US 7,538,338 B2Grant
Memory using variable tunnel barrier widths
Issue Date:2009-05-26
•30 Claims
•10 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A memory using a tunnel barrier is disclosed. A memory element includes a tunneling barrier and two conductive materials. The conductive material typically has mobile ions that either move towards or away from the tunneling barrier in response to a voltage across the memory element. A low conductivity region is irreversibly formed for one time programmable memory. The tunneling barrier can be formed by mobile ions combining with complementary ions. The low conductivity region increases the effective width of the tunnel barrier, making electrons tunnel a greater distance, which reduces the memory element's conductivity. By varying conductivity, multiple states can be created in the memory cell.
Metadata
Assignee
- Unity Semiconductor Corporation
Inventors
- Darrell Rinerson
- Christophe Chevallier
- Wayne Kinney
- Edmond Ward
Application Information
Application Number:US 10/934,951
Filing Date:2004-09-03
Priority Date:2004-09-03
Art Unit:2815
Classifications
IPC:
H01L45/00
Patent Drawings (10 sheets)
Description
Background of the Invention
[0001] 1. Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates to non-volatile computer memory.
[0003] 2. Description of the Related Art
[0004] Memory can either be classified as volatile or nonvolatile. Volatile memory is memory that loses its contents when the power is turned off. In contrast, non-volatile memory does not require a continuous power supply to retain information. Most non-volatile memories use solid-state memory devices as memory elements.
[0005] Since the 1960s, a large body of literature has evolved that describes switching and memory effects in metal-insulator-metal structures with thin insulators. One of the seminal works was “New Conduction and Reversible Memory Phenomena in Thin Insulating Films” by J. G. Simmons and R. R. Verderber in 301 Proc. Roy. Soc. 77-102 (1967), incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. Although the mechanisms described by Simmons and Verderber have since been cast into doubt, their contribution to the field is great.
[0006] However, nobody has successfully implemented a metal-insulator-metal structure into a commercial solid-state memory device. In the text “Oxides and Oxide Films,” volume 6, edited by A. K. Vijh (Marcel Drekker 1981) 251-325, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, chapter 4, written by David P. Oxley, is entirely devoted to “Memory Effects in Oxide Films.” In that text, Oxley says “It is perhaps saddening to have to record that, even after 10 years of effort, the number of applications for these oxide switches is so limited.” He goes on to describe a “need for caution before any application is envisaged. This caution can only be exercised when the physics of the switching action is understood; this, in turn, must await a full knowledge of the transport mechanisms operating in any switch for which a commercial use is envisaged.”
[0007] In 2002, over twenty years after writing that chapter, Oxley revisited the subject in “The Electroformed metal-insulator-metal structure: A comprehensive model” by R. E. Thurstans and D. P. Oxley 35 J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 802-809, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. In that article, the authors describe a model that identifies the conduction process as “trap-controlled and thermally activated tunneling between metal islands produced in the forming process.” “Forming” (or “electroforming”) is described as “the localized filamentary movement of metallic anode material through the dielectric, induced by the electric field. Here it is important to note that the evaporated dielectric may contain voids and departures from stoichiometry. When resulting filaments through the dielectric carry sufficient current, they rupture to leave a metal island structure embedded in the dielectric. Electronic conduction is possible through this structure by activating tunneling.”
[0008] However, the authors caution, “The forming process is complex and inherently variable. Also tunneling barriers are susceptible to changes in their characteristics when exposed to water vapour, organic species and oxygen . . . . Thus, device characteristics can never be expected to be produced consistently or be stable over long periods without passivation, effective encapsulation and a better understanding of the dynamics of the forming process.”
[0009] In seemingly unrelated research, certain conductive metal oxides (CMOs), have been identified as exhibiting a memory effect after being exposed to an electronic pulse. U.S. Pat. No. 6,204,139, issued Mar. 20, 2001 to Liu et al., incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, describes some perovskite materials that exhibit memory characteristics. The perovskite materials are also described by the same researchers in “Electric-pulse-induced reversible resistance change effect in magnetoresistive films,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 76, No. 19, 8 May 2000, and “A New Concept for Non-Volatile Memory: The Electric-Pulse Induced Resistive Change Effect in Colossal Magnetoresistive Thin Films,” in materials for the 2001 Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
[0010] In U.S. Pat. No. 6,531,371 entitled “Electrically programmable resistance cross point memory” by Hsu et al, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, resistive cross point memory devices are disclosed along with methods of manufacture and use. The memory device comprises an active layer of perovskite material interposed between upper electrodes and lower electrodes.
