US 8,414,893 B2Grant
Anti-amyloid antibodies and uses thereof
Issue Date:2013-04-09
•20 Claims
•3 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
Compositions for treating neurodegenerative or amyloidogenic disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) are provided. More particularly, anti-amyloid-beta antibodies, compositions containing such antibodies, corresponding nucleic acids, vectors and host cells, and methods of making such antibodies are provided.
Metadata
Assignee
- Amgen Inc.
Inventors
- Anja Leona Biere-Citron
- Frederick W. Jacobsen
- Stephen J. Wood
Application Information
Application Number:US 12/809,563
Filing Date:2008-12-19
Priority Date:2007-12-21
Art Unit:1649
Classifications
IPC:
A61K39/395C07K16/18C12P21/08C07H21/04C12N15/13C12N5/07
Patent Drawings (3 sheets)
Description
[0001] This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2008/013881, having an international filing date of Dec. 19, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/016,167, filed Dec. 21, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
[0002] The instant application contains an ASCII “txt” compliant sequence listing submitted via EFS-WEB on Jun. 18, 2010, which serves as both the computer readable form (CRF) and the paper copy required by 37 C.F.R. Section 1.821(c) and 1.821(e), and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The name of the “txt” file which was created on Dec. 18, 2008, is: A-1388-WO-PCT SeqList-Off of 43034_Prov seq.txt, and is 127 kb in size.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0003] This invention relates to compositions for treating neurodegenerative or amyloidogenic disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), and more particularly, to compositions containing anti-amyloid-beta antibodies.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0004] Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects more than 12 million patients worldwide, accounting for most dementia diagnosed after the age of 60. The disease is clinically characterized by a global decline of cognitive function that progresses slowly and leaves end-stage patients bedridden, incontinent and dependent on custodial care; death occurs, on average, nine years after diagnosis (Davis et al., in Pharmacological Management of Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders, pp. 267-316, 1998). In addition to its direct effects on patients, advanced AD puts a tremendous burden on family caregivers and causes high nursing home costs for society. Age is the major risk factor for AD, and a health care crisis is likely in countries with aging populations if treatments that protect against the disease or delay or stop its progression cannot be introduced within the next decade. The current standard of care for mild to moderate AD includes treatment with acetylcholine-esterase inhibitors to improve cognitive function (Doody, R., Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord., 13:S20-S26, 1999). These drugs are safe, but of limited benefit to most patients.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] The invention relates to specific binding agents, including antibodies, that bind with high affinity to amyloid-β (Aβ) and exhibit amyloid plaque reduction activity. The invention provides such specific binding agents, materials and methods for producing such specific binding agents, and methods of using such specific binding agents.
[0006] In a different aspect, the invention relates to specific binding agents, including antibodies, that exhibit pharmacokinetic parameters associated with a reduction in adverse effects or the incidence of adverse effects. Such pharmacokinetic parameters include: (a) high Cmax or a high initial concentration at about time zero (C0), (b) low initial volume of distribution (V0), or (c) low volume of distribution at steady state (Vss). Specific binding agents that exhibit one, two or all of these pharmacokinetic properties are contemplated as an aspect of the invention.
[0007] Experiments performed in cynomolgus monkeys administered a humanized anti-amyloid antibody 2.1A (containing light chain amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 45 and heavy chain amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 47) at doses of ≦15 mg/kg resulted in an adverse event that appears to be associated with the antibody's pharmacokinetic parameters. When administered to cynomolgus monkeys at a dose of about 4.5 mg/kg, the humanized 2.1A antibody exhibited an initial serum concentration (C0) of about 6.5 μg/mL an initial volume of distribution (V0) of about 700 mL/kg), a volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) of about 2410 mL/kg, and a clearance rate (CL) of greater than about 10 mL/kg/hr. Antibodies with different pharmacokinetic parameters are expected to produce fewer or less severe adverse effects.
[0008] Thus, in one aspect, the invention contemplates the use of specific binding agents characterized by reduced systemic effects and by one or more pharmacokinetic parameters (as measured in cynomolgus monkeys at a dose of about 4.5 mg/kg), including any one, two, three or all of the following:
[0009] (a) at least about [5-fold, 10-fold, 15-fold, 20-fold, 25-fold, 30-fold, 35-fold, or 40-fold] higher C0 (or Cmax) values compared to that obtained with humanized antibody 2.1 A,
[0010] (b) at least about [3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold, 10-fold, 15-fold, 20-fold, 25-fold, or 30-fold] lower V0 values compared to that obtained with humanized antibody 2.1A,
[0011] (c) at least about [3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold, 10-fold, 15-fold, 20-fold, 25-fold, or 30-fold] lower Vss values compared to that obtained with humanized antibody 2.1A,
[0012] (d) at least about [3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold, 10-fold, 15-fold, 20-fold, 25-fold, 30-fold, 35-fold, 40-fold, 45-fold, or 50-fold] lower CL values compared to that obtained with humanized antibody 2.1A.
[0013] In some embodiments, the specific binding agents have higher C0 (or Cmax) and/or a lower V0 values. In other embodiments, the specific binding agents have higher C0 (or Cmax), lower V0 and lower Vss values. In exemplary embodiments, the specific binding agents are antibodies with pharmacokinetic values (as measured in cynomolgus monkeys given a dose of about 4.5 mg/kg) within the following ranges: C0 ranging from about 35 μg/mL to 90 μg/mL, V0 ranging from about 50 mL/kg to 150 mL/kg, and optionally Vss ranging from about 120 mL/kg to 600 mL/kg, and further optionally clearance values (CL) ranging from about 0.3 mL/kg/hr to 2 mL/kg/hr and reduced systemic effects such as vasculitis.
[0014] The specific binding agents, including antibodies, of the present invention can be used in the manufacture of a pharmaceutical composition or medicament. Exemplary embodiments of the invention include a pharmaceutical composition or medicament to treat an amyloidogenic disease, such as, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease or primary systemic amyloidosis, in a human comprising a therapeutically effective amount of an antibody that when administered intravenously to a cynomolgus in a single dose of about 4.5 mg/kg is characterized by an initial concentration value (C0) greater than about 10, about 20, about 30, about 40, about 50, about 60, or about 70 μg/mL, and/or up to 100, 125 or 150 μg/mL, and a sterile pharmaceutically acceptable diluent, carrier or excipient. In some embodiments, the antibody in the pharmaceutical composition may, alternatively, or in addition, be characterized by an initial volume of distribution (V0) value less than about 600, about 500, about 400, about 300, about 200, or about 100 mL/kg. In some embodiments, the antibody in the pharmaceutical composition may, alternatively, or in addition to the preceding characteristics, produce a volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) value less than about 1000, about 900, about 800, about 700, about 600, about 500, about 400, about 300, or about 200 mL/kg.
[0015] In yet another aspect, the invention relates to specific binding agents that preferentially bind to certain forms of amyloid. For example, the invention contemplates specific binding agents that bind with 3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold, 6-fold, 7-fold, 8-fold, 9-fold, 10-fold, 11-fold, 12-fold, 13-fold, 14-fold or 15-fold higher affinity to Aβ42 monomers compared to Aβ40 monomers.
[0016] In one embodiment, the invention provides isolated antibodies that specifically bind to amino acid residues 1-42 of amyloid beta (SEQ ID NO: 43) with a kd of about 1×10−4 s−1 or less as measured by BIAcore, and that comprises at least one amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 5-10, SEQ ID NOs: 15-20, SEQ ID NOs: 25-30, SEQ ID NOs: 35-40, SEQ ID NOs: 56-61, SEQ ID NOs: 66-71, SEQ ID NOs: 76-81, SEQ ID NOs: 86-91, SEQ ID NOs: 96-101, SEQ ID NOs: 106-111, SEQ ID NOs: 116-121, and SEQ ID NOs: 126-131.
[0017] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 5-10. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 2 and/or SEQ ID NO: 4.
[0018] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 15-20. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 12 and/or SEQ ID NO: 14.
[0019] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 25-30. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 22 and/or SEQ ID NO: 24.
[0020] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 35-40. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 32 and/or SEQ ID NO: 34.
[0021] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 56-61. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 53 and/or SEQ ID NO: 55.
[0022] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 66-71. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 63 and/or SEQ ID NO: 65.
[0023] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 76-81. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 73 and/or SEQ ID NO: 75.
[0024] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 86-91. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 83 and/or SEQ ID NO: 85.
[0025] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 96-101. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 93 and/or SEQ ID NO: 95.
[0026] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 106-111. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 103 and/or SEQ ID NO: 105.
[0027] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 116-121. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 113 and/or SEQ ID NO: 115.
[0028] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 126-131. In a related embodiment, the isolated antibody comprises and amino acid sequence at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 123 and/or SEQ ID NO: 125.
[0029] In some embodiments, the isolated antibody comprises a polypeptide comprising an at least one amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 12, SEQ ID NO: 14, SEQ ID NO: 22, SEQ ID NO: 24, SEQ ID NO: 32, SEQ ID NO: 34, SEQ ID NO: 53, SEQ ID NO: 55, SEQ ID NO: 63, SEQ ID NO: 65, SEQ ID NO: 73, SEQ ID NO: 75, SEQ ID NO: 83, SEQ ID NO: 85, SEQ ID NO: 93, SEQ ID NO: 95, SEQ ID NO: 103, SEQ ID NO: 105, SEQ ID NO: 113, SEQ ID NO: 115, SEQ ID NO: 123 and SEQ ID NO: 125.
[0030] Also provided is an isolated antibody that comprises a first amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 59; a second amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 60, SEQ ID NO: 80 and SEQ ID NO: 160, with the proviso that when X1 of SEQ ID NO: 160 is serine, X2 of SEQ ID NO: 160 is not serine and X3 of SEQ ID NO: 160 is not threonine; and a third amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 61, SEQ ID NO: 81 and SEQ ID NO: 161.
[0031] Also provided is an isolated antibody that comprises a first amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 15, SEQ ID NO: 35 and SEQ ID NO: 66; a second amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 6 and SEQ ID NO: 67); and a third amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 7, SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO: 37 (LCDR3 Ab 1.9) and SEQ ID NO: 68.
[0032] Also provided is an isolated antibody that comprises a first amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 56, SEQ ID NO: 126 and SEQ ID NO: 162, with the proviso that when X1 of SEQ ID NO: 162 is serine, X3 of SEQ ID NO: 162 is not serine, arginine or asparagine; a second amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 57, SEQ ID NO: 77 and SEQ ID NO: 127; and a third amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 58 and SEQ ID NO: 128.
[0033] Also provided is an isolated antibody that comprises a first amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 86 and SEQ ID NO: 116; a second amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 87 and SEQ ID NO: 117; and a third amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 88 and SEQ ID NO: 118.
[0034] Nucleic acids encoding any of the preceding antibodies are also provided. In a related embodiment, a vector comprising any of the aforementioned nucleic acid sequences is provided. In still another embodiment, a host cell is provided comprising any of the aforementioned nucleic acids or vectors.
[0035] Numerous methods are contemplated in the present invention. For example, a method of producing an aforementioned specific binding agent is provided comprising culturing the aforementioned host cell such that the nucleic acid is expressed to produce the specific binding agent. Such methods may also comprise the step of recovering the specific binding agent from the host cell culture. In a related embodiment, an isolated specific binding agent produced by the aforementioned method is provided.
[0036] The invention further provides methods of using any of the preceding specific binding agents, for example, to treat or prevent a neurodegenerative or CNS disorder associated with amyloid-beta by administering an effective amount thereof, or to treat or prevent an amyloidogenic disease by administering an effective amount thereof.
[0037] The foregoing summary is not intended to define every aspect of the invention, and additional aspects are described in other sections, such as the Detailed Description. The entire document is intended to be related as a unified disclosure, and it should be understood that all combinations of features described herein are contemplated, even if the combination of features are not found together in the same sentence, or paragraph, or section of this document.
[0038] In addition to the foregoing, the invention includes, as an additional aspect, all embodiments of the invention narrower in scope in any way than the variations defined by specific paragraphs above. For example, certain aspects of the invention that are described as a genus, and it should be understood that every member of a genus is, individually, an aspect of the invention. Also, aspects described as a genus or selecting a member of a genus, should be understood to embrace combinations of two or more members of the genus. Although the applicant(s) invented the full scope of the invention described herein, the applicants do not intend to claim subject matter described in the prior art work of others. Therefore, in the event that statutory prior art within the scope of a claim is brought to the attention of the applicants by a Patent Office or other entity or individual, the applicant(s) reserve the right to exercise amendment rights under applicable patent laws to redefine the subject matter of such a claim to specifically exclude such statutory prior art or obvious variations of statutory prior art from the scope of such a claim. Variations of the invention defined by such amended claims also are intended as aspects of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0039] FIG. 1 shows the mean serum antibody concentration-time profiles following a single intravenous administration of 4.5 mg/kg of anti-Aβ antibody 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9 to male cynomolgus monkeys.
[0040] FIGS. 2A-2D illustrate quantitative morphological analysis of the plaque burden in cingulate cortex after treatment (1× per week) with mAb 2.1 IgG.
[0041] FIGS. 3A-3D illustrate quantitative morphological analysis of the plaque burden in cingulate cortex after treatment (3× per week) with mAb 2.1 IgG.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0042] Deposits of aggregated amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) in parenchymal amyloid plaques are a defining criterion of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, and Aβ aggregates (soluble or insoluble, oligomeric or fibrillar) are thought to trigger a pathogenic cascade resulting in the pathologic and clinical manifestations of AD. The primary component of amyloid plaques is a fibrillar aggregate comprising a 40 or 42 amino acid version of Aβ. Amyloid fibrils prepared in vitro from synthetic Aβ are morphologically indistinguishable from amyloid fibrils extracted from AD brain tissue (Kirschner et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84:6593-6597, 1987). A number of antibody candidates prepared against the 40 or 42 amino acid version of Aβ were evaluated for their ability to bind to in vitro prepared Aβ40 and Aβ42 monomers, fibrils and/or aggregates.
[0043] In exemplary embodiments of the invention, antibodies to Aβ were produced using transgenic mice in which genes responsible for endogenous antibody production have been inactivated and into which large segments of human genes responsible for antibody production have been inserted. A number of antibody candidates prepared against the 40 or 42 amino acid version of Aβ were evaluated for their ability to bind to in vitro prepared Aβ 40 and Aβ42 monomers, fibrils and/or aggregates. Antibodies were also evaluated for in vitro and ex vivo activity on plaque reduction and other histologic features characteristic of Alzheimer's disease. For human origin antibodies that would elicit a mouse anti-human immune response, surrogate antibodies of murine origin, with similar binding avidity and affinity for Aβ monomers and fibrils compared to their human antibody counterparts, were tested in vivo in murine models of disease.
[0044] The amino acid sequences of the heavy chain of each of antibody 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9, respectively, are set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 135, (of which residues 20-138 are the variable region, and residues 139-468 are the constant region) 139, (of which residues 20-140 are the variable region, and residues 141-470 are the constant region) and 143 (of which residues 20-140 are the variable region, and residues 141-470 are the constant region. The amino acid sequences of the heavy chain variable region of each of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 and 8.57, respectively, are set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 2, 12, 22, 32, 53, 63, 73, 83, 93, 103, 113 and 123. The cDNA sequences encoding the heavy chain of each of antibodies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9, respectively, are set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 134 (of which residues 58-414 are the variable region, and residues 415-1,404 are the constant region), 138 (of which residues 58-420 are the variable region, and residues 421-1,410 are the constant region) and 142 (of which residues 58-420 are the variable region, and residues 421-1,410 are the constant region). The amino acid sequences of the light chain of each of antibodies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9, respectively, are set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 133 (of which residues 21-132 are the variable region, and residues 133-239 are the constant region), 137 (of which residues 21-132 are the variable region, and residues 133-239 are the constant region) and 141 (of which residues 21-132 are the variable region, and residues 133-239 are the constant region). The amino acid sequences of the light chain variable region of each of antibody 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 and 8.57, respectively, are set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 4, 14, 24, 34, 55, 65, 75, 85, 95, 105, 115 and 125. The cDNA sequences encoding the light chain of each of antibodies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9, respectively, are set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 132 (of which residues 61-396 are the variable region, and residues 397-717 are the constant region), 136 (of which residues 61-396 are the variable region, and residues 397-717 are the constant region) and 140 (of which residues 61-396 are the variable region, and residues 397-717 are the constant region). The light and heavy chain CDRs (CDRL1, CDRL2, CDRL3, CDRH1, CDRH2, CDRH3) of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 and 8.57, respectively are set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 5-10; SEQ ID NOs: 15-20; SEQ ID NOs: 25-30; SEQ ID NOs: 35-40; SEQ ID NOs: 56-61; SEQ ID NOs: 66-71; SEQ ID NOs: 76-81; SEQ ID NOs: 86-91; SEQ ID NOs: 96-101; SEQ ID NOs: 106-111; SEQ ID NOs: 116-121 and SEQ ID NOs: 126-131.
[0045] In one embodiment, the antibody comprises amino acids 20-468 of SEQ ID NO: 135 and amino acids 21-239 of SEQ ID NO: 133. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises amino acids 20-470 of SEQ ID NO: 139 and amino acids 21-239 of SEQ ID NO: 137. In another embodiment, the antibody comprises amino acids 20-470 of SEQ ID NO: 143 and amino acids 21-239 of SEQ ID NO: 141.
[0046] Antibody-antigen interactions can be characterized by the association rate constant in M−1s−1 (ka), or the dissociation rate constant in s−1 (kd), or alternatively the dissociation equilibrium constant in M (KD).
[0047] The present invention provides a variety of specific binding agents, including but not limited to human Aβ-specific antibodies, that exhibit desirable characteristics such as binding affinity as measured by KD (dissociation equilibrium constant) for Aβ aggregates in the range of 10−9 M or lower, ranging down to 10−12 M or lower, or avidity as measured by kd (dissociation rate constant) for Aβ aggregates in the range of 104 s−1 or lower, or ranging down to 10−10 s−1 or lower, and/or amyloid-reducing activity and/or therapeutic efficacy for neurodegenerative or amyloidogenic disorders such as Alzheimer's disease or primary systemic amyloidosis. The invention also provides nucleic acids encoding such specific binding agent polypeptides, vectors and recombinant host cells comprising such nucleic acids, methods of producing such specific binding agents, pharmaceutical formulations including such specific binding agents, methods of preparing the pharmaceutical formulations, and methods of treating patients with the pharmaceutical formulations and compounds.
[0048] In some embodiments, the specific binding agents exhibit desirable characteristics such as binding avidity as measured by kd (dissociation rate constant) for Aβ or Aβ aggregates of about 10−2, 10−3, 10−4, 10−5, 10−6, 10−7, 10−8, 10−9, 10−10 s−1 or lower (lower values indicating higher binding avidity), and/or binding affinity as measured by KD (dissociation equilibrium constant) for Aβ or Aβ aggregates of about 10−9, 10−10, 10−11, 10−12, 10−13, 10−14, 10−15, 10−16 M or lower (lower values indicating higher binding affinity). In some embodiments, the specific binding agents induce amyloid plaque phagocytosis in an assay such as described in Example 5 below with an EC50 of 1 μg/mL. Preferably, the specific binding agents of the invention bind to unfixed plaques with high affinity (KD of about 10−10 M or better affinity) and avidity (kd of about 104 s−1 or better avidity). Dissociation rate constants or dissociation equilibrium constants may be readily determined using kinetic analysis techniques such as surface plasmon resonance (BIAcore), or KinExA using general procedures outlined by the manufacturer or other methods known in the art. The kinetic data obtained by BIAcore or KinExA may be analyzed by methods described by the manufacturer.
[0049] In some embodiments, the antibodies exhibit specificity for Aβ or Aβ aggregates or Aβ plaques. As used herein, an antibody is “specific for” an antigen when it has a significantly higher binding affinity for, and consequently is capable of distinguishing, that antigen compared to other unrelated proteins in different families. In some embodiments, the antibodies that bind to human Aβ cross-react with APP; while in other embodiments, the antibody binds only to Aβ and not to APP. In some embodiments, the antibodies that bind to human Aβ cross-react with Aβ of other species, such as murine, rat, or primate Aβ; while in other embodiments, the antibodies bind only to human or primate Aβ and not significantly to rodent Aβ. In some embodiments, antibodies specific for Aβ cross-react with other proteins in the same family, while in other embodiments, the antibodies distinguish Aβ from other related family members, such as amyloid precursor-like proteins.
[0050] In specific exemplary embodiments, the invention contemplates:
[0051] 1) a monoclonal antibody that retains any one, two, three, four, five, or six of CDRH1, CDRH2, CDRH3, CDRL1, CDRL2 or CDRL3 of any of antibody 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 or 8.57, optionally including one or two mutations (insertion, deletion or substitution) in such CDR(s),
[0052] 2) a monoclonal antibody that retains all of CDRH1, CDRH2, CDRH3, or the heavy chain variable region of any of antibody 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 or 8.57, optionally including one or two mutations in such CDR(s),
[0053] 3) a monoclonal antibody that retains all of CDRL1, CDRL2, CDRL3, or the light chain variable region of any of antibody 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 or 8.57, optionally including one or two mutations in such CDR(s),
[0054] 4) a monoclonal antibody that binds to the same epitope of Aβ as antibody 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 or 8.57, e.g. as determined through X-ray crystallography, or linear epitope binding; and/or
[0055] 5) a monoclonal antibody that competes with antibody 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 or 8.57 for binding to Aβ by more than about 75%, more than about 80%, or more than about 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94% or 95%.
[0056] In one embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 1.1 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 5-10). In another embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 1.2 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 15-20). In another embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 1.7 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 25-30). In another embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 1.9 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 35-40). In another embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 1.14 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 56-61). In another embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 1.15 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 66-71). In another embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 6.18 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 76-81). In another embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 6.27 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 86-91). In another embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 7.2 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 96-101). In another embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 7.11 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 106-111). In another embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 7.28 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 116-121). In another embodiment, the antibody comprises at least one, two, three, four, five or all of the antibody 8.57 CDRs (SEQ ID NOS: 126-131).
[0057] In some embodiments, the antibody comprises all three light chain CDRs, all three heavy chain CDRs, or all six CDRs. In some exemplary embodiments, two light chain CDRs from an antibody may be combined with a third light chain CDR from a different antibody. Alternatively, a CDRL1 from one antibody can be combined with a CDRL2 from a different antibody and a CDRL3 from yet another antibody, particularly where the CDRs are highly homologous. Similarly, two heavy chain CDRs from an antibody may be combined with a third heavy chain CDR from a different antibody; or a CDRH1 from one antibody can be combined with a CDRH2 from a different antibody and a CDRH3 from yet another antibody, particularly where the CDRs are highly homologous.
[0058] Consensus CDRs may also be used. In an exemplary embodiment, the antibody comprises one or more of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 31 or 32, wherein X is any amino acid and * can be absent or any amino acid. In another exemplary embodiment, the antibody comprises the amino acid sequence YISX1X2SSX3IYYADSVKG (SEQ ID NO: 160), where X1-X3 are any amino acid, with the proviso that when X1 is serine, X2 is not serine and X3 is not threonine. In another exemplary embodiment, the antibody comprises the amino acid sequence EX1TX2TTRX3YYYYYGX4DV (SEQ ID NO: 161), where X1-X4 o are any amino acid. In another exemplary embodiment, the antibody comprises the amino acid sequence RASQX1X2SSX3X4LA (SEQ ID NO: 162), where X1-X4 are any amino acid, with the proviso that when X1 is serine, X3 is not serine, arginine or asparagine.
[0059] In one embodiment, the antibody comprises a first amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 59; a second amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 60 and SEQ ID NO: 80 and SEQ ID NO: 160, with the proviso that when X1 of SEQ ID NO: 160 is serine, X2 of SEQ ID NO: 160 is not serine and X3 of SEQ ID NO: 160 is not threonine; and a third amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 61 and SEQ ID NO: 81.
[0060] In another embodiment the antibody comprises a first amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 59; a second amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 60 and SEQ ID NO: 80, and a third amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 61, SEQ ID NO: 81 and SEQ ID NO: 161.
