US 8,248,185 B2Grant

Acoustic resonator structure comprising a bridge

Issue Date:2012-08-21

•20 Claims

•8 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

An acoustic resonator comprises a first electrode a second electrode and a piezoelectric layer disposed between the first and second electrodes. The acoustic resonator further comprises a reflective element disposed beneath the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer. An overlap of the reflective element, the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer comprises an active area of the acoustic resonator. The acoustic resonator also comprises a bridge adjacent to a termination of the active area of the acoustic resonator.

Metadata

Assignee

Avago Technologies Wireless IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.

Inventors

John Choy
Chris Feng
Phil Nikkel

Application Information

Application Number:US 12/490,525

Filing Date:2009-06-24

Priority Date:2009-06-24

Art Unit:2817

Classifications

IPC:

H03H9/15H03H9/13H03H9/52H03H9/54

Patent Drawings (8 sheets)

Description

Background

[0001] In many electronic applications, electrical resonators are used. For example, in many wireless communications devices, radio frequency (rf) and microwave frequency resonators are used as filters to improve reception and transmission of signals. Filters typically include inductors and capacitors, and more recently, resonators.

[0002] As will be appreciated, it is desirable to reduce the size of components of electronic devices. Many known filter technologies present a barrier to overall system miniaturization. With the need to reduce component size, a class of resonators based on the piezoelectric effect has emerged. In piezoelectric-based resonators, acoustic resonant modes are generated in the piezoelectric material. These acoustic waves are converted into electrical waves for use in electrical applications.

[0003] One type of piezoelectric resonator is a Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator (FBAR). The FBAR has the advantage of small size and lends itself to Integrated Circuit (IC) manufacturing tools and techniques. The FBAR includes an acoustic stack comprising, inter alia, a layer of piezoelectric material disposed between two electrodes. Acoustic waves achieve resonance across the acoustic stack, with the resonant frequency of the waves being determined by the materials in the acoustic stack.

[0004] FBARs are similar in principle to bulk acoustic resonators such as quartz, but are scaled down to resonate at GHz frequencies. Because the FBARs have thicknesses on the order of microns and length and width dimensions of hundreds of microns. FBARs beneficially provide a comparatively compact alternative to known resonators.

[0005] Desirably, the bulk acoustic resonator excites only thickness-extensional (TE) modes, which are longitudinal mechanical waves having propagation (k) vectors in the direction of propagation. The TE modes desirably travel in the direction of the thickness (e.g., z-direction) of the piezoelectric layer.

[0006] Unfortunately, besides the desired TE modes there are lateral modes, known as Rayleigh-Lamb modes, generated in the acoustic stack as well. The Rayleigh-Lamb modes are mechanical waves having k-vectors that are perpendicular to the direction of TE modes, the desired modes of operation. These lateral modes travel in the areal dimensions (x, y directions of the present example) of the piezoelectric material. Among other adverse effects, lateral modes deleteriously impact the quality (Q) factor of an FBAR device. In particular, the energy of Rayleigh-Lamb modes is lost at the interfaces of the FBAR device. As will be appreciated, this loss of energy to spurious modes is a loss in energy of desired longitudinal modes, and ultimately a degradation of the Q-factor.

[0007] FBARs comprise an active area, and connections to and from the active area can increase losses, and thereby degrade the Q factor. For example, in transition regions between the active area and the connections, defects may form in the piezoelectric layer during fabrication. These defects can result in acoustic loss, and as a result, a reduction in the Q factor.

[0008] What is needed, therefore, are an acoustic resonator structure and electrical filter that overcomes at least the known shortcomings described above.

Summary

[0009] In accordance with a representative embodiment, an acoustic resonator comprises: a first electrode; a second electrode; a piezoelectric layer disposed between the first and second electrodes; and a reflective element disposed beneath the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer. An overlap of the reflective element, the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer defines an active area of the acoustic resonator. The first electrode substantially covers the reflective element, and the piezoelectric layer extends over an edge of the first electrode. The acoustic resonator also comprises a bridge adjacent to a termination of the active area of the acoustic resonator, and the bridge overlaps a portion of the first electrode.

[0010] In accordance with another representative embodiment, a film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR) comprises: a first electrode; a second electrode; a piezoelectric layer disposed between the first and second electrodes; and a cavity disposed beneath the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer. An overlap of the cavity, the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer defines an active area of the acoustic resonator. The first electrode substantially covers the cavity, and the piezoelectric layer extends over an edge of the first electrode. The FBAR also comprises a bridge adjacent to a termination of the active area of the acoustic resonator. The bridge overlaps a portion of the first electrode.

[0011] In accordance with yet another representative embodiment, a filter element comprises an acoustic resonator. The acoustic resonator comprises: a first electrode; a second electrode; a piezoelectric layer disposed between the first and second electrodes; and a reflective element disposed beneath the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer. An overlap of the reflective element, the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer defines an active area of the acoustic resonator. The first electrode substantially covers the reflective element, and the piezoelectric layer extends over an edge of the first electrode. The acoustic resonator also comprises a bridge adjacent to a termination of the active area of the acoustic resonator, and the bridge overlaps a portion of the first electrode.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0012] The illustrative embodiments are best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawing figures. It is emphasized that the various features are not necessarily drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions may be arbitrarily increased or decreased for clarity of discussion. Wherever applicable and practical, like reference numerals refer to like elements.

[0013] FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of an acoustic resonator in accordance with a representative embodiment.

[0014] FIG. 2 shows a top view of an acoustic resonator in accordance with a representative embodiment.

[0015] FIG. 3 shows a graph of the Q-factor versus a spacing between the air-bridge and the lower electrode of an FBAR in accordance with a representative embodiment.

[0016] FIG. 4 shows a graph of the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) versus a spacing between the air-bridge and the lower electrode of an acoustic resonator in accordance with a representative embodiment.

[0017] FIG. 5 shows a cross-sectional view of an FBAR in accordance with a representative embodiment.

[0018] FIG. 6 shows a graph of the parallel impedance (Rp) for FBARs, including certain FBARs of representative embodiments.

[0019] FIG. 7 shows a graph of the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) for FBARs, including certain FBARs of representative embodiments.

Defined Terminology

[0020] It is to be understood that the terminology used herein is for purposes of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. The defined terms are in addition to the technical and scientific meanings of the defined terms as commonly understood and accepted in the technical field of the present teachings.

[0021] As used in the specification and appended claims, the terms ‘a’, ‘an’ and ‘the’ include both singular and plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, ‘a device’ includes one device and plural devices.

[0022] As used in the specification and appended claims, and in addition to their ordinary meanings, the terms ‘substantial’ or ‘substantially’ mean to within acceptable limits or degree. For example, ‘substantially cancelled’ means that one skilled in the art would consider the cancellation to be acceptable.

[0023] As used in the specification and the appended claims and in addition to its ordinary meaning, the term ‘approximately’ means to within an acceptable limit or amount to one having ordinary skill in the art. For example, ‘approximately the same’ means that one of ordinary skill in the art would consider the items being compared to be the same.

Detailed Description

[0024] In the following detailed description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of illustrative embodiments according to the present teachings. However, it will be apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art having had the benefit of the present disclosure that other embodiments according to the present teachings that depart from the specific details disclosed herein remain within the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, descriptions of well-known apparati and methods may be omitted so as to not obscure the description of the illustrative embodiments. Such methods and apparati are clearly within the scope of the present teachings.

[0025] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of an acoustic resonator 100 in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. Illustratively, the acoustic resonator 100 is an FBAR structure. The acoustic resonator 100 comprises a substrate 101. A first electrode 102 is disposed over the substrate 101. A piezoelectric layer 103 is disposed over the first electrode 102. A second electrode 104 is disposed over the first electrode 102. The piezoelectric layer 103 has a first surface in contact with the first electrode 102 and a second surface in contact with the second electrode 104. The first and second electrodes 102, 104 include an electrically conductive material and provide an oscillating electric field in the y-direction, which is the direction of the thickness of the piezoelectric layer 103. In the present illustrative embodiment, the y-axis is the axis for the TE (longitudinal) mode(s) for the resonator.

[0026] The piezoelectric layer 103 and first and second electrodes 102,104 are suspended over a cavity 105 formed by selective etching of the substrate 101. The cavity 105 may be formed by a number of known methods, for example as described in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,384,697 to Ruby, et al. The region of overlap of the first and second electrodes 102, 104, the piezoelectric layer 103 and the cavity 105 is referred to as the active area of the acoustic resonator 100. Accordingly, the acoustic resonator 100 is a mechanical resonator, which can be electrically coupled via the piezoelectric layer 103. Other suspension schemes that foster mechanical resonance by FBARs are contemplated. For example, the acoustic resonator 100 can be located over a mismatched acoustic Bragg reflector (not shown) formed in or on the substrate 101. This type of FBAR is sometimes referred to as a solid mount resonator (SMR) and, for example, may be as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,721 to Lakin, the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated into this disclosure by reference in its entirety.

[0027] By contrast, an inactive area of the acoustic resonator 100 comprises a region of overlap between first electrode 102, or second electrode 104, or both, and the piezoelectric layer 103 not disposed over the cavity 105 or other suspension structure. As described more fully below, it is beneficial to the performance of the resonator to reduce the area of the inactive region of the acoustic resonator 100 to the extent practical.

[0028] When connected in a selected topology, a plurality of acoustic resonators 100 can act as an electrical filter. For example, the acoustic resonators 100 may be arranged in a ladder-filter arrangement, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,910,756 to Ella, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,262,637 to Bradley, et al. The electrical filters may be used in a number of applications, such as in duplexers.

