US 7,275,059 B2Grant
Methods and apparatus for high-speed access to and sharing of storage devices on a networked digital data processing system
Issue Date:2007-09-25
•37 Claims
•5 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A digital data processing system with improved access to information stored on a peripheral device is provided. A bypass mechanism, which executes on at least a first node (e.g., a client node), intercedes in the response to at least selected input/output, or access, requests generated by that node. The bypass transfers data designated by such requests between the first node and a peripheral device (e.g., a disk drive) over a third communications pathway, in lieu of transferring that data via a second node (e.g., a server node) and a first communications pathway (e.g., a network) between the first and second node and a second communications pathway between the second node and peripheral device. Such transfers by the bypass, however, are made using the administrative information maintained by the file system relating to storage of such data on the peripheral device.
Metadata
Assignee
- International Business Machines Corporation
Inventors
- Christopher J. Stakutis
- Kevin M. Stearns
Application Information
Application Number:US 10/691,134
Filing Date:2003-10-21
Priority Date:1997-12-31
Art Unit:2165
Classifications
IPC:
G06F17/30G06F15/16
Patent Drawings (5 sheets)
Description
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/708,785 filed on Nov. 8, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,694,317 which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/309,453 filed on May 11, 1999 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,161,104), which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/002,266 filed on Dec. 31, 1997 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,950,203).
Background of the Invention
[0002] The invention pertains to digital data processing and, more particularly, to high-speed access to and sharing of disk drives and other storage devices on a networked digital data processing system. The invention has application, for example, in accessing and sharing video, graphics and other large data files on a networked computer system.
[0003] In early computer systems, long-term data storage was typically accomplished via dedicated storage devices, such as tape and disk drives, connected to a data central computer. Requests to read and write data generated by applications programs were processed by special-purpose input/output routines resident in the computer operating system. With the advent of “time sharing” and other early multiprocessing techniques, multiple users could simultaneously store and access data—albeit only through the central storage devices.
[0004] With the rise of the personal computer (and workstation) in the 1980's, demand by business users led to development of interconnection mechanisms that permitted otherwise independent computers to access on one another's storage devices. Though computer “networks” had been known prior to this, they typically permitted only communications, not storage sharing.
[0005] Increases in the power of the personal computer is opening ever more avenues for their use. Video editing applications, for example, have until recently demanded specialized video production systems. Now, however, such applications can be run on high-end personal computers. By coupling these into a network, multiple users can share and edit a single video work.
[0006] Alas, network infrastructures have not kept pace with the computers which they connect. Though small data files can be transferred and shared quite effectively over conventional network interconnects, such as ethernet, these do not lend themselves to sharing and transferring large files. Thus, although users are accustomed to seemingly instantaneous file access over a network, it can take over an hour to transfer a 60 sec. video file that is 1.2 GBytes in length.
[0007] The prior art has developed interconnects that permit high-speed transfers to storage devices. The so-called fiber channel, for example, affords transfers at rates of up to 100 MBytes/sec—more than two orders of magnitude faster than conventional network interconnects. Although a single storage device may sport multiple fiber channel interfaces, no system has been developed to permit those workstations to share files on that storage device.
[0008] In view of the foregoing, an object of the invention is to provide improved digital data processing systems and, particularly, improved methods and apparatus of high-speed access to, and sharing of, disk drives and other storage devices on a networked computer system.
[0009] A related aspect of the invention is to provide such systems as can be implemented with minimum cost and maximum reliability.
[0010] Yet another object of the invention is to provide such systems as can be readily adapted to pre-existing data processing systems.
[0011] Yet still another object of the invention is to provide such systems as can be readily integrated with conventional operating system software and, particularly, conventional file systems and other input/output subsystems.
Summary of the Invention
[0012] The foregoing objects are among those attained by the invention, which provides novel methods and apparatus for sharing peripheral devices on a networked digital data processing system.
[0013] In one aspect, the invention provides a digital data processing system with improved access to information stored on a peripheral device. The system has a plurality of digital data processing nodes and a peripheral device. A first node (e.g., a “client” node) is connected to a second node (e.g., a “server” node) over a first communications pathway (e.g., a network). The second node is itself connected to the peripheral device (e.g., a disk drive) over a second communications pathway. The first node, too, is connected to the peripheral device, over a third communications pathway.
[0014] By way of non-limiting example, the first and second nodes can be a client and server networked to one another by Ethernet or other communications media, e.g., in a wide area network, local area network, the Internet interconnect, or other network arrangement. The server and client can be connected to the peripheral device, e.g., a disk drive, mass storage device or other mapped device, via a SCSI channel or other conventional peripheral device channel. Preferably, however, they are connected to the peripheral device via a fibre channel, “firewire” (i.e., IEEE 1394 bus), serial storage architecture (SSA) bus, high-speed Ethernet bus, high performance parallel interface (HPPI) bus or other high-speed peripheral device bus.
[0015] A file system, executing on the first and second nodes, is capable of responding to access requests generated by the first node for transferring data between that node and the peripheral device, via the second node and via the first and second communications pathways. The file system also maintains administrative information pertaining to storage on the peripheral device of data designated by such requests. That information includes, for example, physical storage location mappings (or “file maps”) for files and other data stored on the peripheral device. By way of example, the file system can represent the combined functionality of conventional local and network file systems, e.g., on Windows NT or UNIX client and server file systems.
[0016] A bypass mechanism, which executes on at least the first node, intercedes in the response to at least selected input/output, or access, requests generated by that node. The bypass transfers data designated by such requests between the first node and the peripheral device over the third communications pathway, in lieu of transferring that data via the second node and the first and second communications pathways. Such transfers by the bypass are made using the administrative information maintained by the file system relating to storage of such data on the peripheral device.
[0017] By way of example, the bypass can intercede in response to requests by the applications programs executing on the first node to read or write data on the peripheral device. Rather than permitting the file system to transfer that data via the first and second communications pathways, the bypass transfers it directly over the third communications pathway to the peripheral device. File mappings governing the physical locations at which the data is stored on the peripheral device are obtained from the second node.
[0018] Further aspects of the invention provide digital data processing systems as described above in which the bypass obtains such file mappings or other administrative information by applying further access requests to the file system. In one such aspect of the invention, the bypass issues two such requests. A first request causes the information to be retrieved into an actual or virtual (“ghost”) file local to the second node. A second request by the first node causes that information to be transferred over the network back to the first node.
[0019] In a related aspect of the invention, the bypass issues an access request, e.g., a file write, to a logical unit to which access is controlled by the second node. Data contained in that request identifies the file to which the original access request was directed and for which mappings are required. The logical unit specified in the further request can be, for example, a file on the peripheral device (e.g., other than file to which the original access request was directed) or, preferably, a “ghost” file. A second bypass, executing on the second node and coupled to the file system resident there, intercedes in response to that request by obtaining the file mappings from the second node. This is accomplished, for example, through issuance of a request to the local or network file system resident on the second node. The second bypass stores that information in the logical unit designated by the first request.
[0020] In further accord with this aspect of the invention, the first bypass issues a still further access request, e.g., file read, to the same logical unit. The server bypass can intercede in the file system's response to that request, e.g., where the logical unit is a ghost file, by causing the file system to pass back file mappings previously stored to the resident data structures.
[0021] In a related aspect of the invention, the client bypasses selectively limits transfers between their respective nodes and the peripheral device and, thereby, prevents the nodes from “hogging” that resource. Limiting can be accomplished, for example, using throttling limit or other numerical value specifying, e.g., a maximum quantity of data transfer by the respective node per unit time.
[0022] Still further aspects of the invention provide a scaleable networked digital data processing system comprising first and second nodes configured as described in which the first and second nodes are server nodes, each of which is coupled to one or more client nodes. Related aspects of the invention provide such a scaleable networked system comprising a third server node, itself coupled to one or more client nodes, as well as to the second node over a fourth communications pathway. As with the first node, the third node, too, includes a bypass that responds to requests generated by that node for transferring data designated thereby between the third node and the peripheral device over an additional communications pathway.
