US 8,176,334 B2Grant
Document security system that permits external users to gain access to secured files
Issue Date:2012-05-08
•23 Claims
•10 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
An improved system and approaches for exchanging secured files (e.g., documents) between internal users of an organization and external users are disclosed. A file security system of the organization operates to protect the files of the organization and thus prevents or limits external users from accessing internal documents. Although the external users are unaffiliated with the organization (i.e., not employees or contractors), the external users often have working relationships with internal users. These working relationships (also referred to herein as partner relationships) often present the need for file (document) exchange. According to one aspect, external users having working relationships with internal users are able to be given limited user privileges within the file security system, such that restricted file (document) exchange is permitted between such internal and external users.
Metadata
Assignee
- Guardian Data Storage, LLC
Inventor
- Klimenty Vainstein
Application Information
Application Number:US 10/262,218
Filing Date:2002-09-30
Priority Date:2002-09-30
Art Unit:2493
Classifications
IPC:
G06F21/00G06F7/04G06F17/30G06F15/16H04L29/00H04L29/06H04N7/16
Patent Drawings (10 sheets)
Description
Cross-Reference to Related Application
[0001] This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/075,194, filed Feb. 12, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,065,713 issued on Nov. 22, 2011 and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING MULTI-LOCATION ACCESS MANAGEMENT TO SECURED ITEMS,” which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Background of the Invention
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] The present invention relates to security systems for data and, more particularly, to security systems that protect data in an inter/intra enterprise environment.
[0004] 2. Description of Related Art
[0005] The Internet is the fastest growing telecommunications medium in history. This growth and the easy access it affords have significantly enhanced the opportunity to use advanced information technology for both the public and private sectors. It provides unprecedented opportunities for interaction and data sharing among businesses and individuals. However, the advantages provided by the Internet come with a significantly greater element of risk to the confidentiality and integrity of information. The Internet is an open, public and international network of interconnected computers and electronic devices. Without proper security measures, an unauthorized person or machine may intercept any information traveling across the Internet, and may even get access to proprietary information stored in computers that interconnect to the Internet, but are otherwise generally inaccessible by the public.
[0006] As organizations become more dependent on networks for business transactions, data sharing, and everyday communications, their networks have to be increasingly accessible to customers, employees, suppliers, partners, contractors and telecommuters. Unfortunately, as the accessibility increases, so does the exposure of critical data that is stored on the network. Hackers can threaten all kinds of valuable corporate information resources including intellectual property (e.g., trade secrets, software code, and prerelease competitive data), sensitive employee information (e.g., payroll figures and HR records), and classified information (e.g., passwords, databases, customer records, product information, and financial data). Thus data security is becoming increasingly mission-critical.
[0007] There are many efforts in progress aimed at protecting proprietary information traveling across the Internet and controlling access to computers carrying the proprietary information. Every day hundreds of thousands of people interact electronically, whether it is through e-mail, e-commerce (business conducted over the Internet), ATM machines or cellular phones. The perpetual increase of information transmitted electronically has led to an increased reliance on cryptography.
[0008] In protecting the proprietary information traveling across the Internet, one or more cryptographic techniques are often used to secure a private communication session between two communicating computers on the Internet. Cryptographic techniques provide a way to transmit information across an unsecure communication channel without disclosing the contents of the information to anyone eavesdropping on the communication channel. An encryption process is a cryptographic technique whereby one party can protect the contents of data in transit from access by an unauthorized third party, yet the intended party can read the data using a corresponding decryption process.
[0009] Many organizations have deployed firewalls, Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), and Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) to provide protection. Unfortunately, these various security means have been proven insufficient to reliably protect proprietary information residing on their internal networks. For example, depending on passwords to access sensitive documents from within often causes security breaches when the password of a few characters long is leaked or detected.
[0010] Enterprise security solutions secure data within an enterprise premise (e.g., internal networks). Some enterprise security solutions prohibit external users (clients) to have any access to secure data. Unfortunately, such enterprise security solutions are not suitable for use in a collaborative environment in which both regular internal users (e.g., employees) and external users (e.g., consultants) need to access some secured data of the enterprise.
[0011] Thus, there is a need for improved approaches to enable file security systems to permit external users to access secured data without compromising the integrity of an enterprise security system.
Summary of the Invention
[0012] The invention relates to an improved system and approaches for exchanging secured files (e.g., documents) between internal users of an organization and external users. A file security system of the organization operates to protect the files of the organization and thus prevents or limits external users from accessing internal documents. Although the external users are unaffiliated with the organization (i.e., not employees or contractors), the external users often have working relationships with internal users. These working relationships (also referred to herein as partner relationships) often present the need for file (document) exchange. According to one aspect of the invention, external users having working relationships with internal users are able to be given limited user privileges within the file security system, such that restricted file (document) exchange is permitted between such internal and external users.
[0013] The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a method, system, device, and computer readable medium. Several embodiments of the invention are discussed below.
[0014] As a method for releasing a document from an internal user to an external user of a document security system, one embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: receiving a request from an internal user of an organization to release a secured document to an external user that is not affiliated with the organization; obtaining a public key associated with the external user; encrypting at least a portion of the secured document using the public key associated with the external user; imposing access control restrictions to limit access rights of the external user with respect to the secured document; and releasing the secured document to the external user.
[0015] As a method for releasing a document from an external user to an internal user of a document security system, one embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: identifying a document to be released from the external user to the internal user; receiving a public key associated with the internal user from the document security system over a data network; authenticating that the received public key originated from the document security system over the data network; encrypting, using the received public key, at least a portion of the document to be transmitted from the external user to the internal user; and subsequently releasing the document to the internal user.
[0016] As a method for distributing keys from a file security system to external users, one embodiment of the invention includes at least the acts of: receiving, from an external user, a request for a public key of an internal user; determining whether the external user is permitted to receive the public key associated with the internal user; retrieving the public key associated with the internal user; preparing a response to the request, the response including at least the public key associated with the internal user when the determining determines that the external user is permitted to receive the public key; and transmitting the response to the external user.
[0017] As a computer readable medium including at least computer program code for releasing a file between an internal user and an external user of a file security system, one embodiment of the invention includes at least: computer program code for identifying a secured file to be released to a selected user, the selected user being one of the internal user and the external user; computer program code for obtaining a public key associated with the selected user; computer program code for encrypting at least a portion of the secured file using the public key associated with the selected user; and computer program code for releasing the secured file to the selected user.
[0018] As a system for restricting access to files, one embodiment of the invention includes at least: a server having an access manager that restricts access to files of an organization and maintains at least encryption keys for a plurality of internal users and a plurality of external users; and an external access server that permits file exchange between the internal users and the external users via the server in limited circumstances. The external access server is coupled between the server and a data network, and the external users couple to the data network to interact with the external access server.
[0019] Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon examining the following detailed description of an embodiment thereof, taken in conjunction with the attached drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0020] The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:
[0021] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a document security system according to one embodiment of the invention.
[0022] FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of relationship setup processing according to one embodiment of the invention.
[0023] FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of document delivery processing according to one embodiment of the invention.
[0024] FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of document access processing according to one embodiment of the invention.
[0025] FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of access control processing according to one embodiment of the invention.
[0026] FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of client-side document delivery processing according to one embodiment of the invention.
[0027] FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of server-side document delivery processing according to one embodiment of the invention.
[0028] FIG. 8 shows a basic security system in which the invention may be practiced in accordance with one embodiment thereof.
[0029] FIG. 9 shows an exemplary data structure of a secured file that may be used in one embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0030] The invention relates to an improved system and approaches for exchanging secured files (e.g., documents) between internal users of an organization and external users. A file security system of the organization operates to protect the files of the organization and thus prevents or limits external users from accessing internal documents. Although the external users are unaffiliated with the organization (i.e., not employees or contractors), the external users often have working relationships with internal users. These working relationships (also referred to herein as partner relationships) often present the need for file (document) exchange. According to one aspect of the invention, external users having working relationships with internal users are able to be given limited user privileges within the file security system, such that restricted file (document) exchange is permitted between such internal and external users. The invention is suitable for use in an enterprise file security system.
[0031] A file security system (or document security system) serves to limit access to files (documents) to authorized users. Often, an organization, such as a company, would use a file security system to limit access to its files (documents). For example, users of a group might be able to access files (documents) pertaining to the group, whereas other users not within the group would not be able to access such files (documents). Such access, when permitted, would allow a user of the group to retrieve a copy of the file (document) via a data network.
[0032] As used herein, a user may mean a human user, a software agent, a group of users, a member of a group of users, a device and/or application. Besides a human user who needs to access a secured document, a software application or agent sometimes needs to access secured files in order to proceed. Accordingly, unless specifically stated, the “user” as used herein does not necessarily pertain to a human being.
[0033] Secured files are files that require one or more keys, passwords, access privileges, etc. to gain access to their content. According to one aspect of the invention, the security is provided through encryption and access rules. The files, for example, can pertain to documents, multimedia files, data, executable code, images and text. In general, a secured file can only be accessed by authenticated users with appropriate access rights or privileges. In one embodiment, each secured file is provided with a header portion and a data portion, where the header portion contains or points to security information. The security information is used to determine whether access to associated data portions of secured files is permitted.
[0034] In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will become obvious to those skilled in the art that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. The description and representation herein are the common meanings used by those experienced or skilled in the art to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuitry have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the present invention.
[0035] Reference herein to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Further, the order of blocks in process flowcharts or diagrams representing one or more embodiments of the invention do not inherently indicate any particular order nor imply any limitations in the invention.
[0036] Embodiments of the present invention are discussed herein with reference to FIGS. 1-9 . However, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the detailed description given herein with respect to these figures is for explanatory purposes as the invention extends beyond these limited embodiments.
[0037] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a document security system 100 according to one embodiment of the invention. The document security system 100 is responsible for providing protection of electronic data in an organization and includes a central server 102 that controls the overall operation of the document security system 100. The central server 102 imposes restrictions on the access to secured documents that are stored centrally or locally.
