Ophthalmic device and method of manufacture and use

Patent Citations (40)

Non-Patent Literature (99)

• Daniele et al., “Gelatin as an Absorbable Implant in Scleral Buckling Procedures,” Arch Ophthal, 80:115-119 (1968).Applicant
• Hashizoe et al., “Biodegradable Polymeric Device for Sustained Intravitreal Release of Ganciclovir in Rabbits,” Current Eye Research, 112(10):633-639 (1997).Applicant
• Mathews, “Scleral Expansion Surgery Does Not Restore Accommodation in Human Presbyopia” Opthalmology, 106(5) 873-877 (1999).Applicant
• Mathews, “Scleral Expansion Surgery Does Not Restore Accommodation in Human Presbyopia” Opthalmology 1999; 106:873-877(1999), J. Refractive Surgery, Abstracts With Comments by Elander, 15 (1999).Applicant
• Schachar et al., “In Vivo Increase of the Human Lens Equatorial Diameter During Accommodation,” American Journal of Physiology R670-R676 (1996).Applicant
• Yang et al., “Scleral Expansion: A New Surgical Technique To Correct Presbyopia,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Abstract 38(4) 2290 (1997).Applicant
• Schachar, “Cause and Treatment of presbyopia With a Method for Increasing the Amplitude of Accommodation,” Ann Ophthalmol 24:445-452 (1992).Applicant
• Schachar et al., “Mathematic Proof of Schachar's Hypothesis of Accommodation,” Ann Ophthalmol 25:5-9 (1993).Applicant
• Schachar et al., “Experimental Support for Schachar's Hypothesis of Accommodation,” Ann Ophthalmol 25:404-409 (1993).Applicant
• Schachar et al., “A Physical Model Demonstarting Schachar's Hypothesis of Accommodation,” Ann Ophthalmol 26:4-9 (1994).Applicant
• Schachar, “Zonular Function: A New Hypothesis With Clinical Implications,” Ann Ophthalmol 26:36-38 (1994).Applicant
• Schachar et al., “The Effect of Gravity on the Amplitude of Accommodation,” Ann Ophthalmol 26:65-70 (1994).Applicant
• Schachar et al., “The Mechanism of Accommodation and Presbyopia in the Primate,” Ann Ophthalmol 27:58-67 (1995).Applicant
• Schachar et al., “The Mechanism of Ciliary Muscle Function,” Ann Ophthalmol 27:126-132 (1995).Applicant
• Schachar, “Histology of the Ciliary Muscle-Zonular Connections,” Ann Ophthalmol 28:70-79 (1996).Applicant
• Schachar et al., “Equatorial Diameter During Accommodation,” American Physiological Society R670-R676 (1996).Applicant
• Yee et al., “Scleral Expansion: New Surgical Technique To Correct Presbyopia,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol.30(4), 5 (1997).Applicant
• Glasser et al., “Presbyopia and the Optical Changes in the Human Cyrstalline Lens with Age,” Vision Res., 38:209-229 (1998).Applicant
• Schachar, “Pathophysiology of Accommodation and Presbyopia,” J. Florida M.A. 81:268-271 (1994).Applicant
• Schachar et al., “A Revolutionary Variable Focus Lens,” Annals of Ophthalmology, 2811-18 (1996).Applicant
• Adler-Grinberg, “Questioning Our Classical Understanding of Accommodation and Presbyopia,” Am. J. Optometry & Physiological Optics, 63(7) 571-580 (1986).Applicant
• Arons, “LASIK and PRK clinical results are hot topics at the RSIG and ISRS meetings,” Ocular Surgery News, http://www.slackline.com/eye/osn/199901a/lasik.asp, Jan. 1, 1999.Applicant
• Atchison, “Accommodation and Presbyopia,” Ophthal Physiol. Opt., 15(4):255-272 (1995).Applicant
• Banuelos et al., “Expandable Silicone Implants for Scleral Buckling,” Arch Ophthalmol., 89:500-502 (1973).Applicant
