US 9,823,958 B2Grant
System for processing data using different processing channels based on source error probability
Issue Date:2017-11-21
•20 Claims
•10 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
Systems, computer program products, and methods are described herein for routing data processing among different processing channels based on source-error probabilities. The present invention is configured to receive a data processing job comprising at least one data processing item; determine a first source of the at least one data processing item; determine a source error probability associated with the first source; and based on the determined source error probability, route the data processing item for data processing to an automated data processing network or a manual data processing network.
Metadata
Assignee
- Bank of America Corporation
Inventors
- Eric Dryer
- Erin Cassell
- Shawn Cart Gunsolley
Application Information
Application Number:US 15/018,296
Filing Date:2016-02-08
Priority Date:2016-02-08
Art Unit:2114
Classifications
IPC:
G06F11/00G06F11/07G06N7/00G06Q20/04
Patent Drawings (10 sheets)
Description
Background
[0001] Entities typically receive large volumes of documents from vendors, customers, or employees on any given day. Each document, especially if it is a financial instrument, is often reconciled with a batch of similar financial instruments for further processing. A financial instrument processing system may include many nodes or modules that are used to process a financial instrument including determining whether the instrument is an exception, which may mean the financial instrument includes an ambiguity or otherwise contains a problem needing remediation action.
Brief Summary
[0002] Embodiments of the present invention address the above needs and/or achieve other advantages by providing apparatuses (e.g., a system, computer program product and/or other devices) and methods for monitoring module or node usage in a data processing system.
[0003] In one aspect, a data processing system for routing data processing among different processing channels based on source-error probabilities is presented. The data processing system comprising: a memory device with computer-readable program code stored thereon; a communication device; a processing device operatively coupled to the memory device and the communication device, wherein the processing device is configured to execute the computer-readable program code to: receive a data processing job comprising at least one data processing item; determine a first source of the at least one data processing item; determine a source error probability associated with the first source; and based on the determined source error probability, route the data processing item for data processing to an automated data processing network or a manual data processing network.
[0004] In some embodiments, the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to: determine a second source of information associated with the data processing item; determine a source error probability associated with the second source; and based on the determined source error probabilities associated with both the first source and/or the second source, route or re-route the data processing item for data processing.
[0005] In some embodiments, the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to: determine a third source of information associated with the data processing item; determine a source error probability associated with the third source; and based on the determined source error probabilities associated with the first source, the second source and/or the third source, route or re-route the data processing item for data processing.
[0006] In some embodiments, the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to: route the data processing item to an automated data processing network; and in response, determine the second source.
[0007] In some embodiments, the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to: based on the source error probability of the second source, re-route the data processing item to a manual data processing network.
[0008] In some embodiments, the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to: based on the source error probability of the second source, re-route the data processing item to a second automatic data processing network; determine a third source of the at least one data processing item; determine a source error probability associated with the third source; and based on the determined source error probabilities associated with the third source, re-route or re-route the data processing item to a manual data processing network.
[0009] In some embodiments, the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to: combine the source error probabilities associated with each of the first source, second source and third source; compare the combined source error probabilities to a predetermined threshold; and in response, route the data processing item.
[0010] In some embodiments, the second source of information comprises financial institution backend information and the third source of information comprises customer information.
[0011] In some embodiments, the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to: determine a type associated with the first source; based on the type of the first source, determine a level of scrutiny for considering data processing items sourced from the first source; and based on the determined level of scrutiny, route the data processing item.
[0012] In some embodiments, the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to: determine at least one second source of information associated with the data processing item; compare information from the first source with the information from the second source; and in response, adjust the level of scrutiny lower if the information is the same and higher if the information is different.
[0013] In some embodiments, the at least one second source of information comprises a financial institution backend system and/or a customer information system.
[0014] In another aspect, a computer program product for routing data processing among different processing channels based on source-error probabilities is presented. The computer program product comprising at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer-readable program code portions embodied therein, the computer-readable program code portions comprising: an executable portion configured for receiving a data processing job comprising at least one data processing item; an executable portion configured for determining a first source of the at least one data processing item; an executable portion configured for determining a source error probability associated with the first source; and based on the determined source error probability, an executable portion configured for routing the data processing item for data processing to an automated data processing network or a manual data processing network.
[0015] In yet another aspect, a computer-implemented method for routing data processing among different processing channels based on source-error probabilities is presented. The method comprising: receiving, using a computing device processor, a data processing job comprising at least one data processing item; determining, using a computing device processor, a first source of the at least one data processing item; determining, using a computing device processor, a source error probability associated with the first source; and based on the determined source error probability, routing, using a computing device processor, the data processing item for data processing to an automated data processing network or a manual data processing network
[0016] The features, functions, and advantages that have been discussed may be achieved independently in various embodiments of the present invention or may be combined with yet other embodiments, further details of which can be seen with reference to the following description and drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0017] Having thus described embodiments of the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
[0018] FIG. 1 provides a dynamic resource management for document exception processing system environment, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;
[0019] FIG. 2A provides a high level process flow illustrating document exception identification and processing, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;
[0020] FIG. 2B provides a high level process flow illustrating general data lifting for document exception processing, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;
[0021] FIG. 3 provides a high level process flow illustrating identifying and extracting data from payment instruments, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;
[0022] FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary image of a financial record, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;
[0023] FIG. 5 provides an exemplary template of a financial record, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;
[0024] FIG. 6 provides a process flow illustrating exception processing, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;
[0025] FIG. 7 provides a process flow for routing data processing among different processing channels based on source-error probabilities, in accordance with an embodiment of an invention; and
[0026] FIG. 8 provides a process flow for routing data processing among different data processing channels based on secondary and tertiary information sources, in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Detailed Description of Embodiments of the Invention
[0027] Embodiments of the present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all, embodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to elements throughout. Where possible, any terms expressed in the singular form herein are meant to also include the plural form and vice versa, unless explicitly stated otherwise. As used herein, a “document,” “financial document,” “financial record,” or “payment instrument” may also refer to a myriad of financial documents, including but not limited to a lease document, a mortgage document, a deposit slip, a payment coupon, a receipt, general ledger tickets, or the like. In some embodiments, “document”, “financial record” may exist as a physical item printed on paper or other medium. In other embodiments, the check may exist electronically. Furthermore, “document,” “financial document,” “financial record,” or “payment instrument” may also refer to records associated with government data, legal data, identification data, and the like. Although the disclosure is directed to financial records, it will be understood that non-financial records such as social communications, advertising, blogs, opinion writing, and the like may also be applicable to the disclosure presented herein. In cases were non-financial records are use, it will be understood that personal information, such personal identifying information, account numbers, and the like, can be removed from the documents before they are released. For example, if a coupon or product review is to be used in advertising, personal information associated with such records will be removed before the advertising is presented to the public. The data of the financial records or non-financial records may be provided in a wide variety formats including, paper records, electronic or digital records, video records, audio records, and/or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the “document” or “financial record” may be referred to in examples as a check or the like. Furthermore, the term “image lift data” or “data lift” may refer to the process of lifting one or more areas/elements of a document and storing those areas as metadata without storing the entire document as an image file.
[0028] Some portions of this disclosure are written in terms of a financial institution's unique position with respect document processing and retrieving. As such, a financial institution may be able to utilize its unique position to receive, store, process, and retrieve images of documents, such as those of a financial nature.
[0029] As presented herein, embodiments that detect and extract specific data from images and that analyze, process, and distribute extracted metadata are provided.
[0030] FIG. 1 illustrates a dynamic resource management for document exception processing system environment 200, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. The environment 200 includes a check deposit device 211 associated or used with authorization of a user 210 (e.g., an account holder, a mobile application user, an image owner, a bank customer, and the like), a third party system 260, and a financial institution system 240. In some embodiments, the third party system 260 corresponds to a third party financial institution. The environment 200 further includes one or more third party systems 292 (e.g., a partner, agent, or contractor associated with a financial institution), one or more other financial institution systems 294 (e.g., a credit bureau, third party banks, and so forth), and one or more external systems 296.
[0031] The systems and devices communicate with one another over the network 230 and perform one or more of the various steps and/or methods according to embodiments of the disclosure discussed herein. The network 230 may include a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), and/or a global area network (GAN). The network 230 may provide for wireline, wireless, or a combination of wireline and wireless communication between devices in the network. In one embodiment, the network 230 includes the Internet.
[0032] The check deposit device 211, the third party system 260, and the financial institution system 240 each includes a computer system, server, multiple computer systems and/or servers or the like. The financial institution system 240, in the embodiments shown has a communication device 242 communicably coupled with a processing device 244, which is also communicably coupled with a memory device 246. The processing device 244 is configured to control the communication device 242 such that the financial institution system 240 communicates across the network 230 with one or more other systems. The processing device 244 is also configured to access the memory device 246 in order to read the computer readable instructions 248, which in some embodiments includes a one or more OCR engine applications 250 and a client keying application 251. The memory device 246 also includes a datastore 254 or database for storing pieces of data that can be accessed by the processing device 244. In some embodiments, the datastore 254 includes a check data repository.
