US 8,076,386 B2Grant

Materials for imprint lithography

Issue Date:2011-12-13

•19 Claims

•3 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

The present invention is directed to a material for use in imprint lithography that features a composition having a viscosity associated therewith and including a surfactant, a polymerizable component, and an initiator responsive to a stimuli to vary the viscosity in response thereto, with the composition, in a liquid state, having the viscosity being lower than about 100 centipoises, a vapor pressure of less than about 20 Torr, and in a solid cured state a tensile modulus of greater than about 100 MPa, a break stress of greater than about 3 MPa and an elongation at break of greater than about 2%.

Metadata

Assignees

Molecular Imprints, Inc.
Board of Regents, The University of Texas

Inventors

Frank Y. Xu
Michael P. C. Watts
Nicholas A. Stacey

Application Information

Application Number:US 10/784,911

Filing Date:2004-02-23

Priority Date:2004-02-23

Art Unit:1762

Classifications

IPC:

C08J7/16C08J7/18C08K3/00C08K5/54C08K5/541

Patent Drawings (3 sheets)

Description

Technical Field of the Invention

[0001] One or more embodiments of the present invention relate generally to imprint lithography. In particular, one or more embodiments of the present invention relate to materials for imprint lithography.

Background of the Invention

[0002] Micro-fabrication involves the fabrication of very small structures, for example, and without limitation, structures having features on the order of micro-meters or smaller. One area in which micro-fabrication has had a sizeable impact is in processing of integrated circuits. As the semiconductor processing industry continues to strive for larger production yields while increasing the circuits per unit area formed on a substrate, micro-fabrication becomes increasingly important since micro-fabrication provides greater process control while allowing a reduction in the minimum feature dimension of the structures formed. Other areas of development in which micro-fabrication have been employed include biotechnology, optical technology, mechanical systems and the like.

[0003] An exemplary micro-fabrication technique is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,334,960 to Willson et al. In particular, the Willson et al. patent discloses a method of imprint lithography to form a relief pattern in a structure. The method includes providing a substrate having a transfer layer (typically spin-coated), and covering the transfer layer, in turn, with a low viscosity, polymerizable (typically UV curable) fluid composition (typically in the form of droplets). The method further includes mechanically contacting an imprint template or mold having a relief structure with the polymerizable fluid composition wherein the polymerizable fluid composition fills a gap between the imprint template and the substrate and fills the relief structure of the imprint template. Next, the method includes subjecting the polymerizable fluid composition to conditions to solidify and to polymerize the same (typically, exposing the polymerizable fluid composition to UV to crosslink it), thereby forming a solidified polymeric material on the transfer layer that contains a relief structure complimentary to that of the imprint template. Next, the method includes separating the imprint template from the substrate to leave solid polymeric material on the substrate, which solid polymeric material includes a relief pattern in the form of the complimentary relief structure. Next, the solidified polymeric material and the transfer layer are subjected to an environment to selectively etch the transfer layer relative to the solidified polymeric material to form a relief image in the transfer layer.

[0004] The following issues that relate to selective adhesion of the solidified polymeric material to different surfaces are typically considered when one develops a method and/or a material useful in forming fine-feature relief patterns in the solidified polymeric material. First, the solidified polymeric material ought to adhere well to the transfer layer on the substrate, and second, it ought to be easily released from the surface of the imprint template. These issues are typically referred to as release characteristics, and if they are satisfied, the relief pattern recorded in the solidified polymeric material will not be distorted during separation of the imprint template from the substrate.

[0005] In addition to the above-described release characteristics, when designing an imprinting material for use in imprint lithography, further considerations include: (a) low viscosity, for example, and without limitation, a viscosity, at 25° C., of 5 centipoise or less, to fast spread over both the substrate and the surface of the imprint template, and to fast fill the imprinting material into the relief pattern. It is better if the viscosity is sufficiently low so that minimal pressure, for example, and without limitation, a pressure of about 2-4 psi, and no additional heating are necessary to move the imprinting material into the relief pattern on the imprint template; (b) low vapor pressure so that there is little evaporation (evaporation is a problem since the droplets of imprinting material may be on the order of 80 pico-liters, and this results in droplets having a large ratio between surface area and volume); and (c) cohesive strength of the cured imprinting material.

[0006] In light of the above, there is a need for imprinting materials for use in imprint lithography that satisfy one or more of the above-identified design criteria.

Summary of the Invention

[0007] The present invention is directed to a material for use in imprint lithography that features a composition having a viscosity associated therewith and including a surfactant, a polymerizable component, and an initiator responsive to a stimuli to vary the viscosity in response thereto, with the composition, in a liquid state, having the viscosity being lower than about 100 centipoises, a vapor pressure of less than about 20 Torr, and in a solid cured state a tensile modulus of greater than about 100 MPa, a break stress of greater than about 3 MPa and an elongation at break of greater than about 2%.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0008] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a lithographic system useful in carrying out one or more embodiments of the present invention;

[0009] FIG. 2 is a simplified elevation view of a lithographic system shown in FIG. 1;

[0010] FIG. 3 is a simplified representation of the material from which an imprinting layer, shown in FIG. 2, is comprised before being polymerized and cross-linked;

[0011] FIG. 4 is a simplified representation of cross-linked polymer material into which the material shown in FIG. 3 is transformed after being subjected to radiation;

[0012] FIG. 5 is a simplified elevation view of a mold spaced-apart from the imprinting layer, shown in FIG. 1, after patterning and solidification/polymerization of the imprinting layer; and

[0013] FIG. 6 is a simplified elevation view of the imprint material disposed on a substrate in accordance with the present invention.

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0014] FIG. 1 shows the lithographic system 10 that may be used to carry out imprint lithography in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention and that may utilize imprinting materials fabricated in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, system 10 includes a pair of spaced-apart bridge supports 12 having bridge 14 and stage support 16 extending therebetween. As further shown in FIG. 1, bridge 14 and stage support 16 are spaced-apart. Imprint head 18 is coupled to bridge 14, and extends from bridge 14 toward stage support 16. Motion stage 20 is disposed upon stage support 16 to face imprint head 18, and motion stage 20 is configured to move with respect to stage support 16 along X- and Y-axes. Radiation source 22 is coupled to system 10 to impinge actinic radiation upon motion stage 20. As further shown in FIG. 1, radiation source 22 is coupled to bridge 14, and includes power generator 23 connected to radiation source 22. An exemplary system is available under the trade name IMPRIO 100™ from Molecular Imprints, Inc. having a place of business at 1807-C Braker Lane, Suite 100, Austin, Tex. 78758. The system description for the IMPRIO 100™ is available at www.molecularimprints.com and is incorporated herein by reference.

[0015] Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, connected to imprint head 18 is imprint template 26 having mold 28 thereon. Mold 28 includes a plurality of features defined by a plurality of spaced-apart recessions 28a and protrusions 28b. The plurality of features defines an original pattern that is to be transferred into substrate 31 positioned on motion stage 20. Substrate 31 may comprise a bare wafer or a wafer with one or more layers disposed thereon. To that end, imprint head 18 is adapted to move along the Z-axis and vary a distance “d” between mold 28 and substrate 31. In this manner, features on mold 28 may be imprinted into a conformable region of substrate 31, discussed more fully below. Radiation source 22 is located so that mold 28 is positioned between radiation source 22 and substrate 31. As a result, mold 28 is fabricated from material that allows it to be substantially transparent to the radiation produced by radiation source 22.

[0016] Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3, a conformable region, such as imprinting layer 34, is disposed on a portion of surface 32 that presents a substantially planar profile. It should be understood that the conformable region may be formed using any known technique to produce conformable material on surface 32. In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the conformable region consists of imprinting layer 34 being deposited as a plurality of spaced-apart discrete droplets 36 of material 36a on substrate 31, discussed more fully below. Imprinting layer 34 is formed from a low molecular weight material 36a that is concurrently polymerized and cross-linked to record the original pattern therein, defining a recorded pattern. Material 36a is shown in FIG. 4 as being polymerized and cross-linked, forming cross-linked polymer material 36c. Cross-linking is shown at points 36b.

[0017] Referring to FIGS. 2, 3 and 5, the pattern recorded in imprinting layer 34 is produced, in part, by mechanical contact with mold 28. To that end, imprint head 18 reduces the distance “d” to allow imprinting layer 34 to come into mechanical contact with mold 28, spreading droplets 36 so as to form imprinting layer 34 with a contiguous formation of material 36a over surface 32. In one embodiment, distance “d” is reduced to allow sub-portions 34a of imprinting layer 34 to ingress into and to fill recessions 28a.

[0018] To facilitate filling of recessions 28a, material 36a is provided with the requisite properties to completely fill recessions 28a while covering surface 32 with a contiguous formation of material 36a. In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, sub-portions 34b of imprinting layer 34 in superimposition with protrusions 28b remain after the desired, usually minimum distance “d,” has been reached, leaving sub-portions 34a with a thickness t₁and sub-portions 34b with a thickness, t₂. Thicknesses “t₁” and “t₂” may be any thickness desired, dependent upon the application.

[0019] Referring to FIGS. 2, 3 and 4, after a desired distance “d” has been reached, radiation source 22 produces actinic radiation that polymerizes and cross-links material 36a, forming polymer material 36c in which a substantial portion thereof is cross-linked. As a result, material 36a transforms to material 36c, which is a solid, forming imprinting layer 134, shown in FIG. 5. Specifically, material 36c is solidified to provide side 34c of imprinting layer 134 with a shape conforming to a shape of a surface 28c of mold 28, with imprinting layer 134 having recesses 30 (the bottom of the recesses may be referred to as a residual layer). After imprinting layer 134 is transformed to consist of material 36c, shown in FIG. 4, imprint head 18, shown in FIG. 2, is moved to increase distance “d” so that mold 28 and imprinting layer 134 are spaced-apart.

[0020] Referring to FIG. 5, additional processing may be employed to complete the patterning of substrate 31. For example, substrate 31 and imprinting layer 134 may be etched to transfer the pattern of imprinting layer 134 into substrate 31, providing a patterned surface (not shown). To facilitate etching, the material from which imprinting layer 134 is formed may be varied to define a relative etch rate with respect to substrate 31, as desired.

