US RE35,381 EGrant
Ballistic Optimizing System for Rifles
Issue Date:1996-11-26
•66 Claims
•6 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A ballistic optimizing system for use on a preferably bedded rifle comprising a movable weight element secured to the end of a rifle barrel such that said weight element can be moved axially along said barrel to change the effective weight applied for vibration dampening purposes and having an indicator for indicating the relative position of said weight element on said barrel and further including an additional weight releasably secured to said movable weight element and ports through said weight element to allow gas escape.
Metadata
Assignee
- Browning
Inventor
- Clyde E. Rose
Application Information
Application Number:US 5451329
Filing Date:1995-10-19
Priority Date:1995-10-19
Art Unit:231
Classifications
IPC:
F41A 2136
Field of Search:
428975.02;76.01;79;97;10514.05;14.1;14.2;14.3;14.4;14.5
Patent Drawings (6 sheets)
Description
Background of the Invention
1. Field
This invention relates to rifles and particularly to systems for increasing the accuracy of rifles. It is particularly directed to systems including weight devices affixed to the muzzle end of rifle barrels to dampen vibration resulting from the firing of bullets through such barrels. It is also directed to muzzle brakes attached to rifle muzzles to channel discharged propulsion gases in directions other than axially as the slug from a fired bullet travels the length of the barrel.
2. State of the Art
There has long been a desire among marksmen for firearms to be as accurate and consistent as possible during firing. This desire is particularly characteristic of marksmen who engage in rifle target shooting competitions. Consequently, considerable effort has been to eliminate or at least minimize those factors that adversely affect accurate shooting. It is well recognized that two of the factors adversely affecting accurate rifle marksmanship are (1) the barrel vibration which inevitably occurs upon firing of the weapon and (2) the recoil to which the marksman is subjected upon firing. Attempts to eliminate such barrel vibration and recoil have involved the use of various types and kinds of bedding materials as shock absorbers and dampeners between the barrel and the action assemblies and stocks of a rifle. The kinds and positioning of mounting screws associated with the components of a rifle have been the subject of design scrutiny. Different stock and barrel configurations have been tried. Nevertheless, inconsistent paths of trajectory of ballistic slugs discharged from their muzzles remain inherently characteristic of rifles. .[.These inconsistencies are particularly objectionable with the firing of certain factory loaded cartridges, due to the vibrations of the barrels which are inevitably set in motion upon discharge of a firearm which is not designed specifically for use with that cartridge..].
It has been recognized that, in some cases, it is possible to "match" a particular rifle with a particular cartridge to minimize barrel vibration, thereby to increase accuracy. To "match" a cartridge with a particular rifle, it may be necessary to vary .[.slug.]. bullet weight or type, the type .[.and.]. or amount of powder used, or other factors.[., such as the center of gravity of the rifle.].. A best match of ammunition will result in the exiting of a .[.slug.]. bullet from the barrel muzzle at or as near as possible to .[.the peak.]. a anti-node (i.e., peaks and valleys that correspond to minimum barrel velocity) of the vibration curve .[.for the.]. representative of transverse barrel vibrations induced by the firing of the rifle. When the exit of the bullet is at a .[.peak.]. node of the vibration curve as plotted against time, minimal bullet path deflection occurs (see FIG. 8).
Weights have been heretofore attached to the muzzle ends of rifle barrels as a means of dampening barrel vibrations set in motion by discharge of the firearm. U.S. Pat. No. 4,726,280, for example, discloses mounting a muzzle member.[., which serves as a counterweight.]. on the muzzle end of a gun barrel. Although not stated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,726,280, it is generally understood that such a muzzle member may serve as a counterweight. The muzzle member is threaded onto the barrel, and is locked in place. Anschutz and Co. G.M.B., through the 1989 catalog of its distributor, Precision sales International, Inc of Westfield, Mass., discloses, at pages 11 and 16, barrel extensions for rifles that include removable weights. .[.Interchanging these weights enables a marksman to vary selectively the amount of weight used for dampening purposes..]. Although not stated in the 1989 catalog of Anschutz and Co. G.M.B., it is understood that interchanging such weights may enable a marksman to vary selectively the amount of weight used for damping purposes.
