US 7,765,151 B1Grant
Computerized systems and methods for facilitating the flow of capital through the housing finance industry
Issue Date:2010-07-27
•25 Claims
•40 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A computer implemented data processing system comprises a pricing engine and user interface program logic. The pricing engine is configured to calculate a price for an individual mortgage loan for a sale of the individual mortgage loan from a loan originator to a secondary mortgage market purchaser. The price is calculated prior to closing of the mortgage loan based on mortgage loan application data for a borrower associated with the mortgage loan. The user interface logic is configured to generate one or more screen displays configured to present the price to the loan originator prior to closing of the loan. The one or more screen displays are also configured to receive a commitment from the loan originator for the sale of the individual mortgage loan to the secondary mortgage market purchaser.
Metadata
Assignee
- Fannie Mae
Inventors
- Michael J. Williams
- Peter G. Kopperman
- David N. Voth
- Richard N. Plotnick
- Peter A. Simon
- Kimberly J. Thurow
- Michael W. Koch
- Martin T. Schulz
Application Information
Application Number:US 11/490,614
Filing Date:2006-07-21
Priority Date:2000-06-13
Art Unit:3695
Classifications
IPC:
G06Q99/00
Patent Drawings (40 sheets)
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/743,484, filed Dec. 22, 2003, which is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 10/331,680, filed Dec. 30, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,988,082, which is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 09/593,106, filed Jun. 13, 2000, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, and all of which are entitled “Computerized Systems and Method for Facilitating the Flow of Capital Through the Housing Finance Industry.”
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates generally to computerized systems and methods for facilitating the flow of capital through the housing finance industry. More particularly, the present invention relates, to computerized systems and methods that may be used in connection with one or more of mortgage qualification, application, approval, underwriting and pricing.
[0003] When considering the purchase or refinance of a home, potential home buyers consult mortgage lenders such as mortgage companies, savings and loans institutions, credit unions, state and local housing finance agencies or the like to obtain the funds necessary to purchase or refinance their homes. These lenders, who make (originate and fund) mortgage loans directly to home buyers, comprise the “primary mortgage market.”
[0004] When a mortgage is made in the primary mortgage market, the lender has several options which include: (i) holding the loan as an investment in its portfolio; (ii) selling the loan to investors in the “secondary mortgage market” (which includes financial institutions, pension funds, insurance companies, securities dealers, and various other investors) to replenish its supply of funds; or (iii) packaging the loan with other loans and exchanging them for securities like mortgage backed securities which provide lenders with a liquid asset to hold or sell to the secondary market. By choosing to sell its mortgage loans to the secondary mortgage market, or by selling the mortgage backed securities, lenders get a new supply of funds to make more home mortgage loans, thereby assuring home buyers a continual supply of mortgage credit.
[0005] A secondary mortgage market purchaser finances the loans and mortgage backed securities it buys for its own mortgage portfolio by the sale of debt securities in the global capital markets. Working with investment banks, the purchaser sells its debt to both domestic and international investors such as central banks, pension funds, investment funds, commercial banks, and insurance companies.
[0006] In the housing finance industry, a need exists for new systems and methods to make the process of buying a home quicker, easier and less costly. Particularly, a need in the industry exists for a loan platform that would (i) enable non-traditional players to originate loans without having to build the requisite infrastructure, (ii) streamline the loan process to provide a positive consumer experience, (iii) lower the cost of the loan origination process and reduce the costs and uncertainty associated with managing credit risk, and (iv) create a competitive pricing structure where specific components of the costs and fees associated with the loan may, at the borrower's option, be aggregated or “bundled” with the loan principal.
[0007] Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a system and process which provide a potential borrower with (i) a meaningful and readily understandable, real time, anonymous assessment of the likelihood of being approved for a loan based on limited information provided by the potential borrower without the need to obtain a credit report or a collateral appraisal, (ii) an online, real time, firm underwriting decision on each loan product offered by the lender for which the borrower is eligible, regardless of whether or not the borrower has identified actual collateral (e.g., real property) for the loan, (iii) the opportunity to aggregate closing costs with the loan principal, (iv) an interest rate and points specific to the potential borrower based on the credit risk to the lender and secondary mortgage market purchaser posed by the borrower in connection with the loan products for which the borrower is eligible, (v) reduced loan fees and costs resulting from requiring only limited appraisal field work or no appraisal field work (or the waiver of certain processing steps based on the purpose of the transaction and the loan product types requested), as appropriate, and (vi) reduced documentation verification requirements. It is also desirable to provide systems and processes that minimize the uncertainty faced by the loan originator when dealing with the secondary mortgage market by providing the loan originator with the acquisition price it may expect to receive for an individual loan (not an aggregate of loans) in the secondary market from the secondary mortgage market purchaser. It is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] In accordance with an embodiment, a computer implemented data processing system comprises a pricing engine and user interface program logic. The pricing engine is configured to calculate a price for an individual mortgage loan for a sale of the individual mortgage loan from a loan originator to a secondary mortgage market purchaser. The pricing engine is further configured to calculate the price prior to closing of the mortgage loan based on mortgage loan application data for a borrower associated with the mortgage loan. The user interface logic is configured to generate screen displays for presentation to an operator using a global communication network and to receive operator inputs from the operator using the global communication network responsive to the screen displays. The screen displays include one or more screen displays configured to present the price to the loan originator. The user interface logic is configured to present the one or more screens with the price to the loan originator prior to closing of the loan. The one or more screen displays are also configured to receive a commitment from the loan originator for the sale of the individual mortgage loan to the secondary mortgage market purchaser.
[0009] In accordance with another embodiment, a computer-assisted mortgage funding method comprises generating a price for a sale of a mortgage loan to a secondary mortgage market purchaser, presenting the price to a loan originator of the mortgage loan, receiving an indication that the loan originator has closed the mortgage loan, and purchasing the mortgage loan from the loan originator at the price generated prior to closing of the mortgage loan. The price is for the mortgage loan individually and not as part of an aggregation of loans. The price is generated by a computer-implemented pricing engine. The pricing engine is configured to generate the price prior to closing of the mortgage loan based on mortgage loan application data for a borrower associated with the mortgage loan. The price is presented by way of a web page presented to the loan originator using a global communication network. The indication that the loan originator has closed the mortgage loan is received after the price is presented to the loan originator.
[0010] It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the present invention, are given by way of illustration and not limitation. Many modifications and changes within the scope of the present invention may be made without departing from the spirit thereof, and the invention includes all such modification.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] For a fuller understanding, reference is had to the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0012] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the system constructed and arranged according to an exemplary embodiment;
[0013] FIG. 2 a is a high-level flow chart depicting the process flow according to an exemplary embodiment;
[0014] FIGS. 2 b-2u depict exemplary computer display screens illustrating the process flow depicted in FIG. 2 a;
[0015] FIG. 3 is a flow chart depicting the probable qualification calculation process according to an exemplary embodiment;
[0016] FIGS. 4-13 depict exemplary computer display screens used in connection with the probable qualification calculation process according to an exemplary embodiment;
[0017] FIGS. 14 a-14c are flow charts depicting the process interaction of the underwriting engine and the pricing engine according to an exemplary embodiment;
[0018] FIG. 15 is a flow chart depicting the risk-based pricing process according to an exemplary embodiment;
[0019] FIG. 16 is a flow chart depicting the process steps of calculating the customer risk-based price component in connection with the pricing process according to an exemplary embodiment;
[0020] FIG. 17 is a flow chart depicting the process steps of retrieving the risk-based guaranty fee in connection with the pricing process according to an exemplary embodiment; and
[0021] FIGS. 18 a-18b are flow charts depicting the process steps of generating a spot price according to an exemplary embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0022] System and processes are disclosed that provide potential borrowers with the means to first ascertain the likelihood that they will be eligible for a loan (e.g., a mortgage loan) in real time over a global computer network, such as, for example, the Internet, and to apply for, and perhaps obtain, a loan online. Although discussed herein in the context of mortgage loans, it should be understood that the systems and methods are not limited to mortgage loans, but have application with respect to other types of loans.
[0023] FIG. 1 depicts a simplified schematic illustration of a system, generally indicated at 10, which includes the component elements and means necessary to effect and control the various process steps as described hereinafter. Desirably, and where appropriate, system 10 utilizes existing computer capabilities, both hardware and software, and electronic communications links, for example, to display loan information to a potential borrower and to receive and process, in real time, data input by the potential borrower.
[0024] System 10 includes a computer server 12 which includes a processor 14. Server 12 has electronic access to a database 16 containing control files 18 also known as look up tables. Server 12 operates under the control of computer software to carry out the steps described in greater detail hereinafter. The computer software includes a probable qualification calculator 20, a pricing engine 22, an underwriting engine 24, and a collateral assessment module 26 within the underwriting engine, each a set of software objects and/or program elements collectively having the ability to execute independently in a separate thread or logical chain of process execution, while permitting the flow of data inputs therebetween. Calculator 20, engines 22 and 24, and module 26 can each be executed as a separate logical server or using a separate physical device. However, for lenders and potential borrowers, server 12 preferably operates as a single logical server.
[0025] Server 12 is electronically coupled to a remote server 28 on the lender side. Server 28 is coupled to a user interface 30 including conventional input and display devices 32 and 34, respectively. Interface 30 is preferably a remote interface coupled to server 28 via a publicly accessible global computer network. A common example of such a network is the Internet.
[0026] Users of system 10 include potential borrowers (e.g., home buyers), loan originators, which may be mortgage companies, savings and loans or other lending institutions. Desirably, the loan originators also include prospects in the mortgage lending business.
[0027] On a conceptual level, system 10 performs three functions: (i) identifying available loan products to potential borrowers, (ii) evaluating the loan application, and (iii) facilitating the sale of the mortgage loan to the secondary mortgage market purchaser. As described in greater detail hereinafter, the loan product identification function involves (a) calculating sample interest rates for presentation to potential borrowers to entice them to use system 10, as well as, (b) assessing a potential borrower's likelihood of being approved for a loan. The loan application evaluation function of system 10 involves underwriting and pricing the loan based on the potential borrower's specific financial profile and other relevant characteristics. The function of committing or selling the individual loan in the secondary mortgage market involves the determination of a spot price for presentation to the loan originator.
[0028] Although functionally distinct, it should be understood that the foregoing three functions preferably overlap when it comes to the flow of data inputs through system 10 in order to avoid requiring the borrower to enter the same core data more than once. For example, information input by the potential borrower and used by probable qualification calculator 20 as described in greater detail hereinafter can be used to populate the loan application and can be used by underwriting engine 24, pricing engine 22, and collateral assessment module 26 to effect their respective functions within system 10.
[0029] Referring now to FIG. 2 a, the prospect or other loan originator preferably displays generic interest rates (together with an assumptive rate sheet, i.e., current mortgage rates) on its Internet web site or the like to entice online mortgage shoppers to access the web site (step 50). The generic interest rates (“enticement rates”) displayed are not intended to be borrower specific, but are calculated by pricing engine 22 and provided to the loan originator as representative, for example, of interest rates that a “typical” borrower may expect to receive, or rates that a fictitious highly qualified borrower may expect to receive, as described in greater detail hereinafter. FIG. 2 b depicts an example of a computer Internet interface screen displaying enticement rates.
[0030] Once enticed into accessing the loan originator's web site (step 52), the potential borrower is given the option of proceeding immediately with an online loan application or first determining his/her likelihood of being approved for a loan (decision 54). If the borrower opts to first ascertain the likelihood of being approved for a loan, system 10 preferably provides the potential borrower with an exploratory, self-assessment tool driven by probable qualification calculator software 20, as discussed in greater detail hereinafter.
[0031] Unlike conventional Internet mortgage web sites which offer housing affordability calculators, system 10 through its probable qualification calculator software 20 is designed to provide the potential borrower with an anonymous, risk-free and cost-free assessment of the percentage likelihood of approval for a mortgage loan (step 56). This is not a mere affordability calculation such as is common in conventional mortgage web sites. It should be understood, however, that probable qualification calculator 20 can be provided in tandem with a conventional affordability calculator.
