US 7,702,624 B2Grant

Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document

Issue Date:2010-04-20

•13 Claims

•12 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

A facility for navigating an electronic document is described. The facility receives user input selecting a portion of the content of a rendered document that constitutes a sentence fragment. In response to receiving the user input, the facility identifies an electronic document contained in a corpus of electronic documents, the identified electronic document containing the selected document portion. In response to receiving the user input, the facility further identifies a position within the identified electronic document at which the selected document portion occurs.

Metadata

Assignee

Exbiblio, B.V.

Inventors

Martin T. King
Clifford A. Kushler
James Q. Stafford-Fraser
Dale L. Grover

Application Information

Application Number:US 11/110,353

Filing Date:2005-04-19

Priority Date:2004-04-19

Art Unit:2163

Classifications

IPC:

G06F17/30

Patent Drawings (12 sheets)

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001] This application is a Continuation-In-Part of the following, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/004,637 filed on Dec. 3, 2004, the following U.S. patent applications, each filed on Apr. 1, 2005: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,961, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR INITIATING APPLICATION PROCESSES BY DATA CAPTURE FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,093, now abandoned entitled DETERMINING ACTIONS INVOLVING CAPTURED INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC CONTENT ASSOCIATED WITH RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,038, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,599,844 entitled CONTENT ACCESS WITH HANDHELD DOCUMENT DATA CAPTURE DEVICES, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,014, entitled SEARCH ENGINES AND SYSTEMS WITH HANDHELD DOCUMENT DATA CAPTURE DEVICES, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,103, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,596,269 entitled TRIGGERING ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO OPTICALLY OR ACOUSTICALLY CAPTURING KEYWORDS FROM A RENDERED DOCUMENT, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,043, entitled SEARCHING AND ACCESSING DOCUMENTS ON PRIVATE NETWORKS FOR USE WITH CAPTURES FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,981, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,606,741 entitled INFORMATION GATHERING SYSTEM AND METHOD, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,089, entitled DOCUMENT ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,835, entitled PUBLISHING TECHNIQUES FOR ADDING VALUE TO A RENDERED DOCUMENT, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,016, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,421,155 entitled ARCHIVE OF TEXT CAPTURES FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,828, entitled ADDING INFORMATION OR FUNCTIONALITY TO A RENDERED DOCUMENT VIA ASSOCIATION WITH AN ELECTRONIC COUNTERPART, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,833, entitled AGGREGATE ANALYSIS OF TEXT CAPTURES PERFORMED BY MULTIPLE USERS FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,836, entitled ESTABLISHING AN INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENT FOR RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,042. now U.S. Pat. No. 7,593,605 entitled DATA CAPTURE FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS USING HANDHELD DEVICE, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/096,704, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,599,580 entitled CAPTURING TEXT FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS USING SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION.

[0002] This application claims priority to, and incorporates by reference in their entirety, the following U.S. Provisional Patent Applications: Application No. 60/563,520 filed on Apr. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/563,485 filed on Apr. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/564,688 filed on Apr. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/564,846 filed on Apr. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/566,667 filed on Apr. 30, 2004, Application No. 60/571,381 filed on May 14, 2004, Application No. 60/571,560 filed on May 14, 2004, Application No. 60/571,715 filed on May 17, 2004, Application No. 60/589,203 filed on Jul. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/589,201 filed on Jul. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/589,202 filed on Jul. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/598,821 filed on Aug. 2, 2004, Application No. 60/602,956 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,925 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,947 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,897 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,896 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,930 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,898 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/603,466 filed on Aug. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/603,082 filed on Aug. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/603,081 filed on Aug. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/603,498 filed on Aug. 20, 2004, Application No. 60/603,358 filed on Aug. 20, 2004, Application No. 60/604,103 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/604,098 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/604,100 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/604,102 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/605,229 filed on Aug. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/605,105 filed on Aug. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,243 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,628 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,632 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,589 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,242 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,602 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,340 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,634 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,461 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,455 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,460 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,400 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,456 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,341 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,361 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,454 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,339 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,633 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/615,378 filed on Oct. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/615,112 filed on Oct. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/615,538 filed on Oct. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/617,122 filed on Oct. 7, 2004, Application No. 60/622,906 filed on Oct. 28, 2004, Application No. 60/633,452 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/633,678 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/633,486 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/633,453 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/634,627 filed on Dec. 9, 2004, Application No. 60/634,739 filed on Dec. 9, 2004, Application No. 60/647,684 filed on Jan. 26, 2005, Application No. 60/648,746 filed on Jan. 31, 2005, Application No. 60/653,372 filed on Feb. 15, 2005, Application No. 60/653,663 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,669 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,899 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,679 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,847 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/654,379 filed on Feb. 17, 2005, Application No. 60/654,368 filed on Feb. 18, 2005, Application No. 60/654,326 filed on Feb. 18, 2005, Application No. 60/654,196 filed on Feb. 18, 2005, Application No. 60/655,279 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,280 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,987 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,697 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,281 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, and Application No. 60/657,309 filed on Feb. 28, 2005.

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0003] The described technology is directed to the field of document processing.

BACKGROUND

[0004] Paper documents have an enduring appeal, as can be seen by the proliferation of paper documents in the computer age. It has never been easier to print and publish paper documents than it is today. Paper documents prevail even though electronic documents are easier to duplicate, transmit, search and edit.

[0005] Given the popularity of paper documents and the advantages of electronic documents, it would be useful to combine the benefits of both.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0006] FIG. 1 is a data flow diagram that illustrates the flow of information in one embodiment of the core system.

[0007] FIG. 2 is a component diagram of components included in a typical implementation of the system in the context of a typical operating environment.

[0008] FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a scanner.

[0009] FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the typical environment in which embodiments of the system operate.

[0010] FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to implement bookmarks.

[0011] FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a scanning device that has an integrated highlighter and pen.

[0012] FIG. 7 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to process text capture actions.

[0013] FIGS. 8A-8D illustrate how two characters of an alphabet often have approximately the same *relative* shape in multiple fonts.

[0014] FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates the approach used by the facility in some embodiments to learn an entirely new set of symbols using self recognition.

[0015] FIG. 10 is a diagram that shows a subset of the symbols shown in FIG. 9 that self-define their vertical and horizontal extent.

[0016] FIG. 11 is a diagram that shows relationships between some of the symbols shown in FIG. 9.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Overview

[0017] A system for interpreting and interacting with rendered documents (e.g., printed or displayed documents), and related digital “source,” “counterpart,” or “reference” versions of these documents (“the system”) is described. In some embodiments, the system is not directly concerned with recognizing and interpreting characters per se; it does not concern itself with recognizing and understanding printed characters, though it may in some cases perform this function. Rather, the system assumes that a version of the document is already known, that machine-readable (e.g., ASCII or some other machine-readable text) source or reference version document is at hand, or is machine-accessible, or will be made available in the future. The system uses various features (including text) in rendered documents for navigation (i.e., determining location within a document). The location is in turn used to enable a rich set of user functions and interactions, some of which will be described below.

[0018] The system is based in part on the process of interpreting and deciphering the patterns of marks (e.g., the text and any rendered supplemental informational marks) in documents to determine location information. In various embodiments, this location information is with reference to the document itself—e.g., location within the document, often down to a single paragraph, sentence, word and even single character. However, in cases where the physical lay-out of a specific rendering of a document is also known, the location information can be converted to location on a display screen, a printed page, etc.

[0019] In discussing various embodiments of the system, the term “printed text” is employed. “Printed” is used in its generic sense to documents rendering in any form that is readable to a human (e.g., on paper, on a display screen, in Braille format, etc.). It should be understood that in many cases various of the features and applications of system apply quite well to non-alphanumeric rendered content—such as punctuation, graphics and images, special marks, etc. Embodiments of the system include these additional uses.

Part I—Introduction

1. Nature of the System

[0020] For every paper document that has an electronic counterpart, there exists a discrete amount of information in the paper document that can identify the electronic counterpart. In some embodiments, the system uses a sample of text captured from a paper document, for example using a handheld scanner, to identify and locate an electronic counterpart of the document. In most cases, the amount of text needed by the facility is very small in that a few words of text from a document can often function as an identifier for the paper document and as a link to its electronic counterpart. In addition, the system may use those few words to identify not only the document, but also a location within the document.

[0021] Thus, paper documents and their digital counterparts can be associated in many useful ways using the system discussed herein.

[0022] 1.1. A Quick Overview of the Future

[0023] Once the system has associated a piece of text in a paper document with a particular digital entity has been established, the system is able to build a huge amount of functionality on that association.

[0024] It is increasingly the case that most paper documents have an electronic counterpart that is accessible on the World Wide Web or from some other online database or document corpus, or can be made accessible, such as in response to the payment of a fee or subscription. At the simplest level, then, when a user scans a few words in a paper document, the system can retrieve that electronic document or some part of it, or display it, email it to somebody, purchase it, print it or post it to a web page. As additional examples, scanning a few words of a book that a person is reading over breakfast could cause the audio-book version in the person's car to begin reading from that point when s/he starts driving to work, or scanning the serial number on a printer cartridge could begin the process of ordering a replacement.

[0025] The system implements these and many other examples of “paper/digital integration” without requiring changes to the current processes of writing, printing and publishing documents, giving such conventional rendered documents a whole new layer of digital functionality.

[0026] 1.2. Terminology

[0027] A typical use of the system begins with using an optical scanner to scan text from a paper document, but it is important to note that other methods of capture from other types of document are equally applicable. The system is therefore sometimes described as scanning or capturing text from a rendered document, where those terms are defined as follows:

[0028] A rendered document is a printed document or a document shown on a display or monitor. It is a document that is perceptible to a human, whether in permanent form or on a transitory display.

[0029] Scanning or capturing is the process of systematic examination to obtain information from a rendered document. The process may involve optical capture using a scanner or camera (for example a camera in a cellphone), or it may involve reading aloud from the document into an audio capture device or typing it on a keypad or keyboard. For more examples, see Section 15.

2. Introduction to the System

[0030] This section describes some of the devices, processes and systems that constitute a system for paper/digital integration. In various embodiments, the system builds a wide variety of services and applications on this underlying core that provides the basic functionality.

[0031] 2.1. The Processes

[0032] FIG. 1 is a data flow diagram that illustrates the flow of information in one embodiment of the core system. Other embodiments may not use all of the stages or elements illustrated here, while some will use many more.

[0033] Text from a rendered document is captured 100, typically in optical form by an optical scanner or audio form by a voice recorder, and this image or sound data is then processed 102, for example to remove artifacts of the capture process or to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. A recognition process 104 such as OCR, speech recognition, or autocorrelation then converts the data into a signature, comprised in some embodiments of text, text offsets, or other symbols. Alternatively, the system performs an alternate form of extracting document signature from the rendered document. The signature represents a set of possible text transcriptions in some embodiments. This process may be influenced by feedback from other stages, for example, if the search process and context analysis 110 have identified some candidate documents from which the capture may originate, thus narrowing the possible interpretations of the original capture.

[0034] A post-processing 106 stage may take the output of the recognition process and filter it or perform such other operations upon it as may be useful. Depending upon the embodiment implemented, it may be possible at this stage to deduce some direct actions 107 to be taken immediately without reference to the later stages, such as where a phrase or symbol has been captured which contains sufficient information in itself to convey the user's intent. In these cases no digital counterpart document need be referenced, or even known to the system.

[0035] Typically, however, the next stage will be to construct a query 108 or a set of queries for use in searching. Some aspects of the query construction may depend on the search process used and so cannot be performed until the next stage, but there will typically be some operations, such as the removal of obviously misrecognized or irrelevant characters, which can be performed in advance.

[0036] The query or queries are then passed to the search and context analysis stage 110. Here, the system optionally attempts to identify the document from which the original data was captured. To do so, the system typically uses search indices and search engines 112, knowledge about the user 114 and knowledge about the user's context or the context in which the capture occurred 116. Search engine 112 may employ and/or index information specifically about rendered documents, about their digital counterpart documents, and about documents that have a web (internet) presence). It may write to, as well as read from, many of these sources and, as has been mentioned, it may feed information into other stages of the process, for example by giving the recognition system 104 information about the language, font, rendering and likely next words based on its knowledge of the candidate documents.

[0037] In some circumstances the next stage will be to retrieve 120 a copy of the document or documents that have been identified. The sources of the documents 124 may be directly accessible, for example from a local filing system or database or a web server, or they may need to be contacted via some access service 122 which might enforce authentication, security or payment or may provide other services such as conversion of the document into a desired format.

[0038] Applications of the system may take advantage of the association of extra functionality or data with part or all of a document. For example, advertising applications discussed in Section 10.4 may use an association of particular advertising messages or subjects with portions of a document. This extra associated functionality or data can be thought of as one or more overlays on the document, and is referred to herein as “markup.” The next stage of the process 130, then, is to identify any markup relevant to the captured data. Such markup may be provided by the user, the originator, or publisher of the document, or some other party, and may be directly accessible from some source 132 or may be generated by some service 134. In various embodiments, markup can be associated with, and apply to, a rendered document and/or the digital counterpart to a rendered document, or to groups of either or both of these documents.

[0039] Lastly, as a result of the earlier stages, some actions may be taken 140. These may be default actions such as simply recording the information found, they may be dependent on the data or document, or they may be derived from the markup analysis. Sometimes the action will simply be to pass the data to another system. In some cases the various possible actions appropriate to a capture at a specific point in a rendered document will be presented to the user as a menu on an associated display, for example on a local display 332, on a computer display 212 or a mobile phone or PDA display 216. If the user doesn't respond to the menu, the default actions can be taken.

[0040] 2.2. The Components

[0041] FIG. 2 is a component diagram of components included in a typical implementation of the system in the context of a typical operating environment. As illustrated, the operating environment includes one or more optical scanning capture devices 202 or voice capture devices 204. In some embodiments, the same device performs both functions. Each capture device is able to communicate with other parts of the system such as a computer 212 and a mobile station 216 (e.g., a mobile phone or PDA) using either a direct wired or wireless connection, or through the network 220, with which it can communicate using a wired or wireless connection, the latter typically involving a wireless base station 214. In some embodiments, the capture device is integrated in the mobile station, and optionally shares some of the audio and/or optical components used in the device for voice communications and picture-taking.

[0042] Computer 212 may include a memory containing computer executable instructions for processing an order from scanning devices 202 and 204. As an example, an order can include an identifier (such as a serial number of the scanning device 202/204 or an identifier that partially or uniquely identifies the user of the scanner), scanning context information (e.g., time of scan, location of scan, etc.) and/or scanned information (such as a text string) that is used to uniquely identify the document being scanned. In alternative embodiments, the operating environment may include more or less components.

[0043] Also available on the network 220 are search engines 232, document sources 234, user account services 236, markup services 238 and other network services 239. The network 220 may be a corporate intranet, the public Internet, a mobile phone network or some other network, or any interconnection of the above.

[0044] Regardless of the manner by which the devices are coupled to each other, they may all may be operable in accordance with well-known commercial transaction and communication protocols (e.g., Internet Protocol (IP)). In various embodiments, the functions and capabilities of scanning device 202, computer 212, and mobile station 216 may be wholly or partially integrated into one device. Thus, the terms scanning device, computer, and mobile station can refer to the same device depending upon whether the device incorporates functions or capabilities of the scanning device 202, computer 212 and mobile station 216. In addition, some or all of the functions of the search engines 232, document sources 234, user account services 236, markup services 238 and other network services 239 may be implemented on any of the devices and/or other devices not shown.

[0045] 2.3. The Capture Device

[0046] As described above, the capture device may capture text using an optical scanner that captures image data from the rendered document, or using an audio recording device that captures a user's spoken reading of the text, or other methods. Some embodiments of the capture device may also capture images, graphical symbols and icons, etc., including machine readable codes such as barcodes. The device may be exceedingly simple, consisting of little more than the transducer, some storage, and a data interface, relying on other functionality residing elsewhere in the system, or it may be a more full-featured device. For illustration, this section describes a device based around an optical scanner and with a reasonable number of features.

[0047] Scanners are well known devices that capture and digitize images. An offshoot of the photocopier industry, the first scanners were relatively large devices that captured an entire document page at once. Recently, portable optical scanners have been introduced in convenient form factors, such as a pen-shaped handheld device.

[0048] In some embodiments, the portable scanner is used to scan text, graphics, or symbols from rendered documents. The portable scanner has a scanning element that captures text, symbols, graphics, etc, from rendered documents. In addition to documents that have been printed on paper, in some embodiments, rendered documents include documents that have been displayed on a screen such as a CRT monitor or LCD display.

[0049] FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a scanner 302. The scanner 302 comprises an optical scanning head 308 to scan information from rendered documents and convert it to machine-compatible data, and an optical path 306, typically a lens, an aperture or an image conduit to convey the image from the rendered document to the scanning head. The scanning head 308 may incorporate a Charge-Coupled Device (CCD), a Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) imaging device, or an optical sensor of another type.

[0050] A microphone 310 and associated circuitry convert the sound of the environment (including spoken words) into machine-compatible signals, and other input facilities exist in the form of buttons, scroll-wheels or other tactile sensors such as touch-pads 314.

[0051] Feedback to the user is possible through a visual display or indicator lights 332, through a loudspeaker or other audio transducer 334 and through a vibrate module 336.

[0052] The scanner 302 comprises logic 326 to interact with the various other components, possibly processing the received signals into different formats and/or interpretations. Logic 326 may be operable to read and write data and program instructions stored in associated storage 330 such as RAM, ROM, flash, or other suitable memory. It may read a time signal from the clock unit 328. The scanner 302 also includes an interface 316 to communicate scanned information and other signals to a network and/or an associated computing device. In some embodiments, the scanner 302 may have an on-board power supply 332. In other embodiments, the scanner 302 may be powered from a tethered connection to another device, such as a Universal Serial Bus (USB) connection.

[0053] As an example of one use of scanner 302, a reader may scan some text from a newspaper article with scanner 302. The text is scanned as a bit-mapped image via the scanning head 308. Logic 326 causes the bit-mapped image to be stored in memory 330 with an associated time-stamp read from the clock unit 328. Logic 326 may also perform optical character recognition (OCR) or other post-scan processing on the bit-mapped image to convert it to text. Logic 326 may optionally extract a signature from the image, for example by performing a convolution-like process to locate repeating occurrences of characters, symbols or objects, and determine the distance or number of other characters, symbols, or objects between these repeated elements. The reader may then upload the bit-mapped image (or text or other signature, if post-scan processing has been performed by logic 326) to an associated computer via interface 316.

[0054] As an example of another use of scanner 302, a reader may capture some text from an article as an audio file by using microphone 310 as an acoustic capture port. Logic 326 causes audio file to be stored in memory 328. Logic 326 may also perform voice recognition or other post-scan processing on the audio file to convert it to text. As above, the reader may then upload the audio file (or text produced by post-scan processing performed by logic 326) to an associated computer via interface 316.

Part II—Overview of the Areas of the Core System

[0055] As paper-digital integration becomes more common, there are many aspects of existing technologies that can be changed to take better advantage of this integration, or to enable it to be implemented more effectively. This section highlights some of those issues.

3. Search

[0056] Searching a corpus of documents, even so large a corpus as the World Wide Web, has become commonplace for ordinary users, who use a keyboard to construct a search query which is sent to a search engine. This section and the next discuss the aspects of both the construction of a query originated by a capture from a rendered document, and the search engine that handles such a query.

[0057] 3.1. Scan/Speak/Type as Search Query

[0058] Use of the described system typically starts with a few words being captured from a rendered document using any of several methods, including those mentioned in Section 1.2 above. Where the input needs some interpretation to convert it to text, for example in the case of OCR or speech input, there may be end-to-end feedback in the system so that the document corpus can be used to enhance the recognition process. End-to-end feedback can be applied by performing an approximation of the recognition or interpretation, identifying a set of one or more candidate matching documents, and then using information from the possible matches in the candidate documents to further refine or restrict the recognition or interpretation. Candidate documents can be weighted according to their probable relevance (for example, based on then number of other users who have scanned in these documents, or their popularity on the Internet), and these weights can be applied in this iterative recognition process.

[0059] 3.2. Short Phrase Searching

[0060] Because the selective power of a search query based on a few words is greatly enhanced when the relative positions of these words are known, only a small amount of text need be captured for the system to identify the text's location in a corpus. Most commonly, the input text will be a contiguous sequence of words, such as a short phrase.

[0061] 3.2.1. Finding Document and Location in Document from Short Capture

[0062] In addition to locating the document from which a phrase originates, the system can identify the location in that document and can take action based on this knowledge.

[0063] 3.2.2. Other Methods of Finding Location

[0064] The system may also employ other methods of discovering the document and location, such as by using watermarks or other special markings on the rendered document.

[0065] 3.3. Incorporation of Other Factors in Search Query

[0066] In addition to the captured text, other factors (i.e., information about user identity, profile, and context) may form part of the search query, such as the time of the capture, the identity and geographical location of the user, knowledge of the user's habits and recent activities, etc.

[0067] The document identity and other information related to previous captures, especially if they were quite recent, may form part of a search query.

[0068] The identity of the user may be determined from a unique identifier associated with a capturing device, and/or biometric or other supplemental information (speech patterns, fingerprints, etc.).

[0069] 3.4. Knowledge of Nature of Unreliability in Search Query (OCR Errors, etc.)

[0070] The search query can be constructed taking into account the types of errors likely to occur in the particular capture method used. One example of this is an indication of suspected errors in the recognition of specific characters; in this instance a search engine may treat these characters as wildcards, or assign them a lower priority.

[0071] 3.5. Local Caching of Index for Performance/Offline Use

[0072] Sometimes the capturing device may not be in communication with the search engine or corpus at the time of the data capture. For this reason, information helpful to the offline use of the device may be downloaded to the device in advance, or to some entity with which the device can communicate. In some cases, all or a substantial part of an index associated with a corpus may be downloaded. This topic is discussed further in Section 15.3.

[0073] 3.6. Queries, in Whatever Form, May be Recorded and Acted on Later

[0074] If there are likely to be delays or cost associated with communicating a query or receiving the results, this pre-loaded information can improve the performance of the local device, reduce communication costs, and provide helpful and timely user feedback.

[0075] In the situation where no communication is available (the local device is “offline”), the queries may be saved and transmitted to the rest of the system at such a time as communication is restored.

[0076] In these cases it may be important to transmit a timestamp with each query. The time of the capture can be a significant factor in the interpretation of the query. For example, Section 13.1 discusses the importance of the time of capture in relation to earlier captures. It is important to note that the time of capture will not always be the same as the time that the query is executed.

[0077] 3.7. Parallel Searching

[0078] For performance reasons, multiple queries may be launched in response to a single capture, either in sequence or in parallel. Several queries may be sent in response to a single capture, for example as new words are added to the capture, or to query multiple search engines in parallel.

[0079] For example, in some embodiments, the system sends queries to a special index for the current document, to a search engine on a local machine, to a search engine on the corporate network, and to remote search engines on the Internet.

[0080] The results of particular searches may be given higher priority than those from others.

[0081] The response to a given query may indicate that other pending queries are superfluous; these may be cancelled before completion.

4. Paper and Search Engines

[0082] Often it is desirable for a search engine that handles traditional online queries also to handle those originating from rendered documents. Conventional search engines may be enhanced or modified in a number of ways to make them more suitable for use with the described system.

[0083] The search engine and/or other components of the system may create and maintain indices that have different or extra features. The system may modify an incoming paper-originated query or change the way the query is handled in the resulting search, thus distinguishing these paper-originated queries from those coming from queries typed into web browsers and other sources. And the system may take different actions or offer different options when the results are returned by the searches originated from paper as compared to those from other sources. Each of these approaches is discussed below.

[0084] 4.1. Indexing

[0085] Often, the same index can be searched using either paper-originated or traditional queries, but the index may be enhanced for use in the current system in a variety of ways.

[0086] 4.1.1. Knowledge about the Paper Form

[0087] Extra fields can be added to such an index that will help in the case of a paper-based search.

Index Entry Indicating Document Availability in Paper Form

[0088] The first example is a field indicating that the document is known to exist or be distributed in paper form. The system may give such documents higher priority if the query comes from paper.

Knowledge of Popularity Paper Form

[0089] In this example statistical data concerning the popularity of paper documents (and, optionally, concerning sub-regions within these documents)—for example the amount of scanning activity, circulation numbers provided by the publisher or other sources, etc—is used to give such documents higher priority, to boost the priority of digital counterpart documents (for example, for browser-based queries or web searches), etc.

Knowledge of Rendered Format

[0090] Another important example may be recording information about the layout of a specific rendering of a document.

[0091] For a particular edition of a book, for example, the index may include information about where the line breaks and page breaks occur, which fonts were used, any unusual capitalization.

[0092] The index may also include information about the proximity of other items on the page, such as images, text boxes, tables and advertisements.

Use of Semantic Information in Original

[0093] Lastly, semantic information that can be deduced from the source markup but is not apparent in the paper document, such as the fact that a particular piece of text refers to an item offered for sale, or that a certain paragraph contains program code, may also be recorded in the index.

[0094] 4.1.2. Indexing in the Knowledge of the Capture Method

[0095] A second factor that may modify the nature of the index is the knowledge of the type of capture likely to be used. A search initiated by an optical scan may benefit if the index takes into account characters that are easily confused in the OCR process, or includes some knowledge of the fonts used in the document. Similarly, if the query is from speech recognition, an index based on similar-sounding phonemes may be much more efficiently searched. An additional factor that may affect the use of the index in the described model is the importance of iterative feedback during the recognition process. If the search engine is able to provide feedback from the index as the text is being captured, it can greatly increase the accuracy of the capture.

Indexing Using Offsets

[0096] If the index is likely to be searched using the offset-based/autocorrelation OCR methods described in Section 9, in some embodiments, the system stores the appropriate offset or signature information in an index.

[0097] 4.1.3. Multiple Indices

[0098] Lastly, in the described system, it may be common to conduct searches on many indices. Indices may be maintained on several machines on a corporate network. Partial indices may be downloaded to the capture device, or to a machine close to the capture device. Separate indices may be created for users or groups of users with particular interests, habits or permissions. An index may exist for each filesystem, each directory, even each file on a user's hard disk. Indexes are published and subscribed to by users and by systems. It will be important, then, to construct indices that can be distributed, updated, merged and separated efficiently.

[0099] 4.2. Handling the Queries

[0100] 4.2.1. Knowing the Capture is from Paper

[0101] A search engine may take different actions when it recognizes that a search query originated from a paper document. The engine might handle the query in a way that is more tolerant to the types of errors likely to appear in certain capture methods, for example.

[0102] It may be able to deduce this from some indicator included in the query (for example a flag indicating the nature of the capture), or it may deduce this from the query itself (for example, it may recognize errors or uncertainties typical of the OCR process).

[0103] Alternatively, queries from a capture device can reach the engine by a different channel or port or type of connection than those from other sources, and can be distinguished in that way. For example, some embodiments of the system will route queries to the search engine by way of a dedicated gateway. Thus, the search engine knows that all queries passing through the dedicated gateway were originated from a paper document.

[0104] 4.2.2. Use of Context

[0105] Section 13 below describes a variety of different factors which are external to the captured text itself, yet which can be a significant aid in identifying a document. These include such things as the history of recent scans, the longer-term reading habits of a particular user, the geographic location of a user and the user's recent use of particular electronic documents. Such factors are referred to herein as “context.”

[0106] Some of the context may be handled by the search engine itself, and be reflected in the search results. For example, the search engine may keep track of a user's scanning history, and may also cross-reference this scanning history to conventional keyboard-based queries. In such cases, the search engine maintains and uses more state information about each individual user than do most conventional search engines, and each interaction with a search engine may be considered to extend over several searches and a longer period of time than is typical today.

[0107] Some of the context may be transmitted to the search engine in the search query (Section 3.3), and may possibly be stored at the engine so as to play a part in future queries. Lastly, some of the context will best be handled elsewhere, and so becomes a filter or secondary search applied to the results from the search engine.

