US 8,180,909 B2Grant
Managed services platform
Issue Date:2012-05-15
•41 Claims
•8 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A managed services platform. An applications management server is provided for managing relationships with application service providers and others over a wide area network such as the Internet. The applications management server interfaces with a master database server and the servers of one or more application service providers, or other entities, to facilitate selection and deselection of applications, services, and capabilities that may be available for use by the information technology network of a company.
Metadata
Assignee
- zvelo, Inc.
Inventors
- Robert Charles Hartman
- John Elton Dietrich, II
- Jeffrey James Finn
- Rodney Dean Holm
Application Information
Application Number:US 11/869,552
Filing Date:2007-10-09
Priority Date:2001-01-19
Art Unit:2455
Classifications
IPC:
G06F15/16
Patent Drawings (8 sheets)
Description
[0001] This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/154,891, filed Jun. 16, 2005, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/766,469, filed Jan. 19, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,961,773, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates to software management systems and, more particularly, to systems and methods for selecting, ordering, installing, managing, updating, and if necessary, uninstalling software applications provided to an entity by one or more application service providers (ASPs) or other sources.
Background of the Invention
[0003] Recently, substantial attention has been directed to the field of software management tools. One reason for this is that many vendors or purveyors of software now distribute their products directly to customers via wide area networks such as the Internet. Such vendors often are referred to as “Application Service Providers” or “ASPs.” Generally, businesses use ASPs as a means for outsourcing information technology (IT) functions to specialists. Moreover, rather than purchasing expensive software, high-powered computers, high-end telecommunications equipment, and the like, companies often now choose to rent or lease applications from ASPs, and they often access or use selected applications through the Internet. While this model allows companies to achieve significant savings from a hardware and software purchasing and maintenance perspective, the model may introduce significant management issues, where for example, multiple ASPs provide applications to a single entity.
[0004] Accordingly, it is believed that businesses may find systems, methods, and applications for managing ASP relationships to be quite useful.
Summary of the Invention
[0005] In one particularly innovative aspect, the present invention is directed to systems and methods for enabling a company to manage its relationships with one or more ASPs, or other software sources. In one presently preferred embodiment, an applications management server may be deployed within a company and used to interface with a master database server and the servers of one or more ASPs. The interface preferably occurs via the Internet, thus enabling a personal computer, web computer, or other network appliance coupled to the management server to interact with the master database server and the servers of the ASPs.
[0006] For example, using a browser application provided on a personal computer, it is possible interact with the management server and query the master database server to identify those applications, services, and subscriptions that are available, as well as those which are currently being utilized within a company. Further, through the use of an appropriate graphic user interface (GUI) a user of the browser may add selected applications, functions, or capabilities to the company network, and the user may remove applications, functions, or capabilities that are no longer needed by the company. The result of these actions may be communicated, for example, through the Internet to the master database server, and the master database server may thereafter interact with any relevant ASP servers to enable or disable selected applications, functions, or features. In addition, the master database server may provide electronic messages to any personnel having responsibility for tasks necessary to carry out a transaction or complete an action.
[0007] Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide improved systems, methods, and applications for managing ASP relationships over a wide area network, such as the Internet.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0008] Various objects and advantages and a more complete understanding of the present invention are apparent and more readily appreciated by reference to the following Detailed Description and to the appended claims when taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings wherein:
[0009] FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a system for managing ASP and other relationships over a wide area network, such as the Internet, in accordance with a preferred form of the present invention;
[0010] FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating the components of a software subscription management module in accordance with a preferred form of the present invention;
[0011] FIG. 3 is an illustration of a graphic user interface (GUI) used in accordance with the present invention; and
[0012] FIGS. 4( a)-4(d) comprise a series of screen images that may be used by a GUI in accordance with the present invention.
Detailed Description
[0013] As shown in FIG. 1 , in one presently preferred form, a system 10 for managing ASP and other relationships over a wide area network 16, such as the Internet, may comprise an applications management server 12, a personal computer, web computer, or other network appliance 14, a wide area network 16, a master database server 18, and a plurality of ASP servers 20(a) and 20(b). The applications management server 12 and the master database server 18 may be implemented using standard PC compatible hardware including, for example, a 400 MHz CELERON® processor manufactured by Intel Corporation. However, in one presently preferred form, the master database server 18 comprises a 733 MHz PENTIUM® processor manufactured by Intel Corp., 512 MB of RAM (or other suitable memory), and AMI Megaraid SCSI RAID hardware configured to make three 9 G disks look like one 18 G disk in RAID5 mode. The applications management server 12 preferably comprises a 500 MHz CELERON® processor manufactured by Intel Corp., 64 MB of RAM (or other suitable memory), and a 10.2 GB hard disk drive.
[0014] The applications management server 12 and master database server 18 may be coupled to the Internet 16 via dial up, ISDN, DSL, or any other protocol that supports TCP/IP. The master database server 18 also may employ database management software available from any of a number of vendors including Microsoft Corp., Oracle Corp., and Sleepy Cat, Inc.
[0015] The applications management server 12 may be deployed within a company and used to interface with the master database server 18 and the servers of one or more ASPs 20(a) and 20(b). The interface preferably occurs via the Internet 16, thus enabling a personal computer, web computer, or other network appliance 14 coupled to the applications management server 12 to interact with the master database server 18 and the servers of the ASPs 20(a) and 20(b).
[0016] For example, using a browser application (not shown) provided on the personal computer 14, it is possible to interact with the applications management server 12 and query the master database server 18 to identify those applications, services, and subscriptions that are available, as well as those which are currently being utilized within a company. Further, through the use of an appropriate graphic user interface (GUI), a user of the browser (not shown) may add selected applications, functions, or capabilities to the company network, and the user may remove applications, functions, or capabilities that are no longer needed by the company. The result of these actions may be communicated, for example, through the Internet 16 to the master database server 18, and the master database server 18 may thereafter interact with any relevant ASP servers 20(a) and 20(b) to enable or disable selected applications, functions, or capabilities. In addition, the master database server 18 may provide electronic messages to any personnel 22 having responsibility for tasks necessary to carry out a transaction or complete an action.
[0017] In one presently preferred embodiment, a software subscription management module 50, shown in FIG. 2 , will be configured on the applications management server 12, and the software subscription management module 50 may comprise a graphic user interface (GUI) submodule 52 and a backend support submodule 54. As will be described in more detail below, using a typical browser application, such as Microsoft Explorer® or Netscape Navigator®, the user (not shown) of the personal computer 14 may access the GUI submodule 52 provided on the applications management server 12, and by interfacing with the GUI, may view a list of applications, services, or capabilities that are provided on a network (not shown) of a company, as well as, a list of applications, services, or capabilities that are available for use by the network. The user also may access historical data relevant to the network using the GUI.
[0018] In a preferred form, all queries issued by the applications management server 12 are in the form of hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) requests and include a unique ID for the management applications server as part of a Uniform Resource Locator (URL). Those skilled in the art will appreciate, however, that other communications protocols, such as file transfer protocol (FTP) or hypertext transfer protocol secure (HTTPS), also may be used for queries issued by the applications management server 12.
[0019] Turning now to a description of the GUI, the GUI 100, shown in FIG. 3 , preferably includes a subscription management item 102 and, if desired, a subscriptions history item 104. The subscription management item 102 may be used to retrieve a display of all applications, services, and capabilities that are available to the network, together with a plurality of “subscribe” and “unsubscribe” buttons 106(a) and (b) for enabling a user to select one or more offerings for use by the system. The subscriptions history item 104 may be used to display, for example, a chronological history of those offerings that have been utilized by the network in the past.
[0020] Using the GUI 100, a system administrator 14 can retrieve a list 107 of available applications or services, and using the displayed list, the administrator 14 can select desired items to be installed on the applications management server 12, or other servers (not shown), within a local area network (LAN) or wide area network (WAN). The administrator also may view a history of all applications or services that have been selected for use within network over a prescribed period of time.
[0021] Preferably, the GUI 100 issues back-end commands that will cause any necessary HTTP requests to be generated, and information returned from the applications management server 12 or the master database server 18 will be parsed, formatted, and sent to a standard output. The GUI 100 may then read in the output from the back-end process and display the information to the administrator 14 along with any necessary interactive items, such as the subscribe and unsubscribe buttons 108(a) and (b) described above.