[0032] Generally speaking, from the perspective of a potential borrower, there are distinct benefits associated with having probable qualification calculator 20 available for self-assessment purposes prior to undergoing a full online loan approval process. As discussed in greater detail hereinafter, calculator 20 can be utilized anonymously, because personal information about the borrower is not collected and a credit report from a credit reporting agency is not required to estimate the probability of mortgage loan approval. Also, the potential borrower can use calculator 20 without a specific property to evaluate. Furthermore, calculator 20 permits the borrower to compare the probability of approval for different loan “scenarios” by iteratively selecting different combinations of down payment, sales price, liquid assets, income, loan purpose, and mortgage product. Calculator 20 can be used without cost to the potential borrower since neither a credit report nor an appraisal is required for the estimation of an approval probability; rather, the borrower need only provide responses to a short online questionnaire which is designed to take only minutes to complete.
[0033] Once the potential borrower has ascertained the likelihood of being approved for a loan, the borrower may elect to terminate his/her online loan session or to proceed with an online loan application (decision 58). If the potential borrower does not wish to proceed with a loan application, the session ends (event 59).
[0034] If the potential borrower decides to proceed with a loan application (either at decision 54 or decision 58), system 10 captures the loan purpose (i.e., purchase or refinance) and other requested information input by the potential borrower including the borrower's and each co-borrower's name and social security number, address, employment, income, assets and current loans (step 60). In a preferred embodiment of the system and process, up to four (4) co-borrowers may be included on the loan application.
[0035] System 10 also assigns a unique identifier or casefile ID for the lender and loan application and requests authorization to obtain a credit report on the borrower. FIGS. 2 c through 2o, depict examples of Internet display screens used to capture requisite information for the loan application process for both purchase and refinance loans, and to permit the potential borrower the opportunity to verify such information.
[0036] It should be understood that certain of the information for the loan application may be captured automatically from information already entered by the potential borrower in connection with the probable qualification process. This avoids the burden of having the potential borrower enter the same data more than once.
[0037] Preferably, system 10 automatically verifies information entered by the potential borrower concerning the address of the real property that is intended to underlie the loan being applied for (“address scrubbing”). As discussed in greater detail hereinafter, the verified address is preferably used to retrieve the statistical predicted value for available loans which is fed to collateral assessment module 26 during the underwriting process and is used to determine the requisite level of appraisal field work (i.e., waived, exterior-only inspection, or interior and exterior inspection). Also, system 10 preferably obtains the county in which the property is located as well as Metropolitan Statistical Area information for the address (“geocoding”). This information may be used to extract Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) median income information to help determine if the borrower could be eligible for alternative loan products. It should be understood that, by performing the address scrubbing and geocoding prior to the underwriting process described below, the actual underwriting and pricing of the loan will process faster.
[0038] With the permission of the potential borrower received, system 10 obtains a credit report on the borrower (step 62). Preferably, as discussed in greater detail hereinafter, the borrower's real estate tradelines (e.g., outstanding mortgages, home equity loans) are extracted from the credit report and provided to the loan originator. They are also displayed to the potential borrower for review and correction/explanation, if necessary.
[0039] With all the requisite credit and other information input, the loan application is submitted for underwriting and pricing (step 64), as described in greater detail hereinafter. Generally, underwriting engine 24 determines product eligibility based on preselected/preprogrammed rules. Underwriting engine 24 calls pricing engine 22 for the interest rate and point combination for each loan product.
[0040] The product affirmatively selected by the borrower (FIGS. 2 j and 2k), is desirably underwritten first. Underwriting engine 24 will also underwrite the borrower for all available loan products (decision 65) and determine those products for which the borrower is approved (decision 66). The response to the loan originator is all of the approved products and their associated interest rate quotes (step 68, FIGS. 2 p and 2q). It should be appreciated that this allows the borrower to review all of the information, compare loan products and interest rate quotes (e.g., side-by-side), and select the loan that best fits the borrower's needs (step 74, FIG. 2 r).
[0041] Preferably, during underwriting, underwriting engine 24 also executes a process to determine for each approved product (i) the minimum amount of verification documentation required, (ii) the selected loan underwriting parameters (e.g., maximum loan amount, maximum loan amount for bundling closing costs and minimum refinance amount), and (iii) the maximums and minimums used to tailor the interest rate quote (maximum schedule interest rate and maximum number of points) and maximum interest rate approved for float up to a preselected increase over a current approved rate.
[0042] Additionally, during underwriting, underwriting engine 24 executes the collateral assessment module 26 to determine the required level of appraisal field work (i.e., waived, exterior-only property inspection, or interior and exterior property inspection). Preferably, collateral assessment module 26 will also compare the statistical predicted value retrieved earlier in the property assessment process against the purchase price or estimated appraisal value of the underlying real property. An appraisal will be waived if the purchase price or estimated appraisal value is accepted.
[0043] As described in greater detail hereinafter, in the event that the borrower is not approved for any loans, the loan originator is preferably provided with information from underwriting engine 24 identifying problem areas with respect to the borrower's application and suggested areas for improving the borrower's chances for approval (e.g., lower loan amount or reduce debt), and the borrower may be referred to a help center to receive the benefit of such information and suggestions (step 70). Additionally, the HUD median income information provided during the property assessment process may be used to determine if the borrower is eligible for other types of loan products. Also, in the event that no approved products are returned, the borrower is preferably given the opportunity to review, amend and resubmit the loan application (decision 71) prior to the end of the session on system 10 (step 72). If the borrower opts to amend the loan application, the process returns to step 64 and the amended loan application is re-submitted for underwriting and pricing.
[0044] With the borrower approved and the selected loan captured by system 10 (step 74, FIG. 2 s), the options for aggregating lender fees (i.e., the loan originator's actual out-of-pocket fees and expenses and a prorated portion of overhead expenses and reasonable profit associated with loan origination and closing) and core closing costs (i.e., all settlement and closing costs and fees including title search/abstract costs, title examination fees, title insurance fees, etc.) with the loan principal are captured (step 75). The borrower is then asked to register with the prospect or loan originator (step 76, FIG. 2 t). Registering with the prospect/loan originator provides the borrower with the ability to (i) specify a lock option (e.g., float or lock) as described in greater detail below, (ii) check on loan status (e.g., documentation received?, appraisal completed, if required?, title search completed?). It should be understood that, if the borrower is floating, he/she can request a current “live” rate quote for the selected product at any time.
[0045] Once loan approval is secured and the interest rate is locked in (step 78), the loan qualification and application process is complete and a closing date is set (step 80). FIG. 2 u depicts an exemplar of an Internet display screen congratulating the borrower on the successful completion of the online loan application.
[0046] Additionally, the loan originator may wish to sell the loan to a secondary mortgage market purchaser in the secondary market. Upon receiving a request to sell the individual loan, pricing engine 22 calculates a live (“spot”) sales price for delivery to the loan originator in a manner described in greater detail hereinafter (step 84). It should be understood that the loan originator may initiate a request for a spot sales price for the loan in the system pipeline at any time after the loan has been rate locked in order to value the individual loan in the secondary mortgage market without selling the loan. However, the loan cannot be sold until it is closed.
[0047] Referring now to FIGS. 3 through 13 , in a preferred embodiment, probable qualification calculator 20 carries out a four stage process to return a probable qualification assessment to a potential borrower. As discussed in greater detail below, the first stage of the process involves soliciting the potential borrower's responses to questions presented in an online questionnaire, and, based on initial responses, determining whether the borrower meets the eligibility requirements for the type of loan(s) being considered. With eligibility requirements satisfied, the second stage of the process involves translating the potential borrower's responses to the online questionnaire into a proxy credit score. The third stage involves assigning a statistical weight to the proxy credit score and assigning weights to responses entered concerning non-credit related loan characteristics. The values of all of the weights for the individual characteristic responses are then added together and converted into a probability. The fourth and final stage of the process involves mapping the calculated probability to an empirically determined range of underwriting approval rates.
[0048] Referring to FIG. 3 , the potential borrower completes and submits to the loan originator an electronic or online questionnaire which requires the potential borrower to provide certain information as well as the purpose of the loan (step 100). Other information solicited in the questionnaire may include, but is not necessarily limited to, the property type (e.g., single family dwelling), the potential borrower's employment status (e.g., self-employed?), assets, annual income, monthly debt, and the number of times the potential borrower was late on credit over the previous several years. Preferably, several of the initial questions are used to determine whether the loan meets eligibility guidelines of the secondary mortgage market purchaser.
[0049] The questionnaire identifies loan factors and borrower characteristics that are used to provide an approval recommendation within existing underwriting schemes. Such factors are identified by employing statistical regression techniques applied to a historical sample of underwriting submissions with valid recommendations. Once the most influential factors are isolated and identified, the questionnaire is composed to capture this information from the potential borrower.
[0050] A representative sample of questions and formats requested for probable qualification calculator 20 in the online questionnaire is reproduced in Table 1 below.
[0051]
| TABLE 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Data | Text for Field Description in | ||
| Item | Field | Web Page | Data Format |
| 1 | Loan Purpose | Type of home loan | 1 = Purchase |
| 2 = Refinance | |||
| 2a | Current | What is your current mortgage | Dollar amount |
| Mortgage | balance? | ||
| Balance | |||
| 3b | Property | Purchase price | Dollar amount |
| Value | |||
| 3a | Property | What is the current value of the | Dollar amount |
| Value | property? | ||
| 4b | Funds for | Funds for down payment and closing | Dollar amount |
| Down | costs | ||
| Payment and | |||
| Closing Costs | |||
| 4a | Loan Amount | What is the loan amount? | Dollar amount |
| 5 | Property Type | Is the property a Condominium? | 0 = No Condo |
| 1 = Condo | |||
| 6 | Property | I will use the home as... | 1 = Primary residence |
| Usage | 2 = Second home | ||
| 7 | Loan Type | Loan type | 1 = 30 Year Fixed rate |
| 2 = 15 Year Fixed rate | |||
| 3 = Adjustable Rate | |||
| Mortgage | |||
| 4 = Balloon | |||
| 8 | Number of | How many borrowers will be on the | 1 = One |
| Borrowers | home loan application? | 2 = Two | |
| 9 | Self | Are any of the borrowers | 0 = No |
| Employed | self employed? | 1 = Yes | |
| 10 | Liquid Assets | Current Cash Value of Assets | Dollar amount |
| 11 | Annual | Annual income | Dollar amount |
| Income of all | |||
| Borrowers | |||
| Combined | |||
| 12 | Monthly Debt | Total monthly debt payments not | Dollar amount |
| Payments | including current home loan or rent | ||
| payment. | |||
| 13 | Bankruptcies, | During the past 10 years have you filed | 0 = No |
| foreclosures, | for bankruptcy, had a home | 1 = Yes | |
| tax liens or | foreclosed, had a tax lien filed against | ||
| garnishments | you, or had your income garnished by | ||
| a creditor? | |||
| 14 | First Credit | When did you open your very first | 1 = Less than 1 year ago |
| Account | credit account? | 2 = From 1 up to 2 years | |
| ago | |||
| 3 = Greater than 2 up to | |||
| 5 years ago | |||
| 4 = Greater than 5 up to | |||
| 10 yrs ago | |||
| 5 = More than 10 years | |||
| ago | |||
| 15 | Credit | How many new credit accounts have | 1 = Fewer than 5 |
| Accounts | you opened in the past 2 years? | 2 = 5 or more | |
| 16 | Late on | When was the last time you were more | 1 = Never delinquent |
| Credit. | than a month late on a credit account | 2 = less than 1 year ago | |
| payment? | 3 = From 1 up to 3 years | ||
| ago | |||
| 4 = Greater than 3 up to | |||
| 7 yrs ago | |||
| 5 = More than 7 years | |||
| ago | |||
| 17 | Number of | How many times during the last 7 | 0 = 0 |
| Times late on | years have you been more than one | 1 = 1 | |
| credit | month late on a credit account | 2 = 2 | |
| payment? | 3 = 3 | ||
| 4 = 4 | |||
| 5 = 5 or more | |||
| 18 | Credit Limits | What is the approximate total dollar | 0 - 10,000 |
| amount of your current borrowing | 10,001 - 20,000 | ||
| power? (i.e. sum of credit limits on all | 20,001 - 30,000 | ||
| credit cards) | 30,001 - 50,000 | ||
| over 50,000 | |||
| 19 | Credit | What is the approximate total dollar | 0 - 1,000 |
| Utilization | amount of money you have currently | 1,001 - 3,500 | |
| borrowed? This is the sum of all your | 3,501 - 10,000 | ||
| outstanding credit card balances. | 10,001 - 20,000 | ||
| over 20,000 | |||
| 20 | Interest Rate | Interest Rate | Range of 5% to 10% in |
| 25 basis point | |||
| increments | |||
[0052] With the potential borrower's initial information and loan purpose input, the process proceeds to decision 102 which queries whether the loan purpose is a purchase or a refinance. If the loan purpose is a refinance, the potential borrower is prompted to enter refinance and home information (step 104a); if the loan purpose is a purchase, the borrower is prompted to enter purchase and home information (step 104b): As shown in Table 1, the questions differ depending on the loan purpose, i.e., purchase or refinance (data item 1). For example, referring to Table 1, if the loan is a purchase, data items 3b and 4b should be presented to the potential borrower. If the loan is a refinance, data items 2a, 3a, and 4a should be presented.
