US 5,834,384 AGrant

Nonwoven Webs With One or More Surface Treatments

Issue Date:1998-11-10

•28 Claims

Abstract

A nonwoven web having improved particulate barrier properties is provided. A surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV direct current is present on the nonwoven web. The particulate barrier properties are improved by subjecting said surface treatment treated nonwoven web to corona discharge.

Metadata

Assignee

Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.

Inventors

Bernard Cohen
Lamar Heath Gipson
Joel Brostin

Application Information

Application Number:US 5638119

Filing Date:1995-11-28

Priority Date:1995-11-28

Art Unit:171

Classifications

IPC:

B32B 506

Field of Search:

42744255156538381;382;384;392;414;41597;367;374;381;528272.6

Patent Drawings

This patent does not have any drawings.

Description

Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to fabrics useful for forming protective garments. More particularly, the present invention relates to nonwoven webs and surface coatings for such nonwoven webs.

Background of the Invention

There are many types of limited use or disposable protective garments designed to provide barrier properties. Protective garments should be resistant to penetration by both liquids and/or particles. For a variety of reasons, it is undesirable for liquids and pathogens which may be carried by liquids to pass through the garment to contact persons working in an environment where pathogens are present.

Similarly, it is highly desirable to isolate persons from harmful substances which may be present in a work place or accident site. To increase the likelihood that the protective garment is correctly worn thereby reducing the chance of exposure, workers would benefit from wearing a protective garment that is relatively impervious to liquids and/or particles and durable but which is still comfortable so it does not reduce the worker's performance. After use, it is usually quite costly to decontaminate a protective garment that has been exposed to a harmful or hazardous substance. Thus, it is important that a protective garment be cost effective so as to be disposable.

One type of protective garment is disposable protective coveralls. Coveralls can be used to effectively isolate a wearer from a harmful environment in ways that open or cloak style protective garments such as drapes, gowns and the like are unable to do. Accordingly, coveralls have many applications where isolation of a wearer is desirable.

Disposable protective garments also include disposable surgical garments such as disposable surgical gowns and drapes. As is generally known, surgical gowns and drapes are designed to greatly reduce, if not prevent, the transmission through the surgical garment of liquids and biological contaminates which may become entrained therein. In surgical procedure environments, such liquid sources include the gown wearer's perspiration, patient liquids such as blood, saliva, perspiration and life support liquids such as plasma and saline.

Many surgical garments were originally made of cotton or linen and were sterilized prior to their use in the operating room. These surgical garments, however, permitted transmission therethrough or "strike-through" of many of the liquids encountered in surgical procedures. These surgical garments were undesirable, if not unsatisfactory, because such "strike through" established a direct path for transmission of bacteria and other contaminates to and from the wearer of the surgical garment. Furthermore, the garments were costly, and, of course, laundering and sterilization procedures were required before reuse.

Disposable surgical garments have largely replaced linen surgical gowns. Because many surgical procedures require generally a high degree of liquid repellency to prevent strike-through, disposable surgical garments for use under these conditions are, for the most part, made entirely from liquid repellent fabrics.

Therefore, generally speaking, it is desirable that disposable protective garments be made from fabrics that are relatively impervious to liquids and/or particulates. These barrier-type fabrics must also be suited for the manufacture of protective apparel at such low cost that make discarding the garments after only a single use economical.

Examples of disposable protective garments which are generally manufactured from nonwoven web laminates in order to assure that they are cost effectively disposable are coveralls, surgical gowns and surgical drapes sold by the Kimberly-Clark Corporation. Many of the disposable protective garments sold by Kimberly-Clark Corporation are manufactured from a three layer nonwoven web laminate. The two outer layers are formed from spunbonded polypropylene-based fibers and the inner layer is formed from meltblown polypropylene-based fibers. The outer layers of spunbonded fibers provide tough, durable and abrasion resistant surfaces. The inner layer is not only water repellent but acts as a breathable filter barrier allowing air and moisture vapor to pass through the bulk of the fabric while filtering out many harmful particles.

In some instances, the material forming protective garments may include a film layer or a film laminate. While forming protective garments from a film may improve particle barrier properties of the protective garment, such film or film-laminated materials may also inhibit or prevent the passage of air and moisture vapor therethrough. Generally, protective garments formed from materials which do not allow sufficient passage of air and moisture vapor therethrough become uncomfortable to wear correctly for extended periods of time.

Thus, while in some instances, film or film-laminated materials may provide improved particulate barrier properties as compared to nonwoven-laminated fabrics, nonwoven-laminated fabrics generally provide greater wearer comfort. Therefore, a need exists for inexpensive disposable protective garments, and, more particularly, inexpensive disposable protective garments formed from a nonwoven fabric which provide improved particulate barrier properties while also being breathable and thus comfortable to wear correctly for extended periods of time.

Summary of the Invention

The present invention provides a nonwoven web having improved particulate barrier properties. In one embodiment, the nonwoven web may include at least one layer formed from fibers subjected to corona discharge. The fibers subjected to corona discharge may include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 thousand volts (KV) of direct current (DC) and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The nonwoven web may also include fibers formed from a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene. Desirably, the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend. Another surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC may be present on the fibers subjected to corona discharge or on fibers not subjected to corona discharge or both.

In another embodiment, the nonwoven web may include at least one layer formed from spunbonded fibers and at least one layer formed from meltblown fibers. The fibers of at least one of the layers may be subjected to corona discharge and include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV DC, and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The nonwoven web may also include fibers formed from a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene. Desirably, the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend. Another surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC may be present on the fibers subjected to corona discharge or on fibers not subjected to corona discharge or both.

In another embodiment, the nonwoven web may include at least two layers formed from spunbonded fibers and at least one layer formed from meltblown fibers. The layer formed from meltblown fibers is positioned between the two layers formed from spunbonded fibers. The fibers of at least one of the layers may be subjected to corona discharge and include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV DC, and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The nonwoven web may also include fibers formed from a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene. Desirably, the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend. Another surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC may be present on the fibers subjected to corona discharge or on fibers not subjected to corona discharge or both.