[0021] To that end, etching may be performed in a two-step process. S. C. Johnson, T. C. Bailey, M. D. Dickey, B. J. Smith, E. K. Kim, A. T. Jamieson, N. A. Stacey, J. G. Ekerdt, and C. G. Willson describe suitable etch processes in an article entitled “Advances in Step and Flash Imprint Lithography,” SPIE Microlithography Conference, February 2003, which is available on the Internet at www.molecularimprints.com, and is incorporated by reference herein. As set forth in the article, the first etch step, referred to as a “break-through etch,” anisotropically removes residual cross-linked material 134 to break through to an underlying transfer layer (in this respect, better etch selectivity is enabled by keeping the residual layer small). The second etch step, referred to as a “transfer etch,” uses the remaining pattern in cross-linked material 134 as an etch mask to transfer the pattern into the underlying transfer layer. In one embodiment, silicon in cross-link material 134, and the lack of silicon in the transfer layer, provides etch selectivity therebetween. In such an embodiment, the etching may be done in a LAM Research 9400SE obtained from Lam Research, Inc. of Fremont, Calif. For example, and without limitation, a halogen “breakthrough etch” may be utilized which comprises an anisotropic halogen reactive ion etch (“RIE”) rich in fluorine, i.e., wherein at least one of the precursors was a fluorine-containing material (for example, and without limitation, a combination of CHF₃and O₂, where the organosilicon nature of cross-linked material 134 may call for the use of a halogen gas). Other suitable halogen compounds include, for example, and without limitation, CF₄. This etch is similar to a standard SiO₂etch performed in modern integrated circuit processing. Next, an anisotropic oxygen reactive ion etch may be used to transfer the features to underlying substrate 31 wherein the remaining silicon containing features serve as an etch mask to transfer the pattern to underlying substrate 31. The “transfer etch” may be achieved, for example, and without limitation, with a standard, anisotropic, oxygen RIE processing tool. However, in general, any suitable etch process may be employed, dependent upon the etch rate desired and the underlying constituents that form substrate 31 and imprinting layer 134. Exemplary etch processes may include plasma etching, reactive ion etching, chemical wet etching and the like.

[0022] Referring to both FIGS. 1 and 2, exemplary radiation source 22 may produce ultraviolet radiation; however, any known radiation source may be employed. The selection of radiation employed to initiate the polymerization of the material in imprinting layer 34 is known to one skilled in the art and typically depends on the specific application which is desired. Furthermore, the plurality of features on mold 28 are shown as recessions 28a extending along a direction parallel to protrusions 28b that provide a cross-section of mold 28 with a shape of a battlement. However, recessions 28a and protrusions 28b may correspond to virtually any feature required to create an integrated circuit and may be as small as a few tenths of nanometers.

[0023] Referring to FIGS. 1, 2 and 5, the pattern produced by the present patterning technique may be transferred into substrate 31 to provide features having aspect ratios as great as 30:1. To that end, one embodiment of mold 28 has recessions 28a defining an aspect ratio in a range of 1:1 to 10:1. Specifically, protrusions 28b have a width W₁in a range of about 10 nm to about 5000 μm, and recessions 28a have a width W₂in a range of 10 nm to about 5000 μm. As a result, mold 28 and/or template 26, may be formed from various conventional materials, such as, but not limited to, fused-silica, quartz, silicon, organic polymers, siloxane polymers, borosilicate glass, fluorocarbon polymers, metal, hardened sapphire and the like.

[0024] Referring to FIGS. 1, 2 and 3, the characteristics of material 36a are important to efficiently pattern substrate 31 in light of the deposition process employed. As mentioned above, material 36a is deposited on substrate 31 as a plurality of discrete and spaced-apart droplets 36. The combined volume of droplets 36 is such that material 36a is distributed appropriately over an area of surface 32 where imprinting layer 34 is to be formed. As a result, imprinting layer 34 is spread and patterned concurrently, with the pattern being subsequently set into imprinting layer 34 by exposure to radiation, such as ultraviolet radiation. As a result of the deposition process, it is desired that material 36a have certain characteristics to facilitate rapid and even spreading of material 36a in droplets 36 over surface 32 so that all thicknesses t_iare substantially uniform and all thicknesses t₂are substantially uniform. The desirable characteristics include having a low viscosity, for example, and without limitation, in a range of about 0.5 to about 5 centipoise (cps), as well as the ability to wet surface of substrate 31 and mold 28 and to avoid subsequent pit or hole formation after polymerization. With these characteristics satisfied, imprinting layer 34 may be made sufficiently thin while avoiding formation of pits or holes in the thinner regions, such as sub-portions 34b, shown in FIG. 5. However, the characteristics of material 36a are process dependent and may vary as desired. For example, the viscosity may be 100 cps or greater.

[0025] The constituent components that form material 36a to provide the aforementioned characteristics may differ. This results from substrate 31 being formed from a number of different materials. As a result, the chemical composition of surface 32 varies dependent upon the material from which substrate 31 is formed. For example, substrate 31 may be formed from, silica, indium phosphide, lithium niobate, lithium tantalate, silicon, plastics, gallium arsenide, mercury telluride, and the like. Additionally, substrate 31 may include one or more layers in sub-portion 34b, for example, dielectric layer, metal layer, semiconductor layer, planarization layer and the like.

[0026] Referring to FIGS. 2, 3 and 4, it is desired, however, that material 36a include components to satisfy desired release characteristics when mold 28 interfaces with both material 36a and material 36c. Specifically, to ensure efficient filling of features of mold 28, it is desired that the interface of mold 28 and material 36a be established so that wetting of mold 28 by imprinting material 36a is facilitated. However, once material 36a is solidified into material 36c, material 36a should preferentially adhere to surface 32 of substrate 31 and easily release from mold 28. In this fashion, distortions in the pattern recorded in solidified material 36c are minimized. The preferential adhesion of material 36c to substrate 31 is referred to as release characteristics. The release characteristics of imprinting material 36c are measured employing an adhesion test described by Taniguchi et al. in Measurement of Adhesive Force Between Mold and Photocurable Resin in Imprint Technology, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, part 1, vol. 40, beginning at page 4194 (2002). It has been discovered that desirable values for these release characteristics are: (a) an adhesion force to mold 28, for example, and without limitation, of about 0.15 kg or less; and (b) an adhesion force to substrate 31, for example, and without limitation, of about 1.14 kg or more. It is desired that the ratio of adhesion forces, i.e., the adhesion force of substrate 31/the adhesion force of mold 28 [hereinafter referred to as the adhesion ratio] be 5 or greater.

[0027] In addition to the above-described release characteristics, when designing an imprinting material for use in imprint lithography, further considerations include: (a) low viscosity, for example, and without limitation, a viscosity of 5 centipoise or less, to enable desirable wetting and spreading on the substrate and rapid fill of the features on the imprint template (it is better if the viscosity is sufficiently low so that minimal pressure (for example, and without limitation, a pressure of about 2-4 psi) with minimal or no additional heating to move the imprinting material into features of an imprint template); (b) low vapor pressure so that there is little evaporation (evaporation is a problem since the droplets of imprinting material may be on the order of 80 pico-liters, and this results in droplets having a large ratio between surface area and volume); (c) the use of a suitable initiator to initiate polymerization upon exposure to actinic radiation, e.g., UV radiation, thermal radiation and the like; (d) a monomer component that satisfies the low viscosity characteristics in a liquid state of the composition and provide suitable mechanical strength in a solid cured state of the composition; and (e) silylated monomers to provide the silicon desired to provide etch selectivity.

[0028] In addition to the above, we have discovered macroscopic mechanical properties of a polymerized imprinting material that is desired to be taken into consideration when designing an appropriate imprinting material. These include: (a) tensile modulus, for example, and without limitation, of about 100-400 MPa or greater—typically, the higher the better; (b) break stress, for example, and without limitation, of about 3-12 MPa or greater—typically, the higher the better; and (c) elongation at break, for example, and without limitation, of 2% or more.

[0029] The design of a suitable imprinting material is an iterative procedure that focuses on materials in the following order: (a) formulation volatility (i.e., use of low vapor pressure components); (b) viscosity control (i.e., use of low viscosity components); (c) rapid polymerization kinetics, e.g., less than a minute and more suitable less than two seconds; (d) component miscibility; (e) mechanical properties (tensile modulus, break stress, elongation at break, and T_g); (f) wetting and spreading (fluid flow behavior); and (g) adhesions (low to the imprint template and high to the substrate).

[0030] The requirement of low viscosity may restrict the choice of components used to fabricate the imprinting material. To build up the strength of the polymerized material based on non-polar monomers, one may compromise and add higher viscosity components. For example, identified is isobornyl acrylate as the building block with silicon containing acrylate monomer components being added to provide silicon for etch selectivity. Typically, the high viscosity components are added judiciously to maintain an overall viscosity of imprinting material 36a to be less than 5 cps.

[0031] We have designed an imprinting material by taking into account the design considerations set forth above, and adding the use of a fluorinated surfactant to satisfy desired release characteristics. An exemplary composition for material 36a that utilizes a fluorinated surfactant is produced by mixing (with exemplary proportions being given in weight): (i) acryloxymethylpentamethyldisiloxane (for example, and without limitation, about 37 gm) which is available under the designation XG-1064 from Gelest, Inc. of Morrisville, Pa., (ii) isobornyl acrylate (“IBOA”) (for example, and without limitation, about 42 gm) that is available from Aldrich Chemical Company of Milwaukee, Wis., (iii) ethylene glycol diacrylate (for example, and without limitation, about 18 gm) that is available from Aldrich Chemical Company of Milwaukee, Wis., (iv) a UV photoinitiator, for example, and without limitation, 2-hydrozy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-propan-1-one (for example, and without limitation, about 3 gm) that is available under the designation Darocur 1173 from CIBA® of Tarrytown, N.Y.), and (v) FSO-100 (for example, and without limitation, about 0.5 gm) where FSO-100 is a surfactant that is available under the designation ZONYL® FSO-100 from DUPONT™ (FSO-100 has a general structure of R₁R₂where R₁═F(CF₂CF₂)_y, with Y being in a range of 1 to 7, inclusive and R₂═CH₂CH₂O(CH₂CH₂O)_xH, where X is in a range of 0 to 15, inclusive).

