US 8,494,641 B2Grant

Implantable neurostimulator with integral hermetic electronic enclosure, circuit substrate, monolithic feed-through, lead assembly and anchoring mechanism

Issue Date:2013-07-23

•22 Claims

•17 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

An implantable medical device is provided for the suppression or prevention of pain, movement disorders, epilepsy, cerebrovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases, sleep disorders, autonomic disorders, abnormal metabolic states, disorders of the muscular system, and neuropsychiatric disorders in a patient. The implantable medical device can be a neurostimulator configured to be implanted on or near a cranial nerve to treat headache or other neurological disorders. One aspect of the implantable medical device is that it includes an electronics enclosure, a substrate integral to the electronics enclosure, and a monolithic feed-through integral to the electronics enclosure and the substrate. In some embodiments, the implantable medical device can include a fixation apparatus for attaching the device to a patient.

Metadata

Assignee

Autonomic Technologies, Inc.

Inventors

Carl Lance Boling
Benjamin David Pless
Ryan Powell
Anthony V. Caparso

Application Information

Application Number:US 12/765,712

Filing Date:2010-04-22

Priority Date:2009-04-22

Art Unit:3766

Classifications

IPC:

A61N1/34

Patent Drawings (17 sheets)

Description

Cross-Reference to Related Applications

[0001] This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/171,749 filed Apr. 22, 2009, titled “STIMULATOR WITH INTEGRAL HERMETIC ELECTRICAL ENCLOSURE, CIRCUIT SUBSTRATE AND MONOLITHIC FEED-THROUGH” and No. 61/177,895 filed May 13, 2009, titled “IMPLANTABLE ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATOR WITH INTEGRAL ANCHORING MECHANISM”. These applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Field of the Invention

[0002] The invention relates generally to a stimulating apparatus used to deliver electrical stimulation to a peripheral, central or autonomic neural structure. More specifically, the current invention relates to a neurostimulator apparatus designed to delivery electrical stimulation to the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) to treat primary headaches, such as migraines, cluster headaches and/or many other neurological disorders, such as atypical facial pain and/or trigeminal neuralgias.

Background of the Invention

[0003] Electrical stimulation of peripheral, central and autonomic neural structures have shown increased interest due to the potential benefits it may provide to individuals suffering from many neurological and behavioral diseases. Many of these therapies today are not well accepted or are considered last in the therapeutic options due to the invasive nature of the therapy even through the efficacy may be quite good. This has created a need for less invasive therapies that are directed toward patient and physician clinical needs.

[0004] Primary headaches are one of the most debilitating ailments that afflict millions of individuals worldwide. The specific pathophysiology of headaches is unknown. Known sources of headache pain consist of trauma, vascular, autoimmune, degenerative, infectious, drug and medication-induced, inflammatory, neoplastic, metabolic-endocrine, iatrogenic, musculoskeletal and myofacial causes. Also, even through the possible underlying cause of the headache pain is identified and treated, the headache pain may persist.

[0005] Currently, the sphenopalatine (pterygopalatine) ganglion (SPG) is a target of manipulation in clinical medicine to treat headaches. The SPG is a large extra cranial parasympathetic ganglion. It consists of parasympathetic neurons that innervate (in part) the middle cerebral and anterior cerebral blood vessels, the facial blood vessels, and the lacrimal glands. A ganglion is a mass of nervous tissue found in some peripheral and autonomic nerves. Ganglia are located on the roots of the spinal nerves and on the roots of the trigeminal nerve. Ganglia are also located on the facial, glossopharyngeal, vagus and vestibulochoclear nerves. The SPG is a complex neural ganglion with multiple connections, including autonomic, sensory and motor. The maxillary branch of the trigeminal nerve and the nerve of the pterygoid canal, also known as the vidian nerve, which is formed by the greater and deep petrosal nerves send neural projections to the SPG. The fine branches from the maxillary nerve (pterygopalatine nerves) form the sensory component of the SPG, and these fibers pass through the SPG and do not synapse. The greater petrosal nerve carries the preganglionic parasympathetic axons from the superior salivary nucleus, which is located in the Pons, to the SPG. These fibers synapse onto the postganglionic neurons within the SPG. The deep petrosal nerve connects the superior cervical sympathetic ganglion to the SPG and carries postganglionic sympathetic axons that again pass through the SPG without any synapses.

[0006] The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG), also called the pterygopalatine ganglion, is located within the pterygopalatine fossa. The pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) is bounded anteriorly by the maxilla, posteriorly by the medial plate of the pterygoid process and greater wing of the sphenoid process, medially by the palatine bone, and superiorly by the body of the sphenoid process. Its lateral border is the pterygomaxillary fissure (PMF), which opens to the infratemporal fossa.

[0007] Treatment of the SPG is mostly performed in attempted treatments of severe headaches, such as cluster headaches or chronic migraines. Various clinical approaches have been used for over 100 years to modulate the function of the SPG to treat headaches. These procedures vary from least invasive (e.g. transnasal anesthetic blocks) to much more invasive (e.g. surgical ganglionectomy) as well as procedures such as surgical anesthetic injections, ablations, gamma knife and cryogenic surgery. Most of these procedures have very good short term efficacy outcomes (days to months), however these results are usually temporary and the headache pain returns. A chronically implanted neurostimulator apparatus designed to deliver electrical stimulation to the SPG may provide much better long term efficacy in these patients. This application details the design of a neurostimulator for this purpose.

Summary of the Invention

[0008] In some embodiments, an implantable medical device configured for delivery of electrical stimulation to the Sphenopalatine Ganglion (SPG) is provided, comprising an electronics enclosure, a substrate integral to the electronics enclosure, and a monolithic feed-through integral to the electronics enclosure and the substrate.

[0009] In some embodiments, the device further comprises a fixation apparatus integral to the electronics enclosure. The fixation apparatus can comprise at least one preformed hole configured to accept a bone screw. In some embodiments, the fixation apparatus is malleable and configured to be formed around the zygomaticomaxillary buttress.

[0010] In some embodiments, the electronics enclosure comprises an ASIC, an inductive coil, and a diode array.

[0011] In some embodiments, the implantable medical device is sized and configured for implantation into the pterygopalatine fossa. In other embodiments, the implantable medical device is sized and configured for implantation on the posterior maxilla.

[0012] In one embodiment, the device further comprises a stimulation lead coupled to the electronics enclosure. The stimulation lead can be constructed to an angle off an axis of the electronics enclosure. In some embodiments, the angle is approximately 0 to 60 degrees. In other embodiments, the angle is approximately 30 degrees.

[0013] In one embodiment, the implantable medical device is configured to lay flat against the posterior maxilla, and the stimulation lead is angled so as to maintain contact with the posterior maxilla as it extends to the pterygopalatine fossa.

[0014] In another embodiment, the stimulation lead is sized and configured to pass through a lateral opening of the pterygopalatine fossa. In some embodiments, a diameter of the stimulation lead is approximately 2-12 mm.

[0015] In one embodiment, the device can further comprise at least one electrode disposed on the stimulation lead. The device can further comprise at least one electrode wire coupling the at least one electrode to the electronics enclosure.

[0016] In some embodiments, the device further comprises a platinum/iridium tubing configured to connect the at least one electrode wire to the monolithic feed-through. In some embodiments, the platinum/iridium tubing comprises at least one witness hole.

[0017] In another embodiment, the device comprises a thin-film flex circuit configured to connect the at least one electrode wire to the monolithic feed-through. In another embodiment, a protrusion feature is disposed on the monolithic feed-through.

[0018] Some embodiments of the device further comprise an inductive coil configured to receive power and communication from an external controller at a depth of approximately 1-3 cm.

[0019] In some embodiments, the electronics enclosure comprises an ASIC printed on the electronics enclosure. Another embodiment further comprises at least one annular ring coupled to the electronics enclosure and configured to receive exposed ends of the monolithic feed-through.

[0020] Another embodiment of the device further comprises a stiffening mechanism configured to increase the linear stiffness of the stimulation lead. In some embodiments, the stiffening mechanism comprises a malleable wire. In other embodiments, the stiffening mechanism comprises a coiled wire. In yet another embodiment, the stiffening mechanism comprises a tapered supporting wire.

[0021] An implantable stimulator configured for delivery of electrical stimulation to a nerve is provided, comprising a housing, an electronics enclosure disposed on or in the housing, and a stimulation lead coupled to the electronics enclosure, the stimulation lead including a malleable wire configured give the stimulation lead rigidity to penetrate tissue and malleability to conform to a target anatomy.

[0022] In some embodiments, the stimulator comprises an attachment plate coupled to the housing, the attachment plate configured to accept a bone screw for attachment to bone.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0023] FIG. 1 is a lateral view the neurostimulator in communication with the anatomy;

[0024] FIG. 2 is an isometric view of the neurostimulator;

[0025] FIGS. 3a-3b are top and side section views of the neurostimulator;

[0026] FIG. 4 is a transparent view illustrating the electrode wire interconnects;

[0027] FIG. 5 is a transparent view illustrating an electrode flex circuit interconnect;

[0028] FIG. 6 is an isometric view of a feed-through interconnect embodiment;

[0029] FIG. 7 is an exploded view of the neurostimulator's electronics enclosure;

[0030] FIG. 8 is an exploded view of a electronics enclosure embodiment;

[0031] FIG. 9 is an isometric view of the electronics enclosure embodiment;

[0032] FIG. 10 is a top down view of the neurostimulator's electronics and enclosure;

[0033] FIG. 11 is an isometric view of a feed-through interconnect embodiment;

[0034] FIG. 12 illustrates embodiments of the lead cross-sections;

[0035] FIG. 13 illustrates axial cross-sectional insets of lead embodiments;

[0036] FIG. 14 is an isometric view of an embodiment of a bendable lead;

[0037] FIG. 15 is an isometric view of an embodiment of a bendable lead;

[0038] FIG. 16 is an isometric view of an embodiment of a bendable lead.

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0039] Referring to FIG. 1, a neurostimulator 100 is shown within the intended anatomy for the treatment of primary headaches and other neurological disorders. The neurostimulator of this embodiment comprises of a stimulator body 200a, an integral stimulation lead 200b, and an integral fixation apparatus 200c. The neurostimulator 100 can be implanted such that the stimulator body 200b is positioned medial to the zygoma 205 on the posterior maxilla 206 within the buccal fat pad of the cheek, and the integral fixation apparatus 200c is anchored to the zygomaticomaxillary buttress 203, such as by using standard craniomaxillofacial bone screws, for example. The integral stimulation lead 200c can be placed within the pterygopalatine fossa 202, or more specifically, in very close proximity to the sphenopalatine ganglion 204.

