US 7,702,540 B1Grant
Computer-implement method and system for conducting auctions on the internet
Issue Date:2010-04-20
•157 Claims
•14 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
Methods and apparatus for a system for facilitating electronic commerce transactions with a first data storage location for holding information about an item for auction from a first participant in a data packet network, a verification process that verifies the user identification of the first participant in said data packet network, the verification process confirming a user identification before allowing the participant in said data packet network access to place information about an item for auction in the system, a display process for displaying information of the item for auction to a plurality of data packet network users, the display process displaying an advertisement with the item for auction to the plurality of data packet users, an auction process for receiving bids on the item for auction from at least one of said plurality of data packet network users, the auction process also verifying a user identification from said at least one of a plurality of data packet network users before allowing receipt of the bid and a notification process for notifying the plurality of data packet network participants that said bid was accepted by said system.
Metadata
Assignee
- eBay Inc.
Inventor
- Thomas G. Woolston
Application Information
Application Number:US 09/253,014
Filing Date:1999-02-19
Priority Date:1995-04-26
Art Unit:3625
Classifications
IPC:
G06Q30/00G06F17/30
Patent Drawings (14 sheets)
Description
[0001] This is a request for filing divisional application under 37 C.F.R. § 1.53(b) which claims priority of prior applications, application Ser. No. 09/166,779, filed on Oct. 6, 1998, entitled CONSIGNMENT NODES by the following named inventor Thomas G. Woolston, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/554,704 filed on Nov. 7, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,845,265, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/427,820, filed on Apr. 26, 1995 now abandoned, both entitled CONSIGNMENT NODES.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates to used and collectible goods offered for sale by an electronic network of consignment stores. More specifically, the present invention may be an electronic “market maker” for collectable and used goods, a means for electronic “presentment” of goods for sale, and an electronic agent to search the network for hard to find goods. In a second embodiment to the present invention, a low cost posting terminal allows the virtual presentment of goods to market and establishes a two tiered market of retail and wholesale sales.
[0003] Certain items and used goods have a large following of collectors. These items include baseball cards, dolls, pens, watches, comic books, stamps, coins, and the like. It is well known to establish shops specializing in these items. It is also well-known to establish boards for the sale of used goods. And is known to sell new goods on a special television channel like the Home Shopping Channel.
[0004] The prior art does not provide a means to electronically market used goods or provide an avenue to allow participants to speculate on the price of collectable or used goods in an electronic market place. Moreover, the art does not show a way for small to medium size business to use a low cost posting terminal in conjunction with a market maker computer to collectively create a virtual market for used and collectible goods. Thus, to address the short comings of the art the present invention has the following objectives:
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] To establish a low cost computer means for a used good and/or consignment stores to establish a “trusted” computerized market for used and collectible goods.
[0006] To establish a computer means to administrate and provide inventory tracking to used good and/or consignment stores when the stores make a virtual presentment of a good to a computerized market and the good is sold at the virtual market and/or the good is sold through the store front.
[0007] To establish a computer means to double tier a computerized market for goods, where the first tier is a retail price and the second tier is a wholesale or dealer to dealer price and an authorized dealer has pre-approved access to the dealer-to-dealer price and may charge and display the retail price to a local store customer.
[0008] To establish a computer means for archiving records of transactions in a computerized market for collectible and used goods and distributing the archive to computer terminals that may then research and analyze valuation and price trends of collectible and used goods in the computerized market.
[0009] To establish a computer means for a used good store or consignment store to sell used goods and collectibles electronically and to provide the automatic electronic re-sale of goods purchased.
[0010] To establish a market for goods with a dominant electronic “market maker” node to allow collectors to speculate on the collectable goods market.
[0011] To provide the excitement of a “live” auction house type atmosphere to remote participants in a electronic auction.
[0012] To provide data analysis to the market makers of collectable good or consignment node users on the price, price movements, and quantity of collectable goods in the virtual market.
[0013] To provide an electronic agent interface for participants to search a plurality of consignment nodes to search for a used good or collectable item.
[0014] To provide a means to track down the owner of a particular used or collectable good.
[0015] Further, to provide a trusted network of consignment nodes that act as brokers to provide a means to electronically present a used good or collectable to an electronic market.
[0016] The foregoing objects and advantages of the invention are illustrative of those which can be achieved by the present invention and are not intended to be exhaustive or limiting of the possible advantages which can be realized. Thus, these and other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description herein or can be learned from practicing the invention, both as embodied herein or as modified in view of any variations which may be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly the present invention resided in the novel methods, arrangements, combinations and improvements herein shown and described.
[0017] The present invention is a network of consignment nodes and a low cost easy to use posting terminal for the virtual presentment of goods to market. A consignment node is a computer database of used goods preferably operated by a used good, collectable shop keeper or a bailee. A posting terminal is a low cost easy to use computer and computer peripheral devices used by a small store owner to present goods to a computerized marker and track the sales of goods and control the posted inventory. All consignment nodes users or operators, hereinafter users, are “trusted” licensees or franchisers of the software and hardware necessary to create and operate a consignment node. Thus, the network provides a trusted means for consignment node users, e.g. shop keepers, to establish electronic markets for collectable goods, establish electronic auctions, establish a means for searching each others shops to locate hard to find collectibles items, and a means to electronically present goods to a market. The present invention will allow, or license, certain consignments nodes to become a dominant market maker for a particular class of goods, for example, a consignment node franchise may be given the rights to establish the dominant market for collectable antique pens. It is understood, a central market maker computer may be virtually divided into different markets with posting terminals used as the means for the market to obtain virtual title goods. Other consignment nodes, after taking physical possession of a good, may make an electronic presentment of that good to such a dominant consignment node market. Thus, a local collector of antique pens may bring a pen to a convenient consignment node in Smalltown, USA, the consignment network would allow this collector to electronically “present” his pen to the dominant market make node for antique pens in for example, Chicago. Participants, e.g. customers and collectors (hereinafter “participants”), may reach a dominant node's market, or any other consignment nodes electronic store, from his or her home by logging on from a PC located at the participant's home to their locally operated consignment node and reaching the distant consignment node through the network of consignment nodes. Thus, each consignment node user, e.g. shop keeper, has a potential participant, i.e. customer base, of all consignment node participants. In other words, a potentially huge customer base that incurs the minimal cost of a local consignment node connection may reach any other consignment node through the consignment node network. And local collector's may economically participate in the collectable markets by using local access to a convenient consignment node “trusted” bailee, and electronically presenting collectable goods to an electronic market.
[0018] A consignment node in a simple form may have a computer 10, a digital camera 12, a bar code scanner 14, a display 16, a printer 20, a keyboard 18, a database 22 and a network connection 26 collectively called hereinafter a consignment node. The present invention also has a user interface application program to execute an a user or participant's data terminal 28.
[0019] The consignment node may have four modes of operation: a software download mode, an auction mode, a market mode, and an agent mode. The software download mode allows a participant to log into the consignment node and receive a download of a participant interface application program. The auction mode allows a participant, from the participant interface application program, to log into a consignment node to partake in an electronic auction. The market mode allows a participant with the participant interface program to log into a consignment node to browse the consignment node database to search for a used or collectable good. The agent mode allows a participant to log into a consignment node to formulate a search request for a particular used good or collectable. The consignment node may search its own database for the requested good and/or generate agents to search and report back a search request of other consignment nodes.
[0020] The present invention may allow a participant to electronically purchase goods from a consignment node and to select whether the good should be shipped to a participant designed location or the participant may take electronic legal ownership of a good and post a new participant defined offer or reserve price. By the interaction of a plurality of participants buying and selling collectibles on a consignment node, posting “buy at” and “sell at” quantities and prices the consignment node may establish a market or become a “market maker” for collectable goods. A participant may also elect to electronically transfer or present a good to a different consignment node or market. This allows a participant to speculate with collectable goods on the consignment node network's different markets and not incur the shipping costs with physically moving the goods, while providing a trusted means to assure potential buyers of the gqod's bona fide availability and legal title.
[0021] The consignment node operator or purveyor, hereinafter referred to as the consignment node user, establishes his consignment node by creating a database of used goods or collectibles, hereinafter the term “goods” shall be used to reflect used goods, new goods and collectibles. The user takes the first good to be put on the database and invokes the consignment node software to create a data record. For example, the user owns a baseball card collector shop and the user wants to post his Babe Ruth collection. The user in this instance invokes the consignment node to “build the database mode” and the invention initializes the digital camera 15. The user then “photographs” or digitizes the image of the particular Babe Ruth card. The consignment system then displays an empty database record on the display to accept text information concerning the card.
[0022] The user fills out the display record with information concerning the particular Babe Ruth card. The consignment node verifies that enough information has been filled out in the displayed computer record, as well known to the electronic database arts, and accepts the record. It should be noted that the consignment node database record has data fields for the consignment node user to add value to his consignment node postings with subjective information such as condition of the card, special features such as autographed by Babe Ruth, and the like. Thus, the consignment node user may build business goodwill into his particular consignment node operation by establishing his own particular subjectivity and quality standards in item postings.
[0023] After the data record or the particular Babe Ruth card is accepted by the consignment node the system may print out a bar code label on the printer 20. The user may then put the particular Babe Ruth card into a plastic bag and affix the bar code label to the bag. The bar code labeling system becomes a useful inventory management tool discussed below.
[0024] It is understood in this first example that the consignment node user is the legal and equitable owner of the Babe Ruth card and that the user posted a reserve or offer price on the particular card at his posting. In a second illustrative example, a local resident would like to post, for example, his Frank Robinson baseball card. The resident brings his Frank Robinson card to the baseball card store and tells the consignment node user he would like to offer his Frank Robinson card for a consignment sale. Again, the consignment node user invokes the system database posting mode and “photographs” the Frank Robinson card with digital camera 12. As above, the user fills in the system generated display prompt for information concerning the Frank Robinson card. The resident informs the user of the reserve or offer price and signs or agrees to a consignment contract with the consignment node user to accept the consignment terms to pay the consignment node user on the sale of the card, for example 6%, of sales price as a consignment fee. Again, the system may print the appropriate bar code for the Frank Robinson card. The consignment node user then takes possession of the card and may affix the bar code label to an appropriate cardholder. It should be noted by the consignment node user may again “add value” to his consignment node by entering subjective criteria in the database entry for authenticity, condition, special attributes and the like. The participant or local resident may now electronically present his Frank Robinson card to any consignment node, consignment node auction or consignment node market maker in the consignment node network.
[0025] These processes may be repeated again and again to establish a substantial database of goods for sale. It should be noted that the consignment node user may at his discretion take postings from reputable dealers or collectors via a facsimile machine or other forms of electronic or verbal presentment of a good for sale. It is within the sound discretion of an individual consignment node user to establish these practices. It is within the scope of the invention, however, to take electronic postings from other consignment node users or individuals over the network, as discussed below. Each consignment node user may be a franchisee of a central franchiser and the franchiser may police the network to give quality control, detect fraud and revoke the franchises or licenses of poor quality consignment node users. Thus, the consignment node is a “trusted” network for consignment node users providing value to the network by imposing a quality and performance structure on the consignment nodes. The same franchise enforcement scheme is also available to the low cost posting terminal embodiment to the present invention.
The Sale
[0026] A buyer, hereinafter participant, may electronically log onto a consignment node via a network connection by use of a PC with participant interface software, through an interactive television application, workstation, internet browser or the like. The network connection drivers for the consignment node are discussed in detail below. The participant may enter the browse node and peruse the consignment node database of goods. It is understood that the participant may receive the image taken with a digital camera 12 of the goods at the participant terminal. The participant, upon finding for example the above-posted Frank Robinson card may decide to purchase the card. The participant may present electronic payment to the consignment node by entering a credit card number and expiration date or other forms of electronic payment. It is understood that a secure and/or encrypted means may be established between a participant's interface application and a consignment node to transfer sensitive or theft prone information. Moreover, a participant may establish an account with his local consignment node to be debited and credited with the funds used and generated with his transactions.
[0027] The consignment node may, for example, clear the transaction by charging the participant's charge card account and crediting the consignment node store account by well-known credit card clearing techniques. After the consignment node has cleared the transaction the system electronically transfers ownership of the Frank Robinson card to the participant. The participant may then be presented with the choice of directing the delivery of the Frank Robinson card to a desired location or may choose to post a new reserve or offer price for the card and direct the card to remain in the possession of the consignment node user. Thus, the consignment node allows a participant to speculate on the price of the Frank Robinson card and establishes an electronic market for the Frank Robinson card. It is understood that the consignment node may have many Frank Robinson cards available, thus by the interaction of collectors electronically buying and selling the collectibles it will establish a market price for a Frank Robinson card or any other good. For each transaction, the consignment node user extracts the small consignment fee, e.g., 6% of the sales price, thus the consignment node user directly benefits from operating a reputable consignment node. If the participant elects to take delivery of the purchased goods then the consignment node may track the delivery and ownership of this good to this particular participant in a data record. This data record may be useful to speed the posting of the good, should the participant later decide to re-post and sell the good, and it also creates a valuable database of records to track the possession and ownership of a collectable. This feature may be useful in the agent mode, e.g., tracking down very hard to find items, discussed more fully below.
The Auction
[0028] For a rare good, a good in a volatile market, or a good's initial posting the consignment node user or participant may wish to auction the good, with or without reserve, to the highest bidder. In this mode, the good may be posted on the consignment node by the means described above but the data record representing the good is identified as waiting for an auction date and may not be purchased on the electronic market. Alternatively, an item may be in the electronic market of the consignment node with a high reserve price that may be lowered in the auction or liquidation mode. Here the consignment node user or the good's participant owner may enter a protected data field a confidential reserve price for the auction mode. The consignment node user arranges by invoking the appropriate consignment node program a time and date for an electronic auction. The consignment node user or good's participant owner may establish, in a data record that represents the good, a desire for the item to be auctioned. For example, a pawnshop operator of a consignment node may have several Rolex watches he wishes to auction with reserve this Saturday night at 7:00 p.m. The consignment node user, here a pawnshop, identifies on the Rolex watch records the auction date and the confidential reserve price. The consignment node system may “advertise” auction dates, items and auction terms in the consignment node log on welcome message discussed below. Moreover, a good that is identified as awaiting an auction date may be viewed before auction in the consignment node browse mode by a perspective auction participant.
[0029] At the auction date, perspective participants log onto the consignment node auction mode locally or through the consignment node network and await the first good to be auctioned. It is understood that in the best mode of the invention the participant will have a data terminal with a digital to analog converter such as a “sound blaster” and speaker, the digital to analog capability may be used in the auction mode to bring the aural excitement of an auction, e.g., the call of the heckler, the caller and bidders, home to the auction participant. This is discussed in more detail below.
[0030] The consignment node takes the first item to be auctioned and posts the image of the good and the good's text record to the participants. The consignment node then posts the opening bid. It is understood that the bid postings may be in a protocol that invokes the generation of an auctioneer's voice at the participant terminals. The participants may then respond with a higher bid. The consignment node mode scans electronically the participants for bids and accepts the highest bid. If bids are tied the consignment node may take the first highest bid by the participants log on order. A particular bidding participant receives a special acknowledgment from the consignment node that her bid was accepted. The consignment node then posts the higher bid to all the electronic auction participants. The consignment node repeats this process until no higher bid is received for a predetermined amount of time and closes the auctioning of that particular good. The consignment node then checks whether the highest bid received is greater than the reserve price, if appropriate. The consignment node may then post sold! and the sell price to all participant terminals and proceed to post the next item for auction. Again a successful purchaser may elect to direct delivery of the good or post the good on the electronic market at a new participant determined offer price.
[0031] It is understood that the terms of the auction sale are posted and agreed to by the participants before allowing a participant to bid on goods in compliance with local requirements and statutes. It is also understood that a participant may make electronic payment for the goods or establish a line of credit or collect on delivery terms within a particular consignment node user's discretion. This may be established by a relationship between a local consignment node user and a local participant at the local consignment user's discretion.
[0032] It should be noted that a consignment node user may sell virtual advertising space or a central master node e.g., the franchiser, may coordinate the sale of advertising space on a pool of consignment nodes to reach target market participants. For example, if a participant has purchased or speculated in antique pens, and advertisers of an antique pen specially consignment node wishes to target market individuals on the network who have purchased collectable pens in the past. A central coordinated master node may sell advertising to an advertiser for the log on message or e-mail targeted participants and users. Thus, the network of consignment nodes can establish a market for target marketing or blanketed advertising of goods and services sold locally or on a network level by a central node.
The Agent
[0033] The Agent Mode allows a consignment node participant to search a plurality of consignment nodes and purchase records for a used good. A participant may log onto his local consignment node to shop. This participant, for example, may be interested in purchasing a particular used coin for her collection. The participant may invoke a consignment node Agent to search the network of consignment nodes for this coin. The participant fills in the search parameters for this coin, for example, a 1872 U.S. penny from the Denver Mint. The consignment node Agent task handler verifies the Agent form is sufficiently filled out and accepts the task. The Agent checks a list of other consignment nodes network addresses kept by the local consignment node database and generates an Agent communication message to each consignment node on the list and begins to establish communications to the other consignment nodes. An Agent message between consignment nodes begins by coordinating or reconciling the database on each consignment node of the locations and/or address of other consignment nodes. If a consignment node has a different list of consignment nodes in its database it will pass the node update information to the other consignment node. The consignment node originating the Agent task will generate a new Agent task to accommodate the information concerning the new consignment node. Once the consignment node database of consignment nodes is reconciled, the Agent will search the consignment node database for the goods requested. The Agent will report back whether the search of the local market database was successful and how many good that matches the Agent search request it found. An Agent may also search the consignment node database of past transactions to identify an owner of a particular good. The Agent may then report that John Doe of Main Street, U.S.A. was the last known purchaser of a 1872 U.S. penny from the Denver Mint at this node. It is understood that differing levels of privacy are available to consignment node purchasers, so as only allowing the local consignment node user to view past purchaser information and/or provide the Agent with an option of contacting that consignment user so he may contact the prior purchaser, thus, protecting privacy while allowing bona fide offers to reach the prior purchaser in confidence.
[0034] Once some of the Agents start reporting back to the Agent originating consignment node, the originating consignment node may report the results to the consignment node participant of the Agents' results. Such results may give the total number of matching items found thus providing the local participant/collector an indication of the depth of this market. It is understood that a local consignment node user may charge participants for Agent requests.
Computer Implementation
[0035] In the preferred embodiment of the present invention a consignment node may use a multitasking operating system such as UNIX, OS/2, NT or VMS. However, a Microsoft DOS or Windows implementation is within the scope of the present invention. The consignment node may be networked via TCP/IP and the internet or a private TCP/IP network or X.25 private or public network or service providers network of ISDN, ATM and the like. It is understood, that a consignment node may support a plurality of protocols simultaneously. Moreover, it is understood that the participant interface application program may execute on a wide variety of platforms such as PC's, MAC's, Power PC's, workstations, cable set-top boxes, video game hardware and the like and are within the scope of the present invention. The posting terminal embodiment is discussed in detail below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0036] FIG. 1 shows the consignment node of the present invention may have a computer 10, a data storage device 22, a tape drive 24, a digital camera 12, a bar code scanner 14, a display 16, a keyboard 18, a laser printer 20, and a network connection 26. A participant user terminal is shown at 28.
[0037] FIG. 2 shows a schematic block diagram showing the logic flow of a user log in at a consignment node.
[0038] FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing the logical flow of the consignment node auction process.
[0039] FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing the logical flow of the consignment node market or browse mode.
[0040] FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram showing the logical flow for posting a new used good on the consignment node.
[0041] FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a subroutine that may be used to post auction bids.
[0042] FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a subroutine that may be used by the consignment node auction process to receive participant auction bids.
[0043] FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram showing the logical flow for a subroutine that may be used to transfer ownership of an item.
[0044] FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram showing the logical flow for a consignment node in-store sale of a good.
[0045] FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram showing the logical flow of post-processing and analyzing consignment node sales.
[0046] FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram showing the logical flow of the consignment node Agent handler subroutine.
[0047] FIG. 12 is a block diagram of the posting terminal to market maker computer connections.
[0048] FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a user interface on a posting terminal or consignment node.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0049] It is understood that the get session identification procedure 100 is a routine that monitors the communication ports and virtual communication ports residing on a protocol stack. The consignment node may use, for example, a X.25 interface card, available from Eicon Corporation or Frontier Corporation to execute an X.25 protocol stack in a PC workstation. The get session identification 100 program may monitor the X.25 protocol for incoming calls. If the program identifies an incoming call it may answer the call by transmitting the appropriate X.25 packet to the network on the appropriate virtual channel. It is understood that other protocols, such as TCP/IP, DECNET, SNA and ATM are within the scope of the present invention and that multiple protocol stacks may simultaneously execute in a consignment node. Therefore, the get session identification program 100 may have multiple instances to connect and monitor the various protocols. After the get session identification 100 has appropriately answered an incoming call to the consignment node, it may invoke the display welcome message and menu routine 102.
[0050] It is understood that the get session identification 100 provides sufficient information to the display welcome message and menu 102 to allow the display welcome message and menu 102 to connect to the appropriate session or virtual channel. At this juncture, if the participant is using an approved interface program, the interface program will send a predetermined code to indicate its version and other characteristics of its display driver. If a participant is logging in from a TTY terminal or other terminal the display welcome message and menu 102 may detect this information and send the appropriate TTY welcome message. This procedure may also be used to identify features and languages supported on various internet world wide web browsers. It is understood that the welcome message is viewed by the consignment node user as virtual advertising space that may be sold by the consignment node user or coordinated with the master control node (discussed in detail below). The participant may respond to the display welcome message and menu 102 program by giving an appropriate log on response 104. The get log on response 104 may verify and grant a level of access privileges to the participant. It is understood that the consignment node user may require the get log in response 104 to retrieve a credit card number, pin number, user ID and the like, to grant access privileges. If a participant is using a TTY terminal those sessions may be shunted to the download interface program (DIP) 106 routine to receive an appropriate interface program from the consignment node. The DIP 106 may present a list of choices as to what version interface program should be downloaded, such as DOS, Windows, UNIX, MAC platforms and what transfer program is desired such as Kermit, Xmodem, FTP and the like. A participant with a participant interface program may also elect to receive a new interface program from the DIP 106. It is understood that an older, no longer supported interface program participant may be shunted to the DIP 106 to receive a new interface program.
[0051] A participant with a supported interface program may select the auction 108, market 110 or agent handler 112 sections of the consignment node. If a participant selects auction 108 the participant may be presented with a menu of auction selections such as auctions in session, future auction times, dates, locations and topics, and auction preview. If a participant selects auctions in session the participants' session is passed to the appropriate auction handler, as discussed below. If a participant selects future auctions the participant will be given a list of future auction times, dates, terms, locations and topics of auctions on this and other consignment nodes. It is understood that these displays represent a virtual advertising opportunity for the consignment node user and the advertising space may be sold by the consignment node user or by the master control node. If the participant selects the auction preview, the auction process 108 passes the participant session to the market session 110 with data that indicates an auction preview desired by the user.
[0052] If the participant selects the market 110 choice the participant is given a menu of markets that the participants may browse, discussed further below. If the participant selects the agent handler 112 the participant may be provided with an electronic form to create a search for a good. The participant may then execute this Agent's search request to search the network of consignment nodes databases to look for the desired goods. The Agent is discussed more fully below. The Agent Handler 112 also receives incoming calls from other agents to process the external agents search request on the consignment node. The participant interface and consignment node participant functions are discussed in detail below. It is understood that the agent may also function between virtual markets on a market maker computer and with the transaction archive database discussed below. The discussion now turns to the operation of the consignment node by the user.
[0053] FIG. 3 shows a logical flow diagram of the steps the consignment node may use to create a database record of a good for sale or for auction.
[0054] The consignment node user may invoke the consignment node program to enter the posting 200 mode to create a data record for the good. The posting 200 mode initializes 204 the consignment node to receive information on a new good. The initialization 204 step displays a data record with data fields on the consignment node terminal for the user to fill in information on the good. The initialization step 204 also initializes the consignment node peripheral devices such as the digital camera 12 and the printer 20. The consignment node user then “photographs” or digitizes the image of the good from one or more perspectives as well known to the digital camera arts. The consignment node receives the digitized image(s) at receive image 206 step. The consignment node program then prompts the consignment node user for information on the good 208. The consignment node receives information 210 that the consignment node user inputs to the data record displayed at step 208. The consignment node program verifies 212 that the necessary information, such as owners name, reserve price, market or auction designation is in the data record. The verify step 212 will reject the record and return the consignment node user data entry mode 210 if the record does not have the minimum information. If the record is verified 212 as complete enough to commit to the consignment node database, a data record is created 214 and linked into the consignment node database. The consignment node program then generates and prints a bar code 216 that indicated the data record. The bar code system is used by the consignment node to maintain an accurate inventory and is a hook for local sales (discussed below). The posting routine may then exit 218 and return from the posting program. By repeating the posting routine of FIG. 3 the consignment node user may build a database of goods for the consignment node market, auction and/or agent searches.
