US 6,697,868 B2Grant
Protocol processing stack for use with intelligent network interface device
Issue Date:2004-02-24
•23 Claims
•4 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A host CPU runs a network protocol processing stack that provides instructions not only to process network messages but also to allocate processing of certain network messages to a specialized network communication device, offloading some of the most time consuming protocol processing from the host CPU to the network communication device. By allocating common and time consuming network processes to the device, while retaining the ability to handle less time intensive and more varied processing on the host stack, the network communication device can be relatively simple and cost effective. The host CPU, operating according to instructions from the stack, and the network communication device together determine whether and to what extent a given message is processed by the host CPU or by the network communication device.
Metadata
Assignee
- Alacritech, Inc.
Inventors
- Peter K. Craft
- Clive M. Philbrick
- Laurence B. Boucher
- David A. Higgen
Application Information
Application Number:US 10/208,093
Filing Date:2002-07-29
Priority Date:2000-02-28
Art Unit:7
Classifications
IPC:
G06F 1516
Field of Search:
709230709250709236709243709228709238
Patent Drawings (4 sheets)
Description
Cross Reference to Related Applications
[0002] The present application is a continuation and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/514,425, filed Feb. 28, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,427,171 which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of: a) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/141,713, filed Aug. 28, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,479, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of provisional application No. 60/098,296, filed Aug. 27, 1998; b) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/067,544, filed Apr. 27, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,226,680, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of provisional application No. 60/061,809, filed Oct. 14, 1997; and c) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/384,792, filed Aug. 27, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,434,620 which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of provisional application No. 60/098,296, filed Aug. 27, 1998.
[0003] The present application also claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/464,283, filed Dec. 15, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,427,173 which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/439,603, filed Nov. 12, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,247,060, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/067,544, filed Apr. 27, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,226,680, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of provisional application No. 60/061,809, filed Oct. 14, 1997.
[0004] The subject matter of all of the applications listed above and patents listed above is incorporated herein by reference.
Reference to Compact Disc Appendix
[0005] The Compact Disc Appendix (CD Appendix), which is a part of the present disclosure, includes three folders, designated CD Appendix A, CD Appendix B, and CD Appendix C on the compact disc. CD Appendix A contains a hardware description language (verilog code) description of an embodiment of a receive sequencer. CD Appendix B contains microcode executed by a processor that operates in conjunction with the receive sequencer of CD Appendix A. CD Appendix C contains a device driver executable on the host as well as ATCP code executable on the host. A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material (other than any portion of the “free BSD” stack included in CD Appendix C) which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner of that material has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights.
Technical Field
[0006] The present invention relates to the management of information communicated via a network, including protocol processing.
Background
[0007] Various individuals, companies and governments have worked for many years to provide communication over computer networks. As different computer and network architectures have been created, many types of protocols have evolved to facilitate that communication. Conventionally, network messages contain information regarding a number of protocol layers that allow information within the messages to be directed to the correct destination and decoded according to appropriate instructions, despite substantial differences that may exist between the computers or other devices transmitting and receiving the messages. Processing of these messages is usually performed by a central processing unit (CPU) running software instructions designed to recognize and manipulate protocol information contained in the messages.
[0008] With the increasing prevalence of network communication, a large portion of the CPU's time may be devoted to such protocol processing, interfering with other tasks the CPU may need to perform. Multiple interrupts to the CPU can also be problematic when transferring many small messages or for large data transfers, which are conventionally divided into a number of packets for transmission over a network.
Summary
[0009] In accordance with the present invention, means for offloading some of the most time consuming protocol processing from a host CPU to a specialized device designed for network communication processing are provided. The host has a protocol processing stack that provides instructions not only to process network messages but also to allocate processing of certain network messages to the specialized network communication device. By allocating some of the most common and time consuming network processes to the network communication device, while retaining the ability to handle less time intensive and more varied processing on the host stack, the network communication device can be relatively simple and cost effective. The host CPU, operating according to the instructions from the stack, and the specialized network communication device together determine whether and to what extent a given message is processed by the host CPU or by the network communication device.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0010] FIG. 1 is a schematic plan view of a host computer having an intelligent network interface card or communication processing device (INIC/CPD) connected to a remote host via a network.
[0011] FIG. 2 is a schematic plan view of a protocol processing stack of the present invention passing a connection context between host storage and the INIC/CPD.
[0012] FIG. 3 is a diagram of a general method employed to process messages received by the host computer via the INIC/CPD.
[0013] FIG. 4 illustrates a handout of the connection context from the host protocol processing stack to the INIC/CPD via a miniport driver installed in the host.
[0014] FIG. 5 shows a return of the connection context to the host protocol processing stack from the INIC/CPD via a miniport driver installed in the host.
[0015] FIG. 6 diagrams a control mechanism for transmitting a message via the fast-path.
[0016] FIG. 7 diagrams a control mechanism for receiving a message via the fast-path.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment
[0017] Referring now to FIG. 1, the present invention can operate in an environment including a host computer shown generally at 20 connected to a remote host 22 via a network 25. The host 20 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 28 and storage 35, while an intelligent network interface card or communication processing device (INIC/CPD) 30 provides an interface between the host and the network 25. A computer is defined in the present invention to be a device including a CPU, a memory and instructions for running the CPU. The network 25 is a medium for transmission of information from one computer to another, such as conductive wires, optical fibers or wireless space, including any supporting hardware or software such as switches and routers. Network implementations include local area networks, wide area networks, telecommunication networks and the Internet. The INIC/CPD 30 is depicted on a border of host 20 because the INIC/CPD provides a network interface that may be added with an adapter card, for example, or integrated as a part of the host computer. A bus 33 such as a peripheral component interface (PCI) bus provides a connection within the host 20 between the CPU 28, the INIC/CPD 30, and a storage device 35 such as a semiconductor memory or disk drive, along with any related controls.
[0018] Referring additionally to FIG. 2, the host CPU 28 runs a protocol processing stack 44 of instructions stored in storage 35, the stack including a data link layer 36, network layer 38, transport layer 40, upper layer 46 and an upper layer interface 42. A general description of these protocol layers can be found in the book by W. Richard Stevens entitled TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1 (13thprinting, 1999), which is incorporated herein by reference. The upper layer 46 may represent a session, presentation and/or application layer, depending upon the particular protocol being employed and message communicated. The upper layer interface 42, along with the CPU 28 and any related controls can send or retrieve data to or from the upper layer 46 or storage 35, as shown by arrow 48. The upper layer interface 42 may be called a Transport driver interface (TDI), for example, in accord with Microsoft terminology. A connection context 50 has been created, as will be explained below, the context summarizing various features of a message connection, such as the protocol types, source and destination addresses and status of the message. The context 50 may be passed between an interface for the session layer 42 and the INIC/CPD 30, as shown by arrows 52 and 54, and stored as a communication control block (CCB) of information in either an INIC/CPD 30 memory or storage 35.