[0040] FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of an implantable neurostimulator 200. In this embodiment, the neurostimulator 200 comprises of a stimulator body 200a, an integral stimulation lead 200b, which includes one or more stimulating electrodes 201, and an integral fixation apparatus 200c. The neurostimulator 200 of this embodiment can be an inductively powered device having the necessary micro-electronics to store programmable stimulation parameters, deliver electrical stimulation per the programmed parameters and to allow bi-directional telemetry to enable communication with an external controller. An external transmitter (not shown) provides powers to and communications with the implanted neurostimulator.

[0041] The neurostimulator's micro-electronics can be housed in the stimulator body 200a, a hermetic enclosure that protects the micro-electronics from fluid ingress when implanted within the body. The stimulator body can further include an electronics enclosure, a micro-electronics assembly, a monolithic feed-through assembly, and a lead interconnect assembly, and the stimulator body can be molded with a protective outer layer. In some embodiments the dimensions of the stimulator body are 8 mm wide, 4 mm thick, and 14 mm long.

[0042] The neurostimulator is sized and configured to be implanted on the posterior maxilla, so the neurostimulator thickness is limited by the available free space between the posterior maxilla and the coronoid process of the mandible. The average distance between the posterior maxilla and the coronoid process, measured from 79 patients using computed tomography, was 13±3 mm with a range of 6-24 mm (unpublished work). Thus, in some embodiments the thickness of the neurostimulator can range from 1 to 10 mm. The width and length of the neurostimulator are also limited by the surrounding anatomy, but in some embodiments the width and length are such that the neurostimulator maintains physical contact with the posterior maxilla. Thus, the neurostimulation width can range from 1-20 mm, and the length can range from 1-25 mm.

[0043] Electrical stimulation can be carried from the micro-electronics to one or more of the stimulating electrodes 201 through the stimulation lead 200b. The stimulation lead can be connected to the stimulator body through a series of feed-through assemblies. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, the stimulator body 200a and a portion of the stimulating lead 200b are shown with a biocompatible outer layer 202, created using a reaction injection molding (RIM) process, to protect the feed-through assemblies, provide strain relief to the stimulation lead and create an isodiametric neurostimulator. The neurostimulator is isodiametric because the size is maintained or decreases from the most proximal portion of the stimulator body to the most distal portion of the stimulating lead. In addition, the configuration of the outer layer does not contain any sharp corners or edges. This allows the neurostimulator to be implanted and explanted without grabbing or tearing of surrounding tissue. In some embodiments, the outer protective layer is created from biocompatible urethane and silicone co-polymer. The protective layer can be up to 1 mm thick, however in some embodiments the protective layer can be 0.1 to 2 mm thick. In other embodiments, different encapsulations methods and materials may be used, including but not limited to, potting, injection molding, casting, conformal coating, or adhering a compliant, semi-compliant, or rigid silicone rubber, epoxy, thermo-set or thermoplastic polymers or combination of any of the described methods and materials around the electronic assembly, lead interconnect, and lead assembly.

[0044] Also referring to FIG. 2, the integral fixation apparatus 200c can include a biocompatible mini-plate with one or more preformed holes extending off the body of the neurostimulator. The preformed holes can be designed to accept a standard bone screw. For example, the preformed holes can be approximately 1.9 mm in diameter and be sized to accept a standard bone screw with a diameter between 1.5-1.8 mm. The preformed holes can also be designed with a ninety-degree chamfer that allows the head of the standard bone screw to recess into the mini-plate and reside flush with the outboard face of mini-plate. In one embodiment the mini-plate is made from titanium (grade 2), which provides both good mechanical fatigue resistance and good flexibility. However, in other embodiments, the mini-plate can be made from other materials such as: commercially pure titanium such as grades 1, 3, or 4 and alloys such as grade 5 or 23; stainless steels such as 304 or 316; other biocompatible metals; and biocompatible plastics such as PEEK, nylon, or polypropylene.

[0045] Additionally, as shown in FIG. 2 the one or more preformed holes are set in a linear configuration off the proximal end of the stimulator body to increase the flexibility of the mini-plate. In the intended target anatomy, the mini-plate can be anchored to the thick dense bone of the zygomatic process of the maxilla, generally referred to the zygomaticomaxillary buttress. When the stimulator body is positioned on the posterior maxilla, the mini-plate must be formed around the buttress without adversely moving or dislodging the stimulator body and the stimulation lead. Thus, the mini-plate must be malleable so that it can be formed around the buttress as well as resistant to flex fatigue from repeat bending. In one embodiment, in which the mini-plate is made from titanium (grade 2), the center-to-center distance between each of the preformed holes can be 6 mm, and the width of the beam between each preformed hole can be 1.3 mm. In this embodiment, the mini-plate provides the proper amount of malleability and flex resistance needed to form the mini-plate around the buttress and to allow for long term reliability for the chronic implantable neurostimulator. Also, the second moment of area across the mini-plate is designed to be constant, which facilitates uniform bending and typically creates a larger more uniform arch. The larger arch that is formed from bending of the mini-plate helps to resist stress concentrations and promotes matching of the surface of the mini-plate to the underlying anatomical bone features. In other embodiments, the center-to-center distance between each of the preformed holes can be between 3-10 mm and the width of the beam between each preformed hole can be 0.5 to 3 mm.

[0046] Additionally, in another embodiment, the arrangement of the preformed holes on the mini-plate can be configured into a Y configuration (a single mini-plate extending off the stimulator body with two tails extending out like a Y), a T configuration (a single mini-plate formed into a T), an L configuration (a single mini-plate formed into an L) or an X configuration (a single mini-plate formed into a X, with one leg of the X attached to the stimulator body). In any of these configurations, each of the mini-plates can contain one or more preformed holes and include the same features described above. In additional embodiments, the neurostimulator can include one or more mini-plates projecting off the stimulator body, including but not limited to a mini-plate extending off the opposing end of the stimulator body from the stimulating lead, and one or more mini-plates extending off the two other adjacent sides of the neurostimulator.

[0047] FIG. 2 also illustrates the stimulating lead 200b of neurostimulator 200. In this embodiment, the stimulating lead comprises of one or more stimulation electrodes 201 and a corresponding number of connecting lead wires for each of the stimulating electrodes. Each connecting lead wire connects to a feed-through on the stimulating body. The connecting wires provide a conduit to deliver electrical stimulation pulses between the micro-electronics and the stimulating electrodes. In one embodiment, the stimulation lead projects from the distal face of the stimulator body constructed to an angle of 30 degrees off the stimulator axis. In this embodiment, the inboard planer side of the neurostimulator body is configured to lay flat against and in interment communication with the posterior maxilla, which also coincides with the stimulator surface from which the integral fixation apparatus 200c extends. The angle of the stimulating lead projecting off the stimulator body allows the lead to maintain contact with the posterior maxilla as it courses from the stimulator body to the pterygopalatine fossa and reduces any stress on the stimulating lead by reducing the lead curvature. In some embodiments, the degree of the angle between the stimulator body and stimulating lead can range from between approximately 0 to 60 degrees. In yet other embodiments the stimulating lead may contain multiple compound angles with the neurostimulator, the angles may be on or off axis with the stimulator body.

[0048] In the embodiment of FIG. 2, the stimulating lead includes seven cylindrical stimulating electrodes 201 that can be configured to provide either cathodic or anodic stimulation. In this embodiment the stimulating lead comprises at least 5 stimulating cathodic electrodes, or working electrodes. The working electrodes are configured to be implanted in very close proximity to the SPG within the pterygopalatine fossa and to be used for delivering the stimulation pulses from the micro-electronics. In some embodiments, the two most proximal electrodes to the stimulator body 200a can be electronically coupled to create a larger reference or return electrode. This reference electrode can be configured as an anode and positioned on the stimulating lead such that it is the farthest electrode from the SPG.

[0049] The length and spacing of the electrodes are configured to optimize stimulation of the SPG. The average height and width of the SPG has been found to be 3.28 mm, range 2-6 mm and 1.76 mm, range 1-3 mm respectively. In some embodiments, the spacing distance between any two adjacent stimulation electrodes is no greater than 1.0 mm and each electrode is 1.5 mm in length. The electrode length and the spacing assures that at least one electrode maintains communication with the SPG. In other embodiments the electrode spacing can range from 0.3-4 mm, and the length of each electrode can range from 0.4 to 4 mm. In one embodiment, the stimulating lead and hence each electrode, is 1 mm in diameter. The diameter of the stimulating lead can be designed such that the lead passes through the lateral opening the pterygopalatine fossa, called the pterygopalatine fissure, which has been reported to be between 2-12 mm wide. In other embodiment, the diameter of the lead can range from 0.5 to 3 mm. Each stimulation electrode has a thickness of 0.1 mm; a minimum thickness of 0.05 mm is needed prevent damage during manufacturing and implantation. The stimulation electrodes can be made from 90/10 platinum/iridium alloy. However, in other embodiments the stimulation electrodes can be made from other biocompatible metallic alloys, including but not limited to platinum, platinum alloys, palladium, palladium alloys, titanium, titanium alloys, various stainless steels, or any other conductive biocompatible metals and biocompatible non-metals such as but not limited to carbon.

[0050] FIG. 3a is an elevated view and FIG. 3b is a sectioned side view of neurostimulator 300, and illustrates the integral design of the neurostimulator. In FIG. 3a, the neurostimulator 300 includes stimulator body 300a, integral stimulating lead 300b, which includes one or more stimulation electrodes 301, and integral fixation apparatus 300c. FIG. 3b shows a sectioned side view of the neurostimulator through the line A-A in FIG. 3a. In this embodiment, the sectioned side view shows the hermetic electronics enclosure within the stimulator body 300a, integral stimulation lead 300b, electrode wire interconnect assembly 305 and the electrode connection wires 303. Also shown in FIG. 3b is the protective (insulation) outer layer 304, which encapsulates the stimulator body and the proximal portion of the stimulation lead. The protective layer also covers the proximal portion of the stimulation lead to provide additional strain relief at the junction between the lead and the stimulator body. This layer is formed by reaction injection molding (RIM) with a biocompatible urethane and silicone co-polymer. Other encapsulations methods and materials may include potting, injection molding, casting, conformal coating, or adhering a compliant, semi-compliant, or rigid silicone rubber, epoxy, thermo set or thermoplastic polymers or combination of any of the described methods and materials around the electronic assembly, lead interconnect, and lead assembly.