[0061] In another embodiment, the antibody comprises a first amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 15 (LCDR11.2), SEQ ID NO: 35 and SEQ ID NO: 66; a second amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 6 and SEQ ID NO: 67; and a third amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 7 (LCDR3Ab 1.1), SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO: 37 and SEQ ID NO: 68.
[0062] In yet another embodiment, the antibody comprises a first amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 56, SEQ ID NO: 126 and SEQ ID NO: 162, with the proviso that when X′ of SEQ ID NO: 162 is serine, X3 of SEQ ID NO: 162 is not serine, arginine or asparagine; a second amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 57, SEQ ID NO: 77 and SEQ ID NO: 127; and a third amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 58 and SEQ ID NO: 128.
[0063] In yet another embodiment, the antibody comprises a first amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 86 and SEQ ID NO: 116; a second amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 87 and SEQ ID NO: 117; and a third amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 88 and SEQ ID NO: 118.
[0064] In another embodiment, the antibody comprises a first amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 8, SEQ ID NO: 18 and SEQ ID NO: 32; a second amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 9, SEQ ID NO: 19 and SEQ ID NO: 33; and a third amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 10 and SEQ ID NO: 20.
[0065] In yet another exemplary embodiment, the antibody comprises the light and/or heavy chain variable region, or both, of any of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 or 8.57. In some embodiments, the antibody comprises (a) the light chain variable region of an antibody selected from the group consisting of 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 and 8.57 and (b) the heavy chain variable region of any of an antibody selected from the group consisting of 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 and 8.57. In some embodiments, the antibody comprises an amino acid sequence at least about 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or more identical to the light and/or heavy chain variable region, or both, of any of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 or 8.57, and may comprise one, two or all three of the light chain CDRs and/or one, two, or all three of the heavy chain CDRs. In any of the foregoing embodiments, the specific binding agent or antibody polypeptide includes a sequence comprising one or two mutations to any of such CDRs.
[0066] In another exemplary embodiment, the antibody comprises the heavy chain variable region of any of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 or 8.57 and optionally comprises a constant region selected from the group consisting of a human IgG1 heavy chain constant region (SEQ ID NOs: 144-145) and a human IgG2 heavy chain constant region (SEQ ID NOs: 146-147). In another exemplary embodiment, the antibody comprises the light chain variable region of any of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18 and 8.57 and optionally comprises a human kappa light chain constant region (SEQ ID NOs: 148-149). In another exemplary embodiment, the antibody comprises the light chain variable region of any of antibodies 6.27, 7.2, 7.11 and 7.28 and optionally comprises a constant region selected from the group consisting of a human lambda light chain constant region type C1 (SEQ ID NOs: 150-151), a human lambda light chain constant region type C2 (SEQ ID NOs: 152-153), a human lambda light chain constant region type C3 (SEQ ID NOs: 154-155), a human lambda light chain constant region type C6 (SEQ ID NOs: 156-157) and a human lambda light chain constant region type C7 (SEQ ID NO: 158-159).
[0067] The term “amyloid-beta” or “Aβ” refers to the naturally-occurring human amyloid-beta polypeptide set forth in SEQ ID NO: 43. Naturally-occurring human Aβ polypeptide ranges in length from 39 to 43 amino acids (residues 1 to 39, 1 to 40, 1 to 41, 1 to 42, or 1 to 43 of SEQ ID NO: 43) and is a proteolytic cleavage product of the amyloid precursor protein (APP).
[0068] The term “amyloidogenic disease” includes any disease associated with (or caused by) the formation or deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils. Exemplary amyloidogenic disease include, but are not limited to Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment, Parkinson's Disease with dementia, Down's Syndrome, Diffuse Lewy Body (DLB) disease, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA), vascular dementia and mixed dementia (vascular dementia and AD), amyloidosis associated with multiple myeloma, primary systemic amyloidosis (PSA), and secondary systemic amyloidosis with evidence of coexisting previous chronic inflammatory or infectious conditions. Different amyloidogenic diseases are defined or characterized by the nature of the polypeptide component of the fibrils deposited. For example, in subjects or patients having Alzheimer's disease, β-amyloid protein (e.g., wild-type, variant, or truncated β-amyloid protein) is the characterizing polypeptide component of the amyloid deposit. PSA involves the deposition of insoluble monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) light (L) chains or L-chain fragments in various tissues, including smooth and striated muscles, connective tissues, blood vessel walls, and peripheral nerves.
[0069] “Treatment” is an intervention performed with the intention of preventing the development or altering the pathology of a disorder. Accordingly, “treatment” refers to both therapeutic treatment and prophylactic or preventative measures. Those in need of treatment include those already with the disorder as well as those in which the disorder is to be prevented.
[0070] “Mammal” for purposes of treatment refers to any animal classified as a mammal, including humans, domestic and farm animals, and zoo, sports, or pet animals, such as dogs, horses, cats, cows, etc. Preferably, the mammal is human.
[0071] As used herein, the phrase “therapeutically effective amount” is meant to refer to an amount of Aβ-specific binding agent (including antibody) that provides a reduction in the number, size or complexity of amyloid plaques or amyloid aggregates in brain, or that provides a reduction in the severity or progression of symptoms associated with disease (i.e. that provides “therapeutic efficacy”).
[0072] The phrase “amyloid-reducing activity” is meant to refer to the ability to inhibit, fully or partially, amyloid fibril formation, aggregation, or plaque formation or to remove or reduce existing amyloid fibrils, aggregates, or plaques.
[0073] The term “antibody” is used in the broadest sense and includes fully assembled antibodies, monoclonal antibodies (including human, humanized or chimeric antibodies), polyclonal antibodies, multispecific antibodies (e.g., bispecific antibodies), and antibody fragments that can bind antigen (e.g., Fab′, F′(ab)2, Fv, single chain antibodies, diabodies), comprising complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of the foregoing as long as they exhibit the desired biological activity. Multimers or aggregates of intact molecules and/or fragments, including chemically derivatized antibodies, are contemplated. Antibodies of any isotype class or subclass, including IgG, IgM, IgD, IgA, and IgE, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgA1 and IgA2, or any allotype, are contemplated. Different isotypes have different effector functions; for example, IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes have antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity.
[0074] The term “specific binding agent” includes antibodies as defined above and recombinant peptides or other compounds that contain sequences derived from CDRs having the desired antigen-binding properties.
[0075] An “isolated” antibody is one that has been identified and separated from a component of its natural environment. Contaminant components of its natural environment are materials that would interfere with diagnostic or therapeutic uses for the antibody, and may include enzymes, hormones, and other proteinaceous or nonproteinaceous solutes. In preferred embodiments, the antibody will be purified (1) to greater than 95% by weight of antibody, and most preferably more than 99% by weight, (2) to a degree sufficient to obtain at least 15 residues of N-terminal or internal amino acid sequence, or (3) to homogeneity by SDS-PAGE under reducing or nonreducing conditions using Coomassie blue or, preferably, silver stain. Isolated naturally occurring antibody includes the antibody in situ within recombinant cells since at least one component of the antibody's natural environment will not be present. Ordinarily, however, isolated antibody will be prepared by at least one purification step.
[0076] The term “monoclonal antibody” as used herein refers to an antibody obtained from a population of substantially homogeneous antibodies, i.e., the individual antibodies comprising the population are identical except for possible naturally occurring mutations that may be present in minor amounts. Monoclonal antibodies are highly specific, being directed against an individual antigenic site or epitope, in contrast to polyclonal antibody preparations that typically include different antibodies directed against different epitopes. Nonlimiting examples of monoclonal antibodies include murine, rabbit, rat, chicken, chimeric, humanized, or human antibodies, fully assembled antibodies, multispecific antibodies (including bispecific antibodies), antibody fragments that can bind an antigen (including, Fab′, F′(ab)2, Fv, single chain antibodies, diabodies), maxibodies, nanobodies, and recombinant peptides comprising CDRs of the foregoing as long as they exhibit the desired biological activity, or variants or derivatives thereof.
[0077] The modifier “monoclonal” indicates the character of the antibody as being obtained from a substantially homogeneous population of antibodies, and is not to be construed as requiring production of the antibody by any particular method. For example, the monoclonal antibodies to be used in accordance with the present invention may be made by the hybridoma method first described by Kohler et al., Nature, 256:495 [1975], or may be made by recombinant DNA methods (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567). The “monoclonal antibodies” may also be isolated from phage antibody libraries using the techniques described in Clackson et al., Nature, 352:624-628[1991] and Marks et al., J. Mol. Biol., 222:581-597 (1991), for example.
[0078] An “immunoglobulin” or “native antibody” is a tetrameric glycoprotein. In a naturally-occurring immunoglobulin, each tetramer is composed of two identical pairs of polypeptide chains, each pair having one “light” chain of about 220 amino acids (about 25 kDa) and one “heavy” chain of about 440 amino acids (about 50-70 kDa). The amino-terminal portion of each chain includes a “variable” (“V”) region of about 100 to 110 or more amino acids primarily responsible for antigen recognition. The carboxy-terminal portion of each chain defines a constant region primarily responsible for effector function. The variable region differs among different antibodies, the constant region is the same among different antibodies. Within the variable region of each heavy or light chain, there are three hypervariable subregions that help determine the antibody's specificity for antigen. The variable domain residues between the hypervariable regions are called the framework residues and generally are somewhat homologous among different antibodies. Immunoglobulins can be assigned to different classes depending on the amino acid sequence of the constant domain of their heavy chains. Heavy chains are classified as mu (μ), delta (Δ), gamma (γ), alpha (α), and epsilon (ε), and define the antibody's isotype as IgM, IgD, IgG, IgA, and IgE, respectively. Several of these may be further divided into subclasses or isotypes, e.g. IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgA1 and IgA2. Different isotypes have different effector functions; for example, IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes have antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity. Human light chains are classified as kappa (κ) and lambda (λ) light chains. Within light and heavy chains, the variable and constant regions are joined by a “J” region of about 12 or more amino acids, with the heavy chain also including a “D” region of about 10 more amino acids. See generally, Fundamental Immunology, Ch. 7 (Paul, W., ed., 2nd ed. Raven Press, N.Y. (1989)).
[0079] Allotypes are variations in antibody sequence, often in the constant region, that can be immunogenic and are encoded by specific alleles in humans. Allotypes have been identified for five of the human IGHC genes, the IGHG1, IGHG2, IGHG3, IGHA2 and IGHE genes, and are designated as G1m, G2m, G3m, A2m, and Em allotypes, respectively. At least 18 Gm allotypes are known: nG1m(1), nGlm(2), G1 m (1, 2, 3, 17) or G1m (a, x, f, z), G2m (23) or G2m (n), G3m (5, 6, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21, 24, 26, 27, 28) or G3m (b1, c3, b5, b0, b3, b4, s, t, g1, c5, u, v, g5). There are two A2m allotypes A2m(1) and A2m(2).
[0080] For a detailed description of the structure and generation of antibodies, see Roth, D. B., and Craig, N. L., Cell, 94:411-414 (1998), herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Briefly, the process for generating DNA encoding the heavy and light chain immunoglobulin sequences occurs primarily in developing B-cells. Prior to the rearranging and joining of various immunoglobulin gene segments, the V, D, J and constant (C) gene segments are found generally in relatively close proximity on a single chromosome. During B-cell-differentiation, one of each of the appropriate family members of the V, D, J (or only V and J in the case of light chain genes) gene segments are recombined to form functionally rearranged variable regions of the heavy and light immunoglobulin genes. This gene segment rearrangement process appears to be sequential. First, heavy chain D-to-J joints are made, followed by heavy chain V-to-DJ joints and light chain V-to-J joints. In addition to the rearrangement of V, D and J segments, further diversity is generated in the primary repertoire of immunoglobulin heavy and light chains by way of variable recombination at the locations where the V and J segments in the light chain are joined and where the D and J segments of the heavy chain are joined. Such variation in the light chain typically occurs within the last codon of the V gene segment and the first codon of the J segment. Similar imprecision in joining occurs on the heavy chain chromosome between the D and JH segments and may extend over as many as 10 nucleotides. Furthermore, several nucleotides may be inserted between the D and JH and between the VH and D gene segments which are not encoded by genomic DNA. The addition of these nucleotides is known as N-region diversity. The net effect of such rearrangements in the variable region gene segments and the variable recombination which may occur during such joining is the production of a primary antibody repertoire.
[0081] The term “hypervariable” region refers to the amino acid residues of an antibody which are responsible for antigen-binding. The hypervariable region comprises amino acid residues from a complementarity determining region or CDR [i.e., residues 24-34 (L1), 50-56 (L2) and 89-97 (L3) in the light chain variable domain and 31-35 (H1), 50-65 (H2) and 95-102 (H3) in the heavy chain variable domain as described by Kabat et al., Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th Ed. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. (1991)]. Even a single CDR may recognize and bind antigen, although with a lower affinity than the entire antigen binding site containing all of the CDRs.
[0082] An alternative definition of residues from a hypervariable “loop” is described by Chothia et al., J. Mol. Biol. 196: 901-917 (1987) as residues 26-32 (L1), 50-52 (L2) and 91-96 (L3) in the light chain variable domain and 26-32 (H1), 53-55 (H2) and 96-101 (H3) in the heavy chain variable domain.
[0083] “Framework” or FR residues are those variable region residues other than the hypervariable region residues.
[0084] “Antibody fragments” comprise a portion of an intact full length antibody, preferably the antigen binding or variable region of the intact antibody. Examples of antibody fragments include Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)2, and Fv fragments; diabodies; linear antibodies (Zapata et al., Protein Eng., 8(10):1057-1062 (1995)); single-chain antibody molecules; and multispecific antibodies formed from antibody fragments.
[0085] Papain digestion of antibodies produces two identical antigen-binding fragments, called “Fab” fragments, each with a single antigen-binding site, and a residual “Fc” fragment which contains the constant region. The Fab fragment contains all of the variable domain, as well as the constant domain of the light chain and the first constant domain (CH1) of the heavy chain. The Fc fragment displays carbohydrates and is responsible for many antibody effector functions (such as binding complement and cell receptors), that distinguish one class of antibody from another.
[0086] Pepsin treatment yields an F(ab′)2 fragment that has two “Single-chain Fv” or “scFv” antibody fragments comprising the VH and VL domains of antibody, wherein these domains are present in a single polypeptide chain. Fab fragments differ from Fab′ fragments by the inclusion of a few additional residues at the carboxy terminus of the heavy chain CH1 domain including one or more cysteines from the antibody hinge region. Preferably, the Fv polypeptide further comprises a polypeptide linker between the VH and VL domains that enables the Fv to form the desired structure for antigen binding. For a review of scFv see Pluckthun in The Pharmacology of Monoclonal Antibodies, vol. 1 13, Rosenburg and Moore eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 269-315 (1994).
[0087] “Fv” is the minimum antibody fragment that contains a complete antigen recognition and binding site. This region consists of a dimer of one heavy- and one light-chain variable domain in tight, non-covalent association. It is in this configuration that the three CDRs of each variable domain interact to define an antigen binding site on the surface of the VH VL dimer. A single variable domain (or half of an Fv comprising only three CDRs specific for an antigen) has the ability to recognize and bind antigen, although at a lower affinity than the entire binding site.
[0088] The term “modification” when used in connection with specific binding agents, including antibodies, of the invention, include, but are not limited to, one or more amino acid changes (including substitutions, insertions or deletions); chemical modifications; covalent modification by conjugation to therapeutic or diagnostic agents; labeling (e.g., with radionuclides or various enzymes); covalent polymer attachment such as pegylation (derivatization with polyethylene glycol) and insertion or substitution by chemical synthesis of non-natural amino acids. Modified specific binding agents of the invention will retain the binding properties of unmodified molecules of the invention.
[0089] The term “derivative” when used in connection with specific binding agents (including antibodies) of the invention refers to specific binding agents that are covalently modified by conjugation to therapeutic or diagnostic agents, labeling (e.g., with radionuclides or various enzymes), covalent polymer attachment such as pegylation (derivatization with polyethylene glycol) and insertion or substitution by chemical synthesis of non-natural amino acids. Derivatives of the invention will retain the binding properties of underivatized molecules of the invention.
[0090] Thus, the invention provides a variety of compositions comprising one, two, and/or three CDRs of a heavy chain variable region and/or a light chain variable region of an antibody including modifications or derivatives thereof. Such compositions may be generated by techniques described herein or known in the art.
[0091] As provided herein, the compositions for and methods of treating neurodegenerative disorders may utilize one or more anti-Aβ specific binding agents used singularly or in combination with other therapeutics to achieve the desired effects.
I. Production of Antibodies
[0092] Polyclonal Antibodies
[0093] Polyclonal antibodies are preferably raised in animals by multiple subcutaneous (sc) or intraperitoneal (ip) injections of the relevant antigen and an adjuvant. Alternatively, antigen may be injected directly into the animal's lymph node (see Kilpatrick et al., Hybridoma, 16:381-389, 1997). An improved antibody response may be obtained by conjugating the relevant antigen to a protein that is immunogenic in the species to be immunized, e.g., keyhole limpet hemocyanin, serum albumin, bovine thyroglobulin, or soybean trypsin inhibitor using a bifunctional or derivatizing agent, for example, maleimidobenzoyl sulfosuccinimide ester (conjugation through cysteine residues), N-hydroxysuccinimide (through lysine residues), glutaraldehyde, succinic anhydride or other agents known in the art.
[0094] Animals are immunized against the antigen, immunogenic conjugates, or derivatives by combining, e.g., 100 μg of the protein or conjugate (for mice) with 3 volumes of Freund's complete adjuvant and injecting the solution intradermally at multiple sites. One month later, the animals are boosted with ⅕ to 1/10 the original amount of peptide or conjugate in Freund's complete adjuvant by subcutaneous injection at multiple sites. At 7-14 days post-booster injection, the animals are bled and the serum is assayed for antibody titer. Animals are boosted until the titer plateaus. Preferably, the animal is boosted with the conjugate of the same antigen, but conjugated to a different protein and/or through a different cross-linking reagent. Conjugates also can be made in recombinant cell culture as protein fusions. Also, aggregating agents such as alum are suitably used to enhance the immune response.
[0095] Monoclonal Antibodies
[0096] Monoclonal antibodies may be made using the hybridoma method first described by Kohler et al., Nature, 256:495 (1975), or may be made by recombinant DNA methods.
[0097] In the hybridoma method, a mouse or other appropriate host animal, such as rats, hamster or macaque monkey, is immunized as herein described to elicit lymphocytes that produce or are capable of producing antibodies that will specifically bind to the protein used for immunization. Alternatively, lymphocytes may be immunized in vitro. Lymphocytes then are fused with myeloma cells using a suitable fusing agent, such as polyethylene glycol, to form a hybridoma cell (Goding, Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Practice, pp. 59-103 (Academic Press, 1986)).
[0098] The hybridoma cells thus prepared are seeded and grown in a suitable culture medium that preferably contains one or more substances that inhibit the growth or survival of the unfused, parental myeloma cells. For example, if the parental myeloma cells lack the enzyme hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HGPRT or HPRT), the culture medium for the hybridomas typically will include hypoxanthine, aminopterin, and thymidine (HAT medium), which substances prevent the growth of HGPRT-deficient cells.
[0099] Preferred myeloma cells are those that fuse efficiently, support stable high-level production of antibody by the selected antibody-producing cells, and are sensitive to a medium. Human myeloma and mouse-human heteromyeloma cell lines also have been described for the production of human monoclonal antibodies (Kozbor, J. Immunol., 133: 3001 (1984); Brodeur et al., Monoclonal Antibody Production Techniques and Applications, pp. 51-63 (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1987)). Exemplary murine myeloma lines include those derived from MOP-21 and M.C.-11 mouse tumors available from the Salk Institute Cell Distribution Center, San Diego, Calif. USA, and SP-2 or X63-Ag8-653 cells available from the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md. USA.
[0100] Culture medium in which hybridoma cells are growing is assayed for production of monoclonal antibodies directed against the antigen. Preferably, the binding specificity of monoclonal antibodies produced by hybridoma cells is determined by immunoprecipitation or by an in vitro binding assay, such as radioimmunoassay (RIA) or enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA). The binding affinity of the monoclonal antibody can, for example, be determined by BIAcore or Scatchard analysis (Munson et al., Anal. Biochem., 107:220 (1980)).
[0101] After hybridoma cells are identified that produce antibodies of the desired specificity, affinity, and/or activity, the clones may be subcloned by limiting dilution procedures and grown by standard methods (Goding, Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Practice, pp. 59-103 (Academic Press, 1986)). Suitable culture media for this purpose include, for example, D-MEM or RPMI-1640 medium. In addition, the hybridoma cells may be grown in vivo as ascites tumors in an animal. The monoclonal antibodies secreted by the subclones are suitably separated from the culture medium, ascites fluid, or serum by conventional immunoglobulin purification procedures such as, for example, protein A-Sepharose, hydroxylapatite chromatography, gel electrophoresis, dialysis, or affinity chromatography.
[0102] Recombinant Production of Antibodies
[0103] The invention provides isolated nucleic acids encoding any of the antibodies (polyclonal and monoclonal), including antibody fragments, of the invention described herein, optionally operably linked to control sequences recognized by a host cell, vectors and host cells comprising the nucleic acids, and recombinant techniques for the production of the antibodies, which may comprise culturing the host cell so that the nucleic acid is expressed and, optionally, recovering the antibody from the host cell culture or culture medium. Similar materials and methods apply to production of polypeptide-based specific binding agents.
[0104] Relevant amino acid sequence from an immunoglobulin or polypeptide of interest may be determined by direct protein sequencing, and suitable encoding nucleotide sequences can be designed according to a universal codon table. Alternatively, genomic or cDNA encoding the monoclonal antibodies may be isolated and sequenced from cells producing such antibodies using conventional procedures (e.g., by using oligonucleotide probes that are capable of binding specifically to genes encoding the heavy and light chains of the monoclonal antibodies).
[0105] Cloning is carried out using standard techniques (see, e.g., Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Guide, Vols 1-3, Cold Spring Harbor Press, which is incorporated herein by reference). For example, a cDNA library may be constructed by reverse transcription of polyA+ mRNA, preferably membrane-associated mRNA, and the library screened using probes specific for human immunoglobulin polypeptide gene sequences. In one embodiment, however, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used to amplify cDNAs (or portions of full-length cDNAs) encoding an immunoglobulin gene segment of interest (e.g., a light or heavy chain variable segment). The amplified sequences can be readily cloned into any suitable vector, e.g., expression vectors, minigene vectors, or phage display vectors. It will be appreciated that the particular method of cloning used is not critical, so long as it is possible to determine the sequence of some portion of the immunoglobulin polypeptide of interest.
[0106] One source for antibody nucleic acids is a hybridoma produced by obtaining a B cell from an animal immunized with the antigen of interest and fusing it to an immortal cell. Alternatively, nucleic acid can be isolated from B cells (or whole spleen) of the immunized animal. Yet another source of nucleic acids encoding antibodies is a library of such nucleic acids generated, for example, through phage display technology. Polynucleotides encoding peptides of interest, e.g., variable region peptides with desired binding characteristics, can be identified by standard techniques such as panning.
[0107] The sequence encoding an entire variable region of the immunoglobulin polypeptide may be determined; however, it will sometimes be adequate to sequence only a portion of a variable region, for example, the CDR-encoding portion. Sequencing is carried out using standard techniques (see, e.g., Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Guide, Vols 1-3, Cold Spring Harbor Press, and Sanger, F. et al. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74: 5463-5467, which is incorporated herein by reference). By comparing the sequence of the cloned nucleic acid with published sequences of human immunoglobulin genes and cDNAs, one of skill will readily be able to determine, depending on the region sequenced, (i) the germline segment usage of the hybridoma immunoglobulin polypeptide (including the isotype of the heavy chain) and (ii) the sequence of the heavy and light chain variable regions, including sequences resulting from N-region addition and the process of somatic mutation. One source of immunoglobulin gene sequence information is the National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
[0108] As used herein, an “isolated nucleic acid molecule” or “isolated nucleic acid sequence” is a nucleic acid molecule that is either (1) identified and separated from at least one contaminant nucleic acid molecule with which it is ordinarily associated in the natural source of the nucleic acid or (2) cloned, amplified, tagged, or otherwise distinguished from background nucleic acids such that the sequence of the nucleic acid of interest can be determined. An isolated nucleic acid molecule is other than in the form or setting in which it is found in nature. However, an isolated nucleic acid molecule includes a nucleic acid molecule contained in cells that ordinarily express the specific binding agent (e.g., antibody) where, for example, the nucleic acid molecule is in a chromosomal location different from that of natural cells.
