US 7,533,353 B2Grant
Electronic system for collecting and automatically populating clinical order information in an acute care setting
Issue Date:2009-05-12
•20 Claims
•8 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A graphical user interface for use on a computer coupled to an enterprise electronic medical records system for accepting order data including an order entry window corresponding to an identified order, the identified order including one or more parameters. The graphical user interface also including an expandable order editing box linked to the order entry window and responsive to identification of the order and adapted to accept an input from a user; an order parameter manager coupled to the enterprise electronic medical records system that is adapted to populate at least one of the one or more order parameters based on information associated with a patient for whom the order is being placed; and the graphical user interface adapted to display to the user the order and the at least one or more populated order parameters.
Metadata
Assignee
- Epic Systems Corporation
Inventors
- Carl D. Dvorak
- Christopher Alban
- Indu Prakash
Application Information
Application Number:US 11/286,742
Filing Date:2005-11-22
Priority Date:2000-12-22
Art Unit:2179
Classifications
IPC:
G06F3/00G06F17/30
Patent Drawings (8 sheets)
Description
Cross-Reference to Related Patent Applications
[0001] This patent is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/013,698 filed Dec. 10, 2001, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/257,971, filed Dec. 22, 2000, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates generally to health record management, and more particularly, the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for collecting and communicating clinical order information in an acute care setting.
Background of the Invention
[0003] The ability for users to place a wide variety of orders quickly and accurately is vital to the success of an electronic medical records system designed for the acute care setting. If placing electronic orders is too time consuming or involves too much repetitious entry of order parameters, the electronic health care system loses usability and accuracy, which can lower the efficiency of a healthcare enterprise and even compromise the quality of patient care.
[0004] Physicians, nurses, clerks, and ancillary staff working in acute care settings must often place a large number of complex orders at once. The care of each patient is likely to require many orders of a number of different types, including medications, blood tests, and nurse interventions. In addition, acute care workflows lead many clinicians to enter orders for multiple patients at the same time after conducting patient rounds, which further increases the need for efficient order entry.
[0005] Orders in an acute care setting frequently require the specification of complex order parameters, such as frequency, interval, count, dose, and route, that are a challenge to communicate effectively in any ordering system, even a traditional paper ordering system. A nurse intervention order may tell the nurse to check a patient's vital signs every hour for 24 hours, then to take vitals four times per day for the next two days. Or it may ask that blood levels be tested every two hours until normal levels are reached and then every four hours up to a count of eight times. Electronic ordering systems for both ambulatory and acute care settings have usually relied on the selection of an order from a database, followed by text entry of order parameters on a number of windows for each order before it is filed. In the acute care setting, such entry methods are likely to inhibit regular use of the ordering system or even any use at all, because staff find it too cumbersome to enter order parameters by hand on more than one window for every order.
[0006] While these order parameters may be very complex, the likely parameter values for a given order generally belong to a predictable set. In few cases does care require the entry of an order “from scratch” with parameters that cannot be anticipated. A physician is likely to place many orders for patient vitals with similar frequencies at similar intervals. Therefore, text entry of electronic orders not only creates a repetitious workflow that needlessly adds time to the task of order entry, but it fails to take advantage of the ease with which many parameters can be selected from a set of pre-defined common values for the order. In addition, text entry of order parameters increases the likelihood of written error or miscommunication of what are in fact routinely selected values.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0007] FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of a user interface in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention illustrating interaction of the user interface with an electronic medical records (EMR) system.
[0008] FIG. 2 is a flow chart representation of an order entry workflow in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention.
[0009] FIG. 3 is a flow chart representation of an order editing workflow in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention.
[0010] FIG. 4 is a flow chart representation of another order editing workflow in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention.
[0011] FIG. 5 is a flow chart representation of another order editing workflow in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention.
[0012] FIG. 6 is a flow chart representation of another order editing workflow in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention.
[0013] FIG. 7 is a flow chart representation of another order editing workflow in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
[0014] According to a preferred embodiment of the invention an interactive, graphical user interface presents user-specific lists of orders grouped into types. When the user clicks an order sentence corresponding to that order appears. The user then clicks on the sentence to open an expanded order editing box accompanied by a set of buttons and selection lists encompassing the parameters that must be defined for the order and the most common values for those parameters. To facilitate quick order entry, the entire order entry process can be conducted with the mouse or another pointing device, by selecting the order via a check box and specifying all parameters by clicking buttons and selection lists.
[0015] The list of orders, order parameters, and default values can be configured by the users of the enterprise employing apparatus and methods according to preferred embodiments of the invention, in order to reduce the time spent searching for options that are routinely used. Orders can also be grouped and order parameters can be populated by default information on the basis of user preference and history of care for the patient. For example, a user may create order sets containing the orders commonly placed when admitting a patient with a respiratory condition. Alternatively, if a patient has been diagnosed with a specific condition in the past, a system defined order set may appear for the user containing defaults recommended for a patient with the condition.