[0055] FIG. 4 shows the logical block flow diagram of the processes the consignment node may take to execute an auction. It is understood that the consignment node user may manually invoke the auction process, or may schedule the consignment node to execute the auction process. The auction process begins by initializing 250 the data structures, records, queues and the like to conduct the auction process. The connection between the auction process and auction participants is discussed below. The auction process gets the first item to be auctioned 252 from the database of goods to be auctioned 254. The consignment node then calculates the opening bid 256 by a predetermined formula such as 50% of the reserve or general solicitation of an opening bid is posted to the auction participants 258. The consignment node auction mode then scans the participants for a higher bids 262. If a higher bid is found the new bid is posted 264. It is understood that the steps of checking for bids 260 determines if the bid is higher 262 and posting the new higher bid 264 is repeated until no higher bids are received. After the typical auction closing of going once . . . twice . . . three times the auction is closed 266. The consignment node auction program then compares the highest bid received with the good's reserve price 268 to determine whether to transact the sale. If the highest bid is greater than the reserve price the consignment node auction process posts sold! for xxx amount to the auction participants and calls the transfer ownership subroutine 270, discussed further below, and transfers the ownership of the good. If the highest bid is less than the reserve price the consignment node auction process announces no sale! 272 to the auction participants. The auction process then proceeds 274 to get the next good to be auctioned 278. The consignment node auction process is then repeated until all the goods to be auctioned have been run through 278. The consignment node auction may then close and terminate the participant sessions 280. It is understood that the transfer ownership 270 sub-routine may require time to clear the transaction and, therefore, may be best implement as a spawned child process to the auction process. This will keep the consignment node auction executing at an exciting and fast pace for the participants. The consignment node auction process itself may execute in several instances to provide simultaneous auctions on a consignment node. Thus a consignment node may conduct several simultaneous auctions on several virtual runways. It is understood that in the auction mode the consignment node and the participant interface software may communicate using a protocol that allows the consignment node auction driver to “point to” locations stored in the participant interface software, to cause the participant interface software to generate the sound of a auctioneers voice on the sound blaster, or equivalent board. Thus, the present invention uses pre-stored sound samples of different auction prices and auctioneer “string” along aural calls inside the participant interface software, and allows the generation of said pre-stored sound bites to be invoked by the consignment node driver through the said special protocol. This method greatly reduces the bandwidth necessary for a consignment node to support the generation of exciting auctioneers calls at a plurality of participant terminals. It is understood that the generation of an audio bit stream from the consignment node to the participant terminals is also with the scope of the present invention.
[0056] FIG. 5 shows the logical flow for the post bid subroutine 300. The post bid sub-routine may be invoked from several consignment node processes, those specifically described thus far are the post opening bid 258 and posting bid 264 logical processes. The post bid 300 sub-routine is used to communicate between a consignment node and multiple participants. The post bid 300 sub-routine gets participant session identifications 302 from a data record or data structure that contains a list of session identifications of participants who have logged onto the auction sessions. The next step sends the bid passed to the post bid 300 subroutine to each participant session identified in the data structure 306. Bids are posted to each participant through an appropriate driver 308. The driver may be identified for each particular user session. For example, a PC user logged into the consignment node via an X.25 virtual channel may require a host PAD driver in the consignment node to communicate asynchronously to the PC terminal interface application. A network user may require a TCP/IP driver to connect between the consignment node and the participant networked terminal. After communicating the bid to participants through the appropriate device driver 308, the post bid sub-routine may exit and return 310 to the calling routine.
[0057] FIG. 6 shows the consignment node subroutine to check participant sessions for bids during the auction mode. Check for bids 350 maybe a subroutine called by the auction program to scan for bids. It is understood that when a participant logs into the consignment node and selects the auction mode, (see FIG. 2 ), the participant's session identification is passed to a data structure. The data structure maybe used by the check for bids 350 sub-routine to correctly identify participants at a particular virtual auction. As noted above, the consignment node may support multiple simultaneous auctions, therefore, may require multiple instances of the aforesaid data structure. The check for bids sub-routine 350 opens or connects to the appropriate data structure storing or holding participant session identifications who are participating in the check for bids calling auction program instance at the get session identification step 352. The buffers associated with each session is scanned for an input 354. If a participant has input an “exit” command or symbol 356 the routine removes that participant's session identification from the auction identifying data structure and allows the participant to exit 362 the auction. The participant's session identification may be returned to a data structure that allows the participant to return to the consignment nodes main menu, see FIG. 2 , or terminate the participant session. The subroutine then compares the bids and takes the highest bid 358. If bids are tied for the highest bid the sub-routine may use the first received bid and reject the others 358. The sub-routine then notifies the participant session who had the highest bid 360. It is understood that the take the highest bid step 358 and notify bidder step 360 are aware of the current bid price for a good and will not allow a lower bid to be accepted. It is understood that the participant session buffers are flushed after they are scanned to remove old or latent bids. The check for bids sub-routine then returns to its calling routine.
[0058] FIG. 7 shows the transfer ownership routine 400 that may be used to transfer the ownership of goods and collectibles in the consignment node. The transfer ownership sub-routine may be called from several consignment node modes and processes to effect the transfer of legal ownership. The first step in the transfer ownership sub-routine 400 may be to verify a participant purchaser information 402. It is understood that the consignment node may use a variety of well known authenticating procedures to verify a participant, such verification techniques include personal identification numbers (PINS), passwords, call back, and a plethora of encryption techniques and personal information identification means to provide a reliable verification technique. It is understood that a consignment node user may have established a credit or deposit account for the participant from past sales or the transfer of funds and the verify step 402 may connect the participant to the account. The clear charge 404 step is used to clear the participant consignment node transaction. It is understood that this may be via an external credit card clearing network, a connection to a credit account, or though one of the many proposed electronic fund transfer schemes such as debit cards, e-money, and clearinghouses. After the transaction clears the charge 404, the consignment node credits the consignment node users commission account 406 to extract the consignment node transaction fee. The consignment node then transfers legal ownership 408 of the good by changing the ownership entry in the data record in the consignment node of the good. The consignment node may then print a record of the transaction 410. It is understood that step 410 may also be used to keep a log on the consignment node storage or tape drive. The consignment node then removes the good from sale or auction status 412. It is understood that the data record representing the good is “locked” during the transfer ownership sub-routine to prevent collisions of actions and transfers of the good. If the participant has elected to ship goods then the consignment node will print a shipping label 404 for the consignment node user to attach to the good for shipment. The transfer ownership routine may then exit 416. If the participant has elected to re-post the good or collectable the participant may specify a new reserve or offer price for the good or collectable. It is understood that the purchasing participant may elect to leave the good or collectable at the consignment node and post a new offer or reserve price and may identify that the good is on the market, e.g. may be bought and sold at any time, or that the good is awaiting an auction date. Moreover, the participant may elect to have the good viewable on the market or “invisible” to the market while awaiting an auction date 422. It is understood that the participant may elect to leave the good at the purchased consignment node and electronically transfer the offering of a good to another consignment node. It is understood that consignment node users may run a “trusted” network between consignment nodes to provide the trust between merchants, that the goods exists and that the network between the consignment nodes to provide for electronic presentment of a good is a secure network connection. This allows collectable goods to be concentrated for a single electronic auction or virtual collectable market on a market maker consignment node without incurring the costs of shipping the goods to a central location to bring the good to the market maker consignment node. It is understood that the trusted posting of goods on a market maker node is a value added feature a small town consignment node user can provide to his immediate collector community. It is understood that the master central node may also serve as a legal consignment node franchising authority to provide enforcement of integrity, security and quality control for the consignment node network.
[0059] FIG. 8 shows the consignment node routine that may be used to establish a virtual market. The market 450 may be selected from the consignment node main menu, see FIG. 2 , to allow a participant to browse the consignment node goods database. The market 450 will display to the participant market categories 452, categories may be defined by the consignment node user to reflect the specialization of his consignment node and the specialized markets or miscellaneous markets for his goods. The consignment node then gets the participants response 454 to the market choices. The consignment node may then display market sub-categories 456. Again, the consignment node user may specify market sub-categories to reflect the specialization of the consignment node. The consignment node may then display items 458 and get the participant or market user response 460 to the displayed choices. It is understood that the participant may browse or scroll through the goods on the market 462, 458, 460 until the participant responds with a desire to exit the market 463. If the response is a desire to transfer to the market root directory 464 then the consignment node will return the participant to the market subcategories 456. If the participant responded with a desire to terminate the session 466 the consignment node will exit the market and terminate the participant's session. It is understood that during the browse loop 458, 460, 462 a participant may elect to buy or make an offer on a good and may invoke the transfer ownership routine, see FIG. 7 , to effect the transfer of a good's ownership. It is also understood that a participant may make an offer on a good below the asking (or offered) price. Such a proposed offer may be stored by the consignment node and used to notify the good owner. The good owner may then accept the counter offer or reject. It is understood that a participant counter-offer may be made subject to an acceptance before date. It is also understood that a participant may establish a “buy at” or “sell at” price/quantity for any good in the market.
[0060] FIG. 9 shows a logical flow diagram of the process that may be use to transact the transfer of ownership of goods on a consignment node at the store where a consignment node may be located. The consignment node user invokes the store sale sub-routine 500 from a consignment node user terminal, see FIG. 1 . The consignment node user may use the bar code scanner to scan the bar code of the good for sale 502. It is understood that the consignment node user may manually recall or search the consignment node database for the data record of the good or may let the consignment node software use the bar code to automatically retrieve the record 504. The data record is then scanned to retrieve price and sale information on the good 506. It is important to note that a good, while on display at a consignment node user's shop may have transferred ownership and changed price via network participants. The consignment node then displays this information 508 at the consignment node user terminal. The store customer may then elect to purchase the good. The consignment node may process a store customer purchase request by calling the appropriate sub-routine to transfer ownership, see FIG. 7 , of the good.
[0061] FIG. 10 shows a logical process diagram for the central node to collect and process data concerning transactions on a plurality of consignment nodes and provide value added feed back to consignment node users on market positions and trends. Data processing 550 may be executed on a consignment node or the central node to extract transaction data from a consignment node. It is understood that the tape drive, or storage device may be used to log network transactions on the posting, auctioning, buying and selling of goods and collectibles on a consignment node. This information may be collected by the central node over the consignment node network. The central node may then plot sales, sale date, price over time and the like to create graphs of market performance 554. It is understood that the data correlation and processing steps 554, 556 may be customized to provide a particular consignment node user with useful market information. The central node may also provide hard copies or electronically transfer the information to the consignment node users. It is understood that this may be a value added feature of a service that may be provided by a franchiser. It is understood that the central node may log into a consignment node, with well known remote processing and data transfer techniques such as the logon and FTP UNIX utilities to make changes to the aforesaid virtual advertising space on a consignment node.
[0062] FIG. 11 shows the agent handler the consignment node may use to establish agent-to-agent and consignment node-to-consignment node connections to process participant agent requests. The agent handler 600 may be entered by a predetermined series of codes and verification procedures to verify a request for an agent connection to the consignment node is from a bona fide agent and a bona fide consignment node. Once this is verified the agent handler may establish a session for the requesting agent 602. The requesting agent may then transfer its agents request to the consignment node 604 and the consignment node may then check its local database 606 to try to match the agents search request. The agent handler may then respond to the agents request 608 and terminate the agent session 610.
[0063] A second embodiment to the present invention, shown in FIG. 12 , uses a low cost portable “posting” terminal to allow the virtual presentment of goods to market. The posting terminal has a digital camera, a bar code printer, a bar code scanner, a modem and posting terminal software. The posting terminal works in conjunction with a market maker computer. The market maker computer has a database of goods for sale, a posting/de-posting communication handler, a database to world wide web (www) mapping module, a www server, a transaction process, a posting terminal communication manager, a sold database, a shipping database and an account database and has much of the functionality of the previously described consignment node.
[0064] The posting terminal and market maker computer functional block diagram is shown in FIG. 12 . The posting terminal has a camera interface 701, and image processing module 702, a record maker module 704, a storage unit 710, for storing images and records that have not been posted, a post module 712, a select records module 714, a post request module 716, a print bar code module 718, a get mail module 720, a storage unit for holding posted records and return codes 722, a de-post module 724, a get code module 726, and de-post request module 728, a bar code scanner interface 730, another instance of the get mail module 720, a mail sales routine 738, a print shipping label routine 740, a notify store routine 740, and a check sales module 734. The posting terminal 700 contacts a market maker computer 800 to check sales, to post goods, to de-post goods and to receive mail. The posting terminal 700 is easier to administrate than a consignment node because it behaves like a retail point-of-sale terminal to manage goods that have been posted and are locally sold. The bar code labeling and scanning routines and methods make it easy for the posting terminal user to maintain an accurate account of what goods have been posted, de-posted, sold and/or shipped. The posting terminal may use an MS-DOS or MS-WINDOWS operating system that is much easier for a small store owner to operate and administer than a complex multi-user system like UNIX or WINDOWS NT.
[0065] The posting terminal 700 functionality begins with a user taking a digital picture with the posting terminal digital camera and connecting the digital camera to the camera interface module 701. The user selects an icon on a graphical user interface generated by the posting terminal software to pull the digital pictures from the digital camera. It is understood that other input devices such as scanners and the like may be use in place of the digital camera. The image process module 702 may convert the digital picture to a compressed data format such, as JPEG or MPEG, more suitable for communication of the image across a data link. It is understood that the image may keep it's full resolution for posting. The posting terminal then invokes the record maker routine 704. The record maker routine 704 may display the image or allow the user to select an image from storage unit 710. The record maker may display on a posting terminal display a data entry record with pre-defined text fields, number fields, “buttons,” knobs and other graphical user interface objects to allow a user to enter data to complete a posting record.
[0066] FIG. 13 shows an example of a graphical user interface that may be presented to a posting terminal 700 user. The graphical user interface for the posting terminal 700 may include an image of the item represented by the record 920, a description of the item 922, and 924, the “push button” commands to receive pictures from the digital camera 926, to post a record 928, to clear a local sale 930, to de-post a record 932, to access files of records 934, to view and/or receive and send mail 938, a database category field 940 with a pull down selection bar 942, a database subcategory 944 with a pull down selection bar 946, a code field 948, a posting date field 950, a store identification 951, a market designator field 954, a description field 956, a reserve or wholesale price field 958, and identifier 960, a retail or full price field 962 and identifier 964. The category 940 and sub-category 944 data fields are restricted to selections that can be made by the respective pull down bars 942 and 946. This aids the posting terminal operator in selecting the correct market for the good when creating a record and assures that all records can properly link into a market computer 900 market database. A file may be stored at posting terminal 700 that corresponds to database structure at the market maker computer 800. Having the database structure in a file at posting terminal 700 may allow the posting terminal to receive updates by remote file transfer techniques, such as the KERMIT, FIP, xmodem and ymodem protocols. It is understood that certain selections from the market category 940 and subcategory fields may be “greyed” or that is blocked from selection by a posting terminal 700 user to enforce a franchise and/or license grant that only allows posting in a certain field. This may allow a franchising scheme that restricts a franchisee to a field of use and/or category of goods. The code field 948 displays the bar code data in text form that the market maker computer 900 sends to the posting terminal 700 when a record is successfully posted. Therefore, the code field 948 can serve as a quick visual confirmation to the posting terminal user that the displayed record has been posted. The market field 952 may also be a restricted selection field accessible by pull down selection bar 954. Fields selectable by the market field 952 may include auction, on-sale, hold and the like to give additional directionality to the record posting. The price 964 and reserve price fields 958 may be used to structure the two-tiered market of dealer-to-dealer and retail markets. The reserve price identifier 960 and reserve price field 958 may be hidden from view to retail participants. A dealer may be provided with special logon identifications and passwords to view the reserve price 958 and reserve price indicator 960. This feature encourages franchisees to use the electronic market for collectable goods dealer participant interface to generate local sales.
[0067] The posting terminal 700 user enters descriptions such as the name of the item, the sale price of the item, and a brief description of the item and the like to compose a record. It is understood that a posting terminal user may enter a retail price and a wholesale price. The retail price may then be displayed to participants 900. Other retail participants 902 may receive the wholesale price. It is understood that this two-tiered pricing scheme may be used to network retail store owners to provide additional incentives for the retail participants to use the network to locate goods and generate sales at the retail point of sale. For example, a retailer may charge the retail price for goods to store customers, while obtaining the benefits, e.g. the profit margin of wholesale or discounted pricing for goods. It is understood that the restricted fields are coordinated with the structure of the For-Sale database 814 to guide a posting terminal 700 user in the proper selection of a market category and subcategory of the posting of a good. Categories may include jewelry, rugs and tapestry, tools, quilts, furniture, art deco, books, pens, coins, stamps and costumes and clothing. Subcategories may include painting and drawings, sculpture, vintage clothing, costumes, shoes, bags, hats, wedding gowns, furs, rug types and the like to structure the database. The user may also select from a list box what category and sub-category from restricted fields in which to post a good. Referring back to FIG. 12 , the user may store a composed record on the storage device 710. The record maker routine may also contain a command button 706 to immediately post the record 708. It is understood that the user may designate a time at which the posting terminal 700 may automatically contact the market maker computer 800 and post the selected goods. The post request 716 module may allow a user to select records from storage unit 710 or as in the case where the user selected the immediate post command 708, the post module 712 may accept a record as an input. The ability of the posting terminal 700 to store and select records for posting asynchronously from when a record is created allows a user to compose records when the posting terminal is isolated from communication with a market maker computer 800. The post module 712 may invoke the post request module 716 to post the designated records on the market and make a virtual presentment of a good. Rules and procedures may be imposed on the posting terminal 700 user through licensing and franchise agreements. Such rules may include the requirement that all goods posted must be in the physical and legal possession of the posting terminal franchisee or licensee, that legal possession of a good may be obtained by lawful ownership or through a franchise approved bailment or consignment contract. It is understood that these rules and legal frame work may be imposed to allow the posted record to convey a legal title to a good such that the ownership designated in the record grants lawful ownership to the good designated by the record. The post request module 716 may use a communication package and protocols to transfer the records to the market maker computer 800. Communication libraries are packaged and are commercially available from WCSC 2740 S. Dairy Ashfor, Suite 188, Houston Tex. 77077 and from Marshallsoft Computing, Inc. at P.O. Box 4543 Huntsville, Ala. 35815. The communication protocols such as FTP and KERMIT may be enhanced by using known encryption and authentication techniques to provide an ultra-secure posting interface. The posting record may also include a header that identifies a store identification, user identification, passwords and the like to allow the market maker computer 800 to verify authenticity, approve authorization and track usage of the posting terminal 700 by a particular posting terminal 700 and posting terminal user.
[0068] The market maker computer 800 may verify and accept a record and generate and send a unique bar code number for each record. The bar code number may contain a code that identifies a posting terminal 700. The posting terminal accepts the bar code and places the code in the appropriate record. The unique code generated for each successfully posted record may serve as confirmation that a good has been successfully posted. The record may then be stored on storage unit 722 as a confirmed posted record. When the posting terminals' post request module 716 is finished, the posting terminal 700 or the market maker computer 800 may invoke a mail update routine 720 to pass mail from the market maker computer 800 to the posting terminal 700. Mail topics may include sales information 734, network news 736, and notification of upcoming events 738. The de-post module 724 may use the bar code scanner 730 to receive a posted collectible's identification code. The de-post module 724 may call the de-post request routine 728 to establish communications between the posting terminal 700 and the market maker computer 800. The de-post request module 728 sends the item or collectible bar code to the post/de-post handler 802. The post/de-post handler 802 may remove the collectible identified by the bar code from the for-sale database 814, if the de-posting terminal identification has legal title to the identified collectible as indicated in a for-sale record, the market maker computer 800 may send a de-post confirm code to the posting terminal 700. The posting terminal 700 may process the confirm signal by indicating that the de-posting procedures was performed. If legal title to the posted collectible good does not belong to the de-posting requesting entity, e.g., the de-posting terminal 700 then indicated by the posting terminal identification, the market maker computer 800 may report the collectible good status, e.g., sold!, to the de-post request module 728. This may indicate to the posting terminal user that a bailee relationship now exists between the store and the new legal owner. It is understood that this bailee relationship may be contractually created and enforced through the franchise contract between the posting terminal user and the franchise granting authority. It is also understood that the bailee agreement may be for a predetermined time and/or require the posting terminal user to hold a good for a predetermined time and/or ship the good to a long term storage facility to ease the bailee burden of posting terminal users where a participant elects to hold legal ownership but keep the good available in the electronic market place for the long term. It is understood that a bond and/or insurance requirements may be required for the posting terminal user and/or the long term storage facility to provide assurance to a long term collectible investor that the risk of loss of the collectable good asset is maintained or at least hedged against loss. It is understood that a good may have sold and the new owner has elected to re-sell the good at a higher price. In this instance, the de-posting terminal will be advised that the good has been sold and advised of the new sales price. The posting terminal may then transact the local sale at the new price. After the de-post request module 728 is finished it may invoke or the market maker computer 800 may invoke the get mail routine 720 to send mail between the market maker computer 800 and the posting terminal 700. It is understood that through the procedures of generating a unique code for each posted good, checking a unique code that identifies each posting terminal 700 against the legal owner entry in a posted good on the market maker computer 800 the database of for-sale goods 814 will be extremely reliable and accurate and assure that a locally sold goods that have already been sold on the market maker computer 800 will not be inadvertently sold twice. The procedures, when used in conjunction with the rules and procedures imposed on the posting terminal user through a franchising or licensing legal framework assure that (1) when a record of a good is found on the market maker computer 800 by a participant 900 or another retailer 902, it is in fact for-sale and is in the physical and legal possession of a “trusted” franchise and (2) that when a bona fide purchase price is tendered by a participant 900 or another retailer 902 the legal title to a good as represented by the record will transfer to the buyer with an immediate or nearly immediate finality to the transaction. This frame work of trusted franchisee, high confidence and accurate market database, and the legal finality of transaction, where the legal transaction/“cash” clearing function is performed by the market maker computer, e.g., the participant credit card number or other payment means is only revealed and brokered by the market maker computer 800, is a massive step toward building confidence and trust between a small collectable merchant and participant with electronic transactions. These procedures may be used to give assurances and create trust to participants, who for example would like to buy and art deco collectable from a collectable shop in Russia but is very reluctant to send credit card information to an unknown Russian collectable shop for the obvious concerns of credit card fraud and/or fraud in the bona fides of the collectable good itself. Here, however, the franchising authority polices the franchisees to revoke the franchise if a fraud and/or misrepresentations of the bona fides of a collectable good is taking place by the posting terminal user and the assurance that credit card numbers are only revealed to the market maker computer 800 and not accessible to the, in this example, the Russian collectable store. This allows the Russian collectible store to receive the business good will of the electronic collectible market place of the present invention to establish immediate trust with prospective electronic customers.
[0069] The market maker computer 800 may have mail module 801, a post/de-post handler module 802, a security module 804, database server 806, a database to www map module 808, a www page server 810, a transaction processor 812, a for-sale database 814, a sold database 816, a shipped database 820, and an account database 824. A www to database mapping 808 module is commercially available from Expertelligence, Inc., Santa Barbara, Calif. at (805) 962-2558. Such a mapping module may map a ODBC database such as Microsoft Access to a www page. The market maker computer 800 may serve four primary functions. The first function is the call handler for processing calls from a posting terminals 700. The second function is a database to www mapping function to present participants 900 and other retailers 902 with a means to access the market database. The third function is to provide a means to process transactions from participants by clearing a transaction and transferring legal title to a good. The fourth function is to provide a means for managing the notification of the sale of a good to posting terminals 700.
[0070] The market maker computer 800 may use an accounts 824 database to track payments due to posting terminal 700 users. The clear accounts 825 module may print checks due to posting terminal 700 users. It is understood that electronic funds transfer techniques may be used for clearing account balances 825 for posting terminal users. A modem bank 803 may be used to receive posting calls from posting terminals. It is understood that the modem bank may be replaced by a network connection to the internet. At this juncture it is believed that an off-line, that is a modem bank, connection offers the best security for the posting of goods. However, it is understood that a network connection, e.g. through the internet, is within the scope of the present invention.
