US 8,224,022 B2Grant
Connected audio and other media objects
Issue Date:2012-07-17
•23 Claims
•4 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
Various signal processing methods and apparatus are provided. One claim recites a method of linking media to a network resource. The method includes: computing, with an electronic processor on a handheld device, attributes of media used to identify the media; providing, from the handheld device, computed attributes of the media to a network resource, wherein the network resource uses the computed attributes of the media to identify the media or metadata associated with the media; receiving, at the handheld device, metadata associated with the identified media in the network resource. Of course, other combinations and claims are provided as well.
Metadata
Assignee
- Digimarc Corporation
Inventors
- Kenneth L. Levy
- Geoffrey B. Rhoads
Application Information
Application Number:US 12/560,223
Filing Date:2009-09-15
Priority Date:1995-07-27
Art Unit:2624
Classifications
IPC:
G06K9/00
Patent Drawings (4 sheets)
Description
Related Application Data
[0001] This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/927,075 filed Oct. 29, 2007 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,590,259) which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/338,032, filed Jan. 6, 2003 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,349,552), which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/563,664, filed May 2, 2000 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,505,160), which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/476,686, filed Dec. 30, 1999 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,562,392), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/134,782, filed May 19, 1999. The Ser. No. 11/927,075 application is also a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/338,031, filed Jan. 6, 2003 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,957), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/563,664, filed May 2, 2000 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,505,160). The Ser. No. 09/563,664 application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/746,613 filed Nov. 12, 1996 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,122,403), which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/649,419, filed May 16, 1996 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,862,260), PCT Application PCT/US96/06618, filed May 7, 1996, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/508,083, filed Jul. 27, 1995 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,978). The subject matter of the present application is related to that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,862,260, and in co-pending application Ser. No. 08/746,613, filed Nov. 12, 1996 (allowed); Ser. No. 09/343,104, filed Jun. 29, 1999; 60/164,619, filed Nov. 10, 1999; Ser. No. 09/476,686, filed Dec. 30, 1999; Ser. No. 09/503,881, filed Feb. 14, 2000; Ser. No. 09/525,865, filed Mar. 15, 2000; 60/191,778 filed March 24; and Ser. No. 09/547,664, filed Apr. 12, 2000, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Technical Field
[0002] The invention relates to linking audio and other multimedia data objects with metadata and actions via a communication network, e.g., computer, broadcast, wireless, etc.
Background and Summary
[0003] Advances in computer and wireless networking, multimedia coding, and higher bandwidth communication links are creating many new ways to distribute and enjoy multimedia content, such as music and movies. Coding formats for audio like MPEG 1 Layer 3 (MP3) have already caused significant changes in music delivery to consumers. Despite the advances in technology, content distributors and broadcasters still need to address how to effectively promote and sell content.
[0004] This disclosure describes systems and processes for linking audio and other multimedia data objects with metadata and actions via a communication network, e.g., computer, broadcast, wireless, etc. Media objects are transformed into active, connected objects via identifiers embedded into them or their containers. These identifiers can be embedded by the owner or distributor of the media object, or automatically created from the media object. In the context of a user's playback experience, a decoding process extracts the identifier from a media object and possibly additional context information and forwards it to a server. The server, in turn, maps the identifier to an action, such as returning metadata, re-directing the request to one or more other servers, requesting information from another server to identify the media object, etc. If the identifier has no defined action, the server can respond with an option for the user to buy the link and control the resulting action for all objects with the current identifier. The linking process applies to broadcast objects as well as objects transmitted over networks in streaming and compressed file formats.
[0005] Further features will become apparent with reference to the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0006] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating examples of media object linking processes and systems.
[0007] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating media object linking applications.
[0008] FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating receiving metadata associated with media.
Detailed Description
Linking Audio and Other Media Objects Via Identifiers
[0009] The following sections describe systems and processes for linking audio and other media objects to metadata and actions via an identifier. For the sake of illustration, the disclosure focuses on a specific media type, namely audio signals (e.g., music, sound tracks of audio visual works, voice recordings, etc.). However, these systems, their components and processes apply to other types of media signals as well, including video, still images, graphical models, etc. As described further below, an identifier attached to an audio signal is used to connect that signal with metadata and/or programmatic or device actions. In the context of this document, the terms “media object” and “audio object” refer to an electronic form of a media signal and audio signal, respectively. The linking of media signals applies to objects that are transmitted over wire networks (such as a computer network), wireless networks (such as a wireless telephone network), and broadcast (AM, FM, digital broadcast, etc.).
[0010] There are a number of ways to associate an identifier with an audio object. One way to associate the identifier is to insert it in the form of a numeric or alphanumeric code (e.g., binary or M-ary code) in the electronic file in which the audio is stored. Another way to associate the identifier is to embed it as auxiliary data in the audio signal using steganographic methods, such as digital watermarking or other data hiding techniques. Yet another way is to derive the identifier from the audio signal, the table of contents, the file system structure, or its container (e.g., an electronic file or physical package for data like flash memory, Digital Versatile Disk (DVD), minidisk, or compact disk (CD). The physical media may have identifying characteristics, such as a unique identifier or encoded metadata, or other attributes from which an identifier can be derived (e.g., CD disk wobble).
[0011] When the identifier is associated with metadata or actions, it transforms the media object into a “linked” object. The identifier travels with the object through distribution, including in some cases, through physical distribution in packaged media and through electronic distribution (broadcast or network communication). The identifier may travel within the same band as the audio object, such as a watermark, or via a separate band, such as a file header or footer or separate broadcast band. A decoding device or programmatic process extracts the identifier from the object and uses it to retrieve related data or actions (“metadata”). In the case of an audio object, like a song, the metadata typically includes the title, artist, lyrics, copyright owner, sound recording owner, information about buying or sampling opportunities and URLs to this type of data as well as web sites and other programs and devices. Linked actions include device or programmatic processes for electronically establishing a license, transferring content (either streaming or download), sending an email, recording marketing data about a transaction, etc. The identifier allows a fan of a particular type of music or artist to get more information about the music and to buy more music. From the perspective of the artists and record labels, the identifier provides an additional opportunity to promote their music and sell content, concert tickets, etc.
[0012] In addition, in some implementations where identifier linking transactions are monitored, it enables the vendors of music to gather data about electronic transactions triggered by the link. For example, users of information may choose to provide information about themselves when they register their decoding device or software with the system. A user ID or other context information may then be recorded when the identifier is extracted and used to trigger a transaction. Many entities involved in the distribution of media signals can benefit from the linking capability. Artists can link their music to information about themselves and provide electronic buying opportunities for music, concert tickets, clothing, etc. Rights holding organizations can use the link to inform users about itself and licensing opportunities. In some cases, the link may also be used to monitor playing and distribution of copies of the music. Record labels can link their music to information about the artist, the label, electronic buying opportunities, etc. Electronic retailers can increase sales by linking users to opportunities to sample and buy additional music (via download or streaming delivery over a wire or wireless network). Conventional brick and mortar retailers can use linking to provide information about the music and to provide buying opportunities. Radio stations and other broadcasters can use the linking capability to bring users to their web sites, creating advertising revenue, to provide electronic buying opportunities for music, concert tickets, clothing items, etc. These and other forms of linked metadata and actions may be implemented in various combinations in different application scenarios.
[0013] Depending on the application, the identifier may identify the media object in which it is embedded, or entities, things or actions other than that particular media object. One type of identifier is an object ID that identifies an audio object. This identifier may be a number associated with the object, such as its International Standard Recording Code (ISRC). Another type of identifier is distributor ID that identifies the distributor of the audio object. Another type of identifier is a broadcaster ID that identifiers the broadcaster of the audio object. Of course, more than one identifier may be encoded into an audio object or its container. In the event that an object ID is not encoded with an audio object, but instead, a distributor or broadcaster identifier is encoded with the object, other context information, such as the time of play back or distribution, location of distribution, etc. may be used to identify the audio object as part of the linking process. An example is a radio station that marks its broadcasts with a station ID and maintains a playlist database with the air times of each audio object. At decoding time, the station ID is extracted and used along with context information such as the air time of the audio object to look up the audio object or its corresponding metadata and actions. This approach enables the linking system to provide audio object specific metadata or actions even without requiring a unique object identifier in every audio object.
