US 7,060,798 B2Grant
Modified protein adhesives and lignocellulosic composites made from the adhesives
Issue Date:2006-06-13
•43 Claims
•4 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
An adhesive composition made by reacting a soy protein with at least one compound under conditions sufficient for introducing additional phenolic hydroxyl functional groups, amine functional groups, and/or thiol functional groups into the soy protein structure.
Metadata
Assignee
- State of Oregon Acting by and through the Oregon State Board of Higher Education on Behalf of Oregon State University
Inventors
- Kaichang Li
- Yuan Liu
Application Information
Application Number:US 10/437,595
Filing Date:2003-05-13
Priority Date:2002-05-13
Art Unit:1654
Classifications
IPC:
A23J1/14C09F1/00C09F1/02
Patent Drawings (4 sheets)
Description
PRIORITY
[0001] This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 60/380,366, filed May 13, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD
[0002] The present disclosure relates to adhesives and lignocellulosic composites made from the adhesives.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Lignocellulosic-based composites are formed from small dimension pieces of cellulosic material that are bonded with an adhesive (i.e., a binder). In general, solid wood is fragmented into smaller pieces such as strands, fibers, and chips. An adhesive composition then is added to the wood component. The resulting mixture is subjected to heat and pressure resulting in a composite. The adhesive mix typically is the only non-lignocellulosic component.
[0004] The most commonly used wood adhesives are phenol-formaldehyde resins (PF) and urea-formaldehyde resins (UF). There are at least two concerns with PF and UF resins. First, volatile organic compounds (VOC) are generated during the manufacture and use of lignocellulosic-based composites. An increasing concern about the effect of emissive VOC, especially formaldehyde, on human health has prompted a need for more environmentally acceptable adhesives. Second, PF and UF resins are made from petroleum-derived products. The reserves of petroleum are naturally limited. The wood composite industry would greatly benefit from the development of formaldehyde-free adhesives made from renewable natural resources.
[0005] Soy protein was used as a wood adhesive for the production of plywood from the 1930's to the 1960's. Petroleum-derived adhesives replaced soy protein adhesives due to the relatively low bonding strength and water resistance of soy protein adhesives. However, soy protein is an inexpensive, abundant, renewable material that is environmentally acceptable.
SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0006] Disclosed herein are adhesive compositions made by reacting a protein with at least one compound under conditions sufficient for introducing additional phenolic functional groups, amine functional groups, and/or thiol functional groups into the protein structure.
[0007] One example of an adhesive composition disclosed herein includes a reaction product of soy protein with at least one compound under conditions sufficient for introducing additional phenolic hydroxyl, amino, imino and/or thiol functional groups into the soy protein structure. The additional functional groups typically are present in terminal, pendant, or terminal and pendant positions in the soy protein structure.
[0008] A further example of an adhesive composition disclosed herein includes a reaction product of soy protein and at least one compound, wherein the compound includes (i) at least one first functional group selected from phenolic hydroxyl, thiol, amino, and imino, and (ii) at least one second functional group for covalently bonding the compound to the soy protein.
[0009] In a first, more specific approach, the adhesive composition includes a reaction product of protein and a compound, wherein the compound includes (i) at least one first functional group selected from phenolic hydroxyl and thiol and (ii) at least one amino functional group, and the amino functional group of the compound covalently bonds to a carboxylic acid functional group of the protein.
[0010] In a second, more specific approach, the adhesive composition includes modified protein made by initially reacting protein and a first compound that includes at least one nitrogen-containing functional group under conditions sufficient for covalently bonding the nitrogen-containing functional group with a functional group of the protein resulting in an amine-augmented protein. The amine-augmented protein then is reacted with at least one phenolic compound under conditions sufficient for covalently bonding the phenolic compound to the amine-augmented protein to produce the modified protein adhesive.
[0011] In a third, more specific approach, the adhesive composition includes a modified protein made by initially reacting protein and a phenolic or thiol compound under conditions sufficient for forming at least one ether, ester or amide linkage between the phenolic or thiol compound and the protein resulting in a thiol- or phenolic hydroxyl-augmented protein. The thiol- or phenolic hydroxyl-augmented protein then is reacted with a compound that includes at least one nitrogen-containing functional group under conditions sufficient for covalently bonding at least one amino functional group to the thiol- or phenolic hydroxyl-augmented protein.
[0012] Also disclosed herein are methods for making lignocellulosic composites from the adhesive compositions and the resulting composites.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013] Certain embodiments will be described in more detail with reference to the following drawing:
[0014] FIG. 1 shows a synthesis scheme for producing an example of the presently described adhesive;
[0015] FIG. 2 is a graph depicting the lap-shear strength of examples of the presently described adhesives and a comparative example;
[0016] FIG. 3 is a graph depicting the lap-shear strength of an example of the presently described adhesives and a comparative example;
[0017] FIG. 4 shows a synthesis scheme for producing a further example of the presently described adhesive; and
[0018] FIG. 5 is a graph depicting the lap-shear strength of an adhesive made according to the synthesis scheme shown in FIG. 4 .
