US 7,992,572 B2Grant
Methods of evaluating individuals having reversible obstructive pulmonary disease
Issue Date:2011-08-09
•11 Claims
•3 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
This relates to treating an asthmatic lung and more particularly, relates to advancing a treatment device into the lung and treating the lung with the device. This also includes additional steps of treating the airway wall, applying energy or heat to the airway wall in an asthmatic lung.
Metadata
Assignee
- Asthmatx, Inc.
Inventors
- Christopher James Danek
- Michael Biggs
- Bryan Loomas
- Michael D. Laufer
- Gary Kaplan
- Kelly M. Shriner
- William J. Wizeman
Application Information
Application Number:US 11/557,309
Filing Date:2006-11-07
Priority Date:1998-06-10
Art Unit:3774
Classifications
IPC:
A61B19/00A61B5/00A61B18/18A61N1/00A61F2/00
Patent Drawings (3 sheets)
Description
Cross-Reference to Related Applications
[0001] This application is a Continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/640,967 filed Aug. 13, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,273,055 B2 which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/535,856 filed Mar. 27, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,634,363 which is a Continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/296,040 filed Apr. 21, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,411,852 which is a Continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/095,323 filed Jun. 10, 1998; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/640,967 is also a Continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/436,455 filed Nov. 8, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,425,212 B1 which is a Continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/095,323 filed Jun. 10, 1998 and a Continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/349,715 filed Jul. 8, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,488,673. All of the above applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Background of the Invention
[0002] The invention relates to a method of treating a lung having at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease, and more particularly, the invention relates to advancing a treatment device into the lung and treating the lung with the device to at least reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one of the symptoms of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. The invention includes additional steps that reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one of the symptoms of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease and to reduce the resistance to the flow of air through a lung.
[0003] Reversible obstructive pulmonary disease includes asthma and reversible aspects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Asthma is a disease in which (i) bronchoconstriction, (ii) excessive mucus production, and (iii) inflammation and swelling of airways occur, causing widespread but variable airflow obstruction thereby making it difficult for the asthma sufferer to breathe. Asthma is a chronic disorder, primarily characterized by persistent airway inflammation. However, asthma is farther characterized by acute episodes of additional airway narrowing via contraction of hyper-responsive airway smooth muscle.
[0004] The reversible aspects of COPD generally describe excessive mucus production in the bronchial tree. Usually, there is a general increase in bulk (hypertrophy) of the large bronchi and chronic inflammatory changes in the small airways. Excessive amounts of mucus are found in the airways and semisolid plugs of mucus may occlude some small bronchi. Also, the small airways are narrowed and show inflammatory changes. The reversible aspects of COPD include partial airway occlusion by excess secretions, and airway narrowing secondary to smooth muscle contraction, bronchial wall edema and inflation of the airways
[0005] In asthma, chronic inflammatory-processes in the airway play a central role in increasing the resistance to airflow within the lungs. Many cells and cellular elements are involved in the inflammatory process, particularly mast cells, eosinophils T lymphocytes, neutrophils, epithelial cells, and even airway smooth muscle itself. The reactions of these cells result in an associated increase in the existing sensitivity and hyper-responsiveness of the airway smooth muscle cells that line the airways to the particular stimuli involved.
[0006] The chronic nature of asthma can also lead to remodeling of the airway wall (i.e., structural changes such as thickening or edema) which can further affect the function of the airway wall and influence airway hyper-responsiveness. Other physiologic changes associated with asthma include excess mucus production, and if the asthma is severe, mucus plugging, as well as ongoing epithelial denudation and repair. Epithelial denudation exposes the underlying tissue to substances that would not normally come in contact with them, further reinforcing the cycle of cellular damage and inflammatory response.
[0007] In susceptible individuals, asthma symptoms include recurrent episodes of shortness of breath (dyspnea), wheezing, chest tightness, and cough. Currently, asthma is managed by a combination of stimulus avoidance and pharmacology.
[0008] Stimulus avoidance is accomplished via systematic identification and minimization of contact with each type of stimuli. It may, however, be impractical and not always helpful to avoid all potential stimuli.
[0009] Asthma is managed pharmacologically by: (1) long term control through use of anti-inflammatories and long-acting bronchodilators and (2) short term management of acute exacerbations through use of short-acting bronchodilators. Both of these approaches require repeated and regular use of the prescribed drugs. High doses of corticosteroid anti-inflammatory drugs can have serious side effects that require careful management. In addition, some patients are resistant to steroid treatment. The difficulty involved in patient compliance with pharmacologic management and the difficulty of avoiding stimulus that triggers asthma are common barriers to successful asthma management.
[0010] Asthma is a serious disease with growing numbers of sufferers. Current management techniques are neither completely successful nor free from side effects.
[0011] Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide an asthma treatment which improves airflow without the need for patient compliance.
[0012] In addition to the airways of the lungs, other body conduits such as the esophagus, ureter, urethra, and coronary arteries, are also subject to periodic reversible spasms that produce obstruction to flow.
Summary of the Invention
[0013] The present invention relates to methods for treating a lung, preferably having at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease, comprising the steps of advancing a treatment device into the lung and treating the lung with the device to at least reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease and to decrease the resistance to the flow of air through the lung.
[0014] A variation of the invention includes the method described above further comprising the step of locating one or more treatment sites within an airway of the lung, selecting at least one of the treatment sites and treating at least one of the treatment sites selected in the selecting step. The invention may further include performing the steps while the lung is experiencing at least one symptom of either natural or artificially induced reversible obstructive pulmonary disease.
[0015] A further variation of the invention includes the method described above and further includes the steps of testing the lung for at least one pretreatment pulmonary function value prior to the treating step, and re-testing the lung for at least one post-treatment pulmonary function value subsequent to the treating step.
[0016] A further variation of the invention includes the method described above further comprising identifying treatment sites within the airway being highly susceptible to either airway inflammation, airway constriction, excessive mucus secretion, or any other symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease.
[0017] Another variation of the invention includes the method described above and the additional step of stimulating the lung to produce at least one artificially induced symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. The invention may further comprise the step of evaluating the results of the stimulating step.
[0018] Another variation of the invention includes the method described above where treating at least airway tissue within the lung further comprises the step of determining the effect of the treatment by visually observing the airway for blanching of airway tissue.
[0019] Another variation of the invention includes the method described above where treating at least airway tissue at a treatment site within the lung further comprises the step of monitoring electrical impedance of tissue at one or more points.
[0020] Another variation of the invention includes the method described above where treating the lung includes sub-mucosal treatment of at least airway tissue in the lung.
[0021] Another variation of the invention includes the method described above where the treating step includes treating the lung by depositing a radioactive substance in at least one treatment site within the lung.
[0022] Another variation of the invention include the method described above further including the step of scraping tissue from a wall of an airway within the lung prior to the treating step. The invention may further comprise depositing a substance on the scraped wall of the airway.
[0023] Another variation of the invention includes the method described above where the treating step uses a modality selected from the group consisting of mechanical, chemical, radio frequency, radioactive energy, heat, and ultrasound.
[0024] Another variation of the invention includes the method described above further comprising pre-treating the lung to at least reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease prior to the treating step, where at least one parameter of the pre-treating step is lesser than at least one parameter of the treating step.
[0025] Another variation of the invention comprises the method described above where the treating step includes separating the treating step into stages to reduce the healing load on the lung. The separating step may comprise treating different regions of the lung at different times or dividing the number of treatment sites into a plurality of groups of treatment sites and treating each group at a different time.
[0026] Another variation of the invention includes the method described above further comprising sensing movement of the lung and repositioning the treatment device in response to said sensing step.
[0027] Another variation of the invention includes the method described above further comprising reducing the temperature of lung tissue adjacent to a treatment site.
[0028] Another variation of the invention includes the method described above further comprising the step of providing drug therapy, exercise therapy, respiratory therapy, and/or education on disease management techniques to further reduce the effects of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease.
[0029] The invention farther includes the method for reversing a treatment to reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease comprising the step of stimulating re-growth of smooth muscle tissue in the lung.
[0030] The invention further includes the method of evaluating an individual having reversible obstructive pulmonary disease as a candidate for a procedure to reduce the ability of the individual's lung to produce at least one reversible obstructive pulmonary disease symptom by treating an airway within the lung of the individual, the method comprising the steps of assessing the pulmonary condition of the individual, comparing the pulmonary condition to a corresponding predetermined state; and evaluating the individual based upon the comparing step. The method may additionally comprise the steps of performing pulmonary function tests on the individual to obtain at least one pulmonary function value, comparing the at least one pulmonary function value to a corresponding predetermined pulmonary function value, and evaluating the individual based upon the comparing step.
[0031] The invention further comprises a method of evaluating the effectiveness of a procedure to reduce the ability of lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease previously performed on an individual having reversible obstructive pulmonary disease, the method comprising the steps of assessing the pulmonary condition of the individual, comparing the pulmonary condition to a corresponding predetermined state; and evaluating the effectiveness of the procedure based upon the comparing step. The method may additionally comprise the steps of performing pulmonary function tests on the individual to obtain at least one pulmonary function value, treating the lung to at least reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease, performing post-procedure pulmonary function tests on the individual to obtain at least one post-procedure pulmonary function value; and comparing the pulmonary function value with the post-procedure pulmonary function value to determine the effect of the treating step.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0032] The invention will now be described in greater detail with reference to the various embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings:
[0033] FIG. 1 . is a cross sectional view of an airway in a healthy lung.
[0034] FIG. 2 . shows a section through a bronchiole having an airway diameter smaller than that shown in FIG. 1 .
[0035] FIG. 3 illustrates the airway of FIG. 1 in which the smooth muscle 14 has hypertrophied and increased in thickness causing reduction of the airway diameter.
[0036] FIG. 4 is a schematic side view of the lungs being treated with a treatment device 38 as described herein.
Detailed Description
[0037] The invention relates to methods for improving airflow through the airways of a lung having reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. It is intended that the invention is applicable to any aspect of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease, including but not limited to asthma. One way of improving airflow is to decrease the resistance to airflow within the lungs. There are several approaches to reducing this resistance, including but not limited to reducing the ability of the airway to contract, increasing the airway diameter, reducing the inflammation of airway tissues, and/or reducing the amount of mucus plugging of the airway. The present invention includes advancing a treatment device into the lung and treating the lung to at least reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. The following is a brief discussion of some causes of increased resistance to airflow within the lungs and the inventive treatment of the invention described herein. As such, the following discussion is not intended to limit the aspects or objective of the inventive method as the inventive method may cause physiological changes not described below but such changes still contributing to reducing or eliminating at least one of the symptoms of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease.
