US 6,737,508 B1Grant
DNA sequences from staphylococus aureus bacteriophages 3A, 77, and 96 that encode anti-microbial polypeptides
Issue Date:2004-05-18
•11 Claims
•18 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
The disclosure concerns particular bacteriophage open reading frames, and portions and products of those open reading frames which have antimicrobial activity. Methods of using such products are also described.
Metadata
Inventors
- Jerry Pelletier
- Philippe Gros
- Michael DuBow
Application Information
Application Number:US 09/676,519
Filing Date:2000-09-28
Priority Date:1998-12-03
Art Unit:7
Classifications
IPC:
C07K 700A61K 3804A61K 3816
Field of Search:
530350530324530326435 5435883
Patent Drawings (18 sheets)
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0002] This application is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/407,804 filed Sep. 28, 1999, entitled DNA SEQUENCES FROM STAPHYLOCCUS AUREUSBACTERIOPHAGE 77 THAT ENCODE ANTI-MICROBIAL POLYPEPTIDES, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/110,992 filed Dec. 3, 1998 entitled DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS BASED ON BACTERIOPHAGE GENOMICS, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, including drawings.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] This invention relates to the identification of antimicrobial agents and of microbial targets of such agents, and in particular to the isolation of bacteriophage DNA sequences, and their translated protein products, showing anti-microbial activity. The DNA sequences can be expressed in expression vectors. These expression constructs and the proteins produced therefrom can be used for a variety of purposes including therapeutic methods and identification of microbial targets.
[0004] The following description is provided to assist the understanding of the reader. None of the information provided or references cited is admitted to be prior art to the present invention.
[0005] The frequency and spectrum of antibiotic-resistant infections have, in recent years, increased in both the hospital and community. Certain infections have become essentially untreatable and are growing to epidemic proportions in the developing world as well as in institutional settings in the developed world. The staggering spread of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria has been attributed to microbial genetic characteristics, widespread use of antibiotic drugs and changes in society that enhance the transmission of drug-resistant organisms (for a review, see Cohen, 1992). This spread of drug resistant microbes is leading to ever-increasing morbidity, mortality and health-care costs.
[0006] There are over 160 antibiotics currently available for treatment of microbial infections, all based on a few basic chemical structures and targeting a small number of metabolic pathways: bacterial cell wall synthesis, protein synthesis, and DNA replication. Despite all these antibiotics, a person could succumb to an infection as a result of a resistant bacterial infection. Resistance now reaches all classes of antibiotics currently in use, including: β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, macrolide peptides, chloramphenicol, tetracyclines, rifampicin, folate inhibitors, glycopeptides, and mupirocin. There is thus a need for new antibiotics, and this need will not subside given the ability bacteria have to overcome each new agent synthesized. It is also likely that targeting new pathways will play an important role in discovery of these new antibiotics. In fact, a number of crucial cellular pathways, such as secretion, cell division, and many metabolic functions, remain untargeted today.
[0007] Most major pharmaceutical companies have on-going drug discovery programs for novel anti-microbials. These are based on screens for small molecule inhibitors (e.g., natural products, bacterial culture media, libraries of small molecules, combinatorial chemistry) of crucial metabolic pathways of the micro-organism of interest. The screening process is largely for cytotoxic compounds and in most cases is not based on a known mechanism of action of the compounds. Classical drug screening programs are being exhausted and many of these pharmaceutical companies are looking towards rational drug design programs. Several small to mid-size biotechnology companies, as well as large pharmaceutical companies, have developed systematic high-throughput sequencing programs to decipher the genetic code of specific micro-organisms of interest. The goal is to identify, through sequencing, unique biochemical pathways or intermediates that are unique to the microorganism. Knowledge of the function of these bacterial genes, may form the rationale for a drug discovery program based on the mechanism of action of the identified enzymes/proteins. However, one of the most critical steps in this approach is the ascertainment that the identified proteins and biochemical pathways are 1) non-redundant and essential for bacterial survival, and 2) constitute suitable and accessible targets for drug discovery. These two issues are not easily addressed since to date, 18 prokaryotic genomes have been sequenced and 200 sequenced genomes are expected by the year 2000. For a majority of the sequenced genomes, less than 50% of the open reading frames (ORFs) have been linked to a known function. Even with the genome of Escherichia coli(E. coli), the most extensively studied bacterium, less than two-thirds of the annotated protein coding genes showed significant similarity to genes with ascribed functions (Rusterholtz and Pohlschroder, 1999). Thus considerable work must be undertaken to identify appropriate bacterial targets for drug screening.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] The present invention is based on the identification of, and demonstration that, specific DNA sequences of a bacteriophage, when introduced into a host bacterium can kill, or inhibit growth, of the host. Thus, these DNA sequences are anti-microbial agents. Information based on these DNA sequences can be utilized to develop peptide mimetics that can also function as anti-microbials. The identification of the host bacterial proteins, targeted by the anti-microbial bacteriophage DNA sequences, can provide novel targets for drug design and compound screening.
[0009] In this regard, the terms “inhibit”, “inhibition”, “inhibitory”, and “inhibitor” all refer to a function of reducing a biological activity or function. Such reduction in activity or function can, for example, be in connection with a cellular component (e.g., an enzyme), or in connection with a cellular process (e.g., synthesis of a particular protein), or in connection with an overall process of a cell (e.g., cell growth). In reference to cell growth, the inhibitory effects may be bactericidal (killing of bacterial cells) or bacteriostatic (i.e., stopping or at least slowing bacterial cell growth). The latter slows or prevents cell growth such that fewer cells of the strain are produced relative to uninhibited cells over a given time period. From a molecular standpoint, such inhibition may equate with a reduction in the level of, or elimination of, the transcription and/or translation of a specific bacterial target(s), or reduction or elimination of activity of a particular target biomolecule.
[0010] In a first aspect the invention provides methods for identifying a target for antibacterial agents by identifying the bacterial target(s) of at least one inhibitory gene product, e.g., protein from ORFs 33, 41, 79 of bacteriophage 3A, ORF 1 of bacteriophage 77 and ORFs 48, 78, 100 of bacteriophage 96 or a homologous product. Such identification allows the development of antibacterial agents active on such targets. Preferred embodiments for identifying such targets involve the identification of binding of target and phage ORF products to one another. The target molecule may be a bacterial protein or other bacterial biomolecule, e.g., a nucleotprotein, a nucleic acid, a lipid or lipid-containing molecule, a nucleoside or nucleoside derivative, a polysaccharide or polysaccharide-containing molecule, or a peptidoglycan. The phage ORF products may be subportions of a larger ORF product that also binds the host target. Exemplary approaches are described below in the Detailed Description.
[0011] Additionally, the invention provides methods for identifying targets for antibacterial agents by identifying homologs of a Staphylococcus aureustarget of a bacteriophage 3A ORF product, for example, ORFs 33, 41 or 79, bacteriophage 77 ORF product, such as for example, ORF 1 or bacteriophage 96 ORF products, such as for example, ORFs 48, 78, or 100 product. Such homologs may be utilized in the various aspects and embodiments described herein.
[0012] The term “fragment” refers to a portion of a larger molecule or assembly. For proteins, the term “fragment” refers to a molecule which includes at least 5 contiguous amino acids from the reference polypeptide or protein, preferably at least 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30, 50 or more contiguous amino acids. In connection with oligo- or polynucleotides, the term “fragment” refers to a molecule which includes at least 15 contiguous nucleotides from a reference polynucleotide, preferably at least 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 45, 60, 90, 150, or more contiguous nucleotides. Also in preferred embodiments, the fragment has a length in a range with the minimum as described above and a maximum which is no more than 90% of the length (or contains that percent of the contiguous amino acids or nucleotides) of the larger molecule (e.g., of the specified ORF), in other embodiments, the upper limit is no more than 60, 70, or 80% of the length of the larger molecule.
[0013] Stating that an agent or compound is “active on” a particular cellular target, such as the product of a particular gene, means that the target is an important part of a cellular pathway which includes that target and that the agent acts on that pathway. Thus, in some cases the agent may act on a component upstream or downstream of the stated target, including a regulator of that pathway or a component of that pathway. In general, an antibacterial agent is active on an essential cellular function, often on a product of an essential gene.
[0014] By “essential”, in connection with a gene or gene product, is meant that the host cannot survive without, or is significantly growth compromised, in the absence or depletion of functional product. An “essential gene” is thus one that encodes a product that is beneficial, or preferably necessary, for cellular growth in vitro in a medium appropriate for growth of a strain having a wild-type allele corresponding to the particular gene in question. Therefore, if an essential gene is inactivated or inhibited, that cell will grow significantly more slowly or even not at all. Preferably growth of a strain in which such a gene has been inactivated will be less than 20%, more preferably less than 10%, most preferably less than 5% of the growth rate of the wild-type, or not at all, in the growth medium. Preferably, in the absence of activity provided by a product of the gene, the cell will not grow at all or will be non-viable, at least under culture conditions similar to normal in vivo growth conditions. For example, absence of the biological activity of certain enzymes involved in bacterial cell wall synthesis can result in the lysis of cells under normal osmotic conditions, even though protoplasts can be maintained under controlled osmotic conditions. Preferably, but not necessarily, if such a gene is inhibited, e.g., with an antibacterial agent or a phage product, the growth rate of the inhibited bacteria will be less than 50%, more preferably less than 30%, still more preferably less than 20%, and most preferably less than 10% of the growth rate of the uninhibited bacteria. As recognized by those skilled in the art, the degree of growth inhibition will generally depend on the concentration of the inhibitory agent. In the context of the invention, essential genes are generally the preferred targets of antimicrobial agents. Essential genes can encode target molecules directly or can encode a product involved in the production, modification, or maintenance of a target molecule.
[0015] A “target” refers to a biomolecule that can be acted on by an exogenous agent, thereby modulating, preferably inhibiting, growth or viability of a cell. In most cases such a target will be a nucleic acid sequence or molecule, or a polypeptide or protein. However, other types of biomolecules can also be targets, e.g., membrane lipids and cell wall structural components.
[0016] The term “bacterium” refers to a single bacterial strain, and includes a single cell, and a plurality or population of cells of that strain unless clearly indicated to the contrary. In reference to bacteria or bacteriophage, the term “strain” refers to bacteria or phage having a particular genetic content. The genetic content includes genomic content as well as recombinant vectors. Thus, for example, two otherwise identical bacterial cells would represent different strains if each contained a vector, e.g., a plasmid, with different phage ORF inserts.
[0017] In the context of the phage nucleic acid sequences, e.g., gene sequences, of this invention, the terms “homolog” and “homologous” denote nucleotide sequences from different bacteria or phage strains or species or from other types of organisms that have significantly related nucleotide sequences, and consequently significantly related encoded gene products, preferably having related function. Homologous gene sequences or coding sequences have at least 70% sequence identity (as defined by the maximal base match in a computer-generated alignment of two or more nucleic acid sequences) over at least one sequence window of 48 nucleotides (or at least 99, 150, 200, or even the entire ORF or other sequence of interest), more preferably at least 80 or 85%, still more preferably at least 90%, and most preferably at least 95%. The polypeptide products of homologous genes have at least 35% amino acid sequence identity over at least one sequence window of 18 amino acid residues (or 24, 30, 33, 50, 100, or an entire polypeptide), more preferably at least 40%, still more preferably at least 50% or 60%, and most preferably at least 70%, 80%, or 90%. Preferably, the homologous gene product is also a functional homolog, meaning that the homolog will functionally complement one or more biological activities of the product being compared. For nucleotide or amino acid sequence comparisons where a homology is defined by a % sequence identity, the percentage is determined using BLAST programs (with default parameters (Altschul et al., 1997, “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs, Nucleic Acid Res. 25:3389-3402). Any of a variety of algorithms known in the art which provide comparable results can also be used, preferably using default parameters. Performance characteristics for three different algorithms in homology searching is described in Salamov et al., 1999, “Combining sensitive database searches with multiple intermediates to detect distant homologues.” Protein Eng. 12:95-100. Another exemplary program package is the GCG™ package from the University of Wisconsin.
[0018] Homologs may also or in addition be characterized by the ability of two complementary nucleic acid strands to hybridize to each other under appropriately stringent conditions. Hybridizations are typically and preferably conducted with probe-length nucleic acid molecules, preferably 20-100 nucleotides in length. Those skilled in the art understand how to estimate and adjust the stringency of hybridization conditions such that sequences having at least a desired level of complementarity will stably hybridize, while those having lower complementarity will not. For examples of hybridization conditions and parameters, see, e.g.,. Maniatis, T. et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor University Press, Cold Spring, N.Y.; Ausubel, F. M. et al. (1994) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Secaucus, N.J. Homologs and homologous gene sequences may thus be identified using any nucleic acid sequence of interest, including the phage ORFs and bacterial target genes of the present invention.
[0019] A typical hybridization, for example, utilizes, besides the labeled probe of interest, a salt solution such as 6×SSC (NaCl and Sodium Citrate base) to stabilize nucleic acid strand interaction, a mild detergent such as 0.5% SDS, together with other typical additives such as Denhardt's solution and salmon sperm DNA. The solution is added to the immobilized sequence to be probed and incubated at suitable temperatures to preferably permit specific binding while minimizing non-specific binding. The temperature of the incubations and ensuing washes is critical to the success and clarity of the hybridization. Stringent conditions employ relatively higher temperatures, lower salt concentrations, and/or more detergent than do non-stringent conditions. Hybridization temperatures also depend on the length, complementarity level, and nature (i.e., “GC content”) of the sequences to be tested. Typical stringent hybridizations and washes are conducted at temperatures of at least 40° C., while lower stringency hybridizations and washes are typically conducted at 37° C. down to room temperature (˜25° C.). One of ordinary skill in the art is aware that these conditions may vary according to the parameters indicated above, and that certain additives such as formamide and dextran sulphate may also be added to affect the conditions.
[0020] By “stringent hybridization conditions” is meant hybridization conditions at least as stringent as the following: hybridization in 50% formamide, 5×SSC, 50 mM NaH2PO4, pH 6.8, 0.5% SDS, 0.1 mg/mL sonicated salmon sperm DNA, and 5×Denhart's solution at 42° C. overnight; washing with 2×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 45° C.; and washing with 0.2×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 45° C. In another example, stringent hybridization conditions should not allow for hybridization of two nucleic acids which differ over a stretch of 20 contiguous nucleotides by more than two bases.
[0021] Homologous nucleotide sequences will distinguishably hybridize with a reference sequence with up to three mismatches in ten (i.e., at least 70% base match in two sequences of equal length). Preferably, the allowable mismatch level is up to two mismatches in 10, or up to one mismatch in ten, more preferably up to one mismatch in twenty. (Those ratios can, of course, be applied to larger sequences.)
[0022] Preferred embodiments involve identification of binding between ORF product and bacterial cellular component that include methods for distinguishing bound molecules, for example, affinity chromatography, immunoprecipitation, crosslinking, and/or genetic screen methods that permit protein:protein interactions to be monitored. One of skill in the art is familiar with these techniques and common materials utilized (see, e.g., Coligan, J. et al. (eds.) (1995) Current Protocols in Protein Science, John Wiley & Sons, Secaucus, N.J.).
[0023] Genetic screening for the identification of protein:protein interactions typically involves the co-introduction of both a chimeric bait nucleic acid sequence (here, the phage ORF to be tested) and a chimeric target nucleic acid sequence that, when co-expressed and having affinity for one another in a host cell, stimulate reporter gene expression to indicate the relationship. A “positive” can thus suggest a potential inhibitory effect in bacteria. This is discussed in further detail in the Detailed Description section below. In this way, new bacterial targets can be identified that are inhibited by specific phage ORF products or derivatives, fragments, mimetics, or other molecules.
