US 8,024,471 B2Grant
System, method and apparatus for use in monitoring or controlling internet access
Issue Date:2011-09-20
•39 Claims
•13 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A system method and apparatus are provided for use in monitoring or controlling internet access at a client device 12. A request message 500 is generated to request categorization of a specified URL, and a reply message 600 is returned denoting a category of the specified URL amongst a predetermined set of categories. The request message 500 comprises a UDP package including a sequence number, a time stamp, and a data section carrying the specified URL. The reply message 600 comprises a UDP packet and includes the sequence number and the time stamp from the request message 500, and a data section identifying the category. The request message 500 and the reply message 600 are economical and provide efficient communication across a local area network or the Internet 20.
Metadata
Assignee
- Websense UK Limited
Inventors
- John W. Sinclair
- Ian James Pettener
- Alistair H. Nash
Application Information
Application Number:US 10/953,716
Filing Date:2004-09-28
Priority Date:2004-09-09
Art Unit:2444
Classifications
IPC:
G06F15/16G06F15/173H04L12/16
Patent Drawings (13 sheets)
Description
[0001] This application claims priority, under 35 USC §119, from United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB04 20025.9 filed on Sep. 9, 2004, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
[0002] The present invention relates in general to a system, method and apparatus for use in monitoring or controlling Internet access. In particular, the present invention relates to a system, method and apparatus for categorising Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) during Internet access.
[0003] The Internet is a global interconnection of computers and computer networks. One of the great benefits of the Internet is that many millions of users have access to shared information of the World Wide Web, whereby pages of text and graphic information in HTML or other formats are transmitted by a Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP). Each web page has a unique address, known as a Uniform Resource Locator (URL). The Internet and its supporting structures are discussed in detail in Requests for Comments (RFCs), available from www.faqs.org and elsewhere. Reference is made in particular to RFC760 (Internet Protocol) and RFC1738 (Uniform Resource Locators).
[0004] Although the Internet provides access to a vast amount of information, it is widely recognised that open access at all times to all forms of information is not appropriate. For example, many schools and businesses provide Internet access for their students and employees. However, the school or business is, at least in part, responsible for dissemination of information within that organisation and is usually under an obligation to prevent circulation of racist, sexist or other abusive materials. This is just one example situation where there is a strong need for a measure of control over Internet access. Other examples include public spaces such as libraries or Internet cafes or public Internet kiosks. Another example is a home environment, where parents may wish to prevent their children accessing adult oriented web pages.
[0005] Prior art systems are available to address this need for monitoring or controlling access to the Internet. One example system is discussed at U.S. Pat. No. 5,996,011, which describes making a linguistic analysis of a web page on the fly before delivering the web page or selected portions thereof to a user. Other approaches include comparing a requested URL against a previously-determined list of forbidden URLs, known as a “deny list”. However, both of these approaches require relatively large resources, i.e. a computing platform with a relatively fast processor, a large memory, and plenty of storage space such as a hard disk. The World Wide Web currently contains over 200 million websites, with tens of thousands of new sites being added each week. Each site usually contains many individual web pages. As a result, any form of filtering using “deny lists” requires relatively large storage space. Even an on the fly approach as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,996,011 using linguistic analysis requires a relatively large space to store objectionable words or phrases, and requires intensive processor usage in order to maintain reasonable response times.
[0006] A further problem arises in that many computer users are not technically literate. Most computer users are not computer experts and would like to be able to use their computer with a minimum of fuss or problems. Hence, it is desired to provide an apparatus, method and system for monitoring or controlling Internet access which is simple, reliable and user friendly.
[0007] A Local Area Network (LAN) is often used to connect together computers located in one building or site. In this LAN environment access to the Internet is provided though a Proxy Server, which receives and services URL requests from within the LAN by communicating with the Internet. Some of the client computers in this LAN environment may have relatively limited resources, such as a dumb terminal or diskless workstation. Another example is a Personal Digital Assistant or other handheld computing device. In one preferred aspect of the present invention it is desired to provide an apparatus, method and system for monitoring or controlling internet access which is ideally simple, fast and reliable, in this LAN environment.
[0008] Many users, particularly in a small office or home office environment (SOHO) environment, connect to the Internet through an Internet Service Provider (ISP). Typically, the connection is established through dedicated hardware of an Internet gateway appliance such as a modem or a router. However, there is a strong price pressure on Internet gateway appliances and a strong desire to minimise equipment specification. This means minimising processor requirements, memory requirements, and storage requirements, all of which are directly contrary to known approaches for monitoring or controlling Internet access. In a preferred aspect of the present invention it is desired to provide an apparatus, method and system for monitoring or controlling internet access which is ideally simple, fast and reliable, when using an Internet gateway appliance.
[0009] Another emerging need relates to Internet appliances which are created to perform a specific dedicated function whilst also being connected to the Internet. One example is a web TV for displaying audiovisual signals. Such Internet appliances are generally intended for use by consumers who have little or no technical knowledge, by providing a simple and easy to use set of controls as opposed to the fully controllable interface of a regular computer. Again, most Internet appliances are designed to minimise processor, memory and storage requirements. In a preferred aspect of the present invention it is desired to provide an apparatus, method and system for monitoring or controlling internet access which is simple, fast and reliable, when using an Internet appliance.
[0010] An aim of the present invention is to address the disadvantages and problems of the prior art, as discussed above or elsewhere.
[0011] According to the present invention there is provided an apparatus, method and system as set forth in the appended claims. Preferred features of the invention will be apparent from the dependent claims, and the description which follows.
[0012] In one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for use in controlling or monitoring of Internet access by categorising Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), comprising the steps of: receiving a URL request denoting a specified URL; generating a request message to request categorisation of the specified URL; and receiving a reply message denoting a category of the specified URL amongst a predetermined set of categories; wherein: the request message comprises a User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packet and includes a sequence number, a timestamp, and a data section representing the specified URL; and the reply message comprises a UDP packet and includes the sequence number and the timestamp corresponding to the request message, and a data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories.
[0013] Further according to the present invention there is provided a method for use in controlling or monitoring of Internet access at a client device by categorising Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), comprising the steps of: generating a request message to request categorisation of a specified URL, wherein the request message comprises a request message header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and a data section representing the specified URL, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet; and sending the request message to a categorisation server which determines a category of the specified URL amongst a predetermined set of categories, and in reply receiving a reply message comprising a request message header including a sequence number field and a timestamp field each corresponding to the request message, and a data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet.
[0014] According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for use at a categorisation server to assist in controlling or monitoring of Internet access at a client device by categorising Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), comprising the steps of: receiving a request message which requests categorisation of a specified URL, wherein the request message comprises a request message header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and a data section representing the specified URL, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet; and determining a category of the specified URL amongst a predetermined set of categories at the categorisation server, and generating a reply message comprising a request message header including a sequence number field and a timestamp field each corresponding to the received request message, and a data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet; and sending the reply message from the categorisation server for receipt by the client device.
[0015] In another aspect of the invention there is provided a system for use in controlling or monitoring of Internet access by categorising Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), comprising: a client device coupled arranged to monitor or control Internet access according to a category of a specified URL, including generating a request message to request categorisation of the specified URL, wherein the request message comprises a request message header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and a data section representing the specified URL, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet; and a categorisation server communicating with the client device and arranged to receive the request message and determine a category of the specified URL, including generating a reply message comprising a request message header including a sequence number field and a timestamp field each corresponding to the received request message, and a data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet.
[0016] In another aspect of the invention there is provided a client device, comprising: an interface module arranged to present a URL categorisation function, wherein the interface module is passed a specified URL from a client software and returns a categorisation code; an encryption module which encrypts and decrypts data; a protocol module which marshals and unmarshals incoming and outgoing data and makes encryption/decryption calls to the encryption module; and a communication module arranged to send an outgoing request message to a remote categorisation server and to receive and buffer incoming data including a corresponding reply message, wherein: the request message comprises a header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and an encrypted data section representing the specified URL, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet; and the reply message comprises a header section including the sequence number field and the timestamp field from the request message, and an encrypted data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories as determined by the categorisation server, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet.
