US 7,203,192 B2Grant
Network packet steering
Issue Date:2007-04-10
•28 Claims
•4 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
Methods and Systems are provided for steering network packets and bridging media channels to a single processing resource. A mapping associates a processing resource with a network interface module (Netmod) or a number of line interface ports included within the Netmod. In one embodiment, the mapping is configurable within the processing resource and pushed to the Netmod. The Netmod uses the mapping to steer network packets to the processing resource when the packets conform to the mapping. Moreover, the mapping can be used to identify a specific process that is to be performed against the packets once the processing resource receives the steered packets from the Netmod.
Metadata
Assignee
- Fortinet, Inc.
Inventors
- Sachin Desai
- Tim Millet
- Zahid Hussain
- Paul Kim
- Louise Yeung
- Ken Yeung
Application Information
Application Number:US 10/163,261
Filing Date:2002-06-04
Priority Date:2002-06-04
Art Unit:2616
Classifications
IPC:
H04L12/54H04J3/16H04J3/22
Patent Drawings (4 sheets)
Description
Copyright Notice/Permission
[0001] A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. The following notice applies to the software descriptions/examples, and data as described below and in the drawings hereto: Copyright© 2002, Cosine Communications, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention is related to network packet steering, and more particularly to network packet steering from a network interface module to a processing resource, which is used to further route the network packet.
Background Information
[0003] In today's highly wired and connected computing environments, networks are often taken for granted by end-users. Yet, heterogeneous networks are often seamlessly and transparently interconnected and made available to the end-users. It is only when a network fails or is degraded that the end-users take notice of the importance associated with having efficient networks.
[0004] A network can be configured in many different manners. A Local Area Network (LAN) is a group of computing devices that share a common communications line. Computing and storage resources can be shared within a LAN. Moreover, a LAN can be as small as a few computing devices or as large as an entire enterprise (e.g., office building, office complex, and the like). Another network configuration is a Wide Area Network (WAN). A WAN is a geographically dispersed telecommunications network. A classic example of a well known WAN is the Internet. A third network configuration is a Metropolitan Area Network (MAN), where computing devices are connected in a geographic region or specific area that is larger than a LAN and smaller than the typical WAN. Also, in recent years a new type of Virtual Private Network (VPN) has emerged in the industry. A VPN is a private network that takes advantage of public telecommunications and maintains privacy through use of tunneling protocols and security procedures.
[0005] Moreover, networks can be characterized by the type of data transmission technology in use on the networks (e.g., Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP), and others). Furthermore, the type of data (e.g., voice versus data) that a network can carry can also distinguish the network. Networks are also classified as public or private, by the usual connection techniques used to access the networks (e.g., switched, dial-up, non-switched, dedicated, virtual, and the like), and by the type of physical links used to interface on the networks (fibre optic, coaxial cable, untwisted shielded pair, and the like).
[0006] Networks of different types can be interconnected through the use of backbones. A backbone is generally a larger transmission line that carries data gathered from smaller lines that interconnect with it. For example, a LAN may use a backbone to connect with a WAN or to span distances within a single LAN. Further, a WAN may use a backbone as a set of paths that local or regional networks connect to for long-distance interconnections.
[0007] When networks are interfaced with one another a number of issues arise. One such issue is how to properly route a received data packet between the networks, since each network may be associated with a different media transmission (e.g., Gigabit Ethernet (GigE), Frame Relay (FR), Time-Division Multiplexing (TDM), Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), and others) and/or a different local data packet-addressing schemes or requirements. Another issue is how to maintain data packet throughput at the point where networks are interfaced with one another. For example, the data packet routing can quickly become a bottleneck in the performance of the network if conversion between disparate media transmissions or addressing schemes is not efficient, especially when a high volume of network traffic is occurring at the point where networks are interfaced together.
[0008] Accordingly, a number of software and/or hardware solutions have sought to increase network traffic throughput at the point where networks are interfaced together. Some of these solutions include routers that determine the next network point that a data packet should be forwarded to within a plurality of networks. Similarly, gateways act as network node that serves as an entrance into another network. Additionally, proxy servers and firewalls act as intermediaries between network connections. Hub devices and bridge devices are also used to collect and route data packets between networks.
[0009] Networks desiring better security and increased throughput of operation will often dedicate computing resources to house, process, and interconnect external and internal network connections. These computing resources use the solutions discussed above (e.g., routers, gateways, firewalls, proxy servers, hub devices, bridge devices and the like). Moreover, often a plurality of solutions is deployed within the dedicated computing resources.
