US 7,465,546 B2Grant
Regulation of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) gene expression in living cells via the application of specific and selective electric and electromagnetic fields
Issue Date:2008-12-16
•26 Claims
•9 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
Methods and devices are described for the regulation of Transforming Growth actor (TGF)-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein gene expression in bone cells and other tissues via the capacitive coupling or inductive coupling of specific and selective electric fields to the bone cells or other tissues, where the specific and selective electric fields are generated by application of specific and selective electric and electromagnetic signals to electrodes or one or more coils or other field generating device disposed with respect to the bone cells or other tissues so as to facilitate the treatment of diseased or injured bone and other tissues. By gene expression is meant the up-regulation or down-regulation of the process whereby specific portions (genes) of the human genome (DNA) are transcribed into mRNA and subsequently translated into protein. Methods and devices are provided for the targeted treatment of injured or diseased bone and other tissue that include generating specific and selective electric and electromagnetic signals that generate fields in the target tissue optimized for increase of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein gene expression and exposing bone and other tissue to the fields generated by specific and selective signals so as to regulate TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein gene expression in such tissue. The resulting methods and devices are useful for the targeted treatment of bone fractures, fractures at risk, delayed unions, nonunion of fractures, bone defects, spine fusions, osteonecrosis or avascular necrosis, as an adjunct to other therapies in the treatment of one or all of the above, in the treatment of osteoporosis, and in other conditions in which TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein may be implicated.
Metadata
Assignee
- The Trustees of The University of Pennsylvania
Inventor
- Carl T. Brighton
Application Information
Application Number:US 11/444,179
Filing Date:2006-05-31
Priority Date:2000-02-23
Art Unit:1636
Classifications
IPC:
C12Q1/68C12N13/00
Patent Drawings (9 sheets)
Description
Cross-Reference to Related Applications
[0001] The present patent application is a continuation-in-part patent application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/257,126, filed Oct. 8, 2002, which is the U.S. national phase patent application of PCT/US01/05991, filed Feb. 23, 2001, which, in turn, claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/184,491, filed Feb. 23, 2000.
Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention is directed to a method of up-regulating transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) gene expression in living cells via the application of electric and electromagnetic fields generated by specific and selective electric and electromagnetic signals for the treatment of injured or diseased tissues, as well as devices for generating such signals.
Background of the Invention
[0003] The bioelectrical interactions and activity believed to be present in a variety of biological tissues and cells are one of the least understood of the physiological processes. However, there has recently been much research into these interactions and activity regarding the growth and repair of certain tissues and cells. In particular, there has been much research into stimulation by electric and electromagnetic fields and its effect on the growth and repair of bone, cartilage, and various growth factors. Researchers believe that such research may be useful in the development of new treatments for a variety of medical problems.
[0004] Transforming growth factor—beta (TGF-β) is a pleiotropic growth factor that is present in most tissues and is implicated in cell proliferation, migration, differentiation, and survival. Consequently, TGF-β has clinical applications in diverse conditions such as angiogenesis, autoimmunity, bone repair (fractures, delayed unions, nonunions) and bone maintenance (osteoporosis), cartilage maintenance (degenerative arthritis), tumor suppression, and wound healing (Kim et al., J of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 38: 1-8, (2005); Janssens et al., Endocrine Reviews, 26: 743-774, (2005).
[0005] In acute fractures, delayed union and nonunion of fractures, and in various defects of bone, the formation of new, healing bone is dependent upon the presence of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) to induce bone formation and TGF-βs to induce cartilage formation. In PCT Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/00793, filed Jan. 11, 2005 (claiming priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/535,755, filed Jan. 12, 2004), it was shown that the gene expression of BMPs could be up-regulated by specific and selective electric and electromagnetic fields for the treatment of injured or diseased bone. It is shown herein that the gene expression of TGF-βs can also be up-regulated by specific and selected electric and electromagnetic fields. It is also shown herein that the optimal signal for the gene expression of BMPs is slightly different from that of TGF-βs, and this difference allows one to design a device that delivers one signal that maximally up-regulates the BMPs during the bone phase of fracture healing and another signal that primarily up-regulates the TGF-βs during the cartilage phase of fracture healing. This would be very useful in fracture healing, for instance, where the fracture callus is initially composed of cartilage that gradually is replaced by bone. By maximally up-regulating the TGF-βs to form cartilage early in the healing process, and maximally up-regulating the BMPs to form bone later in the healing process, one is able to optimize the healing of acute fractures, accelerate the healing in delayed fracture healing, and restart the healing process in nonunion fractures.
[0006] Up-regulation of TGF-β may also be useful in the treatment of the disease commonly known as osteoporosis, where bone demineralizes and becomes abnormally rarefied. Bone comprises an organic component of cells and matrix as well as an inorganic or mineral component. The cells and matrix comprise a framework of collagenous fibers that is impregnated with the mineral component of calcium phosphate (85%) and calcium carbonate (10%) that imparts rigidity to the bone. In healthy bone, bone formation and bone resorption are in balance. In osteoporosis, bone resorption exceeds bone formation, leading to bone weakening and possible vertebral body fracture and collapse. While osteoporosis is generally thought as afflicting the elderly, certain types of osteoporosis may affect persons of all ages whose bones are not subject to functional stress. In such cases, patients may experience a significant loss of cortical and cancellous bone during prolonged periods of immobilization. Elderly patients are known to experience bone loss due to disuse when immobilized after fracture of a bone, and such bone loss may ultimately lead to a secondary fracture in an already osteoporotic skeleton. Diminished bone density may lead not only to vertebrae collapse, but also to fractures of hips, lower arms, wrists, ankles as well as incapacitating pains. Alternative non-surgical therapies for such diseases are needed.
