US 7,236,769 B2Grant
Value-added electronic messaging services and transparent implementation thereof using intermediate server
Issue Date:2007-06-26
•73 Claims
•9 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
This disclosure provides for a unified, centralized, preprocessing electronic messaging solution that performs value-added tasks to electronic messages on behalf of the ISP or the end user, before these messages are delivered to the destination e-mail server. The service can detect and detain damaging or unwanted messages, such as spam, viruses or other junk e-mail messages, and route electronic messages from various sources covering a variety of topics to wired and wireless destinations, apart from the intended recipient e-mail address, in various formats. In some embodiments, the electronic messaging solution provides a stored user profile, associated with a user to whom an e-mail message is addressed, that has detection parameters for processing e-mail message data. In such embodiments, a processor is also provided for processing the e-mail message data to identify suspect e-mail messages according to the detection parameters in the user profile. A web page accessible by the user to set the detection parameters is also disclosed. Furthermore, various methods associated with various embodiments of the electronic messaging solution disclosed herein are also disclosed.
Metadata
Assignee
- Postini, Inc.
Inventors
- Gordon Raymond Irlam
- Brian Maggi
- Scott Petry
Application Information
Application Number:US 10/672,688
Filing Date:2003-09-26
Priority Date:2000-09-29
Art Unit:2617
Classifications
IPC:
H04L12/58H04L12/66
Patent Drawings (9 sheets)
Description
Cross-Reference to Related Application
[0001] This Application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/675,609, filed on Sep. 29, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,650,890 which is commonly assigned with the present application and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Technical Field
[0002] Disclosed embodiments herein relate generally to electronic messaging, and more particularly to value-added electronic messaging services and transparent implementation thereof using an intermediate server.
Background
[0003] The adoption of e-mail has occurred at an unprecedented pace. Of routine computer users, most now have or soon will have an e-mail address. Many have more than one e-mail address, e.g., one for work and another for home. E-mail offers unparalleled convenience of written communication.
[0004] Besides ubiquitous e-mail, another powerful trend is wireless access via a variety of wireless devices, e.g., cell phones, pagers, hand-held computers such as Palm and Windows CE devices, etc. Service-specific e-mail gateways allow an e-mail message to be sent from the Internet to a particular wireless device. In the case of a Sprint PCS phone, for example, an e-mail may be addressed to #@sprintpcs.com, where # represents the telephone number of the phone. Despite this capability, wireless messaging is greatly complicated by the fact that a person may have multiple wireless devices, and that at a given time, the sender has no way of knowing the person's whereabouts or preferred method of message delivery at that time, let alone the address specifics pertaining to each gateway.
[0005] For example, the person may be in the office, in which case desktop e-mail would be preferred, on the road staying at a hotel, in which case cell phone e-mail might be preferred, or on the road away from a major metropolitan area, in which case pager e-mail (which has nationwide coverage in the US) might be preferred. This situation, referred to herein as the “multiple e-mail box conundrum,” is illustrated in FIG. 1 . An intended recipient B of an electronic message may receive electronic messages through one or more wired devices and/or one or more wireless devices, which may include some or all of the following: an ISP mail account, a free web mail account, a PDA mail account, a cell phone subscription, and a pager subscription. In each instance, e-mail is delivered through a different server or gateway connected to the Internet, i.e., a ISP mail server, a portal mail server, a PDA mail server, a cellular gateway and a paging gateway. A message originator A may, at various times, use some or all the devices mentioned to send an electronic message. In the multiple e-mail box conundrum, the message originator needs to know which e-mail address to use to reach the user. In turn, the recipient must monitor all accounts and devices to keep track of critical information. Furthermore, in the case of a wireless network gateway, the wireless gateway will typically strip off any e-mail attachments, usually without any notification to the user.
[0006] Note that, in FIG. 1 , wired devices may be stand-alone or LAN-based. In the case of stand-alone devices, connection to the Internet is typically dial-up access through an ISP. In the case of a LAN-based device, a server on the LAN may be connected to the Internet through an ISP or directly to the Internet without the involvement of an ISP.
[0007] Neither ISPs nor wireless providers are well-positioned to offer a complete solution to the electronic messaging problem. ISPs are primarily focused on new customer acquisition and often do not have enough users to attract wireless partners. In the case of wireless providers, users are generally unwilling to switch their primary e-mail address. And wireless vendors are generally unable to integrate with existing e-mail services.
[0008] With the widespread adoption of e-mail, there has also occurred the proliferation of junk e-mail, or “spam.” Currently, of the hundreds of millions of e-mail messages sent each day, about 30% of those messages may be expected to be junk e-mail. FIG. 2 illustrates “spamming” of the user of FIG. 1 . Various companies (e.g., Brightmail Inc. of San Francisco, Calif.) have addressed the problem of junk e-mail by providing e-mail filtering software that attempts to identify and discard junk e-mail. Typically, such software resides on a destination e-mail server. Such a solution does not scale well; i.e., installing and maintaining e-mail filtering software on e-mail servers grows increasingly difficult as the number of e-mail servers multiplies.
