US 8,002,365 B2Grant
Conformable track assembly for a robotic crawler
Issue Date:2011-08-23
•19 Claims
•4 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A suspension system for a lightweight robotic crawler is disclosed. The suspension system provides for mounting of a flexible endless track thereon. The suspension system includes a forward guide and a rearward guide around which the endless track can be looped. A deflector positioned between the forward guide and the rearward guide downwardly deflects a ground-engaging portion of the endless track to form a peaked area. The peaked area can support the lightweight robotic vehicle allowing alteration of a distribution of load over the ground-engaging portion of the endless track with respect to a supporting surface.
Metadata
Assignee
- Raytheon Company
Inventors
- Stephen C. Jacobsen
- Brian J. Maclean
- Ralph W. Pensel
- Christopher R. Hirschi
Application Information
Application Number:US 11/985,324
Filing Date:2007-11-13
Priority Date:2006-11-13
Art Unit:3617
Classifications
IPC:
B62D55/14B62D55/065
Patent Drawings (4 sheets)
Description
Related Applications
[0001] This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/858,805, filed Nov. 13, 2006 in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and entitled, “Conformable Track Assembly For A Robotic Crawler,” which application is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates to small, unmanned ground robotic vehicles. More particularly, the present invention relates to a suspension system for mounting a flexible endless track to support a lightweight robotic vehicle.
Background of the Invention and Related Art
[0003] Unmanned robotic vehicles can be deployed in a variety of applications and environments, including for example, search and rescue, military operations, and industrial operations. Unmanned robotic vehicles can help to avoid the need to expose humans to hazardous environments, such as unstable buildings, military conflict situations, and chemically, biologically, or nuclear contaminated environments.
[0004] Unmanned robotic vehicles face many challenges when attempting mobility. Terrain can vary widely, including for example, bumpy or smooth surfaces, firm or soft ground, loose and shifting materials, etc. For small robotic vehicles, the challenges become even greater. A vehicle optimized for operation in one environment may perform poorly in other environments.
[0005] The use of endless tracks are known to provide a good compromise which allows a robotic vehicle to accommodate a large variation in terrain types while maintaining relatively good traction and maneuverability. For example, tank-like vehicles using a pair of parallel endless tracks can provide high stability in some environments.
[0006] Tracked vehicles are typically steered using skid steering. In skid steering, the tracks on opposite sides of the vehicle are moved at different rates. Skid steering can be inefficient, as portions of the tracks move perpendicular to the direction of travel. There can be significant friction opposing this sideways motion. For longer tracks, greater force must be applied to overcome this friction. The inefficiency of skid steering also increases for tighter radius turns. The inefficiency of skid steering is at a peak when there is no net forward movement of the vehicle, only rotation around a central pivot point. A sharp turning radius can also result in significant stress on the vehicle suspension components due to the lateral movement. For lightweight robotic vehicles which tend to have limited drive power available, sharp turns may therefore be difficult or impossible to obtain.
Summary of the Invention
[0007] The present invention includes a suspension system for a flexible endless track that helps to overcome problems and deficiencies inherent in the prior art. In one embodiment, the suspension system includes a frame, on which a forward guide, rearward guide, and at least one deflector are mounted. An endless track can be looped around the forward guide and rearward guide. The deflector downwardly deflects a ground-engaging portion of the endless track between the forward guide and the rearward guide to form a peaked area. The deflector is configured as a full load-bearing component capable of altering a distribution of load over the ground-engaging portion of the endless track with respect to a supporting surface.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0008] The present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Understanding that these drawings merely depict exemplary embodiments of the present invention they are, therefore, not to be considered limiting of its scope. It will be readily appreciated that the components of the present invention, as generally described and illustrated in the figures herein, can be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Nonetheless, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
[0009] FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of a suspension system for mounting a flexible endless track according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
[0010] FIG. 2 illustrates a perspective view of a lightweight robotic vehicle having a suspension system in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;
[0011] FIG. 3 illustrates a side view of a suspension system for mounting a flexible endless track according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
[0012] FIG. 4 illustrates a side view of a suspension system for mounting a flexible endless track according to yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention; and
[0013] FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for supporting a lightweight robotic vehicle on an endless track according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description of Exemplary Embodiments
[0014] The following detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the invention makes reference to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof and in which are shown, by way of illustration, exemplary embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. While these exemplary embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art practice the invention, it should be understood that other embodiments may be realized and that various changes to the invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, the following more detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, as claimed, but is presented for purposes of illustration only and not limitation to describe the features and characteristics of the present invention, to set forth the best mode of operation of the invention, and to sufficiently enable one skilled in the art to practice the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is to be defined solely by the appended claims.
[0015] The following detailed description and exemplary embodiments of the invention will be best understood by reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein the elements and features of the invention are designated by numerals throughout.
[0016] With reference to FIG. 1 , shown is an illustration of a suspension system for mounting a flexible endless track thereon to support a lightweight robotic vehicle according to a first exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Specifically, FIG. 1 illustrates the suspension system 10 as including a frame 12 having a forward guide 14 and a rearward guide 16 coupled thereto. An endless track 18 can be looped around the forward guide and the rearward guide. A deflector 20 is coupled to the frame between the forward guide and the rearward guide. The deflector downwardly deflects the ground-engaging portion 22 of the endless track to form a peaked area 24. The deflector is a load-bearing component, capable of supporting the lightweight robotic vehicle. The deflector is thus capable of altering a distribution of loading over the ground-engaging portion of the endless track with respect to a supporting surface. In other words, the deflector can be extended or retracted to cause different distributions of the weight of the robotic vehicle over the ground-engaging portion of the endless track. For example, the deflector can be extended to cause the weight of the robot to be substantially concentrated on the portion of the ground-engaging portion under the deflector. As another example, the deflector can be retracted to cause the weight of the robot to be distributed substantially over the entire ground-engaging portion of the endless track. Of course, various other weight distributions in between these extremes are also possible. The actual distribution of weight over the ground-engaging portion of the endless track will be a function of the amount of deflection of the deflector and the properties of the surface on which the lightweight robotic vehicle is operated. The orientation of the lightweight robotic vehicle can thereby be altered with respect to a supporting surface by operation of the deflector.