[0033] As used herein, a “processing device,” generally refers to a device or combination of devices having circuitry used for implementing the communication and/or logic functions of a particular system. For example, a processing device may include a digital signal processor device, a microprocessor device, and various analog-to-digital converters, digital-to-analog converters, and other support circuits and/or combinations of the foregoing. Control and signal processing functions of the system are allocated between these processing devices according to their respective capabilities. The processing device 214, 244, or 264 may further include functionality to operate one or more software programs based on computer-executable program code thereof, which may be stored in a memory. As the phrase is used herein, a processing device 214, 244, or 264 may be “configured to” perform a certain function in a variety of ways, including, for example, by having one or more general-purpose circuits perform the function by executing particular computer-executable program code embodied in computer-readable medium, and/or by having one or more application-specific circuits perform the function.
[0034] Furthermore, as used herein, a “memory device” generally refers to a device or combination of devices that store one or more forms of computer-readable media and/or computer-executable program code/instructions. Computer-readable media is defined in greater detail below. For example, in one embodiment, the memory device 246 includes any computer memory that provides an actual or virtual space to temporarily or permanently store data and/or commands provided to the processing device 244 when it carries out its functions described herein.
[0035] The check deposit device 211 includes a communication device 212 and an image capture device 215 (e.g., a camera) communicably coupled with a processing device 214, which is also communicably coupled with a memory device 216. The processing device 214 is configured to control the communication device 212 such that the check deposit device 211 communicates across the network 230 with one or more other systems. The processing device 214 is also configured to access the memory device 216 in order to read the computer readable instructions 218, which in some embodiments includes a capture application 220 and an online banking application 221. The memory device 216 also includes a datastore 222 or database for storing pieces of data that can be accessed by the processing device 214. The check deposit device 211 may be a mobile device of the user 210, a bank teller device, a third party device, an automated teller machine, a video teller machine, or another device capable of capturing a check image.
[0036] The third party system 260 includes a communication device 262 and an image capture device (not shown) communicably coupled with a processing device 264, which is also communicably coupled with a memory device 266. The processing device 264 is configured to control the communication device 262 such that the third party system 260 communicates across the network 230 with one or more other systems. The processing device 264 is also configured to access the memory device 266 in order to read the computer readable instructions 268, which in some embodiments includes a transaction application 270. The memory device 266 also includes a datastore 272 or database for storing pieces of data that can be accessed by the processing device 264.
[0037] In some embodiments, the capture application 220, the online banking application 221, and the transaction application 270 interact with the OCR engines 250 to receive or provide financial record images and data, detect and extract financial record data from financial record images, analyze financial record data, and implement business strategies, transactions, and processes. The OCR engines 250 and the client keying application 251 may be a suite of applications for conducting OCR.
[0038] In some embodiments, the capture application 220, the online banking application 221, and the transaction application 270 interact with the OCR engines 250 to utilize the extracted metadata to determine decisions for exception processing. In this way, the system may systematically resolve exceptions. The exceptions may include one or more irregularities such as bad micro line reads, outdated check stock, or misrepresentative checks that may result in a failure to match the check to an associated account for processing. As such, the system may identify the exception and code it for exception processing. Furthermore, the system may utilize the metadata to match the check to a particular account automatically.
[0039] In some embodiments, the capture application 220, the online banking application 221, and the transaction application 270 interact with the OCR engines 250 to utilize the extracted metadata for automated payment stops when detecting a suspect document or time during processing. In this way, the system may identify suspect items within the extracted metadata. The document or check processing may be stopped because of this identification. In some embodiments, the suspect items may be detected utilizing OCR based on data received from a customer external to the document in comparison to the document. In some embodiments, the suspect items may be detected utilizing OCR based on data associated with the account in comparison to the document.
[0040] In some embodiments, the capture application 220, the online banking application 221, and the transaction application 270 interact with the OCR engines 250 to utilize the extracted metadata for automated decisions for detecting and/or eliminating duplicate check processing. Duplicate checks may be detected and/or eliminated based on metadata matching. In this way, data may be lifted off of a document as metadata and compare the data to other documents utilizing the metadata form. As such, the system does not have to overlay images in order to detect duplicate documents.
[0041] The applications 220, 221, 250, 251, and 270 are for instructing the processing devices 214, 244 and 264 to perform various steps of the methods discussed herein, and/or other steps and/or similar steps. In various embodiments, one or more of the applications 220, 221, 250, 251, and 270 are included in the computer readable instructions stored in a memory device of one or more systems or devices other than the systems 260 and 240 and the check deposit device 211. For example, in some embodiments, the application 220 is stored and configured for being accessed by a processing device of one or more third party systems 292 connected to the network 230. In various embodiments, the applications 220, 221, 250, 251, and 270 stored and executed by different systems/devices are different. In some embodiments, the applications 220, 221, 250, 251, and 270 stored and executed by different systems may be similar and may be configured to communicate with one another, and in some embodiments, the applications 220, 221, 250, 251, and 270 may be considered to be working together as a singular application despite being stored and executed on different systems.
[0042] In various embodiments, one of the systems discussed above, such as the financial institution system 240, is more than one system and the various components of the system are not collocated, and in various embodiments, there are multiple components performing the functions indicated herein as a single device. For example, in one embodiment, multiple processing devices perform the functions of the processing device 244 of the financial institution system 240 described herein. In various embodiments, the financial institution system 240 includes one or more of the external systems 296 and/or any other system or component used in conjunction with or to perform any of the method steps discussed herein. For example, the financial institution system 240 may include a financial institution system, a credit agency system, and the like.
[0043] In various embodiments, the financial institution system 240, the third party system 260, and the check deposit device 211 and/or other systems may perform all or part of a one or more method steps discussed above and/or other method steps in association with the method steps discussed above. Furthermore, some or all the systems/devices discussed here, in association with other systems or without association with other systems, in association with steps being performed manually or without steps being performed manually, may perform one or more of the steps of method 300, the other methods discussed below, or other methods, processes or steps discussed herein or not discussed herein.
[0044] Referring now to FIG. 2A , FIG. 2A presents provides a high level process flow illustrating document exception identification and processing 150, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. As illustrated in block 120, the method comprises receiving an image of a check. The image received may be one or more of a check, other document, payment instrument, and/or financial record. In some embodiments, the image of the check may be received by a specialized apparatus associated with the financial institution (e.g. a computer system) via a communicable link to a user's mobile device, a camera, an Automated Teller Machine (ATM) at one of the entity's facilities, a second apparatus at a teller's station, another financial institution, or the like. In other embodiments, the apparatus may be specially configured to capture the image of the check for storage and exception processing.
[0045] As illustrated in block 122, the system may then lift data off of the check (document, payment instrument, or financial record) using optical character recognition (OCR). The OCR processes enables the system to convert text and other symbols in the check images to other formats such as text files and/or metadata, which can then be used and incorporated into a variety of applications, documents, and processes. In some embodiments, OCR based algorithms used in the OCR processes incorporate pattern matching techniques. For example, each character in an imaged word, phrase, code, or string of alphanumeric text can be evaluated on a pixel-by-pixel basis and matched to a stored character. Various algorithms may be repeatedly applied to determine the best match between the image and stored characters.
[0046] After the successful retrieval or capture of the image of the check, the apparatus may process the check as illustrated in block 126. The apparatus may capture individual pieces of check information from the image of the check in metadata form. In some embodiments, the check information may be text. In other embodiments, the check information may be an image processed into a compatible data format.
[0047] As illustrated in block 124, the method comprises storing check information. After the image of the check is processed, the apparatus may store the lifted and collected check information in a compatible data format. In some embodiments, the check information may be stored as metadata. As such, individual elements of the check information may be stored separately, and may be associated with each other via metadata. In some embodiments, the individual pieces of check information may be stored together. In some embodiments, the apparatus may additionally store the original image of the check immediately after the image of the check is received.
[0048] As illustrated in block 128, the process 150 continues by identifying exceptions in the document processing. Exceptions may be one or more of irregularities such as bad micro line reads, outdated document stock, misrepresented items, or the like that result in a failure to match the document to an account. In some embodiments, the process may also detect duplicate documents. In yet other embodiments, the system may identify payment stops for specific documents.
[0049] Next, as illustrated in block 130, the process 150 continues to batch exceptions for processing and quieting them for resource review. In some embodiments, the system may first provide automated decisions for exception processing utilizing the lifted data. In this way, the system may utilize the data lifted from the document in order to rectify the exception identified in block 128. In this way, the system may be able to rectify the exception without having to have an individual manually override the exception and identify the account associated with the document with the exception. In some embodiments, a confidence of the automated decisions for exception processing may be generated. Upon a low confidence or that below a threshold such as 100%, 95%, or 90%, the system may queue the exception to a work flow node for payment instrument processing by a resource. The queue of the resource may be determined based on dynamic resource management described below.