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL EMBODIMENTS
[0019] The presently disclosed adhesives may be made by modifying a protein to increase the number of phenolic hydroxyl groups, amino or imino, and/or thiol (i.e., mercapto) functional groups existing in the protein structure. In other words, the resulting modified protein structure (i.e., the protein residue) includes an additional number of covalently bonded phenolic hydroxyl groups, amino or imino, and/or thiol functional groups beyond those already existing in the unmodified protein structure. In particular, the additional phenolic hydroxyl groups, amino or imino, and/or thiol groups are introduced in terminal and/or pendant positions in the protein residue structure. As a result of their terminal and/or pendant position, the additional phenolic hydroxyl groups, amino, imino, or thiol groups are free for substrate adhesive bonding and crosslinking when the adhesive composition is heated as described below. These additional free functional groups typically are covalently bonded to the protein structure via linking groups such as amides, ethers, or esters.
[0020] The modified protein structure may include one or more types of additional free functional groups. For example, the modified protein structure may include only phenolic hydroxyl, amino or thiol groups. However, according to another embodiment, the modified protein structure may include additional phenolic hydroxyl groups and amino groups. In an additional variant, the modified protein structure may include additional thiol groups and phenolic hydroxyl groups. In a further variant, the modified protein structure may include additional phenolic hydroxyl groups, thiol groups, and amino groups.
[0021] According to particular examples of the adhesive, the protein may be modified to incorporate about 0.1 weight percent to about 30 weight percent additional phenolic compounds, about 0.1 weight percent to about 30 weight percent additional amine compounds, and/or about 0.1 weight percent to about 30 weight percent thiol compounds, based on the total weight of the modified protein. The inventors have found that augmenting the number of amine, phenolic groups, and/or thiol groups in a protein structure provides an adhesive having superior adhesive strength and water resistance.
[0022] The protein undergoing modification typically is any protein that is readily available from a renewable source. Examples of such proteins include soy protein, keratin, gelatin, collagen, gluten, and casein. The protein may have been pretreated to obtain a material that is soluble or dispersible in water as is known in the art.
[0023] Soy protein is an exemplary protein for use in the presently described adhesives. Soybeans contain about 38 weight percent protein with the remaining portion comprising carbohydrates, oils and moisture. Soybeans are processed to increase the amount of soy protein in the processed product. Soy protein products of any form may be utilized in the disclosed adhesive compositions. The three most common soy protein products are soy flour, soy protein concentrate, and soy protein isolate (SPI). One difference between these products is the amount of soy protein. Soy flour includes approximately 50 weight percent protein, soy protein concentrate includes at least about 65 weight percent protein (dry weight), and SPI includes at least about 85 weight percent protein (dry weight). According to certain embodiments of the adhesive composition, the soy protein is SPI.
[0024] The protein may be prepared for use in the adhesive compositions in any manner. Typically, the protein is included in a carrier or delivery liquid such as water or similar solvent. In particular, the protein may be dissolved in water and the resulting aqueous solution mixed with the modifying reactant(s) described above. The aqueous adhesive solution may be prepared, for example, by initially mixing the protein in water and adjusting the pH of the mixture to the desired range. When the protein is mixed with the modifying reactant(s), the pH of the protein part may be acidic or alkaline. For example, the pH of the protein part may be about 5 to about 8 for the reaction of the protein with an amine compound. However, when the modified protein is used as a wood adhesive, the pH value should be between about 4.5 to about 11. The pH may be adjusted by adding basic substances such as, for example, alkali hydroxides, or by adding acidic substances such as inorganic acids or organic acids. The amount of protein dissolved in the water may be adjusted to provide the desired solids content for the adhesive composition. The protein solids content may be, for example, from about 10 to about 60 weight percent. The protein solution may be freeze-dried at this stage of formulation or it may remain as a liquid solution. If the protein solution is freeze-dried, water (or the appropriate carrier fluid) is simply added to the freeze-dried substance prior to use. Freeze-drying will reduce the cost of transporting the adhesive.
[0025] There are a number of synthesis variations for modifying the protein to increase the number of phenolic hydroxyl groups, amino or imino functional groups, and/or thiol functional groups. In a first variant, the protein may be reacted with a multifunctional compound that includes (i) a first functional group selected from a phenolic hydroxyl, a thiol, or an amino and (ii) a second functional group that can form a covalent bond with the protein. The second functional group may be an amino, carboxyl, hydroxyl, or similar protein-reactive group. In examples of the first variant, the protein may be reacted with a multifunctional compound that includes both phenolic hydroxyl and amino functional groups (or both thiol and amino functional groups) that can be introduced into the protein structure. The amino functional groups react with the carboxyl functional groups of the protein to form amide linking groups. In a second variant, the protein may be initially reacted with a nitrogen-donating compound for producing an amine-augmented protein that is subsequently reacted with a phenolic hydroxyl-donating compound for producing the final modified protein adhesive. In a third variant, the protein may be initially reacted with a phenolic hydroxyl-donating compound for producing a phenolic hydroxyl-augmented protein that is subsequently reacted with a thiol- or nitrogen-donating compound for producing the final modified protein adhesive. Each synthesis variant will be described below in more detail. In all of the variants, all of the reactants may be in the form of aqueous solutions or dispersions. Thus, volatile organic solvents as carrier fluids can be avoided.