[0010] Some networks that receive a high volume of network traffic often deploy or have computing devices custom developed and installed within the networks to increase operational throughput. For example, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) can have a large number of dedicated and custom developed hardware and software resources to process and route network traffic within the ISP's network. One such hardware and software resource is a high-density server or a blade server that includes physical network interface modules that receive packets from a network. The blade server also includes a switching fabric that passes any received network data packet along to a processing resource within the blade server. The processing resource then properly translates, routes, and/or forwards the received network packet to its destination. In some cases, the destination can be another processing resource within the system.
[0011] Conventionally, the dedicated hardware and software resources are hardwired or statically coded by vendors to meet the needs of a particular customer. Yet, when network traffic patterns for a customer's network change (e.g., decreases or increases), the customer cannot efficiently configure the dedicated hardware and software resources provided by the vendors. As a result, to solve network traffic problems, customers purchase additional hardware and software resources to better meet their then-existing needs. As one of ordinary skill in the art readily appreciates, this is inefficient since many times existing hardware and software resources may be underutilized by the customer in another area of the customer's network.
[0012] Therefore, there is a need for techniques that provide improved custom configurations of hardware and software resources, which are used to facilitate the throughput and to load balance network traffic.
Summary of the Invention
[0013] According to one aspect of the present invention, a method to steer a network packet is presented. A unique identifier for a processing resource is received along with a mapping that associates the unique identifier with a network interface or with one or more components of the network interface. The mapping is provided to the network interface. Furthermore, the mapping is used by the network interface to steer the network packet when the network packet conforms to the mapping.
[0014] According to another aspect of the present, a network interface steering table data structure residing on a computer readable medium is provided. The steering table data structure includes a plurality of interface identifiers, a plurality of sub-interface identifiers associated with each interface identifier. Furthermore, when a packet is received by a network interface, the packet is indexed into the data structure based on the interface identifier of the network interface receiving the packet and the sub-interface identifier associated with the line interface port of the network interface providing the packet. The indexed data structure provides an address to a processing resource where the packet is to be steered and a pointer to a specific process within the processing resource that is used to process the packet.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0015] FIG. 1 shows a diagram of a network packet steering system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[0016] FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a method for steering a network packet, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[0017] FIG. 3 shows a diagram of another network packets steering system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments
[0018] In the following detailed description of various embodiments of the present invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
[0019] As used herein, a “network interface” (Netmod) is a hardware and/or software computing device that connects to telecommunications lines associated with network feeds. Netmods are well known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Netmods come in a variety of configurations and are usually distinguished by the type and number of telecommunication lines that can physically connect to line interface ports of the Netmod.
[0020] Netmods include firmware and software to process raw data being received on a line interface port. Furthermore, some software instructions are processed within a volatile memory of the Netmod. For example, some software instructions permit the recognition of separation of network data packets from a data stream being received over a line interface port.
[0021] In various embodiments of the present invention, conventional Netmods are used to achieve the teachings of the present invention. The Netmods are also connected on the backend (e.g., the side opposite the network feed) to a switching fabric that is used to forward a network data packet received from the Netmod to one or more processing resources. The processing resources include one or more processing elements and memory. Additionally, the processing resources are used to translate, encrypt/decrypt, authenticate, forward and/or route any network data packets received from the switching fabric.
[0022] In one embodiment of the present invention, a plurality of Netmods, a switching fabric, and a plurality of processing resources are assembled as a network routing/switching device, such as a blade server. The blade server is configured and distributed by Cosine Communications, Inc. of Redwood City, Calif. The system can be assembled with a plurality of additional blade servers that interface with one another. Of course as one of ordinary skill in the art readily appreciates, any hardware, firmware, and/or software configuration designed to achieve the tenets of the present disclosure can be used. Thus, all such configurations are intended to fall within the scope of the present invention.
[0023] FIG. 1 illustrates a diagram of a network packet steering system 100, according to the present invention. The steering system 100 includes a plurality of Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120), a switching fabric 112, and a plurality of processing resources (e.g., 124 and 126). The Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120) are connected to telecommunication lines associated with other networks (e.g., 130 and 140). Connections to the telecommunications lines are made via line interface ports included within the Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120).