[0016] Order parameters include priority, frequency, dose, route, interval, start and end dates, and count, but they can be extended to include other parameters users want to define for orders. In addition, each order can be configured to contain “condition” buttons, accommodating highly complex order parameters, such as one frequency for an order lasting a specified interval, followed by a different frequency, which lasts for a successive interval. Other condition options can allow users to specify a sequence of orders or to alternate between two orders for specified intervals. As with the order parameters, the condition options are extendible to meet user needs.
[0017] As the user selects options for order parameters, the parameter values currently selected appear in a dynamically generated summary sentence at the top of the order editing box. The summary sentence serves several purposes. It clarifies the selections the user has made and shows how the order parameters will appear to the staff member who receives the order. The summary sentence also helps the user keep track of the often complex succession of intervals or conditions selected for the order, in order to reduce the potential for medical error and ensure that the order is properly specified and communicated.
[0018] In addition, a variety of decision support alerts can be associated with orders, warning users of factors in patient care that may affect the decision to place the order, such as duplicate orders for the patient or dangerous medication interactions. These decision support options can be configured to locate any important information stored in the enterprise's database repository and present it to the user when the order is selected. Thus, decision support for orders is highly configurable and can provide the user with reports containing procedure instructions, previous order values recorded for the patient, access to clinical reference and enterprise-defined procedure instructions and guidelines for the order, or any other stored information the enterprise wants to present to a user selecting the order.
[0019] The user can select as many orders as desired for the patient in one session of use from the single “Order Composer” Window provided. All editing of order parameters can be performed within an expanded order editing box, which appears for each selected order. Only one order editing box is expanded at a time, and when the user clicks another order, the current order's box collapses, saving all the current values and displaying them beside the order in the form of the summary sentence. The user can return to edit any order at any time until the orders for the session are filed. When the desired orders and parameters have been selected, all the order information assembled can be filed simultaneously with a single button click into the database and undergo order transmittal processing. This order transmittal processing can be configured to send order information in a variety of formats to a variety of destinations, including interfaces, faxes, printers, and a comprehensive messaging system that links staff mail boxes, staff worklists, networked terminals, and enterprise mail box pools.
[0020] The invention may be implemented as part of an enterprise-wide integrated electronic medical records (EMR) system that is designed to serve large-scale health care enterprises. Therefore, the invention has practical use with the extensive data repositories, network of workstation terminals, and numerous concurrent users employed by such large enterprises.
[0021] FIG. 1 represents an overview of the dynamic interaction between the structures of the invention's database repository and the features these structures support in the enterprise medical record (EMR) system 100 including an EMR graphical user interface 110. The EMR System 100 may be implemented using a suitable computing platform including processing, memory and input/output capability. The EMR system 100 may be a standalone system, may be implemented as part of a larger enterprise healthcare information management system, or as part of a network of devices providing information management services to the healthcare enterprise. The EMR System 100 may include two elements of an order composer apparatus 102 according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. These two elements are the order display engine 112 and the order parameter manager 114. The order display engine 112 and the order parameter manager 114 bring together and communicate information stored in various records of the data repository 118 that are relevant to placing clinical orders. These records include the patient record 120, the decision support settings 122, the user security record 124, the order transmittal instructions 126, the order parameters and default values 128, the user profile and preference lists 130, and the order record 132. The order display engine 112 and the order parameter manager 114 present and update the correct information to appear when a specific user employs the EMR graphical user interface 110. The order display engine 112 determines the orders that are listed for each order type based on the user profile and preference lists. It also finds the order parameters to include for each listed order and any default values. Decision support for the listed orders, such as alerts or procedure instructions are also loaded, along with the order transmittal procedures for the session of use. The order display engine 112 also consults the user security record 124 to determine whether the user can file orders or if a cosign or authorization is needed. The order parameter manager 114 stores parameters 146 as the user enters them prior to the filing of orders. These parameters 146 are used to dynamically create the summary sentence 148 for the order.
[0022] The EMR graphical user interface 110 presents the user with the order entry activity 134, which is one activity within the larger EMR system 110. The EMR graphical user interface 110 is generated by the order display engine 112, and is displayed to the user via a suitable display device or devices (not shown). The order entry activity 134 contains: an activity list bar 145 listing possible activities that may be undertaken in connection with the current patient, a patient information header 147 that displays identifying and other patient related information about the current patient and an order type navigation bar 136, displaying the list of various order types 138. When the user clicks an order type 138, the list of orders 140 belonging to that order type 138 is displayed in the order composer window 142. When a user clicks an order from the list 140, a sentence statement of the order appears. The user then clicks on the sentence to open an expanded order editing box 144 in the order composer window 142, allowing the user to define all order parameters 146 necessary for the order, as defined by the enterprise employing the invention. The user selects an order from a user-specific list causing the order sentence to appear. By clicking on the sentence, the user then causes the expanded order editing box 144 to appear. Decision support information 122, such as procedure instructions, order alternatives, and formulary options alert the user to import information when the order is selected. When the user has selected all desired orders and parameters, a single button click files the order information assembled in the order composer window 142. The order parameters 146 the user selects for the order appear in the dynamically generated summary sentence 148 at the top of the order editing box 144. All selected orders can be filed simultaneously by clicking the file orders button (not depicted) in the order entry activity toolbar 150.
