US 9,638,829 B2Grant
Autonomous and controllable systems of sensors and methods of using such systems
Issue Date:2017-05-02
•50 Claims
•19 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
An autonomous and controllable system of sensors and methods for using such a system of sensors are described.
Metadata
Assignee
- CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Inventors
- Faranak Davoodi
- Farhooman Davoudi
Application Information
Application Number:US 14/538,771
Filing Date:2014-11-11
Priority Date:2012-02-23
Art Unit:2685
Classifications
IPC:
H04Q5/22G01V11/00G08C19/00H04Q9/00
Field of Search:
H04Q 9/00H04Q 2209/40H04Q 2209/25G08C 19/00H04N 7/185H04N 7/0857
Patent Drawings (19 sheets)
Description
Cross Reference to Related Applications
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,912,892 filed on Feb. 25, 2013, which, in turn, claims priority to U.S. provisional application No. 61/602,221 filed on Feb. 23, 2012, U.S. provisional application No. 61/662,852 filed on Jun. 21, 2012 and U.S. provisional application No. 61/727,459 filed on Nov. 16, 2012, the reference from all of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Statement of Federal Grant
[0002] The invention described herein was made in the performance of work under a NASA contract, and is subject to the provisions of Public Law 96-517 (35 USC 202) in which the Contractor has elected to retain title.
Field
[0003] The present disclosure relates to sensory systems. More in particular, it relates to autonomous and controllable systems of sensors and methods of using such systems.
Summary
[0004] According to an aspect of the disclosure, a sensor system is provided. The sensor system comprises a plurality of unit sensors, each unit sensor comprising: an inner enclosure; an outer enclosure enclosing the inner enclosure, the outer enclosure including at least one sensing device and a controlling device; and a first elastic layer between an outer surface of the inner enclosure and an inner surface of the outer enclosure, wherein each unit sensor is configured to communicate with other unit sensors within the sensor system; and the plurality of unit sensors in the sensor system form a network of sensors. Methods of using the sensor system are also provided in the disclosure.
Brief Description of the Figures
[0005] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present disclosure and, together with the description of example embodiments, serve to explain the principles and implementations of the disclosure.
[0006] FIG. 1A shows a three-dimensional view of the internal structure of a spherical mobile sensor in an inflated state.
[0007] FIG. 1B shows the internal skeleton of the spherical mobile sensor.
[0008] FIG. 2 shows the spherical mobile sensor in an inflated state without any components in the inner layer except one or more protective spokes and diffuser capsule.
[0009] FIG. 3 shows a perspective view of the internal layered structure of an inflated spherical mobile sensor.
[0010] FIG. 4 shows the structure of the tightening rings inside the spherical mobile sensor.
[0011] FIG. 5 shows spherical mobile sensor with an enhanced orbit.
[0012] FIG. 6 shows an example embodiment of the control mechanism of the spherical mobile sensor, where magnets are used as weights.
[0013] FIGS. 7-9 show example embodiments of the control mechanism of the spherical mobile sensor.
[0014] FIGS. 10-11 show a system of sensors comprising a plurality of spherical mobile sensors.
[0015] FIG. 12 shows the distributed control architecture of the wireless mesh network of sensors.
[0016] FIG. 13 shows an example embodiment of the distributed control architecture of the wireless mesh network of sensors in sea.
[0017] FIG. 14 shows deep sea and underwater communication between submarines, submarines and ships and submarines, satellites and aircraft as occurs in the open ocean using the wireless mesh network of sensors.
[0018] FIG. 15 shows an application of the wireless mesh network of sensors in detecting land mines.
[0019] FIG. 16 shows an application of the wireless mesh network of sensors in detecting and mapping various minerals and materials in an area of interest.
[0020] FIGS. 17-18 show application of wireless mesh network of sensors in monitoring land, ice and maritime of the Arctic.
Detailed Description
[0021] Throughout the present disclosure, embodiments and variations are described for the purpose of illustrating uses and implementations of the inventive concept. The illustrative description should be understood as presenting examples of the inventive concept, rather than as limiting the scope of the concept as disclosed herein. Like reference numerals indicate corresponding parts in various figures.
[0022] In the present disclosure, the term “sensing device” can be used to refer to a device used for measuring a physical quantity. Some examples of a sensing device is: gamma spectrometer, multispectral microscopic imager, alpha particle X-ray spectrometer, Raman spectrometer with a VLOK microchip laser integrated within a Raman probe-head, miniature mass spectrometer (MMS), MEMS gas chromatography sensors, different MEMs gas detectors, etc.
[0023] In the present disclosure, the term “controlling device” can be used to refer to a device used for controlling the movement and communication of a structure, where the structure can comprise various sensing devices.
[0024] According to an example embodiment of the present disclosure, FIG. 1A shows a three-dimensional view of the internal structure of a spherical mobile sensor (100) in an inflated state. Depending on the application in which the spherical mobile sensor (100) is to be deployed, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can have oval, cylindrical or other three-dimensional shapes as well. The spherical mobile sensor (100) can be in an un-inflated or foldable state as well (for example, during deployment of the spherical mobile sensor from a launching vehicle), depending on the application. Having a spherical structure can help the mobile sensor (100) act as a three-dimensional wheel that can easily be moved by an internal or external drive in any possible direction. In addition, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be deployed in nature or in indoor areas where ambient forces such as wind, sea-currents, solar rays, and down-rolling gravity could be present. By utilizing such ambient forces alone or in combination with internal power sources of the mobile sensor (100), the spherical mobile sensor (100) can save more energy.
[0025] As illustrated in the example embodiment of FIG. 1A , the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be comprised of two sublayers: an outer layer (101) and an inner layer (102), where the two sublayers (101) and (102) are separated from each other by a skin (103) that is generally thin. The skin (103) will be referred to as an “inner skin” throughout the present disclosure. A thin skin (104), referred to as an “outer skin” throughout the present disclosure, can entirely cover the outer layer (101) of the spherical sensor (100) in order to ensure the spherical shape of the sensor (100) when the sensor (100) is deflated. When deflated, the outer skin (104) could act like a plastic bag holding the inner layer (102), inner skin (103) and the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100). The outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can extend from an inner side of the outer skin (104) to an outer side of the inner skin (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100). The inner side being the side of the outer skin (104) located at the outer layer (101) of the mobile sensor (100). The outer side being the side of the inner skin (103) located at the outer layer (101) of the mobile sensor (100). The inner skin (103) of the spherical sensor (100) can completely enclose the inner layer (102) of the spherical sensor.
[0026] In accordance with the present disclosure, FIG. 1B shows the internal skeleton (105) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) without any outer skin (104) and inner skin (103). Different components of the internal skeleton (105) are discussed in later sections of this disclosure.
[0027] According to an example embodiment of the present disclosure, FIG. 2 shows the spherical mobile sensor (100) in an inflated state without any components in the inner layer (102), except one or more protective spokes (208). The outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) in the inflated state can be filled with, for example, elastomer polymer (e.g. polyurethane or metallic micro-lattices aerogel). The outer layer (101) can comprise one or more temperature and mass sensors (201), micro-processors (202), micro-transceivers (203), imagers (204) surrounded by a liquid or gel (205), and one or more disseminator canisters (206). The one or more disseminator canisters (206) can use, for example, a NASA standard initiator (NSI) or other pyrotechnic tools to trigger or break caps of the one or more disseminator canisters (206) in order to release its content. The protective spokes (208) can help the spherical sensor to maintain its spherical shape. The protective spokes (208) can be used as antennas as well.
[0028] In order to make the outer layer (101) water, temperature, tensile and puncture resistant, the outer layer (101) can be coated with, for example, polyurea resin. The various components (201,202, 203, 204, 205 and 206) of the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be embedded in the elastomer polymer (for example, any polyurethane, e.g. TRYMER® 1800 or metallic micro-lattices) inside the outer layer (101). The metallic micro-lattices elastomers can have a very low density as well as efficient shock absorbing capacity. Additionally, the metallic micro-lattices elastomer can be able to completely recover their shape after significant compression. On the other hand, rubbery polyurea based aerogel, which is heavy but sturdy, can be used to fill the outer layer (101) as well for some applications, for example, spherical sensors (100) deployed in an extremely windy locations such as the Antarctica. Moreover, the protective elastomers inside the outer layer (101) can help the spherical mobile sensor (100) to be bouncy or elastic and can improve the spherical mobile sensor's (100) agility and movement. Therefore, the elastic and bouncy spherical mobile sensor (100) can be agile, can rebound from impact with an obstacle and can be salted by wind in order to pass through cluttered surfaces without using a significant amount of energy.
[0029] As shown in the example embodiment of FIG. 2 , the sensors (201), micro-processors (202), micro-transceivers (203) etc., embedded inside the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100), can be used for various sensing and data collecting activities. Some examples of such sensors are: MEMS (micro electro mechanical system), CMOS panoramic imager, Gamma spectrometers, multispectral microscopic imager, Raman spectrometer with a VLOK microchip laser integrated within a Raman probe-head, miniature mass spectrometer (MMS), MEMS gas chromatography sensors, different MEMs gas detectors, alpha particle X-ray spectrometer, Raman spectrometer, camera on A chip DigiKey OVM7690-R20A, dino-lite digital microscope, ocean optics USB2000 spectrometer, micro-weather station etc. More example sensors can be found in references [4]-[20], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The imager (204) integrated at the outer layer (101) can use, for example, technology similar to that of a liquid compass in order to hold the imager's (204) lens (not shown) in a stabilize position, when rest of the spherical mobile sensor's (100) structure is rolling. The imagers (204) can be surrounded by a liquid or gel (205) in order to stabilize the lens of the imager (204). The imagers (204) could be protected by sapphire or protective transparent elastomers.
[0030] The outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can further comprise one or more energy harvesting materials and tools (207) to charge one or more internal sources of power (e.g. a battery, a capacitor etc.) of the spherical mobile sensor (100). The vibration caused by the movement of the spherical mobile sensor's (100) elastic structure, can be used to harvest energy and the harvested energy can be used to charge the battery. Several small, lightweight and rechargeable polymer lithium ion batteries or rechargeable thin film lithium ion batteries could be placed inside the outer layer (101) or on the inner skin (103) of the spherical sensor (100). Some special polymers, for example, triboelectric (which can generate or produce electricity by harnessing friction between surfaces) or self-charging power cell (SCPC) (which can harvest mechanical energy more efficiently than systems using separate generators and batteries) can be embedded inside the outer layer (101) as well, in order to generate power by harvesting the vibration and motion of the spherical mobile sensor (100).
[0031] According to another example embodiment of the present disclosure, FIG. 3 shows a perspective view of the internal layered structure of an inflated spherical mobile sensor (100). As illustrated in FIG. 3 , the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) further comprises one or more rigidizable tightening rings (301) (only one tightening ring is shown in FIG. 3 ) encircling the inner layer (102) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) at different angles. The tightening rings (301) can be used to hold the spherical mobile sensor (100) structure tightly together. Additionally, the tightening rings (301) can be used to rigidize and inflate the structure of the inner layer (102) as shown in FIG. 4 . The tightening rings (301) can be made of, for example, aluminum, titanium or carbon fiber. As shown in FIG. 4 , the tightening rings (301) can be comprised of a plurality of strands (401) connected to each other through flexible mechanical joints (402), similar to the strings in an umbrella. The tightening rings (301) can be laminated on the outer side of the inner skin (103). Moreover, as mentioned previously, if in some applications stronger structure of a spherical sensor (100) is desired, multiple thin films (403) of aluminum or carbon-fiber could be laminated inside the polymeric inner skin (103) in order to make the inner skin harder when desired.
[0032] With reference back to FIG. 3 , the sensors (201) and the micro-devices (for example, micro-processors (202), micro-transceivers (203), etc.) situated at the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be symmetrically distributed around the tightening rings (301) and the spherical mobile sensor (100) structure based on their weights in order to keep the entire spherical mobile sensor (100) structure balanced. The tightening rings (301) can also function as an antenna for the spherical mobile sensor's (100) communication system. The wires and cables used for transferring electricity and data between the various sensors, electronics, and micro-devices in different parts of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be attached around the tightening rings (301) as well, in order to stay protected and intact while adding strength to the tightening rings (301) and therefore to the structure of the spherical mobile sensor (100).
[0033] For certain applications, for example, if the spherical mobile sensor (100) needs to carry and dispense some materials (e.g. chemical materials or bacteria) in some specific areas, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can incorporate one or more tubular rings (302) with attached one or more disseminator canisters (206) at the outer layer (101), as shown in FIG. 3 . The one or more tubular rings (302) situated at the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100), encircles the inner layer (102) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) as well. The numbers and sizes of the tubular rings (302) present inside a spherical sensor (100), as well as the numbers and sizes of one or more disseminator canisters (206) connected to it can vary depending on size, mass and application of the spherical mobile sensor (100). The one or more tubular rings (302) could be made of, for example, ETFE covered by polyurea resin. ETFE has a very high melting temperature, and good chemical and electrical resistance properties. The tubular ring (302) made of ETFE and covered by polyurea resin, can become tensile resistant as well. Examples of other applications where the spherical mobile sensor (100) may require to carry certain chemicals or bacteria in an area of interest, can be, for example, surface of the sea to clean up an oil spillage using some cleaning up chemicals or bacteria. For applications like this, the one or more tubular rings (302) and the one or more disseminator canisters (206) can contain the chemicals and the bacteria that are required to be spread over an area of interest.
[0034] In accordance with the present disclosure, the example embodiment of FIG. 3 further illustrates different components of the inner layer (102) of the spherical mobile sensor (100). As previously indicated, the inner skin (103) separates the inner layer (102) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) from its outer layer (101). A plurality of the sensors (for example, 201,202, 203, 204, 205 and 206) and other electronic circuitries can be printed or laminated on the outer side of the inner skin (103) of the sensor (100). The inner skin (103) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be made of printable circuitry suitable materials, for example, BoPET (Biaxially-oriented polyethylene terephthalate), nanowires (highly conductive and elastic conductors made from silver nanoscale wires), kapton, ETFE (ethylene tetra fluoro ethylene) or kevlar in combination with carbon nanotubes, in order to provide high tensile-resistance and high strength to the inner skin (103) over a wide temperature range. Due to this quality of high tensile-resistance and high strength, the inner skin (103) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be imprinted with variety of electronic circuits, batteries, capacitors, sensors, solar cells, antenna, and thereby saving mass and space for the spherical mobile sensor (100), relative to a case where such components are not imprinted on the inner skin (103). The lighter weight can help the sensor (100) to move easily as well. Additionally, the materials (for example, kapton, ETFE or kevlar in combination with carbon nanotubes) used for the inner skin (103) can remain stable for temperature differences ranging from −100 to +100° C., which can prevent the decay of the spherical mobile sensor (100) if deployed in harsh environments, for example, the Arctic, Antarctic, deserts, deep-seas, etc. Moreover, if in some applications stronger structure of a spherical sensor (100) is desired, multiple thin films of aluminum or carbon-fiber could be laminated inside the polymeric inner skin (103) in order to make it harder when desired.
[0035] According to the example embodiment of FIG. 3 , the inner layer (102) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be comprised of a control mechanism (303) and one or more diffuser capsules (304) (only one capsule is shown in FIG. 3 ). The one or more diffuser capsules (304) inside the inner layer (102) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be used to carry solid or liquid nitrogen in a compact form and can use, for example, a NASA Standard Initiator (NSI), or any other pyrotechnic tool, with a solid propellant in order to trigger and explode the capsule's cap to open and diffuse the nitrogen gas when necessary. Additionally, the one or more diffuser capsules (304) can contain some strengthening rigidizable waxes such as polyurea glue to spray and cover an inner side of the inner skin (103) of the spherical mobile sensor (100). The inner side being the side of the inner skin (103) located at the inner layer of the mobile sensor (100). This can help to maintain the spherical shape of the spherical mobile sensor (100) for a long time and can make it water, temperature, tensile, and puncture resistant. There could be a low mass and low power pressure sensors, for example, the thin film pressure sensor [19] laminated inside the inner skin (103) to ensure the inner pressure of the inner layer (102) is as desired.
[0036] According to an example embodiment of the present disclosure, FIG. 3 illustrates the control mechanism (303) of the spherical mobile sensor (100), which can comprise at least three equal length principle axles (“X”, “Y” and “Z”) orthogonally connected to each other at their center, where each axle is surrounded by a light weight tube (308). Each tube (308) surrounding the axles can be made of, for example, ETFE, or a particular polymer or a composition of more than one polymer, in order to keep the tube light weight. Additionally, the length of each tube (308) can be more than the length of the axle, where each tube (308) can extend up to the inner skin (103) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) in either direction from their corresponding center. The control mechanism (303) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can further comprise at least six movable equal weights (305). For example, the control mechanism (303) can include two weights in each axle to balance and adjust the motion of the spherical mobile sensor (100). The light weight tubes (308) surrounding each axle can keep the movable weights (305) secure and can prevent the movable weights (305) from hurting the structure of the spherical mobile sensor (100), for example, if the axles get broken while the spherical mobile sensor (100) is in the field. Each weight from the pair of weights in each axel can be separated from each other by a blocking structure (306) located at the junction of the three axles, where the blocking structure (306) can prevent the weights from passing through the center of each axle. The level of freedom for each weight can be from the inner skin (103) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) to the center of the spherical mobile sensor (100) and vice versa. When the movable weights are in a centrally-symmetric position, the blocking structure (306) can act as a center of mass for the spherical mobile sensor (100) and can help in the spherical mobile sensor's (100) movement by an internal or external force such as wind. Alternatively, the movable weights can control the mobile sensor's (100) motion by changing the center of mass of the structure. In the absence of an external force, the movable weights can set the mobile sensor in motion by appropriately moving in the axles and therefore, creating a torque. The axles (“X”, “Y” and “Z”) can be used as, for example, dipole antennas as well, in order to save mass and space for the spherical mobile sensor (100).