[0023] Still further aspects of the invention provide methods of operating digital data processing systems paralleling the operations described above.
Brief Description of the Illustrated Embodiment
[0024] A more complete understanding of the invention may be attained by reference to the drawings, in which
[0025] FIG. 1 depicts a scaleable networked digital data processing system configured in accord with the invention;
[0026] FIG. 2 depicts the software architecture of two nodes sharing a peripheral device in accord with the invention; and
[0027] FIGS. 3 and 4 show a messaging sequence illustrating a method of operating a digital data processing system in accord with the invention.
Detailed Description of the Illustrated Embodiment
[0028] FIG. 1 depicts a scaleable networked digital data processing system configured in accord with the invention. The system 10 includes a plurality of nodes 12 B 24, including two server nodes 18, 20 coupled via network pathways 26, 28 to client nodes 12 B 16 and 22 B 24, as shown. Server nodes 18, 20 are additionally coupled to one another via network pathway 27.
[0029] In the illustrated embodiment, nodes 12 B 24 represent digital data processing apparatus or other devices capable of being coupled to one another in a network and, more particularly, by way of example, in a client-server configuration. Illustrated server nodes 18, 20 represent mainframe computers, workstations, personal computers, or other digital data processing apparatus capable of providing server functions in such networks and, particularly, of controlling access to shared peripheral devices, such as storage device 36. Nodes 12 B 16 and 22 B 24 likewise represent workstations, personal computers, dedicated devices, or other digital data processing apparatus that generate requests for access to such shared peripheral devices.
[0030] The network pathways 26 B 28 represent wire cable interconnects, wireless interconnects, point-to-point interconnects, Internet interconnects or other digital communications interconnects of the type known in the art. Those pathways can be configured in any configuration that permits a node 12 B 16, 20 B 24 requesting access to a shared peripheral device 36 to communicate that request to a node 18 controlling access thereto. For purposes hereof and unless otherwise evident from context, such a requesting node is referred to as a “client,” regardless of its role (i.e., as a client or server) in the conventional network defined by nodes 12 B 18 and pathway 26, or nodes 20 B 24 and pathway 28. Thus, for example, node 18 could be a “client” to node 16 for purposes of sharing peripheral device 34, presuming an auxiliary connection (e.g., fibre channel) were provided between node 18 and that peripheral device.
[0031] In the illustrated embodiment, nodes 12 B 24 operate under the Microsoft Windows NT operating system, though those skilled in the art will appreciate that the nodes 12 B 24 may utilize other client and server operating systems, as well. Moreover, it will be appreciate that nodes need not utilize the same operating systems. Thus, for example, server 18 may operate as a Windows NT-based server, while server 20 operates as a UNIX-based server. The invention is therefore seen to have the advantage of permitting multiple nodes of different pedigrees, or operating system types, to share a common peripheral device.
[0032] With further reference to FIG. 1 , the nodes 12 B 24 are coupled to respective dedicated storage devices 30 B 42, as shown. Such couplings are provided by SCSI channels or other device interconnects suitable for permitting the nodes to transfer information with such devices. In addition to being coupled to their own dedicated storage devices 34, 38, nodes 16, 20 are coupled to the storage device 36 that is controlled by node 18. In the parlance of the invention, nodes 16, 20 are referred to as “clients” and node 18 is referred to as a “server.” Coupling between the clients 16, 20 and the shared peripheral device 36 can be provided by any conventional peripheral device interconnect, though, preferably, it is provided by high-speed interconnects such as fibre channel, “firewire” (i.e., IEEE 1394 bus), serial storage architecture (SSA) bus, high-speed Ethernet bus, high performance parallel interface (HPPI) bus or other high-speed peripheral device bus.
[0033] FIG. 2 depicts further detail of the hardware and software architecture permitting the sharing of peripheral device 36 by nodes 16, 18 in a system according to the invention. Though the discussion that follows is directed to sharing among these devices, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the teachings can be applied equally, e.g., to the sharing of device 38, by nodes 18, 20, the sharing of device 34 by nodes 16, 18, and so forth. Moreover, those teachings can be applied to create a scaleable network. To this end, additional server nodes, such as node 20, can be coupled to a common peripheral device 36, as well as to the node 18 which controls that device, to give still further nodes 22 B 24 to that device 36. Preferred uses of the invention are to permit two (or more) network client nodes, e.g., 14, 16, to share a common peripheral device, or to permit two (or more) network servers, e.g., 18, 20, to share such a device.
[0034] Referring to the drawing, nodes 16, 18 are coupled to one another via communications pathway 26 and to peripheral device 36 via pathways 44, 46, respectively. As noted above, pathway 44 (coupling device 18 to peripheral 36) can be a SCSI channel or other conventional peripheral device interconnect. Likewise, as noted above, pathway 46 (coupling device 16 to peripheral 36) can be a conventional peripheral device interconnect, though, preferably, is a high-speed interconnect such as fibre channel, “firewire” (i.e., IEEE 1394 bus), serial storage architecture (SSA) bus, high-speed Ethernet bus, high performance parallel interface (HPPI) bus or other high-speed peripheral device bus.
[0035] Executing on node 16 are one or more applications programs 48 (e.g., including video editing programs, image analysis programs, and so forth) that generate requests for access to local and networked peripheral devices, including shared device 36. Those applications programs execute in the conventional manner under the control of an operating system, e.g., Windows NT, which includes a file system that services those access requests.
[0036] In the illustration, that file system is represented by elements 50 B 54, including “upper” file system 50, representing the Windows NT I/O Subsystem Manager and other components responsible for interfacing with applications programs 48 and for routing peripheral device access requests to the file system; “lower” file system 52, representing the Windows NT File system drivers and intermediate drivers and other components responsible for local, disk-based file systems, SCSI drivers and the like providing generic functionality to a common set of devices; and drivers 54, representing software (and hardware) components for transferring information to and from attached peripheral devices 34, 36.
[0037] Because node 16 is a client vis-à-vis the Windows NT network, the drivers also include a network redirector, such as the Windows NT LANManRedirector, that transfers access requests to and from the shared peripheral device 36 via server node 18 and pathways 26 and 44. The node 18, which includes network server component 56, handles such requests in the conventional manner of a server of a networked digital data processing system. As illustrated, node 18 also includes a file system, comprising elements 58 B 64, whose operations parallel those of components 50 B 54 on the node 16.
[0038] Though the illustrated architecture for node 16 is in accord with that dictated by Windows NT, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be embodied in devices running under other operating systems, as well.
[0039] General computer networking provides a great many benefits of which a primary is having a common/central pool of storage that can be shared in a controlled manner between multiple nodes. That sharing takes place over a network communications pathway, such as a local area network (LAN), which is usually fast enough for only basic uses. Some uses, such as video or graphics or large numbers of connected users, however, can saturate a conventional network communications pathway.
[0040] Systems constructed and operated according to the invention allow multiple nodes to share a peripheral device without intervening communications pathways or nodes bottlenecking selected data transfers. A server node is still used in this “fused drive” approach to store physical file mappings and other administrative information B and to otherwise administer B the shared device. A direct connection, or “directly attached disk connect,” is also provided however between each node and the shared device to permit certain operations, e.g., bulk reads and writes, to be accomplished directly between the nodes and the peripheral device. The illustrated embodiments provide this capability through communications pathways such as pathway 46 and through filter drivers 66, 68 incorporated into the file systems. Among the many advantages of these systems is that they provide orders of magnitude performance improvements at virtually no additional hardware costs.
[0041] In the discussion that follows, systems according to the invention are variously referred to as “fused drive systems”, “fused drive technology”, “fused drive”, and the like. Unless otherwise evident from context, the term “file system” refers to the combined operation of the nodes' native file systems (e.g., comprising elements 50 B 54 and 56 B 64) and of the network server, e.g., 56., and file system, e.g., 56 B 64, of the node to which the shared peripheral device is assigned and of the file system, e.g., 50 B 54 of the node that shares that device.