[0051] FIG. 4 shows an enlarged detail view of the encapsulated hermetic electronics enclosure 411, feed through assembly and interconnect assembly. The feed-through wires 410 projecting from the upper surface of the hermetic electronic enclosure 411 can be bonded to the enclosure. In some embodiments, the feed-through wires are brazed onto the enclosure using gold braze 412. In other embodiments the feed-through wires can be adhered using a glass fit to the enclosure or otherwise molded or bonded to the enclosure. The feed-through wires can be served upward and then down along the enclosure toward the stimulation lead and connected to the electrode wires 414. In some embodiments, a platinum/iridium tube 413 is used to connect the electrode wires to the feed-through wires. The proximal segment of the platinum/iridium tubing can be crimped onto the feed-through wires and the distal end of the tubing can be crimped to the electrode wires 414. The platinum/iridium tubing includes at least two witness holes 416. These witness holes allow the operator to verify that the wires are appropriately placed prior to applying the crimp. In other embodiments the platinum/iridium tubing can be resistance welded; laser welded, brazed, or otherwise secured using epoxy or other conductive adhesives to the feed-through and electrode wires.

[0052] FIG. 4 also shows the outer protective encapsulation layer (in transparency). In one embodiment, the outer protective layer is a copolymer; a blend of biocompatible urethane and silicone co-polymer uniquely compounded to provide superior adhesion to the substrate while providing a tissue friendly interface. The protective layer can be molded over the stimulator body and a portion of the stimulating lead using a reaction injection molding (RIM) process. The material can be stable, biocompatible, resistant to oxidation and have increased mechanical properties compared to other polyurethanes and silicones. The protective layer is designed to provide electrical isolation between exposed conductors as well as a primary biocompatible interface between the tissue and the implanted device. The use of this material to surround the electrode wire interconnect assembly to the feed-through assembly provides stability and electrical insulation to each interconnection. The material can also be molded onto a proximal portion of the stimulation lead to act as a strain relief.

[0053] FIG. 5 illustrates an alternative embodiment of an electrode wire to feed-through interconnect system similar to the embodiment described above, except that each electrode is connected to the feed-through assembly using an organic thin-film flex circuit 520. The flex circuit can comprise of a polyamide film with printed trace lines made of a conductive material such as gold. In one embodiment, the flex circuit contains at least six trace lines printed on the polyamide film with each trace line corresponding to one electrode. In another embodiment, the polyamide film is expanded near the interconnect assembly, such that the printed trace lines are equally spaced with the feed-through assembly wires. Then each trace line on the polyamide film is extended off the film like a comb with individual fingers, each finger representing on printed trace line. Each trace can then be crimped onto the feed-through assembly wires as described above. The polyamide film can be narrowed once it enters into the stimulating lead assembly. In one embodiment, the narrowed film is no wider than 0.5 mm, such that the film is smaller than the diameter of the lead assembly (e.g., 1.0 mm). In one embodiment, the polyamide film that comprises the flex circuit is 0.1 mm thick, however in other embodiments the flex circuit can be approximately 0.05 to 0.5 mm thick. In other embodiments, the flex circuit can take on the shape needed to facilitate the interconnection between the stimulation electrodes and the feed-through assembly.

[0054] In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 6, the electronics enclosure 610 and integral feed-through wires 611 are shown and include an additional protrusion feature 612 in the feed-through assemblies. The protrusion feature is used to increase the surface distance between each of the monolithic feed-through wires and provide a larger surface area for increased adhesion of the copolymer. Once the outer protective layer is molded onto the electronics enclosure it provides stability and protects the electrical connections between the feed-through wires and the electrode wires. If fluid ingress occurs, coupled with the copolymer delaminating, the increased surface distance (i.e. the electrical path) between electrodes will help prevent electrical shorting. In one embodiment, the protrusion features extend above the surface of the electronics enclosure by approximately 0.25 mm. In other embodiments, the protrusions can extend between 0.1 to 0.5 mm above the enclosure. Also shown in FIG. 6, is a staggered configuration of the feed-through assemblies. Due to size constraints on the electronic enclosure, the feed-through assemblies may not be able to be arranged in a linear fashion without unintended electrical shorting between two adjacent feed-through assemblies. By staggering the feed-through assemblies, an increased number of feed-through wires can be used and the distance between adjacent feed-through assemblies could be increased, reducing the risk of electrical shorting.

[0055] FIG. 7 is an isometric exploded view of a hermetic electronics enclosure of a neurostimulator. In this embodiment, the hermetic enclosure comprises a substrate and monolithic feed-through 721, a bezel 723 and a lid 724. The hermetic enclosure houses the micro-electronic assembly, an inductive coil 726 and a ferrite core 727. In one embodiment, the substrate is manufactured from stabilized zirconium oxide and the feed-through wires are gold brazed into place and are manufactured from platinum-iridium (80/20). In other embodiments, the substrate and integral monolithic feed-through assembly 721 can be manufactured from one of many ceramic materials, including, but not limited to aluminum oxide, transparent polycrystalline aluminum oxide, stabilized zirconium oxide, aluminum nitride, and silicon nitride. The substrate and monolithic feed-through assembly can be produced using a variety of manufacturing methods including but not limited to post sintering machining, green form pressing and sintering, and injection molding and sintering.

[0056] In one embodiment, the bezel 723 and the lid 724 can be manufactured using a high resistance, biocompatible metal such as commercially pure or alloyed titanium. In other embodiments, the bezel can be made out of but not limited to other materials including corrosion resistant stainless steels, refractory's such as aluminum oxide, transparent polycrystalline aluminum oxide, stabilized zirconium oxide, aluminum nitride, and silicon nitride or glass fit.

[0057] In one embodiment, the bezel 723 is brazed at the location to the mating edge of the ceramic substrate and monolithic feed-through assembly using pure gold braze. This braze provides a gas tight seal between the bezel and the ceramic substrate of the electronics enclosure. The bezel also exhibits recessed self-alignment nesting features suitable to receive and accommodate the lid 724, which is welded to the bezel providing another gas tight seal at location between the bezel and the lid. The bezel is brazed on the ceramic substrate prior to populating the electrodes within the substrate. By doing so, the titanium lid can be welded onto the titanium bezel after the electronics assembly has been populated within the substrate. The welding between the bezel and the lid can be a low temperature process, which does not affect the electronics within the enclosure. However, if the bezel is not used, the lid would need to be brazed onto the substrate, which is a high temperature process. The high temperature process would adversely affect the electronics. The gold braze between the substrate and the bezel can be done prior to populating the electronics within the substrate allowing a lower temperature weld to be done between the lid and the bezel after populating the electronics.

[0058] Referring to FIG. 7, the electronics enclosure can house a micro-electronics assembly, an inductive coil 726 and a ferrite core 727. In this embodiment the inductive coil is connected and bonded into the electronics enclosure and used to inductively receive power and provide bi-directional communication with an external controller (not shown). The inductive coil can be configured such that when implanted within the neurostimulator at a depth of 1-3 cm, the inductive coil can still receive power and communicate with the external controller. The inductive coil can be part of an RC (resistor-capacitor) circuit designed to resonate between 120 and 130 kHz. In one embodiment, the inductive coil resonates via 2.7 to 3.3 nF capacitor. The coil can be 200 turns of 41 gauge bondable solid core magnetic wire and wound into a rectangular orientation, 11.47 mm long by 5.47 mm wide, for example. In one embodiment, the thickness of the coil is 1.5 mm. In other embodiments, the coil is configured such that it includes a step on the inner surface. This step allows for the coil to sit flat on a specific surface of the ceramic substrate and clear the protrusions of the feed-through wires on another portion of the inside surface of the ceramic substrate. The step in the coil can increase the number of turns that can be allowed to fit into the electronics enclosure. The increased number of turns allows for greater distance in which the coil can be externally powered, thus allowing for a greater distance over which bi-directional communication can occur. Additionally, in other embodiments, the length, width and thickness of the coil can be adjusted to fit into the electronics enclosure and configured such to optimize the power transfer and communication distances. The ferrite core can be bonded into the top side of the inductive coil and used to align the magnetic flux to optimize energy transfer. The micro-electronics, inductive coil and ferrite core are all contained within the electronics enclosure and hermetically sealed using a titanium lid.

[0059] The hermetic electronics enclosure also supports an integral fixation apparatus 728. The fixation apparatus as described above can be fixed to the enclosure, and in one embodiment the fixation apparatus is laser welded to the enclosure. In other embodiment the fixation apparatus can be bonded using standard biocompatible adhesives, or otherwise mechanical attached, e.g. swage or press fit to the hermetic enclosure. Additionally, the fixation apparatus includes an additional routing feature 729 located on the distal side of the stimulator body. In one embodiment, the routing feature is made from the same titanium as the fixation mini-plate and is configured to curve around the electrode wires as they pass from the stimulating lead to the stimulator body. The electrode wires are guided through the routing feature on the fixation apparatus, where they can be organized and crimped to the feed-through wires on the electronics enclosure.

[0060] In an alternative embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 8, an isometric exploded view of the hermetic electronics enclosure 810 including the integral fixation apparatus which includes the bezel 811 and a lid 812 is shown without the stimulation lead assembly and protective outer layer. In this embodiment, the fixation apparatus is integral to the bezel. The integral bezel and fixation apparatus are then brazed onto the ceramic electronics enclosure.

[0061] In this embodiment, the braze bezel 811 also exhibits a recessed self-alignment nesting features suitable to receive and accommodate the lid 812 which can be welded to the braze bezel providing a gas tight seal between the braze bezel and the lid, as shown in FIG. 8.

[0062] FIG. 9 illustrates one embodiment of a three-dimensional micro-electronics assembly. In this embodiment the micro-electronics assembly comprises of an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) 730, a diode array 731, a diode array interposer 732, an ASIC interposer, and discrete components including but not limited to a resonating capacitor 734 and a smoothing capacitor. In one embodiment, the diode array is soldered or conductive adhesive bonded onto an organic or ceramic interposer. The diode interposer provides a conductive patterned electrical circuit between the arranged diodes. In one embodiment, the diode interposer is then adhesive bonded to the upper surface of the ASIC. The diode array rectifies the alternating current coming from the RC circuit which is then used to power the ASIC.

[0063] As shown in FIG. 9, the AISC with the bonded diode array interposer can be adhesive bonded onto a second organic or ceramic interposer. In one embodiment the ASIC is wire-boned using gold ball bonding or wedge bonding between exposed circuit pads on the interposer and exposed pads on the ASIC. The ASIC interposer provides a patterned electrical circuit between discrete components and the ASIC including but not limited to a resonating capacitor and smoothing capacitors. The discrete components are soldered or conductive adhesive bonded to the ASIC interposer. In one embodiment, the micro-electronic assembly, including the ASIC 730, diode array 731, diode array interposer 732, ASIC interposer, resonating capacitor 734 and smoothing capacitor, is bonded or adhered to the lower surface of the brazed hermetic ceramic electronics enclosure, or alternatively, is printed directly into the brazed hermetic ceramic electronics enclosure.

[0064] In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 9, the ASIC interposer contains one or more apertures 736, which are metalized annular rings, to receive the exposed ends of the conductive feed-through pins. The electrical connection between the ASIC interposer and the feed-through wire is done using conductive epoxy. In other embodiments the electrical connections between the ASIC interposer and the feed-through wires can be done using traditional wire-bonding techniques, or soldering the metalized annular rings around the aperture to the feed-through pins.