[0007] Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) and capacitive coupling (CC) have been used widely to treat nonhealing fractures (nonunion) and related problems in bone healing since approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 1979. The original basis for the trial of this form of therapy was the observation that physical stress on bone causes the appearance of tiny electric currents that, along with mechanical strain, were thought to be the mechanisms underlying transduction of the physical stresses into a signal that promotes bone formation. Along with direct electric field stimulation that was successful in the treatment of nonunion, noninvasive technologies using PEMF and capacitive coupling (where the electrodes are placed on the skin in the treatment zone) were also found to be effective. PEMFs generate small, induced currents (Faraday currents) in the highly-conductive extracellular fluid, while capacitive coupling directly causes currents in the tissues; both PEMFs and CC thereby mimic endogenous electrical currents.
[0008] The endogenous electrical currents, originally thought to be due to phenomena occurring at the surface of crystals in the bone, have been shown to be due primarily to movement of fluid containing electrolytes in channels of the bone containing organic constituents with fixed negative charges, generating what are called “streaming potentials.” Studies of electrical phenomena in bone have demonstrated a mechanical-electrical transduction mechanism that appears when bone is mechanically compressed, causing movement of fluid and electrolytes over the surface of fixed negative charges in the proteoglycans and collagen in the bone matrix. These streaming potentials serve a purpose in bone, and, along with mechanical strain, lead to signal transduction that is capable of stimulating bone cell synthesis of a calcifiable matrix, and, hence, the formation of bone.
[0009] The main application of direct current, capacitive coupling, and PEMFs has been in orthopedics in healing of nonunion bone fractures (Brighton et al., J. Bone Joint Surg. 63: 2-13, 1981; Brighton and Pollack, J. Bone Joint Surg. 67: 577-585, 1985; Bassett et al., Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 17: 451-529, 1989; Bassett et al., JAMA 247: 623-628, 1982). Clinical responses have been reported in avascular necrosis of hips in adults and Legg-Perthes's disease in children (Bassett et al., Clin. Orthop. 246: 172-176, 1989; Aaron et al., Clin. Orthop. 249: 209-218, 1989; Harrison et al., J. Pediatr. Orthop. 4: 579-584, 1984). It has also been shown that PEMFs (Mooney, Spine 15: 708-712, 1990) and capacitive coupling (Goodwin, Brighton et al., Spine 24: 1349-1356, 1999) can significantly increase the success rate of lumbar fusions. There are also reports of augmentation of peripheral nerve regeneration and function and promotion of angiogenesis (Bassett, Bioessays 6: 36-42, 1987). Patients with persistent rotator cuff tendonitis refractory to steroid injection and other conventional measures, showed significant benefit compared with placebo-treated patients (Binder et al., Lancet 695-698, 1984). Finally, Brighton et al. have shown in rats the ability of an appropriate capacitive coupling electric field to both prevent and reverse vertebral osteoporosis in the lumbar spine (Brighton et al., J. Orthop. Res. 6: 676-684, 1988; Brighton et al., J. Bone Joint Surg. 71: 228-236, 1989).
[0010] More recently, research in this area has focused on the effects stimulation has on tissues and cells. For example, it has been conjectured that direct currents do not penetrate cellular membranes, and that control is achieved via extracellular matrix differentiation (Grodzinsky, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9:133-199, 1983). In contrast to direct currents, it has been reported that PEMFs can penetrate cell membranes and either stimulate them or directly affect intracellular organelles. An examination of the effect of PEMFs on extracellular matrices and in vivo endochondral ossification found increased synthesis of cartilage molecules and maturation of bone trabeculae (Aaron et al., J. Bone Miner. Res. 4: 227-233, 1989). More recently, Lorich et al. (Clin. Orthop. Related Res. 350: 246-256, 1998) and Brighton et al. (J. Bone Joint Surg. 83-A, 1514-1523, 2001) reported that signal transduction of a capacitively coupled electric signal is via voltage gated calcium channels, whereas signal transduction of PEMFs or combined electromagnetic fields is via the release of calcium from intracellular stores. In all three types of electrical stimulation there is an increase in cytosolic calcium with a subsequent increase in activated (cytoskeletal) calmodulin.
[0011] It was reported in 1996 by the present inventors that a cyclic biaxial 0.17% mechanical strain produces a significant increase in TGF-β1 mRNA in cultured MC3T3-E1 bone cells in a cooper dish (Brighton et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 229: 449-453, 1996). Several significant studies followed in 1997. In one study it was reported that the same cyclic biaxial 0.17% mechanical strain produced a significant increase in PDGF-A mRNA in similar bone cells (Brighton et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 43: 339-346, 1997). It was also reported that a 60 kHz capacitively coupled electric field of 20 mV/cm produced a significant increase in TGF-β1 in similar bone cells in a cooper dish (Brighton et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 237: 225-229, 1997). However, the effect such a field would have on other genes within the body has not been reported in the literature.
[0012] In the above-referenced parent patent application, entitled Regulation of Genes Via Application of Specific and Selective Electrical and Electromagnetic Signals, methods were disclosed for determining the specific and selective electrical and electromagnetic signals for use in creating fields for regulating target genes of diseased or injured tissues. The present invention builds upon the technique described therein by describing the method of regulating expression of one targeted gene family, namely, TGF-β's gene expression, through application of a field generated by a specific and selective electrical and electromagnetic signal, for the treatment of fresh fractures, fractures at risk, delayed unions, nonunion of fractures, bone defects, spine fusions, osteonecrosis or avascular necrosis, as an adjunct to other therapies in the treatment of one or all of the above, and in the treatment of osteoporosis.
Summary of the Invention
[0013] The present invention relates to regulating transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) gene expression in bone cells (as an example) via the application of specific and selective electric and/or electromagnetic fields generated by specific and selective electric and/or electromagnetic signals applied to electrodes. By performing sequential dose-response curves on the electric signal duration, amplitude, frequency, and duty cycle in which the effects of the resultant electric field are measured, the optimal signal for up-regulating TGF-β mRNA in bone cells was discovered. The optimal signal generated a capacitively coupled electric field with an amplitude of 20-40 mV/cm, a duration of 24 hours, a frequency of 60 kHz, and a duty cycle of 50%. In particular, the present invention relates to up-regulating TGF-β 1, 2, and 3 gene expression in bone cells via the application of fields generated by such signals.
