US 7,617,005 B2Grant
Methods and apparatus for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation
Issue Date:2009-11-10
•15 Claims
•9 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
Methods and apparatus are provided for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation. Thermally-induced renal neuromodulation may be achieved via direct and/or via indirect application of thermal energy to heat or cool neural fibers that contribute to renal function, or of vascular structures that feed or perfuse the neural fibers. In some embodiments, parameters of the neural fibers, of non-target tissue, or of the thermal energy delivery element, may be monitored via one or more sensors for controlling the thermally-induced neuromodulation. In some embodiments, protective elements may be provided to reduce a degree of thermal damage induced in the non-target tissues.
Metadata
Assignee
- Ardian, Inc.
Inventors
- Denise Demarais
- Nicolas Zadno
- Benjamin J. Clark
- Erik Thai
- Howard R. Levin
- Mark Gelfand
Application Information
Application Number:US 11/504,117
Filing Date:2006-08-14
Priority Date:2002-04-08
Art Unit:3739
Classifications
IPC:
A61N1/00
Patent Drawings (9 sheets)
Description
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/816,999 filed on Jun. 28, 2006. The present application is also a Continuation-In-Part application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/408,665, filed on Apr. 8, 2003, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. (a) 60/370,190, filed on Apr. 8, 2002, (b) 60/415,575, filed on Oct. 3, 2002, and (c) 60/442,970, filed on Jan. 29, 2003. Furthermore, this application is a Continuation-In-Part application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/189,563, filed on Jul. 25, 2005, which is a Continuation-In-Part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/129,765, filed on May 13, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. (a) 60/616,254, filed on Oct. 5, 2004, and (b) 60/624,793, filed on Nov. 2, 2004.
[0002] All of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
[0003] All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0004] The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for neuromodulation. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for achieving renal neuromodulation via thermal heating and/or cooling mechanisms.
BACKGROUND
[0005] Congestive Heart Failure (“CHF”) is a condition that occurs when the heart becomes damaged and reduces blood flow to the organs of the body. If blood flow decreases sufficiently, kidney function becomes altered, which results in fluid retention, abnormal hormone secretions and increased constriction of blood vessels. These results increase the workload of the heart and further decrease the capacity of the heart to pump blood through the kidneys and circulatory system.
[0006] It is believed that progressively decreasing perfusion of the kidneys is a principal non-cardiac cause perpetuating the downward spiral of CHF. Moreover, the fluid overload and associated clinical symptoms resulting from these physiologic changes result in additional hospital admissions, poor quality of life and additional costs to the health care system.
[0007] In addition to their role in the progression of CHF, the kidneys play a significant role in the progression of Chronic Renal Failure (“CRF”), End-Stage Renal Disease (“ESRD”), hypertension (pathologically high blood pressure) and other cardio-renal diseases. The functions of the kidneys can be summarized under three broad categories: filtering blood and excreting waste products generated by the body's metabolism; regulating salt, water, electrolyte and acid-base balance; and secreting hormones to maintain vital organ blood flow. Without properly functioning kidneys, a patient will suffer water retention, reduced urine flow and an accumulation of waste toxins in the blood and body. These conditions result from reduced renal function or renal failure (kidney failure) and are believed to increase the workload of the heart. In a CHF patient, renal failure will cause the heart to further deteriorate as fluids are retained and blood toxins accumulate due to the poorly functioning kidneys.
[0008] It has been established in animal models that the heart failure condition results in abnormally high sympathetic activation of the kidneys. An increase in renal sympathetic nerve activity leads to decreased removal of water and sodium from the body, as well as increased renin secretion. Increased renin secretion leads to vasoconstriction of blood vessels supplying the kidneys, which causes decreased renal blood flow. Reduction of sympathetic renal nerve activity, e.g., via denervation, may reverse these processes.
[0009] Applicants have previously described methods and apparatus for treating renal disorders by applying a pulsed electric field to neural fibers that contribute to renal function. See, for example, Applicants' co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. (a) 11/129,765, filed on May 13, 2005, (b) 11/189,563, filed on Jul. 25, 2005, and (c) 11/363,867, filed Feb. 27, 2006, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. A pulsed electric field (“PEF”) may initiate renal neuromodulation, e.g., denervation, for example, via irreversible electroporation or via electrofusion. The PEF may be delivered from apparatus positioned intravascularly, extravascularly, intra-to-extravascularly or a combination thereof. Additional methods and apparatus for achieving renal neuromodulation, e.g., via localized drug delivery (such as by a drug pump or infusion catheter) or via use of a stimulation electric field, etc, are described, for example, in co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/408,665, filed Apr. 8, 2003, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,978,174, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
[0010] A potential challenge of using PEF systems for treating renal disorders is to selectively electroporate target cells without affecting other cells. For example, it may be desirable to irreversibly electroporate renal nerve cells that travel along or in proximity to renal vasculature, but it may not be desirable to damage the smooth muscle cells of which the vasculature is composed. As a result, an overly aggressive course of PEF therapy may persistently injure the renal vasculature, but an overly conservative course of PEF therapy may not achieve the desired renal neuromodulation.
[0011] Applicants have previously described methods and apparatus for monitoring changes in tissue impedance or conductivity in order to determine the effects of pulsed electric field therapy, e.g., to determine an extent of electroporation and/or its degree of irreversibility. See, for example, Applicant's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/233,814, filed Sep. 23, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. However, in some patients it may be difficult or impractical to achieve such real-time monitoring when utilizing pulsed electric field neuromodulatory mechanisms. In some patients, this may necessitate re-intervention should it be established after the procedure that a degree of induced neuromodulation was not sufficient to achieve a desired treatment outcome. Thus, it would be desirable to achieve renal neuromodulation via more easily monitored and/or controlled neuromodulatory mechanisms.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0012] Several embodiments of the present invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
[0013] FIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating human renal anatomy.
[0014] FIG. 2 is a schematic isometric detail view showing the location of the renal nerves relative to the renal artery.
[0015] FIG. 3 is a schematic side view, partially in section, illustrating an example of an extravascular method and apparatus for thermal renal neuromodulation.
[0016] FIGS. 4A and 4B are schematic side views, partially in section, illustrating examples of intravascular methods and apparatus for thermal renal neuromodulation.
[0017] FIGS. 5A and 5B are schematic side views, partially in section, illustrating an alternative embodiment of the intravascular methods and apparatus of FIG. 4 comprising wall-contacting electrodes.
[0018] FIGS. 6A and 6B are schematic side views, partially in section, illustrating an additional alternative embodiment of the intravascular methods and apparatus of FIG. 4 comprising alternative wall-contacting electrodes.
[0019] FIGS. 7A and 7B are schematic side views, partially in section, illustrating other alternative embodiments of the intravascular methods and apparatus of FIG. 4 comprising multiple wall-contacting electrodes.
[0020] FIG. 8 is a schematic side view, partially in section, illustrating an example of an intra-to-extravascular method and apparatus for thermal renal neuromodulation.
[0021] FIG. 9 is a schematic side view, partially in section, of an alternative embodiment of the method and apparatus of FIG. 8 configured for thermal renal neuromodulation via direct application of thermal energy.
[0022] FIG. 10 is a schematic side view, partially in section, illustrating a method and apparatus for thermal renal neuromodulation comprising a thermoelectric element suitable for direct application of thermal energy to target neural fibers.
[0023] FIG. 11 is a schematic side view, partially in section, illustrating another method and apparatus for thermal renal neuromodulation comprising a thermoelectric element.
[0024] FIGS. 12A and 12B are schematic side views, partially in section, illustrating a method and apparatus for thermal renal neuromodulation via high-intensity focused ultrasound.
[0025] FIG. 13 is a schematic side view, partially in section, illustrating an alternative embodiment of the apparatus and method of FIG. 12 .
[0026] FIGS. 14A and 14B are schematic diagrams for classifying the various types of thermal neuromodulation that may be achieved with the apparatus and methods of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
A. Overview
[0027] The present invention provides methods and apparatus for renal neuromodulation via thermal heating and/or thermal cooling mechanisms, e.g., to achieve a reduction in renal sympathetic nerve activity. Thermally-induced (via heating and/or cooling) neuromodulation may be achieved via apparatus positioned proximate target neural fibers, for example, positioned within renal vasculature (i.e., positioned intravascularly), positioned extravascularly, positioned intra-to-extravascularly or a combination thereof. Thermal neuromodulation by either heating or cooling may be due to direct effect to, or alteration of, the neural structures that is induced by the thermal stress. Additionally or alternatively, the thermal neuromodulation may at least in part be due to alteration of vascular structures, e.g., arteries, arterioles, capillaries or veins, which perfuse the target neural fibers or surrounding tissue. Furtherstill, the modulation may at least in part be due to electroporation of the target neural fibers or of surrounding tissue.
[0028] As used herein, thermal heating mechanisms for neuromodulation include both thermal ablation and non-ablative thermal injury or damage (e.g., via sustained heating or resistive heating). Thermal heating mechanisms may include raising the temperature of target neural fibers above a desired threshold, for example, above a body temperature of about 37° C., e.g., to achieve non-ablative thermal injury, or above a temperature of about 45° C. (e.g., above about 60° C.) to achieve ablative thermal injury.
[0029] As used herein, thermal cooling mechanisms for neuromodulation include non-freezing thermal slowing of nerve conduction and/or non-freezing thermal nerve injury, as well as freezing thermal nerve injury. Thermal cooling mechanisms may include reducing the temperature of target neural fibers below a desired threshold, for example, below the body temperature of about 37° C. (e.g., below about 20° C.) to achieve non-freezing thermal injury. Thermal cooling mechanisms also may include reducing the temperature of the target neural fibers below about 0° C., e.g., to achieve freezing thermal injury.
[0030] In addition to monitoring or controlling the temperature during thermal neuromodulation, a length of exposure to thermal stimuli may be specified to affect an extent or degree of efficacy of the thermal neuromodulation. The length of exposure to thermal stimuli is longer than instantaneous exposure, such as longer than about 30 seconds, or even longer than 2 minutes. Furthermore, the length of exposure can be less than 10 minutes, though this should in no way be construed as the upper limit of the exposure period. Exposure times measured in hours, days or longer, may be utilized to achieve desired thermal neuromodulation.
[0031] When conducting neuromodulation via thermal mechanisms, the temperature threshold discussed previously may be determined as a function of the duration of exposure to thermal stimuli. Additionally or alternatively, the length of exposure may be determined as a function of the desired temperature threshold. These and other parameters may be specified or calculated to achieve and control desired thermal neuromodulation.
[0032] In some embodiments, thermally-induced renal neuromodulation may be achieved via direct application of thermal cooling or heating energy to the target neural fibers. For example, a chilled or heated fluid can be applied at least proximate to the target neural fiber, or heated or cooled elements (e.g., a thermoelectric element or a resistive heating element) can be placed in the vicinity of the neural fibers. In other embodiments, thermally-induced renal neuromodulation may be achieved via indirect generation and/or application of the thermal energy to the target neural fibers, such as through application of a ‘thermal’ electric field, of high-intensity focused ultrasound, of laser irradiation, etc., to the target neural fibers. For example, thermally-induced renal neuromodulation may be achieved via delivery of a pulsed or continuous thermal electric field to the target neural fibers, the electric field being of sufficient magnitude and/or duration to thermally induce the neuromodulation in the target fibers (e.g., to heat or thermally ablate or necrose the fibers). Additional and alternative methods and apparatus may be utilized to achieve thermally-induced renal neuromodulation, as described hereinafter.
[0033] When utilizing thermal heating mechanisms for thermal neuromodulation, protective cooling elements, such as convective cooling elements, optionally may be utilized to protect smooth muscle cells or other non-target tissue from thermal damage during the thermally-induced renal neuromodulation. Likewise, when utilizing thermal cooling mechanisms, protective heating elements, such as convective heating elements, may be utilized to protect the non-target tissue. When thermal neuromodulation is achieved via thermal energy delivered intravascularly, the non-target tissue may be protected by utilizing blood flow as a conductive and/or convective heat sink that carries away excess thermal energy (hot or cold). For example, when blood flow is not blocked, the circulating blood may provide a relatively constant temperature medium for removing the excess thermal energy from the non-target tissue during the procedure. The non-target tissue additionally or alternatively may be protected by focusing the thermal heating or cooling energy on the target neural fibers such that an intensity of the thermal energy is insufficient to induce the thermal damage in the non-target tissue distant from the target neural fibers.
[0034] In some embodiments, methods and apparatus for real-time monitoring of an extent or degree of neuromodulation or denervation (e.g., an extent or degree of thermal damage) in the target neural fibers and/or of thermal damage in the non-target tissue may be provided. Likewise, real-time monitoring of the thermal energy delivery element may be provided. Such methods and apparatus may, for example, comprise a thermocouple or other temperature sensor for measuring the temperature of the monitored tissue or of the thermal energy delivery element. Power or total energy delivered additionally or alternatively may be monitored.
[0035] To better understand the structures of devices of the present invention and the methods of using such devices for thermally-induce renal neuromodulation, it is instructive to examine the renal anatomy in humans.
B. Renal Anatomy Summary
[0036] With reference to FIG. 1 , the human renal anatomy includes the kidneys K, which are supplied with oxygenated blood by the renal arteries RA. The renal arteries are connected to the heart via the abdominal aorta AA. Deoxygenated blood flows from the kidneys to the heart via the renal veins RV and the inferior vena cava IVC.
[0037] FIG. 2 illustrates a portion of the renal anatomy in greater detail. More specifically, the renal anatomy also includes renal nerves RN extending longitudinally along the lengthwise dimension L of renal artery RA, generally within the adventitia of the artery. The renal artery RA has smooth muscle cells SMC that surround the arterial circumference and spiral around the angular axis θ of the artery. The smooth muscle cells of the renal artery accordingly have a lengthwise or longer dimension extending transverse (i.e., non-parallel) to the lengthwise dimension of the renal artery. The misalignment of the lengthwise dimensions of the renal nerves and the smooth muscle cells is defined as “cellular misalignment.”
C. Embodiments of Apparatus and Methods for Neuromodulation
[0038] FIGS. 3-13 illustrate examples of systems and methods for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation. FIG. 3 shows one embodiment of an extravascular apparatus 200 that includes one or more electrodes configured to deliver a thermal electric field to renal neural fibers in order to achieve renal neuromodulation via heating. The apparatus of FIG. 3 is configured for temporary extravascular placement; however, it should be understood that partially or completely implantable extravascular apparatus additionally or alternatively may be utilized. Applicants have previously described extravascular pulsed electric field systems, for example, in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/189,563, filed Jul. 25, 2005, which has been incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0039] In FIG. 3 , apparatus 200 comprises a laparoscopic or percutaneous system having a probe 210 configured for insertion in proximity to the track of the renal neural supply along the renal artery or vein or hilum and/or within Gerota's fascia under, e.g., CT or radiographic guidance. At least one electrode 212 is configured for delivery through the probe 210 to a treatment site for delivery of a thermal electric field therapy. The electrode(s) 212, for example, may be mounted on a catheter and electrically coupled to a thermal electric field generator 50 via wires 211. In an alternative embodiment, a distal section of the probe 210 may have at least one electrode 212, and the probe may have an electrical connector to couple the probe to the field generator 50 for delivering a thermal electric field to the electrode(s) 212.
[0040] The field generator 50 is located external to the patient. The generator, as well as any of the electrode embodiments described herein, may be utilized with any embodiment of the present invention for delivery of a thermal electric field with desired field parameters, e.g., parameters sufficient to thermally or otherwise induce renal neuromodulation in target neural fibers via heating and/or electroporation. It should be understood that electrodes of embodiments described hereinafter may be electrically connected to the generator even though the generator is not explicitly shown or described with each embodiment. Furthermore, the field generator optionally may be positioned internal to the patient. Furtherstill, the field generator may additionally comprise or may be substituted with an alternative thermal energy generator, such as a thermoelectric generator for heating or cooling (e.g., a Peltier device), or a thermal fluid injection system for heating or cooling, etc.
[0041] The electrode(s) 212 can be individual electrodes that are electrically independent of each other, a segmented electrode with commonly connected contacts, or a continuous electrode. A segmented electrode may, for example, be formed by providing a slotted tube fitted onto the electrode, or by electrically connecting a series of individual electrodes. Individual electrodes or groups of electrodes 212 may be configured to provide a bipolar signal. The electrodes 212 may be dynamically assignable to facilitate monopolar and/or bipolar energy delivery between any of the electrodes and/or between any of the electrodes and an external ground pad. Such a ground pad may, for example, be attached externally to the patient's skin, e.g., to the patient's leg or flank. In FIG. 3 , the electrodes 212 comprise a bipolar electrode pair. The probe 210 and the electrodes 212 may be similar to the standard needle or trocar-type used clinically for RF nerve block. Alternatively, the apparatus 200 may comprise a flexible and/or custom-designed probe for the renal application described herein.
[0042] In FIG. 3 , the percutaneous probe 210 has been advanced through a percutaneous access site P into proximity with a patient's renal artery RA. The probe pierces the patient's Gerota's fascia F, and the electrodes 212 are advanced into position through the probe and along the annular space between the patient's artery and fascia. Once properly positioned, the target neural fibers may be heated via a pulsed or continuous electric field delivered across the bipolar electrodes 212. Such heating may, for example, ablate or cause non-ablative thermal injury to the target neural fibers, thereby at least partially denervating the kidney innervated by the target neural fibers. The electric field also may induce reversible or irreversible electroporation in the target neural fibers, which may compliment the thermal injury induced in the neural fibers. After treatment, the apparatus 200 may be removed from the patient to conclude the procedure.