[0026] With reference to the first variant, illustrative multifunctional compounds for reacting with the protein to introduce free phenolic hydroxyl groups include dopamine (i.e., 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethylamine hydrochloride), tyramine (4-hydroxyphenylethylamine hydrochloride), DOPA (3,4-dihydroxyphenyl-L-alanine), 2-aminophenol, 3-aminophenol, and 4-aminophenol. Illustrative multifunctional compounds for reacting with the protein to introduce free thiol groups include cysteamine, cysteine, glutathione, five-membered dithiocarbonates (i.e., compounds with the basic structure of 1,3-oxathiolane-2-thione), γ-thiobutyrolactone, mercaptoacetic acid, 2-mercaptoethanol, 3-mercaptopropionic acid, and (3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane. Illustrative multifunctional compounds for reacting with the protein to introduce free amino groups include alkyl amines (e.g., 1,3-diaminopropane, 1,6-hexanediamine, ethylene diamine, diethylenetriamine), unsaturated hydrocarbon amines (e.g., allylamine), hydroxy amines (e.g.,ethanolamine, hydroxyamine), amidines (e.g., melamine), imines (e.g., polyethyleneimine), amino acids (e.g., 4-aminobutyric acid, 6-aminocaprioc acid), polyamines, polyamides, and mixtures thereof. In the case of the diamines, triamines or polyamines, one or more, but not all, of the amino groups may form the covalent bond with the protein. The amino group(s) that do not covalently bond with the protein then are available to serve as the free functional group for adhesive bonding purposes.
[0027] The multifunctional compounds may be reacted with the protein via a chemical process that includes blocking certain phenolic hydroxyl groups, thiol groups and/or amino groups of the multifunctional compounds. Alternatively, the multifunctional compounds may be reacted with a protein in a one-step enzymatic process that does not require blocking of phenolic hydroxyl groups, thiol groups and/or amino groups of the multifunctional compounds.
[0028] With respect to the chemical process, the phenolic hydroxyl groups, thiol groups and/or amino groups whose reaction with the protein during the protein modification is undesirable would be initially protected with a group that is non-reactive with functional groups of the protein. Such protection processes may include the formation of ethers, esters, amides, or thiol-esters. The protein then is reacted with the selectively protected multifunctional compound under conditions sufficient for forming a covalent bond between a functional group of the protein (typically a carboxylic acid, amino, hydroxyl or thio functional group) and an amino group or carboxylic acid group of the multifunctional compound. The conditions for this reaction may vary depending upon the protein and multifunctional compound but, in general, the reaction may occur at about 4 to about 200° C. In addition, there may be additives or catalysts involved in this reaction such as carboxylic-acid-activating agents (e.g., 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), transglutaminase, and lipase). Finally, the remaining protected phenolic hydroxyl groups, thiol groups and/or amino groups of the modified protein are deprotected by reaction with acids such as HBr, acetic acid, trifluoracetic acid, sulfuric acid, and HCl or with an alkali such as sodium hydroxide. The conditions for the unblocking reaction may vary depending upon the protein and unblocking reactant but, in general, the reaction may occur at about 20 to about 150° C.
[0029] With respect to the enzymatic process, the multifunctional compound, the protein and an enzyme catalyst may be mixed together. The enzyme catalyzes the formation of an amide or an ester covalent bond between a carboxylic acid group of the protein and an amino group/hydroxyl group of the multifunctional compound or between an amino group/hydroxyl group of the protein and a carboxylic acid of the multifunctional compound. Illustrative enzyme catalysts include transglutaminases and lipases. The conditions for the catalyzed enzymatic reaction may vary depending upon the protein, enzyme, and multifunctional compound but, in general, the reaction may occur at about 4 to about 70° C. The pH value should be at about 3 to about 9.
[0030] The second variant involves reacting the protein with a nitrogen-donating compound under conditions sufficient for covalently bonding at least one amino group to the protein structure. According to illustrative examples, the nitrogen-donating compound reacts with the carboxylic acid groups of the protein. The reaction conditions may vary depending upon the particular protein and nitrogen-donating compound, but in general the reaction temperature may range from about 4 to about 200° C. Additives or catalysts that may be involved in this reaction include carboxylic-acid-activating agents such as 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), transglutaminase, and lipase.
[0031] Suitable nitrogen-donating compounds include compounds that contain at least one amino or imino group. Illustrative nitrogen-donating compounds include alkyl amines (e.g., 1,3-diaminopropane, 1,6-hexanediamine, ethylene diamine, diethylenetriamine), unsaturated hydrocarbon amines (e.g., allylamine), hydroxy amines (e.g.,ethanolamine, hydroxyamine), amidines (e.g., melamine), imines (e.g., polyethyleneimine), amino acids (e.g., 4-aminobutyric acid, 6-aminocaprioc acid), polyamines, polyamides, and mixtures thereof. The nitrogen-donating compound may be water-soluble or water-dispersible.
[0032] The phenolic hydroxyl-donating compound may react with the amine-augmented protein by various synthetic approaches. For example, via oxidation intermediates (e.g., quinones and aromatic rings) of phenolic hydroxyl groups of the phenolic-donating compound reacting with amino functional group of the amine-augmented protein. Illustrative phenolic-donating compounds include dopamine, DOPA (3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine); caffeic acid; catechol; 4-methylcatechol; 4-hydroxycinnamic acid; 4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamic acid; 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxycinnamic acid; tannin; flavonoids; lignin; and poly(4-vinylphenol). The conditions for the reaction may vary depending upon the protein and phenolic hydroxyl-donating compound but, in general, the reaction may occur during the pressing of wood composites at about 100 to about 200° C. for about 0.5 to about 10 minutes. The amine-augmented protein can also be used as one part of a two-part adhesive system in which the second part is the phenolic hydroxyl-donating compound.
