US 6,654,697 B1Grant

Flow measurement with diagnostics

Issue Date:2003-11-25

•68 Claims

•16 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

A fluid flow meter diagnosing the condition of its primary element or impulse lines connecting to a differential pressure sensor. A difference circuit coupled to the differential pressure sensor has a difference output representing the sensed differential pressure minus a moving average. A calculate circuit receives the difference output and calculates a trained output of historical data obtained during an initial training time. The calculate circuit also calculates a monitor output of current data obtained during monitoring or normal operation of the fluid flow meter. A diagnostic circuit receives the trained output and the monitor put and generates a diagnostic output indicating a current condition of the primary element and impulse lines.

Metadata

Assignee

Rosemount Inc.

Inventors

Evren Eryurek
Kadir Kavaklioglu

Application Information

Application Number:US 09/383,828

Filing Date:1999-08-27

Priority Date:1996-03-28

Art Unit:7

Classifications

IPC:

G06F 1900G01F 134

Field of Search:

702 45702 47702 5070210070218370218273 11673 12573 12673 13573 157738613567386142

Patent Drawings (16 sheets)

Description

[0002] This is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/257,896, filed Feb. 25, 1999 which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/623,569, filed Mar. 28, 1996.

Background of the Invention

[0003] Fluid flow meters are used in industrial process control environments to measure fluid flow and provide flow signals for flow indicators and controllers. Inferential flow meters measure fluid flow in a pipe by measuring a pressure drop near a discontinuity within the pipe. The discontinuity (primary element) can be an orifice, a nozzle, a venturi, a pitot tube, a vortex shedding bar, a target or even a simple bend in the pipe. Flow around the discontinuity causes both a pressure drop and increased turbulence. The pressure drop is sensed by a pressure transmitter (secondary element) placed outside the pipe and connected by impulse lines or impulse passageways to the fluid in the pipe. Reliability depends on maintaining a correct calibration. Erosion or buildup of solids on the primary element can change the calibration. Impulse lines can become plugged over time, which also adversely affects calibration.

[0004] Disassembly and inspection of the impulse lines is one method used to detect and correct plugging of lines. Another known method for detecting plugging is to periodically add a “check pulse” to the measurement signal from a pressure transmitter. This check pulse causes a control system connected to the transmitter to disturb the flow. If the pressure transmitter fails to accurately sense the flow disturbance, an alarm signal is generated indicating line plugging. Another known method for detecting plugging is sensing of both static and differential pressures. If there is inadequate correlation between oscillations in the static and differential pressures, then an alarm signal is generated indicating line plugging. Still another known method for detecting line plugging is to sense static pressures and pass them through high pass and low pass filters. Noise signals obtained from the filters are compared to a threshold, and if variance in the noise is less than the threshold, then an alarm signal indicates that the line is blocked.

[0005] These known methods rely on providing static pressure sensors or disassembly of the flow meter or use of an external control system for diagnostics, increasing complexity and reducing reliability. These known methods do not provide for diagnosing the condition of the primary element. There is thus a need for a better diagnostic technology providing more predictive, less reactive maintenance for reducing cost or improving reliability.

Summary of the Invention

[0006] A fluid flow meter diagnoses the condition of its primary element or impulse lines. The primary element and the impulse lines together form a differential pressure generator. This differential pressure generator generates a differential pressure that represents the flow rate. The differential pressure is coupled to a differential pressure sensor in the fluid flow meter.

[0007] A difference circuit coupled to the differential pressure sensor generates a difference output representing the sensed differential pressure minus a moving average of the sensed differential pressure.

[0008] A calculate circuit receives the difference output and calculates a trained output of historical data obtained during an initial training time. The calculate circuit also calculates a monitor output of current data obtained during monitoring or normal operation of the fluid flow meter.

[0009] A diagnostic circuit receives the trained output and the monitor output and generates a diagnostic output indicating a current condition of the pressure generator relative to an historical condition.

[0010] A flow circuit is also coupled to the sensor and generates an output indicating the flow rate.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0011] FIG. 1 is an illustration of a typical fluid processing environment for the diagnostic flow meter.

[0012] FIG. 2 is a pictorial illustration of an embodiment of a transmitter used in a fluid flow meter that diagnoses the condition of its impulse lines and/or primary element.

[0013] FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a fluid flow meter that diagnoses a condition of its pressure generator.

[0014] FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a fluid flow meter that diagnoses the condition of its impulse lines.

[0015] FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a fluid flow meter that diagnoses the condition of its primary element.

[0016] FIG. 6 is a flow chart of a process diagnosing the condition of impulse lines.

[0017] FIG. 7 illustrates a diagnostic fluid flow meter that has a pitot tube for a primary element.

[0018] FIG. 8 illustrates a diagnostic fluid flow meter that has an in-line pitot tube for a primary element.

[0019] FIG. 9 illustrates a diagnostic fluid flow meter that has an integral orifice plate for a primary element.

[0020] FIG. 10 illustrates a diagnostic fluid flow meter than has an orifice plate clamped between pipe flanges for a primary element.

[0021] FIG. 11 illustrates a diagnostic fluid flow meter that has a venturi for a primary element.

[0022] FIG. 12 illustrates a diagnostic fluid flow meter that has a nozzle for a primary element.

[0023] FIG. 13 illustrates a diagnostic fluid flow meter that has an orifice plate for a primary element.

[0024] FIG. 14 is a flow chart of a process of diagnosing the condition of a primary element.

[0025] FIG. 15 is a flow chart of a process of diagnosing the condition of both impulse lines and a primary element.

[0026] FIG. 16 is an illustration of a transmitter with remote seals and diagnostics.

[0027] FIG. 17 is a schematic illustration of a transmitter with diagnostic features connected to a tank to measure a time integral of flow in and out of the tank.

[0028] FIG. 18 is a graph of amplitude versus frequency versus time of a process variable signal.

[0029] FIG. 19 is a block diagram of a discrete wavelet transformation.

[0030] FIG. 20 is a graph showing signals output from a discrete wavelet transformation.

[0031] FIG. 21 is a diagram showing a simplified neural network.

[0032] FIG. 22A is a diagram showing a neural network used to provide a residual lifetime estimate.

[0033] FIG. 22B is a graph of residual life versus time.

Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments

[0034] In FIG. 1, a typical environment for diagnostic flow measurement is illustrated at 220. In FIG. 1, process variable transmitters such as flow meter 230, level transmitters 232, 234 on tank 236 and integral orifice flow meter 238 are shown connected to control system 240. Process variable transmitters can be configured to monitor one or more process variables associated with fluids in a process plant such as slurries, liquids, vapors and gasses in chemical, pulp, petroleum, gas, pharmaceutical, food and other fluid processing plants. The monitored process variables can be pressure, temperature, flow, level, pH, conductivity, turbidity, density, concentration, chemical composition or other properties of fluids. Process variable transmitter includes one or more sensors that can be either internal to the transmitter or external to the transmitter, depending on the installation needs of the process plant. Process variable transmitters generate one or more transmitter outputs that represent the sensed process variable. Transmitter outputs are configured for transmission over long distances to a controller or indicator via communication busses 242. In typical fluid processing plants, a communication buss 242 can be a 4-20 mA current loop that powers the transmitter, or a fieldbus connection, a HART protocol communication or a fiber optic connection to a controller, a control system or a readout. In transmitters powered by a 2 wire loop, power must be kept low to provide intrinsic safety in explosive atmospheres.

[0035] In FIG. 1, integral orifice flow meter 238 is provided with a diagnostic output which is also coupled along the communication bus 242 connected to it. Control system 240 can be programmed to display the diagnostic output for a human operator, or can be programmed to alter its operation when there is a diagnostic warning from flow meter 238. Control system 240 controls the operation of output devices such as control valve 244, pump motors or other controlling devices.

[0036] In FIG. 2, an exploded view of a typical diagnostic transmitter 82 according to the present invention is shown generally. Transmitter 82 includes a flange 83 for receiving a differential pressure, a differential pressure sensor 31, electronics including an analog to digital converter 84, a microprocessor system 88, a digital to analog converter 96, and a digital communications circuit 100. Transmitter 82 is bolted to flange adapter 87. Microprocessor 88 is programmed with diagnostic algorithms as explained by examples shown in FIGS. 3, 6, 14 and 15. Flange adapter 87 connects to impulse pipes which, in turn, connect to flow around a primary flow element (not shown in FIG. 2). The arrangement of transmitter 82 of FIG. 2 is explained in more detail in FIG. 3.

[0037] In FIG. 3, a block diagram shows a first embodiment of a fluid flow meter 80 adapted to sense fluid flow 22 in pipe 24. Fluid flow meter 80 includes a pressure generator 26 that includes a primary element 28 and impulse lines 30 that couple pressures generated in the fluid flow around the primary element 28 to a differential pressure sensor 31 in a pressure transmitter 82. The term “pressure generator” as used in this application means a primary element (e.g., an orifice plate, a pitot tube, a nozzle, a venturi, a shedding bar, a bend in a pipe or other flow discontinuity adapted to cause a pressure drop in flow) together with impulse pipes or impulse passageways that couple the pressure drop from locations near the primary element to a location outside the flow pipe. The spectral and statistical characteristics of this pressure presented by this defined “pressure generator” at a location outside the flow pipe to a connected pressure transmitter 82 can be affected by the condition of the primary element as well as on the condition of the impulse pipes. The connected pressure transmitter 82 can be a self-contained unit, or it can be fitted with remote seals as needed to fit the application. A flange 83 on the pressure transmitter 82 (or its remote seals) couples to a flange adapter 87 on the impulse lines 30 to complete the pressure connections. Pressure transmitter 82 couples to a primary flow element 28 via impulse lines 30 to sense flow. The pressure transmitter 82 comprises a differential pressure sensor 31 adapted to couple to the impulse lines 30 via a flange arrangement. An analog to digital converter 84 couples to the pressure sensor 31 and generates a series of digital representations of the sensed pressure at 86. A microprocessor system 88 receives the series of digital representations of pressure at 86 and has a first algorithm 90 stored therein calculating a difference between the series of digital representations 86 and a moving average of the series of digital representations. A second algorithm 92 is also stored in the microprocessor system 88 that receives the difference calculated by algorithm 90 and calculates a trained data set of historical data during a training mode and calculates a current data set during a monitoring mode and generates diagnostic data 94 as a function of the current data set relative to the historical data indicating changes in the condition of pressure generator 26. A digital to analog converter 96 coupled to the microprocessor system 88 generates an analog transmitter output 98 indicative of the sensed flow rate. A digital communication circuit 100 receives the diagnostic data 94 from the microprocessor system 88 and generates a transmitter output 102 indicating the diagnostic data. The analog output 98 and the diagnostic data 102 can be coupled to indicators or controllers as desired.