[0023] FIG. 2 depicts an order entry workflow 200 in which a user logs into the EMR system 100 supporting the order composer 102, selects three orders of different order types and files them simultaneously. From the start 202, to open the order composer 102, the user must enter a valid login and password 204, and at 206, the EMR system 100 determines the authorized activities for the user and displays options in the activity tool bar 150. The EMR system 100 must also recognize the user as authorized to place electronic orders 208 and 210. Once the user opens 212 the order entry activity 134, the order entry activity 134 displays 214 the available order types 138 to the user in the order type navigation bar 136. Order types can follow clinical categories, but they can also represent order sets based on user preference or enterprise guidelines. As illustrated in FIG. 2 , the user proceeds 216 to select Order Type A from the order type navigation bar 136. The user profile engine 130 then determines 218 what orders of Type A appear for the current user. When the user selects 220 the desired order from the Type A list and clicks on the displayed order sentence, two things happen. First, any decision support alerts 122 relevant to the order or its interaction with patient data are triggered and presented 220 to the user. Second, the expanded order editing box 144 appears 224 in the same window in which the order list was displayed, and decision support alerts may also appear in the expanded order editing box 144. Here, the user edits all parameters 146 for the order. The user repeats for Order Type B (228-238) and Order Type C (240-250) the process of selecting an order type and selecting and editing an order. There could be as many more order types to choose from as the enterprise provides and the user creates. Enterprises can add new order types containing any set of orders at any time, and users can define order types that appear only when they use the order entry activity 134. After selecting all desired orders, the user clicks 252 the file orders button and simultaneously files all selected orders, sending them through enterprise-defined order transmittal processes 254.
[0024] FIG. 3 shows the process 300 of editing 226 a sample Vitals order, which in this scenario was listed in Order Type A selected at step 224 of FIG. 2 . The parameters 146 the user sets for the Vitals order are priority 302, interval 304, and count 306. For each parameter, the user can click a pre-defined button, e.g., 308-312 for priority, 318-324 for interval and 330-334 for count, to select a common value for the parameter. In the example illustrated in FIG. 3 , the user selects 314, 326 and 336, respectively a High priority 308, a Q4 interval 318, and a count of 4 330. When appropriate, the user can also choose from the more extensive selection list options provided for the interval and count parameters, e.g., buttons 324 and 334. Each time the user sets a value for a parameter. 146, the value appears, 316, 328 and 338, in text form as part of the summary sentence 148 at the top of the order editing box 144. The user can change the value selected for a parameter 146 as many times as desired. When the user is done editing the order, the user clicks 340 on the next order to be edited, causing the Vitals order's editing box to collapse 342 and the next order sentence to appear. Clicking on the order sentence causes the editing box for the next order to expand. The parameter values set for the Vitals order appear in the form of the summary sentence 148 next to the order where it appears in the list of Type A orders.
[0025] FIG. 4 shows the process 400 of editing 238 a sample Medication order, which in this scenario was listed in Order Type B 236. The parameters 146 the user sets are dose 402, route 404, and frequency 406. For each parameter 146, the user can click a pre-defined button, e.g., 408-412 for dose, 418-424 for route and 430-436 for frequency, to select a common value. In the example illustrated in FIG. 4 , the user selects 414, 426 and 438, respectively 500 mg for the dose 408, a route of IV 424, and a frequency of BID (meaning twice per day) 432. The user can also choose from the more extensive selection list options, e.g., buttons 412 and 436, provided for the dose and frequency parameters. Each time the user sets a value for a parameter 146, the value appears, 416, 428 and 440, in text form as part of the summary sentence 148 at the top of the order editing box 144. The user can change the value selected for a parameter as many times as desired. When the user is done editing the order, the user clicks 442 on the next order to be edited, causing the Medication order's editing box to collapse 444 and the order sentence for the next order to appear. Clicking on the order sentence causes the editing box for the next order to expand. The parameter values set for the Medication order appear in the form of the summary sentence 148 next to the order where it appears in the list of Type B orders.