[0037] A controller (307) situated inside the blocking structure (306) can control the position of the weights and therefore the spherical mobile sensor's (100) movements by controlling the movements of the corresponding axle using the controller's (307) motor (not shown in FIG. 3 ) and a desired algorithm uploaded in the controller's (307) processor. The positioning of the weights can aid in movement of the mobile sensor (100). By way of example and not of limitation, the controller (307) can be in charge of computations, positioning sensors, controlling algorithms, and actuating. Some part of the controlling tasks, such as computations could be done, for example, in a remote control device or in a computer outside the spherical mobile sensor (100). Moreover, instruments such as a gyroscope or an accelerometer can be utilized to help the controller (307) to recognize the orientation and the direction of the spherical mobile sensor's (100) movement. Such instruments can be located inside the blocking structure (306) as well. The blocking structure (306) can be made of, for example, aluminum, titanium, kevlar, ETFE, kapton or carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer with a coat of polyurea in order to hold and secure the controller (307) and electronics of the spherical mobile sensor (100). The controller (307), batteries, controller's motor and controller's processor can be situated at the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) as well, and can control the position of the weights and therefore the spherical mobile sensor's (100) movements in similar ways as indicated above.
[0038] In the example embodiment of FIG. 3 , by adjusting the weights along the direction of (−x, 0), (0, +x), (−y, 0), (0, +y), (−z, 0), (0, +z) of axles “X”, “Y” and “Z, the center of mass of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be relocated and adjusted to control the direction and the speed of the spherical mobile sensor's (100) movement. For example, the spherical sensor (100) can initiate moving in a desired direction by pushing the weights (305) one after another from the center to the inner skin (103) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) and can control and adjust the speed in order to stop movement, start movement, accelerate or decelerate by bringing all the weights (305) down or by pushing the weights (305) against the direction of the wind, using the controller (307) and the internal source of power such as a battery.
[0039] Additionally, the weights (305) can be calibrated in order to maintain the balance and the torque of the spherical mobile sensor (100) and to reduce energy utilized in movement of the spherical mobile sensor (100) (e.g. rolling movement, hopping movement). The controller's (307) motor can use the energy stored in the spherical mobile sensor's (100) energy storage elements (i.e. batteries or capacitors) to control the movements of the spherical mobile sensor (100). By way of example and not of limitation, by actuating the movable weights (305) by using any propellant system (e.g. an axle controlled by the motor inside the controller (307) or a gas or a liquid whose pressure would change by temperature) and adjusting the center of mass inside the spherical sensor (100), the trajectory of the spherical mobile sensor (100) with a controller (307) that can sit for example, in the center of the sphere, can be corrected or altered depending on situation. Moreover, non-holonomic motion planning and control techniques with at least one microcontroller and accelerometer can determine the movements of the weights (305) to affect the motion of the spherical mobile sensor (100).
[0040] As shown in the example embodiment of FIG. 5 , by using the spherical mobile sensor's (100) control mechanism (303) (not shown in the figure), the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be rolled over an enhanced orbit (501). If the speed of the spherical mobile sensor (100) and the wind is relatively steady, the weights (305 in FIG. 3 ) can be adjusted in order to stabilize motion and orientation of the spherical mobile sensor (100) to make it roll just over an enhanced orbit (501). The enhanced orbit (501) could be made of a sturdy material, for example kevlar, and may allow the spherical mobile sensor (100) to roll on this orbit for extended periods of time without any damage. The orientation of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be defined with respect to the position of the sensors and devices on the spherical mobile sensor (100). For example, the imager (204) may be positioned in a certain place on the spherical mobile sensor (100) and, depending on a desired image of an object, the spherical mobile sensor (100) could be oriented in a certain direction. Gyroscopes (some example for such gyroscopes could be found in reference [20], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) can be used determine the orientation. The spherical mobile sensor (100) rolling over an enhanced orbit (501) could be help the internal instruments (for example, cameras, spectrometers, etc.) of the sensor to operate properly. In order to increase lifespan of the spherical mobile sensor (100), high tensile resistance materials (for example, kevlar or polyurea) can be integrated on the enhanced orbit (501) of the spherical mobile sensor (100). On the other hand, positioning an imager (204) on a horizontal axis relative to the ground and making the spherical mobile sensor (100) to roll in a stabilized motion around the enhanced orbit (501) can help the imager to capture sharper pictures. Additionally, as mentioned previously, in order to keep the imager's (204) lens (502) stabilized when the rest of the spherical mobile sensor's (100) structure is rolling, a technique similar to a liquid compass (503) can be used. A gyroscopic camera (504) in a gel or a liquid (505), for example, ethanol (which freezes at −114° C.), protected by either sapphire or protective transparent elastomers (506), such as ETFE, etc. can be used in this case. Therefore, the gyroscopic camera (504) can be directed in a fixed position when the rest of the structure of the spherical mobile sensor (100) is spinning around the liquid-like gel or a liquid around the gyroscopic camera (504).
[0041] According to an example embodiment of the present disclosure, FIG. 6 shows another embodiment of the control mechanism (600) of spherical mobile sensor (100), where magnets are used as weights. Similar to the previous embodiment of the control mechanism (303) of spherical mobile sensor (100) described in FIG. 3 , the example control mechanism of FIG. 6 comprises at least six equal weight magnets (601), two in each axle. Each magnet from the pair of magnets in each axle is separated from the other by a blocking structure (306) located at the junction of the three axles, where the blocking structure (306) blocks the weights from passing through the center of each axle. The level of freedom for each weight can be from the inner skin (103) to the center of the spherical mobile sensor (100) and vice versa. In the example embodiment of FIG. 6 , the three axles (“X”, “Y” and “Z”) with movable magnetic weights (601) are placed inside the tubes (308), where the tubes (308) can be wrapped with a coil (For example coppered or imprinted) to form a solenoid (602), attached to the electronic circuits inside the controller (307). Position of the magnetic weights (601) in the tubes (308) can be adjusted by controlling the amount of electricity sent to the solenoid (602) by the controller (307), where the electricity is generated from the power stored in the spherical mobile sensor's (100) battery. The battery could be placed inside the controller (307) or it could be embedded inside the outer layer (101) or on the inner skin (103) of the spherical mobile sensor (100). The battery could be a rechargeable thin film lithium ion battery. By actuating the movable magnetic weights (601) in a non-centrally symmetric position, the spherical mobile sensor's (100) externally forced motion could be controlled by the controller (307) by changing the center of mass of the spherical sensor (100). Trajectory of the spherical sensor (100) can be corrected or altered by actuating the movable magnetic weights (601). Moreover, a non-holonomic motion planning and control techniques with at least an on-board microcontroller and accelerometer implementation can determine mass movements to affect the motion of the spherical sensor (100). In the absence of an external force, the movable magnetic weights (601) can set the spherical mobile sensor (100) in motion by appropriately moving and creating a torque.
[0042] Moreover, if the weights are magnets and the tubes in the control mechanism (303) are covered by solenoid as shown in the example embodiment of FIG. 6 , leaving the magnetic weights (601) loose (e.g. the weights are not stiffly positioned in the tube) when the spherical mobile sensor (100) is rolling around, the movements of the magnetic masses (601) within the coils can induce electrical energy based on the Faraday law and the induced energy can be stored in the battery of the spherical mobile sensor (100). Experiments with linear moving mass generators (coupled to capacitive energy storage, some examples can be found in reference [1], incorporated herein by reference by in its entirety) predict that continuously rolling motions of 1-2 meters/second of a 1 meter diameter spherical sensor (100) can generate 1.0-3.0 milliwatts average power over 1 rolling cycle for a magnet pair aligned with the rolling motion. Since according to the example embodiments of the present disclosure, the axles (“X”, “Y” and “Z”) of the control mechanism (303) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) are orthogonal to one another, the currents and the fields of the three axles could be independent and cannot be coupled with one another. This can make control of the spherical mobile sensor (100) easier as each direction (X, Y or Z) can be controlled independently without taking the coupling of the fields into account. There could be various numbers of axels and various degrees of angles between the axels. However, the design of the control mechanism as shown in FIG. 6 is an optimized design as described above and for the applications described. This harvested power can be used later either by the spherical mobile sensor's (100) electronics or the controller (303) itself and can make the entire system self-contained, lighter as well as the life span of the spherical sensor (100) longer.
[0043] Alternatively, in the example embodiment of FIG. 6 , instead of solenoid coil (602) being rolled around the tubes (308) and the magnetic weights (601) moving in the tubes (308), the tubes (308) or the axels can be made of magnets, where the weights could be solenoids, configured to be moved by the controller's (307) internal motor and by axles or other internal propellant system. Therefore, the solenoid-mass can act as an actuator. According to another alternate embodiment of the example embodiment of FIG. 6 , instead of using magnetic weights, thermoelectric materials can be used, where any temperature differences could be used to harvest electricity. In order to save the mass needed for harvesting energy as well as controlling the spherical mobile sensor (100), the thermoelectric materials can be placed in the center of the spherical mobile sensor (100) as well. Alternatively, piezoelectric crystals can be used as weights. By moving and hitting the piezoelectric crystal weights, weights inside the tumbling spherical mobile sensor (100) could harvest energy that can be stored in the battery for later use. Additionally, the piezoelectric crystals can be placed on the inner layer (102) of the spherical structure, either in the center or on the inner skin (103), where the loose weights could impact and hit. The impact and the pressure applied by such impact to the piezoelectric crystal may induce some electricity that could be harvested and stored as well.
[0044] In accordance with the present disclosure, the example embodiment of FIG. 7 illustrates another example embodiment of the control mechanism (303). In this example embodiment, the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be attached by ball bearings (701) to a favorable axle (702) inside the inner layer. The favorable axle (702) can be attached to the central region (703) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) using ball bearings (704) as well. However, in the example embodiment of FIG. 7 , other internal parts of the inner layer (102) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) are not attached to the outer layer (101). If an external force such as wind or an internal force can cause the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) to roll, the components of the inner layer (102) can stay fixed and may not roll because of the ball-bearing attached to the favorable axle (702). Therefore, in the example embodiment of FIG. 7 , the components of the inner layer (102) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be restrained from rotating while the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) is rolling around.
[0045] As illustrated in the example embodiments of FIGS. 8-9 , when the spherical mobile sensor (100) is moving around under either an internal force or an external force, such as wind, the spherical mobile sensor's (100) orientation can be rotated towards the favorable orientation by pulling out the heavier weight or a part of the central region (801) in the center (703) of the spherical mobile sensor (100), towards the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100). By adjusting the distance of the heavier weight (801) from the center, the speed of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be adjusted as well. For example, further the heavier weight (801) from the center, slower the speed of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can become. Lowering the heavier weight (801) can cause the center of mass of the spherical mobile sensor (100) to be lowered and the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) to roll around the favorable axle (702). Thereby, the example embodiment described above and shown in the FIGS. 7-9 , can make the spherical mobile sensor (100) to roll around the favorable axle (702) on the preselected orientation with a stabilized speed, which could be useful for many of the instruments integrated into the spherical mobile sensor (100). For example, this feature could be useful when using a directed wireless antenna integrated inside the spherical mobile sensor (100) or when the camera is attached to the middle of the ball bearing (706) of the spherical mobile sensor (100).
[0046] In times, when the spherical sensor (100) is tumbling around, the blocking structure (306) can hold the center of mass in the center of the spherical mobile sensor (100) and create a torque for the sensor, and therefore, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can move by a minimum amount of force. However, whenever the spherical sensor (100) needs to stop, the heavier weight (801) in the center (703) could fall from the center towards the inner skin (103) touching the ground as shown in FIG. 8 . This can bring the center of mass down and could cause the spherical mobile sensor (100) to suddenly stop decelerate rapidly. On the other hand, if there is a hazardous object along the spherical mobile sensor's (100) path, the same weight (801) can fall down and act as a temporary pendulum in order to forcefully change the direction or get around an obstacle. On the other hand, by adjusting position of the heavier weight (801) relative to the center of the spherical mobile sensor (100), speed of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be adjusted as well. The lower the controller (307) of the spherical sensor (100) can bring the weight (801), the slower the spherical mobile sensor (100) can get. Adjusting distance of the heavier weight (701) from the center or the blocking structure (306), from the center and the ground, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can roll in a steady speed and in a stabilized way. Additionally, if a lens of a camera or any other imager is attached to the internal structure of the ball bearings (701), the lens can stay steady and straight whenever the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) is rolling. By adjusting the stiffness of the grip of the structure around the ball bearing (701), the controller (307) can make the rolling spherical sensor (100) to “brake” and decelerate as well.
[0047] In the example embodiments of FIGS. 6 and 7 , if the central region (703) and the movable weights (305) can be made from magnets and therefore, a fixed centralized magnetic field could be created by laminating a coil inside the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100). Therefore, when the outer layer (101) containing the coils rolls around the favorable axle (702), with the fixed centralized magnetic field (based on the Faraday's law) some electricity and power can be generated. The induced power, could be stored in the internal battery or a capacitor of the spherical mobile sensor (100). The internal battery or a capacitor could be located in the middle of the controller (703), or distributed around the inner skin (103) or the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100). Thin film batteries, for example “rechargeable thin film lithium ion batteries” embedded inside the structure of the inner skin (103) or the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be used as well.
[0048] FIGS. 1A and 2-9 show the example embodiment the spherical mobile sensor (100) in the inflated state. The spherical mobile sensor (100) could be deflated as well, before its deployment in an area of interest. As mentioned previously, the one or more diffuser capsules (304), shown in FIG. 3 , can contain an inert gas, for example, liquid or solid nitrogen or helium and the cap of the one or more diffuser capsules (304) could be triggered and broken using a NSI (or any other pyrotechnic tool) in order to release the inert gas inside the capsule. The one or more pairs of the disseminator canisters (206), shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 , can carry, for example two components (e.g. “isoyanates” and “polyols”) to create polyurethane elastomers, which can be used to fill the outer layer (101) of the wind opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensor (100). The “isoyanates” and “polyols” can be carried separately in each disseminator canisters from the pair of disseminator canisters (206). As mentioned previously, the one or more pairs of disseminator canisters (206) can use, for example, a NASA standard initiator (NSI) or other pyrotechnic tools to trigger or break caps of the one or more pairs of disseminator canisters (206) in order to release its content.
[0049] While deflated, all the components inside the inner layer (102), the inner skin (103) and the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100), for example, the tubes (308), the control mechanism (303) and the rigidizable tightening rings (301) can be in a folded and flattened state inside the outer skin (104) of the spherical sensor, where the outer skin can act like a spherical shaped plastic bag carrying the all the components on and inside the inner layer (102), inner skin (103) and the outer layer (101). In a deflated state, the inner layer (102) can be deprived of any inner gas or air and the outer layer (101) can be without any elastomer polymers. Depending on the circumstances and applications, if the spherical mobile sensor (100) need to be inflated, the NSI cap of the diffuser capsules (304) can be broken and the inert gas inside the diffuser capsules (304), for example, nitrogen gas, can be released and consequently, can fill out and inflate the inner layer (102) of the spherical sensor (100) to a spherical shape. The release of the inner gas form the diffuser capsules (304) can cause an over-inflation and can stress the inner skin (103) and the tightening rings (301) laminated inside the inner layer (102), as shown in FIG. 4 . This way the inner layer (102) can be inflated to a tight sphere.
[0050] There are other known skills of art that could be used to inflate the spherical mobile sensor (100), for example, passing electricity through the carbon-fiber inside the inner layer (102), in order to make the inner layer (103) mechanically stiffed and inflated. This technique (passing electricity through the carbon-fiber in order to make it stiff) could be used to control and adjust the stiffness of the spherical mobile sensor (100). In addition to stressing the tightening rings (301), this process of inflating the inner layer (103) of the spherical sensor can stress out the plurality of the sensors and the electronics laminated on the inner skin (103) and can therefore make them firmly hold their pre-designed shape and position inside the spherical mobile sensor (100). Additionally, the nitrogen or air filled interior of the inflated spherical mobile sensor (100) can help the spherical mobile sensor (100) to become more bouncy. Once the inner skin (103) is fully inflated, the caps of the one or more disseminator canisters (206) can be triggered using NSI to release the “isoyanates” and the “polyols” in the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100). The combination of “isoyanates” and “polyols” can cause a polymerization reaction, which may create the polyurethane elastomer used, for example, to fill out the outer layer (101) of the spherical sensor.
[0051] In accordance with the present disclosure, FIGS. 1-9 illustrate the example embodiments of the spherical mobile sensor (100) and its internal skeleton with control mechanism (105). As discussed previously, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can use the power stored in its batteries in order to move around and perform various tasks such as sensing, operating controlling mechanism, data processing and communication. Moreover, as presented in the previous sections, the mass and the diameter of the wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensor (100) can be customized in order to allow the spherical mobile sensor (100) to exploit the natural ambient forces, for example, speed of the wind (in the environment where the sensor (100) is deployed) to move and harvest energy for its mobility. Additionally, as mentioned above, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can use a combination of its internal propulsion and control mechanism (as shown in FIGS. 1, 3, 7, 8 and 9 ) and/or external ambient forces to adjust its center of the mass and therefore control its movement (e.g. initiate moving or stopping), speed (e.g. accelerating or decelerating), direction (e.g. change trajectory to avoid hazardous objects or areas, or get closer to an object or area of interest), and orientation (e.g. rotate the spherical structure to a preset favorable side). The spherical mobile sensor (100) can be used indoor as well, if there is enough power available in its batteries required for its internal propulsion and mechanical system to operate.
