US 6,980,282 B2Grant
Method for modulating shapes of substrates
Issue Date:2005-12-27
•24 Claims
•9 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
The present invention is directed to a method for modulating shapes of a substrate, having first and second opposed surfaces. This is achieved by creating a pressure differential between differing regions of the first opposed surface to attenuate structural distortions in the second opposed surface that results from external forces bearing on the substrate.
Metadata
Assignee
- Molecular Imprints, Inc.
Inventors
- Byung J. Choi
- Ronald D. Voisin
- Sidlgata V. Sreenivasan
- Michael P. C. Watts
- C. Grant Willson
- Norman E. Schumaker
- Mario J. Meissl
Application Information
Application Number:US 10/316,963
Filing Date:2002-12-11
Priority Date:2002-12-11
Art Unit:2851
Patent Drawings (9 sheets)
Description
[0001] The field of invention relates generally to imprint lithography. More particularly, the present invention is directed to reducing pattern distortions during imprint lithography processes.
[0002] Micro-fabrication involves the fabrication of very small structures, e.g., having features on the order of micro-meters or smaller. One area in which micro-fabrication has had a sizeable impact is in the processing of integrated circuits. As the semiconductor processing industry continues to strive for larger production yields while increasing the circuits per unit area formed on a substrate, micro-fabrication becomes increasingly important. Micro-fabrication provides greater process control while allowing increased reduction of the minimum feature dimension of the structures formed. Other areas of development in which micro-fabrication has been employed include biotechnology, optical technology, mechanical systems and the like.
[0003] An exemplary micro-fabrication technique is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,334,960 to Willson et al. Willson et al. disclose a method of forming a relief image in a structure. The method includes providing a substrate having a transfer layer. The transfer layer is covered with a polymerizable fluid composition. A mold makes mechanical contact with the polymerizable fluid. The mold includes a relief structure, and the polymerizable fluid composition fills the relief structure. The polymerizable fluid composition is then subjected to conditions to solidify and polymerize the same, forming a solidified polymeric material on the transfer layer that contains a relief structure complimentary to that of the mold. The mold is then separated from the solid polymeric material such that a replica of the relief structure in the mold is formed in the solidified polymeric material. The transfer layer and the solidified polymeric material are subjected to an environment to selectively etch the transfer layer relative to the solidified polymeric material such that a relief image is formed in the transfer layer. The time required and the minimum feature dimension provided by this technique is dependent upon, inter alia, the composition of the polymerizable material.
[0004] U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,905 to Chou discloses a lithographic method and apparatus for creating ultra-fine (sub-36 nm) patterns in a thin film coated on a substrate in which a mold having at least one protruding feature is pressed into a thin film carried on a substrate. The protruding feature in the mold creates a recess of the thin film. The mold is removed from the film. The thin film then is processed such that the thin film in the recess is removed exposing the underlying substrate. Thus, patterns in the mold are replaced in the thin film, completing the lithography. The patterns in the thin film will be, in subsequent processes, reproduced in the substrate or in another material which is added onto the substrate.
[0005] Yet another imprint lithography technique is disclosed by Chou et al. in Ultrafast and Direct Imprint of Nanostructures in Silicon, Nature, Col. 417, pp. 835-837, June 2002, which is referred to as a laser assisted direct imprinting (LADI) process. In this process a region of a substrate is made flowable, e.g., liquefied, by heating the region with the laser. After the region has reached a desired viscosity, a mold, having a pattern thereon, is placed in contact with the region. The flowable region conforms to the profile of the pattern and is then cooled, solidifying the pattern into the substrate. An important consideration when forming patterns in this manner is to maintain control of the mold. In this fashion, distortions in the pattern resulting from, inter alia, undesired movement of the mold may be avoided.
[0006] It is desired, therefore, to provide improved techniques for shaping and holding the mold so as to accurately dispose a pattern upon a wafer.
Summary of the Invention
[0007] The present invention is directed to a method for modulating shapes of a substrate, having first and second opposed surfaces, by creating a pressure differential between differing regions of the first opposed surface to attenuate structural distortions in the second opposed surface. To that end, a chuck body is provided that has first and second opposed sides, with an edge surface extending therebetween. The first side includes first and second spaced-apart recesses, defining first and second spaced-apart support regions. The substrate rests against the first and second support regions, covering the first and second recesses. The first recess and the portion of the substrate in superimposition therewith define a first chamber. The second recess and the portion of the substrate in superimposition therewith define a second chamber. A first pressure level is established within the first chamber, and a second pressure level is established in the second chamber. For example, the first chamber may be evacuated to hold the substrate against the chuck body so that separation of the substrate from the chuck body under force of gravity is prevented. The second chamber is pressurized to reduce distortions in a portion of the second side in superimposition therewith. In this manner, hydrostatic pressurization is employed to hold the substrate against the chuck and to compensate for external forces applied to the substrate so as to prevent structural distortions in the substrate. These and other embodiments of the present invention are discussed more fully below.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0008] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a lithographic system in accordance with the present invention;
[0009] FIG. 2 is a simplified elevation view of a lithographic system shown in FIG. 1 ;
[0010] FIG. 3 is a simplified representation of material from which an imprinting layer, shown in FIG. 2 , is comprised before being polymerized and cross-linked;
[0011] FIG. 4 is a simplified representation of cross-linked polymer material into which the material shown in FIG. 3 is transformed after being subjected to radiation;
[0012] FIG. 5 is a simplified elevation view of a mold spaced-apart from the imprinting layer, shown in FIG. 1 , after patterning of the imprinting layer;
[0013] FIG. 6 is a simplified elevation view of an additional imprinting layer positioned atop of the substrate shown in FIG. 5 , after the pattern in the first imprinting layer is transferred therein;
[0014] FIG. 7 is a detailed perspective view of a print head shown in FIG. 1 ;
[0015] FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of a chucking system in accordance with the present invention;
[0016] FIG. 9 is an exploded view of an imprint head shown in FIG. 7 ;
[0017] FIG. 10 is a bottom-up plan view of a chuck body shown in FIG. 8 ;
[0018] FIG. 11 is a top down view of a wafer, shown in FIGS. 2 , 5 and 6 upon which imprinting layers are disposed;
[0019] FIG. 12 is a detailed view of FIG. 11 showing the position of the mold in one of the imprint regions;
[0020] FIG. 13 is a bottom-up plan view of the chuck body shown in FIG. 8 in accordance with an alternate embodiment; and
[0021] FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of a chuck body shown in FIG. 8 in accordance with a second alternate embodiment.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0022] FIG. 1 depicts a lithographic system 10 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention that includes a pair of spaced-apart bridge supports 12 having a bridge 14 and a stage support 16 extending therebetween. Bridge 14 and stage support 16 are spaced-apart. Coupled to bridge 14 is an imprint head 18, which extends from bridge 14 toward stage support 16. Disposed upon stage support 16 to face imprint head 18 is a motion stage 20. Motion stage 20 is configured to move with respect to stage support 16 along X and Y axes. A radiation source 22 is coupled to system 10 to impinge actinic radiation upon motion stage 20. As shown, radiation source 22 is coupled to bridge 14 and includes a power generator 23 connected to radiation source 22.
