US 6,750,325 B1Grant
CD3 specific recombinant antibody
Issue Date:2004-06-15
•9 Claims
•15 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
The invention provides recombinant antibody molecules comprising antigen binding regions derived from the heavy and/or light chain variable regions of a donor anti-CD3 antibody, e.g. OKT3, and which have anti-CD3 binding specificity, preferably of affinity similar to that of OKT3. The recombinant antibody is preferably a humanized antibody and may be a chimeric or CDR-grafted antibody. A method is disclosed for preparing CDR-grafted humanized antibodies in which, in addition to the CDR's non-human antibody residues are preferably used at positions 23, 24, 49, 71, 73 and 78 of the heavy chain variable region and at positions 46, 48, 58, and 71 of the light chain variable region. The recombinant, especially the humanized, anti-CD3 antibodies may be used for in vivo therapy or diagnosis.
Metadata
Assignee
- Celltech R&D Limited
Inventors
- Linda Kay Jolliffe
- Robert Allan Zivin
- John Robert Adair
- Diljeet Singh Athwal
Application Information
Application Number:US 09/348,224
Filing Date:1999-07-06
Priority Date:1989-12-21
Art Unit:7
Classifications
IPC:
C12P 2108C12P 2106A61K 39395
Field of Search:
435 696435 69143525234353201435328536 23535303871530387353038822530867530864
Patent Drawings (15 sheets)
Description
[0002] This Application: is a continuation of U.S. provisional Application Serial No. 08/116,247, Filed: Sep. 3, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,929,212, which is a File Wrapper Continuation of Ser. No. 07/743,377, Filed Oct. 4, 1991, which claims priority from PCT/GB90/02018, Filed Dec. 21, 1990 and GBRI Application No. 8928874.0, Filed Dec. 21, 1989.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0003] The present invention relates to a recombinant antibody molecule (RAM), and especially a humanised antibody molecule (HAM), having specificity for an antigen present in the T-cell receptor-CD3 complex of most T-cells, to a process for its production using recombinant DNA technology and to its therapeutic use.
[0004] In the present application, the term “recombinant antibody molecule” (RAM) is used to describe an antibody produced by an process involving the use of recombinant DNA technology, including any analogues of natural immunoglobulins or their fragments. The term “humanised antibody molecule” (HAM) is used to describe a molecule having an antigen binding site derived from an immunoglobulin from a non-human species, remaining immunoglobulin-derived parts of the molecule being derived from a human immunoglobulin. The antigen binding site may comprise either complete variable domains fused onto constant domains or one or more complementarity determining regions grafted onto appropriate framework regions in the variable domains. The abbreviation “MAb” is used to indicate a monoclonal antibody.
[0005] In the description, reference is made to a number of publications by number. The publications are listed in numerical order at the end of the description.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0006] Natural immunoglobulins have been known for many years, as have the various fragments thereof, such as the Fab, (Fab′)2and Fc fragments, which can be derived by enzymatic cleavage. Natural immunoglobulins comprise a generally Y-shaped molecule having an antigen-binding site towards the end of each upper arm. The remainder of the structure, and particularly the stem of the Y, mediates the effector functions associated with immunoglobulins.
[0007] Natural immunoglobulins have been used in assay, diagnosis and, to a more limited extent, therapy. However, such uses, especially in therapy, have been hindered by the polyclonal nature of natural immunoglobulins. A significant step towards the realisation of the potential of immunoglobulins as therapeutic agents was the discovery of techniques for the preparation of monoclonal antibodies of defined specificity (ref. 1). However, most MAbs are produced by fusions of rodent spleen cells with rodent myeloma cells. They are therefore essentially rodent proteins. There are very few reports of the production of human MAbs.
[0008] Since most available MAbs are of rodent origin, they are naturally antigenic in humans and thus can give rise to an undesirable immune response termed the HAMA (Human Anti-Mouse Antibody) response. Therefore, the use of rodent MAbs as therapeutic agents in humans is inherently limited by the fact that the human subject will mount an immunological response to the MAb and will either remove it entirely or at least reduce its effectiveness. Thus, in practice, MAbs of rodent origin may not be used in patients for more than one or a few treatments as a HAMA response soon develops rendering the MAb ineffective as well as giving rise to undesirable reactions.
[0009] Proposals have therefore been made for making non-human MAbs less antigenic in humans. Such techniques can be generically termed “humanisation” techniques. These techniques generally involve the use of recombinant DNA technology to manipulate DNA sequences encoding the polypeptide chains of the antibody molecule.
[0010] Early methods for humanising MAbs involved production of chimeric antibodies in which an antigen binding site comprising the complete variable domains of one antibody is linked to constant domains derived from another antibody. Methods for carrying out such chimerisation procedures are described in EPO120694 (Celltech Limited), EP0125023 (Genetech Inc. and City of Hope), EP-A-0 171496 (Res. Dev. Corp. Japan), EP-A-0 173 494 (Stanford University), and WO 86/01533 (Celltech Limited). This latter Celltech application (WO 86/01533) discloses a process for preparing an antibody molecule having the variable domains from a mouse MAb and the constant domains from a human immunoglobulin. Such humanised chimeric antibodies, however, still contain a significant proportion of non-human amino acid sequence, i.e. the complete non-human variable domains, and thus may still elicit non-human variable domains, and thus may still elicit some HAMA response, particularly if administered over a prolonged period [Begent al al Br. J.Cancer, 62: 487 (1990)].
[0011] WO 86/01533 also describes the production of an antibody molecule comprising the variable domains of a mouse MAb, the CHl and CL domains of a human immunoglobulin, and a non-immunoglobulin-derived protein in place of the Fc portion of the human immunoglobulin.
[0012] In an alternative approach, described in EP-A-0239400 (Winter), the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of a mouse MAb have been grafted onto the framework regions of the variable domains of a human immunoglobulin by site directed mutagenesis using long oligonucleotides. There are 3 CDRs (CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3) in each of the heavy and light chain variable regions. Such CDR-grafted humanised antibodies are much less likely to give rise to a HAMA response than humanised chimeric antibodies in view of the much lower proportion of non-human amino acid sequence which they contain.
[0013] The earliest work on humanising MAbs by CDR-grafting was carried out on MAbs recognising synthetic antigens, such as the NP or NIP antigens. However, examples in which a mouse MAb recognising lysozyme and a rat MAb recognising an antigen on human T-cells respectively were humanised by CDR-grafting are shown by Verhoeyen et al (ref. 2) and Riechmann et al (ref. 3). The preparation of CDR-grafted antibody to the antigen on human T cells is also described in WO 89/07452 (Medical Research Council).
[0014] In Riechmann et al it was found that transfer of the CDR regions alone (as defined by Kabat refs. 4 and 5) was not sufficient to provide satisfactory antigen binding activity in the CDR-grafted product. Riechmann et al found that it was necessary to convert a serine residue at position 27 of the human sequence to the corresponding rat phenylalanine residue to obtain a CDR-grafted product having satisfactory antigen binding activity. This residue at position 27 of the heavy chain is within the structural loop adjacent to CDR1. A further construct which additionally contained a human serine to rat tyrosine change at position 30 of the heavy chain did not have a significantly altered binding activity over the humanised antibody with the serine to phenylalanine change at position 27 alone. These results indicate that changes to residues of the human sequence outside the CDR regions, in particular in the loop adjacent to CFR1, may be necessary to obtain effective antigen binding activity for CDR-grafted antibodies which recognise more complex antigens. Even so the binding affinity of the best CDR-grafted antibodies obtained was still significantly less than the original MAb.
[0015] Very recently Queen et al (ref. 6) have described the preparation of a humanised antibody that binds to the interleukin 2 receptor, by combining the CDRs of a murine MAb (anti-Tac) with human immunoglobulin framework and constant regions. The human framework regions were chosen to maximise homology with the anti-Tac MAb sequence. In addition computer modelling was used to identify framework amino acid residues which were likely to interact with the CDRs or antigen, and mouse amino acids were used at these positions in the humanised antibody.
[0016] In WO 90/07861 Queen et al propose four criteria for designing humanised immunoglobulins. The first criterion is to use as the human acceptor the framework from a particular human immunoglobulin that is unusually homologous to the non-human donor immunoglobulin to be humanised, or to use a consensus framework from many human antibodies. The second criterion is to use the donor amino acid rather than the acceptor if the human acceptor residue is unusual and the donor residue is typical for human sequences at a specific residue of the framework. The third criterion is to use the donor framework amino acid residue rather than the acceptor at positions immediately adjacent to the CDRs. The fourth criterion is to use the donor amino acid residue at framework positions at which the amino acid is predicted to have a side chain atom within about 3 Å of the CDRs in a three-dimensional immunoglobulin model and to be capable of interacting with the antigen or with the CDRs of the humanised immunoglobulin. It is proposed that criteria two, three of four may be applied in addition or alternatively to criterion one, and may be applied singly or in any combination.
[0017] WO 90/07861 described in detail the preparation of a single CDR-grafted humanised antibody, a humanised antibody having specificity for the p55 Tac protein of the IL-2 receptor. The combination of all four criteria, as above, were employed in designing this humanised antibody, the variable region frameworks of the human antibody Eu (refs. 4 & 5) being used as acceptor. In the resultant humanised antibody the donor CDRs were as defined by Kabat et al (refs. 4 and 5) and in addition the mouse donor residues were used in place of the human acceptor residues, at positions 27, 30, 48, 66, 67, 89, 91, 94, 103, 104, 105 and 107 in the heavy chain and at positions 48, 60 and 63 in the light chain, of the variable region frameworks. The humanised anti-Tac antibody obtained is reported to have an affinity for p55 of 3×109M−1, about one-third of that of the murine MAb.
[0018] OKT3 is a mouse IgG2a/k MAb which recognises an antigen in the T-cell receptor-CD3 complex and has been approved for use in many countries throughout the world as an immunosuppressant in the treatment of acute allograft rejection [Chatenoud et al (ref. 7), and Jeffers et al (ref. 8) However, in view of the murine nature of this MAb, a significant HAMA response, with a major anti-idiotype component, may build up on use. Clearly, it would be highly desirable to diminish or abolish this undesirable HAMA response by suitable humanisation or other recombinant DNA manipulation of this very useful antibody and thus enlarge its area of use. It would also be desirable to apply the techniques of recombinant DNA technology more generally to this useful antibody to prepare RAM products.
[0019] Moreover, we have further investigated the preparation of CDR-grafted humanised antibody molecules and have identified a hierarchy of positions within the framework of the variable regions (i.e. outside both the Kabat CDRs and structural loops of the variable regions) at which the amino acid identities of the residues are important for obtaining CDR-grafted products with satisfactory binding affinity. This has enabled us to establish a protocol for obtaining satisfactory CDR-grafted products which may be applied very widely irrespective of the level of homology between the donor immunoglobulin and acceptor framework. The set of residues which we have identified as being of critical importance does not coincide with the residues identified by Queen et al (ref. 6).
