Non-chlorinated concentrated all-in-one acid detergent and method for using the same

[0001] 1. Field of the Invention

[0002] The present invention is generally directed toward concentrated acid detergent compositions and methods of using the composition, either as a concentrate or as a diluted use solution, to clean, sanitize, and remove scale from a soiled surface. More particularly, the acidic detergent compositions according to the present invention comprise a fatty alkyl-1,3-diaminopropane or salt thereof and optionally a lower alkyl sulfonic acid.

[0003] 2. Description of the Prior Art

[0004] Adequate cleaning of food preparation surfaces is a necessity to ensure the safety of the food supplied to consumers. This is especially true for the dairy industry, food preparation and processing plants, including food and beverage plants, and particularly in the area of milk handling. Fresh milk must be immediately cooled and refrigerated after being obtained from the cow in order to prevent the milk from spoiling. Consequently, the piping systems which handle the flow of milk must be cleaned at least twice after each milking in order to remove milk soils so as to prevent contamination of the fresh milk supply during subsequent milking operations.

[0005] Turning now to FIG. 1, milk fat is made up of a wide distribution of alkyl triglycerides. Chain lengths labeled with a “:1”, “:2”, or “:3” represent a carbon chain containing one, two, or three unsaturated carbon-carbon bonds, respectively. The lower carbon chains (i.e., C8 and below) are generally water soluble. However, the higher carbon chains (i.e., C10 and above) are only slightly soluble or insoluble in water. Therefore, in order to clean a surface soiled with milk fat, ordinary warm water may be used to remove the lower carbon chain fats, while some kind of detergent is needed to assist with removal of the high carbon chain fats.

[0006] In addition to milk fat, milk also contains various soluble minerals (such as calcium) and proteins (such as casein and whey). Milk proteins at elevated temperatures tend to denature and tenaciously adhere to surfaces in layers. These layers of denatured milk protein are difficult to remove. The soluble minerals can combine with milk proteins to form scaling, also known as milk stone. Milk stone is generally insoluble in ordinary tap water and alkaline systems, but is soluble under acidic conditions. Conventionally, acid solutions of mineral acids and organic acids have been used to remove these scales.

[0007] Even if the milk fat, milk protein, and milk stone are removed from a surface, residual microorganisms may still be present on the surface. Therefore, some sanitization of the surface needs to be performed in order to reduce the level of microorganism populations to safe levels established by public health ordinances or levels proven acceptable by practice. A sanitized surface is, by Environment Protection Agency (EPA) regulation, a consequence of both an initial cleaning treatment followed with a sanitizing treatment resulting in a reduction in population of at least 99.999% reduction (a 5-log reduction) for a given microorganism. In order for a product to be certified under European Standard Method EN 1040 as a disinfectant or antiseptic, the product must demonstrate at least a 99.999% reduction (10⁵ reduction) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 15442, CIP 103467) and Staphylococcus auerus (ATCC 6538, CIP 483) at 20° C. for 5 minutes contact time at the product's recommended use concentration. Similarly, for a product to be certified under European Standard Method EN 1276, as a sanitizer for food contact surfaces, the product must demonstrate at least a 99.999% reduction (10⁵ reduction) in viable counts of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 15442, CIP 103467), Escherichia coli (ATCC 6538, CIP 54127), Staphylococcus auerus (ATCC 6538, CIP 483), and Enterococcus hirae (ATCC 10541, CIP 5855) at 20° C. for 5 minutes contact time at its recommended use concentration under simulated clean conditions (0.3g/L bovine albumin) or dirty conditions (3 g/L bovine albumin).

[0008] The presence of residual food soil can inhibit sanitizing treatments by acting as a physical barrier that shields microorganisms lying within the soil layer from the biocide or by inactivating sanitizing treatments by direct chemical interaction. A complete cleaning process must address all three cleansing elements (cleaning, sanitizing, and descaling) in order to provide a hygenic environment for all food processing surfaces, especially milk processing surfaces.

[0009] The technology of cleaning in the food process industry has traditionally been empirical. For example, most dairies employ the clean-in-place (CIP) method, involving the flushing of contaminated equipment surfaces with cleaning solution(s). For example, the equipment is rinsed with lukewarm (110-120° F.) water, followed by a hot wash using a chlorinated alkaline detergent at 160-175° F., and lastly a cold acidic rinse using a mineral acid based composition such as phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, and nitric acid based compositions.

[0010] Hypochlorite or chlorine bleaches are effective in degrading protein by oxidative cleavage and hydrolysis of the peptide bond. However, the use of chlorinated detergent solutions in the food processing industry is not problem-free. Corrosion is a constant concern, as is the degradation of polymeric gaskets, hoses, and appliances. Available chlorine concentrations must initially be at least 75 ppm, and preferably at least 100 ppm for an optimum removal of protein film (see, WO9947631). At concentrations of less than 50 ppm of available chlorine, protein soil build-up is worsened by formation of insoluble, adhesive chloro-proteins (see, Journal of Dairy Science, 53(2), 248-251, 1970). In Scandinavian countries, dairy farmers are able to obtain premium pricing for milk obtained with equipment that is not cleaned with chlorinated cleaning products.

[0011] Furthermore, chlorine concentrations are not easy to maintain or analytically discern in detersive solutions. The effectiveness of chlorine on protein soil removal diminishes as solution temperature and pH decreases. Also, chlorine can react with organic materials to form carcinogenic chlorocarbons, such as chloromethane, di- and trichloromethane, and chloroethane.

[0012] There exists a real and substantial need in the art for a non-chlorine, acidic detergent composition capable of cleaning, sanitizing, and descaling food preparation surfaces, particularly milking systems. In addition, there is a need for a detergent composition capable of performing all three cleansing processes (cleaning, sanitizing, and descaling) in a single step washing cycle.

[0013] The present invention overcomes the above problems and provides an “all-in-one” concentrated liquid detergent composition capable of cleaning, sanitizing, and descaling in a single step with one detergent. Compositions according to the present invention comprise a fatty alkyl-1,3-diaminopropane or salt thereof having the general formula R—NH—CH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂, wherein R is a substituted or unsubstituted, straight or branch, saturated or unsaturated C4-C22 alkyl group in an acid matrix. It is preferable that the R group correspond as closely as possible to the fatty alkyl group distribution of the soil being cleaned. Preferably, the fatty alkyl-1,3-diaminopropane is derived from natural sources, such as coconut, soy, tallow, or oleo sources. Preferred alkyl diaminopropane salts include acetate salts formed in situ by the addition of acetic acid to the alkyl diaminopropane.

[0014] The inventive detergent provides cleaning, sanitizing, and descaling functionality in a single composition. Preferred embodiments of the detergent composition also include a mixture of inorganic and organic acids which provide descaling and sanitizing action. Exemplary inorganic and organic acids are described in greater detail below. In addition, it is preferable to include sanitizing agents to enhance the sanitizing effect of the detergent composition. It is also preferable to include one or more additional ingredients such as surfactants, one or more sequesterants, builders, and chelating agents. It is also particularly preferable to include a quantity of a lower-alkyl sulfonic acid (such as methanesulfonic acid) to further enhance the cleaning performance of the detergent.

[0015] The detergent concentrate is capable of being diluted with water to form a use solution. Preferably, the concentrate is diluted at a weight ratio of between about 1:10 to 1:300, and more preferably between about 1:100 to 1:250. An exemplary use solution expressed in terms of volume of concentrate per total volume of solution is about 0.3-1.0 oz/gal. The pH of the concentrated detergent composition is less than about 4, preferably between about 0. 1-4, more preferably between about 0.75-3.5, and most preferably between about 1.0-2.5. Preferably, the pH of the diluted use solution is from about 0. 1-6.0, and more preferably from about 2.0-5.5.

[0016] The diaminopropane detergent may also include an acid active or acid resistant enzymes to give added cleaning functionality. Preferred enzymes for use with the present invention exhibit a high level of activity over the pH ranges noted above. Exemplary acid active or acid resistant enzymes are those selected from the group consisting of acid active or acid resistant protease enzymes, acid lipolase enzymes, lipase enzymes, acid resistant amylase enzymes, cellulase enzymes, acid peroxidase, and combinations thereof.

[0017] Because the present detergents are capable of being used with CIP systems, detergent foaming is undesirable and should be minimized as much as possible. In applications where foaming is not a concern high foaming surfactants may be used. However, preferred detergent formulations comprise a low foaming surfactant or surfactant system that tends to dissipate foam rapidly. As explained in greater detail below, a synergistic effect has been discovered from the use of at least two different surfactants. Foaming in certain detergents employing a dual surfactant system can be significantly less than foaming in detergents employing only one of the two individual surfactants. Therefore, the present invention provides a method of reducing the foaming of an acidic detergent through the addition of a fatty alkyl-1,3-diaminopropane or salt thereof to the detergent composition.

[0018] The detergents according to the present invention are useful in cleaning food processing plants, beverage plants, and food preparation surfaces, especially surfaces contaminated with milk soils. Methods of cleaning according to the invention generally comprise providing a detergent concentrate as described above and applying it to a surface. Preferably, the detergent concentrate is diluted prior to application to the surface to form a use solution. The detergents are particularly suited for use with recirculating cleaning systems (i.e., CIP systems) in food processing and beverage plants, especially milk-handling systems.

[0023] The following examples set forth preferred detergent compositions and methods of making and using the same in accordance with the invention. It is to be understood, however, that these examples are provided by way of illustration and nothing therein should be taken as a limitation upon the overall scope of the invention.

[0024] Many of the following examples involve cleaning evaluations of acid detergents according to the present invention. The cleaning efficacies of the samples were compared to those of commercially available chloro alkaline detergents. In these cleaning tests, 304 stainless steel, plastic, or glass panels measuring 3″×6″×0.0037″, having a ¼″ hole at one end were at first washed with a powder chloro-alkaline detergent, rinsed with water and wiped with xylene, then with isopropanol, followed by drying in an oven (100-110° C., for 10-15 minutes) to insure complete evaporation of the solvents. The panels were suspended in the oven by attaching a rigid wire hanger to the panel hole, so that no contact was made with the oven or other items within the oven. The dried panels were then removed from the oven, and allowed to cool for at least 20 minutes. The panels were then carefully handled so as to eliminate contact with soil sources, and the initial weight of each panel was recorded to the nearest 0.1 mg.

[0025] Evaporated milk was then emptied into to a 1 L beaker along with an equivalent volume of de-ionized water, and the mixture was stirred to insure homogeneity. Up to three panels were placed in the milk by setting the end without the hole on the bottom of the beaker and propping the other end of the panel against the side of the beaker. Approximately ⅞ of the panel was immersed in the milk. The panels were allowed to sit in the milk for 15 minutes and then drained in the air for 5 minutes. Each panel side was then rinsed with 50 ml of 400 ppm of synthetic hard water previously heated to 90-100° F. Care was taken to pour the rinse water over each side of the panel so as to contact all of the soiled areas of the panel. The rinse water was allowed to drain off each panel and then the panels were hung in a 40° C. oven to dry. The panels were then removed from the oven and allowed to cool for at least 15 minutes. After cooling, the panels were weighed and each weight was recorded to the nearest 0.1 mg. The soil deposition, rinsing, drying and weighing cycle was carried out a total of five times for each panel, or until the soil weight fell within the range of 10-15 mg.

[0026] The soiled panels were then washed in a 1 L beaker using the inventive detergents and the control products. Approximately 800 ml of synthetic hard water (23.5 grains/gal, 400 ppm of water hardness made by AOAC method) was placed in the beaker along with a specified amount of the detergent. All experimental detergents and all liquid controls were used at 0.5 wt % (i.e., 5 g/L concentration), whereas the powder chloroalkaline detergent was used at 0.2 wt % (2 g/L concentration). The cleaning solution was heated using a hot plate to a temperature of 60° C., unless otherwise specified. In some wash cycles, a stress wash condition was used by lowering the wash temperature to below 60° C. and/or reducing the washing time to less than 8 minutes.

