Gasket for Sealing Electromagnetic Waves

The present invention generally relates to canted-coil springs and seals and, more particularly, relates to canted-coil springs retained in a cavity with interference between the spring coils and the cavity to retain the spring in a selected orientation for subsequent loading of the spring. Orienting the spring for major or minor axis loading enables a specific selected resilient, or load-deflection, characteristic, in response to the subsequent loading of the springs.

It should be appreciated that cavities as hereinafter discussed may be linear or continuous with a desired shape, be it circular or otherwise. For as in circular cavities, the spring may have end coils welded forming a garter-type canted coil spring.

Of particular interest is a gasket for sealing electromagnetic waves between a shaft and a housing as a piston and a bore. In this instance, the gasket is loaded radially to prevent passage of electromagnetic waves past the shaft or bore.

It is generally well known that electromagnetic transmission may be described by wave theory and, further, in terms of an electric and a magnetic field which travel in a 90 degree phase relationship with one another in free space. Wave theory describes electromagnetic energy in terms of wavelength and amplitude.

It should be appreciated that electromagnetic energy is used here as a generic term including the full spectrum of electromagnetic energy frequencies. Generally speaking, electromagnetic interference (EMI) and radio frequency interference (RFI) are used to describe interference caused by unwanted electromagnetic energy or radio frequency energy entering or leaving a designated piece of equipment.

The ability to shield a component from egress or ingress of electromagnetic energy is often called shield effectiveness.

Microwave energy having frequencies from about 100 KHz to about 300 GHz is commonly referred to as microwaves. The microwave frequencies spectrum may be further divided in three general groups, which include commercial bands, 100 Kz to 10 GHz, military bands, 10 GHz to 50 GHz and millimeter bands 50 GHz to 300 GHz.

Shield effectiveness of any particular frequency range is significantly affected by any gaps or openings therein which will allow electromagnetic fields to radiate therethrough unless current continuity can be preserved across the opening. The importance of the opening is, of course, dependent upon the frequency of the impinging electromagnetic energy. It should be understood that the shielding effectiveness is a measure of the efficiency of an EMI gasket measured in decibels (dB) the higher the shielding effectiveness, the more effective a gasket is. Such shielding effectiveness is affected by the opening between coils and "aperture" as herein used is defined as the maximum linear dimension (not area) of this opening. The greater the size of the aperture the lower the shielding effectiveness. The aperture is the maximum linear dimension of a shield opening. Therefore, in a gasket, it is desirable to have the smallest aperture possible to achieve maximum shielding effectiveness.

Two general types of spring gaskets disclosed in the present invention include one having spacing between coils when loaded, and another having coils butted at load. The butted coils provide the smallest aperture and thus the maximum shielding effectiveness.

The length of the aperture in a spring gasket, as hereinafter disclosed, is affected by the wire diameter, the D/d ratio and the spacing between coils.

As a general rule, for effective shielding in commercial use, the opening size should be less than the wavelength of the electromagnetic energy divided by 20. For military bands the opening size should be less than the wavelength divided by 50 and for the millimeter bands the opening should be less than the wavelength divided by 200. Because of the dependence on the wavelength, the effectiveness of any gasket may be determined at a particular frequency the size of the openings or apertures therein.

Heretofore available gaskets have been unable to provide dimensional stability throughout the life of equipment in order to prevent the formation of unwanted gaps therein which may be unacceptable in terms of shield effectiveness. This is especially true when the gaskets are utilized in situations where repeated disassembly and assembly is needed with the gasket relied on to prevent EMI or RFI between components requiring such assembly.

The gasket of the present invention, however, provides an effective electromagnetic shield through the use of a plurality of conductive wire coils and means for loading the plurality of coils in a manner so that the coil spacing may be adjusted in selected areas along the circumference thereof in order to provide an electromagnetic shield. In addition, the gasket of the present invention provides sufficient biasing capability to take up for variations that may occur due to torquing, eccentricities, irregularities and other variables, and maintain intimate contact between mating surfaces under load.