[0022] Preferably, whenever a list 107 of available services or applications is presented to an administrator, the list 107 will include all available applications or services, and the administrator 14 will be allowed to select services or applications for subscription or cancellation. The history item 104 may be used to display a chronological history of selected services or applications.
[0023] Turning now to FIGS. 4( a)-(d), in accordance with another preferred form of the present invention the GUI 100 may include a series of screen images that include a field 111 denoting the number of application licenses 110 that may be required for a given enterprise and a list of services or applications 107 that are available to the enterprise. If it is desired to change the number of licenses required by the enterprise, a user of the system may simply click on a change button 112 to access, for example, a pulldown menu (not shown) offering different licensing levels. The user also may initiate a subscription sequence by clicking on a subscribe button 106(a) provided adjacent one of the application listings. Following initiation of the subscription sequence, the user may be presented with another screen 103, which includes a download now button 114 for initializing an application download sequence and an unsubscribe button 106(b) adjacent the selected application. If the user clicks on the download now button 114 an application download sequence will be initiated, and the user may be presented with a new screen 105 including an install now button 116. By clicking on the install now button, the user may cause the selected application to be installed on the applications management server 12 or, if desired, on another server (not shown) included within the users LAN. Lastly, one the selected application has been installed, the user may be presented with a screen 109 that includes a check icon 118 adjacent the service that has been selected and installed upon the user's network.
[0024] Table 1, below, provides an exemplary representation of the components comprising the subscriptions management item 102 (shown in FIG. 3 ), wherein “xxx” comprises the name of the service or application that will be subscribed to or unsubscribed from.
[0025]
| TABLE 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Form Field | Form Field | Appears in | |
| Name | Type | Corresponding ti.conf Variable | Form |
| subscribe_xxx | Submit button | SUBSCRIPTION_ADD_SERVICES | SnapIn.php |
| unsubscribe_xxx | Submit button | SUBSCRIPTION_ADD_SERVICES | SnapIn.php |
[0026] Turning now to a description of the backend support module 54 and related system programs, the backend support module 54 employs several scripts and routines described below to enable selection or deselection of services or applications in response to instructions received from the GUI 100.
[0027] In one preferred embodiment, a sysSubscriptionQuery routine, comprising a perl script, is used to create http queries for Peabody Software service APIs using inputs to the script and two ti.conf variables. A returned value from the query is sent to the standard output (not shown) of the GUI 100.
[0028] A sysSubscriptionQuery: System Calling routine passes an API name as a first parameter and, if necessary, a service identifier as a second parameter. Thus, the call does not require a service identifier. An exemplary call for a service listing may read as follows: /use/local/ti/bin/sysSubscriptionQuery GetServices. Whereas, a call to subscribe to a particular service requires an identification of the service to be subscribed to and may read as follows: /use/local/ti/bin/sysSubscriptionQuery Subscribe 100.
[0029] A sysSubscriptionQuery: System Operation routine enables the hostname of a server (not shown) to query and the path to an API script to be pulled from the ti.conf variable SUBSCRIPTION_QUERY_HOST_PATH. The API passed to this program is used as part of the name of the script to call on the server (not shown). The query to the script preferably comprises a DeviceKey, stored in SERIAL_NUMBER, and optionally a ServiceID, e.g., the name of the service to be subscribed to. Preferably, a HTTP::Request object is created with a GET method, and an LWP::UserAgent request is made using the HTTP::Request object. The response to the request is stored in a HTTP::Response object. If the request is successful the content of the response is sent to the standard output (not shown) of the GUI 100. Otherwise, an error is printed as a HTML document. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that in some circumstances the Response object may be parsed and formatted prior to being printed to the standard output (not shown).
[0030] In one preferred form, a SusUnsubscribe script uninstalls any RedHat Package Managers (RPMs) associated with a service being unsubscribed, and a SetServiceDisabled request is sent to the subscription server. In addition, a susUnsubscribe:System Calling script is called with the name of the service to unsubscribe. The script may read as follows: /use/local/ti/bin/sysUnsubscribe 100.
[0031] A susUnsubscribe:System Operation script may be used to check a repository directory in /usrlocal/redphish/snapin for a directory that matches a servicename. If there is no matching service name, then an error is reported, and the service is not unsubscribed. If the directory exists, a rpm-e command may be issued against each rpm in the directory. After the packages are uninstalled the directory and the files within are deleted.
[0032] A sysUpdateSubscriptions script may be used to check for a SUBSCRIPTION_ADD_SERVICES array in ti.conf and for each service listed may download the relevant files and install them on the applications management server 12.
[0033] To perform service installations, a sysUpdateSubscriptions: System Operation routine is preferably utilized. Thus, for each service listed in SUBSCRIPTION_ADD_SERVICES a GetServiceLocation query is made to the subscription server. The information returned from the server is used to transfer (via ftp) the RPMs to a Peabody system. Once all of the RPMs for a service have been downloaded they may be installed with the following command: rpm-U*.rpm. If any of the RPM packages fail to load, then none of them will be loaded. When a loading failure occurs, two additional loading attempts will be made to download and install the relevant files, before a given loading process will be abandoned, and installation of the next service will be initiated. If all the packages install then the service name will be removed from the SUBSCRIPTION_ADD_SERVICES array.
[0034] Table 2, below, sets forth a preferred set of data structures that may be used in accordance with the present invention.
[0035]
| TABLE 2 | |
|---|---|
| Statement format with default values (if any) and description | |
| STATEMENT=<arg1>m<arg2>m <arg3>,?,<argN> | |
| Where <arg1>is?. | |
| SUBSCRIPTION_QUERY_HOST_PATH=<URL> | |
| Where <URL> is the hostname and path to the script that process the | |
| queries. This is set the first time the subscription software is run. | |
| Default: blank | |
| SUBSCRIPTION_ID=<ID> | |
| Where <ID> is the numerical id of the machine. This is set when the | |
| subscription software is used for the first time. | |
| Defaults: blank | |
| SUBSCRIPTION_ADD_SERVICES=<service id> | |
| This array is used to store the services selected from the GUI that need to | |
| be installed during the next update. | |
| SUBSCRIPTION_INTERVAL=<number of days> | |
| The number of days between updates. | |
| Default: blank | |
[0036] In one presently preferred form, the backend support module utilizes a HTTP API for Software Subscriptions Management. Each API call preferably is in the form of a HTTP query with parameters passed as key-value pairs, and each response preferably is a list of key-value pairs in plain text form. The API call preferably has one of the two following formats:
http://<host>/<path>/<API>/.cgi?DeviceID=<DeviceID>[&ServiceID=<Number>
or
http://<host>/<path>/<GetServiceLocation.cgi?ServiceID=<Number>
[0037] where: <host> identifies the software subscription server, and the host's name is stored in SOFTWARE_UPDATE_HOST; <DeviceID> is a unique number identifying the machine and may be the serial number of, for example, the applications management server 12 or the MAC address of the Ethernet card of the server 12 that is coupled to the Internet; and <Number> is the numeric identifier of the requested service. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the <DEVICE_ID> also may be a series of numbers followed by a checksum, as would be the case with a typical InstaGate machine of the type that is well known in the art.
[0038] As an example, the request set forth below could represent a Subscribe request from a machine with an Ethernet hardware address of 00:A0:CC:69:55:B2 for service 1040—a tax software package. In the example, the subscription server is located at subscriptions.esoft.com, the scripts are in cgi.bin, and the software is located on blades.esoft.com in the directory /home/software/tax. In addition, the software is accessible with the password sn2gg13.
Request:
http://subscriptions.esoft.com/cgi-bin/Subscribe.cgi?DeviceID+00A0CC6955B2&ServiceID=1040
Result:
[0039] Result: 1
Request:
http://subscriptions.esoft.com/cgi-bin/GetServiceLocation?ServiceID=1040
[0040] Result:
[0041] Hostname:blades.esoft.com
[0042] Path:tax
[0043] Username:softname
[0044] Password:sn2gg13
[0045] As explained above, in a preferred form a GetServices request will retrieve a list of available services that can be subscribed to by a requesting machine, and it will indicate which services are already subscribed to. The parameters and return values used in accordance with a GetServices request may comprise those set forth in Tables 3(a) and 3(b), below.