[0053] Prior to the completion of the data entry, data inputs are checked for validity for both refinance or purchase loans (steps 106a,b). For example, the amount entered in response to system 10's request for the current cash value of the potential borrower's assets (data item 10 in Table 1) must be equal to or greater than the amount entered for funds for down payment and closing costs (data item 4b). When the potential borrower enters a value for the current cash value of assets, system 10 checks it against the amount for down payment and closing costs. If the current value of assets is insufficient, a message along the lines of the following message is preferably displayed to the potential borrower:
-
- [0054] “The current cash value of assets must be greater than or equal to the funds for down payment and closing costs. Please check these two amounts.”
[0055] Thus, if all inputs are not valid, the process revisits steps 104a,b. If all inputs are valid, the process moves to steps 108a,b and sets the loan purpose as either refinance (step 108a) or purchase (step 108b), as appropriate.
[0056] With the loan purpose set as either refinance (step 108a) or purchase (step 108b), and prior to the completion of the data, input, system 10 determines whether or not the loan meets preselected eligibility requirements of the secondary mortgage market purchaser (steps 110a,b, 112a,b). This is accomplished by using the first several responsive data inputs to the online questionnaire to compare product, purpose, occupancy, and calculated loan-to-value ratio (“LTV”) to the secondary mortgage market purchaser's preselected underwriting guidelines which are retrievably stored in system database 16. LTV is preferably derived as follows:
LTV when loan purpose is purchase=1−(down payment amount/purchase price)
LTV when loan purpose is refinance=loan amount/property value
LTV when loan purpose is purchase=1−(down payment amount/purchase price)
LTV when loan purpose is refinance=loan amount/property value
[0057] A loan may be designated ineligible under preselected underwriting guidelines for one of two reasons. The first reason is that the product, purpose, and occupancy selected are ineligible. The second reason is that the maximum LTV for the specific product, purpose and occupancy selected is restricted. The guidelines depicted in Table 2 below list representative maximum LTV's for each product, purpose, and occupancy type that fall within the scope of preselected requirements.
[0058]
| TABLE 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Purpose | Occupancy | LTV % | |
| Fixed Rate | Purchase | Primary Residence | 97.00 | |
| Second Home | 95.00 | |||
| Refinance | Primary Residence | 90.00 | ||
| Second Home | 90.00 | |||
| ARM | Purchase | Primary Residence | 95.00 | |
| Second Home | 95.00 | |||
| Refinance | Primary Residence | 90.00 | ||
| Second Home | 90.00 | |||
| Balloon | Purchase | Primary Residence | 95.00 | |
| Second Home | 95.00 | |||
| Refinance | Primary Residence | 90.00 | ||
| Second Home | 90.00 | |||
[0059] If the potential borrower enters a combination of factors that is ineligible, the borrower is notified immediately of the ineligibility and is prompted to either change the selection or call a help center for assistance (action 116). It should be understood that this allows the potential borrower to change the response to a previous question and then continue on with the probable qualification process. If the potential borrower passes the eligibility screening, the borrower then is permitted to continue on with the probable qualification assessment and receives no eligibility feedback.
[0060] Referring still to FIG. 3 , system 10 accepts credit related information inputs concerning the potential borrower (step 120). As with previous information inputs, the credit information inputs are checked for validity (decision 122). If inputs are not valid, the process revisits step 120. If all inputs are valid, the process continues to step 128.
[0061] At step 128, the borrower information submitted is evaluated in real time and calculator 20 calculates (before an actual loan application is submitted) the probability that the potential borrower will be approved for a loan. It should be appreciated that, contrary to common practice, this prequalification process is accomplished without the need to obtain a credit report on the potential borrower. Rather, as described in greater detail below, the potential borrower's responses to the questionnaire are translated by computer software into a “proxy” credit score, statistical weights are assigned to the loan characteristics, and the result is then converted into the probability of obtaining a loan approval.
[0062] Since a credit report is not obtained, a credit score is approximated by calculator 20 based on the potential borrower's responses to the questions seeking information regarding payment history and history of credit problems, such as bankruptcy, foreclosures, tax liens, or garnishments (data item 13). Preferably, a proxy credit score is calculated differently for potential borrowers who have indicated in their response to the credit questions that they have been late on a credit payment in the recent past (for example, within the previous 7 years) and those who did not.
[0063] For borrowers without a history of credit delinquency, the proxy credit score is preferably calculated as follows:
Proxy Credit Score (w/out delinquencies)=578+weight for credit utilization+weight for number of accounts+weight for age of credit history+weight for public records
Proxy Credit Score (w/out delinquencies)=578+weight for credit utilization+weight for number of accounts+weight for age of credit history+weight for public records
[0064] For borrowers with a history of credit delinquency, the proxy credit score is preferably calculated as follows:
Proxy Credit Score (with delinquencies)=525+weight for credit utilization and age of delinquency+weight for number of accounts+weight for age of credit history+weight for public records
Proxy Credit Score (with delinquencies)=525+weight for credit utilization and age of delinquency+weight for number of accounts+weight for age of credit history+weight for public records
[0065] Using data obtained from the borrower questionnaire, the credit utilization ratio (the desired percentage of credit utilized) is preferably calculated as the dollar amount of credit used/dollar amount of total credit limit.
[0066]
[0067] The options presented to the potential borrower by system 10 for the dollar amount of credit utilized are preferably:
-
- [0068] $0-$1,000
- [0069] $1,001-$3,500
- [0070] $3,501-$10,000
- [0071] $10,001-$20,000
- [0072] over $20,000
[0073] While the current options presented to the potential borrower by system 10 for the dollar amount of total credit limits are preferably:
-
- [0074] $0-$10,000
- [0075] $10,001-$20,000
- [0076] $20,001-$30,000
- [0077] $30,001-$50,000
- [0078] over $50,000
Example 1
[0079] If the potential borrower selects the range “$1,001-$3,500” for credit utilized, and “over $50,000” for credit limit, the % of credit used calculation would be as follows:
[0080]
Example 2
[0081] If the potential borrower selects the range “$3,501-$10,000” for credit utilized, and “$0-$10,000” for credit limit, the % of credit used calculation would be as follows:
[0082]
[0083] The primary difference in calculating a proxy credit score for the group consisting of those who have had a delinquency, as opposed to the group consisting of those without delinquencies, is that information concerning any delinquency is combined with a credit utilization ratio to determine a component of the proxy credit score. Also, the range of proxy credit scores is lower for this group (525-753) than it is for those without delinquencies (578-781).
[0084] The foregoing weights by attribute or characteristic preferably reside in look up tables in the system 10 database. Examples of look up tables for proxy credit scores with and without delinquencies are reproduced in Tables 3 and 4 below.
[0085]
| TABLE 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proxy Credit Score Attribute Weights for Applicants | ||||
| Without Delinquencies | ||||
| Proxy | ||||
| Credit | Maxi- | Mini- | ||
| Score | mum | mum | ||
| Characteristic | Attribute | Points | Score | Score |
| Base Score/Intercept | 578 | 578 | 578 | |
| Utilization | 80 < utilization % | 0 | 0 | |
| (Percentage of | 40 < Utilization % <= 80 | 19 | ||
| revolving Credit | 20 < utilization % <= 40 | 38 | ||
| that is utilized) | 10 < utilization % < 20 | 54 | ||
| Utilization % <= 10 | 75 | 75 | ||
| How many | Number accts. => 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| accounts have | ||||
| Been established in | Number accts. < 5 | 23 | 23 | |
| last 2 year | ||||
| Age of credit history | Years < 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 <= years < 5 | 18 | |||
| 5 <= years < 10 | 34 | |||
| 10 <= years | 52 | 52 | ||
| Public Record | Yes | 0 | 0 | |
| (Bankruptcies, | No | 53 | 53 | |
| forclosures, | ||||
| tax liens, | ||||
| garnishments) | ||||
| Proxy Score = | 781 | 578 | ||
| sum of point | ||||
[0086]
Like LTV discussed above, weights may also be derived from the data entered by the potential borrower in response to the questions posed in the questionnaire. For example, monthly payment amount may be derived as follows given that the potential borrower enters the loan amount to be borrowed, the interest rate and the term of the loan.
Monthly payment=(Loan Amount/(1−1/(1+Monthly Interest Rate)Term In Months)/Monthly Interest Rate)
where Monthly Interest Rate=(1+Annual Interest Rate)1/12−1
| TABLE 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proxy Credit Score Attribute Weights for Applicants With Delinquencies | |||||
| Proxy Credit | Maximum | Minimum | |||
| Characteristic | Attribute | Score Point | Score | Score | |
| Base Score / Intercept | 525 | 525 | 525 | ||
| Utilization | 80 < utilization % | ||||
| (Percentage of | delq.< 1 yr | 0 | 0 | ||
| revolving) | |||||
| Credit that is utilized) | 1 yr <= delq. < 3 yrs | 39 | |||
| and Recency of | 3 yrs <= delq. < 7 yrs | 54 | |||
| Delinquency | |||||
| 40 < utilization % <= 80 | |||||
| delq. < 1 yr | 19 | ||||
| 1 yr <= delq. < 3 yrs | 56 | ||||
| 3 yrs <= delq. < 7 yrs | 68 | ||||
| 20 < utilization % <= 40 | |||||
| delq. < 1 yr | 42 | ||||
| 1 yr <= delq. < 3 yrs | 79 | ||||
| 3 yrs <= delq. < 7 yrs | 90 | ||||
| 10 < utilization % <= 20 | |||||
| delq. < 1 yr | 59 | ||||
| 1 yr <= delq. <3 yrs | 97 | ||||
| 3 yrs <= delq. <7 yrs | 108 | ||||
| Utilization % <= | |||||
| 10 | |||||
| delq. < 1 yr | 78 | ||||
| 1 yr <= delq. < 3 yrs | 115 | ||||
| 3 yrs <= delq. < 7 yrs | 127 | 127 | |||
| How many accounts | Number accts. => 5 | 0 | 0 | ||
| have been established in | Number accts. < 5 | 16 | 16 | ||
| last 2 years | |||||
| Age of credit history | Years < 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2 <= years < 5 | 26 | ||||
| 5 <= years < 10 | 43 | ||||
| 10 <= years | 57 | 57 | |||
| Public Record | Yes | 0 | 0 | ||
| (Bankruptcies, | No | 28 | 28 | ||
| foreclosures, tax liens, | |||||
| garnishments) | |||||
| Proxy Score = sum of | 753 | 525 | |||
| points | |||||
Like LTV discussed above, weights may also be derived from the data entered by the potential borrower in response to the questions posed in the questionnaire. For example, monthly payment amount may be derived as follows given that the potential borrower enters the loan amount to be borrowed, the interest rate and the term of the loan.
Monthly payment=(Loan Amount/(1−1/(1+Monthly Interest Rate)Term In Months)/Monthly Interest Rate)
where Monthly Interest Rate=(1+Annual Interest Rate)1/12−1
[0087] If the purpose of the loan is to refinance, the potential borrower provides the loan amount. If however, the purpose of the loan is a purchase, the loan amount is calculated as follows:
Loan Amount=home purchase price−down payment
It should be understood that the down payment value used is the one extracted from the borrower's input for funds available for down payment and closing costs and not the raw value provided for funds available, which includes both down payment and closing items.
Loan Amount=home purchase price−down payment
It should be understood that the down payment value used is the one extracted from the borrower's input for funds available for down payment and closing costs and not the raw value provided for funds available, which includes both down payment and closing items.