[0023] Referring to both FIGS. 1 and 2 , connected to imprint head 18 is a substrate 26 having a mold 28 thereon. Mold 28 includes a plurality of features defined by a plurality of spaced-apart recessions 28a and protrusions 28b, having a step height, h, on the order of nanometers, e.g., 100 nanometers. The plurality of features defines an original pattern that is to be transferred into a wafer 30 positioned on motion stage 20. To that end, imprint head 18 is adapted to move along the Z axis and vary a distance “d” between mold 28 and wafer 30. In this manner, the features on mold 28 may be imprinted into a flowable region of wafer 30, discussed more fully below. Radiation source 22 is located so that mold 28 is positioned between radiation source 22 and wafer 30. As a result, mold 28 is fabricated from material that allows it to be substantially transparent to the radiation produced by radiation source 22.
[0024] Referring to both FIGS. 2 and 3 , a flowable region, such as an imprinting layer 34, is disposed on a portion of surface 32 that presents a substantially planar profile. Flowable region may be formed using any known technique such as a hot embossing process disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,905, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein, or a laser assisted direct imprinting (LADI) process of the type described by Chou et al. in Ultrafast and Direct Imprint of Nanostructures in Silicon, Nature, Col. 417, pp. 835-837, June 2002. In the present embodiment, however, the flowable region consists of imprinting layer 34 being deposited as a plurality of spaced-apart discrete beads 36 of material 36a on wafer 30, discussed more fully below. Imprinting layer 34 is formed from a material 36a that may be selectively polymerized and cross-linked to record the original pattern therein, defining a recorded pattern. Material 36a is shown in FIG. 4 as being cross-linked at points 36b, forming cross-linked polymer material 36c.
[0025] Referring to FIGS. 2 , 3 and 5, the pattern recorded in imprinting layer 34 is produced, in part, by mechanical contact with mold 28. To that end, imprint head 18 reduces the distance “d” to allow imprinting layer 34 to come into mechanical contact with mold 28, spreading beads 36 so as to form imprinting layer 34 with a contiguous formation of material 36a over surface 32. In one embodiment, distance “d” is reduced to allow sub-portions 34a of imprinting layer 34 to ingress into and fill recessions 28a.
[0026] To facilitate filling of recessions 28a, material 36a is provided with the requisite properties to completely fill recessions 28a while covering surface 32 with a contiguous formation of material 36a. In the present embodiment, sub-portions 34b of imprinting layer 34 in superimposition with protrusions 28b remain after the desired, usually minimum distance “d”, has been reached, leaving sub-portions 34a with a thickness t1, and sub-portions 34b with a thickness, t2. Thicknesses “t1” and “t2” may be any thickness desired, dependent upon the application. Typically, t1 is selected so as to be no greater than twice the width u of sub-portions 34a, i.e., t1≦2u, shown more clearly in FIG. 5.
[0027] Referring to FIGS. 2 , 3 and 4, after a desired distance “d” has been reached, radiation source 22 produces actinic radiation that polymerizes and cross-links material 36a, forming cross-linked polymer material 36c. As a result, the composition of imprinting layer 34 transforms from material 36a to material 36c, which is a solid. Specifically, material 36c is solidified to provide side 34c of imprinting layer 34 with a shape conforming to a shape of a surface 28c of mold 28, shown more clearly in FIG. 5. After imprinting layer 34 is transformed to consist of material 36c, shown in FIG. 4 , imprint head 18, shown in FIG. 2 , is moved to increase distance “d” so that mold 28 and imprinting layer 34 are spaced-apart.
[0028] Referring to FIG. 5 , additional processing may be employed to complete the patterning of wafer 30. For example, wafer 30 and imprinting layer 34 may be etched to transfer the pattern of imprinting layer 34 into wafer 30, providing a patterned surface 32a, shown in FIG. 6. To facilitate etching, the material from which imprinting layer 34 is formed may be varied to define a relative etch rate with respect to wafer 30, as desired. The relative etch rate of imprinting layer 34 to wafer 30 may be in a range of about 1.5:1 to about 100:1. Alternatively, or in addition to, imprinting layer 34 may be provided with an etch differential with respect to photo-resist material (not shown) selectively disposed thereon. The photo-resist material (not shown) may be provided to further pattern imprinting layer 34, using known techniques. Any etch process may be employed, dependent upon the etch rate desired and the underlying constituents that form wafer 30 and imprinting layer 34. Exemplary etch processes may include plasma etching, reactive ion etching, chemical wet etching and the like.
[0029] Referring to both FIGS. 1 and 2 , an exemplary radiation source 22 may produce ultraviolet radiation. Other radiation sources may be employed, such as thermal, electromagnetic and the like. The selection of radiation employed to initiate the polymerization of the material in imprinting layer 34 is known to one skilled in the art and typically depends on the specific application which is desired. Furthermore, the plurality of features on mold 28 are shown as recessions 28a extending along a direction parallel to protrusions 28b that provide a cross-section of mold 28 with a shape of a battlement. However, recessions 28a and protrusions 28b may correspond to virtually any feature required to create an integrated circuit and may be as small as a few tenths of nanometers.
[0030] It may be desired to manufacture components of system 10 from materials that are thermally stable, e.g., have a thermal expansion coefficient of less than about 10 ppm/degree Centigrade at about room temperature (e.g. 25 degrees Centigrade). In some embodiments, the material of construction may have a thermal expansion coefficient of less than about 10 ppm/degree Centigrade, or less than 1 ppm/degree Centigrade. To that end, bridge supports 12, bridge 14, and/or stage support 16 may be fabricated from one or more of the following materials: silicon carbide, iron alloys available under the trade name INVAR®, or name SUPER INVAR™, ceramics, including but not limited to ZERODUR® ceramic. Additionally table 24 may be constructed to isolate the remaining components of system 10 from vibrations in the surrounding environment. An exemplary table 24 is available from Newport Corporation of Irvine, Calif.
[0031] Referring to FIGS. 7 and 8 , substrate 26, upon which mold 28 is present, is coupled to imprint head housing 18a via a chucking system 40 that includes chuck body 42. Specifically, substrate 26 includes opposed surfaces 26a and 26b and a periphery surface 26c extending therebetween. Surface 26b faces chuck system 40, and mold 28 extends from surface 26a. To ensure that fluid from beads 36, shown in FIG. 2 , do not spread beyond the area of mold 28, surface 28c, shown in FIG. 8 , of mold 28 is spaced-apart from surface 26a of substrate 26 a distance on the order of microns, e.g., 15 microns. A calibration system 18b is coupled to imprint head housing 18a, and chuck body 42 couples substrate 26 to calibration system 18b vis-à-vis a flexure system 18c. Calibration system 18b facilitates proper orientation alignment between substrate 26 and wafer 30, shown in FIG. 2 , thereby achieving a substantially uniform gap distance, “d”, therebetween.