In another embodiment, the nonwoven web may include at least two layers formed from spunbonded fibers and at least one layer formed from meltblown fibers wherein the layer formed from meltblown fibers is between the two layers formed from spunbonded fibers, and wherein the fibers forming at least one of the layers are subjected to corona discharge. At least one of the layers formed from spunbonded fibers may include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV DC, and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The layer formed from meltblown fibers includes a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV DC, and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The meltblown layer may further be formed from fibers which are formed from a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene, and more particularly, the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend. Another surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC may be present on the fibers subjected to corona discharge or on fibers not subjected to corona discharge or both.

In another embodiment, the nonwoven web includes at least two layers formed from spunbonded fibers and at least one layer formed from meltblown fibers wherein the layer formed from meltblown fibers is between the two layers formed from spunbonded fibers. The fibers forming at least one of the layers includes a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater 13 KV DC, and wherein fibers forming another layer includes another surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC. Each layer formed from fibers which includes a surface treatment is subjected to corona discharge. The spunbonded fibers of one of the layers may include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV DC, and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The spunbonded fibers of another layer may also include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC. The layer formed from meltblown fibers may include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage either no greater than 13 KV DC or greater than 13 KV DC or both.

Detailed Description of the Invention

As used herein, the term "dielectric" means, according to McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology, 7th Edition, Copyright 1992, a material, such as a polymer, which is an electrical insulator or which an electric field can be sustained with a minimum dissipation of power. A solid material is a dielectric if its valence band is full and is separated from the conduction band by at least 3 eV.

As used herein, the term "breakdown voltage" means that voltage at which electric failure occurs when a potential difference is applied to an electrically insulating material. The breakdown voltage reported for the various materials tested was determined by the ASTM test method for dielectric breakdown voltage (D 877-87).

As used herein, the term "electret" means a dielectric body possessing permanent or semipermanent electric poles of opposite sign.

As used herein, the term "surface treatment" means a material, for example a surfactant, which is present on the surface of another material, for example a shaped polymer such as a nonwoven. The surface treatment may be topically applied to the shaped polymer or may be added to a molten or semi-molten polymer. Methods of topical application include, for example, spraying, dipping or otherwise coating the shaped polymer with the surface treatment. Surface treatments which are added to a molten or semi-molten polymer may be referred to as "internal additives". Internal additives suitable for use in the present invention are generally non-toxic and have a low volatility. Desirably, these internal additives should be thermally stable at temperatures up to 300.degree. C., and sufficiently soluble in the molten or semi-molten polymer and should also sufficiently phase separate such that the additive migrates from the bulk of the shaped polymer towards a surface thereof as the shaped polymer cools.

As used herein, the terms "necking", "neck stretching" or "necked stretched" interchangeably refer to a method of elongating a fabric, generally in the machine direction, to reduce its width in a controlled manner to a desired amount. The controlled stretching may take place under cool, room temperature or greater temperatures and is limited to an increase in overall dimension in the direction being stretched up to the elongation required to break the fabric, which in many cases is about 1.2 to 1.4 times the original unstretched dimension. When relaxed, the web retracts toward its original dimensions. Such a process is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,443,513 to Meitner and Notheis and in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,965,122, 5,226,992 and 5,336,545 to Morman which are all herein incorporated by reference.

As used herein the terms "neck softening" or "necked softened" mean neck stretching carried out without the addition of heat to the material as it is stretched, i.e., at ambient temperature. In neck stretching or softening, a fabric is referred to, for example, as being stretched by 20%.

As used herein, the term "nonwoven web" refers to a web that has a structure of individual fibers or filaments which are interlaid, but not in an identifiable repeating manner.

As used herein the term "spunbonded fibers" refers to fibers which are formed by extruding molten thermoplastic material as filaments from a plurality of fine, usually circular capillaries of a spinnerette with the diameter of the extruded filaments then being rapidly reduced as by, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,340,563 to Appel et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 3,692,618 to Dorschner et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,802,817 to Matsuki et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,338,992 and 3,341,394 to Kinney, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,502,763 and 3,909,009 to Levy, and U.S. Pat. No. 3,542,615 to Dobo et al which are all herein incorporated by reference. Spunbonded fibers are generally continuous and in some instances have an average diameter larger than 7 microns.

As used herein the term "meltblown fibers" means fibers formed by extruding a molten thermoplastic material through a plurality of fine, usually circular, die capillaries as molten threads or filaments into a high velocity, usually heated gas (e.g. air) stream which attenuates the filaments of molten thermoplastic material to reduce their diameter. Thereafter, the meltblown fibers are carried by the high velocity gas stream and are deposited on a collecting surface to form a web of randomly disbursed meltblown fibers. Meltblowing is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,849,241 to Buntin, U.S. Pat. No. 4,307,143 to Meitner et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 4,707,398 to Wisneski et al which are all herein incorporated by reference. In some instances, meltblown fibers may generally have an average diameter smaller than 10 microns.

Polymers, and particularly polyolefins polymers, are well suited for the formation of fibers or filaments used in forming nonwoven webs which are useful in the practice of the present invention. Nonwoven webs can be made from a variety of processes including, but not limited to, air laying processes, wet laid processes, hydroentangling processes, spunbonding, meltblowing, staple fiber carding and bonding, and solution spinning.

The present invention provides a nonwoven web which may include at least one layer formed from fibers subjected to corona discharge. The nonwoven web may be formed from meltblown fibers or spunbonded fibers or both. The fibers subjected to corona discharge may include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 thousand volts or 13 kilovolts (KV) of direct current (DC) and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The nonwoven web may also include fibers formed from a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene. Desirably, the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend. Another surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC may be present on the fibers subjected to corona discharge or on fibers not subjected to corona discharge or both.

In another embodiment, the nonwoven web may include at least one layer formed from spunbonded fibers and at least one layer formed from meltblown fibers. The fibers of at least one of the layers, and desirably the layer formed from meltblown fibers, may be subjected to corona discharge and include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV DC, and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The nonwoven web may also include fibers, and desirably the meltblown fibers, formed from a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene. Desirably, the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend. Another surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC may be present on the fibers subjected to corona discharge or on fibers not subjected to corona discharge or both.

In another embodiment, the nonwoven web may include at least two layers formed from spunbonded fibers and at least one layer formed from meltblown fibers. The layer formed from meltblown fibers may be positioned between the two layers formed from spunbonded fibers. The fibers of at least one of the layers, and desirably the layer formed from meltblown fibers, may be subjected to corona discharge and include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV DC, and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The nonwoven web may also include fibers, and desirably meltblown fibers, formed from a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene. Desirably, the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend. Another surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC may be present on the fibers subjected to corona discharge or on fibers not subjected to corona discharge or both.