[0038] Reducing the Ability of the Airway to Contract
[0039] The inventive treatment reduces the ability of the airways to narrow or to reduce in diameter due to airway smooth muscle contraction. The inventive treatment uses a modality of treatments including, but not limited to the following: chemical, radio frequency, radioactivity, heat, ultrasound, radiant, laser, microwave, or mechanical energy (such as in the form of cutting, punching, abrading, rubbing, or dilating). This treatment reduces the ability of the smooth muscle to contract thereby lessening the severity of an asthma attack. The reduction in the ability of the smooth muscle to contract may be achieved by treating the smooth muscle itself or by treating other tissues which in turn influence smooth muscle contraction or the response of the airway to the smooth muscle contraction. Treatment may also reduce airway responsiveness or the tendency of the airway to narrow or to constrict in response to a stimulus.
[0040] The amount of smooth muscle surrounding the airway can be reduced by exposing the smooth muscle to energy which either kills the muscle cells or prevents these cells from replicating. The reduction in smooth muscle reduces the ability of the smooth muscle to contract and to narrow the airway during a spasm. The reduction in smooth muscle and surrounding tissue has the added potential benefit of increasing the caliber or diameter of the airways, this benefit reduces the resistance to airflow through the airways. In addition to the use of debulking smooth muscle tissue to open up the airways, the device used in the present invention may also eliminate smooth muscle altogether by damaging or destroying the muscle. The elimination of the smooth muscle prevents the contraction or spasms of hyper-reactive airways of a patient having reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. By doing so, the elimination of the smooth muscle may reduce some symptoms of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease.
[0041] The ability of the airway to contract can also be altered by treatment of the smooth muscle in particular patterns. The smooth muscle is arranged around the airways in a generally helical pattern with pitch angles ranging from about −38 to about +38 degrees. Thus, the treatment of the smooth muscle in appropriate patterns interrupts or cuts through the helical pattern of the smooth muscle at a proper pitch and prevents the airway from constricting. This procedure of patterned treatment application eliminates contraction of the airways without completely eradicating smooth muscle and other airway tissue. A pattern for treatment may be chosen from a variety of patterns including longitudinal or axial stripes, circumferential bands, helical stripes, and the like as well as spot patterns having rectangular, elliptical, circular or other shapes. The size, number, and spacing of the treatment bands, stripes, or spots are chosen to provide a desired clinical effect of reduced airway responsiveness while limiting insult to the airway to a clinically acceptable level.
[0042] The patterned treatment of the tissues surrounding the airways with energy provides various advantages. The careful selection of the portion of the airway to be treated allows desired results to be achieved while reducing the total healing load. Patterned treatment can also achieve desired results with decreased morbidity, preservation of epithelium, and preservation of a continuous or near continuous ciliated inner surface of the airway for mucociliary clearance. The pattern of treatment may also be chosen to achieve desired results while limiting total treatment area and/or the number of airways treated, thereby improving speed and ease of treatment.
[0043] Application of energy to the tissue surrounding the airways may also cause the DNA of the cells to become cross linked. The treated cells with cross linked DNA are incapable of replicating. Accordingly, over time, as the smooth muscle cells die, the total thickness of smooth muscle decreases because of the inability of the cells to replicate. The programmed cell death causing a reduction in the volume of tissue is called apoptosis. This treatment does not cause an immediate effect but causes shrinking of the smooth muscle and opening of the airway over time and substantially prevents re-growth. The application of energy to the walls of the airway may also be used to cause a cross linking of the DNA of the mucus gland cells thereby preventing them from replicating and reducing excess mucus plugging or production over time.
[0044] The ability of the airways to contract may also be reduced by altering mechanical properties of the airway wall, such as by increasing stiffness of the wall or by increasing parenchymal tethering of the airway wall. Both of these methods increase the strength of the airway wall and further oppose contraction and narrowing of the airway.
[0045] There are several ways to increase the stiffness of the airway wall. One way to increase stiffness is to induce fibrosis or a wound healing response by causing trauma to the airway wall. The trauma can be caused by delivery of therapeutic energy to the tissue in the airway wall, by mechanical insult to the tissue, or by chemically affecting the tissue. The energy is preferably delivered in such a way that it minimizes or limits the intra-luminal thickening that may occur.
[0046] Another way to increase the effective stiffness of the airway wall is to alter the submucosal folding of the airway upon narrowing. The mucosal layer includes the epithelium, its basement membrane, and the lamina propria, a subepithelial collagen layer. The submucosal layer may also play a role in airway folding. As an airway narrows, its perimeter remains relatively constant, with the mucosal layer folding upon itself. As the airway narrows further, the mucosal folds mechanically interfere with each other, effectively stiffening the airway. In asthmatic patients, the number of folds is fewer and the size of the folds is larger, and thus, the airway is free to narrow with less mechanical interference of mucosal folds than in a healthy patient. Thus, asthmatic patients have a decrease in airway stiffness and the airways have less resistance to narrowing.
[0047] The mucosal folding in asthmatic patients can be improved by treatment of the airway in a manner which encourages folding. Preferably, a treatment will increase the number of folds and/or decrease the size of the folds in the mucosal layer. For example, treatment of the airway wall in a pattern such as longitudinal stripes can encourage greater number of smaller mucosal folds and increase airway stiffness.
[0048] The mucosal folding can also be increased by encouraging a greater number of smaller folds by reducing the thickness of the mucosa and/or submucosal layer. The decreased thickness of the mucosa or submucosa may be achieved by application of energy which either reduces the number of cells in the mucosa or submucosal layer or which prevents replication of the cells in the mucosa or submucosal layer. A thinner mucosa or submucosal layer will have an increased tendency to fold and increased mechanical stiffening caused by the folds.
[0049] Another way to reduce the ability of the airways to contract is to improve parenchymal tethering. The parenchyma surrounds airways and includes the alveolus and tissue connected to and surrounding the outer portion of the airway wall. The parenchyma includes the alveolus and tissue connected to and surrounding the cartilage that supports the larger airways. In a healthy patient, the parenchyma provides a tissue network which connects to and helps to support the airway. Edema or accumulation of fluid in lung tissue in patients with asthma or COPD is believed to decouple the airway from the parenchyma reducing the restraining force of the parenchyma which opposes airway constriction. Energy can be used to treat the parenchyma to reduce edema and/or improve parenchymal tethering.
[0050] In addition, the applied energy may be used to improve connection between the airway smooth muscle and submucosal layer to the surrounding cartilage, and to encourage wound healing, collagen deposition, and/or fibrosis in the tissue surrounding the airway to help support the airway and prevent airway contraction.
[0051] Increasing the Airway Diameter
[0052] Hypertrophy of smooth muscle, chronic inflammation of airway tissues, and general thickening of all parts of the airway wall can reduce the airway diameter in patients with reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. Increasing the overall airway diameter using a variety of techniques can improve the passage of air through the airways. Application of energy to the airway smooth muscle of an asthmatic patient can debulk or reduce the volume of smooth muscle. This reduced volume of smooth muscle increases the airway diameter for improved air exchange.
[0053] Reducing inflammation and edema of the tissue surrounding the airway can also increase the diameter of an airway. Inflammation and edema (accumulation of fluid) of the airway are chronic features of asthma. The inflammation and edema can be reduced by application of energy to stimulate wound healing and regenerate normal tissue. Healing of the epithelium or sections of the epithelium experiencing ongoing denudation and renewal allows regeneration of healthy epithelium with less associated airway inflammation. The less inflamed airway has an increased airway diameter both at a resting state and in constriction. The wound healing can also deposit collagen which improves parenchymal tethering.
[0054] Inflammatory mediators released by tissue in the airway wall may serve as a stimulus for airway smooth muscle contraction. Therapy that reduces the production and release of inflammatory mediator can reduce smooth muscle contraction, inflammation of the airways, and edema. Examples of inflammatory mediators are cytokines, chemokines, and histamine. The tissues which produce and release inflammatory mediators include airway smooth muscle, epithelium, and mast cells. Treatment of these structures with energy can reduce the ability of the airway structures to produce or release inflammatory mediators. The reduction in released inflammatory mediators will reduce chronic inflammation, thereby increasing the airway inner diameter, and may also reduce hyper-responsiveness of the airway smooth muscle.
[0055] A further process for increasing the airway diameter is by denervation. A resting tone of smooth muscle is nerve regulated by release of catecholamines. Thus, by damaging or eliminating nerve tissue in the airways the resting tone of the smooth muscle is reduced, and the airway diameter is increased. Resting tone may also be reduced by directly affecting the ability of smooth muscle tissue to contract.
[0056] Reducing Plugging of the Airway
[0057] Excess mucus production and mucus plugging are common problems during both acute asthma exacerbation and in chronic asthma management. Excess mucus in the airways increases the resistance to airflow through the airways by physically blocking all or part of the airway. Excess mucus may also contribute to increased numbers of leukocytes found in airways of asthmatic patients by trapping leukocytes. Thus, excess mucus can increase chronic inflammation of the airways.
[0058] One type of asthma therapy involves treatment of the airways with energy to target and reduce the amount of mucus producing cells and glands and to reduce the effectiveness of the remaining mucus producing cells and glands. The treatment can eliminate all or a portion of the mucus producing cells and glands, can prevent the cells from replicating or can inhibit their ability to secrete mucus. This treatment will have both chronic benefits in increasing airflow through the airways and will lessen the severity of acute exacerbation of the symptoms of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease.
[0059] Application of Treatment
[0060] The following illustrations are examples of the invention described herein. It is contemplated that combinations of aspects of specific embodiments or combinations of the specific embodiments themselves are within the scope of this disclosure.
[0061] FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate cross sections of two different airways in a healthy patient. The airway of FIG. 1 is a medium sized bronchus having an airway diameter D1 of about 3 mm. FIG. 2 shows a section through a bronchiole having an airway diameter D2 of about 1.5 mm. Each airway includes a folded inner surface or epithelium 10 surrounded by stroma 12 and smooth muscle tissue 14. The larger airways including the bronchus shown in FIG. 1 also have mucous glands 16 and cartilage 18 surrounding the smooth muscle tissue 14. Nerve fibers 20 and blood vessels 24 also surround the airway.
[0062] FIG. 3 illustrates the bronchus of FIG. 1 in which the smooth muscle 14 has hypertrophied and increased in thickness causing the airway diameter to be reduced from the diameter D1 to a diameter D3.
[0063] FIG. 4 is a schematic side view of the lungs being treated with a treatment device 38 according to the present invention. The treatment device 38 is an elongated member for treating tissue at a treatment site 34 within a lung. Although the invention discusses treatment of tissue at the surface it is also intended that the invention include treatment below an epithelial layer of the lung tissue.
[0064] An example of devices for use with the methods of this invention are found in the following U.S. patent applications: Ser. No. 09/095,323—Methods and Apparatus for Treating Smooth Muscles in the Walls of Body Conduits; Ser. No. 09/349,715—Method of Increasing Gas Exchange of a Lung now U.S. Pat. No. 6,488,675; and Ser. No. 09/296,040—Devices for Modification of Airways By Transfer of Energy now U.S. Pat. No. 6,411,852; Ser. No. 09/436,455 Devices for Modification of Airways by Transfer of Energy. The entirety of each of the aforementioned applications is incorporated by reference herein.