[0050] Referring now to FIG. 2B , FIG. 2B presents provides a high level process flow illustrating general data lifting for document exception processing 160, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. As illustrated in block 132, the process 160 starts by identifying the exceptions in financial document or payment instrument processing. Once identified, the documents associated with each of the one or more exceptions may be categorized as either debit or credit documents, as illustrated in block 134. In this way, the system may identify an exception and identify the type of document that the exception was identified from.
[0051] Next, as illustrate in decision block 136, the system may identify if the document is a check or if it is another financial document or payment instrument for processing. If the financial document is a check in decision block 136, the system will identify if the check is a pre-authorized draft check, as illustrated in block 138. In some embodiments, pre-authorized draft checks are made via online purchases that ask a user for his/her check number and routing number. The pre-authorized draft check is subsequently converted to paper form and submitted to the financial institution for processing. These pre-authorized draft checks may undergo a higher level of processing scrutiny to ensure authenticity, if necessary.
[0052] Next, as illustrated in block 140, automated decisions are created for the financial documents with exceptions based on lifted data and the type of exception identified. Once automated decisions are made, the system identifies a confidence of the automated decision.
[0053] In some embodiments, the system may send the exceptions for processing to a work flow node for exception processing by a resource, as illustrated in block 150. In yet other embodiments, the resource may receive an already automatically processed exception to confirm the correct processing.
[0054] Referring now to FIG. 3 , FIG. 3 provides a high level process flow illustrating identifying and extracting data from payment instruments 100, in accordance with some embodiments in the invention. One or more devices, such as the one or more systems and/or one or more computing devices and/or servers of FIG. 3 can be configured to perform one or more steps of the process 100 or other processes described below. In some embodiments, the one or more devices performing the steps are associated with a financial institution. In other embodiments, the one or more devices performing the steps are associated with a merchant, business, partner, third party, credit agency, account holder, and/or user.
[0055] As illustrated at block 102, one or more check images are received. The check images comprise the front portion of a check, the back portion of a check, or any other portions of a check. In cases where there are several checks piled into a stack, the multiple check images may include, for example, at least a portion of each of the four sides of the check stack. In this way, any text, numbers, or other data provided on any side of the check stack may also be used in implementing the process 100. In some embodiments the system may receive financial documents, payment instruments, checks, or the likes.
[0056] In some embodiments, each of the check images comprises financial record data. The financial record data includes dates financial records are issued, terms of the financial record, time period that the financial record is in effect, identification of parties associated with the financial record, payee information, payor information, obligations of parties to a contract, purchase amount, loan amount, consideration for a contract, representations and warranties, product return policies, product descriptions, check numbers, document identifiers, account numbers, merchant codes, file identifiers, source identifiers, and the like.
[0057] Although check images are illustrated in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5 , it will be understood that any type of financial record image may be received. Exemplary check images include PDF files, scanned documents, digital photographs, and the like. At least a portion of each of the check images, in some embodiments, is received from a financial institution, a merchant, a signatory of the financial record (e.g., the entity having authority to endorse or issue a financial record), and/or a party to a financial record. In other embodiments, the check images are received from image owners, account holders, agents of account holders, family members of account holders, financial institution customers, payors, payees, third parties, and the like. In some embodiments, the source of at least one of the checks includes an authorized source such as an account holder or a third party financial institution. In other embodiments, the source of at least one of the checks includes an unauthorized source such as an entity that intentionally or unintentionally deposits or provides a check image to the system of process 100.
[0058] In some exemplary embodiments, a customer or other entity takes a picture of a check at a point of sales or an automated teller machine (ATM) and communicates the resulting check image to a point of sales device or ATM via wireless technologies, near field communication (NFC), radio frequency identification (RFID), and other technologies. In other examples, the customer uploads or otherwise sends the check image to the system of process 100 via email, short messaging service (SMS) text, a web portal, online account, mobile applications, and the like. For example, the customer may upload a check image to deposit funds into an account or pay a bill via a mobile banking application using a capture device. The capture device can include any type or number of devices for capturing images or converting a check to any type of electronic format such as a camera, personal computer, laptop, notebook, scanner, mobile device, and/or other device.
[0059] As illustrated at block 104, optical character recognition (OCR) processes are applied to at least a portion of the check images. At least one OCR process may be applied to each of the check images or some of the check images. The OCR processes enables the system to convert text and other symbols in the check images to other formats such as text files and/or metadata, which can then be used and incorporated into a variety of applications, documents, and processes. In some embodiments, OCR based algorithms used in the OCR processes incorporate pattern matching techniques. For example, each character in an imaged word, phrase, code, or string of alphanumeric text can be evaluated on a pixel-by-pixel basis and matched to a stored character. Various algorithms may be repeatedly applied to determine the best match between the image and stored characters.
[0060] As illustrated in block 106, the check data may be identified based on the applied OCR processing. In some embodiments, the OCR process includes location fields for determining the position of data on the check image. Based on the position of the data, the system can identify the type of data in the location fields to aid in character recognition. For example, an OCR engine may determine that text identified in the upper right portion of a check image corresponds to a check number. The location fields can be defined using any number of techniques. In some embodiments, the location fields are defined using heuristics. The heuristics may be embodied in rules that are applied by the system for determining approximate location.
[0061] In other embodiments, the system executing process flow 100 defines the location fields by separating the portions and/or elements of the image of the check into quadrants. As referred to herein, the term quadrant is used broadly to describe the process of differentiating elements of a check image by separating portions and/or elements of the image of the check into sectors in order to define the location fields. These sectors may be identified using a two-dimensional coordinate system or any other system that can be used for determining the location of the sectors. In many instances, each sector will be rectangular in shape. In some embodiments, the system identifies each portion of the image of the check using a plurality of quadrants. In such an embodiment, the system may further analyze each quadrant using the OCR algorithms in order to determine whether each quadrant has valuable or useful information. Generally, valuable or useful information may relate to any data or information that may be used for processing and/or settlement of the check, used for identifying the check, and the like. Once the system determines the quadrants of the image of the check having valuable and/or useful information, the system can extract the identified quadrants together with the information from the image of the check for storage. The quadrants may be extracted as metadata, text, or code representing the contents of the quadrant. In some embodiments, the quadrants of the image of the check that are not identified as having valuable and/or useful information are not extracted from the image.
[0062] In additional embodiments, the system uses a grid system to identify non-data and data elements of a check image. The grid system may be similar to the quadrant system. Using the grid system, the system identifies the position of each grid element using a coordinate system (e.g., x and y coordinates or x, y, and z coordinate system or the like) or similar system for identifying the spatial location of a grid element on a check. In practice, the spatial location of a grid element may be appended to or some manner related to grid elements with check data. For example, using the grid, the system may identify which grid elements of the grid contain data elements, such as check amount and payee name, and either at the time of image capture or extraction of the check image within the grid, the system can tag the grid element having the check data element with the grid element's spatial location. In some embodiments, the grid system and/or quadrant system is based on stock check templates obtained from check manufacturers or merchants.
[0063] In alternative or additional embodiments, the OCR process includes predefined fields to identify data. The predefined field includes one or more characters, words, or phrases that indicate a type of data. In such embodiments, the system of process 100 extracts all the data presented in the check image regardless of the location of the data and uses the predefined fields to aid in character recognition. For example, a predefined field containing the phrase “Pay to the order of” may be used to determine that data following the predefined field relates to payee information.
[0064] In addition to OCR processes, the system of process 100 can use other techniques such as image overlay to locate, identify, and extract data from the check images. In other embodiments, the system uses the magnetic ink character recognition (MICR) to determine the position of non-data (e.g., white space) and data elements on a check image. For example, the MICR of a check may indicate to the system that the received or captured check image is a business check with certain dimensions and also, detailing the location of data elements, such as the check amount box or Payee line. In such an instance, once the positions of this information is made available to the system, the system will know to capture any data elements to the right or to the left of the identified locations or include the identified data element in the capture. This system may choose to capture the data elements of a check in any manner using the information determined from the MICR number of the check.
[0065] As illustrated at block 108, unrecognized data from the check images is detected. In some embodiments, the unrecognized data includes characters, text, shading, or any other data not identified by the OCR processes. In such embodiments, the unrecognized data is detected following implementation of at least one of the OCR processes. In other embodiments, the unrecognized data is detected prior to application of the OCR processes. For example, the unrecognized data may be removed and separated from the check images or otherwise not subjected to the OCR processes. In one exemplary situation, the system may determine that handwritten portions of a check image should not undergo OCR processing due to the difficulty in identifying such handwritten portions. Exemplary unrecognized data includes handwritten text, blurred text, faded text, misaligned text, misspelled data, any data not recognized by the OCR processes or other data recognition techniques, and the like. In other cases, at least a portion of some or all of the check images may undergo pre-processing to enhance or correct the unrecognized data. For example, if the text of a check image is misaligned or blurry, the system may correct that portion of the check image before applying the OCR processes to increase the probability of successful text recognition in the OCR processes or other image processes.
