US 9,358,137 B2Grant

Actuated prosthesis for amputees

Issue Date:2016-06-07

•47 Claims

•18 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

The actuated leg prosthesis comprises a knee member, a socket connector provided over the knee member, an elongated trans-tibial member having a bottom end under which is connected an artificial foot, and a linear actuator. A first pivot assembly allows to operatively connect the trans-tibial member to the knee member. A second pivot assembly allows to operatively connect an upper end of the actuator to the knee member. A third pivot assembly allows to operatively connect a bottom end of the actuator to the bottom end of the trans-tibial member. The prosthesis can be provided as either a front actuator configuration or a rear actuator configuration.

Metadata

Assignee

Victhom Laboratory Inc.

Inventors

Stephane Bedard
Pierre-Olivier Roy

Application Information

Application Number:US 12/815,166

Filing Date:2010-06-14

Priority Date:2002-08-22

Art Unit:3738

Classifications

IPC:

A61F2/66A61F2/64A61F2/68A61F2/30A61F2/50A61F2/60A61F2/70A61F2/74A61F2/76

Patent Drawings (18 sheets)

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001] The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/721,764, filed Nov. 25, 2003, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,736,394 on Jun. 15, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/463,495, filed Jun. 17, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,314,490, which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/405,281, filed Aug. 22, 2002, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/424,261, filed Nov. 6, 2002, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/453,556, filed Mar. 11, 2003, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

[0002] 1. Field

[0003] The present invention relates to an actuated prosthesis for amputees, particularly but not exclusively for a leg prosthesis for above knee amputees.

[0004] 2. Description of Related Art

[0005] Over the years, many kinds of prostheses have been devised in effort to replace the limbs that amputees have lost. In particular, many efforts have been made to develop prostheses that will replace the loss of major limbs such as legs and arms in view of the immense impact that such a loss has on the amputee. All these prostheses have the difficult task of giving to these amputees a life as normal as possible. The task is particularly difficult for leg prostheses due in part to the complexity of human locomotion. Conventional leg prostheses have until now only been using passive mechanisms in the most sophisticated available devices. Conventional leg prostheses are very limited compared to a real human leg and some needs were thus not entirely fulfilled by them.

[0006] According to amputees, specific conditions of use of conventional leg prostheses, such as repetitive movements and continuous loading, typically entail problems such as increases in metabolic energy expenditures, increases of socket pressure, limitations of locomotion speeds, discrepancies in the locomotion movements, disruptions of postural balance, disruptions of the pelvis-spinal column alignment, and increases in the use of postural clinical rehabilitation programs.

[0007] Another problem is that during the amputees' locomotion, energy used for moving the prosthesis mainly originates from the amputees themselves because conventional leg prostheses do not have self-propulsion capabilities. This has considerable short and long-term negative side effects. Recent developments in the field of energy-saving prosthetic components have partially contributed to improve energy transfer between the amputees and their prosthesis. Nevertheless, the problem of energy expenditure is still not fully resolved and remains a major concern.

[0008] A further problem is that the dynamic role played by the stump during the amputees' locomotion renders difficult the prolonged wearing of conventional leg prostheses. This may create, among other things, skin problems such as folliculitis, contact dermatitis, oedema, cysts, skin shearing, scarring and ulcers. Although these skin problems may be partially alleviated by using a silicone sheath, a complete suction socket or powder, minimizing these skin problems remain a concern.

[0009] Similar considerations apply in other prostheses, to a greater or lesser extent as dictated by the particular conditions that are imposed on the prosthesis.

[0010] It is therefore an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate the above disadvantages.

SUMMARY

[0011] In accordance with a first broad aspect of the present invention, there is provided an actuated prosthesis for replacement of an amputated limb, the prosthesis comprising: a primary joint member; a socket connector assembly for connecting a socket to said primary joint member; an elongated structural member having opposite ends spaced apart along, a main longitudinal axis; a connector assembly for connecting a terminal portion to an end of said structural member; a pivot assembly for operatively connecting the structural member to the primary joint member to permit relative rotation between said primary joint member and said structural member about an first axis defined by said pivot assembly; a linear actuator connected at one end to said structural member and at the opposite end to said primary joint member at a location spaced from said pivot assembly, whereby extension or retraction of said actuator induces a corresponding rotation of said primary joint member relative to said structural member about said pivotal axis.

[0012] Preferably, said prosthesis is a leg prosthesis and said actuator is electrically powered.

[0013] In accordance with another broad aspect of the present invention, there is provided an improved actuated leg prosthesis comprising a knee member, a socket connected to the knee member, an elongated trans-tibial member, an artificial foot connected under a bottom end of the trans-tibial member, and a linear actuator. A first pivot assembly allows to operatively connect the trans-tibial member to the knee member. The first pivot assembly defines a first pivot axis that is perpendicular to a main longitudinal axis of the trans-tibial member. A second pivot assembly allows to operatively connect an upper end of the actuator to the knee member. The second pivot assembly defines a second pivot axis that is substantially parallel to the first pivot axis. The second pivot axis is also spaced apart from the first pivot axis and the main longitudinal axis. A third pivot assembly allows to operatively connect a bottom end of the actuator to the bottom end of the trans-tibial member. The third pivot assembly defines a third pivot axis that is substantially parallel to and spaced apart from the first pivot axis.

[0014] Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0015] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an actuated prosthesis with a front actuator configuration.

[0016] FIG. 2 is a partially exploded perspective view of the prosthesis shown in FIG. 1.

[0017] FIG. 3 is an exploded perspective view of the knee member and the first pivot assembly shown in FIG. 1.

[0018] FIG. 4 is an exploded view of the trans-tibial member and the third pivot assembly shown in FIG. 1.

[0019] FIG. 5 is a partially exploded view of the linear actuator and the second pivot assembly shown in FIG. 1.

[0020] FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating the geometrical model with the front actuator configuration.

[0021] FIG. 7 is an exploded view of the optical switch support shown in FIG. 4.

[0022] FIG. 8 is a perspective view of an actuated prosthesis with a rear actuator configuration, in accordance with another possible embodiment of the present invention.

[0023] FIG. 9 is a partially exploded perspective view of the prosthesis shown in FIG. 8.

[0024] FIG. 10 is a side view of the prosthesis shown in FIG. 8.

[0025] FIG. 11 is an exploded perspective view of the knee member, the first pivot assembly and the second pivot assembly shown in FIG. 8.

[0026] FIG. 12 is a partially exploded view of the trans-tibial member and the third pivot assembly shown in FIG. 8.

[0027] FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating the geometrical model with the rear actuator configuration.

[0028] FIG. 14 is a bloc diagram showing an example of a control system for the actuator of the prosthesis.

[0029] FIG. 15 is an exploded perspective view of a further embodiment of a prosthesis,

[0030] FIG. 16 is a view similar to FIG. 15 on an enlarged scale of structural components of the prosthesis of FIG. 15,

[0031] FIG. 17 is a view similar to FIG. 15 on an enlarged scale of the motive components of the prosthesis of FIG. 15,

[0032] FIG. 18 is a longitudinal side section of the prosthesis of FIG. 15,

[0033] FIG. 19 is a view on the line XIX-XIX of FIG. 18,

[0034] FIG. 20 is a view on the line XX-XX of FIG. 18, and

[0035] FIG. 21 is a view on the line XXI-XXI of FIG. 18.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0036] The appended figures show three alternative embodiments of an actuated prosthesis (10) implemented as a leg prosthesis for an above knee amputee. It should be understood that the present invention is not limited to these illustrated implementations since various changes and modifications may be effected herein without departing from the scope of the appended claims and the principles and concepts described may be applied to prosthesis to replicate other limbs such as an arm. For clarity and ease of description, terminology relating to the use as a leg has been utilized but it will be understood that terminology applicable to the equivalent functions in other limbs may be used. For example, reference to a “knee” could be described equally with respect to an “elbow” if the prosthesis is an arm.

[0037] As illustrated, the prosthesis (10) has three alternative configurations, one being a front actuator configuration, another being a rear actuator configuration and the other being an inverted actuator configuration. The front actuator configuration is preferred. FIGS. 1 to 7 show the prosthesis (10) with the front actuator configuration while FIGS. 8 to 13 show the prosthesis (10) with the rear actuator configuration.

[0038] FIGS. 15 to 21 show the inverted actuator configuration.

Front Actuator Configuration

[0039] FIGS. 1 and 2 show the basic components of the prosthesis (10), which include a primary joint referred to as a knee member (12), an elongate structural member referred to as an elongated trans-tibial member (14), and a linear actuator (16) acting between the knee member (12) and the trans-tibial member (14) to cause relative movement between them. The prosthesis (10) also comprises a socket connector assembly (17) for connecting a socket (18) on the knee member (12) and a connector assembly (19) for connecting to a terminal portion of a limb such as an artificial foot (20) under a bottom end of the trans-tibial member (14).

[0040] The socket (18) must achieve adequate effort transfers between the prosthesis (10) and the amputee's stump. The design of the socket (18) is usually a custom operation in order to achieve an optional load transmission, stability and efficient control for the stump's mobility. The socket (18) is generally held in place on the stump of the user by a suction effect created by an appropriate system such as, for example, a flexible suction liner of type “Thermolyn” manufactured by the Otto Bock Inc. The prosthesis (10) can otherwise use any suitable sockets available on the market.

[0041] The socket assembly connector (17) for connecting the socket (18) may comprise a bottom socket connector (22) provided over the knee member (12). The bottom socket connector (22) is preferably removably connected by means of fasteners, for instance screws or bolts. The exact type of bottom socket connector (22) may vary. An example is a connector having a standard male pyramid configuration, such as male pyramid model 4R54 manufactured by Otto Bock Inc. Another example is the sliding connector with male pyramid model 2054-2 manufactured by Ossur Inc. The socket (18) would then be equipped with a corresponding upper connector which fits over the bottom male connector (22). Other types of connectors may be used as well.

[0042] The knee member (12) provides the junction between the socket (18) and the trans-tibial member (14) with at least one degree of freedom in rotation. The knee member (12) range of motion is preferably about 105 degrees, where zero degree is at full extension and 105 degrees is at maximal knee flexion.

[0043] FIG. 3 shows an enlarged view of the knee member (12). The knee member (12) is preferably a fork-shaped item, with two flanges (24) projecting from an upper plate (26). The upper plate (26) includes four threaded holes (28) for the removable fasteners of the bottom socket connector (22).

[0044] The knee member (12) is connected to the trans-tibial member (14) by means of a first pivot assembly (30). The first pivot assembly (30) operatively connects the trans-tibial member (14) to the knee member (12), thereby making possible a relative rotation between these two parts. It should be noted that the first pivot assembly (30) can also be polycentric. This means that the movement between the knee member (12) and the trans-tibial member (14) is not purely rotational but follows a much more complex pattern. The right and left sides of the parts can further be slightly different, thereby causing a slight torsion movement around a vertical axis. Nevertheless, the general overall movement remains substantially a rotation around a pivot axis.

