US 6,615,092 B2Grant
Method, system and facility for controlling resource allocation within a manufacturing environment
Issue Date:2003-09-02
•29 Claims
•6 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A method, a system and a facility provide for the control of resource allocation within a build to order manufacturing environment. A system for providing a control center for a manufacturing facility is disclosed. The system includes a plurality of information sources operably associated with manufacturing products within the manufacturing facility. A user interface of the system displays selective information associated with portions of the manufacturing facility within a control center operable to manage production within the manufacturing facility. The system further includes a resource allocator operably coupled to the control center and the plurality of information sources and the resource allocator is operable to monitor work in process within the manufacturing facility.
Metadata
Assignee
- Dell Products L.P.
Inventors
- Branden Clark Bickley
- Mark Allen Pape
- Richard M. Williams
- Nicholas J. Widis
- Brian J. Hunt
Application Information
Application Number:US 09/800,046
Filing Date:2001-03-05
Priority Date:2001-03-05
Art Unit:7
Classifications
IPC:
G06F 700G06F 1900
Field of Search:
700 96700226705 8
Patent Drawings (6 sheets)
Description
Technical Field
[0002] The present disclosure generally relates to manufacturing and, more particular to a method, system and facility for controlling resource allocation within a manufacturing environment.
Background of the Disclosure
[0003] Many years ago, manufacturers learned that, when building sufficiently large quantities of identical products, assembly lines could be used to increase the rate of production and decrease the per-unit production costs. In an assembly line, the assembly process is divided in a series of processing steps through which the work-in-process moves to result in the end product. These steps may be optimized, and once the manufacturing system becomes operational it will build a number of products with the same configuration using the optimized steps.
[0004] Assembly lines are typically used in a build-to-stock production model, where large quantities of identical products are manufactured in anticipation of forecasted demand. The manufactured products are then warehoused until that demand is realized. Build-to-stock manufacturing systems are therefore primarily suited to markets in which manufacturers can accurately predict customer demand.
[0005] In many markets, however, predicting customer demand is risky, at best. For example, in the market for computer systems and related items, technological improvements are realized so frequently and component prices change so rapidly that it is difficult to accurately predict how large the market for any particular product will ultimately be. As a result, when manufacturers in industries like information technology utilize the build-to-stock model, those manufacturers frequently find themselves with stocks of manufactured goods that are difficult or impossible to market at a profit (i.e., with stale inventory).
[0006] A contrasting model of production that helps manufacturers avoid the stale-inventory problem is the build-to-order model. According to the build-to-order model, each product is assembled only after a customer has ordered that particular product. One of the disadvantages traditionally associated with the build-to-order model, however, is that more time is required to fill orders, in that products must be manufactured, not simply taken from stock. Another disadvantage is that build-to-order manufacturing systems are typically less efficient than build-to-stock manufacturing systems, which drives up the cost of products that are built to order. Accordingly, build-to-order systems have typically been utilized in markets for luxury items, such as tailored clothing, and markets in which a paucity of manufacturers leaves consumers with little choice but to bear the high prices and delays that are generally passed down by build-to-order manufacturers.
[0007] Some manufacturers have attempted to minimize the delays associated with the build-to-order model by maintaining a significant inventory of the materials required for production (e.g., the components that are assembled to create the finished goods). Simply carrying such an inventory, however, imposes costs on manufacturers, including the costs associated with warehousing the material. Furthermore, in markets where product innovations occur rapidly, such material oftentimes become stale.
[0008] For example, in contemporary times, the market for computer systems (including, without limitation, mini-computers, mainframe computers, personal computers, servers, work stations, portables, hand held systems, and other data processing systems) has been marked by high and increasing rates of product innovation. Further, to manufacture, for example, a typical personal computer, many different components are required, including a processor, memory, additional data storage (such as a hard disk drive), a number of peripheral devices that provide input and output (I/O) for the system, and adapter cards (such as video or sound cards) for communicating with the peripheral devices. Each of those components is also typically available in many different variations. In such markets, even if using the build-to-order model, manufacturers risk significant losses when carrying significant inventories of material.
[0009] Also, it is difficult to optimize build-to-order manufacturing facilities in terms of labor requirements and space requirements, as such facilities must be able to produce of a wide variety of products. However, in markets where many manufacturers are competing for customers, such as the computer system market, any reduction in production costs that does not decrease product quality is an important improvement.
[0010] Among the cost-saving measures that a producer may employ is to follow the direct-ship model, in which the manufacturer avoids middlemen such as distributors and retailers by accepting orders directly from and shipping products directly to customers. However, additional costs are borne by a manufacturer that provides a direct-ship option, in that the manufacturer must provide distribution facilities, in addition to providing the manufacturing facilities.
Summary of the Disclosure
[0011] In accordance with teachings of the present disclosure, a method, system and facility are described for controlling resource allocation within a manufacturing environment. According to one aspect, a manufacturing facility employing dynamic allocation of resources for assembling and shipping computer based systems is disclosed. The facility includes a centralized information system communicatively coupled with selective portions of the manufacturing facility and operable to aggregate information associated with manufacturing computer systems. The facility further includes a work in process (WIP) profile associated with the selective portions of the facility and operable to provide information in substantially real-time to the centralized information system. The facility further includes at least one user interface displayed within a control center of the manufacturing facility and operable to enable allocation of resources within the selective portions of the manufacturing facility.
[0012] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a system for providing a control center for a manufacturing facility is disclosed. The system includes a plurality of information sources operably associated with manufacturing products within the manufacturing facility. A user interface of the system displays selective information associated with portions of the manufacturing facility within a control center operable to manage production within the manufacturing facility. The system further includes a resource allocator operably coupled to the control center and the plurality of information sources and the resource allocator is operable to monitor work in process within the manufacturing facility.
