Ruminant tissue analysis at packing plants for electronic cattle management and grading meat

Patent Citations (6)

Non-Patent Literature (109)

• “Answer to Request No. 20—List of Patents, Articles, and other prior-art references,” Fax Transmission from Mullin, Hoard & Brown to Klarquist Sparkman, 12 pp. (Dec. 2001).Applicant
• “Articles Received from Future Beef,” pp. 1-5.Applicant
• “Executive Summary National Beef Quality Audit,” Published by the National Cattlemen's Association in Coordination with Colorado State University and Texas A&M University, 24 pp. (1992) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early —“the year of publication [without the month] will be accepted if the applicant points out in the information disclosure statement that the year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date so that the particular month of publication is not in issue” MPEP 609).Applicant
• “Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle,” 7th Edition (1996) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• “XIIIth World Congress of Diseases of Cattle,” World Buiatrics Association, Proceedings vol. 1 (Sep. 1984).Applicant
• 37th Biennial Report, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Director's Report for the Biennium Jul. 1, 1992 to Jun. 30, 1994, Kansas State University (1995) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• 38th Biennial Report, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Director's Report for the Biennium Jul. 1, 1994 to Jun. 30, 1996, Kansas State University (1997) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Abdullah et al., “Relationships between objective and subjective measurements of carcass muscularity,” Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, vol. 53, pp. 397-402 (1993) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Allen et al., “Relationship of physically separable muscle, fat and bone from the left side of steer carcasses to yields of retail cuts, fat trim and bone of the right side,” pp. 311-315 (Circa more than one year prior to Mar. 8, 2001).Applicant
• Barber et al., “Charolais and angus steers slaughtered at equal percentages of mature cow weight. I. Effects of slaughter weight and diet energy density on carcass traits,” pp. 218-230 (Circa more than one year prior Mar. 8, 2001).Applicant
• Berg and Butterfield, “Muscle: Bone Ratio and Fat Percentages as Measures of Beef Carcass Composition,” Animal Production, vol., 8, Part 1, pp. 1-11 (Feb. 1996).Applicant
• Bond et al., “Effects of Feeding Level on Growth, Composition of Gain, Carcass Quality and Mature Body Size in Steers at Ages up to Six Years,” Growth, pp. 388-403 (1982) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Brethour, “Estimating Marbling Score in Live Cattle from Ultrasound Images Using Pattern Recognition and Neural Network Procedures,” [Fort Hays Branch Experiment Station] Kansas State University, Fort Hays Branch Experiment Station (Circa more than one year prior to Nov. 12, 1998).Applicant
• Busch et al., “Body Measurements, Subjective Scores and Estimates of Certain Carcass Traits as Predictors of Edible Portion in Beef Cattle,” pp. 557-556 (Circa more than one year prior to Nov. 12, 1998).Applicant
• Butcher and Webb, “Equipment for Farm Use in the National Cooperative Dairy Herd Improvement Program,” National Cooperative Dairy Herd Improvement Program Handbood (1985) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Clayton, “Prediction of Feedlot Characteristics and Carcass Characteristics Using Feeder Cattle Traits,” Thesis, Colorado State University (1982) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Corah et al., “Feeding Your Cows by Body Condition”, November Kansas State University [Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Services] (1991) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Cornett, “Sorting By Computer Eye: System measures body so arrivals can be grouped to hit carcass specs.” Beef, pp. 74-78 (Apr. 1994).Applicant
• Cundif et al., “Breeding Cattle for Improved Product Consistency,” Roman L. Hurska US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska, pp. 1-28 (1994) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• CVP Withdrawal Time Charts (Circa more than one year prior to Nov. 12, 1998).Applicant