Data-Stream Input to Search

[0108] An important input into the search process is the broader context of how the community of users is interacting with the rendered version of the document—for example, which documents are most widely read and by whom. There are analogies with a web search returning the pages that are most frequently linked to, or those that are most frequently selected from past search results. For further discussion of this topic, see Sections 13.4 and 14.2.

[0109] 4.2.3. Document Sub-Regions

[0110] The described system can emit and use not only information about documents as a whole, but also information about sub-regions of documents, even down to individual words. Many existing search engines concentrate simply on locating a document or file that is relevant to a particular query. Those that can work on a finer grain and identify a location within a document will provide a significant benefit for the described system.

[0111] 4.3. Returning the Results

[0112] The search engine may use some of the further information it now maintains to affect the results returned.

[0113] The system may also return certain documents to which the user has access only as a result of being in possession of the paper copy (Section 7.4).

[0114] The search engine may also offer new actions or options appropriate to the described system, beyond simple retrieval of the text.

5. Markup, Annotations and Metadata

[0115] In addition to performing the capture-search-retrieve process, the described system also associates extra functionality with a document, and in particular with specific locations or segments of text within a document. This extra functionality is often, though not exclusively, associated with the rendered document by being associated with its electronic counterpart. As an example, hyperlinks in a web page could have the same functionality when a printout of that web page is scanned. In some cases, the functionality is not defined in the electronic document, but is stored or generated elsewhere.

[0116] This layer of added functionality is referred to herein as “markup.”

[0117] 5.1. Overlays, Static and Dynamic

[0118] One way to think of the markup is as an “overlay” on the document, which provides further information about—and may specify actions associated with—the document or some portion of it. The markup may include human-readable content, but is often invisible to a user and/or intended for machine use. Examples include options to be displayed in a popup-menu on a nearby display when a user captures text from a particular area in a rendered document, or audio samples that illustrate the pronunciation of a particular phrase.

[0119] 5.1.1. Several Layers, Possibly from Several Sources

[0120] Any document may have multiple overlays simultaneously, and these may be sourced from a variety of locations. Markup data may be created or supplied by the author of the document, or by the user, or by some other party.

[0121] Markup data may be attached to the electronic document or embedded in it. It may be found in a conventional location (for example, in the same place as the document but with a different filename suffix). Markup data may be included in the search results of the query that located the original document, or may be found by a separate query to the same or another search engine. Markup data may be found using the original captured text and other capture information or contextual information, or it may be found using already-deduced information about the document and location of the capture. Markup data may be found in a location specified in the document, even if the markup itself is not included in the document.

[0122] The markup may be largely static and specific to the document, similar to the way links on a traditional html web page are often embedded as static data within the html document, but markup may also be dynamically generated and/or applied to a large number of documents. An example of dynamic markup is information attached to a document that includes the up-to-date share price of companies mentioned in that document. An example of broadly applied markup is translation information that is automatically available on multiple documents or sections of documents in a particular language.

[0123] 5.1.2. Personal “Plug-In” Layers

[0124] Users may also install, or subscribe to particular sources of, markup data, thus personalizing the system's response to particular captures.

[0125] 5.2. Keywords and Phrases, Trademarks and Logos

[0126] Some elements in documents may have particular “markup” or functionality associated with them based on their own characteristics rather than their location in a particular document. Examples include special marks that are printed in the document purely for the purpose of being scanned, as well as logos and trademarks that can link the user to further information about the organization concerned. The same applies to “keywords” or “key phrases” in the text. Organizations might register particular phrases with which they are associated, or with which they would like to be associated, and attach certain markup to them that would be available wherever that phrase was scanned.

[0127] Any word, phrase, etc. may have associated markup. For example, the system may add certain items to a pop-up menu (e.g., a link to an online bookstore) whenever the user captures the word “book,” or the title of a book, or a topic related to books. In some embodiments, of the system, digital counterpart documents or indices are consulted to determine whether a capture occurred near the word “book,” or the title of a book, or a topic related to books—and the system behavior is modified in accordance with this proximity to keyword elements. In the preceding example, note that markup enables data captured from non-commercial text or documents to trigger a commercial transaction.

[0128] 5.3. User-Supplied Content

[0129] 5.3.1. User Comments and Annotations, Including Multimedia

[0130] Annotations are another type of electronic information that may be associated with a document. For example, a user can attach an audio file of his/her thoughts about a particular document for later retrieval as voice annotations. As another example of a multimedia annotation, a user may attach photographs of places referred to in the document. The user generally supplies annotations for the document but the system can associate annotations from other sources (for example, other users in a work group may share annotations).

[0131] 5.3.2. Notes from Proof-Reading

[0132] An important example of user-sourced markup is the annotation of paper documents as part of a proofreading, editing or reviewing process.

[0133] 5.4. Third-Party Content

[0134] As mentioned earlier, markup data may often be supplied by third parties, such as by other readers of the document. Online discussions and reviews are a good example, as are community-managed information relating to particular works, volunteer-contributed translations and explanations.

[0135] Another example of third-party markup is that provided by advertisers.

[0136] 5.5. Dynamic Markup Based on Other Users' Data Streams

[0137] By analyzing the data captured from documents by several or all users of the system, markup can be generated based on the activities and interests of a community. An example might be an online bookstore that creates markup or annotations that tell the user, in effect, “People who enjoyed this book also enjoyed . . . .” The markup may be less anonymous, and may tell the user which of the people in his/her contact list have also read this document recently. Other examples of datastream analysis are included in Section 14.

[0138] 5.6. Markup Based on External Events and Data Sources

[0139] Markup will often be based on external events and data sources, such as input from a corporate database, information from the public Internet, or statistics gathered by the local operating system.

[0140] Data sources may also be more local, and in particular may provide information about the user's context—his/her identity, location and activities. For example, the system might communicate with the user's mobile phone and offer a markup layer that gives the user the option to send a document to somebody that the user has recently spoken to on the phone.

6. Authentication, Personalization and Security

[0141] In many situations, the identity of the user will be known. Sometimes this will be an “anonymous identity,” where the user is identified only by the serial number of the capture device, for example. Typically, however, it is expected that the system will have a much more detailed knowledge of the user, which can be used for personalizing the system and to allow activities and transactions to be performed in the user's name.

[0142] 6.1. User History and “Life Library”

[0143] One of the simplest and yet most useful functions that the system can perform is to keep a record for a user of the text that s/he has captured and any further information related to that capture, including the details of any documents found, the location within that document and any actions taken as a result.

[0144] This stored history is beneficial for both the user and the system.

[0145] 6.1.1. For the User

[0146] The user can be presented with a “Life Library,” a record of everything s/he has read and captured. This may be simply for personal interest, but may be used, for example, in a library by an academic who is gathering material for the bibliography of his next paper.

[0147] In some circumstances, the user may wish to make the library public, such as by publishing it on the web in a similar manner to a weblog, so that others may see what s/he is reading and finds of interest.

[0148] Lastly, in situations where the user captures some text and the system cannot immediately act upon the capture (for example, because an electronic version of the document is not yet available) the capture can be stored in the library and can be processed later, either automatically or in response to a user request. A user can also subscribe to new markup services and apply them to previously captured scans.

[0149] 6.1.2. For the System

[0150] A record of a user's past captures is also useful for the system. Many aspects of the system operation can be enhanced by knowing the user's reading habits and history. The simplest example is that any scan made by a user is more likely to come from a document that the user has scanned in the recent past, and in particular if the previous scan was within the last few minutes it is very likely to be from the same document. Similarly, it is more likely that a document is being read in start-to-finish order. Thus, for English documents, it is also more likely that later scans will occur farther down in the document. Such factors can help the system establish the location of the capture in cases of ambiguity, and can also reduce the amount of text that needs to be captured.

[0151] 6.2. Scanner as Payment, Identity and Authentication Device

[0152] Because the capture process generally begins with a device of some sort, typically an optical scanner or voice recorder, this device may be used as a key that identifies the user and authorizes certain actions.

[0153] 6.2.1. Associate Scanner with Phone or Other Account

[0154] The device may be embedded in a mobile phone or in some other way associated with a mobile phone account. For example, a scanner may be associated with a mobile phone account by inserting a SIM card associated with the account into the scanner. Similarly, the device may be embedded in a credit card or other payment card, or have the facility for such a card to be connected to it. The device may therefore be used as a payment token, and financial transactions may be initiated by the capture from the rendered document.

[0155] 6.2.2. Using Scanner Input for Authentication

[0156] The scanner may also be associated with a particular user or account through the process of scanning some token, symbol or text associated with that user or account. In addition, scanner may be used for biometric identification, for example by scanning the fingerprint of the user. In the case of an audio-based capture device, the system may identify the user by matching the voice pattern of the user or by requiring the user to speak a certain password or phrase.

[0157] For example, where a user scans a quote from a book and is offered the option to buy the book from an online retailer, the user can select this option, and is then prompted to scan his/her fingerprint to confirm the transaction.

[0158] See also Sections 15.5 and 15.6.

[0159] 6.2.3. Secure Scanning Device

[0160] When the capture device is used to identify and authenticate the user, and to initiate transactions on behalf of the user, it is important that communications between the device and other parts of the system are secure. It is also important to guard against such situations as another device impersonating a scanner, and so-called “man in the middle” attacks where communications between the device and other components are intercepted.

[0161] Techniques for providing such security are well understood in the art; in various embodiments, the hardware and software in the device and elsewhere in the system are configured to implement such techniques.

7. Publishing Models and Elements

[0162] An advantage of the described system is that there is no need to alter the traditional processes of creating, printing or publishing documents in order to gain many of the system's benefits. There are reasons, though, that the creators or publishers of a document—hereafter simply referred to as the “publishers”—may wish to create functionality to support the described system.

[0163] This section is primarily concerned with the published documents themselves. For information about other related commercial transactions, such as advertising, see Section 10 entitled “P-Commerce.”

[0164] 7.1. Electronic Companions to Printed Documents

[0165] The system allows for printed documents to have an associated electronic presence. Conventionally publishers often ship a CD-ROM with a book that contains further digital information, tutorial movies and other multimedia data, sample code or documents, or further reference materials. In addition, some publishers maintain web sites associated with particular publications which provide such materials, as well as information which may be updated after the time of publishing, such as errata, further comments, updated reference materials, bibliographies and further sources of relevant data, and translations into other languages. Online forums allow readers to contribute their comments about the publication.

[0166] The described system allows such materials to be much more closely tied to the rendered document than ever before, and allows the discovery of and interaction with them to be much easier for the user. By capturing a portion of text from the document, the system can automatically connect the user to digital materials associated with the document, and more particularly associated with that specific part of the document. Similarly, the user can be connected to online communities that discuss that section of the text, or to annotations and commentaries by other readers. In the past, such information would typically need to be found by searching for a particular page number or chapter.

[0167] An example application of this is in the area of academic textbooks (Section 17.5).

[0168] 7.2. “Subscriptions” to Printed Documents

[0169] Some publishers may have mailing lists to which readers can subscribe if they wish to be notified of new relevant matter or when a new edition of the book is published. With the described system, the user can register an interest in particular documents or parts of documents more easily, in some cases even before the publisher has considered providing any such functionality. The reader's interest can be fed to the publisher, possibly affecting their decision about when and where to provide updates, further information, new editions or even completely new publications on topics that have proved to be of interest in existing books.

[0170] 7.3. Printed Marks with Special Meaning or Containing Special Data

[0171] Many aspects of the system are enabled simply through the use of the text already existing in a document. If the document is produced in the knowledge that it may be used in conjunction with the system, however, extra functionality can be added by printing extra information in the form of special marks, which may be used to identify the text or a required action more closely, or otherwise enhance the document's interaction with the system. The simplest and most important example is an indication to the reader that the document is definitely accessible through the system. A special icon might be used, for example, to indicate that this document has an online discussion forum associated with it.

[0172] Such symbols may be intended purely for the reader, or they may be recognized by the system when scanned and used to initiate some action. Sufficient data may be encoded in the symbol to identify more than just the symbol: it may also store information, for example about the document, edition, and location of the symbol, which could be recognized and read by the system.

[0173] 7.4. Authorization Through Possession of the Paper Document

[0174] There are some situations where possession of or access to the printed document would entitle the user to certain privileges, for example, the access to an electronic copy of the document or to additional materials. With the described system, such privileges could be granted simply as a result of the user capturing portions of text from the document, or scanning specially printed symbols. In cases where the system needed to ensure that the user was in possession of the entire document, it might prompt the user to scan particular items or phrases from particular pages, e.g. “the second line of page 46.”

[0175] 7.5. Documents which Expire

[0176] If the printed document is a gateway to extra materials and functionality, access to such features can also be time-limited. After the expiry date, a user may be required to pay a fee or obtain a newer version of the document to access the features again. The paper document will, of course, still be usable, but will lose some of its enhanced electronic functionality. This may be desirable, for example, because there is profit for the publisher in receiving fees for access to electronic materials, or in requiring the user to purchase new editions from time to time, or because there are disadvantages associated with outdated versions of the printed document remaining in circulation. Coupons are an example of a type of commercial document that can have an expiration date.

[0177] 7.6. Popularity Analysis and Publishing Decisions

[0178] Section 10.5 discusses the use of the system's statistics to influence compensation of authors and pricing of advertisements.

[0179] In some embodiments, the system deduces the popularity of a publication from the activity in the electronic community associated with it as well as from the use of the paper document. These factors may help publishers to make decisions about what they will publish in future. If a chapter in an existing book, for example, turns out to be exceedingly popular, it may be worth expanding into a separate publication.

8. Document Access Services

[0180] An important aspect of the described system is the ability to provide to a user who has access to a rendered copy of a document access to an electronic version of that document. In some cases, a document is freely available on a public network or a private network to which the user has access. The system uses the captured text to identify, locate and retrieve the document, in some cases displaying it on the user's screen or depositing it in their email inbox.

[0181] In some cases, a document will be available in electronic form, but for a variety of reasons may not be accessible to the user. There may not be sufficient connectivity to retrieve the document, the user may not be entitled to retrieve it, there may be a cost associated with gaining access to it, or the document may have been withdrawn and possibly replaced by a new version, to name just a few possibilities. The system typically provides feedback to the user about these situations.

[0182] As mentioned in Section 7.4, the degree or nature of the access granted to a particular user may be different if it is known that the user already has access to a printed copy of the document.

[0183] 8.1. Authenticated Document Access

[0184] Access to the document may be restricted to specific users, or to those meeting particular criteria, or may only be available in certain circumstances, for example when the user is connected to a secure network. Section 6 describes some of the ways in which the credentials of a user and scanner may be established.

[0185] 8.2. Document Purchase—Copyright-Owner Compensation

[0186] Documents that are not freely available to the general public may still be accessible on payment of a fee, often as compensation to the publisher or copyright-holder. The system may implement payment facilities directly or may make use of other payment methods associated with the user, including those described in Section 6.2.

[0187] 8.3. Document Escrow and Proactive Retrieval

[0188] Electronic documents are often transient; the digital source version of a rendered document may be available now but inaccessible in future. The system may retrieve and store the existing version on behalf of the user, even if the user has not requested it, thus guaranteeing its availability should the user request it in future. This also makes it available for the system's use, for example for searching as part of the process of identifying future captures.

[0189] In the event that payment is required for access to the document, a trusted “document escrow” service can retrieve the document on behalf of the user, such as upon payment of a modest fee, with the assurance that the copyright holder will be fully compensated in future if the user should ever request the document from the service.

[0190] Variations on this theme can be implemented if the document is not available in electronic form at the time of capture. The user can authorize the service to submit a request for or make a payment for the document on his/her behalf if the electronic document should become available at a later date.

[0191] 8.4. Association with other Subscriptions and Accounts

[0192] Sometimes payment may be waived, reduced or satisfied based on the user's existing association with another account or subscription. Subscribers to the printed version of a newspaper might automatically be entitled to retrieve the electronic version, for example.

[0193] In other cases, the association may not be quite so direct: a user may be granted access based on an account established by their employer, or based on their scanning of a printed copy owned by a friend who is a subscriber.

[0194] 8.5. Replacing Photocopying with Scan-and-Print

[0195] The process of capturing text from a paper document, identifying an electronic original, and printing that original, or some portion of that original associated with the capture, forms an alternative to traditional photocopying with many advantages:

- [0196] the paper document need not be in the same location as the final printout, and in any case need not be there at the same time
- [0197] the wear and damage caused to documents by the photocopying process, especially to old, fragile and valuable documents, can be avoided
- [0198] the quality of the copy is typically be much higher
- [0199] records may be kept about which documents or portions of documents are the most frequently copied
- [0200] payment may be made to the copyright owner as part of the process
- [0201] unauthorized copying may be prohibited

[0202] 8.6. Locating Valuable Originals from Photocopies

[0203] When documents are particularly valuable, as in the case of legal instruments or documents that have historical or other particular significance, people may typically work from copies of those documents, often for many years, while the originals are kept in a safe location.

[0204] The described system could be coupled to a database which records the location of an original document, for example in an archiving warehouse, making it easy for somebody with access to a copy to locate the archived original paper document.

9. Text Recognition Technologies

[0205] Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technologies have traditionally focused on images that include a large amount of text, for example from a flat-bed scanner capturing a whole page. OCR technologies often need substantial training and correcting by the user to produce useful text. OCR technologies often require substantial processing power on the machine doing the OCR, and, while many systems use a dictionary, they are generally expected to operate on an effectively infinite vocabulary.

[0206] All of the above traditional characteristics may be improved upon in the described system.

[0207] While this section focuses on OCR, many of the issues discussed map directly onto other recognition technologies, in particular speech recognition. As mentioned in Section 3.1, the process of capturing from paper may be achieved by a user reading the text aloud into a device which captures audio. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that principles discussed here with respect to images, fonts, and text fragments often also apply to audio samples, user speech models and phonemes.

[0208] 9.1. Optimization for Appropriate Devices

[0209] A scanning device for use with the described system will often be small, portable, and low power. The scanning device may capture only a few words at a time, and in some implementations does not even capture a whole character at once, but rather a horizontal slice through the text, many such slices being stitched together to form a recognizable signal from which the text may be deduced. The scanning device may also have very limited processing power or storage so, while in some embodiments it may perform all of the OCR process itself, many embodiments will depend on a connection to a more powerful device, possibly at a later time, to convert the captured signals into text. Lastly, it may have very limited facilities for user interaction, so may need to defer any requests for user input until later, or operate in a “best-guess” mode to a greater degree than is common now.

[0210] 9.2. “Uncertain” OCR

[0211] The primary new characteristic of OCR within the described system is the fact that it will, in general, examine images of text which exists elsewhere and which may be retrieved in digital form. An exact transcription of the text is therefore not always required from the OCR engine. The OCR system may output a set or a matrix of possible matches, in some cases including probability weightings, which can still be used to search for the digital original.

[0212] 9.3. Iterative OCR—Guess, Disambiguate, Guess . . .

[0213] If the device performing the recognition is able to contact the document index at the time of processing, then the OCR process can be informed by the contents of the document corpus as it progresses, potentially offering substantially greater recognition accuracy.

[0214] Such a connection will also allow the device to inform the user when sufficient text has been captured to identify the digital source.

[0215] 9.4. Using Knowledge of Likely Rendering

[0216] When the system has knowledge of aspects of the likely printed rendering of a document—such as the font typeface used in printing, or the layout of the page, or which sections are in italics—this too can help in the recognition process. (Section 4.1.1)

[0217] 9.5. Font Caching—Determine Font on Host, Download to Client

[0218] As candidate source texts in the document corpus are identified, the font, or a rendering of it, may be downloaded to the device to help with the recognition.

[0219] 9.6. Autocorrelation and Character Offsets

[0220] While component characters of a text fragment may be the most recognized way to represent a fragment of text that may be used as a document signature, other representations of the text may work sufficiently well that the actual text of a text fragment need not be used when attempting to locate the text fragment in a digital document and/or database, or when disambiguating the representation of a text fragment into a readable form. Other representations of text fragments may provide benefits that actual text representations lack. For example, optical character recognition of text fragments is often prone to errors, unlike other representations of captured text fragments that may be used to search for and/or recreate a text fragment without resorting to optical character recognition for the entire fragment. Such methods may be more appropriate for some devices used with the current system.

[0221] Those of ordinary skill in the art and others will appreciate that there are many ways of describing the appearance of text fragments. Such characterizations of text fragments may include, but are not limited to, word lengths, relative word lengths, character heights, character widths, character shapes, character frequencies, token frequencies, and the like. In some embodiments, the offsets between matching text tokens (i.e., the number of intervening tokens plus one) are used to characterize fragments of text.

[0222] Conventional OCR uses knowledge about fonts, letter structure and shape to attempt to determine characters in scanned text. Embodiments of the system are different; they employ a variety of methods that use the rendered text itself to assist in the recognition process. These embodiments use characters (or tokens) to “recognize each other.” One way to refer to such self-recognition is “template matching,” and is similar to “convolution.” To perform such self-recognition, the system slides a copy of the text horizontally over itself and notes matching regions of the text images. Prior template matching and convolution techniques encompass a variety of related techniques. These techniques to tokenize and/or recognize characters/tokens will be collectively referred to herein as “autocorrelation,” as the text is used to correlate with its own component parts when matching characters/tokens.

[0223] When autocorrelating, complete connected regions that match are of interest. This occurs when characters (or groups of characters) overlay other instances of the same character (or group). Complete connected regions that match automatically provide tokenizing of the text into component tokens. As the two copies of the text are slid past each other, the regions where perfect matching occurs (i.e., all pixels in a vertical slice are matched) are noted. When a character/token matches itself, the horizontal extent of this matching (e.g., the connected matching portion of the text) also matches.

[0224] Note that at this stage there is no need to determine the actual identity of each token (i.e., the particular letter, digit or symbol, or group of these, that corresponds to the token image), only the offset to the next occurrence of the same token in the scanned text. The offset number is the distance (number of tokens) to the next occurrence of the same token. If the token is unique within the text string, the offset is zero (0). The sequence of token offsets thus generated is a signature that can be used to identify the scanned text.

[0225] In some embodiments, the token offsets determined for a string of scanned tokens are compared to an index that indexes a corpus of electronic documents based upon the token offsets of their contents (Section 4.1.2). In other embodiments, the token offsets determined for a string of scanned tokens are converted to text, and compared to a more conventional index that indexes a corpus of electronic documents based upon their contents

[0226] As has been noted earlier, a similar token-correlation process may be applied to speech fragments when the capture process consists of audio samples of spoken words.

[0227] 9.7. Font/Character “Self-Recognition”

[0228] Conventional template-matching OCR compares scanned images to a library of character images. In essence, the alphabet is stored for each font and newly scanned images are compared to the stored images to find matching characters. The process generally has an initial delay until the correct font has been identified. After that, the OCR process is relatively quick because most documents use the same font throughout. Subsequent images can therefore be converted to text by comparison with the most recently identified font library.

[0229] The shapes of characters in most commonly used fonts are related. For example, in most fonts, the letter “c” and the letter “e” are visually related—as are “t” and “f,” etc. The OCR process is enhanced by use of this relationship to construct templates for letters that have not been scanned yet. For example, where a reader scans a short string of text from a paper document in a previously unencountered font such that the system does not have a set of image templates with which to compare the scanned images the system can leverage the probable relationship between certain characters to construct the font template library even though it has not yet encountered all of the letters in the alphabet. The system can then use the constructed font template library to recognize subsequent scanned text and to further refine the constructed font library.

[0230] 9.8. Send Anything Unrecognized (Including Graphics) to Server

[0231] When images cannot be machine-transcribed into a form suitable for use in a search process, the images themselves can be saved for later use by the user, for possible manual transcription, or for processing at a later date when different resources may be available to the system.

10. P-Commerce

[0232] Many of the actions made possible by the system result in some commercial transaction taking place. The phrase p-commerce is used herein to describe commercial activities initiated from paper via the system.

[0233] 10.1. Sales of Documents from their Physical Printed Copies.

[0234] When a user captures text from a document, the user may be offered that document for purchase either in paper or electronic form. The user may also be offered related documents, such as those quoted or otherwise referred to in the paper document, or those on a similar subject, or those by the same author.

[0235] 10.2. Sales of Anything Else Initiated or Aided by Paper

[0236] The capture of text may be linked to other commercial activities in a variety of ways. The captured text may be in a catalog that is explicitly designed to sell items, in which case the text will be associated fairly directly with the purchase of an item (Section 18.2). The text may also be part of an advertisement, in which case a sale of the item being advertised may ensue.

[0237] In other cases, the user captures other text from which their potential interest in a commercial transaction may be deduced. A reader of a novel set in a particular country, for example, might be interested in a holiday there. Someone reading a review of a new car might be considering purchasing it. The user may capture a particular fragment of text knowing that some commercial opportunity will be presented to them as a result, or it may be a side-effect of their capture activities.

[0238] 10.3. Capture of Labels, Icons, Serial Numbers, Barcodes on an Item Resulting in a Sale

[0239] Sometimes text or symbols are actually printed on an item or its packaging. An example is the serial number or product id often found on a label on the back or underside of a piece of electronic equipment. The system can offer the user a convenient way to purchase one or more of the same items by capturing that text. They may also be offered manuals, support or repair services.

[0240] 10.4. Contextual Advertisements

[0241] In addition to the direct capture of text from an advertisement, the system allows for a new kind of advertising which is not necessarily explicitly in the rendered document, but is nonetheless based on what people are reading.

[0242] 10.4.1. Advertising Based on Scan Context and History

[0243] In a traditional paper publication, advertisements generally consume a large amount of space relative to the text of a newspaper article, and a limited number of them can be placed around a particular article. In the described system, advertising can be associated with individual words or phrases, and can selected according to the particular interest the user has shown by capturing that text and possibly taking into account their history of past scans.

[0244] With the described system, it is possible for a purchase to be tied to a particular printed document and for an advertiser to get significantly more feedback about the effectiveness of their advertising in particular print publications.

[0245] 10.4.2. Advertising Based on User Context and History

[0246] The system may gather a large amount of information about other aspects of a user's context for its own use (Section 13); estimates of the geographical location of the user are a good example. Such data can also be used to tailor the advertising presented to a user of the system.

[0247] 10.5. Models of Compensation

[0248] The system enables some new models of compensation for advertisers and marketers. The publisher of a printed document containing advertisements may receive some income from a purchase that originated from their document. This may be true whether or not the advertisement existed in the original printed form; it may have been added electronically either by the publisher, the advertiser or some third party, and the sources of such advertising may have been subscribed to by the user.

[0249] 10.5.1. Popularity-Based Compensation

[0250] Analysis of the statistics generated by the system can reveal the popularity of certain parts of a publication (Section 14.2). In a newspaper, for example, it might reveal the amount of time readers spend looking at a particular page or article, or the popularity of a particular columnist. In some circumstances, it may be appropriate for an author or publisher to receive compensation based on the activities of the readers rather than on more traditional metrics such as words written or number of copies distributed. An author whose work becomes a frequently read authority on a subject might be considered differently in future contracts from one whose books have sold the same number of copies but are rarely opened. (See also Section 7.6)

[0251] 10.5.2. Popularity-Based Advertising

[0252] Decisions about advertising in a document may also be based on statistics about the readership. The advertising space around the most popular columnists may be sold at a premium rate. Advertisers might even be charged or compensated some time after the document is published based on knowledge about how it was received.

[0253] 10.6. Marketing Based on Life Library

[0254] The “Life Library” or scan history described in Sections 6.1 and 16.1 can be an extremely valuable source of information about the interests and habits of a user. Subject to the appropriate consent and privacy issues, such data can inform offers of goods or services to the user. Even in an anonymous form, the statistics gathered can be exceedingly useful.

[0255] 10.7. Sale/Information at Later Date (When Available)

[0256] Advertising and other opportunities for commercial transactions may not be presented to the user immediately at the time of text capture. For example, the opportunity to purchase a sequel to a novel may not be available at the time the user is reading the novel, but the system may present them with that opportunity when the sequel is published.

