US 8,244,359 B2Grant
System and method to modulate phrenic nerve to prevent sleep apnea
Issue Date:2012-08-14
•31 Claims
•9 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
An implantable medical device for treating breathing disorders such as central sleep apnea wherein stimulation is provided to the phrenic never through a transvenous lead system with the stimulation beginning after inspiration to extend the duration of a breath and to hold the diaphragm in a contracted condition.
Metadata
Assignee
- Respicardia, Inc.
Inventors
- Mark Gelfand
- Howard R. Levin
- Andrew Halpert
Application Information
Application Number:US 11/601,150
Filing Date:2006-11-17
Priority Date:2005-11-18
Art Unit:3766
Classifications
IPC:
A61N1/36
Patent Drawings (9 sheets)
Description
Cross-Reference to Related Cases
[0001] This case claims priority from and the benefit thereof and incorporates entirely: U.S. Provisional Application 60/737,808, filed Nov. 18, 2005, and entitled “System and Method to Modulate Phrenic Nerve to Prevent Sleep Apnea;” U.S. Provisional Application 60/743,062, filed Dec. 21, 2005, and entitled “System and Method to Modulate Phrenic Nerve to Prevent Sleep Apnea;” and U.S. Provisional Application 60/743,326, filed Feb. 21, 2006, and entitled “System and Method to Modulate Phrenic Nerve to Prevent Sleep Apnea.”
Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates generally to implantable medical devices and more particularly to a device and method for controlling breathing and for treating Central Sleep Apnea.
Background of the Invention
[0003] History
[0004] Sleep Disordered Breathing (SDB) and particularly Central Sleep Apnea (CSA) is a breathing disorder closely associated with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). The heart function of patients with heart failure may be treated with various drugs, or implanted cardiac pacemaker devices. The breathing function of patients with heart failure may be treated with Continuous Positive Air Pressure (CPAP) devices or Nocturnal Nasal Oxygen. These respiratory therapies are especially useful during periods of rest or sleep. Recently, implanted devices to directly address respiration disturbances have been proposed. Some proposed therapeutic devices combine cardiac pacing therapies with phrenic nerve stimulation to control breathing.
[0005] Phrenic nerve pacing as a separate and stand alone therapy has been explored for paralyzed patients where it is an alternative to forced mechanical ventilation, and for patients with the most severe cases of central sleep apnea. For example, Ondine's Curse has been treated with phrenic nerve pacemakers since at least the 1970's. In either instance, typically, such phrenic nerve pacemakers place an electrode in contact with the phrenic nerve and they pace the patient's phrenic nerve at a constant rate. Such therapy does not permit natural breathing and it occurs without regard to neural respiratory drive.
[0006] Motivation for Therapy
[0007] SDB exists in two primary forms. The first is central sleep apnea (CSA) and the second is obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). In OSA the patient's neural breathing drive remains intact, but the pulmonary airways collapse during inspiration, which prevents air flow causing a form of apnea. Typically, such patients awake or are aroused as a result of the apnea event. The forced airflow of CPAP helps keep the airways open providing a useful therapy to the OSA patient.
[0008] CSA patients also exhibit apnea but from a different cause. These CSA patients have episodes of reduced neural breathing drive for several seconds before breathing drive returns. The loss of respiratory drive and apnea is due to a dysfunction in the patient's central respiratory control located in the brain. This dysfunction causes the patient's breathing pattern to oscillate between too rapid breathing called hyperventilation and periods of apnea (not breathing). Repeated bouts of rapid breathing followed by apnea are seen clinically and this form of disordered breathing is called Cheyne-Stokes breathing or CSR. Other patterns have been seen clinically as well including bouts of hyperventilation followed by hypopneas only.
[0009] In patients with CHF, prognosis is significantly worse when sleep apnea is present. A high apnea-hypopnea index (a measure of the number of breathing disturbances per hour) has been found to correlate to a poor prognosis for the patient. The swings between hyperventilation and apnea characterized by central sleep apnea have three main adverse consequences, namely: large swings in arterial blood gases (oxygen and carbon dioxide); arousals and shifts to light sleep; and large negative swings in intrathoracic pressure during hyperventilation. The large swings in blood gases lead to decreased oxygen flow to the heart, activation of the sympathetic nervous system, endothelial cell dysfunction, and pulmonary arteriolar vasoconstriction. Arousals contribute to increased sympathetic nervous activity, which has been shown to predict poor survival of patients with heart failure. Negative intrathoracic pressure, which occurs during the hyperventilation phase of central apnea, increases the after load and oxygen consumption of the left ventricle of the heart. It also causes more fluid to be retained in the patient's lungs. As a result of these effects the patient's condition deteriorates.
[0010] In spite of advances in care and in knowledge there is a large unmet clinical need for patients with sleep disordered breathing especially those exhibiting central sleep apnea and congestive heart failure.
Summary of the Invention
[0011] The device of the present invention can sense the patients breathing and it can distinguish inhalation or inspiration from exhalation or expiration.
[0012] The device can periodically stimulate the phrenic nerve as required. In some embodiments the stimulation may be invoked automatically in response to sensed physiologic conditions. In some embodiments the device can stop the delivery of therapy in response to sensed conditions. In some embodiments the device can be prescribed and dispensed and the therapy delivered without regard to the sensed conditions. As a result, the device may be used to detect and intervene in order to correct episodes of sleep disordered breathing or the device may intervene to prevent episodes of sleep disordered breathing from occurring. The methods that are taught here may be used alone to treat a patient or they may be incorporated into a cardiac stimulating device where the respiration therapy is merged with a cardiac therapy. The therapy and its integration with cardiac stimulation therapy and the architecture for carrying out the therapy are quite flexible and may be implemented in any of several forms.