[0045] The first pivot assembly (30) defines a first pivot axis (31) that is substantially perpendicular to a main longitudinal axis (15) extending along the length of trans-tibial member (14) in the frontal plane, as shown in FIG. 1. This first pivot assembly (30) comprises an axle (32) supported by two bearings (34), each mounted in a corresponding housing (36) in the flanges (24) of the knee member (12). An example of bearing (34) is a single groove-bearing model 6300-ZZ manufactured by NSK Inc. Of course, other types of bearings (34) may be used as well. A 10 mm shoulder nut (37) and a set of external spacers (35) retain the bearings (34) on threaded ends of the axle (32). An optical switch support (38), shown in FIGS. 2, 4 and 7, is mounted around the axle (32) between the two flanges (24) of the knee member (12). The support (38) is described later in the description.

[0046] Preferably, as best shown in FIG. 3, a set of energy absorption bumpers (44) is provided at the back side of the knee member (12) to prevent out of range motion.

[0047] These bumpers (44) can be, for example, bumper model GBA-1 manufactured by Tecspak Inc. Of course, other types of bumpers (44) may be used as well. They are mounted on corresponding brackets (42) located on the side and the front of the upper plate (26) of the knee member (12). The brackets (42) are also used to support connectors (78) which are described later in the description.

[0048] As can best be seen in FIG. 4, the trans-tibial member (14) includes three main sections, namely an upper section (14A), a middle section (14B), and a bottom section (14C).

[0049] The upper section (14A) of the trans-tibial member (14) is preferably a fork-shaped item with two flanges (50) projecting from a mounting base (52). The mounting base (52) is rigidly connected to a pair of trans-tibial post bars (54). A back plate (56) is provided at the back. The pair of bars (54) and the back plate (56) are part of the middle section (14B). They are both connected to the bottom section (14C), which is itself formed from two parts (60, 62). The first part (60) is a somewhat U-shaped part under which the second part (62) is attached. The second part (62) is an extension under which the artificial foot (20) is provided. The foot connector assembly (19) for connecting the artificial foot (20) includes a set of threaded holes in which screws are inserted. Other types of connectors may be used.

[0050] The artificial foot (20) may be, for example, a standard 26 cm Trustep prosthetic foot manufactured by College Park Industries Inc. or Allurion model ALX5260 prosthetic foot manufactured by Ossur Inc. Other types of articulated or non-articulated artificial foot (20) may be used if the selected prosthetic foot provides approximately at least the same dynamical response as the ones mentioned here above. The design of the prosthesis (10) is modular and consequently, it can be adjusted to any morphology. The artificial foot (20) may have an exposed metal or composite structure. It may also have a cosmetic covering that gives it the appearance of a human ankle and foot.

[0051] The pair of bars (54) and the back plate (56) provide a space (58) in which most of the actuator (16) is located. The various electronic and electric components may also be attached on either sides of the back plate (56). This compact arrangement keeps the overall dimensions within that of a normal human leg.

[0052] The linear actuator (16) is shown in FIG. 5. The upper end (16A) of the actuator (16) is connected to the knee member (12) by a pivot assembly 80 and the bottom end (16B) is connected to the bottom section (14C) of the trans-tibial member (14). The function of the actuator (16) is to supply the prosthesis (10) with the necessary mechanical energy to execute, in a sagittal plane, the angular displacements synchronized with the amputee's locomotion. The linear motion of the actuator (16) is used to control the angle of the knee member (12) with reference to the trans-tibial member (14). The actuator (16) includes an electrical motor (70) coupled with a mechanism (72, 74) to transfer rotational motion into linear motion. An example of motor (70) is the model BN2328EU manufactured by Poly-Scientific. The motor (70) operates a screw (72) engaged to a fixed follower (74) at the bottom of the actuator (16). The follower (74) is held by a follower support (76). The follower (74) and the follower support (76) constitute the bottom end (16B) of the actuator (16). In use, when the motor (70) rotates, the screw (72) is rotated in or out of the follower (74). This pushes or pulls the knee member (12), thereby causing a relative rotation between the knee member (12) and the trans-tibial member (14).

[0053] The choice of the linear actuator (16) is primarily based on weight versus torque ratio and speed of available motor technologies. It is preferred over a direct drive system coupled directly to the knee member (12) because it takes less space for the torque requirement in human locomotion. It was found that ideally, the actuator (16) must be capable of supplying a continuous force of about 515 N and a peak force of about 2250 N.

[0054] The second pivot assembly (80) operatively connects the upper end (16A) of the actuator (16) to the knee member (12). The second pivot assembly (80) defines a second pivot axis (81) that is substantially parallel to the first pivot axis (31). It is also spaced from the plane defined by its first pivot axis (31) and the main longitudinal axis (15). An example of this configuration is schematically illustrated in FIG. 6. This diagram represents the various pivot axes. The first pivot axis (31) is identified as “O”. The second pivot axis (81) is identified with the letter “C”. Both axes (C, 0) are spaced apart by the distance “r”. This distance creates a lever arm allowing the actuator (16) to move the trans-tibial member (14) with reference to the knee member (12).

[0055] FIG. 5 shows that the second pivot assembly (80) comprises a bearing (82) inserted in a mechanical connector (84) forming the upper end (16A) of the actuator (16). The bearing (82) may be a needle bearing, for example needle bearing model NK14/16 manufactured by INA Inc. It is held in place by means of shoulder screws (86) and aluminum spacers (88). It was found that ideally, the bearing (82) must withstand a static charge up to about 11500 N (2600 lbf) and allows for a typical misalignment of 1 to 3. The needle bearing (82) is preferred since it has practically no mechanical play and a low coefficient of friction when compared to bushing or rod ends. Of course, other types of bearings may be used as well. An axle (90) links the mechanical connector (84) to corresponding holes in the flanges (24) of the knee member (12). The mechanical connector (84) is secured over the motor (70) using a load cell (92), which is described later in the description.

[0056] The bottom end (16B) of the actuator (16) is operatively connected to the trans-tibial member (14) using a third pivot assembly (100), as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5. The third pivot assembly (100) defines a third pivot axis (101) and also preferably comprises one or more needle bearings (102), each mounted in a corresponding housing (64) provided in the first part (60) of the bottom section (14C) of the trans-tibial member (14). Two standard needle bearings (102) may be used for that purpose, for example needle bearing model NK14/16 manufactured by INA Inc. Of course, other types of bearings may be used as well in the second (80) and the third pivot assembly (100). A set of screws (106) and spacers (108) completes the third pivot assembly (100).

[0057] The various structural parts of the prosthesis (10) are preferably made of a light material, for instance aluminum or a composite material, such as carbon fiber, fiberglass or the like. A particularly suitable material is thermally treated 6061T6 aluminum. The various parts are preferably screwed together, although they may be welded and otherwise secured together Screwing the parts together is preferred since this increases manufacturability, facilitates servicing and replacement of the parts, and usually improves the overall aesthetics.

[0058] FIG. 7 shows the specialized mechanical support (38) appearing in FIGS. 2 and 4. This specialized mechanical support (38) is used firstly to fix the optical switches as explained hereafter. Secondly, the specialized mechanical support (38) is used to facilitate the transition between the part of a cable (not shown) between the relatively fixed section of the prosthesis (10) and the relatively movable section thereof.

[0059] Connectors (78), attached to the brackets (42) of the knee member (12), provide the required connections. A similar connector (78) is provided on the motor (70). A two-part wire clamp (39A, 39B) on parts (254) allows to hold the wire on the support (38).

Control System

[0060] The actuator (16) shown in the prosthesis of FIGS. 1 to 7 is controlled by the control system (200) shown in FIG. 14. This figure first shows a set of artificial proprioceptors (210), which are sensors used to capture information in real time about the dynamics of the amputee's locomotion. The set of artificial proprioceptors (210) provide sensing information to a controller (220). The controller (220) determines the joint trajectories and the required forces that must be applied by the actuator (16). The set-point (joint trajectories and the required forces) is then sent to the actuator (16) via the power drive (230) itself connected to the power supply (240).

[0061] The power supply (240) can be, for example, a flexible battery pack belt such as the Lighting Powerbelt model, manufactured by Cine Power International Ltd. Other examples of power supply (240) are the battery model SLPB526495 manufactured by Worley Inc. and the super capacitors manufactured by Cap-XX. Examples of power drive (230) are the 5121 model, manufactured by Copley Controls Corps Inc. and the model BE40A8 manufactured by Advanced Motion Control. It should be noted that the design of the power supply (240) and that of the power drive (230) are not limited to the devices mentioned here above and could be performed by any custom or commercial products if the selected devices meet the electrical specification of the selected actuator (16) used with the prosthesis (10).

[0062] Preferably, the prosthesis (10) further includes a set of sensors (250) to provide feedback information to the controller (220). This feedback allows the controller (220) to adjust the forces and various other parameters. Examples of parameters that can be monitored are the relative angle of the knee member (12) and the torque at the knee member (12) being exerted by the actuator (16). Other types of measurements may be taken. The measurement of the relative angle of the knee member (12) can be taken, for example, by a standard commercially available incremental optical encoder (260) such as a reading head model EM1-0-250 and a Mylar® strip (262) marked with evenly spaced increments model LIN-250-16-S2037 manufactured by US Digital Inc. Others sensors used as limit switches for the limitation of the angular motion of the prosthesis (10) are the optical switches preferably mounted onto the specialized mechanical support (38). Cable connectors (78), shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, allow to link the external devices to internal components of the prosthesis (10).

[0063] The optical switches (252) are fixed on the first pivot axis (31) and are used to set the reference angular position of the knee member (12). Once this reference position is known, the optical encoder information is used to compute the knee member (12) angle via motor rotation, roller-screw pitch and prosthesis geometry. Moreover, the optical switches (252) are used to prevent out of range motion by sending a signal to the controller (220) when the knee member (12) approaches critical positions. Of course, the optical switches (252) may be use for other purposes according to the nature of the command associated with the switches detection. Another possible way of measuring the relative angle of the knee member (12) is by using a combination of an absolute optical encoder such as, for example, encoder model E2-512-250-i manufactured by US Digital Inc. and optical switches. An example of these switches is the switch model PM-L24 manufactured by SUNX.

[0064] The measurement of the torque is taken from the force being exerted by the actuator (16) measured by a load cell (92). An example of the load cell is the model LC 202 1 K manufactured by Omegadyne. A connector on the motor (70) links the internal sensor to the cable. It should be noted that the sensors (250) of the prosthesis (10) are not limited to the above-mentioned devices and can be performed by other suitable instruments.

Operation of the Front Actuator Configuration

[0065] In operation, the knee assembly (12) is connected to the socket (18) and the pivot assembly (30) permits relative motion between the trans-tibial member and the knee about a generally transverse horizontal axis. Rotation of the knee member relative to the trans-tibial member (14) is controlled by operation of the actuator (16). The actuator (16) acts between the pivot assembly (80) on the knee member (12) and the pivot assembly (100) at the lower end of the trans-tibial member (14) so that changes in the length of the actuator (16) will cause a corresponding rotation about the pivot (30).