[0029] The acoustic resonator 100 may be fabricated according to known semiconductor processing methods and using known materials. Illustratively, the acoustic resonator 100 may be fabricated according to the teachings of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,587,620; 5,873,153; 6,384,697; 6,507,983; and 7,275,292 to Ruby, et al.; and 6,828,713 to Bradley, et. al. The disclosures of these patents are specifically incorporated herein by reference. It is emphasized that the methods and materials described in these patents are representative and other methods of fabrication and materials within the purview of one of ordinary skill in the art are contemplated.

[0030] The acoustic resonator 100 also comprises a bridge 106 provided on a side of the acoustic resonator 100 that connects to a contact 107. The contact 107 is connected to a signal line (not shown) and electronic components (not shown) are selected for the particular application of the acoustic resonator 100. This portion of the acoustic resonator 100 is often referred to as the interconnection side of the acoustic resonator 100. By contrast, the second electrode 104 terminates at a position 108 over the cavity 105 in order to minimize the inactive area of the acoustic resonator 100 as described below. The position 108 opposes the interconnection side of the acoustic resonator 100.

[0031] The bridge 106 comprises a gap 109 formed beneath a portion of the second electrode 104. Illustratively, and as described below, after removal of a sacrificial layer (not shown) provided in the formation of the gap 109, the gap 109 comprises air. However, the gap 109 may comprise other materials including low acoustic impedance materials, such as carbon (C) doped SiO₂, which is also referred as Black-diamond; or dielectric resin commercially known as SiLK; or benzocyclobutene (BCB). Such low acoustic impedance materials may be provided in the gap 109 by known methods. The low acoustic impedance material may be provided after removal of sacrificial material used to form the gap 109 (as described below), or may be used instead of the sacrificial material in the gap 109, and not removed.

[0032] In a representative embodiment, the bridge 106 is formed by providing a sacrificial layer (not shown) over the first electrode 102 and a portion of the piezoelectric layer 103 on the interconnection side and forming the second electrode 104 over the sacrificial layer. Illustratively, the sacrificial material comprises phosphosilicate glass (PSG), which illustratively comprises 8% phosphorous and 92% silicon dioxide. Subsequent layers such as the piezoelectric layer 103 and the second electrode 104 are deposited, sequentially, upon the PSG until the final structure is developed. Notably a seed layer (not shown) may be provided over the first electrode 102 before depositing the piezoelectric layer 103, and a passivation layer (not shown) may be deposited over the second electrode 104. After the formation of the structure comprising the bridge 106, the PSG sacrificial layer is etched away illustratively with hydrofluoric acid leaving the free-standing bridge 106. In a representative embodiment, the sacrificial layer disposed in the cavity 105 and the sacrificial layer beneath the bridge 106 are removed in the same process step, with the latter leaving the gap 109 comprising air.

[0033] The piezoelectric layer 103 comprises a transition 110 formed during the formation of the piezoelectric layer 103 over the first electrode 102 and the substrate 101. The piezoelectric layer 103 at the transition 110 often comprises material defects and voids, particularly structural defects such as lattice defects and voids. These defects and voids can result in losses of acoustic energy of the mechanical waves propagating in the piezoelectric material. As should be appreciated, acoustic energy loss results in a reduction in the Q-factor of the acoustic resonator 100. However, and as described below, by separating the second electrode 104 from the piezoelectric layer 103 in a region 111 of the gap 109 where the transition 110 occurs, the portion of the active region of the acoustic resonator 100 necessarily does not include the transition 110 of the piezoelectric layer 103 that includes the defects and voids therein. As a result, acoustic losses due to the defects and voids in the piezoelectric layer 103 at the transition 110 are reduced and the Q-factor is improved compared to known resonators, such as known FBARs.

[0034] Additionally, and beneficially, the bridge 106 provides an acoustic impedance mismatch at the boundary of the active region on the interconnection side of the acoustic resonator 100. This acoustic impedance mismatch results in the reflection of acoustic waves at the boundary that may otherwise propagate out of the active region and be lost, resulting in energy loss. By preventing such losses, the bridge 106 results in an increased Q-factor in the acoustic resonator 100. Moreover, the termination of the second electrode 104 at position 108 terminates the active region of the acoustic resonator 100 and reduces losses by creating an acoustic impedance mismatch. This also provides an improvement in the Q-factor.

[0035] In addition to terminating the active region of the acoustic resonator 100 before the transition 110, the bridge 106 also reduces the area of an inactive region of the acoustic resonator 100. The inactive region of the FBAR 100 creates a parasitic capacitance, which in an equivalent circuit is electrically in parallel with the intrinsic capacitance of the active region of the FBAR. This parasitic capacitance degrades the effective coupling coefficient (kt²), and therefore it is beneficial to reduce the parasitic capacitance. Reducing the area of the inactive region reduces the parasitic capacitance, and thereby improves the effective coupling coefficient (kt²).

[0036] FIG. 1 also shows a first line 112 and a second line 113 separated by a distance ‘d.’ The distance ‘d’ represents the distance between the edge of the first electrode 102 at the first line 112 (arbitrarily selected as x=0 for this discussion) to the beginning point of the bridge 106 at the second line 113. As the position of the second line 113 becomes larger (more negative), the Q-factor increases. The effective coupling coefficient (kt²) also increases with separation of first and second lines 112, 113 to an extent. Thus, the selection of a particular distance ‘d’ results in an improvement in Q due to reduced acoustic losses due to the reduction in the inactive FBAR area and the improvement in kt²from the reduction of the parasitic capacitance.

[0037] FIG. 2 shows a top view of the acoustic resonator 100 of FIG. 1. Notably, the cross-sectional view of the acoustic resonator 100 shown in FIG. 1 is taken along the line 1-1. The second electrode 104 of the present embodiment is apodized to reduce acoustic losses. Further details of the use of apodization in acoustic resonators may be found in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,215,375 to Larson III, et al; or in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,629,865 entitled “Piezoelectric Resonator Structures and Electrical Filters” filed May 31, 2006, to Richard C. Ruby. The disclosures of U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,215,375 and 7,629,865 are specifically incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

[0038] The fundamental mode of the acoustic resonator 100 is the longitudinal extension mode or “piston” mode. This mode is excited by the application of a time-varying voltage to the two electrodes at the resonant frequency of the acoustic resonator 100. The piezoelectric material converts energy in the form of electrical energy into mechanical energy. In an ideal FBAR having infinitesimally thin electrodes, resonance occurs when the applied frequency is equal to the velocity of sound of the piezoelectric medium divided by twice the thickness of the piezoelectric medium: f=v_ac(2*T), where T is the thickness of the piezoelectric medium and v_acis the acoustic phase velocity. For resonators with finite thickness electrodes, this equation is modified by the weighted acoustic velocities and thicknesses of the electrodes.

[0039] A quantitative and qualitative understanding of the Q of a resonator may be obtained by plotting on a Smith Chart the ratio of the reflected energy to applied energy as the frequency is varied for the case in which one electrode is connected to ground and another to signal, for an FBAR resonator with an impedance equal to the system impedance at the resonant frequency. As the frequency of the applied energy is increased, the magnitude/phase of the FBAR resonator sweeps out a circle on the Smith Chart. This is referred to as the Q-circle. Where the Q-circle first crosses the real axes (horizontal axes), this corresponds to the series resonance frequency f_s. The real impedance (as measured in Ohms) is R_s. As the Q-circle continues around the perimeter of the Smith chart, it again crosses the real axes. The second point at which the Q circle crosses the real axis is labeled f_p, the parallel or anti-resonant frequency of the FBAR. The real impedance at f_pis R_p.

[0040] Often it is desirable to minimize R_swhile maximizing R_p. Qualitatively, the closer the Q-circle “hugs” the outer rim of the Smith chart, the higher the Q-factor of the device. The Q-circle of an ideal lossless resonator would have a radius of one and would be at the edge of the Smith chart. However, as noted above, there are energy losses that impact the Q of the device. For instance, and in addition to the sources of acoustic losses mentioned above, Rayleigh-Lamb (lateral or spurious) modes are in the x,y dimensions of the piezoelectric layer 103. These lateral modes are due to interfacial mode conversion of the longitudinal mode traveling in the z-direction; and due to the creation of non-zero propagation vectors, k_xand k_y, for both the TE mode and the various lateral modes (e.g., the S0 mode and the zeroth and first flexure modes, A0 and A1), which are due to the difference in effective velocities between the regions where electrodes are disposed and the surrounding regions of the resonator where there are no electrodes.

[0041] Regardless of their source, the lateral modes are parasitic in many resonator applications. For example, the parasitic lateral modes couple at the interfaces of the resonator and remove energy available for the longitudinal modes and thereby reduce the Q-factor of the resonator device. Notably, as a result of parasitic lateral modes and other acoustic losses sharp reductions in Q can be observed on a Q-circle of the Smith Chart of the S₁₁parameter. These sharp reductions in Q-factor are known as “rattles” or “loop-de-loops,” which are shown and described in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,280,007, referenced below.

[0042] As described more fully in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,215,375 and 7,629,865, the apodized first and second electrodes 102, 104 cause reflections of the lateral modes at the interfaces of the resonator to interfere non-constructively, and therefore reduce the magnitude of lateral modes which otherwise result in more viscous energy dissipation. Beneficially, because these lateral modes are not coupled out of the resonator and developed to higher magnitude, energy loss can be mitigated with at least a portion of the reflected lateral modes being converted to longitudinal modes through mode conversion. Ultimately, this results in an overall improvement in the Q-factor.