[0033] With respect to the third variant, the protein is initially reacted with a phenolic hydroxyl-donating compound under the conditions described above. The phenolic hydroxyl-augmented protein then is reacted with a thiol-donating or nitrogen-donating compound under the conditions described above. Illustrative thiol-donating compounds include cysteamine, cysteine, glutathione, five-membered dithiocarbonates (i.e., compounds with the basic structure of 1,3-oxathiolane-2-thione), γ-thiobutyrolactone, mercaptoacetic acid, 2-mercaptoethanol, 3-mercaptopropionic acid, and (3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane. The phenolic hydroxyl-augmented protein can also be used as one part of a two-part adhesive system in which the second part is the nitrogen-donating compound or thiol-donating compound.
[0034] According to particular embodiments, the phenolic compound that is covalently bonded to the protein includes two phenolic hydroxyl groups in an ortho position relative to each other on the aromatic ring. Two phenolic hydroxyl groups should provide superior bonding strength. If only one phenolic hydroxyl group is present, an enzyme such as phenol-oxidative enzymes such as laccases, polyphenoloxidases or tyrosinases may be added as a curing agent.
[0035] The adhesive composition may also include additives and fillers found in lignocellulosic adhesives such as bactericides, insecticides, silica, wheat flour, tree bark flour, nut shell flour and the like.
[0036] The adhesive compositions are heat-curable. Such curing typically occurs during the hot pressing step of the lignocellulosic composite formation. Thus, the cure temperature of the adhesive composition is tailored so that it coincides with the heating temperatures used in composite formation. Such cure temperatures may range, for example, from about 100 to about 200° C., more particularly from about 120 to about 170° C.
[0037] Lignocellulosic composites that can be produced with the adhesives described herein include particleboard, oriented strand board (OSB), waferboard, fiberboard (including medium-density and high-density fiberboard), parallel strand lumber (PSL), laminated strand lumber (LSL), and similar products. In general, these composites are made by first blending comminuted lignocellulosic materials with an adhesive that serves as a binder that adheres the comminuted lignocellulosic materials into a unitary densified mass. Examples of suitable lignocellulosic materials include wood, straw (including rice, wheat and barley), flax, hemp and bagasse. The comminuted lignocellulosic materials can be in any processed form such as chips, flakes, fibers, strands, wafers, trim, shavings, sawdust, straw, stalks and shives. The resultant mixture is formed into the desired configuration such as a mat, and then processed, usually under pressure and with heat, into the final product. Processes are generally carried out at temperatures of from about 120 to 225° C. in the presence of varying amounts of steam, generated by liberation of entrained moisture from the lignocellulose materials. Thus, the moisture content of the lignocellulose material may be between about 2 and about 20 percent by weight, before it is blended with the adhesive.
[0038] The amount of adhesive mixed with the lignocellulosic particles may vary depending, for example, upon the desired composite type, lignocellulosic material type and amount of, and particular type of, adhesive composition. In general, about 1 to about 12, more particularly about 3 to about 10, weight percent adhesive may be mixed with the lignocellulosic material, based on the total combined weight of adhesive and lignocellulosic material. The mixed adhesive composition may be added to the comminuted lignocellulosic particles by spraying or similar techniques while the lignocellulosic particles are tumbled or agitated in a blender or similar mixer. For example, a stream of the comminuted lignocellulosic particles may be intermixed with a stream of the mixed adhesive composition and then be subjected to mechanical agitation.
[0039] The adhesive compositions also may be used to produce plywood, hardboard or laminated veneer lumber (LVL). The adhesive composition may be applied onto veneer surfaces by roll coating, knife coating, curtain coating, or spraying. A plurality of veneers are then laid-up to form sheets of required thickness. The mats or sheets are then placed in a heated press (e.g., a platen) and compressed to effect consolidation and curing of the materials into a board. Fiberboard may be made by the wet felted/wet pressed method, the dry felted/dry pressed method, or the wet felted/dry pressed method.
[0040] The presently disclosed adhesive provides a strong bond between the lignocellulosic particles or fractions. The adhesive also provides structural composites with high mechanical strength. In addition, the adhesive composition is substantially free of formaldehyde (including any compounds that may degenerate to form formaldehyde). For example, the adhesive compositions do not contain any formaldehyde (and formaldehyde-generating compounds) that is detectable by conventional methods or, alternatively, the amount of formaldehyde (and formaldehyde-generating compounds) is negligible from an environmental and workplace regulatory standpoint.
[0041] The specific examples described below are for illustrative purposes and should not be considered as limiting the scope of the appended claims.
EXAMPLE 1
Preparation of Alkali-Modified Soy Protein Isolate
[0042] SPI powder (10 g) was mixed with 140 ml of distilled water at room temperature and then stirred for 120 minutes. The pH value of the mixture was then adjusted to 10 using sodium hydroxide (1 M). The mixture was subsequently mixed in a shaker at 50° C. and 180 rpm for 120 minutes. The insoluble portion was removed through filtration and the aqueous SPI solution was freeze-dried.
EXAMPLE 2
Preparation of Phenolic Hydroxyl-Augmented SPI-Dopamine
[0043] A reaction synthesis for preparing a phenolic hydroxyl-augmented SPI-dopamine is shown in FIG. 1 . A mixture of dopamine (DA) (1.0 g) and dichlorodiphenyl methane (3.16 g) was slowly stirred at 1 90° C. After the reaction started, as evidenced by rigorous gas evolution, the reaction mixture was stirred rapidly at 190° C. for 6 minutes. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and then washed by diethyl ether. The product ((1)—O, O′-diphenylmethyl-dopamine hydrochloride) was crystallized from methanol and ethyl acetate (1.36 g, 73 percent).