[0088] Table 5 below is a chart showing model weights assigned to certain borrower characteristics.
[0089]
Once the characteristics have been assigned weighting coefficients, they are summed and converted to an overall probability using the following formula:
estimated probability of not getting approved=EXP(SUM of coefficients)/(1+EXP(SUM of coefficients)
The result is the estimated probability of not getting approved for a loan. For example, if the estimated probability is 15%, this means that the borrower has an 85% chance of being approved for a loan.
| TABLE 5 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range of Outcomes | ||||
| High | Low | |||
| Characteristic | Attibute | Weight | Boundary | Boundary |
| Base Probability/Intercept | −7.4505 | −7.4505 | ||
| Proxy Credit Score | 741 + | 0 | 0 | |
| 720 <= 740 | 0.2252 | |||
| 700 <= 720 | 0.873 | |||
| 680 <= 700 | 1.5279 | |||
| 660 <= 680 | 2.0891 | |||
| 640 <= 660 | 2.5864 | |||
| 620 <= 640 | 3.0853 | |||
| 600 <= 620 | 3.4438 | |||
| 580 <= 600 | 3.7109 | |||
| 560 <= 580 | 3.9171 | |||
| 540 <= 560 | 4.0484 | |||
| <= 540 | 4.0452 | 4.0452 | ||
| Combined LTV | <= 70 | 0 | 0 | |
| 70 <= 80 | 0.8801 | |||
| 80 <= 90 | 2.3162 | |||
| 90 <= 97 | 2.8347 | 2.8347 | ||
| Back Ratio | <= 20 | 0 | 0 | |
| 20 <= 31 | 0.3557 | |||
| 31 <= 36 | 0.511 | |||
| 36 <= 45 | 0.6244 | |||
| 46 + | 1.129 | 1.129 | ||
| (Liquid Assets- | ||||
| Down payment) | 10001 + | 0 | 0 | |
| 5000 <= 10000 | 0.4349 | |||
| 3000 <= 5000 | 0.7601 | |||
| 2000 <= 3000 | 1.0667 | |||
| 1000 <= 2000 | 1.4492 | |||
| 1 <= 1000 | 2.1364 | |||
| 0 | 3.3219 | 3.3219 | ||
| Term of Loan | Term <= 15 yrs | 0 | 0 | |
| 15 < Term <= 25 yrs | 0.8115 | |||
| Term > 25 yrs | 1.1472 | 1.1472 | ||
| Self Employed | No | 0 | 0 | |
| Yes | 1.0178 | 1.0178 | ||
| Two or More Borrowers | No | 0 | 0 | |
| Yes | −0.6865 | −0.6865 | ||
| Amortization Type | Fixed Rate Mortgage | 0 | 0 | |
| Balloon Mortgage | 0 | |||
| Adjustable Rate Mortgage | 0.6609 | 0.6609 | ||
| Occupancy Status | Owner Occupied | 0.0167 | 0.0167 | |
| Second Home | 0.1324 | |||
| Investor Property | 0 | 0 | ||
| Number of Units | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3-4 | 0.0664 | 0.0664 | ||
| Condo | No | 0 | 0 | |
| Yes | 0.1058 | 0.1058 | ||
| Derogatory Record | No | 0 | 0 | |
| Yes | 0.8902 | 0.8902 | ||
| Loan Purpose | Purchase | 0.3416 | ||
| (money | ||||
| mort- | ||||
| gage) | ||||
| Refinance: increase =< 0 | 1.1672 | 1.1672 | ||
| Refinance: increase 0.1-3% | −0.3111 | |||
| Refinance: increase 3.1-10% | 0.0661 | |||
| Refinance: increase 10.1- | 0.0359 | |||
| 19% | ||||
| Refinance: increase > 19% | 0 | 0 | ||
| Weight = sum of coefficients | −8.1203 | 16.3863 | ||
| Estimated Probability = exp(weight)/(1 + exp(weight)) | 0.030% | 100.000% | ||
Once the characteristics have been assigned weighting coefficients, they are summed and converted to an overall probability using the following formula:
estimated probability of not getting approved=EXP(SUM of coefficients)/(1+EXP(SUM of coefficients)
The result is the estimated probability of not getting approved for a loan. For example, if the estimated probability is 15%, this means that the borrower has an 85% chance of being approved for a loan.
[0090] Since it is desirable to communicate to the potential borrower the likelihood of getting approved, the foregoing result is desirably converted as follows and presented to the potential borrower:
probability of approval=1−probability of not getting approved
It should be appreciated that, alternatively, the likelihood of getting approved may be calculated directly as follows:
probability of approval=1−[EXP(SUM of coefficients)/(1+EXP(SUM of coefficients)]
probability of approval=1−probability of not getting approved
It should be appreciated that, alternatively, the likelihood of getting approved may be calculated directly as follows:
probability of approval=1−[EXP(SUM of coefficients)/(1+EXP(SUM of coefficients)]
[0091] After the probability of approval is calculated (step 128), the process proceeds to decision 130 which queries whether an eligibility exception is present. For example, if the potential borrower is seeking a mortgage for greater than the value of the property, an eligibility exception will be present.
[0092] If a “yes” response is returned at decision 130, calculator 20 provides an explanation with the opportunity to start the process over (event 134). If a “no” response is returned, the process proceeds to step 138 where the final probability is checked.
[0093] The probable qualification process ends when the probable qualification determination is presented to the potential borrower in the form of a useful and readily understandable percentage chance of approval which can be easily and meaningfully compared against determinations made for other potential available loan products to permit the potential borrower to make an informed loan decision (display 140, or 142, or 144). It should be understood that the estimated probabilities for approval generated by calculator 20 closely approximate actual approval rates, thereby giving potential borrowers an accurate assessment of their likelihood of approval should they decide to proceed with the loan application.
[0094] As illustrated in Table 6 below, potential borrowers who have a probability of getting approved of 80% or higher will preferably be presented with the actual numerical estimate of the likelihood that their loan will be approved shown as a percentage (event 140). For potential borrowers who have a 60-80% probability of getting approved, the actual percentage will preferably not be displayed (event 142). For those potential borrowers who have an estimated probability of approval below 60%, the actual percentage will preferably not be displayed in favor of the displayed recommendation that they consult a loan counselor (event 144).
[0095]
| TABLE 6 |
|---|
| For loans where 80% <= estimated probability of approval: |
| [estimated probability of approval, truncated so that the range |
| is 80% to 99%] of people who answered the questions the way you did |
| were approved for home loans. Since this free estimation tool does not |
| guaranty that you’ll be approved for a home loan, the way to find out |
| for certain is to apply. To begin the online application, click the |
| “Save and Apply Now” button below. |
| If you want to change any of the information you previously entered |
| to see how it affects your results, feel free to click the “Try |
| Again” button below. |
| For loans where 60% <= estimated probability of approval < 80%: |
| The majority of people who answered the questions the way you |
| did were approved. Since this free estimation tool does not guaranty that |
| you’ll be approved for a home loan, the way to find out for certain is |
| to apply. We also encourage you to call our help center to speak to one of |
| our loan consultants. |
| If you want to change any of the information you previously |
| entered, feel free to click the “Try Again” button below. |
| For loans where the estimated probability of approval < 60%: |
| We have insufficient information to give you a response at |
| this time. If you want to change any of the information you previously |
| entered to see how it affects your results, feel free to click the “Try |
| Again” button below. We also encourage you to call our help |
| center to speak to one of our loan consultants. We will work with you to |
| come up with the right home loan solution to meet your needs. Or you can |
| proceed directly to the online application by clicking the “Save and |
| Apply Now” button below. |
[0096] FIGS. 4-13 depict preferred exemplars of computer Internet interface display screens used to guide a potential borrower through the online probable qualification process.
[0097] Referring to FIGS. 4 and 5 , (steps 1 and 2, respectively) the potential borrower is prompted to provide responses to online questions which ask for information such as, for example: (i) the loan purpose (e.g., purchase or refinance), the number of borrowers who will be named on the loan application, (ii) the potential borrower's annual income, (iii) whether or not the potential borrower is self-employed, (iv) the potential borrower's monthly debt payments exclusive of current mortgage payment obligations or rent, (v) the current cash value of the potential borrower's assets, (vi) whether or not the subject property is a condominium, (vii) the intended use of the property (e.g., as a primary residence), (viii) the loan type (e.g., 30 year fixed rate), (ix) the anticipated purchase price, and (x) the available funds for down payment and closing. It should be understood that the funds available for down payment and closing cannot be greater than the input current cash value of the potential borrower's assets.
[0098] FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate an effect of the selection of refinance as the loan purpose. As shown in FIG. 7 , a somewhat different set of questions from the purchase scenario is presented to the potential borrower. Rather than questions regarding purchase price and funds for down payment and closing, the borrower is prompted to respond to questions concerning current mortgage balance, current property value and the desired loan amount.
[0099] Certain combinations of income, debt, loan amount/down payment, property value and loan type produce loan profiles that are not handled by calculator 20. Such loans are deemed to be ineligible. The determination of eligibility can be made after receiving inputs from steps 1 and 2 (regardless of whether purchase or refinance is selected). If calculator 20 determines that the input characteristics indicate ineligibility, a message such as depicted in FIG. 8 is displayed.
[0100] As stated above, it should be understood that the funds available for down payment and closing cannot be greater than the input current cash value of the potential borrower's assets. If the current cash value of assets is less than the amount indicated as funds available for down payment and closing costs, a message preferably such as depicted in FIG. 9 is displayed.
[0101] Step 3, the final step, is concerned with the potential borrower's credit. As depicted in FIG. 10 , the potential borrower is prompted to provide responses to online questions which ask for information such as, for example: (i) whether or not in the previous ten (10) years the borrower filed for bankruptcy, or had a loan foreclosed, or had a tax lien filed against him/her, or had income garnished by a creditor, (ii) when the potential borrower opened his/her first credit account, (iii) the number of new credit accounts opened in the previous two (2) years, (iv) the last time the potential borrower was more than a month late on a credit account payment, (v) the total credit potentially available to the potential borrower, and (vi) the potential borrower's total outstanding credit balance. The last two questions combine to produce the percentage of credit used (i.e., money borrowed divided by borrowing limit) which, utilizing the tables set forth above, is used to arrive at the proxy credit score.
[0102] Step 3 does not depend on whether purchase or refinance was selected by the potential borrower as the loan purpose in step 1—but the borrower will not reach step 3 unless the loan was deemed to be eligible after completion of step 2. At the completion of step 3, the calculated probable qualification assessment is communicated to the potential borrower (e.g., after the borrower clicks on the “See Results” button on the previous screen depicted in FIG. 10 ).
[0103] If the calculated probability of approval is equal to or greater than 80%, the exact approval figure is presented to the potential borrower. In FIG. 11 for example, an 86% approval figure is displayed.
[0104] With probabilities of approval less than 80% but equal to or greater than 60%, percentage figures of approval are preferably not shown. The results message depicted in FIG. 12 however, is preferably displayed to users in this middle bracket.
[0105] With a probability of approval of less than 60%, a message such as shown in FIG. 13 is preferably displayed to the potential borrower.
[0106] If the borrower chooses to apply for a loan, the loan originator makes a request for an underwriting decision. In response to such request, system 10, through underwriting engine 24, will provide to the loan originator an underwriting recommendation, lender and borrower findings, and a borrower/product specific interest rate as described in greater detail hereinafter. It should be recognized that if the borrower used probable qualification calculator 20, all applicable information will preferably populate the loan application to minimize data entry.
[0107] Prior to commencement of the underwriting process, it is desirable that a credit report be obtained on the potential borrower. The principal reasons for obtaining a credit report at this point are twofold: (1) to speed loan evaluation so that when the loan application is ready to be underwritten, the process need not be delayed while the credit report is obtained from outside credit agencies, and (2) to extract the potential borrower's real estate tradelines (e.g., outstanding mortgages, home equity loans) appearing on the credit report and present them to the borrower for clarification if necessary (e.g., that the tradeline has already been paid off, or that it will be paid off with the present contemplated loan, or that it is in error). Also, it should be appreciated that this reduces the level of data entry expected from the potential borrower as the borrower need not enter information concerning any tradelines. Moreover, this streamlines processing by the lender by eliminating the need for the lender to reconcile tradelines prior to underwriting.