[0011] Similarly, the IBM Zurich Research Center has also published three technical papers that discuss the use of metal oxide material for memory applications: “Reproducible switching effect in thin oxide films for memory applications,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 77, No. 1, 3 Jul. 2000, “Current-driven insulator-conductor transition and nonvolatile memory in chromium-doped SrTiO3 single crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 78, No. 23, 4 Jun. 2001, and “Electric current distribution across a metal-insulator-metal structure during bistable switching,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 90, No. 6, 15 Sep. 2001, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
[0012] There are continuing efforts to incorporate solid state memory devices into a commercial non-volatile RAM.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0013] The invention may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0014] FIG. 1A depicts a perspective view of an exemplary cross point memory array employing a single layer of memory;
[0015] FIG. 1B depicts a perspective view of an exemplary stacked cross point memory array employing four layer of memory;
[0016] FIG. 2A depicts a plan view of selection of a memory cell in the cross point array depicted in FIG. 1A ;
[0017] FIG. 2B depicts a perspective view of the boundaries of the selected memory cell depicted in FIG. 2A ;
[0018] FIG. 3 depicts a generalized cross-sectional representation of a memory cell that can be used in a transistor memory array;
[0019] FIG. 4A depicts a block diagram of a representative implementation of an exemplary 1 MB memory;
[0020] FIG. 4B depicts a block diagram of an exemplary memory that includes sensing circuits that are capable of reading multiple bits;
[0021] FIG. 5A depicts a block diagram representing the basic components of a memory element;
[0022] FIG. 5B depicts a block diagram of the memory element of FIG. 5A in a two-terminal memory cell;
[0023] FIG. 5C depicts a block diagram of the memory element in a three-terminal memory cell;
[0024] FIG. 6A depicts a block diagram of the memory cell of FIG. 5B where oxygen accumulation near the tunnel barrier—oxygen reservoir interface results in a low conductivity region;
[0025] FIG. 6B depicts a block diagram of the memory cell of FIG. 5B where oxygen depletion near the tunnel barrier—oxygen reservoir interface results in a low conductivity region;
[0026] FIG. 6C depicts two block diagrams where a redox reaction between the oxygen reservoir and a complementary reservoir results in a low conductivity region; and
[0027] FIG. 6D depicts a block diagram where a low conductivity region is initially fabricated, and then reduced to shrink the effective tunnel barrier width
[0028] It is to be understood that, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate like structural elements. Also, it is understood that the depictions in the FIGs. are not necessarily to scale.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
[0029] In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process steps have not been described in detail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.
The Memory Array
[0030] Conventional nonvolatile memory requires three terminal MOSFET-based devices. The layout of such devices is not ideal, usually requiring an area of at least 8f2 for each memory cell, where f is the minimum feature size. However, not all memory elements require three terminals. If, for example, a memory element is capable of changing its electrical properties (e.g., resistivity) in response to a voltage pulse, only two terminals are required. With only two terminals, a cross point array layout that allows a single cell to be fabricated to a size of 4f2 can be utilized.
[0031] FIG. 1A depicts a perspective view of an exemplary cross point memory array 100 employing a single layer of memory. A bottom layer of x-direction conductive array lines 105 is orthogonal to a top layer of y-direction conductive array lines 110. The x-direction conductive array lines 105 act as a first terminal and the y-direction conductive array lines 10 act as a second terminal to a plurality of memory plugs 115, which are located at the intersections of the conductive array lines 105 and 110. The conductive array lines 105 and 10 are used to both deliver a voltage pulse to the memory plugs 115 and carry current through the memory plugs 115 in order to determine their resistive states.
[0032] Conductive array line layers 105 and 110 can generally be constructed of any conductive material, such as aluminum, copper, tungsten or certain ceramics. Depending upon the material, a conductive array line would typically cross between 64 and 8192 perpendicular conductive array lines. Fabrication techniques, feature size and resistivity of material may allow for shorter or longer lines. Although the x-direction and y-direction conductive array lines can be of equal lengths (forming a square cross point array) they can also be of unequal lengths (forming a rectangular cross point array), which may be useful if they are made from different materials with different resistivities.
[0033] FIG. 2A illustrates selection of a memory cell 205 in the cross point array 100. The point of intersection between a single x-direction conductive array line 210 and a single y-direction conductive array line 215 uniquely identifies the single memory cell 205. FIG. 2B illustrates the boundaries of the selected memory cell 205. The memory cell is a repeatable unit that can be theoretically extended in one, two or even three dimensions. One method of repeating the memory cells in the z-direction (orthogonal to the x-y plane) is to use both the bottom and top surfaces of conductive array lines 105 and 110, creating a stacked cross point array.
[0034] FIG. 1B depicts an exemplary stacked cross point array 150 employing four memory layers 155, 160, 165, and 170. The memory layers are sandwiched between alternating layers of x-direction conductive array lines 175, 180 and 185 and y-direction conductive array lines 190 and 195 such that each memory layer 155, 160, 165, and 170 is associated with only one x-direction conductive array line layer and one y-direction conductive array line layer. Although the top conductive array line layer 185 and bottom conductive array line layer 175 are only used to supply voltage to a single memory layer 155 and 170, the other conductive array line layers 180, 190, and 195 can be used to supply voltage to both a top and a bottom memory layer 155, 160, 165, or 170.
[0035] Referring back to FIG. 2B , the repeatable cell that makes up the cross point array 100 can be considered to be a memory plug 255, plus ½ of the space around the memory plug, plus ½ of an x-direction conductive array line 210 and ½ of a y-direction conductive array line 215. Of course, ½ of a conductive array line is merely a theoretical construct, since a conductive array line would generally be fabricated to the same width, regardless of whether one or both surfaces of the conductive array line was used. Accordingly, the very top and very bottom layers of conductive array lines (which use only one surface) would typically be fabricated to the same size as all other layers of conductive array lines.
[0036] One benefit of the cross point array is that the active circuitry that drives the cross point array 100 or 150 can be placed beneath the cross point array, therefore reducing the footprint required on a semiconductor substrate. However, the cross point array is not the only type of memory array that can be used with a two-terminal memory element. For example, a two-dimensional transistor memory array can incorporate a two-terminal memory element. While the memory element in such an array would be a two-terminal device, the entire memory cell would be a three-terminal device.
[0037] FIG. 3 is a generalized diagrammatic representation of a memory cell 300 that can be used in a transistor memory array. Each memory cell 300 includes a transistor 305 and a memory plug 310. The transistor 305 is used to permit current from the data line 315 to access the memory plug 310 when an appropriate voltage is applied to the select line 320, which is also the transistor's gate. The reference line 325 might span two cells if the adjacent cells are laid out as the mirror images of each other.