• Daley, “Prediction of Beef Carcass Composition Using Preslaughter Linear Measures,” Thesis, Colorado State University (1981) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Daley, “Relationship of Pre-weaning Measures and Performance Traits in Beef Cattle,” Dissertation, Colorado State University (1984) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Deterling, “It's What's Under the Hide That Counts,” Progressive Farmer, pp. 62-63 (Feb. 1995).Applicant
• Doye and Northcutt, “Integrated Resource Management (IRM) Tools: Standard Performance Analysis Cow-Calf Software,” Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, F-22, pp. 222.1-222.4 (May 1994).Applicant
• Eck and Garrison, “Management Steps for Predicting Days to Finish (DTF),” Micro Chemical, Inc. (May 1996).Applicant
• Effertz, “Anxiously Awaiting Alliances,” Beef Today, pp. 18-20 (Aug. 1994).Applicant
• Article from Feed Management, vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 55-58 (Mar. 1985).Applicant
• Feuz et al., “Analysis of the Efficiency of Four Marketing Methods for Slaughter Cattle,” Agribusiness, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 453-463 (1993) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Fox and Perry, “Predicting Individual Feed Requirement, Incremental Cost of Gain, and Carcass Composition in Live Cattle Varying in Body Size,” 8 pp. (Circa more than one year prior to Nov. 12, 1998).Applicant
• Fox and Tylutki, “Accounting for the Effects of Environment on the Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle,” J Dairy Science, 81:3085-3095 (1998) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Fox et al., “A Manual for Using the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for Evaluating Cattle Diets,” Revised for CNCPS Release 2 (Aug. 1993).Applicant
• Fox et al., “Cornell Cattle Systems 5 Users Guide: Cattle Growth and Profit Prediction Model For All Classes of Growing Cattle,” (Circa more than one year prior to Nov. 12, 1998).Applicant
• Gibb, “Relationships Among Feeder Cattle Characteristics and Subsequent Production Traits,” Thesis, Colorado State University (1985) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Gill and Lusby, “Limit Feeding Light-Weight Cattle Height Nutrient Density Diets: Programming Feeding for Calves (PROGFED2,)” Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Current Report, Oklahoma State University, CR-3025, pp. 3025.1-3025.8 (Jul. 1992).Applicant
• Gill et al., “Program to Estimate Feedlot Cost of Gain (FLCALC Revision 2),” Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Current Report, Oklahoma State University, CR-304, pp. 304.1-304.4 (1994) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Gill et al., “Spreadsheet Programs for Calculation of Complete Diets for Beef Cattle, Checking for Nutrient Balance and Estimating Gain,” Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Current Report, Oklahoma State University, CR-3027, pp. 3027.1-3027.8 (Apr. 1994).Applicant
• Grafel, “Electronic tracking expands role,” Drovers Journal, p. 12 (Circa more than one year prior to Nov. 12, 1998).Applicant
• Grafel, “Gettting paid what cattle are worth,” Drovers Journal, pp. 24, 26 (1994) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Grandin, “Handling Methods and Facilities to Reduce Stress on Cattle,” Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 325-341 (Jul. 1998).Applicant
• Grandin, “The design and construction of facilities for handling cattle,” Livestock Production Science, vol. 49, pp. 103-120 (1997) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Greathead et al., “The relationship between ultrasonic point readings in live cattle and carcass fat cover,” J. Agric. Sci., pp. 651-657 (1984) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Hankins and Berk, “Relationships Among Production and Grade Factors of Beef,” [Technical Bulletin No. 665] US Department of Agriculture (Nov. 1938).Applicant
• Harrison, “Optimizing Marketing Dates for Steers by Accounting for Individual Differences,” Agriculture Economic Report, No. 372, U.S. Department of Agriculture (Jun. 1977).Applicant
• Hyer et al., “The Relationship of Body Composition and Feed Intake of Beef Steers,” Animal Science Research Report, Agriculture Experiment Station, Division of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University (May 1986).Applicant
