US 7,528,232 B2Grant

Utility of phylloplanins as antibiotics, selective fungicides and for enhancing microbial resistance in crop plants

Issue Date:2009-05-05

•6 Claims

•10 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

The invention is directed to methods and compositions that inhibit pathogen proliferation. More particularly, these methods and compositions involve the use of phylloplane proteins as antibiotics against human and animal pathogens.

Metadata

Assignee

The University of Kentucky Research Foundation

Inventors

George J. Wagner
Ryan W. Shepherd

Application Information

Application Number:US 11/304,528

Filing Date:2005-12-15

Priority Date:2005-05-20

Art Unit:1656

Classifications

IPC:

A61K38/00C07K14/00

Patent Drawings (10 sheets)

Description

Cross-Reference to Related Applications

[0001] This patent application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/682,814, filed May 20, 2005, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

Statement Regarding Federally Sponsored Research

[0002] The invention was supported by Grant 5-41170 from the Kentucky Tobacco Research And Development Center, and therefore the government may have rights in the invention.

Technical Field

[0003] Methods of producing and using compositions useful as antimicrobial agents are provided. More particularly, these compositions involve the use of phylloplanin proteins.

Background

[0004] The need for discovery of new anti-fungal and anti-bacterial agents for use in preventing human and animal disease is growing because resistance to existing antibiotics is increasing. In agriculture, available approaches for preventing crop loss due to particularly fungal diseases are inadequate in many cases. Oomycete fungi are significant causes of disease in many plant crops, including tobacco, and it is important that we explore alternate approaches to microbial disease control in plants effected by these fungi. In 1979, an epidemic of blue mold (caused by the oomycete Peronospora tabacina) caused an estimated $ 1.1 billion loss of tobacco crops in Ontario. In the future, outbreaks such as this may be just as damaging to tobacco grown for molecular farming purposes as for conventional tobacco production.

Summary

[0005] The invention relates to an isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising the polynucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 17 or a homolog thereof with >80% identity. The invention further relates to a polypeptide encoded by the polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 17 or a homolog thereof with >80% identity, such as SEQ ID NO:18 which is a disease- or pest-resistance conferring protein, more specifically a phylloplanin protein. The invention further relates to a method of inhibiting microbial proliferation in or on a plant comprising overexpression of phylloplanin genes in the plant, or contacting an infected plant with a phylloplanin protein.

[0006] The invention further provides a novel promoter sequence that is useful for expression of a protein of interest. In accordance with the invention, a nucleic acid construct is provided comprising a non-coding regulatory domain isolated upstream from a Phylloplanin gene, wherein said non-coding regulatory domain is operably associated with a nucleic acid which expresses a protein of interest, wherein said nucleic acid is heterologous to said non-coding domain, and wherein the non-coding regulatory domain comprises a sequence at least 80% identical to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:34. The construct comprises a transcriptional and translational initiation region and translational termination region functional in plants.

[0007] The invention further relates to plants selected from the group consisting of corn, soybean, tobacco, potato, tomato, pepper, datura, alfalfa, cucumber, and medicago, genetically modified by a polynucleotide of the invention.

[0008] The invention further relates to a method of inhibiting microbial proliferation in an organism comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a phylloplanin polypeptide.

[0009] The invention further relates to a method of screening endogenous proteins having antimicrobial properties on a plant leaf surface comprising a) washing the plant leaf surface with an aqueous solution; b) collecting the aqueous solution after washing; and c) analyzing the solution for proteins having antimicrobial properties.

[0010] The invention further relates to methods of screening endogenous proteins from plants obtained from a plant of a species selected from the group consisting of Medicago sp., Trifolium sp., Ulmus sp., Pyrus malus, Prunus armeniaca, Cynara acolymus, Asparagus officinale, Hordeum sp., Galium sp., Beta vulgaris, Prunus serotina, Vigna sinensis, Nyssa sylvatica, Quercus sp., Artocarpus altilis, Brassica sp., Andropogon scoparius, Fagopyrum sagittatum, Manihot esculenta, Apium graveolens, Agropyron desertorum, Cornus florida, Phaseolus sp., Triticum sp., Oenothera caespitosa, Carya sp., Lactuca sp., Impatiens sp., Helianthus sp., Ledum decumbens, Astragalus pattersoni, Setaria italica, Vaccinium mytrillus, Avena sativa, Petroselinum crispum, Pastinaca sativa, Pisum sp., Prunus sp., Pyrus communis, Musa paradisiaca, Astragalus preussii, Raphanus sativus, Secalse cereale, Sassafras albidum, Atriplex confertifolia, Tillandsia usneoides, Spinacia oleracea, Liquidambar styraciflua, Linaria triphylla, Liriodendron tulipfera, Vicia sp., Citrullus vulgaris, Melilotus sp., Salix sp., Rhus copallina, Nicotiana sp., Vitis sp., Datura sp., Medicago sp., Lycopersicon sp., Solanum sp., Capsicum sp., Cucumis sp., Fragaria sp., Petunia sp., Geranium sp., Coleus sp., Stevia sp., Oryza sp., Nepeta sp., Zea mays, Glycine max.

[0011] The invention provides phylloplanin proteins, methods and compositions, as an avenue for enhancing fungal resistance in plants, using tobacco and blue mold as the model. In addition, the invention demonstrates that phylloplanin is an antimicrobial protein useful in molecular farming products. Plant phylloplanins have the potential to be used as antibiotics against human and animal microorganisms. Overexpression of phylloplanin genes in crop plants such as corn, soybean, tobacco, tomato, potato, pepper, datura, alfalfa, cucumber, medicago and the like enhances crop resistance to fungal and bacterial microorganisms. In addition, phylloplanins can be used as a topical fungicide.

[0012] Other aspects of the invention are described throughout the specification.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0013] FIGS. 1A-C depicts data demonstrating proteins present on plant leaf surfaces. A: 40× magnification of TI 1068 phylloplane with tall glandular secreting trichomes (TGSTs) and short glandular trichome (SGTs) identified. B: Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE of TI 1068-derived samples. Phylloplanins I-IV are identified. Loaded volumes of LWW (B,d) and sterile-grown plant LWW (B,e) represent 25 cm²leaf surface area. Mwt (B,a) denotes protein standards. C: Silver-stained SDS-PAGE of LWWs from field-grown TI 1068 (C,b; 10 cm²), G. max (C,c; 30 cm²), and H. annuus (C,d; 6 cm²). Mwt (C,a) denotes protein standards.

[0014] FIGS. 2A-B depicts proteins in TI 1068 LWW that inhibit P. tabacina spore germination and leaf infection. A: P. tabacina spore germination assays (Pt), Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE (sds), and western blots with 1:10,000 phylloplanin antiserum (w). a, water+spores. b, TI 1068 LWW (diluted to 100 ng/μL total protein)+spores. c, TI 1068 LWW (100 ng/μL total protein) digested with Proteinase K (ProtK)+spores. Arrow marks residual, soluble ProtK. B: P. tabacina leaf infection assay of Petite Havana. a, water+spores (10⁴spores/mL). A sporulating lesion is indicated with arrow. b, TI 1068 LWW (diluted to 50 ng/μL)+spores (10⁴spores/mL).

[0015] FIG. 3 provides a nucleotide (SEQ ID NO: 17) and predicted amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO:18) of TI 1068 Phylloplanin. Nucleotides are numbered on right. Start and stop codons are underlined, and the signal sequence is bold-faced. Segments corresponding to peptides amino acid-N1, amino acid-T1, amino acid-T2, amino acid-T3, amino acid-T4, and amino acid-P1 are marked by lines above the amino acid sequence and labelled.

[0016] FIGS. 4A-D depicts E. coli-expressed TI 1068 phylloplanin inhibits P. tabacina spore germination. Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE (sds), western blots with 1:10,000 phylloplanin antiserum (w), and P. tabacina spore germination assays (Pt). a: E. coli expressed MBP-PhyllP (M-P; 160 ng/μL total protein) treated with Factor-Xa. Arrow indicates released PhyllP. b: E. coli expressed MBP-PhyllP (160 ng/μL total protein) treated with Factor-Xa and Proteinase-K (ProtK). Volume used was equivalent to (a). c: E. coli expressed MBP (M; 200 ng/μL total protein treated with Factor-Xa. d: E. coli expressed MBP (200 ng/μL, total protein) treated with Factor-Xa and ProtK Volume used was equivalent to (c).

[0017] FIGS. 5A-C shows that the phylloplanin promoter directs protein expression in short glandular trichomes (SGTs). A: Magnification of X-gluc stained plantlet leaf from TI 1068 with GUS under control of phylloplanin promoter. Tall glandular secreting trichomes (TSGTs) are also indicated. B: X-gluc stained SGT on TI 1068 plantlet expressing GUS under control of phylloplanin promoter. Surface structures are indicated. C: Fluorescent magnification/detection of TI 1068 plantlet with GFP under control of phylloplanin promoter. GFP was present only in SGT gland cells. The yellow arrows indicate constrictions between gland cells that may be “pores” to release protein to the leaf surface.

[0018] FIG. 6 depicts growth curves of E. coli BL21 cultures expressing N. tabacum PR-5a and A. thaliana AAP75801 with the pET-30 system. Induction with IPTG, if performed, occurred at 2.25 hrs. The IPTG-induced PR-5a expressing culture continued logarithmic growth along with control BL21 cells and non-IPTG-induced cultures. The IPTG-induced AAP75801 expressing culture seemed to stop growing. This suggests that the induced AAP75801 protein product was toxic towards the culture.

[0019] FIG. 7 depicts inhibition of P. tabacina Spore Germination and Leaf Infection by T-Phylloplanins in LWW. For both assays, the results of a single experiment that is representative of three separate experiments are shown. Open circles, spore germination; closed squares, leaf infection.

[0020] FIGS. 8A-B depicts multiple alignment and phylogenetic analysis of T-phylloplanin and similar sequences in other plants (SEQ ID NOs: 18 and 36-48, respectively). A: The amino acid sequence of T-phylloplanin was aligned against sequences giving significant BLAST similarity scores using the ClustalW algorithm of DNASTAR (Lasergene Software, Madison, Wis.). Amino acids conserved between any six sequences are indicated in reverse contrast. B: Unrooted phylogenetic tree showing the evolutionary relationships between the sequences in (A). Bootstrap values of >50% are given on the respective branches. The first two letters of the acronyms indicate the species (Am, Antirrhinum majus; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Br, Brassica rapa; Gm, Glycine max; Ha, Helianthus annuus; Le, Lycopersicon eschulentum; Nt, Nicotiana tabacum; Os, Oryza sativa; Pt, Populus tremuloides; Sr, Stevia rebaudiana; St. Stevia tuberosum). The GenBank accession numbers of the sequences follow the species identifiers. Tissue localizations of ESTs and cDNAs are indicated beneath the acronyms.

[0021] FIG. 9 depicts the Promoter sequence of the gene Phylloplanin (SEQ ID NOS:49 and 50). A putative TATA box (−33 to −30) and a putative CAAT box (−47 to −43) are bold-faced. The phylloplanin transcription start site (+1) is bold-faced and underlined. The phylloplanin start codon (+48) is underlined. A portion of the phylloplanin amino acid sequence is indicated.

Detailed Description

[0022] The invention is directed to methods and compositions useful as antimicrobial and antifungal agents. More particularly, these methods and compositions involve the use of phylloplanin proteins as antimicrobial and antifungal agents in plants, humans and animals.

Definitions

[0023] To facilitate understanding of the invention set forth in the disclosure that follows, a number of terms are defined below.

[0024] The term “innate immunity” refers to a defense system that inhibits growth of microorganisms at their first point of contact.

[0025] The term “phylloplane” refers to a plant's epidermal layer that contributes to the innate pest/disease resistance of the plant.

[0026] The term “phylloplanins” refers to proteins produced by a plant's epidermal layer that contribute to the innate pest/disease resistance of the plant.

[0027] The term “TGSTs” refers to the tall glandular secreting trichome.

[0028] The term “SGTs” refers to the short glandular trichome.

[0029] The meaning of other terminology used herein should be easily understood by someone of ordinary skill in the art.

[0030] Fungicides are commonly used to inhibit fungal disease in plants, and are commercially available and used for preventing crop loss. Examples of such fungicides are listed in the following table.

[0031]