[0027] Each test panel was first immersed in the detergent solution for a period of 8 minutes with agitation via a magnetic stir bar. After the wash, each panel was removed from the wash bath and immediately rinsed in tap water for about 5 seconds. The panel was then suspended within the 40° C. oven for a period of about 15 minutes to dry. The panel was removed from the oven, cooled in the air for about 30 minutes and then reweighed. The weight of the panel after the wash cycle was then compared with the soiled weight thereof before the wash cycle to determine the percent soil removed. Each wash trial was performed in triplicate and the results averaged to give a percent soil removed.

[0028] The liquid compositions of the present invention are acidic and comprise an organic or inorganic acid or both. The acids can be any organic or inorganic acids known to those skilled in the art, however, it is preferred to use a mixture of a weak and a strong organic acid (i.e., citric acid and methane sulfonic acid) and a weak and a strong inorganic acid (i.e., nitric, sulfuric, and phosphoric acid) or any such combination. The combination of citric and phosphoric acid and methane sulfuric acid, surprisingly, results in an increase in cleaning efficacy.

[0029] Preferred organic acids include weak C1 to C4 carboxylic acids. Exemplary weak carboxylic acids include acetic acid, hydroxyacetic acid, propionic acid, hydroxypropionic acid, a-ketopropionic acid, citric acid, butyric acid, mandelic acid, valeric acid, succinic acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, oxalic acid, fumaric acid, adipic acid or mixtures thereof.

[0030] Additional preferred organic acids for use in detergent formulations according to the present invention include citric acid, maleic acid, sorbic acid, benzoic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, α-hydroxy acids such as glycolic acid and lactic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), phosphonic acid, octyl phosphonic acid, acrylic acid, polyacrylic acid, aspartic acid, polyaspartic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acids, and combinations thereof. Citric acid is particularly preferred.

[0031] Other preferred organic acids suitable for use with inventive detergents are iminoacetic acids having the general formula

[0032]
wherein R¹ is selected from the group consisting of —(CH₂)_nCOOH, H, alkyl, alkylaryl, aryl, —(CH₂)_nCOOH, —CH[(CH₂)_nCOOH]₂ and —CH(COOH)—(CH₂)_nCOOH, where n is from 1-8; and R² is selected from the group consisting of —(CH₂)_nCOOH, —CH[(CH₂)_nCOOH]₂, —CH(COOH)—(CH₂)_nCOOH and —(CH₂)_nCOOH, —CH[(CH₂)_nCOOH]₂ and —CH(COOH)—CH₂ COOH, where n is from 1-8. Mixtures of such acids may be also used.

[0033] Yet additional preferred organic acids are those having the general formula R¹—SO₃H wherein R¹ is a Ci-C16 alkyl group.

[0034] Preferred inorganic acids include mineral acids such as sulfuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid, sulfamic acid, hydrochloric acid, and mixtures thereof. Sulfamic acids and phosphoric acids are also helpful in descaling soiled surfaces.

[0035] Preferably, the inventive detergent compositions comprise hydrotrope compatible acids in sufficient concentration to provide use solutions having a pH from about 0.1-6, more preferably from about 0.15-5, and most preferably from about 0.2-3. The term “hydrotrope compatible acid” means that the acid employed is compatible with the hydrotrope used in the composition without causing significant degradation or instability to the hydrotrope or acid. Exemplary hydrotrope compatible acids include citric acid, phosphoric acid, methanesulfonic acid and sulfamic acid. Phosphoric acid is particularly advantageous acid because it also provides some hydrotropic properties to solubilize nonionic surfactants that may be incorporated with the detergents. Phosphoric acid and sulfamic acid are also particularly advantageous for use in cleaning dairy pipelines as they tend to dissolve milk stone.

[0036] Preferred compositions according to the present invention comprise from about 1-80% by weight acid (either organic, inorganic, or a mixture of both), more preferably from about 5-70% by weight, even more preferably from about 10-60% by weight, and most preferably from about 15-50% by weight. Unless otherwise noted, all weight percentages expressed herein are based on the weight of the entire composition.

[0037] In the trials shown in Table 1, several acidic detergent formulations (having pH values of less than 3) were first tested for cleaning effectiveness because acidic conditions are a requirement for descaling. These compositions produced moderate cleaning of the milk soil, however, the control, a chloroalkaline detergent, out-performed the acidic formulations each time.

[0038]

TABLE 1
Acidic Detergent Formulations
Ingredients/Formulation	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
Deionized Water	59	62	63	59	39	40	42	41	40	36
Anhydrous Citric Acid	10	10	10	10	20	20	20	20	20	20
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	10	10	10	10	20	20	20	20	20	20
Sulfamic Acid	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	5	5	0
Sulfuric Acid	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5
Triton DF-12 (NI Surfactant)	1	1	0	1	1	0	1	2	3	3
Capric/Caprylic Acid (40/60)	2	2	2	0	2	2	2	2	2	2
Propylene Glycol	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Sodium Octyl Sulphonate	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	14
	Single	—	—	Single	Clear	—	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear
	Phase			Phase	Liquid		Liquid	Liquid	Liquid	Liquid
	Clear			Clear
	Liquid			Liquid
pH: 5 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	2.78(52)/	2.82(55)	2.77(53)	2.77(53)	2.37(52)/	2.37(53)	2.33(59)/	2.33(56)	2.34(55)	2.25(58)
	2.80(54)/				2.46(61,		2.34(66)
	2.77(53)				65)
Cleaning Performance
Usage Concentration, g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	56/57/58	57	55	56	56/60/71	55	60/71	61	59	59
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm,	79/83/73	94	97	86	89/84/88	96	85/86	87	90	77
%
Powder Chloroalkaline	96/99/100	100	100	100	100/94	100	94	94	94	94
Detergent Control @ 2 g/L, %
Average Milk Soil Load, mg	7/19	24	24	19	13/39/29	24	40	28	30	31
Soil Load on the Control, mg	11/20	26	24	20	20/26	24	26	26	26	26

[0039] In view of the acid detergent results, similar formulations were then tested using acid active or acid resistant enzymes to determine whether cleaning performance of the acid compositions could be improved upon. Enzymes present numerous advantages for use in cleaning detergents, especially in that they provide cleaning functionality at lower temperatures, are non-corrosive to stainless steel equipment, are relatively stable in hard water conditions, and are biodegradable. Enzymes are highly chemo-selective and work very efficiently if the working pH and temperature of the system can be matched to those of the enzyme to exploit their maximum activity. Therefore, with regard to the present invention, it is important to identify acid active or acid resistant protease enzymes that are effective against milk soils and are also stable in organic acids and inorganic acids that are used for sanitization and descaling.

[0040] An exemplary acid protease suitable for use with the detergents of the present invention is acid fungal protease AFP 2000 from Genencor which is derived from a selected strain of Aspergillus niger. The activity of AFP 2000 protease is about 2000 SAPU/g (Spectrometric Acid Protease Unit per gram). One SAPU will liberate one μmole of tyrosine per minute under assay conditions. This acid enzyme has a molecular weight of about 43 kDa and also includes side activities of amylase, hemicellulase, and pectinase. The pH activity range for AFP 2000 protease is from about 2.5 to 6.0, with optimum performance at about pH 3.0. AFP 2000 protease is effective over a temperature range of about 45-55° C. (113-131° F.), with optimum performance at about 48° C. (118° F.).

[0041] Another exemplary acid protease is Genencor's GC 106 which is an acid proteolytic enzyme characterized by its ability to hydrolyze proteins under low pH conditions. GC 106 is obtained from controlled fermentation of a selected strain of Aspergillus niger. The activity of GC 106 protease is about 1000 SAPU/g. The pH activity range for GC 106 protease is from about 2.5 to 6.0, with optimum performance at about pH 2.5 to 3.5. GC 106 protease is most effective in temperatures of up to about 55° C. (131° F.), with optimum performance at 45-50° C. (113-122° F.).

[0042] Validase AFP from Valley Research, South Bend, Ind., is a food-grade, acid stable protease enzyme derived from the controlled fermentation of Apergillus niger. This product is characterized by its ability to hydrolyze proteins in acidic environments. Validase AFP 2000 (powder form) has an activity of 2000 SAPU/g and Validase AFP 1000 (liquid form) has an activity of 1000 SAPU/g. The pH activity range for Validase AFP is from about pH 2.5 to 6.0, with about pH 2.5 to 3.5 being optimum. Validase AFP is effective in temperatures up to about 55° C., and optimally, from about 45-50° C.

[0043] Yet another preferred acid resistant protease enzyme is a fungal protease manufactured by Solvay Enzymes through controlled fermentation of Aspergillus oryzae var having an activity of about 20,000 to about 750,000 HUT/g. The HUT activity is determined according to the AF92/2 method published by Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark. A HUT is the amount of the enzyme which forms a hydrolysate at 40° C. and a pH of 4.7 over 30 minutes from the digestion of denatured hemoglobin equivalent in absorbency at 275 nm to a solution of 1.10 μg/ml tyrosine in 0.006 N HCl (absorbency=0.0084). The denatured hemoglobin substrate is digested by the enzyme in a 0.5 M acetate buffer at the given conditions. Undigested hemoglobin is precipitated with trichloroacetic acid and the absorbance of the hydrolysate in the supernatant is measured at 275 nm.

[0044] The preferred protease enzyme dosage for the present inventive compositions is from about 200-4,000 HUT/L, more preferably from about 500-3,000 HUT/L, and most preferably 650-2,000 HUT/L.

[0045] An acid lipolase or lipase may also be used in combination with an acid protease. Validase Fungal Lipase 8000 from Valley Research is a purified food grade lipase powder derived from a selected stain of Rhizopus orzaye (ATCC 1996) and is characterized by its ability to hydrolyze triglycerides. Validase Fungal Lipase 8000 has an activity of 8000 LU/g, is effective up to a temperature of about 50° C., with about 40° C. being optimal. Validase Fungal Lipase 8000 is a very stable over a wide pH range, from about 2.0-10.0, with a pH of about 6.5 being optimal.

[0046] Another preferred lipase for use with the present invention is a yeast lipase from Bio-Cat, Troy, Va. derived from the yeast Candida rugosa. This enzyme is a food-grade, non-specific lipase typically utilized for lipid modification. The yeast lipase is standardized to have an activity of about 200,000 FIP/g and has broad activity at pH between about 4 to 8 and temperatures between about 20 to 60° C. One unit of enzyme activity is defined as that quantity of a standard Lipase preparation (Fungi Lipase-International FIP standard) that liberates the equivalent of 1 μmole of fatty acid from olive oil per minute under the prescribed assay conditions. The specific activity is expressed in International FIP units per mg of enzyme preparation.

[0047] Acid resistant amylase enzymes may also be used in the present inventive formulations. These enzymes include α-amylases of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens having an activity of about 300,000 to 1,500,000 MWU/g, and particularly Tenase-1200, Tenase L-1200 and Tenase L-340 from Solvay Enzymes, Inc.

[0048] Other acid resistant enzymes suitable for acid detergent compositions according to the present invention are Fungamyl amylase, Novocor AD lipase, and cellulase enzymes such as Celluzyme, Carezyme, Cellucast; Guardzyme peroxidase, all available from Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark.

[0049] The detergent compositions can comprise up to about 20% by weight enzyme, preferably from about 0.5-10% by weight, and more preferably from about 1-8% by weight. Preferred enzymes are selected from the group consisting of acid protease, acid lipase, acid amylase, acid peroxidase and combinations thereof.

[0050] Tables 2-2c give exemplary enzymatic acid detergents in accordance with the present invention. The cleaning power of a number of the compositions was greatly improved when compared with the simple acidic detergents of Table 1.