[0065] In other embodiments, as illustrated in FIG. 10, the ASIC interposer described above is metalized directly onto the inner bottom surface of the ceramic substrate. The metalized patterned electrical circuit is metalized using thick film, or a sputtered metal deposition to impose the circuit pattern on the substrate, in which to affix electronic components. Metalizing the substrate facilitates communication between the assembled components and the outside environment at the location where the metalized substrate interfaces with the monolithic feed-through using wires brazed into the enclosure. In one embodiment, the metalized thick film or sputter is a few angstroms thick, and more specifically a 2000 angstrom thick layer of platinum and gold is laid directly on the ceramic substrate to create the patterned electrical circuit.

[0066] In other embodiments, as illustrated in FIG. 11, the position of the monolithic feed-through assemblies 911 on the ceramic substrate 910 can protrude through the distal wall of the ceramic substrate. In this embodiment, the substrate can be manufactured from stabilized zirconium oxide and the feed-through pins can be gold brazed into place and can be manufactured from platinum-iridium (80/20). In various other embodiments the integral substrate and monolithic feed-through assembly may be manufactured from one of many ceramic materials, including, but not limited to aluminum oxide, transparent polycrystalline aluminum oxide, aluminum nitride, and silicon nitride. Also the electronics enclosure, integral substrate and monolithic feed-through assembly can be produced using a variety of manufacturing methods including but not limited to post sintering machining, green form pressing and sintering, and injection molding and sintering. The pins may also be manufactured from platinum or other platinum alloys, palladium, titanium, or stainless steel.

[0067] FIG. 12 illustrates a side view of one embodiment of the neurostimulator 1200, which can comprise of a stimulator body 1200a, a stimulation lead 1200b, which contains one or more stimulation electrodes 1201, and an integral fixation apparatus 1200c. FIG. 12 also shows two embodiments of the cross-section through the diameter of the stimulation lead 1200b. In one embodiment, the cross-section view AA in FIG. 12, the electrode wires or conductors 1202 that are electrically connected to the feed-through assemblies on the electronic enclosure for each electrode are discrete, independently insulated conductor wires serviced within individual lumens 1203 in the integral stimulation lead 1200b. In one embodiment the stimulation lead is manufactured using a multi-lumen extruded copolymer. The copolymer used in the extruded multi-lumen lead is very similar to the copolymer used in the outer protective (insulating) layer that covers the stimulator body and a portion of the stimulation lead. In this embodiment, the copolymer used has an increased hardness compared to the outer protective layer copolymer. In one embodiment, the conductive electrode wires can be made of stranded platinum-iridium (90/10) wire with a diameter of 0.1 mm. In other embodiments the conductive wire can be made from but not limited to stranded or finely bundled cable assemblies or in alternate embodiments a solid wire. The conductive electrode wires can be manufactured from but not limited to platinum, platinum-iridium alloy, MP35N or a variation of MP35N including a DFT, drawn and filled tubing, stainless steel, gold, or other biocompatible conductor materials. The center lumen in the cross-section can includes a malleable wire segment made from platinum-iridium (90/10) with a diameter up to 0.4 mm. The malleable wire segment in the center lumen, in one embodiment, can be made from but not limited to platinum, platinum-iridium alloy, MP35N or a variation of MP35N including a DFT. The additional of the malleable wire or other stiffening mechanism to the center lumen, in one embodiment, provides the stimulation lead assembly with added mechanical properties, such as, increasing the linear stiffness of the lead and providing increased flex fatigue properties to the entire lead assembly. The increase in the linear stiffness of the stimulation lead is needed to ease the implantation of the neurostimulator. For example, the stimulation lead having a malleable wire can be configured to have the rigidity to penetrate and dissect through blunt tissue, but remain malleable enough to be bent into a shape to conform to the target anatomy.

[0068] In one embodiment, the neurostimulator is configured to be implanted within the pterygopalatine fossa, a deep structure located behind the base of the nose, and just anterior the skull base. As described in U.S. Patent Application No. 61/145,122 to Papay, which is incorporated herein by reference, the intended implantation of the neurostimulation into the pterygopalatine fossa is through a trans-oral approach using a custom implantation tool to aid in the placement of the neurostimulator. An increased linear stiffness of the stimulation lead will greatly add to the ease of the implantation. Additionally, as referenced the Papay application, the intended implant location of the stimulator body is on the posterior maxilla with the stimulation lead extending to the pterygopalatine fossa along the posterior maxilla. In this location, the stimulator body and the stimulator lead will be subject to compressive forces due to the motion of the surrounding anatomy from movements of the lower jaw. Thus increasing the flex fatigue resistance of the stimulation lead will increase the life time of the chronically implanted neurostimulator.

[0069] Referring still to FIG. 12, in other embodiments, the center lumen of the stimulation lead may not be used to support a wire segment. In one embodiment, a supporting wire 1202 may be floating within the lumen or directly contacting the stimulation lead over-molding encapsulation, as shown in the cross-sectional view AA “ALT” on the right in FIG. 12. This view is in reference to the thin film flex circuit embodiment described above. In this embodiment, the flex circuit 1205 is suspended within the encapsulation of the stimulation lead. Also as discussed above the flex circuit contains one or more printed conductive traces 1206 that electrically connect each electrode to the feed-through assembly on the electronics enclosure.

[0070] FIG. 13 shows additional alternate embodiment of a neurostimulator in side view. FIGS. 13a, b, and c also show three sectional details of the neurostimulator illustrating alternative embodiments that include methods to facilitate mechanical manipulation and resistance to fatigue in-vivo. FIG. 13a shows one embodiment in which a coiled wire 1301 may be added to the proximal portion of the stimulation lead as it mates with the stimulator body. In this embodiment the coiled wire can be manufactured from a straight or partially coiled wire made of a highly malleable biocompatible alloy such as palladium, platinum, or annealed platinum. In this embodiment the coiled wire is configured such that the stimulation lead has optimal resistance to fatigue in vivo. To optimize the flex resistance of the inserted coil within the stimulation lead the following parameters can be adjusted; the diameter of the wire, the outer diameter of the coil, pitch of the coil, and the number of turns in the coil. In one embodiment, the coil was manufactured using a palladium wire with a diameter of 0.25 mm, and manufactured into a coil with 5 turns, a coil pitch of 1.0 mm, and an outer diameter 1.0 mm. The coil is then suspended within the over-mold material 1302 of the lead as described above. In this embodiment the electrode wires 1303 that electrically connect the electrodes to the feed-through interconnects transverse through the center of the coiled wire segment.

[0071] In alternate embodiments, as shown in FIG. 13c, the supporting wire 1304 can be straight and be manufactured from more rigid materials such as titanium, stainless steel, or nitinol. In other embodiment, a combination between the more rigid straight section of the wire and a coiled wire can be employed. In this embodiment the coiled/straight material can be manufactured using the one wire or using discrete wires for each segment of the supporting wire. In this embodiment, the supporting wire can be manufactured from highly malleable biocompatible alloy such as palladium, platinum, or annealed platinum allow or from more rigid materials such as annealed titanium, stainless steel, nitinol, or any combination thereof.

[0072] In yet another alternative embodiment, as shown in FIG. 13b, a tapered supporting wire 1305 can be used. In this embodiment, a tapered wire with a heaver diametric cross-section proximally and tapering to a finer cross-section distally is used to provide support to the stimulation lead. In one embodiment, the tapered wire may be manufactured from either highly malleable biocompatible alloy such as palladium, platinum, or annealed platinum allow. In alternate embodiments the wire can be manufactured from more rigid materials such as annealed titanium, stainless steel, or nitinol. In one embodiment, the tapered supporting wire can start at a diameter of 0.5 mm and taper to a diameter 0.1 mm at the distal portion of the wire. In other embodiments, the tapered wire can start with a diameter between 0.5 to 0.8 mm and taper to a diameter of 0.4 to 0.05 mm. The tapered support wire can provide increased mechanical stability and improved flex resistance at the junction between the stimulation lead and the stimulator body, as well as provide increased bending at the distal tip of the stimulation lead over a straight non-tapered supporting wire.

[0073] FIGS. 14, 15 and 16 illustrate the ability of the integral stimulation lead, in one or more embodiments to be bent and/or shaped into any direction and the ability to retain the directional manipulation made to the stimulation lead during implant. FIGS. 14 and 15 depict the ability of the distal stimulation lead to be bent in any direction to accommodate the needed implantation of the neurostimulator. FIG. 16 depicts the ability of the entire stimulation lead to be manipulated into any angle compared to the stimulator body and retain that position during implantation.

[0074] It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and sub-combinations of the various features described, as well as variations and modifications thereof that are not in the prior art, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. An implantable medical device configured for delivery of electrical stimulation to the Sphenopalatine Ganglion (SPG), comprising:

an electronics enclosure;

a substrate integral to the electronics enclosure;

a monolithic feed-through integral to the electronics enclosure and the substrate;

a stimulation lead having at least one electrode coupled to the electronics enclosure with at least one electrode wire; and

a platinum/iridium tubing having at least one witness hole, the platinum/iridium tubing being configured to connect the at least one electrode wire to the monolithic feed-through.

2. The implantable medical device of claim 1 further comprising a fixation apparatus integral to the electronics enclosure.

3. The implantable medical device of claim 2 wherein the fixation apparatus comprises at least one preformed hole configured to accept a bone screw.

4. The implantable medical device of claim 2 wherein the fixation apparatus is malleable and configured to be formed around the zygomaticomaxillary buttress.

5. The implantable medical device of claim 1 wherein the electronics enclosure comprises an ASIC, an inductive coil, and a diode array.

6. The implantable medical device of claim 1 wherein the implantable medical device is sized and configured for implantation into the pterygopalatine fossa.

7. The implantable medical device of claim 1 wherein the implantable medical device is sized and configured for implantation on the posterior maxilla.

8. The implantable medical device of claim 1 wherein the stimulation lead is constructed to an angle off an axis of the electronics enclosure.

9. The implantable medical device of claim 8 wherein the angle is approximately 0 to 60 degrees.

10. The implantable medical device of claim 8 wherein the angle is approximately 30 degrees.

11. The implantable medical device of claim 8 wherein the implantable medical device is configured to lay flat against the posterior maxilla, and the stimulation lead is angled so as to maintain contact with the posterior maxilla as it extends to the pterygopalatine fossa.

12. The implantable medical device of claim 8 further comprising a stiffening mechanism configured to increase the linear stiffness of the stimulation lead.

13. The implantable medical device of claim 12 wherein the stiffening mechanism comprises a malleable wire.

14. The implantable medical device of claim 12 wherein the stiffening mechanism comprises a coiled wire.

15. The implantable medical device of claim 12 wherein the stiffening mechanism comprises a tapered supporting wire.

16. The implantable medical device of claim 1 wherein the stimulation lead is sized and configured to pass through a lateral opening of the pterygopalatine fossa.