[0014] In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, methods are provided to specifically and selectively up-regulate the gene expression (as measured by mRNA) of TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3 with capacitively coupled electric fields, electromagnetic fields, or combined fields. Fresh fractures, fractures at risk, delayed unions, nonunion fractures, bone defects, osteonecrosis, osteoporosis, and the like are treated with a capacitively coupled electric field of about 20-40 mV/cm with an electric field duration of about 24 hours, a frequency of 60 kHz, a duty cycle of about 50%, and a sine wave configuration that causes the expression of TGF-βs 1, 2, and 3 to be up-regulated. In accordance with the method of the invention, a “specific and selective” signal is a signal that has predetermined characteristics of amplitude, duration, duty-cycle, frequency, and waveform that up-regulates the expression of the TGF-β genes (specificity). This allows one to choose different signals to up-regulate TGF-β gene expressions in order to achieve a given biological or therapeutic response (selectivity). The invention further relates to devices employing the methods described herein to generate specific and selective signals that create electric fields to up-regulate the expression of TGF-β genes.
[0015] In related aspects, the invention relates to methods and devices for the treatment of fresh fractures, fractures at risk, delayed unions, nonunions, bone defects, spine fusion, osteonecrosis, as an adjunct to other therapies treating one or more of the above, and in the treatment of osteoporosis. The method of the invention also includes the methodology for determining the “specific and selective” signal for TGF-β gene expression by methodically varying the duration of a starting signal known to increase, or suspected to increase, cellular production of TGF-βs. After finding the optimal duration, the amplitude of the signal is varied for the optimal duration of time as determined by the gene expression of TGF-β 1, 2, and 3. The duty cycle, frequency, and waveform are varied methodically in the same dose response manner as above while keeping the other signal characteristics constant. This process is repeated until the optimal signal is determined that produces the greatest increase in the expression of TGF-βs.
[0016] These and other aspects of the present invention will be elucidated in the following detailed description of the invention.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0017] FIG. 1 is a graphic representation of the mRNA expression of TGF-βs 1, 2, and 3 when bone cells are exposed to a 20 mV/cm capacitively coupled electric field for various time durations. As indicated, the maximum expression for the various TGF-β mRNAs occurred with a signal of 24 hours duration.
[0018] FIG. 2 is a graphic representation of the mRNA expression of TGF-β 1, 2, and 3 when bone cells are exposed to various capacitively coupled electric field amplitudes with a duration of 24 hours. As indicated, the maximum expression for the various TGF-β mRNAs occurred with a field amplitude of 20-40 mV/cm.
[0019] FIG. 3 is a graphic representation of the mRNA expression of TGF-β 1, 2, and 3 when bone cells are exposed to various capacitively coupled electric field frequencies with a field amplitude of 20-40 mV/cm and a signal duration of 24 hours. As indicated, the maximum expression for the various TGF-β mRNAs occurred with a frequency of 60 kHz.
[0020] FIG. 4 is a graphic representation of the mRNA expression of TGF-β 1, 2, and 3 when bone cells are exposed to various capacitively coupled electric field duty cycles with a frequency of 60 kHz, a field amplitude of 20 mV/cm, and a signal duration of 24 hours. As indicated, the maximum expression for the various TGF-β mRNAs occurred with a 50% to 100% duty cycle with a sine wave configuration.
[0021] FIG. 5 is a graphic representation of the TGF-β1 protein when bone cells are exposed 24 hours to a capacitively coupled electric field of a 50% duty cycle with a field amplitude of 20 mV/cm or 40 mV/cm, a frequency of 60 kHz, and a sine wave configuration. As indicated, the amount of TGF-β1 protein increase was the same with either 20 or 40 mV/cm.
[0022] FIG. 6 is a graphic representation of BMP-2 protein when bone cells are exposed 24 hours to a capacitively coupled electric field of a 50% duty cycle with a field amplitude of 20 mV/cm or 40 mV/cm, a frequency of 60 kHz, and a sine wave configuration. As indicated, unlike the TGF-β1 response shown in FIG. 5 , there was no significant increase in BMP-2 protein production at a field of 40 mV/cm as compared to that occurring at 20 mV/cm.
[0023] FIG. 7 is a graphic representation of BMP mRNA expression when bone cells are exposed to a 50% duty cycle, capacitively coupled electric field (20 mV/cm, 60 kHz, sine wave) for 24 hours. Comparing this figure to FIG. 2 shows the clear distinction between the lack of response of the bone cell production of BMP protein in a 40 mV/cm field versus the very significant increase of the bone cell production of TGF-β protein in a 40 mV/cm field.
[0024] FIG. 8 illustrates the BMP gene expression of FIG. 7 on the same graph as the TGF-β gene expression of FIG. 2 .
[0025] FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a device for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments of the Invention
[0026] The invention will be described in detail below with reference to FIGS. 1-9 Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the description given herein with respect to those figures is for exemplary purposes only and is not intended in any way to limit the scope of the invention. All questions regarding the scope of the invention may be resolved by referring to the appended claims.
[0027] The present invention is based on the discovery that the expression of certain genes can be regulated by the application of fields generated by specific and selective electric and/or electromagnetic signals. In other words, it has been discovered by the present inventor that there is a specific electric and/or electromagnetic signal that generates a field for regulating each gene in bone, cartilage and other tissue cells and that these specific signals are capable of specifically and selectively regulating the genes in such cells. In particular, gene expression governing the growth, maintenance, repair, and degeneration or deterioration of tissues or cells can be regulated in accordance with the invention via the application of fields generated by specific and selective electric and/or electromagnetic signals so as to produce a salutary clinical effect. Such discoveries are useful in the development of treatment methods that target certain medical conditions including fresh bone fractures, fractures at risk, delayed union, nonunion, bone defects, spine fusion, osteonecrosis, as an adjunct in the treatment of any one or more of the above, and in the treatment of osteoporosis.