[0043] FIG. 3 shows a graph of the Q-factor versus a spacing (‘d’ in FIG. 1) between the bridge 106 and the first electrode 102 of acoustic resonator 100 in accordance with a representative embodiment. When the spacing ‘d’ is selected to be zero, second line 113 is aligned with first line 112, and the region 111 is eliminated. When the spacing ‘d’ is selected to be positive, the second line 113 now has a positive x-coordinate (i.e., second line 113 is located to the right of first line 112 in FIG. 1). In either case, the acoustic losses due to defects in the transition 110 and a comparative increase in the area of the inactive region of the acoustic resonator 100 combine to result in a Q-factor that is comparatively low. By contrast, when the spacing d is selected to be ‘negative’ the inactive area is decreased (i.e., second line 113 is located to the left of first line 112 in FIG. 1), with the bridge 106 and region 111 comprising a comparatively increased dimension. As can be seen in region 302 of FIG. 3, the Q-factor increases to a maximum value at 303. As should be appreciated, the reduction in the inactive area of the acoustic resonator 100 on the interconnection side of the acoustic resonator 100, and the forming of the region 111 results in a decrease in losses due to defects and an acoustic impedance mismatch at the boundary of the active region of the acoustic resonator 100 at the interconnection side of the acoustic resonator 100.

[0044] FIG. 4 shows a graph of the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) versus a spacing (‘d’ in FIG. 1) between the air-bridge (e.g., 106) and the lower electrode (e.g., 102) of an acoustic resonator 100 in accordance with a representative embodiment. When the spacing is selected to be zero, second line 113 is aligned with first line 112 and the region 111 is eliminated. When the spacing ‘d’ is selected to be positive, the second line 113 now has a positive x-coordinate (i.e., second line 113 is to the right of first line 112 in FIG. 1). In either case, the area of the inactive region results in an increase in the parasitic capacitance. This increased parasitic capacitance provides a comparatively reduced effective coupling coefficient (kt²) as shown in region 401 of FIG. 4. By contrast, when the spacing d is selected to be ‘negative’ (i.e., second line 113 is to the left of first line 112 in FIG. 1) the inactive area is decreased, with the bridge 106 and region 111 increasing in dimension. This results in a reduction in the parasitic capacitance, and a comparative increase in the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) as shown in region 402 of FIG. 4. A maximum value of the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) is reached at 403 in FIG. 4. In region 404 of FIG. 4, the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) begins to drop. Likely, this is due to the fact that region 111 further increases over cavity 105, resulting in an increase in the area of the parasitic capacitor formed by the bridge 106 and the gap 109, thus increasing the parasitic capacitance in parallel with the intrinsic capacitance of the acoustic resonator 100. Moreover, as region 111 increases within cavity 105, the active resonator area also decreases, resulting in a decrease in kt². Accordingly, in region 404, the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) decreases as region 111 increases. As should be appreciated from the discussion of FIGS. 3 and 4, the selection of the distance ‘d’ in FIG. 1 allows for the selection of an acceptable increase in both the Q-factor and the effective coupling coefficient (kt²).

[0045] FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of an acoustic resonator 500 in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. The acoustic resonator 500, which is illustratively an FBAR, shares many common features with the acoustic resonator 100 described previously. Many of these common details are not repeated in order to avoid obscuring the presently described embodiments.

[0046] The acoustic resonator 500 comprises a selective recess 501 (often referred to as an ‘innie’) and a frame element 502 (also referred to as an ‘outie’). The recess 501 and frame element 502 provide an acoustic mismatch at the perimeter of the second electrode 104, improve signal reflections and reduce acoustic losses. Ultimately, reduced losses translate into an improved Q-factor of the device. While the recess 501 and the frame element 502 are shown on the second electrode 104, these features may instead be provided on the first electrode 102, or selectively on both the first and second electrodes 102,104. Further details of the use, formation and benefits of the recess 501 and the frame element 502 are found for example, in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,280,007 entitled “Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator with a Mass Loaded Perimeter” to Feng, et al.; and commonly owned U.S. Patent Application Publication 20070205850 entitled “Piezoelectric Resonator Structure and Electronic Filters having Frame Elements” to Jamneala, et al. The disclosures of this patent and patent application publication are specifically incorporated herein by reference.

[0047] FIG. 6 shows a graph of the impedance Rp at parallel resonance for FBARs, including certain acoustic resonators of representative embodiments. Notably, Rp of a known resonator is shown at 601; Rp of an acoustic resonator comprising the bridge 106 (e.g., acoustic resonator 100 of FIG. 1) is shown at 602; Rp of an acoustic resonator comprising recesses and frame elements (with no bridge) is shown at 603; and Rp of an acoustic resonator comprising both the bridge 106, and the recess 501 and the frame element 502 (e.g., acoustic resonator 500 of FIG. 5) is shown at 604.

[0048] The known resonator typically has Rp (shown at 601) of approximately 2000 Ohm. The addition of a recess and a frame element in a known FBAR increases Rp by approximately 1 kΩ as shown at 602. Similarly, the addition of the bridge 106 but not the recess 501 and or the frame element 502 increases Rp by approximately 1 kΩ as shown at 603. However, when adding combined features of the bridge 106 and the recess 501 and frame element 502, the overall parallel resonance Rp improves by nearly 3 kΩ (over that of the known resonator) as shown at 604. Accordingly, the bridge 106, and the recess 501 and frame element 502 provide a synergistic increase in the parallel resonance Rp, as is evident by a comparison of 601 and 604 in FIG. 6. It is beneficial to have comparatively high Rp in FBARs to provide comparatively low insertion loss and comparatively ‘fast’ roll off filters comprising such FBARs.

[0049] As is known, although the use of recesses such as recess 501 results in a comparatively small increase in the effective coupling coefficient (kt²), there can be a degradation in the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) as a result of the frame elements and recesses. In some applications, it may be useful to mitigate this degradation, even though the improvement in the Q-factor may not be as great. For instance, it is known that the bandwidth of an FBAR filter is related to kt². As such, a degradation of kt²can reduce the bandwidth of the FBAR filter. Certain representative embodiments described presently provide somewhat of a trade-off of an acceptable Q-factor and an acceptable degradation of kt².

[0050] FIG. 7 shows a graph of the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) for FBARs, including certain acoustic resonators of representative embodiments. The effective coupling coefficient (kt²) of a known resonator is shown at 701; the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) of an acoustic resonator comprising bridge 106 (e.g., acoustic resonator 100 of FIG. 1) is shown at 702; the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) a known acoustic resonator comprising a recess and a frame element (but with no bridge) is shown at 703; and the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) of an acoustic resonator comprising both a bridge 106, and the recess 501 and the frame element 502 (e.g., acoustic resonator 500 of FIG. 5) is shown at 704.

[0051] The effective coupling coefficient (kt²) of the known resonator is approximately 5.3 as shown at 701. The addition of the bridge 106 improves the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) to 5.4 as shown at 702. However, adding recesses and frame elements and no airbridge will result in an effective coupling coefficient (kt²) of approximately 5.15 as shown at 703. Finally, incorporating the bridge 106, the recess 501 and the frame element 502 result in an effective coupling coefficient (kt²) (shown at 704) that is substantially the same as the known FBAR. Thus, the positive impact on the effective coupling coefficient (kt²) from the bridge 106 must be contrasted with the negative impact of recesses and frame elements on the effective coupling coefficient (kt²).

[0052] In accordance with illustrative embodiments, acoustic resonators for various applications such as in electrical filters are described having a bridge. One of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that many variations that are in accordance with the present teachings are possible and remain within the scope of the appended claims. These and other variations would become clear to one of ordinary skill in the art after inspection of the specification, drawings and claims herein. The invention therefore is not to be restricted except within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims

The invention claimed is:

1. An acoustic resonator, comprising:

a first electrode;

a second electrode;

a piezoelectric layer disposed between the first and second electrodes;

a reflective element disposed beneath the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer, an overlap of the reflective element, the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer defining an active area of the acoustic resonator, wherein the first electrode substantially covers the reflective element, and the piezoelectric layer extends over an edge of the first electrode; and

a bridge adjacent to a termination of the active area of the acoustic resonator, wherein the bridge overlaps a portion of the first electrode.

2. An acoustic resonator as claimed in claim 1, further comprising an electrical connection to one of a plurality of sides of the second electrode, wherein the bridge is disposed between the connection and the one side of the second electrode.

3. An acoustic resonator as claimed in claim 1, wherein adjacent to termination of the active area of the acoustic resonator, the piezoelectric layer comprises a transition comprising defects.

4. An acoustic resonator as claimed in claim 3, wherein the second electrode does not contact the transition.

5. An acoustic resonator as claimed in claim 1, wherein the bridge comprises a gap.

6. An acoustic resonator as claimed in claim 5, wherein the gap comprises a region between the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer.

7. An acoustic resonator as claimed in claim 6, wherein adjacent to termination of the active area of the acoustic resonator, the piezoelectric layer comprises a transition comprising defects, and the transition is disposed beneath the region of the gap.

8. An acoustic resonator as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second electrode comprises an upper surface with a side and a recess is disposed along the side.

9. An acoustic resonator as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second electrode comprises an upper surface with a side, and a frame element is disposed along the side.

10. A film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR), comprising:

a first electrode;

a second electrode;

a piezoelectric layer disposed between the first and second electrodes;

a cavity disposed beneath the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer, an overlap of the cavity, the first electrode, the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer defining an active area of the acoustic resonator, wherein the first electrode substantially covers the cavity, and the piezoelectric layer extends over an edge of the first electrode; and

a bridge adjacent to a termination of the active area of the acoustic resonator, wherein the bridge overlaps a portion of the first electrode.