[0065] The treatment of an airway with the treatment device may involve placing a visualization system such as an endoscope or bronchoscope into the airways. The treatment device is then inserted through or next to the bronchoscope or endoscope while visualizing the airways. Alternatively, the visualization system may be built directly into the treatment device using fiber optic imaging and lenses or a CCD and lens arranged at the distal portion of the treatment device. The treatment device may also be positioned using radiographic visualization such as fluoroscopy or other external visualization means. The treatment device which has been positioned with a distal end within an airway to be treated is energized so that energy is applied to the tissue of the airway walls in a desired pattern and intensity. The distal end of the treatment device may be moved through the airway in a uniform painting like motion to expose the entire length of an airway to be treated to the energy. The treatment device may be passed axially along the airway one or more times to achieve adequate treatment. The “painting-like” motion used to exposed the entire length of an airway to the energy may be performed by moving the entire treatment device from the proximal end either manually or by motor. Alternatively, segments, stripes, rings or other treatment patterns may be used.
[0066] According to one variation of the invention, the energy is transferred to or from an airway wall in the opening region of the airway, preferably within a length of approximately two times the airway diameter or less, and to wall regions of airways distal to bifurcations and side branches, preferably within a distance of approximately twice the airway diameter or less. The invention may also be used to treat long segments of un-bifurcated airway.
[0067] The invention includes a method of advancing a treatment device into a lung and treating the lung with the device to, at least, reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. It is contemplated that the treatment may reduce all of the symptoms of reversible obstructive disease. Alternatively, the treatment may be selected to address specific symptoms of the disease. It is also intended that the treatment of the lung may sufficiently reduce the symptoms of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease such that the patient is able to function as those free from the disease. Alternatively, the treatment may be such that the symptoms are reduced to allow the patient to more easily manage the disease. It is also intended that the effects of the treatment may be either long term or short term with repeating treatment necessary to suppress the symptoms.
[0068] The methods of the invention described herein may be performed while the lung is experiencing natural symptoms of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. One such example is where an individual, experiencing an asthma attack, or acute exacerbation of asthma or COPD, undergoes treatment to improve the individual's ability to breath. In such a case, the treatment, called ‘rescue,’ seeks to provide immediate relief for the patient.
[0069] The method may also include the steps of locating one or more treatment sites within an airway of the lung, selecting one of the treatment sites from the locating step and treating at least one of the selected treatment sites. As mentioned above, these steps may be, but are not necessarily, performed while the lung is experiencing symptoms of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease.
[0070] The invention may further comprise the step of stimulating the lung to produce at least one artificially induced symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. For example, stimulation of the lung would preferably increase the resistance to airflow within the lung, constrict airways within the lung, inflame/irritate airway tissues, increase edema and/or increase the amount of mucus plugging of the airway. Stimulation of the lung may occur at any point during the procedure or before the procedure. For example, the lung may be stimulated either prior to or after, the step of locating a treatment site. If the lung is stimulated prior to the step of locating a treatment site, the reaction of the stimulated tissue within the lung may be useful in determining which locations are to be selected as treatment sites. The lung tissue or airway tissue within the lung may be stimulated by a variety of methods including but not limited to pharmacological stimulation, (e.g., histamine, methacholine, or other bronchoconstricting agents, etc.), electrical stimulation, mechanical stimulation, or any other stimuli causing obstructive pulmonary symptoms. For example, electrical stimulation may comprise exposing airway tissue to electrical field stimulation. An example of such parameters include 15 VDC, 0.5 ms pulses, 0.5-16 Hz, and 70 VDC, 2-3 ms pulses, 20 HZ.
[0071] The locating step described above may be performed using a non-invasive imaging technique, including but not limited to, a bronchogram, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, radiography (e.g., x-ray), and ventilation perfusion scans.
[0072] The invention further includes the steps of testing the lung for at least one pre-treatment pulmonary function value prior to treating the lung with the device. After the lung is treated, the lung is re-tested for at least one post-treatment pulmonary function value. Naturally, the two pulmonary function values may be compared to estimate the effect of the treatment. The invention may also include treating additional sites in the lung after the re-testing step to at least reduce the effect of at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. The invention may also include stimulating the lung to produce at least one artificially induced symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. As mentioned above, the stimulation of the lung may occur at any point during, or prior to, the procedure. For example, stimulation of the lung may occur prior to the step of testing the lung for pre-treatment pulmonary values. In this case, the values would be determinative of pulmonary function values of a lung experiencing symptoms of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. Accordingly, the objective is to treat the lung until acceptable pulmonary function values are obtained. One benefit of such a procedure is that the effect of the treatment on the patient is more readily observed as compared to the situation where a patient, having previously been treated, must wait for an attack of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease to determine the efficacy of the treatment.
[0073] Pulmonary function values are well known in the art. The following is an example of pulmonary function values that may be used. Other pulmonary function values, or combinations thereof, are intended to be within the scope of this invention. The values include, but are not limited to, FEV (forced expiratory volume), FVC (forced vital capacity), FEF (forced expiratory flow), Vmax (maximum flow), PEFR (peak expiratory flow rate), FRC (functional residual capacity), RV (residual volume), TLC (total lung capacity).
[0074] FEV measures the volume of air exhaled over a pre-determined period of time by a forced expiration immediately after a fall inspiration. FVC measures the total volume of air exhaled immediately after a fall inspiration. Forced expiratory flow measures the volume of air exhaled during a FVC divided by the time in seconds. Vmax is the maximum flow measured during FVC. PEFR measures the maximum flow rate during a forced exhale starting from full inspiration. RV is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after a fall expiration.
[0075] The locating step described above may also comprise identifying treatment sites within the airway being susceptible to a symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. For example, symptoms may include, but are not limited to, airway inflammation, airway constriction, excessive mucous secretion, or any other asthmatic symptom. Stimulation of the lung to produce symptoms of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease may assist in identifying ideal treatment sites.
[0076] As noted above, the method of the present invention may include stimulating the lung to produce at least one artificially induced symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease and further include the step of evaluating the result of stimulation of the lung. For example, the evaluating step may include visually evaluating the effect of the stimulating step on the airway using a bronchoscope with a visualization system or by non-invasive imaging techniques, such as those describe herein. The evaluating step may include measuring pressure changes in the airway before and after the stimulating step. Pressure may be measured globally (e.g., within the entire lung), or locally (e.g., within a specific section of the lung such as an airway or alveolar sac.) Also, the evaluating step may comprise measuring the electrical properties of the tissue before and after the stimulating step. The invention may also include evaluating the results of the stimulating step by combining any of the methods previously mentioned. Also, the invention may further comprise the step of selecting at least one treatment parameter based upon the results of the evaluating step. Such treatment parameters may include, but are not limited to, duration of treatment, intensity of treatment, temperature, amount of tissue treated, depth of treatment, etc.
[0077] The method may also include the step of determining the effect of the treatment by visually observing lung, airway or other such tissue for blanching of the tissue. The term “blanching” is intended to include any physical change in tissue that is usually, but not necessarily, accompanied by a change in the color of the tissue. One example of such blanching is where the tissue turns to a whitish color after the treatment of application of energy.
[0078] The invention may also include the step of monitoring impedance across a treated area of tissue within the lung. Measuring impedance may be performed in cases of monopolar or bipolar energy delivery devices. Additionally, impedance may be monitored at more than one site within the lungs. The measuring of impedance may be, but is not necessarily, performed by the same electrodes used to deliver the energy treatment to the tissue. Furthermore, the invention includes adjusting the treatment parameters based upon the monitoring of the change in impedance after the treatment step. For example, as the energy treatment affects the properties of the treated tissue, measuring changes in impedance may provide information useful in adjusting treatment parameters to obtain a desired result.
[0079] Another aspect of the invention includes advancing a treatment device into the lung and treating lung tissue to at least reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease and further comprising the step of sub-mucosal sensing of the treatment to the lung tissue. The sub-mucosal sensing may be invasive such as when using a probe equipped to monitor temperature, impedance, and/or blood flow. Or, the sub-mucosal sensing may be non-invasive in such cases as infra-red sensing.
[0080] The invention may also include using the treatment device to deposit radioactive substances at select treatment sites within the lung. The radioactive substances, including, but not limited to Iridium (e.g. 192Ir.) either treat the lung tissue over time or provide treatment upon being deposited.
[0081] The invention also includes scraping epithelial tissue from the wall of an airway within the lung prior to advancing a treatment device into the lung to treat the lung tissue. The removal of the epithelial tissue allows the device to treat the walls of an airway more effectively. The invention further comprises the step of depositing a substance on the scraped wall of the airway after the device treats the airway wall. The substance may include epithelial tissue, collagen, growth factors, or any other bio-compatible tissue or substance, which promotes healing, prevent infection, and/or assists in the clearing of mucus. Alternatively, the treatment may comprise the act of scraping epithelial tissue to induce yield the desired response.
[0082] The invention includes using the treating device to pre-treat the lung to at least reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease prior to the treating step. At least one of the parameters of the pre-treating step may differ than one of the parameters of the treating step. Such parameters may include time, temperature, amount of tissue over which treatment is applied, amount of energy applied, depth of treatment, etc.
[0083] The invention may also include advancing the treatment device into the lung and treating the lung tissue in separate stages. One of the benefits of dividing the treating step into separate stages is that the healing load of the patient is lessened. Dividing of the treating step may be accomplished by treating different regions of the lung at different times. Or, the total number of treatment sites may be divided into a plurality of groups of treatment sites, where each group of treatment sites is treated at a different time. The amount of time between treatments may be chosen such that the healing load placed on the lungs is minimized.
[0084] The invention may also include advancing a treatment device into the lung, treating the lung with the device and sensing movement of the lung to reposition the treatment device in response to the movement. This sensing step accounts for the tidal motion of the lung during breathing cycles or other movement. Taking into account the tidal motion allows improved accuracy in repositioning of the device at a desired target.
[0085] The invention may also include the additional step of reducing or stabilizing the temperature of lung tissue near to a treatment site. This may be accomplished for example, by injecting a cold fluid into lung parenchyma or into the airway being treated, where the airway is proximal, distal, or circumferentially adjacent to the treatment site. The fluid may be sterile normal saline, or any other bio-compatible fluid. The fluid may be injected into treatment regions within the lung while other regions of the lung normally ventilated by gas. Or, the fluid may be oxygenated to eliminate the need for alternate ventilation of the lung. Upon achieving the desired reduction or stabilization of temperature the fluid may be removed from the lungs. In the case where a gas is used to reduce temperature, the gas may be removed from the lung or allowed to be naturally exhaled. One benefit of reducing or stabilizing the temperature of the lung may be to prevent excessive destruction of the tissue, or to prevent destruction of certain types of tissue such as the epithelium, or to reduce the systemic healing load upon the patient's lung.