[0024] Other embodiments involve the identification and/or utilization of a target which is mutated at the site of phage 3A, 77 or 96 protein interaction but still functional in the cell by virtue of their host's relatively unresponsive nature in the presence of expression of ORFs previously identified as inhibitory to the non-mutant or wild-type strain. Such mutants have the effect of protecting the host from an inhibition that would otherwise occur by, for example, competing for binding with the phage ORF product and indirectly allow identification of the precise responsible target. The identified target can then be used for, for example, follow-up studies and anti-microbial development. In certain embodiments, rescue and/or protection from inhibition occurs under conditions in which a bacterial target or mutant target is highly expressed. This is performed, for example, through coupling of the sequence with regulatory element promoters, as known in the art, which regulate expression at levels higher than wild-type at, for example, a level sufficiently higher than the inhibitor can be competitively bound to the highly expressed target such that the bacterium is detectably less inhibited.
[0025] Identification of the bacterial target can involve identification of a phage-specific site of action. This can involve a newly identified target, or a target where the phage site of action differs from the site of action of a previously known antibacterial agent or inhibitor. For example, phage T7 genes 0.7 and 2.0 target the host RNA polymerase, which is also the cellular target for the antibacterial agent, rifampin. To the extent that a phage product is found to act at a different site than previously described inhibitors, aspects of the present invention can utilize those new, phage-specific sites for identification and use of new agents. The site of action can be identified by techniques known to those skilled in the art, for example, by mutational analysis, binding competition analysis, and/or other appropriate techniques.
[0026] Once a bacterial host target or mutant target sequence has been identified, it too can be conveniently sequenced, sequence analyzed (e.g., by computer), and the underlying gene(s), and corresponding translated product(s) further characterized. Preferred embodiments include such analysis and identification. Preferably such a target has not previously been identified as an appropriate target for antibacterial action.
[0027] Also in preferred embodiments in which the bacterial target is a polypeptide or nucleic acid molecule, the identification of a bacterial target of a phage ORF product or fragment includes identification of a cellular and/or biochemical function of the bacterial target. As understood by those skilled in the art, this can, for example, include identification of function by identification of homologous polypeptides or nucleic acid molecules having known function, or identification of the presence of known motifs or sequences corresponding to known function. Such identifications can be readily performed using sequence comparison computer software, such as the BLAST programs and similar other programs and sequence and motif databases.
[0028] In embodiments involving expression of a phage ORF in a bacterial strain, in preferred embodiments that expression is inducible. By “inducible” is meant that expression is absent or occurs at a low level until the occurrence of an appropriate environmental stimulus provides otherwise. For the present invention such induction is preferably controlled by an artificial environmental change, such as by contacting a bacterial strain population with an inducing compound (i.e., an inducer). However, induction could also occur, for example, in response to build-up of a compound produced by the bacteria in the bacterial culture, e.g., in the medium. As uncontrolled or constitutive expression of inhibitory ORFs can severely compromise bacteria to the point of eradication, such expression is therefore undesirable in many cases because it would prevent effective evaluation of the strain and inhibitor being studied. For example, such uncontrolled expression could prevent any growth of the strain following insertion of a recombinant ORF, thus preventing determination of effective transfection or transformation. A controlled or inducible expression is therefore advantageous and is generally provided through the provision of suitable regulatory elements, e.g., promoter/operator sequences that can be conveniently transcriptionally linked to a coding sequence to be evaluated. In most cases, the vector will also contain sequences suitable for efficient replication of the vector in the same or different host cells and/or sequences allowing selection of cells containing the vector, i.e., “selectable markers.” Further, preferred vectors include convenient primer sequences flanking the cloning region from which PCR and/or sequencing may be performed. In preferred embodiments where the purification of phage product is desired, preferably the bacterium or other cell type does not produce a target for the inhibitory product, or is otherwise resistant to the inhibitory product.
[0029] In preferred embodiments, the target of the phage ORF product or fragment is identified from a bacterial animal pathogen, preferably a mammalian pathogen, more preferably a human pathogen, and is preferably a gene or gene product of such a pathogen. Also in preferred embodiments, the target is a gene or gene product, where the sequence of the target is homologous to a gene or gene product from such a pathogen as identified above.
[0030] As used herein, the term “mammal” has its usual biological meaning, and particularly includes bovines, swine, dogs, cats, and humans.
[0031] Other aspects of the invention provide isolated, purified, or enriched specific phage nucleic acid and amino acid sequences, subsequences, and homologs thereof from or corresponding to ORFs 33, 41 and 79 from bacteriophage 3A, ORF 1 from bacteriophage 77 or ORFs 48, 78 and 100 from bacteriophage 96 (Staphylococcus aureushost bacterium). Such nucleotide sequences are at least 15 nucleotides in length, preferably at least 18, 21, 24, or 27 nucleotides in length, more preferably at least 30, 50, or 90 nucleotides in length. In certain embodiments, longer nucleic acids are preferred, for example those of at least 120, 150, 200, 300, 600, 900 or more nucleotides. Such sequences can, for example, be amplification oligonucleotides (e.g., PCR primers), oligonucleotide probes, sequences encoding a portion or all of a phage-encoded protein, or a fragment or all of a phage-encoded protein. In preferred embodiments, the nucleic acid sequence or amino acid sequence contains a sequence which has a lower length as specified above, and an upper-length limit which is no more than 50, 60, 70, 80, or 90% of the length of the full-length ORF or ORF product. The upper-length limit can also be expressed in terms of the number of base pairs of the ORF (coding region).
[0032] As it is recognized that alternate codons will encode the same amino acid for most amino acids due to the degeneracy of the genetic code, the sequences of this aspect includes nucleic acid sequences utilizing such alternate codon usage for one or more codons of a coding sequence. For example, all four nucleic acid sequences GCT, GCC, GCA, and GCG encode the amino acid, alanine. Therefore, if for an amino acid there exists an average of three codons, a polypeptide of 100 amino acids in length will, on average, be encoded by 3100, or 5×1047, nucleic acid sequences. Thus, a nucleic acid sequence can be modified (e.g., a nucleic acid sequence from a phage as specified above) to form a second nucleic acid sequence encoding the same polypeptide as encoded by the first nucleic acid sequence using routine procedures and without undue experimentation. Thus, all possible nucleic acid sequences that encode the amino acid sequences encoded by the phage 3A ORFs 33, 41, and 79, the phage 77 ORF 1 and the phage 96 ORF 48, 78 and 100 as if all were written out in full, taking into account the codon usage, especially that preferred in the host bacterium.
[0033] The alternate codon descriptions are available in common textbooks, for example, Stryer, BIOCHEMISTRY 3rded., and Lehninger, BIOCHEMISTRY 3rded. Codon preference tables for various types of organisms are available in the literature. Because of the number of sequence variations involving alternate codon usage, for the sake of brevity, individual sequences are not separately listed herein. Instead the alternate sequences are described by reference to the natural sequence with replacement of one or more (up to all) of the degenerate codons with alternate codons from the alternate codon table (Table 2), preferably with selection according to preferred codon usage for the normal host organism or a host organism in which a sequence is intended to be expressed. Those skilled in the art also understand how to alter the alternate codons to be used for expression in organisms where certain codons code differently than shown in the “universal” codon table.
[0034] For amino acid sequences, sequences contain at least 5 peptide-linked amino acid residues, and preferably at least 6, 7, 10, 15, 20, 30, or 40, amino acids having identical amino acid sequence as the same number of contiguous amino acid residues in a phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, or phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 product. In some cases longer sequences may be preferred, for example, those of at least 50, 70, or 100 amino acids in length. In preferred embodiments, the sequence has bacteria-inhibiting function when expressed or otherwise present in a bacterial cell which is a host for the bacteriophage from which the sequence was derived.
[0035] By “isolated” in reference to a nucleic acid is meant that a naturally occurring sequence has been removed from its normal cellular (e.g., chromosomal) environment or is synthesized in a non-natural environment (e.g., artificially synthesized). Thus, the sequence may be in a cell-free solution or placed in a different cellular environment. The term does not imply that the sequence is the only nucleotide chain present, but that it is essentially free (about 90-95% pure at least) of non-nucleotide material naturally associated with it, and thus is distinguished from isolated chromosomes.
[0036] The term “enriched” means that the specific DNA or RNA sequence constitutes a significantly higher fraction (2-5 fold) of the total DNA or RNA present in the cells or solution of interest than in normal or diseased cells or in cells from which the sequence was originally taken. This could be caused by a person by preferential reduction in the amount of other DNA or RNA present, or by a preferential increase in the amount of the specific DNA or RNA sequence, or by a combination of the two. However, it should be noted that enriched does not imply that there are no other DNA or RNA sequences present, just that the relative amount of the sequence of interest has been significantly increased.
[0037] The term “significant” is used to indicate that the level of increase is useful to the person making such an increase and an increase relative to other nucleic acids of about at least 2-fold, more preferably at least 5- to 10-fold or even more. The term also does not imply that there is no DNA or RNA from other sources. The other source DNA may, for example, comprise DNA from a yeast or bacterial genome, or a cloning vector such as pUC19. This term distinguishes from naturally occurring events, such as viral infection, or tumor type growths, in which the level of one mRNA may be naturally increased relative to other species of mRNA. That is, the term is meant to cover only those situations in which a person has intervened to elevate the proportion of the desired nucleic acid.
[0038] It is also advantageous for some purposes that a nucleotide sequence be in purified form. The term “purified” in reference to nucleic acid does not require absolute purity (such as a homogeneous preparation). Instead, it represents an indication that the sequence is relatively more pure than in the natural environment (compared to the natural level, this level should be at least 2-5 fold greater, e.g., in terms of mg/mL). Individual clones isolated from a genomic or cDNA library may be purified to electrophoretic homogeneity. The claimed DNA molecules obtained from these clones could be obtained directly from total DNA or from total RNA. cDNA clones are not naturally occurring, but rather are preferably obtained via manipulation of a partially purified naturally occurring substance (messenger RNA). The construction of a cDNA library from mRNA involves the creation of a synthetic substance (cDNA) and pure individual cDNA clones can be isolated from the synthetic library by clonal selection of the cells carrying the cDNA library. Thus, the process which includes the construction of a cDNA library from mRNA and isolation of distinct cDNA clones yields an approximately 106-fold purification of the native message. Thus, purification of at least one order of magnitude, preferably two or three orders, and more preferably four or five orders of magnitude is expressly contemplated. A genomic library can be used in the same way and yields the same approximate levels of purification.
[0039] The terms “isolated”, “enriched”, and “purified” with respect to the nucleic acids, above, may similarly be used to denote the relative purity and abundance of polypeptides (multimers of amino acids joined one to another by α-carboxyl:α-amino group (peptide) bonds). These, too, may be stored in, grown in, screened in, and selected from libraries using biochemical techniques familiar in the art. Such polypeptides may be natural, synthetic or chimeric and may be extracted using any of a variety of methods, such as antibody immunoprecipitation, other “tagging” techniques, conventional chromatography and/or electrophoretic methods. Some of the above utilize the corresponding nucleic acid sequence.
[0040] As indicated above, aspects and embodiments of the invention are not limited to entire genes and proteins. The invention also provides and utilizes fragments and portions thereof, preferably those which are “active” in the inhibitory sense described above. Such peptides or oligopeptides and oligo or polynucleotides have preferred lengths as specified above for nucleic acid and amino acid sequences from phage; corresponding recombinant constructs can be made to express the encoded same. Also included are homologous sequences and fragments thereof.
[0041] The nucleotide and amino acid sequences identified herein are believed to be correct, however, certain sequences may contain a small percentage of errors, e.g., 1-5%. In the event that any of the sequences have errors, the corrected sequences can be readily provided by one skilled in the art using routine methods. For example, the nucleotide sequences can be confirmed or corrected by obtaining and culturing the relevant phage, and purifying phage genomic nucleic acids. A region or regions of interest can be amplified, e.g., by PCR from the appropriate genomic template, using primers based on the described sequence. The amplified regions can then be sequenced using any of the available methods (e.g., a dideoxy termination method, for example, using commercially available products). This can be done redundantly to provide the corrected sequence or to confirm that the described sequence is correct. Alternatively, a particular sequence or sequences can be identified and isolated as an insert or inserts in a phage genomic library and isolated, amplified, and sequenced by standard methods. Confirmation or correction of a nucleotide sequence for a phage gene provides an amino acid sequence of the encoded product by merely reading off the amino acid sequence according to the normal codon relationships and/or expressed in a standard expression system and the polypeptide product sequenced by standard techniques. The sequences described herein thus provide unique identification of the corresponding genes and other sequences, allowing those sequences to be used in the various aspects of the present invention. Confirmation of a phage ORF encoded amino acid sequence can also be confirmed by constructing a recombinant vector from which the ORF can be expressed in an appropriate host (e.g., E. coli), purified, and sequenced by conventional protein sequencing methods.
[0042] In other aspects the invention provides recombinant vectors and cells harboring phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, or phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 or portions thereof, or bacterial target sequences described herein, preferably where the phage or bacterial sequence is inserted in a recombinant vector. As understood by those skilled in the art, vectors may assume different forms, including, for example, plasmids, cosmids, and virus-based vectors. See, e.g., Maniatis, T. et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor University Press, Cold Spring, N.Y.; See also, Ausubel, F. M. et al. (eds.) (1994) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Secaucus, N.J.
[0043] In preferred embodiments, the vectors will be expression vectors, preferably shuttle vectors that permit cloning, replication, and expression within bacteria. An “expression vector” is one having regulatory nucleotide sequences containing transcriptional and translational regulatory information that controls expression of the nucleotide sequence in a host cell. Preferably the vector is constructed to allow amplification from vector sequences flanking an insert locus. In certain embodiments, the expression vectors may additionally or alternatively support expression, and/or replication in animal, plant and/or yeast cells due to the presence of suitable regulatory sequences, e.g., promoters, enhancers, 3′ stabilizing sequences, primer sequences, etc. In preferred embodiments, the promoters are inducible and specific for the system in which expression is desired, e.g., bacteria, animal, plant, or yeast. The vectors may optionally encode a “tag” sequence or sequences to facilitate protein purification or protein detection. Convenient restriction enzyme cloning sites and suitable selective marker(s) are also optionally included. Such selective markers can be, for example, antibiotic resistance markers or markers which supply an essential nutritive growth factor to an otherwise deficient mutant host, e.g., tryptophan, histidine, or leucine in the Yeast Two-Hybrid systems described below.
[0044] The term “recombinant vector” relates to a single- or double-stranded circular nucleic acid molecule that can be transfected into cells and replicated within or independently of a cell genome. A circular double-stranded nucleic acid molecule can be cut and thereby linearized upon treatment with appropriate restriction enzymes. An assortment of nucleic acid vectors, restriction enzymes, and the knowledge of the nucleotide sequences cut by restriction enzymes are readily available to those skilled in the art. A nucleic acid molecule encoding a desired product can be inserted into a vector by cutting the vector with restriction enzymes and ligating the two pieces together. Preferably the vector is an expression vector, e.g., a shuttle expression vector as described above.
[0045] By “recombinant cell” is meant a cell possessing introduced or engineered nucleic acid sequences, e.g., as described above. The sequence may be in the form of or part of a vector or may be integrated into the host cell genome. Preferably the cell is a bacterial cell.
[0046] In preferred embodiments, the inserted nucleic acid sequence corresponding to at least a portion of a phage 3A ORF 33, 41, and 79, phage 77 ORF 1 and phage 96 ORF48, 78, and 100 gene product has a length as specified for the isolated purified or enriched nucleic acid sequences in an aspect above.