Muzzle brakes have also been used in the past with rifles. The known muzzle brakes function to exhaust propulsion gases as a means of reducing recoil and of dissipating propulsion gases in a direction or directions other than out the muzzle of the barrel. The muzzle brakes heretofore known characteristically cause a noticeable increase in noise and concussion to the marksman. The known muzzle brakes have been attached to the muzzle end or a rifle barrel, and thus inherently add a dampening weight.
Summary of the Invention
The ballistic optimizing system (BOS) of the present invention is for the purpose of increasing the shooting accuracy achievable with rifles. The invention provides an adjustable structural means to dampen barrel vibrations. Preferred embodiments additionally provide structural means to reduce recoil .[.without generation of any significant sound increase, and in some instances with a slight sound reduction.]..
The system of the invention adds a weight element to the muzzle end of a rifle barrel. The .[.effective center of gravity.]. vibrational characteristics of the barrel .[.is.]. can be adjustably changed by positioning the weight element axially along the barrel, either toward or away from its muzzle end. By this means, it becomes possible to "match" the rifle to a particular ammunition. That is, the .[.slug of a.]. bullet for which the weight element is properly positioned will repeatedly exit the muzzle at .[.the.]. an optimum time to experience minimum barrel travel deflection (see FIG. 8). Thus, it is unnecessary to select a cartridge based upon the inherent responses of a particular rifle. Accordingly, factory loaded ammunition can be shot with accuracies heretofore unobtainable, Moreover, different factory loaded cartridges can be fired accurately from the same rifle by merely making appropriate system adjustments.
According to the present invention, the weight element is repositioned selectively forwardly toward or rearwardly away from the muzzle end of a rifle barrel. The mass of the weight element thus becomes a .[.critical.]. controlling mass. An appropriate mechanism, such as a lock nut, is used to retain the weight element in selected position and contributes some mass to the weight element. For purposes of this disclosure, the locking mechanism is regarded as a portion of the weight element, and its mass is a part of the .[.critical or.]. controlling adjustable mass. The rifle is matched to a particular ammunition by positioning of the weight element to an empirically determined location, referred to as the "sweet spot." The "sweet spot" is that location of the weight element along the axis of a rifle barrel at which the trajectories of a series of substantially similar .[.ballistic slugs.]. bullets discharged from the muzzle of the rifle held in a stationary position exhibit a minimum deviation (see FIG. 8). The weight element may need to be repositioned to find the "sweet spot" of the rifle for a different cartridge. It has been found that in some instances even very small movements of the .[.critical.]. controlling adjustable mass will effect a significant change in the accuracy of a rifle filled with the present ballistic optimizing system.
In one presently preferred embodiment of the invention a lock nut is threaded onto a rifle barrel and an interiorly threaded, tubular weight is also threaded onto the barrel to engage and lock against the lock nut. The lock nut has a skirt that telescopes over a portion of the rifle barrel. A graduated linear scale on the barrel cooperates with an edge of the skirt to provide an indication of the position of the lock nut relative to the muzzle of the rifle barrel. A scale around the edge of the skirt is indicative of the extent to which the lock nut and skirt are rotated between full rotations, which full rotations are indexed on the linear scale.
In another presently preferred embodiment of the system of the invention, the wall of an interiorly threaded, tubular weight is provided with angled ports and straight ports therethrough to allow escape of propellant gases. The weight then additionally functions as a muzzle brake to reduce recoil of the rifle when it is fired. A tubular end plug/weight may be threaded into the end of the tubular weight remote from the muzzle end of the rifle to allow passage of a fired ballistic slug while also providing a deflector for concurrently discharging propellant gases. The plug/weight additionally provides a means for making major changes in the "effective weight" (an alternative designation of the position of the center of gravity of the rifle) applied to the muzzle end of the barrel. Plug/weights of varying size, weight and dimensions can be selected for use.
The shape and pattern of the ports and the shape of the deflecting surface of the plug/weight provide for gas escape to minimize recoil .[.without significant change in noise resulting from firing.].. Preferred constructions arrange the ports so that the propulsion gases escaping through adjacent ports mutually impinge.