[0086] Also contemplated as within the scope of the invention is the additional step of providing therapy to further reduce the effects of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease or which aids the healing process after such treatment. Some examples of therapy include, drug therapy, exercise therapy, and respiratory therapy. The invention further includes providing education on reversible obstructive pulmonary disease management techniques to further reduce the effects of the disease. For example, such techniques may be instruction on lifestyle changes, self-monitoring techniques to assess the state of the disease, and/or medication compliance education.
[0087] There may be occurrences where it is necessary to reverse the effects of the treatment described herein. Accordingly, the invention further includes a method for reversing a treatment to reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease comprising the step of stimulating re-growth of smooth muscle tissue. The re-stimulation of the muscle may be accomplished by the use of electro-stimulation, exercising of the muscle and/or drug therapy.
[0088] The invention further includes methods of evaluating individuals having reversible obstructive pulmonary disease, or a symptom thereof, as a candidate for a procedure to reduce the ability of the individual's lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. The method comprises the steps of assessing the pulmonary condition of the individual, comparing the pulmonary condition to a corresponding pre-determined state, and evaluate the individual as a candidate based upon the comparison.
[0089] In assessing the pulmonary condition, the method may comprise the steps of performing pulmonary function tests on the individual to obtain a pulmonary function value which is compared to a predetermined value. Examples of pre-determined values are found above.
[0090] The method of evaluating may further include the step of determining how the individual's tissue will react to treatment allowing the treatment to be tailored to the expected tissue response.
[0091] The method of evaluating may further comprises the step of pulmonary function testing using a gas, a mixture of gases, or a composition of several mixtures of gases to ventilate the lung. The difference in properties of the gases may aid in the pulmonary function testing. For example, comparison of one or more pulmonary function test values that are obtained with the patient breathing gas mixtures of varying densities may help to diagnose lung function. Examples of such mixtures include air, at standard atmospheric conditions, and a mixture of helium and oxygen. Additional examples of pulmonary testing include tests that measure capability and evenness of ventilation given diffusion of special gas mixtures. Other examples of gases used in the described tests, include but are not limited to, nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and a range of inert gases.
[0092] The method of evaluating may also include the step of sub-mucosal imaging of the airway wall to determine if the individual will benefit from treatment and/or procedure effectiveness. Sub-mucosal imaging may be accomplished by performing minimally invasive, high resolution, real-time optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of airway mucosa, for example via a flexible bronchoscope. OCT is a high-resolution imaging technique (e.g., about 2 μm to about 10 μm) which is capable of generating real-time, near-histological, cross-sectional images of tissue up to a depth of about 1 mm to about 2 mm. OCT measures backscattered infrared light intensity using coherence interferometry to construct topographical tissue images. Sub-mucosal imaging may also be accomplished by a variety of other invasive and non-invasive imaging techniques. For example microscopy techniques may be utilized, such as confocal microscopy or reflectance microscopy, which are imaging techniques that produce high resolution images and 3-D reconstructions of tissue at various depths. Further, ultrasound imaging may also be employed to perform the evaluating step. Still farther, hyperpolarized helium may be fed into the lung in conjunction with non-invasive computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to evaluate suitable patients for treatment.
[0093] The invention may also comprise the step of stimulating the lung to produce at least one artificially induced symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. Stimulating the symptoms of the disease in an individual allows the individual to be evaluated as the individual experiences the symptoms thereby allowing appropriate adjustment of the treatment.
[0094] The method of evaluating may also comprise the step of obtaining clinical information from the individual and accounting for the clinical information for treatment.
[0095] The method may further comprise the selection of a patient for treatment based upon a classification of the subtype of the patient's disease. For example, in asthma there are a number of ways to classify the disease state. One such method is the assessment of the severity of the disease. An example of a classification scheme by severity is found in the NHLBI Expert Panel 2 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Asthma. Another selection method may include selecting a patient by the type of trigger that induces the exacerbation. Such triggers may be classified further by comparing allergic versus non-allergic triggers. For instance, an exercise induced bronchospasm (EIB) is an example of a non-allergenic trigger. The allergic sub-type may be further classified according to specific triggers (e.g., dust mites, animal dander, etc.). Another classification of the allergic sub-type may be according to characteristic features of the immune system response such as levels of IgE (a class of antibodies that function in allergic reactions, also called immunoglobulin). Yet another classification of allergic sub-types may be according to the expression of genes controlling certain interleukins (e.g., IL-4, IL-5, etc.) which have been shown to play a key role in certain types of asthma.
[0096] The invention further comprises methods to determine the completion of the procedure and the effectiveness of the reduction in the lung's ability to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease. This variation of the invention comprises assessing the pulmonary condition of the individual, comparing the pulmonary condition to a corresponding predetermined state, and evaluating the effectiveness of the procedure based on the comparison. The invention may also comprise the steps of performing pulmonary function tests on the individual to obtain at least one pulmonary function value, treating the lung to at least reduce the ability of the lung to produce at least one symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease, performing a post-procedure pulmonary function tests on the individual to obtain at least one post pulmonary function value and comparing the two values.
[0097] This variation of the invention comprises obtaining clinical information, evaluating the clinical information with the results of the test to determine the effectiveness of the procedure. Furthermore, the variation may include stimulating the lung to produce a symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease, assessing the pulmonary condition of the patient, then repeating the stimulation before the post-procedure pulmonary therapy. These steps allow comparison of the lung function when it is experiencing symptoms of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease, before and after the treatment, thereby allowing for an assessment of the improved efficiency of the lung during an attack of the disease.
[0098] The invention herein is described by examples and a desired way of practicing the invention is described. However, the invention as claimed herein is not limited to that specific description in any manner. Equivalence to the description as hereinafter claimed is considered to be within the scope of protection of this patent.
Claims
Certificate of Correction present
The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.
What is claimed is:
1. A method of evaluating to eliminate or treat an individual having been previously diagnosed with a reversible obstructive pulmonary disease as a candidate for a treatment procedure to reduce the ability of a lung of the individual to produce a reversible obstructive pulmonary disease symptom by delivering energy to an airway wall within the lung of the individual, the method comprising:
performing a pulmonary function test on the individual to obtain a measured total lung pulmonary function value;
comparing the measured total lung pulmonary function value to a corresponding predetermined efficacy pulmonary function value that defines an efficacy threshold for the procedure in patients that have been diagnosed with the reversible obstructive pulmonary disease; and
treating the individual with the treatment procedure only if the measured total lung pulmonary function value meets the efficacy pulmonary function value, wherein treating the individual includes (a) inserting an energy delivery device into an airway of the lung of the individual and (b) actuating the energy delivery device multiple times as the energy delivery device is moved along the airway to deliver energy along the length of the airway wall at a plurality of treatment sites to form a repeating pattern of treated segments extending along the length of the airway such that the ability of the airway to contract is reduced.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising assessing a total lung pulmonary function value of the individual, wherein the total lung pulmonary function value comprises a forced expiratory volume, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory flow, maximum flow, peak expiratory flow rate, functional residual capacity, residual volume, total lung capacity, or a combination thereof.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising assessing a total lung pulmonary condition of the individual, wherein the assessing comprises determining a subtype of asthma.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein determining further comprises assessing a trigger that induces the asthma in the individual.
5. The method of claim 3, wherein determining further comprises assessing a characteristic feature of an immune system response in the individual having asthma.
6. The method of claim 3, wherein determining further comprises assessing an expression of genes controlling an interleukin in the individual.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising assessing a total lung pulmonary condition of the individual and stimulating the lung to produce an artificially induced symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease prior to the assessing the total lung pulmonary condition.
8. A method of evaluating an effectiveness of a procedure to reduce the ability of a lung to produce a symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease previously performed on an individual having reversible obstructive pulmonary disease, the method comprising:
assessing a total lung pulmonary condition of the individual;
treating the lung by inserting an energy delivery device into an airway of the lung and actuating the energy delivery device multiple times as the energy deliver device is moved along the airway to deliver energy along the length of the airway wall at a plurality of treatment sites to form a repeating pattern of treated segments extending along the length of the airway such that the ability of the airway to contract is reduced;
assessing a total lung post-procedure pulmonary condition of the individual;
comparing the total lung pulmonary condition to the total lung post-procedure pulmonary condition after treating the lung; and
evaluating the effectiveness of the procedure based upon the act of comparing.
9. The method of claim 8, further comprising:
performing a total lung pulmonary function test on the individual to obtain a pulmonary function value;
performing a total lung post-procedure pulmonary function test on the individual to obtain a post-procedure total lung pulmonary function value; and
comparing the total lung pulmonary function value with the post-procedure total lung pulmonary function value to determine an effect of the treatment.
10. The method of claim 9, further comprising stimulating the lung to produce an artificially induced symptom of reversible obstructive pulmonary disease prior to performing the total lung pulmonary function test and the post-procedure total lung pulmonary function test.
11. The method of claim 8, further comprising obtaining clinical information from the individual, wherein evaluating further comprises accounting for the clinical information to assess the effectiveness of the procedure.