[0038] The central server 102 is assisted by a key store 104. Among other things, the key store 104 can store key pairs (public and private keys). In one embodiment, the key store 104 can be implemented in a database that stores key pairs (among other things). The central server 102 is also assisted by local servers 106 and 108 that can provide distributed access control. Various internal users to an organization that are utilizing the document security system 100 interact with the central server 102 and/or one of the local servers 106 and 108. These internal users are represented by users 110-116. As illustrated in the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 , user I-A 110 and user I-B 112 are affiliated with the local server 106, and user I-C 114 and user I-D 116 are affiliated with the local server 108. It should be understood, however, that various other arrangements or configurations of local servers and users can be utilized.
[0039] The document security system 100 also facilitates access by external users to secured documents that are maintained by the document security system 100. In this regard, the document security system 100 includes an external access server 118. The external access server 118 allows external users to be granted access to some of the secured documents. More particularly, the external access server 118 is coupled between a private network 121 in the document security system 100 and a (public) data network 120 and thus facilitates the access from external users 122-128 to some of the secured files without compromising the security integrity of the document security system 100. The data network 120 is, for example, a global computer network, a wide area network or a local area network. However, since the external users 122-128 are not directly affiliated with the organization, the external users are therefore often given limited access rights to some of the secured documents from machines coupled to the data network 120. Although the document security system 100 shown in FIG. 1 illustrates multiple local servers 106 and 108, multiple internal users 110-116, multiple external users 122-128, it should be recognized that the document security system 100 can, more generally, utilize zero or more local servers, one or more internal users, and one or more external users.
[0040] According to one embodiment of the invention, external users are permitted to be members of user groups maintained by the central server 102. As such, the external users are able to exchange certain secured documents with internal users. In one embodiment, the exchange of the secured documents between internal and external users is limited to exchanges between members of a common user group. Despite document exchange capabilities, the external users are unable to perform various operations with respect to user groups that internal users would be able to perform. For example, external users would be unable to change group membership or to query group membership to determine who are the members of the user group. Typically, an external user would be added to a particular user group when a relationship between the organization and the external user is arranged. The exchange of documents between internal users and external users is secured using public key encryption. The document security system 100 manages the storage and accessibility of public and private keys for the internal and external users. The document security system 100 can advantageously minimize the client software needed at the machines utilized by the external users.
[0041] The invention facilitates exchange of files (e.g., documents) between internal users of an organization and external users. Although the external users are unaffiliated with the organization (i.e., not employees or contractors), the external users often have working relationships with internal users. These working relationships (also referred to herein as partner relationships) often present the need for file (document) exchange. A file security system (e.g., document security system 100) of the organization operates to protect the files of the organization and thus prevents or limits external users from accessing internal documents. According to the invention, external users having working relationships with internal users are able to be given limited user privileges within a file security system such that restricted file (document) exchange is permitted between such internal and external users.
[0042] FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of relationship setup processing 200 according to one embodiment of the invention. The relationship setup processing 200 operates to arrange or set up a partner relationship between a partner and an organization (e.g., company). The organization is typically represented by an internal user or a group of users, and the partner is typically represented by one or more external users.
[0043] The relationship setup processing 200 initially establishes 202 a partner relationship between a partner and an organization. In this context, the organization is deemed to protect various documents of the organization and its various internal users. In one embodiment, the organization uses a file (document) security system to protect the various documents. The partner is deemed external to the organization. However, the partner is desirous of exchanging documents with the organization. The partner relationship between the partner and the organization (or between respective members thereof) is such that document exchange is permitted so that mutual business objectives can be efficiently achieved. After the partner relationship has been established 202, key pairs are created 204. The key pairs are used in document exchanges between the partner and the organization (e.g., between respective individuals thereof). For example, each of the partner and the organization would have a public key for encryption, as well as a private key for decryption. For example, to release a document from the organization to the partner, the organization would secure (e.g., encrypt) the document using the public key of the partner and then, upon acquiring the secured document, the partner would unsecure (e.g., decrypt) the secured document using its private key. Similarly, when the partner releases a document to the organization, the partner can secure (e.g., encrypt) the document using the public key of the organization and then, upon acquiring the secured document, the organization can unsecure (e.g., decrypt) the document using its private key. After the key pairs are created 204, the key pairs can be stored 206 to a key store. In one embodiment, the key store is within the file security system. System rights for the partner can then be configured 208. The system rights can be configured to permit limited access privileges to the partner. For example, the partner can be configured to include one or more of its employees within a user group maintained for the organization. After the system rights have been configured 208, the relationship setup processing 200 ends.
[0044] According to one embodiment, a partner relationship between an organization and a partner can confer on the partner: (i) query rights, and (ii) rights to get public keys of the organization. For example query right might include the right to get members of a group used by the file security system. However, having the right to get public keys of the organization does not give access to secured documents of the organization.
[0045] FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of document delivery processing 300 according to one embodiment of the invention. The document delivery processing 300 serves to deliver a secured document from an internal user to an external user. The internal user is associated with an organization, and the external user is associated with the partner.
[0046] The document delivery processing 300 begins with a decision 302 that determines whether a request to release a document to an external user has been received. In one embodiment, the request to release a document to an external user is initiated by an internal user. When the decision 302 determines that a request to release a document to an external user has not yet been received, the document delivery processing 300 awaits such a request. In other words, the document delivery processing 300 can be considered to be invoked when a request to release a document to an external user is received.
[0047] After a request to release a document to an external user has been received, a public key associated with the external user is retrieved 304 from a key store. In general, the key store serves to store a plurality of keys utilized by a document security system of the organization. In one embodiment, the key store can be the key store 104 illustrated in FIG. 1 . Next, a decision 306 determines whether a public key associated with the external user was available from the key store. In one embodiment, the availability of the public key is controlled by the partner relationship. When the decision 306 determines that the key store does not have a public key associated with the external user, then the document is not permitted to be delivered to the external user and thus the request is denied 308. Here, the particular external user is deemed not authorized to exchange documents with either the organization in general, or an internal user in particular.
[0048] On the other hand, when the decision 306 determines that a public key associated with the external user is available from the key store, then at least a portion of security information for the secured document is encrypted 310 using the public key. In one embodiment, the secured document that is to be delivered to the external user has a security information portion (also known as a header portion) and a data portion. The security information portion includes the security information providing restrictive access to the secured document. The security information may include access control components, such as keys or access rules that are utilized to control access to the data portion of the secured document. When the decision 306 determines that a public key is available, then at least a part of the security information portion for the secured document is encrypted 310 using the public key. Then, access control restrictions can be imposed 312 on the external user. The access control restrictions can limit the type, character or extent of access that the external user is granted with respect to the secured document. For example, the access control restrictions can be imposed by providing access rules within the security information portion of the secured document. After the access control restrictions are imposed 312 and encryption 310 with the public key, the secured document is released 314 to the external user. In one embodiment, the secured document is released 314 by being transmitted. Typically, the transmission of the secured document to the external user is performed through one or more networks (e.g., data networks). After the secured document has been released 314 to the external user (or after operation 308 when the request to deliver the secured document to the external user is denied), the document delivery processing 300 is complete and ends.
[0049] FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of document access processing 400 according to one embodiment of the invention. The document access processing 400 involves an external user accessing a secured document that has been made available to the external user by an internal user.
[0050] The document access processing 400 begins with the external user acting to login 402 to an external access server. The external access server is associated with the document security system and utilized to permit limited external access to the document security system. As an example, the external access server can be the external access server 118 illustrated in FIG. 1 .
[0051] A decision 404 then determines whether the login 402 has been successful. When the decision 404 determines that login has not been successful, then access is denied 406 to the external access server and no secured documents are made available to external users. Following the operation 406, the document access processing 400 is complete and ends as the external user was unable to successfully log into the external access server.
[0052] On the other hand, when the decision 404 determines that the external user has successfully logged into the external access server, then a private key associated with the external user is retrieved 408. In one embodiment, the private key is downloaded from the document security system via the external access server. In another embodiment, the private key is recovered locally.
[0053] Next, a decision 410 determines whether an access request for an encrypted document has been received. When the decision 410 determines that an access request for the secured document has not yet been received, a decision 412 determines whether the document access processing 400 should end. When the decision 412 determines that the document access processing 400 should not end, then the document access processing 400 returns to repeat the decision 410 and subsequent operations. On the other hand, when the decision 412 determines that the document access processing 400 should end, then the document access processing 400 is complete and ends.
[0054] Alternatively, when the decision 410 determines that an access request for the secured document has been received, then at least a portion of the security information for the secured document is decrypted 414 using the private key. Next, document level security is evaluated 416 to permit or deny access to the document contents. Following the operation 416, the document access processing 400 is complete and ends.
[0055] FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of access control processing 500 according to one embodiment of the invention. The access control processing 500 is, for example, suitable for use as the operations carried out by the operation 416 illustrated in FIG. 4 .
[0056] The access control processing 500 initially obtains 502 access rules associated with the secured document. In one embodiment, the access rules are provided within the security information portion of the secured document. The access rules are then evaluated 504 against the access privilege of the user attempting to access the secured document. A decision 506 then determines whether the access rules are satisfied. When the decision 506 determines that the access rules are not satisfied, then access to the secured document is denied. Alternatively, when the decision 506 determines that the access rules are satisfied, then a file key associated with the secured document is obtained 510. In one embodiment, the file key is provided within the security information portion of the secured document. The file key can be encrypted or in a clear format. In the case in which the file key is itself encrypted, the file key is first decrypted. Next, the secured document is decrypted 512 using the file key. Following the operation 512, the access control processing 500 is complete and ends.
[0057] FIGS. 6 and 7 pertain to document delivery processing in which an external user provides a secured document to an internal user. FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of client-side document delivery processing 600 according to one embodiment of the invention. The client-side document delivery processing 600 is referred to as client-side because a client machine associated with the external user is performing or initiating the operations.
[0058] The client-side document delivery processing 600 begins with a decision 602 that determines whether a request (from an external user) to release a document to an internal user has been received. When the decision 602 determines that a request to release a document to an internal user has not yet been received, the client-side document delivery processing 600 awaits such a request. Once the decision 602 determines that a request to release a document to an internal user has been received, the client-side document delivery processing 600 continues. In other words, the client-side document delivery processing 600 can be considered to be invoked when the decision 602 determines that a request to release a document to an internal user has been received. The external user can interact with the client machine to initiate or make such a request.