Brief Description of the Drawings
In the drawings, which illustrate what is currently regarded as the best mode for carrying out the invention:
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a first preferred rifle barrel vibration dampener of the system of the invention, mounted on a rifle barrel that is shown fragmentarily:
FIG. 2 is a transverse sectional view taken through the dampener of FIG. 1 center line of the, but with the rifle barrel shown in elevation, for clarity;
FIG. 3 is a pictorial view of a series of six test targets as actually fired upon with a fixed rifle equipped without the vibration dampener of the invention and with the dampener on the rifle and adjusted to provide different location settings of the weight;
FIG. 4 is a view like that of FIG. 3, showing seven test targets fired upon with the same rifle but .[.and.]. using different ammunition than that of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a view like that of showing FIG. 2, but showing another preferred embodiment of the invention including a variable weight and a replaceable weight/plug that additionally functions as a muzzle brake;
FIG. 6 is a fragmentary perspective view of a presently preferred muzzle brake element; and
FIG. 7 is a fragmentary perspective view of a portion of a rifle .[.barrel .]. receiver mounted .[.to float.]. on a layer of bedding material.
FIG. 8 is an exemplary curve representative of transverse rifle barrel vibrations after firing of a bullet, plotted against time. .Iaddend .
Description of the Illustrated Embodiments
In the illustrated preferred embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2, the system of the invention includes a rifle barrel vibration dampener, shown generally at 10, threaded onto a rifle barrel 11. The barrel 11 is stepped down at a shoulder 12 to a threaded section 13 that terminates in a muzzle 14 having a distal end 15.
A lock nut 16 is threaded onto the section 13 and a skirt 18 of the lock nut extends therefrom to telescope around the barrel 11. The skirt 18 has an edge 19 and the skirt extends over the shoulder 12 so that edge 19 cooperates with a graduated linear scale 20 that has indices on the exterior surface of barrel 11. A linear scale 22 has indices in increments equally spaced around and marked on the skirt 18, adjacent to the bottom edge 19.
The relationship between the indices on the linear scale 20, the threads between barrel section 13 and lock nut 16 and the indices of the linear scale 22 are preferably selected such that turning of the lock nut to turn the skirt one full turn will move the skirt axially, with respect to the barrel, a distance equal to that between adjacent index markings along the linear scale 20.
A tubular weight 24 has one end interiorly threaded at 25, is telescoped over the distal end 14 and is threaded onto the threaded section 13 of the barrel to engage and to be tightly locked against lock nut 16. The weight 24 must be loosened before lock nut 16 can be turned to change the position of the lock nut relative to distal end 14 and must thereafter be tightened against the lock nut 16 to affix the position of the weight relative to the distal end.
To ensure a secure locking engagement between the thread section 13 of the rifle barrel 11, lock nut 16 and threads 25 of tubular weight 24 that will not release upon firing of the gun, a nylon strip 26 is inserted into a groove provided across the threads 13. Thus, when the lock nut and tubular weight are threaded onto the barrel the threads 13, 25 cut into and deform the nylon strip 26, wedging it between the threads to prevent undesired release of the tubular weight and lock nut from the barrel.
A typical target set of six targets 30-35, used for test firing of a particular rifle, in this case a 22-250 Browning A-Bolt, using Federal 40 grain ammunition, from a fixed location, is shown in FIG. 3. All firing was done at a range of 100 yards and in three round groups. The 0.922 inches shot group of target 30 was fired from the test rifle before the vibration dampener 10 was installed on the rifle.
The shot groups of test targets 31-35 were obtained using the same rifle with the vibration dampener 10 installed. The vibration dampener settings for each of the targets 31-35 were 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0 turns, respectively. The "sweet spot," for the rifle and ammunition tested was found to be at 6.0 turns, where a grouping of 0.214 inches was obtained.
The same Browning 22-250 A-Bolt rifle was fired in the same manner at another target set of seven targets 40-46, FIG. 4, using Winchester 52 grain ammunition. When the rifle was fired at the target 40, with the vibration dampener removed, a 1.55 inch shot group was obtained.
The shot groups of the targets 41-46 were obtained using the rifle with the vibration dampener 10 installed. The vibration dampener settings for each of the targets 41-46 were 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.0 turns, respectively. The "sweet spot" for the rifle and ammunition tested was found to be at 8.0 turns where a grouping of 0.396 inches was obtained.
In another test, a Browning A-Bolt , 30-06 caliber rifle was fired for accuracy at a range of 100 yards and a three round group of 1.349 inches was obtained using Winchester 150 grain ammunition. The rifle was thereafter fitted with the vibration dampener of the invention and fired, using the same ammunition at a series of targets, until the "sweet spot" was found to be at 5.0 turns, where a group of 0.680 inches was observed.
