US 7,619,617 B2Grant

Size/scale and orientation determination of a pointer in a camera-based touch system

Issue Date:2009-11-17

•48 Claims

•7 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

A touch system includes a touch surface and at least two cameras associated with the touch surface. The at least two cameras acquire images of the touch surface from different locations and having overlapping fields of view. A digital signal processor is associated with each camera. The digital signal processors process pixel data acquired by selected pixel subsets of the at least two digital cameras to generate pointer characteristic data when a pointer exists in the acquired images. The pointer characteristic data identifies edges of the pointer. A master digital signal processor triangulates the edge information in the pointer characteristic data to determine a bounding area that represents a pointer perimeter.

Metadata

Assignee

Smart Technologies ULC

Inventors

Gerald Morrison
Trevor Akitt
Scott Su

Application Information

Application Number:US 11/236,622

Filing Date:2005-09-28

Priority Date:2002-11-15

Art Unit:2629

Classifications

IPC:

G06F3/041

Patent Drawings (7 sheets)

Description

[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/294,917, filed Nov. 15, 2002 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,954,197), incorporated herein by reference.

Field of the Invention

[0002] The present invention relates generally to camera-based touch systems and in particular to a method of determining the size/scale and orientation of a pointer in a camera-based touch system and to a camera-based touch system employing pointer size/scale and orientation determination.

Background of the Invention

[0003] Camera-based touch systems that use optical recording devices such as cameras to acquire images of a touch surface and process the image data to determine the position of a pointer relative to the touch surface are known. For example, International PCT Application No. WO 02/03316 to Smart Technologies Inc. et al discloses a camera-based touch system including a touch surface and a plurality of cameras associated with the touch surface. The cameras have overlapping fields of view encompassing the touch surface. The cameras acquire images of the touch surface from different locations and generate image data. Processing circuitry receives and processes the image data generated by the cameras to determine the location of a pointer captured in the images relative to the touch surface using triangulation.

[0004] In particular, a processor associated with each camera receives the image data generated by the camera and processes the image data to detect the existence of the pointer in the image. Pointer information packets (PIPs) are generated by the camera processors when the pointer exists in the captured images. The PIPs, among other things, identify the pointer and either its tip or its median line. The tip or median line data in the PIPs is then processed by a master controller to determine the position of the pointer relative to the touch surface using triangulation.

[0005] Although the above-identified camera-based touch system provides significant advantages over other types of prior art passive touch systems such as analog resistive, surface acoustic wave and capacitive touch systems, improvements are always desired. Since the above-described camera-based touch system uses single point triangulation to determine the position of the pointer relative to the touch surface, resolution is limited. In addition, the camera-based touch system does not readily provide for resolution of pointer ambiguity. Accordingly, there is a need for an improved camera-based touch system.

[0006] It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a novel method of determining the size/scale and orientation of a pointer in a camera-based touch system and to a camera-based touch system employing pointer size/scale and orientation determination.

Summary of the Invention

[0007] According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a touch system comprising:

[0008] at least two optical devices associated with a touch surface, said at least two optical recording devices acquiring images of said touch surface from different locations and having overlapping fields of view; and

[0009] processing circuitry processing image data acquired by said at least two optical recording devices to detect edges of a pointer in said images and to triangulate the detected edges to determine a bounding area that defines a pointer perimeter.

[0010] Preferably, the processing circuitry further determines the center of the bounding area thereby to determine the center of the pointer. It is also preferred that the processing circuitry examines the shape of the bounding area to determine the orientation of the pointer relative to the touch surface.

[0011] In one embodiment, the touch surface is generally rectangular and an optical recording device is positioned adjacent each corner of the touch surface. The processing circuitry triangulates detected edges in images captured by multiple pairs of optical recording devices to yield multiple bounding areas. The smallest bounding area is selected as the bounding area defining the pointer perimeter. The processing circuitry averages the centers of the multiple bounding areas to determine the center of the pointer.

[0012] In a preferred form, the optical recording devices are CMOS digital cameras having selectable pixels arrays. Pixel data from subsets of the pixel arrays is processed by the processing circuitry. The processing circuitry includes a camera processor associated with each digital camera to process pixel data and detect edges of the pointer. A master processor triangulates the detected edges to yield the multiple bounding areas and selects the smallest bounding area as the bounding area representing the pointer perimeter.

[0013] Preferably pixel data at least from pixel rows capturing the region of the pointer in contact with the touch surface is processed to determine the bounding area. It is further preferred that pixel data from pixel rows capturing regions of the pointer along its length are processed to yield a series of bounding areas, the bounding areas being stacked to generate a volumetric representation of the pointer.

[0014] In another embodiment, the processing circuitry superimposes a model over the bounding area with the model defining the pointer perimeter. The processing circuitry examines parameters of the model thereby to determine the center or tip location of the pointer. The model may take the form of a rectangular box centered over the bounding area.

[0015] According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a touch system comprising:

[0016] at least two digital cameras associated with a touch surface, said at least two digital cameras acquiring images of said touch surface from different locations and having overlapping fields of view; and

[0017] processing circuitry processing pixel data acquired by said at least two digital cameras to detect edges of a pointer in said images and to triangulate the detected edges to determine at least one bounding area that represents a pointer perimeter.

[0018] According to yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a touch system comprising:

[0019] a touch surface;

[0020] at least two cameras associated with said touch surface, said at least two cameras acquiring images of said touch surface from different locations and having overlapping fields of view;

[0021] a digital signal processor associated with each camera, the digital signal processors associated with said at least two cameras processing pixel data acquired by selected pixel subsets of the at least two digital cameras to generate pointer characteristic data when a pointer exists in said acquired images, said pointer characteristic data identifying edges of said pointer; and

[0022] a master digital signal processor triangulating the edge information in said pointer characteristic data to determine a bounding area defining a pointer perimeter.