[0013] According to a further aspect of the present disclosure, a method for controlling allocation of resources within a manufacturing facility is disclosed. The method includes determining a WIP profile associated with one or more areas within the manufacturing facility and accessing one or more databases to provide an aggregated information source to be displayed within a user interface of a control center. The method further includes determining available capacity based on shipping and scheduling information for the manufacturing facility and identifying an order release criteria limiting shipment of an order, the limiting associated with the WIP profile.
[0014] The present disclosure relates to a manufacturing facility that provides build-to-order products and direct shipment of products to customers. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to a manufacturing facility that is constructed and operated in such a manner as to enjoy numerous benefits, relative to prior art manufacturing facilities, including the benefit of reduced production costs. In addition, the present disclosure relates to systems and methods that may be utilized to advantage in a distribution facility, independent of the manufacturing process.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0015] A more complete understanding of the present embodiments and advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:
[0016] FIG. 1 illustrates a manufacturing facility in accordance with teachings of the present disclosure;
[0017] FIG. 2 illustrates a detailed layout of a manufacturing facility in accordance with teachings of the present disclosure;
[0018] FIG. 3 illustrates a centralized information system for use with a manufacturing facility in accordance with teachings of the present disclosure;
[0019] FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for managing resources within a manufacturing facility;
[0020] FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for allocating resources using a remote monitor and simulator in accordance with teachings of the present disclosure; and
[0021] FIG. 6 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for pulling product through a manufacturing facility based on capacity availability of a carrier and WIP profiles of the manufacturing facility in accordance with teachings of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description of the Disclosure
[0022] Preferred embodiments and their advantages are best understood by reference to FIGS. 1 through 6, wherein like numbers are used to indicate like and corresponding parts. Referring to FIG. 1, there is depicted an exemplary manufacturing facility 100 according to the present disclosure. In the illustrative embodiment, manufacturing facility 100 is used to manufacture computers, which are shipped directly to customers, along with associated articles (such as monitors, speakers, printers, etc). Manufacturing facility 100 is operated according to a new process and includes significant architectural enhancements, new hardware, and new control logic that provides increased quality and efficiency.
[0023] During production, the manufacturer receives one or more customer orders from a business unit and orders components from suppliers needed to manufacture the products for those orders and articles and packaging (such as boxes and protective inserts) needed to fill the orders. Preferably, to minimize the inventory carried in manufacturing facility 100, few if any components, articles, and packaging will be left over from previous production runs. Therefore, at the beginning of each production run, most or all of components 103, articles 112, and packages 111 for the orders in that run will be ordered from suppliers. Production runs may nevertheless overlap to some degree, in that the manufacturer need not IL wait until the last item for one run is shipped before ordering components for the next production run from suppliers.
[0024] Manufacturing facility 100 receives ordered components 103, articles 112, and packages 111 via assembly unit 101 in one region and a shipping unit 106 in another region (illustrated near the upper end of FIG. 1). Product components 103 are received in assembly unit 101 via docks in a first portion of the left wall of manufacturing facility 100. By contrast, packages 111 for assembled products enter assembly unit 101 through the lower portion of the right wall of manufacturing facility 100.
[0025] Manufacturing facility 100 may also receive products (e.g., computers) that were assembled at other facilities and delivered to manufacturing facility 100 to fill an order. Preferably, external products 113 are received into shipping unit 106, via docks in the second portion of left wall of left of manufacturing facility 100 as are ordered articles 112. Preferably, however, the receiving docks (not expressly shown) for ordered articles 112 are disposed between the docks for external products 113 and the docks for components 103, and articles 112 are temporarily stored in an article-staging area 107 at the lower edge of shipping unit 106 near assembly unit 101.
[0026] Once sufficient components 103 have been received, assembly unit 101 begins assembling components 103 into computers systems. Specifically, components 103 are kitted in a kitting facility 102, and the component kits are transported to a build facility 104 for assembly and configuration. Once assembled and configured, each product such as a computer system is transported to a boxing facility 105, where the product is packaged and a tracking label is applied to the packaged product. The finished products are then transported to shipping unit 106 via transport 116.
[0027] As illustrated in FIG. 1, each area within manufacturing facility 100 includes a Work-in-Process (“WIP”) profile for identifying the volume and throughput of product within a specific area of manufacturing facility 100. For example, kitting facility 102 includes an associated kitting WIP profile 102a;build facility 104 includes an associated build facility WIP profile 104a;boxing or packaging facility 105 includes an associated boxing or packaging facility WIP profile 105a.In a similar manner, each area within shipping unit 106 includes associated WIP profiles. Manufacturing facility 100 further includes associated monitoring and control hardware and software for accessing, controlling and communicating WIP profiles within each area of manufacturing facility 100. For example, as product or units transported throughout manufacturing facility 100, each unit may be scanned into and out of each area using an optical scanner and bar code to identify when product enters and/or leaves an area within manufacturing facility 100. A WIP profile for each area and associated logs, databases, etc. may be automatically updated for specific units as they progress through manufacturing facility 100. In this manner, a control center (not expressly shown) may employ one or more software programs to access WIP profiles for aggregating information related to manufacturing thereby allowing effecting management of resources within manufacturing facility 100.
[0028] For example, shipping unit 106 utilizes a shipping system (i.e., the equipment in shipping unit 106 and the related software) which receives each finished product from the assembly unit (as well as external products) and automatically determines whether the corresponding order is fillable (i.e., whether all items in the order, including products and associated articles, are available for shipping). The shipping system also automatically determines whether each fillable order is shippable (i.e., whether there is a suitable carrier vehicle or shipping container present with available capacity to receive the items in the order). These automatic determination are made with reference to databases including WIP profiles that reflect the current state of the production environment. A control center may access the database or databases to identify which products are ready for shipment, which articles have been received, which carrier vehicles are present, and how much capacity those vehicles have available.
[0029] In the illustrative embodiment, shipping unit 106 includes a receiving scanner 117, which monitors a transport 116 that brings products from assembly unit 101 into shipping unit 106. As each product passes by receiving scanner 117, receiving scanner 117 reads a barcode on that product's tracking label, updates one or more databases to reflect the detected location of the scanned product, and triggers the automatic process for determining whether to release an order (i.e., whether to transport the items in the order to outgoing docks).