[0044] To a suspension of the alkaline SPI of Example 1 (1.0 g) in 40 ml of tetrahydrofuran (THF)-H2O (1:1, v/v) was added a solution of compound 1 (2.07 g) in THF-H2O (1:1, v/v) (20 ml). The resulting mixture was adjusted to a pH value of 5.5. A solution of 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) (1.8 g) and THF-H2O (1:1, v/v) (20 ml) was added to the reaction mixture dropwise in 1 hour while maintaining the pH value at 5.5. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight and then centrifuged. The precipitate 2 was collected and washed with EtOAc (2 times) and deionized water (2 times).
[0045] To a solution of the protected SPI-DA (compound 2) (1.0 g) in TFA (10 ml) was added 33 percent HBr-AcOH (10 ml) with stirring. The mixture was stirred for 1 hour at room temperature. The deprotected SPI-DA (compound 3) was precipitated by addition of diethyl ether, washed extensively with water-ethanol (1:4, v/v), and then freeze-dried.
[0046] The amount of dopamine in the dopamine-modified SPI was determined as explained below. The protected SPI-DA (20 mg) was hydrolyzed in 4 ml of 6N HCl solution for 24 hours at 110° C. The hydrolyzed product was diluted with deionized water to 100 ml. To 1.0 ml of the diluted solution was added water (1.0 ml), sodium nitrite-sodium molybdate stock solution (NaNO2, 100 g and Na2MoO4, 100 g in 1.0 liter of deionized water) (1.0 ml), and 1N sodium hydroxide (1.0 ml). Absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 500 nm, and corrected by a control (Protected SPI-DA was replaced with the alkaline SPI in the above procedure). The concentration of dopamine was then determined by use of a dopamine standard curve. The dopamine standard curve was obtained as follows: an aqueous dopamine solution (1.0 ml) with predetermined concentration of dopamine was mixed with water (1.0 ml), the sodium nitrite-sodium molybdate stock solution (1.0 ml), and 1N sodium hydroxide (1.0 ml). Absorbance of the resulting solution was read at 500 nm. The linear relationship between the absorbance and the concentration of dopamine was used to construct a dopamine standard curve.
EXAMPLE 3
Preparation and Testing Wood Composites
[0047] A solution of water and the modified SPI of Example 2 (6:1 wt. ratio) was applied to one surface of a maple veneer strip (100×60 mm, 0.6 mm thick). About 2.5 mg modified SPI was applied to the maple veneer. The bonding area was 2×2.5 cm. Two pieces of maple veneer strips were stacked together and hot-pressed at 120° C. for 10 minutes. The applied pressure was 20 kg/cm2.
[0048] Lap-shear strengths of the resulting wood assembly specimens were tested using an Instron TTBML testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute. The maximum shear strength at breakage was recorded. In water resistance testing, the specimens were soaked in water at room temperature for 24 hours then dried at room temperature in a fume hood for 24 hours and the shear strengths of the specimens were measured. The soaking-and-drying cycle was repeated and the shear strengths were measured after each soaking-and-drying cycle.
[0049] The lap-shear strength results are shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 . The amount of dopamine grafted to the SPI was varied by changing the amount of compound 1 and EDC. As shown in FIG. 2 grafting of the dopamine (DA) to the SPI greatly increased the shear strength compared to an ungrafted alkali-SPI. Even after three soaking-and-drying cycles, the shear strengths of the wood specimens bonded with SPI-DA did not decrease. As a matter of fact, the shear strengths of specimens bonded with SPI-DA with a DA content of 14.73 weight percent increased after the first soaking-and-drying cycle. When the DA content increased from 4.12 weight percent to 8.95 weight percent, the shear strengths increased significantly. However, the shear strengths decreased when the DA content increased from 8.95 weight percent to 14.73 weight percent. The increase in the shear strengths was due to the phenolic hydroxy groups in DA. FIG. 3 demonstrates the difference in shear strength between protected SPI-DA (referred to as compound 2 in FIG. 1 ) and the unblocked SPI-DA (referred to as compound 3 in FIG. 1 ).
EXAMPLE 4
Synthesis of S-Acetyl Cysteamine
[0050] The thiol groups of cysteamine were blocked according to the following procedure. Acetyl chloride (10 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of cysteamine hydrochloride (2 g) and trifluoroacetic acid (10 ml). The reaction mixture was stirred under room temperature for 1 hour. The product precipitated out by adding ethyl ether. The precipitate was crystallized in methanol-ethyl ether to give pure S-acetyl cysteamine (“ACA”).
EXAMPLE 5
Preparation of Thiol-Augmented SPI
[0051] A reaction synthesis for preparing a thiol-augmented SPI is shown in FIG. 4 . A solution of ACA (3.36 g, 21.47 mmol) and THF/H2O (1:1, v/v; 100 mL) was added to a suspension of the alkaline SPI of Example 1 (5.00 g) in 200 ml of THF/H2O (1:1, V/V). The pH value of the resulting mixture was adjusted to 5.5. A solution of EDC (9 g, 46.9 mmol) and THF/H2O (1:1, V/V; 100 ml) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture in 1 hour while maintaining the pH value at 5.5. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight and then centrifuged. The precipitate was collected and washed with ethyl acetate (2 times) and deionized water (2 times) and then freeze-dried. Several different modified SPI-ACAs were produced under the reaction conditions shown below in Table 1.