In another embodiment, the nonwoven web may include at least two layers formed from spunbonded fibers and at least one layer formed from meltblown fibers wherein the layer formed from meltblown fibers may be positioned between the two layers formed from spunbonded fibers, and wherein the fibers forming at least one of the layers are subjected to corona discharge. At least one of the layers formed from spunbonded fibers may include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV DC, and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The layer formed from meltblown fibers includes a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV DC, and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The meltblown layer may further be formed from fibers which are formed from a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene, and more particularly, the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend. Another surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC may be present on the fibers subjected to corona discharge or on fibers not subjected to corona discharge or both.

In another embodiment, the nonwoven web includes at least two layers formed from spunbonded fibers and at least one layer formed from meltblown fibers wherein the layer formed from meltblown fibers may be positioned between the two layers formed from spunbonded fibers. The fibers forming at least one of the layers includes a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater 13 KV DC, and wherein fibers forming another layer includes another surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC. Each layer formed from fibers which includes a surface treatment is subjected to corona discharge. The spunbonded fibers of one of the layers may include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV DC, and desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 8 KV DC and more desirably a breakdown voltage no greater than 5 KV DC and most desirably a breakdown voltage of between 1 KV DC and 5 KV DC. The spunbonded fibers of the other layer may include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV DC. The layer formed from meltblown fibers may include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage either no greater than 13 KV DC or greater than 13 KV DC or both.

As described in greater detail below, the entire thickness of the nonwoven web laminate may be subjected to corona discharge. Alternatively, individual nonwoven layers which, when combined, form the nonwoven web laminate may be separately subjected to corona discharge. When the entire thickness of the nonwoven web laminate is subjected to corona discharge, the fibers forming at least one of the nonwoven layers are desirably formed from a variety of dielectric polymers including, but not limited to, polyesters, polyolefins, nylon and copolymer of these materials. The fibers forming the other nonwoven layers may be formed from a variety of non-dielectric polymers, including, but not limited to, cellulose, glass, wool and protein polymers.

When one or more individual nonwoven layers are separately subjected to corona discharge, the fibers forming these nonwoven layers are desirably formed from the above described dielectric polymers. Those individual nonwoven layers which are not subjected to corona discharge may be formed from the above described non-dielectric polymers.

It has been found that nonwoven webs formed from thermoplastic based fibers and particularly polyolefin-based fibers are particularly well-suited for the above applications. Examples of such fibers include spunbonded fibers and meltblown fibers. Examples of such nonwoven webs formed from such fibers are the polypropylene nonwoven webs produced by the Assignee of record, Kimberly-Clark Corporation.

As previously described above, one embodiment of the present invention may include a nonwoven web laminate. For example, the nonwoven web laminate may include at least one layer formed from spunbonded fibers and another layer formed from meltblown fibers, such as a spunbonded/meltblown (S/M) nonwoven web laminate. In another embodiment, the nonwoven web laminate may include at least one layer formed from meltblown fibers which is positioned between two layers formed from spunbonded fibers, such as a spunbonded/meltblown/spunbonded (S/M/S) nonwoven web laminate. Examples of these nonwoven web laminates are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,041,203 to Brock et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,169,706 to Collier, et al, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,374,888 to Bornslaeger which are all herein incorporated by reference. More particularly, the spunbonded fibers may be formed from polypropylene. Suitable polypropylenes for the spunbonded layers are commercially available as PD-9355 from the Exxon Chemical Company of Baytown, Tex.

More particularly, the meltblown fibers may be formed from polyolefin polymers, and more particularly a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene. Examples of such meltblown fibers are contained in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,165,979 and 5,204,174 which are incorporated herein by reference. Still more particularly, the meltblown fibers may be formed from a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene wherein the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 weight percent of the blend. One such suitable polypropylene is designated 3746-G from the Exxon Chemical Co., Baytown, Tex. One such suitable polybutylene is available as DP-8911 from the Shell Chemical Company of Houston, Tex. The meltblown fibers may also contain a polypropylene modified according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,213,881 which is incorporated herein by reference.

The S/M/S nonwoven web laminate may be made by sequentially depositing onto a moving forming belt first a spunbonded fabric layer, then a meltblown fabric layer on top to the first spunbonded fabric and last another spunbonded fabric layer on top of the meltblown fabric layer and then bonding the laminate in a manner described below. Alternatively, the layers may be made individually, collected in rolls, and combined in a separate bonding step. Such S/M/S nonwoven web laminates usually have an average basis weight of from about 0.1 to 12 ounces per square yard (osy) (3 to 400 grams per square meter (gsm)), or more particularly from about 0.75 to about 5 osy (25 to 170 gsm) and still more particularly from about 0.75 to about 3 osy (25 to 100 gsm).

Methods of subjecting nonwoven webs to corona discharge, are well known by those skilled in the art. Briefly, corona discharge is achieved by the application of sufficient direct current (DC) voltage to an electric field initiating structure (EFIS) in the proximity of an electric field receiving structure (EFRS). The voltage should be sufficiently high such that ions are generated at the EFIS and flow from the EFIS to the EFRS. Both the EFIS and the EFRS are desirably formed from conductive materials. Suitable conductive materials include copper, tungsten, stainless steel and aluminum.

One particular technique of subjecting nonwoven webs to corona discharge is the technique disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,401,446 which is assigned to the University of Tennessee, and is herein incorporated by reference. This technique involves subjecting the nonwoven web to a pair of electrical fields wherein the electrical fields have opposite polarities. Each electrical field forms a corona discharge.

In those instances where the nonwoven web is a nonwoven web laminate, the entire thickness of the nonwoven web laminate may be subjected to corona discharge. In other instances, one or more of the individual layers which form the nonwoven web laminate or the fibers forming such individual layers may be separately subjected to corona discharge and then combined with other layers in a juxtaposed relationship to form the nonwoven web laminate. In some instances, the electric charge on the surface of the nonwoven web laminate prior to corona discharge may be substantially the same as the electric charge on the surface of the corona discharge treated web. In other words, the surface of the nonwoven web laminate may not generally exhibit a higher electric charge after subjecting the web to corona discharge than the electric charge present on the surface of the web before subjecting it to corona discharge.

