US 9,305,548 B2Grant
System and method for an integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice services environment
Issue Date:2016-04-05
•19 Claims
•8 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A system and method for an integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice services environment may be provided. In particular, the environment may include a plurality of voice-enabled devices each having intent determination capabilities for processing multi-modal natural language inputs in addition to knowledge of the intent determination capabilities of other devices in the environment. Further, the environment may be arranged in a centralized manner, a distributed peer-to-peer manner, or various combinations thereof. As such, the various devices may cooperate to determine intent of multi-modal natural language inputs, and commands, queries, or other requests may be routed to one or more of the devices best suited to take action in response thereto.
Metadata
Assignee
- VoiceBox Technologies Corporation
Inventors
- Robert A. Kennewick
- Chris Weider
Application Information
Application Number:US 14/083,061
Filing Date:2013-11-18
Priority Date:2008-05-27
Art Unit:2657
Classifications
IPC:
G10L15/04G10L15/00G10L15/18G10L15/22G10L15/32G10L15/30
Patent Drawings (8 sheets)
Description
Cross-Reference to Related Application
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/127,343, entitled “System and Method for an Integrated, Multi-Modal, Multi-Device Natural Language Voice Services Environment,” filed May 27, 2008 (which issues as U.S. Pat. No. 8,589,161 on Nov. 19, 2013), the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Field of the Invention
[0002] The invention relates to an integrated voice services environment in which a plurality of devices can provide various voice services by cooperatively processing free form, multi-modal, natural language inputs, thereby facilitating conversational interactions between a user and one or more of the devices in the integrated environment.
Background of the Invention
[0003] As technology has progressed in recent years, consumer electronic devices have emerged to become nearly ubiquitous in the everyday lives of many people. To meet the increasing demand that has resulted from growth in the functionality and mobility of mobile phones, navigation devices, embedded devices, and other such devices, a wealth of features and functions are often provided therein in addition to core applications. Greater functionality also introduces the trade-offs, however, including learning curves that often inhibit users from fully exploiting all of the capabilities of their electronic devices. For example, many existing electronic devices include complex human to machine interfaces that may not be particularly user-friendly, which inhibits mass-market adoption for many technologies. Moreover, cumbersome interfaces often result in otherwise desirable features being buried (e.g., within menus that may be tedious to navigate), which has the tendency of causing many users to not use, or even know about, the potential capabilities of their devices.
[0004] As such, the increased functionality provided by many electronic devices often tends to be wasted, as market research suggests that many users only use only a fraction of the features or applications available on a given device. Moreover, in a society where wireless networking and broadband access are increasingly prevalent, consumers tend to naturally desire seamless mobile capabilities from their electronic devices. Thus, as consumer demand intensifies for simpler mechanisms to interact with electronic devices, cumbersome interfaces that prevent quick and focused interaction can become an important concern. Accordingly, the ever-growing demand for mechanisms to use technology in intuitive ways remains largely unfulfilled.
[0005] One approach towards simplifying human to machine interactions in electronic devices includes the use of voice recognition software, which can enable users to exploit features that could otherwise be unfamiliar, unknown, or difficult to use. For example, a recent survey conducted by the Navteq Corporation, which provides data used in a variety of applications such as automotive navigation and web-based applications, demonstrates that voice recognition often ranks among the features most desired by consumers of electronic devices. Even so, existing voice user interfaces, when they actually work, still tend to require significant learning on the part of the user.
[0006] For example, many existing voice user interface only support requests formulated according to specific command-and-control sequences or syntaxes. Furthermore, many existing voice user interfaces cause user frustration or dissatisfaction because of inaccurate speech recognition. Similarly, by forcing a user to provide pre-established commands or keywords to communicate requests in ways that a system can understand, existing voice user interfaces do not effectively engage the user in a productive, cooperative dialogue to resolve requests and advance a conversation towards a mutually satisfactory goal (e.g., when users may be uncertain of particular needs, available information, or device capabilities, among other things). As such, existing voice user interfaces tend to suffer from various drawbacks, including significant limitations on engaging users in a dialogue in a cooperative and conversational manner.
[0007] Additionally, many existing voice user interfaces fall short in utilizing information distributed across various different domains or devices in order to resolve natural language voice-based inputs. Thus, existing voice user interfaces suffer from being constrained to a finite set of applications for which they have been designed, or to devices on which they reside. Although technological advancement has resulted in users often having several devices to suit their various needs, existing voice user interfaces do not adequately free users from device constraints. For example, users may be interested in services associated with different applications and devices, but existing voice user interfaces tend to restrict users from accessing the applications and devices as they see fit. Moreover, users typically can only practicably carry a finite number of devices at any given time, yet content or services associated with users' other devices that currently being used may be desired in various circumstances. Accordingly, although users tend to have varying needs, where content or services associated with different devices may be desired in various contexts or environments, existing voice technologies tend to fall short in providing an integrated environment in which users can request content or services associated with virtually any device or network. As such, constraints on information availability and device interaction mechanisms in existing voice services environments tend to prevent users from experiencing technology in an intuitive, natural, and efficient way.
[0008] Existing systems suffer from these and other problems.
Summary of the Invention
[0009] According to various aspects of the invention, a system and method for an integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice services environment may include a plurality of voice-enabled devices each having intent determination capabilities for processing multi-modal natural language inputs in addition to knowledge of the intent determination capabilities of other devices in the environment. Further, the environment may be arranged in a centralized manner, a distributed peer-to-peer manner, or various combinations thereof. As such, the various devices may cooperate to determine intent of multi-modal natural language inputs, and commands, queries, or other requests may be routed to one or more of the devices best suited to take action in response thereto.
[0010] According to various aspects of the invention, the integrated natural language voice services environment arranged in the centralized manner includes an input device that receives a multi-modal natural language input, a central device communicatively coupled to the input device, and one or more secondary devices communicatively coupled to the central device. Each of the input device, the central device, and the one or more secondary devices may have intent determination capabilities for processing multi-modal natural language inputs. As such, an intent of a given multi-modal natural language input may be determined in the centralized manner by communicating the multi-modal natural language input from the input device to the central device. Thereafter, the central device may aggregate the intent determination capabilities of the input device and the one or more secondary devices and determine an intent of the multi-modal natural language input using the aggregated intent determination capabilities. The input device may then receive the determined intent from the central device and invoke at least one action at one or more of the input device, the central device, or the secondary devices based on the determined intent.
[0011] According to various aspects of the invention, the integrated natural language voice services environment arranged in the distributed manner includes an input device that receives a multi-modal natural language input, a central device communicatively coupled to the input device and one or more secondary devices communicatively coupled to the input device, wherein each of the input device and the one or more secondary devices may have intent determination capabilities for processing multi-modal natural language inputs, as in the centralized implementation. However, the distributed implementation may be distinct from the centralized implementation in that a preliminary intent of the multi-modal natural language input may be determined at the input device using local intent determination capabilities. The multi-modal natural language input may then be communicated to one or more of the secondary devices (e.g., when a confidence level of the intent determination at the input device falls below a given threshold). In such cases, each of the secondary devices determine an intent of the multi-modal natural language input using local intent determination capabilities. The input device collates the preliminary intent determination and the intent determinations of the secondary devices, and may arbitrate among the collated intent determinations to determine an actionable intent of the multi-modal natural input.
[0012] According to various aspects of the invention, the integrated natural language voice services environment arranged in a manner that dynamically selects between a centralized model and a distributed model. For example, the environment includes an input device that receives a multi-modal natural language input one or more secondary devices communicatively coupled to the input device, each of which have intent determination capabilities for processing multi-modal natural language inputs. A constellation model may be accessible to each of the input device and the one or more secondary devices, wherein the constellation model describes the intent determination capabilities of the input device and the one or more secondary devices. The multi-modal natural language input can be routed for processing at one or more of the input device or the secondary devices to determine an intent thereof based on the intent determination capabilities described in the constellation model. For example, when the constellation model arranges the input device and the secondary devices in the centralized manner, one of the secondary devices may be designated the central device and the natural language input may be processed as described above. However, when the multi-modal natural language cannot be communicated to the central device, the constellation model may be dynamically rearranged in the distributed manner, whereby the input device and the secondary devices share knowledge relating to respective local intent determination capabilities and operate as cooperative nodes to determine the intent of the multi-modal natural language input using the shared knowledge relating to local intent determination capabilities.
[0013] Other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent based on the following drawings and detailed description.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0014] FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary multi-modal electronic device that may be provided in an integrated, multi-device natural language voice services environment, according to various aspects of the invention.
[0015] FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary centralized implementation of the integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice service environment, according to various aspects of the invention.
[0016] FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram of an exemplary method for processing multi-modal, natural language inputs at an input device in the centralized implementation of the integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice service environment, according to various aspects of the invention.
[0017] FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of an exemplary method for processing multi-modal, natural language inputs at a central device in the centralized implementation of the integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice service environment, according to various aspects of the invention.
[0018] FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of an exemplary method for processing multi-modal, natural language inputs at a secondary device in the centralized implementation of the integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice service environment, according to various aspects of the invention.
[0019] FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary distributed implementation of the integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice service environment, according to various aspects of the invention.
[0020] FIG. 7 illustrates a flow diagram of an exemplary method for processing multi-modal, natural language inputs at an input device in the distributed implementation of the integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice service environment, according to various aspects of the invention.
Detailed Description
[0021] According to various aspects of the invention, FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary multi-modal electronic device 100 that may be provided in a natural language voice services environment that includes one or more additional multi-modal devices (e.g., as illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 6 ). As will be apparent, the electronic device 100 illustrated in FIG. 1 may be any suitable voice-enabled electronic device (e.g., a telematics device, a personal navigation device, a mobile phone, a VoIP node, a personal computer, a media device, an embedded device, a server, or another electronic device). The device 100 may include various components that collectively provide a capability to process conversational, multi-modal natural language inputs. As such, a user of the device 100 may engage in multi-modal conversational dialogues with the voice-enabled electronic device 100 to resolve requests in a free form, cooperative manner.
[0022] For example, the natural language processing components may support free form natural language utterances to liberate the user from restrictions relating to how commands, queries, or other requests should be formulated. Rather, the user may employ any manner of speaking that feels natural in order to request content or services available through the device 100 (e.g., content or services relating to telematics, communications, media, messaging, navigation, marketing, information retrieval, etc.). For instance, in various implementations, the device 100 may process natural language utterances utilizing techniques described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/452,147, entitled “Systems and Methods for Responding to Natural Language Speech Utterance,” filed Jun. 3, 2003, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/618,633, entitled “Mobile Systems and Methods for Responding to Natural Language Speech Utterance,” filed Jun. 15, 2003, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
[0023] Moreover, because the device 100 may be deployed in an integrated multi-device environment, the user may further request content or services available through other devices deployed in the environment. In particular, the integrated voice services environment may include a plurality of multi-modal devices, each of which include natural language components generally similar to those illustrated in FIG. 1 . The various devices in the environment may serve distinct purposes, however, such that available content, services, applications, or other capabilities may vary among the devices in the environment (e.g., core functions of a media device may vary from those of a personal navigation device). Thus, each device in the environment, including device 100, may have knowledge of content, services, applications, intent determination capabilities, and other features available through the other devices by way of a constellation model 130b. Accordingly, as will be described in greater detail below, the electronic device 100 may cooperate with other devices in the integrated environment to resolve requests by sharing context, prior information, domain knowledge, short-term knowledge, long-term knowledge, and cognitive models, among other things.
[0024] According to various aspects of the invention, the electronic device 100 may include an input mechanism 105 that can receive multi-modal natural language inputs, which include at least an utterance spoken by the user. As will be apparent, the input mechanism 105 may include any appropriate device or combination of devices capable of receiving a spoken input (e.g., a directional microphone, an array of microphones, or any other device that can generate encoded speech). Further, in various implementations, the input mechanism 105 can be configured to maximize fidelity of encoded speech, for example, by maximizing gain in a direction of the user, cancelling echoes, nulling point noise sources, performing variable rate sampling, or filtering environmental noise (e.g., background conversations). As such, the input mechanism 105 may generate encoded speech in a manner that can tolerate noise or other factors that could otherwise interfere with accurate interpretation of the utterance.
[0025] Furthermore, in various implementations, the input mechanism 105 may include various other input modalities (i.e., the input mechanism 105 may be arranged in a multi-modal environment), in that non-voice inputs can be correlated and/or processed in connection with one or more previous, contemporaneous, or subsequent multi-modal natural language inputs. For example, the input mechanism 105 may be coupled to a touch-screen interface, a stylus and tablet interface, a keypad or keyboard, or any other suitable input mechanism, as will be apparent. As a result, an amount of information potentially available when processing the multi-modal inputs may be maximized, as the user can clarify utterances or otherwise provide additional information in a given multi-modal natural language input using various input modalities. For instance, in an exemplary illustration, the user could touch a stylus or other pointing device to a portion of a touch-screen interface of the device 100, while also providing an utterance relating to the touched portion of the interface (e.g., “Show me restaurants around here”). In this example, the natural language utterance may be correlated with the input received via the touch-screen interface, resulting in “around here” being interpreted in relation to the touched portion of the interface (e.g., as opposed to the user's current location or some other meaning).