17. The implantable medical device of claim 16 wherein a diameter of the stimulation lead is approximately 2-12 mm.

18. The implantable medical device of claim 1 further comprising a thin-film flex circuit configured to connect the at least one electrode wire to the monolithic feed-through.

19. The implantable medical device of claim 1 further comprising a protrusion feature disposed on the monolithic feed-through.

20. The implantable medical device of claim 1 further comprising an inductive coil configured to receive power and communication from an external controller at a depth of approximately 1-3 cm.

21. The implantable medical device of claim 1 wherein the electronics enclosure comprises an ASIC printed on the electronics enclosure.

22. The implantable medical device of claim 21 further comprising at least one annular ring coupled to the electronics enclosure and configured to receive exposed ends of the monolithic feed-through.

Patent Citations (316)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US2123980(A)	1938-07-01	Warwick	Applicant
US2182071(A)	1939-12-01	Crossley	Applicant
US3357434(A)	1967-12-01	Abell	Applicant
US3746004(A)	1973-07-01	Jankelson	Applicant
US3862321(A)	1975-01-01	Adams et al.	Applicant
US3914283(A)	1975-10-01	Okamoto et al.	Applicant
US3923060(A)	1975-12-01	Ellinwood, Jr.	Applicant
US3925469(A)	1975-12-01	Adams et al.	Applicant
US4073917(A)	1978-02-01	Sandberg et al.	Applicant
US4102344(A)	1978-07-01	Conway et al.	Applicant
US4117160(A)	1978-09-01	Molnar et al.	Applicant
US4147804(A)	1979-04-01	Diamond et al.	Applicant
US4217349(A)	1980-08-01	Katsube et al.	Applicant
US4298603(A)	1981-11-01	Chang et al.	Applicant
US4305402(A)	1981-12-01	Katims	Applicant
US4352820(A)	1982-10-01	Scurlock et al.	Applicant
US4379161(A)	1983-04-01	Thominet et al.	Applicant
US4397845(A)	1983-08-01	Allen	Applicant
US4441210(A)	1984-04-01	Hochmair et al.	Applicant
US4495174(A)	1985-01-01	Allcock et al.	Applicant
US4519400(A)	1985-05-01	Brenman et al.	Applicant
US4529601(A)	1985-07-01	Broberg et al.	Applicant
US4550733(A)	1985-11-01	Liss et al.	Applicant
US4551453(A)	1985-11-01	Marsili	Applicant
US4565200(A)	1986-01-01	Cosman	Applicant
US4592359(A)	1986-06-01	Galbraith	Applicant
US4622219(A)	1986-11-01	Haynes	Applicant
US4627438(A)	1986-12-01	Liss et al.	Applicant
US4632940(A)	1986-12-01	Chiarino et al.	Applicant
US4646744(A)	1987-03-01	Capel	Applicant
US4692147(A)	1987-09-01	Duggan	Applicant
US4695576(A)	1987-09-01	af Ekenstam et al.	Applicant
US4718423(A)	1988-01-01	Willis et al.	Applicant
US4727145(A)	1988-02-01	Press	Applicant
US4776349(A)	1988-10-01	Nashef et al.	Applicant
US4784142(A)	1988-11-01	Liss et al.	Applicant
US4830008(A)	1989-05-01	Meer	Applicant
US4833149(A)	1989-05-01	Press	Applicant
US4856526(A)	1989-08-01	Liss et al.	Applicant
US4870086(A)	1989-09-01	Sandberg	Applicant
US4871475(A)	1989-10-01	Lubowitz et al.	Applicant
US4886493(A)	1989-12-01	Yee	Applicant
US4920979(A)	1990-05-01	Bullara	Applicant
US4937078(A)	1990-06-01	Mezei et al.	Applicant
US4976711(A)	1990-12-01	Parins et al.	Applicant
US5038781(A)	1991-08-01	Lynch	Applicant
US5085868(A)	1992-02-01	Mattsson et al.	Applicant
US5178156(A)	1993-01-01	Takishima et al.	Applicant
US5193539(A)	1993-03-01	Schulman et al.	Applicant
US5199428(A)	1993-04-01	Obel et al.	Applicant
US5215086(A)	1993-06-01	Terry, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5227165(A)	1993-07-01	Domb et al.	Applicant
US5234957(A)	1993-08-01	Mantelle	Applicant
US5255691(A)	1993-10-01	Otten	Applicant
US5259387(A)	1993-11-01	dePinto	Applicant
US5314458(A)	1994-05-01	Najafi	Applicant
US5318592(A)	1994-06-01	Schaldach	Applicant
US5330515(A)	1994-07-01	Rutecki et al.	Applicant
US5335657(A)	1994-08-01	Terry, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5344438(A)	1994-09-01	Testerman et al.	Applicant
US5360805(A)	1994-11-01	Ask et al.	Applicant
US5387587(A)	1995-02-01	Hausler et al.	Applicant
US5411546(A)	1995-05-01	Bowald et al.	Applicant
US5420151(A)	1995-05-01	Hammarberg et al.	Applicant
US5428006(A)	1995-06-01	Bechgaard et al.	Applicant
US5433739(A)	1995-07-01	Sluijter et al.	Applicant
US5458626(A)	1995-10-01	Krause	Applicant
US5458631(A)	1995-10-01	Xavier	Applicant
US5490520(A)	1996-02-01	Schaefer et al.	Applicant
US5514131(A)	1996-05-01	Edwards et al.	Applicant
US5540730(A)	1996-07-01	Terry, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5540734(A)	1996-07-01	Zabara	Applicant
US5545219(A)	1996-08-01	Kuzma	Applicant
US5558622(A)	1996-09-01	Greenberg	Applicant
US5569166(A)	1996-10-01	Stone	Applicant
US5578061(A)	1996-11-01	Stroetmann et al.	Applicant
US5591216(A)	1997-01-01	Testerman et al.	Applicant
US5640764(A)	1997-06-01	Strojnik	Examiner
US5645570(A)	1997-07-01	Corbucci	Applicant
US5653734(A)	1997-08-01	Alt	Applicant
US5658318(A)	1997-08-01	Stroetmann et al.	Applicant
US5660837(A)	1997-08-01	Lundquist	Applicant
US5676955(A)	1997-10-01	Ansmann et al.	Applicant
US5700282(A)	1997-12-01	Zabara	Applicant
US5707400(A)	1998-01-01	Terry, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5711316(A)	1998-01-01	Elsberry et al.	Applicant
US5713922(A)	1998-02-01	King	Applicant
US5735817(A)	1998-04-01	Shantha	Applicant
US5756520(A)	1998-05-01	Ask et al.	Applicant
US5766605(A)	1998-06-01	Sanders et al.	Applicant
US5824027(A)	1998-10-01	Hoffer et al.	Applicant
US5843021(A)	1998-12-01	Edwards et al.	Applicant
US5861014(A)	1999-01-01	Familoni	Applicant
US5865843(A)	1999-02-01	Baudino	Applicant
US5938688(A)	1999-08-01	Schiff	Applicant
US6001088(A)	1999-12-01	Roberts et al.	Applicant
US6006134(A)	1999-12-01	Hill et al.	Applicant
US6016449(A)	2000-01-01	Fischell et al.	Applicant
US6026326(A)	2000-02-01	Bardy	Applicant
US6058331(A)	2000-05-01	King	Applicant
US6073048(A)	2000-06-01	Kieval et al.	Applicant
US6093145(A)	2000-07-01	Vom Berg et al.	Applicant
US6094598(A)	2000-07-01	Elsberry et al.	Applicant
US6104957(A)	2000-08-01	Alo et al.	Applicant
US6128538(A)	2000-10-01	Fischell et al.	Applicant
US6132384(A)	2000-10-01	Christopherson et al.	Applicant
US6134474(A)	2000-10-01	Fischell et al.	Applicant
US6141590(A)	2000-10-01	Renirie et al.	Applicant
US6146380(A)	2000-11-01	Racz et al.	Applicant
US6161044(A)	2000-12-01	Silverstone	Applicant
US6161048(A)	2000-12-01	Sluijter et al.	Applicant
US6178349(B1)	2001-01-01	Kieval	Applicant
US6205359(B1)	2001-03-01	Boveja	Applicant
US6246912(B1)	2001-06-01	Sluijter et al.	Applicant
US6251126(B1)	2001-06-01	Ottenhoff et al.	Applicant
US6259952(B1)	2001-07-01	Sluijter et al.	Applicant
US6262377(B1)	2001-07-01	Nielsen et al.	Applicant
US6269270(B1)	2001-07-01	Boveja	Applicant
US6292695(B1)	2001-09-01	Webster, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US6308105(B1)	2001-10-01	Duysens et al.	Applicant
US6353792(B1)	2002-03-01	Murthy	Applicant
US6356786(B1)	2002-03-01	Rezai et al.	Applicant
US6356787(B1)	2002-03-01	Rezai et al.	Applicant
US6356788(B2)	2002-03-01	Boveja	Applicant
US6366814(B1)	2002-04-01	Boveja et al.	Applicant
US6400982(B2)	2002-06-01	Sweeney et al.	Applicant
US6405079(B1)	2002-06-01	Ansarinia	Applicant
US6432986(B2)	2002-08-01	Levin	Applicant
US6438423(B1)	2002-08-01	Rezai et al.	Applicant
US6456786(B1)	2002-09-01	Uchida et al.	Applicant
US6458157(B1)	2002-10-01	Suaning	Applicant
US6491940(B1)	2002-12-01	Levin	Applicant
US6511500(B1)	2003-01-01	Rahme	Applicant
US6526318(B1)	2003-02-01	Ansarinia	Applicant
US6564096(B2)	2003-05-01	Mest	Applicant
US6564102(B1)	2003-05-01	Boveja	Applicant
US6610713(B2)	2003-08-01	Tracey	Applicant
US6615081(B1)	2003-09-01	Boveja	Applicant
US6633779(B1)	2003-10-01	Schuler	Applicant
US6647296(B2)	2003-11-01	Fischell et al.	Applicant
US6665562(B2)	2003-12-01	Gluckman et al.	Applicant
US6668191(B1)	2003-12-01	Boveja	Applicant
US6735475(B1)	2004-05-01	Whitehurst et al.	Applicant
US6760626(B1)	2004-07-01	Boveja	Applicant
US6788975(B1)	2004-09-01	Whitehurst et al.	Applicant
USRE38654(E)	2004-11-01	Hill et al.	Applicant
US6819956(B2)	2004-11-01	DiLorenzo	Applicant
US6853858(B2)	2005-02-01	Shalev	Applicant
US6885888(B2)	2005-04-01	Rezai	Applicant
US6978180(B2)	2005-12-01	Tadlock	Applicant
US7003352(B1)	2006-02-01	Whitehurst	Applicant
US7027860(B2)	2006-04-01	Bruninga et al.	Applicant