[0026] FIG. 5 shows a process 500 for editing 238 another sample Medication order from Order Type B, immediately after editing the Medication order in FIG. 4 . The parameters 146 the user sets are dose 502 and condition 504. For each parameter 146, the user can click a pre-defined button, e.g., 506-512 for dose and 518-522 for condition, to select a common value. In the example illustrated in FIG. 5 , the user selects 514 and 524, respectively 250 mg for the dose 506 and an If condition 518. The user can also select an option from the more extensive selection list options 512 provided for the dose parameter. When the user selects 524, 528 or 532 a condition 504, the user can choose from an additional selection list of pre-defined text options 526, 530 and 534, respectively in order to complete a sentence explaining the circumstances under which the order should be administered or discontinued. This condition 504 appears 536 along with the other parameter values 516 set for the order in the summary sentence 148 at the top of the order editing box 144. For example, if the user clicks the If condition 518 and chooses patient experiences headache from the selection list 526, the summary sentence 148 would read If patient experiences headache, 500 mg Medication. The user can change the value selected for a parameter 146 as many times as desired. When the user is done editing the order, the user clicks 538 on the next order to be edited, causing the Medication order's editing box to collapse 540 and the order sentence for the next order to appear. Clicking on the order sentence causes the editing box for the next order to expand. The parameter values set for the Medication order appear in the form of the summary sentence 148 next to the order where it appears in the list of Type B orders.
[0027] FIG. 6 shows the process 600 of editing a sample X-Ray order, which in this scenario was listed in Order Type C. The parameters 146 the user sets are when 602 and condition 604. For each parameter, the user can click a pre-defined button, e.g., 606-610 for when and 616-618 for condition. In the example illustrated in FIG. 6 , the user selects 612 and 620, respectively Today AM for when 606 and a Before condition 616. The user can also choose from the more extensive selection list options 610 provided for the when parameter. Once the user selects a condition 604, the user can choose 622 and 626 from an additional selection list of pre-defined text options in order to complete a summary sentence 148 explaining the sequence in which orders should be administered. This condition 604 appears 614 and 628 along with the other parameter values set for the order in the summary sentence 148 at the top of the order editing box 144. For example, if the user clicks the Before condition button and chooses other orders from the selection list, the summary sentence would read X-Ray before other orders. The user can change the value selected for a parameter 146 as many times as desired. When the user is done editing the order, the user can click 630 on the next order to be edited, causing the X-Ray order's editing box to collapse 632 and the next order sentence to appear. Clicking on the order sentence causes the editing box for the next order to expand. The parameter values set for the X-Ray order appear in the form of the summary sentence (not depicted) next to the order where it appears in the list of Type C orders.
[0028] FIG. 7 exhibits the variety of decision support alerts 222, 234 and 246 that may be triggered when a user selects an order to edit. The decision support alerts may be displayed directly within the order editing box, or the decision support alerts may be displayed at an appropriate location with the EMR graphic user interface 110. Any, all, or none of the alerts shown may appear when a user selects the order, depending on how the enterprise employing the invention has configured the decision support settings 122 and the order record 132. Alerts warnings state to the user the type of alert that has been triggered 702-714 and provide access 716-726 to a report or other enterprise-defined information detailing the reason for the alert and/or suggesting alternative orders. There are six alerts depicted as primary examples:
-
- [0029] procedure instructions provide a link to special instructions the enterprise wants a user placing the order to see, 702.
- [0030] medication interactions alert the ordering user that the medication order selected may interact dangerously with another medication ordered for the patient or with one of the patient's recorded allergies, 704.
- [0031] The previous questions warning presents a report to the user displaying previous results the patient has received for the same order, 708.
- [0032] The duplicate check warns the user if the same order has been placed for the patient within a facility-defined time interval, e.g. 24 hours, indicating that it may be a duplication of the same order, 710.
- [0033] The required orders alert informs the user that there are questions that must be answered about the order before it can be placed. The user can click a button to view and edit the questions, 712.
- [0034] The clinical reference and guidelines alert the user that the order may be part of an enterprise protocol that provides specific instructions on a treatment program or that the order is counter-indicated by enterprise protocols. The user can view the guidelines or reference in order to decide whether the order should be placed, 714.
[0035] These decision support options can be configured to locate any important information the enterprise employing the invention has stored in its database repository and present it to the user when the order is selected. The user may determine whether the order is to be placed 728, and if so continue editing the selected order 730 or if not select a different order 732.
[0036] The invention has been described in terms of several preferred embodiments. It will be appreciated that the invention may otherwise be embodied without departing from the fair scope of the invention defined by the following claims
Claims
We claim:
1. A computer having a graphical user interface, the computer coupled to an enterprise electronic medical records system for accepting order data, the graphical user interface comprising:
an order entry window corresponding to an identified order, the identified order including one or more parameters;
an expandable order editing box linked to the order entry window;
the expandable order editing box responsive to identification of the order and adapted to accept an input from a user; and
an order parameter manager coupled to the enterprise electronic medical records system, the order parameter manager populating at least one of the one or more order parameters based on information associated with a patient for whom the order is being placed; and the graphical user interface displaying to the user the order and the at least one or more populated order parameters.