[0042] Networking
[0043] To facilitate implementation of the invention, it is preferable that the underlying digital data processing system have at least basic networking capabilities that allows for the concept of Afile server@. Windows NT provides such an architecture. Programs can access files either locally or remotely through a variety of Windows general file specifications (e.g. “C:t.txt” where “C” is a local drive, or “H:t.txt=where “H” is mapped network drive, or “\\server\share\t.txt”, where >server=is another computer). This abstraction is successful because the applications software 48 need not know about the specifics of where a file resides in order to be able to access it through a well defined and globally supported set of commands.
[0044] File Map
[0045] In order to correctly intercept file reads and writes (to provide for acceleration), it is preferable to know exactly how each file is physically laid out on the shared peripheral device, e.g., disk 36. Application programs 48 make requests based on logical file blocks. The file system presents to an application 48 an abstraction of a file that appears to be a series of contiguous data blocks. In reality, the file system allocates physical pieces of the disk drives separately and knits them together in a variety of file system specific trees and directories and maps (and other structures). While a logical-block x might reside on physical block y, block x+1 might live an entirely different area.
[0046] As with other operating systems, Windows NT provides functions for interrogating the physical allocation map of a file. These are provided primarily for the handful of programs that actually need to understand such things (e.g., disk defragmenters). Without this map, it might be possible to build a map of file blocks by understanding the NTFS data structures and traversing many native file structures.
[0047] Volume Serial Number
[0048] Systems according to the invention provide two paths to the shared storage, e.g., device 36: one path is via the directly attached media wire, e.g., 46, and the other path is through conventional networking, e.g., 26, to the other node, e.g., 18, that has direct access. “Fusing” a drive in accord with the invention requires intercepting important I/O commands an issuing them locally. But to which local device?
[0049] Each disk volume, e.g., 36, has a A volume serial number@ that NT places on the volume. When an applications program 48 or user makes a request to “fuse” a volume, the illustrated system locates the correct locally attached volume by examining the volume serial number.
[0050] File System Filters
[0051] Most modern operating systems are put together in well defined layers and those layers are allowed to have well defined pieces (developed by “third parties”) plug into them to extend functionality. The most common example is a add-on board, e.g. a video board, and needs some special software to handle the board details yet presents a standard interface to the rest of the operating system so that software written to the generic abilities will work with the new device.
[0052] Windows NT at a very fundamental layer abstracts all devices; that is, any device (be it a physical adapter or a software device) winds up having an entity in the NT system known as a Adevice@. A device supports a well defined interface and all implementations of a device must provide appropriate code for the planned interface points.
[0053] What is significant is that NT supports Alayering@ a device. This means providing an ability to intercept any and all transactions to a device and possibly introduce additional processing. A layered device driver can do any of the following per function: handle the function entirely itself and dismiss it; do some pre-processing and then let the natural function take over; do post processing (after the natural function).
[0054] The illustrated embodiment exploits this structuring opportunity. That is, in general the goal is to let as much of regular processing happen so that all the natural benefits are realized (security, sharing, etc), and only accelerate certain important features.
[0055] The NT function IO AttachDevice is used to perform the layering.
[0056] NT Device Types
[0057] There are many different extensions of the base Adriver@ class in NT. The following are the ones that are interesting for solving this problem:
-
- [0058] FileSystemDevice
- [0059] FileSystemRecognizer
- [0060] LANMANRedirector
[0061] NT typically supports two main file system types: NTFS and FAT. Each A volume@ in the NT system (e.g. AC: @) is an instance of a FileSystemDevice. NT provides a generic file sub-system interface for applications (e.g. open( ), read( ), write( )). NT will then call the appropriate file system-specific routines based on the target. There is a Aclass@ (a driver) for each type of file system present (e.g. NTFS class, FAT class, etc), and a separate Ainstance@ of that class for each and every volume (e.g. C:, D:, E:).
[0062] There is a pseudo device called the FileSystemRecognizer. Whenever NT mounts a file system (typically at boot time), NT determines which class needs to manage it, and then provides that class an opportunity to deal with it. NT provides a mechanism to inform other system elements of this mounting (or unmounting). That mechanism is through the pseudo device FileSystemRecognizer. One of the particular entry points for the FileSystemRecognizer provides details regarding volumes that are being mounted or dismounted. Thus, a layered driver on top of this device could then be made aware of such events taking place.
[0063] It is preferable for the illustrated embodiment to intercept and thus know about all system mount/unmount activity. Information such as the volume label and physical device elements is important to note for subsequent tasks.
[0064] On the “client” side, e.g., on the node 16 that accesses the shared peripheral device but that does not inherently control it, the driver 66 intercepts volume mounts and dismounts. It may disallow some volumes from mounting, e.g., perhaps due to security settings, or other issues such as multi-writers. If allowed to mount, the driver 66 will capture the volume label (and signature which is volume unique) and other pertinent information. This data is stored in a globally available area the server driver 68 can use when necessary. During a dismount, this information is discarded.
[0065] For whatever reason, network mapped devices (which appear as a mounted file system to the casual NT user), do not go through this mount/dismount notification process. The illustrate embodiment needs to be aware of network mounted file systems so that it can have an opportunity to accelerate some of their functions. For this purpose, it layers on top of the separate driver class called LANMANRedirector that essentially manages NT=s LAN Manger mounted volumes (which is the typical network file system mounter that comes with NT).
[0066] Overall Flow Summary
[0067] In general networking there is typically a concept of a Aserver@ machine and many clients that are attached to that server. The server Aserves@ tasks to the clients and one of the most typical tasks is serving file data. Mapped file systems allow a client to pretend that a disk that is physically mounted on a Aserver@ machine to seem mounted on the client as well. The network and operating systems will cooperate to manage that illusion and transparently feed data back and forth between the machines.
[0068] Though the invention can be implemented to achieve a client-server relationship between the devices, e.g., 16, 18, that share a peripheral device, e.g., 36, it does not necessitate such a relationship. That is, there is no requirement for a single machine to be the data master of all transactions. However, there is a concept of a master writer, e.g., node 18, and for simplicity sake this document will refer to that machine as the Aserver@ for a particular volume.
[0069] In the illustrated embodiment, all participating machines, e.g., 16, 18, have a direct connection to the shared peripheral device, e.g., 36, and thus they all have the opportunity to mount the volumes as local volumes (and conceivably at the same time). Because of cache coherency issues, it is necessary to insist that only a single machine be a real Awriter@ (server) of a volume at a time and that proper cache flushing take place between ownership changes.
[0070] The illustrated embodiments route some requests through the regular networking technology and others are by-passed and go directly to the attached storage interface. Thus, accessing the shared device, e.g., 36, will in fact result in some amount of network activity and thus some amount of impact on another machine (that is Aserving@ the interface to that storage volume).
[0071] The term Aserver@, as used herein and unless otherwise evident from context, means Athe machine that is serving the needs regarding a particular volume@, but does not mean Athe machine that serves all the needs of a set of volumes@ necessarily. A peer-to-peer arrangement is both possible and beneficial wherein each participant is a primary writer (server) for some volumes, and a client for the others. The reality is that the number of bytes transferred over the conventional network is insignificant in comparison to the number Aaccelerated@ to the direct attached interface.
[0072] Preliminary Configuration Issues
[0073] In order to implement the invention, it is required that all participating nodes, e.g., 16, 18, be coupled to the shared device, e.g., 36, preferably by a direct attached interface, such as Fibre Channel, or the like, and that they can Amount@ that device locally. It is also required that all participants, e.g., 16, 18, be in communication with each other over regular networking, e.g., 26, and that the regular network protocols be present that allow for mounting remote file systems.
[0074] The illustrated embodiment receives a request to Afuse@ a particular volume, e.g., device 36, from the user or from an applications program 48. In order to proceed with this, it must know which node is to be the real Aserver@ of that volume.