[0030] If the shipping system determines that an order is not fillable or not shippable, the shipping system automatically stores the products received for that order in automated storage and retrieval system (ASRS) 108. When it is determined that an order is fillable and shippable, the shipping system automatically updates the status of the order in one or more databases to flag the order as having been released and automatically conveys the ordered items to a parcel unit 110 for tendering to parcel carriers (for small orders) or to a less-than-trailer-load (LTL) unit 109 to be loaded onto pallets and then tendered to LTL carriers (for larger orders), as described in greater detail below.
[0031] As illustrated, products flow out of the LTL unit 109 through docks in an upper portion of right wall of manufacturing facility 100 and products flow out of parcel unit 110 through docks in the upper wall of manufacturing facility 100. Docks for outgoing items and docks for incoming material are thus distributed along the perimeter of the manufacturing facility according to a particular pattern that provides for increased material input and shipping output. Carriers face less traffic congestion when traveling to and positioning themselves at incoming and outgoing docks. A greater number of carrier vehicles can therefore be accommodated at one time, compared to prior art facilities. This improvement helps make it possible for the manufacturer support increased production levels and to provide customers with products in a timely manner while utilizing the just-in-time approach to procuring material. Further, the logistical advantages are provided with requiring an increase in the amount of space required to house manufacturing facility 100. The positioning of the docks also minimizes the amount of material movement required within manufacturing facility 100 and, in conjunction with the internal layout, provides for a work flow that is conducive to rapid production and space efficiency.
[0032] When an order is released, if products for that order are stored in ASRS 108, the shipping system will preferably automatically discharge those products from ASRS 108 (i.e., direct ASRS 108 to move the products from internal storage to distribution conveyor 116). After the order is released, shipping labels are also applied to the ordered products. Specifically, products from ASRS 108 and products coming directly from the external product docks and directly from assembly unit 101 are all transported through labeling stations (not expressly shown) for products on the way to LTL unit 109 or parcel unit 110. Moreover, the shipping labels for the assembled products are printed and applied in an area of manufacturing facility 100 that is separate from the area in which labels are printed for and applied to articles. For example, product shipping-label printers may be located in a central region of shipping unit 106, while the article-labeling stations may be located in article staging area 107 of shipping unit 106, adjacent to assembly unit 101.
[0033] Referring now to FIG. 2, a detailed illustration of a manufacturing facility is shown. The manufacturing facility illustrated in FIG. 2 is similar to manufacturing facility 100 of FIG. 1 and includes hardware and software for providing a control center for controlling allocation of resources within the manufacturing facility. A manufacturing facility, illustrated generally at 200, includes an incoming articles area 201 for receiving articles, components, etc. for assembling computer systems. Incoming components are staged for assembly within one of a plurality of kitting units 202, 203, 204, and 205. Operators within each kitting unit place associated hardware within a bin (not expressly shown) which is forwarded to a build facility 207 for assembling the components into computer systems. Product is automatically transported to one of the production lines 206a,206b,206c,206d,via transport 206. Build facility 207 includes build area 207a,207b,207c,207dand are associated with each production line 206a,206b,206c, 206d. Each build area includes four associated work cells providing operators facilities and equipment for assembling computer systems using the components within each transported kit.
[0034] Each transport for an associated production line 206a, 206b,206c,and 206dis a multi-tiered transport system that includes several vertically displaced transport levels for transporting assembly kits to associated build cells within build facility 207. Each transport is distributively coupled to boxing facility 208 including plural boxing areas 208a,208b,208cand 208dfor packaging assembled systems for shipping. Upon packaging the assembled products, each box is preferreably transferred to shipping where associated items from SPAM (speaker, printer, advanced port replicators, monitors) unit 209 may be joined via a transport system (not expressly shown). Within SPAM unit 209, additional hardware such as speakers, printers, monitors, etc. are included with each packaged product.
[0035] Packaged products may be transported to either LTL unit 214, parcel shipping 217 or ASRS 211 depending on an order fill requirement or criteria for the associated produced product. For example, if an order has been filled and is to be shipped via an available LTL carrier, the completed product will be forwarded to one of the pallet areas 215a,215b,215c,or 216dfor palletizing and subsequent shipping via an LTL carrier. In another embodiment, an order may be forwarded to parcel shipping area 217 for shipping orders to customers which may not require LTL carrier type transportation of product.
[0036] ASRS 211 provides temporary storage for assembled products until orders are filled for shipping and an order shipping criteria is met. ASRS 211 distributes products among several rows of shelves vertically displaced within ASRS 211 using first and second ASRS transports 212, 213 and a handler displaced within each row of ASRS 211. Each handler selectively places and removes packaged products within ASRS 211 based on shipping criteria and/or order fulfillment criteria for each stored/retrieved package. Each handler stores and retrieves packages based on the order fulfillment criteria and receives or places the packages on ASRS transports 212 and 213 accordingly. The products are then forwarded to LTL Unit 214 or parcel shipping 217 where the order is delivered to an appropriate customer.
[0037] In one embodiment, one or more products may be transferred from another facility to fill an order. For example, a product may be received via incoming parcel 210 and transferred to one of the units within manufacturing facility 200. Incoming parcel 210 may provide a completed product which may be stored within ASRS 211 until an order is complete or used to fill an order for shipping directly to a customer via LTL unit 214. As such, a package received via incoming parcel 210 may be automatically transferred to LTL unit 214, parcel shipping 217, or ASRS 211 based on an order fulfillment criteria for the completed product.
[0038] Similar to FIG. 1, each area within the manufacturing facility 200 includes a work-in-process (WIP) profile for each area. For example, boxing facility 208 may include a volume of products in the process of being boxed or staged to be boxed. Boxing facility includes a WIP profile having a capacity and throughput level for each boxing area 208a,208b,208c,208dbased on the number of products within and processed through each area. As such, a granular WIP profile may be acquired for each area within boxing facility 208.