[0066] As illustrated at block 110, in some embodiments the system will have one or more resources review the unrecognized data. As such, there may be one or more individuals reviewing the unrecognized data instead of mechanically reviewing the data. As illustrated in block 110, the system may receive input from the resource that provides information identifying the unrecognized data. As such, a resource may be provided with the portions of a check image corresponding to the unrecognized data. The resource can view the unrecognized data to translate the unrecognized data into text and input the translation into a check data repository. In this way, the system “learns” to recognize previously unrecognized data identified by the resource, such that when the system reviews the same or similar unrecognized data in the future, such data can be easily identified by reference to the check data repository.
[0067] In other embodiments, the system may present an online banking customer with the unrecognized data to solicit input directly from the customer. For example, the customer may be presented with operator-defined terms of previously unrecognized data to verify if such terms are correct. The system may solicit corrective input from the customer via an online banking portal, a mobile banking application, and the like. If an operator or resource initially determines that the handwriting on the memo line reads “house flaps,” the customer may subsequently correct the operator's definition and update the check data repository so that the handwritten portion correctly corresponds to “mouse traps.” In some embodiments, the customer's input is stored in a customer input repository, which is linked to the check data repository associated with the OCR processes. For example, the system can create a file path linking the customer input repository with the check data repository to automatically update the check data repository with the customer input. In other embodiments, the check data repository and/or customer input repository includes stored customer data or account data. Stored customer signatures, for example, may be included in the check data repository and/or customer input repository.
[0068] As illustrated at block 111, the process 100 continues by determining, based on the confidence level of the resource and initial unrecognized data, determine if a secondary check of the unrecognized data is necessary. As such, based on a confidence level determined from the resource, the system may require additional checking to confirm the accuracy of the identification of the unrecognized data from the check.
[0069] Finally, as illustrated in block 112, business strategies and transactions are processed based on at least one of the check data and the inputted information. Data extracted from the check images using the process 100 may be used to automate or enhance various processes such as remediating exception processes, replacing check images with check data in online statements, enforcing requirements regarding third party check deposits, facilitating check to automated clearing house transaction conversion, cross selling products, and so forth.
[0070] FIG. 4 provides an illustration of an exemplary image of a financial record 300, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The financial record illustrated in FIG. 4 is a check. However, one will appreciate that any financial record, financial document, payment instrument, or the like may be provided.
[0071] The image of check 300 may comprise an image of the entire check, a thumbnail version of the image of the check, individual pieces of check information, all or some portion of the front of the check, all or some portion of the back of the check, or the like. Check 300 comprises check information, wherein the check information comprises contact information 305, the payee 310, the memo description 315, the account number and routing number 320 associated with the appropriate user or customer account, the date 325, the check number 330, the amount of the check 335, the signature 340, or the like. In some embodiments, the check information may comprise text. In other embodiments, the check information may comprise an image. A capture device may capture an image of the check 300 and transmit the image to a system of a financial institution via a network. The system may collect the check information from the image of the check 300 and store the check information in a datastore as metadata. In some embodiments, the pieces of check information may be stored in the datastore individually. In other embodiments, multiple pieces of check information may be stored in the datastore together.
[0072] FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary template of a financial record 400, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Again, the financial record illustrated in FIG. 5 is a check. However, one will appreciate that any financial record, financial document, payment instruments, or the like may be provided.
[0073] In the illustrated embodiment, the check template 400 corresponds to the entire front portion of a check, but it will be understood that the check template 400 may also correspond to individual pieces of check information, portions of a check, or the like. The check template, in some embodiments, includes the format of certain types of checks associated with a bank, a merchant, an account holder, types of checks, style of checks, check manufacturer, and so forth. By using the check template, the system may “learn” to map the key attributes of the check for faster and more accurate processing. In some embodiments, financial records are categorized by template. The check template 400 is only an exemplary template for a financial record, and other check templates or other financial record templates may be utilized to categorize checks or other financial records. The check template 400 can be used in the OCR processes, image overlay techniques, and the like.
[0074] The check template 400 comprises check information, wherein the check information includes, for example, a contact information field 405, a payee line field 410, a memo description field 415, an account number and routing number field 420 associated with the appropriate user or customer account, a date line field 425, a check number field 430, an amount box field 435, a signature line field 440, or the like.
[0075] FIG. 6 illustrates a process flow for exception processing 500, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. As illustrated in block 502, the process 500 is initiated when financial documents or payment instruments, such as checks, are received. The received financial document may be in various forms, such as in an image format. Processing of the document may proceed wherein the data from the document may be collected and lifted from the document as metadata. This metadata is lifted from the document utilizing optical character recognition (OCR). The OCR processes enables the system to convert text and other symbols in the document image to metadata, which can then be used and incorporated into exception processing. In some embodiments, OCR based algorithms used in the OCR processes incorporate pattern matching techniques. For example, each character in an imaged word, phrase, code, or string of alphanumeric text can be evaluated on a pixel-by-pixel basis and matched to a stored character. Various algorithms may be repeatedly applied to determine the best match between the image and stored characters.
[0076] Once the metadata is lifted from the document as illustrated in block 502, the process 500 continues to compile and store the metadata associated with the received financial documents, as illustrated in block 504. As such, after the image of the document, such as a check, is processed, the system may compile and store the lifted and collected check information as metadata. As such, individual elements of the check information may be stored separately, together, or the like. In this way, the system stores the type of document, the appearance of the document, the information on the document, such as numbers, accounts, dates, names, addresses, payee, payor, routing numbers, amounts, document backgrounds, or the like as metadata.
[0077] In some embodiments, the stored data may be structural metadata. As such, the data may be about the design and specification of the structure of the data. In other embodiments, the data may be descriptive metadata. As such, the data may be data describing in detail the content of the financial record or document. In some embodiments, the metadata as described herein may take the form of structural, descriptive and/or a combination thereof.
[0078] Next, as illustrated in decision block 506, the system monitors the received documents to identify exceptions in the document processing. Exceptions may be one or more of irregularities such as bad micro line reads, outdated document stock, misrepresented items, or the like that result in a failure to match the document to an account intended to be associated with that document. If no exception is identified, then the process 500 terminates.
[0079] As illustrated in block 507 the process 500 continues to identify and categorize any identified exceptions into financial documents associated with debits or financial documents associated with credits. As illustrated in block 508 the process 500 continues to confirm the irregularity in the financial document that lead to the exception identification in decision block 506. The irregularity that lead to the exception may be one or more of a bad micro line read, outdated documents (such as an outdated check or deposit statement), or a general failure of the document to match an existing financial account.
[0080] Next, as illustrated in block 510, the process 500 continues to utilize the metadata associated with the received financial documents to systematically search for exception resolutions. As such, providing automated decisions for exception processing utilizing the lifted metadata. As such, the metadata lifted from the financial documents may be utilized to search the accounts or other records at the financial institution to determine the correct account or record associated with the exception document. For example, the exception may include an outdated check. In this way, one or more of the routing numbers, account numbers, or the like may be incorrectly stated on the check. The system will take the data on that outdated check and convert it to a metadata format. Thus, the system will utilize the metadata format of the routing number or the like to search the financial institution records to identify that that particular routing number was used for a batch of checks for User 1. As such, the system will identify the correct user, User 1 associated with the check that had an exception. Other examples may include one or more of bad micro line reads, document or check format issues, or the like.
[0081] As such, the system may utilize the metadata lifted from the document in order to rectify the exception identified in decision block 506. In this way, the system may be able to rectify the exception without having to have an individual manually override the exception and identify the account associated with the document with the exception.
[0082] Next, as illustrated in block 512, the process 500 continues by determining a confidence associated with the systematic resolution for exception resolution. In this way, a confidence of the automated resolution is determined. If the confidence is not satisfactory, such as not being above a pre-determined threshold, the system may send the exception to a resource based on the confidence score not reaching a pre-determined threshold, as illustrated in block 518. Next, as illustrated in block 520, the system pay place the resolved exception into financial document processing after resolution and confirmation from the resource.
[0083] Referring back to block 512 of FIG. 6 , if a confidence is generated significantly high enough to reach the pre-determined threshold, the system continues and automatically and systematically corrects the exception based on the match based on the confident systematic resolution, as illustrated in block 514. In some embodiments, there may be one or more threshold confidences related to the exception. As such, if a match has been made between the metadata and a financial account and it is above a pre-determined confidence, then the system may automatically correct the exception. However, in some embodiments, the system may request manual acceptance of the correction of the exception.
[0084] Finally, as illustrated in block 516, the corrected financial document may be placed back into the financial document processing for continued processing after the exception has been identified and corrected via systematic searching financial institution data utilizing metadata extracted from the original financial document with an exception.