[0009] Because of the resources required to install and maintain an e-mail server, various companies have emerged offering e-mail outsourcing in which the e-mail server is provided by a third party outside the organization. E-mail outsourcing off-loads the responsibility for providing and maintaining e-mail service without necessitating any change in domain or e-mail addresses. E-mail is retrieved from an off-site e-mail server provided and maintained by the e-mail outsourcing company. One example of an e-mail outsourcing company is United Messaging Inc. of Malvern, Pa. Despite such arrangements, the multiple e-mail box conundrum and the junk e-mail problems remain.
[0010] Accordingly, a need exists for a scalable, transparent solution to the junk e-mail problem. Also, a need exists for a unified messaging solution, embracing wireless messaging, that addresses the foregoing drawbacks of the prior art.
Brief Summary
[0011] This disclosure, generally speaking, provides for a unified electronic messaging solution in which individual, configurable user profiles are used to route and deliver electronic messages from various sources, wired and/or wireless, to various destinations, wired and/or wireless, in various formats. Furthermore, various methods associated with various embodiments of the electronic messaging solution disclosed herein are also disclosed.
[0012] In an exemplary embodiment, the subject line of an electronic message may be sent to a user's pager, while an abbreviated version of the message is sent to the user's PDA having wireless-connectivity and the full electronic message is sent to the user's work. The unified electronic messaging solution may be deployed by ISPs within the existing Internet infrastructure. More preferably, scalability is greatly enhanced by providing (e.g., as part of a Network Operations Center, or NOC), an intermediate server that precedes a destination server on an electronic message delivery path.
[0013] The electronic messaging solution allows provides for performance of a variety of value-added services, such as junk e-mail filtering, recipient-directed message routing, including wireless delivery to any of a variety of wireless devices, rich media services such as attachment preview, etc. In the latter embodiment, the operator of the intermediate server therefore functions as an Electronic Messaging Service Provider (EMSP). Preferably, the intermediate server is inserted into the electronic message delivery path by changing a DNS (Domain Name Server) entry pertaining to the destination e-mail server. As a result, no new hardware or software is required for users or ISPs. Because a single NOC including the intermediate server can serve far-flung geographic regions, scalability is achieved.
[0014] The ease of inserting the intermediate server into the electronic message delivery path enables self-enrollment by ISPs (Internet Service Providers) in a cooperative services program (that may involve revenue sharing), enabling effective penetration to second-tier ISPs, which are extremely numerous. In one embodiment, junk e-mail, instead of being deleted without notification, is posted to a user-accessible web site where it is kept for a period of time. A user therefore has an opportunity to verify that the diverted messages are indeed junk e-mail. Through the web site, a user may create a profile governing the forwarding of messages. Preferably, the web site is accessible both from the desktop and from the wireless devices themselves, enabling real-time update of the profile by the user or by agent software.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0015] The present invention may be further understood from the following description in conjunction with the appended drawings. It is emphasized that various features may not be drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions of various features may be arbitrarily increased or reduced for clarity of discussion. In addition, it is emphasized that some components may not be illustrated for clarity of discussion. In the drawings:
[0016] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating the multiple e-mail box conundrum;
[0017] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating “spamming” of the user of FIG. 1 ;
[0018] FIG. 3 is a diagram of one embodiment of a unified message delivery system;
[0019] FIG. 4 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the intermediate server(s) of FIG. 3 ;
[0020] FIG. 5A is a more detailed block diagram of one embodiment of the server of FIG. 4 ;
[0021] FIG. 5B is an alternate diagram of one embodiment of the server of FIG. 4 ;
[0022] FIG. 6 is a diagram of an exemplary embodiment showing a configuration screen display that may be used to configure the unified message delivery system; and
[0023] FIG. 7 is a diagram emphasizing end user configuration and mail processing.
Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments
[0024] Referring now to FIG. 3 , a diagram is shown of one embodiment of a unified message delivery system. The system provides for a service that allows the user to define where messages are routed across multiple devices, which portions of messages are routed to which devices, etc. The system allows for ready integration with an enduser's primary e-mail service and is end-user configurable.
[0025] As compared to FIG. 1 , in which the electronic message delivery path proceeds through the Internet directly to one of a multiplicity of servers or gateways, in the system of FIG. 3 , an intermediate pre-processing service 301 is inserted into the message delivery path. The intermediate pre-processing service 301 preferably comprises an NOC including an array of mail handling machines, a database, a file store, web servers and utility machines. The intermediate pre-processing service 301 is in turn connected to the various servers and gateways of FIG. 1 , including, for example, a user's primary ISP 303, if any. Such connection typically also occurs through the Internet (305). The collection of servers and gateways 307 provide e-mail access for a variety of wired and wireless client devices 309, which may include, for example, a main e-mail system (typically a home or office desktop computer), a free web-based mail system (e.g., Yahoo or the like), a PDA (e.g., Palm VII), a cell phone and a pager. A typical user will use two or more of the foregoing electronic message delivery options and some users will use most or all of these options.
[0026] By established user-defined preferences, the user is able to control the flow of messages to the various devices. Preferences are configured using web browser software to create or modify a user profile. User profiles are stored in a relational database (not shown) accessible to the intermediate pre-processing service. Note that end-user configuration may occur via any web-enabled device, either wired or wireless. Wireless web access may be supported using technologies presently-known in the art such as Palm's “web clipping” technologies, the UPLink server suite of Phone.com of Redwood City, Calif., Wireless Application Protocol (WAP)-enabled cellphones, etc.