US7047078(B2)	2006-05-01	Boggs, II et al.	Applicant
US7076307(B2)	2006-07-01	Boveja et al.	Applicant
US7113033(B2)	2006-09-01	Barnett	Applicant
US7117033(B2)	2006-10-01	Shalev et al.	Applicant
US7120489(B2)	2006-10-01	Shalev et al.	Applicant
US7149574(B2)	2006-12-01	Yun et al.	Applicant
US7167751(B1)	2007-01-01	Whitehurst et al.	Applicant
US7191012(B2)	2007-03-01	Boveja et al.	Applicant
US7203548(B2)	2007-04-01	Whitehurst et al.	Applicant
US7209787(B2)	2007-04-01	DiLorenzo	Applicant
US7277758(B2)	2007-10-01	DiLorenzo	Applicant
US7285118(B1)	2007-10-01	Lozano	Applicant
US7286879(B2)	2007-10-01	Wallace	Applicant
US7292890(B2)	2007-11-01	Whitehurst et al.	Applicant
US7340298(B1)	2008-03-01	Barbut	Applicant
US7349743(B2)	2008-03-01	Tadlock	Applicant
US7363076(B2)	2008-04-01	Yun et al.	Applicant
US7369897(B2)	2008-05-01	Boveja et al.	Applicant
US7403821(B2)	2008-07-01	Haugland et al.	Applicant
US7477945(B2)	2009-01-01	Rezai et al.	Applicant
US7494458(B2)	2009-02-01	Fischell et al.	Applicant
US7532938(B2)	2009-05-01	Machado et al.	Applicant
US7561919(B2)	2009-07-01	Shalev et al.	Applicant
US7623924(B2)	2009-11-01	Narciso, Jr.	Applicant
US7640057(B2)	2009-12-01	Libbus et al.	Applicant
US7689276(B2)	2010-03-01	Dobak	Applicant
US7763034(B2)	2010-07-01	Siegel et al.	Applicant
US7848816(B1)	2010-12-01	Wenzel et al.	Applicant
US2002/0026222(A1)	2002-02-01	Schauerte et al.	Applicant
US2002/0073334(A1)	2002-06-01	Sherman et al.	Applicant
US2002/0107553(A1)	2002-08-01	Hill et al.	Applicant
US2002/0169365(A1)	2002-11-01	Nakada et al.	Applicant
US2003/0004549(A1)	2003-01-01	Hill et al.	Applicant
US2003/0018367(A1)	2003-01-01	DiLorenzo	Applicant
US2003/0018368(A1)	2003-01-01	Ansarinia	Applicant
US2003/0060857(A1)	2003-03-01	Perrson et al.	Applicant
US2003/0065374(A1)	2003-04-01	Honeck	Applicant
US2003/0100924(A1)	2003-05-01	Foreman et al.	Applicant
US2003/0133877(A1)	2003-07-01	Levin	Applicant
US2003/0144709(A1)	2003-07-01	Zabara et al.	Applicant
US2003/0176898(A1)	2003-09-01	Gross et al.	Applicant
US2003/0181951(A1)	2003-09-01	Cates	Applicant
US2003/0181958(A1)	2003-09-01	Dobak, III	Applicant
US2003/0181959(A1)	2003-09-01	Dobak, III	Applicant
US2003/0212440(A1)	2003-11-01	Boveja	Applicant
US2003/0216792(A1)	2003-11-01	Levin et al.	Applicant
US2004/0015204(A1)	2004-01-01	Whitehurst et al.	Applicant
US2004/0019364(A1)	2004-01-01	Kieval et al.	Applicant
US2004/0049235(A1)	2004-03-01	Deno et al.	Applicant
US2004/0172084(A1)	2004-09-01	Knudson et al.	Applicant
US2004/0210295(A1)	2004-10-01	Brushey	Applicant
US2004/0230255(A1)	2004-11-01	Dobak, III	Applicant
US2004/0236381(A1)	2004-11-01	Dinsmoor et al.	Applicant
US2005/0065562(A1)	2005-03-01	Rezai	Applicant
US2005/0065573(A1)	2005-03-01	Rezai	Applicant
US2005/0075701(A1)	2005-04-01	Shafer	Applicant
US2005/0075702(A1)	2005-04-01	Shafer	Applicant
US2005/0102006(A1)	2005-05-01	Whitehurst et al.	Applicant
US2005/0143787(A1)	2005-06-01	Boveja et al.	Applicant
US2005/0149156(A1)	2005-07-01	Libbus et al.	Applicant
US2005/0153885(A1)	2005-07-01	Yun et al.	Applicant
US2005/0154419(A1)	2005-07-01	Whitehurst et al.	Applicant
US2005/0154426(A1)	2005-07-01	Boveja et al.	Applicant
US2005/0159790(A1)	2005-07-01	Shalev	Applicant
US2005/0197675(A1)	2005-09-01	David et al.	Applicant
US2005/0209654(A1)	2005-09-01	Boveja et al.	Applicant
US2005/0216070(A1)	2005-09-01	Boveja et al.	Applicant
US2005/0234523(A1)	2005-10-01	Levin et al.	Applicant
US2005/0281751(A1)	2005-12-01	Levin	Applicant
US2006/0004423(A1)	2006-01-01	Boveja et al.	Applicant
US2006/0020299(A1)	2006-01-01	Shalev	Applicant
US2006/0064140(A1)	2006-03-01	Whitehurst et al.	Applicant
US2006/0074450(A1)	2006-04-01	Boveja et al.	Applicant
US2006/0074463(A1)	2006-04-01	Seeberger et al.	Applicant
US2006/0079945(A1)	2006-04-01	Libbus	Applicant
US2006/0085046(A1)	2006-04-01	Rezai	Applicant
US2006/0095088(A1)	2006-05-01	De Ridder	Applicant
US2006/0100667(A1)	2006-05-01	Machado et al.	Applicant
US2006/0100668(A1)	2006-05-01	Ben-David et al.	Applicant
US2006/0100671(A1)	2006-05-01	De Ridder	Applicant
US2006/0111754(A1)	2006-05-01	Rezai	Applicant
US2006/0116721(A1)	2006-06-01	Yun et al.	Applicant
US2006/0149337(A1)	2006-07-01	John	Applicant
US2006/0167497(A1)	2006-07-01	Armstrong et al.	Applicant
US2006/0173495(A1)	2006-08-01	Armstrong et al.	Applicant
US2006/0184211(A1)	2006-08-01	Gaunt et al.	Applicant
US2006/0195169(A1)	2006-08-01	Gross	Applicant
US2006/0206165(A1)	2006-09-01	Jaax et al.	Applicant
US2006/0235484(A1)	2006-10-01	Jaax et al.	Applicant
US2006/0287678(A1)	2006-12-01	Shafer	Applicant
US2006/0293723(A1)	2006-12-01	Whitehurst et al.	Applicant
US2007/0021801(A1)	2007-01-01	Heruth et al.	Applicant
US2007/0021802(A1)	2007-01-01	Heruth et al.	Applicant
US2007/0027483(A1)	2007-02-01	Maschino et al.	Applicant
US2007/0027484(A1)	2007-02-01	Guzman et al.	Applicant
US2007/0027486(A1)	2007-02-01	Armstrong	Applicant
US2007/0027498(A1)	2007-02-01	Maschino et al.	Applicant
US2007/0039625(A1)	2007-02-01	Heruth et al.	Applicant
US2007/0049988(A1)	2007-03-01	Carbunaru et al.	Applicant
US2007/0066997(A1)	2007-03-01	He et al.	Applicant
US2007/0067004(A1)	2007-03-01	Boveja et al.	Applicant
US2007/0083245(A1)	2007-04-01	Lamensdorf et al.	Applicant
US2007/0100411(A1)	2007-05-01	Bonde	Applicant
US2007/0106143(A1)	2007-05-01	Flaherty	Applicant
US2007/0112404(A1)	2007-05-01	Mann et al.	Applicant
US2007/0156177(A1)	2007-07-01	Harel et al.	Applicant
US2007/0156179(A1)	2007-07-01	Karashurov	Applicant
US2007/0167984(A1)	2007-07-01	Kieval et al.	Applicant
US2007/0203521(A1)	2007-08-01	Dobak et al.	Applicant
US2007/0233193(A1)	2007-10-01	Craig	Applicant
US2007/0250119(A1)	2007-10-01	Tyler et al.	Applicant
US2007/0250145(A1)	2007-10-01	Kraus et al.	Applicant
US2007/0255368(A1)	2007-11-01	Bonde et al.	Applicant
US2007/0255369(A1)	2007-11-01	Bonde et al.	Applicant
US2007/0293906(A1)	2007-12-01	Cowan et al.	Applicant
US2008/0027346(A1)	2008-01-01	Litt et al.	Applicant
US2008/0033509(A1)	2008-02-01	Shalev et al.	Applicant
US2008/0046053(A1)	2008-02-01	Wagner et al.	Applicant
US2008/0071318(A1)	2008-03-01	Brooke et al.	Applicant
US2008/0086182(A1)	2008-04-01	Ben-David et al.	Applicant
US2008/0103547(A1)	2008-05-01	Okun et al.	Applicant
US2008/0103569(A1)	2008-05-01	Gerber	Applicant
US2008/0132933(A1)	2008-06-01	Gerber	Applicant
US2008/0132981(A1)	2008-06-01	Gerber	Applicant
US2008/0132982(A1)	2008-06-01	Gerber	Applicant
US2008/0140000(A1)	2008-06-01	Shuros et al.	Applicant
US2008/0161877(A1)	2008-07-01	Kirby et al.	Applicant
US2008/0161894(A1)	2008-07-01	Ben-David et al.	Applicant
US2008/0183237(A1)	2008-07-01	Errico et al.	Applicant
US2008/0183246(A1)	2008-07-01	Patel et al.	Applicant
US2008/0183253(A1)	2008-07-01	Bly	Applicant
US2008/0262566(A1)	2008-10-01	Jaax	Applicant
US2008/0269716(A1)	2008-10-01	Bonde et al.	Applicant
US2009/0012577(A1)	2009-01-01	Rezai et al.	Applicant
US2009/0036949(A1)	2009-02-01	Kokones et al.	Applicant
US2009/0105783(A1)	2009-04-01	Solberg et al.	Applicant
US2009/0118780(A1)	2009-05-01	DiLorenzo	Applicant
US2009/0216287(A1)	2009-08-01	Ansarinia	Applicant
US2009/0254147(A1)	2009-10-01	Ansarinia	Applicant
US2009/0264956(A1)	2009-10-01	Rise et al.	Applicant
US2009/0276005(A1)	2009-11-01	Pless	Examiner
US2009/0276025(A1)	2009-11-01	Burnes et al.	Applicant
US2009/0312817(A1)	2009-12-01	Hogle et al.	Applicant
US2009/0320845(A1)	2009-12-01	Fishman et al.	Applicant
US2010/0137940(A1)	2010-06-01	Levin	Applicant
US2010/0185258(A1)	2010-07-01	Papay	Applicant
US2010/0268306(A1)	2010-10-01	Maniak et al.	Applicant
US2011/0029037(A1)	2011-02-01	Rezai et al.	Applicant
US2012/0209286(A1)	2012-08-01	Papay et al.	Applicant
EP69427(A2)	1983-01-01		Applicant
EP970813(A2)	2000-01-01		Applicant
EP754060(B1)	2003-03-01		Applicant
RU2108817(C1)	1996-04-01		Applicant
WO85/00599(A1)	1985-02-01		Applicant
WO92/07605(A1)	1992-05-01		Applicant
WO95/21821(A1)	1994-02-01		Applicant
WO97/02000(A1)	1997-01-01		Applicant
WO97/15548(A1)	1997-05-01		Applicant
WO97/23467(A1)	1997-07-01		Applicant
WO97/38675(A1)	1997-10-01		Applicant
WO1/85094(A2)	2001-11-01		Applicant
WO1/97905(A1)	2001-12-01		Applicant
WO3/082123(A2)	2003-10-01		Applicant
WO2005/105202(A1)	2005-11-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (115)