2. The graphical user interface of claim 1, wherein the order parameter manager is adapted to retrieve the information associated with the patient from a record stored within the enterprise electronic medical records system, the record being at least one of a patient record, a user profile, or a preference list.
3. The graphical user interface of claim 2, wherein the information associated with the patient is retrieved from the patient record, and wherein the at least one of the one or more order parameters is associated with at least one of lab information, medication information, vitals, allergy information, procedure information, test information, or a previous order value.
4. The graphical user interface of claim 2, wherein the at least one of the one or more order parameters retrieved is used to replace a default parameter value.
5. The graphical user interface of claim 1, wherein the order parameter manager is further adapted to populate the at least one of the one or more order parameters based on the patient's history of care.
6. The graphical user interface of claim 1, further comprising an order data summary linked to the expandable order editing box, the order data summary responsive to the identified order.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the order data summary includes additional information contained within at least one of a patient record, allergy information, lab information, an order record, a user record, a department record, a facility record, or a system record.
8. The graphical user interface of claim 1, further comprising an order type navigation bar, wherein an order type is selectable from the order type navigation bar.
9. The graphical user interface of claim 1, further comprising a decision support manager adapted to generate an alert, the alert associated with data stored in the electronic medical records system to aid a user in an order selection process.
10. A method of entering order information in a health care setting, the method comprising:
providing within a graphical user interface an ability to accept an input from a user identifying a particular clinical order from a plurality of possible clinical orders;
identifying a plurality of order parameters associated with the particular clinical order;
populating at least one of the plurality of order parameters based on information associated with a patient for whom the clinical order is being placed, the information associated with the patient being stored in a record in a database, the record being at least one of a patient record, a user profile, or a preference list; and
displaying the at least one of the plurality of order parameters associated with the selected clinical order within a display window of the graphical user interface, the display window including an order editing box that is responsive to the identified particular clinical order.
11. The method of claim 10, further comprising populating the at least one of the plurality of order parameters based on one of lab information, medication information, vitals, allergy information, procedure information, test information, or a previous order value.
12. The method of claim 10, further comprising dynamically displaying an order data summary within the display window that is responsive to the identified particular clinical order.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the order data summary includes additional information contained within at least one of a patient record, allergy information, lab information, an order record, a user record, a department record, a facility record, or a system record.
14. The method of claim 10, further comprising generating a user configurable order type navigation bar listing a plurality of order types.
15. The method of claim 10, further comprising generating an alert, the alert associated with data stored in the database to aid a user in an order selection process.
16. A dynamic order composer device, the order composer device being coupled to and operating in conjunction with an integrated medical record system, the order composer device comprising:
means to identify one or more orders, the orders identified based on data stored in a database repository, the database repository being part of the integrated medical record system;
means to identify and retrieve from the database repository one or more values for order parameters associated with each of the one or more orders, wherein the one or more values are associated with a patient for whom the one or more orders are being placed; means to populate at least one of the order parameters associated with each of the one or more orders based on at least one of the one or more values; and
means to display the order identified by the user and the one or more populated order parameters associated with each of the one or more orders.
17. The dynamic order composer device of claim 16, further comprising means to provide a user with the ability to use another user's default values.
18. The dynamic order composer device of claim 16, further comprising means to generate a dynamic order data summary that is responsive to the identified order.
19. The dynamic order composer device of claim 16, further comprising means to generate an alert, the alert associated with data stored in the integrated medical record system to aid a user in an order selection process.
20. The dynamic order composer device of claim 19, further comprising means to generate a second alert, the second alert associated with patient record data to indicate a specified order is specifically indicated or counter-indicated for a patient.