[0085] FIG. 7 illustrates a process flow for routing data processing among different processing channels based on source-error probabilities 700, in accordance with an embodiment of an invention. Automated check processing is increasingly replacing manual check processing. With automatic text recognition, checks can be processed entirely by machine, improving the efficiency of banking. Automated processing is also a cost-cutting tool for banks, and a convenient shortcut for customers who can quickly deposit checks using a machine. However, automated processing has its own set of disadvantages, the most important of which is dealing with error probability associated with the automated process. Typically, most automated processes are implemented after cost profile analysis which discusses pertinent issues associated with the automation process, including but not limited to, the costs, risks, rewards, and/or the like. In the realm of financial institution network services, the automation of check processing requires tedious analysis since check processing errors may have serious repercussions. The present invention provides the functional benefit of using a variable confidence level analysis to determine a level of scrutiny associated with the processing of the check to determine whether a check can continue to be processed using the automated process or requires manual intervention.
[0086] As shown in block 702, the process flow includes receiving a data processing job including at least one processing item. Typically the processing item is associated with the financial institution, i.e. the financial document. In some embodiments, the processing item may be a check. In this aspect, the processing item may be a physical paper check, a scanned image of the check, a set of information extracted from the scanned image of the check, and/or the like. In some embodiments, the set of information extracted from the check image may include but is not limited to a payee, a payor, a date, a memo line data, a payment amount, a check number, and endorsement, a signature, and/or the like. Typically, the information extracted from the scanned image of the check may be used in processing the check, i.e., multiple funds have been transferred from a payor's account and debited into a payee's account.
[0087] Next, as shown in block 704, the process flow includes determining a first source of the data processing item. In one aspect, the first source associated with the data processing item may include but is not limited to, a transaction terminal associated with the financial institution (e.g. an ATM), a point of sale terminal associated with the merchant, a transaction terminal associated with a third-party, a user device capable and authorized to accept the data processing item, and/or the like. In embodiments where the first source is capable of scanning the data processing item, the first source may also refer to information associated with a scanner involved in the capturing of the check image. In some embodiments, information associated with the scanner may include but is not limited to, a type of scanner such as a high-speed check scanner or single fee check scanner, a type of handwriting recognition software (e.g. magnetic ink character recognition) used to scan the check, a make and model of the check scanner, and/or the like. In further embodiments, the system may be configured to determine quality of the check image including determining the resolution at which the check was scanned (e.g., 100 ppi, 200 ppi, 300 ppi, or the like), an image format associated with the check image (e.g., JPEG, TIFF, or the like), an image type (e.g., black and white, grayscale, or the like), a communication standard used in the electronic exchange of check images (e.g., X9.37), and/or the like.
[0088] For example, the first source may refer to both the ATM used by the customer to deposit the check and/or the information associated with the scanner installed within the ATM and configured to capture an image of the check for processing. In another example, the first source may refer to the mobile device used by the customer to capture an image of the check, information associated with a software installed on the mobile device used to capture the image of the check, and information associated with the image capturing component associated with the mobile device used to capture the image of the check. In this way, the system may be configured to determine information associated with any hardware and/or software component used in receiving the data processing item. In some embodiments, the system may be configured to determine information associated with one or more communication channels involved in the transmission and reception of the data processing item. In some other embodiments, the system may be configured to determine information associated with any intermediate entity associated with the transmission and reception of the data processing item.
[0089] Next, as shown in block 706, the process flow includes determining a source error probability associated with the first source. In this regard, the system may be configured to determine an error margin associated with the first source indicating a frequency associated with which the data processing item is mishandled. In some embodiments, the error probability associated with the first source may indicate the reliability of the first source to capture information associated with a data processing item and transmit the captured information successfully for further processing. In some embodiments, the system may be configured to implement a level of scrutiny when processing the data processing item. In this regard, the system may be configured to determine the type associated with the first source and based on the type of the first source determine a level of scrutiny for considering data processing items sourced from the first source and its type. In some embodiments, the system may be configured to determine a level of scrutiny for considering data processing items sourced from the first source regardless of the type. For example, the system may determine that the mobile device of the customer used in capturing the information from the check is an older version and not the version recommended by the financial institution for the capture of check images. In response, the system may be configured to increase the level of scrutiny associated with the processing of the check images captured by the mobile device. In another example, the system may be configured to determine that the scanner installed in an ATM at a particular geographic location has been known to provide inconsistent check images in the past. In response, the system may be configured to increase the level of scrutiny associated with the processing of data processing items captured by the scanner in that ATM. In yet another example, the system may be configured to determine that the check was deposited at a physical facility associated with the financial institution. In response, the system may be configured to decrease the level of scrutiny associated with the data processing item.
[0090] Next, as shown in block 708, the process flow includes based thereon, routing the data processing item for data processing to an automated data processing network or a manual data processing network. In some embodiments, the automated data processing network may include the process of generating an electronic file associated with the data processing item and routing the data processing item via the financial institution network services to complete the transaction. For example, once the check is deposited, the financial institution may scan the check to capture an image and create a corresponding electronic file. The file is then sent to a clearinghouse that sorts checks to send to the financial institutions against which the checks are drawn. Then, proprietary systems at the financial institution receive the data file from the check, match the data to the customer who initially wrote the check (payor), determine that the payor has sufficient funds in their financial institution account, and then facilitate the transfer of funds from the payor to the payee. In some other embodiments, the manual data processing network involves the intervention of one or more financial institution employees to manually assess the check and/or the check image file to determine and/or confirm the set of information associated with the check.
[0091] FIG. 8 illustrates a process flow for routing data processing among different data processing channels based on secondary and tertiary information sources 800, in accordance with embodiments of the invention. As shown in block 802, the process flow includes determining a second resource of information associated with a data processing item. In this regard, the second source of information may include any backend information available to the financial institution regarding the data processing item. For example, second source of information associated with a check may include, but is not limited to information associated with the payor, payee, an amount of funds, and/or the like. In one aspect, information associated with the payor and/or the payee may include, but is not associated with past transactions associated with payor and/or the payee, financial behavior associated with the payor and/or the payee, a pattern associated with the past transactions and/or the financial behavior associated with the payor and/or payee, and/or the like. In another aspect, information associated with an amount of funds to be transferred includes determining whether the amount of funds to be transferred is greater or lesser than a predetermined transaction amount limit.
[0092] Next, the process flow includes determining a source that are probability associated with the second source, as shown in block 804. In this regard, the system may be configured to analyze the second source and the set of information associated with the check image to determine whether the second source is within a tolerable and are probability. For example, the system may determine whether the information associated with the payee and the amount of funds to be transferred to the payee correspond to a predetermined pattern associated with past transactions and/or financial behavior associated with the payor. The system may then determine whether the set of information associated with the check image is within a tolerable that are probability associated with the second source. For example, if the transaction amount associated with the check is $1000 and the payor and payee have been known to conduct transactions with each other within a transaction amount range of $50-$5000, the error probability associated with a second source is considered to be within tolerable limit. In another example, if the transaction amount associated with the check is $50,000 and the payor and payee have been known to conduct transactions with each other within a transaction amount range of $50-$5000, the error probability associated with a second source is considered to be outside tolerable limit.
[0093] Next, as shown in block 806, the process flow includes based on first and/or first source error probability, route or re-route the data processing item for data processing. In this regard, the data processing item that was initially routed to the automated processing network based on information associated with the first source may be re-routed to a manual data processing network based on at least the second source error probability and/or a combination of probabilities from both the first source and the second source. Similarly, data processing item initially routed to the manual data processing network may then be rerouted to the automated data processing network based on at least the second source error probability and/or a combination of probabilities from both the first source and the second source.
[0094] Next, as shown in block 808, the process flow includes determining a third source of information associated with the data processing item. In this regard, the third source of information may include any external customer information available to the financial institution. For example, the third source of information may include but is not limited to social network information, geographic location information, customer profile information, and/or the like. Accordingly, the system may be configured to determine a source error probability associated with the third source, as shown in block 810. In response, the process flow includes based on the first, second, and/or third source error probability, route or re-route the data processing item for data processing. In this way, the system may combine better probabilities associated with multiple sources to determine an ideal route for the data processing item to be processed seamlessly.
[0095] In some embodiments, the level of scrutiny for considering the data processing item may be adjustable based on at least combining the information associated with the first source with the information associated with the second and/or third sources. For example, if the transaction amount associated with the check is $50,000 and the payor and payee have been known to conduct transactions with each other with the transaction amount range of $50-$5000, the error probability associated with the second source is considered to be outside tolerable limit. In this case, the level of scrutiny associated with the check may be high. However, the third source of information may indicate that the financial institution accounts associated with the payor and/or payee have not been associated with misappropriate activity. In response, the level of scrutiny for considering the check may be lowered accordingly.