[0257] A user may capture data that relates to a purchase or other commercial transaction, but may choose not to initiate and/or complete the transaction at the time the capture is made. In some embodiments, data related to captures is stored in a user's Life Library, and these Life Library entries can remain “active” (i.e., capable of subsequent interactions similar to those available at the time the capture was made). Thus a user may review a capture at some later time, and optionally complete a transaction based on that capture. Because the system can keep track of when and where the original capture occurred, all parties involved in the transaction can be properly compensated. For example, the author who wrote the story—and the publisher who published the story—that appeared next to the advertisement from which the user captured data can be compensated when, six months later, the user visits their Life Library, selects that particular capture from the history, and chooses “Purchase this item at Amazon” from the pop-up menu (which can be similar or identical to the menu optionally presented at the time of the capture).

11. Operating System and Application Integration

[0258] Modern Operating Systems (OSs) and other software packages have many characteristics that can be advantageously exploited for use with the described system, and may also be modified in various ways to provide an even better platform for its use.

[0259] 11.1. Incorporation of Scan and Print-Related Information in Metadata and Indexing

[0260] New and upcoming file systems and their associated databases often have the ability to store a variety of metadata associated with each file. Traditionally, this metadata has included such things as the ID of the user who created the file, the dates of creation, last modification, and last use. Newer file systems allow such extra information as keywords, image characteristics, document sources and user comments to be stored, and in some systems this metadata can be arbitrarily extended. File systems can therefore be used to store information that would be useful in implementing the current system. For example, the date when a given document was last printed can be stored by the file system, as can details about which text from it has been captured from paper using the described system, and when and by whom.

[0261] Operating systems are also starting to incorporate search engine facilities that allow users to find local files more easily. These facilities can be advantageously used by the system. It means that many of the search-related concepts discussed in Sections 3 and 4 apply not just to today's Internet-based and similar search engines, but also to every personal computer.

[0262] In some cases specific software applications will also include support for the system above and beyond the facilities provided by the OS.

[0263] 11.2. OS Support for Capture Devices

[0264] As the use of capture devices such as pen scanners becomes increasingly common, it will become desirable to build support for them into the operating system, in much the same way as support is provided for mice and printers, since the applicability of capture devices extends beyond a single software application. The same will be true for other aspects of the system's operation. Some examples are discussed below. In some embodiments, the entire described system, or the core of it, is provided by the OS. In some embodiments, support for the system is provided by Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) that can be used by other software packages, including those directly implementing aspects of the system.

[0265] 11.2.1. Support for OCR and other Recognition Technologies

[0266] Most of the methods of capturing text from a rendered document require some recognition software to interpret the source data, typically a scanned image or some spoken words, as text suitable for use in the system. Some OSs include support for speech or handwriting recognition, though it is less common for OSs to include support for OCR, since in the past the use of OCR has typically been limited to a small range of applications.

[0267] As recognition components become part of the OS, they can take better advantage of other facilities provided by the OS. Many systems include spelling dictionaries, grammar analysis tools, internationalization and localization facilities, for example, all of which can be advantageously employed by the described system for its recognition process, especially since they may have been customized for the particular user to include words and phrases that he/she would commonly encounter.

[0268] If the operating system includes full-text indexing facilities, then these can also be used to inform the recognition process, as described in Section 9.3.

[0269] 11.2.2. Action to be Taken on Scans

[0270] If an optical scan or other capture occurs and is presented to the OS, it may have a default action to be taken under those circumstances in the event that no other subsystem claims ownership of the capture. An example of a default action is presenting the user with a choice of alternatives, or submitting the captured text to the OS's built-in search facilities.

[0271] 11.2.3. OS has Default Action for Particular Documents or Document Types

[0272] If the digital source of the rendered document is found, the OS may have a standard action that it will take when that particular document, or a document of that class, is scanned. Applications and other subsystems may register with the OS as potential handlers of particular types of capture, in a similar manner to the announcement by applications of their ability to handle certain file types.

[0273] Markup data associated with a rendered document, or with a capture from a document, can include instructions to the operating system to launch specific applications, pass applications arguments, parameters, or data, etc.

[0274] 11.2.4. Interpretation of Gestures and Mapping into Standard Actions

[0275] In Section 12.1.3 the use of “gestures” is discussed, particularly in the case of optical scanning, where particular movements made with a handheld scanner might represent standard actions such as marking the start and end of a region of text.

[0276] This is analogous to actions such as pressing the shift key on a keyboard while using the cursor keys to select a region of text, or using the wheel on a mouse to scroll a document. Such actions by the user are sufficiently standard that they are interpreted in a system-wide way by the OS, thus ensuring consistent behavior. The same is desirable for scanner gestures and other scanner-related actions.

[0277] 11.2.5. Set Response to Standard (and Non-Standard) Iconic/Text Printed Menu Items

[0278] In a similar way, certain items of text or other symbols may, when scanned, cause standard actions to occur, and the OS may provide a selection of these. An example might be that scanning the text “[print]” in any document would cause the OS to retrieve and print a copy of that document. The OS may also provide a way to register such actions and associate them with particular scans.

[0279] 11.3. Support in System GUI Components for Typical Scan-Initiated Activities

[0280] Most software applications are based substantially on standard Graphical User Interface components provided by the OS.

[0281] Use of these components by developers helps to ensure consistent behavior across multiple packages, for example that pressing the left-cursor key in any text-editing context should move the cursor to the left, without every programmer having to implement the same functionality independently.

[0282] A similar consistency in these components is desirable when the activities are initiated by text-capture or other aspects of the described system. Some examples are given below.

[0283] 11.3.1. Interface to Find Particular Text Content

[0284] A typical use of the system may be for the user to scan an area of a paper document, and for the system to open the electronic counterpart in a software package that is able to display or edit it, and cause that package to scroll to and highlight the scanned text (Section 12.2.1). The first part of this process, finding and opening the electronic document, is typically provided by the OS and is standard across software packages. The second part, however—locating a particular piece of text within a document and causing the package to scroll to it and highlight it—is not yet standardized and is often implemented differently by each package. The availability of a standard API for this functionality could greatly enhance the operation of this aspect of the system.

[0285] 11.3.2. Text Interactions

[0286] Once a piece of text has been located within a document, the system may wish to perform a variety of operations upon that text. As an example, the system may request the surrounding text, so that the user's capture of a few words could result in the system accessing the entire sentence or paragraph containing them. Again, this functionality can be usefully provided by the OS rather than being implemented in every piece of software that handles text.

[0287] 11.3.3. Contextual (Popup) Menus

[0288] Some of the operations that are enabled by the system will require user feedback, and this may be optimally requested within the context of the application handling the data. In some embodiments, the system uses the application pop-up menus traditionally associated with clicking the right mouse button on some text. The system inserts extra options into such menus, and causes them to be displayed as a result of activities such as scanning a paper document.

[0289] 11.4. Web/Network Interfaces

[0290] In today's increasingly networked world, much of the functionality available on individual machines can also be accessed over a network, and the functionality associated with the described system is no exception. As an example, in an office environment, many paper documents received by a user may have been printed by other users' machines on the same corporate network. The system on one computer, in response to a capture, may be able to query those other machines for documents which may correspond to that capture, subject to the appropriate permission controls.

[0291] 11.5. Printing of Document Causes Saving

[0292] An important factor in the integration of paper and digital documents is maintaining as much information as possible about the transitions between the two. In some embodiments, the OS keeps a simple record of when any document was printed and by whom. In some embodiments, the OS takes one or more further actions that would make it better suited for use with the system. Examples include:

- [0293] Saving the digital rendered version of every document printed along with information about the source from which it was printed
- [0294] Saving a subset of useful information about the printed version—for example, the fonts used and where the line breaks occur—which might aid future scan interpretation
- [0295] Saving the version of the source document associated with any printed copy
- [0296] Indexing the document automatically at the time of printing and storing the results for future searching

[0297] 11.6. My (Printed/Scanned) Documents

[0298] An OS often maintains certain categories of folders or files that have particular significance. A user's documents may, by convention or design, be found in a “My Documents” folder, for example. Standard file-opening dialogs may automatically include a list of recently opened documents.

[0299] On an OS optimized for use with the described system, such categories may be enhanced or augmented in ways that take into account a user's interaction with paper versions of the stored files. Categories such as “My Printed Documents” or “My Recently-Read Documents” might usefully be identified and incorporated in its operations.

[0300] 11.7. OS-Level Markup Hierarchies

[0301] Since important aspects of the system are typically provided using the “markup” concepts discussed in Section 5, it would clearly be advantageous to have support for such markup provided by the OS in a way that was accessible to multiple applications as well as to the OS itself. In addition, layers of markup may be provided by the OS, based on its own knowledge of documents under its control and the facilities it is able to provide.

[0302] 11.8. Use of OS DRM Facilities

[0303] An increasing number of operating systems support some form of “Digital Rights Management”: the ability to control the use of particular data according to the rights granted to a particular user, software entity or machine. It may inhibit unauthorized copying or distribution of a particular document, for example.

12. User Interface

[0304] The user interface of the system may be entirely on a PC, if the capture device is relatively dumb and is connected to it by a cable, or entirely on the device, if it is sophisticated and with significant processing power of its own. In some cases, some functionality resides in each component. Part, or indeed all, of the system's functionality may also be implemented on other devices such as mobile phones or PDAs.

[0305] The descriptions in the following sections are therefore indications of what may be desirable in certain implementations, but they are not necessarily appropriate for all and may be modified in several ways.

[0306] 12.1. On the Capture Device

[0307] With all capture devices, but particularly in the case of an optical scanner, the user's attention will generally be on the device and the paper at the time of scanning. It is very desirable, then, that any input and feedback needed as part of the process of scanning do not require the user's attention to be elsewhere, for example on the screen of a computer, more than is necessary.

[0308] 12.1.1. Feedback on Scanner

[0309] A handheld scanner may have a variety of ways of providing feedback to the user about particular conditions. The most obvious types are direct visual, where the scanner incorporates indicator lights or even a full display, and auditory, where the scanner can make beeps, clicks or other sounds. Important alternatives include tactile feedback, where the scanner can vibrate, buzz, or otherwise stimulate the user's sense of touch, and projected feedback, where it indicates a status by projecting onto the paper anything from a colored spot of light to a sophisticated display.

[0310] Important immediate feedback that may be provided on the device includes:

- [0311] feedback on the scanning process—user scanning too fast, at too great an angle, or drifting too high or low on a particular line
- [0312] sufficient content—enough has been scanned to be pretty certain of finding a match if one exists—important for disconnected operation
- [0313] context known—a source of the text has been located
- [0314] unique context known—one unique source of the text has been located
- [0315] availability of content—indication of whether the content is freely available to the user, or at a cost

[0316] Many of the user interactions normally associated with the later stages of the system may also take place on the capture device if it has sufficient abilities, for example, to display part or all of a document.

[0317] 12.1.2. Controls on Scanner

[0318] The device may provide a variety of ways for the user to provide input in addition to basic text capture. Even when the device is in close association with a host machine that has input options such as keyboards and mice, it can be disruptive for the user to switch back and forth between manipulating the scanner and using a mouse, for example.

[0319] The handheld scanner may have buttons, scroll/jog-wheels, touch-sensitive surfaces, and/or accelerometers for detecting the movement of the device. Some of these allow a richer set of interactions while still holding the scanner.

[0320] For example, in response to scanning some text, the system presents the user with a set of several possible matching documents. The user uses a scroll-wheel on the side of the scanner is to select one from the list, and clicks a button to confirm the selection.

[0321] 12.1.3. Gestures

[0322] The primary reason for moving a scanner across the paper is to capture text, but some movements may be detected by the device and used to indicate other user intentions. Such movements are referred to herein as “gestures.”

[0323] As an example, the user can indicate a large region of text by scanning the first few words in conventional left-to-right order, and the last few in reverse order, i.e. right to left. The user can also indicate the vertical extent of the text of interest by moving the scanner down the page over several lines. A backwards scan might indicate cancellation of the previous scan operation.

[0324] 12.1.4. Online/Offline Behavior

[0325] Many aspects of the system may depend on network connectivity, either between components of the system such as a scanner and a host laptop, or with the outside world in the form of a connection to corporate databases and Internet search. This connectivity may not be present all the time, however, and so there will be occasions when part or all of the system may be considered to be “offline.” It is desirable to allow the system to continue to function usefully in those circumstances.

[0326] The device may be used to capture text when it is out of contact with other parts of the system. A very simple device may simply be able to store the image or audio data associated with the capture, ideally with a timestamp indicating when it was captured. The various captures may be uploaded to the rest of the system when the device is next in contact with it, and handled then. The device may also upload other data associated with the captures, for example voice annotations associated with optical scans, or location information.

[0327] More sophisticated devices may be able to perform some or all of the system operations themselves despite being disconnected. Various techniques for improving their ability to do so are discussed in Section 15.3. Often it will be the case that some, but not all, of the desired actions can be performed while offline. For example, the text may be recognized, but identification of the source may depend on a connection to an Internet-based search engine. In some embodiments, the device therefore stores sufficient information about how far each operation has progressed for the rest of the system to proceed efficiently when connectivity is restored.

[0328] The operation of the system will, in general, benefit from immediately available connectivity, but there are some situations in which performing several captures and then processing them as a batch can have advantages. For example, as discussed in Section 13 below, the identification of the source of a particular capture may be greatly enhanced by examining other captures made by the user at approximately the same time. In a fully connected system where live feedback is being provided to the user, the system is only able to use past captures when processing the current one. If the capture is one of a batch stored by the device when offline, however, the system will be able to take into account any data available from later captures as well as earlier ones when doing its analysis.

[0329] 12.2. On a Host Device

[0330] A scanner will often communicate with some other device, such as a PC, PDA, phone or digital camera to perform many of the functions of the system, including more detailed interactions with the user.

[0331] 12.2.1. Activities Performed in Response to a Capture

[0332] When the host device receives a capture, it may initiate a variety of activities. An incomplete list of possible activities performed by the system after locating and electronic counterpart document associated with the capture and a location within that document follows.

- [0333] The details of the capture may be stored in the user's history. (Section 6.1)
- [0334] The document may be retrieved from local storage or a remote location. (Section 8)
- [0335] The operating system's metadata and other records associated with the document may be updated. (Section 11.1)
- [0336] Markup associated with the document may be examined to determine the next relevant operations. (Section 5)
- [0337] A software application may be started to edit, view or otherwise operate on the document. The choice of application may depend on the source document, or on the contents of the scan, or on some other aspect of the capture. (Section 11.2.2, 11.2.3)
- [0338] The application may scroll to, highlight, move the insertion point to, or otherwise indicate the location of the capture. (Section 11.3)
- [0339] The precise bounds of the captured text may be modified, for example to select whole words, sentences or paragraphs around the captured text. (Section 11.3.2)
- [0340] The user may be given the option to copy the capture text to the clipboard or perform other standard operating system or application-specific operations upon it.
- [0341] Annotations may be associated with the document or the captured text. These may come from immediate user input, or may have been captured earlier, for example in the case of voice annotations associated with an optical scan. (Section 19.4)
- [0342] Markup may be examined to determine a set of further possible operations for the user to select.

[0343] 12.2.2. Contextual Popup Menus

[0344] Sometimes the appropriate action to be taken by the system will be obvious, but sometimes it will require a choice to be made by the user. One good way to do this is through the use of “popup menus” or, in cases where the content is also being displayed on a screen, with so-called “contextual menus” that appear close to the content. (See Section 11.3.3). In some embodiments, the scanner device projects a popup menu onto the paper document. A user may select from such menus using traditional methods such as a keyboard and mouse, or by using controls on the capture device (Section 12.1.2), gestures (Section 12.1.3), or by interacting with the computer display using the scanner (Section 12.2.4). In some embodiments, the popup menus which can appear as a result of a capture include default items representing actions which occur if the user does not respond—for example, if the user ignores the menu and makes another capture.

[0345] 12.2.3. Feedback on Disambiguation

[0346] When a user starts capturing text, there will initially be several documents or other text locations that it could match. As more text is captured, and other factors are taken into account (Section 13), the number of candidate locations will decrease until the actual location is identified, or further disambiguation is not possible without user input. In some embodiments, the system provides a real-time display of the documents or the locations found, for example in list, thumbnail-image or text-segment form, and for the number of elements in that display to reduce in number as capture continues. In some embodiments, the system displays thumbnails of all candidate documents, where the size or position of the thumbnail is dependent on the probability of it being the correct match.

[0347] When a capture is unambiguously identified, this fact may be emphasized to the user, for example using audio feedback.

[0348] Sometimes the text captured will occur in many documents and will be recognized to be a quotation. The system may indicate this on the screen, for example by grouping documents containing a quoted reference around the original source document.

[0349] 12.2.4. Scanning from Screen

[0350] Some optical scanners may be able to capture text displayed on a screen as well as on paper. Accordingly, the term rendered document is used herein to indicate that printing onto paper is not the only form of rendering, and that the capture of text or symbols for use by the system may be equally valuable when that text is displayed on an electronic display.

[0351] The user of the described system may be required to interact with a computer screen for a variety of other reasons, such as to select from a list of options. It can be inconvenient for the user to put down the scanner and start using the mouse or keyboard. Other sections have described physical controls on the scanner (Section 12.1.2) or gestures (Section 12.1.3) as methods of input which do not require this change of tool, but using the scanner on the screen itself to scan some text or symbol is an important alternative provided by the system.

[0352] In some embodiments, the optics of the scanner allow it to be used in a similar manner to a light-pen, directly sensing its position on the screen without the need for actual scanning of text, possibly with the aid of special hardware or software on the computer.

13. Context Interpretation

[0353] An important aspect of the described system is the use of other factors, beyond the simple capture of a string of text, to help identify the document in use. A capture of a modest amount of text may often identify the document uniquely, but in many situations it will identify a few candidate documents. One solution is to prompt the user to confirm the document being scanned, but a preferable alternative is to make use of other factors to narrow down the possibilities automatically. Such supplemental information can dramatically reduce the amount of text that needs to be captured and/or increase the reliability and speed with which the location in the electronic counterpart can be identified. This extra material is referred to as “context,” and it was discussed briefly in Section 4.2.2. We now consider it in more depth.

[0354] 13.1. System and Capture Context

[0355] Perhaps the most important example of such information is the user's capture history.

[0356] It is highly probable that any given capture comes from the same document as the previous one, or from an associated document, especially if the previous capture took place in the last few minutes (Section 6.1.2). Conversely, if the system detects that the font has changed between two scans, it is more likely that they are from different documents.

[0357] Also useful are the user's longer-term capture history and reading habits. These can also be used to develop a model of the user's interests and associations.

[0358] 13.2. User's Real-World Context

[0359] Another example of useful context is the user's geographical location. A user in Paris is much more likely to be reading Le Monde than the Seattle Times, for example. The timing, size and geographical distribution of printed versions of the documents can therefore be important, and can to some degree be deduced from the operation of the system.

[0360] The time of day may also be relevant, for example in the case of a user who always reads one type of publication on the way to work, and a different one at lunchtime or on the train going home.

[0361] 13.3. Related Digital Context

[0362] The user's recent use of electronic documents, including those searched for or retrieved by more conventional means, can also be a helpful indicator.

[0363] In some cases, such as on a corporate network, other factors may be usefully considered:

- [0364] Which documents have been printed recently?
- [0365] Which documents have been modified recently on the corporate file server?
- [0366] Which documents have been emailed recently?

[0367] All of these examples might suggest that a user was more likely to be reading a paper version of those documents. In contrast, if the repository in which a document resides can affirm that the document has never been printed or sent anywhere where it might have been printed, then it can be safely eliminated in any searches originating from paper.

[0368] 13.4. Other Statistics—the Global Context

[0369] Section 14 covers the analysis of the data stream resulting from paper-based searches, but it should be noted here that statistics about the popularity of documents with other readers, about the timing of that popularity, and about the parts of documents most frequently scanned are all examples of further factors which can be beneficial in the search process. The system brings the possibility of Google-type page-ranking to the world of paper.

[0370] See also Section 4.2.2 for some other implications of the use of context for search engines.

14. Data-Stream Analysis

[0371] The use of the system generates an exceedingly valuable data-stream as a side effect. This stream is a record of what users are reading and when, and is in many cases a record of what they find particularly valuable in the things they read. Such data has never really been available before for paper documents.

[0372] Some ways in which this data can be useful for the system, and for the user of the system, are described in Section 6.1. This section concentrates on its use for others. There are, of course, substantial privacy issues to be considered with any distribution of data about what people are reading, but such issues as preserving the anonymity of data are well known to those of skill in the art.

[0373] 14.1. Document Tracking

[0374] When the system knows which documents any given user is reading, it can also deduce who is reading any given document. This allows the tracking of a document through an organization, to allow analysis, for example, of who is reading it and when, how widely it was distributed, how long that distribution took, and who has seen current versions while others are still working from out-of-date copies.

[0375] For published documents that have a wider distribution, the tracking of individual copies is more difficult, but the analysis of the distribution of readership is still possible.

[0376] 14.2. Read Ranking—Popularity of Documents and Sub-Regions

[0377] In situations where users are capturing text or other data that is of particular interest to them, the system can deduce the popularity of certain documents and of particular sub-regions of those documents. This forms a valuable input to the system itself (Section 4.2.2) and an important source of information for authors, publishers and advertisers (Section 7.6, Section 10.5). This data is also useful when integrated in search engines and search indices—for example, to assist in ranking search results for queries coming from rendered documents, and/or to assist in ranking conventional queries typed into a web browser.

[0378] 14.3. Analysis of Users—Building Profiles

[0379] Knowledge of what a user is reading enables the system to create a quite detailed model of the user's interests and activities. This can be useful on an abstract statistical basis—“35% of users who buy this newspaper also read the latest book by that author”—but it can also allow other interactions with the individual user, as discussed below.

[0380] 14.3.1. Social Networking

[0381] One example is connecting one user with others who have related interests. These may be people already known to the user. The system may ask a university professor, “Did you know that your colleague at XYZ University has also just read this paper?” The system may ask a user, “Do you want to be linked up with other people in your neighborhood who are also how reading Jane Eyre?” Such links may be the basis for the automatic formation of book clubs and similar social structures, either in the physical world or online.

[0382] 14.3.2. Marketing

[0383] Section 10.6 has already mentioned the idea of offering products and services to an individual user based on their interactions with the system. Current online booksellers, for example, often make recommendations to a user based on their previous interactions with the bookseller. Such recommendations become much more useful when they are based on interactions with the actual books.

[0384] 14.4. Marketing Based on Other Aspects of the Data-Stream

[0385] We have discussed some of the ways in which the system may influence those publishing documents, those advertising through them, and other sales initiated from paper (Section 10). Some commercial activities may have no direct interaction with the paper documents at all and yet may be influenced by them. For example, the knowledge that people in one community spend more time reading the sports section of the newspaper than they do the financial section might be of interest to somebody setting up a health club.

[0386] 14.5. Types of Data that may be Captured

[0387] In addition to the statistics discussed, such as who is reading which bits of which documents, and when and where, it can be of interest to examine the actual contents of the text captured, regardless of whether or not the document has been located.

[0388] In many situations, the user will also not just be capturing some text, but will be causing some action to occur as a result. It might be emailing a reference to the document to an acquaintance, for example. Even in the absence of information about the identity of the user or the recipient of the email, the knowledge that somebody considered the document worth emailing is very useful.

[0389] In addition to the various methods discussed for deducing the value of a particular document or piece of text, in some circumstances the user will explicitly indicate the value by assigning it a rating.

[0390] Lastly, when a particular set of users are known to form a group, for example when they are known to be employees of a particular company, the aggregated statistics of that group can be used to deduce the importance of a particular document to that group.

15. Device Features and Functions

[0391] A capture device for use with the system needs little more than a way of capturing text from a rendered version of the document. As described earlier (Section 1.2), this capture may be achieved through a variety of methods including taking a photograph of part of the document or typing some words into a mobile phone keypad. This capture may be achieved using a small hand-held optical scanner capable of recording a line or two of text at a time, or an audio capture device such as a voice-recorder into which the user is reading text from the document. The device used may be a combination of these—an optical scanner which could also record voice annotations, for example—and the capturing functionality may be built into some other device such as a mobile phone, PDA, digital camera or portable music player.

[0392] 15.1. Input and Output

[0393] Many of the possibly beneficial additional input and output facilities for such a device have been described in Section 12.1. They include buttons, scroll-wheels and touch-pads for input, and displays, indicator lights, audio and tactile transducers for output. Sometimes the device will incorporate many of these, sometimes very few. Sometimes the capture device will be able to communicate with another device that already has them (Section 15.6), for example using a wireless link, and sometimes the capture functionality will be incorporated into such other device (Section 15.7).

[0394] 15.2. Connectivity

[0395] In some embodiments, the device implements the majority of the system itself. In some embodiments, however, it often communicates with a PC or other computing device and with the wider world using communications facilities.

[0396] Often these communications facilities are in the form of a general-purpose data network such as Ethernet, 802.11 or UWB or a standard peripheral-connecting network such as USB, IEEE-1394 (Firewire), Bluetooth™ or infra-red. When a wired connection such as Firewire or USB is used, the device may receive electrical power though the same connection. In some circumstances, the capture device may appear to a connected machine to be a conventional peripheral such as a USB storage device.

[0397] Lastly, the device may in some circumstances “dock” with another device, either to be used in conjunction with that device or for convenient storage.

[0398] 15.3. Caching and Other Online/Offline Functionality

[0399] Sections 3.5 and 12.1.4 have raised the topic of disconnected operation. When a capture device has a limited subset of the total system's functionality, and is not in communication with the other parts of the system, the device can still be useful, though the functionality available will sometimes be reduced. At the simplest level, the device can record the raw image or audio data being captured and this can be processed later. For the user's benefit, however, it can be important to give feedback where possible about whether the data captured is likely to be sufficient for the task in hand, whether it can be recognized or is likely to be recognizable, and whether the source of the data can be identified or is likely to be identifiable later. The user will then know whether their capturing activity is worthwhile. Even when all of the above are unknown, the raw data can still be stored so that, at the very least, the user can refer to them later. The user may be presented with the image of a scan, for example, when the scan cannot be recognized by the OCR process.

[0400] To illustrate some of the range of options available, both a rather minimal optical scanning device and then a much more full-featured one are described below. Many devices occupy a middle ground between the two.

[0401] 15.3.1. The SimpleScanner—a Low-End Offline Example

[0402] The SimpleScanner has a scanning head able to read pixels from the page as it is moved along the length of a line of text. It can detect its movement along the page and record the pixels with some information about the movement. It also has a clock, which allows each scan to be time-stamped. The clock is synchronized with a host device when the SimpleScanner has connectivity. The clock may not represent the actual time of day, but relative times may be determined from it so that the host can deduce the actual time of a scan, or at worst the elapsed time between scans.

[0403] The SimpleScanner does not have sufficient processing power to perform any OCR itself, but it does have some basic knowledge about typical word-lengths, word-spacings, and their relationship to font size. It has some basic indicator lights which tell the user whether the scan is likely to be readable, whether the head is being moved too fast, too slowly or too inaccurately across the paper, and when it determines that sufficient words of a given size are likely to have been scanned for the document to be identified.

[0404] The SimpleScanner has a USB connector and can be plugged into the USB port on a computer, where it will be recharged. To the computer it appears to be a USB storage device on which time-stamped data files have been recorded, and the rest of the system software takes over from this point.

[0405] 15.3.2. The SuperScanner—a High-End Offline Example

[0406] The SuperScanner also depends on connectivity for its full operation, but it has a significant amount of on-board storage and processing which can help it make better judgments about the data captured while offline.

[0407] As it moves along the line of text, the captured pixels are stitched together and passed to an OCR engine that attempts to recognize the text. A number of fonts, including those from the user's most-read publications, have been downloaded to it to help perform this task, as has a dictionary that is synchronized with the user's spelling-checker dictionary on their PC and so contains many of the words they frequently encounter. Also stored on the scanner is a list of words and phrases with the typical frequency of their use—this may be combined with the dictionary. The scanner can use the frequency statistics both to help with the recognition process and also to inform its judgment about when a sufficient quantity of text has been captured; more frequently used phrases are less likely to be useful as the basis for a search query.

[0408] In addition, the full index for the articles in the recent issues of the newspapers and periodicals most commonly read by the user are stored on the device, as are the indices for the books the user has recently purchased from an online bookseller, or from which the user has scanned anything within the last few months. Lastly, the titles of several thousand of the most popular publications which have data available for the system are stored so that, in the absence of other information the user can scan the title and have a good idea as to whether or not captures from a particular work are likely to be retrievable in electronic form later.