[0071] A security module 804 may be used to provide identification and password security. It is understood that other security and authentication techniques may be used at security module 804. It is understood that database server 806 may be an ODBC server available from many commercial database providers. Much of the market maker computers 800 functionality is disclosed above in the consignment node functionality. The databases may be structured to indicate of for-sale 814 database and sold database 816, and auction database 817 and a shipped database 820. It is understood that records may move between the databases by book entry transaction. The transaction processor 812 may use RSA certificates and/or other well-known techniques to process secured transactions between the market maker computer 800 and participants 702 and 902. It is understood that the transaction processor 812 may interface with external payment systems 826. It is understood that participant accounts may be tracked at the market maker computer 800. Moreover, it is understood that account surpluses may be acquired by participants speculating in collectable goods may be invested in highly liquid and safe assets such as U.S. Treasury bills to provide and interest bearing accounting for positive cash balances. This provides an incentive, or at least a hedge against inflation, for a participant to keep funds within the collectible market place and to use these funds to speculate in the collectible market. By using funds available at the market maker computer 800 participants can reduce the transaction costs associated with credit cards and other transaction clearing means and optimize the participants' return on price movements in the buying and selling of collectable goods. It is within the scope of the present invention to allow access to the electronic collectable market through stock brokers, banks, and other transaction providers through these providers private transaction networks, e.g., those networks that use dial in telephone lines to home computers and/or dedicated data lines. It is within the scope of the present invention to allow professional investment advisors to operate funds such as investment companies, mutual fund partnerships and the like, that use collectable goods as part of the funds assets. It is understood that the market “history” may be archived and provided to investment advisors and/or posting terminal users and/or participants on a CD-ROM or other mass storage medium to allow off-line analysis of trends in the collectable goods market. This will allow or create a new class of “learned” speculators in this unique, novel and non-obvious electronic market place and network of trusted franchisees in the collectable goods domain. It is also within the scope to the present invention to create the liquidity, volume and availability analysis to allow the creation of a secondary and derivative market for option and futures contracts and other speculative constructs to be created with the underlying assets as collectable goods in the electronic market place of the present invention.
[0072] Many variations of the present invention are possible once the present invention is known to those skilled in the arts and are within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Those skilled in the arts will be able to make many variations on the present invention once this invention is known to the arts.
Claims
Certificate of Correction present
The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.
I claim:
1. A computer-implemented method for conducting auctions on the Internet, the method comprising:
receiving over a communication network, by a communication handler program executing on a networked market maker computer, information from a remote computer of a first entity corresponding to an item for auction, the information received via the communication network from the remote computer of the first entity including (i) a designation of an item category, selected from a list of item categories presented at the remote computer of the first entity, under which the item for auction is to be listed, and (ii) input relating to scheduling an auction for the item;
processing, by a mapping module at the networked market maker computer, at least a portion of the received information from a database format into a world wide web presentation format, the presentation format including an indication of the selected designation of the category of the item for auction;
based at least in part on the selected category designation and the auction scheduling information previously received from the remote computer of the first entity, automatically initiating an instance of an ascending-bid auction process to conduct an ascending-bid auction for the item over the Internet from the networked market maker computer;
wherein the automatically initiated auction process conducts the auction to completion by performing operations including:
presenting a depiction of the item in the presentation format to a plurality of potential buyers;
receiving at the networked market maker computer one or more bids on the auctioned item from one or more bidders; and
terminating the auction after a predetermined time.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the input relating to the scheduling of an auction for the item is a remote invocation of the auction process at the networked market maker computer by the first entity operation of the remote computer executing a posting terminal program.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the first entity is a consignment node operator wherein the consignment node operator has physical possession of the item for auction and is an authorized seller of the item for auction.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the first entity is a posting terminal user, and wherein the networked market maker computer does not have physical or legal possession of the item for auction.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 wherein the networked market maker computer accepts information corresponding to an item for auction from the remote computer of the first entity over the communication network without verifying that the first entity has physical possession of the item for auction.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 wherein the networked market maker computer accepts information corresponding to an item for auction from the remote computer of the first entity over the communication network without verifying that the first entity has physical or legal possession of the item for auction.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 wherein a central franchising authority detects fraud and revokes a franchise license of the first entity to electronically present items for auction at the networked market maker computer.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the information received from the remote computer of the first entity further includes subjective descriptive information concerning the item for auction within the information transmitted from the remote computer by the first entity and received by the networked market maker computer, and the networked market maker computer presents the subjective descriptive information concerning the item for auction to the potential buyers without further review by a networked market maker computer operator.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 wherein a central franchising authority imposes a quality and performance structure on the first entity and if the first entity fails to meet the imposed quality and performance structure the central franchising authority may revoke a franchise license of the first entity to use the networked market maker computer.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the communication handler program comprises a Unix daemon.
11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction relates to an auction duration.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction relates to one or both of an auction starting time and an auction ending time.
13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction consists of an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
15. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be invoked by the first entity manually.
16. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be initiated at a future time.
17. A computer-implemented method of conducting auctions on the Internet at a networked market maker computer that coordinates via the Internet with a post request module executing at a remote computer operated by a remote entity, the method comprising:
maintaining at a remote computer operated by a remote entity information about an item category structure corresponding to a database structure maintained at a networked market maker computer for storage in a data repository associated with the remote computer operated by the remote entity that is subsequently accessible by a post request module executing on the remote computer operated by the remote entity while the post request module is not in network communication with the networked market maker computer;
receiving over a communication network, by the networked market maker computer an asynchronously created data record from the post request module executing on the remote computer operated by the remote entity, the asynchronously created data record providing an item category selection from the data repository containing information about the category structure of the networked market maker computer, the data record further containing input relating to scheduling an auction for an item, a descriptive name of an item and a brief description of the item from the remote computer operated by the remote entity, the data record being capable of storage at the data repository associated with the remote computer operated by the remote entity for subsequent scheduled or manual transmission to the networked market maker computer over the Internet;
identifying an item to be auctioned;
processing, by a mapping module, at least a portion of the received data record from a database format to a world wide web presentation format corresponding to the item to be auctioned, the presentation format including an indication of the item category selection;
based at least in part on the received item category selection and the data record, automatically initiating an instance of an ascending-bid auction process at the networked market maker computer to conduct an ascending-bid auction for the item over the Internet, the auction process automatically conducting an auction for the item to completion by:
presenting the presentation format to a plurality of Internet participants;
receiving one or more bids for the item from one or more Internet bidder participants; and
terminating the auction upon occurrence of a predetermined condition.
18. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 wherein conducting an auction for the item comprises opening an auction process to participants on the Internet; and further comprising automatically closing the auction process to the Internet participants based on a predetermined condition.
19. The computer-implemented method of claim 18 wherein the predetermined condition is defined at least in part by the received input relating to scheduling an auction for an item.
20. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 further comprising:
verifying and accepting a data record for an item from the post request module and for each successfully posted data record,
generating a unique tracking code for each item.
21. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 further comprising:
approving authorization to access the networked market maker computer by an identification code and a password code in a header of the data record received from the post request module executing on the remote computer operated by the remote entity.
22. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 further comprising:
determining from the data record received from the post request module executing on the remote computer operated by the remote entity whether the item represented by the data record is designated for an auction process or a fixed price offering at the networked market maker computer.
23. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 further comprising:
receiving a de-post request for an item from a de-post request module executing on the remote computer operated by the remote entity; and
determining from a data record for the item maintained by the networked market maker computer whether to remove the item from the auction process at the networked market maker computer in response to the received de-post request from the data record for the item.
24. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction relates to an auction duration.
25. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction relates to one or both of an auction starting time and an auction ending time.
26. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
27. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction consists of an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
28. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be invoked by the remote entity manually.
29. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be initiated at a future time.
30. A computer-implemented system for conducting auctions on the Internet, the system comprising:
information processing means for mapping at least a portion of information corresponding to an item for auction received from a remote computer of a first entity over a communication network from a database format into a world wide web presentation format, the received information including a designation of an item category, selected from a list of item categories presented at the remote computer of the first entity, under which the item for auction is to be listed, and input relating to scheduling an auction for the item;
an auction item presentation means for presenting items for auction in the presentation format to bidding participants connected via the Internet, the auction item presentation means presenting items for auction in the presentation format arranged into item categories, each item for auction being associated with a selected item category designation;
an auction process means for executing an ascending-bid auction process at a networked market maker computer to automatically conduct an ascending-bid auction for an item based at least in part on the selected designation of the category of the item for auction and the scheduling information received from the remote computer of the first entity over the communication network prior to initiation of the auction;
an auction bid recipient means for receiving, during the auction process, at least one bid on an item being presented by the auction item presentation means; and
payment recipient means for receiving payment information from a bidding participant, the payment information corresponding to the item for which the bid was received.
31. The computer-implemented system of claim 30 further comprising payment verification means for passing received payment information to an external payment clearance system for verification.
32. The computer-implemented system of claim 30 further comprising:
a transaction processor to debit an account identified by the payment information if the received bid is approved.
33. The computer-implemented system of claim 32 wherein the payment information identifies a credit card and wherein the transaction processor charges the credit card for the payment associated with the approved bid.
34. The computer-implemented system of claim 30 wherein the received payment information identifies a credit card.
35. The computer-implemented system of claim 30 wherein the auction item presentation means presents the auction item information as a world wide web page.
36. The method computer-implemented system of claim 30 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction relates to an auction duration.
37. The computer-implemented system of claim 30 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction relates to one or both of an auction starting time and an auction ending time.
38. The computer-implemented system of claim 30 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
39. The computer-implemented system of claim 30 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction consists of an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
40. The computer-implemented system of claim 30 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be invoked by the first entity manually.
41. The method computer-implemented system of claim 30 wherein the received input relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be initiated at a future time.
42. A computer-implemented auction system for enabling participation in an online auction conducted over a packet-switched network, the system comprising:
auction item information receiving means for receiving information for creating a data record for each of one or more items available for auction, the received information including information corresponding to one or more items available for auction, specified auction scheduling information for each item available for auction, and a specified designation of an item category with which each item available for auction is associated;
means for placing, in each of the one or more data records, a respective unique identifier to uniquely identify a respective data record for an item available for auction;
auction process means for executing an ascending-bid auction process to automatically conduct an ascending-bid auction for one or more of the one or more items available for auction each based at least in part on the specified designation of an item category for the item available for auction and the specified auction scheduling information for the item available for auction received prior to initiation of an auction for the item available for auction;
auction bid input means for inputting a bid for at least one of the items during an ascending-bid auction for the at least one of the items and for inputting payment information associated with the bid; and
bid processing means for processing payment information of a winning bidder via the packet-switched network and of an account maintained by the computer-implemented auction system.
43. The computer-implemented auction system of claim 42 wherein the payment information identifies a credit card information provided by the winning bidder to pay for an item in the amount of a winning bid for the item.
44. The computer-implemented auction system of claim 42 wherein the received specified auction scheduling information for each item available for auction relates to an auction duration.
45. The computer-implemented auction system of claim 42 wherein the received specified auction scheduling information for each item available for auction relates to one or both of an auction starting time and an auction ending time.
46. The computer-implemented auction system of claim 42 wherein the received specified auction scheduling information for each item available for auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
47. The computer-implemented auction system of claim 42 wherein the received specified auction scheduling information for each item available for auction consists of an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
48. The computer-implemented auction system of claim 42 wherein the received specified auction scheduling information for each item available for auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be invoked manually.
49. The computer-implemented auction system of claim 42 wherein the received specified auction scheduling information for each item available for auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be initiated at a future time.
50. A computer-implemented system for auctioning a uniquely identified item over a packet-switched network, the system comprising:
a database of data records, each data record relating to an item for auction and comprising a unique identifier to uniquely identify a respective data record for the item for auction and an item category under which the item is to be offered for auction, each data record including information specified by and received from a remote computer of a first entity, the specified information including an item category designation and auction scheduling information;
a networked market maker computer accessible by a plurality of participants via the packet-switched network, that based at least in part on the specified category designation and the auction scheduling information received prior to initiation of an auctions automatically maps, by a mapping module, information in a database format to a page of information in a world wide web presentation format for presentation corresponding to an item that is available for auction during a specified time, the page of information including an indication of the item category designation;
wherein the system is configured with computer-executable instructions stored in computer-readable memory that execute an ascending-bid auction process corresponding to the item based at least in part on the scheduling information received from the remote computer of the user, receive bids from one or more of the participants at the networked market maker computer and terminate the auction when one or more predetermined criteria are satisfied; and
wherein the system is configured to transmit to a selected auction participant information about where the selected auction participant should submit payment information for the auctioned item.
51. The computer-implemented system of claim 50 wherein the auction system is configured to reject bids after at least one of the one or more predetermined criteria has been satisfied.
52. The computer-implemented system of claim 50 wherein the system is configured to execute a subroutine to check participant sessions for bids from auction participants connected to the auction system via the Internet using the world wide web.
53. The computer-implemented system of claim 50 wherein the system is configured to execute a subroutine which uses a participant session identification passed to a data structure to correctly identify participants of a particular auction.
54. The computer-implemented system of claim 53 wherein the system is configured to receive payment information identifying a credit card account, and transmit the credit card account information to an external payment clearance system before changing an ownership entry in the data record relating to the item.
55. The computer-implemented system of claim 54 wherein the system is configured to select a bid based on the one or more predetermined criteria, clear the transaction for the amount of the bid, and change an ownership entry in the data record relating to the item to the participant that submitted the selected bid.
56. The computer-implemented system of claim 50 wherein the received auction scheduling information relates to an auction duration.
57. The computer-implemented system of claim 50 wherein the received auction scheduling information relates to one or both of an auction starting time and an auction ending time.
58. The computer-implemented system of claim 50 wherein the received auction scheduling information comprises an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
59. The computer-implemented system of claim 50 wherein the received auction scheduling information consists of an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
60. The computer-implemented system of claim 50 wherein the received auction scheduling information comprises an indication that the auction is to be invoked by the first entity manually.
61. The computer-implemented system of claim 50 wherein the received auction scheduling information comprises an indication that the auction is to be initiated at a future time.
62. The computer-implemented system of claim 50 wherein the at least one or more predetermined criteria is defined at least in part by the received auction scheduling information.
63. A computer-implemented auction participation system, in communication with an auction processor that process bids for items being auctioned, for enabling participation in an online auction over a packet-switched network, the auction participation system comprising:
an auction data recipient means that receives from a first entity via a server at the auction processor data containing information about at least one item being auctioned, the received data including auction scheduling information for each item and a designation of an item category with which each of the at least one item being auctioned is associated, the designation of an item category being specified by a the first entity,
storing means for storing at least a portion of the received data for each item as a respective data record in a database format;
mapping means for mapping at least as portion of the data stored in the respective data record for each item from the database format into a world wide web presentation format;
an auction process stored in computer-readable memory for conducting an Internet-based ascending-bid auction of an item based at least in part on the specified designation of an item category and the auction scheduling information received from the first entity prior to inception of the auction;
presentation means for presenting the ascending-bid auction to a plurality of participants in the world wide web presentation format;
bid input means for enabling a bid from a participant to be submitted to the auction processor via the packet-switched network;
bid award receiving means for receiving an indication that the bid from the participant was accepted; and
payment information input means for enabling the participant to input payment information in response to receiving an indication that the bid from the participant was accepted.
64. The computer-implemented auction participation system of claim 63 wherein the presentation means comprises a web browser system that accesses a server at the auction processor to present the ascending-bid auction to a participant.
65. The computer-implemented auction participation system of claim 63 wherein the auction participation system selects a bid for the item based on one or more predetermined criteria, processes a credit card account for the amount of the bid and changes an ownership entry in the respective data record for the item to the participant that submitted the selected bid.
66. The computer-implemented auction participation system of claim 63 wherein the received auction scheduling information for each item relates to an auction duration.
67. The computer-implemented auction participation system of claim 63 wherein the received auction scheduling information for each item relates to one or both of an auction starting time and an auction ending time.
68. The computer-implemented auction participation system of claim 63 wherein the received auction scheduling information for each item comprises an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
69. The computer-implemented auction participation system of claim 63 wherein the received auction scheduling information for each item consists of an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
70. The computer-implemented auction participation system of claim 63 wherein the received auction scheduling information for each item comprises an indication that the auction is to be invoked manually.
71. The computer-implemented auction participation system of claim 63 wherein the received auction scheduling information for each item comprises an indication that the auction is to be initiated at a future time.
72. A computer-implemented system for facilitating commerce at an Internet-based auction, the system comprising:
a networked market maker computer for receiving over a communication network from one or more remote computers operated by users information regarding an item to be electronically presented for an auction, the received information including auction scheduling information and a user-specified designation of a category, selected from a list of categories presented at a remote computer of a user, under which the item is to be auctioned;
an auction processor including a mapping module at the networked market maker computer for processing information received by the networked market maker computer from a database format to a world wide web presentation format and presenting the processed information in the presentation format to be transmitted to auction participants over a packet-switched network, the format including an indication of the user-specified designation of a category of the item to be auctioned, the auction processor configured for execution of computer-executable instructions stored in computer-readable memory that execute an autonomous ascending-bid auction process for executing an ascending-bid auction for the item based at least in part on the user-specified designation of a category and the auction scheduling information regarding an item received from the remote computer of the user prior to execution of the auction; and
bid receiving means for receiving bids for the item presented to auction participants.
73. The computer-implemented system of claim 72 wherein the received auction scheduling information relates to an auction duration.
74. The method computer-implemented system of claim 72 wherein the received scheduling information relates to one or both of an auction starting time and an auction ending time.
75. The computer-implemented system of claim 72 wherein the received scheduling information comprises an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
76. The computer-implemented system of claim 72 wherein the received scheduling information consists of an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
77. The computer-implemented system of claim 72 wherein the received scheduling information comprises an indication that the auction is to be invoked by the user manually.
78. The computer-implemented system of claim 72 wherein the received scheduling information comprises an indication that the auction is to be initiated at a future time.
79. The computer-implemented system of claim 72 wherein at least one user is a remote consignment node user that created a data record for the item to be auctioned and electronically presented the data record for the item to the networked market maker computer.
80. The computer-implemented system of claim 72 wherein at least one user is a remote posting terminal user that created a data record for the item to be auctioned and electronically presented the data record for the item to the networked market maker computer.
81. The computer-implemented system of claim 72 wherein the system is configured to allow a central franchising authority to police a network of users to impose a performance structure on the network users and to permit the central franchising authority to revoke a franchise license to electronically present items for auction at the networked market maker computer from poor performing or fraudulent users.
82. A computer-implemented method of facilitating Internet auctions, the method comprising:
receiving, from at least one of a plurality of remote computers over a communication network at a computer system programmed to receive information over the communication network, information provided from a first entity and corresponding to an item to be posted for auction including (i) information about the item to be posted for auction, and (ii) information relating to scheduling an auction for the item, the information corresponding to the item to be posted for auction including a specified selection of a predetermined category, the predetermined category selected from a predetermined list of categories maintained by the computer system and presented at least one of the plurality of remote computers;
based on at least a portion of the information corresponding to the item to be posted for auction received from at least one of the plurality of remote computers, generating a unique data record identifier corresponding to a respective data record for the item to be posted for auction by a program executing on the computer system;
placing, in the respective data record for the item to be posted for auction, the unique data record identifier;
notifying at least one of the plurality of remote computers of the unique data record identifier generated in response to receiving information corresponding to the item to be posted for auction;
based at least in part on the specified category selection and the information relating to scheduling an auction received prior to initiation of the auction, autonomously initiating an instance of an ascending-bid auction process to conduct an ascending-bid auction for the item at the computer system by executing an auction process program, the autonomous auction process program indicating the selected category and identifying the item to be auctioned;
presenting the ascending-bid auction to a plurality of auction participants via the communication network in response to a request to display information about the item to be auctioned, the request to display the information about the item to be auctioned being processed by a computer program executing on the computer system; and
receiving at the computer system at least one bid on the item being auctioned, the computer system automatically checking for bids and updating a display of the information about the item in response to receipt of the at least one bid.
83. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the information corresponding to the item to be posted for auction received from the at least one of the plurality of remote computers further comprises an item subcategory, selected from a list of item subcategories, under which the item is to be offered for auction.
84. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the information corresponding to the item to be posted for auction received from the at least one of the remote computers comprises a textual description of the item or a graphical depiction of the item or both.
85. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the information corresponding to the item to be posted for auction received from the at least one of the remote computers comprises a textual description of the item, the textual description including subjective information.
86. The computer-implemented method of claim 85 wherein the subjective information includes one or more of the following: condition of the item being offered for auction, authenticity of the item being offered for auction or special features of the item being offered for auction.
87. The computer-implemented method claim 82 wherein, prior to receiving at the computer system information corresponding to the item to be posted for auction, authorizing an entity to sell items for auction.
88. The computer-implemented method of claim 87 wherein authorizing an entity to sell items for auction comprises receiving identity information from the entity.
89. The computer-implemented method of claim 87 wherein authorizing an entity to sell items for auction comprises identifying financial information for the entity.
90. The computer-implemented method of claim 87 wherein authorizing an entity to sell items for auction comprises identifying a debit/credit account for the entity.
91. The computer-implemented method of claim 90 further comprising debiting the account for the entity by an amount corresponding to a fee.
92. The computer-implemented method of claim 90 further comprising crediting the account for the entity by an amount corresponding to a purchase price of an item sold at auction.
93. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the first entity is a participant who logs into the computer system from a computing platform in order to provide information corresponding to the item to be posted for auction.
94. The computer-implemented method of claim 93 wherein the computing platform comprises a personal computer, a workstation, a cable set-top device, or a video game system.
95. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein an auction participant logs into the computer system from a computing platform in order to browse or bid on items offered for auction.
96. The computer-implemented method of claim 95 wherein the computing platform comprises a personal computer, a workstation, a cable set-top device, or a video game system.
97. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the information corresponding to the item to be posted for auction includes a reserve price for the item to be posted for auction.
98. The computer-implemented method of claim 97 wherein the reserve price is not revealed to auction participants.
99. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein prior to bidding on an item an auction participant browses the predetermined list of categories to search for desired items on which to place bids.
100. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein an item purchased at auction is shipped to a destination specified by a purchasing auction participant.
101. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the information corresponding to the item to be posted for auction includes an indication that the item to be offered for auction is to be advertised to potential bidders.
102. The computer-implemented method of claim 101 wherein an advertisement is displayed in association with a message maintained by the auction computer system.
103. The computer-implemented method of claim 102 wherein the message comprises a welcome message.
104. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 further comprising notifying an auction participant that a bid by that participant has been accepted.
105. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein an auction participant makes electronic payment for an item purchased at auction.
106. The computer-implemented method of claim 105 wherein an auction participant makes electronic payment by providing credit card or debit card information.
107. The computer-implemented method of claim 105 wherein an auction participant makes electronic payment by transferring an accounting for funds from an account maintained for the auction participant and accessible to the computer-implemented auction system.
108. The computer-implemented method of claim 105 wherein an auction participant makes electronic payment using e-money.
109. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the information corresponding to the item to be posted for auction includes a specified time period for the auction.
110. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the auction process program indicates an opening bid for the item offered for auction.
111. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the auction process program indicates a current bid for the item offered for auction.
112. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein presenting the auction to the plurality of auction participants comprises displaying one or more of the following: a textual description of the item offered for auction, a graphical depiction of the item offered for auction, or bid information relating to the item offered for auction.
113. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein presenting the auction to a plurality of auction participants further comprises displaying advertisements to the plurality of participants.
114. The computer-implemented method of claim 113 wherein the displayed advertisements relate to items offered for auction.
115. The computer-implemented method of claim 113 wherein the displayed advertisements relate to an advertisement administered by a central franchising authority.
116. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the computer system updates the display of the information about the item to be auctioned each time a bid higher than the current bid is received.
117. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 further comprising obtaining an auction participant's assent to terms of sale before accepting bids from the auction participant.
118. The computer-implemented method of claim 117 wherein the auction participant's assent is supplied via the Internet.
119. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction relates to an auction duration.
120. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction relates to one or both of an auction starting time and an auction ending time.
121. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
122. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction consists of an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
123. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be invoked manually.
124. The computer-implemented method of claim 82 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction comprises an indication that the auction is to be initiated at a future time.
125. A computer-implemented method of facilitating online electronic auctions, the method comprising:
receiving, at a networked computer programmed to receive information over a communication network, information for each of a plurality of items to be posted for auction provided from at least one of a plurality of first entities, the information for each of the plurality of items to be posted for auction corresponding to a respective item to be auctioned and including (i) information identifying the respective item to be auctioned and designating an item category selected from a list of item categories presented at the networked computer, and (ii) information relating to scheduling an auction for the respective item;
storing at least a portion of the received information in a database of information relating to items to be auctioned;
mapping, by a mapping module, at least a portion of the received information stored in the database from a database format into a world wide web presentation format that includes the information identifying the respective item to be auctioned and the selected item category;
displaying the presentation format to a plurality of potential buyers;
based at least in part on the selected item category and the information relating to scheduling an auction for the respective item received prior to initiation of an auction, autonomously initiating an instance of an ascending-bid auction process to conduct an ascending-bid online auction for the respective item by executing an auction process program, the auction process including presenting the ascending-bid auction to the plurality of potential buyers and receiving bids on the respective item from one or more of the plurality of potential buyers; and
terminating the online auction of the respective item based on a predetermined condition.
126. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 further comprising notifying a winning buyer that a bid submitted by the winning buyer was a winning bid.
127. The computer-implemented method of claim 126 wherein notifying the winning buyer comprises sending the winning buyer an e-mail message.
128. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein the information for each of the plurality of items to be posted for auction corresponding to a respective item to be auctioned includes at least one of an item title and an item description.
129. The computer-implemented method of claim 128 wherein the item description includes an electronic image of the item.
130. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein receiving at the networked computer information for each of the plurality of items to be posted for auction corresponding to a respective item to be auctioned further comprises receiving information designating an item subcategory selected from among a list of item subcategories.
131. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein the predetermined condition based on which the online auction is terminated comprises an occurrence of an auction termination time.
132. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein receiving at the networked computer information for each of the plurality of items to be posted for auction corresponding to a respective item to be auctioned further comprises receiving a reserve price for the respective item to be auctioned.
133. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein the predetermined condition based on which the online auction is terminated comprises an occurrence of the reserve price being met.
134. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 further comprising notifying an entity of an outcome of the online auction.
135. The computer-implemented method of claim 134 wherein notifying an entity comprises sending the entity an e-mail message.
136. The computer-implemented method of claim 135 wherein the entity is notified of a winning buyer's identity.
137. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein receiving at the networked computer information for each of the plurality of items to be Posted for auction corresponding to a respective item to be auctioned further comprises receiving input relating to an advertisement for the item.
138. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the respective item relates to an auction duration.
139. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the respective item relates to one or both of an auction starting time and an auction ending time.
140. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the respective item comprises an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
141. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the respective item consists of an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
142. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the respective item comprises an indication that the auction is to be invoked manually.
143. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the respective item comprises an indication that the auction is to be initiated at a future time.
144. The computer-implemented method of claim 125 wherein the predetermined condition is defined at least in part by the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the respective item.
145. A computer-implemented method of facilitating online electronic auctions, the method comprising:
receiving, at a first computer via the Internet, information provided from at least one of a plurality of remote computers, the at least one remote computer providing information corresponding to an item to be posted for auction including (i) information describing the item to be auctioned, (ii) information for the designation of an item category and an item subcategory selected from an electronically displayed list of item categories and subcategories, and (iii) information relating to scheduling an auction for the item;
storing at least a portion of the received information in a database of information relating to items to be auctioned;
displaying the list of item categories and subcategories via the Internet to a plurality of potential buyers, each potential buyer being able to browse the item categories and subcategories selectively to navigate to or search for a desired item offered for auction; and
for each item to be auctioned computer programming executing from computer-readable memory to: (i) map the information stored in the database relating to the item from a database format into a world wide web presentation format that includes the information describing the item to be auctioned and the selected item category (ii) display the presentation format to a plurality of potential buyers; (iii) based at least in part on the information for the designation of an item category and an item subcategory and the information relating to scheduling an auction for the item received prior to initiation of an auction, conduct an autonomous ascending-bid online auction for the item including presenting the ascending-bid auction to the plurality of potential buyers and receiving bids on the item from one or more of the plurality of potential buyers; and (iv) terminate the online auction of the item based on a predetermined condition.
146. The computer-implemented method of claim 145 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the item relates to an auction duration.
147. The computer-implemented method of claim 145 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the item relates to one or both of an auction starting time and an auction ending time.
148. The computer-implemented method of claim 145 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the item comprises an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
149. The computer-implemented method of claim 145 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the item consists of an indication that the auction is to be started immediately.
150. The computer-implemented method of claim 145 wherein the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the item comprises an indication that the auction is to be invoked manually.
151. The method of claim 145 wherein the received auction scheduling input comprises an indication that the auction is to be initiated at a future time.
152. The computer-implemented method of claim 145 wherein the predetermined condition is defined at least in part by the received information relating to scheduling an auction for the item.
153. A computer-based auction apparatus for facilitating Internet-based auctions where the computer based auction apparatus is under a central franchising authority's control, the auction apparatus comprising:
(a) a first computer system in communication with the Internet and configured to execute a plurality of substantially simultaneous processes;
(b) one or more processes stored in computer-readable memory and executing on the first computer system to perform the following:
(i) receive, over a communication network, from a remote program executing on a remote, independently operated computer system, auction item information including: information describing an item to be offered for auction containing a designation of an item category, selected from a list of item categories, a short title for the item, a textual description of the item, and a digital image of the item, information containing an identification of the entity that is posting the item for auction, and information for scheduling an auction for the item;
(ii) initiate an autonomous ascending-bid auction instance for the item based at least on the information for scheduling an auction for the item received from the remote, independently operated computer system;
(iii) map at least a portion of the received information from a database format into a world wide web presentation format;
(iv) maintain a data structure of participant session identifications for auction participants remotely connected to the auction apparatus via the Internet to correctly identify participants at a particular auction instance;
(v) execute a subroutine to check participant sessions for bids from the auction participants; and
(vi) terminate the autonomous ascending-bid auction instance for the item based on predetermined auction termination criteria.
154. The computer-based auction apparatus of claim 153 wherein the initiated autonomous ascending-bid auction instance comprises an independent auction instance executing substantially simultaneously with a plurality of other autonomous auction instances.
155. The computer-based auction apparatus of claim 153 wherein the remote program executing on the remote, independently operated computer system executes at a remote consignment node associated with a user who created a data record for the item to be auctioned and electronically presented the item to the first computer system.
156. The computer-based auction apparatus of claim 153 wherein the remote program executing on the remote, independently operated computer system is executes at a remote posting terminal associated with a user who created a data record for the item to be auctioned and electronically presented the item to the first computer system.
157. The computer-based auction apparatus of claim 153 wherein a central franchising authority polices a network of users to impose a performance structure on the network users and the central franchising authority revoking a franchise license to electronically present items for auction at the first computer system from poor performing or fraudulent users.
Patent Citations (255)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2321372(A) | 1943-06-01 | Duncan | Examiner |
| US2398677(A) | 1946-04-01 | Stockfeld | Examiner |
| US3573747(A) | 1971-04-01 | Adams et al. | Examiner |
| US3581072(A) | 1971-05-01 | Nymeyer | Examiner |
| US3687256(A) | 1972-08-01 | Jones | Examiner |
| US4063220(A) | 1977-12-01 | Metcalfe et al. | Examiner |
| US4247759(A) | 1981-01-01 | Yuris et al. | Applicant |
| US4270042(A) | 1981-05-01 | Case | Examiner |
| US4274759(A) | 1981-06-01 | Long et al. | Examiner |
| US4305059(A) | 1981-12-01 | Benton | Examiner |
| US4346442(A) | 1982-08-01 | Musmanno | Examiner |
| US4449186(A) | 1984-05-01 | Kelly et al. | Examiner |
| US4553222(A) | 1985-11-01 | Kurland et al. | Examiner |
| US4604693(A) | 1986-08-01 | Chadima et al. | Examiner |
| US4652698(A) | 1987-03-01 | Hale et al. | Examiner |
| US4674044(A) | 1987-06-01 | Kalmus et al. | Examiner |
| US4677552(A) | 1987-06-01 | Sibley, Jr. | Examiner |
| US4689786(A) | 1987-08-01 | Sidhu et al. | Examiner |
| US4734858(A) | 1988-03-01 | Schlafly | Examiner |
| US4739478(A) | 1988-04-01 | Roberts et al. | Examiner |
| US4742457(A) | 1988-05-01 | Leon et al. | Examiner |
| US4751640(A) | 1988-06-01 | Lucas et al. | Examiner |
| US4755940(A) | 1988-07-01 | Brachtl et al. | Examiner |
| US4775935(A) | 1988-10-01 | Yourick | Examiner |
| US4789928(A) | 1988-12-01 | Fujisaki | Examiner |
| US4795890(A) | 1989-01-01 | Goldman | Examiner |
| US4799156(A) | 1989-01-01 | Shavit et al. | Examiner |
| US4812628(A) | 1989-03-01 | Boston et al. | Examiner |
| US4823265(A) | 1989-04-01 | Nelson | Examiner |
| US4864516(A) | 1989-09-01 | Gaither et al. | Examiner |
| US4876648(A) | 1989-10-01 | Lloyd | Examiner |
| US4885685(A) | 1989-12-01 | Wolfberg et al. | Examiner |
| US4887208(A) | 1989-12-01 | Schneider et al. | Examiner |
| US4903201(A) | 1990-02-01 | Wagner | Examiner |
| US4910676(A) | 1990-03-01 | Alldredge | Examiner |
| US4916738(A) | 1990-04-01 | Chandra et al. | Examiner |
| US4922521(A) | 1990-05-01 | Krikke et al. | Examiner |
| US4935870(A) | 1990-06-01 | Burk et al. | Examiner |
| US4947028(A) | 1990-08-01 | Gorog | Examiner |
| US4962449(A) | 1990-10-01 | Schlesinger | Examiner |
| US4972318(A) | 1990-11-01 | Brown et al. | Examiner |
| US4977595(A) | 1990-12-01 | Ohta et al. | Examiner |
| US4982346(A) | 1991-01-01 | Girouard et al. | Examiner |
| US4992940(A) | 1991-02-01 | Dworkin | Examiner |
| US5021953(A) | 1991-06-01 | Webber et al. | Examiner |
| US5038284(A) | 1991-08-01 | Kramer | Examiner |
| US5053957(A) | 1991-10-01 | Suzuki | Examiner |
| US5060153(A) | 1991-10-01 | Nakagawa | Examiner |
| US5063507(A) | 1991-11-01 | Lindsey et al. | Examiner |
| US5077607(A) | 1991-12-01 | Johnson et al. | Examiner |
| US5077665(A) | 1991-12-01 | Silverman et al. | Examiner |
| US5101353(A) | 1992-03-01 | Lupien et al. | Examiner |
| US5105184(A) | 1992-04-01 | Pirani et al. | Examiner |
| US5136501(A) | 1992-08-01 | Silverman et al. | Examiner |
| US5168446(A) | 1992-12-01 | Wiseman | Examiner |
| US5191613(A) | 1993-03-01 | Graziano et al. | Examiner |
| US5193056(A) | 1993-03-01 | Boes | Examiner |
| US5206803(A) | 1993-04-01 | Vitagliano et al. | Examiner |
| US5220501(A) | 1993-06-01 | Lawlor et al. | Examiner |
| US5223699(A) | 1993-06-01 | Flynn et al. | Examiner |
| US5235680(A) | 1993-08-01 | Bijnagte | Examiner |
| US5237500(A) | 1993-08-01 | Perg et al. | Examiner |
| US5239462(A) | 1993-08-01 | Jones et al. | Examiner |
| US5243515(A) | 1993-09-01 | Lee | Examiner |
| US5247575(A) | 1993-09-01 | Sprague et al. | Examiner |
| US5258908(A) | 1993-11-01 | Hartheimer et al. | Examiner |
| US5261070(A) | 1993-11-01 | Ohta | Examiner |
| US5262942(A) | 1993-11-01 | Earle | Examiner |
| US5265006(A) | 1993-11-01 | Asthana et al. | Examiner |
| US5272754(A) | 1993-12-01 | Boerbert | Examiner |
| US5280305(A) | 1994-01-01 | Monroe et al. | Examiner |
| US5280422(A) | 1994-01-01 | Moe et al. | Examiner |
| US5280619(A) | 1994-01-01 | Wang | Examiner |
| US5283731(A) | 1994-02-01 | Lalonde et al. | Examiner |
| US5285383(A) | 1994-02-01 | Lindsey et al. | Examiner |
| US5297031(A) | 1994-03-01 | Gutterman et al. | Examiner |
| US5297032(A) | 1994-03-01 | Trojan et al. | Examiner |
| US5305195(A) | 1994-04-01 | Murphy | Examiner |
| US5305200(A) | 1994-04-01 | Hartheimer et al. | Examiner |
| US5313637(A) | 1994-05-01 | Rose | Examiner |
| US5319542(A) | 1994-06-01 | King, Jr. et al. | Examiner |
| US5323315(A) | 1994-06-01 | Highbloom | Examiner |
| US5325297(A) | 1994-06-01 | Bird et al. | Examiner |
| US5329589(A) | 1994-07-01 | Fraser et al. | Examiner |
| US5334822(A) | 1994-08-01 | Sanford | Examiner |
| US5335170(A) | 1994-08-01 | Petteruti et al. | Examiner |
| US5336870(A) | 1994-08-01 | Hughes et al. | Examiner |
| US5341429(A) | 1994-08-01 | Stringer et al. | Examiner |
| US5345091(A) | 1994-09-01 | Craig et al. | Examiner |
| US5347306(A) | 1994-09-01 | Nitta | Examiner |
| US5347632(A) | 1994-09-01 | Filepp et al. | Examiner |
| US5351186(A) | 1994-09-01 | Bullock et al. | Examiner |
| US5351293(A) | 1994-09-01 | Michener et al. | Examiner |
| US5375055(A) | 1994-12-01 | Togher et al. | Examiner |
| US5383113(A) | 1995-01-01 | Kight et al. | Examiner |
| US5394324(A) | 1995-02-01 | Clearwater | Examiner |
| US5402336(A) | 1995-03-01 | Spiegelhoff et al. | Examiner |
| US5402490(A) | 1995-03-01 | Mihm, Jr. | Examiner |
| US5414833(A) | 1995-05-01 | Hershey et al. | Examiner |
| US5424944(A) | 1995-06-01 | Kelly et al. | Examiner |
| US5426281(A) | 1995-06-01 | Abecassis | Examiner |
| US5428778(A) | 1995-06-01 | Brookes | Examiner |
| US5444850(A) | 1995-08-01 | Chang | Examiner |
| US5448625(A) | 1995-09-01 | Lederman | Examiner |
| US5451998(A) | 1995-09-01 | Hamrick | Examiner |
| US5453926(A) | 1995-09-01 | Stroschin et al. | Examiner |
| US5465291(A) | 1995-11-01 | Barrus et al. | Examiner |
| US5475756(A) | 1995-12-01 | Merritt | Examiner |
| US5485510(A) | 1996-01-01 | Colbert | Examiner |
| US5506961(A) | 1996-04-01 | Carlson et al. | Examiner |
| US5521815(A) | 1996-05-01 | Rose, Jr. | Examiner |
| US5526479(A) | 1996-06-01 | Barstow et al. | Examiner |
| US5548721(A) | 1996-08-01 | Denslow | Examiner |
| US5553145(A) | 1996-09-01 | Micali | Examiner |
| US5557518(A) | 1996-09-01 | Rosen | Examiner |
| US5557728(A) | 1996-09-01 | Garrett et al. | Examiner |
| US5561707(A) | 1996-10-01 | Katz | Examiner |
| US5570291(A) | 1996-10-01 | Dudle et al. | Examiner |
| US5584025(A) | 1996-12-01 | Keithley et al. | Examiner |
| US5590197(A) | 1996-12-01 | Chen et al. | Examiner |
| US5592375(A) | 1997-01-01 | Salmon et al. | Examiner |
| US5594732(A) | 1997-01-01 | Bell et al. | Examiner |
| US5598536(A) | 1997-01-01 | Slaughter et al. | Examiner |
| US5598557(A) | 1997-01-01 | Doner et al. | Examiner |
| US5611051(A) | 1997-03-01 | Pirelli | Examiner |
| US5625818(A) | 1997-04-01 | Zarmer et al. | Examiner |
| US5625823(A) | 1997-04-01 | Debenedictis et al. | Examiner |
| US5629982(A) | 1997-05-01 | Micali | Examiner |
| US5630125(A) | 1997-05-01 | Zellweger | Examiner |
| US5657389(A) | 1997-08-01 | Houvener | Examiner |
| US5664110(A) | 1997-09-01 | Green et al. | Examiner |
| US5664111(A) | 1997-09-01 | Nahan et al. | Examiner |
| US5664115(A) | 1997-09-01 | Fraser | Examiner |
| US5666493(A) | 1997-09-01 | Wojcik et al. | Examiner |
| US5675784(A) | 1997-10-01 | Maxwell et al. | Examiner |
| US5689652(A) | 1997-11-01 | Lupien et al. | Examiner |
| US5694546(A) | 1997-12-01 | Reisman | Examiner |
| US5694551(A) | 1997-12-01 | Doyle et al. | Examiner |
| US5696965(A) | 1997-12-01 | Dedrick | Examiner |
| US5706457(A) | 1998-01-01 | Dwyer et al. | Examiner |
| US5708780(A) | 1998-01-01 | Levergood et al. | Examiner |
| US5710887(A) | 1998-01-01 | Chelliah et al. | Examiner |
| US5710889(A) | 1998-01-01 | Clark et al. | Examiner |
| US5715314(A) | 1998-02-01 | Payne et al. | Examiner |
| US5717989(A) | 1998-02-01 | Tozzoli et al. | Examiner |
| US5721780(A) | 1998-02-01 | Ensor et al. | Examiner |
| US5724424(A) | 1998-03-01 | Gifford | Examiner |
| US5724521(A) | 1998-03-01 | Dedrick | Examiner |
| US5727165(A) | 1998-03-01 | Ordish et al. | Examiner |
| US5732400(A) | 1998-03-01 | Mandler et al. | Examiner |
| US5745882(A) | 1998-04-01 | Bixler et al. | Examiner |
| US5752238(A) | 1998-05-01 | Dedrick | Examiner |
| US5757924(A) | 1998-05-01 | Friedman et al. | Examiner |
| US5758328(A) | 1998-05-01 | Giovannoli | Examiner |
| US5765141(A) | 1998-06-01 | Spector | Examiner |
| US5771291(A) | 1998-06-01 | Newton et al. | Examiner |
| US5771354(A) | 1998-06-01 | Crawford | Examiner |
| US5771380(A) | 1998-06-01 | Tanaka et al. | Examiner |
| US5774553(A) | 1998-06-01 | Rosen | Examiner |
| US5774873(A) | 1998-06-01 | Berent et al. | Examiner |
| US5778367(A) | 1998-07-01 | Wesinger et al. | Examiner |
| US5793301(A) | 1998-08-01 | Patterson et al. | Examiner |
| US5794207(A) | 1998-08-01 | Walker et al. | Examiner |
| US5794210(A) | 1998-08-01 | Goldhaber et al. | Examiner |
| US5794219(A) | 1998-08-01 | Brown | Examiner |
| US5799285(A) | 1998-08-01 | Klingman | Examiner |
| US5803500(A) | 1998-09-01 | Mossberg | Examiner |
| US5809144(A) | 1998-09-01 | Sirbu et al. | Examiner |
| US5812776(A) | 1998-09-01 | Gifford | Examiner |
| US5812819(A) | 1998-09-01 | Rodwin et al. | Examiner |
| US5818914(A) | 1998-10-01 | Fujisaki | Examiner |
| US5819092(A) | 1998-10-01 | Ferguson et al. | Examiner |
| US5826241(A) | 1998-10-01 | Stein et al. | Examiner |
| US5826244(A) | 1998-10-01 | Huberman | Examiner |
| US5832459(A) | 1998-11-01 | Cameron et al. | Examiner |
| US5835896(A) | 1998-11-01 | Fisher et al. | Examiner |
| US5838906(A) | 1998-11-01 | Doyle et al. | Examiner |
| US5842040(A) | 1998-11-01 | Hughes et al. | Examiner |
| US5845265(A) | 1998-12-01 | Woolston | Examiner |
| US5845266(A) | 1998-12-01 | Lupien et al. | Examiner |
| US5850442(A) | 1998-12-01 | Muftic | Examiner |
| US5855008(A) | 1998-12-01 | Goldhaber et al. | Examiner |
| US5864823(A) | 1999-01-01 | Levitan | Examiner |
| US5870552(A) | 1999-02-01 | Dozier et al. | Examiner |
| US5870717(A) | 1999-02-01 | Wiecha | Examiner |
| US5872848(A) | 1999-02-01 | Romney et al. | Examiner |
| US5873069(A) | 1999-02-01 | Reuhl et al. | Examiner |
| US5873071(A) | 1999-02-01 | Ferstenberg et al. | Examiner |
| US5878400(A) | 1999-03-01 | Carter, III | Examiner |
| US5878423(A) | 1999-03-01 | Anderson et al. | Examiner |
| US5884056(A) | 1999-03-01 | Steele | Examiner |
| US5890138(A) | 1999-03-01 | Godin et al. | Examiner |
| US5896379(A) | 1999-04-01 | Haber | Examiner |
| US5903647(A) | 1999-05-01 | Ronning | Examiner |
| US5905974(A) | 1999-05-01 | Fraser et al. | Examiner |
| US5905975(A) | 1999-05-01 | Ausubel | Examiner |
| US5909492(A) | 1999-06-01 | Payne et al. | Examiner |
| US5913040(A) | 1999-06-01 | Rakavy et al. | Examiner |
| US5915209(A) | 1999-06-01 | Lawrence | Examiner |
| US5922074(A) | 1999-07-01 | Richard et al. | Examiner |
| US5926794(A) | 1999-07-01 | Fethe | Examiner |
| US5933813(A) | 1999-08-01 | Teicher et al. | Examiner |
| US5946467(A) | 1999-08-01 | Pathakis et al. | Examiner |
| US5966699(A) | 1999-10-01 | Zandi | Examiner |
| US5987425(A) | 1999-11-01 | Hartman et al. | Examiner |
| US5991739(A) | 1999-11-01 | Cupps et al. | Examiner |
| US5999915(A) | 1999-12-01 | Nahan et al. | Examiner |
| US6006201(A) | 1999-12-01 | Berent et al. | Examiner |
| US6026368(A) | 2000-02-01 | Brown et al. | Examiner |
| US6029141(A) | 2000-02-01 | Bezos et al. | Examiner |
| US6049785(A) | 2000-04-01 | Gifford | Examiner |
| US6055514(A) | 2000-04-01 | Wren | Examiner |
| US6055516(A) | 2000-04-01 | Johnson et al. | Examiner |
| US6055573(A) | 2000-04-01 | Gardenswartz et al. | Examiner |
| US6061660(A) | 2000-05-01 | Eggleston et al. | Examiner |
| US6085176(A) | 2000-07-01 | Woolston | Examiner |
| US6108639(A) | 2000-08-01 | Walker et al. | Examiner |
| US6138107(A) | 2000-10-01 | Elgamal | Examiner |
| US6151589(A) | 2000-11-01 | Aggarwal et al. | Examiner |
| US6167386(A) | 2000-12-01 | Brown | Examiner |
| US6185683(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Ginter et al. | Examiner |
| US6195649(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Gifford | Examiner |
| US6199051(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Gifford | Examiner |
| US6202051(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Woolston | Examiner |
| US6205432(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Gabbard et al. | Examiner |
| US6205437(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Gifford | Examiner |
| US6212634(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Geer et al. | Examiner |
| US6259699(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Opalka et al. | Examiner |
| US6266651(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Woolston | Examiner |
| US6272474(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Garcia | Examiner |
| US6279112(B1) | 2001-08-01 | O'Toole et al. | Examiner |
| US6282516(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Giuliani | Examiner |
| US6292786(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Deaton et al. | Examiner |
| US6323894(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Katz | Examiner |
| US6336105(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Conklin et al. | Examiner |