• Bernatchez et al., “Biocompatibility of a new semisolid bioerodable poly(ortho ester) intended for the ocular delivery of 5-fluorouracil,” J. Biomedical Materials Research, 28:1037-1046 (1994).Applicant
• Billson et al., “Resiting Molteno Implant Tubes,” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, 27:801-803 (1996).Applicant
• Brockhurst. “Dystrop[hic Calcification of Silicone Scleral Buckling Implant Materials,” Am J. Ophthalmol, 115:524-529 (1993).Applicant
• Brouillette et al., “Long-term results of modified trabeculectomy with Supramid implant for neovascular glaucoma,” Can. J. ophthalmol, 22(5):254-256 (1987).Applicant
• Cameron et al., “Clinico-histopathologic Correlation of a Successful Glaucoma Pump-shunt Implant,” Ophthalmology, 95:1189-1194 (1988).Applicant
• Campbell et al., “Fluctuations of Accommodation under Steady Viewing Conditions,” J. Physiol., 145:579-594 (1959).Applicant
• Coleman et al., “Initial Clinical Experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Implant,” Am. J. Ophth, 120:23-31 (1995).Applicant
• Coleman et al., “Clinical Experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant in Eyes with prior or Current Penetrating Keratoplasties,” Am. J. Ophth, 123:54-61 (1997).Applicant
• Colosi et al, “Intrusion of Scleral Implant Associated with Conjunctival Epithelial Ingrowth,” Am.J. Ophthalmol, 83:504-507 (1977).Applicant
• Coltair et al., “Scleral pocket incision applied to insertion of the nut and bolt keratoprosthesis,” J. Cataract Refract Surg, 16:649-651 (1990).Applicant
• Crucea et al, “[Artificial drainage devices in glaucoma]” Oftalmologia, 47(2):5-10 abstract only.Applicant
• Daniele et al. “Gelatin as an Absorbable Implant in Scleral Buckling procedured,” Arch Ophthal, 80:115-119 (1968).Applicant
• Ellis, “Surgical Conquest of presbyopia; Are There Implications for Cataract and Glaucoma” Refractive Surgery, 38-44 (1999).Applicant
• El-Sayyad, “The Use of Releasable Sutures in Molteno Glaucoma Implants to Reduce Postoperative Hypotony,” Ophthalmic Surgery, 22:82-84 (1991).Applicant
• Girard et al., “Scleral fixation of a subluxated posterior chamber intraocular lens,” J Cataract Refract Surg, 14:326-327 (1988).Applicant
• Hashizoe et al, “Implantable biodegradable polymeric device in the treatment of experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy,” Curr Eye Res 14(6):473-477 (1995).Applicant
• Hashizoe et al, “Scleral plug of biodegradable polymers for controlled drug release in the vitreous,” Arch Ophthalmol 112(10):1380-1384 (1994).Applicant
• Hashizoe et al, “Biodegradable polymeric devices for sustained intravitreal release of glanciclovir in rabbits,” Current Eye Research 112(10):633-639 (1997).Applicant
• Hasty et al, “Primate Trabeculectomies with 5-fluorouracil Collagen Implants,” Am J Ophthalmol 109:721-725 (1990).Applicant
• Hilton et al., “The Removal of Scleral Buckles,” Arch Ophthalmol, 96:2061-2063 (1978).Applicant
• Ho et al, “The MAI hydrophilic implant for scleral buckling: a review.” Ophthalmic Surg. (6):511-5 (1984).Applicant
• Jacklin et al, “Gelatin as an Absorbable Implant in Scleral Buckling Procedure,” Arch Ophthalmol, 79:286-289 (1968).Applicant
• Jacob et al., “Synthetic scleral reinforcement materials. II Collagen types in the fibrous capsule,” J. Biomedical Materials Research, 32:181-186 (1966).Applicant
• Krupin et al, “Filtering Valve Implant Surgery for Eyes with Neovascular Glaucoma,” Am J Ophthalmol, 89:338-343 (1980).Applicant
• Krupin et al, “Long-Term Results of Valve Implants in Filtering Surgery Eyes with Neovascular Glaucoma,” Am J Ophthalmol, 95:775-782 (1983).Applicant
