US 7,639,841 B2Grant

System and method for on-road detection of a vehicle using knowledge fusion

Issue Date:2009-12-29

•46 Claims

•5 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

The present invention is directed to a system and method for on-road vehicle detection. A video sequence is received that is comprised of a plurality of image frames. A potential vehicle appearance is identified in an image frame. Known vehicle appearance information and scene geometry information are used to formulate initial hypotheses about vehicle appearance. The potential vehicle appearance is tracked over multiple successive image frames. Potential motion trajectories for the potential vehicle appearance are identified over the multiple image frames. Knowledge fusion of appearance, scene geometry and motion information models are applied to each image frame containing the trajectories. A confidence score is calculated for each trajectory. A trajectory with a high confidence score is determined to represent a vehicle appearance.

Metadata

Assignees

Siemens Corporation
Siemens VDO Automotive AG

Inventors

Ying Zhu
Dorin Comaniciu
Martin Pellkofer
Thorsten Köhler

Application Information

Application Number:US 11/311,500

Filing Date:2005-12-19

Priority Date:2004-12-21

Art Unit:2624

Classifications

IPC:

G06K9/62G06K9/46H04N7/18G05D1/00G01C22/00G06F17/10

Patent Drawings (5 sheets)

Description

Cross Reference to Related Application

[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/637,804 filed on Dec. 21, 2004, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Field of the Invention

[0002] The present invention is directed to a system and method for vehicle detection, and more particularly, to a system and method for on-road vehicle detection using knowledge fusion.

Background of the Invention

[0003] With the decreasing cost of optical sensors and increasing computing power of microprocessors, vision-based systems have been widely accepted as an integral part of the feasible solutions to driver assistance. The ability of detecting other vehicles on the road is essential to sensing and interpreting driving environments, which enables important functions like adaptive cruise control and pre-crash sensing. Vehicle detection requires effective vision algorithms that can distinguish vehicles from complex road scenes accurately. A great challenge comes from the large variety of vehicle appearance as well as different scenarios of driving environments. Vehicles vary in size, shape and appearance, which lead to considerable amount of variance in the class of vehicle images. Illumination changes in outdoor environments introduce additional variation in vehicle appearance. Meanwhile, unpredictable traffic situations create a wide range of non-stationary backgrounds with complex clutters. Moreover, high degrees of reliability and fast processing are required for driver assistance tasks, which also increase the difficulty of the task.

[0004] Known vision techniques have been used in vehicle detection. A number of approaches use empirical knowledge about vehicle appearance, such as symmetry, horizontal and vertical occluding edges around vehicle boundaries to detect the rear-view appearance of vehicles. These methods are computationally efficient but lack robustness because the parameters (e.g., thresholds) involved in edge detection and hypothesis generation are sensitive to lighting conditions and the dynamic range in image acquisition. To achieve reliable vehicle detection, several appearance-based methods exploit machine learning and pattern classification techniques to obtain elaborated classifiers that separate the vehicle class from other image patterns. Bayesian classifiers have also been used for classification in which a mixture of Gaussian filters and histograms were used to model the class distribution of vehicles and non-vehicles. Another method uses neural network classifiers that are trained on image features obtained from local orientation coding. Still other methods use Support Vector Machines (SVMs) that are trained on wavelet features.

[0005] Many of the methods mentioned above use partial knowledge for vehicle detection. For example, appearance-based methods mainly utilize the knowledge about vehicle and non-vehicle appearance, while motion-based detectors focus on the knowledge about relative vehicle motion. To make a detection system reliable, all the available knowledge should be utilized in a principled manner. There is a need for a vehicle detection system which is capable of fusing multiple sources of data over multiple image frames in order to more consistently and more accurately detect a vehicle.

Summary of the Invention

[0006] The present invention is directed to a system and method for on-road vehicle detection. A video sequence is received that is comprised of a plurality of image frames. A potential vehicle appearance is identified in an image frame. Known vehicle appearance information and scene geometry information are used to formulate initial hypotheses about vehicle appearance. The potential vehicle appearance is tracked over multiple successive image frames. Potential motion trajectories for the potential vehicle appearance are identified over the multiple image frames. Knowledge fusion of appearance, scene geometry and motion information models are applied to each image frame containing the trajectories. A confidence score is calculated for each trajectory. A trajectory with a high confidence score is determined to represent a vehicle appearance.

Brief Description of the Drawing

[0007] Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below in more detail, wherein like reference numerals indicate like elements, with reference to the accompanying drawings:

[0008] FIG. 1 is a system block diagram of a system for detecting preceding vehicles in accordance with the present invention;

[0009] FIG. 2 illustrates an example of appearance trajectories in accordance with the present invention;

[0010] FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an integrated framework for knowledge fusion in accordance with the present invention;

[0011] FIG. 4 shows examples of vehicle and non-vehicle training samples in accordance with the present invention;

[0012] FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a geometry constraint on appearance size and location in accordance with the present invention;

[0013] FIGS. 6a and 6b illustrate empirical error rates of car classifier and truck classifier in accordance with the present invention; and

[0014] FIG. 7 illustrates examples of vehicle detection results in accordance with the present invention.

Detailed Description

[0015] The present invention is directed to an integrated framework for on-road vehicle detection that uses knowledge fusion of appearance, scene geometry and vehicle motion. FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a system for implementing the present invention. A camera 102 is used to capture images of a road and its surroundings. As would be expected with a typical road image, the image includes background images, such as buildings, trees, and houses, and vehicles driving on the road. The images are communicated to a processor 104 which analyzes the image intensity and image motion to detect vehicles in front of the ego-vehicle.

[0016] Appearance, geometry and motion information are fused over multiple image frames. The knowledge of vehicle/non-vehicle appearance, scene geometry and vehicle motion is utilized through prior models obtained by learning, probabilistic modeling and estimation algorithms. The prior models are stored in database 108. Once a vehicle is identified at a sufficient confidence level, the vehicle is identified via an output device 106. The output device 106 provides an output signal which communicates to the user or following modules the presence of the vehicle as well as its location and size within an image frame. The output signal may be an audible signal or other type of warning signal. The output device 106 may also include a display for viewing the detected vehicles. The display provides a view of the images taken by the camera 102 which are then enhanced to indicate vehicles that have been detected and which are being tracked. The detection of a vehicle can also be incorporated with other vehicle features such as automatic cruise control and collision avoidance systems.