In accordance with the present invention, a resilient electromagnetic shielding gasket includes a coil spring means for blocking the propagation of electromagnetic waves therepast, said coil spring means including a plurality of individual canted coils along a centerline thereof and means for supporting the plurality of coils in an orientation for controlling the electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of the coil spring means.

Also provided are means, cooperating with said means for supporting the plurality of coils for loading the plurality of coils to control an aperture of the coil spring means through which electromagnetic waves can propagate.

In one embodiment of the present invention, a wedge is included which provides means for causing said individual coils to abutt one another.

In addition, back angle means may be provided for both defining the disposition of a trailing portion of each coil with respect to a line normal to the center-provide line and, importantly, for determining the working resilient range of the gasket. Front angle means may be provided for defining the disposition of a leading portion of each coil with respect to the normal line with the front angle means being greater than the back angle means.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the back angle means defines a working resilient range wherein the gasket exhibits a generally constant force in response to deflection of the gasket. In this manner, minor variations, tolerances, eccentricities or variations due to temperature and environmental conditions which may generally affect the spacing between mating parts do not affect the loading or sealing force therebetween provided by the gasket. This distinguishes the gasket of the present invention heretofore available as an electromagnetic shielding gasket.

Means, orienting the plurality of coils at a turn angle may be provided for controlling the magnitude of the generally constant force within the selected range of deflection.

While the overall shape of the plurality of coils may be linear or of any geometric configuration, they may be interconnected in a manner forming a continuous gasket which may take a circular shape. In this latter embodiment, the coils may be interconnected in a manner such that the trailing portion is along an inside diameter of the gasket and the leading portion is along an outside of the gasket, or the trailing portion may be disposed along an outside diameter of the gasket and the leading portion along an inside diameter of the gasket.

In another embodiment of the present invention, the means for loading or preloading the plurality of coils may be by means defining a groove for holding the plurality of coils and wedge means for deflecting the plurality of coils along a minor axis thereof. The wedge means may be suspended in the groove means and biased by the plurality of coils against an opposing loading surface or the wedge means may be fixed to an opposing loading surface and the wedge may be fixed in the groove.

In this circular configuration, the seal-load portion of each coil collectively defines a load circle and the wedge means is operative for compressing the circular axially resilient gasket along the minor axis thereof for reducing the load circle.

The coils may be interconnected to provide for either an axially resilient electromagnetic shielding gasket or a radially resilient electromagnetic shielding gasket.

In another embodiment of the present invention, the butting of the spring coils at load, compared to a spring with spacing between coils, results in a smaller aperture and higher shielding effectiveness.

The advantages and features of the present invention will appear from the following description and considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a theoretical load vs. a deflection curve illustrating the various parameters of a electromagnetic shielding gasket in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a plan view of an electromagnetic shielding gasket in accordance with the present invention in which coils are interconnected in a manner forming an axially resilient coil gasket with a trailing portion having a back angle along an inside diameter of the gasket and a leading portion having a front angle along an outside diameter of the gasket, the coils being interconnected to produce a clockwise canting of the coils (the coils also may be interconnected to produce a counterclockwise canting, see FIG. 4);

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the gasket shown in FIG. 2 taken along a line 3--3 and showing the relative position of the back angle and the front angle of the spring;

FIG. 4 is a plan view of an electromagnetic shielding gasket in accordance with the present invention in which the coils are interconnected to define an axially resilient electromagnetic shielding gasket with a trailing portion having a back angle along an outside diameter of the gasket and a leading portion having front angle along an inside diameter of the gasket, the coils being interconnected to produce a counter-clockwise canting of the coils (the coils also may be interconnected to produce a clockwise canting, see FIG. 2);

FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the electromagnetic gasket of FIG. 4 taken along the line 5--5 and showing the relative positions of the front and the back angle;