[0052] The spherical mobile sensor (100) can be benefited from the ambient resources if deployed and implemented in the environments such as large deserts, polar regions (e.g. the Arctic, Antarctica, vast tundra and permafrost) or open seas, where the ambient resources, for example, high speed winds or sea-currents, can be exploited by the spherical mobile sensor (100) for its locomotion and energy harvesting. Moreover, the large deserts, polar regions or open seas are vast flat regions devoid of human population and infrastructures with plenty of ambient resources, which can be exploited by the spherical mobile sensor (100) for its traversibility and energy harvesting. By way of example and not of limitation, the sensor (100) can integrate solar arrays in its outer layer (101) to harvest energy from available sunlight. Additionally, the sensor (100) can use its internal mechanics (as previously described and shown in the FIGS. 6, 7, and 8 ), to harvest kinetic energy from its own motions by the downward rolling gravity, wind, or sea currents. Some special polymers, for example, triboelectric (which can generate or produce electricity by harnessing friction between surfaces) or self-charging power cell (SCPC) (which can harvest mechanical energy more efficiently than systems using separate generators and batteries) can be embedded inside the outer layer (101) to generate power by harvesting the vibration and motion caused by the motions and tumbling of the spherical mobile sensor (100).
[0053] Moreover, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can exploit temperature differences available when deployed in the regions, for example, large deserts, polar regions or open seas, in order to harvest energy using thermopile (thermoelectric converter or TEC, which would convert the temperature differences to electric voltage) and the known skills of the art in thermoelectricity techniques. Some of the temperature differences that could be available if the spherical mobile sensor (100) is deployed in the example environments mentioned above are: the diurnal temperature differences in the deserts and polar regions (up to 40° C. differences), the extreme cold in the polar regions, the heat that could be generated by integrating tiny RHUs (radioisotope heater units weight less than 40 grams and can generate 250° C. heat) insulated by aerogels or the temperature differences between the warmer outer layer (101) (which could be made of polymers that could become warm under the direct sun in the open seas) and the colder water of the sea underneath its surface. Additionally, a layer of fujifilm with very high-efficiency thermoelectric (which could generate several milliwatts and can capable of generating electricity with a temperature difference of 1° C.) for example, as discussed in reference [2], could be embedded inside the outer layer (101) or on the control mechanism (103) inside the inner layer (102) to harvest power and generate electricity.
[0054] The mass and diameter of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can vary depending on the application and environment where the spherical sensor (100) is deployed, and the presence of an internal power source and mobility drive. For example, if the spherical sensor (100) is deployed in the Arctic region where for example, 75% of the time the average wind speed is 6 m/s and 25% of the time the average wind speed is 9 m/s, then if it is assumed that the spherical sensor (100) depends entirely on wind for mobility and power harvesting, and there is no other internal source of power and internal mobility drive inside the spherical sensor (100), the mass and the diameter of the spherical sensor (100) can be customized in order to make it suitable for moving with the wind speed of the 6 m/s. An already mobile spherical sensor (100) may require less wind speed to maintain its motion compared to a spherical sensor (100) which has started moving from a stationary state, since the coefficient of friction in a moving object is less compared to a stationary object. Additionally, the distribution of torque due to the spherical shape of the sensor (100) can help the spherical sensor (100) to move as well.
[0055] As well known in the art, that the force of wind on a body can be represented as F=½ρν2ACd, where ρ=1.4 kg/m3 is the typical density of the air in most areas on earth, ν is the velocity of the wind, A is the area that the body projects to the wind and Cd is the “coefficient of drag”. As also well known in the art, that the force require to overcome the friction and move a stationary object can be represented as F=μmg, where μ is the coefficient of friction (for example, the coefficient of friction of a smooth finish polyurea (highly water and tensile resistant elastomer) coating on the spherical mobile sensor (100) over a hard surface (ice) can be 0.14), m is the mass, and g is the gravitational acceleration (on Earth it is 9.8 m/s2). Therefore, in order for the spherical sensor (100) to move from a stationary position, it is require that the force exerted on the spherical mobile sensor (100) by the wind exceed the force needed to overcome friction or ½ρν2ACd>μmg. Now assuming a wind speed of 6 m/s (average speed of wind in Arctic at 75% of the time), A=πr2 (area of a sphere) and Cd=0.47 (coefficient of drag for sphere), the approximate masses of the spherical mobile sensor (with a polyurea finish on the ice or a rubber finish over the snow) for different diameters can be calculated from the equation ½ρν2ACd>μmg. Some examples of this calculation are described in tables 1-5.
[0056]
| TABLE 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter and Mass of the spherical mobile sensor | |||
| (100), using polyUrea finish over hard ice | |||
| Speed of Wind: | 6 | m/s | |
| Density of Atmosphere: | 1.4 | kg/m3 | |
| Coefficient of Friction | 0.14 | pulyUrea over hard ice | |
| Coefficient of Drag: | 0.47 | Sphere | |
| Gravitational acceleration | 9.8 | m/s2 | |
| Diameter of the Moball | 100 | cm | |
| Radius of the Moball | 0.5 | m | |
| Mass of the Moball | 6.776632653 | kg | |
[0057]
| TABLE 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter and Mass of the spherical mobile | |||
| sensor (100), rubber on wet snow | |||
| Speed of Wind: | 6 | m/s | |
| Density of Atmosphere: | 1.4 | kg/m3 | |
| Coefficient of Friction | 0.3 | rubber on west snow | |
| Coefficient of Drag: | 0.47 | Sphere | |
| Gravitational acceleration | 9.8 | m/s2 | |
| Diameter of the Moball | 100 | cm | |
| Radius of the Moball | 0.5 | m | |
| Mass of the Moball | 3.162428571 | kg | |
[0058]
| TABLE 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter and Mass of the spherical mobile | |||
| sensor (100), rubber on wet snow | |||
| Speed of Wind: | 6 | m/s | |
| Density of Atmosphere: | 1.4 | kg/m3 | |
| Coefficient of Friction | 0.3 | rubber on west snow | |
| Coefficient of Drag: | 0.47 | Sphere | |
| Gravitational acceleration | 9.8 | m/s2 | |
| Diameter of the Moball | 120 | cm | |
| Radius of the Moball | 0.6 | m | |
| Mass of the Moball | 4.553897143 | kg | |
[0059]
| TABLE 4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter and Mass of the spherical mobile sensor | |||
| (100), using polyUrea finish over hard ice | |||
| Speed of Wind: | 6 | m/s | |
| Density of Atmosphere: | 1.4 | kg/m3 | |
| Coefficient of Friction | 0.14 | pulyUrea over hard ice | |
| Coefficient of Drag: | 0.47 | Sphere | |
| gravitational acceleration | 9.8 | m/s2 | |
| Diameter of the Moball | 120 | cm | |
| Radius of the Moball | 0.6 | m | |
| Mass of the Moball | 9.75835102 | kg | |
[0060]
| TABLE 5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter and Mass of the spherical mobile sensor | |||
| (100), using polyUrea finish over hard ice | |||
| Speed of Wind: | 6 | m/s | |
| Density of Atmosphere: | 1.4 | kg/m3 | |
| Coefficient of Friction | 0.14 | pulyUrea over hard ice | |
| Coefficient of Drag: | 0.47 | Sphere | |
| gravitational acceleration | 9.8 | m/s2 | |
| Diameter of the Moball | 150 | cm | |
| Radius of the Moball | 0.75 | m | |
| Mass of the Moball | 15.24742347 | kg | |
[0061] From the above table it can be concluded that, a relatively heavier spherical mobile sensor (100) (for example, 15.247 kg) may require either an increased diameter (for example, 150 am) or an additional power source and internal mobility drive compared to a lighter sensor (100) (for example, 3.162 kg with a diameter of 100 cm) in order to move by an average wind speed of 6 m/s. Another option could be to move the relatively heavier spherical sensor (100) by the wind of higher speed, for example, 9 m/s, while not making any changes to the diameter and the other internal component of the spherical sensor (100). In that case, the spherical mobile sensor (100) could stay mobile for 25% of the time instead of 75% of the time, compared to be moved by the wind of the speed of 6 m/s.
[0062] The following tables 6-9 show some example design of the spherical mobile sensor (100) with different materials.
[0063]
| TABLE 6 | ||
|---|---|---|
| The spherical mobile sensor (100) density calculation | ||
| using TRYMER ® 1800 | ||
| Foam density (TRYMER ® 1800): | 28.8 | kg/m3 |
| The Spherical Mobile Sensor (100) Diameter: | 100 | cm |
| Outer layer (101) thickness: | 5 | cm |
| Hollow inner layer (102) Diameter: | 90 | cm |
| The Spherical Mobile Sensor (100) Volume: | 522500 | cm3 |
| The Spherical Mobile Sensor (100) | 0.52 | m3 |
| Hollow inner layer (102) Volume: | 381415 | cm3 |
| Hollow inner layer (102)e Volume: | 0.38 | m3 |
| Outer layer (101) Volume: | 141085 | cm3 |
| Outer layer (101) Volume: | 0.14 | cm3 |
| Outer layer (101) Mass: | 4.06 | kg |
[0064]
| TABLE 7 | ||
|---|---|---|
| The spherical mobile sensor (100) density | ||
| calculation using metallic microlattice | ||
| Foam density (Metallic microlattice): | 2.1 | kg/m3 |
| The Spherical Mobile Sensor (100) Diameter: | 100 | cm |
| Outer layer (101) thickness: | 5 | cm |
| Hollow inner layer (102) Diameter: | 90 | cm |
| The Spherical Mobile Sensor (100) Volume: | 522500 | cm3 |
| The Spherical Mobile Sensor (100) | 0.52 | m3 |
| Hollow inner layer (102) Volume: | 381415 | cm3 |
| Hollow inner layer (102)e Volume: | 0.38 | m3 |
| Outer layer (101) Volume: | 141085 | cm3 |
| Outer layer (101) Volume: | 0.14 | cm3 |
| Outer layer (101) Mass: | .30 | kg |
[0065]
| TABLE 8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| The spherical mobile sensor (100) inner | |||
| skin mass calculation using kepton | |||
| Material: | Kapton | ||
| Skin (103) Thickness: | 10 | mils | |
| Skin (103) Thickness: | 0.0254 | cm | |
| Outer layer (101) Surface area: | 31415 | cm2 | |
| Skin (103) Volume: | 797.9 | cm3 | |
| Kapton's Density: | 1.42 | gm/cm3 | |
| Outer layer (101) Surface area: | 100 | cm | |
| Skin (103) Mass: | 1133.1 | gm | |
| Skin (103) Mass: | 1.13 | kg | |
[0066]
| TABLE 9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tightening rings (301) using Carbon-Fiber | |||
| Number of (Tightening rings (301): | 4 | Number | |
| Length (diameter): | 314 | cm | |
| (Tightening rings (301) Width: | 2 | cm | |
| (Tightening rings (301) Thickness: | 0.15 | cm | |
| Density: | 1.65 | gm/cm3 | |
| Mass per (Tightening rings (301): | 155.43 | ||
| Total mass: | 621.72 | gm | |
| Total mass: | 0.62 | kg | |
[0067] Based on the known skills of the art, one can estimate an approximate amount of power (energy) that could be harvested using different techniques (as discussed above) by the wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensor (100). Some examples of such estimations can be found in reference [3], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In reference [3], the summary of power vs. volume has been given for some of the recent power scavengers (primarily inertial and thermal), highlighting the different transduction technologies, including piezoelectric (PE), electromagnetic (EM), electrostatic (ES), and thermoelectric (TE). The size and power level of these scavengers can vary over a large range, depending on the application area and available technologies for a specific scavenger. Smaller size scavengers can produce approximately 10-100 μw/cm3, while larger scavengers can produce approximately 100 μW to several mW/cm3. Since, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be as large as 20-50 cm in diameter, it can be expected that the spherical mobile sensor (100) can harvest as much as several watts. Although, this energy scavenging may not be continuous. For example, if it is assumed that the spherical mobile sensor (100) can harvest energy and therefore can generate power for only 1 hour a day, then with the rate mentioned above, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can harvest as much as 3000-4000 Joules of energy. The energy harvested this way could be used to operate the internal components and control mechanism of the spherical mobile sensor (100).
[0068] As mentioned previously, a spherical mobile sensor (100) can be implemented as an autonomous instrument capable of performing various tasks using different electronics, micro-devices and the imagers integrated on the inner skin (103) and the outer layer (101), while traversing the area where it is deployed. Depending on the types of sensors, instruments and other components integrated into the spherical mobile sensor (100), it can perform different tasks. For example, using different imagers and its stabilizing components as described previously, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can take pictures or videos using different active and passive sensors or spectrometers (some example spectrometers can be found in reference [4], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), it can identify and measure different environmental factors and conditions (e.g. wind patterns, topography of the area, temperature, pressure, etc.), chemical compositions, pollutants, gases, radiations (using Geiger tube [β, γ] (Beta and Gamma)), minerals, vibration, cracks, mass detectors and the type of snow or crystals for the minerals around (using ultrasound sensors bellow, or miniature mass spectrometer (MMS)). Some example sensors can be found in reference [4], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0069] According to the example embodiments of the present disclosure, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can use acoustic, infrared, metal detectors (for example, the inductive sensors as described in reference [5], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), or other sensors used in the known state-of-the art minesweepers (some examples of such sensors can be found in reference [6], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) to detect and map landmines. The spherical mobile sensor (100) can use various known skills in the art, for example, ultrasonic detectors, radar, vibration (some examples of such sensors can be found in references [4]-[20], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) and acoustic detectors to detect and monitor movements, vibrations, or various objects such as sea-mines, submarines, animals, etc. The spherical mobile sensor (100) can be equipped with various tools or robotics coming out of its structure in order to perform specific tasks, for example, cutting wires in landmine fields etc. The spherical mobile sensor (100) can be made of very heavy materials to explode the landmines in its place.
[0070] In accordance with the present disclosure, the example embodiments of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be used to clean up oil or chemical pollutant spills as well. The outer layer (101) of the sensor (100) can be made of sorbent materials in order to remove oil or chemical pollutant spillages either by adsorption (the oil adheres to the surface of the material) or by absorption (the oil penetrates the pores of the material and is trapped inside). For example, the outer layer (101) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be made out of foams such as highly oil-absorbent polyurethane foam (PUF) materials or microorganism-immobilized polyurethane foams, which could absorb and degrade the oil spillages. Some examples of such foams could be found in reference [23], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Additionally, the disseminator canisters (206) and tubular ring (302) could be filled with bioremediation bacteria (such as microbial xenobiotic metabolism to degrade, transform or accumulate oil droplets), which can eat oil. The disseminator canisters (206) and tubular ring (302) could be filled with chemical dispersants (for example corexit 9500A), to break down the oil in the water into small droplets. The spherical mobile sensor (100) can be equipped with spectrometers or other sensors which can detect oil drops, and if any spillage gets detected, it can trigger the cap of the disseminator canisters (206) and consequently, the contents of the disseminator canisters (206) and the attached tubular ring (302) can be released in the foam at the outer layer (101). When the spherical mobile sensor (100) is rolling around on the oil spilled area of the sea, the bioremediation bacteria or the chemical dispersants soaked foam at the outer layer (101), can spread the bioremediation bacteria or the chemical dispersants around the area, which can help to resolve the oil spillage.
[0071] Moreover, in accordance with the present disclosure, the example embodiments of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can have processing and communication capabilities as well. The spherical mobile sensor (100) can use, for example, a PCI-based 750 MHz PowerPC system as its microprocessor (202) (for its internal processing and computation), LM629 precision motion micro controller chip (to act as its controller (307)), and radiation hardened memory (which could be less susceptible to damages from radiation). The spherical mobile sensor (100) can communicate by using antenna and transceiver (203). As mentioned previously, the axles the in the control mechanism (303), the spokes (208) (in the FIG. 2 ) and/or the tightening rings (301) can be used as antennas as well. Moreover, if the example embodiment of the control mechanism of FIGS. 7-9 is used for the spherical mobile sensors (100), then the inner skeleton (105) and therefore any antenna that would be integrated inside the inner skeleton (105) wouldn't move when the outer layer (101) rolls. This feature of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be utilized in using direct antennas, which could be very helpful as it would save energy when the spherical mobile sensor (100) communicates wirelessly with the communication satellites or base stations.
[0072] The spherical mobile sensor (100), according the example embodiments of the present disclosure, can use low-power and low-mass transceivers (203) and modems in order to have a peer-to-peer communication with other sensors (100) in the area where they are deployed. Additionally, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can communicate with an orbiting satellite or a base station as well. For example, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can use waspmote transceivers (which weighs 20 gm, and its operational temperature is −20° C., +65° C.), in order to have a peer-to-peer communication with other wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensors (100), or an iridium modem (for example, iridium core 9523, weight 32 gm and operation temperature is −30° C. to +70° C.) which can help the spherical mobile sensor (101) to have communication with, for example, a iridium satellite system with a pole-to-pole global coverage. Some example transceivers can be found in reference [4], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0073] In accordance with the present disclosure, the example embodiments of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can perform calculations, computations, processing tasks and it can receive, send, or relay commands, information and messages, which can help the sensor (100) to perform its tasks and responsibilities safely, optimally and intelligently. For example, if the spherical mobile sensor (100) receives a command, which provides the sensor with a priority of tasks needed to be done in an area of interest, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can use its microprocessor (202) and controller (307) to control the operation of its internal sensors, instruments, and actuators in order to perform the tasks as instructed.