[0023] According to still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of detecting the perimeter of a pointer relative to a touch surface comprising the steps of:

[0024] acquiring multiple images of a pointer relative to said touch surface;

[0025] processing pixel data resulting from said images to detect edges of said pointer; and

[0026] triangulating the detected edges to determine a bounding area representing said perimeter.

[0027] According to still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of erasing electronic ink presented on a touch surface in response to movement of a pointer over said touch surface, said method comprising the steps of:

[0028] tracking movement of said pointer over said touch surface;

[0029] determining the perimeter of the pointer that is in contact with said touch surface; and

[0030] erasing electronic ink contacted by said determined perimeter.

[0031] Since two or more cameras acquire an image of the pointer when the pointer is adjacent the touch surface, the edge co-ordinates of the pointer generated by each camera define a bounding area that represents the pointer perimeter. The size and the orientation of the bounding area allows the size and orientation of the pointer to be determined. In addition, parameters of the bounding area can be used to determine the center or tip location of the pointer. Using this bounding area data to locate the pointer tip provides increased pointer position determination accuracy than is achievable using single point triangulation. This is due to the fact that by selecting the minimum bounding area, noise in the captured images that can create jitter, is reduced.

[0032] The present invention provides further advantages in that when more than two cameras are used, if one of the triangulation camera pairs yields a poor bounding area result, the other triangulation camera pairs are automatically used to determine the bounding area.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0033] Embodiments of the present invention will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

[0034] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a camera-based touch system in accordance with the present invention;

[0035] FIG. 2 is an isometric view of a touch screen forming part of the touch system of FIG. 1;

[0036] FIG. 3 is an isometric view of a corner portion of the touch screen of FIG. 2;

[0037] FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a digital camera forming part of the touch screen of FIG. 2;

[0038] FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a master controller forming part of the touch system of FIG. 1;

[0039] FIG. 6 shows triangulation geometry used to calculate a pointer contact position on the touch surface of the touch screen;

[0040] FIGS. 7 to 9 are graphical representations of overlapping triangulated pointer edges defining bounding areas generated in response to contacts on the touch surface using different type pointers, models in the form of shaded rectangular boxes being superimposed on the bounding areas; and

[0041] FIGS. 10 and 11 are screen shots generated by a diagnostic program showing the size, orientation and relative scale of different pointers contacting the touch surface.

Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments

[0042] Turning now to FIG. 1, a camera-based touch system such as that described in International PCT No. WO 02/03316 filed on Jul. 5, 2001, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, is shown and is generally identified by reference numeral 50. As can be seen, touch system 50 includes a touch screen 52 coupled to a digital signal processor (DSP) based master controller 54. Master controller 54 is also coupled to a computer 56. Computer 56 executes one or more application programs and provides display output that is presented on the touch screen 52 via a projector 58. The touch screen 52, master controller 54, computer 56 and projector 58 form a closed-loop so that user contacts with the touch screen 52 can be recorded as writing, drawing or erasing or can be used to control execution of application programs executed by the computer 56. In the case of writing or drawing, electronic ink corresponding to pointer movement over the touch screen is presented. In the case of erasing, presented electronic ink contacted by the pointer is removed.

[0043] FIGS. 2 to 4 better illustrate the touch screen 52. Touch screen 52 includes a touch surface 60 bordered by a rectangular frame or bezel 62. Touch surface 60 is in the form of a rectangular planar sheet of passive material but may in fact be any suitable surface. Optical recording devices in the form of DSP-based CMOS digital cameras 63₀to 63₃are positioned adjacent each corner of the touch screen 52. Each digital camera 63_Nis mounted on a frame assembly 64. Each frame assembly 64 includes an angled support plate 66 on which the digital camera 63_Nis mounted. Supporting frame elements 70 and 72 are mounted on the plate 66 by way of posts 74 and secure the plate 66 to the frame 62.

[0044] Each digital camera 63_Nincludes a two-dimensional CMOS image sensor 80 having an associated lens assembly, a first-in-first-out (FIFO) buffer 82 coupled to the image sensor 80 by a data bus and a digital signal processor (DSP) 84 coupled to the FIFO 82 by a data bus and to the image sensor 80 by a control bus. A boot EPROM 86 and a power supply subsystem 88 are also included.

[0045] In the present embodiment, the CMOS camera image sensor 80 is a National LM9617 image sensor configured for a 640×20 pixel subarray that can be operated to capture image frames at rates in excess of 200 frames per second. Arbitrary pixel rows of the image sensor 80 can be selected. Since the pixel rows can be arbitrarily selected, the pixel subarray can be exposed for a greater duration for a given digital camera frame rate providing for good operation in darker rooms in addition to well lit rooms. The FIFO buffer 82 is manufactured by Cypress under part number CY7C4211V and the DSP 84 is manufactured by Analog Devices under part number ADSP2185M.

[0046] The DSP 84 receives and processes image frames from the image sensor 80 to determine the edges of a pointer within the image frames. In addition, the DSP 84 provides control information to the image sensor 80 via the control bus. The control information allows the DSP 84 to control perimeters of the image sensor 80 such as exposure, gain, array configuration, reset and initialization. The DSP 84 also provides clock signals to the image sensor 80 to control the frame rate of the image sensor 80.

[0047] The angle of the plate 66 and the optics of the digital cameras 63_Nare selected so that the field of view (FOV) of each digital camera 63_Nis slightly beyond 90°. In this way, the entire touch surface 60 is within the field of view of each digital camera 63_Nwith the field of view of each digital camera 63_Nextending slightly beyond a designated peripheral edge of the touch surface 60 as shown in FIG. 6.