[0017] On-road vehicle detection is different than detecting vehicles in still images. In an on-board vision system, preceding vehicles appear in multiple image frames consistently. The information of vehicle appearance, vehicle motion as well as scene geometry can be exploited jointly to ensure robust and reliable detection. Appearance information provides strong discrimination for distinguishing vehicles from non-vehicles. Motion information has the ability of associating vehicle appearance over time. With temporal data association, detection becomes more robust against isolated errors made by appearance detectors. The knowledge about scene geometry induces strong constraints on where a vehicle on the road would appear on the image plane. Incorporating geometry information into detection can reduce certain errors such as detecting vehicles in the sky or on a tree.

[0018] In accordance with the present invention, it is important to detect consistent vehicle appearance over multiple image frames. If {I₁,I₂, . . . , I_m} denotes m consecutive image frames, and (x_k,s_k) is the vehicle location (x_k=[x,y]_k′) and size (s_k) in the k-th frame, and I_k(x_k,s_k) as the image patch of size s_kat location x_kof the k-th frame (k=1, . . . , m). Essentially, {(x₁,s₁), . . . , (x_m,s_m)} defines a trajectory of vehicle appearance on the image plane. Given the observation of m consecutive image frames {I_k}_k=1^mand the knowledge of scene geometry, the likelihood of consistent appearance of an on-road vehicle on the image plane is expressed as

[0019]

\begin{matrix} p_{m} ((x_{1}, s_{1}), \dots (x_{m}, s_{m}) | I_{1}, \dots, I_{m}) \cdot \prod_{k = 1}^{m} p_{g} ((x_{k}, s_{k}) | scene geometry) \cdot \prod_{k = 1}^{m} P_{a} (I_{k} (x_{k}, s_{k}) \in vehicle) & (1) \end{matrix}

[0020] The first term p_m((x₁,s₁), . . . (x_m,s_m)|I₁, . . . , I_m) defines the likelihood of the appearance of the trajectory {(x_l,s₁), . . . , (x_m,s_m)} being consistent. The subscript m is used in the notation because this term incorporates motion information to determine temporal association of object appearance. The second term,

[0021]

\prod_{k = 1}^{m} p_{g} ((x_{k}, s_{k}) |

scene geometry) defines the likelihood of an on-road vehicle appearing on an admissible trajectory {(x₁,s₁, ), . . . , (x_m,s_m))} given the knowledge of scene geometry. The subscript g is used in the notation to indicate geometry information being exploited. The third term

[0022]

\prod_{k = 1}^{m} P_{a} (I_{k} (x_{k}, s_{k}) \in vehicle)

vehicle) defines the probability that the image patches I_k(x_k,s_k) (k=1, . . . , m) belong to the vehicle class, where the subscript a in the notation indicates the use of appearance information.

[0023] An example of appearance trajectories is illustrated in FIG. 2. A vehicle 202 is shown over time in a number of subsequent image frames 208, 210, 212 (i.e., time t, t+1, t+2). In each subsequent image frame, the possible appearance trajectories 204, 206 are shown. As more information about the vehicle is obtained, the correct trajectory can be identified. Over time the possible appearance trajectories are maintained and the probability of their likelihood is calculated. If the probability falls below a predetermined threshold, the trajectory is dropped from consideration.

[0024] Using the above probabilistic formulation, an integrated framework of knowledge fusion in accordance with the present invention is shown in FIG. 3. The prior models of appearance P_a308, geometry p_g310 and motion p_m312 are used to fuse and propagate information over time. To detect on-road vehicles in an image sequence, the appearance and geometry models P_a, p_gare used to generate initial hypotheses of vehicle appearance. Using the motion model p_m, the initial hypotheses are tracked over successive image frames 302-306. Consequently, the initial hypotheses evolve into hypotheses of vehicle appearance trajectories.

[0025] After a number of image frames, the likelihood of consistent appearance being a vehicle is compared with a threshold to decide whether the appearance trajectory represents a vehicle or non-vehicle. In accordance with the present invention, strong geometry and motion constraints are exploited to improve the reliability of the over-all detection system. Note that the use of motion information from multiple frames causes delayed decisions. However, in practice, a small number of frames can be used (e.g., <10 frames) to avoid significant delay.

[0026] In accordance with the present invention, prior knowledge of vehicle and non-vehicle appearance provides discriminant information for separating the vehicle class from the non-vehicle class. A machine learning algorithm, AdaBoost, is adopted to learn appearance priors from vehicle and non-vehicle examples. The boosting technique has been shown to be very effective in learning binary classifiers for object detection. Examples of vehicle and non-vehicle training samples are shown in FIG. 4. Images 402-410 show training samples for vehicles and images 412-420 show training samples for non-vehicles.

[0027] The appearance model is obtained from image examples through learning. In general, any learning algorithm can be used as well to construct an appearance model from image examples. Here, the Adaboost algorithm is used as an example of learning an appearance model from image examples. An image sample, denoted by I and its class label by l(lε{+1.−1)}. The method finds a highly accurate classifier H(I) by combining many classifiers {h_j,(I)} with weak performance.

[0028]

\begin{matrix} H (I) = sign (f (I)); f (I) = \sum_{j} α_{j} h_{j} (I) & (2) \end{matrix}

[0029] where h_j(I)ε(+1,−1)

[0030] Given a set of labeled training samples {(I_i,l_i)}, the Adaboost algorithm chooses {α_j} by minimizing an exponential loss function Σ_iexp(−l_iΣ_jh_j(I_i)) which is determined by the classification error on the training set. Simple image features are used to define weak classifiers. Feature values are thresholded to produce weak hypotheses. The optimal thresholds are automatically determined by the boosting algorithm. An additional procedure of joint optimization on {α_j} is performed to further reduce the error rate of the final classifier. In accordance with the present invention, separate classifiers are used to classify cars and trucks from the non-vehicle class. Vehicle samples collected from traffic videos captured in various driving scenarios are used. Non-vehicle samples collected from image regions containing background clutters and extended through the bootstrap procedure are also used.

[0031] A posteriori probability can be derived from the classifier response f(I).