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0020] Accordingly the present invention provides an RAM comprising antigen binding regions derived from the heavy and/or light chain variable regions of a donor anti-CD3 antibody and having anti-CD3 binding specificity, and preferably having an anti-CD3 binding affinity similar to that of OKT3.
[0021] Typically the donor anti-CD3 antibody is a rodent MAb.
[0022] The RAM of the invention may comprise antigen binding regions from any suitable anti-CD3 antibody, typically a rodent anti-CD3 MAb, e.g. a mouse or rat anti-CD3 MAb. The RAM may comprise a recombinant version of whole or a major part of the amino acid sequence of such a MAb. Also the RAM may comprise only the variable region (VH and/or VL) or one or more CDRs of such a MAb. Especially the RAM may comprise amino acid sequences, whether variable region, CDR or other, derived from the specific anti-CD3 MAb (OKT3) hereinafter specifically described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2.
[0023] Preferably the RAM of the present invention is a humanised antibody molecule (HAM) having specificity for CD3 and having an antigen binding site wherein at least one of the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of the variable domain, usually at least two and preferably all of the CDRs, are derived from a non-human anti-CD3 antibody, e.g. a rodent anti-CD3 MAb.
[0024] The RAM may be a chimeric antibody or a CDR-grafted antibody.
[0025] Accordingly, in preferred embodiments the invention provides an anti-CD3 CDR-grafted antibody heavy chain having a variable region domain comprising acceptor framework and donor CD3 binding regions wherein the framework comprises donor residues at at least one of positions 6, 23 and/or 24, 48 and/or 49, 71 and/or 73, 75 and/or 76 and/or 78 and 88 and/or 91.
[0026] More preferably, the heavy chain framework of the preferred embodiment comprises donor residues at positions 23, 24, 49, 71, 73 and 78 or at positions 23, 24 and 49. The residues at positions 71, 73 and 78 of the heavy chain framework are preferably either all acceptor or all donor residues.
[0027] In particularly preferred embodiments the heavy chain framework additionally comprises donor residues at one, some or all of positions 6, 37, 48 and 94. Also it is particularly preferred that residues at positions of the heavy chain framework which are commonly conserved across species, i.e. positions 2, 4, 25, 36, 39, 47, 93, 103, 104, 106 and 107, if not conserved between donor and acceptor, additionally comprise donor residues. Most preferably the heavy chain framework additionally comprises donor residues at positions 2, 4, 6, 25, 36, 37, 39, 47, 48, 93, 94, 103, 104, 106 and 107.
[0028] In addition the heavy chain framework optionally comprises donor residues at one, some or all of positions:
[0029] 1 and 3,
[0030] 72 and 76,
[0031] 69 (if 48 is different between donor and acceptor),
[0032] 38 and 46 (if 48 is the donor residue),
[0033] 80 and 20 (if 69 is the donor residue),
[0034] 67,
[0035] 82 and 18 (if 67 is the donor residue),
[0036] 91,
[0037] 88, and
[0038] any one or more of 9, 11, 41, 87, 108, 110 and 112.
[0039] In the preferred embodiments of the present invention described above and hereinafter, reference is made to CDR-grafted antibody products comprising acceptor framework and donor antigen binding regions. It will be appreciated that the invention is widely applicable to the CDR-grafting of anti-CD3 antibodies in general. Thus, the donor and acceptor antibodies may be anti-CD3 antibodies derived from animals of the same species and even same antibody class or sub-class. More usually, however, the donor and acceptor antibodies are derived from animals of different species. Typically, the donor anti-CD3 antibody is a non-human antibody, such as a rodent MAb, and the acceptor antibody is a human antibody.
[0040] In the CDR-grafted antibody products of the present invention, the donor CD3 binding region typically comprises at least one CDR from the donor antibody. Usually the donor antigen binding region comprises at least two and preferably all three CDRs of each of the heavy chain and/or light chain variable regions. The CDRs may comprise the Kabat CDRs, the structural loop CDRs or a composite of the Kabat and structural loop CDRs and any combination of any of these. Preferably, the antigen binding regions of the CDR-grafted heavy chain variable domain comprise CDRs corresponding to the Kabat CDRs at CDR2 (residues 50-65) and CDR3 (residues 95-100) and a composite of the Kabat and structural loop CDRs at CDR1 (residues 26-35).
[0041] The residue designations given above and elsewhere in the present application are numbered according to the Kabat numbering (refs. 4 and 5). Thus the residue designations do not always correspond directly with the linear numbering of the amino acid residues. The actual linear amino acid sequence may contain fewer or additional amino acids than in the strict Kabat numbering corresponding to a shortening of, or insertion into, a structural component, whether framework or CDR, of the basic variable domain structure. For example, the heavy chain variable region of the anti-Tac antibody described by Queen et al (ref. 6) contains a single amino acid insert (residue 52a) after reside 52 of CDR2 and a three amino acid insert (residues 82a, 82b and 82c) after framework residue 82, in the Kabat numbering. The correct Kabat numbering of residues may be determined for a given antibody by alignment at regions of homology of the sequence of the antibody with a “standard” Kabat numbered sequence.
[0042] The invention also provides in a further preferred embodiment a CDR-grafted antibody light chain having a variable region domain comprising acceptor framework and donor CD3 binding regions wherein the framework comprises donor residues at at least one of positions 1 and/or 3 and 46 and/or 47. Preferably the CDR grafted light chain of this preferred embodiment comprises donor residues at positions 46 and/or 47.
[0043] The invention also provides in a yet further preferred embodiment a CDR-grafted antibody light chain having a variable region domain comprising acceptor framework and donor CD3 binding regions wherein the framework comprises donor residues at at least one of positions 46, 48, 58 and 71.
[0044] More preferably in this latter embodiment, the framework comprises donor residues at all of positions 46, 48, 58 and 71.
[0045] In particularly preferred embodiments of the above preferred embodiments, the light chain framework additionally comprises donor residues at positions 36, 44, 47, 85 and 87. Similarly positions of the light chain framework which are commonly conserved across species, i.e. positions 2, 4, 6, 35, 49, 62, 64-69, 98, 99, 101 and 102, if not conserved between donor and acceptor, additionally comprise donor residues. Most preferably the light chain framework additionally comprises donor residues at positions 2, 4, 6, 35, 36, 38, 44, 47, 49, 62, 64-69, 85, 87, 98, 99, 101 and 102.
[0046] In additions the light chain framework of the above preferred embodiments optionally comprises donor residues at one, some or all of positions:
[0047] 1 and 3,
[0048] 63,
[0049] 60 (if 60 and 54 are able to form at potential saltbridge),
[0050] 70 (if 70 and 24 are able to form a potential saltbridge),
[0051] 73 and 21 (if 47 is different between donor and acceptor),
[0052] 37 and 45 (if 47 is different between donor and acceptor), and
[0053] any one or more of 10, 12, 40, 80, 103 and 105.
[0054] Preferably, the antigen binding regions of the CDR-grafted light chain variable domain comprise CDRs corresponding to the Kabat CDRs at CDR1 (residue 24-34), CDR2 (residues 50-56) and CDR3 (residues 89-97).
[0055] The invention further provides in a fourth aspect a CDR-grafted antibody molecule comprising at least one CDR-grafted heavy chain and at least one CDR-grafted light chain as defined above.
[0056] The CDR-grafted and humanised antibody molecules and chains of the present invention may comprise: a complete antibody molecule, having full length heavy and light chains; a fragment thereof, such as a Fab, (Fab′)2or FV fragment; a light chain or heavy chain monomer or dimer; or a single chain antibody, e.g. a single chain FV in which heavy and light chain variable regions are joined by a peptide linker; or any other CDR-grafted or humanised antibody product with anti-CD3 binding specificity. Similarly the CDR-grafted heavy and light chain variable region may be combined with other antibody domains as appropriate.
[0057] Also the CDR-grafted or humanised heavy or light chains or antibody molecules of the present invention may have attached to them an effector or reporter molecule. For instance, it may have a macrocycle, for chelating a heavy metal atom, or a toxin, such as ricin, attached to it by a covalent bridging structure. Alternatively, the procedures of recombinant DNA technology may be used to produce an immunoglobulin molecule in which the Fc fragment of CH3 domain of a complete immunoglobulin molecule has been replaced by, or has attached thereto by peptide linkage, a functional non-immunoglobulin protein, such as an enzyme or toxin molecule.
[0058] For CDR-grafted antibody products, any appropriate acceptor variable region framework sequences may be used having regard to class/type of the donor antibody from which the antigen binding regions are derived. Preferably, the type of acceptor framework used is of the same/similar class/type as the donor antibody. Conveniently, the framework may be chosen to maximise/optimise homology with the donor antibody sequence particularly at positions close or adjacent to the CDRs. However, a high level of homology between donor and acceptor sequences is not important for application of the present invention. The present invention identifies a hierarchy of framework residue positions at which donor residues may be important or desirable for obtaining a CDR-grafted antibody product having satisfactory binding properties. The present invention advantageously enables the preparation of CDR-grafted antibody products having binding affinities similar to, and even in some cases better than the corresponding donor antibody product, e.g. OKT3 product. Preferably, the CDR-grafted antibody products of the invention have binding affinities of at least about 105M−1, preferably at least about 108M−1and especially within the range 108−1012M−1. In principle, the present invention is applicable to any combination of donor and acceptor antibodies irrespective of the level of homology between their sequences. A protocol for applying the invention to any particular donor-acceptor antibody pair is given hereinafter. Examples of human frameworks which may be used are KOL, NEWM, REI, EU, LAY and POM (refs. 4 and 5); for instance KOL and NEWM for the heavy chain and RE1 for the light chain and EU, LAY and POM for both the heavy chain and the light chain.
[0059] Also the constant region domains of the products of the invention may be selected having regard to the proposed function of the antibody in particular the effector functions which may be required. For example, the constant region domains may be human IgA, IgE, IgG or IgM domains. In particular, IgG human constant region domains may be used, especially of the IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes, when the humanised antibody molecule is intended for therapeutic uses, and antibody effector functions are required. Alternatively, IgG2 and IgG4 isotypes may be used when the humanised antibody molecule is intended for therapeutic purposes and antibody effector functions are not required, e.g. for simple blocking of the T-cell receptor-CD3 complex.
[0060] However, the remainder of the antibody molecules need not comprise only protein sequences from immunoglobulins. For instance, a gene may be constructed in which a DNA sequence encoding part of a human immunoglobulin chain is fused to a DNA sequence encoding the amino acid sequence of a polypeptide effector or reporter molecule.
[0061] Preferably the CDR-grafted heavy and light chain and antibody molecule products are produced by recombinant DNA technology.