The same rifle, with the vibration dampener removed, was fired using Winchester 220 grain ammunition to obtain a 1.914 inches group. The vibration dampener was refitted and at the 5.0 turns position a group of 1.221 inches was obtained. The "sweet spot" with this ammunition was found to be at the 6.0 turns position, where a group of 0.388 inches was obtained.
Additional test were conducted with 7mm Remington Magnum, .223 Winchester, 30-06 Springfield, .338 Winchester Magnum and 2.70 Winchester calibers. The test results were consistent with those reported previously in this disclosure.
In FIG. 8 of the drawings, amplitude of transverse vibrational barrel travel is plotted on the Y-axis against time on the X-axis. It will be appreciated that the previously-referenced "sweet spots" determined during rifle test firing correspond to the anti-node (i.e., peaks and valleys that correspond to minimum barrel velocity) (peaks or valleys) N of the curve, wherein the amplitude of vibration (and hence transverse barrel position) .DELTA.d.sub.1 changes very little over time .DELTA.t.sub.1 as the bullet exits the barrel muzzle. In contrast, during exemplary time .DELTA.t.sub.2, which is equal to .DELTA.t.sub.1, it can be seen that the slope of the curve is extremely steep, indicative of relatively large and rapid transverse barrel movement .DELTA.t.sub.2 as the bullet exits the muzzle. Thus, bullet exit over a time period such as .DELTA.t.sub.2 impairs accuracy.
Another preferred embodiment for the vibration dampener of the system of the invention is shown generally at 50 in FIG. 5. The dampener 50 includes a rifle barrel 51, having a shoulder 52 and an exteriorly threaded portion 53 at the distal end 54 of the barrel.
A lock nut 55 is threaded onto the threaded portion 53 and includes a projecting skirt 56. As in the previously disclosed embodiment, a linear, graduated scale 57 is provided on the outer surface and extends along the length of the rifle barrel 51. The skirt 56 has an edge 58 and another linear, graduated scale 59 is provided on the skirt at the edge 58. Also, as in the previously disclosed embodiment, a preferred relationship between the linear scales, the threads on section 53 and the lock nut are such that one full rotation of the lock nut 55 and scale 59 will move the lock nut along the length of the rifle barrel for a distance equal to that between index marks of the scale 57. The edge 58 of the skirt 56 serves as an indicator cooperating with the scale 57 to indicate the number of turns made to position the nut 55 relative to the distal end 54 of the barrel 51.
A tubular weight element 60 has one end 61 interiorly threaded at 62 so that it can be threaded onto the threaded portion 53 of the barrel 51. The weight element 60 is eventually moved into locked engagement with a lock washer 63 that also engages the lock nut 55 to prevent undesired movement of the weight element 60 relative to the lock nut. The other end 64 of the weight element 60 is interiorly threaded to receive an exteriorly threaded boss 65 of a plug/weight 66. A lock washer 67 on the boss 65 engages the weight element 60 when the boss is fully inserted to prevent undesired movement of the plug/weight 66 relative to the weight element 60.
Nylon strips 71 corresponding to the nylon strip 26 previously described in connection with the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2 are also preferably inserted in grooves provided in the threads .[.62.]. 53 and the threads 65a of boss 65. The strips 71 function more securely to lock the locking nut 55 and tubular weight element 60 to the rifle barrel and the plug weight 66 to the tubular weight element 60.
Spaced apart ports 68 extend at ninety degrees with respect to the central axis of the rifle bore. Three rows of eight equally spaced ports 68 are provided through the wall of tubular weight element 60. An additional row of eight ports 69, each of which is directed away from the central axis of the rifle bore at a .[.thirty.]. sixty degree angle and extends, ID to OD, forwardly toward .[.from.]. the distal end 66a of the plug 66, is also provided through the wall of the element 60. The ports 68 and 69 allow propulsion gases to be discharged as a bullet is propelled through the barrel and out a bore 72 through the plug/weight 66.
The weight element 60 and plug/weight 66 thus additionally .[.acts.]. act as a muzzle brake for the rifle on which .[.it.]. the assembly is used, and .[.reduces.]. reduce recoil of the rifle when it is fired. The inserted end 65b of boss 65 helps divert through the ports 68 and 69 gases released upon firing of a bullet as the slug of the bullet travels through bore 72. The end 65b may be tapered, typically at a thirty degree angle with respect to the central axis of the bore 72 through the plug/weight 66.