[0108] A property assessment is also preferably obtained prior to underwriting for three principal reasons: (1) to speed loan evaluation, (2) to permit the potential borrower the opportunity to correct the address of the underlying property if necessary, and (3) to determine government HUD median income information for use by underwriting engine 24 in connection with the problem solution finding process or borrower guidance process described in greater detail hereinafter. Generally, the solution finding process is a process within underwriting that provides the loan originator with suggestions regarding potential areas for improvement in the event a borrower is not approved by underwriting engine 24 (e.g., the suggestion that the potential borrower apply more money toward the down payment to lower LTV). The solution finding process can use the HUD median income information to determine if the borrower meets low/moderate income requirements. This information is provided to the loan originator and can be used if the loan originator wishes to offer other types of products to the borrower.
[0109] Underwriting engine 24 provides to the loan originator one of two recommendations: (1) “approved,” or (2) “refer to help center” or like message. It should be understood that the underwriting recommendation provided by the secondary mortgage market participant (preferably, Fannie Mae) through underwriting engine 24 for each loan submitted through system 10 does not constitute an approval or denial of the loan application by such secondary market participant. With respect to loan applications which receive a “refer to help center” recommendation, the loan originator will preferably work with the potential borrower, as appropriate, to (i) reconcile inaccurate information in the loan application, (ii) counsel the potential borrower regarding ways to improve the likelihood of obtaining an approval, and (iii) resubmit the application for re-underwriting through system 10.
[0110] For loan applications receiving an “approved” recommendation, underwriting engine 24 preferably communicates the conditions to be satisfied by the loan originator and the potential borrower before the application can proceed to closing. These conditions preferably include (i) the required level of collateral appraisal field work, if any, (ii) title insurance requirements, (iii) required information relating to verification of the potential borrower's income, assets, employment, and identity, and (iv) review and collection of required supporting documentation.
[0111] It should be understood that the foregoing verification process may require human participation. For example, in the case of a mortgage loan, a credit report is pulled and may require review, and, notwithstanding the waiver of the requirement for an appraisal by collateral assessment module 26 (as discussed in greater detail hereinafter), the loan originator might arrange at least for a cursory exterior-only inspection of the underlying real estate.
[0112] For loan applications receiving a “refer to help center” recommendation, underwriting engine 24 preferably provides problem solving or guidance information to facilitate borrower counseling by the loan originator regarding steps the potential borrower can take to improve the likelihood of approval within system 10. This is the problem solution process referred to above. Such guidance information preferably includes the amount the down payment needs to be increased, and the amount of debt that the potential borrower needs to pay off.
[0113] The process between underwriting and pricing is iterative. For each product on which system 10 is making an underwriting decision, pricing engine 22 is invoked to provide a borrower/product specific interest rate, and underwriting engine 24 underwrites the selected product as described in greater detail hereinafter. The interaction between underwriting and pricing is best illustrated in FIG. 14 a.
[0114] Underwriting engine 24 underwrites the borrower for selected loan products as well as for other available products, and determines if the borrower is approved for each product. The response to the loan originator is all of the approved products and their associated interest rate quotes. This allows the borrower to review all the information, compare products and interest rates and select the product that best fits the borrower's needs.
[0115] Underwriting engine 24 also determines, for each approved product, the minimum amount of verification documentation (e.g., minimum assets to verify, minimum income to verify), selected loan underwriting parameters, assuming no other data changes, (e.g., maximum loan amount for approval, maximum loan amount for aggregating closing costs with the loan principal, and minimum refinance amount), as well as the maximums and minimums used to tailor the interest rate quote (maximum schedule interest rate and maximum number of points) and maximum interest rate approved for float up to a preselected increase over a current approved rate. It should be appreciated that this allows the potential borrower to provide only that information that is necessary for an approval decision, rather than all potentially relevant financial and other borrower information. This also reduces the processing burden on system 10.
[0116] Referring now to FIG. 14 a, when the loan originator makes an underwrite and price request, the request is received by underwriting engine 24 (step 200). If the loan originator provides the borrower selected product and indicative interest rate (decision 202), the process continues to step 204. If the loan originator is not providing an indicative interest rate with a selected product, underwriting engine 24 preferably requests a sample indicative interest rate (e.g., for a “typical” borrower) to seed or start the underwriting process for a specific product, and pricing engine 22 returns the seed interest rate (step 206). It should be understood that the seed interest rate may be the same as the enticement interest rate described herein.
[0117] Underwriting engine 24 then determines the data required to generate a borrower/product specific interest rate (step 204). Thereafter, underwriting engine 24 requests the borrower/product specific interest rate, and pricing engine 22 then calculates the borrower/product specific interest rate and the yield/point trade-off schedule to be returned to the loan originator in a manner described in greater detail hereinafter in connection with FIG. 15 (step 208).
[0118] At decision 210, underwriting engine 24 determines if the potential borrower is approved for the product at the borrower/product specific interest rate.
[0119] If approved, underwriting engine 24 tailors the yield/point trade-off schedule for the loan product by (i) limiting the upper interest rate boundary by the maximum schedule interest rate and the maximum schedule premium points, and (ii) limiting the lower interest rate boundary by the minimum schedule interest rate and the maximum schedule discount points (in a manner described below in connection with FIG. 14 b). Underwriting engine 24 then provides the underwriting findings and interest rate quotes to the loan originator (step 214).
[0120] The maximum schedule interest rate is the maximum interest rate approved by underwriting engine 24; and the maximum schedule premium points are the maximum number of premium points approved by the underwriting engine. The minimum schedule interest rate is the minimum interest rate approved by underwriting engine 24; and the maximum schedule discount points are the maximum number of discount points approved by the underwriting engine.
[0121] Referring to FIG. 14 b, underwriting engine 24 preferably determines the minimum amount of verification documentation required for each approved borrower-specific loan product. More particularly, underwriting engine 24 determines the minimum income and assets to verify, as appropriate (step 216).
[0122] The selected loan underwriting parameters are then determined (step 217). That is, approval for the maximum loan amount (and LTV), the maximum loan amount for aggregating closing costs with the loan principal, and the minimum refinance amount are determined, as appropriate, provided no other data changes.
[0123] The pricing parameters used to tailor the interest rate quote are then determined (step 218). That is, the maximum schedule interest rate and maximum number of premium points, and minimum schedule interest rate and maximum number of discount points, and maximum market interest rate approved for float (up to a preselected increase over a current approved rate) are determined, as appropriate.
[0124] The foregoing are then used to tailor the borrower/product specific interest rate quote (step 220). After step 220, the process proceeds to step 222 where the underwriting findings are formatted for presentation to the loan originator (see FIG. 14 a, step 214).
[0125] Referring back to FIG. 14 a, once the underwriting findings for a specific selected product are presented to the loan originator, underwriting engine 24 repeats the foregoing process to determine all approved products for the borrower until all such products have been underwritten (step 232). It should be appreciated that this places at the borrower's fingertips a valid, borrower-specific interest rate quote for all loan products for which the borrower has been approved (e.g., whether a 30 year fixed rate mortgage loan, a 15 year fixed rate loan, or other loan product) so that the borrower has a complete range of approved products with associated interest rates to select from.
[0126] If the potential borrower is not approved for any product at step 210, underwriting engine 24 preferably executes a process to provide the loan originator with information designed to provide guidance with respect to problem areas that need to be addressed to improve the potential borrower's chances of approval for the product selected by the potential borrower. As best illustrated in FIG. 14 c, underwriting engine 24 computes the maximum loan amount for approval (step 224), the monthly debt reduction required for approval (step 226), and determines if the potential borrower meets low/moderate income requirements for other types of loan products (step 227).
[0127] Referring to FIG. 14 a, after execution of the problem solution routine, underwriting engine 24 discards the pricing schedule for the specific selected loan product (step 228). If underwriting engine 24 determines that there are additional loan products available for underwriting (step 229), the process repeats (i.e., returns to step 200). If there are no additional loan products to be underwritten, the process ends (event 230).
[0128] Pricing engine 22 of system 10 calculates the retail gross interest rate and points for each approved borrower/loan specific product combination passed through underwriting engine 24 to present to the borrower, as described in greater detail below. Pricing engine 22 also calculates a sales price (spot price) for each loan, i.e., the secondary market price that a secondary mortgage market purchaser will pay the loan originator for the individual loan.
[0129] The gross interest rate calculated by pricing engine 22 preferably includes a portfolio required yield and a customer risk-based price component. The portfolio required yield is a real time required yield based on current market conditions, and is preferably stored in a look up table residing in system 10. The portfolio required yield is also used to determine a spot price.
[0130] The yield/point trade-off schedule shows the relationship between points paid or rebated and the associated change in interest rate (preferably in ⅛ increments) for a given mortgage product. Yield is expressed as an offset from the par portfolio required yield, and points are expressed as offsets from par (100%). An example of a yield/point trade-off schedule is set forth in Table 7 below.
[0131] The customer risk-based price component includes a risk-based guaranty fee and a collateral risk price adjustment, among other appropriate fees and adjustments such as servicing fees and other borrower-specific credit risk price adjustments. The risk-based guaranty fee compensates the secondary mortgage market purchaser for its exposure to the credit risk posed by the particular borrower. The risk-based guaranty fee varies by loan product and is expressed in yield.
[0132] The collateral risk price adjustment is a per loan adjustment to the interest rate to compensate the secondary mortgage market purchaser for any risk arising from not requiring a property appraisal. Relying, in part, on historical data retrieved from a system database concerning the collateral (e.g., prior assessments of real estate, assessments of comparable real estate), collateral assessment module 26 determines the minimum type of appraisal, if any, that is required with respect to each individual loan application submitted for an underwriting recommendation through underwriting engine 24 of system 10. Collateral assessment module 26 may not require any appraisal or property field work. Alternatively, collateral assessment module 26 may require an appraisal with an interior and exterior inspection, or it may require that an appraisal with an exterior-only property inspection be performed and reported to underwriting engine 24. In the event that collateral assessment module 26 waives the appraisal or field work requirement, a loan level interest rate adjustment is made (i.e., the collateral risk price adjustment).
[0133] For loans with an LTV in excess of 80%, pricing engine 22 provides a low down payment rate adjustment to be added to the interest rate. The low down payment rate adjustment compensates the investor for potential borrower default associated with a lower down payment.
[0134] Referring now to FIG. 15 , the following underwriting characteristics are preferably input into pricing engine 22 in order to begin the pricing process: (i) casefile ID, (ii) requested product, (iii) prospect or loan originator ID, (iv) combined loan-to-value (CLTV), (v) LTV, (vi) property type, (vii) loan purpose, (viii) cashout percentage, (ix) self-employment indicator (e.g., Y/N), (x) months of cash reserves, (xi) total expense ratio, (xii) appraisal field work type, and (xiii) appraisal waiver reason (step 300). Pricing engine 22 retrieves the foregoing underwriting characteristics (step 302). The process then proceeds to step 304 where pricing engine 22 calculates the customer risk-based price component.
[0135] FIG. 16 illustrates the calculation of the customer risk-based price component. At step 400, pricing engine 22 retrieves the risk-based guaranty fee. FIG. 17 illustrates the process associated with looking up the risk based guaranty fee.
[0136] With access to the underwriting characteristics input at the beginning of the pricing process as illustrated in FIG. 17 , the lookup process moves to decision 500 which queries if the loan purpose is refinance. If a “no” response is returned, the process moves to decision 502 which queries if the loan purpose is purchase. If a “yes” response is given at decision 500, i.e., if the loan purpose is refinance, the process moves to decision 504 which queries if the equity taken out exceeds closing costs. If a “no” response is given at decision 502, i.e., if the loan purpose is indicated as being neither a purchase nor a refinance, an error message indicating an invalid loan purpose is generated and the process terminates (event 503).
[0137] If, at decision 504 the equity taken out (“cashout percentage”) exceeds closing costs (which represents an increased risk associated with the loan), the process proceeds to step 506 where the loan purpose is set as refinance, and then to step 508 as described below. If the equity taken out does not exceed closing costs, the process proceeds to step 510 where the loan purpose is set as purchase, and then to step 508. The risk associated with a loan refinance where the amount of equity taken out is not believed to be substantially greater than an amount sufficient to cover closing costs is equivalent to the risk associated with a loan the purpose of which is not refinance but rather purchase (hence, step 510).