[0062] Thus in further aspects the invention also includes DNA sequences coding for the RAMs, HAMs and CDR-grafted heavy and light chains, cloning and expression vectors containing the DNA sequences, host cells transformed with the DNA sequences and processes for producing the CDR-grafted antibody molecules comprising expressing the DNA sequences in the transformed host cells.
[0063] The general methods by which the vectors may be constructed, transfection methods and culture methods are well known per se and form no part of the invention. Such methods are shown, for instance, in references 9 and 10.
[0064] The DNA sequences which encode the anti-CD3 donor amino acid sequences may be obtained by methods well known in the art. For example the anti-CD3 coding sequences may be obtained by genomic cloning, or cDNA cloning from suitable hybridoma cell lines, e.g. the OKT3 cell line hereinafter specifically described. Positive clones may be screened using appropriate probes for the heavy and light chain genes in question. Also PCR cloning may be used.
[0065] DNA coding for acceptor, e.g. human acceptor, sequences may be obtained in any appropriate way. For example DNA sequences coding for preferred human acceptor frameworks such as KOL, REI, EU and NEWM, are widely available to workers in the art.
[0066] The standard techniques of molecular biology may be used to prepare DNA sequences coding for the chimeric and CDR-grafted products. Desired DNA sequences may be synthesised completely or in part using oligonucleotide synthesis techniques. Site-directed mutagenesis and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques may be used as appropriate. For example oligonucleotide directed synthesis as described by Jones et al (ref. 17) may be used. Also oligonucleotide directed mutagenesis of a pre-exising variable region as, for example, described by Verhoeyen et al (ref. 2) or Riechmann et al (ref. 3) may be used. Also enzymatic filling in of gapped oligonucleotides using T4 DNA polymerase as, for example, described by Queen et al (ref. 6) may be used.
[0067] Any suitable host cell/vector system may be used for expression of the DNA sequences coding for the CDR-grafted heavy and light chains. Bacterial e.g. E. coli, and other microbial systems may be used, in particular for expression of antibody fragments such as FAb and (Fab′)2fragments, and especially FV fragments and single chain antibody fragments e.g. single chain FVs. Eucaryotic, e.g. mammalian, host cell expression systems may be used, in particular, for production of larger CDR-grafted antibody products, including complete antibody molecules. Suitable mammalian host cells include CHO cells and myeloma or hybridoma cell lines.
[0068] Thus, according to a further aspect the present invention provides a process for producing an anti-CD3 RAM which process comprises:
[0069] (a) producing in an expression vector an operon having a DNA sequence which encodes an antibody heavy chain wherein at least one CDR of the variable domain is derived from a donor anti-CD3 antibody and remaining immunglobulin-derived parts of the antibody chain are derived from an acceptor immunoglobulin;
[0070] and/or
[0071] (b) producing in an expression vector an operon having a DNA sequence which encodes a complementary antibody light chain wherein at least one CDR of the variable domain is derived from a donor anti-CD3 antibody and the remaining immunoglobulin-derived parts of the antibody chain are derived from an acceptor immunoglobulin;
[0072] (c) transfecting a host cell with the or each vector;
[0073] and
[0074] (d) culturing the transfected cell line to produce the RAM.
[0075] The RAM may comprise only heavy or light chain-derived polypeptide, in which case only a heavy chain or light chain polypeptide coding sequence is used to transfect the host cells.
[0076] For production of RAMs comprising both heavy and light chains, the cell line may be transfected with two vectors. The first vector may contain an operon encoding a light chain-derived polypeptide and the second vector may contain an operon encoding a heavy chain-derived polypeptide. Preferably, the vectors are identical except in so far as the coding sequences and selectable markers are concerned so as to ensure as far as possible that each polypeptide chain is equally expressed. Alternatively, a single vector may be used, the vector including the sequences encoding both light chain- and heavy chain-derived polypeptides.
[0077] The DNA in the coding sequences for the light and heavy chains may comprise cDNA or genomic DNA or both. However, it is preferred that the DNA sequence encoding the heavy or light chain comprises, at least partially, genomic DNA. Most preferably, the heavy or light chain encoding sequence comprises a fusion of cDNA and genomic DNA.
[0078] The present invention also includes therapeutic and diagnostic compositions comprising the RAMs, HAMs and CDR-grafted light and heavy chains and molecules of the invention and uses of such compositions in therapy and diagnosis.
[0079] Accordingly in a further aspect the invention provides a therapeutic or diagnostic composition comprising a RAM, HAM or CDR-grafted antibody heavy or light chain or molecule according to previous aspects of the invention in combination with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, diluent or excipient.
[0080] Accordingly also the invention provides a method of therapy or diagnosis comprising administering an effective amount of a RAM, HAM or CDR-grafted antibody heavy or light chain or molecule according to previous aspects of the invention to a human or animal subject.
[0081] The RAM, HAM and CDR-grafted products of the present invention may be used for any of the therapeutic uses for which anti CD3 antibodies, e.g. OKT3, have been used or may be used in the future. For example, the products may be used as ummunosuppressants, e.g. in the treatment of acute allograft rejection.
[0082] A preferred protocol for obtaining CDR-grafted antibody heavy and light chains in accordance with the present invention is set out below together with the rationale by which we have derived this protocol. This protocol and rationale are given without prejudice to the generality of the invention as hereinbefore described and defined.
[0083] Protocol
[0084] It is first of all necessary to sequence the DNA coding for the heavy and light chain variable regions of the donor antibody, to determine their amino acid sequences. It is also necessary to choose appropriate acceptor heavy and light chain variable regions, of known amino acid sequence. The CDR-grafted chain is then designed starting from the basis of the acceptor sequence. It will be appreciated that in some cases the donor and acceptor amino acid residues may be identical at a particular position and thus no change of acceptor framework residue is required.
[0085] 1. As a first step donor residues are substituted for acceptor residues in the CDRs. For this purpose the CDRs are preferably defined as follows:
| Heavy chain | CDR1: | residues 26-35 | |
| CDR2: | residues 50-65 | ||
| CDR3: | residues 95-102 | ||
| Light chain | CDR1: | residues 24-34 | |
| CDR2: | residues 50-56 | ||
| CDR3: | residues 89-97 | ||
[0086] The positions at which donor residues are to be substituted for acceptor in the framework are then chosen as follows, first of all with respect to the heavy chain and subsequently with respect to the light chain.
[0087] 2. Heavy Chain
[0088] 2.1 Choose donor residues at all of positions 23, 24, 49, 71, 73 and 78 of the heavy chain or all of positions 23, 24 and 49 (71, 73 and 78 are either all donor or all acceptor).
[0089] 2.2 Check that the following have the same amino acid in donor and acceptor sequences, and if not preferably choose the donor: 2, 4, 6, 25, 36, 37, 39, 47, 48, 93, 94, 103, 104, 106 and 107.
[0090] 2.3 To further optimise affinity consider choosing donor residues at one, some or any of:
[0091] i. 1, 3
[0092] ii. 72, 76
[0093] iii. If 48 is different between donor and acceptor sequences, consider 69
[0094] iv. If at 48 the donor residue is chosen, consider 38 and 46
[0095] v. If at 69 the donor residue is chosen, consider 80 and then 20
[0096] vi. 67
[0097] vii. If at 67 the donor residue is chosen, consider 82 and then 18
[0098] viii. 91
[0099] ix. 88
[0100] x. 9, 11, 41, 87, 108, 110, 112
[0101] 3. Light Chain
[0102] 3.1 Choose donor at 46, 48, 58 and 71
[0103] 3.2 Check that the following have the same amino acid in donor and acceptor sequences, if not preferably choose donor: 2, 4, 6, 35, 38, 44, 47, 49, 62, 64-69 inclusive, 85, 87, 98, 99, 101 and 102
[0104] 3.3 To further optimise affinity consider choosing donor residues at one, some or any of:
[0105] i. 1, 3
[0106] ii. 63
[0107] iii. 60, if 60 and 54 are able to form a potential saltbridge
[0108] iv. 70, if 70 and 24 are able to form a potential saltbridge
[0109] v. 73 and 21, if 47 is different between donor and acceptor
[0110] vi. 37 and 45, if 47 is different between donor and acceptor
[0111] vii. 10, 12, 40, 80, 103, 105
[0112] Rationale
[0113] In order to transfer the binding site of an antibody into a different acceptor framework, a number of factors need to be considered.
[0114] 1. The extent of the CDRs
[0115] The CDRs (Complementary Determining Regions) were defined by Wu and Kabat (refs. 4 and 5) on the basis of an analysis of the variability of different regions of antibody variable regions. Three regions per domain were recognised. In the light chain the sequences are 24-34, 50-56, 89-97 (numbering according to Kabat (ref. 4), Eu Index) inclusive and in the heavy chain the sequences are 31-35, 50-65 and 95-102 inclusive.
[0116] When antibody structures became available it became apparent that these CDR regions corresponded in the main to loop regions which extended from the β barrel framework of the light and heavy variable domains. For H1 there was a discrepancy in that the loop was from 26 to 32 inclusive and for H2 to loop was 52-56 and for L2 from 50 to 53. However, with the exception of H1 the CDR regions encompassed the loop regions and extended into the β strand frameworks. In H1 residue 26 tends to be a serine and 27 a phenylalanine or tyrosine, residue 29 is a phenylalanine in most cases. Residues 28 and 30 which are surface residues exposed to solvent might be involved in antigen-binding. A prudent definition of the H1 CDR therefore would include residues 26-35 to include both the loop region and the hypervariable residues 33-35.
[0117] It is of interest to note the example of Riechmann et al (ref. 3), who used the residue 31-35 choice for CDR-H1. In order to produce efficient antigen binding residue 27 also needed to be recruited from the donor (rat) antibody.
[0118] 2. Non-CDR residues which contribute to antigen binding
[0119] By examination of available X-ray structures we have identified a number of residues which may have an effect on net antigen binding and which can be demonstrated by experiment. These residues can be sub-divided into a number of groups.
[0120] 2.1 Surface residues near CDR [all numbering as in Kabat et al (ref. 4)].
[0121] 2.1.1. Heavy Chain—Key residues are 23, 71 and 73. Other residues which may contribute to a lesser extent are 1, 3 and 76. Finally 25 is usually conserved but the murine residue should be used if there is a difference.
[0122] 2.1.2 Light Chain—Many residues close to the CDRs, e.g. 63, 65, 67 and 69 are conserved. If conserved none of the surface residues in the light chain are likely to have a major effect. However, if the murine residue at these positions is unusual, then it would be of benefit to analyse the likely contribution more closely. Other residues which may also contribute to binding are 1 and 3, and also 60 and 70 if the residues at these positions and at 54 and 24 respectively are potentially able to form a salt bridge i.e. 60+54; 70+24.
[0123] 2.2 Packing residues near the CDRs.
