} (0) \sin (0) + v^{'} (\frac{T}{M}) \sin (\frac{2 π}{M}) + \\ {v^{'} (\frac{2 T}{M}) \sin (\frac{4 π}{M}) + \dots ⟩}_{av} \\ = {⟨ v^{'} (0) ⟩}_{av} \sin (0) + {⟨ v^{'} (\frac{T}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \sin (\frac{2 π}{M}) + \\ {⟨ v^{'} (\frac{2 T}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \sin (\frac{4 π}{M}) + \dots \end{matrix} & (28) \end{matrix}

\begin{matrix} {⟨ v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{p = 0}^{(N - 1)} v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M} + pT) & (29) \\ {⟨ i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{p = 0}^{(N - 1)} i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M} + pT) & (30) \end{matrix}

[0073] Applying the trapezoidal rule to these averages leads to

\begin{matrix} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {{⟨ v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \sin (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (31) \\ {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {{⟨ v^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \cos (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (32) \\ {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {{⟨ i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \sin (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (33) \\ {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} = \frac{2}{M} \sum_{n = 0}^{(M - 1)} {{⟨ i^{'} (\frac{nT}{M}) ⟩}_{av} \cos (\frac{2 π n}{M})} & (34) \end{matrix}

\begin{matrix} G = (\frac{1}{R_{F}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) and & (35) \\ B = (\frac{1}{R_{F}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} - {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) & (36) \end{matrix}

[0075] while for the embodiments of FIGS. 8 and 9

\begin{matrix} G = (\frac{A_{V}}{R_{V} A_{I}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) and & (37) \\ B = (\frac{A_{V}}{R_{V} A_{I}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} - {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) & (38) \end{matrix}

[0076] Interchanging the roles of voltage and current in equations (35) through (38) to determine the components of complex self-impedance Z=R+jX leads to

\begin{matrix} R = (R_{F}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) & (39) \\ X = (R_{F}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} - {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) & (40) \\ R = (\frac{R_{V} A_{I}}{A_{V}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} + {⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) and & (41) \\ X = (\frac{R_{V} A_{I}}{A_{V}}) \cdot (\frac{{⟨ V_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} - {⟨ V_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av} {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}}{{⟨ I_{1}^{0} ⟩}_{av}^{2} + {⟨ I_{1}^{90} ⟩}_{av}^{2}}) & (42) \end{matrix}