[0019] When the INIC/CPD 30 holds a CCB defining a particular connection, data received by the INIC/CPD from the network and pertaining to the connection is referenced to that CCB and can then be sent directly to storage 35 according to a fast-path 58, bypassing sequential protocol processing by the data link 36, network 38 and transport 40 layers. Transmitting a message, such as sending a file from storage 35 to remote host 22, can also occur via the fast-path 58, in which case the context for the file data is added by the INIC/CPD 30 referencing the CCB, rather than by sequentially adding headers during processing by the transport 40, network 38 and data link 36 layers. The DMA controllers of the INIC/CPD 30 can perform these message transfers between INIC/CPD and storage 35.
[0020] The INIC/CPD 30 can collapse multiple protocol stacks each having possible separate states into a single state machine for fast-path processing. The INIC/CPD 30 does not handle certain exception conditions in the single state machine, primarily because such conditions occur relatively infrequently and to deal with them on the INIC/CPD would provide little performance benefit to the host. A response to such exceptions can be INIC/CPD 30 or CPU 28 initiated. The INIC/CPD 30 deals with exception conditions that occur on a fast-path CCB by passing back or flushing to the host protocol stack 44 the CCB and any associated message frames involved, via a control negotiation. The exception condition is then processed in a conventional manner by the host protocol stack 44. At some later time, usually directly after the handling of the exception condition has completed and fast-path processing can resume, the host stack 44 hands the CCB back to the INIC/CPD. This fallback capability enables most performance-impacting functions of the host protocols to be quickly processed by the specialized INIC/CPD hardware, while the exceptions are dealt with by the host stacks, the exceptions being so rare as to negligibly effect overall performance.
[0021] FIG. 3 diagrams a general flow chart for messages sent to the host via the network according to the current invention. A large TCP/IP message such as a file transfer may be received by the host from the network in a number of separate, approximately 64 KB transfers, each of which may be split into many, approximately 1.5 KB frames or packets for transmission over a network. Novel NetWare® protocol suites running Sequenced Packet Exchange Protocol (SPX) or NetWare® Core Protocol (NCP) over Internetwork Packet Exchange (IPX) work in a similar fashion. Another form of data communication which can be handled by the fast-path is Transaction TCP (hereinafter T/TCP or TTCP), a version of TCP which initiates a connection with an initial transaction request after which a reply containing data may be sent according to the connection, rather than initiating a connection via a several-message initialization dialogue and then transferring data with later messages. In general, any protocol for which a connection can be set up to define parameters for a message or plurality of messages between network hosts may benefit from the present invention. In any of the transfers typified by these protocols, each packet conventionally includes a portion of the data being transferred, as well as headers for each of the protocol layers and markers for positioning the packet relative to the rest of the packets of this message.
[0022] When a message packet or frame is received 47 from a network by the INIC/CPD, it is first validated by a hardware assist. This includes determining the protocol types of the various layers of the packet, verifying relevant checksums, and summarizing 57 these findings into a status word or words. Included in these words is an indication whether or not the frame is a candidate for fast-path data flow. Selection 59 of fast-path candidates is based on whether the host may benefit from this message connection being handled by the INIC/CPD, which includes determining whether the packet has header bytes denoting particular protocols, such as TCP/IP or SPX/IPX for example. The typically small percentage of frames that are not fast-path candidates are sent 61 to the host protocol stacks for slow-path protocol processing. Subsequent network microprocessor work with each fast-path candidate determines whether a fast-path connection such as a TCP or SPX CCB is already extant for that candidate, or whether that candidate may be used to set up a new fast-path connection, such as for a TTCP/IP transaction. The validation provided by the INIC/CPD provides advantages whether a frame is processed by the fast-path or a slow-path, as only error free, validated frames are processed by the host CPU even for the slow-path processing.
[0023] All received message frames which have been determined by the INIC/CPD hardware assist to be fast-path candidates are examined 53 by the network microprocessor or INIC comparator circuits to determine whether they match a CCB held by the INIC/CPD. Upon confirming such a match, and assuming no exception conditions exist, the INIC/CPD removes lower layer headers and sends 69 the remaining application data from the frame directly into its final destination in the host using direct memory access (DMA) units of the INIC/CPD. This operation may occur immediately upon receipt of a message packet, for example when a TCP connection already exists and destination buffers have been negotiated, or it may first be necessary to process an initial header to acquire a new set of final destination addresses for this transfer. In this latter case, the INIC/CPD will queue subsequent message packets while waiting for the destination address, and then DMA the queued application data to that destination. The final destination addresses may be provided as a scatter-gather list of host buffer address and length pairs. For a Microsoft type operating system and stack 44, the scatter gather list is a memory descriptor data list (MDL).
[0024] A fast-path candidate that does not match a CCB may be used to set up a new fast-path connection, by sending 65 the frame to the host for sequential protocol processing. In this case, the host uses this frame to create 51 a CCB, which is then passed to the INIC/CPD to control subsequent frames on that connection. The CCB, which is cached 67 in the INIC/CPD, includes control and state information pertinent to all protocols that would have been processed had conventional software layer processing been employed. The CCB also contains storage space for per-transfer information used to facilitate moving application-level data contained within subsequent related message packets directly to a host application in a form available for immediate usage. The INIC/CPD takes command of connection processing upon receiving a CCB for that connection from the host.
[0025] As mentioned above, the present invention improves system performance by offloading TCP/IP data processing from the host protocol stack to the INIC/CPD. Since only the data movement portion of the protocol stack is offloaded, TCP control processing generally remains on the host protocol stack. In addition, the host protocol stack also handles TCP exception processing, such as retransmissions. Leaving TCP control and exception processing on the host protocol stack has the advantage of giving the operating system complete control over the TCP connection. This is convenient because the operating system may choose not to hand out a connection to the network communication device for various reasons. For example, if someone wishes to monitor network frames on the host, the host protocol stack can be programmed to handle all TCP connections, so that no packets are processed on the INIC/CPD. A second advantage to leaving TCP control and exception processing on the host protocol stack is that this greatly simplifies the complexity of operations required by the INIC/CPD, which can be made from an inexpensive application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) as opposed to an expensive CPU.
[0026] In order for a connection to be handled by both the host protocol stack 44 for control and exception conditions, and by the INIC/CPD 30 for data movement, the connection context is made to migrate between the host and the INIC/CPD. A CCB, which contains the set of variables used to represent the state of a given TCP connection, provides the mechanism for this migration. Transfer of a CCB from the host to the INIC/CPD is termed a connection handout, and transfer of a CCB from the INIC/CPD back to the host is termed a connection flush. This transfer may occur several times during the course of a TCP connection as the result of dropped packets or other exceptions, which are discussed below. Once a connection handout occurs, the INIC/CPD handles all TCP processing, according to the fast-path mode. Any message transmissions occurring while in the fast-path mode are referred to as fast-path sends. Likewise, any message receptions that occur while in the fast-path mode are referred to as fast-path receives.