[0017] Operation of a lightweight robotic vehicle using a suspension system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention will now be described. FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary tandem configuration of a lightweight robotic vehicle 26 using two tracked units 28a, 28b, each having a suspension system 10 as described above. The tracked units are linked together by an articulated arm 30. For example, commonly-owned U.S. Non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 11/985,323, entitled, “Serpentine Robotic Crawler,” filed Nov. 13, 2007 and incorporated in its entirety by reference herein, describes a serpentine robotic crawler in which the suspension system of the present invention can be used.
[0018] The lightweight robotic vehicle 26 is operated on a supporting surface 32. When operated over a firm area 33 of the supporting surface, the peaked area 24a of the endless track helps to support substantially all of the weight of tracked unit 28a. In contrast, when operated over a soft area 34 of the supporting surface, the peaked area 24b of the endless track will sink into the supporting surface, and the weight of tracked unit 28b is distributed over the ground-engaging portion 22b of the endless track. It will be appreciated that the operation of the endless tracks 18a, 18b and articulated arm 30 can be coordinated to maintain the lightweight robotic vehicle balanced on the peaked areas of the endless tracks.
[0019] When a lightweight robotic vehicle using the suspension system 10 is operated on a firm surface, the deflector lifts the lightweight robotic vehicle up so that most of the endless track is off the supporting surface. Hence, only the small area of the endless track near the peaked area 24 is in contact with the supporting surface. This helps to reduce friction when skid steering is performed, allowing for a tighter turning radius as compared to a conventional endless track, which provides a flat ground-engaging surface. Turning performing is accordingly more comparable to that of a wheeled vehicle than a tracked vehicle.
[0020] When the lightweight robotic vehicle is operated on a soft surface, a larger ground-engaging area of the endless track is in contact with the supporting surface. This provides better traction than a wheeled vehicle. Turning radius is not greatly reduced, however, as the soft surface provides relatively little friction to lateral movement of the track. Hence, the suspension system provides an improvement in turning radius over a conventional endless track on firm surfaces, while retaining the traction advantages of the endless track on soft surfaces.
[0021] Various alternate arrangements of the components of the suspension 10 are possible. Referring back to FIG. 1 , the forward guide 14, rearward guide 16, and deflector 20 can be rollers rotatably mounted to the frame 12. The forward guide, rearward guide, and deflector can be mounted in fixed positions on the frame relative to each other, although this is not essential. Alternately, the forward guide, the rearward guide, or the deflector can be movable, for example to help maintain constant tension in the track.
[0022] The deflector 20 can also include a load-sensing element (not shown). For example, the load-sensing element can be a load cell, strain gauge, pressure sensor, or the like as is known in the art. During operation of the lightweight robotic vehicle, the deflector may support a varying portion of the lightweight robotic vehicle's weight, and thus a load-sensing element on the deflector can provide useful information for control of the lightweight robotic vehicle. For example, a lightweight robotic vehicle may be in a tank-like configuration where parallel endless tracks are disposed on each side of the vehicle. Each endless track can include a deflector and associated load-sensing element. When the vehicle is at risk of tipping sideways, the load sensed on one deflector will greatly exceed the other deflector. Corrective action can then be taken.
[0023] In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, as illustrated in FIG. 3 , a suspension system 40 can include a moveable deflector assembly 42. For example, the deflector 20 can be mounted to a piston arm 44 that is driven up and down by hydraulic cylinder 46. This can allow the amount of downward deflection of the endless track to be adjusted during operation of the lightweight robotic vehicle. For example, when operating on hard surface, the deflector may be displaced downward to provide a strongly curved peaked area to enable tight turning. When operating on a soft surface, the deflector may be displaced upward to provide a flatter ground-engaging area to maximize traction. Optionally, track tensioning components (not shown) can be included to maintain proper tension of the endless track as the deflector is moved up or down. The hydraulic cylinder is capable of generating enough force to enable supporting the full weight of the lightweight robotic vehicle. For example, for a lightweight robotic vehicle which weighs 20 pounds (or less), downward deflector force of 20 pounds (or more) is sufficient to allow the full weight of the lightweight robotic vehicle to be carried by the peaked area of the track. Since the deflector is capable of supporting the full weight of the lightweight robotic vehicle, it will be appreciated that heavier vehicles require a more robust deflector design. Accordingly, it is expected that lightweight robotic vehicles are more adaptable to embodiments of the present invention than large, heavy vehicles. More particularly, while many different deflector configurations will be suitable for supporting a lightweight robotic vehicle, a single deflector capable of supporting a large tank, for example, appears somewhat impractical.
[0024] In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, as illustrated in FIG. 4 , a suspension system 50 can include multiple deflectors 52a, 52b, 52c coupled to the frame 12. The multiple deflectors downwardly deflect the ground-engaging portion of the endless track to form the peaked area into a curved shape. Multiple deflectors can provide various different profiles, allowing the detailed shape of the peaked area to be optimized for particular environments. For example, multiple moveable deflectors can be used to dynamically vary the shape of the peaked area during operation, as well as adjust the vertical orientation, or pitch, of the lightweight robotic vehicle. Multiple deflectors can also provide some benefit in allowing the load of the lightweight robotic vehicle to be distributed over multiple components. As discussed above, the deflectors can include load-sensing elements. Operation of the deflectors may be modified based on measurements obtained from the load-sensing elements.