[0059] After the decision 602 determines that a request to release a document to an internal user has been received, a public key associated with the internal user is requested 604. Here, according to one embodiment, the public key associated with the internal user is requested 604 from the document security system. A decision 606 then determines whether a response has been received. When the decision 606 determines that a response has not yet been received, the client-side document delivery processing 600 awaits such a response. When the decision 606 determines that a response has been received, a decision 608 first determines whether the request is from an external user who is what they claim to be. According to one embodiment, certificates are used prevent someone from impersonating someone else. Depending on implementation, a certification of the external user may be issued by a third party (e.g., Certificate Authority) or the document security system itself. When the decision 608 determines that the external user is not who they claim to be, then the request is denied 610 because the response received was presumably from an unauthorized user or system.
[0060] On the other hand, when the decision 608 determines that the external user is who they claim to be (i.e., an authorized user), a decision 612 determines whether a public key is available. Here, the response received is examined to determine whether the response includes the public key associated with the internal user. Hence, when the public key is available, it is provided with the response being received. In one embodiment, the availability of the public key is controlled by the partner relationship.
[0061] When the decision 612 determines that the public key is not available, then the request is denied 610 because the client machine does not have access to the public key associated with the internal user. On the other hand, when the decision 612 determines that the public key is available, then at least a portion of the security information for the secured document is encrypted 614 using the public key. In one embodiment, a file key within the security information for the secured document is encrypted using the public key. Thereafter, the secured document is released 616 to the internal user. In one embodiment, the secured document is released 616 by being transmitted. Following the operations 610 or 616, the client-side document delivery processing 600 is complete and ends.
[0062] FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of server-side document delivery processing 700 according to one embodiment of the invention. The server-side document delivery processing 700 is, for example, performed by the document security system, such as the document security system 100 illustrated in FIG. 1 . The server-side document delivery processing 700 is responsive to a public key request from the client-side document delivery processing 600.
[0063] The server-side document delivery processing 700 begins with a decision 702 that determines whether a request for a public key from an external user has been received. In one embodiment, the request is provided by the operation 604 of the client-side document delivery processing 600 illustrated in FIG. 6 . When the decision 702 determines that a request for a public key has not yet been received, then the server-side document delivery processing 700 awaits such a request. When the decision 702 determines that a request for a public key has been received, then a decision 704 determines whether the external user (requester) is authorized to obtain the public key. Here, the authorization can be determined based on whether a partner relationship has been previously established between the external user and an organization. When the decision 704 determines that the external user is not authorized to receive the public key, then a response is prepared 710 indicating that access has been denied.
[0064] On the other hand, when the decision 704 determines that the external user is authorized to obtain the public key, then the public key associated with the internal user is retrieved 706 from a key store. The key store can, for example, be implemented as a database provided within the document security system. After the public key associated with the internal user has been retrieved 706, a response including the public key can be prepared 708. After the response has been prepared in operations 708 or 710, the response is signed 712 with a certificate for the organization. In one embodiment, the certificate would have been previously embedded a priori in the machine (e.g., client machine) of the external user. The signed response is then transmitted 714 to the external user. Typically, the transmission of the signed response is sent to the external user over a secured channel through a network (data network, e.g., the Internet). Following the operation 714, the server-side document delivery processing 700 is complete and ends.
[0065] FIG. 8 shows a basic security system 800 in which the invention may be practiced in accordance with one embodiment thereof. The security system 800 may be employed in an enterprise or inter-enterprise environment. It includes a first server 808 (also referred to as a central server) providing centralized access management for the enterprise. The first server 808 can control restrictive access to files secured by the security system 800. To provide dependability, reliability and scalability of the system, one or more second servers 804 (also referred to as local servers, of which one is shown) may be employed to provide backup or distributed access management for users or client machines serviced locally. For illustration purposes, there are two client machines 801 and 802 being serviced by a local server 804. Alternatively, one of the client machines 801 and 802 may be considered as a networked storage device.
[0066] Secured files may be stored in either one of the devices 801, 802, 804, 806 and 812. When a user of the client machine 801 attempts to exchange a secured file with a remote destination 812 being used by an external user, one or more of the processing 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 and 700 discussed above are activated to ensure that the requested secured file is delivered without compromising the security imposed on the secured file.
[0067] FIG. 9 shows an exemplary data structure 920 of a secured file that may be used in one embodiment of the invention. The data structure 920 includes two portions: a header (or header portion) 922 and encrypted data (or an encrypted data portion) 924. The header 922 can be generated in accordance with a security template associated with the store and thus provides restrictive access to the data portion 924 which is an encrypted version of a plain file. Optionally, the data structure 920 may also include an error-checking portion 925 that stores one or more error-checking codes, for example, a separate error-checking code for each block of encrypted data 924. These error-checking codes may also be associated with a Cyclical Redundancy Check (CRC) for the header 922 and/or the encrypted data 924. The header 922 includes a flag bit or signature 927 and security information 926 that is in accordance with the security template for the store. According to one embodiment, the security information 926 is encrypted and can be decrypted with a user key associated with an authenticated user (or requester).
[0068] The security information 926 can vary depending upon implementation. However, as shown in FIG. 9 , the security information 926 includes a user identifier (ID) 928, access policy (access rules) 929, a file key 930 and other information 931. Although multiple user identifiers may be used, a user identifier 928 is used to identify a user or a group that is permitted to access the secured file. The access rules 929 provide restrictive access to the encrypted data portion 924. The file key 930 is a cipher key that, once obtained, can be used to decrypt the encrypted data portion 924 and thus, in general, is protected. In one implementation of the data structure 920, the file key 930 is encrypted in conjunction with the access rules 929. In another implementation of the data structure 920, the file key 930 is double encrypted with a protection key and further protected by the access rules 929. The other information 931 is an additional space for other information to be stored within the security information 926. For example, the other information 931 may be used to include other information facilitating secure access to the secured file, such as version number or author identifier.
[0069] The invention is preferably implemented by software or a combination of hardware and software, but can also be implemented in hardware. The invention can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data which can thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, DVDs, magnetic tape, optical data storage devices, and carrier waves. The computer readable medium can also be distributed over network-coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
[0070] The various embodiments, implementations and features of the invention noted above can be combined in various ways or used separately. Those skilled in the art will understand from the description that the invention can be equally applied to or used in other various different settings with respect to various combinations, embodiments, implementations or features provided in the description herein.
[0071] The advantages of the invention are numerous. Different embodiments or implementations may yield one or more of the following advantages. One advantage of the invention is that file security systems are able to protect secured files (e.g., documents) even when external users are provided limited access to secured files. Another advantage of the invention is that a file security system can permit external users to access certain secured files (e.g., secured documents) without compromising integrity of the file security system. For example, external users having working relationships with internal users are able to be given limited user privileges within the file security system such that restricted file (document) exchange is permitted between such internal and external users. Still another advantage of the invention is that that amount of specialized software required at machines utilized by external users is minimal.
[0072] The foregoing description of embodiments is illustrative of various aspects/embodiments of the present invention. Various modifications to the present invention can be made to the preferred embodiments by those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description of embodiments.
Claims
Certificate of Correction present
The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.
What is claimed is:
1. A method for releasing a secured document from a document security system, the method comprising:
receiving a request from a user affiliated with an organization to release a secured document including a security information portion and a data portion from the document security system, to an external user unaffiliated with the organization, wherein the document security system is associated with the organization, and wherein the security information portion includes a file key and access control restrictions pertaining to the data portion;
in response to receiving the request:
obtaining a public key associated with the external user;
encrypting the data portion of the secured document using the file key;
encrypting the security information portion of the secured document, including the file key, using the public key associated with the external user;
imposing the access control restrictions by including access rules in the security information portion, wherein the access rules are defined in a markup language and limit a type, a location, and an extent of access that the external user is granted with respect to the secured document, the location of access being one of within the organization or outside of the organization; and
releasing the secured document including the encrypted file key to the external user.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the document security system restricts access to a plurality of documents, the document security system comprising a key store that stores at least public keys associated with external users, and wherein the obtaining of the public key associated with the external user comprises obtaining the public key from the key store.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the security information portion of the secured document includes a header comprising the encrypted file key that was used to encrypt the data portion of the secured document.
4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the portion of the secured document being encrypted by the public key associated with the external user comprises at least some of the security information portion.
5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the external user is in a partner relationship with the organization, and wherein the obtaining is controlled by the partner relationship.
6. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising:
subsequently receiving the secured document at a computing device associated with the external user;
retrieving a private key associated with the external user;
decrypting at least a portion of the secured document using the private key associated with the external user; and
evaluating document level security imposed by the access control restrictions to determine whether the external user gains access to an unsecured version of the secured document.
7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein obtaining the public key comprises:
determining whether the internal user is permitted to receive the public key of the external user; and
obtaining the public key associated with the external user in response to determining that the internal user is permitted to receive the public key of the external user.
8. A method for releasing a secured document to a user affiliated with an organization, the method comprising:
receiving, at a document security system associated with the organization, a request from an external user unaffiliated with the organization to release a secured document including a security information portion and a data portion to a user affiliated with the organization, wherein the security information portion includes a file key and access control restrictions pertaining to the data portion;
receiving a public key associated with the user of the document security system over a data network;
in response to receiving the request:
authenticating that the received public key originated from the document security system over the data network;
encrypting, using the file key from the security information portion, the data portion of the secured document;
encrypting, using the received public key, the security information portion of the secured document, including the file key;
imposing the access control restrictions by including access rules in the security information portion, wherein the access rules are defined in a markup language and limit a type, a location, a duration, and an extent of access that the user affiliated with the organization is granted with respect to the secured document, the location of access being one of within the organization or outside of the organization; and
releasing the secured document including the encrypted file key to the user of the document security system.
9. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the authenticating relies on a certificate received with the received public key.
10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the user of the document security system is a member of the organization.
11. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein the certificate is associated with the organization.
12. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the external user is in a partner relationship with the organization.
13. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the releasing of the secured document and the file key to the user of the document security system comprises transmitting the secured document and the file key to the internal user via the data network.
14. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein the data network includes at least a part of the Internet.
15. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the encrypting operates to encrypt a header of the secured document, the header comprising the file key and wherein the releasing provides the file key within the header of the secured document.
16. The method as recited in claim 15, wherein the header of the secured document is encrypted with the received public key.
17. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the document security system comprises at least a key store that stores at least public keys for users of the document security system, and wherein the receiving of the public key associated with the user of the document security system comprises receiving the public key associated with the user of the document security system from the key store.