[0043] Referring now to FIGS. 4A and 4B , embodiments of intravascular systems for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation is described. Applicants have previously described intravascular pulsed electric field systems, for example, in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/129,765, filed May 13, 2005, which has been incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The embodiments of FIG. 4 include an apparatus 300 comprising a catheter 302 having an optional positioning element 304 (e.g., a balloon, an expandable wire basket, other mechanical expanders, etc.), shaft electrodes 306a and 306b disposed along the shaft of the catheter, and optional radiopaque markers 308 disposed along the shaft of the catheter in the region of the positioning element 304. The electrodes 306a-b, for example, can be arranged such that the electrode 306a is near a proximal end of the positioning element 304 and the electrode 306b is near the distal end of the positioning element 304. The electrodes 306 are electrically coupled to the field generator 50 (see FIG. 3 ), which is disposed external to the patient, for delivery of a thermal electric field for heating of target neural fibers. In an alternative embodiment, one or more of the electrodes may comprise Peltier electrodes for cooling the target neural fibers to modulate the fibers.
[0044] The positioning element 304 optionally may center or otherwise position the electrodes 306a and 306b within a vessel. Additionally, as in FIG. 4A , the positioning element may comprise an impedance-altering element that alters the impedance between electrodes 306a and 306b during the therapy, for example, to better direct the thermal electric field across the vessel wall. This may reduce an energy required to achieve desired renal neuromodulation and may reduce a risk of injury to non-target tissue. Applicants have previously described use of a suitable impedance-altering element in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/266,993, filed Nov. 4, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. When the positioning element 304 comprises an inflatable balloon as in FIG. 4A , the balloon may serve as both a centering element for the electrodes 306 and as an impedance-altering electrical insulator for directing an electric field delivered across the electrodes, e.g., for directing the electric field into or across the vessel wall for modulation of target neural fibers. Electrical insulation provided by the positioning element 304 may reduce the magnitude of applied energy or other parameters of the thermal electric field necessary to achieve desired heating at the target fibers.
[0045] Furthermore, the positioning element 304 optionally may be utilized as a cooling element and/or a heating element. For example, the positioning element 304 may be inflated with a chilled fluid that serves as a heat sink for removing heat from tissue that contacts the element. Conversely, the positioning element 304 optionally may be a heating element by inflating it with a warmed fluid that heats tissue in contact with the element. The thermal fluid optionally may be circulated and/or exchanged within the positioning element 304 to facilitate more efficient conductive and/or convective heat transfer. Thermal fluids also may be used to achieve thermal neuromodulation via thermal cooling or heating mechanisms, as described in greater detail herein below. The positioning element 304 (or any other portion of apparatus 300) additionally or alternatively may comprise one or more sensors for monitoring the process. In one embodiment, the positioning element 304 has a wall-contacting thermocouple 310 (FIG. 4A ) for monitoring the temperature or other parameters of the target tissue, the non-target tissue, the electrodes, the positioning element and/or any other portion of the apparatus 300.
[0046] The electrodes 306 can be individual electrodes (i.e., independent contacts), a segmented electrode with commonly connected contacts, or a single continuous electrode. Furthermore, the electrodes 306 may be configured to provide a bipolar signal, or the electrodes 306 may be used together or individually in conjunction with a separate patient ground pad for monopolar use. As an alternative or in addition to placement of the electrodes 306 along the central shaft of the catheter 302, as in FIG. 4 , the electrodes 306 may be attached to the positioning element 304 such that they contact the wall of the renal artery RA. In such a variation, the electrodes may, for example, be affixed to the inside surface, outside surface or at least partially embedded within the wall of the positioning element. FIG. 5 illustrate alternative wall-contacting electrodes.
[0047] In use, the catheter 302 may be delivered to the renal artery RA as shown, or it may be delivered to a renal vein or to any other vessel in proximity to neural tissue contributing to renal function, in a low profile delivery configuration through a guide catheter or other device. Alternatively, catheters may be positioned in multiple vessels for thermal renal neuromodulation, e.g., within both the renal artery and the renal vein. Multi-vessel techniques for pulsed electric field renal neuromodulation have been described previously, for example, in Applicant's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/451,728, filed Jul. 12, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0048] Once positioned within the renal vasculature as desired, the optional positioning element 304 may be expanded into contact with an interior wall of the vessel. A thermal electric field then may be generated by the field generator 50, transferred through the catheter 302 to the electrodes 306, and delivered via the electrodes 306 across the wall of the artery. The electric field thermally modulates the activity along neural fibers that contribute to renal function via heating. In several embodiments, the thermal modulation at least partially denervates the kidney innervated by the neural fibers via heating. This may be achieved, for example, via thermal ablation or via non-ablative damage of the target neural fibers. The electric field also may induce electroporation in the neural fibers.
[0049] In the embodiment of FIG. 4A , the positioning element 304 illustratively comprises an inflatable balloon, which may preferentially direct the electric field as discussed. In the embodiment of FIG. 4B , the positioning element comprises an expandable wire basket that substantially centers the electrodes 306 within the vessel without blocking blood flow through the vessel. During delivery of the thermal electric field (or of other thermal energy), the blood may act as a heat sink for conductive and/or convective heat transfer for removing excess thermal energy from the non-target tissue, thereby protecting the non-target tissue. This effect may be enhanced when blood flow is not blocked during energy delivery, as in the embodiment of FIG. 4B .
[0050] Use of the patient's blood as a heat sink is expected to facilitate delivery of longer or higher energy thermal treatments with reduced risk of damage to the non-target tissue, which may enhance the efficacy of the treatment at the target neural fibers. Although the embodiment of FIG. 4B illustratively comprises a positioning element for centering the electrodes without blocking flow, it should be understood that the positioning element may be eliminated and/or that the electrodes may be attached to the positioning element such that they are not centered in the vessel upon expansion of the centering element. In such embodiments, the patient's blood may still mitigate excess thermal heating or cooling to protect non-target tissues.
[0051] In addition or as an alternative to utilizing the patient's blood as a heat sink, a thermal fluid (hot or cold) may be injected into the vessel to remove excess thermal energy and protect the non-target tissues. The thermal fluid may, for example, be injected through the device catheter or through a guide catheter at a location upstream from an energy delivery element or at other locations relative to the tissue for which protection is sought. Furthermore, this method of using an injected thermal fluid to remove excess thermal energy from non-target tissues to protect the non-target tissues from thermal injury during therapeutic treatment of target tissues may be utilized in body lumens other than blood vessels.
[0052] One or more sensors, such as the thermocouple 310 of FIG. 4A , may be used to monitor the temperature(s) or other parameter(s) at the electrodes 306, at the wall of the vessel and/or at other desired locations along the apparatus or the patient's anatomy. The thermal neuromodulation may be controlled using the measured parameter(s) as feedback. This feedback may be used, for example, to maintain the parameter(s) below a desired threshold. For example, the parameter(s) may be maintained below a threshold that may cause injury to the non-target tissues. With blood flowing through the vessel, more thermal energy may be carried away, which may allow for longer or higher energy treatments than when blood flow is blocked in the vessel.
[0053] As discussed, when utilizing intravascular apparatus to achieve thermal neuromodulation, in addition or as an alternative to central positioning of the electrode(s) within a blood vessel, the electrode(s) optionally may be configured to contact an internal wall of the blood vessel. Wall-contacting electrode(s) may facilitate more efficient transfer of a thermal electric field across the vessel wall to target neural fibers, as compared to centrally-positioned electrode(s). In some embodiments, the wall-contacting electrode(s) may be delivered to the vessel treatment site in a reduced profile configuration, then expanded in vivo to a deployed configuration wherein the electrode(s) contact the vessel wall. In some embodiments, expansion of the electrode(s) is at least partially reversible to facilitate retrieval of the electrode(s) from the patient's vessel.
[0054] FIGS. 5A and 5B depict an illustrative embodiment of intravascular apparatus having electrodes configured to contact the interior wall of a vessel. The apparatus of FIGS. 5A and 5B is an alternative embodiment of the apparatus 300 of FIGS. 4A and 4B wherein the proximal electrode 306a of FIGS. 4A and 4B has been replaced with wall-contacting electrode 306a′. The wall-contacting electrode comprises proximal attachment 312a that connects the electrode to the shaft of the catheter 302 and is electrically coupled to the pulse generator. Extensions 314a extend from proximal attachment 312a and at least partially extend over a surface of positioning element 304. The extensions 314a optionally may be selectively insulated such that only a selective portion of the extensions, e.g., the distal tips of the extensions, are electrically active. The electrode 306a′ optionally may be fabricated from a slotted tube, such as a stainless steel or shape-memory (e.g., NiTi) slotted tube. Furthermore, all or a portion of the electrode may be gold-plated to improve radiopacity and/or conductivity.
[0055] As seen in FIG. 5A , catheter 302 may be delivered over a guidewire G to a treatment site within the patient's vessel with the electrode 306a′ positioned in a reduced profile configuration. Catheter 302 optionally may be delivered through a guide catheter 303 to facilitate such reduced profile delivery of the wall-contacting electrode. When positioned as desired at a treatment site, the electrode may be expanded into contact with the vessel wall by expanding the optional positioning element 304, as in FIG. 5B . A thermal monopolar or bipolar electric field then may be delivered across the vessel wall and between the electrodes 306a′ and 306b to induce thermal neuromodulation, as discussed previously. The optional positioning element 304 may alter impedance within the blood vessel and more efficiently route the electrical energy across the vessel wall to the target neural fibers.
[0056] After delivery of the electric field, the electrode 306a′ may be returned to a reduced profile to facilitate removal of the apparatus 300 from the patient. For example, the positioning element 304 may be collapsed (e.g., deflated), and the electrode 306a′ may be contracted by withdrawing the catheter 302 within the guide catheter 303. Alternatively, the electrode may be fabricated from a shape-memory material biased to the collapsed configuration, such that the electrode self-collapses upon collapse of the positioning element.
[0057] Although in FIGS. 5A and 5B the electrode 306a′ is expanded into contact with the vessel wall, it should be understood that the electrode alternatively may be fabricated from a self-expanding material biased such that the electrode self-expands into contact with the vessel wall upon positioning of the electrode distal of the guide catheter 303. A self-expanding embodiment of the electrode 306a′ may obviate a need for the positioning element 304 and/or may facilitate maintenance of blood flow through the blood vessel during delivery of an electric field via the electrode. After delivery of the electric field, the self-expanding electrode 306a′ may be returned to a reduced profile to facilitate removal of the apparatus 300 from the patient by withdrawing the catheter 302 within the guide catheter 303.
[0058] FIGS. 6A and 6B depict another embodiment of the apparatus and methods of FIGS. 4A and 4B comprising a wall-contacting electrode. As an alternative to the proximal attachment 312a of electrode 306a′ of FIGS. 5A and 5B , the electrode 306a″ of FIG. 6 comprises distal attachment 316a for coupling the electrode to the shaft of catheter 302 on the distal side of the positioning element 304. Distal attachment of the electrode allows the electrode to extend over the entirety of the positioning element 304 and may facilitate contraction of the electrode 306a″ after thermal neuromodulation. For example, the electrode 306a″ can be contracted by proximally retracting the extensions 312a relative to the catheter 302 during or after contraction of the positioning element 304. FIG. 6A shows the electrode 306a″ in the reduced profile configuration, while FIG. 6B shows the electrode in the expanded, wall-contacting configuration.
[0059] FIGS. 7A and 7B show additional alternative embodiments of the methods and apparatus of FIGS. 4A and 4B . In FIGS. 7A and 7B , the apparatus 300 comprises both the proximal electrode 306a′ of FIGS. 5A and 5B , as well as a wall-contacting distal electrode 306b′. The embodiment of FIG. 7A comprises proximal and distal positioning elements 304a and 304b, respectively, for expanding the proximal and distal wall-contacting electrodes 306a′ and 306b′, respectively, into contact with the vessel wall. The embodiment of FIG. 7B comprises only a single positioning element 304, but the distal wall-contacting electrode 306b′ is proximal facing and positioned over the distal portion of the positioning element 304 to facilitate expansion of the distal electrode 306b′. In the embodiment of FIG. 7B , the extensions of the proximal and distal electrodes optionally may be connected along non-conductive connectors 318 to facilitate collapse and retrieval of the electrodes post-treatment.
[0060] A bipolar electric field may be delivered between the proximal and distal wall-contacting electrodes, or a monopolar electric field may be delivered between the proximal and/or distal electrode(s) and an external ground. Having both the proximal and distal electrodes in contact with the wall of the vessel may facilitate more efficient energy transfer across the wall during delivery of a thermal electric field, as compared to having one or both of the proximal and distal electrodes centered within the vessel.
[0061] In addition to extravascular and intravascular systems for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation, intra-to-extravascular systems may be provided. The intra-to-extravascular systems may, for example, have electrode(s) that are delivered to an intravascular position, and then at least partially passed through/across the vessel wall to an extravascular position prior to delivery of a thermal electric field. Intra-to-extravascular positioning of the electrode(s) may place the electrode(s) in closer proximity to target neural fibers for delivery of a thermal electric field, as compared to fully intravascular positioning of the electrode(s). Applicants have previously described intra-to-extravascular pulsed electric field systems, for example, in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/324,188, filed Dec. 29, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0062] With reference to FIG. 8 , one embodiment of an intra-to-extravascular (“ITEV”) system for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation is described. ITEV system 320 comprises a catheter 322 having (a) a plurality of proximal electrode lumens terminating at proximal side ports 324, (b) a plurality of distal electrode lumens terminating at distal side ports 326, and (c) a guidewire lumen 323. The catheter 322 preferably comprises an equal number of proximal and distal electrode lumens and side ports. The system 320 also includes proximal needle electrodes 328 that may be advanced through the proximal electrode lumens and the proximal side ports 324, as well as distal needle electrodes 329 that may be advanced through the distal electrode lumens and the distal side ports 326.
[0063] Catheter 322 comprises an optional expandable positioning element 330, which may comprise an inflatable balloon or an expandable basket or cage. In use, the positioning element 330 may be expanded prior to deployment of the needle electrodes 328 and 329 in order to position or center the catheter 322 within the patient's vessel (e.g., within renal artery RA). Centering the catheter 322 is expected to facilitate delivery of all needle electrodes to desired depths within/external to the patient's vessel (e.g., to deliver all of the needle electrodes approximately to the same depth). In FIG. 8 , the illustrated positioning element 330 is positioned between the proximal side ports 324 and the distal side ports 326, i.e., between the delivery positions of the proximal and distal electrodes. However, it should be understood that the positioning element 330 additionally or alternatively may be positioned at a different location or at multiple locations along the length of the catheter 322 (e.g., at a location proximal of the side ports 324 and/or at a location distal of the side ports 326).
[0064] As illustrated in FIG. 8 , the catheter 322 may be advanced to a treatment site within the patient's vasculature (e.g., to a treatment site within the patient's renal artery RA) over a guidewire (not shown) via the lumen 323. During intravascular delivery, the electrodes 328 and 329 may be positioned such that their non-insulated and sharpened distal regions are positioned within the proximal and distal lumens, respectively. Once positioned at a treatment site, a medical practitioner may advance the electrodes via their proximal regions that are located external to the patient. Such advancement causes the distal regions of the electrodes 328 and 329 to exit side ports 324 and 326, respectively, and pierce the wall of the patient's vasculature such that the electrodes are positioned extravascularly via an ITEV approach.
[0065] The proximal electrodes 328 can be connected to electric field generator 50 as active electrodes, and the distal electrodes 329 can serve as return electrodes. In this manner, the proximal and distal electrodes form bipolar electrode pairs that align the thermal electric field with a longitudinal axis or direction of the patient's vasculature. As will be apparent, the distal electrodes 329 alternatively may comprise the active electrodes and the proximal electrodes 328 may comprise the return electrodes. Furthermore, the proximal and/or the distal electrodes may comprise both active and return electrodes. Furtherstill, the proximal and/or the distal electrodes may be utilized in combination with an external ground for delivery of a monopolar thermal electric field. Any combination of active and distal electrodes may be utilized, as desired.
[0066] When the electrodes 328 and 329 are connected to generator 50 and positioned extravascularly, and with the positioning element 330 optionally expanded, delivery of the thermal electric field may proceed to achieve desired renal neuromodulation via heating. The electric field also may induce electroporation. After achievement of the thermally-induced renal neuromodulation, the electrodes may be retracted within the proximal and distal lumens, and the positioning element 330 may be collapsed for retrieval. ITEV system 320 then may be removed from the patient to complete the procedure. Additionally or alternatively, the system may be repositioned to provide therapy at another treatment site, such as to provide bilateral renal neuromodulation.
[0067] As discussed previously, cooling elements, such as convective cooling elements, may be utilized to protect non-target tissues like smooth muscle cells from thermal damage during thermally-induced renal neuromodulation via heat generation. Non-target tissues additionally or alternatively may be protected by focusing the thermal energy on the target neural fibers such that an intensity of the thermal energy is insufficient to induce thermal damage in non-target tissues distant from the target neural fibers.