[0025] In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, as illustrated in FIG. 5 , a method for supporting a lightweight robotic vehicle on an endless track is shown in flow diagram form. The method, shown generally at 60, includes providing 62 an endless track looped around a forward guide and a rearward guide of the lightweight robotic vehicle. For example, various examples of suspension systems having a forward guide and a rearward guide are discussed above. The method also includes deflecting 64 a ground-engaging portion of the endless track between the forward guide and the rearward guide in a downward direction to form a peaked area of the endless track. Various examples of deflectors are discussed above. Finally, the method includes supporting 66 the lightweight robotic vehicle at least partially by the peaked area so as to enable changing distribution of load over the ground-engaging portion of the endless track with respect to a supporting surface. For example, the lightweight robotic vehicle can be balanced on the peaked area as discussed above. As another example, the lightweight robotic vehicle can be pivoted on the peaked area to provide a short or zero radius turn.
[0026] Optionally, as discussed above, the method can include operating the lightweight robotic vehicle on a firm surface such that the peaked area of the endless track supports substantially all of the weight of the lightweight robotic vehicle. This can help to provide short radius turns. In addition, as discussed above, the method can include operating the lightweight robotic vehicle on a soft surface such that the weight of the lightweight robotic vehicle is distributed over the ground-engaging portion of the endless track. This can help to provide high traction.
[0027] The method can also include coupling the lightweight robotic vehicle to a second lightweight robotic vehicle, for example as described above. Operation of the coupled lightweight robotic vehicles can be coordinated to maintain one (or both) of the lightweight robotic vehicles balanced on the peaked area.
[0028] Finally, the method can also include moving the deflector up or down. For example, moving the deflector down can create a more strongly peaked area of the endless track to provide for shorter turning radius. Moving the deflector up can create a more flat ground-engaging portion of the endless track to provide for better traction.
[0029] Summarizing and reiterating to some extent, various endless track suspension system configurations have been described which provide various benefits over the prior art. For example, deflecting a portion of the ground-engaging surface of the endless track to form a peaked area can provide a tight turning radius for a lightweight robotic vehicle operated over a firm surface. Multiple and/or moveable deflectors can be included to allow varying the shape of the peaked area. A lightweight robotic vehicle using an embodiment of the present invention can provide improved turning radius without sacrificing the traction benefit provided by the large ground-engaging portion of an endless track.
[0030] The foregoing detailed description describes the invention with reference to specific exemplary embodiments. However, it will be appreciated that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the appended claims. The detailed description and accompanying drawings are to be regarded as merely illustrative, rather than as restrictive, and all such modifications or changes, if any, are intended to fall within the scope of the present invention as described and set forth herein.
[0031] More specifically, while illustrative exemplary embodiments of the invention have been described herein, the present invention is not limited to these embodiments, but includes any and all embodiments having modifications, omissions, combinations (e.g., of aspects across various embodiments), adaptations and/or alterations as would be appreciated by those in the art based on the foregoing detailed description. The limitations in the claims are to be interpreted broadly based the language employed in the claims and not limited to examples described in the foregoing detailed description or during the prosecution of the application, which examples are to be construed as non-exclusive. For example, in the present disclosure, the term “preferably” is non-exclusive where it is intended to mean “preferably, but not limited to.” Any steps recited in any method or process claims may be executed in any order and are not limited to the order presented in the claims. Means-plus-function or step-plus-function limitations will only be employed where for a specific claim limitation all of the following conditions are present: a) “means for” or “step for” is expressly recited in that limitation; b) a corresponding function is expressly recited in that limitation; and c) structure, material or acts that support that function are described within the specification. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined solely by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the descriptions and examples given above.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A suspension system for a lightweight robotic vehicle having tandem tracks, the suspension system comprising:
a frame;
a forward guide coupled to the frame and configured to receive a looped portion of a first endless track around the forward guide;
a rearward guide coupled to the frame and configured to receive a looped portion of the first endless track around the rearward guide; and
at least one deflector operable with the frame between the forward guide and the rearward guide, the at least one deflector being configured to downwardly deflect a ground-engaging portion of the first endless track between the forward guide and the rearward guide to form a peaked area,
whereby the lightweight robotic vehicle is selectively stabilized on the peaked area of the first endless track and a peaked area of a second endless track associated in tandem with the first endless track by an articulated arm.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one deflector is in a fixed position relative to at least one of the forward guide and the rearward guide.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the forward guide and the rearward guide are coupled to the frame in a fixed relative position.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the forward guide and the rearward guide are each rollers.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one deflector is a roller.
6. The system of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of deflectors coupled to the frame in positions between the forward guide and the rearward guide and configured to downwardly deflect the ground-engaging portion of the first endless track to form the peaked area into a curved shape.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the deflector is configured to support the lightweight robotic vehicle when the weight of the lightweight robotic vehicle is less than 20 pounds.
8. The system of claim 1, further comprising a second frame in support of the second endless track, the second frame comprising a forward guide and a rearward guide coupled to the second frame and configured to receive respective looped portions of the second endless track.
9. The system of claim 8, wherein the second frame comprises at least one deflector between the forward guide and the rearward guide, the at least one deflector being configured to downwardly deflect a ground-engaging portion of the second endless track between the forward guide and the rearward guide to form a peaked area on the second endless track.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the deflectors of the frame and the second frame are selectively engageable to simultaneously support both vehicle frames at partially on their respective peak areas.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the articulated arm is actuated, and provides actuated rotational movement about a longitudinal axis and bending movement about two different lateral axes.
