US 9,436,909 B2Grant
Increased dynamic range artificial neuron network apparatus and methods
Issue Date:2016-09-06
•20 Claims
•9 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
Apparatus and methods for processing inputs by one or more neurons of a network. The neuron(s) may generate spikes based on receipt of multiple inputs. Latency of spike generation may be determined based on an input magnitude. Inputs may be scaled using for example a non-linear concave transform. Scaling may increase neuron sensitivity to lower magnitude inputs, thereby improving latency encoding of small amplitude inputs. The transformation function may be configured compatible with existing non-scaling neuron processes and used as a plug-in to existing neuron models. Use of input scaling may allow for an improved network operation and reduce task simulation time.
Metadata
Assignee
- Brain Corporation
Inventors
- Filip Piekniewski
- Vadim Polonichko
- Eugene Izhikevich
Application Information
Application Number:US 13/922,143
Filing Date:2013-06-19
Priority Date:2013-06-19
Art Unit:2129
Classifications
IPC:
G06N5/00G06F1/00G06N3/08G06N3/04
Field of Search:
G06N 3/02G06N 3/049G06N 3/08G06N 3/10G06N 3/63
Patent Drawings (9 sheets)
Description
Related Applications
[0001] This application is related to co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/922,116 entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING INPUTS IN AN ARTIFICIAL NEURON NETWORK” filed contemporaneously herewith on Jun. 19, 2013, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Copyright
[0002] A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
Background
[0003] 1. Field of the Disclosure
[0004] The present disclosure relates generally to artificial neuron networks and more particularly in one exemplary aspect to computerized apparatus and methods for encoding sensory input using spiking neuron networks.
[0005] 2. Description of Related Art
[0006] Artificial spiking neural networks are frequently used to gain an understanding of biological neural networks, and for solving artificial intelligence problems. These networks typically employ a pulse-coded mechanism, which encodes information using timing of the pulses. Such pulses (also referred to as “spikes” or ‘impulses’) are short-lasting discrete temporal events, typically on the order of 1-2 milliseconds (ms). Several exemplary embodiments of such encoding are described in a commonly owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/152,084 entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR PULSE-CODE INVARIANT OBJECT RECOGNITION”, filed Jun. 2, 2011, and co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/152,119, filed Jun. 2, 2011, entitled “SENSORY INPUT PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHODS”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,942,466 on Jan. 27, 2015, each incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0007] A typical artificial spiking neural network, may comprise a plurality of units (or nodes), which may correspond to neurons in a biological neural network. A given unit may be connected to one (or more) other units via connections, also referred to as communication channels, or synaptic connections. The units providing inputs to a given unit may be referred to as the pre-synaptic units, while the unit receiving the inputs may be referred to as the post-synaptic unit.
[0008] In some applications, a unit of the network may receive inputs from multiple input synapses (up to 10,000). A neuron dynamic process may be configured to adjust neuron parameters (e.g., excitability) based on, for example, a sum of inputs Ij received via unit's input connections as:
Ī˜ΣjIj (Eqn. 1)
Ī˜ΣjIj (Eqn. 1)
[0009] As number of connections into a neuron increases, multiple spiking inputs may overwhelm the neuron process and may cause burst spiking, reduce neuron sensitivity to individual inputs, and may require manipulation of connection parameters (e.g., by using hard and or soft weight limits) in order prevent network instabilities. Accordingly, methods and apparatus are needed which, inter alia, overcome the aforementioned disabilities.
Summary
[0010] The present disclosure satisfies the foregoing needs by providing, inter alia, apparatus and methods for processing inputs to, e.g., a neuronal network.
[0011] In one aspect, a method of operating a network is disclosed. In one embodiment, the operating includes adapting an extant logical network to provide a desired functionality, and the method includes: obtaining a logical entity having a rule for processing of a plurality of inputs into a node of the logical network; placing the logical entity in communication with the node; receiving one or more inputs of the plurality of inputs; and causing the network to operate in accordance with the desired functionality based at least on a transformation of the one or more inputs by the logical entity.
[0012] In one implementation, the rule is effectuated based at least on an evaluation of a value of individual ones of the one or more inputs by the logical entity; and the logical entity is configured such that: when the evaluation indicates the value being within a range, the transformation will produce an output equal to the value; and when the evaluation indicates the value being outside the range, the transformation will produce the output being different from the value.
[0013] In another implementation, the desired functionality is characterized by a response being generated by the node, the response having a latency associated therewith; the latency falls within a first latency range configured based on the transformation of the one or more inputs; and the latency configuration effectuated based on the received one or more inputs is characterized by a second latency range, the second range being narrower than the first range.
[0014] In another implementation, individual ones of the plurality of inputs are received by the node via a plurality of connections; individual ones of the plurality of connections are characterized by efficacy configured to advance or delay time of the response generation; and the efficacy of a given one of the plurality of connections is configured to be adjusted based on a time interval between the time of the response and time of input of the plurality of inputs associated with the given connection.
[0015] In another aspect of the disclosure, an electronic device having computerized logic is disclosed. In one embodiment, the logic is configured to be placed in operation with a network node in order to: evaluate a value of an input into the node; and when the evaluation indicates that the input value is above a threshold, generate a scaled input using a concave function of the input.
[0016] In one implementation, the scaled input is characterized by magnitude that is lower than the input value magnitude.
[0017] A method of distributing computer executable instructions for operating a neuron in a spiking neuron network is also disclosed. In one embodiment, the method includes: providing a logic configured to: generate a transformed input by transformation of a plurality of spiking inputs of the neuron; and communicate the transformed input to the neuron, In one implementation, the generation of the transformed input is configured to cause the neuron to encode an input within an expanded range into a latency of a spike output, the expanded range characterized by greater span of input values compared to an input range encodable by the neuron in an absence of the logic.
[0018] In one implementation, the repository comprises a cloud-based entity; the download is effected via an operative link between a user computer and the entity; and the link is configured based on an authentication process, the authentication process configured based on at least one of (i) identity of the user; and (ii) identity of the user computer.
[0019] In a further aspect, a method of configuring an extant neural network having a plurality of neurons is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method is performed to at least alter the network's functionality without altering the network itself, and the method includes: placing computerized logic in signal communication with one or more spiking inputs of the network, the logic configured to: generate one or more transformed inputs based on the one or more spiking inputs; and communicate the one or more transformed inputs to the neural network; and utilizing the one or more transformed inputs during operation of the network.
[0020] In another aspect, a computer readable apparatus is disclosed. In one embodiment, the computer readable apparatus includes a non-transitory storage medium with at least one computer program stored thereon, the at least one computer program being configured to, when executed: generate a transformed input of a plurality of spiking inputs of a neuron of a spiking neuron network; and communicate the transformed input to the neuron; wherein the generation of the transformed input is configured to cause the neuron to encode an input within an expanded range into a latency of a spike output, the expanded range characterized by greater span of input values compared to an input range of the neuron in an absence of a transformation.
[0021] In yet another aspect, a method of adapting an extant logical network to provide a desired functionality is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method includes: placing a logical entity in communication with a node, where the logical entity is configured to process a plurality of inputs for the node of the extant logical network; receiving one or more inputs of the plurality of inputs; and causing the extant logical network to operate in accordance with the desired functionality based at least on a transformation of the one or more inputs by the logical entity; wherein the rule is effectuated based at least on an evaluation of a value of individual ones of the one or more inputs by the logical entity; and wherein the logical entity is configured such that when the evaluation indicates that the value is within a range, the transformation produces an output equal to the value; and when the evaluation indicates that the value is outside the range, the transformation produces an output different from the value.
[0022] These and other objects, features, and characteristics of the system and/or method disclosed herein, as well as the methods of operation and functions of the related elements of structure and the combination of parts and economies of manufacture, will become more apparent upon consideration of the following description and the appended claims with reference to the accompanying drawings, all of which form a part of this specification, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts in the various figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for the purpose of illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. As used in the specification and in the claims, the singular form of “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0023] FIG. 1 is a graphical illustration of a network comprising a unit with multiple input connections, according to one or more implementations.
[0024] FIG. 2 is a plot depicting input-output relationship of neuron input transformer, according to one or more implementations.
[0025] FIG. 3A is a plot depicting raw input into neuron, according to one or more implementations.
[0026] FIG. 3B is a plot depicting transformed input of FIG. 3A using input transformer of FIG. 2 , according to one or more implementations.
[0027] FIG. 4 is a plot depicting latency as a function of input magnitude, in accordance with one implementation of the disclosure.
[0028] FIG. 5A is a graphical illustration of a sensory stimulus configured to cause similar input into network of FIG. 5B , according to one or more implementations.
[0029] FIG. 5B is a graphical illustration of a network comprising unit inhibition that is configured based on input scaling, according to one or more implementations.
[0030] FIG. 6 is a logical flow diagram illustrating a method of response generation by a neuron based on accumulation of multiple compressed of inputs from individual synapses, in accordance with one or more implementations.
[0031] FIG. 7 is a logical flow diagram illustrating a method of response generation by a neuron based on compression of accumulated inputs from multiple synapses, in accordance with one or more implementations.
[0032] FIG. 8 is a logical flow diagram illustrating sensory input encoding by a spiking neuron network characterized by an expanded dynamic range of the input, in accordance with one implementation of the disclosure.
[0033] FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating a computerized system for distributing application packages, in accordance with one or more implementations.
[0034] All Figures disclosed herein are © Copyright 2013 Brain Corporation. All rights reserved.
Detailed Description
[0035] Implementations of the present disclosure will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings, which are provided as illustrative examples so as to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Notably, the figures and examples below are not meant to limit the scope of the present invention to a single implementation, but other implementations are possible by way of interchange of or combination with some or all of the described or illustrated elements. Wherever convenient, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to same or like parts.
[0036] Although the system(s) and/or method(s) of this disclosure have been described in detail for the purpose of illustration based on what is currently considered to be the most practical and preferred implementations, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that the disclosure is not limited to the disclosed implementations, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover modifications and equivalent arrangements that are within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, it is to be understood that the present disclosure contemplates that, to the extent possible, one or more features of any implementation can be combined with one or more features of any other implementation
[0037] In the present disclosure, an implementation showing a singular component should not be considered limiting; rather, the disclosure is intended to encompass other implementations including a plurality of the same component, and vice-versa, unless explicitly stated otherwise herein.
[0038] Further, the present disclosure encompasses present and future known equivalents to the components referred to herein by way of illustration.
[0039] As used herein, the term “bus” is meant generally to denote all types of interconnection or communication architecture that is used to access the synaptic and neuron memory. The “bus” could be optical, wireless, infrared or another type of communication medium. The exact topology of the bus could be for example standard “bus”, hierarchical bus, network-on-chip, address-event-representation (AER) connection, or other type of communication topology used for accessing, e.g., different memories in pulse-based system.
[0040] As used herein, the terms “computer”, “computing device”, and “computerized device”, include, but are not limited to, personal computers (PCs) and minicomputers, whether desktop, laptop, or otherwise, mainframe computers, workstations, servers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), handheld computers, embedded computers, programmable logic device, personal communicators, tablet or “phablet” computers, portable navigation aids, J2ME equipped devices, cellular telephones, smart phones, personal integrated communication or entertainment devices, or literally any other device capable of executing a set of instructions and processing an incoming data signal.
[0041] As used herein, the term “computer program” or “software” is meant to include any sequence or human or machine cognizable steps which perform a function. Such program may be rendered in virtually any programming language or environment including, for example, C/C++, C#, Fortran, COBOL, MATLAB™, PASCAL, Python, assembly language, markup languages (e.g., HTML, SGML, XML, VoXML), and the like, as well as object-oriented environments such as the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), Java™ (including J2ME, Java Beans), Binary Runtime Environment (e.g., BREW), and other languages.
[0042] As used herein, the terms “connection”, “link”, “synaptic channel”, “transmission channel”, “delay line”, are meant generally to denote a causal link between any two or more entities (whether physical or logical/virtual), which enables information exchange between the entities.
[0043] As used herein, the term “memory” includes any type of integrated circuit or other storage device adapted for storing digital data including, without limitation, ROM. PROM, EEPROM, DRAM, Mobile DRAM, SDRAM, DDR/2 SDRAM, EDO/FPMS, RLDRAM, SRAM, “flash” memory (e.g., NAND/NOR), memristor memory, and PSRAM.
[0044] As used herein, the terms “processor”, “microprocessor” and “digital processor” are meant generally to include all types of digital processing devices including, without limitation, digital signal processors (DSPs), reduced instruction set computers (RISC), general-purpose (CISC) processors, microprocessors, gate arrays (e.g., field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs)), PLDs, reconfigurable computer fabrics (RCFs), array processors, secure microprocessors, and application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Such digital processors may be contained on a single unitary IC die, or distributed across multiple components.
[0045] As used herein, the term “network interface” refers to any signal, data, or software interface with a component, network or process including, without limitation, those of the FireWire (e.g., FW400, FW800, etc.), USB (e.g., USB2), Ethernet (e.g., 10/100, 10/100/1000 (Gigabit Ethernet), 10-Gig-E, etc.), MoCA, Coaxsys (e.g., TVnet™), radio frequency tuner (e.g., in-band or OOB, cable modem, etc.), Wi-Fi (802.11), WiMAX (802.16), PAN (e.g., 802.15), cellular (e.g., 3G, LTE/LTE-A/TD-LTE, GSM, etc.) or IrDA families.
[0046] As used herein, the terms “pulse”, “spike”, “burst of spikes”, and “pulse train” are meant generally to refer to, without limitation, any type of a pulsed signal, e.g., a rapid change in some characteristic of a signal, e.g., amplitude, intensity, phase or frequency, from a baseline value to a higher or lower value, followed by a rapid return to the baseline value and may refer to any of a single spike, a burst of spikes, an electronic pulse, a pulse in voltage, a pulse in electrical current, a software representation of a pulse and/or burst of pulses, a software message representing a discrete pulsed event, and any other pulse or pulse type associated with a discrete information transmission system or mechanism.
[0047] As used herein, the term “receptive field” is used to describe sets of weighted inputs from filtered input elements, where the weights may be adjusted.
[0048] As used herein, the term “Wi-Fi” refers to, without limitation, any of the variants of IEEE-Std. 802.11 or related standards including 802.11a/b/g/n/s/v and 802.11-2012.
[0049] As used herein, the term “wireless” means any wireless signal, data, communication, or other interface including without limitation Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 3G (3GPP/3GPP2), HSDPA/HSUPA, TDMA, CDMA (e.g., IS-95A, WCDMA, etc.), FHSS, DSSS, GSM, PAN/802.15, WiMAX (802.16), 802.20, narrowband/FDMA, OFDM, PCS/DCS, LTE/LTE-A/TD-LTE, analog cellular, CDPD, RFID or NFC (e.g., EPC Global Gen. 2, ISO 14443, ISO 18000-3), satellite systems, millimeter wave or microwave systems, acoustic, and infrared (e.g., IrDA).