[0047] In another aspect, the invention also provides methods for identifying and/or screening compounds “active on” at least one bacterial target of a bacteriophage inhibitor protein or RNA. Preferred embodiments involve contacting bacterial target proteins with a test compound, and determining whether the compound binds to or reduces the level of activity of the bacterial target, e.g., a bacterial protein. Preferably this is done in vivo under approximately physiological conditions. The compounds that can be used may be large or small, synthetic or natural, organic or inorganic, proteinaceous or non-proteinaceous. In preferred embodiments, the compound is a peptidomimetic, as described herein, a bacteriophage inhibitor protein or fragment or derivative thereof, preferably an “activeportion”, or a small molecule. In particular embodiments, the methods include the identification of bacterial targets as described above or otherwise described herein. Preferably the fragment of a bacteriophage inhibitor protein includes less than 80% of an intact bacteriophage inhibitor protein. Preferably, the at least one target includes a plurality of different targets of bacteriophage inhibitor proteins, preferably a plurality of different targets. The plurality of targets can be in or from a plurality of different bacteria, but preferably is from a single bacterial species.
[0048] In embodiments involving binding assays, preferably binding is to a fragment or portion of a bacterial target protein, where the fragment includes less than 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, 50%, 40%, or 30% of an intact bacterial target protein. Preferably, the at least one bacterial target includes a plurality of different targets of bacteriophage inhibitor proteins, preferably a plurality of different targets. The plurality of targets can be in or from a plurality of different bacteria, but preferably is from a single bacterial species.
[0049] A “method of screening” refers to a method for evaluating a relevant activity or property of a large plurality of compounds, rather than just one or a few compounds. For example, a method of screening can be used to conveniently test at least 100, more preferably at least 1000, still more preferably at least 10,000, and most preferably at least 100,000 different compounds, or even more.
[0050] In the context of this invention, the term “small molecule” refers to compounds having molecular mass of less than 3000 Daltons, preferably less than 2000 or 1500, still more preferably less than 1000, and most preferably less than 600 Daltons. Preferably but not necessarily, a small molecule is not an oligopeptide.
[0051] In a related aspect or in preferred embodiments, the invention provides a method of screening for potential antibacterial agents by determining whether any of a plurality of compounds, preferably a plurality of small molecules, is active on at least one target of a bacteriophage inhibitor protein or RNA. Preferred embodiments include those described for the above aspect, including embodiments which involve determining whether one or more test compounds bind to or reduce the level of activity of a bacterial target, and embodiments which utilize a plurality of different targets as described above.
[0052] The identification of bacteria-inhibiting phage ORFs and their encoded products also provides a method for identifying an active portion of such an encoded product. This also provides a method for identifying a potential antibacterial agent by identifying such an active portion of a phage ORF or ORF product. In preferred embodiments, the identification of an active portion involves one or more of mutational analysis, deletion analysis, or analysis of fragments of such products. The method can also include determination of a 3-dimensional structure of an active portion, such as by analysis of crystal diffraction patterns. In further embodiments, the method involves constructing or synthesizing a peptidomimetic compound, where the structure of the peptidomimetic compound corresponds to the structure of the active portion.
[0053] In this context, “corresponds” means that the peptidomimetic compound structure has sufficient similarities to the structure of the active portion that the peptidomimetic will interact with the same molecule as the phage protein and preferably will elicit at least one cellular response in common which relates to the inhibition of the cell by the phage protein.
[0054] The methods for identifying or screening for compounds or agents active on a bacterial target of a phage-encoded inhibitor can also involve identification of a phage-specific site of action on the target.
[0055] An “active portion” as used herein denotes an epitope, a catalytic or regulatory domain, or a fragment of a bacteriophage inhibitor protein that is responsible for, or a significant factor in, bacterial target inhibition. The active portion preferably may be removed from its contiguous sequences and, in isolation, still effect inhibition.
[0056] By “mimetic” is meant a compound structurally and functionally related to a reference compound that can be natural, synthetic, or chimeric. In terms of the present invention, a “peptidomimetic,” for example, is a compound that mimics the activity-related aspects of the 3-dimensional structure of a peptide or polypeptide in a non-peptide compound, for example mimics the structure of a peptide or active portion of a phage- or bacterial ORF-encoded polypeptide.
[0057] A related aspect provides a method for inhibiting a bacterial cell by contacting the bacterial cell with a compound active on a bacterial target of a bacteriophage inhibitor protein or RNA encoded by bacteriophage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, bacteriophage 77 ORF 1, or bacteriophage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100, where the target was uncharacterized. In preferred embodiments, the compound is such a protein, or a fragment or derivative thereof; a structural mimetic, e.g., a peptidomimetic, of such a protein or fragment; a small molecule; the contacting is performed in vitro, the contacting is performed in vivo in an infected or at risk organism, e.g., an animal such as a mammal or bird, for example, a human, or other mammal described herein, or in a plant.
[0058] In the context of this invention, the term “bacteriophage inhibitor protein” refers to a protein encoded by a bacteriophage nucleic acid sequence which inhibits bacterial function in a host bacterium. Thus, it is a bacteria-inhibiting phage product.
[0059] In the context of this invention, the phrase “contacting the bacterial cell with a compound active on a bacterial target of a bacteriophage inhibitor protein” or equivalent phrases refer to contacting with an isolated, purified, or enriched compound or a composition including such a compound, but specifically does not rely on contacting the bacterial cell with an intact naturally occurring phage which encodes the compound. Preferably no intact phage are involved in the contacting.
[0060] Related aspects provide methods for prophylactic or therapeutic treatment of a bacterial infection by administering to an infected, challenged or at risk organism a therapeutically or prophylactically effective amount of a compound active on a target of a bacteriophage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, bacteriophage 77 ORF 1, or bacteriophage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 product, e.g., as described for the previous aspect. Preferably the bacterium involved in the infection or risk of infection produces the identified target of the bacteriophage inhibitor protein or alternatively produces a homologous target compound. In preferred embodiments, the host organism is a plant or animal, preferably a mammal or bird, and more preferably, a human or other mammal described herein. Preferred embodiments include, without limitation, those as described for the preceding aspect.
[0061] Compounds useful for the methods of inhibiting, methods of treating, and pharmaceutical compositions can include novel compounds, but can also include compounds which had previously been identified for a purpose other than inhibition of bacteria. Such compounds can be utilized as described and can be included in pharmaceutical compositions.
[0062] By “treatment” or “treating” is meant administering a compound or pharmaceutical composition for prophylactic and/or therapeutic purposes. The term “prophylactic treatment” refers to treating a patient or animal that is not yet infected but is susceptible to or otherwise at risk of a bacterial infection. The term “therapeutic treatment” refers to administering treatment to a patient already suffering from infection.
[0063] The term “bacterial infection” refers to the invasion of the host organism, animal or plant, by pathogenic bacteria. This includes the excessive growth of bacteria which are normally present in or on the body of the organism, but more generally, a bacterial infection can be any situation in which the presence of a bacterial population(s) is damaging to a host organism. Thus, for example, an organism suffers from a bacterial infection when excessive numbers of a bacterial population are present in or on the organism's body, or when the effects of the presence of a bacterial population(s) is damaging to the cells, tissue, or organs of the organism.
[0064] The terms “administer”, “administering”, and “administration” refer to a method of giving a dosage of a compound or composition, e.g., an antibacterial pharmaceutical composition, to an organism. Where the organism is a mammal, the method is, e.g., topical, oral, intravenous, transdermal, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, or intrathecal. The preferred method of administration can vary depending on various factors, e.g., the components of the pharmaceutical composition, the site of the potential or actual bacterial infection, the bacterium involved, and the infection severity.
[0065] The term “mammal” has its usual biological meaning, referring to any organism of the Class Mammalia of higher vertebrates that nourish their young with milk secreted by mammary glands, e.g., mouse, rat, and, in particular, human, bovine, sheep, swine, dog, and cat.
[0066] In the context of treating a bacterial infection a “therapeutically effective amount” or “pharmaceutically effective amount” indicates an amount of an antibacterial agent, e.g., as disclosed for this invention, which has a therapeutic effect. This generally refers to the inhibition, to some extent, of the normal cellular functioning of bacterial cells that renders or contributes to bacterial infection.
[0067] The dose of antibacterial agent that is useful as a treatment is a “therapeutically effective amount.” Thus, as used herein, a therapeutically effective amount means an amount of an antibacterial agent that produces the desired therapeutic effect as judged by clinical trial results and/or animal models. This amount can be routinely determined by one skilled in the art and will vary depending on several factors, such as the particular bacterial strain involved and the particular antibacterial agent used.
[0068] In connection with claims to methods of inhibiting bacteria and therapeutic or prophylactic treatments, “a compound active on a target of a bacteriophage inhibitor protein” or terms of equivalent meaning differ from administration of or contact with an intact phage naturally encoding the full-length inhibitor compound. While an intact phage may conceivably be incorporated in the present methods, the method at least includes the use of an active compound as specified different from a full length inhibitor protein naturally encoded by a bacteriophage and/or a delivery or contacting method different from administration of or contact with an intact phage naturally encoding the full-length protein. Similarly, pharmaceutical compositions described herein at least include an active compound or composition different from a phage naturally coding the full-length inhibitor protein, or such a full-length protein is provided in the composition in a form different from being encoded by an intact phage. Preferably the methods and compositions do not include an intact phage.
[0069] In accordance with the above aspects, the invention also provides antibacterial agents and compounds active on a bacterial target of bacteriophage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, bacteriophage 77 ORF 1, or bacteriophage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100, where the target was uncharacterized as indicated above. As previously indicated, such active compounds include both novel compounds and compounds which had previously been identified for a purpose other than inhibition of bacteria. Such previously identified biologically active compounds can be used in embodiments of the above methods of inhibiting and treating. In preferred embodiments, the targets, bacteriophage, and active compound are as described herein for methods of inhibiting and methods of treating. Preferably the agent or compound is formulated in a pharmaceutical composition which includes a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, excipient, or diluent. In addition, the invention provides agents, compounds, and pharmaceutical compositions where an active compound is active on an uncharacterized phage-specific site on the target.
[0070] In preferred embodiments, the target is as described for embodiments of aspects above.
[0071] Likewise, the invention provides a method of making an antibacterial agent. The method involves identifying a target of a bacteriophage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, bacteriophage 77 ORF 1, or bacteriophage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 product, screening a plurality of compounds to identify a compound active on the target, and synthesizing the compound in an amount sufficient to provide a therapeutic effect when administered to an organism infected by a bacterium naturally producing the target.
[0072] In preferred embodiments, the identification of the target and identification of active compounds include steps or methods and/or components as described above (or otherwise herein) for such identification. Likewise, the active compound can be as described above, including fragments and derivatives of phage inhibitor proteins, peptidomimetics, and small molecules. As recognized by those skilled in the art, peptides can be synthesized by expression systems and purified, or can be synthesized artificially by methods well known in the art.
[0073] In the context of nucleic acid or amino acid sequences of this invention, the term “corresponding” and “correspond” indicates that the sequence is at least 95% identical, preferably at least 97% identical, and more preferably at least 99% identical to a sequence from the specified phage genome or bacterial genome, a ribonucleotide equivalent, a degenerate equivalent (utilizing one or more degenerate codons), or a homologous sequence, where the homolog provides functionally equivalent biological function.
[0074] In embodiments where the bacterial target of a bacteriophage inhibitor ORF product, e.g., an inhibitory protein or polypeptide, the target is preferably encoded by a S. aureusnucleic acid coding sequence from a host bacterium for bacteriophages 3A, 77, or 96. Target sequences are described herein by reference to sequence source sites. The sequence encoding the target preferably corresponds to a S. aureusnucleic acid sequence available from numerous sources including S. aureussequences deposited in GenBank, S. aureussequences found in European Patent Application No. 97100110.7 to Human Genome Sciences, Inc. filed Jan. 7, 1997, S. aureussequences available from TIGR at http://www.tigr.org/tdb/mdb/mdb.html, and S. aureussequences available from the Oklahoma University S. aureussequencing project at the following URL:
[0075] http://www.genome.ou.edu/staph_new.html.
[0076] The amino acid sequence of a polypeptide target is readily provided by translating the corresponding coding region. For the sake of brevity, the sequences are not reproduced herein. Also, in preferred embodiments, a target sequence corresponds to a S. aureuscoding sequences corresponding to a sequence listed in Table 7. The listings in Table 7 describe S. aureussequences currently deposited in GenBank. Again, for the sake of brevity, the sequences are described by reference to the GenBank entries instead of being written out in full herein. In cases where an entry for a coding region is not complete, the complete sequence can be readily obtained by routine methods, by isolating a clone in a phages 3A, 77, and 96 host S. aureusgenomic library, and sequencing the clone insert to provide the relevant coding region. The boundaries of the coding region can be identified by conventional sequence analysis and/or by expression in a bacterium in which the endogenous copy of the coding region has been inactivated and using subcloning to identify the functional start and stop codons for the coding region.
[0077] In an additional aspect, the present invention provides a nucleic acid segment which encodes a protein and corresponds to a segment of the nucleic acid sequence of an ORF (open reading frame) from Staphylococcus aureusbacteriophages 3A, 77 or 96 as provided in Table 1. Preferably, the protein is a functional protein. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that bacteriophage possess genes which encode proteins which may be either beneficial or detrimental to a bacterial cell. Such proteins act to replicate DNA, translate RNA, manipulate DNA or RNA, and enable the phage to integrate into the bacterial genome. Proteins from bacteriophage can function as, for example, a polymerase, kinase, phosphatase, helicase, nuclease, topoisomerase, endonuclease, reverse transcriptase, endoribonuclease, dehydrogenase, gyrase, integrase, carboxypeptidase, proteinase, amidase, transcriptional regulators and the like, and/or the protein may be a functional protein such as a chaperon, capsid protein, head and tail proteins, a DNA or RNA binding protein, or a membrane protein, all of which are provided as non-limiting examples. Proteins with functions such as these are useful as tools for the scientific community.
[0078] Thus, the present invention provides a group of novel proteins from bacteriophage which can be used as tools for biotechnical applications such as, for example, DNA and/or RNA sequencing, polymerase chain reaction and/or reverse transcriptase PCR, cloning experiments, cleavage of DNA and/or RNA, reporter assays and the like. Preferably, the protein is encoded by an open reading frame in the nucleic acid sequences of bacteriophages 3A, 77 or 96. Within the scope of the present invention are fragments of proteins and/or truncated portions of proteins which have been either engineered through automated protein synthesis, or prepared from nucleic acid segments which correspond to segments of the nucleic acid sequences of bacteriophages 3A, 77 or 96, and which are then inserted into cells via plasmid vectors which can be induced to express the protein. It is understood by one of skill in the art that mutational analysis of proteins has been known to help provide proteins which are more stable and which have higher and/or more specific activities. Such mutations are also within the scope of the present invention, hence, the present invention provides a mutated protein and/or the mutated nucleic acid segment from bacteriophages 3A, 77 or 96 which encodes the protein.
[0079] In another aspect, the invention provides antibodies which bind proteins encoded by a nucleic acid segment which corresponds to the nucleic acid sequence of an ORF (open reading frame) from Staphylococcus aureusbacteriophages 3A, 77 or 96 as provided in Table 1. Bacteriophages are bacterial viruses which contain nucleic acid sequences which encode proteins that can correspond to proteins of other bacteriophages and other viruses. Antibodies targeted for proteins encoded by nucleic acid segments of phages 3A, 77 or 96 can serve to bind targets encoded by nucleic acid segments from other viruses which correspond to the sequences provided in Table 1. Furthermore, antibodies to proteins encoded by nucleic acid segments of phages 3A, 77 or 96 can also bind to proteins from other viruses that share similar functions but may not share corresponding sequences. It is understood in the art that proteins with similar activities/functions from a variety of sources generally share motifs, regions, or domains which correspond. Thus, antibodies to motifs, regions, or domains of functional proteins from phages 3A, 77 or 96 should be useful in detecting corresponding proteins in other bacteriophages and viruses. Such antibodies can also be used to detect the presence of a virus sharing a similar protein. Preferably the virus to be detected is pathogenic to a mammal, such as a dog, cat, bovine, sheep, swine, or a human.