12. A method for supporting a lightweight robotic vehicle on tandem endless tracks, comprising:
providing a first endless track looped around a forward guide and a rearward guide of the lightweight robotic vehicle;
selectively deflecting at least one ground-engaging portion of the first endless track in between the forward guide and the rearward guide in a downward direction to form a peaked area of the first endless track; and
stabilizing the lightweight robotic vehicle at least partially on the peaked area of the first endless track and a peaked area of a second endless track associated in tandem with the first endless track by an articulated arm, so as to enable changing distribution of load over the ground-engaging portion of the first endless track with respect to a supporting surface.
13. The method of claim 12, further comprising operating the lightweight robotic vehicle on a firm surface such that the peaked areas of the first and second endless tracks support substantially all the weight of the lightweight robotic vehicle.
14. The method of claim 12, further comprising operating the lightweight robotic vehicle on a soft surface such that the weight of the lightweight robotic vehicle is distributed substantially over the ground-engaging portions of the first and second endless tracks.
15. The method of claim 12, further comprising:
coupling the lightweight robotic vehicle to a second lightweight robotic vehicle; and
coordinating operation of the lightweight robotic vehicle with the second lightweight robotic vehicle to maintain the lightweight robotic vehicle balanced on the peaked areas.
16. The method of claim 12, further comprising selectively deflecting the ground-engaging portion along a vertical axis to vary a degree of curvature of the peaked area of the first endless track.
17. The method of claim 12, further comprising moving the deflector in an upward direction to create a flat ground-engaging portion of the first endless track.
18. The method of claim 12, further comprising:
selectively deflecting the ground-engaging portion of the first endless track and a ground engage portion of the second endless track in a downward direction to form peaked areas of both the first and second endless tracks; and
coordinating operation of the endless tracks to maintain the vehicle balanced on the peaked areas.
19. The method of claim 12, wherein the articulated arm is actuated, and provides actuated rotational movement about a longitudinal axis and bending movement about two different lateral axes.
Patent Citations (325)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US1107874(A) | 1914-08-01 | Appleby | Examiner |
| US1112460(A) | 1914-10-01 | Ieavitt | Examiner |
| US1515756(A) | 1924-11-01 | Roy | Applicant |
| US1975726(A) | 1934-10-01 | Martinage | Applicant |
| US2025999(A) | 1935-12-01 | Myers | Applicant |
| US2082920(A) | 1937-06-01 | Tye | Examiner |
| US2129557(A) | 1938-09-01 | Beach | Applicant |
| US2311475(A) | 1943-02-01 | Schmeiser | Applicant |
| US2312072(A) | 1943-02-01 | Broadwater | Applicant |
| US2329582(A) | 1943-09-01 | Bishop | Applicant |
| US2345763(A) | 1944-04-01 | Mayne | Applicant |
| US2701169(A) | 1955-02-01 | Cannon | Applicant |
| US2850147(A) | 1958-09-01 | Hill | Applicant |
| US2933143(A) | 1960-04-01 | Robinson et al. | Applicant |
| US2967737(A) | 1961-01-01 | Moore | Applicant |
| US3037571(A) | 1962-06-01 | Zelle | Applicant |
| US3060972(A) | 1962-10-01 | Aheldon | Applicant |
| US3166138(A) | 1965-01-01 | Dunn, Jr. | Applicant |
| US3190286(A) | 1965-06-01 | Stokes | Applicant |
| US3215219(A) | 1965-11-01 | Forsyth et al. | Applicant |
| US3223462(A) | 1965-12-01 | Dalrymple | Applicant |
| US3266059(A) | 1966-08-01 | Stelle | Applicant |
| US3284964(A) | 1966-11-01 | Saito | Applicant |
| US3311424(A) | 1967-03-01 | Taylor | Applicant |
| US3362492(A) | 1968-01-01 | Hansen | Examiner |
| US3387896(A) | 1968-06-01 | Sobota | Applicant |
| US3489236(A) | 1970-01-01 | Goodwin | Applicant |
| US3497083(A) | 1970-02-01 | Abdersib | Applicant |
| US3565198(A) | 1971-02-01 | Ames | Applicant |
| US3572325(A) | 1971-03-01 | Bazell et al. | Applicant |
| US3609804(A) | 1971-10-01 | Morrison | Applicant |
| US3650343(A) | 1972-03-01 | Helsell | Applicant |
| US3700115(A) | 1972-10-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US3707218(A) | 1972-12-01 | Payne et al. | Applicant |
| US3712481(A) | 1973-01-01 | Harwood | Applicant |
| US3715146(A) | 1973-02-01 | Robertson | Applicant |
| US3757635(A) | 1973-09-01 | Hickerson et al. | Applicant |
| US3808078(A) | 1974-04-01 | Snellman et al. | Applicant |
| US3820616(A) | 1974-06-01 | Juergens | Applicant |
| US3841424(A) | 1974-10-01 | Purcell et al. | Applicant |
| US3864983(A) | 1975-02-01 | Jacobsen | Applicant |
| US3933214(A) | 1976-01-01 | Guibord et al. | Applicant |
| US3934664(A) | 1976-01-01 | Pohjola | Applicant |
| US3974907(A) | 1976-08-01 | Shaw et al. | Applicant |
| US4051914(A) | 1977-10-01 | Pohjola | Applicant |
| US4059315(A) | 1977-11-01 | Jolliffe et al. | Applicant |
| US4068905(A) | 1978-01-01 | Black et al. | Applicant |
| US4107948(A) | 1978-08-01 | Molaug | Applicant |
| US4109971(A) | 1978-08-01 | Black et al. | Applicant |
| US4132279(A) | 1979-01-01 | Van der Lende et al. | Applicant |
| US4218101(A) | 1980-08-01 | Thompson | Applicant |
| US4260053(A) | 1981-04-01 | Onodera | Applicant |
| US4332317(A) | 1982-06-01 | Bahre et al. | Applicant |
| US4332424(A) | 1982-06-01 | Thompson | Applicant |
| US4339031(A) | 1982-07-01 | Densmore | Applicant |
| US4393728(A) | 1983-07-01 | Larson et al. | Applicant |
| US4396233(A) | 1983-08-01 | Slaght | Applicant |
| US4453611(A) | 1984-06-01 | Stacy, Jr. | Applicant |
| US4483407(A) | 1984-11-01 | Iwamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US4489826(A) | 1984-12-01 | Dubson | Applicant |
| US4494417(A) | 1985-01-01 | Larson et al. | Applicant |
| US4551061(A) | 1985-11-01 | Olenick | Applicant |