System Implementation
[0014] FIG. 1 is a diagram of a system configuration of linked media objects. In this configuration, an identifier links audio objects to metadata via an electronic network, such as the Internet, a wireless network, or a broadcast network. As depicted in FIG. 1 , an embedding process may be used to encode an identifier in an audio object or its container. In some cases, an embedding process encodes the identifier in the audio file (e.g., a tag in a file header or footer), in the audio signal (a digital watermark), or in the physical packaging. The identifier may also be derived as a function of the audio signal or other information in the file or physical packaging (e.g., track information on a CD). In the case of dynamically derived identifiers, an embedding process is not necessary because the identifier can be derived from the content at decoding time.
[0015] In some application scenarios, the embedding process interacts with a registration process to get an identifier. The embedding process provides information about the object (e.g., a title and artist name, an ISRC, name of distributor, etc.). In response, the registration process provides an identifier and stores a database record of the association between identifier and the object or other information used in decoding to identify the object, such as its distributor or broadcaster. The registration process may be used to assign an identifier to an audio object and to distributors or broadcasters of audio objects. The embedding and registration processes may occur before the audio object is distributed to consumers, or sometime thereafter, such as when a user transfers (e.g., “rips”) an a media object from one format to another (e.g., a packaged format to an electronic file format such as a compressed file format).
[0016] Once registered, an interactive or automated mapping process associates the identifier with data or actions. The registration process creates a database of identifiers and associates the identifiers with corresponding media objects, distributors, broadcasters, etc. The mapping process associates the identifiers with corresponding metadata or actions.
[0017] Once associated with an audio object and metadata, the identifier transforms the audio object into a linked object. The identifier remains with the object through distribution, although some embedding processes are more robust than others to intentional or unintentional distortion/removal of the identifier. There a variety of different distribution scenarios. Some examples depicted in FIG. 1 include transferring an audio object over a computer network, streaming the object over a computer network, or broadcasting it (e.g., AM/FM broadcasting, digital broadcasting, broadcasting over wireless carriers, etc.). Whatever the distribution process, a user ultimately receives the linked object in a player, tuner, or capture device.
[0018] To activate the linked object, a decoding process extracts the identifier and uses it to access associated data or actions. The decoding process may be implemented as a separate program or device, or integrated into a player, tuner, or some other capture device, such as listening devices that convert ambient audio waves to an electronic signal and then extract the identifier from the signal.
[0019] In the configuration shown in FIG. 1 , the decoding process forwards the extracted identifier to a communication application, which in turn, forwards it in a message to a server. The decoding process or the communication application may add additional context information to the message sent to the to a server. The context information may relate to the user, the user's device, the attributes of the session (time of playback, format of playback, type of distribution (e.g., broadcast or transmitted audio file), etc.) Based on identifier and optional context information, the server determines an associated action to perform, such as re-directing an identifier or context data to another server, returning metadata (including programs, content, etc.), downloading content, logging a transaction record. To find the associated action or actions, the server maps the identifier to actions based on the information established in the mapping process. The server may: 1) look up the data and actions in a local database stored in its memory subsystem; 2) route the identifier to one or more other servers via the network, which in turn look up related actions and data associated with the identifier; or 3) perform some combination of actions 1 and 2.
[0020] In the first case, server 1 returns data or actions associated with the identifier. The server may look up related data based on the identifier alone, or based on the identifier and other context information. Context information may be information provided by the user, by the user's computer or device, or by some other process or device. In the second case, the server looks up one or more addresses associated with the identifier and forwards the identifier and/or possibly other context data to secondary servers at these addresses via conventional networking protocols. Again, this context data may include data from the user, the user's computer, some other device or database. For example, server 1 might query a remote database for instructions about how to process an identifier. These instruction may specify data to return to the communication application or to forward to another server, which in turn, looks up associated data and returns it to the communication application. A server may return data that an audio player displays to the user or uses to control rendering of the content. For example, the server can tell the player that the object contains inappropriate content for children. The player or user can make decisions about whether or how to play the material based on this information.
[0021] Both the server and the player can adopt a set of rules. The server rules may be used to control what the server returns in response to an identifier and context data. The player rules may be used to control what the player displays to the user or how it renders the content based on data returned from a server.
[0022] Either the first server, or a server one or more levels of indirection from the identifier may return data and programmatic actions to a player via the communication application. Each server in these levels of indirection receives a database key, such as an identifier or context information, from the previous server, and uses it to look up corresponding actions. These actions may include returning data or programs to the communication application or to previous servers in the routing path of the message from the communication application. Also, the servers may route requests for information or actions to other servers. The server or servers may return data or perform actions in response to the identifier (or other context data) that do not directly impact the decoding process, or the device in which it operates.
[0023] The system depicted in FIG. 1 allows several different interested parties to establish services linked via the identifier. For example, server 1 can be configured to provide generic promotional and/or licensing information associated with an identifier. If the content owner, distributor, retailer, artist or other related party wishes to provide information or services for a connected object, then server 1 may also route the identifier for that object, and possibly context information, the address of the communication application, and instructions, to servers maintained by these entities. These servers, in turn, provide promotional, sales, or licensing information, and electronic buying or licensing opportunities specific to that entity back to the consumer over the network via the communication application.
[0024] In the context of a network configuration, Internet protocols may be used to return data to the communication application or to the device or system in which it operates. The communication application may be implemented in a web browser, such as Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator. Examples of ways of exchanging information between a client player and a server include returning a web page with metadata and program scripts designed to run on the end user's system. The metadata itself may include active links, such as URLs to other network resources, such as a web site or some other network service. The path of the identifier from the decoding process, and the return path from a server to the communication application may include one or more hops through a wire or wireless connection using standard wire and wireless communication protocols like TCP/IP, HTTP, XML, WAP, Bluetooth, etc. In addition, data returned to the user may be routed through one or more servers that may forward the data, and in some cases, augment the data or modify it in some fashion.
[0025] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating applications of the system depicted in FIG. 1 . In the application scenarios depicted in FIG. 2 , an embedding process encodes an object identifier (OID) into an audio file, such as an ID3 tag in the header of an MP3 file or audio frame headers in the MP3 file. FIG. 2 shows two embedding scenarios. The first is an MP3 distributor that embeds OIDs in MP3 files before transmitting them over a network, such as the Internet, typically via a web site interface. The second is a file ripping process where a programmed computer or other device extracts an audio object from packaged media such as a CD and converts it into a coded file format like MP3. In the latter case, the ripping process may extract metadata from the CD, such as the table of contents, and use this metadata as a key to a database (CDDB) to get information about the songs on the CD, such as title, artists, etc. The table of contents or other metadata from a package medium, such as optical or magnetic storage or flash memory, may be hashed into an index to a database entry that stores information about the media signal stored on the medium. The ripping process uses the information returned from the database to identify the audio objects on the packaged media so that they can be associated with an OID. This is an example of identifying information used to associate an OID with an audio object. As part of the coding process, the ripping process inserts the OID in the file header of the MP3 file.
[0026] Later, when a user opens or plays the marked MP3 in a player, such as a software player like the real player, Liquid Audio player, Windows Media Player (WMP), WinAmp, MusicMatch, etc., a plug-in software module in the player extracts the OID and forwards it to a server via an Internet connection. The plug-in may establish its own Internet connection, or pass the OID to an Internet Browser, which in turn, establishes a connection (if one is not already present) with the server. As an intermediate step, the plug-in may display a window with user options, such as “learn more about the song”, “play the song”, or both. The user can then choose to get more information by actuating the first or third options in the user interface window, which cause the plug-in to forward the OID to the server.
[0027] The server then returns a web page associated with the OID, or re-directs the OID to another server (e.g., one maintained by the content distributor or owner), which in turn, returns a web page of information about the object and links to related actions (e.g., a link to a licensing server, a link to a server for buying and downloading related music etc.). The licensing server may be programmed to download software players and new music offerings compatible with those players. For instance, the licensing server may provide software for decrypting, decoding, and playing electronically distributed music according to usage rules packaged with the electronically distributed music. In this application scenario, the linking of the MP3 file enables the content owner to market music and products that promote the sale of audio objects in other formats, included formats protected with encryption, watermark copy managements schemes, etc.