Memory Chip Configuration
[0038] FIG. 4A is a block diagram of a representative implementation of an exemplary 1 MB memory 400A. Physical layouts might differ, but each memory bit block 405 can be formed on a separate portion of a semiconductor substrate. Input signals into the memory 400A can include an address bus 430, a control bus 440, some power supplies 450 (typically Vcc and ground—the other signals of bus 450 can be internally generated by the 1 MB memory 400A), and a data bus 460. The control bus 440 typically includes signals to select the chip, to signal whether a read or write operation should be performed, and to enable the output buffers when the chip is in read mode. The address bus 430 specifies which location in the memory array is accessed—some addresses going to the X block 470 (typically including a predecoder and an X-decoder) to select one line out of the horizontal array lines. The other addresses go to a Y block 480 (typically including a predecoder and a Y-decoder) to apply the appropriate voltage on specific vertical lines. Each memory bit block 405 operates on one line of the memory chip data bus 460.
[0039] The reading of data from a memory array 420 is relatively straightforward: an x-line is energized, and current is sensed by the sensing circuits 410 on the energized y-lines and converted to bits of information. FIG. 4B is a block diagram of an exemplary memory 400B that includes sensing circuits 415 that are capable of reading multiple bits. The simultaneous reading of multiple bits involves sensing current from multiple y-lines simultaneously.
[0040] During a write operation, the data is applied from the data bus 460 to the input buffers and data drivers 490 to the selected vertical lines, or bit lines. Specifically, when binary information is sent to the memory chip 400B, it is stored in latch circuits within the circuits 495. Within the circuits 495, each y-line can either have an associated driver circuit or a group of y-lines can share a single driver circuit if the non-selected lines in the group are held to a constant voltage that would not cause the unselected memory plugs to experience any change in resistance. As an example, there may be 1024 y-lines in a cross point array, and the page register may include 8 latches, in which case the y-block would decode 1 out of 128 y-lines and connect the selected lines to block 495. The driver circuit then writes the 1 or 0 to the appropriate memory plug. The writing can be performed in multiple cycles. In a scheme described in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US04/13836, filed May 3, 2004, incorporated herein by reference, all the 1s can be written during a first cycle and all the 0s can be written during a second cycle. As described below, certain memory plugs can have multiple stable distinct resistive states. With such multi-level resistance memory plugs, driver circuits could program, for example, states of 00, 01, 10 or 11 by varying write voltage magnitude or pulse length. Regardless of how the write operations and the read operations are implemented, they can collectively be described as the normal operations of the memory array 420 and are, of course, dictated by the specific chip architecture that is used.
[0041] It is to be noted that such an architecture can be expanded to create a memory where one array handles all the bits of the data bus, as opposed to having multiple arrays, or memory bit blocks as described above. For example, if the data bus, or memory data organization, also called data width, is 16-bit wide, the y-block of one cross point array can be made to decode 16 lines simultaneously. By applying the techniques of simultaneous reads and 2-cycle writes, such a memory chip with only one array can read and program 16-bit words.
Memory Plug
[0042] Each memory plug contains layers of materials that may be desirable for fabrication or functionality. For example, a non-ohmic characteristic that exhibit a very high resistance regime for a certain range of voltages (VNO− to VNO+) and a very low resistance regime for voltages above and below that range might be desirable. In a cross point array, a non-ohmic characteristic could prevent leakage during reads and writes if half of both voltages were within the range of voltages VNO− to VNO+. If each conductive array line carried ½ VW, the current path would be the memory plug at the intersection of the two conductive array lines that each carried ½ VW. The other memory plugs would exhibit such high resistances from the non-ohmic characteristic that current would not flow through the half-selected plugs.
[0043] A non-ohmic device might be used to cause the memory plug to exhibit a non-linear resistive characteristic. Exemplary non-ohmic devices include three-film metal-insulator-metal (MIM) structures and back-to-back diodes in series. Separate non-ohmic devices, however, may not be necessary. Certain fabrications of the memory plug can cause a non-ohmic characteristic to be imparted to the memory cell. While a non-ohmic characteristic might be desirable in certain arrays, it may not be required in other arrays.
[0044] Electrodes will typically be desirable components of the memory plugs, a pair of electrodes sandwiching the memory element. If the only purpose of the electrodes is as a barrier to prevent metal inter-diffusion, then a thin layer of non-reactive metal, e.g. TiN, TaN, Pt, Au, and certain metal oxides could be used. However, electrodes may provide advantages beyond simply acting as a metal inter-diffusion barrier. Electrodes (formed either with a single layer or multiple layers) can perform various functions, including: prevent the diffusion of metals, oxygen, hydrogen and water; act as a seed layer in order to form a good lattice match with other layers; act as adhesion layers; reduce stress caused by uneven coefficients of thermal expansion; and provide other benefits. Additionally, the choice of electrode layers can affect the memory effect properties of the memory plug and become part of the memory element.
[0045] The “memory element electrodes” are the electrodes (or, in certain circumstances, the portion of the conductive array lines) that the memory elements are sandwiched in-between. As used herein, memory element electrodes are what allow other components to be electrically connected to the memory element. It should be noted that both cross point arrays and transistor memory arrays have exactly two memory element electrodes since the memory plug has exactly two terminals, regardless of how many terminals the memory cell has. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a floating gate transistor, if used as a memory element, would have exactly three memory element electrodes (source, drain and gate).