Plug/weight 66 increases the overall weight applied to the end of barrel 51 and the plug/weight 66 can be interchanged with other similarly constructed plug/weights to vary the overall weight applied to the end of the barrel 51. It is therefore possible to provide for major weight changes, such as may be necessary as the vibration dampener 50 is used with rifles manufactured by different manufactures, different models of rifles, different caliber rifles, and different ammunitions.
Tests were conducted to determine the effectiveness of the ballistic optimizing system shown in FIG. 5 with a variety of production rifles. For data recording purposes, the test rifles were identified as:
The rifles were test fired as received from production and were then re-bedded and test fired after installation of the ballistic optimizing .[.sound suppressing.]. system (BOS).
The use of bedding has long been common and it is well recognized that proper bedding will increase the accuracy of a rifle. The rifle barrel .[.is.]. floats within the stock and extends from a receiver preferably mounted .[.to float.]. within a mounting well of the stock. The bedding is installed to fill the .[.floating.]. space between the .[.barrel.]. receiver and well. As so positioned, it functions as a shock absorber. "Bedding" refers to a shock absorbent or stabilizer material, which is usually a synthetic rubber or similarly resilient elastomeric material. In the case of the test rifles, a two part pourable liquid urethane rubber bedding compound supplied by Devcon Corporation of Danvers, .[.Main.]. Mass. under the tradename "FLEXANE 94" was used, as best illustrated by FIG. 7. The rubber bedding 80 between the .[.barrel.]. receiver 82 and the stock 84 enhanced the accuracy of the BOS system in the rifles tested.
The BOS was mounted to each test rifle after removal of two inches from the end of the respective barrels. The resulting configuration is shown in FIG. 5. The removal of the barrel end and addition of the BOS resulted in a net overall increase to each rifle of approximately one ounce in weight.
All test firing was performed at 100 yards. The rifles were .[.cooled.]. cleaned every nine rounds when fired with standard calibers and every six rounds when fired with magnum calibers. The results are set forth in TABLE I.
It was observed that a single full turn of the adjustable weight element 60 and thus also plug/weight 66 can cause a shot group to spread by as much as one inch, or more. In obtaining the data for TABLE I, the positions shot were at full turn markings on the scale 57 of the BOS. Microadjustments, less than one full turn, were not tested, but based on the test results obtained it is apparent that even tighter groups can be obtained after smaller incremental changes are made to the position of the adjustable weight element 60 and plug/weight 66.
A significant recoil reduction was obtained using the BOS. Time/force curves were generated for each rifle tested and peak recoil reduction percentages obtained are as set forth in TABLE II.
.[.As previously noted, most muzzle brakes heretofore available result in a very noticeable increase in noise and noise concussion to the marksman. TABLE III reports sound test results of rifles fired both with and without the BOS installed. Sound values are given in decibels. The noise meter used was placed identically with respect to the muzzle of each of the tested .[.TABLE III ______________________________________ SOUND TESTS Ri- No. BOS POSITION fle Caliber Ammo. System 0 5 10 ______________________________________ A 30-06 Win. 180 gr. 101.50 102.50 102.00 101.50 B .270 Win. Fed. P. 130 102.50 102.50 102.00 102.00 gr. C .300 Win. Rem. 180 gr. 102.00 103.75 102.00 103.50 Mag. D 7 mm Fed. 165 gr. 101.75 101.75 101.50 101.25 Rem. Mag. E 22-250 Rem. 55 gr. 101.00 101.50 100.75 101.50 F 338 Fed. 210 gr. 102.25 103.25 102.00 103.00 l Win. Mag. .]. ______________________________________
.[.From TABLE III it can be seen that only minor variations in sound volume occurred in test firings of the rifles without the BOS and the rifles after the BOS had been added. In the few instances where a slight increase in sound was measured, it was not discernable to the marksman..].