[0066] The length of the actuator (16) is adjusted by control signals from the controller (220) that supplies power to the motor (70) to rotate the screw (72) in one direction or the other. Rotation of the screw (72) causes the follower (74) to move along the screw (72) and this motion is transferred through the connection provided by the pivot assembly (100) to the trans-tibial member (14). This causes a corresponding rotation of the knee member (12) and trans-tibial member (14) about the pivot axis (30) to provide the desired motion. Obviously the rate and extent of rotation may be adjusted through control signals to the motor (70) and the sensors embodied in the prosthesis provide the feedback to the controller (220).

Rear Actuator Configuration

[0067] FIGS. 8 to 13 show the prosthesis (10) in accordance with a second possible embodiment. This illustrates an example of a prosthesis (10) with a rear actuator configuration. This embodiment is very similar to the one using the front actuator configuration. It is illustrated with another kind of actuator (16) and another model of artificial foot (20). The middle section (14B) of the trans-tibial member (14) uses four bars (54) instead of two. It does not have a back plate. Moreover, no bottom extension is provided on the trans-tibial member (14).

[0068] The trans-tibial member (14) also has a shell type architecture composed, for example, of ½″ trans-tibial post bars (54) linking together the knee member (12) and the artificial foot (20). In the illustrated embodiment, the actuator (16) could be a standard linear motor (FIG. 5) or a serial elastic actuator (SEA) (FIG. 8) equipped with a customized commercially available motor (70) although the prosthesis (10) is designed such that it can receive any type of linear actuator (16) of the same approximate size. The SEA actuator (16) (FIG. 8) has a ball screw transmission system including a screw (72) coupled with an elastic device (110) of known characteristics. This actuator (16) (FIG. 8) allows a force control actuation based on the deformation of elastic components. As well, the design allows energy storage, shock tolerance and relatively stable force control. The SEA actuator (16) (FIG. 8) was developed by Gill Pratt of the MIT Leg Laboratory and has been patented in 1997 as U.S. Pat. No. 5,650,704. In one implementation, it was provided with a Litton BN23-28 motor (70) and a ⅜″ diameter with ⅛″ pitch ball screw (72). The SEA actuator (16) (FIG. 8) is commercialized by Yobotic Inc.

[0069] In the arrangement shown in FIG. 8, the torque may be measured, for example, by a standard commercially available potentiometer measuring the compression of the elastic devices of the actuator (16) such as the conductive plastic resistance elements model PTN025 manufactured by Novotechnik Inc. The measurement of the angle between the knee member (12) and trans-tibial member (14) can also be computed directly from the measurement of the length of the actuator (16) and the known geometry of the prosthesis. A standard commercially available incremental optical encoder (260), such as reading head model EMI-0-250 is mounted on the moveable part and a Mylar strip (262) marked with evenly spaced increments (model LIN-250-16-S2037 manufactured by US Digital Inc.) is secured to the stationary part. As the motor (70) rotates the drive screw (70), a direct reading of the length of the actuator (16) is thus obtained.

[0070] FIG. 13 illustrates the geometrical model of the rear actuator configuration. It is essentially similar to that of the front actuator configuration as shown in FIG. 6.

Inverted Actuator

[0071] In each of the above embodiments, the actuator (16) has been arranged with the motor (70) adjacent to the knee member (12) and the follower (74) extending to the lower, ankle region of the trans-tibial member (14). Such an arrangement simplifies the routing of the power and control lines and generally allows a tapering profile toward the ankle to conform to the natural profile of a leg. However, with these arrangements the motor (70) moves with the pivot assembly (80) through the range of motion of the prosthesis and accordingly the swept volume of the motor must be accommodated in the design of the knee member (12). Similarly, the location of the motor (70) adjacent the knee member causes variations in the mass distribution and hence the dynamics of the prosthesis during movement of the leg which may result in an unnatural feel to the prosthesis in use. To address these considerations a further embodiment of the prosthesis (10) is shown in FIGS. 15 to 21 in which like components will be described by like reference numerals with a prime suffix (′) for clarity.

[0072] Referring therefore particularly to FIGS. 15 and 18, a prosthesis (10′) has a knee member (12)′ formed as a U shaped member with flanges (24′) extending from the upper plate (26′). The lower ends of the flanges (24′) receive respective bearings (34′) forming part of the pivot assembly (30′) that connects the knee member (12′) to the trans-tibial member (14′). A socket connector assembly (17′) is secured to the upper plate (26′) for connection to an appropriate socket.

[0073] The trans-tibial member (14′) has an upper section (14A′) formed by a pair of spaced webs (300) with bores (302) to receive the bearings (34′) of the pivot assembly (30′). The webs (300) are secured to shoulders, not shown, at the upper end of the middle section (14B′). The middle section (14B′) is formed as an open channel member (304) with laterally spaced side walls (306) interconnected by an integrally formed front wall (308). The channel member (304) is closed by a back wall (310), which is removable to permit access to the interior of the channel member (304). The middle section (14B′) thus provides a lightweight structural member of high torsional and bending strength to meet the loading placed upon it.

[0074] The upper and lower ends (312, 314) respectively of the channel member (304) are enlarged to receive the upper section (14A′) and lower section (14B′) and thereby define a waisted intermediate portion (316). The side walls (306) in the waisted portion (316) have generally planar flanks that support energy storage modules (320), typically battery packs, on either side of the channel member (304). The front wall (308) is also formed with a planar facet (314) to receive a control board (319) associated with the operation of the actuator (16′) and to regulate power flow to and from the energy storage modules (320).

[0075] The back wall (310) also serves as a mounting point for a further control board (322) utilized in the control of the actuator (16′). An external shell (324), formed from front and rear sections (326, 328) respectively, encompasses the intermediate portion (316) and is supported on the enlarged upper and lower ends (312, 314). The shell (324) protects the components mounted on the waisted intermediate portion (316) as well as being contoured to conform to the appearance of a human leg.

[0076] The lower section (14C′) of the trans-tibial member (14′) includes a mounting plate (330) received within the enlarged lower end (314). The plate (330) is bolted the lower ends (314) of the channel member (304) and to the power drive (322) utilized in the control of the actuator (16′) which in turn is secured to the middle section (14B)′. A socket (334) is mounted on the underside of the plate (330) to receive a tubular member (336) of the foot connector assembly (20′). The tubular member (336) extends to a male socket formed on the foot (20′) and its length may be adjusted to tailor the prosthesis to a particular individual. A skirt (338) extends around the tubular member (336) for cosmetic considerations.

[0077] As can best be seen in FIGS. 15 and 17, the actuator (16′) includes a motor (70′) with a screw (72)′. The actuator (16′) is located within the interior of the middle section (14B′) so as to be surrounded by the walls (308, 310, 312), with the screw (72′) extending beyond the upper end (312) and between the flanges (26′) of the knee member (12′). The screw (72′) engages a follower (74′) forming part of the pivot assembly (80′) that is connected to the knee member (12′) at a location spaced from the pivot assembly (30′).

[0078] The motor (70′) is similarly connected through a pivot assembly (100′) to the lower end (314) of the middle section (14B′) at mounting points (340) (FIG. 16) that receive the bearings of the pivot assembly (100′).

Operation of Inverted Actuator

[0079] The operation of the inverted actuator is essentially the same as that of the front mounted actuator with rotation of the motor (70′) causing a change in the effective length of the actuator (16′) and a corresponding rotation of the knee member (12′) relative to trans-tibial member (14′). During such rotation it will be noted that the motor (70′) swings about its pivot assembly (100′) but does not translate along the axis of the prosthesis (10′). The swept volume of the motor through the range of movement is thus reduced allowing better utilization of the space available. It will also be noted that the mass distribution in the prosthesis remains substantially uniform in view of the lack of translation of the motor to provide a more natural feel to the operation of the prosthesis.

[0080] The integration of the energy module and control boards on the middle section also provides a more self contained unit and simplifies the routing of the control and power transmission.

EXAMPLE

Calculation for the Optimal Angle

[0081] One can assume the following technical specifications:

[0082] a geometrical volume corresponding to the anthropometrical volume of a natural shank of an individual having a weight of 70 kg and a height of 170 cm;

[0083] a maximal distance r set at 0.055 m, that is r<0.055 m;

[0084] a minimal and a maximal length L_Tset at 0.3 m and 0.4 m respectively, that is 0.3 m<L_T<0.4 m; and

[0085] a minimal and a maximal distance d_Tset at −0.015 m and +0.015 m, that is −0.015 m<d_T<+0.015 m.

[0086] The geometrical model can be defined with the following equations:

[0087]

\begin{matrix} β = π - θ_{fix} - α - θ_{K} & Equation 1 \\ L_{A} = \sqrt{L_{T}^{2} + d_{T}^{2}} & Equation 2 \\ α = arc \tan (\frac{d_{T}}{L_{T}}) & Equation 3 \\ L^{2} = L_{A}^{2} + r^{2} - 2 \cdot L_{A} r \cdot \cos β & Equation 4 \\ b_{r} = \frac{r \cdot L_{A} \cdot \sin β}{\sqrt{L_{A}^{2} + r^{2} - 2 \cdot L_{A} \cdot r \cdot \cos β}} & Equation 5 \end{matrix}

[0088] where

[0089] θ_KKnee angle, ∠DOA

[0090] r Distance between the center of rotation “O” of the knee member (12) and the attachment point of the actuator (16) on the knee member (12)

θ_fixAngle between r and the stump's center axis, ∠EOC

[0091] L_ADistance between the center of rotation of the knee member (12) and the attachment point of the actuator (16) on the trans-tibial member (14) OB

[0092] L_TLength between the center of rotation of the knee member (12) and the attachment point of the trans-tibial member (14) OA

[0093] d_TDistance between the center axis of the trans-tibial member (14) and the actuator (16) attachment point of the trans-tibial member (14), AB

[0094] α Angle formed between L_T, L_A: ∠AOB

[0095] L Length of the actuator (16), BC

[0096] β Angle formed between L_A, r: ∠BOC

[0097] b_TLever arm of the actuator (16) versus the first pivot axis (31)

[0098] Preferably, the lever arm b_ris assumed to be maximum at a knee angle θ_kof 35 degrees. The geometrical calculation of the mechanical design are based on the setting of the distance r, the length L_T, the distance d_Tand the angle θ_fix. Therefore, these parameters are defined in accordance with the anthropomorphic measurements of the amputee and the selected actuator (16).

[0099] For an angle θ_fix, the optimal value for a maximum lever arm b_ris found when Equation 5 is at a maximum value, that is:

[0100]

\begin{matrix} \frac{\partial b_{r}}{\partial θ_{fix}} = 0 & Equation 6 \end{matrix}

[0101] where θ_fix=π−π−θ_K−β.

[0102] This condition is reached for the configuration shown in FIGS. 6 and 13 when:

[0103]

\begin{matrix} β = \pm \frac{3}{2} π & Equation 7 \end{matrix}

[0104] From Equation 1, the optimal angle between distance r and the center axis of the socket, denoted θ_fix|_optimal, is defined as:

[0105]

\begin{matrix} θ_{fix} ❘_{optimal} = [\begin{matrix} + π / 2 \\ - π / 2 \end{matrix}] - θ_{k} - α & Equation 8 \end{matrix}

[0106] where +π/2 and −π/2 correspond to the rear and the front actuator configuration respectively.