[0013] Hardware implementation and partitioning for carrying out the methods of the invention are also flexible. For example the phrenic nerve stimulation may be carried out with a transvenous lead system lodged in one of the cardiophrenic vein a short distance from the heart. One or both phrenic nerves may be accessed with leads. Either one side or both (right and left) phrenic nerves may be stimulated. Alternatively the phrenic nerve may be accessed through a large vein such as the jugular or the superior vena cava.
[0014] Because of the variety of anatomy and branching of the smaller veins, all non-central veins proximate to the phrenic nerve, including the pericardiophrenic, are call “phrenic nerve”. For example, the left or right pericadiophrenic veins are suitable for left or right phrenic nerve stimulation because of their proximity to the phrenic nerves, relatively simple catheter access, relative distance and separation from the excitable heart tissue by non-excitable tissue such as the pericardial membrane. Preferred placement of a stimulation electrode can be characterized by: not triggering heartbeat when stimulation current is applied, trigging breath, minimum phrenic nerve stimulation current, and lack of stimulation of different muscle groups not involved in respiration. As an alternative, a stimulation electrode may be placed in the pericardial space on the heart, near the phrenic nerve but electrically isolated from the heart.
[0015] The lead and stimulation electrodes may also take any of several forms. Leads may contain anchoring devices to prevent slippage. Multiple stimulation electrodes may be placed along the length of a lead. Any pair of these electrodes may be used for bipolar stimulation. The stimulator may switch between different electrodes to achieve capture of the phrenic nerve at a minimum energy level without stimulating the heart. Any electrode may be used as a sensory electrode, even those engaged in intermittent stimulation. Monopolar stimulation may also be used. When the electrode is monopolar, the reference electrode is likely the stimulator case. Leads may be coated with medications such as, but not limited to, steroids.
[0016] Implementation of respiration detection and measurement may also take any of several forms. Transthoracic impedance measurement may be taken from electrodes implanted at locations in the body to measure or sense the change in lung volume associated with breathing. Alternatively one or more implanted pressure transducers in or near the pleural cavity may be used to track pressure changes associated with breathing. Alternatively, respiration sensing may be carried out by an airflow sensor, a respiratory belt, a temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, and/or a CO2 sensor. In conjunction, or in alternative, sensing electrodes may be used to sense events such as cardiac electrical activity, patient activity, patient metabolic state. Knowledge of breathing rates and patterns are useful in carrying out the invention but distinguishing reliably the inspiration phase from expiration phase is a breath is particularly important for timing the delivery of the stimulation.
[0017] Any detection system used to trigger stimulation has a disadvantage of being susceptible to non-respiratory signals such as an artifact of motion, sudden arousal, or cough. The recognition of possible artifacts and comparison to stored breath history of normal breath patterns may be advantageous. If a given breathing pattern significantly differs from the template, then the breath may be rejected and stimulation deferred. Artifacts may be recognized and rejected by identification of: an unacceptably fast inhalation slope, an unacceptably high amplitude of tidal volume and/or the presence of a high frequency component in the respiratory signal spectrum. In all cases the stimulator logic may reject this “breath” and not apply a stimulation burst. It may also be useful to reject signals for some duration immediately following a stimulation pulse. This so-called “refractory period” may be measured as the duration of stimulation plus minimum time of expiration. In addition, an implantable stimulator may be equipped with an accelerometer. Acceleration signals may be used to reject a breath or several breaths and delay stimulation. After a normal pattern of breathing is restored, stimulation is resumed.
[0018] We consider that breathing has an inspiration phase followed by an expiration phase. Each breath is followed by a pause when the lungs are “still” before the next breath's inspiration. The device delivers phrenic nerve stimulation after the start of inspiration preferably toward the start of exhalation. The duration and magnitude of the stimulation is selected to “extend” the expiration phase or the respiratory pause of a naturally initiated breath. We note relatively little change in lung volume and little air exchange during the stimulation phase of the therapy. We have observed that prolongation of a natural breath, while keeping some air trapped in the lungs, delays the inspiration phase of next natural breath until the air trapped in the lungs is exhaled. For this reason our therapy has a tendency to lower the observed breathing rate. Typically the stimulation maintains activation of the diaphragm long enough to mimic a patient holding their breath by not letting the diaphragm relax. This mechanism of action controls the rate of breathing by increasing the effective duration of each breath.