[0048] Master controller 54 is best illustrated in FIG. 5 and includes a DSP 90, a boot EPROM 92, a serial line driver 94 and a power supply subsystem 95. The DSP 90 communicates with the DSPs 84 of the digital cameras 630 to 633 over a data bus via a serial port 96 and communicates with the computer 56 over a data bus via a serial port 98 and the serial line driver 94. In this embodiment, the DSP 90 is manufactured by Analog Devices under part number ADSP2185M. The serial line driver 94 is manufactured by Analog Devices under part number ADM222.

[0049] The master controller 54 and each digital camera 63_Nfollow a communication protocol that enables bi-directional communications via a common serial cable similar to a universal serial bus (USB). The transmission bandwidth is divided into thirty-two (32) 16-bit channels. Of the thirty-two channels, six (6) channels are assigned to each of the DSPs 84 in the digital cameras 630 to 633 and to the DSP 90 in the master controller 54 and the remaining two (2) channels are unused. The master controller 54 monitors the twenty-four (24) channels assigned to the DSPs 84. The DSPs 84 monitor the six (6) channels assigned to the DSP 90 of the master controller 54. Communications between the master controller 54 and the digital cameras 63₀to 63₃are performed as background processes in response to interrupts.

[0050] The operation of the touch system 50 will now be described. Initially, a camera offset angle calibration routine is performed to determine the offset angle δ of each digital camera 63_N(see FIG. 6). Details of the camera offset angle calibration are described in Applicants' co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09,870,698 entitled “Calibrating Camera Offsets to Facilitate Object Position Determination Using Triangulation” filed on Jun. 1, 2001, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

[0051] With the touch system 50 calibrated, each digital camera 63_Nacquires image frames of the touch surface 60 within the field of view of its image sensor 80 at a desired frame rate and loads the pixel data associated with the selected pixel subarray into the FIFO buffer 82. The DSP 84 in turn reads the pixel data from the FIFO buffer 82 and processes the pixel data to determine if a pointer exists in the image frame.

[0052] If a pointer is in the acquired image frame, the pixel data is further processed by the DSP 84 to determine the edges of the pointer visible to the digital camera 63_Nin each pixel row of the subarray. In the present embodiment, a combination of image contrast with a differentiating edge detector is used. Specifics concerning edge detection can be found in “The Image Processing Handbook”, Fourth Edition by John C. Russ, CRC Press, Publication Date: Jul. 26, 2002, Chapter 4: Image Enhancement and in “Algorithms for Image Processing and Computer Vision” by J. R. Parker, Wiley Computer Publishing, Publication Date: 1997, Chapter 1: Advanced Edge Detection Techniques. The z-position of the pointer is also determined so that a determination can be made as to whether the pointer is contacting or hovering above the touch surface 60. Pointer information packets (PIPs), including the pointer edge and contact or hover data, status and/or diagnostic information, are then generated by the DSP 84 and the PIPs are queued for transmission to the master controller 54. The digital cameras 63₀to 63₃also receive and respond to command PIPs generated by the master controller 54.

[0053] The master controller 54 polls the digital cameras 63₀to 63₃for PIPs in the queues. In this particular embodiment, the master controller 54 polls the digital cameras at a rate exceeding the image sensor frame rates. Upon receipt of PIPs from the digital cameras 63_N, the master controller 54 examines the PIPs to determine if the PIPs include pointer edge data. If the PIPs include pointer edge data, the master controller 54 triangulates the pointer edge data in the PIPs to determine bounding areas in which the pointer is located.

[0054] During triangulation, triangulation is performed in respect of each pair of cameras capturing images of the pointer with the exception of the diagonal digital camera pairs and for each pixel row to yield a plurality of bounding areas. The minimum bounding area, which may range from a four-sided polygon to an eight-sided polygon, for each pixel row is then selected to reduce the effects of erroneous or suboptimal measurements. Once the minimum bounding area for each pixel row has been selected, a model, in the present embodiment a rectangular box whose size is a function of the size of the minimum bounding area, is superimposed on the bounding area and defines the pointer perimeter and hence pointer size at that pixel row. The size of the box describes the pointer size in terms of pixels by height and width.

[0055] In order to determine the centre of the pointer at a selected pixel row, the parameters of the model such as its center, superimposed on each bounding area is determined and the centers are averaged to determine the pointer center in sub-pixel accuracy.

[0056] The size and orientation of the model superimposed on the smallest bounding area for each pixel row is used by the master controller 54 to determine the size and orientation of the pointer. Knowing the size of pointer helps to reduce pointer ambiguity. If there is prior knowledge concerning the pointer size, then the acquired bounding areas can be used to identify quickly potential pointers from other objects captured in the camera images. Objects that are too large or too small as compared to the historical pointer size can be discarded as erroneous.

[0057] Knowing the orientation of the pointer can be important depending on the shape of the pointer. If the bounding area is circular, the pointer is a cylindrical and pointer orientation is not important. However, if the bounding area is rectangular in shape then pointer orientation becomes important. For example in the case of a pointer in the form of a standard rectangular chalk board eraser, if the longest side of the rectangular eraser runs up and down, then it can be determined that the eraser is held in a vertical orientation. Likewise if the longest side of the rectangular eraser runs left to right, then it can be determined that the eraser is held in a horizontal orientation. Being able to determine pointer orientation is particularly beneficial when performing an erasing function since erasing can be limited to the pointer perimeter contacting the touch surface regardless of the pointer size. This is substantially different from single point contact touch systems that erase a predefined area surrounding a touch surface contact irrespective of pointer size and orientation.

[0058] The master controller 54 also calculates a volumetric representation of the pointer by examining the model superimposed on the minimum bounding area associated with each pixel row of the subarray. Changes in size of the model enable the configuration of the pointer to be determined. For example, in the case of a conical pointer, the pixel row capturing pixel data associated with the tip of the pointer, yields a small bounding area and an equally small model. Pixel rows capturing pixel data associated with the pointer body away from the pointer tip, yield larger bounding areas as the pointer broadens and therefore equally larger models. This change in model size allows the master controller 54 to determine the conical configuration of the pointer.