[0038] In FIG. 4, a block diagram shows a further embodiment of a fluid flow meter 20 adapted to sense fluid flow 22 in pipe 24. The fluid flow meter 20 in FIG. 4 is similar to the fluid flow meters 80 of FIG. 3 and the same reference numerals used in FIGS. 3 are also used in FIG. 4 for similar elements. Fluid flow meter 20 includes a pressure generator 26 that includes a primary element 28 and impulse lines 30 that couple pressures generated in the fluid flow around the primary element 28 to a differential pressure sensor 31 in a pressure transmitter 32. The pressure transmitter 32 can be a self-contained unit, or it can be fitted with remote seals as needed to fit the application. A flange on the pressure transmitter 32 (or its remote seals) couples to a flange adapter on the impulse lines 30 to complete the pressure connections. A flow circuit 34 in the pressure transmitter 32 couples to the sensor 31 and generates a flow rate output 36 that can couple to a controller or indicator as needed.

[0039] In FIG. 4, a difference circuit 42 couples to the sensor 31 and generates data at a difference output 44 representing the sensed pressure minus a moving average. A calculate circuit 46 receives the difference output 44 and calculates a trained output 48 of historical data obtained during a training mode or time interval. After training, calculate circuit 46 calculates a monitor output 50 of current data obtained during a monitoring mode or normal operation time of the fluid flow meter 20.

[0040] In FIG. 4, a diagnostic circuit 52 receives the trained output 48 and the monitor output 50 and generating a diagnostic output 54 indicating a current condition of the pressure generator 26 relative to an historical condition. In FIG. 4, calculate circuit 46 stores the historical data in circuit 56 which includes memory.

[0041] In difference circuit 42, the moving average is calculated according to the series in Eq. 1:

\begin{matrix} A_{j} = \sum_{k = 0}^{m} (P_{j + k}) (W_{k}) & Eq . 1 \end{matrix}

[0042] where A is the moving average, P is a series of sequentially sensed pressure values, and W is a numerical weight for a sensed pressure value, m is a number of previous sensed pressure values in the series. Provision can also be made in difference circuit 42 to filter out spikes and other anomalies present in the sensed pressure. In FIG. 4, the historical data comprises statistical data, for example, the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of the difference output or other statistical measurements, and the diagnostic output 54 indicates impulse line plugging. The calculate circuit 46 switches between a training mode when it is installed and a monitoring mode when it is in use measuring flow. The calculate circuit 46 stores historical data in the training mode. The diagnostic output 54 indicates a real time condition of the pressure generator 26.

[0043] In FIG. 4, statistical data, such as the mean μ and standard deviation μ, are calculated based on a relatively large number of data points or flow measurements. The corresponding sample statistical data, such as sample mean X and sample standard deviation s, are calculated from a relatively smaller number of data points. Typically, hundreds of data points are used to calculate statistical data such as μ and σ, while only about 10 data points are used to calculate sample statistical data such as X and s. The number of data points during monitoring is kept smaller in order to provide diagnostics that is real time, or completed in about 1 second. Diagnostic circuit 52 indicates line plugging if the sample standard deviation s deviates from the standard deviation a by a preset amount, for example 10%.

[0044] In FIG. 5, a fluid flow meter 60 is shown that diagnoses the condition of the primary element 28. The fluid flow meter 60 in FIG. 5 is similar to the fluid flow meter 20 of FIG. 4 and the same reference numerals used in FIG. 4 are also used in 5 for similar elements. In 5, the diagnostic output 62 indicates a condition of the primary element 28, while in FIG. 4, the diagnostic output indicates a condition of the impulse lines 30. In FIG. 5, calculate circuit 46 calculates and stores data on power spectral density (PSD) of the difference output 44 rather than statistical data which is used in FIG. 4. The power spectral density data is preferably in the range of 0 to 100 Hertz. The center frequency of a bandpass filter can be swept across a selected range of frequencies to generate a continuous or quasi-continuous power spectral density as a function of frequency in a manner that is well known. Various known Fourier transforms can be used.

[0045] Power spectral density, Fi, can also be calculated using Welch's method of averaged periodograms for a given data set. The method uses a measurement sequence x(n) sampled at fs samples per second, where n=1, 2, . . . N. A front end filter with a filter frequency less than fs/2 is used to reduce aliasing in the spectral calculations. The data set is divided into F_k,ias shown in Eq. 2:

\begin{matrix} F_{k, i} = (1 / M) {| \sum_{n = 1}^{M} x_{k} (n) ⅇ^{- j 2_{π} ⅈ Δ fn} |}^{2} & Eq . 2 \end{matrix}

[0046] There are F_k,ioverlapping data segments and for each segment, a periodogram is calculated where M is the number of points in the current segment. After all periodograms for all segments are evaluated, all of them are averaged to calculate the power spectrum:

\begin{matrix} Fi = (1 / L) \sum_{k = 1}^{L} F_{k, i} & Eq . 3 \end{matrix}

[0047] Once a power spectrum is obtained for a training mode, this sequence is stored in memory, preferably EEPROM, as the baseline power spectrum for comparison to real time power spectrums. Fi is thus the power spectrum sequence and i goes from 1 to N which is the total number of points in the original data sequence. N, usually a power of 2, also sets the frequency resolution of the spectrum estimation. Therefore, Fi is also known as the signal strength at the i^thfrequency. The power spectrum typically includes a large number points at predefined frequency intervals, defining a shape of the spectral power distribution as a function of frequency.

[0048] In the detection of the primary element degradation, a relatively larger sample of the spectral density at baseline historical conditions and a relatively smaller sample of the spectral density at monitoring conditions are compared. The relatively smaller sample allows for a real time indication of problems in about 1 second. An increase in the related frequency components of the power spectrum can indicate the degradation of the primary element. Using orifice plates as primary elements, for example, changes as high as 10% are observed in spectral components when the orifice plate is degraded to a predetermined level. The amount of change can be adjusted as needed, depending on the tolerable amount of degradation and the type of primary element in use. The amount of change needed to indicate a problem is arrived at experimentally for each type of primary element arrangement. Fuzzy logic can also be used to compare the many points of the power spectrums.

[0049] In FIG. 6, a flow chart 120 of a method of diagnosis performed in a pressure transmitter couplable to a primary flow element via impulse lines is shown. The algorithm starts at 122. A moving average is subtracted from differential pressure data as shown at 124 to calculate a difference. During a train mode, historical data on the calculated difference is acquired and stored at 126 as statistical data μ and μ, for example. During an operational MONITOR mode, current data on the difference is acquired and stored at 128 as statistical data X and s. The smaller sample of current data is compared to the larger sample of the historical data to diagnose the condition of the impulse lines. Comparisons of historical and current statistical data are made at 132, 134, 136 and a selected diagnostic transmitter output is generated at 138, 140, 142 as a function of the comparisons made at 130, 132, 134, 136 respectively. After completion of any diagnostic output, the process loops back at 144 to repeat the monitor mode diagnostics, or the transmitter can be shut down until maintenance is performed. If the diagnostic process itself fails, an error indication is provided on the diagnostic output at 146. In the method 120 of diagnosis, the historical data set comprises statistical data such as data on the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of the calculated difference; the current data set comprises current sample statistical data, such as the sample average (X) and sample deviation (s) of the calculated difference. The sample deviation (s) is compared to the standard deviation (σ) to diagnose impulse line plugging, for example. Other known statistical measures of uncertainty, or statistical measures developed experimentally to fit this application can also be used besides mean and standard deviation. When there is an unusual flow condition where X is much different than μ, the diagnostics can be temporarily suspended as shown at 130 until usual flow conditions are reestablished. This helps to prevent false alarm indications.

[0050] In FIGS. 2-5, the transmitter generates a calibrated output and also a diagnostic output that indicates if the pressure generator is out of calibration. In FIGS. 2-5, the primary element can comprise a simple pitot tube or an averaging pitot tube. The averaging pitot tube 63 can be inserted through a tap 64 on a pipe as shown in FIG. 7. An instrument manifold 66, as shown in FIG. 8, can be coupled between the pressure generator 26 and a pressure transmitter 68. The primary element 28 and impulse pipes 30 can be combined in an integral orifice as shown in FIG. 9. An orifice plate adapted for clamping between pipe flanges is shown in FIG. 10. The primary element can comprise a venturi as shown in FIG. 11 or a nozzle as shown in FIG. 12, or an orifice as shown in FIG. 13. A standard arrangement of a pressure generator can be used with a transmitter that is adapted to provide the diagnostics outputs. The transmitter adapts itself to the characteristics of the pressure generator during the training mode and, has a standard of comparison stored during the training mode that is available for comparison during the monitoring or operational mode. The standard of comparison can be adjusted as needed by a technician via the digital communication bus. In each arrangement, the fluid flow meter provides a calibrated flow rate output and the diagnostic output of the transmitter indicates if the pressure generator is out of calibration.

[0051] In FIG. 14, a flow chart 160 of a process for diagnosing the condition of a primary element is shown. The condition of the primary element can include erosion or fouling of the primary element. The method or algorithm starts at 162. Sensor data is taken in a training mode or time interval as shown at 164. A power spectrum of the sensor data, minus the moving average, is calculated at 166. The power spectrum obtained is identified as the training power spectrum at 168 and stored in non-volatile memory 170. After completion of training, the process moves on to monitoring or normal use. A further power spectrum of current sensor data, minus the moving average, is evaluated at 172, and the power spectrum so obtained in stored in memory 174, that can be either RAM or nonvolatile memory. At 176, the power spectrum Fi obtained during training is compared to the power spectrum Fi obtained during monitoring. If there is a significant difference between Fi and Fi which is indicative of a problem with the primary element, a primary element warning (PE Warning) is generated as shown at 178. If the power spectrums Fi and Fi are sufficiently similar, then no primary element warning is generated. After the comparison at 176 and generation of a PE Warning, as needed, program flow moves to obtain new real time sensor data at 180 and the monitoring process moves on to a new evaluation at 172, or the flow meter can shut down when there is a PE warning. The process 160 can loop continuously in the monitoring mode to provide real time information concerning the condition of the primary element.