[0019] Our experimental animal work has demonstrated the ability of the stimulation regime to down-regulate breathing rate (and minute ventilation) to a desired (preset) value while maintaining natural inspiration (i.e. by prolonging exhalation and extending the respiratory pause phases of the breath) without blocking the phrenic nerve. We believe that maintenance of natural inspiration is important since it allows prevention of airway collapse and retains certain capacity of the body to auto regulate rate of inspiration and depth of breathing. We also demonstrated that unilateral and transvenous stimulation is sufficient to carry out the invention and insures adequate levels of patient safety. In the process of prolonging the respiratory pause we “stilled” the lungs (no air movement occurred) while keeping one lung inflated. We believe that the mechanism of action for this observed effect is a physiologic feedback that prevents the respiration control center of the central nervous system from initiating the following breath. In other words we have invented a novel and practical therapy by substantially immobilizing at least one lung of the patient by maintaining the diaphragm in the contracted state by transvenous electrical stimulation of a phrenic nerve for the duration sufficient to substantially reduce breathing rate and alter the blood gas Composition of the patient.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0020] A preferred embodiment and best mode of the invention is illustrated in the attached drawings where identical reference numerals indicate identical structure throughout the figures and where multiple instances of a reference numeral in a figure show the identical structure at another location to improve the clarity of the figures, and where:
[0021] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram;
[0022] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram;
[0023] FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram;
[0024] FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram;
[0025] FIG. 5 is diagram showing experimentally derived physiologic data displayed in two panels A and B;
[0026] FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing physiologic data known in the prior art;
[0027] FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing physiologic data and device timing information; and
[0028] FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram showing physiologic data and device timing information.
[0029] FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram showing physiologic data and signal artifact rejection.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0030] FIG. 1 is schematic diagram showing an implanted medical device (IMD) 101 implanted in a patient's chest for carrying out a therapeutic stimulation of respiration. The patient has lungs shown in bold outline and indicated at 102 overlying the heart 103. The right phrenic nerve 104 passes from the head alongside the heart to innervate the diaphragm 106 at location 105.
[0031] In this embodiment a transvenous lead 107 passes from the IMD 101 and passes through venous vasculature to enter the cardiophrenic vein 108 on the right side of the patient. The cardiophrenic vein 108 lies next to the phrenic nerve 104 along the heart. Electrical stimulation pulses supplied to the stimulation electrode 110 on lead 107 interact with the phrenic nerve to stimulate it and thus activate the diaphragm 106. In the figure a series of concentric circles 112 indicate electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve. In this embodiment the stimulation electrode 110 lies far enough away from the heart 103 to avoid stimulating the heart 103. In this embodiment only one branch of the phrenic nerve 104 is stimulated and the other side of nerve is under normal physiologic control.
[0032] A respiration electrode 114 on lead 107 cooperates with an indifferent electrode on the can of the IMD 101 to source and sink low amplitude electrical pulses that are used to track changes in lung volume over time. This well known impedance plethysmography technique is used to derive the inspiration and expiration events of an individual breath and may be used to track breathing rate. This impedance measurement process is indicated in the diagram by the dotted line 116 radiating from the electrode site of respiration electrode 114 to the IMD 101. Transvenous stimulation of the phrenic nerve from a single lead carrying an impedance measuring respiration electrode is a useful system since it permits minimally invasive implantation of the system. However other architectures, are permissible and desirable in some instances.
[0033] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing alternative electrode and lead placements for use in carrying out the stimulation regime of the invention. In some patients it may be easier or more suitable to access the phrenic nerve in the neck in the jugular vein at electrode location 200. In some instances it may be preferable to place electrodes in veins both near the right phrenic nerve as indicated by the deep location of a stimulation electrode 110 and in the left phrenic nerve at electrode location 202. Other potential locations for the stimulation electrodes are the large vessel (SVC) above the heart indicated by electrode 203. Unilateral stimulation is preferred but having multiple sites available may be used to reduce nerve fatigue. Non-venous placement is possible as well. For example, placement of a patch electrode in the pericardial space between the heart and within the pericardial sac is suitable as well, as indicated by electrode location 205. In this embodiment the insulating patch 206 isolates spaced electrodes 207 and electrode 208 from the heart. The lead 204 connects this bipolar pair of electrodes to the IMD 101.
[0034] Also seen in this figure is a pressure transducer 209 located in the pleural cavity and connected to the IMD 101 via a lead. The pressure transducer 209 tracks pressure changes associated with breathing and provides this data to the implanted device 101. The pressure transducer is an alternative to the impedance measurement system for detecting respiration. Such intraplueral pressure signal transducers are known in the respiration monitoring field.
[0035] FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of a system for carrying out the invention. The system has art implanted portion 300 and an external programmer portion 301.
[0036] The IMD 101 can provide stimulation pulses to the stimulation electrode 110. A companion indifferent electrode 306 may be used to sink or source the stimulation current generated in analog circuits 303. A portion of the exterior surface 302 of the IMD 101 may be used with respiration electrode 114 to form an impedance plethysmograph. In operation, logic 305 will command the issuance of a train of pulses to the respiration electrode 114 and measure the amplitude of the signal as a function of time in circuits 304. This well known process can measure the respiration of the patient and find the inspiration phase and the expiration phase of a breath. Respiration data collected over minutes and hours can be logged, transmitted, and/or used to direct the therapy.
[0037] When the therapy is invoked by being turned on by the programmer 301 or in response to high rate breathing above an intervention set point, the logic 305 commands the stimulation the phrenic nerve via the stimulation electrode 110 at a time after the beginning of the inspiration phase. Preferable the stimulation begins after the onset of exhalation. There is some flexibility in onset of stimulation. The shape of the stimulation pulses is under study and it may be beneficial to have the logic 305 command stimulation at higher amplitudes of energy levels as the stimulation progresses. It may also be desirable to have stimulation ramp up and ramp down during the therapy. It may prove desirable to stimulate episodically. The therapy may be best administered to every other breath or in a random pattern. The programmer may permit the patient to regulate the therapy as well. However in each case the stimulation of the diaphragm “stills” the diaphragm resulting in an amount of air trapped in at least one lung and extends the breath duration.