[0039] In a preferred embodiment, real-time acquisition of WIP profiles advantageously allow a control center for manufacturing facility 200 with access to information relating to the dynamically changing environment within manufacturing facility 200. For example, one or more pieces of equipment within boxing facility 208 may malfunction during operation and may be inoperable for a undeterminable time period. As such, a WIP profile for boxing area 208 may be accessed to determine the maximum throughput of boxing facility 208, and resources within build facility 207 and kitting 206 may be reallocated without overburdening boxing 208 and causing a bottleneck during production. In a similar manner, if one or more pieces of equipment malfunction in boxing area 208a, the control center may automatically re-route product from build facility 202 to boxing area 208b,208cand/or 208d.
[0040] In one embodiment, WIP profiles for each area within manufacturing facility 200 may be used to pull product through manufacturing facility based on the availability of a carrier or available capacity for an incoming carrier. For example, an LTL carrier may schedule shipment of orders using the WIP profiles of production areas within manufacturing facility 200. Such product may be pulled through appropriate areas based on the scheduled availability of the carrier thereby increasing the overall flow of product through the manufacturing facility and subsequently to a carrier. In this manner, portions of an order may be stored throughout manufacturing facility 200 until a carrier is available to transport the product to a customer, thereby increasing the relative throughput of products through manufacturing facility 200 while minimizing inventory of products. Additionally, resources may be dynamically allocated to fill the order in real-time based on WIP profiles within manufacturing facility 200.
[0041] FIG. 3 illustrates a centralized information system for controlling allocation of resources within a manufacturing facility. A control center, illustrated generally at 300, includes an information system 301 that may include even more computer systems, servers, terminals, etc. communicatively coupled to one or more of business units 302, an order management source 303, an outbound carrier(s) source 304, an inbound carrier(s) source 305, a first manufacturing facility 306 and/or second manufacturing facility 318. Each manufacturing facility may include access to several production areas within each facility for producing products such as computer systems. For example, first manufacturing facility 306 may include a kitting area 307, a build area 308, a boxing area 309, an LTL area 310, an ASRS area 311, an incoming parcel area 312, a SPAM area 313, an outbound parcel 314, an incoming LTL carriers 315, outbound LTL carriers 316, and an articles area 317.
[0042] Control center 300 advantageously provides access to each information source through aggregating selective information 323 and communicating the selective information via interface 324 to create one or more sessions for efficiently managing production within a manufacturing facility. For example, a session A 319 may include a user interface for monitoring WIP profiles within a manufacturing facility and allocating resources based on WIP profiles for each area. Session B 320 may be used to access information relating to production and dock door scheduling. Session C 321 may be used for identifying and tracking equipment errors for equipment within each part of the facility. Additionally, Session D 322 may include a user interface for identifying and recovering from process errors that may occur within the manufacturing facility. Though illustrated as separate sessions, each session may be integrated with each other or may be provided within separate user interfaces using separate monitors centrally localized to create a control center for managing a manufacturing facility.
[0043] Through aggregating information for one or more sources, either internal or external to a manufacturing facility, dynamic allocation of resources within the manufacturing facility can be managed using centralized information system 301. For example, manufacturing facility 306 may include a WIP profile for ASRS area 311 which includes information relating to products stored within ASRS 311 for filling an order managed by order management source 303. As such, order management source 303 may determine when an order ship criteria has been fulfilled using the WIP profile associated with ASRS 311 and release an order upon an inbound carrier being available. In this manner, centralized information system 301 may provide a user interface for a user within a session such as session A 319 allowing a user to make decisions for allocating resources to ship products.
[0044] In another embodiment, one or more business units 302 may request orders based on a WIP profile for one or more areas within first and/or second manufacturing facility 306, 318. For example, incoming parcel 312 may include several products shipped from second manufacturing facility 318 to first manufacturing facility 306. One of the business units 302 may request additional products for an order and incoming parcel 312 may receive one or more of the requested products. As such, centralized information system 301 may aggregate information relating to the request and provide a user of system 301 WIP profile and scheduling information for filling the updated order. In this manner, resources for producing, scheduling, storing, transporting, etc. for a manufacturing facility may be dynamically allocated to fill each order based on WIP profiles associated with portions of the manufacturing facility.
[0045] In another embodiment, information system 301 may be used to identify process errors occurring within a manufacturing facility allowing a user of system 301 to re-allocate resources and expedite resolving issues for the problematic process. For example, a burn-in process may be causing errors for a particular product and not for another product being manufactured. As such, the problematic process may be identified by information system 301 and a user interface may be updated to identify the problem in real-time. As such, a user of control center 300 may re-route products and/or resources to another portion of the manufacturing facility to minimize the impact on production caused by the burn-in process.
[0046] FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for managing resources within a manufacturing facility. The method begins generally at step 400. At step 401, the method accesses one or more databases associate with manufacturing products and translates 402 information representative of a real-time manufacturing environment into a user interface 403 displayable within a monitor located within a control center for the manufacturing facility. One or more user interfaces may be displayed on one or more monitors within the control center and may include a production and dock door scheduling user interface, a WIP profile and resource allocation user interface, a process error and recovery user interface, an equipment error identification and recovery user interface, a simulation user interface, or other user interfaces which may be centrally located with a control center.
[0047] Upon displaying a user interface, the method proceeds to provide real-time updates 404 for each user interface 405 through accessing one or more networks operable to provide real-time updates to data logs or databases representing changes within the manufacturing environment. For example, a problem may occur with one or more products for an order which was produced in a particular build cell of the manufacturing facility. However, several other products for the same order may not encounter such quality issues. As such, the satifactory products may be packaged and forwarded to ASRS and stored while the products with problem(s) are held until the problem is resolved. Such a situation may provide a challenge for resources which have been allocated for filling an order. For example, a particular LTL carrier may have been scheduled to ship the completed order to a destination. With a portion of the order being held, the LTL carrier may not be able to meet the deadline. The method would determine if resources should be reallocated 407 and allow a user to access one or more areas having WIP profiles for similar product within the manufacturing facility and reallocate resources 408 within the facility so that the LTL carrier will not have to wait and the deadline will be met. The change in resource allocation may be updated within an appropriate database 409 and the method would update the user interface 404 accordingly.