[0024] The Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120) include memory and processing elements for receiving network data packets from the line interface ports or for sending network data packets out over the line interface ports. In some cases, the memory included within the Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120) is Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), which is volatile memory permitting fast access to data. Moreover, the Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120) are usually associated with a specific type of media channel (e.g., ATM, GigE, TDM, FR, and the like). Additionally, a Netmod (e.g., 110 or 120) can be wireless. Thus, Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120) need not be physically connected to a telecommunications line, but, rather, can be a transceiver for transmitting and receiving wireless (e.g., Radio Frequency (RF), Infrared (IR), Satellite, and the like) network data packets.
[0025] The switching fabric 112 is hardware, firmware, and, in some instances, software instructions that receive forwarded network data packets from the Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120) and rapidly transfer the packet to an appropriate processing resource. Conventionally, switching fabric is hardwired from a specific Netmod to a processing resource. The switching fabric 112 can also receive network data packets from a processing resource (e.g., 124 and 126) and forward the network packets along to the appropriate Netmod (e.g., 110 and 120).
[0026] The processing resources (e.g., 124 and 126) receive network data packets and perform a variety of translations/operations on the network data packets, such as forwarding, routing, encryption/decryption, authentication, and the like.
[0027] The processing resources (e.g., 124 and 126) can be configured through a Graphical User Interface (GUI) application using a configuring software application. The GUI application permits an end-user to assign a unique identifier to a processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126). Moreover, the GUI application permits the end-user to visualize each Netmod (e.g., 110 and 120) and each line interface port assigned to each of the Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120). The GUI application then permits the end-user to make an association between a uniquely identified processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126) and a Netmod (e.g., 110 or 120) or a particular line interface port or a sub-interface associated with a particular Netmod module (e.g., 110 or 120).
[0028] In one embodiment, the GUI application also permits the end-user to visually inspect the processing and memory capabilities of a particular processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126). Thus, the end-user can intelligently make associations between processing resources (e.g., 124 and 126) and Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120) or line interface ports. Moreover, associations can be altered as the network traffic changes to accommodate future needs of the end-user's network. Unlike conventional techniques, the associations between the processing resources (e.g., 124 and 126) and the Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120) or line interface ports are not static and hardwired. Rather, with the present invention the associations are dynamic, virtual, and configurable.
[0029] Once the associations are made, the processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126) that is being assigned pushes the association as a data structure to the volatile memory (e.g., SRAM) of the appropriate Netmod (e.g., 110 or 120). In some embodiments, the data structure is a steering table that includes the identifiers or addresses for the assigned processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126), the assigned Netmod (e.g., 110 or 120), and any assigned line interface port identifiers or sub-interface identifiers associated with each Netmod (e.g., 110 or 120). When a network data packet is then received on the assigned Netmod (e.g., 110 or 120), the table is indexed to determine the assigned processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126) and the processing resource's (e.g., 124 or 126) identifier/address is provided to the switching fabric 112 in order to rapidly steer the network data packet along to the assigned processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126).
[0030] In one embodiment, the table also includes a pointer or identifier to a specific process residing on the processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126). The pointer is then automatically used by the processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126) when the network data packet is steered to the processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126) to cause the network data packet to be processed by the specific resource.
[0031] In some embodiments, a single processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126) can push multiple associations to multiple Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120). Therefore, a single processing resource (e.g., 124 or 126) is capable of receiving and processing network data packets from a plurality of disparate Netmods (e.g., 124 and 126) that are associated with disparate media channels (e.g., ATM, GigE, TDM, FR, wireless, and the like).
[0032] As one of ordinary skill in the art readily appreciates, this provides tremendous flexibility to a network design since with the teachings of the present disclosure, processing resources (e.g., 124 and 126) can be fully utilized and processing can be more easily load balanced. Therefore, an enterprise can dynamically configure or alter the steering system 100 of the present invention to accommodate changes in the enterprise's network traffic without the need to purchase additional expensive hardware and software solutions.
[0033] In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the steering table can be more complex and used to have the Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120) perform filter operations on any received network data packet. These filter operations can be used to determine the context (e.g., state) of a Netmod (e.g., 110 or 120) when a network data packet is received, determine the present volume of traffic on a Netmod (e.g., 110 or 120), and determine the content (e.g., media type) of a network packet. Of course a variety of additional filter operations can be identified in the steering table and processed by the Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120). All such filter operations are intended to fall within the broad scope of the present disclosure.