[0028] In the event that a media object is not linked, the decoding and server processes can be programmed to enable the user to purchase a link for the object. For example in one scenario, the player plug-in displays a graphic for a link information indicating that the link is available after determining that an OID is not in the file. If the user clicks on the graphic, the plug-in displays more information about the procedure for purchasing or renting a link. This information may be provided in conjunction with querying the server and displaying information returned from the server, or alternatively, providing pre-programmed information incorporated into the plug-in. If the user is interested in purchasing the link, he or she can then enter input (e.g., click on a button such as “Get Link”) that initiates the process of registering an OID with the object and associating metadata or actions with the OID. The process of registering the OID and associating the OID with metadata or actions may be performed as described in this document. This scenario provides yet another mechanism for transforming content into connected content.
[0029] There are many possible variations to the applications scenarios illustrated in FIG. 2 . During the file ripping process (or some other embedding process), the embedder may generate a unique ID from the metadata read from the packaged media on which the media object resides. One example of such an ID is the number derived from CD metadata currently used to index information in the CDDB database. This ID may then be embedded in the audio object or its file header/footer. During OID registration, the registration process may inform the embedding process that the OID (and thus, the object for which it was derived) has not been associated with metadata or actions. In this case, the user may be given an opportunity to purchase the link, either at the time of ripping, or in the future, wherever the object travels. In the latter case, the OID in the object is associated with an option to buy the link and customize the data and/or actions associated with that link. Rather than link to promotional information, the OID gives users an option to buy or rent the link and provides them with an opportunity to customize it (e.g., linking it to a custom web site). Once customized, other users that open or play the file will then be able to link to the customized information or actions.
[0030] To assert control over the type of customization that users may perform, the registration and mapping processes can place constraints on the types of metadata and actions that users can link to a media object.
[0031] In the multimedia content industry, there are typically many rights holders and entities involved in the distribution process. This may present a conflict when linking a media object to one entity. One way to address this problem is have an object link to many different entities. For example, the server could map an OID to many entities and return links to retailers, distributors, record labels and artists. Another way to address it is to encode additional information about the distributor in the OID. For example, the OID includes fields that identify the object and its distributor. If a user activates the link to purchase products, including media objects, then the distributor name is logged with the purchase and that distributor is credited with royalties associated with the transaction. The distributor field may also be used as a key to look up the appropriate action for the OID, such as re-directing the OID to the web server of the entity associated with that OID. In this approach, even if the OID directs a user to a record label's website, the distributor field can be used to credit the distributor with a royalty for the linking transaction.
[0032] The entity responsible for maintaining a web site linked via on identifier can make deals with online resources for providing data about a media object such as lyrics, song titles, radio station play lists. The website may link to this information, access it via a database manager, etc.
File Identifiers
[0033] One form of identifier is an identifier that is inserted in an audio object file, but in a distinct field from the audio signal itself. Some examples are file headers and footers. This file identifier may be assigned before or after distribution of the audio object to consumers. In addition, it may be derived from the audio signal or other information in the file. For example, an identifier generator may derive a unique or sufficiently unique identifier from a portion of a music signal. A variety of methods for generating a unique numbers based on a unique collection of numbers may be used.
[0034] The process of embedding a file identifier may be done at the time of encoding or transcoding a file. For example, the file identifier may be inserted during a ripping process, such as when a device or programmatic process converts a song from a format stored on packaged media, like a CD or DVD, to an electronic, and compressed form, such as MP3 or some other audio codec. As another example, the file identifier may be inserted when a device or programmatic process transcodes an electronic music file from one codec format to another. Yet another example is where a file is taken from a digital or analog uncompressed format, and placed in another format for distribution.
Identifiers Embedded in Audio Signal
[0035] Another way to associate an identifier with an audio signal is to embed the identifier in the audio signal using steganographic methods, such as digital watermarking or other data hiding techniques. Many of such techniques have been developed and are described in published articles and patents. Watermarking methods are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/503,881. Other examples of methods for encoding and decoding auxiliary signals into audio signals include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,862,260, 5,940,135 and 5,945,932. For more information on steganographic applications, see the patent applications incorporated by reference.
[0036] The steganographic embedding method may be performed in a batch process. Consider a distributor of electronic music via the Internet or some other network, or a broadcaster of music such as a radio station. In each case, the distributor and broadcaster have a collection of audio objects. The embedding process may operate on this collection of objects in a batch process by retrieving an electronic version, encoding an identifier obtained from the registration process, and returning the marked version for later distribution or broadcasting. In some cases, it is desirable to do watermark embedding in an iterative process in a studio environment to encode the watermark with an intensity that achieves desired perceptibility and robustness requirements.
[0037] The steganographic embedding method may also be performed at the time of transmission of an electronic file or broadcast of the audio object. In the case of distribution via a network such as the Internet (e.g., streaming or file download), real time embedding enables the embedding process to also embed context information that is specific to the consumer (or the consumer's computer) that has electronically ordered the object. For example, when the user requests a file in a streaming or a compressed file format via the Internet using her browser, the distributor's server can request information (perhaps voluntary) about the user to be associated with the transmitted object. Later, the decoding process or the servers that map the identifier to actions or metadata can use this information to determine the types of information to provide or responsive action to perform.
[0038] In the case of broadcasting, real time embedding enables the identifier to be steganographically embedded throughout an electronic version of the audio signal just before, or as part of the broadcasting process.
[0039] An object or distributor ID (as well as other identifiers or context information) can be embedded in the payload of a watermark that is also used for copy control. Portion of the watermark can be used to control whether the object can be played, transferred, recorded, etc., while another part can be used to carry identifiers and other metadata for linking functions described in this document. Alternatively, entirely separate watermark encoding and decoding methods may be used for copy control and linking functions.
[0040] A watermarking process may be used to encode different watermarks in the various channels of an audio signal. Message information may be embedded in one or more channels, while synchronization or orientation signals used to detect and decode the message information may be encoded in other channels. Also, different messages (e.g., different identifiers) may be encoded in different channels. At decoding time, the different identifiers can trigger different actions or link to different data.
[0041] In broadcasting applications, an identifier may be encoded along with the broadcast of the associated media signal by modulating a subcarrier of the main carrier frequency used to transmit the media signal. The subcarrier conveys auxiliary data such as the identifier, while the main carrier conveys the associated media signal To reduce audibility of the auxiliary data (e.g., the identifier(s)) encoded in the sub-carrier, the data can be randomized by applying it to a pseudorandom or random number by some function that may be inverted in the decoding process, e.g., multiplication or exclusive OR functions. One example of sub-carrier encoding and decoding is Active HSDS 97 developed by Seiko Corporation.
Identifiers in Digital Radio Broadcasts
[0042] Some forms of digital radio broadcasts support transmission of metadata along with media signals. This metadata can also be used to carry one or more identifiers that are mapped to metadata or actions. The metadata can be encoded at the time of broadcast or prior to broadcasting. Decoding of the identifier may be performed at the digital receiver. In particular, the digital receiver receives the broadcast data, extracts the identifier, and either automatically, or at the user's direction, forwards the identifier to a server to look up the associated metadata or action.
Dynamic Identifier Extraction from Audio Content or Related Data
[0043] As noted above, another way to associate an identifier with a corresponding audio signal is to derive the identifier from the signal. This approach has the advantage that the embedding process is unnecessary. Instead, the decoding process can generate the identifier from the audio object. In this case, the decoder computes a fingerprint of the audio signal based on a specified fingerprinting algorithm, The fingerprint is a number derived from a digital audio signal that serves as a statistically unique identifier of that signal, meaning that there is a high probability that the fingerprint was derived from the audio signal in question. One component of fingerprint algorithm is a hash algorithm. The hash algorithm may be applied to a selected portion of a music file (e.g., the first 10 seconds) to create a fingerprint. It may be applied to discrete samples in this portion, or to attributes that are less sensitive to typical audio processing. Examples of less sensitive attributes include most significant bits of audio samples or a low pass filtered version of the portion. Examples of hashing algorithms include MD5, MD2, SHA, SHA1.