Patent Citations (571)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US612724(A) | 1898-10-01 | Hamilton | Applicant |
| US1155169(A) | 1915-09-01 | Starkweather | Applicant |
| US1207479(A) | 1916-12-01 | Bisgaard | Applicant |
| US1216183(A) | 1917-02-01 | Swingle | Applicant |
| US2072346(A) | 1937-03-01 | Smith | Applicant |
| US3320957(A) | 1967-05-01 | Sokolik | Applicant |
| US3568659(A) | 1971-03-01 | Karnegis | Applicant |
| US3667476(A) | 1972-06-01 | Muller | Applicant |
| US3692029(A) | 1972-09-01 | Adair | Applicant |
| US3995617(A) | 1976-12-01 | Watkins et al. | Applicant |
| US4095602(A) | 1978-06-01 | Leveen | Applicant |
| US4116589(A) | 1978-09-01 | Rishton | Applicant |
| US4129129(A) | 1978-12-01 | Amrine | Applicant |
| US4154246(A) | 1979-05-01 | LeVeen | Applicant |
| US4461283(A) | 1984-07-01 | Doi | Applicant |
| US4502490(A) | 1985-03-01 | Evans et al. | Applicant |
| US4503855(A) | 1985-03-01 | Maslanka | Applicant |
| US4512762(A) | 1985-04-01 | Spears | Applicant |
| US4522212(A) | 1985-06-01 | Gelinas et al. | Applicant |
| US4557272(A) | 1985-12-01 | Carr | Applicant |
| US4565200(A) | 1986-01-01 | Cosman | Applicant |
| US4567882(A) | 1986-02-01 | Heller | Applicant |
| US4584998(A) | 1986-04-01 | McGrail | Applicant |
| US4612934(A) | 1986-09-01 | Borkan | Applicant |
| US4621642(A) | 1986-11-01 | Chen | Applicant |
| US4621882(A) | 1986-11-01 | Krumme | Applicant |
| US4625712(A) | 1986-12-01 | Wampler | Applicant |
| US4643186(A) | 1987-02-01 | Rosen et al. | Applicant |
| US4646737(A) | 1987-03-01 | Hussein et al. | Applicant |
| US4674497(A) | 1987-06-01 | Ogasawara | Applicant |
| US4683890(A) | 1987-08-01 | Hewson | Applicant |
| US4704121(A) | 1987-11-01 | Moise | Applicant |
| US4706688(A) | 1987-11-01 | Don Michael et al. | Applicant |
| US4709698(A) | 1987-12-01 | Johnston et al. | Applicant |
| US4739759(A) | 1988-04-01 | Rexroth et al. | Applicant |
| US4754065(A) | 1988-06-01 | Levenson et al. | Applicant |
| US4754752(A) | 1988-07-01 | Ginsburg et al. | Applicant |
| US4765959(A) | 1988-08-01 | Fukasawa | Applicant |
| US4772112(A) | 1988-09-01 | Zider et al. | Applicant |
| US4773899(A) | 1988-09-01 | Spears | Applicant |
| US4779614(A) | 1988-10-01 | Moise | Applicant |
| US4784135(A) | 1988-11-01 | Blum et al. | Applicant |
| US4790305(A) | 1988-12-01 | Zoltan et al. | Applicant |
| US4796639(A) | 1989-01-01 | Snow et al. | Examiner |
| US4799479(A) | 1989-01-01 | Spears | Applicant |
| US4802492(A) | 1989-02-01 | Grunstein | Examiner |
| US4817586(A) | 1989-04-01 | Wampler | Applicant |
| US4825871(A) | 1989-05-01 | Cansell | Applicant |
| US4827935(A) | 1989-05-01 | Geddes et al. | Applicant |
| US4846152(A) | 1989-07-01 | Wampler et al. | Applicant |
| US4852582(A) | 1989-08-01 | Pell | Examiner |
| US4862886(A) | 1989-09-01 | Clarke et al. | Applicant |
| US4895557(A) | 1990-01-01 | Moise et al. | Applicant |
| US4906229(A) | 1990-03-01 | Wampler | Applicant |
| US4907589(A) | 1990-03-01 | Cosman | Applicant |
| US4908012(A) | 1990-03-01 | Moise et al. | Applicant |
| US4920978(A) | 1990-05-01 | Colvin | Applicant |
| US4944722(A) | 1990-07-01 | Carriker et al. | Applicant |
| US4955377(A) | 1990-09-01 | Lennox et al. | Applicant |
| US4967765(A) | 1990-11-01 | Turner et al. | Applicant |
| US4969865(A) | 1990-11-01 | Hwang et al. | Applicant |
| US4976709(A) | 1990-12-01 | Sand | Applicant |
| US4985014(A) | 1991-01-01 | Orejola | Applicant |
| US4991603(A) | 1991-02-01 | Cohen et al. | Applicant |
| US5009636(A) | 1991-04-01 | Wortley et al. | Applicant |
| US5009936(A) | 1991-04-01 | Yamanaka et al. | Applicant |
| US5010892(A) | 1991-04-01 | Colvin et al. | Applicant |
| US5019075(A) | 1991-05-01 | Spears et al. | Applicant |
| US5027829(A) | 1991-07-01 | Larsen | Applicant |
| US5030645(A) | 1991-07-01 | Kollonitsch | Applicant |
| US5036848(A) | 1991-08-01 | Hewson | Applicant |
| US5053033(A) | 1991-10-01 | Clarke | Applicant |
| US5056519(A) | 1991-10-01 | Vince | Applicant |
| US5074860(A) | 1991-12-01 | Gregory et al. | Applicant |
| US5078716(A) | 1992-01-01 | Doll | Applicant |
| US5084044(A) | 1992-01-01 | Quint | Applicant |
| US5096916(A) | 1992-03-01 | Skupin | Applicant |
| US5100388(A) | 1992-03-01 | Behl et al. | Applicant |
| US5100423(A) | 1992-03-01 | Fearnot | Applicant |
| US5103804(A) | 1992-04-01 | Abele et al. | Applicant |
| US5105826(A) | 1992-04-01 | Smits et al. | Applicant |
| US5106360(A) | 1992-04-01 | Ishiwara et al. | Applicant |
| US5107830(A) | 1992-04-01 | Younes | Applicant |
| US5114423(A) | 1992-05-01 | Kasprzyk et al. | Applicant |
| US5116864(A) | 1992-05-01 | March et al. | Applicant |
| US5117828(A) | 1992-06-01 | Metzger et al. | Applicant |
| US5135517(A) | 1992-08-01 | McCoy | Applicant |
| US5152286(A) | 1992-10-01 | Sitko et al. | Applicant |
| US5165420(A) | 1992-11-01 | Strickland | Applicant |
| US5167223(A) | 1992-12-01 | Koros et al. | Applicant |
| US5170803(A) | 1992-12-01 | Hewson et al. | Applicant |
| US5174288(A) | 1992-12-01 | Bardy et al. | Applicant |
| US5188602(A) | 1993-02-01 | Nichols | Applicant |
| US5191883(A) | 1993-03-01 | Lennox et al. | Applicant |
| US5213576(A) | 1993-05-01 | Abiuso et al. | Applicant |
| US5215103(A) | 1993-06-01 | Desai | Applicant |
| US5231996(A) | 1993-08-01 | Bardy et al. | Applicant |
| US5232444(A) | 1993-08-01 | Just et al. | Applicant |
| US5234456(A) | 1993-08-01 | Silvestrini | Applicant |
| US5254088(A) | 1993-10-01 | Lundquist et al. | Applicant |
| US5255678(A) | 1993-10-01 | Deslauriers et al. | Applicant |
| US5255679(A) | 1993-10-01 | Imran | Applicant |
| US5265604(A) | 1993-11-01 | Vince | Applicant |
| US5269758(A) | 1993-12-01 | Taheri | Applicant |
| US5281218(A) | 1994-01-01 | Imran | Applicant |
| US5292331(A) | 1994-03-01 | Boneau | Applicant |
| US5293869(A) | 1994-03-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US5309910(A) | 1994-05-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US5313943(A) | 1994-05-01 | Houser et al. | Applicant |
| US5324284(A) | 1994-06-01 | Imran | Applicant |
| US5343936(A) | 1994-09-01 | Beatenbough et al. | Applicant |
| US5345936(A) | 1994-09-01 | Pomeranz et al. | Applicant |
| US5366443(A) | 1994-11-01 | Eggers et al. | Applicant |
| US5368591(A) | 1994-11-01 | Lennox et al. | Applicant |
| US5370644(A) | 1994-12-01 | Langberg | Applicant |
| US5370679(A) | 1994-12-01 | Atlee, III | Applicant |
| US5374287(A) | 1994-12-01 | Rubin | Applicant |
| US5383917(A) | 1995-01-01 | Desai et al. | Applicant |
| US5393207(A) | 1995-02-01 | Maher et al. | Applicant |
| US5394880(A) | 1995-03-01 | Atlee, III | Applicant |
| US5396887(A) | 1995-03-01 | Imran | Applicant |
| US5400778(A) | 1995-03-01 | Jonson et al. | Applicant |
| US5400783(A) | 1995-03-01 | Pomeranz et al. | Applicant |
| US5411025(A) | 1995-05-01 | Webster, Jr. | Applicant |
| US5415166(A) | 1995-05-01 | Imran | Applicant |
| US5415656(A) | 1995-05-01 | Tihon et al. | Applicant |
| US5417687(A) | 1995-05-01 | Nardella et al. | Applicant |
| US5422362(A) | 1995-06-01 | Vincent et al. | Applicant |
| US5423744(A) | 1995-06-01 | Gencheff et al. | Applicant |
| US5423811(A) | 1995-06-01 | Imran et al. | Applicant |
| US5425023(A) | 1995-06-01 | Haraguchi et al. | Applicant |
| US5425703(A) | 1995-06-01 | Feiring | Applicant |
| US5425811(A) | 1995-06-01 | Mashita | Applicant |
| US5431696(A) | 1995-07-01 | Atlee, III | Applicant |
| US5433730(A) | 1995-07-01 | Alt | Applicant |
| US5437665(A) | 1995-08-01 | Munro | Applicant |
| US5443470(A) | 1995-08-01 | Stern et al. | Applicant |
| US5454782(A) | 1995-10-01 | Perkins | Applicant |
| US5456667(A) | 1995-10-01 | Ham et al. | Applicant |
| US5458596(A) | 1995-10-01 | Lax et al. | Applicant |
| US5465717(A) | 1995-11-01 | Imran et al. | Applicant |
| US5471982(A) | 1995-12-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US5474530(A) | 1995-12-01 | Passafaro et al. | Applicant |
| US5478309(A) | 1995-12-01 | Sweezer et al. | Applicant |
| US5496271(A) | 1996-03-01 | Burton et al. | Applicant |
| US5496311(A) | 1996-03-01 | Abele et al. | Applicant |
| US5496312(A) | 1996-03-01 | Klicek | Applicant |
| US5500011(A) | 1996-03-01 | Desai | Applicant |
| US5505728(A) | 1996-04-01 | Ellman et al. | Applicant |
| US5505730(A) | 1996-04-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US5507791(A) | 1996-04-01 | Sit'ko | Applicant |
| US5509419(A) | 1996-04-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US5522862(A) | 1996-06-01 | Testerman et al. | Applicant |
| US5531779(A) | 1996-07-01 | Dahl et al. | Applicant |
| US5540681(A) | 1996-07-01 | Strul et al. | Applicant |
| US5545161(A) | 1996-08-01 | Imran | Applicant |
| US5545193(A) | 1996-08-01 | Fleischman et al. | Applicant |
| US5547469(A) | 1996-08-01 | Rowland et al. | Applicant |
| US5549559(A) | 1996-08-01 | Eshel | Applicant |
| US5549655(A) | 1996-08-01 | Erickson | Applicant |
| US5549661(A) | 1996-08-01 | Kordis et al. | Applicant |
| USRE35330(E) | 1996-09-01 | Malone et al. | Applicant |
| US5558073(A) | 1996-09-01 | Pomeranz et al. | Applicant |
| US5562608(A) | 1996-10-01 | Sekins et al. | Examiner |
| US5571074(A) | 1996-11-01 | Buckman, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5571088(A) | 1996-11-01 | Lennox et al. | Applicant |
| US5574059(A) | 1996-11-01 | Regunathan et al. | Applicant |
| US5578072(A) | 1996-11-01 | Barone et al. | Applicant |
| US5582609(A) | 1996-12-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US5588432(A) | 1996-12-01 | Crowley | Applicant |
| US5588812(A) | 1996-12-01 | Taylor et al. | Applicant |
| US5595183(A) | 1997-01-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US5598848(A) | 1997-02-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US5599345(A) | 1997-02-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US5601088(A) | 1997-02-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US5605157(A) | 1997-02-01 | Panescu et al. | Applicant |
| US5607419(A) | 1997-03-01 | Amplatz et al. | Applicant |
| US5607462(A) | 1997-03-01 | Imran | Applicant |
| US5620438(A) | 1997-04-01 | Amplatz et al. | Applicant |
| US5623940(A) | 1997-04-01 | Daikuzono | Applicant |
| US5624439(A) | 1997-04-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US5626618(A) | 1997-05-01 | Ward et al. | Applicant |
| US5630425(A) | 1997-05-01 | Panescu et al. | Applicant |
| US5630794(A) | 1997-05-01 | Lax et al. | Applicant |
| US5634471(A) | 1997-06-01 | Fairfax et al. | Applicant |
| US5641326(A) | 1997-06-01 | Adams | Applicant |
| US5647870(A) | 1997-07-01 | Kordis et al. | Applicant |
| US5660175(A) | 1997-08-01 | Dayal | Applicant |
| US5678535(A) | 1997-10-01 | DiMarco | Applicant |
| US5680860(A) | 1997-10-01 | Imran | Applicant |
| US5681280(A) | 1997-10-01 | Rusk et al. | Applicant |
| US5681308(A) | 1997-10-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US5687723(A) | 1997-11-01 | Avitall | Applicant |
| US5688267(A) | 1997-11-01 | Panescu et al. | Applicant |
| US5693078(A) | 1997-12-01 | Desai et al. | Applicant |
| US5694934(A) | 1997-12-01 | Edelman | Examiner |
| US5695471(A) | 1997-12-01 | Wampler | Applicant |
| US5699799(A) | 1997-12-01 | Xu et al. | Applicant |
| US5702386(A) | 1997-12-01 | Stern et al. | Applicant |
| US5707218(A) | 1998-01-01 | Maher et al. | Applicant |
| US5707336(A) | 1998-01-01 | Rubin | Applicant |
| US5707352(A) | 1998-01-01 | Sekins et al. | Applicant |
| US5722401(A) | 1998-03-01 | Pietroski et al. | Applicant |
| US5722403(A) | 1998-03-01 | McGee et al. | Applicant |
| US5722416(A) | 1998-03-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US5725525(A) | 1998-03-01 | Kordis | Applicant |
| US5727569(A) | 1998-03-01 | Benetti et al. | Applicant |
| US5728094(A) | 1998-03-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US5730128(A) | 1998-03-01 | Pomeranz et al. | Applicant |