[0059] In the case of a pointer such as a finger that has a generally cylindrical shape, especially when the finger is pressed and flattened against the touch surface, the pixel rows capturing pixel data along the length of the finger, yield bounding areas and corresponding models that are basically the same size. This allows the master controller 54 to determine the cylindrical configuration of the pointer. As will be appreciated, by stacking the bounding areas or models generated for a series of pixel rows, a three-dimensional volumetric representation of the pointer can be constructed allowing the pointer type to be determined.

[0060] Once the master controller 54 has determined the pointer perimeter and the pointer orientation, the master controller 54 transmits the calculated pointer perimeter and orientation data, status and/or diagnostic information to the computer 56. In this manner, the pointer perimeter and orientation data transmitted to the computer 56 can be recorded as writing, drawing or erasing or can be used to control execution of application programs executed by the computer 56. The computer 56 also updates the display output conveyed to the projector 58 so that information presented on the touch surface 60 reflects the pointer activity. The master controller 54 also receives commands from the computer 56 and responds accordingly as well as generates and conveys command PIPs to the digital cameras 63_N.

[0061] Turning now to FIGS. 7 to 9, graphical representations of overlapping triangulated edges defining bounding areas are shown. As can be seen, the bounding areas are not box-shaped but actually take the form of multi-sided polygons with the number of sides of the polygons ranging from four when using PIPs generated by a pair of cameras to eight when using PIPs generated by four cameras. In FIG. 7, the bounding area is generated as a result of a finger contacting the touch surface. In FIG. 8, the bounding area is generated as a result of a hockey puck contacting the touch surface. In FIG. 9, the bounding area is generated as a result of a rectangular eraser contacting the touch surface with the longest side of the eraser being in the horizontal orientation. As will be appreciated, this Figure clearly shows how pointer orientation can be used and in this case defines an erase tool perimeter of the correct size and orientation.

[0062] FIGS. 10 and 11 are screen shots generated by a diagnostic program showing the size, orientation and relative scale of different pointers contacting the touch surface. In particularly, FIG. 10 shows a small pointer of uniform width and height contacting the touch surface. The size of the pointer is 161×173 pixels. FIG. 11 shows a different pointer in contact with the touch surface. The size of the pointer in this case is 444×767 pixels.

[0063] Although a box-shaped rectangular model is shown superimposed over the bounding areas, those of skill in the art will appreciate that other model shapes may be used. Alternatively, the shapes of the bounding areas may be used to define the pointer perimeters. The center of the pointer can likewise be calculated by averaging the centers of the bounding areas. Also, although the master controller is shown as a separate processor, one of the camera processors may perform the master controller function and receive PIPs from the other camera processors.

[0064] As previously described in order to generate a three-dimensional volumetric representation of the pointer, the bounding area or model associated with each pixel row of the subarray is placed in a stack and the sizes of the bounding areas or models are compared. Of course only selected bounding areas or models need be examined. Also, if only pointer contact with the touch surface is of concern, triangulation need only be performed for the pixel row looking directly along the touch surface. In this manner, only the pointer perimeter at the touch surface contact point is defined.

[0065] Although preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described, those of skill in the art will appreciate that variations and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof as defined by the appended claims.

Claims

Certificate of Correction present

The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.

What is claimed is:

1. A touch system comprising:

at least two optical recording devices associated with a touch surface, said at least two optical recording devices acquiring images from different vantages and having overlapping fields of view, the at least two optical recording devices being accommodated by a frame at least partially bordering said touch surface; and

2. A touch system according to claim 1 wherein said processing structure determines the center of the bounding area thereby to determine the center of said pointer.

3. A touch system according to claim 2 wherein said processing structure examines the shape of the bounding area to determine the orientation of said pointer relative to said touch surface.

4. A touch system according to claim 3 wherein said touch surface is generally rectangular and wherein an optical recording device is positioned adjacent each corner of said touch surface, said processing structure triangulating detected edges in images captured by multiple pairs of optical recording devices to yield multiple bounding areas, the smallest of said bounding areas being selected as the bounding area defining said pointer region.

5. A touch system according to claim 4 wherein said processing structure averages the centers of said multiple bounding areas to determine the center of said pointer.

6. A touch system according to claim 4 wherein said optical recording devices are digital cameras.

7. A touch system according to claim 6 wherein said digital cameras have selectable pixel arrays, pixel data from subsets of said pixel arrays being processed by said processing structure.

8. A touch system according to claim 7 wherein said processing structure comprises a camera processor associated with each digital camera, each camera processor processing pixel data to detect edges of said pointer.

9. A touch system according to claim 8 wherein said processing structure further comprises a master processor triangulating the detected edges to determine said multiple bounding areas and to select said smallest bounding area.

10. A touch system according to claim 9 wherein said master processor processes image data at a rate greater than the frame rates of said digital cameras.

11. A touch system according to claim 1 wherein said processing structure superimposes a model over said bounding area, said model having a size proportional to said bounding area and defining said pointer region.

12. A touch system according to claim 11 wherein said processing structure determines the center of said model thereby to determine the center of said pointer.

13. A touch system according to claim 12 wherein said model is generally rectangular and is centered over said bounding area.

14. A touch system according to claim 11 wherein the size of the model is examined to identify non-pointer input.

15. A touch system according to claim 14 wherein identified non-pointer input is ignored.

16. A touch system according to claim 1 wherein said optical recording devices are digital cameras having selectable pixel arrays, pixel data at least from pixel subsets of said pixel arrays being processed by said processing structure to determine said bounding area.