[0107] The result is that the optimal angle θ_fixis preferably set at 125±3 degrees.

[0108] It will be appreciated that alternative dimensions and parameters would apply to other limbs such as an arm but the adaptation of the basic components described above to such an environment could readily be made once the underlying concepts are understood.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. An actuated knee joint prosthesis, the knee joint prosthesis comprising:

a proximal connection member configured to operatively connect the knee joint prosthesis to an amputee;

an actuator assembly comprising a first end, a second end, a powered actuator, and a mechanical elastic member spaced from the powered actuator, the powered actuator and the mechanical elastic member being positioned in series between the first and second ends, the actuator assembly being operatively connected to the proximal connection member at the first end at a position generally corresponding to that of a knee joint, the mechanical elastic member configured for shock absorption caused by the motion of the knee joint prosthesis, the mechanical elastic member and the powered actuator being located distally from the knee joint;

a tibial member operatively connected to the second end of the actuator assembly and rotatably connected to the proximal connection member at least by the actuator assembly; and

at least one torque sensor configured to measure a torque exerted by the actuator assembly,

wherein movement of the actuator causes a corresponding relative rotation between the proximal connection member and the tibial member, and

wherein there is only one powered actuator between the proximal connection member and the tibial member.

2. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the actuator assembly is provided at a rear portion of the prosthesis.

3. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the proximal connection member comprises a socket connector.

4. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, further comprising a controller to control the powered actuator, the controller outputting control signals in response to input signals from at least the torque sensor.

5. The actuated prosthesis of claim 4, wherein the controller has an output connected to a power drive, the power drive supplying electrical energy to the powered actuator, coming from a power source, in response to the control signals.

6. The actuated prosthesis of claim 4, wherein the input signals further comprise signals from sensors mounted on the prosthesis and located outside the prosthesis.

7. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the tibial member comprises a bottom portion configured to operatively connect to a foot prosthesis.

8. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the powered actuator is a linear actuator.

9. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the proximal connection member and the tibial member are directly rotatably connected.

10. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the proximal connection member and the tibial member are indirectly rotatably connected by the actuator assembly.

11. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the proximal connection member and the tibial member are both directly rotatably connected, and indirectly rotatably connected by the actuator assembly.

12. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the powered actuator is a motor.

13. The actuated prosthesis of claim 12, wherein the motor is a rotary motor.

14. The actuated prosthesis of claim 12, wherein the motor can provide power in two directions.

15. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the torque sensor measures compression of the elastic member while the actuator is actuated.

16. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the actuator assembly is configured to provide relatively stable force control.

17. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the prosthesis comprises only one actuator assembly.

18. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the elastic member allows for shock absorption while the actuator is actuated.

19. The actuated prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the elastic member allows for energy storage while the actuator is actuated.

20. An actuated prosthesis, the prosthesis comprising:

a connector configured to operatively connect the actuated prosthesis to an amputee;

a first member operatively connected to the connector;

an actuator assembly comprising a first end, a second end, a powered actuator, and a mechanical elastic member spaced from the powered actuator, the powered actuator and the mechanical elastic member being positioned in series between the first and second ends, the actuator assembly being operatively connected to the first member at the first end, the mechanical elastic member configured to store energy during use of the actuated prosthesis independent of rotary movement of the powered actuator;

a second member operatively connected to the second end of the actuator assembly and rotatably connected to the first member at least by the actuator assembly and a first pivot assembly such that the first member and the second member rotate relative to each other about a first pivot axis, the second member also rotatably connected to the first member by a second pivot assembly independent of the actuator assembly;

at least one torque sensor configured to measure a torque exerted by the actuator assembly; and

a controller configured to control the powered actuator based at least in part on signals from the at least one torque sensor;

wherein rotary movement of the powered actuator causes a corresponding relative rotation between the first member and the second member about a second pivot axis associated with the second pivot assembly, and the relative rotation is affected at least in part by the controller by way of the powered actuator, and

wherein the relative rotation is affected by only one powered actuator.

21. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the actuator assembly is provided at a rear portion of the prosthesis.

22. The prosthesis according to claim 20, wherein the controller has an output connected to a power drive, the power drive supplying electrical energy to the powered actuator, coming from a power source, in response to the signals from the at least one torque sensor.

23. The prosthesis according to claim 22, wherein the power drive is also configured to supply electrical energy to the powered actuator in response to signals from sensors mounted on the prosthesis and located outside the prosthesis.

24. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the powered actuator is a linear actuator.

25. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the actuated prosthesis is a knee joint prosthesis.

26. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the second member is a tibial member.

27. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the first and second members are directly rotatably connected by the second pivot assembly.

28. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the first and second members are indirectly rotatably connected by the actuator assembly.

29. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the first and second members are both directly rotatably connected by the second pivot assembly, and indirectly rotatably connected by the actuator assembly.

30. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the powered actuator is a motor.

31. The actuated prosthesis of claim 30, wherein the motor is a rotary motor.

32. The actuated prosthesis of claim 30, wherein the motor can provide power in two directions.

33. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the at least one torque sensor measures torque by measuring compression of the elastic member while the actuator is actuated.

34. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the actuator assembly is configured to provide relatively stable force control.

35. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the prosthesis comprises only one actuator assembly between the first member and the second member.

36. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the elastic member allows for shock absorption while the actuator is actuated.

37. The actuated prosthesis of claim 20, wherein the elastic member allows for energy storage while the actuator is actuated.

38. An actuated prosthesis to replace the knee joint of an amputee, the prosthesis comprising:

a proximal male pyramid connector;

a first prosthetic member connected to the proximal male pyramid connector;

a second prosthetic member pivotally connected to the first prosthetic member to provide relative rotation between the first and second prosthetic members;

an actuator assembly comprising a motor primarily powered by electricity, and an elastic member in series with and spaced from the motor, the actuator assembly configured to affect the relative rotation between the first and second prosthetic members at a position corresponding to a natural knee joint, the elastic member and the powered actuator being positioned distally from the knee joint; and

a controller configured to control the actuator assembly in response to input signals from one or more sensors, at least one of said one or more sensors configured to measure compression of the elastic member while the actuator is actuated, wherein the at least one sensor configured to measure compression of the elastic member is configured to provide an estimate of torque on the prosthesis while the actuator is actuated.

39. The actuated prosthesis of claim 38, wherein the first prosthetic member comprises a knee member and the second prosthetic member comprises a trans-tibial member.

40. The actuated prosthesis of claim 38, wherein the first prosthetic member and the second prosthetic member form part of a leg prosthesis.

41. The actuated prosthesis of claim 40, wherein the leg prosthesis comprises an artificial foot.

42. The actuated prosthesis of claim 38, wherein there is only one motor that affects relative rotation between the first and second prosthetic members.

43. The actuated prosthesis of claim 38, wherein the elastic member is configured to provide shock absorption.

44. The actuated prosthesis of claim 38, wherein the elastic member is configured to provide energy storage.

45. The actuated prosthesis of claim 38, wherein the motor can provide power in two directions.

46. The actuated prosthesis of claim 38, wherein the actuator assembly is configured to provide relatively stable force control.