[0034] The steering system 100 depicted in FIG. 1 is presented for purposes of illustration only, and as one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates, a variety of additional configurations are permissible within the scope of the present invention. Furthermore, it is readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the steering table included within the Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120) permits the Netmods (e.g., 110 and 120) to dynamically acquire intelligence about an incoming network data packet in order to more efficiently steer the incoming data packet. This is a significant improvement over what has been conventionally done, which is statically and rigidly defined in the hardware of the routing/switching computing devices.
[0035] FIG. 2 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 200 for steering a network packet, according to the present invention. In one embodiment, of FIG. 2 the method 200 is implemented within a high-density server or blade server having a plurality of Netmods, a switching fabric, and a plurality of processing resources. Of course, any configuration of computing devices implementing method 200 is intended to fall within the scope of the present disclosure.
[0036] In 210, a unique identifier is received by a processing resource. The unique identifier is used to distinguish the processing resource from other processing resources. The processing resource is used to route, forward, authenticate, encrypt/decrypt, or perform other operations against a network packet. In one embodiment, the unique identifier is received from a GUI application interfaced with the processing resource. Moreover, the unique identifier is modifiable and configurable by the GUI application. Of course any software application, including command line interfaces, can be used to provide the processing resource with the unique identifier.
[0037] Additionally, a mapping, in 220, is received by the processing resource. The mapping logically associates the unique identifier of the processing resource with a Netmod or with one or more components of the Netmod. In one embodiment, the components represent line interface ports embodied in the Netmod. The Netmod receives and transmits network packets from and to other computing devices.
[0038] The mapping, in one embodiment, is received from the GUI application. Further, as depicted in 222, and in some cases, the mapping is represented as a table data structure (e.g. steering table) in memory of the processing resource. The mapping. in some embodiment, includes an identifier/address of the processing resource, an identifier for the Netmod, a plurality of identifiers for line interface ports or sub-interfaces included on the Netmod, and a pointer to a specific process that resides on the processing resource and is used to process any steered network packets. Additionally, the GUI application can be used to publish to an end-user the processing and memory capabilities of the processing resource. Therefore, the end-user can intelligently create and dynamically alter the mapping based on the end-user's network traffic patterns.
[0039] In 230, the mapping is provided by the processing resource to the Netmod. In one instance, the mapping is provided as an in RAM (e.g., SRAM, depicted in 232) table data structure to the Netmod for more efficient processing by the Netmod. Moreover, the mapping can be dynamically pushed to the Netmod from the processing resource. In this way, the mapping is configurable and easily altered as network traffic patterns change.
[0040] Once the Netmod has the mapping, then, in 240, when the Netmod receives a network packet, the mapping can be accessed or inspected in 250. Upon inspecting the mapping, the Netmod associates the unique identifier/address of the assigned processing resource and any process pointer with the network packet and passes the information off to the switching fabric, which rapidly steers the network packet to the processing resource in 260 and automatically performs any process against the network packet, which was identified by any process pointer.
[0041] Therefore, unlike conventional hardwired network switches, the mapping of the present invention represents a virtual switch that permits the Netmod to perform Layer 1 and Layer 2 steering on incoming network packets. Moreover, the virtual switch is easily altered and configured to meet the needs of changing network traffic patterns.
[0042] FIG. 3 illustrates a diagram of another network packet steering system 300, according to the present invention. The steering system 300 includes one or more Netmods (e.g., 310 and 320), one or more processing resources (e.g., 330 and 340). Each Netmod (e.g., 310 or 320) includes a plurality of line interface ports (e.g., 312, 314, 322, and 324). Also, in some embodiments, a switching fabric is interposed between the Netmods (e.g., 310 and 320) and the processing resources (e.g., 330 and 340) (not depicted in FIG. 3 ).
[0043] The processing resources (e.g., 330 and 340) are configurable, uniquely identified, and assigned to a number of the Netmods (e.g., 310 and 320) or to a number of the line interface ports (e.g., 312, 314, 322, and 324). In one embodiment, configuration of the processing resources (e.g., 330 and 340) occurs through a GUI application communicating with the processing resources (e.g., 330 and 340). The GUI application permits dynamic modification to the configured assignment. Moreover, the configured assignment can be intelligently made by an end-user of the GUI application when the processing and memory capabilities of the processing resources (e.g., 330 and 340) are visualized and published through the GUI application to the end-user.