11. An FBAR as claimed in claim 10, further comprising an electrical connection to one of a plurality of sides of the second electrode, wherein the bridge is disposed between the connection and the one side of the second electrode.

12. An FBAR as claimed in claim 10, wherein adjacent to termination of the active area of the acoustic resonator, the piezoelectric layer comprises a transition comprising defects.

13. An FBAR as claimed in claim 12, wherein the second electrode does not contact the transition.

14. An FBAR as claimed in claim 10, wherein the bridge comprises a gap.

15. An FBAR as claimed in claim 14, wherein the gap comprises a region between the second electrode and the piezoelectric layer.

16. An FBAR as claimed in claim 15, wherein adjacent to termination of the active area of the acoustic resonator, the piezoelectric layer comprises a transition comprising defects, and the transition is disposed beneath the region of the gap.

17. An FBAR as claimed in claim 10, wherein the second electrode comprises an upper surface with a side and a recess is disposed along the side.

18. An FBAR as claimed in claim 10, wherein the second electrode comprises an upper surface with a side, and a frame element is disposed along the side.

19. An FBAR as claimed in claim 10, further comprising a low acoustic impedance material beneath the bridge.

20. A filter element comprising an acoustic resonator, the acoustic resonator comprising:

a first electrode;

a second electrode;

a piezoelectric layer disposed between the first and second electrodes;

a bridge adjacent to a termination of the active area of the acoustic resonator, wherein the bridge overlaps a portion of the first electrode.