[0074] The spherical mobile sensor (100), according the example embodiments of the present disclosure, can receive information about the wind pattern and weather forecast of the area where it is deployed or if there is any obstacle or hazardous objects in the area of its performance, which should be avoided. Using the micro-processors (202), controllers (307) and actuators, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can decide to stop (for example, by bringing all its weights down, or by getting deflated from an inflated state) or change its trajectory if possible. For example, if the spherical mobile sensor (100) receives a message, which instructs the sensor (100) to go to a certain area of interest, spherical mobile sensor (100) could do so by checking its current location, the wind direction (using its wind sensors or the data regarding the wind pattern that could have been sent to it by other neighboring sensors or satellite or a base station) and the location of its destination. If the direction of the wind at that moment is favorable with respect to the spherical mobile sensors (100) destination (i.e. the wind direction can help the sensor (100) to move towards its destination), the spherical mobile sensor (100) can utilize the speed and direction of the wind to drive its locomotive towards its destination. Otherwise the sensor (100) can use its actuators to stop and wait until a wind in the desired direction blows and then, if the sensor is at stationary state, it can bring its center of mass up or get inflated to move by the favorable wind direction to its desired destination. On the other hand, depending on how far the desired destination is, and how much power is left in the sensor's (100) rechargeable batteries, the spherical mobile sensor (100) might decide to use its control mechanism (303) to move towards the desired destination. Since, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be controlled, to go to an desire area or can be stopped to avoid an undesired direction or area, they could be able to kept inside an area of interest, while they are still moving around in the that specific area to perform some specific tasks (For example monitoring the area, cleaning up the oil spills in the area, looking for landmines or the minerals of interest in the specific area).
[0075] According to an example embodiment of the present disclosure, FIGS. 10-11 show a system of sensors (1000) comprising a plurality of spherical mobile sensors (100). As mentioned previously each spherical mobile sensor (100) can be configured to have a peer-to-peer communication (1001) capability with other spherical mobile sensors (100) within the system of sensors. Therefore, a plurality of peer-to-peer connected wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensors (100) can form a network of sensors within the system of sensors (1000). Moreover, each spherical mobile sensor (100) within the system of sensors (1000) can have communication capabilities (1002) with base stations (1003) for example, ground base stations, vehicles, ships, aircraft, balloons, submarines, buoys, personnel's laptops, or orbiting satellites. The system of sensors (1000) can comprise a controllable dynamic wireless mesh network of spherical mobile sensors, as illustrated in FIGS. 10-11 . The controllable dynamic wireless mesh network of spherical mobile sensors (1000) as illustrated in FIGS. 10-11 could interface with a global control system that can ensure a region-wide coverage while optimizing the wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensors' (100) efforts by sharing the tasks and responsibilities (e.g. sensing the environment, tracking targets, communication with the base stations (1003), etc.) among them intelligently according to their available resources (for example, power, memory, bandwidth, structure's endurance, chemicals that need to be spread out, etc.), quality of performance of the entire system of sensors (1000) (for example, how soon or with what resolution the system is able to scan the whole are of interest), and the priority of the sub-regions with high strategic value or urgency for the stakeholders. Scanning an area can be defined as the following actions by the mobile sensors while passing through the area: (a) Examining the area (using its sensors and instruments) to detect and locate the possible targets, and (b) Updating the map of the area which would be collectively updated by wireless mesh network of sensors (1000).
[0076] Tables 10-11 illustrate the calculations and specification for the communication level inside the controllable dynamic wireless mesh network of wind-opportunistic spherical mobile sensors (1000). Although the level of communication required by the collaborative task sharing strategies of the spherical mobile sensor (100) may be power-intensive, the spherical mobile sensor (100) could be programmed to keep expensive satellite communications to a minimum, and use very-low power micro-RF techniques for peer-to-peer communication. Different calculations can show that with reasonable power consumption such communication between different spherical mobile sensors (100) can take place over distances more than 100 km for low data rates, for example, 100 Kb/s. The wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensor's (100) ability to autonomously communicate with its peers and exchange information about its operational status, and the environmental data it has gathered, can be critical since that exchange of information constitutes the basic link unifying the controllable dynamic wireless mesh network of wind-opportunistic spherical mobile sensors (1000). Since the expected energy scavenging level per day for the wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensor (100) is approximately 30,000-40,000 Joules, the maximum power consumption of the transceiver in each the wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensors (100) is designed to be less than 100 mW, which is equivalent to more than 100 hours of consecutive peer-to-peer communication. In order to increase the communication distance with a reasonable data rate, quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) can be used as a modulation technique for both uplink and downlink communication. QPSK can provide a spectral efficiency of about 1.6 bits/Hz and requires a SNR of at least 14 dB for a bit-error-rate (BER) of at most 10-6. In order to maximize the propagation distance given an antenna size of less than 10 cm (which is guaranteed to be smaller than the diameter of the wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensor (100)), the 433 to 434 MHz frequency band available for ISM applications is the most suitable once. Based on this selection, the link budget can be calculated as shown in table 11. The maximum communication distance is estimated to be 100 km with a maximum date rate of 320 kb/s. The expected number of wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensors (100) can be in the order of 1000 for a global coverage exceeding 10 Mkm2. However, this number may be higher to increase the overall robustness of the system when considering possible failures of some of the wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensors (100) in the field due to rare but extreme environmental conditions such as extreme winds or snow storms.
[0077]
| TABLE 10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Rate Estimation | |||
| Data Rate Estimation for 433 MHz ISM band (433.05-434.79 MHz) | |||
| Parameter | Value | Comments | |
| Efficiency in bits/Hz | ~1.6 | ||
| Required SNR for BER = 10−6 | ~14 | dB | |
| (QPSK) | |||
| Bandwidth | 200 | kHz | |
| Data Rate | 320 | kbps | Bandwidth * 1.6 bit/Hz |
[0078]
| TABLE 11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Expected performance of the distributed mobile sensor system | |||
| Link Budget for 433 MHz band (433.05-434.79 MHz) | |||
| Parameter | Value | Comments | |
| Bandwidth (BW) | 200 | KHz | |
| Transmit Power (PTX) | 20 | dBm | Typical power of 100 mW |
| Transmit Antenna Gain | 5 | dBi | Typical Omni-directional |
| antenna | |||
| Receive Antenna Gain | 5 | dBi | Typical Omni-directional |
| antenna | |||
| Max. Path Distance | 100 | km | |
| Path Loss (100 km) | 127 | dB | L ( dB ) = 10 log ( 4 πf c c ) 2 + 20 log(D) + Atmosphere attenuation |
| Received Power | −97 | dBm | |
| Received Sensitivity Required | ~100 | dBm | |
| Thermal Noise Power | −121 | dBm | Thermal Noise seen |
| (300 K) | by receive antenna | ||
| Receiver Noise Figure | 4 | dB | |
| SNR of received signal | 20 | dB | |
| Error Correction Gain | 4 | dB | |
| SNR for BER = 10−6 (QPSK) | 14 | dB | |
| Link Margin | 10 | dB | |
[0079] In accordance with the presented disclosure, the example embodiment of FIG. 12 shows the distributed control architecture (1200) of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000). The Distributed Control Architecture (1200) makes use of the controllable dynamic wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) to transmit the control signals and commands and to receive measurements and data from the spherical mobile sensors (100). As described previously the spherical mobile sensors (100) can be configured to be stopped (1203), or keep going (1204) either by using different rigidizable structures, or different example embodiments of the control mechanism (303) presented in previous sections. Also, as previously described, the mass, diameter, as well as the control mechanism (303) can be customized according to applications and environment conditions in the area (for example, the speed of the wind, the speed of the current, the density of the water, and the density of the atmosphere, etc.), where the sensor (100) is deployed. Therefore, as mentioned previously, if a spherical mobile sensor (100) receives a command to stop (1203), it can be able to do so, by either deflating, or bringing its center of mass down in order to stop. On the other hand if the spherical mobile sensor (100) receives a command to keep-going (1204), it can keep its center of mass in the center, can stay inflated and can use either its internal or external propulsion system (for example (control mechanism (303)) in order to keep, or resume its movement.
[0080] As previously described, the stop (1203) and keep-going (1204) capabilities of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be used to restrict the spherical mobile sensor (100) in any given area. The control mechanism (303) can provide more than stop and go functionalities. In particular, the control mechanism (303) can change the trajectory of the spherical mobile sensor (100), for example, to the left or to the right, by bringing the center of the mass to the left side or to the right side of the spherical mobile sensors (100), while it is moving. Trajectory can be changed by using sails or air controlling tools as well. For example, if outside air is pumped inside the sensor (100) from one side of the spherical mobile sensor (100) and the air inside the sensor (100) is pumped out from another side, based on the reaction forces, the sensor's (100) trajectory can be changed to left or right. According to the example embodiments of the present disclosure, the stop (1203) command received by the spherical mobile sensors (100) can be assumed as command for either complete stop or change of direction and keep-going (1204) command received by the spherical mobile sensors (100) can be interpreted as either resuming the movement from a standstill condition by the internal propulsion mechanism or external forces, or keep going if the spherical mobile sensors (100), is already moving.
[0081] The distributed control architecture (1200), as shown in the example embodiment of FIG. 12 , can ensure that the spherical mobile sensors (100) cover a specific sub region grid (1201) uniformly in terms of the number of sensors (100) and their available resources (e.g. memory, energy, bandwidth, the chemicals that they might need to spread) while considering the priority ranking (1202) of the sub region grid (1201) as well. The sub region grids (1201) could be defined by the stakeholders of the system in order to cluster the efforts and the performance of the entire wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) based on the importance of that region, or based on some specific environmental characteristics that can make the region preferable over other sub region grids (1201). For those stake holders that use the controllable dynamic wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) as a scanner, which can map a larger area in order to search for some particular target or in order to monitor the area, by dividing the larger region into smaller sub region grids (1201), can use a divide and conquer strategy for distributing the mobile sensors (100) and increasing the speed of the sensor system (1000).
[0082] The priority ranking (1202) of each sub region grid (1201) can be the level of importance (in terms of monitoring) of each sub region grid (1201) as determined by the system's stakeholders. The priority ranking (1202) of each sub region grid (1201) could be set by the events happening in that sub region grid (1201). When the priority ranking (1202) of a region is set to a higher level, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can reconfigure itself to provide more resources to that sub region grid (1201). For example, if the stake holder of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) is interested in finding some kind of a mineral, the sub region grids (1201) with higher percentage of signs of the minerals can be given a higher priority ranking (1202). As a result, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can focus on sub region grids (1201) that have a higher chance of finding the mineral of the interest.
[0083] Moreover, the distributed control architecture (1200) of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000), as illustrated in FIG. 12 , can consider the rate of energy generation of each spherical mobile sensor (100) in each sub region grid (1201) as well. For example, based on the amount of sunlight the sensors (100) could be exposed to or the strength of the wind in that sub region grid (1201), the spherical mobile sensors (100) in each sub region grid (1201) might have varying potential for generating and harvesting energy. This variation could be considered in the distributed control architecture (1200) of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000).
[0084] The proper distribution of the sensors (100) inside the sub region grid (1201) with a high strategic value priority ranking (1202) can ensure that there are always enough sensors (100) to pick up the tasks that others have left off. For example, if the main task of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) is to monitor an area and track a moving target, and if the speed and direction of the spherical mobile sensor (100) tracking the target is such that it cannot keep up with the target, then the sensor (100) could broadcast the characteristics of the target (for example, its importance, speed, location, estimated trajectory) to other sensors (100) via peer-to-peer communication (1001). In this manner, sensors (100) on the path of the moving target can observe the target's appearance and can keep monitoring it. Additionally, the sub region grids (1201) that have been estimated to be along the trajectory of the moving target can be moved to a higher priority ranking (1202). This may cause more wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensors (100) with more resources to go to this sub region grid (1201) and be ready to monitor the moving target. For this purpose, as illustrated in FIG. 12 , the region of interest can divided into sub region grid (1201). Each of the sub regions can be assigned with a strategic priority ranking (1202) that rates its priority for monitoring purposes. FIG. 12 further illustrates black sub region grids (1201) representing no-go zones (1209) that can be desirable to be avoided by the wind-opportunistic controllable spherical mobile sensors (100).
[0085] The distributed control architecture (1200), as illustrated in the example embodiment of FIG. 12 , can be in charge of determining the optimum distribution of sensors (100) for all sub region grid (1201). This optimization can consider the following variables, for example, the total number of sensors (100), the total amount of available memory for the system of sensors (100), each sensor's (100) energy reserve, available bandwidth, harvested energy based on the sub region grid (1201) local conditions (e.g. wind intensity, available sunlight) and the sub region grid's (1201) ranking priority (1202). Depending on the application, more resources might be considered to be optimized over the entire system of sensors (1000). For example, if the sensors (100) are used to spread some bacteria over an area with oil spillage, the distributed control architecture (1200) can make sure that the available resources (i.e. oil eater bacteria) are optimized over the entire network of sensors (1000). The distributed control architecture (1200) might consider optimizing the available durability of the sensors (100) among the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) as well.
[0086] According to the example embodiment of FIG. 12 , the distributed control architecture (1200) can influence the base-stations (1003) or the satellites to send certain information, messages or instructions in a centralized manner to all or some specific sensors (100) using the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000). For example, a centralized order to avoid certain sub region grids can be given to the sensors (100) in a particular area by marking those sub-region grids a no-go-zone (1209) or by making the priority ranking (1202) of that those sub region grids (1201) be the lowest. Therefore, the sensors (100) can make sure that they would stop within a safe distance from the no-go-zone (1209) and will not enter the no-go-zone (1209). By way of another example, the sensors (100) can receive a centralized message which could provide them with the weather forecast and wind-direction for the next few days, which could help the sensors (100) to decide about their scanning strategies for the sub region grid (1201) they are in. For example, if the sensors receive a forecast of rain, the sensors (100) can realize that the power that could have been harvested through solar energy could be limited and therefore, they would avoid energy-consuming tasks such as taking pictures.
[0087] Moreover, the stakeholders of the entire wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) might decide that, all the sensors (100) in certain sub region grids (1201) can perform specific tasks according to priority and resolution. For example, a vessel which carries out a marine transportation in some areas in the Arctic, can use the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) to identify an open sea route towards its destination. In order to accrue this information, the vessel might send a centralized command to the sensors (100) used in the sub region grid (1201) to report the condition and the topography of ice in the sub region grid (1201) of interest before using their power on any other task or before getting away from the sub region grid (1201). Therefore, the distributed control architecture (1200) can make sure that the first priority of the sensors (100) is to report the condition of ice and ice topography to the vessel.
[0088] The distributed control architecture (1200) of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can ensure that the sensors (100) within each sub region grid (1201) would negotiate with each other in order to share tasks and optimize the use of local system resources. In each sub region grid (1201), there could be a dynamic supervising-peer (1208) that would recommend the major decisions needed to be made inside a sub region grid (1201). For example, the dynamic supervising-peer (1208) could decide if a sensors (100) which is about to leave the sub region grid (1201), could actually leave (1205) the sub region grid (1201), or it should stop (1203), and this decision can be made based on the condition of the wind or/and the sea current (the speed and the direction). On the other hand, if a sensor (100) is entering (1206) the sub region grid (1201), the level of resources of the entering sensor (100) and the variance of the resources available in the sub region grid (1201) compared to the variance of the entire resources available for the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can influence the decision of the dynamic supervising-peer (1208). For example, given the wind condition, if a sensor (100) enters (1205) a sub region grid (1201) with a resources very similar to the one leaving (1206) the sub region grid (1201), then the supervising-peer (1208) might let the sensor (1206) to leave the sub-region grid (1201). The dynamic supervising-peer (1208) could be selected, for example, based on its location in the topology of the existing sensors (100) in the sub region grid (1201) and its available resources (power, memory, bandwidth). The dynamic supervising-peer (1208) can be connected directly or through the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) to the other sensors (100) located anywhere inside the sub region grid (1201). Therefore, the supervising-peer (1208) could be dynamically changed if the previous supervising-peer (1208) passes the supervising-location and a new supervising-peer becomes close to the supervising-location (1208).
[0089] Additionally, The distributed control architecture (1200) can make sure that the sensors (100) inside a sub region grid (1201) can take a random turn to be a power and time consuming supervision-peer (1208) of the sub region grid (1201 to keep the total resources in the sub region grid (1201) balanced. The distributed control architecture (1200) could determine the supervising-location (1208) based on the previous experiences of the sensors (100) in the sub region grid (1201). Moreover, the sensors in a sub-region grid (1201), without a supervising-peer (1208), can negotiate with each other to decide if they should allow an outside sensor (100) to join them (1206) in the sub region grid (1201) or just pass by (1207). For example, the sensors in a sub-region grid (1201) might let an insider sensor (100) to leave (1205) the sub region grid (1201) for a neighboring sub region grid (1201). This way, it could be the responsibility of the sensor's (100) own internal controller (307) to either keep its position (1203) within a sub region grid (1201) or to move (1204) to a new designated sub region grid (1201). The controller (307) of a sensor (100) can take such decision by having access to the most updated resources and the topography of the existing the sensors (100) inside the sub region grid (1201), the condition of the wind, the number of sensors (100) inside the sub region grid (1201) which are about to leave (1205) and the number of sensors (100) which are about to enter (1206) the sub region grid (1201). Therefore, when a sensor (100) wants to make its decision, it could consider some percentage of probabilities for the current situation and if it is allowed to leave (1205) the sub region grid (1201) and enter the neighboring sub region grid (1201) or just pass by it.