• Krupin et al, “A Long Krupin-Denver Valve Implant Attached to a 180° Scleral Explant for Glaucoma Surgery,” Ophthalmol, 95:1174-1180 (1988).Applicant
• Kimura et al., “A new Vitreal Drug Delivery System Using an Implantable Biodegradable Polymeric Device,” Investigative Ophthalmol and Visual Science, 35:2815-2819 (1994).Applicant
• King et al., “Gelatin Implants in Scleral Buckling Procedures,” Arch Ophthalmol, 93:807-811 (1975).Applicant
• Lambert et al., “Wedge Implant Used as an Explant,” Am J Ophthalmol, 101:488-489 (1986).Applicant
• Lamberts et al., “A New Alloplastic Materials for Ophthalmic Surgery,” Ophthalmic Surgery. 9:35-42 (1978).Applicant
• Law et al., “Retinal Complications after Aqueous Shunt Surgical Procedures for Glaucoma,” Arch Ophthalmol, 114:1473-1480 (1996).Applicant
• Levit et al., “Use of Ophthalmic Gelfilm in retinal Surgery,” Ann Ophthalmol, 1613-1616 (Dec. 1975).Applicant
• Lipner, “A Closer Look at Scleral Surgery,” Eyeworld, (Sep. 13, 1999) http://www.eyeworld.org/sep99/999p34.asp.Applicant
• Lincoff et al., “The Changing Character of the Infected Scleral Implant,” Arch Ophthalmol, 84:421 et seq, (1970) [Partial copy, full text to follow].Applicant
• Liu et al., Scleral Buckling with a Soft Xerogel Implant: II Experiments In Vivo, Ophthalmic Surgery, 10:52-56 (1979).Applicant
• Lloyd et al., “Initial Clinical Experience with Baerveldt Implant in Complicated Glaucomas,” Ophthalmology, 101:650-640 (1994).Applicant
• Luttrull et al., “Pars Plana Implant and Vitrectomy for Treatment of Neovascular Glaucoma,” Retina, 16:379-387 (1995).Applicant
• Luttrull et al., “Initial Experience with Pneumatically Stented baerveldt implant modified for Pars Plana Insertion in Complicated Glaucom” Ophthalmology, 107:143-149 (2000) [Abstract only].Applicant
• Marin et al., “Long-term Complications of the MAI Hydrogel Intrascleral Buckling Implant,” Arch Ophthalmol, 110:86-88 (1992).Applicant
• Mathews et al., Scleral Expansion Surgery Does Not Restore Accommodation in Human Presbyopia, Ophthalmology, 106: 873-877 (1999).Applicant
• Melamed et al., “Molteno Implant Surgery in refractory Glaucoma,” Survey of Ophthalmology, 34:441-448 (1990).Applicant
• Minckler et al., Clinical Experience with the Single-plate Molteno Implant in Complicated Glaucomas, Ophthalmology 95:1181-1188 (1988).Applicant
• Miyamoto et al, “Biodegradable scleral implany for controlled release of flocanazole,” Current Eye Research, 16:930-935 (1997).Applicant
• Ocular Surgery News, “Presbyopia reversible in Pilot Studies,” Jul. 1, 1999; http://www.slackinc.com/eye/osn/199907a/presby.asp.Applicant
• Peiffer et al., “Long-term Comparative Study of the Schochet and Joseph Glaucoma Tube Shunts in Monkeys,” Ophthalmic Surgery, 21:55-59 (1990).Applicant
• Pruett, “The Fishmouth Phenomenon,” Arch Ophthalmol, 95:1777-181 (1977).Applicant
• Rabowsky et al., “The Use of bioerodeable polymers and daunarubicin in glaucoma filtration surgery,” Ophthalmology, 103:800-807 (1996).Applicant
• Ray et al., “Gelatin Implants in Scleral Buckling Procedures,” Arch Ophthalmol, 93:799-802 (1975).Applicant
• Refojo, “Polymers in Ophthalmic Surgery,” J.Biomed.Mater.Res., 5:113-119 (1971).Applicant
• Refojo et al., “Experimental Scleral Buckling with a Soft Xerogel Implant,” Ophthalmic Surgery, 9:43-50 (1978).Applicant