17. A touch system according to claim 16 wherein said processing structure examines the shape of said bounding area to determine the orientation of said pointer relative to said touch surface.

18. A touch system according to claim 1 wherein the optical recoding devices are positioned adjacent different corners of said touch surface.

19. A touch system according to claim 18 wherein the field of view of each optical recording device exceeds 90 degrees.

20. A touch system according to claim 1 wherein said touch surface is generally rectangular and wherein said frame surrounds said touch surface.

21. A touch system according to claim 20 wherein the optical recording devices are positioned adjacent different corners of said touch surface.

22. A touch system according to claim 21 wherein the field of view of each optical recording device exceeds 90 degrees.

23. A touch system according to claim 21 wherein said optical recording devices are digital cameras.

24. A touch system according to claim 23 wherein said digital cameras have selectable pixel arrays, pixel data from subsets of said pixel arrays being processed by said processing structure.

25. A touch system according to claim 21 wherein said processing structure processes image data at a rate greater than the frame rates of said optical recording devices.

26. A touch system comprising:

at least two optical recording devices associated with an input region, said at least two optical recording devices acquiring images from different vantages and having overlapping fields of view; and

processing structure processing image data acquired by said at least two optical recording devices to detect edges of a pointer in said images and to triangulate the detected edges to determine a bounding area that defines a pointer region, said processing structure processing the image data at a rate greater than the frame rates of said optical recording devices.

27. A touch system according to claim 26 wherein said optical recording devices are digital cameras.

28. A touch system according to claim 27 wherein said digital cameras have selectable pixel arrays, pixel data from subsets of said pixel arrays being processed by said processing structure.

29. A touch system according to claim 28 wherein said processing structure comprises a camera processor associated with each digital camera, each camera processor processing pixel data to detect edges of said pointer.

30. A touch system according to claim 26 wherein said processing structure determines the center of the bounding area thereby to determine the center of said pointer.

31. A touch system according to claim 27 wherein said processing structure examines the shape of the bounding area to determine the orientation of said pointer relative to said input region.

32. A touch system according to claim 26 wherein the optical recording devices are positioned adjacent different corners of said input region.

33. A touch system according to claim 32 where the field of view of each optical recording device exceeds 90 degrees.

34. A touch system comprising:

at least two digital cameras associated with a touch surface, said at least two digital cameras acquiring images from different vantages and having overlapping fields of view, each digital camera having a selectable pixel array; and

processing circuitry processing image data of pixel subsets of the pixel arrays of said at least two digital cameras to triangulate detected edges of a pointer in said images thereby to determine a boundary area representing a pointer region.

35. A touch system according to claim 34 wherein said processing circuitry further determines the center of the bounding area thereby to determine the center of said pointer.

36. A touch system according to claim 35 wherein said processing circuitry examines the shape of the bounding area to determine the orientation of said pointer relative to said touch surface.

37. A touch system according to claim 34 wherein said touch surface is generally rectangular and wherein a digital camera is positioned adjacent each corner of the touch surface, said processing circuitry triangulating detected edges of a pointer in images captured by multiple pairs of digital cameras to yield multiple bounding areas, the smallest bounding area being selected to represent said pointer region.

38. A touch system according to claim 37 wherein said processing structure averages the centers of said multiple bounding areas to determine the center of said pointer.

39. A touch system according to claim 37 wherein said processing structure superimposes a model over each of said bounding areas, the model superimposed on the smallest bounding area defining said pointer region.

40. A touch system according to claim 39 wherein the size of the model is examined to identify non-pointer input.

41. A touch system according to claim 40 wherein identified non-pointer input is ignored.

42. A touch system according to claim 41 wherein said processing circuitry processes image data at a rate greater than the frame rate of said digital cameras.

43. A touch system comprising:

at least two image sensors associated with a touch surface, said at least two image sensors acquiring images from different vantages and having overlapping fields of view; and

processing structure processing pixel data acquired by said at least two image sensors that is associated with regions of said pointer along its length to detect edges of the pointer in each region and triangulating the detected edges to yield a series of bounding areas, said series of bounding areas being stacked to generate a volumetric representation of said pointer.

44. A touch system according to claim 43 wherein said processing structure further determines the centroid of the volumetric representation of said pointer thereby to determine the centroid of said pointer.

45. A touch system according to claim 44 wherein said processing structure examines the volumetric representation to determine the orientation of said pointer relative to said touch surface.

46. A touch system according to claim 45 wherein said touch surface is generally rectangular and wherein the image sensors are positioned adjacent different corners of said touch surface.

47. A touch system according to claim 43 wherein said image sensors have selectable pixel arrays, pixel data from subsets of said pixel arrays being processed by said processing structure.

48. A touch system according to claim 47 wherein said processing structure processes data at a rate greater than the frame rates of said image sensors.