[0026] According to various aspects of the invention, the device 100 may include an Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 that generates one or more preliminary interpretations of the encoded speech, which may be received from the input mechanism 105. For example, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may recognize syllables, words, or phrases contained in an utterance using one or more dynamically adaptable recognition grammars. The dynamic recognition grammars may be used to recognize a stream of phonemes through phonetic dictation based on one or more acoustic models. Furthermore, as described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/197,504, entitled “Systems and Methods for Responding to Natural Language Speech Utterance,” filed Aug. 5, 2005, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may be capable of multi-pass analysis, where a primary speech recognition engine may generate a primary interpretation of an utterance (e.g., using a large list dictation grammar) and request secondary transcription from one or more secondary speech recognition engines (e.g., using a virtual dictation grammar having decoy words for out-of-vocabulary words).
[0027] Thus, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may generate preliminary interpretations of an utterance in various ways, including exclusive use of a dictation grammar or virtual dictation grammar, or use of various combinations thereof (e.g., when the device 100 supports multi-pass analysis). In any event, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may provide out-of-vocabulary capabilities and may tolerate portions of a speech signal being dropped, the user misspeaking, or other variables that may occur in natural language speech (e.g., stops and starts, stutters, etc.). Furthermore, the recognition grammars employed by the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may include vocabularies, dictionaries, syllables, words, phrases, or other information optimized according to various contextual or application-specific domains (e.g., navigation, music, movies, weather, shopping, news, languages, temporal or geographic proximities, or other suitable domains). Moreover, environmental knowledge (e.g., peer-to-peer affinities, capabilities of devices in the environment, etc.), historical knowledge (e.g., frequent requests, prior context, etc.), or other types of knowledge can be used to continually optimize the information contained in the recognition grammars on a dynamic basis.
[0028] For example, information contained in the recognition grammars may be dynamically optimized to improve a likelihood of a given utterance being recognized accurately (e.g., following an incorrect interpretation of a word, the incorrect interpretation may be removed from the grammar to reduce a likelihood of the incorrect interpretation being repeated). Accordingly, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may use a number of techniques to generate preliminary interpretations of natural language utterances, including those described, for example, in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/513,269, entitled “Dynamic Speech Sharpening,” filed Aug. 31, 2006, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Furthermore, the techniques used by the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 associated with the device 100 may be considered in defining intent determination capabilities of the device 100, and such capabilities may be shared with other devices in the environment to enable convergence of speech recognition throughout the environment (e.g., because various devices may employ distinct speech recognition techniques or have distinct grammars or vocabularies, the devices may share vocabulary translation mechanisms to enhance system-wide recognition).
[0029] According to various aspects of the invention, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may provide one or more preliminary interpretations of a multi-modal input, including an utterance contained therein, to a conversational language processor 120. The conversational language processor 120 may include various components that collectively operate to model everyday human-to-human conversations in order to engage in cooperative conversations with the user to resolve requests based on the user's intent. For example, the conversational language processor 120 may include, among other things, an intent determination engine 130a, a constellation model 130b, one or more domain agents 130c, a context tracking engine 130d, a misrecognition engine 130e, and a voice search engine 130f. Furthermore, the conversational language processor 120 may be coupled to one or more data repositories 160 and applications associated with one or more domains. Thus, the intent determination capabilities of the device 100 may be defined based on the data and processing capabilities of the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 and the conversational language processor 120.
[0030] More particularly, the intent determination engine 130a may establish meaning for a given multi-modal natural language input based on a consideration of the intent determination capabilities of the device 100 as well as the intent determination capabilities of other devices in the integrated voice services environment. For example, the intent determination capabilities of the device 100 may be defined as a function of processing resources, storage for grammars, context, agents, or other data, and content or services associated with the device 100 (e.g., a media device with a small amount of memory may have a smaller list of recognizable songs than a device with a large amount of memory). Thus, the intent determination engine 130a may determine whether to process a given input locally (e.g., when the device 100 has intent determination capabilities that suggest favorable conditions for recognition), or whether to route information associated with the input to other devices, which may assist in determining the intent of the input.
[0031] As such, to determine which device or combination of devices should process an input, the intent determination engine 130a may evaluate the constellation model 130b, which provides a model of the intent determination capabilities for each of the devices in the integrated voice services environment. For instance, the constellation model 130b may contain, among other things, knowledge of processing and storage resources available to each of the devices in the environment, as well as the nature and scope of domain agents, context, content, services, and other information available to each of the devices in the environment. As such, using the constellation model 130b, the intent determination engine 130a may be able to determine whether any of the other devices have intent determination capabilities that can be invoked to augment or otherwise enhance the intent determination capabilities of the device 100 (e.g., by routing information associated with a multi-modal natural language input to the device or devices that appear best suited to analyze the information and therefore determine an intent of the input). Accordingly, the intent determination engine 130a may establish the meaning of a given utterance by utilizing the comprehensive constellation model 130b that describes capabilities within the device 100 and across the integrated environment. The intent determination engine 130a may therefore optimize processing of a given natural language input based on capabilities throughout the environment (e.g., utterances may be processed locally to the device 100, routed to a specific device based on information in the constellation model 130b, or flooded to all of the devices in the environment in which case an arbitration may occur to select a best guess at an intent determination).
[0032] Although the following discussion will generally focus on various techniques that can be used to determine the intent of multi-modal natural language inputs in the integrated multi-device environment, it will be apparent that the natural language processing capabilities of any one of the devices may extend beyond the specific discussion that has been provided herein. As such, in addition to the co-pending U.S. patent applications referenced above, further natural language processing capabilities that may be employed include those described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/197,504, entitled “Systems and Methods for Responding to Natural Language Speech Utterance,” filed Aug. 5, 2005, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/200,164, entitled “System and Method of Supporting Adaptive Misrecognition in Conversational Speech,” filed Aug. 10, 2005, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/212,693, entitled “Mobile Systems and Methods of Supporting Natural Language Human-Machine Interactions,” filed Aug. 29, 2005, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/580,926, entitled “System and Method for a Cooperative Conversational Voice User Interface,” filed Oct. 16, 2006, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/671,526, entitled “System and Method for Selecting and Presenting Advertisements Based on Natural Language Processing of Voice-Based Input,” filed Feb. 6, 2007, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/954,064, entitled “System and Method for Providing a Natural Language Voice User Interface in an Integrated Voice Navigation Services Environment,” filed Dec. 11, 2007, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
[0033] According to various aspects of the invention, FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary centralized implementation of the integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice service environment. As will be apparent from the further description to be provided herein, the centralized implementation of the integrated, multi-device voice services environment may enable a user to engage in conversational, multi-modal natural language interactions with any one of voice-enabled devices 210a-n or central voice-enabled device 220. As such, the multi-device voice services environment may collectively determine intent for any given multi-modal natural language input, whereby the user may request content or voice services relating to any device or application in the environment, without restraint.
[0034] As illustrated in FIG. 2 , the centralized implementation of the multi-device voice service environment may include a plurality of voice-enabled devices 210a-n, each of which include various components capable of determining intent of natural language utterances, as described above in reference to FIG. 1 . Furthermore, as will be apparent, the centralized implementation includes a central device 220, which contains information relating to intent determination capabilities for each of the other voice-enabled devices 210a-n. For example, in various exemplary implementations, the central device 220 may be designated as such by virtue of being a device most capable of determining the intent of an utterance (e.g., a server, home data center, or other device having significant processing power, memory resources, and communication capabilities making the device suitable to manage intent determination across the environment). In another exemplary implementation, the central device 220 may be dynamically selected based on one or more characteristics of a given multi-modal natural language input, dialogue, or interaction (e.g., a device may be designated as the central device 220 when a current utterance relates to a specific domain).
[0035] In the centralized implementation illustrated in FIG. 2 , a multi-modal natural language input may be received at one of the voice-enabled devices 210a-n. Therefore, the receiving one of the devices 210a-n may be designated as an input device for that input, while the remaining devices 210a-n may be designated as secondary devices for that input. In other words, for any given multi-modal natural language input, the multi-device environment may include an input device that collects the input, a central device 220 that aggregates intent determination, inferencing, and processing capabilities for all of the devices 210a-n in the environment, and one or more secondary devices that may also be used in the intent determination process. As such, each device 210 in the environment may be provided with a constellation model that identifies all of the devices 210 having incoming and outgoing communication capabilities, thus indicating an extent to which other devices may be capable of determining intent for a given multi-modal natural language input. The constellation model may further define a location of the central device 220, which aggregates context, vocabularies, content, recognition grammars, misrecognitions, shared knowledge, intent determination capabilities, inferencing capabilities, and other information from the various devices 210a-n in the environment.
[0036] Accordingly, as communication and processing capabilities permit, the central device 220 may be used as a recognizer of first or last resort. For example, because the central device 220 converges intent determination capabilities across the environment (e.g., by aggregating context, vocabularies, device capabilities, and other information from the devices 210a-n in the environment), inputs may be automatically routed to the central device 220 when used as a recognizer of first resort, or as a recognizer of last resort when local processing at the input device 210 cannot determine the intent of the input with a satisfactory level of confidence. However, it will also be apparent that in certain instances the input device 210 may be unable to make contact with the central device 220 for various reasons (e.g., a network connection may be unavailable, or a processing bottleneck at the central device 220 may cause communication delays). In such cases, the input device 210 that has initiated contact with the central device 220 may shift into decentralized processing (e.g., as described in reference to FIG. 6 ) and communicate capabilities with one or more of the other devices 210a-n in the constellation model. Thus, when the central device 220 cannot be invoked for various reasons, the remaining devices 210a-n may operate as cooperative nodes to determine intent in a decentralized manner.
[0037] Additionally, in the multi-device voice services environment, the central device 220 and the various other devices 210a-n may cooperate to create a converged model of capabilities throughout the environment. For example, as indicated above, in addition to having intent determination capabilities based on processing resources, memory resources, and device capabilities, each of the devices 210a-n and the central device 220 may include various other natural language processing components. The voice services environment may therefore operate in an integrated manner by maintaining not only a complete model of data, content, and services associated with the various devices 210a-n, but also of other natural language processing capabilities and dynamic states associated with the various devices 210a-n. As such, the various devices 210a-n may operate with a goal of converging capabilities, data, states, and other information across the device, either on one device (e.g., the central device 220) or distributed among the various devices 210a-n (e.g., as in the decentralized implementation to be described in FIG. 6 ).
[0038] For example, as discussed above, each device 210 includes an Automatic Speech Recognizer, one or more dynamically adaptable recognition grammars, and vocabulary lists used to generate phonemic interpretations of natural language utterances. Moreover, each device 210 includes locally established context, which can range from information contained in a context stack, context and namespace variables, vocabulary translation mechanisms, short-term shared knowledge relating to a current dialogue or conversational interaction, long-term shared knowledge relating to a user's learned preferences over time, or other contextual information. Furthermore, each device 210 may have various services or applications associated therewith, and may perform various aspects of natural language processing locally. Thus, additional information to be converged throughout the environment may include partial or preliminary utterance recognitions, misrecognitions or ambiguous recognitions, inferencing capabilities, and overall device state information (e.g., songs playing in the environment, alarms set in the environment, etc.).
[0039] Thus, various data synchronization and referential integrity algorithms may be employed in concert by the various devices 210a-n and the central device 220 to provide a consistent worldview of the environment. For example, information may be described and transmitted throughout the environment for synchronization and convergence purposes using the Universal Plug and Play protocol designed for computer ancillary devices, although the environment can also operate in a peer-to-peer disconnected mode (e.g., when the central device 220 cannot be reached). However, in various implementations, the environment may also operate in a peer-to-peer mode regardless of the disconnected status, as illustrated in FIG. 6 , for example, when the devices 210a-n have sufficient commensurate resources and capabilities for natural language processing.
[0040] In general, the algorithms for convergence in the environment can be executed at various intervals, although it may be desirable to limit data transmission so as to avoid processing bottlenecks. For example, because the convergence and synchronization techniques relate to natural language processing, in which any given utterance will typically be expressed over a course of several seconds, information relating to context and vocabulary need not be updated on a time frame of less than a few seconds. However, as communication capabilities permit, context and vocabulary could be updated more frequently to provide real-time recognition or the appearance of real-time recognition. In another implementation, the convergence and synchronization may be permitted to run until completion (e.g., when no requests are currently pending), or the convergence and synchronization may be suspended or terminated when a predetermined time or resource consumption limit has been reached (e.g., when the convergence relates to a pending request, an intent determination having a highest confidence level at the time of cut-off may be used).