[0109] Once isolated, the DNA may be operably linked to expression control sequences or placed into expression vectors, which are then transfected into host cells that do not otherwise produce immunoglobulin protein, to direct the synthesis of monoclonal antibodies in the recombinant host cells. Recombinant production of antibodies is well known in the art.
[0110] “Expression control sequences” refer to DNA sequences necessary for the expression of an operably linked coding sequence in a particular host organism. The control sequences that are suitable for prokaryotes, for example, include a promoter, optionally an operator sequence, and a ribosome binding site. Eukaryotic cells are known to utilize promoters, polyadenylation signals, and enhancers.
[0111] Nucleic acid is operably linked when it is placed into a functional relationship with another nucleic acid sequence. For example, DNA for a presequence or secretory leader is operably linked to DNA for a polypeptide if it is expressed as a preprotein that participates in the secretion of the polypeptide; a promoter or enhancer is operably linked to a coding sequence if it affects the transcription of the sequence; or a ribosome binding site is operably linked to a coding sequence if it is positioned so as to facilitate translation. Generally, operably linked means that the DNA sequences being linked are contiguous, and, in the case of a secretory leader, contiguous and in reading phase. However, enhancers do not have to be contiguous. Linking is accomplished by ligation at convenient restriction sites. If such sites do not exist, the synthetic oligonucleotide adaptors or linkers are used in accordance with conventional practice.
[0112] Many vectors are known in the art. Vector components may include one or more of the following: a signal sequence (that may, for example, direct secretion of the antibody), an origin of replication, one or more selective marker genes (that may, for example, confer antibiotic or other drug resistance, complement auxotrophic deficiencies, or supply critical nutrients not available in the media), an enhancer element, a promoter, and a transcription termination sequence, all of which are well known in the art.
[0113] Cell, cell line, and cell culture are often used interchangeably and all such designations herein include progeny. Transformants and transformed cells include the primary subject cell and cultures derived therefrom without regard for the number of transfers. It is also understood that all progeny may not be precisely identical in DNA content, due to deliberate or inadvertent mutations. Mutant progeny that have the same function or biological activity as screened for in the originally transformed cell are included.
[0114] Exemplary host cells include prokaryote, yeast, or higher eukaryote cells. Prokaryotic host cells include eubacteria, such as Gram-negative or Gram-positive organisms, for example, Enterobacteriaceae such as Escherichia, e.g., E. coli, Enterobacter, Erwinia, Klebsiella, Proteus, Salmonella, e.g., Salmonella typhimurium, Serratia, e.g., Serratia marcescans, and Shigella, as well as Bacilli such as B. subtilis and B. licheniformis, Pseudomonas, and Streptomyces. Eukaryotic microbes such as filamentous fungi or yeast are suitable cloning or expression hosts for recombinant polypeptides or antibodies. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, or common baker's yeast, is the most commonly used among lower eukaryotic host microorganisms. However, a number of other genera, species, and strains are commonly available and useful herein, such as Pichia, e.g. P. pastoris, Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Kluyveromyces, Yarrowia; Candida; Trichoderma reesia; Neurospora crassa; Schwanniomyces such as Schwanniomyces occidentalis; and filamentous fungi such as, e.g., Neurospora, Penicillium, Tolypocladium, and Aspergillus hosts such as A. nidulans and A. niger.
[0115] Host cells for the expression of glycosylated specific binding agent, including antibody, can be derived from multicellular organisms. Examples of invertebrate cells include plant and insect cells. Numerous baculoviral strains and variants and corresponding permissive insect host cells from hosts such as Spodoptera frugiperda (caterpillar), Aedes aegypti (mosquito), Aedes albopictus (mosquito), Drosophila melanogaster (fruitfly), and Bombyx mori have been identified. A variety of viral strains for transfection of such cells are publicly available, e.g., the L-1 variant of Autographa californica NPV and the Bm-5 strain of Bombyx mori NPV.
[0116] Vertebrate host cells are also suitable hosts, and recombinant production of specific binding agent (including antibody) from such cells has become routine procedure. Examples of useful mammalian host cell lines are Chinese hamster ovary cells, including CHOK1 cells (ATCC CCL61), DXB-11, DG-44, and Chinese hamster ovary cells/−DHFR (CHO, Urlaub et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 4216 (1980)); monkey kidney CV1 line transformed by SV40 (COS-7, ATCC CRL 1651); human embryonic kidney line (293 or 293 cells subcloned for growth in suspension culture, [Graham et al., J. Gen Virol. 36: 59 (1977)]; baby hamster kidney cells (BHK, ATCC CCL 10); mouse sertoli cells (TM4, Mather, Biol. Reprod. 23: 243-251 (1980)); monkey kidney cells (CV1 ATCC CCL 70); African green monkey kidney cells (VERO-76, ATCC CRL-1587); human cervical carcinoma cells (HELA, ATCC CCL 2); canine kidney cells (MDCK, ATCC CCL 34); buffalo rat liver cells (BRL 3A, ATCC CRL 1442); human lung cells (W138, ATCC CCL 75); human hepatoma cells (Hep G2, HB 8065); mouse mammary tumor (MMT 060562, ATCC CCL51); TR1 cells (Mather et al., Annals N.Y. Acad. Sci. 383: 44-68 (1982)); MRC 5 cells or FS4 cells; or mammalian myeloma cells.
[0117] Host cells are transformed or transfected with the above-described nucleic acids or vectors for production specific binding agents and are cultured in conventional nutrient media modified as appropriate for inducing promoters, selecting transformants, or amplifying the genes encoding the desired sequences. In addition, novel vectors and transfected cell lines with multiple copies of transcription units separated by a selective marker are particularly useful for the expression of specific binding agents.
[0118] The host cells used to produce the specific binding agents of the invention may be cultured in a variety of media. Commercially available media such as Ham's F10 (Sigma), Minimal Essential Medium ((MEM), (Sigma), RPMI-1640 (Sigma), and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium ((DMEM), Sigma) are suitable for culturing the host cells. In addition, any of the media described in Ham et al., Meth. Enz. 58: 44 (1979), Barnes et al., Anal. Biochem. 102: 255 (1980), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,767,704; 4,657,866; 4,927,762; 4,560,655; or 5,122,469; WO90103430; WO 87/00195; or U.S. Pat. Re. No. 30,985 may be used as culture media for the host cells. Any of these media may be supplemented as necessary with hormones and/or other growth factors (such as insulin, transferrin, or epidermal growth factor), salts (such as sodium chloride, calcium, magnesium, and phosphate), buffers (such as HEPES), nucleotides (such as adenosine and thymidine), antibiotics (such as Gentamycin™ drug), trace elements (defined as inorganic compounds usually present at final concentrations in the micromolar range), and glucose or an equivalent energy source. Any other necessary supplements may also be included at appropriate concentrations that would be known to those skilled in the art. The culture conditions, such as temperature, pH, and the like, are those previously used with the host cell selected for expression, and will be apparent to the ordinarily skilled artisan.
[0119] Upon culturing the host cells, the specific binding agent can be produced intracellularly, in the periplasmic space, or directly secreted into the medium. If the specific binding agent is produced intracellularly, as a first step, the particulate debris, either host cells or lysed fragments, is removed, for example, by centrifugation or ultrafiltration.
[0120] The specific binding agent can be purified using, for example, hydroxylapatite chromatography, cation or anion exchange chromatography, or preferably affinity chromatography, using the antigen of interest or protein A or protein G as an affinity ligand. Protein A can be used to purify proteins that include polypeptides are based on human γ1, γ2, or γ4 heavy chains (Lindmark et al., J. Immunol. Meth. 62: 1-13 (1983)). Protein G is recommended for all mouse isotypes and for human γ3 (Guss et al., EMBO J. 5: 15671575 (1986)). The matrix to which the affinity ligand is attached is most often agarose, but other matrices are available. Mechanically stable matrices such as controlled pore glass or poly(styrenedivinyl)benzene allow for faster flow rates and shorter processing times than can be achieved with agarose. Where the protein comprises a CH 3 domain, the Bakerbond ABX™ resin (J. T. Baker, Phillipsburg, N.J.) is useful for purification. Other techniques for protein purification such as ethanol precipitation, Reverse Phase HPLC, chromatofocusing, SDS-PAGE, and ammonium sulfate precipitation are also possible depending on the antibody to be recovered.
[0121] Chimeric, Humanized and Human Engineered™ Antibodies
[0122] Chimeric monoclonal antibodies, in which the variable Ig domains of a rodent monoclonal antibody are fused to human constant Ig domains, can be generated using standard procedures known in the art (See Morrison, S. L., et al. (1984) Chimeric Human Antibody Molecules; Mouse Antigen Binding Domains with Human Constant Region Domains, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 6841-6855; and, Boulianne, G. L., et al, Nature 312, 643-646. (1984)). A number of techniques have been described for humanizing or modifying antibody sequence to be more human-like, for example, by (1) grafting the non-human complementarity determining regions (CDRs) onto a human framework and constant region (a process referred to in the art as humanizing through “CDR grafting”) or (2) transplanting the entire non-human variable domains, but “cloaking” them with a human-like surface by replacement of surface residues (a process referred to in the art as “veneering”) or (3) modifying selected non-human amino acid residues to be more human, based on each residue's likelihood of participating in antigen-binding or antibody structure and its likelihood for immunogenicity. See, e.g., Jones et al., Nature 321:522 525 (1986); Morrison et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 81:6851 6855 (1984); Morrison and Oi, Adv. Immunol., 44:65 92 (1988); Verhoeyer et al., Science 239:1534 1536 (1988); Padlan, Molec. Immun. 28:489 498 (1991); Padlan, Molec. Immunol. 31(3):169 217 (1994); and Kettleborough, C. A. et al., Protein Eng. 4(7):773 83 (1991); Co, M. S., et al. (1994), J. Immunol. 152, 2968-2976); Studnicka et al. Protein Engineering 7: 805-814 (1994); each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0123] Antibodies to Aβ can also be produced using transgenic animals that have no endogenous immunoglobulin production and are engineered to contain human immunoglobulin loci. For example, WO 98/24893 discloses transgenic animals having a human Ig locus wherein the animals do not produce functional endogenous immunoglobulins due to the inactivation of endogenous heavy and light chain loci. WO 91/10741 also discloses transgenic non-primate mammalian hosts capable of mounting an immune response to an immunogen, wherein the antibodies have primate constant and/or variable regions, and wherein the endogenous immunoglobulin encoding loci are substituted or inactivated. WO 96/30498 discloses the use of the Cre/Lox system to modify the immunoglobulin locus in a mammal, such as to replace all or a portion of the constant or variable region to form a modified antibody molecule. WO 94/02602 discloses non-human mammalian hosts having inactivated endogenous Ig loci and functional human Ig loci. U.S. Pat. No. 5,939,598 discloses methods of making transgenic mice in which the mice lack endogenous heavy chains, and express an exogenous immunoglobulin locus comprising one or more xenogeneic constant regions.
[0124] Using a transgenic animal described above, an immune response can be produced to a selected antigenic molecule, and antibody producing cells can be removed from the animal and used to produce hybridomas that secrete human-derived monoclonal antibodies. Immunization protocols, adjuvants, and the like are known in the art, and are used in immunization of, for example, a transgenic mouse as described in WO 96/33735. The monoclonal antibodies can be tested for the ability to inhibit or neutralize the biological activity or physiological effect of the corresponding protein.
[0125] See also Jakobovits et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:2551 (1993); Jakobovits et al., Nature, 362:255-258 (1993); Bruggermann et al., Year in Immuno., 7:33 (1993); Mendez et al., Nat. Genet. 15:146-156 (1997); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,669, U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,369, U.S. Pat. No. 5,545,807; and U.S Patent Application No. 20020199213. U.S. Patent Application No. and 20030092125 describes methods for biasing the immune response of an animal to the desired epitope. Human antibodies may also be generated by in vitro activated B cells (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,567,610 and 5,229,275).
[0126] Antibody Production by Phage Display Techniques
[0127] The development of technologies for making repertoires of recombinant human antibody genes, and the display of the encoded antibody fragments on the surface of filamentous bacteriophage, has provided another means for generating human-derived antibodies. Phage display is described in e.g., Dower et al., WO 91/17271, McCafferty et al., WO 92/01047, and Caton and Koprowski, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87:6450-6454 (1990), each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The antibodies produced by phage technology are usually produced as antigen binding fragments, e.g. Fv or Fab fragments, in bacteria and thus lack effector functions. Effector functions can be introduced by one of two strategies: The fragments can be engineered either into complete antibodies for expression in mammalian cells, or into bispecific antibody fragments with a second binding site capable of triggering an effector function.
[0128] Typically, the Fd fragment (VH-CH1) and light chain (VL-CL) of antibodies are separately cloned by PCR and recombined randomly in combinatorial phage display libraries, which can then be selected for binding to a particular antigen. The antibody fragments are expressed on the phage surface, and selection of Fv or Fab (and therefore the phage containing the DNA encoding the antibody fragment) by antigen binding is accomplished through several rounds of antigen binding and re-amplification, a procedure termed panning. Antibody fragments specific for the antigen are enriched and finally isolated.
[0129] Phage display techniques can also be used in an approach for the humanization of rodent monoclonal antibodies, called “guided selection” (see Jespers, L. S., et al., Bio/Technology 12, 899-903 (1994)). For this, the Fd fragment of the mouse monoclonal antibody can be displayed in combination with a human light chain library, and the resulting hybrid Fab library may then be selected with antigen. The mouse Fd fragment thereby provides a template to guide the selection. Subsequently, the selected human light chains are combined with a human Fd fragment library. Selection of the resulting library yields entirely human Fab.
[0130] A variety of procedures have been described for deriving human antibodies from phage-display libraries (See, for example, Hoogenboom et al., J. Mol. Biol., 227:381 (1991); Marks et al., J. Mol. Biol, 222:581-597 (1991); U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,565,332 and 5,573,905; Clackson, T., and Wells, J. A., TIBTECH 12, 173-184 (1994)). In particular, in vitro selection and evolution of antibodies derived from phage display libraries has become a powerful tool (See Burton, D. R., and Barbas III, C. F., Adv. Immunol. 57, 191-280 (1994); and, Winter, G., et al., Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12, 433-455 (1994); U.S. patent application no. 20020004215 and WO92/01047; U.S. patent application no. 20030190317 published Oct. 9, 2003 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,054,287; U.S. Pat. No. 5,877,293.
[0131] Watkins, “Screening of Phage-Expressed Antibody Libraries by Capture Lift,” Methods in Molecular Biology, Antibody Phage Display: Methods and Protocols 178: 187-193, and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20030044772 published Mar. 6, 2003 describes methods for screening phage-expressed antibody libraries or other binding molecules by capture lift, a method involving immobilization of the candidate binding molecules on a solid support.
[0132] Antibody Fragments
[0133] As noted above, antibody fragments comprise a portion of an intact full length antibody, preferably an antigen binding or variable region of the intact antibody, and include linear antibodies and multispecific antibodies formed from antibody fragments. Nonlimiting examples of antibody fragments include Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)2, Fv, Fd, domain antibody (dAb), complementarity determining region (CDR) fragments, single-chain antibodies (scFv), single chain antibody fragments, maxibodies, diabodies, triabodies, tetrabodies, minibodies, linear antibodies, chelating recombinant antibodies, tribodies or bibodies, intrabodies, nanobodies, small modular immunopharmaceuticals (SMIPs), an antigen-binding-domain immunoglobulin fusion protein, a camelized antibody, a VHH containing antibody, or muteins or derivatives thereof, and polypeptides that contain at least a portion of an immunoglobulin that is sufficient to confer specific antigen binding to the polypeptide, such as a CDR sequence, as long as the antibody retains the desired biological activity. Such antigen fragments may be produced by the modification of whole antibodies or synthesized de novo using recombinant DNA technologies or peptide synthesis.
[0134] The term “diabodies” refers to small antibody fragments with two antigen-binding sites, which fragments comprise a heavy-chain variable domain (VH) connected to a light-chain variable domain (VL) in the same polypeptide chain (VH VL). By using a linker that is too short to allow pairing between the two domains on the same chain, the domains are forced to pair with the complementary domains of another chain and create two antigen-binding sites. Diabodies are described more fully in, for example, EP 404,097; WO 93/11161; and Hollinger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:6444-6448 (1993).
[0135] “Single-chain Fv” or “scFv” antibody fragments comprise the VH and VL domains of antibody, wherein these domains are present in a single polypeptide chain, and optionally comprising a polypeptide linker between the VH and VL domains that enables the Fv to form the desired structure for antigen binding (Bird et al., Science 242:423-426, 1988, and Huston et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5879-5883, 1988). An Fd fragment consists of the VH and CH1 domains.
[0136] Additional antibody fragments include a domain antibody (dAb) fragment (Ward et al., Nature 341:544-546, 1989) which consists of a VH domain.
[0137] “Linear antibodies” comprise a pair of tandem Fd segments (VH-CH1-VH-CH1) which form a pair of antigen binding regions. Linear antibodies can be bispecific or monospecific (Zapata et al. Protein Eng. 8:1057-62 (1995)).
[0138] A “minibody” consisting of scFv fused to CH3 via a peptide linker (hingeless) or via an IgG hinge has been described in Olafsen, et al., Protein Eng Des Sel. 2004 April; 17(4):315-23.
[0139] The term “maxibody” refers to bivalent scFvs covalently attached to the Fc region of an immunoglobulin, see, for example, Fredericks et al, Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, 17:95-106 (2004) and Powers et al., Journal of Immunological Methods, 251:123-135 (2001).
[0140] Functional heavy-chain antibodies devoid of light chains are naturally occurring in certain species of animals, such as nurse sharks, wobbegong sharks and Camelidae, such as camels, dromedaries, alpacas and llamas. The antigen-binding site is reduced to a single domain, the VHH domain, in these animals. These antibodies form antigen-binding regions using only heavy chain variable region, i.e., these functional antibodies are homodimers of heavy chains only having the structure H2L2 (referred to as “heavy-chain antibodies” or “HCAbs”). Camelized VHH reportedly recombines with IgG2 and IgG3 constant regions that contain hinge, CH2, and CH3 domains and lack a CuI domain. Classical VH-only fragments are difficult to produce in soluble form, but improvements in solubility and specific binding can be obtained when framework residues are altered to be more VHH-like. (See, e.g., Reichman, et al., J Immunol Methods 1999, 231:25-38.) Camelized VHH domains have been found to bind to antigen with high affinity (Desmyter et al., J. Biol. Chem. 276:26285-90, 2001) and possess high stability in solution (Ewert et al., Biochemistry 41:3628-36, 2002). Methods for generating antibodies having camelized heavy chains are described in, for example, in U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2005/0136049 and 2005/0037421. Alternative scaffolds can be made from human variable-like domains that more closely match the shark V-NAR scaffold and may provide a framework for a long penetrating loop structure.
[0141] Because the variable domain of the heavy-chain antibodies is the smallest fully functional antigen-binding fragment with a molecular mass of only 15 kDa, this entity is referred to as a nanobody (Cortez-Retamozo et al., Cancer Research 64:2853-57, 2004). A nanobody library may be generated from an immunized dromedary as described in Conrath et al., (Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45: 2807-12, 2001).
[0142] Intrabodies are single chain antibodies which demonstrate intracellular expression and can manipulate intracellular protein function (Biocca, et al., EMBO J. 9:101-108, 1990; Colby et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:17616-21, 2004). Intrabodies, which comprise cell signal sequences which retain the antibody contruct in intracellular regions, may be produced as described in Mhashilkar et al (EMBO J. 14:1542-51, 1995) and Wheeler et al. (FASEB J. 17:1733-5. 2003). Transbodies are cell-permeable antibodies in which a protein transduction domains (PTD) is fused with single chain variable fragment (scFv) antibodies Heng et al., (Med. Hypotheses. 64:1105-8, 2005).
[0143] Further contemplated are antibodies that are SMIPs or binding domain immunoglobulin fusion proteins specific for target protein. These constructs are single-chain polypeptides comprising antigen binding domains fused to immunoglobulin domains necessary to carry out antibody effector functions. See e.g., WO03/041600, U.S. Patent publication 20030133939 and US Patent Publication 20030118592.
[0144] Various techniques have been developed for the production of antibody fragments. Traditionally, these fragments were derived via proteolytic digestion of intact antibodies, but can also be produced directly by recombinant host cells. See, for example, Better et al., Science 240: 1041-1043 (1988); Skerra et al. Science 240: 1038-1041 (1988); Carter et al., Bio/Technology 10:163-167 (1992).
[0145] Multivalent Antibodies
[0146] In some embodiments, it may be desirable to generate multivalent or even a multispecific (e.g. bispecific, trispecific, etc.) monoclonal antibody. Such antibody may have binding specificities for at least two different epitopes of the target antigen, or alternatively it may bind to two different molecules, e.g. to the target antigen and to a cell surface protein or receptor. For example, a bispecific antibody may include an arm that binds to the target and another arm that binds to a triggering molecule on a leukocyte such as a T-cell receptor molecule (e.g., CD2 or CD3), or Fc receptors for IgG (FcγR), such as FcγRI (CD64), FcγRII (CD32) and FcγRIII (CD16) so as to focus cellular defense mechanisms to the target-expressing cell. As another example, bispecific antibodies may be used to localize cytotoxic agents to cells which express target antigen. These antibodies possess a target-binding arm and an arm which binds the cytotoxic agent (e.g., saporin, anti-interferon-60, vinca alkaloid, ricin A chain, methotrexate or radioactive isotope hapten). Multispecific antibodies can be prepared as full length antibodies or antibody fragments.
[0147] Additionally, the anti-Aβ antibodies of the present invention can also be constructed to fold into multivalent forms, which may improve binding affinity, specificity and/or increased half-life in blood. Multivalent forms of anti-Aβ antibodies can be prepared by techniques known in the art.
[0148] Bispecific or multispecific antibodies include cross-linked or “heteroconjugate” antibodies. For example, one of the antibodies in the heteroconjugate can be coupled to avidin, the other to biotin. Heteroconjugate antibodies may be made using any convenient cross-linking methods. Suitable cross-linking agents are well known in the art, and are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,676,980, along with a number of cross-linking techniques. Another method is designed to make tetramers by adding a streptavidin-coding sequence at the C-terminus of the scFv. Streptavidin is composed of four subunits, so when the scFv-streptavidin is folded, four subunits associate to form a tetramer (Kipriyanov et al., Hum Antibodies Hybridomas 6(3): 93-101 (1995), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).
[0149] According to another approach for making bispecific antibodies, the interface between a pair of antibody molecules can be engineered to maximize the percentage of heterodimers which are recovered from recombinant cell culture. One interface comprises at least a part of the CH3 domain of an antibody constant domain. In this method, one or more small amino acid side chains from the interface of the first antibody molecule are replaced with larger side chains (e.g., tyrosine or tryptophan). Compensatory “cavities” of identical or similar size to the large side chain(s) are created on the interface of the second antibody molecule by replacing large amino acid side chains with smaller ones (e.g., alanine or threonine). This provides a mechanism for increasing the yield of the heterodimer over other unwanted end-products such as homodimers. See WO 96/27011 published Sep. 6, 1996.