[0017] In another aspect of the invention there is provided a categorisation server, comprising: a main module arranged to determine a category of a specified URL amongst a set of predetermined categories by comparing the specified URL against stored URLs in a categorisation database; an encryption unit arranged to encrypt and decrypt data; a protocol module arranged to unmarshal incoming data into a comprehensible command format and marshal outgoing data into a transmittable format, and make encryption/decryption calls to the encryption unit; and a communication module arranged to receive and buffer incoming and outgoing data and respond to an incoming categorisation request message including generation of an corresponding outgoing reply message, wherein: the request message comprises a header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and an encrypted data section representing the specified URL, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet; and the reply message comprises a header section including the sequence number field and the timestamp field from the request message, and an encrypted data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories as determined by the main module, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet.
[0018] In a further aspect of the invention there is provided a request message for use in categorising Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), comprising a header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and a data section representing the specified URL, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet
[0019] In a further aspect of the invention there is provided a reply message for use in categorising Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), comprising a header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and a data section identifying a category of a specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet.
[0020] The present invention may, in some embodiments, be implemented as computer software. The invention also extends to a program storage medium having computer executable instructions stored thereon to perform any of the methods described herein.
[0021] For a better understanding of the invention, and to show how embodiments of the same may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings in which:
[0022] FIG. 1 is a schematic overview of a system and apparatus as employed in first preferred embodiments of the present invention;
[0023] FIG. 2 is a schematic overview of a system and apparatus as employed in second preferred embodiments of the present invention;
[0024] FIG. 3 shows an example of a uniform resource locator (URL);
[0025] FIG. 4 shows part of a protocol stack appropriate for communication relating to the Internet;
[0026] FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a preferred method for categorisation of URL requests;
[0027] FIG. 6 shows a preferred format of a request message packet;
[0028] FIG. 7 shows a preferred format of a reply message packet;
[0029] FIG. 8 is a schematic overview of an example client gateway apparatus;
[0030] FIG. 9 is a logical representation of a preferred structure of a category cache;
[0031] FIG. 10 shows example data held within the category cache of FIG. 9 ;
[0032] FIG. 11 is a schematic overview of a preferred categorisation server apparatus;
[0033] FIG. 12 is a schematic overview of a preferred licensing cache structure; and
[0034] FIG. 13 is a schematic overview of preferred licensing systems.
[0035] Referring to FIG. 1 , a schematic overview is shown of a system and apparatus as employed in preferred embodiments of the present invention. In this first example embodiment, a user machine 10 is connected to the Internet 20 through an Internet gateway appliance or client gateway 12.
[0036] The preferred embodiments of the present invention are primarily applicable to the World Wide Web, whereby a web page 32 is provided in response to a URL request sent under HTTP. In use, the user machine 10 provides a web browser application which initiates a URL request 11 in order to obtain content, i.e. a web page 32, from a content server or host 30. The web page 32 may take any suitable form, most commonly being text and graphics in HTML format. It will be appreciated however that the present invention is applicable to other forms of content provided over the Internet using URLs, such as file transfers under FTP or connection to a TELNET server.
[0037] It is desired to passively monitor and log the requested URLs for inspection later, or perform an active filtering function which determines whether the user machine 10 will receive or display the requested web page 32. To this end, it is useful to place URLs into categories. In a simple example, the categories are either “allow” or “deny”. In a more sophisticated example, it is helpful to categorise URLs with greater granularity.
[0038] The preferred embodiments of the present invention place each requested URL into one of a predetermined set of categories. Specific downstream actions for controlling or monitoring Internet access, such as filtering or logging functions, are not particularly relevant to the present invention and may take any suitable form.
[0039] The preferred embodiment provides eight core categories such as “adult/sexual explicit”, “criminal skills”, “drugs, alcohol, tobacco”, “violence” or “weapons”, as well as thirty two productivity-related categories such as “advertisements”, “games”, “hobbies and recreation” or “kids sites”. Providing this predetermined set of categories allows a more sophisticated rules-based filtering or logging function. For example, a rule is used to alert an administrator when a request is made for any of the core categories, or to block selected productivity categories at particular times and allowing access only say at lunchtimes or outside work hours. To cater for all eventualities, the preferred categories may also include “don't know” or “not found” options.
[0040] The user machine 10 provides input and output interface functions appropriate for a human user, suitably including a display screen, speakers, and control keys or GUI. As shown in FIG. 1 , in one embodiment the user machine 10 is a computing platform such as a desktop computer, a laptop computer, or a personal digital assistant (PDA). In another embodiment, the user machine 10 is a function-specific Internet appliance, such as a web-TV. In a third example, the user machine 10 is a public Internet kiosk, in this case also shown as including a voice telephone.
[0041] In one embodiment, the user machine 10 and the client gateway 12 are formed as physically separate devices and communicate by any appropriate wired or wireless link. In other embodiments the client gateway 12 is integrated within the user machine 10.
[0042] As one preferred implementation which is useful particularly in a SOHO type environment, the client gateway 12 suitably includes a modem, such as an analogue, ISDN or ADSL modem, which connects to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 21 over the plain old telephone system (POTS) or other wired or optical network to provide a network layer connection to the Internet 20. As another example, the client gateway 12 connects to the Internet 20 through a wireless network or cellular mobile network such as GSM or GPRS. In still other embodiments, the client gateway 12 connects to the Internet 20 through an intermediary such as a LAN or WAN, optionally over a virtual private network (VPN).
[0043] Referring to FIG. 1 , in a preferred embodiment the client gateway 12 acts as a router and forwards data packets between computers or computer networks. In this illustrated example of FIG. 1 , the client gateway 12 directs packets between the user machine 10 and the ISP 21. Routers typically use packet headers and forwarding tables to determine the best path for forwarding each data packet.
[0044] The client gateway 12 typically has relatively limited computing resources. In one example embodiment, the client gateway is a router having an Intel IXP422 processor, 64 MB RAM and 16 MB of Flash memory. There is no hard disk or other large-capacity storage device within the client gateway. The client gateway may also perform other functions, typically acting as a combined modem, router, firewall, local network switch or VPN client, or any combination thereof. Hence, there is strong competition for resources in order to accommodate some or all of these functions within a single low-cost device.
[0045] It is desired to offer logging or filtering functions at the client gateway 12, because this is a natural control point between the upstream network of the ISP 21, and the downstream network of the user machine 10. The monitoring or controlling function relies, as an initial step, on placing requested URLs into categories. However, as just discussed, a problem arises in that the client gateway 12 typically has only limited available processor, memory and storage resources. Hence, there is a strong need to minimise resources used within the client gateway when providing an Internet access controlling or monitoring function.
[0046] FIG. 2 shows a second example system and apparatus as employed in an alternative embodiment of the present invention.
[0047] Referring to FIG. 2 , a client computer 12 is part of a Local Area Network (LAN) which also includes a proxy server 14 coupled to the Internet 20. The client computer 12 makes URL requests in order to receive web pages from a content server 30 available over the Internet 20. The URL requests are processed through the proxy server 14. It is desired to monitor or control Internet access at the client computer 12. The present invention is particularly applicable where the client computer 12 has relatively limited processor, memory or storage resources, such as a terminal or a diskless workstation.
[0048] Referring now to both FIGS. 1 and 2 , the client 12 (i.e. the client gateway 12 of FIG. 1 or the client computer 12 of FIG. 2 ) sends a request message 500 to a server computer 40 hosting a categorisation service 400. The request message 500 identifies a specified URL, such as extracted from a HTTP URL request. This categorisation server 40 identifies one of the predetermined set of categories appropriate to the specified URL, and sends a reply message 600 to the client 12. The reply message 600 identifies the appropriate category, which the client 12 then employs to perform the desired monitoring or controlling function.
[0049] This arrangement reduces resource requirements at the client 12, and allows the categorisation server 40 to run on a large and powerful computing system with plenty of processing power, memory and storage space. This categorisation service 400 may take any suitable form. For example, upon receiving the URL categorisation request 500, the categorisation service 400 looks up an appropriate category for the specified URL using a category database. Additionally or alternatively, the categorisation service employs a linguistic or other analysis of the specified URLs to determine an appropriate category, with or without human intervention and review.
[0050] A problem arises in that it is desired to reduce delays when requesting a web page 32, while a URL is placed into a predetermined category. Also, in practical embodiments of the present invention, many tens, hundreds or thousands of clients 12 are able to communicate with the categorisation server 40. It is desired to minimise communication traffic. Also, it is desired to minimise overheads both within the client 12, and within the central categorisation server 40.
Message Protocol
[0051] A first aspect of the present invention concerns an improved protocol for communication between first and second computing platforms, in this example between the client 12 and the categorisation server 40, when making requests to place URLs into categories.