[0050] The present disclosure provides, in one salient aspect, apparatus and methods for implementing mechanism for processing of excitatory stimulus by a node of computerized neuron network. The stimulus may be based on sensory input may comprise, for example, an audio signal, a stream of video frames, and/or other input. In some implementations, such as described with respect to FIG. 10 below) the sensory input may comprise image frames received from an image sensor (such as a charge-coupled device (CCD), CMOS device, and/or an active-pixel sensor (APS), photodiode arrays, etc.). In one or more implementations, the input may comprise a pixel stream downloaded from a file, such as a stream of two-dimensional matrices of red green blue RGB values (e.g., refreshed at a 25 Hz or other suitable frame rate). It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art when given this disclosure that the above-referenced image parameters are merely exemplary, and many other image representations (e.g., bitmap, luminance-chrominance (YUV, YCbCr), cyan-magenta-yellow and key (CMYK), grayscale, etc.) are equally applicable to and useful with the various aspects of the present disclosure. Furthermore, data frames corresponding to other (non-visual) signal modalities such as sonograms, IR, radar or tomography images are equally compatible with the processing methodology of the disclosure, or yet other configurations.
[0051] Referring now to FIG. 1 , one implementation of a network comprising a unit configured to receive multiple inputs is shown and described. The network 100 may comprise neuron 110 coupled to multiple connections (e.g., 102, 104). Individual connections may be characterized by connection efficacy, denoted by circle 106. Connection efficacy, which in general may refer to a magnitude and/or probability of input spike influence on neuronal response (i.e., output spike generation or firing), and may comprise, for example a parameter e.g., synaptic weight by which one or more state variables of post synaptic unit are changed. During operation of the pulse-code network, synaptic weights may be dynamically adjusted using what is referred to as the spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) in order to implement, among other things, network learning. In one or more implementations, the STDP mechanism may comprise a rate-modulated plasticity mechanism such as, for example, that is described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/774,934, filed Feb. 22, 2013 and entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR RATE-MODULATED PLASTICITY IN A SPIKING NEURON NETWORK”, and/or bi-modal plasticity mechanism, for example, such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/763,005, entitled “SPIKING NETWORK APPARATUS AND METHOD WITH BIMODAL SPIKE-TIMING DEPENDENT PLASTICITY”, filed Feb. 8, 2013 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,177,245 on Nov. 3, 2015, each of the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0052] Various neuron dynamic processes may be utilized with the methodology of the present disclosure including for example, integrate-and-fire (IF), Izhikevich simple model, spike response process (SRP), stochastic process such as, for example, described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/487,533, entitled SYSTEMS AND APPARATUS FOR IMPLEMENTING TASK-SPECIFIC LEARNING USING SPIKING NEURONS”, filed Jun. 4, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,146,546 on Sep. 29, 2015, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In some implementations, the network may comprise heterogeneous neuron population comprising neurons of two or more types governed by their respective processes.
[0053] The unit 110 may receive inputs from thousands of connections (up to 10,000 in some implementations). Dynamic process of the unit 110 may be configured to adjust process parameters (e.g., excitability) based on magnitude of received inputs. Unit process may be updated at time intervals. In some implementations, the process update may be effectuated on a periodic basis at Δt=1 ms intervals. For a given update at time t, inputs Sj received by the unit 110 via i-th connection (e.g., element 104 in FIG. 1 ) within time interval Δt since preceding update (at time t−Δt) may be expressed as:
Ij={Sj(t−Δt:t)},Sj(t)˜wj(t)) (Eqn. 2)
where wj(t) denotes efficacy associated with j-th connection at spike time.
Ij={Sj(t−Δt:t)},Sj(t)˜wj(t)) (Eqn. 2)
where wj(t) denotes efficacy associated with j-th connection at spike time.
[0054] Input of Eqn. 2 may contribute to adjustment of unit excitability at time t as described below with respect to Eqn. 10 through Eqn. 16. It may be desirable to configure process of neuron 110 to operate in a near sub-threshold regime, wherein inputs from any two connections (e.g., 104, 102 in FIG. 1 ) may cause neuron response (e.g., generate spike output). In some implementations such sub-threshold operation may be configured to enhance sensitivity to lower amplitude inputs, compared to the prior art. The sensitivity enhancement may be effectuated based on, in one implementation, the exemplary nonlinear input summation methodology described in detail below.
[0055] The methodology may comprise transforming the input using a nonlinear concave function, e.g., expressed for a given x, y in the interval, as:
ƒ(tx+(1−t)y)≧tƒ(x)+(1−t)ƒ(y) (Eqn. 3)
where t may be selected from an interval [0,1].
ƒ(tx+(1−t)y)≧tƒ(x)+(1−t)ƒ(y) (Eqn. 3)
where t may be selected from an interval [0,1].
[0056] FIG. 2 illustrates various exemplary implementations, of concave nonlinear transform functions that may be utilized in order to scale input into neuron. Curves 204, 206 depict logarithmic and square root scaling; curve 202 depicts a scaling function that may be expressed in some implementations as:
[0057]
[0058] It is noteworthy that scaling of Eqn. 4 is configured to transfer input of wide (e.g., unknown magnitude) into output characterized by a known fixed range (e.g., from 0 to 1 in FIG. 2 ).
[0059] FIGS. 3A-3B illustrate input scaling using the exemplary formulation of Eqn. 4. Curves 302, 304, 306 in FIG. 3A depict the magnitude of original input (associated with three individual connections) into a neuron as a function of time. Curves 312, 314, 316 in FIG. 3B depict the magnitude of scaled input (corresponding to the curves 302, 304, 306 of FIG. A, respectively).
[0060] In some implementations, at iteration time 4 the cumulative input into a neuron may be determined as a linear combination of scaled inputs from one or more connections into the neuron, as follows:
Ic (t)=F(Ic (t−Δt)+Σiƒ(Ij)) (Eqn. 5)
[0061] Various concave transformations may be utilized with Eqn. 5 including, for example, Eqn. 4, curves 202, 204 206 of FIG. 2 and/or other dependencies. In one or more implementations, the transformation may be characterized as follows:
ƒ(a)+ƒ(b)>ƒ(a+b),a,bεR (Eqn. 6)
f(a)+ƒ(b)<ƒ(a+b),a,bεR (Eqn. 7)
ƒ(a)+ƒ(b)>ƒ(a+b),a,bεR (Eqn. 6)
f(a)+ƒ(b)<ƒ(a+b),a,bεR (Eqn. 7)
[0062] A concave transformation (e.g., according to Eqn. 3 and/or Eqn. 6, Eqn. 6) may produce transformed output configured such that a sum of given transformed values a,b, is smaller than transform of a sum of the values wherein the values a,b belong to a range R1. In some implementations, (e.g., of a square root and/or logarithm) the range R1 may comprise the range from 1 to infinity. A concave transformation may produce transformed output configured such that a sum of given transformed values a,b, is greater than transform of a sum of the values wherein the values a,b belong to a range R2. In some implementations, (e.g., of a square root and/or logarithm) the range R2 may comprise the range from zero to 1. Such properties (e.g., Eqn. 6) may produce transformed combined input that is smaller in magnitude than the combined input thereby reducing input into a neuron.
[0063] In some implementations, wherein input comprises large magnitude signal (e.g., greater than 1), the input transformation may be configured in accordance with one of comprise one of Eqn. 6-Eqn. 6 dependencies, e.g., Eqn. 6. Range of inputs for one such realization is denoted by the arrow 212 in FIG. 2 .
[0064] In some implementations, wherein input comprises small magnitude signal (e.g., less than 1), the input transformation may be configured in accordance with Eqn. 6 dependency. Range of inputs for such realization is denoted by the arrow 214 in FIG. 2 . Transformations performed in accordance with one or Eqn. 6 and/or Eqn. 6 may be referred to as the one-sided transformations.
[0065] Neuron dynamic parameters (e.g., membrane potential) may be updated using, for example, the following update process:
ν(t)˜F(ν(t−Δt),t,Īc(t)) (Eqn. 8)
where Δt is iteration time step, and the function F( ) describes neuron process dynamics. Cumulative input of Eqn. 5 may be adjusted using for example the following decay formulation:
Īc(t+Δt)=αĪc(t) (Eqn. 9)
where the parameter α may be selected from the range between e.g., 0 and 0.9999 in some implementations.
ν(t)˜F(ν(t−Δt),t,Īc(t)) (Eqn. 8)
where Δt is iteration time step, and the function F( ) describes neuron process dynamics. Cumulative input of Eqn. 5 may be adjusted using for example the following decay formulation:
Īc(t+Δt)=αĪc(t) (Eqn. 9)
where the parameter α may be selected from the range between e.g., 0 and 0.9999 in some implementations.
[0066] In one or more implementations, the cumulative input into neuron process may be determined based on a linear combination of all inputs from one or more connections into the neuron:
Ī(t)=Ī(t−Δt)+ΣjIj, (Eqn. 10)
Ī(t)=Ī(t−Δt)+ΣjIj, (Eqn. 10)
[0067] Neuron dynamic parameters (e.g., membrane potential) may be updated based on transformed cumulative input (e.g., of Eqn. 10) as follows:
ν(t)˜F1(ν(t−Δt),t,ƒ(Ī(t))) (Eqn. 11)
where the function F1( ) denotes neuron dynamic process. Various concave transformations may be utilized with Eqn. 11 Eqn. 11 including, for example, Eqn. 4, curves 202, 204 206 ofFIG. 2 and/or other dependencies. The cumulative input of Eqn. 10 may be adjusted, in order to discount older observations, using the following decay formulation:
Ī(t+Δt)=γĪ(t) (Eqn. 12)
where the parameter γ may be selected from the range between e.g., 0 and 0.9999 in some implementations.
ν(t)˜F1(ν(t−Δt),t,ƒ(Ī(t))) (Eqn. 11)
where the function F1( ) denotes neuron dynamic process. Various concave transformations may be utilized with Eqn. 11 Eqn. 11 including, for example, Eqn. 4, curves 202, 204 206 of
Ī(t+Δt)=γĪ(t) (Eqn. 12)
where the parameter γ may be selected from the range between e.g., 0 and 0.9999 in some implementations.
[0068] In one or more implementations, the cumulative input into the neuron process at time t may be determined based on e.g., a scaled combination of previously scaled combined inputs at time t−Δt, and combined inputs from one or more connections into the neuron at time t, represented as:
Īc1(t)=ƒ[Īc1(t−Δt)+Ī] (Eqn. 13)
Īc1(t)=ƒ[Īc1(t−Δt)+Ī] (Eqn. 13)
[0069] Various concave transformations may be utilized with Eqn. 13, such as, for example, described above with respect to Eqn. 5. Neuron dynamic parameters (e.g., membrane potential) may be updated as follows:
ν(t)˜F2(ν(t−Δt),t,Īc1(t)) (Eqn. 14)
where F3( ) describes neuron process dynamics. The cumulative input of Eqn. 13 may be adjusted in order, for example, to implement a “discount” of past observations, using the following decay formulation:
Īc1(t+Δt)=βĪc1(t) (Eqn. 15)
where the parameter β may be selected from the range between e.g., 0 and 0.9999 in some implementations. The transformation of the cumulative input Ī may be configured to provide output in a given range (e.g., [0, 10] in one or more implementations, as follows:
ν(t)˜F2(ν(t−Δt),t,Īc1(t)) (Eqn. 14)
where F3( ) describes neuron process dynamics. The cumulative input of Eqn. 13 may be adjusted in order, for example, to implement a “discount” of past observations, using the following decay formulation:
Īc1(t+Δt)=βĪc1(t) (Eqn. 15)
where the parameter β may be selected from the range between e.g., 0 and 0.9999 in some implementations. The transformation of the cumulative input Ī may be configured to provide output in a given range (e.g., [0, 10] in one or more implementations, as follows:
[0070]
where parameters a,b may be configured to determine output range. By way of illustration, a parameter configuration of a=10, b=9 may provide an output in the range from 0 to 10.
where parameters a,b may be configured to determine output range. By way of illustration, a parameter configuration of a=10, b=9 may provide an output in the range from 0 to 10.
[0071] In some implementations configured to implement input accumulation (e.g., history), the input transformation may be configured based on current cumulative input Ī(t), and a previous scaled input Īc(t−Δt), expressed as:
Īc(t)=ƒ(Ī(t),Īc(t−Δt)) (Eqn. 17)
Īc(t)=ƒ(Ī(t),Īc(t−Δt)) (Eqn. 17)
[0072] Decay of scaled input between iterations may be described, for example, as:
Īc(t+Δt)=G(Īc(t)), (Eqn. 18)
where the function G( ) may comprise a multiplicative scaling by a constant (e.g., of Eqn. 15), and/or be described by a dynamic process (e.g., differential equation).
Īc(t+Δt)=G(Īc(t)), (Eqn. 18)
where the function G( ) may comprise a multiplicative scaling by a constant (e.g., of Eqn. 15), and/or be described by a dynamic process (e.g., differential equation).
[0073] Input transformation of the disclosure (e.g., according to Eqn. 4, Eqn. 5, Eqn. 11, Eqn. 16 may be implemented using a software library, a software component, (e.g., a plug-into an existing neuron network realization), a hardware compressor (e.g., implemented in an integrated circuit such as an FPGA, an ASIC, and/or other), and/or using other realizations, including combinations of the foregoing.
[0074] In one or more implementations configured to enable plug-in functionality, the input transformation may be configured so as to preserve (e.g., pass through) input of a certain magnitude (e.g., 1) and/or magnitude range (e.g., between Imin and Imax) as follows:
ƒ(I0)=I0. (Eqn. 19)
ƒ(I0)=I0. (Eqn. 19)
[0075] Unity gain of the realization of Eqn. 19 may be employed in order to enable compatibility of the input scaling methodology with existing neuron network implementations. In some implementations, the input scaling may be implemented into a portion of neurons, e.g., that may be receiving inputs from many (e.g., more than 1000) connections. The remaining neurons of the network may be configured to operate without input scaling.
[0076] In some implementations, the input scaling methodology described herein (e.g., with respect to Eqn. 3-Eqn. 19) may be effectuated using a look-up table (LUT) or other comparable data structure. In one such realization, the LUT utilization may comprise one or more logical operations configured to determine whether the input is within the scaling range (e.g., greater or equal Imax or smaller than) or within the bypass range (e.g., smaller than Imax and greater or equal Imin).