Patent Citations (523)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US3174122(A)	1965-03-01	Fowler et al.	Applicant
US3189851(A)	1965-06-01	Fowler	Applicant
US3321648(A)	1967-05-01	Kolm	Applicant
US3422371(A)	1969-01-01	Poirier et al.	Applicant
US3568108(A)	1971-03-01	Poirier et al.	Applicant
US3582839(A)	1971-06-01	Pim et al.	Applicant
US3590287(A)	1971-06-01	Berlincourt et al.	Applicant
US3610969(A)	1971-10-01	Clawson et al.	Applicant
US3826931(A)	1974-07-01	Hammond	Applicant
US3845402(A)	1974-10-01	Nupp	Applicant
US4084217(A)	1978-04-01	Brandli et al.	Applicant
US4172277(A)	1979-10-01	Pinson	Applicant
US4272742(A)	1981-06-01	Lewis	Applicant
US4281299(A)	1981-07-01	Newbold	Applicant
US4320365(A)	1982-03-01	Black et al.	Applicant
US4344004(A)	1982-08-01	Okubo	Applicant
US4355408(A)	1982-10-01	Scarrott	Applicant
US4456850(A)	1984-06-01	Inoue et al.	Applicant
US4529904(A)	1985-07-01	Hattersley	Applicant
US4608541(A)	1986-08-01	Moriwaki et al.	Applicant
US4625138(A)	1986-11-01	Ballato	Applicant
US4640756(A)	1987-02-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US4719383(A)	1988-01-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US4769272(A)	1988-09-01	Byrne et al.	Applicant
US4798990(A)	1989-01-01	Henoch	Applicant
US4819215(A)	1989-04-01	Yokoyama et al.	Applicant
US4836882(A)	1989-06-01	Ballato	Applicant
US4841429(A)	1989-06-01	McClanahan et al.	Applicant
US4906840(A)	1990-03-01	Zdeblick et al.	Applicant
US5048036(A)	1991-09-01	Scifres et al.	Applicant
US5048038(A)	1991-09-01	Brennan et al.	Applicant
US5066925(A)	1991-11-01	Freitag	Applicant
US5075641(A)	1991-12-01	Weber et al.	Applicant
US5111157(A)	1992-05-01	Komiak	Applicant
US5118982(A)	1992-06-01	Inoue et al.	Applicant
US5129132(A)	1992-07-01	Zdeblick et al.	Applicant
US5162691(A)	1992-11-01	Mariani et al.	Applicant
US5166646(A)	1992-11-01	Avanic et al.	Applicant
US5185589(A)	1993-02-01	Krishnaswamy et al.	Applicant
US5214392(A)	1993-05-01	Kobayashi et al.	Applicant
US5233259(A)	1993-08-01	Krishnaswamy et al.	Applicant
US5241209(A)	1993-08-01	Sasaki	Applicant
US5241456(A)	1993-08-01	Marcinkiewicz et al.	Applicant
US5262347(A)	1993-11-01	Sands	Applicant
US5270492(A)	1993-12-01	Fukui	Applicant
US5294898(A)	1994-03-01	Dworsky et al.	Applicant
US5361077(A)	1994-11-01	Weber	Applicant
US5382930(A)	1995-01-01	Stokes et al.	Applicant
US5384808(A)	1995-01-01	Van Brunt et al.	Applicant
US5448014(A)	1995-09-01	Kong et al.	Applicant
US5465725(A)	1995-11-01	Seyed-Bolorforosh	Applicant
US5475351(A)	1995-12-01	Uematsu et al.	Applicant
US5548189(A)	1996-08-01	Williams	Applicant
US5567334(A)	1996-10-01	Baker et al.	Applicant
US5587620(A)	1996-12-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US5589858(A)	1996-12-01	Kadowaki et al.	Applicant
US5594705(A)	1997-01-01	Connor et al.	Applicant
US5603324(A)	1997-02-01	Oppelt et al.	Applicant
US5633574(A)	1997-05-01	Sage	Applicant
US5671242(A)	1997-09-01	Takiguchi et al.	Applicant
US5692279(A)	1997-12-01	Mang et al.	Applicant
US5704037(A)	1997-12-01	Chen	Applicant
US5705877(A)	1998-01-01	Shimada	Applicant
US5714917(A)	1998-02-01	Ella	Applicant
US5729008(A)	1998-03-01	Blalock et al.	Applicant
US5789845(A)	1998-08-01	Wadaka et al.	Applicant
US5835142(A)	1998-11-01	Nakamura et al.	Applicant
US5853601(A)	1998-12-01	Krishaswamy et al.	Applicant
US5864261(A)	1999-01-01	Weber	Applicant
US5866969(A)	1999-02-01	Shimada et al.	Applicant
US5872493(A)	1999-02-01	Ella	Applicant
US5873153(A)	1999-02-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US5873154(A)	1999-02-01	Ylilammi et al.	Applicant
US5894184(A)	1999-04-01	Furuhashi et al.	Applicant
US5894647(A)	1999-04-01	Lakin	Applicant
US5910756(A)	1999-06-01	Ella	Applicant
US5932953(A)	1999-08-01	Drees et al.	Applicant
US5936150(A)	1999-08-01	Kobrin et al.	Applicant
US5953479(A)	1999-09-01	Zhou et al.	Applicant
US5955926(A)	1999-09-01	Uda et al.	Applicant
US5962787(A)	1999-10-01	Okada et al.	Applicant
US5969463(A)	1999-10-01	Tomita	Applicant
US5982297(A)	1999-11-01	Welle	Applicant
US6001664(A)	1999-12-01	Swirhun et al.	Applicant
US6016052(A)	2000-01-01	Vaughn	Applicant
US6040962(A)	2000-03-01	Kanazawa et al.	Applicant
US6051907(A)	2000-04-01	Ylilammi	Applicant
US6060818(A)	2000-05-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6087198(A)	2000-07-01	Panasik	Applicant
US6090687(A)	2000-07-01	Merchant et al.	Applicant
US6107721(A)	2000-08-01	Lakin	Applicant
US6111341(A)	2000-08-01	Hirama	Applicant
US6111480(A)	2000-08-01	Iyama et al.	Applicant
US6114795(A)	2000-09-01	Tajima et al.	Applicant
US6118181(A)	2000-09-01	Merchant et al.	Applicant
US6124678(A)	2000-09-01	Bishop et al.	Applicant
US6124756(A)	2000-09-01	Yaklin et al.	Applicant
US6131256(A)	2000-10-01	Dydyk et al.	Applicant
US6150703(A)	2000-11-01	Cushman et al.	Applicant
US6187513(B1)	2001-02-01	Katakura	Applicant
US6198208(B1)	2001-03-01	Yano et al.	Applicant
US6215375(B1)	2001-04-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US6219032(B1)	2001-04-01	Rosenberg et al.	Applicant
US6219263(B1)	2001-04-01	Wuidart	Applicant
US6228675(B1)	2001-05-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6229247(B1)	2001-05-01	Bishop	Applicant
US6252229(B1)	2001-06-01	Hays et al.	Applicant
US6262600(B1)	2001-07-01	Haigh et al.	Applicant
US6262637(B1)	2001-07-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US6263735(B1)	2001-07-01	Nakatani et al.	Applicant
US6265246(B1)	2001-07-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6278342(B1)	2001-08-01	Ella	Applicant
US6284121(B1)	2001-09-01	Reid	Applicant
US6292336(B1)	2001-09-01	Horng et al.	Applicant
US6306755(B1)	2001-10-01	Zheng	Applicant
US6307447(B1)	2001-10-01	Barber et al.	Applicant
US6307761(B1)	2001-10-01	Nakagawa	Applicant
US6335548(B1)	2002-01-01	Roberts et al.	Applicant
US6355498(B1)	2002-03-01	Chan et al.	Applicant
US6366006(B1)	2002-04-01	Boyd	Applicant
US6376280(B1)	2002-04-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6377137(B1)	2002-04-01	Ruby	Applicant
US6384697(B1)	2002-05-01	Ruby	Applicant
US6396200(B2)	2002-05-01	Misu et al.	Applicant
US6407649(B1)	2002-06-01	Tikka et al.	Applicant
US6414569(B1)	2002-07-01	Nakafuku	Applicant
US6420820(B1)	2002-07-01	Larson, III	Applicant
US6424237(B1)	2002-07-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6429511(B2)	2002-08-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6434030(B1)	2002-08-01	Rehm et al.	Applicant
US6437482(B1)	2002-08-01	Shibata	Applicant
US6441539(B1)	2002-08-01	Kitamura et al.	Applicant
US6441702(B1)	2002-08-01	Ella et al.	Applicant
US6462631(B2)	2002-10-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US6466105(B1)	2002-10-01	Lobl et al.	Applicant
US6466418(B1)	2002-10-01	Horng et al.	Applicant
US6469597(B2)	2002-10-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6469909(B2)	2002-10-01	Simmons	Applicant
US6472954(B1)	2002-10-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6476536(B1)	2002-11-01	Pensala	Applicant
US6479320(B1)	2002-11-01	Gooch	Applicant
US6483229(B2)	2002-11-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US6486751(B1)	2002-11-01	Barber et al.	Applicant
US6489688(B1)	2002-12-01	Baumann et al.	Applicant
US6492883(B2)	2002-12-01	Liang et al.	Applicant
US6496085(B2)	2002-12-01	Ella et al.	Applicant
US6498604(B1)	2002-12-01	Jensen	Applicant
US6507983(B1)	2003-01-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6515558(B1)	2003-02-01	Ylilammi	Applicant
US6518860(B2)	2003-02-01	Ella et al.	Applicant
US6525996(B1)	2003-02-01	Miyazawa	Applicant
US6528344(B2)	2003-03-01	Kang	Applicant
US6530515(B1)	2003-03-01	Glenn et al.	Applicant
US6534900(B2)	2003-03-01	Aigner et al.	Applicant
US6542055(B1)	2003-04-01	Frank et al.	Applicant
US6548942(B1)	2003-04-01	Panasik	Applicant
US6548943(B2)	2003-04-01	Kaitila et al.	Applicant
US6549394(B1)	2003-04-01	Williams	Applicant
US6550664(B2)	2003-04-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US6559487(B1)	2003-05-01	Kang et al.	Applicant
US6559530(B2)	2003-05-01	Hinzel et al.	Applicant
US6564448(B1)	2003-05-01	Oura et al.	Applicant
US6566956(B2)	2003-05-01	Ohnishi et al.	Applicant
US6566979(B2)	2003-05-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US6580159(B1)	2003-06-01	Fusaro et al.	Applicant
US6583374(B2)	2003-06-01	Knieser et al.	Applicant
US6583688(B2)	2003-06-01	Klee et al.	Applicant
US6593870(B2)	2003-07-01	Dummermuth et al.	Applicant
US6594165(B2)	2003-07-01	Duerbaum et al.	Applicant
US6600390(B2)	2003-07-01	Frank	Applicant
US6601276(B2)	2003-08-01	Barber	Applicant
US6603182(B1)	2003-08-01	Low et al.	Applicant