[0124] 2.2.1. Heavy Chain—Key residues are 24, 49 and 78. Other key residues would be 36 if not a tryptophan, 94 if not an arginine, 104 and 106 if not glycines and 107 if not a threonine. Residues which may make a further contribution to stable packing of the heavy chain and hence improved affinity are 2, 4, 6, 38, 46, 67 and 69. 67 packs against the CDR residue 63 and this pair could be either both mouse or both human. Finally, residues which contribute to packing in this region but from a longer range are 18, 20, 80, 82 and 86. 82 packs against 67 and in turn 18 packs against 82. 80 packs against 69 and in turn 20 packs against 80. 86 forms an H bond network with 38 and 46. Many of the mouse-human differences appear minor e.g. Leu-Ile, but could have an minor impact on correct pacing which could translate into altered positioning of the CDRs.
[0125] 2.2.2 Light Chain—Key residues are 48, 58 and 71. Other key residues would be 6 if not glutamine, 35 if not tryptophan, 62 if not phenylalanine or tryosine, 64, 66, 68, 99 and 101 if not glycines and 102 if not a threonine. Residues which make a further contribution are 2, 4, 37, 45 and 47. Finally residues 73 and 21 and 19 may make long distance packing contributions of a minor nature.
[0126] 2.3. Residues at the variable domain interface between heavy and light chains—In both the light and heavy chains most of the non-CDR interface residues are conserved. If a conserved residue is replaced by a residue of different character, e.g. size or charge, it should be considered for retention as the murine residue.
[0127] 2.3.1 Heavy Chain—Residues which need to be considered are 37 if the residue is not a valine but is of larger side chain volume or has a charge or polarity. Other residues are 39 if not a glutamine, 45 if not a leucine, 47 if not a tryptophan, 91 if not a phenylalanine or tyrosine, 93 if not an alanine and 103 if not a tryptophan. Residue 89 is also at the interface but is not in a position where the side chain could be of great impact.
[0128] 2.3.2. Light Chain—Residues which need to be considered are 36, if not a tyrosine, 38 if not a glutamine, 44 if not a proline, 46, 49 if not a tyrosine, residue 85, residue 87 if not a tyrosine and 98 if not a phenylalanine.
[0129] 2.4. Variable-Constant region interface—The elbow angle between variable and constant regions may be affected by alterations in packing of key residues in the variable region against the constant region which may effect the position of VLand VHwith respect to one another. Therefore it is worth noting the residues likely to be in contact with the constant region. In the heavy chain the surface residues potentially in contact with the variable region are conserved between mouse and human antibodies therefore the variable region contact residues may influence the V-C interaction. In the light chain the amino acids found at a number of the constant region contact points vary, and the V & C regions are not in such close proximity as the heavy chain. Therefore the influences of the light chain V-C interface may be minor.
[0130] 2.4.1. Heavy Chain—Contact residues are 7, 11, 41, 87, 108, 110, 112.
[0131] 2.4.2. Light Chain—In the light chain potentially contacting residues are 10, 12, 40, 80, 83, 103 and 105.
[0132] The above analysis coupled with our considerable practical experimental experience in the CDR-grafting of a number of different antibodies have lead us to the protocol given above.
[0133] The present invention is now described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying FIGS. 1-13.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0134] FIGS. 1aand bshown in DNA and amino acid sequences of the OKT3 light chain (SEQ ID NO:4 and 5):
[0135] FIGS. 2aand 6 show DNA and amino acid sequences of the OKT3 heavy chain SEQ ID NO:6 and 7);
[0136] FIG. 3 shows the alignment of the OKT3 light variable region amino acid sequence with that of the light variable region of the human antibody REI;
[0137] FIG. 4 shows the alignment of the OKT3 heavy variable region amino acid sequence with that of the heavy variable region of the human antibody KOL;
[0138] FIGS. 5A-C show the heavy variable region amino acid sequence of OKT3, KOL and various CDR grafts — SEQ ID NOs:10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 11, respectively
[0139] FIG. 6 shows the light variable region amino acid sequences of OKT3, REI and various corresponding CDR grafts SEQ ID Nos:8, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 9, respectively;
[0140] FIG. 7 shows a graph of binding assay results for various grafted OKT3 antibodies′
[0141] FIG. 8 shows a graph of blocking assay results for various grafted OKT3 antibodies;
[0142] FIG. 9 shows a similar graph of blocking assay results;
[0143] FIGS. 10 shows similar graphs for both binding assay and blocking assay results;
[0144] FIGS. 11 shows further similar graphs for both binding assay and blocking assay results;
[0145] FIG. 12 shows a graph of competition assay results for a minimally grafted OKT3 antibody compared with the OKT3 murine reference standard, and
[0146] FIG. 13 shows a similar graph of competition assay results comparing a fully grafted OKT3 antibody with the murine reference standard.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
EXAMPLE
Material and Methods
[0147] 1. INCOMING CELLS
[0148] Hybridoma cells producing antibody OKT3 were provided by Ortho (seedlot 4882.1) and were grown up in antibiotic free Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) supplemented with glutamine and 5% foetal calf serum, and divided to provide both an overgrown supernatant for evaluation and cells for extraction of RNA. The overgrown supernatant was shown to contain 250 ug/mL murine IgG2a/kappa antibody. The supernatant was negative for murine lambda light chain and IgG1, IgG2b, IgG3, IgA and IgM heavy chain. 20 mL of supernatant was assayed to confirm that the antibody present was OKT3.
[0149] 2. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY PROCEDURES
[0150] Basic molecular biology procedures were as described in Maniatis et al (ref. 9) with, in some cases, minor modifications. DNA sequencing was performed as described in Sanger et al (ref. 11) and the Amersham International Plc sequencing handbook. Site directed mutagenesis was as described in Kramer et al (ref. 12) and the Anglian Biotechnology Ltd. handbook. COS cell expression and metabolic labelling studies were as described in Whittle et al (ref. 13)
[0151] 3. RESEARCH ASSAYS
[0152] 3.1. ASSEMBLY ASSAYS
[0153] Assembly assays were performed on supernatants from transfected COS cells to determine the amount of intact IgG present.
[0154] 3.1.1. COST CELLS TRANSFECTED WITH MOUSE OKT3 GENES
[0155] The assembly assay for intact mouse IgG in COS cell supernatants was an ELISA with the following format:
[0156] 96 well microtitre plates were coated with F(ab′)2goat anti-mouse IgG Fc. The plates were washed in water and samples added for 1 hour at room temperature. The plates were washed and F(ab′)2goat anti-mouse IgG F(ab′)2(HRPO conjugated) was then added. Substrate was added to reveal the reaction. UPC10, a mouse IgG2a myeloma, was used as a standard.
[0157] 3.1.2. COS AND CHO CELLS TRANSFECTED WITH CHIMERIC OR CDR-GRAFTED OKT3 GENES
[0158] The assembly assay for chimeric or CDR-grafted antibody in COS cell supernatants was an ELISA with the following format:
[0159] 96 well microtitre plates were coated with F(ab′)2goat anti-human IgG Fc. The plates were washed and samples added and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. The plates were washed and monoclonal mouse anti-human kappa chain was added for 1 hour at room temperature. The plates were washed and F(ab′)2goat anti-mouse IgG Fc (HRPO conjugated) was added. Enzyme substrate was added to reveal the reaction. Chimeric B72.3 (IgG4) (ref. 13) was used as a standard. The use of a monoclonal anti-kappa chain in this assay allows grafted antibodies to be read from the chimeric standard.
[0160] 3.2. ASSAY FOR ANTIGEN BINDING ACTIVITY
[0161] Material from COS cell supernatants was assayed for OKT3 antigen binding activity onto CD3 positive cells in a direct assay. The procedure was as follows:
[0162] HUT 78 cells (human T cell line, CD3 positive) were maintained in culture. Monolayers of HUT 78 cells were prepared onto 96 well ELISA plates using poly-L-lysine and glutaraldehyde. Samples were added to the monolayers for 1 hour at room temperature. The plates were washed gently using PBS. F(ab′)2goat anti-human IgG Fc (HRPO conjugated) or F(ab′)2goat anti-mouse IgG Fc (HRPO conjugated) was added as appropriate for humanised or mouse samples. Substrate was added to reveal the reaction. The negative control for the cell-based assay was chimer B72.3. The positive control was mouse Orthomune OKT3 or chimeric OKT3, when available. This cell-based assay was difficult to perform, and an alternative assay was developed for CDR-grafted OKT3 which was more sensitive and easier to carry out. In this system, CDR-grafted OKT3 produced by COS cells was tested for its ability to bind to the CD3-positive HPB-ALL (human peripheral blood acute lymphocytic leukemia) cell line. It was also tested for its ability to block the binding of murine OKT3 to these cells. Binding was measured by the following procedure: HPB-ALL cells were harvested from tissue culture. Cells were incubated at 4° C. for 1 hour with various dilutions of test antibody, positive control antibody, or negative control antibody. The cells were washed once and incubated at 4° C. for 1 hour with an FITC-labelled goat anti-human IgG (Fc− specific, mouse absorbed). The cells were washed twice and analysed by cytofluorography. Chimeric OKT3 was used as a positive control for direct binding. Cells incubated with mock-transfected COS cell supernatant, followed by the FITC-labelled goat anti-human IgG, provided the negative control. To test the ability of CDR-grafted OKT3 to block murine OKT3 binding, the HPB-ALL cells were incubated at 4° C. for 1 hour with various dilutions of test antibody or control antibody. A fixed saturating amount of FITC OKT3 was added. The samples were incubated for 1 hour at 4° C., washed twice and analysed by cytofluorography. FITC-labelled OKT3 was used as a positive control to determine maximum binding. Unlabelled murine OKT3 served as a reference standard for blocking. Negative controls were unstained cells with or without mock-transfected cell supernatant. The ability of the CDR-grafted OKT3 light chain to bind CD3-positive cells and block the binding of murine OKT3 was initially tested in combination with the chimeric OKT3 heavy chain. The chimeric OKT3heavy chain is composed of the murine OKT3 variable region and the human IgG4 constant region. The chimeric heavy chain gene is expressed in the same expression vector used for the CDR-grafted genes. The CDR-grafted light chain expression vector and the chimeric heavy chain expression vector were co-transfected into COS cells. The fully chimeric OKT3 antibody (chimeric light chain and chimeric heavy chain) was found to be fully capable of binding to CD3 positive cells and blocking the binding of murine OKT3 to these cells.