[0052] In FIG. 15, a flow chart illustrates a process 190 which provides diagnosis of both primary element (PE) and impulse lines (IL). Program flow starts at 200. During a training mode illustrated at 202, sensor data, minus a moving average, is obtained and training power spectrum and training statistics are stored in nonvolatile memory as explained above. Next, impulse line diagnostics (such as those explained in process 128 in FIG. 6) are performed at step 204 in FIG. 15. In FIG. 15, after impulse line diagnostics are performed, current impulse line statistics are compared to historical (training) impulse line statistics (as detailed in processes 130, 132, 134, 136 in FIG. 6) at 206. If the comparison indicates a problem with plugging of impulse lines, then an impulse line warning is generated as shown at 208. If no problem with the impulse lines is apparent, then program flow moves on to primary element (PE) diagnostics at 210. At process 210, power spectral density for the current real time data is calculated (as explained above in connection with FIG. 14). The current power spectral density is compared to the historical power spectral density at 212, and if there is a difference large enough to indicate a problem with the primary element, then a PE Warning is generated as shown at 214. If the differences in the power spectral densities are small, then no PE warning is generated as shown at 216. Program flow continues on at 218 to repeat the IL and PE diagnostics, or the flow meter can be shut down if there is a PE or IL warning until maintenance is performed.

[0053] Any of the methods can be stored on a computer-readable medium as a plurality of sequences of instructions, the plurality of sequences of instructions including sequences that, when executed by a microprocessor system in a pressure transmitter cause the pressure transmitter to perform a diagnostic method relative to a primary element and impulse lines couplable to the transmitter.

[0054] FIG. 16 illustrates a transmitter 230 which includes remote seals 232, 234 connected by flexible capillary tubes 236, 238 that are filled with a controlled quantity of isolation fluid such as silicon oil. The isolator arrangement permits placement of the sensor and electronics of transmitter 230 to be spaced away from extremely hot process fluids which contact the remote seals. The diagnostic circuitry of transmitter 230 can also be used to detect leaking and pinching off of capillary tubes 236, 238 using the diagnostic techniques described above to provide diagnostic output 239.

[0055] FIG. 17 schematically illustrates a transmitter 240 which is connected to taps 248, 250 near the bottom and top of tank 242. Transmitter 240 provides an output 244 that represents a time integral of flow in and out of the tank 242. Transmitter 240 includes circuitry, or alternatively software, that measures the differential pressure between the taps 248, 250 and computes the integrated flow as a function of the sensed differential pressure and a formula stored in the transmitter relating the sensed pressure to the quantity of fluid in the tank. This formula is typically called a strapping function and the quantity of fluid which has flowed into or out of the tank can be integrated as either volumetric or mass flow, depending on the strapping function stored in transmitter 240. The diagnostic circuitry or software in transmitter 240 operates as explained above to provide diagnostic output 252. FIG. 17 is a schematic illustration, and transmitter 240 can be located either near the bottom or the top of tank 242, with a tube going to the other end of the tank, often called a “leg.” This leg can be either a wet leg filled with the fluid in the tank, or a dry leg filled with gas. Remote seals can also be used with transmitter 240.

[0056] In one embodiment, microprocessor system 88 includes signal preprocessor which is coupled to sensor 88 through analog to digital converter 84 which isolates signal components in the sensor signal such as frequencies, amplitudes or signal characteristics which are related to a plugged impulse line 30 or degraded primary element 28. The signal preprocessor provides an isolated signal output to a signal evaluator in microprocessor 88. The signal preprocessor isolates a portion of the signal by filtering, performing a wavelet transform, performing a Fourier transform, use of a neural network, statistical analysis, or other signal evaluation techniques. Such preprocessing is preferably implemented in microprocessor 88 or in a specialized digital signal processor. The isolated signal output is related to a plugged or plugging impulse line 30 or degraded primary element 28 sensed by sensor 31.

[0057] The signal components are isolated through signal processing techniques in which only desired frequencies or other signal characteristics such as amplitude are identified and an indication of their identification is provided. Depending upon the strength signals to be detected and their frequency, signal preprocessor can comprise a filter, for example a band pass filter, to generate the isolated signal output. For more sensitive isolation, advanced signal processing techniques are utilized such as a Fast Fourier transform (FFT) to obtain the spectrum of the sensor signal. In one preferred embodiment, the signal preprocessor comprises a wavelet processor which performs a wavelet analysis on the sensor signal as shown in FIGS. 18, 19 and 20 using a discrete wavelet transform. Wavelet analysis is well suited for analyzing signals which have transients or other non-stationary characteristics in the time domain. In contrast to Fourier transforms, wavelet analysis retains information in the time domain, i.e., when the event occurred.

[0058] Wavelet analysis is a technique for transforming a time domain signal into the frequency domain which, like a Fourier transformation, allows the frequency components to be identified. However, unlike a Fourier transformation, in a wavelet transformation the output includes information related to time. This may be expressed in the form of a three dimensional graph with time shown on one axis, frequency on a second axis and signal amplitude on a third axis. A discussion of wavelet analysis is given in On-Line Tool Condition Monitoring System With Wavelet Fuzzy Neural Network, by L. Xiaoli et al., 8 JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING pgs. 271-276 (1997). In performing a continuous wavelet transformation, a portion of the sensor signal is windowed and convolved with a wavelet function. This convolution is performed by superimposing the wavelet function at the beginning of a sample, multiplying the wavelet function with the signal and then integrating the result over the sample period. The result of the integration is scaled and provides the first value for continuous wavelet transform at time equals zero. This point may be then mapped onto a three dimensional plane. The wavelet function is then shifted right (forward in time) and the multiplication and integration steps are repeated to obtain another set of data points which are mapped onto the 3-D space. This process is repeated and the wavelet is moved (convolved) through the entire signal. The wavelet function is then scaled, which changes the frequency resolution of the transformation, and the above steps are repeated.

[0059] Data from a wavelet transformation of a sensor signal from sensor 31 is shown in FIG. 18. The data is graphed in three dimensions and forms a surface 270. As shown in the graph of FIG. 18, the sensor signal includes a small signal peak at about 1 kHz at time t₁and another peak at about 100 Hz at time t₂. Through subsequent processing by the signal evaluator, surface 270 or portions of surface 270 are evaluated to determine impulse piping or primary element degradation.

[0060] The continuous wavelet transformation described above requires extensive computations. Therefore, in one embodiment, microprocessor 88 performs a discrete wavelet transform (DWT) which is well suited for implementation in microprocessor system. One efficient discrete wavelet transform uses the Mallat algorithm which is a two channel sub-band coder. The Mallet algorithm provides a series of separated or decomposed signals which are representative of individual frequency components of the original signal. FIG. 19 shows an example of such a system in which an original sensor signal S is decomposed using a sub-band coder of a Mallet algorithm. The signal S has a frequency range from 0 to a maximum of f_MAX. The signal is passed simultaneously through a first high pass filter having a frequency range from ½ f_MAXto f_MAX, and a low pass filter having a frequency range from 0 to ½ f_MAX.

[0061] This process is called decomposition. The output from the high pass filter provides “level 1” discrete wavelet transform coefficients. The level 1 coefficients represent the amplitude as a function of time of that portion of the input signal which is between ½ f_maxand f_MAXThe output from the 0-½ f_maxlow pass filter is passed through subsequent high pass (¼ f_max-¼ f_max) and low pass (0-½ f_max) filters, as desired, to provide additional levels (beyond “level 1”) of discrete wavelet transform coefficients. The outputs from each low pass filter can be subjected to further decompositions offering additional levels of discrete wavelet transformation coefficients as desired. This process continues until the desired resolution is achieved or the number of remaining data samples after a decomposition yields no additional information. The resolution of the wavelet transform is chosen to be approximately the same as the sensor or the same as the minimum signal resolution required to monitor the signal. Each level of DWT coefficients is representative of signal amplitude as a function of time for a given frequency range. Coefficients for each frequency range are concatenated to form a graph such as that shown in FIG. 18.

[0062] In some embodiments, padding is added to the signal by adding data to the sensor signal near the borders of windows used in the wavelet analysis. This padding reduces distortions in the frequency domain output. This technique can be used with a continuous wavelet transform or a discrete wavelet transform. “Padding” is defined as appending extra data on either side of the current active data window, for example, extra data points are added which extend 25% of the current window beyond either window edge. In one embodiment, the padding is generated by repeating a portion of the data in the current window so that the added data “pads” the existing signal on either side. The entire data set is then fit to a quadratic equation which is used to extrapolate the signal 25% beyond the active data window.

[0063] FIG. 20 is an example showing a signal S generated by sensor 31 and the resultant approximation signals yielded in seven decomposition levels labeled level 1 through level 7. In this example, signal level 7 is representative of the lowest frequency DWT coefficient which can be generated. Any further decomposition yields noise. All levels, or only those levels which relate impulse piping or primary element degradation are provided.

[0064] Microprocessor 88 evaluates the isolated signal received from the signal preprocessing and in one embodiment, monitors an amplitude of a certain frequency or range of frequencies identified and provides a diagnostic output if a threshold is exceeded. Signal evaluator can also comprise more advanced decision making algorithms such as fuzzy logic, neural networks, expert systems, rule based systems, etc. Commonly assigned U.S. Patent application Ser. No. 08/623,569 describes various decision making systems which can be implemented in signal evaluator 154 and is incorporated herein by reference.

[0065] Microprocessor 88 performs diagnostics related to the impulse piping or primary element using information derived from the differential pressure sensor 31. The following describes a number, of embodiments for realizing a diagnostic circuit. The diagnostic circuit can provide a residual lifetime estimate, an indication of a failure, an indication of an intending failure or a calibration output which is used to correct for errors in the sensed process variable.