[0046]
| TABLE 3(a) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| GetServices: Parameters | |||
| Name | Type | Description | |
| DeviceKey | Hex Number | Composed of the digits of | |
| the MAC address of eht1 | |||
[0047]
| TABLE 3(b) | ||
|---|---|---|
| GetServices: Return Values | ||
| Name | Type | Description |
| ServiceID | Number | a unique identifier for the service |
| ServiceTitle | String | a brief title for the service |
| ServiceDesc | String | a brief description of the service |
| ServiceFee | String | How much the service will cost. |
| Subscribed | Number | Boolean value - 1 for subscribed, 0 for not |
| subscribed | ||
| StartDate | mm/dd/yy | Date subscription started if already |
| subscribed. | ||
| Enabled | Number | Boolean value - 1 for enabled, 0 for |
| disabled | ||
| CoreService | Number | Boolean value - 1 indicates the service is a |
| core service. If Enabled is 0 for a core | ||
| service then disable the system. | ||
| Available | Number | Boolean value - 1 indicates the service is |
| available if it is a 0 then the installed service | ||
| must be disabled. This record is optional. | ||
[0048] The parameters and return values used with a Subscribe request are set forth in Tables 4(a) and 4(b), and the parameters and return values used within an Unsubscribe request are set forth in Tables 5(a) and 5(b), below.
[0049]
| TABLE 4(a) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Subscribe: Parameters | ||
| Name | Type | Description |
| DeviceKey | Hex Number | Composed of the digits of the MAC |
| address of eth1 | ||
| ServiceID | Number | A unique identifier for service |
[0050]
| TABLE 4(b) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Subscribe: Return Values | |||
| Name | Type | Description | |
| Result | Number | Boolean value - 1 if successfully | |
| subscribed, 0 otherwise | |||
[0051]
| TABLE 5(a) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Unsubscribe: Parameters | ||
| Name | Type | Description |
| DeviceKey | Hex Number | composed of the digits of the MAC |
| address of eth1 | ||
| ServiceID | Number | a unique identifier for the service |
[0052]
| TABLE 5(b) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Unsubscribe: Return Values | |||
| Name | Type | Description | |
| Result | Number | Boolean value - 1 successfully | |
| unsubscribed, 0 otherwise | |||
[0053] The parameters and return values used with a GetContactInfo request are set forth in Tables 6(a) and 6(b), below. However, when a subscription server is successfully contacted, “NextDay” and “Time” fields stored within the memory (not shown) of the subscriptions management server 12 preferably will dictate when to contact the server again. If the applications management server 12 fails to contact a server at a specified time, then the applications management server 12 preferably will attempt to establish contact three additional times over the course of the next fifteen minutes, e.g., once every 5 minutes. If all three retries fail, the device should give up and try again in the number of days specified in an “Interval” field, but at the same designated “Time”.
[0054]
| TABLE 6(a) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| GetContactInfro: Prameters | |||
| Name | Type | Description | |
| DeviceKey | Hex | Composed of the digits of the MAC | |
| Number | address of eth1 | ||
[0055]
| TABLE 6(b) | ||
|---|---|---|
| GetContactInfo: Return values | ||
| Name | Type | Description |
| NextDay | mm/dd/yyyy | The next day to contact the back office |
| Time | hh:ss | The time of day (in 24 hour time) to |
| query the back office | ||
| Interval | Number | The frequency in days to query the |
| back office | ||
| URLBase | String | The URL to be used for the next |
| update/verification. The URL | ||
| contains the protocol, host, and path | ||
| up to the beginning of the API portion. | ||
[0056] The parameters and return values used with a SetService Enabled request are set forth in Tables 7(a) and 7(b), below.
[0057]
| TABLE 7(a) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| SetServiceEnabled: Parameters | |||
| Name | Type | Description | |
| DeviceKey | Hex | Composed of the digits of the MAC | |
| Number | address of eth1 | ||
| ServiceID | Number | A unique identifier for the service | |
[0058]
| TABLE 7(b) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| SetServiceEnabled: Return Values | |||
| Name | Type | Description | |
| Result | Number | Boolean value 1 if set enabled | |
| successfully, 0 otherwise | |||
[0059] The parameters and return values used with a SetServiceDisabled request are set forth in Tables 8(a) and 8(b), below.
[0060]
| TABLE 8(a) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| SetServiceDisabled: Parameters | |||
| Name | Type | Description | |
| DeviceKey | Hex | composed of the digits of the MAC | |
| Number | address of eth1 | ||
| ServiceID | Number | a unique identifier for the service | |
[0061]
| TABLE 8(b) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| SetServiceDisabled: Return Values | |||
| Name | Type | Description | |
| Result | Number | Boolean value 1 if set disabled | |
| successfully, 0 otherwise | |||
[0062] The parameters and return values used with a GetServiceLocation request are set forth in Tables 9(a) and 9(b), below.
[0063]
| TABLE 9(a) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| GetServiceLocation: Parameters | |||
| Name | Type | Description | |
| ServiceID | Number | a unique identifier for the service | |
| DeviceKey | Hex | The unique identifier for the machine. | |
| Number | |||
[0064]
| TABLE 9(b) | ||
|---|---|---|
| GetServiceLocation: Return Value | ||
| Name | Type | Description |
| Hostname | String | Name identifier for the service |
| Path | String | Path from login directory to software |
| Username | String | Username to use to log in with |
| Password string | String | Password for the Username |
[0065] In another aspect, the GUI 100 (or system front end) may use the support files listed in Table 10(a), below, and the backend support module may use the support files listed in Table 10(b), below.
[0066]
| TABLE 10(a) | |
|---|---|
| /Path/Filename | Description |
| Ti/_Support/Snapin.php | This script displays the available service and its |
| current state. | |
[0067]
| TABLE 10(b) | |
|---|---|
| /Path/Filename | Description |
| /sysUnsubscribe | Script that unsubscribes to the specified service |
| sysSubscriptionQuery | Creates the URI for the query, issues the query |
| and sends the results back. | |
| SysUpdateSubscritions | Script that downloads and installs subscribed |
| software | |
[0068] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that, in addition to the systems and methodologies described herein, the present invention is directed to the computer software applications, programs, protocols, routines, and instructions (collectively “computer programming instructions”) that are used to implement the above-described features and functions. Computer programming instructions preferably are stored within memory of the system, and may be received or transmitted via a communications interface. When executed by a processor (not shown) of the applications management server 12 or database management server 18, the programming instructions will enable the system 10 to perform various methods and processes in accordance with the present invention and, therefore, represent controllers of the system 10 and, potentially, any ASP servers 20(a) and 20(b) that may be included within the system 10.
[0069] In this document, the term “computer program product” is used to refer to any media that may be used to provide programming instructions or data to the system 10, or to any server or processor within the system 10, through for example, the Internet. Examples of such media include any memory products used by or within the system 10, any storage drives or devices (whether fixed or removable) used by or within the system 10, and any signals that may be transmitted to, from, or within the system 10.
[0070] Because the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific examples thereof have been shown in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not to be limited to the particular forms or methods disclosed, but to the contrary, the invention should encompass all modifications, alternatives, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A system for managing software applications over a network, the system comprising:
at least one software application provider configured to deliver at least one software application to a client;
a subscription management server in communication with the at least one software application provider, the subscription management server configured to store an identifier for the at least one software application;
an application management server in communication with the subscription management server, wherein the application management server is positioned in the network as an intermediary between the subscription management server and the client, wherein the application management server is configured to request the subscription management server for an instruction to provide access to the at least one software application; and
a license management server in communication with the subscription management server, wherein the license management server is configured to make a determination based on client subscription criteria as to whether to provide the application management server access to the at least one software application.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider is an application service provider.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider is a server-based application service provider.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider is a vendor-based application service provider.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider resides on a network shared with the subscription management server.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider is an open-source organization.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider is an organization that distributes open source applications.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider is an open-source vendor.
9. The system of claim 7, wherein the organization provides the at least one software application without any modifications.
10. The system of claim 7, wherein the organization provides the at least one software application in combination with at least one additional software application.
11. The system of claim 7, wherein the at least one software application is modified, altered, supplemented or otherwise augmented by the organization.
12. The system of claim 7, wherein a single organization provides the subscription management server, the application management server, and the at least one software application.
13. The system of claim 12, wherein the single organization receives the at least one software application from a third party.
14. The system of claim 13, wherein the third party is an application service provider.
15. The system of claim 13, wherein the at least one software application is altered, modified, supplemented or otherwise augmented by the single organization.
16. The system of claim 1, wherein a plurality of organizations provide the subscription management server, the application management server, and the at least one software application.
17. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider is adapted to deliver a single application.
18. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider is adapted to deliver a plurality of software applications.
19. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider is an enterprise application services provider.
20. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider resides within a local area network.
21. The system of claim 20, wherein the local area network is an end-user computer network.
22. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one software application provider resides on a third party computer network.
23. The system of claim 1, wherein the software application is distributed via a wide area network.
24. The system of claim 23, wherein the wide area network is the world wide web.
25. The system of claim 23, wherein the wide area network is a wireless network.
26. The system of claim 23, wherein the wide area network is selected from the group consisting of a cable network, PCS/GSM, TDMA, CDMA, 3G, 802.xx, WLANS, WIFI, and WiMax.
27. The system of claim 1, wherein the software application is distributed via a local area network.
28. The system of claim 1, wherein the subscription management server and the application management server comprise one or more of a read only memory, a random access memory, a user interface, a central processing unit, a clock, an integrated circuit, and a communications port.
29. The system of claim 1, wherein the client is an end-user of the at least one software application.
30. The system of claim 1, wherein the client is the application management server.
31. The system of claim 1, wherein the client is the subscription management server.
32. The system of claim 30, wherein the application management server provides the at least one software application to an end-user of the software application.
33. A system for managing software application subscriptions over a network, the system comprising:
a plurality of software application sources, each configured to deliver at least one software application to a client;
a subscription management server in communication with the plurality of software application sources, the subscription management server configured to store an identifier for the at least one software application;
an application management server in communication with the subscription management server, wherein the application management server is positioned in the network as an intermediary between the subscription management server and the client, wherein the application management server is configured to request the subscription management server for an instruction to provide access to the at least one software application; and
a license management server in communication with the subscription management server, wherein the license management server is configured to make a determination based on client subscription criteria as to whether to provide the application management server access to the at least one software application.
34. The system of claim 33, wherein at least one of the plurality of software application sources is configured to deliver the at least one software application to the subscription management server.
35. The system of claim 33, wherein at least one of the plurality of software application sources is configured to deliver the at least one software application to the application management server.
36. The system of claim 33, wherein at least one of the plurality of software application sources is configured to deliver the at least one software application to the subscription management server and the application management server.
37. The system of claim 33, wherein the at least one software application is altered, modified, supplemented, or otherwise augmented prior to providing the application management server access to the at least one software application.
38. The system of claim 33, wherein the client is an end-user of the at least one software application.
39. The system of claim 33, wherein the client is the application management server.
40. The system of claim 33, wherein the client is the subscription management server.
41. The system of claim 39, wherein the application management server provides the at least one software application to an end-user of the software application.
Patent Citations (174)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4791565(A) | 1988-12-01 | Dunham et al. | Applicant |
| US4815030(A) | 1989-03-01 | Cross et al. | Applicant |
| US4937863(A) | 1990-06-01 | Robert et al. | Applicant |
| US4992940(A) | 1991-02-01 | Dworkin | Applicant |
| US5023907(A) | 1991-06-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US5138712(A) | 1992-08-01 | Corbin | Applicant |
| US5155809(A) | 1992-10-01 | Baker et al. | Applicant |
| US5204897(A) | 1993-04-01 | Wyman | Applicant |
| US5283868(A) | 1994-02-01 | Baker et al. | Applicant |
| US5329619(A) | 1994-07-01 | Page et al. | Applicant |
| US5341477(A) | 1994-08-01 | Pitkin et al. | Applicant |
| US5371532(A) | 1994-12-01 | Gelman et al. | Applicant |
| US5375206(A) | 1994-12-01 | Hunter et al. | Applicant |
| US5388215(A) | 1995-02-01 | Baker et al. | Applicant |
| US5410703(A) | 1995-04-01 | Nilsson et al. | Applicant |
| US5423003(A) | 1995-06-01 | Berteau | Applicant |
| US5438508(A) | 1995-08-01 | Wyman | Applicant |
| US5440744(A) | 1995-08-01 | Jacobson et al. | Applicant |
| US5442771(A) | 1995-08-01 | Filepp et al. | Applicant |
| US5522041(A) | 1996-05-01 | Murakami et al. | Applicant |
| US5539822(A) | 1996-07-01 | Lett | Examiner |
| US5548722(A) | 1996-08-01 | Jalalian et al. | Applicant |
| US5553241(A) | 1996-09-01 | Shirakihara | Applicant |
| US5557747(A) | 1996-09-01 | Rogers et al. | Applicant |
| US5579222(A) | 1996-11-01 | Bains et al. | Applicant |
| US5581764(A) | 1996-12-01 | Fitzgerald et al. | Applicant |
| US5602991(A) | 1997-02-01 | Berteau | Applicant |
| US5642515(A) | 1997-06-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US5644718(A) | 1997-07-01 | Belove et al. | Applicant |
| US5668950(A) | 1997-09-01 | Kikuchi et al. | Applicant |
| US5671412(A) | 1997-09-01 | Christiano | Applicant |
| US5671414(A) | 1997-09-01 | Nicolet | Applicant |
| US5678007(A) | 1997-10-01 | Hurvig | Applicant |
| US5680548(A) | 1997-10-01 | Trugman | Applicant |
| US5680549(A) | 1997-10-01 | Raynak et al. | Applicant |
| US5692129(A) | 1997-11-01 | Sonderegger et al. | Applicant |
| US5694546(A) | 1997-12-01 | Reisman | Applicant |
| US5694550(A) | 1997-12-01 | Takeda et al. | Applicant |
| US5699526(A) | 1997-12-01 | Siefert | Applicant |
| US5706437(A) | 1998-01-01 | Kirchner et al. | Applicant |
| US5708960(A) | 1998-01-01 | Kamisaka et al. | Examiner |
| US5724525(A) | 1998-03-01 | Beyers et al. | Examiner |
| US5729682(A) | 1998-03-01 | Marquis et al. | Applicant |
| US5732219(A) | 1998-03-01 | Blumer et al. | Applicant |
| US5748493(A) | 1998-05-01 | Lighfoot et al. | Applicant |
| US5748897(A) | 1998-05-01 | Katiyar | Applicant |
| US5757925(A) | 1998-05-01 | Faybishenko | Applicant |
| US5758068(A) | 1998-05-01 | Brandt et al. | Applicant |
| US5761499(A) | 1998-06-01 | Sonderegger | Applicant |
| US5761662(A) | 1998-06-01 | Dasan | Applicant |
| US5764914(A) | 1998-06-01 | Goto et al. | Applicant |
| US5774668(A) | 1998-06-01 | Choquier et al. | Applicant |
| US5809237(A) | 1998-09-01 | Watts et al. | Applicant |
| US5809287(A) | 1998-09-01 | Stupek et al. | Applicant |
| US5815665(A) | 1998-09-01 | Teper et al. | Applicant |
| US5826027(A) | 1998-10-01 | Pedersen et al. | Applicant |
| US5832219(A) | 1998-11-01 | Pettus | Applicant |
| US5838911(A) | 1998-11-01 | Rosenhauer et al. | Applicant |
| US5845077(A) | 1998-12-01 | Fawcett | Applicant |
| US5859978(A) | 1999-01-01 | Sonderegger et al. | Applicant |
| US5859979(A) | 1999-01-01 | Tung et al. | Applicant |
| US5862339(A) | 1999-01-01 | Bonnaure et al. | Applicant |
| US5867661(A) | 1999-02-01 | Bittinger et al. | Applicant |
| US5881144(A) | 1999-03-01 | Havens | Applicant |
| US5884039(A) | 1999-03-01 | Ludwig et al. | Applicant |
| US5886991(A) | 1999-03-01 | Guarneri et al. | Applicant |
| US5905860(A) | 1999-05-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US5918213(A) | 1999-06-01 | Bernard et al. | Applicant |