[0163] 3.3 DETERMINATION OF RELATIVE BINDING AFFINITY
[0164] The relative binding affinities of CDR-grafted anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies were determined by competition binding (ref. 6) using the EPB-ALL human T cell line as a source of CD3 antigen, and fluorescein-conjugated murine OKT3 (Fl-OKT3) of known binding affinity as a tracer antibody. The binding affinity of Fl-OKT3 tracer antibody was determined by a direct binding assay in which increasing amounts of Fl-OKT3 were incubated with HPB-ALL (5×105) in PBS with 5% foetal calf serum for 60 min. at 4° C. Cells were washed, and the fluorescence intensity was determined on a FACScan flow cytometer calibrated with quantitative microbead standards (Flow Cytometry Standards, Research Triangle Park, N.C.). Fluorescence intensity per antibody molecule (F/P ratio) was determined by using microbeads which have a predetermined number of mouse IgG antibody binding sites (Simply Cellular beads, Flow Cytometry Standards). F/P equals the fluorescence intensity of beads saturated with Fl-OKT3 divided by the number of binding sites per bead. The amount of bound and free Fl-OKT3 was calculated from the mean fluorescence intensity per cell, and the ratio of bound/free was plotted against the number of moles of antibody bound. A linear fit was used to determine the affinity of binding (absolute value of the slope).
[0165] For competitive binding, increasing amounts of competitor antibody were added to a sub-saturating dose of Fl-OKT3 and incubated with 5×105HPB-ALL in 200 μl of PBS with 5% foetal calf serum, for 60 min at 4° C. The fluorescence intensities of the cells were measured on a FACScan flow cytometer calibrated with quantitative microbead standards.
[0166] The concentrations of bound and free Fl-OKT3 were calculated. The affinities of competing antibodies were calculated from the equation [X]−[OKT3]=(1/Kx)−(1/Ka), where Ka is the affinity of murine OKT3, Kx is the affinity of competitor X, [] is the concentration of competitor antibody at which bound/free binding is R/2, and R is the maximal bound/free binding.
[0167] 4. cDNA LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION
[0168] 4.1. mRNA PREPARATION AND cDNA SYNTHESIS
[0169] OKT3 producing cells were grown as described above and 1.2×109cells harvested and mRNA extracted using the guanidinium/LiCl extraction procedure. cDNA was prepared by priming from Oligo-dT to generate full length cDNA. The cDNA was methylated and EcoR1 linkers added for cloning.
[0170] 4.2. LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION
[0171] The cDNA library was ligated to pSP65 vector DNA which had been EcoR1 cut and the 5′ phosphate groups removed by calf intestinal phosphatase (EcoR1/CIP). The ligation was used to transform high transformation efficiency Escherichia coli(E. coli) HB101. A cDNA library was prepared. 3600 colonies were screened for the light chain and 10000 colonies were screened for the heavy chain.
[0172] 5. SCREENING
[0173] E. colicolonies positive for either heavy or light chain probes were identified by oligonucleotide screening using the oligonucleotides:
[0174] 5′ TCCAGATGTTAACTGCTCAC (SEQ ID NO: 1) for the light chain, which is complementary to a sequence in the mouse kappa constant region, and 5′ CAGGGGCCAGTGGATGGATAGAC (SEQ ID NO: 2) for the heavy chain which is complementary to a sequence in the mouse IgG2a constant CH1 domain region. 12 light chain and 9 heavy chain clones were identified and taken for second round screening. Positive clones from the second round of screening were grown up and DNA prepared. The sizes of the gene inserts were estimated by gel electrophoresis and inserts of a size capable of containing a full length cDNA were subcloned into M13 for DNA sequencing.
[0175] 6. DNA SEQUENCING
[0176] Clones representing four size classes for both heavy and light chains were obtained in M13. DNA sequence for the 5′ untranslated regions, signal sequences, variable regions and 3′ untranslated regions of full length cDNAs [FIGS. 1(a) and 2(a)] were obtained and the corresponding amino acid sequences predicted [(FIGS. 1(b) and 2(b)]. In FIG. 1(a) the untranslated DNA regions are shown in uppercase, and in both FIGS. 1 and 2 the signal sequences are underlined.
[0177] 7. CONSTRUCTION OF cDNA EXPRESSION VECTORS
[0178] Celltech expression vectors are based on the plasmid pEE6hCMV (ref. 14). A polylinker for the insertion of genes to be expressed has been introduced after the major immediate early promoter/enhancer of the human Cytomegalovirus (hCMV). Marker genes for selection of the plasmid in transfected eukaryotic cells can be inserted as BamH1 cassettes in the unique BamH1 site of pEE6 hCMV; for instance, the neo marker to provide pEE6 hCMV neo. It is usual practice to insert the neo and gpt markers prior to insertion of the gene of interest, whereas the GS marker is inserted last because of the presence of internal EcoR1 sites in the cassette. The selectable markers are expressed from the SV40 late promoter which also provides an origin of replication so that the vectors can be used for expression in the COS cell transient expression system.
[0179] The mouse sequences were excised from the M13 based vectors described above as EcoR1 fragments and cloned into either pEE6-hCMV-neo for the heavy chain and into EE6-hCMV-gpt for the light chain to yield vectors pJA136 and pJA135 respectively.
[0180] 8. EXPRESSION OF cDNAS IN COS CELLS
[0181] Plasmids pJA135 and pJA136 were co-transfected into COS cells and supernatant from the transient expression experiment was shown to contain assembled antibody which bound to T-cell enriched lymphocytes. Metabolic labelling experiments using 35S methionine showed expression and assembly of heavy and light chains.
[0182] 9. CONSTRUCTION OF CHIMERIC GENES
[0183] Construction of chimeric genes followed a previously described strategy [Whittle et al (ref. 13)]. A restriction site near the 3′ end of the variable domain sequence is identified and used to attach an oligonucleotide adapter coding for the remainder of the mouse variable region and a suitable restriction site for attachment to the constant region of choice.
[0184] 9.1. LIGHT CHAIN GENE CONSTRUCTION
[0185] The mouse light chain cDNA sequence contains an Aval site near the 3′ end of the variable region [FIG. 1(a)]. The majority of the sequence of the variable region was isolated as a 396 bp. EcoR1-Aval fragment. An oligonucleotide adapter was designed to replace the remainder of the 3′ region of the variable region from the Aval site and to include the 5′ residues of the human constant region up to and including a unique Nar1 site which had been previously engineered into the constant region.
[0186] A Hind111 site was introduced to act as a marker for insertion of the linker.
[0187] The linker was ligated to the VLfragment and the 413 bp EcoR1-Nar1 adapted fragment was purified from the ligation mixture.
[0188] The constant region was isolated as an Nar1-BamH1 fragment from an M13 clone NW361 and was ligated with the variable region DNA into an EcoR1/BamH1/C1P pSP65 treated vector in a three way reaction to yield plasmid JA143. Clones were isolated after transformation into E. coliand the linker and junction sequences were confirmed by the presence of the Hind111 site and by DNA sequencing.
[0189] 9.2 LIGHT CHAIN GENE CONSTRUCTION—VERSION 2
[0190] The construction of the first chimeric light chain gene produces a fusion of mouse and human amino acid sequences at the variable-constant region junction. In the case of the OKT3 light chain the amino acids at the chimera junction are:
[0191] This arrangement of sequence introduces a potential site for Asparagine (Asn) linked (N-linked) glycosylation at the V-C junction. Therefore, a second version of the chimeric light chain oligonucleotide adapter was designed in which the threonine (Thr), the first amino acid of the human constant region, was replaced with the equivalent amino acid from the mouse constant region, Alanine (Ala).
[0192] An internal Hind111 site was not included in this adapter, to differentiate the two chimeric light chain genes.
[0193] The variable region fragment was isolated as a 376 bp EcoR1-Aval fragment. The oligonucleotide linker was ligated to Nar1 cut pNW361 and then the adapted 396 bp constant region was isolated after recutting the modified pNW361 with EcoR1. The variable region fragment and the modified constant region fragment were ligated directly into EcoR1/C1P treated pEE6hCMVneo to yield pJA137.
[0194] Initially all clones examined had the insert in the incorrect orientation. Therefore, the insert was re-isolated and recloned to turn the insert round and yield plasmid pJA141. Several clones with the insert in the correct orientation were obtained and the adapter sequence of one was confirmed by DNA sequencing
[0195] 9.3. HEAVY CHAIN GENE CONSTRUCTION
[0196] 9.3.1. CHOICE OF HEAVY CHAIN GENE ISOTYPE
[0197] The constant region isotype chosen for the heavy chain was human IgG4.
[0198] 9.3.2. GENE CONSTRUCTION
[0199] The heavy chain cDNA sequence showed a Ban1 site near the 3′ end of the variable region [FIG. 2(a)].
[0200] The majority of the sequence of the variable region was isolated as a 426 bp. EcoR1/C1P/Ban1 fragment. An oligonucleotide adapter was designated to replace the remainder of the 3′ region of the variable region from the Ban1 site up to and including a unique HindIII site which had been previously engineered into the first two amino acids of the constant region.
[0201] The linker was ligated to the VHfragment and the EcoR1-Hind111 adapted fragment was purified from the ligation mixture.
[0202] The variable region was ligated to the constant region by cutting pJA91 (ref. ??) with EcoR1 and Hind111 removing the intron fragment and replacing it with the VHto yield pJA142. Clones were isolated after transformation into E. coliJM101 and the linker and junction sequences were confirmed by DNA sequencing. (N.B. The Hind111 site is lost on cloning).
[0203] 10. CONSTRUCTION OF CHIMERIC EXPRESSION VECTORS
[0204] 10.1. neo AND gpt VECTORS
[0205] The chimeric light chain (version 1) was removed from pJA143 as an EcoR1 fragment and cloned into EcoR1/C1P treated pEE6hCMVneo expression vector to yield pJA145. Clones with the insert in the correct orientation was identified by restriction mapping.
[0206] The chimeric light chain (version 2) was constructed as described above.
[0207] The chimeric heavy chain gene was isolated from pJA142 as a 2.5 Kbp EcoR1/BamH1 fragment and cloned into the EcoR1/Bc11/C1P treated vector fragment of a derivative of pEE6hCMVgpt to yield plasmid pJA144.
[0208] 10.2. GS SEPARATE VECTORS
[0209] GS versions of pJA141 and pJA144 were constructed by replacing the neo and gpt cassettes by a BamH1/Sa11/C1P treatment of the plasmids, isolation of the vector fragment and ligation to a GS-containing fragment from the plasmid pRO49 to yield the light chain vector pJA179 and the heavy chain vector pJA180.
[0210] 10.3. GS SINGLE VECTOR CONSTRUCTION
[0211] Single vector constructions containing the cL (chimeric light), cH (chimeric heavy) and GS genes on one plasmid in the order cL-cH-GS, or cH-cL-GS and with transcription of the genes being head to tail e.g. cL>cH>GS were constructed. These plasmids were made by treating pJA179 or pJA180 with BamH1/C1P and ligating in a Bg111/Hind111 hCMV promoter cassette along with either the Hind111/ BamH1 fragment from pJA141 into pJA180 to give the cH-cL-GS plasmid pJA182 or the Hind111/BamH1 fragment from pJA144 into pJA179 to give the cL-CH-GS plasmid pJA181.