FIG. 6 illustrates a muzzle brake element 88 incorporating a preferred exhaust port arrangement which assures impingement of the emissions from aligned exhaust ports. The specifically illustrated pattern positions radial bores 90 in a first row and similar radial bores 92 in a second row, the two rows being approximately parallel with individual bores 90 radially offset, as shown, from individual bores 92. A third set of exhaust ports 94 is arranged in a third row approximately parallel the rows defined by bores 90 and 92, respectively. The individual ports 94 are aligned with respective individual bores 90 in a fashion which assures that the discharge from each port 94 impinges upon the discharge from the adjacent aligned-bore 90. As illustrated, the paired ports 94 and bores 90 are aligned parallel the axis 96. A fourth row of ports 98 is arranged in similar paired arrangement with respective bores 92. Thus, the discharges from respective ports 98 impinge upon the radial discharges from corresponding paired individual bores 92. The illustrated and equivalent arrangements provide good muzzle .[.break.]. brake characteristics .[.without an appreciable increase in discharge noise.]..
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been disclosed, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the appended claims, including reasonable equivalents.
Claims
No claims were provided in the source XML for this patent.
Patent Citations (62)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| USRe20958 | 1938-12-01 | White | |
| US592437 | 1897-10-01 | Oberhammer | |
| US1892522 | 1932-12-01 | White | |
| US1900790 | 1933-03-01 | Brandt | |
| US2153246 | 1939-04-01 | Gibson | |
| US2165457 | 1939-07-01 | Cutts, Jr. | |
| US2191484 | 1940-02-01 | Hughes | |
| US2302699 | 1942-11-01 | Klipsch | |
| US2340821 | 1944-02-01 | Russell | |
| US2372568 | 1945-03-01 | Grigg | |
| US2428232 | 1947-09-01 | Limon | |
| US2442899 | 1948-06-01 | McAllister | |
| US2453747 | 1948-11-01 | Egleson | |
| US2466104 | 1949-04-01 | Hilburn | |
| US2499428 | 1950-03-01 | Tiffany | |
| US2558200 | 1951-06-01 | Schmeling | |
| US2589738 | 1952-03-01 | Sedberry | |
| US2629958 | 1953-03-01 | Roper et al. | |
| US2656637 | 1953-10-01 | Richards | |
| US2662326 | 1953-12-01 | Powell | |
| US2668479 | 1954-02-01 | Batten | |
| US2712193 | 1955-07-01 | Mathis | |
| US2796005 | 1957-06-01 | Shapel | |
| US2809560 | 1957-10-01 | Matson et al. | |
| US2921396 | 1960-01-01 | Larson | |
| US2953972 | 1960-09-01 | Sorensen | |
| US3114289 | 1963-12-01 | Aulabaugh | |
| US3161979 | 1964-12-01 | Lowe | |
| US3164060 | 1965-01-01 | Dahl | |
| US3187633 | 1965-06-01 | Tanabe | |
| US3202056 | 1965-08-01 | Seeberger | |
| US3208348 | 1965-09-01 | Lee | |
| US3340641 | 1967-09-01 | Recker | |
| US3455203 | 1969-07-01 | Pillersdorf | |
| US3492750 | 1970-02-01 | Ashbrook et al. | |
| US3496667 | 1970-02-01 | Lowry | |
| US3604136 | 1971-09-01 | Edwards | |
| US3618245 | 1971-11-01 | Pruonto | |
| US3698747 | 1972-10-01 | Wing et al. | |
| US3714864 | 1973-02-01 | Thierry | |
| US3732778 | 1973-05-01 | Bettermann et al. | |
| US4341283 | 1982-07-01 | Mazzanti | |
| US4374484 | 1983-02-01 | Bekker et al. | |
| US4392413 | 1983-07-01 | Gwinn, Jr. | |
| US4510843 | 1985-04-01 | Rabatin | |
| US4558532 | 1985-12-01 | Wright | |
| US4635528 | 1987-01-01 | McQueen | |
| US4726280 | 1988-02-01 | Frye | |
| US4813333 | 1989-03-01 | Garris et al. | |
| US4869151 | 1989-09-01 | Chahin | |
| US4879942 | 1989-11-01 | Cave | |
| US4913031 | 1990-04-01 | Bossard et al. | |
| US4971208 | 1990-11-01 | Reinfried et al. | |
| US5058302 | 1991-10-01 | Minneman | |
| US5092223 | 1992-03-01 | Hudson | |
| US5105717 | 1992-04-01 | Pond | |
| US5119716 | 1992-06-01 | Bartolles | |
| US5173563 | 1992-12-01 | Gray | |
| CAX588100 | 1959-12-01 | ||
| DEX1075987 | 1960-02-01 | ||
| GBX127231 | 1919-11-01 | ||
| GBX594515 | 1947-11-01 |
Non-Patent Literature (37)
- Webster's II New Riversid University Dictionary, "tune", 1984, p. 1243.