[0027] To take a concrete example, there may be three e-mail messages delivered to the intermediate pre-processing service 301 for a particular user, an urgent message, a message from the user's boss, and a message from the user's friend. In this example, the e-mail from the user's friend might be delivered to the user's main e-mail system and to the user's free web mail system The e-mail from the user's boss might be delivered to the user's PDA. The urgent message might be delivered to the user's cell phone and to the user's pager.
[0028] FIG. 3 illustrates the different manner of operation of the message delivery system of FIG. 3 , including the intermediate pre-processing service 301, as compared to the conventional electronic message delivery path of FIG. 1 . Say, for example, that user A, (e.g., [email protected]) wishes to send a e-mail to user B (e.g., [email protected]). Sue uses an e-mail program to create, address and send the e-mail. The mail is sent from Sue's computer to the local mail server for Sue's computer, which may reside on Sue's local area network or at an ISP. The local mail server queries a Domain Name Server (DNS) 311 to obtain the IP address for [email protected]. Normally, the local mail server uses the IP address returned by DNS to send the e-mail to the destination e-mail server for Tom's computer, (e.g., mail.aol.com). The e-mail is then delivered to Tom's computer.
[0029] In one embodiment of the present system, the normal electronic message delivery path is broken and the intermediate pre-processing service 301 is inserted into the electronic message delivery path. This result is easily accomplished by modifying the appropriate DNS record (such as the MX—mail exchange—record, for example) to point to the intermediate pre-processing service 301 instead of the destination e-mail server (e.g., 303). In this manner, the electronic message delivery path is modified such that the intermediate pre-processing service 301 handles all of the electronic messages that would otherwise have been handled by the destination e-mail server.
[0030] Given the ease with which the intermediate pre-processing service may be inserted into the message delivery path, the enrollment of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) in cooperative messaging service agreements with the operator of the intermediate pre-processing service (Electronic Messaging Service Provider, or EMSP) may be automated to a great extent. For example, the ISP may visit the web site of EMSP, indicate assent to terms and conditions, and specify billing information and a service start date.
[0031] Prior to the service start date, the ISP advises subscribers and arranges for its DNS entries to be modified appropriately as of the service start date.
[0032] Prior to the start date, users are advised by e-mail of additional available message center services. Each user is assigned a user name and password in order to access a message center web site. When the user first visits the message center web site, the user creates a profile that will be used thereafter to select and configure value-added service (e.g., junk e-mail filtering and virus checking) and to control message delivery. Within the profile, the user may designated a particular e-mail server as the user's main e-mail system. Profiles place users in control of their mail experience. Alternatively, A service provider can create a default profile of services and the user can visit the message center web site to modify the default configuration.
[0033] When the intermediate pre-processing service 301 receives an e-mail, it look ups the addressee's user profile. The intermediate pre-processing service then performs value-added processing of the message. For example, the intermediate pre-processing service may apply user-selected junk e-mail filters and user-selected virus checkers for checking attachments. Junk-e-mail blocking may be based on both content and IP routing information. “Clean” e-mail is delivered to the user's mail server as normal. Suspect messages, instead of being deleted without notification to the user, is held in a quarantine area, and the user is notified. The user can then, if desired, download messages flagged as suspect by accessing the message center web site.
[0034] Alternatively or in addition, the intermediate pre-processing service may deliver to the message to one or more wireless devices in accordance with the user profile, e.g., by forwarding the message to one or more servers or gateways 307 the addresses of which have been specified by the user in the user's profile. Prior to forwarding the message to a server or gateway, the intermediate pre-processing service 301 may perform any necessary reformatting to meet the requirements of a particular recipient device.
[0035] In general, a user may configure an arbitrary number of communication “channels,” each channel including a destination and, optionally, one or more message modification procedures including filters, reformatters, etc. that may affect message presentation, be required for message transport, etc.
[0036] The intermediate pre-processing service 301 may perform myriad other types of services. One example of such services involves certain attachments, e.g., rich media items such as MP3, JPEG, MPEG, etc. Such items are notorious “bandwidth hogs” and can easily clog up the message delivery system. Rather than simply delete such items, however, the intermediate pre-processing service 301 allows such items to be intelligently managed. One option is to treat rich media in like manner as junk e-mail. That is, rich media items, instead of being delivered with the e-mail messages to which they are attached, are delivered to the message center web site, and the user is notified. The user can then view/play or ignore the items as desired.
[0037] Another option is to produce replacement attachments, i.e., “thumbnail” versions of the rich media items. An option may be provided for the original full attachment(s) to be delivered to the user with a subsequent system-generated e-mail message. For example, a link may be embedded in the thumbnail along with appropriate text advising the user to click on the link to receive the full attachment. In one embodiment, clicking on the link takes the user to a complete, high resolution image residing in the user's personal message center.
[0038] Note that the functionality of the intermediate pre-processing service may be implemented at ISPs rather than at a central NOC without any sacrifice of functionality or any noticeable effect on the end user. In this instance, DNS information remains unchanged. In this scenario, however, ISPs must be persuaded to invest in additional hardware and/or software.