Nonwoven web laminates may be generally bonded in some manner as they are produced in order to give them sufficient structural integrity to withstand the rigors of further processing into a finished product. Bonding can be accomplished in a number of ways such as hydroentanglement, needling, ultrasonic bonding, adhesive bonding and thermal bonding.

Ultrasonic bonding is performed, for example, by passing the nonwoven web laminate between a sonic horn and anvil roll as illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,374,888 to Bornslaeger.

Thermal bonding of a nonwoven web laminate may be accomplished by passing the same between the rolls of a calendering machine. At least one of the rollers of the calender is heated and at least one of the rollers, not necessarily the same one as the heated one, has a pattern which is imprinted upon the laminate as it passes between the rollers. As the fabric passes between the rollers it is subjected to pressure as well as heat. The combination of heat and pressure applied in a particular pattern results in the creation of fused bond areas in the nonwoven web laminate where the bonds thereon correspond to the pattern of bond points on the calender roll.

Various patterns for calender rolls have been developed. One example is the Hansen-Pennings pattern with between about 10 to 25% bond area with about 100 to 500 bonds/square inch as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,855,046 to Hansen and Pennings. Another common pattern is a diamond pattern with repeating and slightly offset diamonds.

The exact calender temperature and pressure for bonding the nonwoven web laminate depend on the thermoplastic(s) from which the nonwoven web is made. Generally for nonwoven web laminates formed from polyolefins, desirable temperatures are between 150.degree. and 350.degree. F. (66.degree. and 177.degree. C.) and the pressure is between 300 and 1000 pounds per linear inch. More particularly, for polypropylene, the desirable temperatures are between 270.degree. and 320.degree. F. (132.degree. and 160.degree. C.) and the pressure is between 400 and 800 pounds per linear inch.

In those instances where the nonwoven web is used in or around flammable materials and static discharge is a concern, the nonwoven web may be treated with any number of antistatic materials. In these instances, the antistatic material may be applied to the nonwoven by any number of techniques including, but not limited, to dipping the nonwoven into a solution containing the antistatic material or by spraying the nonwoven with a solution containing the antistatic material. In some instances the antistatic material may be applied to both the external surfaces of the nonwoven and/or the bulk of the nonwoven. In other instances, the antistatic material may be applied to portions of the nonwoven, such as a selected surface or surfaces thereof.

Of particular usefulness is the antistat or antistatic material known as ZELEC.RTM., an alcohol phosphate salt product of the Du Pont Corporation. The nonwoven web may be treated with the antistatic material either before or after subjecting the web to charging. Furthermore, some or all of the material layers may be treated with the antistatic material. In those instances where only some of the material layers are treated with antistatic material, the non-treated layer or layers may be subjected to charging prior to or after combining with the antistatic treated layer or layers.

Additionally, in those instances where the nonwoven web is used around alcohol, the nonwoven web may be treated with an alcohol repellent material. In these instances, the alcohol repellent material may be applied to the nonwoven by any number of techniques including, but not limited to, dipping or by spraying the nonwoven web with a solution containing the alcohol repellent material. In some instances the alcohol repellent material may be applied to both the external surfaces of the nonwoven and the bulk of the nonwoven. In other instances, the alcohol repellent material may be applied to portions of the nonwoven, such as a selected surface or surfaces thereof.

Of particular usefulness are the alcohol repellent materials formed from fluorinated urethane derivatives, an example of which includes FX-1801. FX-1801, formerly called L-10307, is available from the 3M Company of St. Paul, Minn. FX-1801 has a melting point of about 130.degree. to 138.degree. C. FX-1801 may be added to either the spunbonded and/or meltblown layer at an amount of about 0.1 to about 2.0 weight percent or more particularly between about 0.25 and 1.0 weight percent. FX-1801 may be topically applied or may be internally applied by adding the FX-1801 to the fiber forming polymer prior to fiber formation.

Generally, internal additives, such as the alcohol repellent additive FX-1801, suitable for use in the present invention should be non-toxic and have a low volatility. Additionally, the internal additive should be thermally stable at temperatures up to 300.degree. C., and sufficiently soluble in the molten or semi-molten fiber forming polymer. The internal additive should also sufficiently phase separate such that the additive migrates from the bulk of the polymer fiber towards the surface of the polymer fiber as the fiber cools without requiring the addition of heat. The layers of the fabric of the present invention may also contain fire retardants for increased resistance to fire, pigments to give each layer the same or distinct colors, and/or chemicals such as hindered amines to provide enhanced ultraviolet light resistance. Fire retardants and pigments for spunbonded and meltblown thermoplastic polymers are known in the art and may be internal additives. A pigment, if used, is generally present in an amount less than 5 weight percent of the layer.

Examples

To demonstrate the attributes of the present invention, several surface treatments were combined with nonwoven webs of various average basis weights and polymer blends as listed in TABLE I.

For samples 1-3, 5, 6, 9 and 10, the respective surface treatments were applied to a meltblown nonwoven web having an average basis weight of about 1.5 ounce per square yard (osy). These webs were made from Himont PF105 polypropylene.

For sample 4 and a portion of the nonwoven webs utilized in sample 7, the respective surface treatments were applied to a S/M/S laminate having an average basis weight of about 1.6 osy. These samples included a meltblown layer having an average basis weight of about 0.5 osy between two layers of spunbonded material, each spunbonded layer having an average basis weight of about 0.55 osy. The spunbonded layers were made from polypropylene copolymer designated PD-9355 by Exxon chemical Co. The meltblown layer was made from polypropylene designated 3746G from Exxon Chemical and polybutylene (10 weight percent) designated DP-8911 from Shell. The samples were necked softened by 8 percent at ambient temperature. The ZELEC surface treatment was present on one of the spunbonded surfaces in an amount of around 0.03% by weight of the spunbonded layer. Present in the meltblown layer of each of the above samples was FX 1801.

For the remaining portion of the nonwoven webs utilized in sample 7, the ZELEC surface treatment was applied to a S/M/S laminate having an average basis weight of about 2.2 osy. Both spunbonded layers had an average basis weight of around 0.85 osy and the meltblown layer had an average basis weight of around 0.5 osy. One of the spunbonded layers of this sample contained about 0.03% by weight of the spunbonded layer of ZELEC surface treatment.