[0080] As used in the claims to describe the various inventive aspects and embodiments, “comprising” means including, but not limited to, whatever follows the word “comprising”. Thus, use of the term “comprising” indicates that the listed elements are required or mandatory, but that other elements are optional and may or may not be present. By “consisting of” is meant including, and limited to, whatever follows the phrase “consisting of”. Thus, the phrase “consisting of” indicates that the listed elements are required or mandatory and that no other elements may be present. By “consisting essentially of” is meant including any elements listed after the phrase, and limited to other elements that do not interfere with or contribute to the activity or action specified in the disclosure for the listed elements. Thus, the phrase “consisting essentially of” indicates that the listed elements are required or mandatory, but that other elements are optional and may or may not be present depending upon whether or not they affect the activity or action of the listed elements.
[0081] Additional features and embodiments of the present invention will be apparent from the following Detailed Description and from the claims, all within the scope of the present invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0082] FIG. 1 are flow schematics showing the manipulations necessary to convert pT0021, an arsenite inducible vector containing the luciferase gene, into a) pTM, b) pTMSM or c) pTHA three ars inducible vectors. Vector pTM contains Bam HI and Hind III cloning sites. Vector pTMSM contains BamHI, SalI and MluI cloning sites. Vector pTHA contains BamHI and SalI cloning sites and a downstream HA epitope tag. This figure also shows in d), the characteristic of the lactose-inducible vector pTMSLac containing Bam HI and SalI cloning sites.
[0083] FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of the cloning steps involved to place the DNA segments of any ORFs e.g. 3A ORF 33, 41, 79, or 77 ORF 1, or 96 ORF 48, 78, 100 or other sequences into vector to assess inhibitory potential. For subcloning into a) pTM (and similarly into pTMSM and pTMSLac) individual ORFs were amplified by the PCR using oligonucleotides targetting the start and stop codons of the ORFs. Using this strategy cloning sites (here BamHI and HindIII), were positioned immediately upstream or downstream, respectively of the start and stop codons of each ORF. Following digestion with BamHI and HindIII, the PCR fragments were subcloned into the same sites of pTM (BamHI and HindIII). For subcloning into b) pTHA, individual ORFs e.g. 3A ORF 33, 41, 77 ORF 1 and 96 ORF 48, 78 were amplified by the PCR using oligonucleotides targetting the start codon and the penultimated codon of the ORFs. Using this strategy, BamHI and SalI sites were positioned immediately upstream or downstream, respectively of these two codons. Following digestion with BamHI and SalI, the PCR fragments were subcloned into the same sites of pTHA. Clones were verified by direct sequencing.
[0084] FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of the functional assays used to characterize the bactericidal and bacteriostatic potential of predicted ORFs (>33 amino acids) encoded by bacteriophages 3A, 77, 96. FIG. 3a) Functional assay on semi-solid support media. FIG. 3b) Functional assay in liquid culture.
[0085] FIG. 4 shows the results of the functional assay on semi-solid support media to identify bacteriophage 3A, 77 and 96 ORFs with anti-microbial activity. FIG. 4a) shows the lists of the bacteriophage 3A, 77 and 96 ORFs that were screened in the functional assay and FIG. 4b) shows inhibition of bacterial growth following induction of expression of phage 3A ORF 33, 41 and 79, phage 77 ORF1 and phage 96 ORF 48 and 100 from three clones of Staphylococcus aureustransformants. One clone of Staphylococcus aureustransformed with the non-inhibitory ORF (44AHJD bacteriophage ORF 114 cloned into pTM vector) was used as control. From these experiments, it is clear that expression of these ORFs leads to the inhibition of growth of Staphylococcus aureus.
[0086] FIG. 5 are the graphs of OD565values and colony forming units (CFU) over time showing the results of functional assay in liquid media to assess bacteriostatic or bactericidal activity of bacteriophage 3A ORF 33, 41 and 79, bacteriophage 77 ORF 1 and bacteriophage 96 ORF 48, 78 and 100. Growth inhibition assays were performed as detailed in the Detailed Description. The OD565values and the number of CFU were determined from cultures of Staphylococcus aureustransformants harboring a given bacteriophage inhibitory ORF, in the absence or presence of the inducer. The identity of the expression vector and subcloned ORF harbored by the Staphylococcus aureusis given at the top of the each graph. The value of OD and the number of CFU was also determined from non-induced and induced control cultures of Staphylococcus aureustransformants harboring a non-inhibitory phage ORF cloned into the same vector. Each graph represents the average obtained from three Staphylococcus aureustransformants.
[0087] FIG. 6 shows the pattern of protein expression of the inhibitory ORF in S. aureusin the presence or in the absence of induction with sodium arsenite. Individual inhibitory ORF (phage 3A ORF 33, 41 and 79, phage 77 ORF 1, phage 96 ORF 48, 78 and 100) were subcloned into the pTHA vector. This vector contains BamH I, Sal I cloning sites and a downstream HA epitope tag. The HA tag is set inframe with the ORF and is positioned at the carboxy terminus of each ORF. An anti-HA tag antibody was used for the detection of the ORF expression. The identity of the subcdoned ORF harbored by the Staphylococcus aureustransformants is given at the top of each panel.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0088] Preliminarily the tables will be briefly described.
[0089] Table 1 shows the complete nucleotide sequence of the genomes of Staphylococcus aureusbacteriophages 3A, 77 and 96.
[0090] Table 2 is a table from Alberts et al., MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL 3rded., showing the redundancy of the “universal” genetic code.
[0091] Table 3 shows the nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences of ORF 33, 41, and 79 from bacteriophage 3A, ORF1 from bacteriophage 77, and ORF 48, 78, and 100 from bacteriophage 96.
[0092] Table 4 shows the sequence similarities identified to date between ORFs predicted to be encoded by Staphylococcus aureusbacteriophages 3A, 77 and 96 and sequences present in the Genbank and Swissprot sequence databases. More specifically, these results indicate that: I) ORF 1 from phage 77 has significant homology to various genes in the NCBI non-redundant nucleotide database—such as the gene encoding for ORF 16 of the bacteriophage phi PVL, and II) ORF 48 from phage 96 has significant homology to one gene in the NCBI non-redundant nucleotide database—the gene encoding ORF 39 of the bacteriophage phi PVL.
[0093] Table 5 shows sequence alignment of phage 96 inhibitory ORFs with other identified inhibitory phage ORFs. The results of this search indicate that the inhibitory 96 ORF 100 has significant homology to the the inhibitory 3A ORF 79 and 96 ORF 48 has a significant homology to the previously identified phage 77 inhibitory ORFs 43 and 182.
[0094] Table 6 shows the physiochemical parameters of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, 79, phage 77 ORF 1 and phage 96 ORF 48, 78, 100. These include the primary amino acid sequence of the predicted protein, the average molecular weight, amino acid composition, theoretical pI and hydrophobicity properties.
[0095] Table 7 shows S. aureuscoding sequences corresponding sequences currently deposited in GenBank.
[0096] The present invention is based on the identification of naturally-occurring DNA sequence elements encoding RNA or proteins with anti-microbial activity. Bacteriophages or phages, are viruses that infect and kill bacteria. They are natural enemies of bacteria and, over the course of evolution have perfected enzymes and proteins (products of DNA sequences) which enable them to infect a host bacteria, replicate their genetic material, usurp host metabolism, and ultimately kill their host. The scientific literature documents well the fact that many known bacteria have a large number of such bacteriophages that can infect and kill them (for example, see the ATCC bacteriophage collection at http://www.atcc.org) (Ackermann and DuBow, 1987). Although we know that many bacteriophages encode proteins which can significantly alter their host's metabolism, determination of the killing potential of a given bacteriophage gene product can only be assessed by expressing the gene product in the target bacterial strain.
[0097] As indicated in the Summary above, the present invention is concerned with the use of bacteriophage 3A, 77, and 96 coding sequences and the encoded polypeptides or RNA transcripts to identify bacterial targets for potential new antibacterial agents. Thus, the invention concerns the selection of relevant bacteria. Particularly relevant bacteria are those which are pathogens of a complex organism such as an animal, e.g., mammals, reptiles, and birds, and plants. However, the invention can be applied to any bacterium (whether pathogenic or not) for which bacteriophage are available or which are found to have cellular components closely homologous to components targeted by phage 3A ORF 33, 41, 79, phage 77 ORF 1, and phage 96 ORF 48, 78, 100.
[0098] Identification of ORFs 33, 41 and 78 from phage 3A, ORF 1 from phage 77 and ORF 48, 78, 100 from phage 96 and products from the phage which inhibit the host bacterium both provides an inhibitor compound and allows identification of the bacterial target affected by the phage-encoded inhibitor. Such a target is thus identified as a potential target for development of other antibacterial agents or inhibitors and the use of those targets to inhibit those bacteria. As indicated above, even if such a target is not initially identified in a particular bacterium, such a target can still be identified if a homologous target is identified in another bacterium. Usually, but not necessarily, such another bacterium would be a genetically closely related bacterium. Indeed, in some cases, an inhibitor encoded by phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF1 or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 can also inhibit such a homologous bacterial cellular component.
[0099] The demonstration that bacteriophage have adapted to inhibiting a host bacterium by acting on a particular cellular component or target provides a strong indication that that component is an appropriate target for developing and using antibacterial agents, e.g., in therapeutic treatments. Thus, the present invention provides additional guidance over mere identification of bacterial essential genes, as the present invention also provides an indication of accessibility of the target to an inhibitor, and an indication that the target is sufficiently stable over time (e.g., not subject to high rates of mutation) as phage acting on that target were able to develop and persist. Thus, the present invention identifies a particular subset of essential cellular components which are particularly likely to be appropriate targets for development of antibacterial agents.
[0100] The invention also, therefore, concerns the development or identification of inhibitors of bacteria, in addition to the phage-encoded inhibitory proteins (or RNA transcripts), which are active on the targets of bacteriophage-encoded inhibitors. As described herein, such inhibitors can be of a variety of different types, but are preferably small molecules.
[0101] The following description provides preferred methods for implementing the various aspects of the invention. However, as those skilled in the art will readily recognize, other approaches can be used to obtain and process relevant information. Thus, the invention is not limited to the specifically described methods. In addition, the following description provides a set of steps in a particular order. That series of steps describes the overall development involved in the present invention. However, it is clear that individual steps or portions of steps may be usefully practiced separately, and, further, that certain steps may be performed in a different order or even bypassed if appropriate information is already available or is provided by other sources or methods.
Identification of Inhibitory ORF
[0102] The methodology previously described in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/407,804 filed Sep. 28, 1999, and PCT International Application No. PCT/IB99/02040, was used to identify and characterize DNA sequences from Staphylococcus aureusbacteriophages 3A, 77 and 96 that can act as anti-microbials.
[0103] A nucleic acid segment isolated from Staphylococcus aureusbacteriophages 3A, 77 or 96 encodes a protein, whose gene is referred to as ORF (open reading frame) 33, 41, 79, 1, 48, 78, or 100 Thus, the present invention provides a nucleic acid sequence isolated from Staphylococcus aureus(Staph Aor S. aureus) bacteriophages 3A, 77, or 96 comprising at least a portion of the gene encoding phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 with anti-microbial activity. The nucleic acid sequence can be isolated using a method similar to those described herein, or using another method. In addition, such a nucleic acid sequence can be chemically synthesized. Having the anti-microbial nucleic acid sequence of the present invention, parts thereof or oligonucleotides derived therefrom, other anti-microbial sequences from other bacteriophage sources using methods described herein or other methods can be isolated, including screening methods based on nucleic acid sequence hybridization.
[0104] The present invention provides the use of the Staph Abacteriophages 3A, 77, or 96 anti-microbial DNA segment encoding phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100, as a pharmacological agent, either wholly or in part, as well as the use of peptidomimetics, developed from amino acid or nucleotide sequence knowledge of Staph Aphage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100. This can be achieved where the structure of the peptidomimetic compound corresponds to the structure of the active portion of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100. In this analysis, the peptide backbone is transformed into a carbon-based hydrophobic structure that can retain cytostatic or cytocidal activity for the bacterium. This is done by standard medicinal chemistry methods, measuring growth inhibition of the various molecules in liquid cultures or on solid medium. These mimetics also represent lead compounds for the development of novel antibiotics.
[0105] In this context, “corresponds” means that the peptidomimetic compound structure has sufficient similarities to the structure of the active portion of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 that the peptidomimetic will interact with the same molecule as the product of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 and preferably will elicit at least one cellular response in common which relates to the inhibition of the cell by the phage protein.
[0106] The invention also provides bacteriophage anti-microbial DNA segments from other phages based on nucleic acids and sequences hybridizing to the presently identified inhibitory ORF under high stringency conditions or sequences which are homologous as described above. The bacteriophage anti-microbial DNA segment from phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 can be used to identify a related segment from another related or unrelated phage based on conditions of hybridization or sequence comparison.
Identification of Bacterial Targets
[0107] The present invention provides the use of Staphylococcus phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 anti-microbial activity to identify essential host bacterium interacting proteins or other targets that could, in turn, be used for drug design and/or screening of test compounds. Thus, the invention provides a method of screening for antibacterial agents by determining whether test compounds interact with (e.g., bind to) the bacterial target. The invention also provides a method of making an antibacterial agent based on production and purification of the protein or RNA product of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100. The method involves identifying a bacterial target of the product of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100, screening a plurality of compounds to identify a compound active on the target, and synthesizing the compound in an amount sufficient to provide a therapeutic effect when administered to an organism infected by a bacterium naturally producing the target. The rationale is that the product of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 can physically interact and/or modify certain microbial host components to block their function.
[0108] A variety of methods are known to those skilled in the art for identifying interacting molecules and for identifying target cellular components. Several approaches and techniques are described below which can be used to identify the host bacterial pathway and protein that interact or are inhibited by phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100.
[0109] The first approach is a genetic screen for protein:protein interaction, e.g., either some form of two hybrid screen or some form of suppressor screen. In one form of the two hybrid screen involving the yeast two hybrid system, the nucleic acid segment encoding phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100, or a portion thereof, is fused to the carboxyl terminus of the yeast Gal4 DNA binding domain to create a bait vector. A genomic DNA library of cloned S. aureussequences which have been engineered into a plasmid where the S. aureussequences are fused to the carboxyl terminus of the yeast of Gal4 activation domain II (amino acids 768-881), is also generated. These plasmids are introduced alone, or in combination, into a yeast strain, e.g., Y190, previously engineered with chromosomally integrated copies of the E. colilacZ and the selectable His3 genes, both under Gal4 regulation (Durfee et al., 1993). If the two proteins expressed in yeast interact, the resulting complex will activate transcription from promoters containing Gal4 binding sites. A lacZ and His3 gene, each driven by a promoter containing Gal4 binding sites, have been integrated into the genome of the host yeast system and are used for measuring protein-protein interactions. Such a system provides a physiological environment in which to detect potential protein interactions.
[0110] This system has been extensively used to identify novel protein-protein interaction partners and to map the sites required for interaction (for example, to identify interacting partners of translation factors (Qui et al., 1998), transcription factors (Katagiri et al., 1998), proteins involved in signal transduction (Endo et al., 1997). Alternatively, a bacterial two-hybrid screen can be utilized to circumvent the need for the interacting proteins to be targeted to the nucleus, as is the case in the yeast system (Karimova et al., 1998).
[0111] The protein targets of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 can also be identified using bacterial genetic screens. One approach involves the overexpression of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 protein in mutagenized S. aureusfollowed by plating the cells and searching for colonies that can survive the anti-microbial activity of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100. These colonies are then grown, their DNA extracted, and cloned into an expression vector that contains a replicon of a different incompatibility group from the plasmid expressing phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100. This library is then introduced into a wild-type Staph Abacterium in conjunction with an expression vector driving synthesis of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100, followed by selection for surviving bacteria. Thus, Staph ADNA fragments from the survivors presumably contain a DNA fragment from the original mutagenized Staph Agenome that can protect the cell from the antimicrobial activity phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100. This fragment can be sequenced and compared with that of the bacterial host to determine in which gene the mutation lies. This approach enables one to determine the targets and pathways that are affected by the killing function.