18. A non-transitory tangible computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon in a document security system, the instructions comprising:
instructions to receive a request from a first user affiliated with an organization to release a secured document including a security information portion and a data portion from the document security system, to an external user unaffiliated with the organization, wherein the document security system is associated with the organization, and wherein the security information portion includes a file key and access control restrictions pertaining to the data portion;
instructions to, in response to receiving the request:
obtain a public key associated with the external user;
encrypt, using the file key from the security information portion, the data portion of the secured document;
encrypt the security information portion of the secured document, including the file key, using the public key associated with the external user;
impose the access control restrictions by including access rules in the security information portion, wherein the access rules are defined in a markup language and limit a type, a location, and an extent of access that the external user is granted with respect to the secured document, the location of access being one of within the ornanization or outside of the organization; and
release the secured document including the encrypted file key to the external user.
19. The non-transitory tangible computer readable medium as recited in claim 18, wherein the document security system comprises at least a key store that stores at least public keys for the external user, and
wherein the obtaining further comprises obtaining the public key from the key store.
20. The non-transitory tangible computer readable medium as recited in claim 18, wherein the instructions to obtain further comprise instructions to obtain the public key associated with the external user from the document security system over a data network.
21. The non-transitory tangible computer readable medium as recited in claim 20, wherein the instructions further comprise:
instructions to authenticate that the public key originated from the document security system and was provided to the external user over the data network.
22. The non-transitory tangible computer readable medium as recited in claim 20, wherein the instructions to obtain further comprise instructions to retrieve the public key associated with the external user from a key store within the document security system.
23. The non-transitory tangible computer readable medium as recited in claim 18, wherein the portion of the secured document being encrypted by the public key comprises at least some of the security information portion.
Patent Citations (687)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4203166(A) | 1980-05-01 | Eshram et al. | Applicant |
| US4238854(A) | 1980-12-01 | Ehrsam et al. | Applicant |
| US4423387(A) | 1983-12-01 | Sempel | Applicant |
| US4734568(A) | 1988-03-01 | Watanabe | Applicant |
| US4757533(A) | 1988-07-01 | Allen et al. | Applicant |
| US4796220(A) | 1989-01-01 | Wolfe | Applicant |
| US4799258(A) | 1989-01-01 | Davies | Applicant |
| US4827508(A) | 1989-05-01 | Shear | Applicant |
| US4887204(A) | 1989-12-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US4888800(A) | 1989-12-01 | Marshall et al. | Applicant |
| US4912552(A) | 1990-03-01 | Allison et al. | Applicant |
| US4972472(A) | 1990-11-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US5032979(A) | 1991-07-01 | Hecht et al. | Applicant |
| US5052040(A) | 1991-09-01 | Preston et al. | Applicant |
| US5058164(A) | 1991-10-01 | Elmer et al. | Applicant |
| US5144660(A) | 1992-09-01 | Rose | Applicant |
| US5204897(A) | 1993-04-01 | Wyman | Applicant |
| US5212788(A) | 1993-05-01 | Lomet et al. | Applicant |
| US5220657(A) | 1993-06-01 | Bly et al. | Applicant |
| US5235641(A) | 1993-08-01 | Nozawa et al. | Applicant |
| US5247575(A) | 1993-09-01 | Sprague et al. | Applicant |
| US5267313(A) | 1993-11-01 | Hirata | Applicant |
| US5276735(A) | 1994-01-01 | Boebert et al. | Applicant |
| US5301247(A) | 1994-04-01 | Rasmussen et al. | Applicant |
| US5319705(A) | 1994-06-01 | Halter et al. | Applicant |
| US5369702(A) | 1994-11-01 | Shanton | Applicant |
| US5375169(A) | 1994-12-01 | Seheidt et al. | Applicant |
| US5404404(A) | 1995-04-01 | Novorita | Applicant |
| US5406628(A) | 1995-04-01 | Beller et al. | Applicant |
| US5414852(A) | 1995-05-01 | Kramer et al. | Applicant |
| US5434918(A) | 1995-07-01 | Kung et al. | Applicant |
| US5461710(A) | 1995-10-01 | Bloomfield et al. | Applicant |
| US5467342(A) | 1995-11-01 | Logston et al. | Applicant |
| US5495533(A) | 1996-02-01 | Linehan et al. | Applicant |
| US5497422(A) | 1996-03-01 | Tysen et al. | Examiner |
| US5499297(A) | 1996-03-01 | Boebert | Applicant |
| US5502766(A) | 1996-03-01 | Boebert et al. | Applicant |
| US5535375(A) | 1996-07-01 | Eshel et al. | Applicant |
| US5557765(A) | 1996-09-01 | Lipner et al. | Applicant |
| US5570108(A) | 1996-10-01 | McLaughlin et al. | Applicant |
| US5584023(A) | 1996-12-01 | Hsu | Applicant |
| US5600722(A) | 1997-02-01 | Yamaguchi et al. | Applicant |
| US5606663(A) | 1997-02-01 | Kadooka | Applicant |
| US5619576(A) | 1997-04-01 | Shaw | Applicant |
| US5638501(A) | 1997-06-01 | Gough et al. | Applicant |
| US5640388(A) | 1997-06-01 | Woodhead et al. | Applicant |
| US5655119(A) | 1997-08-01 | Davy | Applicant |
| US5661668(A) | 1997-08-01 | Yemini et al. | Applicant |
| US5661806(A) | 1997-08-01 | Nevoux et al. | Applicant |
| US5671412(A) | 1997-09-01 | Christiano | Applicant |
| US5673316(A) | 1997-09-01 | Auerbach et al. | Applicant |
| US5677953(A) | 1997-10-01 | Dolphin | Applicant |
| US5680452(A) | 1997-10-01 | Shanton | Applicant |
| US5682537(A) | 1997-10-01 | Davies et al. | Applicant |
| US5684987(A) | 1997-11-01 | Mamiya et al. | Applicant |
| US5689688(A) | 1997-11-01 | Strong et al. | Applicant |
| US5689718(A) | 1997-11-01 | Sakurai et al. | Applicant |
| US5693652(A) | 1997-12-01 | Barrus et al. | Applicant |
| US5699428(A) | 1997-12-01 | McDonnal et al. | Applicant |
| US5708709(A) | 1998-01-01 | Rose | Applicant |
| US5715403(A) | 1998-02-01 | Stefik | Applicant |
| US5717755(A) | 1998-02-01 | Shanton | Applicant |
| US5719941(A) | 1998-02-01 | Swift et al. | Applicant |
| US5720033(A) | 1998-02-01 | Deo | Applicant |
| US5721780(A) | 1998-02-01 | Ensor et al. | Examiner |
| US5729734(A) | 1998-03-01 | Parker et al. | Applicant |
| US5732265(A) | 1998-03-01 | Dewitt et al. | Applicant |
| US5745573(A) | 1998-04-01 | Lipner et al. | Applicant |
| US5745750(A) | 1998-04-01 | Porcaro | Applicant |
| US5748736(A) | 1998-05-01 | Mittra | Applicant |
| US5751287(A) | 1998-05-01 | Hahn et al. | Applicant |
| US5757920(A) | 1998-05-01 | Misra et al. | Applicant |
| US5765152(A) | 1998-06-01 | Ericson | Applicant |
| US5768381(A) | 1998-06-01 | Hawthorne | Applicant |
| US5778065(A) | 1998-07-01 | Hauser et al. | Applicant |
| US5778350(A) | 1998-07-01 | Adams et al. | Applicant |
| US5781711(A) | 1998-07-01 | Austin et al. | Applicant |
| US5787169(A) | 1998-07-01 | Eldridge et al. | Applicant |
| US5787173(A) | 1998-07-01 | Seheidt et al. | Applicant |
| US5787175(A) | 1998-07-01 | Carter | Applicant |
| US5790789(A) | 1998-08-01 | Suarez | Applicant |
| US5790790(A) | 1998-08-01 | Smith et al. | Examiner |
| US5813009(A) | 1998-09-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US5821933(A) | 1998-10-01 | Keller et al. | Applicant |
| US5825876(A) | 1998-10-01 | Peterson | Applicant |
| US5835592(A) | 1998-11-01 | Chang et al. | Applicant |
| US5835601(A) | 1998-11-01 | Shimbo et al. | Applicant |
| US5850443(A) | 1998-12-01 | Van Oorschot et al. | Applicant |
| US5857189(A) | 1999-01-01 | Riddle | Applicant |
| US5862325(A) | 1999-01-01 | Reed et al. | Applicant |
| US5870468(A) | 1999-02-01 | Harrison | Applicant |
| US5870477(A) | 1999-02-01 | Sasaki et al. | Applicant |
| US5881287(A) | 1999-03-01 | Mast | Applicant |
| US5892900(A) | 1999-04-01 | Ginter et al. | Applicant |
| US5893084(A) | 1999-04-01 | Morgan et al. | Applicant |
| US5898781(A) | 1999-04-01 | Shanton | Applicant |
| US5922073(A) | 1999-07-01 | Shimada | Applicant |
| US5923754(A) | 1999-07-01 | Angelo et al. | Applicant |
| US5933498(A) | 1999-08-01 | Schneck et al. | Applicant |
| US5944794(A) | 1999-08-01 | Okamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US5953419(A) | 1999-09-01 | Lohstroh et al. | Applicant |
| US5968177(A) | 1999-10-01 | Batten-Carew et al. | Applicant |
| US5970502(A) | 1999-10-01 | Salkewicz et al. | Applicant |
| US5978802(A) | 1999-11-01 | Hurvig | Applicant |
| US5987440(A) | 1999-11-01 | O'Neil et al. | Applicant |
| US5991879(A) | 1999-11-01 | Still | Applicant |
| US5999907(A) | 1999-12-01 | Donner | Applicant |
| US6011847(A) | 2000-01-01 | Follendore, III | Applicant |
| US6014730(A) | 2000-01-01 | Ohtsu | Applicant |
| US6023506(A) | 2000-02-01 | Ote et al. | Applicant |
| US6031584(A) | 2000-02-01 | Gray | Applicant |
| US6032216(A) | 2000-02-01 | Schmuck et al. | Applicant |
| US6035404(A) | 2000-03-01 | Zhao | Applicant |
| US6038322(A) | 2000-03-01 | Harkins | Applicant |
| US6044155(A) | 2000-03-01 | Thomlinson et al. | Applicant |
| US6055314(A) | 2000-04-01 | Spies et al. | Applicant |
| US6058424(A) | 2000-05-01 | Dixon et al. | Applicant |
| US6061790(A) | 2000-05-01 | Bodnar | Applicant |
| US6069957(A) | 2000-05-01 | Richards | Applicant |
| US6070244(A) | 2000-05-01 | Orchier et al. | Applicant |
| US6085323(A) | 2000-07-01 | Shimizu et al. | Applicant |
| US6088717(A) | 2000-07-01 | Reed et al. | Applicant |
| US6088805(A) | 2000-07-01 | Davis et al. | Examiner |
| US6098056(A) | 2000-08-01 | Rusnak et al. | Applicant |
| US6101507(A) | 2000-08-01 | Cane et al. | Applicant |
| US6105131(A) | 2000-08-01 | Carroll | Applicant |
| US6122630(A) | 2000-09-01 | Strickler et al. | Applicant |
| US6134327(A) | 2000-10-01 | Van Oorschot | Applicant |
| US6134658(A) | 2000-10-01 | Multerer et al. | Applicant |
| US6134660(A) | 2000-10-01 | Boneh et al. | Applicant |
| US6134664(A) | 2000-10-01 | Walker | Applicant |
| US6141754(A) | 2000-10-01 | Choy | Applicant |
| US6145084(A) | 2000-11-01 | Zuili et al. | Applicant |
| US6148338(A) | 2000-11-01 | Lachelt et al. | Applicant |
| US6158010(A) | 2000-12-01 | Moriconi et al. | Applicant |
| US6161139(A) | 2000-12-01 | Win et al. | Applicant |
| US6182142(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Win et al. | Applicant |
| US6185684(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Pravetz et al. | Applicant |
| US6192408(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Vahalia et al. | Applicant |
| US6199070(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Polo-Wood et al. | Applicant |
| US6205549(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Pravetz et al. | Applicant |
| US6212561(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Sitaraman et al. | Applicant |
| US6223285(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Komuro et al. | Applicant |
| US6226618(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Downs et al. | Applicant |
| US6226745(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Wiederhold | Applicant |
| US6240188(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Dondeti et al. | Applicant |
| US6249755(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Yemini et al. | Applicant |
| US6249873(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Richard et al. | Examiner |
| US6253193(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Ginter et al. | Applicant |
| US6260040(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Kauffman et al. | Applicant |
| US6260141(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Park | Applicant |
| US6263348(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Kathrow et al. | Applicant |
| US6266420(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Langford et al. | Applicant |
| US6272631(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Thomlinson et al. | Applicant |
| US6272632(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Carmen et al. | Applicant |
| US6282649(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Lambert et al. | Applicant |
| US6289450(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Pensak et al. | Applicant |
| US6289458(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Garg et al. | Applicant |
| US6292895(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Baltzley | Applicant |
| US6292899(B1) | 2001-09-01 | McBride | Applicant |
| US6295361(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Kadansky et al. | Applicant |
| US6299069(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Shona | Applicant |
| US6301614(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Najork et al. | Applicant |
| US6308256(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Folmsbee | Applicant |
| US6308273(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Goertzel et al. | Applicant |
| US6314408(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Salas et al. | Applicant |
| US6314409(B2) | 2001-11-01 | Schneck et al. | Applicant |
| US6317777(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Skarbo et al. | Applicant |
| US6332025(B2) | 2001-12-01 | Takahashi et al. | Applicant |
| US6336114(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Garrison | Applicant |
| US6339423(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Sampson et al. | Applicant |
| US6339825(B2) | 2002-01-01 | Pensak et al. | Applicant |
| US6341164(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Dilkie et al. | Applicant |
| US6343316(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Sakata | Applicant |
| US6347374(B1) | 2002-02-01 | Drake et al. | Applicant |
| US6349337(B1) | 2002-02-01 | Parsons, Jr. | Applicant |
| US6351813(B1) | 2002-02-01 | Mooney et al. | Applicant |
| US6356903(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Baxter et al. | Applicant |
| US6356941(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Cohen | Applicant |