[0052] FIG. 3 shows the standard format of a uniform resource locator (URL), as described in detail in RFC1738. The URL 200 includes a host portion 202 and a page portion 204. The host portion 202 identifies a particular host (e.g. “www.host.com”), whilst the page portion gives a path to a specific web page (e.g. “/directory/page.html”). A root page (i.e. “www.host.com/”) at the host is conveniently shown by giving the host portion 202 as “www.host.com” and the page portion 204 as “/”.
[0053] FIG. 4 shows part of a standard protocol stack appropriate for communication relating to the Internet, as described in more detail in RFC760 and elsewhere. The Internet Protocol (IP) interfaces to a local network protocol, and to higher level protocols for communication between network nodes or hosts. The basic function of the Internet Protocol is to move datagrams from a source address to a destination address.
[0054] Various host to host protocols exist, including the hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) which is used to carry URL requests and provide web pages 32 for the World Wide Web. However, HTTP has no mechanism to efficiently carry the request messages 500 and the reply messages 600 for categorisations of URLs as employed by the present invention.
[0055] Also, several messaging protocols have been defined. As examples, FIG. 4 shows a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) as defined for example in RFC761 and a User Datagram Protocol (UDP) as defined for example in RFC768. TCP is ideal for applications which require reliable delivery of data in a specified order. TCP sets up a connection between hosts, which is maintained open for the duration of a session. Whilst reliable, TCP has a relatively large overhead. By contrast, UDP is a fast and lightweight protocol, but is relatively unreliable. In particular, delivery and duplication protection are not guaranteed. UDP is connectionless, with no handshaking or acknowledgements between hosts. Hence, neither of these messaging protocols is suited to carrying requests and replies concerning URL categorisation.
[0056] FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a preferred method for categorisation of URL requests, according to an embodiment of the present invention. A URL request is received at step 401, and a request message 500 is sent at step 402. A reply message 600 is received at step 403, and a URL category is determined at step 404.
[0057] In the present invention, the request message 500 and the reply message 600 are each sent as the payload of a UDP packet. Surprisingly, it has been found that the unreliable and limited messaging capability of UDP can be employed to advantage in the context of categorisation of URLs. However, in order to use UDP, additional steps are taken by the present invention to adapt the protocol. More detailed explanation of the request message 500 and the reply message 600 now follows.
[0058] FIG. 6 shows a preferred format of the request message packet 500, which includes an Ethernet packet header 501, an IP header 502, a UDP header 503, a UDP payload 504, and an Ethernet trailer 505. These are all formatted according to existing protocols.
[0059] As shown in FIG. 6 , the UDP payload 504 is divided to form a request message header section 510 and a request message data section 520.
[0060] The header section 510 comprises a sequence number 511 and a time stamp 512, and suitably a command identity 513, a data size 514, and a licensing field 515.
[0061] The sequence number 511 allows the request message 500 to be uniquely identified and distinguished from other request messages. The sequence number 511 is generated upon creation of the request message 500 within the client 12, suitably as an incremental value circling between 0 and 65535. Under UDP, each client-side socket exists only for the duration of a request-reply cycle and hence each request is assigned a different port value by the host process within, in this example, the client 12. However, there is a possibility that a reply could be passed back to a port of an incorrect waiting thread. The sequence number 511 allows a reply to be matched up with an originating request message 500.
[0062] The time stamp 512 enables calculation of timeouts. The client 12 originating the request message 500 waits a predetermined length of time for a reply message 600, and then re-tries for a predetermined number of times. Preferably, the timeout is increased after each resend, with an exponential back off (e.g. 2, 4 and then 8 seconds for a maximum retry count of 3).
[0063] The sequence number 511 and the time stamp 512 together provide excellent reliability, whilst adding only minimal overhead.
[0064] The command ID field 513 allows the request message to perform different command functions. In most cases, the command ID is set to “1” in order to request categorisation of a URL. Also, the request message uses a command ID of “2” to request that the categorisation server 40 provide a current list of categories, or a command ID of “3” to confirm a current list version and determine whether an update is required. Other commands can be defined as appropriate. Hence, the command ID field 513 brings increased flexibility and allows the system to perform additional functions.
[0065] The data section 520 contains data representing a specified URL 200. The URL data 520 includes a host portion 202 and, where appropriate, a URL path portion 204. The request data 520 is encrypted, preferably with a secret-key block encryption algorithm such as RC2 which is described in detail at RFC2268. Encryption of the data section 520 improves security and privacy. However, encrypting only the data section 520 minimises both encryption workload and transmission overhead. The size of the encrypted data section 520 is stored as the data size field 514 in the request header 510
[0066] The licensing field 515 optionally transmits a licence identity relevant to the originator of the request message 500. The licence identity is suitably associated with the client 12 or optionally the user machine 10.
[0067] FIG. 7 is a schematic representation of a reply message 600 as generated by the categorisation server 40 and sent to the client 12. The reply message 600 includes a UDP payload comprising a response header 610 and a response data section 620. The response header 610 comprises a sequence number 611 and a time stamp 612, preferably with a command ID 613, all copied from a corresponding received categorisation request message 500.
[0068] A data size 614 gives a size of the following response data section 620. A status code 615 denotes a status. This is usually simply “success”, but occasionally relates to one of a predetermined set of error statuses.
[0069] The response data 620 is formatted according to the relevant command ID 613 and is preferably encrypted, such as with RC2. In response to a request to categorise URL, the response data 620 comprises a category 621, a match length 622, and an exact flag 623. The category 621 identifies one amongst a predetermined set of categories for the URL sent in the request data 520, suitably as a numerical value (e.g. category “27” is say sports related web pages). The exact flag 623 determines whether the requested URL 520 was matched exactly. If only a partial match was obtained, such as a match with only the host portion 202 or only part of the URL path 204, then a match length is given in the match length field 622. The match length determines a number of characters of the specified URL 520 which were matched with a stored URL at the server 40. The character count is taken along the host portion 202 or the path portion 204, or both. In the preferred embodiment, the count is taken along the path portion 204 only. A match on the root page “/” counts as one character.
[0070] In response to other command types, the response data 620 contains other data such as a category list specifying a predetermined list of categories, or a version identity which identifies a current version of the category list being used by the categorisation server 40. These other command types can be used to trigger software or configuration updates at the client 12.
[0071] As shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 , the request message 500 and reply message 600 each use the payload section of a UDP packet, which usually has a maximum size of 65 Kb as defined by the MTU (Maximum Transmission Unit) of the network. By contrast, the Ethernet physical layer packet has a maximum size of just 1500 bytes. Even so, in the present invention almost all of the request and reply messages 500,600 for categorisation of URLs fit within the very limited size constraints of a single Ethernet packet, thus avoiding fragmentation.
[0072] FIG. 8 shows the client 12 in more detail, including an interface module 121, a communication module 122, a protocol module 123 and an encryption module 124. The interface module 121 presents the URL categorisation function to a client application, such as to a web browser or a HTTP function (not shown). The interface is suitably an API (application programming interface) to the client software. The interface module 121 is passed a URL from the client software, and returns a categorisation code 621, preferably with a match length 622 and an exact flag 623. The communication module 122 sends outgoing data to the categorisation server 40 and receives and buffers incoming data, including making retransmission requests as necessary. The protocol module 123 interprets the incoming and outgoing data according to the protocol discussed above with reference to FIGS. 5 , 6 & 7 and makes encryption/decryption calls to the encryption module 124. The encryption module 124 encrypts and decrypts data.
[0073] In the preferred embodiment, the communication module 122 calculates a retransmission timeout for every sent request. To be effective, it is desired that the timeout interval take account of vastly varying network conditions, and adapt accordingly. This helps to eliminate both unnecessary retransmissions and unrealistically high timeout periods. Optionally, the number of retries is configurable such as through a user interface.
[0074] The preferred method for calculating the re-transmission timeout “rto” includes (a) measuring the round-trip time “mt” for each request, (b) maintaining a estimate of the smoothed round-trip time “srtt”, and (c) maintaining an estimate of the smoothed mean deviation “smd”. The estimates are calculated as:
srtt′=srtt+(abs(mt−srtt)/8)
smd′=smd+((abs(mt−srtt)−smd)/4)
srtt′=srtt+(abs(mt−srtt)/8)
smd′=smd+((abs(mt−srtt)−smd)/4)
[0075] From these estimates, the timeout value is calculated as:
rto=srtt+4(smd)
rto=srtt+4(smd)
[0076] Advantageously, this formula is quickly calculated using fixed-point arithmetic and bit shifts.
