Compositions comprising alternating 2′-modified nucleosides for use in gene modulation

[0001] The present application is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/701,007, filed Nov. 4, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,604,183, and also claims benefit to U.S. Provisional Applications Ser. No. 60/423,760 filed Nov. 5, 2002 and Ser. No. 60/555,521, filed Mar. 22, 2004. Each of these applications is incorporated herein in its entirety.

[0002] The present invention provides modified oligomeric compounds and compositions comprising such modified oligomeric compounds that modulate gene expression. In a preferred embodiment such modulation is via the RNA interference pathway. The modified oligomeric compounds of the invention include one or more alternating motifs that can enhance various physical properties and attributes compared to wild type nucleic acids. The modified oligomeric compounds are used alone or in compositions to modulate the targeted nucleic acids. The compositions are useful for targeting selected nucleic acid molecules and modulating the expression of one or more genes. In preferred embodiments the compositions of the present invention hybridize to a portion of a target RNA resulting in loss of normal function of the target RNA.

[0003] In many species, introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) induces potent and specific gene silencing. This phenomenon occurs in both plants and animals and has roles in viral defense and transposon silencing mechanisms. This phenomenon was originally described more than a decade ago by researchers working with the petunia flower. While trying to deepen the purple color of these flowers, Jorgensen et al. introduced a pigment-producing gene under the control of a powerful promoter. Instead of the expected deep purple color, many of the flowers appeared variegated or even white. Jorgensen named the observed phenomenon “cosuppression”, since the expression of both the introduced gene and the homologous endogenous gene was suppressed (Napoli et al., Plant Cell, 1990, 2, 279-289; Jorgensen et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 1996, 31, 957-973).

[0004] Cosuppression has since been found to occur in many species of plants, fungi, and has been particularly well characterized in Neurospora crassa, where it is known as “quelling” (Cogoni and Macino, Genes Dev. 2000, 10, 638-643; Guru, Nature, 2000, 404, 804-808).

[0005] The first evidence that dsRNA could lead to gene silencing in animals came from work in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. In 1995, researchers Guo and Kemphues were attempting to use antisense RNA to shut down expression of the par-1 gene in order to assess its function. As expected, injection of the antisense RNA disrupted expression of par-1, but quizzically, injection of the sense-strand control also disrupted expression (Guo and Kempheus, Cell, 1995, 81, 611-620). This result was a puzzle until Fire et al. injected dsRNA (a mixture of both sense and antisense strands) into C. elegans. This injection resulted in much more efficient silencing than injection of either the sense or the antisense strands alone. Injection of just a few molecules of dsRNA per cell was sufficient to completely silence the homologous gene's expression. Furthermore, injection of dsRNA into the gut of the worm caused gene silencing not only throughout the worm, but also in first generation offspring (Fire et al., Nature, 1998, 391, 806-811).

[0006] The potency of this phenomenon led Timmons and Fire to explore the limits of the dsRNA effects by feeding nematodes bacteria that had been engineered to express dsRNA homologous to the C. elegans unc-22 gene. Surprisingly, these worms developed an unc-22 null-like phenotype (Timmons and Fire, Nature 1998, 395, 854; Timmons et al., Gene, 2001, 263, 103-112). Further work showed that soaking worms in dsRNA was also able to induce silencing (Tabara et al., Science, 1998, 282, 430-431). PCT publication WO 01/48183 discloses methods of inhibiting expression of a target gene in a nematode worm involving feeding to the worm a food organism which is capable of producing a double-stranded RNA structure having a nucleotide sequence substantially identical to a portion of the target gene following ingestion of the food organism by the nematode, or by introducing a DNA capable of producing the double-stranded RNA structure (Bogaert et al., 2001).

[0007] The posttranscriptional gene silencing defined in Caenorhabditis elegans resulting from exposure to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) has since been designated as RNA interference (RNAi). This term has come to generalize all forms of gene silencing involving dsRNA leading to the sequence-specific reduction of endogenous targeted mRNA levels; unlike co-suppression, in which transgenic DNA leads to silencing of both the transgene and the endogenous gene.

[0008] Introduction of exogenous double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) into Caenorhabditis elegans has been shown to specifically and potently disrupt the activity of genes containing homologous sequences. Montgomery et al. suggests that the primary interference effects of dsRNA are post-transcriptional; this conclusion being derived from examination of the primary DNA sequence after dsRNA-mediated interference a finding of no evidence of alterations followed by studies involving alteration of an upstream operon having no effect on the activity of its downstream gene. These results argue against an effect on initiation or elongation of transcription. Finally they observed by in situ hybridization, that dsRNA-mediated interference produced a substantial, although not complete, reduction in accumulation of nascent transcripts in the nucleus, while cytoplasmic accumulation of transcripts was virtually eliminated. These results indicate that the endogenous MRNA is the primary target for interference and suggest a mechanism that degrades the targeted MRNA before translation can occur. It was also found that this mechanism is not dependent on the SMG system, an MRNA surveillance system in C. elegans responsible for targeting and destroying aberrant messages. The authors further suggest a model of how dsRNA might function as a catalytic mechanism to target homologous mRNAs for degradation. (Montgomery et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95, 15502-15507).

[0009] Recently, the development of a cell-free system from syncytial blastoderm Drosophila embryos that recapitulates many of the features of RNAi has been reported. The interference observed in this reaction is sequence specific, is promoted by dsRNA but not single-stranded RNA, functions by specific MRNA degradation, and requires a minimum length of dsRNA. Furthermore, preincubation of dsRNA potentiates its activity demonstrating that RNAi can be mediated by sequence-specific processes in soluble reactions (Tuschl et al., Genes Dev., 1999, 13, 3191-3197).

[0010] In subsequent experiments, Tuschl et al, using the Drosophila in vitro system, demonstrated that 21- and 22-nt RNA fragments are the sequence-specific mediators of RNAi. These fragments, which they termed short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were shown to be generated by an RNase III-like processing reaction from long dsRNA. They also showed that chemically synthesized siRNA duplexes with overhanging 3′ ends mediate efficient target RNA cleavage in the Drosophila lysate, and that the cleavage site is located near the center of the region spanned by the guiding siRNA. In addition, they suggest that the direction of dsRNA processing determines whether sense or antisense target RNA can be cleaved by the siRNA-protein complex (Elbashir et al., Genes Dev., 2001, 15, 188-200). Further characterization of the suppression of expression of endogenous and heterologous genes caused by the 21-23 nucleotide siRNAs have been investigated in several mammalian cell lines, including human embryonic kidney (293) and HeLa cells (Elbashir et al., Nature, 2001, 411, 494-498).

[0011] Most recently, Tijsterman et al. have shown that, in fact, single-stranded RNA oligomers of antisense polarity can be potent inducers of gene silencing. As is the case for co-suppression, they showed that antisense RNAs act independently of the RNAi genes rde-1 and rde-4 but require the mutator/RNAi gene mut-7 and a putative DEAD box RNA helicase, mut-14. According to the authors, their data favor the hypothesis that gene silencing is accomplished by RNA primer extension using the MRNA as template, leading to dsRNA that is subsequently degraded suggesting that single-stranded RNA oligomers are ultimately responsible for the RNAi phenomenon (Tijsterman et al., Science, 2002, 295, 694-697).

[0012] Several recent publications have described the structural requirements for the dsRNA trigger required for RNAi activity. Recent reports have indicated that ideal dsRNA sequences are 21nt in length containing 2 nt 3′-end overhangs (Elbashir et al, EMBO (2001), 20, 6877-6887, Sabine Brantl, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2002, 1575, 15-25.) In this system, substitution of the 4 nucleosides from the 3′-end with 2′-deoxynucleosides has been demonstrated to not affect activity. On the other hand, substitution with 2′-deoxynucleosides or 2′-OMe-nucleosides throughout the sequence (sense or antisense) was shown to be deleterious to RNAi activity.

[0013] Investigation of the structural requirements for RNA silencing in C. elegans has demonstrated modification of the internucleotide linkage (phosphorothioate) to not interfere with activity (Parrish et al., Molecular Cell, 2000, 6, 1077-1087.) It was also shown by Parrish et al., that chemical modification like 2′-amino or 5′-iodouridine are well tolerated in the sense strand but not the antisense strand of the dsRNA suggesting differing roles for the 2 strands in RNAi. Base modification such as guanine to inosine (where one hydrogen bond is lost) has been demonstrated to decrease RNAi activity independently of the position of the modification (sense or antisense). Same “position independent” loss of activity has been observed following the introduction of mismatches in the dsRNA trigger. Some types of modifications, for example introduction of sterically demanding bases such as 5-iodoU, have been shown to be deleterious to RNAi activity when positioned in the antisense strand, whereas modifications positioned in the sense strand were shown to be less detrimental to RNAi activity. As was the case for the 21 nt dsRNA sequences, RNA-DNA heteroduplexes did not serve as triggers for RNAi. However, dsRNA containing 2′-F-2′-deoxynucleosides appeared to be efficient in triggering RNAi response independent of the position (sense or antisense) of the 2′-F-2′-deoxynucleosides.

[0014] In one experiment the reduction of gene expression was studied using electroporated dsRNA and a 25 mer morpholino in post implantation mouse embryos (Mellitzer et al., Mehanisms of Development, 2002, 118, 57-63). The morpholino oligomer did show activity but was not as effective as the dsRNA.

[0015] A number of PCT applications have recently been published that relate to the RNAi phenomenon. These include: PCT publication WO 00/44895; PCT publication WO 00/49035; PCT publication WO 00/63364; PCT publication WO 01/36641; PCT publication WO 01/36646; PCT publication WO 99/32619; PCT publication WO 00/44914; PCT publication WO 01/29058; and PCT publication WO 01/75164.

[0016] U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,898,031 and 6,107,094, each of which is commonly owned with this application and each of which is herein incorporated by reference, describe certain oligonucleotide having RNA like properties. When hybridized with RNA, these olibonucleotides serve as substrates for a dsRNase enzyme with resultant cleavage of the RNA by the enzyme.

[0017] In another recently published paper (Martinez et al., Cell, 2002, 110, 563-574) it was shown that double stranded as well as single stranded siRNA resides in the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) together with elF2C1 and elf2C2 (human GERp950 Argonaute proteins. The activity of 5′-phosphorylated single stranded siRNA was comparable to the double stranded siRNA in the system studied. In a related study, the inclusion of a 5′-phosphate moiety was shown to enhance activity of siRNA's in vivo in Drosophilia embryos (Boutla, et al., Curr. Biol., 2001, 11, 1776-1780). In another study, it was reported that the 5′-phosphate was required for siRNA function in human HeLa cells (Schwarz et al., Molecular Cell, 2002, 10, 537-548).

[0018] One group of researchers looked at single strand asRNA and double strand siRNA having 2′-O-methyl groups at select positions (Amarzguioui et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, 31(2), 589-595). They compared single strand asRNA wild type with 2′-O—CH₃ containing asRNA and showed that the 2′-O-methyl asRNA's showed good activity dependent on the positioning of the modifications but less than wild type. When they put 2′-O-methyl modified nucleosides into siRNA's they showed that these modifications were tolerated in smaller numbers and that there was a loss of activity with increased numbers in wings. They also showed that siRNA's with 2′-O-methyl modified nucleosides showed an increased duration of activity relative to unmodified siRNA.

[0019] Another group of researchers compared asRNA and siRNA and found almost identical target position effects, appearance of mRNA cleavage fragments and tolerance for mutational and chemical backbone modifications (Holen et al., et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, 31(9), 2401-2407). They found that small numbers of 2′-O-methyl modified nucleosides gave good activity compared to wild type but that the activity lessened as the numbers of 2′-O-methyl modified nucleosides was increased.

[0020] In another recent report researchers looked at the effects of a variety of chemical modifications, including 2′-O-methyl, had on the activity and biological properties of siRNA (Ya-Lin Chiu and Tariq M. Rana, RNA, 2003, (9), 1034-1048). They showed that incorporation of 2′-O-methyl in the sense or antisense strand (fully modified strands) severely reduced their activity in siRNA's relative to unmodified siRNA. Incorporation into both strands uniformly completely abolished activity.

[0021] One group of researchers looked at the effects of 2′-O-methyl groups and other chemically modified siRNA's in mammalian cells (Braasch et al., Biochemistry, 2003, (42), 7967-7975). They showed that fully modified 2′-O—CH₃ siRNA did not inhibit gene expression in one or both strands.

[0022] In another study the placement of a 2′-O-methyl group at the 5′-terminus on the antisense strand was reported to severely limit activity whereas the 3′-terminus of the antisense and the 3′ and 5′-termini of the sense strand were tolerated (Czaudema et al., Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, 31(11), 2705-2716). They also reported that internal 2′-O-methyls provide nuclease stability and when placed at particular positions internally they show good activity but less than unmodified siRNA. They also disclose siRNA constructs having alternating 2′-O-methyl nucleosides in both strands.

[0023] Like the RNAse H pathway, the RNA interference pathway of antisense modulation of gene expression is an effective means for modulating the levels of specific gene products and may therefore prove to be uniquely useful in a number of therapeutic, diagnostic, and research applications involving gene silencing. The present invention therefore further provides compositions useful for modulating gene expression pathways, including those relying on an antisense mechanism of action such as RNA interference and dsRNA enzymes as well as non-antisense mechanisms. One having skill in the art, once armed with this disclosure will be able, without undue experimentation, to identify preferred compositions for these uses.

[0024] In one embodiment the present invention provides oligomeric compounds wherein each one comprises a plurality of nucleosides linked together in a sequence. The sequence comprises nucleosides of at least a first type (F) and nucleosides of a second type (S). The nucleosides can be similar or dissimilar in chemical makeup e.g., different nucleobases and different in other aspects but the two types of nucleosides have different 2′-substituent groups. When the 2′-substituent groups of the first and second types of nucleosides are other than H or OH then the oligomeric compound includes at least two nucleosides of the first type and at least one nucleoside of the second type wherein the nucleosides of the first type and the nucleosides of the second type are located with respect to one another such that the sequence includes at least one FSF motif. Alternatively when the 2′-substituent group of one of the first or the second types of nucleosides is H or OH then the oligomeric compound includes at least three nucleosides of the first type and at least three nucleosides of the second type and the nucleosides of the first type and the nucleosides of the second type are located with respect to one another such that the sequence includes at least one FSFSFS motif.

[0025] In one embodiment the oligomeric compound has at least one portion that is complementary to and capable of hybridizing to a selected nucleic acid target.

[0026] In another embodiment the oligomeric compound 1 further includes at least one nucleoside of a third type (T), where the third type of nucleoside has a different 2′-substituent group when compared to either of the first or second type of nucleoside.

[0027] In one embodiment the 2′-substituent groups of the first type of nucleosides and the second type nucleosides are, independently, —F, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃, —OC₁—C₁₂alkyl, —O—CH₂—CH₂—CH₂—NH₂, —O—(CH₂)₂—O—N(R₁)₂, —O—CH₂C(═O)—N(R₁)₂, —O—(CH₂)₂—O—(CH₂)₂—N(R₁)₂, —O—CH₂—CH₂—CH₂—NHR₁, —N₃, —O—CH₂—CH₂—CH═CH₂, —NHCOR₁, —NH₂, —NHR₁, —N(R₁)₂, —SH, —SR₁, —N(H)OH, —N(H)OR₁, —N(R₁)OH, —N(R₁)OR₁ or —O—CH₂—N(H)—C(═NR₁)[N(R₁)₂];

• • [0028] wherein each R₁ is, independently, H, C₁-C₁₂ alkyl, a protecting group or substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₂ alkyl, C₂-C₁₂ alkenyl, or C₂-C₁₂ alkynyl wherein the substituent groups are selected from halogen, hydroxyl, amino, azido, cyano, haloalkyl, alkenyl, alkoxy, thioalkoxy, haloalkoxy or aryl; and wherein the oligomeric compound includes the FSF motif.

[0029] A more preferred list of 2′-substituent groups amenable to the first and second type of nucleosides includes —F, —O—CH₃, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃, —O—CH₂—CH═CH₂, N₃, NH₂, NHOH, —O—(CH₂)₂—O—N(R₁)₂, —O—CH₂C(O)—N(R₁)₂, —O—CH₂—CH₂—CH₂—NH₂, —O—(CH₂)₂—O—(CH₂)₂—N(R₁)₂ or —O—CH₂—N(H)—C(═NR₁)[N(R₁)₂];

• • [0030] wherein each R₁ is, independently, H, C₁-C₁₂ alkyl, a protecting group or substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₂ alkyl, C₂-C₁₂ alkenyl, or C₂-C₁₂ alkynyl wherein the substituent groups are selected from halogen, hydroxyl, amino, azido, cyano, haloalkyl, alkenyl, alkoxy, thioalkoxy, haloalkoxy or aryl; and wherein the oligomeric compound includes the FSF motif.

[0031] An even more preferred list of 2′-substituent groups amenable to the first and second type of nucleosides includes —F, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃, —O—CH₃, —O—CH₂—CH═CH₂ or —O—CH₂—CH—CH₂—NH(R_j) where R_j is H or C₁-C₁₀ alkyl.

[0032] In an even more preferred embodiment the 2′-substituent groups of the first type of nucleosides and the second type nucleosides are, independently, —F, —O—CH₃ or —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃.

[0033] In one embodiment, oligomeric compounds of the present invention include a nucleoside of a third type (T), the third type of nucleoside including a 2′- substituent group that is different from the 2′-substituent groups of either of the first or the second type of nucleosides. A preferred 2′-substituent group of the third type of nucleoside is H or OH.

[0034] In one embodiment of oligomeric compounds of the present invention include H or OH as one of the first or second types of nucleosides. In this case the minimum number of first and second type nucleosides is 3 each having at least one FSFSFS motif in the resulting oligomeric compound.

[0035] In one embodiment oligomeric compounds of the present invention include a plurality of linked nucleosides linked by a phosphodiester internucleoside linking groups. In another embodiment the internucleoside linking groups are phosphorothioate internucleoside linking groups. In another embodiment the internucleoside linking groups, independently, phophosphodiester or phosphorothioate internucleoside linking groups.

[0036] In one embodiment oligomeric compounds of the present invention comprise a plurality of nucleosides linked by linking groups independently selected from the group consisting of phosphodiester, phosphorothioate, chiral phosphorothioate, phosphorodithioate, phosphotriester, aminoalkylphosphotriester, methyl phosphonate, alkyl phosphonate, 5′-alkylene phosphonate, chiral phosphonate, phosphinate, phosphoramidate, 3′-amino phosphoramidate, aminoalkylphosphoramidate, thionophosphoramidate, thionoalkylphosphonate, thionoalkylphosphotriester, selenophosphate and boranophosphate.phosphodiester and phosphorothioate.

[0037] In one embodiment the oligomeric compounds of the present invention comprise at least one motif selected from F(SF)_n(S)_nn where n is from 2 to about 20 and nn is 0 or 1. In a further embodiment oligomeric compounds of the present invention comprise at least two motifs independently selected from F(SF)_n(S)_nn where n is from 1 to about 20 and nn is 0 or 1. In a preferred embodiment oligomeric compounds comprise 2 motifs selected from F(SF)_n(S)_nn where n is from 1 to about 20 and nn is 0 or 1, and the two motifs are further separated by a region comprising a sequence of nucleosides. In an even more preferred embodiment the sequence of nucleosides is joined together such that one of the motifs is located at the 5′-end of the sequence of nucleosides and the other of the motifs is located at the 3′-end of the sequence of nucleosides and the motifs being separated by from about 6 to about 20 nucleosides.

[0038] In one embodiment the oligomeric compounds of the present invention have the formula X₁—Y—X₂:

• • [0039] wherein
    • [0040] Y is a region of from about 6 to about 18 linked nucleosides; and
    • [0041] each of X₁ and X₂ is, independently, a plurality of linked nucleosides having the formula F(SF)_n(S)_nn where n is from 1 to about 20 and nn is 0 or 1.
  • [0042] In a preferred embodiment each of X₁ and X₂ is, independently, FSFS, FSFSF, FSFSFS, FSFSFSF or FSFSFSFS. In a further preferred embodiment Y is from about 5 to about 12 linked nucleosides. In another embodiment each of the linked nucleosides is linked by a phosphodiester internucleoside linkage. In another embodiment each of the linked nucleosides is linked by a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage. And in an even further embodiment each of the linked nucleosides is, independently, linked by a phophosphodiester or a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage. In another embodiment the linked nucleosides selected from F(SF)_n(S)_nn are linked by phosphodiester internucleoside linkages, the linked nucleosides comprising the Y region are linked by phosphorothioate internucleoside linkages and each of the F(SF)_n(S)_nn motifs are independently linked to the ends of the Y region by a phosphodiester or phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage. In an even further embodiment the linked nucleosides selected from F(SF)_n(S)_nn are linked by phosphorothioate internucleoside linkages, the linked nucleosides comprising the Y region are linked by phosphodiester internucleoside linkages and each of the F(SF)_n(S)_nn motifs are independently linked to the ends of the Y region by a phosphodiester or phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage.

[0043] In one embodiment the oligomeric compounds of the present invention comprise from about 10 to about 40 nucleotides. In a more preferred embodiment the oligomeric compounds of the present invention comprise from about 18 to about 30 nucleotides. In an even more preferred embodiment the oligomeric compounds of the present invention comprise from 21 to about 24 nucleotides.

[0044] In one embodiment the oligomeric compounds of the present invention comprise at least one conjugate group. In a preferred embodiment the conjugate group is a terminal cap moiety. In another preferred embodiment the conjugate group is attached to one or both of the 3′-terminal and 5′-terminal ends of the oligomeric compound. In an even more preferred embodiment the terminal cap moiety is an inverted deoxy abasic moiety.

[0045] In one embodiment of the present invention compositions are provided comprising a first oligomeric compound and a second oligomeric compound where at least a portion of the first oligomeric compound is capable of hybridizing with at least a portion of the second oligomeric compound and at least a portion of the first oligomeric compound is complementary to and capable of hybridizing to a selected nucleic acid target. At least one of the first and the second oligomeric compounds comprise at least nucleosides of a first type (F) and nucleosides of a second type (S). The first and the second types of nucleosides differing in at least one aspect from one another in that they have different 2′-substituent groups. When the 2′-substituent groups of the first and the second types of nucleosides are other than H or OH then at least one of the first and the second oligomeric compounds includes at least two nucleosides of the first type and at least one nucleoside of the second type wherein the nucleosides of the first type and the nucleosides of the second type are located with respect to one another such that the first or second oligomeric compound includes at least one FSF motif. When the 2′-substituent group of one of the first or the second type of nucleoside is H or OH then at least one of the first and the second oligomeric compounds includes at least three nucleosides of the first type and at least three nucleosides of the second type and the nucleosides of the first type and the nucleosides of the second type are located with respect to one another such that at least one of the first and the second oligomeric compounds includes at least one FSFSFS motif.

[0046] In one embodiment of the present invention compositions comprise at least one of said first and second oligomeric compounds having at least two nucleosides of a first type and at least two nucleosides of a second type and wherein the 2′-substituent groups are other 2′-H and 2′-OH thereby providing a composition having at least one of said first and said second oligomeric compound having at least one FSFS motif. In a further embodiment there are at least three nucleosides of said first type and at least two nucleosides of said second type to give a t least one of said first and said second oligomeric compound having at least one FSFSF motif

[0047] In one embodiment the compositions of the present invention at least one of the first and the second oligomeric compounds comprise only nucleosides of the first type and nucleosides of the second type and wherein the nucleosides of the first and the second types are alternating throughout the entire sequence of the oligomeric compound. In a further embodiment both of the first and the second oligomeric compounds comprise only nucleosides of the first type and nucleosides of the second type and wherein the nucleosides of the first and the second types are alternating throughout the entire sequence of both of the oligomeric compounds.

[0048] In one embodiment the compositions of the present invention comprise a third type of nucleoside (T) that is different than said first and said second type of nucleosides. In a preferred embodiment the 2′-substituent group of the third type nucleoside is 2′-H or 2′-OH.

[0049] In one embodiment the 2′-substituent groups of the first and the second types of nucleosides are, independently, —F, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃,—OC₁-C₁₂ alkyl, —O—CH₂—CH₂—CH₂—NH₂, —O—(CH₂)₂—O—N(R₁)₂, —O—CH₂C(═O)—N(R₁)₂, —O—(CH₂)₂—O—(CH₂)₂—N(R₁)₂, —O—CH₂—CH₂—CH₂—NHR₁, —N₃, —O—CH₂—CH═CH₂, —NHCOR₁, —NH₂, —NHR₁, —N(R₁)₂, —SH, —SR₁, —N(H)OH, —N(H)OR₁, —N(R₁)OH, —N(R₁)OR₁ or —O—CH₂—N(H)—C(═NR₁)[N(R₁)₂]; wherein each R₁ is, independently, H, C₁-C₁₂ alkyl, a protecting group or substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₂ alkyl, C₂-C₁₂ alkenyl, or C₂-C₁₂ alkynyl wherein the substituent groups are selected from halogen, hydroxyl, amino, azido, cyano, haloalkyl, alkenyl, alkoxy, thioalkoxy, haloalkoxy or aryl. A more preferred list of 2′-substituent groups of the first and the second types of nucleosides are, independently, —F, —O—CH₃, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃, —O—CH₂—CH═CH₂, N₃, NH₂, NHOH, —O—(CH₂)₂—O—N(R₁)₂, —O—CH₂C(O)—N(R₁)₂, —O—CH₂—CH₂—CH₂—NH₂, —O—(CH₂)₂—O—(CH₂)₂—N(R₁)₂ or —O—CH₂—N(H)—C(═NR₁)[N(R₁)₂];

• • [0050] wherein each R₁ is, independently, H, C₁-C₁₂ alkyl, a protecting group or substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₂ alkyl, C₂-C₁₂ alkenyl, or C₂-C₁₂ alkynyl wherein the substituent groups are selected from halogen, hydroxyl, amino, azido, cyano, haloalkyl, alkenyl, alkoxy, thioalkoxy, haloalkoxy or aryl wherein the oligomeric compound includes the FSF motif.

[0051] An even more preferred list of 2′-substituent groups of the first and the second types of nucleosides includes —F, —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃, —O—CH₃, —O—CH₂—CH═CH₂ or —O—CH₂—CH—CH₂—NH(R_j) where R_j is H or C₁-C₁₀ alkyl.