US6617249(B2)	2003-09-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6617750(B2)	2003-09-01	Dummermuth et al.	Applicant
US6617751(B2)	2003-09-01	Sunwoo et al.	Applicant
US6621137(B1)	2003-09-01	Ma et al.	Applicant
US6630753(B2)	2003-10-01	Malik et al.	Applicant
US6635509(B1)	2003-10-01	Ouellet	Applicant
US6639872(B1)	2003-10-01	Rein	Applicant
US6651488(B2)	2003-11-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US6657363(B1)	2003-12-01	Aigner	Applicant
US6668618(B2)	2003-12-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US6670866(B2)	2003-12-01	Ella et al.	Applicant
US6677929(B2)	2004-01-01	Gordon et al.	Applicant
US6693500(B2)	2004-02-01	Yang et al.	Applicant
US6710508(B2)	2004-03-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6710681(B2)	2004-03-01	Figueredo et al.	Applicant
US6713314(B2)	2004-03-01	Wong et al.	Applicant
US6714102(B2)	2004-03-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US6720844(B1)	2004-04-01	Lakin	Applicant
US6720846(B2)	2004-04-01	Iwashita et al.	Applicant
US6724266(B2)	2004-04-01	Plazza et al.	Applicant
US6738267(B1)	2004-05-01	Navas Sabater et al.	Applicant
US6750593(B2)	2004-06-01	Iwata	Applicant
US6774746(B2)	2004-08-01	Whatmore et al.	Applicant
US6777263(B1)	2004-08-01	Gan et al.	Applicant
US6787048(B2)	2004-09-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US6788170(B1)	2004-09-01	Kaitila et al.	Applicant
US6803835(B2)	2004-10-01	Frank	Applicant
US6812619(B1)	2004-11-01	Kaitila et al.	Applicant
US6820469(B1)	2004-11-01	Adkins et al.	Applicant
US6828713(B2)	2004-12-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US6842088(B2)	2005-01-01	Yamada et al.	Applicant
US6842089(B2)	2005-01-01	Lee	Applicant
US6849475(B2)	2005-02-01	Kim	Examiner
US6853534(B2)	2005-02-01	Williams	Applicant
US6861920(B2)	2005-03-01	Ishikawa et al.	Applicant
US6872931(B2)	2005-03-01	Liess et al.	Applicant
US6873065(B2)	2005-03-01	Haigh et al.	Applicant
US6873529(B2)	2005-03-01	Ikuta	Applicant
US6874211(B2)	2005-04-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US6874212(B2)	2005-04-01	Larson, III	Applicant
US6888424(B2)	2005-05-01	Takeuchi et al.	Applicant
US6900705(B2)	2005-05-01	Nakamura et al.	Applicant
US6903452(B2)	2005-06-01	Ma et al.	Applicant
US6906451(B2)	2005-06-01	Yamada et al.	Applicant
US6911708(B2)	2005-06-01	Park	Applicant
US6917261(B2)	2005-07-01	Unterberger	Applicant
US6924583(B2)	2005-08-01	Lin et al.	Applicant
US6924717(B2)	2005-08-01	Ginsburg et al.	Applicant
US6927651(B2)	2005-08-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US6936837(B2)	2005-08-01	Yamada et al.	Applicant
US6936928(B2)	2005-08-01	Hedler et al.	Applicant
US6936954(B2)	2005-08-01	Peczalski	Applicant
US6941036(B2)	2005-09-01	Lucero	Applicant
US6943647(B2)	2005-09-01	Aigner	Applicant
US6943648(B2)	2005-09-01	Maiz et al.	Applicant
US6946928(B2)	2005-09-01	Larson et al.	Applicant
US6954121(B2)	2005-10-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US6963257(B2)	2005-11-01	Ella et al.	Applicant
US6970365(B2)	2005-11-01	Turchi	Applicant
US6975183(B2)	2005-12-01	Aigner et al.	Applicant
US6977563(B2)	2005-12-01	Komuro et al.	Applicant
US6985051(B2)	2006-01-01	Nguyen et al.	Applicant
US6985052(B2)	2006-01-01	Tikka	Applicant
US6987433(B2)	2006-01-01	Larson et al.	Applicant
US6989723(B2)	2006-01-01	Komuro et al.	Applicant
US6998940(B2)	2006-02-01	Metzger	Applicant
US7002437(B2)	2006-02-01	Takeuchi et al.	Applicant
US7019604(B2)	2006-03-01	Gotoh et al.	Applicant
US7019605(B2)	2006-03-01	Larson, III	Applicant
US7026876(B1)	2006-04-01	Esfandiari et al.	Applicant
US7053456(B2)	2006-05-01	Matsuo	Applicant
US7057476(B2)	2006-06-01	Hwu	Applicant
US7057478(B2)	2006-06-01	Korden et al.	Applicant
US7064606(B2)	2006-06-01	Louis	Applicant
US7084553(B2)	2006-08-01	Ludwiczak	Applicant
US7091649(B2)	2006-08-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US7098758(B2)	2006-08-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US7102460(B2)	2006-09-01	Schmidhammer et al.	Applicant
US7109826(B2)	2006-09-01	Ginsburg et al.	Examiner
US7128941(B2)	2006-10-01	Lee	Applicant
US7129806(B2)	2006-10-01	Sato	Applicant
US7138889(B2)	2006-11-01	Lakin	Applicant
US7148466(B2)	2006-12-01	Eckman et al.	Applicant
US7158659(B2)	2007-01-01	Baharav et al.	Applicant
US7161448(B2)	2007-01-01	Feng et al.	Applicant
US7170215(B2)	2007-01-01	Namba et al.	Applicant
US7173504(B2)	2007-02-01	Larson	Applicant
US7187254(B2)	2007-03-01	Su et al.	Applicant
US7209374(B2)	2007-04-01	Noro	Applicant
US7212083(B2)	2007-05-01	Inoue et al.	Applicant
US7212085(B2)	2007-05-01	Wu	Applicant
US7230509(B2)	2007-06-01	Stoemmer	Applicant
US7230511(B2)	2007-06-01	Onishi et al.	Applicant
US7233218(B2)	2007-06-01	Park et al.	Applicant
US7242270(B2)	2007-07-01	Larson et al.	Applicant
US7259498(B2)	2007-08-01	Nakatsuka et al.	Applicant
US7268647(B2)	2007-09-01	Sano et al.	Examiner
US7275292(B2)	2007-10-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US7276994(B2)	2007-10-01	Takeuchi et al.	Applicant
US7280007(B2)	2007-10-01	Feng et al.	Applicant
US7281304(B2)	2007-10-01	Kim et al.	Applicant
US7294919(B2)	2007-11-01	Bai	Applicant
US7301258(B2)	2007-11-01	Tanaka	Applicant
US7310861(B2)	2007-12-01	Aigner et al.	Applicant
US7313255(B2)	2007-12-01	Machida et al.	Applicant
US7332985(B2)	2008-02-01	Larson et al.	Applicant
US7345410(B2)	2008-03-01	Grannen et al.	Applicant
US7358831(B2)	2008-04-01	Larson et al.	Applicant
US7367095(B2)	2008-05-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US7368857(B2)	2008-05-01	Tanaka	Applicant
US7369013(B2)	2008-05-01	Fazzio et al.	Applicant
US7385467(B2)	2008-06-01	Stoemmer et al.	Applicant
US7388318(B2)	2008-06-01	Yamada et al.	Applicant
US7388454(B2)	2008-06-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US7388455(B2)	2008-06-01	Larson, III	Applicant
US7391286(B2)	2008-06-01	Jamneala et al.	Applicant
US7400217(B2)	2008-07-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US7408428(B2)	2008-08-01	Larson, III	Applicant
US7414349(B2)	2008-08-01	Sasaki	Applicant
US7414495(B2)	2008-08-01	Iwasaki et al.	Applicant
US7420320(B2)	2008-09-01	Sano et al.	Applicant
US7423503(B2)	2008-09-01	Larson, III	Applicant
US7425787(B2)	2008-09-01	Larson, III	Applicant
US7439824(B2)	2008-10-01	Aigner	Applicant
US7463118(B2)	2008-12-01	Jacobsen	Applicant
US7466213(B2)	2008-12-01	Lobl et al.	Applicant
US7482737(B2)	2009-01-01	Yamada et al.	Examiner
US7508286(B2)	2009-03-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US7515018(B2)	2009-04-01	Handtmann et al.	Applicant
US7535324(B2)	2009-05-01	Fattinger et al.	Applicant
US7545532(B2)	2009-06-01	Muramoto	Applicant
US7561009(B2)	2009-07-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US7567023(B2)	2009-07-01	Iwaki et al.	Applicant
US7576471(B1)	2009-08-01	Solal	Applicant
US7602101(B2)	2009-10-01	Hara et al.	Examiner
US7619493(B2)	2009-11-01	Uno et al.	Applicant
US7629865(B2)	2009-12-01	Ruby	Applicant
US7655963(B2)	2010-02-01	Sadaka et al.	Applicant
US7684109(B2)	2010-03-01	Godshalk et al.	Applicant
US7714684(B2)	2010-05-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US7768364(B2)	2010-08-01	Hart et al.	Applicant
US7795781(B2)	2010-09-01	Barber et al.	Applicant
US7889024(B2)	2011-02-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US8008993(B2)	2011-08-01	Milsom et al.	Applicant
US8084919(B2)	2011-12-01	Nishihara et al.	Applicant
US2002/0000646(A1)	2002-01-01	Gooch et al.	Applicant
US2002/0030424(A1)	2002-03-01	Iwata	Applicant
US2002/0063497(A1)	2002-05-01	Panasik	Applicant
US2002/0070463(A1)	2002-06-01	Chang et al.	Applicant
US2002/0121944(A1)	2002-09-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2002/0121945(A1)	2002-09-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US2002/0126517(A1)	2002-09-01	Matsukawa et al.	Applicant
US2002/0140520(A1)	2002-10-01	Hikita et al.	Applicant
US2002/0152803(A1)	2002-10-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2002/0190814(A1)	2002-12-01	Yamada et al.	Applicant
US2003/0001251(A1)	2003-01-01	Cheever et al.	Applicant
US2003/0006502(A1)	2003-01-01	Karpman	Applicant
US2003/0011285(A1)	2003-01-01	Ossmann	Applicant
US2003/0011446(A1)	2003-01-01	Bradley	Applicant
US2003/0051550(A1)	2003-03-01	Nguyen et al.	Applicant
US2003/0087469(A1)	2003-05-01	Ma	Applicant
US2003/0102776(A1)	2003-06-01	Takeda et al.	Applicant
US2003/0111439(A1)	2003-06-01	Fetter et al.	Applicant
US2003/0128081(A1)	2003-07-01	Ella et al.	Applicant
US2003/0132493(A1)	2003-07-01	Kang et al.	Applicant
US2003/0132809(A1)	2003-07-01	Senthilkumar et al.	Applicant