[0032] An alternative composition for material 36a is produced by mixing (with exemplary proportions being given in weight): (i) acryloxymethylpentamethyldisiloxane (for example, and without limitation, about 37 gm) which is available under the designation XG-1064 from Gelest, Inc. of Morrisville, Pa., (ii) isobornyl acrylate (“IBOA”) (for example, and without limitation, about 42 gm) that is available from Aldrich Chemical Company of Milwaukee, Wis., (iii) ethylene glycol diacrylate (for example, and without limitation, about 18 gm) that is available from Aldrich Chemical Company of Milwaukee, Wis., (iv) a UV photoinitiator, for example, and without limitation, 2-hydrozy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-propan-1-one (for example, and without limitation, about 3 gm) that is available under the designation Darocur 1173 from CIBA® of Tarrytown, N.Y.), and (v) FC4432 (for example, and without limitation, about 0.5 gm) where FC4432 is a polymeric surfactant that is available from 3M Company under the designation FLUORAD® FC4432.

[0033] Another alternative composition for material 36a is produced by mixing (with exemplary proportions being given in weight): (i) acryloxymethylpentamethyldisiloxane (for example, and without limitation, about 37 gm) which is available under the designation XG-1064 from Gelest, Inc. of Morrisville, Pa., (ii) isobornyl acrylate (“IBOA”) (for example, and without limitation, about 42 gm) that is available from Aldrich Chemical Company of Milwaukee, Wis., (iii) ethylene glycol diacrylate (for example, and without limitation, about 18 gm) that is available from Aldrich Chemical Company of Milwaukee, Wis., (iv) a UV photoinitiator, for example, and without limitation, 2-hydrozy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-propan-1-one (for example, and without limitation, about 3 gm) that is available under the designation Darocur 1173 from CIBA® of Tarrytown, N.Y.), and (v) FC4430 (for example, and without limitation, about 0.5 gm) where FC4430 is a polymeric surfactant that is available from 3M Company under the designation FLUORAD® FC4430.

[0034] In addition to the silicon containing composition for material 36a, a non-silicon-containing composition for material 36a may be employed. An exemplary non-silicon-containing composition includes i) approximately 55 gm isobornyl acrylate, ii) approximately 27 gm n-hexyl acrylate, iii) approximately 15 gm ethylene glycol diacrylate, iv) approximately 0.5 gm of the ZONYL® FSO-100 surfactant, and v) the DAROCUR® initiator that is approximately 3 gm of the composition.

[0035] An additional non-silicon-containing composition for material 36a, includes i) approximately 55 gm isobornyl acrylate, ii) approximately 27 gm n-hexyl acrylate, iii) approximately 15 gm ethylene glycol diacrylate, iv) approximately 0.5 gm of the FC4432 surfactant, and v) the DAROCUR initiator that is approximately 3 gm of the composition.

[0036] Another non-silicon-containing composition for material 36a includes i) approximately 55 gm isobornyl acrylate, ii) approximately 27 gm n-hexyl acrylate, iii) approximately 15 gm ethylene glycol diacrylate, iv) approximately 0.5 gm of the FC4430 surfactant, and v) the DAROCUR initiator that is approximately 3 gm of the composition. Each of the above-identified compositions also includes stabilizers that are well known in the chemical art to increase the operational life of the composition.

[0037] In yet another example of a non-silicon-containing composition included are i) approximately 47 gm of isobornyl acrylate, ii) approximately 25 gm of n-hexyl acrylate, iii) approximately 25 gm of ethylene glycol diacrylate, iv) approximately 0.5 gm of the ZONYL® FSO-100 surfactant, and v) the DAROCUR® initiator that is approximately 3 gm of the composition.

[0038] In yet another non-silicon-containing composition for material 36a a surfactant mixture is included that comprises of a non-fluorinated surfactant and a fluorinated surfactant. An exemplary composition includes i) approximately 55 gm isobornyl acrylate, ii) approximately 27 gm n-hexyl acrylate, iii) approximately 15 gm ethylene glycol diacrylate, and iv) the DAROCUR® initiator that is approximately 3 gm of the composition and 0.5 gm of a surfactant mixture. An exemplary surfactant mixture consists of 0.25 gm of FC4432 and 0.25 gm of a tri-siloxane surfactant available under the designation Sylgard® 309 from Dow Corning Corporation of Auburn, Mich.

[0039] Similarly, the surfactant mixture may be used in conjunction with a silicon-containing composition described above. An exemplary composition includes (i) acryloxymethylpentamethyldisiloxane (for example, and without limitation, about 37 gm) (ii) isobornyl acrylate (“IBOA”) (for example, and without limitation, about 42 gm) (iii) ethylene glycol diacrylate (for example, and without limitation, about 18 gm), (iv) the Darocur 1173 initiator (for example and without limitation 3 gm) and (v) an exemplary surfactant mixture consisting of 0.25 gm of FC4432 and 0.25 gm of a tri-siloxane surfactant available under the designation Sylgard® 309 from Dow Corning Corporation of Auburn, Mich.

[0040] Each of the above-identified compositions may also include stabilizers that are well known in the chemical art to increase the operational life of the composition. The surfactant comprises less than 1% of the imprinting material. However, the percentage of the surfactant may be greater than 1%.

[0041] An advantage provided by the above-described imprinting material is that they abrogates the need for an a priori release layer, i.e., a separate hydrophobic and/or low surface energy release layer disposed on imprint template 28. Specifically, the inclusion of the surfactants in the compositions provide desirable release properties to mold 28 and imprinting layer 34 so as to reduce, if not avoid, degradation of, or distortions in, the pattern recorded in the imprinting layer 34.

[0042] Referring to FIG. 6, it is believed that surfactant molecules in droplets 36 of the imprinting material preferentially move toward the gas-liquid interface in less than about 1 second. As such, it is believed that droplets 36 have a higher concentration of the surfactant in region 136 as compared to region 137 in which the polymerizable components are concentrated. It is believed that this is the result of an energy minimization process wherein the surfactant tends to move to the gas-liquid interface and its hydrophobic end aligns towards the gas. For example, it is believed that the hydrophobic end of the surfactant is aligned to project out of the liquid and into the gas, and the hydrophilic end is aligned to project into the liquid. However, when the imprinting material contacts the surface of the imprint template, it is believed that exposed silanol bonds on the surface of the imprint template cause the hydrophilic end of the surfactant molecule to flip and to contact the exposed silanol bonds so that the hydrophobic end faces downwardly e.g., outwardly from the surface of the imprint template to enable adhesion reduction. It is further believed that weakly bound surfactant lamella may also be formed at the surface of the imprint template, which lamella may comprise, for example, two (2) layers of surfactant molecules.

[0043] Referring to FIG. 2, an additional advantage provided by the above-described imprinting material is that template cleaning and preparation time is shortened; therefore, the overall process is simplified. Of course, the above-described imprinting material may be employed with an a priori release layer, such as those known in the prior art.

[0044] Another manner by which to improve the release properties of mold 28 includes pre-conditioning the pattern of mold 28 by exposing the same to a conditioning mixture including an additive that will remain on mold 28 to reduce the surface energy of the mold surface. An exemplary additive is a surfactant.

[0045] The above-described imprinting materials are useful in providing substantially high feature fidelity imprint lithography, while providing suitable operational life to an imprint template. For example, an imprint template having a patterning area, i.e., mold, of 25×25 mm having 40 to 50 nm features was employed to generate five hundred (500) imprints with minimal pattern feature degradation and distortion.

[0046] An exemplary imprinting method using the imprinting material described above includes as a first step, pretreating the surface of a quartz imprint template to create hydrophilic bonds at the surface, for example, and without limitation, silanol (Si—OH) bonds. In accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention, the surface of the imprint template is dipped in a 2.5:1 solution of H₂SO₄and H₂O₂to hydrolyze the surface, i.e., to create silanol bonds at the surface. This is referred to as piranha cleaning.

[0047] As a next step, the surface is further pre-treated by spraying the surface of the imprint template with a diluted surfactant solution (for example, and without limitation, 0.1% in isopropyl alcohol (IPA). The surfactant efficiently at the surface of the imprint template with hydrophobic ends projecting outwardly from the surface. Such alignment is promoted by piranha cleaning the surface to create silanol bonds on the surface. Exposure of the surface of the imprint template may be achieved by virtually any method known in the art, including dipping the surface into a volume of pre-treatment solution, wiping the surface with a cloth saturated with pre-treatment solution, and spraying a stream of pre-treatment solution onto the surface. The IPA in the pre-treatment solution may be allowed to evaporate before using the mold 28. In this manner, the IPA facilitates removing undesired contaminants from the surface while leaving the surfactant adsorbed thereto. Because the surfactant includes a hydrophobic end and a hydrophilic end, the silanol bonds promote alignment of the surfactant so that the hydrophilic end “attaches” to the —OH end of the silanol bonds, and the hydrophobic end points away from the surface. In a next step, a gap between the imprint template and the substrate is purged of air using, for example, and without limitation, a ˜5 psi helium purge.

[0048] In a next step, the imprinting material containing the surfactant is applied to the substrate, for example, and without limitation, by placing a pattern of substantially equidistant droplets of the following imprinting material on the substrate, or by spin-coating, or by any other method known to those of ordinary skill in the art. In this example, the substrate was covered with a transfer layer whose top layer was a cross-linked BARC material (BARC or “bottom antireflective coating” is an organic antireflective coating that is typically produced by a spin-on process). The BARC layer was used to prevent intermixing between an imprinting material and a transfer layer, which intermixing may be particularly problematic when using an imprinting material comprised of low viscosity components used herein, because such components have solvency toward many polymers. Substantial intermixing may cause problems, such as, for example, and without limitation, distortion of features during subsequent etching processes. This can be particularly problematic when feature thicknesses are as small as 50 to 100 nm. Next, the familiar steps of imprint lithography are carried out, i.e., exposure to actinic radiation to polymerize the imprinting material; separation of the imprint template and the substrate; and selective etching to transfer the feature pattern to the substrate.

[0049] It is believed that even when pre-treating the surface of the imprint template as described above utilizing one or more surfactants, the one or more surfactants are adsorbed to the silanol surface of the imprint template ultimately become abraded away. However, as was described above, the surfactant contained in the imprinting material rapidly comes to the gas-liquid surface of the droplets, and the surface of the imprint template is re-coated as a normal consequence of imprinting. As such, in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention, the pre-treatment step of applying the surfactant solution to the surface of the imprint template may be eliminated. In fact, in accordance with one or more further embodiments of the present invention, the imprint template may be contacted a few times with the imprinting material as a replacement for the pre-treatment step of applying the surfactant solution to the surface.