[0112] Alternatively, the bacterial targets can be determined in the absence of selecting for mutations using the approach known as “multicopy suppression”. In this approach, the DNA from the wild type Staph Ahost is cloned into an expression vector that can coexist with the one containing phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100. Those plasmids that contain host DNA fragments and genes which protect the host from the anti microbial activity of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 can then be isolated and sequenced to identify putative targets and pathways in the host bacteria.
[0113] Another approach is based on identifying protein:protein interactions between the product of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 and S. aureushost proteins, using a biochemical approach based on affinity chromatography. This approach has been used to identify interactions between lambda phage proteins and proteins from their E. colihost (Sopta et al., 1995). The product of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 is fused to a tag (e.g. -glutathione-S-transferase) after insertion in a commercially available plasmid vector which directs high-level expression after induction of the responsive promoter driving the fusion protein. The fusion protein is expressed in E. coli, purified, and immobilized on a solid phase matrix. Total cell extracts from S. aureusare then passed through the affinity matrix containing the immobilized phage ORF fusion protein; host proteins retained on the column are then eluted under different conditions of ionic strength, pH, and detergents and identified by gel electrophoresis. They are recovered from the gel by transfer to a high affinity membrane. The proteins are individually digested to completion with a protease (e.g.-trypsin) and either molecular mass or the amino acid sequence of the tryptic fragments can be determined by mass spectrometry using MALDI-TOF technology (Qin et al., 1997). The sequence of the individual peptides from a single protein are then analyzed by a bioinformatics approach to identify the S. aureusprotein interacting with the phage ORF. This is performed by a computer search of the S. aureusgenome for the identified sequence. Alternatively, tryptic peptide fragments of the S. aureusgenome can be predicted by computer software based on the nucleotide sequence of the genome, and the predicted molecular mass of peptide fragments generated in silico compared to the molecular mass of the peptides obtained from each interacting protein eluted from the affinity matrix.
[0114] In addition, an oligonucleotide cocktail can be synthesized based on the primary amino acid sequence determined for an interacting S. aureusprotein fragment. This oligonucleotide cocktail would comprise a mixture of oligonucleotides based on the nucleotide sequences of the primary amino acid of the predicted peptide, but in which all possible codons for a particular amino acid sequence are present in a subset of the oligonucleotide pool. This cocktail can then be used as a degenerate probe set to screen, by hybridization to genomic or cDNA libraries, to isolate the corresponding gene.
[0115] Alternatively, antibodies raised to peptides which correspond to an interacting S. aureusprotein fragment can be used to screen expression libraries (genomic or cDNA) to identify the gene encoding the interacting protein.
Vectors
[0116] The invention also provides vectors, preferably expression vectors, harboring the anti-microbial DNA nucleic acid segment of the invention in an expressible form, and cells transformed with the same. Such cells can serve a variety of purposes, such as in vitro models for the function of the anti-microbial nucleic acid segment and screening for downstream targets of the anti-microbial nucleic acid segment, as well as expression to provide relatively large quantities of the inhibitory product.
[0117] Thus, an expression vector harboring the anti-microbial nucleic acid segment or parts thereof (Staph Abacteriophage 3A ORF 33, 41, 79, bacteriophage 77 ORF 1, bacteriophage 96 ORF 48, 78, 100) can also be used to obtain substantially pure protein. Well-known vectors, such as the pGEX series (available from Pharmacia), can be used to obtain large amounts of the protein which can then be purified by standard biochemical methods based on charge, molecular mass, solubility, or affinity selection of the protein by using gene fusion techniques (such as GST fusion, which permits the purification of the protein of interest on a glutathione column). Other types of purification methods or fusion proteins could also be used as recognized by those skilled in the art.
[0118] Likewise, vectors containing phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 can be used in methods for identifying targets of the encoded antibacterial ORF product, e.g., as described above, and/or for testing inhibition of homologous bacterial targets or other potential targets in bacterial species other than Staphylococcus aureus.
Antibodies
[0119] Antibodies, both polyclonal and monoclonal, can be prepared against the protein encoded by a bacteriophage anti-microbial DNA segment of the invention (e.g., Staph Aphage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100) by methods well known in the art. Protein for preparation of such antibodies can be prepared by purification, usually from a recombinant cell expressing the specified ORF or fragment thereof. Those skilled in the art are familiar with methods for preparing polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies (See, e.g., Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Harlow and Lane, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, CSHL Press, N.Y., 1988).
[0120] Such antibodies can be used for a variety of purposes including affinity purification of the protein encoded by the bacteriophage anti-microbial DNA segment, tethering of the protein encoded by the bacteriophage anti-microbial DNA segment to a solid matrix for purposes of identifying interacting host bacterium proteins, and for monitoring of expression of the protein encoded by the bacteriophage anti-microbial DNA segment.
Recombinant Cells
[0121] Bacterial cells containing an inducible vector regulating expression of the bacteriophage anti-microbial DNA segment can be used to generate an animal model system for the study of infection by the host bacterium. The functional activity of the proteins encoded by the bacteriophage anti-microbial DNA segments, whether native or mutated, can be tested in animal in vitro or in vivo models.
[0122] While such cells containing inducible expression vectors is preferred, other recombinant cells containing a recombinant phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 sequence or portion thereof are also provided by the present invention.
[0123] Also, a recombinant cell may contain a recombinant sequence encoding at least a portion of a protein which is a target of phage 3A ORF 33, 41, or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78, or 100 inhibitory ORF product.
[0124] In the context of this invention, in connection with nucleic acid sequences, the term “recombinant” refers to nucleic acid sequences which have been placed in a genetic location by intervention using molecular biology techniques, and does not include the relocation of phage sequences during or as a result of phage infection of a bacterium or normal genetic exchange processes such as bacterial conjugation.
Derivatization of Identified Anti-microbials
[0125] In cases where the identified anti-microbials above are peptidic compounds, the in vivo effectiveness of such compounds may be advantageously enhanced by chemical modification using the natural polypeptide as a starting point and incorporating changes that provide advantages for use, for example, increased stability to proteolytic degradation, reduced antigenicity, improved tissue penetration, and/or improved delivery characteristics.
[0126] In addition to active modifications and derivative creations, it can also be useful to provide inactive modifications or derivatives for use as negative controls or introduction of immunologic tolerance. For example, a biologically inactive derivative which has essentially the same epitopes as the corresponding natural antimicrobial can be used to induce immunological tolerance in a patient being treated. The induction of tolerance can then allow uninterrupted treatment with the active anti-microbial to continue for a significantly longer period of time.
[0127] Modified anti-microbial polypeptides and derivatives can be produced using a number of different types of modifications to the amino acid chain. Many such methods are known to those skilled in the art. The changes can include, for example, reduction of the size of the molecule, and/or the modification of the amino acid sequence of the molecule. In addition, a variety of different chemical modifications of the naturally occurring polypeptide can be used, either with or without modifications to the amino acid sequence or size of the molecule. Such chemical modifications can, for example, include the incorporation of modified or non-natural amino acids or non-amino acid moieties during synthesis of the peptide chain, or the post-synthesis modification of incorporated chain moieties.
[0128] The oligopeptides of this invention can be synthesized chemically or through an appropriate gene expression system. Synthetic peptides can include both naturally occurring amino acids and laboratory synthesized, modified amino acids.
[0129] Also provided herein are functional derivatives of anti-microbial proteins or polypeptides. By “functional derivative” is meant a “chemical derivative,” “fragment,” “variant,” “chimera,” or “hybrid” of the polypeptide or protein, which terms are defined below. A functional derivative retains at least a portion of the function of the protein, for example, reactivity with a specific antibody, enzymatic activity or binding activity.
[0130] A “chemical derivative” of the complex contains additional chemical moieties not normally a part of the protein or peptide. Such moieties may improve the molecule's solubility, absorption, biological half-life, and the like. The moieties may alternatively decrease the toxicity of the molecule, eliminate or attenuate any undesirable side effect of the molecule, and the like. Moieties capable of mediating such effects are disclosed in Genaro, 1995, Remington's Pharmaceutical Science. Procedures for coupling such moieties to a molecule are well known in the art. Covalent modifications of the protein or peptides are included within the scope of this invention. Such modifications may be introduced into the molecule by reacting targeted amino acid residues of the peptide with an organic derivatizing agent that is capable of reacting with selected side chains or terminal residues, as described below.
[0131] Cysteinyl residues most commonly are reacted with alpha-haloacetates (and corresponding amines), such as chloroacetic acid or chloroacetamide, to give carboxymethyl or carboxyamidomethyl derivatives. Cysteinyl residues also are derivatized by reaction with bromotrifluoroacetone, chloroacetyl phosphate, N-alkylmaleimides, 3-nitro-2-pyridyl disulfide, methyl 2-pyridyl disulfide, p-chloro-mercuribenzoate, 2-chloromercuri-4-nitrophenol, or chloro-7-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole.
[0132] Histidyl residues are derivatized by reaction with diethylprocarbonate at pH 5.5-7.0 because this agent is relatively specific for the histidyl side chain. Para-bromophenacyl bromide also is useful; the reaction is preferably performed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate at pH 6.0.
[0133] Lysinyl and amino terminal residues are reacted with succinic or other carboxylic acid anhydrides. Derivatization with these agents has the effect of reversing the charge of the lysinyl residues. Other suitable reagents for derivatizing primary amine-containing residues include imidoesters such as methyl picolinimidate; pyridoxal phosphate; pyridoxal; chloroborohydride; trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid; O-methylisourea; 2,4 pentanedione; and transaminase-catalyzed reaction with glyoxylate.
[0134] Arginyl residues are modified by reaction with one or several conventional reagents, among them phenylglyoxal, 2,3-butanedione, 1,2-cyclohexanedione, and ninhydrin. Derivatization of arginine residues requires that the reaction be performed in alkaline conditions because of the high pKaof the guanidine functional group. Furthermore, these reagents may react with the groups of lysine as well as the arginine alpha-amino group.
[0135] Tyrosyl residues are well-known targets of modification for introduction of spectral labels by reaction with aromatic diazonium compounds or tetranitromethane. Most commonly, N-acetylimidizol and tetranitromethane are used to form O-acetyl tyrosyl species and 3-nitro derivatives, respectively.
[0136] Carboxyl side groups (aspartyl or glutamyl) are selectively modified by reaction carbodiimide (R′—N—C—N—R′) such as 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinyl(4-ethyl) carbodiumide or 1-ethyl-3-(4-azonia-4,4-dimethylpentyl) carbodiimide. Furthermore, aspartyl and glutamyl residues are converted to asparaginyl and glutaminyl residues by reaction with ammonium ions.
[0137] Glutaminyl and asparaginyl residues are frequently deamidated to the corresponding glutamyl and aspartyl residues. Alternatively, these residues are deamidated under mildly acidic conditions. Either form of these residues falls within the scope of this invention.
[0138] Derivatization with bifunctional agents is useful, for example, for cross-linking component peptides to each other or the complex to a water-insoluble support matrix or to other macromolecular carriers. Commonly used cross-linking agents include, for example, 1,1-bis (diazoacetyl)-2-phenylethane, glutaraldehyde, N-hydroxysuccinimide esters, for example, esters with 4-azidosalicylic acid, homobifunctional imidoesters, including disuccinimidyl esters such as 3,3′-dithiobis(succinimidylpropionate), and bifunctional maleimides such as bis-N-maleimido-1,8-octane. Derivatizing agents such as methyl-3-[p-azidophenyl) dithiolpropioimidate yield photoactivatable intermediates that are capable of forming crosslinks in the presence of light. Alternatively, reactive water-insoluble matrices such as cyanogen bromide-activated carbohydrates and the reactive substrates described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,969,287; 3,691,016; 4,195,128; 4,247,642; 4,229,537; and 4,330,440 are employed for protein immobilization.
[0139] Other modifications include hydroxylation of proline and lysine, phosphorylation of hydroxyl groups of seryl or threonyl residues, methylation of the alpha-amino groups of lysine, arginine, and histidine side chains (Creighton, T. E., Proteins: Structure and Molecular Properties, W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, pp. 79-86 (1983)), acetylation of the N-terminal amine, and, in some instances, amidation of the C-terminal carboxyl groups.
[0140] Such derivatized moieties may improve the stability, solubility, absorption, biological half-life, and the like. The moieties may alternatively eliminate or attenuate any undesirable side effect of the protein complex. Moieties capable of mediating such effects are disclosed, for example, in Genaro, 1995, Remington's Pharmaceutical Science.
[0141] The term “fragment” is used to indicate a polypeptide derived from the amino acid sequence of the protein or polypeptide having a length less than the full-length polypeptide from which it has been derived. Such a fragment may, for example, be produced by proteolytic cleavage of the full-length protein. Preferably, the fragment is obtained recombinantly by appropriately modifying the DNA sequence encoding the proteins to delete one or more amino acids at one or more sites of the C-terminus, N-terminus, and/or within the native sequence.
[0142] Another functional derivative intended to be within the scope of the present invention is a “variant” polypeptide which either lacks one or more amino acids or contains additional or substituted amino acids relative to the native polypeptide. The variant may be derived from a naturally occurring polypeptide by appropriately modifying the protein DNA coding sequence to add, remove, and/or to modify codons for one or more amino acids at one or more sites of the C-terminus, N-terminus, and/or within the native sequence.
[0143] A functional derivative of a protein or polypeptide with deleted, inserted and/or substituted amino acid residues may be prepared using standard techniques well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, the modified components of the functional derivatives may be produced using site-directed mutagenesis techniques (as exemplified by Adelman et al., 1983, DNA2:183; Sambrook et al., 1989) wherein nucleotides in the DNA coding sequence are modified such that a modified coding sequence is produced, and thereafter expressing this recombinant DNA in a prokaryotic or eukaryotic host cell, using techniques such as those described above. Alternatively, components of functional derivatives of complexes with amino acid deletions, insertions and/or substitutions may be conveniently prepared by direct chemical synthesis, using methods well-known in the art.
[0144] Insofar as other anti-microbial inhibitor compounds identified by the invention described herein may not be peptidal in nature, other chemical techniques exist to allow their suitable modification, as well, and according the desirable principles discussed above.
Administration and Pharmnaceutical Compositions
[0145] For the therapeutic and prophylactic treatment of infection, the preferred method of preparation or administration of anti-microbial compounds will generally vary depending on the precise identity and nature of the anti-microbial being delivered. Thus, those skilled in the art will understand that administration methods known in the art will also be appropriate for the compounds of this invention. Pharmaceutical compositions are prepared, as understood by those skilled in the art, to be appropriate for therapeutic use. Thus, generally the components and composition are prepared to be sterile and free of components or contaminants which would pose an unacceptable risk to a patient. For compositions to be administered internally is is generally important that the composition be pyrogen free, for example.
[0146] The particularly desired anti-microbial can be administered to a patient either by itself, or in pharmaceutical compositions where it is mixed with suitable carriers or excipient(s). In treating an infection, a therapeutically effective amount of an agent or agents is administered. A therapeutically effective dose refers to that amount of the compound that results in amelioration of one or more symptoms of bacterial infection and/or a prolongation of patient survival or patient comfort.
[0147] Toxicity,. therapeutic and prophylactic efficacy of anti-microbials can be determined by standard pharmaceutical procedures in cell cultures and/or experimental organisms such as animals, e.g., for determining the LD50(the dose lethal to 50% of the population) and the ED50(the dose therapeutically effective in 50% of the population). The dose ratio between toxic and therapeutic effects is the therapeutic index and it can be expressed as the ratio LD50/ED50. Compounds which exhibit large therapeutic indices are preferred. The data obtained from these cell culture assays and animal studies can be used in formulating a range of dosage for use in humans. The dosage of such compounds lies preferably within a range of circulating concentrations that include the ED50with little or no toxicity. The dosage may vary within this range depending upon the dosage form employed and the route of administration utilized.