[0048] In another embodiment, an LTL carrier which may be incoming to the manufacturing facility may have additional space for transporting products. As such, the control center may be able to access orders and resources 407 associated with products being manufactured within the manufacturing facility and pull product based on WIP to fill an order for the carrier thereby making efficient use of the additional space within the particular carrier and resources and/or product within the manufacturing facility.
[0049] FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for allocating resources using a remote monitor and simulator. The method begins generally at step 500 and may be used by a product such as the system illustrated in FIG. 3 or other systems operable to employ the method of FIG. 5. Additionally, the method may be embodied within a program of instructions such as a computer readable medium or within other mediums such as encoded logic firmware, or hardware operable to employ the method of FIG. 5.
[0050] At step 501 the method accesses one or more databases associated with a manufacturing facility and communicates the information 502 to a control center operable to display a control system 503 including a remote system monitor of resources within a manufacturing facility. In one embodiment, the remote monitoring system includes a graphical illustration of each piece of equipment within the manufacturing facility and an associated status log for the equipment. For example, the user interface may display if a piece of equipment is fully functional or if the equipment is inoperable. Other embodiments may include determining the throughput for a piece of equipment and/or determining an item being processed by a piece of equipment. For example, one or more logs or databases may be maintained for the piece of equipment thereby allowing the remote system to monitor activities associated with each piece of equipment.
[0051] Upon updating a user interface using real time acquisition of information 504 and updating a display 505 within the control center, the method proceeds to step 506 where the method detects a process or equipment error. If no errors are detected, the method proceeds to step 504 and repeats. If an error is detected, the method updates the remote monitoring system and alerts users 507 within the control center of the updated status.
[0052] For example, a visual indication on a user interface may be displayed and may include sending a page to one or more individuals alerting them of the altered status for the equipment or process. The method then proceeds to step 508 where the method determines if resources should be reallocated. If a simulation is not run, a user may reallocate resources 516 within the manufacturing facility. If a simulation of resource allocation is selected, the method proceeds to step 509 where information within selective areas of the manufacturing facility are acquired. For example, the method may determine availability of resources within another portion of the factory by accessing a WIP profile for each area within the factory. The simulator may then take the current volume scheduled for the inoperable section of the factory and schedule all or portions of the work load to one or more areas within the factory. For example, a particular area may have the capacity to output additional units prior to reaching full capacity. As such, the simulator may determine the available capacity for one or more areas within the factory and simulate routing portions or all of the workload to the available resources 510. The simulator may attempt several iterations 511 until an optimized re-allocation of resources is determined and display the results 512 within a user interface of the control center. Upon determining an optimized model, a user within the control center may accept or decline the simulation 513 and the method proceeds to step 514 where the method updates and deploys the determined scenario.
[0053] For example, if piece of equipment within one of the build cells 207aof FIG. 2 became inoperable and rendered build cell 207ainoperable, the method may determine that a build cell within another portion of build facility 207 may be able to handle the workload. As such, the control center may re-route kits coming from one or more kitting facilitates using transport 206 until the problem with build cell 207ais resolved. In this manner, real-time access to resources within the manufacturing facility may be accessed via a remote monitoring system and a simulation may determine allocating available resources within the manufacturing facility thereby allowing dynamic allocation of resources based on a current WIP profiles associated with each area within the manufacturing facility.
[0054] Referring now to FIG. 6, a flow diagram of a method for pulling product through a manufacturing facility based on capacity availability of a carrier and WIP profiles of the manufacturing facility is shown. The method begins generally at step 600. At step 601, a control center may be used to determine capacity and/or orders for a carrier 601 that may be inbound or proximal to a manufacturing facility. For example, a carrier may include additional capacity to ship products to a destination. Upon determining a carrier, a percent completion for an order for the carrier is determined 602 and resources for the order including WIP profiles and order fulfillment of products are also determined 603. The method then proceeds to step 604 where resources for the shipment are allocated in order to fulfill a ship criteria and the carrier is assigned to a dock door 605. The method then proceeds to step 606 where completed products may be retrieved from an ASRS and joined with other products that may be pulled through the manufacturing facility based on current levels of production within the manufacturing facility. Each product may be merged with other products being manufactured and/or retrieved from other locations within the facility and palletized if appropriate and routed to the assigned door for the carrier 606. The method then proceeds to step 607 where one or more database(s), logs, etc. may be updated to reflect the resources being allocated to fill the order. The method then repeats at step 601.
[0055] Although the disclosed embodiments have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made to the embodiments without departing from their spirit and scope.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A manufacturing facility employing dynamic allocation of resources for assembling and shipping products comprising:
a centralized information system that monitors respective work-in-process (WIP) profiles for build, packaging, and shipping facilities within the manufacturing facility;
wherein the respective WIP profiles for the build, packaging, and shipping facilities include information obtained in substantially real-time by the centralized information system;
wherein the WIP profile for the build facility identifies product volume within the build facility;
wherein the WIP profile for the packaging facility identifies product volume within the packaging facility;
wherein the WIP profile for the shipping facility identifies product volume within the shipping facility;
the centralized information system operable to display information from the respective WIP profiles for the build, packaging, and shipping facilities in a user interface in a control center for the manufacturing facility;
the centralized information system operable to receive user input specifying a desired reallocation of resources within one or more of the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility; and
the centralized information system operable to respond to the user input by automatically communicating with one or more of the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility to implement the desired reallocation of resources.
2. The manufacturing facility of claim 1 further comprising a process monitor operable to monitor a process activity associated with two or more of the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility.