[0050] The embodiments of the present invention described above are exemplary. Many changes and modifications may be made to the disclosure recited above, while remaining within the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined not with reference to the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. An imprinting material for use in imprint lithography comprising:

a composition having a viscosity associated therewith and including a surfactant, a polymerizable component, and an initiator responsive to a stimuli to vary said viscosity in response thereto, with said composition, in a liquid state, having said viscosity being lower than about 100 centipoises, a vapor pressure of less than about 20 Torr, and in a solid cured state a tensile modulus of greater than about 100 MPa, a break stress of greater than about 3 MPa and an elongation at break of greater than about 2%.

2. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said surfactant comprises a non-ionic surfactant.

3. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said surfactant comprises a fluorinated surfactant.

4. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said surfactant comprises a fluorinated non-ionic surfactant.

5. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said monomer is selected from the group consisting of epoxies, acrylates, methacrylates and vinyl ethers.

6. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said monomer is selected from a set of polymerizable component containing silicon therein.

7. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said monomer is a substituted acrylate.

8. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said monomer is a silicon-containing acrylate.

9. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said monomer is selected from the group of substituted acrylates consisting of mono-substituted acrylates and multifunctional-substituted acrylates.

10. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said initiator is selected from the group consisting of photo initiators and thermal initiators.

11. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said initiator is a radical photoinitiator.

12. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said viscosity in said liquid state is less than about 25 centipoises.

13. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said viscosity in said liquid state is less than about 10 centipoises.

14. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said viscosity in said liquid state is less than about 5 centipoises.

15. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said vapor pressure is lower than about 5 Torr.

16. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said vapor pressure is lower than about 2 Torr.

17. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said tensile modulus is 100 MPa or greater.

18. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said break stress of about 3 MPa or greater.