[0075] Booting
[0076] When each node, e.g., 16, 18, is first booted, the local file system filter driver, e.g., 66, 68, is loaded and Alayered@ on top of the FileSystemRecognizer and is thus apprised about the mounting/unmounting of volumes. Each time a volume is mounted, it will record information about that volume for possible later use (e.g., in a global data structure) and also install the filter for that particular FileSystemDevice. The driver, e.g., 66, also layers on top of the LANMANRedirector and is thus apprised of all activities related to mapped drives. The mounting of a volume that will be “fused” in accord with the invention is shown in FIG. 3 , step (1).
[0077] When a Amake fused@ request comes in (e.g., from a configuration program), the local filter driver, e.g., 66, takes the following actions:
[0078] 1) It issues a request to the resident portion of the file system to create a mapped device for it (e.g. M:);
[0079] 2) When the file system completes the mapping, it performs Amount@ and the local driver, e.g., 66 receives control (due to the layering on the LANMANRedirector);
[0080] 3) The local filter driver then checks the specifics of this network volume being mounted (specifically the volume signature) and compares that to all local volumes that it has access to. If it finds a match, then it knows it has an alternative (and higher performance path) to that same storage and records this information in global structures for subsequent transactions to exploit.
[0081] The aforementioned actions are represented in FIG. 3 , as step (3).
[0082] Network Mapping
[0083] The natural course is for there soon to be some accesses of this newly created network device, e.g., peripheral device 26. All accesses of all network devices go through the filter driver, e.g., 66, that is layered on the LANMANRedirector.
[0084] ACreateFile( )@ is the Windows function for opening files (among other things) and is a required first step before files can be read or written. The opening of a file on the fused drive is indicated by step (4) in FIG. 3 .
[0085] When CreateFile is called on client node 16, the client filter driver 66 interrogates the specifics of the file name and determines whether the file being accessed lives on a volume that is Afused@. If so, the filter driver 66 needs to procure the information about how the file is physically laid out on the device so that subsequent read/write calls can go directly to the shared peripheral 36.
[0086] Referring to step (5) of FIG. 3 , it gathers this information by sending a request to the real Awriter@ (server), e.g., 18, of that volume. Specifically, the filter driver 66 writes a request into a specific file (the Aghost@ file) on an actual or virtual device controlled by the server, e.g., 18. That write request includes the name of the file referenced in the intercepted CreateFile( ) call. In a preferred embodiment, the aforementioned ghost file is so named because it doesn=t really exist; rather, accesses to and from it on the server side are intercepted by the filter driver 58.
[0087] Server Side
[0088] The filter driver, e.g., 68, resident on the server, e.g., 18, detects the request and determines the details of the file layout. As shown in step (6) of FIG. 3 , it first obtains the name of the file by reading the ghost file. In step (7), it then calls a Windows NT function that is provided for defragmenter packages and other disk-optimizing utilities to obtain the file layout. To insure coherency, whenever a file map is requested, the server driver 68 also issues a local Apurge@ call to remove any material regarding that file in its own local caches.
[0089] In step (8), the server filter driver 68 then writes that information back to the ghost file. This, in turn, is read by the client filter driver 66. See step (9). When the map comes back, the client filter driver 66 stores in a global data structure to be exploited by subsequent read and write calls.
[0090] Reads and Writes
[0091] In step (10) of FIG. 4 , an applications program 48 on the client node 16 attempts to read a file on the shared device 36. Upon intercepting that request, the client filter driver 66 interrogates the global data structures to determine if the request is directed to a file for which mapping information is present. If so, previously stored the map is interrogated to determine the physical blocks needed from the device 36 to fulfill the request. The blocks are then read via the direct interconnection pathway, e.g., 46, and the request is dismissed (and no network transactions take place). See step (11).
[0092] As shown in steps (12) B (13), a similar sequence is effected when an applications program 48 on the client node 16 attempts to write a file on the shared device, e.g., 36. However, any time such a file=s allocation is extended, the allocation request is permitted to take the normal network path (e.g., via network communications pathway 26) for servicing by the network server 56 and file system resident on the server node 18. Once that is completed, another mapping is obtained as described above. In one embodiment of the invention, the client filter driver 66 forces any such allocations to be much larger so that they happen less frequently. File writes then can take place in the same way that file reads do (using the map to determine the actual blocks to locally write).
[0093] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the client filter driver 66 can limit the respective node=s access to the shared device 36 via the auxiliary pathway 44. This prevents the node 16 from Ahogging@ the device 36 to the exclusion of the other nodes. Limiting can be accomplished by tracking the number of bytes transferred, or the number of accesses made, by node 16 over pathway 44 per unit time. If that number exceeds a predetermined numerical Athrottling@ limit, the driver 66 can delay responding to a newly intercepted request or route it for handling by the server 18 as a conventional network request.
[0094] Normal Activities
[0095] Apart from file reads and writes, the filter drivers 66, 68 permit all other file activities to go through the normal networking interfaces. These include security checks, time and date stamps, directory look ups, etc. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that reads and writes account for the grand majority of the total number of bytes that would have passed through the network and, hence, by handling separately in the manner discussed above, the invention achieves great speed increases.
[0096] Specifics of Startup
[0097] The filter drivers 66, 68 are essentially device drivers and are started in the normal operating system device context (system boot time). This is the desired time for the software to Ahook@ (layer) into the other devices that it needs to have control over. The drivers 66, 68 can correctly layer into the FileSystemRecognizer device at this time, but cannot do so for the LANMANRedirector (due to some internal NT restrictions). So, accompanying software start up a system thread that politely Apolls@ for the existence of the LANMANRedirector (which will happen shortly after boot) and, once discovered, perform the normal layering.
[0098] An important part of the driver filter 66, 68 operation at boot time is to prevent any of the shared storage drives from mounting. In normal situations, NT attempts to mount all directly attached storage (and knows nothing natively about the fact that this storage may be already in use or mounted on another system). If NT were allowed to mount a shared device, and there were Awrites@ taking place to that drive from another system, NT would be confused and would attempt a Arollback@ operation, wiping out any data written recently written (this is a recovery procedure that needs to be done in the event of an abrupt shutdown and is inappropriate in a shared disk environment).
[0099] Described herein are methods and apparatus meeting the objects set forth above. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the illustrated embodiment is shown and described merely by way of example and that other embodiments incorporating changes therein fall within the scope of the invention, of which we claim:
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. A digital data processing method comprising
responding to a request for access to a peripheral device by at least initiating transfer of data designated by that request over a communications pathway that does not include a node that controls access to the peripheral device;
the initiating step including at least initiating transfer of the data using administrative information obtained from the node pertaining to storage of data on the peripheral device;
wherein responding to the request comprises a bypass, interceding in response to the request for access to the peripheral device applied thereby to the node that controls such access to the peripheral device.
2. A digital data processing method comprising
responding to a request (“first access request”) by a first node for access to a peripheral device by at least initiating transfer of data designated by that request between the first node and the peripheral device over a communications pathway that does not include a second node that controls access by at least the first node to the peripheral device;
the initiating step including at least initiating transfer of the data using administrative information obtained from the second node pertaining to storage of data on the peripheral device;
wherein responding to the request comprises a bypass, interceding in response to the request for access by the first node to the peripheral device applied thereby to the second node that controls such access to the peripheral device.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the first node is a client node and the second node is a server node.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the initiating step includes at least initiating transfer of the data designated by the first access request between the first node and the peripheral device over a communications pathway that differs from that over which a file system executing on at least one of the first and second nodes would transfer data in response to the first access request.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the initiating step includes at least initiating transfer of the data designated by the first access request to physical storage locations on the peripheral device determined from the administrative information.
6. The method of claim 5, comprising obtaining as administrative information a map indicative of physical locations at which the data are stored on the peripheral device.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the responding step comprises obtaining the map by generating and applying to the file system a second access request.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the second access request is for access to a logical unit to which access is controlled by the second node.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the second request is for access to a logical unit other than a file designated in the first access request.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the second access request is a request to write a file.