[0044] Configured assignments made within the processing resources (e.g., 330 and 340) are pushed from the respective processing resources (e.g., 330 and 340) to the corresponding Netmods (e.g., 310 and 320). The configured assignments can be represented as a steering table inside the Netmod's (e.g., 310 and 320) volatile memory (e.g., SRAM). The Netmods (e.g., 310 and 320) use the configured assignments when receiving an incoming network packet and the unique identifier associated with the appropriate processing resource (e.g., 330 or 340) in order to steer the incoming network packet to the designated processing resource (e.g., 330 or 340).
[0045] One technique to access the steering table is to index the incoming network packet into the table by the incoming network packet's channel identifier to acquire the appropriate unique identifier for the processing resource (e.g., 330 or 340). Once the unique identifier is associated with the incoming packet it is readily steered to the designated processing resource (e.g., 330 or 340). Corresponding, the identifier, in some embodiments, is an address for the appropriate processing resource (e.g., 330 or 340). Moreover, in one embodiment, the configured assignment also identifies a pointer to a specific process on the appropriate processing resource (e.g., 330 or 340), which is used to automatically process the incoming packet on the appropriate processing resource (e.g., 330 or 340).
[0046] In some instances, the configured assignments can also be used to identify one or more filter operations that the processing resource (e.g., 330 or 340) wants the Netmods (e.g., 310 and 320) to perform on the incoming network packet before steering the incoming network packet. Some example filter operations can include, detecting and communicating a current volume of network traffic, detecting and communicating a content format (e.g., media format) of the incoming packet, and detecting and communicating a context (e.g., processing state) associated with the Netmods (e.g., 310 and 320) when the incoming network packet is received.
Conclusion
[0047] Methods and systems detailed above permit improved network packet steering. These methods and systems create virtual switches. In contrast, traditional approaches have relied on hardwired and static implementations of switches. Accordingly, the present invention permits better utilization and load balancing of an enterprise's network resources.
[0048] Furthermore, the virtual switches of the present invention are dynamically configurable to meet the changing needs of an enterprise's network traffic. In some embodiments, the configuration of the virtual switches can be altered using a GUI application in communication with a processing resource. Moreover, the processing and memory capabilities of the processing resource can be published and made available within the GUI application. In this way, and enterprise can monitor and alter network traffic as needed with the teachings of the present invention, without the need to acquire additional hardware and software resources.
[0049] Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement that is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the present invention. Therefore, it is intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A network packet steering system, comprising:
one or more processing resources provided by a network routing/switching device, wherein the network routing/switching device comprises a blade server including a plurality of network interfaces;
one or more network interfaces of the plurality of network interfaces; and
wherein the one or more processing resources are configurable, uniquely identified, and dynamically assigned to a number of the one or more network interfaces or to a number of line interface ports associated with a network interface of the one or more network interfaces, and wherein the one or more network interfaces steer an incoming network packet within the network routing/switching device to an appropriate processing resource of the one or more processing resources based on the dynamically configured assignment.
2. The network packet steering system of claim 1, wherein the dynamically configured assignment is provided by one or more of the processing resources to the one or more network interfaces, and the dynamically configured assignment is represented as a table data structure within a volatile memory of the one or more network interfaces.
3. The network packet steering system of claim 1, wherein the one or more network interfaces use the dynamically configured assignment to process one or more filter operations on the incoming network packet before steering packet.
4. The network packet steering system of claim 3, wherein the one or more filter operations are used to detect at least one of a current volume of network traffic, a content format of the incoming network packet, and a context within which the incoming network packet is received.
5. The network packet steering system of claim 1, wherein the dynamically configured assignment is based on processing capabilities of the one or more processing resources.
6. A network interface steering table data structure residing on a computer readable medium within a network routing/switching device, comprising:
a plurality of interface identifiers corresponding to network interfaces of the network routing/switching device;
a plurality of sub-interface identifiers associated with each interface identifier of the plurality of interface identifiers;
an address and a pointer corresponding to each sub-interface identifier of the plurality of sub-interface identifiers, the address being associated with a processing resource of the network routing/switching device to which packets arriving on the sub-interface are to be steered, the pointer being associated with a specific process within the processing resource that is to be used to process the packets, and both the address and the pointer are dynamically associated with the sub-interface, wherein the corresponding address and corresponding pointer are dynamically reconfigured to load balance received network traffic among a plurality of processing resources of a networking device; and
wherein when a packet is received by a network interface of the network routing/switching device, the network interface steering table data structure is indexed based on one or more of an interface identifier of the network interface receiving the packet and a sub-interface identifier associated with a line interface port of the network interface on which providing the packet was received, and the network interface steering table data structure provides the corresponding address and the corresponding pointer to facilitate steering of the received packet within the network routing/switching device.