Memory Effect
[0046] The memory effect is a hysteresis that exhibits a resistive state change upon application of a voltage while allowing non-destructive reads. A non-destructive read means that the read operation has no effect on the resistive state of the memory element. Measuring the resistance of a memory cell is generally accomplished by detecting either current after the memory cell is held to a known voltage, or voltage after a known current flows through the memory cell. Therefore, a memory cell that is placed in a high resistive state R0 upon application of −VW and a low resistive state R1 upon application of +VW should be unaffected by a read operation performed at −VR or +VR. In such materials a write operation is not necessary after a read operation. It should be appreciated that the magnitude of |−VR| does not necessarily equal the magnitude of |+VR|.
[0047] Furthermore, it is possible to have a memory cell that can be switched between resistive states with voltages of the same polarity. For example, in the paper “The Electroformed metal-insulator-metal structure: a comprehensive model,” already incorporated by reference, Thurstans and Oxley describe a memory that maintains a low resistive state until a certain VP is reached. After VP is reached the resistive state can be increased with voltages. After programming, the high resistive state is then maintained until a VT is reached. The VT is sensitive to speed at which the program voltage is removed from the memory cell. In such a system, programming R1 would be accomplished with a voltage pulse of VP, programming R0 would be accomplished with a voltage pulse greater than VP, and reads would occur with a voltages below VT. Intermediate resistive states (for multi-level memory cells) are also possible.
[0048] The R1 state of the memory plug may have a best value of 10 kΩ to 100 kΩ. If the R1 state resistance is much less than 10 kΩ, the current consumption will be increased because the cell current is high, and the parasitic resistances will have a larger effect. If the R1 state value is much above 100 kΩ, the RC delays will increase access time. However, workable single state resistive values may also be achieved with resistances as low as 5 kΩ and as high as 1 MΩ. Typically, a single state memory would have the operational resistances of R0 and R1 separated by a factor of 10.
[0049] Since memory plugs can be placed into several different resistive states, multi-bit resistive memory cells are possible. Changes in the resistive property of the memory plugs that are greater than a factor of 10 might be desirable in multi-bit resistive memory cells. For example, the memory plug might have a high resistive state of R00, a medium-high resistive state of R01, a medium-low resistive state of R10 and a low resistive state of R11. Since multi-bit memories typically have access times longer than single-bit memories, using a factor greater than a 10 times change in resistance from R11 to R00 is one way to make a multi-bit memory as fast as a single-bit memory. For example, a memory cell that is capable of storing two bits might have the low resistive state be separated from the high resistive state by a factor of 100. A memory cell that is capable of storing three or four bits of information might require the low resistive state be separated from the high resistive state by a factor of 1000.
Creating the Memory Effect
[0050] Tunneling is a process whereby electrons pass through a barrier in the presence of an electric field. Tunneling Is exponentially dependant on a barrier's width and the square root of its height. Barrier height is typically defined as the potential difference between the Fermi energy of a first conducting material and the band edge of a second insulating material. The Fermi energy is that energy at which the probability of occupation of an electron suite is 50%. Barrier width is the physical thickness of the insulating material.
[0051] The barrier height might be modified if carriers or ions are introduced into the second insulating material, creating an additional electric field. A barrier's width can be changed if the barrier physically changes shape, either growing or shrinking. In the presence of a high electric field, both mechanisms could result in a change in conductivity.
[0052] Although the following discussion focuses mainly on purposefully modifying the barrier width, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other mechanisms can be present (but not controlling), including (but not limited to) barrier height modification, carrier charge trapping space-charge limited currents, thermionic emission limited conduction, and/or electrothermal Poole-Frenkel emission.
[0053] FIG. 5A is a block diagram representing the basic components of a memory element 500, FIG. 5B is a block diagram of the memory element 500 in a two-terminal memory cell, and FIG. 5C is a block diagram of the memory element in a three-terminal memory cell.
[0054] FIG. 5A shows a tunnel barrier 505 and an ion reservoir 510, two basic components of the memory element 500. FIG. 5B shows the memory element 500 between a top memory electrode 515 and a bottom memory electrode 520. The orientation of the memory element (i.e., whether the tunnel barrier 505 is near the top memory electrode 515 or the bottom memory electrode 520) may be important for processing considerations, including the necessity of seed layers and how the tunnel barrier reacts with the ion reservoir 510 during deposition. FIG. 5C shows the memory element 500 oriented with the tunnel barrier 505 on the bottom in a three-terminal transistor device, having a source memory element electrode 525, gate memory element electrode 530 and a drain memory element electrode 535. In such an orientation, the tunnel barrier 505 could also function as a gate oxide.
[0055] Referring back to FIG. 5A , the tunnel barrier 505 will typically be less than 50 angstroms. If the tunnel barrier 505 is much greater than 50 angstroms, then the electric field that is required to move electrons through the memory element 500 via tunneling becomes too high for most electronic devices. Depending on the tunnel barrier 505 material, a preferred tunnel barrier 505 width might be between 15 and 20 angstroms for circuits where rapid access times (on the order of tens of nanoseconds, typically below 100 ns) in small dimension devices (on the order of hundreds of nanometers) are desired.