For sample 8, the respective surface treatment was applied to a 1.8 osy S/M/S laminate. The spunbonded layers were formed from polypropylene resins--Exxon PD-3445 and Himont PF-301. White and dark blue pigments, Ampacet 41438 (Ampacet Inc., N.Y.) and SCC 4402 (Standrige Color Inc., GA.), respectively, were added to the polypropylene resins forming one of the spunbonded layers. The other spunbonded layer was formed from these polypropylene resins without pigments. The meltblown layer was formed from the polypropylene resin Himont PF-015 without pigments.

The meltblown layer had an average basis weight of about 0.45 osy and each spunbonded layer had an average basis weight of about 0.675 osy. The 2.95% FC808 solution was prepared by adding 0.5% hexanol, 2.95% FC808 and about 96.5% water. The FC808 solution was applied to one of the spunbonded layers. FC808 is an alcohol repellent surface treatment formed from a polymeric fluoroaliphatic ester (20%), water (80%) and traces of ethyl acetate (400 parts/million).

A portion of each of the surface treatment treated nonwoven webs described in TABLE 1, (samples 1-10) was removed and not subjected to corona discharge. The remainder of each of the surface treatment treated nonwoven web samples (1-10) was subjected to corona discharge. The corona discharge was produced by using a Model No. P/N 25A--120volt, 50/60 Hz reversible polarity power unit (Simco Corp., Hatfield, Pa.), which was connected to the EFIS, and a Model No. P16V 120V,.25A 50/60 Hz power unit (Simco Corp., Hatfield, Pa.) which was connected to the EFRS. The EFIS was a RC-3 Charge Master charge bar (Simco. Corp.) and the EFRS was a solid, three inch diameter, aluminum roller. The corona discharge environment was generally about 71.degree. F. and 53% relative humidity. As described in the above U.S. Pat. No. 5,401,446, two sets of EFIS/EFRS are used. The voltage applied to the first set of EFIS/EFRS was 15 KV DC/0.0 KV DC, respectively. The voltage applied to the second set of EFIS/EFRS was 25 KV DC/7.5 KV DC, respectively. The gap between the EFIS and the EFRS for each set was one inch.

The filtration efficiency for both corona treated and non-corona treated nonwoven web samples was analyzed. The particulate filtration test used to evaluate the particulate filtration properties of these nonwovens is generally known as the NaCl Filter Efficiency Test (hereinafter the "NaCl Test"). The NaCl Test was conducted on an automated filter tester, Certitest.TM. Model #8110, which is available from TSI Inc., St. Paul, Minn. The particulate filtration efficiency of the test fabric is reported as "% penetration". "% penetration" is calculated by the following formula--100.times.(downstream particles/upstream particles). The upstream particles represent the total quantity of approximately 0.1 .mu.m NaCl aerosol particles which are introduced into the tester. The downstream particles are those particles which have been introduced into the tester and which have passed through the bulk of the test fabric. Therefore, the "% penetration" value reported in TABLES I-V is a percentage of the total quantity of particles introduced into a controlled air flow within the tester which pass through the bulk of the test fabric. The size of the test fabric was 4.5" in diameter. The air flow may be constant or varied. At about 32 liters per minute of air flow, a pressure differential of between 4 and 5 mm Water Gage develops between the atmosphere on the upstream side of the test fabric as compared to the atmosphere on the down stream side of the test fabric. The filtration efficiency results for samples 1-6 and 8-10 are reported in TABLE 2. The filtration efficiency results for sample 7, the ZELEC surface treatment treated nonwovens webs, are not reported in TABLE 2.

In view of TABLE 2, it was concluded that in those instances where there existed a substantial increase in filtration efficiency of the surface treatment treated nonwoven web between the non-corona treated and the corona treated, the corona treated nonwoven web had formed an electret.

Based upon the filtration efficiency results reported in TABLE 2, four liquid surface treatments were selected for breakdown voltage analysis. The filtration efficiency data for two of the liquid surface treatments, Y 12488 and TEGOPREN 5830, indicated generally an insubstantial difference in filtration efficiency between corona and non-corona treatment. The filtration efficiency data for the other two liquid surface treatments, TRITON 102 and SF19, indicated generally a substantial improvement in the filtration efficiency between corona and non-corona treatment.

The breakdown voltages for these liquid surface treatments are reported in TABLE 3. The breakdown voltage for each liquid surface treatment was determined by using a Hipot Tester, model no. Hipotronics 100, having a range of 0-25 KV DC and an accuracy of +/-2%. The electrodes were one inch diameter brass electrodes spaced 0.100 inches apart. The electrodes were submersed in a neat quantity of the respective liquid surface treatments. The voltage to the electrodes was increased from 0 KV DC at an approximate rate of 3 KV DC/second until breakdown occurred. The electrodes and the test vessel were thoroughly washed, rinsed with distilled water, and air dried before testing the next surface treatment.

For two of the liquid surface treatments, Y 12488 and TEGOPREN 5830, which indicated generally an insubstantial difference in filtration efficiency between corona and non-corona treatment, the breakdown voltages were 24 KV DC and 15 KV DC, respectively. For the two liquid surface treatments, TRITON 102 and SF19, which indicated generally a substantial improvement in the filtration efficiency between corona and non-corona treatment, the breakdown voltages were 1.8 KV DC and 4.8 KV DC, respectively.

While the invention has been described in detail with respect to specific embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art, upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing, may readily conceive of alterations to, variations of and equivalents to these embodiments. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be assessed as that of the appended claims and any equivalents thereto.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A nonwoven electret comprising: at least one layer of fibers, wherein the fibers have been subjected to corona discharge and include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV of direct current.

2. The nonwoven electret of claim 1, wherein the fibers comprise a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene.

3. The nonwoven electret of claim 1, wherein the breakdown voltage of the surface treatment is less than 8 KV of direct current.

4. The nonwoven electret of claim 2, wherein the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend.

5. A nonwoven electret comprising: at least two layers of spunbonded fibers and at least one layer of meltblown fibers, wherein the layer of meltblown fibers is between the two layers of spunbonded fibers, wherein fibers of at least one layer have been subjected to corona discharge; and wherein the fibers which have been subjected to corona discharge include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV of direct current.