[0038] The duration of the stimulation is under the control of logic 305. It is expected that the therapy will be dispensed with a fixed duration of pulses corresponding to breathing rate. It should be clear that other strategies for setting the duration of stimulation are within the scope of the invention. For example the breathing rate data can be used to set the stimulation duration to reduce breathing rate to a fraction of the observed rate. The therapy may also be invoked in response to detected high rate breathing or turned on at a fixed time of day. In a device where activity sensors are available the device may deliver therapy at times of relative inactivity (resting or sleeping). Activity sensors may also help in the detection and rejection of artifacts. An accelerometer, such as those used in cardiac pacing, would be an exemplary activity sensor.
[0039] FIG. 4 shows a schematic diagram of an alternate partitioning of the system. In this implementation, the respiration sensing is carried out outside the patient with sensor 404, while the implanted portion 400 communicates in real time with an external controller 401 via coils 403 and 402. This respiration sensor 404 may be a conventional respiration belt or thermistor based system. Real time breathing data is parsed in the controller 401 and control signal sent to the IPG 101 to drive stimulation of the phrenic nerve via lead 107. This implementation simplifies IMD 101 portion for the system and may be useful for delivery of therapy to a resting or sleeping patient.
[0040] FIG. 5 is set forth as two panels. The data collected from an experimental animal (pig) is presented in the two panels and should be considered together. Panel 5B plots airflow into and out of the animal against time, while panel 5A plots volume against time. In the experiment the volume data was computed (integrated) from the airflow measurement. The two panels are two ways of looking at the same data collected at the same time. In each panel the dotted tracing 500 in 5B and 502 in panel 5A represent the normal or natural or not-stimulated and therefore underlying breathing pattern of the animal. In panel 5A the inspiration phase of tracing 502 is seen as segment 514. After tracing 502 peaks, the expiration phase begins as indicated by segment 516. The figure shows that along trace 502, the air that is inhaled is exhaled before 2 seconds has elapsed, as indicated by the dotted trace 502 returning to the zero volume level.
[0041] Trace 504 is associated with the unilateral delivery of stimulation 508 to a phrenic nerve. In the tracing the start of stimulation at time 518 is well after the start of inspiration and corresponds approximately to the reversal of airflow from inspiration to expiration as seen at time 518. Very shortly after the stimulation begins the animal inhales more air seen by the “bump” 520 in the tracing 504 in panel 5B. A small increment in the total volume corresponding to this bump is seen at the same time in panel 5A. Of particular interest is the relatively flat tracing 522 corresponding to no significant change in lung volume during stimulation. Once stimulation terminates the lungs expel air as seen at volume change 524 in panel 5A corresponding to outflow labeled 512 in panel 5B. Only after the exhalation outflow 512 was complete did the sedated experimental animal initiate the next breath (not shown). Thus duration of breath was extended in this case from approximately 2 seconds to approximately 6 seconds resulting in the breathing rate reduction from 30 to 10 breaths per minute. The data support the assertion that adequate phrenic stimulation initiated after inspiration and during expiration can “prolong” or “hold” the breath and thus regulate or regularize breathing which it the value of the invention.
[0042] FIG. 6 shows a bout 601 of rapid breathing 603 followed by or preceded by apnea 602 events. This waveform is a presentation of Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) well known in the prior art. The corresponding tracing of blood gas 607 indicates that the rapid breathing drives off blood carbon dioxide (CO2) as indicated the slope of line 606. CSR begins with the rise of CO2 as indicated by ramp line 605 which triggers the rapid breathing. The ventilation drives the CO2 too low resulting in a loss of respiratory drive and an apnea event 602. During the apnea the level of CO2 rises as indicated by the slope of line 604. Once a threshold is reached the cycle repeats.
[0043] FIG. 7 shows a schematic diagram showing the delivery of the inventive therapy in the context of a patient experiencing CSR respiration. The patient experiences several quick breaths 701 and then the device is turned on as indicated by the stimulation pulses 709. The device looks for a natural inspiration and waits until about the turn from inspiration to expiration, then the burst 709 of stimulation is delivered to a phrenic nerve. As explained in connection with FIG. 5 the stimulation delays breath 706. This next breath is also a candidate for the therapy and stimulation burst 710 is delivered to the phrenic nerve delaying breath 707. In a similar fashion the device intervenes in breaths 707 and 708. It is expected that the lower rate breathing resulting from repeated application of the therapy will keep the CO2 level in a “normal” range 715 and prevent CSR. The therapy could also be invoked in response to a detected bout of CSR but this is not necessary and it is believed that keeping a patient out of CSR is the better therapy.
[0044] It may be noted that the stimulation waveforms vary in FIG. 7 with stimulation 710 rising in amplitude while stimulation 711 decreases in amplitude. Note as well that stimulation 712 ramps up and then down during the therapy. It is expected that the best waveform may vary from patient to patient or may vary over time. Also seen in the figure is a refractory period typified by period 730 that may be implemented in the logic 302 to prevent the device from issuing the therapy too close in time to the last intervention. In general the refractory period effectively disables the deliver of therapy until the refractory period expires. This places an effective low rate on stimulated rate of breathing. The refractory may be fixed, programmable or adjusted based on sensed breathing rate.