47. The actuated prosthesis of claim 38, further comprising a socket connected to the proximal male pyramid connector.

Patent Citations (467)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US909859(A)	1909-01-01	Apgar	Applicant
US2568051(A)	1951-09-01	Catranis	Applicant
US2619652(A)	1952-12-01	Vesper	Applicant
US2843853(A)	1958-07-01	Mauch	Applicant
US2859451(A)	1958-11-01	Mauch	Applicant
US3316558(A)	1967-05-01	Mortensen	Applicant
US3417409(A)	1968-12-01	Prahl	Applicant
US3501776(A)	1970-03-01	Beeker et al.	Applicant
US3589134(A)	1971-06-01	Hackmann	Applicant
US3659294(A)	1972-05-01	Glabiszewski	Applicant
US3701368(A)	1972-10-01	Stern	Applicant
US3791375(A)	1974-02-01	Pfeifer	Applicant
US3820168(A)	1974-06-01	Horvath	Applicant
US3866246(A)	1975-02-01	Seamone et al.	Applicant
US3871032(A)	1975-03-01	Karas	Applicant
US3995324(A)	1976-12-01	Burch	Applicant
US4005496(A)	1977-02-01	Wilkes	Applicant
US4023215(A)	1977-05-01	Moore	Applicant
US4030141(A)	1977-06-01	Graupe	Applicant
US4064569(A)	1977-12-01	Campbell	Applicant
US4065815(A)	1978-01-01	Sen-Jung	Applicant
US4100918(A)	1978-07-01	Glancy	Applicant
US4179759(A)	1979-12-01	Smith	Applicant
US4209860(A)	1980-07-01	Graupe	Applicant
US4212087(A)	1980-07-01	Mortensen	Applicant
US4310932(A)	1982-01-01	Nader et al.	Applicant
US4314379(A)	1982-02-01	Tanie et al.	Applicant
US4354676(A)	1982-10-01	Ariel	Applicant
US4386891(A)	1983-06-01	Riefel et al.	Applicant
US4387472(A)	1983-06-01	Wilson	Applicant
US4433679(A)	1984-02-01	Mauldin et al.	Applicant
US4458367(A)	1984-07-01	May	Applicant
US4518307(A)	1985-05-01	Bloch	Applicant
US4521924(A)	1985-06-01	Jacobsen et al.	Applicant
US4556956(A)	1985-12-01	Dickenson et al.	Applicant
US4558704(A)	1985-12-01	Petrofsky	Applicant
US4569352(A)	1986-02-01	Petrofsky et al.	Applicant
US4578083(A)	1986-03-01	Williams	Applicant
US4600357(A)	1986-07-01	Coules	Applicant
US4602619(A)	1986-07-01	Wolf et al.	Applicant
US4617920(A)	1986-10-01	Carsalade	Applicant
US4649934(A)	1987-03-01	Fraser et al.	Applicant
US4657000(A)	1987-04-01	Hepburn	Applicant
US4657470(A)	1987-04-01	Clarke et al.	Applicant
US4685926(A)	1987-08-01	Haupt	Applicant
US4685927(A)	1987-08-01	Haupt	Applicant
US4711242(A)	1987-12-01	Petrofsky	Applicant
US4726404(A)	1988-02-01	Haber et al.	Applicant
US4730625(A)	1988-03-01	Fraser et al.	Applicant
US4760850(A)	1988-08-01	Phillips et al.	Applicant
US4770662(A)	1988-09-01	Giampapa	Applicant
US4776326(A)	1988-10-01	Young et al.	Applicant
US4776852(A)	1988-10-01	Rubic	Applicant
US4790522(A)	1988-12-01	Drutchas	Applicant
US4795474(A)	1989-01-01	Horvath	Applicant
US4805455(A)	1989-02-01	DelGiorno et al.	Applicant
US4808187(A)	1989-02-01	Patterson et al.	Applicant
US4814661(A)	1989-03-01	Ratzlaff et al.	Applicant
US4838251(A)	1989-06-01	Chignon et al.	Applicant
US4843921(A)	1989-07-01	Kremer	Applicant
US4854428(A)	1989-08-01	Horvath	Applicant
US4865024(A)	1989-09-01	Hensley et al.	Applicant
US4872803(A)	1989-10-01	Asakawa	Applicant
US4876944(A)	1989-10-01	Wilson et al.	Applicant
US4878913(A)	1989-11-01	Aebischer et al.	Applicant
US4892554(A)	1990-01-01	Robinson	Applicant
US4893648(A)	1990-01-01	Horvath	Applicant
US4919418(A)	1990-04-01	Miller	Applicant
US4928676(A)	1990-05-01	Pansiera	Applicant
US4944755(A)	1990-07-01	Hennequin et al.	Applicant
US4958705(A)	1990-09-01	Horvath	Applicant
US4989161(A)	1991-01-01	Oaki	Applicant
US4994086(A)	1991-02-01	Edwards	Applicant
US5012591(A)	1991-05-01	Asakawa	Applicant
US5020790(A)	1991-06-01	Beard et al.	Applicant
US5033291(A)	1991-07-01	Podoloff et al.	Applicant
US5044360(A)	1991-09-01	Janke	Applicant
US5062673(A)	1991-11-01	Mimura	Applicant
US5062856(A)	1991-11-01	Sawamura et al.	Applicant
US5062857(A)	1991-11-01	Berringer et al.	Applicant
US5086785(A)	1992-02-01	Gentile et al.	Applicant
US5092902(A)	1992-03-01	Adams et al.	Applicant
US5112296(A)	1992-05-01	Beard et al.	Applicant
US5112356(A)	1992-05-01	Harris et al.	Applicant
US5133773(A)	1992-07-01	Sawamura et al.	Applicant
US5133774(A)	1992-07-01	Sawamura et al.	Applicant
US5139525(A)	1992-08-01	Kristinsson	Applicant
US5153496(A)	1992-10-01	LaForge	Applicant
US5174168(A)	1992-12-01	Takagi et al.	Applicant
US5181931(A)	1993-01-01	Van de Veen	Applicant
US5197488(A)	1993-03-01	Kovacevic	Applicant
US5201772(A)	1993-04-01	Maxwell	Applicant
US5217500(A)	1993-06-01	Phillips	Applicant
US5219365(A)	1993-06-01	Sabolich	Applicant
US5230672(A)	1993-07-01	Brown et al.	Applicant
US5246465(A)	1993-09-01	Rincoe et al.	Applicant
US5252102(A)	1993-10-01	Singer et al.	Applicant
US5252901(A)	1993-10-01	Ozawa et al.	Applicant
US5253656(A)	1993-10-01	Rincoe	Applicant
US5265890(A)	1993-11-01	Balsells	Applicant
US5277281(A)	1994-01-01	Carlson et al.	Applicant
US5282460(A)	1994-02-01	Boldt	Applicant
US5284330(A)	1994-02-01	Carlson et al.	Applicant
US5314498(A)	1994-05-01	Gramnas	Applicant
US5323650(A)	1994-06-01	Fullen et al.	Applicant
US5327790(A)	1994-07-01	Levin et al.	Applicant
US5336269(A)	1994-08-01	Smits	Applicant
US5357696(A)	1994-10-01	Gray et al.	Applicant
US5376128(A)	1994-12-01	Bozeman, Jr.	Applicant
US5376133(A)	1994-12-01	Gramnas	Applicant
US5376137(A)	1994-12-01	Shorter et al.	Applicant
US5376138(A)	1994-12-01	Bouchard et al.	Applicant
US5376141(A)	1994-12-01	Phillips	Applicant
US5382373(A)	1995-01-01	Carlson et al.	Applicant
US5383939(A)	1995-01-01	James	Applicant
US5394132(A)	1995-02-01	Poil	Applicant
US5405407(A)	1995-04-01	Kodama et al.	Applicant
US5405409(A)	1995-04-01	Knoth	Applicant
US5405410(A)	1995-04-01	Arbogast et al.	Applicant
US5405510(A)	1995-04-01	Betts	Applicant
US5408873(A)	1995-04-01	Schmidt et al.	Applicant
US5413611(A)	1995-05-01	Haslam, II et al.	Applicant
US5422558(A)	1995-06-01	Stewart	Applicant
US5437611(A)	1995-08-01	Stern	Applicant
US5443521(A)	1995-08-01	Knoth et al.	Applicant
US5443524(A)	1995-08-01	Sawamura et al.	Applicant
US5443528(A)	1995-08-01	Allen	Applicant
US5472412(A)	1995-12-01	Knoth	Applicant
US5476441(A)	1995-12-01	Durfee et al.	Applicant
US5504415(A)	1996-04-01	Podrazhansky et al.	Applicant
USD372536(S)	1996-08-01	Grifka	Applicant
US5545232(A)	1996-08-01	Van de Veen	Applicant
US5545233(A)	1996-08-01	Fitzlaff	Applicant
US5551525(A)	1996-09-01	Pack et al.	Applicant
US5563458(A)	1996-10-01	Ericson	Applicant
US5566479(A)	1996-10-01	Gray et al.	Applicant
US5571205(A)	1996-11-01	James	Applicant
US5571210(A)	1996-11-01	Lindh	Applicant
US5571212(A)	1996-11-01	Cornelius	Applicant
US5571213(A)	1996-11-01	Allen	Applicant
US5583476(A)	1996-12-01	Langford et al.	Applicant
US5586557(A)	1996-12-01	Nelson et al.	Applicant
US5624389(A)	1997-04-01	Zepf	Applicant
US5642096(A)	1997-06-01	Leyerer et al.	Applicant
US5645590(A)	1997-07-01	Van de Veen	Applicant
US5645752(A)	1997-07-01	Weiss et al.	Applicant
US5650704(A)	1997-07-01	Pratt et al.	Applicant
US5656915(A)	1997-08-01	Eaves	Applicant
USD383542(S)	1997-09-01	Wellershaus et al.	Applicant
US5662693(A)	1997-09-01	Johnson et al.	Applicant
US5670077(A)	1997-09-01	Carlson et al.	Applicant
US5678448(A)	1997-10-01	Fullen et al.	Applicant
US5683615(A)	1997-11-01	Munoz	Applicant
US5695527(A)	1997-12-01	Allen	Applicant
US5704945(A)	1998-01-01	Wagner et al.	Applicant
US5704946(A)	1998-01-01	Greene	Applicant
US5711746(A)	1998-01-01	Carlson	Applicant
US5728170(A)	1998-03-01	Becker et al.	Applicant
US5728174(A)	1998-03-01	Fitzlaff	Applicant
US5746774(A)	1998-05-01	Kramer et al.	Applicant
US5749533(A)	1998-05-01	Daniels	Applicant
US5755812(A)	1998-05-01	Becker et al.	Applicant
US5755813(A)	1998-05-01	Krukenberg	Applicant
US5779735(A)	1998-07-01	Molino	Applicant
US5800561(A)	1998-09-01	Rodriguez	Applicant
US5800568(A)	1998-09-01	Atkinson et al.	Applicant
US5810752(A)	1998-09-01	Grifka	Applicant
US5823309(A)	1998-10-01	Gopalswamy et al.	Applicant
USD402368(S)	1998-12-01	Holzapfel	Applicant
US5842547(A)	1998-12-01	Carlson et al.	Applicant
USD407490(S)	1999-03-01	Zepf et al.	Applicant
US5878851(A)	1999-03-01	Carlson et al.	Applicant
US5888212(A)	1999-03-01	Petrofsky et al.	Applicant
US5888213(A)	1999-03-01	Sears et al.	Applicant
US5888236(A)	1999-03-01	Van de Veen	Applicant
US5888239(A)	1999-03-01	Wellershaus et al.	Applicant
US5888246(A)	1999-03-01	Gow	Applicant
US5893891(A)	1999-04-01	Zahedi	Applicant
US5895430(A)	1999-04-01	O'Connor	Applicant
US5899869(A)	1999-05-01	Barrack, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5900184(A)	1999-05-01	Weiss et al.	Applicant
US5906767(A)	1999-05-01	Karol et al.	Applicant
US5919149(A)	1999-07-01	Allum	Applicant
US5929332(A)	1999-07-01	Brown	Applicant
US5941913(A)	1999-08-01	Woolnough et al.	Applicant
US5947238(A)	1999-09-01	Jolly et al.	Applicant
US5948021(A)	1999-09-01	Radcliffe	Applicant
US5955667(A)	1999-09-01	Fyfe	Applicant
US5957981(A)	1999-09-01	Grammas	Applicant
US5960918(A)	1999-10-01	Moser et al.	Applicant
US5967273(A)	1999-10-01	Hampton	Applicant
US5972035(A)	1999-10-01	Blatchford	Applicant
US5982156(A)	1999-11-01	Weimer et al.	Applicant
US5998930(A)	1999-12-01	Upadhyay et al.	Applicant
US6006412(A)	1999-12-01	Bergmann et al.	Applicant
US6007582(A)	1999-12-01	May	Applicant
USRE36521(E)	2000-01-01	Hiemisch	Applicant
US6039091(A)	2000-03-01	Rodgers et al.	Applicant
US6061577(A)	2000-05-01	Andrieu et al.	Applicant
US6080123(A)	2000-06-01	Pansiera	Applicant
US6086616(A)	2000-07-01	Okuda et al.	Applicant
US6091977(A)	2000-07-01	Tarjan et al.	Applicant
US6093162(A)	2000-07-01	Fairleigh et al.	Applicant
US6095486(A)	2000-08-01	Ivers et al.	Applicant
US6113642(A)	2000-09-01	Petrofsky et al.	Applicant
US6117177(A)	2000-09-01	Chen et al.	Applicant
US6129690(A)	2000-10-01	Hamlin et al.	Applicant
US6139586(A)	2000-10-01	Wagner et al.	Applicant
US6165226(A)	2000-12-01	Wagner	Applicant
US6168634(B1)	2001-01-01	Schmitz	Applicant
US6183425(B1)	2001-02-01	Whalen et al.	Applicant
US6187051(B1)	2001-02-01	van de Veen	Applicant
USD439339(S)	2001-03-01	Sawatzki	Applicant
US6195921(B1)	2001-03-01	Truong	Applicant
US6206932(B1)	2001-03-01	Johnson	Applicant
US6206933(B1)	2001-03-01	Shorter et al.	Applicant
US6241775(B1)	2001-06-01	Blatchford	Applicant
USD446304(S)	2001-08-01	Sawatzki	Applicant
US6301964(B1)	2001-10-01	Fyfe et al.	Applicant
US6342076(B1)	2002-01-01	Lundborg	Applicant
US6350286(B1)	2002-02-01	Atkinson et al.	Applicant
US6352144(B1)	2002-03-01	Brooks	Applicant
US6361570(B1)	2002-03-01	Gow	Applicant
US6373152(B1)	2002-04-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US6379393(B1)	2002-04-01	Mavroidis et al.	Applicant
US6395193(B1)	2002-05-01	Kintz et al.	Applicant
US6409695(B1)	2002-06-01	Connelly	Applicant
US6423098(B1)	2002-07-01	Biedermann	Applicant
US6425925(B1)	2002-07-01	Grundel	Applicant
US6430843(B1)	2002-08-01	Potter et al.	Applicant
US6436149(B1)	2002-08-01	Rincoe	Applicant
US6443993(B1)	2002-09-01	Koniuk	Applicant
US6443995(B1)	2002-09-01	Townsend et al.	Applicant
US6451481(B1)	2002-09-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US6485519(B2)	2002-11-01	Meyers et al.	Applicant
US6494039(B2)	2002-12-01	Pratt et al.	Applicant