[0068] Although FIGS. 3-8 illustratively show bipolar apparatus, it should be understood that monopolar apparatus alternatively may be utilized. For example, an active monopolar electrode may be positioned intravascularly, extravascularly or intra-to-extravascularly in proximity to target neural fibers that contribute to renal function. A return electrode ground pad may be attached to the exterior of the patient. Finally, a thermal electric field may be delivered between the in vivo monopolar electrode and the ex vivo ground pad to effectuate desired thermally-induced renal neuromodulation. Monopolar apparatus additionally may be utilized for bilateral renal neuromodulation.
[0069] The embodiments of FIGS. 3-8 illustratively describe methods and apparatus for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation via delivery of thermal electric fields that modulate the target neural fibers. However, it should be understood that alternative methods and apparatus for thermally-induced (via both heating and cooling) renal neuromodulation may be provided. For example, electric fields may be used to cool and modulate the neural fibers, e.g., via thermoelectric or Peltier elements. Thermally-induced renal neuromodulation optionally may be achieved via direct application of thermal energy to the target neural fibers. Such direct thermal energy may be generated and/or transferred in a variety of ways, such as via resistive heating, via delivery of a heated or chilled fluid (see FIGS. 9 and 11 ), via a Peltier element (see FIG. 10 ), etc. Thermally-induced renal neuromodulation additionally or alternatively may be achieved via application of high-intensity focused ultrasound to the target neural fibers (see FIG. 12 ). Additional and alternative methods and apparatus for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation may be used in accordance with the present invention.
[0070] With reference now to FIG. 9 , an alternative embodiment of the apparatus and methods of FIG. 8 is described that is configured for thermally-induced neuromodulation via direct application of thermal energy. In the embodiment of FIG. 9 , the electrodes 328 and 329 of FIG. 8 have been replaced with infusion needles 328′ and 329′, respectively. A thermal fluid F may be delivered through the needles to the target neural fibers. The thermal fluid may be heated in order to raise the temperature of the target neural fibers above a desired threshold. For example, the temperature of the neural fibers can be raised above a body temperature of about 37° C., or above a temperature of about 45° C. Alternatively, the thermal fluid may be chilled to reduce the temperature of the target neural fibers below a desired threshold. For example, the neural fibers can be cooled to below the body temperature of about 37° C., or further cooled below about 20° C., or still further cooled below a freezing temperature of about 0° C. As will be apparent, in addition to intra-to-extravascular delivery of a thermal fluid, the thermal fluid may be delivered intravascularly (e.g., may inflate and/or be circulated through a balloon member), extravascularly (e.g., may be circulated through a vascular cuff) or a combination thereof.
[0071] In addition or as alternative to injection of a thermal fluid to the target neural fibers through infusion needles 328′ and 329′, an alternative neuromodulatory agent, such as a drug or medicament, may be injected to modulate, necrose or otherwise block or reduce transmission along the target neural fibers. Examples of alternative neuromodulatory agents include, but are not limited to, phenol and neurotoxins, such as botulinum toxin. Additional neuromodulatory agents, per se known, will be apparent to those of skill in the art.
[0072] FIG. 10 shows another method and apparatus for thermal renal neuromodulation via direct application of thermal energy to the target neural fibers. The apparatus 340 comprises renal artery cuff 342 having one or more integrated thermoelectric elements that are electrically coupled to an internal or external power supply 344. The thermoelectric element utilizes the well-known Peltier effect (i.e., the establishment of a thermal gradient induced by an electric voltage) to achieve thermal renal neuromodulation.
[0073] An electric current is passed from the power supply to the thermoelectric element, which comprises two different metals (e.g., a p-type and an n-type semiconductor) that are connected to each other at two junctions. The current induces a thermal gradient between the two junctions, such that one junction cools while the other is heated. Reversal of the polarity of the voltage applied across the two junctions reverses the direction of the thermal gradient.
[0074] Either the hot side or the cold side of the thermoelectric element faces radially inward in order to heat or cool, respectively, the target neural fibers that travel along the renal artery to achieve thermal renal neuromodulation. Optionally, the radially outward surface of the thermoelectric element may be insulated to reduce a risk of thermal damage to the non-target tissues. The cuff 342 may comprise one or more temperature sensors, such as thermocouples, for monitoring the temperature of the target neural fibers and/or of the non-target tissues.
[0075] FIG. 11 shows another method and apparatus utilizing the Peltier effect. The apparatus 350 comprises an implanted or external pump 352 connected to a renal artery cuff 354 via inlet fluid conduit 356a and outlet fluid conduit 356b. The inlet fluid conduit transfers fluid from the pump to the cuff, while the outlet fluid conduit transfers fluid from the cuff to the pump to circulate fluid through the cuff. A reservoir of fluid may be located in the cuff, the pump and/or in the fluid conduits.
[0076] The pump 352 further comprises one or more thermoelectric or other thermal elements in heat exchange contact with the fluid reservoir for cooling or heating the fluid that is transferred to the cuff to thermally modulate the target neural fibers. The apparatus 350 optionally may have controls for automatic or manual control of fluid heating or cooling, as well as fluid circulation within the cuff. Furthermore, the apparatus may comprise temperature and/or renal sympathetic neural activity monitoring or feedback control. Although the apparatus illustratively is shown unilaterally treating neural fibers innervating a single kidney, it should be understood that bilateral treatment of neural fibers innervating both kidneys alternatively may be provided.
[0077] Thermal renal neuromodulation alternatively may be achieved via high-intensity focused ultrasound, either pulsed or continuous. High intensity focused ultrasound also may induce reversible or irreversible electroporation in the target neural fibers. Furthermore, the ultrasound may be delivered over a full 360° (e.g. when delivered intravascularly) or over a radial segment of less than 360° (e.g., when delivered intravascularly, extravascularly, intra-to-extravascularly, or a combination thereof). In FIG. 12 , the apparatus 360 comprises a catheter 362 having ultrasound transducers 364 positioned along the shaft of the catheter within an inflatable balloon 366. The ultrasound transducers are coupled to an ultrasound signal generator via conductors 365. The balloon comprises an acoustically reflective portion 368 of a surface of the balloon for reflecting an ultrasound wave, as well as an acoustically transmissive portion 369 of the surface for passage of the wave through the balloon. In this manner, the wave may be focused as shown at a focal point or radius P positioned a desired focal distance from the catheter shaft. In an alternative embodiment, the transducers may be attached directly to the balloon.
[0078] The focal distance may be specified or dynamically variable such that, when positioned within a blood vessel, the ultrasonic wave is focused at a desired depth on target neural fibers outside of the vessel. For example, a family of catheter sizes may be provided to allow for a range of specified focal distances. A dynamically variable focal distance may be achieved, for example, via calibrated expansion of the balloon.
[0079] Focusing the ultrasound wave may produce a reverse thermal gradient that protects the non-target tissues and selectively affect the target neural fibers to achieve thermal renal neuromodulation via heating. As a result, the temperature at the vessel wall may be less than the temperature at the target tissue. FIG. 12A shows the apparatus 360 in a reduced delivery and retrieval configuration, while FIG. 12B shows the apparatus in an expanded deployed configuration. FIG. 13 shows an alternative embodiment of the apparatus 360 wherein the ultrasound transducers 364′ are concave, such that the ultrasound signal is self-focusing without need of the reflective portion of the balloon 366 (e.g., the balloon may be acoustically transmissive at all points).
[0080] The apparatus described above with respect to FIGS. 3-13 optionally may be used to quantify the efficacy, extent or cell selectivity of thermally-induced renal neuromodulation in order to monitor and/or control the neuromodulation. As discussed previously, the apparatus may further comprise one or more sensors, such as thermocouples or imaging transducers, for measuring and monitoring one or more parameters of the apparatus, of the target neural fibers and/or of the non-target tissues. For example, a temperature rise or drop above or below certain thresholds is expected to thermally ablate, non-ablatively injure, freeze or otherwise damage the target neural fibers, thereby modulating the target neural fibers.
[0081] FIGS. 14A and 14B classify the various types of thermal neuromodulation that may be achieved with the apparatus and methods of the present invention. FIGS. 14A and 14B are provided only for the sake of illustration and should in no way be construed as limiting. FIG. 14A classifies thermal neuromodulation due to heat exposure. As shown, exposure to heat in excess of a body temperature of about 37° C., but below a temperature of about 45° C., may induce thermal injury via moderate heating of the target neural fibers or of vascular structures that perfuse the target fibers. For example, this may induce non-ablative thermal injury in the fibers or structures. Exposure to heat above a temperature of about 45° C., or above about 60° C., may induce thermal injury via substantial heating of the fibers or structures. For example, such higher temperatures may thermally ablate the target neural fibers or the vascular structures. Regardless of the type of heat exposure utilized to induce the thermal neuromodulation, a reduction in renal sympathetic nerve activity (“RSNA”) is expected.
[0082] As seen in FIG. 14B , thermal cooling for neuromodulation includes non-freezing thermal slowing of nerve conduction and/or nerve injury, as well as freezing thermal nerve injury. Non-freezing thermal cooling may include reducing the temperature of the target neural fibers or of the vascular structures that feed the fibers to temperatures below the body temperature of about 37° C., or below about 20° C., but above the freezing temperature of about 0° C. This non-freezing thermal cooling may either slow nerve conduction or may cause direct neural injury. Slowed nerve conduction may imply continuous or intermittent cooling of the target neural fibers to sustain the desired thermal neuromodulation, while direct neural injury may require only a discrete treatment to achieve sustained thermal neuromodulation. Thermal cooling for neuromodulation also may include freezing thermal nerve injury, e.g., reducing the temperature of the target neural fibers or of the vascular structures that feed the fibers to temperatures below the freezing point of about 0° C. Regardless of the type of cold exposure utilized to induce the thermal neuromodulation (freezing or non-freezing), a reduction in renal sympathetic nerve activity (“RSNA”) is expected.
[0083] It is expected that thermally-induced renal neuromodulation, whether delivered extravascularly, intravascularly, intra-to-extravascularly or a combination thereof, may alleviate clinical symptoms of CHF, hypertension, renal disease, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, contrast nephropathy and/or other cardio-renal diseases for a period of months, potentially up to six months or more. This time period may be sufficient to allow the body to heal; for example, this period may reduce the risk of CHF onset after an acute myocardial infarction, thereby alleviating a need for subsequent re-treatment. Alternatively, as symptoms reoccur, or at regularly scheduled intervals, the patient may receive repeat therapy.
[0084] Although preferred illustrative variations of the present invention are described above, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the invention. It is intended in the appended claims to cover all such changes and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims
Post-issuance certificates present
The text shown below may not reflect later post-issuance changes.
We claim:
1. A method for thermally-induced renal neuromodulation, the method comprising:
delivering a device to a vicinity of a neural fiber that contributes to renal function; and
thermally inducing modulation of a function of the neural fiber with the device.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein delivering the device further comprises delivering the device via an approach chosen from the group consisting of intravascularly, extravascularly, intra-to-extravascularly and combinations thereof.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein thermally inducing modulation of a function of the neural fiber further comprises directly applying thermal energy to the neural fiber.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein thermally inducing modulation of a function of the neural fiber further comprises indirectly applying thermal energy to the neural fiber.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein thermally inducing modulation of a function of the neural fiber further comprises delivering a thermal electric field to the neural fiber via at least one electrode.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein delivering a device to a vicinity of the neural fiber further comprises intravascularly delivering the device, and wherein delivering a thermal electric field to the neural fiber via at least one electrode further comprises delivering the thermal electric field via at least one wall-contacting electrode.
7. The method of claim 1 further comprising monitoring a parameter of the neural fiber, of non-target tissue or of the device during thermally-induced modulation of the function of the neural fiber.
8. The method of claim 7 further comprising controlling the thermally-induced modulation in response to the monitored parameter.
9. The method of claim 1 further comprising actively protecting non-target tissue during thermally-induced modulation of the function of the neural fiber.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein actively protecting the non-target tissue further comprises reducing a degree of thermal damage induced in the non-target tissue.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein thermally inducing modulation of a function of the neural fiber further comprises delivering a thermal fluid to a vicinity of the neural fiber.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein thermally inducing modulation of a function of the neural fiber further comprises exchanging heat with the neural fiber via a thermoelectric element.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein thermally inducing modulation of a function of the neural fiber further comprises delivering high intensity focused ultrasound to the neural fiber.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein thermally inducing modulation of the function of the neural fiber further comprises heating the neural fiber.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein thermally inducing modulation of the function of the neural fiber further comprises cooling the neural fiber.