[0150] Techniques for generating bispecific or multispecific antibodies from antibody fragments have also been described in the literature. For example, bispecific or trispecific antibodies can be prepared using chemical linkage. Brennan et al., Science 229:81 (1985) describe a procedure wherein intact antibodies are proteolytically cleaved to generate F(ab′)2 fragments. These fragments are reduced in the presence of the dithiol complexing agent sodium arsenite to stabilize vicinal dithiols and prevent intermolecular disulfide formation. The Fab′ fragments generated are then converted to thionitrobenzoate (TNB) derivatives. One of the Fab′-TNB derivatives is then reconverted to the Fab′-thiol by reduction with mercaptoethylamine and is mixed with an equimolar amount of the other Fab′-TNB derivative to form the bispecific antibody. The bispecific antibodies produced can be used as agents for the selective immobilization of enzymes. Better et al., Science 240: 1041-1043 (1988) disclose secretion of functional antibody fragments from bacteria (see, e.g., Better et al., Skerra et al. Science 240: 1038-1041 (1988)). For example, Fab′-SH fragments can be directly recovered from E. coli and chemically coupled to form bispecific antibodies (Carter et al., Bio/Technology 10:163-167 (1992); Shalaby et al., J. Exp. Med. 175:217-225 (1992)).
[0151] Shalaby et al., J. Exp. Med. 175:217-225 (1992) describe the production of a fully humanized bispecific antibody F(ab′)2 molecule. Each Fab′ fragment was separately secreted from E. coli and subjected to directed chemical coupling in vitro to form the bispecfic antibody.
[0152] Various techniques for making and isolating bispecific or multispecific antibody fragments directly from recombinant cell culture have also been described. For example, bispecific antibodies have been produced using leucine zippers, e.g. GCN4. (See generally Kostelny et al., J. Immunol. 148(5):1547-1553 (1992).) The leucine zipper peptides from the Fos and Jun proteins were linked to the Fab′ portions of two different antibodies by gene fusion. The antibody homodimers were reduced at the hinge region to form monomers and then re-oxidized to form the antibody heterodimers. This method can also be utilized for the production of antibody homodimers.
[0153] Diabodies, described above, are one example of a bispecific antibody. See, for example, Hollinger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:6444-6448 (1993). Bivalent diabodies can be stabilized by disulfide linkage.
[0154] Stable monospecific or bispecific Fv tetramers can also be generated by noncovalent association in (scFv2)2 configuration or as bis-tetrabodies. Alternatively, two different scFvs can be joined in tandem to form a bis-scFv.
[0155] Another strategy for making bispecific antibody fragments by the use of single-chain Fv (sFv) dimers has also been reported. See Gruber et al., J. Immunol. 152: 5368 (1994). One approach has been to link two scFv antibodies with linkers or disulfide bonds (Mallender and Voss, J. Biol. Chem. 269:199-2061994, WO 94/13806, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,830, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties).
[0156] Alternatively, the bispecific antibody may be a “linear antibody” produced as described in Zapata et al. Protein Eng. 8(10):1057-1062 (1995). Briefly, these antibodies comprise a pair of tandem Fd segments (VH-CH1-VH-CH1) which form a pair of antigen binding regions. Linear antibodies can be bispecific or monospecific.
[0157] Antibodies with more than two valencies are also contemplated. For example, trispecific antibodies can be prepared. (Tutt et al., J. Immunol. 147:60 (1991)).
[0158] A “chelating recombinant antibody” is a bispecific antibody that recognizes adjacent and non-overlapping epitopes of the target antigen, and is flexible enough to bind to both epitopes simultaneously (Neri et al., J Mol Biol. 246:367-73, 1995).
[0159] Production of bispecific Fab-scFv (“bibody”) and trispecific Fab-(scFv)(2) (“tribody”) are described in Schoonjans et al. (J Immunol. 165:7050-57, 2000) and Willems et al. (J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 786:161-76, 2003). For bibodies or tribodies, a scFv molecule is fused to one or both of the VL-CL (L) and VH-CH1 (Fd) chains, e.g., to produce a tribody two scFvs are fused to C-term of Fab while in a bibody one scFv is fused to C-term of Fab.
[0160] In yet another method, dimers, trimers, and tetramers are produced after a free cysteine is introduced in the parental protein. A peptide-based cross linker with variable numbers (two to four) of maleimide groups was used to cross link the protein of interest to the free cysteines (Cochran et al., Immunity 12(3): 241-50 (2000), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety).
[0161] Specific Binding Agents
[0162] Other Aβ-specific binding agents can be prepared, for example, based on CDRs from an antibody or by screening libraries of diverse peptides or organic chemical compounds for peptides or compounds that exhibit the desired binding properties for Aβ. Aβ-specific binding agent include peptides containing amino acid sequences that are at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 81%, at least 82%, at least 83%, at least 84%, at least 85%, at least 86%, at least 87%, at least 88%, at least 89%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99% or more identical to one or more CDRs of human antibody 1.1 (SEQ ID NOs: 5-10); human antibody 1.2 (SEQ ID NOs: 15-20); human antibody 1.7 (SEQ ID NOs: 25-30) or human antibody 1.9 (SEQ ID NOs: 35-40), SEQ ID NOs: 56-61 (Ab 1.14), SEQ ID NOs: 66-71 (Ab 1.15), SEQ ID NOs: 76-81 (Ab 6.18), SEQ ID NOs: 86-91 (Ab 6.27), SEQ ID NOs: 96-101 (Ab 7.2), SEQ ID NOs: 106-111 (Ab 7.11), SEQ ID NOs: 116-121 (Ab 7.28) and SEQ ID NOs: 126-131 (Ab 8.57).
[0163] Aβ-specific binding agents also include peptibodies. The term “peptibody” refers to a molecule comprising an antibody Fc domain attached to at least one peptide. The production of peptibodies is generally described in PCT publication WO 00/24782, published May 4, 2000. Any of these peptides may be linked in tandem (i.e., sequentially), with or without linkers. Peptides containing a cysteinyl residue may be cross-linked with another Cys-containing peptide, either or both of which may be linked to a vehicle. Any peptide having more than one Cys residue may form an intrapeptide disulfide bond, as well. Any of these peptides may be derivatized, for example the carboxyl terminus may be capped with an amino group, cysteines may be cappe, or amino acid residues may substituted by moieties other than amino acid residues (see, e.g., Bhatnagar et al., J. Med. Chem. 39: 3814-9 (1996), and Cuthbertson et al., J. Med. Chem. 40: 2876-82 (1997), which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety). The peptide sequences may be optimized, analogous to affinity maturation for antibodies, or otherwise altered by alanine scanning or random or directed mutagenesis followed by screening to identify the best binders. Lowman, Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 26: 401-24 (1997). Various molecules can be inserted into the specific binding agent structure, e.g., within the peptide portion itself or between the peptide and vehicle portions of the specific binding agents, while retaining the desired activity of specific binding agent. One can readily insert, for example, molecules such as an Fc domain or fragment thereof, polyethylene glycol or other related molecules such as dextran, a fatty acid, a lipid, a cholesterol group, a small carbohydrate, a peptide, a detectable moiety as described herein (including fluorescent agents, radiolabels such as radioisotopes), an oligosaccharide, oligonucleotide, a polynucleotide, interference (or other) RNA, enzymes, hormones, or the like. Other molecules suitable for insertion in this fashion will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, and are encompassed within the scope of the invention. This includes insertion of, for example, a desired molecule in between two consecutive amino acids, optionally joined by a suitable linker.
II. Production of Specific Binding Agent Variants
[0164] Amino acid sequence variants of the desired specific binding agent may be prepared by introducing appropriate nucleotide changes into the encoding DNA, or by peptide synthesis. Such variants include, for example, deletions and/or insertions and/or substitutions of residues within the amino acid sequences of the specific binding agents or antibodies. Any combination of deletion, insertion, and substitution is made to arrive at the final construct, provided that the final construct possesses the desired characteristics. The amino acid changes also may alter post-translational processes of the specific binding agent, such as changing the number or position of glycosylation sites. In certain instances, specific binding agent variants are prepared with the intent to modify those amino acid residues which are directly involved in epitope binding. In other embodiments, modification of residues which are not directly involved in epitope binding or residues not involved in epitope binding in any way, is desirable, for purposes discussed herein. Mutagenesis within any of the CDR regions and/or framework regions is contemplated.
[0165] Nucleic acid molecules encoding amino acid sequence variants of the specific binding agent or antibody are prepared by a variety of methods known in the art. Such methods include oligonucleotide-mediated (or site-directed) mutagenesis, PCR mutagenesis, and cassette mutagenesis of an earlier prepared variant or a non-variant version of the specific binding agent.
[0166] A useful method for identification of certain residues or regions of the specific binding agent that are preferred locations for mutagenesis is called “alanine scanning mutagenesis,” as described by Cunningham and Wells Science, 244:1081-1085 (1989). Here, a residue or group of target residues are identified (e.g., charged residues such as arg, asp, his, lys, and glu) and replaced by a neutral or negatively charged amino acid (most preferably alanine or polyalanine) to affect the interaction of the amino acids with antigen. Those amino acid locations demonstrating functional sensitivity to the substitutions then are refined by introducing further or other variants at, or for, the sites of substitution. Thus, while the site for introducing an amino acid sequence variation is predetermined, the nature of the mutation per se need not be predetermined. For example, to analyze the performance of a mutation at a given site, ala scanning or random mutagenesis is conducted at the target codon or region and the expressed variants are screened for the desired activity.
[0167] Ordinarily, amino acid sequence variants of the specific binding agent will have an amino acid sequence having at least 60% amino acid sequence identity with the original specific binding agent or antibody amino acid sequences of either the heavy or the light chain variable region, or at least 65%, or at least 70%, or at least 75% or at least 80% identity, more preferably at least 85% identity, even more preferably at least 90% identity, and most preferably at least 95% identity, including for example, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, and 100%. Identity or homology with respect to this sequence is defined herein as the percentage of amino acid residues in the candidate sequence that are identical with the original sequence, after aligning the sequences and introducing gaps, if necessary, to achieve the maximum percent sequence identity, and not considering any conservative substitutions (as defined in Table I below) as part of the sequence identity. None of N-terminal, C-terminal, or internal extensions, deletions, or insertions into the specific binding agent or antibody sequence shall be construed as affecting sequence identity or homology. Thus, sequence identity can be determined by standard methods that are commonly used to compare the similarity in position of the amino acids of two polypeptides. Using a computer program such as BLAST or FASTA, two polypeptides are aligned for optimal matching of their respective amino acids (either along the full length of one or both sequences, or along a pre-determined portion of one or both sequences). The programs provide a default opening penalty and a default gap penalty, and a scoring matrix such as PAM 250 [a standard scoring matrix; see Dayhoff et al., in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, vol. 5, supp. 3 (1978)] can be used in conjunction with the computer program. For example, the percent identity can then be calculated as: the total number of identical matches multiplied by 100 and then divided by the sum of the length of the longer sequence within the matched span and the number of gaps introduced into the longer sequences in order to align the two sequences.
[0168] Amino acid sequence insertions include amino- and/or carboxyl-terminal fusions ranging in length from one residue to polypeptides containing a hundred or more residues, as well as intra-sequence insertions of single or multiple amino acid residues. Examples of terminal insertions include a specific binding agent with an N-terminal methionyl residue or the specific binding agent (including antibody or antibody fragment) fused to an epitope tag or a salvage receptor epitope. Other insertional variants of the specific binding agent or antibody molecule include the fusion to a polypeptide which increases the serum half-life of the specific binding agent, e.g. at the N-terminus or C-terminus.
[0169] Examples of epitope tags include the flu HA tag polypeptide and its antibody 12CA5 [Field et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 2159-2165 (1988)]; the c-myc tag and the 8F9, 3C7, 6E10, G4, B7 and 9E10 antibodies thereto [Evan et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 5(12): 3610-3616 (1985)]; and the Herpes Simplex virus glycoprotein D (gD) tag and its antibody [Paborsky et al., Protein Engineering 3(6): 547-553 (1990)]. Other exemplary tags are a poly-histidine sequence, generally around six histidine residues, that permits isolation of a compound so labeled using nickel chelation. Other labels and tags, such as the FLAG® tag (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, N.Y.) are well known and routinely used in the art.
[0170] The term “salvage receptor binding epitope” refers to an epitope of the Fc region of an IgG molecule (e.g., IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, or IgG4) that is responsible for increasing the in vivo serum half-life of the IgG molecule.
[0171] Another type of variant is an amino acid substitution variant. These variants have at least one amino acid residue in the specific binding agent molecule removed and a different residue inserted in its place. Substitutional mutagenesis within any of the hypervariable or CDR regions or framework regions is contemplated. Conservative substitutions are shown in Table 1. The most conservative substitution is found under the heading of “preferred substitutions”. If such substitutions result in no change in biological activity, then more substantial changes, denominated “exemplary substitutions” in Table 1, or as further described below in reference to amino acid classes, may be introduced and the products screened.
[0172]
| TABLE 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Preferred Residue | |||
| Original | Exemplary | Substitutions | |
| Ala (A) | val; leu; ile | val | |
| Arg (R) | lys; gln; asn | lys | |
| Asn (N) | gln; his; asp, lys; gln | arg | |
| Asp (D) | glu; asn | glu | |
| Cys (C) | ser; ala | ser | |
| Gln (Q) | asn; glu | asn | |
| Glu (E) | asp; gln | asp | |
| Gly (G) | ala | ||
| His (H) | asn; gln; lys; arg | ||
| Ile (I) | leu; val; met; ala; | leu | |
| phe; | norleucine | ||
| Leu (L) | norleucine; ile; val; | ile | |
| met; ala; phe | |||
| Lys (K) | arg; gln; asn | arg | |
| Met (M) | leu; phe; ile | leu | |
| Phe (F) | leu; val; ile; ala; tyr | ||
| Pro (P) | ala | ||
| Ser (S) | thr | ||
| Thr (T) | ser | ser | |
| Trp (W) | tyr; phe | tyr | |
| Tyr (Y) | trp; phe; thr; ser | phe | |
| Val (V) | ile; leu; met; phe; | leu | |
| ala; norleucine | |||
[0173] Substantial modifications in the biological properties of the specific binding agent are accomplished by selecting substitutions that differ significantly in their effect on maintaining (a) the structure of the polypeptide backbone in the area of the substitution, for example, as a sheet or helical conformation, (b) the charge or hydrophobicity of the molecule at the target site, or (c) the bulk of the side chain. Naturally occurring residues are divided into groups based on common side-chain properties:
[0174] (1) hydrophobic: norleucine, met, ala, val, leu, ile;
[0175] (2) neutral hydrophilic: cys, ser, thr;
[0176] (3) acidic: asp, glu;
[0177] (4) basic: asn, gln, his, lys, arg;
[0178] (5) residues that influence chain orientation: gly, pro; and
[0179] (6) aromatic: trp, tyr, phe.
[0180] Conservative substitutions involve replacing an amino acid with another member of its class. Non-conservative substitutions involve replacing a member of one of these classes with a member of another class.
[0181] Any cysteine residue not involved in maintaining the proper conformation of the specific binding agent also may be substituted, generally with serine, to improve the oxidative stability of the molecule and prevent aberrant crosslinking. Conversely, cysteine bond(s) may be added to the specific binding agent to improve its stability (particularly where the specific binding agent is an antibody fragment such as an Fv fragment).
[0182] In certain instances, specific binding agent variants are prepared with the intent to modify those amino acid residues which are directly involved in epitope binding. In other embodiments, modification of residues which are not directly involved in epitope binding or residues not involved in epitope binding in any way, is desirable, for purposes discussed herein. Mutagenesis within any of the CDR regions and/or framework regions is contemplated.
[0183] In order to determine which specific binding agent amino acid residues are important for epitope recognition and binding, alanine scanning mutagenesis can be performed to produce substitution variants. See, for example, Cunningham et al., Science, 244:1081-1085 (1989), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In this method, individual amino acid residues are replaced one-at-a-time with an alanine residue and the resulting anti-Aβ specific binding agent is screened for its ability to bind its specific epitope relative to the unmodified polypeptide. Modified specific binding agents with reduced binding capacity are sequenced to determine which residue was changed, indicating its significance in binding or biological properties.
[0184] Substitution variants of specific binding agents can be prepared by affinity maturation wherein random amino acid changes are introduced into the parent polypeptide sequence. See, for example, Ouwehand et al., Vox Sang 74 (Suppl 2):223-232, 1998; Rader et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:8910-8915, 1998; Dall'Acqua et al., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8:443-450, 1998, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Affinity maturation involves preparing and screening the anti-Aβ specific binding agents, or variants thereof and selecting from the resulting variants those that have modified biological properties, such as increased binding affinity relative to the parent anti-Aβ specific binding agent. A convenient way for generating substitutional variants is affinity maturation using phage display. Briefly, several hypervariable region sites are mutated to generate all possible amino substitutions at each site. The variants thus generated are expressed in a monovalent fashion on the surface of filamentous phage particles as fusions to the gene III product of M13 packaged within each particle. The phage-displayed variants are then screened for their biological activity (e.g., binding affinity). See e.g., WO 92/01047, WO 93/112366, WO 95/15388 and WO 93/19172.
[0185] Current antibody affinity maturation methods belong to two mutagenesis categories: stochastic and nonstochastic. Error prone PCR, mutator bacterial strains (Low et al., J. Mol. Biol. 260, 359-68, 1996), and saturation mutagenesis (Nishimiya et al., J. Biol. Chem. 275:12813-20, 2000; Chowdhury, P. S. Methods Mol. Biol. 178, 269-85, 2002) are typical examples of stochastic mutagenesis methods (Rajpal et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:8466-71, 2005). Nonstochastic techniques often use alanine-scanning or site-directed mutagenesis to generate limited collections of specific muteins. Some methods are described in further detail below.
[0186] Affinity maturation via panning methods—Affinity maturation of recombinant antibodies is commonly performed through several rounds of panning of candidate antibodies in the presence of decreasing amounts of antigen. Decreasing the amount of antigen per round selects the antibodies with the highest affinity to the antigen thereby yielding antibodies of high affinity from a large pool of starting material. Affinity maturation via panning is well known in the art and is described, for example, in Huls et al. (Cancer Immunol Immunother. 50:163-71, 2001). Methods of affinity maturation using phage display technologies are described elsewhere herein and known in the art (see e.g., Daugherty et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:2029-34, 2000).
[0187] Look-through mutagenesis—Look-through mutagenesis (LTM) (Rajpal et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:8466-71, 2005) provides a method for rapidly mapping the antibody-binding site. For LTM, nine amino acids, representative of the major side-chain chemistries provided by the 20 natural amino acids, are selected to dissect the functional side-chain contributions to binding at every position in all six CDRs of an antibody. LTM generates a positional series of single mutations within a CDR where each “wild type” residue is systematically substituted by one of nine selected amino acids. Mutated CDRs are combined to generate combinatorial single-chain variable fragment (scFv) libraries of increasing complexity and size without becoming prohibitive to the quantitative display of all muteins. After positive selection, clones with improved binding are sequenced, and beneficial mutations are mapped.
[0188] Error-prone PCR—Error-prone PCR involves the randomization of nucleic acids between different selection rounds. The randomization occurs at a low rate by the intrinsic error rate of the polymerase used but can be enhanced by error-prone PCR (Zaccolo et al., J. Mol. Biol. 285:775-783, 1999) using a polymerase having a high intrinsic error rate during transcription (Hawkins et al., J Mol. Biol. 226:889-96, 1992). After the mutation cycles, clones with improved affinity for the antigen are selected using routine methods in the art.
[0189] Techniques utilizing gene shuffling and directed evolution may also be used to prepare and screen anti-Aβ specific binding agents, or variants thereof, for desired activity. For example, Jermutus et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA., 98(1):75-80 (2001) showed that tailored in vitro selection strategies based on ribosome display were combined with in vitro diversification by DNA shuffling to evolve either the off-rate or thermodynamic stability of scFvs; Fermer et al., Tumour Biol. 2004 January-April; 25(1-2):7-13 reported that use of phage display in combination with DNA shuffling raised affinity by almost three orders of magnitude. Dougherty et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000 Feb. 29; 97(5):2029-2034 reported that (i) functional clones occur at an unexpectedly high frequency in hypermutated libraries, (ii) gain-of-function mutants are well represented in such libraries, and (iii) the majority of the scFv mutations leading to higher affinity correspond to residues distant from the binding site.
[0190] Alternatively, or in addition, it may be beneficial to analyze a crystal structure of the antigen-antibody complex to identify contact points between the antibody and antigen, or to use computer software to model such contact points. Such contact residues and neighboring residues are candidates for substitution according to the techniques elaborated herein. Once such variants are generated, they are subjected to screening as described herein and antibodies with superior properties in one or more relevant assays may be selected for further development.
[0191] Specific Binding Agents with Modified Carbohydrate
[0192] Specific binding agent variants can also be produced that have a modified glycosylation pattern relative to the parent polypeptide, for example, adding or deleting one or more of the carbohydrate moieties bound to the specific binding agent, and/or adding or deleting one or more glycosylation sites in the specific binding agent.
[0193] Glycosylation of polypeptides, including antibodies is typically either N-linked or O-linked. N-linked refers to the attachment of the carbohydrate moiety to the side chain of an asparagine residue. The tripeptide sequences asparagine-X-serine and asparagine-X-threonine, where X is any amino acid except proline, are the recognition sequences for enzymatic attachment of the carbohydrate moiety to the asparagine side chain. The presence of either of these tripeptide sequences in a polypeptide creates a potential glycosylation site. Thus, N-linked glycosylation sites may be added to a specific binding agent by altering the amino acid sequence such that it contains one or more of these tripeptide sequences. O-linked glycosylation refers to the attachment of one of the sugars N-aceylgalactosamine, galactose, or xylose to a hydroxyamino acid, most commonly serine or threonine, although 5-hydroxyproline or 5-hydroxylysine may also be used. O-linked glycosylation sites may be added to a specific binding agent by inserting or substituting one or more serine or threonine residues to the sequence of the original specific binding agent or antibody.
[0194] Altered Effector Function
[0195] Cysteine residue(s) may be removed or introduced in the Fc region of an antibody or Fc-containing polypeptide, thereby eliminating or increasing interchain disulfide bond formation in this region. A homodimeric specific binding agent thus generated may have improved internalization capability and/or increased complement-mediated cell killing and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). See Caron et al., J. Exp Med. 176: 1191-1195 (1992) and Shopes, B. J. Immunol. 148: 2918-2922 (1992). Homodimeric specific binding agents or antibodies may also be prepared using heterobifunctional cross-linkers as described in Wolff et al., Cancer Research 53: 2560-2565 (1993). Alternatively, a specific binding agent can be engineered which has dual Fc regions and may thereby have enhanced complement lysis and ADCC capabilities. See Stevenson et al., Anti-Cancer Drug Design 3: 219-230 (1989).
[0196] It has been shown that sequences within the CDR can cause an antibody to bind to MHC Class II and trigger an unwanted helper T-cell response. A conservative substitution can allow the specific binding agent to retain binding activity yet reduce its ability to trigger an unwanted T-cell response. It is also contemplated that one or more of the N-terminal 20 amino acids of the heavy or light chain are removed.
[0197] Modifications to increase serum half-life also may desirable, for example, by incorporation of or addition of a salvage receptor binding epitope (e.g., by mutation of the appropriate region or by incorporating the epitope into a peptide tag that is then fused to the specific binding agent at either end or in the middle, e.g., by DNA or peptide synthesis) (see, e.g., WO96/32478) or adding molecules such as PEG or other water soluble polymers, including polysaccharide polymers.
[0198] The salvage receptor binding epitope preferably constitutes a region wherein any one or more amino acid residues from one or two loops of a Fc domain are transferred to an analogous position of the specific binding agent or fragment. Even more preferably, three or more residues from one or two loops of the Fc domain are transferred. Still more preferred, the epitope is taken from the CH2 domain of the Fc region (e.g., of an IgG) and transferred to the CH1, CH3, or VH region, or more than one such region, of the specific binding agent or antibody. Alternatively, the epitope is taken from the CH2 domain of the Fc region and transferred to the CL region or VL region, or both, of the specific binding agent fragment. See also International applications WO 97/34631 and WO 96/32478 which describe Fc variants and their interaction with the salvage receptor.