[0032]

\begin{matrix} P_{a} (l = 1 | I) = \frac{ⅇ^{f (I)}}{ⅇ^{- f (I)} + ⅇ^{f (I)}} & (3) \end{matrix}

Class labels for vehicles and non-vehicles are +1 and −1 respectively. The probability term P_ain (I) can be evaluated as

[0033]

\begin{matrix} \prod_{k = 1}^{m} P_{a} (I_{k} (x_{k}, s_{k}) \in vehicle) = \prod_{k = 1}^{m} \frac{ⅇ^{f (I_{k} (x_{k}, s_{k}))}}{ⅇ^{- f (I_{k} (x_{k}, s_{k}))} + ⅇ^{f (I_{k} (x_{k}, s_{k}))}} & (4) \end{matrix}

In general, other learning methods such as Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks can be adopted to obtain appearance models, as long as a proper probabilistic model P_a(l=1|I) is derived by these methods.

[0034] Scene context plays an important role in improving the reliability of a vehicle detection system. Strong constraints on where vehicles are likely to appear can be inferred from the knowledge of scene geometry. Through perspective projection, points in the 3D world p_ware mapped to points on the 2D image plane p_im.
p_im=Tp_w
T=T_internalT_perspectiveT_external (5)

[0035] The entire image formation process comprises perspective projection and transformation induced by internal and external camera calibration. Assuming that a vehicle is on a flat road plane, vehicle size in the world s_wis known and the internal and external camera parameters θ_internalθ_externalare available. Given the location of vehicle appearance on the image plane x_im, the size s_imof the vehicle appearance on the image plane can be easily determined as a function of x_imand θ={s_w, θ_internal, θ_external}.
s_im=g(x_im,s_w, θ_internal, θ_external) (6)

[0036] In practice, the flat road assumption may be violated, vehicles vary in size and the camera calibration may not be very accurate. To address such variance of the parameters, a probability model is used to characterize the geometry constraint. The conditional distribution of vehicle size s_imon the image plane given its location can be modeled by a normal distribution N(•; μ,σ²) with mean μ=g(x_im,s_w, θ_internal, θ_external) and variance σ²determined by the variance of the parameter set θ={s_w, θ_internal, θ_external} and the deviation of the road surface from the planar assumption.
p(s_im|x_im)=N(s_im; μ,σ²) μ=g(x_im, θ) (7)
σ²=σ²(x_im, σ_θ²)
Given the geometry constraint, the likelihood of a vehicle being present at location x_imwith size s_imon the image plane is given by
p(x_im,s_im)=p(x_im)p(s_im|x_im)=c·N(s_im; g(x_im, θ), σ²(x_im, σ_θ²)) (8)
where c is a constant.
A uniform distribution is assumed for the prior probability of the vehicle location x_im. Consequently, the geometry model p_gin (1) is formulated as

[0037]

\begin{matrix} \prod_{k = 1}^{m} p_{g} (x_{k}, s_{k}) | scene geometry) = κ \prod_{k = 1}^{m} N (\begin{matrix} s_{k}; g (x_{k}, θ), \\ σ^{2} (x_{k}, θ) \end{matrix}) & (9) \end{matrix}

Information about the road geometry can be used to refine the distribution model of x_im. An example of a geometry constraint on size and location is illustrated in FIG. 5. The location and the size of vehicle appearance in the image plane is dependent. The size of a vehicle appearance in the image plane is constrained given the image location of the vehicle, and vice versa For instance, if a vehicle is observed in the lower portion of the image frame, its appearance is larger than a vehicle that appears in the upper portion of the image.

[0038] To derive the motion model in (1), the Markov property of vehicles in the image plane is assumed, i.e., given the vehicle location and size (x_t,s_t) at time t, future location and size (x_t+k,s_t+k) (k≧1) are independent of past observations {I₁, . . . , I_t−1}. In accordance with this assumption, the motion model p_mused in the fusion framework (1) can be written as

[0039]

\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} p_{m} (\begin{matrix} (x_{1}, s_{1}), \dots, \\ \begin{matrix} (x_{m}, s_{m}) \\ | I_{1}, \dots, \\ I_{m} \end{matrix} \end{matrix}) = p_{m} (\begin{matrix} (x_{1}, s_{1}) \\ | I_{1} \end{matrix}) \prod_{k = 1}^{m - 1} p_{m} (\begin{matrix} (x_{k + 1}, s_{k + 1}) \\ | (x_{k}, s_{k}), \\ I_{k + 1}, I_{k} \end{matrix}) \\ = c^{'} \cdot \prod_{k = 1}^{m - 1} p_{m} ((x_{k + 1}, s_{k + 1}) | (x_{k}, s_{k}), I_{k + 1} I_{k}) \end{matrix} & (10) \end{matrix}

where c′ is a constant.

[0040] The product term p_m((x_k+1,s_k+1)|(x_k,s_k),I_k+1,I_k) represents the likelihood of a vehicle moving from location x_k, size s_kin frame I_kto location X_k+1, size s_k+1in frame I_k+1given that {I_k, I_k+1} are observed.

[0041] To solve the likelihood term p_m((x_k+1,s_k+1)|(x_k,s_k), I_k+1, i_k) the motion estimation algorithm is extended to estimate a special form of affine motion with translation u=[u_x, u_y] and scaling parameter a. Under the brightness consistency assumption,
I_k(x)=I_k+1(ax+u) x=[x,y]′; u=[u_x,u_y]′ (11)
the optical flow equation is generalized to
[∇_x^TI_k(x)·x]α+∂_xI_k(x)u_x+∂_yI_k(x)u_y=[∇_x^TI_k(x)·x]−∂_tI_k(x) (12)
where ∇_xI_k(x)=[∂_xI(x), ∂_yI(x)]′ and ∂_tI(x) are spatial and temporal derivatives at image location x. An unbiased estimation of scaling and translation vector can be obtained by solving a least square problem.

[0042]

\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {[a, u_{x}, u_{y}]}_{k}^{'} = E {{[a, u_{x}, u_{y}]}_{k}^{'} | x_{k}, I_{k + 1}, I_{k}]} \\ = {(A_{k}^{'} A_{k})}^{- 1} A_{k}^{'} B_{k} \end{matrix} A_{k} = [\begin{matrix} ▽_{x}^{T} I_{k} (x_{1}) \cdot x_{1} & \partial_{x} I_{k} (x_{1}) & \partial_{y} I_{k} (x_{1}) \\ ⋮ & ⋮ & ⋮ \\ ▽_{x}^{T} I_{k} (x_{N}) \cdot x_{N} & \partial_{x} I_{k} (x_{N}) & \partial_{y} I_{k} (x_{N}) \end{matrix}] B_{k} = {[▽_{k} I_{k} (x_{1}), \dots, ▽_{x} I_{k} (x_{N})]}^{'} & (13) \end{matrix}

where N is the number of pixels in the local image region used for estimation. The covariance of the unbiased estimate [a,u_x,u_y]′_kcan be derived as follows.