[0077] The input scaling methodology described herein (e.g., with respect to Eqn. 4-Eqn. 19) may provide confined variations of input(s) into a neuron into a given range, enable more stable implementations of computerized neuron dynamic processes (e.g., characterized by faster convergence and/or reduced output variations), while still maintaining near sub-threshold regime of neuron operation (e.g., wherein inputs from any two connections (e.g., 104, 102 in FIG. 1 ) may cause neuron response).
[0078] It may be desired to utilize spiking neuron networks in order to encode sensory input into spike latency, such as for example as described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/869,583, filed Aug. 26, 2010, and entitled “INVARIANT PULSE LATENCY CODING SYSTEMS AND METHODS”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,467,623 on Jun. 18, 2013; co-owned U.S. Pat. No. 8,315,305, issued Nov. 20, 2012, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INVARIANT PULSE LATENCY CODING”; co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/152,084, filed Jun. 2, 2011, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR PULSE-CODE INVARIANT OBJECT RECOGNITION”; and/or latency encoding comprising a temporal winner take all mechanism described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/757,607, filed Feb. 1, 2013 and entitled “TEMPORAL WINNER TAKES ALL SPIKING NEURON NETWORK SENSORY PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHODS”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,070,039 on Jun. 30, 2015, each of the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0079] In some implementations, latency encoding may be employed for object recognition and/or classification may be implemented using spiking neuron classifier comprising conditionally independent subsets, such as e.g., that described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/756,372 filed Jan. 31, 2013, and entitled “SPIKING NEURON CLASSIFIER APPARATUS AND METHODS USING CONDITIONALLY INDEPENDENT SUBSETS”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,195,934 on Nov. 24, 2015, and/or co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/756,382 filed Jan. 31, 2013, and entitled “REDUCED LATENCY SPIKING NEURON CLASSIFIER APPARATUS AND METHODS”, each of the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0080] In one or more implementations, encoding may be based on adaptive adjustment of neuron parameters, such neuron excitability described in for example co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/623,820 entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR ENCODING OF SENSORY DATA USING ARTIFICIAL SPIKING NEURONS”, filed Sep. 20, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,047,568 on Jun. 2, 2015, and/or co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/540,429, entitled “SENSORY PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHODS”, filed Jul. 2, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,014,416 on Apr. 21, 2015, each of the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0081] In one or more implementations, encoding may be effectuated by a network comprising a plasticity mechanism such as, for example, the mechanisms described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/465,924, entitled “SPIKING NEURAL NETWORK FEEDBACK APPARATUS AND METHODS”, filed May 7, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,129,221 on Sep. 8, 2015, co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/488,106, entitled “SPIKING NEURON NETWORK APPARATUS AND METHODS”, filed Jun. 4, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,098,811 on Aug. 4, 2015, co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/541,531, entitled “CONDITIONAL PLASTICITY SPIKING NEURON NETWORK APPARATUS AND METHODS”, filed Jul. 3, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,111,215 on Aug. 18, 2015, co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/548,071, entitled “SPIKING NEURON NETWORK SENSORY PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHODS”, filed Jul. 12, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,582 on Mar. 10, 2015, co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/660,967, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR ACTIVITY-BASED PLASTICITY IN A SPIKING NEURON NETWORK”, filed Oct. 25, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,972,315 on Mar. 3, 2015, co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/691,554, entitled “RATE STABILIZATION THROUGH PLASTICITY IN SPIKING NEURON NETWORK”, filed Nov. 30, 2012, each of the foregoing incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
[0082] In some implementations, the input transformation methodology of the disclosure may be employed to extend the useful range of signal latency encoding, as described in detail with respect to the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 4 below.
[0083] Curves 402, 404 of FIG. 4 depict latency output as a function of input into an encoder obtained using a latency encoder of the prior art, and a latency encoder configured based on input signal scaling of the present disclosure, respectively. Rectangle 410 in FIG. 4 denotes the useful range of the prior art encoder operation. In some implementations, the useful range may (in general) be determined based on two individual inputs with different magnitudes (e.g., I1=7, I2=9, denoted by squares and triangles, respectively, in FIG. 4 ), thereby causing generation of two latency outputs that are discernible from one another. Discrimination margins for input and latency differentiation may be configured based on the particular application. In some implementations, inputs whose magnitudes differ by at least one unit may be referred to as “different”; latency whose magnitude may differ by at least more than 0.1 may be referred to as “different”.
[0084] As may be seen from FIG. 4 , encoding of the prior art (shown by the open square 418 and the open triangle 420) encode two substantially different inputs (magnitude 7 and 9) into latency values that are close in magnitude to one another (e.g., within 0.03). Contrast this outcome with the data obtained using input scaling of the disclosure (curve 400) which is capable of encoding the same two inputs (solid rectangle 414 and solid triangle 416) into latency values that are clearly distinct from one another (e.g., by 0.6). Transformation of the input (e.g., using methodology of Eqn. 16) shown in FIG. 4 advantageously enables extension of useful encoding range (shown by rectangle 412) of input, in this example by the amount depicted by the arrow 406.
[0085] In some applications, for example such as illustrated and described with respect to FIG. 5A , multiple nodes of a sensory processing network may receive inputs that may be close to one another in magnitude. By way of illustration and as shown in FIG. 5A , sensory input may comprise e.g., a representation of a bar 530 oriented at 10°. In one or more implementations, the sensory input may comprise for instance an output of an imaging CCD or CMOS/APS array of sensing apparatus. The visual input may comprise digitized frame pixel values (RGB, CMYK, grayscale) refreshed at a suitable rate. Individual frames may comprise representations of an object that may be moving across field of view In one or more implementations, the sensory input may comprise other sensory modalities, such as somatosensory and/or olfactory, or yet other types of inputs (e.g., radio frequency waves, ultrasonic waves), as will be recognized by those of ordinary skill given the present disclosure.
[0086] The input 530 may be provided to a plurality of neurons configured to respond to bars of various orientations. Two neurons (e.g., 534, 532) may be configured for example to respond to a vertically oriented bar and bar oriented at 20°, respectively. The resultant stimulus into neurons 532, 534 may be determined based on a intersection of the bar representation 530 and the respective receptive field (e.g., 536, 538). In some implementations, the intersection may comprise a product of input pixels within the bar 530 and the receptive field; the resultant stimulus may be determined as e.g., a weighted average of pixels within the intersect area, e.g., shown by the black shapes 540, 542, respectively. The capability to encode similar stimuli into distinct latency values (that are separated from one another by wider margin as compared to the prior art) may improve the operation of neuron network encoders configured to process sensory signals comprising stimuli of close magnitudes (e.g., 540, 542).
[0087] It is noteworthy that both of the inputs 506, 508 may be configured at a comparatively large amplitude (e.g., in the top 50% percentile) in order to cause a response due to presence of a single, well-defined feature. Accordingly, simple linear input compression (e.g., lowering of the input strengths) of the prior art may be insufficient for causing the inhibition configuration illustrated and described with respect to FIGS. 5A-5B .
[0088] FIG. 5B illustrates network 500 comprising neurons 502, 504 configured to receive inputs 506, 508. In order to enable competition, the neurons 502, 504 may be coupled to one another via inhibitory connections 516, 518. In or more implementations, the inputs 506, 508 may comprise output of detector network layer configured to detect one or more features (e.g., an edge) and/or objects. By way of illustration, input 508 may comprise magnitude of 7, while input 506 may comprise magnitude of 7.7. In accordance with encoding implementation comprising input scaling and shown by the curve 400 in FIG. 4 , stronger input 508 may cause an earlier response by the neuron 504, compared to the response by the neuron 502 responsive to the input 506. The timing difference (e.g., of 0.23 for the encoding of curve 406) between the responses of two neurons may enable the neuron 504 to provide an inhibitory signal via the connection 516 to the neuron 502 configured with sufficient latency margin. In one or more implementations, the latency margin between the occurrence of the input 506, 508 and occurrence of the inhibition signal 516, 516, respectively may be selected from the range between 1 ms and 10 ms, although it will be readily appreciated that other values may be used as well consistent with the disclosure.
[0089] Inhibitory signal of sufficient efficacy provided by the neuron 504 via the connection 516 may delay, and/or altogether prevent generation of response by the neuron 502. Any applicable inhibition mechanisms may be utilized, such as for example the mechanisms described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/548,071, entitled “SPIKING NEURON NETWORK SENSORY PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHODS”, filed Jul. 12, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,582 on Mar. 10, 2015, and/or co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/710,042, entitled “CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT SPIKING NEURON NETWORK SENSORY PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHODS”, filed Dec. 10, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,123,127 on Sep. 1, 2015, each of the foregoing being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Inhibition of the neuron 502 by the neuron 504 (and/or vice versa). Inhibition of one of the neurons 502, 504 may advantageously enable a single neuron (of neurons 502, 504) to responds to a given feature, and/or prevent synchronous response by many neurons to the same feature thereby increasing input differentiation. It is noteworthy that the network configuration of the prior art (e.g., without input scaling) may cause near-simultaneous responses by both neurons 502, 504, thereby not providing or allowing for the ability to discriminate between receptive fields 536, 538.
[0090] FIGS. 6-8 illustrate exemplary methods of using the nonlinear input summation mechanism(s) described herein for operating neuron networks. The operation of the exemplary methods 600, 700, 800 presented below are intended to be merely illustrative, and in no way limiting on the broader principles of the disclosure. In some implementations, methods 600, 700, 800 may be accomplished with one or more additional operations not described, and/or without one or more of the operations discussed. Additionally, the order in which the operations of methods 600, 700, 800 (or individual steps or sub-steps therein) are illustrated in FIGS. 6-8 and described below is not intended to be limiting.
[0091] In some implementations, the methods 600, 700, 800 may be implemented in one or more processing devices (e.g., a digital processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information). The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices executing some or all of the operations of methods 600, 700, 800 in response to instructions stored electronically on an electronic storage medium. The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices configured through hardware, firmware, and/or software to be specifically designed for execution of one or more of the operations of the methods 600, 700, 800.
[0092] At operation 602 of the method 600, illustrated in FIG. 6 , an input may be received from a given connection of a unit (e.g., the connection 104 of unit 110 in FIG. 1 ). In one or more implementations, the input may comprise e.g., one or more spikes configured based on presence of an object.
[0093] At operation 604 the input for the given connection may be transformed. In one or more implementations, the input transformations may be based on a non-linear concave scaling function, such as, for example, that described with respect to FIG. 2 and/or Eqn. 4.
[0094] At operation 606, the transformed input(s) of multiple connections into the unit may be combined. In one or more implementations, the input combination may comprise e.g., a weighted sum.
[0095] At operation 608, the unit dynamic process may be updated based on the accumulated transformed input obtained at operation 606. In some implementations, the neuron update may be effectuated using, for example, Eqn. 8.
[0096] At operation 610, a determination may be made as to whether response is to be generated by the neuron based on the updated excitability. In one or more implementations, the response generation may be based on e.g., the membrane potential of the neuron process breaching a firing threshold.
[0097] At operation 612, latency of a response may be determined. In some implementations, the latency determination of operation 612 may be characterized by an expanded dynamic range of the input, e.g., such as that shown in FIG. 4 .
[0098] FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary method of response generation by a neuron based on transformation of accumulated inputs from multiple synapses, in accordance with one or more implementations.
[0099] At operation 722 of method 700, illustrated in FIG. 7 , an input into a unit of a network may be accumulated. In some implementations, input accumulation may be based on a combination of inputs be received by the unit via multiple connections (e.g., the connection 104 of unit 110 in FIG. 1 ). The combination may comprise for instance a weighted sum. In one or more implementations, the input may comprise one or more spikes configured based on, e.g., presence of an object (e.g., the bar 530 in FIG. 5A ).
[0100] At operation 724, the accumulated input may be transformed. In one or more implementations, the input transformation may be based on a non-linear concave function, such as, for example, that described with respect to FIG. 2 and/or Eqn. 4.
[0101] At operation 726, a unit dynamic process may be updated based on the accumulated transformed input obtained at operation 726. In some implementations, the neuron update may be effectuated using, for example, Eqn. 8.
[0102] At operation 728, a determination may be made as to whether response is to be generated by the neuron based on the updated excitability. In one or more implementations, the response generation may be based on the membrane potential of the neuron process breaching a firing threshold.
[0103] At operation 730, a latency of a response may be determined. In some implementations, the latency determination of operation 730 may be characterized by an expanded dynamic range of the input, e.g., such as shown in FIG. 4 .
[0104] FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary increased sensitivity method for encoding a magnitude of a sensory input to a neuron into latency, such as for use in a signal processing spiking neuron network processing sensory input, in accordance with one implementation of the disclosure.
[0105] At operation 802 of method 800 of FIG. 8 , a network may be operated. The network may comprise one or more neurons operable in accordance with neuron process. The neuron process may be codified to encode sensory input. In one or more implementations, the sensory input may comprise visual input, such as for example, ambient light received by a lens in a visual capturing device (e.g., telescope, motion or still camera, microscope, portable video recording device, smartphone, security camera, IR sensor). In some cases, the visual input encoded at operation 602 may comprise for instance an output of an imaging CCD or CMOS/APS array of sensing device. For example, processing apparatus used with method 700 may be configured for the processing of digitized images (e.g., portable video recording and communications device). The visual input of step 602 may comprise digitized frame pixel values (RGB, CMYK, grayscale) refreshed at a suitable rate. Individual frames may comprise representations of an object that may be moving across field of view of the sensor. In some applications, such as, an artificial retinal prosthetic, the input of operation 602 may be a visual input, and the encoder may comprise for example one or more diffusively coupled photoreceptive layer as described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/540,429, entitled “SENSORY PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHODS”, filed Jul. 2, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,014,416 on Apr. 21, 2015, incorporated supra. In one or more implementations, the sensory input of operation 602 may comprise other sensory modalities, such as somatosensory and/or olfactory, or yet other types of inputs (e.g., radio frequency waves, ultrasonic waves) as will be recognized by those of ordinary skill given the present disclosure.
[0106] Input encoding of operation 802 may be performed using any of applicable methodologies described herein, or yet others which will be recognized by those of ordinary skill given the present disclosure. In some implementations, the encoding may comprise the latency encoding mechanism described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/869,583, entitled “INVARIANT PULSE LATENCY CODING SYSTEMS AND METHODS”, filed Aug. 26, 2010 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,467,623 on Jun. 18, 2013, incorporated supra. In one or more implementations, representations of the object (views) may be encoded into spike patterns.