[0052]
| TABLE 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Modified SPIs | SPI | ACA | EDC |
| A1 | 5 g | 0.84 g (5.37 mmol) | 2.25 g (11.74 mmol) |
| A2 | 5 g | 1.68 g (10.73 mmol) | 4.50 g (23.47 mmol) |
| A3 | 5 g | 3.36 g (21.46 mmol) | 9.00 g (46.95 mmol) |
[0053] In order to de-protect the thiol groups, a 0.2 N NaOH solution (100 mL) was bubbled with a nitrogen stream for 15 min. SPI-ACA (2.0 g) was added in the NaOH solution and stirred for 1 hour. The resulting mixture was neutralized by HCl to pH 7 and ultrafiltrated with a membrane (10,000 kDa molecular weight cutoff) under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The SPI-CA was freeze-dried.
EXAMPLE 6
Preparation and Testing Wood Composites
[0054] Maple veneer with a thickness of 0.6 mm was cut into pieces with the dimension of 7.5×12 cm. A glue mixture containing water/SPI-CA (6:1 weight ratio) was pasted to one side of the maple veneer samples. The adhesive-pasted area for each piece of veneer sample was 1.5×12 cm. The amount of glue was 2.5 mg/cm2 (dry weight). Two pieces of adhesive-pasted veneer were lapped together and then pressed at 20 kg/cm2 and 120° C. for 10 minutes. Subsequently, the plywood sample was cut into 6 specimens. Each specimen had a bond area of 2×1.5 cm2. Lap-shear strengths of the resulting wood assembly specimens were tested as described above in Example 3. The results are shown in FIG. 5 .
[0055] Having illustrated and described the principles of the disclosed compositions, methods and composites with reference to several embodiments, it should be apparent that these compositions, methods and composites may be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An adhesive composition comprising a reaction product of soy protein and a compound, wherein the compound includes (i) at least one first functional group selected from phenolic hydroxyl or thiol and (ii) at least one amino functional group, and the amino functional group of the compound covalently bonds to a carboxylic acid functional group of the soy protein.
2. An adhesive composition according to claim 1, wherein the phenolic hydroxyl functional group includes two phenolic hydroxyl groups in an ortho position relative to each other on the aromatic ring.
3. An adhesive composition comprising a modified soy protein made by:
(i) reacting a soy protein and a first compound that contains at least one amino functional group under conditions sufficient for covalently bonding the amino functional group with a functional group of the soy protein resulting in an amine-augmented soy protein; and
(ii) reacting the amine-augmented soy protein with at least one phenolic compound under conditions sufficient for covalently bonding the phenolic compound to the amine-augmented soy protein resulting in a phenolic/amine-augmented soy protein.
4. An adhesive composition according to claim 3, wherein the phenolic compound includes two phenolic hydroxyl groups in an ortho position relative to each other on the aromatic ring.
5. An adhesive composition comprising a modified soy protein made by:
(i) reacting a soy protein and a phenolic compound under conditions sufficient for forming at least one ether, ester or amide linkage between the phenolic compound and the soy protein resulting in a phenolic hydroxyl-augmented soy protein; and
(ii) reacting the phenolic hydroxyl-augmented soy protein with a compound that includes at least one thiol or amino functional group under conditions sufficient for covalently bonding the thiol or amino functional group to the phenolic hydroxyl-augmented soy protein resulting in a phenolic hydroxyl/thiol-augmented soy protein or a phenolic hydroxyl/amino-augmented soy protein.
6. An adhesive composition according to claim 5, wherein the phenolic compound includes two phenolic hydroxyl groups in an ortho position relative to each other on the aromatic ring.
7. An adhesive composition comprising the reaction product of soy protein with at least one compound under conditions sufficient for introducing additional functional groups into the soy protein structure, wherein the additional functional groups comprise at least one group selected from phenolic hydroxyl, amino, imino or thiol, and the additional functional groups are present in terminal, pendant, or terminal and pendant positions in the soy protein structure.
8. A method for making a lignocellulosic composite, comprising:
applying the adhesive composition of claim 1 to at least one lignocellulosic substrate; and
bonding the adhesive-applied lignocellulosic substrate to at least one other lignocellulosic substrate.
9. A method for making a lignocellulosic composite, comprising:
applying the adhesive composition of claim 3 to at least one lignocellulosic substrate; and
bonding the adhesive-applied lignocellulosic substrate to at least one other lignocellulosic substrate.
10. A method for making a lignocellulosic composite, comprising:
applying the adhesive composition of claim 5 to at least one lignocellulosic substrate; and
bonding the adhesive-applied lignocellulosic substrate to at least one other lignocellulosic substrate.
11. An adhesive composition according to claim 1, wherein the first functional group comprises a phenolic hydroxyl group, and the amino functional group of the compound covalently bonded to the carboxylic acid functional group of the soy protein forms an amide linking group.
12. An adhesive composition according to claim 1, wherein the first functional group comprises a thiol group, and the amino functional group of the compound covalently bonded to the carboxylic acid functional group of the soy protein forms an amide linking group.
13. An adhesive composition according to claim 11, wherein the compound is selected from dopamine, tyramine, DOPA, 2-aminophenol, 3-aminophenol, or 4-aminophenol.
14. An adhesive composition according to claim 12, wherein the compound is selected from cysteamine, cysteine, or glutathione.