[0027] A portion of the CCB corresponds to a conventional TCP control block, containing items such as sequence numbers and ports, as well as lower protocol values such as IP addresses and the first-hop MAC addresses. A list of variables for such a conventional TCP control block can be found in the book by Gary R. Wright and W. Richard Stevens entitled TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 2 (7thEdition, 1999), which is incorporated by reference herein, on pages 803-805.
[0028] In addition to those TCP variables, a number of variables are provided in the CCB for maintaining state information involving the present invention. A first of these variables, a character termed conn_nbr, denotes the connection number for this CCB. The INIC/CPD 30 may maintain, for example, 256 connections, so that the conn_nbr delineates which of those connections is defined by this CCB. Another CCB-specific variable is termed hosttcbaddr, which lists the address in the host for this particular CCB. This address is used when the CCB is returned from the INIC/CPD to the host. For accelerated processing of the most active connections, the INIC/CPD 30 stores the connections in a hash table in SRAM. A CCB variable termed Hash Value gives a hash table offset for the CCB, which is a hash of the source and destination IP addresses, and source and destination TCP ports for the connection.
[0029] Another character, termed buff_state, tells whether a CCB that has been cached in SRAM matches the corresponding CCB stored in DRAM. After processing of a frame or burst of frames against an SRAM cached connection, the state of the CCB is changed, which is indicated by the buff_state character. When the cached connection is flushed back by DMA to DRAM, replacing the CCB held in DRAM with the SRAM CCB having updated status, the character buff_state is set clean.
[0030] Additional variables contained in a CCB include a character termed rcv_state, which denotes the status of a receive finite state machine for the CCB, and a character termed xmt_state, which denotes the status of a transmit finite state machine for the CCB. Both of these state machines pertain to fast path processing by the INIC/CPD 30. In other words, the state of a fast path receive state machine for a given CCB can be defined by a number of different values indicated by the setting of the rcv_state character, and the state of a fast path transmit state machine for that CCB can be likewise be defined by the setting of the xmt_state character. Events processed against the receive and transmit state machines are denoted in the CCB by characters labeled rcv_evts and xmt_evts, respectively. These event characters offer a history of events that have transpired as well as the current events affecting those state machines. For example, the rcv_evts character may contain eight bits defining previous events and another eight bits defining current events, with the xmt-evts character similarly apportioned.
[0031] Also contained in a CCB are variables associated with frames that have been received by the INIC/CPD 30 corresponding to the connection. For example, fast path received frames may accumulate in the host while the INIC/CPD 30 is waiting for an MDL delineating a host destination for the received message. A CCB field termed RcvQ[RCV_MAX] offers a number of thirty-two-bit words for storing pointers to such frames in DRAM, essentially forming a receive queue. A CCB variable termed OflIO (for overflow input/output pointers), offers information corresponding to the RcvQ, such as pointers to the last frame in and first frame out, while a variable termed QdCnt indicates the number of frames in the RcvQ.
[0032] A number of CCB variables pertain to the MDL that has been provided for storing a received message. A character termed RHHandle is used to report to the host a command that has been completed by the INIC/CPD 30 regarding that MDL. RNxtDAdd is a CCB field that is used to denote the next scatter/gather address list to be acquired from DRAM in the INIC/CPD 30 for storage according to the MDL. The variable RCurBuff describes the current buffer of the MDL for storing data, and RCurLen tells the length of that buffer. Similarly, the variable RNxtBuff tells the next receive buffer from the MDL for storing data, and RNxtLen tells the length of that buffer. RTotLen is used to designate the total length of the MDL, which is reduced as data is stored in the buffers designated by the MDL.
[0033] The CCB similarly keeps track of buffer queues during transmission of a message. The variable XNxtDAdd pertains to the next address in INIC/CPD 30 DRAM from which to acquire a scatter/gather list of data to be sent over a network, while XTotLen provides the total length of the data to be sent, which is reduced as data is sent. The variable XCurBuff describes the current host buffer from which to send data, and XCurLen tells the length of that buffer. Similarly, the variable XNxtBuff tells the next host buffer from which data is acquired, and XNxtLen tells the length of that buffer.
[0034] Some CCB variables pertain to commands sent from the host stack 44 to the INIC/CPD 30 during transmission of a message. Several commands sent by the host regarding a particular CCB may be processed at one time by the INIC/CPD 30, and the CCB maintains variables keeping track of those commands. A variable termed XRspSN holds a TCP sequence number for each message that has been sent over a network. This TCP sequence number is used for matching with an acknowledgement (ACK) from the remote host of receipt of that transmission. A variable termed XHHandle provides a handle or DRAM address of the host regarding a particular command, so that for example upon receiving such an ACK the INIC/CPD can notify the host. CCB variables that keep track of commands being processed by the INIC/CPD include XCmdIn, which tells the next command storage slot, XCmdOut, which describes the command to be executed, and XCmd2Ack, which points to commands that have been sent but not yet ACKed. XCmdCnts lists the number of commands currently being processed and commands that have been sent but not yet ACKed. XmtQ provides a queued list of all the commands being processed by the INIC/CPD.
[0035] The CCB also contains a couple of fields for IP and TCP checksums, termed ip_ckbase and tcp_ckbase, respectively. Fast-path transmission of a message occurs with the INIC/CPD prepending protocol headers derived from the CCB to message data provided by the host for the CCB. The ip_ckbase and tcp_ckbase offer the possibility of adjusting the base checksums provided by the host for prepending to the data along with the headers.
[0036] As mentioned above, fast-path operations can be divided into four categories: handout, flush, send and receive. These fast-path operations may be implemented in the form of a generic Microsoft Task Offload (TCP_TASK_OFFLOAD), which may be independent from the specific hardware of the INIC/CPD 30. For the currently preferred implementation, hardware-specific code is placed in the NDIS miniport driver. Implementations for other protocol processing stacks, such as for Unix, Linux, Novel or Macintosh operating systems, may also be hardware-independent. The present invention illustrates a Microsoft stack implementation since it involves one of the most popular operating systems, and substantial improvements are provided. The description below illustrates the modifications required to integrate the four basic fast-path operations into the Microsoft TCP/IP protocol processing stack. Also defined is the format of the TCP_TASK_OFFLOAD as well as miscellaneous issues associated with these changes.
[0037] Support for the fast-path offload mechanisms requires the definition of a new type of TCP_TASK_OFFLOAD. As with other task offloads, TCP will determine the capabilities of the NDIS miniport by submitting an OID_TCP_TASK_OFFLOAD OID to the driver.