- Petty, Charles E., "Bowling Pins and Beyond", American Rifleman, vol. 134, No. 3, Mar. 1986, pp. 29-31.
- D. S. Tanabe of Seattle, Washington, Contra-Jet Muzzle Brake Brochure, 1971.
- Precision Shooting Magazine, advertisement entitled "Accu-Brake SA," Nov. 1995.
- Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, College Edition, "firearm, gun, rifle", pp. 545, 646, 1253.
- Klipsch; "Tuning Up Small Bore Rifles"; The American Rifleman; Jun. 1939; pp. 7-9.
- Klipsch; "Tuning Up Small Bore Rifles, Some Further Progress", The American Rifleman; Dec. 1939; pp. 8-9.
- "Anschutz Model Supermatch 2013"; The American Rifleman; Dec. 1992; pp. 51-53.
- "The Recoil Robbers"; Field & Stream; May 1992; pp. 64-67.
- Hunnicutt; "Air-to-Air Combat"; The American Rifleman; Jan. 1989; pp. 38-43; 80.
- "Barrel Vibrations"; Reloading Handbook, 46th Ed.; (date unknown); pp. 136-137.
- Swenson; "Barrel Vibration & Behavior"; Precision Shooting; (prior art, date unknown); 2 pages.
- Dietz; "Making Varmit and Hunting Rifles Shoot Like Bench Rest Rifles or Varmit and Hunting Rifles that Shoot Like Bench Rest Guns"; Precision Shooting; Nov. 1985; pp. 14-19.
- "Accuracy Tuner"; p. 11 of unknown catalog; (date unknown).
- Luttmann; "Greater Shooting"; (date unknown); pp. 50-54.
- Grigg; "This Vibration Business"; Precision Shooting; (prior art, date unknown); 3 pages.
- Grigg; "Dynamics of the Bolt Action Rifle"; Precision Shooting; (prior art, date unknown); pp. 4-7.
- Grigg; "Bullet Fit and the Bernoulli Theorem"; Precision Shooting; (prior art, date unknown); 6 pages.
- Grigg; "Further `Vibration` Comment"; Precision Shooting; (prior art, date unknown); 1 page.
- "Sporter Rifles--Silhouette Rifles--Match Rifles--Pistols--Air Rifles", Anschutz Catalog (Precision Sales International, Inc.); 1989; (17 pages).
- Amber; "Chokes & Brakes"; Gun Digest; Dec. 1972; p.426.
- "The Muzzle Mizer"; (date unknown); 2 pages.
- Wilson; "The Accura Adjustable Muzzle Stabilizer"; (date unknown); 13 pages.
- Horowitz; "Barrel Stiffness"; Precision Shooting; Feb. 1976; pp. 8-9.
- Hollister; "Smallbore Notes"; Precision Shooting; Jun. 1970; p. 22.
- Pope; "The Real Movements of a Rifle in Firing"; Arms and the Man; Mar. 1914; pp. 4-5.
- Audette; "The Movements of a Rifle Barrel Prior to Bullet Exit"; Precision Shooting; (date unknown); pp. 4-7.
- Audette; "Barrel Vibration"; Precision Shooting; Dec. 1960; 4 pages.
- Audette; "Barrel Vibration"; Precision Shooting; (prior art, date unknown); 1 page.
- Audette; "Commentary"; Precision Shooting; Jun. 1984; pp. 5-11.
- "Damping Barrel Vibration"; Precision Shooting; (prior art, date unknown); 1 page.
- "Comments on Vibration"; Precision Shooting; (prior art, date unknown); 2 pages.
- Hall; "The Making of the One-Eighth Minute Rifle"; Precision Shooting; Dec. 1986; 1 page.
- Stekl; "Epoxy Barrel-Bedding Method"; Precision Shooting; Mar. 1974; pp. 16-18.
- Whelen; "Jump, Vibration and Barrel Weight"; Precision Shooting; (prior art, date unknown); 2 pages.
- Friesecke; "A Barrel Vibration Experiment"; Precision Shooting; (prior art, date unknown); 1 page.
- Hausmann et al, Physics, "Harmonic Motion", pp. 150-161. 1939.