[0032] Referring to both FIGS. 7 and 9 , calibration system 18b includes a plurality of actuators 19a, 19b and 19c and a base plate 19d. Specifically, actuators 19a, 19b and 19c are connected between housing 18a and base plate 19d. Flexure system 18c includes flexure springs 21a and flexure ring 21b. Flexure ring 21b is coupled between base plate 19d and flexure springs 21a. Motion of actuators 19a, 19b and 19c orientates flexure ring 21b that may allow for a course calibration of flexure springs 21a and, therefore, chuck body 42 and substrate 26. Actuators 19a, 19b and 19c also facilitate translation of flexure ring 21b to the Z-axis. Flexure springs 21a include a plurality of linear springs that facilitate gimbal-like motion in the X-Y plane so that proper orientation alignment may be achieved between wafer 30 and substrate 26, shown in FIG. 2.
[0033] Referring to FIGS. 8 and 10 , chuck body 42 is adapted to retain substrate 26 upon which mold 28 is attached employing vacuum techniques. To that end, chuck body 42 includes first 46 and second 48 opposed sides. A side, or edge, surface 50 extends between first side 46 and second side 48. First side 46 includes a first recess 52 and a second recess 54, spaced-apart from first recess 52, defining first 58 and second 60 spaced-apart support regions. First support region 58 cinctures second support region 60 and the first 52 and second 54 recesses. Second support region 60 cinctures second recess 54. A portion 62 of chuck body 42 in superimposition with second recess 54 is transparent to radiation having a predetermined wavelength, such as the wavelength of the actinic radiation mentioned above. To that end, portion 62 is made from a thin layer of transparent material, such as glass. However, the material from which portion 62 is made may depend upon the wavelength of radiation produced by radiation source 22, shown in FIG. 2. Portion 62 extends from second side 48 and terminates proximate to second recess 54 and should define an area at least as large as an area of mold 28 so that mold 28 is in superimposition therewith. Formed in chuck body 42 are one or more throughways, shown as 64 and 66. One of the throughways, such as throughway 64 places first recess 52 in fluid communication with side surface 50. The remaining throughway, such as throughway 66, places second recess 54 in fluid communication with side surface 50.
[0034] It should be understood that throughway 64 may extend between second side 48 and first recess 52, as well. Similarly, throughway 66 may extend between second side 48 and second recess 54. What is desired is that throughways 64 and 66 facilitate placing recesses 52 and 54, respectively, in fluid communication with a pressure control system, such a pump system 70.
[0035] Pump system 70 may include one or more pumps to control the pressure proximate to recesses 52 and 54, independently of one another. Specifically, when mounted to chuck body 42, substrate 26 rests against first 58 and second 60 support regions, covering first 52 and second 54 recesses. First recess 52 and a portion 44a of substrate 26 in superimposition therewith define a first chamber 52a. Second recess 54 and a portion 44b of substrate 26 in superimposition therewith define a second chamber 54a. Pump system 70 operates to control a pressure in first 52a and second 54a chambers.
[0036] For example, the pressure may be established in first chamber 52a to maintain the position of substrate 26 with chuck body 42 and reduce, if not avoid, separation of substrate 26 from chuck body 42 under force of gravity, g. The pressure in second chamber 54a may differ from the pressure in first chamber 52a to reduce, inter alia, out of surface distortions in the pattern, defined by the features on mold 28, which occur during imprinting. Out of surface distortions may occur, for example, from an upward force R against mold 28 that occurs as a result of imprinting layer 34, shown in FIG. 2 , contacting mold 28. By modulating a shape of substrate 26, shown in FIG. 8 , out of surface distortions in the pattern may be attenuated, if not avoided. For example, pump system 70 may apply a positive pressure in chamber 54a to compensate for force R. This produces a pressure differential between differing regions of side 46 so that bowing of substrate 26 and, therefore, mold 28 under force R is controlled or attenuated to provide substrate 26 and, therefore mold 28, with a desired predetermined shape. Exemplary shapes that substrate 26 and mold 28 may take includes ellipsoidal, arcuate, planar, parabolic, saddle-shape and the like.
[0037] Referring to FIGS. 2 and 8 , imprint head 18 may include a pressure sensor 18d to detect a magnitude of force R to which mold 28 is subjected during an imprinting process. Information is produced by sensor 18d that is transmitted to a processor 71 in data communication therewith. In response to the information obtained from sensor 18d, processor 71 may control pump system 70 to establish the pressure within chambers 52a and 54a to compensate for force R so that substrate 26 and, therefore mold 28, have a desired predetermined shape.
[0038] The pressure in chambers 52a and 54a may be established based upon a priori knowledge of force R from previous imprinting processes that were detected by pressure sensor 18d. As a result, the pressure in chambers 52a and 54a may be established either before or after contact is made between mold 28 and imprinting layer 34 in order to ensure that substrate 26 and, therefore, mold 28, has a desired predetermined shape. In some instances it may be desirable to pressurize chamber 54a on-the-fly, or dynamically, during imprinting process. For example, it may be advantageous to establish the pressure in chamber 54a to properly shape substrate 26, as desired, after mold 28 contacts imprinting layer 34. The positive pressure established in chamber 54a to obtain a desired predetermined shape of substrate 26 and, therefore, mold 28, may be greater than the vacuum pressure established in chamber 52a. This would cause substrate 26 to decouple from chuck body 42.
[0039] To maintain the relative position between chuck body 42 and substrate 26 during imprinting, the pressure in chamber 54a may be established dynamically after mold 28 contacts imprinting layer 34. In this manner, both force R and the vacuum pressure in chamber 52a ensures that the relative position between chuck body 42 and substrate 26 is maintained in the face of a positive pressure in chamber 54a. After mold 28 imprints the pattern in imprinting layer 34, pressure in chamber 54a may be adjusted to establish a vacuum therein. In this manner, all chambers 52a and 54a have a vacuum to facilitate separation of mold 28 from imprinting layer 34, while maintaining the relative position between chuck body 42 and substrate 26.
[0040] Coupled to substrate 26 is a means to compress the same in X and Y directions, with the understanding that the Y-direction is into the plane of FIG. 8. In the present example the means to compress includes a fluid-tight bladder system surrounding periphery surface 26c having one or more bladders, two of which are shown as 72a and 72b that extend along the Y axis, with the understanding that bladders extending along the X axis of periphery surface 26c are not shown for the sake of clarity, but are included in the present embodiment. Other devices capable of compressing substrate 26 may be employed in addition to, or in lieu of, bladder system, such as a vice or piezoelectric actuators that function as a vice. Bladders 72a and 72b are in fluid communication with pump system 70 to control the fluid pressure in bladders 72a and 72b. In this manner, bladders 72a and 72b may be used to apply forces to substrate 26, by loading periphery surface 26c, to vary the dimensions of the same and reduce in-surface distortions in the pattern recorded into imprinting layer 34, shown in FIG. 2.
[0041] In-surface distortions in the pattern recorded into imprinting layer 34 may arise from, inter alia, dimensional variations of imprinting layer 34 and wafer 30. These dimensional variations, which may be due in part to thermal fluctuations, as well as, inaccuracies in previous processing steps that produce what is commonly referred to as magnification/run-out errors. The magnification/run-out errors occur when a region of wafer 30 in which the original pattern is to be recorded exceeds the area of the original pattern. Additionally, magnification/run-out errors may occur when the region of wafer 30, in which the original pattern is to be recorded, has an area smaller than the original pattern. The deleterious effects of magnification/run-out errors are exacerbated when forming multiple layers of imprinted patterns, shown as imprinting layer 124 in superimposition with patterned surface 32a, shown in FIG. 6. Proper alignment between two superimposed patterns is difficult in the face of magnification/run-out errors in both single-step full wafer imprinting and step-and-repeat imprinting processes.