[0090] In accordance with the example embodiments of the present disclosure, the wireless mesh network of spherical mobile sensors (1000) can use routing and low-power data handling protocols. Some examples of such protocols can be found in references [21] and [22], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The distributed control architecture of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can dynamically reconfigure itself in order to optimize the performance of the entire sensor system (1000). The distributed control architecture can be able to do this while operating in any (combination) of the following three modes: (i) as a centralized distributed system where the decisions can be made by a centralized station, (ii) as a decentralized distributed system where the neighboring sensors (100) can negotiate with each other in order to make a decision, and (iii) as a solo system where each sensor (100) can decide individually what should be done based on the goals of the whole system and the way it could survive.
[0091] As illustrated in the example embodiment of FIG. 12 , the distributed control architecture can based on two control commands; stop (1203) and keep-going (1204). The stop (1203) command can make a sensor (100) halt and anchor where it is, whereas the keep-going (1204) command can let the moving sensor (100) to continue along its wind-driven path. The area of interest can be divided into grids or sub region grid (1201). A sub region grid (1201) can be an unit of an area that could be covered by a cluster of sensors (100). Each grid could have the following characteristics: (i) a ranking weight value (RG) that represents the level of importance of the grid for the system's stakeholders (1202) (ii) the total number of sensors (100) (NG), (iii) the total available power (PG), (iv) the rate of energy generation (EG), (v) the available memory (MG), (vi) the available assigned bandwidth (BG) and (vi) available power, memory and bandwidth for each sensor (100) in the grid.
[0092] One goal of the distributed control architecture (1200), illustrated in the example embodiment of FIG. 12 , can be to minimize the variance of the system resources available to each of the sensors (100) in each sub region grid (1201). In other words, distributed control architecture (1200) can make the sensors (100) in each grid (1201) to be more or less uniform depending on the resources available to them and to the priority ranking of their sub region grid (1201). The variance of the different mobile sensor (100) resources is an example of a quality-of-service (QoS) function of the system resources that the distributed control architecture (1200) may want to optimize. However, the invention disclosed herein is not limited to this particular (QoS) and, depending on the application, one could define different (QoS) functions. More generally, the quality of service (QoS), assigned to each sub region grid (1201) can be a function of the total resources available to it, and would be normalized by the ranking of the sub region grid (1201) (e.g. QoS(G)=F(PG,EG,MG,BG)/RG). The sensors (100) in each sub region grid (1201) can negotiate with each other to come up with a task plan that cam maximize the (QoS(G)). The sensors (100) in each sub region grid (1201) can negotiate with each other to decide if they should allow an outside sensor (100) to join them in the sub region grid (1201) or just pass by. They may also let an insider sensor (100) to leave the sub region grid (1201) to a neighboring grid. Such signal could be given to an entering sensor (100) based upon (QoS(G)). Another goal of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could be to guarantee the uniformity of the (QoS) between different sub region grid (1201).
[0093] According to the example embodiments of the present disclosure, the initial spatial distribution of the mobile sensors (100) of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can be determined by using the existing wind circulation models, wind pattern maps, and topography maps. By performing extensive simulations using those maps, the sensors (100) released in different locations can be traced to come up with the best configurations that could make the distribution of sensors (100) uniform across the sub region grid (1201). With a stable wind and topography system, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could be able to rely on the wind circulation models and topography maps. In some cases, for example, in the Arctic, the surface topography of melting and freezing ice can change rapidly and unpredictably over seasonal changes which can make the existing topography model maps unreliable. As a result, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) might need to learn the wind vectors and the topography of the region from its own distributed sensors (100) across the area. By way of an example, a sensor (100) in the Arctic may know that the area which it is approaching is still covered by ice, since there were recently sensors (100) near the same location that reported the existence of ice in the area. Alternatively, a sensor (100) that is in a certain location can predict its near future location by referring to other sensors (100) that previously were there and with the same wind vector ended up to be in another location. The accuracy of an event's prediction (such as existence of ice in a location or where the sensor (100) might end up) is higher if: (i) the time that the event has occurred previously was not long ago, (ii) the location of the event occurred is not far away and (iii) the number of previous occurrences of the event and/or sensors (100) reporting the event were high. Therefore, the sensors (100) can constantly update the circulation patterns, topography, and importance/ranking of a region (based on the targets and events detected in the sub region grid (1201)), which could be used by the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000).
[0094] As illustrated in the example embodiment of FIG. 12 , if a certain sub region grid (1201) needs to be covered and monitored by some sensors (100), the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) might know what number of mobile sensors could be sufficient to satisfy and balance the stakeholder's monitoring expectations and limitations. Some of the expectations could include detecting certain events (e.g. change in the topography of the ice or detecting a certain pollutant) in a given period of time (e.g. less than 48 hours), or being able to lengthen the monitoring time of a certain event. Alternatively, when a target is detected, a sensor (100) might be asked to stop and monitor the event as long as it has enough power. In case, it goes almost out of power or memory, the sensor (100) can change shift with another passing sensor (100) with a full fresh battery and memory. If the stop and monitoring time is longer, more sensors (100) could be in the sub region grid (1201) to track the target.
[0095] According to the example embodiments of the present disclosure, a heads-up cooperation control strategy can be at the core of the distributed control strategy of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000). The heads up cooperation strategy can comprise of passing a measurement or monitoring task of a sensor (100) that can no longer perform its task adequately to the next most suitable sensor (100), or alerting the sensors (100) regarding certain events that could happen in near future. Therefore, the sensors (100) which have received the heads up could be cautious about using their resources (e.g. memory, power) in anticipation of tasks they might have to perform in future. Additionally, intelligent autonomous task allocation algorithms can reassign tasks to each spherical mobile sensor (100) (either locally or globally) in response to changes in the system capabilities or changes in the mission objectives. This can make the wireless mesh network of spherical mobile sensors (1000) highly responsive and adaptable. As a result, the spherical mobile sensors (100) can distribute tasks, data, computations, etc., and can cooperate with each other in intelligent ways. For example, if several spherical mobile sensors (100) sense that there are other sensors (100) in close proximity to each other, then the sensors in close proximity to one another can communicate with each other and share tasks. For example, among the sensors in close proximity to one another, one could measure the local temperature, the other the local vapor content, etc., thereby saving power for the entire sensor system (1000) and reducing data traffic. On the other hand, if for some reason highly reliable data is required, the spherical mobile sensors (100) can fuse their measurements (for example, by averaging) and can send accurate measurements to the base stations.
[0096] In accordance with the present disclose, the example embodiment of FIG. 13 illustrates another example embodiment of the distributed control architecture of the wireless mesh network of sensors (100) in sea. In case of the distributed control architecture of the example embodiment of FIG. 13 , in order to operate correctly, it might be useful for the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) to know the location of each sensor (100) at all times. For example, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) might need to know the location of a measurement taken by a sensor (100), or the coverage of a certain sub region grid (1201) by the sensors (100). In some embodiments of the distributed mesh network of sensors (100), GPS might be used to determine the location of the sensors (100). In the absence of GPS satellites, for example, in some parts of the Arctic, the sensors (100) can use a micro-gyroscope based on CMOS/MEMS technology to convey their location to the base station. The peer-to-peer (1001) communication link between the sensors (100) or between the sensors and the base stations (1003) can be used to measure the time of flight between (and hence the distance among) two sensors or between the sensors and the base station to perform a local autonomous triangulation and determine the position of the sensors (100).
[0097] Therefore, the position information along with the current wind patterns and information from the sensors (100) in the sub region grid (1201) can help the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) to predict the location of each sensor (100) and create a dynamically modifiable map of each sensor (100) locations. The sensors (100) in the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can have some degree of self-awareness. For example, each sensor (100) might know how much battery power they have, how full their memory is and what kind of events and regions (1201) they are encountering, etc. As described previously, each sensor (100) in the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can be able to broadcast the status of their parameters (for example, battery power, available memory etc.) and events to their neighboring sensors (100) and the base stations (1003) to give them heads up if necessary. Therefore, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can constantly update a global map of sensor (100) locations, along with the information about the available energy and memory resources of each sensor (100). This can facilitate the distribution of tasks, data, computations and cooperation between the sensors (100) in intelligent ways. Additionally, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can be scalable since the software of each sensor (100) can be upgraded and/or additional sensors (100) can be introduced to the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000), as long as the same network protocol is used for the newly introduced sensor (100).
[0098] As mentioned previously, each sensor (100) in the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) use the energy stored in its batteries to operate and perform various tasks. Since, energy stored in the batteries of each sensor can be harvested from ambient resources, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could be more energy efficient. Each sensor (100) in the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can have sensing, processing and communication (e.g. integrated antenna and modems) capabilities. Therefore, in the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) each sensor (100) can be configured to have peer-to-peer communications capabilities with other sensors (100) as well as communications capabilities with a base station (1003), ground vehicles, ships, aircraft or balloons, submarines, buoys, wireless networks in the area and orbiting satellites. Consequently, the sensor system (1000) can forward and relay messages, signals and commands among a communication network and therefore can create an intelligent network of task sharing in order to optimize the use of resources (power, memory, bandwidth, structure's endurance, etc.) for the entire wireless mesh network of sensors (1000). Additionally, by way of example and not of limitation, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can detect and track a wide range of targets (e.g. oil or gas spillage; oil and gas reservoir; valuable minerals; pollutants; environmental factors; moving objects such as animals, humans, submarines, or ships around; etc.), clean up oil spillage, explode objects, listen to outside communications and send various acoustic or radar signals. In particular, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can gather reliable data which can be used to draw more reliable inferences (for example, presence of some certain mineral, oil spillage, gas leakage, ice condition and topography in the polar regions, pollutants, fumes, temperature profiles etc.). The data gathered this way can be more reliable compared to other systems since the sensors (100) can aggregate their multiple measurements to obtain more accurate estimates (for example, by averaging their measurements).
[0099] According to the example embodiment of the present disclosure, the wireless mesh network of spherical mobile sensors (1000) can be robust since the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can function even if many individual sensors (100) stop operating. Any dis-functioning or broken individual sensors (100) can be replaced as required dependent on application/situation. Therefore, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can be replenished with new sensors (100) if desired. Size, mass and shape of the each sensor (100) can depend on the environment in which it is released. Moreover, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can be controlled from a base station and/or satellite, since the individual sensor's (100) movement and tasks can be controlled using its internal controller (307) where each sensor (100) can have peer-to-peer communication capabilities with other sensors (100) within the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) and/or a base computer or satellite (1003). More in particular, as mention above, movement and tasks/activities of each individual sensor within the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can be controlled either through a local decision of that mobile sensor's controller, negotiation among neighboring individual mobile sensors or through a centralized command from a base computer or a satellite.
[0100] In accordance with the present disclosure, the example embodiment of FIG. 14 shows deep sea and underwater communication (1401) between submarines, submarines and ships and submarines, satellite and aircraft as occurs in the open ocean using wireless mesh network of sensors (1000). The deep sea and underwater communication (1401) between submarines, submarines and ships and submarines and aircraft as occurs in the open ocean can be a challenging problem. One reason for these challenges could be the high power consumption during these communications and relatively short range of available sonar signals (1401). Another reason could be the absence of any wide-range communication infrastructure which is capable of transferring data and information between the air transportable communication (ATAC) and down-link communication (DLC) as a means of communication between an aircraft and a submarine, or between a ship and a submarine. Various types of floating sensors (for example, Argo-floats and Sonobuoys) could have a short lifespan due to their need for heavy batteries to drive their locomotion and to transmit sonar communication signals that are perceptible by nearby ships and submarines. The example embodiments of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) illustrated in the present disclosure, can serve as the infrastructure that facilitates underwater communications (1401) between the base stations on the surface (1002), ships or submarines shipped to the area, and deep sea sensors.
[0101] As described earlier in this disclosure, the spherical mobile sensors (100) can have GPS and can determine their locations. They can float on the surface of the water and can move via wind or water-current. The torque generated by the spherical mobile sensor's (100) internal structure (by appropriately moving the internal movable weights) can also allow the spherical mobile sensor (100) to move on their own using their internal battery power. The sensors (100) can be anchored (and made somewhat stationary) by deflating them using rigidizable structures as previously presented or change the form of the structure of the sensors (100) from an complete sphere to more oval or cylinder shape, in order to make it descend in water; Since the speed of the wind on the open sea can be 12-20 m/s but the speed of the current is less than 0.5 m/s, therefore by moving the sensors (100) down in the water the speed of the sensor (100) can be reduced as it wouldn't be projected to the blowing wind. Conversely, when necessary, or when conditions are suitable (e.g. wind or water current is in the right direction), the sensors (100) could be inflated to get to the surface of the sea since while inflated the density of the sensor (100) would be less. The inflated sensor (100) can be subjected to the blowing wind and therefore the sensor (100) could resume its wind and/or water current-driven motion. As a result, similar to what has been described earlier in this disclosure, the motion of the sensors (100) can be controlled either through a local decision of the sensors (100) internal controller, through negotiation among the neighboring sensors (100), or through a centralized command from the base (1003). Based on the Ekeman's law, there exists an angle of 45 degree between the wind direction and the direction of the water currents on the wind. Additionally, based on Ekeman's maw, more the sensors (100) would sink in the water the direction of the sensors (100) will change until about 100 m, where the current's direction would be almost the opposite direction from the wind. The distributed control architecture (1200) can use this principle to control the direction and the speed of the sensors (100) and their distribution in the sub region grid (2001).
[0102] According to the example embodiments of the present disclosure, the spherical mobile sensors (100) can also survey the weather and water conditions on the surface of the sea. Since the sensors (100) can have sensing, as well as transmission and reception capabilities (both sonar and RF), the spherical mobile sensors (100) can receive sonar signals and transmit them. The sensors (100) can have RF peer-to-peer communications capabilities with other spherical mobile sensors (100), as well as with ships, permanent bases and orbiting satellites. Therefore the spherical mobile sensors (100) can “forward and relay” messages, signals and commands from submarines and deep sea sensors (1401) to and from the base, ships, other submarines and other spherical mobile sensors (100).
[0103] A water pump can be provided in the spherical mobile sensor (100) in order to pump water inside the inner layer (102). Once pumped with water, the spherical mobile sensor (100) gets heavier and can sink under the water surface. The outer layer (101) can be made out of a smart material, such as that described in reference [24] (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) in order to help the spherical mobile sensor (100) swim upwards or downwards faster, and can help the spherical mobile sensor (100) back to the surface again. In order to make the spherical mobile sensor (100) swim, the outer layer (101) can be of made of ETFE (or other known and appropriate polymers), which is flexible and strong. As described in reference [24], little wires, which can be referred to as shape memory alloy composites, could be laminated inside the outer layer (101). The outer layer (101) can be peeled into one or more pieces (analogous to peeling an orange or a banana) when the spherical mobile sensor (100) is deeper in the water, where one end of each piece of the peeled outer layer (101) can be connected to the internal skeleton (105) and inner skin (103). In such case, the inner layer (102) can stay filled with water in order to make the inner and outer pressure equal, so movement of the spherical mobile sensor (100) is possible and structure of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can avoid getting crushed under the pressure of the deep sea. Then the one or more pieces of the outer layer (102) can use motions as suggested in reference [24] in order to swim up to the surface. As mentioned, in reference [24], the power for the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be generated from heat-producing chemical reactions between oxygen and hydrogen with platinum coated on the surface on the outer layer (101). Therefore, the mechanism can be self sufficient in terms of energy. When the spherical mobile sensor (100) swims to the surface again, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can use the water pump in order to extract the water inside of the inner layer (102). This extraction of water will decrease the weight of the spherical mobile sensor (100) such that the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be blown by the wind on top of the surface of the water or carried by water currents. In order to keep the electronics in the spherical mobile sensor (100) safe when the spherical mobile sensor (100) goes deep in the water, the batteries and other electronics can safely be protected in the central region (705) of the spherical mobile sensor (100) by constructing the central region (705) using strong metals or polymers like steel.
[0104] As shown in the example embodiment of FIG. 14 , the spherical mobile sensors (100) can able to send active sonars (1401) to detect foreign submarines. The sensors (100) can form a wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) whose components are able to work intelligently together in order to detect and track of foreign submarines. The wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could assist in search and rescue missions as well. The spherical mobile sensors (100) can be able to send more low-power acoustic signals with a shorter wavelength, since the other spherical mobile sensors (100) of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) in the region would be able to detect them. Furthermore, the signal processing of the returned distributed acoustic signals could be done at the base station (1002) (ships, submarines or satellites missioned to the region) which can relieve the sensor (100) from the power-consuming computations. Alternatively, the sensors (100) could share the signal processing computations among themselves, so that each sensor (100) need less energy for the computations. Therefore, the cost can be significantly lower than that of the current sonar buoys with heavy batteries and signal processing done in a single buoy.