[0051]

TABLE 2
Enzymatic Acid Detergents
Ingredients/Formulation	11	12	13	14	15
Deionized Water	62	86	62	83.33	82.33
Anhydrous Citric Acid	15	—	30	10	10
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	6	—	—	4	4
Sulfamic Acid	—	8	—	2.67	2.67
Triton DF-12 (NI Surfactant)	1	—	—	—	1
Capric/Caprylic Acid (40/60)	—	—	2	—	—
Sodium Octyl Sulphonate	10	—	—	—	—
Vallidase AFP 1000 SAPU(L)	6	6	6	6	6
pH: 5 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	2.92(57)	2.94(57)	2.82(57)	2.86(55)	2.89(57)
Cleaning Performance
Usage Concentration, g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	55	57	57	55	57
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm, %	84	86	84	86	93
Powder Chloroalkaline Detergent	92	92	92	92	92
Control @ 2 g/L, %
Average Milk Soil Load, mg	23	24	20	19	19
Soil Load on the Control, mg	26	23	23	23	23

[0052]

TABLE 2a
Enzymatic Acid Detergents
Ingredients/Formulation	16	17	18
Deionized Water	23	33	62
Anhydrous Citric Acid	20	20	10
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	20	20	10
Sulfamic Acid	0	0	0
Sulfuric Acid	0	0	0
Triton DF-12 (NI Surfactant)	2	2	1
Capric/Caprylic Acid (40/60)	10	5	2
Propylene Glycol	2	2	2
Sodium Octyl Sulphonate	18	13	10
Vallidase AFP 2000 SAPU(P)	5	5	3
Vallidase AFP 1000 SAPU(L)	—	—	—
pH: Neat (° C.)	1.17(21)	1.12(20)	1.28(20)
pH: 2 g/L (Deionized Water, ° C.)	—	2.57(22)	—
pH: 5 g/L (Deionized Water, ° C.)	—	—	2.47(21)
pH: 2 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	2.95(23)	2.80(22)	—
pH: 5 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	—	—	2.70(22)
pH: 1 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	3.96(53)	—	—
pH: 2 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	3.04(53)/	3.00(52)/	—
	2.99(49)	2.98(56)
pH: 5 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	—	—	2.84(55)/
			2.75(53)
Cleaning Performance	—	—	2.78(52)
Usage Concentration, g/L	1 g/L 2 g/L	2 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	55	55/56	57/55C/57
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm, %	44, 75, 80	95, 32	94, 47, 77
Dinamate Control @ 2 g/L, %	90%	97%, 99%	97%,
			99%,
			100%
Average Milk Soil Load, mg	—	11	13
Soil Load on the Control, mg	—	11	11
Ingredients/Formulation	19	20	21	22
Deionized Water	28	59	64	39
Anhydrous Citric Acid	20	10	10	20
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	20	10	10	20
Sulfamic Acid	0	0	0	0
Sulfuric Acid	0	0	0	0
Triton DF-12 (NI Surfactant)	2	1	1	1
Capric/Caprylic Acid (40/60)	5	2	0	2
Propylene Glycol	2	2	2	2
Sodium Octyl Sulphonate	13	10	10	10
Vallidase AFP 2000 SAPU(P)	—	—	3	—
Vallidase AFP 1000 SAPU(L)	10	6	—	6
pH: Neat (° C.)	—	—	—	—
pH: 2 g/L (Deionized Water,	—	—	—	—
° C.)
pH: 5 g/L (Deionized Water,	—	—	—	—
° C.)
pH: 2 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	2.80(22)	—	—	—
pH: 5 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	—	—	—	—
pH: 1 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	—	—	—	—
pH: 2 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	3.05(54)/	—	—	—
	2.96
pH: 5 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	—		2.78(59)	2.40(53)
Cleaning Performance	—		—	—
Usage Concentration, g/L	2 g/L		5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	57/55		54	56
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm, %	79, 68		86	92
Dinamate Control @ 2 g/L, %	96, 99		100	100
Average Milk Soil Load, mg	8		20	16
Soil Load on the Control, mg	11		20	20

[0053]

TABLE 2b
Enzymatic Acid Detergents
Ingredients/Formulation	23	24	25	26	27	28	29	30
Deionized Water	32	32	57	57	57	57	62	62
Anhydrous Citric Acid	10	10	15	10	5	15	5	10
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	10	10	5	10	15	5	10	5
Triton DF-12 (NI Surfactant)	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Capric/Caprylic Acid (40/60)	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Sodium Octyl Sulphonate	—	—	—	12	13.5	12	13.5	13.5
Sodium Xylene Sulphonate	35	35	36	—	—	—	—	—
CaCl2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Propylene Glycol	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Vallidase AFP 1000 SAPU(L)	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	6
pH: 5 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	2.84(53)	2.70(52)	3.01(53)	2.84(52)	2.71(52)	3.00(54)	3.00(53)	3.20(53)
Usage Concentration, g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	55	55	55	55	55	55	55	55
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm, %	79	84	64	74	87	70	77	58
Average Milk Soil Load, mg	35	31	34	35	35	34	32	30
Soil Load on the Control, mg	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

[0054]

TABLE 2c
Enzymatic Acid Detergents
Ingredients/Formulation	31	32	33	34	35	36	37	38	39	40
Deionized Water	73	74	73	74	73	73	68	74	69	75
Sulfamic Acid	5	5	5	5	5	0	5	5	0	0
Bronopal	0	0	2	2	0	0	2	2	0	0
Anhydrous Citric Acid	5	5	5	5	5	10	5	5	5	5
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	15	12	15	15	15	15	15	15	20	20
Glutaraldehyde (50%)	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	2	2
Triton DF-12 (NI Surfactant)	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	1	1	1
Capric/Caprylic Acid (40/60)	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Sodium Octyl Sulphonate	—	—	—	—	—	—	4	4	3	3
Vallidase AFP 1000 SAPU(L)	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	0	6	0
pH: 5 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	2.45(55)	2.45(55)	3.09(56)	2.45(55)	2.54(54)	2.66(55)	2.33(55)	2.31(56)	2.47(55)	2.41(56)
Usage Concentration, g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	56	56	57	57	56	56	56	56	56	56
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm,	88	86	93	92	96	100	85	86	97	87
%
Dinamate Control @ 2 g/L, %	—	—	—	—	—	—	97	97	97	97
Average Milk Soil Load, mg	22	22	21	21	25	20	17	19	17	16
Soil Load on the Control, mg	—	—	—	—	—	—	18	18	18	18

[0055] Fatty alkyl-1,3-diaminopropane, known also as alkyl-1,3-propylenediamine, alkyl-1,3-propylenediamine, and alkyl-1,3-trimethylenediamine are generally represented by the formula:
R—NH—CH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂
wherein R is a C4-C22 fatty alkyl radical, and more preferably a C8-C 18 fatty alkyl radical.

[0056] As shown in the following trials, it was discovered that adding a quantity of fatty alkyl-1,3-diaminopropane to the detergent formulations greatly enhanced the cleaning performance thereof in cleaning milk soil and especially in removing protein film. Furthermore, a relationship between the alkyl carbon chain distribution of the diaminopropane compositions and the milk soils cleaning efficiency was discovered. Table 3 shows the alkyl carbon chain distribution for a number of diaminopropane compositions in comparison to the distribution of alkyl carbon chains in milk fat. This comparison is also illustrated in FIG. 2 for several select diaminopropane compositions. It was discovered that the closer the alkyl carbon chain distribution of the diaminopropane composition was to that of milk fat, the more effective it was in cleaning milk soils. Therefore, the most preferred alkyl-1,3-diaminopropanes are those whose alkyl carbon chain distribution closely matches that of milk fat.

[0057]

TABLE 3
Alkyl Carbon Chains Distribution of Milk Fat/Protein and Fatty Alkyl-1,3-Diaminopropane
Alkyl Carbon Chain Distribution (% Weight)
										Total					Total	Theoretical
	C4	C6	C8	C10	C12	C14	C14:1	C16	C16:1	C16	C18	C18:1	C18:2	C18:3	C18	Match
Milk Fat Alkyl Carbon	2.8	2.3	1.1	3	2.9	8.9	0.7	24	1.8	25.8	13	29.6	2.1	0.5	45
Chain
Duomeen C (Coco			6	7	51	19		9		9	2	6			8	No
Alkyl)
Duomeen CD (Coco			1	5	54	21		11		11	4	5			9	No
Alkyl)
Duomeen O (Oleo					0.5	1.5	0.5	4	4	8	17	69	4		89.5	Borderline
Alkyl)																Yes
Duomeen OL (Oleo					0.5	1.5	0.5	5	5	10	8	77	3		88	Borderline
Alkyl)																Yes
Duomeen S (Soya						0.2		12	0.2	12.2	19	60	3		82	Borderline
Alkyl)																Yes
Duomeen T (Tallow						3	0.5	29	2	31	25	38	1.5		64.5	Yes
Alkyl)
Duomac T (Tallow						3	0.5	29	2	31	25	38	1.5		64.5	Yes
Alkyl Diacetates)
Genamin TAP 100 D						3		29		29	63				63	Yes
(Tallow Alkyl)
Genamin SHP 100						3		29		29	63				63	Yes
(Stearyl Alkyl)
Genamin LAP 100 D				4	72	21		4		4						No
(Lauro Alkyl)
Genamin OLP 100					2	3		18		18	76				76	Yes
(Oleo Alkyl)

[0058] The carbon chain distribution of alkyl groups in milk fat and milk protein ranges from C4 to C18 with the three major components being C14 (9%), C16 (26%), and C18 (45%). When the carbon chain distribution of alkyl groups of milk soil is superimposed along with various diaminopropane compositions as shown in FIG. 2, the coco group falls outside the milk distribution, whereas the oleo, soya and tallow varieties of fatty alkyl-1,3-diaminopropanes fit very well. Based on this matching similarity in carbon chain distribution, it was expected that these matching 1,3-diaminopropane materials would be highly effective in cleaning milk fat and protein soils. Laboratory cleaning data confirmed the theoretical predictions. The coco-derived 1,3-diaminopropane and its corresponding acetate salt performed acceptably, however, the soya, oleo, and tallow-based 1,3-diaminopropanes and their acetate salts were shown to even further enhance the cleaning performance of the detergent.

[0059] It was discovered that even when added in relatively small quantities, the detergents provided excellent cleaning, even outperforming chloroalkaline detergents at temperatures as low as 40° C. Preferably, the amount of alkyl-1,3-diamiopropane present in the acidic detergent compositions ranges from about 0.01-15% by weight alkyl-1,3-diaminopropane, more preferably from about 0.075-10% by weight, even more preferably from about 0.10-8% by weight, and most preferably from about 0. 15-6% by weight.

[0060] Fatty alkyl-1,3-diaminopropanes can be used as amines or can be converted into diamine salts through a reaction with low alkyl carbon acids such as formic acid, acetic acid, or any other organic acids. Mono and diacetate salts of fatty alkyl-1,3-propylenediamines (alone or in combination) are particularly preferred. The mono and diacetate salts are prepared in situ by mixing of the amines with controlled amounts of acetic acid prior to adding any other ingredients.

[0061] Preferred diaminopropane compositions are commercially available from Akzo Nobel under the name DUOMEEN. The DUOMEEN family includes Duomeen® C (Coco Alkyl), Duomeen® CD (Distilled Coco Alkyl), Duomeen® S (Soya Alkyl), Duomeen® SV (Soya Alkyl vegetable derived), Duomeen® O (Oleo Alkyl), Duomeen® OL (Oleo Alkyl), Duomeen® T (Tallow Alkyl). These compositions are also available as diacetate salts, a neutralized product formed with acetic acid, such as Duomac® T (Tallow Alkyl diacetate salts) and Armohib® B-101. Additional diaminopropane compositions are available from Clariant under the name GENAMIN and includes Genamin® OLP 100 (Oleyl propylenediamine), Genamin® TAP 100 (Tallow Alkyl propylenediamine), Genamin® TAP 100 D (Tallow Alkyl propylenediamine, distilled), Genamin® LAP 100 (Lauryl propylenediamine). Yet additional diaminopropane compositions are available from Corsicana Techlonogies under the name CORSAMINE, such as Corsamine® DC (Coco Alkyl), Corsamine® DO (Oleyl Alkyl), and Corsamine® DT (Tallow Alkyl).