[0041] By establishing a consistent view of capabilities, data, states, and other information throughout the environment, an input device 210 may cooperate with the central device 220 and one or more secondary devices (i.e., one or more of devices 210a-n, other than the input device) in processing any given multi-modal natural language input. Furthermore, by providing each device 210 and the central device 220 with a constellation model that describes a synchronized state of the environment, the environment may be tolerant of failure by one or more of the devices 210a-n, or of the central device 220. For example, if the input device 210 cannot communicate with the central device 220 (e.g., because of a server crash), the input device 210 may enter a disconnected peer-to-peer mode, whereby capabilities can be exchanged with one or more devices 210a-n with which communications remain available. To that end, when a device 210 establishes new information relating to vocabulary, context, misrecognitions, agent adaptation, intent determination capabilities, inferencing capabilities, or otherwise, the device 210 may transmit the information to the central device 220 for convergence purposes, as discussed above, in addition to consulting the constellation model to determine whether the information should be transmitted to one or more of the other devices 210a-n.
[0042] For example, suppose the environment includes a voice-enabled mobile phone that has nominal functionality relating to playing music or other media, and which further has a limited amount of local storage space, while the environment further includes a voice-enabled home media system that includes a mass storage medium that provides dedicated media functionality. If the mobile phone were to establish new vocabulary, context, or other information relating to a song (e.g., a user downloads the song or a ringtone to the mobile phone while on the road), the mobile phone may transmit the newly established information to the home media system in addition to the central device 220. As such, by having a model of all of the devices 210a-n in the environment and transmitting new information to the devices where it will most likely be useful, the various devices may handle disconnected modes of operation when the central device 220 may be unavailable for any reason, while resources may be allocated efficiently throughout the environment.
[0043] Thus, based on the foregoing discussion, it will be apparent that a centralized implementation of an integrated multi-device voice services environment may generally include a central device 220 operable to aggregate or converge knowledge relating to content, services, capabilities, and other information associated with various voice-enabled devices 210a-n deployed within the environment. In such centralized implementations, the central device 220 may be invoked as a recognizer of first or last resort, as will be described in greater detail with reference to FIGS. 3-5 , and furthermore, the other devices 210a-n in the environment may be configured to automatically enter a disconnected or peer-to-peer mode of operation when the central device 220 cannot be invoked for any reason (i.e., devices may enter a decentralized or distributed mode, as will be described in greater detail with reference to FIGS. 6-7 ). Knowledge and capabilities of each of the devices 210a-n may therefore be made available throughout the voice services environment in a centralized manner, a distributed manner, or various combinations thereof, thus optimizing an amount of natural language processing resources used to determine an intent of any given multi-modal natural language input.
[0044] According to various aspects of the invention, FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram of an exemplary method for processing multi-modal, natural language inputs at an input device in the centralized implementation of the integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice service environment. Similarly, FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate corresponding methods associated with a central device and one or more secondary devices, respectively, in the centralized voice service environment. Furthermore, it will be apparent that the processing techniques described in relation to FIGS. 3-5 may generally be based on the centralized implementation illustrated in FIG. 2 and described above, whereby the input device may be assumed to be distinct from the central device, and the one or more secondary devices may be assumed to be distinct from the central device and the input device. However, it will be apparent that various instances may involve a natural language input being received at the central device or at another device, in which case the techniques described in FIGS. 3-5 may be vary depending on circumstances of the environment (e.g., decisions relating to routing utterances to a specific device or devices may be made locally, collaboratively, or in other ways depending on various factors, such as overall system state, communication capabilities, intent determination capabilities, or otherwise).
[0045] As illustrated in FIG. 3 , a multi-modal natural language input may be received at an input device in an operation 310. The multi-modal input may include at least a natural language utterance provided by a user, and may further include other input modalities such as audio, text, button presses, gestures, or other non-voice inputs. It will also be apparent that prior to receiving the natural language input in operation 310, the input device may be configured to establish natural language processing capabilities. For example, establishing natural language processing capabilities may include, among other things, loading an Automatic Speech Recognizer and any associated recognition grammars, launching a conversational language processor to handle dialogues with the user, and installing one or more domain agents that provide functionality for respective application domains or contextual domains (e.g., navigation, music, movies, weather, information retrieval, device control, etc.).
[0046] The input device may also be configured to coordinate synchronization of intent determination capabilities, shared knowledge, and other information with the central device and the secondary devices in the environment prior to receiving the input at operation 310. For example, when the input device installs a domain agent, the installed domain agent may bootstrap context variables, semantics, namespace variables, criteria values, and other context related to that agent from other devices in the system. Similarly, misrecognitions may be received from the central device and the secondary devices in order to enable correction of agents that use information relevant to the received misrecognitions, and vocabularies and associated translation mechanisms may be synchronized among the devices to account for potential variations between the Automatic Speech Recognizers used by the various devices (e.g., each device in the environment cannot be guaranteed to use the same Automatic Speech Recognizer or recognition grammars, necessitating vocabulary and translation mechanisms to be shared among the devices that share intent determination capabilities).
[0047] Upon establishing and synchronizing natural language processing capabilities and subsequently receiving a multi-modal natural language input in operation 310, the input device may determine whether the environment has been set up to automatically transmit the input to the central device in a decisional operation 320. In such a case, processing proceeds to an operation 360 for transmitting the input to the central device, which may then process the input according to techniques to be described in relation to FIG. 4 . If the environment has not been set up to automatically communicate the input to the central device, however, processing proceeds to an operation 330, where the input device performs transcription of the natural language utterance contained in the multi-modal input. For example, the input device may transcribe the utterance using the Automatic Speech Recognizer and recognition grammars associated therewith according to techniques described above and in the above-referenced U.S. patent applications.
[0048] Subsequently, in an operation 340, an intent of the multi-modal natural language input may be determined at the input device using local natural language processing capabilities and resources. For example, any non-voice input modalities included in the input may be merged with the utterance transcription and a conversational language processor associated with the input device may utilize local information relating to context, domain knowledge, shared knowledge, context variables, criteria values, or other information useful in natural language processing. As such, the input device may attempt to determine a best guess as to an intent of the user that provided the input, such as identifying a conversation type (e.g., query, didactic, or exploratory) or request that may be contained in the input (e.g., a command or query relating to one or more domain agents or application domains).
[0049] The intent determination of the input device may be assigned a confidence level (e.g., a device having an Automatic Speech Recognizer that implements multi-pass analysis may assign comparatively higher confidence levels to utterance transcriptions created thereby, which may result in a higher confidence level for the intent determination). The confidence level may be assigned based on various factors, as described in the above-referenced U.S. patent applications. As such, a decisional operation 350 may include determining whether the intent determination of the input device meets an acceptable level of confidence. When the intent determination meets the acceptable level confidence, processing may proceed directly to an operation 380 where action may be taken in response thereto. For example, when the intent determination indicates that the user has requested certain information, one or more queries may be formulated to retrieve the information from appropriate information sources, which may include one or more of the other devices. In another example, when the intent determination indicates that the user has requested a given command (e.g., to control a specific device), the command may be routed to the appropriate device for execution.
[0050] Thus, in cases where the input device can determine the intent of a natural language input without assistance from the central device or the secondary devices, communications and processing resources may be conserved by taking immediate action as may be appropriate. On the other hand, when the intent determination of the input device does not meet the acceptable level of confidence, decisional operation 350 may result in the input device requesting assistance from the central device in operation 360. In such a case, the multi-modal natural language input may be communicated to the central device in its entirety, whereby the central device processes the input according to techniques described in FIG. 4 . However, should transmission to the central device fail for some reason, the input device may shift into a disconnected peer-to-peer mode where one or more secondary devices may be utilized, as will be described below in relation to FIG. 7 . When transmission to the central device occurs without incident, however, the input device may receive an intent determination from the central device in an operation 370, and may further receive results of one or more requests that the central device was able to resolve, or requests that the central device has formulated for further processing on the input device. As such, the input device may take action in operation 380 based on the information received from the central device in operation 370. For example, the input device may route queries or commands to local or remote information sources or devices based on the intent determination, or may present results of the requests processed by the central device to the user.
[0051] Referring to FIG. 4 , the central device may receive the multi-modal natural language input from the input device in an operation 410. The central device, having aggregated context and other knowledge from throughout the environment, may thus transcribe the utterance in an operation 420 and determine an intent of the input from the transcribed utterance in an operation 430. As such, the central device may consider information relating to context, domain agents, applications, and device capabilities throughout the environment in determining the intent of the utterance, including identification of one or more domains relevant to the input. However, it will be apparent that utilizing information aggregated from throughout the environment may cause ambiguity or uncertainty in various instances (e.g., an utterance containing the word “traffic” may have a different intent in domains relating to movies, music, and navigation).
[0052] As such, once the central device has attempted to determine the intent of the natural language input, a determination may be made in an operation 440 as to whether one or more secondary devices (i.e., other devices in the constellation besides the input device) may also be capable of intent determination in the identified domain or domains. When no such secondary devices can be identified, decisional operation 440 may branch directly to an operation 480 to send to the input device the determined intent and any commands, queries, or other requests identified from the determined intent.
[0053] On the other hand, when one or more secondary devices in the environment have intent determination capabilities in the identified domain or domains, the natural language input may be sent to such secondary devices in an operation 450. The secondary devices may then determine an intent as illustrated in FIG. 5 , which may include techniques generally similar to those described above in relation to the input device and central device (i.e., the natural language input may be received in an operation 510, an utterance contained therein may be transcribed in an operation 520, and an intent determination made in an operation 530 may be returned to the central device in an operation 540).
[0054] Returning to FIG. 4 , the central device may collate intent determination responses received from the secondary devices in an operation 460. For example, as indicated above, the central device may identify one or more secondary devices capable of determining intent in a domain that the central device has identified as being relevant to the natural language utterance. As will be apparent, the secondary devices invoked in operation 450 may often include a plurality of devices, and intent determination responses may be received from the secondary devices in an interleaved manner, depending on processing resources, communications throughput, or other factors (e.g., the secondary devices may include a telematics device having a large amount of processing power and a broadband network connection and an embedded mobile phone having less processing power and only a cellular connection, in which case the telematics device may be highly likely to provide results to the central device before the embedded mobile phone). Thus, based on potential variations in response time of secondary devices, the central device may be configured to place constraints on collating operation 460. For example, the collating operation 460 may be terminated as soon as an intent determination has been received from one of the secondary devices that meets an acceptable level of confidence, or the operation 460 may be cut off when a predetermined amount of time has lapsed or a predetermined amount of resources have been consumed. In other implementations, however, it will be apparent that collating operation 460 may be configured to run to completion, regardless of whether delays have occurred or suitable intent determinations have been received. Further, it will be apparent that various criteria may be used to determine whether or when to end the collating operation 460, including the nature of a given natural language input, dialogue, or other interaction, or system or user preferences, among other criteria, as will be apparent.
[0055] In any event, when the collating operation 460 has completed, a subsequent operation 470 may include the central device arbitrating among the intent determination responses received from one or more of the secondary devices previously invoked in operation 450. For example, each of the invoked secondary devices that generate an intent determination may also assign a confidence level to that intent determination, and the central device may consider the confidence levels in arbitrating among the responses. Moreover, the central device may associate other criteria with the secondary devices or the intent determinations received from the secondary devices to further enhance a likelihood that the best intent determination will be used. For example, various ones of the secondary devices may only be invoked for partial recognition in distinct domains, and the central device may aggregate and arbitrate the partial recognitions to create a complete transcription. In another example, a plurality of secondary devices may be invoked to perform overlapping intent determination, and the central device may consider capabilities of the secondary devices to weigh the respective confidence levels (e.g., when one of two otherwise identical secondary devices employs multi-pass speech recognition analysis, the secondary device employing the multi-pass speech recognition analysis may be weighed as having a higher likelihood of success). It will be apparent that the central device may be configured to arbitrate and select one intent determination from among all of the intent hypotheses, which may include the intent determination hypothesis generated by the central device in operation 430. Upon selecting the best intent determination hypothesis, the central device may then provide that intent determination to the input device in operation 480, as well as any commands, queries, or other requests that may be relevant thereto. The input device may then take appropriate action as described above in relation to FIG. 3 .
[0056] According to various aspects of the invention, FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary distributed implementation of the integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice service environment. As described above, the distributed implementation may also be categorized as a disconnected or peer-to-peer mode that may be employed when a central device in a centralized implementation cannot be reached or otherwise does not meet the needs of the environment. The distributed implementation illustrated in FIG. 6 may be generally operate with similar purposes as described above in relation to the centralized implementation (i.e., to ensure that the environment includes a comprehensive model of aggregate knowledge and capabilities of a plurality of devices 610a-n in the environment). Nonetheless, the distributed implementation may operate in a somewhat different manner, in that one or more of the devices 610a-n may be provided with the entire constellation model, or various aspects of the model may be distributed among the plurality of devices 610a-n, or various combinations thereof.