[0045] FIG. 8 illustrates the concept of expiratory period stimulation to expand a native breath. Panel 800 shows the inspiratory period 801 of the native breath 805, the peak native inspiration 803 and the extended expiratory period 814. For comparison, trace 805 shows the expiration period of the same breath without stimulation. Panel 810 shows the native phrenic nerve excitation burst 811 that causes spontaneous inspiration 801. Without additional stimulation, inspiration would be over, and expiration will begin shortly after the duration of the native excitation burst. The phrenic nerve electrode stimulation burst 809 begins approximately at the time with the natural excitation 811 stops. This time point also approximately coincides with the peak native inspiration 803. The respiratory signal on panel 800 can be a transthoracic impedance signal. Point 802 marks the inspiratory turn. Preferably, stimulation may begin after a delay following the inspiratory turn point or after the peak inspiratory point.
[0046] FIG. 9 illustrates the rejection of an artifact caused by cough or motion during sleep. Respiratory signal 900 shows disturbed breath 902 caused by cough. This signal pattern can be recognized and rejected by identification of: an unacceptably fast inhalation slop, an unacceptably high amplitude, and/or the presence of a high frequency component in the respiratory signal spectrum. In all cases the stimulatory logic will reject this “breath” and not apply a stimulation burst 910. The next breath may also be rejected to allow the system to come to a stead state by extending the “blanking period” window to the duration of two normal breaths. After the normal pattern of breathing is restored 903, stimulation is resumed 911 and 912. In addition, implantable stimulator may be equipped with an accelerometer. Acceleration trace 920 shows high acceleration (vibrations) 921 corresponding to the patient's cough or motion. The acceleration signal may be used to reject a breath or several breaths and delay stimulation.
Claims
Certificate of Correction present
The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.
What is claimed is:
1. A medical device for use in patients comprising:
a transvenous stimulation lead, said lead having at least one stimulation electrode placed in a vein adjacent to at least one phrenic nerve of the patient;
an implanted medical device (IMD) implanted in the body of the patient, said IMD being electrically connected said stimulation electrode;
a respiration sensor implanted in the patient, said respiration sensor being in communication with said IMD; and
a control logic incorporated within said IMD, said control logic capable of reading said respiration sensor, analyzing said respiration signal and delivering stimulation pulses to maintain activation of at least a portion of a diaphragm to said stimulation electrode at a time proximate the transition from an inhalation phase to an exhalation phase of a respiration, retaining air in at least one lung and preventing exhalation of the retained air for a period of time, and then after the period of time has lapsed, allowing a delayed exhalation outflow of the retained air.
2. The medical device of claim 1 further characterized by said control logic being capable of analyzing breath and delivering stimulation signal at the end of natural inspiration for a duration that exceeds natural exhalation.
3. The medical device of claim 1 further comprising: at least one sensing electrode in electrical communication with said IMD, said sensing electrode being capable of sensing cardiac electrical activity and transthoracic impedance.
4. The medical device of claim 1 further comprising: an implanted motion sensor capable of sensing motion of the patient; and said control logic being capable of sensing and analyzing motion signals.
5. The medical device of claim 4 further characterized by said control logic delivering phrenic nerve stimulation based on said respiratory sensor and disabling phrenic nerve stimulation based on said motion sensor.
6. The medical device of claim 4 further characterized by said motion sensor being an accelerometer for use in cardiac pacing.
7. The medical device of claim 1 further characterized by said control logic being capable of rejecting respiratory signals that appear during a refractory period.
8. The medical device of claim 4 further characterized by said control logic being capable of rejecting respiratory signals indicative of cough, arousal and movement.
9. The medical device of claim 1 further characterized by said lead having a plurality of stimulation electrodes.
10. The medical device of claim 1 further characterized by said stimulation electrode being bipolar.
11. The medical device of claim 1 further characterized by said stimulation electrode being monopolar.
12. The medical device of claim 1 further characterized by said lead having at least one anchoring mechanism.
13. The medical device of claim 1 further characterized by said stimulation electrode being coated with medication.
14. The medical device of claim 1 further characterized by the shape of said stimulation pulses being selected from the group consisting of consistent amplitudes, progressively increasing amplitudes, progressively decreasing amplitudes, and a combination of progressively increasing amplitudes following by consistent amplitude followed by progressively decreasing amplitude.
15. A medical device for use in patients comprising:
a transvenous stimulation lead, said lead having at least one stimulation electrode placed in a vein adjacent to at least one phrenic nerve of the patient;
an implanted medical device (IMD) implanted in the body of the patient, said IMD being electrically connected said stimulation electrode;
a respiration sensor external to the patient's body, said respiration sensor being in communication with said IMD; and
a control logic incorporated within said IMD, said control logic capable of reading said respiration sensor, analyzing said respiration signal and delivering stimulation pulses to maintain activation of at least a portion of a diaphragm to said stimulation electrode at a time proximate the transition from an inhalation phase to an exhalation phase of a respiration, retaining air in at least one lung and preventing exhalation of the retained air for a period of time, and then after the period of time has lapsed, allowing a delayed exhalation outflow of the retained air.
16. The medical device of claim 15 further characterized by said respiration sensor being selected from the group consisting of an airflow sensor, a respiratory belt, a temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, a CO2 sensor, and a transthoracic impedance electrodes.