[0409] During the scanning process, the system informs user that the captured data has been of sufficient quality and of a sufficient nature to make it probable that the electronic copy can be retrieved when connectivity is restored. Often the system indicates to the user that the scan is known to have been successful and that the context has been recognized in one of the on-board indices, or that the publication concerned is known to be making its data available to the system, so the later retrieval ought to be successful.

[0410] The SuperScanner docks in a cradle connected to a PC's Firewire or USB port, at which point, in addition to the upload of captured data, its various onboard indices and other databases are updated based on recent user activity and new publications. It also has the facility to connect to wireless public networks or to communicate via Bluetooth to a mobile phone and thence with the public network when such facilities are available.

[0411] 15.4. Features for Optical Scanning

[0412] We now consider some of the features that may be particularly desirable in an optical scanner device.

[0413] 15.4.1. Flexible Positioning and Convenient Optics

[0414] One of the reasons for the continuing popularity of paper is the ease of its use in a wide variety of situations where a computer, for example, would be impractical or inconvenient. A device intended to capture a substantial part of a user's interaction with paper should therefore be similarly convenient in use. This has not been the case for scanners in the past; even the smallest hand-held devices have been somewhat unwieldy. Those designed to be in contact with the page have to be held at a precise angle to the paper and moved very carefully along the length of the text to be scanned. This is acceptable when scanning a business report on an office desk, but may be impractical when scanning a phrase from a novel while waiting for a train. Scanners based on camera-type optics that operate at a distance from the paper may similarly be useful in some circumstances.

[0415] Some embodiments of the system use a scanner that scans in contact with the paper, and which, instead of lenses, uses an image conduit a bundle of optical fibers to transmit the image from the page to the optical sensor device. Such a device can be shaped to allow it to be held in a natural position; for example, in some embodiments, the part in contact with the page is wedge-shaped, allowing the user's hand to move more naturally over the page in a movement similar to the use of a highlighter pen. The conduit is either in direct contact with the paper or in close proximity to it, and may have a replaceable transparent tip that can protect the image conduit from possible damage. As has been mentioned in Section 12.2.4, the scanner may be used to scan from a screen as well as from paper, and the material of the tip can be chosen to reduce the likelihood of damage to such displays.

[0416] Lastly, some embodiments of the device will provide feedback to the user during the scanning process which will indicate through the use of light, sound or tactile feedback when the user is scanning too fast, too slow, too unevenly or is drifting too high or low on the scanned line.

[0417] 15.5. Security, Identity, Authentication, Personalization and Billing

[0418] As described in Section 6, the capture device may form an important part of identification and authorization for secure transactions, purchases, and a variety of other operations. It may therefore incorporate, in addition to the circuitry and software required for such a role, various hardware features that can make it more secure, such as a smartcard reader, RFID, or a keypad on which to type a PIN.

[0419] It may also include various biometric sensors to help identify the user. In the case of an optical scanner, for example, the scanning head may also be able to read a fingerprint. For a voice recorder, the voice pattern of the user may be used.

[0420] 15.6. Device Associations

[0421] In some embodiments, the device is able to form an association with other nearby devices to increase either its own or their functionality. In some embodiments, for example, it uses the display of a nearby PC or phone to give more detailed feedback about its operation, or uses their network connectivity. The device may, on the other hand, operate in its role as a security and identification device to authenticate operations performed by the other device. Or it may simply form an association in order to function as a peripheral to that device.

[0422] An interesting aspect of such associations is that they may be initiated and authenticated using the capture facilities of the device. For example, a user wishing to identify themselves securely to a public computer terminal may use the scanning facilities of the device to scan a code or symbol displayed on a particular area of the terminal's screen and so effect a key transfer. An analogous process may be performed using audio signals picked up by a voice-recording device.

[0423] 15.7. Integration with Other Devices

[0424] In some embodiments, the functionality of the capture device is integrated into some other device that is already in use. The integrated devices may be able to share a power supply, data capture and storage capabilities, and network interfaces. Such integration may be done simply for convenience, to reduce cost, or to enable functionality that would not otherwise be available.

[0425] Some examples of devices into which the capture functionality can be integrated include:

- [0426] an existing peripheral such as a mouse, a stylus, a USB “webcam” camera, a Bluetooth™ headset or a remote control
- [0427] another processing/storage device, such as a PDA, an MP3 player, a voice recorder, a digital camera or a mobile phone
- [0428] other often-carried items, just for convenience—a watch, a piece of jewelry, a pen, a car key fob

[0429] 15.7.1. Mobile Phone Integration

[0430] As an example of the benefits of integration, we consider the use of a modified mobile phone as the capture device.

[0431] In some embodiments, the phone hardware is not modified to support the system, such as where the text capture can be adequately done through voice recognition, where they can either be processed by the phone itself, or handled by a system at the other end of a telephone call, or stored in the phone's memory for future processing. Many modern phones have the ability to download software that could implement some parts of the system. Such voice capture is likely to be suboptimal in many situations, however, for example when there is substantial background noise, and accurate voice recognition is a difficult task at the best of times. The audio facilities may best be used to capture voice annotations.

[0432] In some embodiments, the camera built into many mobile phones is used to capture an image of the text. The phone display, which would normally act as a viewfinder for the camera, may overlay on the live camera image information about the quality of the image and its suitability for OCR, which segments of text are being captured, and even a transcription of the text if the OCR can be performed on the phone.

[0433] In some embodiments, the phone is modified to add dedicated capture facilities, or to provide such functionality in a clip-on adaptor or a separate Bluetooth-connected peripheral in communication with the phone. Whatever the nature of the capture mechanism, the integration with a modern cellphone has many other advantages. The phone has connectivity with the wider world, which means that queries can be submitted to remote search engines or other parts of the system, and copies of documents may be retrieved for immediate storage or viewing. A phone typically has sufficient processing power for many of the functions of the system to be performed locally, and sufficient storage to capture a reasonable amount of data. The amount of storage can also often be expanded by the user. Phones have reasonably good displays and audio facilities to provide user feedback, and often a vibrate function for tactile feedback. They also have good power supplies.

[0434] Most significantly of all, they are a device that most users are already carrying.

Part III—Example Applications of the System

[0435] This section lists example uses of the system and applications that may be built on it. This list is intended to be purely illustrative and in no sense exhaustive.

16. Personal Applications

[0436] 16.1. Life Library

[0437] The Life Library (see also Section 6.1.1) is a digital archive of any important documents that the subscriber wishes to save and is a set of embodiments of services of this system. Important books, magazine articles, newspaper clippings, etc., can all be saved in digital form in the Life Library. Additionally, the subscriber's annotations, comments, and notes can be saved with the documents. The Life Library can be accessed via the Internet and World Wide Web.

[0438] The system creates and manages the Life Library document archive for subscribers. The subscriber indicates which documents the subscriber wishes to have saved in his life library by scanning information from the document or by otherwise indicating to the system that the particular document is to be added to the subscriber's Life Library. The scanned information is typically text from the document but can also be a barcode or other code identifying the document. The system accepts the code and uses it to identify the source document. After the document is identified the system can store either a copy of the document in the user's Life Library or a link to a source where the document may be obtained.

[0439] One embodiment of the Life Library system can check whether the subscriber is authorized to obtain the electronic copy. For example, if a reader scans text or an identifier from a copy of an article in the New York Times (NYT) so that the article will be added to the reader's Life Library, the Life Library system will verify with the NYT whether the reader is subscribed to the online version of the NYT; if so, the reader gets a copy of the article stored in his Life Library account; if not, information identifying the document and how to order it is stored in his Life Library account.

[0440] In some embodiments, the system maintains a subscriber profile for each subscriber that includes access privilege information. Document access information can be compiled in several ways, two of which are: 1) the subscriber supplies the document access information to the Life Library system, along with his account names and passwords, etc., or 2) the Life Library service provider queries the publisher with the subscriber's information and the publisher responds by providing access to an electronic copy if the Life Library subscriber is authorized to access the material. If the Life Library subscriber is not authorized to have an electronic copy of the document, the publisher provides a price to the Life Library service provider, which then provides the customer with the option to purchase the electronic document. If so, the Life Library service provider either pays the publisher directly and bills the Life Library customer later or the Life Library service provider immediately bills the customer's credit card for the purchase. The Life Library service provider would get a percentage of the purchase price or a small fixed fee for facilitating the transaction.

[0441] The system can archive the document in the subscriber's personal library and/or any other library to which the subscriber has archival privileges. For example, as a user scans text from a printed document, the Life Library system can identify the rendered document and its electronic counterpart. After the source document is identified, the Life Library system might record information about the source document in the user's personal library and in a group library to which the subscriber has archival privileges. Group libraries are collaborative archives such as a document repository for: a group working together on a project, a group of academic researchers, a group web log, etc.

[0442] The life library can be organized in many ways: chronologically, by topic, by level of the subscriber's interest, by type of publication (newspaper, book, magazine, technical paper, etc.), where read, when read, by ISBN or by Dewey decimal, etc. In one alternative, the system can learn classifications based on how other subscribers have classified the same document. The system can suggest classifications to the user or automatically classify the document for the user.

[0443] In various embodiments, annotations may be inserted directly into the document or may be maintained in a separate file. For example, when a subscriber scans text from a newspaper article, the article is archived in his Life Library with the scanned text highlighted. Alternatively, the article is archived in his Life Library along with an associated annotation file (thus leaving the archived document unmodified). Embodiments of the system can keep a copy of the source document in each subscriber's library, a copy in a master library that many subscribers can access, or link to a copy held by the publisher.

[0444] In some embodiments, the Life Library stores only the user's modifications to the document (e.g., highlights, etc.) and a link to an online version of the document (stored elsewhere). The system or the subscriber merges the changes with the document when the subscriber subsequently retrieves the document.

[0445] If the annotations are kept in a separate file, the source document and the annotation file are provided to the subscriber and the subscriber combines them to create a modified document. Alternatively, the system combines the two files prior to presenting them to the subscriber. In another alternative, the annotation file is an overlay to the document file and can be overlaid on the document by software in the subscriber's computer.

[0446] Subscribers to the Life Library service pay a monthly fee to have the system maintain the subscriber's archive. Alternatively, the subscriber pays a small amount (e.g., a micro-payment) for each document stored in the archive. Alternatively, the subscriber pays to access the subscriber's archive on a per-access fee. Alternatively, subscribers can compile libraries and allow others to access the materials/annotations on a revenue share model with the Life Library service provider and copyright holders. Alternatively, the Life Library service provider receives a payment from the publisher when the Life Library subscriber orders a document (a revenue share model with the publisher, where the Life Library service provider gets a share of the publisher's revenue).

[0447] In some embodiments, the Life Library service provider acts as an intermediary between the subscriber and the copyright holder (or copyright holder's agent, such as the Copyright Clearance Center, a.k.a. CCC) to facilitate billing and payment for copyrighted materials. The Life Library service provider uses the subscriber's billing information and other user account information to provide this intermediation service. Essentially, the Life Library service provider leverages the pre-existing relationship with the subscriber to enable purchase of copyrighted materials on behalf of the subscriber.

[0448] In some embodiments, the Life Library system can store excerpts from documents. For example, when a subscriber scans text from a paper document, the regions around the scanned text are excerpted and placed in the Life Library, rather than the entire document being archived in the life library. This is especially advantageous when the document is long because preserving the circumstances of the original scan prevents the subscriber from re-reading the document to find the interesting portions. Of course, a hyperlink to the entire electronic counterpart of the paper document can be included with the excerpt materials.

[0449] In some embodiments, the system also stores information about the document in the Life Library, such as author, publication title, publication date, publisher, copyright holder (or copyright holder's licensing agent), ISBN, links to public annotations of the document, readrank, etc. Some of this additional information about the document is a form of paper document metadata. Third parties may create public annotation files for access by persons other than themselves, such the general public. Linking to a third party's commentary on a document is advantageous because reading annotation files of other users enhances the subscriber's understanding of the document.

[0450] In some embodiments, the system archives materials by class. This feature allows a Life Library subscriber to quickly store electronic counterparts to an entire class of paper documents without access to each paper document. For example, when the subscriber scans some text from a copy of National Geographic magazine, the system provides the subscriber with the option to archive all back issues of the National Geographic. If the subscriber elects to archive all back issues, the Life Library service provider would then verify with the National Geographic Society whether the subscriber is authorized to do so. If not, the Life Library service provider can mediate the purchase of the right to archive the National Geographic magazine collection.

[0451] 16.2. Life Saver

[0452] A variation on, or enhancement of, the Life Library concept is the “Life Saver,” where the system uses the text captured by a user to deduce more about their other activities. The scanning of a menu from a particular restaurant, a program from a particular theater performance, a timetable at a particular railway station, or an article from a local newspaper allows the system to make deductions about the user's location and social activities, and could construct an automatic diary for them, for example as a website. The user would be able to edit and modify the diary, add additional materials such as photographs and, of course, look again at the items scanned.

17. Academic Applications

[0453] Portable scanners supported by the described system have many compelling uses in the academic setting. They can enhance student/teacher interaction and augment the learning experience. Among other uses, students can annotate study materials to suit their unique needs; teachers can monitor classroom performance; and teachers can automatically verify source materials cited in student assignments.

[0454] 17.1. Children's Books

[0455] A child's interaction with a paper document, such as a book, is monitored by a literacy acquisition system that employs a specific set of embodiments of this system. The child uses a portable scanner that communicates with other elements of the literacy acquisition system. In addition to the portable scanner, the literacy acquisition system includes a computer having a display and speakers, and a database accessible by the computer. The scanner is coupled with the computer (hardwired, short range RF, etc.). When the child sees an unknown word in the book, the child scans it with the scanner. In one embodiment, the literacy acquisition system compares the scanned text with the resources in its database to identify the word. The database includes a dictionary, thesaurus, and/or multimedia files (e.g., sound, graphics, etc.). After the word has been identified, the system uses the computer speakers to pronounce the word and its definition to the child. In another embodiment, the word and its definition are displayed by the literacy acquisition system on the computer's monitor. Multimedia files about the scanned word can also be played through the computer's monitor and speakers. For example, if a child reading “Goldilocks and the Three Bears” scanned the word “bear,” the system might pronounce the word “bear” and play a short video about bears on the computer's monitor. In this way, the child learns to pronounce the written word and is visually taught what the word means via the multimedia presentation.

[0456] The literacy acquisition system provides immediate auditory and/or visual information to enhance the learning process. The child uses this supplementary information to quickly acquire a deeper understanding of the written material. The system can be used to teach beginning readers to read, to help children acquire a larger vocabulary, etc. This system provides the child with information about words with which the child is unfamiliar or about which the child wants more information.

[0457] 17.2. Literacy Acquisition

[0458] In some embodiments, the system compiles personal dictionaries. If the reader sees a word that is new, interesting, or particularly useful or troublesome, the reader saves it (along with its definition) to a computer file. This computer file becomes the reader's personalized dictionary. This dictionary is generally smaller in size than a general dictionary so can be downloaded to a mobile station or associated device and thus be available even when the system isn't immediately accessible. In some embodiments, the personal dictionary entries include audio files to assist with proper word pronunciation and information identifying the paper document from which the word was scanned.

[0459] In some embodiments, the system creates customized spelling and vocabulary tests for students. For example, as a student reads an assignment, the student may scan unfamiliar words with the portable scanner. The system stores a list of all the words that the student has scanned. Later, the system administers a customized spelling/vocabulary test to the student on an associated monitor (or prints such a test on an associated printer).

[0460] 17.3. Music Teaching

[0461] The arrangement of notes on a musical staff is similar to the arrangement of letters in a line of text. The same scanning device discussed for capturing text in this system can be used to capture music notation, and an analogous process of constructing a search against databases of known musical pieces would allow the piece from which the capture occurred to be identified which can then be retrieved, played, or be the basis for some further action.

[0462] 17.4. Detecting Plagiarism

[0463] Teachers can use the system to detect plagiarism or to verify sources by scanning text from student papers and submitting the scanned text to the system. For example, a teacher who wishes to verify that a quote in a student paper came from the source that the student cited can scan a portion of the quote and compare the title of the document identified by the system with the title of the document cited by the student. Likewise, the system can use scans of text from assignments submitted as the student's original work to reveal if the text was instead copied.

[0464] 17.5. Enhanced Textbook

[0465] In some embodiments, capturing text from an academic textbook links students or staff to more detailed explanations, further exercises, student and staff discussions about the material, related example past exam questions, further reading on the subject, recordings of the lectures on the subject, and so forth. (See also Section 7.1.)

[0466] 17.6. Language Learning

[0467] In some embodiments, the system is used to teach foreign languages. Scanning a Spanish word, for example, might cause the word to be read aloud in Spanish along with its definition in English.

[0468] The system provides immediate auditory and/or visual information to enhance the new language acquisition process. The reader uses this supplementary information to acquire quickly a deeper understanding of the material. The system can be used to teach beginning students to read foreign languages, to help students acquire a larger vocabulary, etc. The system provides information about foreign words with which the reader is unfamiliar or for which the reader wants more information.

[0469] Reader interaction with a paper document, such as a newspaper or book, is monitored by a language skills system. The reader has a portable scanner that communicates with the language skills system. In some embodiments, the language skills system includes a computer having a display and speakers, and a database accessible by the computer. The scanner communicates with the computer (hardwired, short range RF, etc.). When the reader sees an unknown word in an article, the reader scans it with the scanner. The database includes a foreign language dictionary, thesaurus, and/or multimedia files (sound, graphics, etc.). In one embodiment, the system compares the scanned text with the resources in its database to identify the scanned word. After the word has been identified, the system uses the computer speakers to pronounce the word and its definition to the reader. In some embodiments, the word and its definition are both displayed on the computer's monitor. Multimedia files about grammar tips related to the scanned word can also be played through the computer's monitor and speakers. For example, if the words “to speak” are scanned, the system might pronounce the word “hablar,” play a short audio clip that demonstrates the proper Spanish pronunciation, and display a complete list of the various conjugations of “hablar.” In this way, the student learns to pronounce the written word, is visually taught the spelling of the word via the multimedia presentation, and learns how to conjugate the verb. The system can also present grammar tips about the proper usage of “hablar” along with common phrases.

[0470] In some embodiments, the user scans a word or short phrase from a rendered document in a language other than the user's native language (or some other language that the user knows reasonably well). In some embodiments, the system maintains a prioritized list of the user's “preferred” languages. The system identifies the electronic counterpart of the rendered document, and determines the location of the scan within the document. The system also identifies a second electronic counterpart of the document that has been translated into one of the user's preferred languages, and determines the location in the translated document corresponding to the location of the scan in the original document. When the corresponding location is not known precisely, the system identifies a small region (e.g., a paragraph) that includes the corresponding location of the scanned location. The corresponding translated location is then presented to the user. This provides the user with a precise translation of the particular usage at the scanned location, including any slang or other idiomatic usage that is often difficult to accurately translate on a word-by-word basis.

[0471] 17.7. Gathering Research Materials

[0472] A user researching a particular topic may encounter all sorts of material, both in print and on screen, which they might wish to record as relevant to the topic in some personal archive. The system would enable this process to be automatic as a result of scanning a short phrase in any piece of material, and could also create a bibliography suitable for insertion into a publication on the subject.

18. Commercial Applications

[0473] Obviously, commercial activities could be made out of almost any process discussed in this document, but here we concentrate on a few obvious revenue streams.

[0474] 18.1. Fee-Based Searching and Indexing

[0475] Conventional Internet search engines typically provide free search of electronic documents, and also make no charge to the content providers for including their content in the index. In some embodiments, the system provides for charges to users and/or payments to search engines and/or content providers in connection with the operation and use of the system.

[0476] In some embodiments, subscribers to the system's services pay a fee for searches originating from scans of paper documents. For example, a stockbroker may be reading a Wall Street Journal article about a new product offered by Company X. By scanning the Company X name from the paper document and agreeing to pay the necessary fees, the stockbroker uses the system to search special or proprietary databases to obtain premium information about the company, such as analyst's reports. The system can also make arrangements to have priority indexing of the documents most likely to be read in paper form, for example by making sure all of the newspapers published on a particular day are indexed and available by the time they hit the streets.

[0477] Content providers may pay a fee to be associated with certain terms in search queries submitted from paper documents. For example, in one embodiment, the system chooses a most preferred content provider based on additional context about the provider (the context being, in this case, that the content provider has paid a fee to be moved up the results list). In essence, the search provider is adjusting paper document search results based on pre-existing financial arrangements with a content provider. See also the description of keywords and key phrases in Section 5.2.

[0478] Where access to particular content is to be restricted to certain groups of people (such as clients or employees), such content may be protected by a firewall and thus not generally indexable by third parties. The content provider may nonetheless wish to provide an index to the protected content. In such a case, the content provider can pay a service provider to provide the content provider's index to system subscribers. For example, a law firm may index all of a client's documents. The documents are stored behind the law firm's firewall. However, the law firm wants its employees and the client to have access to the documents through the portable scanner so it provides the index (or a pointer to the index) to the service provider, which in turn searches the law firm's index when employees or clients of the law firm submit paper-scanned search terms via their portable scanners. The law firm can provide a list of employees and/or clients to the service provider's system to enable this function or the system can verify access rights by querying the law firm prior to searching the law firm's index. Note that in the preceding example, the index provided by the law firm is only of that client's documents, not an index of all documents at the law firm. Thus, the service provider can only grant the law firm's clients access to the documents that the law firm indexed for the client.

[0479] There are at least two separate revenue streams that can result from searches originating from paper documents: one revenue stream from the search function, and another from the content delivery function. The search function revenue can be generated from paid subscriptions from the scanner users, but can also be generated on a per-search charge. The content delivery revenue can be shared with the content provider or copyright holder (the service provider can take a percentage of the sale or a fixed fee, such as a micropayment, for each delivery), but also can be generated by a “referral” model in which the system gets a fee or percentage for every item that the subscriber orders from the online catalog and that the system has delivered or contributed to, regardless of whether the service provider intermediates the transaction. In some embodiments, the system service provider receives revenue for all purchases that the subscriber made from the content provider, either for some predetermined period of time or at any subsequent time when a purchase of an identified product is made.

[0480] 18.2. Catalogs

[0481] Consumers may use the portable scanner to make purchases from paper catalogs. The subscriber scans information from the catalog that identifies the catalog. This information is text from the catalog, a bar code, or another identifier of the catalog. The subscriber scans information identifying the products that s/he wishes to purchase. The catalog mailing label may contain a customer identification number that identifies the customer to the catalog vendor. If so, the subscriber can also scan this customer identification number. The system acts as an intermediary between the subscriber and the vendor to facilitate the catalog purchase by providing the customer's selection and customer identification number to the vendor.

[0482] 18.3. Coupons

[0483] A consumer scans paper coupons and saves an electronic copy of the coupon in the scanner, or in a remote device such as a computer, for later retrieval and use. An advantage of electronic storage is that the consumer is freed from the burden of carrying paper coupons. A further advantage is that the electronic coupons may be retrieved from any location. In some embodiments, the system can track coupon expiration dates, alert the consumer about coupons that will expire soon, and/or delete expired coupons from storage. An advantage for the issuer of the coupons is the possibility of receiving more feedback about who is using the coupons and when and where they are captured and used.

19. General Applications

[0484] 19.1. Forms

[0485] The system may be used to auto-populate an electronic document that corresponds to a paper form. A user scans in some text or a barcode that uniquely identifies the paper form. The scanner communicates the identity of the form and information identifying the user to a nearby computer. The nearby computer has an Internet connection. The nearby computer can access a first database of forms and a second database having information about the user of the scanner (such as a service provider's subscriber information database). The nearby computer accesses an electronic version of the paper form from the first database and auto-populates the fields of the form from the user's information obtained from the second database. The nearby computer then emails the completed form to the intended recipient. Alternatively, the computer could print the completed form on a nearby printer.

[0486] Rather than access an external database, in some embodiments, the system has a portable scanner that contains the user's information, such as in an identity module, SIM, or security card. The scanner provides information identifying the form to the nearby PC. The nearby PC accesses the electronic form and queries the scanner for any necessary information to fill out the form.

[0487] 19.2. Business Cards

[0488] The system can be used to automatically populate electronic address books or other contact lists from paper documents. For example, upon receiving a new acquaintance's business card, a user can capture an image of the card with his/her cellular phone. The system will locate an electronic copy of the card, which can be used to update the cellular phone's onboard address book with the new acquaintance's contact information. The electronic copy may contain more information about the new acquaintance than can be squeezed onto a business card. Further, the onboard address book may also store a link to the electronic copy such that any changes to the electronic copy will be automatically updated in the cell phone's address book. In this example, the business card optionally includes a symbol or text that indicates the existence of an electronic copy. If no electronic copy exists, the cellular phone can use OCR and knowledge of standard business card formats to fill out an entry in the address book for the new acquaintance. Symbols may also aid in the process of extracting information directly from the image. For example, a phone icon next to the phone number on the business card can be recognized to determine the location of the phone number.

[0489] 19.3. Proofreading/Editing

[0490] The system can enhance the proofreading and editing process. One way the system can enhance the editing process is by linking the editor's interactions with a paper document to its electronic counterpart. As an editor reads a paper document and scans various parts of the document, the system will make the appropriate annotations or edits to an electronic counterpart of the paper document. For example, if the editor scans a portion of text and makes the “new paragraph” control gesture with the scanner, a computer in communication with the scanner would insert a “new paragraph” break at the location of the scanned text in the electronic copy of the document.

[0491] 19.4. Voice Annotation

[0492] A user can make voice annotations to a document by scanning a portion of text from the document and then making a voice recording that is associated with the scanned text. In some embodiments, the scanner has a microphone to record the user's verbal annotations. After the verbal annotations are recorded, the system identifies the document from which the text was scanned, locates the scanned text within the document, and attaches the voice annotation at that point. In some embodiments, the system converts the speech to text and attaches the annotation as a textual comment.

[0493] In some embodiments, the system keeps annotations separate from the document, with only a reference to the annotation kept with the document. The annotations then become an annotation markup layer to the document for a specific subscriber or group of users.

[0494] In some embodiments, for each capture and associated annotation, the system identifies the document, opens it using a software package, scrolls to the location of the scan and plays the voice annotation. The user can then interact with a document while referring to voice annotations, suggested changes or other comments recorded either by themselves or by somebody else.

[0495] 19.5. Help In Text

[0496] The described system can be used to enhance paper documents with electronic help menus. In some embodiments, a markup layer associated with a paper document contains help menu information for the document. For example, when a user scans text from a certain portion of the document, the system checks the markup associated with the document and presents a help menu to the user. The help menu is presented on a display on the scanner or on an associated nearby display.

[0497] 19.6. Use with Displays

[0498] In some situations, it is advantageous to be able to scan information from a television, computer monitor, or other similar display. In some embodiments, the portable scanner is used to scan information from computer monitors and televisions. In some embodiments, the portable optical scanner has an illumination sensor that is optimized to work with traditional cathode ray tube (CRT) display techniques such as rasterizing, screen blanking, etc.

[0499] A voice capture device which operates by capturing audio of the user reading text from a document will typically work regardless of whether that document is on paper, on a display, or on some other medium.

[0500] 19.6.1. Public Kiosks and Dynamic Session IDs

[0501] One use of the direct scanning of displays is the association of devices as described in Section 15.6. For example, in some embodiments, a public kiosk displays a dynamic session ID on its monitor. The kiosk is connected to a communication network such as the Internet or a corporate intranet. The session ID changes periodically but at least every time that the kiosk is used so that a new session ID is displayed to every user. To use the kiosk, the subscriber scans in the session ID displayed on the kiosk; by scanning the session ID, the user tells the system that he wishes to temporarily associate the kiosk with his scanner for the delivery of content resulting from scans of printed documents or from the kiosk screen itself. The scanner may communicate the Session ID and other information authenticating the scanner (such as a serial number, account number, or other identifying information) directly to the system. For example, the scanner can communicate directly (where “directly” means without passing the message through the kiosk) with the system by sending the session initiation message through the user's cell phone (which is paired with the user's scanner via Bluetooth™). Alternatively, the scanner can establish a wireless link with the kiosk and use the kiosk's communication link by transferring the session initiation information to the kiosk (perhaps via short range RF such as Bluetooth™, etc.); in response, the kiosk sends the session initiation information to the system via its Internet connection.