Patent Citations (455)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2130758(A) | 1938-09-01 | Rose | Applicant |
| US2276995(A) | 1942-03-01 | Milinowski | Applicant |
| US2276996(A) | 1942-03-01 | Milinowski | Applicant |
| US3043310(A) | 1962-07-01 | Milinowski | Applicant |
| US3127895(A) | 1964-04-01 | Kendall et al. | Applicant |
| US3181535(A) | 1965-05-01 | Milinowski | Applicant |
| US3270746(A) | 1966-09-01 | Kendall et al. | Applicant |
| US3329149(A) | 1967-07-01 | Kendall et al. | Applicant |
| US3522811(A) | 1970-08-01 | Schwartz et al. | Applicant |
| US3563246(A) | 1971-02-01 | Puharich et al. | Applicant |
| US3650277(A) | 1972-03-01 | Sjostrand et al. | Applicant |
| US3670737(A) | 1972-06-01 | Pearo | Applicant |
| US3760812(A) | 1973-09-01 | Timm et al. | Applicant |
| US3774620(A) | 1973-11-01 | Hansjurgens | Applicant |
| US3794022(A) | 1974-02-01 | Nawracaj et al. | Applicant |
| US3800802(A) | 1974-04-01 | Berry et al. | Applicant |
| US3803463(A) | 1974-04-01 | Cover | Applicant |
| US3894532(A) | 1975-07-01 | Morey | Applicant |
| US3895639(A) | 1975-07-01 | Rodler | Applicant |
| US3897789(A) | 1975-08-01 | Blanchard | Applicant |
| US3911930(A) | 1975-10-01 | Hagfors et al. | Applicant |
| US3952751(A) | 1976-04-01 | Yarger | Applicant |
| US3987790(A) | 1976-10-01 | Eckenhoff et al. | Applicant |
| US4011861(A) | 1977-03-01 | Enger | Applicant |
| US4026300(A) | 1977-05-01 | DeLuca et al. | Applicant |
| US4055190(A) | 1977-10-01 | Tany | Applicant |
| US4071033(A) | 1978-01-01 | Nawracaj et al. | Applicant |
| US4105017(A) | 1978-08-01 | Ryaby et al. | Applicant |
| US4141365(A) | 1979-02-01 | Fischell et al. | Applicant |
| US4266532(A) | 1981-05-01 | Ryaby et al. | Applicant |
| US4266533(A) | 1981-05-01 | Ryaby et al. | Applicant |
| US4305115(A) | 1981-12-01 | Armitage | Applicant |
| US4315503(A) | 1982-02-01 | Ryaby et al. | Applicant |
| US4360019(A) | 1982-11-01 | Portner et al. | Applicant |
| US4379462(A) | 1983-04-01 | Borkan et al. | Applicant |
| US4405305(A) | 1983-09-01 | Stephen et al. | Applicant |
| US4454883(A) | 1984-06-01 | Fellus | Applicant |
| US4467808(A) | 1984-08-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US4487603(A) | 1984-12-01 | Harris | Applicant |
| US4530840(A) | 1985-07-01 | Tice et al. | Applicant |
| US4587975(A) | 1986-05-01 | Salo et al. | Applicant |
| US4608985(A) | 1986-09-01 | Crish et al. | Applicant |
| US4649936(A) | 1987-03-01 | Ungar et al. | Applicant |
| US4671286(A) | 1987-06-01 | Renault | Applicant |
| US4674482(A) | 1987-06-01 | Waltonen et al. | Applicant |
| US4692147(A) | 1987-09-01 | Duggan | Applicant |
| US4715852(A) | 1987-12-01 | Reinicke et al. | Applicant |
| US4774967(A) | 1988-10-01 | Zanakis | Applicant |
| US4791931(A) | 1988-12-01 | Slate | Applicant |
| US4816016(A) | 1989-03-01 | Schulte et al. | Applicant |
| US4852573(A) | 1989-08-01 | Kennedy | Applicant |
| US4865845(A) | 1989-09-01 | Eckenhoff et al. | Applicant |
| US4979511(A) | 1990-12-01 | Terry, Jr. | Applicant |
| US4981146(A) | 1991-01-01 | Bertolucci | Applicant |
| US4998532(A) | 1991-03-01 | Griffith | Applicant |
| US5006119(A) | 1991-04-01 | Acker et al. | Applicant |
| US5014699(A) | 1991-05-01 | Pollack et al. | Applicant |
| US5057318(A) | 1991-10-01 | Magruder et al. | Applicant |
| US5058584(A) | 1991-10-01 | Bourgeois | Applicant |
| US5059423(A) | 1991-10-01 | Magruder et al. | Applicant |
| US5061492(A) | 1991-10-01 | Okada et al. | Applicant |
| US5094242(A) | 1992-03-01 | Gleason et al. | Applicant |
| US5111815(A) | 1992-05-01 | Mower | Applicant |
| US5112614(A) | 1992-05-01 | Magruder et al. | Applicant |
| US5125928(A) | 1992-06-01 | Parins et al. | Applicant |
| US5131409(A) | 1992-07-01 | Lobarev et al. | Applicant |
| US5137727(A) | 1992-08-01 | Eckenhoff | Applicant |
| US5188837(A) | 1993-02-01 | Domb | Applicant |
| US5193048(A) | 1993-03-01 | Kaufman et al. | Applicant |
| US5193539(A) | 1993-03-01 | Schulman et al. | Applicant |
| US5193540(A) | 1993-03-01 | Schulman et al. | Applicant |
| US5199428(A) | 1993-04-01 | Obel et al. | Applicant |
| US5203326(A) | 1993-04-01 | Collins et al. | Applicant |
| US5213098(A) | 1993-05-01 | Bennett et al. | Applicant |
| US5215086(A) | 1993-06-01 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5231988(A) | 1993-08-01 | Wernicke et al. | Applicant |
| US5234692(A) | 1993-08-01 | Magruder et al. | Applicant |
| US5234693(A) | 1993-08-01 | Magruder et al. | Applicant |
| US5251634(A) | 1993-10-01 | Weinberg | Applicant |
| US5251643(A) | 1993-10-01 | Osypka | Applicant |
| US5263480(A) | 1993-11-01 | Wernicke et al. | Applicant |
| US5269303(A) | 1993-12-01 | Wernicke et al. | Applicant |
| US5282468(A) | 1994-02-01 | Klepinski | Applicant |
| US5282785(A) | 1994-02-01 | Shapland et al. | Applicant |
| US5286254(A) | 1994-02-01 | Shapland et al. | Applicant |
| US5299569(A) | 1994-04-01 | Wernicke et al. | Applicant |
| US5304120(A) | 1994-04-01 | Crandell et al. | Applicant |
| US5304206(A) | 1994-04-01 | Baker | Applicant |
| US5317155(A) | 1994-05-01 | King | Applicant |
| US5324255(A) | 1994-06-01 | Passafaro et al. | Applicant |
| US5324316(A) | 1994-06-01 | Schulman et al. | Applicant |
| US5334193(A) | 1994-08-01 | Nardella | Applicant |
| US5335657(A) | 1994-08-01 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5338662(A) | 1994-08-01 | Sadri | Applicant |
| US5351394(A) | 1994-10-01 | Weinberg | Applicant |
| US5358514(A) | 1994-10-01 | Schulman et al. | Applicant |
| US5370680(A) | 1994-12-01 | Proctor | Applicant |
| US5389069(A) | 1995-02-01 | Weaver | Applicant |
| US5397308(A) | 1995-03-01 | Ellis et al. | Applicant |
| US5397338(A) | 1995-03-01 | Grey et al. | Applicant |
| US5400784(A) | 1995-03-01 | Durand et al. | Applicant |
| US5405367(A) | 1995-04-01 | Schulman et al. | Applicant |
| US5429634(A) | 1995-07-01 | Narciso, Jr. | Applicant |
| US5433739(A) | 1995-07-01 | Sluijter et al. | Applicant |
| US5439440(A) | 1995-08-01 | Hofmann | Applicant |
| US5454782(A) | 1995-10-01 | Perkins | Applicant |
| US5454809(A) | 1995-10-01 | Janssen | Applicant |
| US5458568(A) | 1995-10-01 | Racchini et al. | Applicant |
| US5458626(A) | 1995-10-01 | Krause | Applicant |
| US5458631(A) | 1995-10-01 | Xavier | Applicant |
| US5472406(A) | 1995-12-01 | de la Torre et al. | Applicant |
| US5478303(A) | 1995-12-01 | Foley-Nolan et al. | Applicant |
| US5494822(A) | 1996-02-01 | Sadri | Applicant |
| US5498238(A) | 1996-03-01 | Shapland et al. | Applicant |
| US5499971(A) | 1996-03-01 | Shapland et al. | Applicant |
| US5507724(A) | 1996-04-01 | Hofmann et al. | Applicant |
| US5507791(A) | 1996-04-01 | Sit'ko | Applicant |
| US5531778(A) | 1996-07-01 | Maschino et al. | Applicant |
| US5540730(A) | 1996-07-01 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5540734(A) | 1996-07-01 | Zabara | Applicant |
| US5560360(A) | 1996-10-01 | Filler et al. | Applicant |
| US5569198(A) | 1996-10-01 | Racchini | Applicant |
| US5571147(A) | 1996-11-01 | Sluijter et al. | Applicant |
| US5571150(A) | 1996-11-01 | Wernicke et al. | Applicant |
| US5573552(A) | 1996-11-01 | Hansjurgens | Applicant |
| US5584863(A) | 1996-12-01 | Rauch et al. | Applicant |
| US5589192(A) | 1996-12-01 | Okabe et al. | Applicant |
| US5618563(A) | 1997-04-01 | Berde et al. | Applicant |
| US5626576(A) | 1997-05-01 | Janssen | Applicant |
| US5626862(A) | 1997-05-01 | Brem et al. | Applicant |
| US5628730(A) | 1997-05-01 | Shapland et al. | Applicant |
| US5634462(A) | 1997-06-01 | Tyler et al. | Applicant |
| US5634899(A) | 1997-06-01 | Shapland et al. | Applicant |
| US5689877(A) | 1997-11-01 | Grill, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5690691(A) | 1997-11-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US5700282(A) | 1997-12-01 | Zabara | Applicant |
| US5700485(A) | 1997-12-01 | Berde et al. | Applicant |
| US5704908(A) | 1998-01-01 | Hofmann et al. | Applicant |
| US5707400(A) | 1998-01-01 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5711326(A) | 1998-01-01 | Thies et al. | Applicant |
| US5713847(A) | 1998-02-01 | Howard, III et al. | Applicant |
| US5723001(A) | 1998-03-01 | Pilla et al. | Applicant |
| US5725563(A) | 1998-03-01 | Klotz et al. | Applicant |
| US5728396(A) | 1998-03-01 | Peery et al. | Applicant |
| US5747060(A) | 1998-05-01 | Sackler et al. | Applicant |
| US5755750(A) | 1998-05-01 | Petruska et al. | Applicant |
| US5756115(A) | 1998-05-01 | Moo-Young et al. | Applicant |
| US5792187(A) | 1998-08-01 | Adams | Applicant |
| US5800464(A) | 1998-09-01 | Kieval | Applicant |
| US5807306(A) | 1998-09-01 | Shapland et al. | Applicant |
| US5814079(A) | 1998-09-01 | Kieval | Applicant |
| US5824087(A) | 1998-10-01 | Aspden et al. | Applicant |
| US5836935(A) | 1998-11-01 | Ashton et al. | Applicant |
| USRE35987(E) | 1998-12-01 | Harris et al. | Applicant |
| US5843069(A) | 1998-12-01 | Butler et al. | Applicant |
| US5861021(A) | 1999-01-01 | Thome et al. | Applicant |
| US5865787(A) | 1999-02-01 | Shapland et al. | Applicant |
| US5871449(A) | 1999-02-01 | Brown | Applicant |
| US5891181(A) | 1999-04-01 | Zhu | Applicant |
| US5906636(A) | 1999-05-01 | Casscells, III et al. | Applicant |
| US5906817(A) | 1999-05-01 | Moullier et al. | Applicant |
| US5913876(A) | 1999-06-01 | Taylor et al. | Applicant |
| US5916154(A) | 1999-06-01 | Hobbs et al. | Applicant |
| US5916239(A) | 1999-06-01 | Geddes et al. | Applicant |
| US5919187(A) | 1999-07-01 | Guglielmi et al. | Applicant |
| US5924997(A) | 1999-07-01 | Campbell | Applicant |
| US5928272(A) | 1999-07-01 | Adkins et al. | Applicant |
| US5935075(A) | 1999-08-01 | Casscells et al. | Applicant |
| US5944710(A) | 1999-08-01 | Dev et al. | Applicant |
| US5983131(A) | 1999-11-01 | Weaver et al. | Applicant |
| US5983141(A) | 1999-11-01 | Sluijter et al. | Applicant |
| US6006134(A) | 1999-12-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US6010613(A) | 2000-01-01 | Walters et al. | Applicant |
| US6026326(A) | 2000-02-01 | Bardy | Applicant |
| US6051017(A) | 2000-04-01 | Loeb et al. | Applicant |
| US6058328(A) | 2000-05-01 | Levine et al. | Applicant |
| US6058331(A) | 2000-05-01 | King | Applicant |
| US6073048(A) | 2000-06-01 | Kieval et al. | Applicant |
| US6077227(A) | 2000-06-01 | Miesel et al. | Applicant |
| US6086527(A) | 2000-07-01 | Talpade | Applicant |
| US6122548(A) | 2000-09-01 | Starkebaum et al. | Applicant |
| US6123718(A) | 2000-09-01 | Tu et al. | Applicant |
| US6146380(A) | 2000-11-01 | Racz et al. | Applicant |
| US6161048(A) | 2000-12-01 | Sluijter et al. | Applicant |
| US6178349(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Kieval | Applicant |
| US6192889(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Morrish | Applicant |
| US6205361(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Kuzma et al. | Applicant |
| US6208894(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Schulman et al. | Applicant |
| US6214032(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Loeb et al. | Applicant |
| US6219577(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Brown, III et al. | Applicant |
| US6238702(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Berde et al. | Applicant |
| US6245026(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Campbell et al. | Applicant |
| US6251130(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Dobak, III et al. | Applicant |
| US6258087(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US6259952(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Sluijter et al. | Applicant |
| US6269269(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Ottenhoff et al. | Applicant |
| US6272377(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Sweeney et al. | Applicant |
| US6272383(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Grey et al. | Applicant |
| US6280377(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Talpade | Applicant |
| US6287304(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Eggers et al. | Applicant |
| US6287608(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Levin et al. | Applicant |
| US6292695(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Webster, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US6304777(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Ben-Haim et al. | Applicant |
| US6304787(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Kuzma et al. | Applicant |
| US6306423(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Donovan et al. | Applicant |
| US6326020(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Kohane et al. | Applicant |
| US6326177(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Schoenbach et al. | Applicant |
| US6334069(B1) | 2001-12-01 | George et al. | Applicant |
| US6347247(B1) | 2002-02-01 | Dev et al. | Applicant |
| US6353763(B1) | 2002-03-01 | George et al. | Applicant |
| US6356786(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Rezai et al. | Applicant |
| US6356787(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Rezai et al. | Applicant |
| US6366808(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Schroeppel et al. | Applicant |
| US6366815(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Haugland et al. | Applicant |
| US6393324(B2) | 2002-05-01 | Gruzdowich et al. | Applicant |
| US6400982(B2) | 2002-06-01 | Sweeney et al. | Applicant |
| US6405079(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Ansarinia | Applicant |
| US6405732(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Edwards et al. | Applicant |
| US6415183(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Scheiner et al. | Applicant |
| US6415187(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Kuzma et al. | Applicant |
| US6438423(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Rezai et al. | Applicant |
| US6442424(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Ben-Haim et al. | Applicant |
| US6449507(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US6450942(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Lapanashvili et al. | Applicant |
| US6461314(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Pant et al. | Applicant |
| US6464687(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Ishikawa et al. | Applicant |
| US6473644(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US6482619(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Rubinsky et al. | Applicant |
| US6508774(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Acker et al. | Applicant |
| US6514226(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Levin et al. | Applicant |
| US6516211(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Acker et al. | Applicant |
| US6522926(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Kieval et al. | Applicant |
| US6522932(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Kuzma et al. | Applicant |
| US6524607(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Goldenheim et al. | Applicant |
| US6534081(B2) | 2003-03-01 | Goldenheim et al. | Applicant |
| US6536949(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Heuser | Applicant |
| US6564096(B2) | 2003-05-01 | Mest | Applicant |
| US6571127(B1) | 2003-05-01 | Ben-Haim et al. | Applicant |
| US6592567(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Levin et al. | Applicant |
| US6599256(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Acker et al. | Applicant |
| US6600954(B2) | 2003-07-01 | Cohen et al. | Applicant |
| US6600956(B2) | 2003-07-01 | Maschino et al. | Applicant |
| US6601459(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Jenni et al. | Applicant |
| US6605084(B2) | 2003-08-01 | Acker et al. | Applicant |
| US6615071(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Casscells, III et al. | Applicant |
| US6616624(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Kieval | Applicant |
| US6620151(B2) | 2003-09-01 | Blischak et al. | Applicant |
| US6622041(B2) | 2003-09-01 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US6635054(B2) | 2003-10-01 | Fjield et al. | Applicant |
| US6666845(B2) | 2003-12-01 | Hooper et al. | Applicant |
| US6669655(B1) | 2003-12-01 | Acker et al. | Applicant |
| US6671556(B2) | 2003-12-01 | Osorio et al. | Applicant |
| US6672312(B2) | 2004-01-01 | Acker | Applicant |
| US6676657(B2) | 2004-01-01 | Wood | Applicant |
| US6681136(B2) | 2004-01-01 | Schuler et al. | Applicant |
| US6684105(B2) | 2004-01-01 | Cohen et al. | Applicant |
| US6690971(B2) | 2004-02-01 | Schauerte et al. | Applicant |
| US6692738(B2) | 2004-02-01 | MacLaughlin et al. | Applicant |
| US6697670(B2) | 2004-02-01 | Chomenky et al. | Applicant |
| US6718208(B2) | 2004-04-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US6735471(B2) | 2004-05-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US6738663(B2) | 2004-05-01 | Schroeppel et al. | Applicant |
| US6749598(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Keren et al. | Applicant |
| US6786904(B2) | 2004-09-01 | Doscher et al. | Applicant |
| US6795728(B2) | 2004-09-01 | Chornenky et al. | Applicant |
| US6845267(B2) | 2005-01-01 | Harrison et al. | Applicant |
| US6850801(B2) | 2005-02-01 | Kieval et al. | Applicant |
| US6865416(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Dev et al. | Applicant |
| US6885888(B2) | 2005-04-01 | Rezai | Applicant |
| US6916656(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Walters et al. | Applicant |
| US6927049(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Rubinsky et al. | Applicant |
| US6939345(B2) | 2005-09-01 | KenKnight et al. | Applicant |
| US6958060(B2) | 2005-10-01 | Mathiesen et al. | Applicant |
| US6972013(B1) | 2005-12-01 | Zhang et al. | Applicant |
| US6978174(B2) | 2005-12-01 | Gelfand et al. | Applicant |
| US6985774(B2) | 2006-01-01 | Kieval et al. | Applicant |
| US6994700(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Elkins et al. | Applicant |
| US6994706(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Chornenky et al. | Applicant |
| US7054685(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Dimmer et al. | Applicant |
| US7063679(B2) | 2006-06-01 | Maguire et al. | Applicant |
| US7081114(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Rashidi | Applicant |
| US7081115(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Taimisto | Applicant |
| US7083614(B2) | 2006-08-01 | Fjield et al. | Applicant |
| US7122019(B1) | 2006-10-01 | Kesten et al. | Applicant |
| US7191015(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Lamson et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0044596(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Jaafar | Applicant |
| US2002/0026222(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Schauerte et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0026228(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Schauerte | Applicant |
| US2002/0032468(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0038137(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Stein | Applicant |
| US2002/0040204(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Dev et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0045853(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Dev et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0072782(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Osorio et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0107553(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0116030(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Rezai | Applicant |
| US2002/0120304(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Mest | Applicant |
| US2002/0165586(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0169413(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Keren et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0177846(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Mulier et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0183684(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Dev et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0188325(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0198512(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Seward | Applicant |