[0066] A. POLYNOMIAL CURVEFIT

[0067] In one embodiment of the present invention empirical models or polynomial curve-fitting are used to detect line plugging or primary element degradation. A polynomial-like equation which has a combination of input signals such as various statistical parameters can be used to detect primary element degradation or impulse line plugging. Constants for the equations can be stored in a memory in the transmitter or received over the communication loop 242.

[0068] B. NEURAL NETWORKS

[0069] The signal can be analyzed using a neural network. One such neural network is a multi-layer neural network. Although a number of training algorithms can be used to develop a neural network model for different goals. One embodiment includes the known Backpropagation Network (BPN) to develop neural network modules which will capture the nonlinear relationship among a set of input and output(s). FIG. 21 shows a typical topology *of a three-layer neural network architecture implemented in microprocessor 88. The first layer, usually referred to as the input buffer, receives the information, and feeds them into the inner layers. The second layer, in a three-layer network, commonly known as a hidden layer, receives the information from the input layer, modified by the weights on the connections and propagates this information forward. This is illustrated in the hidden layer which is used to characterize the nonlinear properties of the system analyzed. The last layer is the output layer where the calculated outputs (estimations) are presented to the environment.

[0070] FIG. 22A shows a schematic of a neural network which provides a residual life estimate for a primary element or impulse pipe based upon a sensor signal. The sensor signal can be either a raw sensor signal or a sensor signal which has been processed through signal processing techniques. FIG. 22B is a graph of residual life versus time and shows that an alarm level can be set prior to an estimated failure time. This allows the system to provide an alarm output prior to actual failure of the device.

[0071] C. THRESHOLD CIRCUITRY

[0072] This embodiment uses a set of if-then rules to reach a conclusion on the status of the impulse piping or primary element. This embodiment may be implemented easily in analog or digital circuitry. For example, with a simple rule, if the signal drops a certain amount below a historical mean, an output can be provided which indicates that an impulse line is plugged or is in the process of becoming plugged. Of course, more complex rules can be used which use multiple statistical parameters or signal components of the sensor signal to provide more accurate or different information.

[0073] D. WAVELETS

[0074] With this embodiment, one or more of the decomposition signal(s) in a wavelet analysis directly relate to line plugging and are used to diagnose the transmitter.

[0075] Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, various function blocks of the invention have been described in terms of circuitry, however, many function blocks may be implemented in other forms such as digital and analog circuits, software and their hybrids. When implemented in software, a microprocessor performs the functions and the signals comprise digital values on which the software operates. A general purpose processor programmed with instructions that cause the processor to perform the desired process elements, application specific hardware components that contain circuit wired to perform the desired elements and any combination of programming a general purpose processor and hardware components can be used. Deterministic or fuzzy logic techniques can be used as needed to make decisions in the circuitry or software. Because of the nature of complex digital circuitry, circuit elements may not be partitioned into separate blocks as shown, but components used for various functional blocks can be intermingled and shared. Likewise with software, some instructions can be shared as part of several functions and be intermingled with unrelated instructions within the scope of the invention.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A pressure transmitter adapted to couple to a primary flow element via impulse lines to sense flow, the pressure transmitter comprising:

a differential pressure sensor adapted to couple to the impulse lines to sense a pressure;

an analog to digital converter coupled to the pressure sensor and generating a series of digital representations of the pressure;

a microprocessor system receiving the series of digital representations of pressure and having

a first algorithm stored therein to calculate a difference between the series of digital representations and a moving average of the series of digital representations, and having

a second algorithm stored therein to receive the difference and calculate a trained data set of historical data during a training mode and calculating a current data set during a monitoring mode and generating diagnostic data as a function of the current data set relative to the historical data indicating changes in the condition of flow sensing;

a digital to analog converter coupled to the microprocessor system generating an analog transmitter output indicative of flow; and

a digital communication circuit receiving the diagnostic data from the microprocessor system and generating a transmitter output indicating the diagnostic data.

2. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor system stores the trained data set.

3. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the moving average is calculated according to a series

A_{j} = \sum_{k = 0}^{m} (P_{j + k}) (W_{k})

where A is the moving average, P is a series of sensed pressure values, and W is a weight for a sensed pressure value, m is a number of previous sensed pressure values in the series, k is an integer ranging from 0 to m and j identifies a sample number.

4. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the trained data set comprises statistical data.

5. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the microprocessor system switches from the training mode to the monitoring mode.

6. The pressure transmitter of claim 5 wherein the microprocessor system stores the trained data set in the training mode.

7. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic data indicates a real time condition of a pressure generator.

8. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic data indicates a condition of the primary flow element.

9. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the diagnostic data indicates a condition of the impulse lines.

10. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the analog transmitter output comprises a calibrated output, and the diagnostic data transmitter output indicates if the pressure sensor is out of calibration.

11. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the trained data set of historical data comprises power spectral density of the difference.

12. The pressure transmitter of claim 11 wherein the power spectral density data is in the range of 0 to 100 Hertz.

13. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the pressure transmitter is adapted to couple to a pitot tube primary flow element.

14. The pressure transmitter of claim 13 wherein the pitot tube is an averaging pitot tube.

15. The pressure transmitter of claim 14 wherein the averaging pitot tube is insertable through a tap on a pipe.

16. The pressure transmitter of claim 13 further comprising an instrument manifold coupled between the pressure generator and the pressure sensor.

17. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the primary flow element and impulse lines are combined in an integral orifice.

18. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the pressure transmitter is adapted to couple to a venturi primary flow element.

19. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the pressure transmitter is adapted to couple to a nozzle primary flow element.

20. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the pressure transmitter is adapted to couple to an orifice primary flow element adapted for clamping between pipe flanges.

21. A pressure transmitter adapted to couple to a primary flow element via impulse lines to sense flow, the pressure transmitter comprising:

a differential pressure sensor adapted to couple to the impulse lines to sense a pressure;

a flow circuit coupled to the sensor to generate a flow output;

a difference circuit coupled to the sensor to generate a difference output representing the sensed pressure minus a moving average;

a calculate circuit to receive the difference output, calculate a trained output of historical data obtained during training, and calculate a monitor output of current data obtained during monitoring; and

a diagnostic circuit to receive the trained output and the monitor output and generate a diagnostic output indicating a current condition of flow sensing relative to an historical condition of flow sensing.

22. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the differential pressure sensor includes remote seals.

23. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the flow output is a time integral of flow indicating a quantity of fluid in a tank.

24. The pressure transmitter of claim 23 further including a wet leg.

25. The pressure transmitter of claim 23 further including a dry leg.

26. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the calculate circuit stores the historical data.

27. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the moving average is calculated according to the series

A_{j} = \sum_{k = 0}^{m} (P_{j + k}) (W_{k})

28. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the historical data comprises statistical data.

29. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the calculate circuit switches between a training mode and a monitoring mode.

30. The pressure transmitter of claim 29 wherein the calculate circuit stores historical data in the monitoring mode.

31. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the diagnostic output comprises a real time indication of the condition of a pressure generator.

32. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the diagnostic circuit indicates a condition of the primary element.

33. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the diagnostic circuit indicates a condition of the impulse lines.

34. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the flow output comprises a calibrated output and the diagnostic circuit indicates if the pressure sensor is out of calibration.

35. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the historical data comprises power spectral density of the difference output.

36. The pressure transmitter of claim 35 wherein the power spectral density data is in the range of 0 to 100 Hertz.

37. The pressure transmitter of claim 21 wherein the diagnostic circuit implements a diagnostic algorithm selected from the group of algorithms consisting of neural networks, fuzzy logic, wavelets and Fourier transforms.

38. A fluid flow meter adapted to sense fluid flow, comprising,

a pressure generator having a primary element and impulse lines couplable to the fluid flow;

a differential pressure sensor coupled to the impulse lines to sense a pressure;

a flow circuit coupled to the sensor to generate a flow output;

a difference circuit coupled to the sensor to generate a difference output representing the sensed pressure minus a moving average of the sensed pressure;

a calculate circuit to receive the difference output and calculate a trained output of historical data obtained during training and calculating a monitor output of current data obtained during monitoring; and

a diagnostic circuit to receive the trained output and the monitor output and generate a diagnostic output indicating a current condition of the pressure generator relative to an historical condition.

39. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the calculate circuit stores the historical data.

40. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the moving average is calculated according to the series

A_{j} = \sum_{k = 0}^{m} (P_{j + k}) (W_{k})

41. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the historical data comprises statistical data.

42. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the calculate circuit switches between a training mode and a monitoring mode.

43. The fluid flow meter of claim 42 wherein the calculate circuit stores the historical data in the training mode.

44. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the diagnostic output indicates a real time condition of the pressure generator.

45. The fluid flow meter of claim 44 wherein the diagnostic output indicates a condition of the primary element.

46. The fluid flow meter of claim 44 wherein the diagnostic output indicates a condition of the impulse lines.

47. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the flow output comprises a calibrated output and the diagnostic output indicates if the pressure generator is out of calibration.

48. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the historical data comprises power spectral density of the difference output.

49. The fluid flow meter of claim 48 wherein the power spectral density data is in the range of 0 to 100 Hertz.

50. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the primary element comprises a pitot tube.

51. The fluid flow meter of claim 50 wherein the pitot tube is an averaging pitot tube.

52. The fluid flow meter of claim 51 wherein the averaging pitot tube is inserted through a tap on a pipe.

53. The fluid flow meter of claim 50 further comprising an instrument manifold coupled between the pressure generator and the pressure sensor.

54. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the primary element and impulse lines are combined in an integral orifice.

55. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the primary element comprises a venturi.

56. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the primary element comprises a nozzle.

57. The fluid flow meter of claim 38 wherein the primary element comprises an orifice plate adapted for clamping between pipe flanges.

58. The flow meter of claim 38 wherein the diagnostic current implements a diagnostic algorithm selected from the group of algorithms consisting of neural networks, fuzzy logic, wavelets and Fourier transforms.