			CHEMICAL	COMMON
FRAC CODE¹	TARGET SITE²	GROUP NAME³	GROUP⁴	NAME⁵	COMMENTS⁶

1	mitosis:	MBC -	benzimidazoles	Fuberidazole	Resistance
	β-tubuline	fungicides	benomyl	thiabendazole	common in many
	assembly	(Methyl	carbendazim		fungal species.
		Benzimidazole	thiophanates	thiophanate	Several target site
		Carbamates)		thiophanate-methyl	mutations, mostly
					E198A/G/K, F200Y
					Positive cross
					resistance
					between the group
					members.
					Negative cross
					resistance to N-
					Phenylcarbamates
					High risk. See
					FRAC
					Benzimidazole
					Guidelines for
					resistance
					management.
2	NADH cytochrome	dicarboximides		chlozolinate	Resistance
	c reductase in lipid			iprodione	common in Botrytis
	peroxidation			procymidone	cinerea and found
	(proposed)			vinclozolin	in some other
					fungal species.
					Several mutations
					found in OS1
					histidine kinase
					(Daf 1), mostly
					I365S Cross
					resistance
					common between
					the group
					members. Medium
					to high risk. See
					FRAC
					Dicarboximide
					Guidelines for
					resistance
					management.
3	C14-	DMI-fungicides	imidazoles	imazalil	There are great
	demethylation	(DeMethylation		pefurazoate	differences in the
	in sterol	Inhibitors)		prochloraz	activity spectra of
	biosynthesis	(SBI: Class I)		triflumizole	the different DMI
			piperazines	triforine	fungicides.
			pyridines	pyrifenox	Resistance is
			pyrimidines	fenarimol	known in various
				nuarimol	fungal species.
			triazoles	azaconazole	Several resistance
				bitertanol	mechanisms
				bromuconazole	known incl. target
				cyproconazole	site mutation
				difenoconazole	Y136F, ABC
				diniconazole	transporters and
				epoxiconazole	others. Generally
				fenbuconazole	wise to accept that
				fluquinconazole	cross resistance is
				flusilazole	present between
				flutriafol	fungicides active
				hexaconazole	against the same
				imibenconazole	fungus. DMI
				ipconazole	fungicides are
				metconazole	Sterol Biosynthesis
				myclobutanil	Inhibitors (SBI's)
				penconazole	but show no cross
				propiconazole	resistance to other
				prothioconazole	SBI classes.
				simeconazole	Medium risk. See
				tebuconazole	FRAC SBI
				tetraconazole	Guidelines for
				triadimefon	resistance
				triadimenol	management.
				triticonazole
4	RNA polymerase I	PA - fungicides	acylalanines	benalaxyl	Resistance and
		(PhenylAmides)		furalaxyl	cross resistance
				metalaxyl	well known in
				metalaxyl-M	various Oomycetes
				(=mefenoxam)	but mechanism
			oxazolidinones	oxadixyl	unknown. High
			butyrolactones	ofurace	risk. See FRAC
					Phenylamide
					Guidelines
5	^Δ^₁₄-reductase	Amines	morpholines	Aldimorph	Decreased
	and	(“Morpholines”)		dodemorph	sensitivity
	^Δ^₈→^Δ^₇	(SBI: Class II)		fenpropimorph	described for
	isomerase			tridemorph	powdery mildews.
	in sterol		piperidines	fenpropidin	Cross resistance
	biosynthesis			piperalin	within the group
			spiroketalamines	spiroxamine	generally found but
					not to other SBI
					classes. Low to
					medium risk. See
					FRAC SBI
					Guidelines for
					resistance
					management.
6	phospholipid	phosphorothiolates		edifenphos	Resistance known
	biosynthesis,			iprobenfos (IBP)	for specific fungi.
	methyltransferase			pyrazophos	Low to medium
		dithiolanes		isoprothiolane	risk. Resistance
					management
					required if used for
					risky pathogens.
7	complex II in	carboxamides		benodanil boscalid	Resistance known
	fungal respiration			carboxin	for specific fungi.
	(succinate-			fenfuram	Target site
	dehydrogenase)			flutolanil	mutation H257L.
				furametpyr	Medium risk.
				mepronil	Resistance
				oxycarboxin	management
				thifluzamide	required if used for
					risky pathogens.
8	adenosin-	hydroxy-		bupirimate	Medium risk.
	deaminase	(2-amino-)		dimethirimol	Resistance and
		pyrimidines		thirimol	cross resistance
					known in powdery
					mildews.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
9	methionine	AP - fungicides		cyprodinil	Resistance known
	biosynthesis	(Anilino-		mepanipyrim	in Botrytis and
	(proposed)	Pyrimidines)		pyrimethanil	sporadically in
					Venturia,
					mechanism
					speculative (CGS).
					Medium risk. See
					FRAC
					Anilinopyrimidine
					Guidelines for
					resistance
					management.
10	mitosis:	N-phenyl		diethofencarb	Resistance known.
	β-tubulin	carbamates			Target site
	assembly				mutation E198K.
					Negative cross
					resistance to
					benzimidazoles.
					High risk.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
11	complex III of	Qol-fungicides	methoxy-acrylates	Azoxystrobin	Resistance known
	fungal respiration:	(Quinone outside		picoxystrobin	in various fungal
	ubiquinol oxidase,	Inhibitors)	Methoxy-	Pyraclostrobin	species. Target
	Qo site		carbamates		site mutations
			Oximino acetates	Kresoxim-methyl	G143A, F129L and
				trifloxystrobin	additional
			Oximino-	metominostrobin	mechanisms.
			acetamides		Cross resistance
			Oxazolidine-	Famoxadone	shown between all
			diones		members of the
			dihydro-dioxazines	fluoxastrobin	Qol group. High
			imidazolinones	fenamidone	risk. See FRAC
					Qol Guidelines for
					resistance
					management.
12	MAP protein	PP-fungicides		fenpiclonil	Resistance found
	kinase in osmotic	(PhenylPyrroles)		fludioxonil	sporadically,
	signal				mechanism
	transduction				speculative (OS-2
					kinase). Low to
					medium risk.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
13	G-proteins in early	quinolines		quinoxyfen	Resistance known.
	cell signalling				Medium risk.
	(proposed)				Resistance
					management
					required.
14	lipid peroxidation	AH-fungicides		biphenyl	Resistance known
	(proposed)	(Aromatic		chloroneb	to some fungi. Low
		Hydrocarbons)		dicloran	to medium risk.
		(chlorophenyls,		quintozene (PCNB)	Cross resistance
		nitroanilines)		tecnazene (TCNB)	patterns complex
				tolclofos-methyl	due to different
		heteroaromatics	1,2,4-thiadiazoles	etridiazole	activity spectra.
15	cell wall synthesis	cinnamic acids		dimethomorph	Low to medium
	(proposed)				risk. Resistance
					management
					required.
16.1	reductase in	MBI-R	isobenzofuranone	fthalide	Resistance not
	melanin	(Melanin	pyrroloquinolinone	pyroquilon	known
	biosynthesis	Biosynthesis	triazolobenzo-	tricyclazole
		Inhibitors -	thiazole
		Reductase
16.2	dehydratase in	MBI-D	cyclopropane-	carpropamid	Resistance known.
	melanin	(Melanin	carboxamide		Medium risk.
	biosynthesis	Biosynthesis	carboxamide	diclocyme	Resistance
		Inhibitors -	propionamide	fenoxani	management
		Dehydratase			required.
17	3-keto reductase	hydroxyanilides		fenhexamid	Low to medium
	during C4	(SBI: Class III)			risk. Resistance
	demethylation in				management
	sterol biosynthesis				required.
18	squalene	(SBI: class IV)	thiocarbamates	pyributicarb	Resistance not
	epoxidase in		allylamines	naftifine	known. Herbicide
	sterol biosynthesis			terbinafine	and fungicide.
					Medical fungicides
19	chitin synthase	polyoxins	peptidyl pyrimidine	polyoxin	Resistance known.
			nucleoside		Medium risk.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
20	cell division	phenylureas		pencycuron	Resistance not
	(proposed)				known
21	complex III of	QiI - fungicides	cyanoimidazole	cyazofamid	Resistance risk
	fungal respiration:	(Quinone inside			unknown but
	ubiquinone	Inhibitors)			assumed to be
	reductase, Qi site				medium to high
					(mutations at target
					site known in
					model organisms).
					Resistance
					management
					required.
22	mitosis	benzamides		zoxamide	Low to medium
	β-tubulin				risk. Resistance
	assembly				management
					required.
23	protein synthesis	enopyranuronic		blasticidin-S	Low to medium
		acid antibiotic			risk. Resistance
					management
					required.
24	protein synthesis	hexopyranosyl		kasugamycin	Medium risk.
		antibiotic			Resistance known.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
25	protein synthesis	glucopyranosyl		streptomycin	Bactericide.
		antibiotic			Resistance known.
					High risk.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
26	trehalase and/or	glucopyranosyl		validamycin	Resistance not
	inositol-	antibiotic			known
	biosynthesis
27	unknown	cyanoacetamide-		cymoxanil	Resistance claims
		oximes			described. Low to
					medium risk.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
28	cell membrane	carbamates		iodocarb	Low to medium
	permeability, fatty			propamocarb	risk. Resistance
	acids (proposed)			prothiocarb	management
					required.
29	uncoupler of		dinitrophenyl	binapacryl	Resistance not
	oxidative		crotonates	dinocap	known
	phosphorylation		pyrimidinone-	ferimzone	Resistance not
			hydrazones		known
			2,6-dinitro-	fluazinam	Low risk.
			anilines		However, resistant
					isolates of Botrytis
					claimed to exist in
					Japan in 2000
30	inhibitors of	organo tin	tri phenyl tin	fentin acetate	Some resistance
	oxidative	compounds	compounds	fentin chloride	cases known. Low
	phospho-rylation,			fentin hydroxide	to medium risk
	ATP synthases
31	DNA	carboxylic acids		oxolinic acid	Bactericide.
	topoisomerase				Resistance known.
	type II (gyrase)				Risk unknown.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
32	DNA/RNA	heteroaromatics	isoxazoles	hymexazole	Resistance not
	synthesis		isothiazolones	octhilinone	known
	(proposed)
33	unknown	phosphonates	ethyl phosphonates	fosetyl-Al	Miscellanous
				phophorous acid	compounds, mode
34	unknown	phthalamic acids		teclofthalam	of action generally
				(Bactericide)	not known.
35	unknown	benzotriazines		triazoxide	Use over several
36	unknown	benzene-		flusulfamide	years has not
		sulfonamides			revealed major
37	unknown	pyridazinones		diclomezine	resistance
					problems.
					Risk assumed to
					be low. No cross
					resistance between
					group members
P	host plant	P1	benzo-thiadiazole	acibenzolar-S-	Resistance not
	defence	salicylic acid	BTH	methyl	known
	induction	pathway
		P2	benzisothiazole	probenazole (also
				antibacterial and
				antifungal activity)
U	cell wall	U1	amino acid amide	benthiavalicarb	Mode of action and
	synthesis		carbamates	iprovalicarb	resistance risk
	(proposed)				unknown.
	ATP production in	U2	thiophene-	silthiofam	No long term
	respiration		carboxamides		experience
	(proposed)				available.
	complex I of	U3	pyrimidinamines	Diflumetorim	Resistance
	respiration				management
	(proposed)				required if high risk
	unknown	U4	thiocarbamate	methasulfocarb	organisms are
	Unknown	U5	thiazole-	ethaboxam	targeted.
			carboxamides		No cross
					resistance between
					group members
M	multi-site	M1	inorganics	Copper (different	Generally
	contact activity			salts)	considered a low
				Sulphur	risk group with no
		M2	dithio-carbamates	ferbam	signs of resistance
			and relatives	mancozeb	developing to the
				maneb	majority of
				metiram	fungicides. No
				propineb	cross resistance
				thiram	between Group
				zineb	members.
				ziram
		M3	phthalimides	captan
				captafol
				folpet
		M4	chloronitriles	chlorothalonil
			(phthalonitriles)
		M5	sulphamides	dichlofluanid
				tolylfluanid
		M6	guanidines	dodine
				guazatine
				iminoctadine
		M7	triazines	anilazine
		M8	quinones	dithianon
			(anthraquinones)
		M9	inorganics	Copper (different
				salts)
				Sulphur

Source: www.frac.info/publications/frac_list01
¹FRAC Code. Numbers and letters are used to distinguish the fungicide groups. The numbers were assigned primarily according to the time of product introduction to the market. The letters refer to P = host plant defence inducers, M = multi-site inhibitors, and U = recent molecules with unknown mode of action.
²Target Site of Action. If available the biochemical mode of action is given. In many cases the precise target site is not known. However, a grouping can be made due to cross resistance profiles within a group or in relation to other groups.
³Group Name. The Group Names listed are widely accepted in literature. They are based on different sources (mode of action, first important representative, chemical group).
⁴Chemical Group. Sub-grouping due to chemical considerations.
⁵Common name. Accepted (or proposed) common name for an individual active ingredient expected to appear on the product label as definition of the product.
⁶Comments on Resistance. If field resistance is known to one member of the Group, it is most likely but not exclusively valid that cross resistance to other Group members will be present. There is increasing evidence that cross resistance may not be clearly visible between Group members and that the degree of the effect can differ both between group members and fungal species or even within species. The intrinsic risk for resistance evolution to a given fungicide group is estimated to be low, medium or high according to the principles described in FRAC Monographs 1 and 2. A similar classification list of fungicides was published recently also by T. Locke on behalf of FRAC - UK (Fungicide Resistance, August 2001) and by P. Leroux (Classification des fongicides agricoles et resistance, Phytoma, La Defense des Vegetaux, No. 554, 43-51, November 2002).

Phylloplanins

[0032] Phylloplanin polypeptides are expressed in crop plants such as corn, soybean, tobacco, tomato, potato, pepper, datura, alfalfa, cucumber, medicago, and the like. Typical biological activities or functions associated with this family of polypeptides include inhibition of fungal spore germination. In one aspect, phylloplanin polypeptides of the invention further include oligomers or fusion polypeptides comprising at least one domain portion of one or more phylloplanin polypeptides, and fragments of any of these polypeptides that are capable of inhibiting fungal germination or which have antimicrobial activity.

[0033] This invention provides a family of polypeptides, termed phylloplanins, and the utility of these polypeptides and homologous polypeptides (>80% homology, commonly >90% homology, more typically >95% homology) from other species as antimicrobials (e.g., antifungals and antibacterials) against human and animal pathogens. A phylloplanin of the invention was first identified by washing Nicotiana tabacum leaves with water, lyophilizing the wash solution, resuspending the lyophilized material in water to give a leaf water wash (LWW) sample, and analyzing LWW by SDS-PAGE (FIG. 1).

[0034] A phylloplanin polypeptide of the invention includes a polypeptide that shares a sufficient degree of amino acid identity or similarity to a polypeptide having a sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 18, to be identified by those of skill in the art as a polypeptide likely to share particular structural domains, have biological activities in common with phylloplanin polypeptides, and/or bind to antibodies that also specifically bind to phylloplanins. The phylloplanin polypeptides of the invention may be isolated from naturally occurring sources. Alternatively, the phylloplanin polypeptides may be recombinantly produced and have the same structure as naturally occurring phylloplanin polypeptides, or may be produced to have structures that differ from naturally occurring phylloplanin polypeptides. Polypeptides derived from any phylloplanin polypeptide of the invention by any type of alteration (for example, but not limited to, insertions, deletions, or substitutions of amino acids, changes in glycosylation of the polypeptide, refolding or isomerization to change its three-dimensional structure or self-association state, and changes to its association with other polypeptides or molecules) are also phylloplanin polypeptides for the purposes of the invention. Therefore, the polypeptides provided by the invention include polypeptides characterized by amino acid sequences similar to those of the phylloplanin polypeptides or similar to phylloplanin polypeptides described herein, but into which modifications are naturally provided or deliberately engineered. A polypeptide that shares biological activities in common with members of the phylloplanin polypeptide family is a polypeptide having antimicrobial activity (e.g., antifungal activity)

[0035] Amino acid substitutions and other alterations (deletions, insertions, and the like) to the phylloplanin amino acid sequences (e.g., SEQ ID NO:18) are predicted to be more likely to alter or disrupt phylloplanin polypeptide activities if they result in changes to the consensus residues of the amino acid sequences, see FIGS. 8A and B, and particularly if those changes do not substitute an amino acid of similar structure (e.g., such as substitution of any one of the aliphatic residues -Ala, Gly, Leu, Ile, or Val- for another aliphatic residue), or a residue present in other phylloplanin polypeptides at that conserved position. Conversely, if a change is made to a phylloplanin polypeptide resulting in substitution of a residue at a position in the alignment that is not conserved from one of the other phylloplanin and phylloplanin-like sequences, it is less likely that such an alteration will affect the function of the altered phylloplanin polypeptide. The invention provides phylloplanin polypeptides and fragments of phylloplanin polypeptides, comprising altered amino acid sequences. Altered phylloplanin polypeptide sequences share at least 75% to 80%, or typically at least 85% to 90%, or more commonly at least 95% to 97.5%, or most commonly at least 99%, or most commonly at least 99.5% amino acid identity with the phylloplanin amino acid sequences provided herein.

[0036] The invention provides both full-length and mature forms of phylloplanin polypeptides. “Full-length” polypeptides are those having the complete primary amino acid sequence of the polypeptide as initially translated (see e.g., SEQ ID NO:17 and 18). The amino acid sequences of full-length polypeptides can be obtained, for example, by translation of the complete open reading frame (“ORF”) of a cDNA molecule (e.g., SEQ ID NO:17). Several full-length polypeptides may be encoded by a single genetic locus if multiple mRNA forms are produced from that locus by alternative splicing or by the use of multiple translation initiation sites. An example of a full length polypeptide of the invention includes the sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:18, from amino acid 1 to amino acid 150. The “mature form” of a polypeptide refers to a polypeptide that has undergone post-translational processing steps such as cleavage of the signal sequence or proteolytic cleavage to remove a prodomain. Multiple mature forms of a particular full-length polypeptide may be produced, for example by cleavage of the signal sequence at multiple sites, or by differential regulation of proteases that cleave the polypeptide. The mature form(s) of such polypeptide may be obtained by expression, in a suitable plant cell or other host cell, of a polynucleotide that encodes the full-length polypeptide. The sequence of the mature form of the polypeptide may also be determinable from the amino acid sequence of the full-length form, through identification of signal sequences or protease cleavage sites. An example of a mature form of the polypeptide of the invention is SEQ ID NO: 18, from amino acid residue x₁to amino acid residue 150, wherein x₁is an amino acid between and including residues 22, 23 and 24 (e.g., amino acid 24-150 of SEQ ID NO: 18). The phylloplanin polypeptides of the invention also include those that result from post-transcriptional or post-translational processing events such as alternate mRNA processing which can yield a truncated but biologically active polypeptide. Also encompassed within the invention are variations attributable to proteolysis such as differences in the N- or C-termini upon expression in different types of host cells, due to proteolytic removal of one or more terminal amino acids from the polypeptide (generally from about 1 to 5 terminal amino acids).

[0037] The invention further includes phylloplanin polypeptides with or without associated native-pattern glycosylation. Polypeptides expressed in yeast or plant expression systems (e.g., COS-1 or CHO cells) can be similar to or significantly different from a native polypeptide in molecular weight and glycosylation pattern, depending upon the choice of expression system. Expression of polypeptides of the invention in bacterial expression systems, such as E. coli, typically provides non-glycosylated molecules. Further, a given preparation can include multiple differentially glycosylated species of the polypeptide. Glycosyl groups can be removed through conventional methods, in particular those utilizing glycopeptidase (Boehringer Mannheim).

[0038] Species homologues of phylloplanin polypeptides and polynucleotides are also provided by the invention. As used herein, a “species homologue” is a polypeptide or polynucleotide with a different species of origin from that of a given polypeptide or polynucleotide, but with significant sequence similarity to the given polypeptide or polynucleotide. Species homologues may be isolated and identified by making suitable probes or primers from polynucleotides encoding the phylloplanin polypeptides provided herein and screening a suitable nucleic acid source from the desired species. Alternatively, homologues may be identified by screening a genome database containing sequences from one or more species utilizing a sequence (e.g., nucleic acid or amino acid) of a phylloplanin molecule of the invention. Such genome databases are readily available for a number of species (e.g., on the world wide web (www) at tigr.org/tdb; genetics.wisc.edu; stanford.edu/.about.ball; hiv-web.lanl.gov; ncbi.nlm.nig.gov; and ebi.ac.uk; pasteur.fr/other/biology). Computer algorithms, which connects two proteins through one or more intermediate sequences, can be used to identify closely related as well as distant homologs. For example, an algorithm that repetitively uses the results of the previous query as new search seeds such as Saturated BLAST can be used. Starting with a protein sequence, Saturated BLAST runs a BLAST search and identifies representative sequences for the next generation of searches. The procedure is run until convergence or until some predefined criteria are met. Saturated BLAST is available on the world wide web (www) at: bioinformatics.burnham-inst.org/xblast (see also, Li et al. Bioinformatics 16(12):1105-1110, 2000).

[0039] The invention also encompasses allelic variants of phylloplanin polypeptides and polynucleotides; that is, naturally-occurring forms of such polypeptides and polynucleotides in which differences in amino acid or nucleotide sequence are attributable to genetic polymorphism.

[0040] Fragments of the phylloplanin polypeptides of the invention are encompassed by the invention and may be in linear form or cyclized using known methods, for example, as described in H. U. Saragovi, et al., Bio/Technology 10:773-778 (1992) and in R. S. McDowell, et al., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 114:9245-9253 (1992). Phylloplanin polypeptides and fragments thereof, and the polynucleotides encoding them, include amino acid or nucleotide sequence lengths that are at least 25% (typically at least 50%, 60%, 70%, and, most commonly at least 80%) of the length of a phylloplanin polypeptide or polynucleotide and have at least 60% sequence identity (typically at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97.5%, or at least 99%, and, most commonly at least 99.5%) with that phylloplanin polypeptide or polynucleotide, where sequence identity is determined by comparing the amino acid or nucleotide sequences when aligned so as to maximize overlap and identity while minimizing sequence gaps. Also included in the invention are polypeptides and fragments, and polynucleotides encoding them, that contain or encode a segment comprising at least 8, or at least 10, or at least 15, or typically at least 20, or still more typically at least 30, or most commonly at least 40 contiguous amino acids. Such polypeptides and fragments may also contain a segment that shares at least 70% sequence identity (typically at least 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97.5%, or at least 99%, and most commonly at least 99.5%) with any such segment of any of the phylloplanin polypeptides or polynucleotides, where sequence identity is determined by comparing the sequences of the polypeptide or polynucleotide when aligned so as to maximize overlap and identity while minimizing sequence gaps.