| US2003/0004549(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Hill et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0009145(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Struijker-Boudier et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0040774(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Terry et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0045909(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Gross et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0060848(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Kieval et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0060857(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Perrson et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0060858(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Kieval et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0100924(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Foreman et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0120270(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Acker | Applicant |
| US2003/0150464(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Casscells | Applicant |
| US2003/0181963(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Pellegrino et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0199747(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Michlitsch et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0199767(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Cespedes et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0199768(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Cespedes et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0199806(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Kieval | Applicant |
| US2003/0204161(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Ferek-Petric | Applicant |
| US2003/0216792(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Levin et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0220521(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Reitz et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0236443(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Cespedes et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0010303(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Bolea et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0019364(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Kieval et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0019371(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Jaafar et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0064090(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Keren et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0064091(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Keren et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0065615(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Hooper et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0073238(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Makower | Applicant |
| US2004/0082978(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Harrison et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0101523(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Reitz et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0106953(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Yomtov et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0111080(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Harper et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0163655(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Gelfand et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0167415(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Gelfand et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0176699(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Walker et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0176757(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Sinelnikov et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0193228(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Gerber | Applicant |
| US2004/0220511(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Scott et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0249416(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Yun et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0254616(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Rossing et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0010263(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Schauerte | Applicant |
| US2005/0021092(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Yun et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0038409(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Segal et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0049542(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Sigg et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0065562(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Rezai | Applicant |
| US2005/0065573(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Rezai | Applicant |
| US2005/0065574(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Rezai | Applicant |
| US2005/0075681(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Rezai et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0080459(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Jacobson et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0096710(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Kieval | Applicant |
| US2005/0153885(A1) | 2005-07-01 | Yun et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0154418(A1) | 2005-07-01 | Kieval et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0171523(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Rubinsky et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0171574(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Rubinsky et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0171575(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Dev et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0197624(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Goodson et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0209548(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Dev et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0209642(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Palti | Applicant |
| US2005/0228459(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Levin et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0228460(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Levin et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0234523(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Levin et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0240126(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Foley et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0240173(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Palti | Applicant |
| US2005/0240228(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Palti | Applicant |
| US2005/0240241(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Yun et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0245882(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Elkins et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0251212(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Kieval et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0261672(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Deem et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0267010(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Goodson et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0282284(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Rubinsky et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0288730(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Deem et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0004417(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Rossing et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0004430(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Rossing et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0025821(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Gelfand et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0030814(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Valencia et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0036218(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Goodson et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0041277(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Deem et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0041283(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Gelfand et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0067972(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Kesten et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0069323(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Elkins et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0074453(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Kieval et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0079859(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Elkins et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0085046(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Rezai et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0089674(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Walters et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0100667(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Machado et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0111754(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Rezai et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0116720(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Knoblich | Applicant |
| US2006/0121016(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US2006/0121610(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Rubinsky et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0135998(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Libbus et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0136004(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Cowan et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0149350(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Patel et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0155344(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Rezai et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0167437(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Valencia | Applicant |
| US2006/0167499(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Palti | Applicant |
| US2006/0189941(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Seward et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0189960(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Kesten et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0190044(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Libbus et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0206149(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Yun | Applicant |
| US2006/0229677(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Moffitt et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0282407(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Demarais et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0319513(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Pu et al. | Examiner |
| US2009/0024195(A1) | 2009-01-01 | Rezai et al. | Examiner |
| DE3151180(A1) | 1982-08-01 | Applicant | |
| EP811395(A2) | 1997-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-85/01213 | 1985-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-91/04725 | 1991-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-93/02740 | 1993-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-93/07803 | 1993-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-94/00188 | 1994-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-95/33514 | 1995-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-96/04957 | 1996-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-96/11723 | 1996-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-97/13550 | 1997-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-97/49453 | 1997-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-98/37926 | 1998-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-98/43700 | 1998-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-98/43701 | 1998-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-98/48888 | 1998-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-99/33407 | 1999-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-99/51286 | 1999-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-99/52424 | 1999-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-01/26729 | 2001-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-02/09808 | 2002-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-02/26314 | 2002-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-02/053207 | 2002-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-02/070039(A2) | 2002-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-02/070047 | 2002-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-02/085448 | 2002-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03/018108 | 2003-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03/028802 | 2003-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03/063692 | 2003-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03/071140(A2) | 2003-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03/076008 | 2003-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03/082080 | 2003-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-03/082403 | 2003-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/026370 | 2004-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/026371 | 2004-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/026374 | 2004-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/030718 | 2004-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/032791 | 2004-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2004/107965 | 2004-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2005014100 | 2005-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2005016165 | 2005-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2005/032646 | 2005-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2005/065284 | 2005-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2005/084389(A2) | 2005-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2005/097256(A2) | 2005-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2005/123183 | 2005-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2006/007048(A2) | 2006-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2006018528(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2006/031899(A2) | 2006-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2006/041847 | 2006-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2006/041881 | 2006-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-2007/078997 | 2007-07-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (323)
- “Isovue: Data Sheet”. Regional Health Limited. 8 pages. Mar. 11, 2003.Applicant
- Amersham Health. “Hypaque-Cysto” 6 pages. 2003.Applicant
- Arentz, Thomas et al. “Incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis 2 years after radiofrequency catheter ablation of refractory atrial fibrillation.” European Heart Journal. 2003. 24; pp. 963-969.Applicant
- Boehmer, John P. “Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic CHF: Indications, Devices and Outcomes”. Penn State College of Medicine: Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute. Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2005. 31 slides.Applicant
- Braunwald, E., Heart Disease, “A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine,” 5th Ed., vol. 2, 1997, pp. 480-481, 824-825, 1184-1288 and 1923-1925, W.B. Saunders Company.Applicant
- Bunch, Jared T. et al. “Mechanism of Phrenic Nerve Injury During Radiofrequency Ablation at the Pulmonary Vein Orifice.” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. vol. 16, No. 12. pp. 1318-1325. Dec. 2005.Applicant
- Burkhoff, Daniel. “Interventional Device-Based Therapy For CHF Will Redefine Current Treatment Paradigms”. Columbia University. 2004. 32 slides.Applicant
- Canbaz, Suat et al. “Electrophysiological evaluation of phrenic nerve injury during cardiac surgery—a prospective, controlled clinical study.” BioMed Central. 5 pages. 2004.Applicant
- Carson, Peter. “Device-based Treatment For Chronic Heart Failure: Electrical Modulation of Myocardial Contractility”. Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2005. 21 slides.Applicant
- Chiou, CW et al. “Efferent Vagal Innervation of the Canine Atria and Sinus and Atrioventricular Nodes”. Circulation. Jun. 1997. 95(11):2573-2584. Abstract only. 2 pages.Applicant
- Daniel, Alan and Honig, Carl R. “Does Histamine Influence Vasodilation Caused by Prolonged Arterial Occlusion or Heavy Exercise?” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. vol. 215 No. 2. Aug. 21, 1980. pp. 533-538.Applicant
- Dong, Jun et al. “Incidence and Predictors of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using the Anatomic Pulmonary Vein Ablation Approach: Results from Paired Magnetic Resonance Imaging.” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. vol. 16, No. 8, Aug. 2005. pp. 845-852.Applicant
- Fischell, Tim A. et al. “Ultrasonic Energy: Effects on Vascular Function and Integrity.” Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association. 1991. 84;pp. 1783-1795.Applicant
- Hodgkin, Douglas D. et al. “Electrophysiologic Characteristics of a Pulsed Iontophoretic Drug-Delivery System in Coronary Arteries.” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 29(1):pp. 39-44, Jan. 1997. Abstract. 2 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report, PCT/US04/38498, Mailed Feb. 18, 2005, Applicant: G & L Consulting, LLC (3 pages).Applicant
- Jia, Jianping and Pollock, Martin. “The pathogenesis of non-freezing cold nerve injury: Observations in the rat.” Brain. 120; pp. 631-646. 1997.Applicant
- Jia, Jianping et al. “Cold injury to nerves is not due to ischaemia alone.” Brain. 121;pp. 989-1001. 1998.Applicant
- Jin, Yuanzha. Et al. “Pulmonary Vein Stenosis and Remodeling After Electrical Isolation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Short- and Medium-Term Follow-Up.” PACE, vol. 27. pp. 1362-1370. Oct. 2004.Applicant
- Knot, Harm J. and Nelson, Mark T. “Regulation of arterial diameter and wall [Ca2+] in cerebral arteries of rat by membrane potential and intravascular pressure.” The Journal of Physiology. 1998. 508; pp. 199-209.Applicant
- Kok, Lai Chow et al. “Effect of Heating on Pulmonary Veins: How to Avoid Pulmonary Vein Stenosis.” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. vol. 14, No. 3, Mar. 2003. pp. 250-254.Applicant
- Kumagai, K. et al. “New Approach to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Multielectrode Basket Catheter”. Circulation Journal. vol. 70, No. 1. Jan. 2006. Abstract only. 2 pages.Applicant
- Lee, Michael A. (editor). SPORTSMed. Connecticut State Medical Society Committee on the Medical Aspects of Sports. Fall/Winter 2005. 10 pages.Applicant
- Mathur, Vandana S. “Intra-Renal Drug Delivery for Fluid Overload”. FlowMedica. Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2005. 31 slides.Applicant
- Mehran, Roxana. “Renal insufficiency and contrast nephropathy: The most common, least understood risk factor”. Cardiovascular Research Foundation. Columbia University Medical Center. 2005. 86 slides.Applicant
- Packer, Douglas L. et al. “Clinical Presentation, Investigation, and Management of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.” Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association. Feb. 8, 2005. pp. 546-554.Applicant
- Pappone, Carlo and Santinelli, Vincenzo. “[2005][P2-70] Safety Report of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation. A 9-Year Single-Center Experience on 6,442 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.” Abstract only. 1 page.Applicant
- Pappone, Carlo and Santinelli, Vincenzo. “Multielectrode basket catheter: A new tool for curing atrial fibrillation?” Heart Rhythm, vol. 3, Issue 4, pp. 385-386. Apr. 2006.Applicant
- Pappone, Carlo et al. “[2004][759] Pulmonary Vein Denervation Benefits Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Patients after Circumferential Ablation.” Abstract only. 1 page.Applicant
- Pope, Jill. “Fixing a Hole: Treating Injury by Repairing Cells.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Annals Extra. Jul. 6, 2006. 5 pages.Applicant
- Purerfellner, Helmut and Martinek, Martin. “Pulmonary vein stenosis following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.” Current Opinion In Cardiology. 20; pp. 484-490. 2005.Applicant
- Purerfellner, Helmut et al. “Pulmonary Vein Stenosis by Ostial Irrigated-Tip Ablation: Incidence, Time Course, and Prediction.” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. vol. 14, No. 2, Feb. 2003. pp. 158-164.Applicant
