US 7,269,275 B2Grant
Physical objects and validation of physical objects
Issue Date:2007-09-11
•20 Claims
•4 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
The present invention relates generally to validating and providing physical objects. In one implementation, a physical object includes a first digital watermark carried thereon. The first digital watermark includes a first plural-bit message representing at least a reduced-bit representation of a biometric corresponding to an authorized bearer of the physical object. The physical object further includes semantic information carried thereon. At least a portion of the semantic information corresponds to the authorized bearer of the physical object. In another implementation, an apparatus is provided to validate physical objects. In some cases the objects include identification documents.
Metadata
Assignee
- Digimarc Corporation
Inventors
- J. Scott Carr
- Burt W. Perry
- Geoffrey B. Rhoads
Application Information
Application Number:US 11/286,154
Filing Date:2005-11-23
Priority Date:1995-08-09
Art Unit:2624
Classifications
IPC:
H04K1/00
Patent Drawings (4 sheets)
Description
Related Applications
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/011,129 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,970,573), which are each hereby incorporated by reference. The Ser. No. 10/011,129 application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/422,780, filed Nov. 18, 1999 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,151), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/109,259, filed Nov. 19, 1998. The Ser. No. 09/442,780 application is also a continuation in part of U.S. patent application No. 09/074,034, filed May 6, 1998 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,449,377). The Ser. No. 10/011,129 application is also a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/198,022, filed Nov. 23, 1998 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,546,112), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/763,847, filed Dec. 4, 1996 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,886), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/512,993, filed Aug. 9, 1995 (now abandoned).
Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates to the security documents such as passports, driver's licenses, credit cards, etc. and to systems for producing and validating such documents.
Background of the Invention
[0003] Many security documents contain a picture of the owner of the document. For example, a driver's license generally includes a picture of the driver and a passport generally includes a picture of the owner of the passport. Validation of such documents is performed by comparing the actual physical appearance of the person possessing the document to the picture on the document. A common counterfeiting technique involves replacing the picture on a security document with a picture of someone who is not the owner of the document.
[0004] U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,886 which will issue Nov. 24, 1998 describes a technique whereby a digital watermark is included in the picture on a security document. The security document contains human readable text that is related to the data contained in the watermark. The document can be inserted into a scanner which will read the watermark and the operator can compare the output of watermark reader to the text to insure that the person possessing the document is the legitimate owner.
[0005] Custom printing systems are available which accept data from multiple sources and which produce documents which are tailored to individual customer characteristics or to information concerning an individual customer. Such systems can for example produce personalized documents that include both fixed information that is on each document that is printed and variable information such as personal information about an individual's account at an institution such as a bank. One such system is commercially marketed under the trademark “PageFlex” by Bitstream Inc. or Cambridge Mass.
[0006] Likewise the technology for producing images which contain steganographic information in the form of digital watermarks is well developed. For example see U.S. Pat. No. 5,636,292, U.S. Pat. No. 5,748,783 or the “Communications of the ACM” published July 1998 Vol. 41. No. 7 pages 31 to 77. Commercial products which can store and read digital watermarks are also widely available. Examples of such products include “Adobe PhotoShop” Versions 4.0 and 5.0 and “Adobe ImageReady” Version 1.0 which are marketed by Adobe Corporation, “CorelDRAW” Versions 7 and 8, and “Corel PHOTO-PAINT” Versions 7 and 8 which are marketed by Corel Corporation, and Micrografx Webtricity” Versions 1 and 2, “Micrografx Graphics Suite 2”, and “Micrografx Picture Publisher” Versions 7 and 8 which are marketed by Micrografx Corporation.
[0007] Security documents such as passports and drivers licenses have traditionally contained both images and printed text. However, the images and the text in such documents are generally prepared in separate processes and merely merged at a final step in the overall production.
[0008] The present invention is directed to an improved security document which has several correlated multi-level self validating features. The present invention is also directed to an improved overall method and system for producing security documents and to automatic authentication systems for such documents. With the present invention the document contains a number of different kinds of information that is hidden from normal view and which can be correlated to validate the document. The validation can be done entirely automatically decreasing the need for human intervention.