| US4589460(A) | 1986-05-01 | Albee | Examiner |
| US4621965(A) | 1986-11-01 | Wilcock | Applicant |
| US4636137(A) | 1987-01-01 | Lemelson | Applicant |
| US4646906(A) | 1987-03-01 | Wilcox, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US4661039(A) | 1987-04-01 | Brenholt | Applicant |
| US4700693(A) | 1987-10-01 | Lia et al. | Applicant |
| US4706506(A) | 1987-11-01 | Lestelle | Applicant |
| US4712969(A) | 1987-12-01 | Kimura | Applicant |
| US4714125(A) | 1987-12-01 | Stacy, Jr. | Applicant |
| US4727949(A) | 1988-03-01 | Rea et al. | Applicant |
| US4736826(A) | 1988-04-01 | White et al. | Applicant |
| US4752105(A) | 1988-06-01 | Barnard | Applicant |
| US4756662(A) | 1988-07-01 | Tanie et al. | Applicant |
| US4765795(A) | 1988-08-01 | Rebman | Applicant |
| US4784042(A) | 1988-11-01 | Painter | Applicant |
| US4796607(A) | 1989-01-01 | Allred, III et al. | Applicant |
| US4806066(A) | 1989-02-01 | Rhodes et al. | Applicant |
| US4815319(A) | 1989-03-01 | Clement et al. | Applicant |
| US4815911(A) | 1989-03-01 | Bengtsson et al. | Applicant |
| US4818175(A) | 1989-04-01 | Kimura | Applicant |
| US4828339(A) | 1989-05-01 | Thomas et al. | Applicant |
| US4848179(A) | 1989-07-01 | Ubhayakar | Applicant |
| US4862808(A) | 1989-09-01 | Hedgcoxe et al. | Applicant |
| US4878451(A) | 1989-11-01 | Siren | Applicant |
| US4900218(A) | 1990-02-01 | Sutherland | Applicant |
| US4909341(A) | 1990-03-01 | Rippingale et al. | Examiner |
| US4924153(A) | 1990-05-01 | Toru et al. | Applicant |
| US4932491(A) | 1990-06-01 | Collins, Jr. | Applicant |
| US4932831(A) | 1990-06-01 | White et al. | Applicant |
| US4936639(A) | 1990-06-01 | Pohjola | Examiner |
| US4977790(A) | 1990-12-01 | Nishi et al. | Applicant |
| US5018591(A) | 1991-05-01 | Price | Applicant |
| US5021798(A) | 1991-06-01 | Ubhayakar | Applicant |
| US5022812(A) | 1991-06-01 | Coughlan et al. | Applicant |
| US5046914(A) | 1991-09-01 | Holland et al. | Applicant |
| US5080000(A) | 1992-01-01 | Bubic | Applicant |
| US5130631(A) | 1992-07-01 | Gordon et al. | Applicant |
| US5142932(A) | 1992-09-01 | Moya et al. | Applicant |
| US5174168(A) | 1992-12-01 | Takagi et al. | Applicant |
| US5174405(A) | 1992-12-01 | Carra et al. | Applicant |
| US5186526(A) | 1993-02-01 | Pennington | Applicant |
| US5199771(A) | 1993-04-01 | James et al. | Applicant |
| US5205612(A) | 1993-04-01 | Sugden et al. | Applicant |
| US5214858(A) | 1993-06-01 | Pepper et al. | Applicant |
| US5219264(A) | 1993-06-01 | McClure et al. | Applicant |
| US5252870(A) | 1993-10-01 | Jacobsen et al. | Applicant |
| US5297443(A) | 1994-03-01 | Wentz | Applicant |
| US5317952(A) | 1994-06-01 | Immega | Applicant |
| US5337732(A) | 1994-08-01 | Grundfest et al. | Applicant |
| US5350033(A) | 1994-09-01 | Kraft | Applicant |
| US5354124(A) | 1994-10-01 | James | Applicant |
| US5363935(A) | 1994-11-01 | Schempf et al. | Applicant |
| US5386741(A) | 1995-02-01 | Rennex | Applicant |
| US5413454(A) | 1995-05-01 | Movsesian | Applicant |
| US5426336(A) | 1995-06-01 | Jacobsen et al. | Applicant |
| US5428713(A) | 1995-06-01 | Matsumaru | Applicant |
| US5435405(A) | 1995-07-01 | Schempf et al. | Applicant |
| US5440916(A) | 1995-08-01 | Stone et al. | Applicant |
| US5443354(A) | 1995-08-01 | Stone et al. | Applicant |
| US5451135(A) | 1995-09-01 | Schempf et al. | Applicant |
| US5465525(A) | 1995-11-01 | Mifune | Applicant |
| US5466056(A) | 1995-11-01 | James et al. | Applicant |
| US5469756(A) | 1995-11-01 | Feiten | Applicant |
| US5516249(A) | 1996-05-01 | Brimhall | Applicant |
| US5551545(A) | 1996-09-01 | Gelfman | Applicant |
| US5556370(A) | 1996-09-01 | Maynard | Applicant |
| US5562843(A) | 1996-10-01 | Yasumoto | Applicant |
| US5567110(A) | 1996-10-01 | Sutherland | Applicant |
| US5570992(A) | 1996-11-01 | Lemelson | Applicant |
| US5573316(A) | 1996-11-01 | Wankowski | Applicant |
| US5588688(A) | 1996-12-01 | Jacobsen et al. | Applicant |
| US5672044(A) | 1997-09-01 | Lemelson | Applicant |
| US5697285(A) | 1997-12-01 | Nappi et al. | Applicant |
| US5712961(A) | 1998-01-01 | Matsuo | Applicant |
| US5749828(A) | 1998-05-01 | Solomon et al. | Applicant |
| US5770913(A) | 1998-06-01 | Mizzi | Applicant |
| US5816769(A) | 1998-10-01 | Bauer et al. | Applicant |
| US5821666(A) | 1998-10-01 | Matsumoto et al. | Applicant |
| US5842381(A) | 1998-12-01 | Feiten | Applicant |
| USRE36025(E) | 1999-01-01 | Suzuki | Applicant |
| US5878783(A) | 1999-03-01 | Smart | Applicant |
| US5888235(A) | 1999-03-01 | Jacobsen et al. | Applicant |
| US5902254(A) | 1999-05-01 | Magram | Applicant |
| US5906591(A) | 1999-05-01 | Dario et al. | Applicant |
| US5984032(A) | 1999-11-01 | Gremillion et al. | Applicant |
| US5996346(A) | 1999-12-01 | Maynard | Applicant |
| US6016385(A) | 2000-01-01 | Yee et al. | Applicant |
| US6030057(A) | 2000-02-01 | Fikse | Applicant |
| US6056237(A) | 2000-05-01 | Woodland | Applicant |
| US6107795(A) | 2000-08-01 | Smart | Applicant |
| US6109705(A) | 2000-08-01 | Courtemanche | Applicant |
| US6113343(A) | 2000-09-01 | Goldenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US6132133(A) | 2000-10-01 | Muro et al. | Examiner |
| US6138604(A) | 2000-10-01 | Anderson et al. | Applicant |
| US6162171(A) | 2000-12-01 | Ng et al. | Applicant |
| US6186604(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Fikse | Applicant |
| US6203126(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Harguth | Applicant |
| US6260501(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Agnew | Applicant |
| US6263989(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Won | Applicant |
| US6264293(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Musselman et al. | Applicant |
| US6264294(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Musselman et al. | Applicant |
| US6281489(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Tubel et al. | Applicant |
| US7843431(B2) | 2001-11-01 | Robbins et al. | Applicant |
| US6325749(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Inokuchi et al. | Applicant |