[0062] Table 4 demonstrates the cleaning efficacy of detergent formulations comprising both acidic enzymes and fatty alkyl diaminopropane compositions. As the data shows, these compositions were highly effective in cleaning milk soils.

[0063]

TABLE 4
Detergent Formulations Comprising Enzyme and Fatty Alkyl Diaminopropane
Ingredients/Formulation	41	42	43	44	45	46	47
Deionized Water	73	74	70	71	74	77	71
Duomeen CD	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Acetic Acid	—	—	2	1	1	1	1
Sulfamic Acid	5	5	5	5	5	5	0
Anhydrous Citric Acid	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	15	15	15	15	15	15	20
Triton DF-12 (NI Surfactant)	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Vallidase AFP 1000	6	6	6	6	3	0	6
SAPU(L)
PH: Neat	—	—	1.07	1.02	—	—	1.18
pH: 5 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	2.52(56)	2.53(55)	2.41(54)	2.44(56)	2.42(56)	2.38(56)	2.52(55)
Usage Concentration, g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	58	56	54	56/58	57	57	55
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm, %	100	98	94	96/92	92	92	95
Powder Chloroalkaline	—	—	92	92/97	97	97	92
Detergent Control @ 2 g/L, %
Average Milk Soil Load, mg	24	24	28	27/21	19	24	25
Soil Load on the Control, mg	—	—	25	25/18	18	18	25
Ingredients/Formulation	48	49	50	51	52	53	54
Deionized Water	71	72	73	74	75	76	77
Duomeen CD	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Acetic Acid	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Sulfamic Acid	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Anhydrous Citric Acid	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	15	15	15	15	15	15	15
Triton DF-12 (NI Surfactant)	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Vallidase AFP 1000	6	5	4	3	2	1	0
SAPU(L)
PH: Neat	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
pH: 5 g/L (400 ppm, ° C.)	2.31(55)	2.31(55)	2.32(57)	2.32(56)	2.33(56)	2.33(58)	2.33(58)
Usage Concentration, g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	55	55	57	56	57	56	56
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm, %	92	93	90	92	88	90	88
Powder Chloroalkaline	95	95	95	95	95	95	95
Detergent Control @ 2 g/L, %
Average Milk Soil Load, mg	26	29	22	24	23	26	26
Soil Load on the Control, mg	32	32	32	32	32	32	32

[0064] Surfactants are important ingredients in detergents because they impart beneficial properties to the detergents, such as wetting, lowering surface tension, and cleaning assistance. However, many surfactants tend to foam when agitated. In CIP systems, because it is desirable to create as short a wash time as possible, excessive or long lasting foam is highly undesirable. CIP systems are particularly prone to foaming due to the agitation and slug action of the cleaning detergents. Also, protein soils, in general, naturally tend to produce foam. Therefore, it is important in the context of these systems to select surfactants which are non-foaming or very low foaming.

[0065] The preferred surface active agents used with the present detergent formulations include anionic, nonionic, cationic, amphoteric, and zwitterionic surfactants, or mixtures thereof and are stable in highly acidic conditions and in the presence of oxidants such as oxygen bleach and especially peroxide and peroxy acid bleach. Particularly preferred water soluble organic anionic surfactants include amine oxide, phosphine oxide, sulphoxide, sulfonate, sulfate, and betaine surfactants. One especially preferred class of anionic surfactants include the linear or branched alkali metal mono- and/or di-(C8-C14) alkyl diphenyl oxide mono- and/or disulfonates, available from Dow Chemical Company under the name DOWFAX. Other preferred anionic surfactants include the primary alkyl sulfates, alkyl sulfonates, arylalkylsulfonates and secondary alkylsulfonates. Exemplary anionic surfactants include sodium (C10-C18) alkylsulfonates such as sodium dodecylsulfonate, sodium alkylsulfonates such as sodium hexdecyl-1-sulfonate, and sodium (C12-C18) alkylbenzenesulfonates such as sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate. The corresponding potassium salts of the foregoing can also be used.

[0066] Nonionic surfactants tend to lower the detergent surface tension, improve the wettability of the surface being cleaned, and solubilize the soils in the inventive detergents. Preferred nonionic surfactants include capped or uncapped poly-lower alkoxylated higher alcohols or ether derivatives thereof, in which the alcohol or ether contains 9 to 18 carbon atoms and the number of moles of lower alkylene oxide (2 or 3 carbon atoms) is from 3 to 12.

[0067] Exemplary alkyl alkoxylated alcohols or ethers suitable for use with the present invention include the water soluble or dispersible nonionic surfactants from BASF under the name PLURAFAC (Fatty alcohol alkoxylates), and LUTENOL (fatty alcohol ethoxylates). These surfactants generally comprise the reaction product of a higher linear alcohol and a mixture of propylene and ethylene oxides. Specific examples include a (C13-C15) fatty alcohol condensed with 6 moles of ethylene oxide and 3 moles of propylene oxide and a (C13-C15) fatty alcohol condensed with 7 moles of propylene oxide and 4 moles of ethylene oxide.

[0068] Preferred PLURAFAC surfactants include Plurafac® LF-303 (polyglycol ether), Plurafac® LF-305 (C8-C14 alkyl chain), Plurafac® S-305LF, Plurafac® SLF-18B (C6-C10 ethoxylated linear alcohol), Plurafac® SLF-18B45, Plurafac® LF-4030. Other exemplary nonionic surfactants include those by Shell Chemical Company under the name NEODOL. These surfactants are condensation products of a mixture of higher fatty alcohols averaging about 12 to 15 carbon atoms with about 6-7 moles of ethylene oxide. Yet additional exemplary nonionic surfactants include those from Union Carbide under the names TERGITOL and TRITON, and the low foaming, biodegradable alkoxylated linear fatty alcohols by BASF under the name POLY-TERGENT.

[0069] Other exemplary surfactants that may be used in the present invention are the alkylpolysaccharide surfactants having a hydrophobic group containing from about 8-20 carbon atoms. Preferably, these surfactants comprise from about 10 to 16 carbon atoms (about 12-14 most preferably) and from about 1.5-10 saccharide units (i.e, fructosyl, glucosyl and galactosyl units and mixtures thereof). Preferred alkylpolysaccharide surfactants for use with the present invention include alkylpolyglucoside surfactants by Henkel Corporation under the name APG. These APG surfactants are characterized by the general formula (C_nH_2n+1)O(C₆H₁₀O₅)_xH.

[0070] Cationic surfactants for use with the present invention include those comprising amino or quaternary ammonium hydrophilic moieties that are positively charged when dissolved in the inventive detergents. Preferred quaternary ammonium surfactants are quaternary ammonium salts including dialkyldimethylammonium chlorides and trialkylmethylammonium chlorides, wherein the alkyl groups comprise from about 10-22 carbon atoms and are derived from long chain fatty acids, such as hydrogenated tallow fatty acids, coconut fatty acids, oleo fatty acids, soya fatty acids. Exemplary quaternary ammonium salts include ditallowdimethylammonium chloride and ditallowmethylammonium chloride. Salts of primary, secondary, and tertiary fatty amines may also be used as the cationic surfactant in the inventive detergents. Preferably, the alkyl groups of such amines comprise from about 10-22 carbon atoms and may be substituted or unsubstituted. Secondary and tertiary amines are particularly preferred, with tertiary amines being most preferred. Exemplary amines include stearamidopropyldimethyl amine, diethylaminoethyl stearamide, dimethyl stearamine, myristyl amine, and ethoxylated stearylamine. Preferably, the amine salts are selected from the group consisting of halogen, acetate, phosphate, nitrate, citrate, lactate and alkyl sulfate amine salts.

[0071] Amphoteric surfactants for use with the present invention include those broadly described as derivatives of aliphatic secondary and tertiary amines in which the aliphatic radical is straight or branched chain and wherein one of the aliphatic radicals comprises from about 6-18 carbon atoms and another of the aliphatic radicals includes an anionic hydrophilic group such as a carboxylate, sulfonate, sulfate, phosphate, or phosphonate. Exemplary amphoteric surfactants include sodium 3-decylaminopropionate, sodium 3-decylaminopropane sulfonate, sodium lauryl sarcosinate, and N-alkyltaurines such as those derived from dodecylamine and sodium isethionate.

[0072] Zwitterionic surfactants for use with the present invention include those derived from aliphatic quaternary ammonium, phosphonium, and sulfonium compounds, in which the aliphatic radicals are straight or branched chain, and wherein at least one of the aliphatic groups contains from about 8-18 carbon atoms and one anionic group selected from carboxylate, sulfonate, sulfate, phosphate, or phosphonate.

[0073] Preferably, compositions according to the present invention comprise from about 0-15% by weight of a surfactant, more preferably from about 0.10-15% by weight, even more preferably from about 0.50-10% by weight, still more preferably from about 1.0-8% by weight, and most preferably, from about 2-6% by weight. Mixtures of two or more surface active agents may be used in the inventive detergent compositions, and as explained below, such multiple surfactant systems are preferred.

[0074] Table 5 sets forth several diaminopropane detergent formulations including various preferred surfactants.

[0075]

TABLE 5
Fatty Alkyl Diaminopropane Detergent Formulations with Added Surfactant(s)
Ingredients/Formulations	55	56	57	58	59	60	61	62	63	64	65	66	67
Deionized Water	38	27	46.5	48	45	46	46	48	48	48	47	47	47
Acetic Acid	—	—	1.5	—	1	1	1	—	—	—	—	—	—
Duomeen T	—	—	—	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Duomeen O	—	—	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Duomeen S	—	—	—	—	2	2	2	—	—	—	—	—	—
Plurafac SLF-18B	2	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Plurafac LF-303	—	—	—	2	2	1	—	—	2	—	—	3	—
Plurafac S-305LF	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	—	—	—	3	—	—
Plurafac LF-305	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2	—	2	—	—	3
Plurafac LF-4030	—	—	3	—	—	2	2	—	—	—	—	—	—
Anhydrous Citric Acid	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid (85%)	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43
Sodium Octyl Sulphonate	9	21	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Sodium Hydrogen	5	2	—	—	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Sulphate
Ventocil P (20%)	—	2	—	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Phase/Homogeneity	1 Phase	1 Phase	1 Phase	2 Phase	2 Phase	2 Phase	2 Phase	2 Phase	1 Phase	1 Phase	2 Phase	1 Phase	1 Phase
Cleaning Performance, %	99.3	98.3	99.7	99.3	98.6	98.7	99.1	—	—	—	—	—	—
Germicidal Efficacy,
EN1040
Pseudomonas (0.5%,	P	P	P	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5 log)
Staph. Aureus (0.5%,	1%	2%	2%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5 log)

[0076] Detergent foaming is a concern especially for systems in which quick cleaning and rinsing cycles are important, particularly CIP systems having wash cycles of about 6-8 minutes. A series of trials were performed in order to optimize the level of foaming associated with the detergent formulations (i.e., reduce the level of foaming as much as possible).

[0077] The foaming trials were performed in a dynamic environment using a calibrated 500 cc tall gas washing bottle fitted with a fritted glass gas dispersion tube and cap (Corning 31770 F-34 Series), a F&P Precision Bore Flowrator Tube #01-150/S-51801, and a GE model 5KH32EG115X air pump. Flexible tubing was connected from the outlet of the air pump through the flowrator tube and into the inlet of the fritted glass gas dispersion tube. The detergent solution was prepared and 100 mL was decanted into the calibrated gas washing bottle and capped off. The air pump was set for a flow rate of 2.0 L/min and activated for 15 seconds. The initial net volume of foam (total volume minus the volume of liquid) was recorded. Measurements were periodically taken until complete foam collapse was achieved.