[0009] With the prior art systems, a human being such as an immigration officer must examine a passport to determine if the person presenting the document is the rightful owner of the document. With the present invention, the authentication can be done entirely automatically, leaving the human operator free to handle non-routine situations.
Summary of the Invention
[0010] The present invention provides security documents which has multiple fields or areas each of which contains information that is perceptible in more than one way. For example, one field can contain a visually perceptible image and a digital watermark that can be detected when the image is scanned and processed, another field can contain machine readable OCR text that can be read by both a human and by a programmed computer, and still another field can contain watermark data which can be correlated to the output of a fingerprint reader or apparatus which scans a user's iris.
[0011] Documents in accordance with the present invention are produced by a system and method which begins with a template which defines the placements of elements on the document and the interrelationships between hidden and visual information on the document. That is, the template specifies the placement of elements such as images, photographs, and text and it also specifies the interrelationship between information that is visually perceptible to a user of the document and information that is hidden (not perceptible to a user) by means of digital watermarks. Different hidden digital watermark data is included in multiple elements of the document. The watermarks in the different graphic elements of the document are correlated to each other and correlated to the visual material on the document. In this way the document can not be forged by replacing one element (such as a picture) with a similar element from another document. In order to produce a document defined by a particular template, appropriate pictures, graphics and digital data are extracted from a data bank, and watermark data is embedded in the pictures and graphics as appropriate. The merged digital data is then sent to a printing engine and the final document is produced.
[0012] An automatic validation system of the present invention reads multiple fields on the document, and it also automatically detects information about the user. The various information is correlated to validate the document.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0013] FIG. 1 illustrates a security document in accordance with the present invention.
[0014] FIG. 2 is an overall diagram of a preferred embodiment of a system to produce security documents in accordance with the present invention.
[0015] FIG. 3 is a diagram of a document validation system that operates in accordance with the present invention.
Description of a Preferred Embodiment
[0016] A diagram of a security document in accordance with the present invention is shown in FIG. 1 . The security features on the document are a pre-printed background 11 which 11 has an image or pattern (not visible in FIG. 1 ) which contains a digital watermark. The image in background 11 may contains lines the width of which are varied to carry a watermark in accordance with the technique described in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/074,034 filed May 6, 1998 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,449,377), the disclosure of which in incorporated herein in its entirety.
[0017] The document also contains a photograph 12 which shows the owner of the document. This photograph 12 contains a watermark such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,886 which will issue Nov. 24, 1998. The personalized background 14 can for example be a background image which corresponds to the image 12. While the personalized image 14 corresponds to the photograph 12, in area 14 the image is printed as a background image. Background images of various types are conventional, for example personal checks frequently have background images of animals, mountains, etc. The background text makes it hard to change the human readable text 15 which is printed over the background text. The bottom of the document has machine readable OCR-B text 16 and a Bar code 17.
[0018] It should be clearly understood that the document shown in FIG. 1 is merely illustrative of the various elements that can be combined to form a security document. The exact layout can vary depending upon the needs of the particular application. If desired for a particular application, the document can be much more complex than the document shown in FIG. 1 . The document can have many more fields and elements than does the document shown in FIG. 1 . Furthermore the document could contain the various other known technology for preventing counterfeiting such as special paper and special ink.
[0019] Document shown in FIG. 1 can for example be a document such as a driver's license in which case the picture 12 would be a picture of the owner of the license. Graphic image 11 could for example be a state seal. The text 15 could for example include the driver's license number, the owner's age, and the owner's address.