| US6336138(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Caswell et al. | Examiner |
| US6337937(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Takushima et al. | Examiner |
| US6397212(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Biffar | Examiner |
| US6415270(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Rackson et al. | Examiner |
| US6427132(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Bowman-Amuah | Examiner |
| US6432451(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Lee et al. | Examiner |
| US6449599(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Payne et al. | Examiner |
| US6490358(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Geer et al. | Examiner |
| US7103568(B1) | 2006-09-01 | Fusz et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0095379(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Likourezos et al. | Examiner |
| US2003/0046186(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Wren | Examiner |
| FR2658635 | 1991-08-01 | Applicant | |
| NL9300266 | 1994-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO9215174 | 1992-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO97/37315 | 1995-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO9634356 | 1996-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO99/06913 | 1997-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/08578 | 1998-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/17797 | 1998-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/66231 | 1999-04-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (720)
- Wright et al., “Is it Time to Travel the Auction Route?” Real Estate Today, v.24, n.6, p. 46(5), Jul. 1991.Examiner
- Cummings, “Stealing the Real Estate Spotlight”, Business Journal of New Jersey, v. 3, n. 6, p. 37, 1986.Examiner
- Banatre et al., “The Design and Building of Enchere, A Distributed Electronic Marketing System”, Communications of the ACM v. 29, n. 1, Jan. 1986.Examiner
- Borman et al., “Electronic Agricultural Auctions in the United Kingdom”, Electronic Markets Newsletter of the Competence Centre Electronic Markets—University of St. Gallen—Institute for Information Management, No. 9/10, Oct. 1993, p. 27-28.Examiner
- No Author listed, “Terrific Computer Hardware & Software Bargains Benefit WGBH Channel 2”, on DELPHI/Boston New for Feb. 1987.Examiner
- DuBois, Peter, “Better Impression: Art Market Continues to Show Recovery Signs”, Barron's National Business and Financial Weekly, v. 72, No. 20, pp. 18 (1992).Examiner
- Nov. 7, 2001, defendant eBay et al. Answer to MercExchange's Complaint, alleging affirmative defenses of invalidity based on 35 U.S.C. § 102 (anticipation) and § 103 (obviousness).Examiner
- Aug. 30, 2002, eBay's Second Supplemental Response to MercExchange's Interrogatories providing additional alleged “prior art” upon which it would rely at trial to support its invalidity defenses under §§ 102 and 103.Examiner
- Mar. 21, 2003, eBay's supplemental Section 282 statement citing additional alleged “prior art.” Again, this disclosure included the following documents: (1) the Gifford Patent; (2) the Lindsey Patent; (3) the Lalonde Patent; (4) the Kelly Patent; (5) the Nahan Patent; (6) a Fortune magazine article by Kupfer entitled “Software ‘Agents’ Will Make Life Easier” (the “Kupfer article”); (7) the Keller summary; (8) the Spiegelhoff Patent; (9) a videotape produced by Honicorp, Inc., and narrated by Edwin Newman (the “Honicorp video”); and (10) the transcript to a Today Show segment with Kenneth Nahan, a named inventor of the Nahan Patent.Examiner
- Jury Verdict of validity and infringement of 41 claims of the '265 and '176 Patents.Examiner
- Mar. 31, 2004, MercExchange response to eBay's Appeal Brief (corrected brief).Examiner
- http://search.sothebys.com/about/corporate/as.corphistory.html.Examiner
- Acorn Collectors Service Network advertisement.Examiner
- Coin Trading to Begin on Acorn Network, Coin World (Jun. 4, 1986).Examiner
- http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/d/daemon.html.Examiner
- http://computer.howstuffworks.com/router.htm/printable.Examiner
- The Compulatelist (Jan. 1993), vol. 4, No. 1.Examiner
- Lucianovic, Stamp Auction Via Internet?, rec.collecting.stamps (Apr. 21, 1995).Examiner
- Traub, MTG: All Editions Rare and Uncommon Auction, rec.games.deckmaster (May 9, 1994).Examiner
- Traub, M:tG Auction (winding down)—Updated No. 77, rec.games.deckmaster (Jan. 24, 1995).Examiner
- Lehman, Lego Sale: Auczilla is here, rec.toys.lego (Feb. 26, 1995.Examiner
- Yin, 2 Dark Boxes for auction on WWW., rec.games.trading-cards.marketplace (May 29, 1995).Examiner
- http://money.howstuffworks.com/credit-card.htm/printable.Examiner
- Examiner's Answer, U.S. Appl. No. 08/427,820, Jul. 19, 1999.Examiner
- Office Action Summary, U.S. Appl. No. 09/253,014, Dec. 8, 2000.Examiner
- Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 09/253,014, Feb. 2, 2001.Examiner
- Examiner Interview Summary Record, U.S. Appl. No. 09/253,014, Jan. 23, 2001.Examiner
- Decision on Appeal, U.S. Appl. No. 09/253,014, Feb. 4, 2004.Examiner
- Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 09/253,021, Jul. 28, 2000.Examiner
- Order and Opinion, MercExchange LLC v. eBay, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, Oct. 21, 2002.Examiner
- Patent Application “Consignment Nodes”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/427,820, Apr. 26, 1995.Examiner
- Patent Application “Consignment Nodes”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/554,704, Nov. 7, 1995.Examiner
- “Consignment Nodes” (red-line).Examiner
- Order and Opinion, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., civil Action No. 2:01cv736, Oct. 18, 2002.Examiner
- Order and Opinion, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, Jan. 13, 2003.Examiner
- Order and Opinion, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, Apr. 3, 2003.Examiner
- Orders Granting Reexamination of (1) U.S. Patent No. 6,085,176 and (2) U.S. Patent No. 5,845,265; PAIR printout for U.S. Patent 6,202,051.Examiner
- Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/253,021, Jun. 7, 2000.Examiner
- Preliminary Amendment, “Method and Apparatus for Facilitating Internet Commerce Through Internetworked Markets and Auctions”, Feb. 19, 1999.Examiner
- Examiner Interview Summary Record, Jul. 26, 2000.Examiner
- Decision on Appeal, U.S. Appl. No. 08/427,820, Sep. 29, 2003.Examiner
- Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/166,779, Jul. 5, 2000.Examiner
- Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/166,779, Jun. 15, 2001.Examiner
- Bazeley, “UBid marketing itself as legally safer than eBay”, Mercury News, Jun. 12, 2004.Examiner
- Order and Opinion, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, Aug. 6, 2003.Examiner
- Kupfer, Software ‘Agents’ Will Make Life Easy, Fortune, Jan. 24, 1994, pp. 72-73.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 18B, pp. 3167-3234, May 16, 2003.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv36, vol. 7B, pp. 1311-1416, May 1, 2003.Examiner
- Lewis, Gallery-Hopping—and Shopping—via PCT, Bits & Bytes, Business Week, Dec. 5, 1994, No. 3401, p. 1.Examiner
- Electronic Market Newsletter, Oct. 1993, No. 9/10, pp. 1-36.Examiner
- Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 08/554,704, Dec. 12, 1997.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 13A, pp. 2326-2436, May 9, 2003.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 16A, pp. 2878-2972, May 14, 2003.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 2B, pp. 300-428, Apr. 24, 2003.Examiner
- Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/264,573, Aug. 3, 1999.Examiner
- Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 09/264,573, Sep. 14, 1999.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 2A, pp. 214-299, Apr. 24, 2003.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 3A, pp. 428-529, Apr. 25, 2003.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 4A, pp. 620-745, Apr. 28, 2003.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 5A, pp. 863-965, Apr. 29, 2003.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 15B, pp. 2779-2877, May 13, 2003.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 19A, pp. 3235-3339, May 19, 2003.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 19B, pp. 3340-3435, May 19, 2003.Examiner
- Trial Proceedings, MercExchange, LLC v. eBay, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:01cv736, vol. 21A, pp. 3487-3569, May 21, 2003.Examiner
- Appellant's Brief under 37 CFR 1.192, U.S. Appl. No. 08/427,820, Mar. 12, 1999.Examiner
- Borland's Paradox for Windows User's Guide, Borland International, Inc., 1994.Examiner
- “Wholesale Showroom Opens to Public”, Miami Herald; Final Section: Home & Design, p. 6H, Oct. 21, 1984.Examiner
- Cummings, Stealing the Real Estate Spotlight, Business Journal of New Jersey, vol. 3, No. 6, p. 37.Examiner
- Borman et al., Electronic Agricultural Auctions in the United Kingdom, Electronic Markets Newsletter of the Competence Centre Electronic Markets—University of St. Gallen—Institute for Information Management, No. 9/10, pp. 27-28 (Oct. 1993).Examiner
- Terrific Computer Hardware & Software Bargains Benefit WGBH Channel 2, on Delphi/Boston, New for Feb. 1987.Examiner
- DuBois, Better Impression: Art Market Continues to Show Recovery Signs, Barron's National Business and Financial Weekly, v. 72, No. 20, pp. 18 (1992).Examiner
- Protest Under 37 CFR § 1.291(a), U.S. Appl. No. 09/253,014, filed Jun. 18, 2004.Examiner
- “[ADS for Antique Shows],” The Inside Collector, Oct. 1992, vol. 3, No. 2.Examiner
- “Active Message Processing Messages as Messengers,” (Illegible) Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Report CSR9035 August.Examiner
- “Ameritech Library Services Unveils Webpac at ALA,” PR Newswire, Jun. 27, 1995.Examiner
- “Anonymous Delivery of Goods in Electric Commerce,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Mar. 1996, vol. 39, No. 3, p. 363-364.Examiner
- “Anonymous Delivery of Goods in Electronic Commerce (Continued),” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Mar. 1996, vol. 39, No. 3, p. 365-366.Examiner
- “AT&T PersonaLink Services to Use Intelligent Network Assistants,” AT&T, Jan. 6, 1994.Examiner
- “Bank Card Originated Messages—Interchange Message Specifications—Content for Financial Transaction,” International Standard, 1987.Examiner
- “Big Players Team Up To Provide Affordable Web Security Standards,” Electronic Marketplace Report, Apr. 18, 1995, vol. 9, No. 5, Simba Information, Inc.Examiner
- “BookIt!,” Web Ventures 1996, http://www.webventures.com.Examiner
- “BookIt!,” Web Ventures, Datalex Communications USA, Inc., Web Ventures, 1999, http://www.webventures.com.Examiner
- “Cashing in on Cyberspace Tribune's Big Stake in Interactive,” NewsInc, Nov. 27, 1995, vol. 7, No. 23.Examiner
- “Central Motor Auction in Strategic Alliance with MITAC: 2,” Extel Examiner, Oct. 28, 1994.Examiner
- “Checkfree Corp and Internet Provider Go For Secure Access,” Information Access Company, Feb. 1, 1995, Gralla Publications, U.S.Examiner
- “Chicago Firm Offers Internet Brokerage Services,” Simba Information, Inc., Media Daily, Dec. 21, 1994, Section No. 342, vol. 2.Examiner
- “Cig Search BOTS,” Jan. 27, 2002.Examiner
- “Competition in the Dutch Flower Markets,” Nov. 6, 2001.Examiner
- “CompuServe's Big Push Will Impact Online Commerce,” Electronic Information Report, Aug. 8, 1995, vol. 9, No. 15, Simba Information, Inc.Examiner
- “Computer museum holds an internet auction,” CMP 2000; May 9, 1994.Examiner
- “EIT computer museum: first-ever internet auction produces results for the computer museum.” Business Wire, Apr. 28, 1994.Examiner
- Sharp, Amy, “From army knives to gold coins, collectors attend ‘on-line’ auctions,” Memphis Business Journal v. 8(10) s1, p. 10, Jul. 28, 1986.Examiner
- “Go for the green—country club members scrambling to buy PGA west, mission hills courses at auction.” Los Angeles Times Home Edition, col. D1, p. 3, Jun. 30, 1993.Examiner
- “Interchange Message Specification for Debit and Credit Card Message Exchange Among Financial Institutions,” American National Standard, May 16, 1988, American Bankers Association.Examiner
- “Intermart Architecture and Design”, Intermart, May 1, 1995, p. 1-10, California.Examiner
- “Intermart Database Schemas,” Intermart, Feb. 7, 1995, vol. 5, p. 1-13.Examiner
- “Internet-Based Investor Service Completes Trials; Adds Mutual Funds to Investment Offerings,” PR Newswire Association, Inc., Jan. 17, 1995, Section: Financial News, Chicago.Examiner
- “Network General Buy Propels McAfee Into Top 10,” Software Industry Report, Oct. 20, 1997, vol. 29, No. 20.Examiner
- “New Issues—Checkfree: New and Noteworthy,” Emerging and Special Situations, Sep. 18, 1995, vol. 15, No. 9, McGraw-Hill Publishing.Examiner
- “New Service Enables Internet Users to Directly Buy, Sell and Manage Investments,” PR Newswire Association, Inc., Dec. 21, 1994, Section: Financial News.Examiner
- “Online Marketplace '95—Marketing & Transactions Apr. 19, 1995,” Newsbytes News Network, Apr. 19, 1995, Chicago, IL.Examiner
- “Part II: Information Companies Invest to Gain Competitive Edge,” Electronic Information Report, Feb. 28, 1997, vol. 18, No. 8.Examiner
- “PAWWS to Announce New Portfolio Management Challenge, On-Line,” M2 Communications, Ltd., Oct. 11, 1994.Examiner
- “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jan. 1995, vol. 38, No. 1, p. 83-84.Examiner
- “Prodigy outlines Internet Plans, Launches Services Sep. 24, 1994,” Newsbytes News Network, Sep. 29, 1994.Examiner
- “Security Top Issue for Banks Planning to Surf the Internet,” Financial Services Report, Apr. 12, 1995, vol. 12, Issue 8.Examiner
- “Spry's Air Mosaic Express Provides Internet Access to World Wide Web,” The PC Netter, Dec. 1, 1994, vol. 9, No. 12.Examiner
- “The MD5 Message Digest Algorithm,” Network Working Group, Apr. 1, 1992, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science and RSA Data Security, Inc.Examiner
- “Tribune Co. Emerges as Big Interactive Services Player,” Electronic Information Report, Oct. 6, 1995 , vol. 16, No. 43, Simba Information, Inc.Examiner
- “Tribune Co. Seeks Next-Generation Media,” Venture Capital Journal, Aug. 1, 1995.Examiner
- “Tribune Takes Papers Online, Cautiously,” Interactive Content, Feb. 1, 1995.Examiner
- “A Quick Guide to Last Minute Weekend Entertainment,” Chicago Sum Times-News-48 hours, Apr. 16, 1994.Examiner
- “A Quick Tour: A Summary of Approaches,” EDventure Holdings, Inc., Jan. 24, 1995, vol. 95, No. 1, ISSN:1047-935X.Examiner
- “AOL Members Even Better Than They Look,” Newsbytes News Network, Jan. 28, 1994.Examiner
- “Aucnet USA to Use GM Hughes Satellite for Auto Auctions,” Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Feb. 9, 1994.Examiner
- “Aucnet: TV Auction Network System,” Harvard Business School, Apr. 12, 1996.Examiner
- “Breakaway Companies Part II,” Electronic Information Report, Apr. 28, 1995, vol. 16, No. 16., Simba Information, Inc.Examiner
- “Buy and Sell Stocks on the Internet,” DOT.com Marketing Section, Jan. 1995, Business Communications Com., vol. 1, No. 10.Examiner
- “Checkfree Announces New Electronic Payments Agreements,” Corporate EFT Report, Dec. 28, 1994.Examiner
- “CommerceNet Security Details?” University of Illinois at Urbana, May 25, 1994.Examiner
- “Company Presentations (Innovators—Includes Related Article on Network Topologies),” EDventure Holdings, Inc., Feb. 23, 1995, vol. 95, No. 2, ISSN:1047-935X.Examiner
- “Cybercash as a Virtual Smart Car Internet,” Electronic Payments International, Aug. 1, 1995.Examiner
- “Downtown Anywhere Visitors Center,” Downtown Anywhere Inc., Mar. 12, 2002.Examiner
- “EFT Issues: EFT Heads Down a New Payments Path,” Bank Network News, Sep. 25, 1994, Faulkner & Gray Inc., ISSN: 1063-4428.Examiner
- “Electronic Shopping War Heats Up,” Coporate EFT Report, Nov. 16, 1994, vol. 14, Issue 22.Examiner
- “FCC Will Allow Remote Electronic Bidding in October 26 Narrowband PCS Auction,” Common Carrier Week, Oct. 10, 1994.Examiner
- “Financial Institution Retail Message Authentication,” American National Standard X9-19, Aug. 13, 1986, American Bankers Association.Examiner
- “Google Search RE: Weekly Product Search—Webpac Link to Notis LMC,” Ameritech Library Services News, Sep. 8, 1995.Examiner
- “Helpful Hints for Using freeWAIS with Multiple Search Gateway,” Aug. 29, 1994.Examiner
- “IEM Prospectus: 1994 Virginia Senate Race [General Election (Candidates) Market] Vote Share Market,” Iowa Electronic Markets, Jun. 8, 2002.Examiner
- “IEM Prospectus: 1994 Virginia Senate Race Winner-Takes-All Market,” Iowa Electronic Markets, Jun. 8, 2002.Examiner
- “Internet Marketing Discussion List—Find the Best Book Price Fast,” Archives of the Internet Marketing Discussion List, Jan. 24, 2002.Examiner
- “Japan Business Television Launches International Operations,” PR Newswire, Oct. 27, 1994.Examiner
- “Japan's Largest Commercial Video Selects Spar Satellite Transmission Equipment,” Canadian News Wire, May 10, 1994.Examiner
- “Joint Conference on Information Superhighway and You,” Chinese Information and Networking Association, Aug. 29, 1994.Examiner
- “MCI Selects Netscape Communications Secure Software for New Internet-MCI Service,” Netscape Communications News Release, Nov. 21, 1994.Examiner
- “MUDA Manual and Diskette Mailing List,” Dec. 28, 1992.Examiner
- “MUDA Manual and Diskette Mailing List,” Sep. 1991.Examiner
- “New MUDA Manual (SSWP 783) and Diskette Mailing List,” Dec. 1991.Examiner
- “Newsgroup Posting RE: Usenet Software: History and Sources,” Jun. 8, 2002.Examiner
- “Onsale Joins Fray as Online Shopping Picks Up Speed: Internet Booms,” Computer Reseller News, Jun. 5, 1995, ISSN:0893-8377, p. 73.Examiner
- “Outsourcing Taps On-line Goldmine,” Computer World Inc., Jun. 5, 1995, p. 20.Examiner
- “Paying Bills Electronically”.Examiner
- “Proforma,” Half.Com Proforma Quarterly Income Statement.Examiner
- “Search Commercial on the Internet a Survey of Searching Tools on the Internet,” Jan. 27, 2002.Examiner
- “SNPP a Simple Network Payment Protocol (Illegible)”.Examiner
- “Stanley Gibbons Auctions—Welcome to the SG World of Auctions,” Jan. 24, 2002.Examiner
- “The Computer Museum Holds First Real-Time Charity Auctions on the World Wide Web,” Business Wire, May 8, 1995.Examiner
- “The Summer Conferences: Issues and Answers, Products and Services are SLA and ALA,” Information Today, Jul. 17, 1995, vol. 12, No. 7.Examiner
- “USA Commercenet Urges Government to Ease Export Restrictions on Encryption,” Business Wire, Jun. 26, 1995.Examiner
- “The Evolution of TELCOT the Foundation of ‘The Seam’,” TELCOT Plains Cotton Cooperative Association, 1997.Examiner
- Abadi, M. et al., “Authentication and Delegation With Smart-Cards,” System Research Center, Oct. 22, 1990.Examiner
- Academic Consulting Services, “RN Newsreader Software,” available at http://www.academ.com\academ\m.html, May 18, 1998.Examiner
- Adams, R., “Newsgroup Posting RE: Hiring Webmasters and HTML Writers,” Oct. 6, 1994.Examiner
- Akerlof, G. et al., “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 13, 2002, vol. 84, Issue 3, pp. 488-500.Examiner
- Anand, et al., “The Electronic Flea Market,” Research Report, IBM Research Division, T.J. Watson Research Center, Jul. 28, 1994.Examiner
- Anderson, R., “UEPS a Second Generation Electronic Wallet,” University Computer Laboratory.Examiner
- Anderson, R., “Why Cryptosystems Fail”.Examiner
- Angrist, S., “Iowa Market Takes Stock of Presidential Candidates,” Wall Street Journal, Aug. 28, 1995.Examiner
- Aquilera, M.C., “Coin Collectors Go International Via Cyberspace,” San Diego Daily Transcript, Apr. 17, 1995.Examiner
- Asset Management Control, Inc., Business Process PowerPoint Presentation RE: Patent No. 08/189/987, 1993-1994.Examiner
- Automatic Newsgroup, “Google Newsgroup RE: New News Group re: Collecting Stamps,” Jan. 11, 1994.Examiner
- Bakos, JY., “A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplace,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1991, vol. 15, No. 3, p. 295-310.Examiner
- Banatre, J. et al., “The design and building of Enchere, a distributed electronic marketing system,” Communications of the ACM, Jan. 1986, vol. 29(1), pp. 19-29.Examiner
- Bank, D., “Coming to the Cyberworld: Virtual Cash,” Buffalo News Business, Mar. 15, 1995.Examiner
- Bank, D., “Turning PCs Into ATMS,” San Jose Mercury News, Feb. 7, 1995.Examiner
- Banks, V., “News Group Posting—Google Search RE: E-D-U-P-A-G-E,” Apr. 11, 1994.Examiner
- Barnes, S., “Newsgroup Posting RE: Light Boxes for Viewing Slides,” Sep. 15, 1994.Examiner
- Basil, K., CGI Script Used at internet Presence & Publishing to Implement MESCH Service “Newsgroup Posting RE: WAIS Searching Script with Support for Multiple Database Querying,” 1994, Internet Presence & Publishing Corp.Examiner
- Baty, J. et al., “InterShop: Enhancing the Vendor/Customer Dialectic in Electronic Shopping,” Journal of Management information Systems, 1995, vol. II, No. 4, pp. 9-31.Examiner
- Bellovin, S., “Usenet: The Great Renaming 1985-1988,” www.vrx.net, Jun. 8, 2002.Examiner
- Bendremer, S., “Downtown Anywhere: The New Internet City (Online Commerce Etc.),” Jul. 21, 1994, Google Newsgroup: comp.infosystems.announce.Examiner
- Benjamin, R., et al., “Electronic Markets and Virtual Value Chains on the Information Superhighway,” Sloan Management Review, Winter 1995.Examiner
- Bichl, S., “IC Cards In High Security Applications,” Voest Alpine, AG.Examiner
- Birenbaum, “Add-on encapsulation for router-based networks, product leaders/internetworking, data communications,” May 21, 1994, pp. 41-42.Examiner
- Blankenhorn, D., “Building the Tools for Web Commerce,” Interactive Age, Issue 208—Special Report, Feb. 13, 1995, CMP Publishers, Inc.Examiner
- Blankley, P., “E-mail RE: Acorn Collectors and eBay,” Jun. 15, 2002.Examiner
- Bos, J., “SmartCash a Practical Electronic Payment System,” Center for Mathematics and Computer Science, August.Examiner
- Brouwer, J. et al., “Human-Machine Communication for Educational Systems Design”.Examiner
- Burchfield, B., “Cast Study—The Cirrus Banking Network,” Aug. 1985.Examiner
- Burk, H., “A Value Exchange Systems Enabling security and Unobservavbility, Computers and Security”.Examiner
- Burmeister, J., “Google Search RE: Newton Mail Is Here!” Oct. 8, 1993.Examiner
- Business Editors / Computer Writers “Onsale: onsale brings thrill of auctions and bargain hunding online . . . ”Business Wire, May 22, 1995, Dialg File 610, Accession No. 0489267.Examiner
- Canessa, E. et al., “Proceedings of the WWW94 Workshop at CERN: Offering the Same Information Via Multiple Services”.Examiner
- Chabrow, E., “A New Era Is Brokered In” Information Week, Sep. 18, 1995.Examiner
- Chalker, K., “Newsgroup Posting RE: AMD/Intel?”, PSI Public Usenet Link, Sep. 20, 1994.Examiner
- Chalker, K., “Newsgroup Posting RE: Motherboards with BIOS Support for EIDE,” PSI Public Usenet Link, Oct. 5, 1994.Examiner