[0039] Referring to FIG. 4 , a generalized block diagram is shown of one embodiment of the intermediate pre-processing service 301 of FIG. 3 . One or more messaging servers 401, e.g., e-mail servers, are provided, realizing a receive and store function 403 and a forward function 405. The forward function incorporates various value-added services such as filtering, formatting, routing, multicasting, etc. Due to the multicasting feature of the forward block 405, a single incoming message may result in the forwarding of some greater number of outgoing messages.
[0040] The forward block 405 communicates with storage 407, which may include one or more relational databases or file servers. Storage 407 includes profile and local DNS information 409 for each subscriber, as well as a “quarantine” area 411 for storing filtered messages, e.g., messages determined to be unfit to forward. Subscribers are provided access to storage 407 through one or more web servers 413, allowing subscribers to configure their profiles, view filtered messages, etc.
[0041] Referring to FIG. 5A , a more detailed block diagram is shown of the intermediate pre-processing service 301 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention. Multiple hosts are defined on both the inbound mail server and the outbound mail server. Each host runs a copy of an appropriate mail program such as FreeBSD Qmail. In one alternate embodiment, a machine or a cluster of machines operates as a mail-receiving machine and a mail-delivering machine. This machine will accept a connection from a sending SMTP server and begin receiving data. Simultaneously, the machine will begin receiving the message data, querying the database for a specific user configuration, processing messages based on configuration, opening a connection to a receiving SMTP server, and delivering it. Standard mail server software is not required for this alternate embodiment.
[0042] Incoming mail is routed to an available host by a load balancer 505, or load-sharing switch/router, of a type commonly available from Cisco and other network equipment manufacturers. The server cluster 501 can include a server running a relational database management system such as Oracle, for example. The host queries the database to identify the user and user preferences. The host then processes the message as specified in the user profile. For spam checking, each host runs a copy of an appropriate spam filter. Virus checking can be done using a virus scanning application such as that available from Trend.
[0043] Good e-mails are addressed with one or more addresses in accordance with information specified in the user profile and sent to the outbound mail server cluster to be sent out. To deliver a message addressed to [email protected], our intermediate preprocessing lookup service looks up [email protected] and delivers This allows the ISP to update the final delivery location without requiring the intermediate preprocessing service to make any changes. The e-mail is sent to the ISP mail server 511 and possibly to other servers or gateways in accordance with the user profile.
[0044] Bad e-mails are saved “in quarantine” on a message center web site, and a notification e-mail is sent to the user. In the illustrated embodiment, the inbound mail server cluster is connected to a file store 521. The file store is in turn connected to a web server 523. When a user logs on to the web server, a web page is displayed that includes a link for displaying a summary of quarantined messages and/or attachments. By clicking on a selected item, the user is able to view the item and, depending on the attachment type, may be able to view the attachment. If the user so chooses, the user may be allowed to download an item suspected to contain a virus after the user has been given appropriate warning.
[0045] FIG. 5B shows an alternate diagram of a system of the present invention.
[0046] FIG. 6 shows an example of a web form screen display that may be filled out by the user to configure message delivery for that user and subsequently modified to modify the configuration. In the example shown, a subsequent screen display is shown after one of the mail filter items is selected.
[0047] In accordance with a further feature of the invention, devices may be provided with a background software routine that periodically notifies the messaging system, automatically, of the time of last user input to the device. This information may be used to dynamically route messages to increase the likelihood of early receipt by the user. For example, a user may specify messages to normally be delivered to the user's cellphone between the hours of 8-9AM, 12-1PM and 6-7PM, and to the user's work between the hours of 9-12AM and 1-6PM, in accordance with the user's normal routine. On a particular afternoon, however, the user may be away from the office and may have used his/or her cellphone to receive or make one or more calls, or to access information, etc. If the user has selected a “find me” configuration option, then this usage information may be used to intelligently route messages to the user's cellphone, for example.
[0048] The value-added electronic messaging system detailed in the foregoing description provides an elegant solution to the multiple e-mail box conundrum. User-centric in design, the system is end-user configurable and uses an intuitive web metaphor. Based on a scalable architecture, the system works with existing e-mail accounts and does not require hardware or software integration.
[0049] FIG. 7 is a diagram of one embodiment of the system of the present invention emphasizing end user configuration and mail processing.
[0050] It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential character thereof. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalents thereof are intended to be embraced therein.
[0051] Additionally, the section headings herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 CFR 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the invention(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically and by way of example, although the headings refer to a “Technical Field,” the claims should not be limited by the language chosen under this heading to describe the so-called technical field. Further, a description of a technology in the “Background” is not to be construed as an admission that technology is prior art to any invention(s) in this disclosure. Neither is the “Brief Summary” to be considered as a characterization of the invention(s) set forth in the claims found herein. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty claimed in this disclosure. Multiple inventions may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims associated with this disclosure, and the claims accordingly define the invention(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of the claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of the specification, but should not be constrained by the headings set forth herein.
Claims
Certificate of Correction present
The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.