[0212] 11. EXPRESSION OF CHIMERIC GENES
[0213] 11.1. EXPRESSION IN COS CELLS
[0214] The chimeric antibody plasmid pJA145 (cL) and pJA144 (cH) were co-transfected in COS cells and supernatant from the transient expression experiment was shown to contain assembled antibody which bound to the HUT 78 human T-cell line. Metabolic labelling experiments using 35S methionine showed expression and assembly of heavy and light chains. However the light chain mobility seen on reduced gels suggested that the potential glycosylation site was being glycosylated. Expression in COS cells in the presence of tunicamycin showed a reduction in size of the light chain to that shown for control chimeric antibodies and the OKT3 mouse light chain. Therefore JA141 was constructed and expressed. In this case the light chain did not show an aberrant mobility or a size shift in the presence or absence of tunicamycin. This second version of the chimeric light chain, when expressed in association with chimeric heavy (cH) chain, produced antibody which showed good binding to HUT 78 cells. In both cases antigen binding was equivalent to that of the mouse antibody.
[0215] 11.2 EXPRESSION IN CHINESE HAMSTER OVARY (CHO) CELLS
[0216] Stable cell lines have been prepared from plasmids PJA141/pJA144 and from pJA179/pJA180, pJA181 and pJA182 by transfection into CHO cells.
[0217] 12. CDR-GRAFTING
[0218] The approach taken was to try to introduce sufficient mouse residues into a human variable region framework to generate antigen binding activity comparable to the mouse and chimeric antibodies.
[0219] 12.1. VARIABLE REGION ANALYSIS
[0220] From an examination of a small database of structures of antibodies and antigen-antibody complexes it is clear that only a small number of antibody residues make direct contact with antigen. Other residues may contribute to antigen binding by positioning the contact residues in favourable configurations and also by inducing a stable packing of the individual variable domains and stable interaction of the light and heavy chain variable domains. The residues chosen for transfer can be identified in a number of ways:
[0221] (a) By examination of antibody X-ray crystal structures the antigen binding surface can be predominantly located on a series of loops, three per domain, which extend from the B-barrel framework.
[0222] (b) By analysis of antibody variable domain sequences regions of hypervariability [termed the Complementarity Determining Regions (CDRs) by Wu and Kabat (ref. 5)] can be identified. In the most but not all cases these CDRs correspond to, but extend a short way beyond, the loop regions noted above.
[0223] (c) Residues not identified by (a) and (b) may contribute to antigen binding directly or indirectly by affecting antigen binding site topology, or by inducing a stable packing of the individual variable domains and stabilising the inter-variable domain interaction. These residues may be identified either by superimposing the sequences for a given antibody on a known structure and looking at key residues for their contribution, or by sequence alignment analysis and noting “idiosyncratic” residues followed by examination of their structural location and likely effects.
[0224] 12.1.1. LIGHT CHAIN
[0225] FIG. 3 shows an alignment of sequences for the human framework region RE1 and the OKT3 light variable region. The structural loops (LOOP) and CDRs (KABAT) believed to correspond to the antigen binding region are marked. Also marked are a number of other residues which may also contribute to antigen binding as described in 13.1(c). Above the sequence in FIG. 3 the residue type indicates the spatial location of each residue side chain, derived by examination of resolved structures from X-ray crystallography analysis. The key to this residue type designation is as follows:
[0226] N—near to CDR (From X-ray Structures)
[0227] P—Packing
[0228] S—Surface
[0229] I—Interface
[0230] —Packing/Part Exposed
[0231] B—Buried Non-Packing
[0232] E—Exposed
[0233] *—Interface
[0234] ?—Non-CDR Residues which may require to be left as Mouse sequence.
[0235] Residues underlined in FIG. 3 are amino acids. RE1 was chosen as the human framework because the light chain is a kappa chain and the kappa variable regions show higher homology with the mouse sequences than a lambda light variable region, e.g. KOL (see below). RE1 was chosen in preference to another kappa light chain because the X-ray structure of the light chain has been determined so that a structural examination of individual residues could be made.
[0236] 12.1.2. HEAVY CHAIN
[0237] Similarly FIG. 4 shows an alignment of sequences for the human framework region KOL and the OKT3 heavy variable region. The structural loops and CDRs believed to correspond to the antigen binding region are marked. Also marked are a number of other residues which may also contribute to antigen binding as described in 12.1(c). The residue type key and other indicators used in FIG. 4 are the same as those used in FIG. 3.
[0238] KOL was chosen as the heavy chain framework because the X-ray structure has been determined to a better resolution than, for example, NEWM and also the sequence alignment of OKT3 heavy variable region showed a slightly better homology to KOL than to NEWM.
[0239] 12.2. DESIGN OF VARIABLE GENES
[0240] The variable region domains were designed with mouse variable region optimal codon usage [Grantham and Perrin (ref. 15)] and used the B72.3 signal sequences [Whittle et al (ref. 13)]. The sequences were designed to be attached to the constant region in the same way as for the chimeric genes described above. Some constructs contained the “Kozak consensus sequence” [Kozak (ref. 16)] directly linked to the 5′ of the signal sequence in the gene. This sequence motif is believed to have a beneficial role in translation initiation in eukaryotes.
[0241] 12.3. GENE CONSTRUCTION
[0242] To build the variable regions, various strategies are available. The sequence may be assembled by using oligonucleotides in a manner similar to Jones et al (ref. 17) or by simultaneously replacing all of the CDRs or loop regions by oligonucleotide directed site specific mutagenesis in a manner similar to Verhoeyen et al (ref. 2). Both strategies were used and a list of constructions is set out in Tables 1 and 2 and FIGS. 4 and 5. It was noted in several cases that the mutagenesis approach led to deletions and rearrangements in the gene being remodelled, while the success of the assembly approach was very sensitive to the quality of the oligonucleotides.
[0243] 13. CONSTRUCTION OF EXPRESSION VECTORS
[0244] Genes were isolated from M13 or SP65 based intermediate vectors and cloned into pEE6hCMVneo for the light chains and pEE6hCMVgpt for the heavy chains in a manner similar to that for the chimeric genes as described above.
| TABLE 1 |
|---|
| CDR-GRAFTED GENE CONSTRUCTS |
[0245] 14. EXPRESSION OF CDR-GRAFTED GENES
[0246] 14.1. PRODUCTION OF ANTIBODY CONSISTING OF GRAFTED LIGHT (gL) CHAINS WITH MOUSE HEAVY (mH) OR CHIMERIC HEAVY (cH) CHAINS
[0247] All gL chains, in association with mH or cH produced reasonable amounts of antibody. Insertion of the Kozak consensus sequence at a position 5′ to the ATG (kgL constructs) however, led to a 2-5 fold improvement in net expression. Over an extended series of experiments expression levels were raised from approximately 200 ng/ml to approximately 500 ng/ml for kgL/cH or kgL/mH combinations.
[0248] When direct binding to antigen on HUT 78 cells was measured, a construct designed to include mouse sequence based on loop length (gL121) did not lead to active antibody in association with mH or cH. A construct designed to include mouse sequence based on Kabat CDRs (gL221) demonstrated some weak binding in association with mH or cH. However, when framework residues 1, 3, 46, 47 were changed from the human to the murine OKT3 equivalents based on the arguments outlined in Section 12.1 antigen binding was demonstrated when both of the new constructs, which were termed 121A and 221A were co-expressed with cH. When the effects of these residues were examined in more detail, it appears that residues 1 and 3 are not major contributing residues as the product of the gL221B gene shows little detectable binding activity in association with cH. The light chain product of gL221C, in which mouse sequences are present at 46 and 47, shows good binding activity in association with cH.
[0249] 14.2 PRODUCTION OF ANTIBODY CONSISTING OF GRAFTED HEAVY (gH) CHAINS WITH MOUSE LIGHT (mL) OR CHIMERIC LIGHT (cL) CHAINS
[0250] Expression of the gH genes proved to be more difficult to achieve than for gL. First, inclusion of the Kozak sequence appeared to have no marked effect on expression of gH genes. Expression appears to be slightly improved but not to the same degree as seen for the grafted light chain.
[0251] Also, it proved difficult to demonstrate production of expected quantities of material when the loop choice (amino acid 26-32) for CDR1 is used, e.g. gH121, 131, 141 and no conclusions can be drawn about these constructs.
[0252] Moreover, co-expression of the gH341 gene with cL or mL has been variable and has tended to produce lower amounts of antibody than the cH/cL or mH/mL combinations. The alterations to gH341 to produce gH341A and gH341B lead to improved levels of expression.
[0253] This may be due either to a general increase in the fraction of mouse sequence in the variable region, or to the alteration at position 63 where the residue is returned to the human amino acid Valine (Val) from Phenylalanine (Phe) to avoid possible internal packing problems with the rest of the human framework. This arrangement also occurs in gH331 and gH321.
[0254] When gH321 or gH331 were expressed in association with cL, antibody was produced but antibody binding activity was not detected.
[0255] When the more conservative gH341 gene was used antigen binding could be detected in association with cL or mL, but the activity was only marginally above the background level.
[0256] When further mouse residues were substituted based on the arguments in 12.1, antigen binding could be clearly demonstrated for the antibody produced when kgH341A and kgH341B were expressed in association with cL.
[0257] 14.3 PRODUCTION OF FULLY CDR-GRAFTED ANTIBODY
[0258] The kgL221A gene was co-expressed with kgH341, kgH341A or kgH341B. For the combination kgH221A/kgH341 very little material was produced in a normal COS cell expression.
[0259] For the combinations kgL221A/kgH341A or kgH221A/kgH341B amounts of antibody similar to gL/cH was produced.
[0260] In several experiments no antigen binding activity could be detected with kgH221A/gH341 or kgH221A/kgH341 combinations, although expression levels were very low.
[0261] Antigen binding was detected when kgL221A/kgH341A or kgH221A/kgH341B combinations were expressed. In the case of the antibody produced from the kgL221A/kgH341A combination the antigen binding was very similar to that of the chimeric antibody.
[0262] An analysis of the above results is given below.
[0263] 15. DISCUSSION OF CDR-GRAFTING RESULTS
[0264] In the design of the fully humanised antibody the aim was to transfer the minimum number of mouse amino acids that would confer antigen binding onto a human antibody framework.
[0265] 15.1. LIGHT CHAIN
[0266] 15.1.1. EXTENT OF THE CDRs
[0267] For the light chain the regions defining the loops known from structural studies of other antibodies to contain the antigen contacting residues, and those hypervariable sequences defined by Kabat et al (refs. 4 and 5) as Complementarity Determining Regions (CDRs) are equivalent for CDR2. For CDR1 the hypervariable region extends from residues 24-34 inclusive while the structural loop extends from 26-32 inclusive. In the case of OKT3 there is only one amino acid difference between the two options, at amino acid 24, where the mouse sequence is a serine and the human framework RE1 has glutamine. For CDR3 the loop extends from residues 91-96 inclusive while the Kabat hypervariability extends from residues 89-97 inclusive. For OKT3 amino acids 89, 90 and 97 are the same between OKT3 and RE1 (FIG. 3). When constructs based on the loop choice for CDR1 (gL121) and the Kabat choice (gL221) were made and co-expressed with mH or cH no evidence for antigen binding activity could be found for gL121, but trace activity could be detected for the gL221, suggesting that a single extra mouse residue in the grafted variable region could have some detectable effect. Both gene constructs were reasonable well expressed in the transient expression system.