US6500210(B1)	2002-12-01	Sabolich et al.	Applicant
US6513381(B2)	2003-02-01	Fyfe et al.	Applicant
US6517585(B1)	2003-02-01	Zahedi et al.	Applicant
US6517858(B1)	2003-02-01	Le Moel et al.	Applicant
US6522266(B1)	2003-02-01	Soehren et al.	Applicant
US6537322(B1)	2003-03-01	Johnson et al.	Applicant
US6587728(B2)	2003-07-01	Fang et al.	Applicant
US6589287(B2)	2003-07-01	Lundborg	Applicant
US6599439(B2)	2003-07-01	Iregar et al.	Applicant
US6602295(B1)	2003-08-01	Doddroe et al.	Applicant
US6610101(B2)	2003-08-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US6613097(B1)	2003-09-01	Cooper	Applicant
US6645252(B2)	2003-11-01	Asai et al.	Applicant
US6663673(B2)	2003-12-01	Christensen	Applicant
US6671531(B2)	2003-12-01	Al-Ali et al.	Applicant
US6679920(B2)	2004-01-01	Biedermann et al.	Applicant
US6719806(B1)	2004-04-01	Zahedi et al.	Applicant
US6733180(B2)	2004-05-01	Nakamura	Applicant
US6740123(B2)	2004-05-01	Davalli et al.	Applicant
US6740125(B2)	2004-05-01	Mosler	Applicant
US6743260(B2)	2004-06-01	Townsend et al.	Applicant
US6755870(B1)	2004-06-01	Biedermann et al.	Applicant
US6761743(B1)	2004-07-01	Johnson	Applicant
US6764520(B2)	2004-07-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US6770045(B2)	2004-08-01	Naft et al.	Applicant
US6780343(B2)	2004-08-01	Hata et al.	Applicant
US6805677(B2)	2004-10-01	Simmons	Applicant
US6811571(B1)	2004-11-01	Phillips	Applicant
US6813582(B2)	2004-11-01	Levi et al.	Applicant
USD499487(S)	2004-12-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
USD501925(S)	2005-02-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US6855170(B2)	2005-02-01	Gramnas	Applicant
US6875241(B2)	2005-04-01	Christensen	Applicant
US6876135(B2)	2005-04-01	Pelrine et al.	Applicant
US6908488(B2)	2005-06-01	Passivaara	Applicant
US6910331(B2)	2005-06-01	Asai et al.	Applicant
US6918308(B2)	2005-07-01	Biedermann	Applicant
US6966882(B2)	2005-11-01	Horst	Applicant
US6966933(B2)	2005-11-01	Christensen	Applicant
US7025792(B2)	2006-04-01	Collier	Applicant
US7029500(B2)	2006-04-01	Martin	Applicant
US7042197(B2)	2006-05-01	Turner et al.	Applicant
US7063727(B2)	2006-06-01	Phillips et al.	Applicant
US7066896(B1)	2006-06-01	Kiselik	Applicant
US7066964(B2)	2006-06-01	Wild	Applicant
US7101487(B2)	2006-09-01	Hsu et al.	Applicant
US7118601(B2)	2006-10-01	Yasui	Applicant
US7131998(B2)	2006-11-01	Pasolini	Applicant
US7137998(B2)	2006-11-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US7147667(B2)	2006-12-01	Bedard	Applicant
US7150762(B2)	2006-12-01	Caspers	Applicant
US7164967(B2)	2007-01-01	Etienne-Cummings et al.	Applicant
US7182738(B2)	2007-02-01	Bonutti et al.	Applicant
US7198071(B2)	2007-04-01	Bisbee, III et al.	Applicant
US7209788(B2)	2007-04-01	Nicolelis et al.	Applicant
US7279009(B2)	2007-10-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US7295892(B2)	2007-11-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US7314490(B2)	2008-01-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US7381192(B2)	2008-06-01	Brodard	Applicant
US7396337(B2)	2008-07-01	McBean et al.	Applicant
US7410338(B2)	2008-08-01	Schiele et al.	Applicant
US7410471(B1)	2008-08-01	Campbell et al.	Applicant
US7410472(B2)	2008-08-01	Yakimovich et al.	Applicant
US7431737(B2)	2008-10-01	Ragnarsdottir et al.	Applicant
US7455696(B2)	2008-11-01	Bisbee, III et al.	Applicant
US7462201(B2)	2008-12-01	Christensen	Applicant
US7485152(B2)	2009-02-01	Haynes et al.	Applicant
US7503900(B2)	2009-03-01	Goswami	Applicant
US7520904(B2)	2009-04-01	Christensen	Applicant
US7531006(B2)	2009-05-01	Clausen et al.	Applicant
US7552664(B2)	2009-06-01	Bulatowicz	Applicant
US7575602(B2)	2009-08-01	Amirouche et al.	Applicant
US7588604(B2)	2009-09-01	Okuda	Applicant
US7637957(B2)	2009-12-01	Ragnarsdóttir et al.	Applicant
US7637959(B2)	2009-12-01	Clausen et al.	Applicant
US7641700(B2)	2010-01-01	Yasui	Applicant
US7655050(B2)	2010-02-01	Palmer et al.	Applicant
US7691154(B2)	2010-04-01	Asgeirsson et al.	Applicant
US7736394(B2)	2010-06-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US7799091(B2)	2010-09-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US7811333(B2)	2010-10-01	Jónsson et al.	Applicant
US7811334(B2)	2010-10-01	Ragnarsdottir et al.	Applicant
US7815689(B2)	2010-10-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US7867284(B2)	2011-01-01	Bedard	Applicant
US7896927(B2)	2011-03-01	Clausen et al.	Applicant
US7918808(B2)	2011-04-01	Simmons	Applicant
US7942935(B2)	2011-05-01	Iversen et al.	Applicant
US7955398(B2)	2011-06-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US8007544(B2)	2011-08-01	Jonsson et al.	Applicant
US8048007(B2)	2011-11-01	Roy	Applicant
US8048172(B2)	2011-11-01	Jonsson et al.	Applicant
US8057550(B2)	2011-11-01	Clausen	Applicant
US8075633(B2)	2011-12-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US8083807(B2)	2011-12-01	Auberger et al.	Applicant
US8109890(B2)	2012-02-01	Kamiar et al.	Applicant
US8231687(B2)	2012-07-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US8287477(B1)	2012-10-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US8323354(B2)	2012-12-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US8403997(B2)	2013-03-01	Sykes et al.	Applicant
US8435309(B2)	2013-05-01	Gilbert et al.	Applicant
US8657886(B2)	2014-02-01	Clausen et al.	Applicant
US8702811(B2)	2014-04-01	Ragnarsdottir et al.	Applicant
US8801802(B2)	2014-08-01	Oddsson et al.	Applicant
US8814949(B2)	2014-08-01	Gramnaes	Applicant
US8852292(B2)	2014-10-01	Ragnarsdottir et al.	Applicant
US2001/0029400(A1)	2001-10-01	Deffenbaugh et al.	Applicant
US2002/0052663(A1)	2002-05-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US2002/0087216(A1)	2002-07-01	Atkinson et al.	Applicant
US2002/0198604(A1)	2002-12-01	Schulman et al.	Applicant
US2003/0019700(A1)	2003-01-01	Wittig	Applicant
US2003/0120183(A1)	2003-06-01	Simmons	Examiner
US2004/0064195(A1)	2004-04-01	Herr	Applicant
US2004/0083007(A1)	2004-04-01	Molino et al.	Applicant
US2004/0193286(A1)	2004-09-01	Grundel	Applicant
US2005/0107889(A1)	2005-05-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US2005/0283257(A1)	2005-12-01	Bisbee et al.	Applicant
US2006/0069336(A1)	2006-03-01	Krebs et al.	Applicant
US2006/0184280(A1)	2006-08-01	Oddsson et al.	Applicant
US2006/0201757(A1)	2006-09-01	Dupuis et al.	Applicant
US2006/0249315(A1)	2006-11-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US2006/0259153(A1)	2006-11-01	Harn et al.	Applicant
US2007/0016329(A1)	2007-01-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US2007/0027557(A1)	2007-02-01	Jonsson et al.	Applicant
US2007/0043449(A1)	2007-02-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US2007/0123997(A1)	2007-05-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US2007/0162152(A1)	2007-07-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US2008/0004718(A1)	2008-01-01	Mosler	Applicant
US2008/0046096(A1)	2008-02-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US2008/0097269(A1)	2008-04-01	Weinberg et al.	Applicant
US2008/0306612(A1)	2008-12-01	Mosler	Applicant
US2010/0113980(A1)	2010-05-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US2010/0131101(A1)	2010-05-01	Engeberg et al.	Applicant
US2010/0262260(A1)	2010-10-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US2010/0324456(A1)	2010-12-01	Jó nsson et al.	Applicant
US2010/0324699(A1)	2010-12-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US2011/0106274(A1)	2011-05-01	Ragnarsdottir et al.	Applicant
US2011/0125290(A1)	2011-05-01	Langlois	Applicant
US2011/0130847(A1)	2011-06-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US2011/0137429(A1)	2011-06-01	Bedard	Applicant
US2011/0224804(A1)	2011-09-01	Clausen et al.	Applicant
US2012/0016492(A1)	2012-01-01	Clausen	Applicant
US2012/0191221(A1)	2012-07-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US2012/0209405(A1)	2012-08-01	Herr et al.	Applicant
US2012/0232672(A1)	2012-09-01	Ragnarsdottir et al.	Applicant
US2012/0283844(A1)	2012-11-01	Langlois	Applicant
US2013/0035769(A1)	2013-02-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US2013/0144402(A1)	2013-06-01	Clausen et al.	Applicant
US2013/0204395(A1)	2013-08-01	Gramnaes	Applicant
US2013/0268093(A1)	2013-10-01	Gilbert et al.	Applicant
US2013/0297041(A1)	2013-11-01	Bedard et al.	Applicant
US2014/0243997(A1)	2014-08-01	Clausen et al.	Applicant
CH543277	1973-12-01		Applicant
CN2043873	1989-09-01		Applicant
CN1215614	1999-05-01		Applicant
CN2400072(Y)	2000-10-01		Applicant
DE3543291	1987-06-01		Applicant
DE3923056	1991-01-01		Applicant
DE3923057	1991-01-01		Applicant
DE4229330(A1)	1994-03-01		Applicant
DE19859931(A1)	2007-07-01		Applicant
EP358056	1990-03-01		Applicant
EP380060	1990-08-01		Applicant
EP549855(A2)	1993-07-01		Applicant
EP549855	1993-07-01		Applicant
EP654254	1995-05-01		Applicant
EP902547	1999-03-01		Applicant
EP1125825	2001-01-01		Applicant
EP1107420	2001-06-01		Applicant
EP1166726(A1)	2002-01-01		Applicant
EP1169982(A1)	2002-01-01		Applicant
EP1410780	2004-04-01		Applicant
EP1442704	2004-08-01		Applicant
EP1547567	2005-06-01		Applicant
FR2293185	1976-07-01		Applicant
FR2623086	1989-05-01		Applicant
FR2816463	2002-05-01		Applicant
GB2201260	1988-08-01		Applicant
GB2244006	1991-11-01		Applicant
GB2260495	1993-04-01		Applicant
GB2301776	1996-12-01		Applicant
GB2302949(A)	1997-02-01		Applicant
GB2338653	1999-12-01		Applicant
GB2343848	2000-05-01		Applicant
GB2367753	2002-04-01		Applicant
JP59-32453	1984-02-01		Applicant
JP60-081530	1985-05-01		Applicant
JP60-177102	1985-09-01		Applicant
JP59-189843	1985-10-01		Applicant
JP1-244748	1989-09-01		Applicant
JP3-181633	1991-08-01		Applicant
JP4-78337	1992-03-01		Applicant
JP5-123348	1993-05-01		Applicant
JP5-161668	1993-06-01		Applicant
JP7-24766	1995-01-01		Applicant
JP11-000345	1999-01-01		Applicant
JP11-056885	1999-03-01		Applicant
JP11056885	1999-03-01		Applicant
JP11-215793(A)	1999-08-01		Examiner
JP2001-277175	2001-10-01		Applicant
JP2001277175	2001-10-01		Applicant
JP2002-191654(A)	2002-07-01		Applicant
JP2002-219141	2002-08-01		Applicant
JP2002/533161	2002-10-01		Applicant
JP2005-500	2005-01-01		Applicant
KR2002/0041137	2002-06-01		Applicant
SU1447366	1988-12-01		Applicant
SU1731210	1992-05-01		Applicant
WO94/06374	1994-03-01		Applicant
WO94/09727	1994-05-01		Applicant
WO95/26171	1995-10-01		Applicant
WO96/39110	1996-12-01		Applicant
WO96/41599	1996-12-01		Applicant
WO97/00661	1997-01-01		Applicant
WO97/27822(A)	1997-08-01		Examiner
WO98/38951	1998-09-01		Applicant
WO99/00075	1999-01-01		Applicant
WO99/05991	1999-02-01		Applicant
WO99/08621	1999-02-01		Applicant
WO99/55261	1999-11-01		Applicant
WO/27318	2000-05-01		Applicant
WO/30572	2000-06-01		Applicant
WO/38599	2000-07-01		Applicant
WO1/17466	2001-03-01		Applicant
WO1/54630	2001-08-01		Applicant
WO1/72245	2001-10-01		Applicant
WO2/080825	2002-10-01		Applicant
WO3/003953	2003-01-01		Applicant
WO3/088373	2003-10-01		Applicant
WO2004/017890	2004-03-01		Applicant
WO2005/051248	2005-06-01		Applicant
WO2005/087144	2005-09-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (121)