What is claimed is:
1. An electronic message delivery system for use in an e-mail network comprising a sending e-mail server and a destination e-mail server, wherein e-mail messages comprising e-mail message data may be delivered from the sending e-mail server to the destination e-mail server via an electronic message delivery path, the system comprising:
(a) a stored user profile, associated with a user to whom an e-mail message is addressed, having detection parameters for processing e-mail message data;
(b) a processor for processing the e-mail message data and configured to identify suspect e-mail messages according to the detection parameters in the user profile; and
(c) a web page accessible to set the detection parameters.
2. A system according to claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to store but not deliver the suspect e-mail messages.
3. A system according to claim 2, wherein another web page is accessible by the user to inspect the suspect e-mail messages.
4. A system according to claim 3, where the web page to set the detection parameters is the same web page as the web page to inspect the suspect e-mail messages.
5. A system according to claim 1, wherein the processor is associated with an intermediate service that is inserted in the electronic message delivery path.
6. A system according to claim 5, where the processor is comprised within the intermediate service.
7. A system according to claim 5, wherein the intermediate service is inserted into the electronic message delivery path by changing a Domain Name System entry containing an IP address of the destination e-mail server to contain an IP address of the intermediate service.
8. A system according to claim 5, wherein a web page is accessible by an operator or agent of the destination e-mail server or a gateway to cause the intermediate service to be inserted into the electronic message delivery path.
9. A system according to claim 1, wherein the e-mail messages data comprises content data, source data, and destination data.
10. A method of providing electronic messaging service in an e-mail network comprising a sending e-mail server and a destination e-mail server, wherein e-mail messages comprising e-mail message data may be delivered from the sending e-mail server to the destination e-mail server via an electronic message delivery path, the method comprising:
(a) storing a user profile, associated with a user to whom an e-mail message is addressed, baying detection parameters;
(b) processing the e-mail message data to identify suspect e-mail messages according to the detection parameters in the user profile; and
(c) accessing a web page to establish the detection parameters.
11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the processing further comprises storing but not delivering the suspect e-mail messages.
12. A method according to claim 11, wherein the accessing further comprises accessing a web page by the user to inspect the suspect e-mail messages.
13. A method according to claim 12, wherein accessing a web page to inspect the suspect e-mail messages comprises accessing the web page used to set the detection parameters.
14. A method according to claim 10, further comprising receiving the e-mail message data in an intermediate service operable to perform the processing and positioned along the electronic message delivery path between the sending e-mail server and the destination e-mail server.
15. A method according to claim 14, wherein the processing is comprised within the intermediate service.
16. A method according to claim 14, further comprising receiving the e-mail message data with an intermediate service inserted into the electronic message delivery path by changing a Domain Name System entry containing an IP address of the destination e-mail server to contain an IP address of the intermediate service.
17. A method according to claim 14, further comprising accessing a web page by an operator or agent of the destination e-mail server or a gateway to insert the intermediate service into the electronic message delivery path.
18. A method according to claim 10, wherein the e-mail message data comprises content data, source data, and destination data.
19. A method of providing electronic messaging services in an e-mail network comprising a sending e-mail server and a destination e-mail server, wherein e-mails may be delivered from the sending e-mail server to the destination e-mail server via an electronic message delivery path, the method comprising:
(a) inserting an intermediate pre-processing service into the electronic message delivery path by changing a Domain Name System entry containing an IP address of the destination e-mail server to contain an IP address of the intermediate pre-processing service, the intermediate pre-processing service storing a user profile having detection parameters for processing e-mail message data, the user profile associated with a user to whom an e-mail message is addressed;
(b) receiving in the intermediate pre-processing service e-mail message data addressed to the destination e-mail server that has been routed to the intermediate pre-processing service, the user profile accessible through a web page by the user to set the detection parameters; and
(c) simultaneously with receiving the e-mail message data in the intermediate pre-processing service, processing the e-mail message data to identify suspect e-mail messages according to the detection parameters, and, if the processing instructs delivery to the destination e-mail server, delivering the e-mail message data to that server.
20. A method according to claim 19, further comprising identifying suspect e-mail messages and storing but not delivering the suspect e-mail messages.
21. A method according to claim 19, further comprising a user accessing a server to inspect suspect e-mail messages addressed to the user.
22. A method according to claim 19, wherein the stored user profile describes the preferences of a user who is an end user of the electronic messaging services.
23. A method according to claim 19, further comprising accessing a web page by an operator or agent of the destination e-mail server or a gateway to cause the intermediate pre-processing service to be inserted into the electronic message delivery path.
24. A method according to claim 19, wherein the processing includes delivering at least one e-mail message comprising the e-mail message data to one or more wireless network gateways.
25. A method according to claim 19, wherein the e-mail message data comprises content data, source data, and destination data.
26. A method according to claim 19, wherein the intermediate pre-processing service accepts a connection from a sending SMTP server, and simultaneously with the receiving of e-mail message data over that connection opens a connection to a receiving SMTP server.
27. A method according to claim 19, wherein the method is accomplished in the intermediate pre-processing service without providing standard mail server software in the intermediate pre-processing service.
28. A method according to claim 19, wherein processing the e-mail message data further comprises processing the e-mail message data with the intermediate pre-processing service.