[0107] In some implementations of visual input processing, such as described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/623,820, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR ENCODING OF SENSORY DATA USING ARTIFICIAL SPIKING NEURONS”, filed Sep. 20, 2012 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,047,568 on Jun. 2, 2015, incorporated supra, the detector neuron may generate a response indicative of an object being present in sensory input
[0108] At operation 804 of method 800 of FIG. 8 , logic may be provided. The logic may interface with a neuron. In some realizations, the logic may be configured to implement transformation of input into the neuron in accordance with, for example, Eqn. 3-Eqn. 19.
[0109] At operation 806 of method 800 of FIG. 8 the neuron may be operated using the neuron process and the input transformation by the logic. In one or more implementations, the operation 806 may be configured based on methodology of Eqn. 8, Eqn. 11 and/or other.
[0110] At operation 808 of method 800 of FIG. 8 latency of a response generated by the neuron may be determined. The latency may be configured in accordance with the input transformation by the logic, e.g., as shown and described with respect to FIG. 4 . By employing the transformation of, e.g., Eqn. 6, encoding dynamic range may be expanded so as to enable encoder operation in a wider range of inputs providing wider range of outputs (e.g., shown by the rectangle 412 in FIG. 4 )
[0111] Various aspects of the present disclosure may also advantageously be applied to the design and operation of apparatus configured to process sensory data.
[0112] In some implementations, where neurons of a network are configured based on a finite difference approach, scaling input(s) into a known range (e.g., using Eqn. 16) may reduce potential network numerical instabilities, and/or enable the network to process inputs of wider dynamic range, compared to the prior art. Widening of the input dynamic range may be of benefit when processing natural stimuli under varying conditions (e.g., video input obtained in bright sunlight, shade, and/or dusk, audio input due to thunder claps, sound of jet engines, whispers, sounds of rustling leaves, and/or explosives noise, and/or other inputs). Network configuration, wherein the input magnitude may be limited to a given range, may allow for an increased iteration time step, thereby reducing computational load associated with the network operation.
[0113] In some implementations, input transformation may increase network sensitivity to sparse inputs and/or reduce probability of pathological synchronized activity in the presence of multiple strong inputs. In particular, providing inputs to a neuron that are configured within a given range may enable use of faster fixed step integration methods of the neuronal state, compared to providing of inputs in a varying range. Use of the transformation methodology describe herein may enable to obtain and/or utilize strong individual synapses (e.g., synapses characterized by larger efficacy) as compared to the prior art solutions. Stronger individual synapses may elicit neuron response even for weaker inputs (compared to the prior art) thus enabling the network to respond to less frequent and/or weaker stimuli. Combining an ability of the network to respond to both strong inputs (e.g., intensity values in the top 25th percentile) with the ability to respond to weaker values (e.g., intensity values within the lower 25th percentile) may enable processing of inputs in a wider dynamic range without the need to tune the network. Furthermore, ability to differentiate individual high-magnitude (e.g., top 25th percentile) inputs by individual neurons employing input transformation, may enable selective response to individual high-magnitude inputs with greater latency discrimination, compared to the prior art.
[0114] The exemplary embodiments of the input transformation approach of the disclosure may obviate the need for explicit connection weight management (via, e.g., ad hoc or dynamic thresholds) of the prior art, thereby advantageously simplifying network operation and/or reducing computational load associated with the network operation. Such computational efficiencies may be leveraged for e.g., reducing energy use, utilization of less costly, and/or simpler computational platform for fulfilling a given task, as compared to the prior art.
[0115] In one or more implementations of latency input encoding/input transformation described herein may enable encoding of two or more inputs of similar magnitudes into latency values that are separated by a wider margin compared to the prior art. Such outcome may, inter alia, reduce (and/or altogether prevent) synchronous response by multiple neurons of the network to the same stimulus, thereby increasing receptive field variability, and allowing to discriminate larger number of features in the input. In one or more implementations, input scaling may extend operating range of the encoder neuron, (e.g., illustrated in FIG. 4 ), compared to the prior art.
[0116] In one or more implementations, the transformation may be configured (e.g., as shown by Eqn. 19) to pass through unchanged inputs of certain magnitude. Such realizations may enable incorporation of the transformation functionality into existing networks and/or existing neuron models such as via, e.g., a plug-in. The plug-in functionality may be aided by configuring the input transformation independent of the synapse dynamic process.
[0117] In some implementations, input scaling may comprise compression of the input dynamic range thereby enabling neuron stable operation when receiving inputs from a large number (1,000 to 10,000) of connections while at the same time maintaining near-threshold operation configured to respond to inputs from as few as two connections.
[0118] Exemplary embodiments of processes and architectures for providing input scaling functionality are disclosed herein as well. In one exemplary implementation, a web-based repository of network plug-ins “images” (e.g., processor-executable instructions configured to implement input transformation and/or scaling in a neuron network) is introduced. Developers may utilize e.g., a “cloud” web repository to distribute the input transformation plug-ins. Users may access the repository (such as under a subscription, per-access, or other business model), and browse plug-ins created by developers and/or other users much as one currently browses online music download venues. Plug-in modules may be also offered (e.g., for purchase, as an incentive, free download, or other consideration model) via the repository in an online “app” store model. Other related content such as user-created media (e.g., a code and/or a description outlining the input transformation methodology) may available through the repository, and social forums and links.
[0119] FIG. 9 illustrates one exemplary realization of a computerized system for distributing application packages (e.g., plug-ins). The system 900 may comprise a cloud server depository 906. In FIG. 9 , one or more remote user devices 904 may connect via a remote link 908 to the depository 906 in order to save, load, and/or update their neural network configuration, and/or other content. Such content may include without limitation, media related to the processing data using neuron networks, collected sensor data, wiki entries on training techniques/experiences, forum posts, instructional videos, etc.), network state images, connectivity maps, third-party/homebrew modifications, and/or other media. Users may also form user groups to collaborate on projects, or focus on specific topics, or even on the collective formation of a brain image (somewhat akin to extant distributed gaming interaction). In some implementations, user may also cross-link to groups and content on third-party social media websites (e.g. Facebook®, Twitter®, etc.).
[0120] In one or more implementations, the link 908 may comprise a wired network (Ethernet, DOCSIS modem, T1, DSL), wireless (e.g. Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, infrared, radio, cellular, millimeter wave, satellite), or other link such as a serial link (USB, FireWire, Thunderbolt, etc.). One or more computerized devices 902 may communicate with the cloud server depository 906 via link 912. The computerized devices may correspond for instance to a developer's computer apparatus and/or systems. Developers may utilize the server 906 to store their application packages. In some implementations, the server 906 may enable a direct or indirect connection between the developer 902 and user 904 device in order to install the application package, troubleshoot user's network operation, an/or perform other actions. In one or more implementations, links 912 and/or 908 may comprise an internet connection, etc. effectuated via any of the applicable wired and/or wireless technologies (e.g., Ethernet, WiFi, LTE, CDMA, GSM, etc).
[0121] In some implementations, a virtual “storefront” may be provided as a user interface to the cloud. From the storefront, users may access purchasable content (e.g. plug-ins, source code, technical description and/or firmware packages). Purchasable content allows users to conveniently obtain quality content to enhance their user experience; the quality may be controlled under any number of different mechanisms, such as e.g., peer review, user rating systems, functionality testing before the image is uploadable or made accessible.
[0122] The cloud may act as an intermediary that may link plug-ins with tasks, and users with plug-ins to facilitate use of neuron networks for signal processing. For example, a user of a network characterized by dense connectivity (e.g., neurons with thousands of synapses) may have difficulty performing certain task. A developer may have an application well suited for the task, but he does not have access to individual networks/users. A cloud service may notify the user about the relevant images suited to the task. In some implementations, the users may request assistance with the task. In various implementations, the cloud server may be configured to identify users using networks for specific tasks (via one or more monitoring functions), and alert users that help may be available. The notification may be based on one or more parameters, including for example the hardware/software configuration of the network, types of inputs, connectivity mapping, geographical location (e.g. proximity of user to developer), keywords, or other parameters.
[0123] A subscription model may also or alternatively be used. In various implementations, a user may gain access to content based on a periodic payment or other remuneration paid to the administrator of the networked service, or their designated proxy/agent. A hybrid model may also be used. In one such variant, an initial/periodic subscription fee allows access to general material, but premium content requires a specific (additional) payment.
[0124] Other users that develop skill in training, or those that develop popular brain images, may wish to monetize their creations. The exemplary storefront implementation provides a platform for such enterprise. Operators of storefronts may desire to encourage such enterprise both for revenue generation, and/or for enhanced user experience. Thus, consistent with the present disclosure, the storefront operator may institute competitions with prizes for the most popular/optimized application packages, modifications, and/or media. Consequently, users may be motivated to create higher quality content. Alternatively, the operator may also (in or in lieu of a contest) instate a system of revenue and/or profit sharing for purchasable content. Thus, hobbyists and casual developers may see a reasonable return on their efforts. Such a system may also attract professional developers. Users as a whole may benefit from a wider array of content offerings from more skilled developers. Further, such revenue or profit sharing may be complemented or replaced with a system of internal credits for developers. Thus, contributors have expanded access to paid or otherwise limited distribution materials.
[0125] In various implementations, the cloud model may offer access to competing provider systems of application packages. A user may be able to reprogram/reconfigure the software elements of the system to connect to different management systems. Thus, competing application provision systems may spur innovation. For example, application provision systems may offer users more comprehensive packages ensuring access to applications optimized for a wide variety of tasks to attract users to their particular provision network, and (potentially) expand their revenue base.
[0126] The principles described herein may also be combined with other mechanisms of data encoding in neural networks, such as those described in co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/152,084 entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR PULSE-CODE INVARIANT OBJECT RECOGNITION”, filed Jun. 2, 2011, and co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/152,119, entitled “SENSORY INPUT PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHODS”, filed Jun. 2, 2011, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,942,466 on Jan. 27, 2015, and co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/152,105, filed on Jun. 2, 2011, and entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR TEMPORALLY PROXIMATE OBJECT RECOGNITION”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,122,994 on Sep. 1, 2015, incorporated supra.
[0127] Advantageously, exemplary implementations of the present innovation may be useful in a variety of applications including, without limitation, video prosthetics, autonomous and robotic apparatus, and other electromechanical devices requiring video processing functionality. Examples of such robotic devises are manufacturing robots (e.g., automotive), military, medical (e.g. processing of microscopy, x-ray, ultrasonography, tomography). Examples of autonomous vehicles include rovers, unmanned air vehicles, underwater vehicles, smart appliances (e.g. ROOMBA®), etc.
[0128] Implementations of the principles of the disclosure are applicable to video data processing (e.g., compression) in a wide variety of stationary and portable video devices, such as, for example, smart phones, portable communication devices, notebook, netbook and tablet computers, surveillance camera systems, and practically any other computerized device configured to process vision data
[0129] Implementations of the principles of the disclosure are further applicable to a wide assortment of applications including computer human interaction (e.g., recognition of gestures, voice, posture, face, etc.), controlling processes (e.g., an industrial robot, autonomous and other vehicles), augmented reality applications, organization of information (e.g., for indexing databases of images and image sequences), access control (e.g., opening a door based on a gesture, opening an access way based on detection of an authorized person), detecting events (e.g., for visual surveillance or people or animal counting, tracking), data input, financial transactions (payment processing based on recognition of a person or a special payment symbol) and many others.
[0130] Advantageously, various of the teachings of the disclosure can be used to simplify tasks related to motion estimation, such as where an image sequence is processed to produce an estimate of the object position and velocity (either at each point in the image or in the 3D scene, or even of the camera that produces the images). Examples of such tasks include ego motion, i.e., determining the three-dimensional rigid motion (rotation and translation) of the camera from an image sequence produced by the camera, and following the movements of a set of interest points or objects (e.g., vehicles or humans) in the image sequence and with respect to the image plane.
[0131] In another approach, portions of the object recognition system are embodied in a remote server, comprising a computer readable apparatus storing computer executable instructions configured to perform pattern recognition in data streams for various applications, such as scientific, geophysical exploration, surveillance, navigation, data mining (e.g., content-based image retrieval). Myriad other applications exist that will be recognized by those of ordinary skill given the present disclosure.
[0132] Although the system(s) and/or method(s) of this disclosure have been described in detail for the purpose of illustration based on what is currently considered to be the most practical and preferred implementations, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that the disclosure is not limited to the disclosed implementations, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover modifications and equivalent arrangements that are within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, it is to be understood that the present disclosure contemplates that, to the extent possible, one or more features of any implementation can be combined with one or more features of any other implementation.
Claims
What is claimed:
1. An electronic device having computerized logic, the computerized logic configured to be placed in operation with a network node of a network in order to:
evaluate a value of an input into the network node;
when the evaluation indicates that the input value is above a threshold, generate a scaled input using a concave function of the input; and
when the evaluation indicates that the input value is not above the threshold, generate a bypass input;
wherein the scaled input is characterized by a magnitude that is lower than a magnitude of the input value.
2. The device of claim 1, wherein the generation of the scaled input is configured to increase stability of the network, the stability increase characterized by an increased sensitivity of the network to sparse inputs.
3. The device of claim 1, wherein the generation of the scaled input is configured to increase stability of the network, the stability increase characterized by a reduced pathological synchronized activity within the network.
4. A computer readable apparatus having a non-transitory storage medium with at least one computer program stored thereon, the at least one computer program configured to, when executed:
generate a transformed input of a plurality of spiking inputs of a neuron of a spiking neuron network; and
communicate the transformed input to the neuron;
wherein:
the generation of the transformed input is configured to cause the neuron to encode an input within an expanded range into a latency of a spike output, the expanded range characterized by greater span of input values compared to an input range of the neuron in an absence of a transformation.
5. The computer readable apparatus of claim 4, wherein:
the at least one computer program is further configured to be downloaded from a repository over an operative data link.
6. The computer readable apparatus of claim 5, wherein:
the operative data link comprises one or more of a wireless local area network (WLAN) link and a personal area network (PAN) link.
7. The computer readable apparatus of claim 5, wherein:
the repository comprises a cloud-based entity; and
the download is effected via the operative data link between a user computer and the cloud-based entity;
the operative data link is configured based on an authentication process, the authentication process configured based on at least one of (i) an identity of a user; and (ii) an identity of the user computer.
8. The computer readable apparatus of claim 5, wherein:
a session is established based at least on a payment transaction to an entity associated with the repository, the transaction based on one or more of a subscription, a pay-per-use, a one-time payment, or a rent payment model.