Alstadhaug, K.B.; Migraine and the hypothalamus; Cephalalgia (Blackwell Publishing Ltd.); pp. 1-9; 2009.Applicant
Ardell et al.; “Differential sympathetic regulation of automatic, conductile, and contractile tissue in dog heart;” American Physiological Society; pp. H1050-H1059; Jun. 6, 1988.Applicant
Babe, “Treatment of sphenopalatine ganglion neuralgia”, An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am, vol. 16(5): 463-74 (1989) (abstract).Applicant
Barre, “Cocaine as an abortive agent in cluster headache”, Headache, vol. 22: 69-73 (1982).Applicant
Benumof et al.; Pulmonary artery catheterization; In Clinical Procedures in Anesthesia and Intensive Care; JB Lippincott Company; pp. 405-441; 1992.Applicant
Berger et al., “Does topical anesthesia of the sphenopalatine ganglion with cocaine or lidocaine relieve low back pain?”, Anesth Analg, vol. 35: 87-108 (1925).Applicant
Boysen et al.; Parasympathetic tonic dilatory influences on cerebral vessels; Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical; vol. 147; pp. 101-104; 2009.Applicant
Brooksby et al.; Dynamic changes in splanchnic blood flow and blood volume in dogs during activation of sympathetic nerves; Circulation Research; vol. 29; pp. 227-238; 1971.Applicant
Brooksby et al; Release of blood from the splanchnic circulation in dogs; Circulation Research; vol. 31; pp. 105-118; 1972.Applicant
Browne et al., “Concurrent cervical and craniofacial pain” Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 86(6): 633-640 (Dec. 1998).Applicant
Carneiro et al.; Blood reservoir function of dog spleen, liver and intestine; American Journal of Physiology; vol. 232; No. 1; pp. H67-H72; 1977.Applicant
Carroll et al., “Motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: a preliminary study of 10 cases” Pain 84:431-437 (2000).Applicant
Cepero et al., “Long-term results of sphenopalatine ganglioneurectomy for facial pain”, Am J Otolaryngol, 8(3): 171-4 (1987).Applicant
Cheatham et al.; Shock: An overview, surgical critical care service; Department of Surgical Education; Orlando Regional Medical Center; 5th ed.; pp. 1-40; 2003.Applicant
Cohen et al.; Sphenopalatine ganglion block for postdural puncture headache; Anaesthesia; vol. 64; pp. 574-575; 2009.Applicant
Cook, “Cryosurgery of headache”, Res Clin Stud Headache, vol. 5: 86-101 (1978) (abstract).Applicant
Cooper et al.; Neural effects on sinus rate and atrioventricular conduction produced by electrical stimulation from a transvenous electrode catheter in the canine right pulmonary artery; Circulation Research; vol. 46; pp. 48-57; 1980.Applicant
Cutrer et al., “Effects of PNU-109,291, a selective 5H-T1D receptor agonist, on electrically induced dural plasma extravasation and capsaicin-evoked c-fos immunoreactivity within trigeminal nucleus caudalis” Neuropharm 38:1043-1053 (1999).Applicant
Delepine et al., “Plasma protein extravasation induced in the rat dura mater by stimulation of the parasympathetic sphenopalatine ganglion”, Exp Neurology, vol. 147: 389-400 (1997).Applicant
Devoghel, “Cluster headache and sphenopalatine block”, Acta Anaesthesio Belg, vol. 32(1), pp. 101-107 (1981).Applicant
Feindel et al., “The tentorial nerves and localization of intracranial pain in man” Neurology 555-563 (1955).Applicant
Ferrante et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of myofascial pain of the head, neck, and shoulders”, Reg Anesth Pain, vol. 23(1): 30-6 (1998) (abstract).Applicant
Frisardi et al., “Electric versus magnetic transcranial stimulation of the trigeminal system in healthy subjects. Clinical applications in gnathology.”, J Oral Rehabil, 24(12): 920-8 (1986) (abstract).Applicant
Goadsby et al., “Differential effects of low dose CP122,288 and eletriptan on Fos expression due to stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus in cat” Pain 82:15-22 (1999).Applicant
Goadsby et al., “Stimulation of an intracranial trigeminally-innervated structure selectively increases cerebrial blood flow” Brain Research 751:247-252 (1997).Applicant
Goadsby et al., “Substance P blockade with the potent and centrally acting antagonist GR205171 does not effect central trigeminal activity with superior sagittal sinus stimuation” Neuroscience 86(1):337-343 (1998).Applicant
Goadsby et al., “The trigeminovascular system and migraine: studies characterizing cerebrovascular and neuropeptide changes seen in humans and cats” Ann Neurol 33:48-56 (1993).Applicant
Goadsby et al., Effect of stimulation of trigeminal ganglion on regional cerebral blood flow in cats; Am J. Physiol.; vol. 22; pp. R270-R274; 1987.Applicant
Goadsby, “Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation increases regional blood flow independent of glucose utilization in the cat”, Brain Research, vol. 506: 145-8 (1990).Applicant
Gregoire, “Cluster headaches”, Can Nurse, vol. 87(9): 33-5 (1991) (abstract).Applicant
Hardebo, Jan-Erik; Activation of pain fibers to the internal carotid artery intracranially may cause the pain and local signs of reduced sympathetic and enhanced parasympathetic activity in cluster headache; Headache; 31; pp. 314-320; May 1991.Applicant
Hardebo, Jan-Erik; On pain mechanisms in cluster headache; Headache; 31; pp. 91-106; 1991.Applicant
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society, “Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain”, Cephalalgia, Supp & 0:13, 19-24 and 35-38 (1988).Applicant
Heusch et al.; Adrenergic mechanisms in myocardial ischemia; Supp. to Basic Research in Cardiology; vol. 85; 1990.Applicant
Hillier; Monitored anesthesia care; Clinical Anesthesia; Ch. 47; pp. 1239-1254; 2001.Applicant
Hoskin et al., “Fos expression in the trigeminocervical complex of the cat after stimulation of superior sagittal sinus is reduced by L-NAME” Neuroscience Letters 266:173-176 (1999).Applicant
Hudson; Basic principles of clinical pharmacology; Clinical Anesthesia; Ch. 11; pp. 239-260; 2001.Applicant
Ibarra, Eduardo; Neuromodulación del Ganglio Esfenopalation para Aliviar los Sintomas del la Cefalea en Raciomos; Boletin El Dolor; vol. 46, No. 16; pp. 12-18; 2007 (with English translation).Applicant
Iliff et al.; Epoxyeicosanoids as mediators of neurogenic vasodilation in cerebral vessels; Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; vol. 296; pp. 1352-1363; Mar. 20, 2009.Applicant
Janes et al.; Anatomy of human extrinsic cardiac nerves and ganglia; American Journal of Cardiology; vol. 57; pp. 299-309; 1986.Applicant
Janzen et al., “Sphenopalatine blocks in the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndrome”, Laryngoscope, vol. 107(10): 1420-2 (1997).Applicant
Kittrelle et al., “Cluster headache. Local anesthetic abortive agents”, Arch Neurol, vol. 42(5): 496-8 (May 1985).Applicant
Kosaras et al.; Sensory innervation of the calvarial bones of the mouse; The Journal of Comparative Neurology (John Wiley & Sons); 48 pgs.; 2009.Applicant
Kudrow et al., “Rapid and sustained relief of migraine attacks with intranasal lidocaine: preliminary findings”, Headache, vol. 25: 79-82 (1995).Applicant
Kudrow, “Natural history of cluster headaches—part 1 outcome of drop-out patients”, Headache, vol. 22: 203-6 (1982).Applicant
Kushiku et al.; Upregulation of Immunoreactive Angiotensin II Release and Angiotensinogen mRNA Expression by High-Frequency Preganglionic Stimulation at the Canine Cardiac Sympathetic Ganglia; Circ Res.; 88; pp. 110-116; 2001.Applicant
Lambert et al.; Comparative effects of stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion and the superior sagittal sinus on cerebral blood flow and evoked potentials in the cat; Brain Research; vol. 453; pp. 143-149; 1988.Applicant
Lebovits et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion block: clinical use in the pain management clinic”, Clin J Pain, vol. 6(2): 131-6 (1990).Applicant
Levine et al.; Central venous and pulmonary artery catheter monitoring; Critical Care Monitoring from Pre-Hospital to the ICU; pp. 145-158.Applicant
Maizels et al., “Intranasal lidocaine for treatment of migraine”, JAMA, vol. 276 (4): 319-21 (1996).Applicant
Manahan et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion block relieves symptoms of trigeminal neuralgia: a case report”, Nebr Med J, vol. 81(9): 306-9 (1996) (abstract).Applicant
Matsumoto et al.; Effective sites by sympathetic beta-andrenergic and vagal nonadrenergic inhibitory stimulation in constricted airways; Am Rev Respir Dis; vol. 132; pp. 1113-1117; Nov. 1985.Applicant
Matthey et al.; Bedside catheterization of the pulmonary artery: risks compared with benefits; In Clinical Procedures in Anesthesia and Intensive Care; JB Lippincott Company; vol. 109; pp. 826-834; 1988.Applicant
Meyer et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglionectomy for cluster headache”, Arch Otolaryngol, vol. 92(5): 475-84 (Nov. 1970).Applicant
Meyerson et al.; Alleviation of Atypical trigeminal pain by stimulation of the gasserian ganglion via an implanted electrode; Acta Neurochirurgica; supp. 30; pp. 303-309; 1980.Applicant
Moskowitz et al., “Basic mechanisms in vascular headache” Headache 8 (4):801-815 (Nov. 1990).Applicant
Moskowitz, Michael; Cluster headache: evidence for a pathophysiologic focus in the superior pericarotid cavernous sinus plexus; Headache; vol. 28; pp. 584-586; 1988.Applicant
Moskowitz; Neurogenic inflammation in the pathophysiology and treatment of migraine; Neurology; vol. 43; suppl. 3; pp. S16-S20; 1993.Applicant
Murphy et al.; Human cardiac nerve stimulation; The Annals of Thoracic Surgery; vol. 54; p. 502; 1992.Applicant
Narouze et al.; Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache; Headache; vol. 49; pp. 571-577; Apr. 2009.Applicant