[0148] For any compound identified and used in the method of the invention, the therapeutically effective dose can be estimated initially from cell culture assays. Such information can be used to more accurately determine useful doses in organisms such as plants and animals, preferably mammals, and most preferably humans. Levels in plasma may be measured, for example, by HPLC or other means appropriate for detection of the particular compound.
[0149] The exact formulation, route of administration and dosage can be chosen by the individual physician in view of the patient's condition (see e.g. Fingl et. al., in The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 1975, Ch. 1 p.1).
[0150] It should be noted that the attending physician would know how and when to terminate, interrupt, or adjust administration due to toxicity, organ dysfunction, or other systemic malady. Conversely, the attending physician would also know to adjust treatment to higher levels if the clinical response were not adequate (precluding toxicity). The magnitude of an administered dose in the management of the disorder of interest will vary with the severity of the condition to be treated and the route of administration. The severity of the condition may, for example, be evaluated, in part, by standard prognostic evaluation methods. Further, the dose and perhaps dose frequency, will also vary according to the age, body weight, and response of the individual patient. A program comparable to that discussed above also may be used in veterinary or phyto medicine.
[0151] Depending on the specific infection target being treated and the method selected, such agents may be formulated and administered systemically or locally, i.e., topically. Techniques for formulation and administration may be found in Genaro, 1995, Remington's Pharmaceutical Science. Suitable routes may include, for example, oral, rectal, transdermal, vaginal, transmucosal, intestinal, parenteral, intramuscular, subcutaneous, or intramedullary injections, as well as intrathecal, intravenous, or intraperitoneal injections.
[0152] For injection, the agents of the invention may be formulated in aqueous solutions, preferably in physiologically compatible buffers such as Hanks' solution, Ringer's solution, or physiological saline buffer. For transmucosal administration, penetrants appropriate to the barrier to be permeated are used in the formulation. Such penetrants are generally known in the art.
[0153] Use of pharmaceutically acceptable carriers to formulate identified anti-microbials of the present invention into dosages suitable for systemic administration is within the scope of the invention. With proper choice of carrier and suitable manufacturing practice, the compositions of the present invention, in particular those formulated as solutions, may be administered parenterally, such as by intravenous injection. Appropriate compounds can be formulated readily using pharmaceutically acceptable carriers well known in the art into dosages suitable for oral administration. Such carriers enable the compounds of the invention to be formulated as tablets, pills, capsules, liquids, gels, syrups, slurries, suspensions and the like, for oral ingestion by a patient to be treated.
[0154] Agents intended to be administered intracellularly may be administered using techniques well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, such agents may be encapsulated into liposomes, then administered as described above. Liposomes are spherical lipid bilayers with aqueous interiors. All molecules present in an aqueous solution at the time of liposome formation are incorporated into the aqueous interior. The liposomal contents are both protected from the external microenvironment and, because liposomes fuse with cell membranes, are efficiently delivered into the cell cytoplasm. Additionally, due to their hydrophobicity, small organic molecules may be directly administered intracellularly.
[0155] Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for use in the present invention include compositions wherein the active ingredients are contained in an effective amount to achieve the intended purpose. Determination of the effective amounts is well within the capability of those skilled in the art.
[0156] In addition to the active ingredients, these pharmaceutical compositions may contain suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carriers comprising excipients and auxiliaries which facilitate processing of the active compounds into preparations which can be used pharmaceutically. The preparations formulated for oral administration may be in the form of tablets, dragees, capsules, or solutions, including those formulated for delayed release or only to be released when the pharmaceutical reaches the small or large intestine.
[0157] The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention may be manufactured in a manner that is itself known, e.g., by means of conventional mixing, dissolving, granulating, dragee-making, levitating, emulsifying, encapsulating, entrapping or lyophilizing processes.
[0158] Pharmaceutical formulations for parenteral administration include aqueous solutions of the active anti-microbial compounds in water-soluble form. Alternatively, suspensions of the active compounds may be prepared as appropriate oily injection suspensions. Suitable lipophilic solvents or vehicles include fatty oils such as sesame oil, or synthetic fatty acid esters, such as ethyl oleate or triglycerides, or liposomes. Aqueous injection suspensions may contain substances which increase the viscosity of the suspension, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sorbitol, or dextran. Optionally, the suspension may also contain suitable stabilizers or agents which increase the solubility of the compounds to allow for the preparation of highly concentrated solutions.
[0159] Pharmaceutical preparations for oral use can be obtained by combining the active compounds with solid excipient, optionally grinding a resulting mixture, and processing the mixture of granules, after adding suitable auxiliaries, if desired, to obtain tablets or dragee cores. Suitable excipients are, in particular, fillers such as sugars, including lactose, sucrose, mannitol, or sorbitol; cellulose preparations such as, for example, maize starch, wheat starch, rice starch, potato starch, gelatin, gum tragacanth, methyl cellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl-cellulose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, and/or polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). If desired, disintegrating agents may be added, such as the cross-linked polyvinyl pyrrolidone, agar, or alginic acid or a salt thereof such as sodium alginate.
[0160] Dragee cores are provided with suitable coatings. For this purpose, concentrated sugar solutions may be used, which may optionally contain gum arabic, talc, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, carbopol gel, polyethylene glycol, and/or titanium dioxide, lacquer solutions, and suitable organic solvents or solvent mixtures. Dyestuffs or pigments may be added to the tablets or dragee coatings for identification or to characterize different combinations of active compound doses.
[0161] Pharmaceutical preparations which can be used orally include push-fit capsules made of gelatin, as well as soft, sealed capsules made of gelatin and a plasticizer, such as glycerol or sorbitol. The push-fit capsules can contain the active ingredients in admixture with filler such as lactose, binders such as starches, and/or lubricants such as talc or magnesium stearate and, optionally, stabilizers. In soft capsules, the active compounds may be dissolved or suspended in suitable liquids, such as fatty oils, liquid paraffin, or liquid polyethylene glycols. In addition, stabilizers may be added.
[0162] The above methodologies may be employed either actively or prophylactically against an infection of interest.
[0163] To identify DNA segments of Staph Abacteriophages 3A, 77 and 96 capable of acting as anti-microbial agents, a strategy described in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/407,804 filed Sep. 28, 1999, and PCT International Application No. PCT/IB99/02040 was employed. In essence, the procedure involved sequence characterization of the bacteriophage, identification of protein coding regions (open reading frames or ORFs), subcloning of all ORFs into an appropriate inducible expression vector, transfer of the ORF subclones into Staph. A, followed by induction of ORF expression and assessment of effect on growth. We employed discovery steps as described in the Examples.
EXAMPLE I
Growth of
[0164] The Staphylococcus aureuspropagating strain (PS 3A, 77 and 96) (Laboratory Center for Disease Control. (CDC) Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario) were used as host to propagate their respective phages 3A, 77 and 96, also obtained from the CDC. Two rounds of plaque purification of phages were performed on soft agar essentially as described in Sambrook et al (1989). Briefly, the PS 3A, 77 and 96 strains were grown overnight at 37° C. in Nutrient broth [NB: 0.3% Bacto beef extract, 0.5% Bacto peptone (Difco Laboratories) and 0.5% NaCl (w/v)]. The culture was then diluted 20× in NB and incubated at 37° C. until the OD540=0.2 (early log phase) with constant agitation. In order to obtain single plaques, phages 3A, 77 or 96 were subjected to 10-fold serial dilutions using phage buffer (1 mM MgSO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 80 mM NaCl and 0.1% Gelatin (w/v)) and 10 μl of each dilution was used to infect 0.5 ml of the cell suspension in the presence of 400 μg/ml CaCl2. After incubation of 15 min at room temperature (RT), 2 ml of melted soft agar kept at 45° C. (NB supplemented with 0.6% agar) was added to the mixture and poured onto the surface of 100 mm nutrient agar plates (0.3% Bacto Beef extract, 0.5% Bacto peptone, 0.5% NaCl and 1.5% Bacto agar (w/v)). After overnight incubation at 30° C., a single plaque was isolated, resuspended in 1 ml of phage buffer by end over end rotation for 2 hrs at 20° C., and the phage suspension was diluted and used for a second infection as described above. After overnight incubation at 30° C., a single plaque was isolated and used as a stock.
[0165] The propagation procedure for bacteriophages 3A, 77 and 96 was modified from the agar layer method of Swanstörm and Adams (1951). Briefly, the respective PS strains were grown to stationary phase overnight at 37° C. in Nutrient broth. Each culture was then diluted twenty-fold in NB and incubated at 37° C. until the OD540=0.2. The suspension (15×107Bacteria) was then mixed with 15×105plaque forming units (pfu) to give a ratio of 100-bacteria/phage particle in the presence of 400 μg/ml of CaCl2. After incubation for 15 min at 20° C., 7.5 ml of melted soft agar (NB plus 0.6% agar) were added to the mixture and poured onto the surface of 150 mm nutrient agar plates and incubated 16 hrs at 37° C. To collect the phage plate lysate, 20 ml of NB were added to each plate and the soft agar layer was collected by scrapping off with a clean microscope slide followed by shaking of the agar suspension for 5 min to break up the agar. The mixture was then centrifuged for 10 min at 4,000 RPM (2,830×g) in a JA-10 rotor (Beckman) and the supernatant fluid (lysate) was collected and subjected to a treatment with 10 μg /ml of DNase I and RNase A for 30 min at 37° C. To precipitate the phage particles, the phage suspension was adjusted to 10% (w/v) PEG 8000 and 0.5 M of NaCl followed by incubation at 4° C. for 16 hrs. The phage was recovered by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm (3,500×g) for 20 min at 4° C. on a GS-6R table top centrifuge (Beckman). The pellet was resuspended with 2 ml of phage buffer (1 mM MgSO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 80 mM NaCl and 0.1% Gelatin). The phage suspension was extracted with 1 volume of chloroform and further purified by centrifugation on a cesium chloride step gradient as described in Sambrook et al. (1989), using a TLS 55 rotor centrifuged in an Optima TLX ultracentrifuge (Beckman) for 2 h at 28,000 rpm (67,000×g) at 4° C. Banded phage was collected and ultracentrifuged again on an isopycnic cesium chloride gradient (1.45 g/ml) at 40,000 rpm (64,000×g) for 24 h at 4° C. using a TLV rotor (Beckman). The phage was harvested and dialyzed for 4 h at room temperature against 4 L of dialysis buffer consisting of 10 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8] and 10 mM MgCl2. Phage DNA was prepared from the phage suspension by adding 20 mM EDTA, 50 ug/ml Proteinase K and 0.5% SDS and incubating for 1 h at 65° C., followed by successive extractions with 1 volume of phenol, 1 volume of phenol-chloroform and 1 volume of chloroform. The DNA was then dialyzed overnight at 4° C. against 4 L of TE (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA).
EXAMPLE II
DNA Sequencing of Bacteriophage 3A, 77 and 96 Genomes
[0166] Four micrograms of phage DNA was diluted in 200 μl of TE, 1 mM EDTA in a 1.5 ml eppendorf tube and sonication was performed (550 Sonic Dismembrator™, Fisher Scientific). Samples were sonicated under an amplitude of 3 μm with bursts of 5 s spaced by 15 s cooling in ice/water for 3 to 4 cycles. The sonicated DNA was then size fractionated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels utilizing TAE (1×TAE is: 40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) as the running buffer. Fractions ranging from 1 to 2 kbp were excised from the agarose gel and purified using a commercial DNA extraction system according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Qiagen), with a final elution of 50 μl of 1 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.5].
[0167] The ends of the sonicated DNA fragments were repaired with a combination of T4 DNA polymerase and the Klenow fragment of E. coliDNA polymerase 1, as follows. Reactions were performed in a reaction mixture (final volume, 100 μl) containing sonicated phage DNA, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 50 μg/ml BSA, 100 μM of each dNTP and 15 units of T4 DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) for 20 min at 12° C. followed by addition of 12.5 units of Klenow large fragment (New England Biolabs) for 15 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by two phenol/chloroform extractions and the DNA was precipitated with ethanol and the final DNA pellet was resuspended in 20 μl of H2O.
[0168] Blunt-ended DNA fragments were cloned by ligation directly into the Hinc II site of pKSII+ vector (Stratagene) dephosphorylated by treatment with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (New England Biolabs). A typical ligation reaction contained 100 ng of vector DNA, 2 to 5 μl of repaired sonicated phage DNA (50-100 ng) in a final volume of 20 μl containing 800 units of T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs) and was incubated overnight at 16° C. Transformation and selection of bacterial clones containing recombinant plasmids was performed in E. coliDH10β according to standard procedures (Sambrook et al., 1989).
[0169] Recombinant clones were picked from agar plates into 96-well plates containing 100 μl LB and 100 μg/ml ampicillin and incubated at 37° C. The presence of phage DNA insert was confirmed by PCR amplification using T3 and T7 primers flanking the Hinc II cloning site of the pKS II+ vector. PCR amplification of foreign insert was performed in a 15 μl reaction volume containing 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3], 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.02% gelatin, 1 μM primer, 187.5 μM each dNTP, and 0.75 units Taq polymerase (BRL). The thermocycling parameters were as follows: 2 min initial denaturation at 94° C. for 2 min, followed by 20 cycles of 30 sec denaturation at 94° C., 30 sec annealing at 57° C., and 2 min extension at 72° C., followed by a single extension step at 72° C. for 10 min. Clones with insert sizes of 1 to 2 kbp were selected and plasmid DNA was prepared from the selected clones using QIAprep™ spin miniprep kit (Qiagen).
[0170] The nucleotide sequence of the extremities of each recombinant clone was determined using an ABI 377-36 automated sequencer with two types of chemistry:ABI prism Big Dye™ primer cycle sequencing (21M13 primer: #403055)(M13REV primer: #403056) or ABI prism Big Dye™ terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (Applied Biosystems, #4303152). To ensure co-linearity of the sequence data and the genome, all regions of phage genome were sequenced at least once from both directions on two separate clones. In areas that this criteria was not initially met, a sequencing primer was selected and phage DNA was used directly as sequencing template employing ABI prism Big Dye™ terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit.
EXAMPLE III
Bioinformatic Management of Primary Nucleotide Sequence
[0171] Sequence contigs were assembled using Sequencher™ 3.1 software (GeneCodes). To close contig gaps, sequencing primers were selected near the edge of the contigs. Phage DNA was used directly as sequencing template employing ABI prism BIG DYE™ terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit. The complete sequences of bacteriophages 3A, 77 and 96 are shown in Table 1.
[0172] A software program was developed and used on the assembled sequence of the bacteriophages to identify all putative ORFs larger than 33 codons. Other ORF identification software can also be utilized, preferably programs which allow alternative start codons. The software scans the primary nucleotide sequence starting at nucleotide #1 for an appropriate start codon. Three possible selections can be made for defining the nature of the start codon; I) selection of ATG, II) selection of ATG or GTG, and III) selection of either ATG, GTG, TTG, CTG, ATT, ATC, and ATA. This latter initiation codon set corresponds to the one reported by the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Taxonomy/wprintyc?mode=c) for the bacterial genetic code.
[0173] When an appropriate start codon is encountered, a counting mechanism is employed to count the number of codons (groups of three nucleotides) between this start codon and the next stop codon downstream of it. If a threshold value of 33 is reached, or exceeded, then the sequence encompassed by these two codons (start and stop codons) is defined as an ORF. This procedure is repeated, each time starting at the next nucleotide following the previous stop codon found, in order to identify all the other putative ORFs. The scan is performed on all three reading frames of both DNA strands of the phage sequence.