[0077] If any time-out period rto expires, then next timeout is exponentially increased by:
rto′=rto*2
rto′=rto*2
[0078] The preferred embodiment of the present invention has many advantages, including in particular minimising overhead when requesting categorisation of URL requests and minimising workload at the gateway appliance 12. The preferred embodiment employs UDP for speed and simplicity, whilst adding a sequence number and time stamp to improve reliability.
Cache
[0079] In another aspect of the present invention, it is desired to further reduce network traffic over the Internet 20 when placing requested URLs into categories.
[0080] FIG. 8 shows that the client 12 preferably comprises a category cache 125. The category cache 125 stores URL categories by storing response data 620 from each categorisation request 500. Since users often navigate to a limited set of favourite web pages time and again, the category cache 125 significantly reduces traffic over the Internet 20 by avoiding duplication of requests for categorisation of the same URL or a child page from the same host or directory.
[0081] FIG. 9 is a logical representation showing a preferred structure of the category cache 125. The cache is structured for both lookups of stored URLs, and also for aging of the cache to ensure that the cache remains within a predetermined maximum memory size. These two functions, namely lookup and aging, are combined so that both share the same nodes in the cache structure, which reduces cache size requirements. As will be discussed in more detail below, the cache 125 is compact and so occupies only a relatively small footprint within the memory of the client 12, whilst still recording valuable data in a manner that is readily searchable and updateable.
[0082] Referring again to FIG. 5 , the method of the present invention preferably includes the step 405 of adding the determined URL category to the category cache 125.
[0083] In FIG. 9 , the cache structure comprises a hash array 810, and combined host trees and age list 820. The host portion 202 of each URL is hashed to produce an index 811 in the hash array 810. Many hosts may produce the same hash index 811, and each array element is a pointer to a root tree node of a host tree 820. Hosts with the same hash are searched through the host tree 820, which is preferably a balanced red-black tree where each node has a red/black bit to colour the node red or black. There are n internal nodes and the tree 820 has a height of at most 2 log2(n+1) so that no leaf is more than twice as far from the root as any other. This is just one example tree structure and many other tree structures are applicable in embodiments of the present invention.
[0084] Each node 821 comprises a host string 822 holding a host portion 202, and optionally an array of pages 823 for the specified host 822. Left and right pointers 825, 826 are used for searching the tree 820. Each node also includes next and previous pointers 827,828 which refer to a next (older) node and a previous (newer) node, respectively, for aging. Also, each node includes a parent node pointer 824 to allow for fast node deletions.
[0085] As also shown in FIG. 9 , the next and previous node pointers 827,828 allow the nodes to be arranged in order by age. New nodes are added to the head of the age list, and old nodes are removed from the tail. When the cache is full and has reached a predetermined maximum size, the oldest node is removed to make room for a new URL to be added in a new host node. Conveniently, the age list is refreshed, in order to keep the most recently accessed nodes at the head of the age list.
[0086] In a preferred embodiment, the memory footprint of the category cache 125 is configured in bytes, in order to determine the maximum size occupied by the hash array 810 and tree list 820. The size may be configured in use through a control panel, or determined automatically according to needs of the client and thereby balance available resources amongst neighbouring functions.
[0087] The hash array 810 has a predetermined length, which is ideally a prime number for better hash distribution. The hash array length is suitably dynamically configurable, such as by being a variable which is input from a control panel during use. A longer hash array yields faster categorisations, but uses more memory. As examples, the hashing algorithm is suitably MD4 or MD5.
[0088] In use, a URL host portion 202 and a URL path 204 are extracted from a URL request 11 within HTTP or equivalent. The host portion 202 is hashed to determine an index 811 in the hash array 810, and the respective host tree 820 is searched to locate a node 821 matching the host portion 202. The URL path portion 204 is then searched against the page array 823.
[0089] FIG. 10 shows example data held in the host string 822 and the page array 823. The host string 822 includes the host portion 902. In some embodiments, a category code 906 and a children flag 908 are provided for the host, or else these can be presented in a root page. The page array includes, for the or each page, a page string 904, a category code 906 for that page or directory, and a children flag 908.
[0090] In this example of FIG. 10 , the host is “www.host.com” and a searched URL path is “/directory—1/page—1”. The entry for the page string 904 “/directory—1” has a children flag 908 of “yes” which shows that specific category codes are available for children of this path. The cache shows that “/directory—1/page—9” has already been cached, but there is currently no entry for the searched page string “/directory—1/page—1”. In this example, the cache 125 has failed to provide a category for the requested URL. A request message 500 is generated to determine the code for the specified URL, i.e. for host “www.host.com” and the path “/directory—1/page—1”.
[0091] As a second example, assume that the children flag 908 for the page “/directory—1” is set to “no”, which allows a cache result to be returned with confidence for the searched page based on a partial match. For example, if the children flag for “/directory—1” is set to “no”, then a confident category code is returned for the requested “/directory—1/page—1” based on a partial match with “/directory—1” as a parent of the requested child page.
[0092] The cache 125 is suitably built by storing data from request messages 500 and reply messages 600. The request message 500 identifies the specified URL with the host portion 202 and the page portion 204 conveniently provided as a delimited character string. The host portion 202 forms the host string 902. The exact flag 623 determines the children flag 908. The match length field 622 determines a truncation point for the specified URL as a number of characters. The truncated URL is then added to the category cache. For example, the specified URL “www.host.com/directory—1/page—1/sub_page3” is truncated with an exact match at 19 characters to be stored as host=“www.host.com” and page string=“/directory—1/page—1”. The category code field 621 provides the category code 906.
[0093] Referring again to FIG. 8 , the gateway appliance 12 preferably further includes a custom cache 126 alongside the category cache 125. The custom cache 126 records a customised list of categorisations. In preferred embodiments, the custom cache 126 is used to override other categorisations, or to add supplementary URLs. In the preferred embodiment, the custom cache 126 is structured identical to the category cache 125. Searches are preferably conducted in order through the custom cache 126, then if necessary the category cache 125, and finally if necessary by generating a request message 500 to the categorisation server 40. Preferably, the custom cache 126 does not perform any URL aging, so that a user has full control over the size and content of the custom cache 126. In this case, the previous and next pointers 827,828 are not required or are left unused.
[0094] In the preferred embodiment, the category cache 125 and/or the custom cache 126 can be cleared completely and then rebuilt with fresh data, such as after a reset operation. Preferably, each cache 125,126 may also be given a partial clear out, such as deleting all hosts 822 or pages 823 with a specified category code. The cache structure described with reference to FIGS. 8 and 9 enables convenient cache management, whilst being efficient to operate.
[0095] FIG. 11 is a schematic view of the categorisation server 40 including a main module 410, a communication module 420, a protocol module 430 and an encryption module 440. The main module 410 initialises the categorisation service and creates worker threads. The communication module 420 receives and buffers data and responds to categorisation requests including generation of reply messages 600. The protocol module 430 unmarshals incoming data into a comprehensible command format and marshals outgoing data into a transmittable format, and makes encryption/decryption calls to the encryption unit 440 where required. The encryption unit 440 encrypts and decrypts data, preferably according to the RC2 algorithm.
Licensing
[0096] In a further aspect of the present invention, the categorisation service 400 running on the categorisation server 40 performs a licensing process.
[0097] In particular, it is desired to confirm that the request message 500 is valid and comes from a valid client device 10,12. This licensing process controls access to the categorisation service, such as for security and to enable paid-for subscription based implementations.
[0098] The licensing process employed in the preferred embodiments of the present invention is highly flexible and is readily integrated with other existing licensing mechanisms.
[0099] As shown above in FIG. 6 , the header 510 of each request message 500 preferably includes a licensing field 515 which carries data such as a licence key.
[0100] In the preferred embodiment, the licensing field 515 is subdivided into a partner ID field 516 and a client ID field 517. The partner ID field 516 allows a plurality of different licensing schemes to exist in parallel, each having different requirements or validation processes.