[0268] 15.1.2. FRAMEWORK RESIDUES
[0269] The remaining framework residues were then further examined, in particular amino acids known from X-ray analysis of other antibodies to be close to the CDRs and also those amino acids which in OKT3 showed differences from the consensus framework for the mouse subgroup (subgroup VI) to which OKT3 shows most homology. Four positions 1, 3, 46 and 47 were identified and their possible contribution was examined by substituting the mouse amino acid for the human amino acid at each position.
[0270] Therefore gL221A (gL221+D1Q, Q3V, L46R, L47W, see FIG. 3 and Table 1) was made, cloned in EE6hCMVneo and co-expressed with cH (pJA144). The resultant antibody was well expressed and showed good binding activity. When the related genes gL221B (gL221+D1Q, Q3V) and gL221C (gL221+L46R, L47W) were made and similarly tested, while both genes produced antibody when co-expressed with cH, only the gl221C/cH combination showed good antigen binding. When the gL121A (gL121+D1Q, Q3V, L46R, L47W) gene was made and co-expressed with cH, antibody was produced which also bound to antigen.
[0271] 15.2. HEAVY CHAIN
[0272] 15.2.1. EXTENT OF THE CDRs
[0273] For the heavy chain the loop and hypervariability analyses agree only in CDR3. For CDR1 the loop region extends from residues 26-32 inclusive whereas the Kabat CDR extends from residues 31-35 inclusive. For CDR2 the loop region is from 50-58 inclusive while the hypervariable region covers amino acids 50-65 inclusive. Therefore humanised heavy chains were constructed using the framework from antibody KOL and with various combinations of these CDR choices, including a shorter choice for CDR2 of 50-56 inclusive as there was some uncertainty as to the definition of the end point for the CDR2 loop around residues 56 to 58. The genes were co-expressed with mL or cL initially. In the case of the gH genes with loop choices for CDR1 e.g. gH121, gH131, gH141 very little antibody was produced in the culture supernatants. As no free light chain was detected it was presumed that the antibody was being made and assembled inside the cell but that the heavy chain was aberrant in some way, possibly incorrectly folded, and therefore the antibody was being degraded internally. In some experiments trace amounts of antibody could be detected in 35S labelling studies.
[0274] As no net antibody was produced, analysis of these constructs was not pursued further. When, however, a combination of the loop choice and the Kabat choice for CDR1 was tested (mouse amino acids 26-35 inclusive) and in which residues 31 (Ser to Arg), 33 (Ala to Thr), and 35 (Tyr to His) were changed from the human residues to the mouse residue and compared to the first series, antibody was produced for gH321, kgH331 and kgH341 when co-expressed with cL.
[0275] Expression was generally low and could not be markedly improved by the insertion of the Kozak consensus sequence 5′ to the ATG of the signal sequence of the gene, as distinct from the case of the gL genes where such insertion led to a 2-5 fold increase in net antibody production. However, only in the case of gH341/mL or kgH341/cL could marginal antigen binding activity be demonstrated. When the kgH341 gene was co-expressed with kgL221A, the net yield of antibody was too low to give a signal above the background level in the antigen binding assay.
[0276] 15.2.2. FRAMEWORK RESIDUES
[0277] As in the case of the light chain the heavy chain frameworks were re-examined. Possibly because of the lower initial homology between the mouse and human heavy variable domains compared to the light chains, more amino acid positions proved to be of interest. Two genes kgH341A and kgH341B were constructed, with 11 or 8 human residues respectively substituted by mouse residues compared to gH341, and with the CDR2 residue 63 returned to the human amino acid potentially to improve domain packing. Both showed antigen binding when combined with cL or kgL221A, the kgH341A gene with all 11 changes appearing to be the superior choice.
[0278] 15.3 INTERIM CONCLUSIONS
[0279] It has been demonstrated, therefore, for OKT3 that the transfer antigen binding ability to the humanised antibody, mouse residues outside the CDR regions defined by the Kabat hypervariability or structural loop choices are required for both the light and heavy chains. Fewer extra residues are needed for the light chain, possibly due to the higher initial homology between the mouse and human kappa variable regions. Of the changes seven (1 and 3 from the light chain and 6, 23, 71, 73 and 76 from the heavy chain) are predicted from a knowledge of other antibody structures to be either partly exposed or on the antibody surface. It has been shown here that residues 1 and 3 in the light chain are not absolutely required to be the mouse sequence; and for the heavy chain the gH341B heavy chain in combination with the 221A light chain generated only weak binding activity. Therefore the presence of the 6 and 23 and 24 changes are important to maintain binding affinity similar to that of murine antibody. It was important, therefore, to further study the individual contribution of the other 8 mouse residues of the kgH341A gene compared to kgH341.
[0280] 16. FURTHER CDR-GRAFTING EXPERIMENTS
[0281] Additional CDR-grafted heavy chain genes were prepared substantially as described above. With reference to Table 2 the further heavy chain genes were based upon the gh341 (plasmid pJA178) and gH341A (plasmid pJA185) with either mouse OKT3 or human KOL residues at 6, 23, 24, 48, 49, 63, 71, 73, 76, 78, 88 and 91, as indicated. The CDR-grafted light chain genes used in these further experiments were gL221, gL221A, gL221B and gL221C as described above.
| TABLE 2 |
|---|
| OKT3 HEAVY CHAIN CDR GRAFTS |
| 1. gH341 and derivatives |
[0282] The CDR-grafted heavy and light chain genes were co-expressed in COS cells either with one another in various combinations but also with the corresponding murine and chimeric heavy and light chain genes substantially as described above. The resultant antibody products were then assayed in binding and blocking assays with HPB-ALL cells as described above.
[0283] The results of the assays for various grafted heavy chains co-expressed with the gL221C light chain are given in FIGS. 7 and 8 (for the JA184, JA185, JA197 and JA198 constructs—see Table 2), in FIG. 9 (for the JA183, JA184, JA185 and JA197 constructs) in FIG. 10 (for the chimeric, JA185, JA199, JA204, JA205, JA207, JA208 and JA209 constructs) and in FIG. 11 (for the JA183, JA184, JA185, JA198, JA203, JA205 and JA206 constructs).
[0284] The basic grafted product without any human to murine changes in the variable frameworks, i.e. gL221 co-expressed with gh341 (JA178), and also the “fully grafted” product, having most human to murine changes in the grafted heavy chain framework, i.e. gL221C co-expressed with gh341A (JA185), were assayed for relative binding affinity in a competition assay against murine OKT3 reference standard, using HPB-ALL cells. The assay used was as described above in section 3.3. The results obtained are given in FIG. 12 for the basic grafted product and in FIG. 13 for the fully grafted product. These results indicate that the basic grafted product has relatively poor binding abiliaty as compared with the OKT3 murine reference standard; whereas the “fully grafted” product has a binding ability very similar to that of the OKT3 murine reference standard.
[0285] The binding and blocking assay results indicate the following:
[0286] The JA198 and JA207 constructs appear to have the best binding characteristics and similar binding abilities, both substantially the same as the chimeric and fully grafted gH341A products. This indicates that positions 88 and 91 and position 76 are not highly critical for maintaining the OKT3 binding ability; whereas at least some of positions 6, 23, 24, 48, 49, 71, 73 and 78 are more important.
[0287] This is borne out by the finding that the JA209 and JA199, although of similar binding ability to one another, are of lower binding ability than the JA198 and JA207 constructs. This indicates the importance of having mouse residues at positions 71, 73 and 78, which are either completely or partially human in the JA199 and JA209 constructs respectively.
[0288] Moreover, on comparing the results obtained for the JA205 and JA183 constructs it is seen that there is a decrease in binding going from the JA205 to the JA183 constructs. This indicates the importance of retaining a mouse residue at position 23, the only position changed between JA205 and JA183.
[0289] These and other results lead us to the conclusion that of the 11 mouse framework residues used in the gH341A (JA185) construct, it is important to retain mouse residues at all of positions 6, 23, 24, 48 and 49, and possibly for maximum affinity at positions 71, 73 and 78.
REFERENCES
[0290] 1. Kohler & Milstein, Nature, 265, 295-497, 1975.
[0291] 2. Verhoeyen et al, Science, 239, 1534-1536, 1988.
[0292] 3. Riechmann et al, Nature, 332, 323-324, 1988.
[0293] 4. Kabat, E. A., Wu, T. T., Reid-Miller, M., Perry, H. M., Gottesman, K. S., 1987, in Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, US Department of Health and Human Services, NIH, USA.
[0294] 5. Wu, T. T., and Kabat, E. A., 1970, J. Exp. Med. 132 211-250.
[0295] 6. Queen et al, (1989), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 10029-10033 and WO 90/07861
[0296] 7. Chatenoud et al, (1986), J. Immunol. 137, 830-838.
[0297] 8. Jeffers et al, (1986), Transplantation, 41, 572-578.
[0298] 9. Maniatis et al, Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1982.
[0299] 10. Primrose and Old, Principles of Gene Manipulation, Blackwell, Oxford, 1980.
[0300] 11. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., Coulson, A. R., 1977, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 74 5463
[0301] 12. Kramer, W., Drutsa, V., Jansen, H. -W., Kramer, B., Plugfelder, M., Fritz, H. -J., 1984, Nucl. Acids Res. 12, 9441
[0302] 13. Whittle, N., Adair, J., Lloyd, J. C., Jenkins, E., Devine, J., Schlom, J., Raubitshek, A., Colcher, D., Bodmer, M., 1987, Protein Engineering 1, 499.
[0303] 14. Bebbington, C. R., Published International Patent Application WO 89/01036.
[0304] 15. Granthan and Perrin 1986, Immunology Today 7, 160.
[0305] 16. Kozak, M., 1987, J. Mol. Biol. 196, 947.
[0306] 17. Jones, T. P., Dear, P. H., Foote, J., Neuberger, M. S., Winter, G., 1986, Nature, 321, 522
Claims
Certificate of Correction present
The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.
What is claimed is:
1. An anti-CD3 antibody molecule comprising:
a CDR-grafted heavy chain wherein, according to the Kabat numbering system, residues 31 to 35, 50 to 65 and 95 to 102 are donor residues; and
a complementary light chain
said CDR-grafted heavy chain having a variable domain comprising predominantly human acceptor antibody heavy chain framework residues and murine donor antibody heavy chain antigen-binding residues, said murine donor antibody having affinity for CD3,
wherein, according to the Kabat numbering system, in said CDR-grafted heavy chain, amino acid residues 23, 24, and 49 at least are additionally donor residues.