| US6333631(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Das et al. | Applicant |
| US6339993(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Comello et al. | Applicant |
| US6380889(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Herrmann | Applicant |
| US6394204(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Haringer | Applicant |
| US6405798(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Barrett et al. | Applicant |
| US6408224(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Okamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US6411055(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Fujita et al. | Applicant |
| US6422509(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Yim | Applicant |
| US6430475(B2) | 2002-08-01 | Okamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US6431296(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Won | Applicant |
| US6446718(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Barrett et al. | Applicant |
| US6450104(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Grant et al. | Applicant |
| US6484083(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Hayward et al. | Applicant |
| US6488306(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Shirey et al. | Applicant |
| US6505896(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Boivin et al. | Applicant |
| US6512345(B2) | 2003-01-01 | Borenstein et al. | Applicant |
| US6523629(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Buttz et al. | Applicant |
| US6529806(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Licht | Applicant |
| US6540310(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Cartwright | Applicant |
| US6557954(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Hattori | Applicant |
| US6563084(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Bandy et al. | Applicant |
| US6574958(B1) | 2003-06-01 | MacGregor | Applicant |
| US6576406(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Jacobsen et al. | Applicant |
| US6595812(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Haney | Applicant |
| US6610007(B2) | 2003-08-01 | Belson et al. | Applicant |
| US6619146(B2) | 2003-09-01 | Kerrebrock | Applicant |
| US6651804(B2) | 2003-11-01 | Thomas et al. | Applicant |
| US6668951(B2) | 2003-12-01 | Won | Applicant |
| US6708068(B1) | 2004-03-01 | Sakaue | Applicant |
| US6715575(B2) | 2004-04-01 | Karpik | Applicant |
| US6772673(B2) | 2004-08-01 | Seto et al. | Applicant |
| US6773327(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Felice et al. | Applicant |
| US6774597(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Borenstein | Applicant |
| US6799815(B2) | 2004-10-01 | Krishnan et al. | Applicant |
| US6820653(B1) | 2004-11-01 | Schempf et al. | Applicant |
| US6831436(B2) | 2004-12-01 | Gonzalez | Applicant |
| US6835173(B2) | 2004-12-01 | Couvillon, Jr. | Applicant |
| US6837318(B1) | 2005-01-01 | Craig et al. | Applicant |
| US6840588(B2) | 2005-01-01 | Deland et al. | Applicant |
| US6866671(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Tierney et al. | Applicant |
| US6870343(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Borenstein et al. | Applicant |
| US6917176(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Schempf et al. | Applicant |
| US6923693(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Borgen et al. | Applicant |
| US6936003(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Iddan | Applicant |
| US6959231(B2) | 2005-10-01 | Maeda | Applicant |
| US7020701(B1) | 2006-03-01 | Gelvin et al. | Applicant |
| US7040426(B1) | 2006-05-01 | Berg | Examiner |
| US7044245(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Anhalt et al. | Applicant |
| US7069124(B1) | 2006-06-01 | Whittaker et al. | Applicant |
| US7090637(B2) | 2006-08-01 | Danitz et al. | Applicant |
| US7137465(B1) | 2006-11-01 | Kerrebrock et al. | Applicant |
| US7144057(B1) | 2006-12-01 | Young et al. | Applicant |
| US7171279(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Buckingham et al. | Applicant |
| US7188473(B1) | 2007-03-01 | Asada | Applicant |
| US7188568(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Stout | Applicant |
| US7228203(B2) | 2007-06-01 | Koselka et al. | Applicant |
| US7235046(B2) | 2007-06-01 | Anhalt et al. | Applicant |
| US7331436(B1) | 2008-02-01 | Pack et al. | Applicant |
| US7387179(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Anhalt et al. | Applicant |
| US7415321(B2) | 2008-08-01 | Okazaki et al. | Applicant |
| US7546912(B1) | 2009-06-01 | Pack et al. | Applicant |
| US7600592(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Goldenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US7645110(B2) | 2010-01-01 | Ogawa et al. | Applicant |
| US7654348(B2) | 2010-02-01 | Ohm et al. | Applicant |
| US7775312(B2) | 2010-08-01 | Maggio | Applicant |
| US7860614(B1) | 2010-12-01 | Reger | Applicant |
| US2001/0037163(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Allard | Applicant |
| US2002/0128714(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Manasas et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0140392(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Borenstein | Applicant |
| US2003/0000747(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Sugiyama et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0069474(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Couvillon, Jr. | Applicant |
| US2003/0097080(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Esashi et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0110938(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Seto et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0223844(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Schiele et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0030571(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Solomon | Applicant |