17. A medical device for use in patients comprising:
a transvenous stimulation lead, said lead having at least one stimulation electrode configured to be placed in a vein adjacent to at least one phrenic nerve of a patient;
an implantable medical device (IMD) configured to be implanted in the body of the patient, said IMD capable of being electrically connected to said stimulation electrode; and
a control logic incorporated within said IMD, said control logic capable of delivering stimulation pulses to said stimulation electrode configured to stimulate the phrenic nerve resulting in contraction of at least part of a diaphragm, the contraction trapping air in at least one lung and preventing exhalation of the trapped air for a period of time while maintaining the capacity of the patient's body to regulate respiration, and then after the period of time has lapsed, allowing a delayed exhalation outflow of the trapped air.
18. The medical device of claim 17, further comprising a respiration sensor implanted in the patient, said respiration sensor communicating data to said IMD.
19. The medical device of claim 18, wherein the control logic calculates an observed breathing rate based on data from the respiration sensor and delivers stimulation pulses at a fixed stimulation rate that is less than the observed breathing rate.
20. A medical device for use in patients comprising:
a stimulation lead, said lead having at least one stimulation electrode configured to be placed proximate one of two phrenic nerves of a patient;
an implantable medical device (IMD) configured to be implanted in the body of the patient, said IMD capable of being electrically connected to said stimulation electrode; and
a control logic incorporated within said IMD, said control logic capable of delivering stimulation pulses to the stimulation electrode to stimulate the single phrenic nerve resulting in contraction of at least part of a diaphragm, the contraction trapping air in at least one lung and preventing exhalation of the trapped air for a period of time while maintaining the capacity of the patient's body to regulate respiration, and then after the period of time has lapsed, allowing a delayed exhalation outflow of the trapped air.
21. The medical device of claim 20, wherein the stimulation lead is configured to be placed in a vein proximate the phrenic nerve.
22. The medical device of claim 20, further comprising: an implanted motion and position sensor capable of sensing motion or position of the patient; and said control logic being capable of sensing and analyzing sensor signals.
23. The medical device of claim 22, wherein the control logic adjusts the stimulation intensity based on motion or position of the patient.
24. The medical device of claim 20, further comprising a respiration sensor implanted in the patient, said respiration sensor communicating data to said IMD.
25. The medical device of claim 24, wherein the control logic calculates an observed breathing rate based on data from the respiration sensor and delivers stimulation pulses at a fixed stimulation rate that is less than the observed breathing rate.
26. The medical device of claim 20, wherein the stimulation lead is configured to be retained in a pericardiophrenic vein.
27. The medical device of claim 20, wherein the stimulation lead is configured to be retained in a brachiocephalic vein.
28. The medical device of claim 20, wherein the stimulation lead is configured to be retained in a superior vena cava.
29. The medical device of claim 20, wherein the stimulation lead is configured to be retained in an internal jugular vein.
30. The medical device of claim 1, further characterized by said control logic being capable of analyzing breath and delivering stimulation signal stimulating the phrenic nerve via the stimulation electrode after the beginning of the inspiration phase, said stimulation magnitude being sufficient to still the diaphragm resulting in a substantial amount of air trapped in at least one lung.
31. An implantable device for treating a breathing disorder in a patient having a lung, a diaphragm innervated by a phrenic nerve and a vein near the phrenic nerve, the device comprising:
a lead having a stimulation electrode adapted for implantation in a vein of the patient proximate the phrenic nerve;
a respiration measuring device for monitoring the respiration of the patient, to find the inspiration phase of a breath; and
a stimulator for stimulating the phrenic nerve with the stimulation electrode at a time beginning after the beginning of the inspiration phase, and the duration and magnitude of the stimuli sufficient to still the diaphragm of the patient resulting in a substantial amount of air trapped in at least one lung and preventing exhalation of the trapped air for a long enough period of time to inhibit the beginning of the next breath, and then after the period of time has lapsed, allowing a delayed exhalation outflow of the trapped air thereby reducing the breathing rate of the patient.