[0020] Document 10 can be a passport. In a passport, the hidden digital watermark data in picture 12 and in the other fields could be coordinated as follows:
[0021]
| Watermark contains | Correlates to | |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-printed | unique document | |
| background 11 | “batch” number | |
| Photo 12: | Batch number and passport | OCR-B version of passport |
| number | number, Human readable | |
| (cryptographically encoded) | passport number, Master | |
| document | ||
| Personalized | “hash” of fingerprint | fingerprint of the |
| background 14 | holder which is | |
| automatically read | ||
| Bar code 17 | Passport number | Watermark in photo 12 |
| (in code not in watermark) | ||
| OCR-B text 16 | Passport number | Info in photo 12, |
| Batch number | background 11 | |
| (in text not in watermark) | And Bar code 17 | |
[0022] An important point is that the various elements of hidden and visual information are coordinated in such a manner that the document is self authenticating. The hidden data in one field can be correlated with the hidden data in another field to insure that the document has not been altered.
[0023] If for example one tried to alter a document by replacing picture 12 with a different picture, the new picture would either contain no hidden data, or if it were a picture taken from a different document, the numbers stored in the picture would not match the printed information in text field 15.
[0024] If the picture from one document were substituted for the picture in a second document, the cryptographically encoded serial numbers could be used to determine the origin of the picture. It is noted that while in the example shown above, both the Batch number and passport number are cryptographically encoded, other numbers such as a serial number or an ID number could also be encoded in a special manner.
[0025] FIG. 2 shows an overall diagram of a system for producing document 10. The system includes a number of units, the operation of which is controlled and coordinated by a control computer 20. The following explanation will illustrate how the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 can be used to produce a document such as the document shown in FIG. 1 .
[0026] A template 21 is used to define the overall characteristics of a document. The characteristics specified by template 21, including the fields on the document, the data printed in any text fields and the watermarks included in each image included on the document.
[0027] The template 21 is used by document layout device 26 to layout a particular document for production. Data which is to be included in the watermarks in any image field are stored in Watermark data store 22. Any pictures, text data, and Graphics are stored in units 23, 24 and 25 respectively.
[0028] The document layout from unit 26, the digital watermark data from unit 22 and the pictures, text data and graphics from units 23, 24, and 25 are sent to Merging and watermarking unit 27. Unit 27 applies watermarks to pictures and graphics as specified by the layout information from unit 11. Application of the watermarks to the pictures and graphics can be done in a conventional manner; however, prior to sending the watermark payload (i.e. the data stored in the watermark) to the watermarking engine, the data can be passed through a conventional encryption program. Encrypting the payload data provides an added assurance that a counterfeiter could not make a counterfeit document. The level of encryption could be any level appropriate tot he value of the document.
[0029] The output from the Merging and watermarking unit 27 is then sent to a conventional printing engine 28 which produces a final document 10. Watermark Data storage 22, picture storage 23, digital data storage 24 and graphics storage 25 can be conventional data storage servers. Physically they could all be provided by one physical storage unit. Template input unit 21 is a conventional interactive terminal or personal computer with a graphic design program. Merging and watermarking unit 27 can be a conventional watermarking engine.
[0030] The system shown in FIG. 2 produces various parts of the security document in a single step, thereby making it much harder to replace one element on a security document with a similar element from another document.
[0031] FIG. 3 is a diagram of a document self authentication unit in accordance with the present invention. The system has three input units, each of which is conventional and commercially available. The input units are a magnetic stripe reader 301, a high resolution image scanner 302, and a fingerprint reader 303. The document 10, shown in FIG. 1 does not include a magnetic stripe, but one of the alternatives for such a document is to include a magnetic stripe.
[0032] The output from scanner 302 goes to three units (that is, to three computer programs) 305, 307 and 311. Alternatively, the bar code reader 305 could be a separate unit which directly reads the bar code and provides information to comparison and authentication unit 312.
[0033] If the bar code reader 305 is a computer program which receives information from the output of scanner 302, the program 305 will read the bar code 17. OCR program 307 reads the text 15 and the text 16 and watermark detector 311 reads the watermarks in images 11, 12 and 14.