59. A diagnostic method performed in a pressure transmitter coupled to a primary flow element via impulse lines, the method comprising:

calculating a difference between a pressure sensed by the pressure transmitter and a moving average of the sensed pressure;

acquiring and storing an historical data set of the calculated difference during a train mode of the pressure transmitter;

acquiring and storing a current data set of the calculated difference during a monitoring mode of the pressure transmitter;

comparing the current data set to the historical data set to diagnose the condition of the primary flow element and impulse lines; and

generating output of the pressure transmitter indicating the condition of the primary flow element and impulse lines.

60. The method of diagnosis of claim 59 wherein the historical data set comprises statistical data on the calculated difference.

61. The method of diagnosis of claim 60 wherein the current data set comprises current data on a sample average (X) and a sample standard deviation (s) of the calculated difference.

62. The method of diagnosis of claim 61 wherein the sample average (X) is compared to a mean (μ) to diagnose erosion of the primary flow element.

63. The method of diagnosis of claim 62 wherein the sample deviation (s) is compared to the standard deviation (σ) to diagnose impulse line plugging.

64. The method of diagnosis of claim 59 wherein the historical data set comprises data on the power spectral density of the calculated difference.

65. The method of diagnosis of claim 64 wherein the current data set comprises data on the power spectral density of the calculated difference.

66. The method of diagnosis of claim 59 wherein the comparing includes performing a diagnostic algorithm selected from the group of algorithms consisting of neural networks, fuzzy logic, wavelets and Fourier transforms.

67. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions executable by a microprocessor system in a pressure transmitter to cause the pressure transmitter to perform a diagnostic operation relative to a primary element and impulse lines couplable to the transmitter, the instructions comprising:

calculating a difference between a pressure sensed by the pressure transmitter and a moving average of the sensed pressure;

acquiring and storing an historical data set of the calculated difference during a train mode of the pressure transmitter;

acquiring and storing a current data set of the calculated difference during a monitoring mode of the pressure transmitter;

comparing the current data set to the historical data set to diagnose the condition of the primary element and impulse lines; and

generating an output of the pressure transmitter indicating the condition of the primary element and impulse lines.

68. A pressure transmitter adapted to couple to a primary flow element via impulse lines to sense flow, the pressure transmitter comprising:

a differential pressure sensor adapted to couple to the impulse lines to sense a pressure;

a flow circuit coupled to the sensor and generating a flow output;

differencing means coupled to the sensor for generating a difference output representing the sensed pressure minus a moving average of the sensed pressure;

calculating means receiving the difference output for calculating a trained output of historical data obtained during training and for calculating a monitor output of current data obtained during monitoring; and

diagnosing means receiving the trained output and the monitor output and generating a diagnostic output for diagnosing a current condition of flow sensing relative to an historical condition of flow sensing.