11. The method of claim 2, wherein the initiating step includes at least initiating transfer of the data designated by the first access request between the first node and the peripheral device via a directly attached disk connect.
12. The method of claim 2, wherein the initiating step includes at least initiating transfer of the data designated by the first access request between the first node and the peripheral device via fibre channel.
13. The method of claim 2, wherein the initiating step includes at least initiating transfer of the data designated by the request via a direct connection between the first node and the peripheral device, wherein the direct connection comprises any of a fibre channel, a firewire bus, a serial storage architecture (SSA) bus, a high-speed Ethernet bus, a high performance parallel interface (HPPI) bus, and other high-speed peripheral device bus.
14. A digital data processing method accessing a peripheral device, the method comprising
intercepting, with a filter driver executing on a first node, a request (“first access request”) by that node for access to the peripheral device,
at least initiating transfer of the data designated by that request between the first node and the peripheral device using file mapping obtained from a second node;
wherein the initiating step includes at least initiating transfer of data designated by the first access request between the first node and the peripheral device over a communications pathway that differs from that over which a file system executing on at least one of the first and second nodes would transfer data in response to the first access request.
15. The method of claim 14, comprising obtaining the file mapping by sending a request (“second access request”) to the second node for access to a logical unit other than a file designated in the first access request.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the logical unit is a file that resides on a peripheral device local to the first node.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein the second access request is a request to write a file.
18. The method of claim 15, comprising generating and applying to the file system a third access request, the third request designating the logical unit designated by the second access request.
19. The method of claim 14, wherein the first node is a client node and the second node is a server node.
20. The method of claim 14, wherein the initiating step includes at least initiating transfer of data designated by the first access request between the first node and the peripheral device via a directly attached disk connect.
21. The method of claim 14, wherein the initiating step includes at least initiating transfer of data designated by the request via a direct connection between the first node and the peripheral device, wherein the direct connection comprises any of a fibre channel, a firewire bus, a serial storage architecture (SSA) bus, a high-speed Ethernet bus, a high performance parallel interface (HPPI) bus, and other high-speed peripheral device bus.
22. A digital data processing method of accessing a peripheral device, the method comprising
responding to a request (“first access request”) by a first node for access to the peripheral device by bypassing, at least in part, a file system that would otherwise respond to the first access request by transferring data designed thereby the between the first node and the peripheral device over a communications pathway that includes a second node that controls access by the first node and one or more other nodes to the peripheral device;
the responding step including at least initiating transfer of data designated by the first access request between the first node and the peripheral device over a communications pathway that does not include the second node;
the initiating step including at least initiating transfer of the data using administrative information obtained from the second node pertaining to storage of data on the peripheral device.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein the initiating step includes at least initiating transfer of the data designated by the first access request to physical storage locations on the peripheral device determined from the administrative information.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein the responding step comprises obtaining as administrative information a map indicative of physical locations at which the data are stored on the peripheral device.
25. A bypass for use in a first node to improve access to information stored on a peripheral device, the bypass comprising
a first filter driver executing within and coupled to a file system of the first node, the filter driver responding to a request (“first access request”) generated within the first node for access to the peripheral device by at least initiating transfer of data designated by that request between the first node and the peripheral device using administrative information obtained from a second node that controls access by the first node and one or more other nodes to the peripheral device,
the filter driver at least initiating the transfer via a communications pathway that does not include the second node;
wherein responding to the request comprises a bypass, interceding in response to the request for access by the first node to the peripheral device applied thereby to the second node that controls access to the peripheral device.
26. The bypass of claim 25, wherein the first filter driver wherein obtains as administrative information a map indicative of physical locations at which the data are stored on the peripheral device.
27. The bypass of claim 25, comprising a second filter driver executing within and coupled to a file system of the second node.
28. The bypass of claim 27, wherein the second filter driver generates the map in response to a further access request generated by the first filter driver.
29. The bypass of claim 25, wherein the first filter driver obtains the map by generating a request (“second access request”) to the second node for access to a logical unit other than a file designated in the first access request.
30. The bypass of claim 29, wherein the logical unit is a file that resides on a peripheral device local to the first node.
31. The bypass of claim 30, wherein the second access request is a request to write a file.
32. The bypass of claim 25, wherein the first filter driver selectively issues a request to the file system of the first node to create a mapped device corresponding to the peripheral device.
33. The bypass of claim 32, wherein the first filter driver compares information regarding a network volume being mounted to local volumes to which the first filter driver has access to determine whether a communications pathway exists for transfer of data between the first node and the peripheral device that does not include the second node.
34. The bypass of claim 33, wherein the communications pathway over which the first filter driver transfers data designated by the first access request differs from that over which a file system executing on at least one of the first node and the second node would transfer data in response to the first access request.
35. The bypass of claim 33, wherein the communications pathway over which the first filter driver transfers data designated by the first access request is a direct connection.
36. The bypass of claim 35, wherein communications pathway over which the first filter driver transfers data designated by the first access request comprises a fibre channel.
37. The bypass of claim 35, communications pathway over which the first filter driver transfers data designated by the first access request comprises any of a fibre channel, a firewire bus, a serial storage architecture (SSA) bus, high-speed Ethernet bus, high performance parallel interface (HPPI) bus, and other high-speed peripheral device bus.
Patent Citations (62)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US5014197(A) | 1991-05-01 | Wolf | Applicant |
| US5129088(A) | 1992-07-01 | Auslander et al. | Applicant |
| US5163156(A) | 1992-11-01 | Leung et al. | Applicant |
| US5193168(A) | 1993-03-01 | Corrigan et al. | Applicant |
| US5218676(A) | 1993-06-01 | Ben-Ayed et al. | Applicant |
| US5218697(A) | 1993-06-01 | Chung | Applicant |
| US5247660(A) | 1993-09-01 | Ashcraft et al. | Applicant |
| US5313631(A) | 1994-05-01 | Kao | Applicant |
| US5359725(A) | 1994-10-01 | Garcia et al. | Applicant |
| US5367698(A) | 1994-11-01 | Webber et al. | Applicant |
| US5374928(A) | 1994-12-01 | Moore et al. | Applicant |
| US5388243(A) | 1995-02-01 | Glider et al. | Applicant |
| US5463381(A) | 1995-10-01 | Ryu et al. | Applicant |
| US5463754(A) | 1995-10-01 | Beausoleil et al. | Applicant |
| US5530857(A) | 1996-06-01 | Gimza | Applicant |
| US5530905(A) | 1996-06-01 | Nichols et al. | Applicant |
| US5535406(A) | 1996-07-01 | Kolchinsky | Applicant |