| US6357010(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Viets et al. | Examiner |
| US6363480(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Perlman | Applicant |
| US6370249(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Van Oorschot | Applicant |
| US6381698(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Devanbu et al. | Applicant |
| US6385644(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Devine et al. | Applicant |
| US6389433(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Bolosky et al. | Applicant |
| US6389538(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Gruse et al. | Applicant |
| US6393420(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Peters | Applicant |
| US6405315(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Burns et al. | Applicant |
| US6405318(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Rowland | Applicant |
| US6408404(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Ladwig | Applicant |
| US6421714(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Rai et al. | Applicant |
| US6442688(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Moses et al. | Applicant |
| US6442695(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Dutcher et al. | Applicant |
| US6446090(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Hart | Applicant |
| US6449721(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Pensak et al. | Applicant |
| US6453353(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Win et al. | Applicant |
| US6453419(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Flint et al. | Applicant |
| US6466476(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Wong et al. | Applicant |
| US6466932(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Dennis et al. | Applicant |
| US6476833(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Moshfeghi | Examiner |
| US6477544(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Bolosky et al. | Applicant |
| US6487662(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Kharon et al. | Applicant |
| US6490680(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Scheidt et al. | Applicant |
| US6505300(B2) | 2003-01-01 | Chan et al. | Applicant |
| US6510349(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Schneck et al. | Applicant |
| US6519700(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Ram et al. | Applicant |
| US6529956(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Smith et al. | Examiner |
| US6530020(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Aoki | Applicant |
| US6530024(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Proctor | Applicant |
| US6542608(B2) | 2003-04-01 | Scheidt et al. | Applicant |
| US6549623(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Scheidt et al. | Applicant |
| US6550011(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Sims | Applicant |
| US6557039(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Leong et al. | Applicant |
| US6567914(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Just et al. | Applicant |
| US6571291(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Chow | Applicant |
| US6574733(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Langford | Examiner |
| US6584466(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Serbinis et al. | Applicant |
| US6587946(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Jakobsson | Examiner |
| US6588673(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Chan et al. | Applicant |
| US6594662(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Sieffert et al. | Applicant |
| US6598161(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Kluttz et al. | Applicant |
| US6601170(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Wallace, Jr. | Applicant |
| US6603857(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Batten-Carew et al. | Applicant |
| US6608636(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Roseman | Applicant |
| US6611599(B2) | 2003-08-01 | Natarajan | Applicant |
| US6611846(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Stoodley | Applicant |
| US6615349(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Hair | Examiner |
| US6615350(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Schell et al. | Applicant |
| US6625650(B2) | 2003-09-01 | Stelliga | Applicant |
| US6625734(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Marvit et al. | Applicant |
| US6629243(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Kleinman et al. | Applicant |
| US6633311(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Douvikas et al. | Applicant |
| US6640307(B2) | 2003-10-01 | Viets et al. | Applicant |
| US6646515(B2) | 2003-11-01 | Jun et al. | Applicant |
| US6647388(B2) | 2003-11-01 | Numao et al. | Applicant |
| US6678835(B1) | 2004-01-01 | Shah et al. | Applicant |
| US6683954(B1) | 2004-01-01 | Searle | Applicant |
| US6687822(B1) | 2004-02-01 | Jakobsson | Examiner |
| US6698022(B1) | 2004-02-01 | Wu | Applicant |
| US6711683(B1) | 2004-03-01 | Laczko et al. | Applicant |
| US6718361(B1) | 2004-04-01 | Basani et al. | Applicant |
| US6735701(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Jacobson | Applicant |
| US6738908(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Bonn et al. | Applicant |
| US6751573(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Burch | Applicant |
| US6754657(B2) | 2004-06-01 | Lomet | Applicant |
| US6754665(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Futagami et al. | Applicant |
| US6775779(B1) | 2004-08-01 | England et al. | Applicant |
| US6779031(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Picher-Dempsey | Applicant |
| US6782403(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Kino et al. | Applicant |
| US6801999(B1) | 2004-10-01 | Vankatesan et al. | Applicant |
| US6807534(B1) | 2004-10-01 | Erickson | Applicant |
| US6807636(B2) | 2004-10-01 | Hartman et al. | Applicant |
| US6810389(B1) | 2004-10-01 | Meyer | Applicant |
| US6810479(B1) | 2004-10-01 | Barlow et al. | Applicant |
| US6816871(B2) | 2004-11-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US6816969(B2) | 2004-11-01 | Miyazaki et al. | Applicant |
| US6826698(B1) | 2004-11-01 | Minkin et al. | Applicant |
| US6834333(B2) | 2004-12-01 | Yoshino et al. | Applicant |
| US6834341(B1) | 2004-12-01 | Bahl et al. | Applicant |
| US6842825(B2) | 2005-01-01 | Geiner et al. | Applicant |
| US6845452(B1) | 2005-01-01 | Roddy et al. | Examiner |
| US6851050(B2) | 2005-02-01 | Singhal et al. | Applicant |
| US6862103(B1) | 2005-03-01 | Miura et al. | Applicant |
| US6865555(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Novak | Applicant |
| US6870920(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Henits | Applicant |
| US6874139(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Krueger et al. | Applicant |
| US6877010(B2) | 2005-04-01 | Smith-Semedo et al. | Applicant |
| US6877136(B2) | 2005-04-01 | Bess et al. | Examiner |
| US6882994(B2) | 2005-04-01 | Yoshimura et al. | Applicant |
| US6889210(B1) | 2005-05-01 | Vainstein | Applicant |
| US6891953(B1) | 2005-05-01 | DeMello et al. | Applicant |
| US6892201(B2) | 2005-05-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US6892306(B1) | 2005-05-01 | En-Seung et al. | Applicant |
| US6898627(B1) | 2005-05-01 | Sekiguchi | Examiner |
| US6907034(B1) | 2005-06-01 | Begis | Applicant |
| US6909708(B1) | 2005-06-01 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Applicant |
| US6915425(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Xu et al. | Applicant |
| US6915434(B1) | 2005-07-01 | Kuroda et al. | Applicant |
| US6915435(B1) | 2005-07-01 | Merriam | Applicant |
| US6920558(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Sames et al. | Applicant |
| US6922785(B1) | 2005-07-01 | Brewer et al. | Applicant |
| US6924425(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Naples et al. | Applicant |
| US6931450(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Howard et al. | Applicant |
| US6931530(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Pham et al. | Applicant |
| US6931597(B1) | 2005-08-01 | Prakash | Applicant |
| US6938042(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Aboulhosn et al. | Applicant |
| US6938156(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Wheeler et al. | Applicant |
| US6941355(B1) | 2005-09-01 | Donaghey et al. | Applicant |
| US6941456(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Wilson | Applicant |
| US6941472(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Moriconi et al. | Applicant |
| US6944183(B1) | 2005-09-01 | Iyer et al. | Applicant |
| US6947556(B1) | 2005-09-01 | Matyas, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US6950818(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Dennis et al. | Applicant |
| US6950936(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Subramaniam et al. | Applicant |
| US6950941(B1) | 2005-09-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US6950943(B1) | 2005-09-01 | Bacha et al. | Examiner |
| US6952780(B2) | 2005-10-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US6957261(B2) | 2005-10-01 | Lortz | Applicant |
| US6959308(B2) | 2005-10-01 | Gramsamer et al. | Applicant |
| US6961849(B1) | 2005-11-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US6961855(B1) | 2005-11-01 | Rich et al. | Applicant |
| US6968060(B1) | 2005-11-01 | Pinkas | Applicant |
| US6968456(B1) | 2005-11-01 | Tripathi et al. | Applicant |
| US6971018(B1) | 2005-11-01 | Witt et al. | Applicant |
| US6976259(B1) | 2005-12-01 | Dutta et al. | Applicant |
| US6978366(B1) | 2005-12-01 | Ignatchenko et al. | Applicant |
| US6978376(B2) | 2005-12-01 | Giroux et al. | Applicant |
| US6978377(B1) | 2005-12-01 | Asano et al. | Applicant |
| US6987752(B1) | 2006-01-01 | Falco et al. | Applicant |
| US6988133(B1) | 2006-01-01 | Zavalkovsky et al. | Applicant |
| US6988199(B2) | 2006-01-01 | Toh et al. | Examiner |
| US6993135(B2) | 2006-01-01 | Ishibashi | Applicant |
| US6996718(B1) | 2006-02-01 | Henry et al. | Applicant |
| US7000150(B1) | 2006-02-01 | Zunino et al. | Applicant |
| US7003116(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Riedel et al. | Applicant |
| US7003117(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Kacker et al. | Applicant |
| US7003560(B1) | 2006-02-01 | Mullen et al. | Applicant |
| US7003661(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Beattie et al. | Examiner |
| US7010689(B1) | 2006-03-01 | Matyas et al. | Examiner |
| US7010809(B2) | 2006-03-01 | Hori et al. | Applicant |
| US7013332(B2) | 2006-03-01 | Friedel et al. | Applicant |
| US7013485(B2) | 2006-03-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US7020645(B2) | 2006-03-01 | Bisbee et al. | Applicant |
| US7024427(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Bobbitt et al. | Applicant |
| US7035854(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Hsiao et al. | Applicant |
| US7035910(B1) | 2006-04-01 | Dutta et al. | Examiner |
| US7043637(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Bolosky et al. | Applicant |
| US7046807(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Hirano et al. | Applicant |
| US7047404(B1) | 2006-05-01 | Doonan et al. | Applicant |
| US7051213(B1) | 2006-05-01 | Kobayashi et al. | Applicant |
| US7058696(B1) | 2006-06-01 | Phillips et al. | Applicant |
| US7058978(B2) | 2006-06-01 | Feuerstein et al. | Applicant |
| US7073063(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Peinado | Applicant |
| US7073073(B1) | 2006-07-01 | Nonaka et al. | Applicant |
| US7076067(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Raike et al. | Applicant |
| US7076312(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Law et al. | Applicant |
| US7076469(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Schreiber et al. | Applicant |
| US7076633(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Tormasov et al. | Applicant |
| US7080077(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Ramamurthy et al. | Applicant |
| US7095853(B2) | 2006-08-01 | Morishita | Applicant |
| US7096266(B2) | 2006-08-01 | Lewin et al. | Examiner |
| US7099926(B1) | 2006-08-01 | Ims et al. | Applicant |
| US113594(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Boneh et al. | Applicant |
| US7103911(B2) | 2006-09-01 | Spies et al. | Applicant |
| US7107185(B1) | 2006-09-01 | Yemini et al. | Applicant |
| US7107269(B2) | 2006-09-01 | Arlein et al. | Applicant |
| US7107416(B2) | 2006-09-01 | Stuart et al. | Applicant |
| US7116785(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Okaue | Applicant |
| US7117322(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Hochberg et al. | Applicant |
| US7120635(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Bhide et al. | Applicant |
| US7120757(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Tsuge | Applicant |
| US7120935(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Serani et al. | Examiner |
| US7124164(B1) | 2006-10-01 | Chemtob | Applicant |
| US7126957(B1) | 2006-10-01 | Isukapalli et al. | Applicant |
| US7130964(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Ims et al. | Applicant |
| US7131071(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Gune et al. | Applicant |
| US7134041(B2) | 2006-11-01 | Murray et al. | Applicant |
| US7136903(B1) | 2006-11-01 | Phillips et al. | Applicant |
| US7139399(B1) | 2006-11-01 | Zimmermann | Examiner |
| US7140044(B2) | 2006-11-01 | Redlich et al. | Applicant |
| US7145898(B1) | 2006-12-01 | Elliott | Applicant |
| US7146388(B2) | 2006-12-01 | Stakutis et al. | Applicant |
| US7146498(B1) | 2006-12-01 | Takechi et al. | Applicant |
| US7159036(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Hinchliffe et al. | Applicant |
| US7168094(B1) | 2007-01-01 | Fredell | Examiner |
| US7171557(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Kallahalla et al. | Applicant |
| US7174563(B1) | 2007-02-01 | Brownlie et al. | Applicant |
| US7177427(B1) | 2007-02-01 | Komuro et al. | Applicant |
| US7177839(B1) | 2007-02-01 | Claxton et al. | Applicant |