29. An electronic message delivery system for use in an e-mail network comprising a sending e-mail server and a destination e-mail sewer, wherein e-mails may be delivered from the sending e-mail server to the destination e-mail server via an electronic message delivery path, the system comprising:
(a) an intermediate pre-processing service configured to be inserted into the electronic message delivery path by changing a Domain Name System entry containing an IP address of the destination e-mail server to contain an lip address of the intermediate pre-processing service;
(b) e-mail message data addressed to the destination e-mail server received by the intermediate pre-processing service, the intermediate pre-processing service having a stored user profile, associated with a user to whom an e-mail message is addressed, having detection parameters for processing the e-mail message data and being accessible through a web page by the user to set the parameters; and
(c) a processor associated with the intermediate pre-processing service for processing the e-mail message data simultaneously with the receiving of the e-mail message data by the intermediate pre-processing service to identify suspect e-mail messages according to the detection parameters in the user profile, the e-mail message data delivered to the destination e-mail server if the processing of the e-mail message data instructs delivery to that server.
30. A system according to claim 29, wherein the processor is located within the intermediate pre-processing service.
31. A system according to claim 29, wherein the processor is further configured to identify suspect e-mail messages and store but not deliver the suspect e-mail messages.
32. A system according to claim 31, further including a web page accessible by a user to inspect suspect e-mail messages addressed to the user.
33. A system according to claim 32, wherein the web page accessible to inspect suspect e-mails is the same as the web page accessible to set the detection parameters.
34. A system according to claim 29, wherein the stored user profile describes the preferences of a user who is an end user of the system.
35. A system according to claim 29, further comprising a web page accessible by an operator or agent of the destination e-mail server or a gateway to cause the intermediate pre-processing service to be inserted into the electronic message delivery path.
36. A system according to claim 29, wherein the processor is further configured to deliver at least one e-mail message comprising the e-mail message data to one or more wireless network gateways.
37. A system according to claim 29, wherein the e-mail message data comprises content data, source data, and destination data.
38. A system according to claim 29, wherein the intermediate pre-processing service is further configured to accept a connection from a sending SMTP server and, simultaneously with the receiving of e-mail message data over that connection, open a connection to a receiving SMTP server.
39. A system according to claim 29, wherein the processor is configured to process the e-mail message data without providing standard mail server software in the intermediate pre-processing service.
40. A system according to claim 1, wherein the web page is accessible by the user to set the detection parameters.
41. A system according to claim 5, wherein the intermediate service is operable to route e-mails received from the sending server to the destination server if not identified as suspect by the processor.
42. A system according to claims 5, wherein the intermediate service is an intermediate pre-processing service.
43. A system according to claim 5, wherein the processor is further configured to identify the suspect e-mail messages simultaneously with the receiving of the e-mail message data by the intermediate service.
44. A system according to claim 5, wherein the user profile is stored in the intermediate service.
45. A system according to claim 5, wherein the user profile is stored in a database associated with the intermediate service.
46. A method according to claim 10, wherein the accessing further comprises accessing the web page by the user to set the detection parameters.
47. A method according to claim 14, further comprising routing e-mails received with the intermediate service from the sending server to the destination server if not identified as suspect by the processing.
48. A method according to claims 14, wherein the intermediate service is an intermediate pre-processing service.
49. A method according to claim 14, wherein the processing further comprises processing the e-mail message data to identify the suspect e-mail messages simultaneously with the receiving of the e-mail message data by the intermediate service.
50. A method according to claim 14, wherein the method further comprises storing the user profile in the intermediate service.
51. A method according to claim 14, wherein the method further comprises storing the user profile in a database associated with the intermediate service.
52. An electronic message delivery system for use in an e-mail network comprising a sending e-mail server and a destination e-mail server, wherein e-mail messages comprising e-mail message data may be delivered from the sending e-mail server to the destination e-mail server via an electronic message delivery path, the system comprising:
(a) an intermediate service inserted into the electronic message delivery path and configured to receive the e-mail message data from the sending server;
(b) a user profile stored in the intermediate service and associated with a user to whom an e-mail message is addressed, the user profile having adjustable detection parameters for processing e-mail message data; and
(c) a processor associated with the intermediate service for processing the received e-mail message data and configured to identify suspect e-mail messages according to the detection parameters in the user profile.
53. A system according to claim 52, wherein the processor is further configured to store but not deliver the suspect e-mail messages.
54. A system according to claim 53, wherein a web page associated with the intermediate service is accessible by the user to inspect the suspect e-mail messages.
55. A system according to claim 54, wherein the web page is further accessible by the user to set the detection parameters.
56. A system according to claim 52, wherein the intermediate service is operable to forward e-mails received from the sending server to the destination server if not identified as suspect by the processor.
57. A system according to claim 52, wherein the processor is further configured to identify the suspect e-mail messages simultaneously with the receiving of the e-mail message data by the intermediate service.
58. A system according to claim 52, where the processor is comprised within the intermediate service.
59. A system according to claims 52, wherein the intermediate service is an intermediate preprocessing service.
60. A system according to claim 52, wherein the intermediate service is inserted into the electronic message delivery path by changing a Domain Name System entry containing an IP address of the destination e-mail server to contain an IP address of the intermediate service.