6. The nonwoven electret of claim 5, wherein the meltblown fibers comprise a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene.

7. The nonwoven electret of claim 6 wherein the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend.

8. The nonwoven electret of claim 5 wherein the average basis weight of the nonwoven web is about 1.8 ounces per square yard.

9. The nonwoven electret of claim 5, wherein the meltblown fibers have been subjected to corona discharge.

10. A nonwoven electret comprising: at least two layers of spunbonded fibers and at least one layer of meltblown fibers, wherein the layer of meltblown fibers is between the two layers of spunbonded fibers, wherein the fibers forming at least one layer have been subjected to corona discharge; and wherein at least one layer of spunbonded fibers includes a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV of direct current and wherein the layer of meltblown fibers includes a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV of direct current.

11. The nonwoven electret of claim 10, wherein the meltblown fibers comprise a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene.

12. The nonwoven electret of claim 11, wherein the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend.

13. The nonwoven electret of claim 10, wherein the breakdown voltage of the surface treatment of the spunbonded fibers is less than 8 KV of direct current.

14. The nonwoven electret of claim 10, where the breakdown voltage of the surface treatment of the meltblown fibers is less than 8 KV of direct current.

15. The nonwoven electret of claim 10, wherein the meltblown fibers have been subjected to corona discharge.

16. A nonwoven web comprising: at least two layers of spunbonded fibers and at least one layer of meltblown fibers, wherein the layer of meltblown fibers is between the two layers of spunbonded fibers, wherein fibers of at least one layer include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV of direct current, and wherein fibers of at least one layer include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV of direct current; and wherein each layer of fibers having a surface treatment has been subjected to corona discharge.

17. The nonwoven web of claim 16, wherein the spunbonded fibers of one of the layers include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV direct current, and wherein the spunbonded fibers of another layer include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV direct current.

18. The nonwoven web of claim 16, wherein the meltblown fibers include at least one of said surface treatments.

19. A nonwoven web comprising: at least one layer of fibers which has been subjected to corona discharge, wherein the fibers include a first surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV of direct current, and wherein the fibers include a second surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV of direct current.

20. The nonwoven web of claim 19, wherein the fibers comprise a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene.

21. The nonwoven web of claim 20, wherein the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend.

22. The nonwoven web of claim 19 wherein the breakdown voltage of the first surface treatment is less than 8 KV of direct current.

23. The nonwoven web of claim 19, wherein the breakdown voltage of the second surface treatment is less than 8 KV of direct current.

24. A nonwoven web comprising: at least two layers of spunbonded fibers and at least one layer of meltblown fibers, wherein the layer of meltblown fibers is between the two layers of spunbonded fibers, at least one layer of fibers having been subjected to corona discharge, wherein at least one layer of fibers includes a first surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13 KV of direct current, and wherein the at least one layer of fibers include a second surface treatment having a breakdown voltage greater than 13 KV of direct current.

25. The nonwoven web of claim 24 wherein at least one of the fibers which include a surface treatment having a breakdown voltage no greater than 13KV has been subjected to corona discharge.

26. The nonwoven web of claim 24 wherein the meltblown fibers comprise a blend of polypropylene and polybutylene.

27. The nonwoven web of claim 26 wherein the polybutylene is present in the blend in a range from 0.5 to 20 percent weight of the blend.

28. The nonwoven web of claim 24 wherein the breakdown voltage of the surface treatment of the spunbonded fibers is less than 8 KV of direct current.

Patent Citations (263)