3. The manufacturing facility of claim 2 wherein the process monitor determines process errors for one or more of the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility.
4. The manufacturing facility of claim 1 further comprising the control center operable to pull products associated with an order from the manufacturing facility for tender to a carrier associated with the order, based on shipping criteria associated with the order and based on WIP profiles for two or more of the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility.
5. The manufacturing facility of claim 4 further comprising the control center operable to optimize the manufacture of products based on a delivery capability of the carrier and a ship criteria of the order.
6. The manufacturing facility of claim 5 further comprising the control center operable to access an order request and allocate resources within the manufacturing facility to manufacture one or more systems based on the order request.
7. The manufacturing facility of claim 6 further comprising the control center operable to:
determine carrier availability and available carrier capacity;
to reallocate manufacturing resources within the build facility to process an order that can be shipped with the available carrier capacity of the available carrier;
to determine availability of a loading dock door; and
to allocate the loading dock door for the orders based on available resources within the shipping facility.
8. The manufacturing facility of claim 1 further comprising an automated storage and retrieval system (ASRS) associated with the control center and operable to retrieve product for an order based on ship criteria for the order, and based on availability of a carrier.
9. The facility of claim 1 further comprising the control center operable to reallocate resources based on available capacity for an incoming carrier.
10. A system for providing a control center for a manufacturing facility comprising:
a plurality of information sources operably associated with manufacturing products for a customer order within the manufacturing facility;
a work-in-process (WIP) profile monitor that maintains WIP profiles for build, packaging, and shipping facilities within the manufacturing facility, such that the WIP profiles include substantially real-time data that represents product volume within the build, packaging, and shipping facilities, respectively;
a user interface within a control center operable to manage production within the manufacturing facility, the user interface operable to display information from the WIP profiles for the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility;
the user interface operable to receive user input that specifies a desired reallocation of resources within one or more of the build facility, the packaging facility; and the shipping facility; and
a resource allocator operably coupled to the control center, that automatically communicates with one or more of the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility to implement the desired reallocation of resources.
11. The system of claim 10 further comprising a dock and scheduling user interface displayed within the control center, wherein the dock and scheduling user interface facilitates reallocation of resources for an order based on a ship criteria for the order and carrier information for the order.
12. The system of claim 10 further comprising a WIP profile monitor and resource allocation user interface displayed within the control center.
13. The system of claim 10 further comprising:
a process error and identification user interface displayed within the control center; and
an equipment error ID and recovery user interface displayed within the control center.
14. The system of claim 10 further comprising at least one database operable to provide real-time access to information associated with manufacturing a computer system.
15. The system of claim 10 wherein the system provides access to information associated one or more carriers, the information including capacity of the carrier.
16. The system of claim 10 further comprising control logic operable to allocate resources based on a ship criteria and carrier information associated with an order.
17. The system of claim 16 further comprising control logic operable to:
identify an unavailable resource within the manufacturing facility;
determining available capacity at a substitute resource for the unavailable resource within the manufacturing facility; -and
route products to the substitute resource.
18. A method for controlling allocation of resources within a build to order manufacturing facility comprising:
monitoring a work-in-process (WIP) profile for a build facility within the manufacturing facility, wherein the WIP profile for the build facility includes substantially real-time data that represents product volume within the build facility;
monitoring a WIP profile for a packaging facility within the manufacturing facility, wherein the WIP profile for the packaging facility includes substantially real-time data that represents product volume within the packaging facility;
monitoring a WIP profile for a shipping facility within the manufacturing facility, wherein the WIP profile for the shipping facility includes substantially real-time data that represents product volume within the shipping facility;
displaying information from the WIP profiles for the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility on a user interface of a control center for the manufacturing facility;
after displaying information from the WIP profiles for the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility in the control center, receiving user input that specifies a desired reallocation of resources within one or more of the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility; and
in response to receiving the user input, automatically communicating with one or more of the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility to implement the desired reallocation of resources.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein:
the operation of displaying information from the WIP profiles comprises displaying information that pertains to a bottleneck restricting completion and shipment of an order; and
the operation of automatically communicating with one or more of the build facility, the packaging facility, and the shipping facility to implement the desired reallocation of resources comprises dynamically allocating resources to relieve the bottleneck.
20. The method of claim 18 further comprising:
determining available shipping capacity based on shipping and scheduling information for a carrier that serves the manufacturing facility;
analyzing WIP profiles for an order associated with the carrier;
determining a complete percentage of the order, based on the WIP profiles; and
dynamically assigning the carrier to a dock associated with the manufacturing facility in response to determining the complete percentage of the order.
21. The method of claim 20 further comprising:
retrieving required product to fill the order from an automated storage and retrieval system (ASRS);
processing the product for shipment; and
transporting the product to the assigned dock for tender to the carrier.
22. The method of claim 18 further comprising:
detecting an error associated with a resource within the manufacturing facility;
updating the user interface to display the detected error; and
re-allocating resources based on user input received after the detected error has been displayed.
23. The method of claim 22 wherein the operation of detecting an error comprises detecting an equipment error within the manufacturing facility.
24. The method of claim 22 wherein the detecting comprises detecting a process error.
25. The method of claim 22 further comprising:
deploying a simulator to evaluate a re-allocation of resources; and re-allocating resources based on evaluation results from the simulator.
26. The method of claim 22, further comprising:
displaying graphical illustrations of pieces of equipment within the manufacturing facility; and
displaying operational status information for the pieces of equipment.
27. The method of claim 22, further comprising:
automatically updating the WIP profile for at least one area in the manufacturing facility based on scans of each product unit entering the area and each product unit leaving the area, such that the WIP profile is updated for individual product units as those units progress through the manufacturing facility.
28. The method of claim 27, further comprising:
determining total product volume within at least one area in the manufacturing facility by aggregating information on individual product units in the WIP profile for that area.