[0052] A preferred list of 2′-substituent groups of the first and the second types of nucleosides includes —F, —O—CH₃ or —O—CH₂CH₂—O—CH₃. With —F or —O—CH₃ being an even more preferred list.

[0053] In one embodiment each of the first and the second type of nucleosides have 3′-endo conformational geometry.

[0054] In one embodiment, the compositions of the present invention include first type of nucleosides that are 2′-OH nucleosides. In another embodiment the first type nucleoside is 2′-H nucleoside. In another embodiment the second type nucleoside is a 2′-F nucleoside. In even another embodiment the second type nucleoside is a 2′-O—CH₃ nucleoside. In another embodiment the first type of nucleosides are 2′-fluoro nucleosides and the second type of nucleosides are 2′-O—CH₃ nucleosides.

[0055] In one embodiment of the present invention the first oligomeric compound further comprises a 5′-phosphate group. In another embodiment the second oligomeric compound further comprises a 5′-phosphate group. In even a further embodiment each of the first and the second oligomeric compounds independently, comprise a 5′-phosphate group. In an even further embodiment the first oligomeric compound comprises a 3′-terminal OH group.

[0056] In one embodiment of the present invention compositions the nucleosides of each of the first and the second oligomeric compounds are linked by phosphodiester internucleoside linking groups. In another embodiment the nucleosides of each of the first and the second oligomeric compounds are linked by phosphorothioate internucleoside linking groups. In an even further embodiment the nucleosides of one the first and the second oligomeric compound are linked by phosphorothioate internucleoside linking groups and the nucleosides of the other of the first and the second oligomeric compound are linked by phosphodiester internucleoside linking groups. In a further embodiment the nucleosides of the first oligomeric compound are linked by phosphorothioate internucleoside linking groups and the nucleosides of the second oligomeric compound are linked by phosphodiester internucleoside linking groups. In an even further embodiment each of the nucleosides of the first and the second oligomeric compound are independently linked by phosphorothioate or phosphodiester internucleoside linking groups.

[0057] In one embodiment of the present invention each of the nucleosides of the first and the second oligomeric compound are independently linked by an internucleoside linking group selected from the group consisting of phosphodiester, phosphorothioate, chiral phosphorothioate, phosphorodithioate, phosphotriester, aminoalkylphosphotriester, methyl phosphonate, alkyl phosphonate, 5′-alkylene phosphonate, chiral phosphonate, phosphinate, phosphoramidate, 3′-amino phosphoramidate, aminoalkylphosphoramidate, thionophosphoramidate, thionoalkylphosphonate, thionoalkylphosphotriester, selenophosphate and boranophosphate.

[0058] In one embodiment each of the first and the second oligomeric compounds comprise only the first and the second type nucleosides and wherein the first and the second type nucleosides are alternating in both of the first and the second oligomeric compounds wherein preferred first type nucleosides comprise 2′-F or 2′-O—CH₃ groups. In a preferred embodiment the first type nucleosides comprises one of 2′-F or 2′-O—CH₃ groups and the second type nucleosides comprise the other of 2′-F or 2′-O—CH₃ groups with 2′-F or 2′-O—CH₃ groups preferred for the first type nucleosides. In a preferred embodiment the first oligomeric compound has first type nucleosides starting at its 5′-terminus and wherein the first type nucleosides of the first and the second oligomeric compounds align with each other when the first and second oligomeric compounds are hybridized. In another preferred embodiment the first oligomeric compound has first type nucleosides starting at its 5′-terminus wherein the first type nucleosides of the first oligomeric compound and the second type nucleosides of the second oligomeric compound align with each other when the first and the second oligomeric compounds are hybridized.

[0059] In one embodiment of the present invention when the first and second oligomeric compounds comprise only the first and second type nucleosides and where the first and second type nucleosides are alternating in both of the first and the second oligomeric compounds the first type nucleosides comprises one of 2′-F or 2′-O—CH₃ groups and the second type nucleosides comprise the other of 2′-F or 2′-O—CH₃ groups. In a preferred embodiment the nucleosides of the first oligomeric compound are linked with phosphorothioate internucleoside linking groups. In another preferred embodiment the nucleosides of the second oligomeric compound are linked with phosphodiester internucleoside linking groups.

[0060] In one embodiment compositions of the present invention comprise at least one conjugate group. In a preferred embodiment the conjugate group is attached at the 3′-end, the 5′-end or both the 3′-end and the 5′-end of one of the first and second oligomeric compounds. In a more preferred embodiment the conjugate group comprises a terminal cap moiety. In an even more preferred embodiment the terminal cap moiety is an inverted deoxy abasic moiety. In a more preferred embodiment one of the first and second oligomeric compounds is a sense strand and wherein the sense strand comprises a terminal cap moiety at one or both of the 3′-terminal and the 5′-terminal ends wherein a preferred terminal cap moiety is an inverted deoxy abasic moiety.

[0061] In one embodiment of the present invention the first and the second oligomeric compounds are a complementary pair of siRNA oligonucleotides.

[0062] In one embodiment at least one of the first or second oligomeric compounds comprise at least one motif selected from F(SF)_n(S)_nn where n is from 2 to about 20 and nn is 0 or 1. In a preferred embodiment at least one of the first or second oligomeric compounds comprises at least two motifs independently selected from F(SF)_n(S)_nn where n is from 2 to about 20 and nn is 0 or 1. In an even more preferred embodiment the two motifs are separated by a region comprising a sequence of nucleosides. In another preferred embodiment one of the two motifs are located at the 5′-end of one of the first or second oligomeric compounds and the second of the two motifs is located at the 3′-end of the same oligomeric compound and wherein from about 6 to about 20 nucleosides are located between the motifs. In a preferred embodiment the first or second oligomeric compound having the motifs has the formula: X₃—Y₂—X₄:

• • [0063] wherein Y₂ is a region of from about 6 to about 18 linked nucleosides and each of X₃ and X₄ is, independently, a plurality of linked nucleosides having the formula (SF)_n(S)_nn where n is from 2 to about 20 and nn is 0 or 1; and nn is from 1 to about 3.
    In a preferred embodiment each of X₃ and X₄ is, independently, FSFS, FSFSF, FSFSFS, FSFSFSF or FSFSFSFS. In another preferred embodiment Y₂ is from about 5 to about 12 linked nucleosides. In a preferred embodiment each of the linked nucleosides is linked by a phosphodiester internucleoside linkage. In a further preferred each of the linked nucleosides is linked by a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage and in another preferred embodiment each of the linked nucleosides is, independently, linked by a phosphodiester or a phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage.

[0064] In a further embodiment the linked nucleosides selected from F(SF)_n(S)_nn are linked by phosphodiester internucleoside linkages, the linked nucleosides comprising the Y region are linked by phosphorothioate internucleoside linkages and each of the F(SF)_n(S)_nn motifs are independently linked to the ends of the Y region by a phosphodiester or phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage. In a further embodiment the linked nucleosides selected from F(SF)_n(S)_nn are linked by phosphorothioate internucleoside linkages, the linked nucleosides comprising the Y region are linked by phosphodiester internucleoside linkages and each of the F(SF)_n(S)_nn motifs are independently linked to the ends of the Y region by a phosphodiester or phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage.

[0065] In one embodiment compositions of the present invention comprise first and the second oligomeric compounds that are an antisense/sense pair of oligonucleotides.

[0066] In one embodiment compositions are provided wherein each of the first and second oligomeric compounds has from about about 8 to about 80 nucleotides. In other embodiments, the oligomeric compounds have from about 12 to about 30 nucleotides. In yet other embodiments, the oligomeric compounds have from about 12 to about 24 nucleotides. In certain preferred embodiments, the oligomeric compounds have from about 19 to about 23 nucleotides.

[0067] In one embodiment compositions are provided wherein the first oligomeric compound is an antisense oligonucleotide.

[0068] In one embodiment compositions are provided wherein the second oligomeric compound is a sense oligonucleotide.

[0069] In one embodiment methods are provided inhibiting gene expression comprising contacting one or more cells, a tissue or an animal with a composition of the invention.

[0070] In one embodiment methods are provided inhibiting gene expression comprising contacting one or more cells, a tissue or an animal with an oligomeric compound of the invention.

[0071] The present invention provides single and double stranded compositions comprising at least one alternating motif. Alternating motifs of the present invention have the formula F(SF)_n(S)_nn where F is a nucleoside of a first type, S is a nucleoside of a second type, n is from 1 to about 20 and nn is 0 or 1. Each of the types of nucleosides have identical 2′-substituent groups with the two types being differentiated from each other in that at least the 2′-substituent groups are different. H and OH are not used in the alternating motif until there are at least 3 of each type of nucleosides present thereby forming a FSFSFS or larger run of alternating nucleosides in which case one of the first and second types of nucleosides can be H or OH. The alternating motifs can be present in one more regions of a single stranded oligomeric compound or can be found in one or more regions in two oligomeric comounds forming a double stranded composition of the inveniton.

[0072] In one aspect of the present invention the compositions comprise a region of complementarity to a nucleic acid target. The complementary region can comprise a continuous sequence of nucleosides bound by internucleoside linkages or can comprise multiple regions that are interupted by secondary structures such as a loops thereby forming a complementary region from two or more non-continuous regions of the same oligomeric compound. Double stranded regions of the compositions of the present invention can be formed from two oligomeric compounds hybridized together or from a single oligomeric compound that has a region of self complementarity.

[0073] In another aspect of the present invention oligomeric compounds are provided comprising at least one alternating motif. These oligomeric compounds are useful as asRNAs in the RNAi pathway. In the context of the present invention an “asRNA” is an antisense RNA oligomeric compound that is not duplexed with another separate oligonucleotide such as a sense strand but may contain duplexed regions formed between adjacent complementary regions. In one aspect the compositions comprising alternating motifs of the present invention mimic RNA by incorporating regions of nucleosides having 3′-endo conformational geometry and enhance desired properties such as but not limited to modulation of pharmacokinetic properties through modification of protein binding, protein off-rate, absorption and clearance; modulation of nuclease stability as well as chemical stability; modulation of the binding affinity and specificity of the oligomer (affinity and specificity for enzymes as well as for complementary sequences); and increasing efficacy of RNA cleavage.

[0074] In one aspect of the present invention compositions are provided comprising a first and a second oligomeric compound that are at least partially hybridized to form a duplex region and further comprising a region that is complementary to and hybridizes to a nucleic acid target. Each of the compositions of the invention comprise at least one alternating motif. In one aspect the compositions include a first oligomeric compound that is an antisense strand having a complementary region to a nucleic acid target and a second oligomeric compound that is a sense strand having one or more regions of complementarity to and forming at least one duplex region with the first oligomeric compound. At least one alternating motif is located on either the first or second oligomeric compound.

[0075] Compositions of the present invention also include single and double stranded constructs that comprise at least two regions of alternating nucleosides in one or both of the strands. These alternating regions can comprise up to about 40 nucleosides but preferable comprise from about 3 to about 9 nucleosides. In a preferred embodiment the regions of alternating nucleosides are located at the termini of one or both oligomeric compounds in an oligomeric compound or composition of the invention. In an even more preferred embodiment an oligomeric comound of the invention comprises from 4 to about 8 nucleosides of alternating nucleosides at each termini (3′ and 5′) and these regions are separated by from about 5 to about 12 linked nucleosides.

[0076] Some representative duplexed constructs amenable to the present invention are shown below:

[0077]

	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	5′-NN NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-3′	as
	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	3′-NN NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-5′	s
	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	5′-NN NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-3′	as
	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	3′-NN NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-5′	s
	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	5′-NN NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-3′	as
	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	3′-NN NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-5′	s
	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	5′-N NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-3′	as
	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	3′-N NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-5′	s
	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	5′-N NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-3′	as
	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	3′-N NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-5′	s
	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	5′-N NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-3′	as
	(SEQ ID NO.: 53)
	3′-N NNN NNN N(N)n NNN NNN NNN-5′	s

[0078] The underlined regions represent linked nucleosides that can be uniform or modified. Essentially the underlined region can be described as being the gap and is shown being variable with n being generally from about 1 to about 40 but from 1 to about 4 being preferred. The alternating regions are shown in bold. These examples are meant to be representative and not limiting. The alternating nucleosides can be aligned on the two strands such as for example all the modifications in the alternating regions of the sense strand strand are paired with identical modifications in the antisense strand or alternatively the registers can be offset with the like modifications in the alternating regions of one strand pairing with unlike modifications in the other strand. Another option is to have dissimilar modifications in each of the strands which would not lead to an aligned or misaligned register.

[0079] Preferred 2′-modifications for the alternating regions comprise all possible orientations of OMe, MOE, OH, F, deoxy, ara OH, ara F with backbone either full PO or Full PS throughout or PO/PS either in wings or gap and the other of PO/PS in the other of the wings or the gap.

[0080] Compositions of the present invention are useful for the modulation of gene expression. In one aspect of the present invention a targeted cell, group of cells, a tissue or an animal is contacted with a composition of the invention to effect reduction of mRNA that can directly inhibit gene expression. In another embodiment the reduction of mRNA indirectly upregulates a non-targeted gene through a pathway that relates the targeted gene to a non-targeted gene. Numerous methods and models for the regulation of genes using compositions of the invention are illustrated in the examples.

[0081] Compositions of the invention modulate gene expression by hybridizing to a nucleic acid target resulting in loss of its normal function. As used herein, the term “target nucleic acid” or “nucleic acid target” is used for convenience to encompass any nucleic acid capable of being targeted including without limitation DNA, RNA (including pre-mRNA and mRNA or portions thereof) transcribed from such DNA, and also cDNA derived from such RNA. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the target nucleic acid is a messenger RNA. In a further preferred embodiment the degradation of the targeted messenger RNA is facilitated by a RISC complex that is formed with compositions of the invention. In another preferred embodiment the degradation of the targeted messenger RNA is facilitated by a nuclease such as RNaseH.

[0082] The hybridization of a composition of the invention with its target nucleic acid is generally referred to as “antisense”. Consequently, the preferred mechanism in the practice of some preferred embodiments of the invention is referred to herein as “antisense inhibition.” Such antisense inhibition is typically based upon hydrogen bonding-based hybridization of oligonucleotide strands or segments such that at least one strand or segment is cleaved, degraded, or otherwise rendered inoperable. In this regard, it is presently preferred to target specific nucleic acid molecules and their functions for such antisense inhibition.

[0083] The functions of DNA to be interfered with can include replication and transcription. Replication and transcription, for example, can be from an endogenous cellular template, a vector, a plasmid construct or otherwise. The functions of RNA to be interfered with can include functions such as translocation of the RNA to a site of protein translation, translocation of the RNA to sites within the cell which are distant from the site of RNA synthesis, translation of protein from the RNA, splicing of the RNA to yield one or more RNA species, and catalytic activity or complex formation involving the RNA which may be engaged in or facilitated by the RNA. In the context of the present invention, “modulation” and “modulation of expression” mean either an increase (stimulation) or a decrease (inhibition) in the amount or levels of a nucleic acid molecule encoding the gene, e.g., DNA or RNA. Inhibition is often the preferred form of modulation of expression and mRNA is often a preferred target nucleic acid.

[0084] The compositions and methods of the present invention are also useful in the study, characterization, validation and modulation of small non-coding RNAs. These include, but are not limited to, microRNAs (miRNA), small nuclear RNAs (snRNA), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNA), small temporal RNAs (stRNA) and tiny non-coding RNAs (tncRNA) or their precursors or processed transcripts or their association with other cellular components.

[0085] Small non-coding RNAs have been shown to function in various developmental and regulatory pathways in a wide range of organisms, including plants, nematodes and mammals. MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that are processed from larger precursors by enzymatic cleavage and inhibit translation of mRNAs. stRNAs, while processed from precursors much like miRNAs, have been shown to be involved in developmental timing regulation. Other non-coding small RNAs are involved in events as diverse as cellular splicing of transcripts, translation, transport, and chromosome organization.

[0086] As modulators of small non-coding RNA function, the compositions of the present invention find utility in the control and manipulation of cellular functions or processes such as regulation of splicing, chromosome packaging or methylation, control of developmental timing events, increase or decrease of target RNA expression levels depending on the timing of delivery into the specific biological pathway and translational or transcriptional control. In addition, the compositions of the present invention can be modified in order to optimize their effects in certain cellular compartments, such as the cytoplasm, nucleus, nucleolus or mitochondria.

[0087] The compositions of the present invention can further be used to identify components of regulatory pathways of RNA processing or metabolism as well as in screening assays or devices.

Oligomeric Compounds

[0088] In the context of this invention, the term “oligomeric compound” refers to a plurality of naturally-occurring and or non-naturally-occurring monomeric units joined together in a specific sequence. This term includes oligonucleotides, oligonucleosides, oligonucleotide analogs, oligonucleotide mimetics and combinations of these. Oligomeric compounds are typically structurally distinguishable from, yet functionally interchangeable with, naturally-occurring or synthetic wild-type oligonucleotides. Thus, oligomeric compounds include all such structures that function effectively to mimic the structure and/or function of a desired RNA or DNA strand, for example, by hybridizing to a target.

[0089] Oligomeric compounds are routinely prepared linearly but can be joined or otherwise prepared to be circular and may also include branching. Oligomeric compounds can included double stranded constructs such as for example two strands hybridized to form double stranded compounds. The double stranded compounds can be linked or separate and can include overhangs on the ends. In general an oligomeric compound comprises a backbone of linked momeric subunits where each linked momeric subunit is directly or indirectly attached to a heterocyclic base moiety. Oligomeric compounds may also include monomeric subunits that are not linked to a heterocyclic base moiety thereby providing abasic sites. The linkages joining the monomeric subunits, the sugar moieties or surrogates and the heterocyclic base moieties can be independently modified giving rise to a plurality of motifs for the resulting oligomeric compounds including hemimers, gapmers and chimeras.

[0090] In the context of this invention, the term “oligonucleotide” refers to an oligomer or polymer of ribonucleic acid (RNA) or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or mimetics thereof. This term includes oligonucleotides composed of naturally-occurring nucleobases, sugars and covalent internucleoside (backbone) linkages as well as oligonucleotides having non-naturally-occurring portions that function similarly. Such modified or substituted oligonucleotides are often preferred over native forms because of desirable properties such as, for example, enhanced cellular uptake, enhanced affinity for nucleic acid target and increased stability in the presence of nucleases.

[0091] Included in preferred oligomeric compounds are oligonucleotides such as antisense oligonucleotides, antisense oligonucleotides, ribozymes, external guide sequence (EGS) oligonucleotides, alternate splicers, primers, probes, and other oligonucleotides which hybridize to at least a portion of the target nucleic acid. As such, these oligonucleotides may be introduced in the form of single-stranded, double-stranded, circular or hairpin oligonucleotides and may contain structural elements such as internal or terminal bulges or loops. Once introduced to a system, the compositions of the invention may elicit the action of one or more enzymes or structural proteins to effect modification of the target nucleic acid.

[0092] One non-limiting example of such an enzyme is RNAse H, a cellular endonuclease which cleaves the RNA strand of an RNA:DNA duplex. It is known in the art that single-stranded antisense oligonucleotides which are “DNA-like” elicit RNAse H. Activation of RNase H, therefore, results in cleavage of the RNA target, thereby greatly enhancing the efficiency of oligonucleotide-mediated inhibition of gene expression. Similar roles have been postulated for other ribonucleases such as those in the RNase III and ribonuclease L family of enzymes.

[0093] While the preferred form of antisense oligonucleotide is a single-stranded antisense oligonucleotide, in many species the introduction of double-stranded structures, such as double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecules, has been shown to induce potent and specific antisense-mediated reduction of the function of a gene or its associated gene products. This phenomenon occurs in both plants and animals and is believed to have an evolutionary connection to viral defense and transposon silencing.

[0094] In the context of this invention, the term “oligonucleoside” refers to a sequence of nucleosides that are joined by internucleoside linkages that do not have phosphorus atoms. Internucleoside linkages of this type include short chain alkyl, cycloalkyl, mixed heteroatom alkyl, mixed heteroatom cycloalkyl, one or more short chain heteroatomic and one or more short chain heterocyclic. These internucleoside linkages include but are not limited to siloxane, sulfide, sulfoxide, sulfone, acetyl, formacetyl, thioformacetyl, methylene formacetyl, thioformacetyl, alkeneyl, sulfamate; methyleneimino, methylenehydrazino, sulfonate, sulfonamide, amide and others having mixed N, O, S and CH₂ component parts.

[0095] Representative U.S. patents that teach the preparation of the above oligonucleosides include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,034,506; 5,166,315; 5,185,444; 5,214,134; 5,216,141; 5,235,033; 5,264,562; 5,264,564; 5,405,938; 5,434,257; 5,466,677; 5,470,967; 5,489,677; 5,541,307; 5,561,225; 5,596,086; 5,602,240; 5,610,289; 5,602,240; 5,608,046; 5,610,289; 5,618,704; 5,623,070; 5,663,312; 5,633,360; 5,677,437; 5,792,608; 5,646,269 and 5,677,439, certain of which are commonly owned with this application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

[0096] In addition to the modifications described above, the nucleosides of the compositions of the invention can have a variety of other modification so long as these other modifications either alone or in combination with other nucleosides enhance one or more of the desired properties described above. Thus, for nucleotides that are incorporated into compositions of the invention, these nucleotides can have sugar portions that correspond to naturally-occurring sugars or modified sugars. Representative modified sugars include carbocyclic or acyclic sugars, sugars having substituent groups at one or more of their 2′, 3′ or 4′ positions and sugars having substituents in place of one or more hydrogen atoms of the sugar. Additional nucleosides amenable to the present invention having altered base moieties and or altered sugar moieties are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808 and PCT application PCT/US89/02323.

[0097] Oligomeric compounds having altered base moieties or altered sugar moieties are also included in the present invention. All such modified oligomeric compounds are comprehended by this invention so long as they function effectively to mimic the structure of a desired RNA or DNA strand. A class of representative base modifications include tricyclic cytosine analog, termed “G clamp” (Lin, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8531). This analog makes four hydrogen bonds to a complementary guanine (G) within a helix by simultaneously recognizing the Watson-Crick and Hoogsteen faces of the targeted G. This G clamp modification when incorporated into phosphorothioate oligonucleotides, dramatically enhances antisense potencies in cell culture. The compositions of the invention also can include phenoxazine-substituted bases of the type disclosed by Flanagan, et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17(1), 48-52.

[0098] The oligomeric compounds in accordance with this invention preferably comprise from about 8 to about 80 nucleobases (i.e. from about 8 to about 80 linked nucleosides and/or monomeric subunits). One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the invention embodies oligomeric compounds of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, or 80 nucleobases in length.

[0099] In one preferred embodiment, the oligomeric compounds of the invention are 10 to 50 nucleobases in length. One having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that this embodies oligomeric compounds of 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, or 50 nucleobases in length.

[0100] In another preferred embodiment, the oligomeric compounds of the invention are 12 to 30 nucleobases in length. One having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that this embodies oligomeric compounds of 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 nucleobases in length.

[0101] In a further preferred embodiment, the oligomeric compounds of the invention are 12 to 24 nucleobases in length. One having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that this embodies oligomeric compounds of 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 or 24 nucleobases in length.

[0102] In another preferred embodiment, the oligomeric compounds of the invention are 19 to 23 nucleobases in length. One having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that this embodies oligomeric compounds of 19, 20, 21, 22 or 23 nucleobases in length.

[0103] One particularly preferred length for oligomeric compounds is from about 12 to about 30 nucleobases. Another particularly preferred length is from about 12 to about 24 nucleobases. A further particularly preferred length is from about 19 to about 23 nucleobases.

Chimeric Oligomeric Compounds

[0104] It is not necessary for all positions in an oligomeric compound to be uniformly modified, and in fact more than one of the aforementioned modifications may be incorporated in a single oligomeric compound or even at a single monomeric subunit such as a nucleoside within a oligonucleotide. The present invention also includes chimeric oligomeric compounds such as chimeric oligonucleotides. “Chimeric” oligomeric compounds or “chimeras,” in the context of this invention, are oligomeric compounds such as oligonucleotides containing two or more chemically distinct regions, each made up of at least one monomer unit, i.e., a nucleotide in the case of a nucleic acid based oligomer.

[0105] Chimeric oligonucleotides typically contain at least one region modified so as to confer increased resistance to nuclease degradation, increased cellular uptake, and/or increased binding affinity for the target nucleic acid. An additional region of the oligonucleotide may serve as a substrate for enzymes capable of cleaving RNA:DNA or RNA:RNA hybrids. By way of example, RNase H is a cellular endonuclease which cleaves the RNA strand of an RNA:DNA duplex. Activation of RNase H, therefore, results in cleavage of the RNA target, thereby greatly enhancing the efficiency of inhibition of gene expression. Consequently, comparable results can often be obtained with shorter oligonucleotides when chimeras are used, compared to for example phosphorothioate deoxyoligonucleotides hybridizing to the same target region. Cleavage of the RNA target can be routinely detected by gel electrophoresis and, if necessary, associated nucleic acid hybridization techniques known in the art.

[0106] Chimeric compositions of the invention may be formed as composite structures of two or more oligomeric compounds such as oligonucleotides, oligonucleotide analogs, oligonucleosides and/or oligonucleotide mimetics as described above. Such oligomeric compounds have also been referred to in the art as hybrids hemimers, gapmers or inverted gapmers. Representative U.S. patents that teach the preparation of such hybrid structures include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,013,830; 5,149,797; 5,220,007; 5,256,775; 5,366,878; 5,403,711; 5,491,133; 5,565,350; 5,623,065; 5,652,355; 5,652,356; and 5,700,922, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Oligomer Mimetics

[0107] Another preferred group of oligomeric compounds amenable to the present invention includes oligonucleotide mimetics. The term mimetic as it is applied to oligonucleotides is intended to include oligonucleotides wherein only the furanose ring or both the furanose ring and the internucleotide linkage are replaced with novel groups, replacement of only the furanose ring is also referred to in the art as being a sugar surrogate. The heterocyclic base moiety or a modified heterocyclic base moiety is maintained for hybridization with an appropriate target nucleic acid. One such oligonucleotide, an oligonucleotide mimetic that has been shown to have excellent hybridization properties, is referred to as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA). In PNA oligonucleotides, the sugar-backbone of an oligonucleotide is replaced with an amide containing backbone, in particular an aminoethylglycine backbone. The nucleobases are retained and are bound directly or indirectly to aza nitrogen atoms of the amide portion of the backbone. Representative U.S. patents that teach the preparation of PNA oligonucleotides include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,539,082; 5,714,331; and 5,719,262, each of which is herein incorporated by reference. Further teaching of PNA oligonucleotides can be found in Nielsen et al., Science, 1991, 254, 1497-1500.