Patent	Date	Inventor
USRe30782	1981-10-01	van Turnhout
USRe31285	1983-06-01	van Turnhout et al.
USRe32171	1986-06-01	van Turnhout
US668791	1901-02-01	Blake et al.
US813063	1906-02-01	Sutton et al.
US859998	1907-07-01	Wentworth
US924032	1909-06-01	Blake et al.
US1222305	1917-04-01	Kraus
US1297159	1919-03-01	Hedberg
US1355477	1920-10-01	Howell
US2106865	1938-02-01	Bantz et al.
US2217444	1940-10-01	Hill
US2328577	1943-09-01	Oglesby
US2378067	1945-03-01	Cook, Jr.
US2398792	1946-04-01	Johnson
US2748018	1956-05-01	Miller
US2998051	1961-08-01	Sittel
US3012668	1961-12-01	Fraas
US3059772	1962-10-01	Baron
US3125547	1964-03-01	Blatz
US3281347	1966-10-01	Winder
US3323933	1967-06-01	Barford et al.
US3338992	1967-08-01	Kinney
US3341007	1967-09-01	Mayer et al.
US3341394	1967-09-01	Kinney
US3380584	1968-04-01	Fulwyler
US3402814	1968-09-01	Morel et al.
US3436797	1969-04-01	Graf et al.
US3502763	1970-03-01	Hartman
US3542615	1970-11-01	Dobo et al.
US3581886	1971-06-01	Singewald et al.
US3692606	1972-09-01	Miller et al.
US3692618	1972-09-01	Dorschner et al.
US3802817	1974-04-01	Matsuki et al.
US3821021	1974-06-01	McMillan
US3849241	1974-11-01	Butin et al.
US3855046	1974-12-01	Hansen et al.
US3859330	1975-01-01	Proskow
US3896802	1975-07-01	Williams
US3907604	1975-09-01	Prentice
US3909009	1975-09-01	Cvetko et al.
US3962386	1976-06-01	Driscoll
US3979529	1976-09-01	Rebentisch et al.
US3998916	1976-12-01	van Turnhout
US4011067	1977-03-01	Carey, Jr.
US4013816	1977-03-01	Sabee et al.
US4035164	1977-07-01	Taylor
US4041203	1977-08-01	Brock et al.
US4058724	1977-11-01	McKinney et al.
US4070218	1978-01-01	Weber
US4091140	1978-05-01	Harrnon
US4096289	1978-06-01	Nischwitz et al.
US4103062	1978-07-01	Aberson et al.
US4140607	1979-02-01	Kreiseimeier et al.
US4170304	1979-10-01	Huke
US4178157	1979-12-01	van Turnhout et al.
US4185972	1980-01-01	Nitta et al.
US4196245	1980-04-01	Kitson et al.
US4208366	1980-06-01	Kinney
US4209563	1980-06-01	Sisson
US4215682	1980-08-01	Kubik et al.
US4223677	1980-09-01	Anderson
US4273635	1981-06-01	Beraud et al.
US4298440	1981-11-01	Hood
US4305797	1981-12-01	Knoll et al.
US4307143	1981-12-01	Meitner
US4308223	1981-12-01	Stern
US4310478	1982-01-01	Balslev et al.
US4323374	1982-04-01	Shinagawa et al.
US4324198	1982-04-01	Muz
US4340563	1982-07-01	Appel et al.
US4342812	1982-08-01	Selwood
US4353799	1982-10-01	Leonard
US4357234	1982-11-01	Inculet et al.
US4363682	1982-12-01	Thiebault
US4363723	1982-12-01	Knoll et al.
US4373224	1983-02-01	Bandai et al.
US4374727	1983-02-01	Takahashi et al.
US4374888	1983-02-01	Bornslaeger
US4375718	1983-03-01	Wadsworth et al.
US4392876	1983-07-01	Schmidt
US4394235	1983-07-01	Brandt et al.
US4411795	1983-10-01	Olson
US4430277	1984-02-01	Lin
US4443513	1984-04-01	Meitner et al.
US4443515	1984-04-01	Atlas
US4451589	1984-05-01	Morman et al.
US4455195	1984-06-01	Kinsley
US4455237	1984-06-01	Kinsley
US4456648	1984-06-01	Adamse et al.
US4492633	1985-01-01	Sandulyak et al.
US4507539	1985-03-01	Sando et al.
US4513049	1985-04-01	Yamasaki et al.
US4514289	1985-04-01	Inculet
US4517143	1985-05-01	Kisler
US4534918	1985-08-01	Forrest, Jr.
US4547420	1985-10-01	Krueger et al.
US4551378	1985-11-01	Carey, Jr.
US4554207	1985-11-01	Lee
US4555811	1985-12-01	Shimalla
US4588537	1986-05-01	Klaase et al.
US4592815	1986-06-01	Nakao
US4594626	1986-06-01	Frangesh
US4618524	1986-10-01	Groitzsch et al.
US4622259	1986-11-01	McAmish et al.
US4623438	1986-11-01	Felton et al.
US4626263	1986-12-01	Inoue et al.
US4652282	1987-03-01	Ohmori et al.
US4652322	1987-03-01	Lim
US4657639	1987-04-01	Mahadevan et al.
US4657804	1987-04-01	Mays et al.
US4663220	1987-05-01	Wisneski
US4670913	1987-06-01	Morell et al.
US4671943	1987-06-01	Wahlquist
US4677017	1987-06-01	DeAntonis et al.
US4689241	1987-08-01	Richart et al.
US4699823	1987-10-01	Kellenberger et al.
US4705151	1987-11-01	Eldridge
US4707398	1987-11-01	Boggs
US4714647	1987-12-01	Shipp, Jr. et al.
US4720415	1988-01-01	VanderWielen et al.
US4729371	1988-03-01	Krueger et al.
US4738772	1988-04-01	Giesfeldt
US4739882	1988-04-01	Parikh et al.
US4749348	1988-06-01	Klaase et al.
US4761326	1988-08-01	Barnes et al.
US4789504	1988-12-01	Ohmori et al.
US4795668	1989-01-01	Krueger et al.
US4797201	1989-01-01	Kuppers et al.
US4797318	1989-01-01	Brooker et al.
US4818464	1989-04-01	Lau
US4826703	1989-05-01	Kisler
US4831664	1989-05-01	Suda
US4847914	1989-07-01	Suda
US4859266	1989-08-01	Akasaki et al.
US4863785	1989-09-01	Berman et al.
US4863983	1989-09-01	Johnson et al.
US4874399	1989-10-01	Reed et al.
US4874659	1989-10-01	Ando et al.
US4883052	1989-11-01	Weiss et al.
US4886527	1989-12-01	Fottinger et al.
US4894131	1990-01-01	Jacobs et al.
US4901370	1990-02-01	Suda
US4904174	1990-02-01	Moosmayer et al.
US4920168	1990-04-01	Nohr et al.
US4944854	1990-07-01	Felton et al.
US4948515	1990-08-01	Okumura et al.
US4948639	1990-08-01	Brooker et al.
US4960820	1990-10-01	Hwo
US4965122	1990-10-01	Morman
US4983677	1991-01-01	Johnson et al.
US5012094	1991-04-01	Hamade
US5021501	1991-06-01	Ohmori et al.
US5032419	1991-07-01	Lamirand et al.
US5035941	1991-07-01	Blackburn
US5051159	1991-09-01	Togashi et al.
US5055151	1991-10-01	Duffy
US5057710	1991-10-01	Nishiura et al.
US5062158	1991-11-01	Oka et al.
US5077468	1991-12-01	Hamade
US5090975	1992-02-01	Requejo et al.
US5110620	1992-05-01	Tani et al.
US5112048	1992-05-01	Deeds
US5112677	1992-05-01	Tani et al.
US5118942	1992-06-01	Hamade
US5135724	1992-08-01	Dinter et al.
US5138971	1992-08-01	Nakajima et al.
US5143767	1992-09-01	Matsuura et al.
US5149335	1992-09-01	Killenberger et al.
US5156902	1992-10-01	Pieper et al.
US5165979	1992-11-01	Watkins et al.
US5169706	1992-12-01	Collier et al.
US5173356	1992-12-01	Eaton et al.
US5178932	1993-01-01	Perkins et al.
US5183701	1993-02-01	Jacobs et al.
US5188885	1993-02-01	Timmons et al.
US5204174	1993-04-01	Daponte et al.
US5206061	1993-04-01	Ando et al.
US5213881	1993-05-01	Timmons et al.
US5213882	1993-05-01	Sassa et al.
US5226992	1993-07-01	Morman
US5230727	1993-07-01	Pound et al.
US5232770	1993-08-01	Joseph
US5238733	1993-08-01	Joseph et al.
US5244482	1993-09-01	Hassenboehler, Jr.
US5246637	1993-09-01	Matsuura et al.
US5247072	1993-09-01	Ning et al.
US5254297	1993-10-01	Deeds
US5256176	1993-10-01	Matsuura et al.
US5257982	1993-11-01	Cohen et al.
US5264276	1993-11-01	McGregor et al.
US5284703	1994-02-01	Everhart et al.
US5286326	1994-02-01	Greve
US5294482	1994-03-01	Gessner
US5306534	1994-04-01	Bosses
US5308674	1994-05-01	Zafiroglu
US5308691	1994-05-01	Lim et al.
US5336545	1994-08-01	Morman
US5350620	1994-09-01	Sundet et al.
US5389202	1995-02-01	Everhart et al.
US5397413	1995-03-01	Trimble et al.
US5401446	1995-03-01	Tsai et al.
US5407581	1995-04-01	Onodera et al.
US5409766	1995-04-01	Yuasa et al.
US5411576	1995-05-01	Jones et al.
US5436033	1995-07-01	Mino et al.
US5436066	1995-07-01	Chen
US5441550	1995-08-01	Hassenboehler, Jr.
US5443606	1995-08-01	Hassenboehler, Jr.
US5455108	1995-10-01	Quincy et al.
US5456972	1995-10-01	Roth et al.
US5464688	1995-11-01	Timmons et al.
US5468428	1995-11-01	Hanschen et al.
US5472481	1995-12-01	Jones et al.
US5482765	1996-01-01	Bradley et al.
US5486411	1996-01-01	Hassenboehler, Jr. et al.
US5491022	1996-02-01	Smith
US5493117	1996-02-01	Tamaki et al.
US5496507	1996-03-01	Angadjivand et al.
US5503745	1996-04-01	Ogata et al.
US5552012	1996-09-01	Morris et al.
US5620785	1997-04-01	Watt et al.
US5637165	1997-06-01	Chen
CAX1188452	1985-06-01
EPX125851	1984-11-01
EPX156160	1985-10-01
EPX334829	1989-09-01
EPX337662	1989-10-01
EPX375234	1990-06-01
EPX391725	1990-10-01
EPX444671	1991-09-01
EPX462574	1991-12-01
EPX478011	1992-04-01
EPX497072	1992-08-01
EPX520798	1992-12-01
EPX550029	1993-07-01
EPX575629	1993-12-01
EPX576738	1994-01-01
EPX594123	1994-04-01
EPX754796	1997-01-01
DEX1084015	1957-09-01
DEX4447152	1995-07-01
JPX58-076118	1958-07-01
JPX62-053719	1987-08-01
JPX62-074423	1987-09-01
JPX1-246413	1989-10-01
JPX5-064713	1993-03-01
GBX2026379	1980-02-01
GBX2242142	1991-09-01
WOX81/03265	1981-11-01
WOX90/11784	1990-10-01
WOX91/08254	1991-06-01
WOX92/16681	1992-10-01
WOX93/06168	1993-04-01
WOX93/09156	1993-05-01
WOX94/00166	1994-01-01
WOX94/01068	1994-01-01
WOXWO94/00166	1994-01-01
WOX95/05232	1995-02-01
WOX95/05501	1995-02-01
WOX95/22646	1995-08-01
WOX96/00093	1996-01-01
WOX97/04155	1997-02-01