- Saad, Eduardo B. et al. “Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Functional Characterization, Evolution, and Influence of the Ablation Strategy.” Circulation. 108; pp. 3102-3107, 2003.Applicant
- Schauerte, P et al. “Catheter ablation of cardiac autonomic nerves for prevention of vagal atrial fibrillation.” Circulation. 102(22). Nov. 28, 2000. Abstract only. 2 pages.Applicant
- Schauerte, P et al. “Focal atrial fibrillation: experimental evidence for a pathophysiologic role of the autonomic nervous system.” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 12(5). May 2001. Abstract only. 2 pages.Applicant
- Schauerte, P et al. “Transvenous parasympathetic nerve stimulation in the inferior vena cava and atrioventricular conduction.” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 11(1). Jan. 2000. Abstract only. 2 pages.Applicant
- Scherlag, BJ and Po, S. “The intrinsic cardiac nervous system and atrial fibrillation.” Current Opinion in Cardiology. 21(1):51-54, Jan. 2006. Abstract only. 2 pages.Applicant
- Schmitt, Joseph et al. “Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography—Opening a Window into Coronary Artery Disease”. LightLab Imaging, Inc. Business Briefing: European Cardiology 2005.Applicant
- Siegel, RJ et al. “Clinical demonstration that catheter-delivered ultrasound energy reverses arterial vasoconstriction.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1992. 20; 732-735. Summary only. 2 pages.Applicant
- Sobotka, Paul A. “Treatment Strategies for Fluid Overload, CHF Patients”. CHF Solutions. Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2005. 20 slides.Applicant
- Steffen, W. et al. “Catheter-delivered high intensity, low frequency ultrasound induces vasodilation in vivo.” European Heart Journal. 1994. 15;pp. 369-376.Applicant
- Steg, PG et al. “Pulsed ultraviolet laser irradiation produces endothelium-independent relaxation of vascular smooth muscle”. Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association. 1989. pp. 189-197.Applicant
- Taka, Tomomi et al. “Impaired Flow-Mediated Vasodilation in vivo and Reduced Shear-Induced Platelet Reactivity in vitro in Response to Nitric Oxide in Prothrombotic, Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats”. Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis. Dec. 23, 2002. pp. 184-189.Applicant
- Tamborero, David et al. “Incidence of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis in Patients Submitted to Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Comparison of the Selective Segmental Ostial Ablation vs. the Circumferential Pulmonary Veins Ablation.” Journal of Intervocational Cardiac Electrophysiology. 14; pp. 41-25. 2005.Applicant
- Yu, Wen-Chung et al. “Acquired Pulmonary Vein Stenosis after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. vol. 12, No. 8. Aug. 2001. pp. 887-892.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/408,665, filed Apr. 8, 2003, Levin et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/900,199, filed Jul. 28, 2004, Gelfand.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/129,765, filed May 13, 2005, Deem.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/133,925, filed May 20, 2005, Gelfand.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/144,173, filed Jun. 3, 2005, Levin et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/144,298, filed Jun. 3, 2005, Levin et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,122, filed Jun. 3, 2005, Levin et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/189,563, filed Jul. 25, 2005, Deem.Applicant
- “2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension,” Journal of Hypertension 2003, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 1011-1053.Applicant
- “Advances in the role of the sympathetic nervous system in cardiovascular medicine,” 2001 SNS Report, No. 3, Springer, published with an educational grant from Servier, pp. 1-8.Applicant
- “Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Wounds,” Radiation Protection Standard, Maximum Exposure Levels to Radiofrequency Fields—3 KHz to 300 GHz, Radiation Protection Series No. 3, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Apr. 1996, 322 pages.Applicant
- “Electropermeabilization (Electroporation),” Cyto Pulse Sciences Inc., http://www.cytopulse.com/electroporation.html (last accessed Mar. 3, 2005), 3 pages.Applicant
- “Electroporation based Technologies and Treatments,” ESPE Newsletter No. 6, QLK 02002-2003, Jan. 2005, www.cliniporator.com, 4 pages.Applicant
- “End-stage renal disease payment policies in traditional Medicare,” Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy, Mar. 2001, Medpac, pp. 123-138.Applicant
- “Fact Book Fiscal Year 2003,” National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Feb. 2004, 197 pages.Applicant
- “Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2004 update,” American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, Dallas, Texas, © 2003 American Heart Association, 52 pages.Applicant
- “Hypertension Incidence and Prevalence, Age Specific Rates, By Gender, B.C., 2001/2002,” Graph., Chronic Disease Management, May 2003, British Columbia Ministry of Health Services, 1 page.Applicant
- Implantable Pump—The Medtronic MiniMed 2007 Implantable Insulin Pump System, Medtronic MiniMed 2004, 4 pages.Applicant
- “Market for infusion pumps grows with an aging population,” NWL 97-01, The BBI Newsletter, vol. 20, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1997, American Health Consultants Inc., 6 pages.Applicant
- “PHCL 762 Pharmacology of the Autonomic Nervous System,” Chapter 2 and 6.8 in Mosby, http://www.kumc.edu/research/medicine/pharmacology/CAI/phcl762.html, last accessed Aug. 24, 2004, 14 pages.Applicant
- “Programmable Infusion System,” Pumps and Pump Selection, Medtronic Pain Therapies, Medtronic, Inc. Sep. 5, 2001, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Pulmonary Concepts in Critical Care Breath Sounds,” http://mbob.tripod.com/breath.htm, last accessed Aug. 23, 2004, 5 pages.Applicant
- “Pulmonary Function Testing,” http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/˜daa/lecture/pft.htm, last accessed Aug. 23, 2004, 8 pages.Applicant
- “Sensorcaine-MPF Spinal Injection,” informational document, AstraZeneca 2001, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Summary,” Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 17, Issue 5, 1989, pp. 515-529.Applicant
- “The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial,” ALLHAT Research Group, JAMA 2002, vol. 288, pp. 2981-2997.Applicant
- Aars, H. and S. Akre, “Reflex Changes in Sympathetic Activity and Arterial Blood Pressure Evoked by Afferent Stimulation of the Renal Nerve,” Feb. 26, 1999, Acta Physiol. Scand., vol. 78, 1970, pp. 184-188.Applicant
- Abramov, G.S. et al., “Alteration in sensory nerve function following electrical shock,” Burns vol. 22, No. 8, © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd., pp. 602-606.Applicant
- Achar, Suraj, M.D. and Suriti Kundu, M.D., “Principles of Office Anesthesia: Part I. Infiltrative Anesthesia,” Office Procedures, American Family Physician, Jul. 1, 2002, vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 91-94.Applicant
- Agnew, William F. et al., “Evolution and Resolution of Stimulation-Induced Axonal Injury in Peripheral Nerve,” May 21, 1999, Muscle and Nerve, vol. 22, Oct. 1999, © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1393-1402.Applicant
- Ahadian, Farshad M., M.D., “Pulsed Radiofrequency Neurotomy: Advances in Pain Medicine,” Current Pain and Headache Reports 2004, vol. 8, © 2004 Current Science Inc., pp. 34-40.Applicant
- Alford, J.Winslow, M.D. and Paul. D. Fadale, M.D., “Evaluation of Postoperative Bupivacaine Infusion for Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery October, vol. 19, No. 8, © 2003 Arthroscopy Association of North America, pp. 855-861.Applicant
- Andrews, B.T. et al., “The use of surgical sympathectomy in the treatment of chronic renal pain,” Mar. 5, 1997, British Journal of Urology, vol. 80, © 1997 British Journal of Urology, pp. 6-10.Applicant
- Antman, Elliott M. and Eugene Braunwald, “Chapter 37—Acute Myocardial Infarction,” Heart Disease—A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 5th Edition, vol. 2, 1997, Edited by Eugene Braunwald, pp. 1184-1288.Applicant
- Archer, Steffan et al., “Cell Reactions to Dielectrophoretic Manipulation,” Mar. 1, 1999, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1999 Academic Press, pp. 687-698.Applicant
- Arias, Manuel J., M.D., “Percutaneous Radio Frequency Thermocoagulation with Low Temperature in the Treatment of Essential Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia,” Surg. Neurol. 1986, vol. 25, © 1986 Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc., pp. 94-96.Applicant
- Aronofsky, David H., D.D.S., “Reduction of dental postsurgical symptoms using nonthermal pulsed high-peak-power electromagnetic energy,” Oral Surg., Nov. 1971, vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 688-696.Applicant
- Aspelin, Peter, M.D., Ph.D. et al, “Nephrotoxic Effects in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Angiography,” Feb. 6, 2003, New England Journal of Medicine 2003, vol. 348, No. 6, 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society, pp. 491-499.Applicant
- Augustyniak, Robert A. et al., “Sympathetic Overactivity as a Cause of Hypertension in Chronic Renal Failure,” Aug. 14, 2001, Journal of Hypertension, 2002, vol. 20, 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 3-9.Applicant
- Awwad, Ziad M., FRCS and Bashir A. Atiyat, GBA, JBA, “Pain relief using continuous bupivacaine infusion in the paravertebral space after loin incision,” May 15, 2004, Saudi Med. J. 2004, vol. 25, No. 10, pp. 1369-1373.Applicant
- Badyal, D.K., H. Lata and A.P. Dadhich, “Animal Models of Hypertension and Effect of Drugs,” Aug. 19, 2003, Indian Journal of Pharmacology 2003, vol. 35, pp. 349-362.Applicant
- Baker, Carol E. et al., “Effect of pH Bupivacaine on Duration of Repeated Sciatic Nerve Blocks in the Albino Rat,” Anesth. Analg, 1991, vol. 72, © 1991 The International Anesthesia Research Society, pp. 773-778.Applicant
- Balazs, Tibor, “Development of Tissue Resistance to Toxic Effects of Chemicals,” Jan. 26, 1974, Toxicology, vol. 2, © 1974 Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 247-255.Applicant
- Barrett, Carolyn J. et al., “Long-term control of renal blood flow: what is the role of renal nerves?” Jan. 4, 2001, Am. J. Physiol. Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 2001, vol. 280, © 2001 the American Physiological Society, pp. R1534-R1545.Applicant
- Barrett, Carolyn J. et al., “What Sets The Long-Term Level of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity?,” May 12, 2003, Integrative Physiology, Circulation Research 2003, vol. 92, © 2003 American Heart Association, pp. 1330-1336.Applicant
- Bassett, C. Andrew L. et al., “Augmentation of Bone Reapair by Inductively Coupled Electromagnetic Fields,” May 3, 1974, Science, vol. 184, pp. 575-577.Applicant
- Bassett, C. Andrew L., “Fundamental and Practical Aspects of Therapeutic Uses of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs),” Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 17, No. 5, 1989, pp. 451-514.Applicant
- Beebe, Stephen J. et al., “Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) Effects on Cells and Tissues: Apoptosis Induction and Tumor Growth Inhibition,” Oct. 11, 2001, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 30, No. 1, Feb. 2002, © 2002 IEEE, pp. 286-292.Applicant
- Beebe, Stephen J. et al., “Nanosecond pulsed electric fields modulate cell function through intracellular signal transduction mechanisms,” Apr. 8, 2004, Physiological Measurement, vol. 25, 2004, © 2004 IOP Publishing Ltd., pp. 1077-1093.Applicant
- Berde, Charles and Gary R. Strichartz, “Local Anesthetics,” Anesthesia, Chapter 13, 5th addition, Churchill-Livingston, Philadelphia 2000, pp. 491-521.Applicant
- Bhadra, Niloy and Kevin L. Kilgore, “Direct Current Electrical Conduction Block of Peripheral Nerve,” Feb. 25, 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 12, No. 3, Sep. 2004, pp. 313-324.Applicant
- Bhatt, Deepak L. et al., “Rhabdomyolysis Due to Pulsed Electric Fields,” May 11, 1989, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Jul. 1990, pp. 1-11.Applicant
- Bigler, D. et al., “Tachyphylaxis during postoperative epidural analgesia-new insights,” Apr. 15, 1987, Letter to the Editor, Acta Anesthesiol. Scand. 1987, vol. 31, pp. 664-665.Applicant
- Binder, Allan et al., “Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy of Persistent Rotator Cuff Tendinitis,” The Lancet, Saturday Mar. 31, 1984, The Lancet Ltd., pp. 695-698.Applicant
- Black, Henry R., M.D., “Resistant Hypertension 2004,” presentation at Rush University Medical Center, Jul. 15, 2004, 40 pages.Applicant
- Blad, B., et al., “An Electrical Impedance index to Assess Electroporation in Tissue,” Tissue and Organ (Therapy) 2001, Oslo, pp. 31-34.Applicant
- Blair, M.L. et al., “Sympathetic activation cannot fully account for increased plasma renin levels during water deprivation,” Sep. 23, 1996, Am J Physiol 1997, vol. 272, © 1997 the American Physiological Society, pp. R1197-R1203.Applicant
- Blomberg, Sture G., M.D., Ph.D., “Long-Term Home Self-Treatment with High Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia in Patients with Severe Coronary Artery Disease,” Mar. 29, 1994, Anesth. Analg. 1994, vol. 79, © 1994 International Anesthesia Research Society, pp. 413-421.Applicant
- Cahana, A. et al., “Acute Differential Modulation of Synaptic Transmission and Cell Survival During Exposure to Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency Energy,” The Journal of Pain, May 2003, vol. 4, No. 4, © 2003 by the American Pain Society, pp. 197-202.Applicant
- Cahana, Alex, M.D., “Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Neurobiologic and Clinical Reality,” May 17, 2005, Anesthesiology 2005, vol. 103, No. 6, Dec. 2005, © 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., p. 1311.Applicant
- Calaresu, F.R. et al., “Haemodynamic Responses and Renin Release During Stimulation of Afferent Renal Nerves in the Cat,” Aug. 12, 1975, J. Physiol. 1976, vol. 255, pp. 687-700.Applicant
- Cameron, Tracy. “Micromodular Implants to Provide Electrical Stimulation of Paralyzed Muslces and Limbs.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 44, No. 9, Sep. 1997. pp. 781-790.Applicant
- Campese, V.M. et al., “Renal Afferent Denervation Prevents the Progression of Renal Disease in the Renal Ablation Model of Chronic Renal Failure in the Rat,” Jun. 13, 1995, American Journal of Kidney Diseases 1995, vol. 26, No. 5, 1995 the National Kidney Foundation, Inc., pp. 861-865.Applicant
- Campese, V.M., “A new model of neurogenic hypertension caused by renal injury: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications,” Clin. Exp. Nephrol 2003, vol. 7, © 2003 Japanese Society of Nephroloogy, pp. 167-171.Applicant
- Campese, V.M., “Neurogenic factors and hypertension in chronic renal failure,” Journal of Nephrology, vol. 10, No. 4, © 1997 Societa Italiana di Nefrologia, pp. 184-187.Applicant
- Carls, G., et al., “Electrical and magnetic stimulation of the intercostal nerves: a comparative study,” Electromyogr. clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 37, 1997, pp. 509-512.Applicant
- Carlson, Scott H. and J. Michael Wyss, “e-Hyertension, Opening New Vistas,” Introductory Commentary, Hypertension 2000, vol. 35, American Heart Association, Inc., 2000, p. 538.Applicant
- Chang, Donald C., “Cell poration and cell fusion using an oscillating electric field,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 56, Oct. 1989, Biophysical Society, pp. 641-652.Applicant
- Chobanian, Aram V. et al., “Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure,” Nov. 6, 2003, Hypertension 2003, vol. 42, © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 1206-1252.Applicant
- Conradi, E., Ines Helen Pages, “Effects of Continuous and Pulsed Microwave Irradiation on Distribution of Heat in the Gluteal Region of Minipigs,” Scand. J. Rehab. Med., vol. 21, 1989, pp. 59-62.Applicant
- Converse Jr., R.L. et al., “Sympathetic Overactivity in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure,” New England Journal of Medicine, Dec. 31, 1992, vol. 327 (27), pp. 1912-1918.Applicant
- Cosman, Eric R., Jr. et al., “Electric and Thermal Field Effects in Tissue Around Radiofrequency Electrodes,” Pain Medicine, vol. 6, No. 6, 2005, American Academy of Pain Medicine, pp. 405-424.Applicant
- Cosman, Eric R., Ph.D., “A Comment on the History of the Pulsed Radiofrequency Technique for Pain Therapy.” Anesthesiology Dec. 2005, vol. 103, No. 6, © 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., p. 1312.Applicant
- Crawford, William H. et al., “Pulsed Radio Frequency Therapy of Experimentally Induced Arthritis in Ponies,” Dec. 18, 1989, Can. J. Vet. Res. 1991, vol. 55, pp. 76-85.Applicant
- Dahm, Peter et al., “Efficacy and Technical Complications of Long-Term Continuous Intraspinal Infusions of Opioid and/or Bupivacaine in Refractory Nonmalignant Pain . . . ,” Oct. 6, 1997, The Clinical Journal of Pain 1998, vol. 14, No. 1, © 1998 Lippincott-Raven Publishers, pp. 4-16.Applicant
- Dahm, Peter O. et al., “Long-Term Intrathecal Infusion of Opioid and/or Bupivacaine in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain,” Neuromodulation 1998, vol. 1, No. 3, © 1998 International Neuromodulation Society, pp. 111-128.Applicant
- Dang, Nicholas C. et al., “A Novel Approach to Increase Total Urine Output in Heart Failure: Renal Nerve Blockade,” ACC 2005 poster, 1 page.Applicant
- Davalos, R. et al., “Electrical Impedance Tomography for Imaging Tissue Electroporation,” Jul. 25, 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, No. 5, May 2004, IEEE 2004, pp. 761-767.Applicant
- Davalos, R.V. et al., “Tissue Ablation with Irreversible Electroporation,” Sep. 7, 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 33, No. 2, © 2005 Biomedical Engineering Society, pp. 223-231.Applicant
- De Leeuw, Peter W. et al., “Renal Vascular Tachyphylaxis to Angiotensin II: Specificity of the Response for Angiotensin,” Dec. 28, 1981, Life Sciences, vol. 30, © 1982 Pergamon Press Ltd., pp. 813-819.Applicant
- Deng, Jingdong et al., “The Effects of Intense Submicrosecond Electrical Pulses on Cells,” Nov. 26, 2002, Biophysical Journal, vol. 84, Apr. 2003, © 2003 Biophysical Society, pp. 2709-2714.Applicant
- Denton, Kate M. et al., “Differential Neural Control of Glomerular Ultrafiltration,” Jan. 30, 2004, Proceedings of the Australian Physiological and Pharmacological Society Symposium: Hormonal, Metabolic and Neural Control of the Kidney, Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (2004), 31, pp. 380-386.Applicant
- Dev, Nagendu B., Ph.D. et al., “Intravascular Electroporation Markedly Attenuates Neointima Formation After Balloon Injury of the Carotid Artery in the Rat,” Journal of Interventional Cardiology, vol. 13, No. 5, 2000, pp. 331-338.Applicant
- Dev, Nagendu B., Ph.D. et al., “Sustained Local Delivery of Heparin to the Rabbit Arterial Wall With an Electroporation Catheter,” May 5, 1998, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 1998, vol. 45, © 1998 Wiley-Liss Inc., pp. 337-345.Applicant
- DiBona, G., “Neural Control of the Kidney: Functionally Specific Renal Sympathetic Nerve Fibers,” Starling Lecture, Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 2000, 279, 2000 The American Physiological Society, pp. R1517-R1524.Applicant
- DiBona, Gerald F., “Sympathetic Nervous System and the Kidney in Hypertension,” Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 2002, vol. 11, 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 197-200.Applicant
- DiBona, Gerald F. and Linda L. Sawin, “Role of renal nerves in sodium retention of cirrhosis and congestive heart failure,” Sep. 27, 1990, Am J Physiol 1991, vol. 260, © 1991 the American Physiological Society, pp. R298-R305.Applicant
- DiBona, Gerald F. and Ulla C. Kopp, “Neural Control of Renal Function,” Physiological Reviews Jan. 1997, vol. 77, No. 1, © 1997 American Physiological Society, pp. 75-197.Applicant
- DiBona, Gerald F., “Functionally Specific Renal Sympathetic Nerve Fibers: Role in Cardiovascular Regulation,” Mar. 6, 2001, American Journal of Hypertension 2001, vol. 14, 2001 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. Published by Elsevier Science Inc., pp. 163S-170S.Applicant