[0199] Other sites and amino acid residue(s) of the constant region have been identified that are responsible for complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), such as the C1q binding site, and/or the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) [see, e.g., Molec. Immunol. 29 (5): 633-9 (1992); Shields et al., J. Biol. Chem., 276(9):6591-6604 (2001); Lazar et al., Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. 103(11): 4005 (2006) which describe the effect of mutations at specific positions, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety]. Mutation of residues within Fc receptor binding sites can result in altered (i.e. increased or decreased) effector function, such as altered affinity for Fc receptors, altered ADCC or CDC activity, or altered half-life. As described above, potential mutations include insertion, deletion or substitution of one or more residues, including substitution with alanine, a conservative substitution, a non-conservative substitution, or replacement with a corresponding amino acid residue at the same position from a different subclass (e.g. replacing an IgG1 residue with a corresponding IgG2 residue at that position).
[0200] The invention also contemplates production of specific binding agent molecules, including antibodies) with altered carbohydrate structure resulting in altered effector activity, including antibody molecules with absent or reduced fucosylation that exhibit improved ADCC activity. A variety of ways are known in the art to accomplish this. For example, ADCC effector activity is mediated by binding of the antibody molecule to the FcγRIII receptor, which has been shown to be dependent on the carbohydrate structure of the N-linked glycosylation at the Asn-297 of the CH2 domain. Non-fucosylated antibodies bind this receptor with increased affinity and trigger FcγRIII-mediated effector functions more efficiently than native, fucosylated antibodies. For example, recombinant production of non-fucosylated antibody in CHO cells in which the alpha-1,6-fucosyl transferase enzyme has been knocked out results in antibody with 100-fold increased ADCC activity (Yamane-Ohnuki et al., Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Sep. 5; 87(5):614-22). Similar effects can be accomplished through decreasing the activity of this or other enzymes in the fucosylation pathway, e.g., through siRNA or antisense RNA treatment, engineering cell lines to knockout the enzyme(s), or culturing with selective glycosylation inhibitors (Rothman et al., Mol. Immunol. 1989 December; 26(12):1113-23). Some host cell strains, e.g. Lec13 or rat hybridoma YB2/0 cell line naturally produce antibodies with lower fucosylation levels. Shields et al., J Biol. Chem. 2002 Jul. 26; 277(30):26733-40; Shinkawa et al., J Biol. Chem. 2003 Jan. 31; 278(5):3466-73. An increase in the level of bisected carbohydrate, e.g. through recombinantly producing antibody in cells that overexpress GnTIII enzyme, has also been determined to increase ADCC activity. Umana et al., Nat Biotechnol. 1999 February; 17(2):176-80. It has been predicted that the absence of only one of the two fucose residues may be sufficient to increase ADCC activity. (Ferrara et al., J Biol. Chem. 2005 Dec. 5).
[0201] Other Covalent Modifications
[0202] Covalent modifications of a specific binding agent, are also included within the scope of this invention. They may be made by chemical synthesis or by enzymatic or chemical cleavage of the specific binding agent or antibody, if applicable. Other types of covalent modifications can be introduced by reacting targeted amino acid residues with an organic derivatizing agent that is capable of reacting with selected side chains or the N- or C-terminal residues.
[0203] Cysteinyl residues most commonly are reacted with α-haloacetates (and corresponding amines), such as chloroacetic acid or chloroacetamide, to give carboxymethyl or carboxyamidomethyl derivatives. Cysteinyl residues also are derivatized by reaction with bromotrifluoroacetone, .alpha.-bromo-β-(5-imidozoyl)propionic acid, chloroacetyl phosphate, N-alkylmaleimides, 3-nitro-2-pyridyl disulfide, methyl 2-pyridyl disulfide, p-chloromercuribenzoate, 2-chloromercuri-4-nitrophenol, or chloro-7-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole.
[0204] Histidyl residues are derivatized by reaction with diethylpyrocarbonate at pH 5.5-7.0 because this agent is relatively specific for the histidyl side chain. Para-bromophenacyl bromide also is useful; the reaction is preferably performed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate at pH 6.0.
[0205] Lysinyl and amino-terminal residues are reacted with succinic or other carboxylic acid anhydrides. Derivatization with these agents has the effect of reversing the charge of the lysinyl residues. Other suitable reagents for derivatizing .alpha.-amino-containing residues include imidoesters such as methyl picolinimidate, pyridoxal phosphate, pyridoxal, chloroborohydride, trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid, O-methylisourea, 2,4-pentanedione, and transaminase-catalyzed reaction with glyoxylate.
[0206] Arginyl residues are modified by reaction with one or several conventional reagents, among them phenylglyoxal, 2,3-butanedione, 1,2-cyclohexanedione, and ninhydrin. Derivatization of arginine residues requires that the reaction be performed in alkaline conditions because of the high pKa of the guanidine functional group. Furthermore, these reagents may react with the groups of lysine as well as the arginine epsilon-amino group.
[0207] The specific modification of tyrosyl residues may be made, with particular interest in introducing spectral labels into tyrosyl residues by reaction with aromatic diazonium compounds or tetranitromethane. Most commonly, N-acetylimidizole and tetranitromethane are used to form O-acetyl tyrosyl species and 3-nitro derivatives, respectively. Tyrosyl residues are iodinated using 125I or 131I to prepare labeled proteins for use in radioimmunoassay.
[0208] Carboxyl side groups (aspartyl or glutamyl) are selectively modified by reaction with carbodiimides (R—N.dbd.C.dbd.N—R′), where R and R′ are different alkyl groups, such as 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinyl-4-ethyl)carbodiimide or 1-ethyl-3-(4-azonia-4,4-dimethylpentyl)carbodiimide. Furthermore, aspartyl and glutamyl residues are converted to asparaginyl and glutaminyl residues by reaction with ammonium ions.
[0209] Glutaminyl and asparaginyl residues are frequently deamidated to the corresponding glutamyl and aspartyl residues, respectively. These residues are deamidated under neutral or basic conditions. The deamidated form of these residues falls within the scope of this invention.
[0210] Other modifications include hydroxylation of proline and lysine, phosphorylation of hydroxyl groups of seryl or threonyl residues, methylation of the .alpha.-amino groups of lysine, arginine, and histidine side chains (T. E. Creighton, Proteins: Structure and Molecular Properties, W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, pp. 79-86 (1983)), acetylation of the N-terminal amine, and amidation of any C-terminal carboxyl group.
[0211] Another type of covalent modification involves chemically or enzymatically coupling glycosides to the specific binding agent or antibody. These procedures are advantageous in that they do not require production of the specific binding agent in a host cell that has glycosylation capabilities for N- or O-linked glycosylation. Depending on the coupling mode used, the sugar(s) may be attached to (a) arginine and histidine, (b) free carboxyl groups, (c) free sulfhydryl groups such as those of cysteine, (d) free hydroxyl groups such as those of serine, threonine, or hydroxyproline, (e) aromatic residues such as those of phenylalanine, tyrosine, or tryptophan, or (f) the amide group of glutamine. These methods are described in WO87/05330 published 11 Sep. 1987, and in Aplin and Wriston, CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem., pp. 259-306 (1981).
[0212] Removal of any carbohydrate moieties present on the specific binding agent may be accomplished chemically or enzymatically. Chemical deglycosylation requires exposure of the specific binding agent to the compound trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, or an equivalent compound. This treatment results in the cleavage of most or all sugars except the linking sugar (N-acetylglucosamine or N-acetylgalactosamine), while leaving the specific binding agent intact. Chemical deglycosylation is described by Hakimuddin, et al. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 259: 52 (1987) and by Edge et al. Anal. Biochem., 118: 131 (1981). Enzymatic cleavage of carbohydrate moieties on a specific binding agent can be achieved by the use of a variety of endo- and exo-glycosidases as described by Thotakura et al. Meth. Enzymol. 138: 350 (1987).
[0213] Another type of covalent modification of the specific binding agents of the invention (including anti-Aβ antibodies) comprises linking the specific binding agent to one of a variety of nonproteinaceous polymers, e.g., polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, polyoxyethylated polyols, polyoxyethylated sorbitol, polyoxyethylated glucose, polyoxyethylated glycerol, polyoxyalkylenes, or polysaccharide polymers such as dextran. Such methods are known in the art, see, e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,640,835; 4,496,689; 4,301,144; 4,670,417; 4,791,192, 4,179,337, 4,766,106, 4,179,337, 4,495,285, 4,609,546 or EP 315 456.
III. Gene Therapy
[0214] Delivery of a therapeutic specific binding agent to appropriate cells can be effected via gene therapy ex vivo, in situ, or in vivo by use of any suitable approach known in the art. For example, for in vivo therapy, a nucleic acid encoding the desired specific binding agent or antibody, either alone or in conjunction with a vector, liposome, or precipitate may be injected directly into the subject, and in some embodiments, may be injected at the site where the expression of the specific binding agent compound is desired. For ex vivo treatment, the subject's cells are removed, the nucleic acid is introduced into these cells, and the modified cells are returned to the subject either directly or, for example, encapsulated within porous membranes which are implanted into the patient. See, e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,892,538 and 5,283,187.
[0215] There are a variety of techniques available for introducing nucleic acids into viable cells. The techniques vary depending upon whether the nucleic acid is transferred into cultured cells in vitro, or in vivo in the cells of the intended host. Techniques suitable for the transfer of nucleic acid into mammalian cells in vitro include the use of liposomes, electroporation, microinjection, cell fusion, chemical treatments, DEAE-dextran, and calcium phosphate precipitation. Other in vivo nucleic acid transfer techniques include transfection with viral vectors (such as adenovirus, Herpes simplex I virus, adeno-associated virus or retrovirus) and lipid-based systems. The nucleic acid and transfection agent are optionally associated with a microparticle. Exemplary transfection agents include calcium phosphate or calcium chloride co-precipitation, DEAE-dextran-mediated transfection, quaternary ammonium amphiphile DOTMA ((dioleoyloxypropyl) trimethylammonium bromide, commercialized as Lipofectin by GIBCO-BRL)) (Felgner et al, (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7413-7417; Malone et al. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 6077-6081); lipophilic glutamate diesters with pendent trimethylammonium heads (Ito et al. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1023, 124-132); the metabolizable parent lipids such as the cationic lipid dioctadecylamido glycylspermine (DOGS, Transfectam, Promega) and dipalmitoylphosphatidyl ethanolamylspermine (DPPES) (J. P. Behr (1986) Tetrahedron Lett. 27, 5861-5864; J. P. Behr et al. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 6982-6986); metabolizable quaternary ammonium salts (DOTB, N-(1-[2,3-dioleoyloxy]propyl)-N,N,N-trimethylammonium methylsulfate (DOTAP)(Boehringer Mannheim), polyethyleneimine (PEI), dioleoyl esters, ChoTB, ChoSC, DOSC)(Leventis et al. (1990) Biochim. Inter. 22, 235-241); 3beta[N—(N′,N′-dimethylaminoethane)-carbamoyl]cholesterol (DC-Chol), dioleoylphosphatidyl ethanolamine (DOPE)/3beta[N—(N′,N′-dimethylaminoethane)-carbamoyl]cholesterolDC-Chol in one to one mixtures (Gao et al., (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1065, 8-14), spermine, spermidine, lipopolyamines (Behr et al., Bioconjugate Chem, 1994, 5: 382-389), lipophilic polylysines (LPLL) (Zhou et al., (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 939, 8-18), [[(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutypere-soxy]ethoxy]ethyl]dimethylbenzylammonium hydroxide (DEBDA hydroxide) with excess phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol (Ballas et al., (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 939, 8-18), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)/DOPE mixtures (Pinnaduwage et al, (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 985, 33-37), lipophilic diester of glutamic acid (TMAG) with DOPE, CTAB, DEBDA, didodecylammonium bromide (DDAB), and stearylamine in admixture with phosphatidylethanolamine (Rose et al., (1991) Biotechnique 10, 520-525), DDAB/DOPE (TransfectACE, GIBCO BRL), and oligogalactose bearing lipids. Exemplary transfection enhancer agents that increase the efficiency of transfer include, for example, DEAE-dextran, polybrene, lysosome-disruptive peptide (Ohmori N I et al, Biochem Biophys Res Commun Jun. 27, 1997; 235(3):726-9), chondroitan-based proteoglycans, sulfated proteoglycans, polyethylenimine, polylysine (Pollard H et al. J Biol Chem, 1998 273 (13):7507-11), integrin-binding peptide CYGGRGDTP, linear dextran nonasaccharide, glycerol, cholesteryl groups tethered at the 3′-terminal internucleoside link of an oligonucleotide (Letsinger, R. L. 1989 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: (17):6553-6), lysophosphatide, lysophosphatidylcholine, lysophosphatidylethanolamine, and 1-oleoyl lysophosphatidylcholine.
[0216] In some situations it may be desirable to deliver the nucleic acid with an agent that directs the nucleic acid-containing vector to target cells. Such “targeting” molecules include specific binding agents specific for a cell-surface membrane protein on the target cell, or a ligand for a receptor on the target cell. Where liposomes are employed, proteins which bind to a cell-surface membrane protein associated with endocytosis may be used for targeting and/or to facilitate uptake. Examples of such proteins include capsid proteins and fragments thereof tropic for a particular cell type, specific binding agents for proteins which undergo internalization in cycling, and proteins that target intracellular localization and enhance intracellular half-life. In other embodiments, receptor-mediated endocytosis can be used. Such methods are described, for example, in Wu et al., 1987 or Wagner et al., 1990. For review of the currently known gene marking and gene therapy protocols, see Anderson 1992. See also WO 93/25673 and the references cited therein. For additional reviews of gene therapy technology, see Friedmann, Science, 244: 1275-1281 (1989); Anderson, Nature, supplement to vol. 392, no 6679, pp. 25-30 (1998); Verma, Scientific American: 68-84 (1990); and Miller, Nature, 357: 455460 (1992).
IV. Administration and Preparation of Pharmaceutical Formulations
[0217] The anti-Aβ specific binding agents or antibodies used in the practice of a method of the invention may be formulated into pharmaceutical compositions and medicaments comprising a carrier suitable for the desired delivery method. Suitable carriers include any material which, when combined with the anti-Aβ specific binding agent or antibody, retains the high-affinity binding of Aβ and is nonreactive with the subject's immune systems. Examples include, but are not limited to, any of a number of standard pharmaceutical carriers such as sterile phosphate buffered saline solutions, bacteriostatic water, and the like. A variety of aqueous carriers may be used, e.g., water, buffered water, 0.4% saline, 0.3% glycine and the like, and may include other proteins for enhanced stability, such as albumin, lipoprotein, globulin, etc., subjected to mild chemical modifications or the like.
[0218] Exemplary specific binding agent concentrations in the formulation may range from about 0.1 mg/ml to about 180 mg/ml or from about 0.1 mg/mL to about 50 mg/mL, or from about 0.5 mg/mL to about 25 mg/mL, or alternatively from about 2 mg/mL to about 10 mg/mL. An aqueous formulation of the specific binding agent may be prepared in a pH-buffered solution, for example, at pH ranging from about 4.5 to about 6.5, or from about 4.8 to about 5.5, or alternatively about 5.0. Examples of buffers that are suitable for a pH within this range include acetate (e.g. sodium acetate), succinate (such as sodium succinate), gluconate, histidine, citrate and other organic acid buffers. The buffer concentration can be from about 1 mM to about 200 mM, or from about 10 mM to about 60 mM, depending, for example, on the buffer and the desired isotonicity of the formulation.
[0219] A tonicity agent, which may also stabilize the specific binding agent, may be included in the formulation. Exemplary tonicity agents include polyols, such as mannitol, sucrose or trehalose. Preferably the aqueous formulation is isotonic, although hypertonic or hypotonic solutions may be suitable. Exemplary concentrations of the polyol in the formulation may range from about 1% to about 15% w/v.
[0220] A surfactant may also be added to the specific binding agent formulation to reduce aggregation of the formulated specific binding agent and/or minimize the formation of particulates in the formulation and/or reduce adsorption. Exemplary surfactants include nonionic surfactants such as polysorbates (e.g. polysorbate 20, or polysorbate 80) or poloxamers (e.g. poloxamer 188). Exemplary concentrations of surfactant may range from about 0.001% to about 0.5%, or from about 0.005% to about 0.2%, or alternatively from about 0.004% to about 0.01% w/v.
[0221] In one embodiment, the formulation contains the above-identified agents (i.e. specific binding agent, buffer, polyol and surfactant) and is essentially free of one or more preservatives, such as benzyl alcohol, phenol, m-cresol, chlorobutanol and benzethonium Cl. In another embodiment, a preservative may be included in the formulation, e.g., at concentrations ranging from about 0.1% to about 2%, or alternatively from about 0.5% to about 1%. One or more other pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, excipients or stabilizers such as those described in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences 16th edition, Osol, A. Ed. (1980) may be included in the formulation provided that they do not adversely affect the desired characteristics of the formulation. Acceptable carriers, excipients or stabilizers are nontoxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed and include; additional buffering agents; co-solvents; antoxidants including ascorbic acid and methionine; chelating agents such as EDTA; metal complexes (e.g. Zn-protein complexes); biodegradable polymers such as polyesters; and/or salt-forming counterions such as sodium.
[0222] Therapeutic formulations of the specific binding agent are prepared for storage by mixing the specific binding agent having the desired degree of purity with optional physiologically acceptable carriers, excipients or stabilizers (Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences 16th edition, Osol, A. Ed. (1980)), in the form of lyophilized formulations or aqueous solutions. Acceptable carriers, excipients, or stabilizers are nontoxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed, and include buffers such as phosphate, citrate, and other organic acids; antioxidants including ascorbic acid and methionine; preservatives (such as octadecyldimethylbenzyl ammonium chloride; hexamethonium chloride; benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride; phenol, butyl or benzyl alcohol; alkyl parabens such as methyl or propyl paraben; catechol; resorcinol; cyclohexanol; 3-pentanol; and m-cresol); low molecular weight (less than about 10 residues) polypeptides; proteins, such as serum albumin, gelatin, or immunoglobulins; hydrophilic polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone; amino acids such as glycine, glutamine, asparagine, histidine, arginine, or lysine; monosaccharides, disaccharides, and other carbohydrates including glucose, mannose, maltose, or dextrins; chelating agents such as EDTA; sugars such as sucrose, mannitol, trehalose or sorbitol; salt-forming counter-ions such as sodium; metal complexes (e.g., Zn-protein complexes); and/or non-ionic surfactants such as TWEEN™, PLURONICS™ or polyethylene glycol (PEG).
[0223] In one embodiment, a suitable formulation of the claimed invention contains an isotonic buffer such as a phosphate, acetate, or TRIS buffer in combination with a tonicity agent such as a polyol, Sorbitol, sucrose or sodium chloride which tonicifies and stabilizes. One example of such a tonicity agent is 5% Sorbitol or sucrose. In addition, the formulation could optionally include a surfactant such as to prevent aggregation and for stabilization at 0.01 to 0.02% wt/vol. The pH of the formulation may range from 4.5-6.5 or 4.5 to 5.5. Other exemplary descriptions of pharmaceutical formulations for antibodies may be found in US 2003/0113316 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,171,586, each incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0224] The formulation herein may also contain more than one active compound as necessary for the particular indication being treated, preferably those with complementary activities that do not adversely affect each other. For example, it may be desirable to further provide an immunosuppressive agent. Such molecules are suitably present in combination in amounts that are effective for the purpose intended.
[0225] The active ingredients may also be entrapped in microcapsule prepared, for example, by coacervation techniques or by interfacial polymerization, for example, hydroxymethylcellulose or gelatin-microcapsule and poly-(methylmethacylate) microcapsule, respectively, in colloidal drug delivery systems (for example, liposomes, albumin microspheres, microemulsions, nano-particles and nanocapsules) or in macroemulsions. Such techniques are disclosed in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences 16th edition, Osol, A. Ed. (1980).
[0226] Suspensions and crystal forms of specific binding agents are also contemplated. Methods to make suspensions and crystal forms are known to one of skill in the art.
[0227] The formulations to be used for in vivo administration must be sterile. The compositions of the invention may be sterilized by conventional, well known sterilization techniques. For example, sterilization is readily accomplished by filtration through sterile filtration membranes. The resulting solutions may be packaged for use or filtered under aseptic conditions and lyophilized, the lyophilized preparation being combined with a sterile solution prior to administration.
[0228] The process of freeze-drying is often employed to stabilize polypeptides for long-term storage, particularly when the polypeptide is relatively unstable in liquid compositions. A lyophilization cycle is usually composed of three steps: freezing, primary drying, and secondary drying; Williams and Polli, Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology, Volume 38, Number 2, pages 48-59 (1984). In the freezing step, the solution is cooled until it is adequately frozen. Bulk water in the solution forms ice at this stage. The ice sublimes in the primary drying stage, which is conducted by reducing chamber pressure below the vapor pressure of the ice, using a vacuum. Finally, sorbed or bound water is removed at the secondary drying stage under reduced chamber pressure and an elevated shelf temperature. The process produces a material known as a lyophilized cake. Thereafter the cake can be reconstituted prior to use.
[0229] The standard reconstitution practice for lyophilized material is to add back a volume of pure water (typically equivalent to the volume removed during lyophilization), although dilute solutions of antibacterial agents are sometimes used in the production of pharmaceuticals for parenteral administration; Chen, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, Volume 18, Numbers 11 and 12, pages 1311-1354 (1992).
[0230] Excipients have been noted in some cases to act as stabilizers for freeze-dried products; Carpenter et al., Developments in Biological Standardization, Volume 74, pages 225-239 (1991). For example, known excipients include polyols (including mannitol, sorbitol and glycerol); sugars (including glucose and sucrose); and amino acids (including alanine, glycine and glutamic acid).
[0231] In addition, polyols and sugars are also often used to protect polypeptides from freezing and drying-induced damage and to enhance the stability during storage in the dried state. In general, sugars, in particular disaccharides, are effective in both the freeze-drying process and during storage. Other classes of molecules, including mono- and di-saccharides and polymers such as PVP, have also been reported as stabilizers of lyophilized products.
[0232] For injection, the pharmaceutical formulation and/or medicament may be a powder suitable for reconstitution with an appropriate solution as described above. Examples of these include, but are not limited to, freeze dried, rotary dried or spray dried powders, amorphous powders, granules, precipitates, or particulates. For injection, the formulations may optionally contain stabilizers, pH modifiers, surfactants, bioavailability modifiers and combinations of these.
[0233] Sustained-release preparations may be prepared. Suitable examples of sustained-release preparations include semipermeable matrices of solid hydrophobic polymers containing the specific binding agent, which matrices are in the form of shaped articles, e.g., films, or microcapsule. Examples of sustained-release matrices include polyesters, hydrogels (for example, poly(2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate), or poly(vinylalcohol)), polylactides (U.S. Pat. No. 3,773,919), copolymers of L-glutamic acid and y ethyl-L-glutamate, non-degradable ethylene-vinyl acetate, degradable lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymers such as the Lupron Depot™ (injectable microspheres composed of lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer and leuprolide acetate), and poly-D-(−)-3-hydroxybutyric acid. While polymers such as ethylene-vinyl acetate and lactic acid-glycolic acid enable release of molecules for over 100 days, certain hydrogels release proteins for shorter time periods. When encapsulated polypeptides remain in the body for a long time, they may denature or aggregate as a result of exposure to moisture at 37° C., resulting in a loss of biological activity and possible changes in immunogenicity. Rational strategies can be devised for stabilization depending on the mechanism involved. For example, if the aggregation mechanism is discovered to be intermolecular S—S bond formation through thio-disulfide interchange, stabilization may be achieved by modifying sulfhydryl residues, lyophilizing from acidic solutions, controlling moisture content, using appropriate additives, and developing specific polymer matrix compositions.
[0234] The formulations of the invention may be designed to be short-acting, fast-releasing, long-acting, or sustained-releasing as described herein. Thus, the pharmaceutical formulations may also be formulated for controlled release or for slow release.
[0235] Specific dosages may be adjusted depending on conditions of disease, the age, body weight, general health conditions, sex, and diet of the subject, dose intervals, administration routes, excretion rate, and combinations of drugs. Any of the above dosage forms containing effective amounts are well within the bounds of routine experimentation and therefore, well within the scope of the instant invention.