| US5730704(A) | 1998-03-01 | Avitall | Applicant |
| US5730726(A) | 1998-03-01 | Klingenstein | Applicant |
| US5730741(A) | 1998-03-01 | Horzewski et al. | Applicant |
| US5735846(A) | 1998-04-01 | Panescu et al. | Applicant |
| US5740808(A) | 1998-04-01 | Panescu et al. | Applicant |
| US5741248(A) | 1998-04-01 | Stern et al. | Applicant |
| US5752518(A) | 1998-05-01 | McGee et al. | Applicant |
| US5755714(A) | 1998-05-01 | Murphy-Chutorian | Applicant |
| US5755753(A) | 1998-05-01 | Knowlton | Applicant |
| US5759158(A) | 1998-06-01 | Swanson | Applicant |
| US5765568(A) | 1998-06-01 | Sweezer, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5769846(A) | 1998-06-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US5772590(A) | 1998-06-01 | Webster, Jr. | Applicant |
| US5779669(A) | 1998-07-01 | Haissaguerre et al. | Applicant |
| US5779698(A) | 1998-07-01 | Clayman et al. | Applicant |
| US5782239(A) | 1998-07-01 | Webster, Jr. | Applicant |
| US5782797(A) | 1998-07-01 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5782827(A) | 1998-07-01 | Gough et al. | Applicant |
| US5782848(A) | 1998-07-01 | Lennox | Applicant |
| US5782899(A) | 1998-07-01 | Imran | Applicant |
| US5792064(A) | 1998-08-01 | Panescu et al. | Applicant |
| US5795303(A) | 1998-08-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US5800375(A) | 1998-09-01 | Sweezer et al. | Applicant |
| US5807306(A) | 1998-09-01 | Shapland et al. | Applicant |
| US5810757(A) | 1998-09-01 | Sweezer, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5810807(A) | 1998-09-01 | Ganz et al. | Applicant |
| US5817028(A) | 1998-10-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US5817073(A) | 1998-10-01 | Krespi | Applicant |
| US5820554(A) | 1998-10-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US5823189(A) | 1998-10-01 | Kordis | Applicant |
| US5827277(A) | 1998-10-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US5833651(A) | 1998-11-01 | Donovan et al. | Applicant |
| US5836905(A) | 1998-11-01 | Lemelson et al. | Applicant |
| US5836947(A) | 1998-11-01 | Fleischman et al. | Applicant |
| US5837001(A) | 1998-11-01 | Mackey | Applicant |
| US5843075(A) | 1998-12-01 | Taylor | Applicant |
| US5843077(A) | 1998-12-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US5846238(A) | 1998-12-01 | Jackson et al. | Applicant |
| US5848969(A) | 1998-12-01 | Panescu et al. | Applicant |
| US5848972(A) | 1998-12-01 | Triedman et al. | Applicant |
| US5849026(A) | 1998-12-01 | Zhou et al. | Applicant |
| US5855577(A) | 1999-01-01 | Murphy-Chutorian et al. | Applicant |
| US5860974(A) | 1999-01-01 | Abele | Applicant |
| US5863291(A) | 1999-01-01 | Schaer | Applicant |
| US5865791(A) | 1999-02-01 | Whayne et al. | Applicant |
| US5868740(A) | 1999-02-01 | LeVeen et al. | Applicant |
| US5871443(A) | 1999-02-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US5871523(A) | 1999-02-01 | Fleischman et al. | Applicant |
| US5873852(A) | 1999-02-01 | Vigil et al. | Applicant |
| US5873865(A) | 1999-02-01 | Horzewski et al. | Applicant |
| US5876340(A) | 1999-03-01 | Tu et al. | Applicant |
| US5876399(A) | 1999-03-01 | Chia et al. | Applicant |
| US5881727(A) | 1999-03-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US5882346(A) | 1999-03-01 | Pomeranz et al. | Applicant |
| US5891135(A) | 1999-04-01 | Jackson et al. | Applicant |
| US5891136(A) | 1999-04-01 | McGee et al. | Applicant |
| US5891138(A) | 1999-04-01 | Tu et al. | Applicant |
| US5893847(A) | 1999-04-01 | Kordis | Applicant |
| US5897554(A) | 1999-04-01 | Chia et al. | Applicant |
| US5899882(A) | 1999-05-01 | Waksman et al. | Applicant |
| US5904651(A) | 1999-05-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US5904711(A) | 1999-05-01 | Flom et al. | Applicant |
| US5906636(A) | 1999-05-01 | Casscells, III et al. | Applicant |
| US5908445(A) | 1999-06-01 | Whayne et al. | Applicant |
| US5908446(A) | 1999-06-01 | Imran | Applicant |
| US5908839(A) | 1999-06-01 | Levitt et al. | Examiner |
| US5911218(A) | 1999-06-01 | DiMarco | Applicant |
| US5916235(A) | 1999-06-01 | Guglielmi | Applicant |
| US5919147(A) | 1999-07-01 | Jain | Applicant |
| US5919172(A) | 1999-07-01 | Golba, Jr. | Applicant |
| US5924424(A) | 1999-07-01 | Stevens et al. | Applicant |
| US5928228(A) | 1999-07-01 | Kordis et al. | Applicant |
| US5931835(A) | 1999-08-01 | Mackey | Applicant |
| US5935079(A) | 1999-08-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US5941869(A) | 1999-08-01 | Patterson et al. | Applicant |
| US5951494(A) | 1999-09-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US5951546(A) | 1999-09-01 | Lorentzen | Applicant |
| US5954661(A) | 1999-09-01 | Greenspon et al. | Applicant |
| US5954662(A) | 1999-09-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US5954717(A) | 1999-09-01 | Behl et al. | Applicant |
| US5957961(A) | 1999-09-01 | Maguire et al. | Applicant |
| US5964753(A) | 1999-10-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US5964796(A) | 1999-10-01 | Imran | Applicant |
| US5971983(A) | 1999-10-01 | Lesh | Applicant |
| US5972026(A) | 1999-10-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US5976175(A) | 1999-11-01 | Hirano et al. | Applicant |
| US5976709(A) | 1999-11-01 | Kageyama et al. | Applicant |
| US5979456(A) | 1999-11-01 | Magovern | Applicant |
| US5980563(A) | 1999-11-01 | Tu et al. | Applicant |
| US5984917(A) | 1999-11-01 | Fleischman et al. | Applicant |
| US5984971(A) | 1999-11-01 | Faccioli et al. | Applicant |
| US5991650(A) | 1999-11-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US5992419(A) | 1999-11-01 | Sterzer et al. | Applicant |
| US5993462(A) | 1999-11-01 | Pomeranz et al. | Applicant |
| US5997534(A) | 1999-12-01 | Tu et al. | Applicant |
| US5999855(A) | 1999-12-01 | DiMarco | Applicant |
| US6001054(A) | 1999-12-01 | Regulla et al. | Applicant |
| US6003517(A) | 1999-12-01 | Sheffield et al. | Applicant |
| US6004269(A) | 1999-12-01 | Crowley et al. | Applicant |
| US6006755(A) | 1999-12-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US6008211(A) | 1999-12-01 | Robinson et al. | Applicant |
| US6009877(A) | 2000-01-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US6010500(A) | 2000-01-01 | Sherman et al. | Applicant |
| US6014579(A) | 2000-01-01 | Pomeranz et al. | Applicant |
| US6016437(A) | 2000-01-01 | Tu et al. | Applicant |
| US6023638(A) | 2000-02-01 | Swanson | Applicant |
| US6024740(A) | 2000-02-01 | Lesh et al. | Applicant |
| US6029091(A) | 2000-02-01 | de la Rama et al. | Applicant |
| US6033397(A) | 2000-03-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US6036687(A) | 2000-03-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US6036689(A) | 2000-03-01 | Tu et al. | Applicant |
| US6039731(A) | 2000-03-01 | Taylor et al. | Applicant |
| US6045549(A) | 2000-04-01 | Smethers et al. | Applicant |
| US6045550(A) | 2000-04-01 | Simpson et al. | Applicant |
| US6050992(A) | 2000-04-01 | Nichols | Applicant |
| US6053172(A) | 2000-04-01 | Hovda et al. | Applicant |
| US6053909(A) | 2000-04-01 | Shadduck | Applicant |
| US6056744(A) | 2000-05-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US6056769(A) | 2000-05-01 | Epstein et al. | Applicant |
| US6063078(A) | 2000-05-01 | Wittkampf | Applicant |
| US6071280(A) | 2000-06-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US6071281(A) | 2000-06-01 | Burnside et al. | Applicant |
| US6071282(A) | 2000-06-01 | Fleischman | Applicant |
| US6083255(A) | 2000-07-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US6090104(A) | 2000-07-01 | Webster, Jr. | Applicant |
| US6092528(A) | 2000-07-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US6102886(A) | 2000-08-01 | Lundquist et al. | Applicant |
| US6106524(A) | 2000-08-01 | Eggers et al. | Applicant |
| US6123702(A) | 2000-09-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US6123703(A) | 2000-09-01 | Tu et al. | Applicant |
| US6139527(A) | 2000-10-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US6139571(A) | 2000-10-01 | Fuller et al. | Applicant |
| US6142993(A) | 2000-11-01 | Whayne et al. | Applicant |
| US6143013(A) | 2000-11-01 | Samson et al. | Applicant |
| US6149647(A) | 2000-11-01 | Tu et al. | Applicant |
| US6152143(A) | 2000-11-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US6152899(A) | 2000-11-01 | Farley et al. | Applicant |
| US6159194(A) | 2000-12-01 | Eggers et al. | Applicant |
| US6179833(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Taylor | Applicant |
| US6183468(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US6198970(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Freed et al. | Applicant |
| US6200311(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US6200332(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Del Giglio | Applicant |
| US6200333(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Laufer | Applicant |
| US6210367(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Carr | Applicant |
| US6212433(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Behl | Applicant |
| US6214002(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Fleischman et al. | Applicant |
| US6216043(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US6216044(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Kordis | Applicant |
| US6217576(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Tu et al. | Applicant |
| US6235024(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Tu | Applicant |
| US6241727(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Tu et al. | Applicant |
| US6245065(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Panescu et al. | Applicant |
| US6254598(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US6258087(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US6264653(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Falwell | Applicant |
| US6269813(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Fitzgerald et al. | Applicant |
| US6270476(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Santoianni et al. | Applicant |
| US6273907(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Laufer | Applicant |
| US6283988(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US6283989(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US6287304(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Eggers et al. | Applicant |
| US6296639(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Truckai et al. | Applicant |
| US6299633(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Laufer | Applicant |
| US6322559(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Daulton et al. | Applicant |
| US6322584(B2) | 2001-11-01 | Ingle et al. | Applicant |
| US6338727(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Noda et al. | Applicant |
| US6338836(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Kuth et al. | Applicant |
| US6346104(B2) | 2002-02-01 | Daly et al. | Applicant |
| US6355031(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US6379352(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Reynolds et al. | Applicant |
| US6409723(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US6411852(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US6416511(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Lesh et al. | Applicant |
| US6416740(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Unger | Applicant |
| US6423105(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Iijima et al. | Applicant |
| US6425895(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US6440129(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Simpson | Applicant |
| US6442435(B2) | 2002-08-01 | King et al. | Applicant |
| US6458121(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Rosenstock et al. | Applicant |
| US6460545(B2) | 2002-10-01 | Kordis | Applicant |