2. The antibody molecule of claim 1 wherein amino acid residues 26 to 30 in said CDR-grafted heavy chain are additionally donor residues.
4. The antibody molecule of claim 1 wherein at least one of amino acid residues 1, 3, and 76 in said CDR-grafted heavy chain is additionally a donor residue.
5. The antibody molecule of claim 1 wherein at least one of amino acid residues 36, if not a tryptophan, 94, if not an arginine, 104 and 106, if not glycines, and 107, if not a threonine, in said CDR-grafted heavy chain are additionally donor residues.
6. The antibody molecule of claim 5 wherein at least one of amino acid residues 2, 4, 6, 38, 48, 67, and 69 in said CDR-grafted heavy chain is additionally a donor residue.
7. The antibody molecule of claim 1 wherein said complementary light chain is a CDR-grafted light chain wherein, according to the Kabat numbering system, residues 24 to 34, 50 to 56 and 89 to 97 are donor residues, said CDR-grafted light chain having a variable domain comprising predominantly human acceptor antibody light chain framework residues and murine donor antibody light chain antigen-binding residues, said murine donor antibody having affinity for CD3, wherein, according to the Kabat numbering system, in said CDR-grafted light chain, amino acid residues 46, 48, 58 and 71 at least are donor residues.
8. A therapeutic or diagnostic composition comprising the antibody molecule of claim 1 in combination with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, diluent or excipient.
9. An anti-CD3 antibody molecule comprising
a CDR-grafted heavy chain wherein, according to the Kabat numbering system, residues 26 to 35, 50 to 65 and 95 to 102 are donor residues; and
a complementary light chain
said CDR-grafted heavy chain having a variable domain comprising predominantly human acceptor antibody heavy chain framework residues and murine donor antibody heavy chain antigen-binding residues, said murine donor antibody having affinity for CD3, wherein, according to the Kabat numbering system, in said CDR-grafted heavy chain, amino acid residues 23, 24, and 49 at least are additionally donor residues.
Patent Citations (22)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US5530101(A) | 1996-06-01 | Queen et al. | Applicant |
| US5585089(A) | 1996-12-01 | Queen et al. | Applicant |
| US5859205(A) | 1999-01-01 | Adair et al. | Examiner |
| US5929212(A) | 1999-07-01 | Jolliffe et al. | Applicant |
| EP120694 | 1984-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP125023 | 1984-11-01 | Applicant | |
| EP171496 | 1986-02-01 | Applicant | |
| EP173494 | 1986-03-01 | Applicant | |
| EP239400 | 1987-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EP328404 | 1989-08-01 | Applicant | |
| EP365209 | 1990-04-01 | Applicant | |
| EP403156 | 1990-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO86/01533 | 1986-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO89/01036 | 1989-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO89/07452 | 1989-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO90/07861 | 1990-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO91/09668 | 1991-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO91/09967 | 1991-07-01 | Examiner | |
| WO92/04381 | 1992-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO92/11018 | 1992-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO92/15683 | 1992-09-01 | Applicant | |
| WO92/16553 | 1992-10-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (50)
- Abaza et al J. Protein Chemistry 11(5):433-444 1992.Applicant
- Roberts, et al., “Generation of antibody with enhanced affinity and specificity for its antigen by protein engineering,” Nature, 1987 328(20), 731-734.Applicant
- Verhoeyen, et al., “Reshaping human antibodies: grafting an antilyxozyme activity,” Science, 1988, 239, 1534-1536.Applicant
- Cunningham, et al., “Antibody engineering—how to be human,” TIBTECH, 1992, 10, 2 pp.Applicant
- Dillman, R.O., “Monoclonal antibodies for treating cancer,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 1989, 111, 592-603.Applicant
- Harris, et al., “Therapeutic antibodies—the come of age,” TIBTECH, 1993 11, 42-46.Applicant
- Hird, V., “Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies,” Genes and Cancer, 1990, Carney, D., et al. (eds.), Chapter 17, 183-189.Applicant
- Jaffers, G.J., et al., “Monoclonal antibody therapy,” Transplantation1986, 41 (5), 572-578.Applicant
- Kettleborough, C.A., et al., “Humanization of a mouse monoclonal antibody by CDR-grafting: the importance of framework resides in loop conformation,” Protein Engineering, 1991, 4(7), 773-783.Applicant
- Levitt, M., et al., “Molecular dynamics of native protein,” JMP, 1983, 168, 595-620.Applicant
- Osband, M.E., et al., “Problems in the investigational study and clinical use of cancer immunotherapy,” Immunology Today, 1990, 11(6), 193-195.Applicant
- Queen, M., et al., “A humanized antibody that binds to the interleukin 2 receptor,” PNAS, 1989, 86, 10029-10033.Applicant
- Reichmann, L., et al., “Reshaping human antibodies for therapy,” Nature, 1988, 332, 323-327.Applicant
- Smith, et al., “Antibodies to CD3/T-cell receptor complex induce death by apoptosis in immature T cells in thymic cultures,” Nature, 1989, 337, 181-185.Applicant
- Waldmann, T.A., “Monoclonal antibodies in diagnosis and therapy,” Science, 1991, 252, 1657-1662.Applicant
- Amit, A.G., et al., “Three-dimensional structure of an antigen-antibody complex at 2.8 Å Resolution,” Research Articles, 1986, 747-753.Applicant
- Begent, R.H.J., et al., “Phase I/II study of chimeric B72-3 antibody in radioimmunotherapy of culorectal carcinoma,” J. Cancer Res. And Cancer Phy., 1990, 62, 487.Applicant
- Bruccoleri, R.E., et al., “Structure of antibody hypervariable loops reproduced by a conformational search algorithm,” Nature, 1988, 335(6), 564-568.Applicant
- Chatenoud, et al., “Restriction of the human in vivo immune response against the mousemonoclonal antibody OKT31” J. Immunol., 1986, 137, 830-838.Applicant
- Chothia, C., et al., “Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions,” Nature, 1989, 342, 877-883.Applicant
- Chothia, C., et al., “The predicted structure of immunoglobulin D1.3 and its comparison with the crystal structure,” Science, 1986, 233, 755-758.Applicant
- Chothia, C., et al., “Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins,” J. Mol. Biol., 1987, 196, 901-917.Applicant
- Davies, D.R., et al., “Structural basis of antibody function,” Ann. Rev. Immunol., 1983, 1, 87-117.Applicant
- Davies, D.R., et al., “Antibody-antigen complexes,” Ann. Rev. Biochem., 1990, 59, 439-473.Applicant
- de la Paz, P., et al., “Modelling of the combining sites of three anti-lysozyme monoclonal antibodies and the complex between one of the antibodies and its epitope,” J. EMBO, 1986, 5(2), 415-425.Applicant
- Dwek, R.A., et al., “Structure of an antibody combining site by magnetic resonance,” Nature, 1977, 266, 31-37.Applicant
- Elliott, M., et al., “Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with chimeric monoclonal antibodies to tumor necrosis factor α,” Arthritis & Rheumatoid, 1993, 36, 1681-1690.Applicant
- Getzoff, E.D., et al., “The chemistry and mechanism of antibody binding to protein antigens,” Advances in Immunology, 1988, 43, 1-98.Applicant
- Gillies, S.D., et al., “Antigen binding and biological activities of engineered mutant chimeric antibodies with human tumor specificities,” Hum. Antibod. Hybridomas, 1990, 1(1), 47-54.Applicant
- Grantham, et al., “Codon usage in the immune system,” Immunology Today, 1986, 7(6), 160-163.Applicant
- Jones, et al., “Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse,” Nature, 1986, 321, 522-525.Applicant
- Junghans, et al., “Anti-Tac-H, a humanized antibody to the interleukin 2 receptor with new features for immunotherapy in malignant and immune disorders,” Cancer Research, 1990, 50, 1495-1502.Applicant
- Kohler, et al., “Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity,” Nature, 1975, 256, 494-497.Applicant
- Kozak, M., “At least six nucleotides preceding the AUG initiator codon enhance translation in mammalian cell,” J. Mol. Biol., 1987, 196, 947-950.Applicant
- Kramer, et al., “The gapped duplex DNA approach to oligonucleotide-directed mutation construction,” Nucl. Acids Res., 1984, 12, 9441-9456.Applicant
- Levitt, M., “Molecular dynamics of native protein, II. Analysis and nature of motion,” J. Mol. Biol., 1983, 168, 621-657.Applicant
- Levitt, M., “Protein folding by restrained energy minimization and molecular dynamics,” J. Mol. Biol., 1983, 170, 723-764.Applicant
- Levitt, M., et al., “Accurate simulation of protein dynamics in solution,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1988, 85, 7557-7561.Applicant
- Levy, R., et al., “Probing antibody diversity by 2D NMR: comparison of amino acid sequences, predicted structures, and observed antibody-antigen interactions in complexes of two antipeptide antibodies,” Biochemistry, 1989, 28(7), 7168-7175.Applicant
- Neuberger, M.S., et al., “Recombinant antibodies possessing novel effector functions,” Nature, 1984, 312, 604-608.Applicant
- Neuberger, M.S., “A hapten-specific chimaeric IgE antibody with human physiological effector function,” Nature, 1985, 268-270.Applicant
- Norman, D.J., et al., “Reversal of acute allograft rejection with monoclonal antibody,” Transplantation Proceeding, 1985, XVII(1), 39-41Applicant
- Padlan, E.A., et al., “Structure of an antibody-antigen complex: crystal structure of the HyHEL-10 Fab-lysozyme complex,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1989, 86, 5938-5942Applicant
- Padlan, E.A., et al., “Model-building studies of antigen-binding sites: the hapten-binding site of MOPC-315,” Lab. Mole. Biol., 627-637.Applicant
- Padlan, E.A., “Model-building study of the combining sites of two antibodies to α(1→6) dextran,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1988, 85, 6885-6889.Applicant
- Sanger, et al., “DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1977, 74, 5463-5467.Applicant
- Smith-Gill, S.J., et al., “A three-dimensional model of an anti-lysozyme antibody,” J. Mol. Biol., 1987, 194, 713-724.Applicant
- Whittle, et al., “Expression in COS cells of a mouse—human chimaeric B72.3,” Protein Engineering, 1987, 1(6), 499-187.Applicant
- Wu, T.T., et al., “An analysis of the sequences of the variable regions of bence jones proteins and myeloma light chains and their implications for anti-body complementarity,” J. Exp. Med., 1970, 132, 211-250.Applicant
- Zilber, B., et al., “NMR-Derived model for a peptide-antibody complex,” Biochemistry, 1990, 29, 10032-10041.Applicant