7. The network interface steering table data structure of claim 6, wherein the network interface steering table data structure is created by an interface associated with the processing resource.
8. The network interface steering table data structure of claim 7, wherein the network interface steering table data structure is pushed from the processing resource to the network interface.
9. The network interface steering table data structure of claim 8, wherein the network interface steering table data structure is pushed to a Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) of the network interface.
10. The steering table data structure of claim 6, wherein the specific process comprises at least one of a packet forwarding process, a packet routing process, a packet authentication process, and a packet encryption/decryption process.
11. The steering table data structure of claim 6, wherein the pointer comprises an identifier used by the processing resource to acquire the specific processing resource to process the packet.
12. The steering table data structure of claim 6, wherein the network interface uses the corresponding address and the corresponding pointer to steer the packet to the processing resource and have the specific process performed against the packet on the processing resource.
13. The network interface steering table data structure of claim 6, wherein the corresponding address and corresponding pointer are dynamically reconfigured responsive to network traffic changes.
14. The network interface steering table data structure of claim 6, wherein the corresponding address and corresponding pointer are dynamically reconfigured to facilitate throughput by a networking device.
15. A method comprising:
providing a dynamically configurable mapping that associates each of a plurality of network interfaces of a network routing/switching device or each of one or more components of the plurality of network interfaces with one or more processing resources of a plurality of processing resources of the network routing/switching device;
responsive to receiving a packet on a particular network interface of the plurality of network interfaces, determining an appropriate processing resource of the plurality of processing resources to which the received packet is to be steered by retrieving information indicative of the associated processing resource from the dynamically configurable mapping based on one or more of the particular network interface upon which the received packet arrived and a component of the network interface upon which the received packet arrived; and
load balancing network traffic among the plurality of processing resources by configuring the mapping responsive to a change in one or more network traffic characteristics.
16. The method of claim 15, further comprising reconfiguring the dynamically configurable mapping responsive to processing and memory capabilities of the plurality of processing resources.
17. The method of claim 15, further comprising reconfiguring the dynamically configurable mapping responsive to operational status of the plurality of processing resources.
18. A network packet steering apparatus comprising:
a mapping means for dynamically associating a plurality of network interfaces of a network routing/switching device or one or more components of the plurality of network interfaces with a plurality of processing resources of the network routing/switching device, wherein the network routing/switching device comprises a blade server; and
a steering means, communicatively coupled with the mapping means and responsive to receipt of a packet on a particular network interface of the plurality of network interfaces, for dynamically determining an appropriate processing resource of the plurality of processing resources to which the received packet is to be steered based upon the mapping means.
19. A method comprising:
providing a dynamically configurable mapping that associates each of a plurality of network interfaces of a network routing/switching device or each of one or more components of the plurality of network interfaces with one or more processing resources of a plurality of processing resources of the network routing/switching device;
responsive to receiving a packet on a particular network interface of the plurality of network interfaces, determining an appropriate processing resource of the plurality of processing resources to which the received packet is to be steered by retrieving information indicative of the associated processing resource from the dynamically configurable mapping based on one or more of the particular network interface upon which the received packet arrived and a component of the network interface upon which the received packet arrived; and
load balancing network traffic among the plurality of processing resources by configuring the mapping to account for differing processing capabilities of the plurality of processing resources.
20. The method of claim 19, further comprising reconfiguring the dynamically configurable mapping responsive to processing and memory capabilities of the plurality of processing resources.
21. The method of claim 19, further comprising reconfiguring the dynamically configurable mapping responsive to operational status of the plurality of processing resources.
22. The method of claim 19, wherein the load balancing is accomplished by configuring the mapping responsive to a change in one or more network traffic characteristics.
23. A program on a computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions, which when executed by one or more processors of a network routing/switching device, perform a method comprising:
providing a dynamically configurable mapping that associates each of a plurality of network interfaces of the network routing/switching device or each of one or more components of the plurality of network interfaces with one or more processing resources of a plurality of processing resources of the network routing/switching device;
responsive to receiving a packet on a particular network interface of the plurality of network interfaces, determining an appropriate processing resource of the plurality of processing resources to which the received packet is to be steered by retrieving information indicative of the associated processing resource from the dynamically configurable mapping based on one or more of the particular network interface upon which the received packet arrived and a component of the network interface upon which the received packet arrived; and
load balancing network traffic among the plurality of processing resources by configuring the mapping responsive to a change in one or more network traffic characteristics.