[0236] The specific binding agent is administered by any suitable means, including parenteral, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, intrapulmonary, and intranasal, and, if desired for local treatment, intralesional administration. Parenteral infusions include intravenous, intraarterial, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, intradermal or subcutaneous administration. In addition, the specific binding agent is suitably administered by pulse infusion, particularly with declining doses of the specific binding agent or antibody. Preferably the dosing is given by injections, most preferably intravenous or subcutaneous injections, depending in part on whether the administration is brief or chronic. Other administration methods are contemplated, including topical, particularly transdermal, transmucosal, rectal, oral or local administration e.g. through a catheter placed close to the desired site. Most preferably, the specific binding agent of the invention is administered intravenously in a physiological solution at a dose ranging between 0.01 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg at a frequency ranging from daily to weekly to monthly (e.g. every day, every other day, every third day, or 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 times per week), preferably a dose ranging from 0.1 to 45 mg/kg, 0.1 to 15 mg/kg or 0.1 to 10 mg/kg at a frequency of 2 or 3 times per week, or up to 45 mg/kg once a month.
Administration to Brain
[0237] A variety of approaches are known in the art to effect administration of compounds to the brain. For example, a compound may be administered by direct intraventricular or intrathecal injection, preferably via slow infusion to minimize impact on brain parenchyma. The desired drug may also be delivered using a slow release implant in the brain, or (where the drug is a polypeptide) implanted recombinant cells that produce the drug. The blood brain barrier (BBB) may be permeabilized concomitant with drug administration, to permit movement of the drug across the BBB. Permeabilizing agents include osmotic agents, such as hypertonic mannitol, or another permeabilizing agent such as bradykinin, an alkylglycerol, ultrasound, electromagnetic radiation or parasympathetic innervation.
[0238] Alternatively, receptor-mediated transport may be utilized to administer drug to the brain. It is known in the art that peptides and proteins that directly cross the BBB may serve as carriers for selective therapeutic agents that allow the therapeutic agents to cross the BBB after delivery into the bloodstream (Pan et al., Brain Research Reviews, 46:32-43, 2004; Misra et al., J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci., 6:252-273, 2003; Begley, Pharmacol Ther. 2004 October; 104(1):29-45; Poduslo, US App. Pub. No. 2003/0082191; Poduslo et al., Biochem., 43:6064-6075, 2004). For example, Poduslo, WO 03/020212 describes conjugation of antibodies to amyloid-beta protein fragments which are then taken up by low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein-1, a transporter at the BBB. Other examples of peptides which cross the BBB include transferrin which binds to the transferrin receptor, a transporter at the BBB; monoclonal antibodies to the transferrin receptor such as OX26; cell penetrating peptides such as TAT transduction domain, penetratin, or Syn B1; and RAP which binds to low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein-2, another transporter at the BBB (see Pan et al., J Cell Sci. 2004 Oct. 1; 117(Pt 21):5071-8).
[0239] Receptor-mediated drug delivery to the brain may employ chimeric peptide technology, wherein a non-transportable drug is conjugated to a BBB transport vector. The latter may be a modified protein or receptor-specific monoclonal antibody that undergoes receptor-mediated transcytosis through the BBB in-vivo. Conjugation of drug to transport vector is facilitated with chemical linkers, avidin-biotin technology, polyethylene glycol linkers, or liposomes. Multiple classes of therapeutics have been delivered to the brain with the chimeric peptide technology, including peptide-based pharmaceuticals, anti-sense therapeutics including peptide nucleic acids (PNAs), and small molecules incorporated within liposomes. Alternatively, the drug may be encapsulated in a liposome or nanoparticle which is then linked to the BBB transport vector.
Administration with Other Agents
[0240] The specific binding agents of the invention also may be concurrently administered with other anti-amyloidogenic therapeutic agents. Concurrent administration includes administration of the two different therapeutic agents at different times and at different routes, as long as there is some overlap in the time during which the agents are exerting their therapeutic effects.
[0241] Exemplary anti-amyloidogenic agents known in the art include other anti-amyloid-beta antibodies (U.S. Pat. No. 6,787,637 and U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2004/0171815 and 2004/0171816), anti-inflammatories known in the art (e.g., NSAIDs and Cox-2 inhibitors) that reduce the pathogenic effects of amyloid accumulation, cholesterol lowering drugs, β-secretase inhibitors, γ-secretase inhibitors, peptidic β-secretase inhibitors (Sinha et al., Nature, 402:537-540, 1999), small-molecule inhibitors of the interaction between Aβ and glycosaminoglycans (F. Gervais et at., 7th International Geneva/Springfield Symposium on Advances in Alzheimer Therapy, 2002), short peptidic Aβ derivatives (C. Soto et al., 7th International Geneva/Springfield Symposium on Advances in Alzheimer Therapy, 2002), chelating zinc with the antibiotic clioquinol (Chemy et al., Neuron, 30:665-66, 2001; Bush et al., PNAS, 98:8850-8855, 2001) or anti-inflammatories that reduce the inflammatory response due to the administration of anti-Aβ specific binding agent or that allow monitoring of the side effects of the anti-Aβ specific binding agent.
[0242] The invention is illustrated by the following examples, which are not intended to be limiting in any way.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
Production and Purification of Anti-Amyloid Antibodies
[0243] Xenomouse® IgG1-κ, IgG1-κλ, and IgG4-κλ mice were generated generally as described previously in Mendez et al., Nat. Genet. 15:146-156 (1997) and immunized with Aβ40 fibrils, Aβ42 fibrils, Aβ40 monomer and Aβ42 monomer, respectively, emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant for primary immunization and in incomplete Freund's adjuvant for subsequent injections using standard methods. The mice were immunized twice weekly, via footpad administration, with each mouse receiving 100 μg fibrillar Aβ or 20 μg monomeric Aβ per injection. Serum antibody titers were measured every 2 weeks. Monomeric Aβ elicited a weaker immune response compared to Aβ fibrils.
[0244] Hybridomas were generated by fusing spleen and/or lymph node cells from seropositive animals with sp2/0 myeloma cell line as described in MendeZ et al., supra. Supernatants from hybridomas were screened for binding to fibrillar Aβ (mixture of Aβ40 and Aβ42) in an ELISA format. Supernatants were collected from all positive hybridoma cell lines and were purified using Protein A affinity chromatography.
[0245] Several antibodies were selected for further analysis, including antibodies designated 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9.
Example 2
In Vitro Binding of Antibodies
[0246] This example evaluates the in vitro binding of the antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 to Aβ (monomer and fibrils) and to collagen fibrils. All candidates were run at multiple concentrations in order to obtain concentration response information (where response=binding). From the concentration response curve one can determine an EC50 (the concentration that provokes a response halfway between baseline and maximum response). The EC50 is reflective of binding affinity; however, under the conditions used here, it is not a direct measure of KD. As a negative control, collagen fibrils were used to assess non-specific binding of antibodies.
[0247] The fibrils (Aβ or collagen) were diluted to 10 μg/ml in water and mixed thoroughly. The solution was aliquoted into the wells of a microtiter plate (Immulon-2; VWR; Cat #62404-972) at 50 μl per well (resulting in 0.5 μg fibrils/well final). The plate was dried overnight by being placed uncovered in a 37° C. incubator.
[0248] The same techniques were used for the coating of the microtiter plate for monomer ELISA. The fibrils Aβ monomer were diluted to 2.5 μg/ml in Coating buffer and mixed thoroughly. The solution was aliquoted into the wells of a microtiter plate [Immulon-2; VWR; Cat.#62404-972] at 100 μl per well. The plate was sealed and incubated overnight at 4° C. The plate was washed 5-10× to remove Aβ coating solution prior to starting the assay.
[0249] The wells were blocked with 200 μl of blocking solution and incubated for ≧1 hour at room temperature (RT) with shaking. The blocking solution was flicked out and gently dried on a paper towel. 100 μl of primary antibody diluted in PBS containing 10% blocking solution was added to each well and the plate was incubated at RT for 1 hour with shaking. The plate was washed with 5-10× in TBS, pH 7.5+0.05% Tween 20. 100 μl of secondary antibodies (each diluted 1-2,000-fold in PBS) was added to each well and the plate was incubate at RT for 1 hour with shaking. The plate was washed with 5-10× in TBS, pH 7.5+0.05% Tween 20. 100 μl Streptavidin-Europium reagent (1-1,000-fold dilution) was added (100 μL/well) and the plate was incubated at room temperature for 45 minutes with shaking. The plate was washed 5-10× in TBS, pH 7.5+0.05% Tween 20. 120 μl Enhance Solution was added and the plate was incubated at room temperature for 15-30 minutes with shaking. The plate was read on a Victor TRF plate reader (Europium program).
[0250] Antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 all demonstrated strong binding to Aβ 40 and Aβ 42 fibrils, with EC50s ranging from 90 to 200 μM on Aβ40 fibrils and from 70 to 100 μM on Aβ42 fibrils. Antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 also showed binding to Aβ42 monomer, with EC50s ranging from 30 to 60 μM. Antibodies 1.1 and 1.9 also showed binding to Aβ40 monomer, with an EC50 ranging from 40 to 60 μM. None of the antibodies tested showed any binding in the collagen fibril counter-screen. (See Table 2 below).
[0251]
| TABLE 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELISA Assay | 1.1(EC50) | 1.2 (EC50) | 1.7 (EC50) | 1.9 (EC50) |
| Fibrillar Aβ40 | 13.3 × 10−11 M | 11.5 × 10−11 M | 9.0 × 10−11 M | 19.5 × 10−11 M |
| Fibrillar Aβ42 | 8.2 × 10−11 M | 8.6 × 10−11 M | 7.1 × 10−11 M | 9.6 × 10−11 M |
| Fibrillar collagen | No binding | No binding | No binding | No binding |
| Aβ40 monomer | 5.4 × 10−11 M | 68.9 × 10−11 M | 61.5 × 10−11 M | 4.2 × 10−11 M |
| Aβ42 monomer | 4.5 × 10−11 M | 5.6 × 10−11 M | 5.2 × 10−11 M | 3.7 × 10−11 M |
[0252] The in vitro binding assay described above was repeated using various other human anti-Aβ antibodies (1.14, 1.15, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 6.14, 6.18, 6.27, 6.7, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28, 7.29, 7.32, 8.53, 8.50 and 8.57) using mAb 2.1 chimera as a positive control. (The cDNA and amino acid sequences of the light and heavy variable regions of mAb 2.1 chimera are set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 163-164 and 165-166, respectively. The cDNA and amino acid sequences of the light and heavy chains of mAb 2.1 chimera are set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 167-168 and 169-170, respectively). A visual qualitative assessment of ELISA results for these antibodies indicated that antibodies 7.2, 7.28, 8.50 and 8.57 bound to amyloid monomers and aggregates with as good affinity as mAb 2.1 Chimera (all scored 5/5). Antibodies 1.15 and 7.11 scored 4/5. Antibodies 1.14, 5.3, 6.7, 6.14, 6.18, 6.27, 7.29, 7.32 and 8.53 scored 3/5. Antibodies 5.1, 5.2 scored 2/5.
Example 3
Kinetic Analysis of Antibody Binding to Human Aβ-Peptides
[0253] Kinetic binding analysis was performed using BIAcore to study the interaction of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 with human Aβ40 and Aβ42 fibrils and monomers.
[0254] Preparation of Biacore Chip Surfaces: Immobilization of Proteins to a BIAcore sensor chip (CM5) was performed according to manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, carboxyl groups on the sensor chip surfaces were activated by injecting 60 μL of a mixture containing 0.2 M N-ethyl-N′-(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) and 0.05 M N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS). Specific surfaces were obtained by injecting rProtein G (Pierce), goat anti-mouse Fc (Jackson Immuno Research Lab) or Aβ aggregates diluted in 10 mM acetate, pH 4.0 at concentrations between 5 and 20 μg/mL. Excess reactive groups on the surfaces were deactivated by injecting 60 μL of 1 M ethanolamine. Final immobilized levels were about 10000 resonance units (RU) for the Protein G and anti-mouse Fc surfaces, and 400 RU for the Aβ fibrils surfaces. A blank, mock-coupled reference surface was also prepared on the sensor chips for background subtraction.
[0255] Kinetic analysis of antibodies binding to immobilized Aβ fibrils: Avidity measurements to Aβ fibrils were made by immobilizing amyloid fibrils on the sensor chip surface followed by injection of antibody solutions over the surface, and injection of antibody solutions over a blank surface for background subtraction. Antibodies were diluted in PBS+0.005% P-20+0.1 mg/mL BSA at concentrations varying from 100 nM to 0.2 nM. Results are displayed in Table 3 below.
[0256] Kinetic analysis of Aβ monomers binding to protein G captured antibodies: The kinetic analysis of the interaction between Aβ monomers and antibodies was performed as follows: Antibodies to be tested were diluted in PBS+0.005% P-20+0.1 mg/mL BSA and injected over the immobilized protein G Fc surface. Aβ monomers were diluted in PBS+0.005% P-20+0.1 mg/mL BSA from 1000 nM to 2 nM, and each concentration was injected over the captured antibody surfaces. Results are displayed in Table 4 below.
[0257] Kinetic data analysis of the sensorgrams was performed using BlAevaluation, v. 3.2 (Biacore, Inc., Uppsala, Sweden) to extract ka and kd. KD was estimated as kd/ka. Note that antibodies with off rates smaller than 5×10−5 s−1 could not be differentiated in this assay.
[0258] Results: Both Aβ monomers and fibrils were tested for binding with antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 using BIAcore. The KD of the antibodies binding to the monomers varied from 6 nM to over 200 nM, as determined in the kinetic analysis. The binding between the Aβ fibrils and the antibodies was much stronger that the binding between the Aβ monomers and the antibodies. Tables 3 and 4 below summarize the results of the antibodies binding to Aβ monomers and fibrils.
[0259]
| TABLE 3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avidities of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 to Aβ40 and Aβ42 amyloid | ||||||
| fibrils. | ||||||
| Aβ40 Fibrils | Aβ42 Fibrils | |||||
| Antibody | KD (nM) | ka (1/Ms) | kd (1/s) | KD (nM) | ka (1/Ms) | kd (1/s) |
| 1.1 | 0.02 | 4.2 × 106 | 8.1 × 10−5 | 0.8 | 2.0 × 105 | 1.6 × 10−4 |
| 1.2 | 0.06 | 2.9 × 106 | 1.7 × 10−4 | 1.7 | 1.7 × 105 | 1.9 × 10−4 |
| 1.7 | 0.1 | 3.8 × 106 | 4.2 × 10−4 | 2.9 | 1.7 × 105 | 5.0 × 10−4 |
| 1.9 | 0.03 | 5.3 × 106 | 1.7 × 10−4 | 1.8 | 1.1 × 105 | 1.9 × 10−4 |
[0260]
| TABLE 4 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affinities of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 to soluble Aβ40 and Aβ42. | ||||||
| Aβ40 Monomer | Aβ42 Monomer | |||||
| Antibody | KD (nM) | ka (1/Ms) | kd (1/s) | KD (nM) | ka (1/Ms) | kd (1/s) |
| 1.1 | 117 | 1.3 × 105 | 1.5 × 10−2 | 16 | 2.4 × 105 | 3.9 × 10−3 |
| 1.2. | >200 | n.d. | n.d. | 14 | 7.8 × 104 | 1.1 × 10−3 |
| 1.7 | >200 | n.d. | n.d. | >20 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 1.9 | >200 | n.d. | n.d. | 47 | 6.1 × 104 | 2.9 × 10−3 |
[0261] A slower dissociation rate (kd) is helpful to the antibodies' ability to bind to plaques in brain tissue and induce phagocytosis of amyloid.
[0262] The kinetic analysis assay as described above was repeated using various other human anti-Aβ antibodies (1.14, 1.15, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 6.14, 6.18, 6.27, 6.7, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28, 7.29, 7.32, 8.53, 8.50 and 8.57). Table 5 summarizes the results of anti-Aβ antibodies binding to Aβ fibrils.
[0263]
| TABLE 5 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Binding of Human to Aβ 40 and Aβ 42 fibrils | ||
| Aβ 40 fibrils | Aβ 42 fibrils | |
| Antibody | kd(1/s) | kd(1/s) |
| 1.14 | 1.3 × 10−3 | 8.7 × 10−4 |
| 1.15 | 9.6 × 10−4 | 1.1 × 10−3 |
| 5.1 | 1.9 × 10−3 | 8.8 × 10−4 |
| 5.2 | 2.4 × 10−3 | 1.2 × 10−3 |
| 5.3 | 7.8 × 10−4 | 5.0 × 10−4 |
| 6.14 | 2.6 × 10−3 | 2.9 × 10−3 |
| 6.18 | 4.0 × 10−3 | 2.6 × 10−3 |
| 6.27 | 5.0 × 10−3 | 2.1 × 10−3 |
| 6.7 | 1.6 × 10−3 | 1.8 × 10−3 |
| 7.2 | 1.4 × 10−4 | 2.9 × 10−4 |
| 7.11 | 8.0 × 10−4 | 4.9 × 10−4 |
| 7.28 | 8.2 × 10−5 | 2.1 × 10−4 |
| 7.29 | 7.1 × 10−4 | 6.5 × 10−4 |
| 7.32 | 3.2 × 10−3 | 2.8 × 10−3 |
[0264] The kinetic analysis assay as described above was performed using various other human anti-Aβ antibodies (8.53, 8.50 and 8.57). Antibodies 8.53, 8.50 and 8.57 have comparable binding to Aβ40 fibrils and Aβ42 fibrils as antibodies 1.14, 1.15, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 6.14, 6.18, 6.27, 6.7, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28, 7.29 and 7.32.
Example 4
Analysis of Antibody Binding to Aβ Oligomer
[0265] Aβ42 oligomers were prepared according to published methods (Lambert et al, 1998). Briefly, Aβ42 peptide (dry powder) was suspended in HFIP to a concentration of 2 mg/mL and the solution was allowed to evaporate to dryness in a fume hood. Residual HFIP was removed by vacuum centrifugation for 10 minutes. Dried Aβ42 resolubilized in DMSO to a concentration of 5 mM (22.5 mg/mL) followed by dilution 100 μM (0.45 mg/mL) in ice-cold Ham's F-12 media (phenol red free). Following incubation at 4° C. (from 24-48 h), insoluble material was removed by centrifugation 14,000 rpm for 15 minutes in a tabletop centrifuge. Supernatant containing soluble, Aβ42 monomer and oligomers was used immediately for immunoprecipitation.
[0266] Immunoprecipitation/Western Blot protocol: Aβ 42 oligomers (1.2 μg/mL) were immunoprecipitated overnight at 4° C. with 5 μg/mL anti-Aβ antibody and 30-40 μL Protein G agarose beads. Incubations were spun at 3,000 rpm for 5 min at 4° C. in an Eppendorf tabletop centrifuge. Supernatants were discarded and beads were washed for 20 min at 4° C. in the following 3 wash buffers: 1st wash—1 mL 0.5 M NaCl STEN buffer; 2nd wash—1 mL SDS-STEN buffer; and 3rd wash—1 mL 1×STEN buffer. Following each wash, beads were collected by centrifugation at 6,000 g for 5 min at 4° C. Following the final wash step, antibody/Aβ complexes were eluted with 14 μL 2× Tris-Glycine Sample Buffer. Samples were heated for 5 min at 100° C. and spun for 5 min at 14,000 rpm. Supernatatants were loaded into NuPAGE 12% Bis-Tris pre-cast gels and run in MES running buffer at 200 V for approximately 1 h (until gel front reached bottom of gel). Gel contents were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using the Novex transfer box and NuPAGE transfer buffer with 20% methanol. Transfer was performed at 25 V for 1 h. To increase Western Blot sensitivity, the membrane was heated in PBS as follows: microwaved in pipette box lid (one membrane per lid) on high for 3-4 min, making certain PBS came to a boil. Membrane was then cooled for 1.5 min, flipped and microwaving was repeated. Membrane was then blocked with 5% NFDM in TBST for 0.5 hr at RT. Blocking solution was removed and a solution of detection antibody (6E10 at 1 μg/mL) was added to the membrane and allowed to incubate for 1 hr at RT with shaking. The membrane was then washed 3 times by incubation with 1% NFDM in TBST for 5 minutes at RT with shaking. Following the washes, a solution of secondary antibody (peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG) diluted 1:5000 in 1% NFDM was added to the membrane and allowed to incubate with shaking at RT for 30 minutes. The membrane was then washed in TBST as before. The membrane was developed using the ECL+Plus Detection System as follows: 100 pit Solution B was added to 4 mL of Solution A; the mixture was then added to the membrane and incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature without shaking. The membrane was then exposed to film in a dark room for 10 sec, 30 sec, 1 min, and 5 min, and the film was processed using a Kodak X-OMAT film processor. If re-exposure was necessary, subsequent exposure times were adjusted based on initial result.
[0267] Discussion: Antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 were assessed for their ability to bind to soluble, oligomeric species of Aβ42 using an immunoprecipitation/Western blot procedure. Antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 and the controls, murine mAb 4G8, all demonstrated the ability to bind to soluble, monomeric and oligomeric Aβ42 species. Based on a set of molecular weight standards, the primary species captured by immunoprecipitation corresponded to a molecular weight consistent with Aβ42 monomer (i.e., 4-5 kD). Additionally, Aβ42 species with apparent molecular weights corresponding to Aβ42 dimer, trimer, and tetramer (ie, 8-9 kD, 12-14 kD and 16-18 kD, respectively) were also immunoprecipitated.
Example 5
Immunohistochemical Analysis of Antibodies on Tg2576 Mouse Brain and Human Brain Sections
[0268] The ability of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 to bind to native amyloid plaques in situ was evaluated in unfixed fresh frozen tissue sections of human AD brain and of Tg2576 transgenic mouse brains.
[0269] Tissue Specimens: Animals sacrifices with inhalation of CO2 and were perfused with saline. Brains were dissected out from the skull and bisected at the mid-line. Half of the brain is frozen on dry ice for future biochemical study and the other half is embedded in OCT embedding medium and frozen on dry ice for histology studies. Frozen human cortex from a 74-year old female Alzheimer's Disease subject and an 81-year old normal female subject were obtained from the Human Brain and Spinal Fluid Resource Center (CA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, Calif.).
[0270] Histology: 14 μm-thick fresh-frozen coronal serial sections of mouse brains or the cerebral cortex of a human AD brain are cut using a cryostat microtome. Sections are thaw-mounted onto Fisher “plus” microscope slides and briefly air-dried. Sections are stored at −20° C. until use. At the time of staining, sections are warmed to room temperature and the endogenous tissue peroxidase activity is destroyed by incubating with 3% H2O2 in PBS for 15 minutes.
[0271] For evaluation of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, and 1.9 on mouse brains, sections are incubated in a blocking solution (3% normal goat serum/5% normal horse serum/0.25% carrageenan lambda/0.1% triton/PBS) for 1 hour. Sections are incubated with 1 μg/ml test antibody in the above blocking solution at 4° C. overnight. Sections are then incubated with 2 μg/ml biotinylated goat anti-human IgG on the shaker at room temperature for 1 hour.
[0272] For evaluation of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, and 1.9 on human brains, sections are incubated in a blocking solution (3% normal goat serum/5% normal horse serum/0.25% carrageenan lambda/0.1% triton/PBS) for 1 hour. Sections are incubated with 1 μg/ml biotinylated test antibody in the above blocking solution at 4° C. overnight.
[0273] Antigen is detected by ABC/DAB protocol as described in Yan et al, J. Comp. Neurol., 378:135-157 (1997). Sections are dehydrated and cover-slipped with mounting medium.
[0274] Unfixed sections of a 20 month-old Tg25476 mouse brain containing a substantial amount of amyloid plaques were used to test the ability of antibodies to recognize native mouse amyloid plaques. A commercially available anti-Aβ antibody, mAb 4G8, was used as a positive control. Blinded samples were scored visually for plaque number, intensity, and non-specific background, and assigned a score from 1-5, with 5 representing the most intense staining. Antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 all stained Aβ plaques with high intensity (score=5) and with low to medium non-specific tissue binding (score=1-2). Irrelevant mouse monoclonal IgG showed no staining as expected.