- Chalker, K., “Newsgroup Posting RE: Pentium Bug—How to Tell?” PSI Public Usenet Link, Nov. 25, 1994.Examiner
- Chalker, K., “Newsgroup Posting RE: For Sale: New Western Digital 1 Gb 1 DE Drive—$540!” Sep. 28, 1994, PSI Public Usenet Link.Examiner
- Channing Rodgers, R. P., et al., “Online Images From the History of Medicine (OLI): Creating a Large Searchable Image Database for Distribution Via World-Wide Web,” Lister Hill Center for Biomedical Communications.Examiner
- Chaum, D., “Abstract-Untraceable Electronic (Illegible),” Center for Mathematics and Computer Science.Examiner
- Chaum, D., “Achieving Electronic Privacy,” Scientific American, Aug. 1992.Examiner
- Chaum, D., “Implementing Capability-Based Protection Using Encryption,” Electronics Research Laboratory—University of Berkeley, Jul. 17, 1978.Examiner
- Chess, D. et al., “Itinerant Agents for Mobile Computing,” IEEE Personal Communications, Oct. 1995, pp. 34-49.Examiner
- Chess, D. et al., “Mobile Agents: Are They a Good Idea?” IBM Research Division, Jan. 7, 2002.Examiner
- Churbuck, D., “Dial-A-Catalog,” Forbes, Oct. 10, 1994, p. 126-130.Examiner
- Clemons, E. et al., “The Imapact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The More to the Middle Hypothesis,” Fall 1993, vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 9-35.Examiner
- Clifford, D. (Illegible), “Notes on Community Information Systems,” Dec. 10, 1989.Examiner
- Cohen, D., “Computerized Commerce,” Proceedings of the IFIP World Computer Congress Held Aug. 28-Sep. 1, 1989, Reprinted from Information Processing 89, Oct. 1989.Examiner
- Contini, A. et al., “Title Auction Selling,” Agriculture and Rural Division, Nov. 6, 2001.Examiner
- Cook, J., “Headline Send Fido Shopping Why Fight Crowds? Web Site Mascot Can Sniff Out Super Gifts While You Stay in Your Slippers,” St. Louis Post Dispatch Inc., Dec. 7, 1995.Examiner
- Crone, R., “Notes from the Infobahn: Navigating the Web of New Alliances In Cyberspace,” American Banker, Aug. 7, 1995.Examiner
- Crossley, “WAIS Through the Web discovering Environmental Information,” Sep. 19, 2000.Examiner
- Davies, Stephen A., “Treasury action to ‘go live’ with computer tenders. (Treasury Automated Auction Processing System, or TAAPS)(Public securities association supplement)” Bond Buyer v. 304, n2914, Apr. 29, 1993, p. 1A(3).Examiner
- Davis, J et al., “A Protocol and Server for a Distributed Digital Technical Report Library,” Apr. 25, 1994.Examiner
- Davis, J., “Dropin Publishing With the World Wide Web,” Xerox, Inc. and Cornell University, May 3, 1999.Examiner
- Debenedictis, E., “Goofle Search RE: Relative Speed of PERL vs TCL vs C,” Jan. 28, 1996.Examiner
- Del Rosso, L. “Marketel says it plans to launch air fare “auction” in June,” travel Weekly, Apr. 29, 1991, vol. 50(34), p. 1.Examiner
- Del Rosso, L. “Ticket-bidding firm closes its doors,” Travel Weekly, Mar. 12, 1992, vol. 51(21), p. 1.Examiner
- Dippold, R., “Google Newsgroup RE: Collecting Stamps,” Jan. 3, 1994.Examiner
- Eichmann, D., “The RBSE Spider Balancing Effective Search Against Web Load,” Repository Based Software Engineering Program.Examiner
- Elmer-Dewitt. P., “Battle for the Soul of the Internet,” Time Magazine Cover Story Technology Section, Jul. 26, 1994.Examiner
- Epper K., “Money Creators: Point of Sale Pioneer Setting Point of Sail on the Internet,” American Banker, Feb. 10, 1995, vol. 160, No. 28.Examiner
- Etzioni, O. et al., “A Softbot-Based Interface to the Internet,” Department of Computer Science and Engineering—University of Washington, Jul. 19, 2000.Examiner
- Etzioni, O. et al., “Intelligent Agents on the Internet: Fact, Fiction and Forecast,” May 30, 1995, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Examiner
- Excel, K., “Google Newsgroup RE: Shopping on the Net? Check this Out! Not an Ad By Me!!” Apr. 12, 1994.Examiner
- Feldman, Robert et al. “Auctions: theory and applications:” International Monetary Fund papers; v.40n3, pp. 485-511, Sep. 1993.Examiner
- Fielding, R., “Maintaining Distributed Hypertext Infostructures: Welcome to MOMSpider's Web,” Apr. 17, 1994, University of California, Irvine, CA.Examiner
- Finin, T. et al., “KQML as an Agent Communication Language,” Nov. 1994, p. 8, University of Maryland & Valley Forge Laboratory.Examiner
- Finlay, D., “A Safer System: Answers are Being Developed to the Main Booking Barrier on the Internet—The Security of Information,” Travel Agent, Apr. 10, 1995.Examiner
- Fong, T. et al., “Sucess and Failure Factors for Implementing Agricultural Electronic Markets,” Department of Information Systems Monash University, Jun. 11, 1997.Examiner
- Ford, K., “Newsgroup Posting RE: Kudos to KC Computers,” Sep. 13, 1994, MicroMagic, Huntsville, AL.Examiner
- Forsythe, R., [Letter to Professor Neumann Regarding the IPSM], Univeristy of Iowa, Jun. 5, 2002.Examiner
- Forsythe, R., et al., “The Iowa Presidential Stock Market: A Field Experiment,” Research in Expeirmental Economics, 1991, vol. 4, p. 1-43, JAI Press, Inc.Examiner
- Franklin, M. et al., “The Design and Implementation of a Secure Auction Service”.Examiner
- French, J. et al., “Final Report for NSF Grant: NSF-CDA-9308259,” Apr. 30, 1994.Examiner
- Gaffin, A., “RE: Need Information on the ‘Internet Shopping Network’”, May 18, 1994, Google Newsgroup: news.newusers.questions.Examiner
- Post, D. et al., “Application of Auctions as a Pricing Mechanism for the Interchange of Electric Power,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Aug. 1995, vol. 10, No. 3, p. 1580-1584.Examiner
- Putz, S., “Interactive Information Services Using World Wide Web Hypertext,” Apr. 20, 1994, Prepared for First International Conference on World-Wide Web, May 25-27, 1994, Geneva, Switzerland.Examiner
- Raeder, A., “Internet World 95: An Eyewitness Report,” Information Today, May 1, 1995.Examiner
- Rangaswamy, A., “New Production Development (NPD) Turbo-Charged by the Internet”.Examiner
- Reck, M., “Formally Specifying an Automated Trade Execution System,” The Journal of Systems and Software, 1993, vol. 21, Elsevier Science Publishing, USA.Examiner
- Reck, M., “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions,” Focus Theme.Examiner
- Rescorla, E. et al., “The Secure Hypertext Transfer Protocol,” Enterprise Integration Technologies, Jun. 1994.Examiner
- Resnick, P. et al., “Twenty-Second Annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference: Papers Section 2,” Oct. 1-3, 1994, p. 1-23, Solomons, MD.Examiner
- Rodriguez, K., “Netscape Upgrades Web Servers; Offers New Apps to Enable Commerce,” InforWorld, Mar. 27, 1995, Section: Top of the News, p. 12.Examiner
- Lifton, Ron, “RND's ethernet bouter family—an inside look, computer communications, product description”, vol. 12 (5), Oct. 1989, pp. 288-294.Examiner
- Rossler, M. et al., “Intelligent Agents: Software Servants for an Electronic Information World and More,” Online, Jul. 1, 1994.Examiner
- Rubin, B., “Google Newsgroup RE: Newsday Online/Software,” Nov. 30, 1994.Examiner
- Sackman, G., Newsgroup Posting RE: Think Big! Products WWW Site from WorldMart™ , Nov. 10, 1994, CERFnet.Examiner
- Safdar, S. J., “(FAQ) Internet Parental Control,” Aug. 8, 1995, Google Newsgroup: comp org eff talk comp org cpsr talk alt wired alt politics datahighway.Examiner
- Sandberg, J., “Business Brief: Electronic Check-Payment Plan for the Internet to be Developed,” The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 23, 1995.Examiner
- Sandberg, J., “Cybercash Receives Clearance to Expert Payment Software,” The Wall Street Journal, May 8, 1995.Examiner
- Sandberg, J., “Electronic Check Payment Plan in Development for the Internet,” The Asian Wall Street Journal, Aug. 24, 1995.Examiner
- Sandberg, J., “Firms to Allow Internet Buying by Credit Card,” The Wall Street Journal Europe, Nov. 14, 1994.Examiner
- Sandberg, J., “MasterCard Aims to Link Internet with Credit Cards,” The Wall Street Journal, Jan. 10, 1995.Examiner
- Sandberg, J., “MasterCard Fires Back In Dispute Over the Internet,” The Wall Street Journal, Oct. 5, 1995.Examiner
- Sandberg, J., “MasterCard, Backed By IBM and Others, Enters Fight for Internet-Payment Rules,” The Wall Street Journal, Oct. 4, 1995.Examiner
- Sandberg, J., “Mosaic, First Data in Move to Project Credit Card Transactions on Internet,” The Wall Street Journal, Nov. 14, 1994.Examiner
- Sandberg, J., “New Internet Security Lapse Raises Concern for Business Using the Web,” The Wall Street Journal, Feb. 21, 1995.Examiner
- Sandberg, J., “System Planned for Shopping on the Internet,” Sep. 13, 1994.Examiner
- Sandberg, J., “US Browsers Will be Able to Pay Online, But Security is a Concern,” Sep. 14, 1994.Examiner
- Sandholm, T. et al., “Issues in Automated Negotiation and Electronic Commerce: Extending the Contract Net Framework,” University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Examiner
- Santalesa, R., “Internet Security Standards Take Shape at Last; Web Commerce to Increase; Issues of Responsibility Remain,” Computer Shopper from Edwire, Jul. 1, 1995, vol. 15, No. 7.Examiner
- Schmid, B., “Electronic Markets; Intelligent Electronic Trading for Commodity Exchanges; Telematic Services in Finland; Information Logistics; Organizational Factors of Success in Using EDIS: A Survey of Tradent Participants; Computer Integrated Logistics; Electronic Trading Networks: The Route to Competitive Advantage The EDI World Institute: An International Approach; [others],” Electronic Markets, Oct. 1993, No. 9/10, University of Saint Gailen.Examiner
- Schmidt, B., “Research Issues: Electronic Markets,” Electronic Markets—Development of Electronic Commerce, Oct. 1993, No. 9/10, Univeristy of St. Gallen, Switzerland.Examiner
- Schmitz, T. “California computer auctions—no boon for bargain hunters,” Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, Sep. 13, 1993, Dialog File 609, Accession No. 2096205.Examiner
- Schwartz, M. “Internet Resource Discovery at the University of Colorado,” Oct. 1992.Examiner
- Schwartz, M. et al., “A Comparison of Internet Resource Discovery Approaches,” University of Colorado, Aug. 1992.Examiner
- Siegman, K., “Nowhere To Go But Up,” PC Week, Oct. 23, 1995, vol. 12, No. 42, p. 45.Examiner
- Simmons, B., “Trivia for Money re: Online Gaming for Cash Prizes,” Dec. 17, 1995, Google Newsgroup: rec games trivia.Examiner
- Sinton, P., “Allowance Trading: Electronic Auction Exceeds Expectations,” Environment and Energy Publishing, LLC, Apr. 27, 1995.Examiner
- Siong, N., “Hog Auction market: Managing Implementation Resistance,” Singapore Business Development series, 1996, pp. 252-275.Examiner
- Sirbu, M., “Internet Billing Server Prototype Scope Document in Technical Report 1993-,” Carnegie Mellon University Oct. 14, 1993.Examiner
- Sirbu, M., “Internet Billing Service Design and Prototype Implementation”.Examiner
- Sirbu, V., (Illegible) “Electronic Wallet”.Examiner
- Sjolin, M., “WWW Front End To An OODBMS.” Sweden.Examiner
- Smith, B., “Internet Marketing RE: Credit Card Transactions On the Net,” Nov. 22, 1994.Examiner
- Smith, N., “What Can Archives Offer the World Wide Web,” University of Kent at Canterbury, Mar. 22, 1994.Examiner
- Smith, V. et al., “Competitve Market Institutions: Double Auctions vs. Sealed Bid-Offer Auctions,” The American Economic Review, Mar. 1982, vol. 72, No. 1.Examiner
- Smith, V. et al., “On Nonbinding Price Controls in a Competitve Market,” The American Economic Review Jun. 1981, vol. 71, No. 3.Examiner
- Solomon, S., “Staking a Claim on the Internet,” Nov. 1996.Examiner
- Sommerfeld, W. “Newsgroup Posting RE: Registration on the Internet,” Apr. 19, 1995, Hewlett-Packard-Chelmsford Site.Examiner
- Speidel, R. et al., “Impact of electronic contracting on contract formation under revised UCC Article 2, Sales,” C878 ALI-ABA 335, Dec. 9, 1993.Examiner
- Stefano, C. et al., “Distributed Databases: An Overview,” 1984, p. 1-17 & 47-54, McGraw-Hill, Inc.Examiner
- Steinar, K., Newsgroup Posting RE: Making freeWAIS Easy to Setup/Configure, Aug. 31, 1994.Examiner
- Tao-Yang Wong, W., “FYI: CommerceNet Press Release,” [email protected], Telecom Digest, Apr. 27, 1994, vol. 14, ISSN:185.Examiner
- Tara, J., et al. “AOL Screen Name, Trial Account Abuse and Usenet (was Re: Warning: For Sale Fraud),” Jul. 7, 1994.Examiner
- Tatters, W., “Navigating the Internet with CompuServe,” Sams.net Publishing, 1st Edition, 1995.Examiner
- Taylor, D., Newsgroup Posting RE: The Internet Mall: Shopping the Information Highway, Oct. 16, 1994, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.Examiner
- Tenenbaum, J. et al., “Development of Network Infrasctructure and Services For Rapid Acquisition,” Jan. 2, 1992.Examiner
- Tenenbaum, J. et al., “Digest of Papers COMPCON '95—CommerceNet: Spontaneous Electronic Commerce on the Internet,” Technologies for the Information Super Highway, Mar. 5-9, 1995, San Francisco, CA.Examiner
- Tetzeli, R., “Electronic Storefronts on the Internet,” Fortune, Nov. 28, 1994, p. 191.Examiner
- Race, Tim, “The debate over electronic bidding reaches Washington.” The New York Times, Oct. 6, 1991, p. 12, col. 1.Examiner
- Titch, S. et al., “If you Build It, Will They Come? Information Service Providers Say The Market is There. All They Need Is A Way to Deliver the Information”, Telephony, Jun. 15, 1992, vol. 222, No. 24, Intertec Publishing Corporation.Examiner
- Tjostheim, I. et al., “A Case Study of an Online Auction for the World Wide Web,” Norwegian Computing Center.Examiner
- Tucker, J.,, “Google Search RE: Enter 13 Zip Entertainment Listing Service for Wildcat BBS,” Realty.Com, Oct. 14, 1995.Examiner
- Turban, E., “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment,” Focus Theme, California State University, Long Beach.Examiner
- Van Heck, E. et al., “Experiences with Eletronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry,” Focus Theme, Erasmus University, The Netherlands.Examiner
- Verity, J., “Truck Lanes for the Information Highway,” The McGraw Hill Publishers, Apr. 18, 1994, p. 112.Examiner
- Verity, J.W., “The Internet, How it Will Change the Way You Do Business,” Business Week, Nov. 14, 1994, pp. 80-88, McGraw Hill Publication.Examiner
- Buckman, A., Viacom to auction ‘Cosby’ spots. “Electronic business.” (Feb. 1, 1998), pp. 1-4.Examiner
- Voelker, et al., “Mobisaic: an information system for a mobile wireless computing environment” 1995 IEEE, pp. 185-190, Seattle, WA.Examiner
- Von Rosen, E., “The Evolving Electronic Commerce,” Intranets: AMG, Apr. 26, 1995.Examiner
- Voydock, V., “Security Mechanisms in High Level Network Protocols,” 1983.Examiner
- Wagner, M., “Online Cash and Credit Move Closer to Reality,” Open Systems Today, Feb. 20, 1995, Issue 169, CMF Publications.Examiner
- “Order And Opinion Denying the Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider,” dated Jan. 13, 2003.Examiner
- “Order And Opinion regarding eBay's Motion To Amend,” dated Oct. 21, 2002.Examiner
- Crocker, S.D., “Post-Markman Rebuttal Supplementation of Stephen D. Crocker,” filed by eBay on Dec. 23, 2002.Examiner
- “eBay Inc.'s Memorandum In Support Of eBay's Post-Markman Motion For Summary Judgment Of Noninfringement And Unenforceability Of U.S. Patent No. 6,202,051,” (Filed Under Seal) by eBay Nov. 15, 2002.Examiner
- “eBay Inc.'s Reply Memorandum In Support Of eBay's Post-Markman Motion For Summary Judgment Of Noninfringement And Unenforceability Of U.S. Patent No. 6,202,051,” (Filed Under Seal) by eBay on Dec. 13, 2002.Examiner
- Keller, A.M., “Supplement Expert Report Of Dr. Arthur M. Keller addressing Invalidity in View of the Court's Markman and Summary Judgment Rulings, the Subsequent Opinions of Drs. Weaver & Palmer, and Noninfringement in the View of the court's Markman Ruling,” filed by eBay on Dec. 23, 2002.Examiner
- Maly, K., “Post-Markman Supplemental Expert Report of Kurt Maly Regarding Noninfringement and Invalidity of US Patent No. 6, 085,176,” (Portions of this document have been redacted), filed by eBay on Dec. 20, 2002.Examiner
- Plott, C. L., “Post-Markman Supplementation/Rebuttal of Charles L. Plott,” filed by eBay on Dec. 17, 2002.Examiner
- Plott, C. R., “Expert Repot of Charles R. Plott,” filed by eBay on Jun. 10, 2002.Examiner
- Wellman, M. P., “Post-Markman Supplemental Expert Reports of Michael P. Wellman, PH.D., on the Invalidity and Noninfringement of US Patent No. 5,845,265,” (Portions of this document have been redacted), filed by eBay on Dec. 23, 2002.Examiner
- Weaver, A.C., “Rebuttal Expert Report on Alfred C. Weaver Regarding Allegations of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,202,051 and U.S. Patent No. 5,845,265,” filed by MercExchange on Jun. 28, 2002.Examiner
- Wellman, M. P., “Expert Report of Michael P. Wellman, PH.D. Concerning the Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 5,845,265,” filed by eBay, Returnbuy and Half.com on Jun. 7, 2002.Examiner
- Clarification Order Denying eBay's Motion for Summary Judgment that Claims 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35 of Patent '051 as well as the Joint Motion for Summary Judgment brought by the Defendants, that claims 1, 4, 5, 8, 10, 13, 115, 17, 20, 22, 23, 26 of Patent '265 are Invalid for lack of Novelty and Obviousness dated Jul. 25, 2002.Examiner
- Crocker, S.D., “Expert Repot of Stephen D. Crocker,” filed by eBay on Jun. 10, 2002.Examiner
- Dickinson, Q.T., “Rebuttal Expert Report of Q. Todd Dickinson,” filed by MercExchange on Jun. 28, 2002.Examiner
- Dickinson, Q.T., “Expert Report of Q. Todd Dickinson,” filed by MercExchange on Jun. 10, 2002.Examiner
- Frieder, O., “Rebuttal Expert Report of Ophir Frieder Regarding Defendants' Allegations of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,085,176,” filed by MercExchange on Jun. 28, 2002.Examiner
- Keller, A.M., “Expert Report of Arthur M. Keller,” filed by eBay on Jun. 9, 2002.Examiner
- Keller, A.M., “Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Arthur M. Keller,” (Portions of this document have been redacted), filed by eBay on Aug. 30, 2002.Examiner
- Maly, K. “Expert Report of Kurt Maly,” filed by eBay and Half.com on Jun. 10, 2002.Examiner
- Mossinghoff, G.J., “Expert Report on Hon. Gerald J. Mossinghoff,” filed by eBay, Half.com and ReturnBuy on Sep. 20, 2002.Examiner
- Palmer, J. W., “Rebuttal Expert Report of Jonathan W. Palmer Regarding Allegations of Invalidity,” filed by MercExchange on Jun. 28, 2002.Examiner
- Shamos, M.I., “Expert Report of Michael Ian Shamos Regarding Materiality of Prior Art References Not Disclosed by Patentee,” filed by eBay on Sep. 23, 2002.Examiner
- Shamos, M. I., “Expert Report of Michael Ian Shamos,” filed by eBay on Jun. 10, 2002.Examiner
- Schell, Ernest H., Management Software Update (Part 1); Catalog Age; May 1991; vol. 8, No. 5, p. 91(4).Examiner
- Schell, Ernest H., Management Software Update (Part 2), Catalog Age; Jun. 1992; vol. 9, No. 6, p. 87(4).Examiner
- Slater, Derek; “Internet Commerce Inches Forward”; Computerworld; Framingham; Mar. 6, 1995; Iss. 10; p. 101; 1 pgs.Examiner
- Athens, Gary H., “FCC auction built on client/server”; Computerworld; Framingham; Apr. 3, 1995; vol. 29, Iss. 14; p. 58, 1 pgs.Examiner
- Norton, Rob, “Winning the game of business”; Fortune; New York; Feb. 6, 1995; vol. 131, Iss. 2; p. 36, 1 pgs.Examiner
- Gaffin, A.M., “Everybody's Internet Update,” Feb. 1995, No. 9.Examiner
- Garcia, Beatrice; “Fast-moving pace is not for the shy or the undecided.” Herald Real Estate; Miami Herald Final Edition, p. 4G, Mar. 5, 1991.Examiner
- Gavin, B., “Web World: Corporate Solutions of Today,” Oct. 25, 1994, Google Newsgroup: news.announce.conferences.Examiner
- Gifford, D., “Cryptograph Sealing for Information Secrecy and Authentication,” 1982, Stanford Univeristy.Examiner
- Gifford, R., “GEAC's Plans for Supporting Silver Platter ERL,” Mar. 23, 1995, Google Newsgroup: bit.listserv.advanc-1.Examiner
- Gligor, V. et al., “Object Migration and Authentication,” IEEE Transaction on Software, Nov. 1979, p. 607-611.Examiner
- Goodman, S., “MCI Unveils Internet MCI: New MCI-Branded Software,” Mar. 27, 1995, Google Newsgroup: comp.dcom.telecom.Examiner
- Google Newsgroup RE: Computer Software and Hardware at Dealer Cost, May 12, 1994.Examiner
- Gordon, M., “Auctions become high tech.” Dealer Business, Mar. 1995, vol. 29 (7), p. 21.Examiner
- Graham, I. (Department of Business Studies, University of Edinburgh), “Electronic Livestock Auctions in the UK,” Electronic Markets, Nov. 6, 2001.Examiner
- Graham, I., “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe,” Focus Theme, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.Examiner
- Granacki, J. et al., “A Component Library Management System and Browser,” Apr. 19, 2000, University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute, p. 1-19.Examiner
- Grant, G., “Mosaic Communications Unveils Network Navigator and Server Software for the Internet,” Sep. 1, 1994.Examiner
- Hammonds, K., “Alex Randall: Planting ‘Seeds’ in the Third World,” Business Week, Nov. 12, 1990.Examiner
- Harty, K., “Case Study: The VISA Transaction Processing System,” May 30, 1988.Examiner
- Hess, C. et al., “Computerized Loan Organization Systems: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1994, vol. 18, No. 3, p. 251-275.Examiner
- Hoffman, D. et al., “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations,” Project 2000: Research Program on Marketing in Computer-Mediated Environments, Nov. 6, 2001.Examiner
- Horst, H., [Medline via Internet], Mar. 19, 1994, Google Newsgroup: de.sci.medizin.Examiner
- Hughes, K., “Entering the World-Wide Web: A Guide to Cyberspace,” Enterprise Integration Technologies, May 1994.Examiner
- [email protected], “Google Search RE: InterLNK and InterSVR Protocol,” Jul. 21, 1995.Examiner
- Individual announces revolutionary ‘Dutch Auction’ system for ads on news page web service Business Wire, p. 7241051, Jul. 24, 1995, Dialog File 148.Examiner
- Internet Presence Inc., “Electronic File Directory MESCH-WAIS,” Mar. 28, 2002.Examiner
- Internet Presence Inc., “MESCH: The Web's Multi-WAIS Engine for Searching Commercial Hosts,” Oct. 29, 1994.Examiner
- Internet Presence, Inc., Newsgroup Posting RE: Announce: Internet ShopKeeper, Aug. 2, 1994 (03:41:48).Examiner
- Internet Presence, Inc., Newsgroup Posting RE: Announce: Internet ShopKeeper, Aug. 2, 1994 (04:39:28).Examiner
- Internet Presence, Inc., Newsgroup Posting RE: Announce: Internet ShopKeeper, Aug. 2, 1994 (03:54:42).Examiner
- Internet Presence, Inc., Newsgroup Posting RE: BETA Testers Wanted: The Internet ShopKeeper, Jul. 20, 1994, Internet Presence Publishing Corp.Examiner
- Internet Presence, Inc., “Newsgroup Posting RE: Internet '95 Call for Submissions,” Mar. 23, 1995, Internet Presence & Publishing Corp.Examiner
- Internet Presence, Inc., Newsgroup Posting RE: Internet Business Reply Response, Sep. 8, 1994.Examiner
- Internet Presence, Inc., “Newsgroup Posting RE: Linking and Organizing,” Aug. 30, 1994.Examiner
- Internet Shopping Network, “First Auction Wins the Bid for Online” Jan. 7, 2002.Examiner