[0096] As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the present invention may be embodied as an apparatus (including, for example, a system, a machine, a device, a computer program product, and/or the like), as a method (including, for example, a business process, a computer-implemented process, and/or the like), or as any combination of the foregoing. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention may take the form of an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, or the like), an entirely hardware embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may generally be referred to herein as a “system.” Furthermore, embodiments of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product that includes a computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code portions stored therein. As used herein, a processor may be “configured to” perform a certain function in a verity of ways, including, for example, by having one or more general-purpose circuits perform the functions by executing one or more computer-executable program code portions embodied in a computer-readable medium, and/or having one or more application-specific circuits perform the function.
[0097] It will be understood that any suitable computer-readable medium may be utilized. The computer-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, a non-transitory computer-readable medium, such as a tangible electronic, magnetic, optical, infrared, electromagnetic, and/or semiconductor system, apparatus, and/or device. For example, in some embodiments, the non-transitory computer-readable medium includes a tangible medium such as a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), and/or some other tangible optical and/or magnetic storage device. In other embodiments of the present invention, however, the computer-readable medium may be transitory, such as a propagation signal including computer-executable program code portions embodied therein.
[0098] It will also be understood that one or more computer-executable program code portions for carrying out operations of the present invention may include object-oriented, scripted, and/or unscripted programming languages, such as, for example, Java, Perl, Smalltalk, C++, SAS, SQL, Python, Objective C, and/or the like. In some embodiments, the one or more computer-executable program code portions for carrying out operations of embodiments of the present invention are written in conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming languages and/or similar programming languages. The computer program code may alternatively or additionally be written in one or more multi-paradigm programming languages, such as, for example, F#.
[0099] It will further be understood that some embodiments of the present invention are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of systems, methods, and/or computer program products. It will be understood that each block included in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks included in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, may be implemented by one or more computer-executable program code portions. These one or more computer-executable program code portions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, and/or some other programmable data processing apparatus in order to produce a particular machine, such that the one or more computer-executable program code portions, which execute via the processor of the computer and/or other programmable data processing apparatus, create mechanisms for implementing the steps and/or functions represented by the flowchart(s) and/or block diagram block(s).
[0100] It will also be understood that the one or more computer-executable program code portions may be stored in a transitory or non-transitory computer-readable medium (e.g., a memory, or the like) that can direct a computer and/or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the computer-executable program code portions stored in the computer-readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instruction mechanisms which implement the steps and/or functions specified in the flowchart(s) and/or block diagram block(s).
[0101] The one or more computer-executable program code portions may also be loaded onto a computer and/or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer and/or other programmable apparatus. In some embodiments, this produces a computer-implemented process such that the one or more computer-executable program code portions which execute on the computer and/or other programmable apparatus provide operational steps to implement the steps specified in the flowchart(s) and/or the functions specified in the block diagram block(s). Alternatively, computer-implemented steps may be combined with operator and/or human-implemented steps in order to carry out an embodiment of the present invention.
[0102] While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of, and not restrictive on, the broad invention, and that this invention not be limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other changes, combinations, omissions, modifications and substitutions, in addition to those set forth in the above paragraphs, are possible. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various adaptations and modifications of the just described embodiments can be configured without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Therefore, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A data processing system for routing data processing among different processing channels based on source-error probabilities, the data processing system comprising:
a memory device with computer-readable program code stored thereon;
a communication device;
a processing device operatively coupled to the memory device and the communication device, wherein the processing device is configured to execute the computer-readable program code to:
receive a data processing job comprising at least one data processing item;
determine a first source of the at least one data processing item;
determine a source error probability associated with the first source of the at least one data processing item; and
based on the determined source error probability, route the at least one data processing item for data processing to an automated data processing network or a manual data processing network.
2. The data processing system of claim 1, wherein the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to:
determine a second source of information associated with the at least one data processing item;
determine a source error probability associated with the second source of information; and
based on the determined source error probabilities associated with both the first source of the at least one data processing item and/or the second source of information, route or re-route the at least one data processing item for data processing.
3. The data processing system of claim 2, wherein the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to:
determine a third source of information associated with the at least one data processing item;
determine a source error probability associated with the third source of information; and
based on the determined source error probabilities associated with the first source of the at least one data processing item, the second source of information and/or the third source of information, route or re-route the at least one data processing item for data processing.
4. The data processing system of claim 2, wherein the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to:
route the at least one data processing item to an automated data processing network; and
in response, determine the second source of information.
5. The data processing system of claim 4, wherein the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to:
based on the source error probability of the second source of information, re-route the at least one data processing item to a manual data processing network.
6. The data processing system of claim 4, wherein the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to:
based on the source error probability of the second source of information, re-route the at least one data processing item to a second automatic data processing network;
determine a third source of the at least one data processing item;
determine a source error probability associated with the third source of the at least one data processing item; and
based on the determined source error probabilities associated with the third source of the at least one data processing item, route or re-route the at least one data processing item to a manual data processing network.
7. The data processing system of claim 3, wherein the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to:
combine the source error probabilities associated with each of the first source of the at least one data processing item, the second source of information and the third source of information;
compare the combined source error probabilities to a predetermined threshold; and
in response, route the at least one data processing item.
8. The data processing system of claim 3, wherein the second source of information comprises financial institution backend information and the third source of information comprises customer information.
9. The data processing system of claim 1, wherein the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to:
determine a type associated with the first source of the at least one data processing item;
based on the type of the first source of the at least one data processing item, determine a level of scrutiny for considering data processing items sourced from the first source of the at least one data processing item; and
based on the determined level of scrutiny, route the at least one data processing item.
10. The data processing system of claim 9, wherein the processing device is further configured to execute computer-readable code to:
determine at least one second source of information associated with the at least one data processing item;
compare first information sourced from the first source of the at least one data processing item with second information sourced from the at least one second source of information; and
in response, adjust the level of scrutiny lower if the first information and the second information are the same and higher if the first information and the second information are different.
11. The data processing system of claim 10, wherein the at least one second source of information comprises a financial institution backend system and/or a customer information system.
12. A computer program product for routing data processing among different processing channels based on source-error probabilities, the computer program product comprising at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer-readable program code portions embodied therein, the computer-readable program code portions comprising:
an executable portion configured for receiving a data processing job comprising at least one data processing item;
an executable portion configured for determining a first source of the at least one data processing item;
an executable portion configured for determining a source error probability associated with the first source of the at least one data processing item; and
based on the determined source error probability, an executable portion configured for routing the at least one data processing item for data processing to an automated data processing network or a manual data processing network.
13. The computer program product of claim 12, further comprising computer-readable program code to:
determine a second source of information associated with the at least one data processing item;
determine a source error probability associated with the second source of information; and
based on the determined source error probabilities associated with both the first source of the at least one data processing item and/or the second source of information, route or re-route the at least one data processing item for data processing.
14. The computer program product of claim 13, further comprising computer-readable program code to:
determine a third source of information associated with the at least one data processing item;
determine a source error probability associated with the third source of information; and
based on the determined source error probabilities associated with the first source of the at least one data processing item, the second source of information and/or the third source of information, route or re-route the at least one data processing item for data processing.
15. The computer program product of claim 13, further comprising computer-readable program code to:
route the at least one data processing item to an automated data processing network; and
in response, determine the second source of information.
16. The computer program product of claim 15, further comprising computer-readable program code to:
based on the source error probability of the second source of information, re-route the at least one data processing item to a manual data processing network.
17. The computer program product of claim 15, further comprising computer-readable program code to:
based on the source error probability of the second source of information, re-route the at least one data processing item to a second automatic data processing network;
determine a third source of the at least one data processing item;
determine a source error probability associated with the third source of the at least one data processing item; and
based on the determined source error probabilities associated with the third source of the at least one data processing item, route or re-route the at least one data processing item to a manual data processing network.
18. The computer program product of claim 14, further comprising computer-readable program code to:
combine the source error probabilities associated with each of the first source of the at least one data processing item, the second source of information and the third source of information;
compare the combined source error probabilities to a predetermined threshold; and
in response, route the at least one data processing item.
19. The computer program product of claim 14, wherein the second source of information comprises financial institution backend information and the third source of information comprises customer information.
20. A computer-implemented method for routing data processing among different processing channels based on source-error probabilities, the method comprising:
receiving, using a computing device processor, a data processing job comprising at least one data processing item;
determining, using a computing device processor, a first source of the at least one data processing item;
determining, using a computing device processor, a source error probability associated with the first source of the at least one data processing item; and
based on the determined source error probability, routing, using a computing device processor, the at least one data processing item for data processing to an automated data processing network or a manual data processing network.