| US7178033(B1) | 2007-02-01 | Garcia | Applicant |
| US7181017(B1) | 2007-02-01 | Nagel et al. | Applicant |
| US7185364(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Knouse et al. | Applicant |
| US7187033(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Pendharkar | Applicant |
| US7188181(B1) | 2007-03-01 | Squier et al. | Applicant |
| US7194764(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Martherus et al. | Examiner |
| US7197638(B1) | 2007-03-01 | Grawrock et al. | Applicant |
| US7200747(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Riedel et al. | Applicant |
| US7203317(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Kallahalla et al. | Applicant |
| US7203968(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Asano et al. | Applicant |
| US7219230(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Riedel et al. | Applicant |
| US7224795(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Takada et al. | Applicant |
| US7225256(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Villavicencio | Applicant |
| US7227953(B2) | 2007-06-01 | Shida | Applicant |
| US7233948(B1) | 2007-06-01 | Shamoon et al. | Applicant |
| US7237002(B1) | 2007-06-01 | Estrada et al. | Applicant |
| US7249044(B2) | 2007-07-01 | Kumar et al. | Applicant |
| US7249251(B2) | 2007-07-01 | Todd et al. | Applicant |
| US7260555(B2) | 2007-08-01 | Rossmann et al. | Applicant |
| US7265764(B2) | 2007-09-01 | Alben et al. | Applicant |
| US7266684(B2) | 2007-09-01 | Jancula | Applicant |
| US7280658(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Amini et al. | Applicant |
| US7281272(B1) | 2007-10-01 | Rubin et al. | Applicant |
| US7287055(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Cannata et al. | Applicant |
| US7287058(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Loveland et al. | Examiner |
| US7290148(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Tozawa et al. | Applicant |
| US7308702(B1) | 2007-12-01 | Thomsen et al. | Applicant |
| US7313824(B1) | 2007-12-01 | Bala et al. | Applicant |
| US7319752(B2) | 2008-01-01 | Asano et al. | Applicant |
| US7340600(B1) | 2008-03-01 | Corella | Applicant |
| US7343488(B2) | 2008-03-01 | Yadav | Applicant |
| US7359517(B1) | 2008-04-01 | Rowe | Applicant |
| US7362868(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Madoukh et al. | Applicant |
| US7380120(B1) | 2008-05-01 | Garcia | Applicant |
| US7383586(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Cross et al. | Applicant |
| US7386529(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Kiessig et al. | Applicant |
| US7386599(B1) | 2008-06-01 | Piersol et al. | Examiner |
| US7401220(B2) | 2008-07-01 | Bolosky et al. | Applicant |
| US7406596(B2) | 2008-07-01 | Tararukhina et al. | Applicant |
| US7415608(B2) | 2008-08-01 | Bolosky et al. | Applicant |
| US7434048(B1) | 2008-10-01 | Shapiro et al. | Applicant |
| US7454612(B2) | 2008-11-01 | Bolosky et al. | Applicant |
| US7461157(B2) | 2008-12-01 | Ahlard et al. | Applicant |
| US7461405(B2) | 2008-12-01 | Boudreault et al. | Applicant |
| US7478243(B2) | 2009-01-01 | Bolosky et al. | Applicant |
| US7478418(B2) | 2009-01-01 | Supramaniam et al. | Applicant |
| US7484245(B1) | 2009-01-01 | Friedman et al. | Applicant |
| US7496959(B2) | 2009-02-01 | Adelstein et al. | Applicant |
| US7509492(B2) | 2009-03-01 | Boyen et al. | Applicant |
| US7512810(B1) | 2009-03-01 | Ryan | Applicant |
| US7539867(B2) | 2009-05-01 | Bolosky et al. | Applicant |
| US7555558(B1) | 2009-06-01 | Kenrich et al. | Applicant |
| US7562223(B2) | 2009-07-01 | Ragnet et al. | Examiner |
| US7562232(B2) | 2009-07-01 | Zuili et al. | Applicant |
| US7565683(B1) | 2009-07-01 | Huang et al. | Examiner |
| US7614077(B2) | 2009-11-01 | Brew et al. | Examiner |
| US7631184(B2) | 2009-12-01 | Ryan | Applicant |
| US7681034(B1) | 2010-03-01 | Lee et al. | Examiner |
| US7698230(B1) | 2010-04-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US7702909(B2) | 2010-04-01 | Vainstein | Applicant |
| US7703140(B2) | 2010-04-01 | Nath et al. | Applicant |
| US7707427(B1) | 2010-04-01 | Kenrich et al. | Applicant |
| US7729995(B1) | 2010-06-01 | Alain et al. | Applicant |
| US7730543(B1) | 2010-06-01 | Nath et al. | Applicant |
| US7748045(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Kenrich et al. | Applicant |
| US7921288(B1) | 2011-04-01 | Hildebrand | Examiner |
| US2001/0000265(A1) | 2001-04-01 | Schreiber et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0011254(A1) | 2001-08-01 | Clark | Applicant |
| US2001/0018743(A1) | 2001-08-01 | Morishita | Applicant |
| US2001/0021255(A1) | 2001-09-01 | Ishibashi | Applicant |
| US2001/0021926(A1) | 2001-09-01 | Schneck et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0023421(A1) | 2001-09-01 | Numao et al. | Examiner |
| US2001/0032181(A1) | 2001-10-01 | Jakstadt et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0033611(A1) | 2001-10-01 | Grimwood et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0034839(A1) | 2001-10-01 | Karjoth et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0042110(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Furusawa et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0044903(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Yamamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0056541(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Matsuzaki et al. | Examiner |
| US2001/0056550(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Lee | Examiner |
| US2002/0003886(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Hillegass et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0004902(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Toh et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0007335(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Millard et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0010679(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Felsher | Applicant |
| US2002/0013772(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Peinado | Applicant |
| US2002/0016921(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0016922(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Richards et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0023208(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Jancula | Applicant |
| US2002/0026321(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Faris et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0027886(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Fischer et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0029340(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Pensak et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0031230(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Sweet et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0035624(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Kim | Examiner |
| US2002/0036984(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Chiussi et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0041391(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Bannai | Applicant |
| US2002/0042756(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Kumar et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0046350(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Lordemann et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0050098(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Chan | Applicant |
| US2002/0052981(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Yasuda | Applicant |
| US2002/0056042(A1) | 2002-05-01 | van der Kaay et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0059144(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Meffert et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0062240(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Morinville | Applicant |
| US2002/0062245(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Niu et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0062451(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Scheidt et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0069077(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Brophy et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0069272(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Kim et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0069363(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Winburn | Applicant |
| US2002/0073320(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Rinkevich et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0077986(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Kobata et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0077988(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Sasaki et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0078239(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Howard et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0078361(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Giroux et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0087479(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Malcolm | Applicant |
| US2002/0091532(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Viets et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0091745(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Ramamurthy et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0091928(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Bouchard et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0093527(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Sherlock et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0099947(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Evans | Applicant |
| US2002/0112035(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Carey et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0120851(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Clarke | Applicant |
| US2002/0124180(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Hagman | Applicant |
| US2002/0129158(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Zhang et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0129235(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Okamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0133500(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Arlein et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0133699(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Pueschel | Applicant |
| US2002/0138571(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Trinon et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0138762(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Horne | Applicant |
| US2002/0143710(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Liu | Applicant |
| US2002/0143906(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Tormasov et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0150239(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Carny et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0152302(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Motoyama et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0156726(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Kleckner et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0157016(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Russell et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0162104(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Raike et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0165870(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Chakraborty et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0169963(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Seder et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0169965(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Hale et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0172367(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Mulder et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0174030(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Praisner et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0174109(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Chandy et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0174415(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Hines | Applicant |
| US2002/0176572(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Ananth | Applicant |
| US2002/0178271(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Graham et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0184488(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Amini et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0194484(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Bolosky et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0198798(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Ludwig et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0005168(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Leerssen et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0009685(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Choo et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0014391(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Evans et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0023559(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Choi et al. | Examiner |
| US2003/0026431(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Hammersmith | Applicant |
| US2003/0028610(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Pearson | Applicant |
| US2003/0033528(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Ozog et al. | Examiner |
| US2003/0037029(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Holenstein et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0037133(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Owens | Applicant |
| US2003/0037237(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Abgrall et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0037253(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Blank et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0046176(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Hynes | Applicant |