[0105] In accordance with the present disclosure, FIG. 15 shows an application of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) in detecting land mines. The wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can be used as a self-powered distributed wireless network of landmine (1501), detecting sensors that could last several months or years with the ability to dynamically reconfigure and relocate themselves using the wind-propelled motion strategy and the mechanical control design that has been described earlier in this disclosure. The wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could be deployed in an area of interest where they scan the area thoroughly, detect and locate the landmines (1501) in the area, update a collective map of the detected landmine in the area created by the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) and report the updated map back to the base stations (1003) in real time. The landmine detecting spherical mobile sensors (100) illustrated in FIG. 15 could be equipped with an array of passive and active sensors (metal detectors, explosive sniffers, nuclear reaction techniques, acoustic sensors, etc. some of them previously mentioned) to detect different kinds of landmines (1501). The sensors (100) used for detecting landmines (1501) could have a GPS to report the status (landmine or clear) and the location of the area they have scanned, to the base station (1003).
[0106] As illustrated in the example embodiment of FIG. 15 , the landmine detection application can map the areas of interest and can introduce a fast, safe, and cost-effective way of landmine detection. The distributed control architecture (1200) of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can force the sensors (100) to take advantage of their internal control mechanism (303) and the local wind to scan the area of interest thoroughly with a high resolution. Based on the standards of the United Nations for the humanitarian demining, 99.6% resolution is recommended to consider an area to be clear of landmines. Therefore, the distributed control architecture (1200) of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can control the movement of the spherical mobile sensors (100) to stop in an uncovered area, called stop-point, and scan the uncovered surrounding area with a high resolution by rolling thoroughly around the stop-point. In the present disclosure, an “uncovered area” can be defined as an area of land where no spherical mobile sensors (100) has already passed and examined to detect a possible landmine (1501).
[0107] The distributed nature of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can help to cross-reference the data and can report back more reliable data. The data collected this way could be considered more reliable since the data from multiple sensors (100) scanning the location could be averaged in real time to update the information of that area in the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000). The distributed control architecture (1200) of wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can update the map of the area in real time with the information collected about the area by each sensor (100). Moreover, the distributed control architecture (1200) can update the information regarding each sensors resources and location along with the map of their topology. This information can be broadcasted to the entire wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) in order to optimize the coverage of the area of the interest with the required resolution. For example, if a spherical mobile sensor (100) is in a location and with the current wind, it could end up in an area that was already scanned by the other sensors (100), then that spherical mobile sensor (100) might decide to stop (1203) and wait for a desired wind that could take it to some other area which wasn't scanned by other sensors (100) yet. The landmine detection application of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could allow mapping of an area of interest at a much faster pace and in a more cost-effective fashion. The sensors (100) can work continuously to ensure that the entire area of interest is fully scanned before heading to a new area. The wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can make the task of detecting the landmines, which is a risky and dangerous job, much safer. With an accurate map of the landmines (1501) created by the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000), the professionals can perform different techniques to destroy or deactivate the mines.
[0108] For scanning and mapping the landmine fields, the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be built with a very low density (for example, 1-2 kilogram in mass and at least 1 meter height) light materials to ensure that the weight of the sensors wouldn't explode the mines. Some examples of such materials and design of spherical mobile sensors (100) have been discussed in the previous sections. Lighter sensors can ensure the safe detection of landmines using wireless mesh network of sensors (1000). The information gathered this way could be used to map the safe areas in that particular region which is without any landmines. The detected landmines in the area can be deactivated or exploded safely by the experts in a later time. With an accurate map of the landmines (1501) created by the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000), the professionals can perform different techniques to destroy or deactivate the mines. The wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can be useful in flat regions and deserts of the middle-east or African countries where there is an abundance of high speed winds and strong sun light throughout the year. Using the harvested energy thorough the solar cells and/or other energy harvesting tolls attached to each sensor (100), the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could be a self-powered system that could stay active and perform various tasks for long time. Alternatively, the spherical mobile sensors (100) could be built heavier (more than 10 kg) with higher density to explode the landmines if required. For example, kevlar or similar materials that are highly temperature and tensile resistant could be used to build the spherical mobile sensor (100) to survive such explosions. The distributed control architecture (1200) of wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) and the control mechanism (303) of each spherical mobile sensor (100) in the network of sensors (1000) can ensure the coverage of the entire area of interest.
[0109] In accordance with the present disclosure, the example embodiment of FIG. 16 shows an application of the wireless mesh network of sensors in detecting and mapping various minerals and materials in an area of interest. The wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could be able to detect and map various minerals and materials in an area of interest. The spherical mobile sensors (100) in a network of sensors (1000) can use various spectrometers, imagers, GPS, and micro instruments to scan an area of interest and therefore, detect, locate, and map various minerals and compositions that might be of interest of the stakeholders of the system. Some of the instruments that could be used by the spherical mobile sensors (100) in this purpose are: gamma spectrometers, multispectral microscopic imager, alpha particle X-ray spectrometer, Raman spectrometer with a VLOK microchip laser integrated within a Raman probe-head, miniature mass spectrometer (MMS), MEMS gas chromatography sensors, different MEMs gas detectors, etc. Some example of such instruments could be found in references [14]-[18], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could be used in large deserts or flat regions with the potential of undiscovered minerals, rocks, or composite materials of interest. Most desert regions on the Earth which are approximately ⅓ of Earth's land surface [19], are windy and sunny, which could be utilized for the mobility and energy harvesting of the spherical mobile sensors (100). As mentioned previously, the distributed control architecture (1200) of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) and the internal control mechanism (303) of each spherical mobile sensor (100) can ensure an complete coverage of the area of interest with the desired resolution.
[0110] In accordance with the various embodiments of the present disclosure, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could be able to detect and map any leakage of the natural gas or oil in the gas and oil exploration and drilling sites. The wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could be used in order to find the in-situ signatures that might help to explore natural gas or oil reservoirs. Various spectrometers, sensors, micro devices, and tools could be integrated in the spherical mobile sensors (100) of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) to detect various in-situ signatures of the oil and natural gas reservoirs, or petroleum and natural gas leakage on land (for example, deserts, Antarctica), oceans, open sea and ice (for example, polar regions, tundra, Arctic, Antarctica). For example, gamma spectrometers, multispectral microscopic imager, alpha particle X-ray spectrometer, Raman spectrometer with a VLOK microchip laser integrated within a Raman probe-head, miniature mass spectrometer (MMS), MEMS gas chromatography sensors, different MEMs gas detectors, etc. Some example of such sensors could be found in references [14]-[18] and [21], incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
[0111] Another application of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could be for measuring various important factors such as air temperature and/or humidity, soil temperature and/or moisture, atmospheric pressure, solar radiation, ultraviolet radiation, wind vane, luminosity, anemometer, pluviometer for autonomously monitoring the large agricultural lands for agricultural purposes. Some example of such sensors could be found in reference [21], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) and its distributed control architecture (1200) could be able to perform the above mentioned tasks for monitoring the agricultural lands in the same manner discussed in the context of FIGS. 10, 11, 12, 15, and 16 . Moreover, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could also be used to disseminate or spread various materials, or chemicals on the flat agricultural lands (for example, fertilizers, pesticide, seeds etc.). This might be done by placing the chemicals or materials in the one or more tubular rings (302) and disseminator canisters (206) of each sensor (100) from the network of sensors (100), where the controllable valve attached to the canisters might help to spread their contents in the desired area.
[0112] According to the example embodiments of the present disclosure, the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) could be used for autonomous monitoring of vast and/or remote lands (for example, the deserts or the polar regions) to detect and measure earthquake. By integrating gyroscope and accelerometer, for example, MEMS inertial measurement unit (3-axis gyro/accelerometer/magnetic) in the sensors (100), the vibrations and movements of the sensors (100) could be detected. Therefore, if any particular pattern in the signals is detected which could represent an earthquake in the area, the strength of the earthquake could be recognized. An example of such process using iphones could be found in reference [22], incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0113] FIGS. 17-18 shows an application of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) in monitoring land, ice and maritime of the Arctic. Recent observations of the Arctic have shown that the sea ice is melting at an alarming rate. In the past decade, the Arctic sea ice cover has been shifted from a regime dominated by thick and stable (multi-year) perennial ice to one dominated by thin and weak (first-year) seasonal ice. Current sensing and measurement capabilities lack the time-responsiveness, accuracy, and spatial coverage required to effectively quantify each contributing factor to the above phenomena and to identify other missing factors. These capabilities are critical to improve seasonal-to-decadal prediction models across local, regional, and global scales for science research as well as stakeholders' applications. Lacking reliable ice topography, water, and weather condition maps especially pose great risks on the marine transportation vessels passing through the Arctic when the ice is partially melting and the safest and the shortest path and time to travel is vital for safe navigation.
[0114] The Arctic monitoring application of the wireless mesh network sensors (1000), as shown in FIGS. 17-18 , can be equipped with an array of low-power and low-mass sensors, and micro devices able to measure a wide range of environmental factors such as the ice conditions (ice class, ice thickness, ice temperature, snow depth, etc.), chemical species (carbon dioxide, bromine monoxide, ozone, gaseous elementary mercury, etc.), wind vector patterns, cloud coverage, air temperature and pressure, electromagnetic fields, surface and subsurface water conditions, short- and long-wave radiations, bathymetry, and other secondary factors such as human presence and activity. The wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can have the power to observe those constantly changing conditions in real-time, providing the basic capability required to update the ice topography and the weather patterns, which are the root of the existing predictive climate models. The distributed nature of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can instantly map those environmental parameters over an entire region (1201) to reliably assess their value by cross-referencing readings from multiple nearby spherical mobile sensors (100), and to continuously update those maps. The widely and uniformly spread number of spherical mobile sensors (100), their peer-to-peer communications (1001) and their communication capabilities with the ground-based and sea-based stations (1002), and orbiting satellites would comprise a wireless mesh network (1001) that provides an interface for a global distributed control architecture that will ensure an Arctic-wide coverage, optimizing mobile sensor (100) monitoring efforts according to their available resources and the priority (1202) of local areas (1201) of high interest within the Arctic region. The system (1000) provides near real time ice topography and weather condition maps of the entire Arctic. Considering the melting ice and increasing maritime transportation in the region, and the fact that the Arctic is becoming the shortest and most economical way of transiting goods from the Atlantic to the Pacific this is of great importance. In this application, the system (1000) could also be used as an Arctic-wide wireless infrastructure for passing maritime vessels to transfer data and communicate with base-stations (1003). The system (1000) could also be used for search and rescue missions.
[0115] Another application of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can be in the discovery of oil and gas discovery and oil spillage direction and clean-up in the Arctic. A geological survey performed in United States in 2008 estimates that the areas north of the Arctic circle can have 90 billion barrels of undiscovered, technically recoverable oil (and 44 billion barrels of natural gas liquids) in 25 geologically defined areas. This represents 13% of the undiscovered oil in the world. However, the extremely harsh arctic environment can hamper the exploration missions, spillage discoveries, estimations, and recoveries and can make it very difficult, risky, and costly. Furthermore, due to the lack of a reliable weather, ice, and sea condition forecast, monitoring and alerting system in the area, the safety of drilling operations, oil transportations, and marine transits is at risk. In addition, when drilling into the ice, it is important to monitor the ice condition around and in the wider surroundings of the site to make sure that it would not cause any major ice breakage and oil leakage. Such unanticipated ice flows and ice cracks heading towards the exploration and drilling sites are a major threat for the safe operation and safety of the personnel. The land, ice and maritime monitoring system of the Arctic, which can use of the wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) addresses all the above concerns.
[0116] As mentioned above, the spherical mobile sensors (100) could be equipped with an array of low-power low-mass sensors and micro devices able to measure a wide range of environmental factors such as the ice conditions (ice class, ice thickness, ice temperature, snow depth, etc.), water condition, cloud coverage, air temperature and pressure, wind vector patterns which are all of great interest to any oil and gas activity. In addition, the spherical mobile sensor (100) (especially in the North Slope) could carry a variety of sensors and spectrometers to autonomously scan, detect and map the oil and gas reservoir signatures (e.g. hydrocarbon-bearing materials, pure oil and oil-impacted soils and natural gas) in a wide area and report the constantly updated map with the most promising sites for successful oil and gas drilling back to the base stations (1003). The wireless mesh network of sensors (1000) can be able to monitor and map any leakage and spillage such as base fluids (e.g. diesel, mineral oil, synthetic fluid, etc.), petroleum oil-based muds (OBM's) (crude oil & natural gas condensate), seepage (including observations less than one barrel), spill events (with total spillage of 50 barrels or more), passive spills (unseen spills based on inventories of products lost from destroyed structures which are thoroughly dispersed during the storms) in the area.
[0117] The structure of the spherical mobile sensor (100) can be customized to carry and spread bioremediation in the case of possible oil spillage on the shoreline which uses naturally-occurring bacteria to “eat” oil. In the case of spillage, they can also spread chemical dispersants in the area to break down oil in water into small droplets. They spherical mobile sensors (100) thereby enhance and accelerate natural dispersion which makes the oil more available for natural biodegradation. In a different embodiment, an alternative strategy could be to make the entire mobile sensor (100) structure out of inert materials such as sorbents which are able to remove oil either by adsorption (the oil adheres to the surface of the material) or by absorption (the oil penetrates the pores of the material and is trapped inside). In either form, water passes through or is repelled by the material.
[0118] All patents and publications mentioned in the specification may be indicative of the levels of skill of those skilled in the art to which the disclosure pertains. All references cited in this disclosure are incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference had been incorporated by reference in its entirety individually.
[0119] The examples set forth above are provided to give those of ordinary skill in the art a complete disclosure and description of how to make and use the embodiments of the autonomous and controllable systems of sensors and methods of using such systems of the disclosure, and are not intended to limit the scope of what the inventors regard as their disclosure. Modifications of the above-described modes for carrying out the disclosure may be used by persons of skill in the art, and are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.
[0120] It is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to particular methods or systems, which can, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosure pertains.
[0121] A number of embodiments of the disclosure have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
References
- [0122] [1] B. Joyce, “Development of an Electromagnetic Energy Harvester for Monitoring Wind Turbine Blades.” MS Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Dec. 12, 2011. World wide website scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12202011-195538/unrestricted/Joyce_BS_T_2011.pdf. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0123] [2] World wide website techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20130206/264517/. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0124] [3] K. Najafi, T. Galchev, E. E. Aktakka, R. L. Peterson, J. McCullagh, “Microsystems for Energy Harvesting,” Invited Paper, 16th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators, and Microsystems (IEEE Transducers), Beijing China, pp. 1845-1850, June 2011
- [0125] [4] World wide website libelium.com/documentation/waspmote/waspmote-datasheet_eng.pdf. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0126] [5] World wide website machinedesign.com/article/metal-faced-inductive-sensors-for-durability-1106. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0127] [6] World wide website gs.flir.com/products/icx-detection/explosives/fido-onboard/. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0128] [7] World wide website Synkera.com. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0129] [8] World wide website vectomay.com. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0130] [9] World wide website microdevices.jpl.nasa.gov/capabilities/superconducting-devices/tes-bolometers.php. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0131] [10] World wide website pdfdownload.org/pdf2html/view_online.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcensam.mit.edu%2Fnews%2 Fposters%2F2010%2Fnorford%2F4.pdf. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0132] [11] World wide website cs.gsu.edu/yli/teaching/Fall10/sensor/Slides/rp.pdf. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0133] [12] World wide website cs.gsu.edu/yli/teaching/Fall10/sensor/Slides/rp.pdf. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0134] [13] World wide website ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11030581. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0135] [14] World wide website ortec-online.com/Solutions/gamma-spectroscopy.aspx. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0136] [15] J. I. Nuñez, J. D. Farmer, R. G. Sellar, and P. B. Gardner, “The Multispectral Microscopic Imager (MMI) with Improved Spectral Range and Resolution” 40th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2009.
- [0137] [16] World wide website msl-scicorner.jpl.nasa.gov/Instruments/APXS/. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0138] [17] World wide website instrumentsystems.jpl.nasa.gov/docs/MDL_AR09_041310.pdf. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0139] [18] M. P. Sinha, E. L. Neidholdt, J. Hurowitz, W. Sturhahn, B. Beard, M. H. Hecht “Laser ablation-miniature mass spectrometer for elemental and isotopic analysis of rocks.” Rev Sci Instrum. September. 2011. 82(9).
- [0140] [19] World wide website geology.com/records/largest-desert.shtml. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0141] [20] P. Harrington, A. Silliman, “Relationship between Reservoir Quality and Hydrocarbon Signatures Measured at the Surface” Search and Discovery Article #41078 (2012). Posted Nov. 26, 2012.
- [0142] [21] World wide website cs.gsu.edu/yli/teaching/Fall10/sensor/Slides/rp.pdf. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0143] [22] World wide website libelium.com/products/waspmote/sensors. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0144] [23] World wide website ishakeberkeley.appspot.com/. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
- [0145] [24] World wide website iopscience.iop.org/0964-1726/21/4/045013. URL verified on Feb. 25, 2013.
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. A sensor comprising:
an inner enclosure;
an outer enclosure enclosing the inner enclosure;
at least one sensing device for measuring a physical quantity, or a controlling device for controlling the sensor; and
a first layer between an outer surface of the inner enclosure and an inner surface of the outer enclosure,
wherein the sensor comprises at least one energy harvesting tool and at least one internal source of power; and
the at least one energy harvesting tool is configured to harvest mechanical or thermal energy or sunlight from ambient resources and store the harvested energy in the at least one internal source of power.
2. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the energy harvesting tool is a triboelectric or thermopile material, or a self-charging power cell.
3. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the outer enclosure further comprises a circularly shaped enhanced orbit region configured to be more resistant to mechanical wear than a remaining region of the outer enclosure, and wherein the controlling device is configured to move the sensor in such a way that the circularly shaped enhanced orbit region is in contact with the ground.
4. The sensor of claim 3, wherein the circularly shaped enhanced orbit region comprises a high tensile resistance material.
5. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the first layer is elastic.
6. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the outer enclosure further comprises a gyroscopic imager in a gel or liquid, thereby allowing free relative motion of the imager with respect to the sensor.
7. The sensor of claim 6, wherein the gel or liquid is ethanol.
8. The sensor of claim 6, wherein the imager comprises a protective outer layer made of sapphire or transparent elastomers.
9. A sensor system comprising a plurality of sensors according to claim 1, wherein each sensor is configured to communicate with other sensors within the sensor system, and the plurality of sensors in the sensor system forms a network of sensors.
10. The sensor system of claim 9, wherein the network of sensors is configured to share tasks and responsibilities between the sensors, according to available resources of the sensors.
11. The sensor system of claim 10, wherein the tasks and responsibilities comprise sensing the environment, tracking targets, or communicating with a base station.
12. The sensor system of claim 11, wherein the network of sensors is further configured to dynamically change the supervising peer if the supervising peer exits the supervising sub-region, thereby selecting a previously presented supervising peer among the sensors in the sub-region.
13. The sensor system of claim 10, wherein the available resources comprise power, memory, bandwidth, structure's endurance, or chemicals that need to be spread out.
14. The sensor system of claim 9, wherein the network of sensors is configured to virtually divide an area of interest in a grid comprising a plurality of sub-regions, and select a sensor as a supervising peer for coordinating an activity of sensors in a sub-region.
15. The sensor system of claim 9, wherein the network of sensors is configured to virtually divide an area of interest in a grid comprising a plurality of sub-regions, each sub-region having: a ranking weight value that represents a level of importance of the sub-region relative to a specified task of the network of sensors, a total number of sensors in the sub-region, a total power available in the at least one internal source of power of each sensor in the sub-region, a total power available to be harvested by the at least one energy harvesting tool of each sensor in the sub-region, a rate of energy generation by the at least one energy harvesting tool of each sensor in the sub-region, available memory of each sensor in the sub-region, available assigned bandwidth to each sensor in the sub-region, and number of sensors which are currently outside the sub-region but could be commanded to enter the sub-region from nearby sub-regions.
16. The sensor system of claim 15, wherein the network of sensors is further configured to assign a ranking of priority to a specific sub-region, based on a priority of a strategy value specific sub-region.
17. The sensor system of claim 16, wherein the network of sensors is further configured to assign a number of sensors to a specific sub-region, based on a total number of sensors in the grid, a total power available in the at least one internal source of power of each sensor in the grid, a total power available to be harvested by the at least one energy harvesting tool of each sensor in the grid, a rate of energy generation by the at least one energy harvesting tool of each sensor in the grid, available memory of each sensor in the grid, available assigned bandwidth to each sensor in the grid, and current distribution of sensors among different sub-regions of different ranking.
18. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the outer enclosure comprises at least one rigidizable tightening ring encircling the inner enclosure, the at least one rigidizable tightening ring having a controllable rigidity.
19. The sensor of claim 18, wherein the at least one rigidizable tightening ring is made of aluminum, titanium or carbon fiber.
20. The sensor of claim 18, wherein the at least one rigidizable tightening ring is laminated on the outer surface of the inner enclosure.
21. The sensor of claim 18, wherein the at least one rigidizable tightening ring is configured to be an antenna.
22. The sensor of claim 18, further comprising:
at least one tubular ring; and
at least one disseminator canister attached to the at least one tubular ring, the at least one disseminator canister being located in the outer enclosure.
23. The sensor of claim 22, wherein the at least one tubular ring is made of ethylene tetrafluoroethylene.
24. The sensor of claim 22, wherein at least one disseminator canister contains chemical dispersants or bioremediation bacteria.
25. The sensor of claim 18, further comprising at least one disseminator canister located in the outer enclosure.
26. The sensor of claim 1, further comprising electronic circuits and sensors printed on the outer surface of the inner enclosure.
27. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the inner enclosure comprises:
at least one diffuser capsule containing an inflating and/or strengthening agent; and
a control mechanism configured to activate the at least one diffuser capsule, thereby inflating the sensor.
28. The sensor of claim 27, wherein the inflating agent is nitrogen.
29. The sensor of claim 1, further comprising:
three mutually orthogonal tubes, connected at a center located at a central position for each of the three mutually orthogonal tubes;
at least six movable weights, slidable along the three mutually orthogonal tubes, the at least six movable weights being of equal weight, equally distributed in number among the three mutually orthogonal tubes, and equally divided, for each tube, among each opposite side of each tube with respect to the center;
a blocking structure at the center, configured to prevent the at least six movable weights to slide through the center; and
a controller, located inside the blocking structure, configured to control a position for each of the at least six movable weights,
wherein the at least six movable weights can be moved in different positions within the three mutually orthogonal tubes to change a center of mass of the sensor.
30. The sensor of claim 29, wherein the three mutually orthogonal tubes are made of a polymeric material.
31. The sensor of claim 29, further comprising a gyroscope and/or accelerometer inside the blocking structure.
32. The sensor of claim 29, wherein the blocking structure is made of a material chosen from the group consisting of: aluminum, titanium, kevlar, ethylene tetra fluoro ethylene, kapton, or carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer with a coating of polyurea.
33. The sensor of claim 29, wherein the at least six movable weights are magnetic.
34. The sensor of claim 33, further comprising solenoids wound on the three mutually orthogonal tubes.
35. The sensor of claim 34, wherein the sensor is configured to generate electricity by movement of the at least six movable magnetic weights within the solenoids.
36. The sensor of claim 29, wherein the at least six movable weights are solenoids and the three mutually orthogonal tubes are magnetic.
37. The sensor of claim 29, wherein the at least six movable weights are piezoelectric.
38. The sensor of claim 1, further comprising:
two ball bearings attached at opposite points of the inner surface of the outer enclosure;
an axle rotatably attached to the two ball bearings; and
a central region fixedly attached to the axle,
wherein, during a motion of the sensor, the central region is configured to substantially remain level with ground level by rotating on the two ball bearings.
39. The sensor of claim 38, further comprising a controller, configured to adjust a stiffness of a grip around the two ball bearings, thereby controlling a movement of the sensor.
40. The sensor of claim 1, further comprising:
a first and second ball bearings attached at opposite points of the inner surface of the outer enclosure;
a first axle rotatably attached to the first ball bearing;
a second axle rotatably attached to the second ball bearing, and substantially coaxial with the first axle;
a third ball bearing rotatably attached to the first axle, at an opposite end with respect to the first ball bearing;
a fourth ball bearing rotatably attached to the second axle, at an opposite end with respect to the second ball bearing; and
a central region rotatably attached to the third and fourth ball bearings,
wherein, during a motion of the sensor, the central region is configured to substantially remain level with ground level by rotating on the first, second, third and/or fourth ball bearing.
41. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the outer enclosure comprises a sorbent outer surface configured to sorb chemical pollutants from an environment.
42. The sensor of claim 41, wherein the sorbent outer surface is made of polyurethane foam.
43. The sensor of claim 1, further comprising:
at least one tube;
at least two movable weights, slidable along the at least one tube, the at least two movable weights being of equal weight and equally divided among each opposite side with respect to the center of the at least one tube;
a blocking structure at the center, configured to prevent the at least two movable weights to slide through the center; and
a controller, located inside the blocking structure, configured to control a position for each of the at least two movable weights,
wherein the at least two movable weights can be moved in different positions to change a center of mass of the sensor.
44. The sensor of claim 43, wherein the at least one tube is made of a polymeric material.
45. The sensor of claim 43, wherein the at least two movable weights are magnetic.
46. The sensor of claim 43, further comprising solenoids wound on the at least one tube.
47. The sensor of claim 46, wherein the sensor is configured to generate electricity by movement of the at least two movable magnetic weights within the solenoids.
48. The sensor of claim 43, wherein the at least two movable weights are solenoids and the at least one tube is magnetic.
49. The sensor of claim 43, wherein the at least two movable weights are piezoelectric.
50. The sensor of claim 1, further comprising:
at least one tube;
at least one movable weight, slidable along the at least one tube thereby acting as a pendulum;
a controller, configured to control a position for the at least one movable weight,
wherein the at least one movable weight can be moved in different positions to change a center of mass of the sensor.
Patent Citations (21)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US819609(A) | 1906-05-01 | Shorthouse | Applicant |
| US1263262(A) | 1918-04-01 | McFaul | Applicant |
| US2949696(A) | 1960-08-01 | Easterling | Applicant |
| US3798835(A) | 1974-03-01 | McKeehan | Applicant |
| US4541814(A) | 1985-09-01 | Martin | Applicant |
| US5593332(A) | 1997-01-01 | Green | Applicant |
| US6679118(B1) | 2004-01-01 | Esashi et al. | Applicant |
| US7371136(B2) | 2008-05-01 | Hine et al. | Applicant |
| US7641524(B2) | 2010-01-01 | Hine et al. | Applicant |
| US8043133(B2) | 2011-10-01 | Hine et al. | Applicant |
| US8054198(B2) | 2011-11-01 | Spinelli et al. | Applicant |
| US8287323(B2) | 2012-10-01 | Hine et al. | Applicant |
| US8316970(B1) | 2012-11-01 | Tran | Applicant |
| US2003/0055359(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Halleck et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0066809(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Cormack | Examiner |
| US2010/0212574(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Hawkes et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0011323(A1) | 2011-01-01 | Wiggins et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0244815(A1) | 2012-09-01 | Altan | Examiner |
| US2012/0285544(A1) | 2012-11-01 | Westby et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0289103(A1) | 2012-11-01 | Hudson et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0222115(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Davoodi et al. | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (134)
- W. Carroll, “Submarine Numbers at Issue”, Jun. 30, 2009, 2 pages, http://defensetech.org/2009/06/30/submarine-numbers-at-issue/ (defensetech.org/2009/06/30/submarine-numbers-at-issue/#ixzz2zs3TdeBB).Applicant
- CBS News, “25 countries now helping search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370”, Mar. 16, 2014, 6 pages. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/malaysia-airlines-flight-370-25-countries-helping-search-for-missing-plane/.Applicant
- “Ocean”, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, downloaded from the internet Aug. 7, 2015. 2 pages. http://www.noaa.gov/ocean.html.Applicant
- “Ocean in Motion: Ekman Transport-Background”, Ocean Motion and surface currents, downloaded from the internet Aug. 7, 2015. 2 pages. http://oceanmotion.org/html/background/ocean-in-motion.htm.Applicant
- A. Clites “Observation of Concurrent Drifting Buoy and Current Meter Measurements in Lake Michigan”, Journal of Great Lakes Research 15(2) 1989: pp. 197-204.Applicant
- Dupont “DuPont Tefzel ETFE Fluoroplastic Film” Downloaded from the internet Aug. 7, 2015. https://www.chemours.com/Teflon—Industrial/en—US/assets/downloads/Chemours—Tefzel—ETFE—Film—Properties—Bulletin—K26943.pdf 3 pages.Applicant
- K-Mac Plastics “Tefzel ETFE Properties” Downloaded from the internet Aug. 7, 2015. 2 pages. http://kmac-plastics.net/data/technical/etfe.htm.Applicant
- M. Stojanovic, “Retrofocusing Techniques for High Rate Acoustic Communications”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 117 (3), Pt. 1, Mar. 2005, pp. 1173-1185.Applicant
- M. Stojanovic et al., “Multichannel Detection for Wideband Underwater Acoustic CDMA Communications”, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 31, No. 3, Jul. 2006, pp. 685-695.Applicant
- M. Stojanovic et al. “Phase-Coherent Digital Communications for Underwater Acoustic Channels”, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 19, No. 1, Jan. 1994, pp. 100-111.Applicant
- M. Stojanovic et al., “Adaptive Multichannel Combining and Equalization for Underwater Acoustic Communications” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 94˜(3), Pt. 1, Sep. 1993, pp. 1621-1631.Applicant
- P. Abad-Manterola et al. “Wheel Design and Tension Analysis for the Tethered Axel Rover on Extreme Terrain”, IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, vol. 2009. pp. 1-8.Applicant
- P. Abad-Manterola, et al. “Axel: A Minimalist Tethered Rover for Exploration of Extreme Planetary Terrains”. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, vol. 16 (4). 2009 pp. 44-52.Applicant
- M. Tanner et al. (2013) “Online Motion Planning for Tethered Robots in Extreme Terrain”. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)., Piscataway, NJ, pp. 5557-5564.Applicant
- F. Davoodi et al. (2014) “A Self-Powered Intelligent Network of Controllable Spherical Sensors to Explore Solar Planets and Moons”, AIAA SPACE 2014 Conference & Exposition.Applicant
- F. Davoodi et al. (2015) “Moball-Buoy Network: A Near-Real-Time Ground-Truth Distributed Monitoring System to Map Ice, Weather, Chemical Species, and Radiations, in the Arctic”, 11th Annual Polar Technology Conference, Mar. 2015, Denver, CO.Applicant
- F. Davoodi et al. (2014) “Re-Entry Hopper-Aero-Space-Craft System on Mars (REARM-Mars)”, AIAA SPACE 2014 Conference & Exposition.Applicant
- J.O. Dabiri (2005) “On the Estimation of Swimming and Flying Forces from Wake Measurements”, Journal of Experimental Biology vol. 208., pp. 3519-3532.Applicant
- J.O. Dabiri et al. (2005) “Vortex Motion in the Ocean: In Situ Visualization of Jellyfish Swimming and Feeding Flows”, Physics of Fluids 17, 091108.Applicant
- J.O. Dabiri et al.(2005) “The Role of Optimal Vortex Formation in Biological Fluid Transport”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272: 1557-1560.Applicant
- J.O. Dabiri et al. (2005) “Starting Flow Through Nozzles with Temporally Variable Exit Diameter”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics vol. 538, pp. 111-136.Applicant
- J.O. Dabiri et al. (2005) “Flow Patterns Generated by Oblate Medusan jellyfish: Field Measurements and Laboratory Analyses”, The Journal of Experimental Biology vol. 208., pp. 1257-1265.Applicant
- F. Davoodi et al. (2015) “A Phase-Changing Pendulum to Control Spherical Robots and Buoy Sensors”, Tech Brief Journal, Feb. 1, 2015.Applicant
- L. Freitag et al. “The WHOI Micro-Modem: An Acoustic Communications and Navigation System for Multiple Platforms” IEEE OCEANS Sep. 19, 2005.Applicant
- S. Mackay “Robotic Jellyfish Could One Day Patrol Oceans, Clean Oil Spills, and Detect Pollutants”, VirginiaTech, May 29, 2012, 4 pages.Applicant
- F. Davoodi et al. (2012) “Gone with the wind on Mars (GOWON): A wind-driven networked system of mobile sensors on Mars”, Lunary and Planetary Institute Workshop on Mars Exploration Concepts and Approaches, Jun. 2012, http://www.1pi.usra.edu/meetings/marsconcepts2012/pdf/4238.pdf.Applicant
- F. Davoodi et al., (2012) “A Design for the Structure and the Mechanic of Moballs”, JPL & NASA Case No. NPO 48643. NASA Tech Briefs, Oct. 2012; 17-18.Applicant
- R. Johnson, (2012) “Russia and Canada Move Troops to the North Pole to Assert Territorial Interests”, Business Insider, last consulted on Jul. 4, 2012 at: http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-07-07/news/30089753—1—fighter-jets-continental-shelf-barrels.Applicant