• Epley et al., “Prediction of Weight and Percent Retail Cuts of Beef Using Five Carcass Measurements,” J. Animal Science, 30:872-879 (1970) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Zinn et al., “Feedlot and Carcass Characteristics of Steers and Heifers as Influenced By Days on Feed,” J. Animal Science, 31:302-306 (1970) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Brown and Shrode, “Body Measurements of Beef Calves and Traits of Their Dams to Predict Calf Performance and Body Composition as Indicated By Fat Thickness and Condition Score,” J. Animal Science, 33:7-12 (1971) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Brown et al., “Evaluating Relationships Among Immature Measures of Size Shape and Performance of Beef Bulls, II. The Relationships Between Immature Measures of Size, Shape and Feedlot Traits in Young Beef Bulls,” J. Animal Science, 36:1021-1031 (1973) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Crouse et al., “Prediction of Feeder Calf Performance and Subsequent Carcass Characteristics,” J. Animal Science, 38:256-263 (1974) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Koch et al., “Characterization of Biological Types of Cattle III. Carcass Composition, Quality and Palatability,” J. Animal Science, 43:48-62 (1976) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Prior et al., “Influence of Dietary Energy and Protein on Growth and Carcass Composition in Different Biological Types of Cattle,” J. Animal Science, 45:132-146 (1977) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Koch, “Selection in Beef Cattle III. Correlated Response of Carcass Traits to Selection for Weaning Weight, Yearling Weight and Muscling Score in Cattle,” J. Animal Science, 47:142-150 (1978) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Koch et al., “Characterizaiton of Biological Types of Cattle-Cycle II: III. Carcass Composition, Quality and Palatability,” J. Animal Science, 49:448-460 (1979) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Tatum et al., “Carcass Characteristics, Time on Feed and Cooked Beef Palatibility Attributes,” J. Animal Science, 50:833-840 (1980) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Abraham et al., “Factors Affecting Beef Carcass Cutability: An Evaluation of the USDA Yield Grades for Beef,” J. Animal Science, 50:841-851 (1980) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Butts et al., “Relationships Among Definable Characteristics of Feeder Calves, Subsequent Performance and Carcass Traits. I. Objective Measurements,” J. Animal Science, 51:1297-1305 (1980) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Butts et al., “Relationships Among Definable Characteristics of Feeder Calves, Subsequent Performance and Carcass Traits. II. Subjective Scores,” J. Animal Science, 51:1306-1313 (1980) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Lee et al., “Effect of Cattle Type and Energy Intake on Carcass Traits and Adipose Tissue Cellularity,” J. Animal Science, 57:621-627 (1983) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Fox and Black, “A System for Predicting Body Composition and Performance of Growing Cattle,” J. Animal Science, 58:725-739 (1984) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Old and Garrett, “Effect of Energy Intake on Energetic Efficiency and Body Composition of Beef Steers Differing in Size at Maturity,” J. Animal Science, 65:1371-1380 (1987) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Williams et al., “Comparison of Ultrasound Measurements for Predicting Retail Product and Trimmable Fat in Beef Carcasses,” Abstracts form J. Animal Science, vol. 66, abstract 213 (1988) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Oltjen and Garrett, “Effects of Body Weight, Frame Size and Rate of an Gain on the Composition of Gain of Beef Steers,” J. Animal Science, 66:1732-1738 (1988) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Tatum et al., “Influence of Diet of Growth Rate and Carcass Composition of Steers Differing in Frame Size and Muscle Thickness,” J. Animal Science, 66:1942-1954 (1988) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Williams et al., “The Effects of Muscle Thickness and Time on Feed on Hot Fat Trim Yields, Carcass Characteristics and Boneless Subprimal Yields,” J. Animal Science, 67:2669-2676 (1989) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Edwards et al., “Using Ultrasound, Linear Measurements and Live Fat Thickness Estimates to Determine the Carcass Composition of Market Lambs,” J. Animal Science, 67:3322-3330 (1989) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Hicks et al., “Daily Dry Matter Intake by Feedlot Cattle: Influence of Breed and Gender,” J. Animal Science, 68:245-253 (1990) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Hicks et al., “Dry Matter Intake by Feedlot Beef Steers: Influence of Initial Weight, Time on Feed and Season of Year Received in Yard,” J. Animal Science, 68:254-265 (1990) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Faulkner et al., “Prediction of Fat Cover and Carcass Composition from Live and Carcass Measurements,” J. Animal Science, 68:604-610 (1990) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Brackebusch et al., “Relationship Between Longissimus Composition and the Composition of Other Major Muscles of the Beef Carcass,” J. Animal Science, 69:631-640 (1991) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Phillips et al., “Effect of Pre-and Postweaning Management System on the Performance on Brahman Crossbed Feeder Calves,” J. Animal Science, 69:3102-3111 (1991) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Bishop et al., “Divergent Selection for Postweaning Feed Conversion in Angus Beef Cattle: I. Mean Comparisons,” J. Animal Science, 69:4348-4359 (1991) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Kent et al., “Estimates of Beef Carcass Intermuscular Fat,” J. Animal Science, 69:4836-4844 (1991) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Beltran et al., “Growth Patterns of Two Lines of Angus Cattle Selected Using Predicted Growth Parameters,” J. Animal Science, 70:734-741 (1992) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Houghton et al., “Application of Ultrasound for Feeding and Finishing Animals: A Review,” J. Animal Science, 70:930-941 (1992) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Whittaker et al., “Principles of Ultrasound and Measurement of Intramuscular Fat,” J. Animal Science, 70:942-952 (1992) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Perkins et al., “Evaluation of Ultrasound Estimates of Carcass Fat Thickness and Longissimus Muscle Area in Beef Cattle,” J. Animal Science, 70:1002-1010 (1992) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Waldner et al., “Validation of Real-Time Ultrasound Technology for Predicting Fat Thickness, Longissimus Muscle Areas, and Composition of Brangus Bulls from 4 Months to 2 Years of Age,” J. Animal Science, 70:3044-3054 (1992) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Fox et al., “A Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for Evaluating Cattle Diets: III. Cattle Requirements and Diet Adequacy,” J. Animal Science, 70:3578-3596 (1992) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Coleman et al., “Body and Carcass Composition of Angus and Charolais Stress as Affected by Age and Nutrition,” J. Animal Science, 71:86-95 (1993) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Park et al., “Divergent Selection for Postweaning Feed Conversion in Angus Beef Cattle: III. Linear Body Measurements of Progeny,” J. Animal Science, 71:334-340 (1993) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Owens et al., “Factors that Alter the Growth and Development of Ruminants,” J. Animal Science, 71:3138-3150 (1993) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Nour and Thonney, “Technical Note: Chemical Composition of Angus and Holstein Carcasses Predicted from Rib Section Composition,” J. Animal Science, 72:1239-1241 (1994) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Swatland et al., “A Review of Probes and Robots: Implementing New Technologies in Meat Evaluation,” J. Animal Science, 72:1475-1486 (1994) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Herring et al., “Evaluation of Machine, Technician, and Interpreter Effects on Ultrasonic Measures of Backfat and Longissimus Muscle Area in Beef Cattle,” J. Animal Science, 71:2216-2226 (1994) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Gwartney et al., “The Effects of Orientation and Storage Time on the Prediction of Beef Rib Composition Using Electromagnetic Scanning,” J. Animal Science, 73:387-392 (1995) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Shackelford et al., “Predicting Beef Carcass Cutability,” J. Animal Science, 73:406-413 (1995) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Perry and Fox, “Predicting Carcass Composition and Individual Feed Requirement in Live Cattle Widely Varying in Body Size,” J. Animal Science, 75:300-307 (1997) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Jeffrey et al., “Weight-based Adjustment for Ultrasonically Derived Carcass Traits Among Performance Tested Angus Bulls,” Animal Science Research Report, pp. 49-54 (1993) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Brethour, “Using Ultrasound Technology to Increase Cattle Feeding Profits,” KAES Report of Progress No. 570, Fort Hays Branch Experiment Station, Kansas State University, pp. 5-12 (Apr. 1989).Applicant