19. The imprinting material as recited in claim 1 wherein said elongation at break is 8% or more.

Patent Citations (401)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US3527062(A)	1970-09-01	Bilinski et al.	Applicant
US3783520(A)	1974-01-01	King	Applicant
US3807027(A)	1974-04-01	Heisler	Applicant
US3807029(A)	1974-04-01	Troeger	Applicant
US3810874(A)	1974-05-01	Mitsch et al.	Applicant
US3811665(A)	1974-05-01	Seelig	Applicant
US3919351(A)	1975-11-01	Chang et al.	Applicant
US4062600(A)	1977-12-01	Wyse	Applicant
US4070116(A)	1978-01-01	Frosch et al.	Applicant
US4098001(A)	1978-07-01	Watson	Applicant
US4119688(A)	1978-10-01	Hiraoka	Applicant
US4155169(A)	1979-05-01	Drake et al.	Applicant
US4201800(A)	1980-05-01	Alcorn et al.	Applicant
US4202107(A)	1980-05-01	Watson	Applicant
US4251277(A)	1981-02-01	Martin	Applicant
US4267212(A)	1981-05-01	Sakawaki	Applicant
US4271258(A)	1981-06-01	Watariguchi	Applicant
US4326805(A)	1982-04-01	Feldman et al.	Applicant
US4337579(A)	1982-07-01	De Fazio	Applicant
US4355469(A)	1982-10-01	Nevins et al.	Applicant
US4414750(A)	1983-11-01	De Fazio	Applicant
US4426247(A)	1984-01-01	Tamamura et al.	Applicant
US4440804(A)	1984-04-01	Milgram	Applicant
US4451507(A)	1984-05-01	Beltz et al.	Applicant
US4507331(A)	1985-03-01	Hiraoka	Applicant
US4512848(A)	1985-04-01	Deckman et al.	Applicant
US4514439(A)	1985-04-01	Rounds	Applicant
US4517337(A)	1985-05-01	Lockhart et al.	Applicant
US4544572(A)	1985-10-01	Sandvig et al.	Applicant
US4552832(A)	1985-11-01	Blume et al.	Applicant
US4552833(A)	1985-11-01	Ito et al.	Applicant
US4600309(A)	1986-07-01	Fay	Applicant
US4610442(A)	1986-09-01	Oku et al.	Applicant
US4614667(A)	1986-09-01	Larson et al.	Applicant
US4617238(A)	1986-10-01	Crivello et al.	Applicant
US4657845(A)	1987-04-01	Frechet et al.	Applicant
US4687707(A)	1987-08-01	Matsuo et al.	Applicant
US4692205(A)	1987-09-01	Sachdev et al.	Applicant
US4694703(A)	1987-09-01	Routson	Applicant
US4707218(A)	1987-11-01	Giammarco et al.	Applicant
US4722878(A)	1988-02-01	Watakabe et al.	Applicant
US4724222(A)	1988-02-01	Feldman	Applicant
US4731155(A)	1988-03-01	Napoli et al.	Applicant
US4737425(A)	1988-04-01	Lin et al.	Applicant
US4763886(A)	1988-08-01	Takei	Applicant
US4808511(A)	1989-02-01	Holmes	Applicant
US4826943(A)	1989-05-01	Ito et al.	Applicant
US4846931(A)	1989-07-01	Gmitter et al.	Applicant
US4848911(A)	1989-07-01	Uchida et al.	Applicant
US4857477(A)	1989-08-01	Kanamori	Applicant
US4883561(A)	1989-11-01	Gmitter et al.	Applicant
US4891303(A)	1990-01-01	Garza et al.	Applicant
US4908298(A)	1990-03-01	Hefferon et al.	Applicant
US4919748(A)	1990-04-01	Bredbenner et al.	Applicant
US4921778(A)	1990-05-01	Thackeray et al.	Applicant
US4929083(A)	1990-05-01	Brunner	Applicant
US4931351(A)	1990-06-01	McColgin et al.	Applicant
US4959252(A)	1990-09-01	Bonnebat et al.	Applicant
US4964945(A)	1990-10-01	Calhoun	Applicant
US4976818(A)	1990-12-01	Hashimoto et al.	Applicant
US4980316(A)	1990-12-01	Huebner	Applicant
US4988274(A)	1991-01-01	Kenmochi	Applicant
US4999280(A)	1991-03-01	Hiraoka	Applicant
US5028366(A)	1991-07-01	Harakal et al.	Applicant
US5053318(A)	1991-10-01	Gulla et al.	Applicant
US5063321(A)	1991-11-01	Carter	Applicant
US5071694(A)	1991-12-01	Uekita et al.	Applicant
US5072126(A)	1991-12-01	Progler	Applicant
US5073230(A)	1991-12-01	Maracas et al.	Applicant
US5074667(A)	1991-12-01	Miyatake	Applicant
US5108875(A)	1992-04-01	Thackeray et al.	Applicant
US5110514(A)	1992-05-01	Soane	Applicant
US5126006(A)	1992-06-01	Cronin et al.	Applicant
US5148036(A)	1992-09-01	Matsugu et al.	Applicant
US5148037(A)	1992-09-01	Suda et al.	Applicant
US5149592(A)	1992-09-01	Wojnarowicz	Examiner
US5151754(A)	1992-09-01	Ishibashi et al.	Applicant
US5169494(A)	1992-12-01	Hashimoto et al.	Applicant
US5173393(A)	1992-12-01	Sezi et al.	Applicant
US5179863(A)	1993-01-01	Uchida et al.	Applicant
US5198326(A)	1993-03-01	Hashimoto et al.	Applicant
US5204381(A)	1993-04-01	Zeigler	Applicant
US5204739(A)	1993-04-01	Domenicali	Applicant
US5206983(A)	1993-05-01	Guckel et al.	Applicant
US5212147(A)	1993-05-01	Sheats	Applicant
US5234793(A)	1993-08-01	Sebald et al.	Applicant
US5240550(A)	1993-08-01	Boehnke et al.	Applicant
US5240878(A)	1993-08-01	Fitzsimmons et al.	Applicant
US5242711(A)	1993-09-01	DeNatale et al.	Applicant
US5244818(A)	1993-09-01	Jokerst et al.	Applicant
US5259926(A)	1993-11-01	Kuwabara et al.	Applicant
US5270984(A)	1993-12-01	Mine	Applicant
US5277749(A)	1994-01-01	Griffith et al.	Applicant
US5298556(A)	1994-03-01	Stephens	Applicant
US5314731(A)	1994-05-01	Yoneda et al.	Applicant
US5314772(A)	1994-05-01	Kozicki et al.	Applicant
US5318870(A)	1994-06-01	Hartney	Applicant
US5324683(A)	1994-06-01	Fitch et al.	Applicant
US5328810(A)	1994-07-01	Lowrey et al.	Applicant
US5330881(A)	1994-07-01	Sidman et al.	Applicant
US5331020(A)	1994-07-01	Brown et al.	Applicant
US5348616(A)	1994-09-01	Hartman et al.	Applicant
US5362606(A)	1994-11-01	Hartney et al.	Applicant
US5366851(A)	1994-11-01	Novembre	Applicant
US5369722(A)	1994-11-01	Heming et al.	Applicant
US5374454(A)	1994-12-01	Bickford et al.	Applicant
US5376810(A)	1994-12-01	Hoenk et al.	Applicant
US5380474(A)	1995-01-01	Rye et al.	Applicant
US5389696(A)	1995-02-01	Dempsey et al.	Applicant
US5392123(A)	1995-02-01	Marcus et al.	Applicant
US5417802(A)	1995-05-01	Obeng	Applicant
US5421981(A)	1995-06-01	Leader et al.	Applicant
US5422295(A)	1995-06-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US5424549(A)	1995-06-01	Feldman	Applicant
US5425848(A)	1995-06-01	Haisma et al.	Applicant
US5425964(A)	1995-06-01	Southwell et al.	Applicant
US5431777(A)	1995-07-01	Austin et al.	Applicant
US5439766(A)	1995-08-01	Day et al.	Applicant
US5452090(A)	1995-09-01	Progler et al.	Applicant
US5453157(A)	1995-09-01	Jeng	Applicant
US5458520(A)	1995-10-01	DeMercurio et al.	Applicant
US5468542(A)	1995-11-01	Crouch	Applicant
US5480047(A)	1996-01-01	Tanigawa et al.	Applicant
US5482768(A)	1996-01-01	Kawasato et al.	Applicant
US5512131(A)	1996-04-01	Kumar et al.	Applicant
US5515167(A)	1996-05-01	Ledger et al.	Applicant
US5523878(A)	1996-06-01	Wallace et al.	Applicant
US5527662(A)	1996-06-01	Hashimoto et al.	Applicant
US5542978(A)	1996-08-01	Kindt-Larsen et al.	Applicant
US5545367(A)	1996-08-01	Bae et al.	Applicant
US5566584(A)	1996-10-01	Briganti	Applicant
US5594042(A)	1997-01-01	Glover et al.	Applicant
US5601641(A)	1997-02-01	Stephens	Applicant
US5629095(A)	1997-05-01	Bujanowski et al.	Applicant
US5633505(A)	1997-05-01	Chung et al.	Applicant
US5654238(A)	1997-08-01	Cronin et al.	Applicant
US5669303(A)	1997-09-01	Maracas et al.	Applicant
US5670415(A)	1997-09-01	Rust	Applicant
US5700626(A)	1997-12-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US5723176(A)	1998-03-01	Keyworth et al.	Applicant
US5724145(A)	1998-03-01	Kondo et al.	Applicant
US5725788(A)	1998-03-01	Maracas et al.	Applicant
US5736424(A)	1998-04-01	Prybyla et al.	Applicant
US5743998(A)	1998-04-01	Park	Applicant
US5747102(A)	1998-05-01	Smith et al.	Applicant
US5753014(A)	1998-05-01	Van Rijn	Applicant
US5760500(A)	1998-06-01	Kondo et al.	Applicant
US5772905(A)	1998-06-01	Chou	Applicant
US5776748(A)	1998-07-01	Singhvi et al.	Applicant
US5779799(A)	1998-07-01	Davis	Applicant
US5802914(A)	1998-09-01	Fassler et al.	Applicant
US5820769(A)	1998-10-01	Chou	Applicant
US5837314(A)	1998-11-01	Beaton et al.	Applicant
US5849209(A)	1998-12-01	Kindt-Larsen et al.	Applicant
US5849222(A)	1998-12-01	Jen et al.	Applicant
US5855686(A)	1999-01-01	Rust	Applicant
US5861467(A)	1999-01-01	Bujanowski et al.	Applicant
US5877036(A)	1999-03-01	Kawai	Applicant
US5877861(A)	1999-03-01	Ausschnitt et al.	Applicant
US5888650(A)	1999-03-01	Calhoun et al.	Applicant
US5895263(A)	1999-04-01	Carter et al.	Applicant
US5900160(A)	1999-05-01	Whitesides et al.	Applicant
US5905104(A)	1999-05-01	Eklund et al.	Applicant
US5907782(A)	1999-05-01	Wu	Applicant
US5912049(A)	1999-06-01	Shirley	Applicant
US5926690(A)	1999-07-01	Toprac et al.	Applicant
US5937758(A)	1999-08-01	Maracas et al.	Applicant
US5942871(A)	1999-08-01	Lee	Applicant
US5948219(A)	1999-09-01	Rohner	Applicant
US5948470(A)	1999-09-01	Harrison et al.	Applicant
US5948570(A)	1999-09-01	Kornblit et al.	Applicant
US5952127(A)	1999-09-01	Yamanaka	Applicant
US5956216(A)	1999-09-01	Chou	Applicant
US6015609(A)	2000-01-01	Chaouk et al.	Examiner
US6033977(A)	2000-03-01	Gutsche et al.	Applicant
US6035805(A)	2000-03-01	Rust	Applicant
US6038280(A)	2000-03-01	Rossiger et al.	Applicant
US6039897(A)	2000-03-01	Lockhead et al.	Applicant
US6046056(A)	2000-04-01	Parce et al.	Applicant
US6051345(A)	2000-04-01	Huang	Applicant
US6060530(A)	2000-05-01	Chaouk et al.	Examiner
US6066269(A)	2000-05-01	Wei et al.	Applicant
US6074827(A)	2000-06-01	Nelson et al.	Applicant
US6091485(A)	2000-07-01	Li et al.	Applicant
US6096655(A)	2000-08-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US6114404(A)	2000-09-01	Deeken et al.	Applicant
US6117708(A)	2000-09-01	Wensel	Applicant
US6125183(A)	2000-09-01	Jiawook et al.	Applicant
US6128085(A)	2000-10-01	Buermann et al.	Applicant
US6132632(A)	2000-10-01	Haney et al.	Applicant
US6143412(A)	2000-11-01	Schueller et al.	Applicant
US6146811(A)	2000-11-01	Kim et al.	Applicant
US6150231(A)	2000-11-01	Muller et al.	Applicant
US6150680(A)	2000-11-01	Eastman et al.	Applicant
US6160030(A)	2000-12-01	Chaouk et al.	Examiner
US6168845(B1)	2001-01-01	Fontana, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US6174931(B1)	2001-01-01	Moon et al.	Applicant
US6174932(B1)	2001-01-01	Pachl et al.	Examiner
US6180239(B1)	2001-01-01	Whitesides et al.	Applicant
US6188150(B1)	2001-02-01	Spence	Applicant
US6190929(B1)	2001-02-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US6204343(B1)	2001-03-01	Barucha et al.	Applicant
US6204922(B1)	2001-03-01	Chalmers	Applicant
US6218316(B1)	2001-04-01	Marsh	Applicant