- [email protected], “RE: Internet Shopping Mall?,” Nov. 12, 1994, Google Newsgroup: alt.internet.services.Examiner
- Jackson Higgins, K., “Hitchhiker's Guide: Commerce On The Net: What's The Hold Up?” Open Systems Today, Oct. 31, 1994, Issue 162.Examiner
- Jackson, E., “Google Newsgroup RE: Stamp Collecting on Usenet in 1994 Part II,” Dec. 28, 1993.Examiner
- Jackson, E., “Google Newsgroup RE: Stamp Collecting on Usenet in 1994 Part III,” Dec. 28, 1993.Examiner
- Jackson, E., “Stamps Collecting on Usenet in 1994: Part I,” Dec. 27, 1993, Google Newsgroup: rec.collecting.Examiner
- Jacoby, P., “Newsgroup Posting RE: Nice Postcard for Best Answer,” Oct. 27, 1994, AmeriData Consulting Inc.Examiner
- Jelassi, T., “Competing Through EDI at Brun Passot: Achievements in France and Ambitions for the Single European Market,” MIS Quarterly, Dec. 1994, p. 337-352.Examiner
- Johnson et al., “Automated double oral auctions using IBM PC network,” Association for Computing Machinery, CSC '86 Cincinnati Proceedings, p. 507, Feb. 1986.Examiner
- Jones, R., “Digital's World-Wide Web Server: A Case Study ,” First International Conference on the World-Wide Web, Geneva, Switzerland, May 1994.Examiner
- Kan, J., “Financial-Investment Software,” MACworld: Streetsmart 1.0, Feb. 8, 2002, MAC Publishing LLC.Examiner
- Kaplan, J., & Intermart, [Message Confirmation], Jun. 4, 1994.Examiner
- Kaplan, J., [Re: Intermart], Feb. 1, 1994.Examiner
- Kareckas, L., “1 1/2 Smart Talk on Bargain Finder,” Oct. 24, 1995, Google Newsgroup: ba.smartvalley, ba.announce.Examiner
- Karpinski, R., “Front Ends: New Windows 95 Browsers on Tap ,” Interactive Age, Apr. 3, 1995, Issue 218.Examiner
- [email protected], “Re: [isppa-1] Web Page of Service Providers,” Aug. 24, 1994.Examiner
- [email protected], “Newsgroup Posing RE: Shopkeeper Beta Testing,” Jul. 14, 1994.Examiner
- [email protected], [email protected], “RE: Linking and Organizing”, Aug. 30, 1994.Examiner
- [email protected], Peters—[email protected], “Order for Taste Unlimited-Savory-Sauces”, Nov. 7, 1994.Examiner
- Keller, A. et al., “A Smart Catalog and Brokering Architecture for Electronic Commerce,”.Examiner
- Koepper, Ken, “Room inventory auctioning: the next CRS generation.” Lodging, Jan. 1990, pp. 26-30.Examiner
- Kinkade, M., “Re: DEC XL560 Pentium System for Sale,” Jun. 2, 1994, Google Newsgroup: la.forsale, ne.forsale, nj.forsale, ny.forsale, pa.forsale, Austin.forsale, ph.Examiner
- Klein, S., “Introduction to Electronic Auctions,” Focus Theme.Examiner
- Klemets, A., “The Design and Implementation of a Media on Demand for System for WWW,” The Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.Examiner
- Knoblock, C. et al., “An Architecture for Information Retrieval Agents,” p. 49-56, University of Southern California.Examiner
- Knoblock, C. et al., “Information Gathering From Heterogeneous Distributed Environments”, Papers from the 1995 AAAI Symposium, Mar. 27, 1995, AAAI Press.Examiner
- Knowles, A., “Payment Systems Link to Internet (CyberCash Inc.'s Internet Payment Services and Checkfree Corp's Checkfree Commercial Payment Service To Be Linked With Partners)”, PC Week, Jun. 5, 2001, vol. 12, No. 22, Ziff-Davis Publishing Company.Examiner
- Knowles, A., “Rival Transaction Models Emerging, On-Line Authentication Schemes Check Credit Cards or Users to Ensure Security (Open Market, Inc.'s Electronic Commerce Model and Cyber-Cash, Inc.'s Model)”, PC Week, Mar. 27, 1995, vol. 12, No. 12, Ziff-Davis Publishing Company.Examiner
- Koster, M., “Aliweb—Archie-Like Indexing in the Web,” Mar. 16, 1994, Version 1.0, p. 1-10.Examiner
- Kotay, K. et al., “Transportable Agents,” Nov. 10, 1994, p. 1-15, Dartmouth College.Examiner
- Krajewski et al., “Applicability of Smart Cards to Network User Authentication,” Computing Systems, Winter 1994, vol. 7, No. 1, p. 75-89, The Mitre Corp.Examiner
- Krajewski, M., “Concept for a Smart Card Kerberos,” The Mitre Corp, Bedford, MA.Examiner
- Krajewski, M., “Smart Card Augmentation of Kerberos,” The Mitre Corp, Bedford, MA.Examiner
- Krishnamurthy, B. et al., “Web Protocols and Practice,” HTTP/1.1, Networking Protocols, Caching, & Traffic Measurement, 2001, p. 6, Addison-Wesley Publishing.Examiner
- Kutler, J. et al., “Information Superhighway: Looking More and More Like a Business Route”, American Banker, Nov. 18, 1994, vol. 159, No. 223, p. 14.Examiner
- Kuttner, R., “Computers may turn the world into one big commodities pit.” Business Weed, Sep. 11, 1989, No. 3123, p. 17.Examiner
- Lagoze, C. et al., “Dienst Implementation Reference Manual”, May 5, 1995, p. 1-69.Examiner
- Lapp, J., “Web User Head Count”, Jun. 15, 1994, Google Newsgroup: comp.inforsystems.www.providers.Examiner
- Lashkari, Y. et al., “Collaborative Interface Agents,” MIT Media Laboratory.Examiner
- Ledyard, J. et al., “Using Computerized Exchange Systems to Solve an Allocation Problem in Project Management,” California Institute of Technology, Nov. 1993.Examiner
- Lee, H., “Aucnet: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions”, Focus Theme.Examiner
- Lee, H., “Proceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences—1996” Electronic Brokerage and Electronic Auction: the Impact of it on Market Structures, pp. 397-406.Examiner
- Lee, R. et al., “Shopping In The Electronic Marketplace,” Journal of Management Information System, Spring 1986, vol. 2, No. 4.Examiner
- Lewis, P., “Attention Shoppers: Internet is Open,” The New York Times, Aug. 12, 1994, Section: D, p. 1, col. 3.Examiner
- Lichty, T., “The Official America Online for Macintosh Tour Guide,” 1994, 2nd Edition, Ventana Press.Examiner
- Lichty, T., “The Official America Online for Windows Tour Guide,” 1994, 2nd Edition, Ventana Press.Examiner
- Lietzke, R., “Outsider Buys Into Checkfree Tribune Co. of Chicago Purchases Minority Stake in Bill-Payment Firm,” The Columbus Dispatch, Dec. 6, 1994.Examiner
- Lindsey, D. et al., “TELCOT: An Application of Information Technology for Competitive Advantage in the Cotton Industry,” MIS Quarterly, Dec. 1990, p. 347-357.Examiner
- Liss, K., “Tradewinds vol. 1.3 (Monthly Round-Up of Internet Coverage in Trade and Industry Magazine),” Dec. 19, 1994, Google Newsgroup: bit.listserv.buslib-1.Examiner
- Lucking-Reiley, D., “Using Field Experiments to Test Equivalence Between Auction Formats: Magic on the Internet,” The America Economic Review, Dec. 1999, p. 1063-1080.Examiner
- Lynch, M. et al., “Product Quality, Information Efficiency, and Regulations in Experimental Markets,” Research in Experimental Economics, 1991, p. 269-318.Examiner
- Lynch, S., “Online // Get Ready to Shop, Bank Safely on Net,” The Orange County Register, Jun. 5, 1995.Examiner
- Maa, M. et al., “Recent Improvements in the NASA Technical Report Servers,” Oct. 1995, p. 1-10, http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/NTRS.Examiner
- Machrone, B., “Digital Cash Options Need A Closer Look (Online Banking Transactions) (Up Periscope),” PC Week, Apr. 10, 1995, vol. 12, No. 14, Ziff-Davis Publishing.Examiner
- Maes, P., “Modeling Adaptive Autonomous Agents,” MIT Media-Laboratory.Examiner
- Maes, P., “Intelligent Agents: Agents that Reduce Work and Information Overload,” Communications of the ACM, Jul. 19, 2000, vol. 37, No. 7.Examiner
- Malcolm, K., “Newsgroup Posting RE: Real Estate Related WWW Providers Wanted . . . ” Nov. 3, 1994.Examiner
- Malcolm, K., Internet Presence, Inc., Newsgroup Posting RE: Web Page of Service Providers, Aug. 24, 1994.Examiner
- Malone, P., “Re: How to Access CompuServe? The Answer,” May 13, 1995, Google Newsgroup: comp.graphics.packages.3dstudio.Examiner
- Malone, T. et al., “The Logic of Electronic Markets,” Harvard Business Review, May-Jun. 1989, pp. 166-169.Examiner
- Malone, T. et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies,” Communications of the ACM, Jun. 1987, vol. 14, Issue 25.Examiner
- Maly, K. et al., “Wide Area Technical Report Service,” Final Report, National Science Foundation, Apr. 30, 1994, 12 pages (pp. 1-6, with Figures).Examiner
- Maly, K. et al., “Wide Area Technical Report Service,” Waters Technical Report, Apr. 30, 1994, http://archive.ncsa.edu/SDG/IT94/Proceedings/Databases/maly/maly/html.Examiner
- Marien, GK., “Google Search Subject Stamps List Update,” Nov. 2, 1992, Google Newsgroup: rec.collecting.rec.collecting.stamps.Examiner
- Martin et al., “Sold! The professional's guide to real estate auctions.” Published by Kathleen A. Welton, 1991, p. 247-248.Examiner
- Maskery, M., “Car auction reaches into space.” Automotive News, Dialog File 16, Accession No. 03482064, Nov. 25, 1991, p. 6.Examiner
- Massimb, M. et al., “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity,” Financial Analysts Journal, Feb. 1994, vol. 80, No. 1, p. 39-51.Examiner
- Mayega, V., “WWW.Mall of the Future,” From The Moment (Dec. 7, 1994) Jan. 7, 2002, p. 7.Examiner
- McBryan, O., “GENVL and WWWW: Tools for Taming the Web,” Apr. 19, 2000.Examiner
- McCarthy, Gene, “The electronic auctioning of servicing,” Mortgage Banking, Dec. 1994, p. 95-98.Examiner
- McKee, D., “Towards Better Integration of Dynamic Search Technology and the World-Wide Web”.Examiner
- Medvinsky, G. et al., “Netcash: A Design for Practical Electronic Currency on the Internet,” Information Sciences Institute University of Southern California.Examiner
- Mendez, M., “Google Search Subject: Free Personal Ads,” Feb. 10, 1995, Google Newsgroup: alt.personals.Examiner
- Merrill, K., “GE Capital to Extend Integrator Buying Spree”, Computer Reseller News, pp. 2 and 32, Jul. 1996.Examiner
- Metcalfe, R., “From the Ether Internet Digital Cash, Don't Leave Your Home Page Without It,” InfoWorld, Mar. 13, 1995, vol. 17, Issue 11.Examiner
- Miller, M., “Netbill (@)—Credit Cards on the Net,” Dec. 22, 1994, Google Newsgroup: comp.org.cpsr.talk.Examiner
- Mockapetris, P., “RFC1034: Domain Names—Concepts and Facilities,” Nov. 1987.Examiner
- Mockapetris, P., “RFC1035: Domain Names—Implementation and Specification,” Nov. 1987.Examiner
- Montanaro, S., Newsgroup Posting RE: Automatrix Announces its World Wide Web Server, Sep. 3, 1994, GE Corporation Research and Development, Schenectady, NY.Examiner
- Morgan, J., “No-Cost, No-Hassle Programs for Trading Funds From Home,” NewsDay, Inc., Oct. 2, 1994, Section: Money & Careers, p. 6.Examiner
- Morris, M., “Newsgroup Posting RE: BIG-WWW Service Providers List,” Aug. 31, 1994, Finesse Liveware.Examiner
- Mulqueen, J.T., “Checkfree Asks IPO Investors to Underwrite $50M Offering,” Communications Week, Sep. 25, 1995, Issue 576.Examiner
- Murray, E., “Re: SSL/STLP Winsock Implementation,” Aug. 13, 1996.Examiner
- National Westminster Bank, “Clearing House Automated Payments System”.Examiner
- NCSA: Mosaic and the Web Conference Oct. 14, 1994—“WWW 94 Vendor Exhibits”.Examiner
- Neches, A. (University of Southern CA), “Fast-A Research Project in Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets, No. 9-10, Oct. 19, 2000, pp. 25-28.Examiner
- Needham, R., Adding Capability Access to Conventional File Servers,: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, p. 3-4.Examiner
- Nelson, M. et al., “The Widest Practicable Dissemination: The NASA Technical Report Server,” 1995.Examiner
- Nelson, M. et al., “Electronic Document Distribution: Design of the Anonymous FTP Langley Technical Report Server,” NASA Technical Memorandum 4567, Mar. 1994.Examiner
- Nelson, M. et al., “World Wide Web Implementation of the Langley Technical Report Server,” NASA Technical Memorandum 109162, Sep. 5, 1994.Examiner
- Nelson, M.L. et al., “The World Wide Web and Technology Transfer at NASA Langley Research Center,” Oct. 21, 1994, Proceedings of The Second International World Wide Web Conference: Mosaic and the Web, Chicago, IL, Oct. 19-21, 1994, p. 701-710.Examiner
- Neuman, B.C., “Proxy-Based Authorization and Accounting for Distributed Systems,” May 1993, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Pittsburgh.Examiner
- Neuss, C. et al., “Lost in Hyperspace Free Text Searches in the Web,” Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics.Examiner
- Nimmer, R., “Electronic Contracting: Legal Issues,” Journal of Computer and Information Law vol. XVI, pp. 211-246 (1996).Examiner
- Nishihara et al., “A new scheme of connectionless transmission over ATM with scalability and cut-through technique.” XVI World Telecom Congress Proc. Sep. 21, 1997, p. 199-206.Examiner
- Oakland, A., “Transcript of June 11 NBC Story on Cyber Selling,” Jun. 16, 1994, Newsgroup: news.admin.misc.Examiner
- Obraczka, K. et al., “Internet Resource Discovery”, Sep. 1993, p. 8-22.Examiner
- Okamoto, T. et al., “Universal Electronic Cash ,” p. 324-337, NTT Laboratories.Examiner
- Omidyar, P., “Google Newsgroup RE: Auction Web: Interactive Web Auction,” Sep. 12, 1995.Examiner
- Paradigm Shift Corporation, “DEC XL560 Pentium for Sale”, May 31, 1994, Google Newsgroup: la.forsale; ne.forsale; nj.forsale; ny.forsale; pa.forsale; austin.forsale; ph.Examiner
- Peniston, B. et al., “Intro to Internet Digital Dollars on the Internet,” Apr. 16, 1995 Section: Business, p. B5.Examiner
- Pfitzmann, B. et al., “How to Break and Repair a ‘Provably Secure’ Untraceable Payment System,” p. 338-350.Examiner
- Picard, J., “Re: Bob's First Internet Stamp Auction,” Apr. 26, 1995, Google Newsgroup: rec.collecting.stamps.Examiner
- Jun. 28, 2002, eBay's compulsory disclosure under 35 U.S.C. §282, which included over 165 patents and 500 so-called “publications” including the following documents: (1) the Fujisaki Patent; (2) the Lalonde Patent; (3) the Lindsey Patent; (4) the Kelly Patent; (5) U.S. Patent No. 6,049,785 to Gifford (the “Gifford Patent”); (6) U.S. Patent No. 5,402,336 to Spiegelhoff et al. (the “Spiegelhoff Patent”); (7) the Davis and Lagoze article; and (8) the Keller et al. summary entitled “A Smart Catalog And Brokering Architecture For Electronic Commerce”(the “Keller summary”).Examiner
- Aug. 30, 2002, eBay's Second Supplemental Response to MercExchange 's Interrogatories providing additional alleged “prior art” upon which it would rely at trial to support its invalidity defenses under §§ 102 and 103.Examiner
- Apr. 24, 2003, FInal Pretrial Order of the District Court. That Final Pretrial Order included the same materials upon which eBay relies in its Requests for Reexamination.Examiner
- Feb. 26, 2003, Judgement And Order executed by the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia of ReturnBuy.com, Inc., inter alia, admitting validity and infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,845,265.Examiner
- The district court's Final Pretrial Order included as triable issues the alleged invalidity of MercExchange's ′265 and ′176 Patents under Sections 1O2 and 1O3.Examiner
- Jury Verdict of validity and infringement of 41 claims of the ′265 and ′176 Patents.Examiner
- Trial Transcript at 2252-2495, 2584-3120 validity contentions concerning the art of record.Examiner
- Jun. 12, 2003, eBay's Renewed Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law and for a new trial, asserting, again, Invalidity of the ′265 and ′176 Patents.Examiner
- Aug. 6, 2003, Final Judgment of the Federal Disctrict Court of the Eastern District of Virginia finding that there was substantial evidence supporting the jury 's verdict that MercExchange's ′265 and′′176 Patents were not invalid.Examiner
- Aug. 20, 2003, eBay's Notice of Appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.Examiner
- Jan. 6, 2004, eBay's Appeal Brief with the Federal Circuit (corrected brief).Examiner
- http://members.tripod.com/zzozzl/zbay/retrobay/welcome.html, Auction Web Welcome.Examiner
- http://groups-beta.google.com/group/misc.forsale.non-computer/messages/d45b835b280cfdd8?hl=en&t . . . , Omidyar, “AuctionWeb: Interactive Web Auction”, Sep. 24, 1995.Examiner
- http://groups-beta.google.com/group/misc.forsale.computers.pc-specific.misc/messages/ace1f724ea0f45 . . . , Omidyar, “Auctionweb: Interactive Web Auction”, Sep. 13, 1995.Examiner
- http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.infosystems.www.browsers.misc/msg/ede1e062aa087710?q . . . , Omidyar, “WebMail Watch Service”, Aug. 25, 1995.Examiner
- http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/Software/Mosaic/Docs/whats-new.html, The What's New Archives, Global NetworkNavigator, Inc., 1996.Examiner
- http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=author:pierre%40ebay.com+auctionweb&num=50&hl+en&ie . . . , Google Search May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://groups-beta.google.com/group/misc.forsale.non-computer/msg/d45b835b280cfdd8?hl=en&ie=IS . . . , Google Groups : misc.forsale.non-computer, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?num=50&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&q=%22aw@e . . . , Google Search May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ba.market.forsale/browse—thread/thread/614165e5d256eeb8/23b1e . . . , Google Groups : ba.market.forsale, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.marketing.online.ebay/browse—thread/thread/712d54a0ffad2e55/ . . . , Google Groups : alt.marketing.online.ebay, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://groups.google.com/groups?num=100&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&:oe=ISO-8859-1&scoring=r& . . . , May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://groups.google.com/groups?q=author:pierre%40ebay.com+auctionweb&num=50&h1=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1.Examiner
- http://groups.google/com/groups?num=100&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&scoring=r&as—drrb=b&q=author%[email protected]&btnG=Google+Search&as—mind=1&as—minm=1&as—miny=1996&as—maxd=31&as—maxm=3&as—maxy=1996.Examiner
- http://groups.google.com/groups?h1=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&selm=pierre-2409951422240001%40pierre.vip.best.com.Examiner
- http://groups.google.com/groups?num=50&h1=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&q=%22aw#ebay.com%22+bay&area.Examiner
- http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.infosystems.www.announce/msg/2a6c7fbb1c7162ae?q=%22 . . . , Google Groups: comp.infosystems.www.announce, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- Google Groups, viewing message [email protected], newsgroups: misc.forsale.non-computer.Examiner
- http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.censorship/msg/a12befe479d7006a?q=pierre+author:pierre+aut . . . , Google Groups: Alt.censorship.Examiner
- http://groups.google.com/groups?1=author:pierre%40netcom.com&h1=en&selm=1993Mar10.064848.2020%40netcom.com&mum=16, Google Groups: Alt.personals.bondage, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://groups.google.com/groups?q=author:pierre%40netcom.com&h1=en&selm=pierre-0211941530410001%40pierre.slip.netcom.com&mum=5.Examiner
- http://groups.google.com/groups?q=pierre+author:pierre+author:omidyar&start=50&h1=en&scoring=r&selm=1993Mar3.075423.16960%40netcom.com&mum=64.Examiner
- http://groups.google.com/groups?q=author:pierre%40claris.com&h1=en&selm=11057%40claris.com&mum=3.Examiner
- http://groups.google.com/groups?q=author:pierre+author.omidyar7start=50&h1=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&scoring=r&selm=11086%40claris.com&mum=84.Examiner
- http://groups.google.com/groups?num=100&h1=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&scoring=r&as—drrb=b&q=author%[email protected]&btnG=Google&Search&as—mind=1&as—minm=1&as—miny=1996&as—maxd=31&as—maxm=3&as—maxy=1996.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web19981202085151/http://www.ebay.com/aw/update.html, “What's new at eBay's AuctionWeb”, AuctionWeb What's New, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19961221031919/http://calculus.ebay.com, “Welcome to eBay!”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19970614001443/www.ebay.com, “Welcome to eBay!”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990219155122/http://www.ebay.com/aw/welcome.html, AuctionWeb Welcome, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990422032535/http://www.ebay.com/aw/welcome.html, eBay Welcome, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19981202085151/http://www.ebay.com/aw/update.html, “What's new at eBay's AuctionWeb”, AuctionWeb What's New, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990117002622/www2ebay.com/aw/registration.html, “Registered user services”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19981205044546/http://www.2ebay.com/aw/user-query.html, “Registered user information request”, AuctionWeb User Query, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990221044526/www2ebay.com/aw/account-order.html, “Create your AuctionWeb account”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/20010322200718/pages.ebay.com/unavailable/page-not-found.html, “We could not locate the page your requested”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990203225956/http://www2ebay.com/aw/jobs.html, “Job opportunities at eBay Inc.—Last Update, Aug. 8, 1997”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/1998/1206125104/http://www2ebay.com/aw/billing/html, “AuctionWeb Billing Information”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990428172805/wwwebay.com/aw/adult.html, “eBay Adults Only Information”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19991109040954/http://www.ebay.com/aw/adult.html, “eBay Adults Only Information”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19981206050054/http://www.ebay.com/aw/listings/lists/list-54/list-54.html, “AuctionWeb Listings—Computer Software—Macintosh”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990508170258/www.ebay.com/aw/computer-index.html, eBay Computers, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990218074857/http://www2.ebay.com/aw/listings/lists/list-92/list-92.html, “AuctionWeb Listings—Photography, Video Equipment”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990429051242/http://www.ebay.com/aw/photo-index.html, eBay Photo & Electronics, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19981203032739/www2ebay.com/aw/user-feedback.html, “Give some feedback on an AuctionWeb user”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/20000511212217/wwwebay.com/aboutebay/index.html, “Win a trip to the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games!”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19981205202636/http://www2ebay.com/aw/construction—news/, “Welcome to Construction News!”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990223205606/www2ebay.com/aw/contruciton—news/html/june.html, June Updates, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990224132540/http://www2ebay.com/aw/faq.html, “Frequently asked questions”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/19981206111341/http://www2ebay.com/aw/faq.html, “Frequently asked questions”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://web.archive.org/web/20000303121535/http://www.ebay.com/auto-index.html, “eBay Automotive”, May 18, 2005.Examiner
- http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9605B&L=magiccap&p=R3745 . . . Magiccap archives—May 1996, week 2 (#114), May 18, 2005.Examiner