9. A method of adapting an extant logical network to provide a desired functionality, the method comprising:
placing a logical entity in communication with a node;
where the logical entity is configured to process a plurality of inputs for the node of the extant logical network;
receiving one or more inputs of the plurality of inputs; and
causing the extant logical network to operate in accordance with the desired functionality based at least on a transformation of the one or more inputs by the logical entity;
wherein the rule is effectuated based at least on an evaluation of a value of individual ones of the one or more inputs by the logical entity; and
wherein the logical entity is configured such that:
when the evaluation indicates that the value is within a range, the transformation produces an output equal to the value; and
when the evaluation indicates that the value is outside the range, the transformation produces an output different from the value.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein:
the range is characterized by a lower bound and an upper bound; and
the logical entity is configured such that, when the evaluation indicates the value is below the lower bound, the transformation produces an output greater than the value.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the logical entity is configured such that, when the evaluation indicates the value being above the upper bound, the transformation produces an output smaller than the value.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein:
the desired functionality is characterized by a response generated by the node, the response having a first latency associated therewith;
the first latency falls within a first latency range configured based on the transformation of the one or more inputs; and
a second latency based on the received one or more inputs is characterized by a second latency range, the second range being narrower than the first range.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein:
the transformation comprises a concave function applied to individual ones of the one or more inputs; and
the first latency is configured based on a combination of transformed ones of the one or more inputs.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the combination comprises a linear combination.
15. The method of claim 12, wherein:
the transformation comprises a concave function applied to a combination of the one or more inputs; and
the first latency is configured based on the transformation of the combination.
16. The method of claim 9, wherein:
individual ones of the plurality of inputs are received by the node via a plurality of connections;
individual ones of the plurality of connections are characterized by an efficacy configured to advance or delay a time of the response generation; and
the efficacy of a given one of the plurality of connections is configured to be adjusted based on a time interval between the time of the response generation and a time of an input of the plurality of inputs associated with the given connection.
17. The method of claim 9, wherein:
the plurality of inputs comprise a first value, and a second value configured larger than the first value; and
the transformation comprises a concave function of the input, configured to increase the first value to produce a third value and to decrease the second value to produce a fourth value.
18. The method of claim 9, further comprising:
updating a state of the node based on at least a combination of the transformed one or more inputs, the updating configured to cause the node to generate a response based on at least the updated state of the node breaching a threshold;
wherein:
the node state is configured in accordance with a dynamic process configured to be updated at a plurality of time intervals;
a combination of the transformed inputs is configured to produce a combined input associated with a given update interval of the plurality of time intervals;
the node state is configured based on the combined input and at least one other combined input obtained during another update interval of the plurality of time intervals prior to the given update interval, the at least one other combined input configured based on the combination of other scaled inputs received by the node prior to the another update interval.
19. The method of claim 18, further comprising:
decaying the combined input in accordance with a decay process, the decaying configured to reduce a contribution of the combined input for use by a subsequent update of the plurality of updates.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the decay process is selected from a group consisting of: an exponential decay characterized by an exponent, a linear decay process characterized by an average rate, a geometric decay, and a polynomial decay.
Patent Citations (254)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4468617(A) | 1984-08-01 | Ringwall | Applicant |
| US4852018(A) | 1989-07-01 | Grossberg et al. | Applicant |
| US5063603(A) | 1991-11-01 | Burt | Applicant |
| US5092343(A) | 1992-03-01 | Spitzer et al. | Applicant |
| US5138447(A) | 1992-08-01 | Shen et al. | Applicant |
| US5216752(A) | 1993-06-01 | Tam | Applicant |
| US5216757(A) | 1993-06-01 | Dorkin | Applicant |
| US5245672(A) | 1993-09-01 | Wilson et al. | Applicant |
| US5271535(A) | 1993-12-01 | Fridman et al. | Applicant |
| US5272535(A) | 1993-12-01 | Elabd | Applicant |
| US5355435(A) | 1994-10-01 | Deyong et al. | Applicant |
| US5388186(A) | 1995-02-01 | Bose | Applicant |
| US5408588(A) | 1995-04-01 | Ulug | Applicant |
| US5467428(A) | 1995-11-01 | Ulug | Applicant |
| US5579440(A) | 1996-11-01 | Brown | Applicant |
| US5638359(A) | 1997-06-01 | Peltola et al. | Applicant |
| US5652594(A) | 1997-07-01 | Costas | Applicant |
| US5673367(A) | 1997-09-01 | Buckley | Applicant |
| US5719480(A) | 1998-02-01 | Bock et al. | Applicant |
| US5841959(A) | 1998-11-01 | Guiremand | Applicant |
| US5875108(A) | 1999-02-01 | Hoffberg et al. | Applicant |
| US5997539(A) | 1999-12-01 | Errico et al. | Applicant |
| US6009418(A) | 1999-12-01 | Cooper | Applicant |
| US6014653(A) | 2000-01-01 | Thaler | Applicant |
| US6035389(A) | 2000-03-01 | Grochowski et al. | Applicant |
| US6169981(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Werbos | Applicant |
| US6363369(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Liaw et al. | Applicant |
| US6366293(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Hamilton et al. | Applicant |
| US6418424(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Hoffberg et al. | Applicant |
| US6442451(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Lapham | Applicant |
| US6458157(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Suaning | Applicant |
| US6489741(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Genov et al. | Applicant |
| US6509854(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Morita et al. | Applicant |
| US6532454(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Werbos | Applicant |
| US6545705(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Sigel et al. | Applicant |
| US6545708(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Tamayama et al. | Applicant |
| US6546291(B2) | 2003-04-01 | Merfeld et al. | Applicant |
| US6581046(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Ahissar | Applicant |
| US6601049(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Cooper | Applicant |
| US6625317(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Gaffin et al. | Applicant |
| US6636781(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Shen et al. | Applicant |
| US6643627(B2) | 2003-11-01 | Liaw et al. | Applicant |
| US6697711(B2) | 2004-02-01 | Yokono et al. | Applicant |
| US6917925(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Berenji et al. | Applicant |
| US7002585(B1) | 2006-02-01 | Watanabe et al. | Applicant |
| US7024276(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Ito | Applicant |
| US7054850(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Matsugu | Applicant |
| US7324870(B2) | 2008-01-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US7342589(B2) | 2008-03-01 | Miserocchi | Applicant |
| US7395251(B2) | 2008-07-01 | Linsker | Applicant |
| US7426501(B2) | 2008-09-01 | Nugent | Applicant |
| US7426920(B1) | 2008-09-01 | Petersen | Applicant |
| US7565203(B2) | 2009-07-01 | Greenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US7580907(B1) | 2009-08-01 | Rhodes | Applicant |
| US7639886(B1) | 2009-12-01 | Rastogi | Applicant |
| US7653255(B2) | 2010-01-01 | Rastogi | Applicant |
| US7668605(B2) | 2010-02-01 | Braun et al. | Applicant |
| US7672920(B2) | 2010-03-01 | Ito et al. | Applicant |
| US7737933(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Yamano et al. | Applicant |
| US7752544(B2) | 2010-07-01 | Cheng et al. | Applicant |
| US7765029(B2) | 2010-07-01 | Fleischer et al. | Applicant |
| US7849030(B2) | 2010-12-01 | Ellingsworth | Applicant |
| US8000967(B2) | 2011-08-01 | Taleb | Applicant |
| US8015130(B2) | 2011-09-01 | Matsugu et al. | Applicant |
| US8103602(B2) | 2012-01-01 | Izhikevich | Applicant |
| US8154436(B2) | 2012-04-01 | Szajnowski | Applicant |
| US8160354(B2) | 2012-04-01 | Paquier | Applicant |
| US8200593(B2) | 2012-06-01 | Guillen et al. | Applicant |
| US8281997(B2) | 2012-10-01 | Moran et al. | Applicant |
| US8311965(B2) | 2012-11-01 | Breitwisch et al. | Applicant |
| US8315305(B2) | 2012-11-01 | Petre et al. | Applicant |
| US8346692(B2) | 2013-01-01 | Rouat et al. | Applicant |
| US8390707(B2) | 2013-03-01 | Yamashita | Applicant |
| US8416847(B2) | 2013-04-01 | Roman | Applicant |
| US8467623(B2) | 2013-06-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US8515160(B1) | 2013-08-01 | Khosla et al. | Applicant |
| US8583286(B2) | 2013-11-01 | Fleischer et al. | Applicant |
| US8655815(B2) | 2014-02-01 | Palmer et al. | Applicant |
| US8712939(B2) | 2014-04-01 | Szatmary et al. | Applicant |
| US8712941(B2) | 2014-04-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US8719199(B2) | 2014-05-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US8725658(B2) | 2014-05-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US8725662(B2) | 2014-05-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US8751042(B2) | 2014-06-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US8756183(B1) | 2014-06-01 | Daily et al. | Applicant |
| US8775341(B1) | 2014-07-01 | Commons | Applicant |
| US8793205(B1) | 2014-07-01 | Fisher et al. | Applicant |
| US8817094(B1) | 2014-08-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US8943008(B2) | 2015-01-01 | Ponulak et al. | Applicant |
| US8972315(B2) | 2015-03-01 | Szatmary et al. | Applicant |
| US8977582(B2) | 2015-03-01 | Richert | Applicant |
| US8983216(B2) | 2015-03-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US8990133(B1) | 2015-03-01 | Ponulak et al. | Applicant |
| US8996177(B2) | 2015-03-01 | Coenen | Applicant |
| US2002/0038294(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Matsugu | Applicant |
| US2002/0169733(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Peters et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0023347(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Konno et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0050903(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Liaw et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0216919(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Roushar | Applicant |
| US2003/0222987(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Karazuba | Applicant |
| US2004/0051493(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Furuta et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0054964(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Bozdagi et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0064609(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Sanma et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0066363(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Yamano et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0136439(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Dewberry et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0170330(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Fogg et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0193670(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Langan et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0220082(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Surmeier et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0004710(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Shimomura et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0015351(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Nugent | Applicant |
| US2005/0036649(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Yokono et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0065651(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Ayers et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0096539(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Leibig et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0261803(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Seth et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0271289(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Rastogi | Applicant |
| US2005/0283450(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Matsugu et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0094001(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Torre et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0129728(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Hampel | Applicant |
| US2006/0161218(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Danilov | Applicant |
| US2007/0022068(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Linsker | Applicant |
| US2007/0176643(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Nugent | Applicant |
| US2007/0208678(A1) | 2007-09-01 | Matsugu | Applicant |
| US2007/0260356(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Kock et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0024345(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Watson | Applicant |
| US2008/0097644(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Kaznov et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0100482(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Lazar | Applicant |
| US2008/0133052(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0154428(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Nagatsuka et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0162391(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Izhikevich | Applicant |
| US2008/0174700(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Takaba | Applicant |
| US2008/0199072(A1) | 2008-08-01 | Kondo et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0201282(A1) | 2008-08-01 | Garcia et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0237446(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Oshikubo et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0316362(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Qiu et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0043722(A1) | 2009-02-01 | Nugent | Applicant |
| US2009/0043777(A1) | 2009-02-01 | Wyler et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0234501(A1) | 2009-09-01 | Ishizaki | Applicant |
| US2009/0287624(A1) | 2009-11-01 | Rouat et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0036457(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Sarpeshkar et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0081958(A1) | 2010-04-01 | She | Applicant |
| US2010/0086171(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Lapstun | Applicant |
| US2010/0100482(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Hardt | Applicant |
| US2010/0119214(A1) | 2010-05-01 | Shimazaki et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0166320(A1) | 2010-07-01 | Paquier | Applicant |
| US2010/0169098(A1) | 2010-07-01 | Patch | Applicant |
| US2010/0198765(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Fiorillo | Applicant |
| US2010/0222924(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Gienger et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0225824(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Lazar et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0235310(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Gage et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0286824(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Solomon | Applicant |