[0056] Fundamentally, the tunnel barrier 505 is an insulator. While some embodiments have other requirements of the tunnel barrier 505 (e.g., being permeable to positive or negative ions, as described in connection with FIG. 6C ), the main conduction mechanism through the tunnel barrier 505 should be tunneling. Insulators suitable for some embodiments include various metal oxides such as Al2O3, Ta2O5 and HfO2. The tunnel barrier 505 will typically be of very high quality, being as uniform as possible to allow for predictability in the voltage required to obtain a current through the memory element 500. Atomic layer deposition and plasma oxidation are examples of methods that can be used to create very high quality tunnel barriers. Although tunnel barriers can be obtained by allowing a reactive metal to simply come in contact with an ion reservoir 510, as described in PCT International Application No. PCT/US2004/013836, filed May 3, 2004, already incorporated herein by reference, such barriers may be of low quality and lacking uniformity.
[0057] The electric field at the tunnel barrier 505 is typically high enough to promote tunneling at thicknesses less than 50 angstroms. The electric field is typically higher than the electric field at other points in the circuit due to factors such as the relatively high serial resistance of the tunnel barrier 505 compared to the rest of the circuit and the accumulation of charge at the interface. The electric field not only enables tunneling, but, with the appropriate ion reservoir 510, also allows the effective width of the tunnel barrier 505 to change.
[0058] The ion reservoir 510 is a material that is conductive enough to allow current to flow and has mobile ions. The ion reservoir 510 can be, for example, an oxygen reservoir with mobile oxygen ions. Oxygen ions are negative in charge, and will flow in the direction opposite of current. As will be described in FIG. 6A , FIG. 6B, FIG. 6C , and FIG. 6D the movement of oxygen ions can potentially modify the effective barrier width in various ways.
[0059] FIG. 6A is a block diagram where oxygen accumulation near the tunnel barrier 505—oxygen reservoir 625 interface results in a low conductivity region 605. This low conductivity region 605 is cumulative with the tunnel barrier 505, forcing electrons to tunnel a greater distance to reach the second memory element electrode 520. Because of the exponential effect of barrier width on tunneling, the low conductivity region 605 can be just a few angstroms wide and still have a very noticeable effect on the memory element's effective resistance.
[0060] For a low conductivity region 605 to be created in the oxygen reservoir 625 it must have the physical property of being less conductive in an oxygen-rich state. An example of a conductive material that has mobile oxygen ions and is less conductive in an oxygen-rich state is reduced strontium titanate (STO) and similar perovskites (a perovskite generally being in the form of an ABX3 structure, where A has an atomic size of 1.0-1.4 Å and B has an atomic size of 0.45-0.75 Å for the case where X is either oxygen or fluorine). If data retention is important, the oxygen-rich state should be stable enough to resist the migratory force that results from a concentration gradient.
[0061] Furthermore, it may be important to either avoid or maintain an oxygen-deficient state in the bulk of the oxygen reservoir 625 to maintain conductivity. In such a circumstance, a larger oxygen reservoir 625 will allow for the oxygen-deficient effects to be distributed throughout the material. For example, if the oxygen reservoir 625 is a perovskite it might be important that the ABO3 structure have a slight oxygen deficiency in order to maintain conductivity. If two atomic layers of stoichiometric ABO3 were sufficient to produce an appropriate low conductivity region 605, then 400 atomic layers of ABO3-x would (assuming a constant deficiency gradient) vary the oxygen deficiency of the ABO3-x oxygen reservoir 625 by 0.5%. Accordingly, both states of the oxygen reservoir 625 (i.e., with and without the excess oxygen from the low conductivity region 605) should be conductive. Of course, if oxygen were available from other sources (e.g., if the first memory element electrode 515 were exposed to the atmosphere and permeable to oxygen) the height of the oxygen reservoir 625 may not be as critical.
[0062] If the memory element 500 is to be reprogrammable, then a voltage of opposite polarity should be sufficient to push the excess oxygen out of the low conductivity region 605 and back into the oxygen deficient regions of the oxygen reservoir 625. Depending upon whether the activation energy of reducing the low conductivity region 605 in a redox reaction is greater than or less than the energy required to create the low conductivity region can inform the read polarity choice. If reducing the low conductivity region 605 with a positive voltage takes more energy than creating an oxygen-rich conductivity region 605 with a negative voltage, then positive reads have a lesser chance of disturbing the resistive state of the memory element.
[0063] FIG. 6B is a block diagram where oxygen depletion near the tunnel barrier 505—oxygen reservoir 630 interface results in a low conductivity region 610. For a low conductivity region 610 to be created in the oxygen reservoir 630 it must have the physical property of being less conductive in an oxygen-deficient state. Some examples of materials that have mobile oxygen ions and are less conductive in an oxygen-deficient state are Pr0.7Ca0.3MnO3, Pr0.5Ca0.5MnO3 and other PCMO perovskites.
[0064] Similar to the embodiment of FIG. 6A , data retention would be improved if the oxygen-deficient state were stable enough to resist the migratory force that results from a concentration gradient. Additionally, reprogramability would require an opposite polarity voltage that is capable of replacing the oxygen deficiencies of the low conductivity region 610.