Patent Citations (85)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4129125(A) | 1978-12-01 | Lester et al. | Examiner |
| US4827935(A) | 1989-05-01 | Geddes et al. | Applicant |
| US4830008(A) | 1989-05-01 | Meer | Applicant |
| US5056519(A) | 1991-10-01 | Vince | Applicant |
| US5146918(A) | 1992-09-01 | Kallok et al. | Applicant |
| US5170802(A) | 1992-12-01 | Mehra | Applicant |
| US5265604(A) | 1993-11-01 | Vince | Applicant |
| US5483969(A) | 1996-01-01 | Testerman et al. | Applicant |
| US5485851(A) | 1996-01-01 | Erickson | Applicant |
| US6006134(A) | 1999-12-01 | Hill et al. | Examiner |
| US6132384(A) | 2000-10-01 | Christopherson et al. | Applicant |
| US6212435(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Lattner et al. | Applicant |
| US6266564(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US6360740(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Ward et al. | Applicant |
| US6415183(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Scheiner et al. | Applicant |
| US6449507(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US6463327(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Lurie et al. | Applicant |
| US6532388(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US6537228(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Lambert | Applicant |
| US6542774(B2) | 2003-04-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US6587726(B2) | 2003-07-01 | Lurie et al. | Applicant |
| US6589188(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Street et al. | Applicant |
| US6641542(B2) | 2003-11-01 | Cho et al. | Applicant |
| US6684101(B2) | 2004-01-01 | Daum | Applicant |
| US6718208(B2) | 2004-04-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| USRE38705(E) | 2005-02-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US6881192(B1) | 2005-04-01 | Park | Applicant |
| US6890306(B2) | 2005-05-01 | Poezevera | Applicant |
| US6928324(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Park et al. | Applicant |
| US6934583(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Weinberg et al. | Applicant |
| US6937903(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Schuler et al. | Applicant |
| US6964641(B2) | 2005-11-01 | Cho et al. | Applicant |
| US7025730(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Cho et al. | Applicant |
| US7070568(B1) | 2006-07-01 | Koh | Applicant |
| US7077132(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Berthon-Jones | Applicant |
| US7082331(B1) | 2006-07-01 | Park et al. | Examiner |
| US7094207(B1) | 2006-08-01 | Koh | Applicant |
| US7155278(B2) | 2006-12-01 | King et al. | Applicant |
| US7179229(B1) | 2007-02-01 | Koh | Applicant |
| US7184829(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US7200442(B1) | 2007-04-01 | Koh et al. | Applicant |
| US7212862(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Park et al | Applicant |
| US7223244(B1) | 2007-05-01 | Koh | Applicant |
| US7225019(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Jahns et al. | Applicant |
| US7225021(B1) | 2007-05-01 | Park et al. | Applicant |
| US7245971(B2) | 2007-07-01 | Park et al. | Applicant |
| US7269457(B2) | 2007-09-01 | Shafer et al. | Applicant |
| US7269459(B1) | 2007-09-01 | Koh | Applicant |
| US7277757(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Casavant et al. | Applicant |
| US7340302(B1) | 2008-03-01 | Falkenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US7357775(B1) | 2008-04-01 | Koh | Applicant |
| US7361146(B1) | 2008-04-01 | Bharmi | Applicant |
| US7363086(B1) | 2008-04-01 | Koh et al. | Applicant |
| US7371220(B1) | 2008-05-01 | Koh et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0003799(A1) | 2001-06-01 | Boveja | Examiner |
| US2003/0195571(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Burnes et al. | Examiner |
| US2005/0085734(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Tehrani | Applicant |
| US2005/0085865(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Tehrani | Applicant |
| US2005/0085866(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Tehrani | Applicant |
| US2005/0085867(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0085868(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0085869(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Tehrani et al. | Examiner |
| US2005/0165457(A1) | 2005-07-01 | Benser et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0197588(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Freeberg | Examiner |
| US2005/0288729(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Libbus et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0030894(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Tehrani | Applicant |
| US2006/0036294(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Tehrani | Applicant |
| US2006/0122662(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Tehrani et al. | Examiner |
| US2006/0142815(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Tehrani et al. | Examiner |
| US2006/0149334(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0155341(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0167523(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0229677(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Moffitt et al. | Examiner |
| US2006/0247729(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0021795(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Tehrani | Applicant |
| US2008/0154330(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0161878(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0167695(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0177347(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0183239(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0183240(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0183264(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Bly et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0188903(A1) | 2008-08-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0188904(A1) | 2008-08-01 | Tehrani et al. | Applicant |
| WO2008/092246 | 2008-08-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (40)
- Redline, Susan et al., Beyond the Fat Boy, Journal of Applied Physiology 2005, vol. 99: pp. 1243-1244.Applicant
- Esler, Murray et al., Is Obstructive Sleep Apnea the Cause of Sympathetic Nervous Activation in Human Obesity?, Journal of Applied Physiology 2006, vol. 100, pp. 11-12.Applicant
- Caples, Sean M. et al., Influence of Cardiac Function and Failure on Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Journal of Applied Physiology 2005, vol. 99, pp. 2433-2439.Applicant