| US6488673(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US6488679(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US6493589(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Medhkour et al. | Applicant |
| US6494880(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US6496738(B2) | 2002-12-01 | Carr | Applicant |
| US6514246(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US6526320(B2) | 2003-02-01 | Mitchell | Applicant |
| US6529756(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Phan et al. | Applicant |
| US6544226(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Gaiser et al. | Applicant |
| US6544262(B2) | 2003-04-01 | Fleischman | Applicant |
| US6547788(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Maguire et al. | Applicant |
| US6558378(B2) | 2003-05-01 | Sherman et al. | Applicant |
| US6572612(B2) | 2003-06-01 | Stewart et al. | Applicant |
| US6575623(B2) | 2003-06-01 | Werneth | Applicant |
| US6575969(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Rittman, III et al. | Applicant |
| US6582427(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Goble et al. | Applicant |
| US6582430(B2) | 2003-06-01 | Hall | Applicant |
| US6589235(B2) | 2003-07-01 | Wong et al. | Applicant |
| US6610054(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US6620159(B2) | 2003-09-01 | Hegde | Applicant |
| US6626903(B2) | 2003-09-01 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US6634363(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Danek et al. | Examiner |
| US6635056(B2) | 2003-10-01 | Kadhiresan et al. | Applicant |
| US6638273(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Farley et al. | Applicant |
| US6640120(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US6645200(B1) | 2003-11-01 | Koblish et al. | Applicant |
| US6652548(B2) | 2003-11-01 | Evans et al. | Applicant |
| US6669693(B2) | 2003-12-01 | Friedman | Applicant |
| US6673068(B1) | 2004-01-01 | Berube | Applicant |
| US6692492(B2) | 2004-02-01 | Simpson et al. | Applicant |
| US6699243(B2) | 2004-03-01 | West et al. | Applicant |
| US6714822(B2) | 2004-03-01 | King et al. | Applicant |
| US6723091(B2) | 2004-04-01 | Goble et al. | Applicant |
| US6743197(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Edwards | Applicant |
| US6749604(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Eggers et al. | Applicant |
| US6749606(B2) | 2004-06-01 | Keast et al. | Applicant |
| US6767347(B2) | 2004-07-01 | Sharkey et al. | Applicant |
| US6770070(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Balbierz | Applicant |
| US6802843(B2) | 2004-10-01 | Truckai et al. | Applicant |
| US6805131(B2) | 2004-10-01 | Kordis | Applicant |
| US6837888(B2) | 2005-01-01 | Ciarrocca et al. | Applicant |
| US6840243(B2) | 2005-01-01 | Deem et al. | Applicant |
| US6849073(B2) | 2005-02-01 | Hoey et al. | Applicant |
| US6852091(B2) | 2005-02-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US6852110(B2) | 2005-02-01 | Roy et al. | Applicant |
| US6866662(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Fuimaono et al. | Applicant |
| US6881213(B2) | 2005-04-01 | Ryan et al. | Applicant |
| US6893436(B2) | 2005-05-01 | Woodard et al. | Applicant |
| US6893439(B2) | 2005-05-01 | Fleischman | Applicant |
| US6895267(B2) | 2005-05-01 | Panescu et al. | Applicant |
| US6904303(B2) | 2005-06-01 | Phan et al. | Applicant |
| US6917834(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Koblish et al. | Applicant |
| US6939346(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Kannenberg et al. | Applicant |
| US6954977(B2) | 2005-10-01 | Maguire et al. | Applicant |
| US7027869(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US7043307(B1) | 2006-05-01 | Zelickson et al. | Applicant |
| US7104987(B2) | 2006-09-01 | Biggs et al. | Applicant |
| US7104990(B2) | 2006-09-01 | Jenkins et al. | Applicant |
| US7118568(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Hassett et al. | Applicant |
| US7122033(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Wood | Applicant |
| US7131445(B2) | 2006-11-01 | Amoah | Applicant |
| US7186251(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Malecki et al. | Applicant |
| US7198635(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US7200445(B1) | 2007-04-01 | Dalbec et al. | Applicant |
| US7241295(B2) | 2007-07-01 | Maguire | Applicant |
| US7255693(B1) | 2007-08-01 | Johnston et al. | Applicant |
| US7266414(B2) | 2007-09-01 | Cornelius et al. | Applicant |
| US7273055(B2) | 2007-09-01 | Danek et al. | Examiner |
| US7542802(B2) | 2009-06-01 | Biggs et al. | Applicant |
| US7556624(B2) | 2009-07-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US7740017(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0006410(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Lukacs et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0091379(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0050631(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Mody et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0055331(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Kotmel et al. | Examiner |
| US2003/0065371(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Satake | Applicant |
| US2003/0069570(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Witzel et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0159700(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0187430(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Vorisek | Applicant |
| US2003/0236455(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Swanson et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0031494(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0153056(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Muller et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0182399(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0249401(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Rabiner et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0010270(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Laufer | Applicant |
| US2005/0096644(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Hall et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0171396(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Pankratov et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0193279(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Daners | Applicant |
| US2005/0203503(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0240176(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Oral et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0251128(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Amoah | Applicant |
| US2006/0062808(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0079887(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Buysse et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0089637(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Werneth et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0135953(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Kania et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0137698(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0247617(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0247618(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Kaplan et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0247619(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Kaplan et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0247726(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Biggs et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0247727(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Biggs et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0247746(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0254600(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0278243(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0278244(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0282071(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Utley et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0074719(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0083194(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Kunis et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0083197(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0100390(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Danaek et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0106292(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Kaplan et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0106296(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0106348(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Laufer | Applicant |
| US2007/0118184(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0118190(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0123958(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Laufer | Applicant |
| US2007/0123961(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0129720(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Demarais et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0179087(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Gelfand et al. | Examiner |
| US2008/0004596(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Yun et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0097424(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Wizeman et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0255642(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Zarins et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0018538(A1) | 2009-01-01 | Webster et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0030477(A1) | 2009-01-01 | Jarrard | Applicant |
| US2009/0043301(A1) | 2009-02-01 | Jarrard et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0069797(A1) | 2009-03-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0112203(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0143705(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0143776(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Danek et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0192505(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Askew et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0192508(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Laufer et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0306644(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Mayse et al. | Applicant |
| DE19529634(A1) | 1997-02-01 | Applicant | |
| EP189329(A3) | 1987-06-01 | Applicant | |
| EP286145(A2) | 1988-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP280225(A3) | 1989-03-01 | Applicant | |
| EP286145(A3) | 1990-10-01 | Applicant | |
| EP282225(B1) | 1992-06-01 | Applicant | |
| EP908713(A1) | 1999-04-01 | Applicant | |
| EP908150(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Applicant | |
| EP768091(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1297795(B1) | 2005-08-01 | Applicant | |
| FR2659240(B1) | 1997-07-01 | Applicant | |
| GB2233293(A) | 1991-01-01 | Applicant | |
| GB2233293 | 1994-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP59167707(A2) | 1984-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JP7289557(A2) | 1995-11-01 | Applicant | |
| JP9047518(A2) | 1997-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JP9243837(A2) | 1997-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JP10026709(A2) | 1998-01-01 | Applicant | |
| RU2053814(C1) | 1996-02-01 | Applicant | |
| RU2091054(C1) | 1997-09-01 | Applicant | |