[0108] One oligonucleotide mimetic that has been reported to have excellent hybridization properties, is peptide nucleic acids (PNA). The backbone in PNA compounds is two or more linked aminoethylglycine units which gives PNA an amide containing backbone. The heterocyclic base moieties are bound directly or indirectly to aza nitrogen atoms of the amide portion of the backbone. Representative U.S. patents that teach the preparation of PNA compounds include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,539,082; 5,714,331; and 5,719,262, each of which is herein incorporated by reference. Further teaching of PNA compounds can be found in Nielsen et al., Science, 1991, 254, 1497-1500.

[0109] Numerous modifications have been made to the structure of PNA since the basic PNA structure was first prepared. The basic structure is shown below:

[0110]
wherein

• • [0111] Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;
  • [0112] T₄ is hydrogen, an amino protecting group, —C(O)R₅, substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl, alkylsulfonyl, arylsulfonyl, a chemical functional group, a reporter group, a conjugate group, a D or L α-amino acid linked via the a-carboxyl group or optionally through the ω-carboxyl group when the amino acid is aspartic acid or glutamic acid or a peptide derived from D, L or mixed D and L amino acids linked through a carboxyl group, wherein the substituent groups are selected from hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy, carboxy, benzyl, phenyl, nitro, thiol, thioalkoxy, halogen, alkyl, aryl, alkenyl and alkynyl;
  • [0113] T₅ is —OH, —N(Z₁)Z₂, R₅, D or L α-amino acid linked via the α-amino group or optionally through the ω-amino group when the amino acid is lysine or ornithine or a peptide derived from D, L or mixed D and L amino acids linked through an amino group, a chemical functional group, a reporter group or a conjugate group;
  • [0114] Z₁ is hydrogen, C₁-C₆ alkyl, or an amino protecting group;
  • [0115] Z₂ is hydrogen, C₁-C₆ alkyl, an amino protecting group, —C(═O)—(CH₂)_n-J-Z₃, a D or L α-amino acid linked via the α-carboxyl group or optionally through the ω-carboxyl group when the amino acid is aspartic acid or glutamic acid or a peptide derived from D, L or mixed D and L amino acids linked through a carboxyl group;
  • [0116] Z₃ is hydrogen, an amino protecting group, —C₁-C₆ alkyl, —C(═O)—CH₃, benzyl, benzoyl, or —(CH₂)_n—N(H)Z₁;
  • [0117] each J is O, S or NH;
  • [0118] R₅ is a carbonyl protecting group; and
  • [0119] n is from 2 to about 50.

[0120] Another class of oligonucleotide mimetic that has been studied is based on linked morpholino units (morpholino nucleic acid) having heterocyclic bases attached to the morpholino ring. A number of linking groups have been reported that link the morpholino monomeric units in a morpholino nucleic acid. A preferred class of linking groups that have been used to link morpholino monomeric units have also been used to give a non-ionic oligonucleotide. The non-ionic morpholino-based oligonucleotides are less likely to have undesired interactions with cellular proteins. Morpholino-based oligonucleotides are non-ionic mimics of oligonucleotides and are less likely to form undesired interactions with cellular proteins (Dwaine A. Braasch and David R. Corey, Biochemistry, 2002, 41(14), 4503-4510). Morpholino-based oligonucleotides are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,506, issued Jul. 23, 1991. The morpholino class of oligonucleotides have been prepared having a variety of different linking groups joining the monomeric subunits.

[0121] Morpholino nucleic acids have been prepared having a variety of different linking groups (L₂) joining the monomeric subunits. The basic formula is shown below:

[0122]
wherein

• • [0123] T₁ is hydroxyl or a protected hydroxyl;
  • [0124] T₅ is hydrogen or a phosphate or phosphate derivative;
  • [0125] L₂ is a linking group; and
  • [0126] n is from 2 to about 50.

[0127] A further class of oligonucleotide mimetic is referred to as cyclohexenyl nucleic acids (CeNA). The furanose ring normally present in an DNA/RNA molecule is replaced with a cyclohenyl ring. CeNA DMT protected phosphoramidite monomers have been prepared and used for oligonucleotide synthesis following classical phosphoramidite chemistry. Fully modified CeNA oligonucleotides and oligonucleotides having specific positions modified with CeNA have been prepared and studied (see Wang et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 8595-8602). In general the incorporation of CeNA monomers into a DNA chain increases its stability of a DNA/RNA hybrid. CeNA oligoadenylates formed complexes with RNA and DNA complements with similar stability to the native complexes. The study of incorporating CeNA structures into natural nucleic acid structures was shown by NMR and circular dichroism to proceed with easy conformational adaptation. Furthermore the incorporation of CeNA into a sequence targeting RNA was stable to serum and able to activate E. Coli RNase resulting in cleavage of the target RNA strand.

[0128] The general formula of CeNA is shown below:

[0129]
wherein

• • [0130] each Bx is a heterocyclic base moiety;
  • [0131] T₁ is hydroxyl or a protected hydroxyl; and
  • [0132] T2 is hydroxyl or a protected hydroxyl.

[0133] Another class of oligonucleotide mimetic (anhydrohexitol nucleic acid) can be prepared from one or more anhydrohexitol nucleosides (see, Wouters and Herdewijn, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1999, 9, 1563-1566) and would have the general formula:

[0134]

[0135] A further preferred modification includes Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs) in which the 2′-hydroxyl group is linked to the 4′ carbon atom of the sugar ring thereby forming a 2′-C,4′-C-oxymethylene linkage thereby forming a bicyclic sugar moiety. The linkage is preferably a methylene (—CH₂—)_n group bridging the 2′ oxygen atom and the 4′ carbon atom wherein n is 1 or 2 (Singh et al., Chem. Commun., 1998, 4, 455-456). LNA and LNA analogs display very high duplex thermal stabilities with complementary DNA and RNA (Tm=+3 to +10 C), stability towards 3′-exonucleolytic degradation and good solubility properties. The basic structure of LNA showing the bicyclic ring system is shown below:

[0136]

[0137] The conformations of LNAs determined by 2D NMR spectroscopy have shown that the locked orientation of the LNA nucleotides, both in single-stranded LNA and in duplexes, constrains the phosphate backbone in such a way as to introduce a higher population of the N-type conformation (Petersen et al., J. Mol. Recognit., 2000, 13, 44-53). These conformations are associated with improved stacking of the nucleobases (Wengel et al., Nucleosides Nucleotides, 1999, 18, 1365-1370).

[0138] LNA has been shown to form exceedingly stable LNA:LNA duplexes (Koshkin et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 13252-13253). LNA:LNA hybridization was shown to be the most thermally stable nucleic acid type duplex system, and the RNA-mimicking character of LNA was established at the duplex level. Introduction of 3 LNA monomers (T or A) significantly increased melting points (Tm=+15/+11) toward DNA complements. The universality of LNA-mediated hybridization has been stressed by the formation of exceedingly stable LNA:LNA duplexes. The RNA-mimicking of LNA was reflected with regard to the N-type conformational restriction of the monomers and to the secondary structure of the LNA:RNA duplex.

[0139] LNAs also form duplexes with complementary DNA, RNA or LNA with high thermal affinities. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra show that duplexes involving fully modified LNA (esp. LNA:RNA) structurally resemble an A-form RNA:RNA duplex. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) examination of an LNA:DNA duplex confirmed the 3′-endo conformation of an LNA monomer. Recognition of double-stranded DNA has also been demonstrated suggesting strand invasion by LNA. Studies of mismatched sequences show that LNAs obey the Watson-Crick base pairing rules with generally improved selectivity compared to the corresponding unmodified reference strands.

[0140] Novel types of LNA-oligonucleotides, as well as the LNAs, are useful in a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Among these are antisense applications, PCR applications, strand-displacement oligomers, substrates for nucleic acid polymerases and generally as nucleotide based drugs.

[0141] Potent and nontoxic antisense oligonucleotides containing LNAs have been described (Wahlestedt et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2000, 97, 5633-5638.) The authors have demonstrated that LNAs confer several desired properties to antisense agents. LNA/DNA copolymers were not degraded readily in blood serum and cell extracts. LNA/DNA copolymers exhibited potent antisense activity in assay systems as disparate as G-protein-coupled receptor signaling in living rat brain and detection of reporter genes in Escherichia coli. Lipofectin-mediated efficient delivery of LNA into living human breast cancer cells has also been accomplished.

[0142] The synthesis and preparation of the LNA monomers adenine, cytosine, guanine, 5-methyl-cytosine, thymine and uracil, along with their oligomerization, and nucleic acid recognition properties have been described (Koshkin et al., Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 3607-3630). LNAs and preparation thereof are also described in WO 98/39352 and WO 99/14226.

[0143] The first analogs of LNA, phosphorothioate-LNA and 2′-thio-LNAs, have also been prepared (Kumar et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1998, 8, 2219-2222). Preparation of locked nucleoside analogs containing oligodeoxyribonucleotide duplexes as substrates for nucleic acid polymerases has also been described (Wengel et al., PCT International Application WO 98-DK393 19980914). Furthermore, synthesis of 2′-amino-LNA, a novel conformationally restricted high-affinity oligonucleotide analog with a handle has been described in the art (Singh et al., J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 10035-10039). In addition, 2′-Amino- and 2′-methylamino-LNA's have been prepared and the thermal stability of their duplexes with complementary RNA and DNA strands has been previously reported.

[0144] Further oligonucleotide mimetics have been prepared to incude bicyclic and tricyclic nucleoside analogs having the formulas (amidite monomers shown):

[0145]
(see Steffens et al., Helv. Chim. Acta, 1997, 80, 2426-2439; Steffens et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 3249-3255; and Renneberg et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 5993-6002). These modified nucleoside analogs have been oligomerized using the phosphoramidite approach and the resulting oligonucleotides containing tricyclic nucleoside analogs have shown increased thermal stabilities (Tm's) when hybridized to DNA, RNA and itself. Oligonucleotides containing bicyclic nucleoside analogs have shown thermal stabilities approaching that of DNA duplexes.

[0146] Another class of oligonucleotide mimetic is referred to as phosphonomonoester nucleic acids incorporate a phosphorus group in a backbone the backbone. This class of olignucleotide mimetic is reported to have useful physical and biological and pharmacological properties in the areas of inhibiting gene expression (antisense oligonucleotides, ribozymes, sense oligonucleotides and triplex-forming oligonucleotides), as probes for the detection of nucleic acids and as auxiliaries for use in molecular biology.

[0147] The general formula (for definitions of Markush variables see: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,874,553 and 6,127,346 herein incorporated by reference in their entirety) is shown below.

[0148]

[0149] Another oligonucleotide mimetic has been reported wherein the furanosyl ring has been replaced by a cyclobutyl moiety.

Modified Internucleoside Linkages

[0150] Specific examples of preferred oligomeric compounds useful in this invention include oligonucleotides containing modified e.g. non-naturally occurring internucleoside linkages. As defined in this specification, oligonucleotides having modified internucleoside linkages include internucleoside linkages that retain a phosphorus atom and internucleoside linkages that do not have a phosphorus atom. For the purposes of this specification, and as sometimes referenced in the art, modified oligonucleotides that do not have a phosphorus atom in their internucleoside backbone can also be considered to be oligonucleosides.

[0151] In the C. elegans system, modification of the internucleotide linkage (phosphorothioate) did not significantly interfere with RNAi activity. Based on this observation, it is suggested that certain preferred compositions of the invention can also have one or more modified internucleoside linkages. A preferred phosphorus containing modified internucleoside linkage is the phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage.

[0152] Preferred modified oligonucleotide backbones containing a phosphorus atom therein include, for example, phosphorothioates, chiral phosphorothioates, phosphoro-dithioates, phosphotriesters, aminoalkylphosphotriesters, methyl and other alkyl phosphonates including 3′-alkylene phosphonates, 5′-alkylene phosphonates and chiral phosphonates, phosphinates, phosphoramidates including 3′-amino phosphoramidate and aminoalkylphosphoramidates, thionophosphoramidates, thionoalkylphosphonates, thionoalkylphosphotriesters, selenophosphates and boranophosphates having normal 3′-5′ linkages, 2′-5′ linked analogs of these, and those having inverted polarity wherein one or more internucleotide linkages is a 3′ to 3′, 5′ to 5′ or 2′ to 2′ linkage. Preferred oligonucleotides having inverted polarity comprise a single 3′ to 3′ linkage at the 3′-most internucleotide linkage i.e. a single inverted nucleoside residue which may be abasic (the nucleobase is missing or has a hydroxyl group in place thereof). Various salts, mixed salts and free acid forms are also included.

[0153] Representative U.S. patents that teach the preparation of the above phosphorus-containing linkages include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,687,808; 4,469,863; 4,476,301; 5,023,243; 5,177,196; 5,188,897; 5,264,423; 5,276,019; 5,278,302; 5,286,717; 5,321,131; 5,399,676; 5,405,939; 5,453,496; 5,455,233; 5,466,677; 5,476,925; 5,519,126; 5,536,821; 5,541,306; 5,550,111; 5,563,253; 5,571,799; 5,587,361; 5,194,599; 5,565,555; 5,527,899; 5,721,218; 5,672,697 and 5,625,050, certain of which are commonly owned with this application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

[0154] In more preferred embodiments of the invention, oligonucleotides have one or more phosphorothioate and/or heteroatom internucleoside linkages, in particular —CH₂—NH—O—CH₂—, —CH₂—N(CH₃)—O—CH₂—[known as a methylene (methylimino) or MMI backbone], —CH₂—O—N(CH₃)—CH₂—, —CH₂—N(CH₃)—N(CH₃)—CH₂— and —O—N(CH₃)—CH₂—CH₂—[wherein the native phosphodiester internucleotide linkage is represented as —O—P(═O)(OH)—O—CH₂—]. The MMI type internucleoside linkages are disclosed in the above referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,677. Preferred amide internucleoside linkages are disclosed in the above referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,602,240.

[0155] Preferred modified oligonucleotide backbones that do not include a phosphorus atom therein have backbones that are formed by short chain alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, mixed heteroatom and alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, or one or more short chain heteroatomic or heterocyclic internucleoside linkages. These include those having morpholino linkages (formed in part from the sugar portion of a nucleoside); siloxane backbones; sulfide, sulfoxide and sulfone backbones; formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; methylene formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; riboacetyl backbones; alkene containing backbones; sulfamate backbones; methyleneimino and methylenehydrazino backbones; sulfonate and sulfonamide backbones; amide backbones; and others having mixed N, O, S and CH₂ component parts.

[0156] Representative U.S. patents that teach the preparation of the above oligonucleosides include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,034,506; 5,166,315; 5,185,444; 5,214,134; 5,216,141; 5,235,033; 5,264,562; 5,264,564; 5,405,938; 5,434,257; 5,466,677; 5,470,967; 5,489,677; 5,541,307; 5,561,225; 5,596,086; 5,602,240; 5,610,289; 5,602,240; 5,608,046; 5,610,289; 5,618,704; 5,623,070; 5,663,312; 5,633,360; 5,677,437; 5,792,608; 5,646,269 and 5,677,439, certain of which are commonly owned with this application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

Modified Sugars

[0157] In addition to having at least one alternating motif the compositions of the present invention may also contain additional modified sugar moieties. Preferred modified sugar moieties comprise a sugar substituent group, which is normally attached to the 2′-position but alternatively can be attached to the 3′, 4′ or 5′-position, selected from: OH; F; O—, S—, or N-alkyl; O—, S—, or N-alkenyl; O—, S— or N-alkynyl; or O-alkyl-O-alkyl, wherein the alkyl, alkenyl and alkynyl may be substituted or unsubstituted C₁ to C₁₀ alkyl or C₂ to C₁₀ alkenyl and alkynyl. Particularly preferred are O[(CH₂)_nO]_mCH₃, O(CH₂)_nOCH₃, O(CH₂)_nNH₂, O(CH₂)_nCH₃, O(CH₂)_nONH₂, and O(CH₂)_nON[(CH₂)_nCH₃]₂, where n and m are from 1 to about 10. Other preferred sugar substituent groups include: C₁ to C₁₀ lower alkyl, substituted lower alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, alkaryl, aralkyl, O-alkaryl or O-aralkyl, SH, SCH₃, OCN, Cl, Br, CN, CF₃, OCF₃, SOCH₃, SO₂CH₃, ONO₂, NO₂, N₃, NH₂, heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkaryl, aminoalkylamino, polyalkylamino, substituted silyl, an RNA cleaving group, a reporter group, an intercalator, a group for improving the pharmacokinetic properties of an oligonucleotide, or a group for improving the pharmacodynamic properties of an oligonucleotide, and other substituents having similar properties. A preferred modification includes 2′-methoxyethoxy (2′-O—CH₂CH₂OCH₃, also known as 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) or 2′-MOE) (Martin et al., Helv. Chim. Acta, 1995, 78, 486-504) i.e., an alkoxyalkoxy group. A further preferred modification includes 2′-dimethylaminooxyethoxy, i.e., a O(CH₂)₂ON(CH₃)₂ group, also known as 2′-DMAOE, as described in examples hereinbelow, and 2′-dimethylaminoethoxyethoxy (also known in the art as 2′-O-dimethyl-amino-ethoxy-ethyl or 2′-DMAEOE), i.e., 2′-O-CH2OCH₂N(CH₃)₂.

[0158] Other preferred sugar substituent groups include methoxy (—O—CH₃), aminopropoxy (—OCH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂), allyl (—CH₂—CH═CH₂), —O-allyl (—O—CH₂—CH═CH₂) and fluoro (F). 2′-Sugar substituent groups may be in the arabino (up) position or ribo (down) position. A preferred 2′-arabino modification is 2′-F. Similar modifications may also be made at other positions on the oligomeric compoiund, particularly the 3′ position of the sugar on the 3′ terminal nucleoside or in 2′-5′ linked oligonucleotides and the 5′ position of 5′ terminal nucleotide. Oligonucleotides may also have sugar mimetics such as cyclobutyl moieties in place of the pentofuranosyl sugar. Representative U.S. patents that teach the preparation of such modified sugar structures include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,981,957; 5,118,800; 5,319,080; 5,359,044; 5,393,878; 5,446,137; 5,466,786; 5,514,785; 5,519,134; 5,567,811; 5,576,427; 5,591,722; 5,597,909; 5,610,300; 5,627,053; 5,639,873; 5,646,265; 5,658,873; 5,670,633; 5,792,747; and 5,700,920, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

[0159] Further representative sugar substituent groups include groups of formula I_a or II_a:

[0160]
wherein:

• • [0161] R_b is O, S or NH;
  • [0162] R_d is a single bond, O, S or C(═O);
  • [0163] R_e is C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, N(R_k)(R_m), N(R_k)(R_n), N═C(R_p)(R_q), N═C(R_p)(R_r) or has formula III_a;

[0164]

• • [0165] IIIa
  • [0166] R_p and R_q are each independently hydrogen or C₁-C₁₀ alkyl;
  • [0167] R_r is —R_x—R_y;
  • [0168] each R_s, R_t, R_u and R_v is, independently, hydrogen, C(O)R_w, substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl, alkylsulfonyl, arylsulfonyl, a chemical functional group or a conjugate group, wherein the substituent groups are selected from hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy, carboxy, benzyl, phenyl, nitro, thiol, thioalkoxy, halogen, alkyl, aryl, alkenyl and alkynyl;
  • [0169] or optionally, R_u and R_v, together form a phthalimido moiety with the nitrogen atom to which they are attached;
  • [0170] each R_w is, independently, substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, trifluoromethyl, cyanoethyloxy, methoxy, ethoxy, t-butoxy, allyloxy, 9-fluorenylmethoxy, 2-(trimethylsilyl)-ethoxy, 2,2,2-trichloroethoxy, benzyloxy, butyryl, iso-butyryl, phenyl or aryl;
  • [0171] R_k is hydrogen, a nitrogen protecting group or —R_x—R_y;
  • [0172] R_p is hydrogen, a nitrogen protecting group or —R_x—R_y;
  • [0173] R_x is a bond or a linking moiety;
  • [0174] R_y is a chemical functional group, a conjugate group or a solid support medium;
  • [0175] each R_m and R_n is, independently, H, a nitrogen protecting group, substituted or unsubstituted C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkenyl, substituted or unsubstituted C₂-C₁₀ alkynyl, wherein the substituent groups are selected from hydroxyl, amino, alkoxy, carboxy, benzyl, phenyl, nitro, thiol, thioalkoxy, halogen, alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, alkynyl; NH₃⁺, N(R_u)(R_v), guanidino and acyl where said acyl is an acid amide or an ester;
  • [0176] or R_m and R_n, together, are a nitrogen protecting group, are joined in a ring structure that optionally includes an additional heteroatom selected from N and O or are a chemical functional group;
  • [0177] R_i is OR_z, SR_z, or N(R_z)₂;
  • [0178] each R_z is, independently, H, C₁-C₈ alkyl, C₁-C₈ haloalkyl, C(═NH)N(H)R_u, C(═O)N(H)R_u or OC(═O)N(H)R_u;
  • [0179] R_f, R_g and R_h comprise a ring system having from about 4 to about 7 carbon atoms or having from about 3 to about 6 carbon atoms and 1 or 2 heteroatoms wherein said heteroatoms are selected from oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur and wherein said ring system is aliphatic, unsaturated aliphatic, aromatic, or saturated or unsaturated heterocyclic;
  • [0180] R_j is alkyl or haloalkyl having 1 to about 10 carbon atoms, alkenyl having 2 to about 10 carbon atoms, alkynyl having 2 to about 10 carbon atoms, aryl having 6 to about 14 carbon atoms, N(R_k)(R_m) OR_k, halo, SR_k or CN;
  • [0181] m_a is 1 to about 10;
  • [0182] each mb is, independently, 0 or 1;
  • [0183] mc is 0 or an integer from 1 to 10;
  • [0184] md is an integer from 1 to 10;
  • [0185] me is from 0, 1 or 2; and
  • [0186] provided that when mc is 0, md is greater than 1.

[0187] Representative substituents groups of Formula I are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/130,973, filed Aug. 7, 1998, entitled “Capped 2′-Oxyethoxy Oligonucleotides,” hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

[0188] Representative cyclic substituent groups of Formula II are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/123,108, filed Jul. 27, 1998, entitled “RNA Targeted 2′-Oligonucleotides that are Conformationally Preorganized,” hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

[0189] Particularly preferred sugar substituent groups include O[(CH₂)_nO]_mCH₃, O(CH₂)_nOCH₃, O(CH₂)_nNH₂, O(CH₂)_nCH₃, O(CH₂)_nONH₂, and O(CH₂)_nON[(CH₂)_nCH₃)]₂, where n and m are from 1 to about 10.

[0190] Representative guanidino substituent groups that are shown in formula III and IV are disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/349,040, entitled “Functionalized Oligomers”, filed Jul. 7, 1999, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

[0191] Representative acetamido substituent groups are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,147,200 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

[0192] Representative dimethylaminoethyloxyethyl substituent groups are disclosed in International Patent Application PCT/US99/17895, entitled “2′-O-Dimethylaminoethyloxyethyl-Oligonucleotides”, filed Aug. 6, 1999, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Modified Nucleobases/Naturally Occurring Nucleobases

[0193] Oligomeric compounds may also include nucleosides or other surrogate or mimetic monomeric subunits that include a nucleobase (often referred to in the art simply as “base” or “heterocyclic base moiety”). The nucleobase is another moiety that has been extensively modified or substituted and such modified and or substituted nucleobases are amenable to the present invention. As used herein, “unmodified” or “natural” nucleobases include the purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G), and the pyrimidine bases thymine (T), cytosine (C) and uracil (U). Modified nucleobases also referred herein as heterocyclic base moieties include other synthetic and natural nucleobases such as 5-methylcytosine (5-me-C), 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine, xanthine, hypoxanthine, 2-aminoadenine, 6-methyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-propyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-thiouracil, 2-thiothymine and 2-thiocytosine, 5-halouracil and cytosine, 5-propynyl (—C≡C—CH₃) uracil and cytosine and other alkynyl derivatives of pyrimidine bases, 6-azo uracil, cytosine and thymine, 5-uracil (pseudouracil), 4-thiouracil, 8-halo, 8-amino, 8-thiol, 8-thioalkyl, 8-hydroxyl and other 8-substituted adenines and guanines, 5-halo particularly 5-bromo, 5-trifluoromethyl and other 5-substituted uracils and cytosines, 7-methylguanine and 7-methyladenine, 2-F-adenine, 2-amino-adenine, 8-azaguanine and 8-azaadenine, 7-deazaguanine and 7-deazaadenine and 3-deazaguanine and 3-deazaadenine.

[0194] Nucleobases may also include those in which the purine or pyrimidine base is replaced with other heterocycles, for example 7-deaza-adenine, 7-deazaguanosine, 2-aminopyridine and 2-pyridone. Further nucleobases include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808, those disclosed in The Concise Encyclopedia Of Polymer Science And Engineering, pages 858-859, Kroschwitz, J. I., ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1990, those disclosed by Englisch et al., Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 1991, 30, 613, and those disclosed by Sanghvi, Y. S., Chapter 15, Antisense Research and Applications, pages 289-302, Crooke, S. T. and Lebleu, B., ed., CRC Press, 1993. Certain of these nucleobases are particularly useful for increasing the binding affinity of the compositions of the invention. These include 5-substituted pyrimidines, 6-azapyrimidines and N-2, N-6 and O-6 substituted purines, including 2 aminopropyladenine, 5-propynyluracil and 5-propynylcytosine. 5 methylcytosine substitutions have been shown to increase nucleic acid duplex stability by 0.6-1.2° C. (Sanghvi, Y. S., Crooke, S. T. and Lebleu, B., eds., Antisense Research and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993, pp. 276-278) and are presently preferred base substitutions, even more particularly when combined with 2′-O-methoxyethyl sugar modifications.