Patent Citations (292)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US3096434(A)	1963-07-01	King	Applicant
US3404264(A)	1968-10-01	Kugler	Applicant
US3468164(A)	1969-09-01	Sutherland	Applicant
US3590370(A)	1971-06-01	Fleischer	Applicant
US3688190(A)	1972-08-01	Blum	Applicant
US3691842(A)	1972-09-01	Akeley	Applicant
US3701280(A)	1972-10-01	Stroman	Applicant
US3849637(A)	1974-11-01	Caruso et al.	Applicant
US3855858(A)	1974-12-01	Cushing	Applicant
US3952759(A)	1976-04-01	Ottenstein	Applicant
US3973184(A)	1976-08-01	Raber	Applicant
USRE29383(E)	1977-09-01	Gallatin et al.	Applicant
US4058975(A)	1977-11-01	Gilbert et al.	Applicant
US4099413(A)	1978-07-01	Ohte et al.	Applicant
US4102199(A)	1978-07-01	Talpouras	Applicant
US4122719(A)	1978-10-01	Carlson et al.	Applicant
US4249164(A)	1981-02-01	Tivy	Applicant
US4250490(A)	1981-02-01	Dahlke	Applicant
US4279013(A)	1981-07-01	Cameron et al.	Applicant
US4337516(A)	1982-06-01	Murphy et al.	Applicant
US4399824(A)	1983-08-01	Davidson	Applicant
US4417312(A)	1983-11-01	Cronin et al.	Applicant
US4517468(A)	1985-05-01	Kemper et al.	Applicant
US4530234(A)	1985-07-01	Cullick et al.	Applicant
US4571689(A)	1986-02-01	Hildebrand et al.	Applicant
US4630265(A)	1986-12-01	Sexton	Applicant
US4635214(A)	1987-01-01	Kasai et al.	Applicant
US4642782(A)	1987-02-01	Kemper et al.	Applicant
US4644479(A)	1987-02-01	Kemper et al.	Applicant
US4649515(A)	1987-03-01	Thompson et al.	Applicant
US4686638(A)	1987-08-01	Furuse	Examiner
US4707796(A)	1987-11-01	Calabro et al.	Applicant
US4736367(A)	1988-04-01	Wroblewski et al.	Applicant
US4736763(A)	1988-04-01	Britton et al.	Examiner
US4777585(A)	1988-10-01	Kokawa et al.	Applicant
US4818994(A)	1989-04-01	Orth et al.	Applicant
US4831564(A)	1989-05-01	Suga	Applicant
US4841286(A)	1989-06-01	Kummer	Applicant
US4853693(A)	1989-08-01	Eaton-Williams	Applicant
US4873655(A)	1989-10-01	Kondraske	Applicant
US4907167(A)	1990-03-01	Skeirik	Applicant
US4924418(A)	1990-05-01	Backman et al.	Applicant
US4934196(A)	1990-06-01	Romano	Applicant
US4939753(A)	1990-07-01	Olson	Applicant
US4964125(A)	1990-10-01	Kim	Applicant
US4988990(A)	1991-01-01	Warrior	Applicant
US4992965(A)	1991-02-01	Holter et al.	Applicant
US5005142(A)	1991-04-01	Lipchak et al.	Applicant
US5043862(A)	1991-08-01	Takahashi et al.	Applicant
US5053815(A)	1991-10-01	Wendell	Applicant
US5067099(A)	1991-11-01	McCown et al.	Applicant
US5081598(A)	1992-01-01	Bellows et al.	Applicant
US5089984(A)	1992-02-01	Struger et al.	Applicant
US5098197(A)	1992-03-01	Shepard et al.	Applicant
US5099436(A)	1992-03-01	McCown et al.	Applicant
US5103409(A)	1992-04-01	Shimizu et al.	Applicant
US5111531(A)	1992-05-01	Grayson et al.	Applicant
US5121467(A)	1992-06-01	Skeirik	Applicant
US5122794(A)	1992-06-01	Warrior	Applicant
US5122976(A)	1992-06-01	Bellows et al.	Applicant
US5130936(A)	1992-07-01	Sheppard et al.	Applicant
US5134574(A)	1992-07-01	Beaverstock et al.	Applicant
US5137370(A)	1992-08-01	McCullock et al.	Applicant
US5142612(A)	1992-08-01	Skeirik	Applicant
US5143452(A)	1992-09-01	Maxedon et al.	Applicant
US5148378(A)	1992-09-01	Shibayama et al.	Applicant
US5167009(A)	1992-11-01	Skeirik	Applicant
US5175678(A)	1992-12-01	Frerichs et al.	Applicant
US5193143(A)	1993-03-01	Kaemmerer et al.	Applicant
US5197114(A)	1993-03-01	Skeirik	Applicant
US5197328(A)	1993-03-01	Fitzgerald	Applicant
US5212765(A)	1993-05-01	Skeirik	Applicant
US5214582(A)	1993-05-01	Gray	Applicant
US5216226(A)	1993-06-01	Miyoshi	Applicant
US5224203(A)	1993-06-01	Skeirik	Applicant
US5228780(A)	1993-07-01	Shepard et al.	Applicant
US5235527(A)	1993-08-01	Ogawa et al.	Applicant
US5265031(A)	1993-11-01	Malczewski	Applicant
US5265222(A)	1993-11-01	Nishiya et al.	Applicant
US5269311(A)	1993-12-01	Kirchner et al.	Applicant
US5274572(A)	1993-12-01	O'Neill et al.	Applicant
US5282131(A)	1994-01-01	Rudd et al.	Applicant
US5282261(A)	1994-01-01	Skeirik	Applicant
US5293585(A)	1994-03-01	Morita	Applicant
US5303181(A)	1994-04-01	Stockton	Applicant
US5305230(A)	1994-04-01	Matsumoto et al.	Applicant
US5311421(A)	1994-05-01	Nomura et al.	Applicant
US5317520(A)	1994-05-01	Castle	Applicant
US5327357(A)	1994-07-01	Feinstein et al.	Applicant
US5333240(A)	1994-07-01	Matsumoto et al.	Applicant
US5347843(A)	1994-09-01	Orr et al.	Applicant
US5349541(A)	1994-09-01	Alexandro, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5357449(A)	1994-10-01	Oh	Applicant
US5361628(A)	1994-11-01	Marko et al.	Applicant
US5365423(A)	1994-11-01	Chand	Applicant
US5367612(A)	1994-11-01	Bozich et al.	Applicant
US5384699(A)	1995-01-01	Levy et al.	Applicant
US5386373(A)	1995-01-01	Keller et al.	Applicant
US5388465(A)	1995-02-01	Okaniwa et al.	Applicant
US5394341(A)	1995-02-01	Kepner	Applicant
US5394543(A)	1995-02-01	Hill et al.	Applicant
US5404064(A)	1995-04-01	Mermelstein et al.	Applicant
US5408406(A)	1995-04-01	Mathur et al.	Applicant
US5408586(A)	1995-04-01	Skeirik	Applicant
US5414645(A)	1995-05-01	Hirano	Applicant
US5419197(A)	1995-05-01	Ogi et al.	Applicant
US5430642(A)	1995-07-01	Nakajima et al.	Applicant
US5434774(A)	1995-07-01	Seberger	Applicant
US5440478(A)	1995-08-01	Fisher et al.	Applicant
US5442639(A)	1995-08-01	Crowder et al.	Applicant
US5467355(A)	1995-11-01	Umeda et al.	Applicant
US5469070(A)	1995-11-01	Koluvek	Applicant
US5469156(A)	1995-11-01	Kogura	Applicant
US5469735(A)	1995-11-01	Watanabe	Applicant
US5469749(A)	1995-11-01	Shimada et al.	Applicant
US5481199(A)	1996-01-01	Anderson et al.	Applicant
US5481200(A)	1996-01-01	Voegele et al.	Applicant
US5483387(A)	1996-01-01	Bauhahn et al.	Applicant
US5485753(A)	1996-01-01	Burns et al.	Applicant
US5486996(A)	1996-01-01	Samad et al.	Applicant
US5488697(A)	1996-01-01	Kaemmerer et al.	Applicant
US5489831(A)	1996-02-01	Harris	Applicant
US5495769(A)	1996-03-01	Borden et al.	Applicant
US5510779(A)	1996-04-01	Maltby et al.	Applicant
US5511004(A)	1996-04-01	Dubost et al.	Applicant
US5548528(A)	1996-08-01	Keeler et al.	Applicant
US5560246(A)	1996-10-01	Bottinger et al.	Applicant
US5561599(A)	1996-10-01	Lu	Applicant
US5570300(A)	1996-10-01	Henry et al.	Applicant
US5572420(A)	1996-11-01	Lu	Applicant
US5573032(A)	1996-11-01	Lenz et al.	Applicant
US5591922(A)	1997-01-01	Segeral et al.	Examiner
US5598521(A)	1997-01-01	Kilgore et al.	Applicant
US5600148(A)	1997-02-01	Cole et al.	Applicant
US5608650(A)	1997-03-01	McClendon et al.	Applicant
US5623605(A)	1997-04-01	Keshav et al.	Applicant
US5629870(A)	1997-05-01	Farag et al.	Applicant
US5637802(A)	1997-06-01	Frick et al.	Applicant
US5640491(A)	1997-06-01	Bhat et al.	Applicant
US5654869(A)	1997-08-01	Ohi et al.	Applicant
US5661668(A)	1997-08-01	Yemini et al.	Applicant
US5665899(A)	1997-09-01	Willcox	Applicant
US5669713(A)	1997-09-01	Schwartz et al.	Applicant
US5671335(A)	1997-09-01	Davis et al.	Applicant
US5675504(A)	1997-10-01	Serodes et al.	Applicant
US5675724(A)	1997-10-01	Beal et al.	Applicant
US5680109(A)	1997-10-01	Lowe et al.	Applicant
US5682317(A)	1997-10-01	Keeler et al.	Applicant
US5700090(A)	1997-12-01	Eryurek	Applicant
US5703575(A)	1997-12-01	Kirkpatrick	Applicant
US5704011(A)	1997-12-01	Hansen et al.	Applicant
US5705978(A)	1998-01-01	Frick et al.	Applicant
US5708211(A)	1998-01-01	Jepson et al.	Examiner
US5708585(A)	1998-01-01	Kushion	Applicant
US5710370(A)	1998-01-01	Shanahan et al.	Examiner
US5713668(A)	1998-02-01	Lunghofer et al.	Applicant
US5719378(A)	1998-02-01	Jackson, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5741074(A)	1998-04-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US5742845(A)	1998-04-01	Wagner	Applicant
US5746511(A)	1998-05-01	Eryurek et al.	Applicant
US5752008(A)	1998-05-01	Bowling	Applicant
US5764891(A)	1998-06-01	Warrior	Applicant
US5781878(A)	1998-07-01	Mizoguchi et al.	Applicant
US5801689(A)	1998-09-01	Huntsman	Applicant
US5805442(A)	1998-09-01	Crater et al.	Applicant
US5817950(A)	1998-10-01	Wiklund et al.	Examiner
US5828567(A)	1998-10-01	Eryurek et al.	Applicant
US5829876(A)	1998-11-01	Schwartz et al.	Applicant
US5848383(A)	1998-12-01	Yuuns	Applicant
US5859964(A)	1999-01-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US5876122(A)	1999-03-01	Eryurek	Applicant
US5880376(A)	1999-03-01	Sai et al.	Applicant
US5887978(A)	1999-03-01	Lunghofer et al.	Applicant
US5908990(A)	1999-06-01	Cummings	Examiner
US5923557(A)	1999-07-01	Eidson	Applicant
US5924086(A)	1999-07-01	Mathur et al.	Applicant
US5926778(A)	1999-07-01	Pöppel	Applicant
US5936514(A)	1999-08-01	Anderson et al.	Applicant
US5940290(A)	1999-08-01	Dixon	Applicant
US5956663(A)	1999-09-01	Eryurek et al.	Applicant
US5970430(A)	1999-10-01	Burns et al.	Applicant
US6014902(A)	2000-01-01	Lewis et al.	Applicant
US6016523(A)	2000-01-01	Zimmerman et al.	Applicant
US6016706(A)	2000-01-01	Yamamoto et al.	Applicant
US6017143(A)	2000-01-01	Eryurek et al.	Applicant
US6023399(A)	2000-02-01	Kogure	Applicant
US6038579(A)	2000-03-01	Sekine	Applicant
US6045260(A)	2000-04-01	Schwartz et al.	Applicant
US6047220(A)	2000-04-01	Eryurek et al.	Applicant
US6047222(A)	2000-04-01	Burns et al.	Applicant
US6052655(A)	2000-04-01	Kobayashi et al.	Applicant
US6061603(A)	2000-05-01	Papadopoulos et al.	Applicant
US6119047(A)	2000-09-01	Eryurek et al.	Applicant
US6119529(A)	2000-09-01	Di Marco et al.	Examiner
US6139180(A)	2000-10-01	Usher et al.	Applicant
US6182501(B1)	2001-02-01	Furuse et al.	Examiner
US6192281(B1)	2001-02-01	Brown et al.	Applicant
US6195591(B1)	2001-02-01	Nixon et al.	Applicant
US6199018(B1)	2001-03-01	Quist et al.	Applicant
US6236948(B1)	2001-05-01	Eck et al.	Examiner
US6263487(B1)	2001-07-01	Stripf et al.	Applicant
US6298377(B1)	2001-10-01	Hartikainen et al.	Applicant
US6307483(B1)	2001-10-01	Westfield	Applicant
US6317701(B1)	2001-11-01	Pyotsia et al.	Applicant
US6327914(B1)	2001-12-01	Dutton	Examiner
US6347252(B1)	2002-02-01	Behr et al.	Applicant
US6360277(B1)	2002-03-01	Ruckley et al.	Applicant
US6370448(B1)	2002-04-01	Eryurek	Applicant
US6377859(B1)	2002-04-01	Brown et al.	Applicant
US6397114(B1)	2002-05-01	Eryurek et al.	Applicant
US6405099(B1)	2002-06-01	Nagai et al.	Applicant
US6425038(B1)	2002-07-01	Sprecher	Applicant
US6473656(B1)	2002-10-01	Langels et al.	Applicant
US2002/0013629(A1)	2002-01-01	Nixon et al.	Applicant
DE3213866	1983-10-01		Applicant
DE3540204	1986-09-01		Applicant
DE4008560	1990-09-01		Applicant
DE4343747	1994-06-01		Applicant
DE4433593	1995-06-01		Applicant
DE19502499	1996-08-01		Applicant
DE29600609	1997-03-01		Applicant
DE19704694	1997-08-01		Applicant
DE19930660	1999-07-01		Applicant
DE19905071	2000-08-01		Applicant
DE29917651	2000-12-01		Applicant
DE10036971	2002-02-01		Applicant
EP122622	1984-10-01		Applicant
EP413814	1991-02-01		Applicant
EP487419	1992-05-01		Applicant
EP594227	1994-04-01		Applicant
EP624847	1994-11-01		Applicant
EP644470	1995-03-01		Applicant
EP825506	1997-07-01		Applicant
EP827096	1997-09-01		Applicant
EP838768	1997-09-01		Applicant
EP807804	1997-11-01		Applicant
EP1058093	1999-05-01		Applicant
EP1022626	2000-07-01		Applicant
FR2302514	1976-09-01		Applicant
FR2334827	1977-07-01		Applicant
GB928704	1963-06-01		Applicant
GB1534280	1978-11-01		Applicant
GB1534288	1978-11-01		Applicant
GB2310346	1997-08-01		Applicant
GB2347232	2000-01-01		Applicant
GB2342453	2000-04-01		Applicant
JP58-129316	1983-08-01		Applicant
JP59-116811	1984-07-01		Applicant
JP59163520	1984-09-01		Applicant
JP59-211196	1984-11-01		Applicant
JP59-211896	1984-11-01		Applicant
JP60000507	1985-01-01		Applicant
JP60-76619	1985-05-01		Applicant
JP60-131495	1985-07-01		Applicant
JP60174915	1985-09-01		Applicant
JP62-30915	1987-02-01		Applicant
JP64-1914	1989-01-01		Applicant
JP64001914	1989-01-01		Applicant
JP64-72699	1989-03-01		Applicant
JP2-5105	1990-01-01		Applicant
JP5-122768	1993-05-01		Applicant
JP6242192	1994-09-01		Applicant
JP7-63586	1995-03-01		Applicant
JP7234988	1995-09-01		Applicant
JP8-54923	1996-02-01		Applicant
JP8102241	1996-04-01		Applicant
JP8-136386	1996-05-01		Applicant
JP8-166309	1996-06-01		Applicant
JP8247076	1996-09-01		Applicant
JP8313466	1996-11-01		Applicant
JP2712625	1997-10-01		Applicant
JP2712701	1997-10-01		Applicant
JP2753592	1998-03-01		Applicant
JP7225530	1998-05-01		Applicant
JP10-232170	1998-09-01		Applicant
JP11083575	1999-03-01		Applicant
WO94/25933	1994-11-01		Applicant
WO96/11389	1996-04-01		Applicant
WO96/12993	1996-05-01		Applicant
WO96/39617	1996-12-01		Applicant
WO97/21157	1997-06-01		Applicant
WO97/25603	1997-07-01		Applicant
WO98/06024	1998-02-01		Applicant
WO98/13677	1998-04-01		Applicant
WO98/20469	1998-05-01		Applicant
WO98/39718	1998-09-01		Applicant
WO99/19782	1998-10-01		Applicant
WO/55700	2000-03-01		Applicant
WO/41050	2000-07-01		Applicant
WO/70531	2000-11-01		Applicant
WO1/77766	2001-10-01		Applicant
WO2/27418	2002-04-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (144)