[0042] Referring to FIGS. 11 and 12 , a step-and-repeat process includes defining a plurality of regions, shown as, a-l, on wafer 30 in which the original pattern on mold 28 will be recorded. The original pattern on mold 28 may be coextensive with the entire surface of mold 28, or simply located to a sub-portion thereof, but it should be understood that substrate 26 has an area that is greater than each of regions a-l. Proper execution of a step-and-repeat process may include proper alignment of mold 28 with each of regions a-l. To that end, mold 28 includes alignment marks 114a, shown as a “+” sign. One or more of regions a-l include fiducial marks 110a. By ensuring that alignment marks 114a are properly aligned with fiducial marks 110a, proper alignment of mold 28 with one of regions a-l in superimposition therewith is ensured. To that end, machine vision devices (not shown) may be employed to sense the relative alignment between alignment marks 114a and fiducial marks 110a. In the present example, proper alignment is indicated upon alignment marks 114a being in superimposition with fiducial marks 110a. With the introduction of magnification/run-out errors, proper alignment becomes very difficult.
[0043] However, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, magnification/run-out errors are reduced, if not avoided, by creating relative dimensional variations between mold 28 and wafer 30. Specifically, the temperature of wafer 30 is varied so that one of regions a-l defines an area that is slightly less than an area of the original pattern on mold 28. Thereafter, the final compensation for magnification/run-out errors is achieved by subjecting substrate 26, shown in FIG. 8 , to mechanical compression forces using bladder 72a or 72b, which are in turn transferred to mold 28 shown by arrows F1, and F2, orientated transversely to one another, shown in FIG. 12. In this manner, the area of the original pattern is made coextensive with the area of the region a-l in superimposition therewith.
[0044] Referring to both FIGS. 5 and 8 , subjecting substrate 26 to compressive forces, however, modulates the shape of the same through bending action. Bending of substrate 26 may also introduce distortions in the pattern imprinted into imprinting layer 34. The pattern distortions attributable to bending of substrate 26 may be reduced, if not prevented, by positioning bladders 72a and 72b so that the bending of substrate 26 is controlled to occur in a desired predetermined direction. In the present example, bladders 72a and 72b are positioned to compress substrate 26 so as to bow in a direction parallel to, and opposite of, force R. By controlling the bending of substrate 26 in this manner, chucking system 40 may be employed to counter the bending force, B, so as to ensure that mold 28 remains substantially planar. Pump system 70 may be employed to pressurize chamber 54a appropriately to that end. For example, assuming bending force B is greater than force R, pump system 70 would be employed to evacuate chamber 54a with sufficient vacuum to compensate for bending force B. Were bending force B weaker than force R, pump system 70 would be employed to pressurize chamber 54a appropriately to obtain a desired predetermined shape of substrate 26 and, therefore, mold 28. The exact pressure levels may be determined with a priori knowledge of the forces R and B which then may be analyzed by processor 71 that may be included in pump system 70 to pressurize chambers 52a and 54a to the appropriate levels. Also, the forces R and B may be sensed dynamically using known techniques, such as pressure sensor 18d and processor 71 discussed above, so that the pressure within chambers 52a and 54a may be established dynamically during operation to maintain substrate 26 with a desired shape. The magnitude of the bending is dependent upon many factors, such as the shape of periphery surface 26c, e.g., whether periphery surface 26c extends orthogonally to first and second surface 26a and 26b or forms an oblique angle with respect thereto, as well as the location on periphery surface 26c that bladders 72a and 72b apply a force, as well as the pattern of beads 36 on surface 32, shown in FIG. 2. Means for applying a single compressive force is shown on opposing regions of periphery surface 26c, such as bladders 72a and 72b. It should be understood that multiple compressive forces can be applied to opposing regions of periphery surface 26c, shown as forces F3, F4, F5 and F6. Forces F3, F4, F5 and F6 may have identical or differing magnitudes as required to provide substrate 26 with a desired predetermined shape.
[0045] Referring again to FIG. 8 , when compressing substrate 26 with bladders 72a or 72b, relative movement between substrate 26 and support regions 58 and 60 occurs along the X and Y axes. As a result, it is desired that support regions 58 and 60 have surface regions 58a and 60a, respectively, formed thereon from a material adapted to conform to a profile of substrate 26 and resistant to deformation along the X and Y axes. In this manner, surface regions 58a and 60a resist relative movement of substrate 26 with respect to chuck body 42 in the X and Y directions.
[0046] Referring to FIGS. 8 and 13 , in another embodiment, chuck body 142 may include one or more walls, or baffles, shown as 142a, 142b, 142c and 142d extending between first and second support regions 158 and 160, respectively. In this fashion, walls/baffles 142a, 142b, 142c and 142d segment recess 152 into a plurality of sub-regions 152a, 152b, 152c and 152d that function as sub-chambers once substrate 26 is placed in superimposition therewith. Sub-chambers 152a, 152b, 152c and 152d may be fluid-tight which would result in each having a throughway (not shown) placing the same in fluid communication with pump system 70. Alternatively, or in conjunction therewith, sub-chambers 152a, 152b, 152c and 152d may not form fluid-tight chambers once substrate 26 is placed in superimposition therewith. Rather walls l42a, 142b, 142c and 142d would be spaced-apart from substrate 26 to function as a baffle for fluid transfer across the same. As a result, with the appropriate pressure level being provided by pump system 70 to recess 152, a pressure differential could be provided between sub-chambers 152a, 152b, 152c and 152d, as desired. In a similar fashion one or more baffles, shown as 142e, may be positioned to extend between opposing areas of support region 160 to form sub-chambers 154a and 154b, if desired.
[0047] Referring to both FIGS. 2 and 13 , providing walls/baffles 142a, 142b, 142c and 142d this configuration, sub-chambers 152a, 152b, 152c and 152d may be concurrently provided with differing pressure levels. As a result, the amount of force exerted on substrate 26 when being pulled-apart from imprinting layer 34 may vary across the surface of substrate 26. This allows cantilevering, or peeling-off, of substrate 26 from imprinting layer 34 that reduces distortions or defects from being formed in imprinting layer 34 during separation of substrate 26 therefrom. For example, sub-chamber 152b may have a pressure established therein that is greater than the pressure associated with the remaining sub-chambers 152a, 152c and 152d. As a result, when increasing distance “d” the pulling force of the portion of substrate 26 in superimposition with sub-chambers 152a, 152c and 152d is subjected to is greater than the pulling force to which the portion of substrate 26 in superimposition with sub-chamber 152b is subjected. Thus, the rate that “d” increases for the portion of substrate 26 in superimposition with sub-chambers 152a, 152c and 152d is accelerated compared to the rate at which “d” increases for the portion of substrate 26 in superimposition with sub-chamber 152b, providing the aforementioned cantilevering effect.