[0195] Oligomeric compounds of the present invention can also include polycyclic heterocyclic compounds in place of one or more heterocyclic base moieties. A number of tricyclic heterocyclic comounds have been previously reported. These compounds are routinely used in antisense applications to increase the binding properties of the modified strand to a target strand. The most studied modifications are targeted to guanosines hence they have been termed G-clamps or cytidine analogs. Many of these polycyclic heterocyclic compounds have the general formula:

[0196]

[0197] Representative cytosine analogs that make 3 hydrogen bonds with a guanosine in a second strand include 1,3-diazaphenoxazine-2-one (R₁₀₌O, R₁₁- R₁₄═H) [Kurchavov, et al., Nucleosides and Nucleotides, 1997, 16, 1837-1846], 1,3-diazaphenothiazine-2-one (R₁₀═S, R₁₁-R₁₄═H), [Lin, K.-Y.; Jones, R. J.; Matteucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3873-3874] and 6,7,8,9-tetrafluoro-1,3-diazaphenoxazine-2-one (R₁₀═O, R₁₁-R₁₄═F) [Wang, J.; Lin, K.-Y., Matteucci, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8385-8388]. Incorporated into oligonucleotides these base modifications were shown to hybridize with complementary guanine and the latter was also shown to hybridize with adenine and to enhance helical thermal stability by extended stacking interactions(also see U.S. Patent Application entitled “Modified Peptide Nucleic Acids” filed May 24, 2002, Ser. No. 10/155,920; and U.S. Patent Application entitled “Nuclease Resistant Chimeric Oligonucleotides” filed May 24, 2002, Ser. No. 10/013,295, both of which are commonly owned with this application and are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety).

[0198] Further helix-stabilizing properties have been observed when a cytosine analog/substitute has an aminoethoxy moiety attached to the rigid 1,3-diazaphenoxazine-2-one scaffold (R₁₀₌O, R₁₁═—O—(CH₂)₂—NH₂, R_12-14═H) [Lin, K.-Y.; Matteucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8531-8532]. Binding studies demonstrated that a single incorporation could enhance the binding affinity of a model oligonucleotide to its complementary target DNA or RNA with a ΔT_m of up to 18° relative to 5-methyl cytosine (dC5^me), which is the highest known affinity enhancement for a single modification, yet. On the other hand, the gain in helical stability does not compromise the specificity of the oligonucleotides. The T_m data indicate an even greater discrimination between the perfect match and mismatched sequences compared to dC5^me. It was suggested that the tethered amino group serves as an additional hydrogen bond donor to interact with the Hoogsteen face, namely the O6, of a complementary guanine thereby forming 4 hydrogen bonds. This means that the increased affinity of G-clamp is mediated by the combination of extended base stacking and additional specific hydrogen bonding.

[0199] Further tricyclic heterocyclic compounds and methods of using them that are amenable to the present invention are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,028,183, which issued on May 22, 2000, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,007,992, which issued on Dec. 28, 1999, the contents of both are commonly assigned with this application and are incorporated herein in their entirety.

[0200] The enhanced binding affinity of the phenoxazine derivatives together with their uncompromised sequence specificity makes them valuable nucleobase analogs for the development of more potent antisense-based drugs. In fact, promising data have been derived from in vitro experiments demonstrating that heptanucleotides containing phenoxazine substitutions are capable to activate RNaseH, enhance cellular uptake and exhibit an increased antisense activity [Lin, K-Y; Matteucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8531-8532]. The activity enhancement was even more pronounced in case of G-clamp, as a single substitution was shown to significantly improve the in vitro potency of a 20mer 2′-deoxyphosphorothioate oligonucleotides [Flanagan, W. M.; Wolf, J. J.; Olson, P.; Grant, D.; Lin, K.-Y.; Wagner, R. W.; Matteucci, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, 96, 3513-3518]. Nevertheless, to optimize oligonucleotide design and to better understand the impact of these heterocyclic modifications on the biological activity, it is important to evaluate their effect on the nuclease stability of the oligomers.

[0201] Further modified polycyclic heterocyclic compounds useful as nucleobases are disclosed in but not limited to, the above noted U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808, as well as U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,845,205; 5,130,302; 5,134,066; 5,175,273; 5,367,066; 5,432,272; 5,434,257; 5,457,187; 5,459,255; 5,484,908; 5,502,177; 5,525,711; 5,552,540; 5,587,469; 5,594,121, 5,596,091; 5,614,617; 5,645,985; 5,646,269; 5,750,692; 5,830,653; 5,763,588; 6,005,096; and 5,681,941, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/996,292 filed Nov. 28, 2001, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

Conjugates

[0202] Oligomeric compounds used in the compositions of the present invention can also be modified to have one or more moieties or conjugates which enhance their activity, cellular distribution or cellular uptake. In one embodiment such modified oligomeric compounds are prepared by covalently attaching conjugate groups to functional groups such as hydroxyl or amino groups. Conjugate groups of the invention include intercalators, reporter molecules, polyamines, polyamides, polyethylene glycols, polyethers, groups that enhance the pharmacodynamic properties of oligomers, and groups that enhance the pharmacokinetic properties of oligomers. Typical conjugates groups include cholesterols, lipids, phospholipids, biotin, phenazine, folate, phenanthridine, anthraquinone, acridine, fluoresceins, rhodamines, coumarins, and dyes. Groups that enhance the pharmacodynamic properties, in the context of this invention, include groups that improve oligomer uptake, enhance oligomer resistance to degradation, and/or strengthen sequence-specific hybridization with RNA. Groups that enhance the pharmacokinetic properties, in the context of this invention, include groups that improve oligomer uptake, distribution, metabolism or excretion. Representative conjugate groups are disclosed in International Patent Application PCT/US92/09196, filed Oct. 23, 1992 the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Conjugate moieties include but are not limited to lipid moieties such as a cholesterol moiety (Letsinger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1989, 86, 6553-6556), cholic acid (Manoharan et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Let., 1994, 4, 1053-1060), a thioether, e.g., hexyl-S-tritylthiol (Manoharan et al., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1992, 660, 306-309; Manoharan et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Let., 1993, 3, 2765-2770), a thiocholesterol (Oberhauser et al., Nucl. Acids Res., 1992, 20, 533-538), an aliphatic chain, e.g., dodecandiol or undecyl residues (Saison-Behmoaras et al., EMBO J., 1991, 10, 1111-1118; Kabanov et al., FEBS Lett., 1990, 259, 327-330; Svinarchuk et al., Biochimie, 1993, 75, 49-54), a phospholipid, e.g., di-hexadecyl-rac-glycerol or triethylammonium 1,2-di-O-hexadecyl-rac-glycero-3-H-phosphonate (Manoharan et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 3651-3654; Shea et al., Nucl. Acids Res., 1990, 18, 3777-3783), a polyamine or a polyethylene glycol chain (Manoharan et al., Nucleosides & Nucleotides, 1995, 14, 969-973), or adamantane acetic acid (Manoharan et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 3651-3654), a palmityl moiety (Mishra et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1995, 1264, 229-237), or an octadecylamine or hexylamino-carbonyl-oxycholesterol moiety (Crooke et al., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 1996, 277, 923-937.

[0203] The compositions of the invention may also be conjugated to active drug substances, for example, aspirin, warfarin, phenylbutazone, ibuprofen, suprofen, fenbufen, ketoprofen, (S)-(+)-pranoprofen, carprofen, dansylsarcosine, 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid, flufenamic acid, folinic acid, a benzothiadiazide, chlorothiazide, a diazepine, indomethicin, a barbiturate, a cephalosporin, a sulfa drug, an antidiabetic, an antibacterial or an antibiotic. Oligonucleotide-drug conjugates and their preparation are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/334,130 (filed Jun. 15, 1999), incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

[0204] Representative U.S. patents that teach the preparation of such oligonucleotide conjugates include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,828,979; 4,948,882; 5,218,105; 5,525,465; 5,541,313; 5,545,730; 5,552,538; 5,578,717, 5,580,731; 5,580,731; 5,591,584; 5,109,124; 5,118,802; 5,138,045; 5,414,077; 5,486,603; 5,512,439; 5,578,718; 5,608,046; 4,587,044; 4,605,735; 4,667,025; 4,762,779; 4,789,737; 4,824,941; 4,835,263; 4,876,335; 4,904,582; 4,958,013; 5,082,830; 5,112,963; 5,214,136; 5,082,830; 5,112,963; 5,214,136; 5,245,022; 5,254,469; 5,258,506; 5,262,536; 5,272,250; 5,292,873; 5,317,098; 5,371,241, 5,391,723; 5,416,203, 5,451,463; 5,510,475; 5,512,667; 5,514,785; 5,565,552; 5,567,810; 5,574,142; 5,585,481; 5,587,371; 5,595,726; 5,597,696; 5,599,923; 5,599,928 and 5,688,941, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

[0205] Oligomeric compounds used in the compositions of the present invention can also be modified to have one or more stabilizing groups that are generally attached to one or both termini of oligomeric compounds to enhance properties such as for example nuclease stability. Included in stabilizing groups are cap structures. By “cap structure or terminal cap moiety” is meant chemical modifications, which have been incorporated at either terminus of oligonucleotides (see for example Wincott et al., WO 97/26270, incorporated by reference herein). These terminal modifications protect the oligomeric compounds having terminal nucleic acid molecules from exonuclease degradation, and can help in delivery and/or localization within a cell. The cap can be present at the 5′-terminus (5′-cap) or at the 3′-terminus (3′-cap) or can be present on both termini. In non-limiting examples, the 5′-cap includes inverted abasic residue (moiety), 4′, 5′-methylene nucleotide; 1-(beta-D-erythrofuranosyl) nucleotide, 4′-thio nucleotide, carbocyclic nucleotide; 1,5-anhydrohexitol nucleotide; L-nucleotides; alpha-nucleotides; modified base nucleotide; phosphorodithioate linkage; threo-pentofuranosyl nucleotide; acyclic 3′,4′-seco nucleotide; acyclic 3,4-dihydroxybutyl nucleotide; acyclic 3,5-dihydroxypentyl riucleotide, 3′-3′-inverted nucleotide moiety; 3′-3′-inverted abasic moiety; 3′-2′-inverted nucleotide moiety; 3′-2′-inverted abasic moiety; 1,4-butanediol phosphate; 3′-phosphoramidate; hexylphosphate; aminohexyl phosphate; 3′-phosphate; 3′-phosphorothioate; phosphorodithioate; or bridging or non-bridging methylphosphonate moiety (for more details see Wincott et al., International PCT publication No. WO 97/26270, incorporated by reference herein).

[0206] Particularly preferred 3′-cap structures of the present invention include, for example 4′,5′-methylene nucleotide; 1-(beta-D-erythrofuranosyl) nucleotide; 4′-thio nucleotide, carbocyclic nucleotide; 5′-amino-alkyl phosphate; 1,3-diamino-2-propyl phosphate, 3-aminopropyl phosphate; 6-aminohexyl phosphate; 1,2-aminododecyl phosphate; hydroxypropyl phosphate; 1,5-anhydrohexitol nucleotide; L-nucleotide; alpha-nucleotide; modified base nucleotide; phosphorodithioate; threo-pentofuranosyl nucleotide; acyclic 3′,4′-seco nucleotide; 3,4-dihydroxybutyl nucleotide; 3,5-dihydroxypentyl nucleotide, 5′-5′-inverted nucleotide moiety; 5′-5′-inverted abasic moiety; 5′-phosphoramidate; 5′-phosphorothioate; 1,4-butanediol phosphate; 5′-amino; bridging and/or non-bridging 5′-phosphoramidate, phosphorothioate and/or phosphorodithioate, bridging or non bridging methylphosphonate and 5′-mercapto moieties (for more details see Beaucage and Tyer, 1993, Tetrahedron 49, 1925; incorporated by reference herein).

3′-Endo Modifications

[0207] In one aspect of the present invention oligomeric compounds include nucleosides that are chemically modified to induce a 3′-endo sugar conformation. A nucleoside can have a chemical modification of the nucleobase, the sugar moiety or both to induce a 3′-endo sugar conformation. These modified nucleosides are used to mimic RNA like nucleosides so that particular properties of an oligomeric compound especially an oligonucleotide can be enhanced while maintaining the desirable 3′-endo conformational geometry. There is an apparent preference for an RNA type duplex (A form helix, predominantly 3′-endo) as a requirement of RNA interference which is supported in part by the fact that duplexes composed of 2′-deoxy-2′-F-nucleosides appear efficient in triggering RNAi response in the C. elegans system. Properties that are enhanced by using more stable 3′-endo nucleosides include but aren't limited to modulation of pharmacokinetic properties through modification of protein binding, protein off-rate, absorption and clearance; modulation of nuclease stability as well as chemical stability; modulation of the binding affinity and specificity of the oligomer (affinity and specificity for enzymes as well as for complementary sequences); and increasing efficacy of RNA cleavage. The present invention includes oligomeric compounds having at least one 2′-O-methyl modified nucleoside and further comprising additional nucleosides that are modified in such a way as to favor a C3′-endo type conformation.

[0208]

[0209] Nucleoside conformation is influenced by various factors including substitution at the 2′, 3′ or 4′-positions of the pentofuranosyl sugar. Electronegative substituents generally prefer the axial positions, while sterically demanding substituents generally prefer the equatorial positions (Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, Wolfgang Sanger, 1984, Springer-Verlag.) Modification of the 2′ position to favor the 3′-endo conformation can be achieved while maintaining the 2′-OH as a recognition element, as illustrated in FIG. 2, below (Gallo et al., Tetrahedron (2001), 57, 5707-5713. Harry-O'kuru et al., J. Org. Chem., (1997), 62(6), 1754-1759 and Tang et al., J. Org. Chem. (1999), 64, 747-754.) Alternatively, preference for the 3′-endo conformation can be achieved by deletion of the 2′-OH as exemplified by 2′deoxy-2F-nucleosides (Kawasaki et al., J. Med. Chem. (1993), 36, 831-841), which adopts the 3′-endo conformation positioning the electronegative fluorine atom in the axial position. Other modifications of the ribose ring, for example substitution at the 4′-position to give 4′-F modified nucleosides (Guillerm et al., Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters (1995), 5, 1455-1460 and Owen et al., J. Org. Chem. (1976), 41, 3010-3017), or for example modification to yield methanocarba nucleoside analogs (Jacobson et al., J. Med. Chem. Lett. (2000), 43, 2196-2203 and Lee et al., Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2001), 11, 1333-1337) also induce preference for the 3′-endo conformation. Some modifications actually lock the conformational geometry by formation of a bicyclic sugar moiety e.g. locked nucleic acid (LNA, Singh et al, Chem. Commun. (1998), 4, 455-456), and ethylene bridged nucleic acids (ENA, Morita et al, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2002), 12, 73-76.)

[0210] Examples of modified nucleosides amenable to the present invention are shown below in Table I. These examples are meant to be representative and not exhaustive.

[0211]

TABLE I

[0212] The preferred conformation of modified nucleosides and their oligomers can be estimated by various methods such as molecular dynamics calculations, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and CD measurements. Hence, modifications predicted to induce RNA like conformations, A-form duplex geometry in an oligomeric context, are selected for use in one or more of the oligonucleotides of the present invention. The synthesis of numerous of the modified nucleosides amenable to the present invention are known in the art (see for example, Chemistry of Nucleosides and Nucleotides Vol 1-3, ed. Leroy B. Townsend, 1988, Plenum press., and the examples section below.) Nucleosides known to be inhibitors/substrates for RNA dependent RNA polymerases (for example HCV NS5B

[0213] In one aspect, the present invention is directed to oligonucleotides that are prepared having enhanced properties compared to native RNA against nucleic acid targets. A target is identified and an oligonucleotide is selected having an effective length and sequence that is complementary to a portion of the target sequence. Each nucleoside of the selected sequence is scrutinized for possible enhancing modifications. A preferred modification would be the replacement of one or more RNA nucleosides with nucleosides that have the same 3′-endo conformational geometry. Such modifications can enhance chemical and nuclease stability relative to native RNA while at the same time being much cheaper and easier to synthesize and/or incorporate into an oligonucleotide. The selected sequence can be further divided into regions and the nucleosides of each region evaluated for enhancing modifications that can be the result of a chimeric configuration. Consideration is also given to the termini (e.g. 5′ and 3′-termini) as there are often advantageous modifications that can be made to one or more of the terminal monomeric subunits. In one aspect of the invention, desired properties and or activity of oligonucleotides are enhanced by the inclusion of a 5′-phosphate or modified phosphate moiety.

[0214] The terms used to describe the conformational geometry of homoduplex nucleic acids are “A Form” for RNA and “B Form” for DNA. The respective conformational geometry for RNA and DNA duplexes was determined from X-ray diffraction analysis of nucleic acid fibers (Amott and Hukins, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 1970, 47, 1504.) In general, RNA:RNA duplexes are more stable and have higher melting temperatures (Tm's) than DNA:DNA duplexes (Sanger et al., Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, 1984, Springer-Verlag; New York, N.Y.; Lesnik et al., Biochemistry, 1995, 34, 10807-10815; Conte et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1997, 25, 2627-2634). The increased stability of RNA has been attributed to several structural features, most notably the improved base stacking interactions that result from an A-form geometry (Searle et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1993, 21, 2051-2056). The presence of the 2′hydroxyl in RNA biases the sugar toward a C3′ endo pucker, i.e., also designated as Northern pucker, which causes the duplex to favor the A-form geometry. In addition, the 2′ hydroxyl groups of RNA can form a network of water mediated hydrogen bonds that help stabilize the RNA duplex (Egli et al., Biochemistry, 1996, 35, 8489-8494). On the other hand, deoxy nucleic acids prefer a C2′ endo sugar pucker, i.e., also known as Southern pucker, which is thought to impart a less stable B-form geometry (Sanger, W. (1984) Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.). As used herein, B-form geometry is inclusive of both C2′-endo pucker and O4′-endo pucker. This is consistent with Berger, et. al., Nucleic Acids Research, 1998, 26, 2473-2480, who pointed out that in considering the furanose conformations which give rise to B-form duplexes consideration should also be given to a O4′-endo pucker contribution.

[0215] DNA:RNA hybrid duplexes, however, are usually less stable than pure RNA:RNA duplexes, and depending on their sequence may be either more or less stable than DNA:DNA duplexes (Searle et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1993, 21, 2051-2056). The structure of a hybrid duplex is intermediate between A- and B-form geometries, which may result in poor stacking interactions (Lane et al., Eur. J. Biochem., 1993, 215, 297-306; Fedoroff et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1993, 233, 509-523; Gonzalez et al., Biochemistry, 1995, 34, 4969-4982; Horton et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1996, 264, 521-533). The stability of the duplex formed between a target RNA and a synthetic sequence is central to therapies such as but not limited to antisense and RNA interference as these mechanisms require the binding of a synthetic strand of oligonucleotide to an RNA target strand. In the case of antisense, effective inhibition of the MRNA requires that the antisense DNA have a very high binding affinity with the mRNA. Otherwise the desired interaction between the synthetic strand and target MRNA strand will occur infrequently, resulting in decreased efficacy.

[0216] One routinely used method of modifying the sugar puckering is the substitution of the sugar at the 2′-position with a substituent group that influences the sugar geometry. The influence on ring conformation is dependant on the nature of the substituent at the 2′-position. A number of different substituents have been studied to determine their sugar puckering effect. For example, 2′-halogens have been studied showing that the 2′-fluoro derivative exhibits the largest population (65%) of the C3′-endo form, and the 2′-iodo exhibits the lowest population (7%). The populations of adenosine (2′-OH) versus deoxyadenosine (2′-H) are 36% and 19%, respectively. Furthermore, the effect of the 2′-fluoro group of adenosine dimers (2′-deoxy-2′-fluoroadenosine-2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-adenosine) is further correlated to the stabilization of the stacked conformation.

[0217] As expected, the relative duplex stability can be enhanced by replacement of 2′-OH groups with 2′-F groups thereby increasing the C3′-endo population. It is assumed that the highly polar nature of the 2′-F bond and the extreme preference for C3′-endo puckering may stabilize the stacked conformation in an A-form duplex. Data from UV hypochromicity, circular dichroism, and ¹H NMR also indicate that the degree of stacking decreases as the electronegativity of the halo substituent decreases. Furthermore, steric bulk at the 2′-position of the sugar moiety is better accommodated in an A-form duplex than a B-form duplex. Thus, a 2′-substituent on the 3′-terminus of a dinucleoside monophosphate is thought to exert a number of effects on the stacking conformation: steric repulsion, furanose puckering preference, electrostatic repulsion, hydrophobic attraction, and hydrogen bonding capabilities. These substituent effects are thought to be determined by the molecular size, electronegativity, and hydrophobicity of the substituent. Melting temperatures of complementary strands is also increased with the 2′-substituted adenosine diphosphates. It is not clear whether the 3′-endo preference of the conformation or the presence of the substituent is responsible for the increased binding. However, greater overlap of adjacent bases (stacking) can be achieved with the 3′-endo conformation.

[0218] One synthetic 2′-modification that imparts increased nuclease resistance and a very high binding affinity to nucleotides is the 2-methoxyethoxy (2′-MOE, 2′-OCH₂CH₂OCH₃) side chain (Baker et al., J. Biol. Chem., 1997, 272, 11944-12000). One of the immediate advantages of the 2′-MOE substitution is the improvement in binding affinity, which is greater than many similar 2′ modifications such as O-methyl, O-propyl, and O-aminopropyl. Oligonucleotides having the 2′-O-methoxyethyl substituent also have been shown to be antisense inhibitors of gene expression with promising features for in vivo use (Martin, P., Helv. Chim. Acta, 1995, 78, 486-504; Altmann et al., Chimia, 1996, 50, 168-176; Altmann et al., Biochem. Soc. Trans., 1996, 24, 630-637; and Altmann et al., Nucleosides Nucleotides, 1997, 16, 917-926). Relative to DNA, the oligonucleotides having the 2′-MOE modification displayed improved RNA affinity and higher nuclease resistance. Chimeric oligonucleotides having 2′-MOE substituents in the wing nucleosides and an internal region of deoxy-phosphorothioate nucleotides (also termed a gapped oligonucleotide or gapmer) have shown effective reduction in the growth of tumors in animal models at low doses. 2′-MOE substituted oligonucleotides have also shown outstanding promise as antisense agents in several disease states. One such MOE substituted oligonucleotide is presently being investigated in clinical trials for the treatment of CMV retinitis.

[0219] To better understand the higher RNA affinity of 2′-O-methoxyethyl substituted RNA and to examine the conformational properties of the 2′-O-methoxyethyl substituent, two dodecamer oligonucleotides were synthesized having SEQ ID NO: 54 (CGC GAA UUC GCG) and SEQ ID NO: 55 (GCG CUU AAG CGC). These self-complementary strands have every 2′-position modified with a 2′-O-methoxyethyl. The duplex was crystallized at a resolution of 1.7 Ångstrom and the crystal structure was determined. The conditions used for the crystallization were 2 mM oligonucleotide, 50 mM Na Hepes pH 6.2-7.5, 10.50 mM MgCl₂, 15% PEG 400. The crystal data showed: space group C2, cell constants a=41.2 Å, b=34.4 Å, c=46.6 Å,=92.4°. The resolution was 1.7 Å at −170° C. The current R=factor was 20% (R_free 26%).

[0220] This crystal structure is believed to be the first crystal structure of a fully modified RNA oligonucleotide analogue. The duplex adopts an overall A-form conformation and all modified sugars display C3′-endo pucker. In most of the 2′-O-substituents, the torsion angle around the A′-B′ bond, as depicted in Structure II below, of the ethylene glycol linker has a gauche conformation. For 2′-O-MOE, A′ and B′ of Structure II below are methylene moieties of the ethyl portion of the MOE and R′ is the methoxy portion.

[0221]

[0222] In the crystal, the 2′-O-MOE RNA duplex adopts a general orientation such that the crystallographic 2-fold rotation axis does not coincide with the molecular 2-fold rotation axis. The duplex adopts the expected A-type geometry and all of the 24 2′-O-MOE substituents were visible in the electron density maps at full resolution. The electron density maps as well as the temperature factors of substituent atoms indicate flexibility of the 2′-O-MOE substituent in some cases.

[0223] Most of the 2′-O-MOE substituents display a gauche conformation around the C—C bond of the ethyl linker. However, in two cases, a trans conformation around the C—C bond is observed. The lattice interactions in the crystal include packing of duplexes against each other via their minor grooves. Therefore, for some residues, the conformation of the 2′-O-substituent is affected by contacts to an adjacent duplex. In general, variations in the conformation of the substituents (e.g. g⁺ or g⁻ around the C—C bonds) create a range of interactions between substituents, both inter-strand, across the minor groove, and intra-strand. At one location, atoms of substituents from two residues are in van der Waals contact across the minor groove. Similarly, a close contact occurs between atoms of substituents from two adjacent intra-strand residues.

[0224] Previously determined crystal structures of A-DNA duplexes were for those that incorporated isolated 2′-O-methyl T residues. In the crystal structure noted above for the 2′-O-MOE substituents, a conserved hydration pattern has been observed for the 2′-O-MOE residues. A single water molecule is seen located between O2′, O3′ and the methoxy oxygen atom of the substituent, forming contacts to all three of between 2.9 and 3.4 Å. In addition, oxygen atoms of substituents are involved in several other hydrogen bonding contacts. For example, the methoxy oxygen atom of a particular 2′-O-substituent forms a hydrogen bond to N3 of an adenosine from the opposite strand via a bridging water molecule.

[0225] In several cases a water molecule is trapped between the oxygen atoms O2′, O3′ and OC′ of modified nucleosides. 2′-O-MOE substituents with trans conformation around the C—C bond of the ethylene glycol linker are associated with close contacts between OC′ and N2 of a guanosine from the opposite strand, and, water-mediated, between OC′ and N3(G). When combined with the available thermodynamic data for duplexes containing 2′-O-MOE modified strands, this crystal structure allows for further detailed structure-stability analysis of other modifications.

[0226] In extending the crystallographic structure studies, molecular modeling experiments were performed to study further enhanced binding affinity of oligonucleotides having 2′-O-modifications. The computer simulations were conducted on compounds of SEQ ID NO: 7, above, having 2′-O-modifications located at each of the nucleosides of the oligonucleotide. The simulations were performed with the oligonucleotide in aqueous solution using the AMBER force field method (Cornell et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 5179-5197)(modeling software package from UCSF, San Francisco, Calif.). The calculations were performed on an Indigo2 SGI machine (Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, Calif.).