[0174] Sequence homology (BLAST) searches for each ORF are then carried out using an implementation of BLAST programs, although any of a variety of different sequence comparison and matching programs can be utilized as known to those skilled in the art. Downloaded public databases used for sequence analysis include:
[0175] i) non-redundant GenBank (ftp://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/db/nr.Z),
[0176] ii) Swissprot (ftp://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/db/swissprot.Z);
[0177] iii) vector (ftp://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/db/vector.Z);
[0178] iv) pdbaa databases (ftp://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/db/pdbaa.Z);
[0179] v) staphylococcus aureusNCTC 8325 (ftp://ftp.genome.ou.edu/pub/staph/staph-1k.fa);
[0180] vi) streptococcus pyogenes(ftp://ftp.genome.ou.edu/pub/strep/strep-1k.fa);
[0181] vii) streptococcus pneumoniae
[0182] (ftp://ftp.tigr.org/pub/data/s_neumoniae/gsp.contigs. 112197.Z);
[0183] viii) mycobacterium tuberculosisCSU#9
[0184] (ftp://ftp.tigr.org/pub/data/m_tuberculosis/TB—091097.Z) and ix)
[0185] pseudomonas aeruginosa
[0186] (http://www.genome.washington.edu/pseudo/data.html).
[0187] The results of the homology searches performed on the bacteriophage 3A, 77 and 96 ORFs are shown in Table 4.
EXAMPLE IV
Subcloning of Bacteriophage 3A, 77 and 96 ORFs into a
[0188] Preparation of the Shuttle Expression Vectors
[0189] The shuttle vector pT0021, in which the firefly luciferase (lucFF) expression is controlled by the ars (arsenite) promoter/operator (Tauriainen et al., 1997), was modified as below to suit our specific application. Two oligonucleotides were synthesized. The sense strand sequence (with XhoI cloning site) is: 5′-AATTCTCGAGTAAAATAACAT-3′ (SEQ ID NO. 1); the antisense strand sequence (with a BamHI cloning site) is: 5′-CGGGATCCGCCTCCTTTTCTCAACAGTCACCTGATTT-3′ (SEQ ID NO. 2). The two oligonucleotides were used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of pT0021 vector. The PCR product was gel purified using the Qiagen kit as described, and digested with XhoI and BamHI. The digested PCR product was again gel purified, ligated into XhoI and BamHI digested pT0021 vector, and used to transform E. colibacterial strain DH10β (as described above). This manipulation results in the construction of a pT0021-intermediated vector containing a RBS sequence located immediately upstream of the BamHI cloning site. Two other oligonucleotides were synthesized. The sense strand sequence (with BamHI cloning site) is: 5′-CGGGATCCATGAGGGGTTCCGAAGACG-3′ (SEQ ID NO. 3); the antisense strand sequence (with a HindIII cloning site) is: 5′-CCCAAGCTTACAATTTGGACTTTC-3′ (SEQ ID NO. 4). The two oligonucleotides were used for PCR amplification of pT0021-intermediated vector. The PCR product was gel purified and digested with BamHI and HindIII. The digested PCR product was then gel purified as described, ligated into BamHI and HindIII digested pT0021-intermediated vector, and used to transform E. colibacterial strain DH10β. This modified shuttle vector containing the ATG of the lucFF gene located immediately downstream of the BamHI cloning site was named pTM. A diagram outlining our modification of pT0021 to generate pTM is shown in FIG. 1A. The pTMSM vector is a modified version of the pTM vector containing the SalI and MluI cloning sites replacing the HindIII cloning site as shown in FIG. 1B. These modified shuttle vectors contain the arsenite inducible promoter/operator and the arsR gene.
[0190] As another example of inducible promotor, the arsenite-inducible promotor and the asrR gene from the pTMSM vector were replaced by a lactose-inducible promotor and the lacR gene from Staphylococcus aureus. The S. aureusgene encoding for the repressor of the lac operon (lacR) is found immediately upstream of the promoter-proximal end of the the lacA-G genes. Two oligonucleotides corresponding to a 2.18 kb-DNA region encompassing the lacR and the lac operon promotor region were synthesized. The sense strand sequence is: 5′-ccgctcgagCTCCAAATTCCAAAACAG-3′ (SEQ ID NO. 11) (with a XhoI cloning site, ctcgag); the antisense strand sequence is: 5′-cgggatccAATAAGACTCCTTTTTAC-3′ (SEQ ID NO. 12) (with a BamHI cloning site, ggatcc). These two oligonucleotides were used for the PCR amplification of Staphylococcus aureusDNA. The PCR product was gel purified and digested with XhoI and BamHI. The digested PCR product was also gel purified, ligated into XhoI and BamHI-digested pTMSM vector, and used to transform E. colibacterial strain DH10β. In the resulting vector, pTMSLac, the firefly luciferase (lucFF) expression is under the control of the S. aureuslac operon promoter/operator. Recombinant pTMSLac clones were picked and the sequence integrity of the 2.1 8 kb-lac operon region (lacR+lac promotor) was verified directly by DNA sequencing. A diagram outlining the pTMSLac vector characteristics is shown in FIG. 1D.
[0191] For the analysis of the inhibitory ORFs expression in S. aureus, the pT0021 vectors was modified in the following fashion. Two oligonucleotides corresponding to a short antigenic peptide derived from the heamaglutinin protein of influenza virus (HA epitope tag) were synthesized (Field et al., 1988). The sense strand HA tag sequence (with BamHI, SalI and HindIII cloning sites) is: 5′-gatcccggtcgaccaagcttTACCCATACGACGTCCCAGACTACGCCAGCTGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO. 9) (where upper case letters denote the nucleotide sequence of the HA tag); the antisense strand HA tag sequence (with a HindIII cloning site) is: 5′-agctTCAGCTGGCGTAGTCTGGGACGTCGTATGGGTAaagcttggtcgaccgg-3′ (SEQ ID NO. 10) (where upper case letters denote the sequence of the HA tag). The two HA tag oligonucleotides were annealed and ligated into pT0021 vector which had been digested with BamHI and HindIII. This manipulation resulted in replacement of the lucFF gene by the HA tag. This modified shuttle vector containing the arsenite inducible promoter, the arsR gene, and HA tag was named pTHA. A diagram outlining our modification of pT0021 to generate pTHA is shown in FIG. 1C.
[0192] Cloning of ORFs With a Shine-Dalgarno Sequence.
[0193] Individual ORF, encoded by Bacteriophages 3A, 77 and 96, larger than 33 amino acids and having a Shine-Dalgarno sequence upstream of the initiation codon was selected for functional analysis. In total, 52 ORFs from phage 3A, 99 ORFs from phage 77 and 45 ORFs from phage 96 were selected and screened as detailed below. A list of these is presented in FIG. 4A. Each individual ORF, from initiation codon to stop codon was amplified from phage genomic DNA using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For PCR amplification of ORFs, each sense strand primer targets the initiation codon and is preceded by a BamHI restriction site (5′-cgggatcc-3′) and each antisense oligonucleotide targets the stop codon of the ORF and is preceded by a HindIII restriction site (5′-cccaagctt-3′) The PCR product of each ORF was purified using the Quiagen kit as described and digested with BamHI and HindIII. The digested PCR product was also purified using the Quiagen kit, ligated into BamHI and HindIII digested pTM vector and used to transform E. colibacterial strain DH10β (as described above). As a result of this manipulation, the ORF is under the control of the arsenite-inducible promotor. Recombinant pTM/ORF clones were picked and their insert sizes were confirmed by PCR analysis using primers flanking the cloning site. The names and sequences of the primers that were used for the PCR amplification were: HAF: 5′-TATTATCCAAAACTTGAACA-3′ (SEQ ID NO. 14); HAR: 5′-CGGTGGTATATCCAGTGATT-3′ (SEQ ID NO. 15). The sequence integrity of cloned ORFs was verified directly by DNA sequencing using primers HAF and HAR. In cases where verification of ORF sequence could not be achieved by one pass with the sequencing primers, additional internal primers were selected and used for sequencing. In cases of ORF harboring internal HindIII site in their sequence, SalI instead of HindIII cloning site was used for the ORF cloning into the BamHI and SalI digested pTMSM vector. For the cloning into the lactose-inducible vector, the ORFs were excised from pTMSM vector by BamHI and SalI digestion and ligated to the same cloning sites into pTMSLac vector.
[0194] For the cloning into pTHA vector, each inhibitory ORF, from initiation codon to last codon (excluding the stop codon), was amplified from phage genomic DNA using the PCR. For PCR amplification of ORFs, each sense strand primer targets the initiation codon and is preceded by a BamHI restriction site (5′-cgggatcc-3′) and each antisense oligonucleotide targets the pentultimate codon (the one before the stop codon) of the ORF and is preceded by a Sal I restriction site (5′-gcgtcgaccg-3′) SEQ ID NO. 36). The PCR product of each ORF was gel purified and digested with BamHI and SalI. The digested PCR product was purified using the Qiagen kit as described, ligated into BaHI and SalI digested pTHA vector, and used to transform E. colibacterial strain DH10β. As a result of this manipulation, the HA tag is set inframe with the ORF and is positioned at the carboxy terminus of each ORF (pTHA/ORF clones). Recombinant pTHA/ORF clones were picked and their insert sizes were confirmed as described above.
EXAMPLE V
Functional Assay for Bacterial Inhibitory Activity of Bacteriophage 3A, 77 and 96 ORFs
[0195] Transformation of Staphylococcus aureusWith Expression Construct Staphylococcus aureusstrain RN4220 (Kreiswirth et al., 1983) was used as a recipient for the expression of recombinant plasmids. Electoporation was performed essentially as previously described (Schenk and Laddaga, 1992). Selection of recombinant clones was performed on Luria-Broth agar (LB-agar) plates containing 30 μg/ml of kanamycin.
[0196] For each ORF introduced in the pTM vector, 3 independent transformants were isolated and used to individually inoculate cultures in 5 ml of TSB containing 30 μg/ml kanamycin, followed by growth to saturation (16 hrs at 37° C.). An aliquot of this stationary phase culture was used to generate a frozen glycerol stock of the transformant (stored at −80° C.). With certain phage ORF, e.g. by phage 77 ORF 1 and 96 ORF 78, no S. aureustransformants could be obtained following cloning into pTM or pTMSM vector. In these cases, phage ORFs were cloned in alternative vectors pTHA and pTMSLac.
[0197] The presence of individual phage 3A, 77 or 96 ORF DNA inserts in the plasmid was verified by PCR amplification using 1.5 μl transformant miniprep DNA in a PCR with primers flanking the cloning site of ORF in pTM vector (HAF and HAR). The composition of the PCR reaction and the cycling parameters are identical to those employed for library screening described above.
[0198] Induction of Gene Expression From the ars- and lac-Inducible Promotors
[0199] Sodium arsenite (NaAsO2) was purchased from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich Canada LTD, Oakville) and was used as heavy metals to induce gene expression from the ars promoter/operator in solid and liquid medium assays.
[0200] The lactose (lac) genes of Staphylococcus aureushave been shown to be inducible with the addition of either lactose or galactose to the culture medium (Oskouian & Stewart, 1990, J. Bacteriol. 172 3804-3812). Galactose (2%w/v) was used to induce the gene expression from the lac promotor/operator in liquid assay.
[0201] At pre-determined times, sodium arsenite or galactose was added to the culture to induce transcription of the phage ORFs cloned immediately downstream from an arsenite-inducible promoter in the expression plasmids pTM, pTMSM or pTHA, or a lactose-inducible promotor in the expression plasmid pTMSLac. The anti-microbial activity of individual phage 3A, 77 and 96 ORFs was monitored by two growth inhibitory assays, one on solid agar medium, the other in liquid medium.
[0202] a-Screening on Semi-solid Support Media
[0203] ORFs were first screened by the functional assay on semi-solid medium as outlined in FIG. 3A. Cells containing different recombinant plasmids were grown overnight at 37° C. in LB medium supplemented with 30 μg/ml of kanamycin. The cells were then diluted and the identification of inhibitory ORFs was performed by spotting 3 ul of each dilution of S. aureustransformed cells containing phage 3A, 77 or 96 ORFs onto agar plates containing increasing concentrations of sodium arsenite (0; 2.5; 5; and 7.5 μM) and Kanamycin. The plates were incubated overnight at 37° C., after which a growth inhibition of the ORF transformants on plates that contain arsenite are compared to plates without arsenite. Noninduced and induced cultures of S aureustransformed with a non-inhibitory ORF (44AHJD bacteriophage ORF 114 cloned into pTM vector) were included as negative control. The 44AHJD ORF 114 amino acids residue composition from N-terminal to C-terminal is:MVNVDNAPEEKGQAYTEMLQLFNKLIQWNPAYTFDNAINLLSACQQLLLNYNSSVVQFLNDE LNNETKPESILSYIAGDDPIEQWNMHKGFYETYNVYVF (SEQ ID NO. 16).
[0204] Results of the bacteriophage ORFs tested for functional assay on semi-solid media are listed in FIG. 4A. Among them, induction of expression of phage 3A ORF 33, 41 or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48 or 100 results in the inhibition of growth of the S. aureustransformants. FIG. 4B shows the result of growth inhibition with three clones of S. aureusexpressing these inhibitory ORFs or the control non-inhibitory 44AHJD ORF 114.
[0205] b-Quantification of Growth inhibition in Liquid Medium
[0206] As outlined in FIG. 3B, the effect of ORF induction on bacterial growth inhibition was then further quantitated by functional assay in liquid medium. Cells containing phage 3A ORF 33, 41 or 79, phage 77 ORF 1, or phage 96 ORF 48, 78 or 100 were grown for overnight at 37° C. in LB medium supplemented with the appropriate antibiotic selection. These cultures were 50-fold dilution with fresh media containing kanamycin and the growth was continued for 2 h at 37° C. The same OD565equivalent of cultures (approximately 1 ml) was added to 19 ml of fresh media containing kanamycin and transferred to a 125 ml-Erlenmeyer flask. The cultures were incubated for an additional 4 hrs at 37° C. in the absence or in the presence of inducer (sodium arsenite at the final concentrations of 5.0 μM or 2.0% galactose). During that period of time, the effect of expression of the phage 3A, 77 and 96 ORFs on bacterial cell growth was monitored, at each 40 min, by measuring the OD565and the number of colony forming units (CFU) in the cultures containing or not the inducer. The number of CFU was evaluated as followed. Cultures were serially diluted and aliquots from induced and uninduced cultures were plated out on agar plates containing an appropriate antibiotic selection but lacking inducer. Following incubation overnight at 37° C., the number of colonies was counted. Cultures of S aureustransformed with a non-inhibitory ORF (44AHJD bacteriophage ORF 114 cloned into pTM vector) were included as control.
[0207] As shown in FIG. 5, for each inhibitory ORFs, the number of CFU increased over time under non-induced conditions. Similar growth rates were also observed with transformants harboring non-inhibitory ORFs under both induced and non-induced conditions. Transformants of S.aureusharboring C) phage 3A ORF 79 or D) phage 77 ORF 1 showed a significantly lower growth rate compared to their respective control cultures grown under non-induced conditions. Induction of expression of E) phage 96 ORF 100 was cytostatic. In contrast, four phage ORFs were cytocidal for bacterial growth. The expression of B) phage 3A ORF 41 resulted in a very rapid decrease in the number of viable cells as assayed as CFU. A 2 log reduction in the number of CFU after 1 hr of growth compared to the number of CFU initially present in the same culture was observed following induction of 3A ORF 41 with sodium arsenite. At 4 hr following induction, the number of viable cells relative to uninduced cultures was reduced by either 2 logs (phage 3A ORF 33 (A)), 1 log (phage 96 ORF 48 (D)), or 0.5 log (phage 96 ORF 78 (E)).
[0208] The presence of four phage ORFs were cytocydal for the bacterial growth. The expression of B) phage 3A ORF 41 results in a very rapid decrease in the number of CFU. A 2 log reduction in the number of CFU compared to the number of CFU initially present in the same culture was observed at 1 h following induction with sodium arsenite.