[0057] Generally speaking, the plurality of voice-enabled devices 610a- may be coupled to one another by a voice services interface 630, which may include any suitable real or virtual interface (e.g., a common message bus or network interface, a service-oriented abstraction layer, etc.). The various devices 610a-n may therefore operate as cooperative nodes in determining intent for multi-modal natural language utterances received by any one of the devices 610. Furthermore, the devices 610a-n may share knowledge of vocabularies, context, capabilities, and other information, while certain forms of data may be synchronized to ensure consistent processing among the devices 610a-n. For example, because natural language processing components used in the devices 610a-n may vary (e.g., different recognition grammars or speech recognition techniques may exist), vocabulary translation mechanisms, misrecognitions, context variables, criteria values, criteria handlers, and other such information used in the intent determination process should be synchronized to the extent that communication capabilities permit.
[0058] By sharing intent determination capabilities, device capabilities, inferencing capabilities, domain knowledge, and other information, decisions as to routing an utterance to a specific one of the devices 610a-n may be made locally (e.g., at an input device), collaboratively (e.g., a device having particular capabilities relevant to the utterance may communicate a request to process the utterance), or various combinations thereof (e.g., the input device may consider routing to secondary devices only when an intent of the utterance cannot be determined). Similarly, partial recognition performed at one or more of the devices 610a-n may be used to determine routing strategies for further intent determination of the utterance. For example, an utterance that contains a plurality of requests relating to a plurality of different domains may be received at an input device that can only determine intent in one of the domains. In this example, the input device may perform partial recognition for the domain associated with the input device, and the partial recognition may also identify the other domains relevant to the utterance for which the input device does not have sufficient recognition information. Thus, the partial recognition performed by the input device may result in identification of other potentially relevant domains and a strategy may be formulated to route the utterance to other devices in the environment that include recognition information for those domains.
[0059] As a result, multi-modal natural language inputs, including natural language utterances, may be routed among the various devices 610a-n in order to perform intent determination in a distributed manner. However, as the capabilities and knowledge held by any one of the devices 610a-n may vary, each of the devices 610a-n may be associated with a reliability factor for intent determinations generated by the respective devices 610a-n. As such, to ensure that final intent determinations can be relied upon with a sufficient level of confidence, knowledge may be distributed among the devices 610a-n to ensure that reliability metrics for intent determinations provided by each of the devices 610a-n are commensurable throughout the environment. For example, additional knowledge may be provided to a device having a low intent determination reliability, even when such knowledge results in redundancy in the environment, to ensure commensurate reliability of intent determination environment-wide.
[0060] Therefore, in distributed implementations of the integrated voice services environment, utterances may be processed in various ways, which may depend on circumstances at a given time (e.g., system states, system or user preferences, etc.). For example, an utterance may be processed locally at an input device and only routed to secondary devices when an intent determination confidence level falls below a given threshold. In another example, utterances may be routed to a specific device based on the modeling of knowledge and capabilities discussed above. In yet another example, utterances may be flooded among all of the devices in the environment, and arbitration may occur whereby intent determinations may be collated and arbitrated to determine a best guess at intent determination.
[0061] Thus, utterances may be processed in various ways, including through local techniques, centralized techniques, distributed techniques, and various combinations thereof. Although many variations will be apparent, FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary method for combined local and distributed processing of multi-modal, natural language inputs in a distributed implementation of the voice service environment, according to various aspects of the invention. In particular, the distributed processing may begin in an operation 710, where a multi-modal natural language input may be received at an input device. The input device may then utilize various natural language processing capabilities associated therewith in an operation 720 to transcribe an utterance contained in the multi-modal input (e.g., using an Automatic Speech Recognizer and associated recognition grammars), and may subsequently determine a preliminary intent of the multi-modal natural language input in an operation 730. It will be apparent that operations 710 through 730 may generally be performed using local intent determination capabilities associated with the input device.
[0062] Thereafter, the input device may invoke intent determination capabilities of one or more secondary devices in an operation 740. More particularly, the input device may provide information associated with the multi-modal natural language input to one or more of the secondary devices, which may utilize local intent determination capabilities to attempt to determine intent of the input using techniques as described in relation to FIG. 5 . It will also be apparent that, in various implementations, the secondary devices invoked in operation 740 may include only devices having intent determination capabilities associated with a specific domain identified as being associated with the input. In any event, the input device may receive intent determinations from the invoked secondary devices in an operation 750, and the input device may then collate the intent determinations received from the secondary devices. The input device may then arbitrate among the various intent determinations, or may combine various ones of the intent determinations (e.g., when distinct secondary devices determine intent in distinct domains), or otherwise arbitrate among the intent determinations to determine a best guess at the intent of the multi-modal natural language input (e.g., based on confidence levels associated with the various intent determinations). Based on the determined intent, the input device may then take appropriate action in an operation 770, such as issuing one or more commands, queries, or other requests to be executed at one or more of the input device or the secondary devices.
[0063] Furthermore, in addition to the exemplary implementations described above, various implementations may include a continuous listening mode of operation where a plurality of devices may continuously listen for multi-modal voice-based inputs. In the continuous listening mode, each of the devices in the environment may be triggered to accept a multi-modal input when one or more predetermined events occur. For example, the devices may each be associated with one or more attention words, such as “Phone, <multi-modal request>” for a mobile phone, or “Computer, <multi-modal request>” for a personal computer. When one or more of the devices in the environment recognize the associated attention word, keyword activation may result, where the associated devices trigger to accept the subsequent multi-modal request. Further, where a plurality of devices in a constellation may be listening, the constellation may use all available inputs to increase recognition rates.
[0064] Moreover, it will be apparent that the continuous listening mode may be applied in centralized voice service environments, distributed centralized voice service environments, or various combinations thereof. For example, when each device in the constellation has a different attention word, any given device that recognizes an attention word may consult a constellation model to determine a target device or functionality associated with the attention word. In another example, when a plurality of devices in the constellation share one or more attention words, the plurality of devices may coordinate with one another to synchronize information for processing the multi-modal input, such as a start time for an utterance contained therein.
[0065] Implementations of the invention may be made in hardware, firmware, software, or various combinations thereof. The invention may also be implemented as instructions stored on a machine-readable medium, which may be read and executed by one or more processors. A machine-readable medium may include various mechanisms for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computing device). For example, a machine-readable storage medium may include read only memory, random access memory, magnetic disk storage media, optical storage media, flash memory devices, and others, and a machine-readable transmission media may include forms of propagated signals, such as carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, and others. Further, firmware, software, routines, or instructions may be described in the above disclosure in terms of specific exemplary aspects and implementations of the invention, and performing certain actions. However, it will be apparent that such descriptions are merely for convenience and that such actions in fact result from computing devices, processors, controllers, or other devices executing the firmware, software, routines, or instructions.
[0066] Aspects and implementations may be described as including a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every aspect or implementation may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic has been described in connection with an aspect or implementation, it will be understood that such feature, structure, or characteristic may be included in connection with other aspects or implementations, whether or not explicitly described. Thus, various changes and modifications may be made to the preceding description without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention, and the specification and drawings should therefore be regarded as exemplary only, and the scope of the invention determined solely by the appended claims.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method of processing natural language utterances, the method being implemented by a first device that comprises one or more physical processors executing one or more computer program instructions which, when executed, perform the method, the method comprising:
receiving, by the first device, a natural language utterance spoken by a user;
performing, by the first device, speech recognition to determine one or more words of the natural language utterance;
determining, by the first device, based on the one or more words, a first prediction of an intent of the user and a domain relating to the natural language utterance;
determining, by the first device, processing capabilities associated with a plurality of devices, wherein the plurality of devices comprises a second device;
selecting, by the first device, based on the processing capabilities associated with the second device and the domain, the second device to determine the second prediction;
transmitting, by the first device, the natural language utterance to the second device based on the selection;
receiving, from the second device by the first device, a second prediction of the intent of the user; and
determining, by the first device, the intent of the user based on the first prediction and the second prediction.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the processing capabilities associated with the plurality of devices comprise processing power, storage resources, information, or services available at individual ones of the plurality of devices.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of devices are associated with different domains, the second device is associated with the domain, and the different domains comprise the domain.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
determining, by the first device, whether a prediction of the intent of the user is to be obtained from at least one other device,
wherein transmitting the natural language utterance comprises transmitting the natural language utterance to the second device based on a determination that a prediction of the intent of the user is to be obtained from at least one other device.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising:
determining, by the first device, a confidence level associated with the first prediction; and
determining, by the first device, whether the confident level satisfies a threshold level of confidence relating to intent prediction accuracy,
wherein the determination that a prediction of the intent of the user is to be obtained from at least one other device is based on a determination that the confidence level does not satisfy the threshold level of confidence.
6. A method of processing natural language utterances, the method being implemented by a first device that comprises one or more physical processors executing one or more computer program instructions which, when executed, perform the method, the method comprising:
receiving, by the first device, a natural language utterance spoken by a user;
performing, by the first device, speech recognition to determine one or more words of the natural language utterance;
determining, by the first device, based on the one or more words, a first prediction of an intent of the user;
transmitting, by the first device, the natural language utterance to a second device;
receiving, from the second device by the first device, a second prediction of the intent of the user;
transmitting, by the first device, the natural language utterance to a third device;
receiving, from the third device by the first device, a third prediction of the intent of the user;
receiving, from the second device by the first device, information regarding a second confidence level associated with the second prediction;
receiving, from the third device by the first device, information regarding a third confidence level associated with the third prediction;
comparing, by the first device, the second and third confidence levels with one another; and
determining, by the first device, the intent of the user based on the first prediction, the second prediction, the third prediction, and the comparison.
7. The method of claim 6, further comprising:
determining, by the first device, processing capabilities associated with the second device and processing capabilities associated with the third device,
wherein determining the intent comprises determining the intent based on the comparison and the processing capabilities associated with the second and third devices.
8. A method of processing natural language utterances, the method being implemented by a first device that comprises one or more physical processors executing one or more computer program instructions which, when executed, perform the method, the method comprising:
receiving, by the first device, a natural language utterance spoken by a user;
performing, by the first device, speech recognition to determine one or more words of the natural language utterance;
determining, by the first device, based on the one or more words, a first prediction of an intent of the user;
determining, by the first device, a first confidence level associated with the first prediction;
transmitting, by the first device, the natural language utterance to a second device;
receiving, from the second device by the first device, a second prediction of the intent of the user;
receiving, from the second device by the first device, information regarding a second confidence level associated with the second prediction;
determining, by the first device, a highest confidence level among the first confidence level, the second confidence level, and one or more other confidence levels associated with one or more other predictions of the intent of the user, wherein the one or more other predictions are received from one or more other devices; and
determining, by the first device, the intent of the user based on the first prediction and the second prediction, wherein determining the intent comprises selecting, from the first prediction, the second prediction, and the one or more other predictions, a prediction of the intent of the user that is associated with the highest confidence level.
9. A method of processing natural language utterances, the method being implemented by a first device that comprises one or more physical processors executing one or more computer program instructions which, when executed, perform the method, the method comprising:
receiving, by the first device, a natural language utterance spoken by a user, wherein the first device comprises an input device at which the natural language utterance is initially received from the user;
performing, by the first device, speech recognition to determine one or more words of the natural language utterance;
determining, by the first device, based on the one or more words, a first prediction of an intent of the user;
determining, by the first device, whether a third device is available to manage determination of the intent of the user;
transmitting, by the first device, the natural language utterance to a second device, wherein transmitting the natural language utterance comprises transmitting the natural language utterance to the second device based on a determination that the third device is not available to manage determination of the intent of the user;
receiving, from the second device by the first device, a second prediction of the intent of the user; and
determining, by the first device, the intent of the user based on the first prediction and the second prediction.
10. The method of claim 9, further comprising:
transmitting, by the first device, a request to a plurality of devices for information regarding processing capabilities associated with the plurality of devices based on a determination that the third device is not available to manage determination of the intent, wherein the plurality of devices comprise the second device;
receiving, by the first device, information regarding the processing capabilities; and
selecting, by the first device based on the processing capabilities, the second device to determine the second prediction,
wherein transmitting the natural language utterance comprises transmitting the natural language utterance to the second device based on the selection.
11. A system for processing natural language utterances, the system comprising:
a first device having one or more physical processors programmed to execute one or more computer program instructions which, when executed, cause the one or more physical processors to:
receive a natural language utterance spoken by a user;
perform speech recognition to determine one or more words of the natural language utterance;
determine, based on the one or more words, a first prediction of an intent of the user and a domain relating to the natural language utterance;
determine processing capabilities associated with a plurality of devices, wherein the plurality of devices comprises the second device;
select, based on the processing capabilities associated with the second device and the domain, the second device to determine the second prediction;
transmit the natural language utterance to a second device based on the selection;
receive, from the second device, a second prediction of the intent of the user; and
determine the intent of the user based on the first prediction and the second prediction.
12. The system of claim 11, wherein the processing capabilities associated with the plurality of devices comprise processing power, storage resources, information, or services available at individual ones of the plurality of devices.
13. The system of claim 11, wherein the plurality of devices are associated with different domains, the second device is associated with the domain, and the different domains comprise the domain.