[0227] Further 2′-O-modifications that will have a 3′-endo sugar influence include those having a ring structure that incorporates a two atom portion corresponding to the A′ and B′ atoms of Structure II. The ring structure is attached at the 2′position of a sugar moiety of one or more nucleosides that are incorporated into an oligonucleotide. The 2′-oxygen of the nucleoside links to a carbon atom corresponding to the A′ atom of Structure II. These ring structures can be aliphatic, unsaturated aliphatic, aromatic or heterocyclic. A further atom of the ring (corresponding to the B′ atom of Structure II), bears a further oxygen atom, or a sulfur or nitrogen atom. This oxygen, sulfur or nitrogen atom is bonded to one or more hydrogen atoms, alkyl moieties, or haloalkyl moieties, or is part of a further chemical moiety such as a ureido, carbamate, amide or amidine moiety. The remainder of the ring structure restricts rotation about the bond joining these two ring atoms. This assists in positioning the “further oxygen, sulfur or nitrogen atom” (part of the R position as described above) such that the further atom can be located in close proximity to the 3′-oxygen atom (O3′) of the nucleoside.

[0228] Another preferred 2′-sugar substituent group that gives a 3′-endo sugar conformational geometry is the 2′-OMe group. 2′-Substitution of guanosine, cytidine, and uridine dinucleoside phosphates with the 2′-OMe group showed enhanced stacking effects with respect to the corresponding native (2′-OH) species leading to the conclusion that the sugar is adopting a C3′-endo conformation. In this case, it is believed that the hydrophobic attractive forces of the methyl group tend to overcome the destabilizing effects of its steric bulk.

[0229] The ability of oligonucleotides to bind to their complementary target strands is compared by determining the melting temperature (T_m) of the hybridization complex of the oligonucleotide and its complementary strand. The melting temperature (T_m), a characteristic physical property of double helices, denotes the temperature (in degrees centigrade) at which 50% helical (hybridized) versus coil (unhybridized) forms are present. T_m is measured by using the UV spectrum to determine the formation and breakdown (melting) of the hybridization complex. Base stacking, which occurs during hybridization, is accompanied by a reduction in UV absorption (hypochromicity). Consequently, a reduction in UV absorption indicates a higher T_m. The higher the T_m, the greater the strength of the bonds between the strands.

[0230] Freier and Altmann, Nucleic Acids Research, (1997) 25:4429-4443, have previously published a study on the influence of structural modifications of oligonucleotides on the stability of their duplexes with target RNA. In this study, the authors reviewed a series of oligonucleotides containing more than 200 different modifications that had been synthesized and assessed for their hybridization affinity and Tm. Sugar modifications studied included substitutions on the 2′-position of the sugar, 3′-substitution, replacement of the 4′-oxygen, the use of bicyclic sugars, and four member ring replacements. Several nucleobase modifications were also studied including substitutions at the 5, or 6 position of thymine, modifications of pyrimidine heterocycle and modifications of the purine heterocycle. Modified internucleoside linkages were also studied including neutral, phosphorus and non-phosphorus containing internucleoside linkages.

[0231] Increasing the percentage of C3′-endo sugars in a modified oligonucleotide targeted to an RNA target strand should preorganize this strand for binding to RNA. Of the several sugar modifications that have been reported and studied in the literature, the incorporation of electronegative substituents such as 2′-fluoro or 2′-alkoxy shift the sugar conformation towards the 3′ endo (northern) pucker conformation. This preorganizes an oligonucleotide that incorporates such modifications to have an A-form conformational geometry. This A-form conformation results in increased binding affinity of the oligonucleotide to a target RNA strand.

[0232] Molecular modeling experiments were performed to study further enhanced binding affinity of oligonucleotides having 2′-O-modifications. Computer simulations were conducted on compounds having SEQ ID NO: 54, r(CGC GAA UUC GCG), having 2′-O-modifications of the invention located at each of the nucleoside of the oligonucleotide. The simulations were performed with the oligonucleotide in aqueous solution using the AMBER force field method (Cornell et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 5179-5197)(modeling software package from UCSF, San Francisco, Calif.). The calculations were performed on an Indigo2 SGI machine (Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, Calif.).

[0233] In addition, for 2′-substituents containing an ethylene glycol motif, a gauche interaction between the oxygen atoms around the O—C—C—O torsion of the side chain may have a stabilizing effect on the duplex (Freier ibid.). Such gauche interactions have been observed experimentally for a number of years (Wolfe et al., Acc. Chem. Res., 1972, 5, 102; Abe et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98, 468). This gauche effect may result in a configuration of the side chain that is favorable for duplex formation. The exact nature of this stabilizing configuration has not yet been explained. While we do not want to be bound by theory, it may be that holding the O—C—C—O torsion in a single gauche configuration, rather than a more random distribution seen in an alkyl side chain, provides an entropic advantage for duplex formation.

[0234] Representative 2′-substituent groups amenable to the present invention that give A-form conformational properties (3′-endo) to the resultant duplexes include 2′-O-alkyl, 2′-O-substituted alkyl and 2′-fluoro substituent groups. Preferred for the substituent groups are various alkyl and aryl ethers and thioethers, amines and monoalkyl and dialkyl substituted amines. It is further intended that multiple modifications can be made to one or more of the compositions of the invention at multiple sites of one or more monomeric subunits (nucleosides are preferred) and or internucleoside linkages to enhance properties such as but not limited to activity in a selected application. Tables I through VII list nucleoside and internucleotide linkage modifications/replacements that have been shown to give a positive ATm per modification when the modification/replacement was made to a DNA strand that was hybridized to an RNA complement.

[0235]

TABLE I
Modified DNA strand having 2′-substituent groups that gave an
overall increase in Tm against an RNA complement:
	Positive ΔTm/mod
2′-substituents	2′-OH
	2′-O—C1–C4 alkyl
	2′-O—(CH2)2CH3
	2′-O—CH2CH═CH2
	2′-F
	2′-O—(CH2)2—O—CH3
	2′-[O—(CH2)2]2—O—CH3
	2′-[O—(CH2)2]3—O—CH3
	2′-[O—(CH2)2]4—O—CH3
	2′-[O—(CH2)2]3—O—(CH2)8CH3
	2′-O—(CH2)2CF3
	2′-O—(CH2)2OH
	2′-O—(CH2)2F
	2′-O—CH2CH(CH3)F
	2′-O—CH2CH(CH2OH)OH
	2′-O—CH2CH(CH2OCH3)OCH3
	2′-O—CH2CH(CH3)OCH3
	2′-O—CH2—C14H7O2(—C14H7O2 = Anthraquinone)
	2′-O—(CH2)3—NH2*
	2′-O—(CH2)4—NH2*
*These modifications can increase the Tm of oligonucleotides but can also decrease the Tm depending on positioning and number (motiff dependant).

[0236]

TABLE II
Modified DNA strand having modified sugar ring
(see structure x) that gave an overall increase
in Tm against an RNA complement:
		Positive Δ Tm/mod
	Q	—S—
		—CH2—
Note: In general ring oxygen substitution with sulfur or methylene had only a minor effect on Tm for the specific motiffs studied. Substitution at the 2′-position with groups shown to stabilize the duplex were destabilizing when CH2 replaced the ring O. This is thought to be due to the necessary gauche interaction between the ring O  with particular 2′-substituents (for example  —O—CH3 and —(O—CH2CH2)3—O—CH3.

[0237]

TABLE III
Modified DNA strand having modified sugar ring
that give an overall increase in Tm against an
RNA complement:
		Positive Δ Tm/mod
	—C(H)R1 effects	OH
	(R2, R3 both = H)	CH3*
		CH2OH*
		OCH3*
*These modifications can increase the Tm of oligonucleotides but can also decrease the Tm depending on positioning and number (motiff dependant).

[0238]

TABLE IV
Modified DNA strand having bicyclic substitute sugar
modifications that give an overall increase in Tm
against an RNA complement:
	Formula	Positive Δ Tm/mod
	I	+
	II	+

[0239]

TABLE V
Modified DNA strand having modified heterocyclic base
moieties that give an overall increase in Tm against
an RNA complement:
	Modification/Formula	Positive Δ Tm/mod
	Heterocyclic base	2-thioT
	modifications	2′-O-methylpseudoU
		7-halo-7-deaza purines
		7-propyne-7-deaza purines
		2-aminoA(2,6-diaminopurine)
	Modification/Formula	Positive Δ Tm/mod
	(R2, R3 = H), R1 =	Br
		C≡C—CH3
		(CH2)3NH2
		CH3
Motiffs-disubstitution
R1 = C≡C—CH3, R2 = H, R3 =	F
R1 = C≡C—CH3, R2 = H	R3 = O—(CH2)2—O—CH3
R1 = O—CH3, R2 = H,	R3 = O—(CH2)—O—CH3*
*This modification can increase the Tm of oligonucleotides but can also decrease the Tm depending on positioning and number (motiff dependant).

[0240] Substitution at R₁ can be stabilizing, substitution at R₂ is generally greatly destabilizing (unable to form anti conformation), motiffs with stabilizing 5 and 2′-substituent groups are generally additive e.g. increase stability.

[0241] Substitution of the O4 and O2 positions of 2′-O-methyl uridine was greatly duplex destabilizing as these modifications remove hydrogen binding sites that would be an expected result. 6-Aza T also showed extreme destabilization as this substitution reduces the pK_a and shifts the nucleoside toward the enol tautomer resulting in reduced hydrogen bonding.

[0242]

TABLE VI
DNA strand having at least one modified phosphorus containing
internucleoside linkage and the effect on the Tm against an RNA
complement:
	ΔTm/mod+	ΔTm/mod−
	phosphoramidate (the 3′-bridging	phosphorothioate1
	atom replaced with an N(H)R	phosphoramidate1
	group, stabilization effect	methyl phosphonates1
	enhanced when also have 2′-F)
	(1one of the non-bridging oxygen atoms replaced with S, N(H)R or —CH3)

[0243]

TABLE VII
DNA strand having at least one non-phosphorus containing
internucleoside linkage and the effect on the Tm
against an RNA complement:
	Positive ΔTm/mod
	—CH2C(═O)NHCH2—*
	—CH2C(═O)N(CH3)CH2—*
	—CH2C(═O)N(CH2CH2CH3)CH2—*
	—CH2C(═O)N(H)CH2 —(motiff with 5′-propyne on T's)
	—CH2N(H)C(═O)CH2—*
	—CH2N(CH3)OCH2—*
	—CH2N(CH3)N(CH3)CH2—*
	*This modification can increase the Tm of oligonucleotides but can also decrease the Tm depending on positioning and number (motiff dependant).
	Notes:
	In general carbon chain internucleotide linkages were destabilizing to duplex formation. This destabilization was not as severe when double and tripple bonds were utilized.
	The use of glycol and flexible ether linkages were also destabilizing.

[0244] Preferred ring structures of the invention for inclusion as a 2′-O modification include cyclohexyl, cyclopentyl and phenyl rings as well as heterocyclic rings having spacial footprints similar to cyclohexyl, cyclopentyl and phenyl rings. Particularly preferred 2′-O-substituent groups of the invention are listed below including an abbreviation for each:

• • [0245] 2′-O-(trans 2-methoxy cyclohexyl)-2′-O-(TMCHL)
  • [0246] 2′-O-(trans 2-methoxy cyclopentyl)-2′-O-(TMCPL)
  • [0247] 2′-O-(trans 2-ureido cyclohexyl)-2′-O-(TUCHL)
  • [0248] 2′-O-(trans 2-methoxyphenyl)-2′-O-(2MP)

[0249] Structural details for duplexes incorporating such 2-O-substituents were analyzed using the described AMBER force field program on the Indigo2 SGI machine. The simulated structure maintained a stable A-form geometry throughout the duration of the simulation. The presence of the 2′ substitutions locked the sugars in the C3′-endo conformation.

[0250] The simulation for the TMCHL modification revealed that the 2′-O-(TMCHL) side chains have a direct interaction with water molecules solvating the duplex. The oxygen atoms in the 2′-O-(TMCHL) side chain are capable of forming a water-mediated interaction with the 3′ oxygen of the phosphate backbone. The presence of the two oxygen atoms in the 2′-O-(TMCHL) side chain gives rise to favorable gauche interactions. The barrier for rotation around the O—C—C—O torsion is made even larger by this novel modification. The preferential preorganization in an A-type geometry increases the binding affinity of the 2′-O-(TMCHL) to the target RNA. The locked side chain conformation in the 2′-O-(TMCHL) group created a more favorable pocket for binding water molecules. The presence of these water molecules played a key role in holding the side chains in the preferable gauche conformation. While not wishing to be bound by theory, the bulk of the substituent, the diequatorial orientation of the substituents in the cyclohexane ring, the water of hydration and the potential for trapping of metal ions in the conformation generated will additionally contribute to improved binding affinity and nuclease resistance of oligonucleotides incorporating nucleosides having this 2′-O-modification.

[0251] As described for the TMCHL modification above, identical computer simulations of the 2′-O-(TMCPL), the 2′-O-(2MP) and 2′-O-(TUCHL) modified oligonucleotides in aqueous solution also illustrate that stable A-form geometry will be maintained throughout the duration of the simulation. The presence of the 2′ substitution will lock the sugars in the C3′-endo conformation and the side chains will have direct interaction with water molecules solvating the duplex. The oxygen atoms in the respective side chains are capable of forming a water-mediated interaction with the 3′ oxygen of the phosphate backbone. The presence of the two oxygen atoms in the respective side chains give rise to the favorable gauche interactions. The barrier for rotation around the respective O—C—C—O torsions will be made even larger by respective modification. The preferential preorganization in A-type geometry will increase the binding affinity of the respective 2′-O-modified oligonucleotides to the target RNA. The locked side chain conformation in the respective modifications will create a more favorable pocket for binding water molecules. The presence of these water molecules plays a key role in holding the side chains in the preferable gauche conformation. The bulk of the substituent, the diequatorial orientation of the substituents in their respective rings, the water of hydration and the potential trapping of metal ions in the conformation generated will all contribute to improved binding affinity and nuclease resistance of oligonucleotides incorporating nucleosides having these respective 2′-O-modification.

[0252] Ribose conformations in C2′-modified nucleosides containing S-methyl groups were examined. To understand the influence of 2′-O-methyl and 2′-S-methyl groups on the conformation of nucleosides, we evaluated the relative energies of the 2′-O- and 2′-S-methylguanosine, along with normal deoxyguanosine and riboguanosine, starting from both C2′-endo and C3′-endo conformations using ab initio quantum mechanical calculations. All the structures were fully optimized at HF/6-31G* level and single point energies with electron-correlation were obtained at the MP2/6-31G*//HF/6-31G* level. As shown in Table 1, the C2′-endo conformation of deoxyguanosine is estimated to be 0.6 kcal/mol more stable than the C3′-endo conformation in the gas-phase. The conformational preference of the C2′-endo over the C3′-endo conformation appears to be less dependent upon electron correlation as revealed by the MP2/6-31G*//HF/6-31G* values which also predict the same difference in energy. The opposite trend is noted for riboguanosine. At the HF/6-31G* and MP2/6-31G*//HF/6-31G* levels, the C3′-endo form of riboguanosine is shown to be about 0.65 and 1.41 kcal/mol more stable than the C2′endo form, respectively.

[0253]

TABLE 1
Relative energies* of the C3′-endo and C2′-endo conformations
of representative nucleosides.
			CONTINUUM
	HF/6-31G	MP2/6-31-G	MODEL	AMBER
dG	0.60	0.56	0.88	0.65
rG	−0.65	−1.41	−0.28	−2.09
2′-O—MeG	−0.89	−1.79	−0.36	−0.86
2′-S—MeG	2.55	1.41	3.16	2.43
*energies are in kcal/mol relative to the C2′-endo conformation

[0254] Table 1 also includes the relative energies of 2′-O-methylguanosine and 2′-S-methylguanosine in C2′-endo and C3′-endo conformation. This data indicates the electronic nature of C2′-substitution has a significant impact on the relative stability of these conformations. Substitution of the 2′-O-methyl group increases the preference for the C3′-endo conformation (when compared to riboguanosine) by about 0.4 kcal/mol at both the HF/6-31G* and MP2/6-31G*//HF/6-31G* levels. In contrast, the 2′-S-methyl group reverses the trend. The C2′-endo conformation is favored by about 2.6 kcal/mol at the HF/6-31G* level, while the same difference is reduced to 1.41 kcal/mol at the MP2/6-31G*//HF/6-31G* level. For comparison, and also to evaluate the accuracy of the molecular mechanical force-field parameters used for the 2′-O-methyl and 2′-S-methyl substituted nucleosides, we have calculated the gas phase energies of the nucleosides. The results reported in Table 1 indicate that the calculated relative energies of these nucleosides compare qualitatively well with the ab initio calculations.

[0255] Additional calculations were also performed to gauge the effect of solvation on the relative stability of nucleoside conformations. The estimated solvation effect using HF/6-31G* geometries confirms that the relative energetic preference of the four nucleosides in the gas-phase is maintained in the aqueous phase as well (Table 1). Solvation effects were also examined using molecular dynamics simulations of the nucleosides in explicit water. From these trajectories, one can observe the predominance of C2′-endo conformation for deoxyriboguanosine and 2′-S-methylriboguanosine while riboguanosine and 2′-O-methylriboguanosine prefer the C3′-endo conformation. These results are in much accord with the available NMR results on 2′-S-methylribonucleosides. NMR studies of sugar puckering equilibrium using vicinal spin-coupling constants have indicated that the conformation of the sugar ring in 2′-S-methylpyrimidine nucleosides show an average of >75% S-character, whereas the corresponding purine analogs exhibit an average of >90% S-pucker [Fraser, A., Wheeler, P., Cook, P. D. and Sanghvi, Y. S., J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1993, 30, 1277-1287]. It was observed that the 2′-S-methyl substitution in deoxynucleoside confers more conformational rigidity to the sugar conformation when compared with deoxyribonucleosides.

[0256] Structural features of DNA:RNA, OMe-DNA:RNA and SMe-DNA:RNA hybrids were also observed. The average RMS deviation of the DNA:RNA structure from the starting hybrid coordinates indicate the structure is stabilized over the length of the simulation with an approximate average RMS deviation of 1.0 Å. This deviation is due, in part, to inherent differences in averaged structures (i.e. the starting conformation) and structures at thermal equilibrium. The changes in sugar pucker conformation for three of the central base pairs of this hybrid are in good agreement with the observations made in previous NMR studies. The sugars in the RNA strand maintain very stable geometries in the C3′-endo conformation with ring pucker values near 0°. In contrast, the sugars of the DNA strand show significant variability.

[0257] The average RMS deviation of the OMe-DNA:RNA is approximately 1.2 Å from the starting A-form conformation; while the SMe-DNA:RNA shows a slightly higher deviation (approximately 1.8 Å) from the starting hybrid conformation. The SMe-DNA strand also shows a greater variance in RMS deviation, suggesting the S-methyl group may induce some structural fluctuations. The sugar puckers of the RNA complements maintain C3′-endo puckering throughout the simulation. As expected from the nucleoside calculations, however, significant differences are noted in the puckering of the OMe-DNA and SMe-DNA strands, with the former adopting C3′-endo, and the latter, C1′-exo/C2′-endo conformations.

[0258] An analysis of the helicoidal parameters for all three hybrid structures has also been performed to further characterize the duplex conformation. Three of the more important axis-basepair parameters that distinguish the different forms of the duplexes, X-displacement, propeller twist, and inclination, are reported in Table 2. Usually, an X-displacement near zero represents a B-form duplex; while a negative displacement, which is a direct measure of deviation of the helix from the helical axis, makes the structure appear more A-like in conformation. In A-form duplexes, these values typically vary from −4 Å to −5 Å. In comparing these values for all three hybrids, the SMe_DNA:RNA hybrid shows the most deviation from the A-form value, the OMe_DNA:RNA shows the least, and the DNA:RNA is intermediate. A similar trend is also evident when comparing the inclination and propeller twist values with ideal A-form parameters. These results are further supported by an analysis of the backbone and glycosidic torsion angles of the hybrid structures. Glycosidic angles (X) of A-form geometries, for example, are typically near −159° while B form values are near −102°. These angles are found to be −162°, −133°, and −108° for the OMe-DNA, DNA, and SMe-DNA strands, respectively. All RNA complements adopt an X angle close to −160°. In addition, “crankshaft” transitions were also noted in the backbone torsions of the central UpU steps of the RNA strand in the SMe-DNA:RNA and DNA;RNA hybrids. Such transitions suggest some local conformational changes may occur to relieve a less favorable global conformation. Taken overall, the results indicate the amount of A-character decreases as OMe-DNA:RNA>DNA:RNA>SMe-DNA:RNA, with the latter two adopting more intermediate conformations when compared to A- and B-form geometries.

[0259]

TABLE 2
Average helical parameters derived from
the last 500 ps of simulation time.
(canonical A-and B-form values are given for comparison)
Helicoidal	B-DNA	B-DNA	A-DNA
Parameter	(x-ray)	(fibre)	(fibre)	DNA:RNA	OMe_DNA:RNA	SMe_DNA:RNA
X-disp	1.2	0.0	−5.3	−4.5	−5.4	−3.5
Inclination	−2.3	1.5	20.7	11.6	15.1	0.7
Propeller	−16.4	−13.3	−7.5	−12.7	−15.8	−10.3

[0260] Stability of C2′-modified DNA:RNA hybrids was determined. Although the overall stability of the DNA:RNA hybrids depends on several factors including sequence-dependencies and the purine content in the DNA or RNA strands DNA:RNA hybrids are usually less stable than RNA:RNA duplexes and, in some cases, even less stable than DNA:DNA duplexes. Available experimental data attributes the relatively lowered stability of DNA:RNA hybrids largely to its intermediate conformational nature between DNA:DNA (B-family) and RNA:RNA (A-family) duplexes. The overall thermodynamic stability of nucleic acid duplexes may originate from several factors including the conformation of backbone, base-pairing and stacking interactions. While it is difficult to ascertain the individual thermodynamic contributions to the overall stabilization of the duplex, it is reasonable to argue that the major factors that promote increased stability of hybrid duplexes are better stacking interactions (electrostatic π-π interactions) and more favorable groove dimensions for hydration. The C2′-S-methyl substitution has been shown to destabilize the hybrid duplex. The notable differences in the rise values among the three hybrids may offer some explanation. While the 2′-S-methyl group has a strong influence on decreasing the base-stacking through high rise values (˜3.2 Å), the 2′-O-methyl group makes the overall structure more compact with a rise value that is equal to that of A-form duplexes (˜2.6 Å). Despite its overall A-like structural features, the SMe_DNA:RNA hybrid structure possesses an average rise value of 3.2 Å which is quite close to that of B-family duplexes. In fact, some local base-steps (CG steps) may be observed to have unusually high rise values (as high as 4.5 Å). Thus, the greater destabilization of 2′-S-methyl substituted DNA:RNA hybrids may be partly attributed to poor stacking interactions.

[0261] It has been postulated that RNase H binds to the minor groove of RNA:DNA hybrid complexes, requiring an intermediate minor groove width between ideal A- and B-form geometries to optimize interactions between the sugar phosphate backbone atoms and RNase H. A close inspection of the averaged structures for the hybrid duplexes using computer simulations reveals significant variation in the minor groove width dimensions as shown in Table 3. Whereas the O-methyl substitution leads to a slight expansion of the minor groove width when compared to the standard DNA:RNA complex, the S-methyl substitution leads to a general contraction (approximately 0.9 Å). These changes are most likely due to the preferred sugar puckering noted for the antisense strands which induce either A- or B-like single strand conformations. In addition to minor groove variations, the results also point to potential differences in the steric makeup of the minor groove. The O-methyl group points into the minor groove while the S-methyl is directed away towards the major groove. Essentially, the S-methyl group has flipped through the bases into the major groove as a consequence of C2′-endo puckering.

[0262]

TABLE 3
Minor groove widths averaged
over the last 500 ps of simulation time
		OMe—	SMe—
Phosphate	DNA:	DNA:	DNA:	DNA:RNA	RNA:RNA
Distance	RNA	RNA	RNA	(B-form)	(A-form)
P5-P20	15.27	16.82	13.73	14.19	17.32
P6-P19	15.52	16.79	15.73	12.66	17.12
P7-P18	15.19	16.40	14.08	11.10	16.60
P8-P17	15.07	16.12	14.00	10.98	16.14
P9-P16	15.29	16.25	14.98	11.65	16.93
P10-P15	15.37	16.57	13.92	14.05	17.69

Chemistries Defined

[0263] Unless otherwise defined herein, alkyl means C₁-C₁₂, preferably C₁-C₈, and more preferably C₁-C₆, straight or (where possible) branched chain aliphatic hydrocarbyl.

[0264] Unless otherwise defined herein, heteroalkyl means C₁-C₁₂, preferably C₁-C₈, and more preferably C₁-C₆, straight or (where possible) branched chain aliphatic hydrocarbyl containing at least one, and preferably about 1 to about 3, hetero atoms in the chain, including the terminal portion of the chain. Preferred heteroatoms include N, O and S.

[0265] Unless otherwise defined herein, cycloalkyl means C₃-C₁₂, preferably C₃-C₈, and more preferably C₃-C₆, aliphatic hydrocarbyl ring.

[0266] Unless otherwise defined herein, alkenyl means C₂-C₁₂, preferably C₂-C₈, and more preferably C₂-C₆ alkenyl, which may be straight or (where possible) branched hydrocarbyl moiety, which contains at least one carbon-carbon double bond.

[0267] Unless otherwise defined herein, alkynyl means C₂-C₁₂, preferably C₂-C₈, and more preferably C₂-C₆ alkynyl, which may be straight or (where possible) branched hydrocarbyl moiety, which contains at least one carbon-carbon triple bond.

[0268] Unless otherwise defined herein, heterocycloalkyl means a ring moiety containing at least three ring members, at least one of which is carbon, and of which 1, 2 or three ring members are other than carbon. Preferably the number of carbon atoms varies from 1 to about 12, preferably 1 to about 6, and the total number of ring members varies from three to about 15, preferably from about 3 to about 8. Preferred ring heteroatoms are N, O and S. Preferred heterocycloalkyl groups include morpholino, thiomorpholino, piperidinyl, piperazinyl, homopiperidinyl, homopiperazinyl, homomorpholino, homothiomorpholino, pyrrolodinyl, tetrahydrooxazolyl, tetrahydroimidazolyl, tetrahydrothiazolyl, tetrahydroisoxazolyl, tetrahydropyrrazolyl, furanyl, pyranyl, and tetrahydroisothiazolyl.

[0269] Unless otherwise defined herein, aryl means any hydrocarbon ring structure containing at least one aryl ring. Preferred aryl rings have about 6 to about 20 ring carbons. Especially preferred aryl rings include phenyl, napthyl, anthracenyl, and phenanthrenyl.