[0065] FIG. 6C shows two block diagrams where a redox reaction between the oxygen reservoir 635 and a complementary reservoir 615 results in a low conductivity region 620. In the case where the ion reservoir 510 (see FIG. 5A ) is made up of negative oxygen ions, an appropriate complementary reservoir 615 would include mobile positively charged metal ions (designated as M+ in FIG. 6C ). The mechanism is similar to the embodiment of FIG. 6A , except positively charged metal ions M+ migrate through the tunnel barrier 505 to combine with oxygen ions O− in the oxygen reservoir 635, creating the low conductivity region 620. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that redox reaction can occur at either the top or bottom surface of the tunnel barrier 505. As shown in the first diagram on the left side of the drawing sheet of FIG. 6C , the low conductivity region 620 will form at the top of the tunnel barrier 505 if the mobility of the complementary ions M+ is greater than the mobility of the oxygen ions through the tunnel barrier 505. Conversely, it the mobility of oxygen ions O− is greater than the mobility of the complementary ions M+ through the tunnel barrier 505, then the low conductivity region 620 will form at the bottom of the tunnel barrier 505 as shown in the second diagram on the right side of the drawing sheet of FIG. 6C . In the first diagram the free oxygen ions (designated as O− in FIG. 6C ) in the oxygen reservoir 635 do not move into the tunnel barrier 505. In the second diagram the free metal ions M+ the metal reservoir 615 do not move into the tunnel barrier 505. In either case the metal reservoir 615 is any material that is conductive enough to allow current to flow and has free metal ions M+. For ease of fabrication, the metal reservoir 615 may be the non-oxidized form (either the bare metal(s) or the reduced non-stoichiometric oxide) of the same material that is used for the tunnel barrier 505.
[0066] Data retention will typically be very good in a metal reservoir embodiment because metal oxides are usually very stable. In fact, reversing the redox reaction requires a great amount of energy for many oxides, making the cells most useful for one-time programmable memories. Oxides with a low activation energy are required if a reprogrammable memory is desired.
[0067] For one-time programmable memories where a complementary voltage pulse has very little effect on the effective tunnel barrier width, it would typically be most beneficial to use the complementary polarity during reads to prevent disturb. The polarity of the voltage that creates the low conductivity region 620 would only be used during writes.
[0068] Furthermore, since the effective width of the barrier is limited only by the effect of ion deficiency in the ion reservoir and the availability of ions in the complimentary reservoir, many different barrier widths can be formed if large enough reservoirs are used. Accordingly, multiple bits per cell can be easily implemented with different resistive states.
[0069] It should be appreciated that the term “memory element” includes all the layers that contribute to the memory effect. Accordingly, in the embodiment of FIG. 6C , the memory element includes the oxygen reservoir 635, the low conductivity region 620 (when the memory cell is in the high resistive state), the tunnel barrier 505, and the metal reservoir 615. When the memory element is in the low resistive state, the tunnel barrier 505 has the lowest conductivity (i.e., the highest series resistance) relative to all the other layers of the memory element, including the oxygen reservoir 635 and the entire metal reservoir 615 as neither of these would have a low conductivity region 620 in the low resistive state.
[0070] FIG. 6D is a block diagram where a low conductivity region 645 is initially fabricated, and then reduced to shrink the effective tunnel barrier width. Since the memory element is initially fabricated with the low conductivity region 645, an appropriate voltage would reduce the material into more conductive components. This embodiment will typically be used only in reprogrammable memory cells because the activation energy to re-oxide the material is typically not very high.
[0071] It should be appreciated that the problem of an oxygen-deficient oxygen reservoir 640 is then diminished since the oxygen reservoir 640 does not need to supply any oxygen ions to the low conductivity region 645. However, the oxygen reservoir 640 will need to be able to maintain its conductivity once the excess oxygen ions are removed from the low conductivity region 645 and dispersed into the oxygen reservoir 640. In such an embodiment, the tunnel barrier 505 and the low conductivity region 645 could be a single material for ease of fabrication.
Concluding Remarks
[0072] Although the invention has been described in its presently contemplated best mode, it is clear that it is susceptible to numerous modifications, modes of operation and embodiments, all within the ability and skill of those familiar with the art and without exercise of further inventive activity. For example, although the ion reservoir was described as being negative in connection with the oxygen reservoir, a positively charged ion reservoir may have the same functionality, as long as the other physical requirements of the specific embodiments are met. Furthermore, while redox reactions is one possible explanation of how the various materials interact, the inventors do not wish to be bound by any explanation of how the low conductivity region is created, as other mechanisms, such as phase change, may be involved. Accordingly, that which is intended to be protected by letters Patent is set forth in the claims and includes all variations and modifications that fall within the spirit and scope of the claim.
Claims
Certificate of Correction present
The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.
What is claimed is:
1. A one time programmable memory element, comprising:
an electronically insulating tunneling barrier having a conductivity;
a first material that has a higher conductivity than the tunneling barrier and is in series with the tunneling barrier; and
a second material that has an unprogrammed conductivity higher than the tunneling barrier and is in series with the tunneling barrier;
wherein the tunneling barrier is disposed in between the first material and the second material;
wherein an electric field across the tunneling barrier is effective to promote ion motion through the tunneling barrier to the second material, mobile ions being effective to create a low conductivity region within the second material, the low conductivity region having a lower conductivity than the unprogrammed conductivity; and
wherein the memory element exhibits an unprogrammed resistance when the second material does not have a low conductivity region and a programmed resistance when the second material includes a low conductivity region, the unprogrammed resistance having a lower resistance than the programmed resistance.
2. The one tine programmable memory of claim 1 wherein the mobile ions are mobile oxygen ions.
3. The one time programmable memory of claim 2 wherein the second material is a metal and the low conductivity region is an oxide.
4. The one time programmable memory of claim 2 wherein the first material is a perovskite.
5. The one time programmable memory of claim 1 wherein the electric field is caused by a programming voltage across the tunneling barrier, the programming voltage being of a polarity effective to cause oxygen ions to move towards the second material.
6. The one time programmable memory of claim 5 wherein read voltages are used to determine whether the memory element exhibits a programmed resistance or an unprogrammed resistance, the read voltages being opposite in polarity to the programming voltage.