[0028] As used herein, the phrase “signal” is used to refer to a variety of signals including mechanical signals, ultrasound signals, electromagnetic signals and electric signals output by a device. It is to be understood that the term “field” as used herein refers to an electrical field within targeted tissue, whether it is a combined field or a pulsed electromagnetic field or generated by direct current, capacitive coupling or inductive coupling.
[0029] The phrase “remote” is used to mean acting, acted on or controlled from a distance. “Remote” regulation refers to controlling the expression of a gene from a distance. To provide “remotely” refers to providing from a distance. For example, providing a specific and selective signal from a remote source can refer to providing the signal from a source at a distance from a tissue or a cell, or from a source outside of or external to the body.
[0030] The phrase “specific and selective” signal means a signal that produces an electric field that has predetermined characteristics of amplitude, duration, duty cycle, frequency, and waveform that up-regulate or down-regulate a targeted gene or targeted functionally complementary genes (specificity). This allows one to choose different “specific and selective” signals to up-regulate or down-regulate expression of various genes in order to achieve a given biological or therapeutic response (selectivity).
[0031] The term “regulate” means to control gene expression. Regulate is understood to include both up-regulate and down-regulate. Up-regulate means to increase expression of a gene, while down-regulate means to inhibit or prevent expression of a gene.
[0032] “Functionally complementary” refers to two or more genes whose expressions are complementary or synergistic in a given cell or tissue.
[0033] “Tissue” refers to an aggregate of cells together with their extracellular substances that form one of the structural materials of a patient. As used herein, the term “tissue” is intended to include any tissue of the body including muscle and organ tissue, tumor tissue as well as bone or cartilage tissue. Also, the term “tissue” as used herein may also refer to an individual cell.
[0034] “Patient” refers to an animal, preferably a mammal, more preferably a human.
[0035] The present invention provides treatment methods and devices that target certain tissues, cells or diseases. In particular, the gene expression associated with the repair process in injured or diseased tissues or cells can be regulated by the application of fields generated by electric signals that are specific and selective for the genes to be regulated in the target tissues or cells. Gene expression can be up-regulated or down-regulated by the application of signals that are specific and selective for each gene or each set of complementary genes so as to produce a beneficial clinical effect. For example, a particular specific and selective signal may create an electric field that up-regulates a certain desirable gene expression, while the same or another particular specific and selective signal may create an electric field that down-regulates a certain undesirable gene expression. A certain gene may be up-regulated by a field generated by one particular specific and selective signal and down-regulated by a field generated by another specific and selective signal. Those skilled in the art will understand that certain diseased or injured tissues can be targeted for treatment by regulating those genes governing the growth, maintenance, repair, and degeneration or deterioration of the tissues.
[0036] The methods and devices of the present invention are based on identifying those signals that generate fields that are specific and selective for the gene expression associated with certain targeted diseased or injured tissue. For example, electricity in its various forms (e.g., capacitive coupling, inductive coupling, combined fields) can specifically and selectively regulate gene expression in targeted tissues or cells in a patient's body by varying the frequency, amplitude, waveform or duty cycle of the applied field for each selected gene. The duration of time exposed to electricity can also influence the capability of electricity to specifically and selectively regulate gene expression in targeted tissues or cells in a patient's body. Specific and selective signals may generate electric fields for application to each gene systematically until the proper combination of frequency, amplitude, waveform, duty cycle, and duration is found that provides the desired effect on gene expression.
[0037] It is to be understood that a variety of diseased or injured tissues or disease states can be targeted for treatment because the specificity and selectivity of an electric field for a certain gene expression can be influenced by several factors. In particular, an electrical field of appropriate frequency, amplitude, waveform and/or duty cycle can be specific and selective for the expression of certain genes and thus provide for targeted treatments. Temporal factors (e.g., duration of time exposed to the electrical field) can also influence the specificity and selectivity of an electric field for a particular gene expression. The regulation of gene expression may be more effective (or made possible) via the application of an electrical field for a particular duration of time. Therefore, those skilled in the art will understand that the present invention provides for varying the frequency, amplitude, waveform, duty cycle and/or duration of application of an electric field until the electric field is found to be specific and selective for certain gene expressions in order to provide for treatments targeting a variety of diseased or injured tissue or diseases.
[0038] Thus, the present invention can provide for targeted treatments because it is possible to regulate expression of certain genes associated with a particular diseased or injured tissue via the application of electric fields generated by specific and selective signals of appropriate frequency, amplitude, waveform and/or duty cycle for an appropriate duration of time. The specificity and selectivity of a signal generating an electrical field may thus be influenced so as to regulate the expression of certain genes in order to target certain diseased or injured tissue or disease states for treatment. In particular, the present invention provides for the targeted treatment of fresh bone fractures, fractures at risk, nonunion, bone defects, spine fusion, osteonecrosis, as an adjunct in the treatment of one or any of the above, and in the treatment of osteoporosis.
[0039] The devices of the present invention are capable of applying a field generated by specific and selective signals directly to diseased or injured tissue and/or to the skin of a patient. The devices of the present invention may also provide for the remote application of specific and selective fields (e.g., application of a field at a distance from diseased or injured tissue yet which yields the desired effect within the targeted cells), although it will be appreciated that capacitively coupled devices must touch the subject's skin. The devices of the present invention may include means for attaching the electrodes to the body of a patient in the vicinity of injured or diseased tissue in the case of capacitive coupling. For example, self-adherent conductive electrodes may be attached to the skin of the patient on both sides of a fractured bone. As shown in FIG. 9 , the device 10 of the present invention may include self-adherent electrodes 12 for attaching the device to the body of a patient. For example, the device 10 of the present invention may include electrodes attached to a power unit 14 that has a VELCRO® patch 16 on the reverse side such that the power unit 14 can be attached to a VELCRO® strap (not shown) fitted around a cast on the patient. In the case of inductive coupling, the device of the present invention may include coils attached to a power unit in place of electrodes.