- DiBona, Gerald F., “Nervous Kidney—Interaction Between Renal Sympathetic Nerves and the Renin-Angiotensin System in the Control of Renal Function,” Jun. 21, 2000, Hypertension 2000, vol. 36, 2000 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 1083-1088.Applicant
- DiBona, Gerald F., “Neural Control of the Kidney-Past, Present, and Future,” Nov. 4, 2002, Novartis Lecture, Hypertension 2003, vol. 41, part 2, © 2002 American Heart Association, pp. 621-624,Applicant
- DiBona, Gerald F., “Renal Innervation and Denervation: Lessons from Renal Transplantation Reconsidered,” Artificial Organs, vol. 11, No. 6, Raven Press Ltd., © 1987 International Society for Artificial Organs, pp. 457-462.Applicant
- DiBona, Gerald F., “The Sympathetic Nervous System and Hypertension,” Dec. 4, 2003, Hypertension Highlights, Hypertension Feb. 2004, vol. 43, © 2004 American Heart Association, pp. 147-150.Applicant
- DiBona, Gerald F., L.L. Sawin, “Effect of renal denervation on dynamic autoregulation of renal blood flow,” Feb. 12, 2004, Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 286, pp. F1209-F1218.Applicant
- DiBona, Gerald F., Susan Y. Jones, “Dynamic Analysis of Renal Nerve Activity Responses to Baroreceptor Denervation in Hypertensive Rats,” Sep. 19, 2000, Hypertension Apr. 2001, © 2001 American Heart Association, pp. 1153-1163.Applicant
- Dorros, Gerald, M.D., “Renal Artery Stenting State of the Art,” presentation, TCT, Washington D.C., Sep. 2003, 27 pages.Applicant
- Dueck, Ron, M.D., “Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring,” The Cardiopulmonary and Critical Care Journal, Chest, vol. 120, sec. 2, Aug. 2001, American College of Chest Physicians 2005, pp. 339-341, 5 pages.Applicant
- Dunn, Matthew D. et al., “Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease and Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease,” Oct. 25, 1999, American Journal of Kidney Diseases Apr. 2000, vol. 35, No. 4, © 2000 National Kidney Foundation, Inc., pp. 720-725.Applicant
- Durand, D.M., “Electrical Field Effects in Hyperexcitable Neural Tissue: A Review,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 106, No. 4, 2003, Nuclear Technology Publishing, pp. 325-331.Applicant
- Erdine, Serap and Alev Arat-Ozkan, “Resistant Hypertension,” European Society of Hypertension Scientific Newsletter: Update on Hypertension Management, 2003, vol. 4, No. 15, 2 pages.Applicant
- Fareed, Jawad, Ph.D. et al., “Some Objective Considerations for the Use of Heparins and Recombinant Hirudin in Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis 1991, vol. 17, No. 4, © 1991 Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., pp. 455-470.Applicant
- Ferguson, D.R. et al., “Responses of the pig isolated renal artery to transmural electrical stimulation and drugs,” Dec. 7, 1984, Br. J. Pharmac. 1985, vol. 84, © 1985 The Macmillan Press Ltd., pp. 879-882.Applicant
- Fernandez-Ortiz, Antonio et al., “A New Approach for Local Intravascular Drug Delivery—Iontophoretic Balloon,,” Intravascular Iontophoretic Local Delivery, Circulation, vol. 89, No. 4, Apr. 1994, pp. 1518-1522.Applicant
- Fields, Larry E. et al, “The Burden of Adult Hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000—A Rising Tide,” May 18, 2004, © 2004 the American Heart Association, Hypertension Oct. 2004, pp. 1-7.Applicant
- Freeman, Scott A. et al., “Theory of Electroporation of Planar Bilayer Membranes: Predictions of the Aqueous Area, Change in Capacitance, and Pore-Pore Separation,” Feb. 23, 1994, Biophysical Journal, Jul. 1994, vol. 67, © 1994 by the Biophysical Society, pp. 42-56.Applicant
- Fukuoka, Yuko et al., “Imaging of neural conduction block by neuromagnetic recording,” Oct. 16, 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology 2002, vol. 113, © Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd., pp. 1985-1992.Applicant
- Gami, Apoor S., M.D. and Vesna D. Garovic, M.D., “Contrast Nephropathy After Coronary Angiography,” Mayo Clin Proc. 2004, vol. 79, 2004 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, pp. 211-219.Applicant
- Gaylor, D.C. et al., “Significance of Cell Size and Tissue Structure in Electrical Trauma,” Jan. 26, 1998, J. Theor. Biol. 1988, vol. 133, © 1988 Academic Press Limited, pp. 223-237.Applicant
- Gehl, Julie et al., “In vivo electroporation of skeletal muscle: threshold, efficacy and relation to electric field distribution,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1428, 1999, Elsevier Science B.V. 1999, pp. 233-240.Applicant
- Ghoname, El-sayed A. et al., “Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: an alternative to TENS in the management of sciatica,” Apr. 26, 1999, Pain 1999, vol. 83, © 1999 International Association for the Study of Pain / Published by Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 193-199.Applicant
- Gimple, M.D., Lawrence et al., “Effect of Chronic Subcutaneous or Intramural Administration of Heparin on Femoral Artery Restenosis After Angioplasty in Hypercholesterolemic Rabbits” Laboratory Investigation, Circulation, vol. 86, No. 5, Nov. 1992, pp. 1536-1546.Applicant
- Goldberger, Jeffrey J. et al., “New technique for vagal nerve stimulation,” Jun. 2, 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods 91, © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 109-114.Applicant
- Gorbunov, F.E. et al., “The Use of Pulsed and Continuous Short Wave Diathermy (Electric Field) in Medical Rehabilitation of the Patients with Guillain-Barre Syndrome and Other Peripheral Myelinopathies,” May 6, 1994, 5 pages (most of article in Russian language).Applicant
- Greenwell, T.J. et al., “The outcome of renal denervation for managing loin pain haematuria syndrome,” Oct. 30, 2003, Institute of Urology and Nephrology, London, UK, © 2004 BJU International, 4 pages.Applicant
- Gruberg, Luis, M.D. et al., “The Prognostic Implications of Further Renal Function Deterioration Within 48 h of Interventional Coronary Procedures in Patients with Pre-existent Chronic Renal Insufficiency,” Jun. 19, 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2000, vol. 36, No. 5, © 2000 by the American College of Cardiology, pp. 1542-1548.Applicant
- Hajjar, Ihab, M.D., M.S. and Theodore A. Kotchen, M.D., “Trends in Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000,” JAMA, Jul. 9, 2003, vol. 290, No. 2, pp. 199-206.Applicant
- Hammer, Leah W. “Differential Inhibition of Functional Dilation of Small Arterioles by Indomethacin and Glibenclamide.” Hypertension. Feb. 2001 Part II. pp. 599-603.Applicant
- Hamza, M.D., Mohamed A. et al., “Effect of the Duration of Electrical Stimulation on the Analgesic Response in Patients with Low Back Pain,” Anesthesiology, vol. 91, No. 6, Dec. 1999, © 1999 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc., pp. 1622-1627.Applicant
- Han, Hyo-Kyung and Gordon L. Amidon, “Targeted Prodrug Design to Optimize Drug Delivery,” Mar. 21, 2000, AAPS Pharmsci. 2000, vol. 2, No. 1, article 6, pp. 1-11.Applicant
- Heida, Tjitske et al., “Investigating Membrane Breakdown of Neuronal Cells Exposed to Nonuniform Electric Fields by Finite-Element Modeling and Experiments,” May. 9, 2002. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 10, Oct. 2002, © 2002 IEEE, pp. 1195-1203.Applicant
- Higuchi, Yoshinori, M.D., Ph.D. et al., “Exposure of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in Rats to Pulsed Radiofrequency Currents Activates Dorsal Horn Lamina I and II Neurons,” Dec. 4, 2001, Experimental Studies, Neurosurgery, vol. 50, No. 4, Apr. 2002, pp. 850-856.Applicant
- Hildebrand, Keith R., D.V.M., Ph.D. et al., “Stability, Compatibility, and Safety of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Administered Chronically via an Implantable Delivery System,” May 18, 2001, The Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 17, No. 3, © 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., pp. 239-244.Applicant
- Hing, Esther, M.P.H. and Kimberly Middleton, B.S.N., M.P.H., “National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 Outpatient Department Summary,” Aug. 5, 2003, Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics, No. 338, CDC, 32 pages.Applicant
- Hopp, Francis A. and Jeanne L. Seagard, “Respiratory Responses to Selective Blockade of Carotid Sinus Baroreceptors in the Dog,” Jun. 22, 2005, Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1998, vol. 275, 2005 American Physiological Society, pp. R10-R18.Applicant
- Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. “Randomized Trial of High-Dose Chemotherapy and Blood Cell Autografts for High-Risk Primary Breast Carcinoma” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 92, No. 3, Feb. 2, 2000 pp. 225-233.Applicant
- Horwich, Tamara M.D., “New Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure,” the Heart.org Satellite program, Rapid Review, CME Symposium presented on Nov. 8, 2004 at the Sheraton New Orleans Hotel, 4 pages.Applicant
- Huang, Wann-Chu et al. “Renal Denervation Prevents and Reverses Hyperinsulinemia-Induced Hypertension in Rats,” Mar. 25, 1998, Hypertension 1998, vol. 32, 1998 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 249-254.Applicant
- Huang, Yifei et al., “Remodeling of the chronic severely failing ischemic sheep heart after coronary microembolization: functional, energetic, structural, and cellular responses,” Jan. 8, 2004, Am J Physiol. 2004, vol. 286, © 2004 the American Physiological Society, pp. H2141-H2150.Applicant
- Hughes, Gordon B., M.D. et al., “A Comparative Study of Neuropathologic Changes Following Pulsed and Direct Current Stimulation of the Mouse Sciatic Nerve,” Jun. 27, 1980, American Journal of Otolaryngology, Nov. 1980, vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 378-384.Applicant
- Israili, Z.H., “Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT) receptor blockers in hypertension,” Journal of Human Hypertension 2000, Macmillan Publishers Ltd., vol. 14, pp. S73-S86.Applicant
- Janssen, Ben J.A. et al., “Effects of complete renal denervation and selective afferent renal denervation on the hypertension induced by intrarenal norepinephrine infusion on conscious rats,” Jan. 4, 1989, Journal of Hypertension 1989, vol. 7, No. 6, © 1989 Current Science Ltd., pp. 447-455.Applicant
- Johansson, Bjorn, “Electrical Membrane Breakdown, A Possible Mediator of the Actions of Electroconvulsive Therapy,” Medical Hypotheses 1987, vol. 24, © 1987 Longman Group UK Ltd., pp. 313-324.Applicant
- Jorgensen, William A. et al., “Electrochemical Therapy of Pelvic Pain: Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) on Tissue Trauma,” Eur. J. Surg. 1994, vol. 160, Suppl. 574, © 1994 Scandinavian University Press, pp. 83-86.Applicant
- Joshi, R.P. et al., “Improved energy model for membrane electroporation in biological cells subjected to electrical pulses,” Apr. 9, 2002, Physical Review E, vol. 65, 041920-1, © 2002 The American Phsyical Society, 8 pages.Applicant
- Joshi, R.P. et al., “Self-consistent simulations of elctroporation dynamics in biological cells subjected to ultrashort electrical pulses,” Jun. 21, 2001, Physical Review E, vol. 64, 011913, © 2001The American Physical Society, pp. 1-10.Applicant
- Joshi, R.P., K.H. Schoenbach, “Mechanism for membrane electroporation irreversiblity under high-intensity, ultrashort electrical pulse conditions,” Nov. 11, 2002, Physical Review 2002, E 66, © 2002 The American Physical Society, pp. 052901-1-052901-4.Applicant
- Kanduser, Masa et al., “Effect of surfactant polyoxyethylene glycol (C12E8) on electroporation of cell line DC3F,” Aug. 20, 2002, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochem. Eng. Aspects 2003, vol. 214, © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 205-217.Applicant
- Katholi, Richard E., “Renal nerves in the pathogenesis of hypertension in experimental animals and humans,” Am J Physiol., vol. 245, © 1983 the American Physiological Society, pp. F1-F14.Applicant
- Kelleher, Catherine L. et al., “Characteristics of Hypertension in Young Adults With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Compared With the General U.S. Population,” Jun. 9, 2004, American Journal of Hypertension 2004, pp. 1029-1034.Applicant
- King, Ronald W.P., “Nerves in a Human Body Exposed to Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields,” Jun. 7, 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Dec. 1999, vol. 46, No. 12, © 1999 IEEE, pp. 1426-1431.Applicant
- Kinney, Brian M., M.D., “High-Tech Healing—The evolution of therapeutic electromagnetic fields in plastic surgery,” Plastic Surgery Products, Jun. 2004, pp. 32-36, 3 pages.Applicant
- Kok, R.J. et al., “Specific Delivery of Captopril to the Kidney with the Prodrug Captopril-Lysozyme,” Aug. 16, 1998, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 288, No. 1, © 1999 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, pp. 281-285.Applicant
- Kon, Valentina, “Neural Control of Renal Circulation,” Miner Electrolyte Metab 1989, vol. 15, © 1989 S. Karger AG, pp. 33-43.Applicant
- Koyama, Shozo et al., “Relative Contribution of Renal Nerve and Adrenal Gland to Renal Vascular Tone During Prolonged Canine Hemorrhagic Hypotension,” Sep. 24, 1992, Circulatory Shock 1993, vol. 39, © 1993 Wiley-Liss Inc., pp. 269-274.Applicant
- Kozak, Lola Jean, Ph.D. et al., “National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2001 Annual Summary with Detailed Diagnosis and Procedure Data,” Vital Health Statistics, Series 13, No. 156, Jun. 2004, CDC, 206 pages.Applicant
- Lafayette, Richard A., M.D., “How Does Knocking Out Angiotensin II Activity Reduce Renal Injury in Mice?” Jun. 14, 1999, Journal Club, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 35, No. 1, Jan. 2000, © 2000 National Kidney Foundation Inc., pp. 166-172.Applicant
- Lavie, Peretz, Ph.D. and Victor Hoffstein, M.D., “Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Possible Contributing Factor to Resistant Hypertension,” Jun. 2001, Sleep 2001, vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 721-725.Applicant
- Lee, Raphael C. and Jurgen Hannig, “Membrane Biology and Biophysics,” Chapter 25, Surgical Research, © 2001 Academic Press, pp. 297-305.Applicant
- Lee, Raphael C. et al., “Biophysical Injury Mechanisms in Electrical Shock Trauma,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2000, vol. 02, Copyright © 2000 by Annual Reviews, pp. 477-509.Applicant
- Lee, Raphael C., M.D., Sc.D. and Michael S. Kolodney, S.B., “Electrical Injury Mechanisms: Electrical Breakdown of Cell Membranes,” Oct. 1, 1986, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Nov. 1987, vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 672-679.Applicant
- Ligtenberg, Gerry, M.D. et al., “Reduction of Sympathetic Hyperactivity by Enalapril in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure,” Apr. 29, 1999, New England Journal of Medicine 1999, vol. 340, No. 17, © 1999 Massachusetts Medical Society, pp. 1321-1328.Applicant
- Lin, Vernon W. H. et al, “High intensity magnetic stimulation over the lumbosacral spine evokes antinociception in rats,” Apr. 16, 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 113, © 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd., pp. 1006-1012.Applicant
- Lipfert, Peter, M.D. et al., “Tachyphylaxis to Local Anesthetics Does Not Result From Reduced Drug Effectiveness at the Nerve Itself,” Aug. 3, 1988, Anesthesiology 1989, vol. 70, pp. 71-75.Applicant
- Lohmeier Thomas E. et al, “Baroreflexes prevent neurally induced sodium retention in angiotensin hypertension,” Am. J. Physiol. Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol., vol. 279, © 2000 the American Physiological Society, pp. R1437-R1448.Applicant
- Lohmeier, Thomas E. and Drew A. Hildebrandt, “Renal Nerves Promote Sodium Excretion in Angiotensin-Induced Hypertension,” Oct. 20, 1997, Hypertension 1998, vol. 31, Part 2, © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 429-434.Applicant
- Lohmeier, Thomas E. et al., “Prolonged Activation of the Baroflex Produces Sustained Hypotension,” Harry Goldblatt Award, Nov. 26, 2003, Hypertension 2004, vol. 43, part 2, © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 306-311.Applicant
- Lohmeier, Thomas E. et al., “Renal Nerves Promote Sodium Excretion During Long-Term Increases in Salt Intake,” Oct. 23, 1998, Hypertension 1999, vol. 33, part 2, © 1999 American Heart Association, pp. 487-492.Applicant
- Lohmeier, Thomas E. et al., “Sustained influence of the renal nerves to attenuate sodium retention in angiotensin hypertension,” Apr. 13, 2001, Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol., vol. 281, © 2001 the American Physiological Society, pp. R434-R443.Applicant
- Lohmeier, Thomas E., “Interactions Between Angiotensin II and Baroreflexes in Long-Term Regulation of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity,” Circulation Research, Jun. 27, 2003, © 2003 American Heart Association Inc., pp. 1282-1284.Applicant
- Luff, S.E. et al., “Two types of sympathetic axon innervating the juxtaglomerular arterioles of the rabbit and rat kidney differ structurally from those supplying other arteries,” May 1, 1991, Journal of Neurocytology 1991, vol. 20, © 1991 Chapman and Hall Ltd., pp. 781-795.Applicant
- Lundborg, C. et al., “Clinical experience using intrathecal (IT) bupivacaine infusion in three patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I),” Acta Aneaesthesiol. Scand. 1999, vol. 43, pp. 667-678.Applicant
- Maeder, Micha, M.D. et al., “Contrast Nephropathy: Review Focusing on Prevention,” Jun. 22, 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology Nov. 2, 2004, vol. 44, No. 9, © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, pp. 1763-1771.Applicant
- Malpas, Simon C., “What sets the long-term level of sympathetic nerve activity: is there a role for arterial baroreceptors?” Invited Review, Am J Physiol Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2004, vol. 286, © 2004 the American Physiological Society, pp. R1-R12.Applicant
- Marenzi, Giancarlo, M.D. et al., “The Prevention of Radiocontrast-Agent-Induced Nephropathy by Hemofiltration,” New England Journal of Medicine, Oct. 2, 2003, vol. 349 (14), © 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society, pp. 1333-1340.Applicant
- Martin, Jason B. et al., “Gene Transfer to Intact Mesenteric Arteries by Electroporation,” Mar. 27, 2000, Journal of Vascular Research 2000, vol. 37, 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel, pp. 372-380.Applicant
- McCreery, Douglas B. et al., “Charge Density and Charge Per Phase as Cofactors in Neural Injury Induced by Electrical Stimulation,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 17, No. 10, Oct. 1990, pp. 996-1000.Applicant
- McCullough, Peter A., M.D., MPH et al., “Acute Renal Failure after Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Risk Factors and Relationship to Mortality,” Apr. 14, 1997, AM J Med. 1997, vol. 103, 1997 Excerpta Medica, Inc., pp. 368-375.Applicant
- McMurray. John J.V., M.D. and Eileen O'Meara, M.D., “Treatment of Heart Failure with Spironolactone-Trial and Tribulations,” Aug. 5, 2004, New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, No. 6, © 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society, pp. 526-528.Applicant
- McRobbie, D. and M.A. Foster, “Thresholds for biological effects of time-varying magnetic fields,” Dec. 16, 1983, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 1984, vol. 5, No. 2, © 1984, The Institute of Physics, pp. 67-78.Applicant
- Medtronic Neurostimulation Systems, “Expanding the Array of Pain Control Solutions,” informational pamphlet, 1999 Medtronic, Inc., 6 pages.Applicant
- Medtronic, “Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Patient Management Guidelines for Clinicians, Medtronic, Inc. 1999, 115 pages.Applicant
- Medtronic, “SynchroMed Infusion System—Clinical Reference Guide for Pain Therapy,” Medtronic, Inc. 1998, 198 pages.Applicant
- Mess, Sarah A., M.D. et al., “Implantable Baclofen Pump as an Adjuvent in Treatment of Pressure Sores,” Mar. 1, 2003, Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 51, No. 5, Nov. 2003, © 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 465-467.Applicant
- Mihran, Richard T. et al., “Temporally-Specific Modification of Myelinated Axon Excitability in Vitro Following A Single Ultrasound Pulse,” Sep. 25, 1989, Ultrasound in Med.& Biol. 1990, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 297-309.Applicant
- Miklavcic, D. et al, “A Validated Model of in Vivo Electric Field Distribution in Tissues for Electrochemotherapy and for DNA Electrotransfer for Gene Therapy,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1523, 2000, pp. 73-83, www.elsevier.com/locate.bba.Applicant