FIG. 6 is an electromagnetic gasket in accordance with the present invention in which the coils are interconnected to form a radially resilient electromagnetic gasket;

FIG. 7 shows an axially resilient electromagnetic gasket disposed in a cone position and having a load turn angle which may vary, but is shown therein at about 45.degree.;

FIG. 8 is a perspective view of the axially resilient electromagnetic gasket of FIG. 7 taken along a load line and showing a load line, or circle, at which a portion of each coil in the electromagnetic gasket has a spacing between coils;

FIG. 8a shows, in cross section, an alternative embodiment in which the coils may abutt upon preloading or loading thereof;

FIG. 9 is an axially resilient electromagnetic gasket shown in a loaded position and in an inverted cone position in which the load turn angle may vary, but is shown therein at about 45.degree.;

FIG. 10 is an axially resilient electromagnetic gasket loaded along the minor axis thereof with a spring load turn angle of about 0 degrees;

FIG. 11 is an axially resilient electromagnetic gasket loaded along the minor axis thereof, forming a cone, the load turn angle may be from 0 degrees to about 30 degrees. As shown, it is about 15 degrees;

FIG. 12 is a radially resilient electromagnetic gasket disposed in a housing groove;

FIG. 12a is an electromagnetic shielding gasket assembled into housing grooves with a wedge providing means for loading the coils from the outside diameter towards the inside diameter causing the coils to progressively butt from the inside diameter towards the outside diameter;

FIG. 13 is a radially resilient electromagnetic gasket disposed in a shaft groove;

FIG. 13a is an electromagnetic shielding gasket assembled in a piston groove with a wedge providing means for loading the coils in a manner causing the coils to deflect and progressively butt from the inside diameter to the outside diameter;

FIG. 14 is a diagram of an axially resilient electromagnetic gasket showing the loading thereof and showing a wedge for deflecting the gasket along the minor axis thereof, to a butt angle position;

FIG. 15 is an alternative embodiment of the present invention;

FIGS. 16, 17 and 18 are alternative embodiments of the present invention utilizing different shaped wedges and grooves;

FIGS. 19, 20 and 21 are alternative embodiments of the present invention showing a wedge in position for compressing radially resilient electromagnetic gasket;

FIG. 22 shows a typical application of an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 23 shows an alternative embodiment of the present invention in which the groove is defined by mating portions thereby preloading the spring before loading thereof by a third mating member;

FIG. 24 is an axial or radial load deflection curve for a typical axially resilient electromagnetic coil spring in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 25 is a coil spring in an unloaded or free state;

FIG. 26 shows the coil of FIG. 25 in a loaded state with spacing between the individual coils;

FIG. 27 is a cross-section of a single individual coil of the loaded coil of FIG. 26 showing the maximum linear dimension or operation, L, available for electromagnetic wave propagation;

FIG. 28 shows the effect of wire diameter (d) or shield effectiveness for the coils of FIG. 26;

FIG. 29 shows the effect of coil diameter (D) or shield effectiveness for the coils of FIG. 26;

FIG. 30 is a coil spring in an unloaded or free state;

FIG. 31 shows the coil of FIG. 29 in a loaded state with the individual coils abutting one another, the wedge causing such butting now shown;

FIG. 32 is a cross-section of adjacent individual coils showing the maximum linear dimension, L, available for electromagnetic wave propagation;

FIG. 33 shows the effect of wire diameter, d, or shield effectiveness for the coils of FIG. 31; and

FIG. 34 shows the effect of coil diameter (D) or shield effectiveness for the coil of FIG. 31.

FIG. 35 and 36 show an axial spring gasket deflected to safety load with spacing between coils at load;

FIG. 37 and 38 show the spring gasket of FIG. 35 and 36 load with a wedge with coils butting at a load circle; and

FIG. 39 is a plot of Shielding Effectiveness vs Frequency for plane wave and magnetic fields showing the difference between abutting coils at load and non-abutting coils at load for the spring gaskets of FIG. 35-38.