• Olson, “Efffect of Winter Environment (Range vs Drylot) on Replacement Heifer Development and Behavior,” KAES Report of Progress No. 597, Fort Hays Branch Experiment Station, Kansas State University, pp. 1-33 (Apr. 1990).Applicant
• Brethour, “Relationships of Ultrasound-Measured Backfat to Feedlot Performance of Beef Steers,” KAES Report of Progress No. 627, Fort Hays Branch Experiment Station, Kansas State University, pp. 1-30 (Apr. 1991).Applicant
• Brethour, “Quality Management in the Cattle Industry,” KAES Report of Progress No. 653, Fort Hays Branch Experiment Station, Kansas State University, pp. 1-25 (Apr. 1992).Applicant
• Brethour, “Technology to Implement Quality into Beef Production,” KAES Report of Progress No. 706, Fort Hays Branch Experiment Station, Kansas State University, pp. 13-17 (Circa more than one year prior to Nov. 12, 1998).Applicant
• Bolsen and Young, “Agronomic Performance and Silage Quality Traits of Sorghum Hybrids in 1992 and 1994,” KAES Report of Progress No. 731, Fort Hays Branch Experiment Station, Kansas State University, pp. 1-26 (Apr. 1995).Applicant
• Brethour, “Evaluating Calves with Ultrasound at Weaning for Future Carcass Potential,” KAES Report of Progress No. 808, Fort Hays Branch Experiment Station, Kansas State University, pp. 1-4 (Apr. 1998).Applicant
• Lusby and Gill, “Basic Considerations for Rations and Supplements,” OSU Extension Facts, Oklahoma Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, No. 3012, pp. 3012.1-3012.2 (Mar. 1982).Applicant
• Lusby and Gill, “Formulating Complete Rations,” OSU Extension Facts, Oklahoma Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, No. 3013, pp. 3013.1-3013.4 (Mar. 1982).Applicant
• Lusby and Gill, “Spreadsheet for Calculating Livestock Rations,” OSU Extension Facts, Oklahoma Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, No. 3024, pp. 3024.1-3024.4 (Jul. 1991).Applicant
• Lusby and Gill, “Stocker Cattle Nutrition III: Formulating Supplements,” OSU Extension Facts, Oklahoma Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, No. 3014, pp. 3014.1-3014.4 (Jul. 1982).Applicant
• Maday, “Cattle Sorting Enters a New Age,” DJ Feeder Management, pp. 1-5 & 8 (Sep. 1994).Applicant
• McPeake, “Hip Height and Frame Score Determination,” OSU Extension Facts, Oklahoma Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, F 3271, pp. 3271.1-3271.2 (Circa more than one year prior to Nov. 12, 1998).Applicant
• Miller et al., “Evaluation of Live and Carcass Techniques for Predicting Beef Carcass Composition,” Meat Science, pp. 111-129 (1988) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Murray et al., “Effects of three different growth rates on empty body weight, carcass weight and dissected carcass composition of cattle,” J. Agric Sci., vol. 82, pp. 535-547 (1974) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Oringderff, “A Little Black Box,” pp. 39-44 (Circa more than one year prior to Nov. 12, 1998).Applicant
• Sainz and Oltjen, “Improving Uniformity of Feeder Steers Using Ultrasound and Computer Modeling,” Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science, vol. 45, pp. 179-181 (1994) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Tatum, “Effects of Management History, Breed-Type and Carcass Characteristics on Palatability Attributes of Beef,” Dissertation, Texas A&M University (Aug. 1978).Applicant
• Tatum, “Evaluation of Ultrasound and Visual Appraisal for Estimation of Fat Thickness and Ribeye Area in Live Cattle,” pp. 99-103 (Circa more than one year prior to Nov. 12, 1998).Applicant
• Thornton et al., “Feed Intake by Feedlot Beef Steers: Influence of Initial Weight and Time on Feed,” Animal Science Research Report, Agriculture Experiment Station, Division of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University, pp. 321-331 (1985) (month not in issue, year sufficiently early).Applicant
• Williams et al., “Simulated influence of postweaning production system on performance of different biological types of cattle. II. Carcass composition, retail product and quality,” Roman L. Hruska US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska, pp. 1-28 (Circa more than one year prior to Nov. 12, 1998).Applicant