Narouze et al.; Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the acute treatment of intractable migraine; American Academy of Pain Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts; pp. 226 (Abstract No. 157); 2009.Applicant
Nguyen et al., “Chronic motor cortex stimulation in the treatment of central and neuropathic pain. Correlations between clinical, electrophysiological and anatomical data” Pain 82:245-251 (1999).Applicant
Onofrio et al., “Surgical treatment of chronic cluster headache”, Mayo Clin Proc, vol. 61(7), pp. 537-544 (1986).Applicant
Peterson et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion block: a safe and easy method for the management of orofacial pain”, Cranio, vol. 13(3): 177-81 (1995) (abstract).Applicant
Phebus et al., “The non-peptide NK-1 receptor antagonist LY303870 inhibits neurogenic dural inflammation in guinea pigs” Life Sciences 60(18):1553-1561 (1997).Applicant
Pollock et al., “Stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of sphenopalatine neuralgia”, J Neurosurg, vol. 87(3): 450-3 (1997).Applicant
Reder et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion block in treatment of acute and chronic pain”, Diagnosis and treatment of chronic pain, John Wright, publisher, 97-108 (1982).Applicant
Reuter et al.; Experimental models of migraine; Funct Neurol; suppl. 15; pp. 9-18; 2000.Applicant
Ruskin, “Contributions to the study of the sphenopalatine ganglion”, Laryngoscope, vol. 35(2): 87-108 (1925).Applicant
Ruskin; Sphenopalatine (nasal) gaglion: remote effects including “psychosomatic” symptons, rage reaction, pain, and spasm; Arch Phys Med Rehabil; vol. 60; pp. 353-359; Aug. 1979.Applicant
Ryan et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion neuralgia and cluster headache: comparisons, contrasts, and treatment”, Headache, vol. 17: 7-8 (1977).Applicant
Saade et al., “Patient-administered sphenopalatine ganglion block”, Reg Anesth, vol. 21(1): 68-70 (1996) (abstract).Applicant
Sanders et al., “Efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in 66 patients suffering from cluster headache: a 12- to 70- month follow-up evaluation”, J Neurosurg., vol. 87(6), pp. 876-880 (Dec. 1997).Applicant
Scherlag et al.; Endovascular stimulation within the left pulmonary artery to induce slowing of heart rate and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; Cardiovascular Research; vol. 54; pp. 470-475; 2002.Applicant
Schulz et al., “Localization of epileptic auras induced on stimulation by subdural electrodes” Epilepsia 38(12) 1321-1329 (1997).Applicant
Scott et al.; Trigger point injections for chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review; Pain Medicine; vol. 10; No. 1; pp. 54-69; 2009.Applicant
Seylaz et al., “Effect of stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion on cortical blood flow in the rat”, J Cerebr Blood Flow and Metab, vol. 8: 875-8 (1988).Applicant
Shuster et al., “Treatment of vasomotor rhinitis, trigeminal neuralgia and Sluder's syndrome by irradiation of the sphenopalatine ganglion with helium-neon lasers”, Vestin Otorinolaringol, vol. 4: 35-40 (1988).Applicant
Sluder, “The syndrome of sphenopalatine ganglion neuralgia”, Am J Medicament Sci, vol. 111: 868-878 (1910).Applicant
Sluder; The anatomical and clinical relations of the sphenopalatine (Meckel's) ganglion to the nose and its accessory sinuses; NY Med. J.; vol. 90; pp. 293-298; Aug. 1909.Applicant
Steude; Percutaneous electro stimulation of the trigeminal nerve in patients with atypical trigeminal neuralgia; Neurochirurgia; vol. 21; pp. 66-69; 1978.Applicant
Storer et al., “Microiontophoretic application of serotonin (5HT) 1B/1D agonists inhibits trigeminal cell firing in the cat” Brain 120:2171-2177 (1997).Applicant
Strassman et al., “Sensitization of meningeal sensory neurons and the origin of headaches” Nature 384:560-563 (Dec. 1996).Applicant
Suzuki et al., “Selective electrical stimulation of postganglionic cerebrovascular parasympathetic nerve fibers originating from the sphenopalatine ganglion enhances cortical blood flow in the rat”, J Cerebr Blood Flow and Metab, vol. 10: 383-391 (1990).Applicant
Suzuki et al.; Trigeminal fibre collaterals storing substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide ; Neuroscience; vol. 30; No. 3; pp. 595-604; 1989.Applicant
Taub et al., “Chronic electrical stimulation of the gasserian ganglion for the relief of pain in a series of 34 patients”, J Neurosurg, vol. 86: 197-202 (1997).Applicant
Thalamic Stimulation and Trigeminal Neuralgia; Neuroscience Pathways (Publication of The Cleveland Clinic Foundation); Spring 1998 newsletter; pp. 1-2.Applicant
Toda et al.; Cerebral blood flow regulation by nitric oxide: recent advances; Pharmacol Rev; vol. 61; No. 1; pp. 62-97; 2009.Applicant
Vitek; Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation: excitation or inhibition; Movement Disorders; vol. 17; supp. 3; pp. S69-S72; 2002.Applicant
Walters et al.; Cerebrovascular projections from the sphenopalatine and otic ganglia to the middle cerebral artery of the cat; Stroke; vol. 17; pp. 488-494; 1986.Applicant
Young, “Electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve root for the treatment of chronic facial pain”, J Neurosurg, vol. 83: 72-78 (1995).Applicant
Zarembinski et al.; Sphenopalatine ganglion block in traumatic trigeminal neuralgia and the outcome to radiosurgical ablation; American Academy of Pain Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts; pp. 200 (abstract No. 102); 2009.Applicant
Witte et al.; Experimental heart failure in rats: effects on cardiovascular circadian rhythms and on myocardial ?-adrenergic signaling; Cardiovasc Res; vol. 47; pp. 350-358; 2000.Applicant
Yee et al.; Circadian variation in the effects of aldosterone blockade on heart rate variability and QT dispersion in congestive heart failure; J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.; vol. 37; pp. 1800-1807; 2001.Applicant
Pless et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,119 entitled “Integrated Delivery and Visualization Tool for a Neuromodulation System,” filed Dec. 29, 2009.Applicant
Fletcher et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/688,524 entitled “Approval Per Use Implanted Neurostimulator,” filed Jan. 15, 2010.Applicant
Wingeier et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/692,444 entitled “Method and Devices for Adrenal Stimulation,” filed Jan. 22, 2010.Applicant
Wingeier et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/791,690 entitled “Methods and Devices for Adrenal Stimulation,” filed Jun. 1, 2010.Applicant
Cooke-Ariel; Circadian variations in cardiovascular function and their relation to the occurrence and timing of cardiac events; Am. J. Heath. Syst. Pharm.; vol. 55; supp. 3; pp. S5-S11; Nov. 15, 1998.Applicant
Giles; Importance of long-acting andiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for congestive heart failure; Am. J. Cardiol.; vol. 70; pp. 98C-101C; Oct. 8, 1992.Applicant
Grossmann; Effects of cardiac glycosides on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in healthy volunteers and patients with heart failure; Eur J Clin Invest; vol. 31; Iss.S2; pp. 26-30; Apr. 2001.Applicant
Gudovsky et al.; Surgical treatment of bronchial asthma; Surgery (Khigurgiia); vol. 7; pp. 14-18; Jul. 2002.Applicant
Karashurov et al.; Evolution of surgical treatment of bronchial asthma; Surgery (Khigurgiia); vol. 11; pp. 57-60; Nov. 1999.Applicant
Kim et al.; Sympathectomy: Open and Thoracoscopic; In: Surgical Management of Pain; Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; RD 595.5.587; Chapter 55; Jan. 2002.Applicant
Mansoor et al.; Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: technique and application in the study of cardiac dysfunction and congestive heart failure; Congest Heart Fail; vol. 7; pp. 319-324; Nov./Dec. 2001.Applicant
Panina et al.; Assessment of autonomic tone over a 24-hour period in patients with congestive heart failure: relation between mean heart rate and measures of heart rate variability; Am. H. J.; vol. 129; pp. 748-753; Apr. 1995.Applicant
Teerlink et al.; Hemodynamic variability and circadian rhythm in rats with heart failure: role of locomotor activity; Am. J. Physiol.; vol. 264; pp. H2111-H2118; Jun. 1993.Applicant
Theodosopoulos et al.; Endoscopic approach to the infratemporal fossa: anatomic study; Neurosurgery; vol. 66; No. 1; pp. 196-203; Jan. 2010.Applicant
Van Horne et al.; Multichannel semiconductor-based electrodes for in vivo electrochemical and electrophysiological studies in rat CNS; Neuroscience Letters; vol. 120; pp. 249-252; Nov. 1990.Applicant
Guo et al.; Treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia with acupuncture at the sphenopalatine ganglion; Journal of traditional chinese medicine; vol. 15(1) pp. 31-33; 1995.Applicant
Karavis, “The neurophysiology of acupuncture: a viewpoint”, Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 15(1): 33-42 (May 1997).Applicant
Gromova et al.; Sinusoidal modulated currents in comprehensive treatment of children with bronchial asthma; Voprosy Kurortologii Fizioterapii, I Lechebnoi Fizicheskoi Kultury; May-Jun.; (3); pp. 45-47; 1981 (w/ English Abstract).Applicant
Karashurov et al.; Radio frequency electrostimulation of the gangliated cord of the sympathetic nerve in patients with bronchial asthma; Surgery (Khigurgiia); vol. 1; pp. 44-46; 2000 (w/ English Abstract).Applicant
Rao et al., “Effectiveness of temporal pattern in the input to a ganglion: Inhibition in the cardiac ganglion of spiny lobsters”, J of Neurobiology, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 233-245 (1969) (abstract).Applicant
Sinkj et al., “Electroneurography”, Encyclopedia of Medical Devices and Instrumentation, Second Edition: pp. 109-132 (2006).Applicant

Abstract