[0275] Next, unfixed sections from a 74 year-old AD brain was used to evaluate if antibodies could recognize human amyloid plaques. Consistent with results on transgenic mouse tissue, all of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 efficiently bound unfixed plaques. Irrelevant mouse monoclonal IgG showed no staining as expected.
[0276] Immunohistochemistry analysis as described above was repeated using various other human anti-Aβ antibodies (1.14, 1.15, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 6.14, 6.18, 6.27, 6.7, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28, 7.29, 8.32, 8.53, 8.50 and 8.57 on unfixed sections of a 19 month-old Tg25476 mouse brain containing a substantial amount of amyloid plaques. The staining intensity observed is set forth in Table 6 below. Irrelevant mouse monoclonal IgG showed no staining as expected.
[0277]
| TABLE 6 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Staining intensities of Tg25476 mouse brain sections | ||
| Antibody | IHC Score | |
| 1.14 | 3 | |
| 1.15 | 4 | |
| 5.1 | 5 | |
| 5.2 | 4+/5 | |
| 5.3 | 5 | |
| 6.14 | 4+/5 | |
| 6.18 | 5 | |
| 6.27 | 5+ | |
| 6.7 | 5 | |
| 7.2 | 3−/4+ | |
| 7.11 | 4+/5 | |
| 7.28 | 4 | |
| 7.29 | 4 | |
| 7.32 | 3+ | |
| 8.53 | 3 | |
| 8.50 | 1+/2 | |
| 8.57 | 1+/2 | |
Example 6
Functional Activity of Antibodies in Ex Vivo Phagocytosis Assay
[0278] In this ex vivo phagocytosis assay, candidate antibodies were characterized for their ability to induce phagocytosis of amyloid deposits in brain sections of Tg2576 mice or a human AD patient. Human-derived or humanized antibodies cannot be dosed chronically in a murine model of disease. The phagocytosis assay has been shown to be a good predictor of in vivo antibody efficacy (reduction of plaque burden) in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Antibody efficacy appears to be dependent on both binding to unfixed plaques and avidity.
[0279] Cell line culture. IC-21 and other cells were obtained from ATCC and culture in RPMI (Gibco BRL) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 4.5 g/L glucose, 10 mM HEPES (Gibco BRL), 1.0 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco BRL) and 10% fetal bovine serum. Confluent cultures of IC-21 cells were detached from the T-75 plastic culture flask with 1% trypsin (Gibco BRL). The cell suspension was centrifuged at 1000 rpm and resuspended in the assay medium consisting of hybridoma-serum free medium with 1% FBS, glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin and 5 ng/ml mGM-CSF to a density of 1.6×106 cells/mL prior to use in the phagocytosis assay.
[0280] Phagocytosis assay. The antibodies were tested at a concentration ranging from 0.0001 μg/ml to 10 μg/ml. For selected antibodies, a full range of dose-response curves was generated. Briefly, a 10 μm cryostat section of 18-19 month-old female Tg2576 mouse brains were thawed and mounted onto poly-lysine coated glass coverslips and placed in wells of 24-well tissue culture plates. The coverslips were washed twice with the assay medium. Control or anti-Aβ antibodies were added at 2× final concentration in the 0.15 ml assay medium for 1 hour at incubator (37° C., 5% CO2). 0.15 ml of microglial cells (phagocytosis competent IC-21 cells) were then seeded at a density of 1.6×106 cells/ml assay medium. The cultures were incubated in a humidified incubator (37° C., 5% CO2) for 24 hours or more. At the end of the incubation, ex vivo samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 hour at room temperature and washed with PBS. Sections were then incubated with blocking solution consisting of 5% normal goat serum (Vector, Burlingame, Calif.) and 0.4% Triton-X100 at room temperature for 2 hours. Specimens were incubated overnight at 4° C. in block buffer and stained with biotinylated mouse antibody 6E10 (3 μg/mL) (Senetek, St. Louis, Mo.) and rat anti-CD11b) 10 μg/mL) (or rat anti-CD45 and rat anti-F4/80, Serotec, Raleigh, N.C.) followed by a streptavidin-FITC (Vector Labs, Burlingame, Calif.) and goat anti-rat IgG-Cy3 or rat anti-rat IgG-texas red (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PS). The sections were observed, and photographed with a confocal microscope (Nikon) using SimplePCI software (Compix Inc., PA). Amyloid plaques (diameter of 10-100 μm), microglia (diameter of 10-20 μm) and internalized amyloid (green inside red ring representing microglia surface stain) can easily be distinguished by using confocal microscopy with optical planes of 0.5 μm thickness. Any plaque that was associated with an IC21 cell containing internalized amyloid was counted as a positive event.
[0281] Analysis. For quantification of phagocytosis, one brain section per concentration point was used, covering antibody concentrations in the range of 0.0001-10 μg/ml. 50-100 cortical plaques were examined at 40× magnification, and both, partially and completely internalized plaques were counted as positive events. The percentage of plaques being phagocytosed was calculated and plotted over the antibody concentration. Determination of EC50, defined as the concentration of test antibody at which 50% of plaques count as positive events as described above, together with a maximum percentage reached at 10 μg/ml, allowed ranking of antibodies with regard to phagocytic potency. Data were plotted and EC50 values were determined by using the Prism software v4.01 (GraphPad, San Diego, Calif.).
[0282] Amyloid plaques remained intact and no phagocytosis was observed in the presence of 0.001-10 μg/ml irrelevant mouse IgG. In contrast, after incubation of adjacent sections in the presence of 10 μg/ml antibody, extracellular amyloid deposits were almost completely resolved and instead were localized within the microglial cells.
[0283] To confirm that this was internalization, confocal microscopy was used to scan serially focal planes of 0.5 μm thickness from top to bottom of plaques at 40× objective. The Z-series of optical planes showed that in the presence of 10 μg of antibody, microglia engulfed all amyloid; however, in the presence of mouse IgG control antibody, exogenous microglial cells remained in a confocal plane above the tissue section and contained no amyloid deposits, whereas amyloid remained in the plaques with the tissue plane. These results demonstrate that the tested antibodies had the ability to trigger phagocytosis of amyloid and lead to amyloid clearance.
[0284] Results and Discussion: In order to quantify antibody induced phagocytosis of amyloid, an ex vivo phagocytosis experiment was performed on antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 in full concentration titration (0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 3, and 10 μml). Phagocytic events were defined as partially and completely internalized amyloid plaques as described above. The percentage of plaques being phagocytosed was calculated and plotted over the antibody concentration. Antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 induced 75-90% phagocytosis. In the presence of control mouse IgG, no phagocytosis was seen. EC50 values for antibodies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9 were 0.6-0.8 μg/ml. This was equivalent to the EC50 value for a positive control antibody of 0.6 μg/ml. Antibody 1.7 induced a slightly lower amount of phagocytosis (EC50=2.0 μg/ml), which was not observed in a repeated assay. The assay was repeated and these data with respect to antibodies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9 were confirmed. Specifically, in the repeated assay antibodies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9 induced similar amounts of phagocytosis (i.e., EC50 ranging from 0.3-1.0 μg/ml). In the repeated assay, antibody 1.7 induced amounts of phagocytosis similar to those of antibodies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9. Taken together, these data indicate that fully human Aβ-specific monoclonal antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.9 induced efficient phagocytosis of brain-derived amyloid plaques.
Example 7
Treatment of APP Transgenic Tg2576 Mice
[0285] The ability of peripherally administered anti-Aβ antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 and 8.57 to reduce amyloid plaque burden is evaluated in APP transgenic Tg2576 mice overexpressing Aβ. Studies with murine antibodies of similar affinity and avidity indicate that it is possible to identify amyloid phagocytosing microglial cells after just a single i.p. injection in vivo. Thus, functional activity of antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 and 8.57, can be evaluated qualitatively in this assay by identifying amyloid phagocytosis by endogenous microglia.
[0286] Treatment: At 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 or older months of age, mice are treated with a single intraperitoneal injection with control vehicle, or test antibody.
[0287] PK Sampling: Blood samples (50-100 μL) for PK analysis are collected from mice from the test antibody and control antibody group into serum separator tubes (Microtainer Brand) through the tail vein at pre-dose, e.g., 24 hrs after the 1st dose, and pre-necropsy, e.g., 7 days post-dose. At the end of the study, animals are euthanized by CO2 inhalation followed immediately by the collection from both dose groups of approximately 1 mL of blood through cardiopuncture into a serum separator tube (Microtainer Brand) for PK analysis. Serum samples are prepared and stored at −80° C. until analysis for levels of test article by time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay.
[0288] Brain Dissection: Following the blood collection, the brain is dissected out from the skull and bisected at the mid-line. Half of the brain is frozen on dry ice for future biochemical study and the other half is embedded in OCT embedding medium and frozen on dry ice for histology studies.
[0289] Histology: 14 mm-thick fresh frozen coronal serial sections are cut in a cryostat microtome. Sections are thaw-mounted onto Fisher “plus” microscope slides and air-dried. Sections were stored at −20° C. until use. At the time of staining, sections are warmed to room temperature and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, for 1 hr. The endogenous tissue peroxidase activity is destroyed by incubating with 3% H2O2 in PBS for 20 min. Sections are then incubated with 88% formic acid for 20 min to expose Aβ epitope and then with blocking solution (3% normal goat serum/5% normal horse serum/0.25% carrageenan lambda/0.1% triton/PBS) for 1 hr. Sections are incubated with 0.5 μg/mL biotinylated anti-human Aβ monoclonal antibody 4G8 (Senetek, St. Louis, Mo.) or a control biotinylated mouse myeloma IgG (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) in the above blocking solution at 4° C. overnight. The antigen is detected by ABC/DAB protocol as described in Yan et al., J. Comp. Neurol., 378:135-157 (1997). Sections are dehydrated and cover-slipped with mounting medium. Some sections are used for thioflavine-S staining according to standard histology protocol to detect fibril form of amyloid plaques in the brain parenchyma and amyloid plaque associated with cerebral blood vessels (cerebral amyloid angiopathy, CAA).
[0290] In vivo phagocytosis: The brain sections are fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 hr followed by incubation with blocking solution (same as above) for 1 hr. The sections are then incubated overnight with 10 μg/mL of biotinylated-6E10 (Senetek, St. Louis, Mo.) and rabbit anti-CSF-1R antiserum (Upstate, Lake Placid, N.Y.) diluted 1:250. The sections are stained with streptavidin-FITC (diluted 1:200) and goat anti-rabbit IgG-Texas Red (Vector Lab, Burlingame, Calif.) (diluted 1:200). The sections are then analyzed using a confocal microscope.
[0291] All the quantitative results are analyzed by one-way ANOVA test followed by Newman-Keuls test using Prism software version 4.01 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif.). All results are expressed as the mean±error of mean.
[0292] Little or no plaques are present in the brains of Tg2576 mice at age 7.5-8 months. By age 13.5-14 months, substantial numbers of amyloid plaques are expected to exist in the cortex and hippocampus of the control animals. As the animals grow older, their plaque burden increases. Examination of the cingulate cortex, piriform cortex, and hippocampus is also performed.
[0293] The ability of activated microglia to phagocytose Aβ after the treatment with anti-amyloid antibody is studied. Sections from the three treatment groups are double stained with a plaque marker and an activated microglial marker and then examined under a confocal microscope. In the control group, Aβ deposits are expected to remain intact with no indication of phagocytosis. In the treated groups, the Aβ deposits are expected to be surrounded by an increased level of activated microglia compared to the level of activated microglia in the control group, indicating the initiation of an increased phagocytic response. Treatment with antibodies 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 1.9, 1.14, 1.15, 6.18, 6.27, 7.2, 7.11, 7.28 and 8.57 are expected to increase the number of phagocytic events.
[0294] The above example is expected to indicate that treatment with anti-Aβ antibodies results in increased phagocytosis of amyloid plaque burden.
Example 8
Treatment of APP Transgenic Tg2576 Mice with mAb 2.1 IgG
[0295] The ability of peripherally administered anti-Aβ antibody 2.1 (comprising heavy and light chains of SEQ ID NOS: 49 and 51) to reduce amyloid plaque burden was evaluated in APP transgenic Tg2576 mice overexpressing Aβ. Antibody 2.1 is a murine surrogate for antibodies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9, with similar binding avidity and affinity for Aβ monomers and fibrils as antibodies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9.
[0296] Treatment: 9 month-old Tg2576 mice were treated weekly through i.p. route with murine monoclonal anti-Aβ 2.1 IgG in PBS at doses of 0 (started with 4 males, 6 females, 2 females died), 1.5 (started with 2 males, 8 females, 1 male and 1 female died), 4.5 (started with 4 males, 6 females, no death), 15 (started with 4 males, 6 females, 2 males and 1 female died), and 45 mg/kg (started with 4 males, 6 females, 1 male and 1 female died) in the volume of 5 ml/kg. The duration of treatment was 24 weeks. Blood samples (50-100 μl) were collected through tail vein at pre-dose, 4 hours after the 1st, 8th, 16th, 24th injections and one time just before the 24th injection, 6 time points in total. Seven days after the 24th injection, CSF and blood from cardiac puncture was collected.
[0297] Brain Dissection: All the animals were flushed with 5 ml of saline through the heart. The brain was then dissected out from the skull and bisected at the mid-line. Half of the brain was frozen on dry ice for future biochemical study and the other half was embedded in OCT tissue medium and then frozen on dry ice for histology studies.
[0298] Histology: 14 μm-thick fresh frozen coronal serial sections were cut in a cryostat microtome. Sections were thaw mounted onto the Fisher “plus” microscope slides and air-dried. Sections were stored at −20° C. until use. At the time of staining, sections were warmed to room temperature and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 for 1 hr. The endogenous tissue peroxidase activity was destroyed by incubating with 3% H2O2 in PBS for 20 min. Sections were then incubated with 88% formic acid for 20 min to expose Aβ epitope and then with blocking solution (3% normal goat serum/5% normal horse serum/0.25% carrageenan lambda/0.1% triton/PBS) for 1 hr. Sections were incubated with 0.5 μg/ml biotinylated anti-human Aβ monoclonal antibody 4G8 or a control mouse myeloma IgG (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) in the above blocking solution at 4° C. over night. The antigen was detected by ABC/DAB protocol as described (Yan et al., 1997). Sections were dehydrated and cover-slipped with mounting medium.
[0299] Morphological data analysis: Stained sections were examined under a light microscope. Digital images were taken under the microscope equipped with a digital camera. For amyloid plaque burden, the images were analyzed with MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging Corp., West Chester, Pa.). Seven sections (1 out of every 5 serial sections) of each animal containing cingulate cortex (between Bregma 1.54 mm to −0.1 mm) (Franklin and Paxinos, 1997) and 8 sections of each animal containing hippocampus (between Bregma −1.7 mm to −2.8 mm) were used for the analysis. The area of interest was manually outlined under 4× magnification. The software was programmed to measure the numbers of plaques, the average size of plaques and the integrated plaque staining gray scale. The percentage of area covered by plaques was calculated by multiplying the number of plaques with the average size of plaques divided by the area of interest and time 100.
[0300] Data analysis: All the quantitative results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA test and followed by Donett t test.
[0301] FIGS. 2A-2D shows quantitative morphological analysis of the plaque burden in cingulate cortex. Only the treatment of 45 mg/k resulted in a significant reduction of plaque burden (50% reduction vs, PBS, p<0.05). The plaque burden in the hippocampus shows a trend of reduction with increased dosage of 2.1 treatment, but did not reach the statistically significant level.
[0302] The above assay was repeated with a more frequent dosing regimen of 3× per week. Compared with PBS treatment, 1.5 mg/kg mAb 2.1 treatment resulted in a significant (p=0.007) 44% plaque burden reduction in the cingulate cortex (FIGS. 3A-3D ). In these same animals, mAb 2.1 treatment resulted in 32% plaque burden reduction in the hippocampus but that did not reach statistical significance (p=0.056).
Example 9
Pharmacokinetic Study of Antibodies Following Single IV Dose Administration to Male Cynomolgus Monkeys
[0303] The following Example characterizes the single-dose pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9 administered to male cynomolgus monkeys as an intravenous (IV) bolus injection.
[0304] A total of nine drug-naïve male cynomolgus monkeys (Vietnamese origin, 3.1-4.9 kg at time of dose administration) were obtained from Covance Laboratories, Inc. Madison, Wis. The animals were assigned to Groups 1, 2 or 3 based on body weight and received one of the three treatments set forth in Table 5 below.
[0305]
| TABLE 5 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target | ||||||
| Nominal | Dose | Dose | ||||
| Dose | Conc. | Volume | ||||
| Group No. | Antibodies | Route | (mg/kg) | (mg/mL) | (mL/kg) | n/group |
| 1 | 1.1 | IV | 4.5 | 3 | 1.5 | 3 |
| 2 | 1.2 | IV | 4.5 | 3 | 1.5 | 3 |
| 3 | 1.9 | IV | 4.5 | 3 | 1.5 | 3 |
[0306] Antibodies 1.1, 1.2 or 1.9 were administered as a single IV bolus injection at a dose of 4.5 mg/kg via the saphenous vein. Blood for determination of serum 1.1, 1.2 or 1.9 antibody concentrations was collected from each animal prior to dose administration and at 0.83, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72, 120, 168, 240, 336, 504, 672, 840, 1172 and 1512 hours postdose. All blood samples were collected from the femoral vein. 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9 antibody concentrations in serum were quantified using a non-validated ELISA method. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using noncompartmental methods.
[0307] Following intravenous bolus administration, the initial concentration at time zero (C0) was estimated by back-extrapolation of the first two observed serum concentration values to time zero using linear/log regression. The initial volume of distribution (V0) was calculated as IV dose/C0. No noncompartmental analysis was conducted in one group 1 animal (antibody 1.1, 4.5 mg/kg), since C0, and thus V0, could not be determined due to the actual peak serum concentration which was observed at 8 hours postdose. The terminal phase rate constant (λz) was determined by linear regression of the natural logarithms of at least three or more measurable concentrations in the terminal phase. The terminal phase half-life (t1/2,z) was calculated as ln (2)/λz. The area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (Clast), AUC0-t, was calculated using the linear/log trapezoidal method. The area under the serum concentration-time curve from the time of the last quantifiable concentration to infinity (AUCt-inf) was estimated as predicted Clast/λz. The area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) was calculated as AUC0-t+AUCt-inf. Systemic clearance (CL) was calculated as IV dose/AUC0-inf. The volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) was calculated as AUMC0−inf/AUC0−inf×CL, where AUMC0-inf is the area under the first moment curve from time zero to infinity.
[0308] Results: Following a single IV administration of antibody 1.1, 1.2 or 1.9 to monkeys, the antibody serum concentrations declined in a biphasic manner with an overall mean terminal phase half-life of 8, 10, and 7 days for antibodies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.9, respectively. See Table 6, below. The exposure (based on C0 and AUC0-inf) of the antibodies were ranked in the following order: antibody 1.2>antibody 1.9> and antibody 1.1. Because the dosage was administered intravenously, the C0 is a surrogate for Cmax.
[0309]
| TABLE 6 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C0 | AUC0-inf | CL | t1/2, z | Vss | V0 | |
| Group | (μg/mL) | (hr · μg/mL) | (mL/hr/kg) | (day) | (mL/kg) | (mL/kg) |
| Antibody 1.1, n = 2 | ||||||
| 1 | 2.67 | 221 | 20.7 | 7.64 | 4470 | 1690 |
| (NC) | (NC) | (NC) | (NC) | (NC) | (NC) | |
| Antibody 1.2, n = 3 | ||||||
| 2 | 84.0 | 13200 | 0.350 | 9.61 | 128 | 54.1 |
| (10.1) | (2370) | (0.0662) | (0.167) | (8.48) | (6.14) | |
| Antibody 1.9, n = 2 | ||||||
| 3 | 36.4 | 2430 | 1.87 | 7.25 | 525 | 125 |
| (4.85) | (284) | (0.230) | (1.03) | (80.2) | (15.5) | |
[0310] All of the above U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications and non patent publications referred to in this specification and/or listed in the Application Data Sheet, are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety.
[0311] From the foregoing it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims
Certificate of Correction present
The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.
What is claimed is:
1. An isolated antibody that specifically binds to amyloid-beta 1-42 (Aβ42) with a dissociation rate constant (kd) of about 1×10−4 s−1 or less as measured by surface plasmon resonance, and that comprises a light chain and a heavy chain, comprising:
(a) a CDRL1 sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 15;
(b) a CDRL2 sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 16;
(c) a CDRL3 sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 17;
(d) a CDRH1 sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 18;
(e) a CDRH2 sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 19; and
(f) a CDRH3 sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 20.
2. The antibody of claim 1, wherein said antibody comprises a heavy chain variable region comprising the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 12 and a light chain variable region comprising the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 14.
4. The antibody of claim 3, wherein the antibody is an IgG antibody.
5. The antibody of claim 4, wherein the antibody is an IgG antibody and comprises two heavy chains and two light chains.
6. The antibody of claim 1, wherein the light chain comprises the amino acid sequence of amino acids 21-239 of SEQ ID NO:137.
7. The antibody of claim 1, wherein the heavy chain comprises the amino acid sequence of amino acids 20-470 of SEQ ID NO:139.
8. The antibody of claim 1, wherein the light chain comprises the amino acid sequence of amino acids 21-239 of SEQ ID NO:137 and the heavy chain comprises the amino acid sequence of amino acids 20-470 of SEQ ID NO:139.
9. The antibody of claim 3, wherein the antibody is an IgG antibody and is a single chain Fv antibody fragment, an Fab fragment, F(ab′)2 fragment, an Fd, a domain antibody (dAb), a diabody, a maxibody or a nanobody.
11. A vector comprising the nucleic acid of claim 10.
12. A host cell comprising the vector of claim 11.
14. The method of claim 13, further comprising the step of recovering the antibody from the host cell culture.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the amyloidogenic disease is selected from the group consisting of Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment, Parkinson's Disease with dementia, Down's Syndrome, Diffuse Lewy Body (DLB) disease, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA), vascular dementia, and mixed dementia.