US6225367(B1)	2001-05-01	Chaouk et al.	Examiner
US6245581(B1)	2001-06-01	Bonser et al.	Applicant
US6274294(B1)	2001-08-01	Hines	Applicant
US6309580(B1)	2001-10-01	Chou	Applicant
US6316290(B1)	2001-11-01	Wensel	Applicant
US6326627(B1)	2001-12-01	Putvinski et al.	Applicant
US6329256(B1)	2001-12-01	Ibok	Applicant
US6334960(B1)	2002-01-01	Willson et al.	Applicant
US6335149(B1)	2002-01-01	Xu et al.	Applicant
US6342097(B1)	2002-01-01	Terry et al.	Applicant
US6344105(B1)	2002-02-01	Daugherty et al.	Applicant
US6355198(B1)	2002-03-01	Kim et al.	Applicant
US6383928(B1)	2002-05-01	Eissa	Applicant
US6387783(B1)	2002-05-01	Furukawa et al.	Applicant
US6388253(B1)	2002-05-01	Su	Applicant
US6391217(B2)	2002-05-01	Schaffer et al.	Applicant
US6391798(B1)	2002-05-01	DeFelice et al.	Applicant
US6411010(B1)	2002-06-01	Suzuki et al.	Applicant
US6447919(B1)	2002-09-01	Brown et al.	Applicant
US6455411(B1)	2002-09-01	Jiang et al.	Applicant
US6467761(B1)	2002-10-01	Amatucci et al.	Applicant
US6468642(B1)	2002-10-01	Bray et al.	Applicant
US6468896(B2)	2002-10-01	Rohr et al.	Applicant
US6475704(B1)	2002-11-01	Iwasaki et al.	Applicant
US6482742(B1)	2002-11-01	Chou	Applicant
US6489068(B1)	2002-12-01	Kye	Applicant
US6495624(B1)	2002-12-01	Brown	Applicant
US6503914(B1)	2003-01-01	Benish et al.	Applicant
US6514672(B2)	2003-02-01	Tsai et al.	Applicant
US6517995(B1)	2003-02-01	Jacobenson et al.	Applicant
US6518168(B1)	2003-02-01	Clem et al.	Applicant
US6518189(B1)	2003-02-01	Chou	Applicant
US6534418(B1)	2003-03-01	Plat et al.	Applicant
US6541356(B2)	2003-04-01	Fogel et al.	Applicant
US6541360(B1)	2003-04-01	Plat et al.	Applicant
US6544594(B2)	2003-04-01	Linford et al.	Applicant
US6561706(B2)	2003-05-01	Singh et al.	Applicant
US6565776(B1)	2003-05-01	Li et al.	Applicant
US6565928(B2)	2003-05-01	Sakamoto et al.	Applicant
US6580172(B2)	2003-06-01	Mancini et al.	Applicant
US6583248(B1)	2003-06-01	Bowen	Applicant
US6600207(B2)	2003-07-01	Huang et al.	Applicant
US6632742(B2)	2003-10-01	Yang et al.	Applicant
US6635581(B2)	2003-10-01	Wong	Applicant
US6646662(B1)	2003-11-01	Nebashi et al.	Applicant
US6649272(B2)	2003-11-01	Moore et al.	Applicant
US6664306(B2)	2003-12-01	Gaddam et al.	Applicant
US6677252(B2)	2004-01-01	Marsh	Applicant
US6696157(B1)	2004-02-01	David et al.	Applicant
US6696220(B2)	2004-02-01	Bailey et al.	Applicant
US6703190(B2)	2004-03-01	Elian	Applicant
US6713238(B1)	2004-03-01	Chou et al.	Applicant
US6716767(B2)	2004-04-01	Shih et al.	Applicant
US6719915(B2)	2004-04-01	Willson et al.	Applicant
US6721529(B2)	2004-04-01	Chen et al.	Applicant
US6730256(B1)	2004-05-01	Bloomstein et al.	Applicant
US6737202(B2)	2004-05-01	Gehoski et al.	Applicant
US6737489(B2)	2004-05-01	Linert et al.	Applicant
US6743713(B2)	2004-06-01	Mukherjee-Roy et al.	Applicant
US6767983(B1)	2004-07-01	Fujiyama et al.	Applicant
US6770852(B1)	2004-08-01	Steger	Applicant
US6774183(B1)	2004-08-01	Palumbo et al.	Applicant
US6776094(B1)	2004-08-01	Whitesides et al.	Applicant
US6777170(B1)	2004-08-01	Bloomstein et al.	Applicant
US6790905(B2)	2004-09-01	Fitzgerald et al.	Applicant
US6802870(B2)	2004-10-01	Chang et al.	Applicant
US6809356(B2)	2004-10-01	Chou	Applicant
US6828244(B2)	2004-12-01	Chou	Applicant
US6830819(B2)	2004-12-01	Kaplan et al.	Applicant
US6849558(B2)	2005-02-01	Schaper	Applicant
US6900881(B2)	2005-05-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US6908861(B2)	2005-06-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US6916584(B2)	2005-07-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US6932934(B2)	2005-08-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US6936194(B2)	2005-08-01	Watts	Applicant
US2001/0044075(A1)	2001-11-01	Nishimura et al.	Applicant
US2002/0042027(A1)	2002-04-01	Chou et al.	Applicant
US2002/0072009(A1)	2002-06-01	Kim et al.	Applicant
US2002/0093122(A1)	2002-07-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US2002/0094496(A1)	2002-07-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US2002/0098426(A1)	2002-07-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2002/0132482(A1)	2002-09-01	Chou	Applicant
US2002/0135099(A1)	2002-09-01	Robinson et al.	Applicant
US2002/0146642(A1)	2002-10-01	Kim et al.	Applicant
US2002/0150398(A1)	2002-10-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US2002/0167117(A1)	2002-11-01	Chou	Applicant
US2002/0177319(A1)	2002-11-01	Chou	Applicant
US2003/0034329(A1)	2003-02-01	Chou	Applicant
US2003/0062334(A1)	2003-04-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US2003/0080471(A1)	2003-05-01	Chou	Applicant
US2003/0080472(A1)	2003-05-01	Chou	Applicant
US2003/0081193(A1)	2003-05-01	White et al.	Applicant
US2003/0113638(A1)	2003-06-01	Mancini et al.	Applicant
US2003/0129542(A1)	2003-07-01	Shih et al.	Applicant
US2003/0166814(A1)	2003-09-01	Sparrowe et al.	Applicant
US2003/0205657(A1)	2003-11-01	Voisin	Applicant
US2003/0205658(A1)	2003-11-01	Voisin	Applicant
US2003/0215577(A1)	2003-11-01	Willson et al.	Applicant
US2003/0235787(A1)	2003-12-01	Watts et al.	Applicant
US2004/0007799(A1)	2004-01-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US2004/0008334(A1)	2004-01-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0009673(A1)	2004-01-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0010341(A1)	2004-01-01	Watts et al.	Applicant
US2004/0021254(A1)	2004-02-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0021866(A1)	2004-02-01	Watts et al.	Applicant
US2004/0022888(A1)	2004-02-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0029041(A1)	2004-02-01	Shih et al.	Applicant
US2004/0036201(A1)	2004-02-01	Chou et al.	Applicant
US2004/0046288(A1)	2004-03-01	Chou	Applicant
US2004/0053146(A1)	2004-03-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0065252(A1)	2004-04-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0086793(A1)	2004-05-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0089979(A1)	2004-05-01	Rubin	Applicant
US2004/0090611(A1)	2004-05-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US2004/0104641(A1)	2004-06-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US2004/0110856(A1)	2004-06-01	Young et al.	Applicant
US2004/0112861(A1)	2004-06-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US2004/0112862(A1)	2004-06-01	Willson et al.	Applicant
US2004/0116548(A1)	2004-06-01	Willson et al.	Applicant
US2004/0118809(A1)	2004-06-01	Chou et al.	Applicant
US2004/0124566(A1)	2004-07-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0131718(A1)	2004-07-01	Chou et al.	Applicant
US2004/0137734(A1)	2004-07-01	Chou et al.	Applicant
US2004/0141163(A1)	2004-07-01	Bailey et al.	Applicant
US2004/0141168(A1)	2004-07-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0149687(A1)	2004-08-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US2004/0156108(A1)	2004-08-01	Chou et al.	Applicant
US2004/0163563(A1)	2004-08-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0168586(A1)	2004-09-01	Bailey et al.	Applicant
US2004/0168588(A1)	2004-09-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US2004/0168613(A1)	2004-09-01	Nguyen	Applicant
US2004/0169441(A1)	2004-09-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US2004/0170770(A1)	2004-09-01	Nguyen	Applicant
US2004/0170771(A1)	2004-09-01	Bailey et al.	Applicant
US2004/0188381(A1)	2004-09-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0189994(A1)	2004-09-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0189996(A1)	2004-09-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0192041(A1)	2004-09-01	Jeong et al.	Applicant
US2004/0197843(A1)	2004-10-01	Chou et al.	Applicant
US2004/0200411(A1)	2004-10-01	Willson et al.	Applicant
US2004/0202865(A1)	2004-10-01	Homola et al.	Applicant
US2004/0202872(A1)	2004-10-01	Fang et al.	Applicant
US2004/0209177(A1)	2004-10-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0241338(A1)	2004-12-01	Foster et al.	Applicant
US2004/0250945(A1)	2004-12-01	Zheng et al.	Applicant
US2005/0037143(A1)	2005-02-01	Chou et al.	Applicant
US2005/0051698(A1)	2005-03-01	Sreenivasan et al.	Applicant
US2005/0084804(A1)	2005-04-01	Truskett et al.	Applicant
US2005/0100830(A1)	2005-05-01	Xu et al.	Applicant
US2005/0118749(A1)	2005-06-01	Sakamoto et al.	Applicant
US2005/0156357(A1)	2005-07-01	Willson et al.	Applicant
US2005/0160934(A1)	2005-07-01	Xu et al.	Applicant
US2006/0111454(A1)	2006-05-01	Xu et al.	Applicant
DE2800476	1978-07-01		Applicant
DE19648844	1997-09-01		Applicant
EP244884	1987-03-01		Applicant
EP733455	1996-09-01		Applicant
EP1342736(A2)	2003-10-01		Applicant
EP1491356(A2)	2004-12-01		Applicant
JP55-88332	1980-07-01		Applicant
JP57-7931	1982-01-01		Applicant
JP61-40845	1986-02-01		Applicant
JP63-138730	1988-06-01		Applicant
JP1-196749	1989-08-01		Applicant
JP2-24848	1990-01-01		Applicant
JP2-92603	1990-04-01		Applicant
JP2192045	1990-07-01		Applicant
JP2-248480	1990-10-01		Applicant
JP3-90345	1991-04-01		Applicant
JP9-278490	1997-10-01		Applicant
WO87/02935	1987-05-01		Applicant
WO92/17883	1992-10-01		Applicant
WO98/10121	1998-03-01		Applicant
WO99/05724	1999-02-01		Applicant
WO99/45753	1999-09-01		Applicant
WO99/63535	1999-12-01		Applicant
WO/21689	2000-04-01		Applicant
WO46035(A1)	2000-08-01		Applicant
WO54107(A1)	2000-09-01		Applicant
WO/54107	2000-09-01		Applicant
WO1/33232	2001-05-01		Applicant
WO1/33300	2001-05-01		Applicant
WO1/47003(A2)	2001-06-01		Applicant
WO1/53889	2001-07-01		Applicant
WO1/69317	2001-09-01		Applicant
WO1/79589	2001-10-01		Applicant
WO1/79592	2001-10-01		Applicant
WO1/90816	2001-11-01		Applicant
WO2/07199	2002-01-01		Applicant
WO2069040(A)	2002-09-01		Applicant
WO3/010289	2003-02-01		Applicant
WO3073164(A2)	2003-09-01		Applicant
WO3/079416	2003-09-01		Applicant
WO3/099536	2003-12-01		Applicant
WO2004/044651	2004-05-01		Applicant
WO2004061526(A)	2004-07-01		Applicant
WO2004/114016	2004-12-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (145)