[0041] The percent identity can be determined by visual inspection and mathematical calculation. The percent identity of two amino acid sequences or two polynucleotide sequences can be determined by comparing sequence information using the GAP computer program, version 6.0 described by Devereux et al. (Nucl. Acids Res. 12:387, 1984) and available from the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group. The default parameters for the GAP program include: (1) a unary comparison matrix (containing a value of 1 for identities and 0 for non-identities) for nucleotides, and the weighted comparison matrix of Gribskov and Burgess, Nucl. Acids Res. 14:6745, 1986, as described by Schwartz and Dayhoff, eds., Atlas of Polypeptide Sequence and Structure, National Biomedical Research Foundation, pp. 353-358, 1979; (2) a penalty of 3.0 for each gap and an additional 0.10 penalty for each symbol in each gap; and (3) no penalty for end gaps. Other programs used by those skilled in the art of sequence comparison may also be used, such as, for example, the BLASTN program version 2.0.9, available for use via the National Library of Medicine website, or the UW-BLAST 2.0 algorithm. Standard default parameter settings for UW-BLAST 2.0 are described at the following Internet webpage: blast.wustl.edulblast/README.html#References. In addition, the BLAST algorithm typically uses the BLOSUM62 amino acid scoring matrix, and optional parameters that may be used are as follows: (A) inclusion of a filter to mask segments of the query sequence that have low compositional complexity (as determined by the SEG program of Wootton & Federhen (Computers and Chemistry, 1993); also see Wootton and Federhen, Methods Enzymol. 266:554-71, 1996) or segments consisting of short-periodicity internal repeats (as determined by the XNU program of Claverie & States, Computers and Chemistry, 1993), and (B) a statistical significance threshold for reporting matches against database sequences, or E-score (the expected probability of matches being found merely by chance, according to the stochastic model of Karlin and Altschul (1990); if the statistical significance ascribed to a match is greater than this E-score threshold, the match will not be reported.); preferred E-score threshold values are 0.5, or in order of increasing preference, 0.25, 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001, 10⁻⁵, 10⁻¹⁰, 10⁻¹⁵, 10⁻²⁰, 10⁻²⁵, 10⁻³⁰, 10⁻⁴⁰, 10⁻⁵⁰, 10⁻⁷⁵, 10⁻¹⁰⁰.

[0042] The invention also provides for soluble forms of phylloplanin polypeptides comprising certain fragments or domains of these polypeptides, so long as the fragment retains a phylloplanin polypeptide activity. Soluble polypeptides are polypeptides that are capable of being secreted from the cells in which they are expressed. Soluble phylloplanin also include those polypeptides which include part of the transmembrane region, provided that the soluble phylloplanin polypeptide is capable of being secreted from a cell, and typically retains phylloplanin polypeptide activity. Soluble phylloplanin polypeptides further include oligomers or fusion polypeptides comprising at least one phylloplanin polypeptide and fragments of any of these polypeptides that have phylloplanin polypeptide activity. A secreted soluble polypeptide may be identified (and distinguished from its non-soluble membrane-bound counterparts) by separating intact cells which express the desired polypeptide from the culture medium, e.g., by centrifugation, and assaying the medium (supernatant) for the presence of the desired polypeptide. The presence of the desired polypeptide in the medium indicates that the polypeptide was secreted from the cells and thus is a soluble form of the polypeptide. The use of soluble phylloplanin polypeptides are advantageous for many applications. Purification of the polypeptides from recombinant host cells is facilitated, since the soluble polypeptides are secreted from the cells. Moreover, soluble polypeptides are generally more suitable than membrane-bound forms for parenteral administration and for many enzymatic procedures.

[0043] In another aspect, the invention provides polypeptides comprising various combinations of polypeptide domains from different phylloplanin polypeptides. In one embodiment, a fusion construct comprising at least one phylloplanin domain are linked via a peptide linker.

[0044] Additional variants within the scope of the invention include polypeptides that can be modified to create derivatives thereof by forming covalent or aggregative conjugates with other chemical moieties, such as glycosyl groups, lipids, phosphate, acetyl groups and the like. Covalent derivatives can be prepared by linking the chemical moieties to functional groups on amino acid side chains or at the N-terminus or C-terminus of a polypeptide. Conjugates comprising diagnostic (e.g., detectable) or therapeutic agents attached thereto are contemplated herein. Typically, such alteration, substitution, replacement, insertion or deletion retains the desired activity of the polypeptide or a substantial equivalent thereof.

[0045] Other derivatives include covalent or aggregative conjugates of the polypeptides with other polypeptides, such as by synthesis in recombinant culture as N-terminal or C-terminal fusion polypeptides. Examples of fusion polypeptides are discussed herein in connection with oligomers. Further, fusion polypeptides can comprise peptides added to facilitate purification and identification. Such peptides include, for example, poly-His or the antigenic identification peptides described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,912 and in Hopp et al., Bio/Technology 6:1204, 1988. One such peptide is the FLAG® peptide, which is highly antigenic and provides an epitope reversibly bound by a specific monoclonal antibody, enabling rapid assay and facile purification of expressed recombinant polypeptide. A murine hybridoma designated 4E11 produces a monoclonal antibody that binds the FLAG® peptide in the presence of certain divalent metal cations, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,912. The 4E11 hybridoma cell line is available from the American Type Culture Collection under accession no. HB9259. Monoclonal antibodies that bind the FLAG® peptide are available from Eastman Kodak Co., Scientific Imaging Systems Division, New Haven, Conn.

[0046] As used herein, a “chimeric polypeptide” or “fusion polypeptide” comprises a phylloplanin (including fragments) amino acid sequence of the invention operatively linked to a second polypeptide. The second polypeptide can be any polypeptide of interest having an activity or function independent of or related to the function of a phylloplanin polypeptide. For example, the second polypeptide can have a related activity to a phylloplanin polypeptide and can be a domain of a related but distinct member of the phylloplanin family of proteins such as, for example, cytoplasmic or transmembrane domain of a related phylloplanin polypeptide. Within the fusion polypeptide, the term “operatively linked” is intended to indicate that a phylloplanin polypeptide and the second polypeptide are fused in-frame to each other. The second polypeptide can be fused to the N-terminus or C-terminus of a phylloplanin of the invention. Additional examples of polypeptides of interest include peptide linkers, Fc polypeptides, leucine zipper polypeptides, and the like.

[0047] Encompassed by the invention are oligomers or fusion polypeptides that contain a phylloplanin polypeptide, one or more fragments of phylloplanin polypeptides, or any of the derivative or variant forms thereof as disclosed herein. In particular embodiments, the oligomers comprise soluble phylloplanin polypeptides. Oligomers can be in the form of covalently linked or non-covalently-linked multimers, including dimers, trimers, or higher oligomers. Leucine zippers and polypeptides derived from antibodies are among the peptides that can promote oligomerization of the polypeptides attached thereto.

[0048] Preparation of Fusion Polypeptides Comprising Certain Heterologous Polypeptides Fused to various portions of antibody-derived polypeptides (including the Fc domain) has been described (see, e.g., by Ashkenazi et al. PNAS USA 88:10535, 1991; Byrn et al. Nature 344:677, 1990; and Hollenbaugh and Aruffo, “Construction of Immunoglobulin Fusion Polypeptides”, in Current Protocols in Immunology, Suppl. 4, pages 10.19.1-10.19.11, 1992).

[0049] In another aspect, a fusion polypeptide comprising multiple phylloplanin polypeptides, with or without peptide linkers (spacer peptides) is provided. Among the suitable peptide linkers are those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,751,180 and 4,935,233. In some embodiments, a linker moiety separates the phylloplanin polypeptide domain and the second polypeptide domain in a fusion polypeptide. Such linkers are operatively linked to the C- and the N-terminal amino acids, respectively, of the two polypeptides. Typically a linker will be a peptide linker moiety. The length of the linker moiety is chosen to optimize the biological activity of the soluble phylloplanin and can be determined empirically without undue experimentation. The linker moiety should be long enough and flexible enough to allow a phylloplanin moiety to freely interact with a substrate or ligand. The linker moiety is a peptide between about one and 30 amino acid residues in length, typically between about two and 15 amino acid residues. One linker moiety is a -Gly-Gly- linker. The linker moiety can include flexible spacer amino acid sequences, such as those known in single-chain antibody research. Linking moieties are described, for example, in Huston, J. S., et al., PNAS 85:5879-5883 (1988), Whitlow, M., et al., Protein Engineering 6:989-995 (1993), and Newton, D. L., et al., Biochemistry 35:545-553 (1996). Other suitable peptide linkers are those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,751,180 and 4,935,233, which are hereby incorporated by reference. A DNA sequence encoding a desired peptide linker can be inserted between, and in the same reading frame as, the heterologous sequences (e.g., a phylloplanin encoding nucleic acid) and a second polypeptide encoding nucleic acid, using any suitable conventional technique. For example, a chemically synthesized oligonucleotide encoding the linker can be ligated between the sequences encoding a phylloplanin polypeptide and a second polypeptide of interest. In particular embodiments, a fusion polypeptide comprises from two to four soluble phylloplanin polypeptides separated by peptide linkers.

[0050] A polypeptide of the invention may be prepared by culturing transformed and/or recombinant host cells under culture conditions suitable to express the recombinant polypeptide. The resulting expressed polypeptide may then be purified from such culture (i.e., from culture medium or cell extracts) using known purification processes, such as gel filtration and ion exchange chromatography. The purification of the polypeptide may also include an affinity column containing agents which will bind to the polypeptide; one or more column steps over such affinity resins as concanavalin A-agarose, heparin-toyopearl® or Cibacrom blue 3GA Sepharose®; one or more steps involving hydrophobic interaction chromatography using such resins as phenyl ether, butyl ether, or propyl ether; or immunoaffinity chromatography. Alternatively, the polypeptide of the invention may be expressed in a form that will facilitate purification. For example, it may be expressed as a fusion polypeptide comprising, for example, maltose binding polypeptide (MBP), glutathione-S-transferase (GST) or thioredoxin (TRX). Kits for expression and purification of such fusion polypeptides are commercially available from New England BioLab (Beverly, Mass.), Pharmacia (Piscataway, N.J.) and InVitrogen, respectively. The polypeptide can also be tagged with an epitope and subsequently purified by using a specific antibody directed to such epitope. One such epitope (“FLAG®”) is commercially available from Kodak (New Haven, Conn.). Finally, one or more reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) steps employing hydrophobic RP-HPLC media, e.g., silica gel having pendant methyl or other aliphatic groups, can be employed to further purify the polypeptide. Some or all of the foregoing purification steps, in various combinations, can be employed to provide a substantially purified homogeneous recombinant polypeptide. A phylloplanin polypeptide thus purified is substantially free of other polypeptides and is defined in accordance with the invention as a “substantially purified polypeptide”; such purified polypeptides of the invention include purified antibodies that bind to a phylloplanin polypeptide, fragment, variant, binding partner and the like. A phylloplanin polypeptide of the invention may also be expressed as a product of transgenic animals or plants, e.g., as a component of the milk of transgenic cows, goats, pigs, or sheep which are characterized by somatic or germ cells containing a polynucleotide encoding the phylloplanin polypeptide of the invention.

[0051] It is also possible to utilize an affinity column comprising a polypeptide that binds a phylloplanin polypeptide of the invention, such as a monoclonal antibody generated against a phylloplanin polypeptide, to affinity-purify expressed polypeptides. Polypeptides can be removed from an affinity column using conventional techniques, e.g., in a high salt elution buffer and then dialyzed into a lower salt buffer or by changing pH or other components depending on the affinity matrix utilized, or be competitively removed using the naturally occurring substrate of the affinity moiety, such as a polypeptide derived from the invention. In this aspect of the invention, phylloplanin-binding polypeptides, such as the anti-phylloplanin antibodies of the invention or other polypeptides that can interact with a phylloplanin polypeptide of the invention, can be bound to a solid phase support such as a column chromatography matrix or a similar substrate suitable for identifying, separating, or purifying expressed polypeptides of the invention. Adherence of binding polypeptides (e.g., antibodies) to a solid phase contacting surface can be accomplished by any means; for example, magnetic microspheres can be coated with these binding polypeptides and held in the incubation vessel through a magnetic field.

[0052] A phylloplanin polypeptide may also be produced by known conventional chemical synthesis. Methods for constructing polypeptides by synthetic means are known in the art. The synthetically-constructed polypeptide, by virtue of sharing primary, secondary or tertiary structural and/or conformational characteristics with phylloplanin polypeptides, may possess biological properties in common therewith, including antimicrobial activity. Thus, they may be employed as biologically active or immunological substitutes for natural, purified polypeptides in screening assays, the development of antibodies, and in treating microbial infections.

[0053] The desired degree of purity depends on the intended use of the polypeptide. A relatively high degree of purity is desired when the polypeptide is to be administered in vivo, for example. In such a case, the polypeptides are purified such that no polypeptide bands corresponding to other polypeptides are detectable upon analysis by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). It will be recognized by one skilled in the art that multiple bands corresponding to the polypeptide can be visualized by SDS-PAGE, due to differential glycosylation, differential post-translational processing, and the like. In one aspect, the polypeptide of the invention is purified to substantial homogeneity, as indicated by a single polypeptide band upon analysis by SDS-PAGE. The polypeptide band can be visualized by silver staining, Coomassie blue staining, or by autoradiography.

[0054] Antibodies that are immunoreactive with a phylloplanin polypeptide are provided herein. Such antibodies specifically bind to the polypeptide (e.g., a polypeptide consisting of SEQ ID NO: 18 or fragment thereof) via the antigen-binding site of the antibody (as opposed to non-specific binding). In the invention, specifically binding phylloplanin antibodies are those that will specifically recognize and bind with phylloplanin polypeptides, homologues, and variants, but not with other molecules. Similarly, specifically binding anti-phylloplanin antibodies are those that will specifically recognize and bind with phylloplanin polypeptides, homologues, and variants, but not with other molecules. In one embodiment, the antibodies are specific for a phylloplanin polypeptide consisting of SEQ ID NO: 18 or fragment thereof, and do not cross-react with other polypeptides including related phylloplanin. In this manner, the phylloplanin polypeptides, fragments, variants, fusion polypeptides, and the like, as set forth above can be employed as “immunogens” in producing antibodies immunoreactive therewith.

[0055] The antigenic determinants or epitopes of phylloplanins used for immunization can be either linear or conformational (discontinuous). Linear epitopes are composed of a single section of amino acids of the polypeptide, while conformational or discontinuous epitopes are composed of amino acids sections from different regions of the polypeptide chain that are brought into close proximity upon polypeptide folding (Janeway et al., Immunobiology 3:9 (Garland Publishing Inc., 2nd ed. 1996)). Because folded polypeptides have complex surfaces, the number of epitopes available is quite numerous; however, due to the conformation of the polypeptide and steric hinderances, the number of antibodies that actually bind to the epitopes is less than the number of available epitopes (Janeway et al., supra). Epitopes can be identified by methods known in the art. Thus, one aspect of the invention relates to the antigenic epitopes of phylloplanin polypeptides. Such epitopes are useful for raising antibodies, in particular monoclonal antibodies, as described in more detail below. Additionally, epitopes from the polypeptides of the invention can be used as research reagents, in assays, and to purify specific binding antibodies from substances such as polyclonal sera or supernatants from cultured hybridomas. Such epitopes or variants thereof can be produced using techniques known in the art such as solid-phase synthesis, chemical or enzymatic cleavage of a polypeptide, or using recombinant DNA technology.

[0056] Antigen-binding antibody fragments that recognize specific epitopes may be generated by known techniques. For example, such fragments include but are not limited to: the F(ab′)₂fragments which can be produced by pepsin digestion of the antibody molecule and the Fab fragments which can be generated by reducing the disulfide bridges of the (ab′)₂fragments. Alternatively, Fab expression libraries may be constructed (Huse et al., 1989, Science, 246:1275) to allow rapid and easy identification of monoclonal Fab fragments with the desired specificity. Techniques described for the production of single chain antibodies (U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,778; Bird, 1988, Science 242:423; Huston et al., 1988, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5879; and Ward et al., 1989, Nature 334:544) can also be adapted to produce single chain antibodies against phylloplanin gene products. Single chain antibodies are formed by linking the heavy and light chain fragments of the Fv region via an amino acid bridge.

[0057] The terms “polynucleotide” as used herein, refers to a polymeric form of nucleotides of at least 10 bases in length (smaller nucleotide sequences are typically referred to as oligonucleotides). The nucleotides can be ribonucleotides, deoxyribonucleotides, or modified forms of either type of nucleotide. The term includes single and double stranded forms of DNA or RNA. DNA includes, for example, cDNA, genomic DNA, chemically synthesized DNA, DNA amplified by PCR, and combinations thereof. The polynucleotides of the invention include full-length genes or cDNA molecules as well as a combination of fragments thereof.

[0058] By “isolated polynucleotide” is meant a polynucleotide that is not immediately contiguous with both of the coding sequences with which it is immediately contiguous (one on the 5′ end and one on the 3′ end) in the naturally occurring genome of the organism from which it is derived. The term therefore includes, for example, a recombinant polynucleotide molecule, which is incorporated into a vector, e.g., an expression vector; into an autonomously replicating plasmid or virus; or into the genomic DNA of a prokaryote or eukaryote, or which exists as a separate molecule (e.g., a cDNA) independent of other sequences.

[0059] A phylloplanin polynucleotide of the invention comprises: (a) a polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide comprising a sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:18 from amino acid 1 to amino acid 150; (b) a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide comprising a sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:18 from amino acid residue x₁to amino acid residue 150, wherein x₁is an amino acid between and including residues 22, 23 and 24; (c) a sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:17 from nucleotide residue 1 to nucleotide residue 666, or a fragment thereof; (d) sequences complementary to a sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:17; (e) fragments of SEQ ID NO: 17 from nucleotide residue x₁to 666, wherein x₁is a nucleotide residue between and including residues 66-72, or their complements that specifically hybridize to the polynucleotide consisting of SEQ ID NO:17, under moderate to highly stringent conditions; and any of the foregoing wherein T can also be U (e.g., RNA sequences). Also encompassed by the invention are homologues of a phylloplanin polynucleotide of the invention. Polynucleotide homologues can be identified in several ways, including isolation of genomic or cDNA molecules from a suitable source, or computer searches of available DNA sequence databases.

[0060] Polynucleotides encoding a polypeptide or fragment thereof of the invention described herein, can be used as probes or primers for the isolation of nucleic acids or as query sequences for database searches. Such probes or primers can be obtained by “back-translation” from the amino acid sequences, or by identification of regions of amino acid identity with polypeptides for which the coding DNA sequence has been identified. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure can be employed to isolate and amplify a polynucleotide encoding a phylloplanin polypeptide or a desired combination of phylloplanin polypeptide fragments. Oligonucleotides that define the desired termini of a combination of DNA fragments are employed as 5′ and 3′ primers. The oligonucleotides can additionally contain recognition sites for restriction endonucleases to facilitate insertion of the amplified DNA fragments into an expression vector. PCR techniques are described in Saiki et al., Science 239:487 (1988); Recombinant DNA Methodology, Wu et al., eds., Academic Press, Inc., San Diego (1989), pp. 189-196; and PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Innis et. al., eds., Academic Press, Inc. (1990). The primer and probe sequences are presented in SEQ ID NOS:1-16 and 32-35.