| US5537574(A) | 1996-07-01 | Elko et al. | Applicant |
| US5566331(A) | 1996-10-01 | Irwin, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5577240(A) | 1996-11-01 | Demers et al. | Applicant |
| US5592612(A) | 1997-01-01 | Birk | Applicant |
| US5604862(A) | 1997-02-01 | Midgely et al. | Applicant |
| US5649194(A) | 1997-07-01 | Miller et al. | Applicant |
| US5657450(A) | 1997-08-01 | Rao et al. | Applicant |
| US5673382(A) | 1997-09-01 | Cannon et al. | Applicant |
| US5675798(A) | 1997-10-01 | Chang | Applicant |
| US5689700(A) | 1997-11-01 | Miller et al. | Applicant |
| US5692128(A) | 1997-11-01 | Bolles et al. | Applicant |
| US5692178(A) | 1997-11-01 | Shaughnessy | Applicant |
| US5734828(A) | 1998-03-01 | Pendse et al. | Applicant |
| US5737536(A) | 1998-04-01 | Herrmann et al. | Applicant |
| US5740371(A) | 1998-04-01 | Wallis | Applicant |
| US5751997(A) | 1998-05-01 | Kullick et al. | Applicant |
| US5768528(A) | 1998-06-01 | Stumm | Applicant |
| US5774670(A) | 1998-06-01 | Montulli | Applicant |
| US5787403(A) | 1998-07-01 | Randle | Applicant |
| US5806085(A) | 1998-09-01 | Berliner | Applicant |
| US5812754(A) | 1998-09-01 | Lui et al. | Applicant |
| US5842211(A) | 1998-11-01 | Horadan et al. | Applicant |
| US5909689(A) | 1999-06-01 | Van Ryzin | Applicant |
| US5913028(A) | 1999-06-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US5943688(A) | 1999-08-01 | Fisher et al. | Applicant |
| US5950203(A) | 1999-09-01 | Stakuis et al. | Examiner |
| US6067545(A) | 2000-05-01 | Wolff | Applicant |
| US6084892(A) | 2000-07-01 | Benash et al. | Applicant |
| US6085246(A) | 2000-07-01 | Brandt et al. | Applicant |
| US6161104(A) | 2000-12-01 | Stakutis et al. | Examiner |
| US6694317(B1) | 2004-02-01 | Stakutis et al. | Examiner |
| EP66039(B1) | 1985-08-01 | Applicant | |
| EP476962(A2) | 1992-03-01 | Applicant | |
| EP507503(A2) | 1992-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EP664506(A2) | 1995-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EP312786(B1) | 1995-12-01 | Applicant | |
| EP460602(B1) | 1998-03-01 | Applicant | |
| EP566895(B1) | 1999-05-01 | Applicant | |
| JP1008433 | 1989-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP5181735 | 1993-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO89/10594 | 1989-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO93/08530 | 1993-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO95/21416 | 1995-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO95/23376 | 1995-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO94/18630 | 1999-08-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (138)
- Gibson et al., File Server Scaling with Network-Attached Secure Disks, Jun. 1997 ACM, pp. 272-284.Examiner
- Meter et al., VISA: Netstations Virtual Internet SCSI Adapter, 1998 ACM, pp. 71-80.Examiner
- Meter et al., Response to the Collapsed LAN, DARPA, pp. 1-2.Examiner
- Bal, Guangyi, et al. “Implementation and Performance Evaluation of a Distributed Paged-Object Storage Server,” IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems vol. E78-D, No. 11 (Nov. 1995) pp. 1439-1448.Applicant
- Boku, T. “The technology of cache and virtual storage,” Joho Shori (Japan) vol. 33, No. 11 (Nov. 1992) pp. 1348-1357.Applicant
- Corbett, Peter F., et al. “The Vesta Parallel File System,” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems vol. 14, No. 3 (Aug. 1996) pp. 225-264.Applicant
- “Dynamically Partitioning DASD Storage Among Concurrent Processes,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin vol. 36, Pub. No. 2 93A 60360 (Feb. 1993).Applicant
- Fach, R., et al. “A Fast Storage Method for Disc Files,” Rechentechnik Datenverarbeitung vol. 16, No. 1 (Jan. 1979) pp. 13-14.Applicant
- Malinconico, S. Michael. “Mass Storage Technology and File Organization,” Journal of Library Automation vol. 13 No. 2 (Jun. 1980) pp. 77-87.Applicant
- Myslewski, Rik, et al. “The Future of Storage,” MacUser (May 1997) pp. 62-69.Applicant
- Nagatani, Kazuyuki. “Compact Mass Storage Subsystem with Magnetic Tape Auto-handling,” Japan Telecommunication Review vol. 28 No. 3 (Jul. 1986) pp 205-210.Applicant
- Pezarro, M. T. “A note on estimating hit ratios for direct-access storage devices,” The Computer Journal vol. 19 No. 3 (Aug. 1976) pp. 271-272.Applicant
- Phillips, Barry. “Have Storage Area Networks Come of Age?” Computer (Jul. 1998) pp. 10-12.Applicant
- Poultney, John. “Alternative LANs push multimedia speed limits,” MacWeek vol. 9 No. 28 (Jul. 17, 1995) pp. 16 and 18.Applicant
- “Relative Block Addressing in an Advanced Technology Integrated Device Electronics File Subsystem,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin vol. 36, Pub. No. 9B 93A 62384 (Sep. 1993).Applicant
- Soltis, Steven R. “The Design and Implementation of a Distributed File System based on Shared Network Storage,” Ph.D. Thesis (University of Minnesota) Aug. 1997.Applicant
- Zimmerman, J. et al. “Design, Implementation and Management of Rules in an Active Database System,” Database and Expert Systems Applications, 7th International Conference DEXA '96 Proceedings, Berlin 1996, pp. 422-435.Applicant
- “Sonic Solutions Debuts Sonic Lightspeed; High-performance Fibre Channel-based Storage System for Media Worksgroups Speeds Professional Video and Audio Production,” Business Wire (Sep. 10, 1998) p. 09100250 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Dolby Laboratories and Sonic Solutions announce certification of Sonic DND Creator Dolby Digital Encoder; First workstation-based digital audio encoder to receive Dolby approval,” Business Wire (Jun. 25, 1997) p. 09250008 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Sonic Debuts Premastering System for DVD 1.0 Enables Production Facilities to Begin Full-Scale DVD Production,” Business Wire (Sep. 19, 1996) p. 09190025 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Apple and IBM Join Sonic Solutions DVD Production Alliance Preparing DVD Titles for Multimedia PC Playback,” Business Wire (Sep. 11, 1996) p. 09110163 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Sonic Solutions Announces Collaboration with Nexus and NPR; Will Deliver Integrated Workgroup Tools for Radio Broadcast,” Business Wire (May 13, 1996) p. 05130183 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Sonic Solutions Debuts Sonic Lightspeed; High-performance Fibre Channel-based Storage System for Media Workgroups Speeds Professional Video and Audio Production,” Business Wire (Sep. 10, 1998) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Dolby Laboratories and Sonic Solutions announce certification of Sonic DVD Creator Dolby Digital Encoder; First workstation-based digital audio encoder to receive Dolby approval,” Business Wire (Jun. 25, 1997) p. 6250008 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Birkmaier, Craig. “Distributed File Sharing: Medianet and SCSI-Net Facilitate Work . . . ,” Videography vol. 20 No. 4 (Apr. 1995) p. 52(3) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Highlights from the exhibition . . . ” Seybold Report on Publishing Systems vol. 25 No. 2 (Sep. 19, 1995) p. S10(29) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Transmitting large color files . . . ” Seybold Report on Publishing Systems vol. 24 No. 3 (Oct. 26, 1994) p. T60(5) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Hardware: platforms and products . . . ” Seybold Report on Publishing Systems vol. 23 No. 16 (May 10, 1994) p. S78(4) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Apple and IBM Join Sonic Solutions DVD Production,” M2 Presswire (Sep. 12, 1996) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Garvey, Martin J. “The Network Is the Storage—Faster, cheaper, easier than conventional Unix Servers, dedicated ‘fiber’ are catching on with demanding users,” Informationweek No. 661 (1997) p. 131(Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “All Roads Lead to Resellers as Solutions Vehicle,” Computer Reseller News No. 766 (1997) p. 184 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Wirbel, Loring. “Networking Equipment—Gadzoox networks' denali bridges two worlds—Fibre Channel arbitrated-loop switch unveiled,” Electronic Engineering Times No. 982 (1997) p. 88 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Carr, Jim. “Fibre Channel—VARs turn to Fibre Channel for bandwidth on the back end,” Varbusiness No. 1320 (1997) p. 171 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Wirbel, Loring., “Standard shows signs of market maturity—Fibre Channel expands from loop to switch apps,” Electronic Engineering Times No. 980 (1997) p. 20 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Garvey, Martin J. “Enterprise Computing—High-Fiber Storage—Fibre Channel is changing the face of storage-and attracting big-name vendors,” Informationweek No. 653 (1997) p. 18 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- MacLellan, Andrew. “Compaq selects HP's Fibre Channel chip for its new servers,” Electronic Buyer's News No. 1070 (1997) p. 