| US5919247(A) | 1999-07-01 | Van Hoff et al. | Applicant |
| US5925127(A) | 1999-07-01 | Ahmad | Applicant |
| US5930357(A) | 1999-07-01 | Fukui | Applicant |
| US5933646(A) | 1999-08-01 | Hendrickson et al. | Applicant |
| US5937162(A) | 1999-08-01 | Funk et al. | Applicant |
| US5940074(A) | 1999-08-01 | Britt et al. | Applicant |
| US5940504(A) | 1999-08-01 | Griswold et al. | Applicant |
| US5941949(A) | 1999-08-01 | Pedersen | Applicant |
| US5949975(A) | 1999-09-01 | Batty et al. | Applicant |
| US5956485(A) | 1999-09-01 | Perlman | Applicant |
| US5956490(A) | 1999-09-01 | Buchholz et al. | Applicant |
| US5961586(A) | 1999-10-01 | Pedersen | Applicant |
| US5978848(A) | 1999-11-01 | Maddalozzo, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5991402(A) | 1999-11-01 | Jia et al. | Applicant |
| US5995965(A) | 1999-11-01 | Experton | Applicant |
| US5999740(A) | 1999-12-01 | Rowley | Applicant |
| US6006332(A) | 1999-12-01 | Rabne et al. | Applicant |
| US6009274(A) | 1999-12-01 | Fletcher et al. | Applicant |
| US6009469(A) | 1999-12-01 | Mattaway et al. | Applicant |
| US6012100(A) | 2000-01-01 | Frailong et al. | Applicant |
| US6029201(A) | 2000-02-01 | Neill | Applicant |
| US6035423(A) | 2000-03-01 | Hodges et al. | Applicant |
| US6038595(A) | 2000-03-01 | Ortony | Applicant |
| US6044403(A) | 2000-03-01 | Gerszberg et al. | Applicant |
| US6047323(A) | 2000-04-01 | Krause | Applicant |
| US6047376(A) | 2000-04-01 | Hosoe | Applicant |
| US6049670(A) | 2000-04-01 | Okada et al. | Applicant |
| US6049671(A) | 2000-04-01 | Slivka et al. | Applicant |
| US6049789(A) | 2000-04-01 | Frison et al. | Applicant |
| US6052711(A) | 2000-04-01 | Gish | Applicant |
| US6052725(A) | 2000-04-01 | McCann et al. | Applicant |
| US6058425(A) | 2000-05-01 | White | Applicant |
| US6058426(A) | 2000-05-01 | Godwin et al. | Applicant |
| US6073214(A) | 2000-06-01 | Fawcett | Applicant |
| US6078931(A) | 2000-06-01 | Motoyama | Applicant |
| US6088451(A) | 2000-07-01 | He et al. | Applicant |
| US6088717(A) | 2000-07-01 | Reed et al. | Applicant |
| US6101527(A) | 2000-08-01 | Lejeune et al. | Applicant |
| US6101542(A) | 2000-08-01 | Miyamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US6105063(A) | 2000-08-01 | Hayes, Jr. | Applicant |
| US6105066(A) | 2000-08-01 | Hayes, Jr. | Applicant |
| US6108712(A) | 2000-08-01 | Hayes et al. | Applicant |
| US6115743(A) | 2000-09-01 | Cowan et al. | Applicant |
| US6119162(A) | 2000-09-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US6119163(A) | 2000-09-01 | Monteiro | Applicant |
| US6128644(A) | 2000-10-01 | Nozaki | Applicant |
| US6128776(A) | 2000-10-01 | Kang | Applicant |
| US6131121(A) | 2000-10-01 | Mattaway | Applicant |
| US6134591(A) | 2000-10-01 | Nickles | Applicant |
| US6134593(A) | 2000-10-01 | Alexander et al. | Applicant |
| US6138160(A) | 2000-10-01 | Boies et al. | Applicant |
| US6141759(A) | 2000-10-01 | Braddy | Applicant |
| US6144960(A) | 2000-11-01 | Okada et al. | Applicant |
| US6151643(A) | 2000-11-01 | Cheng et al. | Applicant |
| US6154781(A) | 2000-11-01 | Bolam et al. | Applicant |
| US6157944(A) | 2000-12-01 | Pedersen | Applicant |
| US6161137(A) | 2000-12-01 | Ogdon et al. | Applicant |
| US6167449(A) | 2000-12-01 | Arnold et al. | Applicant |
| US6173316(B1) | 2001-01-01 | De Boor et al. | Applicant |
| US6223291(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Puhl et al. | Examiner |
| US6256668(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Slivka et al. | Applicant |
| US6269456(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Hodges et al. | Applicant |
| US6272536(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Van Hoff et al. | Applicant |
| US6282709(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Reha et al. | Applicant |
| US6282711(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Halpern et al. | Applicant |
| US6292889(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Fitzgerald et al. | Applicant |
| US6327617(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Fawcett | Applicant |
| US6339826(B2) | 2002-01-01 | Hayes et al. | Applicant |
| US6405266(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Bass et al. | Applicant |
| US6510466(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Cox et al. | Applicant |
| US6546002(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Kim | Applicant |
| US6574612(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Baratti et al. | Applicant |
| US6615258(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Barry et al. | Applicant |
| US6658452(B1) | 2003-12-01 | Becker et al. | Applicant |
| US6782527(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Kouznetsov et al. | Examiner |
| US6826398(B1) | 2004-11-01 | Lagerstrom et al. | Examiner |
| US6938080(B1) | 2005-08-01 | Kahveci et al. | Applicant |
| US7035918(B1) | 2006-04-01 | Redding et al. | Applicant |
| US7062567(B2) | 2006-06-01 | Benitez et al. | Examiner |
| US7200632(B1) | 2007-04-01 | Greschler et al. | Applicant |
| US7275095(B1) | 2007-09-01 | Lebouill | Examiner |
| US2001/0047386(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Domenikos | Applicant |
| US2001/0049632(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Rigole | Applicant |
| US2002/0010776(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Lerner | Applicant |
| CA2268683 | 2000-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP332304 | 1989-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JP4-232541 | 1992-08-01 | Applicant | |
| JP5-274275 | 1993-10-01 | Applicant | |
| JP6-223040 | 1994-08-01 | Applicant | |
| JP7-200492 | 1995-08-01 | Applicant | |
| JP8-137768 | 1996-05-01 | Applicant | |
| JP9-054734 | 1997-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP9-305675 | 1997-11-01 | Applicant | |
| JP10-187455 | 1998-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP11-007391 | 1999-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2000-022753 | 2000-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2000-047870 | 2000-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2000-132397 | 2000-05-01 | Applicant | |
| KR2000-030889 | 2000-06-01 | Applicant | |
| NL1008262(C) | 1999-11-01 | Applicant | |
| NL1012322(C) | 2000-12-01 | Applicant | |
| RU2155984 | 2000-10-01 | Applicant | |
| SE507319 | 1997-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO9220022 | 1992-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO72185 | 2000-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO101313 | 2001-01-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (177)
- Agent-based Software Configuration and Development, Richard Scott Hall, 1999.Examiner
- Novadigm, Inc., “Novadigm Says It's Breakthrough ‘Software Manager’ Products Can Drastically Reduce Administration Costs by Automatically Personalizing Desktop Software,” Network Computer News, Oct. 21, 1997.Applicant
- Novadigm, Inc., Description of Radia Software Manager, 1998.Applicant
- Red Hat, Inc., “The Official Red Hat Linux Installation Guide,” Red Hat Linux Version 6.0, 1995-1999, TOC only;Full doc (682 pgs) available online at www.redhat.com.Applicant
- Ram R. Vangala, Michael J. Cripps, Raj G. Varadarajan, “Software Distribution and Management in a Networked Environment,” 1992 Lisa VI, Long Beach, CA, Oct. 19-23, 1992.Applicant
- Jeffrey Veen, “That's Marimba, Not Macarena,” Wired News, Oct. 21, 1996.Applicant
- Excerpts from Beyond.com eCurrent/Novadigm Press Releases, Nov. 9, 1999, Oct. 12, 1999, and Sep. 7, 1999.Applicant
- Email regarding comments on U.S. Patent No. 4,815,030, Jun. 22, 2006.Applicant
- Email regarding comments on U.S. Patent No. 5,881,144, Jul. 16, 2006.Applicant
- Email regarding articles from prior art search including, Ellen Messmer, “Sirrus Adds ‘Extranet’ Strength to Server,” Network World, Nov. 2, 1998, Denise Pappalardo, “ASPS Come in a Variety of shapes and sizes,” Network World, Nov. 15, 1999; Dennis Williams, “Application delivery on a grand scale,” Network World, Mar. 22, 1999; Business Wire, “Intel Online Services to Provide High-Performance Hosting Service,” Business Wire, Nov. 2, 1999;Timothy Morgan, “IBM Pushes Software Subscriptions for AIX,” Computergram International.Applicant