| US2004/0099175(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Perrot et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0103740(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Townsend et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0168837(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Michaud et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0216931(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Won | Applicant |
| US2004/0216932(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Giovanetti et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0007055(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Borenstein | Applicant |
| US2005/0027412(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Hobson et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0085693(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Belson et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0107669(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Couvillon, Jr. | Applicant |
| US2005/0166413(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Crampton | Applicant |
| US2005/0168068(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Courtemanche et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0168070(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Dandurand | Applicant |
| US2005/0225162(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Gibbins | Applicant |
| US2005/0235898(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Hobson et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0235899(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Yamamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0288819(A1) | 2005-12-01 | de Guzman | Applicant |
| US2006/0000137(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Valdivia y Alvarado et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0005733(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Rastegar et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0010702(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Roth et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0070775(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Anhalt et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0156851(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Jacobsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0225928(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Nelson | Applicant |
| US2006/0229773(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Peretz | Applicant |
| US2007/0029117(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Goldenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0156286(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Yamauchi | Applicant |
| US2007/0193790(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Goldenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0260378(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Clodfelter | Applicant |
| US2008/0115687(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Gal | Applicant |
| US2008/0164079(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Jacobsen | Applicant |
| US2008/0168070(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Naphade et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0215185(A1) | 2008-09-01 | Jacobsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0272647(A9) | 2008-11-01 | Hirose et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0284244(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Hirose et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0035097(A1) | 2009-02-01 | Loane | Applicant |
| US2009/0171151(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Choset et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0030377(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Unsworth | Applicant |
| US2010/0201185(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Jacobsen | Applicant |
| US2010/0317244(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Jacobsen | Applicant |
| US2010/0318242(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Jacobsen | Applicant |
| CA2512299 | 2004-09-01 | Applicant | |
| CN1603068(A) | 2005-04-01 | Applicant | |
| CN2774717 | 2006-04-01 | Applicant | |
| CN1970373 | 2007-05-01 | Applicant | |
| DE3025840 | 1982-02-01 | Applicant | |
| DE3626238(A1) | 1988-02-01 | Applicant | |
| DE19617852 | 1997-10-01 | Applicant | |
| DE19714464 | 1997-10-01 | Applicant | |
| DE19704080 | 1998-08-01 | Applicant | |
| DE10018075 | 2001-01-01 | Applicant | |
| DE102004010089 | 2005-09-01 | Applicant | |
| EP105418 | 1984-04-01 | Applicant | |
| EP818283 | 1998-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP924034 | 1999-06-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1510896 | 2005-03-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1832501 | 2007-09-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1832502 | 2007-09-01 | Applicant | |
| FR2638813 | 1990-05-01 | Applicant | |
| FR2850350 | 2004-07-01 | Applicant | |
| GB1199729 | 1970-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP52-57625 | 1977-05-01 | Examiner | |
| JP58-89480 | 1983-05-01 | Examiner | |
| JP60015275(A) | 1985-01-01 | Examiner | |
| JP60047771(A) | 1985-03-01 | Examiner | |
| JP60060516 | 1985-04-01 | Applicant | |
| JP60139576(A) | 1985-07-01 | Examiner | |
| JP61-1581 | 1986-01-01 | Examiner | |
| JP61089182 | 1986-05-01 | Applicant | |
| JP63306988(A) | 1988-12-01 | Examiner | |
| JP4092784(A) | 1992-03-01 | Examiner | |
| JP5147560(A) | 1993-06-01 | Examiner | |
| JP6-115465 | 1994-04-01 | Examiner | |