A resilient electromagnetic shielding gasket in accordance with the present invention may be described, in part, by its load-deflection characteristics.

Depending on its application, a number of load-deflection characteristics may be utilized; however, of particular use is a gasket which exerts a generally constant force in response to deflection of the gasket. This feature enables the gasket, in accordance with the present invention, to accommodate variations in mating surfaces between which electromagnetic shielding is to be provided. Such variations may be due to surface irregularities, tolerances, or temperature and pressure effects. The shielding gasket provides a stable, long-lived gasket capable of shielding against electromagnetic radiation in a consistent manner over time, despite temperature and pressure effects, and/or continued assembly and disassembly of mating parts.

For the purposes of describing a desirable load-deflection characteristic, an exemplary load-deflection curve 10 is shown in FIG. 1. As can be seen when a load is applied to the gasket, it deflects in a generally linear fashion as represented by the line segment 12 until it reaches a minimum load point 14 which represents the point at which, after the initial deflection, the load begins deflection, the load begins to remain relatively constant.

It should be appreciated that for an axially resilient gasket, hereinafter described, the load is applied axially and for a radially resilient gasket, hereinafter described, the load is applied radially.

Between the minimum load point 14 and a maximum load point 16, the load-deflection curve may be constant or show a slight increase as shown in FIG. 1. The area between the minimum load point 14 and the maximum working load point 18 is known as a working deflection range 18.

The gasket is normally loaded for operation within this range, as indicated by the point 20, for a typical gasket in accordance with the present invention, for electromagnetic shielding purposes. In addition, the gasket also may provide sealing between the mating surfaces.

Loading of the gasket beyond the maximum load point 16 results in an abrupt deflection response until it reaches a butt point 22, which results in a permanent set in the gasket as a result of overloading. Also indicated in FIG. 1, is the total deflection range 24, which is defined as the deflection between the unloaded gasket and the deflection of the maximum working load point 16.

A gasket, as hereinafter identified, in accordance with the present invention, may assume many forms. For example, it may be linear, have any irregular shape, or be interconnected to form a round, elliptical or other continuous shape, as hereinafter discussed.

First, an axially resilient electromagnetic shield, or gasket, 30 as shown in FIG. 2, may have a plurality of coils 32 interconnected in a manner such that a trailing portion 34, see FIG. 3, is along an inside diameter 36 of the gasket 30 and a leading portion 38 is along an outside diameter 40 of the gasket 30. FIG. 2 shows the gasket 30 interconnected and wound with a clockwise canting of coils. An alternative embodiment (not shown) may be made as described in FIGS. 2 and 3 but having the coils instead canting in a counterclockwise and wound in a counterclockwise direction as shown in FIG. 4.

From FIG. 3, it can be seen that the back angle 42 provides means for defining the disposition of the trailing portion 34 of each coil with respect to a line 44 normal to the centerline 46 and a front angle 48 provides means for defining the disposition of the leading portion 38 of each coil with respect to a normal line 50. The back angle 42 additionally determines the working resilient range of the gasket as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,826,144 and 4,915,366. Specific details of the use of the back angle to determine the gasket resilient range are disclosed within these references, which are incorporated herewith by specific reference thereto, and not discussed in detail herein as they disclosed in the cited references.

Turning now to FIGS. 4 and 5, there is shown an axially resilient circular gasket 60 having a plurality of coils 62 interconnected in a fashion providing a counter-clockwise canting of coils and as shown in FIG. 5, having a back angle 64 defining a trailing portion 66 along an outside diameter 68 and a front angle 70 defining a leading portion 72 along the inside diameter 74 of he gasket 60.