24. The program on a computer-readable medium of claim 23, wherein the method further comprises reconfiguring the dynamically configurable mapping responsive to processing and memory capabilities of the plurality of processing resources.
25. The program on a computer-readable medium of claim 23, wherein the method further comprises reconfiguring the dynamically configurable mapping responsive to operational status of the plurality of processing resources.
26. A program on a computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions, which when executed by one or more processors of a network routing/switching device, perform a method comprising:
providing a dynamically configurable mapping that associates each of a plurality of network interfaces of the network routing/switching device or each of one or more components of the plurality of network interfaces with one or more processing resources of a plurality of processing resources of the network routing/switching device;
responsive to receiving a packet on a particular network interface of the plurality of network interfaces, determining an appropriate processing resource of the plurality of processing resources to which the received packet is to be steered by retrieving information indicative of the associated processing resource from the dynamically configurable mapping based on one or more of the particular network interface upon which the received packet arrived and a component of the network interface upon which the received packet arrived; and
load balancing network traffic among the plurality of processing resources by configuring the mapping to account for differing processing capabilities of the plurality of processing resources.
27. The program on a computer-readable medium of claim 26, wherein the method further comprises reconfiguring the dynamically configurable mapping responsive to processing and memory capabilities of the plurality of processing resources.
28. The program on a computer-readable medium of claim 26, wherein the method further comprises reconfiguring the dynamically configurable mapping responsive to operational status of the plurality of processing resources.
Patent Citations (100)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4667287(A) | 1987-05-01 | Allen et al. | Applicant |
| US5473599(A) | 1995-12-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US5490252(A) | 1996-02-01 | Macera et al. | Applicant |
| US5581705(A) | 1996-12-01 | Passint et al. | Applicant |
| US5633866(A) | 1997-05-01 | Callon | Examiner |
| US5745778(A) | 1998-04-01 | Alfieri | Applicant |
| US5825772(A) | 1998-10-01 | Dobbins et al. | Applicant |
| US5841973(A) | 1998-11-01 | Kessler et al. | Applicant |
| US5875290(A) | 1999-02-01 | Bartfai et al. | Applicant |
| US5963555(A) | 1999-10-01 | Takase et al. | Applicant |
| US5987521(A) | 1999-11-01 | Arrowood et al. | Applicant |
| US6014382(A) | 2000-01-01 | Takihiro et al. | Applicant |
| US6032193(A) | 2000-02-01 | Sullivan | Applicant |
| US6047330(A) | 2000-04-01 | Stracke | Applicant |
| US6069895(A) | 2000-05-01 | Ayandeh | Applicant |
| US6085238(A) | 2000-07-01 | Yuasa et al. | Applicant |
| US6098110(A) | 2000-08-01 | Witkowski et al. | Applicant |
| US6118791(A) | 2000-09-01 | Fichou et al. | Applicant |
| US6137777(A) | 2000-10-01 | Vaid et al. | Applicant |
| US6169739(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Isoyama | Applicant |
| US6169793(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Godwin et al. | Applicant |
| US6175867(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Taghadoss | Applicant |
| US6192051(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Lipman et al. | Applicant |
| US6220768(B1) | 2001-04-01 | Barroux | Applicant |
| US6226788(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Schoening et al. | Applicant |
| US6243580(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Garner | Applicant |
| US6249519(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Rangachar | Examiner |
| US6260072(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Rodriguez | Applicant |
| US6260073(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Walker et al. | Applicant |
| US6266695(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Huang et al. | Applicant |
| US6278708(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Von Hammerstein et al. | Applicant |
| US6286038(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Reichmeyer et al. | Applicant |
| US6295297(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US6298130(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Galvin | Applicant |
| US6320859(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Momirov | Examiner |
| US6330602(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Law et al. | Applicant |
| US6338092(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Chao et al. | Applicant |
| US6405262(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Vogel et al. | Applicant |
| US6414595(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Scrandis et al. | Applicant |
| US6434619(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Lim et al. | Applicant |
| US6449650(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Westfall et al. | Applicant |
| US6463061(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Rekhter et al. | Applicant |
| US6466976(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Alles et al. | Applicant |
| US6526056(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Rekhter et al. | Applicant |
| US6532088(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Dantu | Applicant |
| US6542466(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Pashtan et al. | Applicant |
| US6556544(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US6608816(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Nichols | Applicant |
| US6636516(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Yamano | Applicant |
| US6639897(B1) | 2003-10-01 | Shiomoto et al. | Applicant |
| US6658013(B1) | 2003-12-01 | de Boer et al. | Applicant |
| US6697359(B1) | 2004-02-01 | George | Examiner |