[0078] The tests were performed using both 400 ppm hard water (HD) and deionized water (DIW). Initially, a variety of single and dual surfactant systems were tested. These results are shown in Tables 6-8. As used herein, DNMC stands for dynamic foam height measured in mL in a dynamic foam height measurement.

[0079]

TABLE 6
Fatty Alkyl Diaminopropane Detergent Formulations with Single and Dual Surfactant
Ingredients	68	69	70	71	72	73	74	75	76
Deionized Water	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43
Acetic Acid	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Duomeen S	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Plurafac LF-303	—	—	—	—	—	2	—	—	—
Triton DF-12	—	—	2	—	—	—	—	2	—
Tergitol MDS-42	—	—	—	2	—	—	—	—	2
Plurafac LF-4030	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Plurafac SLF-18B	—	—	—	—	2	—	—	—	—
Plurafac LF-305	4	—	2	2	2	2	2	—	—
Plurafac S-305LF	—	4	—	—	—	—	2	2	2
Anhydrous Citric Acid	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43
(85%)
Sodium Octyl	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Sulfonate
Lactic Acid	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Homogeneity-Initial	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear
Two Days/Ambient	Clear	Floc	Haze	Floc	Clear	Floc	Haze	Floc	Floc
Cleaning %, 4-Min/	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	98.0/36.6
40° C./Control
Foam Vol + 300 mL 40° C.
DNMC-Deionized	230-40	180-10	240-40	240-40	300-50	290-60	300-30	280-20	330-10
Water
(0-5 min)
	340-50	400-0	430-30	430-40	390-60	390-110	410-40	400-20	390-0/4.3
DNMC-HD Water	250-50	230-3.5	250-40	280-40	330-70	310-40	330-40	340-30	370-0/3.3
(0-5 min)
	330-60	340-4.3	420-50	400-30	340-150	290-50	420-30	410-20	350-0/3.5
Ingredients	77	78	79	80	81	82	83	84
Deionized Water	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43
Acetic Acid	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Duomeen S	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Plurafac LF-303	—	2	2	4	—	—	—	—
Triton DF-12	—	—	—	—	2	4	—	—
Tergitol MDS-42	—	—	—	—	—	—	2	4
Plurafac LF-4030	—	—	2	—	2	—	2	—
Plurafac SLF-18B	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Plurafac LF-305	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Plurafac S-305LF	2	2	—		—	—	—	—
Anhydrous Citric	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Acid
Phosphoric Acid	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43
(85%)
Sodium Octyl	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Sulfonate
Lactic Acid	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Homogeneity-Initial	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear
Two Days/Ambient	Floc	Haze	Clear	Floc	Clear	Clear	Cleaar	Floc
Cleaning %, 4-	—	97.0/36.6	—	—	—	—	—	—
Min/40° C./Control
Foam Vol + 300 mL 40° C.
DNMC-DI Water	340-30	330-1.5	260-130	160-30	260-50	300-40	340-90	290-30
(0-5 min)
	370-30	340-2.8	260-140	220-20	320-60	310-30	320-60	280-50
DNMC-HD Water	350-40	340-2.0	250-130	190-20	300-110	340-40	340-190	370-40
(0-5 min)
	400-40	370-3.0	300-170	240-20	310-140	320-40	290-120	300-30
Ingredients	85	86	87	88	89	90	91	92
Deionized Water	42	43	43	43	43	43	43	43
Acetic Acid	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Duomeen S	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Plurafac LF-303	2	2	—	—	—	2	—	—
Triton DF-12	2	—	2	—	—	—	2	—
Tergitol MDS-42	—	2	2	—	—	—	—	2
Plurafac LF-4030	—	—	—	2	—	—	—	—
Plurafac SLF-18B	—	—	—	2	4	2	2	2
Plurafac LF-305	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Plurafac S-305LF	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Anhydrous Citric Acid	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid (85%)	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43
Sodium Octyl Sulfonate	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Lactic Acid	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Homogeneity-Initial	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear
Two Days/Ambient	Haze	Floc	Haze	Clear	Clear	Floc	Clear	Haze
Cleaning %, 4-Min/	—	95.8/36.6	—	—	—	—	—	—
40° C./Control
Foam Vol + 300 mL 40° C.
DNMC-DI Water	350-50	340-3.5	420-40	380-190	400-360	280-130	290-30	280-200
(0-5 min)
	310-40	230-3.0	310-30	300-150	300-200	220-90	280-30	240-190
DNMC-HD Water	380-20	350-2.0	420-20	370-160	360-300	310-50	310-40	260-170
(0-5 min)
	380-96	260-2.0	310-30	320-140	300-180	230-40	260-40	230-120

[0080]

TABLE 7
Fatty Alkyl Diaminopropane Detergent Formulations with Single Surfactant
Ingredients/Formulations	93	94	95	96	97	98	99	100	101
Deionized Water	50	48	47	45	44	42.5	46	43	46.5
Acetic Acid	—	—	1	1	1	1.5	—	1	1.5
Duomeen CD	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Duomeen O	—	—	2	2	2	3	—	—	3
Duomac T (Diacetates)	2	2	—	—	—	—	3	3	—
Plurafac SLF-18B45	—	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Sodium Octane Sulfonate	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Citric Acid (Anhydrous)	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid (85%)	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43
Sodium Bisulfate	—	2	2	2	2	2	—	2	—
Ventocil P	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	—
Plurafac LF-4030	—	—	—	2	3	3	3	3	3
Cleaning % (8 Min @ 60° C.)	99.5	98.8	99.9	99.7	98.9	99.7	99.5	99.8	99.7
Foam mL, 40° C.(0-20 min),	245-224	249-125	300-285	155-140	150-140	195-175	155-110	145-130	320-185
DIW
Foam mL, 40° C.(0-20 min),	260-225	230-195	320-310	225-200	200-195	220-190	220-130	155-130	320-185
DIW
Foam mL, 22° C.(0-20 min),	200-175	225-175	235-220	145-125	185-150	185-150	150-125	145-125	315-220
DIW
Foam mL, 22° C.(0-20 min),	200-180	210-165	280-275	175-160	225-180	215-180	190-150	165-135	295-200
DIW

[0081]

TABLE 8
Evaluation of Fatty Alkyl Diaminopropane Detergents With Defoaming Non-ionic Surfactants
Ingredients/Formulations	102	103	104	105	106	107
Deionized Water	45	45	48	48	45	45
Acetic Acid	1	1	—	—	1	1
Duomeen CD	2	2	—	—	—	—
Duomac T	—	—	2	2	—	—
(Diacetates)
Duomeen O	—	—	—	—	2	2
Duomeen OL	—	—	—	—	—	—
Duomeen S	—	—	—	—	—	—
Duomeen T	—	—	—	—	—	—
Plurafac LF-303	2	—	2	—	2	—
Plurafac S-305 LF	—	2	—	2	—	2
Citric Acid	3	3	3	3	3	3
(Anhydrous)
Phosphoric Acid	43	43	43	43	43	43
(85%)
Sodium Bisulfate	2	2	—	—	2	2
Ventocil P	2	2	2	2	2	2
D. Foam mL, 40° C.	880-820	860-820	860-460	860-450	890-850	870-820
(0-5 min), DIW
Ingredients/Formulations	108	109	110	111	112	113
Deionized Water	45	45	45	45	45	45
Acetic Acid	1	1	1	1	1	1
Duomeen CD	—	—	—	—	—	—
Duomac T	—	—	—	—	—	—
(Diacetates)
Duomeen O	—	—	—	—	—	—
Duomeen OL	2	2	—	—	—	—
Duomeen S	—	—	2	2	—	—
Duomeen T	—	—	—	—	2	2
Plurafac LF-303	2	—	2	—	2	—
Plurafac S-305 LF	—	2	—	2	—	2
Citric Acid	3	3	3	3	3	3
(Anhydrous)
Phosphoric Acid	43	43	43	43	43	43
(85%)
Sodium Bisulfate	2	2	2	—	2	—
Ventocil P	2	2	2	2	2	—
D. Foam mL, 40° C.	900-860	890-850	870-830	770-720	870-810	880-840
(0-5 min), DIW

[0082] Based on the above results, it was noted that for some of the detergent formulations using a dual surfactant system, the foaming was less than compared with single surfactant systems of either of the two surfactant components. This principle was tested and it was surprisingly and unexpectedly discovered that a synergistic defoaming action was achieved using two nonionic surfactants.

[0083] FIGS. 3 and 4 depict exemplary dual surfactant systems which show that not only does the foam disappear in less total time, the initial foam dissipation occurs more rapidly. FIG. 3 shows three exemplary detergent formulations: one comprising 4% Plurafac® LF-303, one comprising 4% Plurafac® S305 LF, and one comprising 2% of both the former and the latter. In a dynamic foam test at atemperature of 40° C. using a 0.5% concentration of detergent in hard water, the foam reduction time with the dual surfactant system is almost half of that of either of the single surfactant detergents. The trial shown in FIG. 4 was almost identical as that of FIG. 3 except that the Plurafac® S305-LF was replaced with Tergitol® MDS-42. In this trial, the foam reduction time for the dual surfactant system was more than cut in half when compared to the single surfactant detergents. Therefore, a synergy of lowering foam forms when a mixture of two surfactants were used in acid cleaners.

[0084] Tables 9-10 depict several preferred dual surfactant detergents in accordance with the present invention.

[0085] In addition, several formulations noted in Table 10 comprise the lower alkanesulfonic acid methanesulfonic acid, CH₃SO₃H. Methanesulfonic acid is a strong organic acid (pKa=−1.9) distinguished by a particularly high capacity for solvating numerous heavy metals. It was discovered that the addition of methanesulfonic acid to the detergent formulations greatly improved the cleaning performance of the detergent, especially in removing protein films. Methanesulfonic acid and its metal salts are highly soluble in water, and less corrosive than other strong inorganic acids. Methanesulfonic acid is biodegradable and recyclable. Methanesulfonic acid is generally less toxic than fluoroboric acid and fluorosilicic acid.

[0086] Methanesulfonic acid in aqueous solution assists in solubilizing of metal salts and surface active agents and has a low tendency to oxidize organic compounds.

[0087] Other lower alkyl (C₁-C₁₆) carbon chain sulfonic acids may be used in the inventive detergent formulations. In addition to methanesulfonic acid, other preferred lower alkyl sulfonic acids include ethanesulfonic acid, propanesulfonic acid, and butanesulfonic acid.

[0088] Preferably, acid detergent compositions in accordance with the present invention comprise between about 0-40% by weight of a lower alkyl sulfonic acid, more preferably from about 1-30% by weight, even more preferably from about 2-25% by weight, and most preferably from about 5-20% by weight.