FIG. 4 shows the gasket 60 interconnected and wound with a counterclockwise canting of coils. An alternative embodiment (not shown) may be made as described in FIGS. 4 and 5 but having the direction of canting in a clockwise direction (see FIG. 2). In addition, the direction of winding may be reversed.

As shown in FIG. 6, another embodiment of the present invention, an electromagnetic gasket 80 may include a plurality of conductive coils 82 canted along a centerline 84 thereof and interconnected in a manner forming a circular radially resistant gasket. Loading of the gasket 80 occurs in a radial manner as indicated by the load arrows 86.

Turning now to FIG. 7, there is shown in a diagrammatic cross-sectional manner the axially resilient gasket 30 disposed in a groove 90, which provides means for preloading the plurality of coils 32 in a manner causing coil spacing along the circumference of the inside diameter of the spring as loaded to be less along the inside diameter 98 and such spacing to increase progressively at seal-load 92 of each coil 32 and increase further towards the O.D. of the spring.

The coil spacing along these seal-load portions 92 is selected to limit the passage of electromagnetic energy with a wave length greater than a selected value.

To more clearly show the relationship of the seal-load portion 92, a diagrammatic perspective view taken along a load circle 96 is shown in FIG. 8. The load line/circle 96 being collectively defined by the seal-load portions 92 of the coils 32.

FIG. 8 shows the gasket 30 in a loaded position with spacing between coils.

As shown in FIG. 7, load sealing points 100 are coincident with the load circle 96 when the gasket 30 is disposed in the groove 90 at a load turn angle .gamma. which may be from about 1 degrees to 90 degrees, and preferably 45 degrees. The gasket 30 is shown in a "cone" configuration and as such develops a small load circle which is disposed proximate the gasket inside diameter 36. (See FIG. 2). After assembly of the gasket 30 into the groove 90, it is generally loaded by a flange 110.

The best shielding effectiveness with the spring described in FIGS. 7 and 8 is achieved when the aperture is at a minimum which occurs when the wire diameter is at maximum, the D/d ratio is at a minimum and the spacing between coils is at maximum.

The groove width 112 may be either smaller, equal to or larger than the coil height 114. However, it is preferable that the groove width is greater than the coil height as there is less possibility of spring damage upon loading the spring.

In the configuration shown in FIG. 7, the gasket 30 will have a force-deflection characteristic which generally provides a force versus deflection where the force remains generally constant within the working deflection. However, if the assembly turn angle, see FIG. 35, is greater than 70 degrees, there will be a tendency for snapping of the spring, which can occur when the groove width is equal or smaller than the coil height, specially when the spring back angle is at the O.D. which causes the force versus deflection curve to rise rapidly above the constant force and this is an indication that the fatiguing of the gasket may occur.

FIG. 8a shows a cross-section of the gasket 30 which is loaded with coils 32 abutting which shows a minimum area 102 subtended by the surface of adjoining and abutting coils 32 and a load surface 106. A conductive wire 108 may be disposed between abutting coils 32 in the area 102 for providing insert means to further limit the passage of electromagnetic therepast, or between the abutting coils 32. The conductive insert wire 108 may have a circular or V shape cross-section in order to more fully occupy the area 102.

Turning now to FIG. 9, there is shown an alternative embodiment of the present invention in which an axially resilient gasket 120 is shown in a loading position having a load turn angle which may be between 1 degrees and 90 degrees, a preferred load turn angle of 45 degrees being shown. The gasket assumes an inverted cone shape and the position of the gasket is similar to the axial cone gasket except that upon assembling the gasket into the cavity is in an inverted position which is 180 degrees from the cone position.

The load circle 122 is substantially larger than in the axial cone type spring 30 and that allows greater open spacing between the coils occurs at the load circle 122. The force vs. deflection characteristics of this type gasket is as shown in FIG. 1, with an initial higher peak above the constant force when the assembly turn angle .gamma., (see FIG. 35), is greater than 70 degrees and the spring back angle is at the O.D. instead of the I.D.