Patent Citations (286)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3555349(A) | 1971-01-01 | Munz | Applicant |
| US3555988(A) | 1971-01-01 | Wagner | Applicant |
| US3556050(A) | 1971-01-01 | Trachtenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US3558810(A) | 1971-01-01 | Cecchin | Applicant |
| US3560739(A) | 1971-02-01 | Wolff | Applicant |
| US3561432(A) | 1971-02-01 | Yamaki et al. | Applicant |
| US3564133(A) | 1971-02-01 | Hobrough | Applicant |
| US3564266(A) | 1971-02-01 | Klotz, Jr. | Applicant |
| US3566139(A) | 1971-02-01 | Hardy et al. | Applicant |
| US3567856(A) | 1971-03-01 | Nezu | Applicant |
| US3571527(A) | 1971-03-01 | Becker et al. | Applicant |
| US3572924(A) | 1971-03-01 | Matsumoto et al. | Applicant |
| US3576392(A) | 1971-04-01 | Hofstein | Applicant |
| US3576999(A) | 1971-05-01 | Blythe et al. | Applicant |
| US3578857(A) | 1971-05-01 | Busch | Applicant |
| US3584148(A) | 1971-06-01 | Flory | Applicant |
| US3584931(A) | 1971-06-01 | Daring | Applicant |
| US3585283(A) | 1971-06-01 | Graser, Jr. | Applicant |
| US3586765(A) | 1971-06-01 | Jirka | Applicant |
| US3592535(A) | 1971-07-01 | Gerry | Applicant |
| US3592548(A) | 1971-07-01 | Majkowski | Applicant |
| US3614309(A) | 1971-10-01 | Presti | Applicant |
| US3614764(A) | 1971-10-01 | Kolb et al. | Applicant |
| US3615540(A) | 1971-10-01 | Land et al. | Applicant |
| US3619052(A) | 1971-11-01 | Diachuk et al. | Applicant |
| US3619060(A) | 1971-11-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US3620729(A) | 1971-11-01 | Somerset et al. | Applicant |
| US3622224(A) | 1971-11-01 | Wysocki et al. | Applicant |
| US3627918(A) | 1971-12-01 | Redpath | Applicant |
| US3630623(A) | 1971-12-01 | Schirmer | Applicant |
| US3632181(A) | 1972-01-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US3635139(A) | 1972-01-01 | Guite, Sr. | Applicant |
| US3636845(A) | 1972-01-01 | Harvey | Applicant |
| US3643017(A) | 1972-02-01 | Pekau | Applicant |
| US3643019(A) | 1972-02-01 | Beltz | Applicant |
| US3646256(A) | 1972-02-01 | Jacob et al. | Applicant |
| US3647289(A) | 1972-03-01 | Weber | Applicant |
| US3647290(A) | 1972-03-01 | Egnaczak et al. | Applicant |
| US3647441(A) | 1972-03-01 | Bachelder | Applicant |
| US3648388(A) | 1972-03-01 | Lowell et al. | Applicant |
| US3648584(A) | 1972-03-01 | Eacock | Applicant |
| US3652164(A) | 1972-03-01 | Faramarzpour et al. | Applicant |
| US3654707(A) | 1972-04-01 | Roberts | Applicant |
| US3656427(A) | 1972-04-01 | Foley | Applicant |
| US3659159(A) | 1972-04-01 | Nagata | Applicant |
| US3661457(A) | 1972-05-01 | Frech | Applicant |
| US3661577(A) | 1972-05-01 | Klemm et al. | Applicant |
| US3737628(A) | 1973-06-01 | Azure, Jr. | Applicant |
| US3778595(A) | 1973-12-01 | Hatanaka et al. | Applicant |
| US4417136(A) | 1983-11-01 | Rushby et al. | Applicant |
| US4523330(A) | 1985-06-01 | Cain | Applicant |
| US4555617(A) | 1985-11-01 | Brooks et al. | Applicant |
| US5007100(A) | 1991-04-01 | D'Aoust et al. | Applicant |
| US5182656(A) | 1993-01-01 | Chevion et al. | Applicant |
| US5257328(A) | 1993-10-01 | Shimizu | Applicant |
| US5359667(A) | 1994-10-01 | Borowski et al. | Applicant |
| US5453601(A) | 1995-09-01 | Rosen | Applicant |
| US5600574(A) | 1997-02-01 | Reitan | Applicant |
| US5631984(A) | 1997-05-01 | Graf et al. | Applicant |
| US5678046(A) | 1997-10-01 | Cahill et al. | Applicant |
| US5679940(A) | 1997-10-01 | Templeton et al. | Applicant |
| US5687250(A) | 1997-11-01 | Curley et al. | Applicant |
| US5740271(A) | 1998-04-01 | Kunkler et al. | Applicant |
| US5754673(A) | 1998-05-01 | Brooks et al. | Applicant |
| US5774249(A) | 1998-06-01 | Shiraishi et al. | Applicant |
| US5848400(A) | 1998-12-01 | Chang | Applicant |
| US5917965(A) | 1999-06-01 | Cahill et al. | Applicant |
| US5940844(A) | 1999-08-01 | Cahill et al. | Applicant |
| US5963659(A) | 1999-10-01 | Cahill et al. | Applicant |
| US6076074(A) | 2000-06-01 | Cotton et al. | Applicant |
| US6097834(A) | 2000-08-01 | Krouse et al. | Applicant |
| US6115509(A) | 2000-09-01 | Yeskel | Applicant |
| US6122625(A) | 2000-09-01 | Rosen | Applicant |
| US6181814(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Carney | Applicant |
| US6181837(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Cahill et al. | Applicant |
| US6351553(B1) | 2002-02-01 | Hayosh | Applicant |
| US6574377(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Cahill et al. | Applicant |
| US6658393(B1) | 2003-12-01 | Basch et al. | Applicant |
| US6671795(B1) | 2003-12-01 | Marr et al. | Applicant |
| US6697512(B2) | 2004-02-01 | Simonoff | Applicant |
| US6845366(B1) | 2005-01-01 | Hassanein et al. | Applicant |
| US6886136(B1) | 2005-04-01 | Zlotnick et al. | Applicant |
| US6903767(B2) | 2005-06-01 | Robins et al. | Applicant |
| US6913260(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Maier et al. | Applicant |
| US7082216(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7092560(B2) | 2006-08-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7092561(B2) | 2006-08-01 | Downs, Jr. | Applicant |
| US7103438(B2) | 2006-09-01 | Hallowell et al. | Applicant |
| US7171032(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7181430(B1) | 2007-02-01 | Buchanan et al. | Applicant |
| US7191151(B1) | 2007-03-01 | Nosek | Applicant |
| US7191657(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Maier et al. | Applicant |
| US7197173(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7201320(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Csulits et al. | Applicant |
| US7209571(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US7216106(B1) | 2007-05-01 | Buchanan et al. | Applicant |
| US7232024(B2) | 2007-06-01 | Mazur et al. | Applicant |
| US7362891(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7366338(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7376603(B1) | 2008-05-01 | Mayr et al. | Applicant |
| US7386511(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Buchanan et al. | Applicant |
| US7391897(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7436979(B2) | 2008-10-01 | Bruce et al. | Applicant |
| US7440924(B2) | 2008-10-01 | Buchanan et al. | Applicant |
| US7503445(B2) | 2009-03-01 | Yoshioka | Applicant |
| US7505831(B2) | 2009-03-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7505931(B2) | 2009-03-01 | Da Silva | Applicant |
| US7516360(B2) | 2009-04-01 | Bacher et al. | Applicant |
| US7542598(B2) | 2009-06-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7590274(B2) | 2009-09-01 | Raterman et al. | Applicant |
| US7591428(B2) | 2009-09-01 | Freeman et al. | Applicant |
| US7599543(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7602956(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7619721(B2) | 2009-11-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7620231(B2) | 2009-11-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7624071(B2) | 2009-11-01 | Buchanan et al. | Applicant |
| US7628326(B2) | 2009-12-01 | Freeman et al. | Applicant |
| US7635082(B2) | 2009-12-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US7686151(B2) | 2010-03-01 | Renz et al. | Applicant |
| US7702588(B2) | 2010-04-01 | Gilder et al. | Applicant |
| US7729990(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Marceau et al. | Applicant |
| US7735621(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Hallowell et al. | Applicant |
| US7762380(B2) | 2010-07-01 | Freeman et al. | Applicant |
| US7778456(B2) | 2010-08-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7779982(B2) | 2010-08-01 | Fitzgerald et al. | Applicant |
| US7789243(B2) | 2010-09-01 | Hornung et al. | Applicant |
| US7792753(B1) | 2010-09-01 | Slater et al. | Applicant |
| US7797239(B2) | 2010-09-01 | Smith | Applicant |
| US7802721(B2) | 2010-09-01 | Wilson, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US7817842(B2) | 2010-10-01 | Mennie | Applicant |
| US7822629(B2) | 2010-10-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US7849994(B2) | 2010-12-01 | Klein et al. | Applicant |
| US7873200(B1) | 2011-01-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US7873576(B2) | 2011-01-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7881519(B2) | 2011-02-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7882000(B2) | 2011-02-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US7885451(B1) | 2011-02-01 | Walls et al. | Applicant |
| US7885880(B1) | 2011-02-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US7903863(B2) | 2011-03-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7929749(B1) | 2011-04-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7938245(B2) | 2011-05-01 | Jenrick et al. | Applicant |
| US7946406(B2) | 2011-05-01 | Blake et al. | Applicant |
| US7950656(B2) | 2011-05-01 | Adams | Applicant |
| US7962411(B1) | 2011-06-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US7970677(B1) | 2011-06-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US7978899(B2) | 2011-07-01 | Jenrick et al. | Applicant |
| US8025213(B2) | 2011-09-01 | Hartfield et al. | Applicant |
| US8027928(B1) | 2011-09-01 | Hecht, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US8041098(B2) | 2011-10-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US8045784(B2) | 2011-10-01 | Price et al. | Applicant |
| US8060442(B1) | 2011-11-01 | Hecht et al. | Applicant |
| US8073751(B2) | 2011-12-01 | Garg et al. | Applicant |
| US8082207(B2) | 2011-12-01 | Bates et al. | Applicant |
| US8103084(B2) | 2012-01-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US8125624(B2) | 2012-02-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US8126793(B2) | 2012-02-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US8162125(B1) | 2012-04-01 | Csulits et al. | Applicant |
| US8169602(B2) | 2012-05-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US8204293(B2) | 2012-06-01 | Csulits et al. | Applicant |
| US8214373(B1) | 2012-07-01 | Bakir et al. | Applicant |
| US8214686(B2) | 2012-07-01 | Ueda | Applicant |
| US8265346(B2) | 2012-09-01 | Blair | Applicant |
| US8290216(B1) | 2012-10-01 | Blair | Applicant |
| US8297428(B2) | 2012-10-01 | Renz et al. | Applicant |
| US8301565(B2) | 2012-10-01 | Cantley et al. | Applicant |
| US8322505(B2) | 2012-12-01 | Freeman et al. | Applicant |
| US8331643(B2) | 2012-12-01 | Yacoubian et al. | Applicant |
| US8339589(B2) | 2012-12-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US8412605(B2) | 2013-04-01 | Griffin et al. | Applicant |
| US8474704(B1) | 2013-07-01 | Grimm et al. | Applicant |
| US8504456(B2) | 2013-08-01 | Griffin et al. | Applicant |
| US8526751(B2) | 2013-09-01 | Mitchell et al. | Applicant |
| US8527412(B1) | 2013-09-01 | Waldron, III et al. | Applicant |
| US8600879(B2) | 2013-12-01 | Reyes | Applicant |
| US8610966(B2) | 2013-12-01 | Hatzav et al. | Applicant |
| US8639062(B2) | 2014-01-01 | Calman et al. | Applicant |
| US8714336(B2) | 2014-05-01 | Csulits et al. | Applicant |
| US8718367(B1) | 2014-05-01 | Schneider et al. | Applicant |
| US8738529(B2) | 2014-05-01 | Kolhatkar et al. | Applicant |
| US8799161(B2) | 2014-08-01 | Kreutz et al. | Applicant |
| US8824785(B2) | 2014-09-01 | Ives et al. | Applicant |
| US8864029(B2) | 2014-10-01 | McGlamery et al. | Applicant |
| US9025851(B2) | 2015-05-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US9082007(B2) | 2015-07-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0034682(A1) | 2001-10-01 | Knight et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0037297(A1) | 2001-11-01 | McNair | Applicant |
| US2001/0051921(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Gamer, IV et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0038289(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Lawlor et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0072942(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Kuykendall et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0082994(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Herziger | Applicant |
| US2002/0087409(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Joao | Applicant |
| US2002/0128969(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Parmelee et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0059098(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0066876(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Goldman et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0120586(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Litty | Applicant |