[0089]

TABLE 9
Fatty Alkyl Diaminopropane Detergent Formulations with Dual Surfactant
Ingredients/Formulations	114	115	116	117	118	119	120	121	122	123	124	125
Deionized Water	37	37	37.5	37.5	36.5	36.5	36	36	37.5	37	36.5	36
Acetic Acid	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Duomeen S	1	1	0.5	0.5	1.5	1.5	2	2	0.5	1	1.5	2
Plurafac LF-303	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	—	—	—	—
Tergitol MDS-42	2	—	2	—	2	—	2	—	2	2	2	2
Plurafac S-305LF	—	2	—	2	—	2	—	2	2	2	2	2
Anhydrous Citric Acid	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4
Phosphoric Acid (85%)	50	50	50	50	50	50	50	50	50	50	50	50
Lactic Acid	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Homogeneity-Initial	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear
Two Days/Ambient T	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear

[0090]

TABLE 9a
Fatty Alkyl Diaminopropane Detergent Formulations with Dual Surfactant
Ingredients/Formulations	126	127	128	129	130	131	132	133	134
Deionized Water	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43
Acetic Acid	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Duomeen S	1	1	2	2	1.5	1.5	2	1	1
Plurafac LF-303	1	3	2	1	1.5	2	1.5	2	4
Tergitol MDS-42	3	1	1	2	2	1.5	1.5	2	—
Plurafac S-30LF	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Anhydrous Citric Acid	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid (85%)	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43
Lactic Acid	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Homogeneity-Initial	1 Phase	1 Phase	1 Phase	1 Phase	1 Phase	1 Phase	1 Phase	1 Phase	1 Phase
Homogeneity-Two Days	Haze	Top Ppt	Top Ppt	Top Ppt	Top Ppt	Top Ppt	Top Ppt	Top Ppt	Top Ppt
Foam Vol + 300 mL 40° C.	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
DNMC-DI Water (0-5 min),	190-10	140-0/3.50	220-10	250-0/1.66	38086	38106	290-20	340-0/3.45	160-30
end time in min	190-20	150-10	—	230-0/1.50	—	—	—	230-0/3.00	220-20
indicates point of total	240-30	150-0/2.33	190-20	150-0/1.00	170-20	210-30	240-20	230-0/2.83	—
foam collapse	—	—	—	160-0/1.00	—	—	—	—	—
DNMC-HD Water (0-5 min),	200-0/3.00	200-0/2.50	310-30	280-0/3.00	250.0/3.00	250-0/4.00	310-40	350-0/2.00	190-20
end time in min	190-0/2.50	280-0/3.50	—	—	270-0/3.00	—	—	260-0/2.00	240-20
indicates point of total	210-0/2.70	210-0/2.00	240-20	210-0/1.75	190-0/1.50	190-0	220-40	200-30	—
foam collapse	—	—	—	—	190-0/2.33	—	—	—	—

[0091]

TABLE 10
Fatty Alkyl Diaminopropane Detergents with Dual Surfactants
Ingredients/Formulation
Sequence	135	136	137	138	139	140
Deinoized Water	23.85	27.1	31.1	33.35	21.85	27.1
Acetic Acid	1	0.25	0.25	0.25	1	0.25
Genamin TAP 100D	—	—	—	—	—	—
Genamin OLP	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15
Plurafac LF-303	1.5	1	1	1	1.5	1
Plurafac SLF-18B	—	—	—	—	—	—
Plurafac S-305LF	—	—	—	—	0	0
Plurafac LF-305	0	0	1.5	1.5	—	—
Plurafac LF-18B45	1.5	1.5	0	0	1.5	1.5
Anhydrous Citric Acid	3	0	0	0	3	0
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	35	30	30	30	35	30
Food Grade
Sodium Xylene Sulfonate	28	32	24	22	30	32
(40%)
Methane Sulfonic Acid	0	5	8	8	0	5
(70%)
Capric/Caprylic Acid	3	3	1	0.75	3	3
(40/60)
Propylene Glycol-Technical	3	0	0	0	3	0
Grade
Glycolic Acid (Hydroxy	0	0	3	3	0	0
Acetic Acid)
Product Homogeneity	—	—	—	—	Clear	Clear
pH: Neat	—	—	—	—	—	—
Sp. Gravity (23.6° C.), g/mL	—	—	—	—	—	—
Ingredients/
Formulation
Sequence	141	142	143	144	145	146
Deinoized Water	25.1	21.35	28.1	29.6	30.1	32.6
Acetic Acid	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25
Genamin TAP 100D	—	—	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15
Genamin OLP	0.15	0.15	—	—	—	—
Plurafac LF-303	1	1	1	1	1	1
Plurafac SLF-18B	—	—	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5
Plurafac S-305LF	1.5	1.5	—	—	—	—
Plurafac LF-305	—	—	—	—	—	—
Plurafac LF-18B45	0	0	—	—	—	—
Anhydrous	0	0	0	0	0	0
Citric Acid
Phosphoric Acid	30	36	30	26	22	18
(75%)
Food Grade
Soidum Xylene	30	28	31	32	34	34
Sulfonate
(40%)
Methane Sulfonic	8	8	5	6.5	8	9.5
Acid (70%)
Capric/Caprylic	1	0.75	3	3	3	3
Acid (40/60)
Propylene	0	0	0	0	0	0
Glycol-Technical
Grade
Glycolic Acid	3	3	—	—	—	—
(Hydroxy Acetic
Acid)
Product	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear
Homogeneity
pH: Neat	—	—	0.45	0.31	0.32	0.18
Sp. Gravity	—	—	1.187	1.197	1.182	1.238
(23.6° C.), g/mL

[0092] As noted above, as all-in-one detergents, formulations according to the present invention preferably have antimicrobial functionality. In the food processing industry, especially in the dairy industry, it is important to sanitize food handling equipment so as to avoid build up of potentially harmful microbial species such as gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus hirae) which could contaminate the milk product.

[0093] Antimicrobial organic acids are preferred sanitizing agents for use with the present invention. Exemplary antimicrobial organic acids include dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, napthalenesulfonic acid, benzoic acid, and short chain fatty acids (such as octanoic acid, decanoic acid, nonanoic acid), sulfonated oleic acid, salicylic acid, and α-hydroxy acids (such as lactic acid and glycolic acid). The term “short chain fatty acids” as used herein refers to those acids generally having from about 4-15 carbon atoms, preferably from about 6-12 carbon atoms, and more preferably from about 8-10 carbon atoms. In various preferred embodiments, a blend of a C8-C9 fatty acid and a C10-C12 fatty acid is used. Additional exemplary short chain fatty acids include octanoic acid (caprylic acid, C8 alkyl radical), decanoic acid (capric acid, C10 alkyl radical), and blends thereof. A particularly preferred blend of caprylic and capric acids is a 58/40 blend, respectively, that also includes small amounts of hexanoic acid by Cognis Oleochemicals produced under the name EMERY 658.

[0094] Traditional antibacterial agents like chlorophenols, (e.g., p-choro-m-xylenol (PCMX) and 2,4,4-Trichloro-2-hydoxydiphenyl ether (Trichlosan)) and chlorohexidine can be used with the present invention. Preferred germicidal agents for use with the inventive detergents also include nontoxic biodegradable monohydric alcohols, selected polyhydric alcohols, aromatic and aliphatic alcohols. Preferred monohydric alcohols are selected from the group consisting of isopropyl, methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, tert-butyl, benzyl, and allyl alcohols and mixtures thereof. Preferred polyhydric alcohols are selected from the group consisting of propylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,2-butanediol, polyethylene glycol 400, glycerol, and 1,4-butanediol and mixtures thereof.

[0095] Non-chlorine bleaches, such as oxygen bleaching agents, can be used as antimicrobial agents. Preferred oxygen bleaching agents include organic and inorganic peroxygen bleaches and peracids, such as hydrogen peroxide, activated hydrogen peroxides like peracetic acid, activated sodium perborate with teraacetyl ethylenediamine (TAED) activator, alkali metal persulfates, and alkali metal percarbonates. The term “peroxygen compound” as used herein refers to any compound having a chemical formula including a —O—O— structure. Preferred peroxyacids for use with the present invention have the general structure: R—COOOH wherein R is a C1-C18 substituted or unsubstituted, saturated or unsaturated, linear, branched, or cyclic aliphatic, alkyl, or aromatic moiety. R substituent groups can include —OH, —COOH, or heteroatom (—O—, —S—, etc.) moieties, so long as the antimicrobial properties of the compositions are not significantly affected. Particularly preferred peroxyacid compounds are selected from the group consisting of peroxy fatty acids, monoperoxy or diperoxydicarboxylic acids, peroxyaromatic acids, peracetic acid, and perbenzoic acid. Generally, these types of sanitizing agents have the greatest antibacterial functionality at higher wash temperatures.

[0096] Bronopol (2-bromo-2-nitro-1,3-propanediol), the structure of which is shown below, is a water soluble broad spectrum antimicrobial preservative that is especially effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

[0097]
Bronopol is a formaldehyde-releasing agent that decomposes to formaldehyde and bromine compounds in neutral and alkaline pH conditions.

[0098] Other preferred antimicrobial compounds include several biguanide products, especially poly(hexamethylene biguanide)hydrochloride (PHMB), chlorohexidine diacetate (CHA) and chlorohexidine digluconate (CHG). These compounds are highly effective broad spectrum bactericides and are available from Avecia under the name VENTOCIL. The general chemical structures for PHMB and CHG follow.

[0099]
wherein n_avg=12 poly(hexamethylene biguanide)hydrochloride (PHMB)

[0100]

[0101] Particularly preferred biguanide formulations for use as antibacterial agents in accordance with the present invention include cationic formulations comprising about 20% by weight PHMB having a pH of about 4.0-5.0, and formulations comprising about 20% by weight CHG having a pH of about 5.5-7.0.

[0102] Inorganic salts such as sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃), sodium nitrate (NaNO₃), sodium nitrite (NaNO₂), sodium bisulfite (NaHSO₃), sodium sulfite (Na₂SO₃), sodium bisulfate (NaHSO₄) can be used as antimicrobial agents individually or in combination with other antimicrobial agents.

[0103] Chelating agents can be added to the compositions to enhance germicidal activity and cleaning performance. Exemplary chelating agents include ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), sodium ethylenediamineteraacetate salt (Na₄-EDTA), phosphonic acid, octyl phosphonic acid, acrylic acid, polyacrylic acid, aspartic acid, salicylic acid, succinic acid, tartaric acid, ascorbic acid, benzoic acid, sodium benzoate, p-hydroxy benzoic acids and the corresponding esters derivatives (parabans).

[0104] Antibacterial efficacy can be further enhanced using traditional preservatives such as glutaraldehyde (Ucarcide) and quaternary ammonium compounds.

[0105] The inventive detergent compositions described herein preferably comprise up to about 20% by weight antimicrobial agent, more preferably from about 0.5-10% by weight, even more preferably from about 1-8% by weight, and most preferably from about 1.5-6% by weight.

[0106] Table 11 illustrates two compositions in accordance with the present invention, one comprising an antimicrobial agent (mixture of capric/caprylic acid and propylene glycol) and one without, and compares the milk soil cleaning efficacy of each at various wash temperatures and concentrations. Both compositions provided excellent cleaning at the higher temperature washes.

[0107]

TABLE 11
Comparison Between Fatty Alkyl Diaminopropane Detergents With and Without Sanitizing Agent
	Ingredients/Formulation Sequence	147	148
	Deionized Water	21.85	66.6
	Acetic Acid	1	0.25
	Genamin OLP 100	0.15	0.15
	Plurafac LF-303	1.5	1
	Plurafac SLF-18B	1.5	2
	Anhydrous Citric Acid	3	—
	Phosphoric Acid (75%) Food	35	15
	Grade
	Sodium Xylene Sulfonate (40%)	30	—
	Methane Sulfonic Acid (70%)	—	15
	Capric/Caprylic Acid (40/60)	3	—
	Propylene Glycol	3	—
Cleaning Performance/400 ppm Hard Water
Milk Soil Cleaning, %; Film Deposit: Higher Number = Better Cleaning
	% V/V	25° C./8 min	30° C./8 min	40° C./8 min	60° C./8 min
Products Compared	Concentration	Cleaning	Filming	Cleaning	Filming	Cleaning	Filming	Cleaning	Filming
147	0.40%	38	1	44	1	77	1.5	98	3.5
148	0.50%	70	1.5	75	2	90	2.5	97	4
	0.40%	67	1	69	1.5	88	2.5	96	4
	0.30%	59	1	71	2	86	2.5	90	2.5
	0.25%	53	1	64	2	86	2	92	2.5

[0108] In the following examples, the germicidal efficacy of several detergent formulations made in accordance with the present invention were determined by Basic Bactericidal Activity-European Standard EN 1040 and Bactericidal Activity of Chemical Disinfectants and Antiseptics used in Food, Industrial, Domestic, and Industrial Areas-European Standard EN 1276.