14. The system of claim 11, wherein the one or more physical processors are further caused to:
determine whether a prediction of the intent of the user is to be obtained from at least one other device,
wherein transmitting the natural language utterance comprises transmitting the natural language utterance to the second device based on a determination that a prediction of the intent of the user is to be obtained from at least one other device.
15. The system of claim 14, wherein the one or more physical processors are further caused to:
determine a confidence level associated with the first prediction; and
determine whether the confident level satisfies a threshold level of confidence relating to intent prediction accuracy,
wherein the determination that a prediction of the intent of the user is to be obtained from at least one other device is based on a determination that the confidence level does not satisfy the threshold level of confidence.
16. A system for processing natural language utterances, the system comprising:
a first device having one or more physical processors programmed to execute one or more computer program instructions which, when executed, cause the one or more physical processors to:
receive a natural language utterance spoken by a user;
perform speech recognition to determine one or more words of the natural language utterance;
determine, based on the one or more words, a first prediction of an intent of the user;
transmit the natural language utterance to a second device;
receive, from the second device, a second prediction of the intent of the user;
transmit the natural language utterance to a third device;
receive, from the third device, a third prediction of the intent of the user;
receive, from the second device, information regarding a second confidence level associated with the second prediction;
receive, from the third device, information regarding a third confidence level associated with the third prediction;
compare, by the first device, the second and third confidence levels with one another; and
determine the intent of the user based on the first prediction, the second prediction, the third prediction, and the comparison.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein the one or more physical processors are further caused to:
determine processing capabilities associated with the second device and processing capabilities associated with the third device,
wherein determining the intent comprises determining the intent based on the comparison and the processing capabilities associated with the second and third devices.
18. A system for processing natural language utterances, the system comprising:
a first device having one or more physical processors programmed to execute one or more computer program instructions which, when executed, cause the one or more physical processors to:
receive a natural language utterance spoken by a user;
perform speech recognition to determine one or more words of the natural language utterance;
determine, based on the one or more words, a first prediction of an intent of the user;
determine a first confidence level associated with the first prediction;
transmit the natural language utterance to a second device;
receive, from the second device, a second prediction of the intent of the user;
receive, from the second device, information regarding a second confidence level associated with the second prediction;
determine a highest confidence level among the first confidence level, the second confidence level, and one or more other confidence levels associated with one or more other predictions of the intent of the user, wherein the one or more other predictions are received from one or more other devices; and
determine the intent of the user based on the first prediction and the second prediction, wherein determining the intent comprises selecting, from the first prediction, the second prediction, and the one or more other predictions, a prediction of the intent of the user that is associated with the highest confidence level.
19. A system for processing natural language utterances, the system comprising:
a first device having one or more physical processors programmed to execute one or more computer program instructions which, when executed, cause the one or more physical processors to:
receive a natural language utterance spoken by a user, wherein the first device comprises an input device at which the natural language utterance is initially received from the user;
perform speech recognition to determine one or more words of the natural language utterance;
determine, based on the one or more words, a first prediction of an intent of the user;
determine whether a third device is available to manage determination of the intent of the user;
transmit a request to a plurality of devices for information regarding processing capabilities associated with the plurality of devices based on a determination that the third device is not available to manage determination of the intent, wherein the plurality of devices comprise the second device;
receive information regarding the processing capabilities;
select, based on the processing capabilities, the second device to determine the second prediction;
transmit the natural language utterance to a second device, wherein transmitting the natural language utterance comprises transmitting the natural language utterance to the second device based on the selection;
receive, from the second device, a second prediction of the intent of the user; and
determine the intent of the user based on the first prediction and the second prediction.
Patent Citations (773)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4430669(A) | 1984-02-01 | Cheung | Applicant |
| US4821027(A) | 1989-04-01 | Mallory | Applicant |
| US4829423(A) | 1989-05-01 | Tennant | Applicant |
| US4887212(A) | 1989-12-01 | Zamora et al. | Examiner |
| US4910784(A) | 1990-03-01 | Doddington | Applicant |
| US5027406(A) | 1991-06-01 | Roberts | Applicant |
| US5155743(A) | 1992-10-01 | Jacobs | Applicant |
| US5164904(A) | 1992-11-01 | Sumner | Applicant |
| US5208748(A) | 1993-05-01 | Flores | Applicant |
| US5265065(A) | 1993-11-01 | Turtle | Applicant |
| US5274560(A) | 1993-12-01 | LaRue | Applicant |
| US5357596(A) | 1994-10-01 | Takebayashi | Applicant |
| US5369575(A) | 1994-11-01 | Lamberti | Applicant |
| US5377350(A) | 1994-12-01 | Skinner | Applicant |
| US5386556(A) | 1995-01-01 | Hedin | Applicant |
| US5424947(A) | 1995-06-01 | Nagao | Applicant |
| US5471318(A) | 1995-11-01 | Ahuja | Applicant |
| US5475733(A) | 1995-12-01 | Eisdorfer | Applicant |
| US5479563(A) | 1995-12-01 | Yamaguchi | Examiner |
| US5488652(A) | 1996-01-01 | Bielby | Applicant |
| US5499289(A) | 1996-03-01 | Bruno | Applicant |
| US5500920(A) | 1996-03-01 | Kupiec | Applicant |
| US5517560(A) | 1996-05-01 | Greenspan | Applicant |
| US5533108(A) | 1996-07-01 | Harris | Applicant |
| US5537436(A) | 1996-07-01 | Bottoms | Applicant |
| US5539744(A) | 1996-07-01 | Chu | Applicant |
| US5557667(A) | 1996-09-01 | Bruno | Applicant |
| US5559864(A) | 1996-09-01 | Kennedy, Jr. | Applicant |
| US5563937(A) | 1996-10-01 | Bruno | Applicant |
| US5577165(A) | 1996-11-01 | Takebayashi | Applicant |
| US5590039(A) | 1996-12-01 | Ikeda | Applicant |
| US5608635(A) | 1997-03-01 | Tamai | Applicant |
| US5617407(A) | 1997-04-01 | Bareis | Applicant |
| US5633922(A) | 1997-05-01 | August | Applicant |
| US5634086(A) | 1997-05-01 | Rtischev | Applicant |
| US5652570(A) | 1997-07-01 | Lepkofker | Applicant |
| US5675629(A) | 1997-10-01 | Raffel | Applicant |
| US5696965(A) | 1997-12-01 | Dedrick | Applicant |
| US5708422(A) | 1998-01-01 | Blonder | Applicant |
| US5721938(A) | 1998-02-01 | Stuckey | Applicant |
| US5722084(A) | 1998-02-01 | Chakrin | Applicant |
| US5740256(A) | 1998-04-01 | CastelloDaCosta | Applicant |
| US5742763(A) | 1998-04-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US5748841(A) | 1998-05-01 | Morin | Applicant |
| US5748974(A) | 1998-05-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US5752052(A) | 1998-05-01 | Richardson | Applicant |
| US5754784(A) | 1998-05-01 | Garland | Applicant |
| US5761631(A) | 1998-06-01 | Nasukawa | Applicant |
| US5774841(A) | 1998-06-01 | Salazar | Applicant |
| US5774859(A) | 1998-06-01 | Houser | Applicant |
| US5794050(A) | 1998-08-01 | Dahlgren | Applicant |
| US5794196(A) | 1998-08-01 | Yegnanarayanan | Applicant |
| US5797112(A) | 1998-08-01 | Komatsu | Applicant |
| US5799276(A) | 1998-08-01 | Komissarchik | Applicant |
| US5802510(A) | 1998-09-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US5829000(A) | 1998-10-01 | Huang | Applicant |
| US5832221(A) | 1998-11-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US5839107(A) | 1998-11-01 | Gupta | Applicant |
| US5848396(A) | 1998-12-01 | Gerace | Applicant |
| US5855000(A) | 1998-12-01 | Waibel | Applicant |
| US5867817(A) | 1999-02-01 | Catallo | Applicant |
| US5878385(A) | 1999-03-01 | Bralich | Applicant |
| US5878386(A) | 1999-03-01 | Coughlin | Applicant |
| US5892813(A) | 1999-04-01 | Morin | Applicant |
| US5892900(A) | 1999-04-01 | Ginter | Applicant |
| US5895464(A) | 1999-04-01 | Bhandari | Applicant |
| US5895466(A) | 1999-04-01 | Goldberg | Applicant |
| US5897613(A) | 1999-04-01 | Chan | Applicant |
| US5902347(A) | 1999-05-01 | Backman | Applicant |
| US5911120(A) | 1999-06-01 | Jarett | Applicant |
| US5918222(A) | 1999-06-01 | Fukui | Applicant |
| US5926784(A) | 1999-07-01 | Richardson | Applicant |
| US5933822(A) | 1999-08-01 | Braden-Harder | Applicant |
| US5950167(A) | 1999-09-01 | Yaker | Applicant |
| US5953393(A) | 1999-09-01 | Culbreth | Applicant |
| US5960397(A) | 1999-09-01 | Rahim | Applicant |
| US5960399(A) | 1999-09-01 | Barclay | Applicant |
| US5960447(A) | 1999-09-01 | Holt | Applicant |
| US5963894(A) | 1999-10-01 | Richardson | Applicant |
| US5963940(A) | 1999-10-01 | Liddy | Applicant |
| US5987404(A) | 1999-11-01 | DellaPietra | Applicant |
| US5991721(A) | 1999-11-01 | Asano | Applicant |
| US5995119(A) | 1999-11-01 | Cosatto | Applicant |
| US5995928(A) | 1999-11-01 | Nguyen | Applicant |
| US5995943(A) | 1999-11-01 | Bull | Applicant |
| US6009382(A) | 1999-12-01 | Martino | Applicant |
| US6014559(A) | 2000-01-01 | Amin | Applicant |
| US6018708(A) | 2000-01-01 | Dahan | Applicant |
| US6021384(A) | 2000-02-01 | Gorin | Applicant |
| US6028514(A) | 2000-02-01 | Lemelson | Applicant |
| US6035267(A) | 2000-03-01 | Watanabe | Applicant |
| US6044347(A) | 2000-03-01 | Abella | Applicant |
| US6049602(A) | 2000-04-01 | Foladare | Applicant |
| US6049607(A) | 2000-04-01 | Marash | Applicant |
| US6058187(A) | 2000-05-01 | Chen | Applicant |
| US6067513(A) | 2000-05-01 | Ishimitsu | Applicant |
| US6073098(A) | 2000-06-01 | Buchsbaum | Applicant |
| US6076059(A) | 2000-06-01 | Glickman | Applicant |
| US6078886(A) | 2000-06-01 | Dragosh | Applicant |
| US6081774(A) | 2000-06-01 | deHita | Applicant |
| US6085186(A) | 2000-07-01 | Christianson | Applicant |
| US6101241(A) | 2000-08-01 | Boyce | Applicant |
| US6108631(A) | 2000-08-01 | Ruhl | Applicant |
| US6119087(A) | 2000-09-01 | Kuhn | Applicant |
| US6119101(A) | 2000-09-01 | Peckover | Applicant |
| US6122613(A) | 2000-09-01 | Baker | Applicant |
| US6134235(A) | 2000-10-01 | Goldman | Applicant |
| US6144667(A) | 2000-11-01 | Doshi | Applicant |
| US6144938(A) | 2000-11-01 | Surace | Applicant |
| US6154526(A) | 2000-11-01 | Dahlke | Applicant |
| US6160883(A) | 2000-12-01 | Jackson | Applicant |
| US6167377(A) | 2000-12-01 | Gillick | Applicant |
| US6173266(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Marx | Applicant |
| US6173279(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Levin | Applicant |
| US6175858(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Bulfer | Applicant |
| US6185535(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Hedin | Applicant |
| US6188982(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Chiang | Applicant |
| US6192110(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Abella | Applicant |
| US6192338(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Haszto | Applicant |
| US6195634(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Dudemaine | Applicant |
| US6195651(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Handel | Applicant |
| US6199043(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Happ | Applicant |
| US6208964(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Sabourin | Applicant |
| US6208972(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Grant | Applicant |
| US6219346(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Maxemchuk | Applicant |
| US6219643(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Cohen | Applicant |
| US6226612(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Srenger | Applicant |
| US6233556(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Teunen | Applicant |
| US6233559(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Balakrishnan | Applicant |
| US6233561(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Junqua | Applicant |
| US6236968(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Kanevsky | Applicant |
| US6246981(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Papineni | Applicant |
| US6246990(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Happ | Applicant |
| US6266636(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Kosaka | Applicant |
| US6269336(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Ladd | Applicant |
| US6272455(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Hoshen | Applicant |
| US6275231(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Obradovich | Applicant |
| US6278377(B1) | 2001-08-01 | DeLine | Applicant |
| US6278968(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Franz | Applicant |
| US6286002(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Axaopoulos | Applicant |
| US6288319(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Catona | Applicant |
| US6292767(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Jackson | Applicant |
| US6301560(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Masters | Applicant |
| US6308151(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Smith | Applicant |
| US6311159(B1) | 2001-10-01 | VanTichelen | Applicant |
| US6314402(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Monaco | Applicant |
| US6321196(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Franceschi | Applicant |
| US6356869(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Chapados | Applicant |
| US6362748(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Huang | Applicant |
| US6366882(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Bijl | Applicant |
| US6366886(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Dragosh | Applicant |
| US6374214(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Friedland | Applicant |
| US6377913(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Coffman et al. | Examiner |
| US6381535(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Durocher | Applicant |
| US6385596(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Wiser | Applicant |
| US6385646(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Brown | Applicant |
| US6393403(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Majaniemi | Applicant |
| US6393428(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Miller | Applicant |
| US6397181(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Li | Applicant |
| US6404878(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Jackson | Applicant |
| US6405170(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Phillips | Applicant |
| US6408272(B1) | 2002-06-01 | White | Applicant |
| US6411810(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Maxemchuk | Applicant |
| US6411893(B2) | 2002-06-01 | Ruhl | Applicant |
| US6415257(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Junqua | Applicant |
| US6418210(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Sayko | Applicant |
| US6420975(B1) | 2002-07-01 | DeLine | Applicant |
| US6429813(B2) | 2002-08-01 | Feigen | Applicant |