[0061] Among the uses of the disclosed phylloplanin polynucleotides, and combinations of fragments thereof, is the use of fragments as probes or primers. Such fragments generally comprise at least about 17 contiguous nucleotides of a DNA sequence. In other embodiments, a DNA fragment comprises at least 30, or at least 60, contiguous nucleotides of a DNA sequence. The basic parameters affecting the choice of hybridization conditions and guidance for devising suitable conditions are set forth by Sambrook et al., 1989 and are described herein. Using knowledge of the genetic code in combination with the amino acid sequences set forth above, sets of degenerate oligonucleotides can be prepared. Such oligonucleotides are useful as primers, e.g., in polymerase chain reactions (PCR). In certain embodiments, degenerate primers can be used as probes for non-human genetic libraries. Such libraries include, but are not limited to, cDNA libraries, genomic libraries, and even electronic EST (express sequence tag) or DNA libraries. Homologous sequences identified by this method would then be used as probes to identify phylloplanin homologues.

[0062] The invention also includes polynucleotides that hybridize under moderately stringent conditions or highly stringent conditions, to polynucleotides encoding phylloplanin polypeptides described herein. The basic parameters affecting the choice of hybridization conditions and guidance for devising suitable conditions are set forth by Sambrook et al. (1989, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., chapters 9 and 11; and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 1995, Ausubel et al., eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., sections 2.10 and 6.3-6.4), and can be readily determined by those having ordinary skill in the art based on, for example, the length and/or base composition of the DNA. One way of achieving moderately stringent conditions involves the use of a prewashing solution containing 5×SSC, 0.5% SDS, 1.0 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), hybridization buffer of about 50% formamide, 6×SSC, and a hybridization temperature of about 55° C. (or other similar hybridization solutions, such as one containing about 50% formamide, with a hybridization temperature of about 42° C.), and washing conditions of about 60° C., in 0.5×SSC, 0.1% SDS. Generally, highly stringent conditions are defined as hybridization conditions as above, but with washing at approximately 68° C., 0.2×SSC, 0.1% SDS. SSPE (1×SSPE is 0.15M NaCl, 10 mM NaH₂PO₄, and 1.25 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) can be substituted for SSC (1×SSC is 0.15M NaCl and 15 mM sodium citrate) in the hybridization and wash buffers; washes are performed for 15 minutes after hybridization is complete. The wash temperature and wash salt concentration can be adjusted as necessary to achieve a desired degree of stringency by applying the basic principles that govern hybridization reactions and duplex stability, as known to those skilled in the art and described further below (see, e.g., Sambrook et al; 1989). When hybridizing a nucleic acid to a target nucleic acid of unknown sequence, the hybrid length is assumed to be that of the hybridizing nucleic acid. When nucleic acid of known sequences are hybridized, the hybrid length can be determined by aligning the sequences of the nucleic acids and identifying the region or regions of optimal sequence complementarity. The hybridization temperature for hybrids anticipated to be less than 50 base pairs in length should be 5 to 10° C. less than the melting temperature (T_m) of the hybrid, where T_mis determined according to the following equations. For hybrids less than 18 base pairs in length, T_m(° C.)=2(# of A+T bases)+4(# of G+C bases). For hybrids above 18 base pairs in length, T_m(° C.)=81.5+16.6(log₁₀[Na⁺])+0.41(% G+C)−(600/N), where N is the number of bases in the hybrid, and [Na⁺] is the concentration of sodium ions in the hybridization buffer ([Na⁺] for 1×SSC=0.165M). Each such hybridizing nucleic acid molecule has a length that is at least 15 nucleotides (or typically at least 18 to about 20 nucleotides, or at least 25 to about 30 nucleotides, or at least 40 nucleotides, or more commonly at least 50 nucleotides), or at least 25% (e.g., at least 50%, or at least 60%, or at least 70%, and most typically at least 80%) of the length of a polynucleotide of the invention to which it hybridizes, and has at least 60% sequence identity (e.g., at least 70% to about 75%, at least 80% to about 85%, at least 90% to about 95%, at least 97.5%, or at least 99%, and most commonly at least 99.5%) with a polynucleotide of the invention to which it hybridizes, where sequence identity is determined by comparing the sequences of the hybridizing nucleic acids when aligned so as to maximize overlap and identity while minimizing sequence gaps as described above.

[0063] The invention also provides genes corresponding to the polynucleotides disclosed herein. “Corresponding genes” are the regions of the genome that are transcribed to produce the mRNAs from which cDNA molecules are derived and may include contiguous regions of the genome necessary for the regulated expression of such genes. Corresponding genes may therefore include but are not limited to coding sequences, 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions, alternatively spliced exons, introns, promoters, enhancers, and silencer or suppressor elements. The corresponding genes can be isolated in accordance with known methods using the sequence information disclosed herein. Such methods include the preparation of probes or primers from the disclosed sequence information for identification and/or amplification of genes in appropriate genomic libraries or other sources of genomic materials. An “isolated gene” is a gene that has been separated from the adjacent coding sequences, if any, present in the genome of the organism from which the gene was isolated and includes both coding and non-coding regions.

[0064] Methods for making phylloplanin polypeptides are described below. Expression, isolation, and purification of the polypeptides and fragments of the invention can be accomplished by any suitable technique, including but not limited to the following methods.

[0065] An isolated polynucleotide of the invention may be operably linked to an expression control sequence such as the pDC412 or pDC314 vectors (Microbix Biosystems Inc., Toronto, Canada), or the pMT2 or pED expression vectors disclosed in Kaufman et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 19:4485-4490 (1991); and Pouwels et al. Cloning Vectors: A Laboratory Manual, Elsevier, N.Y., (1985), in order to produce a phylloplanin polypeptide recombinantly. Many suitable expression control sequences are known in the art. General methods of expressing recombinant polypeptides are also known and are exemplified in R. Kaufman, Methods in Enzymology 185, 537-566 (1990). As used herein “operably linked” means that a polynucleotide of the invention and an expression control sequence are situated within a construct, vector, or cell in such a way that the polypeptide encoded by a polynucleotide is expressed when appropriate molecules (such as polymerases) are present. In one embodiment, at least one expression control sequence is operably linked to a phylloplanin polynucleotide of the invention in a recombinant host cell or progeny thereof, the polynucleotide and/or expression control sequence having been introduced into the host cell by transformation or transfection, for example, or by any other suitable method. In another embodiment, at least one expression control sequence is integrated into the genome of a recombinant host cell such that it is operably linked to a polynucleotide encoding a phylloplanin polypeptide. In one embodiment of the invention, at least one expression control sequence is operably linked to a polynucleotide of the invention through the action of a trans-acting factor such as a transcription factor, either in vitro or in a recombinant host cell.

[0066] In addition, a polynucleotide encoding an appropriate signal peptide (native or heterologous) can be incorporated into expression vectors. The choice of signal sequence can depend on factors such as the type of host cells in which the recombinant polypeptide is to be produced. A DNA sequence for a signal sequence (secretory leader) can be fused in frame to a polynucleotide of the invention so that the DNA is initially transcribed, and the mRNA translated, into a fusion polypeptide comprising the signal peptide. A signal peptide that is functional in the intended host cells promotes secretion of the polypeptide. The signal peptide is cleaved from the polypeptide upon secretion of polypeptide from the cell. The skilled artisan will also recognize that the position(s) at which the signal peptide is cleaved can differ from that predicted by computer program, and can vary according to such factors as the type of host cells employed in expressing a recombinant polypeptide. A polypeptide preparation can include a mixture of polypeptide molecules having different N-terminal amino acids, resulting from cleavage of the signal peptide at more than one site. A phylloplanin polypeptide of the invention comprises a signal peptide from amino acid 1-23. This can be substituted by heterogenous signal peptides using known recombinant DNA techniques.

[0067] Established methods for introducing DNA into cells have been described (Kaufman, Large Scale Mammalian Cell Culture, 1990, pp. 15-69). Additional protocols using commercially available reagents, such as Lipofectamine lipid reagent (Gibco/BRL) or Lipofectamine-Plus lipid reagent, can be used to transfect cells (Felgner et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:7413-7417, 1987). Selection of stable transformants can be performed using methods known in the art such as, for example, resistance to cytotoxic drugs. Kaufman et al., Meth. in Enzymology 185:487-511, 1990, describes several selection schemes, such as dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) resistance. A suitable strain for DH selection can be CHO strain DX-B11, which is deficient in DHFR (Urlaub et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:4216-4220, 1980). A plasmid expressing the DHFR cDNA can be introduced into strain DX-B11, and only cells that contain the plasmid can grow in the appropriate selective media. Examples of selectable markers that can be incorporated into expression vectors include cDNAs conferring resistance to antibiotics, such as G418 and hygromycin B. Cells having the vector can be selected based on resistance to such compounds.

[0068] Alternatively, gene products can be obtained via homologous recombination, or “gene targeting” techniques. Such techniques employ the introduction of exogenous transcription control elements (such as the CMV promoter or the like) in a particular predetermined site on the genome, to induce expression of an endogenous phylloplanin of the invention. The location of integration into a host chromosome or genome can be determined by one of skill in the art, given the known location and sequence of the gene. In one embodiment, the invention contemplates the introduction of exogenous transcriptional control elements in conjunction with an amplifiable gene, to produce increased amounts of the gene product. The practice of homologous recombination or gene targeting is explained by Chappel in U.S. Pat. No. 5,272,071 (see also Schimke, et al. “Amplification of Genes in Somatic Mammalian cells,” Methods in Enzymology 151:85 (1987), and by Capecchi, et al., “The New Mouse Genetics: Altering the Genome by Gene Targeting,” TIG 5:70 (1989)).

[0069] A number of cell types may act as suitable host cells for expression of a polypeptide of the invention. It may be possible to produce the polypeptide in lower eukaryotes such as yeast or in prokaryotes such as bacteria, and in plant cells. Potentially suitable yeast strains include Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Kluyveromyces strains, Candida, or any yeast strain capable of expressing heterologous polypeptides. Potentially suitable bacterial strains include Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Salmonella typhimurium, or any bacterial strain capable of expressing heterologous polypeptides. If the polypeptide is made in yeast or bacteria, it may be necessary to modify the polypeptide produced therein, for example by phosphorylation or glycosylation of the appropriate sites, in order to obtain the functional polypeptide. Such covalent attachments may be accomplished using known chemical or enzymatic methods. The polypeptides may also be produced by operably linking an isolated polynucleotide of the invention to suitable control sequences in one or more insect expression vectors, and employing an insect expression system. Materials and methods for baculovirus/insect cell expression systems are commercially available in kit form from, e.g., Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif., U.S.A. (the MaxBac® kit), or as described in Summers and Smith, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 1555 (1987), and Luckow and Summers, Bio/Technology 6:47 (1988). As used herein, an host cell capable of expressing a polynucleotide of the invention is “transformed.” Cell-free translation systems could also be employed to produce polypeptides using RNAs derived from polynucleotide constructs disclosed herein. A host cell that comprises an isolated polynucleotide of the invention, typically operably linked to at least one expression control sequence, is a “recombinant host cell”.

[0070] The polynucleotides encoding the phylloplanin polypeptides of the invention can be used for numerous diagnostic or other useful purposes. The polynucleotides of the invention can be used to express recombinant polypeptides for analysis, characterization or therapeutic uses; as markers for tissues in which the corresponding polypeptide is preferentially expressed (either constitutively or at a particular stage of tissue differentiation or development or in disease states); as molecular weight markers on Southern gels; as chromosome markers or tags (when labeled) to identify chromosomes or to map related gene positions; to compare with endogenous DNA sequences in subjects to identify potential genetic disorders; as probes to hybridize and thus discover novel, related nucleic acid molecules; as a source of information to derive PCR primers for genetic fingerprinting; as a probe to “subtract-out” known sequences in the process of discovering other novel nucleic acids; for selecting and making oligomers for attachment to a “gene chip” or other support, including for examination of expression patterns; to raise anti-polypeptide antibodies using DNA immunization techniques; as an antigen to raise anti-DNA antibodies or elicit another immune response, and for gene therapy. Any or all polynucleotides suitable for these uses are capable of being developed into reagent grade or kit format for commercialization as products. For example, a kit of the invention will include one or more containers being compartmentalized and designed to hold primers and/or probes (e.g., SEQ ID Nos:1-16 and 32-35 to amplify phylloplanin), antibodies, polypeptides and related reagents (e.g., Taq polymerase and the like). Methods for performing these uses are known in the art. References disclosing such methods include, without limitation, “Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual”, 2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Sambrook et al. eds., 1989, and “Methods in Enzymology: Guide to Molecular Cloning Techniques”, Academic Press, Berger and Kimmel eds., 1987. The phylloplanin polypeptides can be employed in inhibiting antimicrobial infections in vitro or in vivo.

[0071] The polynucleotides encoding phylloplanin polypeptides, and the disclosed fragments and combinations of these polynucleotides can be used by one skilled in the art using known techniques to analyze abnormalities associated with the genes corresponding to these molecules. This enables one to distinguish conditions in which this marker is rearranged or deleted. In addition, polynucleotides of the invention or a fragment thereof can be used as a positional marker to map other genes of unknown location. The DNA can be used in developing treatments for any disorder mediated (directly or indirectly) by defective, or insufficient amounts of, the genes corresponding to the polynucleotides of the invention. The polynucleotides disclosed herein permit the detection of defective genes, and the replacement thereof with normal genes. Defective genes can be detected in in vitro diagnostic assays, and by comparison of a native nucleotide sequence disclosed herein with that of a gene derived from a person suspected of harboring a defect in this gene.

[0072] The phylloplanin polypeptides, fragments (including soluble fragments), variants, antibodies, and binding partners of the invention are useful to improve the disease-resistance or disease-tolerance of crops either during the life of the plant or for post-harvest crop protection. Pathogens exposed to the peptides are inhibited. The antifungal properties of a phylloplanin can eradicate a pathogen already established on the plant or may protect the plant from future pathogen attack. The eradicant effect of the polypeptide is particularly advantageous.

[0073] Exposure of a plant pathogen to a phylloplanin polypeptide can be achieved in various ways, for example: (a) The isolated phylloplanin polypeptide may be applied to plant parts or to the soil or other growth medium surrounding the roots of the plants or to the seed of the plant before it is sown using standard agricultural techniques (such as spraying). The phylloplanin polypeptide may have been extracted from plant tissue or chemically synthesised or extracted from micro-organisms genetically modified to express the peptide. The phylloplanin polypeptide may be applied to plants or to the plant growth medium in the form of a composition comprising the phylloplanin polypeptide in admixture with a solid or liquid diluent and optionally various adjuvants such as surface-active agents. Solid compositions may be in the form of dispersible powders, granules, or grains. (b) A composition comprising a micro-organism genetically modified to express a phylloplanin polypeptide may be applied to a plant or the soil in which a plant grows. (c) An endophyte genetically modified to express the phylloplanin polypeptide may be introduced into the plant tissue (for example, via a seed treatment process). An endophyte is defined as a micro-organism having the ability to enter into non-pathogenic endosymbiotic relationships with a plant host. A method of endophyte-enhanced protection of plants has been described in a series of patent applications by Crop Genetics International Corporation (for example, International Application Publication Number WO90/13224, European Patent Publication Number EP-125468-B1, International Application Publication Number WO91/10363, International Application Publication Number WO87/03303). The endophyte may be genetically modified to produce agricultural chemicals. International Patent Application Publication Number WO94/16076 (ZENECA Limited) describes the use of endophytes which have been genetically modified to express a plant-derived antifungal peptide. (d) DNA encoding a phylloplanin polypeptide may be introduced into the plant genome so that the polypeptide is expressed within the plant body (the DNA may be cDNA, genomic DNA or DNA manufactured using a standard nucleic acid synthesizer).

[0074] In practicing a method of treatment or use of the invention, a therapeutically effective amount of a therapeutic agent of the invention is contacted with a plant, subject or surface to treat or ameliorate a microbial (e.g., a fungal) infection. “Therapeutic agent” includes without limitation any of the phylloplanin polypeptides, fragments, and variants; phylloplanin polynucleotides, fragments, and variants; soluble forms of the phylloplanin polypeptides; antibodies to a phylloplanin polypeptide or fragment; phylloplanin polypeptide binding partners; complexes formed from the phylloplanin polypeptides, fragments, variants, and binding partners, and the like. As used herein, the term “therapeutically effective amount” means the total amount of each therapeutic agent or other active component of the pharmaceutical composition or method that is sufficient to show a meaningful benefit, e.g., treatment, healing, prevention or amelioration of microbial contamination or infection, or an increase in rate of treatment, healing, prevention or amelioration of such contamination and infections. Contacting a therapeutic agent with a subject, organism or surface can be done in vitro or in vivo for an amount and for a time sufficient to reduce microbial infection or presence.

[0075] Compositions comprising an effective amount of a phylloplanin polypeptide or fragment, or oligomer thereof, of the invention (from whatever source derived, e.g., recombinant and non-recombinant sources), in combination with other components such as a physiologically acceptable diluent, carrier, or excipient, are provided herein. The term “pharmaceutically acceptable” means a non-toxic material that does not interfere with the effectiveness of the biological activity of the active ingredient(s).

[0076] A phylloplanin polypeptide of the invention (including fragments) may be active in multimers (e.g., heterodimers or homodimers) or complexes with itself or other polypeptides. As a result, pharmaceutical compositions of the invention may comprise a polypeptide of the invention in such multimeric or complexed form. Such compositions contemplate the preparation of fragments of phylloplanin in any combination thereof as oligomers.

[0077] The invention further relates to gene promoter sequences isolated from a plant and their use to regulate chimeric gene expression in plants. In particular, the invention describes the isolation and use of DNA sequences which permit a high level of expression of foreign genes in transgenic plants.