[0034] An authentication and comparison unit 312 compares the data from units 301, 303, 305, 307 and 311 to determine if the data matches. If the data in some of the watermarks is encrypted, the comparison and authentication unit 312 would include an appropriate decryption program. The decryption program in unit 312 could obtain the decryption key from remote data base 314 in response to the number read by one of the devices. Alternatively, the encrypted data could be automatically sent to a central facility for decryption. The unit 312 can also access a remote data base 314 to determine if there is any special handling that is required for the document that has been presented. For example data base 314 could contain information about passports that have been cancelled for various reasons. The resulting information is displayed on a display unit 320.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A physical object comprising:
a first hidden digital watermark carried thereon, the first hidden digital watermark comprising a first plural-bit message representing at least a reduced-bit representation of a biometric corresponding to an authorized bearer of the physical object; and
semantic information carried thereon, wherein at least a portion of the semantic information corresponds to the authorized bearer of the physical object.
2. The object of claim 1 wherein the biometric represents a fingerprint.
3. The object of claim 1 wherein the biometric represents an iris.
4. The object of claim 1 further comprising a photographic representation of the authorized bearer of the object.
5. The object of claim 1 further comprising a second, different hidden digital watermark thereon, wherein the second, different hidden digital watermark comprises a second plural-bit message that corresponds to or is redundant with at least one of the semantic information and the first plural-bit message.
6. The object of claim 1 wherein the object comprises at least one of a photo identification document, a passport, a driver's license and a credit card.
7. The object of claim 1 wherein first hidden digital watermark is machine-readable via visible light scanning.
8. The object of claim 1 wherein the first hidden digital watermark is represented through alterations of data representing graphics or images.
9. The object of claim 1 wherein the first plural-bit message is encrypted.
10. The object of claim 1 wherein the reduced-bit representation of a biometric comprises a hash.
11. An apparatus to authentic a physical object, the physical object comprising a first hidden digital watermark including a first plural-bit message representing at least a first reduced-bit representation of a biometric, and semantic information carried thereon, said apparatus comprising:
a digital watermark reader to read the first hidden digital watermark to obtain the first reduced-bit representation of the biometric from the message;
a comparator to compare data representing a sampled biometric with the first reduced-bit representation; and
an output to display information corresponding to a comparison of the comparator.
12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein said comparator generates a reduced-bit representation of the sampled biometric, and compares the generated, reduced-bit representation of the sampled biometric to the first reduced-bit representation.
13. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the biometric represents a fingerprint.
14. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the biometric represents an iris.
15. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the physical object further comprises a photographic representation of an authorized bearer of the object.
16. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the physical object further comprises a second, different hidden digital watermark thereon, and wherein the second, different hidden digital watermark comprises a second plural-bit message that corresponds to or is redundant with at least one of the semantic information or the first plural-bit message.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein said digital watermark reader reads the second hidden digital watermark to obtain the second plural-bit message.
18. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the physical object comprises at least one of a passport, a driver's license and a credit card.
19. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein first hidden digital watermark is machine-readable from data generated by visible, light scanning.
20. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the first hidden digital watermark is represented through alterations to data representing graphics or images on the physical object.