Patent Citations (115)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4591974(A) | 1986-05-01 | Dornbush et al. | Applicant |
| US4667292(A) | 1987-05-01 | Mohlenbrock et al. | Applicant |
| US4839806(A) | 1989-06-01 | Goldfischer et al. | Applicant |
| US4893270(A) | 1990-01-01 | Beck et al. | Applicant |
| US4937743(A) | 1990-06-01 | Rassman et al. | Applicant |
| US4962475(A) | 1990-10-01 | Hernandez et al. | Applicant |
| US5072383(A) | 1991-12-01 | Brimm et al. | Applicant |
| US5072412(A) | 1991-12-01 | Henderson, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5072838(A) | 1991-12-01 | Price, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5077666(A) | 1991-12-01 | Brimm et al. | Applicant |
| US5088981(A) | 1992-02-01 | Howson et al. | Applicant |
| US5101476(A) | 1992-03-01 | Kukla | Applicant |
| US5253362(A) | 1993-10-01 | Nolan et al. | Applicant |
| US5301105(A) | 1994-04-01 | Cummings, Jr. | Applicant |
| US5319543(A) | 1994-06-01 | Wilhelm | Applicant |
| US5325478(A) | 1994-06-01 | Shelton et al. | Applicant |
| US5361202(A) | 1994-11-01 | Doue | Applicant |
| US5428778(A) | 1995-06-01 | Brookes | Applicant |
| US5471382(A) | 1995-11-01 | Tallman et al. | Applicant |
| US5546580(A) | 1996-08-01 | Seliger et al. | Applicant |
| US5557515(A) | 1996-09-01 | Abbruzzese et al. | Applicant |
| US5574828(A) | 1996-11-01 | Hayward et al. | Applicant |
| US5596752(A) | 1997-01-01 | Knudsen et al. | Applicant |
| US5603026(A) | 1997-02-01 | Demers et al. | Applicant |
| US5666492(A) | 1997-09-01 | Rhodes et al. | Applicant |
| US5692125(A) | 1997-11-01 | Schloss et al. | Applicant |
| US5724584(A) | 1998-03-01 | Peters et al. | Applicant |
| US5740800(A) | 1998-04-01 | Hendrickson et al. | Applicant |
| US5748907(A) | 1998-05-01 | Crane | Applicant |
| US5751958(A) | 1998-05-01 | Zweben et al. | Applicant |
| US5758095(A) | 1998-05-01 | Albaum et al. | Applicant |
| US5760704(A) | 1998-06-01 | Barton et al. | Applicant |
| US5772585(A) | 1998-06-01 | Lavin et al. | Applicant |
| US5778346(A) | 1998-07-01 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | Applicant |
| US5781442(A) | 1998-07-01 | Engleson et al. | Applicant |
| US5781890(A) | 1998-07-01 | Nematbakhsh et al. | Applicant |
| US5802253(A) | 1998-09-01 | Gross et al. | Applicant |
| US5823948(A) | 1998-10-01 | Ross, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5832450(A) | 1998-11-01 | Myers et al. | Applicant |
| US5833599(A) | 1998-11-01 | Schrier et al. | Applicant |
| US5838313(A) | 1998-11-01 | Hou et al. | Applicant |
| US5842976(A) | 1998-12-01 | Williamson | Applicant |
| US5845253(A) | 1998-12-01 | Rensimer et al. | Applicant |
| US5845255(A) | 1998-12-01 | Mayaud | Applicant |
| US5848393(A) | 1998-12-01 | Goodridge et al. | Applicant |
| US5848395(A) | 1998-12-01 | Edgar et al. | Applicant |
| US5850221(A) | 1998-12-01 | Macrae et al. | Applicant |
| US5867688(A) | 1999-02-01 | Simmon et al. | Applicant |
| US5867821(A) | 1999-02-01 | Ballantyne et al. | Applicant |
| US5899998(A) | 1999-05-01 | McGauley et al. | Applicant |
| US5915240(A) | 1999-06-01 | Karpf | Applicant |
| US5929851(A) | 1999-07-01 | Donnelly | Applicant |
| US5946659(A) | 1999-08-01 | Lancelot et al. | Examiner |
| US5950168(A) | 1999-09-01 | Simborg et al. | Applicant |
| US5960406(A) | 1999-09-01 | Rasansky et al. | Applicant |
| US5974389(A) | 1999-10-01 | Clark et al. | Applicant |
| US5983210(A) | 1999-11-01 | Imasaki et al. | Applicant |
| US5997476(A) | 1999-12-01 | Brown | Applicant |
| US5999916(A) | 1999-12-01 | Peters et al. | Applicant |
| US6014631(A) | 2000-01-01 | Teagarden et al. | Applicant |
| US6016477(A) | 2000-01-01 | Ehnebuske et al. | Applicant |
| US6021404(A) | 2000-02-01 | Moukheibir | Applicant |
| US6029138(A) | 2000-02-01 | Khorasani et al. | Applicant |
| US6037940(A) | 2000-03-01 | Schroeder et al. | Applicant |
| US6047259(A) | 2000-04-01 | Campbell et al. | Applicant |
| US6063026(A) | 2000-05-01 | Schauss et al. | Applicant |
| US6067523(A) | 2000-05-01 | Bair et al. | Applicant |
| US6081786(A) | 2000-06-01 | Barry et al. | Applicant |
| US6082776(A) | 2000-07-01 | Feinberg | Applicant |
| US6139494(A) | 2000-10-01 | Cairnes | Applicant |
| US6154726(A) | 2000-11-01 | Rensimer et al. | Applicant |
| US6182047(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Dirbas | Applicant |
| US6188988(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Barry et al. | Applicant |
| US6263330(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Bessette | Applicant |
| US6266675(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Evans et al. | Applicant |
| US6275150(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Mandler et al. | Applicant |
| US6279033(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Selvarajan et al. | Applicant |
| US6283761(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Joao | Applicant |
| US6289368(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Dentler et al. | Applicant |
| US6304905(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Clark | Applicant |
| US6317719(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Schrier et al. | Applicant |
| US6332167(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Peters et al. | Applicant |