| JP3535508 | 2004-06-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2005111595 | 2005-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO97/26039 | 1997-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/10073 | 2000-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2/16995 | 2002-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO3/030727 | 2003-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO3/037515 | 2003-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2005/018428 | 2005-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2006068080 | 2006-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2008/049050 | 2008-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2008/076194 | 2008-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2008/135978 | 2008-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2009/009673 | 2009-01-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (38)
- Arnold, Henry, “Cricket the robot documentation.” online manual available at http://www.parallaxinc.com, 22 pages.Applicant
- Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,336, filed Nov. 13, 2007.Applicant
- Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,346, filed Nov. 13, 2007.Applicant
- Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,323, filed Nov. 13, 2007.Applicant
- Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,320, filed Nov. 13, 2007.Applicant
- Iagnemma, Karl et al., “Traction control of wheeled robotic vehicles in rough terrain with application to planetary rovers.” International Journal of Robotics Research, Oct.-Nov. 2004, pp. 1029-1040, vol. 23, No. 10-11.Applicant
- Hirose, et al., “Snakes and strings; new robotic components for rescue operations,” International Journal of Robotics Research, Apr.-May 2004, pp. 341-349, vol. 23, No. 4-5.Applicant
- Paap et al., “A robot snake to inspect broken buildings,” IEEE, 2000, pp. 2079-2082, Japan.Applicant
- Braure, Jerome, “Participation to the construction of a salamander robot: exploration of the morphological configuration and the locomotion controller”, Biologically Inspired Robotics Group, master thesis, Feb. 17, 2004, pp. 1-46.Applicant
- Jacobsen, et al., Advanced intelligent mechanical sensors (AIMS), Proc. IEEE Trandsucers, Jun. 24-27, 1991, abstract only, San Fransico, CA.Applicant
- Jacobsen, et al., “Research robots for applications in artificial intelligence, teleoperation and entertainment”, International Journal of Robotics Research, 2004, pp. 319-330, vol. 23.Applicant
- Jacobsen, et al., “Multiregime MEMS sensor networks for smart structures,” Procs. SPIE 6th Annual Inter. Conf. on Smart Structues and Materials, Mar. 1-5, 1999, pp. 19-32, vol. 3673, Newport Beach CA.Applicant
- Maclean et al., “A digital MEMS-based strain gage for structural health monitoring,” Procs. 1997 MRS Fall Meeting Symposium, Nov. 30-Dec. 4, 1997, pp. 309-320, Boston Massachusetts.Applicant
- Berlin et al., “MEMS-based control of structural dynamic instability”, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Jul. 1998 pp. 574-586, vol. 9.Applicant
- Goldfarb, “Design and energetic characterization of a liquid-propellant-powered actuator for self-powered robots,” IEEE Transactions On Mechatronics, Jun. 2003, vol. 8 No. 2.Applicant
- Dowling, “Limbless Locomotion: Learning to crawl with a snake robot,” The Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, Dec. 1997, pp. 1-150.Applicant
- Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 12/171,144, filed Jul. 10, 2008.Applicant
- Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 12/171,146, filed Jul. 10, 2008.Applicant
- Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 12/151,730, filed May 7, 2008.Applicant
- Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 12/117,233, filed May 8, 2008.Applicant
- Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 11/293,701, filed Dec. 1, 2005.Applicant
- Jacobsen, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/350,693, filed Jan. 8, 2009.Applicant
- Ren Luo “Development of a multibehavior-based mobile robot for remote supervisory control through the internet” IEEE/ ASME Transactions on mechatronics, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NY, Dec 1, 2000, vol. 5, No. 4.Applicant
- Nilas Sueset et al., “A PDA-based high-level human-robot interaction” Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, IEEE Conference Singapore, Dec. 1-3, 2004, vol. 2, pp. 1158-1163.Applicant
- Jacobsen, U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,996, filed Jan. 27, 2010.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,996, filed Jan. 27, 2010; Stephen C. Jacobsen; Office Action Issued Sep. 30, 2010.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/151,730, filed May 7, 2008; Stephen C. Jacobsen; Office Action Issued Nov. 15, 2010.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/171,144, filed Jul. 10, 2008; Stephen C. Jacobsen; Office Action Issued Aug. 11, 2010.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,324, filed Nov. 13, 2007; Stephen C. Jacobsen; Office Action Issued Nov. 1, 2010.Applicant
- PCT/US10/38331; filed Jun. 11, 2009; Stephen C. Jacobsen; ISR Issued Dec. 1, 2010.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,881, filed Jun. 22, 2010; Stephen C. Jacobsen; office action issued Nov. 30, 2010.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/171,144, filed Jul. 10, 2008; Stephen C. Jacobsen; office action mailed Jan. 13, 2011.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,996, filed Jan. 27, 2010; Stephen C. Jacobsen; office action mailed Jan. 26, 2011.Applicant
- PCT Application PCT/US2010/038339; filing date Nov. 6, 2010; Stephen C. Jacobsen; ISR mailed Sep. 2, 2011.Applicant
- Matthew Heverly & Jaret Matthews: “A wheel-on-limb rover for lunar operation” Internet article, Nov. 5, 2008, pp. 1-8, http://robotics.estec.esa.Int/I-SAIRAS/Isairas2008/Proceedings/SESSION%2026/rn116-Heverly.pdf.Applicant
- NASA: “Nasa's newest concept vehicles take off-roading out of this world” Internet article, Nov. 5, 2008, http://www.nasa.gov/mission—pages/constellation/main/lunar—truck.html.Applicant
- Revue Internationale De defense, “3-D vision and urchin” Oct. 1, 1988, p. 1292, vol. 21, No. 10, Geneve CH.Applicant
- Advertisement, International Defense review, Jane's information group, Nov. 1, 1990, p. 54, vol. 23, No. 11, Great Britain.Applicant