29. The method of claim 19, further comprising: recognizing ship criteria associated with the order;
analyzing one or more WIP profiles associated with the order;
determining whether the ship criteria associated with the order have been satisfied, based on the analysis of the one or more WIP profiles; and
in response to determining that a ship criterion among the ship criteria has not been satisfied, displaying information that identifies the unsatisfied ship criterion.
Patent Citations (130)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3792785(A) | 1974-02-01 | Weir | Applicant |
| US3796327(A) | 1974-03-01 | Meyer et al. | Applicant |
| US4310276(A) | 1982-01-01 | Castagnoli | Applicant |
| US4336589(A) | 1982-06-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US4473935(A) | 1984-10-01 | Tatsuura et al. | Applicant |
| US4501528(A) | 1985-02-01 | Knapp | Applicant |
| US4509123(A) | 1985-04-01 | Vereen | Examiner |
| US4544318(A) | 1985-10-01 | Nagatomo et al. | Applicant |
| US4566595(A) | 1986-01-01 | Fustier | Applicant |
| US4669047(A) | 1987-05-01 | Chucta | Applicant |
| US4692876(A) | 1987-09-01 | Tenma et al. | Applicant |
| US4703558(A) | 1987-11-01 | Makinen | Applicant |
| US4711016(A) | 1987-12-01 | Genschow et al. | Applicant |
| US4722653(A) | 1988-02-01 | Williams et al. | Applicant |
| US4738387(A) | 1988-04-01 | Jaufmann et al. | Applicant |
| US4798290(A) | 1989-01-01 | Bradford | Applicant |
| US4815190(A) | 1989-03-01 | Haba, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US4821197(A) | 1989-04-01 | Kenik et al. | Applicant |
| US4823233(A) | 1989-04-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US4866628(A) | 1989-09-01 | Natarajan | Applicant |
| US4894908(A) | 1990-01-01 | Haba, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US4966280(A) | 1990-10-01 | Bradford | Applicant |
| US5017260(A) | 1991-05-01 | Bardford | Applicant |
| US5019963(A) | 1991-05-01 | Alderson et al. | Applicant |
| US5037027(A) | 1991-08-01 | Nichols | Applicant |
| US5038283(A) | 1991-08-01 | Caveney | Examiner |
| US5099431(A) | 1992-03-01 | Natarajan | Applicant |
| US5131212(A) | 1992-07-01 | Grey et al. | Applicant |
| US5144532(A) | 1992-09-01 | Wessely et al. | Applicant |
| US5146732(A) | 1992-09-01 | Grey et al. | Applicant |
| US5155847(A) | 1992-10-01 | Kirouac et al. | Applicant |
| US5193065(A) | 1993-03-01 | Guerindon et al. | Applicant |
| US5205406(A) | 1993-04-01 | Bradford | Applicant |
| US5216613(A) | 1993-06-01 | Head, III | Applicant |
| US5218510(A) | 1993-06-01 | Bradford | Applicant |
| US5229948(A) | 1993-07-01 | Wei et al. | Applicant |
| US5247683(A) | 1993-09-01 | Holmes et al. | Applicant |
| US5247747(A) | 1993-09-01 | Grey et al. | Applicant |
| US5255181(A) | 1993-10-01 | Chapman et al. | Applicant |
| US5262954(A) | 1993-11-01 | Fujino et al. | Applicant |
| US5271703(A) | 1993-12-01 | Lindqvist et al. | Applicant |
| US5321605(A) | 1994-06-01 | Chapman et al. | Applicant |
| US5327354(A) | 1994-07-01 | Tsujimoto | Applicant |
| US5344024(A) | 1994-09-01 | Cohu | Applicant |
| US5353243(A) | 1994-10-01 | Read et al. | Applicant |
| US5367624(A) | 1994-11-01 | Cooper | Examiner |
| US5371679(A) | 1994-12-01 | Abe et al. | Examiner |
| US5386621(A) | 1995-02-01 | Fluegge et al. | Applicant |
| US5411151(A) | 1995-05-01 | Sasada | Applicant |
| US5450317(A) | 1995-09-01 | Lu et al. | Applicant |
| US5456061(A) | 1995-10-01 | Grey et al. | Applicant |
| US5469691(A) | 1995-11-01 | Grey et al. | Applicant |
| US5485369(A) | 1996-01-01 | Nicholls et al. | Examiner |
| US5513427(A) | 1996-05-01 | Yokoyama et al. | Applicant |
| US5522539(A) | 1996-06-01 | Bazany | Applicant |
| US5540536(A) | 1996-07-01 | Hoedl | Applicant |
| US5542237(A) | 1996-08-01 | Grey et al. | Applicant |
| US5579231(A) | 1996-11-01 | Sudou et al. | Applicant |
| US5586021(A) | 1996-12-01 | Fargher et al. | Applicant |
| US5590794(A) | 1997-01-01 | Zachary | Applicant |
| US5593269(A) | 1997-01-01 | Bernard, II | Applicant |
| US5596502(A) | 1997-01-01 | Koski et al. | Applicant |
| US5597113(A) | 1997-01-01 | Bradford | Applicant |
| US5608621(A) | 1997-03-01 | Caveney et al. | Applicant |
| US5613606(A) | 1997-03-01 | Meyer | Applicant |
| US5613610(A) | 1997-03-01 | Bradford | Applicant |
| US5630070(A) | 1997-05-01 | Dietrich et al. | Applicant |
| US5653351(A) | 1997-08-01 | Grout et al. | Applicant |
| US5666493(A) | 1997-09-01 | Wojcik et al. | Applicant |
| US5672039(A) | 1997-09-01 | Perry et al. | Applicant |
| US5712989(A) | 1998-01-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US5720157(A) | 1998-02-01 | Ross | Applicant |
| US5758329(A) | 1998-05-01 | Wojcik et al. | Examiner |
| US5787283(A) | 1998-07-01 | Chin et al. | Applicant |
| US5822216(A) | 1998-10-01 | Satchell, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5826238(A) | 1998-10-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US5867714(A) | 1999-02-01 | Todd et al. | Applicant |
| US5869820(A) | 1999-02-01 | Chen et al. | Examiner |
| US5873449(A) | 1999-02-01 | Davenport | Applicant |
| US5894571(A) | 1999-04-01 | O'Connor | Applicant |
| US5896292(A) | 1999-04-01 | Hosaka et al. | Applicant |
| US5903457(A) | 1999-05-01 | Chang | Applicant |
| US5916508(A) | 1999-06-01 | Bradford | Applicant |
| US5919247(A) | 1999-07-01 | Van Hoff et al. | Applicant |
| US5936860(A) | 1999-08-01 | Arnold et al. | Applicant |
| US5937388(A) | 1999-08-01 | Davis et al. | Examiner |