[0048] In yet another embodiment, shown in FIG. 14 , chuck body 242 includes a plurality of pins 242a projecting from a nadir surface 252a of out recess 252. Pins 242a provide mechanical support for the substrate (not shown) retained on chuck body 242 via vacuum. This enables support regions 258 and 260 to have surface regions 258a and 260a, respectively, formed from material that is fully compliant with the surface (not shown) of the substrate (not shown) resting against support regions 258 and 260 In this manner, surface regions 258a and 260a provide a fluid-tight seal with the substrate (not shown) in the presence of extreme surface variation, e.g., when particulate matter is present between the surface (not shown) of the substrate (not shown) and the surface regions 258a and 260a. Mechanical support of the substrate (not shown) in the Z-direction need not be provided by surface regions 258a and 260a. Pins 242a provide this support. To that end, pins 242a are typically rigid posts having a circular cross-section.
[0049] The embodiments of the present invention described above are exemplary. Many changes and modifications may be made to the disclosure recited above, while remaining within the scope of the invention. For example, by pressurizing all chambers formed by the chuck body-substrate combination with positive fluid pressure, the substrate may be quickly released from the chuck body. Further, many of the embodiments discussed above may be implemented in existing imprint lithography processes that do not employ formation of an imprinting layer by deposition of beads of polymerizable material. Exemplary processes in which differing embodiments of the present invention may be employed include a hot embossing process disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,905, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. Additionally, many of the embodiments of the present invention may be employed using a laser assisted direct imprinting (LADI) process of the type described by Chou et al. in Ultrafast and Direct Imprint of Nanostructures in Silicon, Nature, Col. 417, pp. 835-837, June 2002. Therefore, the scope of the invention should be determined not with reference to the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
Claims
1. A method for modulating shapes of a substrate, having first and second opposed surfaces, with said second opposed surface facing an imprinting layer, said method comprising:
creating a pressure differential between differing regions of said first opposed surface to obtain a desired shape of said second opposed surface by compensating for external pressures bearing thereon resulting from contact by said second opposed surface with said imprinting layer.
2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein creating further includes subjecting a first subset of said differing regions to a pulling force and subjecting a second subset of said differing regions to a pushing force to establish a sub portion of said second opposed surface to have a desired predetermined shape.
3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein creating further includes subjecting a first subset of said differing regions to a pulling force that is substantially greater than a pulling force associated with the remaining regions of said differing regions, with said first subset being contiguous and positioned proximate to a periphery of said substrate.
4. The method as recited in claim 1 further including applying compressive forces to said substrate to vary dimensions thereof that induce a bending action, with creating further including creating a pulling force to attenuate said bending action and maintain a desired predetermined shape of a portion of said second opposed surface.
5. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein creating further includes establishing a first of said differing regions to cincture a second of said differing regions, with said first region having a pulling force applied thereto and said second region having a pushing force present thereon.
6. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein creating said pressure differential occurs dynamically.
7. The method as recited in claim 1 further including contacting said imprinting layer with said second opposed surface, separating said second opposed surface from said imprinting layer and terminating said pressure differential after separating by creating a positing pressure directed against said first opposed surface.
8. The method as recited in claim 1 further including providing said second opposed surface with a mold having a pattern disposed thereon facing said imprinting layer and contacting said imprinting layer with said mold, wherein creating further includes providing a chuck body having first and second opposed sides with an edge surface extending therebetween, said first opposed side including first and second spaced-apart recesses defining first and second spaced-apart support regions, resting said substrate against said first and second spaced-apart support regions, covering said first and second spaced-apart recesses, with said first recess and a first portion of said substrate in superimposition therewith defining a first chamber and said second recess and a second portion of said substrate in superimposition therewith defining a second chamber, with said pressure differential being created by establishing differing pressure levels within said first and second chambers to retain said substrate on said chuck body, and further including establishing a positive pressure within said second chamber after contacting said imprinting layer with said mold to remove said substrate from said chuck body.
9. The method as recited in claim 8 further including separating said mold from said imprinting layer and evacuating said second chamber before separating said mold from said imprinting layer.
10. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein creating said pressure differential further includes having a differing pressure associated with each of said differing regions.
11. A method for modulating shapes of a substrate, having first and second opposed surfaces with a side surface extending therebetween, said method comprising:
creating a pressure differential between differing regions of said first opposed surface; and
attenuating structural distortions in said second opposed surface by loading said side surface causing said substrate to bow and varying said pressure differential to compensate for external forces bearing on said side surface and said second opposed surface.
12. The method as recited in claim 11 wherein attenuating further includes obtaining information concerning a magnitude of said external forces and adjusting said pressure differential in response to said information to modulate a shape of said second opposed surface to a desired predetermined shape.
13. The method as recited in claim 12 wherein creating further includes providing a chuck body having first and second opposed sides with an edge surface extending therebetween, said first opposed side including first and second spaced-apart recesses defining first and second spaced-apart support regions, resting said substrate against said first and second spaced-apart support regions, covering said first and second spaced-apart recesses, with said first recess and a first portion of said substrate in superimposition therewith defining a first chamber and said second recess and a second portion of said substrate in superimposition therewith defining a second chamber establishing, with said pressure differential being created by establishing differing pressure levels within said first and second chambers.
14. The method as recited in claim 12 further including disposing a wafer opposite said second opposed surface and moving, with said chuck body, said second opposed surface so that a portion thereof, in superimposition with said second chamber, contacts said wafer, resulting in a force being exerted on said portion in a direction toward said second opposed surface, with attenuating further including pressurizing said second chamber with sufficient positive fluid pressure to establish said portion to have a desired predetermined shape.
15. The method as recited in claim 12 further including disposing a wafer opposite said second opposed surface and moving, with said chuck body, said second opposed surface so that a portion thereof, in superimposition with said second chamber, contacts said wafer, resulting in an impact force being exerted on said portion in a direction toward said second opposed surface, and applying compressive forces to said side surface to vary dimensions of said substrate creating a bending force that bends said substrate in a predetermined direction, with attenuating further including determining a relative magnitude difference between said bending force and said impact force and pressurizing said second chamber appropriately to establish said portion to have a desired predetermined shape.
16. The method as recited in claim 11 further including providing said second opposed surface with a mold having a pattern disposed thereon facing an imprinting layer and contacting said imprinting layer with said mold, wherein creating said pressure differential further includes providing a chuck body having first and second opposed sides with an edge surface extending therebetween, said first opposed side including first and second spaced-apart recesses defining first and second spaced-apart support regions, resting said substrate against said first and second spaced-apart support regions, covering said first and second spaced-apart recesses, with said first recess and a first portion of said substrate in superimposition therewith defining a first chamber and said second recess and a second portion of said substrate in superimposition therewith defining a second chamber, with attenuating further including establishing a positive pressure within said second chamber after contacting said imprinting layer with said mold.
17. The method as recited in claim 16 further including disposing a wafer opposite said second opposed surface having said imprinting layer disposed thereon and creating relative movement between said second opposed surface and said wafer so that a portion of said second opposed surface, in superimposition with said second chamber, contacts said imprinting layer, and increasing a distance between said portion and said wafer after contact, with a rate at which said distance changes for differing sub-portions being different and defined by said pressure differential.