[0109] European Standard EN 1040 sets forth a suspension test method for establishing whether a chemical disinfectant or antiseptic meets certain minimum antimicrobial criteria when used at a recommended concentration. This standard is primarily directed toward agricultural products. If a product meets the minimum test requirements, for regulatory purposes, it is considered as possessing bactericidal functionality. The product must demonstrate a 10⁵ reduction (5 log reduction i.e., 99.999% reduction) in vial counts for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC15442) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC6538).

[0110] In this test, a suspension of bacteria was added to a prepared sample of the detergent formulation being tested. The mixture was maintained at 20° C. After a specified contact time (5 minutes), an aliquot was taken and the bactericidal action in this portion was immediately neutralized or suppressed by a validation method. (i.e., by a dilution-neutralization method). The neutralizing composition used comprised: 3 g lecithin, 30 g polysorbate 80, 5 g sodium thiosulphate, 1 g L-histidine chlorhydrate, 30 g saponine, QS of distilled water to 500 mL, 10 mL of 0.25 M phosphate buffer, and QS of distilled water to 1000 mL.

[0111] Tables 12-21 show the EN 1040 test results for many different compositions made in accordance with the invention. It is important to note that the EN 1040 test is performed at 20° C., whereas in practice, the detergent compositions will be used at higher temperatures (preferably about 60° C.). Therefore, even though a detergent formulation does not pass the EN 1040 test, it may still produce a 5 log reduction in microbes when used at the higher temperature.

[0112]

TABLE 12
Detergent Cleaning Performance and Germicidal Data
Ingredients/Formulation Sequence	151	152	153	154
Deionized Water	37.85	36.85	36.85	36.85
Acetic Acid	1	1	1	1
Duomeen SV	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15
Plurafac LF-303	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5
Plurafac S305-LF	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5
Anhydrous Citric Acid	3	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	55	55	55	55
Nitric Acid (70%)	—	—	—	—
NaHSO4	—	—	—	—
Ventocil P (20%)	—	—	—	—
Lactic Acid	—	1	—	—
Glycolic Acid	—	—	1	—
Polyaspartic Acid Sodium Salt (40%)	—	—	—	1
Bronopol	—	—	—	—
Product Homogeneity	Clear Phase	Clear Phase	Clear Phase	Clear Phase
pH: Neat (° C.)	0.91 (27.1)	0.95 (27.6)	0.97 (26.6)	0.93 (27.5)
Sp. Gravity, g/mL	1.307	1.31	1.312	1.312
Cleaning Performance
Usage Concentration, g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	60	61	61	61
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm HW, %	96	98	97	97
Powder Chloroalkaline Detergent Control	95	95	95	95
@ 2 g/L, %
Bacterial Activity EN 1040 Report
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	<0.6 × 104	<0.6 × 104	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Use Concentration-1.0%	<0.8 × 104	<0.6 × 104	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Use Concentration-2.0%	>1.1 × 105	>1.1 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Staphylococcus Aureus	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	<0.9 × 104	<0.9 × 104	<0.8 × 104	<0.8 × 104
Use Concentration-1.0%	<0.9 × 104	<0.9 × 104	<0.8 × 104	<0.8 × 104
Use Concentration-2.0%	<0.9 × 104	<0.9 × 104	<0.8 × 104	<0.8 × 104
Foaming Assmnt.-Dairy Pipe Line	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable
Ingredients/Formulation Sequence	155	156	157	158
Deionized Water	36.85	30.85	36.85	34.85
Acetic Acid	1	1	1	1
Duomeen SV	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15
Plurafac LF-303	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5
Plurafac S305-LF	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5
Anhydrous Citric Acid	3	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	55	55	55	55
Nitric Acid (70%)	—	—	1	—
NaHSO4	—	—	—	3
Ventocil P (20%)	—	7	—	—
Lactic Acid	—	—	—	—
Glycolic Acid	—	—	—	—
Polyaspartic Acid Sodium Salt (40%)	—	—	—	—
Bronopol	1	—	—	—
Product Homogeneity	Clear Phase	Clear Phase	Clear Phase	Clear Phase
pH: Neat (° C.)	0.74 (23.7)	0.76 (24.8)	0.77 (24.5)	0.74 (23.9)
Sp. Gravity, g/mL	1.317	1.313	1.314	1.341
Cleaning Performance
Usage Concentration, g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	61	61	60	61
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm HW, %	97	99	96	98
Powder Chloroalkaline Detergent Control	95	95	95	95
@ 2 g/L, %
Bacterial Activity EN 1040 Report
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	<0.8 × 104	>1.9 × 105	>1.9 × 105	<0.8 × 104
Use Concentration-1.0%	<0.8 × 104	>1.9 × 105	>1.9 × 105	>1.5 × 105
Use Concentration-2.0%	>1.5 × 105	>1.9 × 105	>1.9 × 105	>1.5 × 105
Staphylococcus Aureus	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	<0.8 × 104	<0.6 × 104	<0.6 × 104	<0.8 × 104
Use Concentration-1.0%	<0.8 × 104	<0.6 × 104	<0.6 × 104	<0.8 × 104
Use Concentration-2.0%	<0.8 × 104	<0.6 × 104	<0.6 × 104	<0.8 × 104
Foaming Assmnt.-Dairy Pipe Line	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable

[0113]

TABLE 13
Detergent Cleaning Performance and Germicidal Data
Ingredients/Formulation Sequence	159	160	161
Deionized Water	36.85(34.85)	36.85(43.85)	30.85(27.85)
Acetic Acid	1	1	1
Duomeen O	—	—	—
Duomeen SV	0.15	0.15	0.15
Plurafac SLF-18B	—	—	—
Plurafac LF-4030 (Defoamer)	—	—	—
Plurafac LF-303	1.5	1.5	1.5
Plurafac S305-LF	1.5	1.5	1.5
Anhydrous Citric Acid	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	55	55	55
Sodium Octane Sulfonate (30%)	—	—	—
NaHSO4	—	—	—
Ventocil P (20%)	—	—	7.00(10.00)
Glycolic Acid	1.00(3.00)	—	—
Nitric Acid (70%)	—	1.00(3.00)	—
pH: Neat (° C.)	0.97(0.82)	0.93(0.95)	0.76(0.82)
Sp. Gravity, g/mL	1.310(1.321)	1.312(1.318)	1.313(1.315)
Cleaning Performance
Usage Concentration, g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	60(61)	60(61)	60(61)
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm HW, %	99(96)	97(97)	99(97)
Powder Chloroalkaline Detergent Control	98(95)	98(95)	98(95)
@ 2 G/L, %
Bacterial Activity EN 1040 Report
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	<1.3(1.8) × 105	<1.3(1.3) × 105	<1.9(1.3) × 105
Use Concentration-1.0%	<1.3(1.8) × 105	<1.3(1.3) × 105	<1.9(1.3) × 105
Use Concentration-2.0%	<1.3(1.8) × 105	<1.3(1.3) × 105	<1.9(1.3) × 105
Staphylococcus Aureus	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	<0.8(0.7) × 104	<0.8(0.7) × 104	<0.6(0.7) × 104
Use Concentration-1.0%	<0.8(0.7) × 104	<0.8(0.7) × 104	<0.6(0.7) × 104
Use Concentration-2.0%	<0.8(0.7) × 104	<0.8(0.7) × 104	<0.6(0.7) × 104
Foaming Assmnt.-Dairy Pipe Line	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable
Ingredients/Formulation Sequence	162	163	164	165
Deionized Water	36.85(35.85)	38	27	48.5
Acetic Acid	1	—	—	1.5
Duomeen O	—	—	—	3
Duomeen SV	0.15	—	—	—
Plurafac SLF-18B	—	2	2	—
Plurafac LF-4030 (Defoamer)	—	—	—	3
Plurafac LF-303	1.5	—	—	—
Plurafac S305-LF	1.5	—	—	—
Anhydrous Citric Acid	3	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	55	43	43	43
Sodium Octane Sulfonate (30%)	—	9	21	—
NaHSO4	—	5	2	—
Ventocil P (20%)	—	—	2	—
Glycolic Acid	—	—	—	—
Nitric Acid (70%)	1.00(2.00)	—	—	—
pH: Neat (° C.)	0.77(0.78)	—	—	—
Sp. Gravity, g/mL	1.312(1.318)	—	—	—
Cleaning Performance
Usage Concentration, g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	60(61)	61	61	61
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm HW, %	96(96)	99	98	100
Powder Chloroalkaline Detergent Control	98(95)	98	98	98
@ 2 G/L, %
Bacterial Activity EN 1040 Report
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	<1.9(1.8) × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Use Concentration-1.0%	<1.9(1.8) × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Use Concentration-2.0%	<1.9(1.8) × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Staphylococcus Aureus	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	<0.6(0.7) × 104	<0.5 × 105	<0.6 × 104	<0.6 × 104
Use Concentration-1.0%	<0.6(0.7) × 104	>1.2 × 105	0.3 × 105	1.2 × 104
Use Concentration-2.0%	<0.6(0.7) × 104	>1.2 × 105	>1.2 × 105	>1.2 × 105
Foaming Assmnt.-Dairy Pipe Line	Acceptable	—	—	Acceptable

[0114]