Patent Citations (231)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US4107522(A)	1978-08-01	Walter	Applicant
US4144449(A)	1979-03-01	Funk et al.	Applicant
US4247767(A)	1981-01-01	O'Brien et al.	Applicant
US4507557(A)	1985-03-01	Tsikos	Applicant
US4558313(A)	1985-12-01	Garwin	Applicant
US4737631(A)	1988-04-01	Sasaki	Applicant
US4742221(A)	1988-05-01	Sasaki et al.	Applicant
US4746770(A)	1988-05-01	McAvinney	Applicant
US4762990(A)	1988-08-01	Caswell et al.	Applicant
US4782328(A)	1988-11-01	Denlinger	Applicant
US4818826(A)	1989-04-01	Kimura	Applicant
US4820050(A)	1989-04-01	Griffin	Applicant
US4822145(A)	1989-04-01	Staelin	Applicant
US4831455(A)	1989-05-01	Ishikawa	Applicant
US4868912(A)	1989-09-01	Doering	Applicant
US4980547(A)	1990-12-01	Griffin	Applicant
US5025314(A)	1991-06-01	Tang et al.	Applicant
US5097516(A)	1992-03-01	Amir	Applicant
US5109435(A)	1992-04-01	Lo et al.	Applicant
US5130794(A)	1992-07-01	Ritchey	Examiner
US5140647(A)	1992-08-01	Ise et al.	Applicant
US5196835(A)	1993-03-01	Blue et al.	Applicant
US5239373(A)	1993-08-01	Tang et al.	Applicant
US5317140(A)	1994-05-01	Dunthorn	Applicant
US5359155(A)	1994-10-01	Helser	Applicant
US5374971(A)	1994-12-01	Clapp et al.	Applicant
US5448263(A)	1995-09-01	Martin	Applicant
US5483261(A)	1996-01-01	Yasutake	Applicant
US5483603(A)	1996-01-01	Luke et al.	Applicant
US5484966(A)	1996-01-01	Segen	Applicant
US5490655(A)	1996-02-01	Bates	Applicant
US5502568(A)	1996-03-01	Ogawa et al.	Applicant
US5528263(A)	1996-06-01	Platzker et al.	Applicant
US5528290(A)	1996-06-01	Saund	Applicant
US5537107(A)	1996-07-01	Funado	Applicant
US5554828(A)	1996-09-01	Primm	Applicant
US5581276(A)	1996-12-01	Cipolla et al.	Applicant
US5581637(A)	1996-12-01	Cass et al.	Applicant
US5594502(A)	1997-01-01	Bito et al.	Applicant
US5638092(A)	1997-06-01	Eng et al.	Applicant
US5670755(A)	1997-09-01	Kwon	Applicant
US5729704(A)	1998-03-01	Stone et al.	Applicant
US5734375(A)	1998-03-01	Knox et al.	Applicant
US5736686(A)	1998-04-01	Perret, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5737740(A)	1998-04-01	Henderson et al.	Applicant
US5745116(A)	1998-04-01	Pisutha-Arnond	Applicant
US5764223(A)	1998-06-01	Chang et al.	Applicant
US5771039(A)	1998-06-01	Ditzik	Applicant
US5790910(A)	1998-08-01	Haskin	Applicant
US5818421(A)	1998-10-01	Ogino et al.	Applicant
US5818424(A)	1998-10-01	Korth	Applicant
US5819201(A)	1998-10-01	DeGraaf	Applicant
US5825352(A)	1998-10-01	Bisset et al.	Applicant
US5831602(A)	1998-11-01	Sato et al.	Applicant
US5911004(A)	1999-06-01	Ohuchi et al.	Applicant
US5914709(A)	1999-06-01	Graham et al.	Applicant
US5920342(A)	1999-07-01	Umeda et al.	Applicant
US5936615(A)	1999-08-01	Waters	Examiner
US5943783(A)	1999-08-01	Jackson	Applicant
US5963199(A)	1999-10-01	Kato et al.	Applicant
US5982352(A)	1999-11-01	Pryor	Applicant
US5988645(A)	1999-11-01	Downing	Applicant
US6002808(A)	1999-12-01	Freeman	Applicant
US6008798(A)	1999-12-01	Mato, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US6031531(A)	2000-02-01	Kimble	Applicant
US6061177(A)	2000-05-01	Fujimoto	Applicant
US6075905(A)	2000-06-01	Herman et al.	Applicant
US6100538(A)	2000-08-01	Ogawa	Applicant
US6104387(A)	2000-08-01	Chery et al.	Applicant
US6118433(A)	2000-09-01	Jenkin et al.	Applicant
US6122865(A)	2000-09-01	Branc et al.	Applicant
US6141000(A)	2000-10-01	Martin	Applicant
US6153836(A)	2000-11-01	Goszyk	Applicant
US6161066(A)	2000-12-01	Wright et al.	Applicant
US6179426(B1)	2001-01-01	Rodriguez, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US6191773(B1)	2001-02-01	Maruno et al.	Applicant
US6208329(B1)	2001-03-01	Ballare	Applicant
US6208330(B1)	2001-03-01	Hasegawa et al.	Applicant
US6209266(B1)	2001-04-01	Branc et al.	Applicant
US6226035(B1)	2001-05-01	Korein et al.	Applicant
US6252989(B1)	2001-06-01	Geisler et al.	Applicant
US6256033(B1)	2001-07-01	Nguyen	Applicant
US6262718(B1)	2001-07-01	Findlay et al.	Applicant
US6310610(B1)	2001-10-01	Beaton et al.	Applicant
US6323846(B1)	2001-11-01	Westerman	Applicant
US6328270(B1)	2001-12-01	Elberbaum	Applicant
US6335724(B1)	2002-01-01	Takekawa et al.	Applicant
US6337681(B1)	2002-01-01	Martin	Applicant
US6339748(B1)	2002-01-01	Hiramatsu	Applicant
US6353434(B1)	2002-03-01	Akebi	Applicant
US6359612(B1)	2002-03-01	Peter et al.	Applicant
US6414671(B1)	2002-07-01	Gillespie et al.	Applicant
US6414673(B1)	2002-07-01	Wood et al.	Applicant
US6421042(B1)	2002-07-01	Omura et al.	Applicant
US6427389(B1)	2002-08-01	Branc et al.	Applicant
US6429856(B1)	2002-08-01	Omura et al.	Applicant
US6496122(B2)	2002-12-01	Sampsell	Applicant
US6497608(B2)	2002-12-01	Ho et al.	Applicant
US6507339(B1)	2003-01-01	Tanaka	Applicant
US6512838(B1)	2003-01-01	Rafii et al.	Applicant
US6517266(B2)	2003-02-01	Saund	Applicant
US6518600(B1)	2003-02-01	Shaddock	Applicant
US6522830(B2)	2003-02-01	Yamagami	Applicant
US6529189(B1)	2003-03-01	Colgan et al.	Applicant
US6530664(B2)	2003-03-01	Vanderwerf et al.	Applicant
US6531999(B1)	2003-03-01	Trajkovic	Applicant
US6545669(B1)	2003-04-01	Kinawi et al.	Applicant
US6559813(B1)	2003-05-01	DeLuca et al.	Applicant
US6563491(B1)	2003-05-01	Omura	Applicant
US6567078(B2)	2003-05-01	Ogawa	Applicant
US6567121(B1)	2003-05-01	Kuno	Applicant
US6570612(B1)	2003-05-01	Saund et al.	Applicant
US6587099(B2)	2003-07-01	Takekawa	Applicant
US6594023(B1)	2003-07-01	Omura et al.	Applicant
US6608619(B2)	2003-08-01	Omura et al.	Examiner