| SU545358(T) | 1977-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-8911311(A1) | 1989-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9502370(A3) | 1995-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9510322(A1) | 1995-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9604860(A1) | 1996-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9610961(A1) | 1996-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9732532(A1) | 1997-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9733715(A1) | 1997-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9737715(A1) | 1997-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9740751(A1) | 1997-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9844854(A1) | 1998-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9852480(A1) | 1998-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9856234(A1) | 1998-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9856324(A1) | 1998-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9903413(A1) | 1999-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9858681(A3) | 1999-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9913779(A2) | 1999-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9932040(A1) | 1999-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9934741(A1) | 1999-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9944506(A1) | 1999-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9945855(A1) | 1999-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-9964109(A1) | 1999-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-0051510(A1) | 2000-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-0062699(A3) | 2000-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-0103642(A1) | 2001-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-0232333(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-0232334(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2009082433(A2) | 2009-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2009137819(A1) | 2009-11-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (68)
- Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 09/244,173.Applicant
- Co-pending U.S. Appl, No. 09/436,455.Applicant
- Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 09/095,323.Applicant
- Simon R. Johnson et al., Synthetic Functions of Airway Smooth Muscle in Asthma, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., Aug. 1997, 18(8), 288-292.Applicant
- Macklem P.T., Mechanical Factors Determining Maximum Bronchoconstriction, European Respiratory Journal, Jun. 1989, 6, 516s-519s.Applicant
- James C. Hogg, The Pathology of Asthma, APMIS, Oct. 1997, 105(10), 735-745.Applicant
- Dierkesmann et al., Indication and Results of Endobronchial Laser Therapy, Lung, 1990, 168, 1095-1102.Applicant
- Netter F.H., Respiratory System: A Compilation of Paintings Depicting Anatomy and Embryology, Physiology, Pathology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Features and Treatment of Diseases, In The CIBA Collection of Medical Illustrations M.B. Divertie, ed., Summit: New Jerse, 1979, vol. 7, 119-135.Applicant
- Provotorov et al., The Clinical Efficacy of Treating Patients with Nonspecific Lung Disease by Using Low-energy Laser Irradiation and Intrapulmonary Drug Administration, ISSN: 0040-3660., Terapevticheskii Arkhiv (USSR), 1991, 63 (12), 18-23.Applicant
- Vorotnev et al., Low energy laser treatment of chronic obstructive bronchitis in a general rehabilitation center, ISSN: 0040-3660., Terapevticheskii Arkhiv, 1997, 69 (3), 17-19.Applicant
- Wiggs B.R. et al., On the Mechanism of Mucosal Folding in Normal and Asthmatic Airways, J. Appl. Physiol., Dec. 1997, 83(6), 1814-1821.Applicant
- Ivaniuta O. M. et al., Effect of Low-Power Laser Irradiation of Bronchial Mucosa on the State of Systemic and Local Immunity in Patients With Chronic Bronchitis, Problemy Tuberkuleza, 1991, 6, 26-29.Applicant
- An, S.S et al., Airway smooth muscle dynamics: a common pathway of airway obstruction in asthma, European Respiratory Journal, 2007, vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 834-860.Applicant
- Bel, E. H., Hot Stuff: Bronchial Thermoplasty for Asthma, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2006, vol. 173, pp. 941-942.Applicant
- Brown, R. H. et al., In vivo evaluation of the effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty with computed tomography, Journal of Applied Physiology, 2005, vol. 98, pp. 1603-1606.Applicant
- Brown, R. H. et al., Effect of bronchial thermoplasty on airway distensibility, European Respiratory Journal, vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 277-282.Applicant
- Chhajed, P., Will There be a Role for Bronchoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation?, 2005, J Bronchiol, vol. 12, No. 3, p. 184.Applicant
- Cox, G., et al., Early Clinical Experience With Bronchial Thermoplasty for the Treatment of Asthma, 2002, p. 1068.Applicant
- Cox, G. et al., Asthma Control During the Year After Bronchial Thermoplasty, The New England Journal of Medicine, Mar. 29, 2007, vol. 356, No. 13, pp. 1327-1337.Applicant
- Cox, G. et al., Bronchial Thermoplasty: One-Year Update, American Thoracic Society Annual Meeting, 2004, p. 1.Applicant
- Cox, G., et al., Development of a Novel Bronchoscopic Therapy for Asthma, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2003, p. 1.Applicant
- Cox, G., et al., Bronchial Thermoplasty for Asthma, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2006, vol. 173, pp. 965-969.Applicant
- Cox, G., et al., Bronchial Thermoplasty: Long-Term Follow-up and Patient Satisfaction, 2004, p. 1.Applicant
- Cox, G., et al., Radiofrequency ablation of airway smooth muscle for sustained treatment of asthma: preliminary investigations, European Respiratory Journal, 2004, 24, pp. 659-663.Applicant
- Cox, G., et al., Clinical Experience with Bronchial Thermoplasty for the Treatment of Asthma, 2003, Chest 124, p. 106S.Applicant
- Cox, G., et al., Impact of bronchial thermoplasty on asthma status: interim results from the AIR trial, 2006. European Respiratory Society Annual Meeting, Munich, Germany, p. 1.Applicant
- Danek, C. J., et al., Bronchial thermoplasty reduces canine airway responsiveness to local methacholine challenge, 2002, American Thoracic Society Annual Meeting, p. 1.Applicant
- Danek, C. J., et al., Asthma Intervention Research (AIR) Trial Evaluating Bronchial Thermoplasty™: Early Results, 2002. American Thoracic Society Annual Meeting, p. 1.Applicant
- Danek, C. J., et al., Reduction in airway hyperresponsiveness to methacoline by the application of RF energy in dogs, J Appl Physiol, 2004, vol. 97, pp. 1946-1953.Applicant
- Solway, J. at al., Airway Smooth Muscle as a Traget for Asthma Therapy, The New England Journal of Medicine, Mar. 29, 2007, 356(13), pp. 1367-1369.Applicant
- Laviolette, et al., Asthma Intervention Research (AIR) Trial: Early Safety Assessment of Bronchial Thermoplasty, 2004, p. 1.Applicant
- Leff, et al., Bronchial Thermoplasty Alters Airway Smooth Muscle and Reduces Responsiveness in Responsiveness in Dogs: A Possible Procedure for the Treatment of Asthma, American Thoracic Society Annual Meeting, 2002, p. 1.Applicant
- Lim, E. C. et al., Botulinum Toxin: A Novel Therapeutic Option for Bronchial Asthma?, Medical Hypotheses, 2006, vol. 66, pp. 915-919.Applicant
- Lombard, et al., Histologic Effects of Bronchial Thermoplasty of Canine and Human Airways, American Thoracic Society Annual Meeting, 2002, p. 1.Applicant
- Mayse, M. et al., Clinical Pearls for Bronchial Thermoplasty, J Bronchol, Apr. 2007, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 115-123.Applicant
- Miller, J. D. et al., A Prospective Feasibility Study of Bronchial Thermoplasty in the Human Airway, 2005, vol. 127, No. 6, pp. 1999-2006.Applicant
- Miller, J. D. et al., Bronchial Thermoplasty is Well Tolerated by Non-Asthmatic Patients Requiring Lobectomy, 2002, American Thoracic Society Annual Meeting, p. 1.Applicant
- Rubin, et al. Bronchial Thermoplasty Improves Asthma Status of Moderate to Severe Persistent Asthmatics Over and Above Current Standard-of-Care, 2006, American College of Chest Physicians, 2 pages.Applicant
- Wilson, S. R. et al., Global assessment after bronchial thermoplasty: the patient's perspective, Journal of Outcomes Research, 2006, vol. 10, pp. 37-46.Applicant
- Sterk, P. J., Heterogeneity of Airway Hyperresponsiveness: Time for Unconventional, but Traditional Studies, 2004, The American Pshychological Society, pp. 2017-2018.Applicant
- Toma, T. P., Brave New World for Interventional Bronchoscopy, 2005, Thorax, vol. 60, pp. 180-181.Applicant
- Trow, T., Clinical Year in Review I, proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 553-556.Applicant
- Wizeman, et al., A Computer Model of Thermal Treatment of Airways by Radiofrequency (RF) Energy Delivery, 2007, American Thoracic Society Annual Meeting, p. 1.Applicant
- Vasilotta, P. L. et al., “I-R Laser: A New Therapy in Rhino-Sino-Nasal Bronchial Syndrome with Asthmatic Component,” American Society for Laser medicine and Surgery abstracts, date unknown, p. 74.Applicant
- Shesterina, M. V. et al., Effect of laser therapy on immunity in patients with bronchial asthma and pulmonary tuberculosis, 1993, pp. 23-26.Applicant
- Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,644, filed Dec. 17, 2009, Inventor Jerry Jarrard.Applicant
- Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,156, filed Mar. 18, 2010, Inventor Danek et al.Applicant
- Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,704, filed Apr. 22, 2010 Inventor Danek et al.Applicant
- Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, 2002, 192 Pages Total.Applicant
- James, et al., “The Mechanics of Airway Narrowing in Asthma,” Am. Rev. Respir. Dis., 1989, 139, 242-246.Applicant
- Janssen L. J., “Asthma therapy: how far have we come, why did we fail and where should we go next?,” Eur Respir J, 2009, 33, pp. 11-20.Applicant
- Kitamura S., “Color Atlas of Clinical Application of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy,” 1990, Year Book Medical Publishers, 17.Applicant
- Kraft M., “The distal airways: are they Important in asthma?,” European Respiratory, 1999, 1403-1417.Applicant
- Notice of final Rejection, Japanese Patent Application No. 2000-553172, dated Sep. 2, 2008, 5 pages.Applicant
- PCT International search report for application No. PCT/US00/05412 mailed on Jun. 20, 2000, 2 pages.Applicant
- PCT International search report for application No. PCT/US00/18197 mailed on Oct. 3, 2000, 1 page.Applicant
- PCT International search report for application No. PCT/US00/28745 mailed on Mar. 28, 2001, 6 pages.Applicant
- PCT International search report for application No. PCT/US01/32321 mailed on Jan. 18, 2002, 2 pages.Applicant
- PCT International search report for application No. PCT/US98/03759 mailed on Jul. 30, 1998, 1 page.Applicant
- PCT International search report for application No. PCT/US98/26227 mailed on Mar. 25, 1999, 1 page.Applicant
- PCT International search report for application No. PCT/US99/00232 mailed on Mar. 4, 1999, 1 page.Applicant
- PCT International search report for application No. PCT/US99/12986 mailed on Sep. 29, 1999, 1 page.Applicant
- Peter K. Jeffery, “Remodeling in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2001, 164 (10), 13516.Applicant
- Seow C. Y., et al., “Signal Transduction in Smooth Muscle Historical perspective on airway smooth muscle: the saga of a frustrated cell,” J Appl Physiol, 2001, 91, 938-952.Applicant
- Stephanie A.Shore, “Airway Smooth Muscle in Asthma—Not Just More of the Same,” N Engl J Med, 2004, 351 (6), 531-532.Applicant
- UNSW Embryo-Respiratory System [online], Embryology, 2007, [retrieved on Dec. 10, 2007]. Retrieved from the internet: (URL:http://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/Refer/respire/sclect.htm).Applicant
- Wayne Mitzner, “Airway Smooth Muscle the appendix of the Lung,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2004, 169, 787-790.Applicant
- Wayne Mitznerl, “Bronchial Thermoplasty in Asthma,” Allergology International, 2006, 55, 225-234.Applicant