[0044] As an aside, fingerprinting may also be used to determine whether an audio signal has been watermarked. The fingerprinting application can evaluate a fingerprint for a received object and compare it with one for a watermarked object (or unmarked object) to determine whether the object is likely to be watermarked. Certain fingerprints can be associated with certain types of watermark methods. Using the fingerprint, a decoding device can select an appropriate watermark decoding system for the object.
[0045] While specifically discussed in the context of audio objects, the fingerprinting process applies to other types of multimedia content as well, including still images, video, graphics models, etc. For still images and video, the identifier can be derived dynamically from a compressed or uncompressed version of the image or video signal. The fingerprinting process may be tuned to generate a specific identifier based on the type of file format. For example, the process extracts the file format from the file (e.g., from a header or footer), then uses a fingerprinting process tailored for that type of file (e.g., a hash of a compressed image or video frame). The dynamic identifier computed by this process may be associated with metadata and/or actions using the processes and systems described in this document.
Registration Process
[0046] One way to implement the registration process is to build client and server application programs that communicate over a computer network using standard network communication protocols. The client may be implemented as a software program that provides identifying information about an audio object. It can obtain the information by prompting the user for the identifying information, or from extracting it from the audio object or its container. The server may be implemented as a database management program that manages identifiers and corresponding audio objects. When queried to provide an identifier for particular identifying information, the program checks whether it has already assigned an identifier to an object based on the identifying information. If so, it returns that identifier that has already been assigned. If not, it assigns a new identifier number, creates a new entry in the database for that number and its associated identifying information.
[0047] The type of identifier used to link audio objects varies with the application. As such, the registration process may vary as well. One type of identifier is a unique identifier for an audio object. Another type of identifier is one that identifies some attribute of the audio object, but does not uniquely identify it, such as a distributor or broadcaster identifier. This type of identifier requires additional context information to uniquely identify the audio object at the time of linking it to actions or metadata. For these types of identifiers, the registration process provides information identifying the attribute of the audio object, such as its distributor or broadcaster. In response, the server provides an identifier that may be embedded in several audio objects that share that attribute.
[0048] One example is a broadcaster ID, such as a radio station ID. Audio broadcast by the radio station is embedded with this radio station ID. To identify the object, context information such as the play time captured at the tuner is used along with the radio station ID extracted from the received audio signal to identify the audio object. The decoding process forwards this information to a server. Using the radio station ID and context information, the server maps the ID to an appropriate action. This may include querying a radio station's playlist database for an object identifier based on the station ID and context information. The server can then map the object identifier to an action or metadata based on the object ID returned from the playlist database. Other scenarios are possible. For example, the server could forward the station ID, context data and decoder address to a radio station server, which in turn, looks up the appropriate action or metadata (e.g., web page) and sends it to the device that decoded the station ID.
[0049] Broadcast content can also be associated with object identifiers. One way to implement the identifier assignment process is to allocate a unique set of identifiers with each broadcaster/distributor. Those broadcasters or distributors are then free to assign the identifiers to media objects as they wish. Once they complete the identifier assignment process, they may then associate the identifiers with the metadata or actions in a mapping process.
Embedding Process
[0050] The embedding process may be integrated into a software program along with the client of the registration process described in the previous section. This integration of registration and embedding functions is particularly suited to a batch embedder, where processing time required to request an identifier is less of a concern.
[0051] In real time embedding, the identifier or identifiers are preferably available for associated audio objects before embedding begins. For example, the identifiers can be maintained in a local database on the embedding computer or device and indexed by object title. Distributor and broadcast identifiers are more straightforward because they may be applied to several different audio objects.
[0052] The embedding process may also be implemented in an embedding clearinghouse system. The embedding clearinghouse is a computer or other electronic system that analyzes media objects and embeds one or more links in the media objects. The clearinghouse may be implemented in a server on a network, such as the Internet and operate on content in a “push,” “pull,” or some combination of push and pull models. In the push model, users and other systems send media objects to the embedding clearinghouse for analysis and embedding. The pull model, the clearinghouse has the capability to search for and gather media objects for embedding and analysis. One example of this pull model is an Internet search process called a spider that crawls the Internet, searching for media objects to analyze and embed with one or more identifying links.
[0053] The embedding clearinghouse analyzes a media object (perhaps based on out of band data like a file header or footer) and inserts an identifier. This identifier may link to a metadata and actions, such as re-direction to a web site offering products, services, and information related to the content. The embedding clearinghouse may incorporate search engine technology to execute a key word search based on information from the media object and then associate the media object with a series of related URLs returned from the Internet search. The process may be automatic, or with some user input to select which sub-set of links should be inserted.
[0054] The embedding clearinghouse may also offer an identifier embedding services for those wanting to link their media objects with metadata, actions, etc. In this application scenario, the embedding clearinghouse may be implemented as an Internet server that is accessible via a web page using conventional network communication and web protocols. To access the server, users visit a web page using an Internet browser. In exchange for a fee, which may be tendered electronically over the Internet from the user's computer to the server, the server provides an embedding service to embed an identifier into a media object uploaded from the user via the user's computer and Internet connection. The user can select the information to associate with a media object, such as generic identifying information (e.g., title, author, owner), generic licensing information, or special information or actions. The generic information is hosted by the provider of the embedding clearinghouse server, while the special purpose information and actions are accessed through re-direction. In particular, the provider of the clearinghouse server links the embedded identifier to an address or set of addresses of servers that provide the special information or actions. Then at decoding time, the decoding process sends the identifier to the provider's server, which in turn, redirects the identifier to a secondary server or servers that provide special purpose information or actions (e.g., redirect to a web page of the content owner, download related content, provide electronic licensing services, etc.).
Decoding the ID and Embedded Context Data
[0055] The implementation details of the decoding process depend on how the identifier is encoded into an audio object or its container. In the case where the identifier is encoded in a file header or footer, the decoder may be a software program or digital hardware that parses the header/footer and forwards it to the communication application. One way to implement this type of decoder is to integrate it into a media player as a plug in program. Examples of media players include Windows Media Player from Microsoft, Liquid Audio player from Liquid Audio, Winamp, Real Player from Real Networks. Preferably, the plug-in gives the user visual feedback that the identifier has been detected and displays a window with options to access more information or actions available via the link. For example, the user can be presented with a user interfaces prompting the user to click for more information or buying opportunities. If the user selects these options, the plug-in forwards the user selections and identifier to the communication application, which forwards them to the server (e.g., server 1, FIG. 1 ).
[0056] In the case where the identifier is steganographically encoded in the audio object, a corresponding decoder extracts the identifier. This type of decoder may be implemented as a plug in to a software player as described in the previous paragraph. It may also be implemented in a tuner for broadcast content, or in a listening device that captures audio from the ambient environment.
[0057] In the case where the identifier is derived from the content or container metadata, the decoder captures the pertinent portion of the audio object, and generates the identifier as described above. This type of decoder can be implemented in a software or hardware player, a tuner, etc.
[0058] The decoder may collect identifiers in response to a user request while objects containing these identifiers are being played. For example, when the user is playing music, he may like a song and want to buy it or get more information. This feature may be implemented by building an interface that has a button or voice recognition that enables the user to request information or a buy/license opportunity. Once captured, identifiers can be forwarded along with user instructions to the appropriate server.
[0059] However, one particularly useful feature is to enable the user to fetch information and make orders from music as the music is playing. The system described previously supports this feature because the decoding process can forward the identifier or identifiers, embedded context information, or additional context information (user information, play time, broadcast type, file type, player type, operating system type) to the communication application as the music is playing. The user can trigger the linking action by pressing a “fetch” button, or saying fetch to a voice activated input device that causes the decoding device to package a message and invoke the communication application (e.g., Internet browser). In turn, the communication application forwards the message to a server that parses the message and determines the associated action.