| US6430285(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Bauer | Applicant |
| US6430531(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Polish | Applicant |
| US6434523(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Monaco | Applicant |
| US6434524(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Weber | Applicant |
| US6434529(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Walker | Applicant |
| US6442522(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Carberry | Applicant |
| US6446114(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Bulfer | Applicant |
| US6453153(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Bowker | Applicant |
| US6453292(B2) | 2002-09-01 | Ramaswamy | Applicant |
| US6456711(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Cheung | Applicant |
| US6456974(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Baker | Applicant |
| US6466654(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Cooper | Applicant |
| US6466899(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Yano | Applicant |
| US6470315(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Netsch | Applicant |
| US6487494(B2) | 2002-11-01 | Odinak | Applicant |
| US6487495(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Gale | Applicant |
| US6498797(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Anerousis | Applicant |
| US6499013(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Weber | Applicant |
| US6501833(B2) | 2002-12-01 | Phillips | Applicant |
| US6501834(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Milewski | Applicant |
| US6505155(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Vanbuskirk | Applicant |
| US6510417(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Woods | Applicant |
| US6513006(B2) | 2003-01-01 | Howard | Applicant |
| US6522746(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Marchok | Applicant |
| US6523061(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Halverson | Applicant |
| US6532444(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Weber | Applicant |
| US6539348(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Bond | Applicant |
| US6549629(B2) | 2003-04-01 | Finn | Applicant |
| US6553372(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Brassell | Applicant |
| US6556970(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Sasaki | Applicant |
| US6556973(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Lewin | Applicant |
| US6560576(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Cohen | Applicant |
| US6560590(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Shwe | Applicant |
| US6567778(B1) | 2003-05-01 | ChaoChang | Applicant |
| US6567797(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Schuetze | Applicant |
| US6567805(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US6570555(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Prevost | Applicant |
| US6570964(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Murveit | Applicant |
| US6571279(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Herz | Applicant |
| US6574597(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Mohri | Applicant |
| US6574624(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US6578022(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Foulger | Applicant |
| US6581103(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Dengler | Applicant |
| US6584439(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Geilhufe | Applicant |
| US6587858(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Strazza | Applicant |
| US6591239(B1) | 2003-07-01 | McCall | Applicant |
| US6594257(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Doshi | Applicant |
| US6594367(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Marash | Applicant |
| US6598018(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Junqua | Applicant |
| US6601026(B2) | 2003-07-01 | Appelt | Applicant |
| US6604075(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Brown | Applicant |
| US6604077(B2) | 2003-08-01 | Dragosh | Applicant |
| US6606598(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Holthouse | Applicant |
| US6611692(B2) | 2003-08-01 | Raffel | Applicant |
| US6614773(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Maxemchuk | Applicant |
| US6615172(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Bennett | Applicant |
| US6622119(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Ramaswamy | Applicant |
| US6629066(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Jackson | Applicant |
| US6631346(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Karaorman | Applicant |
| US6631351(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Ramachandran | Applicant |
| US6633846(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Bennett | Applicant |
| US6636790(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Lightner | Applicant |
| US6643620(B1) | 2003-11-01 | Contolini | Applicant |
| US6647363(B2) | 2003-11-01 | Claassen | Examiner |
| US6650747(B1) | 2003-11-01 | Bala | Applicant |
| US6658388(B1) | 2003-12-01 | Kleindienst | Applicant |
| US6678680(B1) | 2004-01-01 | Woo | Applicant |
| US6681206(B1) | 2004-01-01 | Gorin | Applicant |
| US6691151(B1) | 2004-02-01 | Cheyer | Applicant |
| US6701294(B1) | 2004-03-01 | Ball et al. | Examiner |
| US6704396(B2) | 2004-03-01 | Parolkar | Applicant |
| US6704576(B1) | 2004-03-01 | Brachman | Applicant |
| US6704708(B1) | 2004-03-01 | Pickering | Examiner |
| US6707421(B1) | 2004-03-01 | Drury | Applicant |
| US6708150(B1) | 2004-03-01 | Hirayama | Applicant |
| US6721001(B1) | 2004-04-01 | Berstis | Applicant |
| US6721633(B2) | 2004-04-01 | Funk | Applicant |
| US6721706(B1) | 2004-04-01 | Strubbe | Applicant |
| US6726636(B2) | 2004-04-01 | DerGhazarian | Applicant |
| US6735592(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Neumann | Applicant |
| US6739556(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Langston | Applicant |
| US6741931(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Kohut | Applicant |
| US6742021(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Halverson | Applicant |
| US6745161(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Arnold | Applicant |
| US6751591(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Gorin | Applicant |
| US6751612(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Schuetze | Applicant |
| US6754485(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Obradovich | Applicant |
| US6754627(B2) | 2004-06-01 | Woodward | Applicant |
| US6757544(B2) | 2004-06-01 | Rangarajan | Applicant |
| US6757718(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Halverson | Applicant |
| US6795808(B1) | 2004-09-01 | Strubbe | Applicant |
| US6801604(B2) | 2004-10-01 | Maes | Applicant |
| US6801893(B1) | 2004-10-01 | Backfried | Applicant |
| US6810375(B1) | 2004-10-01 | Ejerhed | Examiner |
| US6813341(B1) | 2004-11-01 | Mahoney | Applicant |
| US6816830(B1) | 2004-11-01 | Kempe | Applicant |
| US6829603(B1) | 2004-12-01 | Chai et al. | Examiner |
| US6832230(B1) | 2004-12-01 | Zilliacus | Applicant |
| US6833848(B1) | 2004-12-01 | Wolff | Applicant |
| US6850603(B1) | 2005-02-01 | Eberle | Applicant |
| US6856990(B2) | 2005-02-01 | Barile | Applicant |
| US6865481(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Kawazoe | Applicant |
| US6868380(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Kroeker | Applicant |
| US6868385(B1) | 2005-03-01 | Gerson | Applicant |
| US6873837(B1) | 2005-03-01 | Yoshioka | Applicant |
| US6877001(B2) | 2005-04-01 | Wolf | Applicant |
| US6877134(B1) | 2005-04-01 | Fuller | Applicant |
| US6901366(B1) | 2005-05-01 | Kuhn | Applicant |
| US6910003(B1) | 2005-06-01 | Arnold | Applicant |
| US6912498(B2) | 2005-06-01 | Stevens | Applicant |
| US6915126(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Mazzara, Jr. | Applicant |
| US6928614(B1) | 2005-08-01 | Everhart | Applicant |
| US6934756(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Maes | Applicant |
| US6937977(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Gerson | Applicant |
| US6937982(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Kitaoka | Applicant |
| US6941266(B1) | 2005-09-01 | Gorin | Applicant |
| US6944594(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Busayapongchai | Applicant |
| US6950821(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Faybishenko | Applicant |
| US6954755(B2) | 2005-10-01 | Reisman | Applicant |
| US6959276(B2) | 2005-10-01 | Droppo | Applicant |
| US6961700(B2) | 2005-11-01 | Mitchell | Applicant |
| US6963759(B1) | 2005-11-01 | Gerson | Applicant |
| US6964023(B2) | 2005-11-01 | Maes | Applicant |
| US6968311(B2) | 2005-11-01 | Knockeart | Applicant |
| US6973387(B2) | 2005-12-01 | Masclet | Applicant |
| US6975993(B1) | 2005-12-01 | Keiller | Applicant |
| US6980092(B2) | 2005-12-01 | Turnbull | Applicant |
| US6983055(B2) | 2006-01-01 | Luo | Applicant |
| US6990513(B2) | 2006-01-01 | Belfiore | Applicant |
| US6996531(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Korall | Applicant |
| US7003463(B1) | 2006-02-01 | Maes et al. | Examiner |
| US7016849(B2) | 2006-03-01 | Arnold | Applicant |
| US7020609(B2) | 2006-03-01 | Thrift | Applicant |
| US7024364(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Guerra | Applicant |
| US7027586(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Bushey | Applicant |
| US7027975(B1) | 2006-04-01 | Pazandak | Applicant |
| US7035415(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Belt | Applicant |
| US7036128(B1) | 2006-04-01 | Julia | Applicant |
| US7043425(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Pao | Applicant |
| US7054817(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Shao | Applicant |
| US7058890(B2) | 2006-06-01 | George | Applicant |
| US7062488(B1) | 2006-06-01 | Reisman | Applicant |
| US7069220(B2) | 2006-06-01 | Coffman | Applicant |
| US7072834(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Zhou | Applicant |
| US7076362(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Ohtsuji | Applicant |
| US7082469(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Gold | Applicant |
| US7085708(B2) | 2006-08-01 | Manson | Applicant |
| US7092928(B1) | 2006-08-01 | Elad | Applicant |
| US7107210(B2) | 2006-09-01 | Deng | Applicant |
| US7107218(B1) | 2006-09-01 | Preston | Applicant |
| US7110951(B1) | 2006-09-01 | Lemelson | Applicant |
| US7127395(B1) | 2006-10-01 | Gorin | Applicant |
| US7127400(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Koch | Applicant |
| US7130390(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Abburi | Applicant |
| US7136875(B2) | 2006-11-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US7137126(B1) | 2006-11-01 | Coffman | Applicant |
| US7143037(B1) | 2006-11-01 | Chestnut | Applicant |
| US7143039(B1) | 2006-11-01 | Stifelman | Applicant |
| US7146319(B2) | 2006-12-01 | Hunt | Applicant |
| US7149696(B2) | 2006-12-01 | Shimizu | Applicant |
| US7165028(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Gong | Applicant |
| US7170993(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US7171291(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Obradovich | Applicant |
| US7174300(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Bush | Applicant |
| US7177798(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Hsu | Applicant |
| US7184957(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Brookes | Applicant |
| US7190770(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Ando | Applicant |
| US7197069(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Agazzi | Applicant |
| US7197460(B1) | 2007-03-01 | Gupta | Applicant |
| US7203644(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US7206418(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Yang | Applicant |
| US7207011(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Mulvey | Applicant |
| US7215941(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Beckmann | Applicant |
| US7228276(B2) | 2007-06-01 | Omote | Applicant |
| US7231343(B1) | 2007-06-01 | Treadgold | Applicant |
| US7236923(B1) | 2007-06-01 | Gupta | Applicant |
| US7254482(B2) | 2007-08-01 | Kawasaki | Applicant |
| US7272212(B2) | 2007-09-01 | Eberle | Applicant |
| US7277854(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Bennett et al. | Examiner |
| US7283829(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Christenson | Applicant |
| US7283951(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Marchisio | Applicant |
| US7289606(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Sibal | Applicant |
| US7299186(B2) | 2007-11-01 | Kuzunuki | Applicant |
| US7301093(B2) | 2007-11-01 | Sater | Applicant |
| US7305381(B1) | 2007-12-01 | Poppink | Applicant |
| US7321850(B2) | 2008-01-01 | Wakita | Applicant |
| US7328155(B2) | 2008-02-01 | Endo | Applicant |
| US7337116(B2) | 2008-02-01 | Charlesworth | Applicant |
| US7340040(B1) | 2008-03-01 | Saylor | Applicant |
| US7366285(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Parolkar | Applicant |
| US7366669(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Nishitani | Applicant |
| US7376645(B2) | 2008-05-01 | Bernard | Applicant |
| US7386443(B1) | 2008-06-01 | Parthasarathy | Applicant |
| US7398209(B2) | 2008-07-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US7406421(B2) | 2008-07-01 | Odinak | Applicant |
| US7415100(B2) | 2008-08-01 | Cooper | Applicant |
| US7415414(B2) | 2008-08-01 | Azara | Applicant |
| US7421393(B1) | 2008-09-01 | DiFabbrizio | Applicant |
| US7424431(B2) | 2008-09-01 | Greene | Applicant |
| US7447635(B1) | 2008-11-01 | Konopka | Applicant |
| US7451088(B1) | 2008-11-01 | Ehlen | Applicant |
| US7454368(B2) | 2008-11-01 | Stillman | Applicant |
| US7454608(B2) | 2008-11-01 | Gopalakrishnan | Applicant |
| US7461059(B2) | 2008-12-01 | Richardson | Applicant |
| US7472020(B2) | 2008-12-01 | Brulle-Drews | Applicant |
| US7472060(B1) | 2008-12-01 | Gorin et al. | Examiner |
| US7472075(B2) | 2008-12-01 | Odinak | Applicant |
| US7477909(B2) | 2009-01-01 | Roth | Applicant |
| US7478036(B2) | 2009-01-01 | Shen | Applicant |
| US7487088(B1) | 2009-02-01 | Gorin | Applicant |
| US7487110(B2) | 2009-02-01 | Bennett | Applicant |
| US7493259(B2) | 2009-02-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US7493559(B1) | 2009-02-01 | Wolff | Applicant |
| US7502672(B1) | 2009-03-01 | Kolls | Applicant |
| US7502738(B2) | 2009-03-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US7516076(B2) | 2009-04-01 | Walker | Applicant |
| US7529675(B2) | 2009-05-01 | Maes | Applicant |
| US7536297(B2) | 2009-05-01 | Byrd | Applicant |
| US7536374(B2) | 2009-05-01 | Au | Applicant |
| US7542894(B2) | 2009-06-01 | Murata | Applicant |
| US7546382(B2) | 2009-06-01 | Healey | Applicant |
| US7548491(B2) | 2009-06-01 | Macfarlane | Applicant |
| US7552054(B1) | 2009-06-01 | Stifelman | Applicant |
| US7558730(B2) | 2009-07-01 | Davis | Applicant |
| US7574362(B2) | 2009-08-01 | Walker | Applicant |
| US7577244(B2) | 2009-08-01 | Taschereau | Applicant |
| US7606708(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Hwang | Applicant |
| US7620549(B2) | 2009-11-01 | DiCristo | Applicant |
| US7634409(B2) | 2009-12-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US7640006(B2) | 2009-12-01 | Portman | Applicant |
| US7640160(B2) | 2009-12-01 | DiCristo | Applicant |
| US7640272(B2) | 2009-12-01 | Mahajan | Applicant |
| US7672931(B2) | 2010-03-01 | Hurst-Hiller | Applicant |
| US7676365(B2) | 2010-03-01 | Hwang | Applicant |
| US7676369(B2) | 2010-03-01 | Fujimoto | Applicant |
| US7684977(B2) | 2010-03-01 | Morikawa | Applicant |
| US7693720(B2) | 2010-04-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US7697673(B2) | 2010-04-01 | Chiu | Applicant |
| US7706616(B2) | 2010-04-01 | Kristensson | Applicant |
| US7729916(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Coffman | Applicant |
| US7729918(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Walker | Applicant |