U.S. Appl. No. 60/395,938, filed Jul. 15, 2002.Examiner
Australian Search Report, Nov. 25, 2005.Applicant
European Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2009 in Application No. 04 802 212.3, filed Nov. 25, 2004.Applicant
Indian Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2008 in Application No. 1424/KOLNP/2006, filed May 26, 2006.Applicant
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion, PCT/CA2004/002035, filed Nov. 25, 2004, date of issuance May 29, 2006.Applicant
Dietl, H., Der Einsatz von Elektronik bei Prothesen zur Versorgung der unteren Extremitat, Med. Orth. Tech. 117 (1997) 31-35.Applicant
English translation of EP 1 169 982 A1.Applicant
English translation of Ota, JP 2002-191654 A.Applicant
EPO—International Search Report, Dec. 5, 2003, PCT/CA03/00902.Applicant
Flowers et al., Journal of Biomechanical Engineering: Transactions of the ASME: Feb. 1977, pp. 3-8.Applicant
Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2010, Patent Application No. 2006-540123, 5 pages.Applicant
Canadian Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2010 in Application No. 2,546,858.Applicant
Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2010 in Application No. 20040039143.8, filed Nov. 25, 2004.Applicant
Blaya, Force-Controllable Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) to Assist Drop Foot Gait, Feb. 2003 (believed to be catalogued on or after Jul. 8, 2003).Applicant
Flowers et al., “An Electrohydraulic Knee-Torque Controller . . . ”; J. Biomed. Eng., Transaction of the ASME; Feb. 1977; pp. 3-8.Applicant
Hanafusa et al., “A Robot Hand with Elastic Fingers and Its Application to Assembly Process,” pp. 337-359, Robot Motion, Brady et al., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982.Applicant
Howard, “Joint and Actuator Design for Enhanced Stability in Robotic Force Control,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1990.Applicant
Pfeffer et al. , “Experiments with a Dual-Armed, Cooperative, Flexible-Drivetrain Robot System,” Proc. 1993 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, vol. 3, pp. 601-608, May 5, 1993.Applicant
Rapport De Recherche Europeenne EP 01169982, mailed on Nov. 6, 2001.Applicant
Sugano et al., “Force Control of the Robot Finger Joint equipped with Mechanical Compliance Adjuster,” Proc. 1992 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intell. Robots & Sys., pp. 2005-2013, Jul. 1992.Applicant
Murray, Ph.D., M.P., et al., Walking Patterns of Normal Men, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 46-A(2):335-360, Mar. 1964.Applicant
Abbas, J.J., et al., Neural Network Control of Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation Systems: Computer Stimulation Studies, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 42(11), Nov. 1995.Applicant
Aminian, K., et al., Estimation of Speed and Incline of Walking Using Neural Network, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 44(3):743-746, Jun. 1995.Applicant
Andrews, B.J., et al., Hybrid FES Orthosis Incorporating Closed Loop Control and Sensory Feedback, J. Biomed. Eng. 10:189-195, Apr. 1988.Applicant
Bachmann, E., et al., Inertial and Magnetic Tracking of Limb Segment Orientation for Inserting Humans into Synthetic Environments, Naval Postgraduate School Dissertation, Dec. 2000.Applicant
Bar, A., et al., Adaptive Microcomputer Control of an Artificial Knee in Level Walking, J. Biomechanical Eng. 5:145-150, Apr. 1983.Applicant
Baten, C., et al., Inertial Sensing in Ambulatory Back Load Estimation, 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 497-498.Applicant
Blumentritt, Ph.D., S., et al. Design Principles, Biomedical Data and Clinical Experience with a Polycentric Knee Offering Controlled Stance Phase Knee Flexion: A Preliminary Report, Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 9(1)18-24, 1997.Applicant
Bogert, A., et al., A Method for Inverse Dynamic Analysis Using Accelerometry, J. Biomechanics 29(7):949-954, 1996.Applicant
Bortz, J., A New Mathematical Formulation for Strapdown Inertial Navigation, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems AES-7(1), Jan. 1971.Applicant
Bouten, C.V., et al., A Triaxial Accelerometer and Portable Data Processing Unit for the Assessment of Daily Physical Activity, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 44(3):136-147, Mar. 1997.Applicant
Bouten, C.V., et al., Assessment of Energy Expenditure for Physical Activity Using a Triaxial Accelerometer, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 26(12), Aug. 1994, 1516-1523.Applicant
Carlson, J.D., et al., Smart Prosthetics Based on Magnetorheological Fluids, Proceedings of the 8th Annual Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Newport Beach, CA, Mar. 2001.Applicant
C-Leg System, Otto Bock, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20040215152410/http:/www.ottobockus.com/products/lower—limb—prosthetics/c-leg.asp, retrieved Mar. 8, 2013.Applicant
Copes/Bionic Ankle, Copes, Inc., copyright 1985.Applicant
Crago, P.E., et al., New Control Strategies for Neuroprosthetic Systems, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 33(2), Apr. 1996, 158-172.Applicant
Dai, R., et al., Application of Tilt Sensors in Functional Electrical Stimulation, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 4(2):63-71, Jun. 1996.Applicant
European Search Report in European Application No. 12178503.4, Nov. 20, 2012.Applicant
Fisekovic, N. et al., New Controller for Functional Electrical Stimulation Systems, Medical Engineering & Physics 23:391-399, 2000.Applicant
Foerster, F., et al., Detection of Posture and Motion by Accelerometry: A Validation Study in Ambulatory Monitoring, Computers in Human Behavior 15:571-583, 1999.Applicant
Foxlin, E., et al., Miniature 6-DOF Inertial System for Tracking HMDs, SPIE 3362, Helmet and Head-Mounted Displays III, AeroSense 98, Orlando, FL, Apr. 13-14, 1998.Applicant
Frank, K., et al., Reliable Real-Time Recognition of Motion Related Human Activities Using MEMS Inertial Sensors, 2010.Applicant
Fujita, K., et al., Joint Angle Control with Command Filter for Human Ankle Movement Using Functional Electrical Stimulation, Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, MA, Nov. 13-16, 1987.Applicant
Gelat, T., et al., Adaptation of the Gait Initiation Process for Stepping on to a New Level Using a Single Step, Exp. Brain Res. 133:538-546, 2000.Applicant
Graps, A., An Introduction to Wavelets, IEEE Computational Science & Engineering, pp. 50-61, Summer 1995.Applicant
Grimes, D., An Active Multi-Mode Above-Knee Prosthesis Controller, Doctoral Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 1979, 158 pages.Applicant
Gronqvist, R., et al., Human-Centered Approaches in Slipperiness Measurement, Ergonomics 44(13):1167-1199, Oct. 20, 2001.Applicant
Hanson, J.P., et al., Predicting Slips and Falls Considering Required and Available Friction, Ergonomics 42(12):1619-1633, 1999.Applicant
Hayes, W.C., et al., Leg Motion Analysis During Gait by Multiaxial Accelerometry: Theoretical Foundations and Preliminary Validations, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 105:283-289, Aug. 1983.Applicant
Herr, H., et al., Patient-Adaptive Prosthetic and Orthotic Leg Systems, Proceedings of the 12th Nordic Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics and Proceedings of the International Federation for Medical & Biological Engineering, 2002.Applicant
Herr, H., et al., User-Adaptive Control of a Magnetorheological Prosthetic Knee, Industrial Robot: An International Journal 30(1):42-55, 2003.Applicant
Herr, H., Presentation at Experiencing the Frontiers of Biomedical Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Mar. 10-11, 2003, 1 page.Applicant
Heyn, A., et al., The Kinematics of the Swing Phase Obtained From Accelerometer and Gyroscope Measurements, 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 463-464.Applicant
Hill, S.W., et al., Altered Kinetic Strategy for the Control of Swing Limb Elevation Over Obstacles in Unilateral Below-Knee Amputee Gait, Journal of Biomechanics 32:545-549, 1999.Applicant
Jonic, S., et al., Three Machine Learning Techniques for Automatic Determination of Rules to Control Locomotion, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 46(3):300-310, Mar. 1999.Applicant
Kidder, S.M., et al., A System for the Analysis of Foot and Ankle Kinematics During Gait. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 4(1):25-32, Mar. 1996.Applicant
Kirkwood, C.A., et al., Automatic Detection of Gait Events: A Case Study Using Inductive Learning Techniques J. Biomed. Eng. 11:511-516, 1989.Applicant
Kirsner, S., A Step in the Right Direction Biomedical Horizons Expanding, Boston Globe, Mar. 17, 2003.Applicant
Kostov, A., et al., Machine Learning in Control of Functional Electrical Stimulation Systems for Locomotion, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 42(6):543-551, Jun. 1995.Applicant
Kuster, M.D., M., et al., Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Downhill and Level Walking, Clinical Biomechanics 10(2):79-84, 1995.Applicant
Lafortune, M.A., Three Dimensional Acceleration of the Tibia During Walking and Running, J. Biomechanics 24(10)877-886, 1991.Applicant
Lee, S., and K. Mase, Activity and Location Recognition Using Wearable Sensors, Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 2002, pp. 24-32.Applicant
Light, L.H., et al., Skeletal Transients on Heel Strike in Normal Walking with Different Footwear, J. Biomechanics 13:477-480, 1980.Applicant