| US5943841(A) | 1999-08-01 | Wunscher | Applicant |
| US5963743(A) | 1999-10-01 | Amberg et al. | Applicant |
| US5971587(A) | 1999-10-01 | Kato et al. | Applicant |
| US5974547(A) | 1999-10-01 | Klimenko | Applicant |
| US5991543(A) | 1999-11-01 | Amberg et al. | Applicant |
| US5991732(A) | 1999-11-01 | Moslares | Applicant |
| US5995757(A) | 1999-11-01 | Amberg et al. | Applicant |
| US6038486(A) | 2000-03-01 | Saitoh et al. | Examiner |
| US6039168(A) | 2000-03-01 | Head, III | Applicant |
| US6052684(A) | 2000-04-01 | Du | Applicant |
| US6076652(A) | 2000-06-01 | Head, III | Applicant |
| US6080207(A) | 2000-06-01 | Kroening et al. | Applicant |
| US6109444(A) | 2000-08-01 | Bagwell et al. | Applicant |
| US6128588(A) | 2000-10-01 | Chacon | Applicant |
| US6139240(A) | 2000-10-01 | Ando | Applicant |
| US6144945(A) | 2000-11-01 | Garg et al. | Applicant |
| US6148291(A) | 2000-11-01 | Radican | Applicant |
| US6170630(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Goss et al. | Applicant |
| US6182275(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Beelitz et al. | Applicant |
| US6202070(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Nguyen et al. | Applicant |
| US6202824(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Goss et al. | Applicant |
| US6205473(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Thomasson et al. | Applicant |
| US6236901(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Goss | Applicant |
| US6247126(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Beelitz et al. | Applicant |
| US6263253(B1) | 2001-07-01 | Yang et al. | Examiner |
| US6308496(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Lee et al. | Examiner |
| US6314337(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Marcum | Applicant |
| US6377561(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Black et al. | Applicant |
| US6397385(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Kravitz | Applicant |
| US6442683(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Fleming, III | Applicant |
| US6499115(B1) | 2002-12-01 | Wiedeman et al. | Applicant |
| EP308248 | 1988-09-01 | Applicant | |
| EP606515(A2) | 1993-03-01 | Applicant | |
| EP606515 | 1993-03-01 | Applicant | |
| JP61094930 | 1986-05-01 | Applicant | |
| JP61155128 | 1986-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP3005894 | 1991-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP6013449 | 1994-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP6345269 | 1994-12-01 | Applicant | |
| JP7110834 | 1995-04-01 | Applicant | |
| JP8147568 | 1996-06-01 | Applicant | |
| JP8295409 | 1996-11-01 | Applicant | |
| JP11306233 | 1999-11-01 | Applicant | |
| JP11310312 | 1999-11-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (15)
- U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/333786, filed Jun. 15, 1999.Applicant
- U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/413463, filed Oct. 6, 1999.Applicant
- U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/378020, filed Aug. 19, 1999.Applicant
- Tom Feare Less Automation Means More Productivity at Sun Microsystems Modern Materials Handling at pp. 39-41, Nov. 1995.Applicant
- U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/053,524 entitled “Build to Order Continuous Flow Manufacturing” filed by Goss; Dell USA, Assignee (DC-01484), filed Mar. 31, 1998.Applicant
- U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/484,712 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Consolidating Manufacturing of Computing Devices”filed by Brown; Dell USA, Assignee (DC-01949), filed Jan. 18, 2000.Applicant
- McHuge Software International, McHugh Software International Makes the “Glass Pipeline” a Reality, New Global Visibility Product is Cornerstone of Supply Chain Command & Control, at internet <http://www.mchugh.com/In_The_News/Oct19_00.htm>, Oct. 19, 2000.Applicant
- McHuge Software International, McHugh's Logistics Execution Solution for High Tech/Electronic Companies, at internet <http://www.mchugh.com/industry/hitech_elec.htm>, printed Jan. 25, 2001.Applicant
- U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2002/0156663 dated Oct. 24, 2002 for U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/903,855 filed Jul. 13, 2001 by David Weber et al.Applicant
- U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2002/0128810 dated Sep. 12, 2002 for U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/020,277 filed Dec. 18, 2001 by John J. Craig et al.Applicant
- U.S. Patent Application Publication No. U.S. 2001/0027350 dated Oct. 4, 2001 for U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/817,152 filed Mar. 27, 2001 by Koga et al.Applicant
- U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/799,849 filed Mar. 5, 2001 by Bickley et al. (Attorney Docket No. 016295.0661).Applicant
- U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/800,042 filed Mar. 5, 2001 by Bickley et al. (Attorney Docket No. 016295.0662).Applicant
- U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/426,232, filed Oct. 22, 1999, entitled “Site-To-Site Dynamic Virtual Local Area Network” filed by Wiedeman et al. and assigned to Dell USA, L.P. (Attorney Docket No. DC-01970).Applicant
- U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/426,932, filed Oct. 22, 1999, entitled “Dynamic Virtual Local Area Network Connection Process” filed by Wiedeman et al. and assigned to Dell USA, L.P. (Attorney Docket No. DC-01966).Applicant