[0101] Referring again to FIG. 11 , the categorisation service 400 comprises a licensing module 450 associated with the main module 410, which performs validation of the supplied licensing field 515. In the preferred embodiment, the licensing module 450 receives the licensing field 515 and returns a “licence valid” or “licence invalid” status which controls whether or not the categorisation server 40 will respond to a categorisation request message 500. Suitably, the licensing module 450 runs as a dynamically linked library (DLL).
[0102] In a further preferred embodiment, the categorisation service 400 includes a plurality of licensing DLLs 450, one of which is called to validate the licensing field 515 according to the partner ID field 516. This allows different licensing schemes to be applied for different clients.
[0103] In the preferred embodiment, the partner ID field 516 is 4 bytes long, giving up to 65535 licensing partner identities. The client ID field 517 is suitably up to 60 printable characters long, allowing room for any appropriate secure licensing mechanism.
[0104] It is important to validate licenses relatively quickly, since the system is operating in real time and a user is waiting for their requested web page. As show in FIG. 11 , the categorisation server 40 preferably comprises a license cache 455 to store recently encountered license fields 515. The licensing process comprises first checking whether the received licensing field 515 is stored in the licensing cache 455, and then calling the licensing validation DLL 450. Suitably, the result of each licensing call is then added to the licensing cache 455 and is then available for subsequent requests from that client 12. Since clients tend to access the Internet in short burst of activity, it is likely that one categorisation request 500 will be followed by another soon after. The license cache 455 significantly improves response speed for second and subsequent requests.
[0105] FIG. 12 is a schematic overview of the structure of the licensing cache 455. The structure is similar to that of the category cache 125 as discussed above with reference to FIG. 9 .
[0106] As shown in FIG. 12 , the licensing cache 455 comprises a hash array 1210 and one or more combined license trees and age list 1220. The hash array 1210 comprises index elements 1211 as a hash of license keys from the licensing field 515, each of which is a pointer to a licence tree list 1220.
[0107] Each tree node 1221 comprises a license string 1222 holding a license key and a corresponding license result (e.g. valid or invalid). The cache can hold solely valid keys, solely invalid keys, or, as in this example, a mixture of both, according to the circumstances of a particular implementation.
[0108] Further, each tree node 1221 comprises parent, left and right pointers 1223,1224,1225 defining the tree structure. This example shows a balanced red/black tree using a red/black flag 1228.
[0109] The license trees 1220 also functions as an age list to list each of the tree nodes 1221 by age. The age list comprises, within each tree node 1221, a next pointer 1226 and a previous pointer 1227 which refer to a next older tree node and a previous newer tree node, respectively.
[0110] Ideally, the license cache 455 is actively managed to reside within a predetermined memory size. Older tree nodes 1221 are deleted from a tail of the age list by referring to the next and previous pointers 1226,1227, whilst new nodes are added to the head of the age list. Optionally, the age list is updated after each access to keep recently accessed nodes at the head of the list.
[0111] In order to maintain valid content, the license cache is preferably flushed, in whole or in part, such as at scheduled regular timed intervals or following triggering events such as a reset.
[0112] FIG. 13 shows example licensing schemes in more detail.
[0113] The categorisation service 400 makes calls to a license interface DLL 1350, which in turn makes calls one of a plurality of partner licence DLLs 1360.
[0114] The license interface DLL 1350 optionally includes the license cache 455. Preferably, the licence interface DLL first consults the licence cache 455 and then, if necessary, request licence validation by one of the partner licence DLLs 1360.
[0115] In this preferred embodiment, the license interface DLL 1350 resolves the partner ID field 516 by referring to a partner map database 1352, which links the partner ID 516 to a partner DLL name and preferably provides configuration information for making calls into that DLL.
[0116] In FIG. 12 , the partner licence DLLs 1360 include a no license DLL 1361 which simply indicates that any licence key is valid. This allows the system to run a default “no problem” licence mode prior to implementation of licence schemes which actively validate licence keys.
[0117] As one option, a no database DLL 1362 performs a mathematical, algorithmic or cryptographic validation of the licence key.
[0118] As another option, a hosted licensing DLL 1364 is provided which forwards licensing requests to a remote licensing server 1370 for validation. As examples, the licensing requests are sent over a local area network (LAN), or are forwarded using a SOAP-based web service over the Internet 20.
[0119] As yet another option, a database licensing DLL 1366 connects directly into an ODBC database 1380 using a stored procedure to validate the licence key. The database 1380 suitably stores the partner ID field 516, licence code 517, and expiry date of valid licenses and hence can offer validation for a plurality of partner licence schemes. A licence management interface 1382 is provided to manage the content of the licence database 1380.
[0120] This aspect of the present invention has many advantages, as discussed above. Licensing is very useful in the context of controlling or monitoring Internet access by categorisation of URLs, and opens up many useful commercial and technical implementations of this technology. Further, the use of a licensing cache reduces time and resources for each validation and increases throughput. The cache is structured to be compact and is easily managed. The use of a partner ID field allows great flexibility and convenience to choose between available licensing schemes.
[0121] Although a few preferred embodiments have been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications might be made without departing from the scope of the invention, as defined in the appended claims.
[0122] Attention is directed to all papers and documents which are filed concurrently with or previous to this specification in connection with this application and which are open to public inspection with this specification, and the contents of all such papers and documents are incorporated herein by reference.
[0123] All of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), and/or all of the steps of any method or process so disclosed, may be combined in any combination, except combinations where at least some of such features and/or steps are mutually exclusive.
[0124] Each feature disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings) may be replaced by alternative features serving the same, equivalent or similar purpose, unless expressly stated otherwise. Thus, unless expressly stated otherwise, each feature disclosed is one example only of a generic series of equivalent or similar features.
[0125] The invention is not restricted to the details of the foregoing embodiment(s). The invention extends to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), or to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the steps of any method or process so disclosed.
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. A method for controlling or monitoring Internet access by categorizing Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), comprising the steps of:
receiving a URL request denoting a specified URL;
generating a categorization request message to request categorization of the specified URL, wherein generating the request comprises generating a unique value to distinguish the categorization request message for the specified URL from other categorization request messages;
receiving a reply message denoting a category of the specified URI amongst a predetermined set of categories;
wherein:
the categorization request message comprises a User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packet having a payload that includes the unique value, a timestamp, and a data section representing the specified URL; and
the reply message comprises a UDP packet having a payload that includes the unique value and the timestamp corresponding to the categorization request message, and a data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories;
calculating a timeout with reference to the timestamp; resending the categorization request message upon expiry of the timeout; and resending the categorization request message a predetermined number of times, and increasing the timeout between each resend; wherein the predetermined number of times is reconfigurable during use.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating the unique value as an incremental numerical value to distinguish the categorization request message from other categorization request messages.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising matching the reply message against the categorization request message according to the unique value.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising copying the unique value and the timestamp from the categorization request message into the reply message.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the reply message data section comprises a categorization code identifying a category, a match length that determines a character string length of the specified URL which matched against a stored URL, and an exact flag to denote whether the specified URL was matched exactly against a stored URL.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising encrypting the categorization request message data section.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising encrypting the reply message data section.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein: the categorization request message further comprises a data size field to specify a size of the categorization request message data section, and the reply message further comprises a data size field to specify a size of the reply message data section.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the categorization request message comprises a command identity field to identify a command amongst a predetermined set of commands, and the reply message is generated according to the identified command.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is applied in a computer network comprising a client device and a categorization server, and the method comprises:
receiving the URL request for a specified URL at the client device and in response generating the categorization request message to request categorization of the specified URL; and
transmitting the categorization request message to the categorization server, and receiving at the client device the reply message that was generated at the categorization server.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the client device and the categorization server communicate over the Internet, and the method comprises transmitting the categorization request message over the Internet and receiving the reply message over the Internet.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the client device comprises a user machine to provide a human-oriented user interface, and a client internet gateway appliance to couple the user machine to the Internet through an Internet Service Provider (ISP), and the method comprises:
initiating the URL request in the user machine to request a web page from the specified URL; and
servicing the URL request at the client internet gateway appliance, including requesting the web page from a host according to the specified URL.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the user machine and the client internet gateway appliance are formed within a single integrated device.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein the user machine and the client internet gateway appliance are separate devices arranged to communicate over a local network.
15. The method of claim 10, wherein the client device and the categorization server are arranged to communicate over a local area network.
16. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of monitoring or controlling Internet access according to the identified category of the specified URL.