[0040] The device 10 of the present invention can be employed in a variety of ways. The device 10 may be portable or may be temporarily or permanently attached to a patient's body. The device 10 of the present invention is preferably non-invasive. For example, the device 10 of the present invention may be applied to the skin of a patient by application of electrodes adapted for contact with the skin of a patient for the application of electric fields generated by the predetermined specific and selective electric signals. Such signals may also be applied via coils in which time varying currents flow, thus producing specific and selective electromagnetic fields that penetrate the tissue and create the specific and selective electric fields in the target tissue. The device 10 of the present invention may also be capable of implantation in a patient, including implantation under the skin of a patient.
[0041] Those skilled in the art will further understand that the devices of the present invention can be provided in a variety of forms including a capacitively coupled power unit with programmed, multiple, switchable, specific and selective signals for application to one pair or to multiple pairs of electrodes, electromagnetic coils or a solenoid attached to a power unit with switchable, multiple, specific and selective signals, and an ultrasound stimulator with a power supply for generating specific and selective signals. Generally speaking, device preference is based on patient acceptance and patient compliance. The smallest and most portable unit available in the art at the present time is a capacitive coupling unit; however, patients with extremely sensitive skin may prefer to use inductive coupling units. On the other hand, ultrasound units require the most patient cooperation, but may be desirable for use by certain patients.
Example
[0042] The invention is demonstrated in the following example, which is for purposes of illustration and is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
Materials and Methods
[0043] MC3T3-E1 bone cells (5×105 cells/cm2) were plated onto specially-modified Cooper dishes. The cells were grown for seven days with the medium changed just prior to beginning of the experimental condition. The experimental cell cultures throughout these studies were subjected to a capacitively coupled 60 kHz sine wave signal electric field with an output of 44.81 V peak-to-peak. This produced a calculated-field strength in the culture medium in the dishes of 20 mV/cm with a current density of 300 μA/cm2. Control cell culture dishes were identical to those of the stimulated dishes except that the electrodes were not connected to a function generator.
[0044] At the end of the experiment, total RNA was isolated using TRIzol, according to the manufacturer's instructions, and reversed transcription (RT) using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase was performed. Oligonucleotide primers to be used in the real time RT-PCR technique were selected from published cDNA sequences or designed using the Primer Express software program. Quantitative real-time analysis of RT-PCR products was performed using an ABI Prism® 7000 Sequence Detection System.
[0045] The optimal signal for the desired up-regulation of (TGF) genes—including genes for TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3, among others—was found systematically as follows. An electrical signal known to cause creation of an electric field that increases (or even just suspected to increase) cellular production of a given protein is taken as the starting signal for determining the specific signal for generating the electric field for the gene expression (mRNA) of that protein. A dose-response curve is first performed by varying the duration of the signal while holding all the other signal characteristics constant (amplitude, duty cycle, frequency, and waveform) (FIG. 1 ). This determines the optimal duration of the starting signal for the gene expression of that protein. A second dose-response curve is then performed, this time varying the amplitude of the electric field (in mV/cm) while holding the optimal duration and other signal characteristics constant (FIG. 2 ). A third dose response is performed, this time varying the signal frequency while holding constant the optimal duration and optimal amplitude as found previously (FIG. 3 ). A fourth dose-response is performed varying the duty cycle from 100% (constant) to 10% or less while holding constant the optimal duration, amplitude, and frequency as found previously (FIG. 4 ). By this method, an optimal signal is determined for producing the greatest increase in the gene expression of each of the various TGF-betas.
[0046] A fifth experiment is performed using a continuous 50% duty cycle (capacitive coupling, 60 kHz, sine wave) to compare a 20 mV/cm field to a 40 mV/cm field in the production of the TGF-β1 protein. As indicated, the TGF-β1 protein increased significantly and equally in the two fields. (FIG. 5 ). A sixth experiment is performed to demonstrate an increase in production of the BMP-2 protein in the same two fields as described in FIG. 5 (20 mV/cm and 40 mV/cm). After 24 hours of stimulation with a 50% duty cycle (capacitively coupled, 60 kHz, sine wave) field, there was a significant increase in BMP-2 protein in the 20 mV/cm field but no significant increase in the BMP-2 protein in the 40 mV/cm field (FIG. 6 .) Thus, and this is very important, one can separate the expressions of the TGF-β genes from the BMP genes by stimulating cells with a 40 m v/cm field, even though the genes all belong to the same TGF super family. This is clearly shown when one compares FIG. 2 with FIG. 7 . In FIG. 7 , a field of 20 mV/cm clearly has a much greater response in up-regulating BMP gene expression than any other field. By contrast, in FIG. 2 it is shown that 20 mV/cm and 40 mV/cm fields are equally effective in up-regulating TGF-β gene expression. FIG. 8 illustrates the BMP gene expression of FIG. 7 on the same graph as the TGF-β gene expression of FIG. 2 . Thus, in fracture healing, one has the option of stimulating bone and cartilage formation together during the osteogenetic phase of fracture healing or of cartilage only during the cartilage phase of fracture healing.
[0047] The present invention clearly shows that the optimal electric field described in the example can very significantly up-regulate TGF-β 1,2, and 3 mRNA and, hence, increase bone formation in fracture healing, delayed healing, nonunion, bone defects, spine fusions, and in osteoporosis. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that an appropriate electric field, as described herein with capacitive coupling, is also equally effective with inductive coupling and all electromagnetic systems that produce equivalent, or nearly equivalent, electric field characteristics. Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that more unique signal characteristics may be discovered through more experimentation with more data points (e.g., a 100±3% duty cycle for 30±3 min), but such relatively minor variations in each of the signal characteristics are believed to be within the level of those skilled in the art given the teachings herein.
[0048] Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that numerous other modifications to the invention are possible within the scope of the invention. For example, the optimal field described herein can be applied to any bone via two or more appropriate surface electrodes, in pairs or strips, incorporated in braces, wraps, or casts, and delivered by means of capacitive coupling. Also, the optimal field described here can be applied to any bone via coil(s) or solenoid incorporated into braces, wraps, or casts, and delivered by means of inductive coupling. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not intended to be limited to the preferred embodiment described above, but only by the appended claims.
Claims
Certificate of Correction present
The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.