[0043]

\begin{matrix} Cov {{[a, u_{x}, u_{y}]}_{k}^{'}} = {{\hat{σ}}^{2} (A_{k}^{'} A_{k})}^{- 1} {\hat{σ}}^{2} = \frac{1}{N - 3} { A_{k} \cdot {[a, u_{x}, u_{y}]}_{k}^{'} - B_{k} }^{2} & (14) \end{matrix}

Given the vehicle location x_kand size s_kin the k-th frame as well as the observed image frames {I_k,I_k+1}, the vehicle location and size in the k-th frame can be estimated through the affine transform

[0044]

\begin{matrix} {[x_{k + 1}, y_{k + 1}, s_{k + 1}]}^{'} = C_{k} \cdot {[a, u_{x}, u_{y}]}_{k}^{'} C_{k} = [\begin{matrix} x_{k} & 1 & 0 \\ y_{k} & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \end{matrix}] & (15) \\ E {{[x_{k + 1}, y_{k + 1}, s_{k + 1}]}^{'}} = C_{k} \cdot E {{[a, u_{x}, u_{y}]}_{k}^{'}}^{} Cov {{[x_{k + 1}, y_{k + 1}, s_{k + 1}]}^{'}} = C_{k} \cdot Cov {{[a, u_{x}, u_{y}]}_{k}^{'}} \cdot {C_{k}^{'}}^{} & (16) \end{matrix}

Given the unbiased estimate [a,u_x,u_y]′_kand its covariance Cov{[a,u_x,u_y]′_k} obtained by the motion estimation algorithm, the likelihood term p_m(x_k+1|x_k,I_k,I_k−1) can be modeled as a multivariate normal distribution.

[0045]

\begin{matrix} p_{m} ((x_{k + 1}, s_{k + 1}) \langle (x_{k}, s_{k}), I_{k + 1}, I_{k}) = N ((x_{k + 1}, s_{k + 1}); μ_{k + 1}, \sum_{k + 1}) μ_{k + 1} = C_{k} \cdot {[a, u_{x}, u_{y}]}_{k}^{'} \sum_{k + 1} = C_{k} \cdot Cov {{[a, u_{x}, u_{y}]}_{k}^{'} \cdot C_{k}^{'} & (17) \end{matrix}

Consequently, the motion model (10) is expressed as

[0046]

\begin{matrix} p_{m} ((x_{1}, s_{1}), \dots, (x_{m}, s_{m}) \langle I_{1}, \dots, I_{m}) = κ \prod_{k = 1}^{m - 1} N ((x_{k + 1}, s_{k + 1}); μ_{k + 1}, \sum_{k + 1}) & (18) \end{matrix}

[0047] In accordance with the present invention, the prior models of appearance, geometry and motion have been described as well as method for obtaining these prior models. Using these prior models, knowledge fusion is performed on the image frame level. Initially, appearance and geometry models are used to generate hypotheses of vehicle appearance. From equations (4) and (9), the likelihood of a vehicle appearance, i.e., length-1 trajectory, is given by
l₁α p_g((x₁,s₁)|scene geometry)·P_a(I₁(x₁,s₁)εvehicle (19)
The initial hypotheses are pruned and trajectories of high likelihood are kept. Hypotheses are updated sequentially over time using appearance, geometry and motion information.
l_k+1α l_k·p_m((x_k+1,s_k+1)|(x_k,s_k),I_k+1,I_k)·p_g((x_k+1,s_k+1)|scene geometry)·P_a(I_k+1(x₊₁,s₊₁)εvehicle) (20)
where the trajectories are extended into a new image frame I_k+1.
(x_k+1,s_k+1)=argmax_(x,s)p_m((x,s)|(x_k,s_k), I₊₁,I_k)·p_g((x,s)|scene geometry)·P_a(I_k+1(x_k+1,s_k+1)εvehicle) (21)

[0048] For computational efficiency, trajectories with low likelihood values are terminated during the fusion process. After the information is accumulated over a number of frames, decisions are made by thresholding the likelihood values.

[0049]

\begin{matrix} {(x_{1}, s_{1}), \dots, (x_{m}, s_{m})} {\begin{matrix} ε vehicle & l_{m} > τ \\ ε non - vehicle & otherwise \end{matrix} & (22) \end{matrix}

[0050] In accordance with the present invention, an example of how the method may be used will now be described. In the current example, the camera is calibrated. Examples of rear view images of cars and trucks are collected. Separate classifiers are trained to detect cars and trucks. Classifier performance is shown in FIG. 6. If 150 simple features are used, the composite error rate (i.e., miss detection rate plus false alarm rate) of the car classifier is approximately 10⁻⁴on the training data set, and the composite error of the truck classifier is approximately 10⁻³on the training data set. The number shows that truck appearance is more difficult to classify compared to cars due to different degrees of within-class variance. The number of frames used in fusion can be adjusted according to requirements on response time. During testing, a large degree of performance improvement was observed by fusing appearance, geometry and motion information. FIG. 7 shows examples of false detection eliminated by the fusion approach.

[0051] Having described embodiments for a system and method for detecting vehicles using a knowledge fusion framework, it is noted that modifications and variations can be made by persons skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that changes may be made in the particular embodiments of the invention disclosed which are within the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Having thus described the invention with the details and particularity required by the patent laws, what is claimed and desired protected by Letters Patent is set forth in the appended claims.

Claims

We claim:

1. A method for on-road vehicle detection comprising the steps of:

receiving a video sequence comprised of a plurality of image frames;

identifying a potential vehicle appearance in an image frame;

using known vehicle appearance information and scene geometry information to formulate initial hypotheses about vehicle appearance;

tracking the potential vehicle appearance over multiple successive image frames;

identifying potential motion trajectories for the potential vehicle appearance over the multiple image frames;

applying knowledge fusion by assigning a confidence score to each trajectory of vehicle appearance, where the confidence score is defined as the product of probabilities obtained from appearance model, scene geometry model and motion model determined for each image frame containing the trajectories; and

determining that a trajectory with a high confidence score represents a vehicle appearance.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein a potential vehicle appearance is determined by hypothesis testing using a probability model.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the probability model is defined as the probability that a vehicle appears in an observed image patch.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the probability model is obtained from known vehicle and non-vehicle training samples.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein the probability model is formed by using a set of image features as weak classifiers that characterize various vehicle aspects.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the scene geometry models impose strong constraints on a location of a vehicle in a given image frame.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the scene geometry model is a probability model defined as the joint probability distribution function of vehicle location and vehicle size inside an image frame.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the joint probability distribution function of vehicle location and vehicle size in a given image frame is obtained as the product of probability distribution function of vehicle location in a give image frame and conditional probability distribution function of vehicle size given its location in a given image frame.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the probability distribution function of vehicle location in a give image frame is a uniform distribution.