18. A method for modulating shapes of a substrate, having first and second opposed surfaces with a side surface extending therebetween, said substrate being spaced-apart from a wafer having an imprinting layer disposed thereon, said method comprising:
defining a plurality of pressure chambers in fluid communication with said first opposed surface by providing a chuck body having first and second opposed sides with an edge surface extending therebetween, said first opposed side including first and second spaced-apart recesses defining first and second spaced-apart support regions, resting said substrate against said first and second spaced-apart support regions, covering said first and second spaced-apart recesses, with said first recess and a first portion of said substrate in superimposition therewith defining a first chamber and said second recess and a second portion of said substrate in superimposition therewith defining a second chamber;
hydrostatically supporting said substrate against gravity by creating a pressure differential between said first and second chambers; and
attenuating structural distortions in said second opposed surface by loading said side surface causing said substrate to bow and varying said pressure of said second chamber to compensate for external forces bearing on said side surface and said second opposed surface.
19. The method as recited in claim 18 wherein attenuating further includes obtaining information concerning a magnitude of said external forces and adjusting said pressure differential in response to said information to modulate a shape of said second opposed surface to a desired predetermined shape.
20. The method as recited in claim 19 further including disposing said wafer opposite said second opposed surface and moving, with said chuck body, said second opposed surface so that a portion thereof, in superimposition with said second chamber, contacts said wafer, resulting in a contact force being exerted on said portion in a direction toward said second opposed surface, with attenuating further including pressurizing said second chamber with sufficient positive fluid pressure to establish said portion to have a desired predetermined shape.
21. The method as recited in claim 20 further including applying compressive forces to said side surface to vary dimensions of said substrate creating a bending force that bends said substrate in a predetermined direction, with attenuating further including determining a relative magnitude difference between said bending force and said contact force and pressurizing said second chamber appropriately to establish said portion to have said desired predetermined shape.
22. The method as recited in claim 21 further including creating a relative movement between said second opposed surface and said wafer so that said portion contacts said imprinting layer, and increasing a distance between said portion and said imprinting layer after contact, with a rate at which said distance changes for differing sub-portions being different and defined by said pressure differential.
23. A method for modulating shapes of a substrate, having first and second opposed surfaces and a side surface extending therebetween, with said second opposed surface having a pattern disposed thereon and facing an imprinting layer, said method comprising:
loading said side surface causing said substrate to bow;
creating a pressure differential between differing regions of said first opposed surface to attenuate distortions in said pattern while maintaining a desired predetermined shape of said second opposed surface.
24. A method for modulating shapes of a substrate, having first and second opposed surfaces with a side surface extending therebetween, said substrate being spaced-apart from a wafer having an imprinting layer disposed thereon, said method comprising:
hydrostatically supporting said substrate against gravity by creating a pressure differential between first and second regions of said first opposed surface; and
attenuating structural distortions in said second opposed surface by dynamically varying said pressure associated with said second region to compensate for varying external pressures bearing on said second opposed surfaces that results from contacting said imprinting layer with said substrate.
Patent Citations (149)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3783520(A) | 1974-01-01 | King | Applicant |
| US4070116(A) | 1978-01-01 | Frosch et al. | Applicant |
| US4119688(A) | 1978-10-01 | Hiraoka | Applicant |
| US4201800(A) | 1980-05-01 | Alcorn et al. | Applicant |
| US4426247(A) | 1984-01-01 | Tamamura et al. | Applicant |
| US4507331(A) | 1985-03-01 | Hiraoka | Applicant |
| US4552833(A) | 1985-11-01 | Ito et al. | Applicant |
| US4600309(A) | 1986-07-01 | Fay | Applicant |
| US4657845(A) | 1987-04-01 | Frechet et al. | Applicant |
| US4692205(A) | 1987-09-01 | Sachdev et al. | Applicant |
| US4707218(A) | 1987-11-01 | Giammarco et al. | Applicant |
| US4724222(A) | 1988-02-01 | Feldman | Applicant |
| US4731155(A) | 1988-03-01 | Napoli et al. | Applicant |
| US4737425(A) | 1988-04-01 | Lin et al. | Applicant |
| US4808511(A) | 1989-02-01 | Holmes | Applicant |
| US4826943(A) | 1989-05-01 | Ito et al. | Applicant |
| US4848911(A) | 1989-07-01 | Uchida et al. | Applicant |
| US4857477(A) | 1989-08-01 | Kanamori | Applicant |
| US4891303(A) | 1990-01-01 | Garza et al. | Applicant |
| US4908298(A) | 1990-03-01 | Hefferon et al. | Applicant |
| US4919748(A) | 1990-04-01 | Bredbenner et al. | Applicant |
| US4921778(A) | 1990-05-01 | Thackeray et al. | Applicant |
| US4931351(A) | 1990-06-01 | McColgin et al. | Applicant |
| US4964945(A) | 1990-10-01 | Calhoun | Applicant |
| US4976818(A) | 1990-12-01 | Hashimoto et al. | Applicant |
| US4980316(A) | 1990-12-01 | Huebner | Applicant |
| US4999280(A) | 1991-03-01 | Hiraoka | Applicant |
| US5053318(A) | 1991-10-01 | Gulla et al. | Applicant |
| US5071694(A) | 1991-12-01 | Uekita et al. | Applicant |
| US5074667(A) | 1991-12-01 | Miyatake | Applicant |
| US5108875(A) | 1992-04-01 | Thackeray et al. | Applicant |
| US5148036(A) | 1992-09-01 | Matsugu et al. | Applicant |
| US5148037(A) | 1992-09-01 | Suda et al. | Applicant |
| US5151754(A) | 1992-09-01 | Ishibashi et al. | Applicant |
| US5169494(A) | 1992-12-01 | Hashimoto et al. | Applicant |
| US5173393(A) | 1992-12-01 | Sezi et al. | Applicant |
| US5179863(A) | 1993-01-01 | Uchida et al. | Applicant |
| US5198326(A) | 1993-03-01 | Hashimoto et al. | Applicant |
| US5212147(A) | 1993-05-01 | Sheats | Applicant |
| US5234793(A) | 1993-08-01 | Sebald et al. | Applicant |
| US5240878(A) | 1993-08-01 | Fitzsimmons et al. | Applicant |
| US5242711(A) | 1993-09-01 | DeNatale et al. | Applicant |
| US5244818(A) | 1993-09-01 | Jokerst et al. | Applicant |
| US5314772(A) | 1994-05-01 | Kozicki et al. | Applicant |
| US5318870(A) | 1994-06-01 | Hartney | Applicant |
| US5324683(A) | 1994-06-01 | Fitch et al. | Applicant |
| US5328810(A) | 1994-07-01 | Lowrey et al. | Applicant |
| US5330881(A) | 1994-07-01 | Sidman et al. | Applicant |
| US5362606(A) | 1994-11-01 | Hartney et al. | Applicant |
| US5366851(A) | 1994-11-01 | Novembre | Applicant |
| US5374454(A) | 1994-12-01 | Bickford et al. | Applicant |
| US5376810(A) | 1994-12-01 | Hoenk et al. | Applicant |
| US5380474(A) | 1995-01-01 | Rye et al. | Applicant |