10 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Brocade SilkWorm,” Computer Reseller News No. 731 (1997) p. 73 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Spang, Kelly. “Fibre Channel collaboration—Vendors team up to offer starter kit for configuring two-host gigabit-speed SAN,” Computer Reseller News No. 727 (1997) p. 157 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Lazar, Jerry. “Optimem Adds Optical Jukebox,” Computer Systems News No. 510 (1991) p. 23 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Mgm't for Netware,” Communicationsweek No. 374 (1991) p. 13 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Vixel-Arcxel Merger Adds Competition to Fibre Switch Market,” Computergram International No. 3363 (Mar. 9, 1998) p. CGN03090006 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Gaszoox expands storage area network product offerings,” Network vol. 13 No. 3 (Feb. 1998) p. 119 (1) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Kingsley, Lawrence. “Networking update: get off your haunches . . . ” Seybold Report on Internet Publishing vol. 2 No. 3 (Nov. 1997) p. 20(5) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Fibre Channel: Norwest Venture Capital invests $5.8 million in Brocade Communications,” EDGE: Work-Group Computing Report vol. 8 (Dec. 8, 1997) p. 15 (1) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Wirbel, Loring. “Fibre Channel arbitrated-loop switch unveiled.” Electronic Engineering Times No. 982 (Nov. 24, 1997) p. 88 (1) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Comdex show—a bountiful presentation.” Electronic News vol. 43 No. 2195 (1991) p. 70 (1) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Networking Roundup—Gadzoox Intros Denali Area Switch,” Newsbytes (Nov. 11, 1997) p. NEW11110012 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Fibre Channel: HP and Crossroads sign Fibre Channel-to-SCSI agreement.” EDGE: Work-Group Computing Report vol. 8 (Nov. 3, 1997) p. 14(1) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Pendery, David. “Storage market finds Fibre.” InfoWorld vol. 19 No. 38 (Sep. 22, 1997) p. 45(1) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Fibre Channel: Brocade unveils the industry's first Fibre Channel gigabit siwtch that will allow users to build a Fabric for the emerging server-strorage area network,” EDGE: Work-Group Computing Report vol. 8 (Mar. 31, 1997) p. 2(1) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Networking Roundup—Gigabit-Speed Fibre Channel Starter Kit.” Netwsbytes (Mar. 6, 1997) p. NEW03060012 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “PC storage grows up,” IBM System User vol. 15 No. 7 (Jul. 1994) p. S31(4) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Eckerson, Wayne. “IBM, Oracle lead software firms in UniForum debuts,” Network World vol. 10 No. 12 (Mar. 22, 1993) p. 6(1) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Bass, Brad. “Agencies explore storage for LANs,” Federal Computer Week vol. 6 No. 36 (Dec. 7, 1992) p. 36(2) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Sullivan, Kristina B. “Show spotlight falls on CD ROM; DEC, others unveil drives, software at CD-ROM Expo,” PCWeek vol. 8 No. 42 (Oct. 21, 199) p. 29(2) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Storag systems,” LAN Times vol. 8 No. 16 (Aug. 26, 1991) p. 241(9) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Lawrence, Bill. “Introduction to Novell NetWare: team the essentials of the leading network operating system,” Lotus vol. No. 9 (Sep. 1990) p. 52(4) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Brennan, Laura. “User's disk wishes are coming true: smaller, lower priced, more memory,” PCWeek vol. 4 No. 43 (Oct. 27, 1987) p. 140(2) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Jones, Del. “Advances in massive storage mean increased benefits for local networks,” PCWeek vol. 4 No. 39 (Sep. 29, 1987) p. C29(1) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Axner, David. “Gigabit Ethernet: a technical assessment,” Telecommunications vol. 31 No. 3 (Mar. 1997) p. 31(4) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “1996 Index,” LAN Magazine vol. 11 No. 13 (Dec. 1996) p. 149(10) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Streeter, April. “New Gigabit Ethernet gains industry support,” MacWEEK vol. 10 No. 40 (Oct. 21, 1996) p. 28(2) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Wong, William. “Switching to switching . . . ” Network VAR vol. 4 No. 5 (May 1996) p. 35(6) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Shipley, Buddy. “Ethernet's endurance contest,” LAN Magazine vol. 11 No. 5 (May 1996) p. 67(9) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Kjos, Todd J. et al. “Hardware cache coherent input/output . . . ” Newlett-Packard Journal vol. 47 No. 1 (Feb. 1996) p. 52(8) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Correla, Edward J. “Technology Closeup: Lighting the Way to Super-Fast ‘Storage-Networks’—How Fibre Channel sets the wire ablaze,” Computer Reseller News No. 762 (1997) p. 244 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Miastkowski, Stan. “Switching to the Future—The latest generation of Fast Ethernet switches offers solutions to fit your company and budget,” Communicationsweek No. 658 (1997) p. 56 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Medford, Casismir. “Switching Customers to Faster Ethernet, Now—Despite many choices, switched Fast Ethernet is the bread-and-butter solution today,” VARBusiness No. 1120 (1995) p. 67 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Cohen, Jodi. “Nbase fires starting gun in race for gigabit Ethernet,” Network World (May 27, 1996) p. 1 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Valentino, George J. et al. “The incorporation of Fibre Channel and Scalable Coherent Interface technologies in avionics subsystems,” AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) 15th, Atlanta, GA (Oct. 27-31, 1996) Proceedings (1996) p. 365-372 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Diefendorff, Keith. “K7 Challenges Intel . . . ” Microprocessor Report vol. 12 No. 14 (Oct. 26, 1998) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Diefendorff, Keith. “Jalapeno Powers Cyrix's M3,” Microprocessor Report vol. 12 No. 15 (Nov. 16, 1998) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Barker, Ralph. “SGI's Origin 2000 server,” UNIX Review's Performance Computing vol. 16 No. 11 (Oct. 1998) p. 49(7) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Barker, Ralph. “Auspex Netserver 7000 Model 810: With much of the competition endorsing file serve-specific, microkernel Oss, can a SPARC and Solaris-based systems shine at the high end?” UNIX Review's Performance Computing vol. 16 No. 9 (Aug. 1998) p. 41(6) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Wong, William. “Using high-end multiprocessor servers,” Network VAR vol. 6 No. 1 (Jan. 1998) p. 42(5) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Lewis, Ric L. et al. “Delivering PCI in HP B-class and C-class workstations: a case study in the challenges of interfacing with industry standards,” Hewlett-Packard Journal vol. 49 No. 2 (May 1998) p. 51(11) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Bournellis, Cynthia. “Sun to put heat on storage market,” Electronic News vol. 44 No. 2204 (Feb. 2, 1998) p. 2(2) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Schweber, Linda Von et al. “SuperHIPPI turns on power,” PCWeek vol. 15 No. 4 (Jan. 26, 1998) p. 85(2) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Silicon Graphics Regards its S2MP Scalable Shared Memory Multiprocessor as Answer to Bus Bandwidth Limits,” Comptergram International No. 3024 (Oct. 21, 1996) p. CGN10210005 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Morgenstern, David. “No rest for FireWire,” MacWEEK vol. 10 No. 38 (Oct. 7, 1996) p. 4(2) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Despite having a full set of technologies, Sun settles for a simplified non-uniform memory architecture,” Computergram International No. 942 (Jun. 26, 1996) p. CGN06260009 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Kjos, Todd J. et al. “Hardware cache coherent input/output,” Hewlett-Packard Journal vol. 47 No. 1 (Feb. 1996) p. 52(8) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Sun users LSI logic CMOS chip set in S3.MP serial link to build high-speed interconnect for thousands of nodes,” Computergram International (Aug. 30, 1995) p. CGN08300010 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Tandem looks to servernet to be with McGuffin that keeps it ahead of the pack,” Computergram International (Jul. 20, 1995) p. CGN07200008 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Turley, James L. “Literature watch,” Microprocessor Report vol 8 No. 15 (Nov. 14, 1994) p. 26(1) (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Boyd-Merritt, Rick. “PCI follow-on targets servers, switches—Gigabit bus carries Intel to comm