17. A method for use in controlling or monitoring of Internet access at a client device by categorizing Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), comprising the steps of:
generating a categorization request message to request categorization of a specified URL, wherein the categorization request message comprises a request message header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and a data section representing the specified URL, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet and wherein generating the categorization request message header comprises generating the sequence number field as an incremental numerical value to distinguish the categorization request message for the specified URL from other categorization request messages;
sending the categorization request message to a categorization server which determines a category of the specified URL amongst a predetermined set of categories, and in reply receiving a reply message comprising a request message header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field each having contents corresponding to those of the respective fields of the categorization request message, and a data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet;
calculating a timeout period with reference to the timestamp;
resending the categorization request message one or more times upon expiry of the or each successive timeout period; and
resending the categorization request message a predetermined number of times, and increasing the timeout between each resend;
wherein the predetermined number of times is reconfigurable during use.
18. The method of claim 17, further comprising matching the reply message against the categorization request message according to the sequence number field.
19. The method of claim 17, wherein the reply message data section comprises a categorization code which identifies a category, and a match length that determines a character string length of the specified URL which matched against a stored URL in a categorization database at the categorization server.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the reply message data section further comprises an exact flag to denote whether the specified URL was matched exactly against the stored URL.
21. The method of claim 17, further comprising encrypting the data section before sending the categorization request message, and decrypting the data section of a received reply message.
22. The method of claim 17, further comprising passing the identified category from the reply message to a function for monitoring or controlling Internet access according to the identified category of the specified URL.
23. A method for use at a categorization server to assist in controlling or monitoring of Internet access at a client device by categorizing Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), comprising the steps of:
receiving a categorization request message which requests categorization of a specified URL, wherein the categorization request message comprises a request message header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and a data section representing the specified URL, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet and wherein the sequence number field comprises an incremental numerical value that distinguishes the categorization request message for the specified URL from other categorization request messages; and
determining a category of the specified URL amongst a predetermined set of categories at the categorization server, and generating a reply message comprising a reply message header including a sequence number field and a timestamp field each having contents corresponding to those of the respective fields of the received categorization request message, and a data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet;
sending the reply message from the categorization server for receipt by the client device;
calculating a timeout with reference to the timestamp;
resending the reply message upon expiry of the timeout; and
resending the reply message a predetermined number of times, and increasing the timeout between each resend;
wherein the predetermined number of times is reconfigurable during use.
24. The method of claim 23, further comprising sending the reply message as a UDP packet over Internet Protocol.
25. The method of claim 24, further comprising directly copying the sequence number and the timestamp from the categorization request message into the reply message.
26. The method of claim 23, further comprising extracting the specified URL from the data section of the categorization request message, and searching a categorization database to determine a category code for the specified URL.
27. The method of claim 26, further comprising generating the reply message data section including the category code for the specified URL, a match length that determines a character string length of the specified URL which matched against a stored URL in the categorization database, and an exact flag to denote whether the specified URL was matched exactly against the stored URL.
28. The method of claim 23, further comprising decrypting the data section of a received categorization request message, and encrypting the data section before sending the reply message.
29. A system for use in controlling or monitoring of Internet access by categorizing Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), comprising:
a client device comprising a processor controlled device configured to monitor or control Internet access according to a category of a specified URL, including generating a categorization request message to request categorization of the specified URL, wherein the categorization request message comprises a request message header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and a data section representing the specified URL, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet wherein the client device is configured to generate the sequence number field as an incremental numerical value to distinguish the categorization request message for the specified URL from other categorization request messages; and
a categorization server comprising a processor controlled device configured to communicate with the client device and arranged to receive the categorization request message and determine a category of the specified URL, including generating a reply message comprising a request message header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field each having contents corresponding to those of the respective fields of the received categorization request message, and a data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet;
wherein the client device is further configured to:
calculate a timeout with reference to the timestamp; resend the categorization request message upon expiry of the timeout; and
resend the categorization request message a predetermined number of times, and increase the timeout between each resend;
wherein the predetermined number of times is reconfigurable during use.
30. A non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon which when executed provide:
an interface module arranged to present a URL categorization function, wherein the interface module is passed a specified URL from a client software and returns a categorization code;
an encryption module which encrypts and decrypts data;
a protocol module which marshals and unmarshals incoming and outgoing data and makes encryption/decryption calls to the encryption module; and
a communication module arranged to send an outgoing categorization request message to a remote categorization server and to receive and buffer incoming data including a corresponding reply message, wherein:
the categorization request message comprises a header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and an encrypted data section representing the specified URL, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet and wherein the sequence number field comprises an incremental numerical value that distinguishes the categorization request message for the specified URL from other categorization request messages; and
the reply message comprises a header section including the sequence number field and the timestamp field having contents corresponding to those of the respective fields of the categorization request message, and an encrypted data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories as determined by the categorization server, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet; wherein the communication module is further arranged to:
calculate a timeout with reference to the timestamp;
resend the categorization request message upon expiry of the timeout; and
resend the categorization request message a predetermined number of times, and increase the timeout between each resend;
wherein the predetermined number of times is reconfigurable during use.
31. A non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 30, wherein the client device comprises a router or a modem to couple the client device to the Internet through an Internet Service Provider.
32. A non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 30, wherein the client device comprises a client computer communicating with the categorization server over a local area network.
33. A non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon which when executed provide:
a main module arranged to determine a category of a specified URL amongst a set of predetermined categories by comparing the specified URL against stored URLs in a categorization database;
an encryption unit arranged to encrypt and decrypt data;
a protocol module arranged to unmarshal incoming data into a comprehensible command format and marshal outgoing data into a transmittable format, and make encryption/decryption calls to the encryption unit; and
a communication module arranged to receive and buffer incoming and outgoing data and respond to an incoming categorization request message including generation of an corresponding outgoing reply message, wherein:
the categorization request message comprises a header section including a sequence number field and a timestamp field, and an encrypted data section representing the specified URL, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet and wherein the sequence number field comprises an incremental numerical value that distinguishes the categorization request message for the specified URL from other categorization request messages; and
the reply message comprises a header section including the sequence number field contents and the timestamp field contents from the categorization request message, and an encrypted data section identifying a category of the specified URL amongst the predetermined set of categories as determined by the main module, wherein the header section and the data section are the payload of a UDP packet;
wherein the communication module is further arranged to:
calculate a timeout with reference to the timestamp;
resend the categorization request message upon expiry of the timeout; and
resend the categorization request message a predetermined number of times, and increase the timeout between each resend; wherein the predetermined number of times is reconfigurable during use.
34. A non-transitory program storage medium having computer executable instructions stored thereon which, when executed, perform the method of claim 1.
35. A non-transitory program storage medium having computer executable instructions stored thereon which, when executed, perform the method of claim 17.
36. A non-transitory program storage medium having computer executable instructions stored thereon which, when executed, perform the method of claim 23.
37. The method of claim 1, wherein the categorization request message comprises a licensing identity associated with the client.
38. The method of claim 37, wherein the categorization request message comprises a partner ID and a client ID field.
39. The method of claim 29, wherein the categorization server comprises a licensing cache, the licensing cache comprising a hash of license keys to license tree lists.