| US6345260(B1) | 2002-02-01 | Cummings, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US6401072(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Haudenschild et al. | Applicant |
| US6415275(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Zahn | Applicant |
| US6516324(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US6522875(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Dowling et al. | Applicant |
| US6757898(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Ilsen et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0016056(A1) | 2001-08-01 | Westphal et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0016853(A1) | 2001-08-01 | Kucala | Applicant |
| US2001/0049610(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Hazumi | Applicant |
| US2001/0051888(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Mayhak, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0056433(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Adelson et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0001375(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Alcott et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0001387(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Dillon | Applicant |
| US2002/0002473(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Schrier et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0002535(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Kitchen et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0007287(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Straube et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0062229(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Alban et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0188478(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Breeland et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0061072(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Baker et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0110059(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Janas, III et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0200726(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Rast | Applicant |
| US2004/0034833(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Kougiouris et al. | Applicant |
| WO-96/13790(A1) | 1996-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-96/27163 | 1996-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-98/13783 | 1998-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-99/22330(A1) | 1999-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-99/41682(A2) | 1999-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-99/44162 | 1999-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-99/63473 | 1999-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-00/28460 | 2000-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-00/29983 | 2000-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-00/65522(A2) | 2000-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO-02/29664(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (63)
- IBM Research Disclosure, “Comprehensively managed user workspace,” IBM, vol. 42, No. 421, May 1, 1999, 5 pages.Applicant
- Bakman et al., Enhancing a WIMP based interference with Speech, Gaze tracking and Agents, 4 pages.Applicant
- CPRS GUI, CPRS V 1.0 Clinician Guide, Apr. 26, 1999, 36 pages.Applicant
- Kennedy Health, http://thunder/idxweb/idxps/patientservices.asp, 1999, 10 pages.Applicant
- Miller, “Towards MedicaLogic.com, An Internet Strategy,” MedicLogic, May 1999, 7 pages.Applicant
- INHS/IRM-Inland Northwest Health Services, Mar. 2, 1999, 7 pages.Applicant
- “Integrate About My Health Into Your Practice,” MedicaLogic/Medscape, Inc., 2001, 5 pages.Applicant
- Aboutmyhealth.net, website, Aug. 10, 1999, 27 pages.Applicant
- Woody, “Why Your Medical File Belongs Online,” PCWorld.com, Jul. 23, 1999, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Integrate 98point6 Into Your Practice,” MediaLogic, Inc., 2000, 16 pages.Applicant
- Streveler, “eHealthcare is Reconnecting the Healthcare Industry,” Mar. 20, 2000, 35 pages.Applicant
- Leavitt, “MedicaLogic.com: @ the point of Care,” Presentation, 1999, 7 pages.Applicant
- “Moving Healthcare to the Web,” The ChannelHealth, Dec. 9, 1999, 46 pages.Applicant
- “IDX and ChannelHealth—The Competition,” May 15, 2000, 27 pages.Applicant
- Gray, “PING—The Personal Internetworked Notary and Guardian,” Children's Hospital Informatics Program, http://www.chip.org/research/ping.htm, Nov. 9, 2001, 17 pages.Applicant
- Fletcher, “Current issues in confidentiality: Computerized information systems, medical records, and patient rights,” ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, vol. 16, Issue 2-3, Summer/Fall 1986, pp. 8-18.Applicant
- “Sunrise Knowledge-Based Orders,” Advanced Clinical Solutions, Eclipsys, www.eclipsys.com, Dec. 2002, 4 pages.Applicant
- “Sunrise Clinical Manager,” Advanced Clinical Solutions, Eclipsys, www.eclipsys.com, Dec. 2002, 4 pages.Applicant
- “News & events,” Eclipsys, www.eclipsys.com, Apr. 16, 2002, 3 pages.Applicant