10. The method of claim 7 wherein the vehicle size in a given image frame is a function of vehicle location in a given image frame, vehicle size in the world coordinate system, and elevation of the road surface where the vehicle touches the road.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein given a vehicle location in a given image frame, the vehicle size in the world coordinate system is described as a random variable with a normal distribution, and elevation of the road surface is described as a random variable with a normal distribution.

12. The method of claim 8 wherein the conditional probability distribution function of vehicle size given its location in a given image frame is defined as a normal distribution.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein mean and covariance for the normal distribution are derived from mean and covariance of vehicle size in the world coordinate system and mean and covariance of elevation of the road surface where the vehicle touches the road.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein the motion models impose constraints on the movement of the potential vehicle appearance in a subsequent frame.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein the motion model is defined as conditional probability distribution function of vehicle location and vehicle size in an image frame given its location and size in the previous image frame and the two consecutive image frames.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein the conditional probability of the conditional probability distribution function of vehicle location and vehicle size is a normal distribution.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein mean of the normal distribution is an unbiased estimate of vehicle location and size given its location and size in a previous image frame and two consecutive image frames.

18. The method of claim 16 wherein covariance of the normal distribution is the covariance of an unbiased estimate of the vehicle location and size given its location and size in a previous image frame and two consecutive image frames.

19. The method of claim 1 wherein the video sequence is received from a camera mounted to a vehicle.

20. The method of claim 1 wherein trajectories of vehicle appearance are extended into each subsequent image frames using estimated image motion of the vehicle appearance.

21. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of applying knowledge fusion is applied to trajectories of vehicle appearance in each image frame of the video sequence.

22. The method of claim 1 wherein the appearance, scene geometry and motion information models are used to update the confidence score for each trajectory in each subsequent image frame in the video sequence.

23. The method of claim 1 wherein if the confidence score for a particular trajectory falls below a predetermined value, the particular trajectory is not tracked in subsequent image frames.

24. A system for on-road vehicle detection comprises:

at least one camera for capturing a video sequence of image frames of background dynamics;

a processor associated with the at least one camera, the processor performing the following steps:

i). identifying a potential vehicle appearance in an image frame;

ii). using known vehicle appearance information and scene geometry information to formulate initial hypotheses about vehicle appearance;

iii). tracking the potential vehicle appearance over multiple successive image frames;

iv). identifying potential motion trajectories for the potential vehicle appearance over the multiple image frames;

v). applying knowledge fusion by assigning a confidence score to each trajectory of vehicle appearance, where the confidence score is defined as the product of probabilities obtained from appearance model, scene geometry model and motion model determined for each image frame containing the trajectories;

and

vi). determining that a trajectory with a high confidence score represents a vehicle appearance.

25. The system of claim 24 wherein a potential vehicle appearance is determined by hypothesis testing using a probability model.

26. The system of claim 25 wherein the probability model is defined as the probability that a vehicle appears in an observed image patch.

27. The system of claim 25 wherein the probability model is obtained from known vehicle and non-vehicle training samples.

28. The system of claim 25 wherein the probability model is formed by using a set of image features as weak classifiers that characterize various vehicle aspects.

29. The system of claim 24 wherein the scene geometry models impose strong constraints on a location of a vehicle in a given image frame.

30. The system of claim 29 wherein the scene geometry model is a probability model defined as the joint probability distribution function of vehicle location and vehicle size inside an image frame.

31. The system of claim 30 wherein the joint probability distribution function of vehicle location and vehicle size in a given image frame is obtained as the product of probability distribution function of vehicle location in a give image frame and conditional probability distribution function of vehicle size given its location in a given image frame.

32. The system of claim 31 wherein the probability distribution function of vehicle location in a give image frame is a uniform distribution.

33. The system of claim 31 wherein the vehicle size in a given image frame is a function of vehicle location in a given image frame, vehicle size in the world coordinate system, and elevation of the road surface where the vehicle touches the road.

34. The system of claim 33 wherein given vehicle location in a given image frame, the vehicle size in the world coordinate system is described as a random variable with a normal distribution, and elevation of the road surface is described as a random variable with a normal distribution.

35. The system of claim 31 wherein the conditional probability distribution function of vehicle size given its location in a given image frame is defined as a normal distribution.

36. The system of claim 35 wherein mean and covariance for the normal distribution are derived from mean and covariance of vehicle size in the world coordinate system and mean and covariance of elevation of the road surface where the vehicle touches the road.

37. The system of claim 24 wherein the motion models impose constraints on the movement of the potential vehicle appearance in a subsequent frame.

38. The system of claim 37 wherein the motion model is defined as conditional probability distribution function of vehicle location and vehicle size in an image frame given its location and size in the previous image frame and the two consecutive image frames.

39. The system of claim 38 wherein the conditional probability distribution function of vehicle location and vehicle size is a normal distribution.

40. The system of claim 39 wherein mean of the normal distribution is an unbiased estimate of vehicle location and size given its location and size in a previous image frame and two consecutive image frames.

41. The system of claim 39 wherein covariance of the normal distribution is the covariance of an unbiased estimate of the vehicle location and size given its location and size in a previous image frame and two consecutive image frames.

42. The system of claim 24 the at least one camera is mounted to a vehicle.

43. The system of claim 24 wherein trajectories of vehicle appearance are extended into each subsequent image frames using estimated image motion of the vehicle appearance.

44. The system of claim 24 wherein the step of applying knowledge fusion is applied to trajectories of vehicle appearance in each image frame of the video sequence.

45. The system of claim 24, wherein the appearance, scene geometry and motion information models are used to update the confidence score for each trajectory in each subsequent image frame in the video sequence.

46. The system of claim 24 wherein if the confidence score for a particular trajectory falls below a predetermined value, the particular trajectory is not tracked in subsequent image frames.