[0078] The expression of genes in plants is controlled by a number of regulatory components, including nucleic acid and protein elements. Where the plant gene exists as double stranded DNA, the primary steps of expression involve the production of a messenger RNA by a polymerase enzyme. The initiation of this part of the expression process is controlled by a region commonly referred to as the “promoter”. The promoter lies upstream (5′) of the protein encoding region and may be constitutive or tissue-specific, developmentally-regulated and/or inducible.

[0079] Manipulation of crop plants to alter and/or improve phenotypic characteristics (such as productivity, quality, pathogen resistance) uses the expression of heterologous genes in plant tissues. Such genetic manipulation therefore relies on the availability of means to drive and to control gene expression as required; for example, on the availability and use of suitable promoters which are effective in plants and which regulate gene expression so as to give the desired effect(s) in the transgenic plant. It is advantageous to have the choice of a variety of different promoters so that the most suitable promoter may be selected for a particular gene, construct, cell, tissue, plant or environment.

[0080] Promoters (and other regulatory components) from bacteria, viruses, fungi and plants have been used to control gene expression in plant cells. Numerous plant transformation experiments using DNA constructs comprising various promoter sequences fused to various foreign genes (for example, bacterial marker genes) have led to the identification of useful promoter sequences. It has been demonstrated that sequences up to 500-1000 bases in most instances are sufficient to allow for the regulated expression of foreign genes. However, it has also been shown that sequences much longer than 1 kb may have useful features which permit high levels of gene expression in transgenic plants. A range of naturally-occurring promoters are known to be operative in plants and have been used to drive the expression of heterologous (both foreign and endogenous) genes in plants: for example, the constitutive 35S cauliflower mosaic virus promoter, the ripening-enhanced tomato polygalacturonase promoter (Bird et al, 1988, Plant Molecular Biology, 11:651-662), the E8 promoter (Diekman & Fischer, 1988, EMBO, 7:3315-3320) and the fruit specific 2A11 promoter (Pear et al, 1989, Plant Molecular Biology, 13:639-651) and many others.

[0081] As stated above, successful genetic manipulation relies on the availability of means to control plant gene expression as required. A scientist uses a suitable expression cassette (incorporating one or more promoters and other components) to regulate gene expression in the desired manner (for example, by enhancing or reducing expression in certain tissues or at certain developmental stages). The ability to choose a suitable promoter from a range of promoters having differing activity profiles is thus important.

[0082] In the invention, phylloplanin gene promoter has been isolated and fully sequenced from the surface of plant leaves. The phylloplanin promoter essentially controls the production of the protein known as “phylloplanin” in plants. This phylloplanin protein is associated with the plant epidermal layer.

[0083] According to the invention, there is provided a polynucleotide phylloplanin promoter capable of driving gene expression in plants. Such polynucleotide may contain a segment that shares at least 70% sequence identity (typically at least 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97.5%, or at least 99%, and most commonly at least 99.5%) with any such segment of any of the polynucleotide phylloplanin promoter sequence, where sequence identity is determined by comparing the sequences of the polynucleotide when aligned so as to maximize overlap and identity while minimizing sequence gaps. An example of a polynucleotide promoter of the invention includes the sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:34.

[0084] “Active variants” are DNA sequences partially homologous to SEQ ID NO:34 which retain promoter activity. It may be possible to alter the level or type of activity of these promoters by manipulating their sequences: for example, by altering the nucleotide sequence in key regulatory regions, by truncating the sequence or by deleting parts within the sequence.

[0085] The promoter of the invention is suitable for incorporation into polynucleotide constructs encoding any target gene or transcribable polynucleotide region so that the target gene or polynucleotide is expressed when the construct is transformed into a plant. The construct will typically contain a transcription termination signal.

[0086] The phylloplanin promoter may be synthesised ab initio using the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:34 as a guide. Alternatively, the promoters may be isolated from plant genomic libraries using suitable probes derived from the sequences or the promoter may be isolated using a PCR approach.

[0087] In practice the promoter of the invention may be inserted as a promoter in a recombinant polynucleotide construct designed for use in a plant. The construct is then inserted into the plant by transformation. Any plant species may be transformed with the construct, and any suitable transformation method may be employed.

[0088] In another embodiment, the fusion construct comprises (a) a polynucleotide comprising a sequence that is at least 80% identity (typically at least 90%, 95%, or at least 98%) with SEQ ID NO:34; and (b) a polynucleotide comprising a coding region of a polypeptide of interest, wherein the polynucleotide of (a) is operably linked to the polynucleotide of (b).

[0089] In yet another aspect, the invention provides methods for producing a transgenic plant which expresses a nucleic acid segment encoding the phylloplanin protein of the invention. The process of producing transgenic plants is well-known in the art. In general, the method comprises transforming a suitable host cell with a DNA segment which contains a promoter operatively linked to a coding region that encodes a phylloplanin protein. Such a coding region is generally operatively linked to a transcription-terminating region, whereby the promoter is capable of driving the transcription of the coding region in the cell, and hence providing the cell the ability to produce the recombinant protein in vivo. Alternatively, in instances where it is desirable to control, regulate, or decrease the amount of a particular recombinant phylloplanin protein expressed in a particular transgenic cell, the invention also provides for the expression of phylloplanin protein antisense mRNA. The use of antisense mRNA as a means of controlling or decreasing the amount of a given protein of interest in a cell is well-known in the art.

[0090] The invention further provides a transgenic plant, seed, cell, or any other form of regenerant, comprising a heterologous polynucleotide (>80% homology, commonly >90% homology, more typically >95% homology) selected from the group consisting of a) a polynucleotide comprising SEQ ID NO:17; b) a polynucleotide comprising a sequence selected from the group consisting of: from about nucleotide x₁to 666 of SEQ ID NO: 17 wherein x₁is a nucleotide between residues 66-72; c) a polynucleotide that hybridizes under moderate to highly stringent conditions to a polynucleotide comprising the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 17 and encoding a polypeptide that is a disease- or pest-resistant conferring protein; d) a nucleotide sequence complementary to a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 17; and e) any of the nucleotide sequences of a) to d) wherein T can also be U.

[0091] In yet another aspect, the invention provides a transgenic plant comprising a heterologous promoter of a fusion construct comprising (a) a polynucleotide comprising a sequence that is at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO:34; and (b) a polynucleotide comprising a coding region of a polypeptide of interest, wherein the polynucleotide of (a) is operably linked to the polynucleotide of (b).

Examples

[0092] SDS-PAGE analyses of LWW from greenhouse-grown TI 1068 leaves indicated the presence of four bands with molecular masses of 16 (I), 19 (II), 21 (III), and 25 (IV) kDa (FIG. 1B, lane d), which are collectively termed phylloplanins. Phylloplanins in LWW were relatively pure and abundant, compared to proteins present in leaf epidermal cells (FIG. 1B, lane b) or leaf extracellular fluid (FIG. 1B, lane c), suggesting selective deployment on the phylloplane. Sterile-grown TI 1068 LWW contained phylloplanins (FIG. 1B, lane e), indicating these proteins were not from leaf surface microbes and were not induced by pathogen attack. From measurement of the protein concentration in LWW (BCA assay), it was estimated that the phylloplane of greenhouse-grown TI 1068 leaves contains 100-200 ng protein/square-cm leaf surface. Field-grown TI 1068 LWW also contained phylloplanins, indicating that leaf surface proteins are present under natural conditions (FIG. 1C, lane a), and phylloplanins were renewed after washing. N. tabacum cultivars TI 1112 and TI 1406 that lack TGSTs, or secretion, respectively, produce substantial phylloplanins, so diterpene/sugar ester producing TGSTs are not the site of phylloplanin biosynthesis. Field-grown soybean and sunflower LWWs contained varying amounts of proteins (FIG. 1C, lanes c-d), as did greenhouse-grown corn, tomato, soybean, and potato, but these proteins were not further characterized.

[0093] T-Phylloplanins Inhibit P. tabacina Sporte Germination and Leaf Infection

[0094] P. tabacina is an oomycete pathogen that reproduces via airborne spores (Lucas, G. B. 1975), and initial host contact and spore deposition commences at the phylloplane (Svircev, A. M et al. 1989). LWW from greenhouse-grown TI 1068 plants inhibited P. tabacina spore germination (FIG. 2A, b; LD₅₀˜15-20 ng/μL [50 spores/μL]), as did LWW from sterile-grown plants. Protein digestion by immobilized Proteinase K relieved inhibition of spore germination (FIG. 2A,c), indicating that proteins were necessary for inhibition. Spore germination was not affected by water incubated with immobilized Proteinase K. Once spore germination was initiated, addition of LWW (100 ng/μL total protein) immediately arrested germination tube growth and development. Using GC, the levels of residual exudate diterpenes found in LWW were < 1/10 of the LD₅₀reported to inhibit P. tabacina germination (Kennedy, B. S. et al. 1992), and nicotine was not detected.

[0095] Intact N. tabacum Petite Havana SR1 plants, considered susceptible to P. tabacina, were infected by applying spores (50 spores/μL in 4 μL water) to the leaf surface. After 5 days, sporulating lesions developed at sites of application (FIG. 2B,a). Phylloplanins in TI 1068 LWW, when mixed with spores at total protein concentrations of 50 ng/μL or higher, inhibited leaf infection by P. tabacina (FIG. 2B,b). At 25 ng/μL total protein, 75% inhibition was observed, and no inhibition occurred with titrations below 12.5 ng/μL total protein. Similar results were observed in three independent experiments and in identical experiments using the susceptible cultivar KY 14. Like TI 1068, LWWs of Petite Havana and KY 14 contain a similar phylloplanin pattern, but unlike TI 1068, they produce much less trichome exudate. Other surface chemicals (e.g., surface lipids or trichome exudate components) may influence or accentuate phylloplanin activity, dispersion, or longevity, by acting as adducts or as solubilizing agents. Although it is difficult to estimate the role of a single component, such as the presence of phylloplanins, in blue mold susceptibility or resistance, outside the experimental conditions used here, phylloplanins appear to be a key component.

[0096] Isolation of the Novel T-Phylloplanin Gene

[0097] N. tabacum phylloplanins I, II, III, and IV share an identical N-terminal amino acid sequence (Table 1). Internal amino acid sequences were elucidated from peptides generated by trypsin digestion of Phylloplanins II and IV, and pepsin digestion of total LWW (Table 1). Degenerate, deoxyinosine-containing primers were synthesized and used in RT-PCR with cDNA generated from N. tabacum total leaf RNA as a template, and a 332 bp fragment was amplified. RLM-RACE was used to recover a full-length, N. tabacum Phylloplanin cDNA sequence (FIG. 3; Accession No. Genbank AY705384 (SEQ ID NO: 17)) of 666 bp in length, encoding a hydrophobic, basic (50% hydrophobicity, estimated pI 9.3, Vector NTI) 15.4 kDa protein containing 150 amino acids (SEQ ID NO: 18). Based on the N-terminus recovered from the mature phylloplanin (Ile-24) the first 23 amino acids comprise a signal sequence that targets the protein to the secretory pathway [TargetP version 1.0 (Emanuelsson, O. et al. 2000)]. The molecular mass of the mature protein is estimated to be ˜13 kDa. The protein of this mass from the leaf surface is not recovered, but instead recover four apparent bands of higher molecular masses. It is speculated that the molecular masses of native phylloplanins I-IV are increased due to the occurrence of complexes with cuticular lipids, or trichome exudate diterpenes or sugar esters. These complexes could serve to increase phylloplanin solubility in TGST exudate (diterpenes and sugar esters) and their subsequent dispersion on the leaf surface. Amphipathic sugar esters are known to solubilize largely hydrophobic diterpenes of TGST exudate. It is noted that highly hydrophobic, basic saposin-like proteins of animals (see below) also display anomalous migration in SDS-PAGE (Curstedt, T. et al. 1987), and it is suggested that phylloplanins may behave similarly. Putative sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana (Accession BAB02757) (SEQ ID NO:19) and from Oryza sativa (Accession BAC83536) (SEQ ID NO:20) have significant percent similarity to the Phylloplanin cDNA, as do unamiotated ESTs from N. sylvestris, Solanum tuberosum, and Lycopersicon esculentum. The genomic structure of gene Phylloplanin was elucidated from N. tabacum genomic DNA using a Genomewalker kit. The gene contains two exons (1: 175 bp; 2: 278 bp) that are separated by a 508 bp intron.

[0098]

TABLE 1

Amino acid sequences recovered from phylloplanin N-terminal analyses,
trypsin digestion, and pepsin digestion.
	Peak
Method	(min)	Phylloplanin	Amino Acid Sequence	Name

N-terminus	N/A	I	ILVPTLVST	(SEQ ID NO:21)

	N/A	II	ILVPTLVSTHISGLVFCSV	(SEQ ID NO:22)	aa-N1

	N/A	III	ILVPTLVSTHISGLVFCSV	(SEQ ID NO:23)	aa-N1

	N/A	IV	ILVPTLVSTHISGLVFCSV (major)	(SEQ ID NO:24)	aa-N1

Trypsin	36.2	I	ASVQLR	(SEQ ID NO:25)	aa-T1

	59.8	I	ILNLNI (major)	(SEQ ID NO:26)	aa-T4

			CGATNVISSTIT (minor)	(SEQ ID NO:27)	aa-T2

	56.7	III	LVVATPLSTCxATLxSVG	(SEQ ID NO:28)	aa-T3

	58.7	III	ILNLNI (major)	(SEQ ID NO:29)	aa-T4

			CGATxVxSSTIT (minor)	(SEQ ID NO:30)	aa-T2

Pepsin	1	I, II, III, IV	IRVGLAPTG	(SEQ ID NO:31)	aa-P1

Table 1. Amino acid sequences recovered from phylloplanin N-terminal analyses, trypsin digestion, and pepsin digestion.

[0099] Escherichia coli-Expressed T-Phylloplanin

[0100] A 10.3 kDa portion of the Phylloplanin gene (PhyllP) was expressed in E. coli as a fusion protein with MBP. Soluble fusion protein (MBP-PhyllP) was purified on an amylose column, cut with the protease Factor Xa to release PhyllP, and desalted on a 3 kDa centrifugal filter. Both MBP-PhyllP and PhyllP reacted with the phylloplanin-specific antibody (FIG. 4). The sample containing PhyllP inhibited P. tabacina spore germination at total protein concentrations greater than 160 ng/μL (FIG. 4a). Protease digestion relieved PhyllP inhibition of spore germination (FIG. 4b). A control sample containing MBP alone, produced by an empty pMal-c2x vector and treated exactly as the PhyllP sample, had no effect on spore germination (FIG. 4c), nor did protease-treated MBP (FIG. 4d), at total protein concentrations ≦500 ng/μL. We note that no inhibition of spore germination was observed with MBP-PhyllP fusion protein not treated with Factor Xa. It was concluded that released PhyllP is responsible for the observed inhibition, and since it is evident (FIG. 4a, SDS gel) that released PhyllP is a minor component of the sample, the inhibitory concentration of PhyllP is considered <<160 ng/μL. PhyllP was lost when purification from MBP and Factor Xa was attempted.

[0101] In leaf infection assays performed with KY 14 plants, PhyllP did not totally inhibit infection, but it greatly reduced necrotic leaf damage. MBP and uncut MBP-PhyllP fusion samples allowed successful infections. Lack of total inhibition with PhyllP may be due to insufficient protein concentration, or alternatively, adducts with lipids or trichome exudate components are essential for a native-protein like response.

[0102] The T-Phylloplanin Promoter Region Directs Expression in Small Glandular Trichomes

[0103] 1.8 kb of genomic DNA sequence was elucidated upstream from the Phylloplanin transcription start site. A 1.1 kb region of this DNA, as well as the 5′UTR and the Phylloplanin signal sequence, was fused in-frame with the reporter genes P-glucuronidase (GUS) and Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) and introduced into TI 1068 plants using Agrobacterium mediated plant transformation. GUS and GFP were expressed only in SGTs (FIG. 5), indicating activity of a SGT-specific promoter. TI 1068 SGTs are uniformly distributed over the leaf surface and protrude over surrounding epidermal cells (FIG. 1A). It appears that phylloplanins are biosynthesized locally in SGTs and are secreted to the leaf surface where, because of their hydrophobicity and basicity, phylloplanins dissolve in TGST exudate and are dispersed widely on the leaf surface during exudate flow, as exudate can reach ˜17% of leaf dry weight in TI 1068. Certain animal saposin proteins are also hydrophobic and basic, are secreted by epithelial cells, and operate as components of innate immunity at the pulmonary air:water interface (Weaver, T. E. and Conkright, J. J. 2001).

[0104] Ultrastructural studies of Akers et al. (Akers, C. P. et al. 1978) defined the structures of N. tabacum L. cv Xanthi SGTs and TGSTs. Glands of SGTs were observed to have about four cells separated by large intracellular spaces that contained substantial OsO₄stained material, apparently destined for secretion outside the gland. The nature of the accumulated substance was not defined, and it is now concluded that this substance is phylloplanins, as phylloplanins have been found on all tobaccos during this investigation. The pattern of intracellular space disposition observed in that study is very similar to that observed here using the phylloplanin-promoter-GFP construct (FIG. 5C). It was concluded that phylloplanins are produced exclusively in SGT gland cells, secreted to gland extracellular spaces, and then transferred outside the glands through constrictions at termini of intracellular spaces which is presumed to be “secretory pores” (yellow arrows, FIG. 5C) of unknown structure.