| US2003/0046238(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Nonaka et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0046270(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Leung et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0050919(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0051039(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0051148(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Garney | Examiner |
| US2003/0056139(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Murray et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0061482(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Emmerichs | Applicant |
| US2003/0061506(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Cooper | Applicant |
| US2003/0074580(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Knouse et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0078959(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Yeung et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0079175(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Limantsev | Applicant |
| US2003/0081784(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Kallahalla et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0081785(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Boneh et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0081787(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Kallahalla et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0081790(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Kallahalla et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0088517(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Medoff | Applicant |
| US2003/0088783(A1) | 2003-05-01 | DiPierro | Applicant |
| US2003/0093250(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Goebel | Examiner |
| US2003/0093457(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Goldick | Applicant |
| US2003/0093467(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Anderson | Examiner |
| US2003/0095552(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Bernhard et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0099248(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Speciner | Applicant |
| US2003/0101072(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Dick et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0110169(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Zuili | Applicant |
| US2003/0110266(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Rollins et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0110280(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Hinchliffe et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0110397(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Supramaniam et al. | Examiner |
| US2003/0115146(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0115218(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Bobbitt et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0115570(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Bisceglia | Applicant |
| US2003/0120601(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Ouye | Applicant |
| US2003/0120684(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Zuili et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0126434(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Lim et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0132949(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Fallon et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0154381(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Ouye | Applicant |
| US2003/0154396(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Godwin et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0154401(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Hartman et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0159048(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Matsumoto et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0159066(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Staw et al. | Examiner |
| US2003/0163704(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Dick et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0165117(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0172280(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Scheidt et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0177070(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Viswanath et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0177378(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Wittkotter | Applicant |
| US2003/0182310(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Charnock et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0182579(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Leporini et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0182584(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Banes et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0191938(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Woods et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0196096(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Sutton | Applicant |
| US2003/0197729(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Denoue et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0200202(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Hsiao et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0204692(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Tamer et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0208485(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Castellanos | Applicant |
| US2003/0217264(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Martin et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0217281(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Ryan | Applicant |
| US2003/0217333(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0220999(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Emerson | Applicant |
| US2003/0222141(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Vogler et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0226013(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Dutertre | Applicant |
| US2003/0233650(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Zaner et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0022390(A1) | 2004-02-01 | McDonald et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0025037(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Hair | Applicant |
| US2004/0039781(A1) | 2004-02-01 | LaVallee et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0041845(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Alben et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0049702(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Subramaniam et al. | Examiner |
| US2004/0064507(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Sakata | Applicant |
| US2004/0064710(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Vainstein | Applicant |
| US2004/0068524(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Aboulhosn et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0068664(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Nachenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0073660(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Toomey | Applicant |
| US2004/0073718(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Johannessen et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0088548(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Smetters et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0098580(A1) | 2004-05-01 | DeTreville | Applicant |
| US2004/0103202(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Hildebrand et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0103280(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Balfanz et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0131191(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Chen et al. | Examiner |
| US2004/0133544(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Kiessig et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0158586(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Tsai | Applicant |
| US2004/0186845(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Fukui | Applicant |
| US2004/0193602(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Liu et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0193905(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Lirov et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0193912(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0199514(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Rosenblatt et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0205576(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Chikirivao et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0215956(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Venkatachary et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0215962(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Douceur et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0243853(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Swander et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0254884(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Haber et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0021467(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Franzdonk | Applicant |
| US2005/0021629(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Cannata et al. | Examiner |
| US2005/0028006(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Leser et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0039034(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Doyle et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0050098(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Barnett | Applicant |
| US2005/0071275(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Vainstein et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0071657(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Ryan | Applicant |
| US2005/0071658(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Nath et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0081029(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Thornton et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0086531(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Kenrich | Applicant |
| US2005/0091289(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Shappell et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0091484(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Thornton et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0097061(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Shapiro et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0120199(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Carter | Applicant |
| US2005/0138371(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Supramaniam et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0138383(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Vainstein | Applicant |
| US2005/0168766(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Troyansky et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0177716(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Ginter et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0177858(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Ueda | Applicant |
| US2005/0193397(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Corenthin et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0198326(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Schlimmer et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0223242(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Nath | Applicant |
| US2005/0223414(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Kenrich et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0235154(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Serret-Avila | Applicant |
| US2005/0256909(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Aboulhosn et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0268033(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Ogasawara et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0273600(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Seeman | Applicant |
| US2005/0283610(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Serret-Avila et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0288961(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Tabrizi | Applicant |
| US2006/0005021(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Torrubia-Saez | Applicant |
| US2006/0075258(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Adamson et al. | Examiner |
| US2006/0075465(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Ramanathan et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0093150(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Reddy et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0101285(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0149407(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Markham et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0168147(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Inoue et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0184637(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Hultgren et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0230437(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Boyer et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0277316(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0006214(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Dubal et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0067837(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Schuster | Applicant |
| US2007/0083575(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Leung et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0192478(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Louie et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0294368(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Bomgaars et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0075126(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Yang | Applicant |