Luinge, H.J., Inertial Sensing of Movement, Doctoral Thesis, Twente University Press, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2002, pp. 9-13. (88 pages).Applicant
Magnetic Fluid Improves Mobility of Prosthetic Leg, Advanced Materials & Processes 9(161): 29-30, Sep. 2003.Applicant
Martin, J.J., Electronically Controlled Magnetorheological Fluid Prosthetic Foot, U.S. Appl. No. 60/371,974, filed Apr. 12, 2002.Applicant
Mayagoitia, R.E., et al., Accelerometer and Rate Gyroscope Measurement of Kinematics: An Inexpensive Alternative to Optical Motion Analysis Systems, Journal of Biomechanics 35:537-542, 2002.Applicant
Moe-Nilssen, R., A New Method for Evaluating Motor Control in Gait Under Real-Life Environmental Conditions, Part 1: The Instrument, Clinical Biomechanics 13:320-327, 1998.Applicant
Moe-Nilssen, R., A New Method for Evaluating Motor Control in Gait Under Real-Life Environmental Conditions, Part 2: Gait Analysis, Clinical Biomechanics 13:328-335, 1998.Applicant
Morris, J.R.W., Accelerometry—A Technique for the Measurement of Human Body Movements, J. Biomechanics 6:729-736, 1973.Applicant
Moseley, A.M., et al., High- and Low-Ankle Flexibility and Motor Task Performance, Gait and Posture 18:73-80, 2003.Applicant
Nadeau, S., et al., Frontal and Sagittal Plane Analyses of the Stair Climbing Task in Healthy Adults Aged Over 40 Years: What Are the Challenges Compared to Level Walking? Clinical Biomechanics 18:950-959, 2003.Applicant
Nakagawa, A., Intelligent Knee Mechanism and the Possibility to Apply the Principle to the Other Joints, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 20(5):2282-2287, Dec. 1998.Applicant
C-Leg Fitting Statistics, Abstract, Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie GmbH & Co., Mar. 2000, 4 pages.Applicant
C-Leg: A New Dimension in Amputee Mobility, Otto Bock Data Sheet, Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie, copyright 1997, 4 pages.Applicant
The Electronic C-Leg Compact Leg Prosthesis System, Instructions for Use, Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie, copyright 2002, 28 pages.Applicant
The Electronic C-Leg Knee Joint System, Instructions for Use, Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie, copyright 2002, available at http://www.ottobockus.com/products/lower—limb—prosthetics/c-leg—instructions.pdg, retrieved Jul. 20, 2006, 32 pages.Applicant
Otto, J., Prosthetic Knees: What's Currently New and Impressive? The O&P Edge, available at http://www.oandp.com/edge/issues/articles/2003-10—03.asp, 4 pages (printed Oct. 2003).Applicant
Otto, J. Prosthetic Knees: What's on the Way? The O&P edge, http://www.oandp.com/edge/issues/articles/2003-10—02 .asp, Oct. 2003, 5 pages.Applicant
Petrofsky, J.S., et al., Feedback Control System for Walking in Man, Comput. Biol. Med. 14(2):135-149, 1984.Applicant
Popovic, D., et al., Control Aspects of Active Above-Knee Prosthesis, International Journal of Man-Machine Machine Studies 35(6)751-767, Dec. 1991.Applicant
Powers, C.M., Ph.D., et al., Stair Ambulation in Persons With Transtibial Amputation: An Analysis of the Seattle LightFoot, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 34(1):9-18, Jan. 1997.Applicant
Rao, S.S., et al., Segment Velocities in Normal and Transtibial Amputees: Prosthetic Design Implications, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 6(2):219-226, Jun. 1998.Applicant
Redfern, M.S., et al., Biomechanics of Descending Ramps, Gait and Posture 6:119-125, 1997.Applicant
Reiner, R., et al., Stair Ascent and Descent at Different Inclinations, Gait and Posture 15:32-44, 2002.Applicant
Reitman, J.S., et al., Gait Analysis in Prosthetics: Opinions, Ideas, and Conclusions, Prosthetics and Orthotics International 26:50-57, 2002.Applicant
Robinson, D.W., Design and Analysis of Series Elasticity in Closed-Loop Actuator Force Control, MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jun. 1996.Applicant
Robinson, D.W., et al., Series Elastic Actuator Development for a Biomimetic Walking Robot, MIT Leg Laboratory, 1999.Applicant
Schmalz, T., et al., Energy Efficiency of Trans-Femoral Amputees Walking on Computer-Controlled Prosthetic Knee Joint “C-Leg,” Proceedings of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, 1998.Applicant
Sekine, M. et al., Classification of Waist-Acceleration Signals in a Continuous Walking Record, Medical Engineering & Physics 22:285-291, 2000.Applicant
Sin, S.W., et al., Significance of Non-Level Walking on Transtibial Prosthesis Fitting with Particular Reference to the Effects of Anterior-Posterior Alignment, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 38(1)1-6, Jan./Feb. 2001.Applicant
Smidt, G.L., et al., An Automated Accelerometry System for Gait Analysis, J. Biomechanics 10:367-375, 1977.Applicant
State-of-the-Art Prosthetic Leg Incorporates Magneto-Rheological Technology, Medical Product Manufacturing News, Nov. 2000, p. 42.Applicant
Suga, T., et al., Newly Designed Computer Controlled Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis (Intelligent Orthosis), Prosthetics and Orthotics International 22:230-239, 1998.Applicant
Thakkar, S., Energy Economy Gait Analysis of an Autoadaptive Prosthetic Knee, Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, copyright 2002, 58 pages.Applicant
Tomovic, R., et al., A Finite State Approach to the Synthesis of Bioengineering Control Systems, IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics HFE-7(2):65-69, Jun. 1966.Applicant
Tong, K.Y., and M.H. Granat, A Practical Gait Analysis System Using Gyroscopes, Medical Engineering & Physics 21(2):87-94, Mar. 1999.Applicant
Tong, K.Y., and M.H. Granat, Virtual Artificial Sensor Technique for Functional Electrical Stimulation, Medical Engineering & Physics 20:458-468, 1998.Applicant
Townsend, M.A., et al., Biomechanics and Modeling of Bipedal Climbing and Descending, Journal of Biomechanics 9(4):227-239, 1976.Applicant
Van Der Kooij, H., et al., A Multisensory Integration Model of Human Stance Control, Biol. Cybern. 80:299-308, 1999.Applicant
Van Der Loos, H.F.M., et al., ProVAR Assistive Robot System Architecture, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Detroit, MI, May 1999, pp. 741-746.Applicant
Veltink, P.H., et al., Detection of Static and Dynamic Activities Using Uniaxial Accelerometers, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 4(4):375-385, 1996.Applicant
Veltink, P.H., et al., The Feasibility of Posture and Movement Detection by Accelerometry, in 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Oct. 28-31, 1993, San Diego, CA, pp. 1230-1231.Applicant
Wilkenfeld, Ph.D., A., An Auto-Adaptive External Knee Prosthesis, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Sep. 2000, 3 pages.Applicant
Wilkenfeld, Ph.D., A., Biologically Inspired Autoadaptive Control of a Knee Prosthesis, Dissertation Abstract, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Sep. 2000, 1 page.Applicant
Willemsen, A.Th.M., et al., Automatic Stance-Swing Phase Detection from Accelerometer Data for Peroneal Nerve Stimulation, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 37(12):1201-1208, Dec. 1990.Applicant
Willemsen, A.Th.M., et al., Real-Time Gait Assessment Utilizing a New Way of Accelerometry. J. Biomechanics 23(8):859-863, 1990.Applicant
Williamson, M.M., Series Elastic Actuators, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, A.I. Technical Report No. 1524, Jan. 1995, pp. 1-83.Applicant
Woodward, M.I., et al., Skeletal Accelerations Measured During Different Exercises, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering Medicine, 207:79-85, 1993.Applicant
Wu, G., The Study of Kinematic Transients in Locomotion Using the Integrated Kinematic Sensor, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 4(3):193-200, Sep. 1996.Applicant
Carlson, J. David, What makes a Good MR Fluid?, 8th International Conference on Electrorheological (ER) Fluids and magnetorheological (MR) Suspensions, Nice 7 pages, Jul. 9-13, 2001.Applicant
Flowers, W.C., A Man-Interactive Simulator System for Above-Knee Prosthetics Studies, Aug. 1972.Applicant
Perry, Jacquelin, MD, Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, 1992.Applicant
Sowell, T.T., A Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of the Mauch Hydraulic Foot-Ankle System, 5 Prosthetics and Orthotics International 87 (1981).Applicant
Lelas, et al., Hydraulic versus Magnetorheological-based Electronic Knee Protheses: A Clinical Comparison, Harvard Medical School, Dept. of Phys. Med. And Rehab., Boston, MA, 2004, pp. 1-16.Applicant
Martens, W.L.J.; “Exploring Information Content and Some Application of Body Mounted Piezo-Resistive Accelerometers,” In P.H. Veltink, & R.C. van Lummel (Eds.), Dynamic analysis using body fixed sensors, Second World Congress of Biomechanics, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 9-12.Applicant
Popovik, D. et al.; Optimal control for an Above-Knee Prosthesis With Two Degrees of Freedom, 1995, pp. 89-98, Jo. Biomechanics, vol. 28, No. 1.Applicant
Proteor, Assembly and Adjustment Instructions for IP50-R, pp. 1-21, Sep. 2004.Applicant
Hashimoto et al., “An instrumented compliant wrist using a parallel mechanism,” Japan/USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, vol. 1, pp. 741-744, ASME, 1992.Applicant
Au et al., “An EMG-Position Controlled System for an Active Ankle-Foot Prosthesis: An Initial Experimental Study,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, IL, Jun. 28-Jul. 1, 2005, pp. 375-379.Applicant
Sigurdsson et al., 12th Nordic Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics : 12 NBC 2002; Jun. 18-22, 2002, Reykjavik, Iceland; regional meeting of IFMBE.Applicant

Abstract