US6626718(B2)	2003-09-01	Hiroki	Applicant
US6630922(B2)	2003-10-01	Fishkin et al.	Applicant
US6633328(B1)	2003-10-01	Byrd et al.	Applicant
US6650822(B1)	2003-11-01	Zhou	Applicant
US6674424(B1)	2004-01-01	Fujioka	Applicant
US6683584(B2)	2004-01-01	Ronzani et al.	Examiner
US6690363(B2)	2004-02-01	Newton	Applicant
US6690397(B1)	2004-02-01	Daignault, Jr.	Applicant
US6710770(B2)	2004-03-01	Tomasi et al.	Applicant
US6741250(B1)	2004-05-01	Furlan et al.	Examiner
US6747636(B2)	2004-06-01	Martin	Applicant
US6756910(B2)	2004-06-01	Ohba et al.	Applicant
US6760009(B2)	2004-07-01	Omura et al.	Applicant
US6760999(B2)	2004-07-01	Branc et al.	Applicant
US6774889(B1)	2004-08-01	Zhang et al.	Applicant
US6803906(B1)	2004-10-01	Morrison et al.	Applicant
US6864882(B2)	2005-03-01	Newton	Applicant
US6919880(B2)	2005-07-01	Morrison et al.	Applicant
US6933981(B1)	2005-08-01	Kishida et al.	Applicant
US6972401(B2)	2005-12-01	Akitt et al.	Applicant
US6972753(B1)	2005-12-01	Kimura et al.	Applicant
US7007236(B2)	2006-02-01	Dempski et al.	Applicant
US7015418(B2)	2006-03-01	Cahill et al.	Examiner
US7030861(B1)	2006-04-01	Westerman	Applicant
US7084868(B2)	2006-08-01	Farag et al.	Examiner
US7098392(B2)	2006-08-01	Sitrick et al.	Applicant
US7121470(B2)	2006-10-01	McCall et al.	Applicant
US7184030(B2)	2007-02-01	McCharles et al.	Examiner
US7187489(B2)	2007-03-01	Miles	Applicant
US7190496(B2)	2007-03-01	Klug et al.	Examiner
US7202860(B2)	2007-04-01	Ogawa	Applicant
US7232986(B2)	2007-06-01	Worthington et al.	Applicant
US7236132(B1)	2007-06-01	Morrison et al.	Applicant
US7274356(B2)	2007-09-01	Ung et al.	Applicant
US7355593(B2)	2008-04-01	Hill et al.	Examiner
US7414617(B2)	2008-08-01	Ogawa	Applicant
US2001/0019325(A1)	2001-09-01	Takekawa	Applicant
US2001/0022579(A1)	2001-09-01	Hirabayashi	Applicant
US2001/0026268(A1)	2001-10-01	Ito	Applicant
US2001/0033274(A1)	2001-10-01	Ong	Applicant
US2002/0036617(A1)	2002-03-01	Pryor	Applicant
US2002/0050979(A1)	2002-05-01	Oberoi et al.	Applicant
US2002/0067922(A1)	2002-06-01	Harris	Applicant
US2002/0080123(A1)	2002-06-01	Kennedy et al.	Applicant
US2002/0145595(A1)	2002-10-01	Satoh	Applicant
US2002/0163530(A1)	2002-11-01	Takakura et al.	Applicant
US2003/0001825(A1)	2003-01-01	Omura et al.	Applicant
US2003/0025951(A1)	2003-02-01	Pollard et al.	Applicant
US2003/0043116(A1)	2003-03-01	Morrison et al.	Applicant
US2003/0046401(A1)	2003-03-01	Abbott et al.	Applicant
US2003/0063073(A1)	2003-04-01	Geaghan et al.	Applicant
US2003/0071858(A1)	2003-04-01	Morohoshi	Applicant
US2003/0085871(A1)	2003-05-01	Ogawa	Applicant
US2003/0095112(A1)	2003-05-01	Kawano et al.	Applicant
US2003/0151532(A1)	2003-08-01	Chen et al.	Applicant
US2003/0151562(A1)	2003-08-01	Kulas	Applicant
US2004/0021633(A1)	2004-02-01	Rajkowski	Applicant
US2004/0031779(A1)	2004-02-01	Cahill et al.	Examiner
US2004/0046749(A1)	2004-03-01	Ikeda	Applicant
US2004/0108990(A1)	2004-06-01	Lieberman	Applicant
US2004/0149892(A1)	2004-08-01	Akitt et al.	Applicant
US2004/0150630(A1)	2004-08-01	Hinckley et al.	Applicant
US2004/0169639(A1)	2004-09-01	Pate et al.	Applicant
US2004/0178993(A1)	2004-09-01	Morrison et al.	Applicant
US2004/0178997(A1)	2004-09-01	Gillespie et al.	Applicant
US2004/0179001(A1)	2004-09-01	Morrison et al.	Applicant
US2004/0189720(A1)	2004-09-01	Wilson et al.	Applicant
US2004/0252091(A1)	2004-12-01	Ma et al.	Applicant
US2005/0052427(A1)	2005-03-01	Wu et al.	Applicant
US2005/0057524(A1)	2005-03-01	Hill et al.	Applicant
US2005/0083308(A1)	2005-04-01	Homer et al.	Applicant
US2005/0151733(A1)	2005-07-01	Sander et al.	Applicant
US2005/0190162(A1)	2005-09-01	Newton	Applicant
US2005/0248540(A1)	2005-11-01	Newton	Applicant
US2005/0276448(A1)	2005-12-01	Pryor	Applicant
US2006/0158437(A1)	2006-07-01	Blythe et al.	Applicant
US2006/0202953(A1)	2006-09-01	Pryor et al.	Applicant
US2006/0227120(A1)	2006-10-01	Eikman	Applicant
US2006/0274067(A1)	2006-12-01	Hidai	Applicant
US2007/0075648(A1)	2007-04-01	Blythe et al.	Applicant
US2007/0075982(A1)	2007-04-01	Morrison et al.	Applicant
US2007/0126755(A1)	2007-06-01	Zhang et al.	Applicant
US2007/0139932(A1)	2007-06-01	Sun et al.	Applicant
US2007/0236454(A1)	2007-10-01	Ung et al.	Applicant
US2008/0129707(A1)	2008-06-01	Pryor	Applicant
CA2412878	2002-01-01		Applicant
CA2493236(A1)	2003-12-01		Applicant
DE19810452	1998-12-01		Applicant
EP279652(A)	1988-08-01		Applicant
EP347725(A2)	1989-12-01		Applicant
EP657841(A1)	1995-06-01		Applicant
EP762319(A2)	1997-03-01		Applicant
EP829798(A2)	1998-03-01		Applicant
EP1450243(A2)	2004-08-01		Applicant
EP1297488(B1)	2006-11-01		Applicant
GB2204126(A)	1988-11-01		Applicant
JP57-211637	1982-12-01		Applicant
JP8-108689(A)	1996-04-01		Applicant
JP8-240407	1996-09-01		Applicant
JP9-91094	1997-04-01		Applicant
JP9-224111(A)	1997-08-01		Applicant
JP9-319501	1997-12-01		Applicant
JP10-105324(A)	1998-04-01		Applicant
JP2003-167669(A)	2003-06-01		Applicant
JP2003-173237(A)	2003-06-01		Applicant
JP2001-282456(A)	2007-11-01		Applicant
WO98/07112(A2)	1998-02-01		Applicant
WO99/08897	1999-02-01		Applicant
WO99/21122(A1)	1999-04-01		Applicant
WO99/40562	1999-08-01		Applicant
WO2/03316(A1)	2002-01-01		Applicant
WO2/27461(A1)	2002-04-01		Applicant
WO3/105074(A2)	2003-12-01		Applicant
WO2005/106775(A1)	2005-11-01		Applicant
WO2007/003196(A2)	2007-01-01		Applicant
WO2007/064804(A1)	2007-06-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (18)