Patent Citations (91)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4590366(A) | 1986-05-01 | Rothfjell | Applicant |
| US4675746(A) | 1987-06-01 | Tetrick et al. | Applicant |
| US4689477(A) | 1987-08-01 | Goldman | Applicant |
| US4790566(A) | 1988-12-01 | Boissier et al. | Applicant |
| US4972476(A) | 1990-11-01 | Nathans | Applicant |
| US4993068(A) | 1991-02-01 | Piosenka et al. | Examiner |
| US4995086(A) | 1991-02-01 | Lilley et al. | Examiner |
| US5144680(A) | 1992-09-01 | Kobayashi et al. | Examiner |
| US5237164(A) | 1993-08-01 | Takada | Applicant |
| US5284364(A) | 1994-02-01 | Jain | Applicant |
| US5319453(A) | 1994-06-01 | Copriviza et al. | Applicant |
| US5337361(A) | 1994-08-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US5351302(A) | 1994-09-01 | Leighton et al. | Applicant |
| US5379345(A) | 1995-01-01 | Greenberg | Applicant |
| US5384846(A) | 1995-01-01 | Berson et al. | Applicant |
| US5436970(A) | 1995-07-01 | Ray et al. | Applicant |
| US5469506(A) | 1995-11-01 | Berson et al. | Applicant |
| US5471533(A) | 1995-11-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US5490217(A) | 1996-02-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US5499294(A) | 1996-03-01 | Friedman | Applicant |
| US5509083(A) | 1996-04-01 | Abtahi et al. | Examiner |
| US5513272(A) | 1996-04-01 | Bogosian, Jr. | Examiner |
| US5598474(A) | 1997-01-01 | Johnson | Examiner |
| US5636292(A) | 1997-06-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US5646997(A) | 1997-07-01 | Barton | Applicant |
| US5652626(A) | 1997-07-01 | Kawakami et al. | Applicant |
| US5659726(A) | 1997-08-01 | Sandford, II et al. | Applicant |
| US5664018(A) | 1997-09-01 | Leighton | Applicant |
| US5694471(A) | 1997-12-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US5719948(A) | 1998-02-01 | Liang | Applicant |
| US5721788(A) | 1998-02-01 | Powell et al. | Applicant |
| US5740244(A) | 1998-04-01 | Indeck et al. | Applicant |
| US5748783(A) | 1998-05-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US5760386(A) | 1998-06-01 | Ward | Applicant |
| US5768426(A) | 1998-06-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US5787186(A) | 1998-07-01 | Schroeder | Applicant |
| US5799092(A) | 1998-08-01 | Kristol et al. | Applicant |
| US5815252(A) | 1998-09-01 | Price-Francis | Examiner |
| US5822432(A) | 1998-10-01 | Moskowitz et al. | Applicant |
| US5825892(A) | 1998-10-01 | Braudaway et al. | Applicant |
| US5838814(A) | 1998-11-01 | Moore | Applicant |
| US5841886(A) | 1998-11-01 | Rhoads | Examiner |
| US5862218(A) | 1999-01-01 | Steinberg | Applicant |
| US5864622(A) | 1999-01-01 | Marcus | Applicant |
| US5864623(A) | 1999-01-01 | Messina et al. | Applicant |
| US5890742(A) | 1999-04-01 | Waller | Applicant |
| US5907149(A) | 1999-05-01 | Marckini | Applicant |
| US5912974(A) | 1999-06-01 | Holloway et al. | Applicant |
| US5949885(A) | 1999-09-01 | Leighton | Applicant |
| US5951055(A) | 1999-09-01 | Mowry, Jr. | Applicant |
| US5995625(A) | 1999-11-01 | Sudia et al. | Applicant |
| US6024287(A) | 2000-02-01 | Takai et al. | Examiner |
| US6040783(A) | 2000-03-01 | Houvener et al. | Applicant |
| US6064764(A) | 2000-05-01 | Bhaskaran et al. | Applicant |
| US6086707(A) | 2000-07-01 | Waller | Applicant |
| US6104812(A) | 2000-08-01 | Koltai et al. | Applicant |
| US6122403(A) | 2000-09-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6148091(A) | 2000-11-01 | DiMaria | Examiner |
| US6154571(A) | 2000-11-01 | Cox et al. | Applicant |
| US6185312(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Nakamura et al. | Applicant |
| US6185316(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Buffam | Applicant |
| US6208746(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Musgrave | Examiner |
| US6229924(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Rhoads et al. | Applicant |
| US6243480(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Zhao et al. | Applicant |
| US6289108(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6292092(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Chow et al. | Examiner |
| US6321981(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Ray et al. | Applicant |