- Punjabi, Naresh M. et al., Disorders of Glucose Metabolism in Sleep Apnea, Journal of Applied Physiology 2005, vol. 99, pp. 1998-2007.Applicant
- Leuenberger, Urs A. et al., Hypoxia Augments Apnea-Induced Peripheral Vasoconstriction in Humans, Journal of Applied Physiology 2001, vol. 90, pp. 1516-1522.Applicant
- Oliven, Arie, et al., Upper Airway Response to Electrical Stimulation of the Genioglossus in Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Journal of Applied Physiology 2003, vol. 95, pp. 2023-2029.Applicant
- Parati, Gianfranco et al., Sleep Apnea: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Relation to Cardiovascular Risk, Am Journal Physiological Society 2007, vol. 293, pp. R1671-R1683.Applicant
- Gottfried, Stewart B. et al., Effects of Phrenic Stimulation on Upper Airway Resistance in Anesthetized Dogs, Am Physiological Society 1983, 0161-7567/83, pp. 419-426.Applicant
- Planas, Roque F. et al., Diaphragmatic Pressures: Transvenous vs. Direct Phrenic Nerve Stimulation, Am Physiological Society 1985, 0161-7567/85, pp. 269-273.Applicant
- Series, F. et al., Site of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation-Induced Upper Airway Collapse: Influence of Expiratory Time, Journal of Applied Physiology 2002, vol. 92, pp. 665-671.Applicant
- Kingma, John G. Jr. et al., Neuromodulation Therapy Does Not Influence Blood Flow Distribution or Left-Ventricular Dynamics During Acute Myocardial Ischemia, Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical 91 (2001) pp. 47-54.Applicant
- Linderoth, Bengt, MD, PHD et al., Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Syndromes: Role of Animal Models, American Academy of Pain Medicine, vol. 7, No. S14-S26, 2006.Applicant
- Tanaka, Satoshi et al., Mechanisms of Sustained Cutaneous Vasodilation Induced by Spinal Cord Stimulation, Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical 114 (2004) pp. 55-60.Applicant
- Lorenzi-Filho, Geraldo et al., Cheyne-Stokes Respiration in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: Causes and Consequences, Clinics 2005; 60(4):333-44.Applicant
- Brack, Thomas, Cheyne-Stokes Respiration in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure, Swiss Med Wkly 2003; 133:605-610, www.smw.ch.Applicant
- Yumino, Dai et al., Central Sleep Apnea and Cheyne-Stokes Respiration, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 2008, vol. 5, pp. 226-236.Applicant
- Garrido-Garcia, H. et al., Treatment of Chronic Ventilatory Failure Using a Diaphragmatic Pacemaker, Spinal Cord (1998) 36, 310-314.Applicant
- Diedrichs, Holger et al., Symptomatic Relief Precedes Improvement of Myocardial Blood Flow in Patients Under Spinal Coard Stimulation, BioMed Central, 2005, pp. 1-7.Applicant
- Kaneko, S. et al., A New Approach to Respiratory Assist for Phrenic Nerve Paralysis, Trans Am Soc. Artif Intern Organs, 1985, vol. XXXI, pp. 301-304.Applicant
- MacIntyre, Neil R., MD, Setting the Frequency-Tidal Volume Pattern, www.rcjournal.com/contents/03.02/03.02.0266.asp.Applicant
- Kohnlein, T. et al., Central Sleep Apnoea Syndrome in Patients with Chronic Heart Disease: A Critical Review of the Current Literature, Thorax 2002; 57:547-554.Applicant
- Javaheri, Shahrokh, MD, Central Sleep Apnea in Congestive Heart Failure: Prevalence, Mechanisms, Impact, and Therapeutic Options, Seminars in Respiratory and Critcal Care Medicine, 2005, vol. 26, No. 1.Applicant
- Dobelle, William H., Use of Breathing Pacemakers to Suppress Intractable Hiccups of up to Thirteen Years Duration, ASAIO Journal 1999, pp. 524-525.Applicant
- Series, Frederic, Assessment of Upper Airway Dynamics in Awake Patients with Sleep Apnea Using Phrenic Nerve Stimulation, Am Journal Respir Crit Care Med, 2000, vol. 162., pp. 795-800.Applicant
- Bilgutay, A.M. et al., Augmented Ventilation by Synchronous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation, Trans. Amer. Soc. Artif. Int. Organs, 1970, vol. XVI, pp. 213-217.Applicant
- Yasuma, Fumihiko et al., Eight-Year Follow-Up Study of a Patient with Central Alveolar Hypoventilation Treated with Diaphragm Pacing, Respiration, 1998; 65:313-316.Applicant
- Handa, Y. et al., Basic Studies on Electrophrenic Respiration Part 2—Assisted Ventilation by the Synchronous Electrophrenic Respirator, Medical and Biological Engineering, Jul. 1976.Applicant
- Kimura, M. et al., A Heart-Rate-Responsive Diaphragm Pacemaker, Med. & Biol. Eng. & Comput., 1987, 25, 458-462.Applicant
- Kimura, M. et al., Heart Rate and Body Temperature Sensitive Diaphragm Pacing, Med. & Biol. Eng. & Comput. 1992, 30, 155-161.Applicant
- Kimura, M. et al., Addition to an RF-Coupled Phrenic Nerve Stimulator Implant to Provide Outward Transmission of Body Temperature, Med. & Biol. Eng. & Comput. 1986, 24, 659-661.Applicant
- Taira, Takaomi, MD, Ph.D. et al., Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Diaphragm Pacing with a Spinal Cord Stimulator, Elsevier Science, Surg Neurol, 2003; 59:128-32.Applicant
- Chatfield, Paul O. et al., Role of Pulmonary Proprioceptive Reflexes in Suppression of Spontaneous Breathing During Electrophrenic Respiration, Dept. of Physiology, Harvard Medical School, and Dept. of Physiology, Harvard School of Public Health, vol. 163.Applicant
- Sarnoff, Stanley J. et al., Electrophrenic Respiration. III. Mechanism of the Inhibition of Spontaneous Respiration, Dept. of Physiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 1948, vol. 155, pp. 203-207.Applicant
- Sarnoff, Stanley J. et al., Electrophrenic Respiration IV. The Effectiveness of Contralateral Ventilation During Activity of One Phrenic Nerve, Dept. of Physiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 1949, pp. 929-937.Applicant
- Stemmer, Edward A. MD et al., Diaphragmatic Pacing in the Treatment of Hypoventilation Syndrome, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 54, No. 5, 1967, pp. 649-657.Applicant
- Furman, Seymour, MD et al., Transvenous Stimulation of the Phrenic Nerves, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 62, No. 5, 1971, pp. 743-751.Applicant
- Aiyar, Harish et al., Diaphragm Pacing for Chronic Respiratory Insufficient, CRC Press, LLC, 2001, Chapter 9.Applicant
- International Search Report of international application PCT/US2006/044788 (Aug. 15, 2007). 3 pp.Applicant
- Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority of international appiication PCT/US2006/044788 (Apr. 12, 2007), 3 pp.Applicant
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability of international application PCT/US2006/044788 (May 20, 2008). 4 pp.Applicant