[0502] The system can prevent others from using a device that is already associated with a scanner during the period (or session) in which the device is associated with the scanner. This feature is useful to prevent others from using a public kiosk before another person's session has ended. As an example of this concept related to use of a computer at an Internet café, the user scans a barcode on a monitor of a PC which s/he desires to use; in response, the system sends a session ID to the monitor that it displays; the user initiates the session by scanning the session ID from the monitor (or entering it via a keypad or touch screen or microphone on the portable scanner); and the system associates in its databases the session ID with the serial number (or other identifier that uniquely identifies the user's scanner) of his/her scanner so another scanner cannot scan the session ID and use the monitor during his/her session. The scanner is in communication (through wireless link such as Bluetooth™, a hardwired link such as a docking station, etc.) with a PC associated with the monitor or is in direct (i.e., w/o going through the PC) communication with the system via another means such as a cellular phone, etc.

Part IV—System Details

[0503] FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the typical environment in which embodiments of the system operate. The system functions in a distributed computing environment 400 that includes a plurality of devices interconnected by a wireless network 401, the Internet 402 or other networks (not shown). All these communications and connections are interconnected via suitable network connections using suitable network communication protocols. In various embodiments, the servers and other devices communicate with each other in accordance with respective APIs, which form additional embodiment of the system. In alternate embodiments, the devices and servers may communicate in accordance with open/standard protocols.

[0504] The servers and other devices include an OCR device 411 or other text capture device that is used to capture text from a rendered document 412; a wireless device 421 and/or a user device 422 to which the text capture device uploads various representations of captured text and other user input, and via which the system can provide various types of feedback to the user; a user account server 431 and associated user account database 432 in which the system manages user account information for the user; a search engine server 441 and an associated search database 442 that the system uses to perform queries containing text captured from a rendered document to identify positions in electronic documents in which the captured text occurs; and a document server 451 and an associated document database 452 from which the system retrieves copies of documents determined to contain the captured text. It will also be appreciated that while these servers are illustrated as single devices, each server may actually comprise more than a single device in an actual system practicing embodiments of the system. It will also be appreciated that the servers include file servers, database servers or a mixture that includes file servers and database servers. It will further be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, that while the various servers may be discussed as separate devices, in other embodiments of the system the servers may reside on a single device.

[0505] If the scanner incorporates a magnetic sensor, data can be coded in documents magnetically as well as optically, acoustically, tactually, etc.

[0506] Although the process of turning electronic documents into printed form has existed almost from the outset of computing, what has been lacking is an efficient way to reference back to the original digital sources of printed documents. In some embodiments, the system achieves this by scanning the desired position within a document to identify a distinctive text “signature,” where this signature provides information that can be used to locate the corresponding location within the original digital source document. The system sends this digital signature to a server that has access to database of electronic documents, which desirably includes an electronic version of the paper document in question (though, as explained below, useful outcomes can be obtained even when this is not the case). The server then identifies the corresponding location (or locations) in the electronic source document, connecting it with the original scan of the paper document. Establishing this relationship enables numerous useful innovations related to the use of printed documents in a variety of contexts. Various embodiment of the system are discussed below.

[0507] In one perspective, the system can be viewed as using auxiliary or augmenting information to transform document recognition into document navigation (e.g., finding a location and traversing portions of a document, and generating information for the traversal). Some of the many “hints” which the system may employ/discover include:

- [0508] How fast the user reads
- [0509] which direction the user reads
- [0510] What periodicals the user subscribes to
- [0511] The user's daily and weekly behavior (such as reading the Sunday paper on Sunday morning)
- [0512] Recent marks the user has made in this and other documents
- [0513] The types of materials/subjects which the user has been interested in historically
- [0514] An explicit user profile
- [0515] Current user location (as might be given by wireless environment, proximity to and/or activity on the user's PC, etc.)
- [0516] The nature of the text
- [0517] etc.

[0518] In many cases, the first marks a user makes in a document will be used to capture the typeface or font. The meaning of these character objects can then be determined by a (offset-based) template-matching plus disambiguation approach mentioned elsewhere, or by more conventional approaches. Once the current typeface or font is known, the device can capture and transmit actual text (e.g., ASCII), or it can use the (offset-based) template-matching representation mentioned elsewhere.

[0519] Because capital letters occur infrequently, in some embodiments, the system handles them in a special way. Because the system generally has a source or reference copy of the document available, the system can anticipate situations where capital letters (as well as punctuation) might or will occur.

[0520] In many cases there is no guarantee that a particular instance of a document will be rendered exactly as it appears in the source or reference copy. Nonetheless, the system can often infer how the rendered copy will handle these marks (capitals).

[0521] A good example is the capital letter that usually begins an English sentence. Because these are rare, it will not in general be easy to use template matching and disambiguation to interpret these initial capitals. One alternative solution is to essentially ignore capitals—by ignoring the first character of each new paragraph, sentence, etc.

[0522] And in the disambiguation process, capital letters and other infrequent marks are handled correctly automatically—in that characters which only occur once (don't repeat) are given a special default offset (e.g., a code of 0).

[0523] Note that when a special index is constructed from an offset-based representation (or other ambiguous representation), the uncertainty about the leading character can be anticipated—that is, the system knows from the source document that a capital will occur at a certain location, and that it will not match

[0524] This issue of capitals is a good example of how the system is distinguished from prior OCR systems. Because the system assumes (and in some cases depends on) a source document being (now or in future) available, various uncertainties and problems are dealt with easily. And because our focus is primarily document navigation, rather than interpretation, issues which would trip up a conventional OCR system (like needing to have special knowledge about the shapes of all capital letters in all fonts, etc.) do not cause problems for the system.

[0525] As an example, a user may wish to indicate the following sentence, which occurs in a rendered document: “Take as an example this sentence.” A conventional OCR system would seek to understand and interpret the letter “T”—in order to ascertain whether the first was “Take” or “Make” or “Fake” or “Rake”, etc. However, the system is only looking for distinguishing reference features for navigation purposes. The system can simply drop the “T” and search the source document for “ake as an example”—where this phrase might be represented as letters, offsets, or in another form. So long as the remainder of the phrase constitutes an identifying signature, the interpretation of the initial character is not essential.

[0526] Another perspective on this issue and distinction comes by understanding that conventional OCR was employed to recognize (i.e., interpret) text characters. For example, a user of an OCR pen moves the pen over a line of text to capture and interpret that text; the user of the system has a different intent. They would move their wand or scanning device over a line of text to *indicate* or “point to” this location in the document—and thus to enable many features and functions associated with that location in the document.

[0527] Moreover, when the user is interested in the specific underlying text, their action is generally to act on the text rather than to capture and interpret it. Thus the user might underline this text, change it to italics, excerpt it, place a bookmark at it, etc.

[0528] One useful function of the system is to place bookmarks, each indicating a location in the rendered document. Generally these can be used to find a location in a document at a later time. One simple but interesting application is to mark where the user last was reading in the document—very much in keeping with the traditional meaning of “bookmark”. It can be useful for the user to have easy access to this information—where they left off in a book or other document. This data might appear on the user's PC or PDA or cellular telephone. In some embodiments, the device itself indicates the last read location, such as by using a small LCD display in the device itself. In some embodiments, the display is binary—for example, an LED which is either on or off. This LED might be on if the user scans text which they have already read, and off if they scan new text. In this way the user can “hunt” for where the user left off.

[0529] FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to implement bookmarks. In step 501, the system receives text scanned by a user. In step 502, the system preprocesses the text scanned in step 501. In step 503, the system compares the scanned text to a document history maintained for the user. In step 504, if the scanned text was previously scanned by the user, then the system continues in step 505 to return an indication of the previous scan, else the system continues in step 506 to locate the scan in a document. In step 507, if the scan is located before the last bookmark, then the system continues in step 508 to return an indication of being previously read, else the facility continues in step 509 to return an indication of being previously unread.

[0530] A striking example of the new capabilities provided in the system in some embodiments can be seen in the historic uses of library books, school textbooks, etc. Writing in books—whether as margin notes, underlining and highlighting, or other forms, has always been a desire of readers. However, in the cases mentioned (and even in the user's own books) there is a huge barrier to making these marks—they interfere with other's (and sometimes the user's own) future enjoyment of the work. The system allows users to mark and annotate a book or document, yet at the same time choose to leave the original untouched.

[0531] One way to view the actions of the user in a particular document is as an overlay or transparency. Though the user is interacting with a physical rendering of a document, their marks are virtual—that is, they are captured and saved electronically, so no physical mark needs to appear in the rendered version. In some embodiments, however, the system employs text capture devices that have an integrated highlighter or pen. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a scanning device that has an integrated highlighter and pen. It can be seen that scan device 600 contains both a highlighter 601 and a pen 602, which are optionally retractable.

[0532] This overlay can thus be thought of as an abstract, virtual layer. This layer can then be merged with or “overlaid” on the source or reference version of the document. In one example, this would occur when the user views the reference document on their computer screen—where the overlaid data from the user's actions would appear on top of, or integrated into, the reference document. Note that the reference document does not need to be modified to be displayed in this way. In some embodiments, the overlay information is combined with the reference or source document when the user prints the document. In some embodiments, the system applies the overlay to—or merges it into—the source document when it is delivered electronically to the user. For example, the source document and overlay might be combined into a PDF document and emailed to the user.

[0533] In either of these examples, because the user's overlaid information can be stored as a separate layer, the source document does not need to be changed. Thus many users can all mark and interact with a single copy of a document. The user's marks and notes are stored separately, so the original doesn't need to change.

[0534] Each user's data is typically small compared to the underlying document. Consider the case of highlighting: all that needs to be stored is the start and end location of the highlighted text in the document, and the highlight color. One way of storing this data is as character offsets from the start of the document. Another way is as an address like document:page:line. Alternatively, the system stores the actual x-y coordinates of the user's actions in the rendered document.

[0535] Documents used with the system sometimes carry a special mark (e.g., barcode, etc.) that the user can scan to indicate which issue or copy of the document is being scanned. This additional identifying information enables the system to determine which document the user has, and thus how it is rendered.

[0536] In some cases the system may require the user to scan an identifying code or mark to enable the user to interact with the document using the system. This may be required before the user has used the device on other parts of the document. Alternatively, the system may allow the user to interact with the document, but require that they perform an identifying scan at some future point. Or, in yet another alternative, the identifying scan may be optional; without it, the system may have additional ambiguity, i.e., less certainty about the specific document being used. With the extra scan, the system knows more about the specific document.

[0537] In some embodiments, the capture device provides an error indicator or signal (e.g., an LED or audible tone) which tells the user that this document either isn't recognized or isn't enabled—i.e., that an identifying scan is desired or required. This identifying scan may be used to specifically indicate which document the user has—for example, their local morning newspaper—which then allows the system to refer to a cached copy of the document or related dictionary for determining disambiguation and location of scans.

[0538] The special marks that are scanned might be 1 or 2 dimensional barcodes, or a specific region of human-readable text, or otherwise coded data. In some embodiments, a region of text within the rendered document is specifically marked (for example, by a margin mark, or highlighting, or underlining, or special colored ink) to indicate to the user that this region should be scanned for document recognition.

[0539] All of the above discussion can also be applied to multiple marks within a document. For example, different articles within a magazine or newspaper, individual ads in a magazine, individual pages, etc., might carry special marks, or the user might be asked to explicitly scan one or more items in sub-regions of a document. Thus individual parts of a document can be clearly identified by an explicit action of the user.

[0540] In some cases these scans may be used to help the system know the user's context. In other cases they may enable or unlock features of the system which would not otherwise be available. For example, a purchase from a printed catalog might not be allowed unless the user scans the address label with their identifying code on it.

[0541] In some embodiments, the user may be able to scan a region of text specifically to establish their context—which location in which document. For this purpose the terminal device may have a special switch or input to indicate this desired function (setting context). Alternatively, the user can perform a special gesture with the device that may indicate a context-setting reference scan function, such as by scanning the text in reverse. Alternatively, such a motion or gesture with the device may indicate “erasing” or “undoing” a previous action.

[0542] In general, the motions and actions of the device can be used to indicate user intent. The long list of possible motions includes:

- [0543] Scanning in the direction of reading=generating a document signature.
- [0544] Scanning in the reverse direction=setting a context.
- [0545] Dragging vertically down or up the page (the system can both count horizontal lines traversed, and also capture data fragments from the swath it traverses)=setting a region.
- [0546] Back and forth motions, or up and down motions=undoing a previous action.
- [0547] Circling a region of text=selecting a region
- [0548] Tapping or clicking—either via a switch or sensor in the end of the device which is in contact with the rendered document, or via a separate switch which the user can control=requesting a context relevant menu.

[0549] Note that this is only a partial list. Also note the rich possibilities which result from combining two or more of these motions, and from varying the order in which they are performed.

[0550] One interesting use of the system is in signing documents. Note that the device can record that a particular document was scanned at a particular time, place, etc.—including which portions were scanned. The optics in the device may also be able of capturing and storing an image of a signature. In the system, documents may be provided with special marks or codes at one or more locations (perhaps including a unique identifier code for the entire document). These marks might include specially marked or indicated human readable text (e.g., a section of a legal document which is printed in bold, or underlined, etc.). A user can then scan various portions of a document to indicate that they have read it. In addition, they might optionally sign the document and scan in their signature with the terminal device. The device itself may incorporate writing means as shown in FIG. 6—in which case the user can both scan and sign with one device.

[0551] There has been a long felt need to code documents and sub-parts of documents with special codes—for example barcodes. However, historically, efforts to solve this have not been completely successful. One reason for this may be that a simple barcode scanner in and of itself is not of sufficient utility to the end-user. This gives rise to the chicken-and-egg situation: Users don't carry scanners so publishers don't print codes. Publishers don't print codes, so users don't acquire and use code-scanning devices.

[0552] However, the unique combination of a document navigation tool, plus code scanner (plus, optionally, a tool which performs OCR), can overcome this barrier. Because of the utility and value of the text scanning abilities and/or OCR abilities, users will be motivated to acquire and carry or use a terminal device—which can also include hardware and/or software capable of reading coded (e.g. barcode) information. Note that all the additional components for handling barcodes might be located on a server, or elsewhere in the system. The terminal device might simply capture an image of the barcode to be read and forward this for interpretation.

[0553] In some embodiments, the device recognizes when the image it is scanning is 1-dimensional, as in a barcode. For example, it may check (in software or electronically in hardware, or some combination of these) whether there is one axis which carries no information. A 1-d barcode has this property, being made up of parallel lines assumed to be parallel to the y-axis. In this case, only changes along the x-axis—that cross the lines, perpendicular to them, in the x direction—contain information. In cases where the device sees data which has this 1-dimensional property, it may have local intelligence (hardware and/or software) to reduce this scanned data by collapsing/ignoring the y-axis—i.e., it may be able to partially or completely read or interpret the code (e.g., before communicating with a server).

[0554] This discussion about barcodes raises an interesting technical component of most OCR or systems—“de-skewing”. De-skewing is the process of removing any artificial angular components from scanned or imaged data. A situation which often occurs with hand scanners is that the user holds them at an angle, rotated around the axis perpendicular to the page, so that data captured has an artificial angle or slant included. Note that the angle also may vary over time, for example as the user moves their hand across the page. It is helpful if this artificial skew is removed in one of the steps of processing the data or image.

[0555] When the system employs the template-matching or convolution-based approach (described elsewhere), one advantage is that, to first order, the artificial skew or angle doesn't matter. That is, letters or symbols which are each skewed at the same angle will match each other without removing this skew component.

[0556] Many type fonts carry a number of strong vertical elements. These are often straight lines perpendicular to the base-line. In some embodiments, the system de-skews text by performing a mathematical transform on the data from which the skew angle can be readily determined. This transform can be applied locally so that variations in skew (e.g., across a single line of text) can be detected and measured locally.

[0557] The template-matching (offset-based), convolution approach which can be used in the system has the ability to find matching objects, using earlier occurrences of these objects as templates. One interesting result of this ability is that any repeating objects can carry easily readable information—and the tokens which represent this information do not need to be defined in advance or known to the system.

[0558] As an example, a document contains a string of 1's and 0's (e.g., a representation of binary data), such as: “100101001.”

[0559] In the template matching approach, the system needn't recognize and understand the meaning of a “1” or a “0”. Rather, it can interpret the sample string as, “an object of a first type, followed by two objects of a second type, followed by an object of the first type, . . . etc.” This information in the sample string can just as well be represented by “abbababba” or by “101101010.”

[0560] Data can be encoded using any number of distinct objects or symbols—and that spaces can be treated as one of these objects (if spaces are used, measured distance may be used to count adjacent spaces, or each space object may be limited to always having a count of 1—e.g., such that “1 11 111 1” would be interpreted the same as “1 11 111 1”). From this perspective, a language written in the 26 character roman alphabet (assuming all lower case) is just a special instance of this encoding, where the number of symbols happens to be 26.

[0561] In some embodiments, the system represents the data in a sequence such as the above “011010110” example as offsets—the number of character positions separating recurring instances of each symbol. In this representation, “01101010110” is represented as 3,1,2,2,2,3,1,?,?—where each digit corresponds to a character in the original string, and the value of the digit is the distance or offset to the next occurrence of this same character.

[0562] In this representation, there are certain missing elements and/or forbidden codes. For example, after the first digit, “3”, the digit “2” could never naturally occur—because this would mean that this second character is the same as the first—in which case the “3” would have been a “1”—etc.

[0563] Also, the last two entries (noted as “?”) are redundant—the characters at these positions are known by earlier offsets/references to them—so these two trailing positions carry little or no information. In other words, where a character has an offset of m—assuming we are moving right and measuring offsets to the right—the next character cannot have the offset m−1, and the character after that cannot have the offset m−2, etc. This is because these “forbidden” offsets conflict with and contradict the earlier given offsets.

[0564] In some embodiments, the system exploits the forbidden codes in decoding and/or representing the data. For example, in some embodiments, the facility exploits the forbidden codes by using them to store additional data, such as an exception code. Thus, whenever a sequence of offsets contains the codes “m, m−1”, the system may enter a special mode or routine, perhaps treating following codes specially.

[0565] This effect can be cumulative—that is, each offset must satisfy the constraints of all offsets which have been previously seen. As an example, consider the input input data string “xyzyyxzzzyx,” which has offsets “5,2,4,1,5,5,1,1,?,?,?”. Each of these entries has constraints as follows:

[0566] 5—can be anything, no prior knowledge

[0567] 2—can't be a 4 (else preceding entry would have been 1, not 5)

[0568] 4—can't be a 3 or a 1 (as these would contradict the preceding 5 and 2)

[0569] 1—cant be a 2 (conflicts with 5) or a 3 (conflicts with 4)

[0570] 5—can't be a 2 (conflicts with 4)

[0571] 5—can't be a 4 or a 1 (conflicts with 4 and 5)

[0572] 1—can't be a 4 or a 3 (conflicts with 5 and 5)

[0573] 1—can't be a 3 or a 2 (conflicts with 5 and 5)

[0574] ?—can't be a 2 or a 1 (conflicts with 5 and 5)

[0575] ?—can't be a 1 (conflicts with 5)

[0576] ?—can be anything, since nothing beyond this position is referenced.

[0577] Said another way, any offset which extends beyond one character position imposes logical constraints on all intervening positions.

[0578] One use of this observation is to perform error detection. For example, if a forbidden code is received, the system can interpret this as an error and report or act on it.

[0579] Another use is to encode additional data. In some embodiments, the system interprets forbidden codes as “escape sequences” which invoke special actions or processes, or read subsequent embedded data from the stream—after which the system can re-synchronize to the input stream (since the escape sequence can carry information about the sequence length, or this can be known or inferred by the system) and continue processing.

[0580] Yet another use of these forbidden codes is to reduce the amount of information in the encoding of the data. One algorithm here might be, “if this is the first (smallest) forbidden code, treat it as the first allowed/valid code; if this is the second (next smallest) forbidden code, treat it as the second allowed/valid code”. In this way smaller (forbidden) numbers can represent larger (allowed) codes—so the number of bits used to store or transmit the data is reduced.

[0581] These several example uses of forbidden codes can be combined—for example, the first (smallest) forbidden code might be interpreted as an escape sequence, while higher codes are mapped to the next available valid codes. And other uses of these codes can be applied as well.

[0582] In general, little additional information is carried by sequences which are repeated. Thus, for example, the character sequence “abcabcabcabcabc” is more succinctly represented as “5(abc)”. The same is true for the offset representation of repeating sequences. “abcabcabcabcabc” is represented in offsets as “333333333333???”—which might be represented as “12(3)???”.

[0583] In another example, the sequence “abcbcbcabcbcbcabcbcbc” is first coded as offsets: “72222337222233?2222??”, then reduced to “74(2)2(3)74(2)2(3)?4(2)2(?)”, then further reduced to

[0584] “2(74(2)2(3))?4(2)2(?)”. (The convention shown here is “count(object)” where the parentheses delimit the object, but in a data system this could be represented many ways.)

[0585] In some embodiments, the system drafts repeat counts are altogether, and only the objects themselves are stored or transmitted. Applied to the repeating series of offsets in the earlier example, “abcabcabcabcabc” can first be coded as offsets: “333333333333???” which in turn can be represented as count(object): 12(3)???—which can be stored or transmitted as simply “+3???”—where here the “+” is an indicator that the object repeats. Alternatively, the system just stores or transmits “3”, dropping any reference to a repeat count.

[0586] One reason this issue of repeating sequences is important is that the system may not know how far the user will scan. As an example the user may scan a series of dashes: “----------------------”. If the system assumes that these dashes go on at some length, the user may not wish to scan to their end—so how many dashes are present may not be known. In this case, the system simply stores or transmits “a repeating sequence of length 1” in some embodiments.

[0587] This also works for more complex sequences. Perhaps the sections of a story which a user is reading includes the boundary marker:

[0588] “--***--***--***--***--***--***--***--***--***”

[0589] In some embodiments, the system does not require that this be scanned in its entirety in order to be recognized. The offsets from this sequence could be represented (counting spaces as objects) as: “31641153164115 . . . ” This can be stored or transmitted as a count plus object, or as a “plurality indicator” (“+3164115”—see use of plus sign above), or without any indication of plurality (just “3164115”).

[0590] These latter two examples are roughly akin to matching constructs in regular expressions. The “+3164115” example corresponding to “match greater than 1 occurrence” and the “3164115” example corresponding to “match 1 or more occurrences.” In this last case, the agreed convention, when searching for a sequence in an index or database, would be that any sequence is matched by 1 or more contiguous occurrences of itself.

[0591] Part of the utility of this construct arises when there is a source or reference copy of a document in the system, and the system is attempting to locate the user's position. If the terminal and/or local system components and the back-end components (e.g., archive, indices, etc., perhaps server-based) both understand and agree as to how repeating sequences will be handled, then redundant data can be dropped from storage and communications. In the “1 or more” example from the preceding paragraph, the server which is indexing data might only store a single first instance of a repeating sequence (either of raw data or derived offsets), and a scanning terminal device might only store or transmit 1 instance of the repeating sequence.

[0592] Another way to describe this process is that any repeating sequence is either represented by a count, or, in the simpler alternative model, ignored entirely. Thus the phrase: “*** buy cheap cheap tools here!!!***” could be indexed or represented as: “* buy cheap tools here!*” or its offsets could be similarly compressed: “*** buy cheap cheap tools here!!!***”

[0593] “11*4???6666666?**??6?1???8?2??11??11?” (where offsets greater than 9 are shown as “*”) which compresses to:

[0594] “2(1)*43(?)7(6)?**2(?)6?13(?)8?22(?)2(1)2(?)2(1)?” Or, removing all repeats (but leaving the “*” for offsets higher than 9:

[0595] “1*4?6?**?6?1 ?8?2?1 ?1?”

[0596] A separate system, e.g., running on a remote server, can then search for, or consult an index looking for, sequences which match this compressed representation. To do so it would treat each object in the sequence as potentially occurring “1 or more times”—an, as with regular expressions, would implement code and algorithms to find these matches.

[0597] A similar efficiency in storage and/or transmission can be obtained by noting that, when character offsets are employed, all scans of text end in unknown offsets (shown above as “???”). This is because, assuming the user is scanning left-to-right, and offsets are for the next matching character to the right, at some point the scan must terminate, so some of the last characters will not have known offsets—their next occurrence will not be included in the scan. In one data-encoding technique, these unknowns might be represented as zeros—but another embodiment is to drop these trailing unknowns from the data transmitted or stored.

[0598] Template matching and/or self-correlation use one instance of a token or object or character or symbol as a template to recognize subsequent occurrences of this same object. Here we provide a simplified overview.

[0599] Assume the user is scanning a single horizontal line of text with a terminal device.

[0600] When the user scans a single horizontal line of text with a capture device, in some embodiments the system captures an image of the text and stores it in memory and/or transmits it. In some embodiments, the system performs the template matching on-the-fly, by immediately calculating the offsets of matching objects and storing only the individual templates—and these may be discarded when the offsets are known.

[0601] Initially, the system does not need to know much (if anything) about the shapes of the objects it is scanning. In the process of template matching, these shapes emerge as the various templates discovered.

[0602] This also applies to horizontal extent of characters. While special knowledge about whitespace and the widths of characters can be helpful (e.g., that the ratio of width to height of most characters is about x, or that the average word length is about y, etc.), it isn't essential. Indeed, in some embodiments, the capture device ignores whitespace altogether.

[0603] In some embodiments, as (or after) the user scans a portion of a horizontal line of text, the system “convolves” the line, i.e., effectively slides a copy of the line horizontally past itself, looking for regions which match well. At the start of this process it may be helpful to determine the baseline of the text, and to de-skew it—both are well-known techniques in the field of document imaging. However, note that there are ways to search for matching regions without either of these steps.

[0604] As regions which match or nearly match, their horizontal extent is noted. In this example we are assuming the vertical extent of the match is the entire height of the character (we will later consider some matching techniques, which we call “self-recognition”).

[0605] This process may optionally choose to use connected-region analysis—wherein tokens/objects/characters/symbols are assumed to be comprised of “connected” (i.e., contiguous) pixels or ink. Thus we are in this instance looking for connected regions which match. Note this is related to our knowledge of whitespace, since by definition the region exterior to a connected region of ink is whitespace.

[0606] In some embodiments, the system uses (as another of several approaches) simple horizontal extent. That is, the system pays attention to the horizontal width and position of matching regions of ink or pixels, with no or little attention to connected regions or whitespace—though these components can be introduced to assist the process.

[0607] FIG. 7 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to process text capture actions. In step 701, the system receives text captured by the user. In step 702, the system preprocesses the text scanned in step 701. In step 703, the system identifies word and line boundaries in the scanned text. In step 706, the system convolves the text as described above. In step 705, the system uses delimiters to determine boundaries of unknown regions in the text. In step 706, the system processes the scan to produce a representation of the captured text. In step 707, the system searches for a matching text representation in the corpus of electronic documents. In step 708, if the search of step 707 is successful, then the system continues in step 709 to return a successful search notice, else the system continues in step 710. In step 710, if the search can be refined, then the system continues in step 711, else the system continues in step 712 to return a failed search notice. In step 711, the system indicates to the user that refinement is needed. After step 711, the system continues in step 701 to receive additional text captured by the user in response to the indication of step 711.

[0608] In matching two regions of text taken from rendered documents the system encounters the issue of “goodness of match.” Because all physical measurements include errors, the system's matching process will essentially never be exact. Therefore, in some embodiments, the system makes decisions as to how well one region matches another. Several tools can be used to accomplish this, many already well known in the fields of OCR, document imaging, and machine vision. One way to estimate fit or match used by the system in some embodiments is to first find the best alignment of the objects to be compared, then calculate a difference over the objects. For example, in the case of simple black and white pixels (no gray scale), the system simply finds the pixels which are on in one image/object, and off in the other image/object. The count of these “errors” is a rough estimate of fit.