[0105] The majority of plant pathogens are fungi. When airborne spores land on a leaf surface, germination is the initial step leading to host colonization. It is hypothesized that by rapidly inhibiting spore germination at the leaf surface, preformed plant proteins may suppress pathogen infection before induced defenses become functional, in a manner analogous to secreted surface proteins of animals. This hypothesis is supported by the observations that surface-accumulated N. tabacum phylloplanins I-IV and E. coli-expressed PhyllP inhibit P. tabacina spore germination in vitro and limit leaf infection in situ. This hypothesis is also supported by the observation that the phylloplanin promoter directs expression specifically in SGTs, and from this we propose that phylloplanins are secreted to the leaf surface. Three observations link the gene Phylloplanin to phylloplanin I-IV proteins collected from the leaf surface. First, all amino acid sequences recovered from leaf surface phylloplanins I-IV are present in the predicted protein sequence from Phylloplanin, representing 54% of the mature protein open reading frame. Secondly, a functional link is provided between the gene and the proteins by replicating LWW blue mold inhibition with E. coli-expressed PhyllP. The phylloplanin promoter is a third, critical link between the gene and the proteins, and implicates SGTs as the sites of phylloplanin biosynthesis and delivery to the surface.

[0106] Secreted phylloplanins represent a novel leaf surface defense in the plant kingdom, wherein protein biosynthesis in SGTs allows deposition and dispersion of phylloplanins on leaf aerial surfaces to deter pathogen establishment. Further study is needed to identify the post-translational modifications or biochemical adducts thought to be present in phylloplanins I-IV, and to elucidate the mechanisms of phylloplanin-mediated fungal inhibition. It is emphasized that this work shows that SGTs must be regarded as specialized biosynthetic structures akin to TGSTs. Further study is needed to understand details of how SGTs deliver phylloplanins to the leaf surface, and whether these surface-disposed “protein factories” can be utilized for molecular farming.

[0107] Biological material and growth conditions. Greenhouse plants (Nicotiana tabacum L. tobacco introduction (TI) 1068, TI 1112, TI 1406; cultivars KY 14 and Petite Havana SR1 [hereafter referred to by TI number or cultivar name]) were germinated and grown in soil under natural light at 22-24° C. with weekly fertilization (20-20-20, N-P-K). Plants were transplanted into 15-cm pots and treated with the insecticide Marathon (Olympic Horticultural Products, Mainland, Pa.) at 3-4 wk post-emergence. Field plants (TI 1068, Glycine max, Helianthus annus) were grown at a farm near Lexington, Ky. during the 2002 growing season.

[0108] To grow sterile TI 1068 plants, seeds were immersed in 10% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 10 min, rinsed briefly in 70% (v/v) ethanol, washed 4 times in sterile water, and germinated on Murashige-Skoog (MS) medium (Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. 1962) containing B5 vitamins (100 mg/L myo-inositol, 10 mg/L thiamine-HCl, and 1 mg/L each pyridoxine-HCl and nicotinic acid) in a 22° C. growth chamber under fluorescent illumination (light/dark 16/8 h daily). Individual plants were transferred to PlantCons (ICN Biomedicals, Aurora, Ohio) containing MS agar at 3 wks post-emergence.

[0109] E. coli strain ER2508 (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.) was stored and propagated as described by the supplier. Spores of Peronospora tabacina (isolate KY-79) were harvested from sporulating lesions on KY 14 plants as described (Reuveni, M. et al. 1986).

[0110] Phylloplanin collection and SDS-PAGE. Water-soluble phylloplane components were collected from mature, fully-expanded leaves of all greenhouse-grown and field-grown plants by washing freshly-detached leaves in 200 mL nanopure water (NANOpure water system D4751, Barnstead/Thermolyne, Dubuque, Iowa) for 15 s. Cut petioles or cut leaf surfaces were not exposed to wash solutions.

[0111] Water washes were filtered (No. 1 filter paper, Whatman, Clifton, N.J.), lyophylized to dryness, resuspended in 3 mL sterile water, and centrifuged at 12,000×g for 5 min at 21° C. The supernatants were filtered (13 mm/0.45-μm syringe filter, Corning Glass Works, Corning, N.Y.) to exclude bacteria and fungi, and are hereafter referred to as leaf water washes (LWW).

[0112] Proteins were separated by SDS/12%/glycine-PAGE (Laemmli, U. K. 1970) or SDS/15%/tricine-PAGE (Judd, R. C. 1994) using a Mini-Protean II electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.), according to the manufacturer's instructions, and visualized with Coomassie blue or silver staining.

[0113] Protein concentration was estimated using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, Ill.) with BSA as a standard. Leaf surface areas were estimated by tracing leaves onto uniform-weight paper and weighing the cutouts.

[0114] Collection of epidermal peels and extracellular fluid (EF). Epidermal peels were prepared from greenhouse-grown TI 1068 plants as described (Kandra, L. et al. 1990), pulverized with liquid N₂, and proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. EF was collected using a vacuum infiltration method (Terry, M. E. and Bonner, B. A. 1980) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

[0115] GC analysis. Trichome exudate was collected from greenhouse-grown TI 1068 by immersing unwashed leaves for 15 s in 200 mL acetonitrile. The wash solutions were filtered (No. 1 filter paper, Whatman), dried, and trichome exudate was resuspended in 5 mL acetonitrile and quantified by GC (flame ionization detection) as trimethylsilyl derivatives prepared in dimethylformamide, as previously described (Wang, E. et al. 2001). To determine the amounts of trichome exudate biochemicals occurring in LWW, volumes equivalent to 200 cm²leaf surface areas were transferred to glass GC vials and dried in a vacuum oven (37° C.) overnight. Trichome exudate biochemicals were extracted at 21° C. with methylene chloride, dried, solubilized, derivatized, and analyzed by GC. The amount of residual trichome exudate biochemicals in LWW was assessed relative to total trichome exudate on an equivalent surface area basis.

[0116] Phylloplanin Amino Acid Sequencing. Proteins in greenhouse-grown TI 1068 LWW were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinyldifluoride (Immobilon-psq, Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) using a Mini-Protean II electroblot apparatus (Bio-Rad), and visualized with Coomassie blue. Phylloplanin bands were subjected to N-terminal sequencing using automated Edman degradation (Matsudaira, P. 1987) at the University of Kentucky Macromolecular Structure Analysis Facility (Lexington, Ky.). To recover internal aa sequence information, LWW from greenhouse-grown TI 1068 was separated by SDS-PAGE, stained with Coomassie, and 21 kDa and 19 kDa bands were excised and digested with trypsin. Total proteins in TI 1068 LWW were also digested with pepsin. Resulting tryptic or peptic peptides were separated by reversed-phase HPLC (Aquapore RP-300 7 μm particle size octyl reversed-phase column [Applied Biosystems, San Jose, Calif.]), manually collected based on absorbance at 214 nm, and samples were reduced in volume under vacuum to ˜50 μL. Amino acid sequence analyses of tryptic peptides were performed as above. For peptic peptides, similar analyses were performed at The Protein Facility of Iowa State University (Ames, Iowa).

[0117] A. thaliana AAP75801 cloning and expression in E. coli Total RNA was isolated from A. thaliana leaf tissue (100 mg FW) using an RNaqueous isolation kit. cDNA was synthesized from 5 μg total RNA using a Qiagen Omniscript RT kit, according to the manufacturer's protocol. The PCR amplification reaction (50 μL volume) was performed using PCR master mix (Promega), 2 μL cDNA template and 0.2 μM each of a primer pair designed from the GenBank A. thaliana AAP75801 mRNA sequence, RWS102-s (5′-ATGGGGGAAGACACTTTATCACATCCAAAAC-3′) (SEQ ID NO:32) and RWS102-as (5′-TCAGTTAAGAAGACCAAAGCCGGCAGG-3′) (SEQ ID NO:33). The PCR product was size-fractionated by electrophoresis in a 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel, isolated using a gel extraction kit (Qiagen Qiaex II), cloned into a pGem-T vector (Promega), and the purified plasmid (pGemT::AAP75801) was sequenced.

[0118] To overexpress AAP75801 in E. coli, the coding sequence was amplified from pGemT::AAP75801 using the primers RWS109-s (5′-GACGACGACAAGATGGGGGAAGACACTTTATCACA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:34); the underlined section is for ligation independent cloning [LIC], the bold text is the start codon) and RWS109-as (5′-GAGGAGAAGCCCGGTCAGTTAAGAAGACCAAAGCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO:35); the underlined section is for LIC, the bold text is the stop codon). Amplification was performed for 32 cycles using the following thermal profile: 95° C. for 45 s, 60° C. for 45 s, 72° C. for 45 s, followed by a final 5 min extension at 72° C. The PCR product was size-fractionated by electrophoresis in a 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel, and isolated using a gel extraction kit. The product was then annealed with the pET-30 Ek/LIC vector (Novagen), according to the manufacturer's ligation independent protocol, and cloned into E. coli BL21 (DE3) competent cells. Cultures (ranging in volumes from 100 mL to 1000 mL) were incubated at 37° C. (or 28° C. for low-temperature experiments) with shaking (250 rpm). When OD₆₀₀reached 0.6, isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactoside (ITPG) was added to a final concentration of 0.1 mM, and the culture was incubated with shaking for another 2 hours. Immediately after IPTG induction of protein expression, the Pet30:AAP75801 culture stopped growing (FIG. X). We were unable to prepare any heterologous AAP75801 from induced cultures, even using 1 L culture volumes and His-tag binding resin mediated column chromatography. These results indicate that the AAP75801 gene product is antibacterial.

[0119] Degenerate RT-PCR, RLM-RACE, and Elucidation of Genomic Structure. Total RNA was extracted from TI 1068 leaf tissue (100 mg fresh weight [FW]) with an RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, Calif.), and cDNA was synthesized from 5 μg total RNA using an Omniscript RT kit (Qiagen). PCR was performed using PCR master mix (Promega, Madison, Wis.) containing 3 μL cDNA template and 4 μM of each primer in a 50 μL volume. Successful amplification of a PCR product occurred with the primers 5′-ACWTTIGTITCIACWCATATYTCIGGICTIGTYTTTTG-3′(SEQ ID NO:1) and 5′-AARAAICCIGTTGGIGCIARICCIACYCTAAT-3′ (SEQ ID NO:2) where I=Inosine, W=A or T, Y=C or T, and R=A or G. Amplification was for 46 cycles using the following thermal profile: 95° C. for 45 s, 50° C. for 45 s, 72° C. for 1 min, followed by a final 4 min extension at 72° C. The PCR product was size-fractionated by electrophoresis in a 1% (w/v) agarose gel, extracted using a Qiaex II kit (Qiagen), cloned into a pGem-T vector (Promega), and sequenced.

[0120] For RNA ligase mediated rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RLM-RACE), total RNA was extracted from TI 1068 leaf tissue, as above. A GeneRacer kit (Invitrogen, Grand Island, N.Y.) containing SuperScript III was used to generate cDNAs, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Successful amplification of a 3′RACE product occurred with the GeneRacer 3′Primer and the gene-specific primer 5′-CTCAGTCCCCAAGTTTTTCCTAATGCATCAG-3′(SEQ ID NO:3). Successful amplification of a 5′RACE product occurred with the GeneRacer 5′Primer and the gene-specific primer 5′-GGCCAAGAAAGTTAACTAGCTGATGCATA-3′(SEQ ID NO:4). PCR cycling parameters were according to the GeneRacer protocol.

[0121] Phylloplanin genomic structure was elucidated using a GenomeWalker kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.), according to the manufacturer's protocol, using genomic DNA isolated from TI 1068 leaf tissue (100 mg FW) with a DNeasy plant kit (Qiagen). Primary PCR reactions were performed with a sense outer adaptor primer AP1, provided in the kit, and the antisense Phylloplanin-specific primer (5′-TGGAACAAGTATGGCAAATGCAGCGGGG-3′) (SEQ ID NO:5). Primary PCR cycling parameters were 7 cycles of 25 s at 94° C. and 3 min at 72° C., followed by 32 cycles of 25 s at 94° C. and 3 min at 67° C., with a final extension of 7 min at 67° C. Products of primary PCR were diluted 1:25 and 1 μL was used in nested PCR reactions with a sense inner adaptor primer (AP2), provided in the kit, and a nested antisense Phylloplanin-specific primer (5′-GGGGGTTGCGATTAATGCAGCCAAAAGGAAAA-3′) (SEQ ID NO:6). Nested PCR cycling parameters were 5 cycles of 25 s at 94° C. and 3 min at 72° C., followed by 20 cycles of 25 s at 94° C. and 3 min at 67° C., with a final extension of 7 min at 67° C. Amplified PCR products were amplified, size fractionated by gel electrophoresis, gel-extracted, cloned into pGem-T, and sequenced.

[0122] Expression vector construction and fusion protein purification. To overexpress the Phylloplanin gene in E. coli, a 10.3 kDa portion of the coding sequence (His33-Gly142, termed PhyllP) and the full-length mature protein coding sequence (Ile24-Asn150) were amplified incorporating XbaI and PstI restriction sites (PhyllP-sense: 5′-AGCTTCTAGACATATTTCGGGGCTGGTTTT (SEQ ID NO:7); PhyllP-antisense: 5′-AGCTCTGCAGTTAGCCGGTGGGGGCGAGGCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO:8); Full-sense: 5′-AGCTTCTAGAATACTTGTTCCAACACT-3′ (SEQ ID NO:9); Full-antisense: 5′-AGCTCTGCAGTTAATTGATGTTAAGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:10); restriction sites underlined). The PCR products were digested with XbaI and PstI and cloned into the pMal-c2x expression vector (New England Biolabs) to create a translation fusion between the gene inserts and malE (which encodes Maltose Binding Protein [MBP]). Protein expression was induced at 0.5 OD₆₀₀by the addition of 0.1 mM isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactoside. Cells were harvested and resuspended in column binding buffer (20 nM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) containing 1 mg/mL lysozyme. Cell lysate was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 10 min and the resulting supernatant was collected. Fusion protein was purified using amylose-mediated column chromatography (New England Biolabs) according to the manufacturer's instructions and examined by SDS-PAGE. Fractions containing purified fusion protein were pooled and concentrated to ˜1 mg/mL using a 3 kDa centrifugal filter (Microsep 3K Omega, Pall Laboratories, Ft. Myers, Fla.). Factor Xa (New England Biolabs) was added and samples were incubated for 48 h at 21° C. Salts and buffer components were removed using a 3 kDa centrifugal filter, and protein concentration was adjusted to 1 mg/mL with the addition of sterile water.

[0123] Phylloplanin antibody and western blots. TI 1068 LWW was separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue. Phylloplanin III was excised and used to generate a rabbit polyclonal antibody (Strategic Biosolutions, Newark, Del.). Immunodetection was performed using a 1:10,000 dilution of phylloplanin antiserum and a 1:10,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.).

[0124] Protease treatment. Insoluble Proteinase K (ProtK) affixed to acrylic beads (100 mg; P0803, Sigma) was placed into mini-spin filters (732-6027, Bio-Rad). The filters containing beads were placed into empty 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes, and the filters were washed with sterile water (700 μL; 2600×g for 1 min). The flow-through was discarded, and washing was repeated five times. The spin filters were transferred to empty 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. Samples were added to filters containing protease beads and incubated at 37° C. for 4 h, with periodic inversion to mix. The tubes were then centrifuged at 2600×g for 10 min, and the flow-through from each was collected and analyzed by SDS-PAGE or used in blue mold assays.

[0125] Peronospora tabacina spore germination and leaf infection assays. Freshly-collected P. tabacina spores were mixed with various concentrations of TI 1068 LWW, ProtK-treated TI 1068 LWW, or water incubated with ProtK, and germinated for 16 h in dark, humidified chambers as water drops (4 μL drops; 50 spores/μL) on microscope slides. The spores were then inspected visually at 100× magnification for germination. The absence of a germination tube after 16 h indicated inhibition. Similar experiments were performed with PhyllP, MBP, ProtK-treated PhyllP, and ProtK-treated MBP. To assess the immediacy of germination tube arrest by LWW, spores were observed after 3 h.

[0126] For the leaf infection assay, 6-wk-old, greenhouse-grown Petite Havana SR1 plants were pre-conditioned by incubation in a 21° C. growth room (14 h light) for 5 days. Dilution series (1, 5, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100 ng protein/μL) of TI 1068 LWW were prepared and mixed with freshly-collected P. tabacina spores immediately before inoculation. For each LWW dilution, 8-10 drops (4 μL drops; 100 spores/μL) were applied to one leaf of pre-conditioned plants. Plants were placed in dark, humidified chambers for 16 h to provide optimal conditions for infection, and then returned to the growth room. Treated leaves were excised 5 days after inoculation, placed in dark, humid chambers for 16 h, and then inspected for sporulation. The formation of P. tabacina sporulating lesions indicated successful leaf infection.

[0127] Elucidation of phylloplanin promoter sequence and activity. Genomic DNA was isolated from TI 1068 leaf tissue (100 mg FW) using a DNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen). The DNA sequence upstream of the Phylloplanin gene was recovered using a GenomeWalker kit (Clontech), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, ˜4 μg genomic DNA was digested to completion (36 h) in four separate reactions with restriction enzymes that generated blunt ends (Dra I, EcoR V, Pvu II, Stu II). The resulting ‘libraries’ were purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and precipitation. Digested genomic DNA in each library were then ligated to 5′GenomeWalker Adaptor molecules and purified again. A primary PCR reaction for each library was performed with a sense outer adaptor primer AP1, provided in the kit, and the antisense Phylloplanin-specific primer (5′-TGGAACAAGTATGGCAAATGCAGCGGGG-3′) (SEQ ID NO:5). Primary PCR cycling parameters were seven cycles of 25 s at 94° C. and 3 min at 72° C., followed by 32 cycles of 25 s at 94° C. and 3 min at 67° C., with a final extension of 7 min at 67° C. Products of primary PCR were diluted 1:25 and 1 μL was used in nested PCR reactions with a sense inner adaptor primer AP2, provided in the kit, and a nested antisense Phylloplanin-specific primer (5′-GGGGGTTGCGATTAATGCAGCCAAAAGGAAAA-3′) (SEQ ID NO:6). Nested PCR cycling parameters were five cycles of 25 s at 94° C. and 3 min at 72° C., followed by 20 cycles of 25 s at 94° C. and 3 min at 67° C., with a final extension of 7 min at 67° C. A 1.8 kB product was amplified from the Stu II-based library, and gel-extracted, cloned into pGem-T, and sequenced.