[0270] Unless otherwise defined herein, hetaryl means a ring moiety containing at least one fully unsaturated ring, the ring consisting of carbon and non-carbon atoms. Preferably the ring system contains about 1 to about 4 rings. Preferably the number of carbon atoms varies from 1 to about 12, preferably 1 to about 6, and the total number of ring members varies from three to about 15, preferably from about 3 to about 8. Preferred ring heteroatoms are N, O and S. Preferred hetaryl moieties include pyrazolyl, thiophenyl, pyridyl, imidazolyl, tetrazolyl, pyridyl, pyrimidinyl, purinyl, quinazolinyl, quinoxalinyl, benzimidazolyl, benzothiophenyl, etc.

[0271] Unless otherwise defined herein, where a moiety is defined as a compound moiety, such as hetarylalkyl (hetaryl and alkyl), aralkyl (aryl and alkyl), etc., each of the sub-moieties is as defined herein.

[0272] Unless otherwise defined herein, an electron withdrawing group is a group, such as the cyano or isocyanato group that draws electronic charge away from the carbon to which it is attached. Other electron withdrawing groups of note include those whose electronegativities exceed that of carbon, for example halogen, nitro, or phenyl substituted in the ortho- or para-position with one or more cyano, isothiocyanato, nitro or halo groups.

[0273] Unless otherwise defined herein, the terms halogen and halo have their ordinary meanings. Preferred halo (halogen) substituents are Cl, Br, and I.

[0274] The aforementioned optional substituents are, unless otherwise herein defined, suitable substituents depending upon desired properties. Included are halogens (Cl, Br, I), alkyl, alkenyl, and alkynyl moieties, NO₂, NH₃ (substituted and unsubstituted), acid moieties (e.g. —CO₂H, —OSO₃H₂, etc.), heterocycloalkyl moieties, hetaryl moieties, aryl moieties, etc.

[0275] In all the preceding formulae, the squiggle (˜) indicates a bond to an oxygen or sulfur of the 5′-phosphate. Phosphate protecting groups include those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,760,209, 5,614,621, 6,051,699, 6,020,475, 6,326,478, 6,169,177, 6,121,437, 6,465,628 each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Oligomer Synthesis

[0276] Oligomerization of modified and unmodified nucleosides is performed according to literature procedures for DNA (Protocols for Oligonucleotides and Analogs, Ed. Agrawal (1993), Humana Press) and/or RNA (Scaringe, Methods (2001), 23, 206-217. Gait et al., Applications of Chemically synthesized RNA in RNA:Protein Interactions, Ed. Smith (1998), 1-36. Gallo et al., Tetrahedron (2001), 57, 5707-5713) synthesis as appropriate. In addition specific protocols for the synthesis of compositions of the invention are illustrated in the examples below.

[0277] The oligonucleotides used in accordance with this invention may be conveniently and routinely made through the well-known technique of solid phase synthesis. Equipment for such synthesis is sold by several vendors including, for example, Applied Biosystems (Foster City, Calif.). Any other means for such synthesis known in the art may additionally or alternatively be employed. It is well known to use similar techniques to prepare oligonucleotides such as the phosphorothioates and alkylated derivatives.

[0278] The present invention is also useful for the preparation of oligonucleotides incorporating at least one 2′-O-protected nucleoside. After incorporation and appropriate deprotection the 2′-O-protected nucleoside will be converted to a ribonucleoside at the position of incorporation. The number and position of the 2-ribonucleoside units in the final oligonucleotide can vary from one at any site or the strategy can be used to prepare up to a full 2′-OH modified oligonucleotide. All 2′-O-protecting groups amenable to the synthesis of oligonucleotides are included in the present invention. In general a protected nucleoside is attached to a solid support by for example a succinate linker. Then the oligonucleotide is elongated by repeated cycles of deprotecting the 5′-terminal hydroxyl group, coupling of a further nucleoside unit, capping and oxidation (alternatively sulfurization). In a more frequently used method of synthesis the completed oligonucleotide is cleaved from the solid support with the removal of phosphate protecting groups and exocyclic amino protecting groups by treatment with an ammonia solution. Then a further deprotection step is normally required for removal of the more specialized protecting groups used for the protection of 2′-hydroxyl groups thereby affording the fully deprotected oligonucleotide.

[0279] A large number of 2′-O-protecting groups have been used for the synthesis of oligoribonucleotides but over the years more effective groups have been discovered. The key to an effective 2′-O-protecting group is that it is capable of selectively being introduced at the 2′-O-position and that it can be removed easily after synthesis without the formation of unwanted side products. The protecting group also needs to be inert to the normal deprotecting, coupling, and capping steps required for oligoribonucleotide synthesis. Some of the protecting groups used initially for oligoribonucleotide synthesis included tetrahydropyran-1-yl and 4-methoxytetrahydropyran-4-yl. These two groups are not compatible with all 5′-O-protecting groups so modified versions were used with 5′-DMT groups such as 1-(2-fluorophenyl)4-methoxypiperidin-4-yl (Fpmp). Reese has identified a number of piperidine derivatives (like Fpmp) that are useful in the synthesis of oligoribonucleotides including 1-[(chloro4-methyl)phenyl]-4′-methoxypiperidin-4-yl (Reese et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, (27), 2291). Another approach was to replace the standard 5′-DMT (dimethoxytrityl) group with protecting groups that were removed under non-acidic conditions such as levulinyl and 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl. Such groups enable the use of acid labile 2′-protecting groups for oligoribonucleotide synthesis. Another more widely used protecting group initially used for the synthesis of oligoribonucleotides was the t-butyldimethylsilyl group (Ogilvie et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1974, 2861; Hakimelahi et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, (22), 2543; and Jones et al., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin I., 2762). The 2′-O-protecting groups can require special reagents for their removal such as for example the t-butyldimethylsilyl group is normally removed after all other cleaving/deprotecting steps by treatment of the oligonucleotide with tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF).

[0280] One group of researchers examined a number of 2′-O-protecting groups (Pitsch, S., Chimia, 2001, (55), 320-324.) The group examined fluoride labile and photolabile protecting groups that are removed using moderate conditions. One photolabile group that was examined was the [2-(nitrobenzyl)oxy]methyl (nbm) protecting group (Schwartz et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1992, (2), 1019.) Other groups examined included a number structurally related formaldehyde acetal-derived, 2′-O-protecting groups. Also prepared were a number of related protecting groups for preparing 2′-O-alkylated nucleoside phosphoramidites including 2′-O-[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl (2′-O—CH₂—O—Si(iPr)₃, TOM). One 2′-O-protecting group that was prepared to be used orthogonally to the TOM group was 2′-O—[(R)-1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethyloxy)methyl] ((R)-mnbm).

[0281] Another strategy using a fluoride labile 5′-O-protecting group (non-acid labile) and an acid labile 2′-O-protecting group has been reported (Scaringe, Stephen A., Methods, 2001, (23) 206-217). A number of possible silyl ethers were examined for 5′-O-protection and a number of acetals and orthoesters were examined for 2′-O-protection. The protection scheme that gave the best results was 5′-O-silyl ether-2′-ACE (5′-O-bis(trimethylsiloxy)cyclododecyloxysilyl ether (DOD)-2′-O-bis(2-acetoxyethoxy)methyl (ACE). This approach uses a modified phosphoramidite synthesis approach in that some different reagents are required that are not routinely used for RNA/DNA synthesis.

[0282] Although a lot of research has focused on the synthesis of oligoribonucleotides the main RNA synthesis strategies that are presently being used commercially include 5′-O-DMT-2′-O-t-butyldimethylsilyl (TBDMS), 5′-O-DMT-2′-O-[1(2-fluorophenyl)-4-methoxypiperidin-4-yl] (FPMP), 2′-O-[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl (2′-O—CH₂—O—Si(iPr)₃ (TOM), and the 5′-O-silyl ether-2′-ACE (5′-O-bis(trimethylsiloxy)cyclododecyloxysilyl ether (DOD)-2′-O-bis(2-acetoxyethoxy)methyl (ACE). A current list of some of the major companies currently offering RNA products include Pierce Nucleic Acid Technologies, Dharmacon Research Inc., Ameri Biotechnologies Inc., and Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. One company, Princeton Separations, is marketing an RNA synthesis activator advertised to reduce coupling times especially with TOM and TBDMS chemistries. Such an activator would also be amenable to the present invention.

[0283] The primary groups being used for commercial RNA synthesis are:

• • [0284] TBDMS=5′-O-DMT-2′-O-t-butyldimethylsilyl;
  • [0285] TOM=2′-O-[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl;
  • [0286] DOD/ACE=(5′-O-bis(trimethylsiloxy)cyclododecyloxysilyl ether-2′-O-bis(2-acetoxyethoxy)methyl
  • [0287] FPMP=5 ′-O-DMT-2′-O-[1(2-fluorophenyl)-4-methoxypiperidin-4-yl].

[0288] All of the aforementioned RNA synthesis strategies are amenable to the present invention. Strategies that would be a hybrid of the above e.g. using a 5′-protecting group from one strategy with a 2′-O-protecting from another strategy is also amenable to the present invention.

[0289] The preparation of ribonucleotides and oligonucleotides having at least one ribonucleoside incorporated and all the possible configurations falling in between these two extremes are encompassed by the present invention. The corresponding oligomeric comounds can be hybridized to further oligonucleotides including oligoribonucleotides having regions of complementarity to form double-stranded (duplexed) oligonucleotides. Such double stranded oligonucleotide moieties have been shown in the art to modulate target expression and regulate translation as well as RNA processsing via an antisense mechanism. Moreover, the double-stranded moieties may be subject to chemical modifications (Fire et al., Nature, 1998, 391, 806-811; Timmons and Fire, Nature 1998, 395, 854; Timmons et al., Gene, 2001, 263, 103-112; Tabara et al., Science, 1998, 282, 430-431; Montgomery et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95, 15502-15507; Tuschl et al., Genes Dev., 1999, 13, 3191-3197; Elbashir et al., Nature, 2001, 411, 494-498; Elbashir et al., Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 188-200). For example, such double-stranded moieties have been shown to inhibit the target by the classical hybridization of antisense strand of the duplex to the target, thereby triggering enzymatic degradation of the target (Tijsterman et al., Science, 2002, 295, 694-697).

[0290] The methods of preparing oligonucleotides of the present invention can also be applied in the areas of drug discovery and target validation. The present invention comprehends the use of the oligonucleotides and preferred targets identified herein in drug discovery efforts to elucidate relationships that exist between proteins and a disease state, phenotype, or condition. These methods include detecting or modulating a target peptide comprising contacting a sample, tissue, cell, or organism with the oligonucleotides of the present invention, measuring the nucleic acid or protein level of the target and/or a related phenotypic or chemical endpoint at some time after treatment, and optionally comparing the measured value to a non-treated sample or sample treated with a further oligonucleotide of the invention. These methods can also be performed in parallel or in combination with other experiments to determine the function of unknown genes for the process of target validation or to determine the validity of a particular gene product as a target for treatment or prevention of a particular disease, condition, or phenotype.

[0291] Effect of nucleoside modifications on RNAi activity is evaluated according to existing literature (Elbashir et al., Nature (2001), 411, 494-498; Nishikura et al., Cell (2001), 107, 415-416; and Bass et al., Cell (2000), 101, 235-238.)

Targets of the Invention

[0292] “Targeting” a composition of the present invention to a particular nucleic acid molecule, in the context of this invention, can be a multistep process. The process usually begins with the identification of a target nucleic acid whose function is to be modulated. This target nucleic acid may be, for example, a cellular gene (or mRNA transcribed from the gene) whose expression is associated with a particular disorder or disease state, or a nucleic acid molecule from an infectious agent.

[0293] The targeting process usually also includes determination of at least one target region, segment, or site within the target nucleic acid for the antisense interaction to occur such that the desired effect, e.g., modulation of expression, will result. Within the context of the present invention, the term “region” as applied to targets is defined as a portion of the target nucleic acid having at least one identifiable structure, function, or characteristic. Within regions of target nucleic acids are segments. “Segments” are defined as smaller or sub-portions of regions within a target nucleic acid. “Sites,” as used in the present invention, are defined as positions within a target nucleic acid. The terms region, segment, and site can also be used to describe an oligomeric compound such as an oligonucleotide of the invention such as for example a gapped oligonucleotide having 3 separate segments.

[0294] Since, as is known in the art, the translation initiation codon is typically 5′-AUG (in transcribed mRNA molecules; 5′-ATG in the corresponding DNA molecule), the translation initiation codon is also referred to as the “AUG codon,” the “start codon” or the “AUG start codon”. A minority of genes have a translation initiation codon having the RNA sequence 5′-GUG, 5′-UUG or 5′-CUG, and 5′-AUA, 5′-ACG and 5′-CUG have been shown to function in vivo. Thus, the terms “translation initiation codon” and “start codon” can encompass many codon sequences, even though the initiator amino acid in each instance is typically methionine (in eukaryotes) or formylmethionine (in prokaryotes). It is also known in the art that eukaryotic and prokaryotic genes may have two or more alternative start codons, any one of which may be preferentially utilized for translation initiation in a particular cell type or tissue, or under a particular set of conditions. In the context of the invention, “start codon” and “translation initiation codon” refer to the codon or codons that are used in vivo to initiate translation of an mRNA transcribed from a gene encoding a nucleic acid target, regardless of the sequence(s) of such codons. It is also known in the art that a translation termination codon (or “stop codon”) of a gene may have one of three sequences, i.e., 5′-UAA, 5′-UAG and 5′-UGA (the corresponding DNA sequences are 5′-TAA, 5′-TAG and 5′-TGA, respectively).

[0295] The terms “start codon region” and “translation initiation codon region” refer to a portion of such an MRNA or gene that encompasses from about 25 to about 50 contiguous nucleotides in either direction (i.e., 5′ or 3′) from a translation initiation codon. Similarly, the terms “stop codon region” and “translation termination codon region” refer to a portion of such an mRNA or gene that encompasses from about 25 to about 50 contiguous nucleotides in either direction (i.e., 5′ or 3′) from a translation termination codon. Consequently, the “start codon region” (or “translation initiation codon region”) and the “stop codon region” (or “translation termination codon region”) are all regions which may be targeted effectively with the compositions of the present invention.

[0296] The open reading frame (ORF) or “coding region,” which is known in the art to refer to the region between the translation initiation codon and the translation termination codon, is also a region which may be targeted effectively. Within the context of the present invention, a preferred region is the intragenic region encompassing the translation initiation or termination codon of the open reading frame (ORF) of a gene.

[0297] Other target regions include the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR), known in the art to refer to the portion of an MRNA in the 5′ direction from the translation initiation codon, and thus including nucleotides between the 5′ cap site and the translation initiation codon of an mRNA (or corresponding nucleotides on the gene), and the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR), known in the art to refer to the portion of an mRNA in the 3′ direction from the translation termination codon, and thus including nucleotides between the translation termination codon and 3′ end of an mRNA (or corresponding nucleotides on the gene). The 5′ cap site of an mRNA comprises an N7-methylated guanosine residue joined to the 5′-most residue of the mRNA via a 5′-5′ triphosphate linkage. The 5′ cap region of an mRNA is considered to include the 5′ cap structure itself as well as the first 50 nucleotides adjacent to the cap site. It is also preferred to target the 5′ cap region.

[0298] Although some eukaryotic mRNA transcripts are directly translated, many contain one or more regions, known as “introns,” which are excised from a transcript before it is translated. The remaining (and therefore translated) regions are known as “exons” and are spliced together to form a continuous mRNA sequence. Targeting splice sites, i.e., intron-exon junctions or exon-intron junctions, may also be particularly useful in situations where aberrant splicing is implicated in disease, or where an overproduction of a particular splice product is implicated in disease. Aberrant fusion junctions due to rearrangements or deletions are also preferred target sites. MRNA transcripts produced via the process of splicing of two (or more) mRNAs from different gene sources are known as “fusion transcripts”. It is also known that introns can be effectively targeted using antisense oligonucleotides targeted to, for example, DNA or pre-mRNA.

[0299] It is also known in the art that alternative RNA transcripts can be produced from the same genomic region of DNA. These alternative transcripts are generally known as “variants”. More specifically, “pre-mRNA variants” are transcripts produced from the same genomic DNA that differ from other transcripts produced from the same genomic DNA in either their start or stop position and contain both intronic and exonic sequences.

[0300] Upon excision of one or more exon or intron regions, or portions thereof during splicing, pre-mRNA variants produce smaller “mRNA variants”. Consequently, mRNA variants are processed pre-mRNA variants and each unique pre-mRNA variant must always produce a unique MRNA variant as a result of splicing. These mRNA variants are also known as “alternative splice variants”. If no splicing of the pre-mRNA variant occurs then the pre-mRNA variant is identical to the MRNA variant.

[0301] It is also known in the art that variants can be produced through the use of alternative signals to start or stop transcription and that pre-niRNAs and mRNAs can possess more that one start codon or stop codon. Variants that originate from a pre-mRNA or MRNA that use alternative start codons are known as “alternative start variants” of that pre-mRNA or mRNA. Those transcripts that use an alternative stop codon are known as “alternative stop variants” of that pre-mRNA or mRNA. One specific type of alternative stop variant is the “polyA variant” in which the multiple transcripts produced result from the alternative selection of one of the “polyA stop signals” by the transcription machinery, thereby producing transcripts that terminate at unique polyA sites. Within the context of the invention, the types of variants described herein are also preferred target nucleic acids.

[0302] The locations on the target nucleic acid to which the preferred compositions of the present invention hybridize are hereinbelow referred to as “preferred target segments.” As used herein the term “preferred target segment” is defined as at least an 8-nucleobase portion of a target region that is targeted by the compositions of the invention. While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is presently believed that these target segments represent accessible portions of the target nucleic acid for hybridization.

[0303] Exemplary preferred compositions of the invention include oligonucleotides that comprise at least the 8 consecutive nucleobases from the 5′-terminus of a targeted nucleic acid e.g. a cellular gene or mRNA transcribed from the gene (the remaining nucleobases being a consecutive stretch of the same oligonucleotide beginning immediately upstream of the 5′-terminus of the antisense compound which is specifically hybridizable to the target nucleic acid and continuing until the oligonucleotide contains from about 8 to about 80 nucleobases). Similarly preferred compositions of the invention are represented by oligonucleotide sequences that comprise at least the 8 consecutive nucleobases from the 3′-terminus of one of the illustrative preferred antisense compounds (the remaining nucleobases being a consecutive stretch of the same oligonucleotide beginning immediately downstream of the 3′-terminus of the antisense compound which is specifically hybridizable to the target nucleic acid and continuing until the oligonucleotide contains from about 8 to about 80 nucleobases). One having skill in the art armed with the preferred compositions of the invention illustrated herein will be able, without undue experimentation, to identify further preferred antisense compounds.

[0304] Once one or more target regions, segments or sites have been identified, compositions of the invention are chosen which are sufficiently complementary to the target, i.e., hybridize sufficiently well and with sufficient specificity, to give the desired effect.

[0305] In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a series of preferred compositions of the invention can be designed for a specific target or targets. The ends of the strands may be blunt or modified by the addition of one or more natural or modified nucleobases to form an overhang. The sense strand of the duplex is then designed and synthesized as the complement of the antisense strand and may also contain modifications or additions to either terminus. For example, in one embodiment, both strands of the duplex would be complementary over the central nucleobases, each optionally having overhangs at one or both termini.

[0306] For example, a duplex comprising an antisense oligonucleotide having the sequence CGAGAGGCGGACGGGACCG (SEQ ID NO.: 1) and having a two-nucleobase overhang of deoxythymidine(dT) would have the following structure:

[0307]

	SEQ
	ID
	NO.
cgagaggcggacgggaccgdTdT	Antisense Strand	2
|||||||||||||||||||
dTdTgctctccgcctgccctggc	Complement Strand	3
or could be blunt ended excluding
the deoxythymidine (dT's):
cgagaggcggacgggaccg	Antisense Strand	1
|||||||||||||||||||
gctctccgcctgccctggc	Complement Strand	4

[0308] RNA strands of the duplex can be synthesized by methods disclosed herein or purchased from various RNA synthesis companies such as for example Dharmacon Research Inc., (Lafayette, Colo.). Once synthesized, the complementary strands are annealed. The single strands are aliquoted and diluted to a concentration of 50 uM. Once diluted, 30 uL of each strand is combined with 15 uL of a 5× solution of annealing buffer. The final concentration of the buffer is 100 mM potassium acetate, 30 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.4, and 2 mM magnesium acetate. The final volume is 75 uL. This solution is incubated for 1 minute at 90° C. and then centrifuged for 15 seconds. The tube is allowed to sit for 1 hour at 37° C. at which time the dsRNA duplexes are used in experimentation. The final concentration of the dsRNA compound is 20 uM. This solution can be stored frozen (−20° C.) and freeze-thawed up to 5 times.

[0309] Once prepared, the desired synthetic complexes of duplexs are evaluated for their ability to modulate target expression. When cells reach 80% confluency, they are treated with synthetic duplexs comprising at least one oligonucleotide of the invention. For cells grown in 96-well plates, wells are washed once with 200 μL OPTI-MEM-1 reduced-serum medium (Gibco BRL) and then treated with 130 μL of OPTI-MEM-1 containing 12 μg/mL LIPOFECTIN (Gibco BRL) and the desired dsRNA compound at a final concentration of 200 nM. After 5 hours of treatment, the medium is replaced with fresh medium. Cells are harvested 16 hours after treatment, at which time RNA is isolated and target reduction measured by RT-PCR.

[0310] In a further embodiment, the “preferred target segments” identified herein may be employed in a screen for additional oligomeric compounds that modulate the expression of a target. “Modulators” are those oligomeric compounds that decrease or increase the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a target and which comprise at least an 8-nucleobase portion which is complementary to a preferred target segment. The screening method comprises the steps of contacting a preferred target segment of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a target with one or more candidate modulators, and selecting for one or more candidate modulators which decrease or increase the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a target. Once it is shown that the candidate modulator or modulators are capable of modulating (e.g. either decreasing or increasing) the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a target, the modulator may then be employed in further investigative studies of the function of a target, or for use as a research, diagnostic, or therapeutic agent in accordance with the present invention.

Hybridization

[0311] In the context of this invention, “hybridization” occurs when two sequences come together with enough base complementarity to form a double stranded region. The source of the two sequences can be synthetic or native and can occur in a single strand when the strand has regions of self complementarity. In the present invention, the preferred mechanism of pairing involves hydrogen bonding, which may be Watson-Crick, Hoogsteen or reversed Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding, between complementary nucleoside or nucleotide bases (nucleobases) of the strands of oligonucleotides or between an oligonucleotide and a target nucleic acid. For example, adenine and thymine are complementary nucleobases which pair through the formation of hydrogen bonds. Hybridization can occur under varying circumstances.

[0312] Compositions of the present invention are specifically hybridizable when binding to a target nucleic acid interferes with the normal function of the target nucleic acid and causes a loss of activity, and there is a sufficient degree of complementarity to avoid non-specific binding to non-target nucleic acid sequences under conditions in which specific binding is desired, i.e., under physiological conditions in the case of in vivo assays or therapeutic treatment, and under conditions in which assays are performed in the case of in vitro assays.

[0313] In the present invention the phrase “stringent hybridization conditions” or “stringent conditions” refers to conditions under which compositions of the invention will hybridize to its target sequence, but to a minimal number of other sequences. Stringent conditions are sequence-dependent and will vary with different circumstances and in the context of this invention, “stringent conditions” under which oligomeric compounds hybridize to a target sequence are determined by the nature and composition of the oligomeric compounds and the assays in which they are being investigated.

[0314] “Complementary,” as used herein, refers to the capacity for precise pairing of two nucleobases regardless of where the two are located. For example, if a nucleobase at a certain position of an oligonucleotide is capable of hydrogen bonding with a nucleobase at a certain position of a target nucleic acid, the target nucleic acid being a DNA, RNA, or oligonucleotide molecule, then the position of hydrogen bonding between the oligonucleotide and the target nucleic acid is considered to be a complementary position. The oligonucleotide and the further DNA, RNA, or oligonucleotide molecule are complementary to each other when a sufficient number of complementary positions in each molecule are occupied by nucleobases which can hydrogen bond with each other. Thus, “specifically hybridizable” and “complementary” are terms which are used to indicate a sufficient degree of precise pairing or complementarity over a sufficient number of nucleobases such that stable and specific binding occurs between the oligonucleotide and a target nucleic acid.

[0315] It is understood in the art that the sequence of an oligomeric compound need not be 100% complementary to that of its target nucleic acid to be specifically hybridizable. Moreover, an oligmeric compound may hybridize over one or more segments such that intervening or adjacent segments are not involved in the hybridization event (e.g., a loop structure or hairpin structure). It is preferred that the oligmeric compounds of the present invention comprise at least 70% sequence complementarity to a target region within the target nucleic acid, more preferably that they comprise 90% sequence complementarity and even more preferably comprise 95% sequence complementarity to the target region within the target nucleic acid sequence to which they are targeted. For example, an oligmeric compound in which 18 of 20 nucleobases are complementary to a target region, and would therefore specifically hybridize, would represent 90 percent complementarity. In this example, the remaining noncomplementary nucleobases may be clustered or interspersed with complementary nucleobases and need not be contiguous to each other or to complementary nucleobases. As such, an oligmeric compound which is 18 nucleobases in length having 4 (four) noncomplementary nucleobases which are flanked by two regions of complete complementarity with the target nucleic acid would have 77.8% overall complementarity with the target nucleic acid and would thus fall within the scope of the present invention. Percent complementarity of an oligmeric compound with a region of a target nucleic acid can be determined routinely using BLAST programs (basic local alignment search tools) and PowerBLAST programs known in the art (Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 215, 403-410; Zhang and Madden, Genome Res., 1997, 7, 649-656).

Screening and Target Validation

[0316] In a further embodiment, “preferred target segments” may be employed in a screen for additional oligmeric compounds that modulate the expression of a selected protein. “Modulators” are those oligmeric compounds that decrease or increase the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a protein and which comprise at least an 8-nucleobase portion which is complementary to a preferred target segment. The screening method comprises the steps of contacting a preferred target segment of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a protein with one or more candidate modulators, and selecting for one or more candidate modulators which decrease or increase the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a protein. Once it is shown that the candidate modulator or modulators are capable of modulating (e.g. either decreasing or increasing) the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding a peptide, the modulator may then be employed in further investigative studies of the function of the peptide, or for use as a research, diagnostic, or therapeutic agent in accordance with the present invention.