US2003/0141946(A1)	2003-07-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US2003/0179053(A1)	2003-09-01	Aigner et al.	Applicant
US2003/0205948(A1)	2003-11-01	Lin et al.	Applicant
US2004/0016995(A1)	2004-01-01	Kuo et al.	Applicant
US2004/0017130(A1)	2004-01-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2004/0056735(A1)	2004-03-01	Nomura et al.	Applicant
US2004/0092234(A1)	2004-05-01	Pohjonen	Applicant
US2004/0099898(A1)	2004-05-01	Grivna et al.	Applicant
US2004/0124952(A1)	2004-07-01	Tikka	Applicant
US2004/0150293(A1)	2004-08-01	Unterberger	Applicant
US2004/0150296(A1)	2004-08-01	Park et al.	Applicant
US2004/0166603(A1)	2004-08-01	Carley et al.	Applicant
US2004/0195937(A1)	2004-10-01	Matsubara et al.	Applicant
US2004/0212458(A1)	2004-10-01	Lee	Applicant
US2004/0246075(A1)	2004-12-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US2004/0257171(A1)	2004-12-01	Park et al.	Applicant
US2004/0257172(A1)	2004-12-01	Schmidhammer et al.	Applicant
US2004/0263287(A1)	2004-12-01	Ginsburg et al.	Applicant
US2005/0012570(A1)	2005-01-01	Korden et al.	Applicant
US2005/0012716(A1)	2005-01-01	Mikulin et al.	Applicant
US2005/0023931(A1)	2005-02-01	Bouche et al.	Applicant
US2005/0030126(A1)	2005-02-01	Inoue et al.	Applicant
US2005/0036604(A1)	2005-02-01	Scott et al.	Applicant
US2005/0057117(A1)	2005-03-01	Nakatsuka et al.	Applicant
US2005/0057324(A1)	2005-03-01	Onishi et al.	Applicant
US2005/0068124(A1)	2005-03-01	Stoemmer	Applicant
US2005/0093396(A1)	2005-05-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2005/0093653(A1)	2005-05-01	Larson, III	Applicant
US2005/0093654(A1)	2005-05-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2005/0093655(A1)	2005-05-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2005/0093657(A1)	2005-05-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2005/0093658(A1)	2005-05-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2005/0093659(A1)	2005-05-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2005/0104690(A1)	2005-05-01	Larson et al.	Applicant
US2005/0110598(A1)	2005-05-01	Larson, III	Applicant
US2005/0128030(A1)	2005-06-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2005/0140466(A1)	2005-06-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2005/0167795(A1)	2005-08-01	Higashi	Applicant
US2005/0193507(A1)	2005-09-01	Ludwiczak	Applicant
US2005/0206271(A1)	2005-09-01	Higuchi et al.	Applicant
US2005/0206479(A1)	2005-09-01	Nguyen et al.	Applicant
US2005/0206483(A1)	2005-09-01	Pashby et al.	Applicant
US2005/0218488(A1)	2005-10-01	Matsuo	Applicant
US2005/0248232(A1)	2005-11-01	Itaya et al.	Examiner
US2005/0269904(A1)	2005-12-01	Oka	Examiner
US2006/0017352(A1)	2006-01-01	Tanielian	Applicant
US2006/0071736(A1)	2006-04-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US2006/0081048(A1)	2006-04-01	Mikado et al.	Applicant
US2006/0087199(A1)	2006-04-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2006/0103492(A1)	2006-05-01	Feng et al.	Applicant
US2006/0119453(A1)	2006-06-01	Fattinger et al.	Applicant
US2006/0125489(A1)	2006-06-01	Feucht et al.	Applicant
US2006/0132262(A1)	2006-06-01	Fazzio et al.	Applicant
US2006/0164183(A1)	2006-07-01	Tikka et al.	Applicant
US2006/0164186(A1)	2006-07-01	Stoemer et al.	Applicant
US2006/0185139(A1)	2006-08-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2006/0197411(A1)	2006-09-01	Hoen et al.	Applicant
US2006/0238070(A1)	2006-10-01	Costa et al.	Applicant
US2006/0284707(A1)	2006-12-01	Larson et al.	Applicant
US2006/0290446(A1)	2006-12-01	Aigner et al.	Applicant
US2007/0035364(A1)	2007-02-01	Sridhar et al.	Applicant
US2007/0037311(A1)	2007-02-01	Izumi et al.	Applicant
US2007/0080759(A1)	2007-04-01	Jamneala et al.	Applicant
US2007/0085447(A1)	2007-04-01	Larson, III	Applicant
US2007/0085631(A1)	2007-04-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2007/0085632(A1)	2007-04-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2007/0086080(A1)	2007-04-01	Larson, III et al.	Applicant
US2007/0086274(A1)	2007-04-01	Nishimura et al.	Applicant
US2007/0090892(A1)	2007-04-01	Larson, III	Applicant
US2007/0170815(A1)	2007-07-01	Unkrich	Applicant
US2007/0171002(A1)	2007-07-01	Unkrich	Applicant
US2007/0176710(A1)	2007-08-01	Jamneala et al.	Applicant
US2007/0205850(A1)	2007-09-01	Jamneala et al.	Applicant
US2007/0279153(A1)	2007-12-01	Ruby	Applicant
US2007/0291164(A1)	2007-12-01	Goh et al.	Applicant
US2008/0055020(A1)	2008-03-01	Handtmann	Applicant
US2008/0129417(A1)	2008-06-01	Taniguchi	Applicant
US2008/0143215(A1)	2008-06-01	Hara et al.	Examiner
US2008/0258842(A1)	2008-10-01	Ruby et al.	Applicant
US2008/0297278(A1)	2008-12-01	Handtmann et al.	Applicant
US2008/0297279(A1)	2008-12-01	Thalhammer et al.	Applicant
US2008/0297280(A1)	2008-12-01	Thalhammer et al.	Applicant
US2009/0064498(A1)	2009-03-01	Mok et al.	Applicant
US2009/0079302(A1)	2009-03-01	Wall et al.	Examiner
US2009/0096550(A1)	2009-04-01	Handtmann et al.	Applicant
US2009/0127978(A1)	2009-05-01	Asai et al.	Applicant
US2009/0153268(A1)	2009-06-01	Milson et al.	Applicant
US2009/0201594(A1)	2009-08-01	Smith	Applicant
US2010/0052176(A1)	2010-03-01	Kamada et al.	Applicant
US2010/0052815(A1)	2010-03-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US2010/0091370(A1)	2010-04-01	Mahrt et al.	Applicant
US2010/0102358(A1)	2010-04-01	Lanzieri et al.	Applicant
US2010/0148637(A1)	2010-06-01	Satou	Applicant
US2010/0176899(A1)	2010-07-01	Schaufele et al.	Applicant
US2010/0187948(A1)	2010-07-01	Sinha et al.	Applicant
US2010/0260453(A1)	2010-10-01	Block	Applicant
US2010/0327697(A1)	2010-12-01	Choy et al.	Applicant
US2010/0327994(A1)	2010-12-01	Choy et al.	Applicant
US2011/0084779(A1)	2011-04-01	Zhang	Applicant
DE10160617	2003-06-01		Applicant
DE10239317	2004-03-01		Applicant
DE102007012384	2007-03-01		Applicant
EP231892	1987-08-01		Applicant
EP637875	1995-02-01		Applicant
EP637875	1995-02-01		Applicant
EP689254	1995-12-01		Applicant
EP865157	1998-09-01		Applicant
EP880227	1998-11-01		Applicant
EP973256	2000-01-01		Applicant
EP973256	2000-01-01		Applicant
EP1047189	2000-10-01		Applicant
EP1096259	2001-05-01		Applicant
EP1100196	2001-05-01		Applicant
EP1180494	2002-02-01		Applicant
EP1249932	2002-10-01		Applicant
EP1258989	2002-11-01		Applicant
EP1258990	2002-11-01		Applicant
EP1517443	2005-03-01		Applicant
EP1517444	2005-03-01		Applicant
EP1528674	2005-05-01		Applicant
EP1528675	2005-05-01		Applicant
EP1528676	2005-05-01		Applicant
EP1528677	2005-05-01		Applicant
EP1542362	2005-06-01		Applicant
EP1557945	2005-07-01		Applicant
EP1575165	2005-09-01		Applicant
EP2299592	2009-12-01		Applicant
EP2299593	2011-03-01		Applicant
FR2951027	2009-10-01		Applicant
GB1207974	1970-10-01		Applicant
GB2013343	1979-08-01		Applicant
GB2411239	2005-08-01		Applicant
GB2418791	2006-04-01		Applicant
GB2427773	2007-01-01		Applicant
JP59023612	1984-02-01		Applicant
JP61054686	1986-03-01		Applicant
JP62-109419	1987-05-01		Applicant
JP62-200813	1987-09-01		Applicant
JP1-295512	1989-11-01		Applicant
JP2-10907	1990-01-01		Applicant
JP6005944	1994-01-01		Applicant
JP8-330878	1996-12-01		Applicant
JP9-027729	1997-01-01		Applicant
JP9-83029	1997-03-01		Applicant
JP10-32456	1998-02-01		Applicant
JP2000-31552	2000-01-01		Applicant
JP2000-232334	2000-08-01		Applicant
JP2000-295065	2000-10-01		Applicant
JP2001-102901	2001-04-01		Applicant
JP2001-508630	2001-06-01		Applicant
JP2002/217676	2002-08-01		Applicant
JP2002217676	2002-08-01		Applicant
JP2003/017964	2003-01-01		Applicant
JP2003017964	2003-01-01		Applicant
JP2003-505905	2003-02-01		Applicant
JP2003/124779	2003-04-01		Applicant
JP2003124779	2003-04-01		Applicant
JP2003-332872	2003-11-01		Applicant
JP2006-109472	2006-04-01		Applicant
JP2006-295924	2006-10-01		Applicant
JP2006-319796	2006-11-01		Applicant
JP2007-006501	2007-01-01		Applicant
JP2007/028669	2007-02-01		Applicant
JP2007-295306	2007-11-01		Examiner
JP2008-066792	2008-03-01		Examiner
WO-98/16957	1998-04-01		Applicant
WO-98/38736	1998-09-01		Applicant
WO-98/56049	1998-12-01		Applicant
WO-99/37023	1999-07-01		Applicant
WO-99-37023	1999-07-01		Applicant
WO-01/06646	2001-01-01		Applicant
WO-01/06647	2001-01-01		Applicant
WO-01/99276	2001-12-01		Applicant
WO-02/103900	2002-12-01		Applicant
WO-03/030358	2003-04-01		Applicant
WO-03/043188	2003-05-01		Applicant
WO-03/050950	2003-06-01		Applicant
WO-03/058809	2003-07-01		Applicant
WO-2004/034579	2004-04-01		Applicant
WO-2004/051744	2004-06-01		Applicant
WO-2004/102688	2004-11-01		Applicant
WO-2005/043752	2005-05-01		Applicant
WO-2005/043753	2005-05-01		Applicant
WO-2005/043756	2005-05-01		Applicant
WO-2006/018788	2006-02-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (71)