What is claimed is:
1. A method of up-regulating the gene expression of Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein in targeted tissue, comprising the steps of:
a. generating at least one specific and selective signal having a frequency from 30 kHz to 120 kHz that when applied to a field generating device operatively disposed with respect to said targeted tissue causes the generation of an electric field having an amplitude of about 0.2 to 80 mV/cm in the targeted tissue that is specific and selective for the up-regulation of the gene expression of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein in said targeted tissue as measured by mRNA when said electric field is applied to the targeted tissue containing said TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein; and
b. exposing said targeted tissue to the specific and selective electric field generated by said field generating device upon application of said at least one specific and selective signal thereto for a predetermined duration of time from approximately ½ hour to 24 hours per 24 hour period at a predetermined duty cycle from approximately 10%-100% so as to selectively up-regulate the gene expression of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein in said targeted tissue as measured by mRNA.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the generating step comprises the step of selectively varying the amplitude, duration, duty cycle, frequency, and waveform of the applied specific and selective signal until the gene expression of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein in said targeted tissue as a result of exposure to the resultant specific and selective electric field as measured by mRNA in the targeted tissue is substantially increased.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the exposing step comprises the step of exposing bone cells to the specific and selective electric field for a duration of approximately 24 hours every 24 hours.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the generating step comprises the step of generating an electric signal having a sine wave configuration, a duty cycle of approximately 50%, and a frequency of approximately 60 kHz and the resultant specific and selective electric field in the targeted tissue has an amplitude of approximately 20 to 40 mV/cm.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein said generating step comprises the step of generating the specific and selective signal at a remote source and said exposing step comprises the step of applying the specific and selective electric field to bone tissue.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the exposing step comprises the step of applying the specific and selective signal to said field generating device located near the bone tissue.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the exposing step comprises the step of applying the specific and selective electric field in the targeted tissue generated by the field generating device upon application of said at least one specific and selective signal thereto to the targeted tissue through capacitive coupling or inductive coupling.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein when the specific and selective signal is applied to an electrode the electrode generates a capacitive coupling electric field, and when the specific and selective signal is applied to one or more coils said one or more coils generate an electromagnetic field or a combined field.
9. A method for treating a bone fracture, fracture at risk, delayed union, nonunion, bone defect, spine fusion, osteonecrosis, osteoporosis, and/or other conditions in which Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein has been implicated in a patient, comprising the steps of:
a. generating at least one specific and selective signal having a frequency from 30 kHz to 120 kHz that when applied to a field generating device operatively disposed with respect to targeted tissue causes the generation of an electric field having an amplitude of about 0.2 to 80 mV/cm in the targeted tissue that is specific and selective for up-regulating the gene expression of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein in said targeted tissue as measured by mRNA when said electric field is applied to the targeted tissue containing said TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein; and
b. exposing said targeted tissue to the specific and selective electric field generated by said field generating device upon application of said at least one specific and selective signal thereto for a predetermined duration of time from approximately ½ hour to 24 hours per 24 hour period at a predetermined duty cycle from approximately 10% to 100% so as to selectively up-regulate the gene expression of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein in said targeted tissue as measured by mRNA.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the exposing step comprises the step of capacitively coupling or inductively coupling the specific and selective electric field to the targeted tissue.
11. The method of claim 9 wherein the exposing step comprises the step of applying one of an electromagnetic field and a combined field to the targeted tissue.
12. The method of claim 9 wherein the generating step comprises the step of generating an electric signal having a sine wave configuration, a duty cycle of approximately 50%, and a frequency of approximately 60 kHz and the resultant specific and selective electric field has an amplitude of approximately 20 to 40 mV/cm in the targeted tissue.
13. The method of claim 9 wherein the exposing step comprises the step of applying the specific and selective electric field to the targeted tissue for a duration of approximately 24 hours every 24 hours.
14. The method of claim 9 wherein the exposing step comprises the steps of causing the generation of a 20 mV/cm field in the targeted tissue for a selected period of time and causing the generation of a 40 mV/cm field in the targeted tissue for another selected period of time, whereby stimulation of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is differentiated from stimulation of (TGF)-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein by the increase in field amplitude from 20 mV/cm to 40 mV/cm.
15. The method of claim 9 wherein the generating step comprises the steps of starting with any electric signal that when applied to said field generating device generates an electric field that is known or thought to be effective on living cells, performing a first dose-response curve on the duration of stimulation of the electric field to determine an optimal duration; performing a second dose-response curve on the amplitude of the applied electric signal using the optimal duration as previously found to determine an optimal amplitude; performing a third dose-response curve on the frequency of the applied electric signal keeping the optimal duration and optimal amplitude as previously found to determine an optimal frequency; performing a fourth dose-response curve varying the duty cycle of the applied electric signal and keeping the optimal duration, amplitude, and frequency as previously found to determine an optimal duty cycle, and keeping the optimal duration, amplitude, frequency and duty cycle constant while varying the waveform until an optimal waveform for the up-regulation of the gene expression of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein as measured by mRNA and the indicated protein in the bone tissue is found.
16. A device for the treatment of a bone fracture, fracture at risk, delayed union, nonunion, bone defect, spine fusion, osteonecrosis, osteoporosis, and/or other conditions in which Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein has been implicated in a patient, comprising a signal source that generates at least one specific and selective signal having a frequency from 30 kHz to 120 kHz and a field generating device connected to the signal source so as to receive said at least one specific and selective signal and that is operatively disposed with respect to targeted tissue, said field generating device upon receipt of said at least one specific and selective signal causing the generation of an electric field having an amplitude of about 0.2 to 80 mV/cm in the targeted tissue that is specific and selective for up-regulating the gene expression of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein in said targeted tissue as measured by mRNA, said signal source controlling and varying the duration of time of application of said at least one specific and selective signal for a duration of time from approximately ½ hour to 24 hours per 24 hour period and controlling and varying the duty cycle of said at least one specific and selective signal applied to said field generating device from approximately 10% to 100% so as to selectively up-regulate gene expression of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein in said targeted tissue as a result of application of said specific and selective electric field thereto.