[0317] The preferred target segments of the present invention may also be combined with their respective complementary oligmeric compounds of the present invention to form stabilized double-stranded (duplexed) oligmeric compound with oligonucleotides being preferred. Such double stranded oligonucleotide moieties have been shown in the art to modulate target expression and regulate translation as well as RNA processsing via an antisense mechanism. Moreover, the double-stranded moieties may be subject to chemical modifications (Fire et al., Nature, 1998, 391, 806-811; Timmons and Fire, Nature 1998, 395, 854; Timmons et al., Gene, 2001, 263, 103-112; Tabara et al., Science, 1998, 282, 430-431; Montgomery et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95, 15502-15507; Tuschl et al., Genes Dev., 1999, 13, 3191-3197; Elbashir et al., Nature, 2001, 411, 494-498; Elbashir et al., Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 188-200). For example, such double-stranded moieties have been shown to inhibit the target by the classical hybridization of antisense strand of the duplex to the target, thereby triggering enzymatic degradation of the target (Tijsterman et al., Science, 2002, 295, 694-697).

[0318] The compositions of the present invention can also be applied in the areas of drug discovery and target validation. The present invention comprehends the use of the compositions and preferred targets identified herein in drug discovery efforts to elucidate relationships that exist between proteins and a disease state, phenotype, or condition. These methods include detecting or modulating a target peptide comprising contacting a sample, tissue, cell, or organism with the compositions of the present invention, measuring the nucleic acid or protein level of the target and/or a related phenotypic or chemical endpoint at some time after treatment, and optionally comparing the measured value to a non-treated sample or sample treated with a further oligonucleotide of the invention. These methods can also be performed in parallel or in combination with other experiments to determine the function of unknown genes for the process of target validation or to determine the validity of a particular gene product as a target for treatment or prevention of a particular disease, condition, or phenotype.

[0319] Effect of nucleoside modifications on RNAi activity is evaluated according to existing literature (Elbashir et al., Nature (2001), 411, 494-498; Nishikura et al., Cell (2001), 107, 415-416; and Bass et al., Cell (2000), 101, 235-238.)

Kits, Research Reagents, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics

[0320] The compositions of the present invention can be utilized for diagnostics, therapeutics, prophylaxis and as research reagents and kits. Furthermore, compositions of the present invention, which are able to inhibit gene expression with exquisite specificity, can be used by those of ordinary skill to elucidate the function of particular genes or to distinguish between functions of various members of a biological pathway.

[0321] For use in kits and diagnostics, the compositions of the present invention, either alone or in combination with other oligonucleotides or therapeutics, can be used as tools in differential and/or combinatorial analyses to elucidate expression patterns of a portion or the entire complement of genes expressed within cells and tissues.

[0322] As one nonlimiting example, expression patterns within cells or tissues treated with one or more compositions of the present invention are compared to untreated control cells or tissues and the patterns produced are analyzed for differential levels of gene expression as they pertain, for example, to disease association, signaling pathway, cellular localization, expression level, size, structure or function of the genes examined. These analyses can be performed on stimulated or unstimulated cells and in the presence or absence of other compounds and or oligonucleotides that affect expression patterns.

[0323] Examples of methods of gene expression analysis known in the art include DNA arrays or microarrays (Brazma and Vilo, FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 17-24; Celis, et al., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2-16), SAGE (serial analysis of gene expression)(Madden, et al., Drug Discov. Today, 2000, 5, 415-425), READS (restriction enzyme amplification of digested cDNAs) (Prashar and Weissman, Methods Enzymol., 1999, 303, 258-72), TOGA (total gene expression analysis) (Sutcliffe, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2000, 97, 1976-81), protein arrays and proteomics (Celis, et al., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2-16; Jungblut, et al., Electrophoresis, 1999, 20, 2100-10), expressed sequence tag (EST) sequencing (Celis, et al., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2-16; Larsson, et al., J. Biotechnol., 2000, 80, 143-57), subtractive RNA fingerprinting (SuRF) (Fuchs, et al., Anal. Biochem., 2000, 286, 91-98; Larson, et al., Cytometry, 2000,41, 203-208), subtractive cloning, differential display (DD) (Jurecic and Belmont, Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 2000, 3, 316-21), comparative genomic hybridization (Carulli, et al., J. Cell Biochem. Suppl., 1998, 31, 286-96), FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) techniques (Going and Gusterson, Eur. J. Cancer, 1999, 35, 1895-904) and mass spectrometry methods (To, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen, 2000, 3, 235-41).

[0324] The compositions of the present invention are useful for research and diagnostic applications. In one aspect of the present invention the compositions are useful for research and diagnostics in applications that involve the hybridization of compositions to nucleic acids encoding proteins. For example, oligomeric compounds that are shown to hybridize with such efficiency and under such conditions as disclosed herein as to be effective protein inhibitors will also be effective primers or probes under conditions favoring gene amplification or detection, respectively. These primers and probes are useful in methods requiring the specific detection of nucleic acid molecules encoding proteins and in the amplification of the nucleic acid molecules for detection or for use in further studies. Hybridization of the antisense oligonucleotides, particularly the primers and probes, of the invention with a nucleic acid can be detected by means known in the art. Such means may include conjugation of an enzyme to the oligonucleotide, radiolabelling of the oligonucleotide or any other suitable detection means. Kits using such detection means for detecting the level of selected proteins in a sample may also be prepared.

[0325] The specificity and sensitivity of antisense methodologies is also harnessed by those of skill in the art for therapeutic uses. Antisense oligonucleotides have been employed as therapeutic moieties in the treatment of disease states in animals, including humans. Antisense oligonucleotide drugs, including ribozymes, have been safely and effectively administered to humans and numerous clinical trials are presently underway. It is thus established that antisense oligonucleotides can be useful therapeutic modalities that can be configured to be useful in treatment regimes for the treatment of cells, tissues and animals, especially humans.

[0326] For therapeutics, an animal, preferably a human, suspected of having a disease or disorder which can be treated by modulating the expression of a selected protein is treated by administering compositions in accordance with this invention. For example, in one non-limiting embodiment, the methods comprise the step of administering to the animal in need of treatment, a therapeutically effective amount of a protein inhibitor. The protein inhibitors of the present invention effectively inhibit the activity of the protein or inhibit the expression of the protein. In one embodiment, the activity or expression of a protein in an animal is inhibited by about 10%. Preferably, the activity or expression of a protein in an animal is inhibited by about 30%. More preferably, the activity or expression of a protein in an animal is inhibited by 50% or more.

[0327] For example, the reduction of the expression of a protein may be measured in serum, adipose tissue, liver or any other body fluid, tissue or organ of the animal. Preferably, the cells contained within the fluids, tissues or organs being analyzed contain a nucleic acid molecule encoding a protein and/or the protein itself.

[0328] The compositions of the present invention can be utilized in pharmaceutical compositions by adding an effective amount to a suitable pharmaceutically acceptable diluent or carrier. Use of the compositions and methods of the invention may also be useful prophylactically.

Formulations

[0329] The compositions of the present invention may also be admixed, encapsulated, conjugated or otherwise associated with other molecules, molecule structures or mixtures of compounds, as for example, liposomes, receptor-targeted molecules, oral, rectal, topical or other formulations, for assisting in uptake, distribution and/or absorption.

[0330] Representative U.S. patents that teach the preparation of such uptake, distribution and/or absorption-assisting formulations include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,108,921; 5,354,844; 5,416,016; 5,459,127; 5,521,291; 5,543,158; 5,547,932; 5,583,020; 5,591,721; 4,426,330; 4,534,899; 5,013,556; 5,108,921; 5,213,804; 5,227,170; 5,264,221; 5,356,633; 5,395,619; 5,416,016; 5,417,978; 5,462,854; 5,469,854; 5,512,295; 5,527,528; 5,534,259; 5,543,152; 5,556,948; 5,580,575; and 5,595,756, each of which is herein incorporated by reference.

[0331] The compositions of the present invention encompass any pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters, or salts of such esters, or any other compound which, upon administration to an animal, including a human, is capable of providing (directly or indirectly) the biologically active metabolite or residue thereof. Accordingly, for example, the disclosure is also drawn to prodrugs and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compositions of the invention, pharmaceutically acceptable salts of such prodrugs, and other bioequivalents. The term “prodrug” indicates a therapeutic agent that is prepared in an inactive form that is converted to an active form (i.e., drug) within the body or cells thereof by the action of endogenous enzymes or other chemicals and/or conditions. In particular, prodrug versions of the compositions of the invention are prepared as SATE [(S-acetyl-2-thioethyl)phosphate] derivatives according to the methods disclosed in WO 93/24510 to Gosselin et al., published Dec. 9, 1993 or in WO 94/26764 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,770,713 to Imbach et al.

[0332] The term “pharmaceutically acceptable salts” refers to physiologically and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compositions of the invention: i.e., salts that retain the desired biological activity of the parent compound and do not impart undesired toxicological effects thereto. For oligonucleotides, preferred examples of pharmaceutically acceptable salts and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

[0333] The present invention also includes pharmaceutical compositions and formulations which include the compositions of the present invention. The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention may be administered in a number of ways depending upon whether local or systemic treatment is desired and upon the area to be treated. Administration may be topical (including ophthalmic and to mucous membranes including vaginal and rectal delivery), pulmonary, e.g., by inhalation or insufflation of powders or aerosols, including by nebulizer; intratracheal, intranasal, epidermal and transdermal), oral or parenteral. Parenteral administration includes intravenous, intraarterial, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal or intramuscular injection or infusion; or intracranial, e.g., intrathecal or intraventricular, administration. Oligonucleotides with at least one 2′-O-methoxyethyl modification are believed to be particularly useful for oral administration. Pharmaceutical compositions and formulations for topical administration may include transdermal patches, ointments, lotions, creams, gels, drops, suppositories, sprays, liquids and powders. Conventional pharmaceutical carriers, aqueous, powder or oily bases, thickeners and the like may be necessary or desirable. Coated condoms, gloves and the like may also be useful.

[0334] The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention, which may conveniently be presented in unit dosage form, may be prepared according to conventional techniques well known in the pharmaceutical industry. Such techniques include the step of bringing into association the active ingredients with the pharmaceutical carrier(s) or excipient(s). In general, the formulations are prepared by uniformly and intimately bringing into association the active ingredients with liquid carriers or finely divided solid carriers or both, and then, if necessary, shaping the product.

[0335] The compositions of the present invention may be formulated into any of many possible dosage forms such as, but not limited to, tablets, capsules, gel capsules, liquid syrups, soft gels, suppositories, and enemas. The compositions of the present invention may also be formulated as suspensions in aqueous, non-aqueous or mixed media. Aqueous suspensions may further contain substances which increase the viscosity of the suspension including, for example, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, sorbitol and/or dextran. The suspension may also contain stabilizers.

[0336] Pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention include, but are not limited to, solutions, emulsions, foams and liposome-containing formulations. The pharmaceutical compositions and formulations of the present invention may comprise one or more penetration enhancers, carriers, excipients or other active or inactive ingredients.

[0337] Emulsions are typically heterogenous systems of one liquid dispersed in another in the form of droplets usually exceeding 0.1 μm in diameter. Emulsions may contain additional components in addition to the dispersed phases, and the active drug which may be present as a solution in either the aqueous phase, oily phase or itself as a separate phase. Microemulsions are included as an embodiment of the present invention. Emulsions and their uses are well known in the art and are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

[0338] Formulations of the present invention include liposomal formulations. As used in the present invention, the term “liposome” means a vesicle composed of amphiphilic lipids arranged in a spherical bilayer or bilayers. Liposomes are unilamellar or multilamellar vesicles which have a membrane formed from a lipophilic material and an aqueous interior that contains the composition to be delivered. Cationic liposomes are positively charged liposomes which are believed to interact with negatively charged DNA molecules to form a stable complex. Liposomes that are pH-sensitive or negatively-charged are believed to entrap DNA rather than complex with it. Both cationic and noncationic liposomes have been used to deliver DNA to cells.

[0339] Liposomes also include “sterically stabilized” liposomes, a term which, as used herein, refers to liposomes comprising one or more specialized lipids that, when incorporated into liposomes, result in enhanced circulation lifetimes relative to liposomes lacking such specialized lipids. Examples of sterically stabilized liposomes are those in which part of the vesicle-forming lipid portion of the liposome comprises one or more glycolipids or is derivatized with one or more hydrophilic polymers, such as a polyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety. Liposomes and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

[0340] The pharmaceutical formulations and compositions of the present invention may also include surfactants. The use of surfactants in drug products, formulations and in emulsions is well known in the art. Surfactants and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

[0341] In one embodiment, the present invention employs various penetration enhancers to effect the efficient delivery of nucleic acids, particularly oligonucleotides. In addition to aiding the diffusion of non-lipophilic drugs across cell membranes, penetration enhancers also enhance the permeability of lipophilic drugs. Penetration enhancers may be classified as belonging to one of five broad categories, i.e., surfactants, fatty acids, bile salts, chelating agents, and non-chelating non-surfactants. Penetration enhancers and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

[0342] One of skill in the art will recognize that formulations are routinely designed according to their intended use, i.e. route of administration.

[0343] Preferred formulations for topical administration include those in which the compositions of the invention are in admixture with a topical delivery agent such as lipids, liposomes, fatty acids, fatty acid esters, steroids, chelating agents and surfactants. Preferred lipids and liposomes include neutral (e.g. dioleoylphosphatidyl DOPE ethanolamine, dimyristoylphosphatidyl choline DMPC, distearolyphosphatidyl choline) negative (e.g. dimyristoylphosphatidyl glycerol DMPG) and cationic (e.g. dioleoyltetramethylaminopropyl DOTAP and dioleoylphosphatidyl ethanolamine DOTMA).

[0344] For topical or other administration, compositions of the present invention may be encapsulated within liposomes or may form complexes thereto, in particular to cationic liposomes. Alternatively, compositions of the present invention may be complexed to lipids, in particular to cationic lipids. Preferred fatty acids and esters, pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety. Topical formulations are described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/315,298 filed on May 20, 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

[0345] Compositions and formulations for oral administration include powders or granules, microparticulates, nanoparticulates, suspensions or solutions in water or non-aqueous media, capsules, gel capsules, sachets, tablets or minitablets. Thickeners, flavoring agents, diluents, emulsifiers, dispersing aids or binders may be desirable. Preferred oral formulations are those in which compositions of the invention are administered in conjunction with one or more penetration enhancers surfactants and chelators. Preferred surfactants include fatty acids and/or esters or salts thereof, bile acids and/or salts thereof. Preferred bile acids/salts and fatty acids and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety. Also preferred are combinations of penetration enhancers, for example, fatty acids/salts in combination with bile acids/salts. A particularly preferred combination is the sodium salt of lauric acid, capric acid and UDCA. Further penetration enhancers include polyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene-20-cetyl ether. Compositions of the present invention may be delivered orally, in granular form including sprayed dried particles, or complexed to form micro or nanoparticles. Oligonucleotide complexing agents and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety. Oral formulations for oligonucleotides and their preparation are described in detail in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/108,673 (filed Jul. 1, 1998), U.S. application Ser. No. 09/315,298 (filed May 20, 1999) and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/071,822, filed Feb. 8, 2002, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

[0346] Compositions and formulations for parenteral, intrathecal or intraventricular administration may include sterile aqueous solutions that may also contain buffers, diluents and other suitable additives such as, but not limited to, penetration enhancers, carrier compounds and other pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or excipients.

[0347] Certain embodiments of the invention provide pharmaceutical compositions containing one or more of the compositions of the present invention and one or more other chemotherapeutic agents which function by a non-antisense mechanism. Examples of such chemotherapeutic agents include but are not limited to cancer chemotherapeutic drugs such as daunorubicin, daunomycin, dactinomycin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin, esorubicin, bleomycin, mafosfamide, ifosfamide, cytosine ara-binoside, bis-chloroethylnitrosurea, busulfan, mitomycin C, actinomycin D, mithramycin, prednisone, hydroxyprogesterone, testosterone, tamoxifen, dacarbazine, procarbazine, hexamethylmelamine, pentamethylmelamine, mitoxantrone, amsacrine, chlorambucil, methylcyclohexylnitrosurea, nitrogen mustards, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, cytarabine, 5-azacytidine, hydroxyurea, deoxycoformycin, 4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphoramide, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (5-FUdR), methotrexate (MTX), colchicine, taxol, vincristine, vinblastine, etoposide (VP-16), trimetrexate, irinotecan, topotecan, gemcitabine, teniposide, cisplatin and diethylstilbestrol (DES). When used with the compositions of the invention, such chemotherapeutic agents may be used individually (e.g., 5-FU and oligonucleotide), sequentially (e.g., 5-FU and oligonucleotide for a period of time followed by MTX and oligonucleotide), or in combination with one or more other such chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., 5-FU, MTX and oligonucleotide, or 5-FU, radiotherapy and oligonucleotide). Anti-inflammatory drugs, including but not limited to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids, and antiviral drugs, including but not limited to ribivirin, vidarabine, acyclovir and ganciclovir, may also be combined in compositions of the invention. Combinations of compositions of the invention and other non-antisense drugs are also within the scope of this invention. One or more compositions of the invention can be used in combination with other therapeutic agents to create a cocktail as is currently the strategy for certain viral infections.

[0348] In another related embodiment, therapeutically effective combination therapies may comprise the use of two or more oligonucleotides and or compositions of the present invention wherein the multiple compositions are targeted to a single or multiple nucleic acid targets. Numerous examples of antisense oligonucleotides are known in the art. Two or more combined compounds may be used together or sequentially

Dosing

[0349] The formulation of therapeutic compositions and their subsequent administration (dosing) is believed to be within the skill of those in the art. Dosing is dependent on severity and responsiveness of the disease state to be treated, with the course of treatment lasting from several days to several months, or until a cure is effected or a diminution of the disease state is achieved. Optimal dosing schedules can be calculated from measurements of drug accumulation in the body of the patient. Persons of ordinary skill can easily determine optimum dosages, dosing methodologies and repetition rates. Optimum dosages may vary depending on the relative potency of individual oligonucleotides, and can generally be estimated based on EC₅₀s found to be effective in in vitro and in vivo animal models. In general, dosage is from 0.01 ug to 100 g per kg of body weight, and may be given once or more daily, weekly, monthly or yearly, or even once every 2 to 20 years. Persons of ordinary skill in the art can easily estimate repetition rates for dosing based on measured residence times and concentrations of the drug in bodily fluids or tissues. Following successful treatment, it may be desirable to have the patient undergo maintenance therapy to prevent the recurrence of the disease state, wherein the oligonucleotide is administered in maintenance doses, ranging from 0.01 ug to 100 g per kg of body weight, once or more daily, to once every 20 years.

[0350] While the present invention has been described with specificity in accordance with certain of its preferred embodiments, the following examples serve only to illustrate the invention and are not intended to limit the same.

Alternating 2′-O-Methyl siRNA's Targeting PTEN

[0351] A dose response was performed in the PTEN system to look at positional effects of alternating 2′-O-methyl constructs in asRNA and siRNA constructs.

[0352]

SEQ ID NO/ISIS NO	SEQUENCES 5′-3′
8/335454	5′-P-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU	(P = S, antisense)
9/335455	5′-P-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU	(P = S, antisense)
10/335456	5′-P-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU	(P = O, antisense)
11/335457	5′-P-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU	(P = O, antisense)
12/303912	5′-P-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU	(P = S, antisense)
13/308746	AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA	(P = O, sense)
14/335452	AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA	(P = O, sense)
15/335453	AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA	(P = O, sense)
siRNA duplexes (5′,3′-sense and 3′,5′-antisense)	Activity (150 nm)
13/308746 (S, P = O)	5′-AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA-3′	14.8
12/303912 (AS, P = S)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′
(unmodified standard)
siRNA duplexes (5′,3′-sense and 3′,5′-antisense)	Activity (150 nm)
14/335452 (S, P = O)	5′-AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA-3′
8/335454 (AS, P = S)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	43.8
10/335456 (AS, P = O)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	41.0
9/335455 (AS, P = S)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	53.1
11/335457 (AS, P = O)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	49.7
15/335453 (S, P = O)	5′-AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA-3′
8/335454 (AS, P = S)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	54.3
10/335456 (AS, P = O)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	50.3
9/335455 (AS, P = S)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	52.2
11/335457 (AS, P = O)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	52.8
13/308746 (S, P = O)	5′-AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA-3′
8/335454 (AS, P = S)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	40.0
10/335456 (AS, P = O)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	26.3
9/335455 (AS, P = S)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	56.6
11/335457 (AS, P = O)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	74.4
asRNA single stranded (5′,3′-sense and 3′,5′-antisense)	Activity (200 nm)
12/303912 (AS, P = S)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	27.9
8/335454 (AS, P = S)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	53.5
10/335456 (AS, P = O)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	93.2
9/335455 (AS, P = S)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	48.3
11/335457 (AS, P = O)	3′-UUCAUUCCUGGUCUCUGUUU-P-5′	89.6
SEQ ID NO:	Sequence (5′-3′)
12	UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU
13	AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA
Underlined = 2′-O-methyl and 5′-P- is a 5′-phosphate group.

[0353] The asRNA assay was run as a dose response with only the 200 nm dose shown (0, 50, 100 and 200 nm). The siRNA assay was also performed as a dose response with only the 150 nm dose shown (20, 40 80, 150 nm).

Alternating 2′-F siRNA's Targeting PTEN in T-24 Cells

[0354] A dose response was performed in the PTEN system to look at positional effects of alternating 2′-F constructs in asRNA constructs.

[0355]

SEQ ID NO/ISIS NO	SEQUENCE
13/308746	5′-P-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG AC AAA-3′	(PO, S, RNA)
12/303912	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′	(PS, AS, RNA)
16/339927	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S, deoxy)
17/339923	3′-OH-UTC AUT CmCU G,uns GT CTC TGT UT-5′-P	(PO, AS, deoxy)
18/339928	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA mCCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S, deoxy)
17/339923	3′-OH-UTC AUT CmCUGGT CTC TGT UT-5′-P	(PO, AS, deoxy)
13/308746	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S, RNA)
17/339923	3′-OH-UTC AUT CmCUGGT CTC TGT UT-5′-P	(PO, AS, deoxy)
16/339927	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S, deoxy)
17/339924	3′-OH-UTC AUT CmCUGGT CTC TGT UT-5′-P	(PS, AS, deoxy)
18/339928	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA mCCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S, deoxy)
19/339924	3′-OH-UTC AUT CmCUGGT CTC TGT UT-5′-P	(PS, AS, deoxy)
13/308746	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S, RNA)
19/339924	3′-OH-UTC AUT CmCUGGT CTC TGT UT-5′-P	(PS, AS, deoxy)

[0356] Underlined nucleosides are 2′-F modified nucleosides, all other nucleosides are ribonucleosides (RNA) or 2′-deoxyribonucleosides (deoxy) as annotated, PO and PS are phosphodiester and phosphorothioate respectively, 5′-P is 5′-phosphate, and ^mC's are 5-methyl cytidines.

[0357]

	SEQ ID NO:	Sequence (5′-3′)
	20	TUTGTCTCTGGUCCTUACTU

[0358] The above siRNA constructs were assayed to determine the effects of the full alternating 2′-F/2′-deoxy antisense strands (PO or PS) as compared to sense strands having full alternating 2′-F/2′-deoxy (PO). The siRNA construct having PO sense and PS antisense strands that are full RNA was prepared for comparison.

[0359] The activities are listed below:

[0360]

siRNA	Activity (% untreated control 150 nM)
Construct		Sense	Antisense
308746/303912	16%	PO unmodified RNA	/PS unmodified RNA
339927/339923	81%	PO deoxy alternating 3′-1	/PO deoxy alternating 5′-1
339927/339924	39%	PO deoxy alternating 3′-1	/PS deoxy alternating 5′-1
339928/339923	81%	PO deoxy alternating 3′-0	/PO deoxy alternating 5′-1
339928/339924	39%	PO deoxy alternating 3′-0	/PS deoxy alternating 5′-1
308746/339923	43%	PO unmodified RNA	/PO deoxy alternating 5′-1
308746/339924	37%	PO unmodified RNA	/PS deoxy alternating 5′-1

[0361] The alternating 3′-1 (sense strand) means that the alternating 2′-F groups start adjacent to the 3′-nucleoside and 3′-0 means the 2′-F starts alternating at the 3′-terminal nucleoside, alternating 5′-1 (antisense strand) means that the alternating 2′-F groups start adjacent to the 5′-nucleoside.

Alternating 2′-F siRNA's Targeting PTEN in T-24 Cells

[0362] A dose response was performed in the PTEN system to look at positional effects of alternating 2′-F constructs in asRNA constructs.

[0363]

SEQ ID NO/ISIS NO	SEQUENCE
13/308746	5′-P-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG AC AAA-3′	(PO, S, RNA)
12/303912	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′	(PS, AS, RNA)
16/339927	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S, deoxy)
21/339925	3′-OH-TUmC ATU mCCT GGU mCUmC UGU TU-5′-P	(PO, AS, deoxy)
18/339928	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA mCCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S, deoxy)
21/339925	3′-OH-TUmC ATU mCCT GGU mCUmC UGU TU-5′-P	(PO, AS, deoxy)
13/308746	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S, RNA)
21/339925	3′-OH-TUmC ATU mCCT GGU mCUmC UGU TU-5′-P	(PO, AS, deoxy)
16/339927	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S, deoxy)
21/339926	3′-OH-TUmC ATU mCCT GGU mCUmC UGU TU-5′-P	(PS, AS, deoxy)
18/339928	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA mCCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, AS, deoxy)
21/339926	3′-OH-TUmC ATU mCCT GGU mCUmC UGU TU-5′-P	(PO, S, deoxy)
13/308746	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S, RNA)
22/339926	3′-OH-TUmC ATU mCCT GGU mCUmC UGU TU-5′-P	(PS, AS, deoxy)

[0364] Underlined nucleosides are 2′-F modified nucleosides, all other nucleosides are ribonucleosides (RNA) or 2′-deoxyribonucleosides (deoxy) as annotated, PO and PS are phosphodiester and phosphorothioate respectively, 5′-P is 5′-phosphate, and ^mC's are 5-methyl cytidines.