- Mitchell, G.A.G., “The Nerve Supply of the Kidneys,” Aug. 20, 1949, Acta Anatomica, vol. 10, Fasc. 1/2, 1950, pp. 1-37.Applicant
- Moss, Nicholas G., “Renal function and renal afferent and efferent nerve activity,” Am J Physiol 1982, vol. 243, © 1982, the American Physiological Society, pp. F425-F433.Applicant
- Munglani, Rajesh, “The longer term effect of pulsed radiofrequency for neuropathic pain,” Jun. 8, 1998, Pain, vol. 80, © 1999 International Association for the Study of Pain, Published by Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 437-439.Applicant
- Naropin (ropivacaine HCI) injection, Rx only description, AstraZeneca 2001, 3 pages.Applicant
- National High Blood Pressure Education Program, “1995 Update of the Working Group Reports on Chronic Renal Failure and Renovascular Hypertension,” presentation, 13 pages.Applicant
- National Kidney Foundation, “Are You At Increased Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease?” © 2002 National Kidney Foundation, Inc., 14 pages.Applicant
- Nelson, Lawrence D. and Jeffrey L. Osborn, “Neurogenic Control of Renal Function in Response to Graded Nonhypotensive Hemorrahage in Conscious Dogs,” Sep. 13, 1992, Am. J. Physiol. 264, 1993, American Physiological Society 1993, pp. R661-R667.Applicant
- Nikolsky, Eugenia, M.D. et al., “Radiocontrast Nephropathy: Identifying the High-Risk Patient and the Implications of Exacerbating Renal Function,” Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2003, vol. 4, Supp. 1, © 2003 MedReviews, LLC, pp. S7-S14.Applicant
- Nozawa, Takashi et al., “Effects of Long Term Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Heart Failure After Myocardial Infarction in Rats,” Sep. 22, 2001, Heart Vessels 2002, vol. 16, Springer-Verlag 2002, pp. 51-56.Applicant
- Palmer, Biff F., M.D., “Managing Hyperkalemia Caused by Inhibitors of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System,” Aug. 5, 2004, The New England Journal of Medicine 2004, vol. 351, No. 6, © 2004 Massacusetts Medical Society, pp. 585-592.Applicant
- Peacock, J.M. and R. Orchardson, “Action potential conduction block of nerves in vitro by potassium citrate, potassium tartrate and potassium oxalate,” May 6, 1998, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, © 1999 Munksgaard, vol. 26, pp. 33-37.Applicant
- Pettersson, A. et al., “Renal interaction between sympathetic activity and ANP in rats with chronic ischaemic heart failure,” Nov. 25, 1998, Acta Physiol. Scand. 1989, vol. 135, pp. 487-492.Applicant
- Pliquett, U., “Joule heating during solid tissue electroporation,” Oct. 22, 2002, Medical & Biological Engineering and Computing 2003, vol. 41, pp. 215-219.Applicant
- Podhajsky, R. J., et al. “The Histologic Effects of Pulsed and Continuous Radiofrequency Lesions at 42° C. to Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion and Sciatic Nerve,” Spine, vol. 30, No. 9, 2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Inc., pp. 1008-1013.Applicant
- Popovic, Jennifer .R. and Margaret J. Hall, “1999 National Hospital Discharge Survey,” Advance Data, No. 319, CDC, pp. 1-17 & 20.Applicant
- Practice Guidelines Writing Committee and ESH/ESC Hypertension Guidelines Committee, “Practice Guidelines For Primary Care Physicians: 2003 ESH/ESC Hypertension Guidelines,” Published in Journal of Hypertension 2003, vol. 21, No. 10: 1011-1053, © 2003 European Society of Hypertension, pp. 1779-1786.Applicant
- Pucihar, Gorazd et al., “The influence of medium conductivity on electropermeabilization and survival of cells in vitro,” May 31, 2001, Bioelectrochemistry, vol. 54, 2001, Elsevier Science B.V. 2001, pp. 107-115.Applicant
- Raji, A. R. M. and R. E. M. Bowden, “Effects of High-Peak Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on the Degeneration and Regeneration of the Common Peroneal Nerve in Rats,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Aug. 1983, vol. 65-B, No. 4, © 1983 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery, pp. 478-492.Applicant
- Ram, C. Venkata S., M.D., “Understanding refractory hypertension,” May 15, 2004, Patient Care May 2004, vol. 38, pp. 12-16, 7 pages from http://www.patientcareonline.com/patcare/content/printContentPopup.jsp?id=108324.Applicant
- Ribstein, Jean and Michael H. Humphreys, “Renal nerves and cation excretion after acute reduction in functioning renal mass in the rat,” Sep. 22, 1983, Am J Physiol, vol. 246, © 1984 the American Physiological Society, pp. F260-F265.Applicant
- Richebe, Philippe, M.D. et al., “Immediate Early Genes after Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment: Neurobiology in Need of Clinical Trials,” Oct. 13, 2004, Anesthesiology Jan. 2005, vol. 102, No. 1, © 2004 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., pp. 1-3.Applicant
- Rihal, Charanjit S. et al., “Incidence and Prognostic Importance of Acute Renal Failure After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,” Mar. 6, 2002, Circulation May 14, 2002, vol. 10, © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 2259-2264.Applicant
- Rosen, S.M. et al., “Relationship of Vascular Reactivity to Plasma Renin Concentration in Patients with Terminal Renal Failure,” Proc. Dialysis Transplant Forum 1974, pp. 45-47.Applicant
- Roth, Bradley J. and Peter J. Basser, “A Model of the Stimulation of a Nerve Fiber by Electromagnetic Induction,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 37, No. 6, Jun. 1990, pp. 588-597.Applicant
- Rudin, Asa, M.D. et al., “Postoperative Epidural or Intravenous Analgesia after Major Abdominal or Thoraco-Abdominal Surgery,” The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc., Anesthesiology 2001, vol. 95, A-970, 1 page.Applicant
- Rudnick, Michael R. et al., “Contrast-induced nephropathy: How it develops, how to prevent it,” Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Jan. 2006, vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 75-87.Applicant
- Rump, L.C., “The Role of Sympathetic Nervous Activity in Chronic Renal Failure,” J Clinical Basic Cardiology 2001, vol. 4, pp. 179-182.Applicant
- Ruohonen, Jarmo et al., “Modeling Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Using Magnetic Fields,” Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System 1997, vol. 2, No. 1, © 1997 Woodland Publications, pp. 17-29.Applicant
- Scheiner, Avram, Ph.D., “The design, development and implementation of electrodes used for functional electrical stimulation,” Thesis paper, Case Western Reserve University, May 1992, 220 pages.Applicant
- Schoenbach, Karl H. et al., “Intracellular Effect of Ultrashort Electrical Pulses,” Dec. 26, 2000, Bioelectromagnetics 2001, vol. 22, © 2001 Wiley-Liss Inc., pp. 440-448.Applicant
- Schrier, Robert et al., “Cardiac and Renal Effects of Standard Versus Rigorous Blood Pressure Control in Autosomal-Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease,” Mar. 23, 2002, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, © 2002 American Society of Nephrology, pp. 1733-1739.Applicant
- Shupak, Naomi M., “Therapeutic Uses of Pulsed Magnetic-Field Exposure: A Review,” Radio Science Bulletin Dec. 2003, No. 307, pp. 9-32.Applicant
- Simpson, B. et al, “Implantable Spinal Infusion Devices for Chronic Pain and Spasticity: An Accelerated Systematic Review,” ASERNIP-S Report No. 42, May 2003, 56 pages.Applicant
- Sisken, B.F. et al., “229.17 Influence of Non-Thermal Pulsed Radiofrequency Fields (PRF) on Neurite Outgrowth,” Society for Neuroscience, vol. 21, 1995, 2 pages.Applicant
- Skeie, B. et al., “Effect of chronic bupivacaine infusion on seizure threshold to bupivacaine,” Dec. 28, 1986, Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 1987, vol. 31, pp. 423-425.Applicant
- Skopec, M., “A Primer on Medical Device Interactions with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems,” Feb. 4, 1997, CDRH Magnetic Resonance Working Group, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Updated May 23, 1997, 17 pages, http://www.fde.gov/cdrh/ode/primerf6.html, (last accessed Jan. 23, 2006.Applicant
- Slappendel, Robert et al., “The efficacy of radiofrequency lesioning of the cervical spinal dorsal root ganglion in a double blinded randomized study,” Jun. 26, 1997, Pain, vol. 73, © 1997 International Association of the Study of Pain, Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 159-163.Applicant
- Sluijter, M.D., Ph.D., “Pulsed Radiofrequency,” May 17, 2005, Anesthesiology Dec. 2005, vol. 103, No. 6, © 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., pp. 1313-1314.Applicant
- Sluijter, M.D., Ph.D., “Radiofrequency Part 1: The Lumbosacral Region,” Chapter 1 Mechanisms of Chronic Pain and part of Chapter 2 Spinal Pain, © 2001 FlivoPress SA, Meggen (LU), Switzerland, pp. 1-26.Applicant
- Sluijter, M.D., Ph.D., “The Role of Radiofrequency in Failed Back Surgery Patients,” Current Review of Pain 2000, vol. 4, © 2000 by Current Science Inc., pp. 49-53.Applicant
- Souza, D.R.B. et al., “Chronic experimental myocardial infarction produces antinatriuresis by a renal nerve-dependent mechanism,” Oct. 14, 2003, Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 2004, vol. 37, pp. 285-293.Applicant
- Standl, Thomas, M.D., et al, “Patient-controlled epidural analgesia reduces analgesic requirements compared to continuous epidural infusion after major abdominal surgery,” Aug. 29, 2002, Canada Journal of Anesthesia 2003, vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 258-264.Applicant
- Stone, Gregg W., M.D. et al., “Fenoldopam Mesylate for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy,” JAMA Nov. 5, 2003, vol. 290, No. 17, © 2003 American Medical Association, pp. 2284-2291.Applicant
- Sung, Duk Hyun, M.D. et al., “Phenol Block of Peripheral Nerve Conduction: Titrating for Optimum Effect,” Jun. 27, 2000, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 82, May 2001, pp. 671-676.Applicant
- Taler, Sandra J. et al., “Resistant Hypertension, Comparing Hemodynamic Management to Specialist Care,” Mar. 12, 2002, Hypertension 2002, vol. 39, 2002 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 982-988.Applicant
- Tay, Victoria KM et al., “Computed tomography fluoroscopy-guided chemical lumbar sympathectomy: Simple, safe and effective,” Oct. 31, 2001, Diagnostic Radiology, Australasian Radiology 2002, vol. 46, pp. 163-166.Applicant
- Thompson, Gregory W. et al, “Bradycardia Induced by Intravascular Versus Direct Stimulation of the Vagus Nerve,” Aug. 24, 1997, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 1998, pp. 637-642.Applicant
- Thrasher, Terry N., “Unloading arterial baroreceptors causes neurogenic hypertension,” Dec. 4, 2001, Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol., vol. 282, © 2002 the American Physiological Society, pp. R1044-R1053.Applicant
- Tokuno, Hajime A. et al., “Local anesthetic effects of cocaethylene and isopropylcocaine on rat peripheral nerves,” Oct. 7, 2003, Brain Research 996, 2004, © 2003 Elsevier B.V., pp. 159-167.Applicant
- Trapani, Angelo J. et al., “Neurohumoral interactions in conscious dehydrated rabbit,” Am J Physiol 1988, vol. 254, © 1988 the American Physiological Society, pp. R338-R347.Applicant
- Trock, David H. et al., “The Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Cervical Spine. Report of Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trials,” Mar. 22, 1994, The Journal of Rheumatology 1994, vol. 21, pp. 1903-1911.Applicant
- Troiano, Gregory C. et al., “The Reduction in Electroporation Voltages by the Addition of a Surfactant to Planar Lipid Bilayers,” May 12, 1998, Biophysical Journal, vol. 75, Aug. 1998, © the Biophysical Society, pp. 880-888.Applicant
- Trumble, Dennis R., and James A. Magovern, “Comparison of Dog and Pig Models for Testing Substernal Cardiac Compression Devices,” Nov. 2003, ASAIO Journal 2004, pp. 188-192.Applicant
- Tsai, E., “Intrathecal drug delivery for pain indications, technique, results,” Pain Lecture presentation, Jun. 8, 2001, 31 pages.Applicant
- Uematsu, Toshihiko, M.D., Ph.D., F.I.C.A. et al., “Extrinsic Innervation of the Canine Superior Vena Cava, Pulmonary, Portal and Renal Veins,” Angiology-Journal of Vascular Diseases, Aug. 1984, pp. 486-493.Applicant
- United States Renal Data System, “USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States,” National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2003, 593 pages.Applicant
- Upadhyay, Pramod, “Electroporation of the skin to deliver antigen by using a piezo ceramic gas igniter,” Jan. 27, 2001, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 217, © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 249-253.Applicant
- Valente, John F. et al., “Laparoscopic renal denervation for intractable ADPKD-related pain,” Aug. 24, 2000, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2001, vol. 16, European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association, p. 160.Applicant
- Velazquez, Eric J., “An international perspective on heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction complicating myocardial infarction: the VALIANT registry,” Aug. 5, 2004, European Heart Journal, vol. 25, © 2004 Elsevier Ltd., pp. 1911-1919.Applicant
- Velez-Roa, Sonia, M.D., et al., “Peripheral Sympathetic Control During Dobutamine Infusion: Effects of Aging and Heart Failure,” Jul. 7, 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2003, vol. 42, No. 9, © 2003 American College of Cardiology Foundation, pp. 1605-1610.Applicant
- Villarreal, Daniel et al., “Effects of renal denervation on postprandial sodium excretion in experimental heart failure,” Oct. 29, 1993, Am J Physiol 266, 1994, pp. R1599-R1604.Applicant
- Villarreal, Daniel et al., “Neurohumoral modulators and sodium balance in experimental heart failure,” Nov. 6, 1992, Am J Physiol, vol. 264, 1993, pp. H1187-H1193.Applicant
- Wagner, C.D. et al, “Very low frequency oscillations in arterial blood pressure after autonomic blockade in conscious dogs,” Feb. 5, 1997, Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1997, vol. 272, © 1997 the American Physiological Society, pp. 2034-2039.Applicant
- Wald, Jan D. Ph.D. et al., “Cardiology Update 2003,” Sep. 11, 2003, © 2003 AG Edwards, 120 pages.Applicant
- Wang, Xi et al., “Alterations of adenylyl cyclase and G proteins in aortocaval shut-induced heart failure,” Jul. 2004, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol., vol. 287, © 2004 the American Physiological Society, pp. H118-H125.Applicant
- Weaver, James C., “Electroporation: A General Phenomenon for Manipulating Cells and Tissues,” Oct. 22, 1992, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 51, © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc., pp. 426-435.Applicant
- Weiner, Richard L., M.D., “Peripheral nerve neurostimulation,” Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 2003, vol. 14, © 2003 Elsevier Inc., pp. 401-408.Applicant
- Weisbord, Steven D., M.D. and Paul M. Palevsky, M.D., “Radiocontrast-Induced Acute Renal Failure,” Jul. 10, 2004, Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2005, vol. 20 (2), © 2005 Sage Publications, pp. 63-75.Applicant
- Wolinsky, Harvey, M.D., Ph.D. and Swan N. Thung, M.D., “Use of a Perforated Balloon Catheter to Deliver Concentrated Heparin Into the Wall of the Normal Canine Artery,” Aug. 30, 1989, JACC 1990, vol. 15, © 1990 The American College of Cardiology, pp. 475-481.Applicant
- Wyss, J.Michael et al., “Neuronal control of the kidney: Contribution to hypertension,” Apr. 8, 1991, Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., vol. 70, 1992, pp. 759-770.Applicant
- Yamaguchi, Jun-ichi et al., “Prognostic Significance of Serum Creatinine Concentration for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Successful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the Heart Institute of Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction [HIJAMI] Registry),” Feb. 24, 2004, The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 93, Jun. 15, 2004, © 2004 by Excerpta Medica, Inc., pp. 1526-1528.Applicant
- Ye, Shaohua et al., “Renal Injury Caused by Intrarenal Injection of Phenol Increases Afferent and Efferent Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity,” Mar. 12, 2002, American Journal of Hypertension Aug. 2002, vol. 15, No. 8, © 2002 the American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. Published by Elsevier Science Inc., pp. 717-724.Applicant
- Young, James B., M.D., FACC, “Management of Chronic Heart Failure: What Do Recent Clinical Trials Teach Us?” Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine 2004, vol. 5, Suppl. 1, © 2004 MedReviews, LLC, pp. S3-S9.Applicant
- Zanchetti, A. et al., “Neural Control of the Kidney—Are There Reno-Renal Reflexes?” Clin. and Exper. Hyper. Theory and Practice, A6 (1&2), © 1984 Marcel Dekker Inc., pp. 275-286.Applicant
- Zimmermann, Ulrich, “Electrical Breakdown, Electropermeabilization and Electrofusion,” Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol., vol. 105, © Springer-Verlag 1986, pp. 175-256.Applicant
- Zucker, Irving H. et al., “The origin of sympathetic outflow in heart failure: the roles of angiotensin II and nitric oxide,” Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology 2004, vol. 84, © 2003 Elsevier Ltd., pp. 217-232.Applicant
- Zundert, Jan Van, M.D. FIPP and Alex Cahana, M.D. DAAPM, “Pulsed Radiofrequency in Chronic Pain Management: Looking for the Best Use of Electrical Current,” Pain Practice 2005, vol. 5, Issue 2, © 2005 World Institute of Pain, pp. 74-76.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,649, Demarais et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,723, Demarais et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,882, Demarais et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,890, Demarais et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,178, Levin et al.Applicant
- Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effect of renal sympathetic nerve stimulation on proximal water and sodium reabsorption,” J Clin Invest, 1976;57:1104-1107.Applicant
- Bhandari, A. and Ellias, M., “Loin pain hematuria syndrome: Pain control with RFA to the Splanchanic plexus,” The Pain Clinic, 2000, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 323-327.Applicant
- Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/363,867; Mailed on May 1, 2009, 8 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US05/35693, Mailed on Mar. 8, 2006, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 29 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US05/35757, Mailed on Dec. 27, 2006, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 8 pages.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US06/48822, Mailed on Aug. 15, 2008, Applicant: Ardian, Inc., 12 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/129,765; Mailed on May 18, 2007, 10 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/129,765; Mailed on Sep. 10, 2007, 5 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/129,765; Mailed on Oct. 6, 2006, 30 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/144,173. Mailed on Apr. 5, 2007, 33 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/144,173; Mailed on Sep. 10, 2007, 5 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,122; Mailed on Apr. 11, 2007, 33 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,122; Mailed on Sep. 10, 2007, 5 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/189,563; Mailed on May 28, 2009, 5 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action;U.S. Appl. No. 11/363,867; Mailed on Sep. 25, 2008, 10 pages.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/840,142; Mailed on Apr. 3, 2009, 13 pages.Applicant
- Osborn, et al., “Effect of renal nerve stimulation on renal blood flow autoregulation and antinatriuresis during reductions in renal perfusion pressure,” in Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 168, 77-81, 1981. (Abstract).Applicant
- Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effects of Acute Unilateral Renal Denervation in the Rat,” J Clin Invest, 1975;56:208-217.Applicant
- Katholi, R.E. et al., “Importance of the renal nerves in established two-kidney, one clip Goldblatt hypertension,” Hypertension, 1982, 4 (suppl II): 11-166-11-174.Applicant
- Katholi, R.E. et al., “Role of the renal nerves in the pathogenesis of one-kidney renal hypertension in the rat,” Hypertension, 1981, 3(4) 404-409.Applicant
- Katholi, R.E., “Renal nerves and hypertension: an update,” Fed Proc., 1985, 44:2846-2850.Applicant
- Non-Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 11/599,882; Mailed on Jul. 6, 2009, 13 pages.Applicant