17. The device of claim 16 further comprising a portable power unit that drives said signal source in first and second modes, an output signal in the first mode causing the generation of a 20 mV/cm field in the targeted tissue for a selected period of time and an output signal in the second mode causing the generation of a 40 mV/cm field in the targeted tissue for another selected period of time.
18. The device of claim 17 wherein the portable power unit is programmable such that fields generated during said first and second modes can be sequentially applied to the targeted tissue for various periods of time and in various orders.
19. The device of claim 16 further comprising means for attaching the field generating device to the body of a patient in the vicinity of bone tissue.
20. The device of claim 16 further comprising means for attaching the signal source to the body of a patient.
21. The device of claim 16 wherein the electric field generated by application of said at least one specific and selective signal to the field generating device is applied to said targeted tissue via capacitive coupling or inductive coupling.
22. The device of claim 21 wherein the specific and selective signal has a sine wave configuration, a duty cycle of approximately 50%, and a frequency of approximately 60 kHz, and the resultant specific and selective electric field has an amplitude of about 20 mV/cm-40 mV/cm in the targeted tissue.
23. A method of treating a bone fracture, fracture at risk, delayed union, nonunion, bone defect, spine fusion, osteonecrosis, osteoporosis, and/or other conditions in which Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein has been implicated in a patient, comprising the steps of exposing targeted tissue to the specific and selective electric field generated by the device of claim 22 so as to up-regulate gene expression of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein in the targeted tissue as measured by mRNA in the targeted tissue.
24. A method of determining a specific and selective electric signal that when applied to a field generating device causes the generation of an electric field in targeted tissue that up-regulates Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein in the targeted tissue, comprising the steps of staffing with a staffing electric signal with a signal shape and frequency that when applied to said field generating device generates an electric field that is known or thought to affect cellular production of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein, selectively varying a duration of application of said staffing signal until a duration that provides a most significant increase in production of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein is found, selectively varying an amplitude of the staffing signal until an amplitude that provides a most significant increase in production of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein is found, selectively varying a duty cycle of the staffing signal until a duty cycle that provides a most significant increase in production of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein is found, and selectively varying an on-off interval of the duty cycle of the signal until an on-off interval that provides a most significant increase in production of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein is found.
25. A method as in claim 24, comprising the further steps of selectively varying a frequency and waveform of said staffing signal, keeping other signal characteristics constant, until a most significant increase in production of TGF-β1, β2, and/or β3 protein as measured by mRNA is found.
26. The device of claim 16 wherein the field generating device comprises an electrode or one or more coils.
Patent Citations (46)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4430999(A) | 1984-02-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US4442846(A) | 1984-04-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US4467808(A) | 1984-08-01 | Brighton et al. | Examiner |
| US4467809(A) | 1984-08-01 | Brighton | Applicant |
| US4487834(A) | 1984-12-01 | Brighton | Applicant |
| US4506674(A) | 1985-03-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US4509520(A) | 1985-04-01 | Dugot | Applicant |
| US4535775(A) | 1985-08-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US4549547(A) | 1985-10-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US4600010(A) | 1986-07-01 | Dugot | Examiner |
| US4683873(A) | 1987-08-01 | Cadossi et al. | Applicant |
| US4998532(A) | 1991-03-01 | Griffith | Applicant |
| US5014699(A) | 1991-05-01 | Pollack et al. | Applicant |
| US5038797(A) | 1991-08-01 | Batters | Applicant |
| US5269746(A) | 1993-12-01 | Jacobson | Applicant |
| US5273033(A) | 1993-12-01 | Hoffman | Applicant |
| US5338286(A) | 1994-08-01 | Abbott et al. | Applicant |
| US5374283(A) | 1994-12-01 | Flick | Applicant |
| US5743844(A) | 1998-04-01 | Tepper et al. | Applicant |
| US5968527(A) | 1999-10-01 | Litovitz | Applicant |
| US6083149(A) | 2000-07-01 | Wascher et al. | Applicant |
| US6132362(A) | 2000-10-01 | Tepper et al. | Applicant |
| US6186940(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Kirschbaum | Applicant |
| US6261221(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Tepper et al. | Applicant |
| US6485963(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Wolf et al. | Applicant |
| US6605089(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Michelson | Applicant |
| US6747004(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Tabibzadeh | Applicant |
| US6919205(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Brighton | Applicant |
| US6955642(B1) | 2005-10-01 | Simon | Applicant |
| US7022506(B2) | 2006-04-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US7130692(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US7158835(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US7167753(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US7215995(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0052634(A1) | 2002-05-01 | March | Applicant |
| US2002/0125769(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Riley et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0211084(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0138709(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Brighton | Applicant |
| US2005/0203591(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Brighton | Applicant |
| US2006/0190043(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Brighton et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0235473(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Brighton | Applicant |
| US2007/0299472(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Brighton | Applicant |
| EP1198580(B1) | 2006-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/02585(A1) | 2000-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/62336(A1) | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2005/070136(A2) | 2005-08-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (38)