[0060] The activation of the “fetch it” feature may be made on a handheld device that communicates with a decoding device in a tuner via a wireless connection. For example, a user may press a button on a remote control device, like a key chain, which sends a wireless signal to a receiver in the tuner. The receiver invokes the decoding process. The tuner may also send metadata from the server to the remote control device for display using a similar wireless connection. Infrared or RF transceivers, for example, may be used to communicate the data back and forth.
[0061] The decoding device may also provide continuous decoding of identifiers. When the user requests a “fetch,” the identifier and context information for the current song may be forwarded to the server. Also, the decoding device may automatically fetch generic information such as song title and artist so that this information is immediately available to the user.
[0062] Another possible implementation is to temporarily buffer identifiers extracted from some predetermined number of the most recent songs, titles, etc. These identifiers can be stored along with other metadata, such as a time stamp, to inform the user when they were captured. The user can then select one or more of the items to send to the server for more information or related actions.
[0063] These features may be implemented in one or more devices. While the example above discusses a remote control device and a separate tuner with a decoder, these functions may be integrated into a single device, such as a car stereo, phone handset, personal digital assistant, and a variety of other types of players or tuners.
[0064] The identifier enables dynamic linking. Dynamic linking enables the identifier encoded with a media object to remain fixed, while the metadata or actions associated with that identifier can be changed. To change the associated metadata, the mapping process edits the identifier database to associate new metadata or actions with an identifier. The mapping process can be automated to change metadata or actions associated with an identifier at periodic intervals or in response to system events. In addition, a user may change the associated metadata or actions interactively at any time. To facilitate access to the database, a web based interface can be added to the database.
[0065] Dynamically linked data returned from a server to a player environment can be displayed to the user in a variety of ways. One way is to display it in a web page or user interface window of a player. The data can be animated by scrolling it across the visual display. The data can also be displayed in the form of HTML links, which, when activated, cause the download of other data or initiate actions, such as playing streaming content from a server.
Server Types
[0066] As discussed elsewhere, the servers used to link identifiers to actions may be programmed to provide a variety of actions including:
-
- [0067] returning data and HTML links (e.g., in the form of an HTML document, scripts, etc.)
- [0068] downloading media signals in streaming or file format
- [0069] performing an electronic transaction (selling products like CDs, DVDs, concert tickets, etc. via computer transaction using credit cards, digital money, etc.)
- [0070] establishing a license to use a linked media object
- [0071] re-directing to another server
- [0072] performing database look up operations for related information, links, actions
- [0073] performing database look up to uniquely identify a media object based on distributor/broadcaster ID and other context information
- [0074] creating a transaction log
[0075] This is by no means in exhaustive list. Another type of server action is to initiate a process of searching a database, a collection of databases or the Internet for additional information related to a linked media object. This type of search service may be performed continuously and the results associated with the identifier. Then, in response to a request from a decoding process, the server can return a digest of the results with links to web pages for additional information.
Communication Application
[0076] The implementation details of the communication application are highly dependent on the type of communication link and protocols used to connect the decoding process to a server. Above, an Internet browser is provided as an example. A browser may be implemented in conventional PCs, handheld devices, wireless phones, stereo systems, set top boxes, etc. However, the communication application need not be based on computer network protocols. For wireless devices, where the marked content is played on wireless carrier frequencies, the communication application can employ wireless communication technology to forward identifiers and context information to servers that map this information to actions or metadata and return it via a wireless carrier frequency to user's handset.
Tracking Transactions and Report Generation
[0077] As depicted in FIG. 1 and described above, the servers for mapping identifiers to actions may be programmed to dispense a transaction log into a log file. A report generation process can then enable users to define and request queries of data from the log file based on a particular identifier, a particular type of context information (time frame, geographic location, user demographics, etc.), a particular action, etc.
Capture Devices
[0078] As noted above, the decoding process may be implemented in a variety of devices or software that process media objects. These devices and software include programmable devices such as personal computers, personal digital assistants, telephone handsets, set-top boxes, personal stereos, hi-fi components, tuners, receivers, televisions, etc. as well as hardwired devices that may be incorporated into these systems and devices.
[0079] In some contexts, it is useful to implement a recording function. This is particularly true in devices that receive a broadcast or stream of media content and need to capture at least a portion of it to decode an identifier. Examples of these devices are radio receivers, and wireless telephone handsets. The record function may be automatic or user activated. In the latter case, the user actuates an input device to control the record process and optionally the record duration. For example, the user may hear a song that she likes and press record. The device, in turn, records at least a part of the object that is currently being received (an audio, visual or audio visual signal). The user can then decide contemporaneously or at a later time to execute the identifier decoding process on the recorded signal. The recording function can be designed to execute for a pre-determined or user specified duration.
[0080] In the case of radio and television tuners/receivers, the record function can be used to capture a media signal as it is received. In the case of a telephone handset, the record function can be used for a variety of functions, such as recording part of a telephone conversation, recording speech or other ambient audio through a microphone, or recording a media signal received by the handset via a wireless communication channel. The recordings can be compressed and stored in local memory on the device. In addition, they may be annotated with metadata about the media signal, such as a time stamp to show time of capture, a location stamp to show location of capture, metadata extracted from the object (in band or out of band data), etc. The location stamp may be provided by a global positioning device. Some wireless phone systems are capable of computing location of a telephone handset via triangulation. This location data may be used to provide geographic location coordinates or the name of nearby landmark, city name, etc.
[0081] The metadata may be displayed on a display device to help the user remember the context of a particular recording. In addition, it may be provided as context information along with an identifier to a server that links the identifier and context information to metadata or actions.
Transmarking
[0082] In some applications, it may be useful to convert auxiliary information embedded in a media signal from one format to another. This converting process is referred to as transmarking. Transmarking may include converting an out of band identifier like a tag in a header/footer to a watermark or vice versa. It may also involve converting a message in one watermark format to another. The process involves a decoding operating on an input media object, and an encoding of the decoded information into the media object. It may also involve a process for removing the mark originally in the input object to avoid interference with the newly inserted mark.
[0083] There are a variety of reasons to perform transmarking. One is to make the embedded information more robust to the types of processing that the media object is likely to encounter, such as converting from one watermark used in packaged media to another watermark used in compressed, and electronically distributed media, or a watermark used in radio or wireless phone broadcast transmission applications.
[0084] This type of transmarking process may be performed at various stages of a media object's distribution path. As suggest previously, an identifier in a watermark or file header/footer may be encoded at the time of packaging the content for distribution, either in an electronic distribution format or a physical packaged medium, such as an optical disk or magnetic memory device. At some point, the media signal may be converted from one format to another. This format conversion stage is an opportunity to perform transmarking that is tailored for the new format in terms of robustness and perceptibility concerns. The new format may be a broadcast format such as digital radio broadcast, or AM or FM radio broadcast. In this case, the identifier may be transmarked into a watermark or other metadata format that is robust for broadcast applications. The new format may be a compressed file format (e.g., ripping from an optical disk to an MP3 format). In this case, the identifier may be transmarked into a file header/footer or watermark format that is robust and compatible with the compressed file format.
[0085] The transmarking process may leave an existing embedded identifier in tact and layer an additional identifier into the media object. This may include encoding a new watermark that does not interfere with an existing watermark (e.g., insert the new watermark in unmarked portions of the media object or in a non-interfering transform domain). It may also include adding additional or new identifier tags to headers or footers in the file format.
Amplifying an Embedded Identifier
[0086] Rather than converting embedded data to another format, an amplifying process may be used to renew an identifier that has become weakened or separated due to processing of the media object in which it is embedded. In this case, an decoder and encoder pair may be used to determine the current identifier and re-encode it. Of course, the encoder can also choose to embed a new or additional identifiers as well.
[0087] If the previous identifier is lost, the encoder can query an identifier database established in the registration process, passing identifying information about the media object. The database uses the identifying information to find an associated identifier and returns it to the encoder for embedding in the media object.
Concluding Remarks
[0088] Having described and illustrated the principles of the technology with reference to specific implementations, it will be recognized that the technology can be implemented in many other, different, forms. To provide a comprehensive disclosure without unduly lengthening the specification, applicants incorporate by reference the patents and patent applications referenced above. These patents and patent applications provide additional implementation details. They describe ways to implement processes and components of the systems described above. Processes and components described in these applications may be used in various combinations, and in some cases, interchangeably with processes and components described above.