| US6697360(B1) | 2004-02-01 | Gai et al. | Applicant |
| US6738371(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Ayres | Applicant |
| US6775267(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Kung | Applicant |
| US6775284(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Calvignac et al. | Examiner |
| US6868082(B1) | 2005-03-01 | Allen et al. | Examiner |
| US6883170(B1) | 2005-04-01 | Garcia | Applicant |
| US6938097(B1) | 2005-08-01 | Vincent et al. | Examiner |
| US6944128(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Nichols | Applicant |
| US6944168(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Paatela et al. | Examiner |
| US6954429(B2) | 2005-10-01 | Horton et al. | Applicant |
| US6985438(B1) | 2006-01-01 | Tschudin | Applicant |
| US7020143(B2) | 2006-03-01 | Zdan | Applicant |
| US7042848(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Santiago et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0043571(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Jang et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0048661(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Clear et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0052013(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Munguia et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0062344(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Ylonen et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0066034(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Schlossberg et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0075901(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Perlmutter et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0097872(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Barbas et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0099849(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Alfieri et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0152373(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Sun et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0186661(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Santiago et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0188657(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Traversat et al. | Examiner |
| US2002/0191604(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Mitchell et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0033401(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Poisson et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0108041(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Aysan | Applicant |
| US2003/0115308(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Best et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0117954(A1) | 2003-06-01 | De Neve et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0131228(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Tworney | Applicant |
| US2003/0169747(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Wang | Examiner |
| US2003/0200295(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Roberts et al. | Examiner |
| US2003/0212735(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Hicok et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0223406(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Balay | Applicant |
| US2003/0223456(A1) | 2003-12-01 | DiMambro | Examiner |
| US2004/0042416(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Ngo et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0095934(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Cheng et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0141521(A1) | 2004-07-01 | George | Examiner |
| US2004/0160900(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Lund et al. | Examiner |
| US2004/0199567(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Lund | Examiner |
| US2004/0199568(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Lund | Examiner |
| US2004/0199569(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Kalkunte et al. | Examiner |
| US2006/0087969(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Santiago et al. | Applicant |
| WO51290 | 2000-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO76152 | 2000-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO163809 | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO223855 | 2002-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO310323 | 2003-12-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (11)
- Chan, Mun C. et al., “An architecture for broadband virtual networks under customer control.” IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium. Apr. 1996. pp. 135-144.Applicant
- Chan, Mun C. et al “Customer Management and Control of Broadband VPN Services.” Proc. Fifth IFIP/IEEE International Symposium of Integrated Network Management. May 1997. pp. 301-314.Applicant
- Gasparro, D.M., “Next-Gen VPNs: The Design Challenge.” Data Communications. Sep. 1999. pp. 83-95.Applicant
- Hanaki, M. et al., “LAN/WAN management integration using ATM CNM interface.” IEEE Network Operations Management Symposium, vol. 1. Apr. 1996. pp. 12-21.Applicant
- Kapustka, S., “CoSine Communications Move VPNs ‘Into the Cloud’ with the Leading Managed IP Service Delivery Platform.” http://wwwcosinecom.com/news/pr—5—24.html. Press Release, CoSine Communications. 1995. p. 5.Applicant
- Keshav, S., “An Engineering Approach to Computer Networking: ATM networks, the internet, and the telephone network.” Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley, Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series. 1992. pp. 318-324.Applicant
- Kim, E.C. et al., “The Multi-Layer VPN Management Architecture.” Proc. Sixth IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management. May 1999. pp. 187-200.Applicant
- Rao, J.R., Intranets and VPNS: Strategic Approach. 1988 Annual Review of Communications. 1998. pp. 669-674.Applicant
- Tanenbaum, A.S., “Computing Networks.” Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall PTR, 3rd Edition. 1996. pp. 348-364.Applicant
- European Search Report for PCT/US03/37009 (Jul. 4, 2004) 2 pgs.Applicant
- International Search Report for PCTUS03/17674. 6 pgs.Applicant