- Marimba Products, “Castanet White Paper (including comments re same),” Sep. 30, 1998; Oct. 5, 1998.Applicant
- Marimba, Inc., “Castanet Developer Documentations, Plugin Development: The Big Picture,” 1997, Oct. 5, 1998.Applicant
- Marimba, “Castanet White Paper,” Jun. 9, 1997.Applicant
- Red Hat, Inc., “The Official Red Hat Linux Reference Guide,” 1999.Applicant
- Richard S. Hall, Dennis Heimbinger, Andre Van Der Hoek, and Alexander L. Wolf, “An Architecture for Post-Development Configuration Management in a WAN,” Proceedings of the 1997 Inter. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, Baltimore, MD, May 1997.Applicant
- Core Competence and David Strom, Internet @ppliance Industry Report re eSoft InstaGate, 1999-2000.Applicant
- Core Competence and David Strom, “Technologic InstaGate product report,” 1998-1999.Applicant
- Business Wire, “eSoft Executes Letter of Intent to Acquire Apexx Technology, Inc.; Merger to Create Largest Installed Base of All-In-One Internet Appliances,” Business Wire, Nov. 24, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Internet Scanner from Internet Security Systems,” Nov. 19, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc. “InstaGate website screenshot.”Applicant
- Technologic, Inc. “Technologic News Release re acquisition by eSoft,” 1999.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Ordering Sheet for InstaGate Product Bundles,” 1999.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Interceptor Firewall Appliance Ordering Information,” Dec. 1, 1998.Applicant
- Internet Security Systems, Inc., “ISS' Internet Scanner Awarded ‘Security Product of the Year’ at UK Networking Industry Event,” Press release, Jun. 29, 1998.Applicant
- Internet Security Systems, Inc., “Internet Security Systems Internet Scanner wins highly acclaimed SC Award for Third Consecutive Year,” Press release, Apr. 18, 2000.Applicant
- Internet Security Systems, Inc., “ISS Receives Highest Rating from PC/Computing, Internet Scanner Named Market's Most Comprehensive Security Assesment Solution,” Press release, Mar. 22, 1999.Applicant
- Matthew Beale, “eSoft Sold on Linux, Goes With Red Hat,” E-Commerce Times, Sep. 16, 1999.Applicant
- Edge Publishing, “eSoft Unveils Business Blueprint for Future,” Work-Group Computing Report, Apr. 12, 1999.Applicant
- Amy Kukuk, “New Products,” Linux Journal, Jan. 1, 1999.Applicant
- Business Wire, “Apexx Tecnology Announces Strategic Partnership with UUNET Tech., Inc. and NetPartners Internet Solutions, Inc. to Offer Complete Internet Access Solutions,” Business Wire, Jun. 30, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Product Brochure for Interceptor Firewall Appliance,” date unknown.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Awards Reviews and Certifications for InstaGate Product,” date unknown.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Diagrams relating to InstaGate Product,” 1999.Applicant
- Esoft, Inc., “The TEAM Internet Model 2500 Architecture and Design,” White Paper, date unknown.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “eSoft Completes Merger with Technologic, Inc.,” Press release, Sep. 13, 1999.Applicant
- Business Wire, “eSoft and High-End Networking Firm Alternative Technology Sign Distribution Pact,” Business Wire, Feb. 23, 1999.Applicant
- Mitt Jones, “Thin Servers Plug Growing Businesses Into the Net,” Information Week Online, Mar. 27, 2000.Applicant
- Edge Publishing., “Internet Strategy: eSoft Unveils Business Blueprint for Future; Strategy Leverages Company's Internet and Software Engineering Strengths—TEAM Internet product line—Company Business and Marketing,” Edge: Work-Group Computing Report, Apr. 12, 1999.Applicant
- Core Competence and David Strom, Inc., “Product Demonstration Report and Presentations,” N&I Las Vegas '98 Presentation, 1998.Applicant
- IDG Books Worldwide, Inc., “Open Source: The Unauthorized White Papers, Chapter 9, The Secret Battlefield: Embedded Systems,” 2000.Applicant
- Business Wire, “Technologic Introduces Version of Interceptor Firewall for use with Microsoft Provy Server,” Business Wire, Dec. 2, 1996.Applicant
- Internet Security Systems, Inc., “Point . . . Click . . . Launch an External Attack on Your Net,” Press Release, May 13, 1996.Applicant
- Tim Clark, “Firewall appliance market takes off,” CNET news, Aug. 6, 1997.Applicant
- Gail James and Miryana Bunic, “All-in-one security appliances,” Network World, Apr. 19, 1999.Applicant
- Peter Galvin, “Firewalls in many flavors,” Sunworld, Jan. 1996.Applicant
- FWTK.ORG, “Information regarding Firewall Toolkit,” date unknown.Applicant
- National Software Testing Laboratories, “About to buy a Firewall? Read this first,” GCN.com, Aug. 4, 1997.Applicant
- Weiser Publications, Inc., “Interceptor 2.0—Technologic, Inc's Internet firewall—Brief Article—Product Announcement,” Software Magazine, Jul. 1996.Applicant
- Tim Clark, “Firewall Appliance Market Takes Off,” Netsys.com, Aug. 7, 1997.Applicant
- Keith Schultz, “Interceptor Offers Forewall Flexibility,” Information Week Online, Sep. 14, 1998.Applicant
- Marcus Goncalves, “Firewalls Complete—Chapter 14 ‘Types of Firewalls and Products on the Market’,” McGraw-Hill 1997.Applicant
- USPTO, “Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/869,552,” Oct. 5, 2009, 14 Pages.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., Various product pages relating to Technologic Interceptor product, Mar. 3, 1999.Applicant
- Business Wire, “eSoft Executes Letter of Intent to Acquire Apexx Technology Inc.; Merger to Create Largest Installed Base of All-In-One Internet Appliances,”.Applicant
- Business Wire, “eSoft to Begin Trading on Nasdaq,” Business Wire, Jul. 30, 1998.Applicant
- Business Wire, “eSoft Trades on Nasdaq,” Business Wire, Aug. 4, 1998.Applicant
- Business Wire, “eSoft Expands North American Distribution Through Affinity Marketing Deal; New Partner to Sell and Distribute IPAD in Canada,” Business Wire, Jan. 21, 1999.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc. “Various product descriptions and information concerning the InstaGate Product,” Feb. 16, 1999.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “eSoft Executes Letter of Intent to Acquire Technologic, Inc.,” Press release, Jul. 22, 1999.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “InstaGate Appliance Delivers Internet Connectivity, Complete with Built-In VPN Capabilities,” Press release, Feb. 16, 1999.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Resellers: Present Your Customers with a Free Network Security Scan,” Press release, Feb. 1, 1999.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Technologic Introduces New Version of Interceptor Firewall Appliance With MS Windows PPTP VPN Support,” Press release, Oct. 13, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Avdata's Around-the-Clock Network Monitoring Underpins Technologic Managed Forewall Services,” Press release, Sep. 25, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Technologic Launches VAR Program for Resellers Targeting Small and Mid-Size Businesses,” Press release, Aug. 11, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Interview Report Tool from Technologic Turns Firewall Data into Valuable Business Information,” Press release, Jun. 8, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Technologic and AvData Partner to Offer Managed Security Service with 24x7 Monitoring,” Press release, May 11, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Technologic Announces Japanese Distributor for Interceptor Security Software,” Press release, Apr. 21, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Technologic and Secure Computing Improve End-User Productivity With New Web Access Control Capabilities in Firewall Appliance,” Press release, Apr. 14, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “New Wizard Included with Technologic's Interceptor Firewall Appliance Reduces Installation Time to Less Than Half an Hour,” Press release, Mar. 17, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Virtual Private Networks Cutting Electronic Communication Costs by 80%,” Press release, Jan. 12, 1998.Applicant