[0038] Fast-path information is passed between the protocol processing stack 44 and the miniport driver 70 as media specific information in an out-of-band data block of a packet descriptor. There are two general fast-path TCP_TASK_OFFLOAD structures—commands and frames. The TCP_OFFLOAD_COMMAND structure contains fast-path information that is being sent from the TCPIP driver to the miniport. The TCP_OFFLOAD_FRAME structure contains fast-path information being sent from the miniport to the TCPIP driver. The header file that defines the fast-path TCP_TASK_OFFLOAD mechanism is described on a later page.
[0039] Six types of offload commands are defined below:
[0040] 1] TCP_OFFLOAD_HANDOUT1 (this is the first phase of a two-phase handshake used in the connection handout);
[0041] 2] TCP_OFFLOAD_HANDOUT2 (this is the second phase of the two-phase handshake used in the connection handout);
[0042] 3] TCP_OFFLOAD_FLUSH (this command is used to flush a connection);
[0043] 4] TCP_OFFLOAD_SENDMDL (this command is used to send fast-path data);
[0044] 5] TCP_OFFLOAD_RCVMDL (this is the command used to pass an MDL scatter gather list to the INIC/CPD for receive data);
[0045] 6] TCP_OFFLOAD_WINUPDATE (this command is used to send a TCP window update to the INIC/CPD); and
[0046] 7] TCP_OFFLOAD_CLOSE (This command is used to close a TCP connection that is on the INIC/CPD).
[0047] Three types of offload frames are defined below:
[0048] 1) TCP_OFFLOAD_FRAME_INTERLOCK (this is part of the two-phase handshake used in the connection handout );
[0049] 2) TCP_OFFLOAD_FLUSH (this is used by the miniport to flush a connection to the host);
[0050] 3) TCP_OFFLOAD_FRAME_DATA (this is used to indicate newly arrived fast-path data).
[0051] FIG. 4 illustrates the migration of a connection context during a handout from the host protocol processing stack 44 to the INIC/CPD 30 via a miniport driver 70 installed in the host 20. Two of the TCP offload commands and one of the TCP offload frames that were defined above are illustrated here. The miniport driver 70 converts these commands into hardware specific interactions with the INIC/CPD 30.
[0052] The connection handout is implemented as a two-phase operation to prevent race conditions. If instead a handout were attempted in a single-phase operation, there could be a period of time during which the protocol processing stack 44 had issued the handout but the INIC/CPD 30 had not yet received the handout. During this time, slow-path input data frames could arrive and be processed by the protocol processing stack 44. Should this happen, the context information, which the protocol processing stack 44 passed to the INIC/CPD 30, would no longer be valid. This potential error is avoided by establishing a provisional context on the INIC/CPD 30 with the first handout command.
[0053] Thus a handout of a CCB from the stack 44 to the INIC/CPD 30 for a connection to be processed by the fast-path occurs in several steps. First, a TCP_OFFLOAD_HANDOUT1 100 is sent from the stack 44 to the miniport driver 70, which issues a Handout1 command 102 to the INIC/CPD 30. The INIC/CPD 30 sends an interlock frame 105 to the miniport driver 70 upon receipt of the handout1 command 102, and internally queues any subsequent frames for the specified connection. Upon receipt of the interlock frame 105, the miniport driver 70 sends a TCP_OFFLOAD_FRAME_INTERLOCK frame 108 to the stack 44, which interprets frame 108 as a signal that no further slow-path frames are expected. Stack 44 thereupon completes the handshake by issuing a TCP_OFFLOAD_HANDOUT2 command 110 that includes a CCB, which is forwarded by the miniport driver 70 to the INIC/CPD 30 as a handout2 112. Upon receipt of the handout2 112, the INIC/CPD 30 reads the contents of the CCB and begins fast-path processing. Note that the CCB address is passed to the miniport in the TCP_OFFLOAD_HANDOUT2 command.
[0054] Once a connection has been placed in fast-path mode by the CCB handout, subsequent fast-path commands will require a way to identify the particular connection. The present invention defines two opaque handles for this purpose. A HostContext handle is a value used to uniquely identify a connection to the protocol processing stack 44. For TCP/IP messages the value is the address of the TCP control block. This handle is opaque to the miniport driver 70. A LowerContext handle, on the other hand, is used to uniquely identify the connection to the miniport driver 70 and/or INIC/CPD 30. This handle is opaque to the host stack 44, and implementation specific to the miniport driver 70. Both the HostContext handle and LowerContext handle are contained in the TCP_OFFLOAD_COMMAND structure, while only the HostContext value is contained in the TCP_OFFLOAD_FRAME structure. During a connection handout, the host stack 44 passes down the HostContext field to the miniport driver 70. The miniport driver 70 returns the LowerContext on completing the handout request.
[0055] The protocol processing stack 44 on the host has responsibility for deciding when a connection is to be handed out to the INIC/CPD 30. A connection can be handed out to the INIC/CPD 30 as soon as the connection is fully established and any outstanding exceptions have been handled. Nevertheless, the protocol processing stack 44 may choose to not hand out a connection for a variety of reasons. For example, in order to preserve resources on the INIC/CPD 30, the host stack 44 may choose to not handout out slow connections, such as those employing Telnet. The host stack 44 may also use an heuristic method to determine that a particular connection is too unreliable to warrant putting it in fast-path mode.
[0056] Either the host protocol processing stack 44 or the INIC/CPD 30 can flush a connection, as shown in FIG. 5. Should the host stack 44 decide to flush a connection, it will issue a TCP_OFFLOAD_FLUSH 120 to the miniport driver 70, which in turn issues a Flush command 122 to the INIC/CPD 30, causing the INIC/CPD 30 to flush the connection. When the INIC/CPD 30 flushes the connection to the stack 44, several operations are performed that result in sending a Flush frame 125 to the miniport driver 70, which in turn sends a TCP_OFFLOAD_FRAME_FLUSH 128 to the INIC/CPD 30. For the situation in which the INIC/CPD 30 decides to flush the connection, the signals 120 and 122 do not exist.
[0057] When the INIC/CPD 30 flushes a connection, either by request from the host stack 44 or by its own decision, it performs several procedures. First, any outstanding fast-path send or receive message transfers are completed. When operating in the fast-path mode, a send or receive message transfer may involve 64 kilobytes of data, for example. When a send or receive transfer is terminated, information regarding the data sent or received is flushed to the host so that the stack 44 can continue processing the send or receive operation. In order to do this, the scatter gather list defining the set of host buffer address and length pairs for the send or receive message transfer is passed back to the stack 44, along with information denoting how much data has already been transferred via the fast-path. Second, the contents of the CCB defining the fast-path connection are also sent from the INIC/CPD 30 back to the host. Note that while a connection is in the fast-path mode, the state of the connection is maintained by the INIC/CPD 30. This connection state is transferred back to the host so that sequence numbers, etc, are kept in sync. The INIC/CPD 30 does not issue the flush frame to the host stack 44 until both of these steps are complete.