turf,” Electronic Engineering Times No. 997 (1998) p. 1 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Runyon, Stan. “ATE Industry reinventing itself for systems-on-a-chip,” Electronic Engineering Times No. 964 (1997) p. 18 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Dillon, Nancy. “IBM's Seascape not quite to shore,” Computerworld (Feb. 16, 1998) p. 57 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Murata, S. et al. “Wide-area distributed disaster-tolerant file system for multimedia data storage,” Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering Conference vol. 3312 (1997) p. 330-8 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Iwanchuk, Russ. “Lighten your load—The Net App F760 helps you off-load your file services and free your network storage,” PC Magazine vol. 18 No. 1 (Jan. 5, 1999) p. 77 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Sequent Ships Cluster File System, Fibre Channel Switch,” Computergram International No. 3308 (Dec. 9, 1997) p. CGN12090007 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Chowdhry, Pankaj. “The Ferrari of file transfers,” PC Week vol. 14 No. 49 (Nov. 24, 1997) p. 91 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Sun Ships First Phase of Full Moon Clustering and Presses Advantages of High Availability,” Computergram International No. 3259 (Oct, 2, 1997) p. CGN10020012 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Alexander, George et al. “Data communications aids,” Seybold Report on Publishing Systems vol 26 No. 1 (Aug. 4, 1997) p. 45 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Baker, Steven. “NFS and network performance on Unix,” UNIX Review vol. 15 No. 10 (Sep. 1997) p. 17 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Fawcett, Neil. “Rhubarb and clusters,” Computer Weekly (May 22, 1997) p. 48 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Grein, Randy. “Where RAID excels,” Network VAR vol. 5 No. 2 (Feb. 1997) p. 40 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Parker, Tim. “HP raises the Ante,” HP Professional vol. 11 No. 12 (Feb. 1997) p. 22 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Fibre Channel: Brocade and Prisa Networks announce customer agreement to deliver the SilkWorm switching for production, post-production and broadcast facilities,” EDGE: Work-Group Computing Report vol. 8 (Apr. 14, 1997) p. 22 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Moscow Focus: Tricord Systems, Inc.,” Computergram International No. 3135 (Apr. 8, 1997) p. 13 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- De Nike, Kristina et al. “The future of storage,” MacUser vol. 13 No. 5 (May 1997) p. 62 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Storage: ImpactData introduces new storage architecture for high performance computing,” EDGE: Work-Group Computing Report vol. 7 (Nov. 18, 1996) p. 26 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Lomb, Reiner et al. “Storage management solutions for distributed computing environments,” Hewlett-Packard Journal vol. 47 No. 5 (Oct. 1996) p. 81 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Poultney, John. “Pluto to spin Ultra SCSI-3 Space array,” MacWEEK vol. 10 No. 46 (Dec. 2, 1996) p. 8 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Katz, Bill. “Application servers: the power of four,” PC Magazine vol. 15 No. 18 (Oct. 22, 1996) p. 197 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Network Management,” LAN Magazine vol. 11 No. 10 (Sep. 15, 1996) p. 201 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Dipirro, Steve. “OpenVMS: the next generation,” Digital Age vol. 15 No. 9 (Sep. 1996) p. 16 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Literature watch,” Microprocessor Report vol. 10, No. 6 (May 6, 1996) p. 24 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Storage: new subsystem paradigm looms on the horizon,” EDGE: Work-Group Computing Report vol. 7 No. 307 (Apr. 1, 1996) p. 2 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Network management,” LAN Magazine vol. 10 No. 10 (Oct. 15, 1995) p. 201 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “HP to show SMP servers with PA-8000 migration,” Electronic News vol. 41 No. 2058 (Mar. 27, 1995) p. 20 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Unix multiprocessing: HP 9000 K-class server for commercial & technical environments; powerful, highly expansive symmetric multiprocessing platform design offers unprecedented midrange performance,” EDGE, on & about AT&T vol. 10 N. 349 (Apr. 3, 1995) p. 50 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Fellows, William. “IBM RS/6000 announcements: AIX nhancements, DB2/6000 2.0 in beta,” Computergram International (Jun. 16, 1994) p. 14 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Gengler, Barbara. “Sun strategy emphasizes storage,” LAN Computer vol. 5No. 4 (Apr. 1994) p. 7 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “1993 at a glance,” LAN Magazine vol. 8 No. 13 (Dec. 1993) p. 205 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “IBM RISC announcements: the collaborative PowerParallel box . . . ” Computergram International (Mar. 12, 1993) p. 12 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Stratton, Lynn. “IBM mobilises its RS/6000 RISC to power its entry into parallel supercomputer market,” Computergram International (Feb. 23, 1993) p. 7 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Chips: Protocol Engines chooses HP VLSI foundry; fabrication of Protocol Engine chipset begins,” EDGE Work-Group Computing Report vol. 3 No. 90 (Feb. 10, 1992) p. 31 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Garvey, Martin J. “The Network is the Storage—Faster, cheaper, easier than conventional Unix servers, dedicated ‘filers’ are catching on with demanding users,” Informationweek No. 661 (1997) p. 131 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Moozakis, Chuck. “Xelus Plans New Storage Architecture,” Internetweek No. 694 (1997) p. 37 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Harbaugh, Logan. “NT 5.0 Shows Promise—Beta 1 provides a look at features in the upcoming operating system, including Active Directory service and support for new hardware standards,” Informationweek No. 659 (1997) p. 69 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Methodology,” Computer Reseller News No. 762 (1997) p. 248 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Rash, W. et al. “NT 5.0 Beta Hits the Streets,” Internetweek no. 684 (1997) p. 20 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Gage, D. “Sun launches next step in Full Moon,” Computer Reseller News No. 757 (1997) p. 36 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Moozakis, C. “NT 5.0 to address key storage issues,” Internetweek No. 683 (1997) p. 9 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Yoshida, J. “DTV task force tackles networked multimedia—Global group weighs proposed technologies from five parties,” Electronic Engineering Times No. 965 (1997) p. 1 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Shared Storage,” VARBusiness No. 1311 (1997) p. 132 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Wirbel, Loring. “Communications Hardware—Switch/server links grab Gbit spotlight,” Electronic Engineering Times No. 941 (1997) p. 41 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Covell, Andy et al.“LIVE1 From your Network—The Big Picture: 3 Low-End Internet Video Servers; Plus 4 Sneak Peeks at LAN/Campus High-Bandwidth Video Servers,” Network Computing No. 716 (1996) p. 60 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Conover, Joel. “ATM, Fast Ethernet, Fibre Channel-Fast, Fast: 26 of the Hottest, Fastest Network Interface Cards Tests in our University of Wisconsin Labs,” Network Computing No. 164 (1995) p. 46 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Rizzo, Tony. “Going Fast, Faster and Fastest,” Network Computer No. 614 (1995) p. 14 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- “Client-Server Applications,” Open Systems Today No. 132 (1993) p. 68 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- DeVoney, Chris. “Product Review,” Computerworld (Oct. 6, 1997) p. 124 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Gittlen, Sandra. “Company ditches Digital Unix platform in favor of Sun's,” Network World (Jun. 30, 1997) p. 17 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Cohen, Judi. “Gigabit Ethernet Grabs Spotlight at Interop,” Network World (May 12, 1997) p. 27 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Heskett , Ben. “Storage vendors provide fast data access,” Network World (May 27, 1996) p. 27 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- Dombusch, Margaret. “Sentinel Systems makes its move into superserver market,” Network World (Nov. 21, 1994) p. 29 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant
- MacAskill, Skip. “Hollywood gives FDDI more than a bit part,” Network World (Jan. 10, 1994) p. 1 (Dialog Search Result printout).Applicant