[0609] This count estimate can be improved by “normalizing it” by (dividing it by) the total number of pixels included. Thus, in various embodiments, the system uses either:

[0610] fit_error=#_bad_pixels/#_pixels_in_x_y_region_compared

[0611] or:

[0612] fit_error=#_bad_pixels/#_pixels_in_object

[0613] The former considers the number of error pixels compared to the area being compared. The latter considers the number of error pixels compared to the number or matching, non-error pixels. In various embodiments, the system adds various refinements to these techniques, or uses other matching techniques from OCR, etc.

[0614] In the described matching process, the physical distribution (e.g., x-y coordinates) of the error and matching pixels is of potential importance. In abbreviated and approximate language, there may be a better fit when the matching pixels are “concentrated” (i.e., contiguous, occurring close together), and the error pixels are “distributed” (i.e., non-contiguous, occurring far apart).

[0615] As an example of this, consider two situations. In one case, the system compares the image of an “r” to that of an “n”. Only a small part of the image contains error pixels—where the right hand side of the “n” descends to the base line, but the “r” does not. Note that there may not be a large number of error pixels, but they occur close together and contiguous. Next, consider comparing two images of the letter “n”, where the quality of the image is not good—e.g., it has been blurred or smeared, or is fuzzy. In this case, there may be very many error pixels—but note that they are likely to occur distributed at many places around the character. This demonstrates that widely distributed error pixels suggest less error than closely packed error pixels.

[0616] This discussion about matching leads to another related innovation called “self-matching”. Historically, OCR has employed direct knowledge about absolute character shapes and fonts to recognize various characters. In some embodiments, the system uses indirect knowledge about *relative* character shape to recognize characters.

[0617] FIGS. 8A-8D illustrate how two characters of an alphabet often have approximately the same *relative* shape in multiple fonts. FIG. 8A shows the letters “D”, “C”, and “L” in an Arial lower-case font, while FIG. 8C shows these letters in a Times New Roman lower-case font. Even though the fonts are very different and distinct, the relationship between these characters *within* a particular font are approximately the same.

[0618] FIGS. 8B and 8D show that, in either font, a “d” can be constructed with some accuracy by adding together a “c” and an “l”. Or, in a pseudo-algebraic statement, “d=c+l”. There are many other similar relationships that are true for many fonts, such as “e=c+−”, “P=B−b+l”, “8=6+9. These relationships are not meant to be exact—but, rather, that the relative shapes of various letters in different fonts is *approximately* the same. Even though these relationships are approximate, they allow us to use one group of characters in a font to recognize (or, indeed, construct) additional characters.

[0619] One application of this technique is in OCR. Once the system determines a few of the characters in a font—perhaps one about which we have no knowledge—the system may then be able to predict and/or recognize the remaining, unknown characters.

[0620] It is often possible to establish the identity of some characters using simple techniques of cryptography, such as character frequency and n-gram analyses. Observations about how frequently a character appears, in which positions within words, in association with what other characters, can provide initial information about characters—even though they appear in a font about which we have no knowledge. The simplest example might be the single characters “a” and “l”—when we see one character words, we know immediately they are probably one of these two letters. Similarly, characters which are repeated (e.g., ee, oo) are not likely to be “hh” or “qq”.

[0621] Assume that the system has learned the characters “d” and “o”, and encounters the character “c”—but doesn't yet know what it is. By comparing the character “C′”s shape with the shapes of characters that have been learned, the system determines that it matches the “d” except for the vertical stem; and that it matches the “o” except for the right hand edge. Knowing that these are the relative characteristics of ““d”, “o”, and “c” in most fonts, the system has now identified the new letter “c”. Having done so, the system adds it to its repertoire of known symbols, and uses it in deciphering additional characters. Thus, the system's knowledge about a font about which it has no specific knowledge can be grown incrementally and extended, based on its *general* knowledge of *relative* character shapes.

[0622] One way to implement this self-recognition system is as an m×m matrix of general relationships, where m is the number of characters in the alphabet. Each entry in this table describes how character i relates to character j—possibly including general relative shape information and rules (“character i extends below the baseline, character j doesn't”)—and possibly including reference to additional characters in the alphabet (e.g., the entry for row “d” and column “c” might be “−l”—subtract an “l” to make a “c” from a “d”—and the entry for row “c” and column “d” might be “+l”—add an “l” to make a “d” from a “c”).

[0623] A special case of self-recognition occurs when a set of symbols or tokens (i.e., a new font) is constructed with explicit intent that they be self-recognizable as described above. That is, given a subset of these symbols, the others can be derived or inferred. These symbols can be used to error-check each other, since their graphic components/design are interrelated. This redundancy also provides also robustness against noise.

[0624] To employ such an approach, there is no requirement that *any* of the symbols be known to the system in advance. By using one of the above-described approaches of template-matching or correlation, the system can determine the entire symbol set being used based upon the matching and non-matching symbols. The system then uses known relationship between symbols to confirm each of the symbols, or in some cases to generate any missing/unused symbols—even though the system has never seen this symbol set before.

[0625] FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates the approach used by the facility in some embodiments to learn an entirely new set of symbols using self recognition. The diagram shows a set 900 of symbols comprised of a 2×2 array of small “boxes”. Using knowledge of whitespace and a baseline to establish vertical and horizontal spacing, there are 16 possible symbols: 4 single boxes in the four corners, 6 permutations involving 2 boxes, 4 permutations each having 3 boxes, and one symbol having all 4 boxes, and a whitespace symbol comprised of no boxes.

[0626] FIG. 10 is a diagram that shows a subset of the symbols shown in FIG. 9 that self-define their vertical and horizontal extent. Each symbol of the subset 1000 is two boxes wide and two boxes high.

[0627] FIG. 11 is a diagram that shows relationships between some of the symbols shown in FIG. 9. For example, each of relationships 1101 and 1102 show a relationship by which one symbol of the set can be constructed out of two other symbols. Note that we can choose as a subset those symbols which have the best redundancy and/or error correction properties. Note that some symbols can be constructed at least two different ways from combinations of symbols in the set.

[0628] ***************

[0629] Several dedicated bar code scanning devices aimed at the consumer market have achieved commercial failure, perhaps because barcode scanning alone does not offer enough value or function for broad consumer adoption. On the other hand, the combination of document marking/scanning and barcode scanning creates a combined function which will be of use and interest to a wide array of consumers. This combination of text and barcode imaging can be accomplished with many of the same components, hardware and software. However, one really interesting new ingredient is a scanning device which makes use of a reference or source copy of the rendered document being scanned, which enables the user's actions in the rendered document are interpreted with respect to, and mapped to, the source or reference document.

[0630] Another means for locating the source document is if the marked version carries a machine-readable code which identifies the document and/or provides directions for retrieving this source document (e.g., a URL). This code might be a barcode, machine-readable font, or any machine-readable means for conveying this information.

[0631] An interesting extension of the machine-readable document ID and document locator is for this data to include access information. That is, included in the machine readable code is information which allows the system to access the document, e.g., when it is password protected, behind a corporate firewall, etc. Note that an additional input might be required by the user or another individual which confirms the request to access this document.

[0632] In some embodiments, the system maintains the relationship between a user's notes and marks and the document content and features associated with these notes and marks. This can be important, for example, if the source document is re-rendered in a different style or format, and the system wants to re-display the user's mark at the correct location. As an example, if the user draws a line through a word of text, the system may want to show that line through the same text in subsequent renderings.

[0633] One means to accomplish this is to “anchor” each user mark or group of marks with some recognizable feature in the document (e.g., a single word, punctuation mark, image, etc.). In some embodiments, the system does so by finding the nearest source-document feature (e.g., by geometric distance) and associate the mark with this feature.

[0634] In some embodiments, the system finds near-by features, and to weight or rank them, and then associate the user's marks with a high-rated feature. As an example, if the system encounters a margin note by the user, it might examine all near-by words, and associate the mark with the word which is most relevant (e.g., a keyword rather than a stop-word, perhaps related to the topic of the source document text, etc.). This aspect of the system can employ some of the many techniques which are known for identifying important elements in a document.

[0635] Notes and marks which have associated anchor points can thus be related to digital documents—such that the relevant note or mark can be accessed when viewing or editing the document (e.g., with a word processor). For example, all such notes might appear as a special symbol embedded in the document (and optionally stored within the document). The user might then mouse-over or click on these symbols to reveal the embedded or associated note or mark. Similarly, the user's notes might be turned on or off via a menu command.

CONCLUSION

[0636] It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the above-described system may be straightforwardly adapted or extended in various ways. While the foregoing description makes reference to particular embodiments, the scope of the invention is defined solely by the claims that following and the elements recited therein.

Claims

We claim:

1. A method in a computing system for navigating an electronic document, comprising:

electronically capturing a portion of a rendered document, the portion including a text fragment within the rendered document;

in response to the capture, identifying (1) an electronic document contained in a corpus of electronic documents, the identified electronic document containing the captured document portion, and (2) a position within the identified electronic document at which the selected document portion occurs;

accessing a markup layer that relates to the identified electronic document and determines custom actions to be made available in response to captures from particular positions in the identified electronic document;

identifying actions associated with the identified position in the identified electronic document, wherein at least one of the identified actions was associated with the identified position in the identified electronic document before an occurrence of an electronic capture of the portion of the rendered document; and

making the identified actions available to a user who captured the portion of the rendered document.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the identified electronic document and the identified position are identified without determining a standard-character-set representation of the selected document portion.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the identification is performed using a convolution-encoded representation of text contained by the selected document portion.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

encoding two selected document portions each into a convolution-encoded representation, the two selected document portions containing text of two different natural languages.

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

encoding data that is independent of textual content of the selected document portion in the convolution-encoded representation, wherein encoding data comprises including an invalid value in the convolution-encoded representation.

6. The method of claim 2 wherein the selected document portion is unique among the corpus of electronic documents, and a version of the selected document portion from which a single word is deleted is not unique among the corpus of electronic documents.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein electronically capturing a portion of a rendered document includes optically capturing an image of the portion of the rendered document.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein electronically capturing a portion of a rendered document includes capturing a user speaking the text fragment within the portion of the rendered document.

9. A computer-readable storage medium whose contents cause a mobile phone to perform a method for navigating an electronic document, the method comprising:

electronically capturing a portion of a rendered document, the portion constituting a text fragment within the rendered document, wherein electronically capturing the portion of the rendered document includes optically capturing an image of the portion using a camera of a mobile phone or capturing a spoken version of the text fragment within the rendered document using a microphone of the mobile phone;

in response to the capture of the portion of the rendered document, identifying (1) an electronic document contained in a corpus of electronic documents, the identified electronic document containing the captured document portion, and (2) a position within the identified electronic document at which the selected document portion occurs;

accessing a markup layer for the identified electronic document that associates actions to be performed to particular positions in the identified electronic document;

identifying actions using the accessed markup layer associated with the identified position in the identified electronic document, wherein at least one of the identified actions was associated with the identified position in the identified electronic document before an occurrence of an electronic capture of the portion of the rendered document; and

presenting, via a display associated with the mobile phone, one or more user-selecable options to perform the identified actions associated with the identified position in the identified electronic document.

10. The computer-readable medium of claim 9, wherein accessing the markup layer includes accessing a data structure that maps the actions to be performed with text within the identified positions in the identified rendered document.

11. The computer-readable medium of claim 9, wherein the identified actions include global actions associated with every particular portion of the rendered document.

12. A system for navigating an electronic document, the system comprising:

means for optically capturing a text based portion of a rendered document;

means for recognizing the text within the optically captured text based portion of the rendered document;

means for identifying (1) an electronic document contained in a corpus of electronic documents, the identified electronic document containing the text based portion, and (2) a position within the identified electronic document at which the optical capture occurs;

means for accessing a markup layer that relates to the identified electronic document and determines custom actions to be made available in response to captures from particular positions in the identified electronic document

means for identifying two or more actions associated with the identified position in the identified electronic document, wherein the identified two or more actions includes an action associated with the identified position in the identified electronic document before an occurrence of an optical capture of the text based portion of the rendered document; and

means for displaying user-selectable options associated with the identified two or more actions.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the identified two or more actions includes an action dynamically generated after an occurrence of an optical capture of the text based portion of the rendered document.