- Technologic, Inc., “Interceptor Internet Security Appliance Provides Low-Cost Out of the box” Firewall Solution, Press release, Jun. 24, 1998.Applicant
- Netpartners, Inc., “NetPartners Launches Internet Filtering Product for Internet Service Providers,” Press release, Apr. 28, 1999.Applicant
- PR Newswire, Inc., “Esoft Launches Firewall with a Future,” Press release, Oct. 16, 2000;PR Newswire, Inc., “Hard times for esoft company that offers internet security shifts focus in bid to become profitable,” Press release, Feb. 12, 2001; PR Newswire, Inc., “Esoft Unveils Softpak Director for Instagate Ex; One touch delivery of new applications, services and upgrades,” Press release, Nov. 7, 2000.Applicant
- Definition of DNSBL, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.Applicant
- Dan Goodin, “Network Solutions is threatening to sue an influential antispam group if it provides a filter that could be used by hundreds od networks worldwide to block the dominant registrars's email,” CNET News.com, Aug. 2, 1999.Applicant
- Paul Festa, “A controversial antispam tool has acquired legitimacy with the addition of a new subscriber: Hotmail, the 800-pound gorilla of Web-based email,” CNET News.com, Nov. 9, 1999.Applicant
- Internet Security Systems, Inc., “ISS Protects eCommerce Sites from Latest Denial of Service Hacker Attacks, Releases New Versions of SAFEsuite Product Line,” Press release, Dec. 28, 1999.Applicant
- Internet Security Systems, Inc., “Internet Security Systems Ships New Version of Leading Intrusion Detection Software, RealSecure,” Press release, Mar. 11, 1999.Applicant
- Internet Security Systems, Inc., Secure Computing Corporation and ISS Announce Best of Breed Integration of Firewall, Intrusion Detection and Assessment Enhancing E. Security for All Business, Press release, Mar. 15, 1999.Applicant
- Internet Security Systems, Inc., “ISS Ships New Version of Market-Leading Internet Scanner, Delivers Enhanced Solution for Managing E-Business Security risks,” Press Release, Oct. 5, 1999.Applicant
- Internet Security Systems, Inc., “ISS Named Market Leader in Netowrk Security Assessment and Intrusion Detection by IDC,” Press release, Aug. 9, 1999.Applicant
- Google groups article thread regarding “Red Hat Update Agent Packets,” Nov. 3, 1999.Applicant
- Google groups article regarding “documentation for for the ‘up2date’ update agent?,” Oct. 20, 1999.Applicant
- Google groups article regarding “Tracking RedHat updates without a RedHat support contract,” Dec. 16, 1999.Applicant
- Google groups article thread regarding “just curious about Debian vs RedHat,” Oct. 27, 1999.Applicant
- Google groups article thread regarding “LWN Distributions,” Sep. 30, 1999.Applicant
- Google groups article thread regarding “What is a modern OS feature,” Oct. 4, 1999.Applicant
- Eric Doyle, “Keeping Linux under control (company business and marketing),” Computer Weekly, Oct. 12, 2000.Applicant
- Proquest Information and Learning, “Open to Acceptance,” Electronic Times, Oct. 9, 2000.Applicant
- Dallas Morning News, “Colorado-based eSoft rides high on popularity of Linux,” Dallas Morning News, Dec. 27, 1999.Applicant
- Warren S. Hersch, “Delivering Linux to E-businesses—Vendor eSoft unveils licensing program,” Computer Reseller News, Jul. 5, 1999.Applicant
- Kris Hudson, “Big-name deal send eSoft stock soaring 700 percent,” Boulder Daily Camera, Dec. 29, 1999.Applicant
- PR Newswire, “Cobalt Networks Unveils Next Generation Qube(TM) Server Appliance,” PR Newswire, Oct. 11, 2000.Applicant
- The Gale Group, “CSN 371-37 Cobalt Readies New Cube,” Client Server News (USA), Oct. 16, 2000.Applicant
- April Jacobs, “Cobalt rolls out new server appliance,” Network World, Oct. 12, 2000.Applicant
- Amy Kukuk, “New Product Review for Applixware 4.4.1,” Linux Journal Magazine, Jan. 1, 1999.Applicant
- Tony Smith, “Apexx commenses channel development drive,” The Register, Feb. 10, 1999.Applicant
- Christine Zimmerman, “Thin Servers: Off-the-shelf-help,” (Buyers Guide) Data Communications, Apr. 7, 1999.Applicant
- Warren S. Hersch, “Delivering Linux to E-Business,” Daily News Archive, Jun. 30, 1999.Applicant
- Core Competence and David Strom, “Embedded Web Servers,” Excerpts from N&I Las Vegas Presentation, 1998.Applicant
- Network Computing, Product Listing and descriptions from Network Computing, Feb. 21, 1997.Applicant
- Christopher Lindquist, “Internet Appliances Get Real,” PC Magazine, May 1, 1999.Applicant
- Back to the future: using application service providers, Knoblauch, C. Conference: Internet Librarian 2000. Proceedings—2000. Internet Conference and Exhibition for Librarians and Information Managers, p. 67-72, Information Today, Medford, NJ, USA 2000.Applicant
- An XML/XSL based software architecture for application service providers (ASPs), Gunther, O., Ricou, O., Pole University, Paris France, Conference: Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies, First International Conference, EXWeb 2000, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1875), p. 334-48.Applicant
- Business models for ASP Marketplaces, Tamm, G., Gunther, O., Inst. of Inf. Syst., Humboldt university, Berlin, Germany, Conference: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Information Systems Part: vol. 2, p. 968-75 vol. 2, Jul. 3-5, 2000, Vienna, Austria.Applicant
- An advanced interent XML/EDI model based on secure XML documents, Miyazawa, T., Kushida, T., Res. Lab., IBM Res., Tokyo, Japan, Conference: Proceedings Seventh International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems: Workshops, p. 295-300, Editor: Shibata, Y. Publisher: IEEE Comput. Soc., Los Alamitos, CA USA 2000, Jul. 4-7, 2000, Iwate, Japan.Applicant
- Application Service providers, Dewire, D.T., Information systems management, vol. 17, No. 4, p. 14-19, Auerbach Publications, Fall 2000.Applicant
- Application Service providers can provide cost-effective outsourcing solutions, IT cost management strategies, vol. 19, No. 8, p. 1-3, Computer Economics, Aug. 2000.Applicant
- Getting what you pay for from ASP's, Turner, M.J., Business Communications Review, vol. 30, No. 7, p. 38, 40, 42, BCR Enterprises, Jul. 2000.Applicant
- ASPirin for outsourcing headaches, Pusateri, R., Deloitte Consulting, Kansas City, MO, USA, Telephony, vol. 238, No. 9, p. 68, 70, 72, 74; Feb. 28, 2000.Applicant
- Lost among the ASPs, Harney, J., Intelligent Enterprise, vol. 3, No. 3, p. 26-7, 30-1, 34, Miller Freeman, Feb. 9, 2000.Applicant
- ASPs: service bureau redux or tectonic change?, Waters, J.K., Application Development Trends, vol. 7, No. 1, p. 49-50, 52-3, 101 Communications LLC, Jan. 2000.Applicant
- System development using application services over the net, Takahashi, Kenji, Emmerich, Wolfgang, Finkelstein, Anthony, Guerra, Sofia Ntt, Tokyo, Japan, Conference: 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland, 19000604-19000611, International Conference on software engineering 2000, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.Applicant
- Innovative Internet architecture for application service providers, Furht, Borko, Phoenix, Chris, Yin, John, Aganovic, Zijad, Florida Atlantic Univ., Boca Raton, FL, Conference: the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on System Sciences (1-133), Maui, USA, p. 157, 2000.Applicant
- A framework for ASP-marketplaces, CoopIS 2000: cooperative information systems: Eilat, Sep. 6-8, 2000, Tamm G., Guenther, O.; Etzion Opher Ed.; Scheurmann, Peter Ed., Institute of Information Systems, Humboldt Univ., Spandauer Strasse 1 10178 Berlin, Germany; Conference: Cooperative Information Systems, International Conference, 7, Jun. 2009, Lecture notes in computer science, 2000, vol. 1901, p. 114-119.Applicant
- Business to business electronic commerce systems and services., SmartEC Solution. Setoguchi Tatsuya Manchu Yutaka Katsumata Masato, Toshiba Johoshakaishisutemusha Toshiba Rebyu (Toshiba Review), 2000, vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 58-61.Applicant