International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US 02/14934, filed May 8, 2002, Search Report dated Apr. 28, 2002.Applicant
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US 02/14560, filed May 8, 2002, Search Report dated Sep. 3, 2002.Applicant
“Sensor and Device Diagnostics for Predictive and Proactive Maintenance”, by B. Boynton, A Paper Presented at the Electric Power Research Institute—Fossil Plant Maintenance Conference in Baltimore, Maryland, Jul. 29-Aug. 1, 1996, pp. 50-1—50-6.Applicant
“Smart Field Devices Provide New Process Data, Increase System Flexibility,” by Mark Boland, I&CS, Nov. 1994, pp. 45-51.Applicant
“Wavelet Analysis of Vibration, Part I: Theory,” by D.E. Newland, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 116, Oct. 1994, pp. 409-416.Applicant
“Wavelet Analysis of Vibration, Part 2: Wavelet Maps,” by D.E. Newland, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 116, Oct. 1994, p. 417-425.Applicant
“Field-based Architecture is Based on Open Systems, Improves Plant Performance”, by P. Cleaveland, I&CS, Aug. 1996, pp. 73-74.Applicant
“Fuzzy Logic and Neural Network Applications to Fault Diagnosis”, by P. Frank et al., International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, (1997), pp. 68-88.Applicant
“A Fault-Tolerant Interface for Self-Validating Sensors”, by M.P. Henry, Colloquium, pp. 3/1-3/2 (Nov. 1990).Applicant
“The Implications of Digital Communications on Sensor Validation”, by M. Henry et al., Report No. QUEL 1912/92, (1992).Applicant
“Keynote Paper: Hardware Compilation-A New Technique for Rapid Prototyping of Digital Systems-Applied to Sensor Validation”, by M.P. Henry, Control Eng. Practice, vol. 3, No. 7., pp. 907-924, (1995).Applicant
“Neural Networks for Sensor Validation and Plant Monitoring,” by B. Upadhyaya, International Fast Reactor Safety Meeting, Aug. 12-16, 1990, pp. 2-10.Applicant
“Intelligent Behaviour for Self-Validating Sensors”, by M.P. Henry, Advances in Measurement, pp. 1-7, (May 1990).Applicant
“Integration of Multiple Signal Validation Modules for Sensor Monitoring,”by B. Upadhyaya et al., Department of Nuclear Engineering, Jul. 8, 1990, pp. 1-6.Applicant
“An Integrated Architecture For Signal Validation in Power Plants,” by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., Third IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Aug. 24-26, 1988, pp. 1-6.Applicant
“Neural Networks for Sensor Validation and Plantwide Monitoring,” by E. Eryurek, 1992.Applicant
“Programmable Hardware Architecture for Sensor Validation”, by M.P. Henry et al., Control Eng. Practice, vol. 4, No. 10., pp. 1339-1354, (1996).Applicant
“Applications of Neural Computing Paradigms for Signal Validation,” by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., Department of Nuclear Science, vol. 37, No. 2, by E. Eryurek et al. Apr. 1990, pp. 1040-1047.Applicant
“Sensor Validation for Power Plants Using Adaptive Backpropagation Neural Network,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 37, No. 2, by E. Eryurek et al. Apr. 1990, pp. 1040-1047.Applicant
A Standard Interface for Self-Validating Sensors, by M.P. Henry et al., Report No. QUEL 1884/91, (1991).Applicant
“Development and Application of Neural Network Algorithms For Process Diagnostics,” by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Decision and Control, 1990, pp. 3277-3282.Applicant
“Fuzzy Logic and Artificial Neural Networks for Nuclear Power Plant Applications,” by R.C. Berkan et al., Proceedings of the American Power Conference.Applicant
Parallel, Fault-Tolerant Control and Diagnostics System for Feedwater Regulation in PWRS, by E. Eryurek et al., Proceedings of the American Power Conference.Applicant
“Signal Processing, Data Handling and Communications: The Case for Measurement Validation”, by M.P. Henry, Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University.Applicant
“Software-Based Fault-Tolerant Control Design for Improved Power Plant Operation,” IEEE/IFAC Joint Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design, Mar. 7-9, 1994 pp. 585-590.Applicant
“Using Artificial Neural Networks to Identify Nuclear Power Plant States,” by Israel E. Alguindigue et al., pp. 1-4.Applicant
“Taking Full Advantage of Smart Transmitter Technology Now,” by G. Orrison, Control Engineering, vol. 42, No. 1, Jan. 1995.Applicant
“Automated Generation of Nonlinear System Characterization for Sensor Failure Detection,” by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., ISA, 1989 pp. 269-274.Applicant
“Application of Neural Networks for Sensor Validation and Plant Monitoring,” by B. Upadhyaya et al., Nuclear Technology, vol. 97, No. 2, Feb. 1992 pp. 170-176.Applicant
“Detecting Blockage in Process Connections of Differential Pressure Transmitters”, by E. Taya et al., SICE, 1995, pp. 1605-1608.Applicant
09/169,873, Oct. 12, 1998, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/175,832, Oct. 19, 1998, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/257,896, Feb. 25, 1999, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/303,869, May 3, 1999, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/335,212, Jun. 17, 1999, Kirkpatrick et al.Applicant
09/360,473, Jul. 23, 1999, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/369,530, Aug. 6, 1999, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/384,876, Aug. 27, 1999, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/406,263, Sep. 24, 1999, Kirkpatrick et al.Applicant
09/409,098, Sep. 30, 1999, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/409,114, Sep. 30, 1999, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/565,604, May 4, 2000, Eruyrek et al.Applicant
09/576,450, May 23, 2000, Wehrs.Applicant
09/606,259, Jun. 29, 2000, Eryurek.Applicant
09/616,118, Jul. 14, 2000, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/627,543, Jul. 28, 2000, Eryurek et al.Applicant
“A TCP/IP Tuturial” by, Socolofsky et al., Spider Systems Limited, Jan. 1991 pp. 1-23.Applicant
“Approval Standards For Explosionproof Electrical Equipment General Requirements”, Factory Mutual Research, Cl. No. 3615, Mar. 1989, pp. 1-34.Applicant
“Approval Standard Intrinsically Safe Apparatus and Associated Apparatus For Use In Class I, II, and III, Division 1 Hazardous (Classified) Locations”, Factory Mutual Research, Cl. No. 3610, Oct. 1988, pp. 1-70.Applicant
“Automation On-Line” by, Phillips et al., Plant Services, Jul. 1997, pp. 41-45.Applicant
“Climb to New Heights by Controlling your PLCs Over the Internet” by, Phillips et al., Intech, Aug. 1998, pp. 50-51.Applicant
“CompProcessor For Piezoresistive Sensors” MCA Technologies Inc. (MCA7707), pp. 1-8.Applicant
“Ethernet emerges as viable, inexpensive fieldbus”, Paul G. Schreier, Personal Engineering, Dec. 1997, p. 23-29.Applicant
“Ethernet Rules Closed-loop System” by, Eidson et al., Intech, Jun. 1998, pp. 39-42.Applicant
“Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control System Part 2: Physical Layer Specification and Service Definition”, ISA-S50.02-1002, pp. 1-93.Applicant
“Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control Systems Part 3: Data Link Service Definition”, ISA-S50.02-1997, Part 3, Aug. 1997, pp. 1-159.Applicant
Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control Systems Part 4: Data Link Protocol Specification, ISA-S50.02-1997, Part 4, Aug. 1997, pp. 1-148.Applicant
“Fieldbus Support For Process Analysis” by, Blevins et al., Fisher-Rosemoung Systems, Inc., 1995, pp. 121-128.Applicant
“Fieldbus Technical Overview Understanding Foundation™ fieldbus technology”, Fisher-Rosemount, 1998, pp. 1-23.Applicant
“Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.0” by, Berners-Lee, et al., MIT/LCS, May 1996, pp. 1-54.Applicant
“Infranets, Intranets, and the Internet” by, Pradip Madan, Echelon Corp, Sensors, Mar. 1997, pp. 46-50.Applicant
“Internet Technology Adoption into Automation” by, Fondl e al., Automation Business, pp. 1-5.Applicant
“Internet Protocol Darpa Internet Program Protocol Specification” by, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, RFC 791, Sep. 1981, pp. 1-43.Applicant
“Introduction to Emit”, emWare, Inc., 1997, pp. 1-22.Applicant
“Introduction to the Internet Protocols” by, Charles L. Hedrick, Computer Science Facilities Group, Rutgers University, Oct. 3, 1988, pp. 1-97.Applicant
“Is There A Future For Ethernet in Industrial Control?”, Miclot et al., Plant Engineering, Oct. 1988, pp. 44-46, 48, 50.Applicant
LFM/SIMA Internet Remote Diagnostics Research Project Summary Report, Stanford University, Jan. 23, 1997, pp. 1-6.Applicant
“Managing Devices with the Web” by, Howard et al., Byte, Sep. 1997, pp. 45-64.Applicant
“Modular Microkernel Links GUI And Browser For Embedded Web Devices” by, Tom Williams, pp. 1-2.Applicant
“PC Software Gets Its Edge From Windows, Components, and the Internet”, Wayne Labs, I&CS, Mar. 1997, pp. 23-32.Applicant
Proceedings Sensor Expo, Aneheim, California, Produced by Expocon Managemnet Associates, Inc., Apr. 1996, pp. 9-21.Applicant
Proceedings Sensor Expo, Boston, Massachuttes, Produced by Expocon Management Associates, Inc., May 1997, pp. 1-416.Applicant
“Smart Sensor Network of the Future” by, Jay Warrior, Sensors, Mar. 1997, pp. 40-45.Applicant
“The Embedded Web Site” by, John R. Hines, IEEE Spectrum, Sep. 1996, p. 23.Applicant
“Transmission Control Protocol: Darpa Internet Program Protocol Specification” Information Sciences Institute, Sep. 1981, pp. 1-78.Applicant