[0089] The particular combinations of elements and features in the above-detailed embodiments are exemplary only; the interchanging and substitution of these teachings with other teachings in this and the incorporated-by-reference patents/applications are also contemplated.
Claims
Certificate of Correction present
The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.
What is claimed is:
1. A method comprising:
computing, using a processor on a handheld device, attributes of an image or video used to identify the image or video;
providing, from the handheld device, the computed attributes of the image or video to a network resource, wherein the network resource uses the computed attributes of the image or video to identify the image or video, or to identify metadata associated with the image or video; and
receiving, at the handheld device, metadata associated with the identified image or video in the network resource.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the metadata comprises audio.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the metadata comprises at least one action.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein computing attributes comprises deriving an identifier from the image or video itself.
5. A method comprising:
computing, using a processor on a handheld device, attributes of media used to identify the media;
providing, from the handheld device, the computed attributes of the media to a network resource, wherein the network resource uses the computed attributes of the media to identify the media or metadata associated with the media;
receiving, at the handheld device, metadata associated with the identified media in the network resource.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the metadata comprises audio.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein the metadata comprises at least one action.
8. The method of claim 5, wherein computing attributes comprises deriving identifying information from the media itself.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the identifying information serves as a statistically unique identifier of the media.
10. The method of claim 5, wherein the media comprises at least audio, video or imagery.
11. An apparatus comprising:
a memory configured to buffer data corresponding to media content obtained from a process in a handheld device, wherein the data represents audible portions of an audio signal; and
a processor configured to:
extract identifying information from the data;
identify the media content or identifying metadata associated with the media content using at least the extracted identifying information;
obtain metadata associated with the media content from a data resource; and
provide the metadata for output or display.
12. The system of claim 11, wherein the metadata comprises audio.
13. The system of claim 11, wherein the metadata comprises at least one action.
14. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon, the instructions comprising:
instructions to compute attributes of media used to identify the media;
instructions to provide the computed attributes of the media to a network resource, wherein the network resource uses the computed attributes of the media to identify the media, or to identify metadata associated with the media; and
instructions to receive metadata associated with the identified media in the network resource.
15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14, wherein the metadata comprises audio.
16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14, wherein the metadata comprises at least one action.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14, wherein the instructions to compute attributes comprise instructions to derive an identifier from the media itself.
18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14, wherein the media comprises at least audio, video or imagery.
19. An apparatus comprising:
a memory configured to buffer data corresponding to media content obtained from a process in a handheld device, wherein the data represents audible portions of an audio signal; and
a processor configured to:
extract identifying information from the data;
identify the media content or identifying metadata associated with the media content using at least the extracted identifying information;
obtain purchasing information associated with the media content from a data resource; and
provide the purchasing information for output or display.
20. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the processor is configured to extract identifying information from a filtered version of the data.
21. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the processor is configured to extract identifying information from the data using hashing.
22. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the identifying information comprises a dynamic identifier.
23. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the data comprises a compressed form.
Patent Citations (234)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3950782(A) | 1976-04-01 | Carey et al. | Applicant |
| US3984624(A) | 1976-10-01 | Waggener | Applicant |
| US4230990(A) | 1980-10-01 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US4313197(A) | 1982-01-01 | Maxemchuk | Applicant |
| US4450531(A) | 1984-05-01 | Kenyon et al. | Applicant |
| US4639779(A) | 1987-01-01 | Greenberg | Applicant |
| US4677466(A) | 1987-06-01 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US4697209(A) | 1987-09-01 | Kiewit et al. | Applicant |
| US4739398(A) | 1988-04-01 | Thomas et al. | Applicant |
| US4796292(A) | 1989-01-01 | Thomas | Applicant |
| US4805020(A) | 1989-02-01 | Greenberg | Applicant |
| US4807031(A) | 1989-02-01 | Broughton et al. | Applicant |
| US4858000(A) | 1989-08-01 | Lu | Applicant |
| US4907264(A) | 1990-03-01 | Seiler et al. | Applicant |
| US4931871(A) | 1990-06-01 | Kramer | Applicant |
| US4945412(A) | 1990-07-01 | Kramer | Applicant |
| US4967273(A) | 1990-10-01 | Greenberg | Applicant |
| US4969041(A) | 1990-11-01 | O'Grady et al. | Applicant |
| US4972471(A) | 1990-11-01 | Gross et al. | Applicant |
| US5019899(A) | 1991-05-01 | Boles et al. | Applicant |
| US5031228(A) | 1991-07-01 | Lu | Applicant |
| US5077608(A) | 1991-12-01 | Dubner | Applicant |
| US5115326(A) | 1992-05-01 | Burgess et al. | Applicant |
| US5315098(A) | 1994-05-01 | Tow | Applicant |
| US5319735(A) | 1994-06-01 | Preuss et al. | Applicant |
| US5331547(A) | 1994-07-01 | Laszlo | Applicant |
| US5398336(A) | 1995-03-01 | Tantry et al. | Applicant |
| US5420943(A) | 1995-05-01 | Mak | Applicant |
| US5436653(A) | 1995-07-01 | Ellis et al. | Applicant |
| US5481294(A) | 1996-01-01 | Thomas et al. | Applicant |
| US5486686(A) | 1996-01-01 | Zdybel, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5572653(A) | 1996-11-01 | DeTemple et al. | Applicant |
| US5574519(A) | 1996-11-01 | Manico et al. | Applicant |
| US5574962(A) | 1996-11-01 | Fardeau et al. | Applicant |
| US5579124(A) | 1996-11-01 | Aijala et al. | Applicant |
| US5581800(A) | 1996-12-01 | Fardeau et al. | Applicant |
| US5584070(A) | 1996-12-01 | Harris et al. | Applicant |
| US5606668(A) | 1997-02-01 | Shwed | Applicant |
| US5640193(A) | 1997-06-01 | Wellner | Applicant |
| US5671282(A) | 1997-09-01 | Wolff et al. | Applicant |
| US5708478(A) | 1998-01-01 | Tognazzini | Applicant |
| US5710834(A) | 1998-01-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US5737025(A) | 1998-04-01 | Dougherty et al. | Applicant |
| US5740244(A) | 1998-04-01 | Indeck et al. | Applicant |
| US5751854(A) | 1998-05-01 | Saitoh et al. | Applicant |
| US5754981(A) | 1998-05-01 | Veeneman et al. | Applicant |
| US5781914(A) | 1998-07-01 | Stork et al. | Applicant |
| US5809160(A) | 1998-09-01 | Powell et al. | Applicant |
| US5822432(A) | 1998-10-01 | Moskowitz et al. | Applicant |
| US5822436(A) | 1998-10-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US5832119(A) | 1998-11-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US5838458(A) | 1998-11-01 | Tsai | Applicant |
| US5841886(A) | 1998-11-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US5841978(A) | 1998-11-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US5842162(A) | 1998-11-01 | Fineberg | Applicant |
| US5848413(A) | 1998-12-01 | Wolff | Applicant |
| US5862260(A) | 1999-01-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US5901224(A) | 1999-05-01 | Hecht | Applicant |
| US5905248(A) | 1999-05-01 | Russell et al. | Applicant |
| US5918223(A) | 1999-06-01 | Blum et al. | Applicant |
| US5932863(A) | 1999-08-01 | Rathus et al. | Applicant |
| US5937000(A) | 1999-08-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US5938727(A) | 1999-08-01 | Ikeda | Applicant |
| US5978773(A) | 1999-11-01 | Hudetz et al. | Applicant |
| US5978791(A) | 1999-11-01 | Farber et al. | Applicant |
| US5982956(A) | 1999-11-01 | Lahmi | Applicant |
| US5986651(A) | 1999-11-01 | Reber et al. | Applicant |
| US5988897(A) | 1999-11-01 | Pierce et al. | Applicant |
| US5991500(A) | 1999-11-01 | Kanota et al. | Applicant |
| US5991737(A) | 1999-11-01 | Chen | Applicant |
| US5995105(A) | 1999-11-01 | Reber et al. | Applicant |
| US6002443(A) | 1999-12-01 | Iggulden | Applicant |
| US6064737(A) | 2000-05-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6076734(A) | 2000-06-01 | Dougherty et al. | Applicant |
| US6081827(A) | 2000-06-01 | Reber et al. | Applicant |
| US6088455(A) | 2000-07-01 | Logan et al. | Applicant |
| US6121530(A) | 2000-09-01 | Sonoda | Applicant |
| US6122403(A) | 2000-09-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6181817(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Zabih et al. | Applicant |
| US6185316(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Buffam | Applicant |