[0058] A connection may be flushed for a variety of reasons. For example, the stack 44 will flush if it receives a TDI_DISCONNECT instruction for the connection, as connection setup and breakdown occurs on the host stack. The INIC/CPD 30 will flush if it encounters a condition that is not allocated to the INIC/CPD for handling, such as expiration of a retransmission timer or receipt of a fragmented TCP segment.
[0059] FIG. 6 diagrams a control mechanism for transmitting a message via the fast-path, which may be initiated by the protocol processing stack 44 receiving a TDI_SEND request for a connection that is in the fast-path mode. The steps for controlling this fast-path send of the message to a remote host via the INIC/CPD 30 are simple. The stack 44 creates a TCP_OFFLOAD_COMMAND with the appropriate context handles, the length of the message to be sent, and a scatter-gather list or send MDL. A virtual to physical address translation is performed by the host stack 44, although this translation may alternatively be performed by the miniport driver 70. The fast-path send command will not complete until either all of the data has been sent and acknowledged, or the connection has been flushed back to the host. If the connection is flushed back to the host, a residual field will indicate how much of the send MDL remains to be sent.
[0060] A fast-path receive operation begins when a frame arrives on the INIC/CPD 30 for a connection on which no outstanding receive operation is already in progress. As shown in FIG. 7, when such a frame is received by the INIC/CPD 30, some or all of the received frame (depending on the frame size) is forwarded 140 to the miniport driver 70, which in turn sends 142 a TCP_OFFLOAD_FRAME_DATA frame containing the forwarded information to the host stack 44. The host stack 44 will in turn communicate with the upper layer interface, which may be a TDI interface for Microsoft systems, calling a receive handler registered by the upper layer or application. The amount of data in the received message frame may be indicated to that host application at this point, which may be termed an indicated length. That frame may also indicate the size of the data for the entire received message, so that a destination for that data can be earmarked within the host, such as with a scatter-gather list. A total message length that may be specified in an initial frame header is termed an available length.
[0061] For example, a NETBIOS message denotes the size of the data in the NETBIOS header, which can optionally be processed by the INIC/CPD 30 and passed to the upper layer interface for earmarking a final host destination in which to place the message data. Alternatively, the host stack 44 can process an initial NETBIOS header and learn how much more data is expected for the NETBIOS request. In cases for which a total message is size is unknown, a fictitious indication of large message length can be communicated to the upper layer interface, causing the application to respond with a large set of destination addresses which should have sufficient storage for the message.
[0062] Continuing with the example of a Microsoft operating system, if the available length is larger than the indicated length, the TDI upper layer or application will provide an I/O request packet (IRP) with an MDL. This MDL is passed down to the miniport driver 70 in the form of a TCP_OFFLOAD_RCVMDL command, which forwards the command to the INIC/CPD 30. Like the fast-path send command, this command contains the context handles, the length of the receive MDL, and the scatter-gather list contained in the MDL. By passing the MDL directly to the INIC/CPD 30, the message data is moved directly to the buffer(s) provided by the TDI upper layer or application, without the data being touched by the CPU.
[0063] Subsequent message frames for this connection will be processed solely by the INIC/CPD 30 and moved into the buffers denoted by the MDL until either the MDL is filled or the command is flushed back to the host. If the command is flushed back to the host stack 44, then the residual field will indicate how much unprocessed data remains for the MDL. If the TCP_OFFLOAD_RCVMDL command is completed without error, then the Tcpip driver will complete the IRP, at which point the system is ready for the next TCP_OFFLOAD_FRAME_DATA indication. For messages whose total size is not discernable from initial received frames, the connection may receive a FIN before the receive MDL is filled. If this occurs a short completion is performed on the receive IRP.
[0064] If the INIC/CPD 30 has been given a host destination such as a scatter-gather list or MDL by an upper layer or application, the INIC/CPD will treat data placed in this destination as being accepted by the upper layer or application. The INIC/CPD 30 may therefore ACK incoming data as it is filling the destination buffer(s) and will keep its advertised receive window fully open.
[0065] For small requests, however, there may be no MDL returned by the upper layer interface such as TDI to the INIC/CPD 30. In this case all of the data may be absorbed directly in the receive callback function. To account for this, the data which has been accepted by the application is updated to the INIC/CPD 30 so that the INIC/CPD can update its receive window. In order to do this, the host stack 44 can accumulate a count of data which has been accepted by the application receive callback function for a connection. From the INIC/CPD's point of view, though, segments sent to the host destination seem to be just “thrown over the wall” unless there is an explicit reply path. To correct this deficiency, the update may be piggybacked on requests sent to the INIC/CPD 30, for example via a field in the TCP_OFFLOAD_COMMAND structure. To deal with a scenario in which the data stream is entirely one-way, we can also define a TCP_OFFLOAD_WINUPDATE command type to update the INIC/CPD.
[0066] A converse issue with offloading TCP processing involves keeping host stack 44 TCP/IP statistics up to date. For example, there is no conventional way for the host stack 44 to know how many TCP segments were received by the INIC/CPD 30. We address this issue by introducing a GET_TCP_STATISTICS OID, which is passed to the miniport driver 70 to obtain the TCP statistics. The way that the miniport and INIC/CPD 30 maintain these statistics depends upon implementations selected for those systems.
[0067] The host stack 44 creates and maintains a performance monitor (Perfmon) extension dynamic link library (DLL), which can be used to monitor fast-path statistics such as the following: 1) Fast-path/slow-path send/receive bytes per second; 2) Fast-path/slow-path send/receive segments per second; 3) Handouts per second; 4) Flushes per second; and 5) Fast-path/slow-path current connections.
[0068] Approximately 2500 lines of code are employed to port the fast-path modifications to the Microsoft host stack 44, not including comments. The approximate breakdown of this is as follows: 1) Connection handout—550 lines of code; 2) Flush—400 lines of code; 3) Send—550 lines of code; 4) Receive—600 lines of code; and 5) Miscellaneous (e.g., stats. and perfmon)—250 lines of code.
[0069] The fast-path code is implemented in such a way that it requires minimal changes to the existing TCP/IP host stack 44. Nearly all of the approximately 2500 lines of code are contained within fast-path specific routines, which are in turn kept in a single fast-path specific file. A number of changes to a Microsoft host stack 44 operation provide the appropriate calls into the fast-path code. These changes are summarized below.
[0070] The initialization code queries the adapters for the fast-path TCP_TASK_OFFLOAD feature and sets the appropriate information in the structure representing the adapter. Modifications to the TDI data presentation code are employed to indicate data received. Modifications are also employed where the host stack 44 receives a TDI Send request. The modified stack 44 then recognizes that a connection is in fast-path mode and calls the fast-path send routine.
[0071] After a TCP connection is set up, the host stack 44 checks the capabilities of the adapter associated with the connection, and if appropriate calls the fast-path connection handout routine. Similarly, for a fast-path connection that has been placed into slow-path mode, the host stack code repeats the handout of the connection once the connection returns to a standard state.