| US6343138(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6369904(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Bhattacharjya et al. | Applicant |
| US6389151(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Carr et al. | Examiner |
| US6411392(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Bender et al. | Applicant |
| US6449377(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Rhoads | Examiner |
| US6463416(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Messina | Applicant |
| US6496933(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Nunally | Applicant |
| US6546112(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Rhoads | Examiner |
| US6751336(B2) | 2004-06-01 | Zhao | Applicant |
| US6970573(B2) | 2005-11-01 | Carr et al. | Examiner |
| US7043052(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US2001/0007975(A1) | 2001-07-01 | Nyberg, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| DE2943436(A1) | 1981-05-01 | Examiner | |
| EP629972(A2) | 1994-12-01 | Applicant | |
| EP650146(A1) | 1995-04-01 | Applicant | |
| EP730242(A2) | 1996-09-01 | Applicant | |
| EP642060(B1) | 1999-04-01 | Applicant | |
| JP3-185585(A) | 1991-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO95/13597(A2) | 1995-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO96/03286(A1) | 1996-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO96/26494(A1) | 1996-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO96/36163(A2) | 1996-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO98/43152(A1) | 1998-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO99/36876(A2) | 1999-07-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (17)
- Bleumer, “Biometric yet Privacy Protecting Person Authentication,” Proc. 2nd Int. Information Hiding Workshop, LNCS vol. 1525, Apr. 1998, pp. 99-110.Examiner
- Szepanski, “A Signal Theoretic Method for Creating Forgery-Proof Documents for Automatic Verification,” Proc. Carnahan Conf. on Crime Countermeasures, May 1979, pp. 101-109.Examiner
- U.S. Appl. No. 60/109,259, filed Nov. 19, 1998, Carr et al.Applicant
- U.S. Appl. No. 08/512,993, filed Aug. 9, 1995, Rhoads.Applicant
- Office Action (Oct. 4, 2004) and Amendment (Jun. 14, 2004) from U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,899.Applicant
- Anand, D. amd Niranjan V.C. “Watermarking Medical Images with Patient Information” IEEE, Oct. 29, 1998.Applicant
- Bleumer, “Biometric yet Privacy Protecting Person Authentication,” IEEE Proc. 2.sup.nd Information Hiding Workshop, LNCS vol. 1525, Apr. 1998, pp. 99-110.Applicant
- Chow et al. “Forgery and Tamper-Proof Identification Document” IEEE Proc. 1993 Int. Carnahan Conf. on Security Technology Oct. 13-15, 1993, pp. 11-14.Applicant
- Gruhl et al., “Information Hiding to Foil the Casual Counterfeiter,” Proc. 2.sup.nd Information Hiding Worskshop, LNCS vol. 1525, Apr. 1998, pp. 1-15.Applicant
- Kawaguchi et al. “Principle and Applications of BPCS-Steganography” Proc. SPIE vol. 3528: Multimedia Systems and Applications Nov. 2-4, 1998 pp. 464-473.Applicant
- Komatsu et al. “A Proposal on Digital Watermarking in Document Image Communication and Its Application to Realizing a Signature” Electronics and Communications in Japan Part I vol. 73 No. 5 1990 pp. 22-23.Applicant
- Komatsu et al. “Authentication System Using Concealed Image in Telematics” Memoirs of the School of Science & Engineering Waseda Univ. No. 52, 1988 pp. 45-60.Applicant
- Pankanti, S. et al. “Verifictaion Watermarks on Finger print Recognition and Retrieval” IS&T/SPIE Conference on Security and Watermarking on Multimmedia: Oct. 2000, pp. 66-78.Applicant
- Perry, B. et al : Digital Watermarks as a Security Feature for Identity Documents Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3973, Apr. 2000 pp. 80-87.Applicant
- Ratha, N. et al. “Secure Data hiding in Wavelet Compressed Fingerprint Images” ACM Multimedia 2000 Workshop Oct. 30, 2000 pp. 127-130.Applicant
- Seybold Report on Desktop Publishing “Holographic Signatures for Digital Images” Aug. 1995 1 page.Applicant
- Szepanski, “A Signal Theoretic Method for Creating Forgery-Proof Documents For Automatic Verification,”, 1979 Carnahan Conference on Crime Countermeasures, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, May 16-18, 1979.Applicant