Non-Patent Literature (21)

U.S. application No. 08/198,298, Feb. 22, 1994, Improved Nonwoven Barrier And Method Of Making The Same.
U.S. application No. 08/266,293, Jul. 27, 1994, Improved Nonwoven Barrier And Method Of Making The Same.
U.S. application No. 08/351,966, Dec. 08, 1994, Method Of Forming A Particle Size Gradient In An Absorbent Article.
U.S. application No. 08/366,850, Dec. 30, 1994, Improved Nonwoven Laminate Barrier Material.
U.S. application No. 08/405,485, Mar. 16, 1995, Nonwoven Laminate Barrier Material.
U.S. application No. 08/450,043, May 25, 1995, Filter Matrix.
U.S. application No. 08/504,209, Jul. 19, 1994, Nonwoven Barrier And Method Of Making The Same.
U.S. application No. 08/690,587, Jul. 31, 1996, Improved Nonwoven Barrier.
J. van Turnhout: Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 33, Chapter 3 "Thermally Stimulated Discharge of Electrets", pp. 81-215 (1980).
J. van Turnhout: Thermally Stimulated Discharge of Polymer Electrets, Chapter 1, pp. 1-24 (1975).
G.M. Sessler: Electronic Properties of Polymers, Chapter 3 "Charge Storage", pp. 59-107.
"Bonding Process", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 14, No. 12, May 1972.
USSN 08/242,948 filed May 16, 1994 entitled "Nonwoven Absorbent Polymeric Fabric Exhibition Improvement Fluid Management And Methods For Making The Same".
An Introduction to Electrostatic Separation, Technical Bulletin, Bulletin 8570, Carpco, Inc.
Electrostatic Separation of Mixed Granular Solids by Oliver C. Ralston, Elsevier Publishing Company, 1961, Chapter IV, "Applications of Electrostatic Separation", pp. 134-234.
Database WPI, Section Ch, Week 8930, Derwent Publications, Ltd., London, GB; Class A94,AN 89-217687 XP002005648 & JP,A,01 156 578 (Showa Denko), 20 Jun. 1989, See Abstract.
Database WPI, Section Ch, Week 8428, Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A87, AN 84-173431, XP002008760, & JP,A,59 094 621 (Unitika KK), 31 May 1984, see abstract.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 10, No. 71 (C-334), 20 Mar. 1986 & JP,A,60 209220 (Kouken K.K.), 21 Oct. 1985, see abstract.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 6, No 191 (C-127), 30 Sep. 1982 & JP,A,57 105217 (Nitta K.K.), 30 Jun. 1982, see abstract & Chemical Abstracts, vol. 97, No. 26, 27 Dec. 1982, Columbus, Ohio, US; abstract No. 218901, "Fibrous Filtering Material", see abstract.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 11, No. 315 (C-451), 14 Oct. 1987 & JP,A,62 102809 (Mitsui Petrochem. Ind. Ltd.), 13 May 1987, see abstract & Database WPI, Section CH, Week 8725, Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A12, AN 87-172842 & JP,A,62 102 809 (Mitsui Petrochem. Ind. Co. Ltd.), 13 May 1987, see abstract).
Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 21, 1988, Amsterdam NL, pp. 81-98, XP002012022, P. A. Smith & G. C. East: "Generation of Triboelectric Charge in Textile Fibre Mistures, and their use as Air Filters", see document.

Abstract

Description