[0072] The ProtocolReceivePacket routine of the host stack 44 is modified to identify the existence of fast-path TCP_TASK_OFFLOAD information in the packet. If fast-path information exists, the appropriate fast-path receive routine is called.
[0073] The ProtocolSendComplete routine of the host stack 44 recognizes the completion of a fast-path send, and calls the appropriate fast-path send completion routine.
[0074] The TCP input code recognizes when it has received a slow-path frame on a fast-path connection, which indicates a routing loop. If this occurs the host stack 44 implements the flush code.
[0075] The TCP connection breakdown code recognizes when a connection is in fast path mode and issues a flush before closing the connection.
[0076] Paper Appendix A provides source code, written in a C-type language, defining the TCP_TASK_OFFLOAD structures used to implement the fast-path task offload.
[0077] CD Appendix A contains a hardware description language (verilog code) description of an embodiment of a receive sequencer of a network interface device.
[0078] CD Appendix B contains microcode executable by a processor on the network interface device. The processor operates in conjunction with the receive sequencer of CD Appendix A.
[0079] CD Appendix C contains a device driver executable on the host as well as an ATCP stack executable on the host. The software of CD Appendix C operates in conjunction with the network interface device of CD Appendices A and B.
[0080] Although we have focused in this document and the accompanying drawings on teaching the preferred embodiment, other embodiments and modifications will become apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art in view of this teaching. Therefore, this invention is to be limited only by the following claims, which include all such embodiments and modifications when viewed in conjunction with the specification and accompanying drawings.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A set of instructions executable on a processor, the set of instructions being for performing steps comprising:
establishing a TCP connection, the TCP connection being at least in part identified by a TCP source port, TCP destination port, IP source address, and IP destination address; and
offloading the TCP connection from the processor to an intelligent TCP offload mechanism.
2. The set of instructions of claim 1, wherein the TCP offload mechanism is a network interface card (NIC), and wherein the set of executable instructions are part of an operating system program executing on a host computer, the processor being a central processing unit (CPU) of the host computer.
3. The set of instructions of claim 1, wherein the set of instructions includes a protocol processing stack.
4. The set of instructions of claim 1, wherein the offloading includes transferring control of the TCP connection from the processor to the TCP offload mechanism.
5. The set of instructions of claim 1, wherein the offloading includes communicating a status of the TCP connection from the processor to the TCP offload mechanism.
6. The set of instructions of claim 1, wherein the offloading includes fast-path processing of the TCP connection.
7. The set of instructions of claim 1, wherein the offloading includes data path processing of the TCP connection.
8. The set of instructions of claim 1, wherein a message is communicated via the TCP connection, and wherein the offloading involves protocol processing of the message.
9. The set of instructions of claim 1, wherein a message is communicated via the TCP connection, and wherein the offloading involves fast-path processing of the message.
10. The set of instructions of claim 1, wherein a message is communicated via the TCP connection, and wherein the offloading involves data path processing of the message.
11. The set of instructions of claim 1, wherein the processor is a processor of a host, and wherein the TCP offload mechanism is a communication processing device (CPD), the CPD being integrated into the host.
12. The set of instructions of claim 1, wherein the offloading involves a first phase and a second phase, wherein the first phase involves causing the TCP offload mechanism to queue subsequent incoming frames for the TCP connection while the processor is in control of the TCP connection, the subsequent incoming frames not being passed to the processor during the first phase, and wherein the second phase involves passing control of the TCP connection from the processor to the TCP offload mechanism.
13. A set of instructions executable on a host computer, the set of instructions being for performing steps comprising:
sending a first communication from the host computer to a TCP offload device, the first communication causing the TCP offload device to store subsequently received frames for a TCP connection, the subsequently received frames being received onto the TCP offload device from a network;
receiving a second communication from the TCP offload device by the host computer; and
in response to the receiving of the second communication sending a third communication from the host computer to the TCP offload device, the third communication causing control of the TCP connection to be passed from the host computer to the TCP offload device.
14. The set of instructions of claim 13, wherein the set of instructions comprises a driver and a stack of protocol processing layers, and wherein the TCP offload device is a network interface card (NIC).
15. The set of instructions of claim 13, wherein the sending of the third communication includes sending a memory descriptor list (MDL) from the host computer to the TCP offload device, the MDL identifying a destination in a memory on the host computer.
16. A set of instructions executable on a host computer for performing steps comprising:
determining whether a TCP offload device coupled to the host computer has fast-path capabilities;
obtaining from an application program an indication of a destination on the host computer, the destination being a place in a memory on the host computer where data of a TCP connection is to be placed;
passing control of the TCP connection to the TCP offload device; and
receiving statistics information from the TCP offload device, the statistics information being statistics information on the TCP connection.
17. The set of instructions of claim 16, wherein the statistics information includes a number of segments received by the TCP offload device.
18. The set of instructions of claim 16, wherein the set of instructions is also for performing the further steps of:
receiving control of the TCP connection back from the TCP offload device; and
receiving a communication from the TCP offload device, the communication containing a residual field, the residual field indicating an amount of the data of the TCP connection that remains to be placed in the destination on the host computer.
19. The set of instructions of claim 16, wherein the control of the TCP connection is passed to the TCP offload device in a plural-phase handout process, a first phase of the handout process including causing the TCP offload device to queue subsequent message packets received onto the TCP offload device for the TCP connection such that the subsequent message packets do not pass to the host computer during the first phase, a second phase of the handout process including passing the indication of the destination to the TCP offload device.
20. The set of instructions of claim 16, wherein the indication of the destination is a memory descriptor list (MDL).
21. An operating system that passes control of a TCP connection from a host computer to a TCP offload device coupled to the host computer, wherein after said control of the TCP connection is passed to the TCP offload device the TCP offload device performs all or substantially all TCP protocol processing on network frames received onto the TCP offload device for the TCP connection such that the operating system and the host computer perform no or substantially no TCP protocol processing on the network frames after said control is passed.
22. The operating system of claim 21, wherein the operating system performed some TCP protocol processing on the TCP connection prior to said control being passed to the TCP offload device.
23. The operating system of claim 21, wherein the operating system established the TCP connection prior to said control being passed to the TCP offload device.