7. The one time programmable memory of claim 1 wherein the memory element exhibits multiple programmed resistances depending upon a width of the low conductivity region, each programmed resistance having a higher resistance than the unprogrammed resistance.
8. A re-programmable memory element, comprising:
an electronically insulating tunneling barrier having a conductivity;
a first material that has a higher conductivity than the tunneling barrier; and
a second material that has a first conductivity higher than the tunneling barrier, the tunneling barrier is disposed in between the first material and the second material, and the first material, the tunneling barrier, and the second material are electrically in series with one another,
wherein a first electric field across the tunneling barrier is operative to promote ion movement from the first material through the tunneling barrier to the second material, the ions operative to create a low conductivity region within the second material, the low conductivity region having a lower conductivity than the first conductivity,
wherein a second electric field across the tunneling barrier is operative to promote ion movement from the second material through the tunneling barrier to the first material, the ions operative to remove the low conductivity region within the second material, and the second electric field having a direction opposite to the first electric field, and
wherein the memory element exhibits a first resistance when the second material does not have the low conductivity region arid exhibits a second resistance when the second material includes the low conductivity region, the first resistance having a lower resistance than the second resistance.
9. The re-programmable memory element of claim 8, wherein a read voltage applied across the first and second materials is operative to generate a read current indicative of the first resistance or the second resistance.
10. The re-programmable memory element of claim 8, wherein the first resistance and the second resistance are retained in the absence of electrical power.
11. The re-programmable memory element of claim 8, wherein the electronically insulating tunnel barrier includes a barrier width and the low conductivity region is cumulative with the electronically insulating tunnel barrier so that an effective width of the electronically insulating tunnel barrier increases when the second material includes the low conductivity region.
12. The re-programmable memory element of claim 8, wherein the electronically insulating tunnel barrier has a thickness that is less than approximately 50 Angstroms.
13. The re-programmable memory element of claim 12, wherein the low conductivity region has a thickness that is less than the thickness of the electronically insulating tunnel barrier.
14. The re-programmable memory element of claim 8, wherein the ions are oxygen ions.
15. The re-programmable memory element of claim 8, wherein the electronically insulating tunnel barrier is permeable to ions.
16. The re-programmable memory element of claim 8, wherein the first material is a perovskite.
17. The re-programmable memory element of claim 8, wherein the second material is a perovskite.
18. The re-programmable memory element of claim 17, wherein the perovskite is reduced strontium titanate (STO).
19. The re-programmable memory element of claim 8, wherein the low conductivity region comprises an oxidized layer of the second material.
20. The re-programmable memory element of claim 8, wherein the memory element includes a feature size of not more than about 4f2, with f being a minimum fabrication line width.
21. The re-programmable memory element of claim 20, wherein an effective feature size of the memory element is not more than about 1f2 and the effective feature size includes a plurality of the memory elements stacked upon each other in a vertical configuration.
22. The re-programmable memory element of claim 21, wherein an effective feature size of the memory element is not more than about 0.5f2and the effective feature size includes the number of bits of data that can be stored in each memory element.
23. The one time programmable memory element of claim 1, wherein the electronically insulating tunnel barrier comprises a metal oxide.
24. The one time programmable memory element of claim 1, wherein the electronically insulating tunnel barrier has a thickness that is less than approximately 50 Angstroms.
25. The one time programmable memory element of claim 24, wherein the low conductivity region has a thickness that is less than the thickness of the electronically insulating tunnel barrier.
26. The one time programmable memory element of claim 1, wherein the electronically insulating tunnel barrier is permeable to ions.
27. The one time programmable memory element of claim 1, wherein the second material comprises a non-oxidized form of a material used for the electronically insulating tunnel barrier.
28. The one time programmable memory element of claim 1, wherein the one time programmable memory element includes a feature size of not more than about 4f2, with f being a minimum fabrication line width.
29. The one time programmable memory element of claim 28, wherein an effective feature size of the one time programmable memory element is not more than about 1f2 and the effective feature size includes a plurality of the one time programmable memory elements stacked upon each other in a vertical configuration.
30. The one time programmable memory element of claim 29, wherein an effective feature size of the one time programmable memory element is not more than about 0.5f2 and the effective feature size includes the number of bits of data that can be stored in each one time programmable memory element.