Shown in FIG. 10 is an axially resilient gasket 140 as shown loaded along a minor axis 42 thereof. In this instance, the groove width G.sub.W is greater than the coil width C.sub.W.

Another positioning of an axially resilient cone gasket 150 is shown in FIG. 11 in which the axial turn angle is between 0 and about 30 degrees and the load along the load circle 152 is along a minor axis 154 of the gasket 150. More detailed description of a coil preloading and loading within the groove will be hereinafter discussed in greater detail.

Shown in FIGS. 12 and 13 are radial resilient gaskets 160, 162, respectively, in accordance with the present invention, shown within grooves 164 and 166, formed in a housing 168 and a shaft 170, respectively.

The hereinafter discussed parameter regarding the positioning of the springs 160 and 162 within the grooves 164, 166, respectively, are similar to the groove spring relationship, as hereinafter discussed in connection with the axially or radially resilient gaskets 30, 120, 140 and 150.

FIG. 12a shows the spring 160 disposed in a housing 168a having two portions 168b, 168c with a wedge 168d for defining a cavity 169 between the housing 168a and shaft 170. When assembled, the wedge 168d loads the cavity 160 in a manner causing the spring 160 to progressively abutt from the inside diameter to the outside diameter thereof.

FIG. 13a shows the spring 162 disposed in a piston 170a having a wedge portion 170b defining a cavity 171 which loads the spring in a manner shown in FIG. 31 causing the spring 182 to deflect and progressively abutt from the inside diameter towards the outside diameter.

FIG. 14 shows an enlarged view of an axially resilient electromagnetic shielding gasket 172 within a groove, or cavity, 174 and further including a wedge 176 which may be suspended in the groove 174 and biased by the plurality of coils 178 against an opposing loading surface 180 in order to cause coil spacing along the circumference of adjoining coils to be less along the I.D. of the spring gasket at 206 when in a loaded position than along other coiled portions 184 184 along the circumference thereof. At a load circle 190 the spacing between coils when loaded will be slightly greater than at circumference 206 and such spacing between coils will progressively increase from the I.D. of the spring circumference to the O.D. when loaded.

An important feature of the wedge 171 is the enablement of the coils 178 to abutt without causing fatigue, or permanent set, thereof which may alter the rotation of the coils 178 within the groove 174 and thereby reduce the shielding effectiveness of the gasket 172 upon repeated disassembly and assembly of flange 110 and housing 110a (See FIG. 7). The wedge prevents fatigue by rotation of the coils 178 in a manner increasing the turn angle thereof as herein described. With proper selection of coil grooved and wedge dimensions, the coil can be made to abutt along the load circle, yet be in a spaced apart relationship along other portions 184 of the circumference. Wedge 176 is shown as a separate part, however, it can also be made as an integral part of the loading surface 180.

The separate wedge has the significant advantage that it can accommodate itself to the cavity 174 and may provide substantially better shielding effectiveness than a built-in wedge, shown in FIGS. 12a, and 13a, in cases where the wedge 176 is sufficiently flexible to be able to be deflected by the spring gasket 172.

On the other hand, the built-in wedge has the significant advantage that the wedge and the loading means are in one unit, thus making it easier to fabricate, assemble and load.

As shown in FIG. 14, the groove width G.sub.W may be equal to the groove depth G.sub.D and, for example, these dimensions may be in the order of 0.15 inches. The gasket 172 may have a coil height 194 at turn angle 196 of approximately 45 degrees and a coil width 198 of approximately 0.168 inches and form from wire having approximately 0.16 inch diameter.

As the gasket 172 is loaded within the groove 174 by the wedge 176, rotation of the spring occurs from the 45 degree load angle 196 to a butt turn angle 202, the load circle 190 being shown at the butt point. It can be seen that the coil height 194 decreases as the spring turns decreasing the load circle and therefore reducing the open spaces considerably. As the spring 172 is deflected, the coils 178 begin to butt at the minimum inside diameter 206. As loading then occurs along the load circle and the coils will progressively butt towards the outside diameter 208.