| US7729920(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Chaar | Applicant |
| US7734287(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Ying | Applicant |
| US7748021(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Obradovich | Applicant |
| US7788084(B2) | 2010-08-01 | Brun | Applicant |
| US7792257(B1) | 2010-09-01 | Vanier | Applicant |
| US7801731(B2) | 2010-09-01 | Odinak | Applicant |
| US7809570(B2) | 2010-10-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US7818176(B2) | 2010-10-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US7831426(B2) | 2010-11-01 | Bennett | Applicant |
| US7831433(B1) | 2010-11-01 | Belvin | Applicant |
| US7856358(B2) | 2010-12-01 | Ho | Applicant |
| US7873519(B2) | 2011-01-01 | Bennett | Applicant |
| US7873523(B2) | 2011-01-01 | Potter | Applicant |
| US7873654(B2) | 2011-01-01 | Bernard | Applicant |
| US7881936(B2) | 2011-02-01 | Longe | Applicant |
| US7890324(B2) | 2011-02-01 | Bangalore | Applicant |
| US7894849(B2) | 2011-02-01 | Kass | Applicant |
| US7902969(B2) | 2011-03-01 | Obradovich | Applicant |
| US7917367(B2) | 2011-03-01 | DiCristo | Applicant |
| US7920682(B2) | 2011-04-01 | Byrne | Applicant |
| US7949529(B2) | 2011-05-01 | Weider | Applicant |
| US7949537(B2) | 2011-05-01 | Walker | Applicant |
| US7953732(B2) | 2011-05-01 | Frank | Applicant |
| US7974875(B1) | 2011-07-01 | Quilici | Applicant |
| US7983917(B2) | 2011-07-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US7984287(B2) | 2011-07-01 | Gopalakrishnan | Applicant |
| US8005683(B2) | 2011-08-01 | Tessel | Applicant |
| US8015006(B2) | 2011-09-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8032383(B1) | 2011-10-01 | Bhardwaj | Applicant |
| US8060367(B2) | 2011-11-01 | Keaveney | Applicant |
| US8069046(B2) | 2011-11-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8073681(B2) | 2011-12-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US8077975(B2) | 2011-12-01 | Ma | Applicant |
| US8082153(B2) | 2011-12-01 | Coffman | Applicant |
| US8086463(B2) | 2011-12-01 | Ativanichayaphong | Applicant |
| US8112275(B2) | 2012-02-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8140327(B2) | 2012-03-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8140335(B2) | 2012-03-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8145489(B2) | 2012-03-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US8150694(B2) | 2012-04-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8155962(B2) | 2012-04-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8170867(B2) | 2012-05-01 | Germain | Applicant |
| US8180037(B1) | 2012-05-01 | Delker | Applicant |
| US8195468(B2) | 2012-06-01 | Weider | Applicant |
| US8200485(B1) | 2012-06-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US8219399(B2) | 2012-07-01 | Lutz | Applicant |
| US8219599(B2) | 2012-07-01 | Tunstall-Pedoe | Applicant |
| US8224652(B2) | 2012-07-01 | Wang | Applicant |
| US8255224(B2) | 2012-08-01 | Singleton | Applicant |
| US8326627(B2) | 2012-12-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8326634(B2) | 2012-12-01 | DiCristo | Applicant |
| US8326637(B2) | 2012-12-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US8332224(B2) | 2012-12-01 | DiCristo | Applicant |
| US8346563(B1) | 2013-01-01 | Hjelm | Applicant |
| US8370147(B2) | 2013-02-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8447607(B2) | 2013-05-01 | Weider | Applicant |
| US8452598(B2) | 2013-05-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8503995(B2) | 2013-08-01 | Ramer | Applicant |
| US8509403(B2) | 2013-08-01 | Chiu | Applicant |
| US8515765(B2) | 2013-08-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US8527274(B2) | 2013-09-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US8589161(B2) | 2013-11-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8620659(B2) | 2013-12-01 | DiCristo | Applicant |
| US8719005(B1) | 2014-05-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US8719009(B2) | 2014-05-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US8719026(B2) | 2014-05-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8731929(B2) | 2014-05-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US8738380(B2) | 2014-05-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US8849652(B2) | 2014-09-01 | Weider | Applicant |
| US8849670(B2) | 2014-09-01 | DiCristo | Applicant |
| US8849696(B2) | 2014-09-01 | Pansari | Applicant |
| US8849791(B1) | 2014-09-01 | Hertschuh | Applicant |
| US8886536(B2) | 2014-11-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US8983839(B2) | 2015-03-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US9009046(B1) | 2015-04-01 | Stewart | Applicant |
| US9015049(B2) | 2015-04-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US9037455(B1) | 2015-05-01 | Faaborg | Applicant |
| US9105266(B2) | 2015-08-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US9171541(B2) | 2015-10-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US9269097(B2) | 2016-02-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US2001/0039492(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Nemoto | Applicant |
| US2001/0041980(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Howard | Applicant |
| US2001/0049601(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Kroeker | Applicant |
| US2001/0054087(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Flom | Applicant |
| US2002/0010584(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Schultz | Applicant |
| US2002/0015500(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Belt | Applicant |
| US2002/0022927(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Lemelson | Applicant |
| US2002/0029186(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Roth | Applicant |
| US2002/0029261(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Shibata | Applicant |
| US2002/0032752(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Gold | Applicant |
| US2002/0035501(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Handel | Applicant |
| US2002/0040297(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Tsiao | Applicant |
| US2002/0049535(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Rigo | Applicant |
| US2002/0049805(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Yamada | Applicant |
| US2002/0059068(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Rose | Applicant |
| US2002/0065568(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Silfvast | Applicant |
| US2002/0067839(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Heinrich | Applicant |
| US2002/0069059(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Smith | Applicant |
| US2002/0069071(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Knockeart | Applicant |
| US2002/0073176(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Ikeda | Applicant |
| US2002/0082911(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Dunn | Applicant |
| US2002/0087312(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US2002/0087326(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US2002/0087525(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Abbott | Applicant |
| US2002/0107694(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Lerg | Applicant |
| US2002/0120609(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Lang | Applicant |
| US2002/0124050(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Middeljans | Applicant |
| US2002/0133354(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Ross | Applicant |
| US2002/0133402(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Faber | Applicant |
| US2002/0135618(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Maes | Applicant |
| US2002/0138248(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Corston-Oliver | Applicant |
| US2002/0143532(A1) | 2002-10-01 | McLean | Applicant |
| US2002/0143535(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Kist | Applicant |
| US2002/0152260(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Chen | Applicant |
| US2002/0161646(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Gailey | Applicant |
| US2002/0173333(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Buchholz | Applicant |
| US2002/0173961(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Guerra | Applicant |
| US2002/0184373(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Maes | Applicant |
| US2002/0188602(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Stubler | Applicant |
| US2002/0198714(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Zhou | Applicant |
| US2003/0014261(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Kageyama | Applicant |
| US2003/0016835(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Elko | Applicant |
| US2003/0046346(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Mumick | Applicant |
| US2003/0064709(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Gailey | Applicant |
| US2003/0065427(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Funk | Applicant |
| US2003/0069734(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Everhart | Applicant |
| US2003/0088421(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Maes | Applicant |
| US2003/0097249(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Walker | Applicant |
| US2003/0110037(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Walker | Applicant |
| US2003/0112267(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Belrose | Applicant |
| US2003/0115062(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Walker | Applicant |
| US2003/0120493(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Gupta | Applicant |
| US2003/0135488(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Amir | Applicant |
| US2003/0144846(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Denenberg | Applicant |
| US2003/0158731(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Falcon | Applicant |
| US2003/0161448(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Parolkar | Applicant |
| US2003/0182132(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Niemoeller | Applicant |
| US2003/0187643(A1) | 2003-10-01 | VanThong | Applicant |
| US2003/0204492(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Wolf | Applicant |
| US2003/0206640(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Malvar | Applicant |
| US2003/0212550(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Ubale | Applicant |
| US2003/0212558(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Matula | Applicant |
| US2003/0212562(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Patel | Applicant |
| US2003/0225825(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Healey | Applicant |
| US2003/0236664(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Sharma | Applicant |
| US2004/0006475(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Ehlen | Applicant |
| US2004/0010358(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Oesterling | Applicant |
| US2004/0025115(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Sienel | Applicant |
| US2004/0030741(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Wolton | Applicant |
| US2004/0036601(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Obradovich | Applicant |
| US2004/0044516(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2004/0098245(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Walker | Applicant |
| US2004/0117179(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Balasuriya | Applicant |
| US2004/0117804(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Scahill | Applicant |
| US2004/0122674(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Bangalore | Applicant |
| US2004/0133793(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Ginter | Applicant |
| US2004/0140989(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Papageorge | Applicant |
| US2004/0158555(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Seedman | Applicant |
| US2004/0166832(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Portman | Applicant |
| US2004/0167771(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Duan | Applicant |
| US2004/0172247(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Yoon | Applicant |
| US2004/0172258(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Dominach | Applicant |
| US2004/0193408(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Hunt | Applicant |
| US2004/0193420(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2004/0199375(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Ehsani | Applicant |
| US2004/0205671(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Sukehiro | Applicant |
| US2004/0243417(A9) | 2004-12-01 | Pitts | Applicant |
| US2004/0247092(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Timmins | Applicant |
| US2005/0015256(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Kargman | Applicant |
| US2005/0021331(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Huang | Applicant |
| US2005/0021334(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Iwahashi | Applicant |
| US2005/0021470(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Martin | Applicant |
| US2005/0021826(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Kumar | Applicant |
| US2005/0033574(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Kim | Applicant |
| US2005/0033582(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Gadd | Applicant |
| US2005/0043940(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Elder | Applicant |
| US2005/0080632(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Endo | Applicant |
| US2005/0114116(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Fiedler | Applicant |
| US2005/0125232(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Gadd | Applicant |
| US2005/0131673(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Koizumi | Applicant |
| US2005/0137850(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Odell | Applicant |
| US2005/0137877(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Oesterling | Applicant |
| US2005/0143994(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Mori | Applicant |
| US2005/0144013(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Fujimoto | Applicant |
| US2005/0216254(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Gupta | Applicant |
| US2005/0234727(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Chiu | Applicant |
| US2005/0246174(A1) | 2005-11-01 | DeGolia | Applicant |
| US2005/0283752(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Fruchter | Applicant |
| US2006/0041431(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Maes | Applicant |
| US2006/0047509(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Ding | Applicant |
| US2006/0072738(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Louis | Applicant |
| US2006/0074671(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Farmaner | Applicant |
| US2006/0206310(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Ravikumar | Applicant |
| US2006/0217133(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Christenson | Applicant |
| US2006/0242017(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Libes | Applicant |
| US2006/0253281(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Letzt | Applicant |
| US2006/0285662(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Yin | Applicant |
| US2007/0033005(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Cristo | Applicant |
| US2007/0033020(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Francois | Applicant |
| US2007/0038436(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Cristo | Applicant |
| US2007/0038445(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Helbing | Applicant |
| US2007/0043569(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Potter | Applicant |
| US2007/0043574(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Coffman | Applicant |
| US2007/0043868(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Kumar | Applicant |
| US2007/0050191(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Weider | Applicant |
| US2007/0055525(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2007/0061067(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Zeinstra | Applicant |