Patent Citations (211)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US4739401(A)	1988-04-01	Sacks et al.	Examiner
US4868871(A)	1989-09-01	Watson, III	Examiner
US4926346(A)	1990-05-01	Yokoyama	Examiner
US4931937(A)	1990-06-01	Kakinami et al.	Examiner
US4969036(A)	1990-11-01	Bhanu et al.	Examiner
US4970653(A)	1990-11-01	Kenue	Examiner
US5036474(A)	1991-07-01	Bhanu et al.	Examiner
US5159557(A)	1992-10-01	Ogawa	Examiner
US5161632(A)	1992-11-01	Asayama	Examiner
US5233541(A)	1993-08-01	Corwin et al.	Examiner
US5253050(A)	1993-10-01	Karasudani	Examiner
US5369590(A)	1994-11-01	Karasudani	Examiner
US5373456(A)	1994-12-01	Ferkinhoff et al.	Examiner
US5390133(A)	1995-02-01	Sohie	Examiner
US5410346(A)	1995-04-01	Saneyoshi et al.	Examiner
US5434927(A)	1995-07-01	Brady et al.	Examiner
US5487116(A)	1996-01-01	Nakano et al.	Examiner
US5500904(A)	1996-03-01	Markandey et al.	Examiner
US5515448(A)	1996-05-01	Nishitani	Examiner
US5521633(A)	1996-05-01	Nakajima et al.	Examiner
US5530420(A)	1996-06-01	Tsuchiya et al.	Examiner
US5530771(A)	1996-06-01	Maekawa	Examiner
US5535144(A)	1996-07-01	Kise	Examiner
US5537511(A)	1996-07-01	DeAngelis et al.	Examiner
US5555312(A)	1996-09-01	Shima et al.	Examiner
US5555555(A)	1996-09-01	Sato et al.	Examiner
US5590217(A)	1996-12-01	Toyama	Examiner
US5592567(A)	1997-01-01	Kilger	Examiner
US5600731(A)	1997-02-01	Sezan et al.	Examiner
US5612686(A)	1997-03-01	Takano et al.	Examiner
US5617085(A)	1997-04-01	Tsutsumi et al.	Examiner
US5621645(A)	1997-04-01	Brady	Examiner
US5638116(A)	1997-06-01	Shimoura et al.	Examiner
US5742699(A)	1998-04-01	Adkins et al.	Examiner
US5761326(A)	1998-06-01	Brady et al.	Examiner
US5765116(A)	1998-06-01	Wilson-Jones et al.	Examiner
US5777690(A)	1998-07-01	Takeda et al.	Examiner
US5892855(A)	1999-04-01	Kakinami et al.	Examiner
US5910817(A)	1999-06-01	Ohashi et al.	Examiner
US5929785(A)	1999-07-01	Satonaka	Examiner
US5937078(A)	1999-08-01	Hyland et al.	Examiner
US5937079(A)	1999-08-01	Franke	Examiner
US5969755(A)	1999-10-01	Courtney	Examiner
US5991428(A)	1999-11-01	Taniguchi	Examiner
US6035053(A)	2000-03-01	Yoshioka et al.	Examiner
US6044166(A)	2000-03-01	Bassman et al.	Examiner
US6072889(A)	2000-06-01	Deaett et al.	Examiner
US6122597(A)	2000-09-01	Saneyoshi et al.	Examiner
US6141435(A)	2000-10-01	Naoi et al.	Examiner
US6185314(B1)	2001-02-01	Crabtree et al.	Examiner
US6263088(B1)	2001-07-01	Crabtree et al.	Examiner
US6285393(B1)	2001-09-01	Shimoura et al.	Examiner
US6298144(B1)	2001-10-01	Pucker et al.	Examiner
US6301542(B1)	2001-10-01	Kirchberger et al.	Examiner
US6327522(B1)	2001-12-01	Kojima et al.	Examiner
US6327536(B1)	2001-12-01	Tsuji et al.	Examiner
US6370261(B1)	2002-04-01	Hanawa	Examiner
US6380934(B1)	2002-04-01	Freeman et al.	Examiner
US6430303(B1)	2002-08-01	Naoi et al.	Examiner
US6445809(B1)	2002-09-01	Sasaki et al.	Examiner
US6466684(B1)	2002-10-01	Sasaki et al.	Examiner
US6477260(B1)	2002-11-01	Shimomura	Examiner
US6531959(B1)	2003-03-01	Nagaoka et al.	Examiner
US6542621(B1)	2003-04-01	Brill et al.	Examiner
US6549642(B1)	2003-04-01	Sakurai	Examiner
US6553130(B1)	2003-04-01	Lemelson et al.	Examiner
US6556692(B1)	2003-04-01	Gavrila	Examiner
US6570998(B1)	2003-05-01	Ohtsuka et al.	Examiner
US6590521(B1)	2003-07-01	Saka et al.	Examiner
US6590999(B1)	2003-07-01	Comaniciu et al.	Examiner
US6594583(B2)	2003-07-01	Ogura et al.	Examiner
US6597801(B1)	2003-07-01	Cham et al.	Examiner
US6597816(B1)	2003-07-01	Altunbasak et al.	Examiner
US6628835(B1)	2003-09-01	Brill et al.	Examiner
US6636257(B1)	2003-10-01	Harada et al.	Examiner
US6643387(B1)	2003-11-01	Sethuraman et al.	Examiner
US6683969(B1)	2004-01-01	Nishigaki et al.	Examiner
US6687577(B2)	2004-02-01	Strumolo	Examiner
US6694044(B1)	2004-02-01	Pavlovic et al.	Examiner
US6704621(B1)	2004-03-01	Stein et al.	Examiner
US6718259(B1)	2004-04-01	Khosla	Examiner
US6731204(B2)	2004-05-01	Lehmann	Examiner
US6731777(B1)	2004-05-01	Nishigaki et al.	Examiner
US6734787(B2)	2004-05-01	Ikeda	Examiner
US6737963(B2)	2004-05-01	Gutta et al.	Examiner
US6744380(B2)	2004-06-01	Imanishi et al.	Examiner
US6757571(B1)	2004-06-01	Toyama	Examiner
US6765480(B2)	2004-07-01	Tseng	Examiner
US6795014(B2)	2004-09-01	Cheong	Examiner
US6813370(B1)	2004-11-01	Arai	Examiner
US6826292(B1)	2004-11-01	Tao et al.	Examiner
US6842531(B2)	2005-01-01	Ohtsuka et al.	Examiner
US6845172(B2)	2005-01-01	Furusho	Examiner
US6847894(B1)	2005-01-01	Hasegawa	Examiner
US6853738(B1)	2005-02-01	Nishigaki et al.	Examiner
US6873912(B2)	2005-03-01	Shimomura	Examiner
US6879705(B1)	2005-04-01	Tao et al.	Examiner
US6879706(B2)	2005-04-01	Satoh et al.	Examiner
US6901152(B2)	2005-05-01	Lee et al.	Examiner
US6906620(B2)	2005-06-01	Nakai et al.	Examiner
US6937746(B2)	2005-08-01	Schwartz	Examiner
US6944317(B2)	2005-09-01	Pavlovic et al.	Examiner
US6954544(B2)	2005-10-01	Jepson et al.	Examiner
US6963657(B1)	2005-11-01	Nishigaki et al.	Examiner
US6963661(B1)	2005-11-01	Hattori et al.	Examiner
US6973201(B1)	2005-12-01	Colmenarez et al.	Examiner
US6990216(B2)	2006-01-01	Yamamura	Examiner
US6993159(B1)	2006-01-01	Ishii et al.	Examiner
US6999600(B2)	2006-02-01	Venetianer et al.	Examiner