Bernhard P. Wrobel, “Minimum Solutions for Orientation”, Calibration and Orientation of Cameras in Computer Vision, Springer Series in Information Sciences, vol. 34, 2001, pp. 28-33.Applicant
Kenichi Kanatani, “Camera Calibration”, Geometric Computation for Machine Vision, Oxford Engineering Science Series, vol. 37, 1993, pp. 56-63.Applicant
Richard Hartley and Andrew Zisserman, “Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision”, Cambridge University Press, First published 2000, Reprinted (with corrections) 2001, pp. 70-73, 92-93, and 98-99.Applicant
Wolfgang Förstner, “On Estimating Rotations”, Festschrift für Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Ebner zum 60. Geburtstag, Herausg.: C. Heipke und H Mayer, Lehrstuhl für Photogrammetrie und Fernerkundung, TU München, 1999, 12 pages. (http://www.ipb.uni-bonn.de/papers/#1999).Applicant
European Search Report for EP 06 01 9269 for a search that was completed on Nov. 9, 2006.Applicant
European Search Report for EP 06 01 9268 for a search that was completed on Nov. 9, 2006.Applicant
European Search Report for EP 02 25 3594 for a search that was completed on Dec. 14, 2005.Applicant
European Search Report for EP 04 25 1392 for a search that was completed on Jan. 11, 2007.Applicant
Wang, Fie-Yue, “Stereo camera calibration without absolute world coordinate information”, SPIE, vol. 2620, pp. 655-662, Jun. 14, 1995.Applicant
Bud K. Funk, CCDs in optical panels deliver high resolution, Electronic Design, Sep. 27, 1980, pp. 139-143.Applicant
International Search Report with a date of mailing of Oct. 22, 2001 for PCTICA 01100980 with an International Filing Date of Jul. 5, 2001.Applicant
International Search Report for PCT/CA2008/001350 mailed Oct. 17, 2008 (5 Pages).Applicant
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2007/002184 mailed Mar. 13, 2008 (13 Pages).Applicant
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2004/001759 mailed Feb. 21, 2005 (7 Pages).Applicant
European Search Opinion for EP 07 25 0888 dated Jun. 22, 2007 (2 pages).Applicant
European Search Report for EP 07 25 0888 dated Jun. 22, 2007 (2 pages).Applicant
Tapper, C.C., et al., “On-Line Handwriting Recognition - A Survey”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Rome, Nov. 14-17, 1988, Washington, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press. US, vol. 2 Conf. 9, Nov. 14, 1988 (Nov. 14, 1988), pp. 1123-1132.Applicant
May 12, 2009 Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,412,878.Applicant

Abstract