Patent Citations (664)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US4052058(A)	1977-10-01	Hintz	Applicant
US4526078(A)	1985-07-01	Chadabe	Applicant
US4538072(A)	1985-08-01	Immler et al.	Applicant
US4610025(A)	1986-09-01	Blum et al.	Applicant
US4636848(A)	1987-01-01	Yamamoto et al.	Applicant
US4713008(A)	1987-12-01	Stocker et al.	Applicant
US4716804(A)	1988-01-01	Chadabe	Applicant
US4748678(A)	1988-05-01	Takeda et al.	Applicant
US4776464(A)	1988-10-01	Miller et al.	Applicant
US4804949(A)	1989-02-01	Faulkerson	Applicant
US4805099(A)	1989-02-01	Huber	Applicant
US4829453(A)	1989-05-01	Katsuta et al.	Applicant
US4829872(A)	1989-05-01	Topic et al.	Applicant
US4890230(A)	1989-12-01	Tanoshima et al.	Applicant
USD306162(S)	1990-02-01	Faulkerson et al.	Applicant
US4901364(A)	1990-02-01	Faulkerson et al.	Applicant
US4941125(A)	1990-07-01	Boyne	Applicant
US4947261(A)	1990-08-01	Ishikawa et al.	Applicant
US4949391(A)	1990-08-01	Faulkerson et al.	Applicant
US4968877(A)	1990-11-01	McAvinney et al.	Applicant
US4985863(A)	1991-01-01	Fujisawa et al.	Applicant
US4988981(A)	1991-01-01	Zimmerman et al.	Applicant
US5010500(A)	1991-04-01	Makkuni et al.	Applicant
US5012349(A)	1991-04-01	de Fay	Applicant
US5062143(A)	1991-10-01	Schmitt	Applicant
US5083218(A)	1992-01-01	Takasu et al.	Applicant
US5093873(A)	1992-03-01	Takahashi et al.	Applicant
US5109439(A)	1992-04-01	Froessl	Applicant
US5119081(A)	1992-06-01	Ikehira et al.	Applicant
US5133024(A)	1992-07-01	Froessl et al.	Applicant
US5133052(A)	1992-07-01	Bier et al.	Applicant
US5136687(A)	1992-08-01	Edelman et al.	Applicant
US5146404(A)	1992-09-01	Calloway et al.	Applicant
US5146552(A)	1992-09-01	Cassorla et al.	Applicant
US5157384(A)	1992-10-01	Greanias et al.	Applicant
US5168565(A)	1992-12-01	Morita et al.	Applicant
US5179652(A)	1993-01-01	Rozmanith et al.	Applicant
US5185857(A)	1993-02-01	Rozmanith et al.	Applicant
US5202985(A)	1993-04-01	Goyal	Applicant
US5203704(A)	1993-04-01	McCloud	Applicant
US5229590(A)	1993-07-01	Harden et al.	Applicant
US5231698(A)	1993-07-01	Forcier	Applicant
US5243149(A)	1993-09-01	Comerford et al.	Applicant
US5247285(A)	1993-09-01	Yokota et al.	Applicant
US5251106(A)	1993-10-01	Hui	Applicant
US5251316(A)	1993-10-01	Anick et al.	Applicant
US5252951(A)	1993-10-01	Tannenbaum et al.	Applicant
USRE34476(E)	1993-12-01	Norwood	Applicant
US5288938(A)	1994-02-01	Wheaton	Applicant
US5301243(A)	1994-04-01	Olschafskie et al.	Applicant
US5347295(A)	1994-09-01	Agulnick et al.	Applicant
US5347306(A)	1994-09-01	Nitta	Applicant
US5347477(A)	1994-09-01	Lee	Applicant
US5355146(A)	1994-10-01	Chiu et al.	Applicant
US5360971(A)	1994-11-01	Kaufman et al.	Applicant
US5367453(A)	1994-11-01	Capps et al.	Applicant
US5377706(A)	1995-01-01	Huang	Applicant
US5398310(A)	1995-03-01	Tchao et al.	Applicant
US5404442(A)	1995-04-01	Foster et al.	Applicant
US5404458(A)	1995-04-01	Zetts	Applicant
US5418684(A)	1995-05-01	Koenck et al.	Applicant
US5418717(A)	1995-05-01	Su et al.	Applicant
US5418951(A)	1995-05-01	Damashek	Applicant
US5423554(A)	1995-06-01	Davis	Applicant
US5430558(A)	1995-07-01	Sohaei et al.	Applicant
US5438630(A)	1995-08-01	Chen et al.	Applicant
US5452442(A)	1995-09-01	Kephart	Applicant
US5454043(A)	1995-09-01	Freeman	Applicant
US5462473(A)	1995-10-01	Sheller	Applicant
US5465325(A)	1995-11-01	Capps et al.	Applicant
US5467425(A)	1995-11-01	Lau et al.	Applicant
US5481278(A)	1996-01-01	Shigematsu et al.	Applicant
US5485565(A)	1996-01-01	Saund et al.	Applicant
US5488196(A)	1996-01-01	Zimmerman et al.	Applicant
US5499108(A)	1996-03-01	Cotte et al.	Applicant
US5500937(A)	1996-03-01	Thompson-Rohrlich	Applicant
US5502803(A)	1996-03-01	Yoshida et al.	Applicant
US5512707(A)	1996-04-01	Ohshima	Applicant
US5517578(A)	1996-05-01	Altman et al.	Applicant
US5533141(A)	1996-07-01	Futatsugi et al.	Applicant
US5539427(A)	1996-07-01	Bricklin et al.	Applicant
US5543591(A)	1996-08-01	Gillespie et al.	Applicant
US5550930(A)	1996-08-01	Berman et al.	Applicant
US5555363(A)	1996-09-01	Tou et al.	Applicant
US5563996(A)	1996-10-01	Tchao	Applicant
US5568452(A)	1996-10-01	Kronenberg	Applicant
US5570113(A)	1996-10-01	Zetts	Applicant
US5574804(A)	1996-11-01	Olschafskie et al.	Applicant
US5581276(A)	1996-12-01	Cipolla et al.	Applicant
US5581670(A)	1996-12-01	Bier et al.	Applicant
US5581681(A)	1996-12-01	Tchao et al.	Applicant
US5583542(A)	1996-12-01	Capps et al.	Applicant
US5583543(A)	1996-12-01	Takahashi et al.	Applicant
US5583980(A)	1996-12-01	Anderson	Applicant
US5590219(A)	1996-12-01	Gourdol	Applicant
US5590256(A)	1996-12-01	Tchao et al.	Applicant
US5592566(A)	1997-01-01	Pagallo et al.	Applicant
US5594469(A)	1997-01-01	Freeman et al.	Applicant
US5594640(A)	1997-01-01	Capps et al.	Applicant
US5594810(A)	1997-01-01	Gourdol	Applicant
US5595445(A)	1997-01-01	Bobry	Applicant
US5596697(A)	1997-01-01	Foster et al.	Applicant
US5600765(A)	1997-02-01	Ando et al.	Applicant
US5602570(A)	1997-02-01	Capps et al.	Applicant
US5608778(A)	1997-03-01	Partridge, III	Applicant
US5612719(A)	1997-03-01	Beernink et al.	Applicant
US5625833(A)	1997-04-01	Levine et al.	Applicant
US5627960(A)	1997-05-01	Clifford et al.	Applicant
US5638092(A)	1997-06-01	Eng et al.	Applicant
US5649060(A)	1997-07-01	Ellozy et al.	Applicant
US5652849(A)	1997-07-01	Conway et al.	Applicant
US5656804(A)	1997-08-01	Barkan et al.	Applicant
US5659638(A)	1997-08-01	Bengtson	Applicant
US5663514(A)	1997-09-01	Usa	Applicant
US5663808(A)	1997-09-01	Park et al.	Applicant
US5668573(A)	1997-09-01	Favot et al.	Applicant
US5677710(A)	1997-10-01	Thompson-Rohrlich	Applicant
US5682439(A)	1997-10-01	Beernink et al.	Applicant
US5684873(A)	1997-11-01	Tiilikainen	Applicant
US5687254(A)	1997-11-01	Poon et al.	Examiner
US5692073(A)	1997-11-01	Cass	Examiner
US5699441(A)	1997-12-01	Sagawa et al.	Applicant
US5701424(A)	1997-12-01	Atkinson	Applicant
US5701497(A)	1997-12-01	Yamauchi et al.	Applicant
US5710831(A)	1998-01-01	Beernink et al.	Applicant
US5713045(A)	1998-01-01	Berdahl	Applicant
US5714698(A)	1998-02-01	Tokioka et al.	Applicant
US5717846(A)	1998-02-01	Iida et al.	Applicant
US5724985(A)	1998-03-01	Snell et al.	Applicant
US5732214(A)	1998-03-01	Subrahmanyam	Applicant
US5732227(A)	1998-03-01	Kuzunuki et al.	Applicant
US5734923(A)	1998-03-01	Sagawa et al.	Applicant
US5737507(A)	1998-04-01	Smith	Applicant
US5745116(A)	1998-04-01	Pisutha-Arnond	Applicant
US5748926(A)	1998-05-01	Fukuda et al.	Applicant
US5752051(A)	1998-05-01	Cohen	Applicant
US5754308(A)	1998-05-01	Lopresti et al.	Applicant
US5754939(A)	1998-05-01	Herz et al.	Applicant
US5764794(A)	1998-06-01	Perlin	Applicant
US5767457(A)	1998-06-01	Gerpheide et al.	Applicant
US5768418(A)	1998-06-01	Berman et al.	Applicant
US5768607(A)	1998-06-01	Drews et al.	Applicant
US5774357(A)	1998-06-01	Hoffberg et al.	Applicant
US5774591(A)	1998-06-01	Black et al.	Applicant
US5777614(A)	1998-07-01	Ando et al.	Applicant
US5781662(A)	1998-07-01	Mori et al.	Applicant
US5781723(A)	1998-07-01	Yee et al.	Applicant
US5784061(A)	1998-07-01	Moran et al.	Applicant
US5784504(A)	1998-07-01	Anderson et al.	Applicant
US5796866(A)	1998-08-01	Sakurai et al.	Applicant
US5798693(A)	1998-08-01	Engellenner	Applicant
US5798758(A)	1998-08-01	Harada et al.	Applicant
US5799219(A)	1998-08-01	Moghadam et al.	Applicant
US5805167(A)	1998-09-01	Van Cruyningen	Applicant
US5809172(A)	1998-09-01	Melen	Applicant
US5809267(A)	1998-09-01	Moran et al.	Applicant
US5809476(A)	1998-09-01	Ryan	Applicant
US5821925(A)	1998-10-01	Carey et al.	Applicant
US5822539(A)	1998-10-01	Van Hoff	Applicant
US5825943(A)	1998-10-01	DeVito et al.	Applicant
US5832474(A)	1998-11-01	Lopresti et al.	Applicant
US5837987(A)	1998-11-01	Koenck et al.	Applicant
US5838326(A)	1998-11-01	Card et al.	Applicant
US5838889(A)	1998-11-01	Booker	Applicant
US5845301(A)	1998-12-01	Rivette et al.	Applicant
US5848187(A)	1998-12-01	Bricklin et al.	Applicant
US5852676(A)	1998-12-01	Lazar	Applicant
US5861886(A)	1999-01-01	Moran et al.	Applicant
US5862256(A)	1999-01-01	Zetts et al.	Applicant
US5862260(A)	1999-01-01	Rhoads	Applicant
US5864635(A)	1999-01-01	Zetts et al.	Applicant
US5864848(A)	1999-01-01	Horvitz et al.	Applicant
US5867150(A)	1999-02-01	Bricklin et al.	Applicant
US5867597(A)	1999-02-01	Peairs et al.	Applicant
US5867795(A)	1999-02-01	Novis et al.	Applicant
US5880411(A)	1999-03-01	Gillespie et al.	Applicant
US5880731(A)	1999-03-01	Liles et al.	Applicant
US5880743(A)	1999-03-01	Moran et al.	Applicant
US5884267(A)	1999-03-01	Goldenthal et al.	Applicant
US5889236(A)	1999-03-01	Gillespie et al.	Applicant
US5889523(A)	1999-03-01	Wilcox et al.	Applicant
US5893126(A)	1999-04-01	Drews et al.	Applicant
US5893130(A)	1999-04-01	Inoue et al.	Applicant
US5895470(A)	1999-04-01	Pirolli et al.	Applicant
US5905251(A)	1999-05-01	Knowles	Applicant
US5907328(A)	1999-05-01	Brush II et al.	Applicant
US5917491(A)	1999-06-01	Bauersfeld	Applicant
US5920477(A)	1999-07-01	Hoffberg et al.	Applicant
US5920694(A)	1999-07-01	Carleton et al.	Applicant
US5932863(A)	1999-08-01	Rathus et al.	Applicant
US5933829(A)	1999-08-01	Durst et al.	Applicant
US5946406(A)	1999-08-01	Frink et al.	Applicant
US5952599(A)	1999-09-01	Dolby et al.	Applicant
US5953541(A)	1999-09-01	King et al.	Applicant
US5956423(A)	1999-09-01	Frink et al.	Applicant
US5960383(A)	1999-09-01	Fleischer	Applicant
US5966126(A)	1999-10-01	Szabo	Applicant
US5970455(A)	1999-10-01	Wilcox et al.	Applicant
US5982853(A)	1999-11-01	Liebermann	Applicant
US5982929(A)	1999-11-01	Ilan et al.	Applicant
US5986200(A)	1999-11-01	Curtin	Applicant
US5986655(A)	1999-11-01	Chiu et al.	Applicant
US5990878(A)	1999-11-01	Ikeda et al.	Applicant
US5990893(A)	1999-11-01	Numazaki	Applicant
US5991441(A)	1999-11-01	Jourjine	Applicant
US5995643(A)	1999-11-01	Saito	Applicant
US5999664(A)	1999-12-01	Mahoney et al.	Examiner
US6002798(A)	1999-12-01	Palmer et al.	Applicant
US6002808(A)	1999-12-01	Freeman	Applicant
US6003775(A)	1999-12-01	Ackley	Applicant
US6011905(A)	2000-01-01	Huttenlocher et al.	Applicant
US6012071(A)	2000-01-01	Krishna et al.	Applicant
US6018342(A)	2000-01-01	Bristor	Applicant
US6018346(A)	2000-01-01	Moran et al.	Applicant
US6021218(A)	2000-02-01	Capps et al.	Applicant
US6021403(A)	2000-02-01	Horvitz et al.	Applicant
US6025844(A)	2000-02-01	Parsons	Applicant
US6026388(A)	2000-02-01	Liddy et al.	Applicant
US6028271(A)	2000-02-01	Gillespie et al.	Applicant
US6029195(A)	2000-02-01	Herz	Applicant
US6031525(A)	2000-02-01	Perlin	Applicant
US6038342(A)	2000-03-01	Bernzott et al.	Applicant
US6040840(A)	2000-03-01	Koshiba et al.	Applicant
US6042012(A)	2000-03-01	Olmstead et al.	Applicant
US6049034(A)	2000-04-01	Cook	Applicant
US6049327(A)	2000-04-01	Walker et al.	Applicant
US6052481(A)	2000-04-01	Grajski et al.	Applicant
US6055513(A)	2000-04-01	Katz et al.	Applicant
US6057844(A)	2000-05-01	Strauss	Applicant
US6057845(A)	2000-05-01	Dupouy	Applicant
US6061050(A)	2000-05-01	Allport et al.	Applicant
US6064854(A)	2000-05-01	Peters et al.	Applicant
US6066794(A)	2000-05-01	Longo	Applicant
US6069622(A)	2000-05-01	Kurlander	Applicant
US6072494(A)	2000-06-01	Nguyen	Applicant
US6072502(A)	2000-06-01	Gupta	Applicant
US6075895(A)	2000-06-01	Qiao et al.	Applicant
US6078308(A)	2000-06-01	Rosenberg et al.	Applicant
US6081629(A)	2000-06-01	Browning	Applicant
US6085162(A)	2000-07-01	Cherny	Applicant
US6088484(A)	2000-07-01	Mead	Applicant
US6088731(A)	2000-07-01	Kiraly et al.	Applicant
US6092038(A)	2000-07-01	Kanevsky et al.	Applicant
US6092068(A)	2000-07-01	Dinkelacker	Applicant
US6097392(A)	2000-08-01	Leyerle	Applicant
US6098106(A)	2000-08-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6104401(A)	2000-08-01	Parsons	Applicant
US6104845(A)	2000-08-01	Lipman et al.	Applicant
US6107994(A)	2000-08-01	Harada et al.	Applicant
US6108656(A)	2000-08-01	Durst et al.	Applicant
US6111580(A)	2000-08-01	Kazama et al.	Applicant
US6111588(A)	2000-08-01	Newell	Applicant
US6115053(A)	2000-09-01	Perlin	Applicant
US6115482(A)	2000-09-01	Sears et al.	Applicant
US6115724(A)	2000-09-01	Booker	Applicant
US6118888(A)	2000-09-01	Chino et al.	Applicant
US6118899(A)	2000-09-01	Bloomfield et al.	Applicant
USD432539(S)	2000-10-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6128003(A)	2000-10-01	Smith et al.	Applicant
US6138915(A)	2000-10-01	Danielson et al.	Applicant
US6144366(A)	2000-11-01	Numazaki et al.	Applicant
US6147678(A)	2000-11-01	Kumar et al.	Applicant
US6151208(A)	2000-11-01	Bartlett	Applicant
US6154222(A)	2000-11-01	Haratsch et al.	Applicant
US6154723(A)	2000-11-01	Cox et al.	Applicant
US6154758(A)	2000-11-01	Chiang	Applicant
US6157935(A)	2000-12-01	Tran et al.	Applicant
US6164534(A)	2000-12-01	Rathus et al.	Applicant
US6167369(A)	2000-12-01	Schulze	Applicant
US6169969(B1)	2001-01-01	Cohen	Applicant
US6175772(B1)	2001-01-01	Kamiya et al.	Applicant
US6175922(B1)	2001-01-01	Wang	Applicant
US6181343(B1)	2001-01-01	Lyons	Applicant
US6181778(B1)	2001-01-01	Ohki et al.	Applicant
US6184847(B1)	2001-02-01	Fateh et al.	Applicant
US6192165(B1)	2001-02-01	Irons	Applicant
US6192478(B1)	2001-02-01	Elledge	Applicant
US6195104(B1)	2001-02-01	Lyons	Applicant
US6195475(B1)	2001-02-01	Beausoleil, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US6199048(B1)	2001-03-01	Hudetz et al.	Applicant
US6204852(B1)	2001-03-01	Kumar et al.	Applicant
US6208355(B1)	2001-03-01	Schuster	Applicant
US6208435(B1)	2001-03-01	Zwolinski	Applicant
US6215890(B1)	2001-04-01	Matsuo et al.	Applicant
US6218964(B1)	2001-04-01	Ellis	Applicant
US6219057(B1)	2001-04-01	Carey et al.	Applicant
US6222465(B1)	2001-04-01	Kumar et al.	Applicant
US6229542(B1)	2001-05-01	Miller	Applicant
US6233591(B1)	2001-05-01	Sherman et al.	Applicant
US6240207(B1)	2001-05-01	Shinozuka et al.	Applicant
US6243683(B1)	2001-06-01	Peters	Applicant
US6244873(B1)	2001-06-01	Hill et al.	Applicant
US6249292(B1)	2001-06-01	Christian et al.	Applicant
US6249606(B1)	2001-06-01	Kiraly et al.	Applicant
US6252598(B1)	2001-06-01	Segen	Applicant
US6256400(B1)	2001-07-01	Takata et al.	Applicant
US6269187(B1)	2001-07-01	Frink et al.	Applicant
US6269188(B1)	2001-07-01	Jamali	Applicant
US6270013(B1)	2001-08-01	Lipman et al.	Applicant
US6285794(B1)	2001-09-01	Georgiev et al.	Applicant
US6289304(B1)	2001-09-01	Grefenstette et al.	Applicant
US6304674(B1)	2001-10-01	Cass et al.	Applicant
US6307952(B1)	2001-10-01	Dietz	Applicant
US6307955(B1)	2001-10-01	Zank et al.	Applicant
US6310971(B1)	2001-10-01	Shiiyama et al.	Applicant
US6311152(B1)	2001-10-01	Bai et al.	Applicant
US6312175(B1)	2001-11-01	Lum	Applicant
US6313853(B1)	2001-11-01	Lamontagne et al.	Applicant
US6314457(B1)	2001-11-01	Schena et al.	Applicant
US6316710(B1)	2001-11-01	Lindemann	Applicant
US6317132(B1)	2001-11-01	Perlin	Applicant
US6318087(B1)	2001-11-01	Baumann et al.	Applicant
US6321991(B1)	2001-11-01	Knowles	Applicant
US6323846(B1)	2001-11-01	Westerman et al.	Applicant
US6326962(B1)	2001-12-01	Szabo	Applicant
US6335725(B1)	2002-01-01	Koh et al.	Applicant
US6341280(B1)	2002-01-01	Glass et al.	Applicant
US6344906(B1)	2002-02-01	Gatto et al.	Applicant
US6346933(B1)	2002-02-01	Lin	Applicant
US6347290(B1)	2002-02-01	Bartlett	Applicant
US6351222(B1)	2002-02-01	Swan et al.	Applicant
US6356281(B1)	2002-03-01	Isenman	Applicant
US6356899(B1)	2002-03-01	Chakrabarti et al.	Applicant
US6363160(B1)	2002-03-01	Bradski et al.	Applicant
USRE37654(E)	2002-04-01	Longo	Applicant
US6366288(B1)	2002-04-01	Naruki et al.	Applicant
US6369811(B1)	2002-04-01	Graham et al.	Applicant
US6377296(B1)	2002-04-01	Zlatsin et al.	Applicant
US6377712(B1)	2002-04-01	Georgiev et al.	Applicant
US6377986(B1)	2002-04-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6378075(B1)	2002-04-01	Goldstein et al.	Applicant
US6380931(B1)	2002-04-01	Gillespie et al.	Applicant
US6381602(B1)	2002-04-01	Shoroff et al.	Applicant
US6384744(B1)	2002-05-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6384829(B1)	2002-05-01	Prevost et al.	Applicant
US6393443(B1)	2002-05-01	Rubin et al.	Applicant
US6396523(B1)	2002-05-01	Segal et al.	Applicant
US6396951(B1)	2002-05-01	Grefenstette et al.	Applicant
US6400845(B1)	2002-06-01	Volino	Applicant
US6404438(B1)	2002-06-01	Hatlelid et al.	Applicant
US6408257(B1)	2002-06-01	Harrington et al.	Applicant
US6414671(B1)	2002-07-01	Gillespie et al.	Applicant
US6417797(B1)	2002-07-01	Cousins et al.	Applicant
US6418433(B1)	2002-07-01	Chakrabarti et al.	Applicant
US6421453(B1)	2002-07-01	Kanevsky et al.	Applicant
US6421675(B1)	2002-07-01	Ryan et al.	Applicant
US6430554(B1)	2002-08-01	Rothschild	Applicant
US6430567(B2)	2002-08-01	Burridge	Applicant
US6433784(B1)	2002-08-01	Merrick et al.	Applicant
US6434561(B1)	2002-08-01	Durst, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US6434581(B1)	2002-08-01	Forcier	Applicant
US6438523(B1)	2002-08-01	Oberteuffer et al.	Applicant
US6448979(B1)	2002-09-01	Schena et al.	Applicant
US6449616(B1)	2002-09-01	Walker et al.	Applicant
US6454626(B1)	2002-09-01	An	Applicant
US6460036(B1)	2002-10-01	Herz	Applicant
US6466198(B1)	2002-10-01	Feinstein	Applicant
US6476830(B1)	2002-11-01	Farmer et al.	Applicant
US6476834(B1)	2002-11-01	Doval et al.	Applicant
US6477239(B1)	2002-11-01	Ohki et al.	Applicant
US6483513(B1)	2002-11-01	Haratsch et al.	Applicant
US6484156(B1)	2002-11-01	Gupta et al.	Applicant
US6486874(B1)	2002-11-01	Muthuswamy et al.	Applicant
US6486892(B1)	2002-11-01	Stern	Applicant
US6489970(B1)	2002-12-01	Pazel	Applicant
US6491217(B2)	2002-12-01	Catan	Applicant
US6498970(B2)	2002-12-01	Colmenarez et al.	Applicant
US6504138(B1)	2003-01-01	Mangerson	Applicant
US6507349(B1)	2003-01-01	Balassanian	Applicant
US6508706(B2)	2003-01-01	Sitrick et al.	Applicant
US6509707(B2)	2003-01-01	Yamashita et al.	Applicant
US6509912(B1)	2003-01-01	Moran et al.	Applicant
US6510387(B2)	2003-01-01	Fuchs et al.	Applicant
US6510417(B1)	2003-01-01	Quilici et al.	Applicant
US6518950(B1)	2003-02-01	Dougherty et al.	Applicant
US6522333(B1)	2003-02-01	Hatlelid et al.	Applicant
US6525749(B1)	2003-02-01	Moran et al.	Applicant
US6526395(B1)	2003-02-01	Morris	Applicant
US6526449(B1)	2003-02-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6532007(B1)	2003-03-01	Matsuda	Applicant
US6538187(B2)	2003-03-01	Beigi	Applicant
US6539931(B2)	2003-04-01	Trajkovic et al.	Applicant
US6540141(B1)	2003-04-01	Dougherty et al.	Applicant
US6542933(B1)	2003-04-01	Durst, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US6543052(B1)	2003-04-01	Ogasawara	Applicant
US6545669(B1)	2003-04-01	Kinawi et al.	Applicant
US6546385(B1)	2003-04-01	Mao et al.	Applicant
US6546405(B2)	2003-04-01	Gupta et al.	Applicant
US6549751(B1)	2003-04-01	Mandri	Applicant
US6549891(B1)	2003-04-01	Rauber et al.	Applicant
US6554433(B1)	2003-04-01	Holler	Applicant
US6560281(B1)	2003-05-01	Black et al.	Applicant
US6564144(B1)	2003-05-01	Cherveny	Applicant
US6570555(B1)	2003-05-01	Prevost et al.	Applicant
US6571193(B1)	2003-05-01	Unuma et al.	Applicant
US6571235(B1)	2003-05-01	Marpe et al.	Applicant
US6573883(B1)	2003-06-01	Bartlett	Applicant
US6577329(B1)	2003-06-01	Flickner et al.	Applicant
US6577953(B1)	2003-06-01	Swope et al.	Applicant
US6587835(B1)	2003-07-01	Treyz et al.	Applicant
US6593723(B1)	2003-07-01	Johnson	Applicant
US6594616(B2)	2003-07-01	Zhang et al.	Applicant
US6594705(B1)	2003-07-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6597443(B2)	2003-07-01	Boman	Applicant
US6599130(B2)	2003-07-01	Moehrle	Applicant
US6600475(B2)	2003-07-01	Gutta et al.	Applicant
US6610936(B2)	2003-08-01	Gillespie et al.	Applicant
US6615136(B1)	2003-09-01	Swope et al.	Applicant
US6615268(B1)	2003-09-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6617369(B2)	2003-09-01	Parfondry et al.	Applicant
US6618504(B1)	2003-09-01	Yoshino et al.	Applicant
US6618732(B1)	2003-09-01	White et al.	Applicant
US6622165(B1)	2003-09-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6624833(B1)	2003-09-01	Kumar et al.	Applicant
US6625335(B1)	2003-09-01	Kanai	Applicant
US6625581(B1)	2003-09-01	Perkowski	Applicant
US6628295(B2)	2003-09-01	Wilensky	Applicant
US6629133(B1)	2003-09-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6630924(B1)	2003-10-01	Peck	Applicant
US6631404(B1)	2003-10-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6636763(B1)	2003-10-01	Junker et al.	Applicant
US6636892(B1)	2003-10-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6636896(B1)	2003-10-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6638314(B1)	2003-10-01	Meyerzon et al.	Applicant
US6638317(B2)	2003-10-01	Nakao et al.	Applicant
US6643692(B1)	2003-11-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6650761(B1)	2003-11-01	Rodriguez et al.	Applicant
US6651053(B1)	2003-11-01	Rothschild	Applicant
US6658151(B2)	2003-12-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US6661919(B2)	2003-12-01	Nicholson et al.	Applicant
US6664991(B1)	2003-12-01	Chew et al.	Applicant
US6669088(B2)	2003-12-01	Veeneman	Applicant
US6671684(B1)	2003-12-01	Hull et al.	Examiner
US6677969(B1)	2004-01-01	Hongo	Applicant
US6678664(B1)	2004-01-01	Ganesan	Applicant
US6681031(B2)	2004-01-01	Cohen et al.	Applicant
US6686844(B2)	2004-02-01	Watanabe et al.	Applicant
US6687612(B2)	2004-02-01	Cherveny	Applicant
US6688081(B2)	2004-02-01	Boyd	Applicant
US6688522(B1)	2004-02-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6688523(B1)	2004-02-01	Koenck	Applicant
US6688525(B1)	2004-02-01	Nelson et al.	Applicant
US6690358(B2)	2004-02-01	Kaplan	Applicant
US6691123(B1)	2004-02-01	Gulliksen	Applicant
US6691151(B1)	2004-02-01	Cheyer et al.	Applicant
US6691194(B1)	2004-02-01	Ofer	Applicant
US6691914(B2)	2004-02-01	Isherwood et al.	Applicant
US6692259(B2)	2004-02-01	Kumar et al.	Applicant
US6694356(B1)	2004-02-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6697838(B1)	2004-02-01	Jakobson	Applicant
US6697949(B1)	2004-02-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
USH2098(H)	2004-03-01	Morin	Applicant
US6701354(B1)	2004-03-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6701369(B1)	2004-03-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6704024(B2)	2004-03-01	Robotham et al.	Applicant
US6704699(B2)	2004-03-01	Nir et al.	Applicant
US6707581(B1)	2004-03-01	Browning	Applicant
US6708208(B1)	2004-03-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6714969(B1)	2004-03-01	Klein et al.	Applicant
US6718308(B1)	2004-04-01	Nolting	Applicant
US6720984(B1)	2004-04-01	Jorgensen et al.	Applicant
US6721921(B1)	2004-04-01	Altman	Applicant
US6725125(B2)	2004-04-01	Basson et al.	Applicant
US6725203(B1)	2004-04-01	Seet et al.	Applicant
US6725260(B1)	2004-04-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6728000(B1)	2004-04-01	Lapstun et al.	Applicant
US6735632(B1)	2004-05-01	Kiraly et al.	Applicant
US6741745(B2)	2004-05-01	Dance et al.	Applicant
US6744938(B1)	2004-06-01	Rantze et al.	Applicant
US6745234(B1)	2004-06-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6747632(B2)	2004-06-01	Howard	Applicant
US6750852(B2)	2004-06-01	Gillespie et al.	Applicant
US6752498(B2)	2004-06-01	Covannon et al.	Applicant
US6753883(B2)	2004-06-01	Schena et al.	Applicant
US6754632(B1)	2004-06-01	Kalinowski et al.	Applicant
US6754698(B1)	2004-06-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6757715(B1)	2004-06-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6758398(B1)	2004-07-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6760661(B2)	2004-07-01	Klein et al.	Applicant
US6766494(B1)	2004-07-01	Price et al.	Applicant
US6766956(B1)	2004-07-01	Boylan, III et al.	Applicant
US6772047(B2)	2004-08-01	Butikofer	Applicant
US6772338(B1)	2004-08-01	Hull	Applicant
US6773177(B2)	2004-08-01	Denoue et al.	Applicant
US6778988(B2)	2004-08-01	Bengtson	Applicant
US6786793(B1)	2004-09-01	Wang	Applicant
US6788809(B1)	2004-09-01	Grzeszczuk et al.	Applicant
US6788815(B2)	2004-09-01	Lui et al.	Applicant
US6791536(B2)	2004-09-01	Keely et al.	Applicant
US6791588(B1)	2004-09-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6792112(B1)	2004-09-01	Campbell et al.	Applicant
US6792452(B1)	2004-09-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US6798429(B2)	2004-09-01	Bradski	Applicant
US6801637(B2)	2004-10-01	Voronka et al.	Applicant
US6804396(B2)	2004-10-01	Higaki et al.	Applicant
US6804659(B1)	2004-10-01	Graham et al.	Applicant
US6813039(B1)	2004-11-01	Silverbrook et al.	Applicant
US6816894(B1)	2004-11-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6822639(B1)	2004-11-01	Silverbrook et al.	Applicant
US6823388(B1)	2004-11-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6824044(B1)	2004-11-01	Lapstun et al.	Applicant
US6824057(B2)	2004-11-01	Rathus et al.	Applicant
US6825956(B2)	2004-11-01	Silverbrook et al.	Applicant
US6826592(B1)	2004-11-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6827259(B2)	2004-12-01	Rathus et al.	Applicant
US6827267(B2)	2004-12-01	Rathus et al.	Applicant
US6829650(B1)	2004-12-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6830187(B2)	2004-12-01	Rathus et al.	Applicant
US6830188(B2)	2004-12-01	Rathus et al.	Applicant
US6832116(B1)	2004-12-01	Tillgren et al.	Applicant
US6833936(B1)	2004-12-01	Seymour	Applicant
US6834804(B2)	2004-12-01	Rathus et al.	Applicant
US6836799(B1)	2004-12-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US6868193(B1)	2005-03-01	Gharbia et al.	Applicant
US6879957(B1)	2005-04-01	Pechter et al.	Applicant
US6880122(B1)	2005-04-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US6886104(B1)	2005-04-01	McClurg et al.	Applicant
US6898592(B2)	2005-05-01	Peltonen et al.	Applicant
US6931592(B1)	2005-08-01	Ramaley et al.	Applicant
US6938024(B1)	2005-08-01	Horvitz	Applicant
US6947571(B1)	2005-09-01	Rhoads et al.	Applicant
US6947930(B2)	2005-09-01	Anick et al.	Applicant
US6970915(B1)	2005-11-01	Partovi et al.	Applicant
US6993580(B2)	2006-01-01	Isherwood et al.	Applicant
US7016084(B2)	2006-03-01	Tsai	Applicant
US7043489(B1)	2006-05-01	Kelley	Applicant
US7051943(B2)	2006-05-01	Leone et al.	Applicant
US7057607(B2)	2006-06-01	Mayoraz et al.	Applicant
US7062706(B2)	2006-06-01	Maxwell et al.	Applicant
US7069240(B2)	2006-06-01	Spero et al.	Applicant
US7079713(B2)	2006-07-01	Simmons	Applicant
US7096218(B2)	2006-08-01	Schirmer et al.	Applicant
US7103848(B2)	2006-09-01	Barsness et al.	Applicant
US7110576(B2)	2006-09-01	Norris, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US7121469(B2)	2006-10-01	Dorai et al.	Applicant
US7124093(B1)	2006-10-01	Graham et al.	Applicant
US7130885(B2)	2006-10-01	Chandra et al.	Applicant
US7136814(B1)	2006-11-01	McConnell	Applicant
US7151864(B2)	2006-12-01	Henry et al.	Applicant
US7174054(B2)	2007-02-01	Manber et al.	Applicant
US7224820(B2)	2007-05-01	Inomata et al.	Applicant
US7240843(B2)	2007-07-01	Paul et al.	Applicant
US7246118(B2)	2007-07-01	Chastain et al.	Applicant
US7263521(B2)	2007-08-01	Carpentier et al.	Applicant
US7275049(B2)	2007-09-01	Clausner et al.	Applicant
US7299186(B2)	2007-11-01	Kuzunuki et al.	Applicant
US7299969(B2)	2007-11-01	Paul et al.	Applicant
US2001/0001854(A1)	2001-05-01	Schena et al.	Applicant
US2001/0003176(A1)	2001-06-01	Schena et al.	Applicant
US2001/0003177(A1)	2001-06-01	Schena et al.	Applicant
US2001/0032252(A1)	2001-10-01	Durst et al.	Applicant
US2001/0049636(A1)	2001-12-01	Hudda et al.	Applicant
US2001/0053252(A1)	2001-12-01	Creque	Applicant
US2001/0056463(A1)	2001-12-01	Grady et al.	Applicant
US2002/0002504(A1)	2002-01-01	Engel et al.	Applicant
US2002/0013781(A1)	2002-01-01	Petersen	Applicant
US2002/0016750(A1)	2002-02-01	Attia	Applicant
US2002/0020750(A1)	2002-02-01	Dymetman et al.	Applicant
US2002/0023158(A1)	2002-02-01	Polizzi et al.	Applicant
US2002/0023215(A1)	2002-02-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2002/0023959(A1)	2002-02-01	Miller et al.	Applicant
US2002/0029350(A1)	2002-03-01	Cooper et al.	Applicant
US2002/0038456(A1)	2002-03-01	Hansen et al.	Applicant
US2002/0051262(A1)	2002-05-01	Nuttall et al.	Applicant
US2002/0052747(A1)	2002-05-01	Sarukkai	Applicant
US2002/0055906(A1)	2002-05-01	Katz et al.	Applicant
US2002/0075298(A1)	2002-06-01	Schena et al.	Applicant
US2002/0076110(A1)	2002-06-01	Zee	Applicant
US2002/0090132(A1)	2002-07-01	Boncyk et al.	Applicant
US2002/0091569(A1)	2002-07-01	Kitaura et al.	Applicant
US2002/0099812(A1)	2002-07-01	Davis et al.	Applicant
US2002/0102966(A1)	2002-08-01	Lev et al.	Applicant
US2002/0133725(A1)	2002-09-01	Roy et al.	Applicant
US2002/0135815(A1)	2002-09-01	Finn	Applicant
US2002/0161658(A1)	2002-10-01	Sussman	Applicant
US2002/0194143(A1)	2002-12-01	Banerjee et al.	Applicant
US2003/0001018(A1)	2003-01-01	Hussey et al.	Applicant
US2003/0004724(A1)	2003-01-01	Kahn et al.	Applicant
US2003/0009495(A1)	2003-01-01	Adjaoute	Applicant
US2003/0028889(A1)	2003-02-01	McCoskey et al.	Applicant
US2003/0040957(A1)	2003-02-01	Rodriguez et al.	Applicant
US2003/0046307(A1)	2003-03-01	Rivette et al.	Applicant
US2003/0050854(A1)	2003-03-01	Showghi et al.	Applicant
US2003/0065770(A1)	2003-04-01	Davis et al.	Applicant
US2003/0093384(A1)	2003-05-01	Durst et al.	Applicant
US2003/0098352(A1)	2003-05-01	Schnee et al.	Applicant
US2003/0106018(A1)	2003-06-01	Silverbrook et al.	Applicant
US2003/0130904(A1)	2003-07-01	Katz et al.	Applicant
US2003/0132298(A1)	2003-07-01	Swartz et al.	Applicant
US2003/0144865(A1)	2003-07-01	Lin et al.	Applicant
US2003/0150907(A1)	2003-08-01	Metcalf et al.	Applicant
US2003/0179908(A1)	2003-09-01	Mahoney et al.	Examiner
US2003/0187886(A1)	2003-10-01	Hull et al.	Examiner
US2003/0200152(A1)	2003-10-01	Divekar	Applicant
US2003/0214528(A1)	2003-11-01	Pierce et al.	Applicant
US2003/0218070(A1)	2003-11-01	Tsikos et al.	Applicant
US2004/0015606(A1)	2004-01-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US2004/0036718(A1)	2004-02-01	Warren et al.	Applicant
US2004/0042667(A1)	2004-03-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US2004/0044576(A1)	2004-03-01	Kurihara et al.	Applicant
US2004/0044952(A1)	2004-03-01	Jiang et al.	Applicant
US2004/0052400(A1)	2004-03-01	Inomata et al.	Applicant
US2004/0059779(A1)	2004-03-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US2004/0064453(A1)	2004-04-01	Ruiz et al.	Applicant
US2004/0073708(A1)	2004-04-01	Warnock	Applicant
US2004/0073874(A1)	2004-04-01	Poibeau et al.	Applicant
US2004/0075686(A1)	2004-04-01	Watler et al.	Applicant
US2004/0078749(A1)	2004-04-01	Hull et al.	Applicant
US2004/0121815(A1)	2004-06-01	Fournier et al.	Applicant
US2004/0122811(A1)	2004-06-01	Page	Applicant
US2004/0128514(A1)	2004-07-01	Rhoads	Applicant
US2004/0158492(A1)	2004-08-01	Lopez et al.	Applicant
US2004/0186859(A1)	2004-09-01	Butcher	Applicant
US2004/0199615(A1)	2004-10-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US2004/0206809(A1)	2004-10-01	Wood et al.	Applicant
US2004/0208369(A1)	2004-10-01	Nakayama	Applicant
US2004/0208372(A1)	2004-10-01	Boncyk et al.	Applicant
US2004/0210943(A1)	2004-10-01	Philyaw	Applicant
US2004/0217160(A1)	2004-11-01	Silverbrook et al.	Applicant
US2004/0220975(A1)	2004-11-01	Carpentier et al.	Applicant
US2004/0229194(A1)	2004-11-01	Yang	Applicant
US2004/0230837(A1)	2004-11-01	Philyaw et al.	Applicant
US2004/0243601(A1)	2004-12-01	Toshima	Applicant
US2004/0254795(A1)	2004-12-01	Fujii et al.	Examiner
US2004/0256454(A1)	2004-12-01	Kocher	Applicant
US2004/0258275(A1)	2004-12-01	Rhoads	Applicant
US2004/0260470(A1)	2004-12-01	Rast	Applicant
US2004/0260618(A1)	2004-12-01	Larson	Applicant
US2004/0267734(A1)	2004-12-01	Toshima	Applicant
US2004/0268237(A1)	2004-12-01	Jones et al.	Examiner
US2005/0005168(A1)	2005-01-01	Dick	Applicant
US2005/0076095(A1)	2005-04-01	Mathew et al.	Applicant
US2005/0086309(A1)	2005-04-01	Galli et al.	Applicant
US2005/0144074(A1)	2005-06-01	Fredregill et al.	Applicant
US2005/0149516(A1)	2005-07-01	Wolf et al.	Applicant
US2005/0149538(A1)	2005-07-01	Singh et al.	Applicant
US2005/0228683(A1)	2005-10-01	Saylor et al.	Applicant
US2005/0278179(A1)	2005-12-01	Overend et al.	Applicant
US2006/0069616(A1)	2006-03-01	Bau	Applicant
US2006/0080314(A1)	2006-04-01	Hubert et al.	Applicant
US2006/0126131(A1)	2006-06-01	Tseng et al.	Applicant
US2006/0229940(A1)	2006-10-01	Grossman	Applicant
US2007/0005570(A1)	2007-01-01	Hurst-Hiller et al.	Applicant
US2007/0061146(A1)	2007-03-01	Jaramillo et al.	Applicant
US2007/0099636(A1)	2007-05-01	Roth	Applicant
US2007/0170248(A1)	2007-07-01	Brundage et al.	Applicant
US2007/0208561(A1)	2007-09-01	Choi et al.	Applicant
US2007/0208732(A1)	2007-09-01	Flowers et al.	Applicant
US2007/0249406(A1)	2007-10-01	Andreasson	Applicant
US2008/0071775(A1)	2008-03-01	Gross	Examiner
EP424803	1991-05-01		Applicant
EP544434	1993-06-01		Applicant
EP596247	1994-05-01		Applicant
EP1141882	2001-10-01		Applicant
EP1398711	2004-03-01		Applicant
JP3260768	1991-11-01		Applicant
JP10-133847	1998-05-01		Applicant
JP2003216631	2003-07-01		Applicant
WO/67091	2000-11-01		Applicant
WO-02/11446(A2)	2002-02-01		Applicant
WO-02/091233(A2)	2002-11-01		Applicant
WO-2004/084109	2004-09-01		Applicant
WO2005/071665(A1)	2005-08-01		Applicant
WO-2008/002074	2008-01-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (152)