As shown in FIG. 14b showing abutting coils, minimum spacing occurs between the coils when they butt. In this case, the maximum dimension of the exposed space 102 is equal to the wire diameter.

An alternative embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 15 in which a gasket 220 is disposed in a groove 222 and biased by a wedge 224 having a greater width than height. Wedge 224 can also be made as an integral part of the load surface as hereinabove described. Utilizing wedges 224 of different configurations, as for example, shown in FIG. 15, the rate of butting of the coil 220 from the inside diameter to outside diameter as hereinabove described in connection with the gasket 172 may be varied. This enables load-deflection characteristics to be achieved with various groove widths G.sub.W and groove depths G.sub.D .

It is important that along the load circle the coils either approach a butting relationship or remain in a butting relationship within the specific tolerances of the gasket and the groove dimensions. The fact that the coils butt from the inside diameter towards the outside diameter allows for a variation and tolerances of the groove and the gasket so as to avoid a complete butting of the coils which would damage the spring.

FIGS. 16, 17 and 18 show an axially resilient gasket 240 in combination with grooves 242, 244 and 246 and wedges 248, 250, 252, respectively. As hereinabove described, the wedges 248, 250, 252 may be an integral part of the loading surface. These alternative embodiments show the wedge 248 having a leg portion, 254 which can be used to modify the groove width.

Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 17, the groove 244 may have a tapered portion 256 for additionally compressing the spring 240 along the minor axis 258 thereof. Yet another embodiment is shown in FIG. 18 wherein the wedge 250 has a V shape and cooperates with wedge 252 for biasing the spring 240.

FIGS. 19, 20 and 21 show a radially resilient gasket 270 as it may be disposed in grooves 272, 274 and 276, respectively, along with loading by wedges 278, 280, 282. The gasket 270 may be housing 290 mounted or piston 292 mounted. Further, the groove 272, 274, 276 may be disposed in a single housing or a piston, not shown, or alternatively, may be formed in conjunction with a mating member 300, 302, 304, respectively. Similar to the mounting of the axially resilient gasket 240 a wedge shaped gasket 282 may be utilized when a beveled edge 306 incorporated into the mating member 304.

All of the embodiment shown in FIG. 16-21 as well as those shown in FIGS. 22 and 23 are only diagrammatically shown and briefly discussed since the principles of operation were more thoroughly discussed in connection with the gaskets 30 and 170.

For example, FIG. 22 shows a gasket 310 disposed in a groove 312 formed by mating portions 314, 316 which are held in position for biasing by the gasket 110 and by a clip member 318. FIG. 23 shows a built-in wedge 330 for biasing the gasket 332 within a groove 334 formed by right and left hand members 336, 338, with the gasket 332 being loaded by a flange 340.

FIG. 24 shows a specific load-deflection curve for a gasket made in accordance with the present invention having the dimensions set forth in the description of FIG. 14. In this instance the spring is made from wire having a circular cross-section with a diameter of 0.022 inches, a coil height of about 0.16 inches, a back angle of between about 13 and about 15 degrees, a front angle between 28 and 31 degrees and coil spacing of between about 0.19 inches and 0.17 inches.

FIGS. 25-26 showing in diagrammatic form a plurality of coils 350 in an unloaded state and loaded between surfaces 352, 354 along with a load circle 356. A final front angle 358 along with the maximum linear dimension, or aperture, L, available for electromagnetic wave propagation. FIG. 27 is an enlarged view of one coil showing the aperture, L, extending from a point (360) of contact on load surface 352 at the O.D. of the coil 350 to the top 362 of the coil 350 bearing on the load surface 354.