- Aaron, R.K., et al., “Stimulation of experimental endochondral ossification by low-energy pulsing electromagnetic fields,” J. Bone Miner. Res., Nov. 2, 1989, 4, 227-233.Applicant
- Aaron, R.K., et al., “The conservative treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” Clin. Orthop., 1989, 249, 209-218.Applicant
- Bassett, C.A.L., et al., “Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on Steinberg ratings of femoral head osteonecrosis,” Clin. Orthop., Sep. 1989, 246, 172-185.Applicant
- Bassett, C.A.L., et al., “Fundamental and practical aspects of therapeutic uses of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMSs),” Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 1989, 17(5), 451-529.Applicant
- Bassett, C.A.L., et al., “Pulsing electromagnetic field treatment in ununited fractures and failed arthrodeses,” JAMA, Feb. 5, 1982, 247(5), 623-628.Applicant
- Bassett,C.A.L., “Low energy pulsing electromagnetic fields modify biomedical processes,” BioEssays, 1987, 6(1) , 36-42.Applicant
- Binder, A., et al., “Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy of persistent rotator cuff tendonitis,” Lancet, Mar. 31, 1984, 695-698.Applicant
- Brighton, C.T., et al., “A multicenter study of the treamtent of non-union with constant direct current,” J. Bone and Joint Surgery, Jan. 1981, 62-A(1), 2-13.Applicant
- Brighton, C.T., et al., “Fracture healing in the rabbit fibula when subjected to various capacitively coupled electrical fields,” J. Orthop. Res., 1985, 3, 331-340.Applicant
- Brighton, C.T., et al., “In vitro bone-cell response to a capacitively coupled electrical field,” Clin. Orthop. Related Res., Dec. 1992, 285, 255-262.Applicant
- Brighton, C.T., et al., “Increased cAMP production after short-term capacitively coupled stimulation in bovine growth plate chondrocytes,” J. Orthop. Res., 1988, 6, 552-558.Applicant
- Brighton, C.T., et al., “Signal transduction in electrically stimulated bone cells,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 2001, 83-A(10), 1514-1523.Applicant
- Brighton, C.T., et al., “Treatment of castration-induced osteoporosis by a capacitively coupled electrical signal in rat vertebrae,” J. Bone and Joint Surgery, Feb. 1989, 71-A(2), 228-236.Applicant
- Brighton, C.T., et al., “Treatment of denervation/disuse osteoporosis in the rat with a capacitively coupled electrical signal: effects on bone formation and bone resorption,” J. Orthop. Res., 1988, 6, 676-684.Applicant
- Brighton, C.T., et al., “Treatment of recalcitrant non-union with a capacitively coupled electrical field,” J. Bone and Joint Surgery, Apr. 1985, 67-A(4), 577-585.Applicant
- Carter, E.L., et al., “Field distributions in vertebral bodies of the rat during electrical stimulation: a parametric study,” IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., Mar. 1989, 36(3), 333-345.Applicant
- Goodman, R., et al., “Exposure of salivery gland cells to low-frequency electromagnetic fields alters polypeptide synthesis,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Jun. 1988, 85, 3928-3932.Applicant
- Goodwin, C.B., et al., “A double-blind study of capacitively coupled electrical stimulation as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusions,” Spine, 1999, 24(13), 1349-1356.Applicant
- Grodzinsky, A.J., “Electromechanical and physicochemical properties of connective tissue,” Crit. Rev. Biomed. Engng., 1983, 9(2), 133-198.Applicant
- Harrison, M.H.M., et al., “Use of pulsed electromagnetic fields in perthes disease: report of a pilot study,” J. Pediatr. Orthop., 1984, 4, 579-584.Applicant
- Jones, D.B., et al., “PEMF effects on differentiation and division in mirine melanoma cells are mediated indirectly through cAMP,” Trans. BRAGS 6, 1986, 51.Applicant
- Lorich, D.G., et al., “Biochemical pathway mediating the response of bone cells to capacitive coupling,” Clin. Orthop. and Related Res., 1998, 350, 246-256.Applicant
- Massardo, L., et al., “Osteoarthritis of the knee joint: an eight year prospective study,” Ann Rheum Dis., 1989, 48, 893-897.Applicant
- Mooney, V., “A randomized double-blind prospective study of the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic fields for inter body lumbar fusions,” Spine, 1990, 15(7), 708-712.Applicant
- Norton, L.A., et al., “Pulsed electromagnetic fields alter phenotypic expression in chondroblasts in tissue culture,” J. Orthop. Res., 1988, 6, 685-689.Applicant
- Pienkowski, D., et al., “Low-power electromagnetic stimulation of osteotomized rabbit fibuiae,” J. of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1994, 76-A(4), 489-501.Applicant
- Rodan, G.A., et al., “DNA synthesis in cartilage cells is stimulated by oscillating electric fields,” Science, Feb. 10, 1978, 199, 690-692.Applicant
- Ryaby, J.T., et al., “Pulsing electromagnetic fields affect the phosphorylation and expression of oncogene proteins,” Trans. BRAGS 6, 1986, p. 78.Applicant
- Ryaby, J.T., et al., “The effect of electromagnetic fields on protein phosphorylation and synthesis in murine melanoma cells,” BRAGS, p. 32.Applicant
- Wang, W., et al., “The increased level of PDGF-A constributes to the increased proliferation induced by mechanical stimulation in osteoblastic cells,” Biochem. And Molecular Biol. International, Oct. 1997, 43(2), 339-346.Applicant
- Wang, W., et al., “Up-regulation of chondrocyte matrix genes and products by electric fields,” Clin. Orthopaedics & Related Res., 2004, 427S, S163-S173.Applicant
- Zhuang, H., et al., “Electrical stimulation induces the level of TGF-β1 mRNA in osteoblastic cells by a mechanism involving calcium/calmodulin pathway,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1997, 237, 225-229.Applicant
- Zhuang, H., et al., “Mechanical strain-induced proliferation of osteoblastic cells parallels increased TGF-β1 mRNA,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1996, 229, 449-453.Applicant
- Brighton, C.T., et al., “Prevention and treatment of sciatic denervation disuse osteoporosis in rat tibia with capacitively coupled electrical stimulation,” Bone, 1985, 6, 87-97.Applicant
- Brighton, C.T., et al., “Treatment of nonunion of the tibia with a capacitively coupled electrical field,” J. of Trauma, 1984, 24(2), 153-155.Applicant
- Brighton, C.T., et al., “Tibial nonunion treated with direct current, capacitive coupling, or bone graft,” Clin. of Orthop. and Related Res., 1995, 321, 223-234.Applicant
- Heermeier, K., et al., “Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (EMF) on collagen type 1 mRNA expression and extracellular matrix synthesis of human osteoblastic cells,” Bioelectromagnetics, 1998, 19(4), 222-231.Applicant
- Pezzetti, F., et al., “Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on human chondrocytes: an in vitro study,” Calcif Tissue Int., 1999, 65(5), 396-401.Applicant