- CBC news Canada, (2010) “Battle for the Arctic heats up”, last consulted on Jul. 4, 2012 at http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2009/02/27/f-arctic-sovereignty.html.Applicant
- Spiegel Online, (2007) “The Race for the Arctic”, last consulted on Jul. 4, 2012 at http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/cold-wars-in-the-arctic-canada-takes-on-russiain-race-for-north-pole-a-499287.html.Applicant
- C. Boyd, (2012) “Mine Kafon: Wind-blown landmine clearance”, last consulted on Jul. 4, 2012 at http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120503-blowing-in-the-wind.Applicant
- P. Wadhams, (2012) “Arctic Ice Cover, Ice Thickness and Tipping Points”, AMBIO—journal of the human environment, vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 23-33.Applicant
- M.Bettwy, NASA, (2012) “Changes in the Arctic: Consequences for the World”, last consulted on Jul. 4, 2012 at http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/earthandsun/arctic—changes.html.Applicant
- NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data, (2007), last consulted on Jul. 4, 2012 at http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/DataMenus.pl?dataset=NCEP.Applicant
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environment Sciences, (2011), last consulted on Jul. 4, 2012 at http://cires.colorado.edu/science/pro/parca/.Applicant
- NASA. “Cryospheric Science at NASA” downloaded from http://ice.nasa.gov/ on Aug. 12, 2015.Applicant
- National Defense and the Canadian Forces, (2012) “The Distant Early Warning (DEW) Line Clean-up Project”, last consulted on Jul. 4, 2012 at http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/news/article.page?doc=the-distant-early-warning-line-clean-up-project/hnmx19pm.Applicant
- J. Baglole, “North Warning System—Protecting North America's Backdoor”, last consulted on Jul. 4, 2012 at http://usmilitary.about.com/od/weapons/a/northwarning.htm.Applicant
- North American Aerospace Defense Command, (2012) “NORAD Agreement”, last consulted on Jul. 4, 2012 at http://www.norad.mil/AboutNORAD/NORADAgreement/tabid/3428/mid/7417/dnnprintmode/true/Default.aspx?SkinSrc=%5bG%5dSkins%2f—default%2fNo+Skin&ContainerSrc=%5bG%5dContainers%2f—default%2fNo+Container.Applicant
- P. F. Gorder, (2003) “Sizing Up Smart Dust”, Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 6-9.Applicant
- I. Chatzigiannakis et al. (2003) “A Sleep-Awake Protocol for Information Propagation in Smart Dust Networks”, Proceedings of the International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2003), pp. 1-8.Applicant
- J.A. Jones, (2001) “Inflatable Robotics for Planetary Applications”, 6th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, I-SAIRAS. Montreal, Canada.Applicant
- A. Behar, NASA-JPL, (2004), “Tumbleweed Polar Rover”, IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, Mar. 6-13, 2004. last consulted on Jul. 4, 2012 at http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/39171/1/04-0014.pdf.Applicant
- R. Amirtharajah, et al., (2006), “Circuits for Energy Harvesting Sensor Signal Processing”, 43rd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, pp. 639-644.Applicant
- Niklaus et al. “MEMS-Based Uncooled Infrared Bolometer Arrays—A Review” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 6836 68360D-2.Applicant
- K. Najafi et al. (2012), “Energy Scavenging From Low Frequency Vibrations”, NIST-funded project at the Engineering Research Center for Wireless Integrated MicroSystems, http://www.eecs.umich.edu/najafi/files/energyscavenging.pdf.Applicant
- K. Najafi et al. (2012), “A Micro Thermoelectric Generator for Microsystems”, DARPA-funded project at the Engineering Research Center for Wireless Integrated MicroSystems, http://www.eecs.umich.edu/najafi/files/microthermgen.pdf.Applicant
- R.O. Warrington, et al. (2012), “MEMS-Based Energy Harvesting for Low-Frequency Vibrations”, WIMS ERC-funded project at the Engineering Research Center for Wireless Integrated MicroSystems, http://www.eecs.umich.edu/najafi/files/MEMSbased.pdf.Applicant
- D.Bouchouicha et al. (2010) “Ambient RF Energy Harvesting”, International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ 2010), Granada, Spain, pp. 1-5.Applicant
- K. Najafi et al. (2012), “Integrated Low-Power, High-Pressure, High-Flow Gas Micropump”, WIMS ERC-funded project at the Engineering Research Center for Wireless Integrated MicroSystems, http://www.eecs.umich.edu/najafi/files/integratedlowpower.pdf.Applicant
- W. Khun, et al. (2007) “Microtransceiver for UHF Proximity Links Including Mars Surface-to-Orbit Applications”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, No. 10, pp. 2019-2044.Applicant
- B. Acikmese et al. (2012) “A Markov Chain Approach to Probabilistic Swarm Guidance,” 2012 American Control Conference (ACC), Montréal, Canada. Jun. 27-29, 2012.Applicant
- Rutgersprep.org (2008) “Aquabots: Robots of the Deep” downloaded from http://www.rutgersprep.org/kendall/7thgrade/cycleA—2008—09/zi/robo-AQUA4.html.Applicant
- Sinha, M.P. et al. “Laser ablation-miniature mass spectrometer for elemental and isotopic analysis of rocks” Review of Scientific Instruments. Sep. 2011. 82(9).Applicant
- “The World's Largest Deserts”. www.geology.com/records/largest-desert.shtml. Retrieved Jul. 2, 2013.Applicant
- Harrington, P. et al, “Relationship between Reservoir Quality and Hydrocarbon Signatures Measured at the Surface” Search and Discovery Article #41078 (2012). Posted Nov. 26, 2012.Applicant
- “Sensor Boards” www.libelium.com/products/waspmote/sensors. Retrieved Jul. 2, 2013.Applicant
- Holstein- et al. Winds at the Phoenix landing site. J. Geophys. Res. 115, E00E18, doi:10.1029/2009JE003411, 2010.Applicant
- Almeida et al. “Giant saltation on Mars”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 6222-6226, 2008.Applicant
- Bertelsen et al. “Magnetic Properties Experiments on the Mars Exploration Rover Spirit at Gusev Crater”. Science 305, 827 (2004).Applicant
- http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20110901a.html.Applicant
- Mandrake et al. “Automated Neutral Region selection using superpixels”. Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS). Jun. 14-16, 2010.Applicant
- Delin et al. “The Sensor Web: A New Instrument Concept.” SPIE Symposium on Integrated Optics. Jan. 20-26, 2001. San Jose, CA.Applicant
- Dubowsky et al. “A Concept Mission: Microbots for Large-Scale Planetary Surface and Subsurface Exploration” STAIF 2005 pp. 1449-1458.Applicant
- Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/776,652 filed in the name of Davoodi et al. Feb. 25, 2013.Applicant
- Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 26, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/776,652 filed in the name of Davoodi et al. Feb. 25, 2013.Applicant
- Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 14, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/776,652 filed in the name of Davoodi et al. Feb. 25, 2013.Applicant
- Oceanoptics “USB2000+ (Custom)” downloaded from the internet on Aug. 13, 2015.Applicant
- Satphonestore “Iridium Core 9523 Modem” downloaded from the internet on Aug. 13, 2015.Applicant
- Ocean Portal Team “Gulf Oil Spill” downloaded from the internet on Aug. 13, 2015.Applicant
- Lodolce et al. “Ice Surface Penetration Experiment for Arctic Research (Ice SPEAR) Final Report” Sep. 9, 2013.Applicant
- Office of Naval Research et al. “Naval Operations in an Ice-Free- Arctic” Naval Operations in an Ice-Free Arctic Symposium, Apr. 17-18, 2001.Applicant
- Parkinson et al. “Arctic sea ice variability and trends, 1976-2006”, J. Geophys. Res. 113(C7), 2008.Applicant
- Simpson et al. “Halogens and their role in polar boundary-layer ozone depletion” Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, pp. 4375-4418, 2007.Applicant
- Overland, J.E. “Meteorology of the Beaufort Sea”, J. Geophys. Res. 114, CO0A07, 2009.Applicant
- Xiao L. et al. Simultaneous routing and resource allocation via dual decomposition: Communications, IEEE Transactions on 52.7 (2004): 1136-1144.Applicant
- Houtan et al. “A Case Study of Participatory Data Transfer for Urban Temperature Monitoring”Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems, Kyoto, Japan, Mar. 2011.Applicant
- Houtan et al. “Using Location Based Social Networks for Quality-Aware Participatory Data Transfer” ACT SIGSPATIAL, LBSN, San Jose, California, Nov. 2010.Applicant
- International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/033845 filed Jun. 2, 2014 on behalf of California Institute of Technology. Mailed Aug. 31, 2015.Applicant
- Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/033845 filed Jun. 2, 2014 on behalf of California Institute of Technology. Mailed Aug. 31, 2015.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/033846 filed Jun. 2, 2015 on behalf of California Institute of Technology. Mailed Sep. 23, 2015.Applicant
- Kenyon, K. E. (1969), Stokes drift for random gravity waves, J. Geophys. Res., 74(28), 6991-6994, doi:10.1029/JC074i028p06991.Applicant
- Burkhardt, M. et al. “Energy Harvesting for Moball, A Self-Propelled Mobile Sensor Platform Capable of Long Duration Operation in Harsh Terrains” IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, May-Jun. 2014, Hong Kong. p. 2665-2672.Applicant
- Ramezani, H. et al. “Underwater Acoustic Localization Based on Collision Tolerant Packet Scheduling”, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., May 2014. vol. 14; No. 5. 2584-2595.Applicant
- L. Freitag et al. “Basin-Scale Acoustic Communication: A Feasibility Study Using Tomography M-Sequences”, Proc. IEEE Oceans 2001 Conference, Honolulu, HI, Nov. 2001. 2256-2261.Applicant
- Nesnas, I.A.D., et al. 2012, “Axel and DuAxel Rovers for the Sustainable Exploration of Extreme Terrains”. J. Field Robotics, vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 663-685.Applicant
- F. Davoodi “Exploiting Ekman Spiral Phenomena for Locomotion and Controlling the Trajectory and the Speed of the Buoys, AUVs, or Robo Jellies on the Surface and Near the Surface of the Open Seas” Caltech Patent Office CIT File No. CIT-6531-P-2 Filed: Apr. 24, 2014. 52 pages.Applicant
- J. Asama, et al. “Design investigation of a coreless tubular linear generator for a Moball: A spherical exploration robot with wind-energy harvesting capability” 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) May 26030 2015, pp. 244-251.Applicant
- Tadessa, Y. et al. “Hydrogen-fuel-powered bell segments of biomimetic jellyfish” Smart Mater. Struct. 21045013. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/21/4/045013. Published Mar. 20, 2012. 17 pages.Applicant
- W. Trogler, M. Sailor Nanostructure Porous Silicon and Luminescent Polysiloles as Chemical Sensors for Carcinogenic Chromiom(VI) and Arsenic(V) http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncer—abstracts/index.cfm/fuseaction/display.abstractDetail/abstract/2368/report/ 5 pages.Applicant
- Sadeghi M. et al. “Hair-based sensors for micro-autonomous systems” Proc. of SPIE 2012 vol. 8373 p. 83731L-1-83731L-8.Applicant
- MEMS pressure sensor: LPS331AP. Mar. 2012. (www.st.com/web/catalog/sense—power/FM89/SC1316/PF25160) 36 pages.Applicant
- Ocean Optics Inc. “USB2000 Miniature Fiber Optic Spectrometer”. (www.oceanoptics.com/Products/usb2000.asp) 2010. 30 pages.Applicant
- BTech Acoustics, LLC. “Model BT-1RCL” 2010. 1 page.Applicant
- Free Spirit Energy. “Windwalker 250 and Mounting Options” 2015. 1 page.Applicant
- QinetiQ North America “Underwater Optical Communications” downloaded from the internet Oct. 29, 2015. 1 page.Applicant
- Buckle, J.R. et al. “Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Thermoelectric Power Generation” Journal of Electronic Materials vol. 42, (7), p. 2214-2220, Jul. 2013.Applicant
- Villanueva, A. et al. “A biomimetic robotic jellyfish (Robojelly) actuated by shape memory alloy composite actuators” Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 6 (2011) doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/6/3/036004. 16 pages.Applicant
- Micro Electric Heaters. “Tubular Heaters” 2011. 2 pages.Applicant
- Boedeker Plastics, Inc. “Tefzel ETFE Specifications” 2015. 2 pages.Applicant
- Oleson, S. et al. “Titan Submarine: Exploring the Depths of Kraken Mare” SPACE Conferences and Exposition. Aug. 31-Sep. 2, 2015. Pasadena, CA. AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition. 15 pages.Applicant
- R. Beckhusen “To See in the Arctic, DARPA Might Stick Sensors on Icebergs” Sep. 19, 2012. http://www.wired.com/2012/09/arctic-sensors/ 5 pages.Applicant
- Demir et al. “Convex Optimization Formulation of Density Upper Bound Constraints in Markov Chain Synthesis” American Control Conference, Jun. 4-6, 2014. p. 483-488.Applicant
- Acikmese et al. “Markov Chain Approach to Probabilistic Guidance for Swarms of Autonomous Agents” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 1105-1124, Jul. 2015.Applicant
- Acikmese et al. “Probabilistic Swarm Guidance for Collaborative Autonomous Agents” American Control Conference, Jun. 4-6, 2014. p. 477-482.Applicant
- L. Daniel “Defense Department, services monitor Arctic melting”. Jun. 28, 2011, American Forces Press Service. 2 pages.Applicant
- M. Allouche, (2000) “The Integration of UAVs in Airspace”, Operations & Safety, Air & Space Europe, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 101-104.Applicant
- P. V. Blyenburgh, (1999), “UAVs: an Overview”, Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), Air & Space Europe, Wol 1, No. 5/6, pp. 43-47.Applicant
- B.A. Warneke, et al. (2002) “An autonomous 16 mm3 solar-powered node for distributed wireless sensor networks”, IEEE Sensors, vol. 2, pp. 1510-1515.Applicant
- H. Cunfu, et al. (2000) “Theoretical and experimental studies of torsion deformation of a thin-walled tube with wound and pasted shape memory alloy wires”, Journal of Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 9, pp. 660-664.Applicant
- G. Park, et al. (2002) “Dynamic testing of inflatable structures using smart materials”, Journal of Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 11, pp. 147-155.Applicant
- A. Ansari. et al. (2011) “Gallium nitride-on-silicon micromechanical overtone resonators and filters,” IEEE Electron Device Meeting (IEDM 2011), pp. 1-6.Applicant
- H.D. Griffiths et al. (2005) “Passive coherent location radar systems. Part 1: performance prediction”, IEEE Proceedings of Radar, Sonar and Navigation, vol. 152, No. 3, pp. 153-159.Applicant
- T.B. Koay, et al. (2006), “Advanced PANDA for high speed autonomous ambient noise data collection and boat tracking—system and results”, Ieee Oceans 2006—Asia Pacific, pp. 1-9.Applicant
- N. Ghafouri et al. (2008) “A Micro Thermoelectric Energy Scavenger for a Hybrid Insect”, IEEE Sensors, pp. 1249-1252.Applicant
- I. Ferreira et al. (2010) “Self-Rechargeable Paper Thin-Film Batteries: Performance and Applications”, IEEE Journal of Display Technology, vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 332-335.Applicant
- K. Najafi et al. “Microsystems for Energy Harvesting,” Invited Paper, 16th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators, and Microsystems (IEEE Transducers), Beijing China, pp. 1845-1850, Jun. 2011.Applicant
- D. S. Bayard et al. “Probabilistic Guidance for Earth Orbiting Spacecraft Swarms,” Jet Propulsion Laboratory, JPL D-72983, Apr. 10, 2012.Applicant
- B. Acikmese et al. “Probabilistic Guidance for Swarms of Autonomous Agents,” Jet Propulsion Laboratory, JPL D-73778, Jun. 21, 2012.Applicant
- Hadaegh, F. et al. “Chapter 2: New Guidance, Navigation, and Control Technologies for Formation Flying Spacecraft and Planetary Landing” Advances in Control System Technology for Aerospace Applications, Eric Feron (Ed.), Aerospace Decision and Control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences (LNCIS), Springer, 2016, pp. 49-80. ISBN: 978-3-662-47693-2.Applicant
- A. Villanueva et al. “A bio-inspired shape memory alloy composite (BISMAC) actuator”, Smart Mater. Struct. 19, 025013 (2010) 17 pages.Applicant
- Joshi, K. et al. “Modeling of Artificial Aurelia aurita Bell Deformation”, Marine Technology Society Journal 45, 165-184 (2011).Applicant
- S. Priya, “Criterion for Material Selection in Design of Bulk Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters”, IEEE Ultrason. Freq. Ferroelect. Cntrl. 57, 2610-2612 (2010).Applicant
- V. Bedekar, et al. “Pen Harvester for Pulse Rate Sensor”, J. Phys. D—Appl. Phys. 42 105105 (2009). 9 pages.Applicant
- A. Marin, et al. “Multiple cell configuration electromagnetic energy harvester”, J. Phys. D—Appl. Phys. 44, 295501 (2011). 11 pages.Applicant
- A. Marin, et al. “Multimodal Vibration Harvester Using Inductive and Magnetostrictive Mechanisms”, Integrated Ferroelectrics 125, 111-122 (2011).Applicant
- Joshi, K. et al. “Estimation of Solar Energy Harvested for Autonomous Jellyfish Vehicles (AJVs)”, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 36, No. 4, p. 539-551. Oct. 2011.Applicant
- Landau, L.D. et al. (1976). Course of Theoretical Physics: vol. 1 Mechanics. Butterworth-Heinenann. pp. 33-34. ISBN 0750628960.Applicant
- Zhao, B. et al. “Dynamics and motion control of a two pendulums driven spherical robot” Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on , vol., No., pp. 147,153, Oct. 18-22, 2010 doi: 10.1109/IROS.2010.565115.Applicant
- D. V. Balandin, D.V. et al. “A motion control for a spherical robot with pendulum drive” Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International Jul. 2013, vol. 52, Issue 4, pp. 650-663.Applicant
- Basic, G. “Power-Scavenging Tumbleweed Rover” Graduate Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Toronto (2010) 99 pages.Applicant
- Ervasti, M. et al.“iShake: Mobile Phones as Seismic Sensors—User Study Findings”, U.C. Berkeley. MUM'II, Dec. 7-9, 2011, Beijing, China. retrieved from http://glaser.berkeley.edu/glaserdrupal/pdf/cmum11%20Ervasti.pdf.Applicant
- Van Gorp et al. “Optical design and performance of the Ultra-Compact Imaging Spectrometer” Proc. SPIE 8158 pp. 81580L-2-81580L-10 (2011): doi: 10.1117/12.892422.Applicant
- Cunio et al. “Options in the solar system for planetary surface exploration via hopping”, IEEE Aerospace Conference, paper #1680, Version 4, Updated Jan. 12, 2011. 10 pages.Applicant