Patent Citations (28)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3886577(A) | 1975-05-01 | Buckley | Applicant |
| US5296716(A) | 1994-03-01 | Ovshinsky et al. | Applicant |
| US5894135(A) | 1999-04-01 | Yamamoto et al. | Examiner |
| US6473332(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Ignatiev et al. | Applicant |
| US6487106(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Kozicki | Applicant |
| US6531371(B2) | 2003-03-01 | Hsu et al. | Applicant |
| US6657888(B1) | 2003-12-01 | Doudin et al. | Applicant |
| US6753561(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Rinerson et al. | Applicant |
| US6807088(B2) | 2004-10-01 | Tsuchida | Applicant |
| US6825489(B2) | 2004-11-01 | Kozicki | Applicant |
| US6834013(B2) | 2004-12-01 | Fan et al. | Examiner |
| US6836421(B2) | 2004-12-01 | Rinerson et al. | Applicant |
| US6856536(B2) | 2005-02-01 | Rinerson et al. | Applicant |
| US6939724(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Zhuang et al. | Applicant |
| US6998698(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Inoue et al. | Applicant |
| US7002197(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Perner et al. | Applicant |
| US7005717(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Eisenbeiser et al. | Examiner |
| US7029924(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Hsu et al. | Applicant |
| US7060586(B2) | 2006-06-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US7148533(B2) | 2006-12-01 | Hsu et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0003675(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Hsu | Applicant |
| US2003/0132456(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Miyai et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0141369(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Noguchi | Applicant |
| US2005/0135148(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Chevallier et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0151156(A1) | 2005-07-01 | Wu et al. | Applicant |
| EP1376598(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1376598(B1) | 2004-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WOPCT/US2004/013836 | 2004-05-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (21)
- A. Beck, J. Bednorz, A. Bietsch, Ch. Gerber, C. Rossel, D. Widmer, “Reproducible switching effect in thin oxide films for memory applications,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 77, No. 1, Jul. 3, 2000, pp. 139-141.Applicant
- Liu et al., “Electric-pulse-induced reversible resistance change effect in magnetoresistive films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, No. 19, May 8, 2000, pp. 2749-2751.Applicant
- Liu et al., “A New Concept for Non-Volatile Memory: The Electric-Pulse Induced Resistive Change Effect in Colossal Magnetoresistive Thin Films,” Non-Volatile Memory Technolgy Symposium, Nov. 7, 2001, pp. 1-7.Applicant
- David Oxley, “Memory Effects in Oxide Films” in Oxides and Oxide Films, vol. 6, pp. 251-325 (Chapter 4) (Ashok K. Vijh ed., Marcel Drekker) (1981).Applicant
- J.G. Simmons and R.R. Verderber, “New Conduction and Reversible Memory Phenomena in Thin Insulating Films,” Proc. Roy. Soc. A., 301 (1967), pp. 77-102.Applicant
- R.E. Thurstans and D.P. Oxley, “The Electroformed metal-insulator-metal structure: A comprehensive model,” J. Phys. D.: Appl. Phys. 35 (2002), Apr. 2, 2002, pp. 802-809.Applicant
- Y. Watanabe, J.G. Bednorz, A. Bietsch, Ch. Gerber, D. Widmer, A. Beck, “Current-driven insulator-conductor transition and nonvolatile memory in chromium-doped SrTiO3 single crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78, No. 23, Jun. 4, 2001, pp. 3738-3740.Applicant
- Mathew Crewley et al., “512 MB PROM with 8 Layers of Antifuse/Diode Cells” of Paper 16.4 in 2003 IEEE ISSCC, First Edition, , pp. 284-285, 493 (Feb. 2003).Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 60/536,115, filed Jan. 13, 2004, Wu et al.Applicant
- A.Baikalov, et al, “Field -driven hysteretic and reversible resistive switch at the Ag-Pr0.7Ca0.3MnO3 interface” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, No. 5, Aug. 4, 2003, pp. 957-959.Applicant
- Y.B. Nian, J. Strozier, N.J. Wu, X. Chen, A. Ignatiev, “Evidence for an Oxygen Diffusion Model for the Electric Pulse Induced Resistance Change Effect in Oxides” Texas Center for Advanced Materials, University of Houston (2006).Applicant
- A. Sawa, et al, “Hysteretic current-volyage characteristics and resisitance switching at a rectifying Ti/Pr0.7Ca0.3MnO3 interface” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, No. 18, Nov. 1, 2004, pp. 4073-4075.Applicant
- R. Oligschlaeger, R. Waser, R. Meyer, S. Karthäuser, R. Dittmann, “Resistive switching and data reliability of epitaxial (Ba,Sr)TiO thin films,” Applied Physics Letters, 88 (2006), 042901.Applicant
- S. Lai, T. Lowrey, “OUM—A 180 nm nonvolatile memory cell element technology for standalone and embedded applications,” IEEE International Electron Device Meeting, Technical Digest, 803 (2001).Applicant
- J. Mizusaki J, Y. Yonemura, H. Kamata, K. Ohyama, N. Mori, H. Takai, H. Tagawa, M. Dokiya, K. Naraya, T. Sasamoto, H. Inaba, T. Hashimoto, “Electronic conductivity, Seebeck coefficient, defect and electronic structure of nonstoichiometric La1-xSrxMnO3,” Solid State Ionics 132, 167 (2000).Applicant
- Zhao, Y. G. ; Rajeswari M. ; Srivastava R. C. ; Biswas A. ; Ogale S. B. ; Kang D. J. ; Prellier W. ; Zhiyun Chen ; Greene R. L. ; Venkatesan T., “Effect of oxygen content on the structural, transport, and magnetic properties of La1-deltaMn1-deltaO3 thin films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 86, No. 11, Dec. 1999, pp. 6327-6330.Applicant
- J. R. Stetter, W. R. Penrose, S. Yao, “Sensors, Chemical Sensors, Electrochemical Sensors, and ECS,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 150 (2), S11-S16 (2003).Applicant
- B. C. H. Steele, A. Heinzel, “Materials for Fuel-Cell Technologies,” Nature 414, Nov. 2001, pp. 345-352.Applicant
- A. Reller, J. M. Thomas, D. A. Jefferson, M. K. Uppal, “Superstructures Formed by the Ordering of Vacancies in a Selective Oxidation Catalyst: Grossly Defective CaMnO3,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. 394, No. 1807 Aug. 1984, pp. 223-241.Applicant
- A. J. Millis, “Cooperative Jahn-Teller effect and electron-phonon coupling in La1-xAxMnO3,” Phys. Rev. B 53, 8434-8441 (1996).Applicant
- Zhuang, W.W. et al., “Novel colossal magnetoresistive thin film nonvolatile resistance random access memory (RRAM)”; IEDM Technical Digest, IEEE, Dec. 8, 2002, pp. 193-196.Applicant