- Enabling flexible cross-version interoperability for distributed services, Senivongse, T., Dept of computer engineering, Chulalongkorn Univ., Bangkok, Thailand, Conference: Proceedings of the international Symposium on distributed objects and applications, p. 201-10, IEEE Comput. Soc., Los Alamitos, CA, Sep. 5-6, 1999, Edinburgh, UK.Applicant
- Expert report of Aviel Rubin re ′773 Patent; Dec. 15, 2006 (Redacted).Applicant
- Spielman Rebuttal Report; Jan. 25, 2007.Applicant
- Cobalt Networks unveils next generation Qube server appliance; Oct. 11, 2000.Applicant
- Neugeboren O'Dowd PC, “Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/154,891” filed Apr. 14, 2009 29 Pages.Applicant
- “Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/154,891,” Dec. 30, 2009, 34 Pages.Applicant
- “Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,211,” Dec. 10, 2009, 46 pages.Applicant
- Neugeboren O'Dowd PC, “Response to Dec. 10, 2009 Office Action as resubmitted by applicant,” Feb. 17, 2010, 32 pages.Applicant
- Canjex Publishing, Ltd., “eSoft's TEAM Internet to participate in Albertson's technology grant,” Canada Stockwatch, Feb. 16, 1999.Applicant
- Comtex News Network, “eSoft Releases Free Software Upgrade for Its Team Internet Product Line,” Sinocast, Feb. 8, 1999.Applicant
- Comtex News Network, “eSoft's Version 2.5 Software Reduces Set Up to Five Easy Steps With a Ten-Minute Installation,” Sinocast, Feb. 8, 1999.Applicant
- Comtex News Network, “Apexx Technology: New thin server launched,” Sinocast, Feb. 4, 1999.Applicant
- Ziff-Davis Publishing, “MVP Hardware: Desktop Systems & Servers,” PC Magazine, Jan. 1, 1999.Applicant
- Comtex News Network, “Cobalt Qube 2700WG Wins PC Computing's 1998 MVP Award for Small Business Server Category and Innovation of the Year,” Sinocast, Nov. 16, 1998.Applicant
- Ziff Davis Publishing, “New Products: Apexx Team Internet 300 Series,” Computer Shopper, Nov. 1, 1998.Applicant
- Boucher Communications, Inc., “RPG, COBOL Developers Deliver Thin Client Applications,” HP Professional, Nov. 1, 1998.Applicant
- Comtex News Network, “Good Things in a Small Box,” Sinocast, Aug. 10, 1998.Applicant
- Comtex News Network, “Apexx Technology, Inc. announces Strategic Partnership with UUNET Technologies, Inc. and NetPartners Internet Solutions, Inc. to Offer,” Sincast, Jun. 30, 1999.Applicant
- Comtex News Network, “TEAM Internet 300 Series Delivers the Tools for Growing Organizations to Control Individual Internet Usage,” Sinocast, Jun. 9, 1998.Applicant
- Andre Kvitka, “Team Internet puts workgroups on the Web,” InfoWorld, May 4, 1998.Applicant
- Comtex News Network, “Apexx Technology TEAM Internet Becomes the First Internet Access Thin Server to Break the $3000 Barrier for High-Speed Internet Connectivity and productivity,” Sinocast, Mar. 12, 1998.Applicant
- New York Law Publishing Company, “TEAM Internet 2.0 Connects Networks,” Law Technology Product News, Jan. 1998.Applicant
- Extended Systems, “Extended Systems and Apexx Technology Announce Joint Marketing Program for Interent Access Products,” Press Release, Jun. 15, 1998.Applicant
- Comtex News Network, Apexx Technology announces TEAM Internet 2.0, Complete Internet Connectivity and an ‘Instant Business Presence’ for Networked Small,Sinocast, Dec. 8, 1997.Applicant
- Ziff Davis Publishing, “Put your Net on the Net,” PC Magazine, Oct. 1997.Applicant
- New York Law Publishing Company, “Apexx Announces Team Internet LAN,” Law Technology Product News, Feb. 1997.Applicant
- Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand of Barracuda Networks, Civil Action No. 06-cv-OO435-REB-MEH, Apr. 4, 2006.Applicant
- Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand of Fortinet, Inc., Civil Action No. 06-cv-OO443-REB-CBS, Apr. 4, 2006.Applicant
- Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand of Sonicwall, Inc., Civil Action No. I: O6-cv-OO445-LTB, Apr. 4, 2006.Applicant
- Defendant Sonicwall's Objections and Responses to Plaintiff eSoft, Inc.'s First Request for Production of Documents; Civil Action No. I:O6-cv-OO445-LTB, Jun. 15, 2006.Applicant
- Defendant Sonicwall's Objections and Responses to Plaintiff eSoft, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories; Civil Action No. I: O6-cv-OO445-LTB, Jun. 15, 2006.Applicant
- Blue Coat Systems, Inc.'S Answer to Plaintiff'S First Amended Complaint, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims, Civil Action No. 06-CV-442-EWN-PAC, Jun. 29, 2006.Applicant
- Defendant Fortinet's Responses to Plaintiff eSoft, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents, Action No. :06-cv-OO443-REB-CBS, Jun. 30, 2006.Applicant
- Blue Coat Systems, Inc.'S Response to eSOFT, Inc.'S First Set of Interrogatories and RFPs, Civil Action No. 06-CV-442-EWN-PAC (Redacted), Jul. 9, 2006.Applicant
- Defendant St. Bernard Software, Inc.'s Response to Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories, Civil Action No. 06-CV-00697 EWN-MJW, Aug. 7, 2006.Applicant
- Defendant St. Bernard Software, Inc.'s Response to Plaintiffs First Set of Requests for Documents, Civil Action No. 06-CV-00697 EWN-MJW, Aug. 7, 2006.Applicant
- Answer and Counterclaims of St. Bernard Software, Inc. Civil Action No. 06-CV-00697, Aug. 30, 2006.Applicant
- Defendant Fortinet's Amended Objections and Responses to Plaintiff eSoft, Inc.'s Interrogatory No. 10, Civil Action No. 06-CV-00443-REB-CBS, Sep. 13, 2006.Applicant
- Defendant Barracuda's First Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff eSoft, Inc.'s Interrogatory Nos. 9, 11 and 12, Civil Action No. 06-cv-00435-REB-MEH, Sep. 22, 2006.Applicant
- Defendant Sonicwall's First Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff eSoft, Inc.'s Interrogatory Nos. 9, 11 and 12, Civil Action No. 06-cv-00445-LTB-PAC, Sep. 22, 2006.Applicant
- Defendant Astaro Corporation's Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff eSoft, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories, Civil Action No. 06-cv-00441-REB-MEH, Sep. 26, 2006.Applicant
- Astaro Corporations'First Amended Answer to ESOFT Inc.'s Amended Complaint Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims, Civil Action No. 06-cv-00441-REB-MEH, Oct. 11, 2006.Applicant
- Defendant Sonicwall, Inc'S First Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand, Civil Action No. 06-cv-00445-LTB-PAC, Oct. 26, 2006.Applicant
- Esoft, Inc.'S Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 06-cv-00445-LTB-PAC, Nov. 15, 2006.Applicant
- SonicWALL's Opening Claim Construction Brief, SonicWALL's Opening Claim Construction Brief, Nov. 15, 2006.Applicant
- SonicWall Responsive Claim Construction Brief, Dec. 15, 2006.Applicant
- eSoft Reply to SonicWall Claim Construction Brief, Dec. 15, 2006.Applicant
- BlueCoat Motion for Summary Judgment re Invalidity of Claims 1-8 of ′773 Patent, Feb. 13, 2007.Applicant
- BlueCoat Motion for Summary Judgement re Invalidity of claim 1 of ′773 Patent, Feb. 13, 2007.Applicant
- BlueCoat Motion for Summary Judgment re Invalidity of claims 1, 5, and 7 of ′773 Patent, Feb. 13, 2007.Applicant
- Expert report of Richard Hall, Ph.D re ′773 Patent, Jan. 4, 2007.Applicant
- Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,961,773 dated Jan. 8, 2007.Applicant
- USPTO, “Office Action in pending Inter Partes Reexamination No. 95000211”, Sep. 15, 2008, p. 68 Published in: US.Applicant
- Esoft, Inc., “Response to Sep. 15, 2008 Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination No. 95000211”, Nov. 25, 2008, p. 167, Published in: US.Applicant
- USPTO—Marie Georges Henry “Office Action Responsive to communication filed Jan. 6, 2009”, Feb. 5, 2009, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.Applicant
- “Office Action Response in U.S. Appl. No. 11/154,891,” Sep. 21, 2009, 23 Pages.Applicant
- “Examiner Interview and Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/154,891,” Mar. 17, 2010, 13 pages.Applicant
- Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate in U.S. Appl. No. 98/000,211, Jul. 27, 2010, 18 pages.Applicant
- Right of Appeal Notice in U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,211, Jun. 18, 2010, 80 pages.Applicant
- Reexamination Certificate in U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,211, dated Nov. 2, 2010.Applicant
- Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,211, dated Feb. 17, 2010.Applicant