15. An adhesive composition according to claim 1, comprising an aqueous solution of the reaction product.
16. An adhesive composition according to claim 7, comprising an aqueous solution of the reaction product.
17. An adhesive composition according to claim 1, wherein the first functional group is initially blocked with a protective group, the resulting protected compound is reacted with the soy protein, and then the protective group is removed from the resulting modified soy protein to produce the reaction product.
18. A method for making a lignocellulosic composite, comprising:
applying the adhesive composition of claim 7 to at least one lignocellulosic substrate; and
bonding the adhesive-applied lignocellulosic substrate to at least one other lignocellulosic substrate.
19. An adhesive composition comprising a reaction product of soy protein and at least one compound, wherein the compound includes (i) at least one first functional group selected from phenolic hydroxyl, thiol, amino, or imino, and (ii) at least one second functional group for covalently bonding the compound to the soy protein.
20. An adhesive composition according to claim 19, wherein the second functional group comprises at least one group selected from hydroxyl, carboxyl, or amino.
21. A method for making an adhesive composition from a soy protein comprising:
contacting a soy protein with at least one compound that includes (i) at least one first functional group selected from phenolic hydroxyl, thiol, amino, or imino, and (ii) at least one second functional group; and
reacting the soy protein and the compound under conditions sufficient for covalently bonding the second functional group of the compound to the soy protein such that the soy protein structure is modified to include the first functional group from the compound.
22. A method according to claim 21, wherein the second functional group comprises at least one group selected from hydroxyl, carboxyl, or amino.
23. A method for making a lignocellulosic composite, comprising:
applying the adhesive composition of claim 20 to at least one lignocellulosic substrate; and
bonding the adhesive-applied lignocellulosic substrate to at least one other lignocellulosic substrate.
24. An adhesive composition according to claim 7, wherein the reaction product incorporates about 0.1 weight percent to about 30 weight percent of a phenolic hydroxyl compound, an amine compound, an imine compound, or a thiol compound.
25. An adhesive composition according to claim 19, wherein the reaction product incorporates about 0.1 weight percent to about 30 weight percent of a phenolic hydroxyl compound, an amine compound, an imine compound, or a thiol compound.
26. A method according to claim 21, further comprising:
prior to contacting the soy protein with the compound, blocking the first functional group of the compound with a protective group,
reacting the protected compound with the soy protein resulting in the modified soy protein; and then
removing the protective group from the modified soy protein.
27. An adhesive composition according to claim 19, wherein the first functional group comprises phenolic hydroxyl and the compound is selected from dopamine, tyramine, DOPA, 2-aminophenol, 3-aminophenol, or 4-aminophenol.
28. An adhesive composition according to claim 19, wherein the first functional group comprises thiol and the compound is selected from cysteamine, cysteine, glutathione, a five-membered dithiocarbonate, γ-thiobutyrolactone, mercaptoacetic acid, 2-mercaptoethanol, 3-mercaptopropionic acid, or (3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane.
29. An adhesive composition according to claim 19, wherein the first functional group comprises amino and the compound is selected from an alkyl amine, an unsaturated hydrocarbon amine, a hydroxy amine, an amidine, an imine, an amino acid, a polyamine, or a polyamide.
30. An adhesive composition according to claim 7, wherein the additional functional group comprises an amino group.
31. An adhesive composition according to claim 19, wherein the first functional group comprises an amino group.
32. An adhesive composition according to claim 1, wherein the soy protein is provided in the form of a soy protein product.
33. An adhesive composition according to claim 7, wherein the soy protein is provided in the form of a soy protein product.
34. An adhesive composition according to claim 32, wherein the soy protein product is selected from soy flour, soy protein concentrate, or soy protein isolate.
35. An adhesive composition according to claim 33, wherein the soy protein product is selected from soy flour, soy protein concentrate, or soy protein isolate.
36. An adhesive composition according to claim 34, wherein the soy protein product is soy flour.
37. An adhesive composition according to claim 35, wherein the soy protein product is soy flour.
38. A method of making a lignocellulosic composite according to claim 8, wherein the soy protein is provided in the form of a soy protein product.
39. A method for making a lignocellulosic composite according to claim 38, wherein the soy protein product is selected from soy flour, soy protein concentrate, or soy protein isolate.
40. A method for making a lignocellulosic composite according to claim 39, wherein the soy protein product is soy flour.
41. A method of making an adhesive composition according to claim 21, wherein the soy protein is provided in the form of a soy protein product.
42. A method for making an adhesive composition according to claim 41, wherein the soy protein product is selected from soy flour, soy protein concentrate, or soy protein isolate.