| US2010/0299101(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Shimada et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0299296(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Modha et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0016071(A1) | 2011-01-01 | Guillen et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0035052(A1) | 2011-02-01 | Mclurkin et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0119214(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Breitwisch et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0119215(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Elmegreen et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0134242(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Loubser et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0137843(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Poon et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0144802(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Jang | Applicant |
| US2011/0160741(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Asano et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0184556(A1) | 2011-07-01 | Seth et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0196199(A1) | 2011-08-01 | Donhowe et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0206122(A1) | 2011-08-01 | Lu et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0231016(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Goulding | Applicant |
| US2011/0235698(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Petre et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0296944(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Carter et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0011090(A1) | 2012-01-01 | Tang et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0011093(A1) | 2012-01-01 | Aparin et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0036099(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Venkatraman et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0053728(A1) | 2012-03-01 | Theodorus et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0083982(A1) | 2012-04-01 | Bonefas et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0084240(A1) | 2012-04-01 | Esser et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0109863(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Esser et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0109866(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Modha | Applicant |
| US2012/0117012(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Szatmary et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0143495(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Dantu | Applicant |
| US2012/0150781(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Arthur et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0173021(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Tsusaka | Applicant |
| US2012/0197439(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0209428(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Mizutani | Applicant |
| US2012/0209432(A1) | 2012-08-01 | Fleischer et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0303091(A1) | 2012-11-01 | Izhikevich | Applicant |
| US2012/0308076(A1) | 2012-12-01 | Piekniewski et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0308136(A1) | 2012-12-01 | Izhikevich | Applicant |
| US2012/0330872(A1) | 2012-12-01 | Esser et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0019325(A1) | 2013-01-01 | Deisseroth et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0046716(A1) | 2013-02-01 | Chan et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0066468(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Choi et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0073080(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Ponulak | Applicant |
| US2013/0073484(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0073491(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0073492(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0073493(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Modha | Applicant |
| US2013/0073495(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0073496(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Szatmary et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0073498(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0073499(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0073500(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Szatmary | Examiner |
| US2013/0096719(A1) | 2013-04-01 | Sanders et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0103626(A1) | 2013-04-01 | Hunzinger | Applicant |
| US2013/0116827(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Inazumi | Applicant |
| US2013/0117212(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Hunzinger et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0151448(A1) | 2013-06-01 | Ponulak | Applicant |
| US2013/0151449(A1) | 2013-06-01 | Ponulak | Applicant |
| US2013/0151450(A1) | 2013-06-01 | Ponulak | Applicant |
| US2013/0204814(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Hunzinger et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0204820(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Hunzinger et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0218821(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Szatmary et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0251278(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0297539(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Piekniewski et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0297541(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Piekniewski et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0297542(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Piekniewski et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0304683(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Lo | Examiner |
| US2013/0325244(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0325766(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Petre et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0325768(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Sinyavskiy et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0325773(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Sinyavskiy et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0325774(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Sinyavskiy et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0325775(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Sinyavskiy et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0325776(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Ponulak et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0325777(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Petre et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0012788(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Piekniewski | Applicant |
| US2014/0016858(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Richert | Applicant |
| US2014/0025613(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Ponulak | Applicant |
| US2014/0027718(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Zhao | Applicant |
| US2014/0032458(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Sinyavskiy et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0032459(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Sinyavskiy et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0052679(A1) | 2014-02-01 | Sinyavskiy et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0064609(A1) | 2014-03-01 | Petre et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0081895(A1) | 2014-03-01 | Coenen et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0089232(A1) | 2014-03-01 | Buibas et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0122397(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Richert et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0122398(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Richert | Applicant |
| US2014/0122399(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Szatmary et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0122400(A1) | 2014-05-01 | Szatmary et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0156574(A1) | 2014-06-01 | Piekniewski et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0193066(A1) | 2014-07-01 | Richert | Applicant |
| US2014/0222739(A1) | 2014-08-01 | Ponulak | Applicant |
| US2014/0244557(A1) | 2014-08-01 | Piekniewski et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0277718(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Izhikevich et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0310220(A1) | 2014-10-01 | Chang et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0379623(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Piekniewski | Applicant |
| US2015/0005937(A1) | 2015-01-01 | Ponulak | Applicant |
| US2015/0120626(A1) | 2015-04-01 | Gupta et al. | Applicant |
| CN102226740(A) | 2011-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1089436(A2) | 2001-04-01 | Applicant | |
| JPH0487423(A) | 1992-03-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2003175480(A) | 2003-06-01 | Applicant | |
| RU2108612(C1) | 1998-04-01 | Applicant | |
| RU2406105(C2) | 2010-12-01 | Applicant | |
| RU2424561(C2) | 2011-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2008083335(A2) | 2008-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2008132066(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2010136961(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (237)
- A Neural Network for Ego-motion Estimation from Optical Flow, by Branka, Published 1995.Applicant
- Abbott L. F. and Nelson S.B. (2000), “Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast”, Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1178-1183.Applicant
- Aleksandrov (1968), Stochastic optimization, Engineering Cybernetics, 5, 11-16.Applicant
- Alexandros <g class=“gr—gr—3 gr-alert gr—spell ContextualSpelling ins-del multiReplace” id=“3” data-gr-id=“3”>Bouganis</g> and Murray Shanahan, “Training a Spiking Neural Network to Control a 4-DoF Robotic Arm based on Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity”, Proceedings of WCCI 2010 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, COB, Barcelona, Spain, Jul. 18-23, 2010, pp. 4104-4111.Applicant
- Alvarez, “Review of Approximation Techniques,” PhD thesis, chapter 2, pp. 7-14, University of Bradford, 2000.Applicant
- Amari (1998), Why natural gradient?, Acoustics. Speech and Signal Processing, (pp. 1213-1216). Seattle, WA, USA.Applicant
- Asesio et al., “Robot Learning Control Based on Neural Network Prediction” ASME 8th Annual Dynamic Systems and Control Conference joint with the JSME 11th Motion and Vibration Conference 2012 [Retrieved on: Jun. 24, 2014]. Retrieved fro internet:<http://msc.berkeley.edu/wjchen/publications/DSC12.sub.--8726.sub.--FI-.pdf>.Applicant
- Baras, D. et al. “Reinforcement learning, spike-time-dependent plasticity, and the BCM rule,” Neural Computation vol. 19 No. 8 (2007): pp. 2245-2279.Applicant
- Bartlett et al., (2000) “A Biologically Plausible and Locally Optimal Learning Algorithm for Spiking Neurons” Retrieved from http://arp.anu.edu.au/ftp/papers/ jon/brains,pdf.Applicant
- Bartlett et al., “Convexity, Classification, and Risk Bounds” Jun. 16, 2005, pp. 1-61.Applicant
- Bartlett., et al., “Large Margin Classifiers: Convex Loss, Low Noise, and Convergence Rates,” Dec. 8, 2003, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Baxter et al., (2000), Direct gradient-based reinforcement learning, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, (pp. III-271-III-274).Applicant
- Bennett, M.R., (1999), The early history of the synapse: from Plato to Sherrington. Brain Res. Boll., 50(2): 95-118.Applicant
- Berkes and Wiskott. Slow feature analysis yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. Journal of Vision (2005) vol. 5 (6).Applicant
- Bertsekas, Dimitri P., and Dimitri P. Bertsekas. Dynamic programming and optimal control. vol. 1. No. 2. Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific, 1995.Applicant
- Bertsekas, Dimitri P., “Approximate dynamic programming.” (2011).Applicant
- Blais B.S., et al., “BCM Theory,” Scholarpedia, 2008, vol. 3 (3), 13 pages.Applicant
- Bohte et al., (2000), Spike Prop: backpropagation for networks of spiking neurons, in Proceedings of ESANN'2000, (pp. 419-424).Applicant
- Bohte et al., “A Computational Theory of Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity: Achieving Robust Neural Responses via Conditional Entropy Minimization” 2004.Applicant
- Bohte, ‘Spiking Nueral Networks’ Doctorate at the University of Leiden, Holland, Mar. 5, 2003, pp. 1-133 [retrieved on Nov. 14, 2012]. Retrieved from the internet: <URL: http://holnepagcs ,cwi ,n11- sbolltedmblicabond)hdthesislxif>.Applicant
- Booij(2005). A Gradient Descent Rule for Spiking Neurons Emitting Multiple Spikes. Information Processing Letters n. 6. v.95 , 552-558.Applicant
- Breiman et al., “Random Forests” 33pgs, Jan. 2001.Applicant
- Brette et al., Brian: a simple and flexible simulator for spiking neural networks, The Neuromorphic Engineer, Jul. 1, 2009, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.2417/1200906.1659.Applicant
- Brette, et al., “Simulation of Networks of Spiking Neurons: A Review of Tools and Strategies”, Received Nov. 29, 2006, Revised Apr. 2, 2007, Accepted Apr. 12, 2007, Springer Science, 50 pages.Applicant
- Brette, et al., “Simulation ofNetworks of Spiking Neurons: A Review of Tools and Strategies”, Received Jan. 29, 2006, Revised Apr. 2, 2007, Accepted Apr. 12, 2007, Springer Science, 50 pages.Applicant
- Capel, “Random Forests and ferns” LPAC, Jan. 1, 2012, 40 pgs.Applicant
- Cessac et al. ‘Overview of facts and issues about neural coding by spikes.’ Journal of Physiology, Paris 104.1 (2010): 5.Applicant
- Chistiakova, Marina, and Maxim Volgushev. “Heterosynaptic plasticity in the neocortex.” Experimental brain research 199.3-4 (2009): 377-390.Applicant
- Christo Panchev, “Temporal Processing in a Spiking Model of the Visual System”, S. Kollias et al. (Eds.): ICANN 2006, Part 1, LNCS 4131, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006, pp. 750-759.Applicant
- Competitive behaviors of a spiking neural network with spike timing dependent plasticity, Chengmei Ruan ; Qingxiang Wu ; Lijuan Fan ; Zhigiang Zhuo ; Xiaowei Wang, Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), 2012 5th International Conference on DOI: 10.1109/BMEI.2012.6513088 Publication Year: 2012 , pp. 1015-1019.Applicant
- Computation of Optical Flow Using a Neural Network, by Zhou, Published 1988.Applicant
- Cuntz et al., ‘One Rule to Grow Them All: A General Theory of Neuronal Branching and Its Paractical Application’ PLOS Computational Biology, 6 (8), Published Aug. 5, 2010.Applicant
- Dan Y., et al., “Spike Timing-dependent Plasticity of Neural Circuits,” Neuron, 2004, vol. 44 (1), pp. 23-30.Applicant
- Daniel Bush, “STDP, Rate-coded Hebbian Learning and Auto-Associative Network Models of the Hippocampus”, Sep. 2008, University of Sussex, pp. 1-109.Applicant
- Davison et al., PyNN: a common interface for neuronal network simulators, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, Jan. 2009, pp. 1-10, vol. 2, Article 11.Applicant
- de Queiroz, M. et al. “Reinforcement learning of a simple control task using the spike response model.” Neurocomputing vol. 70 No. 1 (2006): pp. 14-20.Applicant
- Djurfeldt, Mikael, The Connection-set Algebra: a formalism for the representation of connectivity structure in neuronal network models, implementations in Python and C++, and their use in simulators BMC Neuroscience Jul. 18, 2011 p. 1 12(Suppl 1):P80.Applicant
- Dorval et al. ‘Probability distributions of the logarithm of inter-spike intervals yield accurate entropy estimates from small datasets.’ Journal of neuroscience methods 173.1 (2008): 129.Applicant
- El-Laithy (2011), A reinforcement learning framework for spiking networks with dynamic synapses, Comput Intell Neurosci.Applicant
- Fall Detection Using Modular Neural Networks with Back-projected Optical Flow, by Huang, Published 2007.Applicant
- Fidjeland, et al., “Accelerated Simulation of Spiking Neural Networks Using GPUs,” WCCI 2010 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligience, Jul. 18-23, 2010—CCIB, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 536-543, [retrieved on Nov. 14, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.doc.ic.ac.ukl-mpsha/IJCNN10b.pdf.Applicant
- Field, G.; Chichilnisky, E, Information Processing in the Primate Retina: Circuitry and Coding. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2007, 30(1), 1-30.Applicant
- Fiete, et al, Spike-Time-Dependent Plasticity and Heterosynaptic Competition Organize Networks to Produce Long Scale-Free Sequences of Neural Activity. Neuron 65, Feb. 25, 2010, pp. 563-576.Applicant
- Fletcher (1987), Practical methods of optimization, New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.Applicant