[0209] At 4 h following induction with sodium arsenite, the expression of A) phage 3A ORF 33 results in a 2 log reduction in the number of CFU compared to the number of CFU initially present in the same culture. The expression of D) phage 96 ORF 48 results in a log reduction in the number of CFU compared to the number of CFU initially present in the same culture.
[0210] At 4 h following induction of the expression of E) phage 96 ORF 78 with galactose a half log reduction in the number of CFU compared to the number of CFU initially present in the same culture was observed.
EXAMPLE VI
Phage ORF Protein Expression Analysis in
[0211] The level of expression of the inhibitory ORFs was measured by performing Western blot analyses. Staphylococcus aureusstrain RN4220 was electroporated with each inhibitory ORFs cloned into pTHA vector as described above. Cells containing different recombinant plasmids were grown for overnight at 37° C. in TSB (Tryptic soy broth, DIFCO) medium in the presence of 30 μg/ml kanamycin. The overnight cultures were subjected to a 50-fold dilution with fresh media containing kanamycin and the growth was continued for 2 h at 37° C. At the end, cells were diluted with fresh TSB medium containing or not 5.0 μM of Sodium Arsenite, in the presence of kanamycin and incubated at 37° C. for an additional 3.5 h. The same OD565equivalent of cultures was centrifuged at 3000 g for 5 min and washed with 20 ml of TBS buffer (140 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) containing protease inhibitors (1 mM of each phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and N-ethylmalemyde (NEM)). For lysis, cell pellets were resuspend in 25 μl with TBS buffer containing 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NEM, 20 μg of each DNAse I and RNase A and 50 Units/ml of lysostaphin, and incubated at 37° C. for 1 h. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 25 μl of 2×SDS buffer (100 mM Tris pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 200 mM DTT, 20% Glycerol and 0.2% Bromophenol blue). Cell lysates were boiled for 10 min, centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 g and 10-15 μl of the lysates were loaded onto a 15-18% SDS-page using Tris-Glycine-SDS as a running buffer (3.03 g of Tris HCl, 14.4 g of Glycine and 0.1% SDS per liter). After migration, proteins were transferred onto an immobilon-P membrane (PVDF, Millipore) using Tris-Glycin-Methanol as a transfer buffer (3.03 g Tris, 14.4 Glycine and 200 ml Methanol per liter) for 2 hrs at 4° C. at 100 V. PVDF membrane was pretreated in methanol for 30 s, washed 4-5 times with H2O and soaked in transfer buffer.
[0212] After the transfer, the membrane was blocked in 20 ml of TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBST), 5% skim milk and 0.5% gelatin for 1 hr at room temperature and then, a pre-blocking antibody (ChromPureRabbit IgG, Jackson immunoResearch lab. #011-000-003) was added at a dilution of 1/750 and incubated for 1 hr at room temperature or ON at 4° C. Membrane was washed 6 times for 5 min in TBST at room temperature. The primary antibody (murine mono-HA antibody, Babco # MMS-101 P) directed against the HA epitope tag and diluted 1/1000 was then added and incubated for 3 h at room temperature in the presence of 5% Skim Milk and 0.5% Gelatin. Membrane was washed 6 times for 5 min in TBST at room temperature. A secondary antibody (anti-mouse IgG, peroxidase-linked species-specific whole antibody, Amersham # NA 931) diluted 1/1500 (7.5 μl in 10 ml) was then added and incubated for 1 hr at room temperature. After 6 washes in TBST, the membrane was briefly dried and then, the substrate (Chemiluminescence reagent plus, Mandel # NEL104) was added to the membrane and incubated for I min at room temperature. The membrane was briefly dried and exposed to x-ray film (Kodak, Biomax MS/MR ) for different periods of time (30 s to 10 min). As shows in FIG. 6, the presence of sodium arsenite in the cultures induces the expression of proteins corresponding to the phage 3A ORF 33, 41 and 79, phage 77 ORF 1, and phage 96 ORF 48, 78 and 100.
References
[0213] Cohen, M. L. (1992). Science 257: 1050-1055.
[0214] Rusterholtz, K., and Pohlschroder, M. (1999). Cell 96, 469-470.
[0215] Ackermann, H.-W. and DuBow, M. S. (1987). Viruses of Prokaryotes. CRC Press. Volumes 1 and 2.
[0216] Durfee, T., Becherer, K., Chen, P.-L., Yeh, S.-H., Yang, Y., Kilburn, A. E., Lee, W.-H., and Elledge, S. J. (1993). Genes & Dev. 7: 555-569.
[0217] Sopta, M., Carthew, R. W., and Greenblatt, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 260: 10353-10369.
[0218] Qin, J., Fenyo, D., Zhao, Y., Hall, W. W., Chao, D. M., Wilson, C. J., Young, R. A. and Chait, B. T. (1997). Anal. Chem. 69: 3995-4001.
[0219] Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T (1989). Molecular cloning: A laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
[0220] Swanström, M. and Adams, M. H. (1951). Agar layer method for production of high titer phage stocks. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. & Med. 78: 372-375.
[0221] Tauriainen, S., Karp, M., Chang, W and Virta, M. (1997). Recombinant luminescent bacteria for measuring bioavailable arsenite and antimonite. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4456-4461.
[0222] Field, J., Nikawa, J.-I., Broek, D., MacDonald, B., Rodgers, L., Wilson, I. A., Lemer, R. A., and Wigler, M. (1988). Purification of a RAS-responsive adenylyl cyclase complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiaeby use of an epitope addition method. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 2159-2165.
[0223] Kreiswirth, B N., Lofdahl, S., Belley, M J., O'Reilly, M., Shlievert, P M., Bergdoll, M S. and Novicks, R P. 1983. Nature #305: 709-712.
[0224] Schenk, S. and Laddaga, R A. 1992. FEMS Microbiology Letters #94: 133-138.
[0225] Oskouian, B. and Stewart, G S. 1990. J. Bacteriol. #172: 3804-3812.
[0226] All patents and publications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the levels of skill of those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. All references cited in this disclosure are incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference had been incorporated by reference in its entirety individually.
[0227] One skilled in the art would readily appreciate that the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objects and obtain the ends and advantages mentioned, as well as those inherent therein. The specific methods and compositions described herein as presently representative of preferred embodiments are exemplary and are not intended as limitations on the scope of the invention. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that Bacteriophages 3A, 77 and 96 ORFs described herein are provided and discussed by way of example, and other the ORFs of Bacteriophages 3A, 77 and 96, including amino acid sequences and nucleic acid sequences which encode products, are within the scope of the present invention. Changes therein and other uses will occur to those skilled in the art which are encompassed within the spirit of the invention are defined by the scope of the claims.
[0228] It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that varying substitutions and modifications may be made to the invention disclosed herein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may suitably be practiced using a variety of different expression vectors and sequencing methods within the general descriptions provided.
[0229] The invention illustratively described herein suitably may be practiced in the absence of any element or elements, limitation or limitations which is not specifically disclosed herein. Thus, for example, in each instance herein any of the terms “comprising,” “consisting essentially of” and “consisting of” may be replaced with either of the other two terms. The terms and expressions which have been employed are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is not intention that in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed. Thus, it should be understood that although the present invention has been specifically disclosed by preferred embodiments and optional features, modification and variation of the concepts herein disclosed may be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and that such modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims.
[0230] In addition, where features or aspects of the invention are described in terms of Markush groups or other grouping of alternatives, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is also thereby described in terms of any individual member or subgroup of members of the Markush group or other group. For example, if there are alternatives A, B, and C, all of the following possibilities are included: A separately, B separately, C separately, A and B, A and C, B and C, and A and B and C.
[0231] Thus, additional embodiments are within the scope of the invention and within the following claims.
| TABLE 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 3rd | |||
| position | 2nd position | position |
| TABLE 3 |
|---|
| 3AORF033, Nucleotides and amino acids sequences (SEQ ID NO. 20) |
| TABLE 4 |
|---|
| Similarities with public sequences |
| TABLE 5 |
|---|
| Optimal global alignment |
[0232]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
[Inline image omitted. See PDF.]
Claims
Certificate of Correction present
The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.
What is claimed is:
1. An isolated, purified, or enriched polypeptide comprising at least a fragment of a protein encoded by Staphylococcus aureusbacteriophage 3A open reading frame 33, 41 or 79, a bacteriophage 77 open reading frame 1, or a bacteriophage 96 open reading frame 48, 78 or 100, wherein said fragment is at least 15, contiguous amino acid residues in length.
2. The polypeptide of claim 1, wherein said polypeptide comprises a fragment at least 30 amino acid residues in length of a said polypeptide normally encoded by said bacteriophage.
3. A novel protein which is encoded by a nucleic acid molecule which corresponds to a nucleic acid molecule from Staphylococcus aureusbacteriophages 3A, 77 or 96, as shown in SEQ ID Nos.: 17, 18 and 19, respectively.
4. The novel protein of claim 3, wherein said protein is isolated from a bacteriophage.
5. The polypeptide of claim 2, wherein said polypeptide comprises a fragment at least 50 amino acid residues in length of a said polypeptide normally encoded by said bacteriophage.
6. The polypeptide of claim 1, wherein said fragment binds to a bacterial polypeptide bound by a full-length protein encoded by said Staphylococcus aureusbacteriophage open reading frame.
7. The polypeptide of claim 1, wherein said polypeptide has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 31 (96ORF78).
8. The novel protein of claim 3, wherein said protein is encoded by a nucleic acid molecule having at least 50% identity with nucleic acids 10148 to 10363 of SEQ ID NO: 19.
9. An isolated, purified, or enriched polypeptide having at least 50% identity with the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 31 (96ORF78).
10. The polypeptide of claim 9, wherein said identity is at least 75%.
11. The polypeptide of claim 10, wherein said identity is at least 95%.
Patent Citations (12)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3691016(A) | 1972-09-01 | Patel | Applicant |
| US3969287(A) | 1976-07-01 | Jaworek et al. | Applicant |
| US4195128(A) | 1980-03-01 | Hildebrand et al. | Applicant |
| US4229537(A) | 1980-10-01 | Hodgins et al. | Applicant |
| US4247642(A) | 1981-01-01 | Hirohara | Applicant |
| US4330440(A) | 1982-05-01 | Ayers et al. | Applicant |
| EP72925(A2) | 1983-03-01 | Applicant | |
| EP748871(A1) | 1996-12-01 | Applicant | |
| EP786519(A2) | 1997-01-01 | Examiner | |
| EP786519(A2) | 1997-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO89/00199 | 1989-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO95/27043 | 1995-10-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (31)
- Adelman et al., “In Vitro Deletional Mutagenesis For Bacterial Production Of The 20,000-Dalton Form Of Human Pituitary Growth Hormone”, DNA, 2(3):183-93, 1983.Applicant
- Altshul et al., “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs”, Nucleic Acids Research, 1997, vol. 25, No. 17, pp. 3389-3402.Applicant
- Cohen, “Epidemiology of Drug Resistance: Implications for a Post-Antimicrobial Era”, ML Science, vol. 257, Aug. 21, 1992, pp. 1050-1055.Applicant
- Diaz et al., “Construction of a broad-host-range pneumococcal promoter-probe plasmid”, Gene, 90:163-167, 1990.Applicant
- Durfee et al., “The retinoblastoma protein associates with the protein phosphatase type 1 catalytic subunit”, Genes & Development, 7:555-569, 1993.Applicant
- Eichenbaum et al., “Use of Lactococcal nisA Promoter To Regulate Gene Expression in Gram-Positive Bacteria: Comparison of Induction Level and Promoter Strength”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64:2763-2769, 1998.Applicant
- Endo et al., “A new protein containing an SH2 domain that inhibits JAK kinases”, Nature, 387:921-924, 1997.Applicant
- Field et al., “Purifications Of A RAS-Responsive Adenylyl Cyclase Complex From Saccharomyces Cerevisiae By Use Of An Epitope Addition Method”, Mol. Cell. Biol., 8:2159-2165, 1988.Applicant
- Fink, “Where are the Limits of Life?”, Book Reviews, 322:469-470, 1998.Applicant
- Garvey et al., “The complete sequence of Bacillus phage Ø29 gene 16: a protein required for the genome encapsidation reaction”, Gene, 40:311-316, 1985.Applicant
- Gutierrez et al., “Signals in the Ø29 DNA-Terminal Protein Template for the Initiation of Phage Ø29 DNA Replication”, Virology, 155:474-483, 1986.Applicant
- Jorgensen et al., “Antimicrobial Resistance among Respiratory Isolates of Haemophilus influenza, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States”, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 34:2075-2080, 1990.Applicant
- Kaneko et al., “Complete nucleotide sequence and molecular characterization of the temperate staphylococcal bacteriophage ΦPVL carrying Pantom-Valentine leukocidin genes”, Genes 215:57-67, 1998.Applicant
- Karimova et al., “A Bacterial two-hybrid system based on a reconstituted signal transduction pathway”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 95:5752-5756, 1998.Applicant
- Katagari et al., “Multiple Possible Sites of BRCA2 Interacting With DNA Repair Protein RAD5 1”, Genes, Chromosomes & CaNCER, 21:217-222, 1998.Applicant
- Kreiswirth et al., “The Toxic Shock Syndrome Exotoxin Structural Gene Is Not Detectably Transmitted By A Prophage”, Nature, Oct. 20-26;305(5936):709-12, 1983.Applicant
- Kodaira et al., “The dnaX gene Encodes the DNA Polymerase III Holoenzyme τSubmit, the dnaZ Gene Product”, Mol Gene Genet, 192:80-86, 1983.Applicant
- Lee et al., “Escherichia coli DnaX Product, the τsubunit of DNA polymerase III, is a multifunctional protein with single-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase activity”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 84:2713-2717, 1987.Applicant
- Loessner et al., “The Two-Component Lysis System Of Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteriophage Twort: A Large TTG-Start Holin And An Associated Amidase Endolysin”, FEMS Microbiol Lett., May 15;162(2):265-74, 1998.Applicant
- Maki et al., “DNA Polymerase III Holoenzyme of Escherichica coli”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 263:6547-6554, 1988.Applicant
- Mancini et al., “Complementation of the fol2 Deletion in Sccharmoyces cerevisiae by Human and Escherichia coli Genes Encoding GTP Cyclohydrolase ”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 255:521-527, 1999.Applicant
- Martin et al., “Analysis of the Complete Nucleotide Sequence and Functional Organization of the Genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae Bacteriophage Cp-1”, Journal of Virology, 70:3678-3687, 1996.Applicant
- McDonnell et al., “Diplophage”: A Bacteriophage of Diplococcus pneumoniae , Virology, 63:577-582, 1975.Applicant
- Nardese et al., “Disruption of the GTP-Cyclohidrolase I Gene In Saccharomyces cerevisiae ”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 218:273-279, 1996.Applicant
- Neu, “The Crisis in Antibiotic Resistance”, Science, 257:1064-1073, 1992.Applicant
- Oskouian et al., “Repression And Catabolite Repression Of The Lactose Operon Of Staphylococcus Aureus ”, J. Bacteriol, Jul., 172(7):3804-12, 1990.Applicant
- Pickett et al., “Encapsidation of Heterologous RNAs by Bacteriophage MS2 Coat Protein”, Nucleic Acids Research, 21:4621-4626, 1993.Applicant
- Qin et al., “A Strategy for Rapid, High-Confidence Protein Identification”, Anal. Chem., 69:3995-4001, 1997.Applicant
- Qiu et al., “Dimerization by Translation Initiation Factor 2 Kinase GCN2 Is Mediated by Interactions in the C-Terminal Ribosome-Binding Region and the Protein Kinase Domain”, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 18:2697-2711, 1998.Applicant
- Reisinger et al., “Lambda Kil-Mediated Lysis Requirse the Phage Context”, Virology, 193:1033-1036, 1993.Applicant
- Rost et al., “Bridging The Protein Sequence-Structure Gap By Structure Predictions”, Annu. Rev.Biophys, Biomol. Struct., 25:113-36, 1996.Applicant