TABLE 14
Detergent Cleaning Performance and Germicidal Data
Ingredients/Formula	166	167	168	169	170	171
Deionized Water	38	20	18.85	38.35	38.35	18.85
Acetic Acid	—	—	1	1	1	1
Duomeen O	—	—	—	—	—	—
Duomeen SV	—	—	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15
Plurafac SLF-18B	2	3	—	—	3	3
Plurafac LF-303	—	—	1.5	1.5	—	—
Plurafac S305-LF	—	—	1.5	1.5	—	—
Anhydrous Citric	3	3	3	3	3	3
Acid
Phosphoric Acid	43	43	43	43	43	43
(75%)
Sodium Octane	9	—	—	—	—	—
Sulfonate (30%)
Sodium Xylene	—	26	26	—	—	26
Sulfonate (40%)
Sulfuric Acid (98%)	—	—	—	1	10	—
NaHSO4	5	5	5	—	—	5
Ventocil P (20%)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Glycolic Acid	—	—	—	1.5	1.5	—
Nitric Acid (70%)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Product	Clear	Clear/Haze	Clear	Clear	Haze	Haze/Top Sep
Homogeneity
pH: Neat (° C.)	—	0.83	0.82	0.63	0.69	0.66
Sp. Gravity, g/mL	1.28	1.3322	1.3479	1.3277	1.3271	1.3464
Cleaning Performance
Usage Concentration, g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature,	61	60	60	60	60	60
° C.
Milk Soil	99	93(99)	93(98)	94(96)	97	99
Cleaning/400 ppm
HW, %
Powder	98	98	98	98	98	98
Chloroalkaline
Detergent Control
@ 2 g/L, %
Bacterial Activity EN 1040 Report
Pseudomonas	Reduction
Aeruginosa
Use Concentration	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105
0.5%
Use Concentration	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105
1.0%
Use Concentration	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105
2.0%
Staphylococcus	Reduction
Aureus
Use Concentration	<0.5 × 105	0.11 × 105	<0.06 × 105	<0.06 × 105	<0.07 × 105	<0.06 × 105
0.5%
Use Concentration	>1.2 × 105	>1.2 × 105	>1.2 × 105	0.21 × 105	0.24 × 105	>1.2 × 105
1.0%
Use Concentration	>1.2 × 105	>1.2 × 105	>1.0 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.2 × 105
2.0%
Foaming Assmnt.	Unacceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable
Ingredients/Formula	172	173	174	175	176	177
Deionized Water	19.85	33.35	38.35	36.85(35.85)	36.85(35.85)	27
Acetic Acid	1	1	1	1	1	—
Duomeen O	—	—	—	—	—	—
Duomeen SV	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15	—
Plurafac SLF-18B	2	3	2	—	—	2
Plurafac LF-303	—	—	—	1.5	1.5	—
Plurafac S305-LF	—	—	—	1.5	1.5	—
Anhydrous Citric	3	3	3	3	3	3
Acid
Phosphoric Acid	43	43	43	55	55	43
(75%)
Sodium Octane	—	—	—	—	—	21
Sulfonate (30%)
Sodium Xylene	26	—	—	—	—	—
Sulfonate (40%)
Sulfuric Acid (98%)	—	15	10	—	—	—
NaHSO4	5	—	—	—	—	2
Ventocil P (20%)	—	—	—	—	—	2
Glycolic Acid	—	1.5	1.5	—	—	—
Nitric Acid (70%)	—	—	—	1.00(2.00)	1.00(2.00)	—
Product	Clear	Haze	Haze/Top	Clear	Clear	Clear
Homogeneity			Sep
pH: Neat (° C.)	0.61	0.61	0.54	0.77(0.78)	0.77(0.78)	—
Sp. Gravity, g/mL	1.3464	1.3708	1.3263	1.312(1.318)	1.312(1.318)	1.26
Cleaning Performance
Usage	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Concentration, g/L
Wash Temperature,	60	60	60	60(61)	60(61)	61
° C.
Milk Soil	96	97	97	96(96)	96(96)	98
Cleaning/400 ppm
HW, %
Powder	98	98	98	98(95)	98(95)	98
Chloroalkaline
Detergent Control
@ 2 g/L, %
Bacterial Activity EN 1040 Report
Pseudomonas	Reduction
Aeruginosa
Use Concentration	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.9(1.8) × 105	>1.9(1.8) × 105	>1.5 × 105
0.5%
Use Concentration	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.9(1.8) × 105	>1.9(1.8) × 105	>1.5 × 105
1.0%
Use Concentration	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.9(1.8) × 105	>1.9(1.8) × 105	>1.5 × 105
2.0%
Staphylococcus	Reduction
Aureus
Use Concentration	<0.06 × 105	<0.07 × 105	<0.07 × 105	<0.06(0.7) × 104	>1.3(>1.3) × 105	<0.06 × 105
0.5%
Use Concentration	0.3 × 105	0.3 × 105	0.30 × 105	<0.06(0.7) × 104	>1.3(>1.3) × 105	0.30 × 105
1.0%
Use Concentration	0.2 × 105	1.1 × 105	>1.3 × 105	<0.06(0.7) × 104	>1.3(>1.3) × 105	>1.2 × 105
2.0%
Foaming Assmnt.	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Unacceptable

[0115]

TABLE 15
Detergent Cleaning Performance and Germicidal Data
Ingredients/
Formula	178	179	180	181	182	183	184	185	186	187	188
Deionized Water	45	44	42.5	46	43	48.5	50	38	45	48	47
Acetic Acid	1	1	1.5	—	1	1.5	—	—	1	—	1
Duomac T	—	—	—	3	3	—	2	—	—	2	—
(Diacetates)
Plurafac SLF-18B	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2	2	2	—
Plurafac LF-4030	2	3	3	3	3	3	—	—	—	—	—
(Defoamer)
Anhydrous	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Citric Acid
Phosphoric Acid	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43	43
(75%)
Sodium Octane	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	9	—	—	—
Sulfonate (30%)
NaHSO4	2	2	2		2	—	—	5	2	2	2
Ventocil P (20%)	2	2	2	2	2	—	2	—	2	2	2
Cleaning Performance
Usage	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L		5 g/L
Concentration,
g/L
Wash	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	60
Temperature, ° C.
Milk Soil	100	99	100	100	100	100	100	99	99	99	100
Cleaning/400
ppm HW, %
Powder	98	98	98	98	98	98	98	98	98	98	98
Chloroalkaline
Detergent Control
@ 2 g/L, %
Bacterial Activity EN 1040 Report
Pseudomonas	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Aeruginosa
Use	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.0 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Concentration
0.5%
Use	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.0 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Concentration
1.0%
Use	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.0 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Concentration
2.0%
Staphylococcus	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Aureus
Use	<0.8 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.6 × 104	<0.6 × 104	<0.9 × 104	<0.5 × 105	<0.6 × 104	>1.3 × 104	>1.3 × 104
Concentration
0.5%
Use	<0.8 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.6 × 104	1.2 × 104	<0.9 × 104	>1.2 × 105	<0.6 × 104	>1.3 × 104	>1.3 × 104
Concentration
1.0%
Use	<0.8 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.6 × 104	>1.2 × 105	<0.9 × 104	>1.2 × 105	<0.6 × 104	>1.3 × 104	>1.3 × 104
Concentration
2.0%
Foaming	Not	Not	—	—	—	—	—	Not	—	Not	Not
Assmnt.-Dairy	Ac-	Ac-						Ac-		Ac-	Ac-
Pipe Line	ceptable	ceptable						ceptable		ceptable	ceptable

[0116]

TABLE 16
Detergent Cleaning Performance and Germicidal Data
Ingredients/Formulation	189	190	191	192	193	194
Deionized Water	41.85	51.85	42.85	23.85	23.85
Acetic Acid	1	1	1	1	1	1
Duomeen SV	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15
Plurafac SLF-18B	1.5	1.5	1.5	2	2	2
Plurafac LF-303	1.5	1.5	1.5	1	1	1
Anhydrous Citric Acid	3	3	3	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	35	35	35	35	35	35
Propylene Glycol	3	3	3	3	3	3
Sodium Xylene Sulfonate (40%)	—	—	—	26	26	26
NaHSO4	10	—	10	5	5	—
Triameen Y12D	3	3	2	—	—	—
Product Homogeneity	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear
Wash Temperature, ° C./Minutes	40/8	40/8	40/8	40/8	40/8	40/8
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm HW, % (film)	85/82(+4/3)	94(+5)	83(+3)	82(+1)/71(+2)/81(+1)	88(+3)/82(+3)	92(+5)
Powder Chloroalkaline Detergent Control @	62/61	62/61 (std/std)	62/61 (std/std)	62/61 (std/std)	62/61 (std/std)	62/61 (std/std)
2 g/L, %(Av 3)	(std/std)
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	>1.6 × 105	>1.6 × 105	>1.6 × 105	>1.2 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105
Use Concentration-1.0%	>1.6 × 105	>1.6 × 105	>1.6 × 105	>1.2 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105
Use Concentration-2.0%	>1.6 × 105	>1.6 × 105	>1.6 × 105	>1.2 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105
Staphylococcus Aureus	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	<0.8 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.8 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.57 × 104	<0.57 × 104
Use Concentration-1.0%	<0.8 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.8 × 104	<0.7 × 104	0.71 × 105	<0.57 × 104
Use Concentration-2.0%	<0.8 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.8 × 104	0.7 × 105	1.1 × 105	>1.1 × 105
Foaming Assmnt.-Dairy Pipe Line	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable

[0117]

TABLE 17
Detergent Cleaning Performance and Germicidal Data Continued
Ingredients/Formulation
Sequence	195	196	197	198	199	200	201
Deionized Water	26.85	20.85	15.85	18.85	24.85	23.85	31.85
Acetic Acid	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Duomeen SV	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15
Plurafac SLF-18B	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Plurafac LF-303	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Anhydrous Citric Acid	—	3	3	3	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid (75%)	35	43	43	43	35	35	20
Propylene Glycol	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Sodium Xylene Sulfonate (40%)	26	26	26	26	28	28	30
NaHSO4	5	—	5	5	—	—	—
Sulfamic Acid	—	—	5	—	—	—	5
Capric/Caprylic Acid	—	—	—	—	2	3	3
(40/60)
Product Homogeneity	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear	Clear
Wash Temperature,	40/8	40/8	40/8	40/8	40/8	40/8	40/8
° C./Minutes
Milk Soil	68(+4)/82(+2)	87(+5)/96(+4)	75(+2)	81(+2)	68(+4)/82(+2)	87(+5)/96(+4)	75(+2)
Cleaning/400 ppm HW, %
(film)
Powder Chloroalkaline	62/61(std/std)	62/61(std/std)	62/61(std/std)	62/61(std/std)	62/61(std/std)	62/61(std/std)	62/61(std/std)
Detergent Control @ 2 gm/L,
%(Av 3)
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	>1.2 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.2 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Use Concentration-1.0%	>1.2 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.2 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Use Concentration-2.0%	>1.2 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.2 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.5 × 105	>1.3 × 105
Staphylococcus Aureus	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	<0.7 × 104	<0.57 × 104	<0.57 × 104	<0.7 × 104	0.64 × 105	>1.9 × 105	>1.9 × 105
Use Concentration-1.0%	<0.7 × 104	0.85 × 104	0.71 × 105	0.28 × 105	>1.9 × 105	>1.9 × 105	>1.9 × 105
Use Concentration-2.0%	>1.4 × 105	>1.1 × 105	>1.1 × 105	0.11 × 105	>1.9 × 105	>1.9 × 105	>1.9 × 105
Foaming Assmnt.-Dairy	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable
Pipe Line

[0118]

TABLE 18
Detergent Cleaning Performance and Germicidal Data
Ingredients/Formulation Sequence	202	203	204	205	206	207
Deionized Water	33.1	20.6	34.85	34.85	27.85	35.85
Acetic Acid	0.25	0.25	1	1	1	1
Duomeen S/SV	—	—	0.15	0.15	0.15	0.15
Duomeen T	0.15	0.15	—	—	—	—
Plurafac LF-303	1	1	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5
Plurafac S305-LF	—	—	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5
Plurafac SLF-18B	1	1	—	—	—	—
Anhydrous Citric Acid	0	3	3	3	3	3
Phosphoric Acid (75%) Food Grade	16	20	55	55	55	55
Nitric Acid (70%)	—	—		—	—	2
Ventocil P (20%)	—	—	—	—	10	—
Glycolic Acid	—	—	3	—	—	—
Polyaspartic Acid Sodium	—	—	—	3	—	—
Salt(40%)
Sodium Xylene Sulfonate (40%)	35.5	36	—	—	—	—
Methane Sulfonic Acid (70%)	10	15	—	—	—	—
Emery Fatty Acid 658	3	3	—	—	—	—
Product Homogeneity	Clear	Clear	Clear Phase	Clear Phase	Clear Phase	Clear Phase
pH: Neat (° C.)/Wash pH @ 400 ppm	0.32	0.18	0.82(25.0)/1.94	0.95(25.6)/1.94	0.82(26.0)/1.96	0.78(24.7)/1.91
HW
Sp. Gravity (23.6° C.), g/mL	1.182	1.238	1.321	1.318	1.315	1.318
Cleaning Performance, 5 g/L Use Concentration
Wash Temperature, 60° C./8 Minutes	—	97.85	—	—	—	—
Wash Temperature, 40° C./8 Minutes	71.3	79.11	—	—	—	—
Usage Concentration, g/L	—	—	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L	5 g/L
Wash Temperature, ° C.	—	—	60	61	61	60
Milk Soil Cleaning/400 ppm HW, %	—	—	96	97	97	96
Powder Chloroalkaline Detergent	—	—	95	95	95	95
Control @ 2 g/L, %
Bacterial Activity-EN 1040 Report
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.8 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.8 × 105
Use Concentration-1.0%	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.8 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.8 × 105
Use Concentration-2.0%	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.8 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.3 × 105	>1.8 × 105
Staphylococcus Aureus	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction	Reduction
Use Concentration-0.5%	>1.9 × 105	>1.3 × 105	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104
Use Concentration-1.0%	>1.9 × 105	>1.9 × 105	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104
Use Concentration-2.0%	>1.9 × 105	>1.9 × 105	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104	<0.7 × 104
Foaming Assmnt.-Dairy Pipe Line	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable	Acceptable