U.S. Appl. No. 10/676,881, filed Sep. 30, 2003, Lee et al.Applicant
U.S. Appl. No. 60/201,570, Bengston.Applicant
Agilent Technologies. “Agilent ADNK-2133 Optical Mouse Designer's Kit: Product Overview.” 2004, 6 pp.Applicant
Airclic. “Products.” http://www.airclic.com/products.asp, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 3pp.Applicant
Arai, Toshifumi , Dietmar Aust, Scott E. Hudson. “Paperlink: A Technique for Hyperlinking From Real Paper to Electronic Content.” Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 97), Addison-Wesley, Apr. 1997, pp. 327-334.Applicant
Aust, Dietmar. “Augmenting Paper Documents with Digital Information in a Mobile Environment” MS Thesis, University of Dortmund, Department of Computer Graphics, 1996. 47pp.Applicant
Bai, Zhen-Long, and Qiang Huo “An Approach to Extracting the Target Text Line from a Document Image Captured by a Pen Scanner.” Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 2003), 2003, 5 pp.Applicant
Bell, Timothy, Ian H. Witten, John G. Cleary, “Modeling for Text Compression.” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 21, No. 4. Dec. 1989. pp. 557-591.Applicant
Bentley, Jon L. and Robert Sedgewick. “Fast Algorithms for Sorting and Searching Strings,” Proceedings of the 10th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1997, pp. 360-369.Applicant
C Technologies AB. “CPEN User's Guide.” Jan. 2001, 130pp.Applicant
C Technologies AB. “User's Guide for C-Pen 10.” Aug. 2001, 128pp.Applicant
Capobianco, Robert A. “Design Considerations for: Optical Coupling of Flashlamps and Fiber Optics.” PerkinElmer, 1998-2003. http://optoelectronics.perkinelmer.com/content/whitepapers/OpticatCoupling.pdf, 12 pp.Applicant
Casio Computer Co. Ltd, ALPS Electric Co., Ltd. “Alliance Agreement on Development and Mass Production of Fingerprint Scanner for Mobile Devices.” Press Release, Feb. 25, 2003. http://world.casio.com/pacific/news/2003/fingerprint.html, 2pp.Applicant
Cenker, Christian. “Waveiet Packets and Optimization in Pattern Recognition.” Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop of the AAPR, Hallstatt, Austria, May 1997, 11pp.Applicant
Clancy, Heather. “Cell Phones Get New Job: Portable Scanning.” C/Net News.com, http://news.com.com/2102-1039—5572897.htm?tag=st.util.print, Accessed Feb. 13, 2005, 3pp.Applicant
Cybertracker. Homepage. http://www.cybertracker.co.za/, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 2pp.Applicant
Digital Convergence. “CueCat.” http://www.cuecat.com, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 2 pp.Applicant
Docuport “DocuPen Operating Manual.” Montreal, Quebec, 2004, 48pp.Applicant
Doermann, David, Huiping Li, Omid Kia, Kemal Kilic. “The Detection of Duplicates in Document Image Databases.” Technical Report. LAMP-TR-005/CAR-TR-850/CS-TR-3739, University of Maryland College Park, Feb. 1997, 39pp.Applicant
Report. LAMP-TR-0013/CAR-TR-878/CS-TR-3876. University of Maryland College Park, Feb. 1998, 39 pp.Applicant
Doermann, David, J. Sauvola, H. Kauniskangas, C. Shin, M. Pietikäinen & A. Rosenfeld. “The Development of a General Framework for Intelligent Document Image Retrieval.” Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 29: Document Analysis Systems II. Washington DC: World Scientific Press, 1997, 28 pp.Applicant
Duong, Jean, Myriam Cöté, Hubert Emptoz, Ching Y. Suen. “Extraction of Text Areas in Printed Document Images.” Proceedings of the 2001 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. New York, NY: ACM Press, 2001, pp. 157-164.Applicant
Erol, Bema, Jonathan J. Hull, and Dar-Shyang Lee. “Linking Multimedia Presentations with their Symbolic Source Documents: Algorithm and Applications.” ACM Multimedia: New York, NY: ACM Press, 2003, 10pp.Applicant
Fall, C.J., A Törcsvári, K. Benzineb, G. Karetka. “Automated Categorization in the International Patent Classification.” ACM SIGIR Forum. vol. 37, Issue 1, Spring 2003: 10-25.Applicant
Ficstar. Homepage. www.ficstar.com, accessed Oct. 4, 2005, 1p.Applicant
Fitzgibbon, Andrew, and Ehud Reiter. “Memories for Life: Managing Information Over a Human Lifetime.” UK Computing Research Committee's Grand Challenges in Computing Workshop, May 22, 2003. 8pp.Applicant
Ghani, Rayid, Rosie Jones, and Dunja Mladenić. “Mining the Web to Create Minority Language Corpora.” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM). Atlanta, Georgia, Nov. 5-10, 2001, pp279-286.Applicant
Google. “Google Search Appliance—Intranets.” http://www.google.com/appliance/pdf/ds—GSA—intranets.pdf, 2004, 2 pp.Applicant
Google. “Simplicity and Enterprise Search.”. 2003 http://www.google.com/enterprise/pdf/google—simplicity—enterprise—wp.pdf, 7pp.Applicant
Graham, Jamey, Berna Erol, Jonathan J. Hull, and Dar-Shyang Lee. “The Video Paper Multimedia Playback System.” Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia. New York, NY: ACM Press, 2003, pp. 94-95.Applicant
Grossman, David A, Ophir Frieder, Nazli Goharian “Token Identification” Slideshow. 2002, 15 pp.Applicant
Guimbretiére, François. “Paper Augmented Digital Documents.” Proceedings of Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. New York, NY: ACM Press, 2003, 10pp.Applicant
Hansen, Jesse. “A Matlab Project in Optical Character Recognition (OCR).” DSP Lab, University of Rhode Island. May 15 2002, 6pp.Applicant
Heiner,Jeremy M. , Scott E. Hudson, Kenichiro Tanaka. “Linking and Messaging from Real Paper in the Paper PDA.” ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1999, pp. 179-186.Applicant
Hewlett-Packard Company. “HP Capshare 920 Portable E-Copier and Information Appliance User Guide, First Edition,” 1999, 42 pp.Applicant
Hjaltason, Gisli R. And Hanan Samet. “Distance Browsing in Spatial Databases.” ACM Transactions on Database Systems. vol. 24, No. 2, Jun. 1999: 265-318.Applicant
Hong, Tao and Jonathan H. Hull. “Degraded Text Recognition Using Word Collocation and Visual Inter-Word Constraints.” Fourth ACL Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Stuttgart, Germany, 1994, 2pp.Applicant
Hopkins, George W., and Tad D. Simons. “A Semi-Imaging Light Pipe for Collecting Weakly Scattered Light.” Hewlett Packard Company, Jun. 1998, 6 pp. 2000, 21 pp.Applicant
Hull, Jonathan J, and Dar-Shyang Lee. “Simultaneous Highlighting of Paper and Electronic Documents.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR '00), vol. 4. Barcelona, 2000, 4401-4404.Applicant
Hull, Jonathan J, Dar-Shyang Lee, John Cullen, Peter E. Hart. “Document Analysis Techniques for the Infinite Memory Multifunction Machine.” DEXA Workshop, 1999. http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/-ley/db/conf/dexaw/dexaw99.html, 5pp.Applicant
Inglis, Stuart and Ian H. Witten. “Compression-Based Template Matching.” University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, 1994, 10 pp.Applicant
IPValue Management, Xerox Research Centre Europe. “Technology Licensing Opportunity: Xerox Mobile Camera Document Imaging.” Slideshow, Mar. 1, 2004, 11pp.Applicant
ISRI Staff. “OCR Accuracy Produced by the Current DOE Document Conversion System.” Technical Report Jun. 2002, Information Science Research Institute at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. May 2002, 9pp.Applicant
Jainschigg, John and Richard “Zippy” Grigonis, “M-Commerce Alternatives,” Communications Convergence.com, http://www.cconvergence.com/shared/article/showArticle.jhtml?articleid=8701069, May 7, 2001, 14pp.Applicant
Janesick, James. “Dueling Detectors.” Spie's OE Magazine. Feb. 2002: 30-33.Applicant
Jenny, Reinhard. “Fundamentals of Fiber Optics: An Introduction for Beginners.” Technical Report for Volpi AG, Apr. 26, 2000. http://www.volpiusa.com/whitepapers/FundamentalsofFiberOptics.pdf, 23pp.Applicant
Kahan, José and Marja-Riitta Koivunen. “Annotea: An Open RDF Infrastructure for Shared Web Annotations.” Proceedings of the 10th International World Wide Web Conference, Hong Kong, 2001. http://www10.org/cdrom/papers/frame.html, pp. 623-632.Applicant
Kasabach, Chris, Chris Pacione, John Stivoric, Francine Gemperle, Dan Siewiorek. “Digital Ink: A Familiar Idea with Technological Might!” CHI 1998 Conference. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1998, pp.175-176.Applicant
Keytronic. “F-SCAN-S001US Stand Alone Fingerprint Scanner.” http://www.keytronic.com/home/shop/Productlist.asp?CATID=62&SubCATID=1, accessed Oct. 4, 2005, 2pp.Applicant
Khoubyari, Siamak. “The Application of Word Image Matching in Text Recognition.” MS Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, Jun. 1992, 107pp.Applicant
Kia, Omid and David Doerman. “Integrated Segmentation and Clustering for Enhanced Compression of Document Images.” International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Ulm Germany Aug. 18-20, 1997 vol. 1. 6 pp.Applicant
Kia, Omid E. “Document Image Compression and Analysis.” PhD Thesis, University of Maryland at College Park, 1997, 141pp.Applicant
Kia, Omid, David Doerman, Azriel Rosenfeld, Rama Chellappa. “Symbolic Compression and Processing of Document Images.” Technical Report: LAMP-TR-004/CFAR-TR-849/CS-TR-3734, University of Maryland, College Park, Jan. 1997, 36pp.Applicant
Kia, Omid. “Integrated Segmentation and Clustering for Enhanced Compression of Document Images.” International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Ulm, Germany, Aug. 18-20, 1997, 7pp.Applicant
Kopec, Gary E. “Multilevel Character Templates for Document Image Decoding.” IS&T/SPIE 1997 International Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science & Technology , San Jose, CA, Feb 8-14, 1997, 10pp.Applicant
Kopec, Gary E., Maya R. Said, Kris Popat. “N-Gram Language Models for Document Image Decoding.” Proceedings of IS&T/SPIE Electronics Imaging 2002: Document Recognition and Retrievel IX, vol. 4670-20, Jan. 2002. 12pp.Applicant
Kukich, Karen. “Techniques for Automatically Correcting Words in Text.” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 24, No. 4, Dec. 1992: pp. 377-439.Applicant
Lee, Bongsoo, Won Y. Choi, James K. Walker. “Ultrahigh-Resolution Plastic Graded-index fused Image Plates.” Optics Letters, vol. 24, No. 10, May 15, 2000: 719-721.Applicant
Lee, D.L, and F.H. Lochovsky. “Voice Response Systems.” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 15, Issue 4, Dec. 1983: pp. 351-374.Applicant
Lee, Dar-Shyang and Jonathan J. Hull. “Detecting Duplicates Among Symbolically Compressed Images in a Large Document Database.” Pattern Recognition Letters, No. 22, 2001: 545-550.Applicant
Lee, Dar-Shyang and Jonathan J. Hull. “Duplicate Detection for Symbolically Compressed Documents.” Fifth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 1999, 4pp.Applicant
Lee, Dar-Shyang. “Substitution Deciphering Based on HMMs with Applications to Compressed Document Processing.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, No. 12.. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society, Dec. 2002, pp. 1661-1666.Applicant
Lesher, G.W., Moulton, B.J. & Higginbotham, D.J. (1999) “Effects of Ngram Order and Training Text Size on Word Prediction.” Proceedings of the RESNA '99 Annual Conference, 1999, 3pp.Applicant
Lieberman, Henry. “Out of Many, One: Reliable Results from Unreliable Recognition.” ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2002); Apr. 20-25, 2000; Minneapolis; MN; 2 pp.Applicant
Lightsource Picture.Applicant
Liu, Lon-Mu, Yair M. Babad, Wei Sun, and Ki-Kan Chan. “Adaptive Post-Processing of OCR Text Via Knowledge Acquisition.” Proceedings of the ACM 1991 Computer Science Conference, New York, NY: ACM Press, 1991, pp. 558-569.Applicant
Ljungstrand, Peter, Johan Redström, and Lars Erik Holmquist “Webstickers: Using Physical Tokens to Access, Manage, and Share Bookmarks to the Web.” Proceedings of Designing Augmented Reality Environments 2000, Elsinore, Denmark, Apr. 12-14, 2000, pp. 23-31.Applicant
LTI Computer Vision Library “LTI Image Processing Library Developer's Guide. Version Oct. 29, 2003.” Aachen, Germany, 2002, 45 pp.Applicant
Manolescu, Dragos-Anton. “Feature Extraction—A Pattern for Information Retrieval” Proceedings of the 5th Pattern Languages of Proctramming, Monticello, Illinois, Aug. 1998, 18 pp.Applicant
McNamee, Paul, James Mayfield, Christine Piatko. “Haircut: A System for Multilingual Text Retrieval in Java.” Journal of Computing Sciences in Small Colleges, vol. 17, Issue 2, Feb. 2002: 8-22.Applicant
Mind Like Water. “Collection Creator.” www.collectioncreator.com, accessed Oct. 2, 2005, 3pp.Applicant
Muddu, Prashant. “A Study of Image Transmission Through a Fiber-Optic Conduit and its Enhancement Using Digital Image Processing Techniques.” Thesis, Florida State College of Engineering, Nov. 18, 2003, 93 pp.Applicant
Munich, Mario E, and Pietro Perona. “Visual Input for Pen-Based Computers.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR '96) vol. III. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE CS Press. Jun. 1996, 5pp.Applicant
Murdoch, Gregary and Nicholas Kushmerick. “Mapping Physical Artifacts to their Web Counterparts: A Case Study with Products Catalogs.” MHCI-2004 Workshop on Mobile and Ubiquitous Information Access (Strathclyde, UK). 2004, 7pp.Applicant
Nabeshima, Shinji, Shinichirou Yamamoto, Kiyoshi Agusa, Toshio Taguchi. “MEMO-PEN: A New Input Device.” CHI '95 Proceedings Short Papers. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1995, pp. 256-257.Applicant
Nautilus Hyosung. “New Software for Automated Teller Machines.” http://www.nautilus.hyosung.com/product—service/software—software05.html, accessed Oct. 4, 2005, 3pp.Applicant
NEOMEDIA Technologies “Paperclick for Cellphones.” Brochure. 2004 2pp.Applicant
NEOMEDIA Technologies “Paperclick Linking Services.” Brochure. 2004, 1 page.Applicant
NEOMEDIA Technologies. “For Wireless Communication Providers.” Brochure. 2004, 1 page.Applicant
Neville, Sean. “Project Atom, Amazon, Mobile Web Services, and Fireflies at Rest” Artima Weblogs, http://www.artimA.com/weblogs/viewpostIsp?thread=18731, Oct. 24, 2003, 4pp.Applicant
Newman, William and Pierre Wellner. “A Desk Supporting Computer-based Interaction with Paper Documents.” Proceedings of ACM CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1992, pp. 587-592.Applicant
Pal, U. S. Sinha, and B.B. Chaudhuri. “Multi-Oriented Text Lines Detection and Their Skew Estimation.” Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, Ahmedabad, India, Dec. 16-18, 2002, 6pp.Applicant
Peacocks MD&B. “Peacocks MD&B, Releases Latest hands and Eyes Free Voice Recognition Barcode Scanner.” http://www.peacocks.com.au/store/page.pl?id=457, Dec. 5, 2004, 2pp.Applicant
Peterson, James L. “Detecting and Correcting Spelling Errors.” Communications of the ACM, vol. 23 No. 12, Dec. 1980, pp. 676-687.Applicant
Planon Systems Solutions. “Docupen 700.” http://www.docupen.com, accesssed Oct. 3, 2005.Applicant
Podio, Fernando L. “Biometrics—Technologies For Highly Secure Personal Authentication,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, http://whitepapers.zdnet.corn/search.aspx?compid=3968, May 2001, 8pp.Applicant
Precise Biometrics. “Precise 200 MC.” http://www.precisebiometrics.com/data/content/DOCUMENTS/200592691619553200%20MC.pdf. accessed Oct. 4, 2005, 2pp.Applicant
Price, Morgan N, Gene Golovchinsky, Bill N. Schilit. “Linking by Inking: Trailblazing in a Paper-like Hypertext.” Proceedings of Hypertext '98. Pittsburgh, PA: ACM Press, 1998, 10 pp.Applicant
Psion Teklogix. “WORKABOUT PRO.” http://www.psionteklogix.com/public.aspx?s=uk&p=Products&pCat=128&pID=1058, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 2pp.Applicant
Rao, Ramana, Stuart K. Card, Walter Johnson, Leigh Klotz, and Randall H. Trigg. “Protofoil: Storing and Finding the Information Worker's Paper Documents in an Electronic File Cabinet.” Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1994, pp. 180-185, 477.Applicant
Roberts, David A. and Richard R.A. Syms. “1D and 2D Laser Line Scan Generation Using a Fibre Optic Resonant Scanner.” Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, 2003, 11pp.Applicant
Rus, Daniela, and Devika Subramanian. “Multi-media RISSC Informatics: Retrieving Information with Simple Structural Components.” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, NY: 1993, pp. 263-294.Applicant
Samet, Hanan. “Data Structures for Quadtree Approximation and Compression.” Communications of the ACM, vol. 28, No. 9, Sep. 1985: pp. 973-993.Applicant
Schilit, Bill N. Gene Golovchinsky, Morgan N. Price. “Beyond Paper: Supporting Reading with Free Form Digital Ink Annotations.” Proceedings of CHI 98, Active New York, NY: ACM Press, 1998, 8pp.Applicant
Schott North America, “Clad Rod/ Image Conduit” Nov. 2004, 1 page.Applicant
Selberg, Erik, and Oren Etzioni. “On the Instability of Web Search Engines.” In the Proceddings of RIAO, Paris, Apr. 2000, 14pp.Applicant
Smithwick, Quinn Y. J., Juris Vagners, Per G. Reinhall, Eric J. Seibel. “54.3: Modeling and Control of the Resonant Fiber Scanner for Laser Scanning Display or Acquisition,” SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, vol. 34, Issue 1, May 2003: 1455-1457.Applicant
Sonka, Milan , Vaclav Hlavac, and Roger Boyle, Image Processing, Analysis, and Machine Vision: (Second Edition). International Thomson Publishing, 1998. Contents, Index, Preface, 37pp.Applicant
Sony. “Sony Puppy Fingerprint Identity Products.” http://bssc.sel.sony.com/Professional/puppy/, 2002, 1 p.Applicant
Spitz, A. Lawrence. “Progress in Document Reconstruction.” Document Recognition Technologies, Inc. 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR '02), 2002, 4pp.Applicant
Spitz, A. Lawrence. “Shape-based Word Recognition.” International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, Oct. 20, 1998, 13 pp.Applicant
Srihari, Sargur N., Jonathan J. Hull, and Ramesh Choudhari. “Integrating Diverse Knowledge Sources in Text Recognition.” ACM Transactions in Office Information Systems. vol. 1, No. 1, Jan. 1983, pp. 68-87.Applicant
Stevens, Jacob, Andrew Gee, and Chris Dance. “Automatic Processing of Document Annotations.” Xerox Reserach Centre Europe. http://www.bmva.ac.uk/bmvc/1998/pdf/p062.pdf, 1998, 11 pp.Applicant
Su, Guo-Dung J., Shl-Sheng Lee, and Ming C. Wu. “Optical Scanners Realized by Surface—Micromachined Vertical Torsion Mirror” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 11, No. 5, May 1999, 3pp.Applicant
Syscan Imaging. “Travelscan 464.” http://www.syscaninc.com/prod—ts—464.html, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 2pp.Applicant
Taghva, Kazem, Julie Borsack, and Allen Condit. “Results of Applying Probabilistic IR to OCR Text.” Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Reserach and Development in Information Retrieval. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag New York, 1994, pp. 202-211.Applicant
Tan, Chew Lim, Sam Yuan Sung, Zhauhui Yum and Yi Xu. “Text Retrieval from Document Images Based on N-Gram Algorithm.” PRICAI Workshop on Text and Web Mining, 2000. 2 pp.Applicant
Trusted Reviews. “Digital Pen Roundup.” http://www.trustedreviews.com/article.aspx?art=183, Jan. 24, 2004. 5pp.Applicant
TYI Systems Ltd. “Bellus iPen.” http://www.bellus.com.tw/pen—scanner.htm, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 3pp.Applicant
U.S. Precision Lens, Inc. The Handbook of Plastic Optics a User's Guide with Emphasis on Injection Molded Optics. Cincinnati, Ohio: U.S. Precision Lens, Inc., 1983, 145pp.Applicant
Van Eijkelenborg, Martijn A. “Imaging with Microstructured Polymer Fibre.” Optics Express, vol. 12, No. 2, Jan. 26, 2004, pp. 342-346.Applicant
Vervoort, Marco. “Emile 4.1.6 User Guide” University of Amsterdam, Jun. 12, 2003, 83 pp.Applicant
Vocollect. “Vocollect Voice for Handhelds.” http://www.vocollect.com/offerings/voice—handhelds.php, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 2pp.Applicant
Vossler, Charles M. and Neil M. Branston. “The Use of Context for Correcting Garbled English Text.” Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Inc.. Proceedings of the 1964 19th ACM National Conference. NY, NY: ACM Press, 13 pp.Applicant
Wang, Jin, and Jack Jean. “Segmentation of Merged Characters by Neural Network and Shortest-Path.” Proceedings of the 1993 ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing: States of the Art and Practice. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1993, pp. 762-769.Applicant
Wang, Wei-Chih, Mark Fauver, Jou Nhut Ho, Eric J. Siebel, Per G. Reinhall. “Micromachined Optical Waveguide Cantilever as a Resonant Optical Scanner.” Sensors and Actuators A (Physical), 102(1-2), 2002, pp. 165-175.Applicant
Wang, Yalin, Ihsin T. Phillips, and Robert M. Naralick. “A Study on the Document Zone Content Classification Problem.” Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems. London: Springer-Verlag, 2002, 12pp.Applicant
WizCom Technologies Ltd. “QuickLink-Pen Elite.” http://www.wizcomtech.com/Wizcom/products/product—info.asp?fid=101, Accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 2pp.Applicant
WizCom Technologies. “SuperPen Professional Product Page.” http://www.wizcomtech.com/Wizcom/products/product—info.asp?fid=88&cp=1, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 2pp.Applicant
Xerox “Patented Technology Could Turn Camera Phone Into Portable Scanner.” Press release Nov. 15, 2004. http://www.xerox.com/go/xrx/template/inv—rel—newsroomisp?Xcntry=USA&Xlang=en—US&app=Newsroom&ed—name=NR—2004Nov15 —MobileDocument—Imaging—Software&formil=article&view=newsrelease&metrics=notrack, 2pp.Applicant
“Automatic Computer Translation,” www.lingolex.com/translationsoftware.htm, downloaded on Aug. 6, 2000.Applicant
Babylon—Online Dictionary and Translation Software, “Text Translations in 75 languages, all in a single click,” 1 page.Applicant
Black et al., “The Festival Speech Synthesis System,” Festival Speech Synthesis System—Table of Contents, http://www.cstr.ed.ac.uk/projects/festival manual/, Jun. 17th, 1999, pp. 1-4 [internet accessed on Jan. 10, 2008].Applicant
eBooks, eBooks Quickstart Guide, nI-487, 2001, 2 pages.Applicant
Gildea and Miller, “How Children Learn Words,” Scientific American, Sep. 1987, vol. 257, No. 3, pp. 94-99.Applicant
Globalink, Inc. “Globalink, Inc. announces Talk to Me, an interactive language learning software program,” “Talk to me” Software, Business Wire, Jan. 21, 1997, Fairfax, VA, 4 pages. [internet accessed on Jan. 4, 2008].Applicant
Henseler, Dr. Hans, “Functional and Document Level Security in ZylMAGE,” Zylab, the Paper Filing Company, ZylMAGE Security, Whitepaper, Apr. 9, 2004, 27 pgs, ZyLAB Technologies, B.V.Applicant
Jacobson et al., “The Last Book”, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 36, No. 3, 1997, pp. 457-463.Applicant
MachoII, R., “Translation Pen Lacks Practicality,” BYTE.com, Jan. 1998, 2 pages.Applicant
Nagy et al. “A Prototype Document Image Analysis System for Technical Journals,” Computer, vol. 25, issue 7, Jul. 1992, pp. 10-22.Applicant
O'Gorman, “Image and Document Processing Techniques for the Right Pages Electronic Library System,” 11th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Aug. 30-Sep. 3, 1992, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 260-263, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.Applicant
Pellissippi Library, NetLibrary, Skills Guide #4, Sep. 21, 2001, 9 pages.Applicant
Schuuring, D., “Best practices in e-discovery and e-disclosure,” ZyLAB Information Access Solutions, White Paper, Feb. 17, 2006, 72 pgs, ZyLAB Distributing, B.V.Applicant
Sheridon et al., “The Gyricon -A Twisting Ball Display,” Proceedings of the Society for Information Display, Third and Fourth Quarter, May 1977, pp. 289-293, Boston, MA.Applicant
Stifelman,Lisa J., “Augmenting Real-World Objects: A Paper-Based Audio Notebook,” Proceedings of CHI '96, 1996, pp. 199-200.Applicant
Story et al. “The Right Pages Image-Based Electronic Library for Alerting and Browsing,” Computer, vol. 25, No. 9, Sep. 1992, pp. 17-26.Applicant
The Festival Speech Synthesis System, www.cstr.ed.ac.uk/projects/festival downloaded on Jul. 25, 2000, 2 pages [internet accessed Jan. 4,2008].Applicant
Toshifumi et al., “PaperLink: A Technique for Hyperlinking from Real Paper to Electronic Content,” Proceedings of CHI 1997, pp. 1-13, CHI 97 Electronic Publications: Papers.Applicant
Whittaker et al., “Filochat: Handwritten Notes Provide Access to Recorded Conversations,” Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '94 Conference Proceedings, Apr. 24-28, 1994, pp. 271-277, Boston Massachusetts.Applicant
Whittaker et al., “Using Cognitive Artifacts in the Design of Mulimodal Interfaces,” AT&T Labs-Research, May 24, 2004, 63 pages.Applicant
Wilcox et al., “Dynomite: A Dynamically Organized Ink and Audio Notebook,” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Jun. 3, 1998, 9 pages.Applicant
Press Release, “Abera Introduces Truly Portable & Wireless Color Scanners: Capture Images Anywhere in the World without Connection to PC,” PR Newswire, Oct. 9, 2000, New York, http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=62278377&sid=5&Fmt=7&clientid=19649&RQT=309&VName=PQD, 3 pages.Applicant
Hull, Jonathan and Dar-Shyang Lee, Simultaneous Highlighting of Paper and Electronic Documents, © 2000 IEEE, pp. 401-404.Applicant
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US05/11017, date of mailing Jul. 15, 2008, 2 pages.Applicant
PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US05/11089, date of mailing Jul. 8, 2008, 3 pages.Applicant
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/098,038, Mail Date Apr. 3, 2008, Examiner J. Ouellette, 11 pages.Applicant
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,828, Mail Date May 22, 2008, Examiner Y. Garg, 38 pages.Applicant
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/098,014, Mail Date Jun. 18, 2008, Examiner Y. Garq, 37 pages.Applicant
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,833, Mail Date Jun. 25, 2008, Examiner J. Zurita 58 pages.Applicant
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,836, Mail Date May 13, 2008, Examiner B. Xue, 56 pages.Applicant
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,835, Mail Date Jun. 23, 2008, Examiner E. Hur, 26 pages.Applicant
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/098,043, Mail Date Apr. 17, 2008, Examiner A. Ng, 45 pages.Applicant