| US2003/0126444(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Wakao et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0128375(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Ruhl et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0138128(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2003/0217005(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Drummond et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0133516(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Buchanan et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0153650(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Hillmer | Applicant |
| US2004/0153663(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Clark et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0218729(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Xue et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0245330(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Swift et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0034054(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Tsuyama et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0038756(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Nagel | Applicant |
| US2005/0049950(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US2005/0071283(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Randle et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0080701(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Tunney et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0097019(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Jacobs | Applicant |
| US2005/0125296(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Tidwell et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0139670(A1) | 2005-06-01 | McGlamery et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0213805(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Blake et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0244035(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Klein et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0283609(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Langford | Applicant |
| US2006/0028689(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Perry et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0059201(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Watanabe | Applicant |
| US2006/0080245(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Bahl et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0089905(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Song et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0106717(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Randle et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0116898(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Peterson | Applicant |
| US2006/0117182(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Wolff | Applicant |
| US2006/0182331(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Gilson et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0212391(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Norman et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0212502(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Chatterjee | Applicant |
| US2006/0248009(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Hicks et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0282660(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Varghese et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0043650(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Hughes et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0045395(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Corona et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0100750(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Hartfield et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0124241(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Newton | Applicant |
| US2007/0150412(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Lamparello et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0174214(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Welsh et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0288382(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Narayanan et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0016358(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Filreis et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0040249(A1) | 2008-02-01 | Re et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0059962(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Ito | Applicant |
| US2008/0077474(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Dumas et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0086420(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Gilder et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0086421(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Gilder et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0103800(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Domenikos et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0103972(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Lanc | Applicant |
| US2008/0116257(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Fickling | Applicant |
| US2008/0140576(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Lewis et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0249931(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Gilder et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0256167(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Branson et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0294514(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Calman | Applicant |
| US2008/0294541(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Weinflash et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0307258(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Challenger et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0319922(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Lawrence et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0008442(A1) | 2009-01-01 | Buchanan et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0018958(A1) | 2009-01-01 | Aveyard et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0094148(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Gilder et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0106846(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Dupray et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0141962(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Borgia et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0150288(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Bishop et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0248560(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Recce et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0248573(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Haggerty et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0309694(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Nichols et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0030644(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Dhamodharan | Applicant |
| US2010/0070415(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Buchanan et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0122216(A1) | 2010-05-01 | Song et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0161466(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Gilder | Applicant |
| US2010/0306111(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Slater et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0066547(A1) | 2011-03-01 | Clark et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0099067(A1) | 2011-04-01 | Cooper et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0215034(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Mennie et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0276483(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Saegert et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0117423(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Andrade et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0189186(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Csulits et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0024360(A1) | 2013-01-01 | Ballout | Applicant |
| US2013/0097464(A1) | 2013-04-01 | Ahmad | Examiner |
| US2014/0250336(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Tepus | Examiner |
| US2014/0281704(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Jacobson et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0195190(A1) | 2015-07-01 | Shah Heydari | Examiner |
| US2016/0034362(A1) | 2016-02-01 | Al-Wahabi | Applicant |
| CN1492338(A) | 2004-04-01 | Applicant | |
| CN1885341(A) | 2006-12-01 | Applicant | |
| CN101059863(A) | 2007-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP115189(A1) | 1987-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP671696(A1) | 1995-09-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1507243(A2) | 2005-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2006155439(A) | 2006-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO3040881(A2) | 2003-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2004036386(A2) | 2004-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2005006269(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (21)
- Canadian Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2012 for Application No. 2,546,849.Applicant
- Chen, Ming-ju et al. “A Digital Watermarking of Detecting the Image Integrity Based on DWT.” Information and Electronic Engineering. vol. 6, No. 2, Apr. 2008. Chinese Language. 4 pages.Applicant
- Han, Shui-Hua et al. “Content-based image authentication: current status, issues, and challenges.” Int. J. Inf. Secur. (2010) 9:19-32. DOI 10.1007/s10207-009-0093-2. Regular Contribution. Published Online Oct. 8, 2009. 0 Springer-Verlag 2009.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report of Patentability and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/058380.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report of Patentability and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/058403.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report of Patentability and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/058409.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report of Patentability and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/058414.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 22, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2008/085873.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 3, 2006 for International Application No. PCT/US2004/043832.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 24, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/058403.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 24, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/058414.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 31, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/058409.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 24, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/058380.Applicant
- International Search Report dated Apr. 23, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/083198.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 19, 2005 for International Application No. PCT/US2004/043832.Applicant
- Kwak et al., “Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach”, Technovation, vol. 26, pp. 708-715, 2006.Applicant
- Labys, W. P. (2001). Essays on microstructure and the use of information in limit order markets. (Order No. 3003649, University of Pennsylvania). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 195-195 p. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/251101049?accountid=14753.Applicant
- Mitchell, Joseph Pershing, I., 11. (2000) The central bankers: Administrative legitimacy and the federal reserve system. (Order No. 3065450, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 269-269 p. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304626254?accountid=14753.Applicant
- Muller, J. D. (1998). Selected development in the law of cyberspace payments. The Business Lawyer, 54(1), 403-441. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/228450582?accountid=14753.Applicant
- Patricia Murphy, It's a Time of Change for Check Processing, May 2004, USBanker, pp. 1-5.Applicant
- State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China. Chinese Office Action dated May 11, 2012. Chinese Application No. 200810177822.1. Name of Applicant: Bank of America Corporation. Chinese Language. 34 pages.Applicant