[0128] PCR using a Phylloplanin promoter-specific sense primer (5′-TGCTCCCACCACTAGAATCACCA-3′) (SEQ ID NO:11) and a Phylloplanin-specific antisense primer with an Xba I cut site (5′-AGCTTCTAGATGTTGGAACAAGTATGG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:12); Xba I site underlined) was then used to amplify the region of N. tabacum genomic DNA that included the first 25 amino acids of the phylloplanin protein (which included the signal sequence), the 5′ UTR, and a further 1.1 kB upstream. The PCR product was then cut with Xba I and HinD III (at a restriction site endogenous to the promoter) and cloned into the HinD III/Xba I-sites of pBIMC (kindly provided by D. Falcone, pBIMC is a variant of pBI121 modified to include a polylinker in place of the GUS gene) to replace the CaMV-35S promoter and create the vector pBI-PhylloProm. To analyze the spatial expression of the promoter, the reporter genes GUS and sGFP (kindly provided by D. Falcone) were PCR-amplified with primers that incorporated Xba I and Xho I restriction sites (GUS-sense: 5′-AGCTTCTAGAATGTTACGTCCTGTAGAAACCCCA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:13); GUS-antisense: 5′-AGCTCTCGAGTCATTGTTTGCCTCCCTGCT-3′ (SEQ ID NO:14); sGFP-sense: 5′-AGCTTCTAGAATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:15); sGFP-antisense: 5′-AGCTCTCGAGGCTTTACTTGTACAGCTCGT-3′ (SEQ ID NO 16); restriction sites underlined). The PCR products were gel-extracted, cut with Xba I and Xho I, and ligated between Xba I/Xho I sites in the polylinker of pBI-PhylloProm to create in-frame fusions with the Phylloplanin start codon and signal sequence. These constructs were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 by triparental mating, and introduced into TI 1068 using the leaf disk method (Horsch, R. B. et al. 1985). Kanamycin-resistant plantlets were derived from kanamycin-resistant callus tissue and transferred to soil. Leaf disks from pBI-PhylloProm:GUS explants were stained for GUS activity by incubation with 0.1% X-gluc (Jefferson, R. A. 1987) and photographed. Leaf disks from pBI-PhylloProm:GFP explants were magnified and photographed using a Zeiss Axioplan-2 imaging system.

[0129] Sequence data have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank data libraries under accession number AY705384.

[0130] Bioinformatic Analysis

[0131] Homologous open reading frames of selected cDNA or EST sequences giving significant (e-value cutoff 104) BLASTn, BLASTp, and tBLASTx (Altschul et al., 1990) scores against T-Phylloplanin nucleotide and amino acid sequences were first analyzed for the presence of signal peptides using TargetP. A multiple alignment of protein sequences with the predicted signal peptides removed was performed using the CLUSTALW algorithm (DNASTAR Lasergene Software, Madison, Wis. (See FIG. 8A)).

[0132] The identity of the sequences compared to that of TI 1068 Phylloplanan cDNA (Genbank Accession No. AY705384) are as follows:

[0133]


Genbank
Accession No.	Species

BG525459	Stevia rebaudiana (SEQ ID NO: 36)
CV545024	Brassica rapa (subspecies pekinensis) (SEQ ID NO: 37)
CD847345	Helianthus annuus (SEQ ID NO: 38)
AAP75801	Arabidopsis thaliana (SEQ ID NO: 39)
AAN28743	Arabidopsis thaliana (subspecies thalecress) (SEQ ID
	NO: 40)
XP479490	Oryza sativa (SEQ ID NO: 41)
XP479489	Oryza satvia (SEQ ID NO: 42)
CV502724	Solanum tuberosum (SEQ ID NO: 43)
BP903020	Lycopersicon esculentum (SEQ ID NO: 44)
AJ789767	Antirrhinum majus (SEQ ID NO: 45)
BU829351	Populustremula x populus tremuloides (SEQ ID NO: 46)
BM527339	Soybean clone ID Gm-c1061-3715 (SEQ ID NO: 47)
BM371086	Hardeum vulgare (SEQ ID NO: 48)

[0134] All of the foregoing accession numbers are incorporated by reference.

[0135] An unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum parsimony algorithm PROTPARS in the PHYLIP version 3.63 software package (Felsenstein, 2004), and tree robustness was estimated with 1000 bootstrapped data sets. The tree was displayed with the TREEVIEW version 3.2 software (Page, 1996). [See FIG. 8B]

[0136] The examples set forth above are provided to give those of ordinary skill in the art with a complete disclosure and description of how to make and use the various embodiments of the invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of what the inventors regard as their invention. Modifications of the above-described modes for carrying out the invention that are obvious to persons of skill in the art are intended to be within the scope of the following claims. All publications, patents, and patent applications cited in this specification are incorporated herein by reference as if each such publication, patent or patent application were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated herein by reference

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. An isolated polypeptide comprising a sequence that is at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:18, wherein the polypeptide is a disease- or pest-resistance conferring protein.

2. The isolated polypeptide of claim 1, wherein the polypeptide comprises a sequence that is at least 98% identical to SEQ ID NO: 18, wherein the polypeptide is a disease- or pest-resistance conferring protein.

3. The isolated polypeptide of claim 1, wherein the polypeptide comprises SEQ ID NO:18.

4. The isolated polypeptide of claim 1, wherein the polypeptide comprises the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of: amino acid sequence from residue 22 to 150 of SEQ ID NO: 18, amino acid sequence from residue 23 to 150 of SEQ ID NO: 18, and amino acid sequence from residue 24 to 150 of SEQ ID NO: 18.

5. A composition comprising a polypeptide of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

6. A polypeptide produced by culturing a recombinant host cell genetically engineered to contain an isolated polynucleotide encoding the polypeptide of claim 1, wherein the culturing is performed under conditions to promote expression of the polypeptide.

Patent Citations (10)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US4751180(A)	1988-06-01	Cousens et al.	Applicant
US4935233(A)	1990-06-01	Bell et al.	Applicant
US4946778(A)	1990-08-01	Ladner et al.	Applicant
US5011912(A)	1991-04-01	Hopp et al.	Applicant
US5272071(A)	1993-12-01	Chappel	Applicant
EP125468(B1)	1992-10-01		Applicant
WO87/03303	1987-06-01		Applicant
WO90/13224	1990-11-01		Applicant
WO91/10363	1991-07-01		Applicant
WO94/16076	1994-07-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (34)

Shepherd et al., Phylloplanins of Tabacco Are Defensive Proteins deployed on Aerial Surfaces by Short Glandular Trichomes, The Plant Cell, vol. 17, 2005, pp. 1851-1861.Examiner
Ashkenazi, A., et al. “Protection against endotoxic shock by a tumor necrosis factor receptor immunoadhesin” PNAS USA, (1991). 88:10535.Applicant
Bird, C. R., et al. “The tomato polygalacturonase gene and ripening-specific expression in transgenic plants” Plant Molecular Biology, (1988)11:651-662.Applicant
Bird, R. E., et al. “Single-chain antigen-binding proteins” Science, (1988), 242:423.Applicant
Byrn, R. A., et al. “Biological properties of a CD4 immunoadhesion” Nature, (1990) 344:677.Applicant
Capecchi, M. R. “The new mouse genetics: Altering the genome by gene targeting” TIG, (1989).5:70.Applicant
Ausubel, F. M., et al., eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., sections 2.10 and 6.3-6.4.Short Protocols in Molecular Biology, Third Edition A Compendium of Methods from Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, (1995).Applicant
Devereux, J., et al.“A comprehensive set of sequence analysis for the VAX” Nucl. Acids Res. (1984).12:387.Applicant
Diekman, J. and Robert L. Fischer “Interaction of a DNA binding factor with the 5′-flanking region of an ethylene-responsive fruit ripening gene from tomato” EMBO, (1988). 7:3315-3320.Applicant
Felgner, P.L. et al. “Lipofection: A highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, (1987) 84:7413-7417.Applicant
Gribskov, M. and Richard R. Burgess “Sigma factors from E. coli, B. subtilis, phage SP01, and phage T4 are homologous proteins” Nucl. Acids Res. (1986) 14:6745.Applicant
Saragovi, H. U., et al. “Loops and secondary structure mimetics: development and applications in basic science and rational drug design” Bio/Technology, (1992). 10:773-778.Applicant
Hollenbaugh, D. and Alejandro Aruffo, “Construction of Immunoglobulin Fusion Proteins”, Current Protocols in Immunology, (1992). Suppl. 4, pp. 10.19.1-10.19.11.Applicant
Hopp, T. P., et al. “A short polypeptide marker sequence useful fo recombinant protein identification and purification” Bio/Technology, (1988). 6:1204-1210.Applicant
Huse, W. D., et al. “Generation of a large combinatorial library of the immunoglobulin repertoire in phage lambda” Science, (1989). 246:1275-1281.Applicant
Huston, J. S., et al. “Protein engineering of antibody binding sites: Recovery of specific activity in an anti-digoxin single-chain Fv analogue produced in Escherichia coli” PNAS, (1988). 85:5879-5883.Applicant
Janeway, Jr., C.A. et al. Immunobiology, (1996). 3:9, Garland Publishing Inc., 2nd ed.Applicant
Kaufman, R. J., “Use of recombinant DNA technology for engineering mammalian cells to produce proteins” Large Scale Mammalian Cell Culture, (1990) pp. 15-69.Applicant
Kaufman, R. J. et al. “Improved vectors for stable expression of foreign genes in mammalian cells by use of the untranslated leader sequence from EMC virus” Nucleic Acids Res, (1991). 19:4485-4490.Applicant
Kaufman, R. J. “Vectors used for expression in mammalian cellls” Meth. in Enzymology, (1990). 185:487-511.Applicant
Li, W., et al. “Saturated Blast: an automated multiple intermediate sequence search used to detect distant homology” Bioinformatics, (2000) 16(12):1105-1110.Applicant
Luckow, V. A. and Max D. Summers “Trends in the development of baculovirus expression vectors” Bio/Technology, (1988). 6:47-55.Applicant
Newton, D. L., et al. “Angiogenin single-chain immunofusions: Influence of peptide linkers and spacers between fusion protein domains” Biochemistry, (1996). 35:545-553.Applicant
Pear, J. R., et al. “Isolation and characterization of a fruit-specific cDNA and the corresponding genomic clone from tomato” Plant Molecular Biology, (1989). 13:639-651.Applicant
Kaufman, R. J., “Selection and coamplification of heterologous genes in mammalian cells” Methods in Enzymology, (1990) 185, 537-566.Applicant
McDowell, R. S. and Thomas R. Gadek, “Structural studies of potent constrained RGD peptides” J. Amer. Chem. Soc., (1992). 114(24):9245-9253.Applicant
Wu, U. et al., eds., Recombinant DNA Methodology, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego (1989), pp. 189-196.Applicant
Saiki, R. K., et al. “Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase” Science, (1988). 239:487-491.Applicant
Sambrook, et al. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., (1989) chapters 9 and 11.Applicant
Schimke, R. T., et al. “Amplification of genes in somatic mammalian cells” Methods in Enzymology, (1987) 151:85-104.Applicant
Urlaub, G., et al. “Isoloation of Chinese hamster cell mutants deficient in dihydrofolate reductase activity” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, (1980) 77:4216-4220.Applicant
Ward, E. S., et al. “Binding activities of a repertoire of single immunoglobulin variable domains secreted from Escherichia coli” Nature, (1989). 341:544-546.Applicant
Whitlow, M., et al. “An improved linker for single-chain Fv with reduced aggregation and enhanced proteolytic stability” Protein Engineering, (1993) 6 (8):989-995.Applicant
Wootton, J. C. and Scott Federhen “Analysis of compositionally biased regions in sequence databases” Methods in Enzymol, (1996) 266:554-571.Applicant

Abstract

Description

Cross-Reference to Related Applications

Statement Regarding Federally Sponsored Research

[0002] The invention was supported by Grant 5-41170 from the Kentucky Tobacco Research And Development Center, and therefore the government may have rights in the invention.

Technical Field

[0003] Methods of producing and using compositions useful as antimicrobial agents are provided. More particularly, these compositions involve the use of phylloplanin proteins.

Background

Summary

[0008] The invention further relates to a method of inhibiting microbial proliferation in an organism comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a phylloplanin polypeptide.

[0012] Other aspects of the invention are described throughout the specification.

Brief Description of the Drawings

Detailed Description

Definitions

[0023] To facilitate understanding of the invention set forth in the disclosure that follows, a number of terms are defined below.

[0024] The term “innate immunity” refers to a defense system that inhibits growth of microorganisms at their first point of contact.

[0025] The term “phylloplane” refers to a plant's epidermal layer that contributes to the innate pest/disease resistance of the plant.

[0026] The term “phylloplanins” refers to proteins produced by a plant's epidermal layer that contribute to the innate pest/disease resistance of the plant.

[0027] The term “TGSTs” refers to the tall glandular secreting trichome.

[0028] The term “SGTs” refers to the short glandular trichome.

[0029] The meaning of other terminology used herein should be easily understood by someone of ordinary skill in the art.

[0031]