61. A system according to claim 60, wherein a web page is accessible by an operator or agent of the destination e-mail server or a gateway to cause the intermediate service to be inserted into the electronic message delivery path.
62. A system according to claim 52, wherein the e-mail message data comprises content data, source data, and destination data.
63. A method of providing electronic messaging service in an e-mail network comprising a sending e-mail server and a destination e-mail server, wherein e-mail messages comprising e-mail message data may be delivered from the sending e-mail server to the destination e-mail server via an electronic message delivery path, the method comprising:
(a) inserting an intermediate service into the electronic message delivery path, the intermediate service configured to receive the e-mail message data from the sending server;
(b) storing a user profile in the intermediate service, the user profile associated with a user to whom an e-mail message is addressed and having adjustable detection parameters for processing e-mail message data; and
(c) processing the e-mail message data received by the intermediate service by identifying suspect e-mail messages according to the detection parameters in the user profile.
64. A method according to claim 63, wherein the processing further comprises storing but not delivering the suspect e-mail messages.
65. A method according to claim 64, further comprising accessing a web page associated with the intermediate service by the user to inspect the suspect e-mail messages.
66. A method according to claim 65, further comprising accessing the web page by the user to set the detection parameters.
67. A method according to claim 63, further comprising forwarding e-mails received from the sending server to the destination server with the intermediate service if the e-mails are not identified as suspect by the processing.
68. A method according to claim 63, wherein the processing further comprises identifying the suspect e-mail messages simultaneously with the receiving of the e-mail message data by the intermediate service.
69. A method according to claim 63, where the processing is provided from within the intermediate service.
70. A method according to claims 63, wherein the intermediate service is an intermediate preprocessing service.
71. A method according to claim 63, wherein inserting comprises inserting the intermediate service into the electronic message delivery path by changing a Domain Name System entry containing an IP address of the destination e-mail server to contain an IP address of the intermediate service.
72. A method according to claim 71, further comprising accessing a web page by an operator or agent of the destination server or a gateway to insert the intermediate service into the electronic message delivery path.
73. A system according to claim 63, wherein the e-mail message data comprises content data, source data, and destination data.
Patent Citations (72)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4837798(A) | 1989-06-01 | Cohen et al. | Applicant |
| US5619648(A) | 1997-04-01 | Canale et al. | Applicant |
| US5627764(A) | 1997-05-01 | Schutzman et al. | Applicant |
| US5634005(A) | 1997-05-01 | Matsuo | Applicant |
| US5742668(A) | 1998-04-01 | Pepe et al. | Applicant |
| US5771355(A) | 1998-06-01 | Kuzma et al. | Applicant |
| US5796948(A) | 1998-08-01 | Cohen | Applicant |
| US5832208(A) | 1998-11-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US5844969(A) | 1998-12-01 | Goldman et al. | Applicant |
| US5889943(A) | 1999-03-01 | Ji et al. | Applicant |
| US5905777(A) | 1999-05-01 | Foladare et al. | Applicant |
| US5937161(A) | 1999-08-01 | Mulligan et al. | Applicant |
| US5937162(A) | 1999-08-01 | Funk et al. | Applicant |
| US5968117(A) | 1999-10-01 | Schuetze | Applicant |
| US5987611(A) | 1999-11-01 | Freund | Applicant |
| US5999932(A) | 1999-12-01 | Paul | Applicant |
| US6014429(A) | 2000-01-01 | LaPorta et al. | Applicant |
| US6023723(A) | 2000-02-01 | McCormack et al. | Applicant |
| US6052709(A) | 2000-04-01 | Paul | Applicant |
| US6061718(A) | 2000-05-01 | Nelson | Applicant |
| US6073165(A) | 2000-06-01 | Narasimhan et al. | Applicant |
| US6075863(A) | 2000-06-01 | Krishnan et al. | Applicant |
| US6092194(A) | 2000-07-01 | Touboul | Applicant |
| US6112227(A) | 2000-08-01 | Heiner et al. | Applicant |
| US6118856(A) | 2000-09-01 | Paarsmarkt et al. | Examiner |
| US6138146(A) | 2000-10-01 | Moon et al. | Examiner |
| US6146026(A) | 2000-11-01 | Ushiku | Applicant |
| US6147987(A) | 2000-11-01 | Chau et al. | Examiner |
| US6178331(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Homes et al. | Applicant |
| US6249805(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Fleming, III | Applicant |
| US6249807(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Shaw et al. | Applicant |
| US6263202(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Kato et al. | Applicant |
| US6301245(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Luzeski et al. | Applicant |
| US6317751(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Yeger et al. | Applicant |
| US6321267(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Donaldson | Applicant |
| US6334140(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Kawamata | Applicant |
| US6335966(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Toyoda | Applicant |
| US6389276(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Brilla et al. | Applicant |
| US6404762(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Luzeski et al. | Applicant |
| US6411684(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Cohn et al. | Applicant |
| US6434601(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Rollins | Applicant |