“Advanced Engine Diagnostics Using Universal Process Modeling”, by P. O'Sullivan et al., Presented at the 1996 SAE Conference on Future Transportion Technology, pp. 1-9.Applicant
“On-Line Statistical Process Control for a Glass Tank Ingredient Scale,” by R.A. Weisman, IFAC real Time Programming, 1985, pp. 29-38.Applicant
“The Performance of Control Charts for Monitoring Process Variation,” by C. Lowry et al., Commun. Statis.—Simula., 1995, pp. 409-437.Applicant
“A Knowledge-Based Approach for Detection and Diagnosis of Out-of-Control Events in Manufacturing Processes,” by P. Love et al., IEEE, 1989, pp. 736-741.Applicant
“Advanced Engine Diagnostics Using Universal Process Modeling”, by P. O'Sullivan, Presented at the 1996 SAE Conference on Future Transportation Technology, pp. 1-9.Applicant
“Smart Temperature Measurement in the '90”, by T. Kerlin et al., C&I, (1990).Applicant
“In Situ Calibration of Nuclear Plant Platinum Resistance Thermometers Using Johnson Noise Methods,” EPRI, Jun. 1983.Applicant
“Johnson Noise Thermometer for High Radiation and High-Temperature Environments,” by L. Oakes et al., Fifth Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 1988, pp. 2-23.Applicant
“Development of a Resistance Thermometer For Use Up to 1600 °C”, by M.J. de Groot et al., CAL Lab, Jul./Aug. 1996, pp. 38-41.Applicant
“Survey, Applications, And Prospects of Johnson Noise Thermometry,” by T. Blalock et al., Electrical Engineering Department, 1981 pp. 2-11.Applicant
“Noise Thermometry for Industrial and Metrological Applications at KFA Julich,” by H. Brixy et al., 7th International Symposium on Temperature, 1992.Applicant
“Johnson Noise Power Thermometer and its Application in Process Temperature Measurement,” by T.V. Blalock et al., American Institute of Physics 1982, pp. 1249-1259.Applicant
“Tuned-Circuit Johnson Noise Thermometry,” by Michael Roberts et al., 7th Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 1990.Applicant
“Tuned-Circuit Johnson Noise Thermometry,” by Michael Roberts et al., 7th Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 1990.Applicant
“Development of a Long-Life, High-Reliability Remotely Operated Johnson Noise Thermometer,” by R.L. Shepard et al., ISA, 1991, pp. 77-84.Applicant
“Application of Johnson Noise Thermometry to Space Nuclear Reactors,” by M.J. Roberts et al., Presented at the 6th Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 9-12, 1989.Applicant
“A Decade of Progress in High Temperature Johnson Noise Thermometry,” by T.V. Blalock et al., American Institute of Physics, 1982 pp. 1219-1223.Applicant
“Detection of Hot Spots in Thin Metal Films Using an Ultra Sensitive Dual Channel Noise Measurement System,” by G.H. Massiha et al., Energy and Information Technologies in the Southeast, vol. 3 of 3, Apr. 1989, pp. 1310-1314.Applicant
“A New Method of Johnson Noise Thermometry”, by C.J. Borkowski et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 45, No. 2, (Feb. 1974) pp. 151-162.Applicant
“In-Situ Response Time Testing of Thermocouples”, ISA, by H.M. Hashemian et al., Paper No. 89-0056, pp. 587-593, (1989).Applicant
“Measurement of the Temperature Fluctuation in a Resistor Generating 1/F Fluctuation,” by S. Hashiguchi, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 22, No. 5, Part 2, May 1983, pp. L284-L286.Applicant
“Check of Semiconductor Thermal Resistance Elements by the Method of Noise Thermometry”, by A. B. Kisilevskii et al., Measurement Techniques, vol. 25, No. 3, Mar. 1982, New York, USA, pp. 244-246.Applicant
“Thermocouple Continuity Checker,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 1954 (Oct. 1977).Applicant
“A Self-Validating Thermocouple,” Janice C-Y et al., IEEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 239-253 (Mar. 1997).Applicant
Instrument Engineers' Handbook, Chapter IV entitled “Temperature Measurements,” by T.J. Claggett, pp. 266-333 (1982).Applicant
“emWare's Releases EMIT 3.0, Allowing Manufacturers to Internet and Network Enable Devices Royalty Free,” 3 pages, PR Newswire (Nov. 4, 1998).Applicant
Warrior, J., “The IEEE P1451.1 Object Model Network Independent Interfaces for Sensors and Actuators,” pp. 1-14, Rosemount Inc. (1997).Applicant
Warrior, J., “The Collision Between the Web and Plant Floor Automation,” 6th. WWW Conference Workshop on Embedded Web Technology, Santa Clara, CA (Apr. 7, 1997).Applicant
Microsoft Presss Computer Dictionary, 3rd Edition, p. 124.Applicant
“Internal Statistical Quality Control for Quality Monitoring Instruments”, by P. Girling et al., ISA, 15 pgs., 1999.Applicant
Web Pages from www.triant.com (3 pgs.).Applicant
“Statistical Process Control (Practice Guide Series Book)”, Instrument Society of America, 1995, pp. 1-58 and 169-204.Applicant
“Time-Frequency Analysis of Transient Pressure Signals for a Mechanical Heart Valve Cavitation Study,” ASAIO Journal, by Alex A. Yu et al., vol. 44, No. 5, pp. M475-M479, (Sep.-Oct. 1998).Applicant
“Transient Pressure Signals in Mechanical Heart Valve Caviation,” by Z.J. Wu et al., pp. M555-M561 (undated).Applicant
“Caviation in Pumps, Pipes, and Valves,” Process Engineering, by Dr. Ronald Young, pp. 47 and 49 (Jan. 1990).Applicant
“Quantification of Heart Valve Cavitation Based on High Fidelity Pressure Measurements,” Advances in Bioengineering 1994, by Laura A. Garrison et al., Bed-vol. 28, pp. 297-298 (Nov. 6-11, 1994).Applicant
“Monitoring and Diagnosis of Cavitation in Pumps and Valves Using the Wigner Distribution,” Hydroaccoustic Facilities, Instrumentation, and Experimental Techniques, NCA-vol. 10, pp. 31-36 (1991).Applicant
“Developing Predictive Models for Cavitation Erosion,” Codes and Standards in A Global Environment, PVP-vol. 259, pp. 189-192 (1993).Applicant
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration”, Nov. 7, 2002, (PCT/US02/06606).Applicant
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration”, Jan. 3, 2003, (PCT/US02/30465).Applicant
“Self-Diagnosing Intelligent Motors: A Key Enabler for Next Generation, Manufacturing System,” by Fred M. Discenzo et al., pp. 3/1-3/4 (1999).Applicant
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration” for PCT/US01/40791.Applicant
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration” for PCT/US01/40782.Applicant
“Improving Dynamic Performance of Temperature Sensors With Fuzzy Control Techniques,” by Wang Lei et al., pp. 872-873 (1992).Applicant
“Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary” 2nd Edition, 1994, Microsoft Press, p. 156.Applicant
09/855,179, May 14, 2001, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/852,102, May 9, 2001, Eryurek et al.Applicant
09/576,719, May 23, 2000, Coursolle et al.Applicant
09/799,824, Mar. 5, 2001, Rome et al.Applicant
“A Microcomputer-Based Instrument for Applications in Platinum Resistance Thermomety,” by H. Rosemary Taylor and Hector A. Navarro, Journal of Physics E. Scientific Instrument, vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 1100-1104 (1983).Applicant
“Experience in Using Estelle for the Specification and Verification of a Fieldbus Protocol: FIP,” by Barretto et al., Computer Networking, pp. 295-304 (1990).Applicant
“Computer Simulation of H1 Field Bus Transmission,” by Utsumi et al., Advances in Instrumentation and Control, vol. 46, Part 2, pp. 1815-1827 (1991).Applicant
“Progress in Fieldbus Developments for Measuring and Control Application,” by A. Schwaier, Sensor and Acuators, pp. 115-119 (1991).Applicant
“Ein Emulationssystem zur Leistungsanalyse von Feldbussystemen, Teil 1,” by R. Hoyer, pp. 335-336 (1991).Applicant
“Simulatore Integrato: Controllo su bus di campo,” by Barabino et al., Automazione e Strumentazione, pp. 85-91 (Oct. 1993).Applicant
“Ein Modulares, verteiltes Diagnose-Expertensystem für die Fehlerdiagnose in lokalen Netzen,” by Jürgen M. Schröder, pp. 557-565 (1990).Applicant
“Fault Diagnosis of Fieldbus Systems,” by Jürgen Quade, pp. 577-581 (Oct. 1992).Applicant
“Ziele und Anwendungen von Feldbussystem,” by T. Pfeifer et al., pp. 549-557 (Oct. 1987).Applicant
“PROFIBUS-Infrastrukturmaβnahmen,” by Tilo Pfeifer et al., pp. 416-419 (Aug. 1991).Applicant
“Simulation des Zeitverhaltens von Feldbussystemen,” by O. Schnelle, pp. 440-442 (1991).Applicant
“Modélisation et simulation d'un bus de terrain: FIP,” by Song et al, pp. 5-9 (undated).Applicant
“Feldbusnetz für Automatisierungssysteme mit intelligenten Funktionseinheiten,” by W. Kriesel et al., pp. 486-489 (1987).Applicant
“Bus de campo para la inteconexión del proceso con sistemas digitales de control,” Tecnologia, pp. 141-147 (1990).Applicant
“Dezentrale Installation mit Echtzeit-Feldbus,” Netzwerke, Jg. Nr.3 v. 14.3, 4 pp. (1990).Applicant
“Process Measurement and Analysis,” by Liptak et al., Instrument Engineers' Handbook, Third Edition, pp. 528-530, (1995).Applicant
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 34, No. 5, Sep. 1998, “Optical Design of the Coils of an Electromagnetic Flow Meter,” pp. 2563-2566.Applicant
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 30, No. 2, Mar. 1994, “Magnetic Fluid Flow Meter for Gases,” pp. 936-938.Applicant
IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement, “New approach to a main error estimation for primary transducer of electromagnetic flow meter,” pp. 1093-1097.Applicant
“Additional Information From Flowmeters via Signal Analysis,” by J.E. Amadi-Echendu and E.H. Higham, pp. 187-193.Applicant

Abstract