| US2007/0061735(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Hoffberg | Applicant |
| US2007/0073544(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Millett | Applicant |
| US2007/0078708(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Yu | Applicant |
| US2007/0078709(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Rajaram | Applicant |
| US2007/0078814(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Flowers | Applicant |
| US2007/0094003(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Huang | Applicant |
| US2007/0112555(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Lavi | Applicant |
| US2007/0112630(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Lau | Applicant |
| US2007/0118357(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Kasravi | Applicant |
| US2007/0124057(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Prieto | Applicant |
| US2007/0135101(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Ramati | Applicant |
| US2007/0146833(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Satomi | Applicant |
| US2007/0162296(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Altberg | Applicant |
| US2007/0174258(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US2007/0179778(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Gong | Applicant |
| US2007/0185859(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Flowers | Applicant |
| US2007/0186165(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Maislos | Applicant |
| US2007/0192309(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Fischer | Applicant |
| US2007/0198267(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US2007/0203736(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Ashton | Applicant |
| US2007/0208732(A1) | 2007-09-01 | Flowers | Applicant |
| US2007/0214182(A1) | 2007-09-01 | Rosenberg | Applicant |
| US2007/0250901(A1) | 2007-10-01 | McIntire | Applicant |
| US2007/0265850(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2007/0266257(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Camaisa | Applicant |
| US2007/0276651(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Bliss | Applicant |
| US2007/0299824(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Pan | Applicant |
| US2008/0034032(A1) | 2008-02-01 | Healey | Applicant |
| US2008/0065386(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Cross | Applicant |
| US2008/0065389(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Cross | Applicant |
| US2008/0091406(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US2008/0103761(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Printz | Applicant |
| US2008/0104071(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Pragada | Applicant |
| US2008/0109285(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Reuther | Applicant |
| US2008/0115163(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Gilboa | Applicant |
| US2008/0133215(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Sarukkai | Applicant |
| US2008/0140385(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Mahajan | Applicant |
| US2008/0147396(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Wang | Applicant |
| US2008/0147410(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Odinak | Applicant |
| US2008/0154604(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Sathish | Applicant |
| US2008/0162471(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Bernard | Applicant |
| US2008/0177530(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Cross | Applicant |
| US2008/0189110(A1) | 2008-08-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US2008/0235023(A1) | 2008-09-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2008/0235027(A1) | 2008-09-01 | Cross | Applicant |
| US2008/0294437(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Nakano | Applicant |
| US2008/0319751(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2009/0006077(A1) | 2009-01-01 | Keaveney | Applicant |
| US2009/0024476(A1) | 2009-01-01 | Baar | Applicant |
| US2009/0052635(A1) | 2009-02-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US2009/0067599(A1) | 2009-03-01 | Agarwal | Applicant |
| US2009/0076827(A1) | 2009-03-01 | Bulitta | Applicant |
| US2009/0106029(A1) | 2009-04-01 | DeLine | Applicant |
| US2009/0117885(A1) | 2009-05-01 | Roth | Applicant |
| US2009/0144131(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Chiu | Applicant |
| US2009/0144271(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Richardson | Applicant |
| US2009/0150156(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2009/0171664(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2009/0216540(A1) | 2009-08-01 | Tessel | Applicant |
| US2009/0248605(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Mitchell | Applicant |
| US2009/0259646(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Fujita | Applicant |
| US2009/0265163(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Li | Applicant |
| US2009/0271194(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Davis | Applicant |
| US2009/0273563(A1) | 2009-11-01 | Pryor | Applicant |
| US2009/0276700(A1) | 2009-11-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US2009/0287680(A1) | 2009-11-01 | Paek | Applicant |
| US2009/0299745(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2009/0299857(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Brubaker | Applicant |
| US2009/0304161(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Pettyjohn | Applicant |
| US2009/0307031(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Winkler | Applicant |
| US2009/0313026(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Coffman | Applicant |
| US2010/0023320(A1) | 2010-01-01 | Cristo | Applicant |
| US2010/0029261(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Mikkelsen | Applicant |
| US2010/0036967(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Caine | Applicant |
| US2010/0049501(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2010/0049514(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2010/0057443(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Cristo | Applicant |
| US2010/0063880(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Atsmon | Applicant |
| US2010/0064025(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Nelimarkka | Applicant |
| US2010/0094707(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Freer | Applicant |
| US2010/0145700(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2010/0185512(A1) | 2010-07-01 | Borger | Applicant |
| US2010/0204986(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2010/0204994(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2010/0217604(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US2010/0286985(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2010/0299142(A1) | 2010-11-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US2010/0312566(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Odinak | Applicant |
| US2011/0022393(A1) | 2011-01-01 | Waller | Applicant |
| US2011/0106527(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Chiu | Applicant |
| US2011/0112827(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2011/0112921(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2011/0119049(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Ylonen | Applicant |
| US2011/0131036(A1) | 2011-06-01 | DiCristo | Applicant |
| US2011/0131045(A1) | 2011-06-01 | Cristo | Applicant |
| US2011/0231182(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Weider | Applicant |
| US2011/0231188(A1) | 2011-09-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2011/0307167(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Taschereau | Applicant |
| US2012/0022857(A1) | 2012-01-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US2012/0046935(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Nagao | Applicant |
| US2012/0101809(A1) | 2012-04-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2012/0101810(A1) | 2012-04-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2012/0109753(A1) | 2012-05-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2012/0150620(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Mandyam | Applicant |
| US2012/0150636(A1) | 2012-06-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US2012/0239498(A1) | 2012-09-01 | Ramer | Applicant |
| US2012/0278073(A1) | 2012-11-01 | Weider | Applicant |
| US2013/0006734(A1) | 2013-01-01 | Ocko | Applicant |
| US2013/0054228(A1) | 2013-02-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US2013/0060625(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Davis | Applicant |
| US2013/0080177(A1) | 2013-03-01 | Chen | Applicant |
| US2013/0211710(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2013/0253929(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Weider | Applicant |
| US2013/0254314(A1) | 2013-09-01 | Chow | Applicant |
| US2013/0297293(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Cristo | Applicant |
| US2013/0304473(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US2013/0311324(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Stoll | Applicant |
| US2013/0339022(A1) | 2013-12-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US2014/0006951(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Hunter | Applicant |
| US2014/0012577(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US2014/0108013(A1) | 2014-04-01 | Cristo | Applicant |
| US2014/0156278(A1) | 2014-06-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2014/0236575(A1) | 2014-08-01 | Tur | Applicant |
| US2014/0249821(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2014/0249822(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US2014/0288934(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2014/0365222(A1) | 2014-12-01 | Weider | Applicant |
| US2015/0019217(A1) | 2015-01-01 | Cristo | Applicant |
| US2015/0066627(A1) | 2015-03-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US2015/0073910(A1) | 2015-03-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2015/0095159(A1) | 2015-04-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2015/0170641(A1) | 2015-06-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| US2015/0228276(A1) | 2015-08-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US2015/0348544(A1) | 2015-12-01 | Baldwin | Applicant |
| US2015/0364133(A1) | 2015-12-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US2016/0049152(A1) | 2016-02-01 | Kennewick | Applicant |
| EP1320043(A2) | 2003-06-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1646037 | 2006-04-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2001071289 | 2001-03-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2006146881 | 2006-06-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2008027454 | 2008-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2008139928 | 2008-06-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2011504304 | 2011-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO9946763 | 1999-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO21232 | 2000-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO46792 | 2000-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO178065 | 2001-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2004072954 | 2004-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2007019318 | 2007-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2007021587 | 2007-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2007027546 | 2007-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2007027989 | 2007-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2008098039 | 2008-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2008118195 | 2008-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2009075912 | 2009-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2009145796 | 2009-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2010096752 | 2010-01-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (21)
- “Statement in Accordance with the Notice from the European Patent Office” dated Oct. 1, 2007 Concerning Business Methods (OJ EPO Nov. 2007, 592-593), XP002456252.Applicant
- Arrington, Michael, “Google Redefines GPS Navigation Landscape: Google Maps Navigation for Android 2.0”, TechCrunch, printed from the Internet <http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/28/google-redefines-car-gps-navigation-google-maps-navigation-android/>, Oct. 28, 2009, 4 pages.Applicant
- Bazzi, Issam et al., “Heterogeneous Lexical Units for Automatic Speech Recognition: Preliminary Investigations”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 3, Jun. 5-9, 2000, XP010507574, pp. 1257-1260.Applicant
- Belvin, Robert, et al., “Development of the HRL Route Navigation Dialogue System”, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, San Diego, 2001, pp. 1-5.Applicant
- Chai et al., “MIND: A Semantics-Based Multimodal Interpretation Framework for Conversational Systems”, Proceedings of the International CLASS Workshop on Natural, Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems, Jun. 2002, pp. 37-46.Applicant
- Cheyer et al., “Multimodal Maps: An Agent-Based Approach”, International Conference on Cooperative Multimodal Communication (CMC/95), May 24-26, 1995, pp. 111-121.Applicant
- El Meliani et al., “A Syllabic-Filler-Based Continuous Speech Recognizer for Unlimited Vocabulary”, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 2, Sep. 5-8, 1995, pp. 1007-1010.Applicant
- Elio et al., “On Abstract Task Models and Conversation Policies” in Workshop on Specifying and Implementing Conversation Policies, Autonomous Agents '99, Seattle, 1999, 10 pages.Applicant
- Kirchhoff, Katrin, “Syllable-Level Desynchronisation of Phonetic Features for Speech Recognition”, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language, 1996, ICSLP 96, vol. 4, IEEE, 1996, 3 pages.Applicant
- Kuhn, Thomas, et al., “Hybrid In-Car Speech Recognition for Mobile Multimedia Applications”, Vehicular Technology Conference, IEEE, Jul. 1999, pp. 2009-2013.Applicant
- Lin, Bor-shen, et al., “A Distributed Architecture for Cooperative Spoken Dialogue Agents with Coherent Dialogue State and History”, ASRU'99, 1999, 4 pages.Applicant
- Lind, R., et al., The Network Vehicle—A Glimpse into the Future of Mobile Multi-Media, IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Systems Magazine, vol. 14, No. 9, Sep. 1999, pp. 27-32.Applicant
- Mao, Mark Z., “Automatic Training Set Segmentation for Multi-Pass Speech Recognition”, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, CA. copyright 2005, IEEE, pp. I-685 to I-688.Applicant
- O'Shaughnessy, Douglas, “Interacting with Computers by Voice: Automatic Speech Recognition and Synthesis”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, No. 9, Sep. 1, 2003, XP011100665. pp. 1272-1305.Applicant
- Reuters, “IBM to Enable Honda Drivers to Talk to Cars”, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Jul. 28, 2002, 1 page.Applicant
- Turunen, “Adaptive Interaction Methods in Speech User Interfaces”, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington, 2001, pp. 91-92.Applicant
- Vanhoucke, Vincent, “Confidence Scoring and Rejection Using Multi-Pass Speech Recognition”, Nuance Communications, Menlo Park, CA, 2005, 4 pages.Applicant
- Weng, Fuliang, et al., “Efficient Lattice Representation and Generation”, Speech Technology and Research Laboratory, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1998, 4 pages.Applicant
- Wu, Su-Lin, et al., “Incorporating Information from Syllable-Length Time Scales into Automatic Speech Recognition”, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1998, vol. 2, IEEE, 1998, 4 pages.Applicant
- Wu, Su-Lin, et al., “Integrating Syllable Boundary Information into Speech Recognition”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP-97, 1997, vol. 2, IEEE, 1997, 4 pages.Applicant
- Zhao, Yilin, “Telematics: Safe and Fun Driving”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 17, Issue 1, 2002, pp. 10-14.Applicant