US7034742(B2)	2006-04-01	Cong et al.	Examiner
US7035431(B2)	2006-04-01	Blake et al.	Examiner
US7038577(B2)	2006-05-01	Pawlicki et al.	Examiner
US7042389(B2)	2006-05-01	Shirai	Examiner
US7046822(B1)	2006-05-01	Knoeppel et al.	Examiner
US7068815(B2)	2006-06-01	Chang et al.	Examiner
US7069130(B2)	2006-06-01	Yopp	Examiner
US7072494(B2)	2006-07-01	Georgescu et al.	Examiner
US7088846(B2)	2006-08-01	Han et al.	Examiner
US7124027(B1)	2006-10-01	Ernst et al.	Examiner
US7127083(B2)	2006-10-01	Han et al.	Examiner
US7132933(B2)	2006-11-01	Nakai et al.	Examiner
US7132959(B2)	2006-11-01	Seabury et al.	Examiner
US7149327(B2)	2006-12-01	Okamoto et al.	Examiner
US7167578(B2)	2007-01-01	Blake et al.	Examiner
US7171023(B2)	2007-01-01	Kim et al.	Examiner
US7190809(B2)	2007-03-01	Gutta et al.	Examiner
US7221777(B2)	2007-05-01	Nagaoka et al.	Examiner
US7224735(B2)	2007-05-01	Porikli et al.	Examiner
US7248718(B2)	2007-07-01	Comaniciu et al.	Examiner
US7263209(B2)	2007-08-01	Camus et al.	Examiner
US7263472(B2)	2007-08-01	Porikli	Examiner
US7266454(B2)	2007-09-01	Takahama et al.	Examiner
US7274801(B2)	2007-09-01	Lee	Examiner
US7286707(B2)	2007-10-01	Liu et al.	Examiner
US7336803(B2)	2008-02-01	Mittal et al.	Examiner
US7352880(B2)	2008-04-01	Kim et al.	Examiner
US7356408(B2)	2008-04-01	Tsuchiya et al.	Examiner
US7386163(B2)	2008-06-01	Sabe et al.	Examiner
US7397929(B2)	2008-07-01	Nichani et al.	Examiner
US7409092(B2)	2008-08-01	Srinivasa	Examiner
US7433496(B2)	2008-10-01	Ishii et al.	Examiner
US7436980(B2)	2008-10-01	Sigal et al.	Examiner
US7450736(B2)	2008-11-01	Yang et al.	Examiner
US7463754(B2)	2008-12-01	Yang et al.	Examiner
US7466841(B2)	2008-12-01	Bahlmann et al.	Examiner
US7466842(B2)	2008-12-01	Tuzel et al.	Examiner
US7486802(B2)	2009-02-01	Hougen	Examiner
US7499571(B1)	2009-03-01	Han et al.	Examiner
US7519471(B2)	2009-04-01	Shibata et al.	Examiner
US7526101(B2)	2009-04-01	Avidan	Examiner
US7542835(B2)	2009-06-01	Takahama et al.	Examiner
US7561720(B2)	2009-07-01	Miyahara	Examiner
US7561721(B2)	2009-07-01	Miyahara	Examiner
US7596243(B2)	2009-09-01	Paniconi et al.	Examiner
US2001/0028729(A1)	2001-10-01	Nishigaki et al.	Examiner
US2002/0087269(A1)	2002-07-01	Sasaki et al.	Examiner
US2002/0134151(A1)	2002-09-01	Naruoka et al.	Examiner
US2002/0159616(A1)	2002-10-01	Ohta	Examiner
US2002/0159627(A1)	2002-10-01	Schneiderman et al.	Examiner
US2003/0053658(A1)	2003-03-01	Pavlidis	Examiner
US2003/0053659(A1)	2003-03-01	Pavlidis et al.	Examiner
US2003/0055563(A1)	2003-03-01	Lars et al.	Examiner
US2003/0091228(A1)	2003-05-01	Nagaoka et al.	Examiner
US2003/0108220(A1)	2003-06-01	Jepson et al.	Examiner
US2003/0123703(A1)	2003-07-01	Pavlidis et al.	Examiner
US2003/0151664(A1)	2003-08-01	Wakimoto et al.	Examiner
US2003/0156737(A1)	2003-08-01	Ohtsuka et al.	Examiner
US2003/0160866(A1)	2003-08-01	Hori et al.	Examiner
US2003/0169340(A1)	2003-09-01	Kamijo et al.	Examiner
US2003/0185421(A1)	2003-10-01	Okamoto et al.	Examiner
US2003/0210807(A1)	2003-11-01	Sato et al.	Examiner
US2003/0219146(A1)	2003-11-01	Jepson et al.	Examiner
US2003/0235327(A1)	2003-12-01	Srinivasa	Examiner
US2004/0057599(A1)	2004-03-01	Okada et al.	Examiner
US2004/0096082(A1)	2004-05-01	Nakai et al.	Examiner
US2004/0107033(A1)	2004-06-01	Rao et al.	Examiner
US2004/0131233(A1)	2004-07-01	Comaniciu et al.	Examiner
US2004/0151342(A1)	2004-08-01	Venetianer et al.	Examiner
US2004/0151343(A1)	2004-08-01	Lee	Examiner
US2004/0183905(A1)	2004-09-01	Comaniciu et al.	Examiner
US2004/0197010(A1)	2004-10-01	Lee et al.	Examiner
US2004/0234136(A1)	2004-11-01	Zhu et al.	Examiner
US2004/0252863(A1)	2004-12-01	Chang et al.	Examiner
US2005/0002572(A1)	2005-01-01	Saptharishi et al.	Examiner
US2005/0004762(A1)	2005-01-01	Takahama et al.	Examiner
US2005/0093697(A1)	2005-05-01	Nichani et al.	Examiner
US2005/0102070(A1)	2005-05-01	Takahama et al.	Examiner
US2005/0104959(A1)	2005-05-01	Han et al.	Examiner
US2005/0104960(A1)	2005-05-01	Han et al.	Examiner
US2005/0104962(A1)	2005-05-01	Han et al.	Examiner
US2005/0125121(A1)	2005-06-01	Isaji et al.	Examiner
US2005/0143887(A1)	2005-06-01	Kinoshita	Examiner
US2005/0169501(A1)	2005-08-01	Fujii et al.	Examiner
US2005/0175219(A1)	2005-08-01	Yang et al.	Examiner
US2005/0196020(A1)	2005-09-01	Comaniciu et al.	Examiner
US2005/0228587(A1)	2005-10-01	Kobayashi et al.	Examiner
US2005/0237385(A1)	2005-10-01	Kosaka et al.	Examiner
US2005/0248654(A1)	2005-11-01	Tsujino et al.	Examiner
US2005/0285937(A1)	2005-12-01	Porikli	Examiner
US2005/0286767(A1)	2005-12-01	Hager et al.	Examiner
US2006/0002587(A1)	2006-01-01	Takahama et al.	Examiner
US2006/0111819(A1)	2006-05-01	Serapio et al.	Examiner
US2006/0140449(A1)	2006-06-01	Otsuka et al.	Examiner
US2006/0153459(A1)	2006-07-01	Zhang et al.	Examiner
US2006/0165277(A1)	2006-07-01	Shan et al.	Examiner
US2006/0171563(A1)	2006-08-01	Takashima et al.	Examiner
US2006/0182312(A1)	2006-08-01	Nakai et al.	Examiner
US2006/0262959(A1)	2006-11-01	Tuzel et al.	Examiner
US2007/0086621(A1)	2007-04-01	Aggarwal et al.	Examiner
US2007/0211917(A1)	2007-09-01	Nakano et al.	Examiner
US2008/0025568(A1)	2008-01-01	Han et al.	Examiner