| US2009/0254843(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Van Wie et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0047757(A1) | 2010-02-01 | McCurry et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0199088(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Nath | Applicant |
| EP672991(A2) | 1995-09-01 | Applicant | |
| EP674253(A1) | 1995-09-01 | Applicant | |
| EP809170(A1) | 1997-11-01 | Applicant | |
| EP913966(A2) | 1999-05-01 | Applicant | |
| EP913967(A2) | 1999-05-01 | Applicant | |
| EP950941(A2) | 1999-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP950941(A3) | 1999-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1107504(A2) | 2001-06-01 | Applicant | |
| EPI107504(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1130492(A2) | 2001-09-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1154348(A2) | 2001-11-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1324565(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1324565(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Applicant | |
| GB2328047(A) | 1999-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2001-036517 | 2001-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2006-244044 | 2006-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2009-020720(A) | 2009-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO96/41288(A1) | 1996-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/56028(A2) | 2000-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/61438(A2) | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/63387(A2) | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/63387(A3) | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/77783(A2) | 2001-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/78285(A1) | 2001-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/84271(A2) | 2001-11-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (79)
- “Secure Sockets Layer (SSL): How It Works”; Verisign; “http://www.verisign.com/ssl/ssl-information-center/how-ssl-security-works”; pp. 1-2.Examiner
- Walt Curtis, Lori Sinton; “Securing the Global, Remote, Mobile User”; 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; Int. J. Network Mgmt. 9, 9-21 (1999); pp. 9-21.Examiner
- Defintion of markup, in FOLDOC (Free On Line Dictionary of Computing).Examiner
- “Inside Encrypting File System,” Part 1, from MSDN Oct. 2001 version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.Applicant
- “Inside Encrypting File System,” Part 2, from MSDN Oct. 2001 version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.Applicant
- “Security with Encrypting File System,” from MSDN Oct. 2001 version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.Applicant
- “How EFS Works,” from MSDN Oct. 2001 version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.Applicant
- “Encrypting File System,” from MSDN Oct. 2001 version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.Applicant
- “Features of EFS,” from MSDN Oct. 2001 version, exact publication date is unknown but believed prior to Dec. 12, 2001.Applicant
- “Windows 2000 EFS,” in the Apr. 1999 issue of Windows NT Magazine.Applicant
- Expiration Mechanism for Chipcards, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Oct. 1, 2001, UK.Applicant
- McDaniel et al. “Antigone: A Flexible Framework for Secure Group Communication,” Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Security Symposium, Aug. 23, 1999.Applicant
- Stallings, William, “Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice,” 1999, pp. 333-337, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Applicant
- “Affect,” The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002. Retrieved May 4, 2006 from http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=affect.Applicant
- Microsoft Windows 200 server. Windows 2000 Group Policy White Paper, 2000.Applicant
- Symantec. Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition Implementation Guide, 1999.Applicant
- Crocker, Steven Toye, “Multi-level cryptographic transformations for securing digital assets, ”U.S. Appl. No. 10/404,566, filed Mar. 31, 2003.Applicant
- Crocker, Steven Toye, “Effectuating access policy changes to designated places for secured files,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/259,075, filed Sep. 27, 2002.Applicant
- Kenrich, Michael Frederick, “Multi-Level File Digest”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/894,493, filed Jul. 19, 2004.Applicant
- Kinghorn, Gary Mark, “Method and system for protecting electronic data in enterprise environment, ”U.S. Appl. No. 10/159,220, filed May 31, 2002.Applicant
- Nath, Satyajit, “Method and system for securing digital assets using content type designations,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/405,587, filed Apr. 1, 2003.Applicant
- Prakash, Nalini J., “Method and apparatus for securing/unsecuring files by file crawling,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,102, filed Dec. 20, 2002.Applicant
- Rossmann, Main, “Hybrid systems for securing digital assets,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,013, filed Dec. 20, 2002.Applicant
- A Real-Time Push-Pull Communications Model for Distributed Real-Time and Multimedia Systems, Jan. 1999, School of Computer Sciences Carnegie Mellon University, Kanaka Juvva, Raj Rajkumar.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/889,685, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Controlling the Speed Ranges of a Machine ” inventor Thomas, Jul. 13, 2004, 18 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/028,397, entitled “Method and system for restricting use of a clipboard application, ” inventor Zuili, Dec. 21, 2001, 38 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/368,277, entitled “Method and apparatus for uniquely identifying files, ” inventor Ouye, Feb. 18, 2003, 25 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/327,320, entitled “Security system with staging capabilities ” inventor Vainstein, Dec. 20, 2002, 39 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/286,524, entitled “Security system that uses indirect password-based encryption, ” inventor Gutnik, Nov. 1, 2002, 38 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/242,185, entitled “Method and system for protecting encrypted files transmitted over a network ” inventor Ryan, Sep. 11, 2002, 33 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,041, entitled “Method and system for fault-tolerant transfer of files across a network ” inventor Kenrich, Aug. 15, 2003, 32 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/610,832, entitled “Method and system for enabling users of a group shared across multiple file security systems to access secured files ” inventor Ryan, Jun. 30, 2003, 33 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/448,806, entitled “Method and System for Using Remote Headers to Secure Electronic Files ” inventor Ryan, May 30, 2003, 35 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/074,194, entitled “Methods for idnetifying compunds that inhibit or reduce PTPIB expressions” inventor Rondinone, Feb. 12, 2002, 69 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/074,804, entitled “Secured Data Format for Access Control,” inventor Garcia, Feb. 12, 2002, 108 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/075,194, entitled “System and Method for Providing Multilocation Access Management to Secured Items,” inventor Vainstein et al., Feb. 12, 2002, 110 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/074,996, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Securing Electronic Data,” inventor Lee et al., Feb. 12, 2002, 111 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/074,825, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Accessing Secured Electronic Data Off-line,” inventor Lee et al., Feb. 12, 2002, 108 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/105,532, entitled “System and Method for Providing Different Levels of Key Security for Controlling Access to Secured Items,” inventor Hildebrand et al., Mar. 20, 2002, 86 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/186,203, entitled “Method and System for Implementing Changes to Security Policies in a Distributed Security System,” inventor Huang, Jun. 26, 2002, 65 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/201,756, entitled “Managing Secured Files in Designated Locations,” inventor Main, Jul. 22, 2002, 121 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/206,737, entitled “Method and System for Updating Keys in a Distributed Security System,” inventor Hildebrand, Jul. 26, 2002, 60 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/246,079, entitled “Security System for Generating Keys from Access rules in a Decentralized Manner and Methods Therefor,” inventor Hildebrand, Sep. 17, 2002, 78 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/259,075, entitled “Effectuating Access Policy Changes to Designated Places for Secured Files,” inventor Crocker, Sep. 27, 2002, 60 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/286,575, entitled “Method and Architecture for Providing Access to Secured Data from Non-Secured Clients,” inventor Vainstein, Nov. 1, 2002, 46 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/295,363, entitled “Security System Using Indirect Key Generation from Access Rules and Methods Therefor,” inventor Vainstein, Nov. 15, 2002, 70 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/889,310, entitled “Methods and Systems for Providing Access Control to Electronic Data,” inventor Rossmann, Aug. 10, 2007, 90 pgs.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/797,367, entitled “Method and System for Managing Security Tiers,” inventor Vainstein, May 2, 2007, 11 pgs.Applicant
- Adobe Acrobat 5.0 Classroom in a Book, Adobe Press, Jun. 26, 2001, pp. 1-4.Applicant
- Adobe Acrobat Security Settings, Acrobat 7.0, Nov. 15, 2004, pp. 1-4.Applicant
- “Security Options”. Dec. 20, 2001. DC & Co. pp. 1-2.Applicant
- Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, 1997, Microsoft Press, Third Edition, p. 426.Applicant
- Search Report, completion date May 8, 2003, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8530, 2 pages.Applicant
- Search Report, completion date Oct. 2, 2003, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8531, 2 pages.Applicant
- Search Report, completion date Apr. 14, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8533, 2 pages.Applicant
- Search Report, completion date Mar. 16, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8534, 2 pages.Applicant
- Search Report, completion date Mar. 2, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8535, 2 pages.Applicant
- Search Report, completion date Mar. 3, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8537, 2 pages.Applicant
- Search Report, completion date May 12, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8539, 2 pages.Applicant
- Search Report, completion date Jul. 6, 2005, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8529, 4 pages.Applicant
- Search Report, completion date Oct. 8, 2003, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8536, 2 pages.Applicant
- Search Report, completion date May 8, 2003, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 25 8540, 2 pages.Applicant
- Examination Report, completion date Jun. 18, 2008, for European Patent Application No. EP 02 258 532.7-1244, 6 pgs.Applicant
- Office Action, dated May 10, 2005, for European Patent Application No. 02258532.7, 5 pgs.Applicant
- Boneh et al., “Hierarchical Identity Based Encryption with Constant Size Ciphertext,” Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2005, vol. 3493, Jun. 20, 2005, pp. 440-456.Applicant
- Boneh et al., “IBE Secure E-mail,” Stanford University, Apr. 8, 2002, http://crypto.stanford.edu/ibe/.Applicant
- “Column Archives,” Microsoft TechNet, Professor Windows, technet.microsoft.com/enus/library/bb878075.aspx, retrieved on Dec. 3, 2009.Applicant
- “Columns,” Microsoft TechNet, http://web.archive.org/web/20021014225142/www.microsoft.com/techneUcolumns/default.asp, Oct. 14, 2002, retrieved from web.archive.org on Dec. 3, 2009.Applicant
- “eXPeriencing Remote Assistance,” Microsoft TechNet, Professor Windows Oct. 2002, http://web.archive.org/web/20021015165237/www.microsoft.com/techneUcolumns/profwin/, retrieved from web.archive.org on Dec. 3, 2009.Applicant
- “Migrating Accounts From Windows NT 4.0 Domains to Windows 2000,” Microsoft TechNet—Professor Windows Apr. 2002, http://web.archive.org/web/20020415004611/www.microsoft.com/tech net/colu mns/profwin/, Apr. 15, 2002.Applicant
- “Scripting Your Windows 2000 Network, Part 1” Microsoft TechNet—Professor Windows Jun. 2002, http://web.archive.org/web/20020622055532/www.microsoft.com/techneUcolumns/profwin/ Retrieved from web.archive.org on Dec. 3, 2009.Applicant
- “WayBack Machine” web.archive.org, http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.microsoft.com/techneticolumns/profwin/, Retrieved on Dec. 3, 2009.Applicant
- English language translation (unverified, machine-generated) of Japanese Patent Publication No. JP 2006-244044, Japanese Patent Office, Patent & Utility Model Gazette DB, 2006.Applicant
- English language translation (unverified, machine-generated) of Japanese Patent Publication No. 2009-020720, Japanese Patent Office, Patent & Utility Model Gazette DB, 2009.Applicant
- Office Action, dated Oct. 5, 2005, for European Patent Application No. 02258532.7, 5 pgs.Applicant
- Office Action, dated Dec. 5, 2006, for European Patent Application No. 02258532.7, 5 pgs.Applicant
- English language abstract for Japanese Appl. No. 2001-036517, filed Feb. 9, 2001, 1 pg.Applicant
- Botha et al., “Access Control in Document-Centric Workflow Systems—An Agent-Based Approach,” Computers & Security, vol. 20:6, Sep. 2001, pp. 525-532.Applicant
- Botha et al., “Separation of Duties for Access Control Enforcement in Workflow Environments,” IBM, 2001.Applicant