Abstract of Japanese Patent 02-24848, Jan. 26, 1990.Applicant
Abstract of Japanese Patent 02-92603, Aug. 12, 2004.Applicant
Abstract of Japanese Patent 55-88332, Apr. 14, 2004.Applicant
Abstract of Japanese Patent 57-7931, Apr. 14, 2004.Applicant
Abstract of Japanese Patent 63-138730, Apr. 14, 2004.Applicant
Ananthasuresh et al., “Strategies for Systematic Synthesis of Compliant Mems.”, DSC-vol. 55-2, Dynamic Systems and Control: vol. 2, pp. 677-686, Nov. 1, 1994.Applicant
Arai et al., “Calibration and Basic Motion of Micro Hand Module.”, IEEE, Jan. 1. 1993, pp. 1660-1665.Applicant
Arai et al., “Development of a New Parallel Manipulator with Fixed Linear Actuator.”, In Proceedings of Japan/USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, Jan. 1, 1996, vol. 1, ASME, New York, pp. 145-149.Applicant
Bailey et al., “Imprint Lithography Templates having Alignment Marks,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/666,527, Filed with USPTO Sep. 18, 2003.Applicant
Bender et al., “Fabrication of Nanostructures using a UV-based Imprint Technique.”, Microelectronic Engineering 53, Jan. 1, 2000, pp. 233-236.Applicant
Cherala et al., “Applying Imprinting Material to Substrates Employing Electromagnetic Fields,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/687,562, Filed with USPTO Oct. 16, 2003.Applicant
Sreenivasan et al., “A Conforming Template for Patterning Liquids Disposed on Substrates.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/614,716, Filed with USPTO on Jul. 7, 2003.Applicant
Choi et al., “Design of Orientation Stages for Step and Flash Imprint Lithography.”, Precision Engineering, Jan. 1, 2001, pp. 192-199.Applicant
Chou et al., “Imprint Lithography with 25-Nanometer Resolution”, Science, Apr. 5, 1996, pp. 85-87, vol. 272.Applicant
Chou et al., “Imprint Lithography with Sub-10nm Feature Size and High Throughput”, Microelectronic Engineering, 1997, pp. 237-240, vol. 35.Applicant
Chou et al., “Imprint of Sub-25 nm Vias and Trenches in Polymers”, Applied Physics Letters, Nov. 20, 1995, pp. 3114-3116, vol. 67(21).Applicant
Chou et al., “Lithographically Induced Self-assembly of Periodic Polymer Micropillar Arrays.”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Nov. 1, 1999, B 17(6), pp. 3197-3202.Applicant
Chou et al., “Nanoimprint Lithography and Lithographically Induced Self-Assembly.”, MRS Bulletin, Jul. 1, 2001, pp. 512-517.Applicant
Cowie, “Polymers: Chemistry and Physics of Modem Materials.”, 2nd Ed., Jan. 1, 1991, pp. 408-409.Applicant
Feldman et al., “Wafer Chuck Magnification Correction in X-Ray Lithography.”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16(6), Nov. 1, 1998, pp. 3476-3479.Applicant
Gokan et al., “Dry Etch Resistance of Organic Materials.”, J. Electrochem. Soc.: Solid-State Science and Technology, Jan. 1, 1983, pp. 143-146.Applicant
Goldfarb et al., “Compliant Micromanipulator Design for Scaled Bilateral Telemanipulation of Small-Scale Environments.”, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition, Nov. 1, 1998, DSC-vol. 64, pp. 213-218.Applicant
Haisma et al., “Mold-assisted Nanolithography: A Process for Reliable Pattern Replication.”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Nov. 1, 1996, pp. 4124-4128.Applicant
Hashimoto et al., “Design and Characteristics of a Parallel Link Complaint Wrist.” IEEE, May 1, 1994, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kagoshiam University, pp. 2457-2462.Applicant
Heidari, “Nanoimprint Lithography at the 6 in. Wafer Scale.”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 18 (6), Nov. 1, 2000, pp. 3557-3560.Applicant
Hexel Coporation. “Tornado 2000 System Specifications.”, www.hexel.com, Nov. 12, 1999.Applicant
Hirai et al., “Mold Surface Treatment for Imprint Lithography.”, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, Aug. 1, 2001. vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 457-462.Applicant
Hogan et al., “Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part 1—Theory.”, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Mar. 1, 1985, vol. 107, pp. 1-7.Applicant
Hollis et al., “A Six-Degree-of-Freedom Magnetically Levitated Variable Compliance Fine-Motion Wrist: Design, Modeling, and Control.”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Jun. 1, 1991, vol. 7., No. 3, pp. 320-332.Applicant
Howell et al., “A Loop-Closure Theory for the Analysis and Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms.”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Mar. 1, 1996, vol. 188, pp. 121-125.Applicant
Hu et al., “Fluorescence Probe Techniques (FPT) for Measuring the Relative Efficiencies of Free Radical Photoinitiatiors.”, Macromolecules, May 29, 1998, 31, pp. 4107-4113.Applicant
Johnson et al., “Advances in Step and Flash Imprint Lithography.”, SPIE Microlithography Conference, Feb. 23, 2003.Applicant
Kanetomo et al., “Robot for Use in Ultrahigh Vacuum.”, Solid State Technology, Aug. 1, 1997, pp. 63-72.Applicant
Kim et al., “Surface Energy and Polarity of Treated Indium-Tin-Oxide Anodes for Polymer Light-Emittng Diodes Studied by Contact Angle Measurements.” Journal of Applied Physics 1999, pp. 2774-2778, vol. 86, No. 5.Applicant
Kim et al., “High-precision Magnetic Levitation Stage for Photolithography.”, Precision Engineering, Apr. 1, 1998, vol. 22., No. 2, pp. 66-77.Applicant
Koseki, “Design and Accuracy Evaluation of High-Speed and High Precision Parallel Mechanism.”, Proc. of IEEE, Jan. 1, 1998, Intl. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, pp. 1340-1345.Applicant
Kotachi et al., “Si-Containing Positive Resist for ArF Excimer Laser Lithography.”, Photopolymer of Science and Technology, Nov. 4, 1995, pp. 615-622.Applicant
Krauss et al., “Fabrication of Nanodevices Using Sub-25 nm Imprint Lithography.”, Appl. Phy. Lett., Jan. 1, 1995, 67(21), pp. 3114-3116.Applicant
Krug et al., “Fine Patterning of Thin Sot-gel Films.”, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, Jan. 1, 1992, 147 & 148, pp. 447-450.Applicant
Lee et al., “An Ultraprecision Stage for Alignment of Wafers in Advanced Microlithography.”, Precision Engineering, Sep. 1, 1997, pp. 113-122.Applicant
Lee et al., “Ultra Precision Positioning System for Servo Motor-piezo Actuator Using the Dual Servo Loop and Digital filter Implementation.”, American Society for Precision Engineering, Jan. 1, 1998, pp. 287-290.Applicant
Lin, “Multi-Layer Resist Systems.”, Introduction to Microlithography, Feb. 14, 1983, pp. 287-349.Applicant
Lucas Aerospace, Free-Flex ® Pivot Catalog, Jan. 1, 1999.Applicant
Mansky et al., “Large-Area Domain Alignment in Block Copolymer Thin Films Using Electric Fields.”, Macromolecules, Jun. 9, 1998, vol. 31, No. 13, pp. 4399-4401.Applicant
McMackin et al., “A Method of Creating a Turbulent Flow of Fluid between a Mold and a Substrate,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/898,034, Filed with USPTO Jul. 23, 2004.Applicant
McMackin et al., “A System of Creating a Turbulent Flow of Fluid between a Mold and a Substrate,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/898,037, Filed with USPTO Jul. 23, 2004.Applicant
McMackin et al., Single Phase Fluid Imprint Lithography Method, U.S. Appl. No. 10/677,639, Filed with USPTO Oct. 16, 2003.Applicant
Merlet, “Parallel Manipulators: State of the Art and Perspectives.”, Advanced Robotics, Jan. 1, 1994, vol. 8, pp. 589-596.Applicant
Mirkin et al., “Emerging Methods for Micro-and-Nanofabrication.”, MRS Bulletin, Jul. 1, 2001, pp. 506-509.Applicant
Mittal, “Precision Motion Control of a Magnetic Suspension Actuator Using a Robust Nonlinear Compensation Scheme.”, IEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics., Dec. 1, 1997, vol. 2., No. 4, pp. 268-280.Applicant
Nerac.Com Retro Search, “Multi-Layer Resists.”, Sep. 2, 2004.Applicant
Nerac.Com Retro Search, “Reduction of Dimension of Contact Holes.”, Aug. 31, 2004.Applicant
Nerac.Com Retro Search, “Trim Etching of Features Formed on an Organic Layer.”, Sep. 2, 2004.Applicant
Nguyen, “Asymmetric Fluid-Structure Dynamics in Nanoscale Imprint Lithography.” The University of Texas at Austin, Aug. 1, 2001, pp. 1-11.Applicant
Ohya et al., “Development of 3-DOF Finger Module for Micro Manipulation.”, Proc. of IEEE, Mar. 1, 1999, Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 894-899.Applicant
Otto et al., “Step and Repeat UV-Nanoimprint Lithography: Material Issues.”, NNTO2 San Francisco, Dec. 11, 2002.Applicant
Papirer et al., “Abstract of the Grafting of Perfluorinated Silanes onto the Surface of Silica: Characterization by Inverse Gas Chromatography.”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 159, Aug. 1, 1993, pp. 238-242.Applicant
Parikh et al., “An Intrinsic Relationship between Molecular Structure in Self-Assembled n-Alkylsiloxane Monolayers and Deposition Temperature.”, Journal of Phys. Chem., Jul. 1, 1994, pp. 7577-7590.Applicant
Paros et al., “How to design Flexure Hinges.”, Machine Design, Nov. 25, 1965, pp. 151-156.Applicant
Peng et al., “Compliant Motion Control of Kinematically Redundant Manipulators.”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Dec. 1, 1993, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 831-837.Applicant
Pernette et al., “Design of Parallel Robots in Microbotics.”, Robotica, Jan. 1, 1997, vol. 15, pp. 417-420.Applicant
Physik Instruments, PI Online-Catalog, 1999 from www.physikinstruments.com.Applicant
Physik Instruments, Product Catalog for Micropositioning, 1997.Applicant
Raibert et al., “Hybrid Position/Force Control of Manipulators.”, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Jun. 1, 1981, vol. 102, pp. 126-133.Applicant
Rong et al., “Design and Analysis of Flexure-Hinge Mechanism Used in Micro-Positioning Stages.”, ASME, Jan. 1, 1994, vol. 2, pp. 979-985.Applicant
Rong et al., “Dynamics of Parallel Mechanism with Direct Compliance Control.”, IEEE, Jan. 1, 1997, pp. 1753-1758.Applicant
Roos et al., “Nanoimprint Lithography with a Commercial 4 Inch Bond System for Hot Embossing.”, Proceedings of SPIE, Oct. 1, 2001, vol. 4343, pp. 427-435.Applicant
Sagiv, “Organized Monolayers by Absorption. 1. Formation and Structure of Oleophobic Mixed Monolayers on Solid Surfaces.”, Journal of American Cheinical Society/102:1, Jan. 2, 1980.Applicant
Scheer et al., “Problems of the Nanoimprinting Technique for Nanometer Scale Pattern Definition.”, J. Vac. Sci. Techno. B., Nov. 1, 1998, pp. 3917-3921.Applicant
Slocum, “Precision Machine Design: Macromachine Design Philosophy and Its Applicability to the Design of Micromachines.”, Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Feb. 4, 1992.Applicant