| US5417802(A) | 1995-05-01 | Obeng | Applicant |
| US5421981(A) | 1995-06-01 | Leader et al. | Applicant |
| US5422295(A) | 1995-06-01 | Choi et al. | Applicant |
| US5424549(A) | 1995-06-01 | Feldman | Applicant |
| US5425848(A) | 1995-06-01 | Haisma et al. | Applicant |
| US5431777(A) | 1995-07-01 | Austin et al. | Applicant |
| US5439766(A) | 1995-08-01 | Day et al. | Applicant |
| US5453157(A) | 1995-09-01 | Jeng | Applicant |
| US5458520(A) | 1995-10-01 | DeMercurio et al. | Applicant |
| US5468542(A) | 1995-11-01 | Crouch | Applicant |
| US5515167(A) | 1996-05-01 | Ledger et al. | Applicant |
| US5527662(A) | 1996-06-01 | Hashimoto et al. | Applicant |
| US5563684(A) | 1996-10-01 | Stagaman | Applicant |
| US5654238(A) | 1997-08-01 | Cronin et al. | Applicant |
| US5669303(A) | 1997-09-01 | Maracas et al. | Applicant |
| US5670415(A) | 1997-09-01 | Rust | Applicant |
| US5700626(A) | 1997-12-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US5736424(A) | 1998-04-01 | Prybyla et al. | Applicant |
| US5737064(A) | 1998-04-01 | Inoue et al. | Examiner |
| US5743998(A) | 1998-04-01 | Park | Applicant |
| US5772905(A) | 1998-06-01 | Chou | Applicant |
| US5855686(A) | 1999-01-01 | Rust | Applicant |
| US5895263(A) | 1999-04-01 | Carter et al. | Applicant |
| US5900160(A) | 1999-05-01 | Whitesides et al. | Applicant |
| US5907782(A) | 1999-05-01 | Wu | Applicant |
| US5926690(A) | 1999-07-01 | Toprac et al. | Applicant |
| US5948219(A) | 1999-09-01 | Rohner | Applicant |
| US5948470(A) | 1999-09-01 | Harrison et al. | Applicant |
| US5948570(A) | 1999-09-01 | Kornblit et al. | Applicant |
| US6019166(A) | 2000-02-01 | Viswanath et al. | Applicant |
| US6033977(A) | 2000-03-01 | Gutsche et al. | Applicant |
| US6035805(A) | 2000-03-01 | Rust | Applicant |
| US6039897(A) | 2000-03-01 | Lochhead et al. | Applicant |
| US6096655(A) | 2000-08-01 | Lee et al. | Applicant |
| US6137562(A) | 2000-10-01 | Masuyuki et al. | Examiner |
| US6150231(A) | 2000-11-01 | Muller et al. | Applicant |
| US6150680(A) | 2000-11-01 | Eastman et al. | Applicant |
| US6245581(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Bonser et al. | Applicant |
| US6274294(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Hines | Applicant |
| US6309580(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Chou | Applicant |
| US6326627(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Putvinski et al. | Applicant |
| US6329256(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Ibok | Applicant |
| US6334960(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Willson et al. | Applicant |
| US6383928(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Eissa | Applicant |
| US6387783(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Furukawa et al. | Applicant |
| US6388253(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Su | Applicant |
| US6391798(B1) | 2002-05-01 | DeFelice et al. | Applicant |
| US6455411(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Jiang et al. | Applicant |
| US6482742(B1) | 2002-11-01 | Chou | Applicant |
| US6489068(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Kye | Applicant |
| US6514672(B2) | 2003-02-01 | Young et al. | Applicant |
| US6518168(B1) | 2003-02-01 | Clem et al. | Applicant |
| US6534418(B1) | 2003-03-01 | Plat et al. | Applicant |
| US6541360(B1) | 2003-04-01 | Plat et al. | Applicant |
| US6561706(B2) | 2003-05-01 | Singh et al. | Applicant |
| US6565928(B2) | 2003-05-01 | Sakamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US6632742(B2) | 2003-10-01 | Yang et al. | Applicant |
| US6635581(B2) | 2003-10-01 | Wong | Applicant |
| US6646662(B1) | 2003-11-01 | Nebashi et al. | Applicant |
| US6677252(B2) | 2004-01-01 | Marsh | Applicant |
| US6696220(B2) | 2004-02-01 | Bailey et al. | Applicant |
| US6703190(B2) | 2004-03-01 | Elian et al. | Applicant |
| US6716767(B2) | 2004-04-01 | Shih et al. | Applicant |
| US6730256(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Bloomstein et al. | Applicant |
| US6737202(B2) | 2004-05-01 | Gehoski et al. | Applicant |
| US6743713(B2) | 2004-06-01 | Mukherjee-Roy et al. | Applicant |
| US6767983(B1) | 2004-07-01 | Fujiyama et al. | Applicant |
| US6770852(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Steger | Applicant |
| US6776094(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Whitesides et al. | Applicant |
| US6777170(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Bloomstein et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0093122(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Choi et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0094496(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Choi et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0098426(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Sreenivasan et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0132482(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Chou | Applicant |
| US2002/0167117(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Chou | Applicant |
| US2003/0080471(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Chou | Applicant |
| US2003/0081193(A1) | 2003-05-01 | White et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0092261(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Kondo et al. | Examiner |
| US2003/0113638(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Mancini et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0129542(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Shih et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0179354(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Araki et al. | Examiner |
| US2004/0029041(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Shih et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0036201(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Chou et al. | Applicant |
| DE28004786 | 1978-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP55-88332 | 1978-12-01 | Applicant | |
| JP57-7931 | 1980-06-01 | Applicant | |
| JP63-138730 | 1986-12-01 | Applicant | |
| JP1-196749 | 1989-08-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2-24848 | 1990-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2-92603 | 1990-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/21689 | 2000-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/47003(A2) | 2001-06-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/69317 | 2001-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/79592 | 2001-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/79933 | 2001-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/90816 | 2001-11-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (52)
- Krauss et al., “Fabrication of Nanodevices Using Sub-25nm Imprint Lithography,” Appl. Phys. Lett 67(21), 3114-3116, 1995.Applicant
- Chou et al., “Imprint of Sub-25 nm Vias and Trenches in Polymers,” Applied Physics Letters, Nov. 20, 1995, pp. 3114-3116, vol. 67(21).Applicant
- Chou et al., “Imprint Lithography with 25-Nanometer Resolution,” Science, Apr. 5, 1996, pp. 85-87, vol. 272.Applicant
- Haisma et al., “Mold-Assisted Nanolithography: A Process for Reliable Pattern Replication,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, Nov./Dec. 1996, pp. 4124-4128, vol. B 14(6).Applicant