| US6188010(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Iwamura | Applicant |
| US6199048(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Hudetz et al. | Applicant |
| US6278781(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6282362(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Murphy et al. | Applicant |
| US6286036(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6304523(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US6311214(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6317881(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Shah-Nazaroff et al. | Applicant |
| US6324573(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6389055(B1) | 2002-05-01 | August et al. | Applicant |
| US6408331(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6415280(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Farber et al. | Applicant |
| US6433946(B2) | 2002-08-01 | Ogino | Applicant |
| US6442285(B2) | 2002-08-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US6466670(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Tsuria et al. | Applicant |
| US6505160(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Levy et al. | Applicant |
| US6522769(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US6522770(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Seder et al. | Applicant |
| US6523175(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Chan | Applicant |
| US6539095(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6542927(B2) | 2003-04-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6546112(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6553129(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6560349(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6587821(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6590998(B2) | 2003-07-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6611607(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US6647130(B2) | 2003-11-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6650761(B1) | 2003-11-01 | Rodriguez et al. | Applicant |
| US6664976(B2) | 2003-12-01 | Lofgren et al. | Applicant |
| US6674993(B1) | 2004-01-01 | Tarbouriech | Applicant |
| US6675146(B2) | 2004-01-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6681028(B2) | 2004-01-01 | Rodriguez et al. | Applicant |
| US6681029(B1) | 2004-01-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6694042(B2) | 2004-02-01 | Seder et al. | Applicant |
| US6694043(B2) | 2004-02-01 | Seder et al. | Applicant |
| US6697948(B1) | 2004-02-01 | Rabin et al. | Applicant |
| US6728390(B2) | 2004-04-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US6748360(B2) | 2004-06-01 | Pitman et al. | Applicant |
| US6748533(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Wu et al. | Applicant |
| US6768980(B1) | 2004-07-01 | Meyer et al. | Applicant |
| US6771885(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Agnihotri et al. | Applicant |
| US6772124(B2) | 2004-08-01 | Hoffberg et al. | Applicant |
| US6775392(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6782115(B2) | 2004-08-01 | Decker et al. | Applicant |
| US6804376(B2) | 2004-10-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US6804379(B2) | 2004-10-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6829368(B2) | 2004-12-01 | Meyer et al. | Applicant |
| US6834308(B1) | 2004-12-01 | Ikezoye et al. | Applicant |
| US6850252(B1) | 2005-02-01 | Hoffberg | Applicant |
| US6850626(B2) | 2005-02-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US6856977(B1) | 2005-02-01 | Adelsbach et al. | Applicant |
| US6869023(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Hawes | Applicant |
| US6917691(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Evans et al. | Applicant |
| US6917724(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Seder et al. | Applicant |
| US6931451(B1) | 2005-08-01 | Logan et al. | Applicant |
| US6941275(B1) | 2005-09-01 | Swierczek | Applicant |
| US6965682(B1) | 2005-11-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US6965873(B1) | 2005-11-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6968337(B2) | 2005-11-01 | Wold | Applicant |
| US6973669(B2) | 2005-12-01 | Daniels | Applicant |
| US6985600(B2) | 2006-01-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US6987862(B2) | 2006-01-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6990453(B2) | 2006-01-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US7010144(B1) | 2006-03-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US7024016(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US7035427(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7044395(B1) | 2006-05-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US7047413(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Yacobi et al. | Applicant |
| US7050603(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US7051086(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US7058697(B2) | 2006-06-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7076084(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US7095871(B2) | 2006-08-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7127744(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Levy | Applicant |
| US7136502(B2) | 2006-11-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US7164413(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US7171018(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US7174031(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US7174293(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Kenyon et al. | Applicant |
| US7185201(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US7190971(B1) | 2007-03-01 | Kawamoto | Applicant |
| US7194752(B1) | 2007-03-01 | Kenyon et al. | Applicant |
| US7209571(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US7224995(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7248715(B2) | 2007-07-01 | Levy | Applicant |
| US7261612(B1) | 2007-08-01 | Hannigan et al. | Applicant |
| US7289643(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Brunk et al. | Applicant |
| US7302574(B2) | 2007-11-01 | Conwell et al. | Applicant |
| US7333957(B2) | 2008-02-01 | Levy et al. | Applicant |
| US7349552(B2) | 2008-03-01 | Levy et al. | Applicant |
| US7359528(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7362781(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7362879(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Evans et al. | Applicant |
| US7369676(B2) | 2008-05-01 | Hein, III | Applicant |
| US7372976(B2) | 2008-05-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US7377421(B2) | 2008-05-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7437430(B2) | 2008-10-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7450734(B2) | 2008-11-01 | Rodriguez et al. | Applicant |
| US7461136(B2) | 2008-12-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7505605(B2) | 2009-03-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US7545951(B2) | 2009-06-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US7562392(B1) | 2009-07-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US7562393(B2) | 2009-07-01 | Buddhikot et al. | Applicant |
| US7565294(B2) | 2009-07-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7587602(B2) | 2009-09-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7590259(B2) | 2009-09-01 | Levy et al. | Applicant |
| US7593576(B2) | 2009-09-01 | Meyer et al. | Applicant |
| US7602978(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Levy et al. | Applicant |
| US7650009(B2) | 2010-01-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7650010(B2) | 2010-01-01 | Levy et al. | Applicant |
| US7711564(B2) | 2010-05-01 | Levy et al. | Applicant |
| US7715446(B2) | 2010-05-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7756892(B2) | 2010-07-01 | Levy | Applicant |
| US7760905(B2) | 2010-07-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US7805500(B2) | 2010-09-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US7837094(B2) | 2010-11-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2001/0044744(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2001/0053234(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2002/0032698(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Cox | Applicant |
| US2002/0178410(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Haitsma et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0174861(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Levy et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0043018(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Kawamoto | Applicant |
| US2007/0100757(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2007/0174059(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0185840(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2007/0195987(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2007/0250194(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0250716(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0028223(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2008/0133416(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2008/0133556(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Conwell et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0140573(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Levy et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0319859(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2009/0177742(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0008586(A1) | 2010-01-01 | Meyer et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0036881(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0046744(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0138012(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2010/0150395(A1) | 2010-06-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0185306(A1) | 2010-07-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2010/0322035(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| EP493091(A1) | 1992-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EP581317(A2) | 1994-02-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1199878(A2) | 2002-04-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1049320(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1019868(B1) | 2009-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2005-51793(A) | 2005-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO96/36163(A2) | 1996-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO97/43736(A1) | 1997-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO98/03923(A1) | 1998-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/72030(A2) | 2001-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/75794(A2) | 2001-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2/082271(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (54)