Non-Patent Literature (21)

Abreu et al., “Video-based multi-agent traffic surveillance system,” 2000, IEEE, Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings of, pp. 457-462.Examiner
Willett et al., “Integration of Bayes detection with target tracking,” Jan. 2001, IEEE, Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 49, Issue 1, pp. 17-29.Examiner
Kato et al., “Preceding vehicle recognition based on learning from sample images,” Dec. 2002, IEEE, Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 3, Issue 4, pp. 252-260.Examiner
Handmann et al., “An image processing system for driver assistance,” Apr. 2000, Elsevier Science B.V., Image and Vision Computing, vol. 18, Issue 5, pp. 367-376.Examiner
Schneiderman, H.; Kanade, T., “A statistical method for 3D object detection applied to faces and cars,” 2000, IEEE, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Proceedings of, vol. 1, pp. 746-751.Examiner
Betke et al., “Multiple vehicle detection and tracking in hard real-time,” Sep. 19-20, 1996, IEEE, Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings of the 1996, pp. 351-356.Examiner
Sun et al., “A real-time precrash vehicle detection system,” Dec. 3-4, 2002, IEEE, Applications of Computer Vision, Proceedings. Sixth IEEE Workshop, pp. 171-176.Examiner
Gupte et al., “Detection and classification of vehicles,” Mar. 2002, IEEE, Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transaction on, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 37-47.Examiner
Enkelmann, W., “Obstacle detection by evaluation of optical flow fields from image sequences,” 1990, Springer Berline/Heidelberg, Computer Vision, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 427, pp. 134-138.Examiner
Dellaert, F.; Thorpe, C., “Robust car tracking using Kalman filtering and Bayesian templates,” 1997, Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp.Examiner
Dallart, F., “CANSS: A candidate selection and search algorithm to initialize car tracking,” Oct. 1997, Carnegie Mellon University, CMU-RI-TR-97-34.Examiner
Kang et al., “Tracking objects from multiple stationary and moving cameras,” Feb. 23, 2004, IEEE, Intelligent Distributed Surveillance Systems, pp. 31-35.Examiner
Haag, M.; Nagel, H., “Combination of edge element and optical flow estimates for 3D model based vehicle tracking in traffic image sequences,” Dec. 1999, Springer Netherlands, International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 295-319.Examiner
Schmid, M., “An approach to model based 3-D recognition of vehicles in real time by machine vision,” Sep. 12-16, 1994, IEEE, Intelligent Robots and Systems '94, Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ/GI International Conference on, vol. 3, pp. 2064-2071.Examiner
Zhu, Y.; Comaniciu, D.; Pelkofer, M.; Koehler, T., “Passing vehicle detection form dynamic background using information fusion,” Oct. 3-6, 2004, IEEE, Intelligent Transportation Systems, The 7th Annual Conference on, pp. 564-569.Examiner
Isard, M.; Blake, A., “Condensation—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking,” 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers, International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 29, pp. 5-28.Examiner
Donohoe, G.W., “Combining Segmentation and Tracking for the Classification of Moving Objects in Video Scenes,” 1988, Maple Press, Signals, Systems and Computer, Twenty-Second Asilomar Conference on, vol. 2, pp. 533-538.Examiner
Thomanek, F.; Dickmanns, D., “Obstacle detection, tracking and state estimation for autonomous road vehicles guidance,” Jul. 7-10, 1992, IEEE, Intelligent Robots and Systems, Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on, vol. 2, pp. 1399-1406.Examiner
Ferryman, J.; Maybank, S.; Worrall, A., “Visual Surveillance for Moving Vehicles,” Jun. 2000, Springer Netherlands, International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 187-197.Examiner
Kruger, W., “Robust real-time ground plane motion compensation from a moving vehicle,” Dec. 1999, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Machine Vision and Applications, vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 203-212.Examiner
Comaniciu, D., “Nonparametric Information Fusion for Motion Estimation,” Jun. 18-20, 2003, IEEE, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings, Computer Society Conference on, vol. 1, pp. I-59-I-66 vol. 1.Examiner

Abstract