Sowah, Diamond Used to Break the Mould [online], Sep. 18, 2002, [Retrieved on Sep. 2, 2003.] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http: Http;//eetuk.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=19203691>.Applicant
Sreenivasan et al., “An Imprint Lithography System to Produce a Light to Impinge upon and Polymerize a Liquid in Superimposition with Template Overlay Marks,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/864,214, Filed with USPTO Jun. 9, 2004.Applicant
Srinivasan et al., “Alkyltrichlorosilane-Based Self-Assembled Monolayer Films for Stiction Reduction in Silicon Micromachines.”, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Jun. 1, 1998, vol. 7, No. 2, p. 252-260.Applicant
Stewart, “A Platform With Six Degrees of Freedom.”, Proc Instn Mech Engrs, May 28, 1965, vol. 180, Pt1, No. 15, pp. 371-378.Applicant
Sung et al., “Abstract of Micro/nano-tribological Characteristics of Self-Assembled Monolayer and its Application in Nano-Structure Fabrication”, Elsevier Science B.V., Jul. 1, 2003, vol. 255, No. 7.Applicant
Sung et al., “Micro/nano-tribological Characteristics of Self-Assembled Monolayer and its Application in Nano-Structure Fabrication.”, Elsevier Science B.V., Jul. 1, 2003, vol. 255, No. 7, pp. 808-818.Applicant
Tajbakhsh et al., “Three-Degree-of-Freedom Optic.Mount for Extreme Ultraviolet.”, American Society for Precision Engineering, Jan. 1, 1998, pp. 359-362.Applicant
Tanikawa et al., “Development of Small-sized 3 DOF Finger Module in Micro Hand for Micro Manipulation.”, Proc. of IEEE, Mar. 1, 1999, Intl. conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 876-881.Applicant
Translation of Japanese Patent 02-24848, Jan. 26, 1990.Applicant
Translation of Japanese Patent 02-92603, Apr. 3, 1990.Applicant
Trilogy Systems, “Linear Motors 310.”, wwww.trilogysystems.com, Jan. 1, 2001.Applicant
Vanderbilt University Office of Transfer Technology; VU9730 Specifications for Improved Flexure Device; 2001, 25, 192-199.Applicant
Wang et al., “Passive Compliance versus Active Compliance in Robot-Based Automated Assembly Systems.”, Industrial Robot, Jan. 1, 1998, vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 48-57.Applicant
Williams et al., “Six Degree of Freedom Mag-Lev Stage Development.”, SPIE, Jan. 1, 1997, vol. 3051, pp. 856-867.Applicant
Wu, “Large Area High Density Quantized Magnetic Disks Fabricated Using Nanoimprint Lithography.”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Nov. 1, 1998, B 16(6), pp. 3825-3829.Applicant
Xia et al., “Soft Lithography,”, Annu Rev. Mater Sci. 1998 28: 153-184.Applicant
Xia et al., “Soft Lithography.”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., Jan. 1, 1998, pp. 551-575.Applicant
Chou, Ultrafast and Direct Imprint of Nanostructures in Silicon, Nature, col. 417, (Jun. 2002), pp. 835-837.Applicant
Blomquist et al., Fluorinated Acrylates in making Low-Loss, Low-Birefringence, and Single-Mode Optical Waveguides with Exceptional Thermo-Optic Properties, SPIE Conference on Linear Optical Properties of Waveguides and Fibers, vol. 3799, pp. 266-279 Jul. 1, 1999.Applicant
Eldada et al, Robust Photopolymers for MCM, Board, and Backplane Optical Interconnects, SPIE vol. 3288, pp. 175-191 Jan. 1, 1998.Applicant
Eldada et al., Affordable WDM Components: The Polymer Solution, SPIE vol. 3234, pp. 161-174 Jan. 1, 1998.Applicant
Eldada et al., Advanced Polymer Systems for Optoelectronic Integrated Circuit Applications, SPIE vol. 3006, pp. 344-361 Jan. 1, 1997.Applicant
Hirai et al., Abstract of Mold Surface Treatment for Imprint Lithography, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, pp. 457-462, vol. 14, No. 3 Aug. 1, 2001.Applicant
Roos et al., Abstract of Nanoimprint Lithography with a Commercial 4 Inch Bond System for Hot Embossing, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4343, pp. 427-435 Oct. 1, 2001.Applicant
Sol-Gel Technology, www.chemat.com/html/solgel.html Jan. 14, 2004.Applicant
Sol-Gel Chemistry, www.prsc/usm.edu/mauritz/solgel.html Feb. 2, 2004.Applicant
Hakovirta et al., Optical Properties of Fluorinated Diamond-Like Carbon Films Produced by Pulsed Glow Discharge Plasma Immersion Ion Processing, Journal of Applied Physics 88(3); pp. 1456-1459 Aug. 1, 2000.Applicant
Data Sheet for MAK (Methyl n-Amyl Ketone), www.sp-chem.com/fine—e Jan. 1, 2003.Applicant
Data Sheet for gamma-Glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane, www.powerchemical.net/3100.htm Dec. 5, 2003.Applicant
Silicon or Silica, www.mii.org/Minerals/photosil Mar. 31, 2005.Applicant
Electronic Devices and Circuits, people.deas.harvard.edu/˜jones/es154/lectures/lecture—2/materials/materials.html Mar. 31, 2005.Applicant
International Chemical Safety Card for p-Toluenseulfonic Acid, www.itcilo.it/english/actrav/teleam/osh/ic/104154.htm Dec. 5, 2003.Applicant
Data Sheet for Methyl Amyl Ketone, www.arb.ca.gov/db/solvents/solvent—pages/Ketones-HTML/methyl—amyl.htm Mar. 31, 2005.Applicant
Golden et al., Designing Porous Low-k Dielectrics, www.reed-electronics.com/semiconductor/index.asp?layout=articlePrint&articleID=CA82824 Apr. 6, 2005.Applicant
Padovani et al., Chemically Bonded Porogens in Methylsilsesquioxane: I. Structure and Bonding, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 149 (12) F161-F170 Oct. 16, 2002.Applicant
Wolf et al., Silicion Processing for the VLSI Era, vol. 1—Process Technology, pp. 407-413 Jan. 1, 1986.Applicant
Taniguchi et al., Diamond Nanoimprint Lithography, Nanotechnology, 2002, vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 592-596(5) Jan. 1, 2002.Applicant
Kiyohara et al., Abstract of Plasma Etching of CVD Diamond Films using an ECR-type Oxygen Source, http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0957-4484/10/4/304 Sep. 26, 2003.Applicant
Wolf et al., Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, vol. 1—Process Technology, pp. 541, 542, 544, 564, 565 Jan. 1, 1986.Applicant
Novec Fluorosurfactant FC-4432, http://multimedia.mmm.com/mws/mediawebserver.dyn?333333SQa783cMj3wMj333wyXuFiiiiH-Aug. 4, 2005.Applicant
Abstract of Japanese Patent 61-040845, Feb. 27, 1986.Applicant
Abstract of Japanese Patent 02-248480, Oct. 4, 1990.Applicant
Abstract of Japanese Patent 3-090345, Apr. 16, 1991.Applicant
Abstract of Japanese Patent 09-278490, Oct. 28, 1997.Applicant
Xu et al., Development of Imprint Material for the Step and Flash Imprint Lithography Process, SPIE Microlithography Conference Feb. 1, 2004.Applicant
Nordquist et al., Image Placement Issues for ITO-based Step and Flash Imprint Lithography Templates, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, pp. 695-701, Mar. 1, 2004.Applicant
Resnick et al., Release Layers for Contact and Imprint Lithography, Semiconductor International, pp. 71-80 Jun. 1, 2002.Applicant
U.S. Appl. No. 10/763,885, filed Jan. 23, 2004, Xu et al.Applicant
U.S. Appl. No. 11/012,374, filed Dec. 15, 2004, Xu et al.Applicant
U.S. Appl. No. 11/068,174, filed Feb. 28, 2005, Xu et al.Applicant
Colburn et al., Step and Flash Imprint Lithography for sub-100 nm Patterning, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 3997, pp. 453-457, Jan. 1, 2000.Applicant
Papirer et al., The Grafting of Perfluorinated Silanes onto the Surface of Silica: Characterization by Inverse Gas Chromatography, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 159, pp. 238-242, Aug. 1, 1993.Applicant
Chou et al., Nanoimprint Lithography, Journal of Vacuum Science Technolgoy B 14(16), pp. 4129-4133, Nov. 1, 1996.Applicant
Colburn et al., Development and Advantages of Step-and-Flash Lithography, Solid State Technology, Jul. 1, 2001.Applicant
Colburn et al., Characterization and Modeling of Volumetric and Mechanical Properties for Step and Flash Imprint Lithography Photopolymers, Journal of Vacuum Science Technology. vol. b. 19(6), Nov. 1, 2001.Applicant
Yu et al., Properties of Fluorinated Amorphous Diamond Like Carbon Films by PECVD, Applied Surface Science 219 (3-4); pp. 228-237, Dec. 1, 2003.Applicant
Compon et al., Electroanalysis at Diamond-Like and Doped-Diamond Electrodes, Electroanalysis 15(17); pp. 1349-1363, Sep. 1, 2003.Applicant
Mansano et al., Protective Carbon Layer for Chemical Corrosion of Stainless Steel, Diamond and Related Materials 12 (3-7); pp. 749-752, Mar. 1, 2003.Applicant
Butter et al., Production and Wetting Properties of Fluorinated Diamond-Like Carbon Coatings, Thin Solid Films, 311(1-2); pp. 107-113, Dec. 31, 1997.Applicant
Hakovirta et al., Heat Resistance of Fluorinated Diamond-Like Carbon Films, Diamond and Related Materiasl 10(8); pp. 1486-14911, Aug. 1, 2001.Applicant
Zhu et al., The Improvement of the Oxidation Resistance of TiAl Alloys by Fluorine Plasma-Based Ion Implantation, Surface and Coatings Technology 158; pp. 502-507, Sep. 1, 2002.Applicant
Yao et al., Structural, Mechanical and Hydrophobic Properties of Fluorine-Doped Diamond-Like Carbon Films Synthesized by Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation and Deposition (PIII-D), Applied Surface Science 230; pp. 172-178, Apr. 17, 2004.Applicant
Bailey et al., Step and Flash Imprint Lithography: Defect Analysis, Journal of Vacuum Science, B 19(6), pp. 2806-2810, Nov. 1, 2001.Applicant
Bailey et al., Step and Flash Imprint Lithography: Template Surface Treatment and Defect Analysis, Journal of Vacuum Science, B 18(6), pp. 3572-3577, Nov. 1, 2000.Applicant
Bender et al., Multiple Imprinting in UV-based Nanoimprint Lithography: Related Material Issues, Microelectronic Engineering 61-62, pp. 407-413 Jan. 1, 2002.Applicant
U.S. Appl. No. 11/244,428, naming Inventors Xu et al., entitled Method of Providing Desirable Wetting and Release Characteristics Between a Mold an a Polymerizable Composition, filed Oct. 5, 2005.Applicant
Novec Fluorosurfacants for Paints and Coatings, Nov. 3, 2003.Applicant
Translation of Japanese Patent 61-40845, Feb. 1, 1986.Applicant
Translation of Japanese Patent 02-248480, Oct. 1, 1990.Applicant
Translation of Japanese Patent 03-090345, Apr. 1, 1991.Applicant
Translation of Japanese Patent 09-278490, Oct. 1, 1997.Applicant
Abstract of Japanese Patent 03-090345, Apr. 1, 1991.Applicant
Abstract of Japanese Patent 09-278490, Oct. 1, 1997.Applicant
Yoneda et al., Translation of Japanese Patent 02-248480, Transparent Substrate with Water-Repellent and Antistaining Properties, and Structure Equipped Therewith Oct. 4, 1990.Applicant
Yoneda et al., Translation of Japanese Patent 02-248480, Transparent Substrate Material with Water-Repllent and Anti-Staining Properties and Structure Equipped with Same Oct. 4, 1990.Applicant

Abstract