Patent Citations (242)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4423414(A) | 1983-12-01 | Bryant et al. | Applicant |
| US4734036(A) | 1988-03-01 | Kasha | Applicant |
| US4941084(A) | 1990-07-01 | Terada et al. | Applicant |
| US5408642(A) | 1995-04-01 | Mann | Applicant |
| US5493692(A) | 1996-02-01 | Theimer et al. | Applicant |
| US5541911(A) | 1996-07-01 | Nilakantan et al. | Applicant |
| US5548729(A) | 1996-08-01 | Akiyoshi et al. | Applicant |
| US5555376(A) | 1996-09-01 | Theimer et al. | Applicant |
| US5581703(A) | 1996-12-01 | Baugher et al. | Applicant |
| US5586121(A) | 1996-12-01 | Moura et al. | Applicant |
| US5606668(A) | 1997-02-01 | Shwed | Applicant |
| US5648965(A) | 1997-07-01 | Thadani et al. | Applicant |
| US5678041(A) | 1997-10-01 | Baker et al. | Applicant |
| US5682325(A) | 1997-10-01 | Lightfoot et al. | Applicant |
| US5696486(A) | 1997-12-01 | Poliquin et al. | Applicant |
| US5696898(A) | 1997-12-01 | Baker et al. | Applicant |
| US5699513(A) | 1997-12-01 | Feigen et al. | Applicant |
| US5706507(A) | 1998-01-01 | Schloss | Applicant |
| US5712979(A) | 1998-01-01 | Graber et al. | Applicant |
| US5724576(A) | 1998-03-01 | Letourneau | Applicant |
| US5768519(A) | 1998-06-01 | Swift et al. | Applicant |
| US5774668(A) | 1998-06-01 | Choquier | Applicant |
| US5781801(A) | 1998-07-01 | Flanagan et al. | Applicant |
| US5787253(A) | 1998-07-01 | McCreery et al. | Applicant |
| US5787427(A) | 1998-07-01 | Benantar et al. | Applicant |
| US5796944(A) | 1998-08-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US5799002(A) | 1998-08-01 | Krishnan | Applicant |
| US5801747(A) | 1998-09-01 | Bedard | Applicant |
| US5826014(A) | 1998-10-01 | Coley et al. | Applicant |
| US5828833(A) | 1998-10-01 | Belville et al. | Applicant |
| US5828835(A) | 1998-10-01 | Isfeld et al. | Applicant |
| US5832212(A) | 1998-11-01 | Cragun et al. | Applicant |
| US5832228(A) | 1998-11-01 | Holden et al. | Applicant |
| US5832503(A) | 1998-11-01 | Malik et al. | Applicant |
| US5835722(A) | 1998-11-01 | Bradshaw et al. | Applicant |
| US5835726(A) | 1998-11-01 | Shwed et al. | Applicant |
| US5842040(A) | 1998-11-01 | Hughes et al. | Applicant |
| US5848233(A) | 1998-12-01 | Radia et al. | Applicant |
| US5848412(A) | 1998-12-01 | Rowland et al. | Applicant |
| US5850523(A) | 1998-12-01 | Gretta, Jr. | Applicant |
| US5855020(A) | 1998-12-01 | Kirsch | Applicant |
| US5864683(A) | 1999-01-01 | Boebert et al. | Applicant |
| US5884033(A) | 1999-03-01 | Duvall et al. | Applicant |
| US5884325(A) | 1999-03-01 | Bauer et al. | Applicant |
| US5889958(A) | 1999-03-01 | Willens | Applicant |
| US5892905(A) | 1999-04-01 | Brandt et al. | Applicant |
| US5896502(A) | 1999-04-01 | Shieh et al. | Applicant |
| US5899995(A) | 1999-05-01 | Millier et al. | Applicant |
| US5911043(A) | 1999-06-01 | Duffy et al. | Applicant |
| US5937404(A) | 1999-08-01 | Csaszar et al. | Applicant |
| US5941947(A) | 1999-08-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US5944794(A) | 1999-08-01 | Okamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US5950195(A) | 1999-09-01 | Stockwell et al. | Applicant |
| US5958015(A) | 1999-09-01 | Dascalu | Applicant |
| US5961591(A) | 1999-10-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US5968176(A) | 1999-10-01 | Nessett et al. | Applicant |
| US5978807(A) | 1999-11-01 | Mano et al. | Applicant |
| US5983270(A) | 1999-11-01 | Abraham et al. | Applicant |
| US5987606(A) | 1999-11-01 | Cirasole et al. | Applicant |
| US5987611(A) | 1999-11-01 | Freund | Applicant |
| US5991807(A) | 1999-11-01 | Schmidt et al. | Applicant |
| US5996011(A) | 1999-11-01 | Humes | Applicant |
| US6052723(A) | 2000-04-01 | Ginn | Applicant |
| US6052730(A) | 2000-04-01 | Felciano et al. | Applicant |
| US6055564(A) | 2000-04-01 | Phaal | Applicant |
| US6065056(A) | 2000-05-01 | Bradshaw et al. | Applicant |
| US6065059(A) | 2000-05-01 | Shieh et al. | Applicant |
| US6070242(A) | 2000-05-01 | Wong et al. | Applicant |
| US6073239(A) | 2000-06-01 | Dotan | Applicant |
| US6085241(A) | 2000-07-01 | Otis | Applicant |
| US6092194(A) | 2000-07-01 | Touboul | Applicant |
| US6105027(A) | 2000-08-01 | Schneider et al. | Applicant |
| US6154741(A) | 2000-11-01 | Feldman | Applicant |
| US6173364(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Zenchelsky et al. | Applicant |
| US6178505(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Schneider et al. | Applicant |
| US6182118(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Finney et al. | Applicant |
| US6219667(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Lu et al. | Applicant |
| US6219786(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Cunningham et al. | Examiner |
| US6233618(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Shannon | Applicant |
| US6233686(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Zenchelsky et al. | Applicant |
| US6253188(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Witek et al. | Examiner |
| US6266664(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Russell-Falla et al. | Applicant |
| US6295559(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Emens et al. | Applicant |
| US6301658(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Koehler | Examiner |
| US6338088(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Waters et al. | Applicant |
| US6357010(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Viets et al. | Applicant |
| US6377577(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Bechtolsheim et al. | Applicant |
| US6418433(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Chakrabarti et al. | Applicant |
| US6446119(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Olah et al. | Applicant |
| US6456306(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Chin et al. | Applicant |
| US6460141(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Olden | Applicant |
| US6466940(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Mills | Applicant |
| US6486892(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Stern | Applicant |
| US6519571(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Guheen et al. | Applicant |
| US6571249(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Garrecht et al. | Applicant |
| US6606659(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Hegli et al. | Applicant |
| US6741997(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Liu et al. | Applicant |
| US6742003(B2) | 2004-05-01 | Heckerman et al. | Applicant |
| US6785732(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Bates et al. | Applicant |
| US6804780(B1) | 2004-10-01 | Touboul | Applicant |
| US6807558(B1) | 2004-10-01 | Hassett et al. | Applicant |
| US6832230(B1) | 2004-12-01 | Zilliacus et al. | Applicant |
| US6832256(B1) | 2004-12-01 | Toga | Applicant |
| US6839680(B1) | 2005-01-01 | Liu et al. | Applicant |
| US6894991(B2) | 2005-05-01 | Ayyagari et al. | Applicant |
| US6947935(B1) | 2005-09-01 | Horvitz et al. | Applicant |
| US6978292(B1) | 2005-12-01 | Murakami et al. | Applicant |
| US7051200(B1) | 2006-05-01 | Manferdelli et al. | Applicant |
| US7058822(B2) | 2006-06-01 | Edery et al. | Applicant |
| US7089246(B1) | 2006-08-01 | O'laughlen | Applicant |
| US7093293(B1) | 2006-08-01 | Smithson et al. | Applicant |
| US7096493(B1) | 2006-08-01 | Liu | Applicant |
| US7185015(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Kester et al. | Examiner |
| US7185361(B1) | 2007-02-01 | Ashoff et al. | Applicant |
| US7197713(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Stern | Applicant |
| US7209893(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Nii | Applicant |
| US7213069(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Anderson et al. | Examiner |
| US7313823(B2) | 2007-12-01 | Gao | Applicant |
| US7359372(B2) | 2008-04-01 | Pelletier et al. | Examiner |
| US7376154(B2) | 2008-05-01 | Ilnicki et al. | Applicant |
| US7603685(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Knudson et al. | Applicant |
| US7603687(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Pietraszak et al. | Applicant |
| USRE41168(E) | 2010-03-01 | Shannon | Applicant |
| US7690013(B1) | 2010-03-01 | Eldering et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0032258(A1) | 2001-10-01 | Ishida et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0039582(A1) | 2001-11-01 | McKinnon et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0047343(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Dahan et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0042821(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Muret et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0049883(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Schneider et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0062359(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Klopp et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0073089(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Schwartz et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0103848(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Giacomini et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0110084(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Butt et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0120754(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Anderson et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0129039(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Majewski et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0129140(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Peled et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0129277(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Caccavale | Applicant |
| US2002/0133509(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Johnston et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0144129(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Malivanchuk et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0152284(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Cambray et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0178374(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Swimmer et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0005112(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Krautkremer | Applicant |
| US2003/0009495(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Adjaoute | Applicant |
| US2003/0023860(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Eatough et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0074567(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Charbonneau | Applicant |
| US2003/0093694(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Medvinsky et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0097617(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Goeller et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0105863(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Hegli et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0110168(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Kester et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0120543(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Carey | Applicant |
| US2003/0126136(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Omoigui | Applicant |
| US2003/0126139(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0135611(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Kemp et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0149930(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Rey et al. | Examiner |
| US2003/0167257(A1) | 2003-09-01 | De Bonet | Applicant |
| US2003/0177187(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Levine et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0177394(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Dozortsev | Applicant |
| US2003/0182420(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Jones et al. | Examiner |
| US2003/0185395(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0185399(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Ishiguro | Applicant |
| US2004/0003139(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Cottrille et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0006621(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Bellinson et al. | Examiner |