- “Horizon Clinicals,” McKesson Corporation, www.mckesson.com, 2003, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Acute Care EMR—Solutions,” Cerner Corporation, www.cerner.com, 2002-2003, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Autonomy Update™”, Product Brief, Autonomy Inc., www.autonomy.com, Mar. 2003, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Brio.Portal”, Sun Solutions Catalog, Sun Microsystems, www.sun.com, 1994-2002, 1 page.Applicant
- “Portal-in-a-Box™,” Product Brief, Autonomy Inc., www.automony.com, Apr. 2002, 6 pages.Applicant
- “Actuate Software,” Sun Solutions Catalog, Actuate Corporation & Sun Microsystems, www.sun.com, 2002, 24 pages.Applicant
- Mercando, “Appointment Scheduling on Computer”, Pace, vol. 20, Jul. 1997, pp. 1860-1862.Applicant
- “Foundation,” IDX Systems Corporation, www.idx.com, 1999-2004, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Supporting the Work of Clinicians,” IDX Systems Corporation, www.idx.com, 1999-2004, 1 page.Applicant
- McDonald et al., “The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 54, 1999, pp. 225-253.Applicant
- “CDR-Web,” Reliance Software Systems, Website, 2000, 1 page.Applicant
- Marietti, “O'Pioneers!,” Healthcare Informatics, Website, May 1999, 9 pages.Applicant
- Johnson, “Today's CDRs: The Elusive Complete Solution,” Healthcare Informatics, (Website), Jul. 1997, 7 pages.Applicant
- Andrew et al., “Computer-Based Patient Records—Venturing Off the Beaten Path: It's Time to Blaze New CPR Trails,” Healthcare Informatics, (Website), May 1997, 17 pages.Applicant
- “EMR Features,” Care Is #1, 1999-2000, 1 page.Applicant
- “Enterprise Systems Management,” Cerner Corporation, www.cerner.com, Sep. 13, 2001, 5 pages.Applicant
- “HealthMatics™ Office”, Healthmatics Office, Website, 3 pages, (date unknown).Applicant
- Clinicomp, Intl., Website, 1999-2000, 1 page.Applicant
- “ExcelCare Windows”, Website, 2 pages (date unknown).Applicant
- “IC-Chart Information”, Integreat, Website, 1 page, (date unknown).Applicant
- “Managing mail messages with rules,” Microsoft Outlook Help Manual, Website, Version 6, 5 pages Jun. 24, 2002.Applicant
- EncounterPRO, the Workflow Enabled CPR/EMR from JMJ Technologies, JMJ Technologies, Inc., www.jmjtech.com, Nov. 8, 2002, 6 pages.Applicant
- “Expeditor Systems—The Patient Flow Systems Experts”, Expeditor Systems, www.expeditor.com, 2001, 3 pages.Applicant
- “Working with Patient Lists,” EpicCare Inpatient Electronic Medical Record Jul. 2000 User's Guide, Epic Systems Corp., Section 10.5-10.6, 3 pages.Applicant
- “Patient Lists,” EpicCare Inpatient Electronic Medical Record Jul. 2000 User's Guide, Epic Systems Corp., Section 11.3-11.4, 3 pages.Applicant
- “Oacis—Census Management,” DINMAR (U.S.) Inc., www.oacis.com, 2002, 2 pages.Applicant
- Grimson et al., “Interoperability Issues in Sharing Electronic Healthcare Records—the Synapses Approach,” IEEE, 1997, pp. 180-185.Applicant
- “Clinician Documentation with EMR,” Clinicomp, Intl., www.clinicomp.com, 1999-2002, 1 page.Applicant
- “Essentris™ CPOE”, Clinicomp, Intl., www.clinicomp.com, 1999-2002, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Essentris™ GDR,” Clinicomp, Intl., www.clinicomp.com, 1999-2002, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Intensivist Tools,” Clinicomp, Intl., www.clinicomp.com, 1999-2002, 2 pages.Applicant
- “CMRxp—Computerized Medical Records Powered by Experience!!,” Electronic Medical Records (EMR)xp Experience, Chartcare, Inc., www.chartcare.com, Mar. 5, 2003, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Dr-InBasket-Lab Results, Messaging and To-Do's,” Chartcare, Inc., www.chartcare.com, Mar. 5, 2003, 3 pages.Applicant
- “PatInfo-Patient Information Handouts,” PatInfo-Patient Demographics Software, Chartcare, Inc., www.chartcare.com, Mar. 5, 2003, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Recall-Patient Health Maintenance,” Chartcare, Inc., www.chartcare.com, Mar. 5, 2003, 3 pages.Applicant
- “LabTrack-Lab Ordering & Results Tracking,” LabTrack-Lab Result Tracking Software, Chartcare, Inc., www.chartcare.com, Mar. 5, 2003, 3 pages.Applicant
- “Rx-MedTrack-Prescription Writing/Medication Tracking,” Rx-MedTrack-Prescription Writing Software, Chartcare, Inc., www.chartcare.com, Mar. 5, 2003, 2 pages.Applicant
- “The Right Tools,” Product Description, Integreat Inc., www.igreat.com, 2003, 1 page.Applicant
- “IC-Chart Additional Modules,” Integreat Inc., www.igreat.com, 2003, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Services,” Integreat Inc., www.igreat.com, 2003, 2 pages.Applicant
- Egan et al., “Computers and Networks in Medical and Healthcare Systems,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 25, No. 3, 1995, pp. 355-365.Applicant
- Van De Velde, “Framework for a Clinical Information System,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 57, 2000, pp. 57-72.Applicant
- Fabbretti et al., “Applying the Object Paradigm to a Centralized Database for a Cardiology Division,” International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, vol. 42, 1996, pp. 129-134.Applicant
- Plaisant et al., “An Information Architecture to Support the Visualization of Personal Histories,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 34, No. 5, 1998, pp. 581-597.Applicant