- Chou et al., “Imprint Lithography with Sub-10nm Feature Size and High Throughput,” Microelectronic Engineering, 1997, pp. 237-240, vol. 35.Applicant
- Mittal et al., “Precision Motion Control of Magnetic Suspension Acutator Using a Robust Nonlinear Compensation Scheme,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Dec. 1997, pp. 268-280, vol. 2, No. 4.Applicant
- Lee et al., “An Ultraprecision Stage for Alignment of Wafers in Advanced Microlithography,” Precision Engineering, 1997, pp. 113-122, vol. 21, Elsevier Science Inc., 655 Avenue of the Americas, NY, NY 10010.Applicant
- Koseki et al., “Design and Accuracy Evaluation of High-Speed and High-Precision Parallel Mechanism,” Proc. of the 1998 IEEE, Intl. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, May 1998, pp. 1340-1345, Leuven, Belgium.Applicant
- Kim et al., “High Precision Magnetic Levitation Stage for Photolithography,” Precision Engineering, 1998, pp. 66-77, vol. 22, Elsevier Science Inc., 655 Avenue of the Americas, NY, NY 10010.Applicant
- Mansky et al., “Large-Area Domain Alignment in Block Copolymer Thin Films Using Electric Fields,” Macromolecules, 1998, pp. 4399-4401, vol. 31.Applicant
- Feldman et al., “Wafer chuck for manification correction x-ray lithography,” American Vacuum Society, 1998, pp. 3476-3479.Applicant
- Scheer et al., “Problems of the Nanoimprinting Technique for Nanometer Scale Pattern Definition,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, Nov./Dec. 1998, pp. 3917-3921, vol. B 16(6).Applicant
- Lee et al., “Ultra Precision Positioning System for Servo Motor-Piezo Actuator Using the Dual Servo Loop and Digital Filter Implementation,” ASPE, 1998, pp. 287-290, vol. 18.Applicant
- Ohya et al., “Development of 3-DOF Finger Module for Micro Manipulation,” Proc. of the 1999 IEEE/RSJ, Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1999, pp. 894-899.Applicant
- Tanikawa et al., “Development of Small-Sized 3 DOF Finger Moldule in Micro Hand for Micro Manipulation,” Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ, Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1999, pp. 876-881.Applicant
- Ruchhoeft et al., “Patterning Curved Surfaces: Template Generation by Ion Beam Proximity Lithography and Relief Transfer by Step and Flash Imprint Lithography,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 1999, pp. 2965-2982, vol. 17.Applicant
- Choi et al., “Design of Orientation Stages for Step and Flash Imprint Lithography,” Precision Engineering, Journal of the International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology, 2001, pp. 192-199, vol. 25.Applicant
- Choi et al., “High Precision Orientation Alignment and Gap Control Stages for Imprint Lithography Processes,” U.S. Appl. No. 09/698,317, filed Oct. 27, 2000.Applicant
- Choi et al., “A Chucking System for Modulating Shapes of Substrates,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/293,224, filed Nov. 13, 2002.Applicant
- Krug et al., “Fine Patterning of Thin Sol-Gel Films,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1992, pp. 447-450, vol. 147 & 148.Applicant
- Colburn et al., “Step and Flash Imprint Lithography: A New Approach to High-Resolution Patterning,” Proc. Of SPIE, 1999, pp. 379-389, vol. 3676.Applicant
- Chou et al., “Lithography-induced Self Assembly of Periodic Micropillar Arrays,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3197-3202, vol. B17(6).Applicant
- Voisin, “Methods of Manufacturing a Lithography Template,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/136,188, filed May 1, 2002.Applicant
- Sreenivasan et al., “Step and Repeat Imprint Lithography Systems,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/194,414, filed Jul. 11, 2002.Applicant
- Sreenivasan et al., “Step and Repeat Imprint Lithography Processes,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/194,991, filed Jul. 11, 2002.Applicant
- Otto M. et al., “Step and Repeat UV-Nanoimprint Lithography: Material Issues,” Nanoimprint and Nanoprint Technology Conference, San Francisco, Dec. 11-13, 2002.Applicant
- Voisin, “Methods of Inspecting A Lithography Template,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/293,919, filed Nov. 13, 2002.Applicant
- Nimmakayala et al., “Magnification Correction Employing Out-of-Plane Distortion of a Substrate,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/735,110, filed Dec. 12, 2003.Applicant
- Sreenivasan et al., “A Conforming Template for Patterning Liquids Disposed On Substrates,” U.S. Appl. No. 10/614,716, filed Jul. 7, 2003.Applicant
- Abstract of Japanese Patent 63-138730.Applicant
- Abstract of Japanese Patent 55-88332.Applicant
- Abstract of Japanese Patent 57-7931.Applicant
- Abstract of Japanese Patent 02-92603.Applicant
- Translation of Japanese Patent 02-92603.Applicant
- Abstract of Japanese Patent 02-24848.Applicant
- Translation of Japanese Patent 02-24848.Applicant
- Heidari et al., “Nanoimprint Lithography at the 6 In. Wafer Scale,” Journal of Vacuum Science Technology, Nov./Dec. 2000, pp. 3557-3560, vol. B, No. 18(6)/.Applicant
- NERAC.COM Retro Search, “Reduction of Dimension of Contact Holes”, Aug. 31, 2004.Applicant
- NERAC.COM Retro Search, “Trim Etching of Features Formed on an Organic Layer”, Sep. 2, 2004.Applicant
- NERAC.COM Retro Search, “Multi-Layer Resists”, Sep. 2, 2004.Applicant
- Hu et al., “Fluorescence Probe Techniques (FPT) for Measuring the Relative Efficiencies of Free-Radical Photoinitiators”, s0024-9297(97)01390-9;“Macromolecules” 1998, vol. 31, No. 13, pp. 4107-4113, 1998 American Chemical Society. Published on Web May 29, 1998.Applicant
- Feynman, Richard P., “There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom—An Invitation to Enter a New Field of Physics,” 12 pp online Retrieved Sep. 23, 2004 from URl:http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html.Applicant
- Ciba Specialty Chemicals Business Line Coatings, “What is UV Curing?”, 45 pp online Retrieved Sep. 24, 2004 from URL:http://www.cibasc.com/image.asp?id=4040.Applicant
- Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search; International Appl. No. PCT/US2002/015551.Applicant
- Papirer et al., “The Grafting of Perfluorinated Silanes onto the Surface of Silica: Characterization by Inverse Gas Chromatography,” Aug. 1993, pp238-242, vol. 159, Issue 1.Applicant
- Abstract of Papirer et al., “The Grafting of Perfluorinated Silanes onto the Surface of Silica: Characterization by Inverse Gas Chromatography,” Aug. 1993, pp238-242, vol. 159, Issue 1.Applicant
- Hirai et al., “Mold Surface Treatment for Imprint Lithography,” Aug. 2001, pp 457-462, vol. 14, No. 3.Applicant
- Abstract of Hirai et al., “Mold Surface Treatment for Imprint Lithography,” Aug. 2001, pp 457-462, vol. 14, No. 3.Applicant
- Sung et al., “Micro/nano-tribological Characteristics of Self-Assembled Monolayer and its Application in Nano-Structure Fabrication,” Jul. 2003, pp. 808-818, vol. 255, No. 7.Applicant
- Abstract of Sung et al., “Micro/nano-tribological Characteristics of Self-Assembled Monoloayer and its Application in Nano-Structure Fabrication,” Jul. 2003, pp. 808-818, vol. 255, No. 7.Applicant
- Roos et al., “Nanoimprint Lithography with a Commercial 4 Inch Bond System for Hot Embossing,” Oct. 2001, pp. 427-435, vol. 4343.Applicant
- Abstract of Roos et al., “Nanoimprint Lithography with a Commercial 4 Inch Bond System for Hot Embossing,” Oct. 2001, pp. 427-435, vol. 4343.Applicant