| US2004/0015586(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Hegli | Applicant |
| US2004/0019656(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Smith | Applicant |
| US2004/0034794(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Mayer et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0049514(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Burkov | Applicant |
| US2004/0062106(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Ramesh et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0068479(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Wolfson et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0078591(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Teixeira et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0111499(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Dobrowski et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0123157(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Alagna et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0128285(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Green et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0153644(A1) | 2004-08-01 | McCorkendale | Applicant |
| US2004/0172389(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Galai et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0181788(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Kester et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0220924(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Wootton | Applicant |
| US2005/0015626(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Chasin | Applicant |
| US2005/0033967(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Morino et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0066197(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Hirata et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0091535(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Kavalam et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0131868(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Lin et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0132042(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Cryer | Applicant |
| US2005/0132184(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Palliyil et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0138353(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Spies | Applicant |
| US2005/0155012(A1) | 2005-07-01 | Tayama et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0210035(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Kester et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0223001(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Kester et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0251862(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Talvitie | Applicant |
| US2006/0004636(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Kester et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0004717(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Ramarathnam et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0026105(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Endoh | Applicant |
| US2006/0031504(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Hegli et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0053488(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Sinclair et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0068755(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Shraim et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0075072(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Sinclair et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0095404(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Adelman et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0095459(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Adelman et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0095586(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Adelman et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0095965(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Phillips et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0101514(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Milener et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0129644(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Owen et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0265750(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Huddleston | Applicant |
| US2007/0005762(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Knox et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0011739(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Zamir et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0028302(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Brennan et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0156833(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Nikolov et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0267144(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Jano et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0295177(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Dettinger et al. | Applicant |
| EP658837(A2) | 1994-12-01 | Applicant | |
| EP748095 | 1996-12-01 | Applicant | |
| EP986229 | 2000-03-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1074916 | 2001-02-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1180889 | 2002-02-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1180889(A2) | 2002-02-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1278136 | 2003-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1278330 | 2003-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1280040 | 2003-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1318468 | 2003-06-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1329117 | 2003-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1318468 | 2003-11-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1457885 | 2004-09-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1494409 | 2005-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1510945 | 2005-03-01 | Applicant | |
| GB2418330 | 2006-03-01 | Applicant | |
| GB2418999 | 2006-04-01 | Applicant | |
| JP10243018 | 1998-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2000-235540 | 2000-08-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2002-358253 | 2002-12-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2003-050758 | 2003-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2004-013258 | 2004-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO92/19054 | 1992-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO96/05549(A1) | 1996-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO96/42041 | 1996-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/24012 | 2001-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/31512 | 2001-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/33371 | 2001-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/55873 | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/55905(A1) | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/63835 | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2005/017708 | 2005-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2006/027590 | 2006-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2006/136605 | 2006-12-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (36)
- Greenfield, P. et al. “Access Prevention techniques for Internet Content Filtering” CSIRO, Dec. 1999, XP002265027.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 8, 2005 for International App. No. PCT/GB2005/Y6424 filed on Sep. 9, 2005.Applicant
- Goldman, R. et al. “DataGuides: Enabling Query Formulation and Optimization in Semistructured Databases” Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Aug. 26, 1997 pp. 436-445.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated dated Dec. 9, 2005 for International Application No. PCT/GB2005/003482 filed on Sep. 9, 2005.Applicant
- Surfcontrol “Project Nomad” Oct. 29, 2003; See: http://www.surfcontrol.com/news/newsitem.aspx?id=593.Applicant
- United Kingdom Search Report dated Oct. 7, 2004 for application GB0417620.2 and Combined Search and Examination Report dated Oct. 8, 2004.Applicant
- United Kingdom Search Report dated Nov. 4, 2004 for corresponding UK application GB0420024.2.Applicant
- United Kingdom Search Report dated Jan. 6, 2005 for corresponding UK application GB0420025.9.Applicant
- United Kingdom Search Report dated Jan. 31, 2005 for corresponding UK application GB0420023.4.Applicant
- PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 19, 2005 for corresponding Int'l. application PCT/GB2005/002961.Applicant
- C. L. Schuba and E. H. Spafford, Countering abuse of name-based authentication, Pub: In 22nd Annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, 1996, pp. 21.Applicant
- Cohen, F., A Cryptographic Checksum for Integrity Protection, Computers & Security, Elsevier Science Publishers, Dec. 1, 1987, vol. 6, Issue 6, pp. 505-510, Amsterdam, NL.Applicant
- European Search Report for Application No. 02258462.7, Jan. 30, 2006.Applicant
- Forte, M. et al., “A content classification and filtering server for the Internet”, Applied Computing 2006. 21st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, [online] http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1141553&coll=portal&dI=ACM&CFID=2181828&CFTOKEN=68827537> [retrieved on Dec. 7, 2007], Apr. 23, 2006-Apr. 27, 2006, pp. 1166-1171.Applicant
- Gittler F., et al., The DCE Security Service, Pub: Hewlett-Packard Journal, Dec. 1995, pp. 41-48.Applicant
- IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Mean to Protect System from Virus, IBM Corp., Aug. 1, 1994, Issue 659-660.Applicant
- Igakura, Tomohiro et al., Specific quality measurement and control of the service-oriented networking application., Technical Report of IEICE, IEICE Association, Jan. 18, 2002, vol. 101, Issue 563, pp. 51-56, Japan.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 30, 2008 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/024557.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/015730 dated Dec. 27, 2008, 16 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2006/049149, Mailed Mar. 10, 2008, 4 pages.Applicant
- Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, 3rd edition, Pub: Microsoft Press, 1997, pp. 262, 276.Applicant
- Molitor, Andrew, An Architecture for Advanced Packet Filtering, Proceedings for the Fifth Usenix Unix Security Symposium, Jun. 1995, pp. 1-11.Applicant
- Newman, H., A Look at Some Popular Filtering Systems, Pub: Internet, Online!, Jul. 25, 1999, pp. 1-11.Applicant
- PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/052483., Feb. 11, 2009.Applicant
- Roberts-Witt, S., The 1999 Utility Guide: Corporate Filtering, Pub: PC Magazine Online, Apr. 5, 1999, pp. 1-11.Applicant
- Sandhu, et al., Access Control: Principles and Practice, IEEE Communications Magazine, Sep. 1994, pp. 40-48.Applicant
- Secure Computing Corporation, SmartFilter™ Web Tool, Dec. 1, 1998, pp. 1-2.Applicant
- Sequel Technology, Inc., Sequel and Surfwatch Partner to Provide Innovative Internet Resource Management Tools for Large Enterprises, Pub: Internet, Online!, Feb. 25, 1999, pp. 1-3.Applicant
- Snyder, J., A Flurry of Firewalls, www.opus1.com/www/jms/nw-firewall.html, Network World, Jan. 29, 1996, pp. 1-8.Applicant
- Supplementary European Search Report for EPO App. No. 00 90 7078, May 18, 2004.Applicant
- SurfControl PLC, SuperScout Web Filter Reviewer's Guide, 2002, pp. 36.Applicant
- SurfWatch Software, SurfWatch® Professional Edition: Product Overview, Pub: Internet, Online!, May 26, 1999, pp. 1.Applicant
- Symantec Corporation, E-security begins with sound security policies, Announcement Symantec, XP002265695, Jun. 14, 2001, pp. 1,9.Applicant
- Williams, R., Data Integrity with Veracity, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: ftp://ftp.rocksoft.com/clients/rocksoft/papers/vercty10.ps>, Sep. 12, 1994.Applicant
- Wobus, J., DHCP FAQ, www.nd.edu/˜milind/FAQs/FAQ—dhcp, Dec. 29, 1995, pp. 1-10.Applicant
- Yialelis, et al., Role-Based Security for Distributed Object Systems, Proceedings of the IEEE Fifty Workshops on Enabling Technology: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, WET ICE '96, Jun. 19, 1996-Jun. 21, 1996, pp. 6.Applicant