[0138] If a “yes” response is returned at decision 502, i.e., if the loan purpose is purchase, the process moves to step 508.
[0139] At step 508, pricing engine 22, using the risk-based guaranty fee schedule stored in system 10 associated with the loan registration date and time, looks up the risk-based guaranty fee by the input underwriting characteristics, and makes the fee available for further use in the pricing process.
[0140] Referring back to FIG. 16 , with the retrieval of the risk-based guaranty fee (step 400), pricing engine 22 retrieves the low down payment rate adjustment from a look up table (step 402) and adds it as yield to loans with an LTV over 80% to compensate the investor for potential borrower default associated with a lower down payment.
[0141] At step 404, pricing engine 22 sets the risk-based guaranty fee equal to the risk-based guaranty fee retrieved from the look up table less the low down payment rate adjustment (step 404). Then, based on prospect/loan originator ID and product, pricing engine 22 executes a look-up to retrieve the servicing fee (step 406).
[0142] Pricing engine 22 retrieves a product specific conversion ratio at step 410. Pricing engine 22 then retrieves a technology price adjustment (step 414) and converts it to a basis point value (step 416). It should be appreciated that converting dollar value to basis point value is accomplished by a mathematical calculation that is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
[0143] The process for computing the customer risk-based price component continues to decision 418 which queries whether the requirement for a field property appraisal has been waived. If a “no” response is returned at decision 418, the collateral risk price adjustment is set equal to zero basis points (step 420), and the process proceeds to decision 422, i.e., there is no reason to increase the interest rate of the loan to cover the risk associated with not requiring an appraisal. If a “yes” response is returned at decision 418, the interest rate of the loan needs to be increased to reflect the risk associated with not requiring an appraisal. Pricing engine 22 interrogates the appraisal waiver reason identification to determine the appropriate increase to the interest rate—that is, the process proceeds to decision 424 which queries if the reason for waiving the appraisal is that the market value of the underlying property (as evidenced by the sale price of the property) agrees with the property assessment and has been accepted by system 10.
[0144] If a “no” response is returned at decision 424, the collateral risk price adjustment is set equal to a preselected number of basis points (step 426), and the process proceeds to decision 422. If a “yes” response is returned at decision 424, the collateral risk price adjustment is set equal to another preselected number of basis points (step 428), and the process proceeds to decision 422. It should be understood that the foregoing basis points are preselected based on the risk associated with the loan.
[0145] At decision 422, pricing engine 22 queries if the loan purpose is a refinance. If a “no” response is returned, the title risk price adjustment is set equal to zero basis points (step 430), and the process proceeds to step 432. If a “yes” response is returned at decision 422, the title risk price adjustment is set equal to a preselected number of basis points (step 434), and the process proceeds to step 432.
[0146] At step 432, the customer risk-based price component is calculated as the sum of the risk based guaranty fee, the technology price adjustment, the collateral risk price adjustment, and the title risk price adjustment, among others. The resulting sum is then returned to the pricing process as yield (step 436), and the pricing process continues at step 306 in FIG. 15 .
[0147] Referring back to FIG. 15 , after the customer risk-based price component is calculated (step 304), the pricing process proceeds to step 306 where the portfolio required yield and yield/point trade-off schedule currently in effect or as of a specified date/time are retrieved from a look up table stored in system 10.
[0148] Table 7 below depicts an exemplar yield/point trade-off schedule in connection with underwriting and pricing a hypothetical loan (i.e., a 30 year fixed rate mortgage with a loan principal of $87,000, a LTV of 87% and a par portfolio yield of 7.758%). In reading the schedule set forth in Table 7 starting, for example, with the first discount increment 0.125 below par (0.00), for the first 12.5 basis points in yield, the number of discount points the borrower would pay would be 0.481 points. With a discount increment of 25 basis points in yield, the number of discount points the borrower would pay would be 0.969 points. It should be recognized that the transaction data set forth in Table 7 is not fully representative of all data utilized by system 10.
[0149]
| TABLE 7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| TRANSACTION: Underwrite & Price (Input) | |||
| Application Data | This scenario is based on the following assumptions: | ||
| 30 Year Fixed Rate Mortgage (FRM) | $87,000 | ||
| UPB | |||
| 87 LTV | 45 day | ||
| closing | |||
| TRANSACTION: Underwrite & Price (Output) | |||
| 1. | CasefileID | 100000000000001 | |
| 2. | Product | 30 Year FRM | |
| 3. | Par Portfolio Yield | 7.758% | |
| 4. | Customer Price Component | 0.500% | |
| 5. | Low Down Payment | 0.375% | |
| Rate Adjustment | |||
| 6. | Yield/Point Trade-Off Schedule | ||
| Yield | Points | ||
| (0.500) | (1.786) | ||
| (0.375) | (1.355) | ||
| (0.250) | (0.914) | ||
| (0.125) | (0.462) | ||
| 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.125 | 0.481 | ||
| 0.250 | 0.969 | ||
| 0.375 | 1.465 | ||
| 0.500 | 1.968 | ||
| 0.625 | 2.475 | ||
| 7. | Maximum Schedule Interest Rate | 9.125% | |
| 8. | Maximum Number of Points | 2.475 | |
| 9. | Maximum LTV for Rate | 90% | |
| 10. | Maximum Market Interest Rate for Float | 10.625% | |
| 11. | Pricing as of Date/Time | May 22, 2000 10:00 a.m. | |
[0150] At the end of the pricing process, pricing engine 22 returns the par portfolio yield for the loan product, the customer risk-based price component, and the yield/point trade-off schedule for presentation to the potential borrower (step 308).
[0151] Desirably pricing engine 22 also generates sample interest rates that prospects or other loan originators can display to the general public (e.g., over the Internet) to entice potential borrowers to consider the loan products available through the prospect or other loan originator. Preferably, such enticement rates are customized for each prospect/loan originator and will reflect either interest rates that a “typical” borrower may expect to receive, or rates that a fictitious highly qualified borrower may expect to receive to illustrate the best interest rates that the prospect/loan originator can provide.
[0152] As interest rates change with market fluctuations, pricing engine 22 preferably generates a new set of enticement rates for each prospect/loan originator. The system has the ability to customize a “typical” borrower for each prospect/loan originator. Additionally, each prospect/loan originator can create a plurality of “typical” borrowers in order to show ranges or interest rates which may best match the characteristics of target potential borrowers.
[0153] Following the underwriting and pricing process described above, the borrower has the ability to rate lock. That is, the borrower can select a product, interest rate/point combination and a rate lock option (i.e. float or lock) online. A locked rate is fixed at the time the borrower elects or is required by the loan originator to lock.
[0154] A benefit of system 10 is that if a borrower decides to float, they can request and receive an online, up-to-the-minute interest rate quote that is unique to them. This is not a sample interest rate. Rather, it is an actual borrower/product specific “live” interest rate quote that is available to the borrower to lock in.
[0155] Also, the loan originator may initiate a request for a spot sales price for a particular loan in the system pipeline at any time after the loan has been rate locked. It should be appreciated that this enables the loan originator to value the individual loan in the secondary market without selling the loan.
[0156] Referring to FIG. 18 a, to request a spot price, the loan originator provides information to pricing engine 22 including the gross interest rate (step 600). Once the information is provided at step 600, the process proceeds to step 602 where information concerning the selected loan product, the rate lock status, the customer risk-based price component, and the sale status is retrieved by casefile ID.
[0157] The process then continues to decision 604 where pricing engine 22 verifies that the input product is the selected product. If not, an error message is generated indicating that the product does not match the selected product and the process terminates (event 606). If the input product is indeed the selected product, the process proceeds to decision 608 which queries if the loan has been sold.
[0158] If a “yes” response is returned at decision 608, an error message is generated indicating that the loan has already been sold to a secondary mortgage market purchaser, preferably, Fannie Mae (event 610). If a “no” response is given, the process moves to decision 612 which queries if the rate status is lock.
[0159] If the rate status is lock, the process moves to step 614 and a spot price is generated as described in greater detail below in connection with FIG. 18 b. If a “no” response is returned at decision 612, i.e., if the rate status is not lock (float), an error message is generated indicating that the loan must be locked in order to obtain a spot price (event 618).
[0160] At step 614, pricing engine 22 generates the spot price utilizing input data including the product, customer risk-based price component, and gross interest rate. Referring now to FIG. 18 b, pricing engine 22 retrieves the current product specific par portfolio yield from a look up table (step 700). Pricing engine 22 then retrieves the current product specific yield/point trade-off schedule (step 702).
[0161] At step 704, pricing engine 22 calculates the interest rate portfolio yield as the gross interest rate less the customer risk-based price component less other appropriate adjustments. At step 706, pricing engine 22 calculates the yield difference as the current par portfolio yield less the interest rate portfolio yield. At step 708, pricing engine 22 calculates the price difference as the yield difference multiplied by an appropriate trade-off ratio (i.e., what is paid in price for one basis point in yield). Then, the spot price is calculated as 100 minus the price difference (step 710).
[0162] Referring back to FIG. 18 a, with the spot price calculated, pricing engine 22 sets the pricing date equal to the current date (step 630) and packages the spot price and the current date as output (step 632).
[0163] To sell a loan to a secondary mortgage market purchaser in the secondary market, the loan originator initiates a sell loan transaction via pricing engine 22. Upon receiving the request, pricing engine 22 confirms that the loan originator has provided all required underwriting characteristics (e.g., casefile ID, product, and gross interest rate), and calculates the sales price for delivery to the loan originator. This necessitates that pricing engine 22 carry out the additional step of setting the acquisition price equal to the spot price (as calculated above) at the current date (i.e., the date of the acquisition).
[0164] In accordance with the foregoing, an online system and process are disclosed for enabling a potential borrower to obtain (from a prospect in the mortgage business or other loan originator) a meaningful, real time, anonymous assessment of the likelihood of being approved for a loan based on limited information provided by the potential borrower without the need for a credit report or a property appraisal. The system further provides an online, real time, firm underwriting decision on each loan product offered by the lender for which the borrower is eligible regardless of whether or not the borrower has identified actual collateral to collateralize the loan, and the opportunity to aggregate fees and closing costs with the loan principal.
[0165] The system (i) identifies available loan products (e.g., mortgage loans) to potential borrowers, (ii) underwrites and prices loan products for which such borrowers are eligible based on their specific financial and other relevant characteristics, and (iii) facilitates the sale of mortgage loans to secondary mortgage market purchasers. This is accomplished in real time over the Internet or other global communications network.
[0166] Borrower information submitted to the loan originator electronically is evaluated in real time by the system software which determines, before the actual loan application is submitted, and without the need to obtain a credit report or a collateral appraisal, how likely it is that the potential borrower's loan application will be approved. The system communicates the qualification determination to the potential borrower in the form of a useful and readily understandable percentage likelihood of approval which can be easily and meaningfully compared against determinations made with regard to other potential available loan products to permit the potential borrower to make an informed loan decision. This is not a mere affordability calculation such as is common in the art.
[0167] If the borrower chooses to apply for a loan, the system underwrites the loan product selected by the borrower as well as all other loan products offered by the lender for which the borrower is eligible. During underwriting, the system evaluates a credit report on the borrower and makes an automatic assessment of underlying collateral based, in part, on historical data stored in a database concerning the collateral (e.g., prior assessments of real estate, assessments of comparable real estate), assuming, of course, that the borrower has identified collateral. The system and process do not require the borrower to identify collateral to obtain an underwriting decision.
[0168] Assuming that collateral is identified, the system may recommend an appraisal with a full interior and exterior property inspection, an appraisal limited to an exterior-only property inspection, or no appraisal. In most cases, such automatic assessments avoid the need for an appraisal involving an interior and exterior inspection of underlying collateral, and avoid the associated cost. However, the risk associated with not performing an appraisal is factored into the loan pricing as a per loan adjustment to the interest rate. Also, during the underwriting process, the system determines the criteria for aggregating or bundling closing costs with the loan principal.
[0169] In the event that the borrower is not approved for any loans during the underwriting process, the lender is provided with information identifying problem areas with respect to the borrower's loan application and suggested areas for improving the borrower's chances for approval. The borrower may be referred to a help center to receive the benefit of such information and suggestions.