It can be determined that the aperture, L, can be made smaller and hence increase shield effectiveness for a given frequency by increasing coil wire diameter, d. This is shown in FIG. 28. Coil diameter, D, also affects the approximate size. It should be apparent that for a fixed wire diameter, d, an increase in coil diameter, D, decreases shield effectiveness for a given frequency. This is shown in FIG. 29. Consequently, for gaskets in accordance with the present invention in which the individual coils do not abutt, the greater the wire diameter, d, and the smaller the coil 350 diameter, D, the greater the shield effectiveness.

The alternative embodiment of the present invention in which coils 370 abutt is shown in FIG. 30, in a free state, and in FIG. 31, in a loaded state with adjacent coils 370 abutting one another between surfaces 372, 374. The load circle 376 is also shown along with the final front angle 378. FIG. 32 is an enlarged view of the maximum linear dimension, or aperture, L, available for electromagnetic propagation.

It can be easily seen that the aperture, L, for abutting coils 370 is significantly less than the aperture, L, in the case of spaced apart coils 350 shown in FIGS. 26-27. As an example, for the same wire diameter, d, and coil height, D, a gasket with coils 370 abutting has up to four times the shielding effectiveness than coils 350 not abutting.

It is also important to note in the design of abutted coils 370 gaskets, that because the aperture, L, extends between centers 380, 382 of the individual coil wires 384, 386, the larger the wire diameter, the lower the shield effectiveness for a given frequency. (See FIG. 33).

The reverse is also true for the coil diameter to wire diameter rates D/d shown in FIG. 34.

As herein described, shielding effectiveness is affected by the aperture length, L, which is determined, in part, by whether the coils 32 (FIG. 8) are spaced apart at load or abut, as do coils 350. (FIG. 26).

A calculated comparison of the shielding efficiency of a spring 400 having the specification set forth in Table 1 with coils not abutting, see FIGS. 35-36, and coils abutting, see FIGS. 37-38 is shown in FIG. 39.

In FIG. 35, the spring 400 is shown in a groove 402 having a width CW and a height GH with the coils 404 having an assembled turn angle .gamma..sub.AP of about 70.degree. and a load turn angle .gamma..sub.LP of about 45.degree., LC denotes the load circle with the spring 400 axially loaded. The spacing 410 between coils is more clearly shown in FIG. 36 along with the groove inside diameter 412, outside diameter 414 and load circle, LC.

FIG. 37 shows the spring 400 with the coils 404 loaded to a butting position by a wedge 420. In this case the groove 422 has an outside height, GWO, greater than an inside height, GWI. The coils 404 have an assembled turn angle .gamma..sub.AP of about 70.degree. and a load turn angle .gamma..sub.LP of about 55.degree.. As shown in FIG. 38, the coils abut from the groove inside diameter 412 to the load circle LC as indicated also by an arrow 430.

The average aperture for coils 404 abutting and open for various groove I.D., 412 is shown in Table 2.

Shielding Effectiveness vs Frequency for plane wave and magnetic field for the coils 404 abutting and not abutting as shown in FIG. 39.

As shown in FIG. 39, at a frequency of 10 GHz, with the coils 404 open at load (FIGS. 35-36) shielding effectiveness of 80.2 dB is achieved for a plane wave and for the coils (FIGS. 37-38) butting, the shielding effectiveness is 93.5 dB, with the difference between the two springs being 13.3 dB. This change, 13.3 dB corresponds to an increase in shielding effectiveness of 6.6 times greater when the coils 404 are butting at load.

For a magnetic field, the difference in shielding effectiveness is also 13.3, and, therefore, the increase in shielding effectiveness when the coils are butting versus when the coils are open is, again, 6.6 times greater.

Although there has been described hereinabove a specific electromagnetic shielding gasket in accordance with the present invention for the purpose of illustrating the manner in which the invention may be used to advantage, it should be appreciated that the invention is not limited thereto. Accordingly, any and all modifications, variations or equivalent arrangements which may occur to those skilled in the art, should be considered to be within the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.