- Nov. 7, 2001, defendant eBay et al. Answer to MercExchange's Complaint, alleging affirmative defenses of invalidity based on 35 U.S.C. §103 (obviousness).Examiner
- “Acorns Collectors Service Network” pamphlet, Memphis, Tennessee, late 1980's.Examiner
- Affinity Traders Online Business Plan, Aug. 18, 1995.Examiner
- Andrews, Online Users Hide Their Identities for Many Reasons, Legal and Illegal, Seattle Times, Nov. 20, 1994.Examiner
- Amix Cuts Staff in Wake of Leaving Parent Company, The Business Journal-San Jose, Sep. 7, 1992.Examiner
- ANIS, First Virtual Bank of Cyberspace, Oct. 28, 1994.Examiner
- Art Listing Form, published by Artsearch, late 80's-early 90's.Examiner
- Art Listing Form (complete), published by Artsearch, Dec. 12, 1988.Examiner
- Artsearch Advertisement, prior to 1993.Examiner
- Artsearch Seller Letter, late 80's-early 90's.Examiner
- Auctions.com1: Corporate Information, prior to Jun. 10, 2000.Examiner
- Auctions.com2: Frequently Asked Questions, prior to Jun. 10, 2000.Examiner
- Auctions.com3: Pay by Check, prior to Jun. 10, 2000.Examiner
- Auctions.com4: Merchant Central, prior to Jun. 10, 2000.Examiner
- Auctions.com5: Antiques & Decorative Arts, prior to Jun. 10, 2000.Examiner
- Auctions.com6: View All Categories, prior to Jun. 10, 2000.Examiner
- Auctions.com7: Search, 2000.Examiner
- Bazeley, Ubid Marketing itself as Legally Safer than eBay, San Jose Mercury News, Jun. 12, 2004, p. 3.Examiner
- Beware Re: Cybercoins—http://www.numismatists.com.Examiner
- Borman, Electronic Agriculture Auctions in the United Kingdom, Electronic Markets, 9-10, The Internation Journal, Oct. 1993, p. 27-28.Examiner
- Choy, Electronic Stamp Auction, Google Groups, Jun. 6, 1994.Examiner
- Cybercoins—http://www.numismatists.com.Examiner
- Dyson, Information, Bid and Asked, Forbes, vol. 146, Issue 4, Aug. 20, 1990.Examiner
- eBay 2000 10-K, 2000.Examiner
- eBay: Last Man Standing, CNET.com, Apr. 20, 2002.Examiner
- eBay: Prospectus, 1998.Examiner
- eBay: Return of the IPO-Internet auction company stock zooms on the first day of trading, CNNmoney.com, Sep. 24, 1998.Examiner
- Kehoe, Technology: Caught in the Web—A new cyberspace neighbourhood has joined the Internet and traffic in brisk, Financial Times, Nov. 25, 1994.Examiner
- First Virtual Holdings: look, Ma, no cryptol, Jan. 24, 1995.Examiner
- Griffin, Corporate Art Buying Meets Technology, Colorado Business Magazine, Mar. 1990.Examiner
- Hildesley, Sotheby's Guide to Buying and Selling at Auction, K. S. Giniger Co., Inc., 1984.Examiner
- Hubbard, Announcing Interactive Coin Auctions on the Web, Oct. 16, 1995.Examiner
- Hubbard, Auction Report for Brad Shiff, Nov. 1, 1995.Examiner
- Interactive Coin Sales Begin Using Online Computers, Coin World, Oct. 23, 1995.Examiner
- Lewis, Auction of Collectibles on the Internet, The New York Times, May 25, 1995, p. 4.Examiner
- Menefee, San Jose Mercury News on the Internet, Newsbytes, Jan. 20, 1995.Examiner
- Mosaic web-browser, since 1994.Examiner
- Moss, Bob's First Internet Stamp Auction, Apr. 25, 1995.Examiner
- Numismatists Online Brochure, Oct. 1995.Examiner
- Numismatists Online Marketing Video, Oct. 1995.Examiner
- Numismatists Online Marketing Video Screenshots, Oct. 1995.Examiner
- Orr, Joins the Information Economy, Computer Aided Engineering, Apr. 1992, p. 84.Examiner
- “Packet Switching”, Wikipedia, Nov. 10, 2006.Examiner
- Padgett, Infomration Marketplace Stocks “Shelves” for Mid-June Debut, Link-Up, May/Jun. 1992.Examiner
- Phillips, How to Dominate the Online Auction Market, 2005.Examiner
- Regan, Ubid Adds Auction Traffic with iWon Deal, E-Commerce Times, Mar. 6, 2001.Examiner
- Screenshots of http://www.numismatists.com, Oct. 1995.Examiner
- Stewart, et al., Boom Time on the New Frontier, Fortune, Sep. 27, 1993.Examiner
- Whitaker, American Information Exchange, Jan. 5, 1993.Examiner
- Zitner, American Online Pulls Plug on Software Scam, Boston Globe, Feb. 3, 1995.Examiner
- American Information Exchange, Jan. 5, 1993.Examiner
- Weisman, “Amix Cuts Staff in Wake of Leaving Parent Company”, The Business Jurnal—San Jose, Sep. 7, 1992.Examiner
- Moss, “Bob's First Internet Stamp Auction”, Apr. 25, 1995.Examiner
- Electronic livestock auctions starting in Britain, Agra Europe, Dialog File 148; 04887015, Nov. 22, 1990.Examiner
- Electronic Stamp Auction, Jun. 6, 1994, Heng-Wah.Examiner
- First Virtual Holdings: look, Ma, no crypto!.Examiner
- Gallery in a Database, Sep./Oct. 1990.Examiner
- Google Group listings of: AuctionWeb.pdf, ebay webmail.pdf, search for AuctionWeb.pdf.Examiner
- NCSA Archives for eBay.pdf.Examiner
- Packet Switching, Wikipedia, Nov. 14, 2006.Examiner
- Zither, “America Online Pulls.Plug on Software Scam”, Boston Globe, Feb. 3, 1995.Examiner
- How Digital Cameras Work, Retrieved from the Internet: <http://electronics.howstuffwork.com/digital-camera1.htm>.Examiner
- eBay, www.ebay.com, SEC disclosure, Sep. 1995.Examiner
- Save The Earth Foundation: Internet Onhne Rock and Roll Art Auction Celebrating Earth Day Is Declaled Open To The.Examiner
- Computer Museum Holds An Internet Auction Open Systems Today (1994).Examiner
- Choy Heng-Wah, Re: Electronic Stamp Auction, ree.colleeting.stamps (Jun. 17, 1994).Examiner
- The Official America Online for Macintosh Tour Guide (2d Ed., Ventana Press 1994).Examiner
- http://members.tripod.com/zzozz1/zbay/retrobay/welcome.html, Auction Web Welcome.Examiner
- Schell, Ernest H., Management Software Update (Part 1); Catalog Age, May 1991, vol. 8, No. 5.Examiner
- Schell, Ernest H., Management Software Update (Part 2); Catalog Age, Jun. 1992, vol. 9, No. 6.Examiner
- American Law Institute, Draft-Uniform Commercial Code Revised Article 2 (Sales), Parts 2, 3 and 7, pp. 1-15, Jan. 4, 1996, printed from http://www.kentlaw.edu/ulc/uniform/uccart2/chapt2/ucc2c237.html.Applicant
- Banâtre, J., et al., The Design And Building Of Enchère, A Distributed Electronic Marketing System, Communications of the ACM, Jan. 1986, vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 19-29.Applicant
- “BookIt!,” Datalex Communications, USA, Inc., Web Ventures, 1999, http://www.webventures.com/bookit.Applicant
- “BookIt!,” Web Ventures, 1996, http://www.webventures.com/bookit.Applicant
- Business Editors/Computer Writers, “Onsale: Onsale Brings Thrill Of Auctions And Bargain Hunting Online: Unique Internet Retail Service Debuts With Week-Long Charity Auction For The Computer Museum In Boston,” Business Wire, May 22, 1995, Dialog File 610, Accession No. 0489267.Applicant
- Del Rosso, L., “Marketel Says It Plan To Launch Air Fare ‘Auction’ In June,” Travel Weekly, Apr. 29, 1991, vol. 50, No. 34, p. 1.Applicant
- Del Rosso, L., “Ticket-Bidding Firm Closes Its Doors,” Travel Weekly, Mar. 12, 1992, vol. 51, No. 21, p. 1.Applicant
- Golden, F., “AAL's Riga Doubts Marketel's Appeal To Retailers; Chris Riga Of American Airlines,” Travel Weekly, Nov. 13, 1989, vol. 48, No. 91, p. 4.Applicant
- Gordon, M., “Auctions Become High Tech,” Dealer Business, Mar. 1995, vol. 29, No. 7, p. 21.Applicant
- Goulde, M., “Sun Microsystems Bringing Interactive Technology to the WWW,” Open Information Systems, 10:3, p. 29, Mar. 1995.Applicant
- Kuttner, R., “Computers May Turn The World Into One Big Commodities Pit,” Business Week, Sep. 11, 1989, No. 3123, p. 17.Applicant
- Maskery, M., “Car Auction Reaches Into Space,” Automotive News, Dialog File 16, Accession No. 03482064, Nov. 25, 1991, p. 6.Applicant
- Nimmer, R., “Electronic Contracting: Legal Issues,” 14 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 211 (1996).Applicant
- Pelline, J., “Travelers Bidding On Airline Tickets: SF Firm Offers Chance For Cut-Rate Fares,” The San Francisco Chronicle, Aug. 19, 1991, Section A4.Applicant
- Ritter, J., “Scope Of The Uniform Commercial Code: Computer Contracting Cases And Electronic Commerical Practices,” 45 Bus. Law. 2533, Aug. 1990.Applicant
- Schmitz, T., “California Computer Auctions—No Boon For Bargain Hunters,” Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, Sep. 13, 1993, Dialog File 609, Accession No. 2096205.Applicant
- Schrage, M., “An Experiment In Economic Theory: Labs Testing Real Markets,” The Los Angeles Times, Nov. 26, 1989, Section B1.Applicant
- Speidel, R., et al., “Impact Of Electronic Contracting On Contract Formation Under Revised UCC Article 2, Sales,” C878 ALI-ABA 335, Dec. 9, 1993.Applicant
- Whitmore, S., “Business On The Net: The New Gold Rush,” PC Week, vol. 12, No. 43, p. 106, Oct. 30, 1995.Applicant
- Johnson et al., “Automated Double Oral Auctions Using IBM PC Network”, Association for Computing Machinery, CSC '86 Cincinnati Proceedings, p. 507, date Feb. 1986.Applicant
- Ken Koepper, “Room Inventory Auctioning: The Next CRS Generation”, Lodging, Jan. 1990, pp. 26-30.Applicant
- “Save the Earth Foundation: Internet Auction Online Rock and Roll Art Auction Celebrating Earth Day is Declared Open to the World for One Month”, Business Wire, 1999; Apr. 24, 1995.Applicant
- “Computer Museum Holds an Internet Auction”, CMP 2000; May 9, 1994.Applicant
- “Save the Earth Foundation: The First Ever Autographed Concert Poster Auction via the Internet”, Business Wire, 1999; Apr. 17, 1995.Applicant
- Race, T., “The Debate Over Electronic Bidding Reaches Washington”, The NY Times, Oct. 6, 1991, p. 12, col. 1.Applicant
- Davies, S., “Treasury Auction to ‘Go Live’ with Computer Tenders”, Bond Buyer, v. 304, No. 2914, Apr. 29, 1993.Applicant
- Business Wire, “Computer Museum: The Computer Museum Brings Auction Block to Cyberspace”, Mar. 14, 1994.Applicant
- “EIT Computer Museum: First-Ever Internet Auction Produces Results for the Computer Museum”, Apr. 28, 1994.Applicant
- McCarthy, G., “The Electronic Auctioning of Servicing”, Mortgage Banking, pp. 95-98, Dec. 1994.Applicant
- “From Army Knives to Gold Coins, Collectors Attend ‘on-line’ Auctions”, Amy Sharp, Memphis Business Journal, v.8, No. 10 s1, p. 10, published Jul. 28, 1986.Applicant
- “Experimental Market Economics”, Vernon L. Smith et al., Sep. 1991, (Edited version in Dec. 1992 issues of Scientific American).Applicant
- Text by: Bernstein, J., 533 words-“Computer Museum Holds an Internet Auction,” Open Systems Today, May 9, 1994, No. 149, p. 86, Dialog File 647, Accession No. 01022908.Applicant
- Business Editors/Computer Writers, “Museum: First-ever ‘Internet’ Auction” Produces Results for the Computer Museum, Business Wire, Apr. 28, 1994, Dialog File 810, Accession No. 0401754.Applicant
- [Corrected Version Replacing Previous Announcement Due to Incorrect Contact Information] “Internet Online Rock And Roll Art Auction Celebrating Earth Day is Declared Open to the World for One Month,” Business Wire, Apr. 25, 1995, Dialog File 148, Accession No. 07809658.Applicant
- “Go for the Green—Country Club Members Scrambling to buy PGA West, Mission Hills Courses at Auction,” Los Angeles Times; Home Edition, coID 1, p. 3; Jun. 20, 1993.Applicant
- Feldman, Robert et al., “Auctions: Theory and applications,” International Monetary fund papers; v40n3, pp. 485-511; Sep. 1993.Applicant
- Garcia, Beatrice, “Fast-moving pace is not for the shy or the undecided,” Herald Real Estate; Miami Herald, Final Edition, p. 4G, May 5, 1991.Applicant
- Individual announces revolutionary “Dutch Auction” system for ads on news Page Web service Business Wire, p7241051, Jul. 24, 1995, Dialog File 148.Applicant
- “Acid Rain Auctions Is Successful,” American Metal Market, vol. 103 No. 69, Apr. 11, 1995.Applicant
- “An Analysis and Recommendation for the Terms of the Reclaim Trading Credit,” Report submitted to South Coast Air Quality Management District, Contract No. R-C93074, Apr. 27, 1993.Applicant
- “Business Plan for Intermart”, Intermart, Jul. 13, 1994.Applicant
- “Business Plan for Intermart,” Intermart, Aug. 18, 1994, p. 1-27.Applicant
- “Earth Day Ala Internet International Superstars Give Autographed Poster to Save the Earth—Silent Auction at San Francisco CA Artrock Gallery Will be Open to 26 Million Internet Users Apr. 22 Through May 21,” Business Wire, Feb. 10, 1995.Applicant
- “Earth Day on the Internet—Rockers and Performances Give Autographed Posters to Save the Earth,” Newswire, Mar. 14, 1995, PR News Wire Assoc., Inc.Applicant
- “Car Auctions Via Business TV To Debut Plans to Launch an Online Used Car Auction Service,” Network World, Jul. 25, 1994, ISSN:0887-7661.Applicant
- “Cassini Resource Exchange User's guide,” California Institute of Technology, Apr. 1993.Applicant
- “Farmers Plugging Into Electronic Cattle Ring,” The Financial Post (Toronto), Weekly Edition, Section 4, Jan. 1, 1994, p. S11.Applicant
- “FCC Will Allow Remote Electronic Bidding in Oct. 26 Narrowband PCS Auction,” Common Carrier Week, Oct. 10, 1994.Applicant
- “Here Come the Little Guys! Aucnet Inc.,” Tokyo Business Today, Toyo Keizai Inc., Feb. 1995, p. 5.Applicant
- “Old MacDonald Had A PC,” Canadian Business and Current Affairs Western Report, Sep. 13, 1993, p. 21, MicroMedia Limited ISSN:0831-8891.Applicant
- “Online Pollution Trading in California,” Newsbytes New Network, Apr. 14, 1995.Applicant
- “Preview Media and America Online Announce New Travel Services for America Online Subscribers,” PR Newswire, Feb. 7, 1995.Applicant
- “Report on the Feasibility and Economics of Establishing a Network For Electronic Sale of Sheep and Cattle Throughout Australia,” Agriculture Business Research Institute, Nov. 1983.Applicant
- “World's First Virtual Auction Set To Go,” The Ottawa Citizen, Business Section, Oct. 22, 1994, p. E2.Applicant
- Benson, B. et al., “The Impact of Provincial Marketing Boards On Price Relations and Pricing Dynamics in the North America Slaughter Hog Market,” Jul. 1994.Applicant
- Boelke, B. “Google Search RE: News Group-Collecting Stamps—WWW Auction Update,” Mar. 30, 1995.Applicant
- Brown, H., “Google Newsgroup RE: Lady Death and Shi Auction,” Oct. 26, 1994.Applicant
- Carlson, D. et al., “An Analysis of the Information and Report Requirements, Market Architectures, Operational and Regulatory Issues, and Regulatory Issues, and Derivative Instruments for Reclaim,” Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc., Contact No. R-C93074, Jul. 6, 1993.Applicant
- Cash, J., “Electronic Commerce,” Information Week, Dec. 26, 1994, Columnist Section, p. 60.Applicant
- Clarke, R., “The Strategic Intent of Online Trading Systems a Case Study in National Livestock Marketing,” Xamax Consultancy Ltd., Aug. 26.Applicant
- Clarke, R., “EDI Is But One Element of Electronic Commerce,” International EDI Conference, Nov. 6, 2001.Applicant
- Clemons, E., et al., “Evaluating the Prospects for Alternative Electronic Securities Markets,” The University of Pennsylvania and The University of London.Applicant
- Cohen, D., “Electronic Commerce”, Information Sciences Institute (ISI) Research Report, Oct. 1989, pp. 1-42.Applicant
- Connelly, M., “Ford Sets Electronic Auction: New Setup Will Sell Some Used Vehicles,” Automotive News, Apr. 10, 1995, Crain Communications, Inc.Applicant
- De Lafuente, Della, “A Virtual Paradise Online Users Can Find Businesses Offering Everything From Bar-Hopping To Wine Tours, Casinos To Camping;” Chicago Sun Times, Apr. 2, 1995.Applicant
- Gordon, M., “No Place Like the Auction: Auctions Continue to Grow and Become More Sophisticated in Meeting Dealer Needs,” Newsbyte News Network, Nov. 1, 1994.Applicant
- Griffiths, J., “Dealers Move Into Electronic Motor Trading,” Financial Times, Nov. 23, 1994, p. 13.Applicant
- Heng-Wah, C., “Google Newsgroup RE: Electronic Stamp Auction,” Jun. 17, 1994.Applicant
- Jaremko, G., “New Generation of Farmer Plugged into Computer Trading Centre,” Calgary Herald, Jul. 16, 1993, p. A1.Applicant
- Johnson, A., et al., “Multiple Unit Double Auction User's Manual,” California Institute of Technology, Nov. 1989.Applicant
- Johnston, T., “Where to Now For Calm?” Australian Farm Journal, Apr. 1994.Applicant
- Kambil, A., et al., “Information Technology. Competition and Market Transformations: Re-engineering the Dutch Flower Actions”, Jan. 1995.Applicant
- Kaplan, J., [Status Review and Plans], Jan. 5, 1995.Applicant
- Kaplan, J., [Summary of Our Meeting—Intermart Mosiac HTML—Interface Design], Dec. 7, 1994.Applicant
- Kaplan, S.J., “Intermart: The Virtual Shopper's Paradise,” Intermart , Dec. 7, 1993.Applicant
- Kapplin, S. et al., “An Analysis of Recent Rates of Return and of the Secondary Market for Public Real Estate Limited Partnerships,” The Journal of Real Estate Research, Fall 1986, p. 33-44.Applicant
- Lucianovic, WM., “Re: Stamp Auctionc Via Internet???” Apr. 19, 1995, Google Newsgroup: rec.collecting.stamps.Applicant
- Morton, I., “The Future Looks Used Car-Friendly,” Evening Standard, London, Nov. 24, 1994.Applicant
- Neo, B., “The Implementation of an Electronic Market For Pig Trading in Singapore,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Dec. 1992, vol. I, No. 5.Applicant
- O'Dell, J., “Automobiles,” The Los Angeles Times, Aug. 23, 1994.Applicant
- Omiya, E., “Google Newsgroup RE: Electronic Stamp Auction,” Jun. 19, 1994.Applicant
- Plott, C., Social Science Working Paper 783 “A Computerized Laboratory Market System & Research Support Systems for the Multiple Unit Double Auction,” Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences California Institute of Technology, Nov. 19, 2000.Applicant
- Porter, D., “Trading in a Pure Exchange Economy Without Auctioneer: An Experimental Approach,” California Institute of Technology, Mar. 1993.Applicant
- Rayport, J., “Managing in the Market Place,” 2002 Harvard Business Review, Nov./Dec. 1994, p. 141.Applicant
- Reck, M. et al., “Types of Electronic Auctions,” 1992, p. 236-243.Applicant
- Rockoff, T. et al., “Design of an Internet-Based System for Remote Dutch Auctions,” Internet Research Electronic Networking Application and Policy, 1995, vol. 5, No. 4, p. 10-16, MCB University Press.Applicant
- Siong, N.B. et al., “Online Trading at the Singapore Hog Auction Market (Ham),” Department of Computer Science, Australia National university, WWW.ANU.EDU.AU, Jul. 25, 1992, Xamax Consultancy Pry. Ltd., Canberra.Applicant
- Smith, P. et al., “Electronic Marketing of Fisheries Products,” Australia, ABARE, Mar. 1995.Applicant
- Smith, V. et al., “Competitive Market Institutions: Double Auctions vs Sealed Bid-Offer Auctions,” The American Economic Review, Mar. 1982, vol. 72, No. 1.Applicant
- Smith, V. et al., “On Nonbinding Price Controls in a Competitive Market,” The American Economic Review Jun. 1981, vol. 71, No. 3.Applicant
- Smith, V., “Auctions, Bidding and Contracting: Uses and Theory—An Experimental Comparison of Alternative Rules for Competitive Market Exchange,” New York University Press, Jul. 1980, pp. 30-334.Applicant
- Thomas, C.M., “57 Northeast Mitsubishi Dealers Try Out Computerized Auctions,” Automotive News, Sep. 19, 1994.Applicant
- Toner, A., “Hogs Sold in High-Tech Market Bidders Linked Through Satellite,” Omaha World-Herald Farmer Writer, Sep. 11, 1994.Applicant
- Wan, Jack, “Google Newsgroup RE: Electronic Stamp Auction,” Jun. 12, 1994.Applicant
- Warwick, M., “Inside Broadcast (business television)”, Communications International, Oct. 1, 1994, vol. 21, No. 10, ISSN:0305-2109.Applicant
- Williams, A.W., “Computerized Double-Auction Markets: Some Initial Experimental Results,” The Journal of Business, Jul. 1980, vol. 53, No. 3, Part I, The University of Chicago Press.Applicant
- Woodruff, M., “Electronic Auction,” Resources Technology, May 1985.Applicant
- Save The Earth Foundation: Internet Online Rock and Roll Art Auction Celebrating Earth Day Is Declared Open To The World For One Month, Business Wire (Apr. 24, 1995).Applicant
- Computer Museum Holds An Internet Auction, Open Systems Today (1994).Applicant
- Sharp, From Army Knives to Gold Coins, Collectors Attend ‘On-line’ Auctions, Memphis Business Journal (Jul. 28, 1986).Applicant
- http://search.sothebys.com/about/corporate/as—corphistory.html.Applicant
- Declaration of Choy Heng-Wah Regarding BidBroker Software—an Electronic Auction System filed in MercExchange, LLC v. eBayInc, et al., Case No. 2:01-CV-736 (E.D. Va) dated Mar. 8, 2002.Applicant
- Internet Providers Take Next Step Toward Electronic Commerce, Electronic Marketplace Report (Dec. 20, 1994), vol. 8, No. 24.Applicant
- Choy Heng-Wah, Re: Electronic Stamp Auction, rec.collecting.stamps (Jun. 17, 1994).Applicant
- Transcript from the videotaped deposition of Perry Blankley taken on Jun. 28, 2002.Applicant
- Transcript from the videotaped deposition of Jay Mintz taken on Jun. 27, 2002.Applicant
- McCarthy, The Electronic Auctioning of Servicing, Mortgage Banking (Dec. 1994) (p. 95-98).Applicant
- Lewis, Attention Shoppers: Internet is Open, New York Times (Aug. 12, 1994).Applicant
- Picard, Re: Bob's First Internet Stamp Auction!!, rec.collecting.stamps (Apr. 26, 1995).Applicant
- Wan and Heng-Wah, Electronic Stamp Auction, rec.collecting.stamps (Jun. 12-25, 1994).Applicant
- Boekle, WWW Auction Update, rec.collecting.stamps (Mar. 30, 1995).Applicant
- Brown, Lady Death & Shi Auction, rec.collecting.stamps (Oct. 26, 1994).Applicant
- Omiya, Electronic Stamp Auction, rec.collecting.stamps (Jun. 19, 1994).Applicant
- Rockoff, Design of an Internet-Based System for Remote Dutch Auctions, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy (1995), vol. 5, No. 4.Applicant
- Security Top Issue for Banks Planning to Surf the Internet, Financial Services Report (Apr. 12, 1995).Applicant
- Sandberg, System Planned for Shopping on the Internet, The Wall Street Journal (Sep. 13, 1994).Applicant
- Bank, Coming to the Cyberworld: Virtual Cash, Buffalo News (Mar. 15, 1995).Applicant
- Sirbu, Internet Billing Service Design and Prototype Implementation.Applicant
- The Quick Tour: A Summary of Approaches, Edventure Holdings Inc. (Jan. 24, 1995), vol. 95, No. 1.Applicant
- The Computer Museum Brings Auction Block to Cyberspace in First Internet Auction, Business Wire (Mar. 14, 1994).Applicant
- First-Ever Internet Auction Produces Results for the Computer Museum, Business Wire (Apr. 28, 1994).Applicant
- Lucianovic, Stamp Auction Via Internet?, rec.collecting.stamps (Apr. 21, 1995).Applicant
- Wilson, Gallery Hopping On-Line, International Herald Tribune (Oct. 29, 1994).Applicant
- J. King, Digitized Art Gallery Paints Retail's Future, Computerworld (Nov. 28, 1994).Applicant
- DVD containing NBC Today Show dated Sep. 1, 1994 (video and transcript), Edwin Newman's Honicorp (Nahan) Presentation, 1992 (video and transcript).Applicant
- Traub, MTG: All Editions Rare and Uncommon Auction , rec.games.deckmaster (May 9, 1994).Applicant
- Traub, M:tG Auction (winding down)—Update No. 77, rec.games.deckmaster (Jan. 24, 1995).Applicant
- Lehman, Lego Sale: Auczilla is here, rec.toys.lego (Feb. 26, 1995).Applicant
- Yin, 2 Dark Boxes for auction on WWW, rec.games.trading-cards.marketplace (May 29, 1995).Applicant
- Yin, An Automated Auction Engine for the WWW, comp.infosystems.www.announce) (Jun. 6, 1995).Applicant
- Lewis, Bits & Bytes, Business Week (Dec. 5, 1994).Applicant