[0170] The system calculates interest rate quotes (i.e., percentage interest rates and points) for presentation by the lender to the borrower for all loan products offered by the lender for which the borrower is approved during underwriting. The calculated interest rate quotes are customized to the borrower based on the specific financial profile and other relevant characteristics of the particular borrower (drawn from the information provided by the potential borrower and by the credit report and other information obtained by the system), and on the credit risk to the loan originator and secondary mortgage market participant posed by the borrower.
[0171] Following underwriting and pricing, the borrower may fix or lock in an interest rate and points, or the borrower may choose to float. If the borrower decides to float, the borrower can request and receive an online, up-to-the-minute interest rate quote that is customized to the borrower.
[0172] After the borrower has selected a particular loan option, the information provided by the borrower in applying for the loan (e.g., employment information, credit history, collateral information, etc.) is verified by the loan originator. The verification process may require human participation. For example, in the case of a mortgage loan, the credit report on the borrower may require review, or the loan originator might arrange at least for a cursory exterior-only inspection of the underlying real estate.
[0173] Additionally, the system and process determine the spot price for a loan. The spot price is the price that the loan originator may expect to receive in the secondary mortgage market when it sells the loan to a secondary mortgage market purchaser. The spot price allows the loan originator to value a loan in the secondary market without committing (selling) the loan. After the loan is closed, the lender can commit (sell) the loan to the secondary mortgage market purchaser at a price determined by the system and process disclosed herein.
[0174] The system utilizes known computer hardware and electronic communications links to effect the automated implementation of various aspects of the disclosed methods.
[0175] Accordingly, the system and process provide for online loan qualification, application, approval, underwriting and pricing, and enable non-traditional players (“prospects”) and traditional players to originate loans without having to build the requisite infrastructure. On the lender side, the system and process provide prospects in the mortgage business, or other loan originators, with market sensitive interest rates that may be presented to potential borrowers to attract business. These rates may be customized for each prospect or other lender.
[0176] The system and process provide a streamlined loan process to provide a positive experience for users.
[0177] The system and process give a potential borrower a meaningful and readily understandable assessment of the likelihood of being approved for a loan in real time, without the need for a credit report or a collateral appraisal.
[0178] The system and process provide a borrower with an online, real time, firm underwriting decision on each loan product offered by the lender for which the borrower is eligible regardless of whether or not the borrower has identified actual collateral for the loan.
[0179] The system and process provide a borrower with the opportunity to aggregate closing costs with the loan principal.
[0180] The system and process calculate an interest rate and points specific to the individual potential borrower based on the credit risk to the lender and the secondary mortgage market purchaser posed by the borrower in connection with a specific loan product for which the borrower is eligible.
[0181] The system and process provide for reduced loan origination costs resulting from requiring only limited appraisal field work or no appraisal field work, as appropriate.
[0182] The loan system and process provide reduced documentation verification requirements.
[0183] Additionally, the system and process minimize the uncertainty faced by the loan originator when dealing with the secondary mortgage market by providing the loan originator with the acquisition price it may expect to receive for an individual loan (not an aggregate of loans) in the secondary market from the secondary mortgage market purchaser. The system and process offer the loan originator an indication of the price it may expect to receive for an individual loan in the secondary mortgage market from the secondary mortgage market purchaser.
[0184] The system and process look up predefined factors so that the calculations required are simpler and the hardware requirements are decreased.
[0185] The disclosed method accordingly comprises the various steps and the relation of one or more of such steps with respect to each of the others, and the disclosed system embodies features of construction, combinations of elements, and arrangement of parts which are adapted to effect such steps, all as exemplified in the foregoing detailed disclosure.
[0186] It will thus be seen that the advantages set forth above, among those made apparent from the preceding description, are efficiently attained and, since certain changes may be made in carrying out the above method and in the constructions set forth for the system without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
[0187] It is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein described, and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A computer implemented data processing method comprising:
identifying, at a computer server, a single mortgage loan for a sale of the single mortgage loan from a loan originator to a secondary mortgage market purchaser;
calculating, at a computer server, a price for the identified single mortgage loan for the sale of the identified single mortgage loan from the loan originator to the secondary mortgage market purchaser, the price being for the identified single mortgage loan individually and not as part of an aggregation of loans, wherein the price is calculated prior to closing of the identified single mortgage loan based on mortgage loan application data for a borrower associated with the identified single mortgage loan, the mortgage loan application data including at least one of credit characteristics of the borrower and a loan-to-value ratio;
generating, at the computer server, screen displays for presentation to an operator of a remote computer, the screen displays being transmitted from the computer server to the remote computer via a global computing network;
causing, using the computer server, the price to be presented to the loan originator via the screen displays prior to closing the identified single mortgage loan; and
receiving, at the computer server, operator input from the operator of the remote computer via the global computing network, the operator input including a commitment from the loan originator, based at least in part on the presented price, for the sale of the identified single mortgage loan to the secondary mortgage market purchaser.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the screen displays include one or more screen displays configured to display the mortgage loan application data to the operator.
3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the screen displays include one or more screen displays configured to receive the mortgage loan application data from the operator.
4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the screen displays include one or more screen displays configured to receive an on-line rate lock of an interest rate for the identified single mortgage loan for the borrower.
5. A method according to claim 4, further comprising building, at the computer server, credit enhancement fees into the interest rate.
6. A method according to claim 5, further comprising adjusting, at the computer server, the interest rate for an approved mortgage loan where a loan-to-value (LTV) percentage associated with the borrower exceeds a predetermined limit, wherein the adjustment to the interest rate corresponds to a credit enhancement fee that compensates for increased potential default associated with a lower down payment.
7. A method according to claim 1, further comprising evaluating, at the computer server, the mortgage loan application data based on a set of underwriting guidelines of the secondary mortgage market purchaser.
8. A method according to claim 7, further comprising generating, at the computer server, recommendations for the identified single mortgage loan based on the evaluation.
9. A method according to claim 8, further comprising identifying, at the computer server, problems with a loan application associated with the identified single mortgage loan.
10. A method according to claim 7, wherein the mortgage loan application data is evaluated based on a set of underwriting guidelines of the loan originator.
11. A method according to claim 1, wherein the price is further calculated based on a product type of the identified single mortgage loan.
12. A method according to claim 1, wherein the global communication network is the Internet, and wherein the one or more screen displays are one or more web pages.
13. A method according to claim 1, further comprising aggregating, at the computer server, lender closing costs into a loan principal associated with the identified single mortgage loan.
14. A method according to claim 1, further comprising determining, at the computer server, a likelihood that the borrower will qualify for a mortgage loan product.
15. A method according to claim 1, further comprising obtaining, at the computer server, a credit report concerning the borrower.
16. A method according to claim 15, wherein the screen displays include one or more screen displays configured to present real estate tradelines associated with the borrower from the credit report for review, wherein the operator input includes confirmation or correction information associated with the presented real estate tradelines for the borrower.
17. A method according to claim 16, wherein the tradelines comprise outstanding mortgages.
18. A method according to claim 17, wherein the outstanding mortgages comprise home equity loans.
19. A method according to claim 16, wherein the screen displays include one or more screen displays configured to provide tradelines information to the loan originator.
20. A computer implemented data processing method comprising:
identifying, at a computer server, a single mortgage loan for a sale of the single mortgage loan from a loan originator to a secondary mortgage market purchaser;
generating, at a computer server, a price for the identified single mortgage loan for the sale of the identified single mortgage loan from the loan originator to the secondary mortgage market purchaser, the price being for the identified single mortgage loan individually and not as part of an aggregation of loans, wherein the price is calculated prior to closing of the identified single mortgage loan based on mortgage loan application data for a borrower associated with the identified single mortgage loan, the mortgage loan application data including at least one of credit characteristics of the borrower and a loan-to-value ratio;
generating, at the computer server, screen displays for presentation to an operator of a remote computer, the screen displays being transmitted from the computer server to the remote computer via a global computing network;
causing, using the computer server, the price to be presented to the loan originator via the screen displays prior to closing the identified single mortgage loan;
receiving, at the computer server, operator input from the operator of the remote computer via the global computing network, the operator input including a commitment from the loan originator, based at least in part on the presented price, for the sale of the identified single mortgage loan to the secondary mortgage market purchaser;
receiving, at the computer server, an additional operator input from the operator of the remote computer via the global computing network, the additional operator input including an indication that the loan originator has closed the identified single mortgage loan, the indication that the loan originator has closed the identified single mortgage loan being received after the price is presented to the loan originator; and
using the computer server to purchase the identified single mortgage loan from the loan originator at the price generated prior to closing of the identified single mortgage loan.
21. A method according to claim 20, further comprising evaluating, at the computer server, the mortgage loan application data based on a set of underwriting guidelines of the secondary mortgage market purchaser.
22. A method according to claim 20, wherein the price is further calculated based on a product type of the identified single mortgage loan.
23. A method according to claim 20, wherein the global communication network is the Internet, and wherein the one or more screen displays are one or more web pages.
24. A method according to claim 20, wherein the screen displays include one or more screen displays configured to receive an on-line rate lock of an interest rate for the identified single mortgage loan for the borrower.
25. A computer implemented data processing method comprising:
identifying, at a computer server, a single mortgage loan for a sale of the single mortgage loan from a loan originator to a secondary mortgage market purchaser;
calculating, at a computer server, a price for the identified single mortgage loan for the sale of the identified single mortgage loan from the loan originator to the secondary mortgage market purchaser, the price being for the identified single mortgage loan individually and not as part of an aggregation of loans, wherein the price is calculated prior to closing of the identified single mortgage loan based on mortgage loan application data for a borrower associated with the identified single mortgage loan, the mortgage loan application data including at least one of credit characteristics of the borrower and a loan-to-value ratio;
generating, at the computer server, screen displays for presentation to an operator of a remote computer, the screen displays being transmitted from the computer server to the remote computer via a global computing network;
causing, using the computer server, the mortgage loan application data to be presented to the operator via the screen displays prior to closing the identified single mortgage loan;
causing, using the computer server, the price to be presented to the loan originator via the screen displays prior to closing the identified single mortgage loan; and
receiving, at the computer server, operator input from the operator of the remote computer via the global computing network, the operator input including mortgage loan application data from the operator, the operator input further including a commitment from the loan originator, based at least in part on the presented price, for the sale of the identified single mortgage loan to the secondary mortgage market purchaser.