[0365]

	SEQ ID NO:	Sequence (5′-3′)
	23	UTUGUCUCUGGTCCUTACUT

[0366] The above siRNA constructs were assayed to determine the effects of the full alternating 2′-F/2′-deoxy antisense strands (PO or PS) as compared to sense strands having full alternating 2′-F/2′-deoxy (PO). The siRNA construct having PO sense and PS antisense strands that are full RNA was prepared for comparison. The register of the antisense strand has been shifted relative to Example 2 (2′-F is at 5′-0 as opposed to 5′-1).

[0367] The activities are listed below:

[0368]

siRNA	Activity (% untreated control 150 nM)
Construct	Sense	Antisense
308746/303912	16% PO unmodified RNA	/PS unmodified RNA
339927/339925	86% PO deoxy	/PO deoxy alternating 5′-0
	alternating 3′-1
339927/339926	79% PO deoxy	/PS deoxy alternating 5′-0
	alternating 3′-1
339928/339925	51% PO deoxy	/PO deoxy alternating 5′-0
	alternating 3′-0
339928/339926	69% PO deoxy	/PS deoxy alternating 5′-0
	alternating 3′-0
308746/339925	73% PO unmodified RNA	/PO deoxy alternating 5′-0
308746/339926	52% PO unmodified RNA	/PS deoxy alternating 5′-0

[0369] The alternating 3′-1 (sense strand) means that the alternating 2′-F groups start adjacent to the 3′-nucleoside and 3′-0 means the 2′-F starts alternating at the 3′-terminal nucleoside, alternating 5′-1 (antisense strand) means that the alternating 2′-F groups start adjacent to the 5′-nucleoside.

Alternating 2′-O-Methyl/2′-F siRNA's Targeting PTEN in T-24 Cells

[0370] A dose response was performed in the PTEN system to look at positional effects of alternating 2′-O-Methyl/2′-F siRNA's.

[0371]

SEQ ID NO/ISIS NO	SEQUENCE (Bold = 2′-F, Underlined = 2′-OCH3)
13/308746	5′-P-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG AC AAA-3′	(PO, S, RNA)
12/303912	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′	(PS, AS, RNA)
24/340573	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S)
25/340569	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PO, AS)
26/340574	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S)
25/340569	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PO, AS)
13/308746	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, AS, RNA)
25/340569	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PO, AS)
24/340573	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S)
27/340570	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PS, AS)
26/340574	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S)
27/340570	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PS, AS)
13/308746	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, AS, RNA)
27/340570	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PS, AS)

[0372] Underlined nucleosides are 2′-OCH₃ modified nucleosides, bold are 2′-F modified nucleosides, PO and PS are phosphodiester and phosphorothioate respectively, 5′-P is 5′-phosphate, and ^mC's are 5-methyl cytidines.

[0373] The above siRNA constructs were assayed to determine the effects of the full alternating 2′-O-methyl/2′-F antisense strands (PO or PS) where the 5′-terminus of the antisense strands are 2′-F modified nucleosides with the remaining positions alternating. The sense strands were prepared with the positioning of the modified nucleosides in both orientations such that for each siRNA tested with 2′-O-methyl modified nucleosides begining at the the 3′-terminus of the sense strand another identical siRNA was prepared with 2′-F modified nucleosides begining at the the 3′-terminus of the sense strand. Another way to describe the differences between these two siRNA's is that the register of the sense strand is in both possible orientations with the register of the antisense strand being held constant in one orientation.

[0374] The activities are listed below:

[0375]

siRNA	Activity (% untreated control 150 nM)
Construct	Sense	Antisense
308746/303912	28% PO unmodified RNA	PS unmodified RNA
340574/340569	46% PO (2′-F, 3′-0)	PO (2′-F, 5′-0)
340574/340570	62% PO (2′-F, 3′-0)	PS (2′-F, 5′-0)
340573/340569	84% PO (2′-O-methyl, 3′-0)	PO (2′-F, 5′-0)
340573/340570	23% PO (2′-O-methyl, 3′-0)	PS (2′-F, 5′-0)
308746/340569	23% PO unmodified RNA	PO (2′-F, 5′-0)
308746/340570	38% PO unmodified RNA	PS (2′-F, 5′-0)

[0376] Within the alternating motif for this assay the antisense strands were prepared begining with a 2′-F group at the 5′-terminal nucleoside. The sense strands were prepared with the alternating motif begining at the 3′-terminal nucleoside with either the 2′-F (2′-F, 3′-0) or the 2′-O-methyl (2′-O-methyl, 3′-0). The siRNA constructs were prepared with the internucleoside linkages for the sense strand as full phosphodiester and the internucleoside linkages for the antisense strands as either full phosphodiester or phosphorothioate.

Alternating 2′-O-Methyl/2′-F siRNA's Targeting PTEN in T-24 Cells

[0377] A dose response was performed in the PTEN system to look at positional effects of alternating 2′-O-Methyl/2′-F siRNA's.

[0378]

SEQ ID NO/ISIS NO	SEQUENCE (Bold = 2′-F, Underlined = 2′-OCH3)
13/308746	5′-P-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG AC AAA-3′	(PO, S, RNA)
12/303912	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′	(PS, AS, RNA)
24/340573	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S)
28/340571	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PO, AS)
26/340574	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S)
28/340571	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PO, AS)
13/308746	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, AS, RNA)
28/340571	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PO, AS)
24/340573	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S)
29/340572	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PS, AS)
26/340574	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, S)
29/340572	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PS, AS)
13/308746	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, AS, RNA)
29/340572	3′-OH-UUC AUU CCU GGUC UGU UU-5′-P	(PS, AS)

[0379] Underlined nucleosides are 2′-F modified nucleosides, bold are 2′-F modified nucleosides, PO and PS are phosphodiester and phosphorothioate respectively, 5′-P is 5′-phosphate, and ^mC's are 5-methyl cytidines.

[0380] The above siRNA constructs were assayed to determine the effects of the full alternating 2′-O-methyl/2′-F antisense strands (PO or PS) where the 5′-terminus of the antisense strands are 2′-O-methyl modified nucleosides with the remaining positions alternating. The sense strands were prepared with the positioning of the modified nucleosides in both orientations such that for each siRNA tested with 2′-O-methyl modified nucleosides begining at the the 3′-terminus of the sense strand another identical siRNA was prepared with 2′-F modified nucleosides begining at the the 3′-terminus of the sense strand. Another way to describe the differences between these two siRNA's is that the register of the sense strand is in both possible orientations with the register of the antisense strand being held constant in one orientation.

[0381] The activities are listed below:

[0382]

siRNA	Activity (% untreated control 150 nM)
Construct	Sense	Antisense
308746/303912	27% PO unmodified RNA	PS unmodified RNA
340574/340571	112% PO (2′-F, 3′-0)	PO (2′-O-methyl, 5′-0)
340574/340572	81% PO (2′-F, 3′-0)	PS (2′-O-methyl, 5′-0)
340573/340571	40% PO (2′-O-methyl, 3′-0)	PO (2′-O-methyl, 5′-0)
340573/340572	71% PO (2′-O-methyl, 3′-0)	PS (2′-O-methyl, 5′-0)
308746/340571	46% PO unmodified RNA	PO (2′-O-methyl, 5′-0)
308746/340572	44% PO unmodified RNA	PS (2′-O-methyl, 5′-0)

[0383] Within the alternating motif for this assay the antisense strands were prepared begining with a 2′-F group at the 5′-terminal nucleoside. The sense strands were prepared with the alternating motif begining at the 3′-terminal nucleoside with either the 2′-F 2′-F, 3′-0) or the 2′-O-methyl (2′-O-methyl, 3′-0). The siRNA constructs were prepared with the internucleoside linkages for the sense strand as full phosphodiester and the internucleoside linkages for the antisense strands as either full phosphodiester or phosphorothioate.

Double Stranded Alternating Constructs

[0384] A number of double stranded constructs were also assayed in HeLa cells. The constructs and activities are shown below:

[0385]

SEQ ID NO/ISIS NO	SEQUENCES 5′-3′
12/303912	5′-PO-UU UGU CUC UGG UCC UUA CUU-3′	(AS, PS)
124/308746	5′-PO-AAG TAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(S, PO)
125/335452	5′-PO-AAG TAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, 2′-OMe)
15/335453	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, 2′-OMe)
8/335454	5′-PO-UU UGU CUC UGG UCC UUA CUU-3′	(PS, 2′-OMe)
9/335455	5′-PO-UU UGU CUC UGG UCC UUA CUU-3′3′	(PS, 2′-OMe)
10/335456	5′-PO-UU UGU CUC UGG UCC UUA CUU-3′	(PO, 2′-OMe)
11/335457	5′-PO-UU UGU CUC UGG UCC UUA CUU-3′3′	(PO, 2′-OMe)
17/339923	5′-PO-TU TGT CTC TGG UmCC TUA CTU-3′	(PO, 2′-F/2′-H)
19/339924	5′-PO-TU TGT CTC TGG UmCC TUA CTU-3′	(PS, 2′-F/2′-H)
21/339925	5′-PO-UT UGU mCUmC UGG TCmC UTA mCUT-3′	(PO, 2′-F/2′-H)
22/339926	5′-PO-UT UGU mCUmC UGG TCmC UTA mCUT-3′	(PS, 2′-F/2′-H)
126/339927	5′-PO-AAG TAA GGA mCCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PS, 2′-F/2′-H)
127/339928	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CmCA GAG AmCA AA-3′	(PO, 2′-F/2′-H)
25/340569	5′-PO-UUU GUC UCU GGU CCU UAC UU-3′	(PO, 2′-F/2′-OMe)
27/340570	5′-PO-UUU GUC UCU GGU CCU UAC UU-3′	(PS, 2′-F/2′-OMe)
128/340571	5′-PO-UUU GUC UCU GGU CCU UAC UU-3′	(PO, 2′-F/2′-OMe)
129/340572	5′-PO-UUU GUC UCU GGU CCU UAC UU-3′	(PS, 2′-F/2′-OMe)
130/340573	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, 2′-F/2′-OMe)
131/340574	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, 2′-F/2′-OMe)
30/344217	5′-PO-UUU GUC UCU GGU CCU UAC UU-3′	(PO, 2′-F)
31/344218	5′-PO-UUU GUC UCU GGU CCU UAC UU-3′	(PS, 2′-F)
32/344219	5′-PO-UUU GUC UCU GGU CCU UAC UU-3′	(PO, 2′-F)
33/344220	5′-PO-UUU GUC UCU GGU CCU UAC UU-3′	(PS, 2′-F)
34/344221	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, 2′-F)
35/344222	5′-PO-AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA-3′	(PO, 2′-F)

[0386] The particular constructs and their activities are shown below:

[0387]

	Double
	stranded construct		Activity
	Antisense	Sense	% UTC (dose; nM)	IC50 (nM)
	303912	308746	24 (100)	2
	339923	339927	52 (100)
	339923	339928	51 (100)	100
	339923	308746	41 (100)	12
	339924	339927	43 (100)	56
	339924	339928	34 (100)	51
	339924	308746	46 (100)	77
	339925	339927	78 (100)
	339925	339928	91 (100)
	339925	308746	65 (100)
	339926	339927	53 (100)
	339926	339928	47 (100)
	339926	308746	34 (100)	67
	335454	335452	52 (11)	19
	335454	335453	58 (11)	67
	335454	308746	63 (11)	34
	335455	335452	59 (11)	30
	335455	335453	54 (11)	15
	335455	308746	69 (100)
	335456	335452	45 (11)	3
	335456	335453	51 (11)	21
	335456	308746	38 (11)	1
	335457	335452	56 (100)
	335457	335453	52 (11)	14
	335457	308746	52 (100)
	340569	340573	67 (15)
	340569	340574	35 (15)	4
	340569	308746	19 (15)	0.2
	340570	340573	25 (15)	3
	340570	340574	77 (15)	92
	340570	308746	52 (15)	23
	340571	340573	32 (15)	4
	340571	340574	84 (15)
	340571	308746	38 (15)	4
	340572	340573	64 (15)
	340572	340574	71 (15)
	340572	308746	51 (15)	0.7
	344217	344222	23 (15)	0.7
	344217	308746	22 (15)	0.8
	344218	344221	28 (15)	3
	344218	344222	28 (15)	5
	344218	308746	28 (15)	3
	344219	344221	44 (15)	6
	344219	344222	40 (15)	6
	344219	308746	31 (15)	2
	344220	344221	47 (15)	33
	344220	344222	52 (15)	55
	344220	308746	44 (15)	23

[0388] A wide variety of additional alternating constructs have been prepared and screening in various assays is ongoing. Some representative constructs that have been made are shown below:

[0389]

SEQ ID NO/
ISIS NO	ANTISENSE SEQUENCES 5′-3′
36/335197	5′-P-TTTGTCTCTGGTCCTTACTT-OH	(AS, PS)
37/335198	5′-P-TTTGTCTCTGGTCCTTACTT-OH	(AS, PS)
38/335201	5′-P-TTTGTCTCTGGTCCTTACTT-OH	(AS, PO)
39/335202	5′-P-TTTGTCTCTGGTCCTTACTT-OH	(AS, PO)
40/335215	5′-P-UTUGUCUCUGGTCCUTACUT-OH	(AS, PS)
413/335216	5′-P-TUTGTCTCTGGUCCTUACTU-OH	(AS, PS)
42/335219	5′-P-UTUGUCUCUGGTCCUTACUT-OH	(AS, PO)
43/335220	5′-P-TUTGTCTCTGGUCCTUACTU-OH	(AS, PO)
44/xxxxx	5′-P-AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA-3′	(S, PO)
45/xxxxx	5′-P-AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA-3′	(S, PO)

[0390] For the above sequences, underlined is 2′-O-methoxyethyl, for the antisense strands (AS) the bold is 2′-H, for the sense strands (S) the bold is 2′-OH, PS indicates full phosphorothioate, PO indicates full phosphodiester, 5-P— is a 5′-phosphate group and all C nucleosides are 5′-methyl C's.

[0391] Each of the antisense strands were duplexed with each of the sense strands to give 16 different siRNA constructs.

[0392]

46/335211	5′-P-UTUGUCUCUGGTCCUTACUT-OH	(PS)
47/335212	5′-P-TUTGTCTCTGGUCCTUACTU-OH	(PS)
48/335213	5′-P-UTUGUCUCUGGTCCUTACUT-OH	(PO)
49/335214	5′-P-TUTGTCTCTGGUCCTUACTU-OH	(PO)
44/xxxxx	5′-P-AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA-3′	(S, PO)
45/xxxxx	5′-P-AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA-3′	(S, PO)

[0393] For the above sequences, underlined is 2′-O-methoxyethyl, for the antisense and the sense strands the bold is 2′-OH, PS indicates full phosphorothioate, PO indicates full phosphodiester, 5′-P— is a 5′-phosphate group and all C nucleosides are 5′-methyl C's.

[0394] Each of the antisense strands were duplexed with each of the sense strands to give 8 different siRNA constructs.

[0395]

50/335217	5′-P-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU-OH	(PS)
50/335218	5′-P-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU-OH	(PS)
51/335221	5′-P-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU-OH	(PO)
51/335222	5′-P-UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU-OH	(PO)
36/335199	5′-P-TTTGTCTCTGGTCCTTACTT-OH	(PS)
37/335200	5′-P-TTTGTCTCTGGTCCTTACTT-OH	(PS)
38/335203	5′-P-TTTGTCTCTGGTCCTTACTT-OH	(PO)
39/335204	5′-P-TTTGTCTCTGGTCCTTACTT-OH	(PO)
44/xxxxx	5′-P-AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA-3′	(S, PO)
45/xxxxx	5′-P-AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA-3′	(S, PO)

[0396] For the above sequences, underlined is 2′-O-methyl, for the antisense strands (AS) the bold is 2′-H, for the sense strands (S) the bold is 2′-OH, PS indicates full phosphorothioate, PO indicates full phosphodiester, 5′-P— is a 5′-phosphate group and all C nucleosides are 5′-methyl C's.

[0397] Each of the antisense strands were duplexed with each of the sense strands to give 16 different siRNA constructs.

[0398]

SEQ ID NO:	Sequence (5′-3′)
52	TTTGTCTCTGGTCCTTACTT
23	UTUGUCUCUGGTCCUTACUT
20	TUTGTCTCTGGUCCTUACTU
12	UUUGUCUCUGGUCCUUACUU
13	AAGUAAGGACCAGAGACAAA.

[0399] Reduction of endogenous PTEN mRNA in HeLa cells by 19- and 20-basepair siRNA is shown in this example. HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA in the presence of lipofectin and treated for 16 hours prior to lysis and analysis by RT-PCR. Maximum % reduction (Max Red) is the amount of mRNA reduction compared to untreated control cells at the highest concentration (150 nM), with IC50 indicating the interpolated concentration at which 50% reduction is achieved. The notation “5′-P-” indicates the presence of a 5′-phosphate. Bold nucleosides have 2′-OMe substituents. Otherwise the nucleosides have a 2′-OH substituent. The constructs have phosphodiester linkages unless underlined. Underlined nucleosides have phosphorthioate linkages.

[0400]

SEQ ID		IC50	Max
No.	siRNA	(nM)	Red
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	2.4	83
12	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	1.7	94
56	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
14	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	2.8	60
10	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
57	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA A -3′	0.55	90
58	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU U-5′
59	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA A -3′	1.2	95
60	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU U-5′
61	5′- GGG UAA AUA CAU UCU ACA U-3′	1.7	83
62	3′- CCC AUU UAU GUA AGA UGU A-5′
63	5′- GGG UAA AUA CAU UCU ACA U-3′	0.63	92
64	3′- CCC AUU UAU GUA AGA UGU A-5′
65	5′- UCA AAU CCA GAG GCU AGC A-3′	13.6	71
66	3′- AGU UUA GGU CUC CGA UCG U-5′
67	5′- UCA AAU CCA GAG GCU AGC A-3′	n.d.	20
68	3′- AGU UUA GGU CUC CGA UCG U-5′

[0401] Reduction of endogenous PTEN mRNA in HeLa cells by 20-basepair siRNA containing 2′-OMe modifications is shown in this example. HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA in the presence of lipofectin and treated for 16 hours prior to lysis and analysis by RT-PCR. Maximum % reduction is the amount of mRNA reduction compared to untreated control cells at the highest concentration (150 nM), with IC50 indicating the interpolated concentration at which 50% reduction is achieved. The notation “5′-P-” indicates the presence of a 5′-phosphate. Bold nucleosides have 2′-OMe substituents. Otherwise the nuclosides have a 2′-OH substituent. The constructs have phosphodiester linkages unless underlined. Underlined nuclosides have phosphorthioate linkages.

[0402]

SEQ ID		IC50	Max
No.	siRNA	(nM)	Red
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	1.1	79
12	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	1.2	71
10	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	37.4	48
69	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
14	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	2.6	60
10	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
14	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	19.2	47
69	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
70	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	21.1	59
10	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
70	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	66.6	44
69	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	136	47
71	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	440	31
72	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
70	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	14.2	62
71	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
70	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	14.7	57
72	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
14	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	179	36
71	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
14	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	29.5	51
72	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′

[0403] Reduction of endogenous PTEN mRNA in HeLa cells by 20-basepair siRNA containing 2′-F modifications is shown in this example. HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA in the presence of lipofectin and treated for 16 hours prior to lysis and analysis by RT-PCR. Maximum % reduction is the amount of mRNA reduction compared to untreated control cells at the highest concentration (150 nM), with IC50 indicating the interpolated concentration at which 50% reduction is achieved. The notation “5′-P-” indicates the presence of a 5′-phosphate. Bold nucleosides have 2′-F substituents. Otherwise the nuclosides have a 2′-OH substituent. The constructs have phosphodiester linkages unless underlined. Underlined nuclosides have phosphorthioate linkages.

[0404]

SEQ ID		IC50	Max
No.	siRNA	(nM)	Red
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	2.5	83
12	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	0.77	87
73	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	2.6	78
74	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
75	5′-P- AAG UAA GG A CCA GAG A CA AA -3′	0.67	86
73	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
75	5′- AAG UAA GG A CCA GAG A CA AA -3′	4.7	76
74	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
76	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	0.71	86
73	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
76	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	2.8	77
74	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	1.5	76
77	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	22.9	77
78	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
76	5′-P- AAG UA A GGA CC A GAG ACA AA -3′	6.1	71
77	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
76	5′-P- AAG UA A GGA CC A GAG ACA AA -3′	33.3	57
78	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
75	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	5.7	75
77	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
75	5′-P- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	54.7	54
78	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′

[0405] Reduction of endogenous PTEN mRNA in HeLa cells by 20-basepair siRNA containing 2′-F and 2′-deoxy (2′-H) modifications is shown in this example. HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA in the presence of lipofectin and treated for 16 hours prior to lysis and analysis by RT-PCR. Maximum % reduction is the amount of mRNA reduction compared to untreated control cells at the highest concentration (150 nM), with IC50 indicating the interpolated concentration at which 50% reduction is achieved. The notation “5′-P-” indicates the presence of a 5′-phosphate. Bold nucleosides have 2′-F substituents. Nucleosides with a “d” subscript have a deoxy sugar. Otherwise the nuclosides have a 2′-OH substituent. The constructs have phosphodiester linkages unless underlined. Underlined nuclosides have phosphorthioate linkages.

[0406]

	IC50
SEQ ID No.	siRNA	(nM)	Max Red
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	2.6	76
12	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	11.7	60
79	3′- UTdC AdUTd CCdU GdGTd CTdC TdGTdUTd-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	76.7	54
80	3′- UTdC AdUTd CCdU GdGTd CTdC TdGTdUTd-P-5′
81	5′- AdAGd UAdA GdGAd CCdA GdAGd ACdA AdA -3′	100	49
79	3′- UTdC AdUTd CCdU GdGTd CTdC TdGTdUTd-P-5′
81	5′- AdAGd UAdA GdGAd CCdA GdAGd ACdA AdA -3′	50.7	66
80	3′- UTdC AdUTd CCdU GdGTd CTdC TdGTdUTd-P-5′
82	5′- AAdG TdAAd GGdA CdCAd GAdG AdCAd AAd-3′	122	48
79	3′- UTdC AdUTd CCdU GdGTd CTdC TdGTdUTd-P-5′
82	5′- AAdG TdAAd GGdA CdCAd GAdG AdCAd AAd-3′	55.7	57
80	3′- UTdC AdUTd CCdU GdGTd CTdC TdGTdUTd-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	n.d.	35
83	3′- TUdC AdTUd CCdT GdGUd CUdC UdGUd TUd-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	66.8	48
84	3′- TUdC AdTUd CCdT GdGUd CUdC UdGUd TUd-P-5′
82	5′- AAdG TdAAd GGdA CdCAd GAdG AdCAd AAd-3′	n.d.	22
83	3′- TUdC AdTUd CCdT GdGUd CUdC UdGUd TUd-P-5′
82	5′- AAdG TdAAd GGdA CdCAd GAdG AdCAd AAd-3′	145	66
84	3′- TUdC AdTUd CCdT GdGUd CUdC UdGUd TUd-P-5′
81	5′- AdAGd UAdA GdGAd CCdA GdAGd ACdA AdA -3′	n.d.	9
83	3′- TUdC AdTUd CCdT GdGUd CUdC UdGUd TUd-P-5′
81	5′- AdAGd UAdA GdGAd CCdA GdAGd ACdA AdA -3′	158	58
84	3′- TUdC AdTUd CCdT GdGUd CUdC UdGUd TUd-P-5′

[0407] Reduction of endogenous PTEN mRNA in HeLa cells by 20-basepair siRNA containing 2′-F and 2′-OMe modifications is shown in this example. HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA in the presence of lipofectin and treated for 16 hours prior to lysis and analysis by RT-PCR. Maximum % reduction is the amount of mRNA reduction compared to untreated control cells at the highest concentration (150 nM), with IC50 indicating the interpolated concentration at which 50% reduction is achieved. The notation “5′-P-” indicates the presence of a 5′-phosphate. Bold nucleosides have 2′-F substituents. Nucleosides with a “m” subscript have 2′-OMe substituents. Otherwise the nucleosides have a 2′-OH substituent. The constructs have phosphodiester linkages unless underlined. Underlined nucleosides have phosphorthioate linkages.

[0408]

	IC50	Max
SEQ ID No.	siRNA	(nM)	Red
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	1.5	86
12	3′- UUC AUU CCU GGU CUC UGU UU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	0.18	87
85	3′- UUmC AmUUm CCmU GmGUm CUmG UmGUm UUm-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	23.4	66
86	3′- UUmC AmUUm CCmU GmGUm CUmG UmGUm UUm-P-5′
132	5′- AmAGm UAmA GmGAm CCmA GmAGm ACmA AmA -3′	3.8	80
86	3′- UUmC AmUUm CCmU GmGUm CUmG UmGUm UUm-P-5′
132	5′- AmAGm UAmA GmGAm CCmA GmAGm ACmA AmA -3′	92	59
85	3′- UUmC AmUUm CCmU GmGUm CUmG UmGUm UUm-P-5′
133	5′- AAmG UmAAm GGmA CmCAm GAmG AmCAm AA -3′	192	48
87	3′- UUmC AmUUm CCmU GmGUm CUmG UmGUm UUm-P-5′
133	5′- AAmG UmAAm GGmA CmCAm GAmG AmCAm AA -3′	3.4	84
85	3′- UUmC AmUUm CCmU GmGUm CUmG UmGUm UUm-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	3.8	70
134	3′- UmUCm AUmU CmCUm GGmU CmUCm UGmU UmU-P-5′
13	5′- AAG UAA GGA CCA GAG ACA AA -3′	53.2	52
135	3′- UmUCm AUmU CmCUm GGmU CmUCm UGmU UmU-P-5′
133	5′- AAmG UmAAm GGmA CmCAm GAmG AmCAm AA -3′	3.5	82
134	3′- UmUCm AUmU CmCUm GGmU CmUCm UGmU UmU-P-5′
133	5′- AAmG UmAAm GGmA CmCAm GAmG AmCAm AA -3′	n.d.	13
135	3′- UmUCm AUmU CmCUm GGmU CmUCm UGmU UmU-P-5′
132	5′- AmAGm UAmA GmGAm CCmA GmAGm ACmA AmA -3′	n.d.	27
134	3′- UmUCm AUmU CmCUm GGmU CmUCm UGmU UmU-P-5′
132	5′- AmAGm UAmA GmGAm CCmA GmAGm ACmA AmA -3′	n.d.	32
135	3′- UmUCm AUmU CmCUm GGmU CmUCm UGmU UmU-P-5′