- Floreano et al., ‘Neuroevolution: from architectures to learning’ Evol. Intel. Jan. 2008 1:47-62, [retrieved Dec. 30, 2013] [retrieved online from URL:http://inforscienee.eptl.cb/record/112676/files/FloreanoDuerrMattiussi2008.pdf<http: />.Applicant
- Florian (2005), A reinforcement learning algorithm for spiking neural networks SYNASC '05 Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing.Applicant
- Florian03, Biologically Inspired Neural Networks for the Control of Embodied Agents, Technical Report Coneural-03-03 Version 1.0 [online], Nov. 30, 2003 [retrieved on Nov. 24, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.216.4931-&rep1&type=pdf>.Applicant
- Foldiak, P. Learning invariance from transformation sequences. Neural Computation, 1991, 3(2), 194-200.Applicant
- Fremaux. N et al., “Functional Requirements for Reward-Modulated Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity”, The Journal of Neuroscience, Oct. 6, 2010, 30 (40):13326-13337.Applicant
- Froemke et al., Temporal modulation of spike-timing-dependent plasticity, Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, vol. 2, Article 19, pp. 1-16 [online] Jun. 2010 [retrieved on Dec. 16, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <frontiersin.org />.Applicant
- Fu (2005) Stochastic Gradient Estimation, Technical Research Report.Applicant
- Fu (2008), What You Should Know About Simulation and Derivatives Naval Research Logistics, vol. 55, No. 8 , 723-736.Applicant
- Fyfe et al., (2007), Reinforcement Learning Reward Functions for Unsupervised Learning, ISNN '07 Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Neural Networks: Advances in Neural Networks.Applicant
- Gerstner (2002), Spiking neuron models: single neurons, populations, plasticity, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Applicant
- Gerstner et al. (1996) A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding. Nature vol. 383 (6595) pp. 76-78.Applicant
- Gewaltig et al.. ‘NEST (Neural Simulation Tool)’, Scholarpedia, 2007. pp. I-15. 2(4): 1430, doi: 1 0.4249/scholarpedia.1430.Applicant
- Glackin, C. et al., Feature Extraction from Spectra-temporal Signals using Dynamic Synapses, recurrency, and lateral inhibition, Neural Networks (IJCNN), The 2010 International Joint Conference on DOI: 10.1109/IJCNN.2010.5596818 Publication Year: 2010, pp. 1-6.Applicant
- Glackin C., et al., “Feature Extraction from Spectro-Temporal Signals using Dynamic Synapses, Recurrency, and Lateral Inhibition,” Neural Networks (IJCNN), The 2010 International Joint Conference on , 2010, pp. 1-6.Applicant
- Glackin C., et al., “Feature Extraction from Spectro-temporal Signals Using Dynamic Synapses, Recurrency, and Lateral Inhibition,” The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2010, pp. 1-6.Applicant
- Gleeson et al., NeuroML: A Language for Describing Data Driven Models of Neurons and Networks with a High Degree of Biological Detail, PLoS Computational Biology, Jun. 2010, pp. 1-19 vol. 6 Issue 6.Applicant
- Gluck, Stimulus Generalization and Representation in Adaptive Network Models of Category Learning [online], 1991 [retrieved on Aug. 24, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet:<URL:http:// www.google.coinlurl ?sa—t&rct—j&q—Giuck+ 4)/022STIMULUS+GENERALIZATION+AND+REPRESENTATIO N+1N +Adaptive+NETWORK+MODELS±0F+CATEGORY+LEARN I Ng%22+1991.Applicant
- Glynn (1995), Likelihood ratio gradient estimation for regenerative stochastic recursion Advances in Applied Probability 27.4. 1019-1053.Applicant
- Gollisch et al., ‘Rapid neural coding in the retina with relative spike latencies.’ Science 319.5866 (2008): 1108-1111.Applicant
- Goodman et al., Brian: a simulator for spiking neural networks in Python, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, Nov. 2008, pp. 1-10, vol. 2, Article 5.Applicant
- Gorchetchnikov et al., NineML: declarative, mathematically-explicit descriptions of spiking neuronal networks, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, Conference Abstract: 4th INCF Congress of Neuroinformatics, doi: 1 0.3389/conffninf.2011.08.00098.Applicant
- Govindhasamy, James J., Sean F. McLoone, and George W. Irwin. “Sequential learning for adaptive critic design: an industrial control application.” Machine Learning for Signal Processing, 2005 IEEE Workshop on. IEEE, 2005.Applicant
- Graham, Lyle J., The Surf-Hippo Reference Manual, http://www.neurophys.biomedicale.univparis5. fr/graham/surf-hippo-files/Surf-Hippo%20Reference%20Manual.pdf, Mar. 2002. pp. 1-128.Applicant
- Grollman., et al., “Dogged Learning for Robots,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2007.Applicant
- Hagras, Hani, et al., “Evolving Spiking Neural Network Controllers for Autonomous Robots”, IEEE 2004.Applicant
- Hanselmann T., et al., “Continuous-time Adaptive Critics,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2007, vol. 18 (3), pp. 631-647.Applicant
- Ho, “Random Decision Forests” Int'l Conf. Document Analysis and Recognition, 1995, 5 pgs.Applicant
- Hopfield JJ (1995) Pattern recognition computation using action potential timing for stimulus representation.Nature 376: 33-36.Applicant
- In search of the artificial retina [online]. Vision Systems Design. Apr. 1, 2007.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/039696, mailed on Sep. 6, 2012, 9 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/040560, mailed on Sep. 21, 2012, 8 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/040567, mailed on Sep. 21, 2012, 12 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/040576, mailed on Sep. 21, 2012, 12 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/039985, mailed on Nov. 26, 2013, 11 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/044124, mailed on 12 <g class=“gr—gr—4 gr-alert gr—spell ContextualSpelling ins-del multiReplace” id=“4” data-gr-id=“4” />Sep. 2013, 6 Pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/048512, mailed on 23 <g class=“gr—gr—4 gr-alert gr—spell ContextualSpelling ins-del multiReplace” id=“4” data-gr-id=“4”>Janaury/g> 2015, 9 Pages.Applicant
- International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2013/026738, mailed on Jul. 21, 2014,4 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2014/040407, mailed on Oct. 17, 2014, 2 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report for International Application PCT/US2013/060352 dated Jan. 16, 2014.Applicant
- International Search Report for PCT/US2013/052136 dated Nov. 21, 2013.Applicant
- It, Laurent, and Christof Koch. “Computational modelling of visual attention.” Nature reviews neuroscience 2.3 (2001): 194-203.Applicant
- Izhikevic, F. (2007), Solving the Distal Reward Problem through Linkage of ST DP and Dopamine Signaling, Cerebral Cortex, vol. 17, 2443-2452.Applicant
- Izhikevich E. M, and Hoppensteadt F.C. (2009) Polychronous Wavefront Computations. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 19:1733-1739.Applicant
- Izhikevich E.M. (2004) Which Model to Use for Cortical Spiking Neurons? IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 15:1063-1070.Applicant
- Izhikevich E.M. (2006) Polychronization: Computation With Spikes. Neural Computation, 18:245-282.Applicant
- Izhikevich, E,M. (2007) Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting, The MIT Press, 2007.Applicant
- Izhikevich E.M., “Neural Excitability, Spiking and Bursting”, Neurosciences Institute, Received Jun. 9, 1999, Revised Oct. 25, 1999, 1171-1266, 96 pages.Applicant
- Izhikevich et al., ‘Relating STDP to BCM’, Neural Computation (2003) 15, 1511-1523.Applicant
- Izhikevich, Eugene M., Dynamical systems in neuroscience: chapters 1 and 2, MIT press, 2007.Applicant
- Izhikevich, ‘Simple Model of Spiking Neurons’, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 14, No. 6, Nov. 2003, pp. 1569-1572.Applicant
- Janowitz, M.K.; Van Rossum, M.C.W. Excitability changes that complement Hebbian learning. Network, Computation in Neural Systems, 2006, 17 (1), 31-41.Applicant
- Jin, X., Rest, A., F. Galluppi, F., S. Davies., S., and Furber, S. (2010) “Implementing Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity on SpiNNaker Neuromorphic Hardware”, WCCI 2010, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence.Applicant
- Kaelbling, Leslie Pack, Michael L. Littman, and Andrew W. Moore. “Reinforcement learning: A survey.” arXiv preprint cs/9605103 (1996).Applicant
- Kalal et al. Online learning of robust object detectors during unstable tracking published on 3rd On-line Learning for Computer Vision Workshop 2009, Kyoto, Japan, IEEE CS.Applicant
- Karbowski et al., ‘Multispikes and Synchronization in a Large Neural Network with Temporal Delays’, Neural Computation 12. 1573-1606 (2000).Applicant
- Kasabov, “Evolving Spiking Neural Networks for Spatio-and Spectra-Temporal Pattern Recognition”, IEEE 6th International Conference Intelligent Systems 2012 [Retrieved on Jun. 24, 2014], Retrieved from Internet:<http://ncs.ethz.ch/projects/evospike/publications/evolving-spiking-ne-ural-networks-for-spatio-and-spectro-temporal-pattern-recognition-plenary-- talk-ieee-is>.Applicant
- Kazantsev, et al., “Active Spike Transmission in the Neuron Model With a Winding Threshold Maniford”, 01/03112,205-211,7 pages.Applicant
- Kenji Doya (2000), Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Time and Space, Neural Computation, 12:1. 219-245.Applicant
- Khotanzad. ‘Classification of invariant image representations using a neural network’ IEEE. Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 38, No. 6, Jun. 1990, pp. 1028-1038 [online], [retrieved on Dec. 10, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www-ee.uta.edu/eeweb/IP/Courses/SPR/Reference/ Khotanzad.pdf.Applicant
- Kiefer (1952), Stochastic Estimation of the Maximum of a Regression Function, Annals of Mathematica[ Statistics 23, #3, 462-466.Applicant
- Klampfl (2009), Spiking neurons can learn to solve information bottleneck problems and extract independent components, Neural Computation, 21(4), pp. 911-959.Applicant
- Kleijnen et al., Optimization and sensitivity analysis of computer simulation models by the score function method Invited Review European Journal of Operational Research, Mar. 1995.Applicant
- Kling-Petersen, PhD, “Sun and HPC: From Systems to PetaScale” Sun Microsystems, no date, 31 pages.Applicant
- Klute et al., “Artificial Muscles: Actuators for Biorobotic Systems,” The International Journal Robotics Research, 2002, vol. 21, pp. 295-309.Applicant
- Knoblauch A., et al., “Memory Capacities for Synaptic and Structural Plasticity,” Neural Computation, 2010, vol. 22 (2), pp. 289-341.Applicant
- Knoblauch, et at Memory Capacities for Synaptic and Structural Plasticity, Neural Computation 2009, pp. 1-45.Applicant
- Larochelle et al., (2009), Exploring Strategies for Training Deep Neural Networks, J. of Machine Learning Research, v. 10, pp. 1-40.Applicant
- Lars Buesing, Wolfgang Maass, “Simplified Rules and Theoretical Analysis for Information Bottleneck Optimization and PCA with Spiking Neurons”, NIPS Proceedings, 2007, “http:l/papers.nips.cc/paper/3168-simplified-rules-and-theoretical-analysis-forinformation-bottleneck-optimization-and-pea-with-spiking-neurons”, 2007, pp. 1-8.Applicant
- Laurent, ‘Issue 1—nnql Refactor Nucleus into its own file—Neural Network Query Language’ [retrieved on Nov. 12, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://code.google.com/p/nnql/issues/detail?id=1.Applicant
- Laurent, ‘The Neural Network Query Language (NNQL) Reference’ [retrieved on Nov. 12, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL'https://code.google.com/p/ nnql/issues/detail?id=1>.Applicant
- Lazar et a]. ‘Multichannel time encoding with integrate-and-fire neurons.’ Neurocomputing 65 (2005): 401-407.Applicant
- Lazar et al. ‘A video time encoding machine’, in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '08 2008, pp. 717-720.Applicant
- Lazar., et al., “Consistent recovery of sensory stimuli encoded with MIMO neural circuits,” Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2009.Applicant
- Lazar et al. ‘Consistent recovery of sensory stimuli encoded with MIMO neural circuits.’ Computational intelligence and neuroscience (2010): 2.Applicant
- Legenstein, R., et al. (2008), .A learning theory for reward-modulated spike timingsdependent plasticity with application to biofeedback. PLoS Computational Biology. 4(10): 1-27.Applicant
- Lendek Babushka Z.S., and De Schutter B. (2006) State Estimation under Uncertainty- . A Survey: Technical report 06-004 Deth Center for systems and Control Delft University of Technology.Applicant
- Leydesdorff L., et al., “Classification and Powerlaws: The Logarithmic Transformation, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (forthcoming)”, 2006.Applicant
- Leydesdorff, Loet and Stephen Bensman, Classification and Powerlaws: The Logarithmic Transformation, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (forthcoming), 2006.Applicant
- Li, Zhaoping. “A saliency map in primary visual cortex.” Trends in cognitive sciences 6.1 (2002): 9-16.Applicant
- Lin, Long-Ji. “Self-improving reactive agents based on reinforcement learning, planning and teaching.” Machine learning 8.3-4 (1992): 293-321.Applicant
- Lyle N. Long and Ankur Gupta, “Biologically-Inspired Spiking Neural Networks with Hebbian Learning for Vision Processing”, AIAA Paper No. 2008-0885, presented at AIAA 46th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno NV Jan. 2008, pp. 1-17.Applicant
- Makridakis et al., “Evaluating Accuracy (or Error) Measures”, INSEAD Technical Report, 1995/18/TM.Applicant
- Markram, Henry, et al. “Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs.” Science 275.5297 (1997): 213-215.Applicant
- Martinez-Perez, et al., “Automatic Activity Estimation Based on Object Behavior Signature”, 2010, 10 pages.Applicant
- Masakazu et al, “Convolutional Spiking Neural Network Model for Robust Face Detection”, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP'02), vol. 2, 2002, pp. 660-664.Applicant
- Masquelier and Thorpe, Learning to recognize objects using waves of spikes and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity. Neural Networks (IJCNN), The 2010 International Joint Conference on DOI—10.1109/1JCNN.2010.5596934 (2010) pp. 1-8.Applicant
- Masquelier, Timothee, ‘Relative spike time coding and STOP-based orientation selectivity in the early visual system in natural continuous and saccadic vision: a computational model.’ Journal of computational neuroscience 32.3 (2012): 425-441.Applicant
- Matsugu, et al., “Convolutional Spiking Neural Network for Robust Object Detection with Population Code Using Structured Pulse Packets”, 2004, 39-55, 17 pages.Applicant
- Medin I.C., et al., Modeling Cerebellar Granular layer Excitability and Combinatorial Computation with Spikes, Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and Applications (BIC-TA), 2010 IEEE Fifth International Conference on DOI: 10.1 109/BICTA.201 0.5645274, Publication Year: 2010, pp. 1495-1503.Applicant
- Medini C., et al., “Modeling Cerebellar Granular Layer Excitability and Combinatorial Computation with Spikes,” IEEE Fifth International Conference on Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and Applications, 2010, pp. 1495-1503.Applicant
- Meinhardt, Hans, and Alfred Gierer. “Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition.” Bioessays 22.8 (2000): 753-760.Applicant
- Meister, M.; Berry, M.J. The neural code of the retina, Neuron, 1999, 22, 435-450.Applicant
- Meister, M, Multineuronal codes in retinal signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of sciences. 1996, 93, 609-614.Applicant
- Miller III, “Real-Time Application of Neural Networks for Sensor-Based Control of Robots with Vision,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cypernetics Jul./Aug. 1989, vol. 19 (4), pp. 825-831.Applicant
- N Venkateswaran, B Harish, R Chidambareswaran, “A Novel Perspective into the Neuronal Encoding Along the Retinal Pathway Employing Time-Frequency Transformation: Part II—For Color”, Brain Inspired Cognitive systems, 2004, pp. BIS4-31-BIS4-37.Applicant
- Natalia C., et al., “Spike Timing-dependent Plasticity: a Hebbian Learning Rule,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2008, vol. 31, pp. 25-46.Applicant
- Nguyen et al., “Estimating divergence functionals and the likelihood ratio by penalized convex risk minimization” 2007, pp. 1-8.Applicant
- Nichols, A Re configurable Computing Architecture for Implementing Artificial Neural Networks on FPGA, Master's Thesis, The University of Guelph, 2003, pp. 1-235.Applicant
- Nikolic, K., San Segundo Bello D.. Delbruck T, Liu, S.. and Roska, B. High-sensitivity silicon retina for robotics and prosthetics 2011.Applicant
- Niv, et al., Evolution of Reinforcement Learning in Uncertain Environments: A Simple Explanation for Complex Foraging Behaviors, International Society for Adaptive Behavior, 2002, vol. 10(1), pp. 5-24.Applicant