Patent Citations (91)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4366538(A) | 1982-12-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US4991133(A) | 1991-02-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US5056058(A) | 1991-10-01 | Hirata et al. | Applicant |
| US5058110(A) | 1991-10-01 | Beach et al. | Applicant |
| US5097442(A) | 1992-03-01 | Ward et al. | Applicant |
| US5163131(A) | 1992-11-01 | Row et al. | Applicant |
| US5212778(A) | 1993-05-01 | Dally et al. | Applicant |
| US5280477(A) | 1994-01-01 | Trapp | Applicant |
| US5289580(A) | 1994-02-01 | Latif et al. | Applicant |
| US5303344(A) | 1994-04-01 | Yokoyama et al. | Applicant |
| US5412782(A) | 1995-05-01 | Hausman et al. | Applicant |
| US5448566(A) | 1995-09-01 | Richter et al. | Applicant |
| US5485579(A) | 1996-01-01 | Hitz et al. | Applicant |
| US5506966(A) | 1996-04-01 | Ban | Applicant |
| US5511169(A) | 1996-04-01 | Suda | Applicant |
| US5548730(A) | 1996-08-01 | Young et al. | Applicant |
| US5566170(A) | 1996-10-01 | Bakke et al. | Applicant |
| US5588121(A) | 1996-12-01 | Reddin et al. | Applicant |
| US5590328(A) | 1996-12-01 | Seno et al. | Applicant |
| US5592622(A) | 1997-01-01 | Isfeld et al. | Applicant |
| US5629933(A) | 1997-05-01 | Delp et al. | Applicant |
| US5634099(A) | 1997-05-01 | Andrews et al. | Applicant |
| US5634127(A) | 1997-05-01 | Cloud et al. | Applicant |
| US5642482(A) | 1997-06-01 | Pardillos | Applicant |
| US5664114(A) | 1997-09-01 | Krech, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5671355(A) | 1997-09-01 | Collins | Applicant |
| US5678060(A) | 1997-10-01 | Yokoyama et al. | Applicant |
| US5692130(A) | 1997-11-01 | Shobu et al. | Applicant |
| US5699317(A) | 1997-12-01 | Sartore et al. | Applicant |
| US5701434(A) | 1997-12-01 | Nakagawa | Applicant |
| US5701516(A) | 1997-12-01 | Cheng et al. | Applicant |
| US5749095(A) | 1998-05-01 | Hagersten | Applicant |
| US5751715(A) | 1998-05-01 | Chan et al. | Applicant |
| US5752078(A) | 1998-05-01 | Delp et al. | Applicant |
| US5758084(A) | 1998-05-01 | Silverstein et al. | Applicant |
| US5758089(A) | 1998-05-01 | Gentry et al. | Applicant |
| US5758186(A) | 1998-05-01 | Hamilton et al. | Applicant |
| US5758194(A) | 1998-05-01 | Kuzma | Applicant |
| US5771349(A) | 1998-06-01 | Picazo, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5790804(A) | 1998-08-01 | Osborne | Applicant |
| US5794061(A) | 1998-08-01 | Hansen et al. | Applicant |
| US5802580(A) | 1998-09-01 | McAlpine | Applicant |
| US5809328(A) | 1998-09-01 | Nogales et al. | Applicant |
| US5812775(A) | 1998-09-01 | Van Seeters et al. | Applicant |
| US5815646(A) | 1998-09-01 | Purcell et al. | Applicant |
| US5878225(A) | 1999-03-01 | Bilansky et al. | Applicant |
| US5913028(A) | 1999-06-01 | Wang et al. | Applicant |
| US5930830(A) | 1999-07-01 | Mendelson et al. | Applicant |
| US5931918(A) | 1999-08-01 | Row et al. | Applicant |
| US5935205(A) | 1999-08-01 | Murayama et al. | Applicant |
| US5937169(A) | 1999-08-01 | Connery et al. | Applicant |
| US5941969(A) | 1999-08-01 | Ram et al. | Applicant |
| US5941972(A) | 1999-08-01 | Hoese et al. | Applicant |
| US5950203(A) | 1999-09-01 | Stakuis et al. | Applicant |
| US5991299(A) | 1999-11-01 | Radogna et al. | Applicant |
| US5996024(A) | 1999-11-01 | Blumenau | Applicant |
| US6005849(A) | 1999-12-01 | Roach et al. | Applicant |
| US6009478(A) | 1999-12-01 | Panner et al. | Applicant |
| US6016513(A) | 2000-01-01 | Lowe | Applicant |
| US6021446(A) | 2000-02-01 | Gentry, Jr. | Applicant |
| US6026452(A) | 2000-02-01 | Pitts | Applicant |
| US6034963(A) | 2000-03-01 | Minami et al. | Applicant |
| US6044438(A) | 2000-03-01 | Olnowich | Applicant |
| US6047356(A) | 2000-04-01 | Anderson et al. | Applicant |
| US6057863(A) | 2000-05-01 | Olarig | Applicant |
| US6061368(A) | 2000-05-01 | Hitzelberger | Applicant |
| US6065096(A) | 2000-05-01 | Day et al. | Applicant |
| US6141705(A) | 2000-10-01 | Anand et al. | Applicant |
| US6173333(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Jolitz et al. | Applicant |
| US6226680(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Boucher et al. | Applicant |
| US6246683(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Connery et al. | Applicant |
| US6247060(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Boucher et al. | Applicant |
| US6345301(B1) | 2002-02-01 | Burns et al. | Applicant |
| US6356951(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Gentry, Jr. | Applicant |
| US6389468(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Muller et al. | Applicant |
| US6427169(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Elzur | Applicant |
| US6434651(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Gentry, Jr. | Applicant |
| US6449656(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Elzur et al. | Applicant |
| US6453360(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Muller et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0004354(A1) | 2001-06-01 | Jolitz | Applicant |
| US2001/0025315(A1) | 2001-09-01 | Jolitz | Applicant |
| WO/98/19412 | 1998-05-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/98/50852 | 1998-11-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/99/04343 | 1999-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO99/65219 | 1999-12-01 | Applicant | |
| WO/13091 | 2000-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/04770 | 2001-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/05107 | 2001-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/05116 | 2001-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/05123 | 2001-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/40960 | 2001-06-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (52)
- Form 10-K for Exelan, Inc., for the fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 1987 (10 pages).Applicant
- Form 10-K for Exelan, Inc., for the fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 1988 (10 pages).Applicant
- Article from Rice University entitled “LRP: A New Network Subsystem Architecture for Server Systems”, by Peter Druschel and Gaurav Banga, Rice University, Oct. 1996, 8 pages.Applicant
- Internet RFC/STD/FYI/BCP Archives article with heading “RFC2140” entitled “TCP Control Block Interdependence”, web address http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2140.html, 9 pages, printed Sep. 20, 2002.Applicant