Machine Translation of JP 2007-295306 published Nov. 8, 2007.Examiner
Al-Ahmad, M. et al., “Piezoelectric-Based Tunable Microstrip Shunt Resonator”, Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference 2006.Applicant
U.S. Appl. No. 10/971,169, filed Oct. 22, 2004, Larson III, John D., et al.Applicant
Aoyama, Takayuki et al., “Diffusion of Boron, Phosphorous, Arsenic and Antimony in Thermally Grown SiliconDioxide”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 146, No. 5 1999 , 1879-1883.Applicant
Auld, B. A. , “Acoustic Resonators”, Acoustic Fields and Waves in Solids, Second Edition, vol. II 1990 , 250-259.Applicant
Bauer, L. O. et al., “Properties of Silicon Implanted with Boron Ions through Thermal Silicon Dioxide”, Solid State Electronics, vol. 16, No. 3 Mar. 1973 , 289-300.Applicant
Choi, Sungjin et al., “Design of Half-Bridge Piezo-Transformer Converters in the AC Adapter Applications”, IEEE 2005, 244-248.Applicant
Coombs, Clyde F. , “Electronic Instrument Handbook”, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1995 , pp. 5.1 to 5.29.Applicant
Fattinger, G. G. et al., “Coupled Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator Filters: Key technology for single-to-balanced RF filters”, 0/7803-8331-1/4/W20.00: IEEE MTT-S Digest 2004 , 927-929.Applicant
Hadimioglu, B. et al., ““Polymer Films As Acoustic Matching Layers”.”, 1990 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, vol. 3 PP. [Previously submitted as “Polymer Files As Acoustic Matching Layers, 1990 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceeding. vol. 4 PP. 1227-1340, Dec. 1990”. Considered by Examiner on Mar. 20, 2007, 337-1340.Applicant
Hara, K. , “Surface Treatment of Quartz Oscillator Plate by Ion Implantation”, Oyo Buturi, vol. 47, No. 2 Feb. 1978 , 145-146.Applicant
Holzlohner, Ronald et al., “Accurate Calculation of Eye Diagrams and Bit Error Rates in Optical Transmission Systems Using Linearization”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 20, No. 3, Mar. 2002, pp. 389-400.Applicant
Ivensky, Gregory et al., “A Comparison of Piezoelectric Transformer AC/DC Converters with Current Doubler and voltage Doubler Rectifiers”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 6. Nov. 2004.Applicant
Jiang, Yimin et al., “A Novel Single-Phase Power Factor Correction Scheme”, IEEE 1993 , 287-292.Applicant
Jung, Jun-Phil et al., “Experimental and Theoretical Investigation on the Relationship Between AIN Properties and AIN-Based FBAR Characteristics”, 2003 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and PDA Exhibition Jointly with the 17th European Frequency and Time Forum Sep. 3, 2003 , 779-784.Applicant
Krishnaswamy, S.V. et al., “Film Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator Technology”, May 29, 1990 , 529-536.Applicant
Lakin, K.M. , “Bulk Acoustic Wave Coupled Resonator Filters”, 2002 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and PDA Exhibition Jan. 2, 2002 , 8-14.Applicant
Lakin, K.M. , “Coupled Resonator Filters”, 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Mar. 2, 2002 , 901-908.Applicant
Lakin, K.M. et al., “High Performance Stacked Crystal Filters for GPS and Wide Bandwidth Applications”, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Jan. 1, 2001 , 833-838.Applicant
Lakin, K. M. et al., “Temperature Compensated Bulk Acoustic Thin Film Resonators”, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, San Juan, Puerto Rico Oct. 2000 , 855-858.Applicant
Lakin, K.M. , “Thin Film BAW Filters for Wide Bandwidth and High Performance Applications”, IEEE Microwave Symposium Digest; vol. 2 Jun. 6-11, 2004 , 923-926.Applicant
Lakin, K. M. , “Thin Film Resonators and Filters”, IEEE Untrasonics Symposium, Caesar's Tahoe, NV Oct. 1999 , 895-906.Applicant
Lakin, et al., “Wide Bandwidth Thin Film BAW Filters”, 2004 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, vol. 1, Aug. 2004 , 407-410.Applicant
Larson III, John D. et al., “Measurement of Effective Kt2,Q,Rp,Rs vs. Temperature for Mo/AIN FBAR Resonators”, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 2002 , 939-943.Applicant
Li, Yunxiu et al., “AC-DC Converter with Worldwide Range Input Voltage by Series and Parallel Piezoelectric Transformer Connection”, 35th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference 2004.Applicant
Lobl, H.P. et al., “Piezoelectric Materials for BAW Resonators and Filters”, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Jan. 1, 2001 , 807-811.Applicant
Martin, Steven J. et al., “Development of a Low Dielectric Constant Polymer for the Fabrication of Integrated Circuit Interconnect”, 12 Advanced Materials Dec. 23, 2000 , 1769-1778.Applicant
Navas, J. et al., “Miniaturised Battery Charger using Piezoelectric Transformers”, IEEE 2001 , 492-496.Applicant
Ng, J. et al., “The Diffusion Ion-Implanted Boron in Silicon Dioxide”, AIP Conf. Proceedings, No. 122 1984 , 20-33.Applicant
Ohta, S. et al., “Temperature Characteristics of Solidly Mounted Piezoelectric Thin Film Resonators”, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Honolulu, HI Oct. 2003 , 2011-2015.Applicant
Pang, W. et al., “High Q Single-Mode High-Tone Bulk Acoustic Resonator Integrated With Surface-Machined FBAR Filter”, Microwave Symposium Digest, IEEE MTT-S International 2005 , 413-416.Applicant
Parker, T. E. et al., “Temperature-Compensated Surface Acoustic-Wave Devices with SiO2 Film Overlays”, J. Appl. Physics, vol. 50 1360-1369 , Mar. 1979.Applicant
Reinhardt, Alexandre et al., “Design of Coupled Resonator Filters Using Admittance and Scattering Matrices”, 2003 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium May 3, 2003 , 1428-1431.Applicant
Ruby, R. C. , “MicroMachined Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Resonators”, IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium 1994 , 135-138.Applicant
Ruby, R. et al., “The Effect of Perimeter Geometry on FBAR Resonator Electrical Performance”, Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005 IEEE MTT-S International Jun. 12, 2005 , 217-221.Applicant
Sanchez, A.M. et al., “Mixed analytical and numerical design method for piezoelectric transformers”, IEEE,PESX Jun. 2003 , 841-846.Applicant
Schuessler, Hans H. , “Ceramic Filters and Resonators”, Reprinted from IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason., vol. SU-21 Oct. 1974 , 257-268.Applicant
Spangenberg, B. et al., “Dependence of the Layer Resistance of Boron Implantation in Silicon and the Annealing Conditions”, Comptus Rendus de l'Academic Bulgare des Sciences, vol. 33, No. 3 1980 , 325-327.Applicant
Tiersten, H. F. et al., “An Analysis of Thiskness-Extensional Trapped Energy Resonant Device Structures with Rectangular Electrodes in the Piezoelectric Thin Film on Silicon Configuration”, J. Appl. Phys. 54 (10) Oct. 1983 , 5893-5910.Applicant
Topich, J. A. et al., “Effects of Ion Implanted Flourine in Silicon Dioxide”, Nuclear Instr. and Methods, Cecon Rec, Cleveland, OH May 1978 , 70-73.Applicant
Tsubbouchi, K. et al., “Zero Temperature coefficient Surface Acoustic Wave Devices using Epitaxial AIN Films”, IEEE Ultrasonic symposium, San Diaego, CA, 1082 1982 , 240-245.Applicant
Vasic, D et al., “A New Method to Design Piezoelectic Transformer Used in MOSFET & IGBT Drive Circuits”, IEEE 34th Anuual Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2003 vol. 1 Jun. 15-19, 2003 , 307-312.Applicant
Vasic, D et al., “A New MOSFET & IGBT Gate Drive Insulated by a Piezoelectric Transformer”, IEEE 32 nd Annual Power Electronics Specilaists Conference, 2001 vol. 3 2001 , 1479-1484.Applicant
Yang, C.M. et al., “Highly C Axis Oriented AIN Film Using MOCVD for 5GHx Band FBAR Filter”, 2003 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Oct. 5, 2003 , pp. 170-173.Applicant
Akiyama, et al., “Enhancement of Piezoelectric Response in Scandium Aluminum Nitride Alloy Thin Films Prepared by Dual Reactive Cosputtering”, Adv. Mater 2009 , 593-596.Applicant
Bi, F.Z. , “Bulk Acoustic Wave RF Technology”, IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 9, Issue 5. 65-80, Oct. 2008.Applicant
Chen, , “Fabrication and Characterization of ALN Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator”, Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh School of Engineering 2006.Applicant
C-S Lee, et al., “Copper-Airbridged Low-Noise GaAs PHEMT With Ti/WNX/Ti Diffusion Barrier for High-Frequency”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53 , Issue: 8. 2006 , 1753-1758.Applicant
Denisse, C.M.M. et al., “Plasma-Enhanced Growth and Composition of Silicon Oxynitride Films”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 60, No. 7. Oct. 1, 1986 , 2536-2542.Applicant
Fattinger, G.G. et al., “Single-To-Balance Filters for Mobile Phones Using Coupled Resonator BAW Technology”, 2004 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Aug. 2004 , 416-419.Applicant
Fattinger, G. B. et al., “Spurious Mode Suppression in Coupled Resonator Filters”, IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest 2005 , 409-412.Applicant
Gilbert, S. R. , “An Ultra-Miniature, Low Cost Single Ended to Differential Filter for ISM Band Applications”, Micro. Symp. Digest, 2008 IEEE MTT-S Jun. 2008 , 839-842.Applicant
Grill, A. et al., “Ultralow-K Dielectrics Prepared by Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition”, App. Phys. Lett, vol. 79 2001 , 803-805.Applicant
Jamneala, T. et al., “Coupled Resonator Filter with Single-Layer Acoustic Coupler”, IEEE Transaction on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 55 Oct. 2008 , 2320-2326.Applicant
Jamneala, Tiberiu et al., “Ultra-Miniature Coupled Resonator Filter with Single-Layer Scoustic Coupler”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 56, No. 11. Nov. 2009 , 2553-2558.Applicant
Kaitila, J. et al., “Measurement of Acoustical Parameters of Thin Films”, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Oct. 2006 , 464-467.Applicant
Lee, Jiunn-Homg et al., “Optimization of Frame-Like Film Bulk Acoustic Resonators for Suppression of Spurious Lateral Modes Using Finite Element Method”, IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, vol. 1, 2004 , 278-281.Applicant
Loboda, M. J. , “New Solutions for Intermetal Dielectrics Using Trimethylsilane-Based PECVD Processes”, Microelectronics Eng., vol. 50. 2000 , 15-23.Applicant
Martin, et al., “Re-growth of C-Axis Oriented AIN Thin Films”, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 2006 , 169-172.Applicant
Martin, et al., “Shear Mode Coupling and Tilted Gram Growth of AIN Thin Films in BAW Resonators”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 53 No. 7 Jul. 2006 , 1339-1343.Applicant
Martinez, et al., “High confinement suspended micro-ring resonators in silicon-on-insulator”, Optics Express, Vo. 14, No. 13 Jun. 26, 2006 , 6259-6263.Applicant
Merriam-Webswter, , “Collegiate Dictionary”, tenth edition 2000 , 2 pages.Applicant
Pandey, et al., “Anchor Loss Reduction in Resonant MEMS using MESA Structures”, Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems, Bangkok, Thailand Jan. 16-19, 2007 , 880-885.Applicant
Pensala, et al., “Spurious resonance suppression in gigahertz-range ZnO thin-film bulk acoustic wave resonators by the boundary frame method: modeling and experiment”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 56, No. 8 Aug. 2009 , 1731-1744.Applicant
Pensala, , “Thin film bulk acoustic wave devices: performance optimization and modeling”, http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2011/P756.pdf, presented Feb. 2011.Applicant
Schoenholz, J.E. et al., “Plasma-Enhanced Deposition of Silicon Oxynitride Films”, Thin Solid Films 1987 , 285-291.Applicant
Shirakawa, A. A. et al., “Bulk Acoustic Wave Coupled Resonator Filters Synthesis Methodology”, 2005 European Microwave Conference, vol. 1 Oct. 2005.Applicant
Small, M. K. et al., “A De-Coupled Stacked Bulk Acoustic Resonator (DSBAR) Filter with 2 dB Bandwidth >4%”, 2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Oct. 2007 , 604-607.Applicant
Tas, et al., “Reducing Anchor Loss in Micromechanical Extensional Mode Resonators”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, vol. 57, No. 2. Feb. 2010 , 448-454.Applicant
Thomsen, C. et al., “Surface Generation and Detection of Phonons by Picosecond Light Pulses”, Phys. Rev. B, vol. 34, Sep. 1986, pp. 4129-4138.Applicant
Yanagitani, et al., “Giant Shear Mode Electromechanical Coupling Coefficient k15 in C-Axis Tilted ScAIN Films”, IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium 2010.Applicant

Abstract