- Oja, Erkki (2008), Scholarpedia “Oja learning rule.”Applicant
- Ojala et al., “Performance Evaluation of Texture Measures with Classification Based on Kuliback Discrimination of Distributions” 1994 IEEE, pp. 582-585.Applicant
- Oster M., Lichtsteiner P,, Delbruck T, Liu S, A Spike-Based Saccadic Recognition System, ISCAS 2007. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2009, pp. 3083-3086.Applicant
- Ostojic, Srdjan, Nicolas Brunei, From Spiking Neuron Models to Linear-Nonlinear Models, Jan. 2011,vol. 7, Issue I, e1001056.Applicant
- Ostojic, Srdjan, Nicolas Brunel, From Spiking Neuron Models to Linear-Nonlinear Models, Jan. 2011, vol. 7 (1), e1001056.Applicant
- Ozuysal et al., “Fast Keypoint Recognition in len Lines of Code” CVPR 2007.Applicant
- Ozuysal et al., “Fast Keypoint Recognition Using Random Ferns” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 32, No. 3, Mar. 2010. pp. 448-461.Applicant
- Paugam-Moisy et al., “Computing with spiking neuron networks” G. Rozenberg T. Back, J, Kok (Eds.), Handbook of Natural Computing, Springer-Verlag (2010) [retrieved Dec. 30, 2013], [retrieved online from link.springer.com ].Applicant
- Pavlidis et al. Spiking neural network training using evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networkds, 2005. IJCNN'05, vol. 4, pp. 2190-2194 Publication Date Jul. 31, 2005 [online] [Retrieved on Dec. 10, 2013] Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu! viewdoc/download?doi=0.1.1.5.4346&rep—repl&type-pdf.Applicant
- Pfister (2003), Optimal Hebbian Learning: A Probabilistic Point of View. In ICANN Proceedings. Springer, pp. 92-98.Applicant
- Pfister (2006), Optimal Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity for Precise Action Potential Firing in Supervised Learning, Neural computation ISSN 0899-7667, 18 (6).Applicant
- Phenomenological models of synaptic plasticity based on spike timing Abigail Morrison Markus Diesmann Wulfram Gerstner Received: Jan. 16, 2008 / Accepted: Apr. 9, 2008 © The Author(s) 2008.Applicant
- Ponulak, “Analysis of the Resume learning Process for Spiking Neural Networks,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics & Computer Science, 2008, vol. 18 (2), pp. 117-127.Applicant
- Ponulak, F., (2005), ReSuMe—New supervised learning method for Spiking Neural Networks. Technical Report, Institute of Control and Information Engineering, Poznan University of Technology.Applicant
- Ponulak, F., Kasinski, A.: Supervised learning in spiking neural networks with ReSuMe: sequence learning, classification, and spike shifting. Neural Comp .22(2): 467-510.Applicant
- Prokhorov, Danil V., and Lee A. Feldkamp. “Primitive adaptive critics.” Neural Networks, 1997., International Conference on. vol. 4. IEEE, 1997.Applicant
- QingXiang Wu et al, Edge Detection Based on Spiking Neural Network Model, ICIC 2007, LNAI 4682, pp. 26-34,2007, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.Applicant
- Rafael Serrano-Gotarredona, Teresa Serrano-Gotarredona, Antonio Acosta-Jimenez, and Bernabe Linares-Barranco, “A Neuromorphic Cortical-Layer Microchip for Spike-Based Event Processing Vision Systems”, Circuits and Systems 1: Regular Papers, IEEE Transactions on (vol. 53, Issue: 12), Dec. 12, 2006, pp. 2548-2566.Applicant
- Ramachandran, et al., “The Perception of Phantom Limbs”, The D.O. Hebb Lecture, Center for Brain and Cognition, University of California, 1998, 121, 1603-1630,28 pages.Applicant
- Rebecca L. VislayMeltzer, Adam R. kampff, Florian Engert, “Spatiotemporal Specificity of neurol activity directs the modification of receptive fields in the developing retinotectal system”, neuron 50, Apr. 6, 2006, pp. 101-114.Applicant
- Reiman et al. (1989), Sensitivity analysis for simulations via likelihood ratios. Oper Res 37, 830-844.Applicant
- Reinforcement Learning in Intelligent Control: A Biologically-Inspired Approach to the Relearning Problem. Brendan D'Cruz May 1998.Applicant
- Reinforcement Learning Through Modulation of Spike-Timing-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity, Razvan V. Florian Neural Computation 19, 1468-1502 (2007) Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Applicant
- Rekeczky, et al., “Cellular Multiadaptive Analogic Architecture: A Computational Framework for UAV Applications.” May 2004.Applicant
- Revow M., Williams C,, and Hinton, G.E., 1996. Using Generative Models for Handwritten Digit Recognition, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18, No. 6, Jun. 1996.Applicant
- Robbins (1951), A Stochastic Approximation Method, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22, #3, 400-407.Applicant
- Rosenstein et al., (2002), Supervised learning combined with an actor-critic architecture, Technical Report 02-41, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Applicant
- Rumelhart (1986), Learning internal representations by error propagation, Parallel distributed processing, vol. 1 (pp. 318-362), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Applicant
- Rumelhart et a[., (1986), Learning representations by back-propagating errors, Nature 323 (6088) , pp. 533-536.Applicant
- Sanchez, Efficient Simulation Scheme for Spiking Neural Networks. Doctoral Thesis. (Juiversita di Granada Mar. 28, 2008, pp. 1-104.Applicant
- Sato et al., ‘Pulse interval and width modulation for video transmission.’ Cable Television, IEEE Transactions on 4 (1978): 165-173.Applicant
- Schemmel, J., Grub!, A., Meier, K., Mueller, E.: Implementing synaptic plasticity in a VLSI spiking neural network model. In: Proceedings of the 20061ntemational Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN'06), IEEE Press (2006) Jul. 16-21, 2006, pp. 1-6 [online], [retrieved on Aug. 24, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.kip.uniheidelberg.deNeroeffentlichungen/download.cgi/4620/ps/1774.pdf> Introduction.Applicant
- Schnitzer, M.J.; Meister, M.; Multineuronal Firing Patterns in the Signal from Eye to Brain. Neuron, 2003, 37, 499-511.Applicant
- Schrauwen et al., “Improving SpikeProp: Enhancements to an Error-Backpropagation Rule for Spiking Neural Networks”, ProsRISC Workshop, 2004, pp. 301-305.Applicant
- Schreiber S., et al., “A New Correlation-based Measure of Spike Timing Reliability,” Neurocomputing, 2003, vol. 52-54, pp. 925-931.Applicant
- Serrano-Gotarredona, et al, “On Real-Time: AER 2-D Convolutions Hardware for Neuromorphic Spike-based Cortical Processing”, Jul. 2008.Applicant
- Seung. H. “Learning in spiking neural networks by reinforcement of stochastic synaptic transmission.” Neuron vol. 40 No. 6 (2003): pp. 1063-1073.Applicant
- Simulink.RTM. model [online], [Retrieved on Dec. 10, 2013] Retrieved from <:URL: http://www.mathworks.com/ products/simulink/index.html>.Applicant
- Sinyavskiy, et al. (2010), Generalized Stochatic Spiking Neuron Model and Extended Spike Response Model in Spatial-Temporal Impulse Pattern Detection Task Optical Memory and Neural Networks (Information Optics) 2010 vol. 19 No. 4 pp. 300-309.Applicant
- Sinyavskiy et al. ‘Reinforcement learning of a spiking neural network in the task of control of an agent in a virtual discrete environment’ Rus, J. Nonlin. Dyn., 2011, vol. 7, No. 4 (Mobile Robots), pp. 859-875, chapters 1-8 (Russian Article with English Abstract).Applicant
- Sinyavskiy O. Yu., “Obuchenics podkrepleniem spaikovoy neiroiniy seti v zadache upravleniya agentom v diskretnoy virtualnoy srede,” Nelineinaya Dinamika, 2011, vol. T. 7 (24), pp. 859-875.Applicant
- Sjostrom et al., ‘Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity’ Scholarpedia, 5(2):1362 (2010), pp. 1-18.Applicant
- Steele P.M., et al., “Inhibitory Control of LTP and LTD: Stability of Synapse Strength,” Journal of Neurophysiology, 1999, vol. 81 (4), pp. 1559-1566.Applicant
- Stein. R.B..(1967).Some models of neural variability. Biophys. J.. 7:.37-68.Applicant
- Stringer, et al., “Invariant Object Recognition in the Visual System with Novel Views of 3D Objects”, 2002, 2585-2596, 12 pages.Applicant
- Supervised learning in Spiking Neural .Networks with ReSuMe Method. Filip Ponulak, Doctoral Dissertation Poznan, Poland 2006.Applicant
- Sutton R.S. (1988). Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences. Machine Learning 3(1), 9-44.Applicant
- SWAT: A Spiking Neural Network Training Algorithm for Classification Problems, Wade, J.J. ; McDaid, L.J. ; Santos, J.A. ; Sayers, H.M., Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on vol. 21 , Issue: 11 DOI: 10.1109/TNN.2010.2074212 Publication Year: 2010 , pp. 1817-1830.Applicant
- Swiercz, Waldemar, et al. “A new synaptic plasticity rule for networks of spiking neurons.” Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on 17.1 (2006): 94-105.Applicant
- Szatmary et al,, “Spike-timing Theory of Working Memory” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 6, Issue 8, Aug. 19, 2010 [retrieved on Dec. 30, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.ploscompbioLorg/article/info%3Adoi% 2F10.1371%2Fjournal,pcbi.1000879<url:></url:>.Applicant
- Tegner J., et al., “An Adaptive Spike-timing-dependent Plasticity Rule” Elsevier Science B.V., 2002.Applicant
- Thomas S. and Riesenhuber, M, 2004, Realistic Modeling of Simple and Complex Cell Tuning in the HMAX Model, and Implications for Invariant Object Recognition in Cortex, AI Memo 2004-017 Jul. 2004.Applicant
- Thorpe S.; Ultra-Rapid Scene Categorization with a Wave of Spikes. In H,H. Bulthoff et al. (eds.), Biologically Motivated Computer Vision, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2002, 2525, pp. 1-15, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Applicant
- Thorpe, S.J., Delorme, A. & VanRullen, R, (2001). Spike-based strategies for rapid processing. Neural Networks 14, pp. 715-725.Applicant
- Thorpe, S.J., Guyonneau, R., Guilbaud, N,, Allegraud, J-M, & VanRullen, R. (2004), SpikeNet: real-time visual processing with one spike per neuron. Neurocomputing, 58-60, pp. 857-864.Applicant
- Timothee Masquelier, “Learning Mechanisms to Account for the Speed, Selectivity and Invariance of Responses in the Visual Cortex”, phD thesis published by Universite Toulouse III—Paul Sabatier, U.F.R. Sciences de la Vie et de la Terre, Feb. 15, 2008, pp. 1-192.Applicant
- Tishby et al., (1999), The information bottleneck method, in Proceedings of the 37th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing, B Hajek & RS Sreenivas, eds., pp. 368-377, University of Illinois.Applicant
- Toyoizumi (2007), Optimality Model of Unsupervised Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity: Synaptic Memory and Weigbt Distribution, Neural Computation, 19 (3).Applicant
- Toyoizumi et al., (2005), Generalized Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro rule for spiking neurons that maximizes information transmission, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, (pp. 5239-5244).Applicant
- Van Rullen R,; Thorpe, S, Rate Coding versus temporal order coding: What the Retinal ganglion cells tell the visual cortex. Neural computation, 2001, 13, 1255-1283.Applicant
- VanRullen, R, & Koch, C. (2003), Is perception discrete or continuous? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5), pp. 207-213.Applicant
- VanRullen, R., Guyonneau, R. & Thorpe, S.J. (2005). Spike times make sense. Trends in Neurosciences 28(1).Applicant
- Vasilaki, et al., “Learning flexible sensori-motor mappings in a complex network” Biol Cybern (2009) 100:147-158.Applicant
- Vasilaki et al., “Spike-Based Reinforcement Learning in Continuous State and Action Space: When Policy Gradient Methods Fail” PLoS, vol. 5, Issue 12, Dec. 2009.Applicant
- Visual Navigation with a Neural Network, by Hatsopoulos, Published 1991.Applicant
- Voutsas K., et al., “A Biologically Inspired Spiking Neural Network for Sound Source Lateralization,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2007, 18 (6), 1785-1799.Applicant
- Voutsas K., et al., A Biologically Inspired Spiking Neural Network for Sound Source Lateralization Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on vol. 18, Issue: 6 DOI: 10.11 09/TNN.2007.899623, Publication Year: 2007, pp. 1785-1799.Applicant
- Wallis, G.; Rolls, E. T. A model of invariant object recognition in the visual system, Progress in Neurobiology. 1997, 51, 167-194.Applicant
- Walters, “Implementation of Self-Organizing Neural Networks for Visuo-Motor Control of an Industrial Robot,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 4 (1), Jan. 1993, pp. 86-95.Applicant
- Wang, R. et al., A programmable axonal propagation delay circuit for time-delay spiking neural networks, Circuits and System (ISCAS), 2011 IEEE International Symposium on. May 15-18, 2011, pp. 869-872 [retrieved on Nov. 13, 2013]. [retrieved from ieeexplore.ieee.org].Applicant
- Wang ‘The time dimension for scene analysis.’ Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on 16.6 (2005): 1401-1426.Applicant
- Weaver (2001), The Optimal Reward Baseline for Gradient-Based Reinforcement Learning, UA1 01 Proceedings of the 17th Conference in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 538-545). Morgan Kaufman Publishers.Applicant
- Weber, C. et al. ‘Robot docking with neural vision and reinforcement.’ Knowledge-Based Systems vol. 17 No. 2 (2004): pp. 165-172.Applicant
- Weber et al., (2009), Goal-Directed Feature Learning, in: Proc, International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 3319 3326.Applicant
- Wennekers, T., Analysis of Spatia-temporal Patterns in Associative Networks of Spiking Neurons Artificial Neural Networks, 1999. 1CANN 99. Ninth International Conference on (Conf. Publ. No. 470) vol. 1 DOI:10.1049/cp:I9991116 Publication Year: 1999, vol. 1, pp. 245-250.Applicant
- Wennekers, T., Analysis of Spatia-temporal Patterns in associative networks of spiking neurons Artificial Neural Networks, 1999. ICANN 99. Ninth International Conference on (Conf. Publ. No. 470) vol. 1 DOI: 10.1049/cp: 19991116 Publication Year: 1999, pp. 245-250, vol. 1.Applicant
- Wennekers T., “Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Patterns in Associative Networks of Spiking Neurons,” Artificial Neural Networks, 1999. ICANN 99. Ninth International Conference on (Conf. Publ. No. 470) , 1999, vol. 1, pp. 245-250.Applicant
- Werbos P.J. (1992), or Prokhorov D.V and Wunsch D.C. (1997) Adaptive Critic Designs, IEEE Trans Neural Networks, vol. 8. No. 5, pp. 997-1007.Applicant
- White, D. A., & Sofge, D. A. (Eds.). (1992): Handbook of intelligent control. Neural, fuzzy, and adaptive approaches. Van Nostrand Reinhold—New York.Applicant
- Widrow B. Hoff. M.E. (1960) Adaptive Switching Circuits, IRE WESCON Convention Record 4: 96-104.Applicant
- Widrow, Bernard, Narendra K. Gupta, and Sidhartha Maitre. “Punish/reward: Learning with a critic in adaptive threshold systems.” Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on 5 (1973): 455-465.Applicant
- Williams (1992), Simple Statistical Gradient-Following Algorithms for Connectionist Reinforcement Learning, Machine Learning 8, 229-256.Applicant
- Wiskott, et al., “Slow Feature Analysis”, 2002, 29 pages.Applicant
- Wiskott, L.; Sejnowski, T.J. Slow feature analysis: Unsupervised learning of invariances, Neural Computation, 2002, 14, (4), 715-770.Applicant
- Wohns R.N.W., et al., Day Surgery for Anterior Cervical Microdiskectomy: Experience with 75 Cases, Jul. 11, 2002, pp. 1-3.Applicant
- Wu, QingXiang, et al. “Remembering Key Features of Visual Images based on Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity of Spiking Neurons.” Image and Signal Processing, 2009. CISP'09. 2nd International Congress on. IEEE, 2009.Applicant
- Wysoski et al, “Fast and Adaptive Network of Spiking Neuron for Multi-view Visual Pattern Recognition”, May 3, 2008, Elsevier,Neurocomputing vol. 71, pp. 2563-2575.Applicant
- Xiaohui Xie and H. Sebastien Seung, “Learning in neural networks by reinforcement of irregular spiking”, Physical Review E. vol. 69, letter 041909, 2004, pp. 1-10.Applicant
- Yang Z., et al., “A Neuromorphic Depth-from-motion Vision Model with STDP Adaptation,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2006, vol. 17 (2), pp. 482-495.Applicant
- Yi (2009), Stochastic search using the natural gradient, ICML '09 Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning. New York, NY, USA.Applicant
- Zarandy et al. “Bi-i: A Standalone Ultra High Speed Cellular Vision System.” In: [online]. Dated Jun. 13, 2005. Retrieved on Aug. 16, 2012. Retrieved from the Internet at URL:http://ieeexplore.ieee.orgixplilogin.jsp?tp=tarnumber=14387388turl=http%3A%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs—all.jsp% Farnumber%3D1438738<http:login.jsp?tp=“&amumber=1438738&url=http%3A%2F%2Fiee”></http:>.Applicant
- Zarandy, et al,, “Bi-I: A Standalone Ultra High Speed Cellular Vision System”, Jun. 2005.Applicant
- Paugam-Moisy, et al., “Computing with Spiking Neuron Networks” Handbook of Natural Computing, 40 pages Springer, Heidelberg (2009).Applicant