| US6438215(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Skladman et al. | Applicant |
| US6442589(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Takahashi et al. | Applicant |
| US6453327(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Nielsen | Applicant |
| US6487586(B2) | 2002-11-01 | Ogilvie et al. | Applicant |
| US6513045(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Casey et al. | Applicant |
| US6574658(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Gabber et al. | Applicant |
| US6609196(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Dickinson, III et al. | Applicant |
| US6615258(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Barry et al. | Applicant |
| US6650890(B1) | 2003-11-01 | Irlam et al. | Examiner |
| US6654787(B1) | 2003-11-01 | Aronson et al. | Applicant |
| US6691156(B1) | 2004-02-01 | Drummond et al. | Applicant |
| US6711618(B1) | 2004-03-01 | Danner et al. | Applicant |
| US6779021(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Bates et al. | Applicant |
| US6868498(B1) | 2005-03-01 | Katsikas | Applicant |
| US2001/0032095(A1) | 2001-10-01 | Balbach | Applicant |
| US2002/0059454(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Barrett et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0064850(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Irlam et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0266832(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Irlam et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0155808(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Irlam et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0178136(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Irlam et al. | Applicant |
| WO96/35994 | 1996-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO97/12321 | 1997-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO97/27546 | 1997-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO98/37680(A2) | 1998-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO99/06929 | 1999-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO99/65256 | 1999-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO99/67731 | 1999-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/42747 | 2000-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/49776(A1) | 2000-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/46867 | 2001-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2/08938 | 2002-01-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (34)
- CVS.SOURCEFORGE.NET, “Spam Filtering ESMTP Demon”, copyright notice dated 2000, publ. at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/clocc/clocc/src/donc/smt-p.lisp?rev=1.4.Applicant
- Bounce Spam Mail, from Albert Yale Software, dated 1997-2000.Applicant
- CSM Internet Mail Scanner, from CSM-USA, Inc., dated 1999.Applicant
- CyberSitter AntiSpam, from CyberSitter.com, distributed by Solid Oak Software, circa 1999-2000.Applicant
- DL MailFilter, from DeadLetter and Leem Han Cheong, dated Nov. 1999.Applicant
- E-Mail Chomper, from Lorenzo Pasqualis, dated 1996-97.Applicant
- E-Mail Remover, from Victor Javier, Virtual Network, Inc., Singapore, dated Mar.-Jul. 1998, and 1999.Applicant
- FlameThrower, from Eagle Research, Inc., dated 2000.Applicant
- Interceptor, from Grok Development Ltd., dated 1999-2000.Applicant
- JOC E-Mail Checker, from JOCSoft and Jose Olice Civit, dated 2000.Applicant
- Lyris MailShield, from Lyris, undated.Applicant
- Quickhead-E, from Danere Software Innovations, dated Mar. 2000.Applicant
- Spam Attack Pro, circa 1996-97, from softwiz.com.Applicant
- Spam Buster, from Contact Plus Corp., dated 2000.Applicant
- SpamEater, from High Mountain Software, dated 1997-2000.Applicant
- BrightMail, from BrightMail, Inc., dated 1997-2000.Applicant
- Praetor, from Computer Mail Services, Inc., circa 1998-99.Applicant
- “MsgTo.com Stops Spam Email”, web page circa Nov. 19, 1999, from www.applesforhealth.com.Applicant
- “The Species Filter”, by Rafe Needleman, ed., dated Aug. 6, 1999, from www.RedHerring.com.Applicant
- Official Sep. 1999 AUP (Auto Update Program) v5.0 Build 447, Product Update Release, winserver.com.Applicant
- Supplementary European Search Report, EP 01977347 dated Apr. 7, 2005.Applicant
- http://web.archive.org/web/20000815053401/www.brightmail.com/corporate/overview/.Applicant
- http://web.archive.org/web/19990128140052/http://www.chooseyourmail.com/.Applicant
- http://web.archive.org/web/20000815064559/www.commtouch.com/solutions/index.shtml.Applicant
- http://web.archive.org/web/20001205151400/mailcircuit.com/route.htm.Applicant
- http://web.archive.org/web/20000824040241/www.messagelabs.com/about/Overview/Overview.htm.Applicant
- http://web.archive.org/web/20000816134259/www.antivirus.com/products/email-groupware.htm.Applicant
- International Search Report, Form PCT/ISA/210 dated Apr. 14, 2004, PCT Application No. PCT/US03/04757.Applicant
- Supplementary European Search Report, EP 03711094.7 dated Sep. 6, 2005.Applicant
- European Examination Report, EP 01977347.2 dated Aug. 26, 2005.Applicant
- “Automated Spam Detection,” R. Lonn, Feb. 16, 1999.Applicant
- Records/Archives in the News, http://listserv.muohio.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind990le&L=archives&T=0&F=&S=&P=6980, Jan. 1999, pp. 5-6.Applicant
- Allegro in the News, Mail.com's Allegro Subsidiary Surpasses 200,000 Corporate Users of its Mailzone Service, http://web.archive.org/web/20040617033735/www.allegro-group.com/news/083199.html, Aug. 31, 1999.Applicant
- MailZone Managed Messaging, MailWatch the Next Generation of MailZone Email Firewall Service is Released, http://web.archive.org/web/19990504151725/http://www.mailzone.net, 2000.Applicant