			CHEMICAL	COMMON
FRAC CODE¹	TARGET SITE²	GROUP NAME³	GROUP⁴	NAME⁵	COMMENTS⁶

1	mitosis:	MBC -	benzimidazoles	Fuberidazole	Resistance
	β-tubuline	fungicides	benomyl	thiabendazole	common in many
	assembly	(Methyl	carbendazim		fungal species.
		Benzimidazole	thiophanates	thiophanate	Several target site
		Carbamates)		thiophanate-methyl	mutations, mostly
					E198A/G/K, F200Y
					Positive cross
					resistance
					between the group
					members.
					Negative cross
					resistance to N-
					Phenylcarbamates
					High risk. See
					FRAC
					Benzimidazole
					Guidelines for
					resistance
					management.
2	NADH cytochrome	dicarboximides		chlozolinate	Resistance
	c reductase in lipid			iprodione	common in Botrytis
	peroxidation			procymidone	cinerea and found
	(proposed)			vinclozolin	in some other
					fungal species.
					Several mutations
					found in OS1
					histidine kinase
					(Daf 1), mostly
					I365S Cross
					resistance
					common between
					the group
					members. Medium
					to high risk. See
					FRAC
					Dicarboximide
					Guidelines for
					resistance
					management.
3	C14-	DMI-fungicides	imidazoles	imazalil	There are great
	demethylation	(DeMethylation		pefurazoate	differences in the
	in sterol	Inhibitors)		prochloraz	activity spectra of
	biosynthesis	(SBI: Class I)		triflumizole	the different DMI
			piperazines	triforine	fungicides.
			pyridines	pyrifenox	Resistance is
			pyrimidines	fenarimol	known in various
				nuarimol	fungal species.
			triazoles	azaconazole	Several resistance
				bitertanol	mechanisms
				bromuconazole	known incl. target
				cyproconazole	site mutation
				difenoconazole	Y136F, ABC
				diniconazole	transporters and
				epoxiconazole	others. Generally
				fenbuconazole	wise to accept that
				fluquinconazole	cross resistance is
				flusilazole	present between
				flutriafol	fungicides active
				hexaconazole	against the same
				imibenconazole	fungus. DMI
				ipconazole	fungicides are
				metconazole	Sterol Biosynthesis
				myclobutanil	Inhibitors (SBI's)
				penconazole	but show no cross
				propiconazole	resistance to other
				prothioconazole	SBI classes.
				simeconazole	Medium risk. See
				tebuconazole	FRAC SBI
				tetraconazole	Guidelines for
				triadimefon	resistance
				triadimenol	management.
				triticonazole
4	RNA polymerase I	PA - fungicides	acylalanines	benalaxyl	Resistance and
		(PhenylAmides)		furalaxyl	cross resistance
				metalaxyl	well known in
				metalaxyl-M	various Oomycetes
				(=mefenoxam)	but mechanism
			oxazolidinones	oxadixyl	unknown. High
			butyrolactones	ofurace	risk. See FRAC
					Phenylamide
					Guidelines
5	^Δ^₁₄-reductase	Amines	morpholines	Aldimorph	Decreased
	and	(“Morpholines”)		dodemorph	sensitivity
	^Δ^₈→^Δ^₇	(SBI: Class II)		fenpropimorph	described for
	isomerase			tridemorph	powdery mildews.
	in sterol		piperidines	fenpropidin	Cross resistance
	biosynthesis			piperalin	within the group
			spiroketalamines	spiroxamine	generally found but
					not to other SBI
					classes. Low to
					medium risk. See
					FRAC SBI
					Guidelines for
					resistance
					management.
6	phospholipid	phosphorothiolates		edifenphos	Resistance known
	biosynthesis,			iprobenfos (IBP)	for specific fungi.
	methyltransferase			pyrazophos	Low to medium
		dithiolanes		isoprothiolane	risk. Resistance
					management
					required if used for
					risky pathogens.
7	complex II in	carboxamides		benodanil boscalid	Resistance known
	fungal respiration			carboxin	for specific fungi.
	(succinate-			fenfuram	Target site
	dehydrogenase)			flutolanil	mutation H257L.
				furametpyr	Medium risk.
				mepronil	Resistance
				oxycarboxin	management
				thifluzamide	required if used for
					risky pathogens.
8	adenosin-	hydroxy-		bupirimate	Medium risk.
	deaminase	(2-amino-)		dimethirimol	Resistance and
		pyrimidines		thirimol	cross resistance
					known in powdery
					mildews.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
9	methionine	AP - fungicides		cyprodinil	Resistance known
	biosynthesis	(Anilino-		mepanipyrim	in Botrytis and
	(proposed)	Pyrimidines)		pyrimethanil	sporadically in
					Venturia,
					mechanism
					speculative (CGS).
					Medium risk. See
					FRAC
					Anilinopyrimidine
					Guidelines for
					resistance
					management.
10	mitosis:	N-phenyl		diethofencarb	Resistance known.
	β-tubulin	carbamates			Target site
	assembly				mutation E198K.
					Negative cross
					resistance to
					benzimidazoles.
					High risk.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
11	complex III of	Qol-fungicides	methoxy-acrylates	Azoxystrobin	Resistance known
	fungal respiration:	(Quinone outside		picoxystrobin	in various fungal
	ubiquinol oxidase,	Inhibitors)	Methoxy-	Pyraclostrobin	species. Target
	Qo site		carbamates		site mutations
			Oximino acetates	Kresoxim-methyl	G143A, F129L and
				trifloxystrobin	additional
			Oximino-	metominostrobin	mechanisms.
			acetamides		Cross resistance
			Oxazolidine-	Famoxadone	shown between all
			diones		members of the
			dihydro-dioxazines	fluoxastrobin	Qol group. High
			imidazolinones	fenamidone	risk. See FRAC
					Qol Guidelines for
					resistance
					management.
12	MAP protein	PP-fungicides		fenpiclonil	Resistance found
	kinase in osmotic	(PhenylPyrroles)		fludioxonil	sporadically,
	signal				mechanism
	transduction				speculative (OS-2
					kinase). Low to
					medium risk.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
13	G-proteins in early	quinolines		quinoxyfen	Resistance known.
	cell signalling				Medium risk.
	(proposed)				Resistance
					management
					required.
14	lipid peroxidation	AH-fungicides		biphenyl	Resistance known
	(proposed)	(Aromatic		chloroneb	to some fungi. Low
		Hydrocarbons)		dicloran	to medium risk.
		(chlorophenyls,		quintozene (PCNB)	Cross resistance
		nitroanilines)		tecnazene (TCNB)	patterns complex
				tolclofos-methyl	due to different
		heteroaromatics	1,2,4-thiadiazoles	etridiazole	activity spectra.
15	cell wall synthesis	cinnamic acids		dimethomorph	Low to medium
	(proposed)				risk. Resistance
					management
					required.
16.1	reductase in	MBI-R	isobenzofuranone	fthalide	Resistance not
	melanin	(Melanin	pyrroloquinolinone	pyroquilon	known
	biosynthesis	Biosynthesis	triazolobenzo-	tricyclazole
		Inhibitors -	thiazole
		Reductase
16.2	dehydratase in	MBI-D	cyclopropane-	carpropamid	Resistance known.
	melanin	(Melanin	carboxamide		Medium risk.
	biosynthesis	Biosynthesis	carboxamide	diclocyme	Resistance
		Inhibitors -	propionamide	fenoxani	management
		Dehydratase			required.
17	3-keto reductase	hydroxyanilides		fenhexamid	Low to medium
	during C4	(SBI: Class III)			risk. Resistance
	demethylation in				management
	sterol biosynthesis				required.
18	squalene	(SBI: class IV)	thiocarbamates	pyributicarb	Resistance not
	epoxidase in		allylamines	naftifine	known. Herbicide
	sterol biosynthesis			terbinafine	and fungicide.
					Medical fungicides
19	chitin synthase	polyoxins	peptidyl pyrimidine	polyoxin	Resistance known.
			nucleoside		Medium risk.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
20	cell division	phenylureas		pencycuron	Resistance not
	(proposed)				known
21	complex III of	QiI - fungicides	cyanoimidazole	cyazofamid	Resistance risk
	fungal respiration:	(Quinone inside			unknown but
	ubiquinone	Inhibitors)			assumed to be
	reductase, Qi site				medium to high
					(mutations at target
					site known in
					model organisms).
					Resistance
					management
					required.
22	mitosis	benzamides		zoxamide	Low to medium
	β-tubulin				risk. Resistance
	assembly				management
					required.
23	protein synthesis	enopyranuronic		blasticidin-S	Low to medium
		acid antibiotic			risk. Resistance
					management
					required.
24	protein synthesis	hexopyranosyl		kasugamycin	Medium risk.
		antibiotic			Resistance known.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
25	protein synthesis	glucopyranosyl		streptomycin	Bactericide.
		antibiotic			Resistance known.
					High risk.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
26	trehalase and/or	glucopyranosyl		validamycin	Resistance not
	inositol-	antibiotic			known
	biosynthesis
27	unknown	cyanoacetamide-		cymoxanil	Resistance claims
		oximes			described. Low to
					medium risk.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
28	cell membrane	carbamates		iodocarb	Low to medium
	permeability, fatty			propamocarb	risk. Resistance
	acids (proposed)			prothiocarb	management
					required.
29	uncoupler of		dinitrophenyl	binapacryl	Resistance not
	oxidative		crotonates	dinocap	known
	phosphorylation		pyrimidinone-	ferimzone	Resistance not
			hydrazones		known
			2,6-dinitro-	fluazinam	Low risk.
			anilines		However, resistant
					isolates of Botrytis
					claimed to exist in
					Japan in 2000
30	inhibitors of	organo tin	tri phenyl tin	fentin acetate	Some resistance
	oxidative	compounds	compounds	fentin chloride	cases known. Low
	phospho-rylation,			fentin hydroxide	to medium risk
	ATP synthases
31	DNA	carboxylic acids		oxolinic acid	Bactericide.
	topoisomerase				Resistance known.
	type II (gyrase)				Risk unknown.
					Resistance
					management
					required.
32	DNA/RNA	heteroaromatics	isoxazoles	hymexazole	Resistance not
	synthesis		isothiazolones	octhilinone	known
	(proposed)
33	unknown	phosphonates	ethyl phosphonates	fosetyl-Al	Miscellanous
				phophorous acid	compounds, mode
34	unknown	phthalamic acids		teclofthalam	of action generally
				(Bactericide)	not known.
35	unknown	benzotriazines		triazoxide	Use over several
36	unknown	benzene-		flusulfamide	years has not
		sulfonamides			revealed major
37	unknown	pyridazinones		diclomezine	resistance
					problems.
					Risk assumed to
					be low. No cross
					resistance between
					group members
P	host plant	P1	benzo-thiadiazole	acibenzolar-S-	Resistance not
	defence	salicylic acid	BTH	methyl	known
	induction	pathway
		P2	benzisothiazole	probenazole (also
				antibacterial and
				antifungal activity)
U	cell wall	U1	amino acid amide	benthiavalicarb	Mode of action and
	synthesis		carbamates	iprovalicarb	resistance risk
	(proposed)				unknown.
	ATP production in	U2	thiophene-	silthiofam	No long term
	respiration		carboxamides		experience
	(proposed)				available.
	complex I of	U3	pyrimidinamines	Diflumetorim	Resistance
	respiration				management
	(proposed)				required if high risk
	unknown	U4	thiocarbamate	methasulfocarb	organisms are
	Unknown	U5	thiazole-	ethaboxam	targeted.
			carboxamides		No cross
					resistance between
					group members
M	multi-site	M1	inorganics	Copper (different	Generally
	contact activity			salts)	considered a low
				Sulphur	risk group with no
		M2	dithio-carbamates	ferbam	signs of resistance
			and relatives	mancozeb	developing to the
				maneb	majority of
				metiram	fungicides. No
				propineb	cross resistance
				thiram	between Group
				zineb	members.
				ziram
		M3	phthalimides	captan
				captafol
				folpet
		M4	chloronitriles	chlorothalonil
			(phthalonitriles)
		M5	sulphamides	dichlofluanid
				tolylfluanid
		M6	guanidines	dodine
				guazatine
				iminoctadine
		M7	triazines	anilazine
		M8	quinones	dithianon
			(anthraquinones)
		M9	inorganics	Copper (different
				salts)
				Sulphur

Source: www.frac.info/publications/frac_list01
¹FRAC Code. Numbers and letters are used to distinguish the fungicide groups. The numbers were assigned primarily according to the time of product introduction to the market. The letters refer to P = host plant defence inducers, M = multi-site inhibitors, and U = recent molecules with unknown mode of action.
²Target Site of Action. If available the biochemical mode of action is given. In many cases the precise target site is not known. However, a grouping can be made due to cross resistance profiles within a group or in relation to other groups.
³Group Name. The Group Names listed are widely accepted in literature. They are based on different sources (mode of action, first important representative, chemical group).
⁴Chemical Group. Sub-grouping due to chemical considerations.
⁵Common name. Accepted (or proposed) common name for an individual active ingredient expected to appear on the product label as definition of the product.
⁶Comments on Resistance. If field resistance is known to one member of the Group, it is most likely but not exclusively valid that cross resistance to other Group members will be present. There is increasing evidence that cross resistance may not be clearly visible between Group members and that the degree of the effect can differ both between group members and fungal species or even within species. The intrinsic risk for resistance evolution to a given fungicide group is estimated to be low, medium or high according to the principles described in FRAC Monographs 1 and 2. A similar classification list of fungicides was published recently also by T. Locke on behalf of FRAC - UK (Fungicide Resistance, August 2001) and by P. Leroux (Classification des fongicides agricoles et resistance, Phytoma, La Defense des Vegetaux, No. 554, 43-51, November 2002).

Phylloplanins

Examples

[0093] T-Phylloplanins Inhibit P. tabacina Sporte Germination and Leaf Infection

[0096] Isolation of the Novel T-Phylloplanin Gene

[0098]

TABLE 1

Amino acid sequences recovered from phylloplanin N-terminal analyses,
trypsin digestion, and pepsin digestion.
	Peak
Method	(min)	Phylloplanin	Amino Acid Sequence	Name

N-terminus	N/A	I	ILVPTLVST	(SEQ ID NO:21)

	N/A	II	ILVPTLVSTHISGLVFCSV	(SEQ ID NO:22)	aa-N1

	N/A	III	ILVPTLVSTHISGLVFCSV	(SEQ ID NO:23)	aa-N1

	N/A	IV	ILVPTLVSTHISGLVFCSV (major)	(SEQ ID NO:24)	aa-N1

Trypsin	36.2	I	ASVQLR	(SEQ ID NO:25)	aa-T1

	59.8	I	ILNLNI (major)	(SEQ ID NO:26)	aa-T4

			CGATNVISSTIT (minor)	(SEQ ID NO:27)	aa-T2

	56.7	III	LVVATPLSTCxATLxSVG	(SEQ ID NO:28)	aa-T3

	58.7	III	ILNLNI (major)	(SEQ ID NO:29)	aa-T4

			CGATxVxSSTIT (minor)	(SEQ ID NO:30)	aa-T2

Pepsin	1	I, II, III, IV	IRVGLAPTG	(SEQ ID NO:31)	aa-P1

Table 1. Amino acid sequences recovered from phylloplanin N-terminal analyses, trypsin digestion, and pepsin digestion.

[0099] Escherichia coli-Expressed T-Phylloplanin

[0102] The T-Phylloplanin Promoter Region Directs Expression in Small Glandular Trichomes

[0129] Sequence data have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank data libraries under accession number AY705384.

[0130] Bioinformatic Analysis

[0132] The identity of the sequences compared to that of TI 1068 Phylloplanan cDNA (Genbank Accession No. AY705384) are as follows:

[0133]


Genbank
Accession No.	Species

BG525459	Stevia rebaudiana (SEQ ID NO: 36)
CV545024	Brassica rapa (subspecies pekinensis) (SEQ ID NO: 37)
CD847345	Helianthus annuus (SEQ ID NO: 38)
AAP75801	Arabidopsis thaliana (SEQ ID NO: 39)
AAN28743	Arabidopsis thaliana (subspecies thalecress) (SEQ ID
	NO: 40)
XP479490	Oryza sativa (SEQ ID NO: 41)
XP479489	Oryza satvia (SEQ ID NO: 42)
CV502724	Solanum tuberosum (SEQ ID NO: 43)
BP903020	Lycopersicon esculentum (SEQ ID NO: 44)
AJ789767	Antirrhinum majus (SEQ ID NO: 45)
BU829351	Populustremula x populus tremuloides (SEQ ID NO: 46)
BM527339	Soybean clone ID Gm-c1061-3715 (SEQ ID NO: 47)
BM371086	Hardeum vulgare (SEQ ID NO: 48)

[0134] All of the foregoing accession numbers are incorporated by reference.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. An isolated polypeptide comprising a sequence that is at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:18, wherein the polypeptide is a disease- or pest-resistance conferring protein.

3. The isolated polypeptide of claim 1, wherein the polypeptide comprises SEQ ID NO:18.

5. A composition comprising a polypeptide of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

Patent Citations (10)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US4751180(A)	1988-06-01	Cousens et al.	Applicant
US4935233(A)	1990-06-01	Bell et al.	Applicant
US4946778(A)	1990-08-01	Ladner et al.	Applicant
US5011912(A)	1991-04-01	Hopp et al.	Applicant
US5272071(A)	1993-12-01	Chappel	Applicant
EP125468(B1)	1992-10-01		Applicant
WO87/03303	1987-06-01		Applicant
WO90/13224	1990-11-01		Applicant
WO91/10363	1991-07-01		Applicant
WO94/16076	1994-07-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (34)

Shepherd et al., Phylloplanins of Tabacco Are Defensive Proteins deployed on Aerial Surfaces by Short Glandular Trichomes, The Plant Cell, vol. 17, 2005, pp. 1851-1861.Examiner

Ashkenazi, A., et al. “Protection against endotoxic shock by a tumor necrosis factor receptor immunoadhesin” PNAS USA, (1991). 88:10535.Applicant

Bird, C. R., et al. “The tomato polygalacturonase gene and ripening-specific expression in transgenic plants” Plant Molecular Biology, (1988)11:651-662.Applicant

Bird, R. E., et al. “Single-chain antigen-binding proteins” Science, (1988), 242:423.Applicant

Byrn, R. A., et al. “Biological properties of a CD4 immunoadhesion” Nature, (1990) 344:677.Applicant

Capecchi, M. R. “The new mouse genetics: Altering the genome by gene targeting” TIG, (1989).5:70.Applicant

Ausubel, F. M., et al., eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., sections 2.10 and 6.3-6.4.Short Protocols in Molecular Biology, Third Edition A Compendium of Methods from Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, (1995).Applicant

Devereux, J., et al.“A comprehensive set of sequence analysis for the VAX” Nucl. Acids Res. (1984).12:387.Applicant

Diekman, J. and Robert L. Fischer “Interaction of a DNA binding factor with the 5′-flanking region of an ethylene-responsive fruit ripening gene from tomato” EMBO, (1988). 7:3315-3320.Applicant

Felgner, P.L. et al. “Lipofection: A highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, (1987) 84:7413-7417.Applicant

Gribskov, M. and Richard R. Burgess “Sigma factors from E. coli, B. subtilis, phage SP01, and phage T4 are homologous proteins” Nucl. Acids Res. (1986) 14:6745.Applicant

Saragovi, H. U., et al. “Loops and secondary structure mimetics: development and applications in basic science and rational drug design” Bio/Technology, (1992). 10:773-778.Applicant

Hollenbaugh, D. and Alejandro Aruffo, “Construction of Immunoglobulin Fusion Proteins”, Current Protocols in Immunology, (1992). Suppl. 4, pp. 10.19.1-10.19.11.Applicant

Hopp, T. P., et al. “A short polypeptide marker sequence useful fo recombinant protein identification and purification” Bio/Technology, (1988). 6:1204-1210.Applicant

Huse, W. D., et al. “Generation of a large combinatorial library of the immunoglobulin repertoire in phage lambda” Science, (1989). 246:1275-1281.Applicant

Huston, J. S., et al. “Protein engineering of antibody binding sites: Recovery of specific activity in an anti-digoxin single-chain Fv analogue produced in Escherichia coli” PNAS, (1988). 85:5879-5883.Applicant

Janeway, Jr., C.A. et al. Immunobiology, (1996). 3:9, Garland Publishing Inc., 2nd ed.Applicant

Kaufman, R. J., “Use of recombinant DNA technology for engineering mammalian cells to produce proteins” Large Scale Mammalian Cell Culture, (1990) pp. 15-69.Applicant

Kaufman, R. J. et al. “Improved vectors for stable expression of foreign genes in mammalian cells by use of the untranslated leader sequence from EMC virus” Nucleic Acids Res, (1991). 19:4485-4490.Applicant

Kaufman, R. J. “Vectors used for expression in mammalian cellls” Meth. in Enzymology, (1990). 185:487-511.Applicant

Li, W., et al. “Saturated Blast: an automated multiple intermediate sequence search used to detect distant homology” Bioinformatics, (2000) 16(12):1105-1110.Applicant

Luckow, V. A. and Max D. Summers “Trends in the development of baculovirus expression vectors” Bio/Technology, (1988). 6:47-55.Applicant

Newton, D. L., et al. “Angiogenin single-chain immunofusions: Influence of peptide linkers and spacers between fusion protein domains” Biochemistry, (1996). 35:545-553.Applicant

Pear, J. R., et al. “Isolation and characterization of a fruit-specific cDNA and the corresponding genomic clone from tomato” Plant Molecular Biology, (1989). 13:639-651.Applicant

Kaufman, R. J., “Selection and coamplification of heterologous genes in mammalian cells” Methods in Enzymology, (1990) 185, 537-566.Applicant

McDowell, R. S. and Thomas R. Gadek, “Structural studies of potent constrained RGD peptides” J. Amer. Chem. Soc., (1992). 114(24):9245-9253.Applicant

Wu, U. et al., eds., Recombinant DNA Methodology, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego (1989), pp. 189-196.Applicant

Saiki, R. K., et al. “Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase” Science, (1988). 239:487-491.Applicant

Sambrook, et al. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., (1989) chapters 9 and 11.Applicant

Schimke, R. T., et al. “Amplification of genes in somatic mammalian cells” Methods in Enzymology, (1987) 151:85-104.Applicant

Urlaub, G., et al. “Isoloation of Chinese hamster cell mutants deficient in dihydrofolate reductase activity” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, (1980) 77:4216-4220.Applicant

Ward, E. S., et al. “Binding activities of a repertoire of single immunoglobulin variable domains secreted from Escherichia coli” Nature, (1989). 341:544-546.Applicant

Whitlow, M., et al. “An improved linker for single-chain Fv with reduced aggregation and enhanced proteolytic stability” Protein Engineering, (1993) 6 (8):989-995.Applicant

Wootton, J. C. and Scott Federhen “Analysis of compositionally biased regions in sequence databases” Methods in Enzymol, (1996) 266:554-571.Applicant