- Aust, D., “Augmenting Paper Documents with Digital Information in a Mobile Environment,” MS Thesis, University of Dortmund, Department of Computer Graphics, Sep. 3, 1996.Applicant
- Anonymous, Internet-On-A-Disk #7, Dec. 3, 1994.Applicant
- Anonymous, NL-KR Digest, Oct. 3, 1988.Applicant
- Arai et al, “Retrieving Electronic Documents with Real-World Objects on InteractiveDESK,” UIST '95, Nov. 14, 1995.Applicant
- Arai, InteractiveDESK: A Computer-Augmented Desk Which Responds to Operations on Real Objects, CHI 95, May 7, 1995.Applicant
- Bender et al., “Techniques for data hiding,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 2420, pp. 164-173, 1995.Applicant
- T. Berners-Lee, L. Masinter, M. McCahill, Uniform Resource Locators (URL), Network Working Group, Request for Comments 1738, Dec. 1994.Applicant
- T. Berners-Lee, The Original HTTP as defined in 1991.Applicant
- Aug. 29, 2008 Amendment; Jul. 3, 2008 Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination; Oct. 16, 2007 Determination—Reexamination Ordered; Jul. 26, 2007 “Request for Ex Party Reexamination”; all from U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,779 (Reexam of US Patent No. 6,199,048).Applicant
- Jun. 6, 2008 Notice of Allowance; May 3, 2007 Appeal Brief; Aug. 4, 2006 final Office Action; Jun. 15, 2006 Amendment; Feb. 5, 2006 Office Action; Jan. 24, 2006 Amendment; Jul. 13, 2005 final Office Action; all from assignee's U.S. Appl. No. 10/090,775 (issued as 7,437,430).Applicant
- Digimarc, “Frequently Asked Questions About Digimarc Signature Technology,” Aug. 1995.Applicant
- Foote, “An Overview of Audio Information Retrieval,” Multimedia Systems, v.7 n.1, p. 2-10, Jan. 1999.Applicant
- Hartung et al., Digital Watermarking of Raw and Compressed Video, Proc. SPIE 2952, Digital Compression Technologies and Systems for Video Communications, Oct. 1996, pp. 205-213.Applicant
- B. Ibrahim, “World-Wide Algorithm Animation”, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, North Holland Publishing, Nov. 1994.Applicant
- Namba, S. et al., “A Program Identification Code Transmission System Using Low-Frequency Audio Signals,” NHK Laboratories Note, Ser. No. 314, Mar. 1985.Applicant
- Lin, et al., “Generating Robust Digital Signature for Image/Video Authentication,” Proc. Multimedia and Security workshop at ACM MULTIMEDIA'98, Sep. 1, 1998, pp. 49-54.Applicant
- Worring, “Hyperdocument Generation Using OCR and Icon Detection,” Proc. 3d Int. Conf. on Doc. Analysis and Recognition, Aug. 14, 1995.Applicant
- Ghias et al, Query by Humming: Musical Information Retrieval in an Audio Database. In ACM Multimedia, pp. 231-236, Nov. 1995.Applicant
- Kageyama et al, Melody Retrieval with Humming, Proceedings of Int. Computer Music Conference (ICMC), 1993.Applicant
- Koch et al, “Copyright Protection for Multimedia Data,” Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Digital Media and Electronic Publishing, Leeds, U.K., 15 pages, Dec. 1994.Applicant
- Matsutani, “The Construction of Copyright-Protected Image Data Technical Report of IEICE,” ISEC94-58, pp. 59-68, 1995.Applicant
- Muscle Fish press release, Muscle Fish's Audio Search Technology to be Encapsulated into Informix Datablade Module, Jul. 10, 1996.Applicant
- P. Mockapetris, Domain Names—Concepts and Facilities, Network Working Group, Request for Comments 1034, Nov. 1987.Applicant
- P. Mockapetris, Domain Names—Implementation and Specification, Network Working Group, Request for Comments 1034, Nov. 1987.Applicant
- Wagner, “Fingerprinting,” 1983 IEEE, pp. 18-22.Applicant
- Wold et al, Content-Based Classification, Search, and Retrieval of Audio, IEEE Multimedia Magazine, Fall, 1996.Applicant
- Zhao, “A WWW Service to Embed and Prove Digital Copyright Watermarks,” Proc. of the European Conference on Multimedia Applications, Services and Techniques, May 1996, 15 pages.Applicant
- Zhao, et al., “Embedding Robust Labels into Images for Copyright Protection,” Proceedings of International Congress on Intellectual Property Rights for Specialized Information, Knowledge and New Technology, Aug. 21, 1995.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 60/000,442, filed Jun. 20, 1995 (Hudetz).Applicant
- Steele, R. et al., “Embedding Data in Speech using Scrambling Techniques,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. 3, May 1982.Applicant
- Steele, R. et al., “Simultaneous Transmission of Speech and Data Using Code-Breaking Techniques,” The Bell System Tech. Jour., vol. 60, No. 9, pp. 2081-2105, Nov. 1981.Applicant
- ten Kate, et al., “Digital Audio Carrying Extra Information,” Philips Research Labs, pp. 1097-1100, IEEE 1990.Applicant
- P.C.J. Hill, “Simultaneous Subliminal Signalling in Conventional Sound Circuits,” BBC Engineering, No. 90, pp. 14-31, 1972.Applicant
- Komatsu, N., “Information Security for Facsimile Communication,” Journal of the Institute of Image Electronics Engineers of Japan, 1990, vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 229-235.Applicant
- Hara et al., “An Improved Method of Embedding Data Into Pictures by Modulo Masking,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, 1988 vol. COM-36, No. 3, pp. 315-331.Applicant
- Xydeas et al., “Embedding Data Into Pictures by Modulo Masking,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, 1984, vol. COM-32, No. 1, pp. 56-69.Applicant
- Matsui et al., “Video-Steganography: How to Secretly Embed a Signature in a Picture,” IMA Intellectual Property Project Proceedings, Jan. 1994, vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 187-205.Applicant
- Tanaka et al., “A Visual Retrieval System with Private Information for Image Database,” International Conference on DSP Applications and Technology, Oct. 1991, pp. 415-421.Applicant
- Pitas et al., “Applying Signatures on Digital Images,” IEEE Workshop on Nonlinear Image and Signal Processing, Neos Marmaras, Greece, pp. 460-463, Jun. 1995.Applicant
- Szepanski, “A Signal Theoretic Method for Creating Forgery-Proof Documents for Automatic Verification,” in Proceedings of the 1979 Carnahan Conference on Crime Countermeasures, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, May 16-18, 1979, pp. 101-109.Applicant
- Itoh, et al., “A Method of Concealed Image for Bi-Level Image,” Technical Research Report of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineering, Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineering, Japan, vol. 90, No. 152, Aug. 1990, pp. 83-86.Applicant
- May 26, 2006 Response; Nov. 18, 2005 Communication from the European Patent Office; and Sep. 18, 2000 Supplementary Partial European Search Report; all from Assignee's European Patent Application No. 97 924 752.5 (published as EP1019868).Applicant
- Highwater FBI Ltd., “FBI Presentation: Image Copyright Protection Software,” Jul. 1995.Applicant
- Sep. 28, 2001 Examination Report from the European Patent Office; Feb. 6, 2002 Response thereto; May 9, 2000 European Search Report; and claims as originally filed, each from assignee's European patent application No. 00116604.0 (now issued as EP 1049320 B1).Applicant
- Sep. 18, 2000 Communication (Search Report) from the European Patent Office in Assignee's European Patent Application No. 97 924 752.5 (published as EP1019868).Applicant
- Nov. 18, 2005 Communication from the European Patent Office in Assignee's European Patent Application No. 97 924 752.5 (published as EP1019868).Applicant
- Jun. 1, 2007 Summons to attend oral proceedings from the European Patent Office in Assignee's European Patent Application No. 97 924 752.5 (published as EP1019868), and Assignee's Dec. 20, 2007 Response thereto.Applicant
- Allowed Claims from assignee's Japanese patent application No. 2004-224727 (published as JP 3949679); and Mar. 24, 2006 Notice of Reason(s) for Rejection (English Translation) in the JP 2004-224727 application.Applicant
- Mar. 31, 2008 Notice of Allowance (including Examiner's search history), and Feb. 21, 2008 Amendment, each from assignee's U.S. Appl. No. 11/265,544 (published as US 2006-0136565 A1).Applicant
- Sep. 28, 2001 Examination Report from EPO; Feb. 6, 2002 Response thereto; May 9, 2000 European Search Report; and claims as originally filed, all from assignee's European application No. 00116604.0 (now EP 1049320 B1).Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/337,590, filed Jun. 21, 1999, Geoffrey B. Rhoads.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,534, filed Jan. 26, 2000, Bruce L. Davis, et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/574,726, filed May 18, 2000, Geoffrey B. Rhoads.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/515,826, filed Feb. 29, 2000, Geoffrey B. Rhoads et al.Applicant