18. The method of claim 16, wherein the mammal is human.
19. The method of claim 16, wherein the administering is performed intrathecally.
Patent Citations (155)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4179337(A) | 1979-12-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US4301144(A) | 1981-11-01 | Iwashita et al. | Applicant |
| USRE30985(E) | 1982-06-01 | Cartaya | Applicant |
| US4495285(A) | 1985-01-01 | Shimizu et al. | Applicant |
| US4496689(A) | 1985-01-01 | Mitra | Applicant |
| US4560655(A) | 1985-12-01 | Baker | Applicant |
| US4609564(A) | 1986-09-01 | Pinkhasov | Applicant |
| US4640835(A) | 1987-02-01 | Shimizu et al. | Applicant |
| US4657866(A) | 1987-04-01 | Kumar | Applicant |
| US4666829(A) | 1987-05-01 | Glenner et al. | Applicant |
| US4670417(A) | 1987-06-01 | Iwasaki et al. | Applicant |
| US4766106(A) | 1988-08-01 | Katre et al. | Applicant |
| US4767704(A) | 1988-08-01 | Cleveland et al. | Applicant |
| US4791192(A) | 1988-12-01 | Nakagawa et al. | Applicant |
| US4816567(A) | 1989-03-01 | Cabilly et al. | Applicant |
| US4892538(A) | 1990-01-01 | Aebischer et al. | Applicant |
| US4927762(A) | 1990-05-01 | Darfler | Applicant |
| US5122469(A) | 1992-06-01 | Mather et al. | Applicant |
| US5200339(A) | 1993-04-01 | Abraham | Applicant |
| US5229275(A) | 1993-07-01 | Goroff | Applicant |
| US5283187(A) | 1994-02-01 | Aebischer et al. | Applicant |
| US5455169(A) | 1995-10-01 | Mullan | Applicant |
| US5530101(A) | 1996-06-01 | Queen et al. | Applicant |
| US5562903(A) | 1996-10-01 | Co et al. | Applicant |
| US5565332(A) | 1996-10-01 | Hoogenboom et al. | Applicant |
| US5567610(A) | 1996-10-01 | Borrebaeck et al. | Applicant |
| US5573905(A) | 1996-11-01 | Lerner et al. | Applicant |
| US5585089(A) | 1996-12-01 | Queen et al. | Applicant |
| US5591828(A) | 1997-01-01 | Bosslet et al. | Applicant |
| US5693762(A) | 1997-12-01 | Queen et al. | Applicant |
| US5744346(A) | 1998-04-01 | Chrysler et al. | Applicant |
| US5766886(A) | 1998-06-01 | Studnicka et al. | Applicant |
| US5795963(A) | 1998-08-01 | Mullan | Applicant |
| US5877293(A) | 1999-03-01 | Adair et al. | Applicant |
| US5939598(A) | 1999-08-01 | Kucherlapati et al. | Applicant |
| US5942400(A) | 1999-08-01 | Anderson et al. | Applicant |
| US6054287(A) | 2000-04-01 | Gao et al. | Applicant |
| US6171586(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Lam et al. | Applicant |
| US6221645(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Chrysler et al. | Applicant |
| US6245884(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Hook | Applicant |
| US6313268(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Hook | Applicant |
| US6331408(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Zaczek et al. | Applicant |
| US6489123(B2) | 2002-12-01 | Osbourn et al. | Applicant |
| US6545127(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Tang et al. | Applicant |
| US6583268(B2) | 2003-06-01 | Lin | Applicant |
| US6737038(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Zaczek et al. | Applicant |
| US6743427(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Schenk | Applicant |
| US6787637(B1) | 2004-09-01 | Schenk | Applicant |
| US6790610(B2) | 2004-09-01 | Gurney et al. | Applicant |
| US6797487(B2) | 2004-09-01 | Gurney et al. | Applicant |
| US6818448(B2) | 2004-11-01 | Mullan | Applicant |
| US6852482(B1) | 2005-02-01 | Chrysler et al. | Applicant |
| US6864290(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Schostarez et al. | Applicant |
| US7033812(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Zhong et al. | Applicant |
| US7041870(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Tomizuka et al. | Applicant |
| US7087399(B1) | 2006-08-01 | Zhong et al. | Applicant |
| US7119166(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Lin | Applicant |
| US7153491(B2) | 2006-12-01 | Zaczek et al. | Applicant |
| US7169901(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Baca et al. | Applicant |
| US7179892(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Basi et al. | Applicant |
| US7183390(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Vasquez et al. | Applicant |
| US7241873(B2) | 2007-07-01 | Uede et al. | Applicant |
| US7244708(B2) | 2007-07-01 | Tang et al. | Applicant |
| US7256273(B2) | 2007-08-01 | Basi et al. | Applicant |
| US7320790(B2) | 2008-01-01 | Hinton et al. | Applicant |
| US7335632(B2) | 2008-02-01 | Ghosh et al. | Applicant |
| US7351803(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US7538258(B2) | 2009-05-01 | Mullan | Applicant |
| US7732399(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Goldenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0055459(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Chopra et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0086847(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Chain | Applicant |
| US2002/0115600(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Koelsch et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0157122(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Wong et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0044772(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Watkins et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0073655(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Chain | Applicant |
| US2003/0082191(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Poduslo et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0082735(A1) | 2003-05-01 | McGrew et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0092125(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0113316(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Kaisheva et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0043418(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Holtzman et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0132680(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Wong et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0167075(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Tang et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0171815(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Schenk et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0171816(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Schenk et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0220079(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Koelsch et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0248232(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Hook | Applicant |
| US2004/0248766(A1) | 2004-12-01 | LeBlanc | Applicant |
| US2005/0019255(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Zaczek et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0034848(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Kinoshita et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0182684(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Beliveau | Applicant |
| US2006/0189515(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Beliveau et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0198851(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Basi et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0228349(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Acton et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0099185(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Hagen et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0021196(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Tang et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0292639(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Shen et al. | Applicant |
| EP315456(A2) | 1989-05-01 | Applicant | |
| EP61307(A2) | 1994-08-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1431310(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1129355(B1) | 2005-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1327143(B1) | 2007-02-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1255769(B1) | 2007-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-87/00195(A1) | 1987-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-87/05330(A1) | 1987-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-90/03430(A1) | 1990-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-90/14363(A1) | 1990-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-91/00741(A1) | 1991-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-91/17271(A1) | 1991-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-92/01047(A1) | 1992-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-92/11018(A1) | 1992-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-93/11161(A1) | 1993-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-93/25673(A1) | 1993-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-94/02602(A1) | 1994-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-96/25435(A1) | 1996-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-96/32478(A1) | 1996-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-96/33735(A1) | 1996-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-96/34096(A1) | 1996-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-96/04885(A3) | 1996-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-96/40885(A2) | 1996-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-97/34631(A1) | 1997-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-98/24893(A2) | 1998-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-98/44955(A1) | 1998-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-99/60024(C2) | 1999-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-99/27944(A1) | 1999-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-99/27944(C2) | 1999-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-00/17369(A2) | 2000-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-00/23576(A2) | 2000-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-00/24782(A2) | 2000-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-00/47618(C2) | 2000-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-01/23533(A2) | 2001-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-02/25276(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-02/46237(A2) | 2002-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-02/088307(A2) | 2002-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03/016467(A2) | 2003-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03/020212(A2) | 2003-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03/027151(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03/070760(A2) | 2003-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/032868(A2) | 2004-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/060403(A2) | 2004-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/065423(A2) | 2004-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/080419(A2) | 2004-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/084830(A2) | 2004-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/108895(A2) | 2004-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/108895(A3) | 2004-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/110369(A2) | 2004-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2006/055178(A2) | 2006-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2006/066089(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2006/066171(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2006/081171(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2006104677(A2) | 2006-10-01 | Examiner | |
| WO-2007/009229(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2007/113172(A2) | 2007-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2007/113172(A3) | 2007-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2008/046228(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2009040134(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Examiner |
Non-Patent Literature (129)
- U.S. Appl. No. 60/474,654, filed May 30, 2003, Basi, Guriq.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 60/621,776, filed Oct. 25, 2004, Lambert et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 60/636,776, filed Dec. 15, 2004, Basi et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 60/646,658, filed Jan. 24, 2005, Shen et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 60/652,538, filed Feb. 14, 2005, Shughrue et al.Applicant
- Anderson, Human gene therapy, Nature, 392:25-30, 1998.Applicant
- Aplin et al., Preparation, properties, and applications of carbohydrate conjugates of proteins and lipids, CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem., 10:259-306:1981.Applicant
- Ballas et al., Liposomes bearing a quaternary ammonium detergent as an efficient vehicle for functional transfer of TMV-RNA into plant protoplasts, BBA, 939:3-18, 1988.Applicant
- Banks, William A., Are the Extracelluar Pathways A Conduit for the Delivery of Therapeutics to the Brain?, Current Pharmaceutical Design, 10: 1365-1370, 2004.Applicant
- Bard et al., Peripherally administered antibodies against amyloid beta-peptide enter the central nervous system and reduce pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease, Nat. Med., 6:916-919, 2000.Applicant
- Barnes et al., Methods for growth of cultured cells in serum-free medium, Anal. Biochem., 102:255-270, 1980.Applicant
- Begley, Delivery of therapeutic agents to the central nervous system; the problems and the possibilities, Pharmacol. Ther, 104:29-45, 2004.Applicant
- Behr et al., Efficient gene transfer into mammalian primary endocrine cells with lipopolyamine-coated DNA, PNAS USA, 86;6982-6986, 1989.Applicant
- Behr, DNA strongly binds to micelles and vesicles containing lipopolyamines or lipointercalants, Tetrahedron Lett., 27:5861-5864, 1986.Applicant
- Behr, Gene transfer with synthetic cationic amphiphiles: prospects for gene therapy, Bioconj. Chem., 5:382-389, 1994.Applicant
- Better et al., Escherichia coil secretion of an active chimeric antibody fragment, Science, 240:1041-1043, 1988.Applicant
- Bhatnagar et al., Structure-activity relationships of novel hematoregulatory peptides, J. Med. Chem, 39:3814-3819, 1996.Applicant
- Boulianne et al., Production of functional chimaeric mouse/human antibody, Nature, 312:643-646, 1984.Applicant
- Burton et al., Human antibodies from combinatorial libraries, Adv. Immunol., 57:191-280, 1994.Applicant
- Caron et al., Engineered humanized dimeric forms of IgG are more effective antibodies, J. Exp. Med., 176:1191-1195, 1992.Applicant
- Carpenter et al., Interactions of stabilizing additives with proteins during freeze-thawing and freeze-drying, Dev. Biol. Standardization, 74:225-239, 1991.Applicant
- Carter et al., High level Escherichia coil expression and production of a bivalent humanized antibody fragment, Biotechnology, 10:163-167, 1992.Applicant
- Cassett et al., A peptide mimetic of an anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody by rational design, Biochemical and Biophysicai Research Communciations, vol. 307, pp. 198-205, 2003.Applicant
- Caton et al., Influenza virus hemagglutinin-specific antibodies isolated from a combinatorial expression library are closely related to the immune response of the donor, PNAS USA, 87:6450-6454, 1990.Applicant
- Chen, Formulation concern of protein drugs, Drug Dev. Indust. Pharm., 18:1311-1354, 1992.Applicant
- Cherny et al,, Treatment with a copper-zinc chelator markedly and rapidly inhibits beta-amyloid accumulation in Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice, Neuron, 30:665-666, 2001.Applicant
- Chothia et al., Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins, J. Mol. Biol., 196:901-917, 1987.Applicant
- Chung et al., Uptake, degradation, and release of fibrillar and soluble forms of Alzheimer's amyloid beta-peptide by microglial cells, J. Biol. Chem., 274:32301-32308, 1999.Applicant
- Clackson et al., In vitro selection from protein and peptide libraries, Trends Biotechnol., 12:173-184, 1984.Applicant
- Clackson et al., Making antibody fragments using phage display libraries, Nature, 352:624-628, 1991.Applicant
- Co et al., A humanized antibody specific for the platelet integrin gpllb/llla, J. Immunol., 152:2968-2976, 1994.Applicant
- Cunningham et al., High-resolution epitope mapping of hGH-receptor interactions by alanine-scanning mutagenesis, Science, 244:1081-1085, 1989.Applicant
- Cuthbertson et al., Design of low molecular weight hematoregulatory agents from the structure-activity relationship of a dimeric pentapeptide, J. Med. Chem., 40:2876-2882, 1997.Applicant
- Davies et al., Affinity improvement of single antibody VH domains: residues in all three hypervariable regions affect antigen binding, Immunotechnology, 2:169-179, 1996.Applicant
- Demattos et al., Peripheral anti-A beta antibody alters CNS and plasma A beta clearance and decreases brain A beta burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, PNAS USA, 93:8850-3855, 2001.Applicant
- Doody, Therapeutic standards in Alzheimer disease, Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord., 13:S20-S26, 1999.Applicant
- Edge et al., Deglycosylation of glycoproteins by trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, Anal. Biochem., 118:131-137, 1981.Applicant
- Evan et al., Isolation of monoclonal antibodies specific for human c-myc proto-oncogene product, Mol. Cell. Biol., 5:3610-3616, 1985.Applicant
- Fassbender et al., Simvastatin strongly reduces levels of Alzheimer's disease β-amyloid peptides Aβ42 and Aβ40 in vitro and in vivo, PNAS, 98:5856-5861, 2000.Applicant
- Felgner et al., Lipofection: a highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure, PNAS USA, 84:7413-7417, 1987.Applicant
- Fermér et al., Specificity rescue and affinity maturation of a low-affinity IgM antibody against pro-gastrin-releasing peptide using phage display and DNA shuffline, Tumor Biol., 25:7-13, 2004.Applicant
- Field et al., Purification of a RAS-responsive adenylyl cyclase complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by use of an epitope addition method, Mol. Cell. Biol., 3:2159-2165, 1988.Applicant
- Friedmann, Progress toward human gene therapy, Science, 244:1275-1281, 1989.Applicant
- Gervais et al., A low molecular weight GAG mimetic compound reduces brain amyloid burden in hAPP transgenic mice, 7th International Geneva/Springfield Symposium on Advances in Alzheimer Therapy, 2002.Applicant
- Golde et al., Cholesterol modulation as an emerging strategy for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, Drug Discov. Today, 6:1049-1055, 2001.Applicant
- Golde, Todd E., Alzheimer disease therapy: Can the amyloid cascade be halted?, The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 111 (1): 11-18, 2003.Applicant
- Graham et al., Characteristics of a human cell line transformed by DNA from human adenovirus type 5, J. Gen. Virol., 36:59-74, 1977.Applicant
- Guss et al., EMBO J., 5:1567-1575, 1986.Applicant
- Ham et al., Media and growth requirements, Methods Enzymol., 58:44-93, 1979.Applicant
- Hardy et al., Amyloid deposition as the central event in the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 23:333-388, 1991.Applicant
- Hollinger et al., “Diabodies”: small bivalent and bispecific antibody fragments, PNAS USA, 90:6444-6448, 1993.Applicant
- Holt et al., Domain antibodies: proteins for therapy, Trends Biotechnol., 21:484-490, 2003.Applicant
- Hoogenboom et al., By-passing immunization: human antibodies from synthetic repertoires of germline VH gene segments rearranged in vitro, J. Mol. Biol., 227:381-388, 1991.Applicant
- Ito et al., Synthetic cationic anlphiphiles for liposome-mediated DNA transfection, Biochem, Int., 22:235-241, 1990.Applicant
- Jermutus et al., Tailoring in vitro evolution for protein affinity or stability, PNAS USA, 98:75-80, 2001.Applicant
- Jespers et al., Guiding the selection of hurnan antibodies from phage display repertoires to a single epitope of an antigen, Biotechnology, 12:899-903, 1994.Applicant
- Jick et al., Statins and the risk of dementia, Lancet, 356:1627-1631, 2000.Applicant
- Joachim et al., The seminal role of β-amyloid in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease, Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord., 6:7-34, 1992.Applicant
- Jones et al., Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse, Nature, 321:522-525, 1986.Applicant
- Kettleborough et al., Humanization of a mouse monoclonal antibody by CDR-grafting: the importance of framework residues on loop conformation, Protein Eng., 4:773-783, 1991.Applicant
- Kilpatrick et al., Rapid development of affinity matured monoclonal antibodies using RIMMS, Hybridoma, 16:381-389, 1997.Applicant
- Kirschner et al., Synthetic peptide homologous to beta protein from Alzheimer disease forms amyloid-like fibrils in vitro, PNAS USA, 84:6953-6957, 1987.Applicant
- Köhler et al., Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity, Nature, 256:495-497, 1975.Applicant
- Kowall et al., An in vivo model for the neurodegenerative effects of Beta amyloid and by substance P, Proc. Natl. Acad, Sci. USA, 88: 7247-7251, 1991.Applicant
- Kozbor, A human hybrid myeloma for production of human monoclonal antibodies, J. Immunol., 133:3001-3005, 1984.Applicant
- Letsinger, Cholesteryl-conjugated oligonucleotides: synthesis, properties, and activity as inhibitors of replication of human immunodeficiency virus in cell culture, PNAS USA, 86:6553-6556, 1989.Applicant
- Leventis et al., Interactions of mammalian cells with lipid dispersions containing novel metabolizable cationic amphiphiles, Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 1023:124-132, 1990.Applicant
- Lichtlen et al., “Antibody-based approaches in Alzheimer's research: safety, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and analytical tools”, Journal of Neurochemistry, 104: 859-874 (2008).Applicant
- Lindmark et al., Binding of immunoglobulins to protein A and immunoglobulin levels in mammalian sera, J. Immunol. Methods, 62;1-13, 1983.Applicant
- Lowman, Bacteriophage display and discovery of peptide leads for drug development, Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 26:401-424, 1997.Applicant
- Malone et al., Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection, PNAS USA, 86:6077-6081, 1989.Applicant
- Marks et al., By-passing immunization: human antibodies from V-gene libraries displayed on phage, J. Mol. Biol., 222:581-597, 1991.Applicant
- Mather et al., Culture of testicular cats in hormone-supplemented serum-free medium, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 383:44-68, 1982.Applicant
- Mather, Establishment and characterization of two distinct mouse testicular epithelial cell lines, Biol. Reprod, 23:243-251, 1980.Applicant
- McGeer et al., Inflammation, autotoxicity and Alzheimer disease, Neurobiol. Aging, 22:799-889, 2001.Applicant
- Miller, Human gene therapy comes of age, Nature, 357:455-460, 1992.Applicant
- Misra et al., Drug delivery to the central nevous sysem: a review, J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci., 6:252-273, 2003.Applicant
- Morrison et al., Chimeric human antibody molecules: mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains, PNAS USA, 81:6851-6855, 1984.Applicant
- Morrison et al., Genetically engineered antibody molecules, Adv. Immunol., 44:65-92, 1988.Applicant
- Ohmori et al., The enhancing effect of anionic alpha-helical peptide on cationic peptide-mediating transfection systems, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 235:726-729, 1997.Applicant
- Paborsky et al., Mammalian Cell transient expression of tissue factor for the production of antigen, Protein Eng., 3:547-553, 1990.Applicant
- Padlan, A possible procedure for reducing the immunogenicity of antibody variable domains while preserving their ligand-binding properties, Molec. Immunol., 28;489-498, 1991.Applicant
- Padlan, Anatomy of the antibody molecule, Molec. Immunol., 31:169-217, 1994.Applicant
- Pan et al., Efficient transfer of receptor-associated protein (RAP) across the blood-brain barrier, J. Cell Sci., 117:5071-5078, 2004.Applicant
- Pan et al., Why study transport of peptides and proteins at the neurovascular interface?, Brain Res. Rev., 46:32-43, 2004.Applicant
- Parasce et al., Slow degradation of aggregates of the Alzheimer's disease amyloid beta-protein by microglial cells, J. Biol. Chem., 272:29390-29397, 1997.Applicant
- Park et al., Metabolic impairment induces oxidative stress, compromises inflammatory responses, and inactivates a key mitochondrial enzyme in microglia, J. Neurochem., 72:1948-1958, 1999.Applicant
- Paul, Fundamental Immunology, (textbook), pp. 292-295, 1993.Applicant
- Pinnaduwage et al., Use of a quaternary ammonium detergent in liposome mediated DNA transfection of mouse L-cells, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 985:33-37, 1989.Applicant
- Poduslo et al., Amyloid β peptide as a vaccine for Alzheimer's disease involves receptor-mediated transport at the blood-brain barrier, Clin. Neurosci., 12:3197-3200, 2001.Applicant
- Poduslo et al., Design and chemical synthesis of a magnetic resonance contrast agent with enhanced in vitro binding, high blood-brain barrier permeability, and in vivo targeting to Alzheimer's disease amyloid plaques, Biochem., 43:6064-6075, 2004.Applicant
- Pollard et al., Polyethylenimine but not cationic lipids promotes transgene delivery to the nucleus in mammalian cells, J. Biol. Chem., 273:7507-7511, 1998.Applicant
- Riechmann et al., Reshaping human antibodies for therapy, Nature, 332:323-327, 1988.Applicant
- Rose et al., A new cationic liposome reagent mediating nearly quantitative transfection of animal cells, Biotechniques, 10:520-525, 1991.Applicant
- Rudikoff et al., Single amino acid substitution altering antigen-binding specificity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79:1979-1983, 1982.Applicant
- Sanger et al., DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors, PNAS USA, 74:5463-5467, 1977.Applicant
- Sarmay et al., Mapping and comparison of the interaction sites on the Fc region of IgG responsible for triggering antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) through different types of human Fc gamma receptor, Molec. Immunol., 29:633-639, 1992.Applicant
- Schenk et al., Current progress in beta-amyloid immunotherapy, Curr. Opin. Immunol., 16:599-606, 2004.Applicant
- Schenk et al., Immunization with amyloid-β attenuates Alzheimer-disease-like pathology in the PDAPP mouse, Nature, 400:173-177, 1999.Applicant
- Selkoe, Translating cell biology into therapeutic advances in Alzheimer's disease, Nature, 399:A23-A31, 1999.Applicant
- Shields et al., High resolution mapping of the binding site on human IgG1 for Fc gamma RI, Fc gamma RII, Fc gamma RIII, and FcRn and design of IgG1 variants with improved binding to the Fc gamma R, J. Biol. Chem., 276:6591-6604, 2001.Applicant
- Shopes, A genetically engineered human IgG mutant with enhanced cytolytic activity, J. Immunol., 148:2918-2922, 1992.Applicant
- Sinha et al., Purification and cloning of amyloid precursor protein beta-secretase from human brain, Nature, 402:537-540, 1999.Applicant
- Sisodia et al., A role for the Beta-amyloid precursor protein in memory?, Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 12074-12076, 1998.Applicant
- Skerra et al., Assembly of a functional immunoglobulin Fv fragment in Escherichia coil, Science, 240:1038-1041, 1988.Applicant
- Sojar et al., A chemical method for the deglycosylation of proteins, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 259:52-57, 1987.Applicant
- Soto et al., β-Sheet breaker peptides for the treatment of amyloidosis in Alzheimer disease, 7th International Geneva/Springfield Symposium on Advances in Alzheimer Therapy, 2002.Applicant
- Steinberg, Testing potential Alzheimer vaccines, The Scientist, 16:22-23, 2002.Applicant
- Stevenson et al., A chimeric antibody with dual Fc regions (bisFabFc) prepared by manipulations at the IgG hinge, Anti-cancer Drug Design, 3:219-230, 1989.Applicant
- Studnicka et al., Human-engineered monoclonal antibodies retain full specific binding activity by preserving non-CDR complementarity-modulating residues, Protein Eng., 7:805-814, 1994.Applicant
- Thotakura et al., Enzymatic deglycosylation of glycoproteins, Methods Enzymol., 138:350-359, 1987.Applicant
- Urlaub et al., Isolation of Chinese hamster cell mutants deficient in dihydrofolate reductase activity, PNAS USA, 77:4216-4220, 1980.Applicant
- Vajdos et al., Comprehensive functional maps of the antigen-binding site of an anti-ErbB2 antibody obtained with shotgun scanning mutagenesis, Journal of Molecular biology, vol. 320, pp. 415-428, 2002.Applicant
- Verhoeyer et al., Reshaping human antibodies: grafting an antilysozyme activity, Science, 239:1534-1536, 1988.Applicant
- Verma, Gene therapy, Sci. Am., 263:68-84, 1990.Applicant
- Vinters, Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a critical review, Stroke, 18:311-324, 1987.Applicant
- Watkins, Screening of phage-expressed antibody libraries by capture lift, Methods Molec. Biol., 178:187-193, 2002.Applicant
- Williams et al., The lyophilizaton of pharmaceuticals: a literature review, J. Parenter. Sci. Tech., 38:48-59, 1984.Applicant
- Winter et al., Making antibodies by phage display technology, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 12:433-455, 1994.Applicant
- Wolff et al., Monoclonal antibody homodimers: enhanced antitumor activity in nude mice, Cancer Res., 53:2560-2565, 1993.Applicant
- Wolozin et al., Decreased prevalence of Alzheimer disease associated with 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, Arch. Neurol., 57:1439-1443, 2000.Applicant
- Yan et al., Immunocytochemical localization of TrkB in the central nervous system of the adult rat., J. Comp. Neurol., 378:135-157, 1997.Applicant
- Younkin, The role of A beta 42 in Alzheimer's disease, J. Physiol., 92:289-292, 1998.Applicant
- Zapata et al., Engineering linear F(ab')2 fragments for efficient production in Escherichia coli and enhanced antiproliferative activity, Protein Eng., 8:1057-1062, 1995.Applicant
- Zhou et al., Lipophilic polylysines mediate efficient DNA transfection in mammalian cells, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1065:8-14, 1991.Applicant
- Internatonal Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2006/002259, International Bureau of WIPO. mated Jul. 24, 2007.Applicant
- International Search Report, PCT/US2006/002259, European Patent Office, mailed Apr. 7, 2006.Applicant
- Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2006/002259, European Patent Office, mailed Apr. 7, 2006.Applicant
- Tamura, M. et al., “Structural correlates of an anticarcinoma antibody: identification of specificity-determining residues (SDRs) and development of a minimally immunogenic antibody variant by retention of SDRs only”, J of Immunology, 164: 1432-1441 (2000).Applicant