- Internet pages entitled “Hardware Assisted Protocol Processing”, (which Eugene Feinber is working on), 1 page, printed Nov. 25, 1998.Applicant
- Zilog product Brief entitled “Z85C30 CMOS SCC Serial Communication Controller”, Zilog Inc., 3 pages, 1997.Applicant
- Internet pages of Xpoint Technologies www.xpoint.com website, 5 pages, printed Dec. 19, 1997.Applicant
- Internet pages entitled: Asante and 100BASE-T Fast Ethernet. 7 pages, printed May 27, 1997.Applicant
- Internet pages entitled: A Guide to the Paragon XP/S-A7 Supercomputer at Indiana University. 13 pages, printed Dec. 21, 1998.Applicant
- Richard Stevens, “TCP/IP Illustrated, vol. 1, The Protocols”, pp. 325-326 (1994).Applicant
- Internet pages entitled: Northridge/Southbridge vs. Intel Hub Architecture, 4 pages, printed Feb. 19, 2001.Applicant
- Gigabit Ethernet Technical Brief, Achieving End-to-End Performance. Alteon Networks, Inc., First Edition, Sep. 1996.Applicant
- Internet pages directed to Technical Brief on Alteon Ethernet Gigabit NIC technology, www.alteon.com, 14 pages, printed Mar. 15, 1997.Applicant
- VIA Technologies, Inc. article entitled “VT8501 Apollo MVP4”, pages i-iv, 1-11, cover and copyright page, revision 1.3, Feb. 1, 2000.Applicant
- iReady News Archives article entitled “iReady Rounding Out Management Team with Two Key Executives”, http://www.ireadyco.com/archives/keyexec.html, 2 pages, printed Nov. 28, 1998.Applicant
- “Toshiba Delivers First Chips to Make Consumer Devices Internet-Ready Based on iReady's Design, ” Press Release Oct., 1998, 3 pages, printed Nov. 28, 1998.Applicant
- Internet pages from iReady Products, web sitehttp://www.ireadyco.com/products,html, 2 pages, downloaded Nov. 25, 1998.Applicant
- iReady News Archives, Toshiba, iReady shipping Internet chip, 1 page, printed Nov. 25, 1998.Applicant
- Interprophet article entitled “Technology”, http://www.interprophet.com/technology.html, 17 pages, printed Mar. 01, 2000.Applicant
- iReady Corporation, article entitled “The I-1000 Internet Tuner”, 2 pages, date unknown.Applicant
- iReady article entitled “About Us Introduction”, Internet pages fromhttp://www.iReadyco.com/about.html, 3 pages, printed Nov. 25, 1998.Applicant
- iReady News Archive article entitled “Revolutionary Approach to Consumer Electronics Internet Connectivity Funded”, San Jose, CA, Nov. 20, 1997. 2 pages, printed Nov. 02, 1998.Applicant
- iReady News Archive article entitled “Seiko Instruments Inc. (SII) Introduces World's first Internet-Ready Intelligent LCD Modules Based On iReady Technology,” Santa Clara, CA and Chiba, Japan, Oct. 26, 1998. 2 pages, printed Nov. 02, 1998.Applicant
- NEWSwatch article entitled “iReady internet Tuner to Web Enable Devices”, Tuesday, Nov. 05, 1996, printed Nov. 02, 1998.Applicant
- EETimes article entitled “Tuner for Toshiba, Toshiba Taps iReady for Internet Tuner”, by David Lammers, 2 pages, printed Nov. 02, 1998.Applicant
- “Comparison of Novell Netware and TCP/IP Protocol Architectures”, by J.S. Carbone, 19 pages, printed Apr. 10, 1998.Applicant
- Adaptec article entitled “AEA-7110C-a DuraSAN product”, 11 pages, printed Oct. 01, 2001.Applicant
- iSCSI HBA article entitled “iSCSI and 2Gigabit fibre Channel Host Bus Adapters from Emulex, QLogic, Adaptec, JNI”, 8 pages, printed Oct. 01, 2001.Applicant
- U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/053,240, Jolitz et al. filed Jul. 18, 1997.Applicant
- iSCSI HBA article entitled “FCE-3210/6410 32 and 64-bit PCI-to-Fibre Channel HBA”, 6 pages, printed Oct. 01, 2001.Applicant
- iSCSI HBA article entitled “iSCSI Storage”, 6 pages, printed Oct. 01, 2001.Applicant
- “Two-Way TCP Traffic Over Rate Controlled Channels: Effects and Analysis”, by Kalampoukas et al., IEEE Transactions on Networking, vol. 6, No. 6, Dec. 1998.Applicant
- IReady News article entitled “Toshiba Delivers First Chips to Make Consumer Devices Internet-Ready Based on iReady Design”, Santa Clara, CA, and Tokyo, Japan, Oct. 14, 1998, printed Nov. 02, 1998.Applicant
- U.S. patent application No. 08/964,304, by Napolitano, et al., entitled “File Array Storage Architecture”, filed Nov. 04, 1997.Applicant
- “File System Design For An NFS File Server Appliance”, Article by D. Hitz, et al., 13 pages.Applicant
- Adaptec Press Release article entitled “Adaptec Announces EtherStorage Technology”, 2 pages, May 04, 2000, printed Jun. 14, 2000.Applicant
- Adaptec article entitled “EtherStorage Frequently Asked Questions”, 5 pages, printed Jul. 19, 2000.Applicant
- Adaptec article entitled “EtherStorage White Paper”, 7 pages, printed Jul. 19, 2000.Applicant
- CIBC World Markets article entitled “Computers; Storage”, by J. Berlino et al., 9 pages, dated Aug. 07, 2000.Applicant
- Merrill Lynch article entitled “Storage Futures”, by S. Milunovich, 22 pages, dated May. 10, 2000.Applicant
- CBS Market Watch article entitled Montreal Start-Up Battles Data Storage Bottleneck, by S. Taylor, dated Mar. 05, 2000, 2 pages, printed Mar. 07, 2000.Applicant
- Internet-draft article entitled “SCSI/TCP (SCSI over TCP)”, by J. Satran et al., 38 pages, dated Feb. 2000, printed May 19, 2000.Applicant
- Internet pages entitled Technical White Paper-Xpoint's Disk to LAN Acceleration Solution for Windows NT Server, printed Jun. 05, 1997.Applicant
- Jato Technologies article entitled Network Accelerator Chip Architecture, twelve-slide presentation, printed Aug. 19, 1998.Applicant
- EETimes article entitled Enterprise System Uses Flexible Spec, dated Aug. 10, 1998, printed Nov. 25, 1998.Applicant
- Internet pages entitled “Smart Ethernet Network Interface Cards”, which Berend Ozceri is developing, printed Nov. 25, 1998.Applicant
- Internet pages entitled “Hardware Assisted Protocol Processing”, which Eugene Feinberg is working on, printed Nov. 25, 1998.Applicant
- Internet pages of Xaqti corporation entitled “GigaPower Protocol Processor Product Review,” printed Nov. 25, 1999.Applicant
- Internet pages entitled “DART: Fast Application Level Networking via Data-Copy Avoidance,” by Robert J. Walsh, printed Jun. 03, 1999.Applicant
- Internet pages of InterProphet entitled “Frequently Asked Questions”, by Lynne Jolitz, printed Jun. 14, 2000.Applicant
- Internet pages entitled iReady About Us and iReady Products, printed Nov. 25, 1998.Applicant
- Andrew S. Tanenbaum, Computer Networks, Third Edition, 1996, ISBN 0-13-349945-6.Applicant