• Riggs et al., “Intraocular silicone prostheses in a dog and a horse with corneal lacerations,” J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 196:617-619 (1990).Applicant
• Rohr et al., “Surgical Correction f Presbyopia,” J. Osteopathic College of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, 12:34-36 (2000).Applicant
• Rubsamen et al., “Prevention of Experimental Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy with a Biodegradable Intravitreal Implant for the Sustained Release of Fluoroacil,” Arch Ophthalmol, 112:407-413 (1994).Applicant
• Sakamoto et al., “Silicone Sponge Implant in Combination with Episcleral Implant for Retinal Surgery,” Ophthalmic Surgery, 11:712-718 (1980).Applicant
• Sarkies et al., “Silicone Tube and Gutter in Advanced Glaucoma,” Trans. ophthalmol. Soc. U.K., 144:133-136 (1985).Applicant
• Schepens et al., “Scleral Implants: An Historic Perspective,” Survey of Ophthalmology, 35:447-453 (1991).Applicant
• Sherwood et al., “Prevention of early hypotony associated with Molteno implant new occluding stent technique,” Ophthalmology, 100:85-90 (1993).Applicant
• Sherwood et al., “Surgery for Refractory Glaucoma,” Arch Ophthalmol, 105:562-569 (1987).Applicant
• Sidoti et al., “Epithelial Ingrowth and Glaucoma Drainage Implants,” Ophthalmol, 101:872-875 (1994).Applicant
• Sidoti et al., “Aqueous Tube Shunt to a Pre-existing Episcleral Encircling Element in the Treatment of Complicated Glaucomas,” Ophthalmol, 101:1036-1043 (1994).Applicant
• Smith et al., “One-year results of the intrascleral glaucoma implant,” J Cataract Refract Surg, 21:453-456 (1995).Applicant
• Smith et al., “Comparison of the Double-Plate Molteno Drainage Implant with the Schochet Procedure,” Arch Ophthalmol, 110:1246-1250 (1992).Applicant
• Speigel et al., “Anterior Chamber Tube Shunt to an Encircling Band (Schochet procedure) in the Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma,” Ophthalmic Surgery, 12:804-807 (1992).Applicant
• Strubble et al. “In vitro low characteristics of the Amhed and self-constructed anterior chamber shunts,” Am.J.Vet.Res 58:1332-1337 (1997).Applicant
• Sveinsson et al., “Trabeulectomy and gelatin implants,” Acta Ophthalmologica, 70:645-650 (1992).Applicant
• Susanna, “Modifications of the Molteno Implants and implant Procedure,” Ophthalmic Surgery, 22:611-613 (1991).Applicant
• Szyma{grave over (n)}ski, “Scleral free auto-implant plug with mitomycin as limitation of trepanosclerectomy flow in glaucoma filtering surgery,” International Ophthalmology, 20:89-94 (1997).Applicant
• Tanji et al., Fascia Lata Patch Graft in Glaucoma Tube Surgery, Ophthalmology, 103:1309-1312 (1996).Applicant
• Tawakol et al., “Gore-Tex™ Soft Tissue Bands as Scleral Explants in Rabbits: A Preliminary Histologic Study,” Ophthalmic Surgery, 20:199-201 (1989).Applicant
• Watzke, “Scleral Patch Graft for Exposed Episcleral Implants,” Arch Ophthalmol, 102:114-115 (1984).Applicant
• Wilson, “New hope for presbyopia: PMMA scleral bands show promise,” Eyeworld, (1999) http://www.;eyeworld.org/apr98/963.html.Applicant
• Wilson et al., “Aqueous Shunts—Molteni versus Schocket,” Ophthalmology, 99:672-678 (1992).Applicant
• Wilson-Holt et al.,“Hypertrophy floowing insertion of inferiorly sited double-plate Molteno tubes,” Eye, (Pt 5)515-20 (1992) [Abstract only].Applicant
• Yoshizumi, “Exposure of Intrascleral Implants.” Ophthalmology, 87:1150-1154 (1980).Applicant
• Yoshizumi, “Erosion of Implants in Retinal Detachment Surgery” Annals of Ophthalmology, 87:430-434 (1983).Applicant