43. A method for making an adhesive composition according to claim 42, wherein the soy protein product is soy flour.
Patent Citations (34)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2882250(A) | 1959-04-01 | Baker | Applicant |
| US2926116(A) | 1960-02-01 | Keim | Applicant |
| US2926154(A) | 1960-02-01 | Keim | Applicant |
| US3207613(A) | 1965-09-01 | Merrill | Applicant |
| US3274042(A) | 1966-09-01 | Gilboe et al. | Applicant |
| US3285801(A) | 1966-11-01 | Sarjeant et al. | Applicant |
| US3395033(A) | 1968-07-01 | Remer | Applicant |
| US3494775(A) | 1970-02-01 | Coscia et al. | Applicant |
| US3634399(A) | 1972-01-01 | Coscia et al. | Applicant |
| US4382136(A) | 1983-05-01 | Blount | Applicant |
| US4675351(A) | 1987-06-01 | Brown | Applicant |
| US5039426(A) | 1991-08-01 | Giddings | Applicant |
| US5133844(A) | 1992-07-01 | Stevens | Applicant |
| US5344535(A) | 1994-09-01 | Betts et al. | Applicant |
| US5374670(A) | 1994-12-01 | Ayorinde et al. | Applicant |
| US6030562(A) | 2000-02-01 | Lehtinen et al. | Applicant |
| US6124032(A) | 2000-09-01 | Bloch | Applicant |
| US6277481(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Sugino | Applicant |
| US6306997(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Kuo et al. | Applicant |
| US6339116(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Afzali-Ardakani et al. | Applicant |
| US6368529(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Lloyd | Applicant |
| US6406530(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Bengs et al. | Applicant |
| US6716421(B1) | 2004-04-01 | Brode, III et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0005251(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Sun et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0026025(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Kuo et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0089418(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Li | Applicant |
| US2004/0220368(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Li | Applicant |
| US2005/0261404(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Rivers et al. | Applicant |
| DE19843493 | 2000-03-01 | Applicant | |
| EP199171(A2) | 1986-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EP969056(A1) | 2000-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO97/27933 | 1997-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO98/09161 | 1998-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/08110 | 2000-02-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (30)
- Yu et al., Macromolecules 31:4739-4745, 1998.Applicant
- Yu et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121:5825-5826, 1999.Applicant
- DuPont Protein Technologies, Soy Protein Forms, http://www.proteintechnologies.com/corp—eng.nsh/pages/Soy-3, 2002.Applicant
- Georgia-Pacific Chemical Products, Wet and Dry Strength Resins, http://www.gp.com/chemical/products.asp, 2002.Applicant
- Hercules Incorporated, Material Safety Data Sheet, http://msds.plaza.herc.com/msds/00223300.html.Applicant
- Hercules Incorporated, Kymene 557H Wet-Strength Resin Product Data Sheet, 1999.Applicant
- PCT/US2004/012307 International Search Report (mailed Dec. 29, 2004).Applicant
- Li et al., Advances in Biodegredation and Biotransformation of Lignocellulosics, The 225th ACS National Meeting, New Orleans, LA, Mar. 24, 2003.Applicant
- Li et al., Composites from Renewable Resources, The 225th ACS National Meeting, New Orleans, LA, Mar. 26, 2003.Applicant
- Liu et al., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 23(13): 739-742, 2002.Applicant
- Becker et al., “Separation of human breast cancer cells from blood by differential dielectric affinity,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.,92:860-864, 1995.Applicant
- Becker et al., “The removal of human leukaemia cells from blood using interdigitated microelectrodes,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 27:2659-2662, 1994.Applicant
- Davis and Giddings, “Feasibility study of dielectrical field-flow fractionation,” Separation Science and Technology, 21(9):969-989, 1986.Applicant
- Davis and Giddings, “Feasibility study of dielectrical logical studies,” Electrochemical Society Proceeding, 98-14:54-61, 1998.Applicant
- Gascoyne et al., “Use of dielectrophoretic collection spectra for characterizing differences between normal and cancerous cells,” IEEE. Trans. Ind. Appl., 30:829-834, 1994.Applicant
- Gascoyne et al., “Cell separation by conventional dielectrophoresis combined with field-flow fractionation,” Biophys. J., 70:A330, 1996.Applicant
- Gascoyne et al., “Dielectrophoretic separation of cancer cells from blood,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. Soc., 33:670-678, 1997.Applicant
- Gascoyne et al., “Dielectrophoretic separation of mammalian cells studied by computerized image analysis,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 3:439-445, 1992.Applicant
- Giddings, “Field-flow fractionation: analysis of macromolecular, collaidal, and particulate materials,” Science, 260:1456-1465, 1993.Applicant
- Huang et al., “Differences in the ac electrodynamics of viable and non-viable yeast cells determined through combined dielectrophoresis and electrorotation studies,” Phys. Med. Biol., 37:1499-1517, 1992.Applicant
- Huang et al., “Introducing dielectrophoresis as a new force field for field-flow fractionation,” Biophys. J., 73:1118-1129, 1997.Applicant
- Huang et al., “Membrane changes associated with the temperature-sensitive P85gag-mos- dependent transformation of rat kidney cells as determined by dielectrophoresis and electrorotation,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1282, 76-84, 1996.Applicant
- Huang et al., “Membrane dielectric responses of human T-lymphocytes following mitogenic stimulation,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1417:51-62, 1999.Applicant
- Ratanathanawongs and Giddings, “Dual-field and flow-programmed lift hyperlayer field-flow fractionation,” Anal. Chem., 64:6-15, 1992.Applicant
- Stephens et al., “The dielectrophoresis enrichment of CD34+ cells from peripheral blood stem cell harvests,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, 18(4):777-784, 1996.Applicant
- Wang et al., “A theoretical method of electrical field analysis for dielectrophoretic electrode arrays using Green's theorem,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 29:1649-1660, 1996.Applicant
- Wang et al., “Changes in friend murine erythroleukaemia cell membranes during induced differentiation determined by electrorotation,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1193:330-334, 1994.Applicant
- Wang et al., “Dielectrophoretic manipulation of particles,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 33:660-669, 1997.Applicant
- Wang et al., “Non-uniform spatial distributions of both the magnitude and phase of ac electric fields determine dielectrophoretic forces,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1243:185-194, 1995.Applicant
- Wang et al., “Selective dielectrophoretic confinement of bioparticles in potential energy wells,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 26:1278-1285, 1993.Applicant