Patent Citations (179)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3316395(A) | 1967-04-01 | Lavin | Applicant |
| US4876648(A) | 1989-10-01 | Lloyd | Applicant |
| US4879648(A) | 1989-11-01 | Cochran et al. | Applicant |
| US5239462(A) | 1993-08-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US5262941(A) | 1993-11-01 | Saladin et al. | Applicant |
| US5274547(A) | 1993-12-01 | Zoffel et al. | Applicant |
| US5323315(A) | 1994-06-01 | Highbloom | Applicant |
| US5361201(A) | 1994-11-01 | Jost et al. | Applicant |
| US5414621(A) | 1995-05-01 | Hough | Applicant |
| US5537315(A) | 1996-07-01 | Mitcham | Applicant |
| US5563783(A) | 1996-10-01 | Stolfo et al. | Applicant |
| US5611052(A) | 1997-03-01 | Dykstra et al. | Applicant |
| US5615268(A) | 1997-03-01 | Bisbee et al. | Applicant |
| US5689649(A) | 1997-11-01 | Altman et al. | Applicant |
| US5696907(A) | 1997-12-01 | Tom | Applicant |
| US5699527(A) | 1997-12-01 | Davidson | Applicant |
| US5732400(A) | 1998-03-01 | Mandler et al. | Applicant |
| US5765144(A) | 1998-06-01 | Larche et al. | Applicant |
| US5797133(A) | 1998-08-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US5870721(A) | 1999-02-01 | Norris | Applicant |
| US5878403(A) | 1999-03-01 | DeFrancesco et al. | Applicant |
| US5878404(A) | 1999-03-01 | Stout, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5930775(A) | 1999-07-01 | McCauley et al. | Applicant |
| US5930776(A) | 1999-07-01 | Dykstra et al. | Applicant |
| US5940811(A) | 1999-08-01 | Norris | Applicant |
| US5940812(A) | 1999-08-01 | Tengel et al. | Applicant |
| US5966699(A) | 1999-10-01 | Zandi | Applicant |
| US5966700(A) | 1999-10-01 | Gould et al. | Applicant |
| US5970464(A) | 1999-10-01 | Apte et al. | Applicant |
| US5974372(A) | 1999-10-01 | Barnes et al. | Applicant |
| US5983206(A) | 1999-11-01 | Oppenheimer | Applicant |
| US5995947(A) | 1999-11-01 | Fraser et al. | Applicant |
| US6014645(A) | 2000-01-01 | Cunningham | Applicant |
| US6021202(A) | 2000-02-01 | Anderson et al. | Applicant |
| US6029149(A) | 2000-02-01 | Dystra et al. | Applicant |
| US6035288(A) | 2000-03-01 | Solomon | Applicant |
| US6044362(A) | 2000-03-01 | Neely | Applicant |
| US6070151(A) | 2000-05-01 | Frankel | Applicant |
| US6076070(A) | 2000-06-01 | Stack | Applicant |
| US6088686(A) | 2000-07-01 | Walker et al. | Applicant |
| US6105007(A) | 2000-08-01 | Norris | Applicant |
| US6112190(A) | 2000-08-01 | Fletcher et al. | Applicant |
| US6119103(A) | 2000-09-01 | Basch et al. | Applicant |
| US6125349(A) | 2000-09-01 | Maher | Applicant |
| US6144948(A) | 2000-11-01 | Walker et al. | Applicant |
| US6202053(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Christiansen et al. | Applicant |
| US6226624(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Watson et al. | Applicant |
| US6233566(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Levine et al. | Applicant |
| US6289319(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Lockwood | Applicant |
| US6304858(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Mosler et al. | Applicant |
| US6311169(B2) | 2001-10-01 | Duhon | Applicant |
| US6324526(B1) | 2001-11-01 | D'Agostino | Applicant |
| US6367013(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Bisbee et al. | Applicant |
| US6385594(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Lebda et al. | Applicant |
| US6401070(B1) | 2002-06-01 | McManus et al. | Applicant |
| US6405101(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Johanson et al. | Applicant |
| US6405181(B2) | 2002-06-01 | Lent et al. | Applicant |
| US6430539(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Lazarus et al. | Applicant |
| US6438526(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Dykes et al. | Applicant |
| US6505176(B2) | 2003-01-01 | DeFrancesco, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US6513018(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Culhane | Applicant |
| US6532450(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US6584467(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Haught et al. | Applicant |
| US6594635(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Erlanger | Applicant |
| US6609109(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Bradley et al. | Applicant |
| US6611816(B2) | 2003-08-01 | Lebda et al. | Applicant |
| US6651884(B2) | 2003-11-01 | Predergast et al. | Applicant |
| US6671673(B1) | 2003-12-01 | Baseman et al. | Applicant |
| US6823319(B1) | 2004-11-01 | Lynch et al. | Applicant |
| US6985886(B1) | 2006-01-01 | Broadbent et al. | Applicant |
| US6988082(B1) | 2006-01-01 | Williams et al. | Applicant |
| US7089503(B1) | 2006-08-01 | Bloomquist et al. | Applicant |
| US7107241(B1) | 2006-09-01 | Pinto | Applicant |
| US7146337(B1) | 2006-12-01 | Ward et al. | Applicant |
| US7310618(B2) | 2007-12-01 | Libman | Applicant |
| US7315841(B1) | 2008-01-01 | McDonald et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0029482(A1) | 2001-10-01 | Tealdi et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0032178(A1) | 2001-10-01 | Adams et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0037287(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Broadbent et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0042035(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Kelly et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0019804(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Sutton | Applicant |
| US2002/0023051(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Kunzle et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0029154(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Majoor | Applicant |
| US2002/0029194(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Lewis et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0032635(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Harris et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0035520(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Weiss | Applicant |
| US2002/0038318(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Cochran et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0040339(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Dhar et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0052815(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0052835(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Toscano | Applicant |
| US2002/0059137(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Freeman et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0077968(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Kaniwa et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0087364(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Lerner et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0087389(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Sklarz et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0091550(A1) | 2002-07-01 | White et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0091630(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Inoue | Applicant |
| US2002/0099650(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Cole | Applicant |
| US2002/0111835(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Hele et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0111901(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Whitney | Applicant |
| US2002/0138414(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Baker, IV | Applicant |
| US2002/0152155(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Greenwood et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0152165(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Dutta et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0152170(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Dutta et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0018558(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Heffner et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0023610(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Bove et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0028478(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Kinney et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0033241(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Harari | Applicant |
| US2003/0033242(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Lynch et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0036994(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Witzig et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0036995(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Lazerson | Applicant |
| US2003/0036996(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Lazerson | Applicant |
| US2003/0046223(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Crawford et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0055778(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Erlanger | Applicant |
| US2003/0065614(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Sweeney | Applicant |
| US2003/0093366(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Halper et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0110249(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Buus et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0144949(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Blanch | Applicant |
| US2003/0149658(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Rossbach et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0167191(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Slabonik et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0172025(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Gallina | Applicant |
| US2003/0177032(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Bonissone et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0182159(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Bonissone et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0187696(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Bonissone et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0187697(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Bonissone et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0187698(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Bonissone et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0187699(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Bonissone et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0187700(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Bonissone et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0187701(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Bonissone et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0187702(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Bonissone et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0208385(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Zander et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0212654(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Harper et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0217034(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Shutt | Applicant |
| US2003/0220879(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Gaughan et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0225662(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Horan et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0229553(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Kongyingyong et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0229581(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Green et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0233260(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Snell et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0233316(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Hu et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0002915(A1) | 2004-01-01 | McDonald et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0019517(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Sennott | Applicant |
| US2004/0030616(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Florance et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0030649(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Nelson et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0034592(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Hu et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0049439(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Johnston et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0049445(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Kishore | Applicant |
| US2004/0059653(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Verkuylen et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0064402(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Dreyer et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0107161(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Tanaka et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0122717(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Handcock | Applicant |
| US2005/0289046(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Conyack, Jr. | Examiner |
| JP4182868 | 1992-06-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2002007701 | 2002-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2002259696 | 2002-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2002288426 | 2002-10-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2003223559 | 2003-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO9948036 | 1999-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO21011 | 2000-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO62209 | 2000-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO75833 | 2000-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO116845 | 2001-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO118718 | 2001-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/27832 | 2001-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO133461 | 2001-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO139079 | 2001-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/41019 | 2001-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO150318 | 2001-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO163445 | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO163446 | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO163534 | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO180123 | 2001-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO198999 | 2001-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2/06989 | 2002-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO208855 | 2002-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO223443 | 2002-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2/084925 | 2002-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2093286 | 2002-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO3009152 | 2003-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO3/071380 | 2003-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO3/071388 | 2003-08-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (38)
- Fannie Mae, “Servicing Guide”, 1995-2002 et al, 318 pages, Forward, Table of Contents, Sections III, IX, X, and XI, Fannie Mae, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Selling”, 1995-2002 et al, 1119 pgs, Fannie Mae, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Guide to Underwriting with Desktop Underwriter®”, Sep. 2002; 63 pgs.Applicant
- Edocs, “edocs Teams with Fannie Mae to Offer Lenders Online Account Management Solution,” Press Release, Mar. 12, 2001, 2 pgs., edocs, Inc., USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Fannie Mae Unveils MORNETPlus on the Web; Lenders Can Now Access Automated Underwriting and Other Mortgage Transaction Services on Fanniemae.com,” Press Release, Mar. 23, 2000, 2 pgs., Fannie Mae, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Fannie Mae Announces MORNETPlus Connections; Now Provides Lenders with Access to the Largest Network of Service Providers on the Web for Appraisals, Flood Certificates, Title Insurance and Closing, and Escrow Services,” Press Release, Apr. 18, 2001, 3 pgs., Fannie Mae, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Fannie Mae and First American Financial to Provide Lenders with Electronic Access to More Products on MORNETPlus Network; Appraisals, Flood Certificates, and Title Insurance in Offering,” Press Release, Dec. 21, 1999, 2 pgs, Fannie Mae, USA.Applicant
- Raines Franklin D., “Statement by Franklin D. Raines Chairman and CEO of Fannie Mae, Speech at 2003 Fannie Mae eBusiness Forum,” Sep. 17, 2003, 6 pgs, Fannie Mae, USA.Applicant
- Object Management Group, “Fannie Mae”, CORBA Banking/Finance, Sep. 17, 2001, 2 pgs, Object Management Group, Needham, MA, USA.Applicant
- Smith Tom,“E-Commerce Holds Keys to Home Ownership: Fannie Mae drives hug volumes of mortgage business to its e-marketplace,” Internetweek.com, Undated, 5 pgs., Internetweek.com, USA.Applicant
- Smith Tom , “Fannie Mae Ramps up Web Apps: Q&A with Julie St. John , Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Office and Michael Williams President of Fannie Mae e-Business,” Internetweek.com, Undated, 11 pgs., Internetweek.com, USA.Applicant
- Sun, “Success on Sun: Software Development Case Study Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae),” Mar. 1995, 10 pgs, Sun, USA.Applicant
- Raines Franklin D., “Speech by Franklin D. Raines Chairman and CEO of Fannie Mae, Fannie Mae and the Mortgage Industry in the E-Commerce Age,” May 8, 2000, 20 pgs., Fannie Mae, USA.Applicant
- Williams Michael, “Technology and Other Keys to the Boom in Refinancing,” American Banker, Apr. 20, 2003, 3 pgs, vol. 168, Issue 63, p. 8., American Banker USA.Applicant
- Breakthroughs in Mortgage Banking: Looking Toward the Future, Real Estate Finance Press, Mortgage Bankers Association of America, 1996, pp. 5-1-5-8, ISBN 1-57599-016-4, Jess Lderman, Editor.Applicant
- REASA Real Estate Automated Service Associates, LLC website materials (www.reasa.com).Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Delivering Loans for MBS”, 1996, 138 pages, Fannie Mae, Washington, DC, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Guide to Underwriting with Desktop Underwriter”, Oct. 1997, 152 pages, Verison 4.0, Fannie Mae, Washington, DC, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “MORNET MBS Pool Submission System User's Guide”, Sep. 1998, 259 pages, Version 5.3, Fannie Mae, Washington, DC, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Making Good Delivery A Guide to Delivering Loans for Cash and MBS”, 1994, 121 pages, Fannie Mae, Washington, DC, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “MORNET Cash Delivery System User's Guide”, Nov. 1997, 177 pages, Version 2.6, Fannie Mae, Washington, DC, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Delivering Loans for Cash”, 1997, 96 pages, Fannie Mae, Washington, DC, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “MORNET Manager User's Guide”, Nov. 1998, 187 pages, Version 3.0, Fannie Mae, Washington, DC, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “MORNET Servicing Support System User's Guide”, Dec. 1998, 370 pages, Fannie Mae, Washington, DC, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Selling”, Jun. 30, 2002, 168 pgs, Fannie Mae, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Investor Accounting: Cash”, 1996, 132 pages, Fannie Mae, Washington, DC, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “Secondary Marketing: Cash”, 1997, 81 pages, Fannie Mae, USA.Applicant
- Fannie Mae, “General Servicing Fundamentals”, 1996, 188 pages, Fannie Mae, USA.Applicant
- Laser Overview, May 1993, chapters 1-18.Applicant
- E-Loan; Qualify For a Loan, Pre-Qualifying Interview website materials Feb. 1, 1999, http://e-loan.com/cgi-bin (5 pgs.).Applicant
- Home Shark Loan Application website materials Feb. 1, 1999, https://loanforms.homeshark.com/secure (15 pgs.).Applicant
- Home Shark Prequalification website materials Feb. 1, 1999, https://loanforms.homeshark.com/secure/CAnalysis (3 pgs.).Applicant
- iQualify.com; Loan Application website materials Feb. 1, 1999, http://secure01.iqualify.com/scripts/prodselectupd (14 pgs.).Applicant
- LendingTree, Mortgage, Apply Online website materials Feb. 1, 1999, https://loans./lendingtree.com (7 pgs.).Applicant
- Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/491,000, dated May 14, 2009 (3 pgs.).Applicant
- Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/491,000, dated Jan. 26, 2009 (26 pgs.).Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/491,000, dated Aug. 5, 2008 (29 pgs.).Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/805,410, dated Sep. 28, 2009 (13 pgs.).Applicant